Slashdot Mirror


After 35 Years, Another Message Sent From Arecibo

0xdeadbeef writes "Two weeks ago, MIT artist-in-residence Joe Davis used the Arecibo radio telescope to send a message to three stars in honor of the 35th anniversary of the famous Drake-Sagan transmission to M13 in 1974. It was apparently allowed but not endorsed by the director of the facility, and used a jury-rigged signal source on what will now be known as the 'coolest iPhone in the world.' The message encoded a DNA sequence, but no word yet on whether it disabled any alien shields. You can get the low-down on Centauri Dreams: Part 1, Part 2."

249 comments

  1. And it was by 2.7182 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Send More Funding

    1. Re:And it was by Cryacin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Send More Funding

      I'm sure they won't be waiting any longer than usual for a response.

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    2. Re:And it was by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Who's this Drake Sagan guy? He sounds important.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:And it was by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... The weather is here, wish you were beautiful.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    4. Re:And it was by johnw · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it was - "Kids and grown ups love it so, the happy world of Arecibo"

    5. Re:And it was by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      ...No, really. We're still waiting for your reply. Seriously. So hurry up. Like, people are starting to think we're crazy, or on the fringe or something. Or just wrongmaybe. But we know you're real, right? So please, just say something. Ooh, wait! Id you're real and intelligent, don't say anything, then we'll know. OMG, LOL, thanx. Are you on Twitter?

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    6. Re:And it was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Interstellar communication? There's an app for that!"

    7. Re:And it was by thoughtspace · · Score: 1

      Alien wrote TLDR

    8. Re:And it was by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Lower Life Forms, Comfy Planet, Free Food!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    9. Re:And it was by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Please stop with the anal probes. Trailer parks angry.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:And it was by fataugie · · Score: 1

      Exactly, by sending the DNA sequence...they might as well have advertised the Blue Plate Special to our hungry, soon to be Overlords.

      --

      WTF? Over?

    11. Re:And it was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a waste of money. If they wanted to spend money on a message that no one would read or listen to, they ought to have just spent a stamp or a few cellphone minutes contacting their local senator. They'd get just as large of an audience either way. ;)

    12. Re:And it was by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      So you are offering the aliens to come take our comfy planet from us lower life forms and eat us for food?

    13. Re:And it was by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Free Food!

      Indeed. Like this, maybe...

    14. Re:And it was by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Jokes like that always got me slapped and/or dumped (for the times when being a nerd itself wasn't sufficient).

    15. Re:And it was by virtualnz · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't aliens already have contacted us if they're interested? Clearly we're not as interesting as other life forms.

      --
      Look Forge | Free Classifieds Buy and Sell http://www.lookforge.com/
  2. Wishful thinking by BetterSense · · Score: 0, Troll

    The idea that we can send radio signals to alien civilizations, or receive them, is unfortunately wishful thinking. "Contact" notwithstanding, it's not possible. We could never pick up a radio signal from an alien civilization because the power of a signal from a point source drops off exponentially. And it's not a matter of having a better amplifier either, because radio waves are actually quantized....eventually your signal has degraded to individual photons, and it doesn't take very long. My friend and I calculated that even with a MW-level transmitter, an alien civilazation on Alpha Centauri would need an impractically large dish to intercept even a trickle of photons.

    1. Re:Wishful thinking by PopeOptimusPrime · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If this transmission stimulates even one young person to do that calculation for themselves, or to otherwise conclude that it's a foolish waste of money, it will have been money well spent.

    2. Re:Wishful thinking by jcrb · · Score: 4, Informative

      We could never pick up a radio signal from an alien civilization because the power of a signal from a point source drops off exponentially..

      Umm..... its not a "point source" its a spherical reflector..... the whole point of the construction of big antennas is to allow you to do precisely what it is you friend appears to believe is impossible.

      We now return you to your usual /. chaos

      --
      -jon
    3. Re:Wishful thinking by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually I believe calculations have been done which show that two Arecibo type telescopes could communicate across the galaxy.

    4. Re:Wishful thinking by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      Except that Alpha Centauri's staggeringly advanced "alien" technology has solved this problem long, long ago.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    5. Re:Wishful thinking by AlexBirch · · Score: 1

      Do you have a blog where you publish these calculations, etc?
      This would be a great article for popular science, etc.

    6. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Pretty sure the power drops off with an inverse square law.

      Exponential != really fast. It's really really really really fast, eventually.

    7. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Oddly, we just solved this problem in E&M class. If you had antennas with 80 dBi gain at both ends and a megawatt of power, that would be sufficient to transmit 10^5 bits per second over a lightyear gap with a received power level above the thermal noise floor (e.g. the antenna does enough work on the receiver to flip a bit). Raise the distance to 100 lightyears and reduce the gain to 73 dBi (e.g. Arecibo) and you lose 5.5 orders of magnitude in bit rate. Up the power to three megawatts (not hard to imagine) and you get back half an order of magnitude. So the achievable rate over 100ly using only current Earth technology at both ends is about a bit per second. Useless, perhaps, but not technically impossible.

    8. Re:Wishful thinking by khayman80 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Not to mention the fact that even point source radiation falls off as the inverse square of the distance, which isn't at all the same thing as falling off exponentially.

    9. Re:Wishful thinking by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      Not really. College professors force young people to do similar calculations already.

    10. Re:Wishful thinking by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One bit per second is good enough for the Navy...

    11. Re:Wishful thinking by andy666 · · Score: 5, Funny

      This just in - they got a response:

      Dear Earthling,

      Hello! I am a creature from a galaxy far away, visiting your planet.
      I have transformed myself into this text file. As you are reading it, I
      am having sex with your eyeballs. I know you like it because you are
      smiling. Please pass me on to someone else because I'm really horny.

    12. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You have no idea about what you are talking about. It is true that omni directional radio sources are subject to inverse square law, but directional signals degrade less slowly. Scientists have calculated that using the Arecibo dish at one megawatt the signal could be received by a similarly sized dish 10000 lightyears away. I think I trust calculations done by people with PhDs in astronomy more than calculations done by you and your friend

    13. Re:Wishful thinking by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Useless, perhaps, but not technically impossible.

      The entire Wikipedia section on the production of titanium is a little under 4 kilobytes, which would take a bit over an hour to transmit at those rates. Imagine an alien species has a new ultra-efficient titanium refining process - would you wait a day to get the summary of it downloaded for your scientists? I sure as hell would.

      The two-hundred-year transmission lag to go a hundred lightyears is a far bigger issue than the bandwidth.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    14. Re:Wishful thinking by sahonen · · Score: 1

      Considering that your transmission is going to take a hundred years to get there in the first place, 1 bit per second wouldn't be all that bad.

      --
      Make me a friend and I'll mod you up
    15. Re:Wishful thinking by turtleAJ · · Score: 0

      Here is a picture of the dish,
      http://www.wikipuertorico.com/index.php?title=Arecibo_Observatory

      Pretty cool thing to go and visit!

    16. Re:Wishful thinking by speed+of+lightx2 · · Score: 1

      sorry, no. It drops potentially.

    17. Re:Wishful thinking by Nested · · Score: 4, Funny

      My Dear Friend and Earthling, My name is Mr. Zebel Braumat, I am a senior priest in the highest order of our race. We are conducting a standard process investigation/Recommendation on behalf of all Advanced Common Civilization (ACC). This investigation involves an ancient race who shares similar DNA as with yours from which we have previously received messages from. The circumstances which surrounding investments made by this race at ADB Gold Account, the Private Banking arm of ACC. The ACC Private Banking client died intestate and nominated no successor in title over the investments made with the bank amounting to over galactic 9.5 Gazillion dollars. The essence of this communication with you is to request that you provide us information/comments on any or all of the four issues as regards nominating your race to inherit the fund left behind by this previous race. You are therefore being contacted to be legally nominated as next of kin(inheritor) to this race after all enquiries and investigation has yielded results showing that there is no known successors. You are required therefore to answer this questions to enable us make our recommendation. 1-Are you aware of any relative/relation born on the 2nd of February 1951, who shares your same name whose last known contact address was West Africa? 2-Are you aware of any investment of considerable value made by such a person at the Private Banking Division of ADB Bank PLC? 3-Can you confirm your willingness to accept this inheritance if you are legally and legitimately nominated and approved to stand as inheritor to this huge investment in regards to the bank account with ADB? 4-Would you agree to donate part of this inheritance to charity if you are officially approved to stand as the inheritor? It is pertinent that you inform us ASAP whether or not you are familiar with this personality or and your interest towards the issues mentioned. You must appreciate that we are constrained from providing you with more detailed information at this point. Please respond to this mail as soon as possible to afford us the opportunity to provide you with more information on this investigation and recommendation. Thank you for accommodating our enquiry. Mr. Zebel Braumat For: Advanced Common Civilization Kappa Ceti (G5B)

    18. Re:Wishful thinking by Vectronic · · Score: 1

      Or, you could watch GoldenEye.

      Also, for those that are not visually impaired, a Satellite View (2.6MB) and an Airplane View (3.5 MB)

    19. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no idea about what you are talking about. It is true that omni directional radio sources are subject to inverse square law, but directional signals degrade less slowly.

      NO, they don't.

      Still inverse square. (once you're out of the near field)

    20. Re:Wishful thinking by voss · · Score: 1

      So the reason why noone has heard us, is not because noone is out there, but is because our technology for interstellar communication still sucks.
      Oddly enough that makes me feel much better about the chances of finding someone out there....eventually.

    21. Re:Wishful thinking by HaeMaker · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not in my lifetime.

    22. Re:Wishful thinking by Loomismeister · · Score: 2, Funny

      Radio waves aren't made out of photons?

    23. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well who'd want to talk to an ephemeral anyway?

    24. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I know the paernt is a FAKE because it's not all in caps.

    25. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      +3 Interesting, huh?

      This (and some previous, as well as some following) comments, have absolutely no clue whatsoever about E&M radiation. If you don't know, don't post.

      The strength of electromagnetic radiation drops off as the square of distance. (As long as you're far enough away to ignore "near-field effects", which for the astronomical distances we are talking about, they can very well be ignored.)

      It is always the square of the distance no matter what antenna geometry, gain, feed, or other technological measure is employed. It is not exponential (as stated by a previous post). They do not degrade "less slowly" as stated in the parent post. (And - "less slowly" - does that mean they degrade more faster?)

      I swear, I hardly ever post here, but I'm going to have to create an account just so I can reply to all the erroneous understandings of E&M that get modded up. I expected this readership to be better than that.

