Slashdot Mirror


What to Do With a $99 Wall Wart Linux Server

Guanine writes in with a follow-up to our discussion a few months back on the SheevaPlug: 1.2-GHz ARM-compliant processor, 512 MB DDR2, 512 MB flash, USB 2.0, gigabit ethernet, in a package the size of a wall wart, for $99. Saul Hansell's Bits Blog in the NY Times talks about a few applications for such a device, whose price point Hansell claims will drop to $40 before too long. "The first plausible use for the plug computer is to attach one of these gizmos to a USB hard drive. Voila, you've got a network server. Cloud Engines, a startup, has in fact built a $99 plug computer called Pogoplug, that will let you share the files on your hard drive, not only in your home but also anywhere on the Internet. ... [Marvell's CEO said] 'Eventually you won't see the plug. We want this device to be in your TV, your stereo system, your DVD player.'"

346 comments

  1. Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    that thought Wal Mart was selling linux servers?

    1. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      no

    2. Re:Am I the only one... by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nope. I was also very confused when I read that one server could fit into a package the size of a Wal-Mart.

    3. Re:Am I the only one... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I read "Wal Mart" at first too. W and M look similar, both with the up-down pattern, and "Wal Mart" is a more common phrase than "Wall Wart" for sure.

    4. Re:Am I the only one... by wjsteele · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would imagine that most people that saw that interprated it that way. The human brain is an amazing thing, but with the difference between M and W being so slight, it automatically jumps to conclusions based on the most common forms. There are several wyas to trip up the brain that you mihgt not even recongize. (See in line for clarifications.) Bill

      --
      It's my Sig and you can't have it. Mine! All Mine!
    5. Re:Am I the only one... by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

      Same here -- and for a moment I was *so* happy...

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    6. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wal Mart was selling linux servers? You are just being ridiculous!

      You have to get them at Sam's Club.

    7. Re:Am I the only one... by spacefiddle · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, guilty as well. Although it wouldn't be $99, it would be $96.32

    8. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Nope...I was rushing to Wall Wart to buy one until I realized there are none WallWart here were I live.

    9. Re:Am I the only one... by troll8901 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We had this discussion in February. mcgrew (92797) said:

      I hope they sell them at Wal-mart. A Wal-mart Wall-Wart would be cool!

      Imagine a beowolf cluster of OW!! OW!! STOP HITTING ME!!!

      In fact, I was secretly hoping they'll recreate that particular thread here, word for word.

    10. Re:Am I the only one... by redKrane · · Score: 1

      Funniest thing on Slashdot in a while. I'm still laughing uncontrollably, and your post is cool too.

      --
      that's my word, holla...
    11. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was thinking, I will pick one up at lunch, cool, soo disappointed.

    12. Re:Am I the only one... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Am I the only Slashdot reader who isn't dyslexic?

      Guess I shouldn't be surprised. :-|

    13. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep trying, you'll get it sooner or later.

    14. Re:Am I the only one... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's dyslexia; people read things with a quick glance, based on outlines of words and types of lines (lots of near-verticals, in this case). The $99 for a computer also suggested it from a place like Wal-Mart.

    15. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always one guy who knows everything

    16. Re:Am I the only one... by Chapter80 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      After a quick skim of the item, I jumped over to walmart.com and tried to find the item. But nooo. I even tried walwart.com.

      Then I clicked around the Marvell site to try to find out how to buy it.

      At $100, they should have a "BUY IT NOW" button on their site. They missed at least one quick sale from an impulse buyer here.

    17. Re:Am I the only one... by Mathinker · · Score: 1

      > In fact, I was secretly hoping they'll recreate that particular thread here, word for word.

      Are you comparing us Slashdotters to monkeys?!

    18. Re:Am I the only one... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Funny
      "Am I the only Slashdot reader who isn't dyslexic?"

      Dyslexics of the world Untie!!!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    19. Re:Am I the only one... by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Nope, it's now down to $91.58

    20. Re:Am I the only one... by BLQWME · · Score: 2, Funny

      on

      --
      "Nobody shoots anybody in the face unless you're a hit man or a video gamer"- Jack Thompson
    21. Re:Am I the only one... by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      No, you aren't alone. I was desperately trying to visualize a "Linux Server the size of a Wall Mart" myself.

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

    22. Re:Am I the only one... by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

      Hey now, let's not forget that Dyslexics are teople poo.

      --
      "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
    23. Re:Am I the only one... by DigitalCrackPipe · · Score: 1

      Worse, I had the exact same reaction when an article on this server came up a few months ago. Despite having already been fooled once, I didn't realize I had misread the title until I read your comment...

    24. Re:Am I the only one... by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      Call IBM, I'm sure they will be happy to sell you one!

    25. Re:Am I the only one... by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      If it helps, trying to imagine a Beowulf cluster of them isn't any easier.

    26. Re:Am I the only one... by ncc74656 · · Score: 1

      Are you comparing us Slashdotters to monkeys?!

      At least if you put a million monkeys on a million typewriters, you might eventually reproduce the works of Shakespeare. A million /.ers? Not so much.

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    27. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see what you did there...

    28. Re:Am I the only one... by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Ehm, judging from my recent search history containing gems like "sheevaplug site:walmart.com", I would say you were not the only one. Sometimes even RTF title is hard for a slashdotter...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    29. Re:Am I the only one... by Verdatum · · Score: 1

      Wal Mart actually did attempt to sell a Linux box for awhile. They figured out they could save a bunch of money by ducking Microsoft licensing fees, but not enough people wanted such a thing.

    30. Re:Am I the only one... by relaxinparadise · · Score: 1

      What makes it worse for me is that I'm sure this isn't the first time either.

    31. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats to the poster. Ive read that thing where they change up the letters and you can still read it but that always feels fake since you know there's something wrong to begin with (usually its presented horribly). You on the other hand managed to get me entirely through the passage and then blindside me. Now i actually believe that crap works.

    32. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And now you should understand that advertising works subliminally as well.
      One of the goals of Marlboro (yes I worked there) was "Visibility". So, pouring money
      into expensive Racing teams like the 3 car Indy team, NASCAR, F1, etc seems like
      a waste of money, but they have actually circumvented laws and advertised on TV.
      The fast red marlboro car wins!

      Anon because I know that they employ lots and lots of lawyers.

    33. Re:Am I the only one... by petermgreen · · Score: 1
      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    34. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's Wall-Mart mind control.

    35. Re:Am I the only one... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Is there a server that can't fit into a package the size of wal-mart?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Am I the only one... by Aranykai · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, walmart promo items always end with 88 cents. Unless they are clearance, in which case it will be 50 or 00.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    37. Re:Am I the only one... by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      Your post made me do a web search and find this: Infinite Monkey Theorem

      Quite an interesting read. I think. I don't really read. Hey, hey, stop pinching me, I'll read it! Um, it says:

      The probability of a monkey typing a given string of text exactly, as long as, for example, Shakespeare's Hamlet, is so tiny that, were the experiment conducted, the chance of it actually occurring during a span of time of the order of the age of the universe is minuscule but not zero.

    38. Re:Am I the only one... by Eil · · Score: 2, Informative

      At $100, they should have a "BUY IT NOW" button on their site. They missed at least one quick sale from an impulse buyer here.

      The link to buy it was right there in the summary and has a big magenta button on the first page that says "BUY NOW $99".

      And I also couldn't help but notice that Marvell's page for the device has a big clickable image on it that says "VISIT PARTNER PAGE TO BUY."

    39. Re:Am I the only one... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      If it requires plugging into a STD US A/C line I am not interested, but if it is running off D/C then we can talk.

    40. Re:Am I the only one... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      That's Lysdexics you insensitive clod!

    41. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently saw an Arizona license plate "NNMMNMN" or something like that.

    42. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's stupid, we evolved from monkeys so we've already proved the theorem wrong because the monkey called Shakespeare produced Hamlet.

    43. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brain always freezes and stops when it hits one of those points in text. That last sentence took me a full ten seconds to read.

      Insensitive clod.

    44. Re:Am I the only one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be $96.32 bearing a sticker that read
      "NOW UNDER $97!!!"

  2. I've got one by Nursie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't really see the revolution here - it's a small headless server. A bit like an NSLU2 only a lot faster. They're pretty cool.

    They also seem to suffer from dodgy NAND memory, which is a shame, and booting from SDHC is not yet very well supported. That said, they come with Ubuntu server pre-installed and it was trivial to turn it into a media server.

    1. Re:I've got one by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Like a hacked Appletv too.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    2. Re:I've got one by Nursie · · Score: 1

      I suppose so, though the Apple TV has various video outputs, this doesn't, and (correct me if I'm wrong) probably has a much large power draw. Mine's a media server in the sense that it serves media to other machines, like the PS3 and Xbox360.

    3. Re:I've got one by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      booting from SDHC is not there yet but booting from SD is solid.

      I've been using these for weeks now. also the dodgy flash can be overcome by running a full scan on it and marking the bad spots, I prefer running off SD though.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:I've got one by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I was just thinking along those lines. I have an old Apple laptop with a dying HDD that is spending its last days acting as an occasional media server for movies and stuff downloaded off the internet. If only this wall-wart had an HDMI output, it would make a perfect drop-in replacement if combined with a biggish external HDD.

      Oh well, I guess one day it's bound to happen. I can wait.

    5. Re:I've got one by moon3 · · Score: 1

      This is the future for dedicated server application, where the real bottleneck is the network card and not the CPU. ARM is certainly gonna be huge in the near future. Considering prices and power consumption ARM has a clear edge over AMD/Intel, the only thing holding the ARM floodgates closed is that production OSes and systems that are not ready for the ARM (just yet).

    6. Re:I've got one by grub · · Score: 1


      Think I'll nail several power bars to some plywood, hook up a few dozen of these wall-warts and call the ugly colossus "Lemmy".

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    7. Re:I've got one by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Production OS?

      I've been running Debian on ARM for a few years now, it's great :)

    8. Re:I've got one by eap · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't really see the revolution here - it's a small headless server. A bit like an NSLU2 only a lot faster. They're pretty cool.

      They also seem to suffer from dodgy NAND memory, which is a shame, and booting from SDHC is not yet very well supported. That said, they come with Ubuntu server pre-installed and it was trivial to turn it into a media server.

      I hope they don't have the NSLU2 disadvantage of not powering on automatically after a power failure.

      This annoyance makes the NSLU2 unsuitable for remote monitoring where the electricity supply is unreliable.

      The NSLU2 software distributions are also crippled (stripped down versions of utilities that break things like CPAN). Hopefully this one is more standardized and less unique.

    9. Re:I've got one by Nursie · · Score: 1

      That is an irritation with the NSLU2, though there was an always-on hardmod.

      AFAICT with the sheevaplug, when it has power it's on. Even shutdown -hP from linux doesn't switch it off, just halt the OS. So yes, when the juice hits the board, it starts up.

      "The NSLU2 software distributions are also crippled (stripped down versions of utilities that break things like CPAN). Hopefully this one is more standardized and less unique."

      I take it you never tried Debian on the NSLU2 then? That worked fine and was completely standard. I never tried the the various uNSLUng, SlugOS, Openslug and other distros so I've no idea what they were like.

    10. Re:I've got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just thinking along those lines. I have an old Apple laptop with a dying HDD that is spending its last days acting as an occasional media server for movies and stuff downloaded off the internet. If only this wall-wart had an HDMI output, it would make a perfect drop-in replacement if combined with a biggish external HDD.

      Oh well, I guess one day it's bound to happen. I can wait.

      usb hub: check
      usb hdmi dongle: check
      usb hard drive: check

      i fail to see how you couldn't.

    11. Re:I've got one by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      I reflashed my nslu2 with debian. Memory is a little tight, but the specs are comparable to the typical 1997 era computer

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    12. Re:I've got one by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      look at libmad. It's an integer-only mp3 library.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    13. Re:I've got one by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Well debian currently has two arm ports, "arm" (old ABI) and "armel" (EABI). arm's last release was lenny, armel's first release was lenny.

