Slashdot Mirror


11-Year-Old Graduates With Degree In Astrophysics

Gotenosente writes "11-Year-Old Moshe Kai Cavalin has graduated from East Los Angeles Community College with a degree in astrophysics. 'At a time when his peers are finishing 6th grade, this only child of a Taiwanese mother and an Israeli father is trying on a cap and gown preparing to graduate with a 4.0 from community college.' The article continues with a quotation by the boy, hinting at his modesty, 'I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way.' Daniel Judge, Cavalin's statistics professor, says, 'Most students think that things should be harder than they are and they put these mental blocks in front of them and they make things harder than they should be. In the case of Moshe, he sees right through the complications.'"

648 comments

  1. Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative
    It is amazing to have done this by age 11 but it is a 2 year associates degree of liberal arts in astrophysics.

    Once again, I'm not trying to detract from his accomplishments but this isn't exactly as intensive as a four year bachelor's of science.

    I was looking for a course plan from that college but could not find one for astrophysics ... if you look up regular physics, it simply says "The item you selected does not have a Certificate/Degree." Please note their general catalogue has no mention of astrophysics. This is the extent of all of their Physics courses:
    • PHYSICS 001 Mechanics of Solids
    • PHYSICS 002 Mechanics of Fluids, Heat and Sound
    • PHYSICS 003 Electricity and Magnetism
    • PHYSICS 004 Optics and Modern Physics
    • PHYSICS 006 General Physics I
    • PHYSICS 007 General Physics II
    • PHYSICS 011 Introductory Physics
    • PHYSICS 021 General Physics I with Calculus
    • PHYSICS 022 General Physics II with Calculus

    Leaves a bit to be desired. Is it possible to "get" a degree in physics (let alone a special area of physics) with the most advanced course being "Optics and Modern Physics?" I think in my undergrad we touched on relativity in required physics courses with several advanced courses devoted entirely to it and its special forms.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by siloko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I could barely tie my shoe laces when I was 11 let alone come out with: "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way." That's a very special comment right there.

    2. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot to add Sensationalism 101.

    3. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by LogarithmicSpiral · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to TFA, he plans to get a 4 year degree after taking 6-12 months off, though he doesn't specify a major.

    4. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, give me a break! He's only 11 you jealous prick.

    5. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way." That's a very special comment right there.

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by siloko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Appreciating others' skills doesn't make it impossible to recognise your own . . .

    7. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by glueball · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How come there are no genius 11 year olds graduating with a Communications or Journalism degree? How about a Bus Ad or Political Sci degree?

    8. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TheCycoONE · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is it a shame? If he was raised to think he was very different from everyone else he might have feigned stupid to fit in. Regardless he'll probably discover in his teenage years that he lacks peers and seek to remedy the situation somehow. Actually with his current ambition to be an actor he may end up facing just as much difficulty as anyone else - and it's not a shame to waste a genius mind on acting. Everyone is entitled to attempt to succeed at their own dreams.

    9. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but he seems very smug... Hippy related comment. From an article on yahoo "I think video games are a waste of time, They do nothing to help the world"

      I paraphrase, as i am too lazy to look it up.

      I laugh at your 2 year associate's degree. a REAL man would've gotten his bachelor's, and in 3 years.

      Pussy.

    10. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      Some how I don't think he is done with his schooling. Yea I was going to make a joke about it just being a community college but thought better of it.
      So he has a two year degree at 11. I wonder if he will start adding a few more Associates degrees before he goes to a major university. By the time he is say 16 he could have several associates degrees in a variety of subjects. Actually that would probably be a better choice as long as he doesn't get board.
      He could actually end up a very well rounded person by the time he goes off to a major University.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    11. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DarrenBaker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism.

      Didn't your mother ever teach you to not use a $20 word where a $5 word will do? ;)

    12. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by nicolas.kassis · · Score: 5, Funny

      But why can't he be an evil genius? The world needs more evil geniuses so that we can get more super heroes.

    13. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by afabbro · · Score: 1

      According to TFA, he plans to get a 4 year degree after taking 6-12 months off, though he doesn't specify a major.

      That a boy...go to college on the six year plan just like real twentysomethings.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    14. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Odds are he'll kill himself by age 30, actually.

      Wait, he graduated from ELAC? ELAC?
      There aren't enough LOLs in the world for this one.

    15. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      Because if you're smart enough to get a degree at that age you want to get it in something real and useful? Of the ones you mentioned the only real degree is journalism.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    16. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by underqualified · · Score: 0

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism.

      james joyce? is that you?

    17. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Liberaltarian · · Score: 2, Funny

      I sure hope not. They'd have an unfair advantage in Business Administration, where the best that most can do is simply act like 11-year-olds.

      --
      The Fight for Student Power on Campus: www.forstudentpower.org.
    18. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Personally, I was designing databases when I was 7 years old with the knowledge I was able to cull out of a stack of Byte magazines. I don't think he's particularly unusual.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    19. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Dude, there is that physics with calculus. Calculus, you know, math stuff? Math is hard, bro.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    20. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

      Personally I think that the time off should be time off in a normal school with kids his age

    21. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Tetsujin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      ...an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism.

      Didn't your mother ever teach you to not use a $20 word where a $5 word will do? ;)

      How about...

      "really very silly phrase people only use to make dumb people feel okay."

      But then it doesn't sound like something The Penguin (of Batman fame) would say...

      Unless he were repeating himself... ...To Killer Croc.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    22. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by AttillaTheNun · · Score: 1

      That's just his back-handed way of saying the rest of us are drooling mouth-breathers, relatively speaking.

    23. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being smarter than the vast majority of the population does not mean you have, or ever will, accomplish anything. Better the kid learn humility and challenge himself than become the kind of person who whines about political correctness on the Internet.

    24. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      Never use a big word when a diminutive one will suffice.

    25. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by James+Skarzinskas · · Score: 3, Funny

      Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism.

      And so it is my very good honor to meet you -- and you may call me P.

    26. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by c_jonescc · · Score: 1

      Why do you think a BS is inherently better than a BA? There are plenty of very fancy bachelors programs in this country that award an arts degree for majoring in physics, and the physics department is generally part of the college of arts and sciences at universities, making it a liberal arts major.

      I went to a liberal arts school and have a BA, physics major. If you go to Harvard or Princeton and major in physics you get an AB.

      He did earn an AA, which as you point out is not as rigorous as a BA/BS, but it is still a degree that he has been awarded. I don't understand all the snootiness - when he's a 16 year old earning his bachelor's degree, will everyone here be consistent and complain that it's not like he finished his PhD already?

      --
      Getting diabetes AND salmonella would be a bad weekend.
    27. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by billcopc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A whole pile of degrees, and zero real-life experience.

      School ain't the be-all end-all of a person's career.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    28. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

      But why can't he be an evil genius? The world needs more evil geniuses so that we can get more super heroes.

      Wow, I never thought of super-villainy from the supply and demand curve viewpoint. If each superhero kills or incarcerates one super villain every month, each super hero is going to go through a dozen evil geniuses annually. And they can't all be super-duper evil geniuses, because any super-duper evil genius will recognize that mortality rate right quick and is likely to make a different career choice, such as stock trading.

      I think an associate's degree at age 11 is just about the right time for something horrible to happen that will corrupt him into turning evil. Perhaps there's a super-duper evil genius right now who is plotting to kidnap his mother to turn him into a revenge-motivated evildoer! Maybe the super-duper evil genius is seeking out dozens of these smart kids in advance, hoping to create enough evil geniuses to serve as cannon fodder for the future superheroes, and for them to serve as a distraction for when he puts his ultimate plan for world domination into motion.

      --
      John
    29. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by spotter · · Score: 1

      sounds pretty close to the first 2 years of physics at a regular college (2-3 semesters of general physics, depending on what they include, though generally 2), though where I went optics and modern physics were separate courses.

      modern physics was fun. optics was a bitch with the PDEs. No more wave equations for me.

    30. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, let's see.

      1 - The US has a population of 330 million, whereas China has 1.3 billion. You are *already* a minority, you dumb prick, and have been for a long time.

      2 - Taking and destroying, is that right ? So where the fuck do you go for a pack of smokes at 3am ? That's right, the Chinese convenience store, because they are the hardworking bastards who stay open 24/7, while you gripe about your subsidised crap job and the whole 40 houes you have to work.

      I don't care where my kids grow up, provided they are not within 1000 miles of you, you redneck douche.

    31. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Idiomatick · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes, sadly and I regret it all the time. When I was younger my regular vocabulary was probably double what it is now, all I did was read books. Since I've been dragged down to converse on the lcd level. It truly is a pity.

    32. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Hey, if a kid that smart tells me I'm just as smart as he is, who am I to argue?!

    33. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by vindimy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have attended ELAC and I could tell you that those courses are quite challenging and there's a LOT covered in each one of them. In addition, I believe that any physics-related majors are required to take ALL or MOST of the math courses available, which incidentally is the same requirements as for a Comp Sci Bachelors degree at UCLA. Maths include calculus 1-3, differential eqs, linear algebra, and discrete math. The 3rd physics (Optics and Waves) also includes a section on relativity, albeit not that big.
      ELAC is known as one of the campuses where instructors are more strict and standards are a bit higher. For an 11-yr-old kid to breeze through all these advanced maths and physics classes is truly a big accomplishment.

    34. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      Doing what, exactly? Should he essentially start at middle-school level work and do it all over again? Do you think that if he's back in school with the other kids, acing everything and bored out of his skull, that somehow he'll be able to fit in? I agree that he probably needs to learn better how to socialize with kids his own age, but taking him and his degree and tossing him back to middle school isn't going to do that. It would have been better if he'd never been advanced past his cohort, but it's far too late for that now.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    35. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by masmullin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. He is simply smart enough to know that no one will like him unless he is modest about his accomplishments.

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

    36. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      whoosh

    37. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Funny

      No. He is simply smart enough to know that no one will like him unless he is modest about his accomplishments.

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      This is so obvious that my brain hurt when the GP didn't realize it.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    38. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      ...an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism.

      Didn't your mother ever teach you to not use a $20 word where a $5 word will do? ;)

      Oh shush :). The only thing I'm pissed at about that comment is that he quit at triple alliteration. Underachieve much? ;) Here's an attempt at extending said comment:
      "... platitudinous pandering politic precept penguin."

      Aight, so 'penguin' is out of place but the rest stands :P.

    39. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by allcoolnameswheretak · · Score: 1

      I'm not trying to detract from his accomplishments either, but considering his apparent intelligence, the kid is not very consistent in his ideals; it's boring to play videogames because they are a waste of time and serve no purpose for humanity, but he wants to become an actor? Maybe I fail to see why movies serve humanity and videogames don't.

      I'm somewhat sceptical off this whole thing. Everything the kid talks about is so cliche... videogames are bad, wormholes are something smart to talk about, the political correctness of being humble and serving humanity... It all looks as if he is being told what to say.

    40. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by selven · · Score: 1

      That would be the real evil genius. Instead of doing bad stuff yourself, look for easily manipulable people and hire them to do your bidding, without doing anything yourself. It's sort of like the real criminal world.

    41. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by vigmeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually that would probably be a better choice as long as he doesn't get board.

      He's only 11 and you want him to starve through college like the rest of us?

      Cheers!

      --
      Atheist: Buddhist in a Prius
    42. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TheLink · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > he'll probably discover in his teenage years that he lacks peers

      He seems to be doing better with relating to girls than many slashdotters:

      http://www.daylife.com/photo/076m3k4g056Fe

      So maybe his social skills are OK.

      --
    43. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by cthulu_mt · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of the ones you mentioned the only real degree is journalism.

      You haven't read a newspaper lately have you?

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    44. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by gubers33 · · Score: 1

      It is true this is only associates degree. But this child is doing Calculus and advanced Physics at age 11. To give a little more perspective on this matter. Most kids his age are doing multiplication, division, ratios, decimals and some basic geometry. And most science is a low level life science. I mean this boy is taking classes that he would be normally be taking nearly ten years down the road. I mean I'm sure he isn't going to just stop learning after this year. Down be surprised when we hear about him a few years down the road when he graduates with BA or Masters from a respectable school. I mean he could have a Masters or a Doctorate before most people his age have an Associates or a Bachelor's Degree. This is a truely an amazing feat in any regard.

      --
      Just because you are wrong and I called you out on it doesn't mean I am a Troll.
    45. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by bcrowell · · Score: 4, Informative

      Is it possible to "get" a degree in physics (let alone a special area of physics) with the most advanced course being "Optics and Modern Physics?" I think in my undergrad we touched on relativity in required physics courses with several advanced courses devoted entirely to it and its special forms.

      I teach physics at a nearby community college (not ELAC). Community colleges in the US generally offer a bunch of different flavors of introductory physics. At my school, for instance, there are four different flavors of physics: Physics 130 (gen ed), 205-206 (algebra-based, for biology majors), 210-211 (calc-based, for biology majors), and 221-223 (calc-based, for physical science and engineering majors). I guarantee you ELAC's will match up almost exactly with these, because everything has to articulate properly with the Cal State and UC systems. You don't take more than one of these sequences. If he got an AA in physics at ELAC, presumably he had to take the highest-level physics sequence (probably the one they list as General Physics), plus 2 years of calculus. The physics sequence would include some of the more gee-whiz topics like relativity and quantum physics, but at a fairly basic level.

    46. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      Dennis Miller, is that you?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    47. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by corbettw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Unfortunately, the words that only cost $5 when our parents were young now cost $20. Inflation sucks.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    48. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Khashishi · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Or, maybe he realizes he's special, but is wise enough not to flaunt it.

    49. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by rhakka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      he's 11. He doesn't have to be told: he'll still do what he thinks is "right" without regard for other's viewpoints.

      When I was 11 I was spouting all kinds of things about smoking and drugs being bad and such. It was based on shallow understandings of things I had heard but didn't really get. It was also correct, but I hadn't yet been tested to disabuse myself of my illusions of perfection.

      He's 11. He'll learn. He's not old enough to really have an idea of what his life is going to be all about yet, he hasn't even hit puberty!! But he certainly has quite a head start. he's got 10+ more years than anyone else to explore adult-level topics of interest to his heart's content. Good stuff.

    50. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by thrawn_aj · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A whole pile of degrees, and zero real-life experience.

      School ain't the be-all end-all of a person's career.

      Here we go again with the "real world" paradigm. Would you rather he did pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories to tell at parties? Or get a few dozen year-long dead end jobs before settling into his permanent cubicle? Although, you are correct in one respect - he should learn as soon as possible that the real world has too many idiots in it (not referring to parent since I don't know his views on this matter) who will devalue any of his intellectual accomplishments unless it can be made into a Lifetime movie while deifying pseudo-celebrities whose only contribution to society is an entertaining way to dig themselves out of shit holes of their creation.

      Much better that he finds something he really likes, work really hard at it and build a career for himself. Just because most kids can't make up their minds until they are old farts who think they are still young doesn't mean that this budding genius should deliberately feign indecisiveness so that his peers feel good about themselves. (this last part was a response to several comments thrown around, NOT to parent).

    51. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 0, Troll

      Maybe the super-duper evil genius is seeking out dozens of these smart kids in advance, hoping to create enough evil geniuses to serve as cannon fodder ...

      Well, there is, actually. And he's well on his way to collecting his team of subordinate evil geniuses. Unfortunately, some don't make the team because of a high rate of IRS/tax-related difficulties that show up during the nomination process, so he's still got a bunch of empty slots to fill.

      ... and for them to serve as a distraction for when he puts his ultimate plan for world domination into motion.

      It's called "the stimulus package," and no comic book writer could possibly invent something more insidious, more full of plot twists, and more likely to produce spectacular unintended consequences.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    52. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by immcintosh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Didn't your mother ever teach you never to pass on an opportunity to alliterate?

    53. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      There's a discount rate for alliteration.

      rj

    54. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Appreciating others' skills doesn't make it impossible to recognise your own . . .

      But being unable to differentiate between varying levels of insight, discipline, practiced skills, quick-wittedness and such, or being unwilling to admit that you can tell the difference - that doesn't say much for the ol' critical thinking skills, or for how much one values honesty. Telling every under achieving glue sniffer that he's just as smart - in his own way, of course - as an 11 year old with a degree in astrophysics is... a big, fat, culturally corrisive lie. And telling the kid who could become a well polished beacon of reason once he matures a bit and learns to apply himself that, never mind, in his own way he's already just as smart as the kid in question? That's poisoning the well.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    55. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why can't he be an evil genius? The world needs more evil geniuses so that we can get more super heroes.

      And whoever modded this as insightful should have a long discussion with a little thingie called Reality.

    56. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      wise enough not to flaunt it

      He's not flaunting it (gee, other than getting press coverage about having a degree in astrophysics at the age of eleven!). But what he is doing is blowing a bunch of smoke of the asses of everyone who doesn't work that hard and apply themselves. "It's OK! You're all smart!"

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    57. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Eil · · Score: 1, Interesting

      but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      Don't confused learned mediocrity with modesty. We have a society (and a Slashdot comments section) literally full of people who think that they're better than everyone else, so it's encouraging to see an 11-year-old who knows better despite his intellectual gifts.

    58. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by uberdilligaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've run across some very bright kids who were surprisingly modest, to the point being self-deprecating. These kids know they're very bright, but they need to respond to the never ending stream of (invariably less bright) adults who are constantly telling them "Oh, you're so intelligent!"

      --
      Against stupidity, the Gods themselves contend in vain. --Friederich Schiller
    59. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call dibs on the hot broad in gray! Schwing!

    60. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      They'd probably say that he should have spent some more time studying spelling...

    61. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ChromeAeonium · · Score: 1

      I know you're trolling, but you've inadvertently touched a good point. Not a racial thing of course, but when was the last time we saw one of these stories about some genius kid who clawed their way out of a ghetto to get a college degree at that age? I haven't seen one. Its always that way. We see some story about this uber-genius kid, but when we dig deeper, it almost inevitably turns out that that they had (very) well off parents who pushed and encouraged them, and they got all the right help along the way. Surprise, that can has good results.
       
      I'm not trying to take away from anyone's accomplishments, I'm sure this kid is indeed exceptionally smart, but I really don't think his is cause to be impressed. When I see some kid rise up from some shit hole existence from a ghetto somewhere and get a degree at that age, I'll be impressed. But this, meh. Special, yes, but not fabulously so.

    62. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't your mother ever teach you never to pass on an opportunity to alliterate?

      My mother made me master multi-syllabic meta-mutterings merely to modify my meandering mental malapropisms and to manipulate my meager mix of mangled messages into a more magnificent maelstrom of mightily meaningful ... um ... stuff.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    63. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Besides, if you didn't have henchmen to send out one at a time, how could you possibly stall the super hero long enough for your story to last a full-length feature, much less a TV series?

    64. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you do now?

    65. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      They would say, "wow, maybe he should have taken an English class while he was at it."

    66. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think an associate's degree at age 11 is just about the right time for something horrible to happen that will corrupt him into turning evil.

      He will discover girls.

    67. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then I would have stepped up and said learn your grammar stupid head, it's You're, not 'Your all'

    68. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      "I don't know what the fuck you just said, Little Kid, but you're special, man. You reached out, and you touch a brother's heart."

    69. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GP (GGP to my post) would rather whine than actually think about anything. And that plays well on Slashdot so it gets modded up.

    70. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Mistlefoot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think he probably knows he's special. But he probably also wants to be a kid and enjoy life with his friends. He probably knows that some of them play sports quiet well and others are incredibly adept socially. He understands that we are all different.

      When I was going to high school my best friend at the time couldn't read or write very well - and as for math - he was terrified of it. At 17 he had already pulled his first complete engine and transmission apart and rebuilt them without a single book. He went on to build a business out of rebuilding transport truck transmissions and has about 30 employees under him. He specialized in this because, with his reading skills, he would never be able to become a licensed mechanic. In school, he was always teased as the 'stupid' guy because he, well, from a school standpoint, was.

      We've also all met people who are smart as hell but socially inept. Can't make friends and have no idea of what to talk about or how to keep a conversation going. And conversely, people who you like and feel like you are friends with 5 minutes after you meet them. You feel good every time you talk to them. They just make it work and you don't know how.

      Skill sets are varied. And he knows it. And for you to call him shallow because he appreciates that and is modest is - well, you said it best - Shallow.

    71. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Frigga's+Ring · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But why can't he be an evil genius?

      Because the job of "Evil Politician" pays as much and has very little in the way of intellectual requirements.

    72. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can tell you that I hated high school. I loved it when I was offered, and took the opportunity, to skip two years (I did one term in 9th grade, and finished the year in the 11th, going on into the 12th, somewhat akin to finishing your freshman year as a junior).

      I hated school. I loved the chance to finish it early.

      But once I got past all that, I realized that I'd lost a huge part of social development. To everyone in my former year level, I was 'the nerd who got promoted', and to the people in my new year level, I was 'that kid'.

      Sure, he's a smart kid, a very smart kid. But there is more to it than that.

      I was programming grading and other applications on my elementary school's Apple 2e when I was 10... there's just more to school than learning. And more options within school. Although, admittedly, you might need to look further afield than just the local options.

    73. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by bornyesterday · · Score: 2, Funny

      missives...the word you were looking for was missives

    74. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by edittard · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when did a little polite modesty equate to being brainwashed?

      --
      At the bottom of the /. main page it says 'Yesterday's News'. Well they got that right.
    75. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Math ain't hard, if your mind just gels with it. Took me forever to learn music (forgive the Good Will Hunting comparison), but I was doing algebra at age 8. Different people get different concepts.

    76. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Yes... it shows how low our education standards have fallen. :-)

    77. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      missives...the word you were looking for was missives

      omg u r 2 smart!!!

      Actually, that was the word I was looking for. You win!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    78. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd call him an idiot for mispronouncing ``you're'' as ``your''.

    79. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here we go again with the "real world" paradigm. Would you rather he did pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories to tell at parties? Or get a few dozen year-long dead end jobs before settling into his permanent cubicle? Although, you are correct in one respect - he should learn as soon as possible that the real world has too many idiots in it (not referring to parent since I don't know his views on this matter) who will devalue any of his intellectual accomplishments unless it can be made into a Lifetime movie while deifying pseudo-celebrities whose only contribution to society is an entertaining way to dig themselves out of shit holes of their creation.

      Much better that he finds something he really likes, work really hard at it and build a career for himself. Just because most kids can't make up their minds until they are old farts who think they are still young doesn't mean that this budding genius should deliberately feign indecisiveness so that his peers feel good about themselves. (this last part was a response to several comments thrown around, NOT to parent).

      I think the GP is right. I've know a couple of these kids who finish community college at 13. Most of them don't end up so well off. The kid is majoring in astrophysics, which is primarily a research field. As someone who works in a research field, my personal experience is that the kids that get good grades are not always the ones doing the best research. It's just an indication that they either have the basic mechanics down really well, or they are good at cheating on tests.

      Also, a big part of being successful in a research or office environment is relating to and communicating with your peers. Persistence/perseverance is also a useful skill that is hard to gauge from undergraduate academic records alone. In general, these skills are not acquired at 11 (or any age) without a little experience.

      I am not saying that the kid won't do amazing work in his lifetime. But just because mommy and daddy rammed him through school early (I know the article implies that they didn't... complete lies. ) and he could finish a few years at a community college that involved basic math doesn't mean that he will excel in a research field... especially if he is that weird guy who never washes his clothes and talks to himself all the time. A few parties probably wouldn't hurt him as there is a lot to be said for proper socialization. Of course, I know this is Slashdot, so that may not be of value here.

    80. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I have attended ELAC and I could tell you that those courses are quite challenging and there's a LOT covered in each one of them.

      Because, of course, if it were a circle jerk of bored out of their mind valley girls waiting til they can hit the mall, etc, et al, you'd be here clarifying that instead, right? You'd never miss a chance to undermine your educational choices if you thought they were in any way sub-par, right? ;)

    81. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      They'd probably remark on the irony of him having a degree at the age of eleven, and still not knowing the difference between "your" and "you're".

    82. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You forget that apparently most or all prisons or mental institutions in comic books are apparently built out of papier mache and bubble gum ... and they were all out of bubble gum. In the DC universe, as an example, breakouts are a weekly occurrence at Arkham Asylum. So the superhero's not going to go through a dozen evil geniuses annually, they'll go through the same evil genius every month for a year.

      Being a supervillain is actually not that bad a gig, depending on the superheroes who would be your opponents. For instance, if you're a member of one of Batman's, Superman's, or the Flash's rogues galleries, the worst that can happen to you from one of the superheroes is that they'll beat the crap out of you and leave you for the authorities. How many people have those superheroes actually killed, ever? Possibly loads and loads of chumps (aka red shirts) that nobody cares about, but how many supervillains have they killed? What's even better is that if your fight with them leads to your super-secret lair being destroyed, by their code of "honor" they're almost obligated to save you! Now Wonder Woman's rogues have a reason to be concerned ... although she had good reason for what happened between her and Maxwell Lord.

    83. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother made me master multi-syllabic meta-mutterings merely to modify my meandering mental malapropisms and to manipulate my meager mix of mangled messages into a more magnificent maelstrom of mightily meaningful ... um ... stuff.

      Motherfucker!

    84. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Funny

      He still won't be able to get a job, though. Once he graduates in 2011, he will see all the job listings requiring 12 years of experience with Microsoft Office 2010, and he will just give up to do drugs.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    85. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Art class.
      Music class.
      Gym.
      Recess.
      Possibly classes in English literature or history.

      I'm guessing if he went through college that fast, he probably didn't take that many humanities/elective classes. I agree that it would be a waste for him to take 6th grade science or math classes (maybe help TEACH them, but that's beside the point) but I think he could beef up his social and "soft" skills by being with people his own age.

    86. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Machtyn · · Score: 1
      Yes, while he shows intelligence and a bit of wisdom, this comment also shows his immaturity and lack of experience (which can only be gained with time, time with which he has.)

      But, graduating college at 11 may not be his highest goal in life.

      "I want to be a movie actor and compete in the 2016 Olympics in martial arts," Cavalin told NBC affliate Wood TV. FoxNews

    87. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      You don't need nearly that many unique supervillians because the ones previously put into custody escape all the time. How many times has The Joker gotten out of Arkham? What the comic universe really needs more of in order to lower the crime rate are some superpowered wardens.

    88. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      And for you to call him shallow because he appreciates that and is modest is - well, you said it best - Shallow

      What I'm really complaining about is that, despite his obvious high wattage, his teachers (and parents, obviously) have trained him to spout the "everyone is equally special" mantra, and that he - understandibly - doesn't have the backbone or urge to be as insightful and frank about his social observations as he is about astrophysics. You want modesty? What he should be doing is preaching hard work as the path to achievement, not blowing smoke about how inately smart everyone is, just like him, because that's what the adults in his life have given him to say.

      True modesty would be shown in his ability to inspire lack-of-blowhardedness in other people. Instead, he's telling everyone that they're all as smart as an 11 year old astrophysicist. It's a false dichotomy to suggest that he has to either push fake self esteem for everyone else to savor, or be an arrogant ass. It's possible to be appropriately humble and to remind people that they don't all get a gold star for breathing.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    89. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I see what you're saying there. On the one hand, this is far above and beyond what most kids have done by that age. That's definitely something to be praised and recognized. At the same time, I've taken the top level networking and programming classes at one of the local community colleges. The stuff being taught in those classes is no more difficult than what myself and friends (both friends at the time current friends I didn't have then) were doing with networking and programming by the time we were 12-14 (so a couple years older than this kid, to be fair, in the early to mid 90s) with all of us being completely self taught. I have to assume community college physics classes are pretty similar difficulty.

    90. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zeig Hail to the grammar Nazi!

    91. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't your mother ever teach you never to pass on an opportunity to alliterate?

      My mother made me master multi-syllabic meta-mutterings merely to modify my meandering mental malapropisms and to manipulate my meager mix of mangled messages into a more magnificent maelstrom of mightily meaningful ... um ... stuff.

      :)

    92. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My mother made me master multi-syllabic meta-mutterings merely to modify my meandering mental malapropisms and to manipulate my meager mix of mangled messages into a more magnificent maelstrom of mightily meaningful ... um ... stuff.

      mmmmmmmm.... beer.

    93. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather he did pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories...?

      Drunken-stoner genius stories!! Hell yeah!

      ----

      Much better that he...work really hard...

      Pfft! Work?!

    94. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      I'm so sorry he's been taught how to play well with others. What a shame. He could have made an amazing idiot savant. Now the poor kid will have to be a well rounded person.

    95. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      That it's a good thing he's working on astrophysics instead of english? s/Your/You're

    96. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by m.ducharme · · Score: 1

      That list should fill up about two years, at this kid's pace. Then what? I agree that it would be great for him to improve his soft skills, but he's already so far distinguishable from his cohort that no matter what he does, he's not going to fit in within a grade school/high school context.

      As for teaching, that would be a disaster. When I was in grade 7, my English teacher asked me to teach ONE lesson. I was set back socially with my peers for the rest of the year, and never fully recovered until high school. Late high school.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    97. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Would you rather he did pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories to tell at parties? Or get a few dozen year-long dead end jobs before settling into his permanent cubicle?
      Much better that he finds something he really likes, work really hard at it and build a career for himself.