    26. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "stimulates even one young person to do that calculation for themselves" != "force young people to do similar calculations"

      Being interested in science and doing things because you want to is very different from just doing it because you have to to pass the class you're taking because you have to.

    27. Re:Wishful thinking by nanospook · · Score: 1

      Have you been blinded by your cell phone lately?

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    28. Re:Wishful thinking by AnotherUsername · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not in my lifetime.

      But maybe mine. I plan on living to be at least 500, hopefully more. So far, so good.

      --
      I don't like Linux. This doesn't make me a troll.
    29. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Squared is to the exponent of 2 isn't it? Thus exponentially.

    30. Re:Wishful thinking by danlip · · Score: 2, Informative

      No. The signal strength is 1/(r^2). Exponentially would be 1/(c^r), where c is some constant and r is the radius. Exponentially means r is in the exponent, not the base.

    31. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just further proof that the message is from a highly advanced civilization...

    32. Re:Wishful thinking by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Not in my lifetime.

      But maybe mine. I plan on living to be at least 500, hopefully more. So far, so good.

      How long have you lived so far?

    33. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Dear Earthling,

        I have been requested by the Inter Planetary Resource Foundation to contact you for assistance in resolving a matter. The Inter Planetary Resource Foundation has recently concluded a large number of contracts for resource exploration in the Alpha Centauri region. The contracts have immediately produced moneys equalling $40,000,000 in your currency. The Inter Planetary Resource Foundation is desirous of resource exploration in other parts of the galaxy, however, because of certain regulations of the Galactic council, it is unable to move these funds to another region.

      Your assistance is requested to assist the Inter Planetary Resource Foundation in moving these funds out of the region. If the funds can be transferred to your name, in your Earthling bank account, then you can forward the funds as directed by the Inter Planetary Resource Foundation . In exchange for your accomodating services, the Inter Planetary Resource Foundation would agree to allow you to retain 10%, or US$4 million of this amount.

      However, to be a legitimate transferee of these moneys according to Nigerian law, you must presently be a depositor of at least US$100,000 in a bank which is regulated by the Inter Planetary Resource Foundation.

      If it will be possible for you to assist us, we would be most grateful. Please reply to this message at your earliest convenience.

    34. Re:Wishful thinking by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Arguing over inverse square law aside, is the 10,000 figure generally correct?

    35. Re:Wishful thinking by pelrun · · Score: 1

      But *why* is it still the square of the distance when I always thought that was just a natural consequence of the increase in volume of a sphere as it's radius increases? If antenna gain makes no difference, then why bother with it at all?

    36. Re:Wishful thinking by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is true that omni directional radio sources are subject to inverse square law, but directional signals degrade less slowly.

      As it is a linear partial differential equation, all solutions to the wave equation and equations of its type are governed by what is known as the "fundamental solution" or "Green's function" of the equation. In the case of wave type equations(in 3 or more dimensions), this solution will be a delta function type solution which decreases inversely with distance from the source. Squaring its amplitude to obtain energy gives an inverse square energy decrease.

      It must be stressed that all solutions of the wave equation, no matter what the sources, or boundary or initial conditions, must all be functions derived, more or less, from convolutions of the fundamental solution with the source terms. You cannot escape the inverse square behaviour of wave propagation over long distances with finite wave sources. The fundamental solution characterises all waves because of the linearity of the wave equation.

      Now, there is a second fundamental solution for the wave equation; the so called "acausal" Green's function, which represents an inwardly collapsing wave, or by some conventions, a wave travelling backwards through time. Naturally, these waves are not considered in the context of the transmission of signals. Even if they were, these waves also display and inverse square relation for signal strength( going backwards in time of course).

      This has been your daily mathematical public service announcement. Complaints to be directed to the Dean.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    37. Re:Wishful thinking by Plunky · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The entire Wikipedia section on the production of titanium is a little under 4 kilobytes, which would take a bit over an hour to transmit at those rates. Imagine an alien species has a new ultra-efficient titanium refining process - would you wait a day to get the summary of it downloaded for your scientists? I sure as hell would.

      In the science fiction story "Dragons Egg" by Robert L Forward (who was incidentally a physics professor and described the book as "a textbook on neutron star physics disguised as a novel"), a spaceship beams the entire contents of their encyclopedia to creatures living on the surface of a neutron star at high speed. By the time they are halfway through, several hundred generations have passed and the creatures have solved all the problems that remain to be sent, have built spaceships of their own and are knocking on the hull. One of my favourite books ever, describing the postive viewpoint of giving knowledge away for free.

      There are negative viewpoints though, such as presented by Gregory Benford (also a physics prof, and another of my favourite authors) where broadcasting anything attracts the attention of machines whose only purpose is to destroy organic life.

      I'm not sure which theory is more likely to be proved. I would prefer the first (and I release my own code under the BSD licence) but I'm afraid that it only takes one civilisation to construct self-replicating terminators that could take over the galaxy at a significant fraction of the speed of light. Furthermore, since we only have one civilisation to study and our usual response seems to have been "We come in peace, shoot to kill" I'm not desperately confident for the long term future of the human race. After all, it doesn't seem likely that we are the first..

    38. Re:Wishful thinking by drerwk · · Score: 1

      Not volume. Surface area. What is the amount of energy passing through some unit area in a unit of time. Google flux. For a sphere, the area increase as r^2. Double the distance and you have 1/4 the flux. The point of a big dish is to intercept more of the flux, and to get better angular resolution.

    39. Re:Wishful thinking by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure that giving knowledge away for free was really promoted there. The humans did give away knowledge, and in the end it worked out but for a time it started a lot of shit.

      And then at the end of Dragon's Egg, the now-vastly-more-advanced aliens don't actually return the favour to the humans. Not directly, anyway: they leave the secrets in places that can only be accessed once the secret has already been discovered, basically so humans can check their work when they catch up.

    40. Re:Wishful thinking by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, it also only takes one civilization to construct self-replicating peacekeepers that could defend the galaxy at a significant fraction of the speed of light. And if those self-replicating terminators already exist, well, we're fucked as it is, so we may as well get it over with quickly.

      I actually wouldn't be surprised if we are the first, or at least, the first with a good shot at reaching an interstellar society within our galaxy, simply based on the fact that any species that goes interstellar will probably expand at nearly the speed of light after doing so. The mere fact that our earth hasn't been colonized yet indicates that there may not be any interstellar species within our light cone.

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    41. Re:Wishful thinking by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But *why* is it still the square of the distance when I always thought that was just a natural consequence of the increase in volume of a sphere as it's radius increases? If antenna gain makes no difference, then why bother with it at all?

      Because although the covered area is much smaller, it still grows quadratically with distance (there simply is no such thing as an exactly parallel beam). The antenna makes a difference in that you get a higher signal in the desired direction to begin with. If your signal is e.g. 25 times as strong in a certain direction, it will remain 25 times as strong even after millions of lightyears. So at a distance where the weak signal would be barely detectable, you still have 25 times the threshold, which should be clearly detectable. Indeed, 25 times the strength means 5 times the reach, due to the inverse scale law.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    42. Re:Wishful thinking by CptPicard · · Score: 1

      No, it does not drop off "exponentially". That would be a much more extreme dropoff than inverse-square.

      --
      I want to play Free Market with a drowning Libertarian.
    43. Re:Wishful thinking by VShael · · Score: 1

      I think you'd find that the translation of 4kb of info from a page in an alien encyclopaedia, would be a far bigger issue than either the bandwidth or the 200 year lag.

    44. Re:Wishful thinking by srussia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Except that Alpha Centauri's staggeringly advanced "alien" technology has solved this problem long, long ago.

      Unfortunately, they have also developed staggeringly advanced spam filters that will dump our message in the "junk" folder.

      --
      Set your phasers on "funky"!
    45. Re:Wishful thinking by ZorbaTHut · · Score: 1

      Depends. I'm imagining just sending the chemical formulas across. It wouldn't be all that hard to come up with a lingua franca for chemistry - it's not like hydrogen behaves differently on Alpha Centauri or anything.

      Pin down the chemistry basics, get the essential formulas, then send "oh yeah and also titanium plus these chemicals equals this other set of chemicals, add electricity and you get this, then separate and you get this". At that point it's just down to an engineering challenge to figure out that "separate" means "in a centrifuge at 2000 degrees", and in the meantime we'll be trying to pin down more words just in case our scientists can't get it across.

      The goal isn't to transmit the exact right words, it's to transmit enough of the core breakthroughs that the science teams on either side can reconstruct whatever's left.

      Of course we'll probably burn a few weeks trying to figure out why it isn't working before they think to mention that oh yeah their atmosphere is 22% sulfur, that might be important now that you mention it

      --
      Breaking Into the Industry - A development log about starting a game studio.
    46. Re:Wishful thinking by vlm · · Score: 1

      Considering that your transmission is going to take a hundred years to get there in the first place, 1 bit per second wouldn't be all that bad.

      1 * 60 * 60 * 24 * 365 * 100 / 8 = a bit less than 400 megs enroute at any given time. So you could send them about half a cdrom before they even got the first bit, or about a wikipedia per decade. Of course if the deletionists get their way, we could probably send the wikipedia in about a month.

      The Entire wikipedia is only about 5 gigs.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_database

      Note that the bit rate is proportional to the transmit power and antenna size. I suspect if there were actually something out there, we'd have multiple GW class power plants feeding an orbital antenna the size of a small asteroid.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    47. Re:Wishful thinking by juhaz · · Score: 1

      But maybe mine. I plan on living to be at least 500, hopefully more. So far, so good.

      Across the galaxy takes 200000 years round-trip so you better hope for quite a few more.

    48. Re:Wishful thinking by pbrooks100 · · Score: 1

      Slow data is better than no data...

    49. Re:Wishful thinking by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Falling off geometrically doesn't sound anything like as exciting though.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    50. Re:Wishful thinking by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Our star is in the second generation, so anyone around a first generation star had a head start of a few billion years. They'd have much more difficulty reaching space because they'd have a shortage of heavier elements (most of the ones we have access to come from the collapse of first-generation stars). With self-replicating colonies and a decent ion drive (i.e. stuff we could build with known science and just a bit of engineering effort if we had the political will), it would take around a million years to colonise the entire galaxy. Between the formation of the first planets in this galaxy and the formation of life on Earth there was enough time for a few thousand species to be born, create galaxy-spanning empires, and die out (or become non-corporeal, or go to a different universe, or whatever species do once they've conquered the entire galaxy).

