Slashdot Mirror


Outsourcing Unit To Be Set Up In Indian Jail

littlekorea writes "Indian outsourcing firm Radiant Info Systems has found yet another way to lower wages — hiring data entry clerks from a local prison. Some 200 inmates will be paid $2.20 a day to handle manual data entry tasks for Radiant's BPO deals in a pilot for the scheme. Radiant execs told the BBC that the deal will provide skills to inmates when they are released from prison. No doubt they would also be due for a pay raise." They're going to need to cut wages if they want to be competitive with the 100,000 US prisoners who work for 25 cents an hour.

249 comments

  1. Competitive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    $.25 an hour x 8 hours a day=$2 a day

    Seems fairly competitive to me...

    1. Re:Competitive... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      $.25 an hour x 8 hours a day=$2 a day ... Seems fairly competitive to me...

      I wonder if they can get "fired" for screwing up their data entry, or if they just get moved from the "entering banking data" group to the "entering climate change data" group?

    2. Re:Competitive... by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      FTFA:

      The outsourcing centre will handle banking information 24 hours a day

      Poster asks:

      I wonder if they can get "fired" for screwing up their data entry, or if they just get moved from the "entering banking data" group to the "entering climate change data" group?

      If they do it right, they'll be able to BUY their way out of jail.

      People will be breaking INTO jail to better do identity theft.

    3. Re:Competitive... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      Why stop on 8? Make it 16! They'll make a fortune. And they can make some extra collecting all the data they handle and selling it to their criminal contacts outside jail.

    4. Re:Competitive... by JohannesJ · · Score: 1

      They cant put the bad ones in Jail ,They're already there, so when they do badly, they make them Tech support for Top USA ISP's and Big financial businesses.

    5. Re:Competitive... by kraemate · · Score: 1

      Identity theft is only a real problem in civilized places.

      More seriously, i wonder how many of the prison inmates here in india are able to speak english. If people who went to english schools and have had 'accent-training' programs and what not speak so horribly, how can petty prisoners be expected to be fluent?

    6. Re:Competitive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah, so Radiant is providing the biz community with climate change data - no wonder there's so much bad data floating around in certain circles

      btw. is that old dude checking his pulse? yo, no soul = no pulse! stop checking for it!

    7. Re:Competitive... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

      Identity theft is only a real problem in civilized places.

      North American banks are outsourcing their tech to India. Excluding Florida and parts of Texas, Nevada, Utah and California, the US is still somewhat civilized.

      More seriously, i wonder how many of the prison inmates here in india are able to speak english. If people who went to english schools and have had 'accent-training' programs and what not speak so horribly, how can petty prisoners be expected to be fluent?

      Since when do you have to speak any language without an accent to work a keyboard? BTW, English is the second official language.

    8. Re:Competitive... by IICV · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they can get "fired" for screwing up their data entry, or if they just get moved from the "entering banking data" group to the "entering climate change data" group?

      That's what graduate students are for - sometimes, they'll actually pay you for the privilege!

    9. Re:Competitive... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we send all the unemploy to India's jail, would the economy become better ?

  2. Skills... by drc003 · · Score: 1

    "... Radiant execs told The BBC that the deal will provide skills to inmates when they are released from prison. No doubt they would also be due for a pay rise."

    Yeah, the skills to improve Radiant's bottom line.

    1. Re:Skills... by droopus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The feds have NO interest whatsoever in providing skill training, no matter what their propaganda tells you. At the FCI where I was, inmates typically slept till lunch, signed false pay sheets claiming 40 hours worked. They thought they were getting over, but it's actualy the feds, who can provide "proof" of "gainfully employed inmates."

      But it's a scam. The BOP/DOJ has a vested interest in the 75% recidivism rate...it keeps the beds full and the $30,000 a year per inmate flowing nicely. Most inmates sleep till lunch, play basketball or softball in the afternoon, and watch TV and gamble all night.

      Look, my unit had nine televisions (big flat screens, full cable, Netflix movies twice a week) and four toilets for 150 guys. Total in the facility? 1,800 inmates in regular population housed in 6 units, with a total of 48 toilets and 108 televisions. What's wrong with this picture?

      Skills training my ass. Try getting a job with nothing on your resume but "data entry and basic Office." And that's for the tech/UNICOR jobs! It's like a health club..once they have you, they want you to keep coming back. Again and again. No skills? You're probably going to reoffend.

      Step 3: Profit!

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    2. Re:Skills... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Look, my unit had nine televisions (big flat screens, full cable, Netflix movies twice a week) and four toilets for 150 guys. Total in the facility? 1,800 inmates in regular population housed in 6 units, with a total of 48 toilets and 108 televisions. What's wrong with this picture?

      Sounds like they had more than 2 TV's displaying each toilet to me. That's not exactly HBO (well, it is if you count 'Oz').

    3. Re:Skills... by drc003 · · Score: 1

      The point of my sarcastic post exactly but with all of the insight it lacked as well. I would mod your post if I hadn't already posted myself. Great points.

    4. Re:Skills... by causality · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The feds have NO interest whatsoever in providing skill training, no matter what their propaganda tells you. At the FCI where I was, inmates typically slept till lunch, signed false pay sheets claiming 40 hours worked. They thought they were getting over, but it's actualy the feds, who can provide "proof" of "gainfully employed inmates."

      But it's a scam. The BOP/DOJ has a vested interest in the 75% recidivism rate...it keeps the beds full and the $30,000 a year per inmate flowing nicely. Most inmates sleep till lunch, play basketball or softball in the afternoon, and watch TV and gamble all night.

      Look, my unit had nine televisions (big flat screens, full cable, Netflix movies twice a week) and four toilets for 150 guys. Total in the facility? 1,800 inmates in regular population housed in 6 units, with a total of 48 toilets and 108 televisions. What's wrong with this picture?

      Skills training my ass. Try getting a job with nothing on your resume but "data entry and basic Office." And that's for the tech/UNICOR jobs! It's like a health club..once they have you, they want you to keep coming back. Again and again. No skills? You're probably going to reoffend.

      Step 3: Profit!

      That's what happens when state and federal governments contract out such a basic thing as their prison systems. To the government and government-run prisons, prisoners are nothing but an expense so the fewer, the better. To the private companies, each prisoner represents profit so the more the merrier.

      Certainly I can understand the government buying items on the open market such as automobiles, ships, airplanes, office stationery, electricity, etc. I hardly expect them to mine their own ore, smelt it, forge it, and make their own products, to run their own paper mills, or maintain their own electrical grids. Yet a line does need to be drawn someplace because things like prisons are rightly an unwanted expense. I propose that the government can freely purchase any needed goods (including units of energy like kilowatt-hours) but must perform all services itself, carried out by individuals who are government employees.

      No one should have a vested interest in a high recidivism rate, particularly not when large sums of money are involved. It does not serve society's interests. Further, I bet they're fine with high recidivism until a crime happens to them. Any such entity with vested interests like this is a parasite that feeds off the failing of others. These parasites are state-sponsored.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    5. Re:Skills... by Tanktalus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one should have a vested interest in a high recidivism rate, particularly not when large sums of money are involved. It does not serve society's interests. Further, I bet they're fine with high recidivism until a crime happens to them. Any such entity with vested interests like this is a parasite that feeds off the failing of others. These parasites are state-sponsored.

      If the government was interested in a low recidivism rate, they would reward facilities for it. Look at averages for rates of return, and reward facilities that turn out better than that. As an example, if the average for a certain type of criminal is to have a 50% recidivism rate within 5 years, track the ex-prisoners, and give an actual cash award to the prison if they average 40% over 6 years. This opens the whole system back up to the private sector to resolve.

      There would also be room in this environment for penalties for significantly worse than average results, where "significantly worse" is something I'm not defining here. There would be other changes likely also required (such as the inability to turn down a prisoner for anything other than overcrowding issues, so they don't bias their population only with those they think won't reoffend in the first place). I'm sure that if lowering the recidivism rate was really on any elected official's radar, it could be solved without socialising the industry.

      There are some commons that I do think the government should not privatise. I also think that conflicts of interest need to be resolved (and, in the public sphere, I would generally also like to see appearances of conflicts of interest to be eliminated as well). However, I prefer to go for solutions with the smallest amount of delta to the status quo. Some people call that "conservative" (with a small "c"). I prefer to call it "the scientific method" - by reducing the delta to as small as possible to effect the change, we can be sure as to what we can attribute the change to, so others can replicate that success, or not duplicate that failure. Grand social experiments, I'm not so fond of. And, yes, it can be argued that privatising the prison industry was a grand social experiment. I wouldn't disagree. However, that's where the Americans are at the moment, so that's where you have to work from.

    6. Re:Skills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prisons are a great way to bypass the constitution and get some good old fashioned slave labor. Why bother paying for public services via a fair tax system when you can just keep increasing the penalties for, say, petty drug offenses? Rome was built by slaves, so can the US. If they try to change the system they can't vote before or after they leave so no problem there. Background checks will make sure they never get a decent job and will end up in prison and keep them full. Who needs illegal immegrants to cut the grass outside town hall when you can hit up the county jail?

    7. Re:Skills... by daem0n1x · · Score: 3, Insightful

      TV or toilet, who cares? The only difference is the direction of shit. With toilets, it goes in, with TVs, it comes out.

    8. Re:Skills... by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      prefer to go for solutions with the smallest amount of delta to the status quo. Some people call that "conservative" (with a small "c"). I prefer to call it "the scientific method" - by reducing the delta to as small as possible to effect the change, we can be sure as to what we can attribute the change to, so others can replicate that success, or not duplicate that failure. Grand social experiments, I'm not so fond of. And, yes, it can be argued that privatising the prison industry was a grand social experiment. I wouldn't disagree. However, that's where the Americans are at the moment, so that's where you have to work from.

      You've got some intriguing ideas, but the problem is that society is just too f'n complicated to run controlled experiments on. If recidivism is down in 5 years is that because of incentivising private prisons or was it because of some other minor change in law or demographics or judicial philosophy. If you're arguing for that status quo, well that's fine so long as you're ok with bank bailouts, oil spills, and substandard overpriced healthcare. If you want to change something, you have to account for the other part of the scientific method, that if you want observable results you have to apply a sufficient perturbation to overcome inertia and noise.