      You act like those things are mutually exclusive. After 40 years in the professional workforce, I can say they are not.

      Oh, and you've been watching too many government-funded anti-pot campaigns. A person does not "Do Pot". They smoke it. Or eat it. But they don't "do" pot, just like when someone goes drinking they don't "Do Alcohol", and in the morning when you get up with a headache you don't "Do Aspirin".

    98. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah! No one even signed his cast!

    99. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Tikkun · · Score: 1

      Is your name 'M'? If so, were you imprisoned in cell number 1000?

    100. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by GammaKitsune · · Score: 1

      I kind of like "maledictions", myself.

      --
      Gamertag: WyleType
    101. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way." That's a very special comment right there.

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      you my friend, are a goof. I find it amazing that there are people out there who actually criticize the kid for being humble.
      Thankfully you are not on his level or you would be telling us how intelligent you are. now back to your thesaurus so you can pretend you actaully use the words in your comment.

      wanker

    102. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by omnichad · · Score: 1

      a.k.a. - blogger.com + AP/Reuters

    103. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Vu1turEMaN · · Score: 1

      Eh....very non-legit stuff going on there

      At my local community college (CCAC), we just had a 13 and a 88yr old graduate. The president of the Pittsburgh Penguins was the keynote speaker, and he got on stage and cried for two minutes about how CCAC changed his life and was better than his 4 years at Harvard.

      Community College is where its at...

    104. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Get this, I went to a liberal arts school and got a BS in digital media. Yeah, I went to a right-brained school, and got a left-brained degree in a right-brained subject.

      But physics is like art a lot of times. Some of the wackier ideas related to string theory that I've heard are much more art than science.

    105. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if the reason he went to a CC is because a 4 year school would not accept him? I have a gifted child (not that gifted though) and instead of skipping ahead, he gets a lot of enrichment both in and out of school. I'd rather he had a lot of time with peers, work in the community, time for things like band and sports and the like, so that when he does go to college, he has not only the educational background, but the social background, too. In ensuring this, I hope for him to have a better shot of getting into the college of his choice, first time around, doing what he loves. (Which, at ten, does seem engineering-based.)

      I think a reasonable college would turn away a child, suggesting to the parents that they find some way to let the kid be kid. And it isn't that CCs are easy -- mine was harder, in some subjects, than my 4 year college (and the grading system was harsher than a 4 year college or university as well -- (85 a B-? Cruel!) but I do know that at least the public ones might be required to take anyone who can meet the entrance requirements, and that could have been the situation.

      Still, no denying he is a brilliant child.

    106. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

      What kind of genius would enjoy those fields?

    107. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      To everyone in my former year level, I was 'the nerd who got promoted', and to the people in my new year level, I was 'that kid'.

      Is that what you think you missed out on? The social skills I learned in high school were absolutely worthless beyond high school. The absurd notions of popularity and "fitting in" that exist in high school social environments amount to nothing in terms of success beyond it. The social skills that I learned in my final year of college and beyond have been far more conducive to achieving a fulfilling life. I recommend to any parents with smart kids, get them the hell out of high school so that they can move on with their lives.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    108. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      If he thought he never better than everybody else. Just like every other 11year old does, he wouldn't have been able to absorb that much knowledge from his teachers in such a short time.

      Being curious and humble makes learning faster, also makes leaps outside of common knowledge harder, but you don't need those until later.

    109. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with true humility. Recognizing that each is smart in their own way leaves room for recognizing that you yourself are also smart in your own way.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    110. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with community college. However, I think there's something severely deceitful about having an associates degree of liberal arts in a hard science.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    111. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Why?

    112. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      you want him to starve through college like the rest of us?

      I always thought that was an intentional trial for you to qualify for a degree.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    113. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will offer you another viewpoint: As a 11 year old college graduate, you would probably use every opportunity to stress that you're not some brain freak. He probably hear all the time about how remarkable he is, while he strives for belonging and likeness. Pulling himself down from a intellectual high horse in a socially desirable way would then be a good strategy. Maybe even remarkable for someone who's eleven :)

      And not a sign of being brainwashed.

    114. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Sage+Gaspar · · Score: 1

      I was a bright kid and it went from soaking it in and being an attention magnet when I was a little kid to getting bored with all the praise sometimes around middle school. Do you find it interesting to sit around talking about how awesome you did on a test? Downplaying everything becomes instinctual to deflect the shitstream of mostly unwarranted praise that adults lavish upon kids with a little aptitude. At some point it starts to seem disingenuous even and the kid writes it off entirely as empty.

      I know someone who was a high schooler doing PhD level research mathematics, won lots of awards and scholarships, etc. We all knew he was amazing, he knew we knew, but he enjoyed just hanging out with the rest of us college kids so we didn't harp on it too much. He was incredibly confident and secure in himself, really enjoyed the math he was doing, but just didn't get off on asserting it. When we actually praised him for his work he knew that it was because his work was good and we honestly appreciated it on a mathematical level, not just that he was a Doogie Howser curio.

    115. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      There's nothing wrong with true humility.

      Right. But there is something wrong in telling an average kid that he's just as smart as an eleven year old astrophysicist. Where's the incentive to learn the same discpline and hard work that the kid scientist has already exhibited? Where's the humility in falsely (and, inevitably, temporarily) inflating the self esteem of kids that haven't shown the same drive, but are now getting the same praise?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    116. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      I'm fairly confident they'd say

      It's "You're", dipshit!

    117. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. If you think that's an intelligent comment then I can believe you could be slow enough not to be able to tie your own she laces at 11.

      That's an absurd patronising platitude that kids hear throughout their school careers starting from primary school so that nobody feels bad about being a daft. Actually most people are incredibly similar to one another with no remarkable qualities. The average person also isn't very clever. I know that won't be a very popular comment but the popularity of such incredibly idiotic programmes like "Big Brother" or "America's Next Top Model" quite thoroughly proves that.

      This kid is absolutely not a genius. I very much doubt he's of more than average intelligence. People always tend to underestimate kids. They really can't seem to remember what it was like to be their ages. Most kids are quite capable of learning at a faster rate than the standard school system but that school system has to be slowed down so that it can be applied to the masses and to large classrooms. Having to deal with large classes significantly slows down learning. Far more than would be the case with individual tuition. The average 11 year would be capable of finishing degrees, especially at a community college but most people are held back by the structure of the school system. The only difference in this case is that this kid had very pushy, probably attention seeking parents who wanted to push the kid harder, and worked hard to find loopholes to allow him to skip the standard curriculum all just so they could brag that their kid was so very "special". The jokes on the parents though because this kind is most certainly not even remotely special.

    118. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      There is a corollary to that, it's true. In college (which I started a week before my 16th), there was zero stigma to my age. Everyone was new, on a level footing, I mean, I never 'fit in', per se... I had my group of friends, and would wholeheartedly agree that ye gods, were there some wastes of space at high school... but there is some formative processes that happen there (including learning that a lot of it is not important in the vast scheme of things) that lay a groundwork for more sophisticated social development later.

    119. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Except he's right. Genius isn't some magical thing you are born with and cannot possess otherwise. Mozart was once thought to possess some unusual, mysterious, indescribable 'talent' but that's been largely shown to be false.

      When Bobby Fischer became a grandmaster at the age of 15, everyone thought he had this 'genius' or 'talent'. Then Laszlo Polgar showed that anyone could do it (his motto: "geniuses are made, not born"). He then provided evidence by teaching his own daughters to be grandmasters, one of them beating Bobby Fischer's record in 1991. Since then, the world has realized it's possible, and 15 more people since then have done the same.

      Besides, it's not like school is that hard. I have a friend who teaches math and English to adults who haven't learned how to subtract, and he gets them up to high school graduate level in 8 weeks. Seriously, don't you think you could have gotten through school so much faster if it had been arranged for you to do so? I'm pretty sure you could have.

      --
      Qxe4
    120. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by timeOday · · Score: 1

      What he should be doing is preaching hard work as the path to achievement, not blowing smoke about how inately smart everyone is, just like him

      You'd probably feel a lot better if you'd simply read the article. He already rebutted everything you said before you even said it:

      "Cavalin has a general idea what his IQ is, but doesn't like to discuss it. He says other students can achieve his success if they study hard and stay focused on their work.

      His parents say they never planned to enroll their son in college at age 8, and sought to put him in a private elementary school when he was 6.

      "They didn't want to accept me because I knew more than the teacher there and they said I looked too bored," the youngster recalls.

      So, calm down. This kid does know he is smart, and he does encourage others to work hard. And if you're that concerned about gap between haves and have-nots disappearing in America, you simply haven't been paying attention to facts.

    121. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could barely tie my shoe laces when I was 11 let alone come out with: "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way." That's a very special comment right there.

      Then my son (8yo) is brillant as well because when his sister recently asked him "what could possibly go wrong?"....he calmly and clearly stated "I could fall down the stairs and break my head open OR the planet might explode."

      Sorry, I missed the planning stages of this conversation so I'm not sure yet what the precise threat to the planet is, but as soon as he whiteboards it out for me, I'll get back to you.

    122. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      I went through that. By the end of mandatory education I'd stopped caring altogether, not turning up on half the days and failing most of the exams, just to make the condescending remarks stop.

      It took a few years to recover from that damage.

    123. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does "your" sound different than "you're," or "yore" for that matter?

    124. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I flunked out of my community college. Twice. Took three tries to pass College Algebra I, as well. Eventually, I retook all those courses and then went on to art school where I dropped out to fix computers. College isn't for everyone.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    125. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jozette Lucero - I'm guessing they're fake

    126. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by debiansid · · Score: 1

      They'll probably say, "It's You're and not Your you idiot!!" ;)

    127. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by gonzonista · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Has it occurred to you that he already knows he is smarter than everyone else and understands that saying so is not likely to win him any friends? He made a politically correct statement and will do well by it. There's a lot of smart people on Slashdot but some are not smart enough to get that you have to get along with others if you want a life. Telling people how much smarter you are than them is a good way to ensure you spend Friday night in the basement playing video games.

      --
      If absolute power corrupts absolutely, what does this say about renewable power?
    128. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      As opposed to every other college grad that only has one degree?
      Yes that is why I suggested that he stay in community college for a few years. At least until he is 16 if not 18. That way he can stay at home with his parents and still have friends like a normal kid. He could develop new interests at the Community College. Maybe take some art classes, history, or even welding. If he wants to keep take science classes then that would fine as well but I do think he needs to gain age before he goes off to university.

      Heck I question the amount of real-life experience of most people on Slashdot anyway. This kid for some odd reason seems to be infused with modesty and good manners. Two attributes that seem to hold no value on Slashdot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    129. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by steelfood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think he's just being humble, but the manner in which he does it is quite remarkable. He's not saying everybody is smart. He's saying that everybody has something they excel at, and that just because somebody isn't an astrophysicist at 11 or won't be a scientist at all doesn't mean that person isn't a genius in some other way. And it's a very meaningful recognition that everybody's abilities and hence their specialties are and will be different. There's nothing wrong with humility, there's nothing wrong with a bit of idealism, and there's nothing wrong with some realistic encouragement.

      There is, however, something very wrong with writing off that most people are just plain stupid. That's just narrowminded thinking. That may be true for adults, as they are set in their ways. But kids are of unlimited potential, and there really is no telling what they can contribute to society until they grow up. To insist otherwise is not only incorrect, but does children a grave injustice, and only exacerbates the education problem.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    130. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "Just because most kids can't make up their minds until they are old farts who think they are still young doesn't mean that this budding genius should deliberately feign indecisiveness so that his peers feel good about themselves."
      Yes but is it even possible that an eleven year old really know what he wants to do. Even then interests change even after one becomes an adult.
      This young person as a great opportunity to gain a lot of knowledge in a variety of subjects. IMHO all knowledge has value even if the value is "I really don't like that subject".
      It will be a hard balance to strike for this person. To keep him interested and not push him into adulthood before he is ready.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    131. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Why do you think superhero fees are so expensive? It's because they only get real work once or twice a decade. The rest of the time, they're relegated to saving frightened cats and laying their capes down for old ladies.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    132. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 1

      No, but then again, my mother wasn't Laura Bush.

    133. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Alarindris · · Score: 1

      Parent is not insightful. The kid is 11. No hormones = doesn't give a shit about what girls think. When he wants to put his dick in them, that's when the awkwardness starts.

    134. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Matter, dude. Matter.

    135. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Telling people how much smarter you are than them is a good way to ensure you spend Friday night in the basement playing video games.

      You're missing the point. It's not about saying how much smarter he is (though obviously his parents and teachers are already doing that, ad nauseum). It's about not saying obviously patronizing stuff about how everyone else is just as smart as he is. When you tell the kid who does spend every Friday night in the basement playing video games (instead of doing the hard work that this kid obviously spent his Friday nights doing) that he's just as smart as an astrophysicist, you're telling that couch potato kid that he doesn't have to worry about his place in the world, or fret about personal discipline, or strive to position himself for a challenging future - nope! He's just as smart as an astrophysicist, yessiree! Don't give it another thought! Pass the bag of chips and a game controller!

      When a kid this smart reinforces the notion that he's nothing special, what does that say to the kid who doesn't understand whether or how to make anything of himself? Sugarcoating the hard work that's reflected in that academic degree just robs it of meaning.

      You want to talk about needing to get along with others? I know plenty of smarty-pants academics and techno/science nerds, and many of them are socially awkward (to say the least). But the most obnoxious, hardest-to-work-with, least appealing people I've ever met? The ones who are still coasting with the inflated sense of self esteem that was shoved down their throat in public school, and who are - out in the real world - just starting to figure out that they're not nearly as special as their grade inflation would have led them to believe, and they're trying to make up for that through sheer bluster, BS, and deflection whenever reality comes anywhere nearby. Those are the people who are hard to get along with, because they're realizing that they aren't who they've been told they are, and it's got them rather angry.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    136. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by davidsyes · · Score: 1

      Evil Genious?

      Don't rush him. He's a sleeper, and a TaiRaelian, arriving here via a wormhole, and he has a plan. He will exceed Ken Starling...

      --
      Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
    137. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He seems to be doing better with relating to girls than many slashdotters

      That will likely change rapidly once he starts wanting sex from them. The cute, harmless 11 year old student is very different than then horny 15 year old thesis advisor

    138. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      And how exactly do you pronounce either of them differently? If the writer is merely quoting the kid in text form, you'd have to yell at the writer for their bad grammar.

    139. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Chlorine+Trifluoride · · Score: 1

      I'm ignoring your argument, because I'm better than you.

    140. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If you're jealous, console yourself with the thought that he'll probably never get laid. Or go round and give hime the mother of all wedgies.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    141. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by kkwst2 · · Score: 1

      And perhaps we should have a long discussion with you about a couple little things called humor and irony.

    142. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He is simply smart enough to know that no one will like him unless he is modest about his accomplishments.

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      I would laugh at him for spelling "you're" incorrectly.

    143. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you rather he did pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories to tell at parties?

      According to the article he wants to be a movie actor, so I think the answer might be "yes". Aside from the obvious networking opportunities, what happens when he gets offered the "guy at party #1" role?

      I'm halfway serious, BTW. It's easier to play a role which you have some familiarity with, that's for sure. Having a variety of life experiences might be a good thing for this kid...

    144. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      With two years of study, what can you honestly say that you know about astrophysics? After 2 years, you have received a foundation for upper level mathematics, a foundation for upper level physics, and a foundation for upper level chemistry. These are all well and good, but until you build on the foundation, you don't really know much, nor are you really able to apply what you have learned in a significantly meaningful way. To say you have a degree in Astrophysics suggests that you have had significant breadth and depth of education specifically in the field of astrophysics. This simply is not reasonably possible with an AA degree.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    145. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing the point. It's not about saying how much smarter he is (though obviously his parents and teachers are already doing that, ad nauseum). It's about not saying obviously patronizing stuff about how everyone else is just as smart as he is.

      With all due respect, I think it is you who is missing the point. Why do you perceive his statement as 'patronizing' and not recognize that it is merely humility?

      you're telling that couch potato kid that he doesn't have to worry about his place in the world, or fret about personal discipline...Sugarcoating the hard work that's reflected in that academic degree just robs it of meaning...The ones who are still coasting with the inflated sense of self esteem...hose are the people who are hard to get along with, because they're realizing that they aren't who they've been told they are

      Geez, Aesop, pass the grapes!! For crying out loud, you've turned a comment from a bright 11 year old into some anecdote which, I assume, must be somewhat autobiographical for you (otherwise, I just can't fathom how you got that from his quote).

      I think you're drawing a false parallel between a bright kid being treated as 'normally' as possible and telling the lazy, potato-chip-eating kid that he's a genius too. Personally, I do think that positive reinforcement tends to have more success than trying to subdivide the world into the have's vs have-not's. I agree with you, by the way, that there are certainly the bloated-sense-of-importance types and yes, they're annoying as hell. However, I argue that it's still a parent's job to help your kid(s) find out what they are good at, and help foster that skill(s). There's a world of difference between giving a kid positive reinforcement and convincing them that they're magically gifted.

    146. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by obarel · · Score: 1

      oblig.

      "Forgot prende asked for highly pressing package of power plant profit projections for Pete Porter in Pasadena."

    147. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

      Ha! But, take the other side. If you have a constant supply of evil geniuses at the rate of min 12 per year, you are likely to get off the hook for a looooong time. You know, till you are too old and your ion drive wheelchair is too slow :)

    148. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could barely tie my shoe laces when I was 11 let alone come out with: "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way." That's a very special comment right there.

      bah. that's typical "I'm a filosofer' talk. I learnt that reading toilet walls.

    149. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      One possible theory is that his Taiwanese mother instilled modesty in him. Asian parents generally look upon bragging about one's abilities as almost a sin. Assuming that his mother is the traditional Asian parent, this may be one reason behind his behavior.

      For example, when someone (who is generally known as a good cook) cooks a meal for friends and family, the cook will probably say something like "this dish is not that good, but I hope you will enjoy it".

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    150. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by syousef · · Score: 1

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      He knows he's special. He's just learnt that people resent it if he doesn't display a fake humility. In other words he's learnt that to fit in socially, one soemtimes has to lie in order to make others comfortable. A lesson a few slashdotters could probably learn. Not a shame at all. Smart kid.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    151. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Don't be asinine. If the kid is smart enough to get a degree in astrophysics at 11, he's smart enough to know he's got to downplay his gifts to have any chance at a normal social life.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    152. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by nausea_malvarma · · Score: 1

      "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way." That's a very special comment right there. It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      Or maybe he's so smart, he's learned life's most valuable lesson: Nobody will be your friend if you act like an asshole.

    153. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah, not autobiographical. Just observational.

      This kid, and much of commentary surrounding him and his own comments, just touches on that whole tangle of issues surrounding the phony self esteem movement, outcome-based grading and graduation policies (social promition), and all of the baggage that it produces in kids that are not as bright as the one in question. I just find it unfortunate that he has to add any fuel to that smelly fire, that's all.

      I do think that positive reinforcement tends to have more success than trying to subdivide the world into the have's vs have-not's

      Who's talking about assigning people into "have-not" status? I want people to have. I'm bothered by the strange cultural traditions of modern education and child rearing that seem explicitly planned to set kids up for an unpleasant crash into have-not status because they haven't been prepared for what it takes to actually create the value in life that gets you into "have" mode. When you're a kid, you're often paid in the currency of praise. There is runaway inflation in that currency right now, but no consequences for that until later, when the kid is on his or her own, and the real world shows up. Then, the praise currency is swapped out for grocery/rent/insurance currency, and nobody is doling any of it out to see if that will make you more productive later.

      The real world pays for results. The self esteem movement pays for existence. It's cruel to not help kids figure that out early. The positive reinforcement you prefer has to actually reinforce something. Like, say, an achievement of some kind - even if modest. The problem is that "existing" is being treated like an achievement, now - and that wretchedly skews a kid's sense of causality, and of future prospect as the fruit of actual work and dedication.

      Any time a genuinely motivated kid like the one in question plays down the fact that his (genuine) achievement is the result of an unfortunately rare level of hard work and dedication, it chips away at the wider cultural message that prosperity in life comes from having a work ethic. For some reason, too many adults think they need to hide that fact from their kids, as if it were mean to say it out loud or something. When a kid like this has the pulpit, as he does at the moment, it would be nice if he didn't feel social pressure to obscure that fact ... or if the adults who choose which of his sentences to reproduce in an article didn't make it appear that way.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    154. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Schnoogs · · Score: 1

      The kid is 11. Why are you trying to dump on his accomplishment. I know a lot of adults who would fail all of the courses you list. Talk about a troll job.

      He's 11 and did Physics with Calculus. End of discussion.

    155. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most likely factor here that makes this so possible for this kid is not that they are particularly brilliant beyond any other child, but that they have a family that supports and motivates them. What are the odds you'll be studying astrophysics or getting a chance to attend college as a kid if you come from a single parent family with three kids and you're crammed in a tiny house and your parent works all the time and you almost never see them and you don't even get the $2.00 every day that you need to buy a school lunch?

      Also, as great an accomplishment as this is... DUDE... a degree in astrophysics... FROM A COMMUNITY COLLEGE... Uh. Yeah. Great.

    156. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or, maybe he's just using language he knows will win approval.
      Thats not so special (at any age). If a politician made that comment I'd think they were full of *it, and he may be considerably brighter than most of them.

    157. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by IRWolfie- · · Score: 1

      At the very least one would expect a module in General Relativity or at least Special relativity in an astrophysics course.

    158. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might discover slashdot

    159. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by shiba_mac · · Score: 1

      It's also possible he's smart enough to realise he'll sound like a right little fucker if he calls himself a genius. A bit of false modesty goes a long way.

    160. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      It's a simple fact, no matter how hard 99.99999% of kids work, they'll never come close to accomplishing what this kid has done before his first kiss. In fact, even on Slashdot, this guy is so far beyond the level most of us are at, we'll never be able to catch up.

      Would you rather he say that? "I am naturally superior to the vast majority of human beings. No amount of hard work will match even the simplest of my achievements because the clarity of my thought far surpasses even adults my age. Any dreams or ambitions you once had are trivial and petty compared to my greatness."

      --
      It's been a long time.
    161. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      I'm so great, I'm ignoring BOTH of you.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    162. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Caffeinate · · Score: 1

      But the under-achieving glue sniffer has his own smarts - he knows that he doesn't need to work hard, just hard enough. He also knows not to get his nose too close to the glue because that stuff is hard to get off once it sets . . .

      --
      Godless heathen.
    163. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      I think an associate's degree at age 11 is just about the right time for something horrible to happen that will corrupt him into turning evil.

      He will discover girls.

      He sounds like a nerd in the making.
      He will discover his hand (and then porn).

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    164. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by jerpyro · · Score: 1

      He will discover girls.

      No, no he won't.

    165. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      String theory is a joke by some hipster somewhere.

      "Ok, so it's beautiful and complicated, but we can't test it because it doesn't actually predict anything."

      It's like a deconstruction of science, and reconstruction into the exact thing it isn't.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    166. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 1

      its not so much "brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual" as "Brainwashed into thinking everyone is special"

      --
      I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
    167. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      That's a fair point, however you have to realize that the media was already taking a statement from him. Would you respect an 11-year-old graduate whose only reply was "Booya!"? No, you'd probably wonder who he--or his parents--paid off.

      What are the ways he could come off? Keeping in mind that the media will take a one-sentence soundbyte at best no matter what he says?
      * Sincerely modest
      * Insincerely modest
      * Trying hard to sound modest when he isn't
      * Trying hard to sound competent when he isn't
      * Trying hard not to sound like he did something wrong (cheating) even though he did
      * Momma's boy / Daddy's boy
      * Offhandedly arrogant
      * Deliberately arrogant
      * Overwhelmingly disdainful

      Now, alright, that's a partial list and I know it, but if I took someone with genuine ability and wanted to bring them up, I wouldn't want them thinking that anything below "Insincerely modest" was acceptable.

      And even setting that aside, what would you want his box-quote to be? "I think I set myself above the others because they were out being children like they were supposed to while I was working myself to the bone in a way that sets myself apart from them so far that I may never have a social life again. But on the plus side, every time I mention to this glorious achievement to anyone ever again, they'll all think I'm an arrogant prick!"?

    168. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by gonzonista · · Score: 1

      It's true that playing video games is not the same as getting a degree in astrophysics. However, I think that getting people to believe that they have the talent to do something and failing is ultimately better than having them believe they can't do anything.

      As for getting along with others, being intelligent is not a prerequisite for being a jerk. Bragging about how smart you are, regardless of whether you are or are not, will not help you win friends and influence people.

      --
      If absolute power corrupts absolutely, what does this say about renewable power?
    169. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by The+Slashdot+8Ball · · Score: 1

      (+5) Interestingly enough, later on in his career Bobby Fischer thought that chess had become "just memorization and prearrangement" as people were playing well by simply memorising opening series of moves. He was a fan of variants of 'Shuffle Chess' where the back row is randomised so that a player couldn't just 'play by the book'

      With this in mind, it could be interesting to study the teaching methods used by Polgar; my inner cynic suggests that as he owned thousands of books on chess, was regarded as an expert on chess theory but was only a moderate player his lessons may have consisted of "this is an effective but rarely used opening, memorise it!"

    170. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by 3fiddy · · Score: 1

      They would probably make fun of his grammatical errors, especially on /.

    171. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pay more attention to the "at age 16" part. Did you have a lot of "real-life experience" at 16? Was whatever you were doing at age 16 the "be-all end-all" of your career?

      Having a few degrees at 16 just means that when you do decide to start on a career, you have a bunch more choices and opportunities available than otherwise. Because you sure as hell wouldn't be starting your career at 11.

    172. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

      I think an associate's degree at age 11 is just about the right time for something horrible to happen that will corrupt him into turning evil.

      He will discover girls.

      ... So we won't hear from him on Slashdot, then?

      --
      "Cats like plain crisps"
    173. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      someone's been watching big bang theory?

    174. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I'm sure memorizing openings was part of it, as it is for every great chess player, but you can't win at chess with just the openings. No one can. And of course, you can look at the games of his daughters, it is clear that they understood more than that.

      I own one of the books Laszlo wrote. It is a book of 5000 checkmate puzzles. He wrote it not so you can memorize all of them, but so that you could have enough chess puzzles to practice them every day and not run out for a long time. He also suggested that in addition to puzzles, you play at least one real game every day, even if it's just against a computer. I'm sure he had other techniques, but I don't know them. I've tried to find his book, "Bring up Genius!" but I couldn't find it anywhere. If anyone knows where, or if it's even available in English, please let me know.

      --
      Qxe4
    175. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am better than everyone else you insensitive clod!

    176. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by thrawn_aj · · Score: 1

      Would you rather he did pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories to tell at parties?

      Oh, and you've been watching too many government-funded anti-pot campaigns. A person does not "Do Pot". They smoke it. Or eat it. But they don't "do" pot, just like when someone goes drinking they don't "Do Alcohol", and in the morning when you get up with a headache you don't "Do Aspirin".

      *roll* Consider my statement duly amended:

      Would you rather he smoked or ate pot, get drunk and have all sorts of cool stories to tell at parties?

      I probably shouldn't be responding to AC (probably wanted to mod and post in the same thread :P - but I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just forgot to login =D) but you raised an interesting point anyway so what the hell. My post did imply that I thought they were mutually exclusive. I do not actually think that so I must not have been very clear there.

      My beef is with American society (especially) thinking that it's ok for a person to have just "real world experience" (again, whatever the frak that means), be it ever so stupid and underachieving while not having an iota of intellectual achievement to his/her name because ... what is it good for anyway? It is that asymmetry that I object to. I've concluded that it's a deep-seated fetish with "salvation", (perhaps a residue of evangelism?) to the extent that a person from a perfectly normal family can sometimes feel the need to fall ... so that he may then save himself and ... I dunno, get a chance to write a book about it? And that's really the heart of the point I was trying (but failed) to make: society doesn't give a shit about people who make it because they had opportunities and used them to the fullest (like this kid is trying to do with his ability to not be myopic in his outlook). In fact, said achievements are frequently devalued in favor of much those much inferior simply because the latter had the foresight to first f**k up his/her life to an insane degree and then "rise from the filth", reborn and whatnot :P.

      And people are surprised that the steady, hardworking part of the population is being royally screwed in the rear as their taxes are used to subsidize not just the underprivileged (that is perfectly fine, it is our duty as a civilized society after all) but also the deliberate fuckups (which is NOT alright). The last was not an offtopic rant; it is merely symptomatic of this deeper glitch in the American gestalt.

    177. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want super heroes? Look at the nonprofit sector; not at their boards of directors, but at the volunteers.

    178. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Bad Advice. I say build a nuclear-powered robot army and destroy anyone that doesn't appreciate your personality.

    179. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by beav007 · · Score: 1

      Maybe we could get him to explain how a black hole can accidentally a whole star...

    180. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      Didn't your mother ever teach you never to pass on an opportunity to alliterate?

      Hey! I can *so* read.

    181. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your all stupidheads!"

      I'm pretty sure he'd use the correct "You're" even if he was speaking.

