Slashdot Mirror


Google Investigating Chinese Employees

BluePeppers writes "The Guardian is reporting that Google China is investigating its staff about The Incident. '"We're not commenting on rumor and speculation. This is an ongoing investigation and we simply cannot comment on the details," a Google spokeswoman said. Security analysts told Reuters the malicious software or malware used in the attack was a modification of a trojan called Hydraq. A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer. The analysts said the sophistication in the attack was in knowing whom to attack, not the malware itself.'"

133 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Google is more powerful than I thought.. by brokenin2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I didn't know they could go back in time and undo the incident. Very impressive!

    1. Re:Google is more powerful than I thought.. by raburton · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was concerned for a moment there about declining standards at the Guardian, but you'll be pleased to know the phrase "in lieu" does not appear anywhere in their article.

    2. Re:Google is more powerful than I thought.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately only organic matter could be sent or machines covered with organic matter.

    3. Re:Google is more powerful than I thought.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, let's hope they never figure out how to send back a plasma rifle covered in steak.

    4. Re:Google is more powerful than I thought.. by Destoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Portable weapons of mass destruction wrapped in bacon.. hmmmmmhmhmhmmmgrrglglgl..

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    5. Re:Google is more powerful than I thought.. by Kz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what about a bacon plasma torch?

      --
      -Kz-
  2. Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why should Google be surprised. The funny thing is that all Google will be able to do is fire that person. And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu (or may already be working for them).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Spies everywhere by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I rather strongly suspect that there are a lot of new Google "employees" and "corporate security" who just happen to draw a paycheck from the FBI. It's about mapping out the threat.

    2. Re:Spies everywhere by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I suspect alot of Google China employees draw a paycheck from the People's Liberation Army and other Chinese Government agencies.

    3. Re:Spies everywhere by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But the real question is how many Chinese Government officials are drawing a Google paycheck. I suspect that Google now has more spies than the Vatican.

    4. Re:Spies everywhere by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IANAL but I think that if Google cannot do much, the USA can do : If it is proven they broke into computer systems in order to aid a foreign country against the interests of the United States, it can be considered as the crime of treason. (I am assuming they are American citizens). If they are citizens of China, they can still be judged on the ground of breaking into a computerized system and on the ground of conspiracy.

      USA has no extradition treaties with China so I think they have no obligations to let China judge them.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:Spies everywhere by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Unless this person were working for Baidu to start with, I bet Baidu wouldn't touch then with a 20ft pole. Who on earth would hire someone who had just planted a trojan in their last place of work?

    6. Re:Spies everywhere by m.ducharme · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it is proven they broke into computer systems in order to aid a foreign country against the interests of the United States, it can be considered as the crime of treason. (I am assuming they are American citizens).

      It's very unlikely that the culprit is American.

      If they are citizens of China, they can still be judged on the ground of breaking into a computerized system and on the ground of conspiracy.

      Why exactly would they be tried for obeying orders from their government? They might be punished for getting caught, but we won't likely hear about that.

      USA has no extradition treaties with China so I think they have no obligations to let China judge them.

      Except that the investigation is in Google China, which is in...wait for it...China.

      Anything the US gov can do will be diplomatic in nature, and given how closely tied the economies of the US and China are, any diplomatic action the US can take will be largely symbolic. Though there may be plans for a more covert retaliation in the works as we speak, those plans won't likely involve wasting time trying to extradite the hackers/mole/whoever.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    7. Re:Spies everywhere by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Except that the investigation is in Google China, which is in...wait for it...China.

      Ooops, missed that part. Mod me offtopic then... I thought it was about Chinese developers in USA. Indeed, if that is the case nothing can really be done and Google had really no other choices than closing its offices there.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    8. Re:Spies everywhere by whisper_jeff · · Score: 1

      I believe that industrial espionage is a crime. And I'm sure several other laws were broken along the way (computer hacking itself is a pretty serious crime). I don't know about the laws in China, but I suspect Google can do something beyond just firing the person.

    9. Re:Spies everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      And I suspect alot of Google China employees draw a paycheck from the People's Liberation Army and other Chinese Government agencies.

