Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs Recommends Android For Fans of Porn

hansamurai writes "After being asked about the App Store's recent ban on 'sexy apps,' Steve Jobs responded, 'We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone. Folks who want porn can buy an Android phone. You know, there's a porn store for Android, you can download nothing but porn. You can download porn, your kids can download porn. That's a place we don't want to go, so we're not going to go there.' Apps such as Playboy's and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition are still available on the App Store, however, as they come from 'more reputable companies.'"

127 of 909 comments (clear)

  1. So does he own any android phones? by hansraj · · Score: 5, Funny

    Or he only watches "reputable porn"?

    1. Re:So does he own any android phones? by stackOVFL · · Score: 3, Funny

      No app for that? Guess we need to wait for the iPorn? Or is that iPad? I'm so confused

    2. Re:So does he own any android phones? by McGruber · · Score: 2, Funny

      No app for that? Guess we need to wait for the iPorn? Or is that iPad?

      iSpank

  2. In other news... by maugle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sales of Android phones increased 1000%.

    1. Re:In other news... by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Informative

      For about ten minutes before customers realized that they could still get porn using Safari and that iTunes gladly lets them transfer their porn videos to the iPhone.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    2. Re:In other news... by exabrial · · Score: 4, Funny

      Is there porn on the itunes store? Or are you using an illegal method to transfer licensed content to a playback medium not covered by the origanal license?

    3. Re:In other news... by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

          I was going to say, that's the best marketing the Android could have hoped for. "It does everything ours does *AND* can do porn." The adult industries have been a driving force for centuries, and Apple making a pseudo-clean environment isn't going to change that at all.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    4. Re:In other news... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know, we joke about it, but whatever the porn industry backs usually ends up being the winner in format wars.

      Blu Ray, VHS...

      The only favour you're doing is helping droids, not iPhone customers.

    5. Re:In other news... by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ripping a DVD for your own use is legal. DECRYPTING it with an unauthorized backup tool is not thanks to the DMCA, but the vast majority of porn DVD's have no copy protection, in which case the DMCA doesn't come into play.

      Not to mention that there are sites that already cater to this. www.videobox.com for example even has an "iPod" option on their video downloads that downloads a MPEG4 file already optimized for placeback on an iPod, that will import straight into iTunes. Completely legal, and works fine.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    6. Re:In other news... by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, as GP says, you are using an illegal method to transfer licensed content to a playback medium not covered by the original license.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For about ten minutes before customers realized that they could still get porn using Safari...

      Cool, I'll just load up RedTube in iPhone Safari here and.... look at the wonderful porn provided by the lack of Flash.

    8. Re:In other news... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not only is the actual availability of porn a potential driving force, Apple has just shattered their facade of being a "cool, forward thinking company".

      As I said in another comment, their core market is young, rich, art/media types. Apple have far less of a need than many to worry about the older, more conservative buyers. Using porn as the bogeyman just isn't going to fly with young people - trying to drag an opponent's name through the mud by associating it with something that plenty of people now consider harmless just makes Apple look out of touch.

    9. Re:In other news... by Applekid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I was going to say, that's the best marketing the Android could have hoped for. "It does everything ours does *AND* can do porn." The adult industries have been a driving force for centuries, and Apple making a pseudo-clean environment isn't going to change that at all.

      Perhaps. But Jobs was definitely trying to inspire some FUD (in this case, fear) against the Android when he said "You can download porn, your kids can download porn..."

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    10. Re:In other news... by gstoddart · · Score: 2, Funny

      For about ten minutes before customers realized that they could still get porn using Safari and that iTunes gladly lets them transfer their porn videos to the iPhone.

      You know, being among that (apparently small) group of people who only use my phone for phone calls ... I am completely baffled as to why anyone would want porn on their phone. I just can't imagine where I'd be that porn on my phone would be what I most needed.

      Then again, I don't text, surf the web, or any of half a dozen things with my cell phone that everyone else seems to want to do. So, I'm likely missing the point. :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    11. Re:In other news... by GreenEnvy22 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      True for VHS, but initially the adult industry backed HD-DVD, not bluray,and bluray still won.

    12. Re:In other news... by gbjbaanb · · Score: 3, Funny

      But Jobs was definitely trying to inspire some FUD (in this case, fear) against the Android when he said "You can download porn, your kids can download porn..."

      Good job he didn't mention the Kin, then you can download porn *of* your kids.

    13. Re:In other news... by MMInterface · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Unfortunately most of the streaming porn that people watch on their browsers is in Flash. The same problem exists with streaming sites that play for foreign dramas. Even if HTML5 really catches on it will generally be for mainstream content. The iTunes thing is kind of a pain. Downloaded videos are rarely in a format that iTunes will recognize. You have to convert your whole library to their format which is time consuming. Porn is more of a spontaneous activity. If your not in the mood to watch it immediately you aren't going to be in the mood to convert your porn files to an iPad friendly format.

    14. Re:In other news... by JWSmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, the caves that had the women with boobies were probably the most popular ones.

          There was an interesting piece on the History Channel (I believe) about the brothels of Pompeii.