    9. Re:Skills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV or toilet, who cares? The only difference is the direction of shit. With toilets, it goes in, with TVs, it comes out.

      Obviously you've never been around a prison toilet. There is no guarantee regarding the direction it flows once flushed.

    10. Re:Skills... by daem0n1x · · Score: 1

      So, it's kind of like interactive TV?

    11. Re:Skills... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      How would taxpayers pay the jail more than $30,000/yr for keeping them out of jail? Pay 40k for every empty bed in a jail? Wouldn't that possibly lead to corruption, jails hiring better lawyers for criminals so they can run the streets? Maybe a better incentive would be to give the criminal $$$ to stay out of jail, an increasing incentive over the yrs. Perhaps $1000 after first yr, 2k second yr, and 3k third yr. 6k is nothing compared to the 90k if he was in jail those years, and 1, 2, and 3 grand is a lot to someone who has trouble finding jobs paying over minimum wage, but probably not so much that people would be committing crimes to get 3k three years after being released

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    12. Re:Skills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are making the assumption that the prison itself has the lion's share of the impact upon inmate recidivism; you should not do this. Recidivism is largely tied to external factors that prison officials cannot affect. For example, prison officials have had a limited say in the transformation of the parole system into the United States to more of a "control" orientation, with increased emphasis on revoking parole for minor crimes. More simply, increased or decreased recidivism rates do not mean that a prison is doing any better or worse job with its inmates. Prison wardens cannot be held so neatly responsible for what happens to individuals after they leave prison, nor should they be.

      Also, quit with the delta talk; Criminology is not a science. And yes, I Am A Criminologist

    13. Re:Skills... by Kaboom13 · · Score: 1

      The unions of the Prison Guards are one of the biggest players in the "prisoner industry". Even in government run prisons, they have a vested interest in high prisoner populations, and have a lot of political clout. Anytime a politician tries to reform prisons, he can be guaranteed to be slammed for being "soft on crime". The reality is most prisoners are from the poor and minorities and have little to no political clout. They are an easy target, and the few brave enough to stand up for their rights are trampled down by the reflex to "punish" rather then reform.

    14. Re:Skills... by skarphace · · Score: 1

      No one should have a vested interest in a high recidivism rate, particularly not when people's liberties are at stake. It does not serve society's interests.

      There, fixed that for you.

      Just for a great example, that judge from Pennsylvania that was handing down way too harsh sentences and doing his best to keep the detention facility packed full of kids. I would also lump law enforcement and the military into the pile of things that should never be motivated by profit. When people's lives and liberties are at stake(you know, important shit), there is no reason people should have a profit motive. Otherwise, we'd see more and more people being killed or caged so someone can make an extra buck.

      --
      Bullish Machine Tzar
    15. Re:Skills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fair enough. As long as I also get $1k, $2k, ... $60k per year for being a law abiding citizen and never going to jail.

    16. Re:Skills... by ps2os2 · · Score: 0

      Droopus: You are being much too cynical.

      If you can find one single case to back up your supposition then let us hear it.

      Society in general, does not want crime. The wardens and criminal justice system have little or no vested interest in criminal recidivism. Lawyers on the other hand... well we all know lawyers are the scum of society. That might be the "proof" you need though.

    17. Re:Skills... by dangitman · · Score: 1

      If the government was interested in a low recidivism rate, they would reward facilities for it. Look at averages for rates of return, and reward facilities that turn out better than that. As an example, if the average for a certain type of criminal is to have a 50% recidivism rate within 5 years, track the ex-prisoners, and give an actual cash award to the prison if they average 40% over 6 years. This opens the whole system back up to the private sector to resolve.

      This has the same flaws as "No Child Left Behind." You end up defunding the prisons that are doing the worst, thus aggravating the problem, because they don't have the funds to fix problems. You end up with a downward spiral to total failure.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    18. Re:Skills... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you point very interesting points. And indeed your plan would have room for private initiatives to implement new ways of doing things better.
      The only problem that I see is: the current setup might be one of the reasons behind the fact that the representatives did not have low recividism rate as their interest: it is difficult to guarantee that they represent the electorate and not the contributors to their campaigns. Unfortunately, most of the time the private sector finds it easier and cheaper to bribe the public organism that is responsible for overseeing it rather than having a real good performance. In some areas, the benefits of private initiative offsets the risks, in some others I don't think we should be taking any chance.

      Nina

  3. sensitive data? by wiplash · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine a certain degree of integrity is required to handle third-party data. While it may not be a fair assumption, it is possible that some people involved with such a program may not be the most reliable of people...
    Are they going to be careful about what kind of data they would be sharing with these inmates? Are there going to be restrictions in place to stop them from copying this data?
    Will they be genuinely interested in what the weather is like where I am?

    1. Re:sensitive data? by sohp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RTFA: banking information. What could possibly go wrong?

    2. Re:sensitive data? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      RTFA: banking information. What could possibly go wrong?

      I dunno ... maybe they enter a "." instead of a "," (or visa versa depending on whether they're entering US or European numeric data).

      Waaaaaaait a minute ... what if it was one of them who screwed up the data that caused the dip in the US stock market last week?

    3. Re:sensitive data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you care as long as you can buy your shoes in Walmart for $24.99 ??

    4. Re:sensitive data? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Everything could be cut into bits that on their own are meaningless. Punching in an address by ID# rather than name.

      Not that I think they'd bother doing it right. I'm just saying it could be possible. Also, not all data entry is really sensitive data.

    5. Re:sensitive data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is cheap labor, stop asking so many questions. Do you know what this will save out company in cost this quarter alone?

  4. 25 cents? Not in the feds... by droopus · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just came home from a lovely four year stay at a fed prison. Yes, you can eventually make $.25 an hour, but you have to work up to that.

    See federal (BOP) pay scales here.

    FPI (UNICOR) is the prison industries. Read: slave labor for government profit. At the facility I was at there was a data processing factory, fixing bad OCR scans by entering Postscript commands.

    However, anyone with any computer skills was forbidden from working there, so my job was Captain's Crew...cleaning the sidealks for half hour every day. Nice use of my MCSE, no?

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    1. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just came home from a lovely four year stay at a fed prison.

      I gotta ask... Did they have conjugal visits there? I haven't had a conjugal visit in like six months.

    2. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Nice use of my MCSE, no?
      You were in fucking prison. Don't expect any concessions though. If you felt that bad, you shouldn't have gone to prison in first place.

    3. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Prison. Where they teach you that honest hard labour gets you next to nothing.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    4. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      So how many times in that 4 years did you hear the "federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison" joke?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    5. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      how long until our governments start imprisoning citizens for a source a cheap labour of big bussiness?

      we must privatize everything, including freedom!

    6. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just as much use as my mcse, and no prison time, just the fact the op seems to think mcse means anything other than "your a dipshit that is now poorer" boggles me

    7. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could not give a rat's ass as to whether you made nothing or 25 cents an hour...at least in consideration of your welfare. Slave? If you can't do the time and hard labor, don't do the crime. Cry me a river.

      That said, private industry should not be running these operations.

    8. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Maybe he was one of the x% wrongfully imprisoned.

      (x goes from 0.01 to 0.6 depending on who you ask)

    9. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by droopus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uh huh. And everyone that ends up in prison:

      A) Deserves fully to be there, and

      B) Was treated fairly and justly by the US Justice system.

      No disrespect intended at all, but you have much to learn. I hope your lesson isn't as difficult as mine was. The justice system in this country is insane and grossly unfair.

      The US has 3% of the world's population and 25% of it's prison population. Numerically and per capita, we have the highest prison population on the planet...and that includes China..a tougher regime that is three times our size.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    10. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by droopus · · Score: 5, Informative

      Only from people who actually believe what they see on TV. Prison can be very violent, but that stupid "don't bend over for the soap" stuff doesn't happen. In fact, even suggesting it is a good way to get shanked.

      CSI, Law and Order, Prison Break, etc are utter propaganda.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    11. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Kozz · · Score: 1

      Surely you're not interested in telling your entire story... but you did open the door, so I'll ask: was your conviction related to technology/IT?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    12. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Itninja · · Score: 2, Informative

      So how many times in that 4 years did you have to pay for rent, food, clothes, medical care, dental care, etc.? I think if you take all that into account, it far exceeds minimum wage. A good friend of mine spent 10 years in prison and commented shortly after his release that his standard of living was higher while inside.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    13. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That sounds like the old arguments for slavery...

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    14. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it is a good way to prepare for the outside world.

    15. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      If it did, /. would become the biggest den of thieves in history pretty much overnight.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    16. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by maxume · · Score: 1

      By some measures...

      I get a lot of living out of going and doing stuff on a whim.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You think this hasn't been done already? In the South, local sheriffs used to do this all the time (and still do in many places). Every year around harvest time for tobacco or cotton, they would go around and round up all the local drunkards/ne'r-do-wells/etc. and throw them in jail for whatever. Then they would hire them out as work gangs to local farmers, with the sheriff pocketing almost all of the money. The work gangs that a lot of Southern jails and prisons still use today are, in fact, just a historical extension of the old antebellum slave gangs. They even have the same structure (4-7 slaves and one overseer). They're great for shitty manual labor jobs (you can get them for about $1 an hour per prisoner/slave, even cheaper than hiring illegals).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    18. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by droopus · · Score: 1

      No, it wasn't. Nor was it drug dealing, terrorism, sedition, rape, murder, bank robbery, kidnapping, pedophilia, or anything that might be considered a crime against the united states.

      Mail me at my nym at gmail and I'll discuss. B)

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    19. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nice use of my MCSE, no?

      Perhaps they had sufficient skill and experience on-staff to handle any Solitaire and Minesweeper issues that came up.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    20. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if you consider the lowest quality food (cold bologna + plain white bread=dinner), substandard medical care, etc to be a good quality of life. And I wouldn't call living with a bunch of criminals, constantly surrounded by noise, the untreated mentally ill, and the constant potential for violence to be "rent free living" either. I wouldn't exactly pay for that if I didn't have to.

