Slashdot Mirror


Farmville, Social Gaming, and Addiction

MarkN writes "Facebook has been trumpeting the fact that Farmville, the most popular game on its site, has more users than Twitter, with 69 million playing over a month and 26 million playing each day. Combined with Facebook's announcement that they have hit 350 million users, that means one out of every five people on Facebook is playing Farmville. Gamasutra has a post taking a critical analysis of Farmville, its deceptively slow level grind, how a number of gameplay features end up as simply decorative since they aren't balanced with the benefits of raising crops, and discussing why Farmville succeeds so well in virally spreading itself and addicting people."

251 comments

  1. Levels! by aBaldrich · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    It's the first MMORPG-like game not considered geek: it's played by women.

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    1. Re:Levels! by Relic+of+the+Future · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nah, dude; women play other MMOPGs, and have been for a long time. They just pretend to be men so that guys who post off-topic sexist remarks to /. (and the guys who mod those guys up) will stop harassing them.

      --
      Those who fail to understand communication protocols, are doomed to repeat them over port 80.
    2. Re:Levels! by kaizokuace · · Score: 1

      when you say women i assume you exclude all the female WoW players yes?

      --
      Balderdash!
    3. Re:Levels! by Darkness404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not really, there are lots of MMORPG-style games that attract a lot of women players (think pet sites like Neopets), its just Farmville has a large amount of players because of A) the incentive to recruit (you can get gifts from people) B) The need to come back constantly (otherwise your crops die) and C) Coming back regularly improves the game (even if your crops might not die if you don't get there right as they are ready, but you can plant more crops then). Mix all that with the social networking side of it (anyone can see the farm and you can post pictures) and the decorating side of it (lots of items to decorate) and you have an MMO that many women enjoy.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Levels! by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      Cheers mate. I'm female, and an avid WoWer. When I joined a guild and said "hey guys", another female got angry for assuming she was male... I call everyone 'guys', figure of speech for me. No ammount of reassuring that I was female calmed her down, ended up on Vent just to prove it. Pretty much everyone knows chicks play WoW, you get the occasional tool but meh... you get that IRL too. :)

    5. Re:Levels! by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      Ok, thanks for the flame. I'd rather say it has roughly the same ammount female and male players, which is not common for *most* pc games.
      "To date, men still outnumber female players" in WoW. (http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/309775/women_and_world_of_warcraft.html)
      And in Runescape "There really are quite a few of us" says a woman in her blog (http://www.blogcatalog.com/blog/the-runescape-wilderness-a-runescape-related-blog-by-the-maker-of-meilis-rs-pics-website/25fa5a67d904a250e4e4712c6105c7de)
      I could cite numbers from DD fanclubs, gaming tournaments, etc, but I'm probably going to get modded down so its not worth the time.
      Farmville did manage to get a new market.

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    6. Re:Levels! by roguetrick · · Score: 1

      I found some enjoyment out of Farmville for a short time. I created Atari characters and penises with trees and crops.

      --
      -The world would be a better place if everyone had a hoverboard
    7. Re:Levels! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a girl in a MMORPG, you can also pretend not to speak english, and they will stop harassing you, if only to stop you from spouting lines from Pinocchio in Italian

    8. Re:Levels! by gangien · · Score: 1

      i use hay bales and create nintendo characters.

  2. Something I overheard by alex_guy_CA · · Score: 5, Funny

    Something I overheard: "Can I grow weed on Farmvile and sell it on Mafia Wars?"

    1. Re:Something I overheard by Tellarin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Where are my mod point when I need them?! :)

    2. Re:Something I overheard by Dr_Ken · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      --
      "If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff."
    3. Re:Something I overheard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Something I overheard:

      "Can I grow weed on Farmvile and sell it on Mafia Wars?"

      You can grow it to sell to the local pot club. If you earn enough points to get cancer you can even use it in the game.

    4. Re:Something I overheard by Chmcginn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, Can I send troops from Tribal Wars to attack my brother-in-laws Farm that keeps spamming me with "So-and-so bought a cow!"?

      --
      Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
    5. Re:Something I overheard by marqs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Think opium pays better

    6. Re:Something I overheard by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That would actually make these 'games' worth while.

    7. Re:Something I overheard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got you covered.

    8. Re:Something I overheard by Firehed · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You probably should be able to - both games are run by the same company.

      Of course, you should also be able to order hits on all of your friends playing FarmVille, so this cross-game thing may not be the best idea after all.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    9. Re:Something I overheard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apparently you don't understand that Slashdot is not a game. The whole point of using moderator points is to help make other people's Slashdot reading experiences more valuable. And if you don't want to contribute in that way, then just ignore any moderation points you've been given. They'll eventually expire and other people who actually care to contribute will take care of things.

    10. Re:Something I overheard by LurkerXD · · Score: 1

      Actually since they recently added the ability to grow flowers, I was wondering what level unlocks Poppies...

    11. Re:Something I overheard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      only if you have a green card!!!!!

    12. Re:Something I overheard by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      No, but you can grow weed and sell it to your friends. Its the same idea as Farmville/Mafia Wars only it will get you into a heap load of trouble with the law if you get caught.

    13. Re:Something I overheard by lamapper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something I overheard: "Can I grow weed on Farmville and sell it on Mafia Wars?"

      That is funny, but you hit a good point. Since most of the FaceBook games ONLY allow FaceBook users, there is little incentive to share between social networks. This will probably change this next year (if a company is confident theirs is the superior social game for that genre, they should not be afraid to share the API with other social networks, even if owned by another company...of course if they are afraid that they are not good enough, the fear will keep them from opening up their api. It would probably bring them even more users...Note: FaceBook will NOT be the first, their business model is too closed for now, but as new players enter and start opening up their API, as people naturally move to the more open and therefore socially superior environment, they will have to open up or diminish.).

      It makes perfect sense for a person in Farmville or Farmtown (different companies I know) grow food and use that food in their Restaurant on Restaurant City. One day, just not today.

      If you grow weed on your farm and use it in Mafia wars, should that not open the door for these two scenarios as well...1) Different Mafias coming (only to your farm) and taking it over? 2) The FarmVille police, sheriff, DEA, etc... from paying you a visit?

      I wonder if second life will allow you to control your legal framework of your community, so if you wanted to legalize certain drugs, etc...Why should your community not be allowed to. Wouldn't it be something if you could share resources between Second Life, FaceBook and others?

      I think its called trade in the real world...makes sense if you want the experience to be more realistic. Of course given the size of people to animals to structures in either Farmville or Farmtown, it is not as real as it should be. Perhaps when they dump flash and start coding in C, PHP, perhaps C++ if not limited to one companies compiler they could implement a Google Earth like 3 dimensional virtual environment, like Second life is now but in Farmville, Restaurant City and Farmtown among others....

      Just as Farmville usurped Farmtown's lead, the first company to get away from Flash and move the virtual world to a more robust and feature rich tool set will blow Farmville away. Such a world will not crash because of Flash and that in and of itself will be a huge plus.

      --
      Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
    14. Re:Something I overheard by darthnoodles · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would be funny. But not as funny as getting horse heads in FarmVille for use in Mafia Wars.

    15. Re:Something I overheard by Stavr0 · · Score: 1

      I have just the opposite problem. I'd like to launder my ${Criminal} Wars proceeds in FarmVille -- 1.5B$ a day VS $1 Farmville dollar a week.

  3. Idle! by deprecated · · Score: 0

    Deliberately not going to RTFA because it sounds like a buzzkill in the name of overanalysis. Also, "duh!"

  4. FarmTown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, then there's FarmTown, almost the exact same game. That's the annoying bit about Facebook apps, everyone one has at least two or three near duplicates.

    1. Re:FarmTown by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 1, Funny

      everyone one ... duplicates

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    2. Re:FarmTown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, then there's FarmTown, almost the exact same game. That's the annoying bit about Facebook apps, everyone one has at least two or three near duplicates.

    3. Re:FarmTown by Evro · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I may be wrong, but my understanding is that FarmVille is a nearly complete ripoff of FarmTown, and FarmTown has a lot more interesting features (interaction with other players, etc).

      --
      rooooar
    4. Re:FarmTown by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      What is this the App Store? Mini-Clip? 3d Platformers? You can't have that many duplicates in a service right?

    5. Re:FarmTown by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the graphics in FarmTown aren't as nice. IMHO.

    6. Re:FarmTown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, its only Zynga. They copy any game they think might be interesting, improve the graphics and monetize on it. They got about a dozen games now I think.