          An awful lot of our history has been determined by either sex or driven because of sex. Occasionally people try to deny this, but in the end it is what drives humanity. Well, humanity is a bit narrow minded, it's what has driven any organism that thrives. Without these instinctual urges, an organism would be a dead end on their evolutionary path.

          Someone will probably want to go all religious on this, so let me beat them to the punch.

      God said to them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the earth...

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  3. Like the sound of this by DrLang21 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Suddenly I really like Android.

    --
    I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    1. Re:Like the sound of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you happy to see me or is that an Android phone in your pocket?

    2. Re:Like the sound of this by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Funny

      I prefer deep dicking some tight wet pussy over but I guess porn phone is ok for losers like you that sit home and jack off.

      That is the point! If it is on your phone, you don't have to sit at home and jack off. You can jack off on the go!

  4. Stupid argument by assantisz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And iPhone users (including children) don't have access to porn? Last time I checked (guilty as charged!) there are iPhone specific streaming sites for porn. Instead of going to the app store all they have to open up Safari and google for the goodies.

  5. Is it my imagination? by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is it my imagination, or is Steve being more douchey than usual?

    1. Re:Is it my imagination? by Spatial · · Score: 5, Funny

      A momentary fluctuation in the reality distortion field.

    2. Re:Is it my imagination? by Surt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's your imagination. Specifically, you were imagining that he was not at least this douchey all along.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:Is it my imagination? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is it my imagination, or is Steve being more douchey than usual?

      No, it's not just your imagination.

  6. He missed the opportunity for a real ice-burn... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    He is really being a dick there. There's a "porn store" for the iPhone as well, called "Mobile Safari". If anything, the prices are lower.

    However, if he is going to be an asshole he should have gone just a little further... Something to the effect of "And the inferior multitouch support won't bother you nearly as much if you are always using your phone one-handed..."

  7. Any other recommendations, Steve? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Funny

    Steve, buddy! Thanks for the recommendations, I'm a huge fan of pr0n. Could you also recommend pr0n-friendly restaurants, hotels, bakeries etc?

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Any other recommendations, Steve? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Informative

      Could you also recommend pr0n-friendly restaurants, hotels, bakeries etc?

      Bakeries you say?

      (Jobs is right! I found this using Google.)

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    2. Re:Any other recommendations, Steve? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 4, Funny

      Last time I tried to buy an erotic cake, Jean Luc Picard tried to sell me a cake of a woman going to the bathroom. So, no.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
  8. Sure Steve by jDeepbeep · · Score: 3, Informative

    As if applications are the only porn vector. Let's get rid of Safari too while we're at it.

    --
    Reply to That ||
    1. Re:Sure Steve by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      is is absolutely absurd. Apple has zero interest in blocking what you can view in Safari (or Firefox or whatever you browse with). This is solely about the apps in the App Store. Nothing more.

      You're looking at it wrong. You see, WHY is this about the App Store? Because Apple has enough leverage here that they can be the only source of applications here, which means that they can skim a bit of profit off of every app sold that works on the iPhone.

      They don't have that leverage in the general web yet, but you can bet they'd like to, and they've already proven what they're willing to do with that leverage. If for example, there were sufficient iPhone users out there, it wouldn't be too much of a strech for Apple to move their platform to an opt-in method. You go to sites on a segregated Apple internet, and the sites there pay Apple for their presence there. Facebook coughs up a bit of money each month or they can't be accessed by iPhone users. Essentially, the same type of lock-in as with the app store.

      The reason there is simple: profit motive. They don't currently have the ability to do this from a PR standpoint at the moment, but their past behavior has removed any doubts from my mind that they would if they could.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  9. I don't need by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't need Apple to act as a morality police for what I do with something I own.

    1. Re:I don't need by SoupGuru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly.

      I'll get an iPhone if I want Jobs dictating what I get according to his tastes. Since I don't, I got a Droid and I can get (or not get) what I want.

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    2. Re:I don't need by ircmaxell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly... I love the "Think of the children" line that he uses. As if children should even be using smart phones if there exists content that they shouldn't see. Well played straw-man argument Jobs... Well played...

      But I guess Apple want's to parent your kids for you too. New from Apple, the iDad! Never again will you need to know anything about your child's life, simply let the iDad do it for you!

      --
      If a man isn't willing to take some risk for his opinions, either his opinions are no good or he's no good
    3. Re:I don't need by Nerdfest · · Score: 5, Informative

      Actually, they just rejected a reportedly extremely nice iPad application that taught kids how to program, called "Scratch", based on Alan Kay's ideas from ages ago. It looks like a fantastic idea, but aparently violates their terms and condition, as the kids can 'create programs'. They're not really thinking of the children.

    4. Re:I don't need by mweather · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realise that Walmart's censorship practices influence the content of music,movies, and video games right? You just gave an extremely good example of why companies who control a huge chunk of a given market acting as moral police is a bad thing.

    5. Re:I don't need by fm6 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Especially when the chief censor is this guy:

      http://www.9to5mac.com/steve-jobs-hacks-phones-234556455

      But really, this isn't about censorship. This is about branding. Because Apple doesn't sell technology any more, they sell an image. And that image doesn't have room for stroke facilitation software.

    6. Re:I don't need by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Then buy an Android phone. Thats exactly what jobs just told you you should do.

