Slashdot Mirror


What the DHS Knows About You

Sherri Davidoff writes "Here's a real copy of an American citizen's DHS Travel Record, retrieved from the US Customs and Border Patrol's Automated Targeting System and obtained through a FOIA/Privacy Act request. The document reveals that the DHS is storing: the traveler's credit card number and expiration; IP addresses used to make Web travel reservations; hotel information and itinerary; full airline itinerary including flight numbers and seat numbers; phone numbers including business, home, and cell; and every frequent flyer and hotel number associated with the traveler, even ones not used for the specific reservation."

402 comments

  1. What??? by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

    What?? No shoe size? What's the point of taking off your shoes at the checkpoint then?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:What??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just like smelling them.

    2. Re:What??? by teh+kurisu · · Score: 0
    3. Re:What??? by cavehobbit · · Score: 1

      Just remember to pay cash when traveling to the E.U. and other places where prostitution is legal or Janet Napolitano will know how you like to get your kink on.

      Sooo, you like school-girl outfits and peanut butter? What, no marshmallows?

    4. Re:What??? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Canadians no longer have to remove their shoes at airport security--except when traveling to the US--according to guidelines obtained by Canadian media.

      Apparently, aside from slowing down security clearances, it was spreading foot-borne diseases. And here I thought the world would collapse from an unsanitised telephone.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:What??? by AmigaMMC · · Score: 1
      In Italy I never have to remove my shoes, but I feel security there is more thorough than in the U.S.

      Every time I pass through security they entirely check my camera equipment, asked me to turn cameras on, remove lens caps on both sides and they look into it, etc. In the States I was able to walk twice through with a Nalgene bottle filled with water. I actually saw a man complaining about not being able to take his bottle of water in LAX and the security officer offered a manual inspection (both people belong to the same race which I won't state because I'm going to pretend that didn't have anything to do with it). Other people were refused the same treatment.

    6. Re:What??? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      What?? No shoe size?

      What would you need shoes for in custody? No shoes ; no shoe size.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Reminds me... by matt4077 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This reminds me of the current idea to charge a 10$ entrance fee for foreign visitors. The money is supposed to go into a marketing fund. It's not only borderline schizophrenic to raise a new barrier in order to promote it, it might be even more sinister: that fee can apparently only be paid by credit card. Since 10$ doesn't seem to be enough money to be worth collecting, I'm wondering if getting all the credit card data isn't the real goal.

    Or maybe the US wants to finally catch up with the third world in unfriendliness.

    1. Re:Reminds me... by Cow+Jones · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I liked travelling to the US better when all I had to do was check the correct boxes on the amusing green form:

      [x] I am not a terrorist
      [x] I am not planning a child abduction in the US

      --

      Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
    2. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now now, you're forgetting the most diffcult one "[x] I have not committed genocide"

    3. Re:Reminds me... by Timex · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What if you don't HAVE a credit card? What THEN? "Sorry, we can't let you enter the country without a credit card."

      If the sole purpose is to fund advertising (as you say they claim), then cash should be an acceptable form of payment. If it is really a ruse to get a credit card number, then one shouldn't have to pay it if one doesn't have one. I, for one, refuse to get into a drawn-out discussion with Border Patrol about my financial decisions.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    4. Re:Reminds me... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Well just so you know, I live in Belgium and if I want to get my paperwork to travel to the US I have to CALL the US embassy (I cannot just go there, no sir, we're all terrorist here in Europe, you see) and without so much as getting a human operator to respond, like to - I don't know, ask me what the hell I want - I just have to hand over my CC number so I can be charged xx dollars, just to get them to make an appointment.

      I find that very disturbing, off putting and blatantly rude... It is not because the US can do that that it bloody should. I do not want to go to the US but sometimes the circumstances force me to, but when I do I am treated like a piece of s**t with no rights... It really makes me want to go through all the hassle of getting my visa, then canceling my card and getting a new one.

    5. Re:Reminds me... by xaxa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I liked travelling to the US better when all I had to do was check the correct boxes on the amusing green form:

      [x] I am not a terrorist
      [x] I am not planning a child abduction in the US

      I visited the US before 9/11:

      [x] I am not a communist

    6. Re:Reminds me... by easyTree · · Score: 1, Troll

      That only seems appropriate if the leaders of your country could tick the same boxes truthfully.

    7. Re:Reminds me... by nimbius · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so we need to revise a few docs to say "bring me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses with cash, check, or money order for $10 us..."

      --
      Good people go to bed earlier.
    8. Re:Reminds me... by palegray.net · · Score: 4, Insightful

      then canceling my card and getting a new one

      Assuming U.S. authorities are using your credit card information to track behavioral patterns, that won't help you much if the card is issued by the same bank. Even banks in Switzerland are routinely turning over information on account holders these days.

    9. Re:Reminds me... by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 0, Troll

      I'll bite and play devils advocate here for a minute. Regardless of the reasons they want the number for, advertising, or collecting information, it could also be said that if you are entering the US, and you don't have a credit card, for say emergencies, or you get mugged and all your cash is taken, or you lose your cash, or you accidentally burn your travelers cheques, that you need a credit card for purchases, you are now going to be a leach on the US tax payers in the event you end up in hospital (if you dont have any travel insurance).

      Just saying, having a credit card is not always a bad thing (if you know how to use one responsibly), and I as a tax payer, would prefer that travelers have some sort of method to pay for emergencies rather then using tax payer funds should the need arise.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    10. Re:Reminds me... by DarthBart · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't have a credit card, then it must mean that you're trying to do things with untraceable cash. And that means you're a terrorist!

    11. Re:Reminds me... by Natales · · Score: 4, Informative

      The US already collects vasts amount of information as part of the visa application process for any foreign national, all paid by the applicant.

      Different countries pay different amounts. I wish the $10 would be the case. Chileans pay $131 just for a visitor's visa, and that doesn't even include all the expenses in getting the required paperwork.

      The US unfriendliness towards visitors you mention has been here for a long time, and it's manifested in many different ways, some subtle, some not.

    12. Re:Reminds me... by M-RES · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ya see - I always knew Bush's speech impediment would cause this sort of confusion. It's all because nobody could ever tell whether he was saying tourist or terrorist, so they decided to play it safe! ;)

    13. Re:Reminds me... by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      As ridiculous as those questions are, they serve a near-sensible purpose:
      If somebody is caught doing $bad_thing he denied planning on the form,
      even if the case is tricky, he can be prosecuted for lying to immigration.

      It's a sort of legal backup.

    14. Re:Reminds me... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      To prove he lied to immigration, you first have to prove that he actually did $bad_thing.

      Security Theatre has found its target audience, I see.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    15. Re:Reminds me... by Big+Hairy+Ian · · Score: 2, Funny

      How is having Credit Card going to help if it's stolen by the mugger???
      Of course they might spend less than my other half :)

      --

      Build a Man a Fire, and He'll Be Warm for a Day. Set a Man on Fire, and He'll Be Warm for the Rest of His Life.

    16. Re:Reminds me... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      That depends on what your definition of "is" is...

    17. Re:Reminds me... by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even banks in Switzerland are routinely turning over information on account holders these days.

      And that is why I only trust Nigerians to handle my financial affairs.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    18. Re:Reminds me... by easyTree · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I've been caught waterboarding someone, is is isn't otherwise it's is and vice-versa. How about you?

    19. Re:Reminds me... by jgardia · · Score: 1

      I (as most South americans) have already to pay us$45 to enter USA, in cash, every time I enter, plus us$130 for the visa, if you get one (I've never had troubles, but a friend was rejected twice). Please don't give me more reasons not to enter USA again.

    20. Re:Reminds me... by M-RES · · Score: 1

      "You accidentally burn your Travellers Cheques"? Well surely you could just as easily accidentally burn your credit card too, so where's the advantage?

      If you have a record of your Traveller's Cheque numbers you can get them replaced anyway ;)

    21. Re:Reminds me... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

      You are probably right, but still it is one of my futile attempts to jus try and make it harder on them :)

      It is just sad to be treated like this and there is nothing one can do about it.

    22. Re:Reminds me... by bishop32x · · Score: 1

      The standard of proff required for deportation is different from the standard of proof required for conviction. It's similar to how conspiracy charges are easier to prosecute than the crime itself.

    23. Re:Reminds me... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      If you're caught doing $bad_thing, it is pretty easy to prove you actually did $bad_thing. Your hand will be red.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    24. Re:Reminds me... by mdwh2 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And I, as as taxpayer, would rather people be able to visit me without having these dumb systems forced upon them.

      I couldn't really care less if a trivial amount of my taxes goes towards giving emergency treatment to someone who needs it, but then I come from one of those weird countries where we have the radical notion of not asking for credit card details because someone's bleeding to death on the pavement.

    25. Re:Reminds me... by m0nkyman · · Score: 1

      If this doesn't get some 'funny' moderations, then the rating system is even more broken than I feared.

      --
      ~ a low user id is no indication I have a clue what I'm talking about.
    26. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know why the US would charge $131 for a US visa, but i was in Chile just a couple of months ago in June, and it cost me $131 (US) to enter the country of Chile.

      For Australians, it was 138 and they had to pay in US currency. it varied a few dollars depending on your nationality, but it was all about the same amount of money.

      Maybe the US isn't the only unfriendly country? At least when using your standards.

    27. Re:Reminds me... by ConfusedVorlon · · Score: 2, Funny

      http://cube1986.blogspot.com/2008/11/airport-security-dont-bother-asking.html

      such gems as :

      'are you seeking to engage in immoral activity'
        -well, what if I plan to cheat on my wife with my pa? does that mean I can't come in

      'are you involved in espionage'
      -doh; what did they tell me to answer to this one in spy school? er...

      'do you have a mental disorder'
      -Gary McKinnon claims asbergers syndrome. Does that mean he can't come in?

    28. Re:Reminds me... by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

      Or, they think it's drugs. Just because 2 guys were driving from Ontario to Detroit to eat at White Castle after watching Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle does not mean there's drugs in the car.

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    29. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now now, you're forgetting the most diffcult one "[x] I have not committed genocide"

      I knew my Nethack playing days would come back to haunt me!

    30. Re:Reminds me... by TheGuapo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Check out Virtual Account Numbers - I think Citibank offers these. They are one-time use, throw away credit card numbers. I use them for virtually all online purchase along with purchases from entities I don't trust. The US Government would definitely go into that category.

    31. Re:Reminds me... by cart_man4524 · · Score: 1

      Its better then the University that I go to that insists on charging an international student fee of $2.00 to every student that enrolls. Lets face it, who would take the time to argue 2 bucks....but then remember 2 bucks times 10s of thousands of students...sounds like a good business

    32. Re:Reminds me... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      But were you dealing drugs?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    33. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Funny you say that. I live in England on a non-EU passport. When I want to go to Belgium I have to call a premium rate number (no not an 0800 or a local call, but a premium rate number). I pay while they take their time to answer. When they do I have to hand over my CC number so I can be charged xx euro, just to get them to make an appointment.

    34. Re:Reminds me... by nazsco · · Score: 1

      > "You accidentally burn your Travellers Cheques"? Well surely you could just as easily accidentally burn your credit card too, so where's the advantage?

      that's why they associate your credit card number with your teeth at airport checkin. duh.

    35. Re:Reminds me... by MrMr · · Score: 1

      You don't need credit to travel.
      Travelers checks -> Will be replaced (normally within 24 hours) after theft or loss.
      Non-third world banking system -> Log in to your bank account and transfer to local office.
      About health insurance: Are there countries where you are not insured, but where you still can get card with enough credit to pay for an operation?

      Just saying, travelers are not a problem for the US tax payer, but debts from credit cards sure can be.

    36. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the American government is forcing other countries to check and triple-check passengers boarding flights into the US, some of them are taking retaliatory measures against Americans.
      Chile forces American tourists to pay an immigration fee to cover the cost the American government forces them to incur on outbound flights.
      Brazil harasses American tourists (tosses luggage, makes them take off their shoes, delay them) in immigration and customs the same way Brazilian citizens are mistreated when entering the US.

    37. Re:Reminds me... by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 0, Troll

      Wow.. modded troll.. my first ever troll categorization....

      Anyways, while I generally do not mind my taxes going to help people in emergency rooms, at the same time, I would prefer that people who can afford it, not use my taxes.

      And really, is it that much of a deal to expect people visiting a foreign nation to have sufficient funds or credit (or debit card preferably) on record that shows they can afford to be in the country for whatever reason. I am not advocating that the information be stored and used by the gov, or any entity other then your own financial institution, but is it really that big of a deal.

      Granted the examples I used earlier, probably sucked, I will admit that, I am at work, and commenting here is not exactly that high of a priority where I will sit for an hour trying to word out a witty and useful comment.

      The point remains the same though, people visiting should be able to prove in some way they are financially stable as to not be an anchor on the country they are visiting, USA, or other countries.

      --
      I came, I conquered, I coredumped
    38. Re:Reminds me... by interval1066 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't feel alone. I'm a US Citizen and I get the rude treatment whenever I want back in. Makes kinda wonder why I want back in so badly.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    39. Re:Reminds me... by ghmh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A lot of it is also tit-for-tat. You charge us, therefore we'll charge you. Plus if country x does something country y doesn't like they'll sometimes suddenly require visa's like the French did for Australians when the Australians complained about them doing nuclear testing in the South Pacific.

    40. Re:Reminds me... by wurp · · Score: 1

      If you think it feels bad to do it once every few months, just imagine what we folks who have to live here feel like ;-)

    41. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      then canceling my card and getting a new one

      Assuming U.S. authorities are using your credit card information to track behavioral patterns, that won't help you much if the card is issued by the same bank. Even banks in Switzerland are routinely turning over information on account holders these days.

      Just go online and get a pre-paid credit card from someone like Visa, and give that one the the customs jerkwads. If you're ultra paranoid then get some type of postal drop box or use a business address or something like an unused apartement building to ship it to. They'll still be able to link you via name and other details but not as directly.
      Trust me, they are every bit as much of a pack of anal retentive assmunchers to US citizens here in the states as they are to people overseas. We also have to pay them, but indirectly via taxes. They just get a little bit more uppity to non-citizens because, well, they think they are King Shit. And it doesn't help that the employees don't have to worry about get fired from their cushy government job for being rude.