      Debian decided a long time ago (for reasons I do not know but that probablly made sense at the time) to build debian arm for the traditional arm FPU. The trouble is few current chips have that FPU and the kernel emulation is extremely slow (due to the overhead of trapping the illegal instructions).

      Trouble was the old arm ABI didn't allow you to mix code compiled with different FPU options so it wasn't possible to simply switch compiler defaults to softfloat.

      EABI doesn't suffer from this problem and the debian arm porters have proposed building versions of important packages with optimisations for particular FPUs but afaict they have not actually modified any of thier source packages to do this yet.

      In other words right now you either use a custom built set of binaries for your hardware (that are likely to get abandoned as your hardware gets older) or you get poor (armel) or terrible (arm) floating point performance.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    14. Re:I've got one by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      That is an irritation with the NSLU2, though there was an always-on hardmod.
      You don't even techically have to mod the NSLU2, you can just make up a cable that will do when is required externally.

      http://www.nslu2-linux.org/wiki/HowTo/ForcePowerAlwaysOn#method8 (I would do the wiring slightly less hackishly but the principle of what needs to be connected is what matters).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    15. Re:I've got one by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      on't really see the revolution here - it's a small headless server. A bit like an NSLU2 only a lot faster
      Faster and a lot more ram. Also this device is being explicitly sold as a "devkit" which means you get console and JTAG access (via a USB to dual UART/FIFO chip) out of the box rather than having to hack them on.

      On the downside you only get one host-side USB port while the slug had two.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:I've got one by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      At full HD 60Hz 1920*1080*60*24=2985984000 bits per second. Even at the lower framerate used by movies we have 1920*1080*24*24=1194393600 bits per second.

      In other words USB is just too slow to carry decompressed full HD video.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:I've got one by I'm+just+joshin · · Score: 1

      I've had Gentoo running on my slugs for a couple years now. I build binary packages for them on my amd64 server. Works great. -J

    18. Re:I've got one by Nursie · · Score: 1

      True.

      Ideally, of course, the sheevaplug would have contained the variant with the FPU, as they do have some. Guess they cost more though.

    19. Re:I've got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't comment on SDHC but booting of an external USB hard drive works just fine. I had mines doing that for about a month now.

      instructions here

    20. Re:I've got one by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      A full HD (1080p) @ 60 fps is roughly 3 Gbps by your calculations, correct? Then why will it have any trouble with USB? I mean, the 3.0 standard sets speed at 5 Gbps...

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    21. Re:I've got one by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I mean, the 3.0 standard sets speed at 5 Gbps...
      When I said USB I meant USB 2.0 high speed which is what the sheevaplug has and what any USB to video adaptor you are likely to find easilly at the moment will use.

      Afaict 3.0 super speed is not on the general market yet and even when it is it remains to be seen how close to it's headline number it will get in practice

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:I've got one by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      <xml>I was being cheeky, <cheeky>Rush, put the meth surringe down for a sec and calm down, mmmkay?</cheeky></xml>

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    23. Re:I've got one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to know it has Ubuntu installed, the first step once mine shows up will be to wipe that shit off of there.

  3. Bad Case of Wall Warts? by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    What to Do With a $99 Wall Wart

    Wall warts are usually nothing to be concerned about unless they grow or spread rapidly. Usually you can just freeze 'em off--just be sure to get all the abnormal growth cells. It's a common wall growth caused by HPV (Hewlett Packard Virus).

    Linux Server

    Your warts are functioning as Linux servers? You may need to see a specialist ... and until you get that checked I would refrain from any prolonged exposure to GPL software.

    Count yourself lucky, it could be worse. My friend once had a case of $10,000 Server Room Herpes Microsoft Servers that kept him up all night ... not something you want on your resume.

    I applaud anyone who successfully markets this product ... the name is a bit of an obstacle. "Wall Hugger" or "Plug Pal" or even "Linux Lump" might have been more prudent for coining.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Bad Case of Wall Warts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But warts on terra can takes away ur freedomz.

    2. Re:Bad Case of Wall Warts? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...even "Linux Lump" might have been more prudent for coining.

      Yeah... then when you create your Beowulf cluster of these you can sing all about your lumps, your "lovely linux lumps".

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    3. Re:Bad Case of Wall Warts? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm afraid to look online to see if Plug Pal is already trademarked.

    4. Re:Bad Case of Wall Warts? by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      How about "Wall Pustule"? No?.. "Wall Scab"?.. I don't understand the problem..

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    5. Re:Bad Case of Wall Warts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is, but not in the way you might expect...

      http://www.plugpal.co.uk/

      (spoiler: it's really about wall sockets)

    6. Re:Bad Case of Wall Warts? by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      After seeing that I'd almost rather it had been, um, cruder. What a useless piece of crap.

  4. Wall wart, not WalMart by mbone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had to read this several times to realize that the OP wasn't talking about something being sold at WalMart. Maybe Michael Robertson should add this to the Linspire line.

    1. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're not the only one. Scary, isn't it, how a corporation's name can get that ingrained in one's head that anything similar immediately looks like it?

      I was thinking, "Well, that'll be kind of cool, if I can grab a $99 server computer at Wal-Mart."

    2. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scary, isn't it, how a corporation's name can get that ingrained in one's head that anything similar immediately looks like it?

      That's what I think every time I see a mention to GM food

    3. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's just brain pattern matching, it's not 'in grained' do to some corporate plan.

      And yes, I thought the exact same thing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by OldSoldier · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Rather than thinking it as WalMart market dominance that forces us to read "Wall Wart" as "Wall Mart"... I prefer to consider myself and all the others who mis-read the headline as being "up-down dyslexic".

      Seriously thought... 2 thoughts...
      a) a "fax" receiver. although last I checked I didn't think there was a phone line port for this. I do know that I really like my older generation Mac running OSX sitting on my phoneline getting all my faxes. Would love to have a smaller machine for this.
      b) the question is wrong... "what would you do with 'one' wall-wart" may be missing the point... may not be much you can do with one, but with lots???

    5. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

          Would that be Chevrolet corn, or Pontiac beef?

          I'd worry about the Oldsmobile green. It's made from old people.

         

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by corbettw · · Score: 1

      I just read "Chevrolet corn" as "Chevrolet.com", demonstrating that's it not just corporate trade marks that can cause confusion, but any term that resembles another.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    7. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by johannesg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Same here. I was already thinking that a computer the size of a Wallmart might be a bit too large for my house...

    8. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not the only one. Scary, isn't it, how a corporation's name can get that ingrained in one's head that anything similar immediately looks like it?

      /quote>

      Not being a native English speaker, I think this is the first time I ever heard the term "wall wart". The habit of capitalizing every word in a title (which we don't do in Dutch) made it look even more like a reference to the company. My first thought was that the writer of the summary must dislike Wall Mart very much.

    9. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      That's not scary, and it has nothing to do with "corporations." It's just how your brain reads: it looks at the shape of words and phrases, rather than the individaul lettres. If it finds a match to the shape, that's what you read--unless you are paying particulraly close attnetion.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    10. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      erm, "Imagine a beowulf cluster..."

      I'm surprised that no-one else has mentioned that yet.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    11. Re:Wall wart, not WalMart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, having worked in the food industry for a while, it's the opposite with me...when I see GM I immediately think "General Mills".

  5. Hackable devices everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We want this device to be in your TV, your stereo system, your DVD player.

    Why? Do you want to hack my TV, my stereo system and my DVD player?

    Putting complex computer devices into network enabled appliances is irresponsible. The makers of such time bombs should bear the full responsibility of intrusions through vulnerabilities found in their products.

    1. Re:Hackable devices everywhere by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you want to hack my TV, my stereo system and my DVD player?

      You're close. "They" want to preinstall spyware and otherwise bend the product to their own purposes.

      The smarter these devices get, the easier they can be used to subvert the interests of the consumer. And for some reason, we usually put up with it...

      The makers of such time bombs should bear the full responsibility of intrusions through vulnerabilities found in their products.

      They are counting on that. They know you'll just buy another one when your TV mysteriously slows down. You did with your computer, and those companies made a KILLING off of you. Why not the TV companies, too?

  6. One application I would go for by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have it run either skype or magicjack. I have heard that the second is planning to support Linux "soon". I would definitely be more interested in cheap phone service at home if it didn't require me to have a desktop computer on whenever I wanted to make a call.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or asterisk (www.asterisk.org) for a full PBX at home

    2. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ideal for Asterisk PBX. No question I'll test drive my ARM port of Asterisk on this thing.

    3. Re:One application I would go for by clarkn0va · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or freeswitch. Show me a dual-port version of said wart and I'll make it into a router.

      --
      I am literally 3000 tokens away from the chaotic crossbow --Stephen
    4. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a Fritz!box 7050. That is a router, WLAN access point, DSL-modem and Voip/ISDN/POTS-PBX in one device for less than $100. (It's been superseded by versions with integrated USB host port, but those are more than $100.)

    5. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      use pjsip and a standard voip provider.

    6. Re:One application I would go for by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Is that powerful enough for Asterisk? The O'Reilly "The future of telephony" says "Hobby system - No more than 5 channels - 400 MHz x86, 256 MB RAM". Ah, yes, indeed it is powerful enough. That said, how do you connect your phoneline to it? You do have to call in somewhere.

    7. Re:One application I would go for by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      My Asterisk system is SIP-only.

    8. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Skype has many ways to make calls without a PC including WiFi phones.

    9. Re:One application I would go for by Uberdog · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that cellphone calls interrupt a VOIP call, I'm rather happy with Skype on the iPhone for this.

    10. Re:One application I would go for by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Get a SIP phone (Cisco/Polycom on the high end, various lower-end phones, or even a Wifi phone). And yes, Asterisk works incredibly well on underpowered machines as long as it doesn't have to do lots of transcoding.

    11. Re:One application I would go for by Zerth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They got a slightly larger version, not plug form unfortunately, that brings out both GigE ports, an Esata connector, and 7 USB ports(although it looks like you could only use all of them with extension cables).

      200 bucks, though. Kinda pushes it.

      http://globalscaletechnologies.com/p-21-openrd-client.aspx

    12. Re:One application I would go for by hitmark · · Score: 1

      usb to ethernet?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    13. Re:One application I would go for by Locklin · · Score: 1

      It's called SIP.
      Google Lynksis spa2102

      Skype will always be tied to computers or expensive proprietary devices.

      --
      "Knowledge is the only instrument of production that is not subject to diminishing returns" -Journal of Political Econom
    14. Re:One application I would go for by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Depending on what kind of paranoia you are feeling today, how about either Tor (protect you privacy) or ZoneMinder (invade other people's privacy)?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could possibly use a USB to Ethernet converter. Presto!

    16. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get an ATA. Use some non-proprietary VOIP (SIP or something) protocol and you're set.

      Magicjacks have terrible sound quality.

    17. Re:One application I would go for by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      SWEET! That's on my list of things to buy, right after a house.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    18. Re:One application I would go for by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty new to Asterisk. I had to setup an Asterisk server at work interfacing with ISDN and as such using an ISDN card. How do you connect the Asterisk server to the normal telephone system without doing that? I mean, I still want to be able to call normal phones. The phones on my works network are Cisco SIP phones, that part I understand.

    19. Re:One application I would go for by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1
    20. Re:One application I would go for by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      You can either a) Use PSTN cards, which connect to the standard analog phone line in your house b) use ISDN as you did c) use a voice T1 or d) use SIP to a termination provider like Voicepulse (just an example, there are hundreds of SIP termination providers out there).

    21. Re:One application I would go for by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

      So, pretty much... What I did was correct. This solution (Wall-Wart Server) rules out both a) and b) (and probably c), but I wouldn't know). Leaves solution d), which means you don't have a "real" phone line anymore.