    182. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by deek · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he's just smart enough to realise this: no matter how smart you are, there will always be many people that know things you do not, and can do things you cannot do. You will meet people like this every day. They deserve respect, unless they're arrogant about their abilities.

    183. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      THIS! No doubt he, or at least his parents, were THINKING that. But saying it, you're right... he's clearly very astute. Or at least he remembers very well what he is coached to say.

    184. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      Hello and welcome to Slashdot. Please leave your modesty and humility at the door. You can collect them again when you leave. Enjoy your stay.

    185. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's most unusual is achieving the degree so early, which can only be accomplished with fanatical parents. Why couldn't my parents have treated me like a psychology experiment? Lucky bastard.

    186. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Add that to the fact that if they consider themselves 'smart enough,' they may have absolutely nothing left to drive them. If they get enough challenge at school, it will be of the "how much of this stuff can you cram into your memory at once" kind, which won't do shit for you a couple of weeks after you've dumped all the factoids onto the exam paper like a careless airport baggage handler and never looked back, and certainly won't stimulate anyone's intellect.

      "It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education." - Albert Einstein

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    187. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your all stupidheads!"

      I would think that even if he were maligning another persons intelligence, he would be intelligent enough to use the correct form of a word! It would be "You are all stupidheads" or even "You're all stupidheads."

    188. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TSPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Of course you should argue, you are as smart as he is!

    189. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.

      Perhaps, but 95% of the people would probably say "You all suck balls"...

    190. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Agreed. The correct, tactful response is something akin to

      While I may have a bit more natural ability than the average person, the true key to my success was my work ethic. I put in hours and hours blah blah.

      Humbly acknowledging his natural abilities and inspiration, yet placing more emphasis on the perspiration.

      It lets unsuccessful people save face, but still creates the possibility that his success will inspire a lazy kid to work harder.

      There's likely a more elegant way to say what I proposed. But the idea is twofold: (1) acknowledge your gifts humbly, and (2) emphasize the hard work you put in.

    191. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      God, I hope so. Success can turn a person into a Grade A asshole.

      Note for this story: When I speak of how great I was in math, I mean compared to my peers in my small town. I am above average at math, but am very much dwarfed by a number of people on this very forum (which shows how dumb I really am!). I do not intend to brag, for there is nothing to brag about. I only intend to recount how I stopped a little genius from being an asshole.

      There was a kid about three years younger than us working his way through high school math with us. I was always in different classes from him, and being gifted and interested in math, I stayed ahead of my peers by a year. I had almost completed all math requirements at my high school early, so I took a break from math classes in general (there was nothing at the local community college I could have moved on to anyway) to focus on CS, public speaking, and the social sciences I'd missed out on (we were on a block system, so it was possible to accelerate your class schedule).

      After I returned to the last math classes offered in my high school, my peers and the kid had caught up with me in the schedule. Now, I had heard about how smart this kid was, but how he seemed to gleefully demonstrate how much smarter he was than other people ("Don't you know anything?," e.g.). Of course kids don't understand tact well at his age.

      In any case, I spent that semester in class with him pointing out all of his mistakes in his work when we were paired together for work (just as a statement of fact, I was most likely the strongest mathematician of my graduating class or one class before or after me, which is why I was able to do what others were not). He took the hint and stopped being an asshole to other people.

      Now I completely acknowledge I'm no longer a comparatively brilliant math student. I sold out and went to law school after getting a degree in math. In fact, one of my friends a year younger than me took a number of grad-level math classes at the same university as me. He's surely surpassed me in math ability. Outside of the limited high school setting, my math ability is above average but nothing special at all. Hell, that little kid probably has a Ph.D. in low-dimensional topology or something right now, having surpassed me. But he's hopefully a nice guy now, thanks to my ridiculous emotional bullying. ;)

      The only point of this story is that young, brilliant children can be major assholes, and sometimes it takes them meeting a superior intellect (granted I was older than him, so I only mean "absolutely superior," not "relatively superior") to put them in their place.

      I hope this kid isn't an asshole. He's got a chance at some 20-year-old women judging by parent's picture. He should be getting all in there, not treating them like crap. Good luck, young adventurer!

    192. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there's a super-duper evil genius right now who is plotting to kidnap his mother to turn him into a revenge-motivated evildoer!

      His mother is from Taiwan, they are nice people. It's his father who is the Jew, and therefore hated by all!

      (before you mod me antisemetic, look at my username)

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    193. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      I would hope at least one person would point out: It's "you're," not "your." I guess your astrophysics degree didn't teach you proper spelling! ;)

    194. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      he hasn't even hit puberty

      Damn! All those brains to attract the ladies and not a body to use with them.

    195. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      He will discover girls.

      Why weren't there any girls in my physics lab? :(

    196. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. [...] Your all stupidheads!"

      How about "get back to your English class"? ;-)

    197. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      Sign him up for R. O. A. C. H.

      http://io9.com/5256698/meet-real+life-supervillain-society-roach

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    198. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      I think an associate's degree at age 11 is just about the right time for something horrible to happen that will corrupt him into turning evil.

      He will discover girls.

      or Slashdot, and miss them

    199. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was a kid Batman and Robin used to incarcerate one or more evil villains every week (with possible exceptions of double episodes).

    200. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about you, but most prepubescent boys don't relate well to girls.

    201. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. He is simply smart enough to know that no one will like him unless he is modest about his accomplishments.

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      You mean "*You're* all stupidheads". He'd probably get that right, being a genius and all

    202. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... Your all stupidheads!"

      Your "smart in your own way" niche must be in the sports genre. I just hope it isn't in Ultimate Fighting and you find out who I am. :D

    203. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Nobody said any such thing.

      Your reading comprehension may be a little off, but I'm sure you're smart in your own way too.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    204. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Chickencha · · Score: 1

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      They would say that someone so smart should use apostrophes in his contractions and know the difference between "your" and "you're".

    205. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahem. The correct phrase is, "Why use big words when diminutive ones suffice?"

    206. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      My first thought was "Why is this kid going to a *community college*"? Whether one considers the 2 year degree a big deal for an adult, for an 11 year old it certainly is. I would think that UC Irvine or any of the other universities in that region would have offered the kid a scholarship. Maybe the 2-year CC degree was planned to get their attention for that purpose?

    207. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      l.o.l.

    208. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and more sharks with lasers on their heads!

    209. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by debiansid · · Score: 1

      And how exactly do you pronounce either of them differently? If the writer is merely quoting the kid in text form, you'd have to yell at the writer for their bad grammar.

      Ok, I'm lost. What quote are you talking about? Your GP post has not quoted anyone, he has only made a comment. Also, the two may not be pronounced differently but they most certainly have very different meanings and can easily be identified based on their usage.

    210. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Critical+Facilities · · Score: 1
      Believe it or not, you and I actually agree on a lot of things. I too think that many parents do their kids a disservice by heaping on praise in a seemingly arbitrary manner.

      Any time a genuinely motivated kid like the one in question plays down the fact that his (genuine) achievement is the result of an unfortunately rare level of hard work and dedication, it chips away at the wider cultural message that prosperity in life comes from having a work ethic.

      This is the part where I disagree with you (respectfully, that is). I don't see why there should be any correlation between teaching a "genuinely motivated" kid that humility is an important skill just like any other and this overreaching parenting style which equates splitting the atom with tying one's shoes.

      Moreover, I don't think that because the kid was taught not to be arrogant about his particular abilities that he's somehow unaware of how hard he's had to work (or will have to work) to achieve anything. I must say that I don't see how helping a young, bright kid see his/her peers in a more inclusive manner devalues his/her achievements. In fact, I'd posit that because this kid has been raised with this attitude, perhaps his lack of a condescending attitude towards his peers might just inspire one of the other 'undiscovered' talents of those peers. Let's face it, a lot of kids have a hard time being 'different' even if that difference is a gift of some form (academic, artistic, etc). Maybe a classmate of this obviously gifted/different kid will get to know him and thing 'hey, I'm not a weirdo geek if I'm better as something than most adults'.

    211. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by nomadic · · Score: 1

      That's going to be true with just about any subject, though. What makes a hard science so much more special than a different subject? An associate's degree in astrophysics tells me someone has a basic grounding in the subject, and would be able to assist in basic research--say as a technician at an observatory. Nobody thinks someone with an AA in astrophysics is an astrophysicist.

    212. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This shows that the kid does not have any real world experience. Not everyone in the world is smart. there are some people that are D-U-M dumb!

      captcha: customer

    213. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Never use a large word where a diminutive one will do.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    214. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, and you've been watching too many government-funded anti-pot campaigns. A person does not "Do Pot". They smoke it. Or eat it. But they don't "do" pot, just like when someone goes drinking they don't "Do Alcohol", and in the morning when you get up with a headache you don't "Do Aspirin".

      How about you "do" a nice big cup of shut the fuck up?

    215. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If my experiences are any indication - the social skill deficiencies will emerge later - particularly in a classroom full of peers. I had a friend of mine from high school who was years ahead in most subjects... particularly mathematics. His parents pushed him to excel at everything and from my prospective, there was tremendous pressure from the home-front to be ahead of the curve. He was a kind child for many years and, at first, was happy for the acceptance of his classmates. That soon became arrogance though... and that arrogance got the better of him. Now, I don't know where he is - but last I heard, he was getting himself in trouble and causing a ruckus at his university... just as delinquent as the next underage "frat-boy"... shame really.

    216. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      I went through that. By the end of mandatory education I'd stopped caring altogether, not turning up on half the days and failing most of the exams, just to make the condescending remarks stop.

      It took a few years to recover from that damage.

      Ditto here. But chew on this. If you try to fail and succeed which have you really done?

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    217. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by cbciv · · Score: 1

      What do you think people would say about him if he said "Im the greatest of all time. Divide like a butterfly, add like a bee. Your all stupidheads!"

      That he should learn the difference between possessive pronouns and contractions?

    218. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It's not about saying how much smarter he is (though obviously his parents and teachers are already doing that, ad nauseum

      I doubt they are; unlike some people, they know Latin.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    219. Re:Two Year Associate's Degree of Liberal Arts by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Well, I know that I know Einstein's theories very well when I was 11. I was kind of learning-addicted. We had a VCR without a manual (My dad threw it away right after he bought it), and I found all the functions in it. Including some undocumented ones. I know, because later, I found that the manual was still in our attic.
      I also already liked programming Pascal (Turbo Pascal to be exact), and some Basic. (Which I had to learn from the reference manual only.)

      I guess part of it, was that my mom always just assumed I would be a little genius, that I tried to reach that level.
      But I am far from a genius. I would even call some parts of my psyche underdeveloped.
      My dad was the dumbest person I have ever met. Seriously. An example: He did once take something he thought would be "Sungold California Plums" (metal can with a violet lid) from the shelf, went to the checkout, payed it, put it in a bag, went home, and put it on our eating table, before he (trough us telling him) noticed, that he bought baby wet wipes (plastic can with a violet top). (!!)
      And my mom was so intelligent, that she was not able to live normally, and went a bit crazy, making her somehow pretty unsuccessful too.
      Go figure... ;)

      But I learned one thing, and if I remember this correctly, some scientists confirmed it:
      There is no such thing as "talent". The trick is, to self-motivate yourself as strongly as possible.
      Which as not some stupid thing, like saying that you can do it. It is this:
      Do the hardest thing / take the biggest step, that you just manage to do successfully and without failing. The closer you are to that ideal balance between to hard and too easy, the more will you accelerate.
      What we call "talent", are some early circumstances, that got you going on this self-motivating road. Like supporting parents, having luck to get just the right experiences of success, and then keeping them. So there is no reason your child could not become a "genius". Or that you can motivate yourself that way nowadays.
      Just remember that the key point is the *fun* from the *motivation*. Pressure and stress are the most wrong things you can do. If your child *wants* to do it, then you are doing a good job.

      The other key thing, that all "geniuses" have in common, is to structure your thoughts/knowledge. You can only hold so many things in your brain at the same time. So tie them together with their commonalities, and group them, so that they fit in one single memory slot.
      This (in a simplified view) usually results in some hierarchical system. Or a graph (in the mathematical sense) to be exact. With many dimensions of overlapping/commonalities.
      One example would be chess. A beginner tries to remember the position of every single figure. An amateur might thing that this is the $famousChessTourament tactic. And a professional can just say "this is the $famousChessPlayer setup from $year, with the $famousChessTourament tactic at the left flank, and this pawn in one field closer to the enemy". Three memory slots. For the whole field.
      Interestingly, even sports "geniuses" do some variant of this.

      That's pretty much all there is to it. :)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  2. Games Are a "Waste of Time" by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article

    There is one thing this boy wonder does not like.

    "I feel it's a waste of time playing video games, I feel its a waste of time and it's not helping humanity in any way."

    And GamePolitics' Andrew Eisen notes:

    Perhaps a rather odd statement coming from a lad whose passions include martial arts, scuba diving and playing piano. He also aspires to be a movie actor.

    I found that amusing that he finds some form of entertainment to (music & movies) to benefit humanity more so than games. I wonder if he's ever played Settlers of Catan?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Bryan+Gividen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I don't espouse this particular idea (nor do I argue against it), the boy may see a difference between art and entertainment. Generally, video games are classified as popular entertainment that uses technical skills commonly employed in arts, but video games themselves are not considered art. However, movies are commonly considered an art form which also is employed as entertainment.

      Like I said, I'm not for or against that idea, but it seems like a logical distinction and could account for his preference.

    2. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's 11 years old, for god's sakes. He most certainly is wonderfully bright and talented, with a terrific future before him, but do you really think he has his own opinions already?

    3. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      I think he correctly intuits that martial arts, scuba diving and piano are much better at cultivating a healthy mind and body than sitting around playing Halo is. The movie-actor bit, I grant you, is a little closer to a contradiction.

      Videogames have some rewards (and I'm very interesting in videogames) but at an incredible opportunity cost in leisure time.

    4. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bull. Shit.
      He's spouting off what his teachers and parents feed to him.

      I can just picture a middle-aged english teacher complaining about kids not reading anymore, and then having "film fridays" for her class.

      Remember, it's educational if you call it a film, it's deplorable trash and a waste of time if it's a movie.

    5. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by wkurzius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Everything I needed to learn about wagon-wheel axles I learned from Oregon Trail.

    6. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yup. I like my video games (and freely allow my kids to play them), but I'm not under the delusion that they make you a better person...

      Nor am I under the delusion that they have zero benefit... yet, nearly anything else (except watching TV or reading blogs) will have more benefit given the time spent playing games.

      Of course, there's no rule that says anything leisurely requires doing something beneficial (although a certain amount of "down time" is often beneficial to people); the problem with video games is that people spend WAY too much time doing it. Everything in moderation, right?

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    7. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Actor = contradiction?

      Maybe he intends to be President of the United States (or some position of great power).

      Movie-actor isn't so bad preparation for that role ;).

      Be prepared to welcome your ex-child-genius martial artist, scuba diving, piano playing Overlord...

      --
    8. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if he's ever played Settlers of Catan?

      If he would, I'm pretty sure he would beat the shit out of you at it.

    9. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the TV & blogs. PBS & reading the blogs of leading open source developers are still probably better. Maybe you mean watching youtube?

    10. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between playing a piano and playing music on an ipod. I think that's the distinction here. To him, it is a waste of time to play games, but perhaps not a waste of time to make a game.

      With that in mind, he could become wealthy someday! Or become the next Einstein.

    11. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by thebheffect · · Score: 1

      Again, it depends on what games you play. Historically-oriented games (Age of Empires, Civilization, etc..) can give a very good basic foundation of human history, while any decent RTS or RPG can foster mathematical and logical decision making abilities. Plus, there have been studies on eye-hand coordination and pattern recognition that point in favor of playing video-games.

      In all, these things can make you a 'better' person much in the same way piano playing and scuba diving can. If they all enrich the quality of your life, who's going to say it hasn't made you a better person?

    12. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Eil · · Score: 1

      I found that amusing that he finds some form of entertainment to (music & movies) to benefit humanity more so than games.

      What Moshe means is that today's video games are basically engineered to be time wasters. There's no real intellectual challenge to them, nothing to be learned. Just mow down the bad guys, pick up the loot, and move on to the next level. I used to be a huge gamer when I was a teen, playing PC and console games anywhere from 2 to 8 hours a day until one evening I realized I wasn't "getting" anything out of it. I quit cold-turkey, picked up programming and system administration instead and haven't looked back.

      "Perhaps a rather odd statement coming from a lad whose passions include martial arts, scuba diving and playing piano. He also aspires to be a movie actor."

      I don't find this odd at all. If you take up martial arts, you learn discipline and self-defense. These are pretty important lessons for anyone, even better if they're internalized at a young age. Scuba diving allows one to study and sometimes interact with underwater life. An understanding of aquatic ecosystems could inspire him to contribute to the field of biology some day. Learning the piano (or any instrument) can be the first step to an advanced understanding of music theory and creativity. Could we be looking at our next Bach? Probably not, but you never know for sure. Being a good actor is really hard and is a pretty lofty goal. You have to understand a lot about the human condition and be able to reproduce any aspect of it on cue.

      Video games? Well, I have nothing against people who choose to spend their free time playing them. I'm known to fire up a game of Quake once in awhile, but I don't try to delude myself into thinking that I'm not just deliberately killing some time. And games are perfectly fine when added to a social gathering (e.g., "party games" like Smash Bros or Mario Kart), but by and large, nothing is really learned from solitary or online gaming. No matter how good you get, a high score or x number of frags will never contribute to society or individual development in any conceivable sense.

    13. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very few people outside of the USA call them "movies".

    14. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just curious can you even scuba dive at 11? You have to be certified to do any scuba diving, does anyone know if there is a age requirement for getting a scuba certification?

    15. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Um, I like AoE and Civ and all, but anyone who tries to draw any kind of foundation of human history from those games is due for a rude awakening when they actually start to study human history. They are horrible - horrible - models for history; that they create a single, static category ("the civilization") that evolves, unbroken, from prehistory to the future, unifying language, race, religion, economics and government into a single playable entity... I mean, really, was a prehistoric Abe Lincoln researching metallurgy with the stone-age Americans, who all adopted Monotheism by collective fiat some time before creating Feudalism?

      Also, the opportunity cost is a big deal. In the time a teenager plays one full game of Civ, they could have read "Guns, Germs and Steel" - or seen a much more in-depth documentary. Civ is fun as a game, but as a pedagogical device, it's crap.

    16. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by thebheffect · · Score: 1

      I didn't specify you took it as 'an exact historical reference'. I know a very basic history of what Saladin and the Saracens were all about because of the campaign mode in AoE. If I were to ask the majority of my friends who Saladin was, they'd be lucky to say 'some Muslim'.

      I'm not going to write a book report on Saladin. But I did learn something new, through a medium that most teenagers probably enjoy more.

      As for Civ, that game is rich in problem solving with a historical angle. If I were a parent, I would be overjoyed if my kid liked playing it.

    17. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are quite right. This also indicates that he isn't really all that intelligent. He is average at most. Possibly below average. He is able to tick the boxes and do what he's told. Probably studied most of his free time under whip of his parents which is how he finished his very unimpressive degree.

      He completely lacks insight and the capacity for critical thinking. If he had these skills he would understand how important all media are in their contribution to culture. Games encompass all of the contributions of books, music and movies and more. But as I said, he lacks critical thought and thus can't draw any conclusions from his own analysis but is only able to latch onto the opinion of so many luddites who view games as useless or damaging society simply because they don't understand them and certainly never tried playing them.

    18. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything I needed to learn about wagon-wheel axles I learned from Oregon Trail.

      And dying of dysentery.

    19. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      What you learned about Saladin could have been better learned, with more accuracy and more quickly, in 5 minutes, by reading the Wikipedia page about Saladin.

      That you pick up a couple bits of trivia about history (sans historical context or broader significance) doesn't turn AoE into a tool for learning, any more than an episode of a TV show that mentions Saladin would. I would actually prefer that you just enjoyed the game as a game, or maybe say it inspired you to research more about the Crusades, etc. Because what it actually directly teaches you is nearly worthless.

      It's like people who insist that their junk food contains "all four food groups." Better to enjoy for enjoyment's sake than to fool yourself into thinking you're doing something good for you....

    20. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly, kids parrot what they're told by adults all the time without really understanding why that opinion is held.

      In a way, the angst-ridden period of teenager-dom where a kid is contrary simply for the sake of being contrary would seem to be necessary in the process of developing independent thoughts/opinions.

    21. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Wrong.

      First and foremost, games teach problem solving. You'd know this if you've ever spent time watching people fail at video games. It's embarrassing, really, to watch people struggle with concepts like 'bring the key to the door without getting hit by a monster' (the person I'm referring to was one who actually called me to help them fill up their car with gas, because they couldn't figure it out... true story). Someone who's spent a lot of time playing video games will, in most cases, be able to quickly identify problems and their solutions simply because they've trained their brains to do so. Admittedly, they'll be more proficient at saving virtual princesses than babies in a burning building or what have you, but the basic problem solving processes remain the same for real life.

      Video games also teach through osmosis. Well, not exactly osmosis, but I think you get what I'm saying. Games are often designed by intelligent people, and written by highly literate writers (at least, they used to be). There's no telling how much of my vocabulary was gleaned from video games. The text in video games isn't somehow worth less than the text in books just because it's pixelated. And experience, even virtual experience, also tends to teach better than sheer memorization for a test. I don't think I'd know what the Nemean games were, had I not had seen my athletes trotting off to attend them every two years in 'Zeus: Master of Olympus'.

      Finally, when it comes down to it, 99% of video games are just math. Most have easy math: if I have ten sniper rounds, and enemies take two shots to kill, should I detour to get more ammo before attempting to cross the hall with six enemies? However, a good number of them have fairly complex math: deciding which pieces of gear to put on while maximizing both STR and AGI with STR having a higher value is an excellent example of a knapsack problem. Read into some of the 'theorycrafting' for games like World of Warcraft for better examples.

      Mine is a weak argument for sure, but you can't say video games are good for nothing. I mean, at the very least they improve your reaction time.

    22. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yes... that was part of my point. You can derive some benefit from video games, but the cost/benefit is a lot more expensive than reading a book or doing something else. I mean, you know what else improves eye/hand coordination? Just about any sport. Especially ones that use a racket. And it improves you're overall health, too.

      I also debate any learning you'd get from paying Civ or Ages of the Empires. I'm not saying none of the games out there are beneficial, though.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    23. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by thebheffect · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, I never called it a tool for learning. I was removing the notion that video games are worthless investments of time. They can be fun, enjoyable, and engaging of the mind. I collected resources, determined the best way to eliminate a defended site, and learned a little Saracen history. If you don't see any benefit from that, you're being obstinate.

      If my kid wanted to know more about the Saracens, I wouldn't boot up AoE, I'd direct him to a book, or Wikipedia, as you said. I never said, "I'm going to teach my kid using AoE." That's a ridiculous statement. I did say I'd be overjoyed if my kid liked to play it, because I personally know it can be quite a catalyst for further learning.

    24. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't find this odd at all. If you take up martial arts, you learn discipline and self-defense.

      When I took martial arts at his age, I learned dance. Actually, ballet classes would have better suited me at that age, because in martial arts (the classes I was in at that age) were more about memorizing some specific routines than anything else. And with ballet, you'd learn base moves and then work with choreographers (or be one) to combine them into something greater than the sum of the parts. But then, I could have just had crap martial arts...

      Scuba diving allows one to study and sometimes interact with underwater life.

      There's a hell of a lot of self discipline with SCUBA, more so than children's martial arts. You control your breathing. You follow a set of instructions. You don't deviate from them, or you can die. You don't panic, or you can die. Martial arts is "I got an owie, stop please." SCUBA is "I'm down 60 feet, if I take a breath and ascent, I'll get an air embolism and could lose use of a lung for the rest of my life. If I stay down too long, I'll get the bends, and could have early onset of arthritis for life. Though unlikely, both of those conditions can kill me as well."

      Personally, I like SCUBA because it's like a sensory deprivation chamber. In most cases, you can hear your own breathing, and nothing else. In most cases, you see only you and your companions, and no other people. And you do so in an alien environment. Fish? They are just scenery.

    25. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by j79zlr · · Score: 1

      Everything I needed to learn about wagon-wheel axles I learned from Oregon Trail.

      They break right before an exceptionally tough winter where you lose 5 oxen? That is what I learned.

      --
      I'm not not licking toads.
    26. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      At the risk of derailing the whole discussion, who cares about all these random facts, except as a curiosity?

      What's the benefit to knowing history? Or really, anything outside of your comfy zone where you get paid and pay others to do things or give/take things?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    27. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Bugs42 · · Score: 1

      today's video games are basically engineered to be time wasters. There's no real intellectual challenge to them, nothing to be learned.

      You're totally right. There are absolutely no video games out there that require any thought whatsoever.

      There's more to the gaming world than Halo and GTA (not that there's anything wrong with them, I enjoy both of those series, I just happen to like other games as well).

      --
      Programmer: an ingenious device that converts caffeine into code.
    28. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      The film/movie thing gets to me too. So I decided to call them all movies to stir up the pretentious wankers.

    29. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      What he's said is perfectly rational and doesn't fit in with what you've said.

      The kid said it's a waste of time playing video games. Obviously playing games does not help humanity. However, he implies that making movies is. Martial arts (again, an art people can enjoy watching--I sure do) and scuba (enabling study and photography, another art) are similar to making movies.

      The distinction is that playing video games is not productive for society. Making them is.

    30. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by sexconker · · Score: 1

      That's all well and good, but the best reactions will be in the real world (unless you have an IMDB account for some reason).

      Other real-world gear grinders:
      Novel -> Book
      Painting -> Picture

      On the internet, I would also recommend:
      Anime -> Cartoon
      Manga -> Comic Book
      Graphic Novel -> Comic Book

    31. Re:Games Are a "Waste of Time" by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      The benefit if knowing history is understanding how we got where we are and avoiding the prophecy of "those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

      But I would agree that having to memorize specific dates and names in school is largely useless.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  3. I'm not surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Its not rocket science after all

    1. Re:I'm not surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly isn't if it isn't even a four year degree. His first two years were liberal arts. This shows what a joke US colleges are. The entire FOUR YEARS of a degree MUST be devoted to the topic of that degree. And I mean ALL courses studied. Students should not be wasting time on courses from general education or any other not related to their major. The rest of the world knows the purpose of college. It's to study your chosen field of expertise and ONLY that. Only the US actually makes subjects in your field the MINORITY of the material you studied.

    2. Re:I'm not surprised.... by IRWolfie- · · Score: 1

      Rocket science isnt the part that's difficult, its Rocket engineering where the difficulties come into play!

    3. Re:I'm not surprised.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and not nearly as tough as rocket surgery

  4. Not a genius? He probably is. by davidwr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought genius was defined as something like an IQ in the 98th percentile or higher.

    By the way, most preteens don't have the emotional maturity to succeed in a "normal" college social environment. I'm not saying they can't succeed academically, it's just unlikely they will "fit in" in most college social organizations. We all need to be with our social peers.

    Community college is a bit different as there's less of a social environment. On-line school is also a huge opportunity for "non-traditional" students such as those too young to drive or old enough to not be carded.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  5. oh yeah? by jollyreaper · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think you're smart, kid? Well, I can still kick your ass at teatherball. (I hope.)

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:oh yeah? by Takichi · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think that's unlikely. The kid's won a lot of martial arts competitions. In the video, it shows a trophy that's bigger than he is. AND, he's a good musician. Face it, this kid puts pretty much everyone else to shame mentally, physically, and spiritually. Although, each of us is shameful in our own way.

    2. Re:oh yeah? by root_42 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Think you're smart, kid? Well, I can still kick your ass at teatherball. (I hope.)

      Certainly you can't beat him at spelling...

      --
      [--- PGP key and more on http://www.root42.de ---]
    3. Re:oh yeah? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I hope you can play it better than you can spell it! ;)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:oh yeah? by miggyb · · Score: 1

      I've got him beat in mediocracy and procrastination skills. I bet I can be an order of magnitude more unproductive than he can.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    5. Re:oh yeah? by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      "Face it, this kid puts pretty much everyone else to shame mentally, physically, and spiritually."

      Yea, Well I'd still Pwn his ass at Call of Duty.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    6. Re:oh yeah? by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Well I can beat him at Nintendo.
      And I'm bigger than him.

    7. Re:oh yeah? by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

      He is highly gifted, but... check back in on him in 20 years and see how it's going. Then we'll see how the potential played out.

      I learned long ago that there are always people who are more talented than I am. You can take that information and decide to give up or work harder.

    8. Re:oh yeah? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Good point. AFAIK, these precocious kids usually become less extraordinary when their peers have had time to catch up in adulthood. They usually peter out at some slightly above average ability, and don't continue to advance beyond mortal powers.

    9. Re:oh yeah? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      im sure you can. Now, if he was a physics graduate, perhaps not.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  6. Quote by MLS100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."

    Clearly he has never read Youtube comments.

    1. Re:Quote by sys.stdout.write · · Score: 2, Informative

      Touche. And of course the obligatory link.

    2. Re:Quote by AdamTrace · · Score: 1

      I lol'd

    3. Re:Quote by SpooForBrains · · Score: 1

      Or "Twilight"

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    4. Re:Quote by ThisIsForReal · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, the world population was just over 6.9 billion. Just sayin'...