    42. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Germany large chunks of the population have no credit cards - maybe they'll accept debit cards as well, contacting your bank right there and then....

    43. Re:Reminds me... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have traveled to the 3rd world more than once. The US boarder is far worse and has been for a long time. Heres the real funny part. I was only ever on connecting flights in the US. I have never gone all the way through customs! And that still worse than entering any 3rd world country I have visited.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    44. Re:Reminds me... by mikael · · Score: 0

      Better you get an appointment and be able to walk straight into the embassy and get your paperwork done, than have to queue for at least four hours outside the embassy/consulate. At least back in the mid 1990's, visitors had to do that in Toronto. Get there at 8:30am. There is a large queue of at least 200+ people that takes two hours to get through. Then once you get through that queue, there is another queue under some sheltered barriers which takes another hour and a half. Finally, you are in the embassy and now you have to queue to speak to one of the immigration staff - that takes another half hour.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    45. Re:Reminds me... by sosume · · Score: 1

      I don't have a credit card, and I am not planning to obtain one. It may be surprising to many US readers, but only a minority in Europe has one. SO are we all barred from entering the US now?

    46. Re:Reminds me... by Blrfl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      ...And don't think for a minute that the issuing bank doesn't keep records of which accounts were issued to what customers and when.

    47. Re:Reminds me... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I became a U.S. citizen sometime before 9/11, and the form for that still asked me whether I had worked for the government of Germany between the years 1933 and 1945. No joke.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    48. Re:Reminds me... by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

      I became a U.S. citizen sometime before 9/11, and the form for that still asked me whether I had worked for the government of Germany between the years 1933 and 1945. No joke.

      Um, and...? You say "sometime before 9/11", so let's guess that this was in 2000. At that point 1945 was only 55 years in the past. It's not inconceivable that someone in their early twenties could have been working for the German government in 1945, and now in their late seventies wants to become a US citizen.

      The question itself may or may not be relevant for citizenship, but there were certainly people alive in 2000 who could truthfully answer "yes" to it. Even now it's only about 10 years later; those same people would be in their late eighties. That question will still be applicable for at least the next 20 years.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    49. Re:Reminds me... by dkleinsc · · Score: 5, Funny

      'do you have a mental disorder'

      Why yes, yes I do. I'm a pathological liar on questions like this one.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    50. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The visa fees are reciprocal - the US charges what the other country charges to issue a visa for US nationals.

    51. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you don't think that number won't still be tied to your account? how do they get the money then?

    52. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      suddenly require visa's like the French did for Australians when the Australians complained about them doing nuclear testing in the South Pacific.

      Most countries suddenly started requiring visas from Australians, right about when Australia became all xenophobic and started requiring visas of everyone else - even Western countries that normally participate in visa waiver schemes with each other. If it was about the nuclear testing, then why have New Zealanders not been similarly punished, even after putting two DGSE agents on trial for a terror attack on a Greenpeace ship?

    53. Re:Reminds me... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      They are one-time use, throw away credit card numbers.

      I believe you have to present the card that you used to book the flight during the check-in process.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    54. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 bucks times 10s of thousands of students...sounds like a good business

      Right, because the tuition itself would never be the basis for a good business...

      Some small admin fee like that sounds like another token gesture based on some policy to recover costs for non-local processing fees.

    55. Re:Reminds me... by jamstar7 · · Score: 3, Funny

      What, they trying to elicit a charge of perjury or something based on the answers to these questions? If so, why not ask people "Have you stopped beating your wife? [Y/N]'

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    56. Re:Reminds me... by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      The virtual account numbers are not anonymous. When you use them, all you are doing is providing a short-lived account number that expires after I believe 1 hour. The account is not anonymous so it can be tracked back to you. In fact, when you use it online you still need to provide your name as printed on the "virtual card". I'm sure if DHS made a query citibank, being one of that banks that offer this service, would be able to provide the information without issue.

    57. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't honestly think it's the US Government that fits in that category but rather the US Security apparatus...which I think is a distinct entity unto itself over there...

    58. Re:Reminds me... by wufpak · · Score: 1

      Chile is very clear and upfront about the reason for the $131 entry charge: it's because that's exactly what the US charges them for a visa. If the US quit charging, so would Chile.

      In that respect, I found Chile *far* more civilized than the US.

    59. Re:Reminds me... by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      All large organizations treat individuals like shit.

    60. Re:Reminds me... by V+for+Vendetta · · Score: 2, Informative

      Regardless of the reasons they want the number for [...]

      They don't "want" that number. What you see in TFA is a standard (Passenger Name Record (PNR). Most flight bookings finally end up in a computer reservation system. The system this PNR's from is Amadeus. And yes, they include all the listed information. The older information mentioned most likely stems from his customer profile record in Amadeus.

    61. Re:Reminds me... by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      Well just so you know, I live in Belgium and if I want to get my paperwork to travel to the US I have to CALL the US embassy (I cannot just go there, no sir, we're all terrorist here in Europe, you see) and without so much as getting a human operator to respond, like to - I don't know, ask me what the hell I want - I just have to hand over my CC number so I can be charged xx dollars, just to get them to make an appointment.

      I find that very disturbing, off putting and blatantly rude... It is not because the US can do that that it bloody should. I do not want to go to the US but sometimes the circumstances force me to, but when I do I am treated like a piece of s**t with no rights... It really makes me want to go through all the hassle of getting my visa, then canceling my card and getting a new one.

      Maybe try the Mexican embassy next time, that might be easier ;)

    62. Re:Reminds me... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

      But not all organizations pretend to be the ultimate defenders of the FREE world.

      Freedom and justice for all and all hat stuff...

      Should be "Freedom and Justice for all... IF and WHEN it suits US"

      (pun intended with those caps ;)

    63. Re:Reminds me... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

      Your point being??

      I do not care what others do.

      My experience is just that I have to provide my CC numbers and be charged without even as much as an explanation (why, are my CC data safe, why is the fee as high as it is...) before I can even talk to someone.

      In that respect the US are behaving no better than dirty Mexican border patrolmen that want you to give them some money (because I guess that is what you are implying)

    64. Re:Reminds me... by thewils · · Score: 1

      Yes agreed, but at least if someone gets hold of the card details they can't use it.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    65. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Belgium is part of the visa waiver program so is most of europe, In the old days all you had to do was have a passport good for atleast 90days and fill out the I94W on the plane, now it is done in advance online but as far as I understand it is the same, just last longer so you don't have to do it everytime.

      so why can't you do like everyone else and just go? citizen of another country not part of the vwp and living in belgium on some kind of visa?

    66. Re:Reminds me... by bkpark · · Score: 1

      I visited the US before 9/11:

      [x] I am not a communist

      That's interesting. Apparently that question is no longer part of the questionnaire you fill out to be a czar at the White House.

      And to think there were times in the last few decades when you couldn't get a job in the private sector (i.e. movie industry) if it was known that you were a communist...

    67. Re:Reminds me... by SuseLover · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, I liked travelling to the US better when all I had to do was check the correct boxes on the amusing green form:

      [x] I am not a terrorist [x] I am not planning a child abduction in the US

      I visited the US before 9/11:

      [x] I am not a communist

      If you leave that last one unchecked it might now get you invited to become one of Obama's "advisors".

    68. Re:Reminds me... by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      More importantly, if you offer to pay in US dollars, they HAVE to take it. That lovely little fine print on the bills: "Legal Tender for All Debts, Public or Private". . . .

    69. Re:Reminds me... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1, Troll

      Good thing it's not a joke because it's not even slightly funny.

      What's your point exactly? The US shouldn't be asking people if they were (or at least could have been) Nazis!? Seriously?

      How could anybody possibly object to that question?

    70. Re:Reminds me... by thetagger · · Score: 1
      I don't know why the US would charge $131 for a US visa, but i was in Chile just a couple of months ago in June, and it cost me $131 (US) to enter the country of Chile.

      It's called reciprocity, they charge US citizens because the US charges Chilean citizens.

      I've been to Chile recently and I didn't even need a passport, much less visas or fees. Due to the same reciprocity principle.

      Get a non-xenophobic country,

    71. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What paperwork do you need? Belgian citizens usually do not require a visa for tourist travel, as they are part of the Visa Waiver program.

    72. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and the other half of the time those countries are paranoid dictatorships and they STILL are more efficient and non-threatening at the border than US border guards.

    73. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is incorrect.

      The visa interview fee is standard throughout the world - $131 or the equivalent in local currency. There are no other expenses involved in the completing the paperwork, unless you hire someone to fill out the form for you.

      There are occasionally reciprocity fees for countries that charge Americans more.

    74. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but you do have to go through immigrations and that's the bad part. Customs is nothing - in most cases you walk straight through unless you checked the "yes I have filled my suitcase to the gills with cocaine" checkbox.

    75. Re:Reminds me... by Petaris · · Score: 1

      I'm a US citizen who travels to Japan fairly often and if I want to call the US Embassy in Tokyo I have to pay x number of dollars and get to talk to a call center in India. Its not just foreigners that get treated that way, its everyone. I usually try working through the much friendlier consulate, not sure if there is one in Belgium or if they will help with VISAs but you could check and give it a try. I will say that when I was actually at the Embassy the people were pretty nice, but the fact that you can't actually talk to (or even email) anyone there sucks. BTW, they charge for emails too and I'm pretty sure they go to a call center in India too. :(

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    76. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The keyword there being debts. Just like retail stores can legally decline to accept certain denominations of bills for a purchase, I'm sure DHS could also come up with a reason that avoids that pesky phrase.

    77. Re:Reminds me... by houghi · · Score: 1

      They used to have that at Citibank in Belgium. Not anymore. Now I understand why.
      Their excuse was that it was safer now they use "Visa / MasterCard SecureCode". The downside is that it is yet another password what I apparently need to remember. However none of the stores I use use it.

      Till now the security questions that were asked by people from citibank where very generic and could be had by every person who stole my wallet.
      What is your postal code. (Check my ID I have in my wallet)
      What is your birth date. (Check my ID I have in my wallet)
      What is the limit of your card. When that was asked I really did not know and said "I believe between 2 and 5 thousand." and it was enough to satisfy them. No other question exept these three have ever been asked.

      I felt safer when I used the virtual accounts.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    78. Re:Reminds me... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Actually they don't.

      Legal Tender for All Debts, Public or Private

      This is not a debt being referred to here.

    79. Re:Reminds me... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Is that from personal experience? And if so--why in the hell did you go to Detroit? Buffalo has a far lower risk of death, while still being a shithole.

    80. Re:Reminds me... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      No, you missed him entirely (though that's not really your fault, since few non-Americans would catch it).

      His implication was that you travel to Mexico and then just walk north across the border. If it's good enough for 12 million people, it's good enough for you.

    81. Re:Reminds me... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get a non-xenophobic country,

      But I'd have to reroll for that, and I've got too much rep grinding invested into this toon.

    82. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No discussion involved, you give us the credit card number or you stand there forever as far they are concerned.

    83. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash; You are not an American citizen so you don't have the rights of an American citizen.

    84. Re:Reminds me... by LLKrisJ · · Score: 1

      Lol...

      Are the checks really that bad at that border??? I would be surprised. Back here they show us NatGeo documentaries about how brutally efficient US border patrols are at keeping out Mexicans, using all sorts of new fangled equipment :)

      It would be especially absurd since I know for a fact that Mexicans cannot even do a transit flight through the US. (for example fly from Brussels to NY to get a connection to Mexico. Even if the Airport transit zone is supposed to be just that, a transit zone, not part of actual US territory... absurd...

    85. Re:Reminds me... by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      and if you're caught doing $bad_thing, they can go after you for that and don't need to go after you for lying to immigration.

      On the other hand if they only *think* you did $bad_thing they can't prove that you lied to immigration either, so it's essentially the same sort of backup as having 2 copies of your important files on the same drive.

    86. Re:Reminds me... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm a US citizen who travels to Japan fairly often and if I want to call the US Embassy in Tokyo I have to pay x number of dollars and get to talk to a call center in India.

      Are you sure you can't just call "Tel. (03) 3224-5000 / DSN 224-5000 Switchboard"? I was just at a consulate yesterday, and they took walk-ins (unlike Japan) and I called ahead and there were humans there.

      I usually try working through the much friendlier consulate, not sure if there is one in Belgium or if they will help with VISAs but you could check and give it a try.


      Ah, that could be part of the issue. I was indeed at a consulate, and not the embassy. The embassies are US soil and are treated diferently. However, here the capital city, where they put embassies, is not the largest city, so they have all consular activities out of a consulate office in the largest city. In most locations, like Japan, the capital is also the largest city, so they will consoladate the functions into one building. The last time I was past a US embassy was more than 20 years ago, so I would guess they increased security (and thus decreased access) in that time.

      BTW, they charge for emails too and I'm pretty sure they go to a call center in India too.

      Charge for emails? How? They send you something back saying "We have the answer for that, but you have to give us $5 first so we can answer it."? I never tried sending an email, just about everything I need is online, and the phone gets answered here.

    87. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find that very disturbing, off putting and blatantly rude... It is not because the US can do that that it bloody should. I do not want to go to the US but sometimes the circumstances force me to, but when I do I am treated like a piece of s**t with no rights...

      If the US treated everybody nicely, why in the hell should somebody hate them to the point of becoming a terrorist and giving them the opportunity to use that argument when they want to invade foreign countries?

    88. Re:Reminds me... by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I liked travelling to the US better when all I had to do was check the correct boxes on the amusing green form

      Well, lying on that form is a crime. So if you come into the country under false pretenses, they can legally arrest you, whereas I'm not sure what legal standing the US has to prosecute, say war crimes committed in Bosnia.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    89. Re:Reminds me... by Timex · · Score: 1

      Regardless of the reasons they want the number for, advertising, or collecting information, it could also be said that if you are entering the US, and you don't have a credit card, for say emergencies, or you get mugged and all your cash is taken, or you lose your cash, or you accidentally burn your travelers cheques, that you need a credit card for purchases, you are now going to be a leach on the US tax payers in the event you end up in hospital (if you dont have any travel insurance).