      Duh - like all. China is a communist country.

      In China, you are either a member of the Party or a nobody.

      Also, there are no corporate entities that are not owned by the state. (At least a majority share.) That goes for foreign corporations, too.

      Think China has become open and capitalist? Go read what the Party has been saying for the last 30 years.

    10. Re:Spies everywhere by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm drawing a good pay check from the Judean People's Front for spying on Google.

    11. Re:Spies everywhere by chiguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google should also check where all their laptops were manufactured. And make sure each BIOS is clean.

      --
      passetspike!
    12. Re:Spies everywhere by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      Well, with top Baidu officials resigning there should be some openings... but it's got to make you wonder why the rats are jumping off the ship.

    13. Re:Spies everywhere by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have mod points, but I don't see the "-5 ethnocentric" choice. That's the whole problem with so many posts in so many articles. People fail to realize that the stories are often global in nature. Think outside the box. Think inside the globe. The world doesn't end at America's coastlines.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:Spies everywhere by eulernet · · Score: 1

      And then they will get to take a job with a Baidu.

      I doubt so.
      When you betray some company, you'll always be marked as a traitor.

    15. Re:Spies everywhere by Fluffeh · · Score: 2, Funny

      The world doesn't end at America's coastlines.

      Of course not. That's where US waters are, before they cover up the rest of God's round earth till they hit the other US coastline. Gosh, you clearly didn't do geography at school did you?

      *rolls eyes*

      --
      Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    16. Re:Spies everywhere by nortcele · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah? Our company outsourced a bunch of IT functions to India. I triple dog dare the Chinese to infiltrate those Indian machines and trash them.

    17. Re:Spies everywhere by Weezul · · Score: 1

      All the cynics will say that Google will fire them, China will execute them along with some hackers, and Google will return to censoring Chinese traffic.

      China may execute their own "internet soldiers" who participated in the attacks just to save face internally, or even just personally, but I'd imagine that Google won't take China punishing the hackers as reason to stop censoring.

      I'd say the most likely long term solution is that Google remains uncensored but China aggressively firewalls any undesirable search results, which both hurts the Chinese government and hurt Google's market share, so Google minimizes the number of blocked search results, while always returning some.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    18. Re:Spies everywhere by Bu11etmagnet · · Score: 1
      --
      Life is complex, with real and imaginary parts.
    19. Re:Spies everywhere by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Funny

      Think outside the box. Think inside the globe.

      It's exactly this kind of Terran-centric Isolationism that has retarded the development of diplomatic relations with our closest neighbor. Reacting with fear to their obviously friendly overtures, doesn't help either.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    20. Re:Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt it. Have you ever worked with say FBI or DHS on a tech level? They are both loaded with total idiots. The CIA is a mixed bad and NSA is loaded with some of the brightest ppl that I have worked inside of the gov. Google has nobody on their roster that is a known American gov. employee. And I doubt that the gov. allows that.

      OTH, I have dealt several times with spies from China. One guy that wanted to invest in the start-up that we were in, but wanted full access to the equipment that we had. Needless to say, it was under strict ITAR. And one gal wanted on to the company once she found out who our roster list was (which also disqualified her).

      BTW, Some of the Google employees are likely rented to various gov agents to help them. Google has a lot more tech than is widely acknowledge. A big part of the spying that went on, was most likely not just about finding a few Chinese. It was far more likely trying to access the Google Search tech, so that Baidau could do a better job.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    21. Re:Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Baidu works VERY close with the Chinese gov. In the same way that Pravda works with Russian Party, Fox with the republican party, or Air America Airlines with the CIA. As it is, Chinese gov. has strict penality for spying or causing harm against other Chinese (esp. gov or companies), but reward handsomely those that do the same against foreigners and then share the information. Basically, the gov has an X-Prize approach to spying on the west.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    22. Re:Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Quit trying to apply western law to China. It does not work. For example, their constitution reads VERY similar to any western constition, except the final area, in which it says that any rights not spelled out for the citizen is reserved by the state (IOW, it is the opposite of most western nations). That one change allows their gov. to do anything and they do.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    23. Re:Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      If a western person worked for North Korea or Iran and then betrayed that confidence by spying on those countries and their business, would that western person be seen as a spy? Nope. Now, if a western person spies on another western country, I would not want them.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    24. Re:Spies everywhere by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      The only links I have to government IT are two old friends, one of whom works for a defense contractor (a very, very bright guy) and the other of whom... probably works for the NSA. I'm not an IT guy myself.