      --
      -THE END-
    5. Re:Quote by MadHats · · Score: 1

      "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."

      Shut up, Wesley!

      --
      Get lose, you can't compare with my powers.
    6. Re:Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly he has never read Youtube comments.

      Nor any post on Slashdot made by cliffski.

      The very epitome of "not getting it" demonstrated in every, single post he's ever made. It's remarkable.

    7. Re:Quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

  7. Yay, Community College! by vjmurphy · · Score: 0

    "At a time when his peers are finishing 6th grade, this only child of a Taiwanese mother and an Israeli father is trying on a cap and gown preparing to graduate with a 4.0 from community college." The article continues with a quotation by the boy, hinting at his modesty, "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way and it is, after all, only community college."

    Fixed that for him.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
    1. Re:Yay, Community College! by MistrBlank · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, I was impressed until I saw the community college part. This is most likely just a publicity stunt to bring more attention to their crappy little campus.

      If he was really all that impressive, a real university would have sponsored him, particularly since they would probably turn him over to research work until an age appropriate for the working community and in the process developing a sizable portfolio of research and (most likely) publications.

    2. Re:Yay, Community College! by Yold · · Score: 1

      He is 11. I am guessing he will be attending college at a real university. He passed a calculus based physics class, give him some credit.

    3. Re:Yay, Community College! by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Community college, 2-year BA, etc. don't cover it.
      It's ELAC.

    4. Re:Yay, Community College! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think anyone's denying that the kid is gifted, but there is a gaping chasm between an associate's degree in astrophysics (wtf!) and a 4 year degree in the same.

    5. Re:Yay, Community College! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you know that this community college is crappy how?
      it's unfortunate that community colleges get such a bad rap; having been a professional student for a decade or so, i can say that in my experience there's at least as many crappy "real universities" as community colleges. high profile schools have more than enough qualified applicants of 'normal' age to throw out this kid's application without thinking twice. perhaps our child prodigy here was smart enough to realize that if he's going to a crappy school, he might as well not pay 5 times as much as he has to.
      (although admittedly, in your defense, elac really is a crappy school)

    6. Re:Yay, Community College! by MistrBlank · · Score: 1

      If I'm willing to accept that it's a publicity stunt by a community college what makes you think I would be willing to accept that he successfully passed a calculus without some kind of prodding by the staff.

      Honestly, this is a PR stunt and it made it to Slashdot. And most likely will it will make it to CNN. Then next year they'll be charging 20-40% more per new student in tuition coupled with higher application submissions.

  8. Can I just say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    NERD!

  9. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."

    Not only smart, but insightful too :)

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  10. FTFA by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Cavalin is quoted as saying:

    I like to study just because knowledge goes to wisdom and only by wisdom can we help the world

    Wow, what a kid. All the best to him.

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:FTFA by jd · · Score: 1

      Very much agreed. However, I'd just like to throw in my $2.75's worth (have to allow for inflation): I agree with his other comment that there are billions of others who are gifted in their own ways. But there is an implication in that - there are 6.5 billion people who have been failed by their society and educational system so badly that they are incapable of being anything other than bland Joe and Jane Averages.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    2. Re:FTFA by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Or exceptional in less dramatic ways. Your last part reminds me of the Onion article about most of our teachers having teaching disabilities. We could certainly do better as a country and as a species to teach our children. I have to wonder how many more kids could do this well if they were encouraged and provided the means to do so.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:FTFA by mqduck · · Score: 1

      I'm definitely not putting this kid down, but lets be honest: such statements only sound profound coming from the mouth of a child. From an adult they're ordinary and mundane. Point being, he's still an 11-year-old, and 11-year-olds only regurgitate the ideas they learn. The difference, so far, is that this one is a very good learner.

      Or at least that's my impression.

      --
      Property is theft.
    4. Re:FTFA by jd · · Score: 1

      Ruth Lawrence has an IQ probably in the 150-160 region, which puts her in the top 1% to top 0.1% of the population. She graduated only a little after this guy, but with a full degree. She had a PhD and was lecturing at Harvard by the time she was 18.

      The US currently has around 300,000,000 people. Therefore there are 3,000,000 in the top 1%, and 300,000 in the top 0.1%. Three hundred thousand people who are arguably capable of a PhD before most get out of high school.

      Of those three hundred thousand, a couple every decade actually achieve the sorts of results we should be expecting. Are the rest ALL being crippled by computer games, or is there something seriously fucked up with education?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:FTFA by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      Knowledge leads to wisdom.

      Wisdom leads to helping the world.

      Helping the world... leads to suffering.

      I'm not good at being Yoda :(

  11. This kid is going to get laid... by revjtanton · · Score: 1

    Big time! Nothing makes a young lad more popular with the ladies than a degree in Astrophysics from a community college.

    Hey ladies, my love is like T^2 = (4 pi^2 a^3)/(G (m_1+m_2))

    ...I copied the equation from Wolfram|Alpha...I'm smart like the kid said...at searching search engines.

    1. Re:This kid is going to get laid... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but it's probably because he's gained some fame. If you're famous enough, it doesn't matter how ugly your personality or features are.

  12. Big Deal... by racecarj · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got laid at the age of 14. I doubt anyone with a degree in astrophysics is going to beat that.

    1. Re:Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 14? With your teacher? ;-)

    2. Re:Big Deal... by nizo · · Score: 1

      At what age do you stop taking the drugs and seek counseling?

    3. Re:Big Deal... by racecarj · · Score: 1

      no... i just grew up in a rural area. nothing else to do...

    4. Re:Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then came the dot-com burst. Now at 37 you're anonymously trolling Slashdot from your parents basement.

    5. Re:Big Deal... by miggyb · · Score: 1

      ...And yet you continue to be an anonymous coward.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    6. Re:Big Deal... by somersault · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Sims doesn't count

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Big Deal... by Cruciform · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Big deal. I was molested at age 5. Does that count in your little pissing contest?

    8. Re:Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly.. That's the point of the post. Most guys would give you a high five if you said something like that, but it was pretty traumatic for me.

      I'm 38 now, went through therapy for 5 years, blew boatloads of cash on women and shit I can't remember. Took me through college to get over the idea that sex was some horrible, dirty thing.

      I'm lucky though. Got a beautiful kid, beautiful wife (ex-model, still looks it), a decent bank account (still got to work, but don't think much about things like Recession).

      It's all fucking relative. My best buddy is probably worth $20M but would stick a knife in my back if he'd make a buck off it. I think he hangs around me because it makes him feel charitable, so he knows what the "tough life" is. Which is pretty freaking hilarious since I grew up soft, with parents who struggled just to make sure I always had enough to eat, place to stay.

      Mod this as a troll, I don't care, but it's tough getting over some 40yr old woman making your 14 year old penis bleed because you're scared of the woman and just can't make your equipment work.

    9. Re:Big Deal... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but people with astrophysics degrees haven't been laid by dirty old men, so it all balances out.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    10. Re:Big Deal... by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      "my friend's mother gave me a blowjob."

      Wow. She sounds like a creep.

    11. Re:Big Deal... by corbettw · · Score: 1

      How old will you be when you finally sign up for a Slashdot account?

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    12. Re:Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's magically _her_ fault that _you_ couldn't perform?!

      Granted, fine, if she's ugly then you had a reason _not_ to perform. But come on!

    13. Re:Big Deal... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      You should have left the church already and sued the pastor who did this to you.

    14. Re:Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got laid at the age of 4 and got a college degree by age 14. Beat that!

    15. Re:Big Deal... by grimborg · · Score: 1

      Big deal. I was molested at age 5. Does that count in your little pissing contest?

      Hmm it depends. Did you like it?

    16. Re:Big Deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky bastard, I didn't get molested until I was 10!

    17. Re:Big Deal... by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      So THAT'S why they say 'and sheep are nervous'...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    18. Re:Big Deal... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      My best buddy is probably worth $20M but would stick a knife in my back if he'd make a buck off it.

      Sounds to me like you're pretty fucking stupid (or avaricious) keeping such a dangerous cat around.

    19. Re:Big Deal... by alexo · · Score: 1

      My best buddy is probably worth $20M but would stick a knife in my back if he'd make a buck off it.

      You have strange criteria for choosing friends.

  13. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Hubbell · · Score: 1

    Genius is 130+, retarded is -70, and average is 100.

  14. Selection unfairness. by XcepticZP · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Brilliant little kid, I must say. And I am very glad that he is given the recognition he deserves.

    However, I'd like to point out that every time we see an extraordinary case like his, there are countless other examples that are half way there. What I mean is that why do only the "super-genius" kids get to advance faster in schools and colleges? What about those people that are smart and dedicated enough to pass through say high-school in 1-2 years, rather than the usual 5-6. Instead these people are forced to stay 5-6 years doing highschool. Same thing with college.

    Not everyone is meant to fit into the average of society. That is why we allow people to repeat grade levels and university subjects. So why not go the other way and allow above average students, or students with above average dedication to finish faster. Sounds like a double standard to me.

    1. Re:Selection unfairness. by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      Instead these people are forced to stay 5-6 years doing highschool.

      I hope you don't just mean grades 9-12....

    2. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Welcome to "no child left behind". The policy that ensures that the smartest students are held back to the level of the dumbest.

    3. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure which kind of high school you went to exactly, but where I come from most people tend to finish it in 4 years...

    4. Re:Selection unfairness. by internerdj · · Score: 1

      I've got to say that in High School nothing pissed me off more than finding one of my peers had found a way to advance more rapidly than the rest of the class, and I didn't even know the opportunity existed until someone had won it. I took every academic opportunity that I had access to and there were a handful of people who got more because they had a special relationship with the administration. I probably could have done community college at 6th grade, most definitely by the time I hit high-school. I think there are a lot of people out there that could handle that; the problem is if the smart kids go off to magnet schools or college before high school then you screw up the whole test scores metric.

    5. Re:Selection unfairness. by Gerafix · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding me? I wish I could have spent *more* time in high school. At least that way I might have stood a chance of getting laid sooner. All this focus on academic achievement really diminishes the attention we should be paying to our sexual organs when we are young and able to do so. I can calculate Feynman diagrams but I can't get some tail? What's wrong with the world today? Somebody please think of the children.

    6. Re:Selection unfairness. by internerdj · · Score: 1

      You mean grades 9-12 didn't last 5-6 years? It sure felt like it... Actually in the absence of a middle school, a "high school" may house students from 7-12th despite the 7th and 8th graders not actually being called high schoolers...

    7. Re:Selection unfairness. by profplump · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to defend NCLB, but was there some previous policy that did not hold back the smartest students? I seem to recall that being the status quo long before NCLB.

    8. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Utter bullshit. NCLB is a failure but teachers have been required to teach to the "lowest common denominator" for a LONG time. At the very least, since the 1970's. (Wasn't in school before that.) NCLB was, in fact, supposed to fix this problem. While the teacher's unions (though NOT the teachers) worked their darnedest to make sure that any good that could come of NCLB has failed, it did not cause the problem you mention.

      You do a disservice to fixing the US education system by blaming a failed solution to an existing problem as the source of the problem.

    9. Re:Selection unfairness. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Welcome to "no child left behind". The policy that ensures that the smartest students are held back to the level of the dumbest.

      That's what happens when you get an organization the size of the U.S. federal government involved in something that should be handled at the local level.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    10. Re:Selection unfairness. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Why not? because they cant milk more money out of you.

      the Education system has NEVER been about education. it's all about making money.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    11. Re:Selection unfairness. by somersault · · Score: 1

      In the UK you can leave high school after 4 years if you wish, but you won't have the qualifications you require to get into University. That takes 5 years, and some people stay on for 6. Depending on what you studied in 5th and 6th year you can sometimes skip your first year at Uni.

      I like the idea a lot of being able to go at your own pace, I'm sure I could have trimmed at least 3 years off of my education from ages 4 to 16 - probably a lot more , especially where maths and science were concerned. With the ubiquity of computers these days we could easily have kids learning at their own pace. If they gave out experience points, levels and silly outfits for study time and passing tests, then you'd probably have a lot of kids ready for University before they hit their teens :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Selection unfairness. by diskofish · · Score: 1

      I found high school to be largely a waste of time. I skipped school as much as possible, and did the bare minimum. For the most part, material was poorly presented by the teachers and seemed irrelevant. I think a lot of kids could probably struggle through at least some college courses and many could excel. I actually found some courses much easier than ones I had taken in highschool. AP courses for example, you not only had to learn the material but take a standardized test. I think when it comes to higher education, it's about discipline. I think kids are generally smarter than we give them credit for.

      At 11, the only thing I was disciplined about was making new ANSI screens for my BBS and making sure I had the latest pirated game available for download.

    13. Re:Selection unfairness. by Rycross · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fundamentally, the federal government's efforts in "fixing" our schools is trying to make a complicated problem simple. The blunt truth is that there is no one problem that our schools share. In some areas its bad teachers, and in other areas its schools filled with lazy, unmotivated kids. In other areas, its because the parents do not have the time or inclination to be involved with their childrens' schooling (either because they are bad parents, or because they have to work double-shifts just to put food on the table).

      This is why handling education at a federal level is a fundamentally bad idea. It assumes that there is some generic solution that can be applied to fix all schools at once. In reality, problems must be identified at a school-by-school basis, which leaves education best suited to local communities.

    14. Re:Selection unfairness. by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Where I'm from, and we follow the English system, you have primary school, secondary(high school) school, and then college, or oddly enough tertiary education. Primary lasts 7 years, and secondary lasts either 5 or 6.

      I'm not too sure how the American system is in terms of years, but I reckon it's similar.

    15. Re:Selection unfairness. by internerdj · · Score: 1

      Glad you live in one of the top states on the education totem poll. My state is incredibly inept at managing the power it has over education already with federal oversight, and even as a practicing Christian I would dread to see what they would be taught in "science" class.

    16. Re:Selection unfairness. by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      Not everyone enjoyed high school from a social perspective. I sure didn't enjoy it as much as I saw others enjoying it. But when I think about it, I actually miss those days. Social things were so much simpler. Not to to mention the oversimplified courting rituals.

    17. Re:Selection unfairness. by adonoman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The worst part is, is that even for the middle-of-the-road kids, the thinking techniques and content that they teach arent' that tough. Even first-year university-level calculus can be taught one-on-one in a week to an average person by a competent tutor. But, by teaching to the bottom of the pack, the teachers make everything seem like it should be much harder than it is, so the students spend huge amounts of time trying to memorise lists of rules that apply to very specific situations, instead of developing an intuitive understanding of how a system works. It's like the coder who write this:


      switch (var)
      {
            case 0:
                  return 0;
            case 1:
                  return 1;
            case 2:
                  return 2;

            \\ ...

            case 1522145:
                  return 1522145;
            case 1522146:
                  return 1522146;
            default:
                  ASSERT(false); // If this happens, add more numbers to the switch.
      }


      instead of


      return var;

      Anyone can understand what the second example does just by looking at it. On the other hand, looking at the first example, you have to check every single case to make sure there isn't an exception hidden in there. Nearly all of my teachers taught in the first manner. They don't explain that there is a relationship between resitance, voltage and current, they give you three separate sitations: you have resistance and voltage; you have voltage and current; and you have current and resistance. Then they teach you three formulae to solve each situation. And they'll devote an entire class to examples for each of the three. And everyone is sitting there assuming they must be missing something because the professor spent 3 hours try to teach that V = IR, and hasn't even touched on the theory and the reasons why the relation holds.

    18. Re:Selection unfairness. by snl2587 · · Score: 1

      It really depends on the region of the U.S., but where I'm from it goes like this:

      • Elementary: K-5
      • Middle: 6-8
      • High: 9-12

      And then college if one is so inclined. School is mandatory from K-12 and grades are skipped only in unusual circumstances with the exception of 11-12, where some students may dual-enroll in community college and graduate with an AA at the same time as their high school diploma.

    19. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NEA and Dems were doing that long before NCLB came around.. Afterall, it's politically correct that everyone is "equal", right? So let's go for the lowest common denominator, else some poor kid might have "self-esteem" issues, God forbid. My wife was a teacher in the '90s and it made her sick to her stomach.

    20. Re:Selection unfairness. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      If there is something wrong with your local school, get off your butt and fix it. That may involve a lot of work on your part and many years, but getting the state and federal governments involved makes it harder to fix what ever is wrong with a local school, not easier.
      The problem in this country is that we want to point out some problem and then find some "authority" to fix it for us, while we go on about our daily lives and ignore the problem.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    21. Re:Selection unfairness. by sckeener · · Score: 2, Interesting

      we allow people to repeat grade levels and university subjects. So why not go the other way and allow above average students, or students with above average dedication to finish faster.

      agreed. Every time that was offered to me in grade school, I advanced much faster working at my own pace rather than that of the slowest average person in my class.

      I'm not good at English, but I'm great at math. The school system didn't realize that about me until they went to a method to teach math for 4th and 5th grade students to work at their own pace. I zoomed and suddenly other options in education opened up (my zooming opened up all the advanced courses then...)

      In my 6th grade social studies class, they posted the entire years assignments at the beginning of the year. I finished it by November. I was left doing special projects for the teacher for the rest of the year or studying on my own (which I preferred.) Though I learned a lot on my own during that extra time, I think it could have been better spent, but they didn't have anything in place for students like me who excelled in certain topics (math and history - which probably describes why I loved D&D which has losts of math and history)

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    22. Re:Selection unfairness. by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      that's a little unclever. You can't "fix" a county full of Southern Baptists wanting to teach Creation in science class or convince them that yes reading IS important no matter how "good they got by" without it, no matter how determined you are, short of killing them all and starting over. On a certain level there absolutely does need to be overarching mandate to what gets taught and how, otherwise certain parts of the country, small towns in particular will go straight back to the dark ages.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    23. Re:Selection unfairness. by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      As someone who knocked-out High School in 2 years and was forced to sit the whole 4 years for my Bachelor's, I agree with you 100%.

      --
      The game.
    24. Re:Selection unfairness. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      that's a little unclever. You can't "fix" a county full of Southern Baptists wanting to teach Creation in science class or convince them that yes reading IS important no matter how "good they got by" without it, no matter how determined you are, short of killing them all and starting over. On a certain level there absolutely does need to be overarching mandate to what gets taught and how, otherwise certain parts of the country, small towns in particular will go straight back to the dark ages.

      If you can't fix the problem with the schools at the local level, you can't fix them, end of story. Of course you make this comment about small towns going "straight back to the dark ages", when in fact it is the schools in big cities that are the one's that are the worst.
      You don't "fix" a county full of whatever, you fix the school. Don't try and get the schools to indoctrinate the kids to believe evolution. Let the kids believe whatever they want, just make sure they understand what the theory of evolution is and how it applies to the science of biology.
      If you know how to frame your arguments and are persistent, you can get things to change.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    25. Re:Selection unfairness. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      [quote]Brilliant little kid, I must say. And I am very glad that he is given the recognition he deserves.[/quote]

      The kid is only 11.

      I'm not saying he isn't smart, particularly gifted, or even a genius. But at 11, a child is still very, very impressionable. Something like "intelligence" or "genius" can be easily "faked" through any number of other abilities (alone or in combination) such as:

      photographic memory

      very good at memorization

      very impressionable

      In short, this kid could simply be repeating what he's being told and/or what he's reading. It is a community college, after all: they tend to coddle their students, repeat things, and cover everything which will be on the exam in class. If he's an auditory savant of some sort (ie remembers everything he hears), as would be suggested by parent-parrot statements like "I like to study just because knowledge goes to wisdom and only by wisdom can we help the world"), then I'd say there's a good chance he just remembers stuff.

      This is true particularly when you've got parents who push your potential and try to also instill their worldview on you. I've known a couple people who are absolutely incredible when it comes to remembering things - but they're only so-so on the logic and thought side of things. Vice versa also applies (smart, can't remember shit) and various combinations thereof.

      Sure, they're smart. Genius? No, probably not. Geniuses are, in my experience, somewhat socially dysfunctional. I know a girl who could (so she claimed) read by age 2 or so from the dictionary, can speak 4 languages, and scored a mere 27 (IIRC) on the ACT college entrance exam. Her brother, on the other hand, comes across as a bumbling simpleton, but aced the exam. Socially and intellectually, I suspect she could've gotten a college degree at 11 from a community college. He probably couldn't, simply on the personal-relation side of things.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    26. Re:Selection unfairness. by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Some parts of education are better deal with at the local level, true, but doing everything at the local level just leads to an even higher politization.

      In pretty much any other Western country, you'll see that Curriculum guidelines are given all the way from the national government. Having a state decide what can be covered in a biology class makes as much sense as a school board trying to redefine gravity. Let the local governments deal with their local problems, but don't just get rid of every federal guideline in the name of federalism. Making every single decision locally can be very inefficient.

    27. Re:Selection unfairness. by Sephollyon · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what it was, I've never bothered to look it up, but I remember in second grade that a new law or piece of legislation was passed that changed school dramatically. The thing I noticed the most was that the spelling tests got dramatically easier. I remember kids(as well as myself) complaining that the words we were supposed to be studying had already been gone over or were far too easy. I also remember our teacher becoming very frustrated with the district and she retired a couple years later.

      At the time I was being sent to do science class with a fifth grade class and I was in love with school. After whatever legislation that was passed I could no longer attend higher classes and was stuck in my second grade class. Whatever it was instituted very detrimental changes to the curriculum, and I cared less and less about school after that.

      This was circa 1994, in Douglas County, CO.

    28. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. My parents were told I could skip ahead 4 grades, but that it would be a disaster to my social development - so I didn't. That was in 1978.

    29. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think there's a school in the United States that isn't filled with lazy, unmotivated kids. While your idea about different schools having different problems is definitely true, as is your assessment that steps to fix an individual school is best left to the communities, there is one problem with what you are implying. While each school has its own challenge, the tool to fix them is pretty much universal: FUNDING. Communities only have limited means to raise said funding, and in the case of impoverished districts, this means that they can never create the minds needed to develop those communities. The Problem with "No child left behind" is twofold. it attempted to asses low-performing schools, but instead of nurturing those schools so they could perform better it would basically threaten those schools. It provided no additional funding, and it created a new standardized test that teachers taught to because their job depended on it. In order to truly fix our schools, we DO need federal involvement. We need to provide money for under preforming schools, and we need to provide research for communities to reshape their school district. We need to identify what works, and what doesn't. We need to create an academic culture that recognizes and promotes intelligence, and extend that to the "real world" as it were.

    30. Re:Selection unfairness. by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      Other than starting in "Kindergarten" and ending in "12th grade" there is no "American System." Certain things are common to most states, but there is no national system of education. That is why pathetic things like the SAT test exist, so that the universities know what they are getting at.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    31. Re:Selection unfairness. by Rycross · · Score: 1

      I wish I could find the study (a million copies of "The 25/100 worst-performing schools" are cluttering up Google results), but researchers found that poorly performing schools, on average, received more funding per student than well-performing schools. So, its not all that clear to me that funding is the problem in all cases.

    32. Re:Selection unfairness. by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      I never understood how this argument makes any sense. Its not like universities are traded on the stock market or that investors expect a return and so students get shafted in some respects. It may be true that they WANT money so they are better funded, but to say that they are "making" money is ridiculous.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    33. Re:Selection unfairness. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Not to defend NCLB, but was there some previous policy that did not hold back the smartest students?

      Yes. There were gifted programs. However, with NCLB, costs increased. It is illegal to cut programs for the special ed, so that left gifted programs to get cut. So NCLB directly hurt gifted programs by stealing funding. Also, NCLB lowered the expectations of the class. With more tests and more penalties if the lowest students didn't meet standards, more in-class time is spent on the bottom 20%. This harms the attention the exceptional students receive. Not directly holding them back like the canceling of advanced classes, but still holding them back none the less.

      So yes, there isn't some "we must hold everyone back" clause. There is just that predictable and realized effect. NCLB was purposeful sabotage. Bush harmed millions of children for the sole goal of weakening public schools in preparation of vouchers.

      I seem to recall that being the status quo long before NCLB.


      Now there are incentives to ignore the exceptional. Before it was just apathy, now it's institutionalized.

    34. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, and it is very bad, and dangerous,

      Thus we teach all but the brightest and __MOST__DETERMINED__ that Bullshit is better than brains and the system is broken. I got this in the US in 1951 when the system was already so broken that it did not know what to do with bright kids.

      No, boring the ass off them for the next 15 years is not the answer. When I was 8 a helpful young Indian maths grad student taught me the beginnings of algebra and in about a week he had taught me all the algebra and calculus I would need before I started to learn real mathematics, how and why, it isn't hard and dosn't take long if no-one is making a fuss. Now I understood simple Mathematics science was easy, hint, its only hard if you try to do it without mathematics for the innumerate.

      Fortunately I did High School and First Degree in the UK which was yet to be affected by this crap, but teacher colleagues tell me is now at least as bad.

      If I were a school student in the US today I would devote 90% of my energy to creating a revolution to empower bright-kids and would seek to rely on the Second Ammendment to ensure the PC did not triumph

    35. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK we do school until we're 16 at which point we do our GCSEs, at 16 - 18 we do A-Levels, then we go to University.

      I dropped out of my A-Levels and went straight into a software engineering job at 16 simply because I found my A-Levels dull, they were just regurgitating stuff I already knew inside out, I would much rather have been able to go straight to university where I could actually learn stuff. No university would take me without A-Levels though yet it would've only taken a 15 minute interview from a comp. sci. professor to see that I was in fact ready.

      I did go back and do a degree in the end although at this point I'd been working in software engineering and continuing to learn off my own back in my own time and really I found a computing degree rather easy - I'd rather have gone straight in to do a Masters degree. In the end I switched to a primarily maths degree and found it much more of a challenge because it wasn't a subject I was as strong in.

      I found my own way regardless and have done okay for myself but I truly do think the system failed me. But even at GCSE level I failed miserably at French and got an E, but to do a language was mandatory, the problem is I had no care or interest for learning a language at that age so I just didn't bother with it. There is certainly a case to be made that we should broaden kids horizons by teaching them a wide range of subjects but it should not be be allowed to hold them back in subjects they do well at.

      I think there's also a bias to only finding geniuses in certain subjects too however, when I look back now at code I wrote when I was younger I believe I could've been to computing and software engineering what this kid is to physics, but the problem was no one saw a kid being good as computing as something unique - they put me in with all the other kids that were seen as "computer wizz kids" just because we were all tapping away at a keyboard, the differences is they were typing e-mails to each other and I was writing a distributed, concurrent application in C++ at the time. It took until I was 16, and hence legally old enough to leave schooling and work full time for my skills to be recognised by business. I do feel then from my experience that our academic system is full of flaws, apart from the fact most exams as they're set are stupid because they only really test crystalised and not fluid knowledge for the most part there are as I say limitations to the path your expected to follow in education that hold kids who are good at their preferred subject back. I think it's a sad testament to our education system that it took industry to pick me up and the education system completely missed me.

      I know this post may sound big headed, but I'm trying to be as honest as possible about my experience. I'd be lying if I didn't say I knew at a young age I was good - as I say, when most the class were first playing with e-mail I was busy writing some pretty complex apps.
      Despite that I do not think I'm terribly unique or uncommon in my abilities I think there are many more like me across the country, I think a large portion of drop outs are probably actually extremely bright kids who have simply been failed by the system and not given opportunity to learn what they want to learn, they've just been forced to learn whatever the government thinks they should learn. It probably says something that some of the worlds biggest successes (i.e. Bill Gates) were themselves drop outs.

    36. Re:Selection unfairness. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      When the teacher's union is larger than the entire local city population, the local government can't do shit.

    37. Re:Selection unfairness. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      It should be illegal for state employees to unionize because it's effectively placing the interests of union members above that of society writ large. Thoughts?

    38. Re:Selection unfairness. by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The local teacher's union can't be larger than the local population. If the state and federal government weren't involved, the rest of the union wouldn't matter.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    39. Re:Selection unfairness. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Is this some new[1] scheme? Normally you need A levels to get into University, which you take in the 6th year (you'd be 18 years old, or nearly).

      Anyone going at a younger age would be a very rare exception.

      Also I've never heard of anyone being allowed to skip the first year based on school subjects. You might get a "bye" on one or two modules.

      [1] as in, in the last 20 years since I went through it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    40. Re:Selection unfairness. by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'm in Scotland, they're called Highers here not A levels. Yes there were some courses I wouldn't have had to do at all in 1st year if I'd taken appropriate highers, but I think it's possible to skip the first year altogether if you take enough of them. I had to do this lame little IT course just because I didn't take Higher IT, which was just basically how to use Office and other such bullshit.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    41. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain for the benefit of us in the US what the difference between Scotland and the UK is.

    42. Re:Selection unfairness. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Scotland is part of the UK in a similar fashion to California or any other state being part of the US, for example. The UK is comprised of Scotland, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.

      Perhaps someone else could explain for the benefit of you guys in the US how to use google though.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    43. Re:Selection unfairness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scotland is a subset of UK? So what you said originally is false. It's only in *part of the UK* that the entry exemptions apply.

      Since your an expert on google, perhaps you could search for set theory.