      Completely a red herring, simply because people have managed to come across the border without dealing with the scenario(s) you present long before credit cards were in common usage.

      ...I as a tax payer, would prefer that travelers have some sort of method to pay for emergencies rather then using tax payer funds should the need arise.

      The unfortunate souls that find themselves in need of medical care when they are visiting this country (I'm in the USA too) usually have some way to arrange for payment, even if it takes a few days for things to coalesce. Most of the abuse of the "tax payer funds" seems to come about when people come into this country illegally.

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    90. Re:Reminds me... by Timex · · Score: 1

      If you don't have a credit card, then it must mean that you're trying to do things with untraceable cash. And that means you're a terrorist!

      Hrm. "This note is legal tender for all debts public and private"... That's what MY bills say, and they were issued by the US Government. What does that say about THEM? (You don't have to go there if you don't wanna.)

      --
      When politicians are involved, everyone loses.
    91. Re:Reminds me... by gateur · · Score: 1

      The US already collects vasts amount of information as part of the visa application process for any foreign national, all paid by the applicant.

      Different countries pay different amounts. I wish the $10 would be the case. Chileans pay $131 just for a visitor's visa, and that doesn't even include all the expenses in getting the required paperwork.

      The US unfriendliness towards visitors you mention has been here for a long time, and it's manifested in many different ways, some subtle, some not.

      After spending six weeks and $400 of needless nuisance fees and charges, I was forbidden by the U.S. State Department from accompanying my Filipino wife into the U.S. Embassy where she was asked two pointless questions, then denied a 2 week tourist visa needed to accompany me back to the U.S. for a brief business related trip. The U.S. State Department is so broken it encourages illegal immigration by denying legal tourist and work visas. That's why there are 14 million illegal aliens who waltzed across the Texas border to work illegally and supply drugs to the likes of Rush Limbaugh. I don't care what DHS has on me. If they want me they can come and get me, I won't be coming back on my own.

    92. Re:Reminds me... by mi · · Score: 1

      I always knew Bush's speech impediment would cause this sort of confusion.

      Well, his teleprompter had everything nicely spelled-out. Oh, wait, he rarely used one — and mostly for phonetic spellings of remote locales and foreign names.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    93. Re:Reminds me... by Omestes · · Score: 1

      Agreed, no one has any rights but Americans, and no one deserves to be treated reasonably (or decently) except American citizens.

      Sarcasm there, Mods.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    94. Re:Reminds me... by Petaris · · Score: 1

      The email thing is for the VISA Services department. This is an excerpt from the site:

      "Follow-Up Inquiries

      Once we have responded to your inquiry we will not respond to any additional follow-up questions unless you pay for another email inquiry.

      2. Price

      The cost of this Service is 2129 yen per inquiry payable by VISA, MasterCard or JCB card.

      Refunds

      Generally, we will not refund your money once you enter your credit card information. However, we will refund your money if we do not receive your inquiry due to a technical error after the payment transaction was successfully completed. You need to proceed through this application until you get to the Inquiry Category. In User Type, please select 'Free Inquiries about Billing' from the dropdown menu, and then click 'Go to the Inquiry Form'.

      3. Response Time
      Normally we will send an answer to your question within three business days. However, during our peak times of the year, a response may take longer than three business days."

      There is a general email form on the Contact Us page but it warns that they generally don't reply to something that they receive via that form. :(

      As of this writing the 2129 JPY is equivalent to $23.11 USD. Not a cheap email by any means. There are other things, non-VISA related, that you can use to contact the Embassy but my contact was all VISA related.

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    95. Re:Reminds me... by Petaris · · Score: 1

      The site the excerpt is from: https://japan.us-visaservices.com/Forms/default.aspx

      Click on the Continue button to see the page its from.

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    96. Re:Reminds me... by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

      Credit Card numbers are useless to even the DHS, if they are acquired under false pretenses.

      A long time ago I read a book called "Hacksaw", about a long-time felon that had, at that time, held the record for the most prison/custody escapes.

      The first thing he did when he escaped was to head to the nearest cemetery. He then began looking for headstones that had a birth date near to that of his own (but NOT the exact same), AND had a death date less then a year more recent then the birth date on the stone. In short, he looked for the gravestones of children that died shortly after birth. He wrote these names down, then did a little library research to determine if the child had died in same locale (newspaper obituaries). If they did, he discarded the name and researched the next.

      What he was trying to do was find a child that had died in area DIFFERENT then where it had been born. He had figured out that unless BOTH the birth certificate and death certificate were on file in the same recording office, he could then apply for a new birth certificate in that child's name with almost zero chance of the recording office realizing the name was that of a dead child. Since the child was dead, and at such a young age, the chances the child had been issued a SS# were next to nil.

      At this point he could apply for a birth certificate in that child's name, a VALID SS#, and from that point he had a new identity that was not stolen. It was now HIS, and it worked like a charm every single time he used this method. I see no reason to think that he could not start creating a decent credit profile with a clean record.

      I have no idea how this would work these days (he was doing it back in the 70's), what with all the new-fangled techy stuff, but it goes to show that where there is a will, there is a way.

      Security Theatre, indeed.

    97. Re:Reminds me... by Haxzaw · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry you have to put up with such nonsense. If Patrick Henry and his peers were around today, I'm sure they'd be calling for a revolution. Problem is, most people don't care as long as they can watch TV and eat at McDonalds. I am truly bothered by what you foreigners have to put up with, and certainly troubled by what we citizens have to put up with.

    98. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This note is legal tender for all debts, public and private...

      It's pretty bad when a government won't accept its own money.

      That said, it makes good sense. The DHS wants to investigate people. If you have a card, you're already somewhat investigated, and that's a certain amount of investigation they don't have to repeat. Also, if most terrorists reject America and see a credit card as a sign of American excess, it may be prescreening against those who possible don't mean well.

      Of course if the Bahamas did it we'd cry that they're trying to focus on profitable tourists.

      In any case, when this sort of thing is allowed to happen, is it any wonder people don't believe the real purpose behind the DHS is to keep anyone safe? Admittedly this is probably covered in a dozen regulations and the info is supposed to be blocked out, but if not, imagine what this means... Nearly all or all of Congress voted to allow identity theft against you. BOTH parties. Take note of who cares about fixing this. (Probably no one, though both sides will point the finger at the other, IF they acknowledge it. Much like both sides blaming the other for the financial crisis, when BOTH were happy to send jobs overseas for years.)

      But wait, it's not a bug, it's a feature! Discovered that your neighbor is a terrorist? No one believes you? Drain his card, THAT'LL show 'em! (Except that he wasn't going to pay it off anyway, what with the suicide bombing he was planning...)

    99. Re:Reminds me... by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

      Well five years ago after drinking excessively and watching the first Harold and Kumar film my friend and I decided to go to the nearest Whit Castle, which according to Google Maps was in Detroit beating out some where in New York State by 30 km. The next day we drove through to Detroit through a sow storm, at the border in the interest of full disclosure I told the guard that we were headed to White Castle, he then spent the next 15 minutes questioning us on things like our current employment, income source, drug use etc...Once we arrived a White Castle, we found that there were 2 drivethroughs no dinning room and 2 inch plexiglass covering the walk up window, with some guy sitting on the ground beside the door asking for spare change (my friend gave him a loonie) we ordered, ate in my car with and headed back for the 6 hour return trip. The Canadian guard asked 3 quick question and we were back on our side of the border, the burgers were ok, but not worth the trip. I decided to limit my cross border food runs to Olive Garden and Cracker Barrel not necessarily in that order.

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    100. Re:Reminds me... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Sure, but:

      1. Why on Earth would I answer truthfully? Is falsifying an immigration document ]worse than being a war criminal?
      2. Question 3 was, "What is your date of birth?"
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    101. Re:Reminds me... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      It will require an extra step by the data miners: they have to ask the bank for every number/customer combination for which other numbers they have for the same customer. This may or may not include your commonly used credit card, depending on what you do. So at the very least it makes data mining based on your credit card number harder. And assuming it is done automatically, much harder. In practice it may even kill the whole use of the credit card number in such data mining operations.

      Now when there is a concrete suspicion on you (maybe because you use different CC numbers all the time?) then they may put a real human on the case, who could start requesting more information from the bank. Manually.

    102. Re:Reminds me... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Buffalo lacks the lively atmosphere, and it's a lot farther from Windsor. Also, there's no White Castle in Buffalo.

    103. Re:Reminds me... by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      There are probably some similar techniques in use now, but the Tax Reform Act of 1986 made it impossible to claim a dependent (over the age of 2? maybe? something like that) on your tax return unless said dependent had an SSN. Now, pretty much everybody has an SSN.

    104. Re:Reminds me... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Depends on where you're talking about, the border is just shy of 2000 miles (3000 km), and there are an estimated half million illegal entries into the US every year (I'm pulling all my statistics here from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexico_%E2%80%93_United_States_border for lack of a better source on hand).

      Most of the border is unfenced, and barely patrolled. Portions near San Diego and El Paso are the most heavily patrolled, and some areas have sophisticated sensors to alert Border Patrol agents (motion sensors, etc.) During part of the 1990s there were military units deployed with infrared camera systems (those could be called brutally effective, but they never operated on more than a 100 mile stretch at a time).

      For most of the border the only things stopping you from crossing are 1) Rugged, desolate terrain that can kill you if you aren't prepared, or 2) the unlikely chance a lone Border Patrol agent will stumble into you (they usually patrol solo in those areas because there are so few of them--one got killed, executed by drug runners a few months back).

      Border security is anything but effective or efficient though, except for a few isolated cases/areas.

    105. Re:Reminds me... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I'm confused, you are a US citizen trying to get a visa? The only visas that US citizens mess with is filing K1 and the like. Otherwise, I can't think of why you'd be asking them about visas. And, from my experience, getting a lawyer is by far the best way to handle a K1 or other family visa, as you mess up one step, and you are back at square one (or worse). I know a good immigration attorney in Alaska, if you need a reference.

      But from looking at the Japan site http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/ I didn't see any links to that site. On a net search, I found references where it just replaces using the phone to make an appointment. And I saw nothing that indicated you couldn't just make an appointment by calling the main switchboard for free. I'm not saying that it isn't the case, but that it appears to be not much different than where I am, and as I said earlier, I was just at a different consulate yesterday with a walk-up and was serviced quickly and without an appointment for the fee that was plainly stated on the embassy web site.

      http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/info/tinfo-contact.html for contact, use phone, fax or letters and they will respond, as per http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/info/tinfo-email.html. I saw no reference to paying to email, other than the service you stated which I couldn't find referenced directly on the .gov site. Is that a real government site, or is it a private partner that translates emails to phone calls for a fee? I did see a direct reference to it from other embassy sites, so it is certainly sanctioned by the gvt if not run by them.

      What happens if you call the switchboard? What happens if you call and they won't answer, but you ask for an appointment to speak in person with someone? They did sound like they'd give you the kiss-off over general visa questions as they state everything you need to know is already on the web site.

    106. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The visa fees are reciprocal - the US charges what the other country charges to issue a visa for US nationals.

      It's the other way around. Stop with the lies. They're easily spotted and make you look bad. Not that you care anyways, but still...

    107. Re:Reminds me... by Petaris · · Score: 1

      It was for an I-130 VISA for my wife. And that site is directly linked from the Embassy website. As I stated above that is for VISA services, not general American Citizen Services. To my knowledge it isn't for translation services though perhaps that may be covered under it. It is for any question you have related to VISAs.

      Check this page: http://tokyo.usembassy.gov/e/visa/tvisa-ivspouse.html in the gray "Contact Us" box on the left or this page: http://japan.usembassy.gov/e/visa/tvisa-nivcontact.html about half way down under "Email Inquiry Service"

      --
      ~Petaris "The world is open. Are you?"
    108. Re:Reminds me... by Espressor · · Score: 1

      No I don't think so. I am fairly sure I didn't have to do that last time I checked in for my round-trip to the US from the UK. The credit card should only be for identification. As long as they can see your passport, which is mandatory anyway, you shouldn't have to present your CC.

    109. Re:Reminds me... by Espressor · · Score: 1

      Right before immigration checks, the USCIS banner says that they strive to welcome anyone with courtesy. Maybe they forgot to tell their employees about that.

    110. Re:Reminds me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That rather sounds like the point of issuing temporary numbers. Only you and the bank know when that number is valid for use. I would even expect it to appear on my printed statement from them.

    111. Re:Reminds me... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    112. Re:Reminds me... by bishop32x · · Score: 1
      Try looking here: http://immigration.lawyers.com/deportation/Burdens-of-Proof-in-Deportation-and-Removal-Actions.html

      The deference is between "beyond a reasonable doubt" and "clear and convincing".

    113. Re:Reminds me... by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      You win teh intartubes!

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  3. Dupe by Arkaic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hrmm. I think this was pretty much covered in this past article: http://yro.slashdot.org/story/09/01/06/2238228/A-Peek-At-DHSs-Files-On-You?art_pos=4 Perhaps a different person's records, but basically the same deal, from what I can see so far.

    1. Re:Dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Similar, but tracking credit cards is different.

  4. Hush, citizen. by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Your full, unencrypted credit card information available in our logs to every DHS employee is necessary for us to fight the evil terrorists.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely right! You wouldn't believe the number of hookers and the amount of blow needed to keep up our morale here at DHS.

    2. Re:Hush, citizen. by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Technology has changed, therefore it's necessary for the Supreme Court to rethink some of its past decisions. "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects..." should apply to ALL papers/data even if it's not in the citizen's immediate possession. The government should not be able to obtain your personal credit cards numbers from a 3rd party without first getting a warrant from a judge.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Hush, citizen. by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Citizen, you have dared to question the supreme legal, moral, and constitutional authority of our anti-terrorism methods. Not only that, but you have also exposed yourself as an EVIL anti-American communist socialist fascist islamist anti-war drug doing child molesting hippy. Our officers will arrive promptly to detain you. Have a nice day, DHS

      --
      SSC
    4. Re:Hush, citizen. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      More likely, we'll get some cryptofascist who calls himself a "strict constructionist" to tell us that, if the founding fathers wouldn't have recognized it on sight, it couldn't possibly be covered by the constitution.

