Slashdot Mirror


The Worst US Cities To Work In IT

bdcny7927 writes with an excerpt from CIO.com to inspire some caution before your next job switch: "IT workers have their choice of many great US cities for work and play (Atlanta, Chicago, Seattle), but what are the cities that you probably should avoid? Here's a very unscientific, highly subjective and unapologetically snarky list of our least favorite US tech job locales."

538 comments

  1. Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay, I don't really believe that. I just always wanted to see what that sentence looked like in print.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Skreems · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was surprised to see Atlanta on the "good" list myself.

      --
      Slashdot needs a "-1, Wrong" moderation option.
      The Urban Hippie
    2. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow... I'm from Detroit and I laughed so hard when I read that. When people ask me what I thought about my time there I always tell them that "Detroit is a great place to be" then pause a minute and add "from."

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    3. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to love driving around Belle Isle at night watching the police trolling the Detroit River for headless torsos...

    4. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stillpixel · · Score: 0

      If you believe all the Tim Allen narrated Michigan commercials on TV lately you'd think Michigan is the best place on Earth.. but then I saw the GM building at the end of the commercial and had to give a Homer Simpson "DOH!" I worked in Sacramento / Folsom , CA and now in the D.C. / Baltimore area all in all about the same, but you always have low ball employers out there who will overwork you for slave pay.

    5. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My reaction has always been that any place that needs to advertise that it is a good place to work/live/start a business is probably a horrible place to work/live/start a business

    6. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      And Boston made it to both lists.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    7. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it is. That's why I live in Tampa now. :)

    8. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "I was surprised to see Atlanta on the "good" list myself."

      Well, out of the top '3' they listed, I'd have to pick it.

      I couldn't live with the weather they get up there in the northern cities in the US. WAY too freakin' cold for me too long out of the year.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Altus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yea, but seriously, Boston is a bad place to live because the sports teams win? That's pretty fucking weak.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    10. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh boy, a list! Nothing's better to drum up page views and elicit reader comments like a list!

    11. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by gr8_phk · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sure, they show a picture of some crappy neighborhood in the city. Just north, Oakland county is one of the richest in the nation. The other suburbs are just fine too. Let's set Detroit aside for a moment and consider Michigan in general. Some points:
      1) We've got more coastline than California - and it's fresh water.
      2) We've got 4 seasons (which is good or bad depending on your preference).
      3) More second homes than any other state (most on the water).
      4) We've don't get earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, termites, poisonous spiders/snakes.
      5) We do get the occasional tornado, but far less than most of the midwest.
      6) Education: we've got plenty of geek-schools.
      7) Manufacturing. Does anyone care? We can build anything here - tech included
      8) We've got an enormous set of technically capable people just waiting for companies to set up shop here.
      Outside the 139 square miles of Detroit, Michigan is a paradise compared to a lot of places.

    12. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by TheJorge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a commuter who rides the train that feeds Fenway, I can say that's a major detriment. Nothing like 30 minutes in a packed train with sweaty drunk fans to end your day in the office 2-3 times a week.

    13. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      you must not live down here.

      IT job opportunities are awesome, and unless you want to buy a house Inside the perimeter, renting is cheap if you shop around. I pay $580 in Brookhaven per month. Unless you plan on gaining more than 1000 dollars a month in interest off your house, even a modest 140k is a waste of money (and you'll be well outside the city limits)

      Yep, I'm having a good time saving a thousand dollars per month month while co-workers shell out 1500+ for a mortgage they probably won't see a thousand dollar a month return on. I have no idea why this country is so fixated on purchasing a house.

    14. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what you get for commuting on the green line.

    15. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They point out the high real estate prices (legit point) but they are high because everyone wants to live here.

      If he doesn't like all those winning teams then I'm surprised he didn't also take a shot about having too many good schools (Harvard, MIT, BU, BC, etc).

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    16. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by eldorel · · Score: 1

      Not sure about other areas, but my mortgage on a 4 bedroom house is the same monthly as rent on my old 2 bedroom apartment in an "ok" area.

      Since buying my house it's value has increased by about 8%. That's not including the improvements i'm doing either.

      So, I can either throw money down the rental hole while putting up with crappy neighbors, or I can invest in a place that eventually can be sold for as much or more than I paid for it.

      Easy question for me.

      The nice thing about real estate is that it usually keeps up with inflation. As long as you buy the house for what it's actually worth you are pretty much guaranteed to get your money back if you wait long enough.

    17. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That should be Michigan's new state motto "Aside from Detroit, we're great!" ;-)

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by winomonkey · · Score: 1

      Hey, we all know that it's cold in the D ... so cold in the D.

    19. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but it says "for work and play." I had to actually go look at the actual article (almost unheard of, I know) to verify they actually said that.

      Honestly... what exactly is there for a family to do in Atlanta? Or am I missing something?

      Yes, I know... we've got a second rate zoo, second rate Aquarium, even our theme park is second rate. Besides, how often can you take the kids to the zoo?

      Hiking at Stone Mtn is OK, but they ruined everything else there.

      In fact, I get this feeling about a lot of large cities... there's some tourist attractions, but there's really not this panacea of activities in any large city. I guess Atlanta's OK, though. I wouldn't mind the weather if it weren't for the bugs.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    20. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yea, I don't believe that, sorry. Unless you were getting utterly raped on rent. Housing in ATL is retardedly overpriced. I hope the bubble bursts another 10 times. 920k for a house in brookhaven, when I pay 580 in rent literally right down the street is stupid. You'll never recover your costs anywhere near the city. Renting is cheaper right now...in every scenario I calculated.

      And buying is a gamble unlike renting. You are not guaranteed anything once you buy. I've seen areas like Duluth go from being nice suburbs to overrun with outward moving inner-city trash. Your foundation may split, you could have a water-runoff problem, or a thousand other issues like termites. What guarantee are you referring to?

    21. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I lived near Detroit for 10 years.
      Yes, more coastline, but you can't go swimming until Memorial day.
      Yes, more freshwater, which is accompanied by the Michigan state bird (AKA giant mosquitoes)
      The fishing is good (if the "birds" don't bother you).
      I will gladly give up leaves turning colors to avoid having the ground turn white (and all the fun that goes with it).
      If I want to go snow skiing, I can go to the mountains with thousands of feet of vertical travel. In MI, you pay an arm and a leg for a manmade hill that is a few hundred feet high.
      -The people are almost as racially biased and segregated as the south.
      -Home values are still dropping because the population is.
      -Yes, Detroit is the worst, but the rest of the state doesn't have much going for it except the outdoors - which is kind of the antithesis of IT.
      I'm not done, but I'll stop now.

    22. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you forgot to add number 10:

      10) A government that taxes & regulates businesses so badly that they have all left or gone out of business!

      And it comes included in the package.

    23. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      4) We've don't get earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, termites, poisonous spiders/snakes.

      How boring. Of course, I live in Southern California where we have all of the above except hurricanes, so my viewpoint is a tad biased.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    24. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Speaking as someone who moved from CA to MI, and who has also lived elsewhere in the country...

      1) We've got more coastline than California - and it's fresh water.
      ---Yes, but I prefer cliffs and the ocean. Still, the MI coast is very nice. I wish that there were mountains here in MI, though. It's so incredibly flat, except for the UP, which is rather remote. In CA you have the ocean on one side, then some 2-4k foot tall mountains, than 2-3 hours to the east are 10-14k peaks. CA also has rain forests, and deserts. I miss the variety.

      2) We've got 4 seasons (which is good or bad depending on your preference).
      ---Winter: Very few people go outside. Plans that involve any travel have a 1/5 chance of needing to be changed unless you are willing to drive on uncleared roads. Many drivers don't think that tailgating should be put on hold when the roads are icy, so there are major delays (okay, only around Detroit) due to countless accidents.

      --Spring: Once it stops snowing, things are gray and muddy for 1-2 months before anything green appears. Then plants suddenly appear and they do it with a vengeance. I marvel at the explosion of plant life. The green part of spring lasts about 1-1.5 months before...

      -Summer: People spend all their time in the sun and complain (in my town here) about how cold it is whenever the 90% humid air drops below 80 degrees F. Having been deprived of sunlight all winter, many people have an obsession with it now. An odd side effect that I see all across the mid-west is the popularity of tanning salons, and of the very dark tan worn for as much of the year as possible. It leads to a lot of 30 year old people looking 45 because of skin damage.

      -Fall: 2-3 months of beautiful weather. My favorite time of the year here.

      3) More second homes than any other state (most on the water).

      -I'm not surprised to hear this. Nearly everyone I know here has a house "up north"

      4) We've don't get earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, termites, poisonous spiders/snakes.

      -No termites, really? I think we do have latrodectus variolus (black widows). We do get flooding, both widespread and localized to a basement when the "sump pump" dies. I'd never even heard of such a thing before I moved here.

      5) We do get the occasional tornado, but far less than most of the midwest.

      -There are half a dozen tornado warnings here each summer, but only one tornado near town every 30 years.

      6) Education: we've got plenty of geek-schools.

      -Ann Arbor has a great school (and is a great town). In terms of high schools, I'm a bit less positive. My significant other taught some college classes here and found that a lot of students, even brilliant students, had never written a single research paper in high school. Students who were smart enough to go to any college but who didn't know their way around a bibliography or citation were wronged by their schools. We spoke to some high school teachers who said that the state curriculum dropped research papers when the No Child Left Behind Act appeared. A lot of high schools still teach research papers, but a lot don't, because it's no longer a required topic by the state. I think that's a mistake.

      7) Manufacturing. Does anyone care? We can build anything here - tech included

      -I wonder how hard it will be to retool factories that have been closed for years to accommodate new goods.

      8) We've got an enormous set of technically capable people just waiting for companies to set up shop here.

      -That's absolutely true.

      Thinking MI makes me sad. I'm definitely an outsider (and in my oddly insular little area I've heard people from elsewhere referred to as Outsiders with a capital O), but I've found enough to like that I've got some affection for the state. I hope that the plans to revive the state with green industries work, but I worry that the decay of places like Detroit may not stop.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    25. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by alphajim · · Score: 1
      1. ..which is ice locked for how many months a year? 3-4? And when it does thaw, it's so cold that nobody really spends much time in it.

      2. More like 3. Winter, Mosquito, fall

      3. I suspect those are people getting away from the central midwest

      4. Ice storms? Overcast from october through march?

      5. about the same as anywhere that's not tornado alley

      6-8 I'll spot you these, but in the end, you have to sell yourself to the C level people who make location decisions and they've been fleeing the old rust belt for 40 years. I'm sorry, I'm from Buffalo and I feel your pain. Almost everybody I grew up with left for anywhere else. Cars were built in Detroit because it was on/near great lakes, steel mills, rail arteries and coal deposits. Otherwise it's a good place for orchards and other agg, but after you shoot the last CWD infested deer, then what do you do for fun?

    26. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Swimsc · · Score: 1

      My Ex is from Detroit. That's not so bad. Its the smell of hot dog water and the skunk rats in Ann Arbor that get under my skin.

    27. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 1

      1) We've got more coastline than California - and it's fresh water.

      No. You've more shoreline, not coastline. You can only have a coastline if you've a sea or an ocean coast, and you have neither. Secondly, shoreline does not equal beaches (or the weather to spend time at the beaches). There's a reason you see people going to the beaches of California and Florida and not to the beaches of Michigan or Illinois.

      We've got 4 seasons (which is good or bad depending on your preference).

      Well, sure. 2 months of summer don't count. :)

      More second homes than any other state (most on the water).

      Which means that most of the population is non-permanent, which makes it extremely hard from a taxation and a state infrastructure perspective. And as anyone who has driven in Michigan can tell you, infrastructure in Michigan is horrible - bad roads, little to no public transportation, poor quality public schools etc. Hell, even the good parks in Michigan are private (e.g. the Fred Meijer sculpture park).

      We've don't get earthquakes, hurricanes, forest fires, termites, poisonous spiders/snakes.

      No, instead you have bad roads, ice storms, blizzards and it's nigh impossible flying, driving (or boating) into Michigan at any time of the year except maybe for those two months in summer.

      We do get the occasional tornado, but far less than most of the midwest.

      Comparing yourself against the midwest (with the exception of Chicago) is like comparing yourself with a short, ugly and dumb prostitute. You may be taller, less uglier and relatively not as unintelligent - but that's not saying much.

      Education: we've got plenty of geek-schools.

      Really? I can only think of one good school that's ranked well - UMich Ann Arbor. Compare this with, say, New England (Harvard, Yale, Princeton, MIT, Columbia etc), California (several UCs and national labs, Caltech, Stanford etc) and so on. Once again, Michigan may have more schools than, say, Kansas or Arkansas - but that's not saying much. I mean, just look at Wikipedia -- Michigan vs. Massachusetts or California.

      Manufacturing. Does anyone care? We can build anything here - tech included

      Of course. The American car industry has certainly shown us the quality of American manufacturing. Oh wait.

      We've got an enormous set of technically capable people just waiting for companies to set up shop here.

      Eh?

    28. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 1

      Why? Great public transportation, good night scene, great restaurants and you've good schools (tech and otherwise) and lots of startups.

      If you live in a good neighborhood (not counting suburbs - say, Midtown or Buckhead), you can have a great life.

      Besides, there's something to be said about UGA and GSU girls. ;)

    29. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by RandCraw · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice, fair minded assessment.

      I've lived in MI (Midland, Kazoo, E. Lansing, Ann Arbor) for half of my life (50 years), and have a love/hate relationship with her. Other than the six months of gray skies (Nov-Apr), it's the most livable place I know (vs. PhillyPA, WashDC, SouthernVA, ChampaignIL, & HoustonTX). I'd return to A2 in a minute if I could find interesting work there.

      One more bennie Michigan has that the OP forgot to mention:

      9) SLASHDOT

              Randy

    30. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boston is one of the best places to live.

      Great schools, excellent job (and education) opportunities, good startups and VCs (especially tech and in the Cambridge area), great food and diversity, beaches that are short drives away, great public transportation, easy access by train or road to a lot of other places in the New England/NY area, plenty of outdoorsy activities etc.

      And of course, good scenic weather (if you're into the New England weather) and a landscape that's mostly lush green and beautiful.

    31. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by chiefbutz · · Score: 0

      Technically every spider is poisonous, just not always enough to effect humans. So there goes part of a point...

    32. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      I can't believe they left Austin off the good list. Maybe they meant Austin instead of Atlanta?

    33. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stewbacca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Boston is one of the best places to visit.

      Fixed that one. It's not affordable, and the weather and traffic suck. I don't care how great a city is--if a family of three can't afford a house with more than 1200 sq. feet and a fenced yard, it is automatically disqualified from the "best" places to live list, especially with bad weather and traffic.

    34. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Are you serious? Renting you are guaranteed nothing other than paying somebody else's mortgage for them. If you buy and your foundation splits or you get termites, you file an insurance claim. If the market falls out on you, keep living in the house until it recovers. If you live in Detroit, then yeah, you probably should have rented ;-)

    35. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek schools?

      MIT?

      Berkeley?

      Carnegie-Mellon?

      Stanford?

      Cornell?

    36. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Dr_Ken · · Score: 1

      I like it. I live in Ann Arbor though.

      --
      "If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff."
    37. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Altus · · Score: 1

      but you would get that even if the team wasn't winning championships, unless they really really sucked.

      Of course if they did suck, that would be counted as a big negative.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    38. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Altus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I personally, as an IT geek who isn't even making above the local average for my trade, can afford a single family 1,200 sq foot house with a fenced yard (and a garage) that is a mile away from a subway line.

      If I was willing to live further outside the city it would be cheaper.

      Of course I don't have a kid to support so if your talking about 1 person supporting a wife and kid and a house then you do have to move a bit further into the suburbs.

      As for living in Boston itself, your right, that's really expensive, but then almost nobody lives "in" Boston because it is a commuter city. Its also very very small, most cities in the US have a land area that is equal to the entire Greater Boston Area.

      Boston is expensive, but the pay is good. Also, housing prices are way down from where they were 5 years ago when the market was totally crazy.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    39. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? My girlfriend and I split out time between our places in Cambridge and Quincy, and a spacious 1000 sq ft apartment in the latter is less than $1500/month to rent. And it's only a mile from the train station, about ten minutes (bike ride) from the beach and you don't have to drive anywhere.

      And Quincy isn't the only one - Boston has several great neighborhoods where houses aren't that expensive.

      It's not my place to comment on your personal preferences; however it is hard to balance out opportunity and facilities versus urban sprawl. Suburbia in the US has a bad reputation for a reason. Personally, even if I have kids, I would much rather live in a condo in a big city (and have a house out in the country for the weekends) than anything else.

      Boston traffic is bad, yes, but you also have great public transportation. And it is no worse than any other big city in the US. As far as weather goes, I'm spending this week in Dallas, TX and let me tell you - I miss the weather in Boston so badly. Right now, it's 65 F with a mild drizzle and winds in Boston, compared to 100F and blinding heat in Dallas. Of course, New England weather (like Seattle or Oregon weather) is an acquired taste. I personally prefer the cool, windy and rainy weather over the alternative, so I love Boston weather.

    40. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by RyoShin · · Score: 1

      2) We've got 4 seasons (which is good or bad depending on your preference).

      Really? I spent five years on-and-off in Michigan at Kettering University. I only ever experienced two seasons: Winter and Potholes. During potholes it wasn't uncommon for it to rain a week straight.

      The weather in Michigan alone is more than enough to keep me from ever going back there permanently. A number of other factors, including it's economy, just sets that in stone.

    41. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 1

      8) We've got an enormous set of technically capable people just waiting for companies to set up shop here.

      They aren't coming.

    42. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by drpentode · · Score: 1

      I second that. I've been to the Grand Rapids area many times, and I've loved it every time. Plenty of forests, not a lot of traffic, and very intelligent and friendly people. I would have moved there if it wasn't for the winters and lack of jobs.

    43. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by PinchDuck · · Score: 1

      I actually live and work in Michigan. I really enjoy it here, so to each their own, I suppose. I doubt that the mosquitoes are worse here than anywhere else. For skiing, it certainly isn't Colorado, but a quick weekend up north for some cross country is cheap, fun, and healthy. If you've found a place you enjoy living more, good for you, life is too short to stay in a place you don't like. You must not be into sports, though, as you didn't mention the Lions. No criticism of Detroit is complete without mentioning them.

    44. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      But a $1500 /month mortgage in Dallas will get you a 3000 sq. Foot HOUSE. It's only hot there for a couple months, then you enjoy 9 months of 70ish weather the rest of the time.

    45. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by $criptah · · Score: 3, Informative

      Not 100% true. The problem with Boston and its greater area is age. The metro area was designed with nothing in mind. As a result a simple commute can turn into a nightmare if something goes wrong. there are not too many alternative routes once you get downtown because of the one-way streets that will exercise your patience to the point of no return. Also Boston is home to thousands of free-loading college students who make commutes on Friday and Saturday nights even more painful.

      I lived many blocks away from Fenway and yet every game turned my community and traffic around it into a clusterfuck. I worked next to AT&T stadium in SF and the side effects associated with each game were nothing compared to what I've experienced in Boston.

    46. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know if I'd go so far as to say "paradise" but its definitely pretty good. Plus, don't forget that there are great hubs of activity for intelligent people in Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids, Lansing/East Lansing (Go State!) and even the UP (think Marquette and Houghton, college towns) is trying to bring in and keep smart people.

      Not to mention- no one has lived in Detroit proper for at almost 30 years! All of the "money" has been streaming out of Wayne County and into the surrounding areas.
      Despite everything, the cost of living in Michigan is also still less than many other places, so you can get a bigger house, a better car, or simply save more of your money to go do the other things you want.

    47. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Coming from the north east, Vermont specifically I can understand the thought process behind considering $1500/month for 1000 sq ft to be a good deal.

      Most people that live there have no idea how cheap housing is in the south west. Here in Scottsdale, AZ for instance I have a 2400sq ft house with a pool for $1200/month and I'm paying above the average right now! So yeah, gimme three months of the suck weather for 9 months of fantastic weather. I remember the ole saying from Vermont. 9 months of winter, 3 months of bad skiing.

      Of course all this is combined with the fact that bandwidth is hella cheap here and Peoria even has a pilot program from broadband over powerlines. Of course fiber is available in a great number of homes here in the valley now as well which is even more fantastic.

      I'll drive four hours to spend a weekend in San Diego on the beach rather than choose to live close to it where everything is expensive. Of course 4 hours also puts me in Rocky Point, Mexico which is a fun spot too, so any given weekend I can feel like I'm taking a vacation which is something I never felt living in Vermont.

    48. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Vancorps · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean those crazy girls? No thanks! Of course I'm a bit jaded considering I had a girlfriend that went to GSU who was anorexic but really wanted to have a kid! Needless to say that relationship didn't last too long although the saying is true, crazy in the head, crazy in bed! Woohoo! For like a week

    49. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by runningduck · · Score: 1

      It sounds like all Michigan needs is a few entrepreneurs. I suspect, however, that the cost of living is too high preventing a real rich environment for innovation and grass roots start-ups from sprouting.

      --
      -rd
    50. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by moortak · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough Cleveland has tons to do.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    51. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      Strangely enough Cleveland has tons to do.

      I live in suburban Cleveland and I never sit around on a weekend wishing I had something to do outside the house. There is tons to do within 15-30 minutes of my house. Maybe nothing super exciting like amusement parks (although Cedar Point is less than an hour away) or watching sports teams win championships, but stuff that I can do with my children or fiancee and have a nice time.

      The problems here are a declining job market, housing market, economy in general. Urban sprawl killed Cleveland back in the 1970s, and it has been in its death throws ever since. Politicians talk about the "brain drain" of Clevelanders and Ohioans in general getting an education (we do have some good colleges, not ivy league, but good, solid universities such as Ohio State and CWRU) and leaving for greener pastures, but cannot get their heads out of their asses and fix the problems: they live in denial and cannot suck up their pride to do what is necessary. Even simple stuff such as changing some of the highways to remove choke points at interchanges (there is one spot on I-480 where I slow from about 80 to 30 every day) would make commuting more pleasant. Expanding the light rail system to be useful would be nice. Sorry, but lines that basically link the airport to downtown to the wealthy east side do nothing for those of us that commute between the southern suburbs: this would be around 80% of the white collar work force in the county.

      In general cities need to realize that their time is up. It has been for some time. People live and work in the suburbs for the most part. Urban areas are ghettos now, and the business districts are declining in most (but not all) cities. Give up the ghost, come up with solutions to make our lives easier, and people won't be so pissed off all the time like I am. I really want to move, but what are my options? Move away from family and everyone I know to wind up with the same shitty commute, the same standard of living, and being more bored because I don't know anyone?

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    52. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, and to quote a friend, the only two good things in Dallas are good restaurants and good strip clubs.

      To me, a 1000 sq ft apartment is plenty big. If I had a house, I'd have to worry about a garage, about garbage disposal, doing my laundry, gym and pool membership, maintenance and ad infinitum. An apartment or a condo? Compact, and all those amenities are usually part of the package. Hell, the place in Cambridge is 400 sq ft and that in itself works just fine.

      Besides, it's not just the summer (and honestly, I'd rather spend all 12 months having a Boston winter than a single week of Dallas summer). Dallas just looks and feels very superficial. You can perceive character and depth to some cities, and I don't feel that in Dallas.

      Boston has age and character, and there are a ton of things to do - art galleries, museums, book stores, music concerts, public libraries, sailing, climbing etc. Hell, if you are still bored, just take a train to New York over the weekend. I mean, there are *things* to do. This is probably one of the few places where if you walked into a book store in Cambridge, the guy working there could offer you a discourse on Jean Paul Sartre or John Stuart Mill or a barista talk to you about theoretical comp sci (real incidents both).

      Boston (and specifically Cambridge) also feels very, very entrepreneurial. A lot of my friends doing startups, using their graduate thesis to get seed funding, working for VCs etc. And there is a lot of youthful energetic feel, which is inspiring - and which reminds me of the Silicon Valley.

      Hell, even the bumper stickers tell me more - one place is full of religious mumbo jumbo and right-wing political stickers, while the other has bumper stickers along the lines of "I stop for aliens!". Go figure.

    53. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you have to live in the burbs of Scottsdale.

    54. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I live less than ten minutes from over one hundred restaurants, at least a dozen night clubs, the airport, and within 15 minutes from major highways like the 10 or the 60 although I'm less than a quarter mile from the 101.

      Of course I'm a half hour away from a lake as well which is quite fun, I'm 40 minutes from a place I can go tubing down the salt river. I'd say there's a reason it was voted "Most Livable City." Of course that was a while ago but I think in many ways it's still true.

      There are also a ridiculous number of tech companies in the area like GoDaddy, IO Data, OneNeck, Sunguard, Netapp, EMC, Cisco, and the list really keeps going.

    55. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Well see, here's the thing. A 1000 (or 400) sq.foot apartment might be fine to you, but to millions of families everywhere, that is simply not possible. People who are "fine" with expensive apartment living are so because they have no option. That doesn't make it good, better, or even acceptable, especially when I can move to any number of medium-large cities in America, make lots of money, and live in something other than a box-sized apartment.

      Hell, even the bumper stickers tell me more - one place is full of religious mumbo jumbo and right-wing political stickers,

      Well you got that part right. That's why I live in Austin.

    56. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason you believe Buying is better is simply because you have been ingrained to hear that from 'Money Professionals' your entire life.

      If I save 1,000 dollars per month and invest that in the market, even at a 3-4% return, it will absolutely smash your investment on a similarly priced house. No questions asked.

      I agree renting a 4 bedroom in the middle of the city is not a great financial decision. But a house really only offers more space. If you make a strict effort to invest that additional savings you get from renting cheaply, you will end up with much more money.

      Don't think for a second you cannot make renting work in your favor. Show me a house within the city limits that only costs 500/month (in a decent neighborhood).

    57. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GA Tech students are over rated, IMHO. We've hired plenty and just like any other school, some are Stars and some are Duds. They are not all great across the board.

    58. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aside from Detroit. And Pontiac. And Flint. And... How about we just ignore anything city-sized on I-75 up to and including the Soo?

    59. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by lavalamp70 · · Score: 1

      Noooo shit. ATL sux! I've been there for four years and am ready to get the hell out!

    60. Re:Come on, Detroit isn't that bad. by metlin · · Score: 1

      Oh that's not true. My job lets me live just about anywhere I want in North America. I just choose to live in the East Coast and in New England because -- get this -- I like it here.

      And I know that if I moved to Maine, or Arizona, or Hicksville, Kansas, I could get a bigger place. But that's not the point. I like being in a real city that's great to live in, and that's got great weather and lots of interesting things to do. And I *really* don't care about a place that's way bigger than I'll ever need it to be. I can never relate to the fascination with large living spaces.

      I mean, people have two apartments for a reason. You can have a smaller, more convenient one for the week and a slightly bigger one out in the suburbs for the weekends. Even if I do have kids, there is no reason they cannot be raised in a condo.

      Now don't get me wrong - I like Austin, and would like it more, if the temperature were about 40 degrees lower (anything more than 70 f is hot in my book).

      But the truth is, there are only a handful of good cities in the US and they are all expensive (New York, Chicago, Boston, San Francisco -- you get the idea).

  2. Urban jungles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've never seen one proper city that didn't feel like a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses. I could never live in one. Any ideas about which suburban or rural areas are good/bad to work in for IT jobs?

    1. Re:Urban jungles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Austin/Round Rock area is nice. It's growing fast, but your still never more than a few minutes away from a field of cattle. They're also building big assed roads out here, without the traffic to fill them yet. Seriously, the DOT budget here must be _insane_.

    2. Re:Urban jungles by wjousts · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      I've never seen a rural area that isn't mind-numbingly boring, has nothing going on and smells faintly of shit. I could never live in one.

    3. Re:Urban jungles by mh1997 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Any ideas about which suburban or rural areas are good...to work in for IT jobs?

      Yes, but I won't tell at the risk of turning it into

      a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses

    4. Re:Urban jungles by mdarksbane · · Score: 1

      If you don't mind the liberal guilt over contributing to modern sprawl, Columbus isn't bad. The industries available are somewhat limited though (a few interesting startups, but a *lot* of medical and insurance as well.

      But Columbus works fairly well because some of the tech centers have arisen in the upper class suburbs in addition to the old downtown. That means that if you pick one of the major freeways out and drive 5-10 minutes, you're far enough into the middle of nowhere to have cows for neighbors. Unfortunately it means you're also a fair drive from any of the traditionally interesting things to do in town, but it's working fairly well for me in general.

      But I get the impression you can find that sort of situation in most mid-major cities (Columbus, Indianapolis, St. Louis, Pittsburgh) in the "flyover" states.

      Another option you might consider is military contracting. There's a fair amount of IT work that goes into keeping the different military bases and training centers running, and most of those are (for obvious reasons) out in the middle of nowhere. Huntsville, AL, Fairborn, OH, those sorts of places. Might not be as much dev work on site but there is plenty of IT stuff.

    5. Re:Urban jungles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes! I too find that any place devoid of millions of humans packed into concrete silos stinks....

      Oh wait, no I don't. That's just dumb.