      Now that I think about it I can think of some parts of my city that qualify for that description though so maybe that is why some folks there aren't afraid to go to prison.

    21. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      The US has 3% of the world's population and 25% of it's prison population. Numerically and per capita, we have the highest prison population on the planet...and that includes China..a tougher regime that is three times our size.

      Might have something to do with the Chinese policy of keeping the prison population low by the simple expedient of taking a fair number of their convicts outside and shooting them.

    22. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Funny

      The right to conjugal visits only guarantees you that your partner can visit for that purpose, it doesn't actually guarantee you a partner...

    23. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound pretty proud of your prison saty. My guess is you were there for a good reason. So suck it up.

    24. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Nice use of my MCSE, no?

      Maybe you should have kept your nose clean and OUT OF FEDERAK PRISON? Mmmm?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    25. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your slashdot is only 5 digits so you must be an old timer. Must've been something good to put you in the pen, do tell!

    26. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by zill · · Score: 1

      (x goes from 0.01 to 0.6 depending on who you ask)

      Excuse me, I think you forgot the x = 100 case, i.e. where we survey the prison population.

    27. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Sure. Except that these 'slaves' were convicted by a jury in a court of law. It's not as if they were snatched from their homes and forced to do manual labor for their 'master'.

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    28. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be that as it may, but I have heard/read in various places/times that, in some US demographics, Prison time is becoming something of a retirement plan. And when you think about it, it sort of makes sense. I mean, given the choice of living in a violent, inhospitable location with plenty of freedom but little prospects for quality work, low quality food, and never mind things like health care. On the other hand, the other location which, while also violent and inhospitable, always provides you with a roof over your head, food on your plate, and an on-site clinic... well, you get the picture... Violent and inhospitable being constant across the two options, the choice becomes rather clear, for some anyway...

      "The views expressed here are mine and do not reflect the official opinion of my employer or the organization through which the Internet was accessed."

    29. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by martas · · Score: 1

      well, to be fair, it sounds like you were at a white collar prison... i don't think maximum security is that nice (at least no hdtv, i'd expect).

    30. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by martas · · Score: 1

      sadly, some juries are so fundamentally moronic that directly getting snatched from home may have been the less frustrating (and no more unjust) method of ending up in jail for some people.

    31. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, to be fair, it sounds like you were at a white collar prison

      A white collar prison where saying the wrong thing gets you shanked?

    32. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Itninja · · Score: 1

      Indeed. But when it comes to an educated populace we get what we pay for ;)

      --
      I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
    33. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, [my crime] wasn't [related to technology]. Nor was it drug dealing, terrorism, sedition, rape, murder, bank robbery, kidnapping, pedophilia, or anything that might be considered a crime against the united states.

      None of those? Well, that just leaves...hmm...let me think...oh God...

      You're the guy who greenlighted all those Wayans Brothers movies.

      You son of a bitch. They should have thrown away the key.

    34. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 1

      $2.20 is roughly the average daily (non-incarcerated) wage in India. So it appears that they are being paid competitively, considering they are in prison and in need of some new job skills.

    35. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      I imagine it is pretty variable by the prison and security level.

    36. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      Sounds like childhood. No fiscal responsibilities but you have to do chores you don't want to, have people that you aren't allowed to argue with, can get stuck in solitaire and get an allowance that you can't spend since you never really get to go out.

    37. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The tone and substance of your reply tacitly admits that you deserved to be there (even if not 'fully').

      So yeah, the GP is right - if you didn't want to go to prison, you shouldn't have done whatever it was that put you there. And when you did go there, you should have expected to be treated as a prisoner not as something 'special' because you have a dime-a-dozen MCSE.

    38. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by ebuck · · Score: 1

      So prison work programs are required to provide only incompetent labor? Seems to me that they could get a lot more done with skilled labor. Perhaps those workers should be fired as soon as they show any improvement in the work they perform?

    39. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Spazztastic · · Score: 1

      Only from people who actually believe what they see on TV. Prison can be very violent, but that stupid "don't bend over for the soap" stuff doesn't happen.

      That may be because you were in Federal Prison. My friends dad was a big wig in the DOJ for New Jersey and he told me that the Federal Prison system is far better then the other ones (Not sure what it would be referred to, state prison?).

      Of course, YMMV. Correct me if I am wrong or not, droopus.

      --
      Posts not to be taken literally. Almost everything is sarcasm.
    40. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by droopus · · Score: 2

      Only from people who actually believe what they see on TV. Prison can be very violent, but that stupid "don't bend over for the soap" stuff doesn't happen.

      That may be because you were in Federal Prison. My friends dad was a big wig in the DOJ for New Jersey and he told me that the Federal Prison system is far better then the other ones (Not sure what it would be referred to, state prison?).

      Of course, YMMV. Correct me if I am wrong or not, droopus.

      Absolutely true. State prisons are MUCH worse. After all, the murderers and rapists go to state, not feds.

      I spent a few weeks in a state holdover before my case went federal and I feared for my life every day.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    41. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      MCSE: Must Consult Someone Else

    42. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Hans Reiser, is that you?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    43. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      While I agree incarcerating MSCE's is a bit harsh, they should pay for their crimes against society someway.

    44. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by CopaceticOpus · · Score: 1

      I get it... you were in for spamming! I think I will not email you. :)

    45. Re:25 cents? Not in the feds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      25c/hour
      PLUS
      Roof over your head
      Meals
      I guess medical care (but since you are in the states, maybe not)
      etc etc...

      Not saying that prison is a comfy life, far from it, but if you will compare prisoners working with non-prisoners working, you must take into account ALL the factors.

  5. Safe by courteaudotbiz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Your data will be VERY safe when you hand it to those prisoners...

    1. Re:Safe by camg188 · · Score: 1

      The article says they will be processing banking data.
      -what a great idea-

    2. Re:Safe by Skapare · · Score: 2, Funny

      Exactly! ... as long as each prisoner has one of those PHBs overlooking them at all times, just like in the picture.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  6. Slavery in America Today by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And India, Too! We can't leave a slave-gap open, with the Reds in China!

    My Dear God. The world is back into nightmares decried by Dickens and Sinclair Lewis. If you haven't read these, I would suggest doing so. In fact, if you have, a refresh is in order.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:Slavery in America Today by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      And yet if prisoners were denied opportunities to work, you and your kind would be up front and center decrying the waste of manpower in prison, as well as the lack of job retraining skills for otherwise idle hands. Isn't this why we have call centers in prisons nowadays instead of chain gangs breaking rocks into gravel?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Slavery in America Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't insightful. This is yet another liberal twisting of logic.

    3. Re:Slavery in America Today by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Raj: Hi, this is Raj. Thank you for calling Bank of Regret. How may I help you?
      Customer: I see some irregular activity on my account and I'd like to talk to someone about it.
      Raj: I apologize for the inconvenience. Am I correct to understand that you would like to talk to someone about the irregular activity on your account?
      Customer: Um, yes. Yes I would. That's what I said.
      Raj: Am I correct to understand that that is what you said?
      Customer: Yes! Just get someone who can explain these large wire transfers!
      Raj (hand over the receiver): Who handles large wire transfers?
      Dani: I do!
      Raj: One moment please. I'll transfer you to Dani. He handles large wire transfers ...

    4. Re:Slavery in America Today by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      No.

      Then, I would be still be free to decry the creation of "laws" to criminalize a significant percentage of the population, while creating private profit incentives for incarceration - and the requisite prioritization of public monies for penitentiary over school house.

      I have Dickens, you have Rand. You lose.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    5. Re:Slavery in America Today by panda · · Score: 1

      Back? The world never left, my friend.

      --
      Just be sure to wear the gold uniform when you beam down -- you know what happens when you wear the red one.
    6. Re:Slavery in America Today by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Rand? What the F are you talking about? I'm no Randroid. You're projecting, bigtime.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Slavery in America Today by operagost · · Score: 1

      What you have is a straw man.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:Slavery in America Today by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      And yet if prisoners were denied opportunities to work, you and your kind would be up front and center decrying the waste of manpower in prison, as well as the lack of job retraining skills for otherwise idle hands.

      I don't know about the GP poster and "his kind", but the waste of manpower prison is a good thing: it provides an economic incentive to not lock people up. When locking me up means that you lose the tax dollars I pay, and have to provide me with room and board, you're only going to lock me up if I'm a threat. If by locking me up you get my skills for pennies on the dollar, there's a perverse incentive.

      Job training does not imply selling the trainee's labor.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  7. Identity theft by zoomshorts · · Score: 0

    Sure, let known criminals have access to customer data, once again Rocket Surgery
    rears it's ugly head. Such a retarded idea. Jeeze.

  8. This is a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who better to digitize our identity records and health care data than criminals?

  9. scary thought by Paul+Rose · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Radiant: we're a little short on staff -- think you could raise the penalty for jaywalking?
    Congressman: can do!

    1. Re:scary thought by notommy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In India what we would consider jaywalking is known as "crossing the street". So no, your nightmare scenario would never happen. Otherwise everyone would be in jail.

    2. Re:scary thought by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, wouldn't that just make it really easy to boost staffing levels?

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    3. Re:scary thought by TheRon6 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Radiant: we're a little short on staff -- think you could raise the penalty for jaywalking?

      Congressman: can do!

      This exact sort of thing is already happening in the U.S. except rather than keeping people in prison to make them work, the prison lobby wants to keep people in prison for the sake of needing to build more prisons. We've got both the prisons' investors and prison guard unions constantly lobbying for harsher punishments for lesser offenses. It's a scary to think that it's profitable for anyone to lock people up and throw away the key...

      --
      Does this rag smell like chloroform to you?
    4. Re:scary thought by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not really a joke. Post civil war, that's basically what they did to get the newly emancipated back in their place, where possible. All sorts of crimes ("vagrancy") and the like, heavy enforcement against the undesirables, and then lease the resulting convicts out as cheap slave labor to various upstanding local businesses.

      All perfectly legal and above board.

      These days, of course, we have the private, for-profit prison, a truly brilliant institution. The outfits that run these are very reliable "law-and-order" lobbyists, and there was even a case a while back where they were paying a judge a per-inmate kickback for, shall we say, "referrals"...