      That's what I did. This doesn't mean that I shouldn't call Steve a dick when he's acting like one.

    7. Re:I don't need by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nobody gives a damn really that Apple doesn't sell porn. Google doesn't sell porn themselves either. What they care about is that Apple a) doesn't sell porn and b) has made it so that they are the ONLY source of apps on the platform. Essentially resulting in the situation that there simply is no legitimate way to get adult-themed applications on the phone - even if you want them. Web based, sure. Videos you transfer, sure. But apps? Nope. You're SOL.

      Nobody cares that Wal-mart does sell porn because the smut shop down the street is a perfectly fine alternate source. HOWEVER, if Wal-mart was legislated to be the absolute only source where one could legally buy physical goods, then people would have a much more valid concern if they refused to sell porn (or chocolate, or ammo, or purple footballs, or any other good which people want but are being purposefully prevented from accessing on the simple whim of a company).

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:I don't need by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Informative

      They also censor artists who criticize Walmart.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    9. Re:I don't need by feranick · · Score: 2

      IPhone owners gave away that right long ago. You never really own an iPhone, or a Mac. Apple knows what is best for you, because it thinks a user is unable to make adult decisions.

  10. Okay by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Steve Jobs responded, "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone. Folks who want porn can buy an Android phone. "

    Well, I don't see that porn is particularly harmful to children, especially compared to the violence in media and games sold on the iPhone, so I don't know why one would be a moral imperative and the other would not. I actually think this is marketing, designed to appeal to parents who want their kids kept safe from the evils of... umm... boobies?

    But that's okay. If he's recommending an Android phone, I'll probably take him up on it when I purchase a smartphone.

    1. Re:Okay by characterZer0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wanting to prevent your children from seeing pornography and wanting to prevent your children from seeing breasts are two completely different things.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
    2. Re:Okay by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nipples are far worse than depictions of brutal murder. Don't argue with the MPAA.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    3. Re:Okay by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You are telling me that a large percentage of the population find this pornographic? I find that very hard to believe. Most people understand that the difference between mere nudity and pornographic nudity is context.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:Okay by characterZer0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Every time there is an article related to pornography there are dozens of posts along the lines of "ZOMG BOOBIES!!!" attempting to portray those who want to block pornography as fragile people who think the sight of female breasts will ruin children.

      There are perfectly reasonable people who have no problem with children seeing Venus de Milo, breastfeeding mothers, or people sunbathing nude, but want to prevent children from seeing pornography.

      --
      Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  11. so... He's saying... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apple products are for girly men... Or not.

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:so... He's saying... by ErkDemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, an iPhone/iPad isn't exactly the most macho-looking bit of hi-technology, is it?

      Every time I see a woman carrying an iPhone, it seemed to be bulked up with big chunky covers and accessories, presumably because otherwise it just looks too girlie.

      If you look at it, and track back the design vocabulary of the back and the rim and the little round button, the design ethos is essentially classic ladies jewelery. The silver-backed iPod Touch looks like what you'd expect a Chanel silver-backed ladies' hairbrush to look like with the bristles removed.

      It's all a bit Paris Hilton.

  12. You're all missing the point by Anonymusing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is marketing-speak for "We're going to be opening the Apple Porn Store very soon. You think the rigid curves of our multi-touch sensors are cool? You ain't seen nothing. Wait for Steve Jobs to say, 'And one more thing.'"

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  13. Smart move. by beckett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jobs simultaneously drags the android through the mud while claiming a moral high ground for the iphone. what's Google going to do? Trying to defend pornography will be an uphill battle going to a place "where we don't want to go".

    nicely played.

    1. Re:Smart move. by SoupGuru · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right... there's no way Google could ever come out looking like a good guy.

      "We let our users choose what to download."

      Hmmm...

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    2. Re:Smart move. by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Jobs simultaneously drags the android through the mud while claiming a moral high ground for the iphone. what's Google going to do? Trying to defend pornography will be an uphill battle going to a place "where we don't want to go".

      I dunno... In Google's shoes, I'd respond to this with a one (and a half) sentence press release, something to the effect of "44% of all internet searches look for porn, and 97% of all households have searched for porn-related terms more than once. Android - For people who value freedom"

    3. Re:Smart move. by copponex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I guess Sergey could say he remembers what it was like being under the thumb of a hopeless totalitarian dickhole from his time living in Soviet Era Russia. So, if you want the same experience of someone else deciding what you can and cannot have access to, shackle yourself to an iPhone.

      (By the way, Steve Jobs is the same guy who denied paternity while his daughter and former girlfriend lived on welfare. I don't think he has any solid footing on the moral high ground.)

    4. Re:Smart move. by flitty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Google's Response:

      The iPhone. You know, for kids!

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    5. Re:Smart move. by QuasiEvil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple, you don't answer the porn charge directly. You instead talk about how Android is about user choice and user freedom, rather than what putzfuck Jobs decrees "acceptable" for you to use.

    6. Re:Smart move. by MoonBuggy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends who you're marketing to. The pro-porn stance might not win you a majority in the overall population, but Apple may well have shot themselves in the foot when it comes to their most loyal customers.