    6. Re:Urban jungles by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As opposed to the cities that smell completely like public restroom at a cheap bar? Actually New York was rather nice when I went there. The nothing going on part is true in some places but the problem with most cities is everything that is going on costs big bucks. Have you seen what theater tickets cost? A night at a club? Even a lot of museums are charging these days.
      It all depends on what you enjoy doing.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:Urban jungles by thesandbender · · Score: 1

      Grew up in Texas and now live in NYC. Yes the pace of life here is different but it's very easy to "smell the roses"... Central Park, Prospect Park, Fort Tyron. The north half of the Hudson trail, which is in Manhattan, is basically a forest. Even the urban areas can be relaxing... I'll eat breakfast on the breakwater of the BPC North Marina every now in then. 2-3 blocks from ground zero but you can watch all the boats glide by on the Hudson... it's relaxing (until the !#$!@#%! tourists show up :p). Your home is what you make of it.

    8. Re:Urban jungles by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      You can't give speeding tickets if the freeway to too busy to speed... With enough officers that baby could pay it's self off in no time!

    9. Re:Urban jungles by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      We're not a big city, but I'm quite happy in Clearwater, FL. We're part of the Tampa Bay area, with about 2.7 million people, but the Clearwater/St. Pete part of the region only has about 350K. I moved here from one of the cities on that list (Orlando), and god willing I'll never set foot in that city again. Tampa Bay is great as long as you stay the hell out of Tampa.

      A lot of mid-sized cities in Florida are like this. All the conveniences of a full-fledged city, but still sufficient ruralness in and around us. The peninsula area (St. Pete plus Clearwater) is pretty laid back.

      Nothing was worse than when I lived down in Boca Raton. One giant city stretching from Miami up to West Palm Beach. Truly suffocating. I had a 2.5 mile commute that took me 40 minutes, and I didn't even get on I-95. If the heat index wasn't 100+ degrees 3/4 of the year, I could have *walked* to work in less time.

    10. Re:Urban jungles by Mydnight · · Score: 1

      Up here in Canada Regina, SK isn't a bad place to work -- Saskatchewan is pretty much the only place in North America that still has a growing economy, and Regina has more square feet of park/person than anywhere else in the country.

    11. Re:Urban jungles by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      That's because you haven't been to the mountains. Farmland is flat, boring, and smells (fertilizer), but mountains can be quite nice for hiking and solitude, with the bonus of having interesting terrain.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    12. Re:Urban jungles by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I've never seen one proper city that didn't feel like a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses. I could never live in one. Any ideas about which suburban or rural areas are good/bad to work in for IT jobs?

      Suburban Boston is pretty nice. I don't hear gunshots on a regular basis (at least not since my last job, where the office park was right next to the shooting range), nor am I afraid to walk outside my door after sunset. I see plenty of trees outside my window, and my apartment complex is all off-street parking. If you want a little excitement, I'm a 15-minute drive or a 25-minute bus ride to the subway station, so getting to the city is pretty easy. The northwest suburbs have the "128 tech corridor" of Woburn, Burlington, Bedford, Lexington, and Waltham, so there's quite a bit of work where you don't have to commute into the city.

    13. Re:Urban jungles by Malc · · Score: 1

      Any reason you didn't mention the winter?

    14. Re:Urban jungles by IntlHarvester · · Score: 1

      The obvious example -- Silicon Valley is nearly vintage 1970s suburbia with more chinese/indian food.

      --
      Business. Numbers. Money. People. Computer World.
    15. Re:Urban jungles by Mydnight · · Score: 1

      Yes, we have one or two weeks of -50C weather a year... Other than that it's usually in the -20c range, which isn't that bad. You didn't mention the upside to cold weather, however: It doesn't get blindingly hot here, and it's a lot easier to keep warm than it is to stay cool.

    16. Re:Urban jungles by Malc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why would you live somewhere that requires you to have a car? What a crazy idea. I live in one of the larger cities in N. America and get around on foot or bicycle. It's at my pace. I live life at my pace - smelling the roses, or not. 5.30pm, minutes after finishing work... I'm sailing and chilling on one of the biggest lakes in the world.

      I've just got back from five months in Australia. In many ways, Melbourne is very similar to Toronto. I lived 45 km away from the city centre in SE suburbs. Never again. What a horrible way to live. Everything we wanted to do was 30 minutes min., probably 60 minutes drive away, on a highway. Talk about rushing around, not smelling the roses, and not actually doing anything. I loved my time in Australia, but I will never live in suburbia again. Out of the city is incredibly boring, and a dreadful lifestyle.

      Each to their own. Some people like it. I don't. I'm looking forward to moving to Europe's second biggest city later this year...

    17. Re:Urban jungles by adonoman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Canadian winters are what make the summers so enjoyable! If you don't get at least two weeks below -40, you don't savor the two week of summer as much as you should.

    18. Re:Urban jungles by Malc · · Score: 1

      I can move to England if I want a two week summer. I don't have to plug my car in for three months to keep it warm there!

    19. Re:Urban jungles by vertinox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've never seen one proper city that didn't feel like a very suffocating place, full of busy little bees who have no idea what it is to take the time to smell the roses. I could never live in one.

      If you have a car: Yes

      If you walk and take public transportation: No

      I used to be stressed all the time living in a city with over 5 million people simply because of the horrible traffic everywhere all the time.

      So, one day I decide to get rid of my car. I got a job closer to home and now I take the bus everywhere and I feel less stressed and have more money.

      I still visit friends (though I have to plan accordingly) and I can always rent a truck if I need to move anything big.

      Overall city life ain't bad when you don't have to drive in it.

      Though, word of warning... Your city needs to be made for public transportation. I don't think Atlanta or LA is going to be friendly for that.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    20. Re:Urban jungles by neurovish · · Score: 1

      We're not a big city, but I'm quite happy in Clearwater, FL. We're part of the Tampa Bay area, with about 2.7 million people, but the Clearwater/St. Pete part of the region only has about 350K. I moved here from one of the cities on that list (Orlando), and god willing I'll never set foot in that city again. Tampa Bay is great as long as you stay the hell out of Tampa.

      A lot of mid-sized cities in Florida are like this. All the conveniences of a full-fledged city, but still sufficient ruralness in and around us. The peninsula area (St. Pete plus Clearwater) is pretty laid back.

      Nothing was worse than when I lived down in Boca Raton. One giant city stretching from Miami up to West Palm Beach. Truly suffocating. I had a 2.5 mile commute that took me 40 minutes, and I didn't even get on I-95. If the heat index wasn't 100+ degrees 3/4 of the year, I could have *walked* to work in less time.

      There's "only" 350k in Clearwater/St. Pete because there isn't any more room to cram more...it's the most densely populated county in the state. What full-fledged city conveniences does Clearwater have? The public transportation is horrible, there's absolutely no nightlife to speak of, everything seems to shutdown at 10pm except for Denny's and Taco Bell, and it's a huge mass of standard American suburban bourgeois-template culture (granted there are a couple exceptions in downtown St. Pete). Weather-wise, it doesn't fare that much better than SFL (although nothing is as bad as Orlando during the summer...which is April -> October). The heat indexes have been over 100 for the past couple weeks, and it's only June.

    21. Re:Urban jungles by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Lincoln Omaha is terrible, little over a million people in the area and a dice search pulled up 112 jobs, mostly consulting companies...and our unemployment fell last year...But it is a good place to live though. I blame the local gov't for not attracting tech companies, we are a prime location for tech support (accent neutral, centrally located). We should see more corporations moving TO here not away.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    22. Re:Urban jungles by Average · · Score: 1

      I'm certainly a smaller town person at heart. Any smaller town of decent size has some IT jobs (hospital, school district, governments, whatever the major employers are).

      The problem is that there isn't some vast pool of IT jobs available. You can't necessarily get exactly what you want, and if you do go unemployed for a while, there may not be an IT job at all for a while. Oh, yeah, and the pay is crap compared to big city wages.

      On the flip side, houses in some smaller towns are coastal-jaw-droppingly cheap (quite functional houses go for $50k, sometimes less, in my part of Kansas).

      With the low cost of living, if you save up well in the good years, you can live on near-minimum-wage jobs for a year or two looking for the next rare opportunity.

    23. Re:Urban jungles by Grishnakh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that half the people in Clearwater are Scientologists.

    24. Re:Urban jungles by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      By conveniences, I mean things like not having to drive an hour to another town to get to a store that doesn't in "Mart" like most of my family (they live in small towns of under 50K). Having real medical facilities, and maybe even some culture (museums, theater, etc).

      As populations go, if you look at counties, yes, we are very high. If you look at the area, we actually aren't that bad. The Tampa Bay area has a population density that's well below the SFL region.

      I can count on one hand the cities in this country that have a public transportation system that doesn't blow.

      Nightlife? I thought that's what Ybor was for. Let all the club hoppers stay on that side of the bridge. Other than bars and the godawful theme park spots, what places normally stay open past 10-ish in any but a handful of giant cities? We're not a twenty-something-club-hopping town, and I *like* it that way.

      There is a noticeable difference in temperature. Our summer highs are about the same, but TB has lower lows than SFL, and our highs drop more rapidly outside of the summer months. The recent heat index spike is likely an anomaly. It certainly isn't the norm for this time of year.

    25. Re:Urban jungles by twistedsymphony · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I love the city because of how much is going on, lots of interesting hole in the wall places to hang out, meet people, do interesting things, etc.

      I live in a rural area though and here's why: I decided that I want a few things out of where I live:
      • a garage where I can work on my cars
      • an office where I can work on my electronics/computer projects
      • a home theater room big enough to support a projector, proper surround sound and seat a half dozen people comfortably

      I bought a small house in New Hampshire and work in IT for a manufacturer, the pays not the best, the jobs not the best, but I'm satisfied with both of those and I get to live in the home I wanted for relatively cheap money. I'm walking distance (half mile) from my local down town which certainly isn't as happening as any city to be sure, but there are some restaurants and small shops. My house is surrounded by trees, I have a large back yard with a patio where I can have bonfires and cookouts. It's got a guest room where friends can visit and spend the night and if I really want to catch a show in the city, it's a little over an hours drive to Boston...

      By comparison a friend of mine, same age, same vocation, lives outside of Boston makes about 20K more a year than I do, but his condo was close to THREE times what I paid for my house (nevermind the condo fees and taxes), and it's smaller than my college apartment. Even though he's paying city prices, he's not walking distance from anything, had has his car broken into a number of times sitting in the lot outside his condo, and for what?

      My company has a division in LA and they've tried to get me to move out there a number of times, the cost of living increase isn't worth what I'd be sacrificing... I've lived in the city, and I've lived in rural areas... there is a lot of middle ground, the key is figuring out what is truly important to you and finding the middle ground that suites your needs.

    26. Re:Urban jungles by oatworm · · Score: 1

      Wow... I think there's a web site dedicated to people like you. Tell me, do you own a television?

      In all seriousness, I loved cities when I was single. They were busy, everything was near everything, I could hang out with my friends - good times. Then I had a kid. Suddenly, being in an area that actually quiets down before 10 was a priority. Being able to afford an apartment that can actually fit two adults and a kid became a priority. Having some green space for the kid to play in became a priority (public parks are okay). Being in an area where the kid can step outside semi-unsupervised and not go into full-on panic mode became a priority. Though some cities are better than others at meeting that list of criteria, suburbia, for all its faults, was practically designed around providing just that.

    27. Re:Urban jungles by jazzkat · · Score: 1

      Yes. And if you don't mind putting up with an hour or so commute - something that those of you on the coasts might do anyway - you can have a large lakefront home in a resort community for less than $300k. With three choices for high speed internet, it's possible to telecommute full or part time, if your employer is understanding. If you don't have a need for lakefront property, you can get 3,000 sf of living space, still with spectacular views, for less than a grand a month. I am reminded of vacations in Cape Cod every time I walk the dogs.

    28. Re:Urban jungles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No everyone is into hiking. I know I'd much rather enjoy the nightlife with friends in a city than walking around in dirt on a mountain.

    29. Re:Urban jungles by causality · · Score: 1

      You can't give speeding tickets if the freeway to too busy to speed... With enough officers that baby could pay it's self off in no time!

      Amusing in a sardonic sort of way, when they build highways that look a lot like drag strips (wide, flat, straight, and with high visibility) and then pretend that there is a difference in safety between the 65 mph posted limit and 70 or 75 and they do this with no regard to whether there was even another car on the road. Nah, no revenue generation scheme there.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    30. Re:Urban jungles by stillpixel · · Score: 0

      if you don't mind the heat and humidity of central Texas.. I admit, Austin is fairly nice, but super hot and humid, fire ants, snakes, spiders, scorpions..etc....Dell.. those things just turn me off.

    31. Re:Urban jungles by stillpixel · · Score: 0

      drove through there a year ago.. it was very bland and unappealing, like looking at a brown paper bag.

    32. Re:Urban jungles by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      The reason Omaha has trouble hanging onto tech companies is party because they get go public, get bought by a bigger company, then that bigger company moves them away.

      It would be nice if some tech support companies would start up here, though. It's like call-center central here.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    33. Re:Urban jungles by pnuema · · Score: 1

      St. Louis. It's not New York, but it still has world class attractions (#1 zoo in the country, top 10 symphony and art museum). I live fifteen minutes from just about anywhere I could want to be, including downtown. Has one of the best costs of living in the country (to maintain my buying power in a move to San Francisco my income would have to double), great place to raise a family - lots of free or low cost things to do with the kids. Best of all, I drive an hour in any direction and I'm in the woods. The weather has a lot of variety, and it is flyover country, but it has a lot to offer.

    34. Re:Urban jungles by MooseMuffin · · Score: 1

      I enjoy driving. I enjoy privacy. I like to be close enough to visit friends and family, and far enough away so those visits require advance planning and justification. I have friends who live in the city, and everything about that environment feels like a perpetual invasion of my space. Give me a supermarket within 10 minutes and a mall/movie theater within 30 and I'm happy. I spent 10 days in Tokyo, and despite having no trouble getting around with their very nice rail system, as I arrived back I found myself looking forward to driving myself back home.

    35. Re:Urban jungles by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Ya the problem is, the Gorgeous areas of nebraska are the north and south sides. Nebraska is actually a very very diverse state of river valleys, foothills, desert, Forest, and Plains. However, I80 shows you basically the plains and that is it. It is actually very pretty, just depends on what you like. I really like it out here, but that is a matter of taste. I dont expect someone from the northeast or from a city to understand what WY,KS,NE,SD,OK people love about the true midwest.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    36. Re:Urban jungles by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Ya I wouldn't mind moving up to Omaha, but every other job up there is Consulting or Tech center. Blech...booooorrrriiiiinnnngggg. I like the startup smaller business, get my hands in several pots, do what I do well. I had my fill of corporate years ago, I'll take the smaller salary and the interesting projects any day.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    37. Re:Urban jungles by The+Lyrics+Guy · · Score: 1

      Likewise, if you head 25 minutes west of Boston via 90 you'll hit MetroWest (Framingham, Natick, Ashland, Hopkinton, Holliston) where housing is relatively affordable and large lots of land can be had. The Commuter Rail goes into Boston at a regular and convenient schedule, so if you work in Boston and live in MetroWest you can save a lot of money on gas by taking the train every day.

    38. Re:Urban jungles by theverylastperson · · Score: 1

      Slow down there city boy ;-p
      I get the gist of what you're saying and I totally agree with one small exception. You don't have to live in a large city to not be a commuter and there are plenty of fabulous tech jobs in small town america.
      I live in a town of 2,600 about 30 minutes from the suburbs of Kansas City.
      I live within walking distance from my office and within walking distance of the school, stores. Everything is right here. Sure we go to KC once or twice a month, but we sure aren't rushing around.
      The point I wanted to make was that rural america does offer some great tech jobs.
      Did I mention I'm 15 minutes from the lake? Life is good.

      --
      ed duval the very last person
    39. Re:Urban jungles by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Louisville, KY is a great place to live. Biggest little town around, or is it littlest big town around. Either way, it feels like a small town, but has all the amenities and culture, great weather, decent cable provider that hasn't screwed me over like other providers I read about, etc. IT jobs are not hard to come by, but the city does need a vast increase of industries other than food services and health services. (more restaurants per capita than anywhere, has top notch hospitals and university.)

    40. Re:Urban jungles by hab136 · · Score: 1

      Being in an area where the kid can step outside semi-unsupervised and not go into full-on panic mode became a priority.

      I grew up lower-middle class in NYC and often left home after school for hours at a time, completely unsupervised. I used to walk home for lunch in elementary school. I took the subway to high school. Most of my friends did the same.

      "panic" is the correct way to describe how most parents feel about kids in a city - irrational, emotional, and stupid.

      Most humans are okay. Most murders/molestations/etc happen from someone you know. The evil random stranger isn't a big threat, even in a big city.

    41. Re:Urban jungles by DrgnDancer · · Score: 1

      Knoxville, TN and Huntsville, AL may be along the lines of what you want. I currently live in Huntsville. They're both big DOE, NASA, and DoD contracting centers and have a really large number of IT and computing jobs, but the towns are medium sized (Huntsville is about a 200K metro area, Knoxville a bit bigger I think). Near to the Appalachian Mountains, plenty of outdoor stuff to do, reasonably inexpensive living (though not as cheap as you are talking), really decent "small town' living, but a much larger (and better paid) than natural IT sector.

      Personally I'm not hugely happy here. I'm a city boy at heart; and find the lack of public transportation, lack of cute little restaurants and shops in walking distance of home, generally socially conservative outlook of the populace and such a bit unfortunate. You sound like you're looking for something like this though. Might be worth your time to check out. And please don't get me wrong... I don't hate it here (I was afraid I would), and I like the ready availability of both outdoor activities and even a pretty good cultural event calendar. It's not my first choice, but it's not bad at all.

      --
      I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
    42. Re:Urban jungles by The+End+Of+Days · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the generally racist attitudes and the inability to meet more than 1 person per square mile with an IQ above their shoe size.

      Although I do get a kick out of explaining repeatedly how I can stand to have neighbors that speak Spanish. One can never say "It's not really a big deal, Cletus," often enough.

    43. Re:Urban jungles by neurovish · · Score: 1

      By conveniences, I mean things like not having to drive an hour to another town to get to a store that doesn't in "Mart" like most of my family (they live in small towns of under 50K). Having real medical facilities, and maybe even some culture (museums, theater, etc).

      That is very true...I sometimes forget places like that exist.

      As populations go, if you look at counties, yes, we are very high. If you look at the area, we actually aren't that bad. The Tampa Bay area has a population density that's well below the SFL region.

      I can count on one hand the cities in this country that have a public transportation system that doesn't blow.

      Nightlife? I thought that's what Ybor was for. Let all the club hoppers stay on that side of the bridge. Other than bars and the godawful theme park spots, what places normally stay open past 10-ish in any but handful of giant cities? We're not a twenty-something-club-hopping town, and I *like* it that way.

      ...I also consider most US cities to not really have city conveniences since they're lacking in the public transit sector. If you have to have a car to go about daily life without suffering massive inconvenience, then you're living in a suburb...even if that suburb has a name like "LA". Ybor's nightlife has been dull ever since it became "safe" in the 90s (doors have to close at 3am?)...you don't need to be a twenty-something-club-hopping town, but some variety would be nice. It's sad when one of the best nightspots is a chain restaurant/bar. Not everywhere needs to be South Beach, but it would be nice if there was something like that close by. In large cities, you can find almost anything open late at night that you would during the day...good places to get some food, coffee, or somewhere to just chill. I don't need an entire town telling me that I should either be in bed or at a bar.

      There is a noticeable difference in temperature. Our summer highs are about the same, but TB has lower lows than SFL, and our highs drop more rapidly outside of the summer months. The recent heat index spike is likely an anomaly. It certainly isn't the norm for this time of year.

      I do notice a difference between TB and SFL in the winter, but it's the summer highs that are killer.

      The area would be nice enough to come back to and retire or maybe raise a family, but it's lacking in variety and kinda dull if you're not ready for either one of those.

    44. Re:Urban jungles by neurovish · · Score: 1

      Except that half the people in Clearwater are Scientologists.

      Only if you're downtown/near downtown...and then it's more like 80%
      Clearwater Scientologists don't really hassle you anyways; it's the ones in Tampa and St. Pete that are always trying to "help" you.

    45. Re:Urban jungles by Alomex · · Score: 1

      I enjoy privacy.

      I doubt you get much of that on the highway during your daily one-hour-each way commute to work.

      Same applies to people who move to the burbs because "they like a big yard", but they are too tired to ever make use of it.

    46. Re:Urban jungles by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm hoping to have a startup company here in Omaha a few years, so I'll just bookmark this comment and send you an email once we get going :)

      There ARE startups around here, but you really have to go digging around for them. They love to stick themselves in the middle of residential areas or in a strip mall, we really don't have a 'tech' area of the city.

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    47. Re:Urban jungles by Leebert · · Score: 1

      I've never seen a rural area that isn't mind-numbingly boring, has nothing going on and smells faintly of shit. I could never live in one.

      Uhura: Peace and quiet appeals to me, Lieutenant.
      Liuetenant: Well, maybe that's okay for someone like you whose career is winding down. But me, I need some challenge in my life. Some adventure. Maybe even just a surprise or two.
      Uhura: You know what they say... be careful what you wish for. You may get it.

      (Posted from rural Carroll County, MD. Have to go, I think the cows are prank ringing my doorbell again...)

    48. Re:Urban jungles by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Which is that? I think it's London or Paris, depending what measure you're using.

      I live in London, and agree with everything you say. Also, using a bicycle here gives me a lot more flexibility -- I live 100 metres from a vast park, but 15 minutes from the nearest station (on foot). Because of the latter, I'm saving £££ in rent. It's 4 minutes by bike to the station.

      Having said that, I've only recently finished university. This time last year, most of my friends living within half an hour's walk of each other. Now, we've spread out around the whole city (within a 4 hour walk of each other?), which means we can only really meet in central London.

    49. Re:Urban jungles by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      You and your friends can go drink in the woods around a fire.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    50. Re:Urban jungles by COMON$ · · Score: 1

      Well look me up, I should be independent by then (wife pharmacist) and will be looking for an interesting company. adamatadamandreadotcom let me know what you are thinking.

      --
      CS: It is all sink or swim...oh and did I mention there are sharks in that water?
    51. Re:Urban jungles by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Geeze, my comment was no more flamebait that the one it replied to. Some people have no sense of irony.

    52. Re:Urban jungles by zoward · · Score: 1

      Wow, I wonder how close you are to me. I'm in southern NH, about an hour's drive to Boston. My 2400 sq. ft. house with views of Mt. Monadnock and the Wapacks from the upper windows and a private beach at the bottom of my street cost $185,000 in the early nineties. Boston is easily drivable for culture, but I'm more likely to be in Nashua or Manchester. Also, flying out of Manchester is an order of magnitude easier than Boston. No pollution, low crime rates, access to Boston's hospitals, schools, and employers, an hour to the seashore, skiing in the winter. I love this place.

      --
      "Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?"
    53. Re:Urban jungles by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      I'm up in Tilton, but less than a mile from the RT93... I can be in Boston in an hour 20 so long as I don't hit any crazy traffic. I have few complaints, the crazy snow in the winter, and the humid summers, but on a whole I can't think of any other place I'd rather live.

  3. No way by Stargoat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish I would be transferred to Alaska. The hunting and fishing is great. There is room to breath. A man can raise a family in a manner more suitable to the American ideal. The commutes cannot be any worse than the suburbs of any major US city.

    Sign me up!

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
    1. Re:No way by causality · · Score: 4, Informative

      I wish I would be transferred to Alaska. The hunting and fishing is great. There is room to breath. A man can raise a family in a manner more suitable to the American ideal. The commutes cannot be any worse than the suburbs of any major US city. Sign me up!

      I hope you already have a family going then, because Alaska has a terribly unfavorable male-to-female ratio. Unfavorable if you're a man, that is. Otherwise I do agree with you.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:No way by Skyshadow · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Plus you get paid to live there by the Federal government. Of course, night life is somewhat limited and then there's always the Sarah Palin thing.

      The mistake this article makes it the classic one of assuming that IT folks (a) all want the same sort of things from life and (b) need to live within commuting distance of work. In reality, we cover the spectrum pretty well from TINKs to nuclear family members to shit-crazy Unibomber types to living in our mothers' basements.

      My fondest hope is to eventually work myself to a point where I can telecommute regularly and just live within an hour or two of a significant airport (aka, I need to be valuable enough to get away with this).

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    3. Re:No way by demachina · · Score: 0, Troll

      Two words.... "Sarah Palin".

      P.S.

      This has to be one of the lamest /. submissions of the month.

      --
      @de_machina
    4. Re:No way by MBCook · · Score: 1

      Don't forget no taxes and a yearly check from the Permanent Fund.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    5. Re:No way by KermodeBear · · Score: 1

      I agree. I would love to move to Alaska. Any Alaskan companies looking for an experienced LAMP developer? I scan the job sites on a regular basis but haven't found any appropriate opportunities.

      --
      Love sees no species.
    6. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      "This has to be one of the lamest /. submissions of the month."

      I think the C64 vs the iPhone is worse.

    7. Re:No way by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      No nightlife!? During the summer it's light outside nearly 24 hours a day. You could play outside for 24 hours and barely notice. There are summer solstice parties and such. During the winter you can enjoy additional night hours for those nocturnal activities (e.g. insert your favorite nighttime shenanigans here). It also gives you an excuse to stay in your basement - it's dark and cold outside.

      Also, your signature is awesome.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    8. Re:No way by moosesocks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhm, no.

      Alaska has a ton of oil and very few people. The Alaska Permanent Fund is an endowment created by the state government that sets aside approximately 25% of the state's proceeds from mineral sales.

      The dividends from this endowment are then divvied up and paid to the people living in the state.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    9. Re:No way by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      And considering the available men, it is unfavorable to women too!

    10. Re:No way by CaseM · · Score: 1

      You're posting on slashdot. It's not like you had a prayer anyway.

    11. Re:No way by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      shit-crazy Unibomber types to living in our mothers' basements

      I think you're insulting the Unibomber. IIRC, he at least had his OWN place to live.

    12. Re:No way by TeamSPAM · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think the proper acronym is DINK - Dual Income No Kids. This led me to come up with the SINKING acronym for an old coworker. It stands for Single Income No Kids Incredibly Needy Girlfriend. :)

      --
      Brought to you by Team SPAM! where we believe: "Information in the noise!"
    13. Re:No way by jrp2 · · Score: 1

      "I agree. I would love to move to Alaska. Any Alaskan companies looking for an experienced LAMP developer? I scan the job sites on a regular basis but haven't found any appropriate opportunities."

      I agree with you, but if you look beyond the snarky comments in the "article" you will see they also consider the employment situation. Anchorage perhaps has the lowest per-capita quantity of IT jobs of any major city in the US. The number of tech companies that have a significant presence there is near zero. Just a few corporate IT jobs.

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
    14. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your kids can be eaten by the local Grizzley Bear while tehy wait for the school bus at the corner. Oh yeah... Alaska is awsome!

    15. Re:No way by $criptah · · Score: 1

      +1. If it were not for my SO, I would totally move. After living in many states and traveling around the U.S. I am convinced that any city out there is a bad place. Suburbs are even worse because you have to maintain your house, your lawn and do other dog tricks in order to remain a good neighbor. I understand that: Nobody wants to live next to a guy who has 2 cars on bricks and an moved lawn. But reality bites and trying to keep up with your neighbors is a royal pain in the ass especially if you don't have any slightest wish to do so.

      I would love to live in a remote place where I can get a decent chunk of land so I don't have to watch my neighbors wash their cars and throw kid parties every weekend. Give me a salary I can live on w/o issues, a satellite dish, and a house. I will gladly commute to work on a horse, go fishing, and do night photography on weekends in a place where you can actually see stars. As far as I am concerned suburbs and metro areas are slow death.

    16. Re:No way by module0000 · · Score: 1

      No, you're wrong. I just moved back from Alaska. The hunting and fishing is perceived as great because the movies paint it that way - it's just *different* game, not more or less of it.

      Reasons NOT to raise your family in Alaska:

      1) At rush hour, you're stopped at a red light, and you notice 10 drunk/unconious/vomit-covered natives laying on the sidewalk, surrounded by bodily waste and empty whiskey bottles. You realize they make MORE money than you, for doing absolutely nothing.

      2) You may have hit a deer in your car, and you might have even got it fixed. Not only do moose kill your car on impact, they usually kill you too.

      3) Moose everywhere in the cities, and they are very territorial. So much that the primary animal-related cause of death in Alaska is - you guessed it - moose stomping your guts out.

      4) Minus 80 degrees in the winter, and 100-105 degrees in the summer with humidity to boot! (everywhere BUT Anchorage and the SE area below it)

      5) High prices! $5.00 + a gallon gas, $5-10 per pound of apples, and similar prices for all vegetables/fruit. Why? Because it's all imported.

      6) It's DARK in the winter. Ever heard of SAD? It's epidemic - the state recommends you leave your x-mas lights up year round to help combat this.

      The list could go on...and on...and on... Until you've lived there, you will only have a romantic notion of the place that is sold to you by the television and movies. It's not real!
       

      --
      Trackball users will be first against the wall.
    17. Re:No way by lgbarker · · Score: 1

      As in "the odds are good and the goods are odd"?

    18. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep....and the bears here love to dine on nice plump tender IT folk.