      You do touch on an interesting problem: how can the FBI recruit the tech people it needs? The NSA can give you access to knowledge that you'll never get elsewhere; the military can let you do things with it without going to jail. Being a cop offers neither of those benefits, and most geeks I know are anti-cop. (For the law enforcement folks in the audience: we see you driving 5-10 mph over the speed limit and blowing yellow-red lights in your official cars, the same shit you use to pull us over. You're a bunch of meter maids until you quit that.)

    25. Re:Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Show me a case where a Chinese citizen was punished in anyway for Spying only on Western countries, and I will show you a lie.

      Chinese Gov. has said all along that if crackers spy on the west, it is ok, IFF they share the info (which I suspect that ALL do). Basically, Chinese citizens are executed for spying or cracking each other's systems, but paid for the information from western companies.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    26. Re:Spies everywhere by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The FBI pay their CS ppl at the same level that NSA, CIA, DOD, and NASA pay.

      The prestige with NSA is that you DO work with bright ppl and yes, systems that will not be known about for decades. Finally, NSA pushes you to excel. FBI simply pushes you. And DHS is LOADED with absolute IDIOTS. More cronyism in there, and everybody that I knew in there were total idiots in the private world. DHS is one of those nightmares that should be destroyed.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    27. Re:Spies everywhere by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No, the real question is, how many Google China employees draw a paycheck from an FBI agent who draws a paycheck from a Chinese Government official working for Google USA. ;)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    28. Re:Spies everywhere by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Open, no. Capitalist? Yes, absolutely. "Capitalism" is not a synonym of "democracy", and can be applied by any oppressive state.

    29. Re:Spies everywhere by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Meh, I'm writing from France...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    30. Re:Spies everywhere by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I'm sure China has a very vibrant culture corporate espionage aimed at Western countries. But that does not mean that someemployee of Google who has engaged in such a practice is going to be welcomed with open arms by another company, whether that company is Chinese or not. It's basic common sense. If they did it once, who is to say they won't do it again.

    31. Re:Spies everywhere by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      I need weed to comprehend that.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  3. In lieu of? by bluestar · · Score: 1

    I do not think that word means what you think it means.

    --
    "The cost of freedom is eternal vigilance." -Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:In lieu of? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      His grammar is down the lieu.

    2. Re:In lieu of? by garg0yle · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think they meant "in light of" (as in, in response to). "In lieu of", as you know, means essentially "instead of", and would not make sense in this context. So, you are correct. I just hope you don't get modded down as "grammar police".

      --
      Modding "-1, Troll" is not a proper response if you disagree with me. Try reason.
    3. Re:In lieu of? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Unless he meant it in the proper meaning, in which case, Google has some very peculiar business practices.

    4. Re:In lieu of? by JustNilt · · Score: 1

      Damn, beat me to it. It took me a second to realize it wasn't my lack of comprehension due to a lack of coffee but was instead the complete lack of proofreading.

      --
      You know the thing about UDP jokes? I don't care if you get it or not.
    5. Re:In lieu of? by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is Slashdot. Every summary must have at least one grammatical error.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:In lieu of? by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      No, when an organization is investigating it is staff, there perfectly reasonable to do it in lieu of.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    7. Re:In lieu of? by Rary · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is Slashdot. Every summary must have at least one grammatical error.

      And "investigating it's staff" wasn't good enough?

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    8. Re:In lieu of? by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the ability to travel in time.

    9. Re:In lieu of? by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      This is Slashdot. Every summary must have at least one grammatical error.

      And "investigating it's staff" wasn't good enough?

      emphasis added

    10. Re:In lieu of? by stumblingblock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you know how well informed those English majors are about engineering topics, right? How could it be any other way with an engineer's usage of the language?