    7. Re:FarmTown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep yep and Farmalooza is just like both of them but better...... and only in my head

  5. Just seems like... by Lord+Duran · · Score: 4, Informative

    a glorified version of Harvest Moon.

    1. Re:Just seems like... by heson · · Score: 1

      The description I heard was: Farmville relates to real games as masturbation relates to real sex.

    2. Re:Just seems like... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      That's funny, since I've already heard that games -> real life as masturbation -> sex. Which raises the question: sex -> masturbation as masturbation -> ...?

  6. Remember the privacy policy? by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hey, 1 in 5 people use this application. Remember that once the application has more than a million users, it can access not only your personal information, but everyone's personal information you can access. So, in short, the creators of Farmville have access to most, if not all, of the Facebook database. Moo, moo.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Phillibuster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think it's more accurate to say 1 in 5 accounts have Farmville. I know people who have created several dummy accounts to help their 'friend' quoata. This also benefits Facebook by inflating their user count - how many of the 350 'users' are distinct people?

    2. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Dr_Ken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Kind of begs the question "who is farming and for what?"

      --
      "If you want to know what happens to you when you die, go look at some dead stuff."
    3. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by scolbe · · Score: 2, Informative

      not only that, but how many of those accounts actually play the game?
      I had a look at it a while ago and half the people who 'play' it.. well appear to have planted a few crops and then never touched it again.

      --
      Lead me not into temptation... I can find it myself 8+)
    4. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by girlintraining · · Score: 4, Funny

      Kind of begs the question "who is farming and for what?"

      Please proceed immediately to the next thread, as the effects of prolonged exposure to this question has not been investigated. *fzzt* As an optional test protocol, we are pleased to present an amusing fact. The personal data is now more valuable than the organs and combined incomes of everyone in your hometown.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      They really are all distinct. But i still am wondering why my dog, rabbit, fish, bird need a own facebook account. It seems that you need more neighbours to level up in farmville.

      But if you are wondering, 3 out of 5 farmville players are (real) female. Maybe something interesting for /.players.

    6. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by u38cg · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Call me Mr Grumpy Pants, but my ideal woman is not someone whose idea of a fulfilling life is playing some stupid flash game.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    7. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by legojenn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Call me Ms Grumpypants, but my ideal man is not someone whose idea of a fulfilling life is playing some stupid first-person shooter game.

      --
      I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.
    8. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Firehed · · Score: 1

      This number reflects reported monthly active users. Or more accurately, monthly active accounts - plenty of those accounts share a single warm body.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    9. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your instincts are correct. I know someone who married a girl addicted to these games. She just lies there all day and night with a laptop warming her ever expanding carcass, bellowing for people to join the various "games".

    10. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by ShakaUVM · · Score: 4, Funny

      >>Call me Mr Grumpy Pants, but my ideal woman is not someone whose idea of a fulfilling life is playing some stupid flash game.

      My wonderful wife is downstairs playing Harvest Moon on the Wii.

      She's not only beautiful, but this also gives me time to play Dragon Age.

    11. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      O M G ! You two need to hook up!

    12. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by dswensen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your ideal woman probably is a flash game.

    13. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, it "raises the question". "begging the question" is a type of logical fallacy.

      http://begthequestion.info/

    14. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Remember that once the application has more than a million users, it can access not only your personal information, but everyone's personal information you can access.

      You can disable that.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    15. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Call me Mr Grumpy Pants, but my ideal woman is not someone whose idea of a fulfilling life is playing some stupid flash game.

      Excellent. Means there's more to go around for the rest of us.

      And in other news...never, ever, let your new gf play plants vs zombies on your pc. You'll have to buy a second pc just to be able to browse slashdot.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    16. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Daniel+Weis · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the information. I just disabled it.

    17. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Begging the question" has been used so much to mean "raising the question" that that is now considered an acceptable use. And its use in that manner actually sounds quite appropriate, for the great majority of people who have never heard the "other" use. I think the logicians will just have to come up with a better phrase for their own use.

    18. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by u38cg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get thee away with your heteronormativity.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    19. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by t.lark · · Score: 1

      Remember that once the application has more than a million users, it can access not only your personal information, but everyone's personal information you can access.

      You can disable that.

      Shit! How did you get my facebook password?!

    20. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by RKThoadan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing that gives you an excuse to buy another PC is bad.

    21. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by AP31R0N · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about watching millionaires play sports?

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    22. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember this. "Begging the question" involves neither begging nor a question.

    23. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a farming flash game? They should at least be playing Cooking Mama, or a laundry game.

    24. Re:Remember the privacy policy? by cachapa · · Score: 1

      WTF!!!
      Thanks, man!

  7. So, it's a cross between... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that smattering of myminicity spam we had a few years ago, and Slashdot's use of exponents for achievements such as "most consecutive days logged in", right? :)

  8. 2 thoughts by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Security and "China farmers".

    First, the security issue is an obvious one, when you're tempted to hand out your password so someone can "babysit" your farm.

    The other one would be an interesting one indeed. So far, I doubt any online farming game (usually browser games) got big enough to even attract "goldsellers", whatever form they may take. Now, I neither have a facebook account nor play this game, so someone who does might be able to give me a hint whether it's possible to hand over money (or whatever resource there is) in the game, but it would be interesting to see what the owners of Facebook think of a sudden dramatic increase of new users who all just play this game, know each other and basically are nothing but a huge grinder farm (no pun intended). I'd guess they wouldn't be too happy since it would poison their data pool quite a bit.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:2 thoughts by Danoz · · Score: 1, Interesting

      doesn't really matter too much, facebook is blocked in china anyway.

    2. Re:2 thoughts by Penguinisto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Err, if you know you're going to be out for awhile, you simply plant stuff that grows slower, or don't plant anything.

      I (admittedly) do play this thing on occasion, and I don't really see anything in there that would make your classic 'gold farmer' ('scuse the pun) see it as worth their time. Few folks buy the bucks in-game as it is, and unlike Mafia Wars style games, a bot would be fairly useless.

      I could've summed the game down in two sentences: It's a cute-but-silly animated time waster that occasionally begs you to buy stuff. Its general appeal lies in the fact that unlike most games, you help other players to advance instead of beating them down.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..a bot would be fairly useless.

      I scripted a bot to generate the mouse-clicks required to harvest, plow and replant, saving myself some RSI. Then I read about what a bunch of bastards the cretins running Zynga are, so I deleted the app.

    4. Re:2 thoughts by Firehed · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many facebook games (Farmville included) have eliminated the need for gold farmers by selling the currency (or other in-game items) themselves. In fact, it's one of if not the largest revenue stream for many of them, in addition to ad sales. They figured out what Blizzard et al haven't - people are willing to pay cash for game currency, so it might as well be the game developers who are doing the selling.

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    5. Re:2 thoughts by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      You also help the poor, scared animals instead of, you know, eating them. I don't know a single farmer that's a vegetarian...

    6. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell me how Blizzard has not figured it out? Or maybe they figured out that if they allow people to buy currency et al, they will quit the game faster resulting is smaller subscription base? Maybe they know wtf they are doing...

    7. Re:2 thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blizzard know this, they just aren't ready to ruin their game's risk vs reward system just yet. That's why they're only using RWT for things like pets.

    8. Re:2 thoughts by nsteinme · · Score: 1

      In Blizzard's defense, I assume they are trying to keep the game fair, so that your character's progress, eq and abilities are based on merit (i.e. time spent playing) instead of RL money. It is certainly a noble goal, if difficult to achieve.

      --
      call me FOSS im the boss with the sauce and the source
  9. Critical analysis of a browser game? by Doug52392 · · Score: 1

    It's true: Nerds have way too much time on their hands.

    1. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Shadow+of+Eternity · · Score: 1

      They have a lot of free time, true, but it's not time that they're holding...

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it but splash damage is addressed "To whom it may concern."
    2. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Except, most "nerds" wouldn't be caught dead playing this game.

    3. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Mark_in_Brazil · · Score: 4, Funny

      Except, most "nerds" wouldn't be caught dead playing this game.

      I have a friend who is a well-known cryptographer. He is a tenured professor at the best university in his home country (it's also the best-known university in his home country; the two aren't always the same). Some of his work has become part of important international standards. I have used applications built on his work, and depending on how nerdy you are and what kind of work you do, you might have used some too. His work has won awards and has been recognized by his peers at major academic conferences on cryptography. Whether or not you have heard of him, you have almost certainly heard of some of his collaborators in other countries, even if you aren't a cryptography nerd. If that's not enough "nerd cred" for ya, he is also a fluent speaker of five languages, can get by really well in a sixth, can imitate different accents in at least one of his non-native languages, and has some knowledge of two other real languages plus Klingon.

