Slashdot Mirror


The Lost Film That Accompanied Empire Strikes Back

An anonymous reader writes "'Alien' and 'Star Wars' art director Roger Christian was given £25,000 by George Lucas in 1979 to make a 25-minute medieval B-feature called 'Black Angel.' This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico making 'Lucky Lady.' 'Black Angel' made a huge impression, not least because it shared the dark tone of 'Empire Strikes Back.' John Boorman showed it to the crew of 'Excalibur' as a template for how he wanted his film to look, and 'Black Angel' went on to influence films such as 'Dragonslayer' and 'Legend' throughout the 1980s and beyond. But it has not been seen by anyone since 'Empire' finished its theatrical run. Two weeks ago Roger Christian unearthed a print of a film that was thought lost forever, and in this interview he talks about 'Black Angel,' and provides the only picture from the film that has ever hit the Internet."

195 comments

  1. Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This spiritual tale of a knight on a strange quest was inspired by Christian's near-fatal fever when he fell ill in Mexico ...

    That is oddly similar to the car crash that Lucas experienced shortly before graduating high school in his Autobianchi Bianchina on June 12, 1962. It was a bad wreck that I guess was highly improbable for him to survive. He was going to be a mechanic and race cars until that accident. He is also said to have conceived the idea for "the Force" as it would grow (by assimilation of aspects of some Eastern spiritual philosophies) into the "hokey religions and ancient weapons" of Star Wars. Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.

    I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.

      This is Slashdot. That is a citation!

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people

      Wouldn't that rather be proof that you cannot really expect the future and extrapolate linearly, rather anticipate change and dynamically cope with it in an opportunistic and action-based way? eg: doing things and seeing opportunity or following intuition and drive to get to a result you yourself never could've envisioned.

    3. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people.

      Rubbish. That's confirmation bias. I bet there are lots of people who had near death experiences that just shrugged it off and didn't change a thing.

    4. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and it's more research than Lucas did to actually make Star Wars

    5. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by AndrewNeo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to research things to make up stuff, now?

    6. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by mrclisdue · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just did some research, and I found out that you don't have to do research to make stuff up.

      On another note, this guy just walked by my house, and there was a 20' tall cedar tree growing out of his ear.

      cheers,

    7. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once lived in Roger Christian's house in Crouch End, and I broke his child's bed. Sorry Roger.

    8. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      I have a bunch of those cards from back then. I should dig them out of storage. I also have some Battlestar Galactica, Buck Rogers, Space 1999 and a lot of baseball and football cards from the 70's. Would be cool to show to my daughter.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    9. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. Rolled my '72 Nova down I-90, about 50 miles east of Cle Elum. People that stopped said it rolled sideways several times and then flipped end for end. I just remember it suddenly pulling left in to the median and then there was a crowd of people around the car as the firemen pried open the drivers door. Other than a bump on the head and a scratch on one finger, I was perfectly fine. The roof of the car was crushed down to where the was just a few inches of opening where the windows were, except for over the high back bucket seats.

      Nope, no inspiration from that one. Didn't give up my geeky ways and stop playing D&D or being nervous around women or nothing.

      (Towed the car back to base, pulled the radiator out of the fan, hooked up the battery and the thing started up. I pulled the engine (from a '68 'Vette, hot rodded a bit) and ended up using it in a '76 Nova, then a '72 Camaro and finally, a '69 Camaro. I sold it with the '69 and am still kicking myself. It was a really nice engine.)

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    10. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

      I'm dying to know....

    11. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people. "
      no, it's not. thanks for trying to play.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      I'd provide a citation but I remember reading that off the back of a Topps Galaxy Star Wars card when I was a kid.

      I read the basic outline of this story in Pollock's Skywalking: The Life and Films of George Lucas . The accident clearly had an effect on his life -- he was in the hospital for months with a collapsed lung -- and at the time he was a D student, he was about to fail out of senior year and not get a diploma. He was passed out of high school mainly because his teachers took pity on him after the accident. If you ever watch his American Graffiti the Milner character is based on Lucas at that stage of his life.

      From there it goes on that he went to community college, fell in love with avant garde films (people like Brakhage and Jonas Mekas, really oddball stuff for the guy who invented the scifi blockbuster), got his GPA up, and was accepted to USC. (Fight on cinema alums!)

      There tends to be a lot of "drift" in terms of what George specifically claims he intended from time to time, though. I'd never heard that he developed the ideas about "the force" while in the hospital, for instance, though GL often tends to align history with the point he's trying to make that day. Skywalking in particular is quite clear from interviews that Lucas wanted to use literal classical music for the score of Star Wars, a la 2001, and John Williams had to talk him out of it, whereas later Lucas denied the whole business. His account of Spielberg's initial response to the Star Wars rough cut also tends to be at variance with how Spielberg remembers things (Spielberg wwas either supportive or skeptical, depending on who you ask), as is the record w/r/t Marcia, his ex-wife's contributions: she edited (and won an Oscar) for Star Wars. A complicated man.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    13. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Let me put it on Wikipeda, using this as a citation!

      The Alternate Reality Alliance
      — “Changing reality, one edit at a time!”

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    14. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by grcumb · · Score: 1

      I just did some research, and I found out that you don't have to do research to make stuff up.

      On another note, this guy just walked by my house, and there was a 20' tall cedar tree growing out of his ear.

      Q-Tip gone bad. I read some place that research shows this happens all the time.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    15. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      What! You saw Harold? Wow, Bob's grown!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      (Towed the car back to base, pulled

      Wait a second...
      You're trying to trick us!
      You're in the damn military!

      You gotta cite which branch, whether you'd just got back from the gulf and most importantly how many shots you did before this crash...

      I got my eye on you.

    17. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Let me put it on Wikipeda, using this as a citation!

      The Alternate Reality Alliance
      -- "Changing reality, one edit at a time!"

      You can try but you know we exist and will cancel your edits out... VIOLENTLY if necessary!

      The Alternate Anti-Reality Alliance
      -- "Maintaining the false reality for profit, one citation per chrono-interval!"

    18. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      and I broke his child's bed.

      Mr Hannity would like you to have a seat over there and explain exactly what you where doing in this child's bed.

    19. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by TheLink · · Score: 1

      > I just remember it suddenly pulling left in to the median and then there was a crowd of people around the car as the firemen pried open the drivers door.
      > Didn't give up my geeky ways and stop playing D&D or being nervous around women or nothing.

      That's what your new self thinks ;).

      --
    20. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Oh, this was back in '88. I was Air Force/B-52 Crew Chief.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    21. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      "Proof that near death experiences have a very profound effect on people. "
      no, it's not. thanks for trying to play.

      Depends on which side of the experience they end up I suppose.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    22. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Oh, this was back in '88. I was Air Force/B-52 Crew Chief.

      O yeah? I don't believe you... Prove IT by answering these simple questions!