    44. Re:Selection unfairness. by somersault · · Score: 1

      What did I say that was false? All UK school curriculum are basically equivalent, but with different names for the qualifications. I don't need google to teach me what I already know from school and friends who lived in England and Northern Ireland.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    45. Re:Selection unfairness. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      All UK school curriculum are basically equivalent, but with different names for the qualifications.

      No. Highers[1] are not equivalent to A levels. They're equivalent to AS levels. Good luck getting into an English university with them.

      As to the skipping a year, that's because Scottish university courses are often four rather than three years. It's the same except you do one of the years in a different place.

      [1] as distinct from "even highers", "stratospherics", or whatever they dream up next.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    46. Re:Selection unfairness. by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you want to be precise then A levels are somewhere between Higher and Advanced Higher.. it's all roughly the same though, with maybe a year's difference depending on where you are. One place I moved to in Scotland was on a little island and they actually put me a year ahead for the 4 months that I was there because their primary school curriculum was easier than the one I'd been doing, so it can depend as much on the regional curriculum or school itself as on the country. If we'd stayed there then I may have been at University by 16 rather than 17..

      --
      which is totally what she said
  15. Big deal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Tag this story communitycollege.

  16. Great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Great, more kids that are smarter than I am.

  17. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's just unlikely they will "fit in" in most college social organizations

    Speaking as someone who was in the same situation, but kept in regular school, it's just as unlikely that he'll "fit in" in the regular school system.

    We all need to be with our social peers.

    And what if you don't have any social peers? In regular school, at best he'll be ostracized and bored. At worst he'll be bullied and bored.

  18. Community college? by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hum, being so precocious, he is probably very intelligent. Why then go to community college? I am not entirely familiar with US education system, but I was under the impression that these places were considered much less challenging.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Community college? by xenolion · · Score: 1

      Im going to guess due to his age the school system thought it would be better for him to go to a community college cause it may be somewhat easier then move up to a larger school. Again this is all a guess.

    2. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...because most Community Colleges cater to the 11 year old mind ;-)

    3. Re:Community college? by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Real universities don't want to admit students of his age in the vast majority of cases. It's just plain ageism.

    4. Re:Community college? by rob1980 · · Score: 4, Informative

      They are much less selective than 4-year schools and the programs tend to be more vocational in nature.

      That said, taking some things like composition or entry-level mathematics tends to be the same regardless of whether you take it at a community college for $40/hour or at a university for $200/hour. Some of the stuff the kid took won't be worth anything anywhere, but he'll have a good chunk of his general education requirements knocked out at whatever university he gets into.

    5. Re:Community college? by diskofish · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would say the difficult of a two year school compares to the difficultly of the first two years of a four year school. I went to a respected private school and found the quality of some classes to be below that of classes at community colleges and state run schools. It really depends a lot on the teacher and the curriculum in the course.

    6. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      A number of universities here in the UK (Oxford, a few others), have said that they're going to stop admitting young students. It's not ageism, any more than the fact that kids can't buy alcohol or drive is ageism. There's a lot of reasons why you might not want an 11-year old spending all their time with 20-year olds, and I'm guessing it puts a lot of pressure on various authorities who now have to comply with various regulations about working with minors.

      I'm not a genius, but I was a bright kid, and I know how much it can suck when your school work doesn't stretch your abilities, but I don't think sending such kids off to university is a real fix - I think there needs to be more resources in schools for challenging the most talented.

    7. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well lets keep in mind that he is 11 years old, most likely needs to be transported by his parents to school, and is not ready for life away from home at a large university. A local community college was surely the easiest route for higher education for him. Also, community colleges probably waived a lot of the typical entrance requirements - had he lived closer to a more elite school, would they even have accepted him?

    8. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could be financial. community college tuition is pretty low, idk how many full paid scholarships there are for 10 year olds, none i've read about. don't forget a lot of smart people opt to go to CC's because class sizes are -much- smaller, least where i am in tampa. For the child the transition to a real university (which someone of that caliber of intelliegence is probably going to be at 6+ years) would be easier as well perhaps.

    9. Re:Community college? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      Kai Cavalin has graduated from East Los Angeles Community College

      I'm sure he's more brilliant than I'll ever to close to, but wouldn't it have made sense to go to a real university if he's that smart?

      If this is the start of a long academic career, then it's probably best to start cheap. A community college is probably still a big step up from the classes he'd have been taking otherwise.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    10. Re:Community college? by Mes · · Score: 1

      You would send your 11yrold away to college?

      The community college was was probably within driving distance which makes it about the same as going to high school. The child hasnt even started puberty yet.

    11. Re:Community college? by atamido · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Community college is much easier to transition into than full university. Sending a 9 year old to full university is a good way to have someone crack under pressure. At the community college the classes are probably smaller, the teachers can take more time to evaluate the students, and the parents can probably be more involved.

    12. Re:Community college? by MarkvW · · Score: 1

      I'd bet that the choice of community college was mainly driven by convenience.

    13. Re:Community college? by KefabiMe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I went to a California community college. This fall I'm transferring to the math program at Berkeley. There are a lot of reasons to go to a community college, and California actually has an excellent college and university system! (K-12 leaves a lot to be desired.)

      Community colleges are cheaper. There are a lot of people who work full time and go to school full time just to pay for tuition.

      Community colleges are local. Moving to a new location can be an enormous hassle. If they can get general ed requirements out of the way and stay with family, why not?

      Perhaps best of all, the community colleges allow ANYONE at ANY AGE to get a higher education. The entire community college system has worked with the entire university system in California to make it really easy to transfer. General education requirements for ANY California univeristy can be completed at ANY community college. (Check out Assist.org & IGETC.)

      I cannot stress this last point enough! I am a high school drop out. Yes, that's right. I took a test to get my high school diploma at the age of 19. However, that was almost a decade ago. I've learned a lot since then. For example, I've learned that school is *easy as shit* compared to working on the deck of a fishing boat or 60 hours a week at a crappy desk job. The California community college system has allowed me to go back to school and has given me the opportunity to transfer to the mathematics program at Berkeley. I feel that in most other states and countries I would've been screwed for mistakes I made as a teenager. I am really thankful that California has allowed me to try again for a degree, even if it's a decade late!

    14. Re:Community college? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      He probably just went to the college closest to home. I know a kid who triple majored at a nearby 4-year libral arts college at the age of 16. He easily could have gone to a top university instead, but he kept busy close to home. Now he's doing graduate studies at University of Chicago. If you go to graduate school it doesn't really matter what you did for undergrad, so a cheap and close to home community college is a perfect way to start.

    15. Re:Community college? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Depends how wealthy the family is...

      Much better to do undergrad at the less prestigious institution and then do your masters/phd/whatever at the top-tier one than the other way round.

    16. Re:Community college? by east+coast · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They are much less selective than 4-year schools and the programs tend to be more vocational in nature.

      They only appear to be more vocational in nature because that's the general impression of associates degrees. Anyone not aspiring to a bachelor's degree or higher would be an idiot for going anyplace other than a community college. I went to a community college but my professors normally taught at universities. I felt that community college was second rate too until I really looked around. I had a professor from CMU who told us that the course he was presenting was the same as he would present for one of his Carnegie Mellon classes. My Astronomy 101 professor was an actual professional astronomer and not just some academia with a big head. My sociology teacher had a doctorate from Yale, also studied in Berlin and Moscow and taught at Pitt. I look back now and see that there was a lot of quality education that went on and any "dumbing down" that was done was more so from the aspect of the students than the teaching staff. As much as college is a way to filter out the dead weight it's no different than public schools in that you get out of it what you put into it.

      That said, taking some things like composition or entry-level mathematics tends to be the same regardless of whether you take it at a community college for $40/hour or at a university for $200/hour.

      You're right, the current numbers from my CC (CCAC) to PSU was roughly 95 dollars a credit from CCAC to nearly 500 USD a credit at Penn State. These numbers are for a part time student. As a full timer YMMV.

      Some of the stuff the kid took won't be worth anything anywhere, but he'll have a good chunk of his general education requirements knocked out at whatever university he gets into.

      If this is true than it's his own fault. PSU gladly sent me their transfer sheet for CCAC. All in all I think I took 7 credits that didn't transfer and 4 of those were for a sub-100 course I took just to get back into the swing of things after not having been in a classroom for over a decade. A student at CCAC could take all the courses they need to at 1/5th the price and put themselves in the same arena as a second semester junior at Penn State. I don't think that's a bad step to take for a student unless they have grants and scholarships that require that they be enrolled at a university level institution.

      Sorry if parts of this sounded like a rant. I just feel that students shouldn't downplay a community college if they don't have what it takes financially to get into a big school. Maybe I went to an extraordinary community college but my experience is that with a little research and planning a student can get a really great step towards a better education at a discount price and the vast majority of it should transfer. I was in a situation where I simply couldn't afford even the second rate universities when I graduated high school and I let that hold me back because I had a bad taste in my mouth when someone mentioned community college. Like I said, I got out of it what I put into it and I'm grateful that it was there.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    17. Re:Community college? by chill · · Score: 1

      That explains why he is actually looking at the BOOK in this picture. I'd ace college too, if I could ignore those two.

      http://www.daylife.com/photo/076m3k4g056Fe

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    18. Re:Community college? by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 1

      Community colleges often have open admission policies (meaning you just pick your major, take classes, and get a degree... no fancy entry exams or requirements, etc.). I took a ``college'' (eh!) level class that way when I was a sophomore in high school that way.

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

    19. Re:Community college? by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      From my observation, community colleges are easier than public high schools. My father taught at a community college - engineering mathematics - for two semesters and got asked to resign because he was making it too difficult. He shared the textbook with me at the time (I was in 7th or 8th grade, but home schooled) and it was stuff I'd already covered (or could figure out w/o too much effort).

      I attended three different colleges myself - a private college, a state school, and a private university (which might be considered a community college by some). In terms of difficulty, the private college was the most intense, and the private uni was the least. Much of the private uni work was, in my assessment, high school equivalence for "non-traditional" students (thankfully I didn't take any of that and opted for the more difficult courses) and ended up tutoring for mathematics/English/CS. On a whole, the private university I attended was significantly more challenging than the community college my father taught at, however.

      Really, it depends on the school, I think. And it seems likely that whatever degree this kid got, it's being significantly hyped by the media, the school, and/or his parents. As another poster mentioned, a degree in astrophysics (or even physics) isn't even offered by the school.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    20. Re:Community college? by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      Another possible factor is that the university may have been far from his house. Going to the community college at least would let him have two more years of normal home life. Especially, as you said, when much of the classwork is the same. Also, there are some community colleges which have programs designed to funnel students into a program at a university, and have classes which meet the same standards.

    21. Re:Community college? by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Hum, being so precocious, he is probably very intelligent. Why then go to community college?

      Some community colleges are much better at lower-division undergraduate education (in certain fields, which vary by college), than many universities, whose priorities for faculty are generally, in descending order of importance, research, graduate education, upper division undergraduate education, and lower division undergraduate education.

      Also, community colleges are vastly less expensive, and (at least public ones in California) and four-year universities often will not even consider applicants under a certain age regardless of qualifications (I personally know of someone who was forced to delay entry into a prestigious southern California university for a year due to age alone.)

    22. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As someone who has a master's degree in astronomy (nobody actually calls the degree astrophysics, to my knowledge) and currently teaches at a community college, I have to say this is probably way overhyped. Community colleges issue Associates' degrees, that don't generally even HAVE a major specified.

      So he took all the physics classes. Big deal. Any decent bachelor's degree program is going to make him retake half that stuff to fit into their sequence anyway. And remember, the ENTRY level degree in this field is a PhD.

      It's impressive he's gotten as far as he as but disingenuous in the extreme to say he has a degree in astrophysics and imply that this is somehow comperable to someone who's just received a PhD, or even a Bachelor's.

    23. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hum, being so precocious, he is probably very intelligent. Why then go to community college? I am not entirely familiar with US education system, but I was under the impression that these places were considered much less challenging.

      Well they aren't challenging at all.

      The only thing this proves is they're so easy that a 11yo kid can do it.

    24. Re:Community college? by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Not to be a wet blanket, but I think you missed a boatload of positive, life-changing experiences by not spending a year or two living in on-campus housing. It fundamentally changed who I was for the better. There's nothing like living in close quarters with 300 intellectually curious people (honors dorm person here) and having so little homework the first year (because it's a lighter load than you self-imposed in high school) that you can catch people at 3am, grab a burger, and debate the merits of invading Iraq the day it's happening, discussing the orthography of simplified and traditional hanzi, and Chopin's influence on modern rock (OK, I'm lying, we weren't cool enough to talk about rock 'n' roll). Living on campus made me a better person by far despite *obligatory reference to bad food*.

    25. Re:Community college? by KefabiMe · · Score: 1

      As a transfer student at Berkeley I am guaranteed student housing for one year. In fact, they even have a dormitory set aside specifically for transfer students. I applied for housing at this dorm. Freshmen are guaranteed housing for two years.

    26. Re:Community college? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Virginia at least, public universities are required to waive all general education requirements if you obtain a two-year degree prior to enrolling in a bachelor's degree program. So it's quite possible all the classes he took were cheap and useful.

    27. Re:Community college? by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Hmm, good point.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  19. So what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    If I was too young to buy booze and be interested in chicks I probably could have got an A+ too. Show off....

    1. Re:So what by miggyb · · Score: 1

      "A 2004 survey by Toronto magazine NOW was answered by an unspecified number of thousands. The results show that an overwhelming majority of the males (81%) began masturbating between the ages of 10 and 15." [Source]

      I'll let everyone make their own assumptions.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
  20. Not really a good idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Ask anyone who has done something like this (myself included, but not to that extreme), and, 5-10 years down the line, they'll tell you that their parents should never have had them do it. School isn't entirely there to learn what's in the classes, it's also training you socially. Anything that desynchronizes you from the social skills you're supposed to be learning at any given age is a long run detriment, because social skills build just like math and science. And the 'real world' is a lot more dependent on social factors than most people this website wants to believe.

    1. Re:Not really a good idea. by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Social desynchronization? That explains most of your posts, AC.

  21. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Minwee · · Score: 5, Funny

    And around here you can't even get higher than 5.

  22. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought genius was defined as something like an IQ in the 98th percentile or higher.

    Not. I did a hard course at an elite university. I have no trouble believing we were all in the top 2%. But we weren't freaking geniuses.

  23. A genius? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess he was reading /. when he was 3 weeks old, just like I am doing.

    1. Re:A genius? by Kesch · · Score: 1

      Obvious troll. I've seen your account posting in discussions for years.

      --
      If this signature is witty enough, maybe somebody will like me.
  24. Community college astrophysics? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

    What kind of community college offers astrophysics? Hell, my four-year university doesn't even offer it!

  25. Aspergers by composer777 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think as we grow more aware of the extraordinary talents and focuses of those that are on the autism spectrum, we will see more of these fast-track through college kids. People with autism spectrum disorders tend to develop intellectually much faster, but when it comes to dealing with the real world, are usually way behind their peers. One big clue is that he sees no purpose to games. The unpredictability is probably overwhelming to him at this point in his development. If he has motor-coordination issues, that could also make him dislike sports.

    So, we'll come to accept people like this for who they are, give them an outlet for their early intellectual development, and also provide a society that supports the fact that emotionally they may be far behind their peers. That sounds like a much better world than one that treats ASD's as a disease or freakshow. While is IQ may qualify as genius, I hope his parents realize that he may very well be disabled in other areas of functioning, and give him the proper support. Too often, people like this feel enormous pressure, and get no support for their weaknesses.

    1. Re:Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There exists focused, driven and intelligent people that don't have a shred of aspergers in them you know. At this level of intellectual accomplishment, having a freakish intellect apart from AS is probably the main factor. I agree however that most people who monomanically studies terse subjects probably (by direct observation of my peers) have at least sub-clinical aspergers.

    2. Re:Aspergers by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Have you heard of oodaloop syndrome? It's where you get sick of every personality quirk being called a syndrome.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Aspergers by composer777 · · Score: 1

      I think the preferences of people that have it are more important (myself included). I would say it's better to have Aspergers than to wonder why you are a certain way, and have no idea how to fix your problems. In earlier times, he would have gotten a different label, "weird". And, I think it's a bit annoying to say that labels cause problems. It reminds me of people that promote "fat acceptance". Seriously, there are problems with being overweight, just as there are problems with having an autism spectrum disorder. Sticking your head in the sand and pretending that all we have to do is accept it, is wrong, in my opinion.

    4. Re:Aspergers by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

      If he has motor-coordination issues, that could also make him dislike sports.

      That's how it was for me when I was younger. (high school age and below) I couldn't compete in sports with other people my age at the time, so I focused on other things. (like computers/programming) I remember feeling socially isolated, but there was little I could do about it. Now, (10 years later) my social skills are mostly normal and I estimate that my physical abilities are about 80-85% normal, but I got to that point only after years of intensive physical training and it is still far from easy.

      --
      "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
    5. Re:Aspergers by composer777 · · Score: 1

      I believe you. But, I don't think it applies to this case.

    6. Re:Aspergers by composer777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to add to the monologue, but the reason labels can be helpful is that without it, you may never know how to apply things to yourself. If you go through life, thinking that you are normal, and applying the insights of the majority to yourself, you will be continually frustrated, as I was. Labels are useful, because they allow you to apply the proper approaches to solving your own unique challenges. I would be curious about how these kids turn out. Do they go on to stellar careers, or is early graduation a predictor of potential issues that are being covered over and compensated for? I'll admit it sounds like a stupid question, but I haven't heard it answered yet.

    7. Re:Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is graduating college at 11 a 'personality quirk'?

    8. Re:Aspergers by netsavior · · Score: 1

      a syndrome is a reoccuring set of symptoms that commonly happen together. As much as the medical community has fucked that definition, if you actually follow that definition, then yes, every single personality type is a Syndrome.

      I don't understand why you are so offended by people choosing to categorize themselves in neat little bundles. I have a 1## IQ, but I won't look you in the eye or touch mayonase, so why the hell do you care if I would like to speak to/about other people who happen to have my particular brand of functioning?

    9. Re:Aspergers by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, The Onion is supposed to be comedy. Your not supposed to take is seriously.

    10. Re:Aspergers by nathan+s · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who is "college level" at that age is autistic. I passed the ACT exams at significantly higher-than-highschool-grad levels when I was 12, and my parents only held me out of university because they were afraid that I was too young to deal with the social aspects of it (code, more or less, for worrying that I'd have my pentecostal values corrupted by the evil liberal crowd that tends to frequent such places). They had no problems, though, letting me work "part-time" in their computer store, though, of course, starting about a year later when my dad opened one.:P

      In any case, considering that one of his interests is martial arts, I think presuming that he has motor coordination issues is premature. I do agree, however, with a number of commenters who suggest that his "dislike" of video games is probably coming from adults around him who are pressuring him with notions that he shouldn't "waste" his time on such things.

      Speaking from experience, I'm a bit torn on whether or not to be happy for him that his parents haven't held him back, or concerned for him that all of the exposure will cause him to have some sort of meltdown when he is a bit older (a scenario I consider pretty likely). It's pretty hard to go from being "kid genius" to "regular guy," which is pretty much the case as soon as you exit the academic world no matter how intelligent you are, since you are accustomed to people actually paying attention to what you say based on the merits of what you are saying and the novelty factor of hearing someone so young say "intelligent things," not how much money you have or how good you look. Like age differences, intelligence differences seem to look a bit less extreme when you get older, realistically, in pretty much all shallow social encounters, and only longer-term interactions with people tend to pull out the differences unless you are dealing with someone who really is suffering from some sort of ASD.

    11. Re:Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop it. Just stop it. Autistic kids are not savants. They are not misunderstood geniuses. They have serious disabilities, and many of them will have a very hard time living even semi-independently. There is often no silver lining to a kid that freaks the fuck out at the unexpected.

    12. Re:Aspergers by avandesande · · Score: 1

      You actually believe that people thinking games are a waste of time is unusual?

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    13. Re:Aspergers by DomNF15 · · Score: 1

      You raise some interesting points, but RTFA - he likes martial arts and demonstrated some moves for the news reporter. Cross motor-coordination issues off your list. The last video game I played was COD: World at War. The AI was not really that unpredictable. This kid's teacher mentions that he can see easily through complexities, which probably includes lousy video game AI. If anything, the games are probably too easy or simplistic for him and he thus derives no pleasure from them. Without the pleasure quotient, video games aren't really very useful.

    14. Re:Aspergers by korean.ian · · Score: 1

      The kid studies martial arts. You can probably infer that he doesn't have motor-coordination issues.
      Seeing no point in games is not a big clue that he is socially inept. It means he doesn't like playing games.

    15. Re:Aspergers by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      I don't recall using the word offended. I just have a problem with labeling, diagnosing, and treating every set of personality traits. Where will this end? Will everyone who has trouble driving manual transmission take meds and go to a self-help group? Will everyone who has a fear of public speaking just commiserate with one another in online groups where they don't have to face their fears? I worry that giving kids names for their problems will label them for life, make them a source of ridicule, and turn them into that syndrome if they weren't it before. If you tell them they're fine, to do their best, they can do whatever they want in life, they'll turn out much better than if you tell them they have X syndrome and need medication for their problem. I also fear for our future, when people will feel sorry for themselves for their syndromes instead of just getting on with life. How about you develop some coping skills and get through life like the rest of us, and everyone else who ever lived?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    16. Re:Aspergers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to psychology. No one is without a syndrome.

    17. Re:Aspergers by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      Have you heard of oodaloop syndrome? It's where you get sick of every personality quirk being called a syndrome.

      Because oftentimes, it's more than just a personality quirk.

      Taking the implied example of Asperger Syndrome... We know some geeks have recently taken to self-diagnosing Asperger's and using it as an odd badge of honor, but that shouldn't undermine the seriousness of the actual condition. Asperger's can manifest itself as a devastating condition where one even has difficulty engaging in conversation [not your run-of-the-mill awkwardness--imagine someone speaking to you and you hearing their words but not having a clue what they are actually saying], difficulty living in close proximity to others [something like an 80% divorce rate has been observed for those who actually progress far enough to get married], and a significantly increased risk of developing other psychiatric conditions [anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, etc.].

      Asperger's (and other syndromes) have labels so that professionals can provide essential and targeted therapy to the underlying cause, rather than just trying to treat symptoms. You cannot treat (for example) the social awkwardness caused by Pervasive Developmental Disorders (such as Asperger's) the same way you would treat social awkwardness due to a phobia, an anxiety disorder, or childhood trauma. Each condition has a label because each has a unique cause rooted somewhere in our so-complex-they-can't-understand-themselves brains, and effective therapy occurs when each cause is dealt with separately.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    18. Re:Aspergers by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      sub-clinical aspergers

      Isn't that a fancy way of saying "not Aspergers but I still want to imply it is"?

  26. Hybrid vigor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hybrid vigor.

    You you know what that is... you'll agree with me.

  27. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will bet dollars to doughnuts he was spoonfed that corny line by his parents from the age of 2.

  28. Humility by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sorry this is off-topic but this makes me boil:

    Saying "I'm not a genius because there are 6.5 billion people" is not humility, it's selflessness. He's 11, I don't blame him, but why does the article extol this as some kind of virtue. There's nothing virtuous in making deliberately biased assessments against oneself. Humility is about objectively acknowledging fallibility. Saying "Indeed I am very precocious and I do qualify as a "child prodigy", however, you should refrain from drawing too much conclusions as many geniuses were late bloomers, etc". That's humility. Self-dissing isn't.

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
    1. Re:Humility by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      No, I agree with the kid, in that there is no such thing as true "genius" only specialization i different areas of thought. Some of us are really good at taking tests, some aren't. This kid excels at academics and is certainly a faster learning than my kid, but I'm sure there are many areas of expertise where other kids could put him to shame -- like identifying the name of all of Nintendo's characters for instance (even my 8 year old can do that!) Einstein in particular was a specialist, in that he would latch on to one thing and focus on it for days. The guy just couldn't multitask; he obviously never drove while talking on a cell phone.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Humility by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1

      There are specializations in different areas of thought, it doesn't mean that there isn't a driving underlying factor. Some people are just dumb, face it.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    3. Re:Humility by miggyb · · Score: 1

      It's also faulty reasoning. The fact that there are 6.5 billion people does not necessarily negate the fact that he is a genius.

      --
      This signature serves no purpose other than to help you see which posts were made by me.
    4. Re:Humility by rhakka · · Score: 1

      what is he saying a genius is?

      a really smart person? Or some person who is elevated beyond the rest of humanity on some sort of pedestal?

      I would wager the latter. The boy has no perspective. He is just saying he's not better than everyone else, which is what "genius" means to him... and to most people. He'd have to speak pretty precisely to explain it otherwise, but he can't, because he's 11. Just a very, very smart 11.

      In geek terms, his wisdom score is still quite low.

    5. Re:Humility by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      I always used a definition similar to wikipedia "exceptional natural capacity of intellect and creative originality." While the 11 year old is obviously academically gifted, he's yet to demonstrate the abilities that separates the Leonardo da Vinci, Albert Einstein, heck even that guy who can code really really well, from us Joe Schmoes.

  29. Um, not to rain on his parade... by DarthVain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    or to take away from an 11yr old's accomplishments...

    but is a Community College seriously giving out degrees in astrophysics?

    What other certificate course do they have? a 12 month Doctorate in Rocketry Science?

    Perhaps a 6 month Masters in Physiology with a special emphasis in Cardiology.

    You can even double major in Small Engine Repair, and this week we have specials if you combo with Massage Therapy or Hair Design.

    Anyway joking aside I am sure it was a wonderful experience for him, and I would guess the parents have a large role here in motivating him, likely by promoting the idea of education and learning as both desirable and fun. Genius or no, he is probably a smart kid who is likely mature for his years.

    1. Re:Um, not to rain on his parade... by xenolion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or his parents hover over his every move and they don't know what a joke is.

    2. Re:Um, not to rain on his parade... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      An associates degree in astrophysics is quite likely most of the state's general education requirements (6 creds of science, 6 of english, etc) plus a couple credits of astronomy and physics. In other words, nothing like what a university degree in astrophysics is (Is there even an undergrad degree in astrophysics at any accredited university?)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Um, not to rain on his parade... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do remember, though, that a large number of those trained in the medical fields (including RNs) are trained in community colleges. In one case, my former school had the second highest pass rate for the NCLEX in the state, as well as more hands-on time with patients.

      Still, some of us see the limitations and go further/elsewhere (I hope to get my DNP at some point), but there is no denying that some rather difficult topics are covered, and covered well, at the CC level.

      And even then, some of the courses being mocked are a lot more difficult than they were 20, 30 years ago. Some of them didn't even exist. Running a farm, for example, is a lot more than throwing seeds in the ground and then picking whatever grew. Business management, chemistry, some mechanical ability, technological skills, are just some of the topics needed to run a farm. My former school had specialties in dairy farming, and running a vineyard, as well as a winery. These were all degree subjects, as well as some of the construction ones. It's more than hammer nd nails i ousebuilding, you know. That's why a lot of skilled trades make the big bucks, and right away, too.

  30. Community college? by religious+freak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Kai Cavalin has graduated from East Los Angeles Community College

    I'm sure he's more brilliant than I'll ever to close to, but wouldn't it have made sense to go to a real university if he's that smart?

    Here's some Doogie Howser music, if you miss the intro, like I do (for some bizarre reason) http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x3qt3k_alternate-doogie-howser-md-tv-intro_fun

    --
    If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  31. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 2, Funny

    com'on now, dont you get 30 points automaticlly for writting your name? Maybe an extra 10 if you spell it correctly....

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
  32. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by dread · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our social peers? Allow me to laugh derisively. Ha. Ha. Ha.

    Being different in school SUCKS ASS. At least in college people are sufficiently grown up to not be assholes 100 percent of the time.

    Social peers is all to often a nice waying of saying "hang out with the half wits". There is a lot of value being put on "functioning well in groups" that for certain people mean they get to learn that they really don't want to be part of any group that they haven't selected for themselves.

    --
    I've had a wonderful time, but this wasn't it -- Groucho Marx
  33. Blaming the student for being ignorant by unlametheweak · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Daniel Judge, Cavalin's statistics professor says, "Most students think that things should be harder than they are and they put these mental blocks in front of them and they make things harder than they should be.

    I've heard it before. It's not the teacher's inability to teach, but it is the student's fault. The "Fear of Math" syndrome. People need to wake up to the reality that success is largely based on environment. If people, for example, don't have access to astro-physics books, then they are unlikely to be astrophysicists. And educational attainment has more to do with one's parents and up-bringing than with one's own inherent intellectual ability.

    I'd be more impressed if this child didn't have access to books and preferential treatment from parents and teachers and succeeded on his own to become an astrophysicist. I would also prefer to see professor Daniel Judge fired from his job for his inability to teach students.

    1. Re:Blaming the student for being ignorant by Rycross · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's usually no one cause for success in anything, whether it be intelligence, business, or whatnot, nor is there one generic cause of failure. Success requires some degree of innate ability, motivation, access to resources, and some blind luck. This kid wouldn't gotten as far as he is if he was not innately intelligent, nor would he have progressed if he was not motivated to nurture that intelligence. If he didn't have a mother who was willing to put him in community college, or a community college nearby, then he wouldn't have gotten that degree. Then there's luck: if he was born in another situation, or had some sort of accident that mentally retarded him, he would not have succeeded.