    19. Re:No way by winomonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Alaska is actually a pretty great place to work, and Anchorage isn't too bad. If you are keen on doing contract work, there are more than enough big-oil and government gigs to keep local shops hopping (and hiring). If you like something perhaps a little more noble than working at an hourly rate for the oil man, there are some interesting shops up here doing software development. Want to work for a 10-year-old internationally-known telehealth company? We are hiring .NET ninjas at present. Nature is accessible ... or, more accurately, unavoidable. There are five moose that frequent the lake near our campus throughout the winter months. I can ski five miles from my house to the backdoor of my office and only cross two small side roads due to our extensive trail system. My boss takes about a month off each fall to shoot large animals to provide winter food. Fridays are good days to take off early so that you can get some fishing in. We have a growing (but still young) downtown scene. First Friday artwalks, bike co-ops, art studios, some great microbreweries, a decent hockey team (Brabham Cup and Kelly Cup winners), a horrible arena football team, rollerderby. Winters can drag on a little long (but, as the article mentions, we get less snow than upstate New York), but the summers are phenomenal. Everyone should come work in Alaska (or at least two more senior developers).

    20. Re:No way by winomonkey · · Score: 1

      www.afhcan.org - fatfingered something in the href tag above, so it stripped out the link in my previous post.

    21. Re:No way by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      The problem with hunting and fishing in Alaska is that there is always a real chance that you will be the game. Bears think people are just yummy.
                      Then again the dangers from freaks in Miami, the stinking year round heat, the endless traffic jams as well as lower wages and higher expenses makes being eaten by a bear in Alaska sound like a reasonable idea.

    22. Re:No way by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no.

      Alaska has a ton of oil and very few people. The Alaska Permanent Fund is an endowment created by the state government that sets aside approximately 25% of the state's proceeds from mineral sales.

      The dividends from this endowment are then divvied up and paid to the people living in the state.

      Alaska does have the highest net income of Federal government money per capita of any state. Maybe he was referring to that.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    23. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Which is the opposite of a SITCOM: Single Income, Two Children, Oppressive Mortgage.

    24. Re:No way by hab136 · · Score: 1

      I think the proper acronym is DINK - Dual Income No Kids

      I've also seen DINC - Dual Income, No Children.

      But maybe he actually meant Triple Income, No Kids?

    25. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't any good IT jobs in Anchorage, and there are essentially none in Fairbanks and Juneau. The few that exist are all either government or oil, and both are hellish environments. Pay is substandard despite higher cost of living, and there are unofficial caps beyond which the oil companies don't think IT is worth paying for. There are some small independent contractors, but they're run by locals and mostly hire locals who are going to be more reliable over the long term, since Outsiders tend to freak out after a few years and run away. There are a couple of jobs with some banks and the local newspaper. They get advertised every six months or so. From that you can draw your own conclusions about retention rates.

    26. Re:No way by jerrydel · · Score: 1

      Wow, you used the word "nuclear" and "Unibomber" in the same sentence! Guess you're not worried that the Feds will...

      Hey, where'd all these guys in riot gear come from?

    27. Re:No way by Crisavec · · Score: 1

      No it doesn't. The only place that might apply is out in the Bush...any place on the road system is pretty much even on the male-female ratios.

      And yes, I live here and have for over a decade. I've also done work for clients in just about every decent sized town in the state, so I have a fair idea of whats out there.

    28. Re:No way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to breathe. There is room to BREATHE.
      Breathe is a verb. It rhymes with "seethe". Ex: "I seethe with anger over usage errors so badly that I cannot breathe".
      Breath is a noun. It rhymes with "death", Ex: "Your failure to grasp this distinction takes by breath away."
      http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/breath.html

  4. Gary Indiana by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Funny

    makes Detroit look like Paris.

    1. Re:Gary Indiana by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      makes Detroit look like Paris Hilton.

      TFIFY. You left a word out of that sentence.

    2. Re:Gary Indiana by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Devoid of culture and worn out? It already looks like tha-

      Oh, the CITY!

    3. Re:Gary Indiana by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretty much. There's nothing quite like that thick yellow smog that hangs in the air over Gary, or that lovely smell of sulfer and despair that reminds you "Yep, this is Hell. Enjoy your visit from the safety of the highway or the train, and thank your lucky stars you don't have to get out."

      "Detroit" proper certainly sucks, but it's never really had an IT infrastructure to start out with. Outside of Compuware, high-tech jobs just don't exist there. I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that those 440+ IT jobs in "Detroit" are postings from Livonia or Novi, which is about the same as equating a job posting in Simi Valley with one in Compton.

      I worked IT for a Community College that serves Detroit. By far the most dysfunctional IT organization I've ever seen. After getting hired, the first thing my boss told me was "I can't believe they hired you, you're not related to anybody here." Dozens of redundant administrators with no real job function other than drawing a paycheck, a single, insanely flaky DNS and AD server (located downtown) serving 5 remote sites that would wipe out connectivity across all campuses when it went down. I finally started SSH tunneling all of my traffic to my home connection so I could at least keep myself entertained. One of my favorite moments was when one of the network administrators was on site and I showed him what I was doing. His first question: "What's SSH?" By that time, I wasn't even remotely surprised. I was slightly surprised when I saw that job posted internally after the same admin moved to a different role. Starting salary: 65k. A junior admin with no skills whatsoever pulling down that kind of money. God only knows what his bosses made...

      I was finally "indefinitely laid off" (no one ever got fired, downsized, rightsized, or had their position eliminated. You were simply placed on indefinite lay off. I heard of people getting called back to their jobs 5+ years after they got laid off) by the "Senior Associate Vice president of human resources", and yes, there were associate VP's of HR, VP's of HR, and a President of HR. If you were in the HR department, you were some form of Vice president. Or you were a secretary who was assumed to be boning and or related to his or her associated vice president. I had two weeks vacation and was told that I had a signing bonus from the union contract (Yep. Union IT. The union was equally incompetent) coming to me upon my "lay off." I was paid 8 hours vacation (the payroll system was never, ever right. They said I had 8 hours, they paid me 8, and sent me to one of the dozens of voicemail boxes that never got checked.) and told that the bonus didn't really apply to me due to a quirk in the rules.

      So I walked away with a day's pay instead of a month's, and I framed the letter. I use it as a reminder of how crappy an organization can really be.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    4. Re:Gary Indiana by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      Or you were a secretary who was assumed to be boning and or related to his or her associated vice president.

      Wait wait, they were boning their boss/relative?

  5. Bozeman MT by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where until recently, your passwords were government property.

    1. Re:Bozeman MT by moon3 · · Score: 1

      if you have to surrender you Facebook, MySpace and Twitter accounts, how any more IT unfriendly it could possibly get?

    2. Re:Bozeman MT by SkinnyKid63 · · Score: 1

      Having lived near Bozeman, it's actually a pretty nice town, with great outdoor activities, decent airport, and a decent number of IT companies. All in all, a pretty good place to live/raise a family, assuming you don't work for the local government.

  6. The complete list by Whatsisname · · Score: 5, Informative

    The list for people that don't like slideshows:

            1. Detroit, Mich. - Jobs available: 449
            2. Bentonville, Ark. - Jobs available: 81
            3. Cleveland, Ohio - Jobs available: 211
            4. Syracuse, N.Y. - Jobs available: 49
            5. Tie: Boston, Mass., and San Francisco, Calif.
            6. Anytown in Alaska - Jobs available: 24
            7. Orlando, Fla. - Jobs available: 235
       

    1. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Karma karma karma karma karma ka-karma whore...

    2. Re:The complete list by lorenlal · · Score: 1

      As a worker in the top worst city of them all:

      449 jobs? That's got to be a lie unless they're including the entire metro area. Also - those open positions are usually listed as open because someone's trying to hold onto the position so it gets cut instead of a human. I know this because:
      1) That's how my area "laid off" someone.
      2) I know plenty of people who have applied for some of these and received a lovely letter saying, "This position has been 'canceled.'"

      I'd also wager that many of the filings were posted before the bankruptcy filings, and were vacated because people who could move... did.

    3. Re:The complete list by jimbobborg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I find it funny that Boston is on both the best and worst list.

    4. Re:The complete list by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it funny that Boston is on both the best and worst list.

      I recently was in Boston for the first time on business. I thought it was a great city as there was plenty of good food and night life as well as viable mass transit. Unfortunately there were the downsides too. I thought the city was "old" and "dirtier" than what I am accustomed to in Minneapolis and I definitely didn't feel terribly safe wandering around by myself at night. Would I live there compared to Minneapolis? Probably not but do I see why it's on both the best and the worst, yes.

    5. Re:The complete list by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      I find it funny that they think the Bay area's lack of a major sports championship counts against them but then, in the same sentence, count Boston's championships as negatives as well. Is a sports championship a positive or a negative? It can be either one or neither, but it can't be both!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    6. Re:The complete list by darjen · · Score: 1

      I lived in Cleveland for several years. It's not that bad as long as you avoid about 50% of the city.

    7. Re:The complete list by zzsmirkzz · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on how you look at it, and they didn't want to stick with one view-point. I was more curious to where the positive correlation between professional sports and and IT jobs this article implies comes from, it sure as hell doesn't make any sense to me.

    8. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Syracuse is a great place to live and work. Violent crime is very low, great houses are cheap, and there's a ton of both work and money if you're willing to start your own business.

      Whine all you like, but how many of you can get up at 9am, make some breakfast, have some coffee, play with the dog, work until 4pm, then do whatever you feel like until midnight, all with no debt, no worries and vacations whever you want? Also, FWIW, the snow in Syracuse isn't all that bad while SCUBA diving in the Caribbean.

      Jobs suck everywhere. Owning your own business is the greatest thing since the invention of fun, food and sex.

    9. Re:The complete list by paazin · · Score: 4, Informative

      I thought the city was "old" [...]

      Well, considering that it's one of the oldest cities in the US, not a really big surprise.

      [...] "dirtier" than what I am accustomed to in Minneapolis and I definitely didn't feel terribly safe wandering around by myself at night.

      Like most places, depends on where you are. Some sections of the Boston Metro area are pretty bad (Roxbury, I'm looking at you) but even in some of the "dingy" areas of the city (where many of the university students live) are actually quite safe and have a good amount of interesting culture and unique qualities you wouldn't find in the midwest or many other US cities.

    10. Re:The complete list by the+phantom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too little water and you die of dehydration. Too much water, and you drown. Is water a good thing or a bad thing?

      Perhaps the implication is that a city needs to have the occasional professional sports championship in order to be a good place to live, but that if it racks up too many championships, it becomes unlivable again. I have far less trouble with this assertion than I do with understanding why professional sports matter at all vis-a-vis the quality of a work location.

    11. Re:The complete list by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      I didn't understand that either. But one thing I'd mention is that Red Sox games make public transportation (green line) grind to a halt. Can't recall that being much of a problem though with our other sports franchises.

    12. Re:The complete list by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      I can attest to Syracuse, NY. I live there and I had to take a job in Rome/Utica, NY (~hour drive away). I graduated college in nov. 07 with a BS in CS from the Rochester Institute of Technology. I got a part-time tech support job starting in jan 08. a full time web dev job in utica in april 08. then moved to software dev at Griffiss AFB in april 09. Unfortunately, Rome is a pretty crappy city so I'm commuting :/

      --
      -SaNo
    13. Re:The complete list by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      > Is a sports championship a positive or a negative? It can be either one or neither, but it can't be both!

      It's a positive.

      Unless it's the Red Sox.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    14. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree.

      I have several friends that were laid off (in the D), and it took them literally months to find a job. Some still have not found anything.

      The greater Detroit area was a pretty nice place, but house values are in the crapper so you can't sell your house to move,

      every other day some nearby plant, grocery store or restaurant closes down,

      and a ton of dealerships and manufacturing plants are on the chopping block.

      Only a matter of time before our state is a ghost town just filled with vacation homes on the coastline.

    15. Re:The complete list by hoggoth · · Score: 1

      See what I did there? I made a sports joke. I made it sound like the sportsy things I've heard people say. I hope it's funny. I don't actually know anything about sports and I suspect many geeks on Slashdot don't either, unless it's RobotWars.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    16. Re:The complete list by taxman_10m · · Score: 1

      After the Red Sox beat the curse it seems to me that everyone became hyper involved with the Red Sox. If you don't care for game of baseball and specifically do not watch the Red Sox it makes you a bit of an outcast.

    17. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Boston resident who is only a hockey fan (I worked security for the Red Sox in college) you will not find anyone more serious than their sports. Massachusetts is a great state to be in if you don't count the people. Great schools, great hospitals, great place to collaborate but I'd rather commute from NH, though the people there are barely able to think coherently which keeps the taxes low.

    18. Re:The complete list by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      Trust me, though. You're correct about the Red Sox. A more annoying fan base does not exist anywhere, and I'm including Man. U., Arsenal, and Liverpool!

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    19. Re:The complete list by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 1

      I found it interesting that the picture looked like something out of that "Life After People." series I watch now and then.

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    20. Re:The complete list by n4f · · Score: 1

      I also have several friends that have to choose amongst a number of good IT positions. People need to stop paying attention to the media telling them how bad it is, and look at the reality. Michigan and Detroit are very much hit by the recession, more so than most of the country, but there is still opportunity here. Detroit has been my home my whole life, and I wouldn't want to live anywhere else if I could avoid it. Detroit city proper has its problems to be sure, but the industrial feel to the city and the old architecture make it feel different than an other city. There's many great restaurants and hang outs within the city, so despite popular belief there is a nightlife. Also, Detroit has some of the nicest, safest, and richest suburbs of any city in the country.

      Sorry, I always feel the need to defend my home town and state when there are so many negative posts and nearly no positive ones.

    21. Re:The complete list by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      If you're right by the city, you generally want to wander north and west instead of south. South of Boston would be places like Dorchester and Roxbury (not to be confused with West Roxbury, which tends to be one of the wealthiest communities around). West and northwest is areas like Brookline, Brighton (Boston College) Arlington, and Cambridge (MIT, Harvard, Tufts). You do have to be a bit careful that you don't wander too far east from Cambridge, though, or you'll end up in Somerville.

    22. Re:The complete list by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      I didn't understand that either. But one thing I'd mention is that Red Sox games make public transportation (green line) grind to a halt. Can't recall that being much of a problem though with our other sports franchises.

      The Patriots play at Gillette Stadium, which is quite a ways south of the city. The Celtics and Bruins play at the Garden, which is right above North Station, so it's easier for people from outside the city to just take the commuter rail instead of the subway, and it's also closer to the major intersection of the subway lines than Fenway Park is. I also think there are more parking garages near the Garden. Of course, Fenway Park also gets a lot more people going to the games.

    23. Re:The complete list by Altus · · Score: 1

      Anyone who is worried about walking in Somerville after dark has spent too much of their life in the middle of nowhere. Somerville is just the place that students and artists and hard working Brazilian immigrants live because Cambridge is too damn expensive.

      There are plenty of things to complain about with Somerville but its not a dangerous place to live. Davis Sq is one of the nicer spots in the greater Boston area for night life.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    24. Re:The complete list by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Trust me, though. You're correct about the Red Sox. A more annoying fan base does not exist anywhere, and I'm including Man. U., Arsenal, and Liverpool!

      You clearly don't know much about college sports.

    25. Re:The complete list by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my comment about Somerville was more of a friendly poke. Most of Somerville is pretty much like Cambridge. From what I've heard from a few people, though, it gets a bit sketchy the farther away from Cambridge you get. Obviously nothing like Dorchester and Roxbury, though.

    26. Re:The complete list by soundhack · · Score: 1

      I lived in Boston/Cambridge for 11 years while getting my degrees. I liked it a lot when I was that young, but now, in my late 30s, I like it a lot less. Especially after spending 7 years in San Diego. The weather stinks here (the past week has been like Seattle with rains almost everyday, and I'm sure in a month it will get hot and steamy), the people (especially townies) are unfriendly, and there really isn't much to do other than pub/nighclub/movie (I did all the 'cultural' stuff when I was a student, and don't feel the need to do any of that again).

      I'm back here only because of my SO (and now wife) and am just waiting to leave in Sept for a decidedly non-IT job.

    27. Re:The complete list by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I recently was in Boston for the first time on business. I thought it was a great city as there was plenty of good food and night life as well as viable mass transit. Unfortunately there were the downsides too. I thought the city was "old" and "dirtier" than what I am accustomed to in Minneapolis and I definitely didn't feel terribly safe wandering around by myself at night. Would I live there compared to Minneapolis? Probably not but do I see why it's on both the best and the worst, yes.

      I was also recently in Boston for the first time for a few days, and found it wasn't nearly as great as all of the (ex)Bostonians make it out to be. The Subway shuts down at 12am, but bars/clubs don't close until 2am (...seriously, they close?). It also seems to be impossible to get beer at a store after 11pm. My brief stay in New York for a couple days after that was most refreshing...anybody who thinks that Boston is the greatest place in the world is seriously deluded.

      There wasn't anywhere I felt unsafe walking around at night, but I also didn't go out looking for trouble.

    28. Re:The complete list by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 1

      Off the top of my head:

      a) successful sports team = lots of tickets being sold, playoff tickets, memorabilia, etc, etc, leading to lots of tax revenue and a "healthy" local economy. (read: one in which lots of money is flowing)

      b) if the salesman takes the client to the ballgame in the corporate luxury box, it makes the client far more likely to buy if the home team wins.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    29. Re:The complete list by rastakid · · Score: 1

      I don't get this. Does that mean that in the whole city of Detroit there are only 449 jobs available? I mean, for a city with 900,000+ people, that's extremely little.

    30. Re:The complete list by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 1

      You're right (though USC fans are pretty damn annoying).

      OK. A more annoying fan base does not exist anywhere in professional sports.

      --
      Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
    31. Re:The complete list by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      3. Cleveland, Ohio - Jobs available: 211

      Perhaps -- but Cleveland is gonna turn around in no time, thanks to these promotional videos!

      (Full disclosure: I was born and raised in Dayton, one of Forbes magazine's Fastest Dying Cities in America. So it's not like I have any room to throw stones.)

    32. Re:The complete list by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      As a Boston resident who is only a hockey fan (I worked security for the Red Sox in college) you will not find anyone more serious than their sports.

      You haven't met any Pittsburgh fans, have you?

    33. Re:The complete list by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      Pittsburgh and Dallas.

    34. Re:The complete list by drwho · · Score: 1

      I was born in Boston of Boston heritage, but grew up in western Mass, only to move back to Boston as an adult. I have very mixed feelings about the city. It's not a place to pick a well-paying IT job...as long as you have a prestigious degree. The place has a surplus of Harvard/MIT/BU/etc. students and grads. Housing here is not cheap, but many of the buildings are strong and with character, so much unlike other tech hot-spots. There is public transit, and it does work, but is really only viable for night-time transit along the major subway/streetcar lines. The bus system SUCKS, but much of that has to do with the drivers here, who are so aggressive as to make road rage a serious problem.

      The weather here is always pretty humid, so when it gets hot in the summer its nasty. In the winter, daytime temperature rises just enough above freezing to melt the snow a little bit, and then at night drop below freezing and you get ICE. Lots of it! I miss living outside the city where the snow comes just after thanksgiving and stays until just before Easter, and doesn't really get that freeze/thaw thing going on. We have beaches (fresh and salt water) you can actually swim and boat at (the water pollution has declined dramatically), and some of the ones further away from the city aren't too crowded.

      Probably the more anger-provoking thing that happens to you here can be avoided by just avoiding the newspapers and having as little to do with government as possible. From the state capital down to the town halls, they're corrupt and see their jobs as saying "no" unless you give them a big, personal reason to say "yes". It's funny how used to encountering assholes in government offices I've become, that when I was in upstate NY I had some bureaucrats actually trying to help me rather than stymie me. It was refreshing.

      As far as sports go, I HATE SPORTS..I hate Bosox fans the worst. When they 'reversed the curse', the street were raucus and that was something to see, but the townie contingent with their baseball caps just drive me away from places like Dedham.

      Right about now is when you can expect the weather to start getting hot around here, and ugly. but it's been unseasonably Seattle-like for the past few days, and I have no complaints.

      Oh, as far as the age of the city, by US standards it is very old. By European standards not so much. but the average age of architecture in the city and immediate suburbs is probably about 110, which puts in on par with a lot of European cities I've seen. The oldest building in the area was built in 1636 (actually oldest building in English America), and is pretty much the same now as when it was built. Buildings start to be considered historically 'old' if they were built before 1800. It's not that hard to buy a house built in 1780 or so in rural areas.

      New England has some of the most beautiful countryside I have ever seen, and lots of woods and very climbable mountains. If you pick the right time to drive out of the city, you can be there in twenty minutes.

      For the record, I will jump in glee when Ted Kennedy dies. Which undoubtably, is the only way he'll ever leave office.

    35. Re:The complete list by drwho · · Score: 1

      If you commute from NH, you get to pay the very high NH property taxes (because property taxes are the primary source of state revenue, as there is no income or sales tax), but if your employer is in mass, you get to pay the high Mass income tax. Wow! the joy of double taxation?

    36. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't understand why they make a point of stating what qualifies as a city (population over 50,000) and yet, still, put Bentonville (pop 33,000) on the list despite not qualifying as a city by their own standards.

    37. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you consider concrete, pollution, and mutant fish "culture".

    38. Re:The complete list by ponraul · · Score: 1

      There are probably more than 449 IT jobs in Detroit; however, there are only 449 IT jobs listed on Dice.com that are in Detroit.

      Out of curiosity, since Windsor, ON is right across the border from Detroit, is it common to work in Detroit and have residence in Windsor? What is the tax situation? Do you have to pass border control everyday?

    39. Re:The complete list by metlin · · Score: 1

      Umm, sure. Tell that to the South American football teams.

    40. Re:The complete list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but it seems to me its hard to spot the business opportunities (especially in IT). It just seems like every idea I have has already been thought of already 10 times over, or someone is already doing it in your area and you'd have to compete directly.

    41. Re:The complete list by paazin · · Score: 1

      [...] bars/clubs don't close until 2am (...seriously, they close?). It also seems to be impossible to get beer at a store after 11pm.

      Welcome to New England.

    42. Re:The complete list by barzok · · Score: 1

      I used to live & work in Syracuse. Best thing I ever did was get the hell out of there. A few friends of mine used to work out at the Griffis Tech. Park in Rome while living in 'Cuse...maybe even the place you're working now (biggest client is a big DoD contract?).

      At least down I-90 in Rochester, our major development scams^Wprojects are on a smaller scale than Destiny USA (Fast Ferry, Renaissance Square & Midtown Plaza combined are smaller than that clusterfuck).

    43. Re:The complete list by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      The list for people that don't like slideshows:

                      1. Detroit, Mich. - Jobs available: 449
                      2. Bentonville, Ark. - Jobs available: 81
                      3. Cleveland, Ohio - Jobs available: 211
                      4. Syracuse, N.Y. - Jobs available: 49
                      5. Tie: Boston, Mass., and San Francisco, Calif.
                      6. Anytown in Alaska - Jobs available: 24
                      7. Orlando, Fla. - Jobs available: 235

      Karma karma karma karma karma ka-karma whore...

      It's a service, truth be told. When articles like this one are posted, I always scroll down the thread to see if someone has spared me from slideshow purgatory, so I'm always grateful.

      Jeez, whenever I read replies like AC, I can't shake off the image of a joyless, semi-obese yet undernourished teenage kid, reclused in his bedroom most of the time; no matter what's put in front of him, he'll predictably snicker with a hint of bitterness about how lame it is, standout exceptions being a real firearm ("coooool!") and alcohol ("awesome!").

      The prototypical anti-geek geek, he's the kind who, by his twenties, has never gotten laid and yells out "Show us your tits!" from within the safety of numbers and a six pack of Bud. This is around the age when he'll become increasingly convinced that "the Jews are to blame for everything".
      In a nutshell, the political base for the Sarah Palins of tomorrow.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  7. Southern Utah.... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Where a BS in CS or CIT makes 9 bucks an hour and an illegal migrant housing framer makes 30.

    1. Re:Southern Utah.... by Crazy+Man+on+Fire · · Score: 4, Funny

      Stop complaining and buy yourself a hammer

    2. Re:Southern Utah.... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      I stopped fighting supply and demand a while ago... ):

    3. Re:Southern Utah.... by eln · · Score: 1

      In my experience, IT pay sucks throughout the state of Utah, even in Salt Lake. Not sure why that is, but it kept me from settling there, even though I really like the city: Any city will start to suck if you're broke all the time.

    4. Re:Southern Utah.... by Chabo · · Score: 1

      That brings up a question for me: this article talks about "IT", but are they counting the entire computer industry, including engineers and developers, or are do they mean actual IT jobs, like sysadmins and DBadmins?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    5. Re:Southern Utah.... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      buy yourself a hammer

      A hammer wouldn't help... he doesn't speak Spanish.

      --
      That is all.
    6. Re:Southern Utah.... by ElForesto · · Score: 1

      Las Vegas is just as bad. You're either stuck in a call center hell OR you find a buddy in casino IT to get your foot in the door. There's almost nothing in the way of mid-career positions so that you can keep moving up the chain.

      --
      There is a difference between "insightful" and "inciteful" other than spelling.
    7. Re:Southern Utah.... by rhsanborn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The funny bit is that they don't much mention anything about IT. It's almost all about the environment. Alaska has moose, and Syracuse gets too much snow, and Detroit is Detroit, etc, ad nauseum.

    8. Re:Southern Utah.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Um, doubtfull a framer is make 30 an hour, much less an illegal.

      If it is true(again doubtful) then the only reason an employeers would take the risk is because no legal will take the job.

      As a former construction laborer, and current IT professional, I suspect you are full of crap.

      As far as a degree in CS is concerned, maybe you should go to where the work is?
      It would be like me complaining in 1960 that I can't get a good auto manufacturing job in Provo.

      Well, no shit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Southern Utah.... by Chabo · · Score: 1

      The funny bit is that they don't much mention anything about IT.

      Exactly why I'm wondering what they mean. I'm a software developer; when these guys say that Chicago is good for "IT", does that mean I can get a good job there, or would I have to become a sysadmin to work in that city?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    10. Re:Southern Utah.... by Repossessed · · Score: 1

      You should move to northern Utah. You can make 11 instead!

      --
      Liberte, Egalite, Fraternite (TM)
    11. Re:Southern Utah.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      In my experience, IT pay sucks throughout the state of Utah, even in Salt Lake. Not sure why that is, but it kept me from settling there, even though I really like the city: Any city will start to suck if you're broke all the time.

      Salt Lake City was actually ranked by Forbes as the #1 place to work in the U.S., mainly BECAUSE of the IT jobs. The low cost of living in Utah easily offsets any lower pay you raise.

    12. Re:Southern Utah.... by Adm.Wiggin · · Score: 1

      Going to college in Southern Utah for a BS in CS, I can see why. Most of my fellow students are pathetic at best. There are a few exceptional ones, but they are quite far between.

    13. Re:Southern Utah.... by Adm.Wiggin · · Score: 1

      ...and come to think of it, that's been true of every CS class I've ever taken (including classes more northern), and every programming IRC channel or forum I visit. Programmers are a dime a dozen these days, but the wheat is thrown out with the tares.

    14. Re:Southern Utah.... by aclarke · · Score: 1

      No kidding. I LIKE snow, so if I was to move back to the USA, I guess I'd be looking at Syracuse...

      Syracuse is on the doorstep of the Adirondack mountains, and has easy access to great hiking, off-roading, and skiing. Of course, you do have to live in New York State. Last time I drove through upstate New York, saying it looked like a third world country would be an insult to third world countries. There are of course many nice people there, but it seems like a lot of folks have just given up. People live in houses that are literally falling apart and filled past the windows with junk.

      On second thought, I think I'll stay where I am.

    15. Re:Southern Utah.... by rbochan · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing they didn't mention the taxes in upstate NY. If I didn't have family here, I'd be out of here in a heartbeat. This place sucks. 13215.

      --
      ...Rob
      The American Dream isn't an SUV and a house in the suburbs; it's Don't Tread On Me.
    16. Re:Southern Utah.... by thexile · · Score: 1

      He can't afford, you insensitive clod!

  8. Best City: Holland, Michigan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of bath houses and gay bars, plenty of well hung young studs, and of course, the geek compound. It's a linux version of heaven on earth.

  9. Highly subjective is right. by ageoffri · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'd gladly take a position in Alaska. Wide open land with relatively few people. No overbearing State government that can't balance the budget, not much of an immigration problem up there either. Thanks to the oil revenues residents get checks from the State. About the only thing I would miss is being able to take the t-tops off on my Z28 even occasionally in the winter and pretty much all summer long.

    If I had to name a State as worst State it would be California. Land of tax and spend with no fiscal restraint, holder of first county to declare bankruptcy and likely first State to go bankrupt. Of course the single biggest reason to avoid California for me is that about 3/4 of my firearms are unconstitutionally deemed illegal by the State.

    --
    -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    1. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Wide open land with relatively few people.

      Don't forget the hordes of fearsome of mosquitoes.

    2. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tax and spend" is an often flung criticism by republican voters, but what do you describe what Raygun, Bush the 1st and Bush the second all did. Atleast "Tax and Spend" democrats try to balance their budget (Obama aside, who has no chance of both keeping the economy from going straight to hell AND balancing the budget in the short term). Republicans just run around with daddy's (gov) credit card and line the pockets of their buddies with it.

      "Tax and Spend" is better than "Drunken Sailor with a No-limit Credit Card"

    3. Re:Highly subjective is right. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      California would be the perfect state if not for all the Californians. It has just about every type of terrain and climate you could ask for ... but too many Californians passing too many Californian laws.

    4. Re:Highly subjective is right. by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 1

      Well, I laughed that they chose Anchorage as their example for "anytown (sic) in Alaska". The saying around here is that the best thing about Anchorage is that you can drive to Alaska from there.