    5. Re:scary thought by E-Arkham · · Score: 2, Interesting
      We might already be doing that in the states.

      I drove through South Carolina recently and noticed signs that stated the penalty for speeding in a work zone was $200 and 30 days. On the surface, you might think that's reasonable to keep road workers safe.

      But there are long stretches of highway marked as work zones with NO sign of workers, equipment, or construction. Nothing. And state law says workers do not need to be present. These were for all intents and purposes speed zones where getting caught got you 30 days in jail, and judging by the cars left on the side of the road (I counted 6 on one highway) it looks like they're enforcing it regularly.

    6. Re:scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      We're already there. See War on Drug.

      also, judge(s) too.

    7. Re:scary thought by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      It's a very profitable growth industry--right up until the point where everyone is either in prison or working at one (causing the government to go bankrupt and ending the gravy train).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:scary thought by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      . . . another reason never to go to South Carolina.

    9. Re:scary thought by cats-paw · · Score: 1

      and don't forget Larry Niven's story about perfected organ transplants causing the penalty to be death for minor infractions.

      --
      Absolute statements are never true
    10. Re:scary thought by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Just FYI: This was EXACTLY how Stalin’s gulags worked. Every time the humans in there were used up (literally. worked to death), Stalin would make up a new “enemies of the state” “fringe” group, and send them there.

      And in my opinion this also exactly is the goal of those many many huge new prisons that Cheney’s company has built or is still building. Also, isn’t the percentage of people in jail in the US already one of the highest in the world?

      Well, I can’t really be sad for people who let a tiny group of people (the shareholders for “the government”) treat them like this. Hell, most of them out there don’t even complain, but think that this is completely normal.
      I wonder if I would be able to fight it, with all that fast food taking away every last bit of energy, and getting brainwashed by school, FOX, lies-only media and churches your whole life.

      (I’m not saying I’m much better then them, or in a much better society. I’m saying that I care. That’s all.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    11. Re:scary thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it won't. Because then everybody would be in jail, including all the potential staff.

      So then, India's prison system (which itself now includes outsourcing units) will itself have to be outsourced, and the universe will implode.

  10. Looks like the resource budget... by ezbo · · Score: 1

    ...is less than the wages. I didn't even think they made CRTs anymore.

    1. Re:Looks like the resource budget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use dual CRTs you insensitive clod!

  11. Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I understand their desire to remain relevant and competitive in the out-sourcing marketplace, but dang man, enough is enough.

    Seriously. This will probably sound racist as hell, but whatever, I don't care. I'm sick to death of calling into some company for support and struggling mightily to understand the person on the other end. Sick of it. It does not do these companies any good at all to have such unpleasant customer service experiences.

    I realize that English is not these folks primary language, and for it being ESL for them, they do a good job. But when I call in for support to a company "based in the US", damnit, I expect to hear a US voice.

    Again, call me racist, whatever you want. I really don't give a shit at this point, I'm frigging sick of it. For companies that outsource to these places to "lower costs", you're also lowering profit, due to craptastic customer service, lack of caring, and a strict adherence to "following the script".

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm sick to death of calling into some company for support and struggling mightily to understand the person on the other end.

      I realize that English is not these folks primary language, and for it being ESL for them, they do a good job. But when I call in for support to a company "based in the US", damnit, I expect to hear a US voice.

      Except that a "US voice" doesn't necessarily help.

      I've called technical support lines and gotten someone with an impossibly thick southern drawl before. At least that's what I assume it was. Maybe they were drunk. Regardless, it was clear that they were from the southern US, but I couldn't understand half of what they were saying.

      Why is a clear speaking voice not a requirement for these positions?

      I don't care where you're located geographically, as long as you can speak clearly.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    2. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by sdpuppy · · Score: 1
      Then next time buy the product from another company.

      and be sure to write a letter to the offending company the reason that you will not do repeat business with them.

    3. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      I hear this statement a lot, that Southern US dialects are hard to understand. But, I've never had a "Joe-Bob" from LA (That's Lower Alabama, btw) answer my phone call into tech support. Mainly because Joe-Bob isn't working tech support.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    4. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Language doesn't matter. I understand your issues, but it's a lack of emotional investment in their job and a lack of knowledge that's worse than language barriers. English or not, someone who is being paid minimum wage to work the telephones won't want to do too much work to help you.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    5. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Red+Flayer · · Score: 1

      For companies that outsource to these places to "lower costs", you're also lowering profit, due to craptastic customer service, lack of caring, and a strict adherence to "following the script".

      Do you have the numbers to back that up?

      I suspect that the truth is that it actually DOES increase profit, in most cases. So what if customers are pissed off? What are they going to do, switch over to another service provider that also sends customer support offshore? The truth, I believe, is that lots of people moan and complain about "Janet" from Bangalore reading from a script, but few people actually put their money where their mouth is.

      If you buy a laptop, are you checking to see where the manufacturer hosts their customer service before you buy? How about when you set up internet service? Do you find out if Verizon, your cable company, or other ISP offshores their customer support?

      You may feel that companies are doing wrong because you're not happy with the customer support they provide. But really, how much are you worth to them? Are you, and others like you, worth enough to justify tripling their support costs? And if all their competitors are doing the same thing, is off-shored support really going to drive that many customers away?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    6. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, your point is these maxims: Customer service over profit; Customer happiness over profit.

      And you're expecting that from greedy corporate America? Haha. You're not racist, you're just stupid.

    7. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by SandFrog · · Score: 1

      At one point I was driving a semi to make ends meet
      while the IT scene was recovering (circa 2002/03 ish).
      I stopped at some fast food joint in Minnesota. It took
      me a while to realize that the lady behind the counter
      actually was speaking English. She couldn't understand me
      either.

      --
      Contentment is the greatest wealth
      - Sukhavagga Dhammapada
      Contentment is the goal behind all goals.
    8. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you'd call them "numbers" or what, but I do know several large companies (Dell, for instance) have shipped call center jobs back to the US due to the public outcry.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    9. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      No, AC, my point is that if you have a better customer service experience, and happy customers, they'll be loyal customers who enjoy pimping your products for you.

      So I may not be racist, but I think keeping your customers happy is a good thing, call that stupid if you want.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    10. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      At one point I was driving a semi to make ends meet

      while the IT scene was recovering (circa 2002/03 ish).

      I stopped at some fast food joint in Minnesota. It took

      me a while to realize that the lady behind the counter

      actually was speaking English. She couldn't understand me

      either.

      Indeed.

      I'm from Minnesota originally... We do speak a bit differently there, especially the older folks who still have a strong Scandinavian accent. And I've got family from various parts of Kentucky.

      Family gatherings can be fun.

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    11. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I would not be surprised if that "impossibly thick southern drawl" was coming from a Bangalore-based operator poorly trained in mimicking American accents.

    12. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Macrat · · Score: 1

      >

      I've called technical support lines and gotten someone with an impossibly thick southern drawl before. At least that's what I assume it was. Maybe they were drunk.%

    13. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by SlowGenius · · Score: 1

      Although low wages might interfere with job satisfaction, relatively high wages are no guarantee of quality or emotional investment. Trust me, I'm a doctor.

      --
      Listen to what I say, not what I mean...
    14. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there a correlation between bloatware on a new laptop and whether the customer support is outsourced?

      Take customer support for what it is. If they fail to resolve the issue, what about filing a complaint with the Better Business Bureau?

    15. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regardless, it was clear that they were from the southern US, but I couldn't understand half of what they were saying.

      Why is a clear speaking voice not a requirement for these positions?

      He was speaking clearly. For Alabama. Just because you refuse to believe that the Iraq War was all about Earl...

    16. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Forgetting job satisfaction for a moment, it's more of a case of how desperate a person would have to be to do phone support. Someone who has so few options is probably not the best or most experienced person to help you.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    17. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by tekrat · · Score: 1

      Then why bother with customer service at all?

      Or have the entire thing automated.

      When you call Verizon now, to tell them you have no dial-tone (using my cell phone to tell them my landline is down), you're shuttled through a completely automated system that even "checks your line" for you. Whether it actually does *anything* or not for real isn't the issue, but it gives the illusion of customer service.

      eBay, for example has NO customer service, and yet, they are the largest company in their category, proof that you don't need to maintain *any* kind of customer service, so I'm surprized that corporations even bother to maintain a call center at all.

      Secondly why have a "call center"? It's a telephone and computer. You should be able to have a PBX route incoming calls to people's home lines, and they all work from home. No "call center" itself is even needed.

      --
      If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    18. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Well, in Nanaimo, BC, Canada, there used to be a company that did contract telephone work for all kinds of companies. They did telemarketing for all kinds of businesses, they also did tech support for T-Mobil and for Microsoft (or at least, for MSN and Hotmail). Still, even though a BC accent is indistinguishable from a Washington or Oregon accent. (or the one California guy I know), they couldn't tell anybody they weren't in the USA or Americans would get very mad. The standard instruction if somebody asks where you are located, was to tell them "Pacific Northwest, Near Seattle". Technically true ;) I never did get why they were there. Not only is our minimum wage not THAT low even with the historically low Canadian dollar, they were located in a mall, which I can't imagine offers cheap rent compared to a floor on in an office building...

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    19. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's cute :)

    20. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Sure, but also keep in mind that products are designed to have a short life-span before requiring replacement.

      People remember negative experiences and on the next go-round, they'll bloody-well think twice about buying another lap-top from the company which gave them a bad experience. Pavlovian responses work that way. I can think of several companies I will never buy from again, and have indeed exercised that option. I can also think of several companies whose customer service has won a great deal of loyalty from me.

      Though, these days I'd rather buy used off eBay than get something new. There's already too much crap being manufactured. I like to think that I'm contributing to the downfall of our current economic system by building, repairing and re-using goods, working on barter and generally refusing to borrow money.

      -FL

    21. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Kittenman · · Score: 1
      I think your gripe isn't that the support staff on the phone weren't in the US, but that they weren't good at giving support. 'Being good at support' includes making yourself a) pleasant and b)understandable, as well as c) giving good advice.

      I'm in NZ. I deal with support staff in the US (sometimes) who are good at a) and b) but not c). And I've dealt with support staff in lord knows what country in East Asia who are good at a) but not b). I've no idea about c) - I couldn't understand them.

