Slashdot Mirror


AT&T's Bad Math Strikes MythBusters' Savage

etherlad writes "MythBusters' Adam Savage got a bill charging him $11,000 for 'a few hours' of Web surfing while in Canada, using his AT&T USB Mercury modem. AT&T gave him a quote on the data rate: '.015 cents, or a penny and a half, per kb.' Looks like AT&T didn't learn from Verizon's inability to do math. AT&T is also claiming Savage downloaded over 9 GB, which he calls 'frakking impossible.' Savage's huge following on twitter got him a speedy response by AT&T."

88 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bust the all the myths that the companies quote about why they need to charge what they do, reliability, and especially that there is competition in the marketplace?

    --
    A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    1. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by randomnote1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      lol...I don't think so. I think that everybody knows that myth is BUSTED!

    2. Re:Soz this mean we get a cellphone special now? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have seen this before - what is it about saying 0.02 cent when you mean 2 cent or 0.02 dollar?

      One time in science class, grade 10, we had to do something where we were given some basic info about an object made out of aluminum and the market cost of aluminum. We had to figure out the raw-material cost of the object, assuming no loss during construction. So we had to use our lessons on density and whatnot to figure out the exact mass of the object and then simply multiply by price.

      Problem is, most of us screwed up the ".02 cents per gram" (or whatever) part and did .02 dollars, so we were off by a factor of 100.

      Class response was... informative. The few observant students who got it looked smug. Some smacked their heads at missing that. A few were severely pissed that they got the question wrong over the one part of the question that had nothing to do with science. One got that part right but botched the density part of the problem. The underachievers were either confused by the whole thing or glad they didn't even try.

      And one guy... one guy spent ten minutes arguing with the teacher that .02 dollars and .02 cents were the same thing. Half a blackboard of diagrams later and she gave up trying to explain it.

      Now I know where that guy works.

  2. He should'a known... by clone53421 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ".015 cents, or a penny and a half"

    Let me guess... whichever is larger?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    1. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does that mean they "only" over-charged by 100X, so the bill should be $110 for a few hours? That's still outrageous, no?

    2. Re:He should'a known... by jd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, you divide the larger by the smaller.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    3. Re:He should'a known... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was roaming outside of the country, so it's not that bad, considering how much voice minutes are, too.

    4. Re:He should'a known... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Welcome to Canada, he almost got a better rate then we do here Rogers Wireless which is the only provider of GSM unless he was with Bell or Telus for CDMA / TDMA. In Canada you have to deal with one of the three (there is Fido but they are really Rogers) for 1GB(yes o.n.e) it is $30/month with a 3 cent overage calculated per KB, this is from the Rogers and Telus is actually 5 cents per MB. If you can figure out what Bell is actually offering your likely a natural genius but all the plans start at $45.

      You can tell I'm slightly bitter but paying this kinda dough just to have 'the right' to do what I want and have the same kind of access other places in the world have the opportunity to use it kind of makes me feel silly being Canadian.

    5. Re:He should'a known... by similar_name · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ".015 cents, or a penny and a half"
      Let me guess... whichever is larger?

      I can't believe no on Slashdot has pointed out that .015 cents != a penny and a half
      .015 dollars = a penny and a half.

    6. Re:He should'a known... by elashish14 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ok! Ok! I must have, I must have put a decimal point in the wrong place or something. Shit. I always do that. I always mess up some mundane detail.

      --
      I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    7. Re:He should'a known... by corsec67 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its ok, you can take your agression out on the printer.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    8. Re:He should'a known... by dotgain · · Score: 3, Funny

      What the fuck does that mean?

    9. Re:He should'a known... by compro01 · · Score: 2, Informative

      So the pricing is only as ridiculous as the ridiculous pricing on another item?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    10. Re:He should'a known... by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, no, no... You do it like this!

    11. Re:He should'a known... by Rogerborg · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pointing out that frakking "mistake" is the frakking point of the frakking article. You are not a frakking genius.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    12. Re:He should'a known... by RawsonDR · · Score: 3, Informative

      I can't believe no on Slashdot has pointed out that .015 cents != a penny and a half

      That's because that is suppose to be the obvious part, but isn't to surprisingly few people. That's the whole point.

      The rate really is 1.5 cents per KB, but it is constantly quoted as .015 cents.. that is, the number is typed out in dollars (.015) but because everyone knows that a price in fractions of dollars is really talking about cents, that's the unit spoken by a lot of people when interpreting it. "Point zero one five cents." And they don't understand that they have changed the value.