    5. Re:Highly subjective is right. by eln · · Score: 3, Insightful

      California's problem is not all the "tax and spend liberals", it's that it has the most boneheaded system of government ever devised. It's Constitution is huge and unwieldy, and can be changed by a simple majority vote. Its government can't do anything like raise taxes or cut spending to balance the budget because the referendum system blocks them from doing anything that's unpopular with 51% of the voters.

      California is a great study in why populist democracy is a lousy way to run a huge and complex state.

    6. Re:Highly subjective is right. by wjousts · · Score: 1

      I'd gladly take a position in Alaska. Wide open land with relatively few people. No overbearing State government that can't balance the budget, not much of an immigration problem up there either.

      What about all those Russians that Sarah Palin so bravely keeps us safe from?

    7. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd gladly take a position in Alaska. Wide open land with relatively few people. No overbearing State government that can't balance the budget, not much of an immigration problem up there either. Thanks to the oil revenues residents get checks from the State. About the only thing I would miss is being able to take the t-tops off on my Z28 even occasionally in the winter and pretty much all summer long.

      I'm guessing you've never driven a rear wheel drive car in the snow. Don't. Then there's all the salt on the roads.

      My experience is from Maine, but I can't imagine Alaska would be any friendlier to nice cars. You could trade it for a really nice snowmobile though :)

    8. Re:Highly subjective is right. by JCSoRocks · · Score: 1

      I dunno why you have to bring political parties into it. Tax and spend is absolute garbage regardless of your party. Oregon is primarily a democratic state and they just train wrecked themselves - http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124545298617532789.html

      Good job Oregon government. Way to help out your citizens by jacking up taxes and chasing away businesses rather than cutting back on government crap. We're in a recession. Citizens have no money because they have no jobs. That means the state government gets less money. That means government should also get to spend less money, but in fact it usually means they just invent new taxes.

      --
      You are using English. Please learn the difference between loose and lose; they're, there, and their; your and you're.
    9. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Rolgar · · Score: 2, Informative

      At what point did Reagan or Bush Sr. have a Congress friendly to spending cuts? Answer, never. The House of Representatives was majority Democrats all 12 years they were in office, and the Senate for 6. Even then, it's very difficult for any democratic government to actually cut taxes, because of the people who would lose 'their' job, and complaining from the vocal constituents who feel entitled for the outrageous handouts the government gives. We should have it be mandatory that all departments (other than Defense and Revenue) should have their existence be re-approved every 4 years, one year after the election. Make the departments justify their existence for the funds spent. (Maybe it's a bad idea, and we'll certainly never see it happen, but at least it would be a change, right?)

    10. Re:Highly subjective is right. by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      I find several things rather depressing with your reply. First that it is immediately a Republican vs. Democrat for you and not judging people by their actions. Second that you felt the need to butcher Reagan's name. No where did I say it was limited to R/D as far as the tax and spend attitude goes. Obama is at least justified in his massive deficit spending since prevailing economic theories hold that a key action to break a recession is for Government spending. While I would have liked for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act to have been more front loaded and some of the spending to have gone other places, overall it was the right thing. It has screwed any chance of Obama leaving a legacy of a balanced budget for his first term, but better an unbalanced budget then a depression. I also don't see a difference between tax and spend vs. Drunken Sailor with a No-limit Credit Card. Both are irresponsible methods that need to be cracked down on. If you think that Democrats in power don't line the pockets of their friends and family as often as Republicans do you should pay more attention. Enough people from both sides do it that it is a serious problem but I see no way to change it in the near term. In the long run I would love to see a clearly worded Constitutional Amendment that required a balanced budget from Congress except in cases of formally declared war and certain explicitly worded economic issues such as recession, inflation and deflation.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    11. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha. Yeah, the majority of the budget in the US goes to 3 things: the military, social security, and medicare.

      Find me a congress willing to make significant cuts to any of those 3 things, and I'll find you a congress that'll be out on it's ass in two years or less.

      The rest of the fervor for spending cuts is either dicking around around the edges, or stuff that groups of people don't like (the FDA, the EPA, etc.). Either it's too small to make much of a difference (eliminating the Dept. of Education won't achieve anything substantial, however useless you think it may be), or sane people don't want cut (fuck you, I want the government keeping people from polluting the water and air, and wiping out animal species, you goddamn sociopath.).

    12. Re:Highly subjective is right. by eln · · Score: 1

      The lousy part about a recession is that the state gets less money at the same time more people require state services. The solution is to build up a rainy day fund during good times so we can survive the bad times. Unfortunately, when politicians see a big pile of money they want to spend it, and when the people see a big pile of money in government hands they want a tax cut and a big refund. So, few states have any kind of rainy day fund, and those that do have a woefully inadequate one. Welcome to democracy.

    13. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Ihmhi · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I had to name a State as worst State it would be California. Land of tax and spend with no fiscal restraint, holder of first county to declare bankruptcy and likely first State to go bankrupt. Of course the single biggest reason to avoid California for me is that about 3/4 of my firearms are unconstitutionally deemed illegal by the State.

      As a New Jerseyan, I am absolutely insulted and appalled that you think there's a state in this great nation more corrupt than us!

    14. Re:Highly subjective is right. by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      Actually I have driven several RWD vehicles in the snow. I learned to drive on an 89 Chevy conversion van that was absolutely horrible in snow without out a couple hundred pounds of sand bags. Then I had a 97 V6 Camaro with all-season tires and in the 3 years I had it, there was only one time I couldn't drive it because the snow around Denver got too much. Last car with RWD is my 00 Z28 which has been modified to over 400 rear wheel HP and once I put snow tires on the car it was great in snow up to about 6". The 6" was more from clearance then anything.

      The worst car to drive in the snow I've ever had was a FWD 03 Kia Rio. Only car I ever slid off the road in snow and it had good all season tires on it.

      Now up in Alaska I would want a good 4x4 or AWD for the winter and if far enough north then a snowmobile. I knew a guy who was very far up north and he talked about keeping a snow mobile in the back of his truck. Eventually things would get too snowy and he would leave the truck and use the snow mobile.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    15. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      Hey, if there is enough support for clean food and air (and I'm sure there is), then they will probably get renewed every 4 years.

      On the other hand, if our education performance stays as bad as it is, then we probably need to fire everybody, (re)hire people with new ideas who will take a fresh look at what has gone before.

      As for social security/medicaid, people shouldn't be eligible for benefits until they have less than $10,000 of assets (not counting their home) in their name. No tax free gifts above $1000 should be allowed to circumvent this rule. Without drastic cuts, both of those programs will probably be cut before I can get them in 40 years.

    16. Re:Highly subjective is right. by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Michigan is in the same situation. We've had declining tax revenues for a long time, and have progressively added wonderful taxes like the recent service tax and the dreaded small business tax that discourage entrepreneurs in a state that is bleeding jobs from large businesses. And rather than slash services that were propped up by unsustainably high income from the big three during the steady decline, they raised taxes, and are now in the position of having to make enormous cuts at once, rather than slow budget balancing throughout.

    17. Re:Highly subjective is right. by rhsanborn · · Score: 1

      Except that a healthy part of Social Security and Medicare are covered by separate taxes. Take the operating budget on it's own and start looking at things like 250 billion dollars paid on interest on debt. For comparison, that's almost half of the defense spending. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_federal_budget,_2007

    18. Re:Highly subjective is right. by dkf · · Score: 1

      "Tax and Spend" is better than "Drunken Sailor with a No-limit Credit Card"

      It seems that the alternatives offered are "Tax and Spend" and "Spend but Don't Tax (the rich)". Neither really enthuses me, but aiming to keep income, savings and outgoings balanced seems... well, sane. Sure you can have a debate on the level of services that should be offered, but pretending that cakes can be both had and eaten simultaneously is plain stupid. (Cutting taxes can stimulate the economy and so restore or increase total tax income, but if it has the opposite effect then it's stupid to blindly try doing it again. Flexibility of mindset is more important...)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    19. Re:Highly subjective is right. by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      As for social security/medicaid, people shouldn't be eligible for benefits until they have less than $10,000 of assets (not counting their home) in their name

      Yeah, good way to stop people from saving!

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    20. Re:Highly subjective is right. by L0rdJedi · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because we've had all kinds of problems the entire time that system has been in place.

      Give me a break. I live in California and the system is the only thing that has kept the legislature in check. California is a prime example of why the Socialist experiment is a complete failure. Prop 13 and the 3/4 majority needed to pass a budget is the only thing that has kept taxes low. Without those, many more people would've left the state by now. As it is, people and businesses are leaving in droves. It's no wonder that even with the sales tax increase, revenue is down.

      The legislature needs to get it through their thick skull that the way to increase revenue is to decrease taxes. Until that happens, revenue will continue to fall. Now they're talking about wanting to tax beer and soda to pay for the short fall. Since I don't need either one, I will happily quit drinking both if they do raise taxes on them. Right now I drink about a case of beer every month or two and the same for soda. If they decide to tax them, I will drink none. The fatties who like to suck down a super sized soda are the ones that are going to get hurt by all these policies, not people responsible enough to say "Enough is enough!"

      FYI, the Constitution can be AMENDED by a majority, not outright changed. A significant change can only be made by the legislature, not the people. And the government can raise taxes if they can get a 75% majority of the legislature to go along with it (how do you think they raised the sales tax?). The problem is that there will be a firestorm the likes of which hasn't been seen since Prop 13 was passed if they attempt to repeal Prop 13. I live in this State and I'm the first one to say that it needs to go bankrupt.

      The government needs to get the hell out of all the shit they're involved in. California is a perfect example of what happens when run away government stops listening to the People.

    21. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Without the state oil revenues, Alaska would be having as much trouble as any other state.

      But, if you want to get away from hispanics and blacks with your guns and your bible, Alaska is probably your best bet. There are still some surviving native American tribes, but I'm sure they're well away from where the "real" Americans live. Try to take as many like minded people as you can with you, and be sure to tell Jesus I said hello when he shows up for the rapture.

      And don't worry. We won't let the Russians nuke Wasilla from orbit. Sure we won't...

      Thank you for your bigoted and racist post.

    22. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mosquitos in alaska? they go that far up north? Alaska isn't next to hawaii, you know.

    23. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are right.. populist Democracy sucks... Representative Democracy sucks too... in teh middle would be consensus democr4acy where you have representatives who have the power to make touch choices because any referendum has to pass with 2/3 majorety and some even have a quarum requirment so a low turn out election can't be used to decide important issues if too few of teh registered voters show up (if it isn't important enough for a quarum, then it isn't important)

    24. Re:Highly subjective is right. by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      You only have to worry about that during the summer, all 3 days of it. :)

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    25. Re:Highly subjective is right. by chaim79 · · Score: 1

      I've always had more trouble with FWD in snow than RWD, mainly because I drive a lot in country roads, FWD is supposed to be better in stop-n-go, but it's terrable for long drives that have hills and curves. You let off the gas and you start 'engine breaking', when that happens your front wheels break free from it's limited traction and you've lost all ability to control. With RWD if you let off the gas, start engine breaking, and the rear wheels break free (or step on the gas and the rear wheels break free) you've still got the front wheels to give you a chance of control, not a lot of control but a chance.

      --
      DEMETRIUS: Villain, what hast thou done?
      AARON: Villain, I have done thy mother.
      Shakespeare invents 'your mom'
    26. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      Sssshh! Anything we can do to keep bozos like that out of California is fine by me! Hey everyone, California sux, and nobody with any sense would want to live there! It's a great place to visit (unlike NJ), so come early and come often and bring lots of those nice tourist bux, but just make sure you go home after you're done having fun. :)

    27. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mosquitos in alaska? they go that far up north? Alaska isn't next to hawaii, you know.

      Yes. As you might imagine, the breeding season for the mosquitos is rather short, so they're exceptionally aggressive, especially farther north than Anchorage. I read an article from an old National Geographic magazine which stated that mosquitos can actually kill cattle - seems cows don't have the natural protections of the native large herbivores. Of course, there is some northern limit for mosquitos, but part of Alaska is within their range.

      - T

    28. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2, Funny

      I will go corrupt official toe to toe with you. You can have your Tony Soprano wannabes, and I'll put the city of Detroit against your whole exit ramp infested state! Hell, Monica Conyers has more corruption in her little finger than any five state or local officials you can find.

      The gauntlet has been thrown down!

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    29. Re:Highly subjective is right. by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Dude, it's a 2/3 majority, not a 3/4 majority. And far from "not listening to the People", the initiatives system makes California one of the most responsive to the will of the People. Which is exactly why they're in so much trouble.

      People: We demand that $2B from the general fund be set aside for the education of small puppies.

      Government: OK. That means that uncommitted revenue drops by $2B. We'll have to cut teacher's salaries by 14%.

      People: Idiots! Why do you hate children? We demand that teacher's salaries be increased 5%, not cut.

      Government: Okay, but we'll have to cut housing assistance.

      People: Why do you hate the poor? You may not cut housing assistance.

      Government: We'll raise taxes, then.

      People: We demand that all tax increases be approved by 2/3 of the state senate.

      Government: You do know that means taxes will never go up again, and that you're allowing a tiny, intransigent minority to run the state off a cliff, right?

      People: Why don't you respect the will of the People?

      Prop. 13 has butchered California. Prop. 13 was a conservative brainchild. Congratulations, bozo. You and yours just wrecked 1/5th of the the economy. But I suppose you think your state will be so much better once the schools shut down and Prudential is buying ad space on El Capitan.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    30. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Alaska also has the most corrupt government in the whole damned country. Its governor winds up being investigated by the state legislature for abusing her power. Its senators wind up on trial for taking kickbacks, its congresscritters wind up on trial for taking kickbacks...I'm sensing a theme.

      Also, without all the free oil money, Alaska would have the high taxes that you fear so very much. Enjoy your nonexistent roads, education, and police in whatever tax-free haven state you eventually settle in.

    31. Re:Highly subjective is right. by VAXcat · · Score: 1

      "the referendum system blocks them from doing anything that's unpopular with 51% of the voters"...yes, damn those pesky voters - how are politicians supposed to wield unlimited power and do things that are totally against the will of the governed under these circumstances? Sounds like a horrible situation...

      --
      There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
    32. Re:Highly subjective is right. by SomeGuyFromCA · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Dude. I am bookmarking this. I am showing it to people. And the next time I have mod points, I'm tracking down your posts.

      --
      if the answer isn't violence, neither is your silence / freedom of expression doesn't make it alright
    33. Re:Highly subjective is right. by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      I think he is trying to give the racists and bigots a place where they can be "separate, but equal." Alaska is now the most likely place.

    34. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh!

    35. Re:Highly subjective is right. by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      /. must be slipping, I expected this sort of highly open-minded response to be the very first reply. I even joked with a friend asking him how long before my original was marked troll or flamebait.

      I think I was pretty clear that the Alaskan State budget is doing well because of the oil that is up there. So chances are if there wasn't oil it would be in just as bad of shape as the average State, but I doubt it would be anywhere near as bad as California. Then again maybe not, if there weren't oil a significant amount of the population wouldn't be in the State.

      Now I'm going to blow your enlightened mind with some things I'm sure you won't believe. One can be a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment as a personal right and at the same time despise organized religion. Also when I referenced immigration I should have been more clear that I'm only against illegal immigration and I wasn't the one who picked out specific groups. To me it doesn't matter the color of your skin if you are an immigrant, only one thing matters. Is the immigrant here legally or illegally? If illegally then they should be deported and if caught a second time permanently barred from entering the US or applying for citizenship. If here legally then good for them.

      It is possible for some of us to not blindly follow party lines. It is possible to support the 2nd Amendment and at the same time support marriage between any two consenting adults.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    36. Re:Highly subjective is right. by EricTheGreen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I see your Michigan and raise you my Illinois.

      You're complaining about a piddly-wit mayor? Of our two most recent ex-governors, one is up the river and the other is likely joining him in a couple years. Our junior senator essentially bought his way into the job and got caught. And that's before we even bring Mayor "Chucky" Daley and his bankrupt-the-state 2016 Olympics and endemic "pay to play" city infrastructure contracts into the mix.

      I feel bad for the agony being experienced by MI right now, but you're not even in the same league as the Land of Lincoln in the corruption department. And be grateful for that...

    37. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a New Jerseyan, I am absolutely insulted and appalled that you think there's a state in this great nation more corrupt than us!

      New Jersey isn't really a state. More like a suburb of New York.

    38. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Woldscum · · Score: 0

      As a New Jerseyan, I am absolutely insulted and appalled that you think there's a state in this great nation more corrupt than us!

      WHAT?!

      How about Louisiana. Any one?

    39. Re:Highly subjective is right. by copponex · · Score: 1

      Let's see... California has an economy roughly forty times larger than that of Alaska. California has thirty six million people, and Alaska has six hundred thousand. Take away energy resources, and Alaska would likely be dead least in every metric imaginable. I'd bet without even looking at the statistics that California spends more on road signs than Alaska does on it's entire highway system.

      My point being that it's trivially easy to manage state who's fifth largest town has less than 10,000 people, if that state is also floating in oil revenues.

      And no, you aren't blowing my mind, whether you actually are as open minded as you claim or not. I made a joke, not in the best taste for sure, but it doesn't really matter. Some people laughed. Some people didn't. You got your nuts in a twist because I associated you with other people who defend the right to maintain the world's highest homicide rate, for reasons which I will never understand.

      If you don't like California, fine. Keep yourself and your guns outside the state line. Don't consume any products developed in California - you wouldn't miss out on much, right? Also, you should stop pretending that states whose entire budgets would fit in the margins of California's are run by economic wizards. Least of all, Alaska, which is run by someone who thinks God wanted her to be the governor, and still wants her to be the President.

    40. Re:Highly subjective is right. by baKanale · · Score: 1

      New Jersey isn't really a state. More like a suburb of New York.

      A friend of mine once said that the two biggest cities in New Jersey aren't even in the state, namely New York City and Philadelphia.

    41. Re:Highly subjective is right. by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      Hehe..

      Get used to disappointment. From:
      http://www.nytimes.com/2008/12/14/weekinreview/14marsh.html

      In a Department of Justice tally covering the last decade, Florida wins by its sheer number of guilty. The report, released last week, itemizes convictions in federal public corruption cases at local, state and federal levels in the 50 states, the District of Columbia and three United States territories.

      I live in South Florida and am very used to politicians from city council member to congress folks making excuses for their convictions.

    42. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 1

      Mayor? P'shaw. Kwame's only official crime was getting caught. He just misused city funds, and then became a rather convenient scapegoat / distraction while the rats kept the party going a while longer.

      Now, when you look at the city council, that's a group of people brewing up some good old fashion WTF? You've got Barb Collins, who famously wears a diamond tiara to meetings. Her supporters spontaneously broke into "Onward Christian solders" after she gave a speech equating members of a regional authority formed to takeover operations of Cobo Hall (home of the North American International Auto show, one of the few things that brings money into detroit) from an essentially bankrupt city to white settlers stealing land from "the native peoples."

      Or, there's Martha Reeves (yes, the one from motown's Martha Reeves and the Vandellas). Who's been accused of having city employees earning overtime ferrying her around to the local casinos and billing rooms to her expense account.

      Let's not leave out JoAnn Watson. A recent audit found that her property taxes were between $40 and $60 every six months. All joking about Detroit property values aside, we're talking about a 4 bedroom 3 bath stone house in a nice part of Detroit (stop snickering.) Mrs. Watson stated that she thought the low taxes were due to damage the home suffered in a Tornado, but she couldn't remember if the tornado had damaged her home in 2001 or 1995. That no Tornado has hit that part of Detroit in 50+ years makes no real difference. (as an aside, if my house ever got hit by a tornado, 75 years from that date if I'm still alive I'll be able to tell you the date, time, month, year, temperature, ambient humidity, and the color of the trash bag that I put my freshly destroyed boxer shorts in.)

      But there's always dear, sweet, innocent as the baby jesus, "black people can't be racist" Monica Conyers, wife of US rep John Conyers. (Though I've yet to see them in the same place at the same time. methinks even he knows she's crookeder than a barrel of snakes). Federal indictment over a $6000 bribe? You betcha! Billing trips to Grand Cayman to the Detroit firefighters pension fund? But of course! Accepting upwards of $40,000 worth of jewelry from local pawnshops while reviewing an ordinance to crackdown on pawnshops? All in a day's work, no need to thank her.

      Now, granted, these are petty when compared to selling of senate seats by crooked governors, they are indicative of the amazing level of corruption that really has turned Detroit into a dysfunctional city since Colman Young took office so long ago. The very *culture* of the City of Detroit as a civic institution is corrupt. Epic Corruption isn't just acknowledged but expected at every single level. And it's not just 'skim a little here, or 'whet your beak' there, it's "take every last possible dime you can. Bill everything to the pension funds or anything else that still has money, make sure you hook your family up with every do-nothing job you can find, and don't worry about getting caught. Because someone else is doing stuff that's even worse."

      You guys have "bigger" corruption, but in Detroit, it's systemic.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    43. Re:Highly subjective is right. by winwar · · Score: 1

      "yes, damn those pesky voters"

      The problem IS the voters. They want lots of things but don't want to pay for them. A recipe for disaster.

      At least now they have been forced to chose. Of course it will be less at the same cost....

    44. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Second that you felt the need to butcher Reagan's name.

      In all fairness, I butcher Reagan's name whenever I can, mostly to counter the roving band of tards trying to name every building in DC after him. He was a mediocre president, not a saint.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    45. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama is spending more than four times more than anyone else ever has. Why exactly does he get a free pass?

    46. Re:Highly subjective is right. by squallbsr · · Score: 1

      Which is why I drive FWD with a Manual Transmission...

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    47. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberals have run and ruined California.

    48. Re:Highly subjective is right. by scottv67 · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Then I had a 97 V6 Camaro

      Please accept my most sincere condolences.

    49. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you trying to sound like a cliche? Camaro Z-28 with t-tops, some number of guns (most admittedly illegal in some states), anti-tax, etc. Are you Joe the Plumber's brother?

    50. Re:Highly subjective is right. by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      isn't it arizona that actually had the sitting governor in jail? that's got to be a record low of some kind.

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    51. Re:Highly subjective is right. by Baloo+Uriza · · Score: 1

      You and yours just wrecked 1/5th of the the economy. But I suppose you think your state will be so much better once the schools shut down and Prudential is buying ad space on El Capitan.

      Given California today, they'll never make that back, either. Better jettison them from the union now while they're already down.

      --
      Furries make the internet go.
  10. What? by qoncept · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What a worthless list. What did anything they talked about have anything to do with IT?

    --
    Whale
    1. Re:What? by oodaloop · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean besides the sports teams? What geek doesn't pick the city in which he wants to live based on how their sports teams are doing there?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing, but it would have required time and effort for CIO.com to produce an informative article. Instead it was a lot easier to slap together a list of down-on-their-luck cities, throw in a couple surprises for shock value, apologize in advance for it being "subjective", throw some ads on the pages, and publish.

    3. Re:What? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What a worthless list. What did anything they talked about have anything to do with IT?

      Totally. I want to know which cities have the best (fastest/cheapest/least-restrictive) broadband to the home and have good/free muni-wifi. Which ones have a Fry's or the like, which ones are in states with low/no sales tax and/or don't try to impose "use tax" for mail-ordered toys. Which states don't require fingerprints to get a driver's license. Which cities have a "university culture." Which ones have cheap electricity for the server farm in my basement.

      Those sorts of things are a lot more specific to IT people than the weather and sports franchises.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    4. Re:What? by iamhigh · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's CIO.com, nothing they talk about has anything to do with IT!

      --
      No comprende? Let me type that a little slower for you...
    5. Re:What? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      So, how's the weather up there in Detroit?

    6. Re:What? by maxume · · Score: 1

      In my state (Michigan), if you earn $99,999, you can pay $44 to cover your use tax on all purchases less than $1,000, and then pay 6% on each purchase over $1,000.

      It's pretty inane, but so is worrying about it.

      It sounds like you might like some parts of Washtenaw county though.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    7. Re:What? by _xeno_ · · Score: 1

      Which I have to say, I found hilarious, because they said to avoid San Fransisco because their sports teams haven't won a championship in ages.

      Also, avoid Boston, because their sports teams recently have won championships.

      So, obviously, you want to live some place where the sports teams have never won recently, but are still some of the best in the nation? I'm confused here.

      Of course, I've heard Red Sox fans who seriously complain about the Red Sox winning the World Series: see, it ruined the fan base because younger Red Sox fans don't know the joy of almost winning but failing at the last minute.

      You know what, screw sports. I'm going to back to video games.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
    8. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'number of jobs on dice' metric is worthless when you are comparing a town of 50,000 to a city of 5 million.

      This is just filler, some jackoff sounding off. These are probably cities he couldn't get a date in, or was beat up in, or maybe ate a bad taco.

    9. Re:What? by raind · · Score: 1

      The weather is fine, for you Detroit bashers here are some pluses: we have four seasons here, we have a vibrant music scene. Lake St. Clair and the Detroit river is a awesome fishery.

      People from Ohio come here to go up north which is awesome as well.The only reason people here would go Ohio is Cedar Point.

      --
      Get up!
    10. Re:What? by eldorel · · Score: 1

      Seriously, I would PAY for an analysis like this.
      ($10 or so, but there would have to be a free example given. Perhaps of my home town, that way I can check accuracy.)

      I live in area that fails on all of the points you mentioned, and want to get out of here in the next few years.

      However, the last thing I want to do is move to an area that seems good, but isn't.

      Also, does anyone else ever notice how when you want mod points, you don't have them?

    11. Re:What? by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Informative

      Madison WI. No, seriously. Huge 'university culture', lots of middle/big town conveniences, a liberal city/county government and a moderate state government. I don't know about the broadband situation but I would imagine that with the number of students and young IT people in the area it's probably above average. I don't know what you call 'low' sales tax, but the state rate is 5%.

    12. Re:What? by flewp · · Score: 1

      Madison is consistently ranked as one of the best places to live according to some magazines. (I think Forbes has often listed it in the top 10, and Money Magazine has listed it in the top spot before). Madison also has one of the best employment rates in the country, and also is quite an educated city, having one of the highest percentages of PhDs in the nation. (While that doesn't necessarily mean the people there ARE smarter, it can't really hurt, and at the very least, it probably says that continuing one's education may be a bit easier there?)

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    13. Re:What? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You mean besides the sports teams? What geek doesn't pick the city in which he wants to live based on how their sports teams are doing there?

      It's probably more important to geeks than any other segment. Most people are loyal to their hometown's team regardless of where they move. But geeks tend to follow sports more to fit in.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    14. Re:What? by CRiMSON · · Score: 1

      They did research....

      show me jobs on dice in US cities.. Wow these sucks.. print it up!!

      --
      oogly boogly!
    15. Re:What? by Forbman · · Score: 1

      and, state sales tax AND income tax...

    16. Re:What? by moortak · · Score: 1

      As recently as 2005 Cleveland was the Economist's pick for most livable city in the US tied with Pittsburg. I don't recall Detroit being called a hot destination in my life time.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
    17. Re:What? by mertzman · · Score: 1

      re broadband: in the Madison area for small business and home, not so great, but not terrible either. Big players are the telco DSL services and Charter cable... none of which are particularly cheap, fast, or reliable, but within a tolerable level of service. Very limited areas of the metro area have access to direct fiber services like AT&T UVerse. As for large business and academic connections though, there are some big pipes to tap into... UW and state government have some heavy duty net infrastructure, including extensive linkups to the "Internet2" academic network.

      re taxes: In Dane County (where Madison is located), sales tax is actually 5.5% And if a Regional Transit Authority is created in the not-too-distant future, the plan is to fund that through an additional sales tax (kind of odd to fund an RTA with sales tax, but that's a different conversation all together). Anyways, 5.5 is cheap compared to the exorbitant sales taxes to be found around Chicagoland.

      Madison is often a highly rated place to live and work, but lots of us who live here consider it a bit overrated... Wisconsin winters detract from the city's charms a whole lot. :)

    18. Re:What? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      People from Michigan come here to go on vacation. :-P

  11. Detroit has Compuware by javacowboy · · Score: 1

    I used to work for Compuware (Detroit based), but this was at the Montreal office and I never had to travel to the head office. Still, this is an example of an IT company that's based out of Detroit. They sell software and consulting, and I think they got started by providing IT consulting to GM.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
    1. Re:Detroit has Compuware by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I think they got started by providing IT consulting to GM.

      No, they didn't. Prior to about 2004, they had a sole source of IT consulting going back to the 1980s: EDS.

  12. umm DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Okay considering the highly biased source, CIO feeds my PHB's delusions of grandeur and our waste bin, it is not surprising to see that DC missed the list. Personally I'd rather deal with Moose than the crime, both lobbyists and drug dealers or 115" of snow rather than the humidity in DC.

    1. Re:umm DC by jimbobborg · · Score: 1

      DC was on the list of Best Places, as there are a LOT of IT jobs in the area. I'd personally love to move to Alaska, but not until after my daughter graduates from college and/or I get married again.

    2. Re:umm DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd personally love to move to Alaska, but not until after my daughter graduates from college and/or I get married again.

      This is /. There is absolutely no way you could have a daughter, because you've never had sex (unless it was paid?), and you were never married.

    3. Re:umm DC by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      ...(unless it was mail order?)

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    4. Re:umm DC by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      DC was on the list of Best Places, as there are a LOT of IT jobs in the area.

      Jobs may be plentiful, but the living costs suck. I live in Northern VA at the moment, but planning to GTFO as soon as my lease is up - looking forward to owning a house for less than what it takes to rent a 1.5 bedroom condo here.