      So you're not racist. You just deal with bad support staff.

      --
      "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
    22. Re:Trying to remain "competitive" I guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked at a tech support place once & had a guy with tourettes in our training classes.

      Likewise, a blind girl, and people with zero computer experience at all.

      Seems like the only requirement for tech support these days is you're capable of breathing.

      And in case you're wondering, Tourettes guy never made it out of Training & had a sexual harrassment lawsuit brought against him by the end of our 3 week training course. Man I was happy to leave that place.

  12. Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you wanted to make good use of your skills, how about getting a real job and working for a living like the rest of us instead of peddling pot or whatever got you busted?
    You broke the law and suffered the consequences, you have no right to complain.

    1. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's peddling pot less "real" and less "work" than most other jobs in this country?

    2. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Skapare · · Score: 1, Interesting

      If he had an MCSE, then he didn't need to peddle pot, or whatever. Sure, if you are good at peddling pot and other drugs, you can make a LOT more money than the top MCSEs can ever dream of. But that's certainly not making use of an MCSE.

      Once you are untrusted ... and being a felon makes one untrusted ... then you can't be trusted around anything you might know how to manipulate for your own benefit. And an MCSE just shouts "I know how to manipulate computers". IMHO, any felon should be stripped of their MCSE, or any other IT or engineering certification, and not allowed to get another for at least 10 years after release ... 10 years of scraping sidewalks on the outside!

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    3. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by droopus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      LOL.."peddling pot" does not get you into the feds unless you have 50,000 pounds of it.

      You seem to be yet another person that assumes what you learn from your tv education is immutable truth. Once again...3% of the world's population, 25% of its prison inmates. Do you not understand this? Do you really think the US is a nation of felons?

      I'm not looking for, or interested in your, or anyone else's fucking sympathy. I'm trying to tell you to wake up, and watch out for yourself.

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    4. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Intentionally taking out of context and twisting your words here:

      Once again...3% of the world's population, 25% of its prison inmates. Do you not understand this? Do you really think the US is a nation of felons?

      Well since the numbers seem to bear that out, yes. Obviously since you are one too I will believe what you say about that and take it as truth ;)

      though I always thought Australia was the nation of felons...

      Back in reality, yes our system is fscked up like no other. I really wish for three things:
      1) put back the support structure (mental health, training, etc.) that we used to have in prisons before privatization.
      2) put the prison system back under federal control (not outsourced to private companies)
      3) a pony.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    5. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what planet you are from, but yes, the US is a nation of felons, most of which is gun crime. We have the lowest school scores, the highest political corruption, and the highest drug addiction rate. This country is tearing itself apart. We had someone shot to death in our parking lot just a few days ago. I'm scared to go outside. I'm driving just a few miles to work each day but it feels like I'm driving a Humvee in Iraq or something. I can't bear to turn the news on anymore. I just want to work and make a decent living and not get shot in the face by some drug addict.

    6. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the resident right-wing Tea Party faggots have some mod points to spend today.

    7. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You seem to be yet another person that assumes what you learn from your tv education is immutable truth. Once again...3% of the world's population, 25% of its prison inmates. Do you not understand this? Do you really think the US is a nation of felons?

      Ah, yes, now I see. That statistic proves that everything we've ever known is a lie, all prisoners are innocent, you by extension are completely innocent, we should start a revolution against that dadblasted gummint!, and whine whine whine bitch bitch bitch INJUSTICEZ0RZ!!!

      We've got no particular reason to believe you one way or the other here. We don't even have any reason we should believe that you spent even a second in a federal prison. As far as we're concerned, you're just another dime-a-dozen zomg i hate teh government type we get here in Slashdot, bringing in stories about a guy you knew who knew a guy whose brother knew a guy who INJUSTICEZ0RZ!!! And if you DID spend time in a federal prison, why should we believe you were in there unjustly?

      Why should we listen at all to you whinging about your MCSE, in fact? What the hell does THAT matter? Hans Reiser was, in all probability, far more brilliant and creative with his programming talents than you could ever dream to be, and yet he murdered his wife and got busted for it. lawl wut a waste of his taletz lawlright? INJUSTICEZ0RZ!

      Unless you've got some magic evidence in your favor that teh evul gummints! don't WANT us to see, maaaaaan that obviously didn't make it to court, we. just. don't. care.

    8. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by tibman · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you need to get out of that city man.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    9. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by droopus · · Score: 1

      You seem to be yet another person that assumes what you learn from your tv education is immutable truth. Once again...3% of the world's population, 25% of its prison inmates. Do you not understand this? Do you really think the US is a nation of felons?

      Ah, yes, now I see. That statistic proves that everything we've ever known is a lie, all prisoners are innocent, you by extension are completely innocent, we should start a revolution against that dadblasted gummint!, and whine whine whine bitch bitch bitch INJUSTICEZ0RZ!!!

      Um, and I say this exactly where? I neither said nor alluded to anything you just wrote. In fact, generalizations are something I assiduously avoid.

      We've got no particular reason to believe you one way or the other here. We don't even have any reason we should believe that you spent even a second in a federal prison. As far as we're concerned, you're just another dime-a-dozen zomg i hate teh government type we get here in Slashdot, bringing in stories about a guy you knew who knew a guy whose brother knew a guy who INJUSTICEZ0RZ!!! And if you DID spend time in a federal prison, why should we believe you were in there unjustly?

      And, again, where did I say this? Oh, you need to clean some of that spittle off your little netbook screen. There you go...

      Why should we listen at all to you whinging about your MCSE, in fact? What the hell does THAT matter? Hans Reiser was, in all probability, far more brilliant and creative with his programming talents than you could ever dream to be, and yet he murdered his wife and got busted for it. lawl wut a waste of his taletz lawlright? INJUSTICEZ0RZ!

      I whinged exactly where? I simply demonstrated that the BOP does not make use of specific skills in their assignation of jobs. For example, your talent as a screaming fruitcake would not automatically assign you to suicide watch or anything.

      And how would you possibly have the slightest knowledge of my coding skills?

      Now see? There's more spittle. Give it another wipe. Good lad.

      Unless you've got some magic evidence in your favor that teh evul gummints! don't WANT us to see, maaaaaan that obviously didn't make it to court, we. just. don't. care.

      "We?" Is that the royal "we?" Or are there more than a few people in that head of yours?

      BTW, which makes the better hat? Reynolds Wrap, Alcoa, or just generic "foil?"

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    10. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      You seem to be yet another person that assumes what you learn from your tv education is immutable truth. Once again...3% of the world's population, 25% of its prison inmates. Do you not understand this? Do you really think the US is a nation of felons?

      It's an impressive soundbite, but it has nothing to do with the issue at hand.
       

      I'm not looking for, or interested in your, or anyone else's fucking sympathy.

      Horseshit. Your very first post was whining for sympathy because they made you work rather than giving you a cushy job because of your MCSE. Then you whined for sympathy because you "didn't fully deserve to be there" and because "you weren't treated fairly". (I take both with a huge grain of salt because virtually every ex con I know says the same thing.)

    11. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He said he had a 4 year stint, I know nothing about his case, but it sounds like he took a plea bargain to me. His other option was probably looking at 30 years. Like most people in prison on pleas, guilt makes little difference, the opportunity cost of defending their innocence is way too high and recall, juries tend to be unkind to folks sitting in the defendant's seat and their case has already been cleared by a grand jury for prosecution (or they may even be technically guilty of a ridiculous law). There's a reason plea bargains are illegal in most first world countries.

      I seriously recommend you do some reading and tour some prisons and jails. There's also a reason some first world countries, such as Norway, have refused to extradite to our country. They stated our prisons don't meet the minimum standards of humane treatment.

    12. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Sale of *any amount* under 50 kilos gets you a mandatory 5 years. Plus fines.

      Distribution of any amount over 5 grams to a minor (under 21 years of age, not 18), OR within 1,000 feet of a school, housing project, youth center, video arcade, public pool, or playground automatically doubles the sentence and whatever fines.

      Selling a few joints to a 19 year old? 10 years.
      Average sentence for rape in the usa? 6 years.

      Yeah, that makes perfect sense.

      And... other sentencing enhancements can easily add a decade onto that.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    13. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by droopus · · Score: 2, Interesting

       

      I'm not looking for, or interested in your, or anyone else's fucking sympathy.

      Horseshit. Your very first post was whining for sympathy because they made you work rather than giving you a cushy job because of your MCSE.

      Really? Where did I "whine?" I only mentioned the BOP did not consider skills when assigning jobs. Actually, I had no interest in working for UNICOR. I worked less than 5 minutes a day for my $5.25 a month. UNICOR slaves work 6 - 8 hour days for their $.40 an hour. My point was almost NO ONE really works in a fed prison. Learn to read, hmm?

      And, FTR, I haven't used any knowledge from my MCSE in many, many years. Rather pointless nowadays.

      Then you whined for sympathy because you "didn't fully deserve to be there" and because "you weren't treated fairly". (I take both with a huge grain of salt because virtually every ex con I know says the same thing.)

      Exactly where did I say "I didn't fully deserve to be there?" Or that "I wasn't treated fairly?" Show me the quote from this thread, mmkay? The system is fucked up, indeed, but you are simply making shit up, for whatever reason I cannot fathom.

      And I suspect you know very few (if any) ex-cons. Otherwise you would have a tiny understanding of the system, which you clearly do not have.

      Why so angry?

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    14. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by magarity · · Score: 1

      How's peddling pot less "real" and less "work" than most other jobs in this country?
       
      The income tax collection rate for pot peddlers

    15. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And, FTR, I haven't used any knowledge from my MCSE in many, many years. Rather pointless nowadays.

      So you brought it up because...?

      What, is this some sort of MCSE mind trick they teach you so that you look all smarts and clevers to those with weak minds? Because I gotta say, it doesn't seem to be working with this crowd, and given this is Slashdot and the minds implied therein, that REALLY doesn't say a lot of good about your mind tricks, Obi-Wan.

    16. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by commrade · · Score: 1

      Not all felons have caused actual damage to society. Felonies are handed out to enemies of the state as a way of labeling them, keeping them out of the middle class no matter how hard they work. People are denied lawyers. Cops and other witnesses sometimes lie.