      It's not a matter of a haywire billing system, it a matter of false advertising by those who misquote it and to those who (gasp) interpret things literally - the ones who don't are just suckers.

    13. Re:He should'a known... by JWSmythe · · Score: 3, Interesting

          I was up in Canada for a coupe months, a while back (like, a few years ago). We learned quickly that the calls were expensive. Luckily, I got my first bill at home shortly after my arrival, so it was very obvious, and only several hundred dollars high. My work reimbursed my phone expense, and my cell calls suddenly became "state your emergency" and "I'll call you back from my land line", which was actually my Vonage phone plugged into a wireless bridge in the hotel. :) They still got me for international roaming, which was still a bastard.

          That's actually one of the nice things with the Vonage phone. If I'm out of town for more than a couple days, I bring a spare handset and the box, and plug it in when I settle in. I've gotten some strange looks wandering the halls of a hotel on my cordless phone, but the calls didn't cost me any extra. :)

          American cell phone providers are generally terrible. Our phones, for the most part, won't roam to Europe or Asia, but I've had people from Europe come here without any substantial problems. Ya, ya, I know the technical reasons. I don't like them, nor the contractual reasons. Cell phones are for portability, why can't I get on a plane in New York, and hop off in Hong Kong, and call home? For a 1 week job in Amsterdam, I picked up a cheap prepaid just so I had a number people could call.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    14. Re:He should'a known... by hattig · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is why call centre scripts should never use symbols, like "$1.50", or in this case "$0.015". They should explicitly write out what the person will say, i.e., "one dollar fifty", or "one point five cents". This is because people are incredibly stupid/prone to fluffing things up under stress, especially in a dull repetitive job dealing with annoyed customers.

      Anyway, 9 GB in a few hours eh? For casual web browsing? To get to 9 GB would require watching TEN HOURS of TWO MBIT video streams. I suspect YouTube is 500kbps so that's FORTY HOURS of YouTube. To consistently get two mbit on a 3G modem would be a miracle.

    15. Re:He should'a known... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 2, Informative

      The thing with lincoln on it is a one cent piece. There is no US coin called a penny.

      --
      This space available.
    16. Re:He should'a known... by Miseph · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Sprint's defense, they are already partially part GSM. Since they acquired Nextel in 200_ they've been operating the biggest iDEN network around (which is like being the smartest kid in special ed, but take what victories you can), and iDEN actually runs on a GSM backbone with extra spiffy bits to allow push-to-talk and the like. Hence, they are partially part GSM.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  3. Lucky for them by Wuhao · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm not sure what a crowd of angry MythBusters fans would do, but I'm sure that it would involve large amounts of kinetic energy.

    1. Re:Lucky for them by rackserverdeals · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's not the fans.

      You don't mess with people that blow stuff up for a living.

      Even if they're nerds.

      --
      Dual Opteron < $600
    2. Re:Lucky for them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    3. Re:Lucky for them by sentientbeing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ah violent angry mobs. Is there anything they cant do.

      The cause of, and answer to all lifes problems.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
  4. no way in hell! by FudRucker · · Score: 3, Funny

    there is no way in hell AT&T would be getting that kind of money out of me! you hear that AT&T?!!

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  5. from the people who brought you this commercial... by starblazer · · Score: 5, Funny

    IDK MY BFF JILL DOZ MTH 4 ATT

  6. Celebrity status? by elashish14 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish I could have a mass following behind me that I could use to blackmail evil corporations.... Instead, here I am just clicking away at every Microsoft ad I see hoping that it'll eventually rack up some respectable cost to them.

    -bitterness, sad face-

    --
    I have left slashdot and am now on Soylent News. FUCK YOU DICE.
    1. Re:Celebrity status? by hey! · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, when I was young, man moons ago, we used to have these things called "consumer protection laws". You could walk over to your phone and call a government hotline for help. Of course, you'd get a massive shock when you picked up the phone because of the electrostatic action of your polyester leisure suit, so I'd have to conclude that on the whole things aren't any better or worse than they used to be.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    2. Re:Celebrity status? by Binestar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, he's got 55,000 and growing followers on twitter. In the last 7 hours he's sent out a dozen or so tweets. To 55,000 people. 25 cents (.25 dollars) per text == AT&T making a lot of money off Adam's outrage.

