Slashdot Mirror


WHO Raises Swine Flu Threat Level

Solarch writes "Late in the afternoon on Wednesday, the WHO raised the pandemic threat level for H1N1 "swine flu" to 5. Global media outlets(such as CNN, Fox News, and the BBC) preempted normal broadcast coverage and immediately published stories on their websites. To clarify, the WHO's elevation is mainly a sign to governments that the virus is spreading quickly and that steps should be taken on a governmental level to stage supplies and medicines to combat a possible pandemic. Unfortunately, broadcast coverage focused on phrases like 'pandemic imminent' (CNN marquee). In other news, patient zero, the medical term for the initial human vector of a disease, has been tentatively identified in Mexico."

402 of 557 comments (clear)

  1. I dunno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who does raise the swine flu threat level?

    1. Re:I dunno? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Funny

      WHO's on first.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:I dunno? by nxtr · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is not the pronoun, but rather a global public health agency with the unlikely name of WHO that raised the pandemic threat level.

      Clearly, you are one confused man.

    3. Re:I dunno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      WHOosh.

    4. Re:I dunno? by Bertie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thanks for that. We Won't Get Fooled Again.

    5. Re:I dunno? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's on first?

    6. Re:I dunno? by againjj · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who's on first. What's on second.

    7. Re:I dunno? by PayPaI · · Score: 5, Funny
    8. Re:I dunno? by captnbmoore · · Score: 1, Redundant

      I dunno is on 3rd.

      --
      The Navy Motto "IF it ain't broke Fix It" "A day is wasted if you don't learn something new"
    9. Re:I dunno? by RDW · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, silly, they mean DOCTOR Who. Apparently he's already located Patient Zero:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/doctorwho/gallery/s3_04-05gallery/800/51.jpg

    10. Re:I dunno? by OakDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Chalmers: "Well, Seymour, it seems we've put together a baseball team, and I was wondering, who's on first, eh?"
      Skinner: "Yes. Not the pronoun, but rather a player with the unlikely name of 'Who' is on first."
      Chalmers: "Well that's just great, Seymour! We've been out here six seconds and you've already managed to blow the routine!"

    11. Re:I dunno? by sootman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Costello: Well then who sets the swine flu threat level?
      Abbott: Yes.
      Costello: I mean the group's name.
      Abbott: Who.
      Costello: The group that sets the level.
      Abbott: Who.
      Costello: The group that...
      Abbott: Who!
      Costello: I'm asking YOU who sets the level!
      Abbott: That's the group's name.
      Costello: That's who's name?
      Abbott: Yes.
      Costello: Well go ahead and tell me.
      Abbott: That's it.
      Costello: That's who?
      Abbott: Yes.
      Costello: Look, you got a group that sets the level?
      Abbott: Certainly.
      Costello: Who?
      Abbott: That's right.
      Costello: All I'm trying to find out is what's the group's name that sets the swine flu level.
      Abbott: No. WHAT is the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group.
      Costello: I'm not asking you who's the Web Hypertext Application Technology Working Group.
      Abbott: Who sets the level!
      Costello: I don't know.
      Abbott & Costello Together: Third base!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    12. Re:I dunno? by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

      Whoosh -- the sound of a Simpsons reference going over AC's head.

    13. Re:I dunno? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Horton is listening.

    14. Re:I dunno? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2, Funny

      We all know it's the VIRAL GPL (Genes of Pig Linux)

    15. Re:I dunno? by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Pigs on the run?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:I dunno? by stms · · Score: 1

      I do

    17. Re:I dunno? by johannesg · · Score: 5, Funny

      You are all making jokes but you are missing the big picture. The WHO is an agency of the United Nations, and they *want* you to panic so they can take over your government! Haven't you people learned nothing from Deus Ex!?

    18. Re:I dunno? by houghi · · Score: 1

      The pinball wizard?

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    19. Re:I dunno? by Jeian · · Score: 1

      Then who's on third?

    20. Re:I dunno? by aetherworld · · Score: 1

      Clearly, you are one confused man.

      Who is?

    21. Re:I dunno? by pmarini · · Score: 1

      where have the goold old days of punctuating an acronym gone?
      W.H.O. as in World Health Organisation

      not to be confused with abbreviations like Inc. (for Incorporated, and yes, I'd like people to puctuate this as well...)

      --
      Can I put a spell on those who can't spell?
      Your wheels are loose and they're losing their grip, good you're there.
    22. Re:I dunno? by ayjay29 · · Score: 2, Funny

      WHO let the pigs out? (Oink, Oink, Oink, Oink)
      WHO let the pigs out? (Oink, Oink, Oink, Oink)

      --
      Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    23. Re:I dunno? by wildsurf · · Score: 1
      --
      Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
    24. Re:I dunno? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      It's not time to panic yet.

      The scale is from 1 to 1000, where 20 is the common cold.

      If Swine Flu is only a 5, obviously it's not a problem.

      Or is this '5' using a different scale?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    25. Re:I dunno? by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Or is this '5' using a different scale?

      Yeah, it goes to 11.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    26. Re:I dunno? by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not time to panic yet.

      Absolutely not. But that's what the parent is indicating: it's overhyped and there's a spread of "fear" and needless "danger" associated with it in the media.

      In recent events, the stockmarket has crashed, economies are trying to recover, alot of people in unemployment and instead of taking action, they're manipulated into panic and fear about some insignificant virus and envisioning a swine-apocalypse. To me it seems a bit as populuscontrol or some weak sensationalism.

      Do you remember SARS?

      --
      I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
    27. Re:I dunno? by Bovarchist · · Score: 1

      I just thought that Pete Townsend had gained an unprecedented level of global policy control.

      --
      Hell is other people's code.
    28. Re:I dunno? by Garabito · · Score: 1

      Then who's on third?

      No, Who's on first.

    29. Re:I dunno? by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

      McBain: That was the joke.

      --
      "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
    30. Re:I dunno? by relguj9 · · Score: 1

      I dunno's on third!

    31. Re:I dunno? by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

      Do you remember SARS?

      Do you remember Bird Flu, Spanish Flu, and Ebola?

      I wonder when the news will realize their responsibility that sensationalism causes the sheeple to panic.

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    32. Re:I dunno? by charlezhunt · · Score: 1

      I don't think The WHO want's to take over, I think its the pigs...

      --
      ~~~ Charles Hunt ~~~ http://www.charleshunt.me ~~~
    33. Re:I dunno? by norminator · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they don't really want you to panic to me. Besides, this whole level 5 thing is about whether this is a pandemic, not whether it's super deadly. A pandemic just means it's "an epidemic of infectious disease that spreads through populations across a large region; for instance a continent, or even worldwide."

    34. Re:I dunno? by norminator · · Score: 1

      I'm glad he set the record straight, because I know I Can't Explain it. Maybe it's a problem with My Generation.

    35. Re:I dunno? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Haven't you people learned nothing from Deus Ex!?

      I learned that if there was ever a terrorist attack on New York it would cause various invasive and overreaching laws to be passed in the name of security, and that the destroyed edifice wouldn't be repaired or rebuilt, leaving a void in the skyline for decades.

    36. Re:I dunno? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Do you remember Bird Flu, Spanish Flu, and Ebola?

      I do, but I doubt most people do. In the mind of Joe Sixpack, it probably goes:

      Spanish Flu? Is that what you get from taking too much Spanish Fly?

      Ebola? Oh, there was something on that years ago, I don't remember what.

      SARS? The Asian disease, right? That was the stuff that Japanese terrorist released in the subway, right?

      Bird flu? I remember that! Killed some people in some country with a funny name.

      Swine flu? OH MY GOD WE'RE GONNA DIE!

  2. Please let it be!! by happy_place · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I get the feeling that Media outlets are DESPERATELY Hoping that this will be a Pandemic... as if they're bored or really really really like human suffering... oh wait, what's that saying about if it bleeds it's frontpage news? Sigh. --Ray PS> Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
    1. Re:Please let it be!! by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it
      > would imply if I caught it...

      Then call it Mexican flu.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Please let it be!! by Mad+Merlin · · Score: 1

      Of course they are, nobody cares about good news, only bad news.

    3. Re:Please let it be!! by rasper99 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The saying is "If it bleeds, it leads" as in leading story.

    4. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

      You're thinking of Swine Syphillis.

    5. Re:Please let it be!! by V50 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, there's certainly a section of the media that wants terrible news to happen. I don't think they consciously or overtly want stuff to happen, but deep inside, I do think that part of them does.

      I think it's partially human nature though. I've found myself sort of bugged at times by part of me that wants a war to break out, or a pandemic to happen, or the stock market to tank, etc. I think it comes from oftentimes looking at news as fiction that happens far away. And for the most part it's true. If a war breaks out in Africa, for instance, for the majority of North Americans or whatnot, it may as well be fiction for how little it actually affects them.

      tldr; When it doesn't directly harm them, IMO, people often look at news as fiction, and want a more exciting outcome.

    6. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now that's just insulting.

    7. Re:Please let it be!! by ring-eldest · · Score: 5, Funny

      Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

      Don't kid yourself, slashdot-netizen, chances are you don't get enough human interaction or even sunlight to risk infection. You're as good as immune.

    8. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I get the feeling that Media outlets are DESPERATELY Hoping that this will be a Pandemic

      That's what happened with Iraq war. The press was all about covering the war. They all got huge ratings boosts from it. Once they realized that reporters could and were being killed, because gasp, its not a video game, they turned anti-war and anti-Bush; despite helping to fuel the war up front.

      Most US press these days isn't worth using to wipe your ass.

    9. Re:Please let it be!! by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      ...Until it infects the CNN crew.

      Now, THAT'S news that matters...

    10. Re:Please let it be!! by treeves · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's actually what Israel is calling it. I guess "swine flu" isn't kosher.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    11. Re:Please let it be!! by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Perhaps this is part of an economic strategy. Part of the problem with Mexicans in the U.S. is that there are so many of them suppressing not only the wages of the locals but that of the Mexicans themselves. So, the U.S. and Mexican government got together to make this new flu to help shrink the population a bit. This will also help relieve the unemployment rate in the U.S. so it may fix many problems before it's all over.

      Meanwhile, other people will also see opportunity in this as opponents of NAFTA will surely point out that NAFTA is a really bad idea since the food product handling standards in Mexico are so poor that this wouldn't be the first, second or even third time disease originating from Mexico would make it's way across the border. (And in this case, the poor standards of raising pork are responsible.) Allowing products that wouldn't pass inspection in the U.S. to be imported into the U.S. is not only a means by which U.S. companies can get around needed government controls and regulation and avoid paying U.S. workers, it is a hazardous idea as evidenced by what we have seen.

      What's more, this could be a terrific military opportunity to send forces into Mexico "to assist and advise" the Mexican army in quarantining their people. As it turns out, polls suggest that having brown skin is no longer a justification for the U.S. to invade and occupy a foreign sovereign nation. We need an excuse that says they are a threat in some way.

      (Yes, I am not totally serious, but it would make great news stories wouldn't it? And if any of these ideas sound at ALL reasonable or plausible... well, you heard it hear first.... maybe... Check Wikileaks to see if anything on the subjects have appeared yet...)

    12. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it
      > would imply if I caught it...

      Then call it Mexican flu.

      That's better?

    13. Re:Please let it be!! by bobdevine · · Score: 1

      > I get the feeling that Media outlets are DESPERATELY Hoping that this will be a Pandemic

      The media is ghoulish.

      Remember a month ago when the Red River was rising, threatening huge areas of the northern plain states? Reporters swarmed the area and issued dire stories ... until the local citizen successfully beat the river with miles of sandbags.

      "If it bleeds, it leads."

    14. Re:Please let it be!! by smaddox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Back when there was this method called "investigative reporting", there would be crazy things going on all the time, and yet exposing them actually brought improvements.

      Today, "investigative reporting" means blowing trivial and menial things completely out of proportion, asking non-experts their oppinions, and twisting experts words into doom and gloom. It's pathetic how hard these people work to do nothing.

    15. Re:Please let it be!! by FatdogHaiku · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think it's partially human nature though.

      They call it Schadenfreude http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude and there is a lot more of it in the world than one would like to believe.

      --
      You have the right to remain sentient. If you give up the right to remain sentient, you will be elected to public office
    16. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is it insulting?

      The 1918 flu pandemic was known as the Spanish Flu because it was first widely reported in Spain. Other countries with earlier infections had been at war and were censoring news stories but Spain was not (In Spain it was known as the French Flu).

      This outbreak was first recorded in Mexico so it makes sense to call it the Mexico Flu.

    17. Re:Please let it be!! by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      Happy place is the same user as untoward? Who'da thunk it?

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    18. Re:Please let it be!! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there's certainly a section of the media that wants terrible news to happen.

      They're called the accountants.

      "Stay tuned to CNN to hear the latest about this global killer! Are you at risk?! We'll tell you everything you need to know to keep you and your children safe!!!

      But first, these important messages from Sprint, United Airlines, Microsoft, and Lenscrafters."

    19. Re:Please let it be!! by V50 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with you to a degree, there certainly is a human element that enjoys other people's suffering. Not too complex though, it makes us feel better in comparison. :)

      What I meant though, to use an example, is having part of you wish a destructive news event to occur, more for entertainment purposes.

      To use an example, back in 2003, (when I was 15) I was a strong supporter of the Iraq war. I made all sorts of justifications based on human rights, WMDs (laugh all you want), Saddam being a dick, etc. The real reason I supported the Iraq invasion in '03 is because I wanted to see a war take place, I wanted exciting footage of missiles hitting Baghdad, I wanted propaganda from both sides, I wanted maps on Wikipedia with how much each side held. Part of me was even disappointed when Baghdad fell quickly. I wanted to see a nasty battle.

      Criticise me as a deranged sociopath all you want, but treating the news as entertainment is far from limited to me. Most people dress it up with other reasons though, like I did. The difference is that because I was 15 at the time, I didn't really hide my true motives for supporting the Iraq invasion very far, knowing the whole time I really just wanted a big expensive exciting war drama to be broadcast over CNN.

      And for all it affected me at the time, (15, Canadian, knew no Americans, let alone military personnel.), it may as well have been a war movie. Being older, (hopefully) more mature, and knowing several people who have served in Iraq and/or Afghanistan, perhaps my opinion would be a bit different, but at the time, Iraq may have been a war movie to me, and good entertainment.

    20. Re:Please let it be!! by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, I think it's mainly just wanting some stimulation or excitement, or to be part of something historic, and not particularly happiness at others' misfortune. There is something very rousing about feeling you are part of history, or in an epic battle.

    21. Re:Please let it be!! by pohl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      LOL... Right, it's because they discovered it wasn't a video game - not that it became evident that the justification was mere pretense.

      --

      The "cue the foo posts in 3, 2, 1..." posts will commence with no subsequent foo posts in 3, 2, 1...

    22. Re:Please let it be!! by dudeinthedark · · Score: 1

      +------------+
      +-_this_is_a-+
      +--swine_flu-+
      +copy_it_help+
      +--it_mutate-+
      +------------+

    23. Re:Please let it be!! by Carnivore · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Which is weird, because I would think that having a deadly disease come from pigs would lend credence to the claim that pigs are filthy animals and should be anathema.

      But who said that religion had anything to do with logic...

    24. Re:Please let it be!! by treeves · · Score: 4, Informative
      I thought so too, but I just found this:

      Swine flu name wont be changed in Israel
      By Marc Brodsky April 29, 2009
      NEW YORK (JTA) -- The swine flu will not take any new names in Israel despite the unease of a health official from a fervently religious party.
      Deputy health minister Yakov Litzman, a member of United Torah Judaism, said earlier this week that the name "swine flu" should not be used as it contains the name of the unkosher animal. Litzman suggested that authorities call the virus sweeping the globe "Mexican flu."
      But Mexico's ambassador to Israel, Frederico Salas, and the Jewish state's envoy to Mexico, Yosef Livne, both lodged official complaints Tuesday to the Israeli Foreign Ministry protesting the term.
      A Foreign Ministry official told the French news agency AFP that Salas "was offended" by the term "Mexican flu."
      "Israel has no intention of giving the flu any new names," the official said. "It was nothing more than a slip of the tongue."
      Two Israelis who recently returned from Mexico have contracted swine flu in the first such cases in the Middle East. Several other cases are suspected, including the 5-year-old niece of one of the confirmed cases.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    25. Re:Please let it be!! by jesser · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just make sure you don't get caught downloading the iraq war. With all the money they put into it, I don't think they'd be happy to find it being torrented.

      --
      The shareholder is always right.
    26. Re:Please let it be!! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it..

      Uh am I missing something here? What's implied by catching "swine influenza"?