      B52G or H?, What was its maximum speed?, Combat Radius?, Ferry Range?, Service Ceiling?, Rate of Climb?, How many 20mm M61 Vulcan cannons?, and lastly Mr Gilmoure if that really is your real name, what are the arming codes for the AGM-86B Air Launched NUCLEAR Cruise Missile with 150kt payload...

      Hurry now.... simple questions Mr Gilmoure, whats the hold up comrad, er I mean... friend..

    23. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Minwee · · Score: 1

      Wikipedia Brown, is that you?

    24. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      92d Bombardment Wing at Fairchild AFB from '87-'89 (Thanks GB 1 for downsizing).

      We had B-52H's and KC-135A's. A few times, we got B-52G's in from Minot. An 8 engine water burn was second loudest thing I've heard, after Space Shuttle launch.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    25. Re:Similar to Lucas' Car Crash by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      An 8 engine water burn was second loudest thing I've heard, after Space Shuttle launch.

      Hummm I was in Virginia Beach for way too long. Can you translate this experience into multiples of say an F16's flying at 120 knots, 50 feet above my condo?

      BTW, thanks for nuking anything... My grandfather brought back rock from Hiroshima. Well.. it wasn't really a rock but a piece of wood fused with iron and concrete in a rather impossible looking manner. Scary stuff...

  2. Re:Star Wars by Misanthrope · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Did you really skim that fast? This is about a completely different movie that just happens to have been made by the same art director. I'll be keeping my fingers crossed that they put out copies of this it looks really interesting.

  3. Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But do your other plans for the Black Angel story make you think twice about releasing it?

    Do you know something? I'm wrestling with this. I was talking about it yesterday. I still get letters, still get emails, there are threads on the IMDB going on and on about it - people guessing the story and how much it affected their mindsbut I just wonder if I brought it out now, thirty years later

    I haven't seen it in thirty years myself, but I wonder if its imitators have devalued it a little, the way seven years of The X-Files made Silence Of The Lambs look dated

    Exactly.

    It might look like a copy of the films and TV that it inspired, which have been in circulation ever since.

    I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them. I'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well. So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel?

    I mean, if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site. Wouldn't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over?

    I mean, even if it's just film snobs to appreciate it ... even if it's just a reason for people to brag that they've seen one of the original fantasy films ... even if it's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies ... why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree. This is not something for popular culture as much as for those few enthusiasts who would appreciate it for what it is. A NetFlix exclusive perhaps?

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally I'm wondering how Silence of the Lambs looks dated because of X-Files. Or at all for that matter.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by mpapet · · Score: 1

      why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?

      1. The currency of hollywood is revenue. Art has nothing to do with it. I know, I know, tons will differ. But the artists are employed because of the revenue created, not the other way around. Showing things for free is a universally bad thing if he wants to stay in the industry.
      2. Getting distribution is not simple or cheap. It would be a great deal of money to get started. Probably his own.
      3. The executive side of the industry would stop hiring the poor fellow for not pushing it through their distribution channel. Youtube is fine for your home videos, but not something with enough production values to qualify as a movie.
      4. He may not have distribution rights, or other rights necessary to get distribution.

      --
      http://www.maxineudall.com/2010/02/should-economists-be-sued-for-malpractice.html
    4. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by jadin · · Score: 0, Troll

      I assure you that I am quite capable of appreciating Kurosawa's Yojimbo and Sanjuro despite the fact that I had already seen Sergio Leone's Dollars Trilogy which massively borrows from them. I'm certain you were able to appreciate The Hidden Fortress after making the Star Wars Trilogy as well. So why do you doubt my ability to appreciate Black Angel?

      Speak for yourself. I have a very hard time appreciating originals after seeing their remakes etc. For one, the pacing of older films is often insanely slow for todays standards. There's the video and audio quality which is usually fairly bad, not to mention decayed since apparently it's not worth preserving. The audio quality seems to be especially harsh in this regard.

      I mean, if you choose not to release it then you have no intent to capitalize off of it and you should release it online via Veoh or YouTube or some video hosting site. Wouldn't the popularity and enjoyment from the film reward you in some way -- with it being your first film that you labored over?

      I can't believe this is a serious suggestion. A professional artist isn't going to want his film on youtube unless he has no choice. It isn't exactly known for being the haven of known artists, more like the myspace of videos.
      I also can't imagine that he needs his ego stroked, but who knows.

      I mean, even if it's just film snobs to appreciate it ... even if it's just a reason for people to brag that they've seen one of the original fantasy films ... even if it's just a chance for me to one up another person in conversation and promote my anti-social tendencies ... why wouldn't you release it in someway for the general public to digest in their homes?

      I don't understand how you can be so certain that you _deserve_ access to someone's artwork. I sure hope that last paragraph wasn't serious, because none of those are even remotely decent reasons to release something.

      +4 insightful? seriously?

    5. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      He might not want to release it because if everything since borrows so much from it, it would look cliche. What if they discovered the first "Boy meets girl" drama from 467 BC and re-released it? The plot certainly wouldn't be as novel to a modern audience. And they would probably call it "Twilight."

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    6. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      I can't believe this is a serious suggestion. A professional artist isn't going to want his film on youtube unless he has no choice. It isn't exactly known for being the haven of known artists, more like the myspace of videos. I also can't imagine that he needs his ego stroked, but who knows.

      Um, it makes a lot more sense to put videos on YouTube. Why? Because A) You aren't paying for the bandwidth B) People are on YouTube, I can guarantee you there are more users of YouTube than any other video site out there.

      I don't understand how you can be so certain that you _deserve_ access to someone's artwork. I sure hope that last paragraph wasn't serious, because none of those are even remotely decent reasons to release something.

      Why not? What benefit does the world get by not having the art shown? Same thing with literature. You don't -gain- anything from keeping things hidden. Even if something is complete crap by one person's standards, it may provide a lot of insight and entertainment to some people. Look at Franz Kafka (author of The Metamorphosis) would we have gained anything by having all of his works burned as he requested?

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    7. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

      More like "Romeo and Juliet," but Shakespeare burned the sources he plagiarized from, so we're stuck with that...

    8. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how you can be so certain that you _deserve_ access to someone's artwork.

      Perhaps because once the copyright runs out, that artwork will be public domain? At that point, if it's lost, either because it can't be found again or has degraded too much, the public will be cheated of the work it now supposedly owns.

    9. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by nine-times · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think the idea is that the X-Files borrowed some of the cinematic tricks which Silence of the Lambs used to make it so creepy. Granted, that's not the example I would have chosen, but I think it's a real problem in trying to introduce people to some kinds of art. If part of what was impressive about them at the time was that they were ground-breaking, and the ground that they broke is now well trodden, then new viewers are unlikely to be impressed.

    10. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Star Wars and the Hidden fortress really have nothing in common.

      Plus I did see the film in the theater, and if it is released, suddenly thousand or people will be claiming to have seen it in a theater~

      That said, yes please release it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, "Last Man Standing" is a better example. Modern remake of Yojimbo by Kurosawa himself, just set in Prohibition era U.S. Agree with you that it just made me appreciate Yojimbo even more, though.