      He just got commision =)

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    3. Re:Celebrity status? by njfuzzy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most people don't actually get their entire Twitter feed send to their phone.

      --
      My Photography - http://ian-x.com
      The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
    4. Re:Celebrity status? by Toonol · · Score: 2, Funny

      And those that do, deserve whatever AT&T charges them.

    5. Re:Celebrity status? by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh America!
      Being charged money to RECEIVE SMS and phone calls, absoloutely apalling, my condolences. :(

      - The rest of the world.

    6. Re:Celebrity status? by rdoger6424 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      We're charged to receive calls because the phone system in America does not differentiate between cell phones and landlines. I myself find it ridiculous that you have to pay MORE to call someone, just because their cell phone is a number! It costs 2 cents to call a landline in Greece, but it costs 20 cents to call a cell phone (using skype)! What the hell!?

      --
      "Hello 911? I just tried to toast some bread, and the toaster grew an arm and stabbed me in the face!"
    7. Re:Celebrity status? by grotgrot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Being charged to receive cell calls makes sense. In other countries such as the UK calling a cell phone costs the caller more than calling a landline. How do you know which you called? Cell phones have their own area code. In the US there are no area codes for cell phones so there is no way for a caller to know. Conceptually the call goes to the regular area code and then has to be transmitted by radio to your phone and the latter bit is why you are charged for incoming and outgoing calls. Of course it doesn't work like that under the hood any more but it used to in the begining. Either way someone is paying extra for the cell phone call cost.

      Some countries don't have this system but they aren't comparable to the US. All of the UK, NI and various islands fit in 2/3 of California. Germany is the same size as Montana. The scale is very different.

      SMS receiving used to be free. The reason for the charges is because of a corrupt market. The carriers have a cartel. They fought very hard against number portability. There are two different radio systems, and even the one used by the rest of the world (GSM) is on different frequencies. Phones are sold cheap but lock you into a two year contract and you are unlikely to be able to use a phone between carriers even if it is unlocked. All this minimizes the ability of consumers to change carriers. The cartel players also by some miraculous coincidence charge exactly the same for SMS. Whenever one raises the price, they all do.

      A secondary issue is that voice is charged too cheaply since that is what the headline number looked at by consumers is. Consequently the carriers make up for it by nickel and diming on every single other thing they can, including SMS.

  7. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by PayPaI · · Score: 4, Funny

    Math? Myth? Meth?

  8. Let's not be cynical by unlametheweak · · Score: 5, Funny

    Savage's huge following on twitter got him a speedy response by AT&T."

    I'm sure the response would have been just as fast if he wasn't famous and wasn't using Twitter. These large companies have professional Human Resource departments to make sure that the customer service experience is good.

    1. Re:Let's not be cynical by Nirac · · Score: 3, Informative

      Someone forgot to tell Verizon.

      http://verizonmath.blogspot.com/ (blogspot.com)
      It's long (27 minutes) and old, I know. Still worth a listen if you haven't heard it before. Also still funny if you have.

    2. Re:Let's not be cynical by somenickname · · Score: 4, Funny

      You forgot the part about him having in depth knowledge of explosives.

    3. Re:Let's not be cynical by etherlad · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes. I agree, and so does Adam.

      "I agree with everyone: it shouldn't just work for me. The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers."

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
    4. Re:Let's not be cynical by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I agree with everyone: it shouldn't just work for me. The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers."

      Why would they? What are you going to do if they screw you, anyway?

    5. Re:Let's not be cynical by memoryhole · · Score: 4, Funny

      The data carriers MUST stop thinking in kilobytes and start thinking in customers."

      Aaaaaah! Get out of my head! You're not allowed to think in me! ... why do I have a sudden urge to buy Lightspeed Briefs?

  9. Verizon? by Centurix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, *THERE'S* your problem.

    --
    Task Mangler
    1. Re:Verizon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not reading the article title much less the summary or article?

      Well, *THERE'S* your problem.

  10. Customer service? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FTA:

    [AT&T] hasn't exactly been garnering positive reactions from its legions of Twitter-using members.

    I'd say. If their customer service is anything like cell phone companies up here, it probably takes more than 140 characters to navigate their phone tree to talk to a human!