      It's also worth noting that the majority of stars in this galaxy are binaries. Life around single stars might be more rare. The tidal forces from the two stars on the crust of a planet in a binary system are likely to increase surface radioactivity and mutation rate, and intelligence would be much more of an advantage in the rapidly changing environment of a planet in an eccentric orbit. It's entirely possible that there are interstellar civilisations around most of the binary stars in the galaxy, completely ignoring us because life around single stars is so unlikely it's not worth investing effort searching for.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    51. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But *why* is the apostrophe the single hardest symbol for people to use when I always thought that people who routinely discuss the workings of the universe and the intricacies of programming languages are smart? IT'S MEANS *IT IS*.

    52. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inverse square law applies whatever kind of antenna is used.

      It is just that a directional antenna concentrates the power in the appropriate direction, rather than spreading it out in an omni fashion. This means you have more *effective* power in one direction (or maybe multiple directions depending on the antenna type)to start off with. A dish is extremley directional, thus has far more gain (and you get far more ERP [*EFFECTIVE* Radiated Power] than a dipole, or beam type antenna.

      Typically the bigger the dish, the bigger the gain at a certain frequency. Typically the higher the frequency, the bigger the gain as well. Aricebo is jolly large.

    53. Re:Wishful thinking by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      So how, in unambiguous binary, would you represent hydrogen? Pictorially it's easy. Well, kind of; you'll find that all of the visual models that we use, like a dot with a single circle around it, are actually tied very closely to human cognitive models. Unfortunately, you can't describe a picture encoding scheme until you've got basic communication. And even then you'd be assuming that they thought in terms of space in the same way that we do. If their primary sense is echolocation, for example, then they wouldn't think of distance and speed as separate quantities as we do and so a picture would be difficult for them to understand.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    54. Re:Wishful thinking by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      You didn't include the 3000 years it would take to figure out the alien language over such a slow connection.

    55. Re:Wishful thinking by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      It's to do with the spread. Take a flashlight and shine it on a piece of paper 1m away. Measure the radius of the circle. Now move the paper 2m away and measure the circle again. The light is spreading out at a fixed angle from the front of the flashlight, so the radius of the second circle will be twice as big as the first one. Because the radius is twice as big, the area will be four times as big. Now try it with a laser. You'll see the same thing[1]. The radius at 2m will be twice the radius at 1m and the area will be four times the area at 1m. The spread in absolute terms, however, will be much smaller. If you look from one side of the beam, and put some smoke into its path so you can see it, you will see a triangle. You can make the angle at the top of the triangle (the signal source) very small. With a laser, the angle is theoretically zero, and practically very close to zero. The signal spread is always (distance * some constant)^2, but the constant can be very small.

      [1] Well, not quite, you also need to subtract the radius at the source of the beam.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    56. Re:Wishful thinking by julesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      One bit per second is good enough for the Navy...

      Yes, but only because they have prearranged short codes for orders that are likely to be given. A message only a handful of characters long can be useful under those circumstances.

    57. Re:Wishful thinking by BetterSense · · Score: 1

      A broadcasting alien civilization would only use a reflector if it knew where you were. I was speaking to the situation where said civilization is blindly broadcasting in all directions in the hope of the signal reaching someone else.

      Ok, geometrically.

    58. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that's what you expect, you may as well give up. This is Slashdot; trying to educate the users here is like trying to stop a hurricane by pissing into the wind.

    59. Re:Wishful thinking by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      I'm not planning to die at all. Considering that there are more people living than have ever died, the odds aren't looking too bad ^.^

      --
      It is what it is.
    60. Re:Wishful thinking by Snaller · · Score: 1

      Spoil sport!

      --
      If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    61. Re:Wishful thinking by Strilanc · · Score: 1

      It's really just a matter of trying to make things obvious. You send simple messages at first, allowing the receiver to guess at your format and confirm it with later messages. Then you start sending more complicated messages in the same format.

      For example, use a character set of {00,01,10,11}, which I'm going to simplify as {0, 1, space, next} for display purposes. You receive:

      0 0 0 0
      0 1 0 1
      0 0 1 1
      0 1 1 10
      0 10 1 11
      0 10 110 1000 ...

      1 0 0 0
      1 1 1 1
      1 1 0 0
      1 0 1 0
      1 10 10 100
      1 11 11 1001 ...

      Get it? Atoms would be done the same way. They even have an implicit order for sending!

    62. Re:Wishful thinking by drerwk · · Score: 1

      It is a point source at any reasonable (astronomical) distance, that is to say it produces a spherical wave front not plane waves. It does fall off as 1/r^2. There are at least a couple of reasons to build big antennae, 1) to increase the area of the collection, and hence the energy collected, 2) to increase the aperture to minimize diffraction - of course the VLA has a much larger effective aperture.
      See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diffraction#Diffraction_by_a_circular_aperture
      Though the approximation I like is lamba/Lens ~ distance/final area.

    63. Re:Wishful thinking by Leynos · · Score: 1

      Me, I would take a consistent way of representing a hydrogen atom, helium atom, etc. Then describe some fundamental chemical reactions to illustrate what I'm getting at. Take that a step further, add additional vocabulary for describing electron shells, then describe some ionization reactions. Likewise for isotopes and radioactive decay.

      Sooner or later, you have a language.

      The way the structure of DNA is described in the original arecibo message is a great example IMO.

      Of course, to describe any complex process you first you have to define a language for maths and logic.

      And then you have mass, time, distance etc, which can all be described in terms of various atomic properties.

      Of course, all this has been discussed at length a million times already.

      --
      "Did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage?"
    64. Re:Wishful thinking by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Considering that there are more people living than have ever died

      That just seems a bit unlikely to me. Link please?

    65. Re:Wishful thinking by jhol13 · · Score: 1

      OTOH the entire section on Britney Spears ...

      I can imagine more people interested about alien B.P. than titita.. titani... whatever.

    66. Re:Wishful thinking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~> ping GJ 83.1
      PING GJ 83.1 (REALLYREALLYFARAWAY) 56(84) bytes of data.
      64 bytes from GJ 83.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=GJ 14.51 yrs
      64 bytes from GJ 83.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=GJ 14.51 yrs
      64 bytes from GJ 83.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=GJ 14.51 yrs
      --- GJ 83.1 ping statistics ---
      3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss
      rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 83.11/83.1/83.1 yrs
      ~>

      Well! I guess that's the problem with warcraft!

    67. Re:Wishful thinking by numbski · · Score: 1

      *Looks around*

      Yup. We're geeks alright.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    68. Re:Wishful thinking by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      So the achievable rate over 100ly using only current Earth technology at both ends is about a bit per second.

      Just like my first discounted TRS-80 modem! Ah, the memories.
         

    69. Re:Wishful thinking by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      an alien civilazation on Alpha Centauri would need an impractically large dish to intercept even a trickle of photons.

      How did you calculate what is practical or impractical for an alien civilisation to build?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    70. Re:Wishful thinking by Shadowmist · · Score: 1

      This particular item was more of an homage to Sagan and co. than an actual scientific experiment. That said, I do remember reading about Areceibo in a National Geographic article, which stated that Arecibo could pick up a message from a duplicate of itself transmitting anywhere in the Milky Way Galaxy, barring unfavorable local conditions within line of sight.

    71. Re:Wishful thinking by ImYourVirus · · Score: 1

      Man someone needs to power-wash that thing. I'm sure you get a better signal if it's clean.

      --
      Why is common sense called that if it's not common?
    72. Re:Wishful thinking by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Considering that there are more people living than have ever died

      That just seems a bit unlikely to me. Link please?

      I don't think there is a credible source for this, as the ratio is probably about 1/20 - 1/10 (or less?)... I do wonder at which point of the history the ratio was greatest?

      (Discounting the arbitrary beginning where humanoids could for the first time be defined as humans)

      --
      It is what it is.
    73. Re:Wishful thinking by Keebler71 · · Score: 1

      Our star is in the second generation, so anyone around a first generation star had a head start of a few billion years.

      But you're forgetting that those first generation stars would not have abundant "interesting" elements form which to both form life and conduct interesting experiments with. These elements are birthed during the late cycles of a star's life and hence would not have been available to a first gen star system.

      --
      "It takes considerable knowledge just to realize the extent of your own ignorance." - Thomas Sowell
    74. Re:Wishful thinking by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      One bit per second is good enough for the Navy...

      Yes, but only because they have prearranged short codes for orders that are likely to be given. A message only a handful of characters long can be useful under those circumstances.

      We're talking about 200 years of latency here... I think we can tolerate the message taking a few weeks to transmit...

      Just to add to the geek levels in this thread, 1 bit/s = 86.4kb/day, which means we would transmit the 3,153,600,000th bit as the first bit reached its destination, or 394 MB. That's about one well-compressed episode of your favorite science fiction show... Should we start with SG-1 or BSG?

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    75. Re:Wishful thinking by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

      "...but directional signals degrade less slowly"

      [pedant] Hang on, doesn't less slowly = faster? [/pedant}

      --
      It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  3. We are here! Come and get us! by orkysoft · · Score: 5, Funny

    We are very tasty snacks! Here, have our DNA, and grow some appetizers for the long journey!

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    1. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Since ET already gets all our TV transmissions, plus cell phones and wifi, I don't think this one will make much difference.

    2. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by vlm · · Score: 1

      Since ET already gets all our TV transmissions, plus cell phones and wifi, I don't think this one will make much difference.

      Check out Radio Astronomy by Kraus. The end of one of the chapters discusses the relative signal strength of various earth transmissions. From memory, planetary radar was by far the strongest, the AM modulated video carrier of old fashioned analog UHF TV transmitters came in second (of course they're shut down now, and the "peak" from ATSC is not nearly as impressive).

      Cell towers are actually pretty low power, your typical EMS land mobile is much more impressive (think of what you hear on a police scanner), and aimed down, think about it, you need a two way path, so a MW level cell tower could easily be built, but it could never hear your little mW level phone, so there is no point. A gross generalization is that receive technology/ability is pretty constant in the radio world, the only thing big money buys is transmit power.

      http://www.cqbooks.com/radastro.htm

      To grotesquely butcher and summarize Professor Kraus's calculations, if you're close enough to visit the earth (couple centuries near light speed flight time), you're probably close enough to notice very odd radio emissions from the earth in general, not just special planetary radar stunts.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Power isn't the only thing that's important though. The termination shock, as I recall, has a similar effect to the ionosphere with respect to signals under a certain wavelength and bounces them back. Things like submarine radio might get through, but they'd be too low power to be received. Things like television will just be bounced around until they are too attenuated to be distinguished from background noise. That's why experiments like this one use very low frequency signals.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      What wifi router do you own and how much was it?