      Sure, smartphones are heading for the mainstream now, but the core audience (probably even more so for the iPhone than most others) is young, affluent, media-minded types. That just happens to intersect almost exactly with the segment of the population who are likely to be particularly liberal and progressively minded, the ones who are quite comfortable with sex.

      Banning the apps was one thing, but actively using the availability of porn as a negative against Android sounds like something from the 1950s. All this has done is made me think of Jobs as old and out of touch.

    7. Re:Smart move. by Tom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (By the way, Steve Jobs is the same guy who denied paternity while his daughter and former girlfriend lived on welfare. I don't think he has any solid footing on the moral high ground.)

      He later acknowledge, and this was in the late 70s. I don't know which world you live in, but the one around here has this thing called "change", and sometimes it applies to the minds of people as much as to the physical reality.

      Casting doubts on the morality of someone for something that happened 30+ years ago is just stupid. Talk to us again if you can find a case like that from this millenium.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  14. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by binarylarry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think it's better worded like this:

    'After being asked about the App Store's recent ban on "freedom to use your property as you see fit," Steve Jobs responded, "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep freedom away from the iPhone. Folks who want freedom can buy an Android phone. You know, there's a lot of freedom for Android, you can use it anyway you want to, you paid for the hardware, it's yours. You can download porn, your kids can download porn, it's totally free and up to you to do what you want. That's a place we don't want to go, so we're not going to go there." Apps such as Playboy's and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition are still available on the App Store, however, as they come from "more reputable companies."'

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  15. You have to wonder... by Third+Position · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You know, there's a porn store for Android, you can download nothing but porn. You can download porn, your kids can download porn.

    How does he know?

    --
    American Third Position
    Finally, a real choice!
    1. Re:You have to wonder... by viking099 · · Score: 2, Funny

      He's got this friend, see, who never thought it would happen to him.

      It all began in line at the Apple store, and a warm hand brushed the back of his neck, and whispered, "You might like the way I look on that iPhone, but with your Android phone, you get it all, even the parts where iTouch myself."

  16. let me fix that..... by initdeep · · Score: 5, Insightful

    After being asked about the App Store's recent ban on "sexy apps," Steve Jobs responded, "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn out of the app store to keep the moronic soccer moms off our ass. Folks who want porn can just use safari and browse to it like a normal person. You know, there's plenty of porn available on the iPhone, and plenty of gay porn hookup apps that soccer moms won't even notice. You can download porn via the browser, or any number of "respectable" apps from companies that make us a lot of money like Playboy and Sports Illustrated , your kids can download porn on their iPhones faster than we can attempt to block it, so we just come up with some lame ass story for the soccer mom's and they buy it because they are fucking pathetically stupid. That's a place we don't want to go, blocking safari, because we know kids will find their porn via browser anyway, so we're not going to go there."

  17. Getting scary by nlawalker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone."

    Apple's only moral responsibility is to let their users do whatever they feel like, and they have failed.

    The "Apple cult" image tossed around as a joke and an insult is becoming more and more true every day. You can't simply buy a device from Apple - you have to buy their device, their software, their platform, and their tastes, desires and morals too, and once you do, you can't separate any of them. This isn't vendor lock-in, it's religion.

    1. Re:Getting scary by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Maximizing profit" is not a moral responsability under any minimally sensible definition of "moral".

    2. Re:Getting scary by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have decided to not appeal to fringe geeks and nerds but to instead appeal to the affluent mass market in order to meet their moral responsibility. That moral mass market would prefer if "porn" was not readily available on their consumer electronic devices.

      I hate to hit you with this, but the overwhelming majority of the population, both male and female, consume porn to one degree or another, and it is the "moral" minority who consume it more voraciously than normal, healthy people who don't hold fucked up bronze age beliefs that sex is bad. (Amusingly, online porn purchases slightly decrease on Sundays.) The market Apple is appealing to isn't moral, it's just hypocritical, not unlike the stridently anti-gay politicians who frequently turn out to be gay themselves.

      The majority may claim to be above porn, but this is the same majority who also claim to be above masturbation, contrary to every reputable study ever conducted, which finds that non-masturbators are a tiny minority, especially among men.

      _YOU_ may not like that but Apple's shareholders, to whom Apple answers, likes it quite a bit.

      Sounds like you like it. I rather expect that most of Apple's shareholders will like anything that increases their profits. If that happens to be Steve Jobs' messiah complex, so be it. If, on the other hand, they thought there was a good way to monetize the iPhone's use to tap into the multi-billion-dollar porn market without hurting existing iPhone sales, then it would be Apple's moral responsibility -- your words, not mine -- to devote considerable resources to making sure that fisting videos were available with the tap of a finger, now wouldn't it?

      But that's how morality goes, isn't it? Any time you hear someone talking loudly about it, you can bet you're dealing with a hypocrite.

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
  18. Sony Recommends VHS For Fans of Porn by SirWhoopass · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't Sony pretty much take the exact same stance with their Betamax format? How did that work out for them?

  19. The Chinese Apple. by BlueKitties · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Apple has a moral responsibility to provide only high quality apps, and sees that it is necessary to forbid anyone from using their iPhone if they do not abide by their rules; This includes banning porn, and politically sensitive matters. China has a moral responsibility to provide only the highest quality websites, and sees that it is necessary to forbid anyone from using their Internet if they do not abide by their rules; This includes banning porn, and politically sensitive matters.