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  11. these insane usage charges by arbiter1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    anyone else think those companies are crooks for charging per kilobyte like that is complete bull s(*@# ? just loading a damn web page like cnn.com is almost 1MB so that would be 1$

    1. Re:these insane usage charges by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There's nothing wrong with charging per kilobyte. What they should do is *only* charge per kilobyte, and not differentiate between "voice", "local calls", "tethered data", "text messaging", etc. It's absurd that it's cheaper to acoustically-couple a 300-baud modem to your cell phone for 5 minutes than it is to transfer the equivalent amount of data over text messaging, despite the massive overhead of the audio traffic.

    2. Re:these insane usage charges by xeoron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, at the same time, one can protect themselves by using Lynx or W3m to browse the web via a phone.... or just turn off images, flash, video, etc. Come to think of it, sometimes I wish Firefox had mode extension for rendering like w3m or lynx

    3. Re:these insane usage charges by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It does. Install the Web Developer toolbar.
      Then click Disable > Java, Disable > JavaScript, CSS > Disable Styles > All Styles, Images > Disable Images > All Images. Voila. You're now running Netscape 1.0 (sans images); an adjustment to font settings and you're using Lynx. :)

    4. Re:these insane usage charges by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      Opera is pretty good at it - it has toolbar buttons to disable images (or only show cached), CSS, and so on. I'm pretty sure I've seen similar Firefox plugins, too.

  12. First response... by Landshark17 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Upon seeing the bill I'm sure his first response was, "I reject your reality and replace it with my own!"

    --
    This sig is false.
    1. Re:First response... by Whillowhim · · Score: 2, Informative

      Turn in your Geek card. The corrected quote is:
      "I reject your reality and substitute my own"

      Also applicable to Ahmedinejad when the election results came in.

    2. Re:First response... by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or Michael Jackson when they told him he was black.

      Or alive.

    3. Re:First response... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      After the autopsy, the doctors decided to melt down all the plastic in MJ and turn it into legos, so little boys could play with him for once, not the other way around.

  13. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Math busted.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  14. Re:from the people who brought you this commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    and this is what I think of her math skillz

  15. Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Two of the most powerful entities in the world are humbled by Twitter. Be afraid, be very, very afraid.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  16. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by taucross · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When you're trying to divide and conquer, any communication is scary.

    --
    "In the absence of the ability to establish the attribute of truth they tried to establish the noble attributes."
  17. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by pushf+popf · · Score: 5, Interesting

    AT&T clearly states on their website its $0.015 which translates to 1.5 cents per KB.

    I've been around since data was shoveled through modems that were so slow that you could actually type faster than the modem could transfer, and data was sent dial-up over expensive long distance phone lines.

    And it was still cheaper than 1.5 cents/KB.

    Does AT&T send a free jar of Vaseline with each new contract?

  18. Re:Famous power by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 2, Funny

    They don't offer any lube.

  19. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Twitter is naught but the horn by which the crowd hears itself.

    AT&T and Iran are being faced with that most awesome and powerful of forces: human beings. Acting in concert. Each of their own free will. :) Democracy rules.

  20. Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bill by failedlogic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This stuff always makes the headlines when the bill amounts to 1,000's of dollars. The real problem is that there are probably a constant stream of people being billed $5, $20, maybe $50 for the usage. When they pass it off and just pay it, then the company lines its pockets with easy money.

  21. Okay, I'll bite... by tehtrex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    9GB of data is 9,437,184 KB. The numbers don't add up.

    ".015 cents": 9,437,184 KB * $0.00015 = $1,415.5776
    "a penny and a half": 9,437,184 KB * $0.015 = $141,557.76

    Since the published data roaming rate in Canada is $0.015/KB, let's go with "a penny and a half".

    $11,000 of usage at $0.015/KB equals 733,333.33333333...KB or 716.145833MB.

    So not only do they not know the difference between a cent and a dollar, but their system for measuring data transfer is also off by a factor of ~12.87... unless they somehow billed him for .015 cents and then tacked on 10k in fees...

    1. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by tehtrex · · Score: 2, Informative

      They(AT&T) charge per kilobit. Almost all network transfer rates are measured (and advertised) in bits, not bytes.

      Except network transfer rates == speed. Network transfer rates != volume.

      Furthermore, according to their site, they charge by the Kilobyte (KB), not the Kilobit (Kb): http://www.wireless.att.com/businesscenter/popup/dataconnect-comp-table.jsp

      "1,024 kilobytes (KB) = 1 megabyte (MB). For coverage information and maps, please see a sales representative or visit att.com/wirelesscoveragemap or att.com/wirelessbroadbandconnect."