    5. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by redhat_redneck · · Score: 1

      it's a cookbook!!!!!!

    6. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Since ET already gets all our TV transmissions, plus cell phones and wifi, I don't think this one will make much difference.

      But now they have the recipe.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    7. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Reply: "Nah, all you chordates taste like chicken. You can have all your stinken bases back."

    8. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by Stupid+McStupidson · · Score: 0

      They won't care too much about our DNA. We won't care much either, since the near-luminal velocity missiles will hit before they are spotted. On the off chance you survive the cataclysm, I'd start trying to figure out how to survive without electricity. Fucking Sagan.

    9. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The Arecibo radar seems to transmit at 430 MHz which is not exactly low frequency. Submarine radio (at 100Hz) is highly unlikely to make it out of the ionosphere, let alone getting mast the termination shock. Anything which can get in, can by definition get out. So our radio telescopes tell us what frequencies make it into the solar system and the atmosphere.

    10. Re:We are here! Come and get us! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah but power from multiple sources can be summed, though the information it carries would be largely lost in the process. Individual radars may emit the most power but I suspect the collective output from different transmitters would add up to a lot of power. A distant receiver would be able to extract information from the Doppler shifts at the very least.

  4. Practical joke by dachshund · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Without any context --- e.g., our biochemistry, amino acid structure, nature of DNA --- this message amounts to about the worst practical joke in the history of interstellar communication. It has a relatively non-random structure, so clearly must mean something, and yet they'll never figure it out.

    1. Re:Practical joke by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Without any context --- e.g., our biochemistry, amino acid structure, nature of DNA --- this message amounts to about the worst practical joke in the history of interstellar communication. It has a relatively non-random structure, so clearly must mean something, and yet they'll never figure it out.

      But if they do figure it out, we'll get a message a century from now: "Delicious! Do you have any other recipes?"

    2. Re:Practical joke by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      Then we send them a decoded copy of "To Serve Man."

    3. Re:Practical joke by ShakaUVM · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >>But if they do figure it out, we'll get a message a century from now: "Delicious! Do you have any other recipes?"

      Sadly, people rarely stop to wonder if the messages we're sending into outer space are a good idea. Aliens with a good grasp of game theory might just very well decide to drop a meteor onto any planet they find broadcasting into outer space. You know... just to be sure.

      I actually find it sort of thoughtless that people like this are taking the entire fate of the world into their hands. Dramatic? Not so much, if you really stop to think about it.

    4. Re:Practical joke by jipn4 · · Score: 1

      There's a good chance that this kind of biochemistry is universal; the universe is full of the kind of stuff that our DNA and proteins are made from, but we haven't observed a lot of other complex chemicals elsewhere.

    5. Re:Practical joke by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      My favorite Twilight Zone episode. :)

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    6. Re:Practical joke by jdigriz · · Score: 1

      It's a little late now. All transmissions of significant power that are not reflected by the ionosphere have been going into space for over a century. The only difference with Arecibo is that it's directional and concentrated.

    7. Re:Practical joke by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      wonder if the messages we're sending into outer space are a good idea. Aliens with a good grasp of game theory might just very well decide to drop a meteor onto any planet they find broadcasting into outer space...

      Maybe the dinosaurs broadcasted also, winning Earth's first, but not last Galactic Darwin Award.
         

    8. Re:Practical joke by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Without any context --- e.g., our biochemistry, amino acid structure, nature of DNA --- this message amounts to about the worst practical joke in the history of interstellar communication.

      But it is probably also the -best- practical joke in -our-history of interstellar communication. How many other interstellar practical jokes have we played?

      It has a relatively non-random structure, so clearly must mean something, and yet they'll never figure it out.

      It might just be a lack of imagination on my part, but I can't picture an organism evolving without some type of intrinsic code. If we got such a code, we'd probably realize that it was something similar to nucleotide sequences and that we didn't have all the tools to do anything with it.

    9. Re:Practical joke by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Right, meaning that aliens that might lack the ability to detect the omnidirectional signal might be able to receive this.

    10. Re:Practical joke by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      The message is irrelevant, there's only so much they can learn from us even if they understand the message. What really matters is that they know we're there somewhere up in the sky.

      What puzzles me is that we do it once every 35 years for a few minutes, yet the rest of the time we spend it carefully listening, as if aliens would do what we do not do, which is actively trying to communicate with them. They won't pick up a damn thing unless we beam it to them specifically, so if they're as dumb as us and only listen and don't try to send then not much is every going to happen.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    11. Re:Practical joke by couchslug · · Score: 1

      (Earnest frothing ensues.)

      "But, but, we are naive and idealistic! Any other life forms with advanced technology MUST agree with our moral constructs because morality must be universal."

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    12. Re:Practical joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A good grasp of game theory" motivates genocide?

      Well, keep up your high morals... I'm sure you've got a very good grasp of game theory.

    13. Re:Practical joke by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      There's this one guy who recommends some fava beans, and a nice Chianti.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    14. Re:Practical joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that the message almost certainly contains enough information to score an unambiguous hit in a decent database of chemical compounds.

      They would have to search in all possible databases, since they don't know that it is chemistry, which means it might score all sorts of unrelated hits. That's where the assumption comes in that the receiver is intelligent in the same way that we are.

      The point of this experiment, or piece of art, was to learn more about ourselves by finding out what we would send to another civilization if we could.

    15. Re:Practical joke by khallow · · Score: 1

      I actually find it sort of thoughtless that people like this are taking the entire fate of the world into their hands. Dramatic? Not so much, if you really stop to think about it.

      I think it's pretty sweet that an artist can with a simple radio transmitter damn all life on Earth. Now that is power. Maybe if you send all your money, he'll let Earth live?

      A simpler solution to the problem is to develop a human civilization that can weather an interstellar attack. We'll want it anyway.

    16. Re:Practical joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if we assume that the aliens can use a laser to zap meteors our way, it would still take a hundred years or so for the laser beam to travel from their solar system to our solar system and hit the meteor. During all that time, what are the odds that human civilization hasn't either:

      a) Blown itself up?
      b) Developed a similar laser that can zap the same meteor out of our way?

      The homicidal aliens would rather need a laser that can zap earth-sized planets from a distance of 100 ly...

    17. Re:Practical joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whatever. There is no hiding from a sufficiently advanced civilization.

      If they exist, they will have picked us up not from our radio signals, but rather by a routine spectroscopic analysis of our atmosphere, showing tell-tale signs of rampant industrialism (including, but not limited to, a sharp rise in CO2 levels since their last reading).

      I assume that they have something like 100 space-based telescopes each of which can scan and analyze one planet per second, which would amount to 3 billion planets per year. With about 4-6 billion planets in the solar system they could scan our atmosphere every 18 months.

      If they only dedicate 1% of telescope time to scanning Milky Way planets, that would mean that we get scanned once every 150 years. In either case, they will notice us before we have a chance to clean our atmosphere of all the tell-tale traces of us.

    18. Re:Practical joke by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      These stars are within 100 light-years. If they have the capacity to hit us with an asteroid, they've already got probes monitoring our development. It's highly unlikely that we could inform anyone of our existence who didn't know about us already unless they were at a similar level of technological advancement.

      Or if we have reached more or less the pinnacle of possible spaceflight.

    19. Re:Practical joke by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Sadly, people rarely stop to wonder if the messages we're sending into outer space are a good idea. Aliens with a good grasp of game theory might just very well decide to drop a meteor onto any planet they find broadcasting into outer space. You know... just to be sure.

      I actually find it sort of thoughtless that people like this are taking the entire fate of the world into their hands. Dramatic? Not so much, if you really stop to think about it.

      Oh, man. Are you one of Glenn Beck's writers?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    20. Re:Practical joke by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Aliens with a good grasp of game theory might just very well decide to drop a meteor onto any planet they find broadcasting into outer space

      If by 'good' you mean 'incredibly poor,' then yes. The response that game theory would dictate to that kind of attack would be a similar (or greater) response. The only way in which a near-C mass[1] attack would be a good plan would be if you could guarantee species annihilation in the first strike. Given that this signal is for starts 100ly away, you'd have to be able to guarantee that, within the next 100 years[2], we would not have any off-planet colonies that would be able to launch a counter attack.

      You'd also have to make sure that there was no evidence of it that was observable from other star systems. The collision would be detectable a long way away, and you'd have to hope that no one else saw it and decided that the galaxy would be better off without a belligerent species like yours in it.

      [2] It would have to be near-C or we'd see it coming and be able to intercept it, and also know who to shoot back at before it got here even if we couldn't destroy it in time.

      [1] Assuming a straight-line projectile. In practice, you'd want to slingshot it around a different star to make it less obvious that you were the originator.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Practical joke by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I guess more people need to watch Species.

    22. Re:Practical joke by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      There was much discussion of this in the 80s. The problem is the existence of relativistic bombs.

      The R-Bomb is basically some mass, say an asteroid or space ship, rammed into a planet at a significant fraction of the speed of light. To give you can idea, the Space Shuttle hitting the earth at 30% light speed would have more energy than all the nuclear weapons on earth 300 times over.

      Worse still, such weapons are almost impossible to detect or to defend against. Say you have a mass coming in at 90% the speed of light. By the time you see it (no mean feat in itself, the sky is big and the object small) it is already too late to move out of the way, not that you could move an entire planet. Throwing stuff in its way won't help, unless it can mass to absorb that much energy.

      Any advanced civilisation could create these weapons. You basically need a source of energy and a means of propulsion to get your mass up to speed. Because communication with distant civilisations takes many years (more likely hundreds of thousands) you can't be sure that the people receiving the message won't reply with an R-Bomb. Thus, the best thing to do is try and stay quiet and hide. If you do discover someone else, send them an R-Bomb just in case.

      Well, that's the theory anyway. I'm not convinced but then again there is no way to know what other civilisations will be like, so no way to even guess at the level of risk involved.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Practical joke by 0xdeadbeef · · Score: 1

      You're assuming an incredibly advanced technology for a naive young species shouting its presence to every predator in the cosmos.

    24. Re:Practical joke by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>If by 'good' you mean 'incredibly poor,' then yes. The response that game theory would dictate to that kind of attack would be a similar (or greater) response.

      Given that aliens might be friendly, or might be hostile, with some unknown percentage, and you have the option of destroying them before they discover the 15th ubnotz principle... then yeah.

      It might also explain why we've never found signals with SETI - anyone getting to the electronic age gets a relativistic chunk of rock dropped on their planet.