    12. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is this modded funny??

    13. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A better example might be people seeing the French Connection and complaining that the car chase is too much of a cliche in a cop movie. (When they aren't aware that the French Connection is the *reason* every cop movie made since has a car chase.)

    14. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by jadin · · Score: 1

      Um, it makes a lot more sense to put videos on YouTube. Why? Because A) You aren't paying for the bandwidth B) People are on YouTube, I can guarantee you there are more users of YouTube than any other video site out there.

      Obviously he doesn't feel the need to find viewers of his films, they are seeking him out. So to release it into a proper channel, such as it's own website, would give it far more respect than youtubing it. As an artist, I wouldn't want a film released to theaters, before a Star Wars feature no less, shown on a site famous for baseballs to the crotch. (I realize there are legitimate artists on youtube, but again like I said originally, those artists are seeking out viewers.)

      Why not? ... Same thing with literature. You don't -gain- anything from keeping things hidden. Even if something is complete crap by one person's standards, it may provide a lot of insight and entertainment to some people. Look at Franz Kafka (author of The Metamorphosis) would we have gained anything by having all of his works burned as he requested?

      YOU do not get to decide what I, as an artist, or anyone but yourself for that matter, consider good enough to release to the general public. That is for the artist to decide on their own. Slashdot is all about personal freedoms, and this should be just as important. As a photographer, 95% to 99% of my photography isn't worth uploading to the internet, let alone worth printing. I don't care how many people it may provide insight or entertainment to, if I think it's crap, I'm not releasing it. To me, it lessens the quality of the rest that are actually worth releasing.

      What benefit does the world get by not having the art shown?

      It makes it easier to find the works that the artist actually cared about. I would much rather watch something the artist stood behind 100% than something he had no desire to release because he himself didn't like it. I personally don't speak or type every thought I have. I filter them so that only the ones I think are worth sharing come out. If I shared every thought I had, no one would ever want to read it or listen to it. Frankly neither would I. Filtering is a good thing.

    15. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      You've got a good point, but you and me and everyone we know will be dead by then, so I have a hard time getting worked up about it.
      I blame our Congresswhores.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    16. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by pthisis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A better example might be people seeing the French Connection and complaining that the car chase is too much of a cliche in a cop movie. (When they aren't aware that the French Connection is the *reason* every cop movie made since has a car chase.)

      I think Bullitt has more of a claim to fame as the *reason* every cop movie made has a car chase. Friedkin himself says that it was the Bullitt car chase that inspired him to try to outdo it in the French Connection.

      Whether he succeeded in doing so is a matter approximately as well-settled as the question of emacs vs. vi.

      --
      rage, rage against the dying of the light
    17. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Nethead · · Score: 5, Funny

      Some of us that get 15 new mod points everyday just get tired of moderating. Myself, I like to mod every Bruce Perens post funny, just to keep him wondering.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    18. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      in fact, in a sane world, he would have to release it in order to be protected by copyright.

      --
      ...
    19. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      YOU do not get to decide what I, as an artist, or anyone but yourself for that matter, consider good enough to release to the general public.

      It was shown in a movie theater to people who didn't have NDAs signed, so it was released to the public. The copyright started on that date (or before). When that copyright ends, that work belongs to me. Using copyright to hold up works, prevent distribution, keep them from the public, then destroying it (or locking it away so that it's never seen, which has the same effect) as it enters the public domain is the *opposite* of copyright. Copyright exists for one and only one purpose, to promote the release of works into the public domain. His actions work the opposite of copyright's sole reason for existing, and he's doing so to harm the people that will inherit the work. That's mean, spiteful, and illegal*.

      * If the federal law allows/promotes this as a general practice, then the law is in violation of the Constitution, and thus the law itself would be illegal, even if the actions taken by the copyright holder follow current federal law.

      It's funny how those that worship copyright only worship the DCMA draconian lockdown style, and not the "limited time, promote works" constraints with the goal of getting as much as possible into the public domain as fast as possible. They like the implementations that don't follow the spirit of the law, and hate the goals of copyright. They should just abandon copyright and treat all works as Trade Secrets, rather than copyright them. That's what they really want, but they also want to be able to have their trade secret displayed in public with an implied NDA on all that view it. But that, again, is the opposite of copyright.

    20. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A better example might be people seeing the French Connection and complaining that the car chase is too much of a cliche in a cop movie. (When they aren't aware that the French Connection is the *reason* every cop movie made since has a car chase.)

      Sounds like a classic case of Seinfeld is Unfunny.

    21. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Whatever, I was giving a fucking example not a scholarly thesis. Please reply to the forest, and ignore the trees.

    22. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by GoodNicksAreTaken · · Score: 1

      This is why every woman I've ever met hates Monty Python but most males I meet understand that Monty Python, at least in a sense, is the original.

    23. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by kamapuaa · · Score: 1
      I realize I'm being pedantic, but in 1922, back when German cinema was arguably the world's biggest and best, Fritz Lang's Dr. Mabuse the Gambler featured an extended car chase sequence between the Dr. Mabuse, and the investigator hot on his trails. The policeman actually first had to follow after Mabuse on a horse, before quickly getting into a car - Germany was still transitioning at the time!

      Although obviously it's been surpassed by other car chase scenes, it's uncanny how similar it is to a modern one, guns blazing and all. Maybe there's not much you can do with the basic idea.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    24. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Obviously he doesn't feel the need to find viewers of his films, they are seeking him out. So to release it into a proper channel, such as it's own website, would give it far more respect than youtubing it.

      Yeah, and I'm sure -anyone- would be thrilled with having loads of bandwidth used up. The main perk about YouTube is A) You don't have to make a cross-platform player and B) You don't have to pay for bandwidth. A popular video isn't going to be cheap to host.

      As an artist, I wouldn't want a film released to theaters, before a Star Wars feature no less, shown on a site famous for baseballs to the crotch. (I realize there are legitimate artists on youtube, but again like I said originally, those artists are seeking out viewers.)

      Um, I'm not really seeing the difference here. Its a bit like putting a work of art in a very popular publicly funded museum rather than opening up a separate one. Yes, some people's art may be different than your own, but its a lot easier, cheaper and nearly cost-free.

      YOU do not get to decide what I, as an artist, or anyone but yourself for that matter, consider good enough to release to the general public. That is for the artist to decide on their own

      Um, he thought it was good enough to release back in theatres, this should be reason alone to release it again.

      That is for the artist to decide on their own. Slashdot is all about personal freedoms, and this should be just as important. As a photographer, 95% to 99% of my photography isn't worth uploading to the internet, let alone worth printing. I don't care how many people it may provide insight or entertainment to, if I think it's crap, I'm not releasing it. To me, it lessens the quality of the rest that are actually worth releasing.

      So? Don't publish it in the first place. This is akin to you uploading a picture everyone thought was really good, then suddenly taking it down, and there are no copies left. You aren't being artistic, you are being a dick to your fans.

      Yeah, its a personal freedom to choose not to release something, but once you've released it, if you have fans, you should release it again.