    5. Re:Hush, citizen. by deblau · · Score: 1

      The government should not be able to obtain your personal credit cards numbers from a 3rd party without first getting a warrant from a judge.

      Your fingerprint is personal. Your DNA is personal. Your credit card numbers are not personal, they are assigned to you by a large, multinational corporation that lobbies the government for things like overlooking large executive pay packages.

      --
      This post expresses my opinion, not that of my employer. And yes, IAAL.
    6. Re:Hush, citizen. by isa-kuruption · · Score: 1

      Your credit card number isn't your property.. it's the property of the credit card company that issued the card. Therefore, they can distribute the number to whoever they want, including the US government. If you don't like them doing this, then protest and possibly stop using credit cards altogether.

    7. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, this "cryptofascist" you describe would then say since it isn't covered by the Constitution then it isn't legal for the government to do, since all rights not spelled out for the feds are left to the states and people.

    8. Re:Hush, citizen. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Except they never actually seem to get to that step. In practice, we've been in "the government can do everything not explicitly forbidden" mode for years now.

    9. Re:Hush, citizen. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I could see Ben Franklin spending about 5 minutes being amazed by a laptop before taking it apart to see how it worked. If he lived today, he would be a pony-tailed uberhacker.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    10. Re:Hush, citizen. by dkf · · Score: 1

      If [Ben Franklin] lived today, he would be a pony-tailed uberhacker.

      He'd also be 303 years old, and still a match for even Bruce Schneier.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    11. Re:Hush, citizen. by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Ha ha! But I am in England! Our prisons are cushy places, where they send you to amusement parks and give you free hookers daily!

      What? What the fudge is extradition? WHAT DO YOU MEAN THEY CAN FLY ME TO AMERICA TO TRY ME IN AN AMERICAN COURT FOR A CRIME I COMMITTED ON UK SOIL AND THEN SEND ME TO AMERICAN PMITA PRISON?!

      Who the hell is Garry McKinnon?

      AMERICUUR! FUCK YEAH!

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    12. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as its not the GOvt checking on terrorists.. but if it's Stop and Shop or walmart...thats cool....pinhead.

    13. Re:Hush, citizen. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>we'll get some cryptofascist who calls himself a "strict constructionist" to tell us that, if the founding fathers wouldn't have recognized it on sight, it couldn't possibly be covered by the constitution.
      >>>

      I'm not sure what "crypto" means but "fascist" refers to a third type of system where corporations would remain private, but government would be running the board of directors. Also known as "corporatism". I don't know any strict constructionists who support such a system because it would violate the Constitution.

      I'm a strict constructionist and I recognize that "papers and effects" would also cover data on a computer, thus the DHS would have to get a warrant to investigate it. They cannot just ask and receive automatically (as it works now). I would also invoke the 10th Amendment more frequently. For example, when was Congress ever granted the power to stop cars in the middle of a state like California or Texas or New Hampshire? Never. That power to police *within* a state belongs to the state legislature, not DHS or Congress.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    14. Re:Hush, citizen. by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Your credit card numbers are not personal, they are assigned to you by a large, multinational corporation

      So when someone steals from my credit number or my checking account number, and steals $10,000 from my account, I'm not supposed to take that personally??? (rolls eyes). Point - Yes these numbers are personal and need to be kept secret. The whole idea behind the 4th amendment is to keep the government in the dark about what you are doing, because you are supposed to be a liberated person not a slave.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    15. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely, we'll get some cryptofascist who calls himself a "strict constructionist" to tell us that, if the founding fathers wouldn't have recognized it on sight, it couldn't possibly be covered by the constitution.

      Anything NOT covered by the Constitution is NOT a power of the federal government.

      Where does this sense of "if there's nothing in the Constitution granting people a right then they don't have it" come from?

      You have every and all rights that have not been TAKEN from you by the Constitution (or state government).

    16. Re:Hush, citizen. by mdarksbane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The amazing thing about Frankling is that he seems to have been completely the fat, balding, pony-tailed hacker, and he *still* got all the chicks he could want. Guy was some kind of geek god.

    17. Re:Hush, citizen. by Elky+Elk · · Score: 1

      It also explains why no one has set up their own DHS with.....

    18. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IIRC, he was a pony-tailed uberhacker when he was alive.

    19. Re:Hush, citizen. by nilbog · · Score: 1

      Isn't this against the merchant agreements for most major credit cards? I'm pretty sure that the CC information is not to be transmitted to any 3rd parties and it certainly isn't supposed to be transferred or stored in plain text.

      Then again, DHS has consistently demonstrated that they believe rules don't apply to them.

      --
      or else!
    20. Re:Hush, citizen. by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

      Five minutes after putting it back together, Ben would put Linux on it.

    21. Re:Hush, citizen. by igny · · Score: 1

      Hey, can I ask them for your credit card information per the FIOA/Privacy Act?

      --
      In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. - Yogi Berra
    22. Re:Hush, citizen. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      As much as we (usually rightfully) talk shit about them, most departments of the US federal government have FOIA pages detailing how to send in requests, including the Department of Homeland Security.

      To answer your question though (from the page I linked),

      Information about another individual may be requested under the FOIA but release is subject to application of the balancing test to decide whether the privacy interest of the affected party outweighs the public interest in the release of said information.

      So probably not.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    23. Re:Hush, citizen. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Not only would he be an uberhacker, he would rename the country to GNU/USA.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    24. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citizen, you have dared to question the supreme legal, moral, and constitutional authority of our anti-terrorism methods. Not only that, but you have also exposed yourself as an EVIL anti-American communist socialist fascist islamist anti-war drug doing child molesting hippy. Our officers will arrive promptly to detain you.

      Have a nice day,
      DHS

      In case you haven't been paying attention I will point out that it's the communists, socialists and fascists that are welcome in the former USA (look at El Presidente's list of Czars) and it's the conservatives that have been targeted by the head of DHS. I don't have any links from 6 months handy but you could google for "Napolitano" and "fucking idiot".

    25. Re:Hush, citizen. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Therefore, they can distribute the number to whoever they want, including the US government.

      Then I would answer yes, they can, however, the government may not "listen" unless they have a court order.

    26. Re:Hush, citizen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could see Ben Franklin spending about 5 minutes being amazed by a laptop before taking it apart to see how it worked. If he lived today, he would be a pony-tailed uberhacker.

      and Ben would also be on the Terrorist Watch List along with his buddies Thomas Jefferson and George Washington.

    27. Re:Hush, citizen. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      At the time, I believe they were.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  5. At least the probably don't know how to use it... by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 4, Funny

    If they have that much useless detail on everyone, chances are they won't be able to actually find anything in it. Yay for security through obscurity.

    On the other hand, someone's probably going to break in and get all those credit card numbers...

  6. Nothing special. This is a PNR by aepervius · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Look at the record detail. You can even see on what CRS it was reserved : 1A. If you reserve everything with the CRS (for example at a travel agency) then ultimately everything is linked and saved there. Then most airline do not bother filtering they just send the whole kludge to the DHS. I commented the same, and yes indeed he blacked the name out, but left the RECORD LOCATOR, which is identifying the person too, if you have access to the CRS system.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by Punctuated_Equilibri · · Score: 1

      Actually sounds like a business travel profile. American Express has all my frequent flyer numbers as well as all the other information needed to book travel. If DHS was getting that, they would have everything mentioned. I travel every week so it would be extremely inconvenient if Amex did not have that stored. But DHS would need a warrant for that, I hope!

      --
      In group behavior: 'because they're evil/morons/sheep/crazy' is not 'insightful' it's 'oversimplified'
    2. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may sound like a business travel profile, but I agree with the previous poster that it is indeed a PNR (Passenger Name Record). I used to work for an airline that used TPF for reservations and that's what they look like.

    3. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by hey · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by Heyshen · · Score: 1

      Yup... Like you said, Continental just sent a printout of their screen to DHS in this case. Some travel agencies tend to put all the frequent flyer numbers they have on hand for the passenger on every reservation. All that is there is information that is usually found in a PNR. Seems like it was booked using Sabre. By the way, it's not just the US receiving this information. It is transmitted to all countries that request it. And that list of countries is expanding.

    5. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but the PNR can not be retrieved without the proper credentials (pseudo city), and internally companies like Sabre have robust auditing policies to curtail unauthorized access to customer data.

    6. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      Thank you.

      Come on people, if you use TLA (Three Letter Acronyms) at least have the courtesy to not make the somewhat arrogant assumption that just because you know what it is everyone else does.

    7. Re:Nothing special. This is a PNR by Tensor · · Score: 1

      This is indeed a simple PNR with preferences listed by the travel agent/reservation system.

      No you can't identify the person from the PNR unless you work at that same agency/system, or airlines, or sabre/amadeus/worldspan ... PNRs are locked to the issuing travel agency.

  7. Thank you Navy and EFF by emotionus · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Tor wouldn't help in this situation. All it would do is alter the IP address that you accessed your travel agent's website from. It wouldn't do anything about the need to provide your real name, credit card info passport info, and everything else required to get airplane and cruise tickets.

    2. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by lakin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Id be a bit concerned about using a service like Tor when booking your flights. After all, is letting them know your IP when they know so much else really a big deal? They already know a lot about who you are, yet it looks quite dodgy if you tried to mask yourself. Also, what if the pc you tor out to the internet from is flagged no-fly? Sure, you could probably eventually prove it was nothing to do with you, but it wouldnt be a fun day in the airport!

      --
      Paul
    3. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by emotionus · · Score: 1

      May be a good point. Right after I posted it I realized....hmm, sure, I am proxied but they still have a whole bunch of other identifying information.

    4. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by M-RES · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens if somebody else buys your airline ticket for you with their own credit card? Surely there's no right to hold the information of an individual not even entering the US? Oh this is a test case waiting to happen :D

    5. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      This is probably exactly what they are looking for. Say, 1 guy in the middle east buying 19 tickets or so, none for himself ...

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    6. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Is that the secret no-fly list that only you and the feds know about that contains IP addresses instead of names?

    7. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, using Tor would be kind of risky. Much better to just book the flight at a local coffee shop or even the airport itself, a hotel, etc. That way you are somewhat hiding your IP without looking like you are trying to hide it.

      Not that it really matters much however. This type of thing is actually used more to attempt to catch people involved in money laundering or drug smuggling than terrorism. Well, I guess to most in DHS and the federal government, they are all the same thing.

      But people who are planning to blow stuff up are usually savvy enough to hide the trail without it looking suspicious. On the other hand, you'd be surprised at how many rich people try to avoid taxes or shelter assets overseas yet leave obvious tracks because they don't understand the technology well enough to hide it.

    8. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by pipedwho · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing that companies in the middle east don't buy tickets for their employees. Oh wait..

    9. Re:Thank you Navy and EFF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if your extermal IP address (NAT) was flagged no-fly and you were always rejected on the airport without finding out the reason?

  8. The shoe issue by HasHPIT · · Score: 1

    You can read all about the shoe issue in:
    "Shoes: Comfortable piece of clothing or The Ultimate Hiding Spot!" (unfortunately nobody RTFA that concluded that they were indeed just comfortable and not a particular good for hiding stuff).

    Just imagine the things I could hide in my shoes....and not in my pants/shirt/other. The posibilities are endless.

  9. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by jomegat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Since they have your CC number, what would stop them from using it to buy something incriminating? Hey DHS, can't find the missing link? Provide it yourself then!

    --

    In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they're not.

  10. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by savuporo · · Score: 1

    If they have that much useless detail on everyone, chances are they won't be able to actually find anything in it

    They'll fix the problem by hiring a metric buttload of data mining consultants.

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
  11. Virtual Credit Card Number? by 2phar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you book with a one-use virtual credit card number, is that what appears on the record? Does it produce all previously used cc numbers too? This looks like just the airline passing on their booking/customer db record, but if it was the actual CC that would be real tin foil hat time.

    1. Re:Virtual Credit Card Number? by Tensor · · Score: 1

      It shows up as that virtual CC# ... that is just the number the agent used to issue the ticket and secure the hotel reservations (may be a different one for each)

      All the credit-cards you used in the past 10 years for almost anything large travel related (car rental reservation, hotel res, plane ticket) is kept, all the planes you took (full data, like seat, fare..), hotel data, travel preferences are also kept.

  12. And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by EWAdams · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd rather have all the CCTV in the world than giving my entire identity, credit cards and all, to any DHS cocaine addict who happens to need a fix. At least CCTV can't read my passport and credit cards.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
    1. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Cyberax · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "At least CCTV can't read my passport and credit cards."

      Yet.

    2. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay then, let's install some CCTV cameras in your house/car/office cubicle. Thank you for making the world a saver place.

    3. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by xoundmind · · Score: 1

      Your CC number -> dealer's paypal account?

      That's what they call new efficiencies, I believe.

    4. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you keep your passport in a Faraday cage?

    5. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by risinganger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    6. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have NOTE OF ALL THIS! One bad does not make the other bad good!

      It's still totalitarian terrorism (and I mean the real definition of that word)!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    7. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Oh no! My bureaucratic id number is in the hands of a bureaucrat!

      Honestly, it's a bureaucrat's instrument and in no way related to you. Recordings of everything you do in public, now that says a good deal about you, who you are, what you do, where you go.

      You'd be surprised how little a purchasing record actually tells you about a person.

      But then, I suppose that does make false positives more likely on the credit card side than the CCTV side.

    8. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      False dichotomy.

      And you know, it isn't a competition. People who complain about CCTV are more likely to be people who complain about this sort of thing - they are hardly going to be supporting it. Unless you have evidence that the DHS is bitching about UK CCTV, your attempt to criticise people for hypocrasy is a straw man argument.

      (I'm British too, but your argument makes no sense.)

    9. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...yet.

    10. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You make it is a choice between one or the other. Unfortunately, it doesn't have to be.

    11. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      Speaking of Paypal, I wonder what DHS gets when you buy an airline ticket via Paypal, as I sometimes do.

      --
      This space available.
    12. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Did you see the cctv rfid reader thing at the last black hat?

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    13. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, I just zapped it in the microwave.

    14. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Nah, in the wavelength range that CCTV uses, even a thin covering of cloth is sufficient to block radiation to/from the passport.