      I need my phone line anyway. No way to get DSL without a phoneline, so, I have ISDN, that's pretty common where I live and I have an HFC ISDN card supported by mISDN.... I could make a home-asterisk server. I don't see the point for now as I don't have yet teenaged daughters that call hours at a time ;-)

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
    22. Re:One application I would go for by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      One thing about the PSTN cards - make sure you have the right interface modules. They come in two flavors - FXO and FXS. FXO goes to the phone company, and FXS goes to any extensions you might have on the line. Bad things can happen when you get those mixed up, as the FXS interface puts power on the line for ringing any extensions attached to it. :-)

      I have a Digium TDM400 card on my Asterisk box at home, with one FXO and one FXS module. Previously I'd had it set up so that local calls went out via PSTN, and long distance went through my VoIP provider, but since then I've gone exclusively VoIP and the FXO interface sits idle. Being able to run regular (i.e. cheap) wireless phones on the FXS jack is quite handy, though.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    23. Re:One application I would go for by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd suggest keeping the FXO interface, and have your Asterisk routing table set to forward all 911 calls to it.

    24. Re:One application I would go for by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Hadn't thought about that - probably a good idea.

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    25. Re:One application I would go for by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      You don't even need the phone company to provide service to the line to get 911, so you could cancel said service if you'd like.

    26. Re:One application I would go for by NormalVisual · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know. I haven't had POTS service in years. :-)

      --
      Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
    27. Re:One application I would go for by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      You get cards specifically designed to interface VOIP systems to analog lines (IIRC they are called FXO cards). Looks like some winmodems can also be modified to do it ( http://www.voipuser.org/forum_topic_806.html ).

      There are also providers that let you access POTs over the internet (for a price ofc but those prices are often pretty competitive especially for international calls).

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    28. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already sell that sort of thing just google voip adapters the linksys pap2t or the grandstream ht486 are nice and bother under 50$

    29. Re:One application I would go for by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      That's a freaking steal. You realize that you could, with a little know-how, use that as a platform for your own personally-made netbook? You wouldn't even need to know that much in that many domains.

      Provided that's the same hardware (I didn't see any specs, board looked a bit bigger than what could fit in a wall plug), all you'd need would be:

      * Get one of those 7" USB LCDs for $130
      * take an older, thin steel case and bend the metal to make a case
      * get a couple misc. pieces from the hardware store, and/or salvage an old x86 laptop's hinge
      * use one of the various USB 'micro keyboards'
      * fashion a battery pack with some AA lion cells (I'd personally go for 'replaceable' and not a pack, so you could just pop them into a charger and swap in some fresh ones after a day or so)

      Preliminary "guess work" tells me that it'd be able to get roughly 5-6 hours on the same battery pack that the original Asus Eee used (based on the Eee 7" with the Celeron using 14.5 - 18 watts and the sheeva using 3-7 watts at full use, I'd guess the LCD might bring it up to 10 watts).

      BTW, there's the board + power adapter for $150 on the same site. That's closer to doable.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    30. Re:One application I would go for by Zerth · · Score: 1

      And both of them run off of 12 volts, so you could wire it to a freakin car battery if you wanted. I believe the plug version is 12 volts internally, as well, so it'd make a nice carputer.

      Alas, the $150 version has a single GigE port. I'd have loved it if it swapped the Esata for the second GigE.

      Although, with a Esata raid rack, that version could make a nice SAN base. If it works with this cheap 5-bay one, I'd buy it just to get the damn fan noise away from me.

    31. Re:One application I would go for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way I see it, SATA and two gigE ports are not mutually desirable, necessarily. I'd personally want either 2=3 network interfaces of some kind OR one network interface and 2 SATA interfaces.

      When I have the money, I will certainly be getting an enclosure like that with some disks and one of these SATA sheevaplugs. I need to replace the aging, hot, and noisy celeron system I've got doing that job now. Even with only 1 SATA port. It'll still knock the crap out of the $500+ 100-200MHz ARM or MIPS, 32Mb based "network storage" devices out there.

  7. First Easy-to-Use Dev Kit by digsbo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference with this thing is that it's got an easy to use dev kit based on a popular Linux distro, not some goofy one-off that doesn't have the packages you want (i.e. LAMP, media server, SAMBA, CUPS, etc.).

  8. Hack in some DisplayLink support by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you have yourself a nice little terminal.

  9. Wireless Version by notarockstar1979 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can they do a wireless version though? I have relatively few cables in my house and I'd like it to stay that way. I assume there are more people like me in the world considering how many WAPs there are in my area. It's a fantastic idea and I'm sure it's a fantastic device. I just wouldn't have one without wireless access.

    1. Re:Wireless Version by Nursie · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's got USB and an SD slot. You can get wireless devices that fit in either, so I should think it'll be ok.

    2. Re:Wireless Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the plug next to the plug the router is plugged into and stay wired? You already have one wire going from the wall socket to the router, one more will not kill you(1).

      1) I'm sure you could arrange some scenarios were it would.

    3. Re:Wireless Version by Daravon · · Score: 2, Informative

      It could easily kill you if you start chaining power strips together trying to set up a beowolf cluster of these. Chained power strips is a fire hazard.

      --
      I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    4. Re:Wireless Version by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Assuming reasonable power strips, why is it a fire hazard? It's all hook to the same breaker, so you can't pull more then 15Amps.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Wireless Version by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      I worked with a woman who had daisy chained 6 power strips together to make an "extension cord" to her desk (A network administrator at that) and one day we heard a really loud pop in her office. The next to the last strip in the chain went BOOM! Never daisy chain power strips.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    6. Re:Wireless Version by jeffb+(2.718) · · Score: 1

      That's probably because if you string together six power strips, you're six times as likely to have one bad power strip in the chain.

      I don't know if you can even buy power strips now that don't have built-in circuit breakers. If anything, chaining them together should make you SAFER, because if you should somehow come up with one breaker that fails to work, the others will back it up.

      This is not like chaining together lots of thin extension cords with three-way adapters, which remains a bad idea. The thin ones can't handle the standard 8/10/15/20A that would trip a central breaker, so you can start a fire that way.

    7. Re:Wireless Version by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Your WAP probably isn't wireless. Plug it into that.

    8. Re:Wireless Version by Daravon · · Score: 1

      That's true. With the new strips that have circuit breakers it might be a lot less likely for any of them to short out and cause a fire.

      Fire code, however, still frowns on the practice. Stringing together powerstrips, or powerstrips with extension cords are a good way to fail a fire inspection. I suppose they keep the law that way either due to lack of initiative to change it, or because there's no guarantee that the breakers will always function correctly (either due to a defect or poorly aging), leaving you in the same situation as having the old timey strips.

      --
      I traded all my mod points for these magic beans.
    9. Re:Wireless Version by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It went boom because it probably wasn't rated for the draw that was passing through it.

      In short,she overloaded it.

      Yes, I did use a pun. You've read, and now you can't unread.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  10. Sensors & Home Automation by Vytalon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking of using it for monitoring and control in a smart house type environment. I there are several company making USB sensor packages and relay controls. I found some with Linux support at phidgets.com. You could have a full set of sensor in key room and relays to control lighting or fans.

    --
    Let some one use your computer and they will use it for the day. Give or sell some one a computer and you will be tech s
    1. Re:Sensors & Home Automation by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      How well does CAT5 stand up to being run outside? I see you can get "outdoor" network cables, but do you really need them?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:Sensors & Home Automation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was thinking of using it for monitoring and control in a smart house type environment."

      1. you do not need a huge OS for control and data acquisition - more efficient and simple using an 8-bit micro with lots of I/O.

      2. Do not use this thing in a residential environment. By simple observation, it is not understood how this thing meets Class II construction requirements (ask your compliance engineer to explain). Ok for the dev lab, not good for the home.

    3. Re:Sensors & Home Automation by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 1

      UV light will kill cat5 cable pretty fast. Underground does as well but no were near as fast. Generally you can use the standard stuff but if your cable gets any water in it the copper rusts out pretty fast so be careful was baring the cable.

    4. Re:Sensors & Home Automation by vivtho · · Score: 1

      Copper rusts? I thought only iron does that? I think you mean corrodes. :)

  11. More RAM by spikedvodka · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If it had more RAM it'd make a great web-development server. With only 512MB Ram, I think some SQL databases might be a bit much.

    I'm thinking throw a USB external HDD, or maybe just a 8GB Flash-drive on it, and "let'er-Rip"

    maybe also add a second USB port, so you can add a USB WIFI adaptor, though the GigaBit ethernet sounds nice.

    I can also see using one as a low-end monitoring server (Nagios), or network print server.

    --
    I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    1. Re:More RAM by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, I suppose you'd want a SAN and a beefy server to put your DB on, then you can add an 8-way powerstrip of these things as nicely load-balanced web frontends, all connected over iSCSI to the SAN too!

      That's if you need the kind of power that a 512Mb device can't handle for you - remember that a lot of web servers fitted with 512MB were considered midrange not that long ago (and it is considerably more than most people get with their VPSs)

    2. Re:More RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eh, it could do a smaller site fairly well.
      It really depends on the site i guess.

      Or as you suggested (i think), small file-server.
      You could tape a little flash drive (or even use the SD slot for that, more costly though)
      Happy times, portable file server.
      Could even create a web interface to the files as well so your wi-fi enabled Whatever can access it if it can't any other ways.

    3. Re:More RAM by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      You routinely use databases that large during development for your web-projects? Phew... That's some heavy development stuff you do....

      I run a postrgesql server + apache + SQLLedger on a Duron 800MHz with 512Meg RAM. Works just fine. Sure the database isn't huge, but it's not a problem for what it does.

    4. Re:More RAM by suggsjc · · Score: 1

      8-way powerstrip of these things as nicely load-balanced web frontends

      That is a very interesting idea indeed...a grand total of $830 ($30 for the powerstrip). However, other than the novelty and space savings, how would the efficiency of these things compare to a pair of "tranditional" low powered/cheap web servers ($400 each) in terms of both $/throughput and $/watt?
      It would allow for easy/cheap capacity planning. $100 for an extra node in your webserver cluster...guess this would be a poor mans implementation of blade servers.

      --
      When I have a kid, I want to put him in one of those strollers for twins and then run around the mall looking frantic.
    5. Re:More RAM by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      Yes I do. It's kind of a pain sometimes. But when you're developing tools to effectively manage large DataBases, you need to be able to test it using a large Database to ensure efficient operation.

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    6. Re:More RAM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend of mine was using a network attached storage device with an ARM processor and 128MB of RAM as his personal web and mail server for a little while. He just used nginx and SQLite and it ran just fine.

    7. Re:More RAM by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

      Okay, makes sense... but do admit that you're working in a niche. Most webdevs could go with an underpowered server for their testing needs. I know that last when I did webdev (LAMP stack), it was in a VM running Debian Lenny and with 256Meg RAM the thing had plenty resources.

  12. The price is right, but... by Smidgin · · Score: 1

    When it hits that $40 pricetag, I can see it being worthwhile for a number of devices - with all the dongles around, the usb port certainly allows for that. But for the device to be truly versatile, they need more variations on the hardware. At 1 usb port, and 1 ethernet port, you're pretty limited with what you can do. Perhaps that's partly intention - you might buy more than one of them since you don't have enough usb ports to do all you'd like to do with it. Still, it would be so much more appealing if there were variations - throw in an esata port (assuming USB would be the bottleneck for NAS), or an extra ethernet port (router), or more USB ports, or built in wireless.

    When the price is that low, I think people would be willing to pay a little more to make it more customizable and get some more utility out of it.

    1. Re:The price is right, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With a 10$ USB hub you can add several extensions easily.
      It's just that VGA or sound could have been small and cheap and create more ways to use it (e.g. plug it into the TV. Or HIFI=> web radio or ambiance music over the network etc.).
      Of course Google tells me I can get sound output for 10$
      VGA is more like 50$. That makes it more expensive that an Intel Atom motherboard+mini ITX.

    2. Re:The price is right, but... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree that this device, at present, is a trifle too limited. USB expansion works; but it gets rather clunky if you want more than a few devices. On the plus side, the platform on which it is based offers a variety of more serious expansion options(2x SATA, 2xGbE, 1xUSB, 1xPCIe, and a bunch of serial and similar). It would be quite easy and, I suspect, quite likely for either Marvell or third parties to build slightly more expensive and substantially more functional versions of the device.

    3. Re:The price is right, but... by RawsonDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      quite likely for either Marvell or third parties to build slightly more expensive and substantially more functional versions of the device.