    25. Re:Practical joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you REALLY stop to THINK about it, then NO!

    26. Re:Practical joke by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      My favorite Simpsons episode :)

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  5. I have a message to the Earthlings! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  6. The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dear citizens of Centauri. I have a large sum of gold, 300 metric tons, I need to move off planet. If you'll deposit a small transfer fee, 3 metric tons of gold, in a local bank I will make arrangements to ship the gold to you. Signed crowned prince of Iowa.

    1. Re:The message by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If you'll deposit a small transfer fee, 3 metric tons of gold, in a local bank

      Okay here it is.

      CRASH...

    2. Re:The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, it was: "3nl4rg3 ur p3n1s now!!! No pumps, No exercises!"

    3. Re:The message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      James T Kirk? Is that you? Stop playing with the communicator and get your homework done!

    4. Re:The message by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      it was: "3nl4rg3 ur p3n1s now!!!

      Earth males will know they're doomed when the following response arrives: "All 12 of them? At the same time?"

    5. Re:The message by marqs · · Score: 0

      This is Emperor Ming from the planet Mongo. I have dropped of the 3 metric tons, now where is my 300?

  7. Re:Just don't take any calls by Cal27 · · Score: 5, Funny

    These guys must be loaded. Would you believe the rates they're charging for interstellar calls?

  8. If an alien intercepts, is this Space Travel? by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    By sending them our DNA sequence, they can then reconstruct a human at their location.

    1. Re:If an alien intercepts, is this Space Travel? by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      ...right somebody has been reading too much pop-science and not nearly enough of the real thing.
      You can't construct a species with *just* DNA, that idea was popular in the 60's real geneticists have long since learned better.
      For starters, there are prions - which have a significant impact on how DNA is actually USED to make proteins, (same DNA, different prions - very different [and probably dead] result).
      And that's not the half of it. Did you know that frog DNA is several orders of magnitude more complex than human DNA ?

      Well it needs to be - frog eggs hatch in an uncontrolled environment so it's filled with little sequences that say things like "if temperature is between 0 and 5 C produces enzyme A, between 6 and 10C produce enzyme B" etc. (this is vastly oversimplified but you get the idea).
      Human DNA is developed inside a perfectly controlled environment (known as the womb) so it doesn't bother with such code, all the code in there can assume that the development will be happening at around 37C.

      Or how about the fact that you have about five billion times as many connections between the neurons in your brain (the rest of us about 15 :p ) as there are genes in the human genome ? In short, humans are a lot more complex than our DNA is.

      Oh and how about this little gem. Inside the human genome is the complete DNA code for a very deadly virus. Split up into three disconnected sections (so it can't form the virus) - the virus itself is extinct but would have been quite the terrible plague in it's day - all mammals have it, we must have gotten it very shortly after we BECAME mammals, and it stuck because we stole a major trick from the virus. The virus knew how to hide itself from our immune systems - well, the DNA that encoded how it does that, is now used by fetuses to prevent the mother's immune system from killing them.

      So... inside human DNA is DNA that isn't human, you *could* make a human being without having any of it (probably we don't know for sure that the other parts aren't used somewhere, but it's very unlikely) provided you had an alternate way of preventing the mother's immune system from attacking the fetus (or perhaps an artificial uterus).

      In short, I'm with the GP: a DNA sequence, without any context will present (at best) a practical joke... come to think of it... if they managed to extract the virus bits and construct that (since, after all virusses are way simpler organisms and don't need all those prions and enzymes and mitochondria we do)... well, we may just end up unleashing a plague and wiping out the very aliens we were trying to contact (or at the very least, pissing them off and ensuring they arrange a visit from the galactic version of the CDC to come impose a permanent quarantine and pest-control)...

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    2. Re:If an alien intercepts, is this Space Travel? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      By sending them our DNA sequence, they can then reconstruct a human at their location.

      If it's like putting together Ikea furniture, I don't want to know where they mis-put the privates.
         

  9. Ok really? by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, I understand the "coolness" factor of radio transmissions to the stars, but in the end are they all wasted money? I mean, chances are another Hubble mixed with other probes can find where there is other life faster, quicker and easier than radio telescopes. We've been trying these for ages and they haven't picked up anything. So why not spend research money doing things that we know are going to work. Plus, its a whole lot more probable that we will find non-intelligent life throughout the universe than intelligent life. Even if we find life outside earth with the technology level of 1700s earth, they won't be picking up these signals and really for all but the last 100 years, humans wouldn't have been able to pick up this signal. So quit messing around with radio signals and find possible planets for life.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    1. Re:Ok really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, I understand the "coolness" factor of radio transmissions to the stars, but in the end are they all wasted money? I mean, chances are another Hubble mixed with other probes can find where there is other life faster, quicker and easier than radio telescopes.

      False dichotomy. And you can use radio-telescopes from Earth, unlike optical telescopes, which must be put into orbit to see long distances.

    2. Re:Ok really? by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

      Another big problem is that for radio astronomy to work in finding alien signals, we must count on stability of civilizations on both ends to make it work, which history shows to be wishful thinking. If aliens do pick up this message and response, who's to say that by the time the response gets here we will have any resources at all to pick it up due to some war or other nonsense or having merely forgot or lost interest about such things over time. The same would seem to apply to the other end(s). Also, many of the calculations about our signals being able to traverse great distances seem to assume that there is nothing but "free space" in the way, which is an unproven assumption to say the least. Even relatively small amounts of matter from dead stars and such could cause a gravitational scatter of the signal...

    3. Re:Ok really? by joe_frisch · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope its a waste of money, but there is a tiny chance it is a lot worse: something listening might actually be able to come here. Historically when the "guys on the ships" meet the "guys on the shore", the guys on the shore don't do very well. One could also make an argument that if you detect an alien culture, your best bet is to launch a relativistic bomb (or the information equivalent).

    4. Re:Ok really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, light travels from their star to us, light is somewhere in the EM spectrum, radio is somewhere in the EM spectrum, I'm going to assume it's likely the signal will make it there.

    5. Re:Ok really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our governments are throwing away billions of (currency of choice) for bank bailouts and other large-scale frauds. What are a few millions for something that actually has an extremely tiny probability to return anything, compared to that?

      Compared to money spent on subsidising their "friends", wars, etc., the few coins thrown at scientists aren't even worth mentioning (as long as their findings cannot kill in a more efficient way or keep the powers that be in power, of course).

    6. Re:Ok really? by pelrun · · Score: 1

      Actually establishing communication is a secondary goal - just detecting incidental radio output of an alien civilisation would be a monumental discovery. That said, it does require both sides to have radio capability. So it's probably unlikely that we'll see anything if there are/were only a couple of other inhabited planets out there, but if instead the universe has a lot of life in it, we may get lucky and be in the right place and time to see *one*. If we aren't looking, then even that possibility is wasted.

      Additionally, we're able to see a hell of a long way out there; astronomers are peering deeper and deeper into the universe all the time. If the universe systematically scattered all energy from far away, we wouldn't be able to do that. And in fact, matter that's 'in the way' can be a major advantage, with gravitational lensing.

    7. Re:Ok really? by KibibyteBrain · · Score: 1

      Stars are immensely more powerful, generally point sources than radio telescopes. So while not optimal at all for long range transmission we can still see their image.(after quite a bit of work, knowing or at least suspecting what we are trying to resolve the image to) So again, you are solely reliant on the antenna gain you get with a telescope array to be able to reliably transmit information over long distance, and this gain is only valid for free space or similar attenuation.

    8. Re:Ok really? by 4D6963 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure, although on the other hand there's only so many ways we could be able to detect any eventual technological civilisation, so we might as well try them. I mean think about it, optical systems aren't yet able to resolve a body the size of Earth even if it was around a nearby star, and our probes might find basic life on Mars, in Europe or on Titan, but even if they do that'll be some microbiology crap. If there's some dudes (or super smart land-squids) out there in the sky who mastered electricity the only way we can find out right now is by pointing our radiotelescopic ears and listening carefully. The odds are thin, and I for one think they will be fruitless.

      To add my little bit of worthless speculation : I think that within the 21st century we might be able to detect significant biological activity on other celestial bodies, but either we'll find microbiological stuff in the solar system or we'll only get spectral signs of biological activity on planets, nothing else. I find the odds are awfully small that we'd find anything the SETI way (the fact that we've found nothing for decades means we'd have to be awfully lucky to find something this century), I find it more likely (which is not saying much) that we'd find an alien civilisation's equivalent of a Mars rover on or near Earth. For all we know we might have seen one of them and called it a UFO (among the countless other things we've called UFO).

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    9. Re:Ok really? by khallow · · Score: 2, Funny

      So why not spend research money doing things that we know are going to work.

      "If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research, would it?"

      - Albert Einstein

    10. Re:Ok really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TFA, this was more of an art project than a science project. The engineers and scientists at the telescope seemed to share your sentiments until it became time to transmit, when they apparently changed their attitude. Interesting, isn't it?

    11. Re:Ok really? by kingcrowbar · · Score: 1

      our probes might find basic life on Mars, in Europe or on Titan

      Basic lifeforms discovered in Europe

    12. Re:Ok really? by qmaqdk · · Score: 1

      ... our probes might find basic life on Mars, in Europe or on Titan, but ...

      OMG! I think you're right. There's life everywhere here in Europe.

      --
      My UID is prime. Hah!
    13. Re:Ok really? by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      Oops, yeah I meant Europa.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    14. Re:Ok really? by maxume · · Score: 1

      It probably wouldn't be that scary, the outer planets and moons offer a tremendous amount of resources, and anybody taking the trip just because they noticed us is probably going to be sort of curious about us.

      Also, this particular message is unlikely to get anywhere interesting in our lifetimes (optimistic estimates of medical advancement or not).

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    15. Re:Ok really? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Nothing that can't be handled with a little time travel >_>

    16. Re:Ok really? by wdef · · Score: 1

      Historically when the "guys on the ships" meet the "guys on the shore", the guys on the shore don't do very well.

      Stephen Hawking famously made this point and advised against mindlessly blasting messages at stars. We just never know what is listening and how they might perceive us to be a threat. Their technology and science might be much more advanced than ours and we have no way of knowing what they might be able to do.

      Arguments that an advanced civilization must have learned how to survive peacefully and therefore, if they exist, are all touchy-feely sweethearts may not hold water. We could be sending messages at the galactic equivalent of Hitler or Genghis Khan.

      And yes, I saw "Contact" too and used to watch Dr Who.

    17. Re:Ok really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > our probes might find basic life on Mars, in Europe or on Titan

      In Europe? DOUBT IT!