      Back in the days before copyright it was very simple, you published and it was considered to be released, anyone could take from it, add to it, and in general appreciate it. Didn't want something published? Don't send it to the press. This guy didn't just create it and not release it but he released it -to the theatre- and now is trying to take it back. A possibly important part of our culture could be forever lost.

      By the time copyright expires, the film itself may not even survive. Steps must be taken to archive it in a lasting medium. Look at how many works done -on paper- have been lost that were well-preserved, now take film that deteriorates more rapidly and to greater loss (a phrase is still readable even when missing a few letters, but a frame of film missing some parts is a lot harder).

      It makes it easier to find the works that the artist actually cared about. I would much rather watch something the artist stood behind 100% than something he had no desire to release because he himself didn't like it. I personally don't speak or type every thought I have. I filter them so that only the ones I think are worth sharing come out. If I shared every thought I had, no one would ever want to read it or listen to it. Frankly neither would I. Filtering is a good thing.

      Filtering is a good thing, yes. The point being though this wasn't "filtered" he wouldn't be releasing some random thoughts, or even his diary or even a few scraps of paper but a movie released in theatres.

      The fact is, if there are a few notes you don't want to publish, fine, don't publish them. When you release a movie to theatres, have fans who want to see it, have easy ways to put it online for your fans to see, and don't. You aren't being artistic, you are being a dick.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    25. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by jadin · · Score: 1

      Um, I'm not really seeing the difference here. Its a bit like putting a work of art in a very popular publicly funded museum rather than opening up a separate one. Yes, some people's art may be different than your own, but its a lot easier, cheaper and nearly cost-free.

      No, it's like putting up artwork in a museum, versus on a billboard. The billboard would get a ton more eyeballs, and be "cheaper", but the museum is actually respected as an art venue.

      When you release a movie to theatres, have fans who want to see it, have easy ways to put it online for your fans to see, and don't. You aren't being artistic, you are being a dick.

      If he feels it isn't standing up to the test of time, he has every right to not re-release it. Fact is this isn't public domain (yet - whether it should be or not is something to argue with disney and friends), therefore it's still his property to do what he wants with. Once his copyright is expired, then yes, take it from his dead hands and post it on youtube. Until then, or until copyright laws are changed, it's still his property, and right to choose what happens to it.

    26. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      My drama teacher used an analogy like that many years ago. He told a joke about a guy who had never seen Shakespeare, so he went to a play. His friend asks him "So...how did you like Shakespeare? Wasn't it the most amazing thing you've ever seen?" and the guy says "Ah, it was just a bunch of clichés."

    27. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would someone please just post a link to the torrent file already?

    28. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know that their is a whole world out there without access to netflix ?

    29. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Had this guy died yesterday, this work would likely be gone forever.
      End the copyrigth madness NOW !

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    30. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by psnyder · · Score: 1

      That's how I felt when I read Beowulf after seeing Jaws. Those Brits blatantly ripped off Spielberg.

    31. Re:Oh Just Release It to the Public Already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, Seinfeld is unfunny because it sucks and is not funny, period.

  4. Re:Star Wars by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds. Posting a question like:

    What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?

    ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.

    Secondly, with regards to:

    It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting

    ...please see Moonraker.

    Finally, you can turn in your geek card at the door on your way out. Thanks for playing.

  5. and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "While James Cameron was on a trip to Italy he became very ill with high fever. One night he had a terrible nightmare about a huge robot with red-glowing eyes that was trying to kill him."

    1. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I once had a fever dream that I would be up-ranked to +5 Insightful after making a meaningless self-referential post as an AC on Slashdot.

    2. Re:and ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the Cylons were born. It was the Cylons, right?

      --
      Huh?
    3. Re:and ... by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      You know that feeling when your leaning back in a chair and almost fall but catch yourself at the last instant? I feel like that all the time.

    4. Re:and ... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Man, these guys have wild dreams and become billionaire filmmakers.

      In my dreams, I have to take an exam that I didn't study for, and I'm naked, and then I fall from a high place. That's it.

      No wonder I ain't never did shit.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    5. Re:and ... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 1

      "...while watching an episode of The Outer Limits inspired by an earlier short story somewhat similar to the premise of The Terminator."

    6. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zomg! Stephen Wright posts on slashdot.

    7. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Close. Terminators.

    8. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget that George McFly had no dreams of becoming a successful writer until he had a near-death experience with Darth Vader from the planet Vulcan!

    9. Re:and ... by Zordak · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "While James Cameron was on a trip to Italy he became very ill with high fever. One night he had a terrible nightmare about a huge robot with red-glowing eyes that was trying to kill him."

      Weird that he skipped the red-glowing eyes. But I guess that would've made it too blatantly obvious from the very beginning that Kate Winslet was the evil robot.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    10. Re:and ... by Internal+Modem · · Score: 2, Funny

      The film's success would depend on who you cast as the lead....

    11. Re:and ... by Thud457 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't forget Doc Brown had no dreams of time travel and becoming a successful scieceman until he had a near-death experience with a toilet and discovered the benzene ring structure.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    12. Re:and ... by dcollins · · Score: 1

      Your Jedi mind-tricks don't work on us!

      Oh, uh... oh, geez.

      The Force is strong with this one.

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    13. Re:and ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Too bad you ended up getting the points as an AC. Bummer.

      --
      Huh?
    14. Re:and ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that William Adama had no dreams of Earth and wanting to save the remnants of humanity until he had a near death experience with a Dyson Sphere and a ration of Soylent Green....

      --
      Huh?
    15. Re:and ... by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I think he was 30 years old.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    16. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yay Stephen Wright!!

    17. Re:and ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot: the place where the dreams come true.

  6. Re:Star Wars by DIplomatic · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting

    My guess is you're pretty young because the 11th James Bond film was Moonraker, which sent Bond into space.

  7. Re:Star Wars by wjousts · · Score: 1

    James Bond like movie in space setting

    You mean Moonraker?

  8. Re:Star Wars by eldavojohn · · Score: 2

    We don't really live like that, do we?

    Welcome to the genre known as SciFi/Fantasy ... where you can escape from your gravity bound simple life and dream ...

    Take your coat off and stay awhile, it's amazingly liberating when your imagination puts you in a rebel starfighter going up against insane odds trying to take down the big bad evil empire with the ability to wield a sabre of light while controlling the very concepts of physics ... or at least it did for me when I was a youth.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  9. Executive Producer's Cut re-release by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adding Jar-Jar to the Executive Producer's Cut re-release was a huge mistake and totally ruined the film for me. Everything Lucas touches turns to crap! Stop raping my childhood!
     
    /Never actually saw the film.

    1. Re:Executive Producer's Cut re-release by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      What if they replaced all the humans in the Star Wars movie with Jar-Jar aliens?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
  10. Re:Star Wars by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think he's just making a general comment on Star Wars in a thread tangentially related.

    And his bridge probably misses its troll.