    15. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have all the CCTV in the world than giving my entire identity, credit cards and all, to any DHS cocaine addict who happens to need a fix. At least CCTV can't read my passport and credit cards.

      Oh? And RFID-chipped documents is a good thing???

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    16. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by houghi · · Score: 1

      Actually, I do. Made an envelope of duct tape. Two layers of duct tape with aluminium foil in between. As an excuse I say I do not want it to become unreadable when crossing a border and the silver helps me find it much easier then the brownish red it is.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    17. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by jasno · · Score: 1

      I'd think a CCTV with a telephoto lens could read my CC every time I swipe it.. two cameras and you'd get the 3 digit number off the back.

      --

      http://www.masturbateforpeace.com/
    18. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by Tensor · · Score: 1

      so you just forgot about the whole RFID thing rite ?

    19. Re:And people bitch about British intrusiveness. by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      No, no "yet".

      Reading passports (and soon, credit cards) is what RFID readers are for. Hide one behind a thin plastic veneer somewhere, and collect away!

  13. I guess they won't know too much now... by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

    ...since the site is slashdotted.

    1. Re:I guess they won't know too much now... by plj · · Score: 1

      Try one of the following:

      I hope someone will mirror the PDF somewhere.

      --
      “Wait for Hurd if you want something real” –Linus
  14. Question... by emotionus · · Score: 1

    Can you copyright your personal data? And then sue the DHS for infringment?

    1. Re:Question... by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      Be careful what you wish for ... your credit card company might copyright your personal data and sue _you_ for using your own name!

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    2. Re:Question... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You can't copyright facts, only their presentation.

  15. PCI Compliance? by atchijov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Any business which is retaining credit card numbers and other personal information has to be PCI compliant. What about DHS?

    1. Re:PCI Compliance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering this very same thing.

    2. Re:PCI Compliance? by dannyrap · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not exactly. Any business that processes credit cards has to be PCI compliant. That means truncating the credit card number or encrypting it. So any company that give the DHS access to unencrypted credit card numbers no longer PCI compliant and is liable for damages in the event of a breach (which this may be).

    3. Re:PCI Compliance? by isa-kuruption · · Score: 1

      Chances are that Visa-Mastercard know these numbers exist in the US government system, but do not care. You really only need to be compliant if Visa-Mastercard enforces the compliance with fines... but then again, the fine is $25,000... so to the US government, they may just pay the non-compliance fine to get VM off the government's back.

    4. Re:PCI Compliance? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Except the government isn't the one collecting the numbers, it's the airlines (or your travel agent/website.) So the government has to be getting them from -somewhere-.

    5. Re:PCI Compliance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not exactly. Any business that processes credit cards has to be PCI compliant. That means truncating the credit card number or encrypting it. So any company that give the DHS access to unencrypted credit card numbers no longer PCI compliant and is liable for damages in the event of a breach (which this may be).

      Nope. It doesn't say that they can't give out the encryption key to the government, just that it has to be encrypted. DHS is capable of decrypting the data themselves.
      In most cases, as long as the communications channel itself is encrypted, they are free from liability.

      Shady, yes. Sleezy, yes. Underhanded... yes.

    6. Re:PCI Compliance? by joebp · · Score: 1

      No, such companies can be and are PCI-DSS compliant as long as their declared PCI information security policy includes the transmission of payments data to the DHS (and there certainly is space for such things in PCI to meet regulatory requirements), that transfers to DHS are suitably cryptographically protected if over an public network, and as long as the company informs the DHS in their role as a PCI "third party" of their responsibility to also store payments data securely under the PCI. Of course, whether the DHS are *actually* following section 9 of the PCI-DSS by mailing the guy his payment data is very questionable.

    7. Re:PCI Compliance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all know that DHS is the paragon of good network security. I feel more safe than ever.

    8. Re:PCI Compliance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a government agency?

    9. Re:PCI Compliance? by Tensor · · Score: 1

      yeah ... not so much
      https://www.pcisecuritystandards.org/participation/member_list.html?group=2&region=0&perpage=0

      as you can see there are lots of airlines on the list ... and Sabre Holdings (the originator of this information in particular) is listed.

  16. As a person with a greencard by OzPeter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The DHS knows a shitload more about than just my travel records. And I had to pay a shitload of money for the privilege.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:As a person with a greencard by microbox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At least somebody is keeping the records in order. A FOI request may be useful for when you want to write your autobiography.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    2. Re:As a person with a greencard by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So the only question remaining is: WHY?? I mean are there no better places in the whole world to go? Perhaps even some place with friendly people and fair jobs?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:As a person with a greencard by hol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not as a green card holder - do that and they deny you the renewal. An "isolated incident" of course.

      --
      - - - Non Caffeine Drink or Drink Error
    4. Re:As a person with a greencard by kiwimn · · Score: 1

      Haha, I share your pain. Have you ever dealt with the USCIS phone service? I've spent hours on hold there before. USCIS/DHS took electronic fingerprints three separate times during my immigration process. $80 each time from memory. I was on a K1 (marrying a US citizen) and I think we have spent close to $1,000 USD at this point on immigration paperwork (to become a permanent resident). I love how selective service found me within two weeks, but a work permit took 8 months. In New Zealand my wife (girlfriend at the time) walked into immigration, and came out an hour later with a residency document and work permit for about $100 from memory.

    5. Re:As a person with a greencard by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Really? Do you have a link to back that up? I'm going to be adjusting status (i.e. applying for a green card) soon, and I am curious about my border records. Do they really mark on there, "FOIA REQUEST FILED, SCREW THEM OVER"?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  17. Ah! Comrade!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to the United Soviet States of America!

    Don't go away, we know who you are, we know where you live. :-)

  18. Every time I do that I wonder... by wiredog · · Score: 4, Funny

    What if Richard Reid had been the Underwear Bomber instead of the show Bomber?

    1. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What if Richard Reid had been the Underwear Bomber instead of the show Bomber?

      Airports in California would be very popular...Airports in New Jersey, not so much.

    2. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Daver297 · · Score: 1

      was he the "Show Bomber"? I thought it was something about his "Shoes"

      --
      -Daver
    3. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buttplug bomber?

    4. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    5. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by ZekoMal · · Score: 1

      It's a little known fact that Richard Reid only put the bombs in his shoes to try and stop the terrible shows he was forced to watch.

    6. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by bhima · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In Atlanta, Ga I was pulled out of the line for an airport security, threatened and subjected to scrutiny which can only be characterized as "harassment"... for making this exact comment.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    7. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "No, Ma'am, the [Department of Homeland Security] do not have a sense of humor we are aware of."

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    8. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's always seemed strange to me that when people think of the shoe bomber, they think of Richard Reid instead of the guy that actually succeeded.

    9. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the number of fat asses in California I doubt that would be the case. At least not unless you're into that "BBW" shit.

    10. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by hypnolizard · · Score: 1

      Send a division of bimbos, with the new DHS undress code, and both the Taliban and Al Qaeda will find a better pursuit of life - leaving the rest of us dressed.

      --
      "Old bag" has more than one meaning.
    11. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a common misconception. He was given the name after singing Andrew Lloyd Webber tunes as he tried to go through customs.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    12. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 1

      I have often wondered about this myself -- and I have decided that the day they uncover the Butt-Bomber, I am no longer flying. I mean, they already do it figuratively, how long until they literally have a box of latex gloves and a tube of KY at the security check point?

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    13. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      Then he'd feel like me watching a Shakira video.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    14. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      A guy in front of me in the line in Tampa was threatened that he might be going somewhere he didn't plan on, and staying longer than he wanted to, if the plastic ziploc baggie his 3oz toiletries were in was larger than the regulation 1 qt. size.

      I almost laughed it was so stupid, but I felt like making my flight.

      --
      This space available.
    15. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by rcamans · · Score: 1

      Then I guess some of us would have to start wearing underwear

      --
      wake up and hold your nose
    16. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      "How about a bomb anecdote? You know, no punch line, just a really cute story. Are they prepared to make that distinction? I think not!" - George Carlin

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    17. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If you uttered the word "bomber" aloud, in any context whatsoever, while standing in an airport security line, then you're not very bright.

    18. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by ArcCoyote · · Score: 1

      1) If you did try to put a bomb in your tighty whiteys, some part of it would trigger the metal detector. The TSA's reason for why you have to take off your shoes is so they can x-ray for all kinds of stuff. (I know for a fact the archway metal detectors don't reliably pick up metal near the floor, and I've noticed the personnel don't wand all the way down.)

      2) Bombers have successfully concealed and detonated explosives a lot more.. ahem.. intimately than in their underwear. The problem with that is the bomber's body tends to absorb much of the blast.

      3) I found ATL security to be quite nice.. however...

      4) Airport security has heard that joke so many times it's gotten annoying.

    19. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The TSA's reason for why you have to take off your shoes is so they can x-ray for all kinds of stuff. (I know for a fact the archway metal detectors don't reliably pick up metal near the floor, and I've noticed the personnel don't wand all the way down.)

      Last time I was in India (Oct of 2001), they were using a standard metal detector with a two stair step in the center that raised you up enough to check your feet without requiring you to remove your shoes. Its probably too simple a solution for the U.S. though.

    20. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by evil_aar0n · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who said anything about "KY"? This is America - we don't play nice.

      --
      Truth, Justice. Or the American Way.
    21. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Funny

      I know we sometimes stretch the word "terrorist" way too far, but in this case it's 100% apt.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    22. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My girlfriend had to take off her bra at the Vancouver airport the other day because it was an under-wire. Airport security has gone too far.

    23. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, taking off your shoes isn't exactly dependent on some patented expensive technology, either.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    24. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they are not checking your shoes for JUST metal, they are checking it for explosives or anything dangerous. As ridiculous as it is, their version of the problem can not be solved by a simple metal detector.

    25. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by ArcCoyote · · Score: 1

      AC has a good point. Which is why they are trying the new millimeter-wave scanners. "That might be a blurry body part" issues aside, mmw should allow keeping shoes on.

      I'm torn on the whole shoe-removal issue. You really CAN hide a lot of bad things in shoes... So part of me says shoe checks should have been procedure long before Reid, but that same part of me says we should have a way to do it without the slow-down of removal already.

    26. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by osgeek · · Score: 1

      Don't try to be funny with airport security. Ever. Smiling is allowed, though.

    27. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, taking off your shoes isn't exactly dependent on some patented expensive technology, either.

      It does, however, increase the time it takes a person to go through by roughly an order of magnitude.

    28. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Scuse me, Sir, that big plane over on the runway there, is it a military transport plane?
      No? What is it then?

    29. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by arth1 · · Score: 1

      1) If you did try to put a bomb in your tighty whiteys, some part of it would trigger the metal detector. The TSA's reason for why you have to take off your shoes is so they can x-ray for all kinds of stuff. (I know for a fact the archway metal detectors don't reliably pick up metal near the floor, and I've noticed the personnel don't wand all the way down.)

      And it's a pain when you have high quality shoes with real nails and a metal plate between the heel and the arch.

    30. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "What if Richard Reid had been the Underwear Bomber instead of the show Bomber?"

      No big deal...just go 'commando'.

      I've been doing it for years...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    31. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "It does, however, increase the time it takes a person to go through by roughly an order of magnitude."

      Nah, just wear flip flops when flying. I now 'dress' for flying to cause the last amount of hangup and hassle. Flip flops for shoes, before going through, I put my wallet, bracelet, phone...etc. in my backpack rather than in my pockets so as not to have anything that will set off the metal detector. I also now make sure to wear shorts/pants that don'e have a lot of metal buttons or zippers on them.

      This is all a PITA, that I do not believe will save us from anything, but, as long as it is on place, it helps to dress smartly for the experience.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    32. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by PoopMonkey · · Score: 1

      They know that since there are so many overweight people they'd complain about having to walk up any steps.

    33. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by magus_melchior · · Score: 1

      I don't remember if DHS personnel are at those checkpoints, but I'm pretty sure that if DHS people are akin to the FBI, TSA agents (the people who actually work the checkpoints) are the reject cops who get assigned to school security.

      The only thing worse than a bad cop is a reject cop who thinks he ought to get a cop's job-- inevitably, someone gives the reject a cop's job and he goes to town on the public.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    34. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

      That might work well in India where all the people are 5 feet 2 but if I tried to walk through a "standard metal detector" that had steps I'd bang my head on the top of it. It would be better to just make the damn things actually work properly.

      --
      "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
    35. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah...why resort to tchnology to solve a safety issue and lose out on a chance to possibly embarass someone in public.
      After all...embarassment in front of your peers is a stronger force to keep the masses in line than threats!

    36. Re:Every time I do that I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tip - do not say bomb while in line. They have signs saying that. They frown on that.

  19. lucky by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I'm glad I've only ever used offshore booking agents.

  20. Other nuggets by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like he went Tampa to London via Houston (used to be Intercontinental) and then mysteriously flew from Charles DeGaulle in Paris back to Tampa via Newark. (Hmmmmmm.. what of the missing segment? Hmm? Hmm?!!!)

    Seat numbers are clearly visible at the end of each flight segment as well.

    The history of every PNR (personal name record) has ALWAYS been tracked by CRS systems.

    Looks like the flights he was scheduled for had some schedule changes and his seat had to be changed also.

    Certainly does a lot of international travel huh?

    Customs and Immigration has always been interested in suspicious behavior though.

    1. Fly to South America and pay cash for your ticket? Expect to be stopped at re-entry
    2. Didn't eat your meal on the way back from Central or South America? Expect to be stopped at re-entry
    3. Fly international more than twice a month? Expect to be stopped at re-entry


    It's good ole profiling at it's best and there's nothing you can do about it. It's a "national security" issue. I speak from experience. I have been stopped 30 consecutive times on international flights. Every flight I ever took until that passport was renewed.

    1. Re:Other nuggets by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 4, Informative

      Looks like he went Tampa to London via Houston (used to be Intercontinental) and then mysteriously flew from Charles DeGaulle in Paris back to Tampa via Newark. (Hmmmmmm.. what of the missing segment? Hmm? Hmm?!!!)