      Beware of people who like to generalize other peoples' failures into some simple reason. The world is complicated. Trying to get simple answers out of a complicated problem will leave you with a half-assed solution.

    2. Re:Blaming the student for being ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Daniel Judge, Cavalin's statistics professor says, "Most students think that things should be harder than they are and they put these mental blocks in front of them and they make things harder than they should be.

      I've heard it before. It's not the teacher's inability to teach, but it is the student's fault. ...

      ...I would also prefer to see professor Daniel Judge fired from his job for his inability to teach students.

      You vastly underestimate the difficulty of teaching statistics to the typical community college student.

    3. Re:Blaming the student for being ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No this is Exactly Ass Backward.

      Students vary hugely in ability and comprehension, and nowhere is this more clear than in Math. The Math that is taught in High School is taught from a perverted dummed down aspect which is guaranteed to destroy real ability except for the bright enough to see it as the fiasco that it is.

      The whole syllabus and presentation is crazy so why are we surprised, for example, that most kids don't realise that Goedel's theorem and the Turing halting problem are the same, or they have problems with Tensor Algebra, or Heisenberg uncertainty.

      The problem is that stupid assholes are now in the vocal majority and pontificate about social issues and how they would have problems going to university younger. The ostensible problem is that they would get caught smoking pot, or getting into a (boys|girls) pants. Let me tell you from practical experience that bright kids can think, chew gum, and fuck at the same time.

      The real need is to take an objective view of a system that purports to take 14+ years to graduate a University Batchelor, this is about 3 times too much, and if anyone survives the process rational, sane, and able to contribute to progress I would be very surprised.

      Both Einstein and Pascal made major contributions by the time they were 17, and your Teacher's Unions, Educators and the Federal Government need to explain why NO fundamental contribution has been made by a young person in more than 80 years.

    4. Re:Blaming the student for being ignorant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't believe you're serious. Idiot.

  34. Do wunderkinds produce more for society? by Synn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's really impressive to see a child prodigy, but do they go on to achieve more in life than the "average" smart crowd that goes through a more normal progression?

    1. Re:Do wunderkinds produce more for society? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      According to Malcom Gladwell in "Outliers," an IQ above 135 is not necessary to attain the greatest intellectual achievements, such as Nobel prizes. Put differently, the IQ vs achievement curve flattens at 135. A higher IQ certainly makes you smarter, but does not make you more likely to achieve or discover great things.

    2. Re:Do wunderkinds produce more for society? by edmazur · · Score: 1

      It's really impressive to see a child prodigy, but do they go on to achieve more in life than the "average" smart crowd that goes through a more normal progression?

      Malcolm Gladwell addresses this question in his book Outliers. The short answer to your question is no.

      He claims that while intelligence is important, being a child prodigy alone won't buy you success. He instead says one need be only sufficiently intelligent, but also be presented the right opportunities and have the drive to put enough hours into practicing their craft. He calls that last part the 10,000 hour rule. In all the successful people he researched/interviewed, he found they went through a period in their lives where they were "made". The Beatles performed over 1,200 times from 1960 to 1964 in Hamburg, Germany. Bill Gates spent his nights and weekends as a teenager messing around in the University of Washington computer lab, an opportunity most did not have at the time. There are other examples given in the book. On the other end of the spectrum, he presented the case of Christopher Langan, "the smartest man in America", who Gladwell says did not achieve the level of success seen in other cases because he did not have the same sort of opportunities growing up.

      I imagine you could bend the idea of traditional "success" though and see that last case in other ways.

    3. Re:Do wunderkinds produce more for society? by Optimus6128 · · Score: 1

      I constantly do the same question.

      Sometimes we see examples of great scientists who are assumed to had Asperger's. They say that many great artists were supposed to be depressive once in their life. This doesn't mean that all people on the autistic spectrum or all depressive or all obsessive compulsive will be well known geniouses at a later age. Maybe most of them will be lost in oblivion and only very few of them will excel. At least considering what the society defines as "excelling". Maybe some of them are content with their simple life and they never wished to become known or excel in science. Others might be depressed because they'd wish to but never reached that position. A lot of different cases and lot of different variables into play.

      Many wonderkids appear in news tabloids but do we know what is their life story after twenty or fifty year? I would like to look back at similar stories in newspapers from the fifties and find out what are those children doing today. This would be interesting..

      --
      The "H-Word" has died for me.
  35. AnD Then Accepts Job Offer: +1, Helpful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from China.

  36. Also in some cases by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The option to advance faster is available, but recommended against. School isn't just about mental development, it is social development as well, and that is something that seems to be harder to accelerate.

    When I was going in to first grade, my parents were offered the option to skip me ahead a grade. Whatever test it was I took showed I was far enough ahead to skip a grade. Apparently it actually showed I was far enough ahead to skip more than one, but one was all they offered. However my mom (a teacher) decided against it for social reasons.

    I'm glad she did. I'm sure I would have done fine academically, school was never all that great a challenge for me. I probably could have skipped grades a few times and graduated at a young age... but to what end? I had enough trouble with socialization, as many geeks do, that wouldn't have helped at all. Especially since one valuable lesson I learned in school is yes, maybe you are smarter than many people, but that doesn't make you better than them. Don't look down at someone just because they aren't as smart as you.

    Also, what do you do if you graduate early? University would suck. You'd be practically the only non-adult there. Just loaf around the house for a few years? That's not a good idea.

    So really I think it makes sense to keep kids in school until a regular graduation time. Instead, just offer opportunities to learn more. My school was pretty good about there. There was advanced placement classes in some subjects, plenty of extra curricular activities and so on. I think that's a much better idea than trying to rush through school and then be a minor, yet be expected to enter the real world. The growing up part is important too. No need to rush it. You've got lots and lots of time to be an adult.

    As for university, I dunno about where you went but where I went you could complete it as fast as you could handle. You can CLEP a lot of stuff, and with a dean's permission take as many units as would fit in your schedule. Completing a degree in 2 years would be an amazing amount of work, but perfectly doable if you could handle the load.

    1. Re:Also in some cases by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      My parents had similar sentiments. Instead of being accelerated through school, they just put me in the "Gifted Class" -- which was fine by me, because most of the kids in there were my friends (and the cute girls in school) anyway.

      By the time I reached highschool, I slept through every single lecture, and aced all my classes. 90% of the time I spent there was "wasted" on an academic level -- but it gave me the experience of being on the football team and debate team (and I tell you, in their own way, some of the dumbest football players had it more together than some of the smartest debate kids). I liked going to school, because that's where I saw all my friends, every day.

      Then I hit college, and started writing essays about my English professors and how they're just bitter throwbacks who will never be the philosophers they want to be, because they don't recognize any wisdom that predated the Age of Enlightenment... Damn general ed credits... At least my highschool teachers had a bloody sense of humor about it.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    2. Re:Also in some cases by Idiomatick · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You are basing your entire argument on the assumption that skipping grades hurts your ability to socialize. Yet you have no proof or even explanation of this. I posit more intelligent students would have a better time getting along with elder students. And that skipping a grade is no more harmful to your social education than is moving. And that may be beneficial to your social education, learning to adapt to the new environment could be good (it was for me personally). Seeing the world from a different perspective may give you a different set of insights. Just because it is different doesn't mean it's wrong, unless that is the social lesson you are trying to impart. I think completing high school and university early could give him time to explore other interests of his. I doubt his parents will throw him out on his own just because he finished university when he could have taken 10more years.

      In any case I find this is one of those things society has taken for granted as common knowledge but it has no studies backing it and no real logical foundation to stand on, yet policy is built around it.

    3. Re:Also in some cases by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Why is education tied so inextricably to socialization, though? That's the main problem... we need to find a way for kids to be able to be educated about things separately from being socialized.

    4. Re:Also in some cases by selven · · Score: 1

      My parents force me to skip ahead multiple grades sometimes, and I'm the one complaining about social issues. Turns out it's actually not that bad after the first few days.

    5. Re:Also in some cases by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      You are basing your entire argument on the assumption that skipping grades hurts your ability to socialize. Yet you have no proof or even explanation of this. I posit more intelligent students would have a better time getting along with elder students. And that skipping a grade is no more harmful to your social education than is moving. And that may be beneficial to your social education, learning to adapt to the new environment could be good (it was for me personally). Seeing the world from a different perspective may give you a different set of insights. Just because it is different doesn't mean it's wrong, unless that is the social lesson you are trying to impart. I think completing high school and university early could give him time to explore other interests of his. I doubt his parents will throw him out on his own just because he finished university when he could have taken 10more years.

      In any case I find this is one of those things society has taken for granted as common knowledge but it has no studies backing it and no real logical foundation to stand on, yet policy is built around it.

      The 12-14 year old kids at my college were completely isolated, basically because they were terrified to leave their rooms or talk to anyone, even in class discussions. It's an anecdote, sure, but there were several of them. Or there were at first, before most disappeared, I'm guessing to either drop out or go some place closer to home. Dorms + children = bad.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    6. Re:Also in some cases by XcepticZP · · Score: 1

      As for university, I dunno about where you went but where I went you could complete it as fast as you could handle. You can CLEP a lot of stuff, and with a dean's permission take as many units as would fit in your schedule. Completing a degree in 2 years would be an amazing amount of work, but perfectly doable if you could handle the load.

      Well at my specific university, they stipulate the minimum and maximum number of years you need to complete a degree. Taking classes a year ahead of you isn't allowed due to prerequisite requirements and all that, not to mention that you need credits from one year to advance to the next. They have all sorts of rules and regulations to prevent precisely that which I'm complaining about. The only time you can do it is with the approval of the dean. And that only happens with genius people.

      I'm currently in a South African university, University of Pretoria. Supposedly the best one in the country, but I wouldn't be so sure about that, seeing the kind of illiterate people they allow entrance to.

    7. Re:Also in some cases by Rycross · · Score: 1

      Because school is where they have the most interaction with their peers. They spend eight hours of the day with their peers in school. At home, they may or may not be playing with other neighborhood children. These days, it leans more towards may-not, since parents are becoming increasingly paranoid about letting their children play outside.

    8. Re:Also in some cases by johnthorensen · · Score: 1

      Your mom is a SMART lady. Kudos to her for making the right decision; she saved you from a lot of potential misery. I represent the flip side of that situation. I skipped 2nd grade at one of the more rural schools in the district. Let me tell you, kids are MEAN. They don't take kindly to a strange, young kid coming into their midst, especially one that's smarter than they are (like you, I probably could have skipped 3rd too). The whole thing set me up to be an outcast, and I wound up even more socially awkward than I already was. It wasn't until I finally got to college that I finally started to feel comfortable, like I had a real peer group with people that didn't resent me. High school wasn't terrible, but junior high and elementary school were hell. If my kids wind up in the position to skip a grade, no way. Parents feel 'proud' of their kids but it's not worth the pain just to pat yourself on the back that your kid skipped a grade. DON'T DO IT!

    9. Re:Also in some cases by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Hey now, It is important for kids to spend a dozen years in rooms full of people the exact same age as them. After all, we all know that for the rest of their lives, they are going to be spending most of their time in rooms full of people the exact same age as them.

    10. Re:Also in some cases by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Another thing i'd like to point out. You have no proof that if those kids were instead held back that they'd do any better. I remember super geniuses in my school that could have skipped 10grades if they were allowed and they were just as isolated. I think a large part of it has to do with the type of person you need to be to be in uni at 12...

    11. Re:Also in some cases by Nocturnal+Deviant · · Score: 1

      The problem with your logic is that each case is extremely situational.

      I graduated at 16(i wont even say im half as smart as that kid at 11...i was probably still wetting the bed at 11..well that's a bit of an exaggeration but you get the gist), i was testing 11th grade at 11 years old, I can openly say, had i not been skipped ahead, i would have turned out much for the worse, the problem when you dont let children bloom in their natural environment(be it gifted or special classes) they tend to not be nearly as efficient.

      Then again was in no way socially mature enough to be skipped, but what it came down to is more of a crash course in social interaction. In the short run it did have its bad effects(IE: imagine being half the size of a normal freshman on senior beat down day.), but it also taught me how to interact much better with those older than me, and when you apply for a job at a younger age, more than likely your boss is going to be at least 10 years your senior, and being able to interact on the same level can make a relatively large difference.

      --
      -Noc
    12. Re:Also in some cases by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Same thing with me. I ended up taking enough advanced classes (good school district) my senior year to get me out of 4(?) intro college classes- I think 2 calc and 2 chemistry (ha! didn't have to take any chemistry in college). And as another replier posted, I got more time for football, basketball, theatre, and hellraisin'.

      As for those who said there are no studies on accelerated learning and social problems, yes there have been. No, I'm not providing links 'cause I found a couple in about 10 seconds of google searching. Searching PsychInfo gave more, but I had to go through the university library website to search that. I didn't read the articles, so they may have said there is no problem at all, but the arguments were that there were no studies.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    13. Re:Also in some cases by martas · · Score: 1

      I'm actually kind of sick of this argument. Yes, social development is important. Yes, it's hard enough for geeks to fit in without the age difference. Yes, looking down on people is generally a bad idea, including looking down on people who are dumber than you are. But is it any better to look down on someone because they're not good at sports? Because they can't be a cheerleader? Because they aren't as funny/charming/interesting in social settings? Because they can't get laid? Etc.

      I agree that completely disregarding social development isn't a good idea, because it can lead to sad and, in some cases, tragically self-destructive lives due to social isolation. But as things stand today, I think people tend to pay a disproportionate amount of attention to social over academic development. Now, don't get me wrong, I'd probably have made the same decision as you mom did, because I wouldn't want my kids to be miserable. And, because of this, everyone is stuck in this Nash equilibrium, where not enough people make non-traditional choices for their kids. Until this changes, quarterbacks will epitomize happiness and success, and geeks will hide in their bedrooms/dorm rooms for fear of not being accepted by the "cool kids".

    14. Re:Also in some cases by tunapez · · Score: 1

      Completing a degree in 2 years would be an amazing amount of work, but perfectly doable if you could handle the load.

      Actually, the rule at my school(ASU), and I believe for all US colleges, is any credits over 18, max of 21, per regular semester requires a teacher and dean's(office) sig. Summer school max is 12 credits, 2 classes per 6 week course, 2 courses per summer). Two years maxed out would only yield you 108 credits of the 126 required to graduate(21+21+12+21+21+12).

        2 years + 1 semester would be the fastest possible means to a conventional grad'n.

      That's how I did it back in the '90's anyway, a real PIA running to get them sigs every semester. Between the sig running, wrangling to get the right classes and working 3rd shift to afford the degree I stumbled and had to take an extra semester... took me exactly 36 months to tally 127 credits.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    15. Re:Also in some cases by tunapez · · Score: 1

      conventional grad'n = Bachelor Degree, in lieu of an Associates(2 year) degree.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    16. Re:Also in some cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The smaller you are, the more you will be picked on. Skipping grades puts you next to people 1-2 years older than you and much more physically mature. This isn't rocket science.

    17. Re:Also in some cases by WeirdJohn · · Score: 1

      It's hard enough for a gifted child to grow up emotionally balanced and ethically clear-minded. Far too many gifted kids end up on drugs or worse. In most normal schools the gifted runs a strong chance of being socially isolated. The kid doesn't usually notice this (after all his real friends are books) but he does when he has to interact with normal people later in life.

      I'm currently working in a school for gifted kids, and the main emphasis is on them getting this social stuff together. In some cases it's working, in others you can see that the kids need a really big dose of reality and relax. Too many of them don't get jokes, ride bikes, climb trees or jump in rivers.

      As for your contention there is no proof, just go to the literature. Social isolation amongst the gifted is commonly observed, especially between 10 and 16 years old. I also lived it as a child, and have the physical scars to show what can happen to a smart-alec kid who tries to mix with the other kids without pretending to be some one he isn't (cool knife Pete - oh shit, that really hurts when it hits bone).

      Being a child genius is really hard unless you have an amazing support network. Most 140+ kids have parents and teachers who have no idea what it's like.

    18. Re:Also in some cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While not proof per se, a real-life example. I was bumped up in grade school. After being bored to tears in kindergarten, I tested for, and was moved into, 1st grade. Good news, I was finally getting challenged, academically. Bad news, I was now in the 1st percentile curve for height & weight. What did this mean? I was always the lightest and shortest kid in the class. Sometimes this was a benefit, but I had to be creative to find "little guy" exploits for my situation. I was always the last picked for team sports. I was a primary target of the bullies. (I developed some strategies for this, but that often got me into trouble - another chapter). Things started to get a little better in 6th through 8th grades (I would estimate I moved up to the 10th percentile, weight/height-wise). Not until freshman year in HS did I really start to feel like I fit in. So, in retrospect, I would say socially it did have a huge influence on my "formative" years.

    19. Re:Also in some cases by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      I graduated early and went to University about 4 years early. I was the only non-adult for a few years in my classes, but it was fine. 90% of the people I met were half-wits and the other 10% didn't mind that I was young. I ceased to notice the age difference in my first year. I'm glad I missed out on those 4 years of pre-college school. Social skills, like mental skills, are in the mind. They can't be accelerated in the same way as academic development, because you can't cram them like you might some academic subject. Nonetheless they can be learnt as quickly as you like. I suppose what's wanting is a little imagination and conscious effort to learn them.

    20. Re:Also in some cases by RockoTDF · · Score: 1

      I think everyone is confusing correlation with causation here. Research shows that kids who skip a few grades if able are normally more well adjusted. Sending a 12 year old to a university is a different ball of wax. The kid might not be a social type anyway, but having them live by themselves in the dorms will never work when their neighbors are interested in drinking and sex. Also, there are universities with programs that specialize in taking in teenagers (such as Mary Baldwin for women), keeping them in separate dorms until they are mature enough (16 or 17) to live with normal aged students.

      --
      There is more to science than physics!

      www.iomalfunction.blogspot.com
    21. Re:Also in some cases by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And in my case, I was an outcast and didn't skip any grades. If I had skipped any grades, I'd have been as much an outcast, and would have gotten to college faster. And yes, I had a good friend in college that entered at 16. No one cared. My wife entered college at 16. No one cared. If I could have skipped a grade or two, I'd have jumped at the opportunity. However, being dyslexic, the fact that I was 2 grades ahead in English was hidden by poor writing skills, so I wasn't ever given the opportunity (and, if you are on-par with English and 4 grades ahead with math, they will never move you up).

    22. Re:Also in some cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could've skipped grades but my parents decided against it.

      Now I'm a social recluse with little drive for achievement. As time passed my grades went from straight A's to B's to C's. For the past 3 years at my university I sleep in on most classes and still get B's and A's in any class that doesn't require daily attendance.

      What does this say hmm? By showing children that their successes have little gain in reality, they don't need to try as hard because there's a bare minimum that's required? Why on earth should I give enough effort to gain 150% when I can cruise by with 100%. Or 90%. Or hell, 80% seems fine too.

      It could possibly be that my intelligence stagnated as time passed because I was forced to associate with those of lesser intelligence for most of my life. I've still got that wacky high IQ, but I don't quite know why I should use it.

      And being a social recluse is just because of who I am. If I had skipped grades I'd probably still be a social recluse. Or I might not have been. Either way, I could only have benefited.

      I don't hold it against my parents though. They did what they felt was for the best. Good intentions can't be faulted for differing situations.

    23. Re:Also in some cases by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Skipping from junior year in high school to freshman in college is one thing because you're developed significantly already. But skipping when you've just lost your front teeth to an age in which your class peers are thinking about boners and periods and sex and dating is a different ball of wax.

    24. Re:Also in some cases by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. I forgot that puberty hit on a hard schedule. For some reason I was thinking that the range that different people hit puberty was was something like a 6 year span, and it is not entirely uncommon for it to be even wider. That and they will never be interacting with people who are thinking about boners and periods and sex and dating when they are not.

    25. Re:Also in some cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would say it depends greatly on the individual situation. Both the school environment and the individual child should be considered.

      My case was similar to yours - I moved up to 3rd grade in the middle of 2nd - except that my transition was fairly painless. I was never a popular kid, and I was pretty quiet and shy for the most part, but I don't remember having any major trouble making friends. Of course the occasional bully picked on me, but no more than any of the other "smart" kids. I can recall numerous kids from my school history who were picked on ruthlessly, but not me.

      Looking back, I can think of a few reason why things went fairly smoothly for me:

      1. My elementary school grouped kids into "units" where two grades of kids were paired into a few open classrooms in the same area of the building. 1st and 2nd graders were together in one unit, 3rd and 4th graders in another, and 5th and 6th graders in the last. Within each unit, some classes would mix together kids from both grades while others would separate them out, depending on the subject matter. Because of this setup, I already knew a lot of the kids in the next grade up from when I was in 1st grade, together in the same unit with them as 2nd graders.

      2. My best friend at the time was 2 years older than me, so he was in 4th grade when I made the jump from 2nd to 3rd. Not only did I know a lot of the 3rd graders from the previous year, but my friend helped me get to know the rest of the 3rd-4th grade unit I was joining.

      3. While still in 2nd grade, I was already joining the 3rd graders once a day for Reading class. So again, I already knew a lot of them pretty well.

      I think the design of the school, particularly mixing kids of different grade levels, was pretty clearly an integral part of my smooth transition to the next grade. In another situation, where different classes were totally isolated, I could see myself having great difficulty. I've always been very uncomfortable in unfamiliar social situations, so being thrust into a group of older kids I didn't know at all could have been pretty devastating.

      I'm replying a day late, so sue me!

    26. Re:Also in some cases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One less year getting wedgies.
      One less year getting your ass kicked.
      One less year as a wall flower.
      One less year getting laughed at by jocks and cheerleaders.

  37. Sheldon Cooper? by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thought "that's a Sheldon Cooper right there" when he read that article?

  38. False humility by Ltap · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How much are you willing to bet that he just said that for the reporters (or was told to say that BY the reporters)? If I were 11, I would be bragging away. Also, 1st comment is right - he rushed through on an easy degree. He should come back when he gets his doctorate - that's the real test. Just as an anecdote - I could have been taking university courses at 15 or 16 (virtually anyone with a grade 9-level education can, since the rest is basically rehashing and enhancing on whatever is already learned), but many universities simply do not allow minors to enroll, whether they have a high school diploma or not. It's likely there was an exception made for him, and he was also likely homeschooled (unless he got his HS diploma by age 9). This is similar to the 9-year-old judge and all 'prodigies'. Many of them, especially ones in objective fields deserve their degrees, but you wonder sometimes about whether connections made more of a difference in trailblazing a path for his future.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  39. And was never heard from again. . . by Xerolooper · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You see this happen all the time they push kids who are really smart so hard they fizzle out. I went to a special school for "gifted" children and most of my friends were burned out by their mid 20's. Not to mention depressed because they didn't make their first million by the age of 25. I "gave up" dropped contact with all my smart friends and got a "civil service" job. Ignorance truly is bliss, if your not freaked out by the state of the world you probably don't understand what is going on. The world doesn't know what to do with gifted people and gifted people are sideswiped by the fact that even though logically and by all reason they should succeed they don't. The world just doesn't work that way.

    --
    "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    1. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "logically and by all reason they should succeed"?!? That's bullshit. The ability to do well on IQ tests has never been a valid predictor of success in life. What is the most important predictor of success? Being born to the right parents! Failing that, the ability to delude yourself into thinking you are the best is one of most important ingredients to success. Making the right friends also helps, which is why getting into a "good" school is so important. Your sense of disappointment comes from bad assumptions; you assumed that since academics were so easy for you to master, that everything else in life would be also. It doesn't work that way. Life isn't fair; persistence is frequently rewarded more than excellence, and bullshit is frequently rewarded more than anything else. For many important questions there is no one "right" answer like there was in school.

      That being said, you can still make a difference in the world. A "civil servant" who actually cares about helping other people is an anomaly; try your best to be one. Try not to get frustrated by the fact that for most people it is more about CYA than getting tangible results. And, take it easy on yourself... you're only human after all.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...The world doesn't know what to do with gifted people and gifted people are sideswiped by the fact that even though logically and by all reason they should succeed they don't. The world just doesn't work that way.

      If you don't know how the world works, then you aren't really gifted, are you? You're just really good at crunching numbers, or writing essays, or a worst, good at giving the education system what it wants. The truly gifted are those that know how to either relax, take it easy and have a comfortable life, or those that are motivated to succeed and make some cash. Giftedness is not knowing how the world SHOULD work and getting upset when it doesn't; it is knowing how the world DOES work, and taking full advantage of that knowledge. You sir, appear to be truly gifted :)

    3. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by billcopc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      gifted people are sideswiped by the fact that even though logically and by all reason they should succeed they don't

      That is not a fact, it is a false truth. We assume smart people should succeed, because schools still promote "smart" even though they're selling mere indoctrination. Those who consistently succeed in this world are the Average Joes with strong social connections, because one genius is no match for a mob of angry norms.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by frallon · · Score: 1

      I had a path similar to the one you described - gifted high school, Ivy League college, burnout. Though instead of "civil service" I have ended up in a dilbert corporate cubicle job to pay the mortgage.

      I hope this boy doesn't get Lost in the Meritocracy like I did.

      Check out:
      Lost in the Meritocracy - The Atlantic (January/February 2005)


      Lost in the Meritocracy: The Undereducation of an Overachiever by Walter Kirn

      --
      I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom.
      General George S. Patton

    5. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Being smart isn't all there is to success. You also have to be in control of your emotions. And before age 25 or so, the part of the brain that handles emotions is still in flux. This kid genius could very well become too stressed or depressed to continue his out-performance once puberty kicks in.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    6. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see this happen all the time they push kids who are really smart so hard they fizzle out. I went to a special school for "gifted" children and most of my friends were burned out by their mid 20's. Not to mention depressed because they didn't make their first million by the age of 25.

      Me too! (gifted children's program, I mean. Also depressed that I haven't made my first million by age, er, more than 25)

      So, now that I have had more than fifty years to think about this, it has occurred to me to wonder how I got the label "gifted".

      What I mean is, how do I know the people who assigned the label were competent?

    7. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      choke on a dick, nub

    8. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      The world just doesn't work that way.

      As one would expect since the world, or human 'civilized' society anyway, is neither logical nor fair.

    9. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      "logically and by all reason they should succeed"?!? That's bullshit.

      Your absolutely right that was my point. So called "gifted" children are told that they will succeed because they are so gifted and when harsh reality sets in they often burn out. Your Lucky if your not smart enough to figure that out till college. Then at least you might meet someone who can get you a decent job. However I would say like hard work persistence is it's own reward.

      I feel a lot more successful since I changed my priorities. Not lowering the bar just realizing it didn't even matter.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    10. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      I had a path similar to the one you described - gifted high school, Ivy League college, burnout. Though instead of "civil service" I have ended up in a dilbert corporate cubicle job to pay the mortgage.

      I hope this boy doesn't get Lost in the Meritocracy like I did.

      Check out: Lost in the Meritocracy - The Atlantic (January/February 2005)

      Lost in the Meritocracy: The Undereducation of an Overachiever by Walter Kirn

      -- I don't measure a man's success by how high he climbs but how high he bounces when he hits bottom. General George S. Patton

      Great link Frallon. I enjoyed the story. Reminds me a lot of my Sisters experiences in medical school. At least as far as the tendency to be socially ostracized since she was there on her merits and missing one well off family. You can succeed on merit in America but only so far. But what is life really all about anyway? Am I more of a success because I have a faithful wife and healthy children or is it something else?

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    11. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Being smart isn't all there is to success. You also have to be in control of your emotions.

      Spock and Data may be the ideal for geekdom, but controlling your emotions is not a key to success. Balmer throws chairs and would be considered a "success" by nearly all measures. Yeah, if you cuss out your boss every time you think he deserves it, then you'll probably be homeless quick, but any reasonable "control" is sufficient, not even above average is necessary to become a "success."

    12. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Mazin07 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you didn't have the gift of exploiting your "giftedness". Some people start a business or invent things or go into research. Maybe it's not that the world didn't know what to do with gifted people, but that these "gifted" people didn't figure out what to do with themselves.

      Or blame the world. I'm sure that falls under some high-brow philosophical school of thinking.

    13. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You see this happen all the time they push kids who are really smart so hard they fizzle out. I went to a special school for "gifted" children and most of my friends were burned out by their mid 20's. Not to mention depressed because they didn't make their first million by the age of 25. I "gave up" dropped contact with all my smart friends and got a "civil service" job. Ignorance truly is bliss, if your not freaked out by the state of the world you probably don't understand what is going on. The world doesn't know what to do with gifted people and gifted people are sideswiped by the fact that even though logically and by all reason they should succeed they don't. The world just doesn't work that way.

      I think i saw a movie about you. it was called LITTLE MAN TATE.

    14. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by Xerolooper · · Score: 1

      Or maybe you didn't have the gift of exploiting your "giftedness". Some people start a business or invent things or go into research. Maybe it's not that the world didn't know what to do with gifted people, but that these "gifted" people didn't figure out what to do with themselves.

      Or blame the world. I'm sure that falls under some high-brow philosophical school of thinking.