    11. Re:In lieu of? by wall0159 · · Score: 3, Funny

      C'mon, go easy - I wouldn't call failing to capitalize IT a grammatical error!

    12. Re:In lieu of? by Rary · · Score: 1

      Well played. :)

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    13. Re:In lieu of? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Since when is a porn reference a grammatical error?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  4. And to present the results... by gpeters · · Score: 3, Insightful

    After the investigation, of course they will invite every Google China employee to join them in the USA for a presentation of the results...!

    Actually, that's the whole investigation. People who have "family obligations" or who are "afraid of airplanes" are the ones to look at!

  5. it's aftermath! by bigmaddog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Irregardless of the actual story content, I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language.

    --

    Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

    1. Re:it's aftermath! by IANAAC · · Score: 1

      That took a minute to realize you were joking.

    2. Re:it's aftermath! by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I find the poster's use of "in lieu" to be the penultimate atrocity
      > vis-a-vis the English language.

      The ultimate one being use of "irregardless"?

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:it's aftermath! by bantab · · Score: 1

      This is actually an alternate reality fiction board. I think it's pretty imaginative stuff.

    4. Re:it's aftermath! by Aladrin · · Score: 2

      Actually, he's not. What that statement says is that instead of having The Incident happen, Google is launching an investigation.

      http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/in+lieu+of

      Obviously, that's not what is going on because we don't have time travel.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    5. Re:it's aftermath! by snarkh · · Score: 1

      No, that's antepenultimate.

    6. Re:it's aftermath! by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      I believe you used vis-a-vis correctly there. Try vice versa.

    7. Re:it's aftermath! by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      See how much correct, clear use of language matters, and how much incorrect and/or unclear use of language impedes constructive debate?

    8. Re:it's aftermath! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      It takes a while for the hive mind to digest the summary. Then its finely honed insight will amaze and scare you.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    9. Re:it's aftermath! by bigmaddog · · Score: 1

      Dammit, you might be right, although I never did like the "in relation to" usage of vis-a-vis. Anyway, the text of the story has now been improved, which saddens me and makes this exercise in internet-enabled douchebaggery moot.

      --

      Even as you read this, your pants are strangling your loins! Aaa!

    10. Re:it's aftermath! by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

      Atrociously irregardless, maybe?

    11. Re:it's aftermath! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      I assumed the joke was someone starting a post criticizing word usage with 'irregardless'.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    12. Re:it's aftermath! by NitroWolf · · Score: 1

      No, that's antepenultimate.

      So then what would the ultimate and the last one be?

      While "irregardless" may not the be ultimate atrocity vis-a-vis the English language, it's definitely at the top of the list for "words" or phrases that scream "I'm from the rattiest trailer park in the country and have actually found a way to obtain a negative education level. I actually suck the intelligence out of people that are within earshot of me." Hmm... perhaps it is the ultimate.

    13. Re:it's aftermath! by Welshalian · · Score: 1

      As Del Boy would say: Chateauneuf du Pape! (with apologies to John Sullivan: http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/onlyfools/lingo/euro.shtml)

    14. Re:it's aftermath! by Aliotroph · · Score: 1

      You assumed correctly.

    15. Re:it's aftermath! by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 1

      I don't know, Google Code allows Python, and everyone knows Guido has a time machine. Maybe they're borrowing it.

      --
      Not a sentence!
  6. Loose lips sink ships. by Mal-2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet it was your run of the mill social engineering. Someone on the attacking side befriended someone on the inside and either coaxed the information out, or just waited until they mentioned it in passing. Once they knew who to target, they could then pump this employee to see if the attack was having any effect, from the perspective of an insider.

    It could be a Facebook friend, it could be a normal face-to-face friend, or it might be a "swallow". Governments certainly use this method of social engineering, but I would be quite surprised if companies do not do it as well.

    Mal-2

    --
    How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    1. Re:Loose lips sink ships. by DarkAce911 · · Score: 1

      I was thinking Rubber-Hose Cryptology, the Secret Police threatened to beat the passwords out of Google's employees.