  11. Re:Star Wars by Pojut · · Score: 1

    What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway? Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space. We don't really live like that, do we? I don't personally understand the geeks fanware behind it either, it's more like soap opera in space. It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then

    At this point? Nostalgia, mostly. Keep in mind that when it came out, there was literally nothing else like it.

    As for myself, I was born in '84, but the Star Wars trilogy was still the first time I ever saw a movie like that (5 years old...young enough to appreciate it, old enough to remember it). Going back and watching it now, for myself, it's mostly nostalgia...they're really campy, and the special effects aren't aging well at this point (although watching the THX version (NOT the version with the CGI) helps alleviate some of the aging issues.)

  12. Priming The Proletariat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for another Star Wars film.

    One word: marketing.

    Yours In Astrakhan,
    Kilgore Trout

  13. Digital Dark Age by headkase · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In those days history was lost because of issues with physically duplicating things. Nowadays, it is being lost because we don't own the keys to the digital locks. Perhaps in twenty years we'll come to our senses and retroactively permit the breaking of today's encryption then - for what survived.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Digital Dark Age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, what was that? I couldn't hear you over all these pirated Blu-ray movies that have been ripped into completely unprotected formats and widely distributed.

    2. Re:Digital Dark Age by headkase · · Score: 1

      Popular will always survive, the little things perhaps not. Also, perhaps the Library of Congress with their copy (are those unencumbered?) should hold a "Cultural Event Day" every week where they select something from their archive and distribute it without restrictions. Or further to this issue: where is the line between preservation, teaching, and culture vs making money.

      --
      Shh.
    3. Re:Digital Dark Age by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Exactly, in the end I think we will have more information from the past century then we will of the present century. Everything has been so locked down in incompatible file formats. Yes, piracy will preserve and archive some popular works, but for everything else it will simply be lost. We look so regretfully on historical documents we have lost, yet we are blinded to see that 50 years or less from now we might not even have working copies of software, movies, music and e-books that have shaped our generation.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    4. Re:Digital Dark Age by currently_awake · · Score: 1

      I suggest that to obtain a copyright, you must submit a (non DRM encumbered) copy to a central government department. And that department would be legally required to keep it forever. And when the copyright ends you could legally download it, for free. We've lost far too much already, and not just obscure stuff. The entire Parry Mason book series is crumbling to dust as we speak, to be lost forever.

    5. Re:Digital Dark Age by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      However, there is lots and lots of garbage out there that doesn't warrant preservation.

      Who's gonna filter that? Nobody you say? OK - who's going to sort/index/catalog the massive pile of garbage so the few diamonds contained within are discoverable within reason? Certainly not you, no... it's Somebody Else's Problem.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:Digital Dark Age by sixsixtysix · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, it is being lost because we don't own the keys to the digital locks.

      also, the stuff that wasn't deemed profitable enough or had too much ownership dispute to even put on dvd. stuff that will never see the [legal] light of day again.

      --
      ...
  14. Every scene ends with a wipe? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I mean, if his _Battlefield Earth_ is anything to go by..

    Also, did he hold the camera straight?

    1. Re:Every scene ends with a wipe? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      Indeed, Roger Christian is most .. um... noted nowadays for having directed Battlefield Earth , a job he got, one suspects, on the basis of his credit as second unit director on TPM. You can see him in a lot of the behind-the-scenes footage, he's the one with the English accent and the long gray hair.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
  15. Re:Star Wars by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    It would be interesting to see a James Bond like movie in space setting, because at least then

    "at least then" ... what?

    Come on, why did you choke? It was about half naked, sultry space women who need to be rescued and / or turned as a double agent.

    Right?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  16. Really? What was the distribution on this? by dschuetz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters (I think it was like day 5). I distinctly remember the theater, the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour, and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater, but I do not remember this film. Perhaps it was just too weird for me, but somehow I'd think that it would've been talked about amongst my friends and such.

    So was this included with all prints, or just selected theaters in selected cities?

    1. Re:Really? What was the distribution on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw TESB the first week it was in theaters (I think it was like day 5). I distinctly remember the theater, the standing in line wrapping around the building in downtown DC for like an hour, and I think I can even picture the interior of the theater, but I do not remember this film. Perhaps it was just too weird for me, but somehow I'd think that it would've been talked about amongst my friends and such.

      So was this included with all prints, or just selected theaters in selected cities?


      It sounds like you saw TESB at the Uptown, which is a theater where a fair number of films have their DC premiere. Even if the Black Angel was shown on only a handful of screens, that's precisely the kind of theater where it would have been shown.

    2. Re:Really? What was the distribution on this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw Empire on day 2 (snuck out of high school at lunch) at the Uptown and again the following week. "Black Angel" was not shown there.

    3. Re:Really? What was the distribution on this? by dschuetz · · Score: 1

      It sounds like you saw TESB at the Uptown

      Lol. Good guess, but no. Saw it a few miles north, across from WTTG. Not sure that theater's even still there (can't find it on Street View, looks like a furniture store now). [Ha! Found it! "KB Cinema." And the link even describes TESB, complete with the line. :) ]

      I used to love the Uptown (saw reissues of 2001 and the "director's cut" Blade Runner there, among other films), but now it's just too far to go. And the last couple times I'd been there I had bad experiences -- for one, the doors to the lobby open RIGHT INTO the auditorium, so anytime anyone came in our out of the theater you'd get bright light flooding onto one or the other side of the screen. (Maybe they've fixed this in the last 10 years).

      Agreed, though, if it were anywhere, I'd've banked on Uptown.

  17. Forget Angel and Empire by owlnation · · Score: 1

    The movie to see was the one that (more or less) accompanied the original Star Wars in 1976 -- namely "Alice in Wonderland: An X-rated Musical Fantasy". By far the better movie, a great piece of art that should have been the one that bore 5 sequels.

    1. Re:Forget Angel and Empire by dan828 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just so long as Natalie Portman does those sequels as well.

    2. Re:Forget Angel and Empire by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      Miyuki-chan in Wonderland anyone?

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  18. Re:Star Wars by Sanat · · Score: 1

    And some of us never grow up and thus we still enjoy such things and remain eternally youthful... and I guess eternally hopeful as well.

    I always suspected you eldavojohn too were likewise eternally young from your many posts.

    --
    And in the end, the love you take is equal to the love you make
  19. Black Angel - The Series. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Joss Whedon's new urban spin-off of Angel with Samuel L. Jackson as the vampire cursed with a soul... "Welcome to the Hellmouth," mother-fucker.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      You're onto something. I would watch the hell out of that.

    2. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Hellooo HBO!

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    3. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      No you wouldn't.

      It would be on Fox, and they'd show them in a random order, and then pull the show and put up repeats of American Idol.

      Whedon's Angel would then get shoved into the Sunday midnight slot, then cancelled after 5 episodes. Three years later, you'll buy the series for $25 at Walmart.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      ... would then get shoved into the Sunday midnight slot, then cancelled after 5 episodes. Three years later, you'll buy the series for $25 at Walmart.

      Not that we're bitter...