      I might possibly see a problem if you're a fearful Muslim or or Jew with prohibitions against pigs, but uh, only if you're stupid.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    27. Re:Please let it be!! by Asclepius99 · · Score: 1

      PS> Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

      What do you think the assumption would be? "You hear Ray died of Swine Flu?" "Ew! What'd he do make out with a pig?"

    28. Re:Please let it be!! by Bitmap0023 · · Score: 5, Informative

      whats strange is the original outbreak of the 1918 spanish flu started at a Kansas army base. As the WW1 soldiers were deployed to Europe the virus went with them.

    29. Re:Please let it be!! by nbauman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Deputy health minister Yakov Litzman, a member of United Torah Judaism, said earlier this week that the name "swine flu" should not be used as it contains the name of the unkosher animal. Litzman suggested that authorities call the virus sweeping the globe "Mexican flu."

      You mean herpes is kosher, so they don't have to change its name?

      You really have to be Jewish to realize what an idiot this guy is. But if you're not, you can sort of get the idea.

    30. Re:Please let it be!! by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be more interesting to read about if they printed all the new news about swine flue in pig latin?

      Happy thoughts... happy place... :)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
    31. Re:Please let it be!! by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

      But Mexico's ambassador to Israel, Frederico Salas, and the Jewish state's envoy to Mexico, Yosef Livne, both lodged official complaints Tuesday to the Israeli Foreign Ministry protesting the term.

      Sounds like a Mexican standoff with the religious party!

    32. Re:Please let it be!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "This outbreak was first recorded in Mexico so it makes sense to call it the Mexico Flu."

      I wonder if by chance this will finally be the thing that will make them close our border down south?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    33. Re:Please let it be!! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      There is something very rousing about feeling you are part of history, or in an epic battle.

      Yeah, it makes me piss my pants.

    34. Re:Please let it be!! by roger6106 · · Score: 1

      It's neat to see the world governments working together on a good goal for once. It gives me a little bit of hope in humanity.

    35. Re:Please let it be!! by wumingzi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wonder if by chance this will finally be the thing that will make them close our border down south?

      You mean stop letting my coworkers and neighbors go down to Cancun so they can come back here and infect me and my children with swine flu? Excellent idea!

      Oh. You were talking about the guys in front of the labor pickup area. Seen 'em. Don't talk to 'em. Don't drink with 'em. They're not a big health concern to me.

    36. Re:Please let it be!! by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      Don't know why your modded funny?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    37. Re:Please let it be!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The guy told a brutal and personal truth that describes human nature in a way I've never seen before. It was, in every conceivable way, insightful. That comment (the GP, not you) is not only an example of what makes me read /., it is an example of what makes me read.

      So tell me, what do pop psychologists think causes people to be self-deluded, hyper-critical jerks?

    38. Re:Please let it be!! by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Imagine if after a pandemic all that is left are slashdotters, I would be really cool (except for that death of most of humanity thingy). We would finally find out if there are actually girls in slashdot or not.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    39. Re:Please let it be!! by terminalhype · · Score: 1

      There are girls here. Trust me, I know this to be true. ;)

    40. Re:Please let it be!! by mindcorrosive · · Score: 1

      Tormented? I thought that it's the CIA that does this. Oh, wait..

      --
      + 3.14 Transcendental
    41. Re:Please let it be!! by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Nah, I disagree. 9/11 was bigger than many other events with large death tolls because 9/11 was a massive MURDER. It wasn't a natural disaster, wasn't an accident, wasn't even a war. It was a big murder. And 300 million Americans realized, many for the first time, that somebody wants to murder them.

    42. Re:Please let it be!! by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Funny story on this - my brother in law was visiting an outsourcing company in Guadalajara (there's a chip testing lab they operate there), and when he came back everything was fine, but then 2 weeks later I get the flu.

      All I can think while sitting in bed feeling ill and generally sorry for myself was: I've been boned by outsourcing so much this year :( - I doubt its related though since I don't have all the symptoms (at least I hope not - don't have insurance).

    43. Re:Please let it be!! by thefekete · · Score: 1

      I know someone who had Spanish Fly... Is that the same thing?

      --
      The cool things is to have windows that bounce up and down like a good tits.
    44. Re:Please let it be!! by DigitalWallaby · · Score: 1

      Yet the 1994 Rwandan genocide was a massive murder of hundreds of thousands. Sure, it made for a lot of news, yet the reaction in the Western world was hardly as vocal as was the tragedy of 9/11 or even perhaps as much as the Oklahoma bombing.

      The reason that 9/11 was such a big deal to Americans is because it happened to them and not someone else.

    45. Re:Please let it be!! by torsmo · · Score: 1

      Would it be ok to call it the North American Flu, then? Coz I heard on the news (Reuters, I believe) that it came with someone from California, who was visiting the La Gloria region in Mexico.

    46. Re:Please let it be!! by Znork · · Score: 4, Informative

      It wasn't a natural disaster, wasn't an accident, wasn't even a war. It was a big...

      The term you're looking for is blowback.

    47. Re:Please let it be!! by jeric23 · · Score: 1

           /\
          /--\
         /----\
        /------\
      /-KOPIMI-\
      /__________\

    48. Re:Please let it be!! by Xest · · Score: 1

      I was working for a newspaper when 9/11 happened and was wandering through the corridors of our offices that day and passed our CEO talking to another guy as I passed them in the corridor and heard them say about it "This is great, it's going to sell so many papers".

      So I'd say it's not always just as innocent as human nature, there are some arseholes out there who like the money that tragedy brings in, whether it's common or not in the news business I don't know, but certainly there's at least one arsehole thinking that way.

    49. Re:Please let it be!! by Petersson · · Score: 1

      >> Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it
      >> would imply if I caught it...

      > Then call it Mexican flu.

      What's wrong with Freedom Flu?

      --
      I'm not insane. My mother had me tested.
    50. Re:Please let it be!! by Knutsi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A Norwegian health authority official stated "our worst case scenario is that 1,4 million gets sick, 13.000 dies" then went on to underline this was the WORST case scenario, and it might even end up being nothing. What does the headlines say in the media? "13.000 might die!", and "1,4 million fall ill!". Why? To scare me? What kind of people are these editors and journalists?

    51. Re:Please let it be!! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "You mean stop letting my coworkers and neighbors go down to Cancun so they can come back here and infect me and my children with swine flu? Excellent idea!

      Oh. You were talking about the guys in front of the labor pickup area. Seen 'em. Don't talk to 'em. Don't drink with 'em. They're not a big health concern to me."

      Well, yes to both!

      They both contribute to the problem, and I'd put forth the latter probably would address the problem more than the former.

      There are TONS of the illegal migrant workers streaming across the border (both ways sometimes, as that often they do go back home to visit. There are likely more potentially infected people coming across illegally than there are visitors going back and forth from the US.

      Yes, we may have some cases already here in the US, but, I'd think that even more exposer can't be good. I mean, if we're willing to already close schools if a SINGLE kid shows up with symptoms, it would seem that cutting off flow of humans from a country that has a large problem would be a no-brainer.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    52. Re:Please let it be!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      And it had fireballs like we know them from movies. None of that "grainy footage of some burned down barely recognizable buildings" or boring flash and smoke war weapons produce, live destruction. Actual footage of the damage ocurring, not just the scattered debries. You don't get to see that with tornadoes or tsunamis and especially not as quickly and highlight reel friendly as with that attack. I mean, even with regular attacks, even if they're worse than that you usually don't see them caught on camera.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    53. Re:Please let it be!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      We bought a tabloid on 12 Sep 2001, the only part that didn't make us laugh loudly were the funny pages.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    54. Re:Please let it be!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      More likely they turned around because the public prefers to read stuff that affirms their bias. Dead (even better: held hostage) reporters make great headlines, then you just hire some more cannonfodder and send it down there.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    55. Re:Please let it be!! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      So where DID you stick it into the pig then?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    56. Re:Please let it be!! by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Today, "investigative reporting" means blowing trivial and menial things completely out of proportion, asking non-experts their oppinions, and twisting experts words into doom and gloom.

      You're absolutely right!

      It's the end of journalism as we know it.

      And what will come after? The end of Internet? The Armaggeddon?!

    57. Re:Please let it be!! by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      But who said that religion had anything to do with logic...

      Hmm, I RTFA, they didn't mention that, they only raised the threat level!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    58. Re:Please let it be!! by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Well at least we know who to blame now.

    59. Re:Please let it be!! by DaFallus · · Score: 1

      ManBirdPig

      --
      No one cares what your captcha was

      Houston TX, USA
    60. Re:Please let it be!! by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      smaddox said

      Today, "investigative reporting" means blowing trivial and menial things completely out of proportion, asking non-experts their oppinions, and twisting experts words into doom and gloom. It's pathetic how hard these people work to do nothing.

      No one will ever read this, but anyhow.

      Reporting that provides real news is like baking. Bake too fast and it's burnt or gooey. News needs time to confirm and fact check. Too late and its old. Information can now travel at the speed of stupid, since it's delivered to thousands of people immediately. It's a case of shoot data out first then confirm it later. Modern society is getting too comfortable getting information in seconds.

      News sources justify their existence and keep eyes on the screen by doing exactly what you describe. If only there was someway to keep our attention only reliable sources and not flit from place to place. Oops gotta go! Checking Facebook, email, IM, phone texting, Twitter, MySpace and MSN chat.

       

    61. Re:Please let it be!! by JorgeFierro · · Score: 1

      'I wonder if by chance this will push all the gringos back to north USA so we can finally recover our land.'

      You see? it's easy to make hate comments. Geez, And I thought geeks had a stronger opinion than the average person in these cultural regards.

    62. Re:Please let it be!! by omar_armas · · Score: 1

      In fact the virus has genes from Asia, Europe and North America, so we should call it "global flu". Omar

    63. Re:Please let it be!! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      No, I think it's mainly just wanting some stimulation or excitement, or to be part of something historic, and not particularly happiness at others' misfortune. There is something very rousing about feeling you are part of history, or in an epic battle.

      As far as I'm concerned, most of the time being a part of history means you fucked up. Yes, there are exceptions, but I'm not interested in dying on some field somewhere, or being the guy who didn't get the message through, or being the guy who stopped the message from getting through.
      Perhaps I subscribe a little to much to the idea behind the Chinese curse, "May you live in interesting times." Or maybe I'm too paranoid. But either way, I won't be upset if no one but my descendants remember me in 100 years.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    64. Re:Please let it be!! by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Great one here last night the TV station runs a scroller for 6 cases in state and one local every 20 minutes. So what does the news say when it finally comes on? "We can't confirm the cases yet and we can't discuss the cases nor tell you exactly where they are...best to wait and see..."
      I assume they kept talking anyway, by then i decided the analysis of Obama's speech would be more exciting :(

      They ran a frickin scroll all evening so i can tune in to be told to wait... sigh

      Won't even bother mentioning the picture of the pig sty in the background of the news story :(

    65. Re:Please let it be!! by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      Deputy health minister Yakov Litzman, a member of United Torah Judaism, said earlier this week that the name "swine flu" should not be used as it contains the name of the unkosher animal. Litzman suggested that authorities call the virus sweeping the globe "Mexican flu."

      So it's okay for Jews to eat Mexicans...?

    66. Re:Please let it be!! by Toonol · · Score: 1

      of COURSE it's a lot more attention-getting when I find out somebody wants to kill ME. That's not being superficial or selfish, that's being human. The Rwandans care a lot more about Rwandans dying than Americans, as they should.

    67. Re:Please let it be!! by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Hm. No, that's not it.

    68. Re:Please let it be!! by Hawke666 · · Score: 1

      What's with the apostrophe before "flu"? If it's to indicate the omited "in", shouldn't there be another one after, to indicate the omitted "enza"?

    69. Re:Please let it be!! by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Fool me, fool me twice.. won't get fooled again!

    70. Re:Please let it be!! by Zarluk · · Score: 1

      I am gross and perverted
      Im obsessed n deranged
      I have existed for years
      But very little had changed
      I am the tool of the government
      And industry too
      For I am destined to rule
      And regulate you

      I may be vile and pernicious
      But you cant look away
      I make you think Im delicious
      With the stuff that I say
      I am the best you can get
      Have you guessed me yet?
      I am the slime oozin out
      From your tv set
      (...)
      Frank Zappa (more here)

    71. Re:Please let it be!! by Zarluk · · Score: 1

      Would hate to die of Swine Flu, just because of what it's called... and all that it would imply if I caught it...

      Don't kid yourself, slashdot-netizen, chances are you don't get enough human interaction or even sunlight to risk infection. You're as good as immune.

      Unless you're using Windows...

  3. Semi-Pandemic by Plekto · · Score: 2, Informative

    The sad thing is that it will affect the poor and the Third World most of all. Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

    $50 for some medicine is pretty much nothing in the U.S., for instance. If you're in India or China, well... life's going to get rough for a lot of people there.

    1. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, the virus strikes people with healthy immune systems, and the causes of death are an immune system overreaction. Translated: People with excellent immune systems are more likely to die than those with weaker ones.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

    2. Re:Semi-Pandemic by capandbells · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Actually, the major issue with this flu is that it is most dangerous to those with strong immune systems because of the potential for cytokine storms (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm). But yeah, anti-virals will help a lot.

    3. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually, everything I've read has given me the opinion that it is the most healthy who are at risk for actually dying from this flu.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

    4. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Jamamala · · Score: 1

      Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      Your main point is still valid, but I should point out that swine flu currently kills by turning the immune system against the host, by way of a cytokine storm. Therefore, the people with the strongest immune system are more likely to die than the ill, old or young. This was also the case with the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918.

    5. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      Wow. You have just far too much faith in the governments of the world, and medicine. First of all there's not enough antiviral flu medication for everyone if the virus spreads to a large percentage of the population (not to mention infra-structure to distribute all of it, care for everyone, etc). Secondly, the flu mutates like crazy. The virus can easily evolve into a strain that's resistant to the 4 drugs used against influenza. At that point being rich isn't going to save you.

      --
      AccountKiller
    6. Re:Semi-Pandemic by mkiwi · · Score: 1

      One of the things about this disease is that, for a weaker person, getting this flu is similar to getting any other flu. Obviously not good, but then you could catch a different bug at any time.

      This flu causes a reaction such that the body fills itself with mucus, causing pneumonia-like problems. The immune systems of people who are 18-35 are usually very strong; however, it is the body's (over)reaction to this flu that puts our healthy demographic's lives in danger.

      If you have a bad immune system you'll overreact less.

    7. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Informative


      It it is most dangerous to those with strong immune systems because of the potential for cytokine storms

      Which is pure speculation at this point. The truth is nobody knows why it's mostly killed young people so far. Pointing to a cytokine storm as the cause is possible, but very misleading.

      --
      AccountKiller
    8. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Brett+Buck · · Score: 3, Informative

      The sad thing is that it will affect the poor and the Third World most of all. Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      Not necessarily. The reason the 1918 version of H1N1 was so bad was that those with healthy immune systems were more likely to die because the immune system overreacted. You have a point about the antiviral medicine, but the other factors *favor* those in third-world countries.

      Brett

    9. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Toonol · · Score: 1

      That potential for a terrible pandemic is really no different than we've faced every flu season for the last few centuries. Also, rich people tend to be clean; that may just save them after all.

    10. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Plekto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wow. You have just far too much faith in the governments of the world, and medicine
      ****
      We've had one death so far in the U.S., and it was a baby. Two of the drugs that we do have available are effective, and I heard that there are roughly enough of those two to treat 30-50 million people in the U.S.

      My comment wasn't about the people in the richer nations being so much better off so much as it being a commentary on the sad state of affairs where the poor get hit the hardest, like they do pretty much any time a disaster happens.

      I don't have much faith in governments, but those populations without ANY modern medicine at all are going to suffer a large number of deaths. Be it from overactive immune systems or compromised ones - both extremes seem to be a problem in these sorts of situations.

      In India, you have millions of people who are so poor that they burn garbage to keep warm. When droves of them start dying, secondary diseases and epidemics become a real worry as well. No, not everyone in India is like that, obviously, but with nearly a billion people all living in a pretty close proximity to each other, it's not likely that things will be good, either.

    11. Re:Semi-Pandemic by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Is it funny or ironic that the very way this flu works on the internal immune system is what we're afraid of doing in our social environment?

      The government can very possibly overreact and kill people off like it did last time bird flu came about.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    12. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very true.

      At this point we're just using hypotheses and another one that I just dreamed up is that ths strain needs a certain industrial polutants to be between certain points (sweet spot) for it to be lethal.

      Since more people have caught it, and more people have died from it in Mexico, this is also plausible, since the polution levels are easily higher there than in the US and Europe.

      I say plausible, but very unlikely, as I just came up with this halfassed idea. But if it ends up being true, I want credit!