    --
    "Sorrow is better than laughter, for by sadness of face the heart is made glad." [Ecclesiastes 7:3]
  20. Every Time Jobs Speaks by SplicerNYC · · Score: 2, Funny

    I end up liking Bill Gates that much more.

    1. Re:Every Time Jobs Speaks by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry to disappoint you, but...

      ENSURING HIGH QUALITY PRODUCTS

      In addition to designing what the Marketplace is and how it works, we’ve also focused on what users expect of the content they find and have built and operate a certification process that every application and game goes through to meet these customer expectations.

      Customers reasonably expect the applications and games they find:
      - install and run correctly,
      - use device resources efficiently
      - are not malware compromising their identity or that of their friends family and colleagues
      transparently ask and inform users what personal information the application is accessing
      - are legal to own and use in their country of residence, and
      - are of generally good taste excluding pornography, hateful/inflammatory speech, and gratuitous violence.

      So cross your fingers for Android.

  21. Re:But Apple does not provide them by mwvdlee · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Are those android porn stores owned by Google?
    Personally I wouldn't care if they did, but somehow I doubt they do.

    --
    Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  22. Re:American pornophobia by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know about anyone else, but my primary fear is that my kids would see it and tell one of their friends at school about it. This then gets overheard by a parent with a huge stick up their ass who goes and tells anyone she can find that I'm letting my children watch porn, and before I know it I'm on the sex offender registry and my kids have a new family because this whole country always has a huge kneejerk overreaction whenever sex and children are mentioned in the same paragraph.

    In short, it's not that I don't think my kids could handle porn, it's that everyone else couldn't handle the idea that my kids were exposed to porn.

  23. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone

    I wish some people would take some responsibility and stop buying Apple products because they support the immoral values of billionaires. Stooping to popular opinion and Fandom usually, at the most has led to mediocrity, and sometimes lynch mobs. If Steve Jobs thinks that sex is immoral then I hope he doesn't engage in it himself.

  24. Re:But Apple does not provide them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope. Google's Market does not allow porn. Steve is just being an asshole because you can go download and install Android apps from wherever. And somehow the worst kind of app is porn. Not, I dunno, malicious apps that steal your passwords.

    The anti-porn rhetoric from the head of a politically liberal, gay-friendly company is pretty weird, to say the least.

  25. In other news.... by sanermind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sony Betamax recommends VHS if you're a fan of porn.

    --

    ---
    the pen is mightier than the sword, the sword is mightier than the court, the court is mightier than the pen.
  26. Wrong thinking by wonkavader · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He's not going to get techies this way.

    But he's not going to lose the iPhone-is-neato customers, and he's not going to lose the if Apple made a toilet I'd buy it crowd. Those groups either don't care that they're restricted, don't know they're restricted, or actually want to be restricted.

    He's saying this for consumption by the media. It's a nice buzz-bit. "Android is for porn." The media will repeat it because it's pithy and uses a titillating word. And the folks who have no clue about restrictions will repeat this to themselves when they go to buy a phone. Wives will insist that husbands buy iPhones for themselves and for the kids.

    This is not Jobs being stupid. This is both genius and an indication that Jobs is very, very afraid. His control-everything system depends on him being the master of really the only very good phone/tablet system. There's another system and pretty soon it'll be good enough to make his look less revolutionary. He needs another way to keep his silo full.

  27. Re:Walmart by e2d2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's a moot point anyway. Because the iPhone _does_ allow porn. Playboy is porn right? Safari can view porn right? So he's basically full of shit claiming some moral high ground. It's a joke and that's what we're laughing at. So I'll get off your lawn, if you come and join the fun.

  28. Re:Store by mweather · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple is simply saying they will not sell apps that contain porn.

    Unless the porn comes from a reputable company like Playboy. As a parent, knowing that my child is getting his porn from reputable companies takes a lot off my mind.

  29. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, the argument and merits boil down to this: You may choose between Bowdlerized digital lifestyle from Apple, or a direct pipeline into the next-generation of Total Information Awareness from Google?

    Try and get a Google account without submitting a verifiable mobile number. Combine the use of that account with any phone running Google Maps and Search. Now, multiply that potential by an order of magnitude, when you operate a phone stack that is completely designed and built by Google. Correlate your location and your content and your identity?

    I can look at REAL tits, thanks.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  30. Re:Then jailbreak it. by saider · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's also helpful to tell people why you won't buy one when you have the opportunity.

    You: "Ya know mom, I wouldn't get the iPhone. They prevent you from doing things you want to do with your hardware."

    Mom: "Like what?"

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
  31. Re:But Apple does not provide them by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Which is yet another argument for Android -- you can install apps any way you want, including from any app store you want. There's nothing stopping Apple from opening their own android app store.

    But it does show how moronic these measures are. I mean, you don't see Apple so much as installing a content filter on their mobile Safari, do you?

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  32. Re:He missed the opportunity for a real ice-burn.. by DeBaas · · Score: 4, Funny

    He is really being a dick there. There's a "porn store" for the iPhone as well, called "Mobile Safari". If anything, the prices are lower.