      They have these crazy things in Europe called "trains" that connect city centres without having to hang around in an unfashionable suburb for a few hours waiting to be put into a metal tube. You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

    2. Re:Other nuggets by ahankinson · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but even your European superiority wouldn't make a train travel from Houston to Paris.

    3. Re:Other nuggets by russotto · · Score: 1

      They have these crazy things in Europe called "trains" that connect city centres without having to hang around in an unfashionable suburb for a few hours waiting to be put into a metal tube. You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

      You do, however, have to go through passport control ("E.U., schmee-you, that's what we say -- Gordon Brown") to take a train between London and Paris, so I'm surprised the missing segment isn't shown.

    4. Re:Other nuggets by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1
    5. Re:Other nuggets by nomadic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They have these crazy things in Europe called "trains" that connect city centres without having to hang around in an unfashionable suburb for a few hours waiting to be put into a metal tube. You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

      Silly Europeans always have such a skewed sense of geography. Newark to Tampa is 1,000 miles, exactly. It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

    6. Re:Other nuggets by ndege · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

      ...yet.

      --
      Sig Return: 204 No Content
    7. Re:Other nuggets by oldspewey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2. Didn't eat your meal on the way back from Central or South America? Expect to be stopped at re-entry

      The flight crew on your average longhaul flight do not give a flying fuck what you eat, whether you eat, or how much untouched food you leave on your tray. They are not logging everybody's mealtime performance on some secret touchscreen in the forward galley.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    8. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you bother to look, you'll see direct flight costs from Tampa to Gatwick are far dearer than making stops along the way. The reason is BA have a monopoly on the route and prices vary more than a politician's opinion. Our last tickets were just over $1100/each two months ago. If we didn't have a small child and a baby, we'd go via NY or Dulles bringing the ticket costs down substantially. Unfortunately the stops can introduce several hours of waiting at airports, something anyone with young kids will tell you is a nightmare. You can end up with some very odd routing if you're trying to keep costs to a minimum, or if you want to travel around on flexible tickets, assuming you don't mind being bumped if flights are full. When you travel long flights, you'll invariable see backpackers and students doing this. But doing so can get your flights under $300.

    9. Re:Other nuggets by 16Chapel · · Score: 1

      "Tampa to London via Houston"
      "from Charles DeGaulle in Paris back to Tampa via Newark"

      That's taking a plane from Tampa to London, a train / ferry from London to Paris, then a plane from Paris back to Newark.

      It's called an Open-Jaw return, and is really quite common.

    10. Re:Other nuggets by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      No but according to the GGP the missing segment was london to paris.

      That is a journey that could be made in a whole range of ways, it could have been flown but not shown up in the record because of the fact it was completely outside the US. It could also have been done by train as the GP mentioned or it could even have been done by road (with a short peice on a train or boat to get accross the channel)

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    11. Re:Other nuggets by 16Chapel · · Score: 1

      oops, I meant a plane back from Paris to Tampa.

      Seems I can't read an itinerary myself, at least not after a pub lunch....

    12. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do, however, have to go through passport control ("E.U., schmee-you, that's what we say -- Gordon Brown") to take a train between London and Paris, so I'm surprised the missing segment isn't shown.

      I don't think so. I've been in London (from France) a couple times and have never owned a passport.

    13. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silly Americans always have such a skewed reading comprehension. The missing segment was London to Paris, which is only 2h15 by train.

    14. Re:Other nuggets by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Or, he could have booked a flight on RyanAir same-day, and because neither leg of the voyage touched U.S. soil, it wouldn't have been any of the DHS's business.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    15. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

      On American trains, maybe. On European trains is more like a five and a half hour ride

    16. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe on your old infrastructure.. it would be about 5 hours on a TGV though, ie total trip would be pretty much same as flying once you've included trip to airport, security checks etc.

    17. Re:Other nuggets by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Silly Europeans always have such a skewed sense of geography. Newark to Tampa is 1,000 miles, exactly. It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

      That doesn't sound right. That sounds like a local train service not an intercity one.

      I regularly do journeys by train:
      17 miles commuter service - 17 to 22 minutes depending on whether it's non stop, one extra stop or two extra stops.
      250 miles intercity service - 2h50m to 3h15

      St Pancras (London) to Marseille is reported as 6h15 mins including crossing Paris. I'm not sure of the exact distance but it's getting on for 1000 miles (probably nearer 800). I've never actually done this journey although I have done Waterloo - Nimes and it's infinitely preferable to taking a plane. By the time you've done the two hours in the airport thing, the journey to and from the airport at each end etc it's not even significantly slower than taking the train.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    18. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try building faster trains

    19. Re:Other nuggets by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      If you picked an honest comparison, you'd look at the one area of the US passenger rail network that Amtrak has complete control over, namely Boston to DC corridor. There the Acela times are comparable to flying if you factor in the time needed to get to the airport / station, get through security, wait for boarding, get a cab, and get to where you're going.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    20. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have these crazy things in Europe called "trains" that connect city centres without having to hang around in an unfashionable suburb for a few hours waiting to be put into a metal tube. You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

      Silly Europeans always have such a skewed sense of geography. Newark to Tampa is 1,000 miles, exactly. It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

      Silly Americans don't understand the point of the comment - the bit between London and Paris.

    21. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am an Australian citizen who has been officially homeless for about two years now. I travel constantly for contract work and chill out with friends in the in-between weeks, or months, when I'm not living in hotels.

      Returning to Australia from a four day trip to London is a nightmare because I'm homeless (Australian Immigration demands a home address for citizens leaving or returning to Australia) "what do you mean, you don't live anywhere..." and I'm self employed, "how did you pay for this trip?" ...grrr...

      In contrast, visiting the USA as a guest on the Visa Waiver Program is actually a piece of cake, I just rock up and they let me stay for 90 days without any dramas or too many questions, it's tops. I have a nicer time passing US immigration than I do entering Australia as an Australian citizen.

      Has anyone seen the stupid TV show "Border Security: Australia's Front Line"? It's all about Australian customs idiots harassing the shit out of innocent travelers. Most of their "stories" are along the lines of, "this ethnic looking character is behaving strangely...we'd better lock them up for four hours, harass them, and then let them go. Phew, good thing we did that, they _may_ have been smuggling something."

      Yes, Australia has a fragile environment that must be protected. Yes, AQIS generally does a really good. Are all of customs a complete pack of cunts? Abso-fucking-lutely!

      Ash

    22. Re:Other nuggets by nomadic · · Score: 1

      There the Acela times are comparable to flying if you factor in the time needed to get to the airport / station, get through security, wait for boarding, get a cab, and get to where you're going.

      True, especially now that Amtrak has lowered its Acela prices to amounts that only border on insanity rather than fall squarely over the crazytown border. But for long distance, air travel in the US tends to be far cheaper, faster, and easier.

    23. Re:Other nuggets by nomadic · · Score: 1

      That doesn't sound right. That sounds like a local train service not an intercity one.

      Actually you're right, I just checked and it's actually LONGER from NYC to Tampa.

      St Pancras (London) to Marseille is reported as 6h15 mins including crossing Paris. I'm not sure of the exact distance but it's getting on for 1000 miles (probably nearer 800). I've never actually done this journey although I have done Waterloo - Nimes and it's infinitely preferable to taking a plane.

      Ahhh, you're European. We don't have trains as fast, for many reasons. One is European countries are smaller, so it's less expensive to lay all that track. A corollary of that is there's less public insistence on high-speed trains. And of course, it probably does help your transportation infrastructure budget when the U.S. taxpayers subsidize your defense spending, but I digress.

      According to the geobytes web page (not swearing to its accuracy), it is exactly 623 miles. Extrapolating that, it would take your London-Marseille train 10 hours to go 1000 miles.

      And most of the times I've gone from London to the continent I've used trains exclusively, but mostly because some cretin decided to put Heathrow and Luton too far from London to get back and forth easily.

    24. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to read something else:

      Tampa->Houston->London: by air

      London->Paris: the missing segment

      Paris->Newark->Tampa: by air

      They dug a tunnel a while ago, and since then you can get a train from London to Paris. One that goes 300 km/h (160 km/h in the tunnel), if I'm not mistaken. I remember those speeds from the Brussels-London connection. It really is a matter of a few hours, without all the hassle you get at airports.

    25. Re:Other nuggets by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      In general, no, but I have heard it claimed before that on flights from Latin America to the US they're required to report people who don't eat or drink anything, because one possible reason is that their stomachs are full of condoms containing cocaine.

    26. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? The missing segment is London to Paris.

    27. Re:Other nuggets by CyberDave · · Score: 2, Informative

      Silly commenters always have such a skewed sense of reading comprehension. The trips were:

      Tampa - Houston - London
      Paris (CDG) - Newark - Tampa

      The "missing segment" is how the traveler got to Paris from London without flying, not from Newark to Tampa The answer, of course, is a train (ever hear of the Chunnel?)

    28. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The moral: never swallow so many condoms full of cocaine that there's no room left for a light snack.

    29. Re:Other nuggets by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      2. Didn't eat your meal on the way back from Central or South America? Expect to be stopped at re-entry

      Whoa, how do they know that? The flight attendants would have to keep track somehow.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    30. Re:Other nuggets by Tensor · · Score: 1

      Silly Americans think people only talk about the US...

      He meant he took the train from London to Paris .... NOT Newark to Tampa ... as that segment is not missing in the PNR, the LGW or LHR to CDG is.

      On the other hand referring to planes as metal tubes vs trains is ironic to say the least.

    31. Re:Other nuggets by Tensor · · Score: 1

      Not only that ... what is most suspicious is that he flew to London but stayed at the Marriot in COSTA RICA !! and in the Sheraton in San Salvador ....

      This would be an ideal candidate to flag as a terrorist :)

    32. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your trains go 50 mph? No wonder you prefer to fly...

    33. Re:Other nuggets by srvivn21 · · Score: 1

      Looks like he went Tampa to London via Houston (used to be Intercontinental) and then mysteriously flew from Charles DeGaulle in Paris back to Tampa via Newark. (Hmmmmmm.. what of the missing segment? Hmm? Hmm?!!!)

      They have these crazy things in Europe called "trains" that connect city centres without having to hang around in an unfashionable suburb for a few hours waiting to be put into a metal tube. You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

      Silly Europeans always have such a skewed sense of geography. Newark to Tampa is 1,000 miles, exactly. It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

      Tampa->Houston->London [missing segment] Paris->Newark->Tampa

      Newark to Tampa was a plane ride. London to Paris was the "missing segment" and is a very manageable 214 miles with a 1st class ticket price available from 99GBP.

    34. Re:Other nuggets by Atiniir · · Score: 1

      Silly Europeans always have such a skewed sense of geography. Newark to Tampa is 1,000 miles, exactly. It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

      Not sure how this was modded insightful. I mean, yeah, that's a long train ride, but the poster who was describing trains in an overly elaborate manner was making a quite accurate reference to the "missing" distance between London and Paris on the travel itinerary (a distance equating to roughly 212 miles - or 342 km since they use the painfully logical metric system across the pond). The "Silly European" was clearly not suggesting that the traveler took a train from Newark to Tampa.

    35. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Train technology has come a long way since the late 19th century. The latest TGV can go 1000 miles in under 3 hours at top speed, and there's no intrusive bullshit or hours of waiting on either end.

    36. Re:Other nuggets by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      They have these crazy things in Europe called "trains" that connect city centres without having to hang around in an unfashionable suburb for a few hours waiting to be put into a metal tube. You don't even have to take your shoes off to get on them.

      Silly Europeans always have such a skewed sense of geography. Newark to Tampa is 1,000 miles, exactly. It's a two and a half hour flight and a 20 hour train ride.

      He's talking about London-Paris, not Newark-Tampa.

      (And you got three people modding you "insightful". Definitely too many Americans with mod points.)

    37. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And of course, it probably does help your transportation infrastructure budget when the U.S. taxpayers subsidize your defense spending, but I digress.

      Cute. We don't want your military. Really. We don't.

    38. Re:Other nuggets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really?? Insightful?? Did you read the fucking flight plan? Remind me never to let you arrange any travel for me.

        For the record London - Paris approx 308 miles and 2hours 15 min on Eurostar.

    39. Re:Other nuggets by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Cute. We don't want your military. Really. We don't.

      You sure wanted it during WW2 and the cold war. And if you don't want it now, please, vote in a government that asks the US to leave; otherwise you DO want it.

    40. Re:Other nuggets by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I was responding more to the snide "we have these things called 'trains' in Europe" rather than the specific situation he was applying it to.

  21. Unfortunately, nothing new... by shrtcircuit · · Score: 5, Informative

    I worked for a large company post-9/11 with fingers in most major industries, including a significant presence in travel (whether you knew it or not). Part of the data collection they did was essentially building profiles of everyone, including all of the information this guy obtained. The government couldn't legally collect the data, but being a private corporation, this place could. Naturally collecting all of that is really only useful for spying on people, so there was never any real doubt as to what happened to it. The rabbit hole goes a fair bit deeper into what you do and how that information is linked, and that was all just at this one company.

    1. Re:Unfortunately, nothing new... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is what irks me. The government is forbidden to keep databases of this type, so they contract it out (F U Milton Friedmann!) then make their queries against a database that isn't under their direct control. Such a total abuse of the law.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Unfortunately, nothing new... by KiwiSurfer · · Score: 1

      What does Milton Friedman have to do with this?

    3. Re:Unfortunately, nothing new... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      The privatization of government services for a perceived savings in cost and efficiency. You know, because the government is so incompetent and private industry is so good.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    4. Re:Unfortunately, nothing new... by Espressor · · Score: 1

      Here in the UK our wonderful government outsources the implementation of its wonderful data retention policies to "contractors". A lot of private data about a huge number of people in the UK got lost in the wild, stolen or otherwise, in recent years. Subcontracting enables the government to shift the blame. How convenient. Somehow subcontracting enables some to get rid of their accountability.

    5. Re:Unfortunately, nothing new... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

      You also invariably end up paying more because the private sector is trying to suck profit out as well as provide a service. And, by nature the government becomes vendor-locked, which the private sector uses to leverage even higher returns.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  22. UGH!! by exunil · · Score: 1

    I am SOOO going to figure out a way to live with some privacy.