      Or would you rather believe that we have 1/4 of the world's prison population because Americans are just more likely to be criminals?

      Sincerely,
      A Felon

    17. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and being a felon makes one untrusted

      Not really, if you think about that a little more. It depends entirely nature of the felony.

    18. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 1

      There's a reason plea bargains are illegal in most first world countries.

      Who said the US is a first world country? I spent time in Indonesia. We're actually not that much better off in the US.

    19. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except I'm not and never have been. One of us is certainly stupid.

    20. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      And, FTR, I haven't used any knowledge from my MCSE in many, many years.

      Yet you whined you were forced to work outside rather than being allowed to use it.
       

      Exactly where did I say "I didn't fully deserve to be there?" Or that "I wasn't treated fairly?"

      Do you even read what you write or consider it's implicit meaning?
       

      And I suspect you know very few (if any) ex-cons. Otherwise you would have a tiny understanding of the system, which you clearly do not have.

      ROTFLMAO. The final defense of loser who realizes how badly he's losing the argument - the illogical and ignorant cry of "you don't agree with me, that means you don't know anything".

    21. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      "whine"

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      I haven't seen any complaining, only a sarcastic comment regarding inappropriate usage of available skillset. This, of course, follows your post that used nonexistent quotes to insinuate that he said something that he clearly didn't, which you went on to validate using the time-tested formula of psychically knowing what the other person was really thinking even though they didn't say it.

      I don't know if you are building a body of work to submit to Fox News as a portfolio or if you are just fucking retarded, but in either case you'll do yourself a world of good in preventing future back problems by getting that retarded chip off of your shoulder.

    22. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by droopus · · Score: 1

      Um, English isn't your first language, is it? Lessee..

      "all the ex-cons I know say they haven't been treated fairly. "

      I suspect you don't know many ex-cons.

      "hah! You are a loser! You disagree with me so neener neener ROFL pwned!!!"

      ???

      I also see you failed to quote my "whining" or my bleats of unfairness, preferring to spout some psychic obfuscatory rubbish about nonexistent "implicit" statements to which you alone are privy.

      Is that the sound of tin foil millinery I hear?

      ""

      --
      "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
    23. Re:Here's the world's smallest violin... by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      If you wanted to make good use of your skills, how about getting a real job and working for a living like the rest of us instead of peddling pot or whatever got you busted?
      You broke the law and suffered the consequences, you have no right to complain.

      It'll be interesting to hear you change your tune when you are placed in an internment camp. They're just going for the low-hanging fruit at the moment, but your turn will come if they don't kill you off in some other manner first.

      Nobody is safe from slavery. That's why we had an economic crash; to shunt wealth up the ladder and create a legion of homeless and poverty-stricken slaves. You think you're safe? It can all vanish in a puff, and when it's your turn, you will remember these words.

      -FL

  13. Pay-scales, cost-scales by John+Guilt · · Score: 1

    It's even worse: I'll wager (a pack of cigarettes, presumably, in the old days) that about $2.50 will buy more in an Indian prison commissary than in an American---although it _is_ a captive (ahem) audience, and the staff know how much the inmates generally earn, so I can see prices rising to meet that. But: are Indian prisons such that you have to pay extra to get anything close to decent to eat? I'm afraid of base-levels of food that might make Nutriloaf look good.

    1. Re:Pay-scales, cost-scales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You assume of course that they have things like commissaries in Indian jails. Judging from the conditions of their poor I'd say you'd be lucky not to be sleeping crammed together on the floor with a bucket for a toilet there.

    2. Re:Pay-scales, cost-scales by mehrotra.akash · · Score: 1

      Also, $2.2 is not much lower than what entry level call center operators make

  14. Still No Debtor's Prison by Ltap · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seems to paint the picture of a very Dickensian universe, the one exception of debtor's prison. Step 1: Inmates work for free/cheap Step 2: People with regular jobs lose those jobs Step 3: People go to debtor's prison, have to work for free/cheap Step 4: Permanent lower-class The only exception is that, now, there's even more of a stigma towards people who have spent time in jail, and it's easier for employers to find out.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    1. Re:Still No Debtor's Prison by astar · · Score: 1

      I RTFA on prison work and I read the high mod posts. Yours is the only one I saw that mentioned in some way depressed US living standards as a result of the prison labor. This slave labor stuff was getting a revival in the 1970's and some unions would try to raise a fuss. And in the 1970's, SEUI was a reformist union! The general point is that if you do not have some basic principles you really pay attention to, and a lot of guts, you end up toast. You just lose and lose until nothing is left. This is pretty much the game since 1945.

      Here is a fine question: What principle are you ready to die over today? None? Paradoxically, at this point, that is a fatal position.

    2. Re:Still No Debtor's Prison by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1
      You have to go to Dubai to find debtors' prisons these days. Apparently the United Arab Emirates in general still have them, unlike anywhere else in the world. (And apparently these are comparatively kind ones, where they just lock you up until you either pay your debt or they get tired of trying, and they actually give you food, unlike the English debtors' prisons where you were locked up until the person to whom you owed money filed to have you released, *and* you didn't get fed while in prison so either your family had to bring food to you or you starved to death.) We've gotten a LOT more civilized in the last 200 years.

      Of course, now everyone and their dog declares bankruptcy at a moment's notice, but I think that's better for society as a whole than the State starving people to death on a regular basis.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  15. US Prisons by FozE_Bear · · Score: 3, Informative

    I thought that some American Catalog companies were running call-centers with inmates as well in the mid '90's. Is this really new?

  16. Better than getting nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are many people (include me too) here without jobs. Better get into Indian Prison and get paid $2.20. That is what these assholes wanted anyway.

  17. Let's see how they rank by Quato · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's see $2.20 a day * 260 days a year (although I doubt they give them too many days off)
    = $572 bucks a year

    Let's plug it in The Global Rich list....
    http://www.globalrichlist.com/

    = 4,429,714,286
    You are the 4,429,714,286 richest person in the world!
    You're in the TOP 73.82% richest people in the world!

    1. Re:Let's see how they rank by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, in Somalia that would be great. Try scraping by in the US with $572 a year. Though in India I see that that is close to half the national average, so perhaps acceptable. Here in the states though, the GDP per capita is close to $48,000. Our prisoners are getting peanuts compared to India. Not that its too important since they're all in prison anyhow, but...ummm....I seem to have forgotten where I was going with this.

  18. Re:Skills...and a sat image of FCI Elkton! by droopus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, before anyone comments on the math:

    Each unit (building) was made up of two sub-units. Four toilets per sub-unit, 8 per unit.

    Wanna see the place?

    --
    "The pie shall be cut in half and each man shall receive.....death. I'll eat the pie."
  19. Hyperbole in America Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And India, Too! We can't leave a slave-gap open, with the Reds in China!

    My Dear God. The world is back into nightmares decried by Dickens and Sinclair Lewis. If you haven't read these, I would suggest doing so. In fact, if you have, a refresh is in order.

    You might want to read a little more history and a little less historical literature.

    Actual slaves were forced to work. If they didn't, they were beaten. Actual slaves were enslaved despite having committed no crime. Actual slaves had no hope of eventual freedom.

    I bet you're one of the people that calls overzealous rule enforcers "Nazis," too.

  20. Oh great... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Now the outsourcers will be giving our confidential banking account data to people in prison who have access to computers. Am I the only person who sees something wrong here?

    1. Re:Oh great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you just call Indians "people"? Hahahaha.

      They are the obedient, irrational, puppy-dog robots suited to one or two tasks that Asimov always wrote about.

  21. Re:Skills...and a sat image of FCI Elkton! by Dishevel · · Score: 3, Funny
    are you seriously pointing us to a site that requires Silverlight?

    *Sigh*

    --
    Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
  22. Two countries, *united* by a common language by JohnQPublic · · Score: 1

    It isn't often that you see an article where the British and US usages of "scheme" are BOTH correct.

  23. Will computing be criminal ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... when only criminals have computers?

  24. IT + Prison? by Ubiquitous+Bubba · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait a minute. My cubicle feels like a cell. My wardrobe is defined by Corporate Goons. At the whim of a bureaucrat, I can be sent, against my will, anywhere in the country. Many time's, I've been awakened in the middle of the night by alarms and screaming. (Usually, the voices are saying things like, "The servers are down!" or "My Email is gone!") Have I been in prison all along? That would explain some of the meetings... Well, no more! There's no cage that can hold me! I'm bustin' outta here. Here's the plan. Just after the morning scrum meeting, you throw a paper airplane to distract the guard. I'll slip under the raised floor. I've got a plastic spoon from the break room, so I'll dig a tunnel. If we do this every day for the next 40 - 50 years, we'll make it out!

    --
    After exhaustive research and excrutiating analysis, I've determined that Bubba is, in fact, everywhere.
  25. Great Potential by sparrowhead · · Score: 1

    Given the recent events on the financial markets there's great potential to expand that model to the stock and finances trading sectors. At 25c an hour even Bernie Madoff might repay his debts on day

  26. Re:Skills...and a sat image of FCI Elkton! by zill · · Score: 1

    You can't really blame him; the recidivism rate is 67.5% after all.

  27. they can bust them down to janitor work or food se by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    they can bust them down to janitor work or food services.

  28. Watch for India's prison population to grow! by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Slave labor, just like the good old USofA!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  29. Prison planet by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    more than just a website... People will find security there... They won't mind at all... In fact you will find them trying to break in.. Hey free cable!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  30. Inmates watching TV all day is better then them pl by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Inmates watching TV all day is better then them planing to brake out / making shanks.

    and there was something about that in time magazine.

  31. Giving prisoners sensitive information? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    So we have some prisoners and we want them to get some skills for when they leave prison.

    Make them work?

    Great idea!

    Doing data entry?

    Ok, I guess since they'll be low paid.

    For banks?

    Wait a second... For banks? So we'll have prisoners handling massive amounts of banking data?!!! Something tells me this won't end well. For the banking customers, that is. It might end very well for the prisoners (some side cash "earned") and Radiant (cut costs means bonuses for management).