    5. Re:umm DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The daughter was mail order, right?

    6. Re:umm DC by Bigbutt · · Score: 1

      I lived in the DC metro area for 30 or so years. Mt Airy, Odenton, Laurel, Alexandria, Woodbridge, Dale City, Stafford, Falmouth, Fredericksburg, and Spotsylvania as well as Ft Meade and Ft Belvoir. The traffic there is what makes it the worst. If you want to get out and do anything, you have to leave the house before 8am or you're stuck in a slow down. And riding around in Woodbridge/Dale City had you waiting at lights two or three cycles before getting through.

      We moved to a state with less traffic and a slightly lower cost of living. I bought a house that's twice the size my house was in Dale City for almost half as much as it sold for _and_ I bicycle to work now (4.6 miles from work).

      My IT salary isn't quite where it was in 2004 when I left but I was being over paid a bit anyway.

      [John]

      --
      Shit better not happen!
    7. Re:umm DC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think he was referring to the bride being mail order. "You were never married (unless it was mail order?)"

  13. Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by heffy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't mind working in Alaska - lots of fresh seafood, cheap real estate, small town feel - if I can be sure my job is secure. Just like working in IT in some small midwest town, there aren't many options for switching jobs if you need to switch. How many large companies are hiring if you're an Oracle DBA in Alaska?

    That's the beauty of Silicon Valley. I can work at a company for a few years and move to another, similarly-sized company at a higher position without much hesitation or worry. There are hundreds, maybe thousands of small companies looking at hiring IT folks. That kind of job security is what makes California much more appealing than a smaller city.

    1. Re:Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      I would call it job liquidity, not job security. But this is the reason I am trying to move to Silicon Valley from this midwestern town. Well, that and the fact that I will be surrounded by brilliant people rather than average joes...

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by vertinox · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind working in Alaska - lots of fresh seafood, cheap real estate, small town feel - if I can be sure my job is secure.

      Deal Breaker: Lack of broad band

      How else am I going to spend those 6 weeks of darkness in 50 degree below weather.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Anchorage and the other larger towns have DSL and cable just fine. Oh, and Anchorage has a large number of good sushi bars for its size.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many large companies are hiring if you're an Oracle DBA in Alaska?

      The State Of Alaska needs Oracle DBAs, like yesterday.

    5. Re:Alaska is nice - if you can keep a job by Fnordulicious · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the pay is for MS Access DBAs.

  14. Funny to say the least. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an IT professional in Orlando #7 on the list, I can say there are plenty of IT jobs here, just maybe not at this very moment. Housing is cheap, temp is HOT HOT, and the pay scale for IT who knows their shit is high. That's why I moved here a few years ago, to get paid what I'm worth and spend less to live. Viva la Florida!

    1. Re:Funny to say the least. by downix · · Score: 1

      I'm an IT professional on the I4 corridor as well. To say this is a good spot is lying through your teeth. The infastructure to support IT is woeful, network disruptions commonplace, and the structure needed to work is aging to the point of obsolescence. In short, IT in Florida is a joke. Professionals which would be paid $35/hr in any area of the country get paid $9/hr here.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    2. Re:Funny to say the least. by neurovish · · Score: 1

      Maybe try Price Waterhouse, Raymond James, HSN, SAIC, Lockheed, IBM, CAE, Gunn Allen, Disney?

  15. San Francisco by Skyshadow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I love that San Francisco made the list -- I was just thinking last night about how I love everything about San Francisco except for the idea of living there. I'll take the Oakland hills any day and twice on Tuesday.

    I'm starting to wonder about California overall. The entire state is slowly sliding downhill (and not in a earthquake-into-the-ocean sense) thanks largely to the proposition system where any shitheaded idea can be made law by a simple majority vote -- I mean, if you ever need evidence that direct democracy is a terrible idea, look no further than CA.

    Institutionalized gay bashing? Check. Costly mandates we have no way to pay for? Check. And then there's my personal favorite, a short-sighted effort to limit property taxes whose only real effect is to hurt younger people just starting out and drive the schools into the shitter? You know it.

    I mean, maybe having worked with users for all these years, it's a little more obvious to me that people are (by and large) stupid assholes, but I feel there's enough evidence to convince any reasonable person at this point. Which is why we still have the proposition, I suppose.

    --
    Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    1. Re:San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love that San Francisco made the list -- I was just thinking last night about how I love everything about San Francisco except for the idea of living there. I'll take the Oakland hills any day and twice on Tuesday.

      Then you're stuck driving everywhere like a lame donkey. The automobile-required lifestyle is detrimental to the human and natural environment, and I hope you don't (ever) drive into San Francisco.

    2. Re:San Francisco by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Peopel are not stupid, they are smart. Surprisingly so; however they are shortsighted and/or selfish.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:San Francisco by L0rdJedi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Institutionalized gay bashing? Check.

      That's what you're calling defining marriage now? So it's cool for 3 or 4 or 5 people to "marry" each other (yes, it will lead to that, people are doing it in other areas of the country). Got it.

      It's called gay bashing when you disagree, but it's called tolerance when I disagree, right? I have to tolerate it while you can just call me a bigot, right?

      And then there's my personal favorite, a short-sighted effort to limit property taxes whose only real effect is to hurt younger people just starting out and drive the schools into the shitter? You know it.

      Exactly how does that hurt young people? I'm fairly young and I had no trouble paying my way through community college and only a little trouble buying my first house (that was mostly due to the over inflated cost of houses). As a matter of fact, the bank approved us for far more than we could afford, but since we were responsible, we bought in for far less. Now instead of having trouble making mortgage payments, we're doing just fine. And private schools seem to be doing quite well. In fact, we spend more per pupil than any other state, yet we have the worst schools. Why is that?

      Prop 13 passed with 65% of the vote (70% voting), so it was hardly a simple majority that passed it. The reality is that the legislature then, like now, was completely out of control and this is what stopped them.

    4. Re:San Francisco by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Exactly how does that hurt young people?"

      Proposition 13 keeps the taxable value of a property at or near its value at the time of sale. An older couple who bought their house in the 1960s for $20K pays very little in property taxes, even as its value goes up to the $400K range.

      This means that the last people to buy into the real estate market (read: young people) shoulder the bulk of property taxes.

      It also pushes the tax burden away from businesses, who are more likely to hold on to properties for several decades. Also, if a company wants to get rid of a property, they can deed the property instead, retaining technical ownership without triggering the re-evaluation.

      It also pushes the tax burden away from the rich (who are far more likely to own property) and towards sales taxes which hit the poor harder. Since younger generally equals poorer, that also hurts young people.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    5. Re:San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you disagreeing with polygamy? You bigot.

    6. Re:San Francisco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, a re-assessment can happen any time the values significantly change. Also, Prop. 13 allows a 2% growth in property tax per year. So the whole idea that taxes stay at or near its value at the time of sale is bullshit.

      The only real PROBLEM Prop. 13 brings is that government taxes are limited to very slow growth. And that's only a problem if you want a nanny state where the government grows by leaps and bounds.

      The solution is for the legislators to stop with the 22% pay raises for the prison guards, and stop the funding of marketing programs to promote rice, etc., and to stop paying for empire building within government departments at the expense of basic services. Do we REALLY need a separate department of pesticide regulation duplicating the functions within the Agriculture department? Did the County courts REALLY need to merge and blow 4x the budget on infrastructure? You do know that the California Lottery brought in an extra $400 million the first year 'for the schools' and the next fiscal year the education budget had its General Fund component reduced by $400 million, right? The "lottery money for the schools" goes to pay for anything but the schools. You did know that, right?

      The claim that California would be better without Prop. 13 would be like teaching meth addicts how to break into homes. Sure, it might make the meth addicts happier, but ultimately it will be YOU that pays the price.

    7. Re:San Francisco by digitalhermit · · Score: 1

      And then there's my personal favorite, a short-sighted effort to limit property taxes whose only real effect is to hurt younger people just starting out and drive the schools into the shitter?

      We had a similar thing in Florida called SaveOurHomes.

      Here's my take on it though..

      There's been a lot of real estate speculation in Florida up until the bottom fell out last year. This had the effect of artificially driving up property taxes for all sorts of people.

      Most annoyingly, those folks who didn't speculate on housing, who didn't contribute to the real estate hysteria, found themselves unable to pay the rapidly rising property taxes. They got driven out of their homes and their homes snatched up anyway, even if they had opted to stay away from the hysteria.

      SaveOurHomes was a way of limiting the property tax increases over the years.

      The problem was that the state got very greedy. With all these revenues from the ballooning real estate market, they overspent themselves. When it went bust, cities and counties had sudden revenue issues.

      Now they are repealing SaveOurHomes because of the massive budget shortfalls.

      Because of the bubble, housing prices are grossly inflated. Now people who were financially responsible are going to pay the penalty for all the people speculated. Doesn't sound fair to me.

      The need for the young and/or first-home buyers to have affordable *first homes* is important. That's why there are homestead acts throughout the country (Florida included). These homestead acts reduce property taxes for your primary home.

    8. Re:San Francisco by hab136 · · Score: 1

      That's what you're calling defining marriage now? So it's cool for 3 or 4 or 5 people to "marry" each other (yes, it will lead to that, people are doing it in other areas of the country). Got it.

      Why should the government define marriage? And why should I care whether people practice polygamy?

      It's called gay bashing when you disagree, but it's called tolerance when I disagree, right? I have to tolerate it while you can just call me a bigot, right?

      What? Are you saying you should be able to be intolerant without being called such?

    9. Re:San Francisco by Skyshadow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what you're calling defining marriage now? So it's cool for 3 or 4 or 5 people to "marry" each other (yes, it will lead to that, people are doing it in other areas of the country). Got it.

      It's called gay bashing when you disagree, but it's called tolerance when I disagree, right? I have to tolerate it while you can just call me a bigot, right?

      Prop 8 changed the state constitution to take away the right of gay people to get married. It was a purposely and specifically targeted assault on the rights of a minority.

      You want to "protect marriage"* from all the horrors of those icky homos who have the gall to love each other and think that they deserve the same legal protections that those of us who happen to love members of the opposite gender are entitled to, then that's your right. But don't sit there and act all offended because I called a spade a spade -- there's absolutely no logical reason why the government should not allow gay people to get married, ergo you're a bigot for supporting removal of their rights.

      * And what a great phrase that is, eh? I love how it implies that marriage is somehow under assault, like it's going to change somehow if we allow 'dem queers to get hitched. Thing is, though, I sure didn't notice a change in my marriage when same-sex couples were getting married at city hall....

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    10. Re:San Francisco by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Exactly how does that hurt young people?

      You're joking, right? Limiting prop tax growth strangles the schools over time, and means that you pay up to 9 times as much as your neighbor because he's been there 30 years. Now they're proposing allowing inherited property to continue the tax freeze.

      Prop 13 passed with 65% of the vote (70% voting), so it was hardly a simple majority that passed it.

      So what? It's long term suicide.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    11. Re:San Francisco by Racing_Turtles · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you're a bigot per se, but the fact that you draw some parallel between gay marriage and polygamous marriage, suggests that you're dumb. The two are totally unrelated and, moreover, the one is certainly not leading to the other.

    12. Re:San Francisco by guacamole · · Score: 1

      State constitution never gave the right for gays to get married to begin with, since it was never the intention of the original authors to protect the gay marriage. Yes, it does not spell it out, because more than 150 years ago, it could not occur to the founders of the state of California that today people will try to abuse the language of the constitution to get the state to recognize gay marriage. To make Prop 8 unconstitutional, its opponents first need to actually amend the constitution to protect gay marriage.

  16. I live in Orlando and it's not that bad. by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ok, so I have lived and worked in IT in Orlando for the past 10 years and on top of it all, I work from home. Trust me on this, there is nothing that beast working out by the pool in January in T-shirt and shorts and a cold one.

    And climate, well.. for 9 months of the year, the climate is perfect, warm and not humid. For three months, July-September, it's hot and humid and that is also the peak of hurricane season. But I prefer 95F and an occasional hurricane over months of waist deep snow and below zero . Hacking ice of the windshield before freezing on my way to work is way too overrated!

    Not to mention that I can see each shuttle and rocket launch from my living room!

    --
    If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
    1. Re:I live in Orlando and it's not that bad. by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      You've got it made, I think!

  17. There's a reason Charleston, SC is called... by gishzida · · Score: 1

    The Low Country:

    22 Jobs on Dice, an undereducated populace, and as the birth place of hellfire and damnation, a polite familiarity with the Nether Regions.

    A place the only The Fallen One can love.

    1. Re:There's a reason Charleston, SC is called... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Low Country:

      yes it's called "geography"

  18. Please define "Work In IT" by rodrigoandrade · · Score: 1

    If we're talking sexy IT companies like Microsoft, Google, Apple, Sun, then you won't find much outside cites in California.

    But say, Houston, has (had, when I lived there) lots of good IT jobs, obviously serving the oil industry. But they were still great jobs.

    1. Re:Please define "Work In IT" by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      If we're talking sexy IT companies like Microsoft, Google, Apple, Sun, then you won't find much outside cites in California.

      If you're talking "sexy" IT companies like those mentioned above, then you won't find much "outside" at all. After your long days working inside the climate controlled buildings, who has time for anything other than sleep?

      --
      That is all.
    2. Re:Please define "Work In IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we're talking sexy IT companies like Microsoft, Google, Apple, Sun, then you won't find much outside cites in California.

      I think I can find a good sized federal division for each of those. Then there's all the gigantic defense contractors, and government institutions. Tell someone you work for the Executive Office of the President, or the Senate.. not the state one. Talk about navigating the Pentagon. Way more sexy jobs if you ask me! You might even get to work at one of the many places that isn't on Google Maps. I don't know why the DC area is overlooked so much, it is an IT juggernaut. Housing prices and traffic rank with the worst, but it will never run out of sexy, well paying jobs.

    3. Re:Please define "Work In IT" by KeithJM · · Score: 1

      If we're talking sexy IT companies like Microsoft ... then you won't find much outside cites in California.

      I think Microsoft hires a couple of people in some suburb of Seattle.

    4. Re:Please define "Work In IT" by TheSync · · Score: 1

      If we're talking sexy IT companies like Microsoft, Google, Apple, Sun, then you won't find much outside cites in California.

      And the sexiest are in Los Angeles. I mean, companies with good-looking people who work out, know how to dress, and can party :) I'm no fashion snob, but even I get tired of the "SF plaid and sweats" scene...

      Sure, west side of LA has a lot of vacuous people and nutty entertainment politics, but if you know what you are doing out here you are in demand. Plus the LA weather is perfect year-round, and there is plenty of hiking in the urban mountains, outside dining at restaurants, and such.

      Just get used to the valet parking and wear your sunscreen...

    5. Re:Please define "Work In IT" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of gangs, crime, poverty, racial tension, and other problems in LA. I know, because I was born and raised there. I go back to visit, but I would never go back there to live.

    6. Re:Please define "Work In IT" by TheSync · · Score: 1

      Lots of gangs, crime, poverty, racial tension, and other problems in LA

      Well, of course I'm not talking about the area south of Pico or east of La Brea ;)

  19. Bentonville? by shystershep · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish they'd enlightened us as to some of their 'subjective' reasons for their choices. The Northwest Arkansas metro area (Fayetteville, Springdale, Bentonville & Rogers) regularly makes the top ten of 'best places to live' lists. It's not New York, if that's your thing, but then they listed Boston & SF, too, so WTF?

    --
    The bigotry of the nonbeliever is for me nearly as funny as the bigotry of the believer. - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Bentonville? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NWA is a great place to live (I spent 7 years there and loved it).

      Bentonville, though? They might have renamed it "working in one of the strangest, most totalitarian IT cultures" around, ie. Wal-Mart.

    2. Re:Bentonville? by Herkum01 · · Score: 1

      The worse thing you can do is move some place realize you don't like the job after a few years and your only option for finding a new job is to move again. If you are not happy working for Wal-Mart in Bentonville, or you get laid-off good luck finding another position there for someone else.

    3. Re:Bentonville? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Springdale, and seeing the words "metro" and "Northwest Arkansas" in the same sentence game me a chuckle. :)

    4. Re:Bentonville? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was in Bentonville area just last year doing work (not IT). There are a lot of cities and towns in that region all within easy commuting distance from each other. It's not a black hole with a single employer and no escape freeways. There are plenty of other places in the US that better match that description. Perhaps CIO.com seems to think that everything has to be crammed into a huge city to be a good place to work, or they don't realize that you can cross city borders on your commute.

    5. Re:Bentonville? by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Ugh. I can't believe that anyone would consider that area "liveable". I've been there. There's no road system at all, just the same old country roads built for when the area had 1/100th of its current population. The result is 20 miles of bumper-to-bumper traffic snaking through cornfields and chicken ranches (and housing developements that were conrfields and chicken ranches yesterday) just to get to the nearest convienence store.

      On top of that there's pretty much no public transit, nothing is walkable, and the area has no culture at all outside of Wal-Mart culture.

      On the plus side, AQ Chicken has got to be the best fried chicken place in the world. If you think you've found better, I don't believe you.

    6. Re:Bentonville? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having worked for 2 years in Bentonville at Wally-World in IS, I totally agree with it being on the top 10 worst list. The area is great, I now work for another large company in the "metro" area (450K in the area) and it's great. The reason Bentonville would make this list probably has more to do with the main employer that with the city or the area. Home prices are great, unemployment is still the lowest in the nation (5.3% in April for Benton County). Work for any other company in the area and you'll love it. While it is the biggest option, it's not the only option.

      Wally World IS is a miserable place to work: minimum 45 hour workweek (It was usually 50 for me and sometimes as much as 80 hours), no such thing as "reasonable" personal use of the internet and no sense of teamwork. It's about driving your project to get done, no matter who you step on to get there. Everyone is so overworked that you have to make them look bad before they'll give any assistance in making your project successful. Not a fun environment.

    7. Re:Bentonville? by JDevers · · Score: 1

      What you say does apply to some of the towns here, but not to all. Fayetteville for instance has a pretty decent and mostly free public transportation system for a city its size and is very walkable and quite full of its own culture.

    8. Re:Bentonville? by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was in Bentonville area just last year doing work (not IT). There are a lot of cities and towns in that region all within easy commuting distance from each other. It's not a black hole with a single employer and no escape freeways. There are plenty of other places in the US that better match that description. Perhaps CIO.com seems to think that everything has to be crammed into a huge city to be a good place to work, or they don't realize that you can cross city borders on your commute.

      I live down in the River Valley in the Fort Smith area and totally agree with you. Walmart is not the only game in town. The Fayetteville/Springdale/Bentonville area is blowing the Fort Smith area totally out of the water as far as growth is concerned. Lots of things to see and do. Wouldn't mind living up there myself if I could find a job that pays better than what I am currently doing. Rush hour traffic does suck up there, though.

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    9. Re:Bentonville? by Fulminata · · Score: 1

      I don't know what criteria they used, but having lived most of my life in NWA, I can give you a few reasons why Bentonville could be considered bad for IT workers:

      1) Payscale: you're going to be making less than you would doing an equivalent job in a different market. This goes for almost any job you work in the area.

      2) Cost of Living: this is the justification for the lower payscale, and housing, taxes, and gas are cheaper here than in California, but everything else is the same or more expensive. Admittedly, housing and taxes can be a huge chunk, but not enough to justify the payscale differences. Of course the cheaper gas is nice because of number 3...

      3) Public Transportation: there is none. You're lucky if there's even a sidewalk all the way to where you want to go. There is one company that provides limited options, but it focuses on serving the elderly, so isn't an option if you want to use it to commute to work.

      4) Job Opportunities: there are none if you're dissatisfied with your current position. Most, if not all, of those 81 jobs are going to be with Wal-Mart, so if you don't like working for them you're most likely going to have to move to find a new job.

      5) Dry County: seriously, you can't buy alcohol in a retail store anywhere in the county. This might sound OK if you don't drink, but it means that everyone who does has to drive outside the county to go buy their alcohol, and many decide to sample a bit before driving back.

      6) Not Really A City: last time I checked, the city of Concord, CA had a greater population than the entire NWA metro area. Bentonville has a population of 32,000.

      7) Shopping: there's a surprisingly large selection of shopping opportunities given the population, but that doesn't extend to the stores many tech geeks like to shop at. No Apple store, no Fry's and nothing that comes close. If you want to buy tech supplies in a retail store you're pretty much stuck with Best Buy.

      8) Diversity: there isn't a lot, at least compared to other areas of the US.

      I'm sure I could think of others given time. Don't get me wrong, it isn't a terrible place to live, and I could give a long list of good things about the area, but I agree with the article that it wouldn't be a great place for most IT workers that I've known.

  20. Can't believe New Orleans didn't make the list by siliconincdotnet · · Score: 1

    Out of the 68 open positions on Dice for New Orleans, a significant percentage of them aren't even IT at all (engineering). Add in the crime problem, government corruption, terrible streets, and high'ish cost of living, and I'd think it would come in at #1 on the list.

    --
    Insert witty .sig here
    1. Re:Can't believe New Orleans didn't make the list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All those things could also be said about Jackson, MS.

      (Ask me how I know.)

    2. Re:Can't believe New Orleans didn't make the list by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Out of the 68 open positions on Dice for New Orleans, a significant percentage of them aren't even IT at all (engineering). Add in the crime problem, government corruption, terrible streets, and high'ish cost of living, and I'd think it would come in at #1 on the list.">

      I'll agree in NOLA that IT jobs are very LIMITED, but, I very much love living here. Sure you have to put up with the bad streets, but, aside from that, the culture, the food and all that goes on here makes life a BLAST...especially if you are a single adult. If I had family and kids, I'd probably have to move to the northshore for the schools (no way I'd send a kid to public school down here).

      As for crime, well, like always, in general if you're not out trying to buy crack near the projects, you likely aren't gonna get robbed, killed or mugged.

      High cost of living?? I mean, unless you have having to pay for private schools for your kids, I find just the opposite, it is quite CHEAP to live here. Groceries and booze are much cheaper that what I find in the rest of the US. Hell, being a port city, we get a lot of good stuff...fresh produce, meat and you can't beat the place for seafood. Heck, I often get friends dropping off bags of free fresh shrimp 'cause they just have too much for their freezer.

      And I've been here so long...that I would really miss the concept of a to go cup so you can take your drink with you out of the bar. The fact that you can buy beer, wine and booze 7 days a week...at a GROCERY store is amazing.

      And I remember a few years back...something to the effect that in the New Orleans area alone, there are something like 64 or more planned annual festivals. There are only 52 weeks in a year.

      There is always something going on down here with music, food and fun. Sure there are trade offs, but, I and most everyone I know loves living here.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  21. In this economy... by DesScorp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...the worst cities are those with no jobs. The best cities are the ones with jobs. If you want to pay your bills, you go where the jobs are.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
  22. What kind of list of worst cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    doesn't include Troy, NY? Or Urbana, IL? Or Waco, TX?

    Or how about Washington, DC? Hint: IT guys are low on the totem pole, and politicians, lobbyists, and AOL execs let you know it.

    And San Francisco is a BAD place to work? Sounds like these guys sampled the local flora. Hint: if it really did suck, real estate prices would be as in Detroit or Cleveland. And if traffic really is the issue, what about Atlanta, Dallas, and Los Angeles?

    FWIW, Cleveland and Pittsburgh aren't THAT bad. And yes, I do mean it. It's been 40 years since the Cuyahoga burned, and it's actually kinda nice now. As is the Erie waterfront.

    1. Re:What kind of list of worst cities by afidel · · Score: 1

      Heck Cuyahoga valley national park is the second most visited park after Grand Canyon national park. We have a low cost of living here so if you do have a good IT job your buying power is plenty strong. An example of that buying power that blows some of my west coast colleagues minds is I have a 1200sq ft place on 1 acre in one of the best school districts in the state and my mortgage+insurance+taxes is just over $900/month.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:What kind of list of worst cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live on a 50+ acre farm 30 minutes outside of Pittsburgh.

      My mortgage is less than what it would cost to rent an apartment in Silicon Valley.

    3. Re:What kind of list of worst cities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re: San Francisco (and Boston) it's kind of like the Yogi Berra quote "Nobody goes there anymore; it's too crowded."
      Yes, these are great places to live and work in IT - but everybody knows that, and too many people competing for the same jobs and real estate is starting to make them suck. It's a self-limiting behavior.

  23. Orlando??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Orlando has:

    1) Huge Tech Park near University of Central Florida, Siemens, Lockheed Martin, NASA.
    2) Thriving and growing downtown
    3) Plummeting real estate prices
    4) Beaches 45 minutes away, probably the highest concentration of theme parks in the world, tons of activities and night life.
    5) Great shopping
    6) Growing affluent upper middle class

    Let me summarize: Tons of tech jobs, tons of things to do, CHEAP cost of living

    1. Re:Orlando??? by bondjamesbond · · Score: 0

      Sounds like Dallas, except for the beaches part.

  24. The worst NON-US cities to work in IT . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    . . . these stories will be definitely much more amusing. C'mon . .. let's hear 'em, from our overseas folks:

    Lack of titty-bars in Riyadh? Being offered a rat for dinner in Beijing, and being told that it is a "big mouse"? Water cooling your CPUs with raw sewage, which comes from the same source as the drinking water?

    There MUST be some really god-awful places on this planet for IT work, that makes Detroit and their Ohio pals pale in comparison.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  25. Snarky indeed... by merc · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live and work in San Francisco and quite frankly I love it. I've never experienced any of the issues the article claims plague our city (I'm not sure what iJacking is, but my eye sockets are just fine).

    --
    It's true no man is an island, but if you take a bunch of dead guys and tie 'em together, they make a good raft.
    1. Re:Snarky indeed... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I live and work in San Francisco and quite frankly I love it. I've never experienced any of the issues the article claims plague our city (I'm not sure what iJacking is, but my eye sockets are just fine).

      I agree. And did TFA say that the traffic is bad in SF? Apart from the Bay Bridge toll plaza backup, the traffic in SF flows just fine. I don't know what that author is smoking.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Snarky indeed... by Quikah · · Score: 1

      traffic on 101 is bad during rush hour. It is pretty run of the mill rush hour traffic though. Nothing like the near 12-hr long gridlock that the LA area has.

      --
      Q.
    3. Re:Snarky indeed... by Omniscient+Lurker · · Score: 1

      Most people only have TV to compare SF to. As someone who has had the displeasure of having to drive through SF I can say that is is the same as any major city, i.e. terrifying.

    4. Re:Snarky indeed... by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I really don't see what's the big deal about driving in SF. Apart from listening to the impatient honking of the scum-of-the-earth taxi drivers who I hate with a passion, it's really easy to drive in.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    5. Re:Snarky indeed... by Omniscient+Lurker · · Score: 1

      Two people trying to merge into me at the same time, from each side, while a person tailgates me. The highway is terrible, of course it is in all states.

    6. Re:Snarky indeed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up, the only thing that bugs me about walking around the city are all the impatient taxi drivers that have nothing better to do than honk their horns at each other.

  26. Already done by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 2, Informative

    I live here, and I've got a friend who works for SourceForge ... I'm not sure in what capacity, though. There's definitely a demand for people with technical skills. There's also ample opportunities for infrastructure development if you're interested in the hardware side of things. The state is working pretty hard to improve broadband access (http://www.newsminer.com/news/2009/jun/21/fairbanks-representative-hopes-highlight-lack-alas/ and http://www.newsminer.com/news/2009/mar/16/internet-companies-hope-stimulus-boon-bush/).

    1. Re:Already done by Nethead · · Score: 1

      A few years ago my wife and I worked with ACS (the telco) on a project. I met some of the best ISP folks working there. Great people with killer skills. Would I live there? No. I enjoy my Indian fishing village here in Washington State just fine, thank you. Would I go up for a few months and work with them again? Hella yeah!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  27. Silicon Valley too (sort of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    San Fran is close enough to San Jose.

    1. Re:Silicon Valley too (sort of) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Jose, where the men are men and so are the women

  28. LAZY! by The+Yuckinator · · Score: 1

    Did I miss it? When did the "top ten" list get watered down to "top seven"? Too lazy to dig up three more crappy towns?

    1. Re:LAZY! by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did I miss it? When did the "top ten" list get watered down to "top seven"? Too lazy to dig up three more crappy towns?

      In this economy, all internet posts are being cut down by 30%. Or more as in

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  29. Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is all you need to know, math guys: Syracuse holds the title for the U.S. city (pop: 50,000+) with the highest average annual snowfall (115 inches), besting even Anchorage, Alaska (114 inches). It also has a bit of a problem with Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD) due to all that snow and not a lot of sunshine. It's called the Salt City: A good thing, since there's all that snow and ice on the roads.

    Available IT jobs in Syracuse (as posted on June 18 on Dice.com): 49

    I'm tired of seeing people endlessly trash Upstate because of what they read about the winter. What the summary doesn't tell you about the 115 inches of snow is that you rarely have more than 10 inches on the ground at a time; the weather trends for this area lately have seen snow coming primarily on the leading edge of warm fronts in the winter. The result of this is of course you'll shovel your driveway on Monday and then put on sunglasses and a very light coat by Wednesday. In reality every winter in Upstate New York has been near-record warmth for the past several years, and after the short winter season (only about 3 months in reality) the rest of the year is temperate.

    That said, the economy of Upstate New York does leave something to be desired; but that can be said for many other parts of the country as well.