      And because I was sick to death of seeing his FarmVille updates and my sister's Mafia Wars updates, I finally learned how to block updates from those two applications just today.

      --
      "It is nice to know that the computer understands the problem. But I would like to understand it too." --Eugene Wigner
    4. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by EricX2 · · Score: 1

      No kidding, farm town is way better than farmville.

    5. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You finally figured out how to block the updates? You mean you found the highly obscure "hide" button that appears on the update? Hopefully you aren't a tenured professor anywhere.

    6. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by ibmjones · · Score: 1

      Of course not. They would be caught dead playing Warcraft.

    7. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You finally figured out how to block the updates? You mean you found the highly obscure "hide" button that appears on the update? Hopefully you aren't a tenured professor anywhere.

      First, I didn't figure it out. I asked and a friend told me. I hadn't really paid attention to the "hide" that appears, and even when I had seen it some time ago, I wasn't sure if it meant that it would hide that particular post, all posts from that app from that user, all posts from that app, or all posts from that user. At the time, I didn't care, because I wasn't getting so many Mafia Wars and FarmVille updates. Once I did get tired of receiving them, I looked in "settings" for some way to eliminate updates from FarmVille, Mafia Wars, and other apps I don't use.

      Since you don't know how to use the word "hopefully" correctly, I hope you aren't a high school graduate.

    8. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He used "hopefully" in the disjunct adverb form, which is correct.

      Maybe you should go back to high school.

      Though, I hear they aren't very tolerant of arrogant assholes like yourself.

    9. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      name and shame?
            Since your professor friend has no problem with corporations doing large scale data havesting, mining and analysis, he should have no problem with the same thing on a much smaller scale. I see little difference between my friend telling strangers about things I consider private and faceless companies secretely doing the same and making big bucks in the process. In some ways, my friend betraying a confidence is far less objectionable.
      a) I know that he has this information. (With Facebook apps, most people have no clue what data the app itself has access to. Trying to explain how this app plus that app and maybe this other app being used by X million users allows advanced data mining and why this is bad is like trying to explain the intricacies of Hamlet to a Kindergartner. They are willing to at least listen for a few minutes, but the moment you say something they don't understand, they get bored and give up. If you push the issue they get cranky.)
      b) he can only tell a relatively limited number of people
      c) he probably isn't going to be making money doing so.
      d) I can punch him in the nose if he tells the wrong people or shares something that was intended to be totally private.

    10. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Phroggy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He used "hopefully" in the disjunct adverb form, which is correct.

      Maybe you should go back to high school.

      Though, I hear they aren't very tolerant of arrogant assholes like yourself.

      Are you kidding? Last I checked, most high schools show favoritism toward arrogant assholes.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    11. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      It's on Gamasutra. A site about making games. "Let's take this success apart; what can we learn to apply to our own projects?"

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    12. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, most "nerds" wouldn't be caught dead playing this game.

      If you play Farmvilled you are a nerd. Farmville is God's way of telling you that you need to get laid.

    13. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Pshh. Anyone could say that. If your alleged friend even exists, he%$($/&(NO CARRIER

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Mod parent -1 "methinks he doth protest too much."

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Critical analysis of a browser game? by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. On /. +1 Insightful is a synonym for "-1 methinks he doth protest too much".

  10. Social Networking groups by Idiomatick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the fact that a poor game can be so popular is the fact that they are targeting addicted social network users. That is like saying you can sell games and apps for more on an iphone... duhhh. It is all about the user base. I bet you could shoot fish in a barrel too...

    1. Re:Social Networking groups by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except they aren't selling these games on Facebook.
      It's a freemium model. Free to everyone, but you can also pay for premium features.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Social Networking groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your post is self-contradictory and has no logical connection to the original. Are you high or do you play Farmville?

    3. Re:Social Networking groups by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the fact that a poor game can be so popular is the fact that they are targeting addicted social network users.

      That is a valid point.

      That is like saying you can sell games and apps for more on an iphone... duhhh. It is all about the user base.

      I'm not sure I'm following you here. You think you can sell games for more on an iPhone than on what platform? Games are certainly cheaper on average than on a Nintendo DS or PSP (which average $32 a title). I haven't seen overall numbers for other phone platforms, but there are published numbers on the average cost of the top 10 most popular paid apps and the iPhone is at the bottom of the list:

      • iPhone - $1.60
      • Windows Mobile - $20.00
      • BlackBerry - $18.00
      • Nokia Symbian S60 - $24.50

      In short, I don't know where you get the idea that people pay more for apps on the iPhone, but from all the numbers I've seen the exact opposite seems to be the case by a huge margin. The larger user base a developer can target with a single version of the app and the fact that Apple charges very little from developers (profiting from increased Phone sales instead) has made the iPhone a place where people actually make money selling small titles for a dollar and major games for $10.

    4. Re:Social Networking groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the forums and the people griping - people spend a lot of money on that garbage. I think they're idiots, but since I don't play the game, I guess it doesn't matter what I think.

    5. Re:Social Networking groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever actually shot fish in a barrel? Do you have any idea how hard it is? Its easier to toss a grenade and be done with it.

    6. Re:Social Networking groups by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Pretty much all winmo apps are free... none of which are included in your lists...... sooo that doesn't work now does it.

      Find stats on amount of money spent on apps PER phone. iphone vs any other OS and it'll be a pretty damn big gap I assure you.

    7. Re:Social Networking groups by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I pay more than $1.60 for apps. The only apps I think are worth buying are usually over $5. You get what you pay for. I'm not interested in filling my iPhone with tons of crap apps. Averages and top 10 charts don't tell you everything.

    8. Re:Social Networking groups by Jugalator · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that a poor game can be so popular is the fact that they are targeting addicted social network users.

      I think a contributing reason to its size today is because many users stop using Farmville as they grow bored, but don't delete the Farmville application => still an active Farmville user in the eyes of Facebook and Zynga. Many even do this intentionally, since friends who still play Farmville gain additional bonuses if they have friended Farmville users to be "neighbors".

      So I think the number of active Farmville users could be something quite different.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    9. Re:Social Networking groups by Firehed · · Score: 1

      And if you look at the iPhone's top grossing apps*, you'll see an average price of $30.69 with 3 of the 10 at or above $79.99 (all GPS apps, the rest with one exception are games). If you went through the top 25 that drops to $14.55, which is not insignificant.

      For what it's worth, I've bought more titles for my iPhone than any other gaming platform; quite possibly more than all of them combined. Plenty were free and not all were games, but apps that cost only a few bucks are certainly less of a gamble than games ranging from $30-60+. Overall, people do tend to pay less for iPhone apps than most other platforms, but they also pay for more of them. And with a huge audience, that lower price can be made up for in volume. I don't know whether that works out better for publishers overall, but that's at least a slightly different discussion.

      *As of posting, according to the App Store's built-in top grossing list

      --
      How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
    10. Re:Social Networking groups by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Pretty much all winmo apps are free...

      Yeah, but there are still fewer free apps for WinMo than the iPhone. What were were talking about was specifically excluding apps for free because you said apps that were sold. I'm not interested in getting in a dick waving contest with you about whether Windows Mobile or the iPhone is a better platform for some purpose. I don't care and don't own one of either. I'm just wondering where you got the idea that apps cost more on the iPhone, since I've never seen any article that made such a claim and many that said the opposite.

      If you do have a source for your opinion, please present it, otherwise I'm writing your opinion off as just unsupported belief from a fanboy/hater.

      Find stats on amount of money spent on apps PER phone.

      Why? How does that matter when it can be hugely influenced by how many offerings are available on a given platform and by how easy it is to acquire those offerings. You might as well argue that people that shop at Walmart spend more money than people who shop at the Gap, because the average person spends more money at the former in a year. Of course they do, because Walmart has a lot more selection of products.

    11. Re:Social Networking groups by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      I pay more than $1.60 for apps.

      I don't pay anything for apps because I don't own a smartphone. What does that have to do with anything. One person's experience doesn't really matter compared to wide ranging statistical analysis of many users.

    12. Re:Social Networking groups by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

      heh, I just joine the not playing farmville group. Also, MEEP!