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  32. They just want the $75 - $200 jail costs more then by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    They just want the $75 - $200 jail costs more then that to lock some up for 30 days.

  33. let them sell risky mortgages by glebovitz · · Score: 1

    After all, everyone else in the risky Mortgage business should probably be in jail.

  34. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    I sort of agree with this. The purpose of prison is to rehabilitate and keep dangerous people locked away from the rest of society. Televisions and books are pretty minor expenses to keep them pacified.

    Now, unlike free society, whatever they got to watch would be censored all to hell and back if I had a say in it (things like Prison Break and The Anarchist's Cookbook would be off the menu for sure), but I'd wager that most wouldn't mind having access to watch something like PBS, the History Channel, TLC, Discovery, etc.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  35. Because punishment should never stop by abulafia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    IMHO, any felon should be stripped of their MCSE, or any other IT or engineering certification, and not allowed to get another for at least 10 years after release ... 10 years of scraping sidewalks on the outside!

    And you'll ensure that people who offend will go on to reoffend, and your precious tax dollars will go to keeping them locked up and and a net cost to everyone (instead of using that MCSE to stay out of jail, pay taxes and make the world a better place).

    The single worst thing you can do to encourage someone to go straight is to remove hope that they can improve their lot. Hey, if you just got out and your lot was to scrape sidewalks while also dealing with the stress of caring for yourself with no hope of improving things, why the hell not reoffend. If you don't get away with it, your job doesn't suck any less and you don't have to worry about rent, and your life is already ruined, so fuck it.

    It boggles the mind that some folks are so completely stupid about things like this the minute the word 'criminal' is uttered. And that's before we get to all of the inequities of our criminal justice system and the institutionalized perverse incentives _not_ having to do with Skapare's apparent personal interest in wasting human capital, increasing misery and wasting their tax money in order to keep people from earning an honest living.

    --
    I forget what 8 was for.
    1. Re:Because punishment should never stop by loraksus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But it's more fun to get all angsty and put other people down! We feel better about ourselves! We have a purpose!
      But if we think things through logically, it's like our lives are meaningless :'(

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:Because punishment should never stop by dontbgay · · Score: 1

      I've heard this sentiment before. All I've got to say about that is: You frame your own life. If you leave it up to someone else to make a man out of you, you'll never be a man. Not to get all hippy-tastic on you or anything, but anyone with the complaint of their life being meaningless should probably reevaluate their life. They're doing it wrong.

      --
      Sig not found.
  36. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

    They used to spend lots of time lifting weights too. Even criminals are getting fat and lazy

  37. > The feds have NO interest whatsoever in providing skill training, no matter what their propaganda tells you. At the FCI where I was, inmates typically slept till lunch, signed false pay sheets claiming 40 hours worked. They thought they were getting over, but it's actualy the feds, who can provide "proof" of "gainfully employed inmates."

    > But it's a scam. The BOP/DOJ has a vested interest in the 75% recidivism rate..

    It's used as a scam. That doesn't mean it *is* a scam. If justice knew how to lower the recidivism rate 50%, they would do it. Maybe you think they wouldn't, but realize you're seeing it from a very different POV than they are. The inside of a prison doesn't work the way that the people at Justice wish it did, and most of the exposure you get in a prison or as an inmate to people from Justice, or Feds, or even regular cops, is them trying to entrap guards or prisoners into drug deals, or the typical confession scenario. Places where cops act essentially as Judas Iscariot, as a betrayer, because that's what they're trained to do and it's what works in the short-term. But just because they betray doesn't mean they mean evil because of some screwed up incentive structure to want more money for Justice.

    Maybe it's a scam for BOP, something they can sell the politicians. When you work in the field a long time, you get used to the recidivism rate, and think most people, you can't really do anything to help. But that doesn't mean they *want* that recidivism rate. There's enough bad sh*t in the world that if all the recidivists went away, you'd still be able to argue for more money for justice than the budget they have now, and there'd still be reasons for it. We have hundreds of thousands of american teens at high risk for being actually enslaved every year, with the human trafficking problem. (Sources: The Polaris Project, River of Innocents, Victor Malarek's The Natashas). Kids who survive hell and get back up again and build their lives. Children who can't build their lives because they've never known a family and they never learned how to build themselves up. There are more than enough problems for Justice. The day there's no more need for the DOJ is the day the DOJ employees have their biggest freaking party ever.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:No. by AndersOSU · · Score: 1

      Lowering the recidivism rate is easy, it's just not politically viable. See, any politician who wants to put ex-cons in community colleges, spend money on drug treatment, and have job placement programs, and lowering or eliminating sentencing for non-violent drug offenses is both fiscally irresponsible and more importantly SOFT ON CRIME.

      To the average voter, every penny spent on rehabilitating prisoners while there's a pot hole on my street is a penny wasted, but every dollar spent on incarcerating degenerates is keeping us safer.

    2. Re:No. by makomk · · Score: 1

      To the average voter, every penny spent on rehabilitating prisoners while there's a pot hole on my street is a penny wasted, but every dollar spent on incarcerating degenerates is keeping us safer.

      Interestingly, the same is true in the UK... but only for male prisoners. The press have kicked up quite a bit of fuss about female prisoners, the lack of decent rehabilitation for them, increase in numbers due to the government's insistence on being "tough on crime" etc - and the government jumped. Female prisoners are getting smaller units with more facilities for rehabilitation, while the increase in the number of male prisoners is being handled by building bigger and more dehumanizing prisons. (Of course, there were even serious suggestions in tsome of the newspapers that women shouldn't be locked up at all.)

    3. Re:No. by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 1

      If justice knew how to lower the recidivism rate 50%, they would do it.

      They do know. It's called job training.

      Back in the day when Johnny Cash played at Folsom Prison, almost every man there was in school or learning a trade. And once they got out, the majority of them never came back. Today, there are only a handful of classes, with waiting lists more than 1,000 long, and the three-year recidivism rate is 75 percent.

      We know how to make the system much better. Job training, ending the War on (Some) Drugs, and taking mental health seriously would slash recidivism, lower crime, make our streets safer, and generally improve the quality of life for all Americans. We just don't care to do it.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  38. plenty of crimes aren't crimes by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    such as prison for marijuana use: that's stupid

    however, i'm kind of sick of this tired line: "The US has 3% of the world's population and 25% of it's prison population. Numerically and per capita, we have the highest prison population on the planet"

    the reason i'm sick of this line is that other countries aren't going "oh my gosh, what is wrong with the usa! so many people are in prison there!"

    what those other people in other countries are saying is "man i'm thick of these thieves and murderers running around free. we need to crack down in these elements ruining our society"

    in other words, other countries aren't bemoaning our high prison rates, they're bemoaning the thieves getting away scott free in their own country. high prison populations aren't necessarily a bad thing, assuming the laws make sense. it could just mean you have an efficient police and judicial system (relatively speaking), catching more crooks

    lower prison populations in other countries in other words, isn't some sign of tolerance or enlightenment, its a sign of a corrupt and inefficient police/ judiciary. in those other countries with lower prison populations, you are simply talking about more assholes getting away with robbery and murder and walking around free

    other people in other countries are actually envying the usa's high incarceration rate

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:plenty of crimes aren't crimes by zarzu · · Score: 2

      the reason i'm sick of this line is that other countries aren't going "oh my gosh, what is wrong with the usa! so many people are in prison there!"

      yes we are.

      what those other people in other countries are saying is "man i'm thick of these thieves and murderers running around free. we need to crack down in these elements ruining our society"

      no we're not.

      in other words, other countries aren't bemoaning our high prison rates, they're bemoaning the thieves getting away scott free in their own country.

      no we're not.

      other people in other countries are actually envying the usa's high incarceration rate

      no we're not.

      cheers from europe.

    2. Re:plenty of crimes aren't crimes by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    3. Re:plenty of crimes aren't crimes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      high prison populations aren't necessarily a bad thing, assuming the laws make sense. it could just mean you have an efficient police and judicial system (relatively speaking), catching more crooks

      Are you seriously saying that it's a good thing if a large portion of the populace commit crimes? You don't think there's something wrong with society, if many people resort to crime?

      I don't think any Europeans envy the high incarceration rate since they don't think locking people up is the solution. The solution is to fix what causes people to commit crime since then you not only reduce the number of prisoners but also the number of crime victims. A crime not committed in the first place is much preferable to a crime committed and solved.

  39. what is your accent? by way2trivial · · Score: 1

    I've never met a southerner who couldn't understand me, because they all watch television.

    (me- California beach raised-now living on the other coast)

    I've met many throughout the south, some of whom I could not comprehend because of their accent.

    and I think only off the really beaten path down swamp roads in LA once did I ever meet someone who didn't comprehend me better than I did them... *(and I had no French to use)*

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  40. What could possibly go wrong? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    There's absolutely no chance that convicted criminals would misuse data... I'd trust them completely with my credit card numbers!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  41. this is the start of a new era by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of silicon shanks and other stabbing devices made from computer parts.

  42. This is India by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, the prisoners get nothing, the jailers get all the $.

    India is an amazingly corrupt country.

  43. Inmates? by The+Moof · · Score: 1

    The outsourcing centre will handle banking information 24 hours a day using a shift system

    So, let me get this straight. They're knowingly, willfully giving my banking information to known, convicted criminals for processing... This can only end well.

    1. Re:Inmates? by Dzonatas · · Score: 1

      Not all inmates are criminals. Not all criminals are inmates.

  44. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by WCguru42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (things like Prison Break and The Anarchist's Cookbook would be off the menu for sure)

    Maybe the second one, but really, Prison Break. Do you really think that escape plan would work in real life?

    --
    "Educate the mind but never at the expense of the soul."~Blessed Basil Moreau
  45. US prisoners by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    Yes, industry programs in some prison systems in the US pay as little as $0.25/hour for labor, but there's a bigger factor going against the possibility of insourcing here: many prison systems limit inmate access to computers, to keep them from getting access to porn, general outside communications, and contact with victims or witnesses.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  46. The future of salvery by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 1

    Once the entire prison system is privatized, those "high wage" jobs will disappear as prisons become the 21st Century plantations. At that point, someone in Silicon Valley will have developed a way to automate prisoners' jobs, and the private prison system will go bankrupt. We will need to bail them out for fear that they go out of business and release all their 'customers.'