      I'm kind of torn on the whole Firefly fiasco, on one hand the best SciFi TV show of all time died in childbirth, on the other hand we have an absolutely amazing work of art: one seasons worth of episodes that are unsullied by the eventual shark-jumping that would have eventually happened.

      Though I would LOVE to know where Whedon intended to go with Shepard Book.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    5. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Joss Whedon's new urban spin-off of Angel with Samuel L. Jackson as the vampire cursed with a soul... "Welcome to the Hellmouth," mother-fucker.

      Actually a joint project with Tarentino. I can hear the twangy 70s blacksploitation music now. Tarentino will co-star as the nerdy but cool street talking pedophile of the team. Samuel L. Jackson plays the night school principal whose favorite weapon is an Uzi firing wooden bullets.

    6. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Oh thank god. I was worried it was going to be a movie starring Martin Lawrence as a wise-cracking [blank] who dies but gets sent back to earth so that he can [blank] while continuing to crack wise.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    7. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Internalist · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you meant...

      Joss Whedon's new urban spin-off of Angel with Samuel L. Jackson as the vampire cursed with soul...

      :D

      --
      Research is what I'm doing when I don't know what I'm doing. -- Wernher von Braun
    8. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That would be a hell of a lot better then his Jedi character.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, this is bitter:

      Yay! A Firefly fan!

      I really missed this. You know, the random, fanatically obsessed Firefly fans that have to enter every conversation about TV shows, movies, or pretty much anything, and go on at great length about how great Firefly is, how it is so much better than every other thing a humans have ever produced, and how tragic it is that the show was canceled before its time.

      Firefly fans are, hands down, the most annoying fans ever.

    10. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      I'm kind of torn on the whole Firefly fiasco, on one hand the best SciFi TV show of all time died in childbirth, on the other hand we have an absolutely amazing work of art: one seasons worth of episodes that are unsullied by the eventual shark-jumping that would have eventually happened.

      I feel the same way about that and Defying Gravity - $35 for complete series (1 season) - sigh.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    11. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Firefly fans are, hands down, the most annoying fans ever.

      Clearly you've never met an "Idol" fan. *shudder*

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    12. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except the shark jumping was all crammed into Serenity.

    13. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Though I would LOVE to know where Whedon intended to go with Shepard Book.

      Why, didn't you see the movie?

    14. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Though I would LOVE to know where Whedon intended to go with Shepard Book.

      Why, didn't you see the movie?

      That ending for Book was unsatisfying... it felt like the two who die are just getting written out on the actors request but left the others available for sequels... felt cheap.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    15. Re:Black Angel - The Series. by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      yes, but THEN I'd watch the shit out of it.

  20. UK / Canada only by dschuetz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Okay, checking on IMDB it seems like this was only released in the UK and Canada. So my memory of, Christ, 30-year-old movie experiences, is not yet faulty.

    1. Re:UK / Canada only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was also shown in Australian cinemas IIRC

  21. Re:Star Wars by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Holy Roman Empire? You think that there were arenas in Germany during the middle ages? Remember the mnemonic: 'The Holy Roman Empire was neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire.'

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  22. Re:Star Wars by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    At this point? Nostalgia, mostly. Keep in mind that when it came out, there was literally nothing else like it.

    In many ways, there's still nothing else like it. It is a whole universe, created from scratch. Not just an extrapolation of our own, and not just the pieces you need to see for the story. Humans are common, but not special in any particular way. They mix with aliens and robots completely, and deal with each other as equals. There are lots of places where a race is shown once, in a background character, and never seen again. Most movies wouldn't bother: It's just extra expense.

    There's a feeling of history and depth to the movies (especially the original trilogy), that's nearly unique. You can write thousands of books about what else is happening in the universe, because it is a universe, and not just a setting for the story.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  23. Re:Star Wars by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds. Posting a question like: "What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?" ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung. "

    I hope you're right, but it appears the mods have gone to lunch, because as of right now it's moderated: "(Score:1, Insightful)" :-O

    today is a sad day for /. when an anti-star wars post is moderated insightful

    Why doesn't he just finish off the rest of us and post how stupid star trek is

    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  24. Re:Star Wars by vlm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In many ways, there's still nothing else like it. It is a whole universe, created from scratch. Not just an extrapolation of our own, and not just the pieces you need to see for the story. Humans are common, but not special in any particular way. .... There are lots of places where a race is shown once, in a background character, and never seen again.

    Lord of the Rings did it first, and better. Also, Ringworld, to some extent.

    Note, about 95% of the population does not realize the LOTR series was a book for some decades before the recent movies. I've actually heard people refer to the LOTR books as being "novelizations of the movies". Um, no.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  25. Re:Star Wars by Chyeld · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dude, what are you? Magnetically attracted to trolls? This one didn't even finish his thought at the end of the comment and you still had to treat it like a legitimate comment. Troll food. That's what you are, TROLL FOOD.

  26. Re:Star Wars by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 1

    Oh, lots of books have done it, and many have done it better.

    Movies though... There are only a very few others that have even tried.

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
  27. Re:Star Wars by codegen · · Score: 1

    ...please see Moonraker

    This lapse is actually probably understandable since most of us have tried to forget that we ever watched that particular movie. It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  28. Re:Star Wars by mrclisdue · · Score: 3, Funny

    ....Why doesn't he just finish off the rest of us and post how stupid star trek is

    That has to be posted?

  29. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, what are you? Magnetically attracted to trolls? This one didn't even finish his thought at the end of the comment and you still had to treat it like a legitimate comment. Troll food. That's what you are, TROLL FOOD.

    Uhhh, I'd guess that he's a misanthrope.

  30. Re:Star Wars by Pojut · · Score: 1

    I know that they aren't movies (at least, not yet ::shiver::) but the Elder Scrolls series, Mass Effect, and Dragon Age all contain just about everything you have talked about.

  31. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOM NOM NOM

  32. Re:Star Wars by insufflate10mg · · Score: 1, Troll

    Sad that the editors of Slashdot had to claim it was a film that accompanied Empire Strikes Back when it was nothing even close to that. Crazy what they'll do for a few extra bucks in advertising views huh?

  33. Apparently the Internet can't handle it. by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

    Database Error: Unable to connect to the database:Could not connect to MySQL

  34. Re:Star Wars by JonStewartMill · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was about to suggest "Outland" as another "James Bond in space" movie -- hey, it even has Sean Connery! Then I remembered that it was actually more like "High Noon in space."

  35. Re:Star Wars by SeanFlotre · · Score: 1

    This lapse is actually probably understandable since most of us have tried to forget that we ever watched that particular movie. It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.

    Hey!..Moonraker was expensive.

  36. Re:Star Wars by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Phasers > Blasters.

    'nuff said.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  37. Re:Star Wars by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    There was this movie with this run down bar scene... oh, wait.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  38. Re:Star Wars by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Those fuckin' hobbit movies were boring as hell. All it was, was a bunch of people walking. Three movies of people walking to a fucking volcano.