      --
      Reboot macht Frei.
    13. Re:Social Networking groups by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      And if you look at the iPhone's top grossing apps*

      Why would anyone look at that particularly? Of course it will be skewed towards more expensive applications by virtue of what it is. I suppose you can compare that to the top grossing apps on other platforms. But I don't see those numbers published anywhere for anything but the iPhone for comparison. I chose the top selling apps because there were numbers for most platforms easily available.

    14. Re:Social Networking groups by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Agreed but it is still a way better metric than top product.

      Hell for linux the top grossing product might be some odd server thing that costs thousands to deploy. Does that mean linux users are rich? Fuck no.

    15. Re:Social Networking groups by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 1

      Agreed but it is still a way better metric than top product.

      Not really. First we have access to numbers for top selling products, but I don't see any easy to find numbers on amount of money spent on apps by users of different phones. Second, top selling apps gives a good idea as to how much is spent for the average app. Amount spent per phone will vary greatly based upon what apps and what number are available. Would you use the same numbers to judge how much the average user is willing to spend on desktop computers? If people spend less money on apps for Macs than for Windows machines, does that reflect the free apps and different selection of apps or the willingness of users of those OS's to pay. Mac users spend less on games by a large margin, and yet shareware game companies report a much lower rate of nonpayment from those same users indicating that contrary to your proposed metric Mac users are more willing to pay for games.

      Hell for linux the top grossing product might be some odd server thing that costs thousands to deploy. Does that mean linux users are rich? Fuck no.

      That is because for the most part Linux is not a comparable product to Windows or OS X. Most Linux installs are for the server and appliance space where consumers don't consider Windows or OS X desktop products as an alternative. If you were to narrow that down to Linux on the desktop pre-installs though (say everex machines), I bet the numbers would be a pretty good indication.

    16. Re:Social Networking groups by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      You've convinced me that both metrics are complete crap and have no way of knowing this. .... I guess that is getting somewhere haha :P

    17. Re:Social Networking groups by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

      I'm trying to say that stats don't tell you everything. Cheap apps are obviously going to be more popular because people feel there is less risk in buying them. But that doesn't mean they never buy more expensive apps, or that there isn't a market for them, or that the expensive apps aren't selling, or say much about customer satisfaction. And I'm not sure the comparison to other platform is that useful considering their different success rates and different retail experiences.

    18. Re:Social Networking groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is this neat invention called a shotgun. Saw off the end of barrel (of the gun, not the one with the fish in it) and shoot fish in the barrel (with the fish) with ease!

  11. Unfriending due to Farmville by RabidMonkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Due to Farmvilles massive spamming, and my inability to make it stop telling me when my sisters/friends/coworkers have found a new cow, I've actually resorted to unfriending people who are farmville addicts. My "newsfeed" went from updates on my friends lives to 3/4 farmville useless announcements, making it effectively useless. I was tempted to install the app to see if I could filter them somehow, but ultimately said forget it.

    It's fine if people want to play games, but frankly, the rest of the world doesn't care or need to know that you planted seeds. If I installed a facebook app that broadcasted every time I got a green drop in WoW I'm sure my friends wouldn't be too happy.

    Add to this the Mafia wars spam, and these stupid little apps have made a mess out of what was once a useful tool for me to keep on top of my friends day to day and related silliness.

    --
    We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    1. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Whatshisface · · Score: 5, Informative

      Due to Farmvilles massive spamming, and my inability to make it stop telling me when my sisters/friends/coworkers have found a new cow, I've actually resorted to unfriending people who are farmville addicts. My "newsfeed" went from updates on my friends lives to 3/4 farmville useless announcements, making it effectively useless. I was tempted to install the app to see if I could filter them somehow, but ultimately said forget it.

      It's fine if people want to play games, but frankly, the rest of the world doesn't care or need to know that you planted seeds. If I installed a facebook app that broadcasted every time I got a green drop in WoW I'm sure my friends wouldn't be too happy.

      Add to this the Mafia wars spam, and these stupid little apps have made a mess out of what was once a useful tool for me to keep on top of my friends day to day and related silliness.

      It takes one click to block an unwanted application like Farmville from posting to your News Feed. There's a "Hide" option on any News Feed story which will block all posts from that application. Very useful.

    2. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just hide all farmville / mafiawars / misc. newsfeed updates.

    3. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by TheSwampDweller · · Score: 1

      You can hide the Farmville updates by clicking the hide button that appears when your mouse hovers over them. This option turned out to be a life saver. :)

    4. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Aladrin · · Score: 1

      As someone else noted, you can block each application.

      But I hear what you're saying about the spam from all the apps. Personally, I use facebook as a gaming platform, so the game ones don't bother me, but the other ones do instead, like the constant barrage of 'join this group' and 'support my cause' and the new quizzes and crap.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I was tempted to install the app to see if I could filter them somehow, but ultimately said forget it

      Are you retarded? Click the HIDE button right next to the notification and you'll never see another note from that app again.

    6. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I was tempted to install the app to see if I could filter them somehow, but ultimately said forget it.

      Facebook does allow you to block apps... and that IIRC includes the announcements that come with them.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by iknowcss · · Score: 4, Funny

      He just needs an excuse to explain why he is friends with so few people

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    8. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by grahamtriggs · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, you can block posts from an application. As I already have, along with the hundreds of other applications that spam my newsfeed every day.

      It's still one of the major reasons why I've largely turned my back on Facebook and turned to Twitter.

    9. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Fencepost · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, I was getting a small number of Farmville-related items even though I'd hidden it. Attempting to set the option to block all access (at the bottom of the message I received) gave me an error every time I tried it.

      The same thing worked for other applications though.

      --
      fencepost
      just a little off
    10. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, those blocks didn't work on the iPhone App. That's why I stopped using the app... it got too full of game updates.

    11. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook Lite: http://lite.facebook.com

      Basic classic style Facebook with no 3rd party apps, or wireless. Less space than a Nomad, but it's pretty unlame.

    12. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by jargoone · · Score: 5, Funny

      (Looking for "Like" link...)

    13. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Maximus633 · · Score: 1

      As I was typing a response to your post I remembered that I needed to harvest my sunflowers.... BRB!

    14. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On Twitter, all the useless spam is manual.

    15. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by sparkydevil · · Score: 1

      Here's the facebook group for you: I Defriended You!

    16. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by RabidMonkey · · Score: 1

      I've blocked them for a few weeks, but I get random notifications still :S

      --
      We emerge from our mother's womb an unformatted diskette; our culture formats us. - Douglas Coupland
    17. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by KZigurs · · Score: 1

      doesn't always work. Same as fails to work if you want to prevent app you are playing around with posting stuff in your feed.

    18. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got ticked with FarmVille and blocked it, along with MafiaWars, but I still see occasional updates. Kind of like a good spam filter - the occasional one getting through doesn't both me too much.

      Also kind of amusing that one or two of my middle-aged Facebook contacts (former teachers) were the biggest source of Farmvile updates, rather than the Facebook junkies my own age.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    19. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by karnal · · Score: 1

      The WinMo app is the same way - doesn't take into account apps you've blocked or people you've hidden. Ends up having me just "web" to m.facebook.com.

      --
      Karnal
    20. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Schlemphfer · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a much more elegant solution to your problem.

      1) In Facebook's left column, select "Create a New List."

      2) Call it "Non Bozos."

      3) Select every non-Farmville playing friend who you actually want to be part of your news feed.

      4) When you're finished, click your "Non Bozos" list, and you'll see a news feed made up of just those people.

      5) Bookmark that page, and make that bookmark the normal way you visit Facebook from now on.

      This will solve your Farmville problem and also make your news feed experience 100 times better, since you'll only be getting updates from people you care about.

      --
      I'm generally "Interesting," "Insightful," and even "Funny" here. What the hell happens to me at parties?
    21. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      If he doesn't care about the bozos, then "unfriending" is exactly what should happen.

    22. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Announcer · · Score: 1

      I have not had to "unfriend" anyone. As "whatshisface" just said, I clicked the "HIDE" button. Once. No more farmville updates. When I got the first actual "invite", I clicked "block this application". No more invites. Did the same with those stupid mafia wars and all the others. Their ads still keep popping up, though, even when I have clicked "dislike" on all of them. They only seem to go away for a short time, then come back.

      --
      Willie...
    23. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Evro · · Score: 1

      Or you could just click "Hide Farmville."

      --
      rooooar
    24. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I agree.