    He's got balls though, if he think he can be a bigger dick than those in the porn business

    --
    ---
  33. Re:Walmart by jd142 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hooray! I can bitch and moan then. Censorship is one of the many reasons I don't go to wal-mart. They won't sell Cosmo but they will sell you a gun. They censor their music. They break unions. They treat their employees like crap.

    Thanks for the invitation to complain. I didn't know you could do that on the internet.

  34. He really stepped it up this time. by jwietelmann · · Score: 4, Funny
    This rhetoric is really kicking it up a notch. We're getting into really cynical propaganda territory here.

    Buy our iPhone! Unless you're one of those porn-addicted Android users. I certainly welcome competition, and our competitors are doing a great job of fulfilling that niche market of phones for porn addicts. So if you're proud of being addicted to porn, show everyone just how much you mean it by purchasing my competitor's fine Android product and taking it with you everywhere. Android: There's no better way to tell the world "I'd rather be watching porn!"

    1. Re:He really stepped it up this time. by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Android is scaring the crap out of him If I was running Apple, it would terrify me. Of course, with hundreds of millions of dollars in my bank account, I could probably still sleep at night.

  35. Re:But Apple does not provide them by Eunuchswear · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jobs didn't say "Apple won't sell porn" he said "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone". He's mad.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  36. The Internet has taught us the power of two things by gimmebeer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Video games and porn. Steve has undermined half of the reason the internet exists. Not a good move there buddy.

  37. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Either way you're going to give up a ton of personal info.

    To get an iPhone you'll need an account with the mobile provider, meaning you'll need to give up your contact info as well as a lot of financial and credit information. This would be enough information to track you down and glean tons info about you.

    Plus the iPhone uses a lot of google services and even if they switch away due to Android, Yahoo or whatever replacement is chosen will collect and track you in the same fashion.

    What are you trying to hide anyway? ;)

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  38. Re:American pornophobia by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Parents are not ALLOWED to parent their children in America. That's the State's job. (Somewhere, Mussolini is laughing.)

    Two anecdotal incidents:

    1. My son is wont to run off without looking or thinking if he does not get what he wants (Mom tends to give in to irrational desires, me: far less so). I stopped him from trying to run into highway traffic while he was having one of his fits because he did not want shoes. Later, his mother called police because there was a small abrasion on his stomach. (I held him around the abdomen.) I was arrested, jailed for felony assault of a minor, and eventually pled guilty to disorderly conduct -- not because I was fearful of facing the charge -- but because it was necessary that the case be closed so I could continue to parent my kids: the State had to give me a trial within 90 days of pressing charges, but they could sit on those charges for five years, keeping the case open. Besides, disorderly conduct in WA essentially is anything that might make someone assault you -- perhaps someone might think I was trying to kidnap him.

    2. My daughter wanted to meet a much older person she was chatting with online. I though it a perfect chance to teach how to meet strangers, that might become friends, even as I was wary. I set ground rules: I come along, we meet in a very public restaurant for lunch, we go our separate ways, we do not disclose where we live, we make sure we are not followed after. I was wary about this person's intentions but figured a blanket veto would just encourage a secret meeting which could be far more dangerous. I drilled her on "stranger safety" before the meeting and debriefed her after. This was deemed by a mental health professional as a "poor choice" and that the veto would be better.

    3. A friend of my daughters recounted how some female classmates wanted her to be "in" on their plan. They were upset at how much homework a male teach was assigning and were to accuse, en masse, that he sexually abused them, figuring their numbers would bolster the believability of the allegation.

    The bottom line is that effective parenting can get one jailed these days. And, I know many parents who outright fear their kids.

    --
    In Liberty, Rene
  39. Re:American pornophobia by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's a valid fear. I know someone who asked her father about sex she was about 6 or 7. Her father, not being ashamed of the biological process, gave her a frank and straightforward explanation. Being a child, she then told some of her classmates about it and next thing you know: the parents were getting a visit from CPS.

    --
    It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  40. Re:He missed the opportunity for a real ice-burn.. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The porn guys are pikers: They pay to screw their employees. My customers pay me to screw them."

    Yours in manifest serenity, S. Jobs

  41. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by sbeckstead · · Score: 2, Informative

    The point being that more iPhone stories means more ads being served.

    There fixed that for you!

  42. Wow by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Just when you thought the apple marketing machine couldn't get any more sanctimonious, Jobs goes and says something like this.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  43. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by vell0cet · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually... it's more like saying that the person who built your house (that YOU own) says that he doesn't want OJ Simpson in the house that YOU own. And actively stops you from having him as a guest.

    Your analogy is ludicrous. How would you explain away not having Flash functionality?

  44. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by Razalhague · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple sells the same kind of freedom as Microsoft.

  45. What really grinds my gears by killmenow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is the extreme hypocrisy of allowing SI swimsuit and Playboy apps but saying "We don't allow porn."