      "CANADA AND INTERNATIONAL ROAMING: Additional data for Canada roaming per KB is $0.015; International roaming per KB is $0.0195."

    2. Re:Okay, I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's per kilobit, not byte. 9,437,184 * 8 * $0.00015 = 11,324.6208 ~ 11,000

  22. .015 cents per kilobit by slashqwerty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Given the way the math works out I'm going to say it's .015 cents per kilobit. AT&T claims he used 9 gigabytes. That is 9,663,676,416 bytes = 9,437,184 kilobytes* = 77,309,411.328 kilobits. At .015 cents per kilobit it comes out to $11,596.41. The summary claims he was charged $11,000.

    * down with the kibi prefix!

  23. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem is if you *call* in, because, say you're travelling and have a phone but no good net connection, they say on the phone it is point zero one five cents per kilobyte. I know, because I've called and asked and spent the same 'stupid' time explaining to them I wanted to know if that point zero one five dollars per kilobyte or point zero one five cents, and had to explain that they're NOT THE SAME THING. So, yes, he was very likely quoted exactly the point zero one five cents rate.

  24. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by ksemlerK · · Score: 2, Informative

    Review each line of EVERY bill. Last month they attempted to charge me data twice. I called them and told them where to look on the bill. I got $50 credited to my account because I caught it. ($35 for double charge, $15 for who the hell knows why). ALWAYS do a line item inventory of your bill, EVERY month. ALWAYS contest suspicious charges. Usually they can be cleared up with nothing more then a 20 minute phone call.

  25. A Billing System Deficiency by carlzum · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No one should be held liable for outrageous bills like this. AT&T failed to put reasonable controls in their billing system so customers are alerted when there's an obvious technical error, unauthorized use, or a simple mistake. American Express says my credit line is unlimited, but if I try to spend $100k they will decline the purchase and contact me. If I had a history of paying $100k bills they may allow it. But AT&T allows an account that's never exceeded a few hundred dollars reach $11,000. We all know why, unlike American Express, AT&T doesn't incur $11,000 in expenses so they don't bother doing anything about it.

    It doesn't make any sense to me. Most people are unable to pay the bill, and anyone that can afford it has the resources to fight them. Either way, it generates a lot of bad PR and very little revenue. I'm surprised Apple hasn't put more pressure on them, these stories are frequently reported as "man receives $10,000 iPhone bill."

    1. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by wwphx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Customer service Epic Fail. I find it interesting that people aren't mentioning that this is actually Cingular, AT&T cellular died years ago and was bought out by Cingular, who later re-branded as AT&T because they thought that had better name recognition. AT&T flubbed a CRM install and it tanked their customer service, and they died. It just happened that the two companies used the same cellular technology (GSM or whatever) and a merger was possible. Sadly, Cingular's customer service was really no better than AT&T's, so you're still dealing with a sad and lonely monster.

      I use Alltel. Driving to work a week ago I got a text message saying that my account had high usage and I needed to call them. My wife had just spent a week on the other side of the country, her cell is an additional line on my plan. We spent a lot of hours playing WoW and talking while she was gone, and I didn't know she was roaming. $600 worth of charges. Alltel saw the problem, contacted me, and offered me a plan upgrade for $20 a month that gave me unlimited nation-wide roaming, and that by doing it, it would be retroactive and I wouldn't be hit with a $600 phone bill.

      THAT is customer service. I don't know what AT&T provides, but it ain't customer service. Cellular service in the USA has always been hideously monopolistic compared to a lot of the world, and somehow they get away with it. Hopefully that will change some day, probably the same day that I can easily buy an iPhone from an Alltel store and not have to deal with AT&T.

      --
      When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
    2. Re:A Billing System Deficiency by TheQuantumShift · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, updates when your bill doubles last months total would be nice, but the real problem would be with cust. service reps who say one thing when it's actually another. Some might see an all too convenient oversight that benefits giant megacorp, I just see a bored 20 something single mother working the callcenter grind who couldn't define the word kilobyte with a gun to her head. She just reads the stuff shes supposed to read, and what does it matter when she says kilobit or kilobyte? Same thing right? One's just the british spelling...

      Now if AT&T invested in it's employees and ensured they were trained, this kind of stuff wouldn't happen so much. But since outsourcing is the answer to everything (except management of course) it'll always be a battle of carrier said, outsourced call center said, customer said.