    13. Re:Semi-Pandemic by theNAM666 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The sad thing is that it will affect the poor and the Third World most of all. Only the extremely ill, old, young, and those with compromised immune systems will have a problem in more developed countries where antiviral medicine is available.

      This is likely somewhat inaccurate. The efficacy of SARS and the previous avian flus-- and of pandemic flus in general-- is that they cause the strongest human immune systems (18-30 yrs) to overreact and fill the lungs with fluid, slowly drowning the victims. (Antivirals are also not all that effective, versus respirators and manual techniques to clear the lungs).

      We also don't quite know what we're up against, get.

      That said, if the developing world looses its young and strong, that is in some ways worse. But don't think the developed world is out of the way: avian flu killed one in three victims in Hong Kong, right?

    14. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Plekto · · Score: 1

      True, but my point wasn't so much about potential death rates as much as the ability of the more modernized nations to deal with those acute cases and save as many as possible. If you have one 1 out of 100 with serious complications, and then you can treat them in a hospital with say, only a 10-20% death rate, that's a huge factor compared to a poorer country where those who have such complications just die.

    15. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Kryis · · Score: 1

      What do you mean by died from 'this in the past 30 years'? From what? The strain of 'flu that had never been seen before a couple of weeks ago?

      The problem with this strain of 'flu is that there isn't any historical data on it; it is brand new. Which means that we don't have any vaccines against it, and will take the best part of a year to develop a safe one.

    16. Re:Semi-Pandemic by againjj · · Score: 4, Funny

      That page is riddled with [citation needed]. It doesn't exactly inspire confidence.

    17. Re:Semi-Pandemic by an+unsound+mind · · Score: 3, Informative

      Aaand clarifying before justified downmods:

      It kills healthy people, more of them thus far than ill people. And it's rather obvious why it hasn't killed much people in the last 30 years - if you don't get that, get the hell outta my Slashdot and your ass into Biology 101.

      It's not yet confirmed it's cytokine storm precisely - but it's certainly a possibility on the table.

    18. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Kryis · · Score: 1

      Rich people are clean?! I assume you take "rich" to mean "not 3rd-world", in which case;

      Have you SEEN the number of people that are willing to cough and sneeze into their hands and then wipe it all over a door handle, or other shared item? In terms of general cleanliness, the number of people that can't stop on the way out of the toilet to wash their hands is shocking.

    19. Re:Semi-Pandemic by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1


      It it is most dangerous to those with strong immune systems because of the potential for cytokine storms

      Which is pure speculation at this point. The truth is nobody knows why it's mostly killed young people so far. Pointing to a cytokine storm as the cause is possible, but very misleading.

      No it's not; read up on the Spanish flu of 1918-1920, this strain is very similar and is functioning in exactly the same way.

    20. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Macrat · · Score: 1

      We've had one death so far in the U.S., and it was a baby.

      Technically it was a Mexican just "visiting."

    21. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      Also, rich people tend to be clean

      Huh? I'll never understand the persistent beliefs about disease. Yesterday I heard a (translated) Chinese woman dismissing swine flu as nothing compared to SARS. She truly believed that as long as you kept a clean house, opened your doors and windows a lot, and kept clean you could avoid the virus.

      So after more than 100 years of understanding Germ theory of diseasewe still have people thinking it's all caused by "bad vapors".

      (Just to be clear, influeza isn't transmitted through "being dirty", it's transmitted through the air by people coughing and sneezing.)

      --
      AccountKiller
    22. Re:Semi-Pandemic by eosp · · Score: 1

      So "just visiting" instead of "in jail"?

    23. Re:Semi-Pandemic by hurfy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And this is the ONLY real story here.

      If this is an average flu season at least a couple dozen kids in the US have died already from the standard A/B/whatever strains vs 1 for the swine flu.

      I'll leave you to figure out i gave an very conservative guess according to the CDC. Mexico i have no clue.

      It is still much more dangerous to cross the street for lunch, how about a banner to Stop for Pedestrians :(

    24. Re:Semi-Pandemic by daveime · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the same people who are scared shitless of shaking hands or touching a doorknob, will happily touch taps, soap dispensers and damp roller-towels in a public bathroom just for the sake of "washing their hands".

    25. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It is thought that the reason older adults aren't affected as much by this strain is that they might have immunity from an earlier H1N1 variant from many years ago. Nothing sinister about that. If you weren't around thirty years ago, you don't have those anti-bodies.

    26. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      At this point we're just using hypotheses and another one that I just dreamed up is that ths strain needs a certain industrial polutants to be between certain points (sweet spot) for it to be lethal. Since more people have caught it, and more people have died from it in Mexico, this is also plausible, since the polution levels are easily higher there than in the US and Europe. I say plausible, but very unlikely, as I just came up with this halfassed idea. But if it ends up being true, I want credit!

      If the claim is true that the deaths in Mexico are skewed towards young and middle-aged adults, then your hypothesis can explain a higher rate of deaths among the infected, but it cannot explain the age skew of the deaths. I.e., wouldn't pollution increase the death rate by the same factor for children, young adults, middle-aged adults and the elderly?

    27. Re:Semi-Pandemic by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not. That was the 1920's flu and studies of that are still not 100% confident that it wasn't a mixture of pre-bacterial medicine (much less viral) leading to some very ineffective treatment that led to much of the spread.

      This flu has been killing the old, the young and the very poor. 36,000 people die of the plain old, hum drum, non-news worthy flue every year. This is no different other than the media blitz. Something interesting happens it will all go away almost imediately....

    28. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Meski · · Score: 1

      It's funny how the same people who are scared shitless of shaking hands or touching a doorknob, will happily touch taps, soap dispensers and damp roller-towels in a public bathroom just for the sake of "washing their hands".

      - soap dispensers: before you start washing hands
      - tap: infrared activated
      - towels: paper towels
      - door: well, there often is no door after the handbasin section of a public toilet

      Realistically though, if you go to take a leak in a toilet, and wash your hands, they might end up dirtier if you handle taps, doors, roller towels than just your cock. YMMV :)

    29. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Does anyone know why there isn't enough antiviral flu medication to go around? Is it scarcity of raw materials, unreasonably low tolerances for variation leading to tight quality control in manufacturing? If so, I can understand fully.

      But if one vial of antiviral medication is denied to someone due to anything resembling an IP issue... well let's just say it would be time for a revolution.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    30. Re:Semi-Pandemic by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Well for you information in my country we already have bought 200.000 tamiflu doses and 10.000 for children, even if we haven't find any confirmed case, theres a probable girl infected coming from a trip to Mexico they sent the test to US for analysis and that was Monday by now we would know, but not.. the media is playing THE SAME GAME in every news channel I've seen in the last days in the whole S. America, they are asking us to wear masks and buy a lot of cleaning stuff just to be "sure". Prevention is good and all, but even here? the closest infected maybe over 5000Km.. people "meek and obedient" (bonus points if you catch the pun) is buying the stuff.

      This post is just to rectify you about third world not having medicine because, in fact ROCHE is doing a great PR-Marketing job around here, they have a lot of air time in the news, well is not freely sold over the counter but the government bought a lot of it, it was needed! you might say, the fact is that we have already had that medicine in stock being a tropical nation, it's a generic (oseltamivir) made by ROCHE. btw I Googled Tamiflu and the first result was "Roche have satisfied all the world demand for Tamiflu" further search for "roche tamiflu demand" found a lot of mixed messages.

      I hope some random Anon hac..bumps with the fucking information and we can call that the day of the end of pharma bad practices. That would be epic. If it bleads IT LEAKS.

    31. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      It it is most dangerous to those with strong immune systems because of the potential for cytokine storms Which is pure speculation at this point. The truth is nobody knows why it's mostly killed young people so far. Pointing to a cytokine storm as the cause is possible, but very misleading.

      No it's not; read up on the Spanish flu of 1918-1920, this strain is very similar and is functioning in exactly the same way.

      congratulations, you've just denied speculation on the grounds which prove speculation. yes, its very similar, therefore you're speculating that there is the potential for cytokine storms. until there is documented evidence of something, it is by definition speculative. thus far, there has been no such documentation.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    32. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      His idea is akin to exploding gas vapor: too little in the air and it just burns well, over-saturate the air and it just burns, or may not burn at all. But if you get just the right mix of gas vapor in the air, it's explosive.

      He's applying that concept to the age issue and industrial pollutants, like the pollutants are some sort of catalyst: Not enough pollutants and the virus can't do its thing, too many pollutants and the virus suffocates. Just the right amount though, and it thrives.

      If this hypothesis has any merit, you'll see different age range averages for different countries that correlate to the relative polution.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    33. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      you dont know that a Cytokine storm is what we're seeing here, and while time will tell, and it very well may be, this idea is at this point theory and speculation. science can work on theory, reality cannot. in theory credit default swaps were like free money, in theory there were WMDs in Iraq... i'll leave it at that.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    34. Re:Semi-Pandemic by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      An interesting fact about the 1918 pandemic is that India was very heavily hit - moreso than other countries. This might suggest a potential genetic factor playing into the virus's lethality and virility there (likewise, in Mexico now), as well as a possible contradiction to the immune system weakness being a benefit for a virus like this (though I am uncertain how 3rd World India was at the time).

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    35. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      agreed. touch nothing but your zipper and genitals and all is well. unless of course you have some form of VD, but then hey, your're already infected with something worse than the flu so dont give me a syphilis handshake. also most (if not all) bathroom doors open outward, use your foot to open the door.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    36. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      [citation needed] you must work for fox news

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    37. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      Call the CDC and the WHO i'm sure tehy'd llike to know how you concluded that there is a cytokine storm in effect here.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    38. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Khyber · · Score: 3, Interesting

      God I love my immune system and genetic oddities. I'm one of the few people that has the natural genetic resistance to HIV (descendant of Black Plague survivors) and my immune system is so strong I haven't touched a flu shot in over a decade and rarely get sick to begin with.

      I won't need to be rich to survive! I just keep up my filthy habits that reinforce my immune system and laugh at the rich that need medication. As George Carlin said quite accurately: "Tempered in raw shit."

      Yes, I used to play in sewers, quite often. Blowing shit up and hearing the reverberations go for minutes was a fave pasttime.

      Evolution in action, folks. Watch closely!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    39. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Production for the "reserve" has been going full tilt since 2005. There are 15 million courses (not doses) available in the U.S.

      I hate big pharma and crappy IP law, too, but... Uncle Sam picked up the tab for the manufacturing, and the companies here that have the ability have been cranking them out full-speed for a few years now.

      Also, it's almost unimaginable that the U.S. population is going to need more than that, all at once. The Spanish Flu killed in waves, and had an estimated mortality rate of 2.5-5%, of the estimated 20% of the total population that got it. That's still 50-100 million people killed, which is horrible, and some areas had higher infection rates than others. But the mortality numbers can be confusing... see Case-Fatality.

      So... in perspective, that we have any anti-virals at all is a huge advantage over those poor people in 1918-1919.... That we have stockpiles of millions of courses of it should be comforting to you. It is terrifying and this has the potential to be the most horrible thing our generation sees in our lives, but we do have a giant world public health machine that is ready to rock.

    40. Re:Semi-Pandemic by eosp · · Score: 1

      it was a monopoly reference, if you didn't get it.

    41. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      There are ~300,000,000 people in the US. If an antiviral regime costs $150, that would mean you'd need $45 billion dollars just to buy the inventory. That's probably why we don't have it stockpiled.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    42. Re:Semi-Pandemic by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Why would people in India, exposed everyday to all manner of unhealthy microorganisms, have a weaker immune system than your average anti-bacterial soap using, immunised against everything possible, Americans?

    43. Re:Semi-Pandemic by dgatwood · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IMHO, it is several months too early to definitively conclude that this attacks healthy people harder, whether by cytokine storm or otherwise. Right now, all the people getting hit are young people because this is the very first wave of the illness. People who are most mobile and most social are most likely to be exposed first, so that's who we're seeing getting sick right now.

      Almost all the people in the U.S. who have gotten sick are schoolchildren, but that's because they are the most mobile, once again. If you look at that in isolation, you might erroneously conclude that school-aged people in the U.S. are more vulnerable, when in reality, they were merely the first to be exposed.

      Only when you look at the data over a long period of time in aggregate can you say for certain that it hits younger people harder. In a few months, if the pattern holds, then we know this resembles bird flu in its behavior. Initially, though, it could just as easily be blamed on mobility, greater probability of living alone (and not seeking health care early enough), or any number of other causes that have nothing (directly) to do with age.

      The more interesting question, IMHO, is why there have been no U.S. deaths yet except for a small Mexican infant visiting this country. There are several possibilities:

      • selection bias---often during the early stages of an outbreak, only the most serious cases get noticed because people ignore a mild case of flu. If only a few percent of all the swine flu cases in Mexico were actually reported, the numbers make a lot more sense.
      • better medical care---Mexico did have shortages of flu medications initially, and this may have cost lives.
      • better sanitation---Mexico has many areas with poor sanitation. People in those areas could easily experience much greater bacterial exposure there than they might experience in other places. Since deaths among young people from flu are generally caused by secondary bacterial infections, this could increase the risk significantly.
      • better nutrition---Mexico has a much larger percentage of population living below the poverty line. Poor nutrition can contribute significantly to viral susceptibility.
      • surprise---Initially, people didn't expect this sort of outbreak and this were less likely to treat this as a serious disease. Delayed treatment can sometimes make the difference between life and death.
      • genetic immunity---Although most people these days are mutts genetically, Hispanic people do tend to have significantly greater genes from Spanish and Aboriginal American peoples than, for example, your average Caucasian does. Much as some descendants of plague survivors show immunity to HIV, it may be that some virus(es) that people were exposed to hundreds of years ago may have weeded out people with greater susceptibility to this virus in the ancestors of Caucasian populations, but not in the ancestors of Hispanic populations
      • false positives---The number of swine flu confirmed deaths seems to be dropping. The latest I heard was 8, down from 20 two days ago. It is very possible that the tests initially used to determine the cause of death were wrong. It is also very possible that the person was exposed to swine flu but was sick from something else entirely. For example, somebody might get Ebola and on his/her death bed, might get exposed to swine flu. Guess which one killed that person....

      It's way too early to say much about this so far. Right now, there's a lot of speculation and precious little accurate data.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    44. Re:Semi-Pandemic by dtml-try+MyNick · · Score: 1

      There is no reason to stockpile a regime for every citizen in a country. Not everyone gets sick at the same time.

      Most experts agree that in a worst case scenario about 30% of the population will get sick at *some* point.
      Some being a point in time in about a 2 year timespan.

      So they only need to stockpile a small amount of anitvirals, the rest is produced as the disease goes slowly through society

      --
      Life starts at the end of your comfort zone.
    45. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Toonol · · Score: 1

      The germ theory of disease is what led to washing hands before birthing children and operating, I believe? Of course hygiene is VASTLY important in reducing the spread of disease, and that is one of the primary reasons epidemics are much worse in poverty-stricken countries. Surely you don't dispute that?

    46. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

      Rats, flies, fleas are all carriers of disease so having a clean house, removing sewage etc are all massive steps towards reducing the prevalence of disease. So the notion of keeping clean = keeping healthy is not silly. Its certainly not the only issue involved, but it goes a long way.

      --
      Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
    47. Re:Semi-Pandemic by houghi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is still much more dangerous to cross the street for lunch, how about a banner to Stop for Pedestrians :(

      The active word is still and we must see that it stays that way. When a person gets killed while crossing the road, he does not let 8 others cross the road to get killed and who then force others to get killed crossing the road.

      The problem is that we do not know how dangerous it could become. 1 or even 100 cases (or more?) cases can be easily controlled and if that means 100 or 1000 people dying, that means nothing.

      Look what happend in 1918 It is estimated that anywhere from 20 to 100 million people were killed worldwide. 20 million (when looking at the low numbers and not calculating a higher world population) would be a tad more then people who get killed crossing the road.

      So we must not look at what happend, but what might happen. We just do not know how dangerous the wolf is and if we should cry wolf.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    48. Re:Semi-Pandemic by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Just to share what little additional (potential) insight I may have: I have a couple friends from Mexico who go to school with me. They told me that, in Mexico, people wait until they are very, very sick in order to seek medical care.

      This may explain the higher death rate in Mexico than in the US.

      Such a theory is bolstered by the news today out of Mexico City that the death toll has decelerated over the past 24-36 hours. The suggestion from doctors there is that, now, everyone is seeking medical care as soon as they have an inkling of a suspicion that they may have swine flu.

    49. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Zoxed · · Score: 1

      > Translated: People with excellent immune systems are more likely to die than those with weaker ones.

      A truly cruel irony.