      Bingo. This product is simply their entry into the market. It IS quite likely that it will eventually be $40, but there will still be a $99 ******Plug, uncoincidentally containing a couple of the upgraded features dev's will want to utilize.

    4. Re:The price is right, but... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Not to mention USB video is going to have terrible performance.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  13. Looks like pogoplug... by chrisbtoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... are using one to host their website.

    --
    Registering accounts later than some other chrisb since 1997
  14. These things are largely useless by qoncept · · Score: 4, Informative

    "The first plausible use" for the thing is better served by a OpenWRT/dd-wrt router. As a web server, you might as well be using the computer you're on, or, if you're servering outsite your LAN, you should pay for real webhosting. I DO think it might be a good starting point for my networked home thermostat or even a full home automation system. But it's probably overkill.

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:These things are largely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The computer I'm on is not on all day and night. The plug will be.

    2. Re:These things are largely useless by qoncept · · Score: 1

      I bet your router will be too. And if it doesn't support OpenWRT, you can get one that does for a whole lot cheaper than this thing.

      --
      Whale
    3. Re:These things are largely useless by Nursie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, you can get a router with half a gig of internal storage, half a gig of RAM, a 1.2GHz chip and a USB port for less than 99 bucks?

      I call bullshit.

    4. Re:These things are largely useless by jacktherobot · · Score: 1

      "As a web server, you might as well be using the computer you're on, or, if you're servering outsite your LAN, you should pay for real webhosting.

      These days many people only have laptops, which aren't viable as a web server because you're constantly picking them up and taking them with you. If they bought one of these it could serve as a cheap permanent home computer, but it could be a link from their laptop to their home network.

    5. Re:These things are largely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather OpenBSD.

    6. Re:These things are largely useless by netruner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you're hitting your numbers in terms of price and power consumption, what's wrong with having more capability than you really need?

      --



      DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    7. Re:These things are largely useless by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I have a Asus WL-500W, and only get about 2MB/s HD access to the USB (tested with dd, and SMB access). My understanding is that this has to do with the fact that it lacks CPU power. Additionally, the extra RAM would be quite a boon for it too.

      Using one of these would leave me less RAM starved for rtorrent, I bet I would also see closer to the 8 - 16 mbit Usenet download I get off my desktop, instead of the consistent 3.6 I get on the router.

      When my NZB's are completed I bet this will be able to do the PAR2, and unrar far quicker too.

      This has 5x the CPU and 16x the RAM. It would make a much better platform and is tempting.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    8. Re:These things are largely useless by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The internal storage on this device is broken, actually. Do not use it.

    9. Re:These things are largely useless by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I know, it's got issues. Mine has stopped booting.

      Actually I wish I'd got its big brother - http://globalscaletechnologies.com/t-openrdcdetails.aspx

    10. Re:These things are largely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      AC writes: I'd rather OpenBSD.
      I've found it to be better for me personally, as well as others, to not be a sanctimonious, supercilious asshole. Give it a try!

    11. Re:These things are largely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. I started down the openwrt road and realized the time saved in not messing with a constrained platform was well worth the few extra bucks.

      I'm currently using one as my dns/dhcp (dnsmasq) in my house and have plans to host the host automation/network status pages, run openvpn, monitor the UPS and bigNG, VoIP CID listener, etc. It's perfect for all of that base infrastructure stuff in a small low power solid-state package.

      Given that it runs at ~5W I think 'excellent' is better word than 'overkill'

    12. Re:These things are largely useless by toddestan · · Score: 1

      If you don't care about using a full-blown computer, you can get a pretty nice used PC for less than $100.

    13. Re:These things are largely useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you can get a router with half a gig of internal storage, half a gig of RAM, a 1.2GHz chip and a USB port for less than 99 bucks?

      I call bullshit.

      can u put some link where u get such router for less than 99 bucks .. I am interested to buy one

    14. Re:These things are largely useless by Nursie · · Score: 1

      That's true, but you don't get the small/quiet/low power thing with an old PC. Though old laptops have some of that advantage.

      Me, I'm a geek and I like the idea of an ARM chip and the plug form factor.

    15. Re:These things are largely useless by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      "Largely useless" seems a bit much.

      Anything that requires always-on with a small power draw is a possibility on this. mostly it can be done on other devices too (often better), but this is still pretty attractive.

      One guy above mentioned using it as a Skype/VoIP box. Hook it up to the internet and use it's USB to attach a cordless USB telephone. Voila, a VoiP system that doesn't require a full-blown PC to be on all the time. At a potential $40, the whole solution would rival a budget model standard telephone from the high street.

      It's true you could use one of your existing always-on computers (like a server) or some other dedicated piece of kit and get the same or better results. But all things considered, it seems like it'd fit that role very happily.

  15. Combine with other technology and enjoy by meist3r · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hook up an external hard-drive or NAS and one of those USB displays http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS9676037801.html to create something like this: http://technewsline.net/displaylink-for-linux-turns-a-humble-wireless-router-into-a-beautiful-pc/. I'd build myself a nice BitTorrent client for which I don't have to leave my computer on all the time. Other than that I'd use those as fileservers and for routing/processing duties. Any bets on when the first Beowulf wall cluster will emerge?

    1. Re:Combine with other technology and enjoy by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Torrentflux-b4rt (with transmission underneath) runs adequately on an NSLU2. On the Sheevaplug it runs very nicely indeed, with plenty of resources left over for mediatomb and a whole load of other stuff. And all for a few watts.

    2. Re:Combine with other technology and enjoy by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Be warned though that USB tops out at about 40MB/sec, although you will probably find that the gigabit LAN can't get near that anyway.

      I used to use a 1.2GHz Via EPIA board as a NAS. Even with SATA drives and jumbo frames 20MB/sec was all it could manage (on a good day). These very cheap on-board NICs do not perform well for NAS.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Combine with other technology and enjoy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly agree.
      I ve been looking for a low power consuming Comp to run my torrent downloads.
      it sort of feels like an unneccasary waste of power keeping my Dual core up all night just to download .

  16. HomePlug? by Kryis · · Score: 1

    Can't they add HomePlug (ethernet over electrical wiring) functionality to it as well? It may not be as fast as gigabit ethernet, but it would mean that you don't have to have Cat5 run to it, or have it sitting directly next to a router / wifi access point.

    1. Re:HomePlug? by whyloginwhysubscribe · · Score: 1

      I like the idea, but guess it would slightly miss the point - although you would be adding a new set of niche users, you would be charging more for a feature that most of us would not use...

      Maybe they could completely miss the point, and add power over ethernet!

    2. Re:HomePlug? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Actually that's a good idea - they could make it a POE source. Though it's not much use with only one Ethernet port...

  17. FServe. Yep. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I could buy a couple of these and use 'em as FServe's for some of my... data.

  18. Could this save power? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Our current home network setup has my wife and I primarily using laptops. Our printer, however, is shared out by a desktop computer upstairs. The desktop computer also acts as a file server. (For example, keeping years' worth of photos that we wouldn't keep on the individual laptops.) While the monitor is shut off unless the desktop computer is actively being used (rarely), we would definitely save power by turning the desktop computer off. This would mean, however, that we would need to go upstairs and turn it on whenever we wanted to print or retrieve a file.

    I wonder how much energy these wall wart servers draw. If it's less than a standard desktop PC (which I build back in 2002), then it might be worth it to buy one, hook up a large USB HDD and the printer and share those out. Anyone know if this is possible (laptop & desktop computers currently run Windows XP)? If it is possible, any ideas how much power (if any) I would save?

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:Could this save power? by Nursie · · Score: 4, Informative

      Take a look at this page.

      Martin Michlmayr is a debian contributor/porter/activist/whatever with a keen interest in these sorts of devices, he published some early power use figures.

      But in short, yes, I think you'd save a lot of power. Though you'd have to buy an HDD caddy and take the power consumption of that into account. We're still likely talking about a lot less than a full PC.

      As for it being possible - Using samba, a linux box can appear to windows machines in much the same way a windows machine does - with exposed shared directories and shared printers. It's fairly simple, though I've not done the printer bit for some time.

    2. Re:Could this save power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It draws 19W --- http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/t-sheevaplugdetails.aspx#component

      You may prefer the Fit PC 2 --- http://www.fit-pc2.com/ --- which draws 10W and has more computational power (but doesn't have the form factor and is more expensive).

    3. Re:Could this save power? by jtev · · Score: 1

      I'd give you a very strong probably on that. You'd still need to have a USB Hub to attach more than one device to this particular plug computer. But with Samba and CUPS you could set it up to share files and printing to the windows machines. Then attach a hard drive and the printer, and all will be good.

      --
      That which is done from love exists beyond good and evil
    4. Re:Could this save power? by tweak13 · · Score: 1

      Unless you focused on buying power saving components or a particularly efficient power supply, it wouldn't be totally unreasonable to assume about 100W for a desktop PC at idle. This wall wart computer probably pulls down about 5W when idle. The specifications page for the product lists 19W as the capacity of the power supply and I'm sure it's rated for more than it will ever need. An external USB drive with a script that powers it down after it isn't used for a period of time probably isn't going to add much more, figure 10W for the wall wart server and drive just as a nice round number.

      Keeping them both on 24/7, the desktop will suck down 72 kWh per month, and the wall wart 7.2 kWh. Depending on your electric rates, that could be the difference between $100/yr for the desktop and $10/yr for the wall wart.

    5. Re:Could this save power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess it uses around 5-10W (Much bellow any desktop cumputer).
      Not counting your printer/HD, of course.

    6. Re:Could this save power? by maskedbishounen · · Score: 1

      Have you considered getting a cheap router (with USB ports) that will run OpenWRT/DD-WRT?

      --
      "An infinite number of monkeys typing into GNU emacs would never make a good program."
    7. Re:Could this save power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does your wife know about these "years' worth of photos that we wouldn't keep on the individual laptops"?

    8. Re:Could this save power? by pz · · Score: 1

      Our current home network setup has my wife and I primarily using laptops. Our printer, however, is shared out by a desktop computer upstairs. The desktop computer also acts as a file server. (For example, keeping years' worth of photos that we wouldn't keep on the individual laptops.) While the monitor is shut off unless the desktop computer is actively being used (rarely), we would definitely save power by turning the desktop computer off. This would mean, however, that we would need to go upstairs and turn it on whenever we wanted to print or retrieve a file.

      I wonder how much energy these wall wart servers draw. If it's less than a standard desktop PC (which I build back in 2002), then it might be worth it to buy one, hook up a large USB HDD and the printer and share those out. Anyone know if this is possible (laptop & desktop computers currently run Windows XP)? If it is possible, any ideas how much power (if any) I would save?

      In the New England region of the US, one desktop computer, left on 24 hours per day but idle most of the time, costs about $20 per month, in very rough figures. This is with the monitor powered down.

      I have no doubt that this varies by region, and it certainly varies with the class of hardware. If you're concerned about running costs, I would think seriously about undervolting / underclocking your server, ensuring that all disks spin down, and that it has a high-efficiency power supply. And, generally, more modern disks are more efficient per drive, and vastly more efficient per GB, especially for laptop-class disk drives.

      In fact, a laptop isn't a bad idea for this sort of server at all. I have one doing just about the same thing, consuming between 7W (idle) and 15W (active), with the display turned off.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    9. Re:Could this save power? by Dracolytch · · Score: 1

      Yes, it will likely save you a decent amount of power, even with an external HDD. That said, $100 (or even $40) is a lot of power. If you have a decent power management scheme turned on for your 2002 box, then you'll likely have difficulty justifying the cost and effort just on power savings alone. If you live in a smaller space, the space savings may also be worth a bit to you.

      That said, this is likely a good thing to keep in mind for future replacement/upgrade/expansion for many of us in a similar situation.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
    10. Re:Could this save power? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      No, I haven't. However, with Time Warner Cable chomping at the bit to institute ultra-low caps & overage fees, I've been thinking of replacing my current router (which otherwise works fine) with one that can generate reports on our bandwidth usage. If I do replace the router, one that can log/generate reports on bandwidth and has USB ports would be quite intriguing. Any suggestions?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    11. Re:Could this save power? by afidel · · Score: 1

      For $.10/KWhr power it's roughly $1/year/watt of idle power usage when you consider transmission charges.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    12. Re:Could this save power? by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2, Informative

      My old, underpowered (Celeron 800MHz) PC draws about 60 watts. My new(ish) QNap TS-109 NAS box draws something less than 20 and is a better file server... The new eeeBox desktop also draws less than 20.

    13. Re:Could this save power? by henni16 · · Score: 1

      You could also use a NAS device with an USB port/print server support.

      Or, depending on how you're connected to the Internet, get a (wireless) router with a printserver and a separate, simple NAS drive.

    14. Re:Could this save power? by spaceman375 · · Score: 1

      You can set your print serving pc to boot on network signal. Then just send it an ARP packet & pause while it boots before printing. If your power supply is old enuf you can plug the printer into the monitor power plug on it, and you're golden. You can also use an addressable power strip to control both. I use an old X10 home automation module for my printer.

      --
      On the one hand you take life too seriously, and on the other, you do not take playful existence seriously enough. Seth
    15. Re:Could this save power? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      You can set your print serving pc to boot on network signal. Then just send it an ARP packet & pause while it boots before printing. If your power supply is old enuf you can plug the printer into the monitor power plug on it, and you're golden.
      I don't think i've ever seen an ATX power supply that controlled power to the monitor. I've seen a few with a monitor power socket but it was just constantly powered.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    16. Re:Could this save power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If its power usage numbers you want. I have it right here:

      http://computingplugs.com/index.php/SheevaPlug_Performance#Power_usage

    17. Re:Could this save power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out Linksys' website, you can get wireless print servers so you can print to the printer from any computer on the wireless network. Plugs into the printer itself, so saves a good amount of power over using a computer.

    18. Re:Could this save power? by Eil · · Score: 1

      I've been researching hardware for this exact scenario. My goal has been to replace my current home file and web server (An Athlon 750 with 3 drives that consumes about 107 watts idle) with something smaller and a lot more power efficient.

      I'm currently looking into building a mini-tower system with an Intel Nano 330 dual-core CPU, mini-tower case, and two 1TB disks. (One primary storage disk and another to back up the first.) Rough estimates say that the total cost to build will be around $315 and I'm hoping to get between 15-20 watts idle (more if I can get the disks to spin down after a timeout).

      This plug computer looks interesting and I considered it as an alternative. But it turns out that the end price would be about the same ($100 for plug and about $100 for each external disk), the power savings wouldn't be all that great (a difference of 4 to 8 watts), and the disadvantages are significant (non-x86, usb disks only).

    19. Re:Could this save power? by really? · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at WOL? I have a backup server that is set to go into hibernation after one hour of idling. When I need to use it, I just send it a WOL packet and 45 secs to one minute later I can use it.

      --

      "Consistency is contrary to nature, contrary to life. The only completely consistent people are the dead." A. Huxley
    20. Re:Could this save power? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might also consider setting up a Wake-on-LAN setup - with little more than BIOS tweaking, it's often possible to get the computer to suspend to RAM at a very lower power usage state, and have it fire up when needed with only a small delay as you wait for the disk to spin up.

      Might be easier and cheaper than starting over.

  19. URL to purchase the wall wart by pfigura · · Score: 5, Informative

    The actual link where to buy the wallwart was pretty deep linked from Marvells website. This is apparently the official place to buy these things: http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/p-22-sheevaplug-dev-kit.aspx

  20. I wonder if USB monitors work with it by TinBromide · · Score: 4, Interesting

    you can get USB touch screens for (not cheap), but If you could tie a 7" USB touch screen to this device, you'd be able to create something that you can plug into almost any room and use for browsing, chat (rudimentary due to touch screen), and other very basic tasks.

    --
    Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    1. Re:I wonder if USB monitors work with it by Compholio · · Score: 1

      you can get USB touch screens ...

      Is the video done over USB or just the touch capability?

    2. Re:I wonder if USB monitors work with it by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      I believe there is an integrated USB video card in the monitor, so everything over one USB cable. Depending on the model you get, video, web cam, touch.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    3. Re:I wonder if USB monitors work with it by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      I don't know about these touch screens, but there are USB video adapters for full-size displays: http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NzI3NA

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    4. Re:I wonder if USB monitors work with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why bother, when you can just slap Xorg and OpenSSH on it and connect to it from another pc?

    5. Re:I wonder if USB monitors work with it by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      The point is not to have another computer where i want to connect to it from, its to have a computer in my kitchen, or the bathroom, or anywhere that there isn't a lot of counter space that can be always on without killing my electric bill.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  21. free food by thegreatemu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been trying to come up with a way to install a webcam somewhere in the department lounge so I can be the first to know when free food shows up...

    1. Re:free food by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      Granted d'link has had a solution waiting for you for the past few years with its wireless security camera line, using this would be cheaper by half (100+$20 webcam vs $350).

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    2. Re:free food by thegreatemu · · Score: 1

      using this would be cheaper by half.

      not to mention the extra geek cred that this solution gets you.

    3. Re:free food by Molochi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are a slew of little device servers that tend to be rather pricey that this device could replace. I think I paid $100 for a wireless printserver that only supports a single printer. I could run all 3 of mine off this gadget. And I could run my all in one off it, it wasn't supported by the printserver.

      --
      "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  22. Bla bla bla ... WHERE IS IT? by itsme1234 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Frankly I think there is some demand for such a thing; heck Amazon still sells the NSLU2 for close to $100 (and even more on some European local sites). However at this point this new gizmo is close to vaporware to me. Let's say I'm sold, where do I get it? The site referenced in the article is really not that helpful:

    - doesn't look like somebody I want to do business with (sorry)
    - Availability: Ships in 1 to 2 weeks
    - read the specs (WTF?):
            * Dimensions (L x W x D): 4" x 2.5" x 2"
            * Power requirements: 110V/220V
            * Drive connection: USB 2.0
            * Network connection: Gigabit Ethernet
            * Web browsers: Safari, FireFox, IE (v. 7 and above), Chrome, Opera
            * File access: Windows Explorer, Mac Finder
    - ships only to American Samoa, Canada, Guam, Puerto Rico, United States, US Virgin Islands

    1. Re:Bla bla bla ... WHERE IS IT? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      As mentioned further up http://www.globalscaletechnologies.com/p-22-sheevaplug-dev-kit.aspx

      I got mine from them, I'm in the UK.

      Though that's the original SheevaPlug dev kit, not the PogoPlug that TFA talks about. Same hardware, different software.

    2. Re:Bla bla bla ... WHERE IS IT? by crow · · Score: 1

      ships only to American Samoa, Canada, Guam, Puerto Rico, United States, US Virgin Islands

      So it ships only to United States, Canada, United States, United States, United States, United States.

    3. Re:Bla bla bla ... WHERE IS IT? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      ...and even then it seems to get confused.

      It doesn't seem to know how to ship to my rather mundane suburban (US) address.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Bla bla bla ... WHERE IS IT? by soapdog · · Score: 1

      I am on Brasil, South America in what americans would consider cute ocean place with no civilization and yet my sheevaplug arrived fine. It's running jaunty and had no problem with NAND whatsoever. So far it's a torrent download machine but I plan to build something better out of it. I am planning to buy more...

      --
      -- Por mais que eu ande no vale das trevas e da morte, meu PowerMac G4 Não Travará!!!
  23. they do make USB Hubs by kneemoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    are you serious? you're going to complain about the fact that its only got 1 USB port? Is this 1996 and we're still learning how USB works?

    --
    My Sig Sucks
    1. Re:they do make USB Hubs by FishWithAHammer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at that point you're starting to break out of the form factor.

      --
      "You can either have software quality or you can have pointer arithmetic, but you cannot have both at the same time."
    2. Re:they do make USB Hubs by afidel · · Score: 1

      Uh, any low speed device on a hub makes the entire thing slow down significantly so yeah, I am going to complain about 1 USB port. With 2 ethernet and wifi it would make a kick ass firewall appliance =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  24. Scanner server by Doug+Neal · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm planning to try making one of these into a scanner server. It could potentially turn any plain old USB scanner into a network-attached scanner, using the vast array of SANE drivers available.

    Initially it should be very easy just to run an instance of saned, which lets SANE frontends talk to the backend over a TCP socket. A more ambitious project would be to combine the SheevaPlug with a web-based SANE frontend... the only one I could find was phpSANE but it seems to be a dead project...

    1. Re:Scanner server by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That would be great. The cost on double sided, "output to pdf" scanners is comming down and I'd love to not have a "fat" computer attached to one just so I can scan my mail. Scanner + wall wart server on the entryway table, with a trash can right below it. Scan and trash. W00t.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    2. Re:Scanner server by afidel · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the shredder =)

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Scanner server by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Most people don't want to touch my mail after its been used as a cat box liner :) shredders tend to last a week past their warranties; my cat's bladder is always full it seems

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    4. Re:Scanner server by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Scanner + wall wart server on the entryway table, with a trash can right below it. Scan and trash.

      Any document worth scanning on the way in is worth shredding on the way out.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    5. Re:Scanner server by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      Just scan everything, if you need it search by date and rename it if it's that important.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  25. FLOPS? Distrbiuted computing application? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder, would it be able to run Folding@Home/Seti@Home/BOINC or do anything productive in its spare cycles?

  26. Logitech Duet by jackflap · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Install NFS/Samba or whatever, mount a network drive from a NAS to it and then install Logitech's SqueezeCentre software so that the Logitech Duet can play tracks from your NAS rather than a PC.

    1. Re:Logitech Duet by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately as far as I have been able to find SqeezeCenter is not just an install. It is a port.

      If I could run SqueezeCenter on one of these I'd be all over it.

  27. Hide it in the wall..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Put a solid-state flash drive on it, and wire it direct into the house wiring, and build it into a cavity in the wall. Store all your really secret stuff on it. Cops come calling and will never find it. If it dies, or after the cops are gone, a razor knife, cut through the sheetrock, and replace/destroy it. And for good measure, build it into the wall behind the fridge or other big appliance.

  28. So, the idea is... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    "We want this device to be in your TV, your stereo system, your DVD player.'"

    Kinda like this?

    It's not necessarily bad to be second. First-place sometimes gets the arrow in the chest. And you duck the incoming. But media server? In my DVD player? Well, maybe right after you make a remote that works, and we find a way past the CableCard fiasco. Until then, I welcome our alien Hulu-spewing overlords. That has promise.

    ps - Sorry for the PDF. I'm feeling retro this weekend.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  29. New? by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    We want this device to be in your TV, your stereo system, your DVD player.

    im in ur stereo, sharing ur tun3z!

    Seriously, what's the novelty here? This sort of thing has been available for a long time. Maybe not pre-packaged into a wall plug, but certainly small enough that they could have been. Is it just that this one is pre-made and relatively cheap?

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    1. Re:New? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I think that it is pretty much the "cheap" part that does it, followed by the "quite hacker friendly out of the box" part.

      Single board computers and small embedded boards generally, tend either to be very expensive for their spec(in the case of dev units and relatively low volume industrial hardened stuff, like most PC104 boards) or super cheap; but rather hostile to would-be modders(in the case of mass market consumer stuff, like most consoles and cell phones).

      This one has the convenience of mass market pricing, nontrivial specs, and explicit friendliness to development.

    2. Re:New? by egcagrac0 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, what's the novelty here? This sort of thing has been available for a long time. Maybe not pre-packaged into a wall plug, but certainly small enough that they could have been. Is it just that this one is pre-made and relatively cheap?

      It's prepackaged into a wall plug. It's cheap (most PC/104 stuff I've seen costs 3-4 times more). It doesn't look like a frankenboard with loose wires, and there's little chance that it will - it looks like a stylish white box that sits discreetly on the wall. Add an outline picture of some kind of fruit, and I doubt the casual observer would even question what it might be.

      This is cool because it's now easy for anyone (with teh skillz) to do some modest cool software stuff and end up with a very finished looking custom project.

  30. downloads + vpn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've wanted an ultra-low power solution for these two reasons (but mostly the first):

    1. Overnight downloads ( usually bittorrent ). There's no reason to leave my entire PC turned on, when all I really need is an internet connection and storage. Combine this with a high capacity SD card and power savings should be huge.

    2. VPN / remote desktop. While at work, I often find it useful to connect to my home machine for various reasons. It could be for a secure IM connection, or it could be just to have access to a different IP address for testing.

  31. Re:Automatic FRIST POST generator? by dominique_cimafranca · · Score: 1, Troll

    Maybe a "FIRST POST" comment should automatically be attached to every article?

  32. P2P by derGoldstein · · Score: 1

    Nobody saw this and think "external HD + bittorrent"? Just leave it on for as long as you like. I'm always looking for ways to offload background tasks to lower-power devices, and the best I can do for P2P right now is a laptop with a USB HD. It's low power, but if I didn't have a spare old laptop then the next-cheapest thing would be a netbook, which I'd probably want to use as, well, a netbook...

    --
    Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    1. Re:P2P by TeknoHog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm doing just that with a Buffalo Linkstation Live. It's sold as a network drive, but it is a complete ARM server running Linux, at least after you install a proper distro. At 400 MHz and 128 MB, it's not as powerful as this wall wart, but on the other hand it has a proper SATA drive.

      http://www.nas-central.org/index.php/Main_Page

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  33. Anyone else think low cost cluster? by Ouchie · · Score: 1

    With the price eventually heading down to around $60 you could build a nice beowulf cluster with a few switches and 100 wall warts. I am sure if you went direct to the manufacturer and orderd several hundred you could get the price down lower.

    --
    "Of all the things I've lost, I miss my mind the most." ~Ozzy Osborne
    1. Re:Anyone else think low cost cluster? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but no FPU.

    2. Re:Anyone else think low cost cluster? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      You could; but why would you?

      Clustering is, except in wildly unusual cases, something you do out of necessity, because your problem is too large to run on a single computer and you don't have enough money for one of the Real Serious Supercomputers. Looking at some benchmarks suggests that, for integer operations, this thing comes in about as fast as a 1GHz Athlon(it has no FPU, so don't even bother with floats). That is not at all bad for 5-10 watts; but it isn't even close to "fast" by the standards of problems that would require cluster computers. A single or dual socket 1U, loaded with dual or quad core processors, would absolutely murder something like this in terms of power. It would use substantially more energy; but its performance per watt might actually be fairly competitive, particularly once you consider the extra switiching capacity that would be needed for running many smaller computers, instead of fewer larger ones.

    3. Re:Anyone else think low cost cluster? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I spent about 5 years at video production shop that included 3D animation. They went from a few very powerful DEC ALPHA and SGI workstations to deploying a render farm on generic x86 and linux. Yes, the DEC ALPHA boxes kicked the living crap out of the x86 boxes one on one, but at $60k+ a pop, the DEC boxes were expensive. It could take 14 hours to render on the ALPHAs vs. say 20 hours on an x86 box. But for $60k you could be rendering 10 different frames on x86.. In 3D CGI rendering, you're better off to more physical CPU's producing X number of CPU cycles. Because you're always going to have down time due to hardware problems. You have 1 of 10 boxes go down, you're still running at 90%. If you have 1 of 1 go down and you're at 0%

      Now there does come a point where overhead costs start to factor in, such as building space, electricity, cooling, etc.. But we were able to make more deadlines with more x86 boxes rather than a few uber powerful boxes.

      I have a small cluster of 10 Mac Mini's I've picked up over the years off Ebay for cheap to play with Xgrid. I still do some Lightwave work on the side and fun. I could see where these would be perfect for a CGI hobbyist looking to render a little faster.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  34. Obligatory by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

    I can't wait till someone installs Linux on it, and creats a beowulf cluster!

  35. A secure personal network by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Interesting

    VPN'd to all your friends and family.

    Cruciall feature being trivial vpn config support.

     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:A secure personal network by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You might be better off using your router for that. A lot of them have VPN support now, although for maximum flexibility I would recommend running alternative firmware like Tomato or DD-WRT.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  36. Memcache by Stile+65 · · Score: 1

    This could be a space- and capital-efficient way to have many memcache servers. That was my first thought when I saw this.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  37. Re:Automatic FRIST POST generator? by wcb4 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    then people would race for "Second post"

    --
    I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
  38. Home Automation by finity · · Score: 1

    This is great! I'm building some home automation hardware and wanted something to serve up control software webpages. For a little over a year I've been putting all my computers into sleep when I leave to conserve power and I was dreading going back to the old mode of operation. I considered modding my WRT54G to have a USB port-serial port, then adding a webserver, but this seems like the perfect solution.

    Good timing!

  39. X-10 gone wild by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First accessory I'd want for a smart wall-wart would be powerline networking (that works, unlike X-10 that seems to be about 99% reliable, which is crap when it's open loop.) The next most obvious accessories include things like:
    • relay switching / dimming of the power line for lamp control, simple appliance control
    • An LED "night light" that could also convey information
    • A motion sensor
    • Microphone / speaker for intercom / VOIP functions
    • Temp sensors for room by room environmental data (and subsequent control of HVAC diverters / thermostat)
    • Battery power backup

    Problem is that most of these functions would be happy without their own local CPU, but if the CPUs do drop below the $50 price point, it could be feasible to just have local CPUs anyway for data integrity, local signal processing, autonomous operation in the event of network failure, etc.

    Did it strike anyone else as lame that the MIT dude said he'd have it run a spam filter?

    1. Re:X-10 gone wild by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      Why would a spam filter be lame? It's quite elegant compared to the canonical "old P3 in the closet" that people use.

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:X-10 gone wild by eap · · Score: 1

      The next most obvious accessories include things like:

      • relay switching / dimming of the power line for lamp control, simple appliance control
      • An LED "night light" that could also convey information
      • A motion sensor
      • Microphone / speaker for intercom / VOIP functions
      • Temp sensors for room by room environmental data (and subsequent control of HVAC diverters / thermostat)
      • Battery power backup

      You could accomplish temperature monitoring using 1-wire temp/humidity sensors connected to the USB bus with this interface.

    3. Re:X-10 gone wild by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      A spam filter worth having would require external (to the wart) storage, and I prefer larger organizations (Google, Yahoo, Corporate IT) to manage my spam filter for me, rather than trying to keep up with the battle myself ... kinda defeats the purpose of a spam filter if you have to think about it.

    4. Re:X-10 gone wild by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Most of these could be USB accessories (many are already available as such), but they could be cheaper still if they were wired to an IO pin on the chipset, and a slicker product if they were molded into the wart instead of dangling off on a connector.

    5. Re:X-10 gone wild by Eil · · Score: 1

      With the exception of the VoIP, all of these would be better handled by embedded microcontrollers and associated peripherals. There's a huge hacker community doing all of these things. Google Arduino, XBee, and XPort.

    6. Re:X-10 gone wild by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I'm just hoping I'll live to see the day when the controllers are cheap, reliable, readily available, and worth bothering with.

      Today you can buy a smart toaster, but it won't talk properly with your smart refrigerator or your PS3... It seems to have taken PCs about 30 years to reach some sort of convergence where you're not really "locked out" just because of the OS you run, or the hardware you run on... most software I care about today is available on the "big three" Win/Lin/Mac, and those three play relatively well with one another.

      I was probably stupid to buy a PS3, but I thought that I would want a BluRay player to go with the new TV, turns out it really isn't such a big deal, I would probably have been better off with a Mac Mini or similar little PC instead of the PS3... it still is pretty obtuse in the playing nicely with others department (DLNA is crap compared to the "Power of Samba / NFS").

      So, yeah, the embedded microcontrollers are around and they can do these things, but can they play nicely with the rest of the digital landscape yet? I don't really want to be rolling my own code to get the relevant data and functionality shared between these things - a full PC might seem like overkill, but it's going to be the quickest way to get something like a universal language between all the widgets, so that I can configure the night light to flash when then motion sensor outside the door is tripped, and more importantly, do unanticipated things like making the doorbell chime ring when outside temperature drops below 32 degrees or whatever...

      Convenience is the key - X-10 had a single vendor solution for lots of these kinds of things 10, maybe 15 years ago, including a central microcontroller, I had one, it was crap (periodic lockups, unreliable hardware, etc.), and I couldn't do much about it because their components wouldn't interact with other vendors' stuff, and the others didn't have as many choices in functionality, etc. etc.

  40. Europe by Bert64 · · Score: 2

    When will these devices become available in Europe?
    So far, i've only seen units designed for use in the US, which means they have a physically incompatible plug (and thus require a bulky adapter) and require 110V whereas european sockets provide 240V...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When will these devices become available in Europe?
      So far, i've only seen units designed for use in the US, which means they have a physically incompatible plug (and thus require a bulky adapter) and require 110V whereas european sockets provide 240V...

      Cut your adapter in half and then, just little bit more and it will be compatible to the US adapter!

    2. Re:Europe by swillden · · Score: 1

      So far, i've only seen units designed for use in the US, which means they have a physically incompatible plug (and thus require a bulky adapter) and require 110V whereas european sockets provide 240V...

      According to the feature list, it handles 100-240VAC/50-60Hz. So you may need a plug adapter, but the voltage isn't an issue.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    3. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The plug can be removed, then plug in a cord. It accepts 240V as well. Of course it wouldn't be a plug any more.

    4. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Power input: 100-240VAC/50-60Hz 19W
      rtfm !

    5. Re:Europe by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

      So far, i've only seen units designed for use in the US, which means they have a physically incompatible plug (and thus require a bulky adapter) and require 110V whereas european sockets provide 240V...

      According to the feature list, it handles 100-240VAC/50-60Hz. So you may need a plug adapter, but the voltage isn't an issue.

      Something like this, doesn't really add any significant cost, or bulk. Shipping to the UK was an extra $35 last time I looked.

    6. Re:Europe by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      12V support for cars would be nice too. GPS logging and sat nav anyone?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can remove the plug and plug in an '8' shaped AC cable. Powersupply supports 220/50hz

    8. Re:Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When will these devices become available in Europe?
      So far, i've only seen units designed for use in the US, which means they have a physically incompatible plug (and thus require a bulky adapter) and require 110V whereas european sockets provide 240V...

      SheevaPlug can use 110-240V 50/60hz.
      The plug is removable and you can plug in a cord easily. Has a figure of 8 type cord socket.

    9. Re:Europe by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Get one voltage/receptacle adapter, plug a spacious US-style power strip into it, and never be "arsed" by this problem again.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  41. Re:Automatic FRIST POST generator? by omeomi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why bother when you have a legion of idiots willing to do it for free?

  42. Anyone configured a print server yet ? by tmbailey123 · · Score: 1

    Got two development kits Wed. I setup samba shares off a usb drive with no problem. However it looks like cups might be overkill for this little server. Has anyone got a working solution for a print server ?

    thx

    -mike

    1. Re:Anyone configured a print server yet ? by afidel · · Score: 1

      P910nd is what DD-WRT uses for printer support. It's supported by Windows, CUPS, LPRng, and OSX. Basically it emulates an HP JetDirect.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  43. Skype maybe, MagicJack... faggedaboudit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MJ is the biggest crock of crap ever foisted on an unsuspecting public. I've been struggling with it for about a year- fortunately my subscription for it is about to end and I will let it die. The MJ firmware is unreliable. Their servers are unreliable. Don't count on replacing your phone line with MJ.

    Skype, on the other hand, just works. Video, which I use to call Japan regularly, is also great.

  44. well that's a simple answer by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    buy 9 more and cluster them. Then you can rent out processing time on your cluster.

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
    1. Re:well that's a simple answer by digitalsushi · · Score: 1

      That would be almost as fast as my Pentium 4 was!

      --
      slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
    2. Re:well that's a simple answer by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Properly coded, the cluster could do some tasks considerably faster. It would be nice if the power plugs were made in such a way to allow them to be stackable or at least fit more than three on a 8-plug power strip/small UPS.

    3. Re:well that's a simple answer by geekoid · · Score: 1

      hmm, or maybe I'll just create an in home cloud for my server.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:well that's a simple answer by dcherryholmes · · Score: 0

      The wall outlet plug snaps off, and they ship with a corded adapter. You could fit all 8 on a strip that way.

  45. Buy 2! Use one for parts! by IQ · · Score: 1

    Seriously,

    Take 2 - use the 2nd as a backup -

    --
    Adults are obsolete children. - Dr. Seuss
  46. media server by cornellfOo · · Score: 1

    Likely said before, but this would be perfect for a file backup/media server. Connect a USB drive, tie this little guy to a backup app like jungle disk and you have a remotely accessible file server that can be backed up offsite.

  47. compute farm by hey · · Score: 1

    Sorry if this was mentioned in the article...
    It would be nifty to get a bunch and hook them up as cheap compute farm.

  48. Anyone cracked the case on one of these? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the specs of this device I'd rather put it in my vehicle than my home. Has anyone opened one up to have a look at its internals? I imagine it wouldn't take too much tinkering to lop off the AC power supply and wire it to run off 12V DC. Add USB wifi and GPS dongles and this could be the platform for the vehicle tracking system I've been contemplating.

    1. Re:Anyone cracked the case on one of these? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I imagine it wouldn't take too much tinkering to lop off the AC power supply
      http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS2356496718.html gives us a picture, it seems the PSU is a seperate part (under a metal cover) connected via a 4 pin connector.

      The schematic ( http://www.plugcomputer.org/data/docs/sch/Sheeva-final%20Schematic.pdf page 5 ) tells us the connectors pinout, that it is a 5V, 3A supply, and that it's designator is J3.

      Unfortunatley the bill of materials ( http://www.plugcomputer.org/data/docs/sch/SHEEVA_V6.0_BOM.xls ) does not give us a part number but i'm pretty sure it's a type i've seen before and I could probablly find it in a parts catalog if I had the connector in front of me and the inclination to find it. Alternatively you could just cut the wires.

      and wire it to run off 12V DC.
      BTW if using electronics in a vehicle make sure you use a power supply designed for vehicle use. While vehicle power is nominally 12V it has a wide voltage range and is often very dirty.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  49. walmart sells refurbished computers as new! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    place this refurbished walmart system directly in the trash!! just because it comes from walmart doesn't mean your getting a deal. save your pennies. when times are tight, as they are now, shop around and build your own server with honest new brand-named components. walmart sells computers and electronics as new when they've actually been refurbished.

  50. Fan-less computer by Leolo · · Score: 1

    Combine with a USB "docking port" ( http://www.toshibadirect.com/td/b2c/adet.to?seg=HHO&poid=408593) and you get a computer with no moving parts. No moving parts = no noise, and less to break.

    1. Re:Fan-less computer by evol262 · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing anything about those running on Linux, much less Linux on ARM. Am I missing something?

      --
      "The more corrupt a society, the more numerous are its laws." -Tacticus
  51. Re:Automatic FRIST POST generator? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 0, Troll

    Stop feeding the trolls

    --
    Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
  52. Geek Parents Need this for a Baby Monitor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a geek dad with a 2.0 edition just over 2 months away, I can't help but think this is the missing link for an excellent baby monitor. Some good easy-to-use software feels like the "last mile" to a low-cost internet baby monitor. Laid out my wish list here: Internet Baby Monitor. Any other geek dads or mom's thinking the same thing? -BC

    1. Re:Geek Parents Need this for a Baby Monitor by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      Nope, not thinking that. A regular baby monitor is just fine.

      Why? I have three kids, and they have always been in the care of a trusted family member. Normally, either myself or my wife. Once in a while, an aunt, uncle, or grandparent.

      Bottom line: if you're putting your child(ren) - especially a baby - in the care of someone that you cannot trust to care for your child without a baby monitor, the solution to the problem isn't a baby monitor. The solution to the problem is making sure a trusted person is caring for your child. Normally, that should be you. Yes, that may mean having to adjust work schedules or having only one parent work, but it's a matter of priorities. If your children aren't your top priority, you need to reassess your priorities. And maybe get yourself snipped, while you're at it.

  53. Skype Server by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

    Found this article a while ago after having bought a Skype-to-phone adapter (This thing, I forget the exact model number). It basically describes a method of creating a "Skype server" that will provide skype service through the regular phone lines in your house.

    Having abandoned the adapter in question as being a bit pointless, I would be ASTOUNDED if the above solution actually worked reliably, but, hey, certainly looks like he put a lot of effort into creating it.

    --
    "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
  54. VERY BAD Support, NO linux development host by tvlinux · · Score: 1

    DO NOT BUY!!!
    I bought one. When I tried to download the development tool there were pages and file missing from the web page. Once I got it I found out that the host development platform was MSwindows only. I contacted Globalscale Technologies but they never answered my eamils. The hardware is nice but the software development system is horrible, support in non existent,
    DO NOT BUY!!!

    1. Re:VERY BAD Support, NO linux development host by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      Once I got it I found out that the host development platform was MSwindows only.

      To quote Dr. Emmett Brown, "You're just not thinking fourth dimensionally."

      It's an ARM processor. Take a surf on over to our friends at NetBSD.org, and see if it's one of the ARM processors they know about. If it is, then with possibly a certain amount of extra hackery to get the disk formatted, you're in business.

      If it isn't one of their identified processors, then fire off an email to them and tell them about it. They pride themselves on their system being able to run on every processor in the known universe, and so if you've got one that NetBSD doesn't run on, they're likely going to want to know about it.

      Also, seeing as it is known as an ARM processor, chances are good that even on the offchance that NetBSD doesn't support that exact one, because it does support a good number of ARM processors, they might well be able to lash together something that will run on that one with fairly minimal effort; they might even just have to change a couple of minor things here and there, and have a workable port for it.

      If you're someone who absolutely needs Linux, then there's not much I can say; although maybe the Linux portability people could possibly do something as well. Them I don't really know about.

    2. Re:VERY BAD Support, NO linux development host by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      The thing comes with linux already installed on it. He's talking about their devkit. Although the devkit is probably just a gcc cross-compiler, header files, and libraries, so I don't know what the problem is.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:VERY BAD Support, NO linux development host by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      The problem is the parent is a lazy ass visiual programmer.

  55. missing features by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    These are missing features which would make these well suited for wider geekdom adoption.

    Namely (in this order):
    * 2x Ethernet (only has one)
    * eSATA (only has CPU intensive USB 2.0)
    * WiFi (with a hostap capable chip)

    No, not all those features are necessary, and they're not all inclusively necessary, but they'd certainly push it a long way in any combination.

    One or the other would make these very appealing. As it stands, they're only a cursory attraction. Their cost outweighs any functionality.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  56. CLI media server, anyone? by petrus4 · · Score: 1

    So I've had the idea for a while now, of trying to find a console MP3 player. Even though I haven't ascended to LAN SSH jockey status yet, I have long been disgusted by the bloated abominations that are GNOME and KDE, (I'm a little less averse to KDE, truth be told, but it is even more bloated than GNOME) and thus have been looking for a better way.

    Yesterday I found this wonderful gem of a blog post, which told me about a lot of applications which I can use from the CLI, as well as a series of blog posts from this guy, which give you a lot more ideas in terms of applications and how to set them up.

    The end result is a realisation that just about any old junk you've got lying around, north of 400 Mhz, can be used for doing pretty much anything you want. Servers of all kinds, jukebox appliances, even incremental render/compiling nodes if you've got distcc or blender.

    Even people who've got 3Ghz+ machines should take a serious look at these CLI apps, IMHO. Cplay as a media player for example works great, and because it is only a front end rather than the app itself, as well as a media player, I can also plug something like mikmod into it to listen to my old mod files as well, which is awesome.

    Then of course there are the possibilities for a ram stick you can carry around in your pocket, as well. The command line is the single best thing about a UNIX system; if you don't use it, you're basically missing the entire point of it as a unique operating system. Ubuntu users and GUI junkies, take note! ;)

    1. Re:CLI media server, anyone? by value_added · · Score: 1

      Yesterday I found this [terminally...herent.com] wonderful gem of a blog post, which told me about a lot of applications which I can use from the CLI, as well as a series of blog posts from this [wordpress.com] guy, which give you a lot more ideas [wordpress.com] in terms of applications and how to set them up.

      I've always wondered why such apps aren't more popular than they are. When used (albeit as a mockup) in a movie or on television, the audience goes "Wow!". That same audience goes home and says "No way!".

      The argument, of course, is that it requires advanced knowledge, or that it's simply too hard. No matter that middle-aged secretaries had little trouble using or master disk formatting, file management or WordPerfect in the DOS days, or that the employees at the DMV or at Fry's counter are hardly compsci graduates.

      Congrats on your discoveries. Be sure to checkout Soekris boards for more fun.

    2. Re:CLI media server, anyone? by petrus4 · · Score: 1

      The argument, of course, is that it requires advanced knowledge, or that it's simply too hard.

      It's taken me about a week to get FreeBSD set up reasonably close to the way I want it, but that was mostly just because I was still learning. I've never really understood why people find anything other than Windows so difficult. Maybe I'm weird, but for me, FreeBSD has probably been the single easiest operating system I've ever used, as odd as that might sound.

      The single main reason why I like it is because even though sometimes it will take time to get things going initially, once something is set up to work the first time, it keeps working. It's not like Ubuntu where I had ALSA crashing whenever it felt like it. I can have Enlightenment, Claws-Mail, Firefox, the epic 5 IRC client, the cplay mp3 player, and htop running with screen though in under 100 Mb of RAM. Ubuntu uses 300 Mb of RAM, by contrast, with just GNOME running and no other applications.

      I don't understand why people find problem solving intimidating, either. I've never been intimidated by UNIX. (whether Linux or FreeBSD) I had some problems playing a DVD for the first time the other night, but I found that whenever I had a problem, I could usually just look for it on Google, or maybe go to the #FreeBSD irc channel, and someone else would have run into it and solved it themselves; so I was able to get past all of them. The Dark Knight was running very smoothly in xine, even while having Firefox and about six tabs going as well.

      If anything, I actually have found Windows genuinely scary because prior versions at least behaved in illogical. I don't like systems where the level of complexity is so high that if something crashes, it can be caused by the interaction of any two (or more) of a million different processes, and I can't hope to identify what they are, in order to fix the problem.

      I just hope there are enough of us CLI users left that these applications at least get maintained, going forward.

  57. WalMart URL for The $99 Product:: Request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't find it at Walmart. Would someone please post a link
    to the product.

    Thanks

    1. Re:WalMart URL for The $99 Product:: Request by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      RTFT (then re-read it more carefully, apparently a lot of americans misread it)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  58. It's more than that by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's slightly more significant than that. It's a 1GHz ARM board with 512Mb of RAM for $100. That's maybe a 5th what you'd find in a SBC format.

    Now, if only it had enough of the right kind of i/o ports to make hobbiest projects more appealing. 2x Ethernet and/or wifi would have been a good start.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    1. Re:It's more than that by digsbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True. Also, I'm sure there was a lot of debate for them to decide whether to add that stuff and push the price over $100. I would expect, if they get enough interest, they will offer such an item next year (1GB RAM, 2-3 USB, maybe wifi), and could do it for the same price.

    2. Re:It's more than that by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      But it's probablly also what makes it cheap, connectors are relatively expensive parts.

      Someone else mentioned above that they have a more expensive kit that has a lot more ports, a little too expensive for many hobby projects though IMO http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1242199&cid=28055837

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:It's more than that by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Unless they're adding a second USB hub/controller, adding 1-2 more USB is a trivial cost - mere cents for the added space the sockets would take.

      Wifi would maybe add $20-30 to the end cost, I'd imagine - maybe less. A second ethernet port would likely be $10 or so.

      Since the initial reports say $80 (or was it $60?) for a commercial, non-dev version sometime later in this year (and that wasn't just marketing hubub to garner more attention), those features seem like they could reasonably be put in the device at $100.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    4. Re:It's more than that by atraintocry · · Score: 1

      You'll be wanting a FON then :)

      I don't know about the clock speed or memory though. I'm assuming it's similar to a WRT54G. I think they have 32mb RAM now.