    2. Re:Loose lips sink ships. by tomhath · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't bother with social engineering. China's industrial espionage program is extensive and very well organized.

    3. Re:Loose lips sink ships. by indiechild · · Score: 1

      Exactly. No need for even simple social engineering when anyone on the inside would've done the job.

  7. and by snarkh · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the ultimate atrocity is the poster's use of "it's"?

  8. the Chinese staffer's name ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... is In Lieu, you insensitive clods!

    1. Re:the Chinese staffer's name ... by Xeleema · · Score: 1

      ... is In Lieu, you insensitive clods!

      Okay. Now that right there folks, that was a funny G-Nazi. Jay & Conan called, they need you to cover their timeslots today. :)

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
    2. Re:the Chinese staffer's name ... by EdgeCreeper · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for him he did it for Lo Pei.

  9. Poor Choice Of Phrasing by xdroop · · Score: 1, Informative

    Come on, guys, it's not "in lieu of". "In lieu of" means "instead; in place of; as a substitute for". So that description makes absolutely no sense. The submitter probably means "in light of".

    I know this is just slashdot, but we we have computers and the internet where all the grammar nazis have left us neat hints how to use language correctly, if not effectively. Articles like this make us all look like gibbering chimps.

    --
    you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    1. Re:Poor Choice Of Phrasing by nkcaump · · Score: 2, Funny

      but we we have computers

      Giggle... you said "we we"...

      --
      Yep.
    2. Re:Poor Choice Of Phrasing by xdroop · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, I get hit by my own irony stick. I deserved that. "we we" indeed.

      --
      you should read everything on the internet as if it had "but I'm probably talking out of my ass" appended to it.
    3. Re:Poor Choice Of Phrasing by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "You have got to be kidding me!!! Hold on I have to go take a wicked NO!"

      -Peter G.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Poor Choice Of Phrasing by TheRon6 · · Score: 1

      Right, I get hit by my own irony stick.

      Don't think of it as getting hit by your own irony stick... think of it as getting hit by your own "we we".

      --
      Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
  10. Somewhere in Mountain View... by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing all activity of Google's employees in China. And their friend. And their friend's friends. And the people they email. And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera. And all the their friends. And the people they email.

    1. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by e2d2 · · Score: 4, Funny

      ENHANCE!

    2. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by NevarMore · · Score: 5, Funny

      ..and showing them text advertisements for criminal defence lawyers.

    3. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by hellraizer · · Score: 1

      "Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing" servers that analize server traffic :D im getting dizzy ..... :P one server to analize them all :D ...

    4. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by Herkum01 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Oh my god, it was KEVIN BACON!

    5. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by CFBMoo1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Somewhere in Mountain View, servers are now analyzing all activity of Google's employees in China. And their friend. And their friend's friends. And the people they email. And everyone who got in range of a Google security camera. And all the their friends. And the people they email."

      And then, suddenly the white vans with cameras and guys in colorful hats pulls up and surrounds someones house!

      --
      ~~ Behold the flying cow with a rail gun! ~~
    6. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by Spatial · · Score: 1

      ...because it is Gmail. Right?

    7. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      You got your gerund right, but not the other two. It's analyze. I'm not sure what analize is, but I'm sure some drug traffickers could tell you.

    8. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

      During my orientation week in Mountain View, there was a joke about some hardware being stolen from campus. The punchline? "If there's one thing that Google's good at, it's searching."

    9. Re:Somewhere in Mountain View... by ghmh · · Score: 1

      Really? He's a friend of my friend's friends' friend's friend!

  11. Re:The real WTF is... by LSD-OBS · · Score: 2, Funny

    Its the kind of bad grammer we sea alot of on slashdot. Blame there editers.

    --
    Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
  12. In communist china... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    google googles you!

  13. Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Espionage is a BIG risk in all Overseas Outsourcing. The overseas employees (or foreigners brought in on L-1 or H-1b visas) are ultimately loyal to their home country. If their country orders them to spy, turn over Intellectual Property, etc., don't be surprised! Google is not the big risk. Microsoft, for example, has a big tech center in China. One must wonder what sorts of spying, back doors, trojans, are being planted in Windows!