    50. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Rigrig · · Score: 1

      I'm sure someone will soon edit the page to reference this source.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    51. Re:Semi-Pandemic by aetherworld · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, the virus strikes people with healthy immune systems, and the causes of death are an immune system overreaction. Translated: People with excellent immune systems are more likely to die than those with weaker ones.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytokine_storm

      ACTUALLY, you should read the article you're citing:

      Recent reports of high mortality among healthy young adults in the 2009 swine flu outbreak has led to speculation that cytokine storms could be responsible for these deaths.[6] However, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC) has indicated that symptoms reported from this strain so far are similar to those of normal seasonal flu,[7] with the CDC stating that there is "insufficient information to date about clinical complications of this variant of swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus infection."[7]

    52. Re:Semi-Pandemic by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I.e., wouldn't pollution increase the death rate by the same factor for children, young adults, middle-aged adults and the elderly?

      Maybe? I have no idea - I pulled the hypothesis out of my ass just to come up with something that sounds plausible, would explain why the deaths seem to hit in the 18-40 group and would explain why it's bad in Mexico but not elsewhere.

    53. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      (Just to be clear, influeza isn't transmitted through "being dirty", it's transmitted through the air by people coughing and sneezing.)

      Often, it's transmitted when someone coughs/sneezes on some surface, some poor loser touches the surface and then feeds his face with his now germy hands. If he'd washed his hands before he ate, he wouldn't have gotten Patient X's bugs.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    54. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      Also, rich people tend to be clean; that may just save them after all.

      What about the ones who are filthy rich?

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    55. Re:Semi-Pandemic by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Just to share what little additional (potential) insight I may have: I have a couple friends from Mexico who go to school with me. They told me that, in Mexico, people wait until they are very, very sick in order to seek medical care.

      For young people, that attitude is doubly true, which further supports the theory that this may peter out in the medium to long term and become more like the seasonal flu (but out of season) at least in terms of its pathogenicity.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    56. Re:Semi-Pandemic by TheSync · · Score: 1

      If this is an average flu season at least a couple dozen kids in the US have died already from the standard A/B/whatever strains vs 1 for the swine flu.

      The difference is that influenze strains that start in Asia usually give six months of warning before they become circulating widely in the US, enough time to put together a vaccine for the particular strain and to vaccinate those most medically at risk.

      If it starts in Mexico, there may be much less time to develop a vaccine, so the death rates will be higher among those who are at risk.

    57. Re:Semi-Pandemic by Cederic · · Score: 1

      They don't, they have a stronger immune system. Hence being killed by the immune system over-reacting.

      Also the suggested cause of the deaths in Mexico.

  4. The who by thedogcow · · Score: 5, Funny

    ""Late in the afternoon on Wednesday, the WHO raised the pandemic threat level for H1N1 "swine flu" to 5."

    Wow. I knew they had good music but I did not know Peter Townshend was in charge of changing pandemic threat levels.

    --
    Yes! I listen to NYC Speedcore and do math at 3AM. I suggest you try it too.
    1. Re:The who by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      Evolution of my poor reading compression:
      first glance "Late in the afternoon on Wednesday, WHO raised the pandemic threat level from H1N1 "swine flu" to 5?"
      my thought "What scale goes from H1N1 to 5? let me re read that"

      second glance "The WHO raised the pandemic threat level for H1N1 "swine flu" to 5."
      My thought "The WHO did this as some publicity stunt? Are they even together/alive any more? What's Slashdot think, "

      "heh he had a similar thought I should reply to that"

      "ok now I'm going to far"

      "I should spell/grammar check this. Ehh never mind."

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:The who by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Funny

      If Spinal Tap was in charge the pandemic threat level would go to 11.

    3. Re:The who by flydude18 · · Score: 1

      It wasn't the band who raised the pandemic threat level, it was the guy who's on first.

    4. Re:The who by Cazekiel · · Score: 1

      Dagnabit, you beat me to it, lol.

      --
      You want to know how to help your kids? LEAVE THEM THE F*&K ALONE. --George Carlin
    5. Re:The who by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 1

      If Spinal Tap was in charge the pandemic threat level would go to 11.

      That's not funny. Their drummer died from the pig flu.

    6. Re:The who by TheDarkener · · Score: 1

      If Antrax was in charge, the disease would be called "The Cow Cold". But that's a different band all together.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  5. not easy to know how to respond by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

    I read an article a couple days ago, apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it, encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu. So the correct path of action is not always clear, how far should you go to try to prevent this? Wall Street Journal has an interesting article dealing with these issues.

    As for me, being young and healthy, looks like I'm about to roll one of my d20. Whatever happens happens, I'll enjoy it to the end.

    --
    Qxe4
    1. Re:not easy to know how to respond by clang_jangle · · Score: 1, Troll

      I read an article a couple days ago, apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it

      The U.S. didn't stop it, it just never materialized. Like the bird flu scare they were trying to sell just recently. ISTR the CDC says 36,000 people die in the U.S. yearly from ordinary flu, and so far one person in the U.S. has died from this "swine flu" -- and that was a two year old Mexican national in Texas. But surely this scare is working out well for the health care industry...

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    2. Re:not easy to know how to respond by DragonWriter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I read an article a couple days ago, apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it, encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu.

      That's not really the right comparison to judge a "problem" with the course of action. It would clearly be, in retrospect, the wrong decision if more people died of the vaccine than would have been expected to have died from the flu had the vaccination not been carried out, but the fact that more people died of the vaccine than died of the flu when the vaccination was carried out does not appear to be a valid basis, on its own, for criticism.

      Otherwise, a vaccination program that prevented all deaths from a disease (even if, unchecked, it would have been expected to kill billions) would be the wrong decision if even one person died from the vaccine, a result that is clearly ludicrous.

    3. Re:not easy to know how to respond by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Given the relatively tight control and small numbers of infected, quarantine is the obvious answer. Of course we would have to send military into Mexico since their communications networks do not reach everyone and their general educational levels are pretty abysmal in order to secure an effective quarantine, but at least in the U.S., it can potentially be controlled quite well and I'll bet that most other places will be fine as well.

      Here's what I don't get. Just as in the case of threats of terrorism and the like, they are perfectly willing to get people all panicked, but they aren't willing to do simple things like closing borders and quarantining people. It just makes me think they aren't actually serious.

    4. Re:not easy to know how to respond by fm6 · · Score: 1

      I read an article a couple days ago, apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it, encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu.

      Indeed. Between putting his full weight behind the immunization effort and pardoning Richard Nixon, Gerry Ford lost any chance of getting elected to a full term as President. And of course, if he hadn't pushed the immunization effort and people had died from the flu...

      I do wish there were some way to eliminate all the drama. It's causing all kinds of overreaction. Today, the cafeteria where I work pulled a roast pork entree from the menu. Never mind that you can't get the flu from eating pork. Nor from the other animals that carry the virus, names birds and people. That last one is not recommended for totally unrelated reasons.

      I do wish we could get rid of all these stupid "threat levels" bugs, terrorists, and other such stuff. It might seem very kewl to go all Hollywood with your communications, but it does a lot to aggravate the overreaction. If you want to tell people they need to get their pandemic safeguards in place, why can't you just say that? This THREAT LEVEL 5 nonsense is stupid.

    5. Re:not easy to know how to respond by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's like the people that believe we wasted time and money on the Y2K problem, because there was huge disaster. They just don't get that the time and money was what prevented the disaster from happening.

    6. Re:not easy to know how to respond by theNAM666 · · Score: 1

      The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu.

      You see that as a problem? Consider the sum value for "total deaths" 'under the curve in the graph of the opposite scenario(s).

    7. Re:not easy to know how to respond by cdrguru · · Score: 1

      From a public relations standpoint it is impossible to say how many people would have died if there were no vaccinations. There is the sole fact that people died as a result of the vaccinations.

      Without that tidbit of information, nobody knows if vaccinations helped or hurt. But you can bet the media and goverment critics were out in force saying how many people died as a result of the government-supported vaccination program. Thus, President Ford killed people. Simple, really.

      This is identical to the situation where if it snows and you shovel your walkway anyone falling can sue you because you modified the snow. If you just left the snow there and someone falls it is an act of God and there is nobody to sue. So for a very long time in Chicago few businesses and almost no residences in many areas shoveled snow because it could get them sued.

      You can safely assume there will be no government-supported vaccination program, regardless of how badly it seems to be needed. All Mr. Obama needs to do is look at the history and decide if he wants to be known as a murderer, like Gerald Ford was known. I doubt it, heavily. Therefore there will not be any overt government action towards treatement.

      And we can't behave in a discriminatory manner, so no closing of borders or stopping flights from Mexico. In Phoenix this is a big deal with something like 19 flights a day coming in. That is like 1900 people a day landing in Phoenix that have a high probability of being exposed.

    8. Re:not easy to know how to respond by Kryis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sadly, when you take into account incubation time, it can be very difficult to contain something like the 'flu. The virus is out in the world, not just mexico. Anyone an infected person comes in to contact with between them contracting the virus and being diagnosed could potentially pick up the virus themselves.

      Even if you totally closed off Mexico right now, there are sill infected people that have already left the country, and are in contact with the general population of whatever country they are in right now. The WHO have already said that this is past the point that it can be contained. We just have to hope that this doesn't turn out to be the super-deadly virus the media claim it is.

    9. Re:not easy to know how to respond by againjj · · Score: 1

      This is identical to the situation where if it snows and you shovel your walkway anyone falling can sue you because you modified the snow. If you just left the snow there and someone falls it is an act of God and there is nobody to sue. So for a very long time in Chicago few businesses and almost no residences in many areas shoveled snow because it could get them sued.

      Urban legend. I googled the four words "chicago shovel snow sue" and got three links in the top four that quoted the Chicago municipal code (10-8-180 "Snow and ice removal" and 10-8-190 "Liability for civil damages") which states as follows:

      10-8-180 Snow and ice removal.

      Every owner, lessee, tenant, occupant or other person having charge of any building or lot of ground in the city abutting upon any public way or public place shall remove the snow and ice from the sidewalk in front of such building or lot of ground.

      If the sidewalk is of greater width than five feet, it shall not be necessary for such person to remove snow and ice from the same for a space wider than five feet.

      In case the snow and ice on the sidewalk shall be frozen so hard that it cannot be removed without injury to the pavement, the person having charge of any building or lot of ground as aforesaid shall, within the time specified, cause the sidewalk abutting on the said premises to be strewn with ashes, sand, sawdust, or some similar suitable material, and shall, as soon thereafter as the weather shall permit, thoroughly clean said sidewalk.

      The snow which falls or accumulates during the day (excepting Sundays) before four p.m. shall be removed within three hours after the same has fallen or accumulated. The snow which falls or accumulates on Sunday or after four p.m. and during the night on other days shall be removed before ten a.m.

      (Prior code  36-19)

      10-8-190 Liability for civil damages.

      Any person who removes snow or ice from the public sidewalk or street, shall not, as a result of his acts or omissions in such removal, be liable for civil damages. This section does not apply to acts or omissions amounting to wilful or wanton misconduct in such snow or ice removal.

      (Prior code  36-20)

      Source: http://www.amlegal.com/library/il/chicago.shtml

      One person noted that they believe that the legend came about after a high-profile case of a business being sued because it allegedly did not clear snow properly.

    10. Re:not easy to know how to respond by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 1

      apparently there was a swine flu outbreak in 1976, and the US was quite proactive in stopping it, encouraging everyone to get vaccinated. The problem came when more people died from the vaccine than from the flu.

      So much for the "better safe than sorry" crowd, eh?

      As for me, being young and healthy, looks like I'm about to roll one of my d20. Whatever happens happens, I'll enjoy it to the end.

      IIRC fatality rate is 5% - so get more than a 1 on that roll and you are fine.

    11. Re:not easy to know how to respond by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      There are lots of courses that can be taken that have relatively few negative effects. Things like telling people to stay home for seven days when they might have been exposed, and getting *everybody* to wash their hands. Those things are reasonable, and have relatively little negative impact.

      On the other hand, lots of overhyped news reports with 20 point type describing the coming pandemic is *not* what we should be doing.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    12. Re:not easy to know how to respond by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      compare those curves to the "not flipping out curve" i'll draw it below


      ______________________________________





      i perfer this one.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
  6. The WHO just raised it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Nigel Tufnel: You see, most organizations, you know, will be warning at ten. You're on ten here, all the way up, all the way up, all the way up, you're on ten on your warning. Where can you go from there? Where?
    Marty DiBergi: I don't know.
    Nigel Tufnel: Nowhere. Exactly. What we do is, if we need that extra push over the cliff, you know what we do?
    Marty DiBergi: Put it up to eleven.
    Nigel Tufnel: Eleven. Exactly. One warninger.

  7. Salshdot is in trouble by eclectro · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows nerds are pigs.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  8. Doesn't scare me at all by mcrbids · · Score: 5, Funny

    The media can do what they will with this non-story.

    I'm safe - I don't believe in that e-vo-lution crap, so this new disease could not have evolved from swine! It's all just pig nonsense.

    I'm going back to prepare a round of raw bacon sushi!

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    1. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by maxume · · Score: 2

      Mmmmmh. Trichinosis.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichinosis

      (Actually not that likely and not that deadly, but still not that awesome)

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      WARNING: Parent poster is too intelligent to understand sarcasm.

    3. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

      Eat all the bacon sushi you want and you won't die of swine flu.

      The intestinal worms will make you *want* to die, though.

      --
      The cake is a pie
    4. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by blueskies · · Score: 1

      They've traced swine-flu to undercooked bacon. That's the only thing all of the victims had in common. Feel free to ride public transportation, just watch out for bacon bits.

    5. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by ChromaticDragon · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sigh...

      If only this were just funny.

      I actually had this conversation with a friend a year ago or so. Of course, they didn't express a desire to relish in raw pork. And it was related to the Bird Flu. But pretty much dead on the same.

      Their reasoning was that Bird Flu wasn't going to be an issue because it couldn't "evolve" the ability of human-to-human transmission because... evolution was a bunch of nonsense. And the media had lost interest by that time so my friend thought it had all just been overblown.

      But H5N1 (Bird Flu) hasn't gone away at all. This H1N1 (Swine Flu) may be bad; it may not. But even if it has low mortality rate, if it spreads quickly far and wide, it may increase the chance H5N1 picks up human-to-human. That would be very bad indeed.

    6. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by mcrbids · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a side note - I didn't write it to be funny, I wrote it to make a point.

      Sometimes the best way to make a point, though, is to be funny about it. Witness Stephen Colbert.

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    7. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by Shikaku · · Score: 2, Insightful

      http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/key_facts.htm

      Can people catch swine flu from eating pork?
      No. Swine influenza viruses are not transmitted by food. You can not get swine influenza from eating pork or pork products. Eating properly handled and cooked pork and pork products is safe. Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160ÂF kills the swine flu virus as it does other bacteria and viruses.

      Thanks for tanking the pork prices with your misinformation though. Lots of pork for me to eat!

    8. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

      Sigh...

      If only this were just funny.

      I actually had this conversation with a friend a year ago or so. Of course, they didn't express a desire to relish in raw pork. And it was related to the Bird Flu. But pretty much dead on the same.

      Their reasoning was that Bird Flu wasn't going to be an issue because it couldn't "evolve" the ability of human-to-human transmission because... evolution was a bunch of nonsense. And the media had lost interest by that time so my friend thought it had all just been overblown.

      But H5N1 (Bird Flu) hasn't gone away at all. This H1N1 (Swine Flu) may be bad; it may not. But even if it has low mortality rate, if it spreads quickly far and wide, it may increase the chance H5N1 picks up human-to-human. That would be very bad indeed.

      Micro vs. Macroevolution; there is a difference, and as you saw there are plenty of people who don't know the difference...
      Many (most) (all educated) Christians don't have a problem microevolution....

      *Not talking about size by the way. Just because it is small does not make it "micro" evolution...

    9. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

      Mmm... raw bacon sushi. Sounds as good as raw chicken sushi - finger licking good.

    10. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by Alexandra+Erenhart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160ÂF kills the swine flu virus

      Good! now I know what to do if I get swine flu!!

      ... oh wait

    11. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by bemymonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Cooking pork to an internal temperature of 160ÃF kills the swine flu virus as it does other bacteria and viruses."

      So undercooking it (=under 160 deg F), like the blueskies said, _can_ lead to infection...

    12. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Steven Colbert's always-sarcastic style grates on you after a short while, though. You kind of wish he'd just actually say what he fucking believes.

    13. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Micro vs. Macroevolution; there is a difference

      A made up one, at least...

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    14. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Bah. it was supposed to get +1 funny. If you are on slashdot and aren't educated about the flu, you deserve some mis-information.

    15. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      >Micro vs. Macroevolution; there is a difference

      Yes, it's called "time".

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    16. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      The Micro vs Macro evolution debate thing is pretty interesting, on the grouds that the biologists, the 'fundamentalists', and the 'moderate' christians all agree that that there's no such thing as Macro evolution... Yet a lot of 'moderates' still seem to think that the biologists disagree with them on this front.