    Look, it is my well educated opinion that Playboy, soft-core BS, swimsuit calendars/photoshoots, and basically the societal desire to objectify women through "moral" sexualizations causes MORE harm than XXX hard core pornography does. Why? Because it's insidious and sends terrible messages to people and messes with their psyches. It's OK to objectify and look at women sexually as long AS LONG AS THERE'S NO SEX INVOLVED?! But, wait, isn't that the point? Oh, no, it's better to get guys hot and bothered with teases and pics of scantily clad women everywhere and then tell them "SEX IS BAD!!!" than it is to show them videos of ACTUAL SEX and saying, "Meh, it's just sex." REALLY?? This is the moral stance??? It's OK to have Janet Jackson sing about sexual topics, dress sluttily and grind her body against a man in a mock sexual ritual but "HOLY MOTHER OF GOD!!! 0.5 SECONDS OF TIT JUST FLASHED ACROSS MY TV SCREEN!!!" That messes with people's heads and gives them warped ideas about sexuality and women.

    So Steve Jobs can keep his "moral" porn and I'll hang on to the stuff that doesn't pander to me and send me mixed messages about what's right and wrong, what's ok and what's dirty, and enjoy the wisdom of knowing IT'S ALL ABOUT SEX without pretending "sex but not sex" is somehow better than just sex without all the BS.

  46. Its all about money by JustNiz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >> Playboy's and the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition are still available on the App Store, however, as they come from 'more reputable companies

    Ahh so kids seeing "reputable" porn is OK then ehh Steve? ... Obviously this actually has nothing to do with porn and all to do with licencing revenue.

  47. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to disagree. I'm far from a Microsoft fan, but they've never prevented me from running software on their products because they disagreed with the content or subject matter.

    They don't care what you're doing, as long as you're doing it on their platforms. (Although I've never owned a Zune or even seen one in person).

    Apple, on the other hand, wants to completely control what you think and do when using their products.

    It's comical but Apple's trying to make sure 2010 and beyond will be like 1984.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  48. Re:But Apple does not provide them by TheRealSync · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The anti-porn rhetoric from the head of a politically liberal, gay-friendly company is pretty weird, to say the least.

    What has "gay-friendly" got to do with it?

    --
    -- A good compromise leaves everyone mad. --Calvin and Hobbes
  49. That's not moral by hellfire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't believe any sane person believes that maximizing shareholder profits at the expense of consumer freedom and choice is a moral thing. And no, Wall Street is not sane.

    Apple has a financial responsibility to it's shareholders, not a moral one. If the law allowed companies to put babies on spikes and make an obscene amount of profit from doing so, any company would do it. The amount of profit companies make these days is obscene. Naked people doing acts based on natural bodily functions to give each other pleasure is not obscene.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  50. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Speaking as somebody who isn't interested in living within Apple's Walled Garden or cashing in my privacy with Google, neither phrasing reads like anything but propaganda.

    You guys really should listen to yourselves. "Be free! Do as I say!"

  51. Reputable? by jslater25 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm pretty sure that my wife would have something to say about Playboy being considered 'reputable'.

  52. Re:Walmart by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do not like to be told what I can buy and what not. And I do not shop as Walmart as I do not shop as Aldi or any other discounter which treats their personnel badly. But there is a big difference between Walmart and Apple. Walmart is a store, and I can go to any other store I want when the products from Walmart are not satisfactory. But when I have an iPhone, I can only go to Apple to buy apps. And with iTunes I can only shop at iTunes-Music-Store. This is like Ford having a discounter and you can only drive to the Ford-discounter with your new vehicle, but not to Walmart or any street market.

  53. Jobs redefines "responsibility" by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Steve Jobs responded, "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone."

    No you don't. You have a fiduciary responsibility to your shareholders to sell as many iPhones as possible. You are not in the morality business.

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    1. Re:Jobs redefines "responsibility" by snowwrestler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He obviously thinks that they can sell more phones by employing a marketing message built around morals. This post nailed it.

      --
      Build a man a fire, he's warm for one night. Set him on fire, and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Jobs redefines "responsibility" by RazorSharp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So your claim is that businessmen have no moral responsibility? That their fiduciary responsibility trumps whatever moral responsibilities one may have? I don't think so. We're all people regardless of where we work.

      I'm not saying that moral responsibility is relevant to pornography on the iPhone, it may or may not be; but your statement is eerily similar to the excuses made by executives who have abused monopoly power, sold faulty or poisonous products, cheated their employees, cheated the IRS, and outright lied. Being involved in a business venture doesn't exempt one from their moral responsibilities.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  54. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by Eunuchswear · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So get yourself a fucking Nokia already.

    You do know that Apple and Google aren't the only game in town.

    In the phone market they aren't even the biggest.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  55. Fascism by Doomstalk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it is safe to say, without even a hint of hyperbole, that Steve Jobs is a fascist. As soon as censorship becomes a "moral responsibility", something has gone deeply wrong. Supporting Apple is supporting the death of the creativity and freedom that the company likes to pretend it nurtures. Think too different, and your work will be dragged out in the middle of the night and shot.

  56. The real news... by VTI9600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Apple actually acknowledged that Android exists! I thought that was a big no-no

  57. erotic bakery by viridari · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I recommend avoiding the cream filled donuts.

  58. Re:But Apple does not provide them by jbezorg · · Score: 2

    But Apple does not provide them.