    1. Re:UGH!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not start by posting anonymously?

    2. Re:UGH!! by mianne · · Score: 1

      Okay, first off, destroy all your credit cards, shopper loyalty cards, library cards, driver license, etc. Disconnect your telephone, and throw your cellphone away. Best bet is to douse your entire home in a chemical accelerant and set it ablaze to hopefully destroy 99.95% of your DNA residue. Next, you should stowaway about a freighter headed across the Pacific. When reasonably close and when no one is looking, dive overboard and swim toward an atoll. As researching uninhabited islands will leave too many bread crumbs, you're going to have to take the luck of the draw on which one though, be it inhabited, irradiated from nuclear bomb tests, has edible flora or fauna, or be it a research or military base of sorts.

      If you succeed and survive the journey and you are able to find a way to locate, trap, and prepare food to eat along with many other necessities of life, then you will have regained some privacy. However it may be fleeting as any fires, shelters or other evidence of your presence may be spotted by sea or by air at any time. And even in the best case scenario, you'd lose all contact with family and friends, the internet, electricity, indoor plumbing, and news of the world outside of your new home.

      Otherwise, expect nearly everything you do in the modern world, even things as mundane as flipping a light switch will be compiled into individual databases, and in turn, aggregated in a massive psychographic profile allowing certain government and private entities far more insight into your daily routine and habits than you are likely aware of possessing yourself.

      --
      Javascript, cookies, flash, and ActiveX must be enabled in order to view this sig.
    3. Re:UGH!! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      As researching uninhabited islands will leave too many bread crumbs

      Research it from a laptop hooked up to a public Wi-Fi point with a spoofed MAC address taken from a stranger's computer while running a Linux LiveCD...but don't do anything else or cookies and Flash LSOs could blow your cover.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:UGH!! by exunil · · Score: 1

      Okay, first off, destroy all your credit cards, shopper loyalty cards, library cards, driver license, etc. Disconnect your telephone, and throw your cellphone away. Best bet is to douse your entire home in a chemical accelerant and set it ablaze to hopefully destroy 99.95% of your DNA residue. Next, you should stowaway about a freighter headed across the Pacific. When reasonably close and when no one is looking, dive overboard and swim toward an atoll. As researching uninhabited islands will leave too many bread crumbs, you're going to have to take the luck of the draw on which one though, be it inhabited, irradiated from nuclear bomb tests, has edible flora or fauna, or be it a research or military base of sorts.

      If you succeed and survive the journey and you are able to find a way to locate, trap, and prepare food to eat along with many other necessities of life, then you will have regained some privacy. However it may be fleeting as any fires, shelters or other evidence of your presence may be spotted by sea or by air at any time. And even in the best case scenario, you'd lose all contact with family and friends, the internet, electricity, indoor plumbing, and news of the world outside of your new home.

      Otherwise, expect nearly everything you do in the modern world, even things as mundane as flipping a light switch will be compiled into individual databases, and in turn, aggregated in a massive psychographic profile allowing certain government and private entities far more insight into your daily routine and habits than you are likely aware of possessing yourself.

      ha ha lol. i ment SOME privacy. An i use zfone on my cell phone

  23. If you have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Done nothing wrong, then you have nothing to hide and worry aboot...

    WAIT !!?? credit card number and expiry date ? wtf !!??

    Since when did it become acceptable to monitor everybody in case on is a terrorist instead of only the potential suspects ?

    How on earth this level of incompetency and waste of ressources is considered state of the art ?

    1. Re:If you have... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Though I am 99% atheist (I occasionally have fantasies of being God and turning people I dislike into pillars of salt or exploding their heads with my mind) I have to say there are amazing similarities between revelations and what we are seeing today. First they get everyone using the same money and/or money networks, then they track them, then they stop those who disagree from using their money completely. Number of the beast.

      Seriously, though. The DHS collecting financial instrument data is more about tracking where the money came from than anything else. Suppose the travel was paid for by "Death to America, Inc"? And while I agree there are aspects that are quite worrisome, I am not terribly worried about it. People have to reveal their "secret numbers" every time they want to use them. It's all part of opting into the system.

      If I had anything to say about it, I'd change the U.S. into a "Mind Your Own Business" nation that disallows meddling in the affairs of other nations by policy and taking care of our own problems at home first! It works pretty well for the Swiss. When we stop pissing off the world, we will have a lot less to worry about from "terrorists" both foreign and domestic.

    2. Re:If you have... by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      It's all part of opting into the system.

      except that opting into the system is mandatory.

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    3. Re:If you have... by Monolith1 · · Score: 1

      When we stop pissing off the world, we will have a lot less to worry about from "terrorists" both foreign and domestic.

      Yes, and I suspect it would be far more effective than all of the other "security measures" nonsense which is put in place to help prop up the imperialism. Seriously, I wish the US would just build a big fence around themselves, stay inside it and do whatever they want. Rather than setting the standard for other scared governments to follow lock step with them.

  24. Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How does the Govt. having this information help the govt. stop terrorism? Anyone?

    1. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by ralf1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A better question might be 'How does ANYTHING that DHS does curb terrorism?'

      --
      "Would you, could you, with a goat?" Dr Seuss
    2. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by hol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It stops terrorism about as well as the Canadian Gun Registry, London CCTV, and the Patriot Acts combined = 0, at least officially according to the General Accounting Office or their countries equivalent. Of course the real number they say, is secret, and zero isn't a real number...

      --
      - - - Non Caffeine Drink or Drink Error
    3. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by tiedyejeremy · · Score: 1

      if they STOPPED terrorism, too many people would be out of work and that would be bad for the business group known as the US Government, so that's not an intent of the DHS.

      --
      Anything you say will be held against you. ... "tits"
    4. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by Skim123 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How does the Govt. having this information help the govt. stop terrorism? Anyone?

      Their job is not to stop terrorism, but rather to make people "feel" safer.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    5. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by ashtophoenix · · Score: 1

      Of course the real number they say, is secret, and zero isn't a real number...

      I would like to know what Brahmagupta would have to say about that!

      --
      Life is about being a Phoenix!
    6. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      zero isn't a real number

      So they're saying the number is imaginary?

      *ducks*

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    7. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by DM9290 · · Score: 1

      How does the Govt. having this information help the govt. stop terrorism? Anyone?

      Their job is not to stop terrorism, but rather to make people "feel" safer.

      And by "feel safer" we really mean "scared shitless".

      --
      No one has a right to their *own* opinion. They have a right to the TRUTH.
    8. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      How does the Govt. having this information help the govt. stop terrorism? Anyone?

      Their job is not to stop terrorism, but rather to make people "feel" safer.

      And by "feel safer" we really mean "scared shitless".

      You can't very well make someone feel safe if they weren't scared in the first place.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    9. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by fbwhrdpmtajg · · Score: 1

      Everything they do makes me feel less safe

    10. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      We don't know and will never know.

      Because, you know, if nothing happens then either all terrorist activities were discovered prevented, or no-one even tried to do an attack. Which may be because of these measures, maybe because of other reasons (no political/religious grudge against the US, for example).

      And if something happens then the measures were ineffective and have to be stepped up.

    11. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      It has to do with getting you to accept more and more incursions into your privacy and getting you to believe that this is normal and reasonable.

    12. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by enrevanche · · Score: 1

      If anything, its purpose is fear, causing you to fear that things are so bad that this is necessary. They do not want you to feel too safe. The more things they "must" do, the more public paranoia there will be.

    13. Re:Question: How does any of this stop terrorism? by Skim123 · · Score: 1

      There was some founding father who said something like, "Those who will sacrifice a little liberty for temporary safety are very cautious people and will live a long and peaceful life." Or something like that.

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  25. And where is the manual... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...which explains all the meanings of the data?

  26. And I could be shot dead too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so how does having a credit card help my corpse?

    1. Re:And I could be shot dead too by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      The billing address lets them know where to mail your remains.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
  27. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by Dan667 · · Score: 1

    Exactly what I was thinking. They had no idea what was going to happen before 9/11 and it is pretty obvious why when you look at stuff like this. Invasion of privacy and a wasted effort all at the same time.

  28. credit card data not safe by dickens · · Score: 1

    What do you bet we have no recourse when they inevitably release all this credit card data to crooks ?

  29. Are they PCI compliant with those #'s? by khasim · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PCI_DSS

    Oh, yeah. The rules are different if you're the government than if you're a regular company.

  30. Here's an update, folks! by Datamonstar · · Score: 0

    The so-called wall that supposed to built to keep illegal immigrants out of our country and away from our jobs does just as good a job at keeping US in! You're not going to get out of this country if they don't want you to.

    --
    The eternal struggle of good vs. evil begins within one's self.
    1. Re:Here's an update, folks! by slykens · · Score: 1

      The so-called wall that supposed to built to keep illegal immigrants out of our country and away from our jobs does just as good a job at keeping US in! You're not going to get out of this country if they don't want you to.

      Huh?

      Unless you're on a no-fly list you're going to able to fly out of the country. There's no outbound passport control in the US.

      And if you're on the no-fly list you're not going anywhere unless you're driving. (Then you could drive to Canada or Mexico)

    2. Re:Here's an update, folks! by hughk · · Score: 1

      Unless you're on a no-fly list you're going to able to fly out of the country. There's no outbound passport control in the US.

      For non-resident aliens, yes. You are supposed to identify yourselves to an INS rep and give him the funger. He will do something with your visa, photograph and fingerprint and give you a receipt to say you legally left the country. Without that, non-res aliens won't be allowed back in.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    3. Re:Here's an update, folks! by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      Unless you're on a no-fly list you're going to able to fly out of the country. There's no outbound passport control in the US.

      And if you're on the no-fly list you're not going anywhere unless you're driving. (Then you could drive to Canada or Mexico)

      Yes, there is. You need a passport to go to Canada or Mexico these days. No passport? You don't get out. They wanna keep you in the US, all they gotta do is cancel your passport. They don't have to give you a reason upfront.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    4. Re:Here's an update, folks! by slykens · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is. You need a passport to go to Canada or Mexico these days. No passport? You don't get out. They wanna keep you in the US, all they gotta do is cancel your passport. They don't have to give you a reason upfront.

      Ah, but you didn't mention cancellation of passports. That's a much larger problem but you could still easily enter Mexico or Canada. There's a few (most?) Mexican border stations that simply don't check documents for people walking across the border to their side.

      As for Canada, there's a lot of back roads protected by nothing but an orange cone most of the night.

      That is one reason why we've been up in arms about who the Canadians let into their country as it is so easy to get from there to here without being detected.

  31. site /.ed google cache of the site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    looks like the site is down due to capacity.

    Here is the Google cache of the site http://tinyurl.com/nrt7rm

  32. Its more than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you get pulled over and they ask you questions where did you go, with whom did you stay, whats your relationship to them - then they all record that into their computers so later you get harassed by some 20 year old highschool drop out in telling you all that information before you go to USA just to show off how much they know about you.

      By the way, does one has to answer those personal questions to enter USA if you ARE US citizen?

     

  33. meal preferences by hey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Do they flag:
    kosher = maybe friend
    halal = terrorist
    vegan = hippie scum

    1. Re:meal preferences by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      There's a passage in the Qur'an which stipulates that a muslim may impersonate the enemy in order to defeat him, to paraphrase horribly. Alcohol is fine, non-halal meat is fine, cutting your hair is fine, as long as you're doing it to defeat the West.

      Or so their organisers tell them.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:meal preferences by bikehorn · · Score: 1

      There's a passage in the Qur'an which stipulates that a muslim may impersonate the enemy in order to defeat him, to paraphrase horribly. Alcohol is fine, non-halal meat is fine, cutting your hair is fine, as long as you're doing it to defeat the West. Or so their organisers tell them.

      Really? Citation please? Especially the part where it says it's alright to do it "to defeat the west" ?

    3. Re:meal preferences by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      I'm looking. It may take time, as I don't own any religious texts, but I'll find the passage and quote it.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:meal preferences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, that is sooo Last Administration (Bush).

      Under Obama, they flag:
      kosher = Zionist scum
      halal = VIP
      vegan = maybe Comrade

  34. Well, if you don't have anything to hide... by CyberPhart · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've actually heard people respond to revelations like this by saying, "If you're not doing anything wrong, why are you worried about the government having this information?" I then ask "Really? Well, tell me all about your sex life..no?..are you engaging in some perversion?" or "How much money have you got in the bank?...Why won't you tell me? Are you laundering money for drug dealers?" I don't know which is worse, these clowns prying into our lives or our wonderful Congress sitting there and letting them do it. Big Brother is taking over faster than you doublethink.

    1. Re:Well, if you don't have anything to hide... by nilbog · · Score: 1

      After explaining the NSA's secret data collection rooms to my father, he gave me the same reasoning. "Well I don't search for anything bad on the Internet, so I have nothing to worry about." I turned to his computer and started saying out loud and typing at the same time; "HOW TO MAKE BOMBS THAT WILL BLOW UP LARGE BUILDINGS."

      He started yelling "No! Don't search for that!"

      For some reason he still didn't see the problem there.

      --
      or else!
    2. Re:Well, if you don't have anything to hide... by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      I always respond even more ominously:

      What if you do have something to hide?

      There are tens of thousands of laws on the books, and many of them are illegal. We cannot follow every law, all the time.

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    3. Re:Well, if you don't have anything to hide... by secondLife · · Score: 1

      "People" are exactly correct: The only ones that need to worry are those going on molestation vacation, cheating on their partners, closet gays, criminals and liars. I will tell you about my sex life, my wife and I have sex when ever we feel like it. Yes, I have 200k in the bank and I might be laundering drug money, check it out. I also own and carry weapons and have a permit to do so. What's your problem? You a child molester?

    4. Re:Well, if you don't have anything to hide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing....

  35. Not a big deal... by slykens · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I'm out of the loop but I don't see anything here that's outrageous.

    It looks like CBP received a dump of your PNR from the airline, period. Any data that's stored in that PNR will be transmitted when it's dumped. Whoopty-fookin-do. It's the AIRLINE that has all this information to begin with.