      And of course they should stop with the per-anything billing. Limit the data speed enough so I can still browse, but torrenting an .iso is out of the question. Charge a flat rate, and don't nickel and dime.

      --

      Shift happens. Fire it up.
  26. Re:You're fucking stupid by Hal_Porter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sir, you get one "fuck" per post for free on the Basic Slashdot PricePlan(tm) as you can see on page 2539 of your contract. We assumed from your post that you've decided to take advantage or automatic update process to the Slashdot Super High Enterprise Class Ultra Premium PricePlan(tm) as described in page 1845 of your contract. Yes, that is $199.99 per month plus sale tax and there's a $9599.99 plus sales tax service charge if you change to a plan with a lower monthly price in the first 48 months. Page 3453 of the contract. Well then your copy is updated. I've got the latest contract here, dated 29th of June. Yes 29th of June 2009. Um Sir, there's no need for that language ... Sir the audio quality on this line is kind of bad and I can't hear you very well, and I'll need to change to my headset. CLICK. BRRRR.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  27. Re:$15,000 per GB by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Informative

    OK, even at $0.015 per K, you're talking about $15 per MB, or $15,000 per GB. To do 1 GB in an hour requires 3 mbps. How many mobile data connections out there achieve 3 mbps?

    Outside the US, plenty. HSDPA is 7.2mbps.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  28. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We'll claim Iran was humbled when we see some actual results. All we've seen so far is more beatings than there would have been without the internet.

    --
    My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
  29. My favorite quotes from the article by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 4, Funny

    "nobody wants to mess with a man who blows things up for a living."

  30. Wireless broadband data charges are insane... by Aereus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone else think it's bordering on insanity the charges they want to levy against people for wireless data transfers? (Text messages is a whole other topic...) Even the new download caps some cable ISPs are setting for home broadband are still at least 100GB for a connection you spend ~$50 for. Why is it worth thousands of dollars to send a GB of data when a normal phone conversation is going to take up far more network bandwidth...

  31. Re:Iran and AT&T vs. Twitter by Magic5Ball · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You've mistaken the mob for democracy.

    --
    There are 1.1... kinds of people.
  32. why is it so expensive anyway? by speedtux · · Score: 3, Informative

    I don't understand why data is so hugely expensive in the US anyway. In Europe, you get unlimited data plans starting at EU 5/month (EU 25/month for unlimited 3.5G usage). Or you can buy 3G access day-by-day for EU 2.50/day. Some plans have international data roaming caps anywhere within Europe at EU 15/day.

  33. Re:Its 1.5 cents per KB by speedtux · · Score: 2, Funny

    It clearly states in the contract that the rates... are subject to change and new rates can be published by AT&T at any time.

  34. Solution: prepaid international SIM card by speedtux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't use US carrier SIM cards for international travel: you get no cost control and high rates for data.

    Your best bet is to get a local, prepaid SIM card. In some countries, you can get day-by-day data subscriptions for a few bucks a day.

    If you can't do that, your next best bet is to get an international prepaid SIM card. Their rates are a little higher, but they are still fairly low, and they are fairly low across the entire globe.

    Either way, you get cost control: they can't charge you more than you prepaid.

    Search on Google; there are many companies offering this service. Oh, and you need a GSM phone, preferably one that supports tethering. Most Nokias running Symbian will work and you just plug them into your laptop and they work as a 3G modem; they also have good E-mail readers.

    (Nokias are a bit old-fashioned in that they ask you for every Internet connection you make; normally, that's a nuisance, but for data roaming, it's great.)

  35. I can't believe they're still doing this... by lumbricus · · Score: 2, Informative

    anyone else remember 0.002 dollar = 0.002 cent from two years ago?
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2isSJKntbg

  36. Only in the US... by torkus · · Score: 3, Informative

    Only in the US do you have this insanity. I'm returning from a trip to Stockholm and you can get unlimited 7.2MB broadband for about 40 bucks a month including taxes. 25 if you already have a phone plan. My swedish is lacking, but poking around with google translator I didn't find anything about bandwidth caps.

    Again: $25-40US for UNLIMITED 7.2Mb broadband. Including taxes.

    Off the top of my head, not a single major WIRED provider in the US even matches that price ... and many are talking about implementing bandwidth caps. Wireless? Bah. No big provider is unlimited and you're coughing up at least $60 + taxes and good luck actually getting 7.2Mb.