    But I might be brought to disembowel the next person who reads about Upstate New York and then trashes it over weather that they have not experienced for themselves.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The other point to note is that in my experience (in Rochester, NY), upstate New York actually knows how to handle snow. The roads are clear and safe to drive 99% of the time, with plows deployed the moment snow starts sticking. Contrast with, say, D.C. or Seattle (both of which I've experienced) which regularly run out of salt, fail to plow many streets for up to a week, etc. And of course, the drivers in D.C. and Seattle don't know how to deal with snow/ice: at the first flake, ancient reptilian instincts cause them to drive straight into trees, jersey barriers, other cars, etc.

      So yes, there's more snow, but it's not an additional inconvenience, as long as you don't mind the cold in the first place.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Pffft. If people cared the facts, we'd have little to talk about here and action movies would be 10 minutes long.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    3. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by sanosuke001 · · Score: 1

      I live in Syracuse and the winters are really not that bad. As the parent stated, the snow either comes in gradually where it isn't an issue or in huge piles where you deal with it for a couple days and then it just sits on the side of the road. Also, as parent also said, the last few years have been warm and it usually melts pretty quickly. This past winter had a lot of rain which gets rid of snow pretty well.

      However, as someone living in Syracuse with all my jobs since graduating college were in the Utica/Rome area; there isn't too many jobs in Software Development. There aren't many jobs in Utica/Rome, either, but if you want to find a job in Central NY (it's only called upstate by people from NYC. Messina is Upstate.) you need to look from Buffalo to Albany. If you can't relocate, you'll be looking for a while...

      --
      -SaNo
    4. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I'm tired of seeing people endlessly trash Upstate because of what they read about the winter.

      Son, any area that has six inches of snow on March 31, has some serious Winter issues.

      --
      That is all.
    5. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have lived in the same places as you (DC, Rochester, Seattle). Small world.

      As bad as DC was at snow preparedness, it was nowhere near as bad as Seattle. Last year we had a week of Rochester like snow. The reaction? "Compact it down -- it'll melt." At least in DC they have snow plows with metal blades and they're not afraid to put a little salt on the roads.

    6. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by asylumx · · Score: 1

      LMAO - Somebody please mod parent funny!

    7. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I have been to upstate New York in winter. It wasn't as bad as I thought but it was cold but I was born in South Florida. The pictures I have seen of it in summer look very pretty. I think the problem with Update New York is that it isn't New York City and that a lot of companies that used to be very big employers in the area have gotten a lot smaller.
      Kodak and Xerox come to mind.

      Hey I wouldn't mind going there in summer just to look around. Probably a great place for a motorcycle trip.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      there isn't too many jobs in Software Development. There aren't many jobs in Utica/Rome, either

      I would certainly agree with that. There aren't all that many jobs upstate, period.

      However, the article trashed the climate (rather inaccurately at that) before mentioning the job market (or absence thereof). And for that I would like to disembowel their editors.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    9. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by cez · · Score: 1
      Indeed... check out Saratoga Springs and Lake George in the summer...both are absolutely beautiful. Great places to live, work, and or visit! Saratoga is closer to Albany, but Lake George is only about an hour north. There's actually a new Chip Fab campus coming to the area 23 miles north of Albany outside of Saratoga in Malta, NY. From the linked (quickest google result I found):

      The operation will mark a milestone in the development of U.S.- based wafer- fabrication operations. AMD's Malta facility will be the first chip fab built on a U.S. greenfield site in more than a decade. And it'll be one very big greenfield -- a 650-acre (260-hectare) site in the Luther Forest Technology Park. With a footprint spanning 1.2 million sq. ft. (111,480 sq. m.), AMD's facility will be one of the world's largest fabs. As reported in the November 2005 issue of Site Selection , the site was made more attractive by the purchase of 1,186 acres (480 hectares) adjacent to the central 164 acres (66 hectares) that the Luther Forest Technology Campus Economic Development Corp., a subsidiary of Saratoga Economic Development Corp., already owned. The purchase was helped by a recent $4.8- million state grant

      --
      Walk with Music;
    10. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by CapsaicinBoy · · Score: 1

      I lived in Syracuse for 19 years and then Ithaca for another 5. Since moving away, I've also lived in California (Oakland Hills) and southern New England. And you are absolutely right - the snow simply isn't a big deal as the municipalities have the knowledge, equipment, budget, and planning to cope.

      I've seen CT and RI cities paralyzed by snow that CNYers would laugh at. But here is the critical distinction - it's not that folks are more hardy, it's that the towns deal with it in a timely and appropriate manner. Here in Rhode Island, they do a halfassed job plowing, and then cross their fingers and pray it will melt. Well, that's fine assuming it doesn't then melt and refreeze into sheets of ice, which it seems to do more times than not. In contrast, after a CNY storm, the road is dry and black 1 or 2 days later, even when your lawn still has 6-12 inches of accumulated snow.

      Besides, update is incredibly verdant the rest of the year. As I said, I've lived in Northern California, and the 'golden hills' are just a nice euphemism for brown.

    11. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "10 inches on the ground at a time; "

      and that's 10 inches too many.*

      The weather sucks, I base that on It snows, and everything you described.
      OTOH, that's just me. You seem to like it, so good for you.
      Maybe you should just realize that it's not everyone's cup of tea?
      Hint: we know when it says 115 inches it's not all at once.

      *That's what SHE said* Giggity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is.

      I 'experienced' UNY for five long years. I now live in Southern California.

    13. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by PhoenixFlare · · Score: 1

      And of course, the drivers in D.C. and Seattle don't know how to deal with snow/ice: at the first flake, ancient reptilian instincts cause them to drive straight into trees, jersey barriers, other cars, etc.

      Yep, annoying, but also keeps me (originally from Syracuse area, college at RIT) amused - if we ever got the multi-foot snowstorms here in DC/NoVA on a regular basis, it would be utter chaos. I still remember the day my wife and I moved here, 1.5 inches of snow and everything closed like 2 hours early.

    14. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Well I went to Rochester in February. Got to slip on ice for the first time in my life walking to dinner.
      The people where very nice but I was glad to finish up that job. They day I left it -4 with a -23 windchill.
      When I landed at Palm Beach it was 75.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    15. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      I'm tired of seeing people endlessly trash Upstate because of what they read about the winter. What the summary doesn't tell you about the 115 inches of snow is that you rarely have more than 10 inches on the ground at a time; the weather trends for this area lately have seen snow coming primarily on the leading edge of warm fronts in the winter. The result of this is of course you'll shovel your driveway on Monday and then put on sunglasses and a very light coat by Wednesday. In reality every winter in Upstate New York has been near-record warmth for the past several years, and after the short winter season (only about 3 months in reality) the rest of the year is temperate.

      Exactly what part of Syracuse do you live in? I regularly had more than 10 inches of snow in my yard and i rarely had the desire to wear a very light coat in the below freezing weather. Sure we do sometimes have a warm winter with snow that never sticks but this last one wasn't one of them.

    16. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I calll BULLSH*T!

      Lived there myself.

      It was a miserable godforsaken place.

      The winter is easily 5-6 months out of the year (starting end of October and ending end of April). Yes, I have seen the 3 feet of snow that falls in April.

      The snow is horrific, and the cost and inconvenience to heat your home as a result is unbearable.

      The economy is crap, ruled primarily by corrupt lawmakers and business people who think the best way to get ahead is to screw as many low income workers as they can (DestiNY USA I'm lookin at you!).

      The quality of the IT people who work there is about 3 levels below everywhere else in the country. They get by through BSing their way into jobs with little to no clue about how the real IT industry works. The only real IT jobs available in the area are for defense contractors, since Syracuse, which "makes while the world takes", apparently doesn't make anything worthwhile anymore. (Lookin at you Carrier air).

      Finally, if all that's not enough, the property taxes are oppressive.

      I suppose for people who have lived in that muck all their lives it's tolerable, but for the rest of us, as my Dad used to say, "A bad job anywhere is better than a good job in upstate NY."

    17. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 1

      However, the article trashed the climate (rather inaccurately at that) before mentioning the job market (or absence thereof). And for that I would like to disembowel their editors.

      We Buffalonians would like to applaud the editor rectifying the unjust, decades-long misconception that we have the worst snow in the NY State.

    18. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've lived in upstate NY (Schenectady) and after having lived in other parts of the country I have this to offer:

      * upstate NY weather sucks except for 2 weeks in the Fall. Otherwise it is way too cold or way too hot
      * jobs are scarce
      * restaurants are pretty good, for some reason there's a lack of franchises so there are a lot of mom and pop / local restaurants
      * taxes are high
      * everyone's been there for 70+ years
      * lot of people are on welfare

    19. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been there, so I'll continue to bash you hillbillies from "the sticks" (read: anything north of Yonkers) all I want. At least until I buy a vacation home up there or retire to Florida.

    20. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by speroni · · Score: 1

      I went to school up in Potsdam, just down the road from Messina.

      If you stick to your definition of upstate, then yes upstate is a horrible place to find IT work. And every winter there will be a month where it doesn't get above 0 F. (Not to be confused with 0 C mind you.)

      But hey, the skiing was good.

      --
      Eschew Obfuscation
    21. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I lived in Upstate all my life until about 8-9 years ago. I never had a real problem with the winters, you just dealt with it. Since you got snow, you were always prepared to deal with it, so it didn't slow you down. I moved to Virginia, and I feel sort of guilty when I work from home when there is a mere 3 inches of snow or even less on the ground.

      Of course, I do have to remind myself that here, snow happens, but they don't have the infrastructure to really deal with it, so 3 inches of snow ends up being more dangerous than a foot of snow in NY. Especially with the asshat drivers around here that either drive far too fast for conditions, or slow down to a crawl if they see any snow.

      I do have to admit, I like living farther south much more. I rarely have to shovel, and there's more sunlight, but its not like I was suicidal in NY.

      As for the IT jobs situation, I find myself considering how lucky I was to have gotten a job in IT there to begin with. And I am even luckier that I got out before things fell apart after the first bubble popped. Just a year or two later, my former employer went bankrupt and bounced most of its staff to the curb with no severance or anything.

      If you have to start your career there in IT and you have a job lined up, it's okay for entry level, but if you plan on living there forever, you might as well give up now, because you have begun the inevitable slow, but certain path to career suicide. Once it is time to get into mid-career jobs, you need to get the fuck out of there. There is little room to change employers, so you end up locked into the situation where you are waiting for the person above you to be promoted, retire, or move out of state.

      Cost of living is low, but so is pay, so you are always better off going somewhere where your absolute pay is better, as long as the percentages are about the same.

      Having said that, I still don't see how Syracuse is much different than various other small to mid-sized cities out there. I doubt there is anything uniquely terrible tech-wise in Syracuse as opposed to anywhere else. That's probably why they brought up the snow, but frankly, even though there is more precipitation, a winter there is much preferable to winters in places like Mid-West, where the temperatures get much, much colder. I've just always thought of Syracuse as an IT dead-end, but nothing worse than that.

    22. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by cez · · Score: 1

      Lol yeah... cold I can handle, it's the windchill that gets me! I'd take Palm Beach any day, though Albany isn't too bad... changing seasons and all.

      --
      Walk with Music;
    23. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Oh and remeber that florida thing?
      I only had blue jeans, wool socks, a sweater, and a jean jacket to wear. I did buy some wool gloves as well. For most of the time I was there it was only down in the teens. Chilly to be sure but that last day and the ride to the air port was an experience.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Hausenwulf · · Score: 1

      I spent a winter in Saratoga Springs and was constantly amazed that the roads were cleared of snow every morning by the time I left for work. The hard part was getting out of the driveway. ;)

    25. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Seattle runs out of salt (and only salts lightly) because, get this, they don't want to pollute the sound with salt water runoff. That and they left 2-3" of packed snow downtown for a week deliberately

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    26. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Seattle comment is so true. I've lived in suburbs of the city for about two decades and snowfall always seems to bring out the worst in people's driving. Oddly enough, rain does the same thing lately. It's kind of depressing when you think about it.

      In terms of IT work, the Seattle area is not bad. I see a lot of jobs, but the problem is the excess competition. If the economic situation was marginally better, I wouldn't be concerned at all.

    27. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... and after the short winter season (only about 3 months in reality)

      Only about 3 months of winter? HA! You, sir, are clearly not from Syracuse.

      Syracuse, NY = 5.5 months of winter + 2 weeks of mud/spring + 3 months humidity/summer + 3 months autumn

    28. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by fractalVisionz · · Score: 1

      We don't even use much salt, mainly just sand.

      2-3" of packed snow is nothing coming from Pittsburgh, and hey, I liked being able to sled to work, though uphill sucks.

    29. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by snoogans126 · · Score: 1

      Amen. I've lived in Syracuse all my life, and and the worst time I've ever had driving in snow has been in Ohio and Pennsylvania. I once drove to Columbus 3 days after a snowstorm, the highways were a sheet of washborard ice for a good 30 miles into town and after getting off the highway the world was slush over frozen Ice, and the storm was only like 10 inches. When I arrived at my destination, I jokingly asked "what are they waiting for it to melt?" and was kind of frightened by the answer of yes. The Syracuse airport is typically closed for about 24 hours total each winter and rarely for more than an hour at a time (the airport being home to the world's largest snowplow helps). During northeast storms, planes are routinely diverted to Syracuse when other airports close. And if you're flying out, you never have to be concerned with the local weather, it's always the airport at the other end of the trip that you need to worry about.

    30. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      And Nichols' plan worked so well this year. I noticed the road to his house was clear the whole time.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    31. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I lived in Syracuse for 6 years, then moved to the SF bay area (Sunnyvale CA). This list is full of shit.

      Syracuse is a nice little city, reasonable housing costs, nice people, not crowded, decent economy, nice bars, golf courses, beautiful rural country all around it. Probably not a lot of foreclosures there, no ratty neighborhoods that I recall. I moved for the engineering job market - I have a great job paying much more than I'd be making in Syracuse, and I can switch jobs without moving or commuting 100 miles if the current job goes south. But I wouldn't dump on Syracuse at all as a place to live. A regular single person can afford a real house there, with land around it even (if you're willing to drive an extra 15-20 minutes), instead of a condo. High population density is nice economically, not so good for quality of life. Oddly, Chinese food in Syracuse is a LOT better than in the bay area, at least at the cheap lunch places. Chicken with broccoli has strips of white meat, no gristle, for $5 or so (in 1995). Not quite the same variety of ethnic food, however (Thai, Afghan, Indian, Med, etc - again, in 1995).

      I do like the weather in the bay area a bit better though, biking and running in December, no humidity, and all that. We keep our snow in Tahoe where it's most useful.

      As for handling the snow, here in California, the drivers have accidents whenever it _rains_. Un-believable. Fortunately I live a block away from work and walk, because I hate car-commuting.

    32. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I go to SU the weather sucks. Eat my shorts

    33. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by saintlupus · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.

      I always tell people that the winters here in the B-lo aren't nearly as bad as perceived -- the problem is that we get one nasty, king-hell snowstorm every five years or so, and that's the _only_ time you see Buffalo on the news since we stopped losing Super Bowls.

      Hence, the common misperception.

      This is actually a pretty awesome city to live in -- nice and cheap, great food, outdoor festivals every weekend of the summer. I just went on a 20 mile bike ride yesterday, most of it along the riverfront, and it was spectacular.

      Buffalo -- Not Just For Angry Polish Steelworkers Any More!

    34. Re:Upstate New York Isn't That Bad... by wolfemi1 · · Score: 1

      Dude, I just escaped from Syracuse after 3 years there, and I can tell you that it first starts snowing in August or September, and isn't cleared until May. Short winter? Are you high? Of course, I hear that Syr gets more snow than other upstate locations, so maybe you have a different experience somewhere else, but Syracuse is a hellhole.

  30. I'll speak up for Cleveland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having worked for 4 different tech companies in Cleveland, I'll speak up for it. Cleveland does have a few things going for it if you're in the tech sector.

    There's good higher education to hire from (CWRU (of which I'm an alum) and CSU (from which I've had a couple of excellent co-workers)), good cultural institutions (Cleveland Orchestra, Cleveland Museum of Art, Playhouse Square, The Cleveland Playhouse), good restaurants, affordable housing, decent enough public transportation, and bearable traffic. There's also a national park within about 30 or 40 minutes of downtown (Cuyahoga Valley National Park).

    The tech sector is a little small, but it's fairly close-knit as a result of that. I don't think you need 6 degrees to get from anybody to anybody else. One or two is probably sufficient.

    While the professional sports teams are perennially frustrating, that's not what I look for in a city. At the end of the day, a city is what you make of it. Cleveland comes with a lot of big city perks without a lot of big city hassles.

  31. In this economy any IT job is a good job by Ex-Linux-Fanboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    In this economy, any IT job is a good job.

    Of everyone who was in my circle of friends working in the IT and computer industry in the mid-to-late 1990s, the only people who have jobs today are in middle management. Not one non-manager I knew back then and know today is working today in the tech industry.

    I became an ex-pat, teaching English, translating documents, and helping with the Windows machines in an accounting office in Mexico. I would like to return, but there are just no jobs stateside where I want to live right now.

    One friend saved enough money to semi-retire; he, right now, is living with his family to minimize expenses and off of savings. He's not really sure he even wants to return to the industry; the last job he had a couple of years ago left him really burnt out.

    Another friend lost his job at a video game company in the late 1990s. He never got hired in the tech industry again, and is currently living off of a military disability pension, paying his debts and planning on returning to college.

    These are my luckier friends. Two friends, who have families to raise, both very recently lost jobs in the tech industry and have no idea when they will get work again. One is living off of savings and is really scared when he will get a job again. Another didn't have as much savings, had to leave the apartment he was leasing, and is currently shacked up with a buddy who lets him sleep in the extra bedroom in exchange for computer help; his wife and kids are living with their family.

    I am sure either one of these guys would accept a job in Cleveland or Alabama or anywhere else where the company is willing to pay them enough to support their family.

    It's a really scary time to work in the tech industry. If you have a job, and it pays enough to support your family, thank the lucky stars you're still working. Not everyone is as lucky as you right now.

    1. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a really scary time to work in the tech industry. If you have a job, and it pays enough to support your family, thank the lucky stars you're still working. Not everyone is as lucky as you right now.

      I really hate the phrase "you're lucky to have a job".

      I have my job because I know what I'm doing, luck has nothing to do with it. If I lose my job, then I'll go beat out somebody for a new one because I've taken the time to learn what I need to learn and be damned good at it.

      I keep my job because I'm an asset to the company I work for, not because they like my face or I carry a rabbits foot around.

    2. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lucky stars? My ass. I thank the hard work, diligence, years of earning a rock solid reputation and maintaining social contacts.

      The stars can kiss my ass.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      IT is stressful because it is a complicated, immature, and rapidly-changing industry. There are plenty of high-paying jobs in IT, but I think people leave the industry because they get sick of it.

      The good news, however, is that these jobs pay so well that after a decade or two, a diligent saver can have enough investment cashflow to semi-retire, while consulting part-time to get that discretionary income. That's my dream, anyway, after working in IT for five years and investing 1/3rd of my income.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    4. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Of everyone who was in my circle of friends working in the IT and computer industry in the mid-to-late 1990s, the only people who have jobs today are in middle management.

      Not surprised. The 1990s drew in tons of unqualified unprofessional people into IT. Anyone who could install ICQ and reboot an Win98 machine got some kind of job by clueless hiring managers. These people didnt develop professionally, they didnt finish school, they couldnt write a basic admin script, didnt know any OS9 or OSX let alone any linux, and they didnt know much outside of the most basic level 1 support tasks.

      Ive met these people and they really dont belong in the industry. Im not saying your friends are these people but there might be some overlap here. The culling in the last few years has sent a lot of people who dont belong in IT back to school or in different industries where they belong. Its more competitive now and when I mention, say, ssh I dont get a clueless look from the guy Im talking to. Having to work with unqualified bullshitters isnt desirable at all.

    5. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your friends sound like a bunch of whining slackers. Hell, you sound like a whining slacker.

    6. Re:In this economy any IT job is a good job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep my job because I'm an asset to the company I work for

      Heh, that's what everyone thinks until they're let go.

  32. Seriously? by Evildonald · · Score: 1

    Worst. Article. Ever.

    Timothy, wake up and post something other than a Dice.com ad.

  33. iJacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, wait, I thought it was H-Commerce? It's iJacking now? Or is this an East Coast versus West Coast Marketing Gang thing?

  34. Come to Alaska! by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll throw "might get mauled by a moose" for free!

  35. Nearly anywhere in the Carolinas by Sandbags · · Score: 1

    With the exception of Columbia, Greenville, and if you like Banks, Charlotte. The rest of the 2 states have virtually no IT opportunities unless you like being a 24/7 on-call IT admin for small firms with no money, no technological understanding, and will be satified with $35K anually... Short of about 50 companies, if you've been rejected by them, or rejected them, you really have no chances...

    --
    There is no contest in life for which the unprepared have the advantage.
  36. Missing by waterlogged · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Washington D.C. The entire metropolitan area is one big mess. I have to plan my WEEKEND trips to the grocery store with severe traffic in mind. The area/weather/people are nice enough. However, with the addition of the commute times, I am basically holding down another part-time job just to get to work and back. I work 10-12 hour days just to avoid sitting in that mess for 3-4 hours a day.

    --
    I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
    1. Re:Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people are nice enough? Man oh man. I grew up there. I have to say, I've done my share of travel, and I have not met snobbier people in any other place. It is so much easier to understand how politicians and political pundits are so trapped in their reality-bubble when you see how the people act... I was so eager to get out of there.

      As for the weather... August is just a couple months away, will you be saying that then?

      But I have to say... After I did leave, I kind of started to miss the place. Snobbish people and August weather aside. It's a fairly unique place.

    2. Re:Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to count commuting though, spending 10-12 hours a day "working" due to the 8 hours of work + traffic/distance, that pretty well describes working ANYWHERE in southern california.

    3. Re:Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Arlington and work downtown. It generally takes me 20 minutes to get to work; 10 minutes walking and 10 minutes on the metro. I go shopping on my way home from work, it's about 1 1/2 minutes out of my way. I can get to all kinds of events and activities on any given night in 30 minutes. Just about the only time I use my car is on the weekends. I think that DC is great area to live in.

      I used to live in Centreville, and I drove about about 30 - 45 minutes to get to the metro so I could take the train another 30 minutes into town for work. That same drive is about 10 - 15 minutes without traffic. I know where you're coming from, but I also know there's a very simple solution. Move. Pay a couple hundred dollars more in rent or mortgage, and get your ass out of your car and get your life back. It's worth every penny.

    4. Re:Missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Washington D.C. The entire metropolitan area is one big mess

      No kidding, Between the Super Mutants and the Feral Ghouls in the metro, it's almost uninhabitable.

  37. Bentonville does suck by trutative · · Score: 1

    I did not really have much negative feeling for Wal-Mart until I worked in Bentonville for two to three weeks at the Wal-Mart IT HQ.
    Between the IT sweatshop like conditions inside the building and all pervasive Wal-Mart "culture" in the rest of the town, it made
    me never want to spend time in a Wal-Mart store let alone any more time in Bentonville. Imagine if you will when you go to buy
    anything at a grocery store the only choices you have are Wal-Mart grocery stores! If Wal-Mart does not carry what you want
    then you are just SOL.

    1. Re:Bentonville does suck by Lost+Engineer · · Score: 1

      Everybody must be really fat. Wal Mart produce sucks, and the one here is just chock full of heart attack on a plate.

  38. Best city for? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Unless you are door to door trying to sell software IT is pretty much behind closed doors, in fact, a good percent of it dont require to be physically at the work offices. Now, if you talk about living in those cities (as in the time you are out of work or going to it, no matter doing what) or trying to get a new job (based on numbers of offers in Dice.com) the list worth something... but is not what the title say.

  39. Obviosuly they missed Cleveland's publicity video by howardd21 · · Score: 1

    They must have missed this, extolling the virtues of Cleveland:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysmLA5TqbIY

    --
    no comment
  40. Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Just a thought, but maybe the overall market is adjusting to which jobs are really worth what again. I think there's a limit to how much an office typist is really worth once you realize you are in a global economy, And that's all IT is for the most part, just this century's office typist. The dotbomb years are in the past, and high wages now are just inertia as the market gets flooded with millions more keyboard commandos a year. Sure, there will be keyboard work, but is it really always going to be worth more than 10x what a skilled tradesman can get, doing practical infrastructure building and maintenance? If you ask me, a good framer or electrician or even a well seasoned assembly line tech or whatever is worth a lot more than an AJAX webpage builder where the money is going to come from "ad revenue" some magical way. The cat is out of the bag, the bulk of the internet using public is going to eventually just default to blocking ads, fullstop.

      There's real work, then busywork, my guess is the real work will take increasing importance as the economy rearranges itself during these rather unusual times. Ten guys sitting around an expensive office making a hundred grand apiece watching each other's powerpoint slides and deciding on when the next meeting is going to be, then going to sit around and play video games mostly while staring at server logs on the side is not sustainable forever, not at any high payrate anyway. It was when the skillset was new, and not many could do it and the VC money was flowing like rain during a typhoon..but today?

  41. This is Sarah Palin, isn't it? by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

    C'mon, you'r not foolin' anyone.

    --
    This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
  42. Popular myth by TFer_Atvar · · Score: 4, Informative

    That was true during the pipeline construction era, but it's far closer to 55-45 male/female now. Funny how a rush of 50,000 male construction workers will skew the demographics of a state with a population of fewer than 300,000 (in the '70s) people.

    1. Re:Popular myth by Ironica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was true during the pipeline construction era, but it's far closer to 55-45 male/female now.

      That's still pretty unfavorable. It means that if every woman hooks up with a guy, there's still 10% of the population that's single and male.

      --
      Don't you wish your girlfriend was a geek like me?
    2. Re:Popular myth by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Remember, you haven't lost your girlfriend, just your place in line.

    3. Re:Popular myth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was true during the pipeline construction era, but it's far closer to 55-45 male/female now. Funny how a rush of 50,000 male construction workers will skew the demographics of a state with a population of fewer than 300,000 (in the '70s) people.

      Popular Myth and then 55-45? Do you realize how huge of a skew that is.

  43. Not keeping track of things are we? by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    The I4 corridor is inconsistant. There are places where the pay is good, and places where it is bad. I work along
    that cooridor and have for the last 20 years. Maybe you aren't looking hard enough.

  44. Move there. Now! Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Take my governor with you.

  45. San Francisco? REALLY? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

    San Francisco claims the No. 1 spot for worst cities for identify theft, or "iJacking." For professional sports, the Bay Area has the longest current streak without a major sports championship

    Yes because someone in IT is likely to have a problem with identify theft and care about sports. Please give me a break.

  46. They missed a couple by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Informative

    My personal worst list:

    • Memphis, TN - The capitol of North Mississippi. Grimy, dirty, backward city with one of the highest crime rates in the country. Not even tourists want to go there anymore. Redbirds Stadium is a great place for a ball game but entertainment outside that sucks ass.
    • North Platte, NE - If there's a place that can make Memphis look attractive, it would be that hell hole of a city.

    I agree with Bentonville. Wal-Mart has to outsource development because it's such a crappy place to work and then you have to live in podunkville, AR, for the privilege of working in a crap shop. Their turn over is high and even the really good people I know who have worked there hated it.

    Even with the economy in the toilet there are too many good opportunities out there to be stuck in a dreary job.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:They missed a couple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add Des Moines, IA to that list.

      The two main industries are government and financial services (mainly insurance and banking). Big bureaucracy and low salaries--if the money guys don't decide to get replace you with a cheaper H1B. Add to that, there aren't many companies to go to, so the tech community is small--keep running into the same people all the time.

      For some reason, the place reminds me of Batman's Gotham City.

  47. Doesn't Matter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its going to get Bangalored anyway...

  48. Cleveland doesn't suck. by evil_aar0n · · Score: 1

    I don't live there anymore, but, after Seattle, it was my favorite residence. Obviously, these jokers are basing their analysis on unflattering pictures, rather than driving through these towns. Just about everywhere you look as you drive on I-90, or 480, through Cleveland from one side to another, they're building. I'm including the suburbs because - and it's one of the great things about the area - getting around takes just a few minutes. The insurance company Progressive is huge in the area. I like my job in NYC, now, but I'd go back to Cleveland if I found something comparable.

    --
    Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    1. Re:Cleveland doesn't suck. by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 2, Informative

      Were building. Residential and commercial vacancy and foreclosure rates are very high, among the highest in the nation, throughout the entire region.

      There are a few positives, if you can land a job: commuting is tolerable; culture is good for a city its size; cost of living is fairly low. Some of the suburbs (e.g., Lakewood, Cleveland Heights) are quite interesting and livable. Reasonably good healthcare. A handful of great colleges (CWRU, Baldwin Wallace, Oberlin). If you have very marketable skills and can mostly avoid the central city, a great quality of life is possible here.

      But the negatives absolutely abound, especially in and near the central city. No large IT shops left. Small and shrinking middle class (consisting mainly of tradespeople; very little gainful employment of knowledge workers). Random violent crime against ordinary people (not just gang violence, and not confined to the inner city). World-class corruption at city, county, and state levels. Pervasive air and water pollution. Among the country's worst schools, in a country not known for good schools to begin with. Little sunlight. High rates of depression, thyroid problems, and various cancers. Low life expectancy. Very low average household income and wealth by developed world standards. Severe racial segregation and very poor race relations in general. Crumbling infrastructure. Bridges that are literally falling into the river, but cannot be closed for lack of any alternative. Public transportation limited to city-to-city or suburb-to-city commutes, while of what few jobs remain very few are in the urban core (most are in suburbs unreachable by transit). Rapidly aging population, well over national average levels of obesity and chronic health problems, mostly caused by pollution and/or poverty. Competes every year to top lists of poverty; always makes top 10 lists for crime. Entire streets boarded up and essentially abandoned. Most inner city neighborhoods ruled by thugs and/or organized crime. I could go on but I think you get the point.