  39. Re:Star Wars by Smauler · · Score: 1

    _Anyone_ can create a whole universe from scratch. It is easy as hell. Making it interesting and coherent is the main challenge. A universe that is either interesting or coherent is pretty useless. By the standards of its time, Star Wars was astonishingly interesting, and relatively coherent (though the latter has dwindled with subsequent releases). LoTR has brilliant coherency, and is by popular opinion interesting too (though I can't generally see the attraction).

  40. Re:Star Wars by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

    +1

  41. Re:Star Wars by skam240 · · Score: 1

    What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway? Star Wars in general mixes mostly Holy Roman Empire time with the arenas, races and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.

    You seem to be mixing the Holy Roman Empire up with the Roman Empire as the Holy Roman Empire was most certainly not known for arenas and racing. As for the "and idea behind jedi's with future living in space.", I believe you're referring to the Jedi's being roughly equivalent to medieval knights in space. A more apt comparison would be with Arthurian legend as real knights, like those who were active in the Holy Roman Empire, don't have much in common with Star Wars Jedi aside from the sword play.

    We don't really live like that, do we?

    That's the whole point of fiction...

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  42. Re:Star Wars by Internal+Modem · · Score: 1

    Well, if you are going to bring some books to the discussion, I would include Lucas' source material, the epics of Homer.

  43. only picture from the film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Allow me to be one of the many who will posit

    ZOMG TORRENT PLZ

  44. Re:Star Wars by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    Because of the sound, right?!?!?

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  45. Re:Star Wars by g0bshiTe · · Score: 1

    Yeah but Outland was sooo much better than Moonraker.

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  46. Re:Star Wars by CowboyRobot · · Score: 1

    ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.

    You will surely get hanged. Alas, none of us here are, or ever will be, hung.

    --
    every stain tells a story
  47. Re:Star Wars by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

    ... or perhaps 'Hidden Fortress'.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  48. Re:Star Wars by geekoid · · Score: 1

    ". They mix with aliens and robots completely, and deal with each other as equals."
    err.. No tey don't. Robots are slaves. Only the few enlightened people attempt to treat them as equals.

    TO say it's not an extrapolation of our own universe is really just stupid.

    Proof?

    " Humans are common,"
    If it is not an extrapolation, then why are there humans?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  49. Re:Star Wars by esocid · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sad that the editors of Slashdot had to claim it was a film that accompanied Empire Strikes Back when it was nothing even close to that. Crazy what they'll do for a few extra bucks in advertising views huh?

    Que?

    If you are old enough to have seen the original release of The Empire Strikes Back at the cinema in 1980, you almost certainly remember the extraordinary short film that preceded it. Otherwise you won't know a damn thing about it: with not one picture or accurate plot summary anywhere on the web, Black Angel has become a bit of an internet holy grail in itself.

    FTFA

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  50. Re:Star Wars by geekoid · · Score: 1

    you mean besides Star Trek, Alien, Lost in Space, Forbidden Planet, Cowboy Bebop, Godzilla, Mork and Mindy did it for crying out loud.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  51. Ditto by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I saw TESB first night (at midnight, thank you) in Southern Maine, and I don't recall anything about this 'short'.

    And I was checking the room, and had to stay to the first reel.

    So where indeed was 'Black Angel' shown? Not out in the woods, I can tell ya.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    1. Re:Ditto by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Neither did I, but I confess I was standing in line for what seemed like AGES before I got to sit down... :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  52. Re:Star Wars by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    First, this is slashdot, a website for nerds. Posting a question like:

    What's the interest in Star Wars movies anyway?

    ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.

    Randal, is that you?

  53. Re:Shepard Book by Phrogman · · Score: 1

    Yeah, one of the more disappointing aspects of them canning the series was the fact that some story lines didn't get completely evolved, and Book was a great character.

    I really don't know why shows like this do get canceled, when there is such utter derivative crap on TV - actually come to think of it almost everything I see on TV these days is utter derivative low-budget crap...

    When they added all those other channels, the amount of money available for TV show production remained a constant I guess, so now instead of a few channels producing shows worth watching, we have hundreds of channels each producing piles of steaming shit for the masses on almost no budget.

    --
    "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  54. strange movie by forgottenusername · · Score: 1

    The picture I see from the link reads:

    Database Error: Unable to connect to the database:Could not connect to MySQL

    That sure sounds dark and futuristic.. maiiseeqwell

  55. where can we download it? by darkeye · · Score: 1

    so that he found a copy, where can we download it? :)

  56. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude its sopssa, I dunno if he's ESL or just young and ignorant, but hes easy to spot because he's either posting something pretty stupid (or trolling) and/or with exceedingly awkward english.

    Despite the fact that he posts on ALL slashdot articles nearly 24/7, his posts are always just wastes of bytes and screen space.

  57. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...please see Moonraker.

    ...please don't.

  58. Re:Star Wars by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    It would be nice to see a more credible Bond movie with a space theme that doesn't devolve to a cheap version of Barbarella.

    Moonraker had probably 4-5 times the budget of Barbarella, actually. :)

    But I know what you meant. Just wanted to snark.

  59. Re:Shepard Book by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

    It's ROI.

    Shows like Survivor, American Idol, and other "reality" shows garner huge ratings, big advert revenue, and supplementary streams with the $1-per-vote call-ins. They cost less than shows with CG and writing and make more. You can't sell against that.

    Book's past wouldn't have ever been revealed. He gave up his past life and forgave himself. The guy he used to be was dead and there was no need to speak of him.

    --

    ---
    ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
  60. Roots? by earlymon · · Score: 1

    A spiritual work set in the middle ages with amazing cinematography and music, Black Angel took the gritty medieval realism of Monty Python And The Holy Grail and returned it to its roots in Mallory, Tennyson and Kurosawa.

    I don't know - here's the Holy Grail returned to another root....

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=luVjkTEIoJc

    Space epic.... coincidence? I think not!

    --
    Pathological kinda promises Path + Logical - but instead, you get stuck with pathetic.
  61. Re:Star Wars by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

    I hope you're right, but it appears the mods have gone to lunch, because as of right now it's moderated: "(Score:1, Insightful)" :-O

    FYI, sopssa uses alts to moderate his own posts.

    Everyone knows that people tend to up-mod posts that have already been up-modded; he uses this to his advantage.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  62. Re:Star Wars by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

    If it is not an extrapolation, then why are there humans?

    Because the actors are human, of course. Same reason most of the Star Trek aliens looked like humans with odd makeup.

    --

    "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  63. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because he's gone to the Dark Side and enjoys our suffering! :O

  64. Re:Star Wars by IMightB · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I always enjoyed authors who put effort into creating/detailing their own universe, I really enjoy Dune for the same reason. I'd also like to add the Foundation Series/LoR/Chronicles of Narnia.

    I also supremely enjoyed the Red/Blue/Green Mars series.

  65. Re:Star Wars by c6gunner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, if you are going to bring some books to the discussion, I would include Lucas' source material, the epics of Homer.