  10. Yo astronomers, I'm really happy for ya... by b1t+r0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'ma let you finish, but we already got a reply to the original message!

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Yo astronomers, I'm really happy for ya... by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm trying to decode the message. Does it mean something like "Play an Atari 2600 game involving aliens instead of wasting your time on this telescope"?

    2. Re:Yo astronomers, I'm really happy for ya... by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny
  11. Rickroll by arhhook · · Score: 5, Funny

    We could have rickrolled them so they could get a taste of our culture!

    1. Re:Rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Abstruse Goose.

      I love XKCD, but AG:XKCD::Drake-Sagan:ThisGuysRNANoise

    2. Re:Rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hadn't come across that comic before, and was quite impressed until comic 23. The glaringly obvious error in the 95th decimal place spoiled it for me - everyone knows it goes '...5342117067...' Sorry, but with such schoolboy errors staring you in the face, it still has a way to go before it's a real geek comic.

    3. Re:Rickroll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome. But then they would come back and reference a 5 year old meme, oh wait....

  12. The message assumes prior knowledge of our world by Scubaraf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sending out a DNA sequence assumes that the receiver understands a great deal about our planet and the molecular basis of life on it.

    Think about it, even if they understood the message was about DNA, they would have to know our amino acid code in order to interpret it as the template for a protein. A protein that either did not evolve on their world, or evolved in a completely different way.

    In effect, all we saying with this message is that we have advanced enough to recognize that DNA is the basis for life on this planet. Only a sentience that already understood that basis could interpret this message.

    It's akin to someone shouting, "a-squared + b-squared = c-squared!" - out-of-context - in the antarctic. It shows you have learned something, but there either isn't anyone to hear you or they won't understand you unless they knew all about you (and Euclidian geometry) already.

  13. re:arecibo by sleepy_weasel · · Score: 1

    In 35 years, we will get back "whogot votedoff AmericanIdol lastweek?"

    --
    It's all damned lies and statistics!! I mean 47% of all people use statistics to back up their arguments.
  14. Karen Carpenter sang it best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Calling occupants of interplanetary craft

  15. The message was so lame by b1t+r0t · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So if you're going to send a message, you have to choose one. What did he choose? The DNA sequence for an enzyme.

    We used Apple's "Speak" option to vocalize the phonetic code which I then recorded on my iPhone. Here is a fragment of the total message, the whole of which can be decoded unambiguously into the gene for RuBisCo:

    Tell me how, exactly, the recipient is going to decode a DNA sequence, even if the basic message can be identified as strings of 2-bit numbers? Not only is DNA specific (as far as we know) to Earth chemistry, but the meanings of the codons, and even the choice to interpret them in triplets is the result of chance evolution on this planet. It's like sending a message in Navajo to Paris, with the assumption that it can be "decoded unambigiously"... because the sender knew what it meant. The meanings of DNA codons are absolutely not a universal constant like binary math is.

    knowyourself riddleoflife amthe riddleoflife amthe amthe riddleoflife riddleoflife

    <facepalm> Not that the choice of words would mean anything to them, but this shows the touchy-feely-ness that goes along with the lack of foresight that was already demonstrated.

    Say what you will about Sagan's message, but at least they put some thought into making a message that gave hints as to how to decode it, rather than just sending some unframed binary mish-mash.

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:The message was so lame by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny
      [_] They're hoping the aliens will succumb to Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field.
      [_] At our nearest stellar neighbour, Soviet Centaurans serve YOU. (yum yum thx 4 gene seq bzzzt!)
      [_] Your call is important to us. Please stay on the line. Your call is important to us. Please stay ...
      [_] What? Can you hear me now? What? Frakking Aldebaran Telephone and Telecommunications! Get me a Droid!
      [_] Get the base ships ready to jump! We've found the 13th colony!
      [_] Oh shit. Spaceballs! Oh well, there goes the galaxy ...
      [_] What, is your planet still there? The highway goes through next wee, you know!
      [_] The .... answer .... is .... 42 .... point .... (click) Your time is up. Please insert another 50 million galactic credits to call again.
      [_] The borg collective are pissed off at how you've portrayed them. They'll be in your area soon to "discuss it." BTW, we're calling first dibs on your planet.
      [_] Sorry, we don't want any illegal aliens in the neighborhood. Please go to another quadrant or we'll have to report you.
      [_] Why did the zhicvben cross the whowde? To get to the other side! Thank you, thank you. I'm here all diurnal-periods-times-7. Try the phizch.
      [_] That is the most odious and obscene collection of insults and violations of universal taboos any alien race has ever sent our way. Prepare to die, earth scum! We will be avenged!

      Let's hope that either they're not there, or they can't hear us if they are, or if they can hear us, they can't reach us, because the odds are that what we'll have is a failure to communicate.

      we can't even communicate properly between spouses - it's an incredible conceit to think we could get it right first time with an alien species, and not break any taboo, or accidently insult them ... of that they'd be friendly.

      Survival of the fittest means that the predators get to the top of the heap. Don't invite predators unless you *know* that you're better able to defend yourself than they are.

    2. Re:The message was so lame by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 1

      Its like sending an encoded message that itself is an encoded message ;).

    3. Re:The message was so lame by JoshuaZ · · Score: 1

      Not only is DNA specific (as far as we know) to Earth chemistry, but the meanings of the codons, and even the choice to interpret them in triplets is the result of chance evolution on this planet

      We generally suspect this to be true but without other life to compare it to we can't be sure. The thing is there are serious biochemical constraints on what the codons can code for since the tRNA's (chemical structure is related to what amino acid it calls for. Since the tRNA's structure is determined in part by the structure of the messenger RNA which is determined solely by the DNA, there are constraints. They don't look that severe but we don't know.

      We also don't know if there's any serious evolutionary optimization that went on to get our current structure. Right now the suspicion is not much for among other reasons that tampering with your basic system for transcribing proteins from DNA is really likely to result in bad stuff. Note how all life on Earth uses the exact same code (excepting some very very minor things like a handful of organisms that use a 21st amino acid).

      The upshot is that while you are most likely correct, until we see life that evolved elsewhere we won't know for sure. The comparison to languages (which really are completely arbitrary) is thus not great.

    4. Re:The message was so lame by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Did I miss the part in the article(s) where he said what the message actually was? In plain English? I skimmed them but couldn't find anything. Or is it some binary-encoded thing that doesn't actually have any meaning other than as a snippet of DNA?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    5. Re:The message was so lame by baKanale · · Score: 1

      [_] That is the most odious and obscene collection of insults and violations of universal taboos any alien race has ever sent our way. Prepare to die, earth scum! We will be avenged!

      With luck their entire battle fleet, due to a terrible miscalculation of scale, will be accidentally swallowed by a small dog.

    6. Re:The message was so lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But is it art?

  16. Or by Cryacin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's like a radio time capsule.
    Imagine if what becomes of humans in 1 million years or so intercept the transmission. It would be like digging up an old fossil record of DNA.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    1. Re:Or by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      What would make me laugh is if somehow humans were created by time traveling aliens who got our dna and created the first humans based off it. SETI would technically have a hand in self creation. But a galactic emporer named Xenu is much more plausible....

    2. Re:Or by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      BUT---What if Xenu was human? *head explodes*

      Yay causality paradoxes!

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    3. Re:Or by tarius8105 · · Score: 1

      What is Xenu was galactic emperor who had a bounty hunter cloned a million of times so they can fight another army and somehow during one of the battles there was a quantum displacement that sent some back in time to a galaxy far far away.

  17. Contact with aliens on an iphone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    There's an app for that!

  18. Re:iPhone? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Informative

    But they did use an iPhone.

  19. Re:Just don't take any calls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From a link in the first blog posting:

    "Later that decade, Davis led a quasi-covert operation that recorded the vaginal contractions of ballerinas with the Boston Ballet and other women, then translated this impetus of human conception into text, music, phonetic speech and ultimately into radio signals, which were beamed from M.I.T.'s Millstone radar to Epsilon Eridani, Tau Ceti and two other nearby star systems. "

  20. Ouch. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    That was a tough lesson in dream dispersal.

    Did you read the comments on that dude's blog?

    I'd have added some of my own, but I just didn't have the heart.

    Ouch.

    -FL

  21. Representation of the solar system in the message by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 1

    Now that Pluto is no longer a planet, why is it still included in the message? Shouldn't they be sending an updated version?

  22. Lost in translation by CSMatt · · Score: 1

    Given that we didn't beam out the Wikipedia article for the first message, I'm going to try and anticipate what the alien civilization will see it as by deciphering it myself without reading the article first:

    "From top to bottom, the word 'aliens' in white English letters, a purple rock, some Space Invaders, a man with a giant blue head and a staff to his right, some white noise, and a bunch of stars over Planet GMail."

    1. Re:Lost in translation by julesh · · Score: 1

      Given that we didn't beam out the Wikipedia article for the first message, I'm going to try and anticipate what the alien civilization will see it as by deciphering it myself without reading the article first:

      Two things:

      1. Why is wikipedia using SVG to encode what is, basically, a bitmap? Surely a PNG would work much better in this context.
      2. Seriously. WTF is that supposed to mean? OK, I get the top bar, a simple binary count-up with timing indicators, which is simple enough that it unambiguously identifies the width of the image and should be obvious enough to any intelligence that understands place-based number systems (which is to say, likely anything with the technology to receive the message). But what purpose does the rest of it serve? Even with a cultural understanding of Earth I'm struggling to grasp what it's all about.

  23. Re:iPhone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The amazing thing is, we did it with my iPhone!"

    ". . . sequence into an analog audio file that I recorded on my iPhone. Then, we actually interfaced my iPhone with. . . "

    "Now I have the coolest iPhone in the world."

    It's a cell phone, smartphone, mobile, handset, pda, whatever you want to call it. It fits in a category of electronic device that includes hundreds of others. But no, it can't be lowered and referred to by any generic name, it's an iPhone!

    Considering that a piece of shite $15 mp3 player could have been used for the task just as well, such glowing praise and repeated brand name acknowledgement is truly not necessary. It makes Apple's marketing dept quite happy, however.

  24. Re:iPhone? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Exactly. I don’t think the phone model would have been mentioned (and with a wink nonetheless) that way if it were another phone.

    Besides: Even a iPhone that sent stuff to another planet and got a reply, can’t beat a Linux running Nokia N900 with built-in full root access, from a company whose phones had SSH terminal software available for more than seven years now. </proper-geek-fanboyism> ;)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  25. Not endorsed by vadim_t · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Why is it that some guy is taking the liberty to send anything he pleases to the aliens?