      I'm still lucky enough to have an IT job (for now at least) but if not for that job, plus most of my family being here, I'd have left long ago, probably for Eastern Europe where I also have family connections. Cleveland epitomizes just about everything that is wrong with this country. Both the causes (irresponsibility, entitlement mentality, government-worship, racial and economic prejudice, provincialism, anti-intellectualism) and the effects (poverty, disease, ignorance, near total lack of upward mobility, and the overwhelming feeling of hopelessness and resignation). It could be fixed, if enough people cared enough to act, but they don't, so the only real chance anyone has to better themselves and their families is to leave if they possibly can.

  49. Orlando by Knowbuddy · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've worked in IT in the Orlando/Central Florida area since 1996. It's not that bad. It's not some perfect Utopia, but nor is it one of the worst places to work.

    The Good

    • One of the cheapest costs of living, especially if you don't mind commuting from the burbs.
    • No state income tax.
    • Hundreds of miles of beaches within 90 minutes in almost every direction.
    • More theme parks than you can shake a stick at, most of which offer cheap annual passes to Florida residents. (True story: I used to live across the street from Universal, and would get up at 8am to go ride the roller coasters for an hour before work.)
    • Wide variety of cultures and food, so if you've got a craving for it, you can probably find it within a 10 minute drive.
    • Winters are beautiful and cool.
    • Rails-To-Trails has converted many miles of old railroad tracks into running/cycling trails. My favorite trail is a half-marathon long (13.1 miles) one way, with only 2 lighted intersection crossings.
    • The IT program at the local university (UCF) isn't bad, and is very tech-worker-friendly with its online options. Many of the local community colleges even offer certification programs (such as A+, CCNA, Oracle, and even RedHat) in both day and night school.
    • Shuttle launches are awesome and you can see them by walking outside. Yeah, they're going away in a few short years, but they're still awesome.

    The Bad

    • It's a commuter town. Get used to driving everywhere. The public transport (GoLynx.com) is laughably bad, especially for IT workers. (The buses don't run useful schedules near the tech areas such as Heathrow.)
    • The nightlife continues to decline, and many local lawmakers continue to nail down the coffin lid.
    • Yeah, we occasionally get hurricanes. Sometimes more than one per season. But they aren't nearly as bad as what you see on TV, and we don't panic like other places do. In most cases we shut down the town for 24-48 hours and then go right back to work.
    • The blue-hairs. Yes, they really do drive as bad as you've heard. Yes, they do get out and vote for things that will make you cry.

    The Ugly

    • The heat. Today it is 95F with a heat index of 109F. And it's not a dry heat. It is an oppressive, sticky, walk outside and break into an instant sweat kind of heat.

    The tourists aren't that bad, unless you are hanging out in the tourist areas. Which you aren't going to do after your first month here.

    In all, there's more good than bad.

    1. Re:Orlando by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 1

      I live and work near UCF, and it certainly doesn't deserve to be on this list. I believe most of the IT/engineering jobs are outside of Orlando proper, near UCF (Research Park, Siemens, Lockheed-Martin, etc)... basically near the NE corner of Orange County. Luckily, the touristy areas are to the SW of Orlando, which means your morning commute won't be interrupted by a lost family in a rental van driving very slowly while looking for Seaworld.

      The blue-hairs drive badly, but I think the bulk of accidents is due to the combination of them, the Puerto Ricans (not being racist- but driving laws in PR are rarely enforced, and then they move here), and the New Englanders who think that they can drive fast and careless not have to worry about the two aforementioned groups.

      It is f@#ing hot today. I drive a black car with black interior (I bought it before I moved to FL) and I dare not leave work to go to lunch today.

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    2. Re:Orlando by idiotnot · · Score: 1

      The IT program at the local university (UCF) isn't bad, and is very tech-worker-friendly with its online options. Many of the local community colleges even offer certification programs (such as A+, CCNA, Oracle, and even RedHat) in both day and night school.

      UCF (and the Orlando area) are also hotbeds of modeling and simulation work. Probably not of much interest to someone who wants to fix people's "broken Outlook" for life, but definitely some interesting work to be had.

      And the last time I was in Orlando, it was cold (upper 30s). Of course, it was in the teens where I live, but that's beside the point. :-)

    3. Re:Orlando by ChefInnocent · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention in "The Bad" column to bugs the size of sewer rats.

    4. Re:Orlando by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      As someone who used to work in Orlando, I'd like to second this defense of it. I've worked in 6 different cities now, and Orlando was far and away my favorite.

      The articles main complaint seemed to be that you have to share the city with aligators. Yeah, it can be kind of a bummer that you can't just heedlessly jump in any old lake you like. But on the other hand, gators are just way damn cool. If anything I had more trouble with the other local fanua (fire ants, feral pigs, etc). Honestly, you did a better job of talking it down than the article did.

      Hurricanes are really no big deal there. You are far enough inland that they are just really big storms by the time they get to you. We get ones nearly as bad in Oklahoma, and way more of them. The locals freak out way more over mild freezes. Its funny to see everyone's shrubbery suddenly sprout bedclothes when the forecast night lows hit the lower 30's.

      Cool things you didn't mention: Nighttime shuttle launches. Sadly, I don't think there will be any more of these, but anyone who has seen one knows what I am talking about. You just can't imagine the light those things put out unless you've been there. Think dawn in the middle of the night. Best free show on earth.

      Year round outdoor activities. I spent one Christmas with a mild sunburn because I'd been playing beach volleyball two days before. Along with this, there are bike lanes on every road.

    5. Re:Orlando by xjimhb · · Score: 1

      I am really surprised that an article on Slashdot managed to miss the ABSOLUTE WORST thing about Orlando - EVERYONE USES WINDOZE!!!! Look at ads for Orlando (OK, the whole Orlando metro area) on Dice or Monster, and you'll see tons of jobs for C#, .net, and similar Micro$haft junk. Very few openings for Linux/Unix jobs.

      I think this one thing should have put Orlando much closer to the top of the "Worst" list.

    6. Re:Orlando by lanner · · Score: 1

      I worked for EA Tiburon a couple of years back. Between working for EA and working in Florida, it was the WORST experience I ever had at work and home.

      The toll roads sucked. It cost me something like $25-$30 a week to drive the roads I needed to get to work. The difference was like 15 minutes for the toll roads vs an hour to take the streets. The only good thing about them was that nobody could afford to drive on them, so traffic was light.

      Fat government contractors? Yep. Blowing your tax money to get fat in Floriduh.

      The old people definitely sucked.

      Annoying students! Remember "Don't taze me bro!" boy? A classic Florida college doucheberry. Between their drunkenness, trashiness, and inflated self-importance, you were a miserable person if you lived anywhere near one of the many colleges.

      The bugs were annoying, though all of the green wildlife mostly offset it.

      Low pay. Consumables cost the same as everywhere else, though housing and taxes were lower. But, the whole of Florida was generally depressed as far as IT wages went.

      I had never before witnessed someone use a racial slur against another person in a hateful way until I moved to Floriduh. Suddenly, I was working with two white people in my office refer to another employee, who was black, as a "nigger". I was shocked.

      As the above commenter noted, the night life sucked, unless you went out to the theme parks.

      I hope everything you own is on a UPS, because Floriduh I believe is the number one state for lightning strikes.

      It's flat and has lots of trees. At first, you won't understand, but then realize that you can't see the horizon unless you go to the beach. All you can see is about two blocks away, and then it's trees. No hills -- ever. I think the highest point in the state is actually a land fill. After awhile, this really started to bother me. It made me feel trapped. I wanted to go to the airport and GTFO as soon as I could.

      Worst of all though, was the bad attitude everyone else had. If you weren't retired, military, a tourist, or a racist red-neck, then you were bitter and angry about living in Floriduh. I guess I understood why. I got the hell out as soon as I found another job out of state and could arrange the move.

    7. Re:Orlando by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My sister lives there. I don't want to slam anyone's town, but I really don't like Orlando. Got stuck more than a few times on the I-4, have had lots of snooty restaurant staff, noticed very racist undercurrents (I'm Asian and everyone from grocery clerks to hotel managers have given me this "know what I mean?" glance when talking about non-white patrons). Biggest turn off: it seems that everyone I meet there is really, really concerned about how much money they're making in the markets, etc.. I've been fortunate in financial matters, but consider it annoying when people try to determine how much I make, what is my source of income, etc.. (I own an IT consultancy, btw, and do a lot of work with the tourist businesses in that area).

    8. Re:Orlando by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      My CS degree is from UCF. UCF was great. But I tried to start my career in orlando and got nowhere. I found myself competing for low paying salaried jobs against people from colder states with masters degrees who were willing to pay the sunshine tax. Florida sucks. Let me count the ways. Florida is a state full of rich people and the poor people who serve them. Incomes are low. Housing costs were high. Bugs. Oppressive heat. Air conditioners in public places are frequently tired and insufficient. High humidity ensuring 90 degree evenings. Frequent food poisoning from inadequate refrigeration. Torrential rain. Skin cancer from an oppressive sun. Bugs. Hurricanes. Did I mention the bugs? First, there's love bugs. They're these annoying flies that swarm and fuck in mid air. When your car hits them, you have 8 hours to wash them off. If you don't they eat through the paint on your car. I had to stop my daily 2 mile jog because I kept inhaling bugs. Then there are several varieties of roach, the best being the Palmetto Bug. This is a giant flying roach. Nice. Then there's ants. At one point we had 5 varieties of ant in our house. They go after everything. Leave dirty dishes in your dishwasher waiting for a full load? Expect ants in your dishwasher. Ever put a half used box if cereal in your pantry? Expect ants floating in your cereal in the morning. Leave dirty dishes in your kitchen sink? Ants. Food crumbs between the keys in your keyboard? Ants. Only inside the fridge was safe because they didn't like the cold. I had ants in my car at one point. Then there's the fire ants. Giant spiders. Mosquitoes... People were building houses with conduit built into the walls that the exterminator could access outside your house. Sprays bug spray right into your walls.

      At least you don't have to shovel sunshine! Bite me. Florida sucks. Leaving was the best thing I ever did.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    9. Re:Orlando by Hausenwulf · · Score: 1

      One of the cheapest costs of living, especially if you don't mind commuting from the burbs.

      You're kidding, right? I've lived a few years in Tampa now, but moved from Oklahoma and I actually know what a low cost of living is really like. Let's just say the cost of living in central Florida is not incredibly high but nowhere near the cheapest.

    10. Re:Orlando by Knowbuddy · · Score: 1

      I tried to start my career in orlando and got nowhere. I found myself competing for low paying salaried jobs against people from colder states with masters degrees who were willing to pay the sunshine tax.

      This is a good point that I didn't think about until you brought it up. As Florida is so retiree-heavy, the low- to mid-level tech positions are high-competition and don't pay very well. (This is true of pretty much the entire state, though, not just Orlando.) Why hire a new graduate who thinks they should make $50k on their first day, when you can hire a Navy/Air Force retiree who is living off a pension and will take $40k?

      People without a degree run into the same problem. I was one of those people until I went back to UCF and finished my BS.

      However, the high-end tech positions do pay well, and aren't nearly as contested. I'm not talking about MS- or PhD-level stuff, more like BS plus 5-10 years experience. And you can't just look good on paper -- you need to have actual skills. You'll start at $65k-$75k and make it into 6-figures quickly. This may not sound like much when compared with Chicago/NYC/LA/SF rates, but remember the lack of state income tax and the cheaper cost of living. You can be self-sufficient on less than $40k here, and be quite comfortable before you hit $50k. At $65k you'd have to be profoundly fiscally irresponsible to have a bad time of life around here.

      Did I mention the bugs?

      I always forget about the bugs, to be honest. To me, they aren't a big deal. Love bugs are only a problem for a few weeks twice a year. Palmetto bugs (flying cockroaches as big as your thumb) and ants are only a problem if you don't maintain a pest control service like Terminex or Sears. Or, maybe you have cats and don't mind picking up the occasional present.

      Another thing visitors always say to me: lizards. I don't really notice them, but they really freak out some people. They are ubiquitous here. But we're talking about little anoles, not the big iguanas they have down in the Miami area.

      And the flat -- some people just can't deal with it. Pretty much all of Florida is startlingly flat, especially to people that grew up in New England or out west. All of my NYC/Chicago friends discover how agoraphobic they are when they come down here.

    11. Re:Orlando by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      the Puerto Ricans

      Trivia: there are more Puerto Ricans living in florida than have ever lived in Puerto Rico throughout history.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    12. Re:Orlando by squallbsr · · Score: 1

      Denver also concentrates heavily on .NET jobs. I think I need to move to Oregon, next door to Linus...

      --
      Sleep: A completely inadequate substitution for Caffeine.
    13. Re:Orlando by kallisti777 · · Score: 1

      Thank you from an Orlando native. You said it better than I would have anyway.

      --
      Vanya's Law: "In any culture without irony, fart jokes will be the highest form of humor."
  50. Dallas?? by jschmitz · · Score: 0

    Houston has WAY more of an thriving IT market than Dallas considering most every oil company there is has a headquarters here..Dallas has EDS..TI and a few others but there is no comparison

    1. Re:Dallas?? by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

      Dallas is also a little bigger with Intel. Admittedly, there are Intel plants in Houston too, but not as big or as many as in Dallas.

      --
      SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
    2. Re:Dallas?? by hal2814 · · Score: 1

      Dallas is the home of Ma Bell (or AT&T or whatever name she goes by these days). That's the frickin' phone company. The phone company is for all intents and purposes an IT shop. EDS? TI? I guess they employ people but the company who is practically in charge of our physical network domestically trumps a few oil companies when it comes to IT workers.

    3. Re:Dallas?? by hemp · · Score: 1

      AT&T has their corporate offices in Dallas, but less than 100 employees work there.

      EDS was bought out by HP last year and is in the process of being dismantled employee by employee.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    4. Re:Dallas?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EDS still has US employees? They must be salesmen as it seemed they outsourced everything else to India years ago.

  51. Walmart has among the most advance retail IT by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thats how they plowed into being the world's number one low-price retailer. They move a half trillion of product a year and know where most of it is any anytime to the single item. I not interested in business IT, but I have to admire their results. (Maybe they should have used some of that dough to hire style consultants like a Martha Stewart.)

    1. Re:Walmart has among the most advance retail IT by jjohnson · · Score: 1

      At my last job I worked quite a bit with Walmart IT guys in Bentonville. Most of them were quite smart and competent, and no one seemed unhappy to be where they were.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
  52. Just an awful list. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This list of cities has nothing to do with IT what so ever. The only thing connected to IT with any of the cities is the number of dice.com jobs available in the citiy which doesn't seem like a very decent way to judge the number of IT jobs in a city or even how "friendly" the city is to IT.

    And how does anything relating to national sports teams have anything to do with making a city worst for IT? He brings this up twice out of ten cities!

    What makes a city bad for IT? Low income, lack of jobs, no or minimal education systems seem more important then a freaking sports team member leaving to a different city dammit! How about more real details lie "xyz company moved over seas taking with it 30% of the jobs" or "annually only 2% of local jobs are related to IT".

    1. Re:Just an awful list. by Skapare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember that these articles are written by people who have only a passing interest in IT or technology. They like and buy gadgets. They never choose the OS their computer runs. They have no clue what geeks really like (for example quality import or locally brewed beer, instead of massive quantities of major brand junk).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Just an awful list. by geno123 · · Score: 1

      (for example quality import or locally brewed beer, instead of massive quantities of major brand junk).

      so true :)

  53. With a grain of salt... by EvilGrin5000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    After reading TFA which brings a tie between Boston and LA as awful places to work, the link right below this article entitled "Where the IT Jobs Are: 10 American Cities" lists BOTH Boston and LA.....

    Just for reference, the article from this thread is from June 18th or so while the second article praising cities for IT jobs is from May1st.

    Although the original article mentions both places as a heaven for IT geeks, it also warns against the quality of life in the areas....or maybe I'm just trying to find the silver lining?

    --
    A black cat crossing your path signifies that the animal is going somewhere. -- Groucho Marx
  54. Really? Boston? by RedHelix · · Score: 1

    W.... what? Boston may be "full of itself" in regards to sports, but I had landed a sysadmin job before I even graduated late last year, after only a month of job searching. Even my brother landed a sysadmin job a week after being laid off. If you're intelligent enough to compete with the many local tech school grads and like working in IT, Boston is where you want to go.

    And before you complain about real estate prices there, do bear in mind that you don't have to suffer through tornadoes, floods, earthquakes, and the last major hurricane we had was a gust of wind compared to what Floridians routinely deal with.

    1. Re:Really? Boston? by Punk+CPA · · Score: 1

      If you go just outside of the city, you can easily find a decent 2-br. apartment for $1200 - 1400/mo. That's a lot more expensive than Bentonville, but a lot cheaper than New York. A lot of the IT jobs are outside the city, so the hellish commute is not all that relevant if you can just stay off Rte. 128. IT jobs used to cluster around Cambridge and Rte. 128, but now you find plenty of them in the Chelmsford MA/ Nashua NH region, outside of Rte. 495. With some kind of industry experience besides IT (health care, financial services, education, security, etc.), you should have no trouble scoring a job.

      We have beaches, mountains, lakes, night life, whatever you like. The only thing we don't have is tickets to the Red Sox - they just had their 500th consecutive sold-out game. Maybe you can see them in New York when the play the Wankees.

  55. What's up with Boston. by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    They (CIO) show it as one of the cities with the most IT jobs and also as one of the worst.

    Sure, it is not a direct contradiction, but do they like it or hate it?

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:What's up with Boston. by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      Just because a city has a lot of IT jobs doesn't mean it's a good city to work in.

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  56. Don't Kick New Orleans (Yet) by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 1

    It's probably too early for most publications to bash on New Orleans again. Wait for a giant hurricane to take out a different city first.

    --
    I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
  57. Burlington, Vermont by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Burlington, Vermont is really horrible. Cost of living is ridiculously high and the tech industry pays you about half of what your worth.

    Food and Real Estate are soooo expensive.

    $100 worth of food will last you half way through the week, possibly through the week if you budget well and hit the sales. Mind you, this is for one person. (I am not overweight by any means, very in-shape and eat less than most).

  58. Usually a lack of professional development by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

    While I sympathize and hear these stories a lot, I find they are usually due to a lack of professional development. There are kids out of school or self taught that can do almost any entry level IT position in a given role whether that role is service tech, admin, engineer, researcher, or even crazy turtleneck sporting visionary. And kids out of school are DELIGHTED to make salaries middle aged folk raising kids couldn't live off of. On top of this, the days of the IT gold rush are long over, and frankly anyone who expected that too be a long term prospect was just misguided. IT is an industry where to even keep your job you have to have a certain level of professional development, but without significant development efforts you will probably eventually not be able to make the type of stable living you need eventually. This is just part of being in IT, just like teachers have to put up with bratty kids all day.

    1. Re:Usually a lack of professional development by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Question:

      How much of this professional development that is 'necessary' is of the TECHNICAL SKILLS variety versus the PEOPLE SKILLS development?

      It would be nice if you ran down a basic list of what you think people need to work on since this was your main talking point. Thanks!

  59. They forgot ... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Redmond, WA.

    Yeah, mark this as flamebait. But sometimes its not about how many jobs are available, its about the quality of the work. I don't see anything attractive about a career that involves having to clean up after the 800 pound gorilla.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  60. NO!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop complaining and buy yourself a hammer

    That would require taking personal responsibility for your life instead of blaming all your problems on OMG Teh Illegal Immigrants!

  61. Portland doesn't get on either list because... by zullnero · · Score: 1

    It's a great place to work without a whole lot of jobs (the ones we have, though, are pretty skewed to IT). I like how that just falls through the cracks for both of those lists.

    I've gotten plenty of big time offers though from companies in those states on the top ten "good places", and I've turned them down every time to stay here. The air and water's cleaner, there's more parks and recreation than most places I've been, the extensive mass transit system saves me a bundle in auto costs, the property costs are way lower, and I've just kept getting jobs here that pay better than the average rate. Nowhere else really has ever come close, at least not for me.

    As for those spots on the worst list, with the exception of Boston and SF, I've replied to recruiters while laughing out loud at my effort to remain serious and not snide. When I say "If I know anyone who might be interested, I'll definitely send them on to you", in the back of my head, I'm thinking about any co-worker who's ever really pissed me off over the years.

  62. Job numbers on Dice are misleading by Skapare · · Score: 1

    For every real job, there's often half a dozen or more recruiters vying to place a candidate, and putting their own, somewhat re-worded, posting in Dice, Monster, and other places. So the numbers can be very inflated. OTOH, maybe this will make employers panic and decide they need to start hiring now to get the good people before they are all re-employed (they know the good people will get jobs sooner ... it's kind of like seeing prices moving back up and everyone hurries to buy while they are still kind of low).

    One issue to remember with recruiters is this. They often don't tell you who their client (the employer) is. And most employers have policies brought forth from the legal department to never hire a candidate when two or more recruiters submit the same one. You could be shut out of a job and you (and even the recruiters) never know why, because of how the recruiters behave.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    1. Re:Job numbers on Dice are misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The posts for each available position ratio on Dice recently have ranged anywhere from 4:1 to 23:1 in the smaller city I'm located in.

      What's really sad is that I actually took the time to compute those ratios.

    2. Re:Job numbers on Dice are misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, really. Hiring for IT jobs using IT by posting them online SHOULD have been the best marriage evah!!!!!

      How and WHY did it get this bad?

  63. Gotta stick up for my hometown... by bostongraf · · Score: 1

    (First, I must acknowledge the authors of TFA started it off by saying it was "snarky and unscientific". Noting that...)

    How could Boston make this list? It is a serious hotspot for technology. There are numerous smaller tech specific schools, as well as the MIT factor (assuming that four hundred yards across the Charles is still considered "Boston" from the article's point of view). There are numerous financial companies that are always hiring for IT, or at least hiring from other Boston based consulting firms. Then there's Big Pharma. If you consider Boston to be "within the 495 belt", you have a huge number of opportunities. If you consider Boston to JUST be Boston proper, then the traffic is a non-issue, as you should be taking public transport anyway.

    The traffic...I'm not going to say it is great, but it doesn't make the Forbes 12 Worst. However, it does make number eight on Jalopnic's list in 2008. That being said, there are alternatives to driving your car to most city locations.

    Regarding the sports championships that were brought up...that's just stupid. As somebody already said, they list SF because of the LACK of championships, but list Boston because there are too many. Silly. If you are into sports, you will find a very educated (although biased) fan base for every major sport (excluding NASCAR). I could go on regarding the sports situation, but I'm pretty sure anyone that cares about sports is already aware of the mark Boston has made on the sports world in the past decade.

    History. Someone complained that the town felt "old". Really? The city with the first university on this continent, the first battles of the Revolutionary war, the longest continuously run restaurants in the country, the first public park in the country, some of the oldest churches in the country, the oldest surviving naval vessel in the country, the first post office, the oldest professional sports venue(Fenway) in the country, and the first underground rail system in the country? That city came across as old? We prefer to view it as historic.

    Considering Boston is one of the cities in this country with the longest and most influencial histories and is also a long standing technology innovator, I would think there would be some understanding as to why there might be a level of pride.

    To bring home the point, you will notice that the author of TFA gave the number of job postings available for every other city on the list, except Boston and SF. That is because Boston (I don't know about SF) is still a power house in the tech world. The author complained about traffic and his home town teams losing too many sporting events to Boston's teams. Which is about as snarky and unscientific as you can get...

  64. Big market bias by buckeyeguy · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Top 10 list of "where the IT jobs are at": all big ad market cities. You can't pay me enough to move to Chicago, EVER, much less for a job, but it's on the CIO darling list.

    Bottom 7 list: small/mid-market and rust belt cities. Way to dig deep, CIO.

    Sure, Cleveland has it down side, but compared to the 'top 10 cities for IT jobs' that they also have a slideshow for, the place is WAY cheaper to live in, and if you're smart you're not living in the city anyway, when a nice clean house in the nice clean burbs is dirt cheap. Plus if you get overworked and have a heart attack, head over to the Cleveland Clinic; they'll patch you up real good.

    So people from SoCal, how's LA to work IT in, what with the crappy traffic and screwy government?

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    1. Re:Big market bias by BountyX · · Score: 1

      Cleveland was ranked #5 best cities for recent college graduates by CNN. If you're a talented IT professional Cleveland is the place to be. You can buy a nice 4 story home in the burbs for 80k-100k, enjoy the beach, and make 65k at a regular IT job here. There is a 16k difference in disposable income between Cleveland and chicago, I highly doubt you can live the same lifestyle in Chicago and still maintain a large amount of disposable income.

      --
      Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    2. Re:Big market bias by neckjonez · · Score: 1

      The key in SoCal is to minimize the commute. I have known people (including myself) who will move across town if taking another job, only to avoid traffic. Conversely, I will not take a job if I know the commute will kill me. At the end of the day you just have to consider how much your time is worth, not to mention your sanity. $10k, $20k year? I don't think so. Having lived here for 10+ years, I know the do's and dont's of commuting in LA. DO: minimize the commute learn the surface streets pay attention when driving (you know who you are. then again maybe you don't) support your local music scene DONT: take the 405, anytime take the 10 west in the AM get mad if the freeway is jammed at midnight, it just happens live on the east side and commute to the west side live in Orange County and work in LA live in LA and work in Orange County It's not for everyone, but I love it here.

    3. Re:Big market bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people from SoCal, how's LA to work IT in, what with the crappy traffic and screwy government?

      Horrible. I still work with a lot of people from LA, and they are routinely absent from the conference call / in the car. It's just accepted. Of course if you work downtown you are not going to want to live anywhere near there, so have fun commuting. Now the places that are nice and easy to commute from command insane real estate prices. Even at half off their boom highs these places are not affordable for your average IT worker. Maybe if you have a wife/husband and he/she works in IT too. So again have fun commuting, now from Riverside where you can afford to live.

      After all the income taxes, roughly a third of your paycheck is gone, give or take based on programmer's salaries, which are pretty good, although not quite as good as the Bay. Sales tax, car tax, electric tax... no one knows how many taxes. For this you earn the exact same public services as the rest of the country (save for the public colleges and Universities which are much better than average -- of course you'll need that resident bump to get in because you'll be dumber than dirt having attended the public schools, and it's not actually that cheap once you do). New homeowners, unlike aging hippies, will also have to fight high property taxes. Whatever you heard about low property taxes only applies to middle aged people and above. Should you need to rent, it is also expensive compared to middle America, but again not as high as the Bay.

      Bottom line is SoCal is great for 4 kinds of people: those who really, really like the outdoors (surfers, bikers, etc.), old people, wealthy people, and recent immigrants. The first and the fourth describe a fair bit of IT people, and that's who you'll see.

    4. Re:Big market bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anon Coward here. LA like everywhere else has +/-

      Good:
      High base salary
      Stable IT job environment
      Lots of media related work(E.G. web crafting, DRM development, etc)
      Every culture in the world is here.
      Lots of beaches, learn to surf.

      Bad:
      Traffic
      High cost of living
      Unreasonable commutes, due to decent housing not being located near job centers
      unreliable mass transit
      Forget seeing nature, the beaches and parks have are packed during the day
      High tax burden (E.G. City, County, State, Fed, Sales, Vehicle, you name it tax)

    5. Re:Big market bias by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      Same thing in DC. I have no idea how people can commute from say, Prince William county to DC every day. I tried that once for 6 months, then got a new house inside the beltway. Little bit more expensive for slightly less house, but not as much as you would think. You can find surprisingly good deals close in in good neighborhoods. You just have to look and to make a few compromises .

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    6. Re:Big market bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So people from SoCal, how's LA to work IT in, what with the crappy traffic and screwy government?

      I love working in LA.
      I'm biased though, having been born and raised here (yes a native!)
      There are great IT opportunities in all types of areas, big firms: ea, symantec, google, lots of entertainment, and professional consulting like doctors and lawyers offices.
      Also, there are lots of tech startups. I'm at one now!

  65. Mod Parent Up. by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

    Ironically, I'm at a coffee shop with free Internet access and the executive bean counter who cut my job is three tables away having lunch.

    If you have a job right now, count your lucky stars. I was the best in my group of contractors and my boss was shocked and dismayed when word came down to lay me off, too. There was a lot of talk of bringing me on full time. Then the hiring freeze hit - three months later I'm out of a job.

    I just had to move out of my apartment. No Internet access (except at a cafe). Unemployment is currently the only thing keeping me afloat. My saving are draining fast. Fortunately my parent's home is empty and I can move into it while they're in Florida. But I can't stay there too long.

    One recruiter I recently spoke to told me, "We don't get applicants from Oklahoma. That's very unusual." Yeah, my current location is working against me, too. Fantastic.

    Here's the skinny:
    1) Companies are pretty much only looking for local candidates.
    2) Companies are not paying for travel expenses for non-local candidates. Would you spend $500 on the conjecture you might be hired for the position that five or six people are actually being interviewed for?
    3) I'm being forced to write local addresses for those areas where I do want a position. Fortunately I have family spread out all over the US and can use their addresses.
    4) If you're even slightly skittish that you may lose your job, START LOOKING NOW!

    You're working? Shut your mouth, Keep your head down low, become more valuable but don't take risks. Even then....you're not guaranteed you'll be working next month.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Up. by ragethehotey · · Score: 1

      I was the best in my group of contractors and my boss was shocked and dismayed when word came down to lay me off, too.