    Oh come on ... The Simpsons was a decent show, but hardly an epic!

    And, anyway, what's that got to do with books?

  66. I don't believe it! by Hitman_Frost · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Finally, I find this by chance and find the name of the short film I've been trying to find out about for the last 30 years...

    And it's not available to buy... *sigh*

  67. See the "The Seven Ups" car scene by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See the "The Seven Ups" car scene.
    IIRC it was directed by the same guy that directed the French Connection car scene.
    The end when they ram into a parked 18-wheeler is especially stunning.

    Otherwise, merely an OK movie. A passable C-.

    Seven Ups was a 1973 Roy Scheider (Jaws, 2010, French Conneciton) film, and available on Netflix's VoD.

  68. Re:Star Wars by Fred_A · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah but Outland was sooo much better than Moonraker.

    But not than Barbarella.

    "Do you want to come and play with me? For someone like you I charge nothing. You're very pretty, Pretty-Pretty"
    "My name isn't pretty-pretty, it's Barbarella."

    Even the dialogues leave Moonraker in the dust.

    --

    May contain traces of nut.
    Made from the freshest electrons.
  69. Re:Star Wars by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    I disagree. I'd rather have Han's blaster than any era trek phaser.

    --
    Huh?
  70. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Note, about 95% of the population does not realize the LOTR series was a book for some decades before the recent movies.

    You are talking out of your ass.

  71. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lightsabers. They are the coolest weapons ever.

  72. Re:Star Wars by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    At this point? Nostalgia, mostly. Keep in mind that when it came out, there was literally nothing else like it.

    In many ways, there's still nothing else like it. It is a whole universe, created from scratch.

    Not created from scratch. Recycled from other material.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  73. Re:Star Wars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They mix with aliens and robots completely, and deal with each other as equals

    Tell that to the droids with the restraining bolts...

  74. Re:Shepard Book by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    Book's past wouldn't have ever been revealed. He gave up his past life and forgave himself. The guy he used to be was dead and there was no need to speak of him.

    Quite likely, you'd only be allowed to learn his past in a final series finale. But my question was not where did he come from, but where is he going.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  75. Isn't there a law... by ignavus · · Score: 1

    Isn't there some law that says you have to put these kinds of films on YouTube? Anyway, there ought to be.

    You cannot just announce that a really influential film was made and not put it on YouTube. That's unfair. It's like eating a chocolate bar in front of your friends and refusing to share it.

    --
    I am anarch of all I survey.
  76. Re:Star Wars by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

    Actually, blasters do sound better than phasers. But phasers rock everything else.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  77. Re:Star Wars by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nuh-uh.

    --
    You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
  78. Re:Star Wars by genner · · Score: 1

    ...is likely to get you flogged and/or hung.

    You will surely get hanged. Alas, none of us here are, or ever will be, hung.

    I'm hung......of course I'll never get to use it but it's huge.

  79. Re:Star Wars by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Just don't count Alien:Resurrection. Still, the world created in Aliens is still "earth"... Everything in your list (I don't know about Cowboy Bebop) originates on earth... not "a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away."

    I know you put Mork & Mindy in there for the laugh track, and it doesn't diminish Alien or Trek... but Star Wars was something else... it wasn't earth. They looked human, and the world was fully realized. There was stuff going on, even before the S.E.'s. It was grimy, dirty, and lived-in. It wasn't 2001. And for that, Lucas should be praised.

    They are still my favorite movies of all time, and I saw A New Hope at a DRIVE IN theater in Santa Clara, California for crying out loud. :) No movie, not even the mighty Blade Runner has stuck with me and fully enveloped my life like Star Wars. All other movies I watch are compared to them. I grew up living, breathing, and experiencing Star Wars. Sure I made Lucas rich, but I thank him for some great stories (so they were old hat) set in a universe that was cool. There was no Prime Directive... no one was attempting to make out with the green alien chick, and the menace was larger, more sinister and more expansive than Aliens who suck your face. (That's not to say I don't enjoy Trek and Alien... Aliens is my favorite of the series, and I love the director's cut of Alien 3). I just love Star Wars MUCH more. I am truly a Star Wars fanatic.

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  80. Re:Star Wars by genner · · Score: 1

    In many ways, there's still nothing else like it. It is a whole universe, created from scratch. Not just an extrapolation of our own, and not just the pieces you need to see for the story. Humans are common, but not special in any particular way. .... There are lots of places where a race is shown once, in a background character, and never seen again.

    The Chronicles of Narnia did it first, and better. Also, Ringworld, to some extent.

    Note, about 95% of the population does not realize the LOTR series was a book for some decades before the recent movies. I've actually heard people refer to the LOTR books as being "novelizations of the movies". Um, no.

    Fixed that...etc....etc.... Tolkin only wrote LOTR because he a Lewis flipped a coin to decide what to write next.

  81. Re:Star Wars by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

    Everything was created from existing material. The "nothing new under the sun" is pretty commonplace in our Western Civilization.

    That's not to say that Lucas didn't blend the existing material into a wonderful package that enthralled millions. (because he did. heh.)

    --
    It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  82. My Living Doll by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    What I'd like them to unearth is the television series My Living Doll.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  83. Jamil Nasir's "Book of St. Farrin" by MikeMc · · Score: 1

    Before reading TFA, my first thought was that someone had finally made a movie of this most excellent short story. Oh well, I can hope.

    --
    Marco...that was Portugese.
  84. Re:Star Wars by localtoast · · Score: 1

    Long ago, in a thread tangentially related...

  85. Re:Star Wars by FrankDrebin · · Score: 2, Informative

    What happened to you slashdot? First funny comments were getting modded insightful for karma. Now insightful posts are getting modded funny. Has the whole world goNE CRAZY?

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  86. Slashdot... Where dreams come true. by VShael · · Score: 1

    Now where's my natalie portman and hot grits?

  87. Re:Star Wars by sopssa · · Score: 1

    I wish, but /. system rarely gives me any mod points.

  88. Was very young... but might have seen this. by ZXDunny · · Score: 1

    Now I have no idea if I am talking about the same movie, but when I was very small, my dad took me to see ESB (I was a SW nut at that point, being about 6 years old). The theatre that showed it was running two films one after another - and I remember being quite disappointed when we walked in - I briefly saw the end of the previous film (ESB, the starscape after Luke gets his hand repaired, Han buggers off in t'Falcon), then a pause and then... This incomprehensible short film about a knight in some dark woods - followed by the main event. I have no idea what that film was, but this sounds eerily like it. Possible?

    --
    10 PRINT "SCUNTHORPE"(2 TO 5): GO TO 10
  89. Re:Star Wars by Lectoid · · Score: 1

    Fuckin' A

    --
    Is it just me, or do you hate it when people say "Is it just me..."?
  90. Re:Star Wars by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Blasters make more gory fights.

    Phasers just makes the targets disappear.

    use blasters if you need to leave a mess for someone, Phasers if you don't want anyone knowing what you did.

    --
    Be seeing you...