    1. Re:Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Espionage is a tolerable cost of outsourcing because all that matters is profit. Some public embarassment will result now and then, but it is perfectly reasonable for people to put national loyalty far above any concern for a foreign corporation.

      I'd cheerfully help the US find information about any foreign company I worked for, because I have no moral obligation to a corporation and least of all one from an enemy/competing (there is no difference!) country. It is ridiculous to expect people to be loyal to foreign employers, and China has every historic reason to view all such as economic colonials!

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Espionage Big risk of Overseas Outsourcing by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

      For example, all of the cheap chinese knockoff of brand name stuff. A large portion of it is dishonest suppliers simply doing their own runs of the product and selling it to the grey market.

  14. Welcome to the new world by jonpublic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Chinese companies copied part for part GM cars and as far as I know, nothing came of it. You could literally take the door off the Chevy and put a door from the Chinese car company on it. We don't impose any trade sanctions, we just keep buying their stuff.

    I'd find the link but I don't have time.

    Hopefully this google flap will get people to pay attention to how they are catching up.

     

    1. Re:Welcome to the new world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why on earth would the US government be upset about a major foreign competitor deciding to copy GM cars?

    2. Re:Welcome to the new world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      here is the link... from 2005!

      http://www.autoblog.com/2005/04/16/chinese-copy-cats/

    3. Re:Welcome to the new world by Inda · · Score: 1

      Why is everyone surprised at this? When I worked at Land Rover's design centre in Gaydon, England, there were always two cars from rivals, stripped down, Faro arms in each corner,... You could borrow the parts just like a lending library. Everyone does it. It's good to share.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    4. Re:Welcome to the new world by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

      GM cars, another tool in Chinese government's arsenal of population control

    5. Re:Welcome to the new world by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's a link showing the top 10 copycat cars produced in China, with pics of the real deal and the rip offs. http://cars.uk.msn.com/features/photos.aspx?cp-documentid=150107488

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    6. Re:Welcome to the new world by Lakitu · · Score: 1
  15. Trojan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer.

    Yes thanks! This is definitely news to the average /. reader. I never knew that!

    1. Re:Trojan by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      It was also a people that tricked a fortified enemy city with a giant horse as a gift with solders hidden inside.

      A lesser known, at least on Slashdot, version is a condom used in an act known as 'sex' to prevent reproduction and infection transfers.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:Trojan by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      It was also a people that tricked a fortified enemy city with a giant horse as a gift with solders hidden inside.

      Actually... the horse was made by Greeks, it fooled the Trojans. (Hence the phrase; "Beware of Greeks bearing gifts".)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    3. Re:Trojan by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      knew i should have looked it up instead of just using my hazy memory of the story.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    4. Re:Trojan by lgw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The lesson from the Trojan horse should have been "beware of gifts bearing Greeks"!

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    5. Re:Trojan by dintech · · Score: 1

      And also, not the definition that most people learned decades ago. The whole concept of a concept of a Trojan is of course an innocuous piece of software masquerading as something useful that is invited into a system only then to unleash a nasty payload. If during the Trojan War, the horse had been hidden, that would have been a much cleverer attack. I guess the reporter didn't see the connection between Trojan and Trojan Horse. Also not all trojans allow access to the computer. Some just get in there to FSU.

    6. Re:Trojan by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Indeed, that form of trojan is to prevent spawning of child processes.

      And also contains an invading army brought into the guarded fortress. And when they escape, they complete the analogism of their name to the original.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  16. Re:I'm not sure I get it. by Dishevel · · Score: 1

    Probably the IP is hardened against any normal attack. My guess is they found a system that has an attack vector into the gmail system that is not as difficult as the mail servers themselves.

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  17. Google seems more Authority than Corp. by stimpleton · · Score: 1

    "Google Investigating Chinese Employees"

    Something occurred to me after I read this. I get a slight twinge that Google is more an Authority, instead of a private corporation. Its odd, If I read "Microsoft investigates..." I envision some staid corporate fumbling about, yet with Google, I feel they are almost Law Enforcement like, with big tenticles of power Joe Bloggs couldnt understand.