    --
    You can get rich if you own a politician, but you have to be rich to buy one in the first place.
  37. Is incredible how outrageous are the roaming fees. by jbssm · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Just imagine how much the phone companies are winning with all the roaming crap, it's doesn't cost nearly as much as they want us to believe.

    Sincerely I really appreciate the market regulation we have in the EU, I think it's a great thing for the consumer. Starting next month the phone companies will be able to charge the maximum of 0,13 EUR per SMS (VAT included) sent while in roaming (in here we never pay for received SMS, in or out the country), well, it's great, but the most absurd is that the plan I have now makes me pay 0,167 EUR per SMS sent inside my own country!

    I'm sure EU didn't make this 0,13 EUR price without reason, it's surely enough to pay the home operator and the abroad one their actual service charges and still give them some profit, so just think for a while how much this guys are earning.

    They also cut the voice fees to acceptable levels, and in 2 years we shall not pay for received call while abroad and made calls must be charged by the second (at their maximum imposed cap rate per full minute divided by 60) :D

    So, all in all, market regulation can be a very good thing if done properly.

  38. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or, more likely, the guy on the other end will take your name, phone number, address, and a statement of the complaint. Then they'll reassure you that they'll get right on it, and thanks for calling. Click.

    Unless you're a TV celebrity, a Congressman, or at least an appellate judge good luck getting them to do a thing for you.

  39. Re:Is this really "only" a problem with a huge bil by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ALWAYS demand an itemised bill. ALWAYS. No exceptions, EVER

    No problem sir - we'll just add on the itemized bill option for $4.95 per month. If you'd like it actually mailed to you instead of buried on a website I can do that too for only $3.95 more.

    Oh, since you're concerned about getting raped on minutes you don't intend to use, for a mere $6.95 we'll let you set a limit on your usage so that you won't get billed for unintended calls. No, that won't help with roaming charges. We're looking into an experimental $14.95 service to handle those - would you like to be in our pilot group?

    The phone company: all about finding clever ways to charge you for stuff that should be required as a matter of law...

  40. Same happened to me with Rogers by Wayne247 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a Canadian client of Rogers, and while we were on vacation in Mexico a few months ago, we decided to use the Palm Treo we brought for some basic web surfing and email checking (swine flu panic, get some information for airports and whatnot).

    So I call their handy and free 611 customer service, and ask for roaming charges. "What phone do you have?" she asks. "Palm Treo 650." She then tells me the charges for data are "Three cents per kilobyte." - "Sure?" - "Yes."

    It sounded cheap, but not too cheap to be impossible. To be sure, I went to an internet cafe at the corner, and checked Rogers website. Impossible to know for sure, but I could find two information: 3 cents per MEGAbyte, applied to ordinary phones, and 3 cents per KILObyte applied to smartphones, especially the iPhone.

    So we used it, thinking it would be 3/KB, but reasonably because, afterall, it's only a Treo and there's not much you can do on the web with it.

    Upon my return, I got a bill for 80$ in data roaming charges. I fought it, had the issue escalated, I even DARED them to "Go listen to the recorded conversation" that they keep on file for "training and enhancement purposes". They finally caved in and removed all the charges from my bill, except 10$, which was satisfactory.

    It's really bad when you are considered guilty until you can prove innocence.

    Rogers do that kind of stuff frequently. I just upgraded to an iPhone and had to call them because each and every rebate/discount I previously had, and each bargain/rebate I managed to negociate on my new contract, they all disappeared mysteriously from the new invoice. Of coures it's a mistake. Of course the system had a hiccup and my order was not processed fully. Riiight.

    But all in all, because I'm quite vocal about my consumer rights and will gladly voice them to the companies I deal with, I end up with a pretty interesting contract, and the services are good, so I'm, afterall, a happy customer.

  41. More regulation on abusive practices is needed by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm really hoping this swing back towards more regulation will put a stop to these kinds of abuses. They are obviously far out of line with real world costs and every provider is in collusion. The same goes for text messaging 'costs', which cost magnitudes less than a phone call to transmit.

    1. Re:More regulation on abusive practices is needed by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually for the most part they cost virtually nothing since the signal that the sms data is in is being sent ANYWAY, they just stick a little extra data in there and plain text is microscopic in terms of how much data it makes up. Isn't it something on the order of a few bytes for a word?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
  42. Re:You're fucking stupid by syousef · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sir, you get one "fuck" per post for free on the Basic Slashdot PricePlan(tm)

    Slashdot is pimping?

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer