Slashdot Mirror


Something May Have Just Hit Jupiter

The blog of Anthony Wesley, an Australian amateur astronomer, has what may be the first photos of a recent comet or asteroid impact on Jupiter, near the south pole. These photos are 11 hours old. The ones at the bottom of the page show three small dark spots in addition to the main dark mark. The Bad Astronomy blog picked up the story a few hours later — but cautions that what we're seeing may not be an impact event. This is all reminiscent of the closely watched impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy on Jupiter in 1994.

299 comments

  1. thats nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but when is it OUR turn :(

    1. Re:thats nice and all by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've often heard Jupiter called the "vacuum cleaner" of space in that it sucks up foreign objects that stray into our solar system. Be thankful we have this planet among us. It's sorta like our protector.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:thats nice and all by ls671 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well be careful, it could also something like what has happened on the 2010 movie starting to occur, keep on watching maybe this "spot" will propagate to the whole planet then afterward, Jupiter will become our second Sun.
      Welcome to true global warming ! ;-))

      --
      Everything I write is lies, read between the lines.
    3. Re:thats nice and all by DeusExCalamus · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Well be careful, it could also something like what has happened on the 2010 movie starting to occur, keep on watching maybe this "spot" will propagate to the whole planet then afterward, Jupiter will become our second Sun. Welcome to true global warming ! ;-))

      Hail Lucifer!

      --
      "...Sleep comes like a drug in God's country Sad eyes, crooked crosses in God's country..."
    4. Re:thats nice and all by fork_daemon · · Score: 1

      I remember watching a Documentary on Earth and the conditions that made it. They called Jupiter our Big Brother for this very protective vacuum cleaner effect.

    5. Re:thats nice and all by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a vacuum cleaner, it's gravity isn't so powerful as to pull other objects out of orbit per se. Sure, it probably gets hit more than other planets, but that's not that impressive. It fills less of its Hill Sphere than Earth does, so it's more likely to scatter a passing object than absorb it. And a recent study by Grazier and Newman demonstrated that it probably is taking more pot-shots at Earth than it is protecting us.

    6. Re:thats nice and all by antonyb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Out of interest, where else have you watched documentaries?

      Ant.

    7. Re:thats nice and all by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      More like the fat kid in high school that often got in the way of sneak spitball attacks.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:thats nice and all by silent_artichoke · · Score: 3, Funny

      Folks, let's hear it for Ant. He'll be here all week. Don't forget to tip your waitress!

    9. Re:thats nice and all by Ohrion · · Score: 1

      I don't know why, but your comment made me laugh more than any other I've read in a while.

    10. Re:thats nice and all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's gravity isn't so powerful as to pull other objects out of orbit per se.

      Actually it's believed that our orbit is not a proper circle around the Sun because the Earth is pulled away from the sun by the massive gravity of Jupiter.

      Sure, it probably gets hit more than other planets, but that's not that impressive. It fills less of its Hill Sphere than Earth does, so it's more likely to scatter a passing object than absorb it.

      Although the planet has very little solid area the gravity pull objects which enter the atmosphere towards the center preventing them from leaving without enough escape velocity. Other objects are probably also pulled by the gravity of the planet and captured into orbit.

      And a recent study by Grazier and Newman demonstrated that it probably is taking more pot-shots at Earth than it is protecting us.

      The amount of space in the inner solar system is so massive and the planets are so small that most objects flung into our region of space by Jupiter will not hit anything. Most objects will be pulled by the powerful gravity of the Sun before being drawn to the weak gravity of the planets.

  2. Alternate site for slashdotted article by Romancer · · Score: 5, Informative
    --


    ) Human Kind Vs Human Creation
    ) It'd be interesting to see how many humans would survive to serve us.
    1. Re:Alternate site for slashdotted article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  3. Or may not have by intx13 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An amateur astronomer puts up pictures on his blog and we're comparing it to Shoemaker-Levy?

    Bad Astronomy says "it's jumping the gun to call it an impact event before we get more observations". I've got an idea for the next Slashdot article: "Asteroid heading towards earth - or maybe just spot on lense".

    1. Re:Or may not have by davester666 · · Score: 1

      But there's no time. We must launch the shuttle with a bunch of nuclear weapons if we are to be able to divert the asteroid so it will miss the Earth.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    2. Re:Or may not have by gammaraybuster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If it is an impact, then what else is there to compare it to? According to the blogger, there was no sign whatever of the event just 2 days earlier. Can a storm arise that quickly out of nothing? In any case, it seems likely that they will soon be able to determine if it is an impact or not.

    3. Re:Or may not have by Aussie · · Score: 0, Redundant

      An amateur astronomer puts up pictures on his blog and we're comparing it to Shoemaker-Levy?

      Bad Astronomy says "it's jumping the gun to call it an impact event before we get more observations". I've got an idea for the next Slashdot article: "Asteroid heading towards earth - or maybe just spot on lense".

    4. Re:Or may not have by Aussie · · Score: 5, Informative

      >An amateur astronomer puts up pictures on his blog and we're comparing it to Shoemaker-Levy?

      Levy is an amateur, his degree is in english lit. He won an amateur astronomers award.

      (what I tried to post last time, bloody web2 crap)

    5. Re:Or may not have by dmartine40 · · Score: 1

      I knew something was up with this story. I saw the headline and for a split second thought I was on the Onion!

    6. Re:Or may not have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got an idea for the next Slashdot article: "Asteroid heading towards earth - or maybe just spot on lense".

      Ok, I've submitted it, just after my '2009 is the Year of the Linux Desktop!!1!' article.

    7. Re:Or may not have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure it wasn't Bobby Knight's?

    8. Re:Or may not have by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      It could just be a huge zit. Your basic case of acne, brought on by global warming. Those damned humans, and their fossil fuels.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    9. Re:Or may not have by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Funny

      And I knew I should never have given my girlfriend the keys to the asteroid...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    10. Re:Or may not have by GreenTech11 · · Score: 1

      A spot on the lens that conveniently is moving across the lens at exactly the right speed to keep pace with another object on Jupiter? It may not be an impact mark, but it is the result of something, and appeared in only a few days.

      --
      Laughter is the best medicine, except if you have a broken rib.
    11. Re:Or may not have by dido · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's the amateurs that tend to be the first to discover unknown stuff like comets and stuff. The professionals are in general engaged in directed research and do not have the time to be poking around random areas of the sky to see if anything interesting is going on there. As someone mentioned, David Levy is himself an amateur.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    12. Re:Or may not have by uofitorn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Did you check who the editor was before reading the submission? I made the same mistake and didn't. When I remember, I usually skip right over kdawson's posts, unless it's a slow work day.

      --
      "What kind of music do pirates listen to?" -Paul Maud'dib
      "Yeeeaaarrrrr n' Bee!!" -Stilgar, Leader of Sietch Tabr
    13. Re:Or may not have by init100 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Many people seem to think that amateur is a synonym for incompetent.

    14. Re:Or may not have by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What's worse, many people seem to think that professional is a synonym for competent.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Or may not have by SlashWombat · · Score: 1

      Christ, the Jovians have one little nuclear war, and we think it has been an asteroid impact.

    16. Re:Or may not have by dintech · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? That sounds suspiciously like Chuck Noris' chair rather than something that might belong to Balmer...

    17. Re:Or may not have by Sique · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or, as the german philosopher Schopenhauer famously put it:

      Dilletants! Dilletants! - so are called those, who are occupied by a Science or an Art out of love to it, per il loro diletto, with disdain by those who do it for profit, because they love only the money which can be earned by it. This disdain is based on the dastard conviction, that nobody would ever seriously take on a subject if not distress, famine, or another greed urges it. The public is of the same spirit and thus has the same opinion: from here comes his respect for "people of the trade", and his mistrust of amateurs. In reality for the amateur the subject is the goal, for the man of the trade as himself it is only means. Only he will carry on with earnest who is immediately interested in the subject and who is occupied with it out of love. From those, not from the paid servants, the greatest has ever started.

      (Sorry for my bad english. I am an amateur after all ;) )

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    18. Re:Or may not have by mikerubin · · Score: 1

      You think it was the Jovians?
      No, they're too peace loving.
      It was a North Korean missile test.

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    19. Re:Or may not have by init100 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I completely agree.

    20. Re:Or may not have by StupiderThanYou · · Score: 1

      Here are the latest images at a more, um, robust location. Note the confirmation from JPL/NASA.

    21. Re:Or may not have by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      One cool thing that Shoemaker/Levy had that this doesn't is a known cause. There was a known comet, on course to hit Jupiter, and lo and behold, after it was expected to hit Jupiter, there were new spots. This is just a new spot that looks similar to the Shoemaker/Levy spots but which could plausably have another cause other than impact.

      --
      ...
    22. Re:Or may not have by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. Care to cite your out-gassing?

      See what a few minutes of Googling turned up:
      Catalogue of Comet Discoveries
      Near-Earth Asteroid Discovery Statistics

      --
      0xfeedface
    23. Re:Or may not have by metallurge · · Score: 2, Informative
      I like this quote a great deal. I took the liberty of smoothing the English only a little, while keeping the essential translational word choices the same. I humbly offer it:

      Dilettantes! Dilettantes! - so they are called, who are occupied by a Science or an Art out of love for it, per il loro diletto, with disdain by those who do it for profit, because they love only the money which can be earned by it. This disdain is based on the dastardly conviction, that nobody would ever seriously take on a subject if not urged to it by distress, famine, or another greed. The public is of the same spirit and thus has the same opinion: from here comes its respect for "people of the trade", and its mistrust of amateurs. In reality, for the amateur, the subject is the goal. For the tradesman, it is only a means. Only he who is immediately interested in the subject and who is occupied with it out of love will carry it on with earnestness. From those, not from the paid servants, have the greatest achievements ever begun.

    24. Re:Or may not have by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It was a North Korean missile test.

      Based on where it struck, I'd say this nuke could have been aimed at American soil!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    25. Re:Or may not have by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      An amateur astronomer puts up pictures on his blog and we're comparing it to Shoemaker-Levy?

      Right.... it's not like any amateur astronomer could have discovered something like comet Shoemaker-Levy 9. David Levy would be spinning in his grave to hear of this... well, if he was dead that is. Or not an amateur astronomer.

    26. Re:Or may not have by StickANeedleInMyEye · · Score: 1

      That damned random Jupiter!! Who would think to look THERE??

    27. Re:Or may not have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough, most of them don't have English degrees.

    28. Re:Or may not have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or 5 of them, black holes is what they look like. you see, the thing about space is... it's black and the thing about black holes is.....they're black.

    29. Re:Or may not have by dunng808 · · Score: 1

      This event could be attributed to the poet Grunthos the Flatulent. Good thing we have not launched a manned mission to Mars yet, least they all die of internal hemorrhaging!

      --

      Gary Dunn
      Open Slate Project

    30. Re:Or may not have by Zancarius · · Score: 1

      (Sorry for my bad english. I am an amateur after all ;) )

      I know you were jesting, but I feel the need to tell you that your English is far, far better than that of most native speakers. I've always admired those who can speak my native tongue far better than I could ever hope to speak theirs.

      --
      He who has no .plan has small finger. ~ Confucius on UNIX
    31. Re:Or may not have by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you're right. But can someone please explain why there is some juvenille at the other end of the Universe throwing rocks at us?

    32. Re:Or may not have by kjllmn · · Score: 1

      Well, amateur astronomers observing actually have made quite a few important contributions to the science of astronomy.

    33. Re:Or may not have by metaforest · · Score: 1

      I still have a lot of the SL9 impact pictures, and comparing them to this black mark... there are quite a few similarities especially in the edge detail. It's a shame that a larger telescope didn't get a look at it.

      IANAPA but I do think this looks like an impact disturbance in the upper cloud layers, when compared to similar impacts from SL9.

  4. Just hit jupiter by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, just up and hit it. No warning, no reason, just a wild haymaker out of nowhere. Didn't even see the guy.

    Man, that's going to leave a spot.

    1. Re:Just hit jupiter by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Next time, Jupiter better get his damned beer when he tells him to!

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Just hit jupiter by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I thought I heard a really loud "OW!" last night.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Just hit jupiter by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does the tear look a little like an anus... Does this mean that Jupiter just got tore a new one?

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
  5. Super Comet Fragment Impact Very Large Explosions by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's all sing another round of Super Comet Fragment Impact Extra-Large Explosions by Kare and Higgins.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  6. Good to see it doing it's job by spankyofoz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The gas giants are there to act as a magnet for comets/asteroids etc, so they don't end up near us.

    --

    - There is no point, it's like a sphere -
    1. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by networkzombie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but if we didn't see this one coming, what if next time the gas giants don't do their job? T-Rex says "Only humans can prevent global extintion level events."

    2. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gas giants are there to act as a magnet for comets/asteroids etc, so they don't end up near us.

      I don't remember that part of Genesis...

    3. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, at this point, I would rather a few were by us. I think that we are going to need the minerals and elements, and have a few close by with different minerals could be useful. In particular, China is the main supplier of Rare Earth and a few steel making minerals, but they are purposely holding them off the market. All in all, I think that if we want to avoid war, we need to make sure that all nations have access to these. Probably the more interesting way would be to mine space.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    4. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by fireheadca · · Score: 1

      The gas giants are there to act as a magnet for comets/asteroids etc, so they don't end up near us.

      I don't remember that part of Genesis...

      Which part do you remember?

    5. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't mean it like that... just that they happen to do this. He didn't actually mean that it's what they're there for afaik.

    6. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by tumutbound · · Score: 5, Funny

      The gas giants are there to act as a magnet for comets/asteroids etc, so they don't end up near us.

      I don't remember that part of Genesis...

      Which part do you remember?

      I remember Phil Collins great drumming and Peter Gabriels vocals. Of course this was the old Genesis not the reformed one.

    7. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2

      I remember Phil Collins great drumming and Peter Gabriels vocals. Of course this was the old Genesis not the reformed one.

      Yes, Phil Collins did great drumming and Peter Gabriel is a great singer, but they are much better apart than they are together. So, the whole Jupiter-Earth combination is kind of an anti-pre-reformed-Genesis.

    8. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by malus314 · · Score: 1

      That Jupiter, what a great worker I tell you! Always cleaning up after Saturn drops the ball! Someone ought to have that planet fired and just give Jupiter it's paycheck!
      There is a reason GM wants to sell it, after all!

      Oh, wait...

    9. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by wellingj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What would be wrong with the prospecting model that was used during all the gold rush years?
      After that fizzles we can move to the homesteading rush.

      If you think about it, it's probably the fastest way to colonize space, because I don't see the super powers doing much more than having a global pissing match over what is already here....

    10. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by bigbadvoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, "It was thought that the planet served to partially shield the inner system from cometary bombardment. However, recent computer simulations suggest that Jupiter doesn't cause a net decrease in the number of comets that pass through the inner Solar System, as its gravity perturbs their orbits inward in roughly the same numbers that it accretes or ejects them." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jupiter#Interaction_with_the_Solar_System

    11. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by rs79 · · Score: 5, Funny

      " Yes, Phil Collins did great drumming and Peter Gabriel is a great singer, but they are much better apart than they are together. So, the whole Jupiter-Earth combination is kind of an anti-pre-reformed-Genesis."

      Holst that thought.

      --
      Need Mercedes parts ?
    12. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by rm999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to mention that Jupiter's orbit keeps it close to a lot of asteroids (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:InnerSolarSystem-en.png). Kind of beautiful: the Sun basically has a huge, sparse ring around it.

      And here's a deep thought: if the asteroid belt had been closer to the Sun, there is a good chance we wouldn't be alive to wish it weren't ;)

    13. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Jesus he knows me
      and he knows I'm right
      I've been talking to Jesus all my life
      oh yes he knows me
      and he knows I'm right
      well he's been telling me
      everything's gonna be alright

      Won't find me practising what I'm preaching
      won't find me making no sacrifice
      but I can get you a pocketful of miracles
      if you promise to be good, try to be nice
      God will take good care of you
      just do as I say, don't do as I do

    14. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Fumus · · Score: 1

      I see a tiny problem here. In order for the amount of minerals to be actually useful at all, the asteroid would have to be quite large. And we all know the larger the asteroid, the bigger impact Earth gets.

    15. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that it is exactly what we need. NASA will report what is found which will leave it open to another nation to haul down, while if private industry sends a remote probe around (say launched via falcon9 heavy and using a vasmir/nuke drive) to hop amonst the asteroids, it would make prefect sense.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    16. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Of course, you could bring it earth and place it in an orbit, and mine it, or simply break it up prior to re-entry (that would lose a lot of mineral though).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    17. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by HasselhoffThePaladin · · Score: 1

      They are locking ... lasers ... sir. - Lt. Cmd. Worf

      Sorry for the OT, but I believe that quote came from the episode "The Outrageous Okona", which makes it said by Lieutenant Worf, not Lieutenant Commander Worf. I'm really sorry, but I'm going to have to take your geek card. I'll be departing my parents' basement in approximately three weeks for my monthly Cheetos and Red Bull trip, I will collect it then.

    18. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Fumus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Dude. If he had the technology to place a nearby asteroid in our orbit, then lack of rare minerals would be a minor inconvenience.

    19. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if it hit us, there would be nobody to say ``something may have just hit earth'' :-)

    20. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      If the asteroid belt had been closer to the Sun, there's a good chance it wouldn't be around for us to wish it wasn't around. Left to their own devices, these asteroids would have undergone accretion to form a planet. Instead, Jupiter's influence has ensured that the average velocity of collisions was high enough for planetesimal shattering to dominate over accretion, thus we have the asteroid belt. Interestingly, Jupiter and Mars have flung most of the original material out of the belt, leaving only an estimated 0.1% behind, about 4% of our Moon's mass, which is what we see today.

      Credit: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_belt#Formation

    21. Re:Good to see it doing it's job by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      Hhhmmmmm.... It would appear that you are correct. Please drop off some of the Red Bull and Cheetos with my mom. I will be busy studying in the basement for readmittance.

  7. Dang by rlp · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, I should cancel my plans to land on Europa?

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:Dang by mjwx · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, I should cancel my plans to land on Europa?

      All these worlds are yours, except Europa, attempt no landing there.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:Dang by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      So, I should cancel my plans to land on Europa?

      All these worlds are yours, except Europa, attempt no landing there.

      Until the sequel anyway. Then you can probably get away with it.

    3. Re:Dang by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Well what did they think we would do once they said we couldn't land there?

      Damn teases!

      Honestly had they said nothing we would have not gone looking around. It was a boring little place anyway. At least, it was until we decided someone was hiding something.

      In any event, I'm sure it won't end badly at all.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    4. Re:Dang by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Something also embedded into Uranus. Good luck with that ;-P

    5. Re:Dang by w0mprat · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, I should cancel my plans to land on Europa?

      All these worlds are yours, except Europa, attempt no landing there.

      In the real 2010 its more like:

      aLL THESE WORLD ARE BELONG TO YOU KK, DO NOT WANT EUROPA THX

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    6. Re:Dang by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      All these worlds are yours, except Europa, attempt no landing there.

      Do or do not. There is no 'attempt'.

    7. Re:Dang by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      In the real 2010 its more like:

      aLL THESE WORLD ARE BELONG TO YOU KK, DO NOT WANT EUROPA THX

      This is not the moon you're looking for. We can go about our business. Move along.

    8. Re:Dang by feyhunde · · Score: 1

      Use them Together, Use them in Peace.

      --
      I'd say more, but my guild is raiding.
    9. Re:Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There goes the Europaen vacation.

    10. Re:Dang by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      aLL THESE WORLD ARE BELONG TO YOU KK, DO NOT WANT EUROPA THX

      OK, let's see if I can get this through the lameness filter:

      +#353 ///0rldz 4r3 y00rz, xc3p+ 3|_|r0p4. 4++3mpt n0 p0wn4g3 n00bz rotflmao

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
    11. Re:Dang by raind · · Score: 1

      No please don't. We all would like you to make the trip.

      --
      Get up!
    12. Re:Dang by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like *that* is ever going to happen.

    13. Re:Dang by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      Scientists should rename Uranus to end that silly joke.

      I propose the new name should be Urectum.

    14. Re:Dang by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I propose the new name should be Urectum.

      Rectum? You damn near killed 'em.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Dang by Naatach · · Score: 1

      Something also embedded into Uranus. Good luck with that ;-P

      You, sir, owe me a new monitor and a cup of coffee.

      --
      There may be no "I" in team, but there's also no "F" in way.
    16. Re:Dang by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep your Europa-rail pass though, you might be able to use it later.

    17. Re:Dang by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      In the real 2010, it's more like:

      It's been forty years since the first moon landing, and we still haven't traveled beyond that distance. While we may have the capability in an abstract sense, we couldn't launch a manned mission to Europa right now even if we wanted to. Hell, we don't even have a craft capable of taking us back to the moon...

    18. Re:Dang by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      My daughter once got assigned Uranus in science class. I got upset at her for not fighting for a more "respectable" planet. "I bet you were dilly-dallying when people were picking planets, weren't you! Now you will be the butt of....I mean subject to jokes".

  8. Well that's why they're there... by s0litaire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Saturn and Jupiter are the sweepers of the Solar system. They are big, so things hit them instead of us. Think of them as bodyguards... ^_^

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:Well that's why they're there... by Vectronic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, till the day one of them changes the orbit of what would have been just something to observe in the sky, to something that knocks us clean out of our orbit.

    2. Re:Well that's why they're there... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      They are two pinpricks on a massive (nearly) 2D plane.
      How does that help protect the even smaller pinprick that is Earth in 3D space?

    3. Re:Well that's why they're there... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Jupiter and Saturn are (nearly) flat?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Well that's why they're there... by brusk · · Score: 1

      Well a lot of the stuff we worry about is roughly in the same disc as the planets, so it's not a perfect 2D space but it's closer to that than to a random distribution in 3D space.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    5. Re:Well that's why they're there... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      Compared to their orbits, and their orbits are on the same plane, more or less.

    6. Re:Well that's why they're there... by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      You don't have any idea what an elliptic plane is do you?

    7. Re:Well that's why they're there... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well a lot of the stuff we worry about is roughly in the same disc as the planet...

      True, but the size of their orbits makes it seem like playing foosball with two (weakly) magnetized needles for goalies and a bunch of iron fillings as the ball.

    8. Re:Well that's why they're there... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think the biggest deal is that Jupiter and Saturn have been at it so long that after a certain point, they took care of most everything that hadn't already hit us in the first billion or so years.

      Obviously, a lot of stuff rocked our world in the early days... like whatever gouged the moon out.

    9. Re:Well that's why they're there... by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Earth also orbits on the same plane and so by your own reasoning is "flat" when compared to it's orbit. What point are you trying to make by CHOOSING 2D geometry for the gas giants and 3D for Earth?

      The "protection" is related to the strength of the gravitational fields of the gas giants, gravitational fields are 3D and the Earth's field is several hundred times weaker than either of the gas giants.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:Well that's why they're there... by Poorcku · · Score: 1

      if they are our bodyguards, then i can call them Betty and they can call me Al.

      --
      I take my children to see Madonna(..), but I never for once ever thought I was in the same business.Chris Rea.
    11. Re:Well that's why they're there... by sznupi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Moon impact is in its own league, considering that the impactor was very large and came in very slow/probably from one of Lagrangian points of proto-Earth ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis )

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    12. Re:Well that's why they're there... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      kekekekeke! ^-^

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    13. Re:Well that's why they're there... by fyrewulff · · Score: 1

      Jupiter's PR firm was quoted that day as saying, quote, "whoops.jpg"

      --
      "We need to get over this notion, that, for Apple to win... Microsoft must lose." - Steve Jobs, 1997
    14. Re:Well that's why they're there... by CheshireCatCO · · Score: 1

      Except that that's not true. The notion was based originally on speculation by someone and that speculation turned into established "fact" somehow.

      Recent computer simulations (Grazier and Newman) show that in fact Jupiter takes more pot-shots at us than it protects us from. This isn't hard to believe, anything that enters its Hill Sphere is much more likely to scatter than to strike the planet.

    15. Re:Well that's why they're there... by nickruiz · · Score: 1

      Saturn and Jupiter are the sweepers of the Solar system. They are big, so things hit them instead of us. Think of them as bodyguards... ^_^

      I've nicknamed them Hans and Nitro.

    16. Re:Well that's why they're there... by cdombroski · · Score: 1

      Jupiter isn't going to be much help against the big rock that's aimed towards us from solar north...

    17. Re:Well that's why they're there... by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Either you really like Palin, or you're massively understating the importance of the giants.

    18. Re:Well that's why they're there... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 1

      No. Please enlighten me.

    19. Re:Well that's why they're there... by kjllmn · · Score: 1

      This 2D-plane that you refer to is the one in which the majority of the material in the solar system moves.

  9. I just hand an thought... by s0litaire · · Score: 5, Funny
    ...It's nearly 2010...

    and a dark spot is noticed on Jupiter...

    Now where did i put that monolith...

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
    1. Re:I just hand an thought... by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Check your lagrange points. I'm always leaving monoliths there. And defining blues-rock trios. Those always show up at my lagrange.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:I just hand an thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      xD

    3. Re:I just hand an thought... by murphyje · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'm in a public lab right now and exposing my LaGrange points might land me in jail. I'll try to check them when I get home.

  10. She just fell on the coffee table! by plasmacutter · · Score: 4, Funny

    "something may have hit jupiter" and left a black mark...but jupiter inisists she just fell eye-first on the coffee table!

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    1. Re:She just fell on the coffee table! by Darth_brooks · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Great, another planet that doesn't listen..."

      Can I use my frequent flier miles to upgrade the seat to hell that I just purchased?

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    2. Re:She just fell on the coffee table! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That coffee table doesn't happen to be covered with empty beer bottles, some containing cigarette butts, does it?

    3. Re:She just fell on the coffee table! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like my gas giants how I like my shrimp: battered.

  11. Yep, that's why God put em there by Weedhopper · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    To sweep up debris. He also made the universe appear 13.5 billion years old when upon creation 6000 years ago.

    Planets don't have a job. They aren't there to act as a debris sweep even if they do sweep debris.

    1. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by spankyofoz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, I could have worded it better. I'm not claiming intelligent design put Jupiter there, merely that Jupiter is doing what Jupiter does, and that this event is nothing out of the ordinary.

      Very cool that it was captured (by an Aussie)

      --

      - There is no point, it's like a sphere -
    2. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Lighten up dude. The guy made no religious reference. Please try to limit the display of your religious bigotry to times when someone actually makes a religious reference. Thank you.

    3. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by SEWilco · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I pay Jupiter to catch rocks, then he has a job.

    4. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Weedhopper · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Sorry, didn't mean to come across like a jackass.

    5. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There are a lot of people who believe in God as creator that don't believe in young earth/young universe.

    6. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by afabbro · · Score: 0, Redundant

      To sweep up debris. He also made the universe appear 13.5 billion years old when upon creation 6000 years ago.

      Planets don't have a job. They aren't there to act as a debris sweep even if they do sweep debris.

      Wow. You infer fundamentalism, creationism, and a whole lot of other things from just the rather mild comment that gas giants "are there to act as a magnet for comet/asteroids so they don't end up near us". I don't recall the GP saying that God created the Earth in 7 days, that he believes Bishop Usher's creationist timeline, or even that he believes in intelligent design, much less God.

      You think maybe, just maybe, he was speaking colloquially? Humorously? Not intending to make a profound statement but rather just shooting the breeze?

      How big exactly is that chip on your shoulder? You might want to wipe the foam off your mouth and have a beer or drop a tranq, because you're kind of on hair trigger overload.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    7. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      Hey, you know what? If that high horse you're on weren't so high, maybe you could see that apology that I wrote to the GP several minutes before you posted you counter diatribe.

      I had a knee jerk reaction and I was wrong and I admitted it. If you read the following replies, you'd have seen that. Instead, you'd rather tell me that I'm foaming at the mouth.

      Who's holds the moral high ground now? It ain't me, but it ain't you either.

    8. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, but in your rush to denigrate people who believe differently than yourself you did.

    9. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by pentalive · · Score: 1

      The title of the original post was "Good to see it doing it's job (Score:5, Interesting)"

      no religious reference there.

    10. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by pentalive · · Score: 4, Funny

      When was the last time Jupiter cashed one of his paychecks?

    11. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe, God did put it there and the universe is really 13.5 billions years old.
      Believing in God doesn't mean you believe that the earth is 6000 years old.

    12. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by ROMRIX · · Score: 1

      The title of the original post was "Good to see it doing it's job (Score:5, Interesting)"

      no religious reference there.

      Thanks Captain Obvious!

    13. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by finity · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have new hope for Slashdot and the Internet in general.

    14. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, I could have worded it better. I'm not claiming intelligent design put Jupiter there, merely that Jupiter is doing what Jupiter does, and that this event is nothing out of the ordinary.

      Yes, yes, gas giants *will* be gas giants, and all that...there's no such thing as a bad gas giant!

    15. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Very cool that it was captured (by an Aussie)

      Free the asteroid! Free the asteroid!

    16. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Meta: Now that we've all seen the guy apologise, press PgDn approximately five times (MS patent pending) to skip over the horde of twits that still won't give him a break. While his comment wasn't entirely in good form, it's understandable and he's apologised.

    17. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by wellingj · · Score: 1

      Makes me wonder how bad it is when you do try.

    18. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by bonch · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ, it was a fucking joke. And yes, my use of that phrase was intentional.

    19. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by devnulljapan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, but in your rush to denigrate people who believe differently than yourself you did.

      You mean like the jackasses who insist the universe is 6000 years old?

    20. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's been saving up for an anniversary ring to give Uranus.

    21. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but no. Although it is a little churlish, at this point, I'm fascinated by the continuing responses of the [i]righteously indignant.[/i]

      I especially like the ones that are lecturing me on religion, especially since my religious beliefs can be no more or less inferred from my comment than I could or should from the GP.

      There's some mod(s) out there +1ing ACs for one line comments, including the AC that is basically flipping my apology the bird.

      The score for the original comment is swinging up and down, so I'm guessing this is a polarizing issue, even though it was meant as a joke. Poor form, but a joke.

      So far, no death threats.

    22. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      I'm going to kill you you son of a bitch! I know where you live!

      *disclaimer* I havent read the original comment and am only responding to the lack of death threats... I wouldn't want you to feel so unhated :)

    23. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He was denigrating a notion, not a group of people. The fact that there exist some people who take criticism of their worldview as a personal attack is a matter for those particular people to come to terms with.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    24. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time Jupiter cashed one of his paychecks?

      It all goes to his pension fund. He will cash it out when he retires ie. when he turns into a sun.

    25. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by fireheadca · · Score: 1

      Yes, but in your rush to denigrate people who believe differently than yourself you did.

      You mean like the jackasses who insist the universe is 6000 years old?

      Maybe they have a different concept of year? Just like 40 days and 40 nights is not a literal 40 days - it just means a very long time.

    26. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by drinkypoo · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yes, but in your rush to denigrate people who believe differently than yourself you did.

      Certain ideas are ridiculous, and SHOULD be attacked, so that we can realize that they are ridiculous and move on with life. As it is, it was a mildly funny joke and should not have attracted passing comment. Nobody should care when an AC with bad grammar calls them out.

      I think it's clear at this point that the earth wasn't made in a week, and religious fundamentalists are trouble.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    27. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by nickruiz · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      [quote]When was the last time Jupiter cashed one of his paychecks?[/quote]

      Just like how China is waiting for the opportune time to cash in on USA's debt, Jupiter's waiting for the opportune time to enslave us.

    28. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by cwiegmann24 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I think it's clear at this point that the earth wasn't made in a week, and religious fundamentalists are trouble.

      Just like the earth isn't round and the sun isn't the center of the solar system, right?

      Certain ideas may seem ridiculous, until you take the time to really look at them objectively.

    29. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got it - it means people on big boats can't count, right? So they just freaking make something up? I think it was supposed to be 42, but that darn ark captain passed out drunk a couple of nights and missed counting them. Good thing the rain was warm and there were no icebergs or he might have had an animal spill.

      Honestly - it someone tells me 40 days, I expect 40 days. If they say, "I'm not sure, it was something like a month or more" - then I'll agree they meant a long time. If my vacation home is available to me for 7 days and 6 nights - that better not just mean "a short time" - it better mean 6 nights.

    30. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Ideas are beautiful, fragile things.
       
      Attack people, not ideas.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    31. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Must be one of those jobs saved or created that Obama claims in the stimulus package.

    32. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Yeah, but maybe if they keep hassling you, they'll eventually make you regret apologising and get you to behave in a way that they can be indignant about again. Because they love being indignant about something.

      (Note: "They" does not refer to religious people. It refers to people that love to be indignant, examples of which can be found in most demographics).

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    33. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I could have worded it better. I'm not claiming intelligent design put Jupiter there, merely that Jupiter is doing what Jupiter does, and that this event is nothing out of the ordinary.

      Well if you take the reverse view, it doesn't require ID.

      We are here simply because Jupiter happen to be there.

      Had Jupiter not been there, then no complex life would have evolved on earth in the first place simply because it would be hit a great deal more by very large objects.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    34. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by devnulljapan · · Score: 1

      Maybe they have a different concept of year? Just like 40 days and 40 nights is not a literal 40 days - it just means a very long time.

      Yes, and maybe wibble. And maybe the moon is made of cheese, but "cheese" really means "rock". And up is down and black is white and left is right...depending.
      All the jackasses who believe that I've ever seen/heard/been unfortunate enough to meet define "year" as "year", as in 365 of your earth days. (Where "day" is 24 hours, where hour is "60 minutes" where "minute" is "60 seconds" where...etc. all the way down along with the turtles).
      Biblical literalists are not subtle enough to do what you're suggesting. And even if they were, what's the point of saying "year" when you mean "100 million years" the narguing the toss about it?
      Just to be bloody minded?

       

    35. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      If cashing checks was a prerequisite to accepting a contract, then we wouldn't have Guantanamo Bay! If Jupiter is failing to cash its checks, it's clearly an indication that it finds personal satisfaction of a job well done to be sufficient compensation. Just like the satisfaction Cuba gets from knowing it's made a difference in the Global War on Terror.

    36. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Bungie · · Score: 1

      He also made the universe appear 13.5 billion years old when upon creation 6000 years ago

      It's pretty easy to have such a large gap in dates when ancient peoples had no clue what the heck numbers in the billions range were or how to express them. I don't even think Roman Numerals have a symbol for billions, how the heck could ancient peoples possibly know what number to write?

      --
      The clash of honour calls, to stand when others fall.
    37. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Difficult to cash a check when paid under the table. I'm pretty sure he's an illegal, but he works so well I don't want to fire him. He's a jovial fellow to boot.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    38. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "What are you, some kind of moron?"

      Honestly, this is the only way to treat ID'ers, and anyone who defends them, as you've done. It's not being open minded; it's being jelly-brained.

      They are idiots, and you sir, are an idiot.

      Mod me up.

    39. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by mkarcher · · Score: 1

      When was the last time Jupiter cashed one of his paychecks?

      Sixty-five million years ago.

      --

      These opinions are my own and not necessarily
      the opinions of God or any other supreme being.
    40. Re:Yep, that's why God put em there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, God never specified a reference frame. And there's certainly nothing about taking Moses aside for fifty years to teach him quantum physics, so what we've got is a poetic explanation meant for a wandering Hebrew in the year 2000 BC.

      Taking it to mean seven literal days is, on the whole, a bit of a strawman. Yes, there are some fools *cough*AnswersInGenesis*cough* loudly trumpeting it, but their opinions should not be mistaken for those of Christianity as a whole.

  12. I hope it had collision insurance! by techmuse · · Score: 1

    You know, the cost of repairing or replacing the Jovian atmosphere is really high. I hope the planet had a good insurance policy...

    1. Re:I hope it had collision insurance! by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Well we can't claim it on insurance because the interplanetary authorities will know we wasted our air.

      I have a backup plan.

      We are just going to send a ship to suck the air out of another planet. Just have to get the planetary shield codes first.

      May the schwartz be with you.

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:I hope it had collision insurance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The air is only expensive because it's so happy.

  13. Fuck you Jupiter! by deglr6328 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I found a new dark spot on my pole last week and you don't see me running to the science press about it! media whore!

    --
    - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    1. Re:Fuck you Jupiter! by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      When your pole has the same gravitational magnitude of Jupiter, then you can have attention from the media.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    2. Re:Fuck you Jupiter! by TheDugong · · Score: 1

      That is because everyone would know you are talking out of uranus.

    3. Re:Fuck you Jupiter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be running to a doctor, though.

  14. Jupiter is good for this kind of thing. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 0, Redundant

    cleaning up the solar system of random rocky debris. good job!

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  15. Jupitian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jupitian says: Get off my lawn asteroid !

  16. No, not the first by davidwr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Jupiter's been impacted many many times before.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:No, not the first by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Thinking back to GCSE Science, but isn't Jupiter a gas-giant? How do you impact a gas?

      Do aeroplanes "impact" clouds?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:No, not the first by Sique · · Score: 1

      Yes, they do. And there are very specific types of shock waves running through clouds and other types of shockwaves running through gas giants.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:No, not the first by c0p0n · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pretty sure you mean "Uranus".

      --

      Your head a splode
    4. Re:No, not the first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like impacting "Uranus"

    5. Re:No, not the first by crontabminusell · · Score: 1

      Jupiter average density: 1.326 g/cm3
      Water maximum density: 1.000 g/cm3 (or more commonly 1000 kg/m3)

      So Jupiter is, on average, more dense than water on our planet. Though I understand that it's most likely not nearly that dense at the fringes of the atmosphere than it is on the interior, I honestly have no idea how they measure the volume of Jupiter when they make that calculation (like, are they measuring the visible parts of Jupiter that we're all familiar with, or are they measuring beyond that into some field that most of us *aren't* familiar with?)

    6. Re:No, not the first by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Volume can roughly be measured as 4/3(pi)r^3

      The mass is trickier. You have to measure it by checking the planet's gravitational pull. The gravitational attraction between a satellite and Jupiter is G times Jupiter's mass times the satellite's mass, divided by the distance between Jupiter and the satellite, squared. Since we know the weight of a satellite, and we know the distance between the satellite and Jupiter, we can gauge the mass of the planet. We can check our maths by rotating the equatioin and checking Jupiter's mass against the sun (where Jupiter would be calculated in place of the satellite).

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    7. Re:No, not the first by armareum · · Score: 1

      I think he means: "What is the radius of the planet, given that it is a gas planet? How do you determine the 'surface' of a gas planet?"

      --
      Is this a rhetorical question?
    8. Re:No, not the first by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Still doesn't seem to be an issue. It may be a gas giant, but it still has a very sharp horizon.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
  17. In related news... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 0, Redundant
    As the small dark spots on Jupiter continue to grow in number and size, a repeating radio message is now being received from the vicinity of this, solar system's largest, planet:

    ALL THESE WORLDS ARE YOURS EXCEPT EUROPA. ATTEMPT NO LANDINGS THERE.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  18. Who will be the first? by erroneus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who will be the first to register "Jupiter-aid.com" to collect donations for the stricken Jupiterians?

    1. Re:Who will be the first? by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      There's no way for Jupiterians to affect us and that's final!

    2. Re:Who will be the first? by Rhuragh · · Score: 2

      Hey, you jerk! I'm from Jupiter, and the proper demonym is "Jovian," you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Who will be the first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find the proper term is "Jovians"

  19. Hubble! by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope they can get the Hubble scope on it fast, without bureaucratic or technical hurdles.

    1. Re:Hubble! by Tsaot · · Score: 1

      I hope they can get the Hubble scope on it fast, without bureaucratic or technical hurdles.

      Isn't Jupiter too close for the Hubble? It's a deep space telescope and Jupiter hardly counts.

    2. Re:Hubble! by Spikeles · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it's still having issues

      --
      I don't need to test my programs.. I have an error correcting modem.
    3. Re:Hubble! by Tsaot · · Score: 1

      Nevermind on that, I just googled it and found images of jupiter taken by the Hubble. Now to hunt down that science teacher that said the blasted thing couldn't see anything within our solar system.

    4. Re:Hubble! by rcw-home · · Score: 4, Informative

      Isn't Jupiter too close for the Hubble? It's a deep space telescope and Jupiter hardly counts.

      Just like my point-and-shoot camera doesn't care whether something is 100 feet away or several miles away when I manually set it to infinite focus, the Hubble Space Telescope doesn't care whether something is a light second or several billion light years away. It has imaged every planet in the solar system except Mercury (including Earth), has imaged the moon, and once indirectly imaged the sun.

    5. Re:Hubble! by dotgain · · Score: 2, Funny

      Issues!? Seems to me it's got an entire subscription

    6. Re:Hubble! by gaspyy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Just to be pedantic, point-and-shoot cameras (aka focus-free, including the ones in cell phones) are not focused to infinity but rather to the hyperfocal distance

    7. Re:Hubble! by dotgain · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And to continue the pedantry, from the article you linked: (emphasis mine)

      Definition 2: The hyperfocal distance is the distance beyond which all objects are acceptably sharp, for a lens focused at infinity.

      Fun, isn't it?

    8. Re:Hubble! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Point-and-Shoot does not imply fix-focus. It does essentially apply that you only have to press a single button to get an image, i.e. automatic exposure and an autofocus.

    9. Re:Hubble! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Point-and-Shoot cameras often make a medium-focus compromise and use a small aperture to reduce any focus error that may occur (at the increase risk of motion blur due to longer exposures), or special auto-guess-focus software. That's different than Hubble. Jupiter is still so far away that it does not require a different focus than what is used on deep space. For all intents and purposes, it still uses "infinity" focus for Jupiter. Any error from being nearer is much smaller than the resolution limit of Hubble.
         

  20. My god, is full of... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    monoliths... Wasn't that supposed to happen next year?

  21. Received transmission: by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    All these planets are yours
    except Europa
    Attempt no landi- hang on, what the fu#$(@*$&
    NO CARRIER

  22. The gods are slugging it out by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    The gods are fighting each other again. My money is on the God of Heaven and Earth, Jupiter. He'll win as usual and be none the worse for wear.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  23. Jupiter is the king! by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our (318 times as massive as our planet) planetary overlord.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  24. Shit by The+Bungi · · Score: 1

    If we missed something that big about to hit Jupiter what else are we missing? I hope to hell that's not an impact feature.

    And where the hell is Bruce Willis??

    1. Re:Shit by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If we missed something that big about to hit Jupiter what else are we missing? I hope to hell that's not an impact feature.

      Don't worry, I'm sure somebody is keeping an ey~' % 3 ;+ ' ` { . $ [NO CARRIER]
           

  25. How to solve it by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

    The math is actually pretty simple to figure this all out.

    Given: About 12 weeks ago, Balmer finds out that Netbooks are shipping with Linux.

    How much did kinetic energy did the chair possess...

    1. Re:How to solve it by icannotthinkofaname · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it had enough KE.

      --
      Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.
    2. Re:How to solve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We need details to run the numbers. Things like the mass of the chair and how many Red Bulls Balmer had consumed in the last hour.

    3. Re:How to solve it by ebonum · · Score: 1

      How do I mod you beyond 5?!?!?!?!

      I have tears in my eyes.

  26. A large dark spot forms on Jupiter... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  27. Gasp! You've solved our mission to Mars problem! by Tsaot · · Score: 3, Funny

    All we have to do is put an astronaut in a chair near Ballmer and then tell him Google just hired Gates!

  28. O)bligatory Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obligatory Post: Wow, I bet you're all glad it wasn't Uranus!

    Sorry, but, it had to be said. This *is* Slashdot, after all. This post frees others to create fart jokes, and so, benefits everyone, especially the high UID posters.

  29. new site jupiter.samba.org by tridge · · Score: 5, Informative

    Anthony's webserver has been slashdotted, but
    he has copied the files to:

        http://jupiter.samba.org/

    He is now trying to login to his server so he
    can redirect the pages to the above site.

    As well as being an amateur astronomer, Anthony
    is a keen Linux enthusiast. His home built
    telescope is controlled by his Linux box.

    Cheers, Tridge

    1. Re:new site jupiter.samba.org by plover · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As well as being an amateur astronomer, Anthony is a keen Linux enthusiast. His home built telescope is controlled by his Linux box.

      But not tonight, I bet it's not controlling a damn thing.

      --
      John
    2. Re:new site jupiter.samba.org by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      He is now trying to login to his server so he can redirect the pages to the above site.

      As well as being an amateur astronomer, Anthony is a keen Linux enthusiast. His home built telescope is controlled by his Linux box.

      Well, I hope the website isn't run on the box that runs his telescope... or else it may mean the first time Slashdot has directly interfered with astronomy!

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

  30. Just doing it's job by confused+one · · Score: 1

    policing the solar system, protecting the innocent inner planets from the evil attacking hordes.

  31. Crash landing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least it didn't end up in the Hudson

  32. Black Spots on Jupiter? by Penguinshit · · Score: 1, Funny

    There goes the neighborhood!

  33. It was probably the Oscar Mayer Wienermobile. by HouseOfMisterE · · Score: 1

    That thing really gets around!

  34. Punchline forming... by rolando2424 · · Score: 1

    *insert your own Yo Momma joke here*

    --
    Okay seriously I've just run out of pointless things to say.
    1. Re:Punchline forming... by Tarlus · · Score: 1

      *Inserts joke about my mother* ...wait, what?

      --
      /* No Comment */
    2. Re:Punchline forming... by slider2800 · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what SHE said!

      --
      return $sig;
  35. please use new URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Can the slashdot admins please move the link in the story to the new site? I can't even log into my box to put the redirect in place...

    http://jupiter.samba.org/

    Thanks again Tridge, you're a lifesaver

    Anthony

    1. Re:please use new URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:please use new URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi Anthony. Must check out your site after the noise dies down as I am contemplating getting a lunar and planetary imager to use on my Celestron CPC800 to get some practice in before I move onto having a go at DSO on an EQ5 with a WO Megrez 72 + guide scope. Thing is, the image you have taken is magnificent but I cant believe its only 648x488 pixels as for one thing the image is 500*540. Do you have any information on your site about your image generation train? I'm trying to figure out whether I need more pixels than 640*480. What do you think of the DMK 41AF02.AS 1280 x 960, is it worth the extra money over the smaller versions?

  36. Re:Super Comet Fragment Impact Very Large Explosio by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's all sing another round of Super Comet Fragment Impact Extra-Large Explosions by Kare and Higgins.

    Let's not.

  37. I SWEAR... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    I DIDN'T DO IT!!!

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  38. Who holds the moral high ground? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Me. AC.

    Never saw that comin', huh?

  39. OMFG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A second asteroid just flew into the north pole!!!!

  40. pak chooie unf by plover · · Score: 1

    I am the sweeper planet. I am here to protect you from the terrible secret of space.

    I am the pusher planet. DO NOT TRUST THE SWEEPER PLANET. Sweeping will not protect you from the terrible secret of space. Pushing will protect you from the terrible secret of space.

    --
    John
    1. Re:pak chooie unf by Quirkz · · Score: 1
      Is "pak chooie unf" supposed to be one of the lines in that song? If so, I think I know the line you're talking about, and I always thought it was "actually us" with a pause in the middle of actually because of the robot voice. One of us has a very vivid imagination.

      I also thought that the pusher robot wanted to shove, and the shover robot wanted to push, but I'm too lazy to verify.

    2. Re:pak chooie unf by plover · · Score: 1

      Pak chooie unf was spelled out in the video. It's non-English nonsense, as opposed to the whole song which is bog standard nonsense.

      --
      John
  41. Something May Have Just Hit Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Eeriest Slashdot story title of the year?

    1. Re:Something May Have Just Hit Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anbody considered a study of how Gas Giant Impacts, and Imagery there of, Inversely influences the relevance of associated internet commentary by the Hoi Polloi?

    2. Re:Something May Have Just Hit Jupiter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [...] the Hoi Polloi?

      Is that anything like "the La Brea tar pits" or the "Rio Grande river"?

  42. OMG! Shooting planets out of the sky? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where's the safest place to take cover?

    Oh, wait. This is probably one time boot camp training will come in handy.

    1. Sit down.
    2. Place your head between your knees.
    3. Kiss your ass "good-bye".

    I don't know - that still sounds kinda disgusting - maybe I'll read and think a bit before I do that. Oh. That's right. ALL THE PLANETS have been hit repeatedly. There probably isn't a year that goes by without one being hit. This hit's maybe the biggest ever recorded, but nothing new. Lotsa hits happened before mankind was around to record them.

    Phhht.

    More non-news. Maybe I'll just catch the re-runs next year.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    1. Re:OMG! Shooting planets out of the sky? by Memroid · · Score: 1

      1. Sit down.
      2. Place your head between your knees.
      3. Kiss your ass "good-bye".

      4. ???
      5. ...PROFIT!!!

    2. Re:OMG! Shooting planets out of the sky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have read somewhere that the earth gains a few tons of matter per day from meteors (mostly water).

    3. Re:OMG! Shooting planets out of the sky? by jnnnnn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, given that the planets were FORMED from colliding objects, it's not really surprising that collisions are still happening.

    4. Re:OMG! Shooting planets out of the sky? by instagib · · Score: 1

      Profit for whom? Chiropractors?

    5. Re:OMG! Shooting planets out of the sky? by instagib · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, meteorism increases greenhouse gases.

  43. Jupiter is a Gas Giant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nonsense, nothing can hit Jupiter. It is a gas giant. It probably slowed down while passing thru that massive gas layers and halted at the core because of the gravity.

    1. Re:Jupiter is a Gas Giant by radon28 · · Score: 1

      How is your explanation any different from what the article postulated?

    2. Re:Jupiter is a Gas Giant by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Nonsense, nothing can hit Jupiter. It is a gas giant. It probably slowed down while passing thru that massive gas layers and halted at the core because of the gravity.

      At a few kilometers per second, you won't feel the difference between hitting a solid and hitting a gas.

    3. Re:Jupiter is a Gas Giant by argent · · Score: 1

      You mean, apart from "It probably slowed down while passing thru that massive gas layers and halted at the core because of the gravity." involving such a fundamental misunderstanding of physics that I despair for the public school system?

    4. Re:Jupiter is a Gas Giant by agw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nonsense, nothing can hit Jupiter. It is a gas giant. It probably slowed down while passing thru that massive gas layers and halted at the core because of the gravity.

      At a few kilometers per second, you won't feel the difference between hitting a solid and hitting a gas.

      That would depend on the pressure in the atmosphere.
      If something enters the atmosphere it will burst as soon as the pressure is too high.
      That will definately happen on Jupiter, but also happens on Venus or even Earth. Early probes to Venus were crushed even before the impact and Venus is a rocky planet.

      It's unlikely that anything will "hit" the core of Jupiter, as only the first layer and the clouds are really gas. Below it, the pressure is so great the gas becomes like a liquid.

      Jupiter's layers are actually quite interesting and become really awesome when realizing the size of them.

  44. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It parses far too easily as a joke on spousal abuse.

    Does it parse any other way!?
    Well, I guess it could be parsed as planetary lesbian domestic partner abuse, if you really want to be PC.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  45. Nice example for FOSS by plopez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Astronomy is a good example for FOSS. A lot of near Earth low energy astronomy gets done by amateurs in the best sense of the word, those who have a passion for the topic but don't get paid to do it.

    The same for other areas such as birding and botany. Often volunteers discover or rediscover rare species and then the pros can come back in and do more in depth studies.

    Anywho. Nice job. What ever it turns out to be.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Nice example for FOSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit like geology....
      You find a nice rock.
      You take it to the geologist and he tells you how it got there.
      And then tries to talk you into leaving it in his collection.

    2. Re:Nice example for FOSS by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The "free" part I'll give you, but "open source" or "software"? I mean, I can see why it's in the same spirit as FOSS, but FOSS isn't a synonym for human cooperation just yet.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  46. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by Draek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So? here at Slashdot we make jokes of murderers, pedophiles, recently deceased people, people with disabilities, etc. And if we don't care about *those*, I don't see why we'd care about simple domestic abuse.

    Plus, it provides some much-needed relief from the endless 2010 allusions being posted here.

    --
    No problem is insoluble in all conceivable circumstances.
  47. Is it the Hydrogues? by RazzleDazzle · · Score: 1

    And should we be worried?

    --
    ZERO ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ZERO ONE ONE! Just brushing up for my next big invention: Ethernet over Voice (EoV)
    1. Re:Is it the Hydrogues? by yahwotqa · · Score: 1

      Not to worry, the Earth should have enough verdani (and somewhat polluted wentals) on board, plus we can always call faeros from the Sun, if needed. :)

  48. No... by jfbilodeau · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Urectum.

    --
    Goodbye Slashdot. You've changed.
    1. Re:No... by Themer · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Wrecked 'em? Damn near killed 'em!

  49. No religious reference? by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

    Are you kidding? This story and the whole concept of Jupiter as a celestial body is heretical and an attack on traditional values.

    --
    Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
  50. Jupiter being naughty again? by ldpercy · · Score: 4, Funny
  51. It's a battlefield player by beerbear · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    --
    Hold my beer and watch this!
  52. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by ZeroExistenZ · · Score: 1

    ... or at least "Uncool." It parses far too easily as a joke on spousal abuse.

    Sounds like that hit close to home...

    --
    I think we can keep recursing like this until someone returns 1
  53. jupter + uranus = ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jupiter + Uranus = ?
    - that kinda would explain black spots on the pole.... /F

  54. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh hey guys, i'm new here, just came from Digg

    Quite simply, i find the postings on here incredibly terrible and a disgrace that such people are being moderated as funny when making jokes about domestic abuse! Please mod him down!

    Yeah.. we'll get right on that champ.
    You must be very new here, right?

  55. south pole by mathfeel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Took me a few second to realized why the south pole is on top of the image. The guy is in Australia.

    --
    The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
  56. Re:Super Comet Fragment Impact Very Large Explosio by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

    haha dammit, that's going to be stuck in my head all day now!

    --
    "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  57. Google Failbot by argent · · Score: 1

    Apparently Google's Usenet search has been caponised again. If you keep following the links you end up looking at...