      I have no idea whether Farmville is a good game - maybe it is, maybe it isn't. But if they want to look at why it's so successful, they can't ignore the simple fact of the huge amount of spam that is used to advertise it, which puts it at an unfair advantage. Sure, if I was writing a game, I could make it so that it offers to spam everyone in your address book everyday, but that doesn't mean I'd do it, nor would doing so make me a good game developer.

    25. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      How so? More friends leads to more spamming.

    26. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

      Or you could actually learn how to use Facebook. You know that thing that says "Hide" next spam from any Facebook application? Guess what it does... It's not too hard... It "hides" the application you will never see spam from any friend from that application again. Amazing eh? Of course if you are so dim you can't figure that out and you must unfriend your friends then carry on.

    27. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by rwv · · Score: 1

      the rest of the world doesn't care or need to know that you planted seeds.

      Virtual seeds is the key. Nobody cares about *virtual* statistics on anything. If any of my friends were to plant real seeds for growing some kind of plant or if they found out that a seed they had planted in their wife had taken root then I'd be very interested in seeing an update.

    28. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by lannocc · · Score: 1

      Just goes to show you really don't care about all the stupid shit your friends are up to. Why even have a news feed when your friends suck? No I'm not being mean or targeting you specifically; most people are boring as hell.

    29. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      You're looking for Facebook Purity.

      Requires Greasemonkey.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    30. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      That only shows up on some Facebook UIs, though... for example, AFAIK, the iPhone app doesn't have the block option, and I pretty much only ever view Facebook through the iPhone.

    31. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by hany · · Score: 1

      I've got apps blocked yet I do receive various announcements from them "camouflaged" as messages from my friends, like "George just conquered last free country in The World Domination Silly Game" etc. I have to then individually click "hide" to "kill off" all further announcements from that particular app. But next week, there is some new cools app making rounds ...

      --
      hany
    32. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by aug24 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't work on the iPhone app :(

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    33. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by RKThoadan · · Score: 1

      It's not really at an unfair advantage. Every facebook game does that. Farmville might seem the worst just because so many people play it, but I don't think it actually sends more notifications than any other app. Mafia Wars is at least as bad.

    34. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by residieu · · Score: 1

      My current biggest turnoff from Facebook is the friends that link their Twitter to Facebook, and so post 50 times a day...

    35. Re:Unfriending due to Farmville by estobancrikey · · Score: 1

      the "hide" option, as its name declares only hides the posts from that application, it doesnt stop that application from harvesting your facebook profile data, or from other people inviting you to add that application or notifications from that application. one solution is the facebook purity script available from http://bit.ly/fbpure which adds a "block app" function to each post from any application, which allows you to actually block the application with just a couple of quick clicks. blocking the application means you will no longer see posts from that app, it will not be able to harvest any data from your profile, you will not ever be invited to add that application, you will not receieve notifications from that application. it also automatically hides all application posts, transferring them to a separate section, and also includes a whitelisting capability to allow app posts from apps you want to see.

  12. It drives me nuts by NtroP · · Score: 0, Troll

    I swear, if I see another post about one of my "friends" finding a little lost duckling or sheep or whatever on my facebook feed I'm going to start making heavy use of the "unfriend" feature. If you want to play your game, fine, but PLEASE facebook, give me the ability to turn off notifications from stupid games like that! I might even try playing it if I wasn't so annoyed by all the crap it spews onto my facebook page and worried that I'd annoy my friends and family in turn - that and I don't trust ANY applications interacting with my facebook account.

    No, I don't want that drink, poke, hug, heart, angel, bush or whatever. Thanks all the same, especially not when I have to click a button to give it access to my account. Yes, I'm paranoid.

    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    1. Re:It drives me nuts by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      They've had this for a long time. You can hide notifications from any app permanently from the news feed. If that doesn't work, go to the page for the app and you can choose Block and also remove it permanently. Usually it works just clicking Hide on the newsfeeds. I do that on all quizzes and other apps that show up. I see a new one every few weeks, but otherwise I don't see any at all - all the popular ones are blocked.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    2. Re:It drives me nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Click hide. It won't show up until you hover your mouse over the top right corner of the post.

    3. Re:It drives me nuts by cpscotti · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It ever occurred to you that facebook has complete control of/access to your facebook account?
      (Yeah.. I also feel like killing someone when I see those "John Cusak found a black sheep on his farm")
      If you are really concerned about the data at your account why putting it on facebook at the first place.. the problem with paranoia these days is that some people are still shy about their data... internet is here fellas... privacy is something from last century when REAL farm people could "do it" behind the barn for years without no one knowing it..
      I also have those apps and feel in some way like you but not bc they could get my data, I hate them because they are fucking stupid!
      Seems to me that farmville success is only due to "Idle" people wanting to be in facebook all the time (to check that new photo their ex has shared).. they keep playing just as killing time...

    4. Re:It drives me nuts by cpscotti · · Score: 1

      *hate those apps! (let the typo and lack of reading preview take place)

    5. Re:It drives me nuts by DeadPixels · · Score: 1

      Yes, people, we can Hide applications and it will block that application from posting to your newsfeed. However, there are so many terrible apps out there, I find myself hiding a new one more or less daily. What I (and others, I would assume) would like to see is an option on Facebook to disable all applications from posting to my news feed, instead of having to wait for them to pop up and then block them one by one.

    6. Re:It drives me nuts by hldn · · Score: 1

      theres a greasemonkey script for that..

      http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/44459

      --
      http://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
    7. Re:It drives me nuts by NtroP · · Score: 1

      Heh. Learn something new every day. I guess I should actually log into facebook in a browser some times. I've been interacting with it through 3rd-party apps on the desktop and iPhone so far - they don't give me those options (that I've been able to see).

      --
      "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    8. Re:It drives me nuts by GrumblyStuff · · Score: 1

      Paranoid people don't use Facebook.

    9. Re:It drives me nuts by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      Thats fantastic. Except that when I get on my crackberry I have no such options.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    10. Re:It drives me nuts by Ksevio · · Score: 1

      Yep, it even works in Opera and has made facebook a lot more pleasant.

  13. it does weird things to people by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1, Funny

    I've had a website design customer start playing it on their laptop during a website consultation! I think that game messes with people's heads. Also, and I'm just reporting this as is without comment, a guy at my brother's work who happens to be african american plays it and 100% of his crops are cotton. Now how would that even happen? Lol. It just seems like something a normal, sane person wouldn't do :P

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:it does weird things to people by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      Rule #1 of playing addicting games: once the game starts negatively* affecting things outside of the game, it is time to quit.

      *I would omit a qualifier but some games have positive social interaction.

  14. Harvest Moon! by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If only FarmVille approached even a fraction of the things you can do in the Harvest Moon series.
    I think saying it's a glorified version is being too nice.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Harvest Moon! by MetalPhalanx · · Score: 1

      I agree completely. Harvest Moon > Farmville

    2. Re:Harvest Moon! by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I think "glorified" does not mean you're the best. It means you've got the glory.

    3. Re:Harvest Moon! by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      "FarmVille is Harvest Moon simplified enough that the types of people that are frequent Facebook users actually want to play it"?

    4. Re:Harvest Moon! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      "Made to appear more important or better than it actually is; as, The Chief Financial Officer was little more than a glorified accountant."

      I was saying that a negative term was not negative enough.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Harvest Moon! by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      I think both are a glorified version of.. um.. actually farming.

      But that's just me.

      I personally get paid by the government to NOT play farm ville, so I don't raise any more crops and flood the market.

      woot.

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
  15. Forget Farmville by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Facebook will ruin your life.

    A few months ago I signed up on Facebook, just for the heck of it. Then I noticed that there were a lot of people I went to High School with on there. Pretty soon I was gettng friend request from them. One day I got a friend request from an old girlfriend who I hadn't seen since graduating. My only memory of her was when she was 17 -- cute with big titties. And then I looked at her current picture.

    She has not aged well.

    My fantasies are ruined.

    1. Re:Forget Farmville by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Are you kidding? I had the same situation, and took the time to breathe one hell of a big sigh of relief that I didn't marry her.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Forget Farmville by ModernGeek · · Score: 1

      Same thing happened to my college girlfriend. Her name Danielle by chance?

      --
      Sig: I stole this sig.
    3. Re:Forget Farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hey William you're not so good looking either anymore.

      -- Danielle

    4. Re:Forget Farmville by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      I think we used to spend our summers together in Eagle River!

    5. Re:Forget Farmville by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      She has not aged well.

      My fantasies are ruined.