    As for the CBP internal records it makes sense they would track when/where your passport shows up. I know my passport details have either been manually entered or scanned in and out of most countries I've been in. (Or a backend transmittal occurred from the airline to passport control in that country to indicate I was departing)

    Whilst the "big brother" connotation of this is troubling it is not as if CBP went out and GATHERED all this information on its own from various sources. They ask the airline for a dump of the PNR, the airline gives it to them. Since you booked everything into one PNR they got it all.

    If anything here the airline is not taking appropriate steps to safeguard your data. I'd bitch at them before I'd get worked up with DHS. (Not saying I wouldn't get worked up with DHS too but I'd start at the source of the data)

  36. Does it affect who wins on American Idol? by hyades1 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Too bad most of the sheeple will just yawn and pick their noses when they're told about this. People with enough sense to be nervous about this level of government intrusion into the lives of law-abiding citizens will be laughed at.

    And if I hear one more idiot say, "If you aren't doing anything wrong, what are you worried about", I'm going to invite the cowardly moron to move to Communist China, where he'll feel right at home.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Does it affect who wins on American Idol? by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wouldn't say that. Republicans have become increasingly concerned about the expanding power of the Executive branch now that they think the powers given to Bush might be used *against* them.

      --
      I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    2. Re:Does it affect who wins on American Idol? by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the chuckle. You gave me one of those, shake-my-head-and-say-Damned-if-he-isn't-right moments.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  37. Not just the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My wife and I travelled to Russia and they required visa's as well. If you don't speak Russian, it'll cost you about $250/person to get them.

    1. Re:Not just the US by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      What? I just applied. It was 25EU + 25EU for the agency that I went though.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  38. I for one ... by srobert · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome ... oh wait, this is for real?

  39. Awesome for green card applications! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is great! I was going to apply for a green card soon and I believe you have to list every time you've entered and left the US. I'll just put through an FOIA request and the government can do the work for me!

  40. Your credit card is just as personal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or do you not own your credit card? It's as much yours as a piece of paper with your address printed on it is personal.

  41. slashdotted by xkcdFan1011011101111 · · Score: 1

    looks like TFA has been slashdotted...

  42. Value Added: Information NOT Stored by RobBebop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the point that highlights why this is all security theater is the note at the way bottom of the record which says Private Jet Travel was not included in the documentation. It seems this is a hole in their security model that will never be plugged.

    --
    Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    1. Re:Value Added: Information NOT Stored by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I fly on a commercial carrier it *IS* private jet travel. The airline is a private company and I am a private citizen. I conduct a business transaction with the airline and they fly me to where I want to go. If I charter a jet for a personal trip then they don't keep records? Obviously there are some 4th amendment issues here which may never be satisfactorily resolved.

    2. Re:Value Added: Information NOT Stored by ProfFalcon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, of course not. That would infringe on rich people's rights. That would be crazy!

      --
      Simply stating [Citation Needed] does not automatically make you insightful or brilliant.
  43. Federal law to "blame" by ChePibe · · Score: 1

    The US already collects vasts amount of information as part of the visa application process for any foreign national, all paid by the applicant.

    This is the result of federal statute, not some evil recent regulation.

    Federal law requires that immigration costs be funded by the immigrant rather than the U.S. Taxpayer. On the one hand, it is very off-putting to many potential immigrants. On the other hand, one must ask why American citizens should be forced to pay the immigration costs of some non-citizen to which the U.S. owes no obligation and has yet to receive any benefit from. It also serves as a valuable tool for weeding out those who could never afford to go in any case.

    And, as to Chile, it's noteworthy that U.S. citizens arriving in Chile are charged a reciprocal tourist visa fee of exactly that $131 as well. Chile believes in reciprocity, and that's fine - Chile's a great place to live and visit. I've lived there myself.

    1. Re:Federal law to "blame" by cenc · · Score: 1

      I have lived in Chile for years. As far as I can tell the gringos are getting the bargain. I keep telling Chileans going the other direction it is just not worth $131.

  44. That's why I pay with cash by sonnejw0 · · Score: 1

    That and because Dave Ramsey is frickin' awesome like Chuck Norris.

  45. Disband the DHS! by wilhelm · · Score: 1

    Yet another reason the DHS should be disbanded. You know, beside the half-billion other reasons. The RIAA treats their customers this way, and it got them everylasting scorn and loss of a non-trivial amount of their customer base. The government treats their customers this way (let's face it, we're no longer citizens, we're customers), and there is absolutely nothing we can do. If we speak out, we're labelled as "unamerican", and subject to a host of more intrusive measures, from which we also have no recourse. Habeas corpus be damned! Fourth amendment be damned!

    I refuse to get on a plane in the US until they're gone... so that means I'm probably not going to fly again in my lifetime.

  46. Yup, check it out! by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    Stainless steel RFID-blocking passport holder: http://www.thinkgeek.com/homeoffice/gear/a7a2/

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  47. Ahh Slashdot by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    News for paranoid cynics.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  48. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by rcamans · · Score: 1

    Going to? You speak as if it is a FUTURE event. I aready have all your credit card info, and everything else as well. Muhahah.

    --
    wake up and hold your nose
  49. The point is the implicit bigotry in the stories. by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    Stories, generally posted by Americans, about UK CCTV schemes are often accompanied by text that states more or less explicitly, "Oh, those freedom-hating Brits! Thank God it doesn't happen here." Yet when the Americans implement even worse systems they (for some reason) don't choose to blame the entire nation for them.

    It would be nice if posters could direct their ire to the place where it belongs, namely the people responsible for these policies, rather than the citizenry as a whole.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  50. You forgot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And charge the bill for cleanup :)

  51. Funny thing is by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    I read all of the none Americans gripping about America and all this procedures. Yet, back in the 70 and 80, Germany, Spain, France, Israel, etc. had issues with terrorists and implemented FAR FAR harsher procedures. When traveling through Germany, you would see uzis on police. Do the wrong thing and they were all over you. And that was in West Germany, not East (my understanding is that it was even worse there). Heck, if you live in various areas of Mexico, India, China, etc, you still see guards running around and grab you if you LOOK wrong at them, or if you are the wrong color (literally).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Funny thing is by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I read all of the none Americans gripping about America and all this procedures. Yet, back in the 70 and 80, Germany, Spain, France, Israel, etc. had issues with terrorists and implemented FAR FAR harsher procedures.

      So, are you generally mocking non-Americans for being hypocrites, or are you saying that it's OK for the DHS to be like they are because the Stasi was worse...?

    2. Re:Funny thing is by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Mocking non-Americans for knocking relatively minor items? No. I am openly saying that they ARE hypocrites. Many of these same ppl live in countries far far worse than America.

      I know that nations take extreme actions when they are under attack. Shoots, We quietly have a number of officers carrying much bigger weapons to deal with this. And I am not wild about what is going on. It is ALL AMERICANS RESPONSIBILITY to fight back against the taking of rights (trading freedoms for security). But, I am amazed at the number of non-Americans that carp about us, while ignoring their own nation's actions. Even now, UK, Germany and France quietly carry far more information about all citizens and aliens in their nations.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  52. Yes, but... by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Are they keeping track of the fact that the woman using the companion ticket discount and accompanying me isn't really my wife?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  53. Donning my foil hat by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    Suppose that they only want people willing to go through x amount of bullshit in submission to authority...

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    1. Re:Donning my foil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suppose that they only want people willing to go through x amount of bullshit in submission to authority...
      --
      http://wikileaks.org/wiki/My_life_in_child_porn

      Presumably you put this link into your signature because you wanted to draw attention to it. It's a fairly safe bet that more people will be willing to click on said link if you change "http://wikileaks.org/" to "https://secure.wikileaks.org/", thereby doing a better job of drawing attention to it.

  54. Easy solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    1. Don't travel to any other country.

    2. Don't use air travel ever.

    Since all this foolishness started I've saved a lot of money I would have been spending as a tourist and I don't get harassed by goons because I carry a Swiss Army knife in my pocket. Not to mention the chances of my falling from the sky in pieces is now zero.

  55. Damn. You've found my Secret Identity by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Typo-Man, arch-nemesis of Preview-Boy.

  56. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This information is not fully correct. As mentioned before, the screenshot comes from the airline reservation system or one of GDS ( Global Delivery System) screens. Airlines only rely traveler names, gender and birth dates to DHS to improve upon passenger verification process, and no credit card information is stored.
    GDS systems keep this information for up to 6 months from your travel for historical records

  57. Of course it's real! by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Any rational person knows that!

    1. Re:Of course it's real! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I prefer it to be irrational. I like the idea that draconian measures have solved exactly pi crimes.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  58. Why is this tagged "republicans"? by FiloEleven · · Score: 1

    Sure, Bush's bunch created DHS, but Obama's crew is keeping it alive and well. Do the democrats get a free pass for inheriting a mess even if they choose to do nothing or make it more onerous?

    I'm not suggesting a "democrats" tag be added, but that whoever tagged it "republicans" needs to think more clearly about the trend of *all* administrations over the past few decades instead of pointing fingers at whichever face of the Party they like least.

  59. 31337 :) by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

    Oh that is too funny. Big Brother knows *everything*.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  60. What the DHS needs to realize is........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what WE THE PEOPLE know about *IT*. See, they work for us. Not the other way around. Ah, whats the use. The second revolution will revamp the government in many ways. Many of these buffoons will have to find regular jobs like the rest of us schmucks and get on normal healthcare, not the gold standard bullshit they refuse to get rid of even IF they're proposing so-called "reformed" healthcare.

    DHS and the rest of the government need to watch it. They're on thin ice with the people.

  61. Germany does the same thing by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    Have to call and pay for an appointment then pay the application fee.

    Now if you are traveling under the visa waiver program you just show up, but if you need a visa or aren't from a VWP country its the same thing for Germany and the USA.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  62. You misunderstand by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Privacy issues such as these have no relationship to Republicans' shortlist of talking points and are therefore totally uninteresting to them.

    Well, maybe if you say that the government can use the data to see who's using tax havens, you could wedge the whole "ZOMG THE GUBMINT IS GOING TO TAX ME (OR MORE IMPORTANTLY OUR WEALTHY CORPORATE OVERLORDS) TOO DEATH!" paranoia in there...

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  63. owned by freight rail by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

    a fair portion of eastern seaboard rail lines are owned by freight companies so they don't have plans to upgrade their rails for higher speed. We have higher speed trains, but they can only run at higher speeds from NYC to boston even though they provide "high speed" service to Washington DC as well. The rest of the system is only rated for around 80mph.

    Oddly enough we were doing around 100mph on the same corridor 100 years ago or so.

    --
    Bring back the old version of slashdot.
  64. It's 20 hours on an American train... by yet-another-lobbyist · · Score: 1

    On a European high-speed train, it's 8 relaxing, uninterrupted hours during which you can get some serious work done, walk around, get a coffee, or a meal in the restaurant. For a realistic comparison, you have to add a 1 hour commute to the airport, 2 hours of wait before the plain actually takes off, 1 hour for the commute from the airport to the place you finally want to be...makes altogether 6.5 hours during which can't get anything done, because you get pushed around from one waiting area to another, have to take off your clothes, get pushed into some small space where you can't actually move at all or stretch your legs, etc. Obviously the benefits just become more overwhelming as you talk about shorter distances (which are typical for Europe).

  65. No prob, dude, check out ThinkGeek. by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    Radiation-proof passport wallet. Ba-da-bing, ba-da-boom.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  66. It COULD, if... by EWAdams · · Score: 1

    ... you didn't exercise the elementary precaution of keeping your thumb over the numbers.

    --
    I piss off bigots.
  67. This is scary as hell - remember COINTELPRO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anybody here remember COINTELPRO and how the govt literally attacked people and groups in order to silence them? Sure some groups might have deserved the extra scrutiny, but many didn't. What is to keep the government from using this information for attacks on people? What if your Joe Hoffman, and suddenly your supposedly a victim of identity theft? Instead of touring the protest circuit, your trying to figure out how to pay off the credit card cartels?

    I know this might seem like an exaggeration, but how much power are we really comfortable in our government having? How much do we trust it to really do the right thing? Is this trust based on truth or our wishful thinking?

    Just some thoughts.

  68. What real Copy? by i*rod · · Score: 1

    Did anyone read/find the article cited? "An error occurred while loading http://www.philosecurity.org/ Unknown host www.philosecurity.org" rws

  69. The terrorist are already living in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe that they live in Washington DC. Or, perhaps now live in Texas.

  70. Separate bookings by bkr1_2k · · Score: 1

    Just one more reason to book flights, hotels, etc in separate bookings. Why give more information than you need to? For that matter, just create the booking then cancel it within the appropriate time and call another directly. Misinformation works for you too.

    --
    "Growing old is inevitable; growing up is optional."
  71. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by Espressor · · Score: 1

    BTW, can someone post a list of vendors of virtual temporary credit cards? A search on the Web didn't lead to much last time. This would obviously be something very useful for Internet purchase safety, if anything (tired of vendors who don't even encrypt account passwords). Why oh why isn't that service more pervasive?

  72. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1

    It's a service that comes with your real credit card. For instance, I have a Citibank-branded MasterCard, and if I log in to the citicards.com website there's a menu item somewhere that lets me generate extra card numbers with various restrictions (only usable at one merchant, $$ limit, time limit, only usable once).

  73. Re:At least the probably don't know how to use it. by Espressor · · Score: 1

    Thanks Tim. It seems to me though this is tied to the bank, isn't it? Several people here have mentioned Citi in the US, but I don't think many other banks offer this. A few years ago PayPal had an attempt at such a service but for some reason they scraped it away.

  74. DHS exempting more travel records form Privacy Act by ehasbrouck · · Score: 1

    If you want to request your own records, do so ASAP: Even while stalling on responses to pending requests and appeals -- some unanswered after almost 2 years -- the DHS has recently moved to exempt more of this data from disclosure or requirements for accuracy, relevance, etc. Even more Privacy Act exemptions for PNR's and other "Automated Targeting System" data are pending, and could be finalized at any time. BTW, if you travelled to, from, or via the EU, or on an EU-based airline, or made reservations or bought tickets in the EU or through an EU-based company, or if your reservations were stored in the EU-based CRS Amadeus, you also have the right to request your travel records from these travel companies.