      If you accept the existance of 'Micro' evolution, then what many seem to refer to as 'Macro' evolution is considered by the biologists to just be 'Micro' evolution over extended time. There are no sudden changes. Just an accumulation of drift, recombination, and some selection pressure.

      In fact, leaving the 'fundamentalists' aside, the whole evolution topic is a facade. As far as I can see, this is actually Young Earth creationists vs Old Earth creationists vs Old Earth non-creationists vs Young-Earth-created-to-look-like-old-non-created-earth-ists. And that last group seriously need a better name.

    17. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      this is actually Young Earth creationists vs Old Earth creationists vs Old Earth non-creationists vs Young-Earth-created-to-look-like-old-non-created-earth-ists. And that last group seriously need a better name.

      In retrospect, its probably the Young Earthers vs the rest. And thats one thats been running strong for a few hundred years now. Its just that they've got "Evolution" tied up in it.

    18. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by natedubbya · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you're just bitter because you got PWNED by his odd convoluted understanding of what evolution is. He is so far correct on bird flu not reaching humans!

    19. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by generic · · Score: 1

      Isn't it human to human now?

      --
      Microsoft aggravates my tourettes syndrome.
    20. Re:Doesn't scare me at all by codeButcher · · Score: 1

      Microevolution doesn't explain for instance the different number of chromosomes in different species.

      --
      Free, as in your money being freed from the confines of your account.
  9. Just a distraction by V50 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bah, we all should know this "swine flu" is actually a well orchestrated distraction from our real threat.

    ZOMBIES!

    Fear not the Swine Flu pandemic. Fear instead the imminent Zombie pandemic.

    Unless of course this is just phase 1...

    1. Re:Just a distraction by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unless of course this is just phase 1...

      Yeah, I'm afraid you have - Pink Eye. I'd give you topical medicine, but I don't wanna touch ya.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Just a distraction by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      That's just ridiculous! I've never heard such an inane...hold on there's somebody at the door.

      Brains...brains...

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Just a distraction by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      i for one welcome our Zombie flu overlords.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    4. Re:Just a distraction by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Does this mean there is an expansion coming out?

    5. Re:Just a distraction by Loquis · · Score: 1

      I'm prepared, I've read The Zombie Survival Guide

  10. sensationalistic fodder for the media by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    and for big drug companies to capitalize on, is what 99% of this is...
    Only 7 swine flu Deaths, not 152...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:sensationalistic fodder for the media by Toonol · · Score: 1

      So it's the big pharmaceuticals, not the media, that is blowing this out of proportion, doing their best to create a panic, and failing to put information in any sort of reasonable context? I'm curious how they are managing to do that, since they don't own any tv networks, newspapers, or radio stations.

      Maybe they've had an R&D breakthrough on Viral Marketing.

    2. Re:sensationalistic fodder for the media by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      you know damn well they will take full advantage of it...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    3. Re:sensationalistic fodder for the media by maxume · · Score: 1

      Governments were already happily buying essentially all of the Tamiflu that Roche can make (and a media circus probably increases the likelihood of a drug resistant pool of virus developing).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:sensationalistic fodder for the media by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      holy crap, this is actually a brilliant government bailout scheme! Taxpayer money is bailing out big pharma and we'll be blaming pigs and mexicans for years rather than the government. score +1 for the President on that one.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    5. Re:sensationalistic fodder for the media by Toonol · · Score: 1

      I'm not conspiracy minded, but if I was, I'd be far more suspicious of the government than the drug companies. Looming emergencies tend to get policy changes implemented...

  11. I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "Citation needed."

    Seriously, I see Internet doomsdayers saying this, but I don't see the CDC saying this. So, can you provide a link to a reputable source for this? I'm genuinely interested in reading one. If not, then perhaps you should stop spreading it.

    1. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Delwin · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Knara · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Mod parent up. "Cytokine storm" is the new Internet meme lately.

      With the grand WHO total of deaths being caused by H1N12009 being EIGHT, and the most well documented death so far being a 23 year old, the whole idea that this is killing otherwise healthy (a BIG assumption, this is Mexico, not the US, the health care system and environmental conditions in Mexico City is not very good in the former and absolutely terrible in the latter case) adults is isn't founded at all.

    3. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, I see Internet doomsdayers saying this, but I don't see the CDC saying this. So, can you provide a link to a reputable source for this? I'm genuinely interested in reading one. If not, then perhaps you should stop spreading it.

      The cytokine storm stuff (i.e., the claim that the virus hits healthy people harder than those with compromised immune systems) is really just an early leading hypothesis that's based on the mortality data from Mexico; the virus there is reported to have primarily killed adults 20-50. I really don't think there's any other evidence for it so far.

      There's a big puzzle going on right now in that the virus in the USA hasn't been nearly as deadly as in Mexico. From all I've read, this is being actively debated, with hypotheses ranging from flawed data about what's going on in Mexico (i.e., we only know about the most lethal Mexican cases of a much larger outbreak), to the possibility that the USA may have a milder version of the same strain so far.

      The thing to stress, however, is that the knowledge about this is still very incomplete, and evolving rapidly.

    4. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by c_forq · · Score: 1
      How about the WH fucking O mentioned in the summary.

      The ages of the victims in Mexico concern health officials. Unlike typical flu seasons, when infants and the aged are usually the most vulnerable, none of the initial deaths in Mexico were in people older than 60 or younger than 3 years old, a spokeswoman with the World Health Organization said. Pandemic flus -- like the 1918 flu and outbreaks in 1957 and 1968 -- often strike young, healthy people the hardest.

      Source: The NY Times

      --
      Computers allow humans to make mistakes at the fastest speeds known, with the possible exception of tequila and handguns
    5. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by maxume · · Score: 1

      GP likely meant a reputable source stating that this outbreak was killing by way of a cytokine storm.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Actually I've got 20 confirmed deaths although my statistics are about 22 hours old.

    7. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by maxume · · Score: 1

      That doesn't say cytokine storm, which is the interesting part of the question.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With the grand WHO total of deaths being caused by H1N12009 being EIGHT, and the most well documented death so far being a 23 year old, the whole idea that this is killing otherwise healthy (a BIG assumption, this is Mexico, not the US, the health care system and environmental conditions in Mexico City is not very good in the former and absolutely terrible in the latter case) adults is isn't founded at all.

      The WHO grand total of confirmed deaths is low because confirmation of which strain was involved in each specific case is slow. The actual number of deaths so far by the strain is almost certainly significantly higher. To put it more precisely, a large proportion of the cases that have been labeled as suspected swine flu deaths will turn out to be so.

      Also, I don't think your Mexican health care and environment objection holds. Given no other data, you would expect that to increase the number of deaths, but not the distribution of deaths across age groups. You need a stronger hypothesis: that the poor health care in Mexico increases the risk of death from H1N1 disproportionately among young adults and middle-aged adults will die from H1N1, compared to children and the elderly.

      The one thing that's sure at this point is that our information is quite likely to have very serious holes yet, however.

    9. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by camperdave · · Score: 1

      So, out of 300,000,000+ Americans, this flu has killed 8? I'll bet more people die from golf balls in a year. And for this our pork exports are plummetting?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by maxume · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1 U.S. death. A child from Mexico.

      The pork thing is unfortunate, but there is a lot of risk with a novel flu virus, so a strong reaction is the prudent thing (when the lethality picture clears up, things can relax pretty quickly).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Kryis · · Score: 1

      You could also say "So, out of 6,000,000,000+ people, this 'flu has killed 8?"

      This strain of 'flu hasn't infected 300,000,000+ Americans yet, it has only been confirmed in a very small number of cases. Currently it has killed roughly 4% of confirmed cases. Spanish 'Flu killed somewhere between 2.5% and 5%, normal 'flu normally kills much much less than 1% of all cases.

    12. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by russotto · · Score: 1

      My alternative hypothesis is that working-age people have been dying of it mostly because it's working-age people who were initially exposed to it (through some as-yet-unknown mechanism), not because they're particularly susceptible. It's just a hypothesis, though. If it holds, then as the flu spreads, the distribution of deaths should become more typical of flu.

    13. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by camperdave · · Score: 1

      This strain of 'flu hasn't infected 300,000,000+ Americans yet, it has only been confirmed in a very small number of cases. Currently it has killed roughly 4% of confirmed cases.

      So, let me see... one death is 4%... carry the one... that means that in the US there are 25 people with this flu. Again, what's the big deal? More people are going to die from the panic than from the actual disease.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    14. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by hibji · · Score: 1

      25 people so far. The funny thing about the flu is it's potential for exponential growth.

    15. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because flu viruses are particularly prone to spread (especially if it hangs around until fall and winter), and if it spreads like a normal flu in a normal season, and the high fatality rate keep up, and the , then it could be devastating.

      Obviously, there are a lot of ifs in that statement. I'd guess that the fatality rate is partially inflated due to poor conditions in Mexico, uncertainties in diagnoses, and other factors; even 1% is pretty scary though. Also, given the time of year, I'd imagine we'll have a good handle on it by the time it could get serious.

      Given all of that, the government response of tracking it, stockpiling anti-virals, and other efforts make perfect sense. All the press conferences have been pretty clear on the point that it sounds worse than it is. If the publicity makes people wash their hands more and other common-sense methods to prevent spread, so much the better.

      The only worrying part is the pork-export issues (fears which are completely unfounded from what I can tell), and general commerce limits during an already fragile economic situation. As far as the overwhelming news coverage... it could be worse, we could be hearing endless discussions of the first (arbitrary-time-period) of Obama's presidency instead. Its the news, pick and choose what you want to read.

    16. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by dc29A · · Score: 3, Funny

      Some doc posted some information on Boing Boing, they don't believe that swine flu is causing Cytokine Storms.

      Info here

      I think we'll be safe from an Aporkalypse.

    17. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by maxume · · Score: 1

      The 4% is based, at best, on incredibly thin numbers from Mexico (thin in the sense that there isn't much information about the actual number of infected patients, meaning that the denominator isn't very useful).

      As of this morning, there were 91 confirmed cases in the United States:

      http://www.cdc.gov/swineflu/index.htm

      The WHO has similar information for worldwide cases (the numbers coming out of the media for Mexico are much higher than the WHO report for confirmed cases, 150+ deaths, with hundreds infected):

      http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/en/index.html
      http://www.who.int/entity/csr/don/2009_04_29/en/index.html

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    18. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Knara · · Score: 1

      and the most well documented death so far being a 23 MONTH old

      Sorry, fixed that for myself.

    19. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Meski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When there are 1000 data points (read deaths) what do you suppose the total people *infected* with H1N12009 will be?

    20. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Meski · · Score: 1

      So, out of 300,000,000+ Americans, this flu has killed 8? I'll bet more people die from golf balls in a year. And for this our pork exports are plummetting?

      Yes. Deal with it.

    21. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Meski · · Score: 1

      For fucks sake you people are quoting Wikipedia instead of the CDC; you can't even quote wiki for a damn highschool essay but you'll trust your life to that shit? I wonder if its really spreading in mexico because they DONT have as good an immune system as we do, they don't go to the doctor as often as we do, and they don't take medicine for every sniffle like we do. No, no that doesn't make any sense at all...

      WTF do you think taking medicine for a sniffle is likely in any way to promote a healthy immune system??

    22. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      for those to lazy to glean from the article heres the relevant lines:

      " The leading theory on why so many young, healthy people die in pandemics is the âoecytokine storm,â in which vigorous immune systems pour out antibodies to attack the new virus. That can inflame lung cells until they leak fluid, which can overwhelm the lungs, Dr. Moscona said. But older people who have had the flu repeatedly in their lives may have some antibodies that provide cross-protection to the new strain, she said. And immune responses among the aged are not as vigorous." [italics mine]

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    23. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by camperslo · · Score: 1

      And for this our pork exports are plummeting?

      The apparent overreaction/misunderstanding affecting on the pork industry is even worse in some other places.
      Egypt plans to kill about 300,000 pigs

    24. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=spanish+flu
      Swine flu > cytokine storm

      Most of Mexicoâ(TM)s dead were young, healthy adults, and none were over 60 or under 3 years old, the World Health Organization said. That alarms health officials because seasonal flus cause most of their deaths among infants and bedridden elderly people, but pandemic flus â" like the 1918 Spanish flu, and the 1957 and 1968 pandemics â" often strike young, healthy people the hardest.

      While CDC may not being saying it and from the available information there isn't enough to be sure, the facts that are available clearly support GP's hypothesis.

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    25. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by xtracto · · Score: 1

      the health care system and environmental conditions in Mexico City is not very good in the former and absolutely terrible in the latter case)

      [citation needed]

      I agree on your second claim, however the Mexican health system is 100% better than the USA. See, in Mexico we *do* have a Social health system in which anyone can go and be attended without looking at their financial information and kicking them out of the emergency room when they have no insurance.

      And about the "cytokine storm", although it has not been scientifically confirmed, so far the pattern of the deaths is close to that observed in spanish flu ( see chart http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:W_curve.png , from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_flu)

      Now regarding the number of deaths, I know from a first source (a cousin is a doctor in the Mexican General Hospital (http://hgm.salud.gob.mx/) and from what he as seen, the situation is worst than what the Mexican government is trying to paint.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    26. Re:I'll repeat what I heard elsewhere by Xest · · Score: 1

      "Mod parent up. "Cytokine storm" is the new Internet meme lately."

      That's because it sounds like something an evil wizard would summon above his enemies and would fit right into an RPG, this makes it attractive as an internet meme.

      *Xest was killed by Knara's cytokine storm*

  12. Um, no. by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the remarkable facts about this outbreak is that the deaths in Mexico are primarily among healthy adults between 20 and 50--similar to the profile of the Spanish flu of 1918. However, one of the yet unresolved puzzles about the virus is why the mortality figures in Mexico are proportionally so much larger than in the USA, so yeah, we just don't know what's going on yet...

    1. Re:Um, no. by Anachragnome · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Quite possibly genetic.

      It is well known that people in equatorial regions have a genetic "resistance" to malaria, but at the same time have a markedly increased incidence of sickle cell anemia. The trait that allows for one also allows for the other, but if your living near the equator, your better off with the malaria resistance.

      What may be good for the goose, ain't always good for the gander.

      As it applies here, there may be some genetic trait MORE common to the locals that provides them with some advantage for their particular environment that is ALSO a determining factor in susceptibility to the swine flu.

      One single genetic loci could be responsible for the differences in survival rates.

    2. Re:Um, no. by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      could it simply be that they have:
      1) a stronger infection
      2) a stronger immune system (due to not using 'detol' and other bullshit to sterilize *everything*, as has become popular in america+europe)

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  13. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by Kligat · · Score: 1

    Maybe you're both jackasses; the mother of the child is a jackass of the sort that has adamant beliefs about things for no good reason other than she needs something to believe to explain it, like parents that believe mercury in vaccines gave their child autism, seeing as how the tests for that farm came back negative; and I'm a jackass for joining in.

  14. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by maxume · · Score: 1

    No five pages?

    --
    Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  15. Just what is a pandemic? by night_flyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    in the US alone there are An estimated 100,000 hospitalizations and about 20,000 deaths occur each year from the plain old flu or its complications... so what is the big deal?

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    1. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by et764 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From what I've read the fears over this one are that so far it is killing a lot higher percentage than the flu normally kills. This flu also seems to kill a disproportionate number of people in the 20-50 age rage. Normally flu deaths are mostly confined to infants and the elderly.

      From a pure numbers standpoint it's not so bad. What's scary is the similarity to earlier flu pandemics. No one's really sure how bad this may get, so people are taking extra precautions.

    2. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by night_flyer · · Score: 1

      Precautions, I understand, panic, I do not...
      Unless it's "Never let a good crisis go to waste"

      --


      Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
      Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
    3. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      in the US alone there are An estimated 100,000 hospitalizations and about 20,000 deaths occur each year from the plain old flu or its complications... so what is the big deal?

      Those numbers reflect old flu strains, for which the population has significant immunity (from a combination of vaccines and antibodies from previous infections). That immunity acts as a natural brake on how much old flu strains can spread, and thus, how many people they can kill.

      The big deal is that this new H1N1 strain is one for which nobody has immunity (well, ok, except possibly people who just got it now). This means that it can spread to a much, much higher number than the older, more common strains.

    4. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by Macrat · · Score: 1

      so what is the big deal?

      MONEY!!!

      buy Tamiflu at $8 per pill! Operators are standing by.

    5. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by daveime · · Score: 1

      Girlfriend happy with your mucus ? Cheap Tam1floo delivered to your door.

      Gives the e-mail spammers something new to push I suppose.

       

    6. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      deaths occur each year from the plain old flu or its complications... so what is the big deal?

      This one has killed a few healthy adults, not just the usual "babies and old folks".

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    7. Re:Just what is a pandemic? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that pandemic isn't really defined by the virulence, just how well it spreads (and relatively suddenly). If a particular strain spreads well enough to affect 90% of the world (or continent, or country), it's a pandemic. If all it causes in 99% of those infected is a the sniffles and a bit of fever, well it's still a pandemic.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  16. And some just don't understand. by Nethead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/egypt-orders-slaughter-of-all-pigs-over-swine-flu-1676090.html

    Egypt began slaughtering the roughly 300,000 pigs in the country Wednesday as a precautionary measure against the spread of swine flu... Agriculture Minister Amin Abaza told reporters that farmers would be allowed to sell the pork meat so there would be no need for compensation.

    Yeah, what's the price of pork in a vastly flooded market. Other stories on the subject report riots by the pig farmers and also note that the WHO says that you can't catch it from eating pork. This is more a case of the non-pork eating religious majority using this as an excuse to crap on the pork eating religious minority (and 'unclean' pig farmers.)

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    1. Re:And some just don't understand. by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      what's the price of pork in a vastly flooded market.

      Delicious!

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:And some just don't understand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given that the pigs farmers are almost all part of the Coptic Christian minority, which has a history of being oppressed, this doesn't surprise me at all. As parent says, it's not about the swine flu.

    3. Re:And some just don't understand. by thewils · · Score: 1

      I'd be all for calling it "Politician Flu" if it meant they'd cull all the politicians, purely as a precaution, you understand.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    4. Re:And some just don't understand. by fastest+fascist · · Score: 1

      Either that, or just another case of got-to-do-somethingitis. Either way, makes no sense in terms of public health to me. I mean, what, do Egyptian pigs travel much? Seems more likely that the pigs there would catch this strain of the flu from humans than the other way around.

  17. Who? by Yeef · · Score: 3, Funny
    --
    I was once a horse.
  18. From a Hot Zone by mathx314 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Allow me to explain my bias before embarking on this rant: I currently attend University of Delaware. At present there are 10 unconfirmed cases among the student body. Not a big number (total student number is ~13,000), but diseases do have a tendency to spread quickly among student populations.

    What bothers me about this isn't that people are overreacting, which they are to a large extent. I don't feel the need to wander around with a surgical mask and I'm right in the middle of a hot zone. Rather, what bothers me is that people are underreacting. There seems to be a knee-jerk reaction that says that swine flu won't cause any sort of devastation; that it's not something to worry about.

    The fact of the matter is that while they're probably right, there's no reason not to take simple precautions. So long as this is going on, I'll make sure to was my hands with soap and water after using the bathroom, to try to avoid sick people, and to go to health services if I start showing flu-like symptoms. On the other hand, I hear plenty of people at school saying that they don't care, that if they get it it's "just the flu." I see a lot of people here on /. saying that this is just a media circus and just for drug companies to capitalize on. Maybe you guys are right, but what if you aren't?

    As I said, I'm biased since I'm in a hot zone, but I'd rather be safe about this than contract it.

    1. Re:From a Hot Zone by Knara · · Score: 1

      Assuming that you are correct, you want to get the flu as soon as possible, so that you either die quickly (you won't, by all evidence) or acquire immunity before the rest of the population (and it has a change to potentially mutate into something worse).

    2. Re:From a Hot Zone by erroneus · · Score: 1

      "...there's not reason not to take simple precautions..."

      Okay, tell that to our government people who aren't closing the borders and aren't taking measures to quarantine. If they report and threat and then don't do anything about it, it makes me think about the "threat level" color code for terrorism. There are no specific actions to be taken under any given state.

      Sitting in offices and telling the world how scared to get on a scale from 0 to 6 is not what I would call productive or proactive measures.

    3. Re:From a Hot Zone by FatFreeCelery · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So long as this is going on, I'll make sure to was my hands with soap and water after using the bathroom

      I hope that you continue your newly found routine even after this has gone on.

    4. Re:From a Hot Zone by khchung · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I don't feel the need to wander around with a surgical mask and I'm right in the middle of a hot zone. Rather, what bothers me is that people are underreacting.

      This attitude is exactly what scares me. See my other comment http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1215525&cid=27758051, which I quote here "I doubt its government or people is ready for the swine flu. ... I suspect it will take a much greater death toll to scare the US people to really start changing their habits."

      Hey dude, everybody wearing a mask whenever they are in public is a major part in how you stop the swine flu from spreading. Note that you wearing a mask is not to protect you (though it is good if everyone thinks that, it encourages people to wear one), but to protect everyone else in case you are infected.

      Washing your hands with soap after using the bathroom is not enough, that is what you should be doing normally already. To stop the swine flu, you need to wash your hands every single time you leave a public places, i.e. the first thing you do when you reach you office in the morning, when you return to office after lunch, when you get back home.

      The problem is it needs everyone (or almost everyone) doing it to be effective. Wearing mask and washing your hands won't help you a bit if someone else who is infected sneeze or cough right in front of you without wearing a mask, the saliva droplets could land on your eyes for all your mask can do. Doctors in hospitals need to wear face masks with special ventilation to prevent it and still it didn't work 100%.

      Not to mention your government officials and social infrastructure are most likely not prepared to close every school if a lot of cases are confirmed to be swine flu. I.e. where do the kids go if school closes? Not everyone has stay home parent to take care of them if school closes. Do your business have contingency plans to allow most of their staff working remotely from home? Or will most still be forced to go to work even in the face of a widespread flu? Will supermarkets be still open if the flu is everywhere? If not, do you have enough food stocked up to last a few weeks? Even worse would be when doctors/nurses in hospital got infected, will they stay in their post risking their lives, or will they strike and refuse to continue (this actually happened during SARS)?

      This (and more) was what we did in Asia during SARS, and it was not even as infectious as the swine flu (at least WHO thinks travel warnings was effective to stop SARS, but is not effective now against swine flu).

      It doesn't matter if swine flu kills less than 1/10 of the infected compared to SARS if it infects 100x or 1000x as many people, you are going to see death tolls in the thousands or tens of thousands if its spread is not checked soon.

      If you are in a hot zone, got look up the archives at the SARS news in Asia, see what happened there and learn how to prepare yourself. Do it for your family's sake at least.

      --
      Oliver.
    5. Re:From a Hot Zone by friedman101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      So long as this is going on, I'll make sure to was my hands with soap and water after using the bathroom, to try to avoid sick people, and to go to health services if I start showing flu-like symptoms

      it might be a wise idea to do these things even when you're not in the epicenter of a hot zone

    6. Re:From a Hot Zone by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      College is almost as bad as a preschool for spreading illness. Really there's nothing you can do other than leave. Unfortunately the billions spent by the government on disaster preparation have been siphoned off as usual, so it's difficult to determine the lethality of the virus except by direct observation. Have your friends make contact every 8 hours; if they don't, assume they're dead; if more than 5% of them are dead, go home; if more than 50% are dead stock up supplies and weapons and head for the country. Kill anyone who gets in your way, since the odds are good that they are dead already.

    7. Re:From a Hot Zone by isorox · · Score: 1

      Not to mention your government officials and social infrastructure are most likely not prepared to close every school if a lot of cases are confirmed to be swine flu.

      Maybe in your country. In the UK, we had a light dusting of snow a couple of months ago. It was fairly unusual. In my town, every single school was shut for 4 days, and most people stayed away from work, because of child care, or because they couldn't get in. Once swine flue starts killing more than die on the roads every day, then I imagine the same things will happen.

    8. Re:From a Hot Zone by shomon2 · · Score: 1

      Regardless of who (or WHO) is right - and as with many of these big threats, you should "do what you should have been doing anyway" - an ecologist mantra that you can read more about here: http://www.energybulletin.net/node/25115.

      And in this case this means resting, avoiding stress, getting lots of vitamins and above all avoiding pre processed foods and factory farmed animal meat: eat organic, locally grown food that hasn't travelled the world and been imbibed with chemicals or antibiotics that lower your own natural resistance to infection.

      The reason we have pandemics like this one, Sars, Aids or bird flu is because of 30+ years of lowering resistance to disease due to the way we eat and the practices we have.

      So if you do well with this, by August - by which time the virus may be much more dangerous - you'll have a nice resistant immune system. And if the virus disappears, you'll still have that nice resistant immune system!

      Ale

    9. Re:From a Hot Zone by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      ...go to health services if I start showing flu-like symptoms.

      You might want to hold off a bit longer than that. If I feel like it's just any other flu, I might take TamiFlu (that I would buy myself), isolate myself a bit more than normal to keep from spreading the infection needlessly, and monitor myself carefully for any unusual or exaggerated symptoms. Then I'll go to the hospital or a clinic. Even with Spanish Flu, a significant number of people suffered normal symptoms, and we don't need those people clogging the health system during a pandemic.
      For the record, I haven't bought TamiFlu, not sure if I'm going to, and I'll continue with the rest of my plan as needed.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  19. Swine Flu by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Aporkalypse!

    1. Re:Swine Flu by gbarules2999 · · Score: 1

      Dude, that was terrible. Your religious bigotry is GOING TO GET US ALL KILLED!

    2. Re:Swine Flu by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      Adi adi adi, that's all folks!

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    3. Re:Swine Flu by thegermanpolice · · Score: 1

      You mean hamageddon

    4. Re:Swine Flu by theridersofrohan · · Score: 1

      it's Parmageddon!

  20. Response From President Of Madagascar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    SHUT! DOWN! EVERYTHING!

  21. Governments are already taking huge action by scourfish · · Score: 5, Funny

    For example, Madagascar has just closed its seaport. And here I was, so close, to winning :(

    1. Re:Governments are already taking huge action by ShatteredArm · · Score: 1

      I'm not clear on your reference. Is it a totally epic game of Mornington Crescent?

    2. Re:Governments are already taking huge action by coxymla · · Score: 1
      Nope, it's Pandemic, a game where you are the virus with the eventual goal of wiping out every human being on earth and thereby eradicating your hosts... whoops.

      In the game, Madagascar has a single port and a jumpy health department; the latter will close the former as soon as the news about yourself becomes reasonably widespread. The trick therefore is to be a less deadly virus with a long incubation period, and after you manage to infect Mad. you can mutate into something a lot more deadly.

      http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/448950

    3. Re:Governments are already taking huge action by evanbd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's to Pandemic (or its sequel, Pandemic 2, which is the better game).

  22. There you go again by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn Congress, we told them to cut the pork, and the jerks bring the plague on the House instead.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  23. Still Unknown Case Fatality Rate by Baldrson · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are basically 3 regimes of Case Fatality Rate separated by about a factor of 10 each:

    1) more than 1%
    2) .1% to 1%
    3) less than .1%

    We still don't know which range we're dealing with and, uh, like, it matters.

    All it would take is to focus on a standard sample like Mexico City hospital interns, process their swabs STAT and count the deaths so far.

    Seriously, folks, where are the adults?

    1. Re:Still Unknown Case Fatality Rate by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      Yes this really is the important question. The whole "pandemic" designation seems to apply only to how readily something is spreading. So, if it turns out that this only kills, say, 1 in 10,000,000 people then who cares if it reaches pandemic status? Not that I want a flu of any kind because they are no fun, but it wouldn't matter if the whole United States got infected since statistically about 4 people would die.

      Now on the other hand if it kills 1 in 2 people it infects, then this is a MAJOR problem.

      I used more extreme examples than what the real numbers will turn out to be to make the point clear, but it stands at any level: The important factor is how fatal is it. If it is a rather non-fatal disease, then there isn't a big cause for concern. If it is a rather fatal one then there is a large cause for concern.

    2. Re:Still Unknown Case Fatality Rate by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      Seriously, folks, where are the adults?

      In private sector jobs, paying for bailouts, TARP and now this bullshit.

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    3. Re:Still Unknown Case Fatality Rate by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Seriously, folks, where are the adults?

      There are no "adults". All people are human, with human failings.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    4. Re:Still Unknown Case Fatality Rate by qw0ntum · · Score: 1

      It's not just if it kills people. There is a significant impact simply from infecting people in making them sick, in terms of health care, missed work/school/???, and even the fact that people will be living in fear that they'll get sick (however rational or irrational that fear is). You know how the point of landmines is to maim not kill, since it takes three soldiers out of action (one cause they're hurt, the other two to carry them off)? That type of situation applies here too. There's much more to it than just lethality.

      --
      'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
  24. No I'm not asking what it is by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

    I know that, I'm asking for a source that swine flu is killing via it. Not a blog post, or a speculative news media story, a source from someone like the CDC. Doesn't have to be the CDC, but a group that would know what the hell they are talking about.

  25. No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Knara · · Score: 1, Informative

    People, stop spreading this stupid, unfounded meme. The folks who have been verified to have died from H1N1 2009 have been from a country with a poor health care system and a city that is horrible in terms of air pollution and other environmental conditions. No one except the Internet whargarbl squad is stating that the EIGHT people that the WHO has verified have died from this virus(the most well documented death being of a 23 month old, the very definition of those at-risk for dying from influenza) are adult, healthy people by first world standards. Even the guy who "died from the swine flu" and gave Obama that tour, turns out to not have had "swine flu" at all.

    Yes, it is alarming in the sense that it is spreading so quickly off-season and it certainly is getting a lot of media attention, but I've seen people using the phrase "cytokine storm" who couldn't tell you what a deviated septum was last week. Knock it off already.

    1. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by eddiegee · · Score: 1

      And your dismissal of what is a little bit more than an "internet meme" does not preclude the fact that this is being taken very seriously by the WHO and other health care officials because of the rapid spread and the deaths are following the "W" mortality by age pattern that the 1918 flu did with the young and healthy hit the worst. Seeing statements like yours coupled with some of stories in the media (30,000 die of flu every year! Why is this so bad?) is undermining what should be considered a serious threat. If nothing happens, great! But if this does turn bad, I'd much rather have an early and credible response rather than a "wait and see" attitude.

      That being said, I'm on my way to a crowded restaurant on public transport to have drinks with friends. I will take the precautions that I believe are prudent. I'll wash my hands an extra time.

    2. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by theNAM666 · · Score: 4, Informative

      People, stop spreading this stupid, unfounded meme. The folks who have been verified to have died from H1N1 2009 have been from a country with a poor health care system and a city that is horrible in terms of air pollution and other environmental conditions.

      Please STOP spreading this racist, unfounded meme. While Mexico is a developing nation with a "poor" health care system, hospitals in Mexico City and elsewhere are modern, with up-to-date equipment and well-trained personnel. While pollution is a problem, not necessarily more so than in parts of New York City or LA, especially in the downtown zones under the new environmental rules. Significant advances in air quality have been made in the past 10 years, under AMLO and Ebrard.

      There is no clear, obvious reason for a higher morality rate across Mexico, including and especially in the downtown Mexico City hospitals, than in the US.

    3. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is no clear, obvious reason for a higher morality rate across Mexico, including and especially in the downtown Mexico City hospitals, than in the US.

      Well I heard that the hospital gowns in Mexico actually close in the back and cover the ass completely. If that isn't reason for a higher morality rate, then I don't know what would be...

    4. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

      I remember last time the national security officials were blabbering about WMDs in a Middle Eastern country. Didn't end well. Actually didn't end yet.

      Forgive me for being a little skeptic.

      --
      Send your spendthrift head of state this
    5. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by musicalmicah · · Score: 2, Informative

      Please STOP spreading this racist, unfounded meme. While Mexico is a developing nation with a "poor" health care system, hospitals in Mexico City and elsewhere are modern, with up-to-date equipment and well-trained personnel. While pollution is a problem, not necessarily more so than in parts of New York City or LA, especially in the downtown zones under the new environmental rules. Significant advances in air quality have been made in the past 10 years, under AMLO and Ebrard.

      There is no clear, obvious reason for a higher morality rate across Mexico, including and especially in the downtown Mexico City hospitals, than in the US.

      Really? I'd think that having minimal running water for days at a time could be a problem. Also, how about a population density that's over seven times that of New York City?

    6. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Really? I'd think that having minimal running water for days at a time [typepad.com]
      > could be a problem. Also, how about a population density [google.com] that's over seven
      > times that of New York City [google.com]?

      While those factors might partially account for a higher overall mortality rate they would not account for a high mortality rate amoung healthy adults. You would still see the classic bathtub curve with no hump in the middle.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Estanislao+Mart�nez · · Score: 1

      Please STOP spreading this racist, unfounded meme. While Mexico is a developing nation with a "poor" health care system, hospitals in Mexico City and elsewhere are modern, with up-to-date equipment and well-trained personnel.

      And even if we assume that the hospitals are bad, one would still have to explain why the deaths are (apparently) so skewed toward young and middle aged adults. The neutral hypothesis is that bad health care would increase mortality uniformly across the whole population, without age biases.

    8. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by radtea · · Score: 2, Interesting

      it certainly is getting a lot of media attention

      The media attention is due to zeitgeist, not anything in particular about the bug. We live in uncertain times, and people are scared, but mostly they don't have anything to be scared OF.

      The economy is burning, they're worried about losing their jobs themselves or that their spouse will, or that they won't be able to keep up with their mortgage or whatever. The economic meltdown is happening slowly, though, and it's hard for people to stay worried about it, so an acute threat that can absorb all of that relatively unfocused anxiety is more than welcome.

      We saw this in the late '70's and early '80's as well. One particularly remarkable case was that herpes was at one time considered a huge public health issue... until AIDS came along. While herpes is nasty, the focus on it had far more to do with generalized anxiety about the state of the world and the sexual revolution as boomers started to settle down and have families than any objective threat level.

      So after the swine flu mess passes over, expect to see other stories of this kind popping up every few months until global economic conditions start to improve, or until a real threat finally materializes (or is manufactured) to take people's minds off their mundane worries.

      It's always possible that this flu will turn out to be a real threat, although in the case of the 1918 flu there was a significantly increased death rate up to three years before: the rate of death from influenza in England and Wales was over 10,000 in 1915, and less than 6000 in the several years before.

      The war may have had an effect on this, of course, providing many susceptible human hosts to allow the virus lots of opportunities to mutate into the hellishly virulent strain of 1918. So the odds are that this isn't going to be nearly so bad, but until it's past we won't know, and that could take up to a year, given that the 1918 virus was mild in the spring and unprecedentedly deadly in the fall.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    9. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by glwtta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We live in uncertain times, and people are scared

      I wonder if anyone in the history of the world has actually considered the times they lived in to be "certain"?

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    10. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Knara · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not racist. Mexico City's infrastructure is not great on average, and it's MUCH more polluted than NYC or LA. This isn't a knock against Mexicans, it's a fact of life.

    11. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Knara · · Score: 1

      The whole POINT is that there isn't a "high mortality rate" amongst healthy adults. The infection rate in Mexico City is probably enormous, but with WHO's eye fixed on Mexico City, they've so far found only 7 deaths that are attributable to 2009H1N1.

      You can make the statement that there could be more deaths of people that don't make it to hospitals, but there's no reports of bodies in the streets and actually disastrous conditions in Mexico City. The evidence just doesn't support it.

    12. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by radtea · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone in the history of the world has actually considered the times they lived in to be "certain"?

      I wonder if anyone in the history of the world has failed to understand that some times have higher uncertainty than others?

      Or that when an ordinary person uses the phrase "uncertain times" they generally mean something like "times sufficiently less certain than usual in the perception of a broad enough range of people to be sociologically interesting"?

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    13. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      And your dismissal... coupled with some of stories in the media (30,000 die of flu every year! Why is this so bad?) is undermining what should be considered a serious threat.

      undermining what? the potential for panic? the fact of the matter is anyone is part of an early creditable response" isint gonna give a flaming ballsack for peoples opinions, they'll have actual data and i dont mean brent spinner. if this turns bad, then "an early and creditable response" will not have been made.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    14. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      mod me pedantic if you must but Mexican isint a race, to inaccurately imply that Mexican hospitals are of poor quality isint racist, its inaccurate. and for that matter the outbreak should likely bee referred to as Mexican Flu (being that Mexico appears to be the point of origin) or as H1N1 to avoid offending anyone other than astromech droids. calling it swine flu just incites mass panic and irrational action in the pork industry as noted by others.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    15. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by MeatBag+PussRocket · · Score: 1

      any time in the past seems pretty definitive to me... depending on which books you read.

      --
      i wage a holy war against the apostrophe.
    16. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Acapulco · · Score: 2, Informative

      Uhmm....I don't want to sound like a troll but...are you even a Mexican living in Mexico City?

      I am and I really don't think air quality has improved in any measurable rate, let alone "significant advances".

      Also, while I agree with you on stopping racist memes, Mexico really does have a VERY poor health care system. Those modern, well-equipped hospitals with well-trained personnel are mostly private ones, and the few of them who are actually public ones are not enough to take care of millions of patients. Sure, you might have a surgery with the best equipment in a public hospital, but that's going to happen after a VERY restrictive screening process. There's just not enough money to build a health care system efficient enough to combat a possible pandemic like the one we might be facing.

      Hell, our public health care system is in bankruptcy, quickly driving towards the cliff in part because we have more administrative personnel than actual doctors and nurses....go figure... (I can't find the link right now, but it's a well-known statistic down here)

      --
      Slashdot. Unreadable news to annoy nerds. - wonkey_monkey
    17. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone in the history of the world has failed to understand that some times have higher uncertainty than others?

      Just hang around on slashdot. you will find someone who will misunderstand almost anything.

    18. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      a country with a poor health care system and a city that is horrible in terms of air pollution and other environmental conditions.

      Please STOP spreading this racist, unfounded meme.

      When the World Factbook "spreads the meme" that infant mortality is 1.9% in Mexico and 0.6% in the USA, it has more to do with the respective levels of prenatal care than with the possibility that CIA agents are all racists.

      And, while it's true that Mexico City's air quality has improved over the past couple decades, when the World Health Organization notices that there's still more nitrogen dioxide in Mexico City than in Los Angeles, something like 4 times more sulfur dioxide, etc, that's not because they're trying to hurt Latin America.

      Ironically, one of the prerequisites to the improvements that Mexico City has already made was their ability to acknowledge the existence of a problem in the first place. Your cries of "everywhere is the same! Racist! Racist!" are not only unrealistic, they are unhelpful. You and everyone who modded you up should try to realize that, when reality does not match your beliefs, the people who merely point out the discrepancies are not to blame.

    19. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      Those problems you mention are sporadic and localized.

      As for population density there are many other places in the world with similar or higher densities and this hasn't been a significant factor in spreading sicknesses.

      And just so you know, all Mexicans working formally automatically have free medical care for them and their families, recently the government introduced medical insurance for all the people not involved in the formal economy.

      In other words, a Mexican will never be ruined by his health bills if he has been working and paying taxes.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    20. Re:No evidence for "Cytokine Storm" by glwtta · · Score: 1

      I wonder if anyone in the history of the world has failed to understand that some times have higher uncertainty than others?

      Well, sure, but the point is that most people seem to think that their times fall into that category, regardless of the actual times.

      I'm not saying the perception isn't there, I'm saying it's always there.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
  26. Re:Just a distraction - it ended Tea Parties and by PB8 · · Score: 1

    the secessionist talk in Texas--the proud Texan has switched from public talk of making 5 states out of Texas to seeking federal assistance and stocks of Tamiflu to help keep the swine flu pandemic from overrunning the Texas border. Now we are talking about the sane goodness of having sound public health policies along with preparedness planning and funding. What next? Public vaccination programs coming into favor again?

  27. Patient zero by projector · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's something vaguely comforting and familiar about medical professionals also starting their indexes at 0.

  28. Re:Patient zero by imbaczek · · Score: 1

    i don't want their bugs in any case.

  29. Most of the deaths have been young adults by billstewart · · Score: 4, Informative

    Most of the deaths reported in the press have been non-elderly adults, as opposed to the regular flu where 90% of the deaths are already-sick old people and the rest are mostly kids who are too young for flu shots. Until the latest news articles (which said that "150 deaths" was "maybe actually only 7-8 confirmed to be swine flu"), the number of deaths from swine flu was about 1% of the total number of regular-seasonal-flu deaths during the past week.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  30. suddenoutbreakofswineflu by supahdren · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To whomever tagged this with suddenoutbreakofswineflu: genius. haha

  31. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one in who's mind "Patient Zero" is irrevocably bound to Sylar from Heroes?

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
  32. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    No. This has been a perfect opportunity to scapegoat factory farming.
    It may or may not be the problem. This are PIGS we're talking about
    here. These the original "dirty farm animal". So the idea that it's
    necessarily a problem of industrialization is somewhat absurd.

    Now there are Mexican officials that are allege that Smithfield is
    not the problem and that the farm in question has tested negative
    for this. However, you can't trust any Mexican official since they're
    so corrupt. You can't really know what to trust.

    The problem down there could easily be off by a couple of orders of
    magnitude due to corruption, gross ineptitude or just indifference.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  33. Silver Ions Most Effective Antiviral Known by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    A concentrated solution of silver ions is the most effective antiviral and antibacterial substance known. Please see http://www.pstca.com/silversol/index.htm for more information. Check "Examples of SilverSol Generators" at http://www.pstca.com/silversol/use/csgen.htm I just finished updating it with somewhat detailed instructions on how to make and use your own system.

    Mike Monett

    P.S. No worries about Aryyria. Use sublingual absorption and spit most of it out.

  34. This is how it always starts.... by macraig · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:This is how it always starts.... by marcopo · · Score: 1

      Well, the pigs who developed this were hardly like this picture.

      Animals raised in unsanitary, dense conditions, in an industrial manner are a fertile breeding ground for diseases. Once in a while one shows up that can infect humans, and some of those can be transmitted between humans. Patient -1, the pigs, are no longer needed.

      Just one more of the environmental costs of industrialized meat production.

    2. Re:This is how it always starts.... by msinnh · · Score: 1

      This is the best!

  35. CDC says bacterial secondary infection was killer by billstewart · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you look at that CDC search, one article that jumps out is this one, which says that based on later research, it looks like the big killer wasn't actually the influenza itself or related cytokine storms, but secondary bacterial infections causing pneumonia among people weakened by the influenza. That's actually fairly good news, because it's much more likely that we can treat those in a hurry with existing antibiotics (as opposed to waiting 6 months to get a newly-tuned H1N1 vaccine or using the increasingly-ineffective antivirals like Tamiflu), and because quarantine also reduces the spread of bacterial infections so people who do get the flu are less likely to get the secondaries.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  36. WHO Raises Swine Flu Threat Level? by Device666 · · Score: 1

    sorry, I did.

  37. Outbreak by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I loved the scene in Outbreak, where they're showing the different biocontainment levels. Level one show people walking around without masks, it was only the people working the chemicals that hand any sort of protection. Level two had masks and rubber gloves, but people were still walking in and out without masks. Level three had people with masks, rubber gloves, white cloth body suits, and working in fume hoods. Still, doors were left open, and people walked in and out without masks. Then biohazard 4: Armed guards, security keypad and fingerprint scan, a second set of secure doors, then a rubber body suit, then an air lock, then you get to the lab.

    Hollywood!

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  38. 1918 Flu Pandemic Vector was returning soldiers by billstewart · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The vector that propagated the 1918 Spanish Flu Pandemic was soldiers returning from The World War, and people who were exposed to them, so young people with healthy immune systems were the primary people exposed to the flu, especially since they tended to be crowded together in barracks, ships, and trains where it could easily spread. So the fact that most of the deaths were younger people doesn't tell you as much as it might.

    On the other hand, the world population is much more mobile than it was in 1918 - travel's radically cheaper, and most people aren't farmers who stay home or occasionally go from their villages to small towns; everybody's on the move all the time, so it's easier for infected people to spread disease around than it was for most people in 1918.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:1918 Flu Pandemic Vector was returning soldiers by dc29A · · Score: 1

      I read somewhere that many people died of bacterial infections too, a flu that weakens heavily the immune system leaves it open to pretty much everything else.

  39. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Mexico's response has been so disorganized they have no CLUE who "patient zero" is.

    Yeah, the part I found especially interesting is, you've got this 5 year old with the swine flu, yet they test others in the town and it turns out this kid was the only person in town that contracted swine flu. Then they go and test the pig farm where they believe the kid may have contracted it from, and all the tests come back negative.

    So you've got the original infection vector, but no identifiable source it could have been contracted from, and no identifiable recipients it could have been passed on to. Seems odd to me.

  40. Right then... by oonash · · Score: 1

    Flanders! Open up!

  41. Re:Just a distraction - it ended Tea Parties and by marco.antonio.costa · · Score: 1

    Yes yes. I suppose Obama paid for all that Tamiflu out of his own lined pockets...

    Oh... wait...

    --
    Send your spendthrift head of state this
  42. Is this the end of humankind? by i_frame · · Score: 1

    Yup ..., oh well maybe, but I'm realy sure Conficker is to be held resposible for the pandemic. If only we could detect where it downloaded the swine virus from?....

  43. Don't worry, all will be worse.... by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Not to fret, V50 things will continue to go downwards - and increasingly so - thanks to NO ACTION YET taken on those factors leading to the present financial meltdown (namely financial regulation measures) which will only continue to get worse...and worse....and worse....we are quickly reaching the point of critical mass, if we haven't already arrived - in America - for offshoring of American jobs. There simply aren't that many left to offshore anymore. And eventually the college system will only cater to the super rich and foreign students as America students who can afford it will have all but disappeared - after all, who can spend a small fortune for college when loans can never be repaid?

    1. Re:Don't worry, all will be worse.... by maxume · · Score: 1

      That's some good work doom. If I had any say in it, you'd get a promotion.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    2. Re:Don't worry, all will be worse.... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      That man should've gotten a Ph D in physics, that would've sounded WAY more intimidating.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  44. Re:Leftover Bush Fearmongering plus some reality by regular_gonzalez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Can you imagine any possible news story where you would not find it relevant to bring up Bush? Let it go already, it's over.

    --
    Due to circumstances beyond my control, I am master of my fate and captain of my soul.
  45. Re:CDC says bacterial secondary infection was kill by Plekto · · Score: 2

    And as I've been saying, it's extremely likely that people with those secondary problems seek attention. And we have a ton of options to treat pneumonia and asthma in the U.S. and Europe. So far, almost none of the 90+ cases in the U.S. are proving to be fatal. We are well taught to take drugs for any serious illness by now.

    Too bad people in Africa, Asia, South America, and other places with a larger population that's more rural don't have the ability or access to deal with more than a handful of serious cases. Note - this also would apply to rural and hard to reach areas in the U.S., like Alaska. It appears that survivability is directly based upon how quickly you can get to medical help.

  46. It's OK, pandemics are natural by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 3, Funny

    And all organic.

    As a bonus, it's "green". Anyone who succumbs to this will naturally reduce their carbon footprint.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  47. Of course governments should be up in arms... by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I would think government officials should be up in arms about swine flu.. a pandemic would sweep through capital hill like a brush fire, dropping congressmen and lobbyists like sacks of flour.

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  48. Dirty Diapered Terrorist! by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Nah, we jailed that 22 month old infant!

    The almost two year old terrorist was protesting a wet diaper by crying...outside of any 'Free Speech Zone'!

    That jail time will teach this dirty diapered terrorist that you just can't just do as you please in this country!

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  49. I want the Singularity. by Sybert42 · · Score: 1

    In all seriousness, I'd rather take my chances with computer viruses.

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Re:Sensationalism. by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

    Was the flu pandemic of 1918 that killed an estimated 20 to 100 million people worldwide newsworthy?

  52. I've seen this episode... by akpoff · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Dr and Rose appear on a spaceship cunningly disguised as a planet only to find there's a mysterious disease that's killing spectacularly low numbers of people who all happen to live in the same city. Normally he wouldn't worry about it but Rose manages to get infected so the Dr raises the threat level to OMG. He works night and day to find a cure only to be forced to infect himself, die from the disease, but not really as his seemingly magic, but really explainable in materialistic terms, Time Lord powers cause him to regenerate in the form of Tom Baker.

    He draws some of his own blood with his sonic screwdriver and, treats Rose, who makes a full recovery. As a gesture of good will, and for the episode to end on a relative high note (despite Tom Baker's haggard appearance), he takes the TARDIS into a low "earth" orbit and sprays the serum into the jet stream, thus curing and inoculating most of the world. The Dr and Rose leave for better times.

    Just moments later the Vogons appear and destroy the world to make way for hyperspace bypass.

  53. Re:Leftover Bush Fearmongering plus some reality by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

    Now STFU and get on with your life.

    Can't. Not with the threat level being orange and all. Wait 'till it's yellow.

    --
    Just callin' it like I see it.
  54. Re:Sensationalism. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Initially, only in Spain.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  55. Reality check? by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    young people with healthy immune systems were the primary people exposed to the flu, especially since they tended to be crowded together in barracks, ships, and trains where it could easily spread.

    Except that the US mobilized 4.3 million soldiers and 50 million people died of the flu.

    Being crowded together could get all of those soldiers contaminated, but then each one of them would have to infect twelve other non-soldier people after being released from that togetherness.

  56. Re:Boo. by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

    I dont eat pork, care to apologize to me?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  57. Dr :WHO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess we need the help of The Doctor, and Martha Jones. If it spreads to Wales, then Torchwood can help.

  58. On the bright side by Ozric · · Score: 2

    On the bright side, due to the colossal stupidity of the public, pork prices are droping.

    In down times it is good to have some cheap meat products at the store.

    Pork, its what's for dinner. :)

  59. You are the suspect! by rosacalla · · Score: 1

    The first symptom of this flu is lack of appetite. If you feel so, you must be the suspect!!

  60. Terrible name by st0rmshad0w · · Score: 4, Funny

    Swine flu is a horrible name.

    I'm going to call it "bacon lung".

    Everything's better with bacon.

    1. Re:Terrible name by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

      You owe me a new keyboard. And a mouthful worth of rum and coke.

      -b

      Bacon lung. Genius.

      --
      No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  61. Re:CDC says bacterial secondary infection was kill by Meski · · Score: 1

    And as I've been saying, it's extremely likely that people with those secondary problems seek attention. And we have a ton of options to treat pneumonia and asthma in the U.S. and Europe. So far, almost none of the 90+ cases in the U.S. are proving to be fatal. We are well taught to take drugs for any serious illness by now.

    Regrettably, we're trained to take drugs for *any* illness.

  62. Hey! At least... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...the economic crisis is no longer.

    Right?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  63. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by Tuqui · · Score: 1

    Then they go and test the pig farm where they believe the kid may have contracted it from, and all the tests come back negative.

    They should check the birds too. Or another animals as posible vectors.

  64. Mutated Strain Fears by BlogTheHaggis · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else worried that Swine Influenza could combine with Mad Cow Disease to create the deadly "Mad Cone Flu"?

    I hear it's quite bad...

  65. Dah Quote in question by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

    "If it bleeds it leads"

    --
    Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
  66. The Who? by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    If they do a concert to aid Swine Flu victims, I hope Robert Daltrey is there.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  67. Only 91 Confirmed Cases in the US by djrok212 · · Score: 1

    With all the media hype you'd think everyone had the swine flu, but in reality there have only been 91 confirmed cases in the US. Not saying this isn't something to worry about, but it's only 91 cases in the WHOLE US!

    1. Re:Only 91 Confirmed Cases in the US by Max_W · · Score: 1
      The problem is that a virus can spread very quickly, in a geometrical progression. Like on a code lock there are only 4 digits, but a huge number of variants. Or like nuclear chain reaction.

      Think of a room fully packed with charged mousetraps.

  68. New Drinking Game! by sjs132 · · Score: 1

    New Drinking Game!

    Anytime you hear a major news media talk about swine flu, Take a drink an speak pig latin until the broadcast changes subject.

    Yep, I'm a Karma whore....

    --
    --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  69. Mod Parent Up by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    Given that the pigs farmers are almost all part of the Coptic Christian minority, which has a history of being oppressed, this doesn't surprise me at all. As parent says, it's not about the swine flu.

    Coptic Christians have it very rough in Egypt; if they are the majority of pig farmers then this is a very plausible explanation for Egypt acting so silly over this.

  70. "Phase". Not "Threat Level", not even "Level". by Merk · · Score: 1

    "Current level of influenza pandemic alert raised from phase 4 to 5"

    http://www.who.int/en/
    http://www.cdc.gov/flu/pandemic/phases.htm.

    Obviously as it spreads more, the risk is greater, but it isn't some "terror alert level" they're raising, it's the phase in the progression of the outbreak that they're tracking.

  71. banning handshakes and greeting-hugs-kisses by Max_W · · Score: 1
    Why shouldn't a UN General Assembly ban handshakes and greeting-hugs-kisses?

    I am trained microbiologist and I know what stupid habits these are. It is not only a flu, it is also a HPV (human papiloma virus), and other infections.

    If it is banned by an international law we could stop these epidemics. It can be substituted by a bow, like they do in Japan.

    By the way, what other non-contact greetings exist in other cultures?

    Politicians will never touch this topic as it may damage their rating. But still the handshakes and hugging-kissing at a meeting are medieval things, which came from the time when epidemics decimated up to 75% of population on a regular basis.

    1. Re:banning handshakes and greeting-hugs-kisses by Max_W · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Handshakes differ from, say, touching a door handle. Microorganisms are extremely vulnerable to light, air, temperature change; they like when it is wet, dark, and warm. These are the conditions more or less existing on a warm and wet human hand or face.

      As soon as viruses or bacterias are exposed to a sun light and a fresh air they began to die or at least get weakened. Some can survive only seconds of such exposure.

      We, who saw it in experiments at the microbiological laboratories, should bring this awareness and advice into societal consciousness. It is not about being unfriendly, but about changing a dangerous habit.

      There are 6 billions people on Earth now. The handshakes and greeting-hugs like sparks in a room full of a powder. It is the perfect way for viruses to spread in a geometrical progression. What is even more worse is that this European culture of handshakes and greeting-hugs spreads around the world. Indeed, why not using a bow instead?

  72. Re:CDC says bacterial secondary infection was kill by Cassius+Corodes · · Score: 1

    I think there is a drug for that! *ducks*

    --
    Control is an illusion, order our comforting lie. From chaos, through chaos, into chaos we fly
  73. Re:Kind of reminds me... by sentientbeing · · Score: 3, Funny

    You call it swine flu.

    I call it weaponized bacon.

    --

    ------
    beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  74. John Hodgman's blog provided this 1970s USA PSA by orbz · · Score: 1

    John Hodgman's blog provided this 1970s USA PSA: Too Fast For The Swine Flu

    --
    FSM, grant me the serenity to preview that which I cannot change...
  75. What do we do when it is time to panic? by anwyn · · Score: 1

    Everyone says that it is not time to panic.

    O.K. But how will we know when it is time to panic? Will President Obama make a declaration signed with the Presidential seal? How will we know?

    When it is time to panic, what should we do? Run in circles and scream an shout? Or whimper in the corner? Should we gather frogs or should we release all of our frogs?

    Where is the panic button, who is in charge of pressing it, and why have they not pressed it yet?

  76. I still prefer... by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

    The Tom Baker episodes, from the 70's. You know, before Daleks could fly? You could elude them by finding a staircase.

    BTW; The Swine Flu thing is a hoax. Only seven died.

    "A member of the World Health Organisation (WHO) has dismissed claims that more than 150 people have died from swine flu, saying it has officially recorded only seven deaths around the world.

    Vivienne Allan, from WHO's patient safety program, said the body had confirmed that worldwide there had been just seven deaths - all in Mexico - and 79 confirmed cases of the disease."
    http://www.smh.com.au/world/only-7-swine-flu-deaths-not-152-says-who-20090429-aml1.html

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  77. New twist on an old rhyme by thegermanpolice · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ring a ring of nachos
    A pocket full of tissues
    Arriba Arriba
    We all fall down.

  78. I do stop for pedestrians by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    It is the law. The law of physics. You got to come to a complete stop before you can backup and run them over again!

    What? Like you never did it!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  79. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Smithfield is quite 'well known' for its intensive pig farming techniques, let me show you a few links
    http://nationalhogfarmer.com/mag/farming_smithfield_draws_mixed/ this is from an industry site not environmentalist hippies
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4035081.stm BBC report.
    http://www.saplonline.org/pubs/Quarterly/07-56-04/07_56_4p1415.htm

    Here's an extract from the third link.

    "When biology student Dana Spinu and I visited Timisoara a few weeks before the Smithfield takeover, we found officials and academics naively unprepared for what awaited them. We were invited to Paderini, one of six Contim farms being operated by a Romanian firm, in its last days of independence before being swallowed up. In contrast to US and Polish hog factories, the operation was scrupulously clean. The effluent was pumped to sewage ponds a kilometer away; the feeder pigs had four times more room than in the United States, twice that required under EU regulations. Piglets were weaned at 36 days and took six months to reach market weight. My description of Smithfield practices--piglets weaned at 11 days and brought to market weight at 120 days, feed doped with growth enhancers and antibiotics, dumpsters overflowing with dead animals--was greeted with incredulity by company veterinarians. "Impossible! Illegal! It can't happen here!"

    Smithfield's first move upon its arrival was to fire former managers, post guards at hog factory gates, and order employees to say nothing about their work. Evidence of high level corruption was not long in coming. Local officials were ordered to keep "hands off" the company; academic critics were disciplined. Smithfield's relationship with the neo-liberals who came to power in 2005 was even more intimate. Free of interference, even exempted from EU regulations until 2012, Smithfield moved rapidly to consolidate its position, reactivating the Contim farms, and buying refrigeration and transportation companies. While the government shut down small slaughterhouses (ostensibly because of the EU), leaving small farmers with no place to market pigs, Smithfield flooded the country with pork imported from Poland and the United States.

    In July 2007, however, Smithfield encountered an opponent that it could not bribe. At Cenei, west of Timisoara, 3,500 Smithfield pigs died suddenly. The company blamed it on a heat wave, but nauseating piles of carcasses attracted the press, and the county veterinary inspectorate was forced to do its job. On Aug. 3, it discovered classical swine fever, a viral disease long endemic in Romania, among Cenei's 20,000 pigs. At this point, the "hands off Smithfield" policy came to an abrupt end. The county disease control center halted all movement of Smithfield hogs, freezing its operations; the National Veterinary and Food Safety Authority began emergency inspections of the entire Contim system. Within a few days, two more infected farms with 30,000 pigs were discovered at Igris, on the Hungarian border.

    At the same time, it was learned that 11 Smithfield farms had not even applied for sanitary-veterinary authorization and were operating in blatant contempt of Romanian law. Agency head Radu Roatus excoriated local officials and announced that the unregistered farms would be shut down. Agriculture Minister Decebal Traian Remes confirmed that all exposed pigs would be killed and incinerated, and he suggested that the company "probably" would not be compensated for them. Muzzles removed, lesser officials blamed the Americans. "Our doctors have not had access to American farms to perform routine inspections," said Timis county veterinarian Csaba Doraczi. "Every time they tried they were pushed away by the guards." It even came to light that Smithfield workers are paid so little, about $230 US a month, that the company suffered fro

  80. The press wants bad things by Barumpus · · Score: 1

    I was watching the morning news while drinking some hot coffee and almost had to sue myself. A "Doctor", qualified to discuss topics in and of the medical field, gave the following reason as to why this "Swine Flu" is so bad....

    "We know this flu to be different because the common flu typically ends in March and this one is just arriving."

    That was all the news crew decided to broadcast. Nothing about the variants of H1N1, H2N1 or even NBE1. Why not at least give an honest attempt at news instead of garbage. And people ask me why I hate watching the news and reading the paper.

  81. Re:Patient zero by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    There's something vaguely comforting and familiar about medical professionals also starting their indexes at 0.

    be even more comforting if they referred to the pig that infected them as "case -1".

  82. Re:Sensationalism. by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Was the flu pandemic of 1918 that killed an estimated 20 to 100 million people worldwide newsworthy?

    It was God showing that he could do better than WWI. This one's for Iraq and Afghanistan, so if he is acting in proportion it shouldn't be to bad.

    (well its as good as any other theory)

  83. Far searched? Hysteria control? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    I don't know, but here's my theory on this ...

    I'm trying to think sober, no conspiracies, but with the technology of today and current states of affairs..

    A lot is going on around the world with the year 2012. Hunderds of believers think the world will radically change that time;
    A lot of believers also think there will be a world with many storms and many diseases...

    Just think of the motive behind creating such virus towards the population and which they believe when you read the above two lines.
    Couldn't it be such virus could be created to fine grain control, using mass-hysteria through science? It has proven to work before.

    Or is this really a bad mix of influenza, just coming from 3 parts of the world? (Europe, North America and Asia)

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  84. At least we aren't talking about torture anymore by smchris · · Score: 1

    Mission Accomplished!

    Or, yes, it _could_ just be that Britney hasn't flashed her cooter recently and the news has to cover _something_. But I'm betting on the former.

  85. aii karamba by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Doh.

    hope border security is stopping those virus's without visa entry papers.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  86. Panic? Maybe that would be best by stanjam · · Score: 1

    Speaking as a member of a family who could be devastated by flu (two of us could easily be killed by flu and resulting pneumonia), I am pretty worried. The United States keeps saying "Be concerned, but don't panic." They say it isn't prudent to close borders, schools, etc. To my thinking, isn't this a case of money trumping safety? Sure, there aren't a heck of a lot of cases yet, but I would think the prudent thing to do would be to isolate as many cases as possible, and try to keep this from spreading with every resource at our disposal! Yes, that means border closings. Get our citizens who want to come home back, but place them in isolation until we know they are not carrying. When a case is reported in or near your community, close schools and any non vital business. Tell people to not travel anywhere that isn't necessary. Place sanitiser anywhere in public where multiple people are touching stuff. Distribute medical gloves and masks. Some would say this is overreaction, but it is really the only way to stop this from becoming a pandemic. Serious issue, and we need to treat it as such, and not put the economy above the health of citizens. In Mexico it is hitting healthy people hard, and this should be a major concern. It is quite like the behavior of the last pandemic, although it isn't spreading as quickly. We should be taking every step to stop this now before it gets so large that we can't stop it, or is this a case where we really can't stop it, so we aren't bothering? I know, I am paranoid, but facing a pandemic flu is a very scary proposition for me and my family.

    --
    Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide
  87. flamebait? by blueskies · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't want to tarnish something as sacred as a deadly virus that kills people, by naming it after an unclean animal.

    Well, i guess the Christians and Muslims make asses out of themselves, it's time for the Jews to act idiotic too.

    What i can't make fun of Jew for being stupid here? When did slashdot start protecting religion?

    1. Re:flamebait? by smoker2 · · Score: 1

      All I said was that piece of fish was good enough for Jehovah !

  88. As my Dad used to say... by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    As my Dad used to say, the news is all about "fuzz and was".

    Fuzz being slang for police, at least in the 60s/70s

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  89. Re:I raise the Swine Flu Threat Level by KC7JHO · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... and just WHO are you to be doing that?

  90. Re:"Phase". Not "Threat Level", not even "Level". by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    A /. editor let an inaccurate title through to provoke outrage at "the man". Now I've heard everything.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  91. Panic is NEVER best by ABasketOfPups · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you're panicking. That's not helpful. It's already in 11 states at least: it'll be in all of them, borders closed or no.

    If you or yours are at risk, keep in mind that regular flu kills 36,000 a year: if that didn't scare you into staying home, why should this, where the survival rate is still unknown? Take a deep breath, away from others :) and make sure your family is retentive about hand sanitizer and staying out of closed public spaces. For as long as they're at risk.

  92. DHS Response by CyberDong · · Score: 1

    It's good to see the DHS is being proactive...

    About halfway down the page:

            Anyone exhibiting symptoms is being referred to an isolation room
            where they can be evaluated by a public health official before
            proceeding to their destruction.

    YIKES!

    1. Re:DHS Response by CyberDong · · Score: 1

      Never mind... They fixed the typo....

  93. Alert by ModifiedDog · · Score: 1

    I thought I had the swine flu, but it turns out there was just a pig in my chimney.

    BTW, does 5 == orange?

  94. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by ebuck · · Score: 1

    Evolution in action. If you're not the original host to the mutation, then there's a host before you. The news is that they found the original host.

    I'm sure that there are quite a few not-quite swine flu viruses around, and that the odds of mutation are sufficiently low, and that the odds of mutation into something harmful are even lower. However, those odds compound over time to practically guaranteeing it will happen someday.

  95. Re:Kind of reminds me... by viper34j · · Score: 1

    You call it swine flu. I call it weaponized bacon.

    I almost peed myself upon reading this post...

  96. Well, I actually am a chilango. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Air quality has improved enormously. Mexico City has an objective measurement of air quality (IMECA), you can find historical data here: http://www.sma.df.gob.mx/simat2/index.php?opcion=69

    If you play with the data you will see that air quality has improved around 25% respect to 10 years ago. Anecdotally speaking you surely remember the environmental contingencies, when birds died and children didn't go to school. We haven't had one of those for long time, and now once in a while you can actually see the volcanoes surrounding Mexico City again (I just did in my last visit there a couple of weeks ago).

    But of course, you can ignore the objective data and allow your political biases to cloud your judgement.

    Also medical coverage has actually being widened to people that do not have a formal job by means of a new health insurance.

    Notice that air quality has been achieved by leftiest governments, while the medical insurance was promoted by the Federal (right wing) one...

    So Mexico may be far from perfect, but there have been improvements and to deny this is misinformed, to say the least.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  97. Re:Patient zero? Yeah, right. by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

    Yup, that pretty much sums it up how this guys and many others work here in Mexico too. It is no surprise that we are one of the countries with worst pollution on soil and rivers. Sadly, most people here thinks thas this is the way that things sould be.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  98. Re:Leftover Bush Fearmongering plus some reality by Zarluk · · Score: 1

    It shouldn't be over! He and Cheney (among ohers) should be properly judged (in Haia, perhaps).