      Time's a bitch. But then, I've seen that happen before. Hell, a girl I had a severe crush on in high school managed to age about 20 years during her college years. A computer screen between two people can be a blessing because that first "Oh my God what happened to you?" look doesn't transmit.

    6. Re:Forget Farmville by bakdor · · Score: 5, Funny

      I DID marry her - now I play Farmville to block out the pain of my ruined life.

    7. Re:Forget Farmville by Boronx · · Score: 1

      Sounds like she should be relieved, too.

    8. Re:Forget Farmville by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Even worse are the ones who post pictures that are only a few years after high school (so you think they are current and still hot) only to find out that picture was 5 years after high school, but you graduated 20 years ago.

  16. Noob gamers by T+Murphy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A lot of gamers have played Runescape, Diablo 2 or similar and experienced enough "why am I wasting my time", "but it's so addicting" to learn to resist starting a new addicting game. A lot of Farmville players likely haven't experienced this, so they have no built up immunity and will waste their time without a second thought.

    While you could argue any game is a waste of time, Farmville's grind only earns you the opportunity to continue grinding- no end goal, no endgame sandbox. At least when you have a goal in sight you can tell when it isn't getting any closer.

    1. Re:Noob gamers by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      It's only a waste of time if your time is actually worth something. I suspect most people's time is pretty worthless to begin with, else television executives would not generally be wealthy.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:Noob gamers by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      You are putting the subject in the wrong part of the problem. Is surprising (ok, maybe not) how easy is to get "addicted" to something, specially when makes you feel part of a community, no matter how shitty the "experience" is. If you think that it is wrong, in the Gamasutra article they point to mybrute, that makes Farmville look like a piece of art, and still should be wildly successful. And even that implies more "participation" from you than being fan of a football/soccer/basket club.

    3. Re:Noob gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly so, whenever i buy a game i ask myself, "is there a point to playing this?", usually that point has to have a social aspect like playing with friends. if i'm playing to level, there is no need to get the game, doubly so if there are bots for said game.

    4. Re:Noob gamers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay, OT, long time no see. Pali here, I never see you on IRC anymore.

      I just recently started playing farmville/farmtown/mafiawars cause I was bored and unemployed. The mafiawars game actually has goals to meet (it is similiar to the time honored drugwars, though with a leveling system and a godfather you get to meet and other stuff like that), whereas the farming ones are grind grind grind for the honor of grinding more as the parent thread points out. The key to their success is the multiplayer, your happy lil character can visit your friends farm and help them out and you can chat and stuff. It is really all about socialization. Whereas in mafiawars there's zero socialization, beyond giving some gifts. More girls play the farm games, more guys play the mafia game.

      They make their money by charging for tokens to get extra reward coins for buffs. Free games ironically make loads more money than pay-games as a result of this. From my perspective, I'm playing it to get ideas on how to make my own. In the meantime I've been reading lots of tutorials on coding for facebook and flash and so on.

    5. Re:Noob gamers by bigngamer92 · · Score: 1

      This. This should be in a "Scientific" Paper, because it's true. When it comes to gaming addiction, a lot of times once a player has had enough of the stupidity, they stop playing "Social" (read Grind) games. For me it was Runescape, and then Guild Wars. Now I just don't care. If it's not purely about arena, or about enjoying the game while playing it, I'm not interested.

    6. Re:Noob gamers by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      Mafia wars is like a pointless clickfest grind. It's nothing compared to the original dopewars or drugwars. I'm lvl 150 now in mafia wars, nobody attacks me or robs anymore, very boring. There is almost no gender barrier for FarmVille. But there is for the other ones like YoVille and Restaurant City and that junk.

      Yes people will blow like $20-50 on MafiaWars, which is completely silly. They could have paid for a real game instead. I played MW for basically the same reason. Although after a while I realized it is vastly inferior to the old BBS door games I used to play and host, which also had the concept of spending turns/point that you get recharged periodically throughout the day.

      ps - I don't IRC anymore because the channel no longer is a useful place to be, talk to Teckla if you want my IM and email.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    7. Re:Noob gamers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      A lot of gamers have played Runescape, Diablo 2 or similar and experienced enough "why am I wasting my time", "but it's so addicting"

      On the contrary, I think the article's focus is ack-basswards. When I joined Facebook I played a whole bunch of games, I have now blocked all of them but Farmville. Why that one? Because it actually gives you MORE of a "reward" than almost any other game I have ever played (not being a female in posession of Rez:Trance and its peripheral device.) You build your little farm and there's a collaborative aspect. Is it a deep game? Shit no, it makes Harvest Moon look like the whole Myst series. Actually, that comparison is beyond apt; playing Harvest Moon is even more of a chore for less of a reward than Farmville.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Noob gamers by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      D2 is a time-waster if you play it over and over. It's decent multiplayer if you casually play through the storyline with a friend.

      Every game has a point where it's more mork than play. MMOs generally tend to reach that point fairly early; D2 is another example of a game that can be turned into a job easily.


      I, for my part, am glad to recently have infected two of my friends with UFO: Enemy Unknown addiction (with a third infection pending). There's only so much grinding you can do before all your soldiers have 80+ in all stats and you have more money than God from mass-producing Laser Cannons. Plus, the game doesn't try to upsell you on anything.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    9. Re:Noob gamers by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      i found this to be true of Mafia Wars and the Vampire equivalent (on iPhone). Once you hit a certain income level the game falls apart. They become a reason to unlock the phone once an hour. i deleted both and sighed in relief.

      Diablo 2 was satisfying. i could play it again in different classes, or the same class but with a different set of powers. i could play using more cheats so it was less of a grind. i could play with people.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  17. whatever - facebook sucks by OrangeTide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't even go on my facebook page if it wasn't for the games. The people that use facebook are BORING.

    I really don't care what any of my friends had for dinner, the new dress they bought or what their little kids did that morning. Yes, clicking random bullshit in Mafia wars is more interesting to me than those things.

    I attempted to steer updates into the things that interest me (programming and technology) but gave up after one of my "friends" just posted a "what?" comment on it.

    I then realized that the social aspect of Facebook is completely uninteresting to me. I'll just stick with slashdot, forums, newsgroups, IM and IRC for doing my nerd chat.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:whatever - facebook sucks by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps some of us just have more interesting friends. I mean yeah, if your friends are boring, Facebook will be boring.

    2. Re:whatever - facebook sucks by PaganRitual · · Score: 1

      Before I got bored of it, I used to just quote 80s song lyrics

      Simon is ... hearing the secrets that you keep, when you're talking in your sleep.

      My hope was that either people get the song references, which is cool, or get really disturbed by it, which is just as cool.

  18. At least we can all learn a lesson from it... by hort_wort · · Score: 1

    ... such as how to use the "hide" button that pops up when you put your mouse over it in the feed.

  19. Do you people not even TRY to look? by IANAAC · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Really, it's like you all are a bunch of unthinking zombies. It's incredibly easy to hide what you don't want to see with simple click.

    Do you just load the page and wait to see what happens?

    There's a lot you can filter if you take two seconds to look.

  20. Your post indicates lack of Facebook app technique by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    I don't know at what "time" (months ago, etc.) you started unfriending addicts, but there is a simpler way to block all Farmville posts.

    If you see one Farmville post in your feed, click it on the top right and you get two choices:

    1 - hide all posts from Farmville

    2 - hide all posts from this user.

    All you have to do is select item #1. I've used it for any/all apps appearing in my feed.

  21. It already has access to your account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    You don't have to use these apps for them to have access to your account: If your friends use the apps the apps can access everything your friends can access.

  22. Farmville vs Twitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn.
    Just about as exciting as watching paint dry or Baseball(for people outside the US)

    And Twitter is 'so Yesterday'

  23. I'll tell you why... by koan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Everyone where I works plays it, except me, it's total cheese but they love it...why?
    Because to them it's better than working.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  24. My take on facebook by jonaskoelker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really don't care what any of my friends had for dinner, the new dress they bought or what their little kids did that morning.

    When you visit your friends, you do say "hey, nice new dress!", or "how're the kids doing?", or "so how's that diet you're on working out for you?", right?

    Oh well, if they're geeks too, I suppose "So did you hear about this new smartphone that runs Linux?" is more appropriate, but it sounds like you're dissing small talk rather than dissing facebook as a medium for small talk.

    The latter I agree with, the former I don't---even though I'm not a particularly well-renowned practitioner of said art ;-)

    1. Re:My take on facebook by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      it sounds like you're dissing small talk rather than dissing facebook as a medium for small talk.