    Sorry, I have watching "The Wire" on DVD. Its ruined my perceptions on how things (might) work.

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:Google seems more Authority than Corp. by Spatial · · Score: 1

      Well you have more reason to believe in their investigative ability. Google deals primarily in information, with a combination of accurate search tools and advertisement targeting being some of their main sources of income.

    2. Re:Google seems more Authority than Corp. by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      While Microsoft seems to spend more time and money on disinformation these days.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  18. Re:The real WTF is... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Blame there editers.

    Blame them editers. As in "them's good eatin'". - Backwoods US Grammer Nazi

  19. Hate to say this... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hate to say this...as it does sound racist, but I know for a fact that most of the chinese employees within a company that deals with
    china, will side to help the chinese side of the deal rather then their own company that is dealing with china, also even went so far as to give out confidential info and deal breaking intel to manufacturers so as to be able to charge top dollar when they could, based on types of situations that came up.

    For me, it might sound racist, but I truly believe that they have been brainwashed to really stand by their country, even when they are of different citizenship, and even live abroad...they will still report back to the motherland to help in anyway they can.

    Is this wrong, the jews have been doing this for eons, so I guess not really, as it would be hypocritical to say this, but
    I do believe that a religion and way of life, is much different then a country's dictator's point of view of what life should be.
    I know i might get spammed with a lot of comments on my view points, but I have to say, we did this to ourselves.

    If we allow muslems to come into our country and force us to change our country's ways to allow them to continue living the way they lived back home, then why did they leave int he first place. If you want to join the RCMP and then tell them that they are not allowed to ask you to remove your turban to put on the proper RCMP uniform, you should understand that this is part of the RCMP religion, to wear the RCMP hat.

    As for chinese, if they come into the country and work for a canadian/amercian country, why would they try to still make china the
    more profitable partner in the deal....they left that country, for what ever reason...seems like they are almost doing this on purpose as if told to do so by the dictator himself...?

    1. Re:Hate to say this... by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Part of the problem is that there is essentially no punishment(in most cases lots of rewards) for doing so. The Chinese government will make sure you are well taken care of if you help a Chinese company(and lets face it, though nominally capitalist the state essentially still "owns" all enterprises in China, you cannot get rich there if the state doesn't want you to be rich). Until significant sanctions are levied against China for this kind of stunt they will continue only to get more brazen with their violations of international law and trade agreements.

  20. What's that sound? by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    WHOOSH!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
  21. Re:Incident by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 5, Informative

    Apparently something so significant happened that people can just call it "The Incident" and expect others to know about it. Yet I've never heard of anything happening to Google, or originating from Google significant enough and shocking enough to be titled "The Incident". (The worst I've heard is about their camera cars going up the occasional private road).

    Seriously?! You've been posting regularly on /. for this last week yet you somehow managed to miss nine of the most commented on stories?! Well, here they are in chronological order:
    Google Hacked, may pull out of China
    Google.cn has already lifted censorship
    Google.cn attack part of broad spying effort
    China emphasizes law as Google defies censorship
    Google attackers identified as Chinese government
    IE 0-day flaw used in Chinese attack
    Code used to attack Google now public
    German government advises public to stop using IE
    Another attack, on law firm suing China
    This is also all over the mainstream and business news (although, like all other news stories, it's secondary to the Haiti coverage).

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  22. If Google wants to do this right... by dwiget001 · · Score: 1

    ... they would interrogate these people like the ChiComs would. Make them feel right at home!

  23. Bring the suspected employees to the States by TexasTroy · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if Google could bring their Google China employees to the US and then have them charged with industrial espionage? I think a quick way of narrowing the field of candidates is to float this out there and see which rats leave the ship.

    1. Re:Bring the suspected employees to the States by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Not a chance unless they trick them into flying to the US (for a regular meeting, say) and investigate from there. In fact, anybody who refuses a quick trip to the states at this point could be given an early look I suppose.

  24. Re:The real WTF is... by gregarican · · Score: 1

    It's enough to make you want to loose your mind...