      A lot of delusional people think that they are the best at what they do too, and are absolutely shocked when they get laid off. (As well as their sympathetic boss!)

  66. NWA by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

    Living there, I can say Northwest Arkansas is not that bad. And there's a difference between a funnel cloud and a tornado, but getting back on topic, besides Walmart there's a few other large companies based here that hire a decent number of IT people such as Tyson and JB Hunt.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
  67. hmm by NovaHorizon · · Score: 1

    what about the cities that list tech jobs as: 0 ?

  68. Boston: worst and best at same time? by Kostya · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They sarcastically slam Boston, but then list it as one of the 10 cities where "all the IT jobs are". So make up your mind already.

    And as someone living in Boston, screw you and your list :-)

    --
    "Doubt your doubts and believe your beliefs." -- Switchfoot, Ode to Chin
  69. Sports by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    They seem to be hung up on sports. WTF? Are there really a lot of IT folks who give a damn about that nonsense? To the point that it affects where they'd want to live?!

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  70. U.s is fine -- what about Canada by KingPin27 · · Score: 1

    There are some pretty bad places - it appears to work in the U.S. But what about Canada? I'm sure there's some Canadians out there - How about anywhere in Southern Alberta (south of Calgary)?

    --
    "i lost my dignity on a slippery wiener"
  71. Oh, please. by copponex · · Score: 0, Troll

    The guy said:

    not much of an immigration problem up there either

    That's a more socially acceptable form of actual bigotry and racism. I just gave him a little taste of his own ignorance.

    1. Re:Oh, please. by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      According to merriam-webster: the state or fact of being ignorant : lack of knowledge, education, or awareness

      Acknowledging that there is problems in the US with illegal immigration and the legal immigration programs is awareness not ignorance. The largest group of illegal immigrants are from Mexico and the root cause is the social-economic envrionment in Mexico which the US has no right to interfere with. Another leading cause is the Reagan amnesty in 1986. There is nothing bigoted or racist to require people follow the laws in order to immigrant to the US. I have yet to see any proposed modern immigration have anything to do with race or religion and I could not support such proposals. If in your world view it is racist to make a factual statement that most illegal immigrants are Mexican then you have a problem. I have found that 9 times out of 10 when someone pulls the race card in trying to defend illegal immigration it is because they have nothing but the emotional arguments left.

      I'm sure Alaska has illegal immigrants from Canada and even from Russia, but they should be treated just like any other illegal and sent back to their country.

      I have written my State and Federal elected representatives with my views that illegal immigration is a problem and that we need immigration reform without another ammnesty. While in many areas I disagreed with Tom Tancredo on the immigration issue I fully supported him while he was a Representative from Colorado.

       

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    2. Re:Oh, please. by copponex · · Score: 0, Troll

      According to merriam-webster:

      How did I stumble into a debate at a local junior high?

      But let's look at your argument, feeble as it may be.

      The largest group of illegal immigrants are from Mexico and the root cause is the social-economic envrionment in Mexico which the US has no right to interfere with.

      Corruption within the Mexican government is the biggest problem. The rules instituted by NAFTA and the exploitation of trade rules for the benefit and profit of US corporations have exacerbated this problem, which was preceded and founded by US meddling in Mexican affairs since the time of Andrew Jackson. You probably don't know it, but we did invade and conquer about half of Mexico in the middle of the 19th century.

      Recently Mexico was going to legalize marijuana, cocaine, hash, and perhaps even opiates and LSD in order to head off the failing drug war. However, the United States basically told them we would cut all aid if they did that. So they are stuck with our drug war, our failed policies, which in another amazing coincidence, also provides excellent profits for our private prison system, security consultants, and other contracted companies who are being paid to develop technologies to monitor the southern border.

      Another interesting fact is that a vast majority of the arms used to kill people in Mexico are purchased in the United States, illegally, because our gun registration system is practically meaningless. I know as you do that having the right to buy assault weapons is more important than life itself, and you can be sure the residents of northern Mexico understand that as well these days.

      Another leading cause is the Reagan amnesty in 1986.

      Reagan cared only about business. Businesses love illegal immigrants because they help push down wages for other workers. This is why you will never see illegal immigration reform, unless the drug war spirals totally out of control.

      There is nothing bigoted or racist to require people follow the laws in order to immigrant to the US. I have yet to see any proposed modern immigration have anything to do with race or religion and I could not support such proposals. If in your world view it is racist to make a factual statement that most illegal immigrants are Mexican then you have a problem.

      You know as well as I do that minutemen are not lining up on the southern border to look for white people coming back without a passport, and there is zero discussion of securing the Canadian border, or spending money in a far more important area, which is the inspection of incoming shipments to the United States.

      If your problem is that they don't contribute taxes to American society, the solution is to provide amnesty, give them a social security number and a long term work visa, and go on about your business. I'm afraid, despite all of your rhetoric, that your dislike of them has more to do with their heritage than their drain on the economic system. And unfortunately, you have no chance of success, since businesses will never allow illegal immigration to be shut down.

    3. Re:Oh, please. by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      How did I stumble into a debate at a local junior high? But let's look at your argument, feeble as it may be.

      At this point I don't think you are even ready for a Jr. High level debate. You have consistently provided flippant replies and immediately dismiss any opposing viewpoints as ignorant and now feeble. At this point my reply isn't for you, it is for people who are more open-minded that might read the words you spew.

      Corruption is due to the social-economic situation in Mexico. Sending public projects to family is normal, bribery as a way of doing business is normal. I see the corruption as one symptom of the poor social-economic situation so we really do agree here. I'm opposed to the US meddling in other countries and the US should not have done anything beyond saying they weren't happy with the proposed legalization.

      Another interesting fact is that a vast majority of the arms used to kill people in Mexico are purchased in the United States, illegally, because our gun registration system is practically meaningless. I know as you do that having the right to buy assault weapons is more important than life itself, and you can be sure the residents of northern Mexico understand that as well these days.

      Your so called fact has been disproven repeatedly. You will notice that the media hasn't brought it up recently. Only a small portion of firearms recovered in Mexico are sent to the BATF. This is because it is obvious that most of the firearms are not from the US. Machine guns are heavily regulated in the US and I've yet to hear of a single machine gun being traced back to the US. Yet machine guns are commonly used by criminals in Mexico. RPG's have been recovered and guess what, as a US citizen you can't go buy one.

      The Libertarian Party has even called Obama and news organizations out on this blatant lie. At http://blogofbile.com/2009/04/20/libertarian-party-calls-out-barack-obama-over-false-gun-facts/#more-4072 one quote is "That means only 5,114 out of 29,000 guns used in Mexican crimes were found to have come from the United States. That figure would be 17 percent, not the 90 percent repeated by Obama." While I would like to see no firearms transferred illegally to Mexico to say that the US is the major source is so far from reality as to be laughable. Here is another source where even the ATF has clarified on the 90% number that was so sensationally splashed across the news networks. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/elections/2009/04/02/myth-percent-guns-mexico-fraction-number-claimed/ .

      I do believe that the 2nd Amendment is very important and several States have put unreasonable restrictions on it. I'm very much opposed to the 1986 Firearms Act, there is absolutely no reason to not allow new machines guns to be owned by civilians. Of course I'm sure you use the made up definition of an assault weapon and consider any of the AR15's in my gun safe one. An assault weapon must be capable of burst or automatic operation. I'm all for reasonable restrictions which include background checks and for machine guns the stricter ATF background check and tax stamp are a good thing.

      You seem to view firearms as evil incarnate. I view them as tools, hobbies such as sporting clays, competition shooting or even just plinking are very relaxing. The people of northern Mexico are likely far more practical and don't curse the guns used by criminals, they curse the criminals. As proven in Darfur guns aren't needed to perform massacres, machetes do the job just fine. You should be attacking the root cause, banning guns won't solve the problem just change it. Why do people break the laws and do violent acts, if you can solve that then owning a gun won't matter one way or the

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    4. Re:Oh, please. by copponex · · Score: 1

      At this point I don't think you are even ready for a Jr. High level debate. You have consistently provided flippant replies and immediately dismiss any opposing viewpoints as ignorant and now feeble. At this point my reply isn't for you, it is for people who are more open-minded that might read the words you spew.

      Aww. I dismiss your viewpoint because it's untenable, due to your ignorance. You shouldn't take it personally.

      Your so called fact has been disproven repeatedly.

      Au contraire, my petite friend. Reading Fox and Libertarian news for gun control and expecting an unbiased report is like reading Interfax and expecting it to have a balanced view of Putin.

      Obama and the ATF arrive at their numbers by the following fact: of all the guns submitted to the ATF for tracing, between 90 and 95% of them are traced to the United States. These, of course, are not all of the guns collected by Mexico. Fox wants you to assume that the guns not submitted for tracing were "obviously" not from America, but that's simply malicious lying or simple stupidity. From FactCheck, who disputes both numbers: ...The Fox reporters come up with a figure of 5,114 guns traced to U.S. sources in fiscal 2007 and 2008. That figures to 17.6 percent of the 29,000 figure for guns seized in Mexico, as given by the country's attorney general.

      The 5,114 figure is simply wrong. What Newell said quite clearly is that the number of guns submitted to ATF in those two years was 11,055: "3,312 in FY 2007 [and] 7,743 in FY 2008." Newell also testified, as other ATF officials have done, that 90 percent of the guns traced were determined to have come from the U.S. So based on Newell's testimony, the Fox reporters should have used a figure of 9,950 guns from U.S. sources. That figures out to just over 34 percent of guns recovered, assuming that the 29,000 figure supplied by Mexico's attorney general is correct.

      Even that number is too low. At our request, an ATF spokesman gave us more detailed figures for how many guns had been submitted and traced during those two years. Of the guns seized in Mexico and given to ATF for tracing, the agency actually found 95 percent came from U.S. sources in fiscal 2007 and 93 percent in fiscal 2008. That comes to a total of 10,347 guns from U.S. sources for those two years, or 36 percent of what Mexican authorities say they recovered.

      The mistake the Fox News reporters made was to focus on some numbers given by Newell and Hoover in separate testimony, regarding numbers of guns traced to specific states. But not all guns traced to the U.S. can be traced to specific states. The Fox numbers are "a subset" of the actual total traced to U.S. sources, one official said.

      Further, from the BBC concerning the GAO report released a few days ago:

      The GAO acknowledges that there is insufficient data for a comprehensive study but concludes that the US, in particular the border states of Texas, California and Arizona, are the source of most of the weapons smuggled into Mexico. "While it is impossible to know how many firearms are illegally trafficked into Mexico in a given year, over 20,000 or around 87% of firearms seized by the Mexican authorities and traced over the past five years originated in the United States," GAO investigator Jess Ford says.

      there is absolutely no reason to not allow new machines guns to be owned by civilians.

      The next time you see a police officer, ask him what he thinks about your idea.

      Of course I'm sure you use the made up definition of an assault weapon and consider any of the AR15's in my gun safe one. An assault weapon must be capable of burst or automatic operation.

      You're confusing assault weapon and assault rifle.

      You seem to view firearms as evil incarnate. I view them as tools, hobbies such as sporting clays, competition

    5. Re:Oh, please. by ageoffri · · Score: 1

      Aww. I dismiss your viewpoint because it's untenable, due to your ignorance. You shouldn't take it personally.

      So you admit you are a close-minded bigot. Excellent, this explains why you automatically dismiss any facts that don't agree with your world view. Really at this time there is no point in continuing. You think I'm a racist, bible toting, gun slinging redneck and I know I'm not. I hope one day you see the light and can start to understand that just because someone thinks differently then you doesn't mean you are superior.

      It is interesting how many different ways that the gun statistic have been spun by all sides of the argument and at this point unless the raw data is released we really have no way to know. I think it has been over-exaggerated and use several sources to show why. I also find it very telling that the networks have dropped coverage of the issue which leads me to think they can't support the position and instead doing a retraction have just ignored it.

      While I find political arguments entertaining, once it reaches the point of "I'm right and you are wrong." why bother.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    6. Re:Oh, please. by copponex · · Score: 1

      I didn't dismiss any facts. I pointed out that you didn't have any. I consider that ignorance.

      All of the raw data available has been released. The GAO just clarified it. You are wrong, unless you want to believe that the sample of guns given to the ATF is an obscenely misrepresented sample. And if you believe that, what evidence do you have of it?

      The American networks don't cover democratic movements in Saudi Arabia. Does that mean they are unimportant? They don't cover undercover operations within Iran by the CIA, and all of their timelines for the history of Iran conveniently begin in 1979. They are reporting on celebrity news and how to make a summer salad. What does this have to do with the fact, as far as anyone can tell, that guns smuggled into Mexico from America are a huge problem contributing to the drug war?

      Racism is subtle and pernicious. My father is a racist. I am a conditioned racist, though I make a concerted effort to keep things in perspective. I suspect you are the same, because in a conversation concerning to places you'd like to live, "not having an immigration problem" apparently scores very high for you.

      And I'm sorry to say that ignorance, fear, superstition, and violence often go hand in hand. Look at any theocratic government and the resulting society.

  72. Cleveland has its advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pictures of urban Cleveland are depressing, primarily because nobody works there. Unemployment is high, and it's not Silicon Valley by any means.

    HOWEVER, there is not much skilled competition for the few reasonable (non-helpdesk) IT jobs that exist. Despite the unemployment, quite a few people are relocated INTO Cleveland from other parts of the country. Housing cost is dirt cheap, and the suburbs have plenty of new construction. Certain areas of Cleveland are virtual ghost towns, with rampant foreclosures and distressed real estate. But in the nicer suburbs, "for sale" signs are few and far between. Luxury cars and SUVs are everywhere.

    Infrastructure is built for 2x the population that Cleveland actually has. Morning commute is the speed limit.

    When companies migrate away from high cost areas, Cleveland should do pretty well. But it's going to be a rough ride for quite a while.

    1. Re:Cleveland has its advantages by buckeyeguy · · Score: 1
      commute: yeah no kidding, isn't 71 or 490 built with something like 5 lanes on each side now in the metro area? Makes it easy to get away from Downtown after a Tribe game.

      These 'quality-of-life' articles come and go like event calendars in the local paper's entertainment section. Nothing to fill column inches? Let's crap on markets where we won't lose anybody. Meanwhile, run a complementary piece about 'where the jobs are', and cover all the target markets. Philadelphia? A sh*thole, but we need that sh*thole, so put it in our top 10 places to be. Avg $51k for an IT specialist in Philly? Hah, the average is better here in Columbus, and possibly Cleveland too, since they didn't see fit to cite the average salary in the 'worst' article. No point in going on. The whole thing's just a troll.

      --
      I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
    2. Re:Cleveland has its advantages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it takes me about 30 minutes to get home from a Tribe game, and I live about 15 miles away.

      Articles like this are designed to promote high-cost cities. They do a wonderful job of explaining why you should do what everyone else is doing, starting with moving to where everyone else is moving -- because everyone else is doing it. Just like all the investment advise we get from the Monday morning quarterbacks of the financial media.

  73. how your 0 and 16 foot ball team doing planing for by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    how your 0 and 16 foot ball team doing planing for a repeat?

  74. Syracuse isn't bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I've lived all over Central New York, from Herkimer to Morrisville and now Pulaski. Syracuse is near the middle of this big triangle. I've seen it 40 degrees below zero (-75F with windchill) and I've seen more than 4 feet of snow dumped overnight. I've seen the high temperature for the entire month of February at -20F. But these extremes only happen once every few decades. In general, the temperature hovers in the 20's and you get light snow once or twice a week. Snowfall of more than 6 inches rarely happens more than once or twice a month and the ground rarely has more than a foot or two of snow on it for a week or more.

    However, as a recent IT graduate trying to find a job in Syracuse or the surrounding area, I can tell you that there aren't many. Most of the openings are for senior or manager level. A lot of businesses also seek employees with experience with proprietary systems. Personally, I love living in this climate and I dread the summer (75 degrees is too hot for me). Upstate is a great place to live if you can get a decent job. $50,000 a year can go a long way when cheeseburgers are a buck and you can buy corn on the side of the road for 10 cents and ear. The only reason I'm looking to get out of here is because the government (which is almost entirely controlled by NYC) is crushing anything and everything they can. Hunting is great... but so regulated that deer run rampant and cause loads of automobile and property damage. Fishing is great... except that now you need to pay exorbitant amounts for fishing licenses. Snowmobiling is amazing... except now they have roadblocks, check points and speed limits. The Adirondack Park is a great place to visit at almost 10,000 square miles (compare to 3,472 sq. miles for Yellowstone or 1,189 sq. miles for Yosemite).

    In short, Syracuse is a great place if you have the skills and don't mind big, overbearing government.

  75. North Platte, NE is a railroad town and the UP pay by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    North Platte, NE is a railroad town and the UP pays good.

  76. Re:how your 0 and 16 foot ball team doing planing by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    All they need to do is start out 0-10 for a new record! =D

    I'm actually not all that into football (guess why), but I'm a huge hockey fan. I was disappointed that the Wings lost the Cup to the Penguins this season. It was a good season though, so I can't really complain.

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  77. Re:how your 0 and 16 foot ball team doing planing by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    All they needed to do... apparently they already broke the streak. Shows how much I watch them play. And how much I pay attention to the dates on news articles I search for on Google. :)

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  78. Re:how your 0 and 16 foot ball team doing planing by Jake+Griffin · · Score: 1

    Okay, yea, I'm totally uninformed with football. The season doesn't start til Sept so they didn't end the streak yet. I'm going to stop posting about sports I don't watch now.

    --
    SIG FAULT: Post index out of bounds.
  79. Ageism anyone by hemp · · Score: 1

    Ageism is a live a well. That in addition to H1-b visas make for a dismal job market for those over 40.

    --
    Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    1. Re:Ageism anyone by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. I've been looking at IT job postings, and most call for 10, 12, or even 15 years of experience as a requirement. If that's ageism, it's reverse ageism.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    2. Re:Ageism anyone by hemp · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but at entry level pay right?

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    3. Re:Ageism anyone by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They don't typically post pay rates. But it isn't unusual to also see them demand expert knowledge in six or seven obscure and unrelated technologies, I'm sad to say.

      Still, if experience requirements mean anything, it is very unusual to see a job posting willing to hire anyone younger than 35 or 40. You can say anti-old-people-ageism exists, but all of my experience suggests the opposite.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  80. Arkansas (The Entire State) by gselfridge · · Score: 1

    Arkansas or anyplace in Arkansas was not mentioned in the 10 worst nor in the article describing where the IT jobs are. What does this imply?
    Is the state of Arkansas even a blip on the IT map?

  81. How about San Jose? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Aren't the real estate prices in San Jose the same as San Francisco? Add to that a slightly drier heat than NorCal and a city which is not even a real city, but just a big suburb (at the moment), I'd say San Jose deserves to be there more than San Francisco. CIO.com is utterly clueless.

    1. Re:How about San Jose? by hguorbray · · Score: 1

      Housing is considerably cheaper in other parts of the Bay Area than the peninsula in general and SF in particular although there are also some pricey areas in the South Bay as well -Los Altos, Saratoga, Cupertino and Los Gatos among others.

      but ~450k median housing price is way more reasonable than the 600k+ median of a few years ago
      http://www.mercurynews.com/realestatenews/ci_12578838

      wheras SF is considered to be a Buyer's market now because the median home price has dropped to a mere $950k
      http://www.altosresearch.com/research/CA/SAN+FRANCISCO

      ever since the .com boom young professionals have flocked to SF driving out older and low income residents

      as others have stated before there are literally hundreds of firms with IT needs here in Santa Clara and the other counties that ring the bay -but not so many in Oakland or SF -although Pixar is in Emeryville and Genentech and other Biotechs are in S San Francisco

      The problem in San Jose is that almost all the hitech jobs are up by the Bay (where it stays cool) in N San Jose, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale and Mtn View and most of the affordable housing is in the East and South Valley -which is why 101 237 and 880 are all parking lots going one direction each workday.

      I'm just sayin'

  82. compuware by junkgoof · · Score: 1

    I guess the location explains the utter uselessness of Comupuware software.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling
  83. Re:how your 0 and 16 foot ball team doing planing by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

    I hear they're petitioning the NFL to lengthen the season so they can get more games in, since otherwise they have no way to out-do themselves.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  84. Subjective? by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    What's so subjective about "Detroit, Arkansas and Cleveland suck"? Pretty good list, if you ask me. I could think of worse places than Orlando, though. No State income tax is nice.

    1. Re:Subjective? by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      What's so subjective about "Detroit, Arkansas and Cleveland suck"?

      Because the judgment that "such-and-such city sucks" in this case isn't based off of any objective data, merely the writer's opinions (whether justified or not). I don't think you really understand what "subjective" means.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  85. Great if you can afford it... by Koreantoast · · Score: 1

    That's great that you can afford it. However, many of us live in cities where there is a significant financial premium that needs to be paid in order to live in a car-free environment. Those who can't afford $300k+ USD for a loft are relegated to living in the suburbs.

  86. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  87. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  88. and you guys beat our team but we got 1 game by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    and you guys beat our team but we got 1 game

  89. The inverse is true as well by Slightly+Askew · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I was planning to move here to Denver, I had countless people on forums tell me how annoying it is that it's sunny all the time, how you have to practically ration your water, and other tales of woe. Only had one come right out and say that the residents don't want other people moving here (particularly Californians who drive up property values).

    --
    Public use of any portable music system is a virtually guaranteed indicator of sociopathic tendencies. -- Zoso
    1. Re:The inverse is true as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get off my LAWN! Damn Californians and Texans... (Hmm, I might be from CO, might be in Denver too...)

  90. Hollywood by tknd · · Score: 1

    But we have Hollywood. That is +50% culture and +1 happy citizen.

  91. I'm not sold by sissyneck67 · · Score: 1

    Living currently in Chicago, and seeing that nearly half of Chicago's population appears to be from Michigan, I'm not convinced Michigan is the great state everyone makes it out to be. All I see is a mass exodus into the city and a bunch of people pointing to somewhere on their hands, telling me how great the state they don't live in is.

  92. CentOS developers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was the name of that city a few years ago where the IT guy went ape-shit because his web server was displaying the default CentOS page... Turtleton? That would probably be the worst place to work in for IT.

    Ah, here it is: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/03/24/tuttle_centos/

  93. Washington DC, Beltway and Beyond by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    Way too crowded. Commuting is a full time job with the stress level of combat aircraft flying. I suspect the Metro has saved many people from stress related illnesses and deaths.

    Way too much poverty and crime way too close to everything else. Not knocking those directly affected, but it warps the brains of others. I did research at NIH. I had to travel across town to the VA hospital, through a very nasty part of town. I had no problems with the locals, but I did get accosted by one of DC's finest in a Metro station. He wanted to know when was the last time I sold heroin. No apology when he found out the truth.

    Way too expensive. Way way way. You could draw a series of concentric circles around DC by mapping how much the price of specific items is inflated. Buying stuff downtown is like buying it in an airport. If you're lucky you'll land a job that gives cost of living pay and other perks to offset the costs. I got an additional 70% on top of my NIH salary for cost of living, per diem, free Metro tickets, etc. But don't expect that for a regular IT job outside federal service.

    Way too rude. Whether in the grocery store, at the gas station, in the mall, or anywhere, people are so self absorbed that they'll block your path and not move, or plow right through you, as if you aren't even there. For every apology I heard there, I saw 20 faces with eyes staring ahead and refusing to acknowledge others so strenuously that they didn't even blink as they sailed by.

    Worst, those who IT serves tend to be so much more full of themselves than elsewhere that they treat any kind of support staff as second class denizens with horrible disfiguring contagious diseases. Within IT staffs (staves?) things seemed pretty peachy (I wasn't one, but I hung with them, and my wife was one of them). But the ungrateful goobs that munged their inbox by not deleting or archiving anything seemed to delight in trying to blame the IT people as well as trying to make it clear who was servant and who was served.

    Up sides: Metro (yeah, they had an accident. Check their incident per million passenger mile figures). Bethesda restaurants: more different nationalities and cultures represented in food in venues large and small. Always spendy, usually worth it, often more interesting and real atmosphere (as opposed to contrived) than most anywhere else.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
    1. Re:Washington DC, Beltway and Beyond by arghnoname · · Score: 1

      You couldn't write a much more accurate post about the DC area, at least not from my perspective. As for the Bethesda restaurants, well, I'm too busy getting reamed by the rest of the city to have any idea what those are like.

      If you want to be self-important though, you won't be alone.

      As for Metro, it's great if you live near a line and want to get into the city, but god forbid you live inbetween two spokes further out and want to go around in a circle. All the way in, all the way out. The proposed 'purple line' is supposed to help, but we'll see if that happens.

      But you're right about one thing, traffic is such a death-defying pursuit of hellish proportions, that if you value your sanity, you best make sure you get a job where you can make the commute easily. We're personally in the unfortunate situation of not easily being able to afford it.

      Oh, and if you're on the Maryland side, don't even think about public school unless you're loaded. (Housing bubble, grumble grumble)

  94. In Tampa by Augusto · · Score: 1

    I also work from home and live in Tampa. Don't really understand why they put Orlando on the list, it seems the writer doesn't like warm/sunny weather.

    Every time I met with co-workers outside the state, or go to a conference, people ask me what the heck I'm doing outside of FL and express a wish to work here too. The weather is great, and yes we have hurricanes but at least you get a fair warning.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
  95. What's wrong with Troy, NY? by mosel-saar-ruwer · · Score: 1


    What's wrong with Troy, NY?

    [Serious question.]

  96. Alaska is badass by atramentum · · Score: 1

    I'm working in IT in Alaska, and it's super badass. There is very little competition, and lots of idiots, so if you know your stuff you're good to go.

    1. Re:Alaska is badass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, I concur...it is superbad.

  97. San Francisco inclussion by guacamole · · Score: 1

    The inclusion of San Francisco was stupid. IT jobs are relatively plentiful and if you work in IT, you will afford to live in San Francisco. Moreover, who says you have to live in San Francisco to work there? There are plenty of commute possibilities. Live elsewhere in the peninsula, East Bay (Berkeley, Oakland, etc), Marin County, etc.. Yes, life is expensive, but also very cool. The reverse is also possible (some people who live in San Francisco work in east bay, etc).

    It's just mind numbing how could one possibly put San Francisco on the same list with those truly depressing rust-belt cities.

  98. Pros and cons of working in NYC. by MrCrassic · · Score: 1

    Not sure if someone's already done this, but here are some good and bad reasons to consider working here in "The City."
    Pros:

    • LOTS of IT jobs are available around here (though obviously not as many as there were pre-recession).
    • A fair amount of the offices here are actually really nice.
    • Nightlife is freaking outstanding, even if you're conservative.
    • The subway is actually really, really efficient during working hours.
    • Salaries are generally higher.
    • Tons upon tons of diversity (if that's of any importance).
    • Copious amounts of leisurely activities, many of which never age (in enjoyment).

    Cons

    • Living expenses are very high, especially now.
    • People are generally edgy, especially around Wall Street.
    • Pollution is something of a problem.
    • The atmosphere is VERY fast and somewhat unforgiving; it can cause a large transitional shock.
    • Don't even THINK of driving through the city (except from Monday to Thursday, 11PM to around 5AM).
    • Basic dining can be expensive, depending on where you're moving from.
    • The "New York" way of life might not be for everyone.

    Overall, I think that NYC is a great place to be and work in, and is especially a very good place to live if you're young and child-less. I wouldn't completely recommend it for families, but it's definitely do-able. (Children born and raised in NYC are of a different breed, though. The environment here can really make a difference, like anywhere else.)

  99. Boston by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The things that make Boston amazing can be experienced by traveling there 4 times over the different seasons for a week each, except the universities.

    Having lived in 14 different states, I've determined that climate is important to me. I want 4 seasons, but winter needs to be a few weeks only. No earthquakes, had enough of them in Arkansas and Tokyo. No hurricanes, had enough of them in Houston and Miami. Had enough taxes in DC and enough "Midwest boredom" in Fargo, Omaha, Minneapolis, Had enough southern bible thumping in Montgomery, Little Rock, Raleigh. Enough dust in Lubbock. Lubbock is, by far, the worst place I've lived.

    Austin and Atlanta are fantastic places, but water rationing in Austin sucks. Atlanta has a higher cost of living beyond the state income tax differential. I don't know why - inefficient government in GA, I guess.

    California is a wonderful place **to visit**. I've noticed that parts of my family that live their become "odd" after a year. Seattle and Washington state look amazing, but my politics don't really fit with theirs. I believe in true, proven science, not touchy feeling BS.

  100. Chicago sucks by Money+for+Nothin' · · Score: 1

    Lived and worked here all my life... It sucks.

    The weather sucks, the traffic sucks (especially when the weather particularly sucks), the business culture is truly and utterly insane (particularly the financial and trading industries that are so strong here), sales taxes are higher than anywhere in the nation (and there are taxes specifically on sodas - including diet sodas - and bottled water, and you need a license to do something as simple as wheel-around a hot-dog cart), apartments and owned housing is expensive almost anywhere within 45 min. of downtown (and where the exceptions exist, you wouldn't want to live there if you're white and/or earning a middle-class-or-higher income). Oh, and you can't own handguns (in abject spite of the Heller decision) and long-guns must be registered with the city and are subject to a variety of asinine rules that make a supposed "assault weapon" out of even many kinds of shotguns and rifles.

    And if you think our state governor is corrupt, try Chicago's Mayor Daley - he's even worse, but better at hiding his crimes.