      Ah, thats not a real diss, try these:

      My old quote: "facebook is a workflow automation system for relationships between stereotypical middle school girls"

      My new quote: "facebook is a computer optimized maximal shallowness solution to impress people you don't care about".

      Now, which one is more accurate, and/or offensive?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:My take on facebook by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      When you visit your friends, you do say "hey, nice new dress!", or "how're the kids doing?", or "so how's that diet you're on working out for you?", right?

      There is a difference between seeing it and commenting on it, and having them post it so everyone can see. And no, I usually don't make that kind of small talk, which might explain why I fail to see the use of facebook's model.

      I tried to do nerd small talk, but it didn't work, so I'm just brushing the entire service aside.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    3. Re:My take on facebook by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I can't actually tell the difference between middle school girl behavior and the behavior of many adult women online. Maybe it's my failing, being a nerd and a man. I have a handful of female friends who are different in this regard to me, so I'm not entirely certain it's my fault.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  25. Personal Information in Facebook Games by BDZ · · Score: 1

    Something I have noticed which is odd is that the games use "their" when a new posting has come up.

    Like this,

    "...got a big ol' reward for being such a great farmer and wants to share their success with you"

    If these games have access to users' personal information you'd think they'd know enough about each user to use "his" or "her" in place of "their."

    1. Re:Personal Information in Facebook Games by vlm · · Score: 1

      If these games have access to users' personal information you'd think they'd know enough about each user to use "his" or "her" in place of "their."

      That pesky transgendered problem rears its head again...

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Personal Information in Facebook Games by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Yes, I was just noticing this recently too. Weird.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  26. FarmTown by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And, then there's FarmTown, almost the exact same game. That's the annoying bit about Facebook apps, everyone one has at least two or three near duplicates

  27. It's not about whether it's big enough... by N0Man74 · · Score: 0

    The number of players cited above is far and away much "bigger" than World of WarCraft has ever had, and it was certainly big enough for gold farmers. It's not about the fact it's not big enough.

    The fact is, it's simply not necessary since Zynga already sells in game items, money, and upgrades for real money. Through their own business model, they've weeded out the "Chinese farmers".

  28. Better model than PS3/Xbox/Wii by HockeyPuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've got a friend that purchased on his own a Wii (so his kids/wife can play games) and a PS3 for his hardcore (FPS and fighting) games. He received a xbox360 as a gift from a cousin. Probably has about a $1000 worth of platforms and associated games.

    Yet if his wife doesn't tell him "Go to bed, it's late" he can play Mafiawars/Farmville until the sun comes up. Amazing how addictive these games are without having to have massive graphics, sound, rumble controllers, online multiplayer. Just a flash interface and a bunch of clicking.

    I'm waiting for Southpark to do an episode on Farmville as a remake of the WoW episode.

    1. Re:Better model than PS3/Xbox/Wii by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HOW can you play Farmville for that long? You harvest/plow/plant your crops, and get stuff from animals or trees. That takes maybe 15-20 minutes. Even if you're trying to kill time, and go visit and help all your neighbors to get cash/XP, that's maybe another half hour? Then what's left... sitting there and watching your crops grow and your animals wander around for the next day (or two or three) until you're ready to repeat the process? It's like being addicted to waking up at 6 AM, it's self-limiting.

      Now, if you want to talk about addictive internet things, how about StumbleUpon? That can take up hours and hours if you don't watch it, and you aren't even playing anything half the time.

    2. Re:Better model than PS3/Xbox/Wii by jozlod · · Score: 2, Informative

      I remembered seeing this awhile ago http://xkcd.com/484/

      --
      this is not my signature
  29. FarmTown by NiteMair · · Score: 4, Funny

    And, then there is FarmTown, almost the exact same game. That's the annoying bit about Facebook apps, everyone one has at least two or three near duplicates.

  30. But how do I block ALL applications? by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    I think I've finally managed to block all of the CURRENT hit games that my friends are addicted to on FB, but it is annoying to have to block each application individually.

    Is there a way to simply block ALL present and future application notices?

    All I want to see are what people type in their profile and their pictures. I am not interested in watching people play games, or hearing about the results.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:But how do I block ALL applications? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://lite.facebook.com

      Anon Coward delivers.

    2. Re:But how do I block ALL applications? by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to simply block ALL present and future application notices?

      Don't use Facebook. Works for me =)

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    3. Re:But how do I block ALL applications? by kegel+dragon · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Try lite.facebook.com

    4. Re:But how do I block ALL applications? by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Indeed - this isn't that better than "But you can opt out of this email spam if you click on the link"...

  31. Modification by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Okay, sibling posts aren't happy with the sexism in parent post. Understandable.
    However, modifying the post to the following, it makes an interesting statement:

    "It's the first MMORPG-like game not considered geek: this is evidenced by the fact that it's played by a larger percentage/amount of women than play WoW and the like."

    A similar factor was behind _The Sims_ being such a huge hit.

    I have no issue with females being involved in primarily-male activities.
    However, I feel that the disparity should still be acknowledged, rather than papered over out of a desire for political correctness.

    Same thing applies in reverse, males being involved in predominately female activities; I'm not like "OMG gay!" or anything.

    In an unrelated note, shuffle presented me with a Janis Joplin song as I was typing this post. (Also, the headline act at the concert I went to included a female MC/DJ). :P

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  32. Yeah, this applies to me by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    In my case, it's been a whole bunch of round-structured browser games. A few of them got kicked to the curb months ago, and I will stop after finishing the current round of the last one.
    This experience has kept me far away from WoW and the Facebook games.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  33. Good point, but... by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I might make that Rule 2, with the following as Rule 1:

    "If the game isn't fun anymore (i.e. because the grind has driven you nuts), then quit".

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:Good point, but... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I've "played" one of PlayMesh's titles for a while. PlayMesh offers the same kind of game for iPhones except they don't get on your case about paying them so much. However, they have about ten reskinned versions of the same game running at the same time, all of them cross-promoting each other.

      I dropped the game after seeing this article and realizing that the game was good at wasting time but not particularly good at keeping me entertained. It was just the same task over and over with varying strings displayed to describe it.

      I finally sold all my equipment, bought as many installations (= money generators) as possible and renamed my account to "FarmMeIAmRich". I think they mark the account as inactive until the next login after I've been farmed to death once but hey, playing piggy bank is still more fun than playing the game.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    2. Re:Good point, but... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Just pray you never get to Rule 34...

  34. Mark Newheiser is right: hello digital pet by stavrica · · Score: 1

    Mark makes some excellent points. We are rapidly evolving the BattleCell game (BattleCell.com) to fit the gaping-wide hole that has become today's Social Gaming world: If it's a Social Game, how come I can't interact with my friends and other players? Zynga has brilliantly demonstrated that you can build a successful business model by effectively marrying good viral marketing (aka, News Feed) with the addictive behaviors identified in your article. Today's Social Gaming offering is comprised of hyped up Tamagotchi digital pet reproductions that allow players to look over their friends' shoulders. One can't really argue with success, of course. But, Mark's final statement nails it --players are left wishing that the game was more fun, that it had more depth after all their investment, that it offered something more meaningful than just another way to spend one's time.

    1. Re:Mark Newheiser is right: hello digital pet by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      effectively marrying good viral marketing (aka, News Feed)

      aka, Spam.

      Spam is not good, and we shouldn't be congratulating developers for resorting to such methods.

  35. You can hide ONE but you can't hide them all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blocking only blocks a single app. While that works for farmville it does nothing for the constant stream of other games, gifts, quizzes, and other information-free crap. I feel like sisyphus, condemned for all eternity to hit this block button over and over again, to little effect, just to read the few real updates. If I don't log into facebook twice a day my chances of catching most of the real stuff rapidly approach zero because even though I only have two-dozen contacts or so the real stuff is flooded off daily by a wave of new crud.

    I don't want to waste my life blocking game after game. I just want real comments written by real people to show up on another tab. Is that so hard?

    Somehow I doubt this is at all accidental on the part of facebook.

  36. Carbon Footprint by SavvyPlayer · · Score: 1

    Ok this may not be quite newsworthy but, it's Sunday right? Anyway, the energy consumed by 26 million CPUs running at or near 100% utilization for 15 or so minutes each day translates to a considerable corporate carbon footprint. It *must* be possible to halve these requirements without impact to actual gameplay.

    1. Re:Carbon Footprint by PhilipPeake · · Score: 1

      Carbon footprint?