    Your search - "Super Comet Fragment Impact, Extra Large Explosions" - did not match any documents.
    Suggestions:

            * Make sure all words are spelled correctly.
            * Try different keywords.
            * Try more general keywords.
            * Try your query on: Web Search

  58. DANG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This needs to be modded +1 Stairs.

  59. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Trying to explain to stupid people that humor is a release valve is, well, much like trying to explain anything to stupid people. Just let them go back to their job at McDonald's ("But I'm a manager! It's not like I work on the line!") and don't try too hard to bring them around to your way of thinking. They're not capable of it.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  60. upside down? by simplerThanPossible · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Why is the "south polar region" on the top? Is that an astronomer thing?

    1. Re:upside down? by BrightSpark · · Score: 1

      Sex, sex, sex. That's all they think about! M.P.

    2. Re:upside down? by bossanovalithium · · Score: 1

      It's the way the reflecting mirror images the object I believe. The timing for this is spectacular, if it does start to grow, we are kinda stuffed.

  61. impact confirmed from JPL by cadience · · Score: 1

    "Glenn Orton from JPL has imaged this site using the NASA Infrared Telescope on Hawaii and confirms that it is an impact site and not a localised weather event."--from the linked website.

  62. Me. I hit Jupiter... by Yeff · · Score: 1

    And I was clearly provoked.

    --
    "Freedom Through Vigilance"
  63. maybe Jupiter is being studied. by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

    Did you find an ejection point or just an entrance point?

    --
    They're using their grammar skills there.
  64. If you look at old pics of Jupiter... by dm513 · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you look and compare some old pics of Jupiter and the current one showing the recent "impact"...You will notice there has been a darkened spot there before...

  65. Pointless Anime Joke by jameskojiro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Tuxedo Kamen is quoted as saying: "Bitch better have my supper ready or I will have to divorce the bitch like I did with that klutzy meatball head."

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  66. It wasn't me. Really! by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    I like Jupiter now. I really do. We're buds! Pal around all the time, we do. Heh, heh. Yup, good ole Joopy, you know. That's what his friends call him. Heh, heh. Heh, Heh.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  67. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by yurtinus · · Score: 1

    No no no, you don't understand. If we can't be offended for somebody else's sake, then how will anybody know that we *really* care?!

    --
    +1 Disagree
  68. Ringworld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How close are we?

  69. Yeah by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I searched articles in that group for that day and it's been deleted.

    It wouldn't surprise me if it got swept out in an automated song-lyric purge. Copyrights, you know. The irony is my posting here in 2004 got the explicit after-the-fact blessing from Higgins. See http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=114837&cid=9760539, http://slashdot.org/~beamjockey/journal/61635, and http://beamjockey.livejournal.com/.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  70. Something may NOT have!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extremely surprised at this rash posting on Slashdot. While some posts languish for weeks waiting for approval, such half baked and unconfirmed items do manage to make it almost instantaneously.

  71. Asteroid confirmed by mhaskell · · Score: 1

    Several sky watchers have been following a
    very dark asteroid for the last few months
    before it disappeared behind Jupiter. It
    apparently was measured to be about
    1x4x9 meters in shape.

  72. Check your assumptions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The black spot is not necessarily caused by something entering the Jovian atmosphere. It could also have been caused by something leaving the atmosphere that is now well on it's way to Earth.

  73. OH NOES!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's planet-X coming to get us in 2012!! BE WARNED!!!

  74. For those who don't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious

  75. Natural Selection by PleaseFearMe · · Score: 1

    You might not be wrong. If Jupiter wasn't there, a comet may have hit earth and broke it before we came to it. It's like natural selection. The earths out there, that don't have their Jupiter sweeping the trash, might not have the chance to have us humans, that think that Jupiter sweeps the trash. If this is the case, then Jupiter does indeed have a role of sweeping trash, or it would not be recognized. Not as stable, but still interesting.

  76. Paging CleverNickName by silverspell · · Score: 1
    You know what we should call this thing, right?

    The blog of Anthony Wesley, an Australian amateur astronomer, has what may be the first photos of a recent comet or asteroid impact on Jupiter, near the south pole.

    July 2009 Jupiter impact, I dub thee...the Wesley Crusher.

  77. My favorite headline so far.. by niktemadur · · Score: 1
    --
    Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  78. Old photo jupiter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm see this photo http://jupiter.samba.org/jupiter-impact.html .I not have old photo to compare this photo

  79. NASA has verified this event... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/news/news.cfm?release=2009-112

  80. Re:Gasp! You've solved our mission to Mars problem by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    All we have to do is put an astronaut in a chair near Ballmer and then tell him Google just hired Gates!

    We're not ready for interstellar flight.

  81. Re:This should be modded "Troll" ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a murdering retarded pedophile who recently died, you insensitive clod.

  82. Might Betelgeuse Go BOOM? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.rense.com/general86/boom.htm
    Might Betelgeuse Go BOOM?
    By Karl Schwarz
    7-19-9
    This essay is regarding a 'what if' scenario that could have a major impact on our planet and life on it. There is nothing to be alarmed about because there is absolutely nothing we can do about it. All the wailing and whining in the world would add up to exactly zero. In a way, this is about the sheer impotence of our species when compared to the bigger picture of things regarding this Universe and the realities of awesome powers therein.
    One thing people might need to do is put grain, fruit and vegetable seeds in a safe place just like the elitist group is doing that includes Bill Gates, Monsanto, Rockefeller and others. That should also include seeds for trees, flowers, anything green from far and wide and should include soil too. The reason for stockpiling fertile soil is explained towards the end of this essay.
    Those who do not have a survivalist mentality or survivalist skills might want to hone up on those.
    If you are unaware of the Svalbard Global Seed Vault, these links can fill you in:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Svalbard_Global_Seed_Vault
    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7529
    I have been curious for several years as to why some elitist like Monsanto, Bill Gates and Rockefeller felt that such a seed vault would be necessary. Sort of, have they run out of things to spend their money on? Cannot stoop to house and feed the homeless and poor, so collect seeds?
    So, I turned on the radar and have been watching for over 3 years for any clue, any hint as to why these elitists were suddenly so interested in seeds and a Doomsday Vault in the Arctic.
    Regardless of what some seem to think, we did not create any of this Universe nor do we run it or own it. Our species never has and never will. We do not do a very good job of managing this planet. I have yet to see anyone or any government on this planet that is even remotely worthy of being the ruler of this planet and that includes my homeland of the United States. We all pale in comparison to the majesty and the sheer power that the Universe demonstrates every day.
    I am reminded of a verse in II Corinthians 12:9: 9But he said to me, "My grace is sufficient for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness."
    The Universe works; our planet is for the most part a disaster and does not work. I have come to think that most of mankind is suffering from some sort of collective dementia and are totally disconnected from the continuum. Even in the face of hard facts and truth, we as a species have honed the art of cognitive dissonance and detachment from realities. That will not save us or make any problem go away.
    Mankind might be very close to getting slapped into reality or worse.
    So, YES, there is a very high probably that something is about to happen in the near to medium future. It may be in 1 week, 1 year, 5-10 years or 25 years from now. All we can do is bear witness to it and deal with it when that day arrives. if any of us are still alive to deal with it.
    There is something on the radar that could threaten Earth and life on it. It may well be headed at us even as you read this and could be devastating to life on our planet.
    We may soon have to prove that we are smarter than the dinosaurs and can avoid mass extinction. The phenomenon of mass extinction on this planet has happened many times before. We may be next on the list to face that reality.
    Enjoy.
    *****
    I for one am sitting on the edge of my chair waiting for Barky Obama to utter his next hollow, shallow Messianic syllables about how he alone is going to save Earth from Mr. Betelgeuse with another Bail Out or slick trick. Maybe Tiny Tim (God Bless each and every Insider) Geithner and Helicopter Ben Bernanke can dream up a quick bribe to see if Mr. Betelgeuse will go away and not hit Earth with a planet-killing Weapon of Mass Destruction.
    No, I am not referring to the funny but bizarre movie starring Michael Keaton, Alec Baldwin, Gina D