  59. Multifunctional device by Krneki · · Score: 1

    I'd like to see a device with connectors for: USB, Ethernet, Sata, VGA, DVI, 5.1 DD Audio, RJ12 (Telephone line), ...

    This way we can use it for everything: Router, Network storage, video recorder / playback, playing console for older games, web browser, VOIP server/client, ...

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Multifunctional device by duanes1967 · · Score: 1

      I second the Phone line.... I don't need a modem, but would like to decode caller-id and be able to GENERATE caller-id or similar low speed signaling over the phone line.

  60. If you don't know what you going to do with it.. by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

    Don't buy it!

  61. $250 with the case... by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    Looks to me like its $200 for the board only, you need to shell out another $50 if you want it in a nice case....

    Anyway, this is quite interesting, since probably within 10 years everyone will be able to have something like this running 24/7 and this will mean that all kind of darknets will become practical and everyday, making Big Content's attempts at preventing free distribution of its content much more difficult.

    1. Re:$250 with the case... by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Yilch, hadn't noticed that before. Not that I don't have a box lying around I could stuff it in, but I'd have been a bit disappointed.

      Slap this wireless mesh router on one of the ports(or integrate it), stick that combo in everyones house and have some really delightful darknets that only touch the public net for backhaul.

  62. Obligatory : Can You Raed Tihs by Nick+Driver · · Score: 1

    Everyone has already seen this a bazillion times, but still it's neat how the human brain recognizes words. Also more on this here.

  63. Use it as a firewall? by mozkill · · Score: 1

    I think it would be cool to put a SmoothWall linux distro on a Wall Wart to act as an impromptu firewall. Now, if they just made a version of the Wal Wart that had 2 NIC interfaces, then we would be in business!

    --

    -- Betting on the survival of the media industry is a serious risk. I advise investing elsewhere.
    1. Re:Use it as a firewall? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      They do. It's called the Open-RD Client.

      About $250 though.

  64. Re:Automatic FRIST POST generator? by Fotherington · · Score: 0

    Could be a task for Amazon's Mechanical Berk.

  65. PXE? by keith_nt4 · · Score: 1

    I must be the only one that thinks PXE booting should be a standard feature on all these kinds of little devices. Why use a big PC for such a task if it's so easy to use such a tiny device like this? Seems like it would be gaining popularity with all the CD-less netbooks floating around.

    --
    "UNIX is very simple, it just needs a genius to understand its simplicity." -Dennis Ritchie
    1. Re:PXE? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      As far as I know, PXE booting is theoretically supported beyond x86; but its actual existence leaves much to be desired.

      As for running the server side of the operation, this should do that without any trouble, just by following any "set up a PXE server on linux" guide.

    2. Re:PXE? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Afaict PXE is a standard for booting PC architecture machines over the network so not relevent here.

      This thing can boot a kernel over TFTP if you tell it to though (not sure if it can be set to do so automatically on every boot but I expect it can)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  66. Eh. by NineNine · · Score: 1

    Eh. I get perfectly functional Pentium machines from my local thrift stores. They're usually $20/apiece. I don't understand the point in buying new PC's for anything these days.

    1. Re:Eh. by jhfry · · Score: 1

      Good for you, you have a huge box that costs more to operate for a month than you spend buying it.

      These "wall wart" computers are handy for putting a computer in an inconspicous location... perhaps in an enclosure at the top of a light pole with a webcam for traffic monitoring. Or maybe they could be used in a production or shipping environment while connected to a barcode scanner and some servo control hardware.

      A $20 pc with full AT/ATX powersupply, mechanical hard drive, and an assortment of outdated IO is usually not as useful for the types of things that these are intended for.

      --
      Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
  67. PogoPlug ... ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    looks kewl but it's pink so it must be for gurlz

  68. Missing eSata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For me it is missing eSata.

    Then it would be a killer for me...

    USB for disks is kind of lame and slow...

    1. Re:Missing eSata by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Having followed a couple of links from the comments here I wish I'd got it's big brother. For only twice the money (still only 200 dollars) you can get the version with 7 USB ports, eSATA, sound, VGA and a variety of other outputs. Many of which are present on the plug but not connected to anything. shame.

  69. Tiny squid serrver for wifi mesh by veranikon · · Score: 1

    I'm playing with mesh node wifi routers, setting up a small mesh near where I live.

    Something like this would be awesome as an itty-bitty squid server, to cache users' commonly browsed web content within the mesh itself. The open question would be whether the cache itself should reside entirely on a RAM disk to keep down access times, or whether the flash disk is fast enough. I'm guessing the former.

  70. Price drop? by insnprsn · · Score: 1

    Well heck, if these things hit $40 I may just have to pick one up :)

  71. PogoPlug+Wifi+Webcam+LockerRoom by jhfry · · Score: 2, Insightful

    =profit!!

    --
    Sometimes the best solution is to stop wasting time looking for an easy solution.
    1. Re:PogoPlug+Wifi+Webcam+LockerRoom by gishzida · · Score: 1

      Until the Gladiator / Pro Wrestlers catch on... then you are in trouble.

  72. I've got one by sunking2 · · Score: 1

    Its a great little NAS, runs icecast, http, etc just fine. The one thing to keep in mind is that it does not have a math coproc, so anything needs to do floating point is dog slow. For example, I was looking to have it as a solution that would reencode all my mp3s realtime down to 128 or 64 for transmitting over the internet. I don't think this puppy can handle it.

  73. The real question is... by jason777 · · Score: 1

    Can it run windows?

  74. Re:Automatic FRIST POST generator? by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    Maybe a "FIRST POST" comment should automatically be attached to every article?

    then people would race for "Second post"

    Maybe a convincing-looking autogenerated fake "first post" should be added randomly to around 50% of articles. Thus making it unclear which is the "true" first post and reducing the appeal.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  75. Stay out, please. by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

    We want this device to be in your TV, your stereo system, your DVD player.'"

    Stay out.

    I don't want your DRM, behavior/preference capturing, profiling, or any other implementation of your nitwit schemes on my gear.

    You cannot just throw DLC at me, and expect that I don't know what you're really trying to do.

  76. Huge Niche Market!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like Linux can tap this market to become the prefered OS of corporate espionage, keylogging, etc., almost literally overnight!

  77. Trash it. They're refurbished anyway. by home_skillit09 · · Score: 1

    They are made from refurbished parts made to look like new. Plus the parts they used are bottom of the barrel, I wouldn't store any valuable data on one.

  78. Mail server and ssh? by Rastl · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to look at putting up my own mail server and ssh soon and maybe this will be the best option out there. I have an aging notebook but I worry the thing will go into hibernation and make the server useless.

    Discuss.

  79. Add UPS for Always-on VOIP phone by justin.foell · · Score: 1

    To me this seems best combined with a UPS. Power your Cable/DSL modem, router, switch, ATA, and this (all low-power devices). Install asterisk on it and you could have sustained phone and internet service (via laptop) during power outages.

  80. On second thought.... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1
    The Marvel guys really hit it on the head when they said these things should be inside everything else you buy... I'm thinking of:
    • Printers - should all be network attached, when is the last time you cared to lock out any user on your local network from accessing your printer? If so, this is smart enough to configure access controls on an http interface too.
    • Ditto scanners
    • Coffee makers... well, for a certain type of coffee drinker...
    • Cars, with WiFi:
      • As a "radio"
      • For a mobile copy of the service manual, that also records maintenance and diagnostic info
      • If you could trust Detroit to write secure, reliable software, the engine, transmission and ABS computers would be much cooler if they reported status via wireless http
    • Any appliance that has a user's manual that you actually need to read and maintenance requirements
    • The oven could record successful (and not so successful) temperature profiles and even take snapshots of how you arranged the baking trays.

    $40 in 2 years isn't the really wild part - $4 in 10 years is where it starts getting crazy.

  81. pogoplug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The pogoplug is pretty impressive -- I was ready to click "buy", but then after a few more minutes of research, found out that they broker all communication to your wallwart...

    This is a dealbreaker for me. While I realize this is their "magic sauce" that makes it super easy to access your pogoplug, any service that forces me to route my files through them is a no-go. (partly for security reasons, but mostly for being tied to a single vendor)

  82. MythTV backend? by SparkleMotion88 · · Score: 1
    It might be just powerful enough to run a mythtv backend. It would take some experimentation, but it might just work. Just combine the "wall wart" with:
    1. A NAS device or file server to store recordings
    2. A network tuner like the HD HomeRun

    There is something very pleasing and unix-like about this sort of setup. Instead of having a large, noisy computer that contains all sort of components do perform this task and many others, we have a few components that do one thing well, and we just connect those components together. I hope in the future we have more devices that allow this sort of "tinkering by combination."

  83. Re:SANE by colinnwn · · Score: 1

    Coming from someone trying to set up CUPS and SANE on my MythTV machine, trying to get SANE up and a scanner accessible on a remote computer is like stabbing yourself in the eye with a butter knife.

  84. Are you avoiding ... The Beowolf ? by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1

    Like .. Imagine a beowolf cluster of those plugs? .. ... There is no such thing as avoiding the beowolf!

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  85. DIY Nettop! by Ken_g6 · · Score: 1

    Wall Wart Linux Server - $99
    USB Hub - $15
    USB VGA video card - $50
    USB flash drive - $35

    Building your own nettop computer - priceless!

    --
    (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
  86. I've seen server rooms about WallMart size by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Back in the mid-90s, when the web server business hadn't quite been invented, and PCs were still about 4U size but not rack mounted, I did a consulting gig out at Novell, whose primary business in those days was Netware networking. Their test lab was maybe half a Walmart large, with Metro shelves with PCs on them, including keyboards and monitors. There were about 500 PCs, and the network was probably running on Thinwire, but might have been upgraded to 10baseT by then? They were able to segment off groups of 10-100 servers for smaller tests if they needed to, or patch the whole room together.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  87. NO JTAG OpenOCD config, bzip2 instead cpio, .... by tvlinux · · Score: 1

    If you look at the documentation( When I bought it the version was only 1.0), you will see everything is for MWsindow (Putty?). I tried every know ftdi configuration to get OpenOCD working(I even had to cat /proc/bus/usb to get the numbers, it was not published then), none worked. When I wrote them about it, No answer. If OpenOCD does not work, and you can not debug the system at that low level, You do not have full control, The Linux host that come with it is just a is a bzip2 of a gcc&libs and a file system (BTW: devices and sockets do not like to be zipped, use cpio). To me this is a MSwindoze programmer that does not know what they are doing. Setting up TFTP and NFS root is basic to any embedded Linux project, it is the low level debugger that makes the system.

  88. Tomato + USB by gobbo · · Score: 1

    A souped up router plus USB drive for minimal file/print serving saves tons of power (since the router's going to be running anyway).

    Tomato firmware provides excellent bandwidth reports (including a realtime graph and saving logs to a device), and even better, very useable Quality of Service controls plus fine grained control over many aspects of the device (including broadcast power). It is rock solid and easy to use. I find the GUI clearer than almost all stock consumer router software, yet vastly more capable.

    For a router with USB ports that can load Tomato, I suggest the Asus Premium models, or the linksys WRTSL54GS (f you can find one). You will need a special version of Tomato that supports USB.

    Check the wikipedia page for an overview, and for the USB + FTP + Samba mod see this thread on the Linksys community forum.

  89. Sonos on the cheap by il1019 · · Score: 0

    If you run linux, you could probably set it up as a pulseaudio sink. That way, you could stream music to speakers other than the ones at your desk. I always wanted to do that, sorta like what apple does on it's airport, but cheaper and linux based.

  90. Re:SANE by Doug+Neal · · Score: 1

    Yeah, the network stuff in SANE sucks, I was trying to get it working myself last week, without success.. this is in fact what gave me the idea for the web frontend. The SheevaPlug is just a really nifty device to host it on.

  91. And their associates..... by JamesonLewis3rd · · Score: 1

    .....are so knowledgeable, I have been known to experience several waves of vertigo induced by the hyper-concise answers to even the most complex questions delivered with extreme rapidity and a smile. Who am I talking about? Where have I fallen under the spell of superior intellect and customer relations to the point where they had to throw water in my face? Or.....

    --
    Hebrews 11:8
    Jeremiah 33:3