      That's so 2007-ish.

      Al Gore will have to invent something else now.
      Whatever next?

      Internet - check.
      Global warming - check.
      Profit - almost worked!

  37. "Deceptively" by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    "Deceptively" is the worst word in the English language. No one has a clue as to what it means.

    See the usage note here.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  38. Posted as Link on Facebook. by CoolSilver · · Score: 1

    This is being posted as a notice to the farmville-addicted family and friends.

    You Should Too!

  39. Not totally. by weston · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You can disable that.

    You can only fully disable it if you completely opt out of using any Facebook applications. While it's true that most Facebook apps are crap, it'd be nice to be able to play Lexulous with friends without having any black-hat or social marketer who's written a quiz have access to my name and list of friends (along with whatever other info I'm not careful enough about).

    The option they need is: "only reveal even my mere existence to apps I've explicitly opted into."

    1. Re:Not totally. by 3p1ph4ny · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can block applications on a per-application basis too. I've blocked everything people have invited me to, except for the two applications I actually use. Not as good as opt-in, but it does exist.

    2. Re:Not totally. by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Use an anonymous account? Never enter anything beyond username and disposable email address. If they require further information, lie. Yes, that defeats the purpose of a social networking site but you're arguably using it as a gaming portal, therefore it's appropriate to skip the social part.

      If you do feel the need to void your privacy, use separate accounts for gaming and socializing. Even if your friends add your gaming account to their contact list all that tells Facebook is "this is a person users X, Y and Z know".

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  40. LOL by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    someone still believe in this global warming scam?

  41. Re:Lazy techs don't have time and use a farmville by nloop · · Score: 1

    That bot is based on actually clicking. It requires a fullscreen zoomed out application of farmville running for it to work. Farmvillebot.net has a free application that doesn't need a screen of farmville. It will happily run in the taskbar, and it's free.

  42. Re:Lazy techs don't have time and use a farmville by PhilipPeake · · Score: 1

    SPAM

    Google "Level Up Really Fast using the plow/plant/destroy trick" 1010 hits for that exact phrase.
    Go find somewhere else to market your stuff!

  43. Re:Lazy techs don't have time and use a farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning - above is referal spam!

    Real techs write their own bots anyway.

  44. Grand Theft Auto to Farmville by lostinmadnez · · Score: 1

    Sad state of affair, can u believe that some of my friends went from GTA to farmville. WTF? Love the farmbot advertisement further up! Go get em, "tiger". Heard that some people are afraid to go to work because someone could steal the freakin virtual crop!

  45. Country Life is better by G3ORG3 · · Score: 0

    Country Life is way cooler and graphics are better. I've played both and I personally recommend CL over FV.

  46. Re:Lazy techs don't have time and use a farmville by the_humeister · · Score: 1

    Screw that. Any geek worth his salt will write his own scripts. Hell, I used to write my own GuildWars scripts when I was playing hardcore.

  47. Re:Lazy techs don't have time and use a farmville by johncandale · · Score: 1

    I learned a long long time ago if you need a bot to play your game, you shouldn't be playing the game, it's become a second job.

  48. Some people find it meditative by johncandale · · Score: 1

    Some people find it meditative, it can just be a way to relax and not think for a 20 minute break. As this any worse then watching that tivo'd simpsons repeat episode again? I also know a lot of people get accounts because their friends want them to because you need certain number of friends to get certain items, but the friends while havng a farm, never actually use it

  49. Not mine. by TPJ-Basin · · Score: 1

    Yours maybe.

    --
    TPJ - Founder, The Amazon Basin
  50. Oblogatory XKCD by KingAlanI · · Score: 1
    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  51. addictive my ass by SoVi3t · · Score: 1

    Until koreans start dropping dead in internet cafe's from marathon farmville sessions, I refuse to acknowledge it's addictiveness

    --
    Defender of Microsoft and Communism!!!
  52. People are aliens. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously. Farmville?

    I'll do you one better.

    I'm annoyed that I need a Facebook account just to receive what we used to call, "Email".

    The advantage I see is that open messages can turn into impromptu, albeit simple discussion forums with built-in photo catalogs. This can be more useful than email for some jobs.

    But that's not what it's all about, as Farmville indicates. I think Facebook touches some kind of primal-tribal-pack-animal nerve. Farmville itself might represent more than just a dumb game with an addictive tamagachi edge. It might be a subconscious response to the fact that our food supply is precarious and stupid and that survival might fairly soon depend upon being able to raise chickens and grow potatoes in your back yard.

    -FL

    1. Re:People are aliens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks - now I finally "get" Google Wave.

  53. Relax by kehren77 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't understand why people get all pissy when you mention Farmville. If you don't want to play, then don't. But you don't have to hate people that do and call them noobs or sheep.

    The reason people play is the same reason people buy the Wii. It's accessible. Anyone can fucking play. Anyone. I know that for the hardcore player out there that just seems wrong, but you know what? The gaming world doesn't revolve around you.

    If you don't what to see that shit in your news feed, choose to hide announcements from that app. Simple. Other people have other opinions. Learn to accept it.

    In the interest of full disclosure, I'm level 41 in Farmville and have never paid a dime for content.

    1. Re:Relax by stewbacca · · Score: 1

      Probably the same reason I get pissy when I see Lady GaGa or some other garbage at the #1 spot on the charts. My standards aren't super-high, but certainly society can do better than Lady GaGa and Farmville.

  54. Farmville and Elderly by Tybalt_Capulet · · Score: 1

    My grandfather has logged like, 20 hours in Farmville this week.

    (That's a lot for normal people to you WoW players.)

    --
    Has the old saint in his forest not yet heard of it? That God is dead?
  55. Re:One other thing the article doesn't cover... by lamapper · · Score: 1

    There are obviously gaming platforms out there that do not get out of sync as often, do not hang up as often or just simply crap out because you have gotten too far ahead of your person when you are plowing planting and harvesting.... Based on this fact alone, Yea Zynga has problems.

    I like to blame flash, feels like the problem and strongly believe that if a competitor came out with a Second Life world (virtual 3-D) for Farming, call it FarmValley or FarmCounty, whatever, and used NO FLASH, nothing proprietary that limits them to only one operating system and scaled items correctly, for instance a cat should be smaller than a dog, a dog smaller than a cow, a cow smaller than a person and a person smaller than a building for starters. Say C, PHP, maybe C++, little or no Java, no .NET, and only languages higher than those three to add additional features, not to prevent those three (C, PHP and C++) from being used. Such a virtual social platform would as quickly supplant FarmVille as FarmVille did Farmtown. Heck Zynga is on the record as stating a better GUI and user experience is what made them better. You think they would cut the out of syncs, crashing and hanging caused largely by Flash. You would think....

    Last time I read about the development tools for Second Life, they did not depend on Flash and they were doing some incredible things with rendering images and moving through those rendered images... I freely admit that I have not developed for Zynga or Second Life and if I had, I would better understand the true limitations. I know others will fill me in and I will be interested in reading what you right...thanks in advance.

    --
    Is your Internet Throttled? Install DD-Wrt, OpenWRT or Tomato to learn the truth! Google: 1Gbps/1Gbps: 5 Communities
  56. farmville by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i left farmville on FB because http://speed.neuroninteractive.com/?pref=28 was more addicting

  57. 69 million play by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but none actually *like* it

  58. Rule 34, eh? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't be surprised if there are X-rated MMO's out there.
    I want to avoid starting myself on new MMOs, X-rated or otherwise, though.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  59. I'm a Farmville Addict by stewbacca · · Score: 1

    I admit it. I am addicted to Farmville. I can't stop myself from pressing the "Ignore Farmville" button.

  60. FarmVille Guru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you’re sick and tired of running around totally broke while other players get barns and greenhouses and the most expensive villa, this information is for you.

    You’ve probably always wondered why you can’t seem to make as much money or level up as fast as the other players in the game.

    Learn more : http://www.farmville-secrets.tk

    I used to wonder the same thing. I thought,

    “Where are these people making money so fast?”
    “Are they buying it on FarmVille?”
    “What are they growing and selling?”

    So I set out to spy on all the successful players I could find to see just what they did to earn all of their money and to level up so fast.

    Learn more : http://www.farmville-secrets.tk

  61. Farmer Guru by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a little post to share an amazing tool : Farmer Extreme Manager.
    Perfect to dominate FarmVille for free
    http://tinyurl.com/farmer-extreme-manager ;-)