  25. What does this mean for Chinese seeking work? by vampire_baozi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Google finds anything, this could have serious reprecussions for foreign companies hiring in China and Chinese students seeking green cards/employment in the US, especially in high-tech areas. Does anyone else think that mandatory background checks might be put in place to screen candidates, beyond simply assessing technical skills?

    If so, it's a good time to be Indian or Taiwanese/Korean, if you're competing with Chinese candidates.

    Though I do hope if this doesn't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates; most of them are bright cookies, and there may come a day when US tech companies need them more than they need us.

    1. Re:What does this mean for Chinese seeking work? by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 1

      I don't think Korea is competing with China and India in this field. South Korea is a wealthy country rather like Japan, and I don't believe that any computers exist in North Korea.

      --
      Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
  26. Re:Incident by Machtyn · · Score: 1
    What part of "Google Hacked" did you miss? If we need to show you that 1 + 1 + 1 does, in fact, equal 3 (in a base 4+ environment) here it is:
    • Google Hacked...
    • IE 0-day flaw used...
    • Google Investigating ... Employees.
  27. Re:Incident by Anpheus · · Score: 1

    All of them are the same story: Chinese hacking of US businesses. In Google's case, it prompted their new China policy.

    I'm not going to repeat the stories that were linked for you, though.

  28. Re:The real WTF is... by dhall · · Score: 1

    Blame the editors.

    Or blame dem edit'rs in true backwoods vernacular.

  29. Re:Investigating? Why? by rsborg · · Score: 1
    Was about to mod you up until you suggested Google kill it's own (compromised) employees. That's stupid on so many levels.

    Google probably isn't firing them because the ones you find are the sloppy ones, and the ones you WANT to find are more clever and will require some pressure on the sloppier ones... which you lose if you terminate them as employees.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  30. That prove it again by justkeeper · · Score: 1

    That Google's plug-pulling is more about IP theft concern rather than any kind of moral concern. Otherwise where was Google's moral concern when NSA was found out to be monitoring (or spying on) all communications going in and out of the U.S?(Don't tell me Google wasn't affected). Meanwhile, I'm surprised to find out that keywords like "tiananmen", "massacre", "Mao Zedong" are searchable with Google.com from within China(confirmed in two far-away locations), which means GFW is not blocking them. Maybe there is some progress on the negotiations between Google and CCP?

  31. Re:Investigating? Why? by Xeleema · · Score: 1

    Was about to mod you up until you suggested Google kill it's own (compromised) employees. That's stupid on so many levels.

    I whole-heartedly agree, however that was merely intended sarcasm directed at the bar that the PRC has set when dealing with dissenters. A bit too subtle on the toung-in-cheek, I suppose.

    Google probably isn't firing them because the ones you find are the sloppy ones, and the ones you WANT to find are more clever and will require some pressure on the sloppier ones... which you lose if you terminate them as employees.

    True, but this brings me back to my sarcastic comment; by applying the PRC's solution to most of their problems, you eliminate 90% of the problem. Sure it amounts to setting the house on fire to roast a pig, but it gets the job done.

    Keep in mind, I don't approve of attempted mass-murder as a general rule. However, I'm really getting sick of all the malicious traffic coming out of China, and I'm curious to see a corporation apply that tactic.

    Just to watch events unfold that result in a "Terms of Employment" that would enable a legalized Supervillian-Henchman dynamic would be immensely interesting. If anyone could fund the legal research required, that would be Google.

    --
    "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
  32. Censor this? by dreams2go · · Score: 1

    Curious, is this /. post and its subject, http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/jan/18/china-google-cyber-attack, searchable within China? "I do hope if this doesn't result in hiring discrimination against Chinese candidates" "A trojan is a hidden program allowing unauthorized access to a computer." A Trojan may also be an ethnic Chinese employee in US or China working for Google. Things are not always what they appear to be. What if Chinese students or employees still have family ties to China? A good number of those ties either have Communist Party roots, coercive pressure. national loyalty, or subtle influence. Some Chinese students were in the position to go to school, get visas, or come to the US inadvertently based on their family and political ties. A background check will never uncover Party history or relationships that might make an employee a risk.