    I mean, if we're going to seriously entretain the idea that some day some other civilization might receive the message, then such things should be planned carefully to be as meaningful, easily decodable and as non-threatening as possible lest it bite us in the ass some day. That excludes random people with access to the hardware sending messages just because they can out of their own initiative.

    Just for a start, iPhone text to speech? There has to be some better way to encode a DNA sequence that would more obvious to decode that machine-generated voice in a human language.

    And, if we're not really taking this seriously and this is just a gimmick, why bother in the first place? Surely there has to be some better use of the equipment.

  26. Give it up, man by jbatista · · Score: 1

    Just give it up, she's, er I mean they, are just not interested in you.

    --
    My sig is better than your sig.
  27. Useless message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What. A. Useless. Message.

    The message is nearly meaningless noise. There is structure, but not so much as to not be unambitiously random. The chances are that if anyone gets the message they'd assume it was just noise. What a horrible waste. We would have done so much better sending an obvious integer sequence a few times: more obvious in the presence of noise, and more likely to be recognized as meaningful by a foreign life.

    No wonder they didn't want to help this guy out, he's obviously a cargo-cult-wannabe-scientist. "I play with beakers and transmitters, so I'm a scientist too".

      Sure— SETI things are more about understanding ourselves and pushing the technological boundaries. But that understanding comes from deep and considered thought about these issues, not by sending some artists to play scientist on some expensive equipment.

  28. Dangerous by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Insightful

    We have no idea if the receiver is friendly. Based on human behavior, we can roughly guess that at least 10% of any/all intelligent receivers will be agressive. Why broadcast our location with those odds? It's not logical.

    1. Re:Dangerous by weeeeed · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, because we already broadcast enough, so sending yet another message does not really matter anymore. What I worry is our regular TV programming, which in the eyes of any advanced culture should make earth look like it's populated with some crazy monkeys flinging shit at each other.

    2. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've been broadcasting our position ever since Marconi played with sparks. In some wavelengths (radio, TV, mobile phones, radar, ...), the earth has been *by orders of magnitude* the brightest object in the sky. So we've been this beacon for more than a century now; we don't have much to loose by trying to set up intelligent communication. (not that this is a criticism on the inaneness of what we've been broadcasting until now ;-))

      Moreover, we got where we are by being curious, not by being aggressive. Survival of the fittest has brought us where we were 5000 years ago, in about 5 million years. Curiosity has brought us from where we were 5000 years ago to where we are now. Compare the rate of change, and it's quite clear what's the more effective way of progress. You can bet that anything that can interpret these messages and has the capacity to do something with them will know that.

    3. Re:Dangerous by cpghost · · Score: 1

      Whether we imagine aliens to be friend of foe tells a lot about our own perception and mind set. And this perception changed dramatically over the decades up to a point where pop culture (or sci-fi too) overwhelmingly considers aliens to be a threat. It wasn't so earlier. How comes that? Another point to ponder is this: if an alien culture were able to travel faster than light (and receive our signals before they arrived, but let's not be distracted by that), they would also be immensely more advanced than us, and would have paid us a (deadly of friendly) visit a long time ago since we started radio and TV broadcasting... if they thought we were worthy enough for a visit at all.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
    4. Re:Dangerous by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Why broadcast our location with those odds? It's not logical.

            It is logical if you take the position that WE are the agressive ones. Like you pointed out, broadcasting a signal is a sign of confidence - first it shows that we have the technology to do it (note the lack of signals being received from us - perhaps we're the most advanced!) and second that we have the interest to do it, and the confidence to deal with the consequences.

            Now there is a possible scenario where the xenos (if they exist) have moved beyond radio, or are just lying in wait passively listening for radio signals in order to pounce - but that's a rather paranoid view isn't it?

            Either way, I would enjoy a little green alien pet, or on the other hand, being some alien's little pink pet...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    5. Re:Dangerous by east+coast · · Score: 0

      Any alien civilization with the means to harm us in any way doesn't need a radio signal to find us. They're well beyond that stage.

      When/If we ever find intelligent life out there, we will observe them for many generations before we ever have the means to visit them.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
    6. Re:Dangerous by vlm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Based on human behavior, we can roughly guess that at least 10% of any/all intelligent receivers will be agressive.

      Really want to mess with your head? Try this on for size. Based on human behavior, we can roughly guess that at least 90% of any/all intelligent receivers will believe in some form of supernatural friend in the sky whom runs the whole show. Now how are they going to freak out when a dude in the sky starts talking to them?

      See, now slashdotters whom watch too much BSG are worried about fighting the cylons, but the average (and below average) moron on the street is going to be worried about the supernatural implications.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    7. Re:Dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I worry is our regular TV programming, which in the eyes of any advanced culture should make earth look like it's populated with some crazy monkeys flinging shit at each other.

      Wow. I wonder what an alien would think if he/she/it receives MTV and watches Next or Pimp My Ride !

    8. Re:Dangerous by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Only 10%? It's pretty much 100%, from the sample size we know (sample = 1 planet, dominant lifeform is extremely aggressive predator). If we hadn't been aggressive, we wouldn't be the dominant life form - something else would be, and we'd be their cows and goats and pigs.

      On a galactic scale, the most aggressive life form will wipe out the others - so by the time they find out about us, they've probably had lots of experience. They're more likely to say "Nuke them from orbit - it's the only way to be sure" than to be peaceful in any first contact scenario.

    9. Re:Dangerous by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Moreover, we got where we are by being curious, not by being aggressive.

      We got where we are (top of the food chain) by being aggressive. We can afford the luxury of being curious, but we're still the most aggressive animal on the planet. Don't believe it? Look at what we watch for entertainment - stories about murders and rapes are okay, natural expressions of affection and reproduction are taboo.

    10. Re:Dangerous by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Either way, I would enjoy a little green alien pet, or on the other hand, being some alien's little pink pet...

      So you would welcome your overlords from the planet goatse?

    11. Re:Dangerous by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Following that line of thought, I wonder what aliens would think if the first images they received of our species was goatse...

            "Ohh, what a strange mouth. And look, it has pedipalps. Funny how they put the eyes on the back of the critter though, and how it breathes just next to its butt-hole..."

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:Dangerous by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      But on Zergtron, they eat their gods.

    13. Re:Dangerous by wdef · · Score: 1

      ... which in the eyes of any advanced culture should make earth look like it's populated with some crazy monkeys flinging shit at each other.

      Sounds like an accurate description. You must have watched UK Parliament broadcasts, right?

  29. My thoughts exactly by interactive_civilian · · Score: 1

    Even if we make the assumption of organic life, which isn't far-fetched given all of the awesome self-organizing things organic molecules (biotic or abiotic) can do, we have as yet no reason to assume that nucleic acids will be the information carrier in an alien life form. Even if we do assume that nucleic acids are the information carrier, we have no reason to assume that the genetic code is universal.

    The evolution of the genetic code is perhaps the biggest mystery in the origins of life on Earth. We are only just beginning to set down a reasonable framework in which to put forth testable hypotheses, but still yet have no way of determining whether the genetic code as it evolved on Earth is the only thermodynamically favorable outcome for such a system, or if it was a fixed accident. There has been some interesting mathematical treatment of the evolution of the genetic code, but nothing conclusive on the mechanisms of its origins. It does seem that molecular biology and studies of molecular evolution are coming into their own in this respect, so answers may not be so many years off, but we still have quite a way to go in our understanding.

    Considering that the genetic code itself is somewhat evolvable (there are a couple of organisms, bacteria IIRC, that have reassigned one of their duplicate codons for a 21st amino acid), there really isn't any good reason to assume that alien life forms, even if biochemically similar in most other respects, would have the same genetic code. For all we know, we may have just sent off a good bit of nonsense (genetically speaking), even if they could decode the sequence and understand it as a nucleic acid sequence.

    It seems to me that it would make much more sense to send something mathematical: a sequence of primes, a Fibonacci sequence, or some other sequence that would never appear as a "natural" unintelligent signal. Something like that would be an unmistakable sign of intelligent life (at least intelligent enough to work out math and send it in a signal). Sending a genetic code seems like a complete waste of time (disregarding those who think that sending any kind of signal is a waste of time).

    --
    "Empathise with stupidity, and you're halfway to thinking like an idiot." - Iain M. Banks
  30. Re: transmission lag by neonsignal · · Score: 1

    I guess that rules out Quake then...

  31. You did WHAT?!? by YourExperiment · · Score: 2, Funny

    You do realise that sending a message with an Apple product is tantamount to declaring war? Goddammit, did you not see that documentary with the MacBook?

  32. Arecibo message already answered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in August 15, 1977.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wow_signal

    1. Re:Arecibo message already answered... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Wow_signal

      Nah, they just accidentally farted with the mike on. They are otherwise ignoring us.
           

  33. Alien response by matrixownsyou · · Score: 0

    "stfu already"

  34. Again? by jandersen · · Score: 3, Funny

    I wonder if we are going to get one back: "Can you keep the ^%£$&^$*$&^ noise down!"

  35. They should have resent the original message. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Arecibo message was designed to be as easy as possible to decode, it would be possible to do so with just a pencil and paper.

    They should keep sending this same Arecibo message each time, rather than making cleverer and more complex ones.
    The reason for this is that the content is not so important, compared to the importance of allowing another species to recognise and decode it.
    The alien species could correlate the signals they received, and multiple copies of the same bit pattern over time would stand out above random noise.
    If a different one is sent each time, it would look more like noise.

    Twenty five years is nothing compared to the time scales involved in interstellar travel, and indeed interstellar radio communication.
    Lets keep this simple and not try to get clever with it.

    1. Re:They should have resent the original message. by Sockatume · · Score: 2, Informative

      Definitely, sending the same message repeatedly is better than sending multiple messages in different encoding schemes. However:

      The Arecibo message was designed to be as easy as possible to decode, it would be possible to do so with just a pencil and paper.

      Designed, sure. I recall reading that it was nigh-impenetrable in practice, and it flip-flops between ways of encoding the same data at various points (e.g. it introduces a scheme for writing binary in limited space in the first part, then ditches it in favour of just extending the space in the second) which is hardly conducive to understanding. It should've been edited, then retransmitted. That way it would still stand out, but it would give some clues as to what it's actually meant to say.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  36. 97% of statistics are made up to make a point by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    "Based on human behavior" how? 1 in 10 of our responses to alien messages have been aggressive? 1 in 10 of humans would lead an interstellar invasion fleet according to polls? I'm curious.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:97% of statistics are made up to make a point by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I don't understand your question or criticism. It may be that you mis-interpreted my statement. It's true we don't know the nature of aliens, but that's why we have to be careful. The default assumption should NOT be that they are friendly.

      Plus, they may have a different idea of "being friendly" than we do. "Of Mice and Men" comes to mind, for example (which Bugs Bunny's Abominable Snowman parodies relatively well).

    2. Re:97% of statistics are made up to make a point by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      That's perfectly reasonable, but it's not really what you posted in the first instance (that we can assume from human behavior that they are hostile, which involves a lot of assumptions).

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:97% of statistics are made up to make a point by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      You are right, it could have been worded better. Perhaps I should have used the phrase "extrapolate from human behavior" (being that we have no other model at this time).
         

  37. Interstellar Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theres an app for that

  38. don't worry by aepervius · · Score: 1

    Regular broadcast is already attenuated so much , that it is virtually indistinguishable from noise a few dozen AU from our planet...

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  39. Re:Representation of the solar system in the messa by Bakkster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pluto is a planet, it's just one of 5 dwarf planets. So yes, to be completely accurate, they'd either need to ditch Pluto or add Ceres, Haumea, Makemake, and Eris.

    All that said, I'm guessing 'ET' woouldn't give two shits about the dwarf planets. He'd see the gas giants, and maybe our 4 inner planets. If they looked really close, they might see some assorted rocky and icy belts, but nothing worth mentioning compared to the other planets.

    Of course, part of the idea of dwarf planets is to make them open ended, so you don't need to memorize all of them. The analogy is to mountains: there are lots of mountains, people don't memorize them all, but they're still given special recognition.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  40. Indeed! by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    Don't even joke about that. What are the odds that they're going to be able to see an object as small as Pluto?

    "I'm counting four rocky inner planets, four gas giants, and... well, shit, there's no ninth planet. Moving on..."

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:Indeed! by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      Don't even joke about that. What are the odds that they're going to be able to see an object as small as Pluto?

      "I'm counting four rocky inner planets, four gas giants, and... well, shit, there's no ninth planet. Moving on..."

      What are the odds they CAN'T detect Pluto?

      "Haha, those primitive monkeys haven't even figured out their own solar system! LOL!!!1"

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
  41. Glass half full of aliens by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    Or they might stop and say, "Oh, hey! We were about to build a hyperspace bypass through your solar system. But now that we know it's inhabited, we'll reroute that and give you an on-ramp. And by the way, here's the technology for zero-point energy, faster-than-light communication, and the meaning of life. Welcome to the club!"

    1. Re:Glass half full of aliens by vertinox · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, hey! We were about to build a hyperspace bypass through your solar system. But now that we know it's inhabited, we'll reroute that and give you an on-ramp.

      Haven't I read this from somewhere before... Except they didn't reroute the hyperspace bypass.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:Glass half full of aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And here's your tax bill."

  42. Re:Just don't take any calls by sorak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pointless Calculation...

    What if they tried to send the exact same information to a neighbor, using Verizon wireless...

    As a text message:

    Base Pairs in DNA: 3,080,000,000

    Total # Characters 6,160,000,000.00
    Text Message Limit 160
    # Text Messages: 38,500,000.00

    Rate per Text Message: $0.20
    Cost: $7,700,000.00

    Using Verizon's 1.99/MB data rate:
    Megabytes Data 770
    Cost Per Megabyte $1.99
    Total Cost $1,532.30

    Mailing a Baggy full of sperm:
    44 cents.

    Seeing the look on your neighbor's face when she opens her envelope:
    priceless

  43. The ad reborn by arthurpaliden · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Can you hear me now?"

  44. Wasted money by AlpineR · · Score: 1

    "Ok, I understand the 'coolness' factor of radio transmissions to the stars, but in the end are they all wasted money?"

    Now I will have to balance books. I applied for two small grants to help me do this. Both were denied. I was not funded by MIT, the government, or anyone else to carry out this project. It has been expensive, at least, from my point of view. I do have the coolest iPhone now, so how can I complain? Who knows who's going to be calling back?

    The only "wasted" money is his own. Let a man do something cool with his life without being criticized for adding billions to the federal deficit. As something of a romantic, I'd hope that he could make enough money selling that iPhone to a collector of mankind's First Contact artifacts to pay for the trip.

  45. From my experience... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope he has family or friends on M13 or that M13 is within his calling plan. Otherwise he will need significant funding.

  46. DNA Sequence? by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

    Alien #1: We're getting a weird signal from that yellow star.

    Alien #2: I thought I told you not to bother with yellow stars and only listen to the orange ones - yellow stars won't have INTELLIGENT life.

    Alien #1: But this signal it's definately not natural, look at it.

    Alien #2: Smeg!, not astronomical phenomena known could make this signal it appears so, so random.

    Alien #1: Let's try to decipher it.

    Alien #2: Oh lets!

    They try and try, but there is just no rhyme nor reason to the signal. Also it is never repeated, so it is assumed to be locally generated noise. It's called the 'Smegma Signal' and is a popular subject among those aliens who are known to wear tinfoil trousers to protect their brains from 'psychic waves'. The other aliens assume they probably sat down to hard when they were a larvae and tore a nerve bundle or three.

    --
    ...
  47. Everytime in 35 years is too infrequent.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No wonder why we can't find intelligent life out there. There is probably several thousand really interesting alien civilizations out there and they each are sitting there wondering if they are the only ones out there. So, every 35 years they send a brief message out into the universe expecting one of the other civilizations to notice that particular transmission over all the background noise. Of course, they each justify it because of lack of funding but they really shouldn't complain when they don't find intelligent civilizations either.

    On top of that, sending a DNA sequence is simply stupid. If I were to receive a message from an alien civilization, I'd be far more interested in their sciences, culture, and theology than a short sample of their DNA. I'm not sure what I'd do with that.

  48. Re:Representation of the solar system in the messa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Orcus? Why is Orcus left off of everyone's list of dwarf planes? I know there might be too many to memorize but it's a cool little anti-pluto.

  49. Returned Message: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No thanks. Earth (particularly, U.S.A) is brain-dead.

    Yours in Baikonur (Cosmodrome),
    Kilgore T.

  50. Re:Dangerous [bear analogy] by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    But TV etc. is done to serve a (local) purpose. Beaming a signal into space is done merely to beam a signal into space. Your TV comparison is like saying, "Well, since I ate M&Ms at camp, the bears might already know about us. Therefore, I'll heat up this chocolate bar and blow the scent into the forest with a fan".

    Anyhow, I've heard that radar is probably the most detectable signal we send out, not TV and radio.
         

  51. Re:Representation of the solar system in the messa by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Maybe they need to include Pluto so everyone who gets both messages will recognize it's the same spammer that keeps bothering them with infomercials.

  52. Re: transmission lag by prozaker · · Score: 1

    forget quake, what about interstellar pr0nz

  53. Amanda Seyfried/Julianne Moore love scene? Check! by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > The message encoded a DNA sequence

    Great. Now they'll shove it into a machine and start cranking out babies to see what they're like.

    Indeed, from their tech level, it'll prolly be trivial to "simulate" an actual planetfull of people, to see how they'd behave and treat one another and then they'd find out that we're all nasty sacks of...

    Uhhh. Oh oh.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  54. Meanwhile in another galaxy... by marqs · · Score: 0

    "Damn, I just get a busy tone when trying to call Earth. They are official deleted from my phone book!"

  55. I sense a science fiction plot.. by Simulant · · Score: 1

    Alien race re-creates humans based on DNA sequence received from Arecibo. Hilarity ensues....

  56. Re:iPhone? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    So? Who cares? Is it relevant to the story - I mean, do they tell us what the model of all the computers they use? What about the companies involved in the construction of the radio telescope?

    The sad thing is, this probably wouldn't have made Slashdot if another phone had been used.

    I agree with the other poster too - if he had have used another phone, it wouldn't have been mentioned. Because most people just get on and use products - they don't stop and say "Hey isn't this cool, I can do this on my Iphone", giving a free advert to Apple, even though everyone else can do the same thing.

    - I'm posting this using a Windows PC with Intel Core Duo processor *ding dong ding dong* -

  57. Only one thing good about it by mattr · · Score: 1

    It is nice he provided a good bit of PR on the web for Arecibo. The bit about using an iPod is essential to his artistic statement I suppose, "coolest iPod in the world" is maybe something that could have gotten Apple to fund Arecibo if he had been at all interested in it. That would have gotten the director on his side too.

    May I suggest the one thing we should NOT send is our DNA sequences.

    1) Low security. If they were able to do anything with it I would be pretty worried! Sending them the key to our metabolism is a Bad Idea.
    2) Impossible to fully decode without knowledge of Earth biology.
    3) A very inefficient signal. A better message could have been devised, with much more fun and stimulation, by a competent university department.
    4) I have a problem with a guy who says this sort of thing to Arecibo's interim director. It is typical wannabe bullshit. I've worked with artists but none would have the balls to go to a scientific research center and tell them that SETI is not about finding aliens. As if he had never read Contact.

    I explained that projects concerned with the search for extraterrestrial intelligence are really more about a search for ourselves; that they make us look much more intensely at ourselves than we look away into space and that nobody seems to see that part of it. I wanted to make clear to him that this was not really a project about “aliens”.

    1. Re:Only one thing good about it by mattr · · Score: 1

      On closer reading of part 2 I notice the iPod was a last minute solution to using the antenna before they made it impossible to do so, so this part was a neat hack. Still I have problems with the artist's basic lack of interest in sending a message that can be understood (beyond providing punctuation). A bitmap made from his iSight and edited down to icon size would have been better. He could have made a flip book animation even. Ah well, he did it, I didn't.

  58. Re:Representation of the solar system in the messa by Bakkster · · Score: 1

    Because Orcus hasn't been recognized by the IAU yet. Sedna and Vesta, as well.

    --
    Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
  59. Greg Bear by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 1

    Greg Bear's Forge of God and Anvil of Stars books cover this too. Basically, civilisations that don't learn to shield emissions early on in their development attract von Neumann machines that pre-emptively attack noisy civilisations before they become interstellar. There's a galactic organisation that tries to rescue targeted civilisations, and punish the makers of the probes.
    FoG covers the Earth getting destroyed (no spoiler necessary, the cover depicts Earth going boom) and Anvil follows Earth's children as they are guided on a mission of revenge - great books, IMHO.

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  60. messages to outer space, how about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    messages to outer space, how about

    ERROR:404 page not found

    or

    Cheep vaigar, canadian pharmasy