      It's not about blame. You're treated like a circus act and when their done with you it's all over your on your own. Once I hit adulthood I figured it out for myself. But, we're talking about children here. They only know what their parents and teachers have been feeding them. Then all of a sudden all the bull meets with reality and you can't blame someone for being a little tiny bit disillusioned by that.

      But I'm sure that blame the victim is some popular philosophical school of thinking.

      --
      "The stupid neither forgive nor forget; the naive forgive and forget; the wise forgive but do not forget." -Thomas Szasz
    15. Re:And was never heard from again. . . by frallon · · Score: 1

      But what is life really all about anyway? Am I more of a success because I have a faithful wife and healthy children or is it something else?

      Those are big questions...
      The Harvard Grant study has tried to address those issues. Here is a recent article about the study (also from the Atlantic):
      What Makes Us Happy? - The Atlantic (June 2009)

  40. This is in direct contrast to Einstien by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    Albert:
    Tried to gain admittance to college several times.
    It took over a dozen papers (including the photon concept) for him to gain admittance to college.
    He intensely disliked rote learning, clashing with instructors and administrators over it.
    Had a reputation to goof off (He was actually having some lovely brainstorms, one storm on space-time coming to him as he was riding a bus.)
    Was a ladies man (They really wigged out when he broke out his violin).

    The kid had better get used to failure; poor Albert was rife with it throughout his life.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  41. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by jgtg32a · · Score: 1

    extra 15 if you write down your feelings

  42. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

    Social peers is all to often a nice waying of saying "hang out with the half wits"

    It is a nice way of saying hang out with the half wits. But the thing you're missing is, often the alternative is "hang out with the half wits who are sensitive about it and also outweigh you by a large margin".

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  43. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by sexconker · · Score: 1

    I believe MENSA requires an IQ of 160 or higher.
    Of course, IQ tests are retarded - the younger you are the higher your score, for the same performance.

    This is why you get a lot of stories about "genius" kids and toddlers, when in fact, they're just above-average with parents who got them tested.

  44. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    Genius is 130+, retarded is -70, and average is 100.

    I always thought genius was defined as 140+. Hot Damn, I just became a genius! Call out to all the Mensa chicks: New [int]elligible bachelor!

  45. I smell BS by kenp2002 · · Score: 1

    Checked the school, no astrophysics.

    The article is peppered with some glaring political agendas to boot.

    I am also curious how a 4 year college would let a kid this smart end up in a community college.

    There is too much to this that lacks reason.

    Something smells...

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
  46. This is not that unusual by cortesoft · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not sure why this is newsworthy. When I was a freshman in college, one of the kids on our floor was a 14 year old starting his PHd in Computer Science. He already had his bachelors from UC Berkeley. He fit in ok, and we properly corrupted him, and he had his PHd by 17. I know other kids who did similar things. The academic work is not THAT difficult for lots of younger kids. Socially it is a bit harder, but many of the kids who decide to go to college do so not just because they are academically ready, but because they have trouble fitting in with kids their own age. Hell, I took many college courses while I was in middle and high school. We even talked about skipping grades, but I liked the social and athletic aspects of middle and highschool too much. Sure, the work was easy... which gave me more time to mess around and be a kid. For these kids, they clearly do not enjoy the social experience of highschool, so they skip it. It isn't like the kid is some sort of mad genius.

  47. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by macbeth66 · · Score: 1

    Nah! He ain't a genius.

    Most kids coming through the US education system are idiots. Not their fault, the idiot teachers are turning them into idiots. They are not allowed to think for themselves and must parrot back the poltically correct drivel that is hammered into them.

    I guess this kid managed to escape his teacher's clutches.

  48. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Tetsujin · · Score: 5, Funny

    com'on now, dont you get 30 points automaticlly for writting your name? Maybe an extra 10 if you spell it correctly....

    "your name". "it".

    Ha! 40 points, bitches!

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  49. Oh yea... by psychicsword · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh yea... Well I bet he hasn't been laid. ...
    Oh wait neither have I. fuck!

  50. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

    com'on now, dont you get 30 points automaticlly for writting your name? Maybe an extra 10 if you spell it correctly....

    I got ZERRO pointz for splelling!

    I was ROBED!

  51. Do the stupid homework by Itninja · · Score: 1

    So she says, "Uh-uh, You don't have a challenge, you need a challenge." So now I'm challenged, all right- I'm challenged to hold on to my lunch money because of all the big mooses who wanna pound me, 'cause they think I'm a shrimpy dork who thinks he's smarter than them! But I don't think I'm smarter, I just do the stupid homework! If everyone else JUST DID THE STUPID HOMEWORK, they could [get a degree in astrophysics] and get pounded, too! Is there anymore coffee?

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  52. around here 5 is genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1 is retarded

  53. Still by fulldecent · · Score: 0, Troll

    ... and his cohorts will still get a job before him.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  54. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Neko-kun · · Score: 1

    Ahem...

    Oh, trust me, they find a way. His quote about waiting two years set off a flag in my mind since 13 is the youngest that they'll consider someone for this program.
    And how do I know? A good deal of my classes have at least one student from this program and I've been friends with a few since I started.

    They do in fact have a good program to support the 'fitting in' part of the social aspects of the university culture, and luckily I've only meet the socially competent ones.
    Now why am I not bothered by them? Because there's a plague known as the visual and performing arts.
    The other ones are alright, but the ones belonging to dance and theater are HIGHLY disliked by the general school population.

  55. IQ genius cutoff varies by test, age bias by davidwr · · Score: 1

    Different IQ tests have different curves. For some, the top 2% is 140, for others 150. All have 100 as average. I'm not sure what the numbers are for the "legal IQ" used to determine mental retardation for death-penalty cases.

    As far as age bias goes, that's supposed to end at or before age 18 - a 20-, 30-, 40-, 50-, and 100-year old with the same answers on the same test should have the same IQ. A 10 year old with those same answers would score much higher, and a 5-year-old higher still.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:IQ genius cutoff varies by test, age bias by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what the numbers are for the "legal IQ" used to determine mental retardation for death-penalty cases.

      I think it's i if you're in Texas ...

    2. Re:IQ genius cutoff varies by test, age bias by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The imaginary square root of -1?

  56. So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this only child of a Taiwanese mother and an Israeli father

    So, what do you call this kid? A "kink" or a "chike"?

    "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."

    Don't worry about that. As the Georgia Guidestones indicate, the world's population will soon be reduced to 500 million.

  57. 1+1=2 by davidwr · · Score: 1

    1+1=2. The fundamental theorem of calculus. The law of sines. Yeah, we got the ideological bias of classical mathematics hammered into us. If we tried to argue that we were using a totally different system of math, we were taught to "just do it the right way for the test" but the good math teachers quietly encouraged us to keep studying the other maths on the q.t. The best ones even helped us, all on the sly of course.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  58. Genius by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."
    heh but I think the avg /. poster usually does :P

  59. Let me be the first to say... by SmlFreshwaterBuffalo · · Score: 1

    Good luck finding a job in this economy. He better find something special to bring to the table just to get noticed...

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say... by edmudama · · Score: 1

      He's probably too young to get a "real" job according to many state labor laws.

      When I was a kid, you had to be 14.5 to get a work permit, and could only work 20 hours/week. At 15 you could work 28 hours/week, and at 16 you could then work full-time (40 hours).

      --
      More data, damnit!
  60. Sometimes by wurp · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Read up on John Von Neumann.

    At six years old, he memorized pages out of phone books faster than most people could read them as a party trick. As an adult, he invented modern computer memory architecture, made foundational advances in quantum mechanics, invented the entire field of game theory, and helped work on the nuclear bomb.

    1. Re:Sometimes by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      And Mozart. That still leaves the Successful Wunderkinds - Flopped Wunderkinds score at 2:81285, at last count...

    2. Re:Sometimes by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Read up on John Von Neumann.

      At six years old, he memorized pages out of phone books faster than most people could read them as a party trick. As an adult, he invented modern computer memory architecture, made foundational advances in quantum mechanics, invented the entire field of game theory, and helped work on the nuclear bomb.

      I was going to point out the case of John Stuart Mill, who wrote a compendium of Political Economy when he was about 13 and knew ancient Greek when he was 3.

      But then I realised that all the ancient Greeks themselves could speak ancient Greek when they were three. Makes you think, doesn't it.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    3. Re:Sometimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's just one example, is it a recurring pattern? Thomas Edison for example was a dropout and whilst Einstein was a bright kid there was nothing about him when young that suggested he was a prodigy or above any of the other kids. He too dropped out of school. Andrew Wiles and Stephen Hawking were also not exceptional as children at school and were only average students.

      Do child prodigies consistently end up doing better, is it for any other reason than they're given more opportunities?

      For every Von Neummann is there a Stephen Hawking or Andrew Wiles and again, if there is is it for any reason other than child prodigies being given more opportunities?

      I don't think it's as simple as the idea that a kid is bright when young so must continue developing at that accellerated pace as they grow older. I think like with everything in the development of humans - some people are tall when young, but don't grow much after that and only end up an average height, whilst sometimes the shorter kids put on a massive growth spurt and end up tall. Sometimes the taller kids continue to grow and remain tall certainly, but it's not guaranteed. I believe the same is likely with intelligence, that rapid growth in intelligence at a young age does not guarantee it for life.

      I went to school with a child prodigy in physics, at the age of 11 he understood many theories surrounding black holes, he understood much of the details of nuclear weaponry, but as he aged he lost his pace somewhat, he's doing well now working at GCHQ in the UK but then, so are two of his class mates that I also went to school with and who were normal achievers. All 3 are in the same role and on the same wage, doing the same things just as well as each other.

    4. Re:Sometimes by wurp · · Score: 1

      I think the thing to take away from all of this is that you should never think of options as closed to you. I would say that being a child prodigy gives you a great advantage, if you are willing to take advantage of it. But don't let the judgement of others make you rest on your laurels, or make you decide you've failed before you begin. Go after what you want, and play hard at it, whether people see you as a wunderkind or a dummkopf.

  61. proof of intellegence by mikeee · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, no. You're assuming he actually means it. More likely is the possibility that when he says "I'm not a genius because there are 6.5 billion people with unique gifts" he knows it isn't true, but is a good way to keep the other 11-year-olds from kicking his smart ass.

    1. Re:proof of intellegence by Deadstick · · Score: 1

      You never have the mod points when you need them...

      rj

    2. Re:proof of intellegence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No the actual way of keeping other 11-year-olds from kicking his smart ass, is skipping 7 courses and dealing with them once they are in their twenties. Wow, this boy is a genius.

  62. Define success by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If "success" is what other people tell you it is, you may fail or even fail to try.

    If "success" is what you tell yourself it is, you will try and your odds of success are a lot higher.

    For me, success is leaving humanity better than I found it. So far, so good.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  63. fuzzy numbers by Tim4444 · · Score: 1

    The world population is closer to 6.8 billion (US Census Bureau) and still increasing. I wonder if he used the same kind of sloppy approximation when reporting his GPA.

    I find Jaime Escalante's achievements far more inspiring as far as LA students go.

  64. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Plunky · · Score: 1

    I believe MENSA requires an IQ of 160 or higher.

    No, just the top 2% but they do say that tests vary. IIRC an intelligence test should be tailored to the range that you are expecting the candidate to score in, they must be able to get wrong answers because all questions correct only indicates the test was too easy.

    Also, intelligence of young persons varies as they mature, this boy is nowhere near finished with his development and could be a hard pushed early starter or a true star in the making. Its not really possible to know at this stage and there is plenty of time to fall by the wayside..

  65. off-topic: Sorry this happened. by davidwr · · Score: 1

    This is derailing the thread, but I'm sorry this happened to you.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  66. Ugh.... by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of his primary interests is "wormholes," a hypothetical scientific phenomenon connected to Albert Einstein's theory of relativity. It has been theorized that if such holes do exist in space, they could â" in tandem with black holes â" allow for the kind of space-age time travel seen in science fiction.

    "space-age time travel"?

    "Just like black holes, they suck in particulate objects, and also like black holes, they also travel at escape velocity, which is, the speed to get out of there is faster than the speed of light," Cavalin says. "I'd like to prove that wormholes are really there and prove all the theories are correct."

    "they also travel at escape velocity"?

    Actually, though, we pick on him - about it being a community college, about his hokey "everyone is smart in their own way" line, etc. - but it does sound like he's a pretty smart kid, who's hopefully developing the kind of attitude which will help him avoid turning into a condescending prick later on.

    His attitude about video games - from a practical standpoint he's exactly right. Video games are a major time-sink. If you're someone who wants to achieve things, that kind of time-sink can be a real problem. Honestly I feel like it'll become something of a dilemma for me, especially once I have kids. I really enjoy games, but I don't want them to be how I spend all my time... And likewise, I wouldn't particularly want to deprive my little ones of the joys of gaming - but I don't want them to fall into it like a trap, either. There's so much a person can do when they're young - I wouldn't want them to waste that time the way I generally did.

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  67. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by azgard · · Score: 1

    And that's a good thing. Because if so, he really believes that.

  68. The enemy's gate is down by kkrajewski · · Score: 1

    But how well does he command the other kids in Battle School?

    BTW, that makes me wish I hadn't settled for the AA in Thermonuclear Warfare program.

  69. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, but it's -10 points for misspelling automatically when there's a spell-check function in the browser...

  70. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pretty cool. Although if I may play devil's advocate for a minute...
    I live in L.A. and I've seen the community colleges here. This isn't so much an accomplishment for the child as it is a condemning of ELAC. ELAC's a joke, even by the poor standards set by the other community colleges in L.A. If you've ever been in one of those classrooms you'll see what I mean... There are potatoes smarter than the average L.A community college student.

  71. Re:The Ballad of Moshe Kai by Dishevel · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    It's definately flamebait. Well done flamebait though.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  72. /. 4 Digit Account by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    Moshe Kai Cavalin also has a 4 digit /. account.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  73. Living example by pigwiggle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    of public school failure. I have a BS in both chemistry and mathematics, minored in physics. Have a PhD in Physical Chemistry ,Theory. A successful career in research. I almost didn't graduate high school- failed most of my math, failed physics and chemistry. Ended with less than a 2.0 in my core classes, and had to petitioned to graduate. It's hard for me to say exactly why. That was 20 years ago, and my memory is a bit foggy. Luckily, my state university admitted me based on promising entrance exam scores. Mom and Dad didn't go to college, so they weren't really in a good position to line me out for it. I wasn't invited to my high school's prep sessions for the college entrance exams. I think they assumed I wouldn't be interested. I have always been into science type stuff. I read Einstein's primer on special relativity in high school. Loved pop science stuff - Brief History of Time, anything by Sagan, and so forth. Somehow none of my high school teachers were able to capitalize on it. Maybe it was because they didn't have much going on, themselves. I remember my high school physics teacher commenting that he went into education because he couldn't quite make the general physics curriculum. This was in the context of explaining just how hard quantum mechanics was, and that nobody really understood it. Well, I understand it, and use it frequently. It's fun for me to think about because it's so weird. It would have been nice if the special, advanced classes I had in grade school had a counterpart in my high school. Wonder where I would be now.

    --
    46 & 2
  74. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    I don't think there's a well-established standard for characterizing genius. It's just a subjective word, like tall. If someone says someone is tall, you don't say, no, he's not tall. He's 6'4" and the definition of tall is 6'6" or higher.

  75. Being held back is not good either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The biggest problem with being held back when you excel academically in order to encourage social development will often result in a gifted child who desires to learn more to become bored and jaded with curriculum that they have already mastered while their classmates are still struggling with the same concepts. This is what happened to me in Junior High and affected me through High school as well. While I was operating on an intellectual level much in advance of my peers, I spent most of my time making problems because I was bored, and fell into a cycle of passive-aggressive rebellion by refusing to do the busy work for the material I had already mastered. Funny enough, in my senior year, I actually had a couple of teachers go to bat for me with the administration when they refused to allow me to graduate because the teachers for my Chemistry II and Calculus classes refused to give my final grades because I refused to do their busy work in their classes, even though I not only aced all the tests they had given throughout the year, but i had passed both the AP Chemistry and AP Calculus exams with a 5 out of 5. It wasn't until I entered college and discovered an environment that was much more amenable to allowing me to advance as quickly as my ability would allow that I put aside the shenanigans and allowed myself to take flight.

    While holding a child back academically so they can mature socially may seem like a wise move, it all depends on the child. For me, it was the wrong decision, as I never had a problem socializing, whether it was my age-peers or the adults I encountered in my life. Sure, I had a large vocabulary when I was a child, and I tended to use longer, more complex sentences, but I could play soccer, football and baseball just like any other boy on my block, and I certainly had no problems getting the girls, especially when in High School I had developed this rebellious persona. But when I consider where I may have been in my field of study with an additional 10 years under my belt...if my son (who is now 2 years old) exhibits the same qualities, I won't hesitate in allowing him to excel to the highest level of his ability. In fact, if he shows the same aptitude that I did, then I will make the path as clear as possible for him to move as quickly academically as he desires. But, truth to tell, I will be just as happy if he doesn't show the same aptitude, as long as he is stretching himself to his full potential.

  76. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by iamhigh · · Score: 2, Interesting

    MENSA requires an IQ in the top 2%. I am a member, and trust me, that does not make a genius. A true "genius" would probably be in the Triple Nine club (99.9 percentile). But many people in either of these, are as regular as you and I, as dumb as your neighbor that never picks up his garbage cans, or as crazy as the cat lady down the street. Intelligence has pretty much zero affect on a person's successes or happiness. In fact I made a chart about it. I make a lot of charts.

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  77. Hot-Housing Considered Harmful by namgge · · Score: 1

    This story should be tagged 'Child-Abuse'.

    Namgge

  78. Now all he needs... by subtraho · · Score: 2, Funny

    is a second degree in maths and he's well on his way to waiting at the dole queue on monday.

    --
    -subtraho
  79. detract from the alma mater, not the kid by skathe · · Score: 3, Informative

    there are exactly zero community colleges that have accredited astrophysics programs. they simply don't have the funding, equipment, or facilities to carry out the experiments and other "hands-on" curriculum.

    what's really interesting about this post:

    PHYSICS 001 Mechanics of Solids

    PHYSICS 002 Mechanics of Fluids, Heat and Sound

    PHYSICS 003 Electricity and Magnetism

    PHYSICS 004 Optics and Modern Physics

    PHYSICS 006 General Physics I

    PHYSICS 007 General Physics II

    PHYSICS 011 Introductory Physics

    PHYSICS 021 General Physics I with Calculus

    PHYSICS 022 General Physics II with Calculus

    is that all the course numbers start with 0. This is usually a sign of either a) remedial courses or b) non-accredited programs.

    I understand that graduating with any sort of college degree at the age of 11 is very impressive, but this is simply NOT a degree in astrophysics, and doesn't really even approach it. Another dead give away that this is a totally bogus degree is that it's an Associates Degree of Liberal Arts. Physics, in any form, is NOT a liberal art. Being that it's not, at the very least, an Associates Degree of Science (which is still pretty shady for "astrophysics" since it's VERY theoretical) raises a huge red flag. I would be very surprised to find that even half of the credits for the courses he took are accepted at any 4 year university offering a Bachelor's of Science in Physics.

    1. Re:detract from the alma mater, not the kid by DragonWriter · · Score: 2, Informative

      is that all the course numbers start with 0. This is usually a sign of either a) remedial courses or b) non-accredited programs.

      Actually, course numbering policies differ from school to school. At at least one California community college I am familiar with, course numbers between 0 and 100 are those which are transferrable to the University of California, those from 100 - 200 are applicable toward degrees at the school (and, IIRC, may be transferrable to California State University schools) but are not transferrable to UC schools, and courses numbered 300 and above are not applicable toward a degree, but do count toward full-time status (mostly remedial programs).

      Another dead give away that this is a totally bogus degree is that it's an Associates Degree of Liberal Arts. Physics, in any form, is NOT a liberal art. Being that it's not, at the very least, an Associates Degree of Science (which is still pretty shady for "astrophysics" since it's VERY theoretical) raises a huge red flag.

      The difference, typically, between an AA (Associate in [Liberal] Arts) and an AS (Associate in Science) is typically that the non-major requirements in the former are broader and include less math and science, while in the latter they are more focussed on math and science (the same distinction exists between the BA and BS.) Requirements for courses in the major are typically the same, where schools offer both, and its not all that uncommon for schools to offer both in the same field. OTOH, its also not that uncommon for schools to offer only one type of degree, because their requirements outside the major always fit one pattern.

  80. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by laiquendi · · Score: 3, Funny

    You should probably have left eligibility as a boolean; casting to int might imply something illegal.

  81. 6.5 billion? What an idiot! by objekt · · Score: 5, Funny

    "there are 6.5 billion people in this world"

    The real number is much closer to 7 billion by now.

    Is this the kind of idiot we're handing out degrees to these days?

    --
    -- Boycott Shell
    1. Re:6.5 billion? What an idiot! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is this the kind of idiot we're handing out degrees to these days?

      Never mind. One should probably remind you of the Chinese Relativity Theorem:

      No matter how stupendous your triumphs, or how abject your defeats, there are always approximately two billion Chinese who couldn't give a fuck.

    2. Re:6.5 billion? What an idiot! by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      My thinking EXACTLY, Good Citizen objekt! Obviously, the kid can't be too smart if he hasn't yet realized that one waits until loooong after the onset of puberty before entering college. After all, the primary purpose of college is chancing up inebriated college babes (my apologies to all the sober, studious college women out there - but just shut the eff up...who asked you anyways.....)

    3. Re:6.5 billion? What an idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7 billion +- 3 billion ? Prove the number. Nobody has done an accurate head count of humans.

    4. Re:6.5 billion? What an idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was, "Even if you're a 1-in-a-million kind of guy, there are 6500 people just like you"

    5. Re:6.5 billion? What an idiot! by dnwq · · Score: 1

      This is, amazingly, an actual (and common!) Chinese proverb:

      No matter how strong you are, there is always someone stronger.

      An amazingly optimistic culture, eh?

    6. Re:6.5 billion? What an idiot! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of those are just objekts......not worth counting ;)

  82. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You should probably have left eligibility as a boolean; casting to int might imply something illegal.

    Not in Utah!

  83. I was about to post the same by tpjunkie · · Score: 1

    Those two paragraphs made me wince. The second paragraph in particular makes me wonder about what kind of "astrophysics" degree this kid even earned, especially considering the list of available courses someone posted earlier. Where is the class in QM that would provide framework to understand the theoretical underpinnings of an EPR bridge, which judging by his statement, he does not posses. Furthermore, as far as I am aware, most 4 year schools do not offer degrees in "astrophysics" anyway, one would major in physics or astronomy and then go to a PhD program for astrophysics, so the idea of a 2 year AA degree in astrophysics is kind of laughable.

  84. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Just a thought, but you might want to actually cast to uint instead....

  85. Purple prose... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't your mother ever teach you to not use a $20 word where a $5 word will do? ;)

    Nonsense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with improving the vocabulary of preliterate Slashdot readers, and the practice should be actively encouraged.

    We see far too much of the "This is Spot. See Spot run." type of narrative in most text these days (actively encouraged by MBAs with an excessive tendency towards Powerpointisation and the attention span of a flea), and there is no reason to apologise for enriching others' lives with interesting language.

    In fact, I would suggest that it would be beneficial to everybody to spend at least an hour or so every so often reading some really great poetry (John Donne comes uppermost in my mind, but whatever rocks one's boat). And no, I don't mean as part of any school curriculum (unless you want to): if it isn't done for "fun", there is absolutely no point in it.

    1. Re:Purple prose... by Thaelon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nonsense. There is absolutely nothing wrong with improving the vocabulary of preliterate Slashdot readers, and the practice should be actively encouraged.

      Malarkey.

      True genius is making the complicated seem trivial. This means writing as clearly as possible rather than trying for the highest scrabble word score.

      There's a time and a place for "waxing loquacious": Academic papers of predefined arbitrary lengths.

      Not normal conversation.

      --

      Question everything

    2. Re:Purple prose... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      True genius is making the complicated seem trivial. This means writing as clearly as possible rather than trying for the highest scrabble word score.

      There's a time and a place for "waxing loquacious": Academic papers of predefined arbitrary lengths.

      Not normal conversation.

      Sometimes a single longer word contains more meaningful connotations and overtones than a string of short words.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    3. Re:Purple prose... by k10quaint · · Score: 1

      Some things are irreducible to trivia (quantifying risk on structured financial instruments for example). The danger is when the "genius" reduces the complicated into trivia, and then puts our money or well being where his or her mouth is.

    4. Re:Purple prose... by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a time and a place for "waxing loquacious": Academic papers of predefined arbitrary lengths.

      That's absurd. With a large enough vocabulary, a writer can express thoughts precisely, and with fewer words.

    5. Re:Purple prose... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      True genius is making the complicated seem trivial. This means writing as clearly as possible rather than trying for the highest scrabble word score.

      The real problem is today, people sacrifice accuracy for clarity. Yeah, it almost means the same thing, but it's technically wrong. So is it better for people to get the general idea, or to hear the correct answer? I'd go for accuracy, and let then ask if they don't understand. Unfortunately, asking questions isn't allowed in our society, so here we are...

    6. Re:Purple prose... by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      In theory, you are correct. However, when you start working context and intended audience into the equation, things start looking less black and white. If, for example, you lapse into flowery dialectic gilded with temerarious antipathy for the grasping plebiate masses, you should be kicked in the dick. It is entirely possible, and entirely a-OK to understand words without using them. We're not devolving into the simple English Wikipedia out here in the real world - on the contrary, comprehension levels are better now than they've ever been, it's just that the proletariat never had the ability to publish - before now.

      The measure of a man is not always in his words.

    7. Re:Purple prose... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Gaddagaddagamigamshalook, right?

      --
      It's been a long time.
    8. Re:Purple prose... by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      You'd be going for precision, not accuracy. Subtle but important difference.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    9. Re:Purple prose... by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      It's a bad idea there too. No aspiring young researcher would dream of using a short word if a longer one means just the same. Method becomes methodology, near becomes approximate, and just about every verbal insanity is tried as long as Word's grammar check won't complain. If anything, Orwell under-stated the problem in his essay Politics and the English Language. The situation has gotten much worse.

    10. Re:Purple prose... by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      actively encouraged by MBAs with an excessive tendency towards Powerpointisation and the attention span of a flea

      Strong though he was, young Aniken could not withstand the Powerpoint of the Dark Side.

      Infinite Cosmic Powerpoint!

      There are two kinds of Powerpoint slides. Those that say far too little, and those that say far too much.

      What it's meant to be is wallpaper for people to stare at while you insert messages into their brains while they're not paying attention.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    11. Re:Purple prose... by chuck · · Score: 1

      True genius is making the complicated seem trivial. This means writing as clearly as possible rather than trying for the highest scrabble word score.

      There's a time and a place for "waxing loquacious": Academic papers of predefined arbitrary lengths.

      Not normal conversation.

      Then you would probably enjoy The Theory of Relativity In Words of Four Letters or Less:

      http://www.muppetlabs.com/~breadbox/txt/al.html

    12. Re:Purple prose... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      Using flowery language for its own sake is fine, but that's poetry, not a sincere attempt at conveying meaning. Use the simplest word that accurately encapsulates your thought. That way it reaches a wider audience and frees up mental resources to focus on what you mean. Not to mention that using more complicated language usually changes the meaning of what your saying.

      OTOH, if you don't want someone to understand what you mean then using complicated language is perfect. Examples include politicians and people that think using long words makes them sound smart.

    13. Re:Purple prose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but removing complication is not the same as choosing the shorter word - longer words can be clearer and more precise, or remove ambiguity for words with mixed meanings (or intentionally add them). The reason that academic papers have longer words in general is because the precision they allow is more necessary than in most casual conversations. Granted fun with word play was the goal rather than more precision here, but I would put the original poster's remarks at maybe a high school level vocabulary. Not great for a non-native speaker I'll grant, but probably a larger vocabulary is probably easier to deal with than keeping up with the ever expanding meme literacy requirements.

    14. Re:Purple prose... by samcan · · Score: 1

      I prefer to look at the English language as a precise lexicon. Each word has a precise meaning, that is, gigantic is smaller than huge (this can depend on which dictionary one uses). Writing then becomes like computer programming: Each word is a tool, used for a precise purpose. Just as one does not use a screwdriver as a hammer, one does not use "feline," when the target audience clearly demands the term "cat," or "pussycat." One does not use BASIC for writing CGI scripts, just as one does not use Perl for writing MS-DOS programs from 1995.

    15. Re:Purple prose... by samcan · · Score: 1

      True. One can be precise, but wrong.

    16. Re:Purple prose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not, because I've gotten my relatives to qualitatively understand relativity (not the math behind it), and I am far from a genius.

      But, I could just be defensive because I like to be very concise with my language, meaning that I use big and unpopular terms when they fit well. Or maybe I really am a genius. And conceited. Hmph, I'll have to think about that.

    17. Re:Purple prose... by bronney · · Score: 1

      That is true. However, depending on who the writer is writing for, the audience might just "meh" and go to sleep. I don't know how slashdot fits into this though.

    18. Re:Purple prose... by Qeyser · · Score: 1

      I'd go farther and say that clear writing is especially desirable in academic papers. When you're trying to communicate complex, abstract ideas, why make the prose any more complex and abstract than it needs to be?