    Not true. They provide "reputable" porn. Which, combined with Jobs justification, is like claiming you're a vegan and still eating seafood.

    --
    I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
  59. Re:But Apple does not provide them by Comboman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anti-porn is one of the few things that ultra-liberals ("objectifies women") and ultra-conservatives ("makes Jesus cry") can agree on.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  60. So, the Apple's iPhone Ad.. by microbee · · Score: 2, Informative

    "Just about anything, there is an app for that" is really a lie.

  61. Re:But Apple does not provide them by colesw · · Score: 2, Funny

    Haven't you heard? Only gay people watch pornography!

  62. Wow, a company with morals by theomegapointer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Apple has always done things there own way. They don't have to sit there and try to respond to "the market" wether they think the market wants porn or not. They are leaders and innovators and create their own markets. They probably realize that porn is as pernicious and vicious as cocaine in ruining peoples lives. For you that like to sit there and jerk off to your computer all day you will realize this one day. Apple is not perfect. In fact I'm pretty pissed off that I had to reinstall OS X twice in the last 6 months because my system completely seized up - but I appreciate them taking a moral stand. They are in business to make money like everyone else, but they seem to want to help elevate society, not facilitate it's decline into the gutter. Porn is destructive and has no value to humanity whatsoever. I invite anyone to seriously research the matter.

  63. Re:Ready Pitchforks! by MooseMuffin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is absurd. The only thing they are controlling is the apps on their store

    Oh, so I'm free to get my iphone porn apps form other stores then?

  64. He Seems to Forget.... by Symbha · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That the internet was built on porn.
    Apple has not learned their lesson from the years when they were irrelevant.

  65. Re:Also... Where is this market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Also... Where is this "porn market" for android?

    MiKandi

  66. Does anyone see a pattern here? by An+dochasac · · Score: 4, Funny

    No Pr0n:Betamax, Laserdisc, Afghanistan, iPad,
    Pr0n: VHS, DVD, Las Vegas, Google Android

    Thank's for the tip Mr. Jobs!

  67. Re:But Apple does not provide them by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2

    Jobs didn't say "Apple won't sell porn" he said "We do believe we have a moral responsibility to keep porn off the iPhone". He's mad.

    He is not mad. He is quite smart.He knows that you can get porn on the iphone. He knows that lots of people are doing it now.

    So you claim he's not mad, just a liar. You claim he doesn't believe he has a "moral responsibility" to keep porn off the iPhone.

    And if you think there's no porn in Ferraris...

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  68. Slashdot is out of touch with reality by jmcbain · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slashdot is seriously out of touch with reality regarding Apple. The company just posted yesterday their highest non-holiday profit quarter ever (90% year-over-year increase in profit). iPhone sales were up 130% year-over-year. AAPL stock is soaring right now This is all due to Apple's complete control over the iPhone. So does the lack of hardcore adult content hurt the iPhone sales? No, it does not. Steve Jobs is absolutely right.

    1. Re:Slashdot is out of touch with reality by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Slashdot is seriously out of touch with reality regarding Apple.

      So it is ok for Apple/Jobs to be self-righteous and sanctimonious, as long as they are profitable? What if they starting losing money, would you then find his words offensive? Perhaps some people find it offensive purely on the basis of it restricting your liberty with hardware you paid dearly for.

      What are you, a stockholder or just a tool?

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Slashdot is out of touch with reality by Rodyland · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you, a stockholder or just a tool?

      You seem to imply he can't be both.

  69. Re:Walmart by roju · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But Steve also physically forbids you from buying apps in other stores. This situation is only comparable to being able to walk to the porn store next door if in that scenario Steve has a hired thug standing outside it preventing you from shopping there.

  70. No, but he's a hypocritical fuck. by theolein · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Steve Job, today's "moral apostle" on the iPhone, is the same hypocritical fuck who fathered a girl and denied it, yet proclaims his moral superiority to the rest of us because of porn? Steve Jobs doesn't give a flying fuck about porn. It's just more pandering to the Disney crowd. There's nothing wrong with that, but it would be nice if he had the balls to admit it.

  71. Touch and gestures by Tetsujin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you zoom in real life with only 2 fingers?

    Well, if I "pinch" the boobs, they do move further away...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  72. Re:Um, Steve, a question by rwa2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The Android Market porn is actually pretty well hidden. Try the "Tic Tac Toe" app and click on one of the "X"'s three times.

    But really, Steve Jobs knows his market, and it is not computer geeks. Geeks know how to find porn, and save money by buying the best hardware they can for the price. Plus the non-geek market, is much, much bigger.

    Families are all too happy to throw money at problems if it saves them time trying to comparison shop. I know because I've started doing it myself, unfortunately :-/ But at least not when it comes to technology ... yet.

  73. Re:Walmart by whisper_jeff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Erm, excuse me??? Isn't the *ONLY* way to download an app onto a (non-jailbroken) iPhone via the App Store??? Or am I missing something?

    Yes. You are missing something. Web apps. I'll give you two excellent examples. Google Voice (m.google.com/voice) and Bejeweled (http://www.popcap.com/games/iphone/bejeweled). So, if you want to develop an app for the iPhone, you do not need to go through Apple - you can publish as a web app.