      BrokenHalo makes a good point about Improving Our Word Power, but I think writers benefit less from a good vocabulary than they do from good editing skills -- and the willingness to rewrite, revise, and edit until their prose is crisp, clean, direct, and clear.

    19. Re:Purple prose... by OrigamiMarie · · Score: 1

      But normal people won't read the writings. It doesn't matter how precisely it is written if most people would have to look up every fifth word. That may be precise, but it is not efficient.

    20. Re:Purple prose... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Spoken like a true hater of language. A non-artist. Lacking in love of beauty. I suppose Tolkien is shitty for using the word "elf" when "humanoid with pointy ears and a heightened understanding of nature" is just dandy?

    21. Re:Purple prose... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which only highlights the overall illiteracy of the population.

    22. Re:Purple prose... by dreamsofcaffeine · · Score: 1

      In fact, I would suggest that it would be beneficial to everybody to spend at least an hour or so every so often reading some really great poetry (John Donne comes uppermost in my mind, but whatever rocks one's boat). And no, I don't mean as part of any school curriculum (unless you want to): if it isn't done for "fun", there is absolutely no point in it.

      Yeah, what about also using a fuckton of loanwords? Vous me pourriez donner salem, please? Just the same as ``Could you please hand me the salt?'' (with the possible grammatical exception of wrong French, because French's a shitty language), but much harder to understand for average Joe, because that's 3 fucking languages in one fucking sentence. (Be happy that it's short enough for me not to use German, because then I'd have made that sentence run a paragraph.) Having a big vocabulary is all great 'n stuff, but it doesn't score with anyone who wants to understand you without using a fucking dictionary.

      Oh, and did you notice how common forms of the word `fuck' are? `Fuck''s a fucking useful word, y'know, and people want to fucking censor it, even though it's probably the only word which is understood by pretty much anyone on the fucking planet.

    23. Re:Purple prose... by u38cg · · Score: 1
      And yet, what better word is there for loquacity? Language is powerful, powerful stuff - to adduce it removes the precision, clarity, and poise you so heartily recommend. Good writers do indeed value neatness of expression, but not at the cost of emasculating their vocabulary.

      Western culture is in an intellectual race to the bottom. Frankly, I think we desperately need a better educated citizenry - a generation ago, every politician was as thoughtful as Obama. Now we're lucky if they have any sort of grasp of science and culture at all.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    24. Re:Purple prose... by Fiztaru · · Score: 1

      No offense...but given what passes for 'normal conversation' in the bulk of American society these days, I'd be happy to "'wax loquacious'", as you so deftly put it, with anyone intelligent enough to do likewise. Simplicity is becoming a defense for the lazy.

      --
      In good speaking, should not the mind of the speaker know the truth of the matter about which he is to speak? - Plato
  86. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by KefabiMe · · Score: 1

    Social peers is all to often a nice waying of saying "hang out with the half wits". There is a lot of value being put on "functioning well in groups" that for certain people mean they get to learn that they really don't want to be part of any group that they haven't selected for themselves.

    Why do you gotta be a dick? Do you get to choose who is around you at all times? Probably not. Knowing how to interact with other people is not a useless skill.

    All those "half wits" may not have the scientific and technical knowledge you have, but at least they aren't assholes. Everyone has specialized and does something much better than you can I'm sure. If I want to have a thoughtful political or scientific discussion, a Slashdot member would be great for that. If I wanted a crew mate on a fishing boat? Someone to help build a house? Someone to help me realize that I spend way too much time on the computer and that there's a shitload more shit to do before I die? I'd rather take a "half wit" than you!

  87. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by lwsimon · · Score: 1

    But its not true - there are some people who, by their own choices and actions, are genuinely worthless.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  88. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Was it a nice robe? :)

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  89. bye bye middle schools hello college by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it just proves how messed up our schools are. I remember a lot of bright kids growing up trying to ask complex things and teachers just telling them to go sit in the corner and have a cookie. Young kids are sponges who should be encouraged

  90. Oblig Big Bang Reference by mordred99 · · Score: 1

    Funny if his name was Sheldon Cooper

  91. Exactly! by Attack+DAWWG · · Score: 1

    And yet, the GP gets modded up.

    He ended his post with "How typical." You know what's not typical nowadays? Modesty, honesty, and respect.

    You know what is typical? Going on talk radio, FOX News, Slashdot, or another Internet forum and screaming your head off about "Political Correctness."

    1. Re:Exactly! by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know what's not typical nowadays? Modesty, honesty, and respect.

      So, let's see, here...

      Modesty? You want everyone, at every level of capability or regardless of how much work they've put into what they do, to be considered equal? You think that kids should receive accolades for showing up, rather than for busting their asses and actually doing something? You think that the kids who do nothing but Wii all day should be held in the same esteem as a kid who racks up a degree in astrophysics by age eleven? This isn't about the kid with the brains and dedication, you idiot. It's about all of the average or sub-average kids who are being told the lie that they are already just as smart as he is. Which does nothing but distort their view of the world, and undermine any sense of urgency they might have to better themselves and get ready for real work in their lives - the better to be able to take it all in stride and thrive. It's not about the eleven year old graduate's modesty or lack of it. It's about the vaporware foundation for the self esteem that all of his lazier counterparts are being propped up on (only to come crashing down, later).

      Honesty? Do you really think it's honest to tell all of this hard working kid's peers that they're all just as smart as he is? To diminish what he's done by telling all of those kids that hard, difficult work really doesn't matter and that everyone is the same... and that everyone should get the same outcome in their lives regardless of whether they hustle and study and work hard and focus, or not? Is that honestly how you think the world should be? Everyone gets the same of everything, no matter how hard they're willing to work, how well they teach themselves to focus on a task, and no matter how inspired they are, compared to everyone else?

      Respect? Yeah, I can tell you have a lot of respect for the kid that did the hard work, here. You want to make sure that nobody else feels bad for not, themselves having a degree in astrophysics at eleven years old. I suppose that your own way of showing respect would be to now give those out to all of the other eleven year olds in the neighborhood, so none of them feel bad about having no idea what such a degree even represents? Way to respect the other eleven year olds, there. Make sure they go into life completely confused about what gets them from point A to point B. Disarm them of any critical thinking skills. Very respectful of you.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Exactly! by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      You have a gift with words. It's almost like we can see the spittle on your monitor!

    3. Re:Exactly! by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have a gift with words. It's almost like we can see the spittle on your monitor!

      And you have an interesting way of avoiding the substance of the matter. Which, actually, is quite in keeping with your earlier comment - so, I suppose that's fitting. All comments are of equal substance! Every comment is just as smart, in its own way, as any other! I can't believe how subtle and clever you are, making your point that way. Of course we're all just as clever, in our own ways, so I guess you're nothing special. Or are you? I guess we're all extraordinary! I think everyone should get tenure, a Nobel Prize, and a cabinet position in the new administration, just for showing up.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Replying anonimousy since I have moderated this discussion....

      There is a tremendous difference between being modest and humble, and refusing to recognize excellence in others. I think your reaction confuses these concepts. One can understand that one is unusual in some way regarding talent and still say that this, in itself, is nothing special. This means that he should be recognized for his ability, dedication, discipine, etc. but that it is admirable that despite this, he is STILL willing to entertain the possibility that any other individual may be substantially better at something than he is.

    5. Re:Exactly! by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      he is STILL willing to entertain the possibility that any other individual may be substantially better at something than he is

      Sure. But he actually asserts that "each one is" (emphasis mine). That's the part that chafes. It's wishful thinking that, said out loud, won't impact his life at all, but will impact the lives of people who will uncomfortably discover - when they get to their first job - that at least some of what their mom and their junior high school social studies teacher said to them about how very special they personally are ... is quite possibly BS. Knowing that you don't have a magic Shield O' Specialness around you, no matter how much your grandmother seems to imply that that's the case, can be an important part of realizing the need to actually pursue and develop some actual specialness before you're too far along in life. Why short circuit that process of coming to terms with that reality by assuring everyone that they're magically unique and just as smart (in their own way!) as an unusually bright student who's truly a one in a million sort of kid?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    6. Re:Exactly! by Sj0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, your idea of modesty is wrong. In this case, the definition of modesty is "the quality of being modest; freedom from vanity, boastfulness, etc.", or the opposite of bravado. This is not the same as forced equality. You can still be completely awesome. It doesn't mean you need to be a vain boastful dick about it.

      Don't worry about the mix-up though. I just caught it because I'm smarter than you.

      --
      It's been a long time.
    7. Re:Exactly! by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."

      This line is actually very clever. Everybody works hard and everybody succeeds at something. There will always be someone smarter than him and for them to recognize his success, he will have to acknowledge the successes of those who aren't necessarily as accomplished as he is. How many physics books do you think he is reading that were written by people that officially began their careers at 11?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
  92. OK ok ok ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to knock this kid's accomplishments. I took a summer class years ago as an undergrad at my local community college in FL. Our instructor for an Am History class was also a 6th grade teacher. Her class was probably the worst higher education course I have taken in my life. She treated us like 6th graders, she had us read from a text book, and she had us memorize questions and answers for multiple choice tests. This was a huge departure from what I was accustomed to. It was a missed opportunity to really debate historical events and explore the nuances of past conflicts. The content was not difficult and was completely accessible to a 6th grader. I could, however, imagine a 6th grader struggling with completing assignments on time, etc. A diligent parent or a dedicated learner could have definitely licked that class.

    Are the things taught in college really that difficult or do they just require maturity to be able to meet the requirements of the class?

  93. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by DomNF15 · · Score: 1

    There are apparently different IQ tests, and the raw scores can't really be compared - the percentile you fall in is more important than the raw score: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensa_International

  94. MENSA is for idiots by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

    I believe MENSA requires an IQ of 160 or higher. Of course, IQ tests are retarded - the younger you are the higher your score, for the same performance.

    This is why you get a lot of stories about "genius" kids and toddlers, when in fact, they're just above-average with parents who got them tested.

    I wouldn't join MENSA, I know too many idiots there.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  95. budget concerns by Tim4444 · · Score: 1

    It's a trial program for cutting costs. Handing out PhD's to 11 year olds will let California get rid of all those expensive underperforming middle schools and high schools.

  96. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    com'on now, dont you get 30 points automaticlly for writting your name? Maybe an extra 10 if you spell it correctly....

    No, that's on the SATs. IQ tests are different.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  97. he was lucky... by whopub · · Score: 0

    he managed to accomplish that before discovering masturbation.

    ...

    Or girls (in case someone outside the slashdot community reads this...)

  98. 2 words.... by kernel+panic+attack · · Score: 1

    Doogie Hawking

  99. There is something profoundly true about what he s by microbox · · Score: 1

    It's also an incredibly shallow triumph of an Olympic grade platitudinous pandering politically correct aphorism. The kid's teacher says he can "see right through the complications," but he's still been brainwashed into thinking that he's not unusual. What a shame. And how typical.


    There is something profoundly true about what he said - it cuts to the inherent vulnerability of the human condition, and shows extraordinary social intelligence. Perhaps he can see through more complications than you give him credit for.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  100. Michael Kearney by Theovon · · Score: 1

    Turns out, I'm "related" to Michael Kearney, indirectly through two marriages. My parents have met him.

    (And my hair dresser's roommate's grandmother's bingo partner's boyfriend once sat next to Steve Jobs in an airport during a layover. That makes me special too.)

  101. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by omnichad · · Score: 1

    That was hilarious. I apologize for not having mod points. I'm so, so sorry. hahaha.

  102. Re:There is something profoundly true about what h by ScentCone · · Score: 1

    shows extraordinary social intelligence

    Which means what, exactly? That he's a quick study when it comes to what seems to go over well among the adults in his academic life? That he's acutely aware of which platitudes will be received with smiles, and cause little friction? Yes, that's handy. But it's also a fundamental part of what holds so many average kids back from being excellent in anything. When all they hear from kids who should be role models is that they are already just as smart as the junior astrophysicist, then what's the point of getting to the bottom of the work ethic, discipline, and drive of such a student, and emulating it? No need! We're all already just as smart as him, in our own way! OMG!Let's go fire up WoW!

    --
    Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
  103. There must be a mistake.. by PortHaven · · Score: 1

    Maybe they mean he wants to go to college for astrophysics.

    He's graduating from a community college. Which usually means a 2-yr degree. I do not believe you can get an astrophysics degree in a 2-yr program from a community college. Also, most would argue that an associates is not really what people mean by a college degree.

    I have an Associates in Computer Science. But I think few would accept me claiming to be a college graduate. It's like dropping out in the 10th grade and claiming you graduated high school.

    I am not trying to knock the kids achievements. Just think the story is misleading and premature. Come back to me in 2 yrs when he graduates with a BS degree.

  104. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by amoeba1911 · · Score: 2, Funny

    you should have disrobed.

  105. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

    And when he finally comes around to the reality of the world - that there ARE worthless, stupid people - he will be just as disillusioned as the person who was told that they were indeed special, unique, and superior when they find out that it's not so.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  106. Video games? Not me, they don't help humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Videogames? They're a waste of time! They don't help humanity in any way, shape, or fashion. Not me, I'm a big kid, I don't sit on my duff while distracting myself with pretty, distracting stimuli while other people are out there fighting cancer or developing technologies that make peoples' lives better!

    Now excuse me while I play Mozart on my piano and win another karate trophy.

  107. Re:There is something profoundly true about what h by microbox · · Score: 1
    Hi, There's something very interesting about what I said, and how you responded. If you are really interested in the "extraordinary social intelligence" bit, then you need to understand some theory about the human condition. We're all arm-chair philosophers, and this kid is too. So why do I think what he said is so smart? Well, it takes a *long* time for us arm-chair philosophers to understand people and society - part of the reason why Eastern cultures place so much emphasis on wisdom and old age. Consider the following theories:

    Either the kid is parroting, or he's plain smart. He doesn't see himself as entitled to imposing his ego or style on others (narcissim). He knows that people will compare themselves to him (social comparison theory), and that that's a delicate situation for others. He doesn't want to make other's feel inferior (interpersonal circumplex). It's not someone else's /fault/ that they don't have your gifts. By treating this matter delicately, he can inspire others - bring out their best. He might just be repeating a platitude, or he might understand something that we should all understand.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  108. Re:Chris Rock on Community college? by fuzzylollipop · · Score: 1

    to quote Chris Rock, "community college is like a disco with books!"

  109. I CALL B.S. from the Parents by simaolation · · Score: 1

    You see this way too often from over zealous parents. I took a ton of community college courses while in high school (in the mornings) from the best ranked community college in California and let me tell you, the standards and depth of material as well as overall peer competition is so low that I am absolutely certain I could have graduated from a community college in 11 with a C or B- average. This kid is definitely extremely bright to manage a perfect GPA even in "East Los Angeles Community College" and to know what he wants to do so early, and not want to be a ...neurosurgeon unlike all those National Spelling Bee champions. Basically, the scheme is this 1)Bug teachers like crazy until they relent and let your kid take some easy standardized test to skip 2-3 grades in the period of 60 minutes. 2)Bug some poor, no-name community college administrator like crazy (hours on the phone, personal meetings) until they let your kid start taking a few classes. 3)Once your kid actually passes those classes, bug the administrator some more until he decides to let your kid enroll full time. 4)After your kid graduate from community college, tell local media who loves this kind of sensation stories, and also tell local media your kid is the next einstein with plans to save the world from AIDS, the energy crisis, and Microsoft (okay, that's a joke). 5)Use the media frenzy as bargaining chip for elite private (Ivy league) colleges who loves to have media attention and national spot light and are more than willing to accomodate this little genius to promote themselves all over the country ("we enroll geniuses: future astrophysicists AND brain surgeons!!!") ... 10)New houses for son and parents. Of course, between steps 1-5, I'm not sure the kid gets much input except in terms of what color laptop he'll get for college. These parents here are at least considerate in not forcing their kid to be another brain surgeon. For the Chinese mother, I congratulate her for letting her mathematically-gifted son to pursue a field which actually uses math.

    1. Re:I CALL B.S. from the Parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may or may not have a B.S. The article isn't about them, it's about their son getting an A.S. ;)

  110. His degree should be in politics by hessian · · Score: 1

    "I don't consider myself a genius because there are 6.5 billion people in this world and each one is smart in his or her own way."

    The guys driving around me on the freeway today are not geniuses. Not everyone is smart. Deal with it and stop flattering the crowd.

  111. Re:The word you are looking for: by steelfood · · Score: 1

    Mouthfuls.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  112. *That* of all things? by xant · · Score: 1

    Really, that made your blood boil? A kid who's smart enough to be diplomatic about his talents?

    Incidentally, I agree with him. I am pretty well-regarded in my field, but I've yet to meet any single adult who was dumber than I am about absolutely everything. People have their talents, their brains absorb the input those brains are given, and they derive a certain expertise about those things. He's good at astrophysics, I bet he sucks at raising a baby.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
  113. Sigh by Endo13 · · Score: 1

    There's not much to go on to really get an idea about the kid as a person. No way to really tell if he's well-rounded or not. In my experience though, with the few of his comments that *are* quoted in TFA I'd have to say he's probably a stuck-up condescending jackass. Hopefully that's not true, and like I said there's not much to go on.

    Looking at the comment (paraphrased) "I don't consider myself to be exceptionally smart because there's 6.5 billion people in the world, and they're all smart!... in their own way". Obviously we can't see his face when he said that, or hear his tone, but that statement is just dripping with condescension. People who make that comment usually make it because they believe they're so much better than "those other people" that those other people will never realize just how untrue it actually is, so they can get away with it. The interesting part about it is what he said actually is more or less true. (Perfect example is Bill Watterson. Totally sucked at math and science, but possibly the most brilliant comic strip writer ever.) I honestly hope I'm wrong, and that he actually believes what he said.

    But then there's his comment about video games. Do I really need to say more?

    What it really boils down to is the kid enjoys studying. Video games aren't fun for him. I'd guess most social activities really aren't either. He did what he enjoyed, pure and simple. He's just lucky that what he enjoys also happens to be things that will prove more beneficial down the road than the things most kids enjoy.

    --
    There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
  114. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by jd · · Score: 1

    The more I read about humans, the more I think the cat lady has a point. (I'm in the top 2%, but I doubt many Slashdotters would consider me a genius. A fruitcake, perhaps...)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  115. Oh dear God! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    What an insufferable little snotnose!

    With a "made up" associates degree from a questionable institution. You wonder if his educational needs are really being met or if his "stage parents" are just using him for gratuitous ego stroking.

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  116. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

    By the way, most preteens don't have the emotional maturity to succeed in a "normal" college social environment.

    So? Most preteens don't have the emotional maturity to succeed in middle school, yet that's where he'd be if he followed the traditional schedule. And for someone so far ahead of his "peers" to go to such a school would pretty much guarantee that he won't fit in. From my personal experiences, I'd say he has the same or even better chance of social success in jr. college vs. jr. high.

  117. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Alarindris · · Score: 1

    I read your comment over and over, and I honestly don't understand what your point is. Could you clarify?

  118. somebody should do a study on what happens by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    to all these child prodigies

    i'm certain a few become millionaires or well respected academics. but i wonder how many wind up heroin addicts or working in food service. for every wolfram or yo yo ma or tiger woods there are a whole host of burn outs

    you always hear about these stellar rises, then... nothing

    you burden these kids with humongous egos and humongous expectations, its really more of a handicap than a gift

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  119. Story headline should be by bobKali · · Score: 1

    East Los Angeles Community College astrophysics curriculum easy enough for an 11 year old to complete.

    He probably is a smart kid, but I think that this story says more about the (apparent) sad state of the East Los Angeles Community College than it says good about this 11 year old.

  120. Just give it a few weeks... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    "But why can't he be an evil genius? The world needs more evil geniuses so that we can get more super heroes."

    He'll get there, just be patient. This is someone who has yet to hit puberty, but every one of his peers will easily be 2-4x his age. That makes it kind of tricky to get laid when you have no one to gain experience with accessible to help sort out all those awkward emotions... particularly the stuff you can't just explain in words alone.

    This kid will probably become something like that "Syndrome" guy from "The Incredibles", only fueled by sexual ambiguity and frustration.

    Even if this kid is smart enough to decide not to skip out on playtime with kids his own age, he'll still be seen as a freak for being "different".

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
  121. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I co-taught a 1 credit college course in 6th grade in robotics. It only happened because the right administrator spotted me; other than that, I was held down or ignored the whole time in the school system.
    Plenty of mental blocks were placed as well... still have some of them. I had a normal progression and I still didn't fit in with my peers so it wouldn't have made a difference if I was in a system that allowed such things. I was encouraged to do more normal kid things-- wish I did even more than I did. You are only a kid once and can never go back; when you put in the focus required to advance like that you not only need optimal conditions (as with any speed run) but you have to grow up in ways that will come soon enough naturally and maintaining a narrow focus at a critical time in one's development. I am glad I wasn't pushed and just glided bye with a somewhat normal experience.

    Perhaps that 11 year old will hit puberty and slow down like the rest of us did?

  122. Evil Medical School by bobbuck · · Score: 1

    But why can't he be an evil genius?

    Because he didn't spend 6 years in evil medical school. Duh!
    (Not to assume that he won't...)

  123. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    130
    -70
    ===
    sum: 60

    so, average or mean is 60 / 2 = 30. OOPS.

  124. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and get -40 points for misspelling "writing" and "automatically".

  125. How do you skip grades? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've always wondered how kids get to skip grades. How does one proclaim to be too smart to be bothered with sitting through second grade? What role/compulsion do the parents have in all of this?

    I could only imagine what school would be like if all kids could opt to do all their work for the year up-front and then get to either take the rest of the year off or start next years work if they get done early.

    Needless to say there would be quite a number of students finishing high school much earlier and or enjoying much longer summer vacations.

  126. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dipshit, Youg kitd have made it at major Universities at very young ages especially before your cultural elitism became PC.

    Who cares if he

    (a) wants to study

    (b) is too ___stupid___ to worry about you, idiot, not liking him

    (c) is too busy to waste time with pot, or chase tail all day

    The only sense in which your comment has any meaning is that it does not take University, great or small to learn, only imagination and a good teacher to answer questions.

    In the US today you are all bemused by failing "systems" most devised by those who do not understand the problem, wake up, and get real otherwise you will find yourself a third world country ever so soon.

  127. What a complete joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to be knee-jerk critical or anything, but this really isn't that impressive. Have any of you (those of you who've gotten a science degree from a good college, that is) ever actually taken science/calculus at a community college? It's a complete joke. I guarantee he would learn more if he'd just gone to a private prep school. If he ever winds up going to a real university (and by 'real' I mean Caltech, not CSU Northridge), his CC experience will mean exactly nothing - it won't even be useful. Community colleges have to teach to the level of their students, and the fact of the matter is that CC's are filled with morons. There is zero chance that the average 18-year-old at a CC can handle the physics that's taught at MIT. I'm not trying to be elitist, it's just a fact. I have personal experience - I ran out of math & science classes to take in high school and so took some physics classes (mechanics and E&M) at my local CSU campus during my senior year of high school. The next year I went to a top (MIT/Caltech) university as a physics major - it might as well have not even have been the same subject. In fact, I would say the CSU classes put me at a slight disadvantage because they gave me the false illusion of knowledge. CC would be even worse. All that kid learned were a few rote skills. I'm sure he knows that the derivative of x^2 is 2x and that's all. I guarantee that if you dropped him into an upper (or even lower) division mechanics class at a reasonable college he'd just puke. CC is a complete waste of time, if his parents had anything on the ball they would have been able to find a dozen more-productive things for him to do.

    Any reasonably bright (top 5%) kid who likes math would be able to do what this kid did. All this story is is a symptom of bad parenting.

  128. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by mqduck · · Score: 1

    I thought genius was defined as something like an IQ in the 98th percentile or higher.

    Defined as something like an IQ in the 98th percentile according to who? The word "genius" is a lot older than IQ tests.

    (and IQ is a bullshit concept anyway, but that's another matter. *throws away karma*)

    --
    Property is theft.
  129. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by mqduck · · Score: 1

    Being different in school SUCKS ASS. [...] Social peers is all to often a nice waying of saying "hang out with the half wits".

    And, with that, you prove that you had as much to do with defining yourself as "different" as your peers did (or that you both played a part... you know what I mean). You internalized their scorn, transformed it, and made it your own, a powerful and perhaps necessary defense mechanism (I did it too). But you're all grown up now, high school is over. Let's get over such negative thinking about ourselves and others.

    --
    Property is theft.
  130. All paths lead to solitude by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Telling people how much smarter you are than them is a good way to ensure you spend Friday night in the basement playing video games.

    If he's that much smarter than the Average Joe (IMO he definitely is), he'll probably find that he's totally alien to most people and end up gaming alone in the basement in his spare time anyways, although he may want some of the benefits he can gain by putting up a facade of interest as he gets older...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  131. Offering to humanity? by Optimus6128 · · Score: 1

    He doesn't like videogames because he says they offer nothing to humanity, yet he wants to be an actor?

    And since when all we do has to do anything with offering something to humanity? I think we want to say that it is so, they call you an egoist if you deny this, or sometimes it's a byproduct of that, but it's all personal motives for me.

    --
    The "H-Word" has died for me.
  132. meme-time by csrster · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new Jewish-Asian Hybrid Overlords.

  133. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    I thought genius was defined as something like an IQ in the 98th percentile or higher.

    So out of every 100 people you pass on the street, 2 are geniuses?

  134. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    Out of curiosity, why did you join MENSA? I'm eligible, but I've never joined because I thought it was just a bunch of people who want to pretend they're special because they scored high on an intelligence/aptitude test.

  135. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by iamhigh · · Score: 1

    I always took those at home IQ test and always scored about 99 percentile on those. I just wanted to see if I truly was in the top 2%. I have, as many other members, never attended any function. If it were not for the MENSA Bulletin, and the chat groups I might not renew. But MENSA also does some good for the community. And in this age of smart!=cool, I think just supporting a group of people not afraid to "own" their intelligence is nice.

    --
    No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
  136. I don't know if this means anything? by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    But I guess I'm a little older. When I was 11 I could walk and chew chewing gum at the same time. When I was 11 I could light firecrackers without blowing my fingers off. When I was 11 I was trusted with a 22 rifle. When I was 11......

    Go here:
      |
      |
      |
      V

  137. Ist here a real one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The imaginary square root of -1?

    Ist here a real one?

    Sometimes slashdot is just to complex for me.

  138. Not quite by davidwr · · Score: 1

    So out of every 100 people you pass on the street, 2 are geniuses?

    Um, not quite.

    The smart ones stay off the street.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Not quite by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Then to rephrase to avoid your idiotic parsing of my question: So 2 out of 100 people in the world are geniuses?

  139. Hyper fast advancement through school by samwhite_y · · Score: 1

    I always wonder what the parents are thinking when they push their kid through the entire K-12-BA school system at such a fast rate. Do they really believe that the kid is better set up for life at that point then if they were to take their time and send the kid to a better college where the kid would get an early exposure to professors who are leaders in research in their respective fields? Better yet, have the kid skip out on the normal curriculum and find some more challenging instructional texts that the kid can do with remote supervision by a professor at a local college.

    There is a quote that I remember from one of my professors in college. When talking about a particularly bright kid, he said "that kid is sufficiently bright that our classes and curriculum are more of a hindrance than an aid". The implication is that accomplishing a BA degree is many times more about grinding through material than something that shows a real difference between those who are truly educated than those who are not. I can still remember Jay Leno's "Jay Walks" where he would ask college graduates questions that many (admittedly unusually smart) 12 year old kids (still not in high school) without a BA could answer easily.

    I have read enough biographies of those who end up with great achievements in their fields (Einstein and Newton being good examples). Almost none of them had abnormally accelerated the normal learning track. They almost always just side-stepped it. For example, in his teen age years Einstein was thinking thoughts that only specialized masters of those fields would be able to fully comprehend. Did his track record in school reflect this? No. (And if you follow Newton as a model, then you should force your child to be a farmer for a while so that they really will do anything they can to avoid that fate).

  140. Re:Not a genius? He probably is. by lavalamp70 · · Score: 1

    retarded is -70? Whew! I'm safe...

  141. Yes by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If genius is defined as being in the top 2% intellectually, which is how some people define it. Mensa allows the top 2% into its little club.

    Others are more selective, limiting it to the top 1% or less.

    Still others don't rely on IQ-based intelligence as the sole or even primary defining quality of genius.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  142. Maybe the Board of Education encourages this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She might be doing it to satisfy the Board of Education. I know in Australia at least, the NSW Board of Education mandates that students watch and analyse movies as part of the English curriculum. The teacher in question may very well deplore the state of reading in her class, yet be forced to offer a whole host of drivel as part of the Board of Education requirements.

  143. Proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Video of him: http://www.foxnews.com/video2/video08.html?maven_referralObject=6009088&maven_referralPlaylistId=&sRevUrl=http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,526348,00.html?mrp

    I'm proud of him. I think that even though it was only community college, he is determined to go to a 4 year college and at the rate he's going, he'll do just fine. And, I'm glad he doesn't see himself as unusual. After all, the kids he took the test with were the ones reminding him that he was different.
    He'll go far and I hope no one stops him.