  47. Durable Hardware by Dzonatas · · Score: 1

    One thing overlooked above, being mainly about skills, is what the effect this will have on hardware. Prisons are known to have people who are upset about being in jail and surely the hardware needs to be durable enough to handle the risk of being handled very rough. There have been devices designed to project a screen onto any surface with smart optical devices to read touches against the image, so I'd imagine such a system boxed into protective transparent window to project and get feedback from any surface inside a cell could be a means to salvation for inmates. There isn't enough options in jail, as people probably think only bad criminals are in jail, which is not true when we include the mass amount of civil jurisdictions and those held merely due to court proceedings and both possibly have never done anything criminal. This could lead to more communication with inmates, which would lead to greater justice. If you ever witnessed how all inmates in the jail process get treated nearly the same, being criminal or non-criminal, I'm sure you agree that my use of "would" is not merely a made-up prediction. Durable hardware is needed in a cell that contains either criminal or non-criminal inmates. It's bad enough there is non-criminal inmates and a better system doesn't exist to give them swift and appropriate justice due to lack of technology and communication available inmates.

  48. They better not have the lifers write novels by modulo · · Score: 1

    They'll die before they finish their first sentence.

    --

    ...but the language is MUMPS, which I will not utter here

  49. hello europe by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    might i introduce you to these amazing places called africa, south america, asia? or did you think comparisons to europe was the only thing that mattered?

    additionally, i don't think you're the right voice to represent the reality of crime in europe. you enjoy your coffee and brie in your upper middle class enclave, meanwhile, i'll walk around the block, to some neighborhoods you never go to and never think about, and i'll listen to what the voices i meet there say about criminality and the police in europe. how does that sound darling?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2009_French_riots

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_civil_unrest_in_Villiers-le-Bel

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_civil_unrest_in_France

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:hello europe by zarzu · · Score: 1

      ah yes, because you broadly refer to just any "other country" you can now tell me that i don't live in the only other country, ah how smart. but no matter where i live you could tell me that, so clearly it's not an argument. you on the other don't even live in a single one of those other countries and the upper middle class enclave hits you right back. you think the neighbourhoods around here are in any way worse than your slums? don't be ridiculous.

      i am surprised that you didn't list the greek protests, they're so current! but you know, those unrests that you list, are a tiny percentile of what is considered crimes, they really don't tell anything at all. especially since americans can't even get out of their apartments to cause unrest because they're too fat. even the army is desperately looking for halfway fit people nowadays. but enough with my prejudice. we still think you americans are bonkers over here and since politicians are middle and upper class, you'll have a hard time finding the voices of a country tell you about those neighbourhoods i never go to.

  50. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    Not at all (well I guess not. I've never even watched it). I just don't think it's a good subject matter for them to be watching. Whatever they decide to do, they'll likely get caught if they try to break out. In that regard, regardless of feasibility, you won't want anything that might embolden them to TRY breaking out in the first place.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  51. Re:They just want the $75 - $200 jail costs more t by canajin56 · · Score: 1

    It costs the taxpayer more than that. It makes the privately owned prison a boatload of cash, though.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  52. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sort of agree with this. The purpose of prison is to rehabilitate and keep dangerous people locked away from the rest of society.

    If you're writing from within the borders of the United States, you're mistaken. The current purpose of prisons is to punish and dispose of people. American society isn't interested in reform anymore.

  53. What happens to those prisoners when they get out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They'll work in big souless data centers where they will be treated like less than dirt. Soon the prisons will be overcrowded as people commit crimes to get a better working environment.

  54. Gee, I can't see what could possibly go wrong! by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    This has success written all over it.

  55. DEY TOOK ER JERBS!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are going to put all of our American prisoners out of work too....

  56. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1
    Penitentiary
    Definition Penitentiary: a place for imprisonment, reformatory discipline, or punishment, esp. a prison maintained in the U.S. by a state or the federal government for serious offenders. Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/penitentiary
    Root Word: Penance
    Definition Penance: a punishment undergone in token of penitence for sin. (Source: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/penance)

    The reason for a penitentiary is to make people sorry for doing something wrong to remind them not to do it again. If they were really set up to do that still, they would remove all TVs, weight rooms, suspend privileges, and impose hard labour, and corporal punishment. They would make prisons a very bad place to be so that criminals would try hard not to go back. But society is full of people who can't seem to take responsibility for their own actions any more and want to sue everyone instead of taking their lumps. Of course to maintain and justify this type of thinking, they push their thinking on others including how prisons are run now.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  57. cheap outsourcing opportunity missed during WWII? by wardk · · Score: 1

    seems a bummer for the Germans that there was no IT outsourcing market during World War 2, the west would likely have simply done business with them.

  58. I guess it's pretty sad.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..that I find this HIGHLY unsurprising..

  59. you have a lot of hate in you by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    you would fit in well at a tea party rally here in the usa

    when you get over your superiority complex, get back to me, then there might actually be a chance of some sort of communication

    until then, you're a sad pathetic example of what is wrong with this world, europe, the usa, or anywhere else: all reactive, defensive prideful posturing in defense of your little tribe

    fuck the usa, i don't care about the usa. or europe. fuck them both

    i was attacking a failure in logic: that somehow the rest of the world is happy they don't have the jail occupancy rates of the usa. but go to your average brazilian favela, and you might find a different opinion of what the ideal prison population rate should be. in other words, most people in this world think the ideal incarceration rate is much higher than it is in their country currently, from seeing all the criminals running around. that most countries in this world, the low incarceration rate is due to a corrupt or apathetic police and judiciary, not some sort of enlightenment or tolerance

    that's my thesis. would you like to take issue with the concepts? or would you like to engage in some more mindless ethnocentric tribal chest thumping that doesn't prvoe me wrong, but only proves you are as hopelessly provincial as sarah palin or any other arrogant american neocon?

    xoxoxoxoxoxox

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:you have a lot of hate in you by zarzu · · Score: 1

      since the first post you have been generalizing that other countries do not do this and wish that and blah. now you tell me that you just meant those countries with a corrupt or apathetic police. and of course i will agree to that, it's not even a question whether that is the case in some countries. but you did not make this point, not even close. you generalized it to just any other country like the sentiment did that you didn't agree with.

      then you linked to riots in france somehow implying that it shows how the french don't incarcerate enough people and wish they would be as "tough on crime" as the us. so you wanna tell me that the french police forces are corrupt etc etc? come on.

      you could have argued your "thesis" like in the last reply from the beginning but you chose not to. you chose to ridiculously imply that the population of all the other countries look up to how tough the us is and silent wished that they would incarcerate as many people as them. that you're projecting the superiority complex and defensive pride that you displayed in your first post on to me is quite funny. i don't have a reason to defend anything of mine here, i live in switzerland, we really don't give a shit about the rest of europe. you will have a hard time finding any riots or unrests in the past years and believe me, even though we have some discussions on handling immigrants, swiss people do not wish to have the overfilled american prisons.

      have a good one

  60. Can't Wait Till... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...one of these prisoners figures out how to get access to the web, then starts doing bad things online. "We're tracking the hacker now!! Wait for it...waaaaiiittt for it! Got him!" "Where's he at?" "Um, he's already in jail, boss..."

  61. cheap labor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From the start the industrial revolution flourished because of sweatshops and cheap labor. Strong unions provided some relief but we are returning to those days rapidly.

    "If the world operates as one big market, every employee will compete with every person anywhere in the world who is capable of doing the same job. There are lots of them and many of them are hungry." - Andrew Grove, president of Intel Corp., in his book High Output Management

    "The recent quantum leap in the ability of transnational corporations to relocate their facilities around the world in effect makes all workers, communities and countries competitors for these corporations' favor. The consequence is a 'race to the bottom' in which wages and social conditions tend to fall to the level of the most desperate." - Jeremy Brecher, historian and author

    "To achieve maximum profits these transnationals will stop at nothing. After all, they are non-human institutions that must expand through ever-greater profits, or go out of business. In so doing they have shown willingness to violate human rights - particularly workers' rights - to throw millions out of work, eliminate unions, use sweat-shops and slave labor, destroy the environment, destabilize governments, install or bolster tyrants who oppress, repress, torture and kill with impunity." - Karen Talbot, Backing up Globalization with Military Might, 1999

  62. it costs as much as $40K to jail someone... by swframe · · Score: 1

    Some one commits a crime, does time and the tax payer pays an enormous bill. In many cases, the person gets to hang out doing nothing; That doesn't sound like punishment especially when the person was living a very dangerous life outside. For the very poor, prison can be much better than their home environment. I think we should require companies that outsource manufacturing to china to use prisoner labor instead such that the prisoner is able to pay the cost of incarceration. In return, the prisoner should be allowed to work for additional income which can be used to buy get better conditions (less crowding, better health-care, better food and education). Prisons could turn inmates into productive workers at almost no cost to the public. Why are we sending billions to china to make plastic toys at the same time we're spending billions for prisoners to do nothing; it is incredibly wasteful for the taxpayer.

    1. Re:it costs as much as $40K to jail someone... by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      Ugh! So you'd like to see the prison system turn into a for-profit venture, would you?

      Others think like you do, and those systems quickly become corrupted. That is, when it becomes profitable to keep prisoners, prisoners are found regardless of any laws having or having not been broken. As somebody else noted, real criminals don't have skills, so suddenly skilled workers, (like you?) become coveted commodities. And now that everything is a crime, you can be legally shunted off to the slave mill on a whim.

      Think it won't happen? It already is happening. It'll be bitter justice when it happens to you. When an economy crashes and lunatics are in charge, nobody is safe, so don't you dare feel smug.

      -FL

  63. Wait... What?! by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Indeed.
    http://blog.ju29ro.com/uploaded_images/hooligans-reuters-735894.jpg
    http://www.ilga-europe.org/var/ilga/storage/images/europe/photo_galleries/budapest_pride_5_july_2008/budapest_pride_2008_hooligans__5/70616-1-eng-GB/budapest_pride_2008_hooligans.jpg
    http://www.awitness.org/eden2003/kosovogenlg.jpg
    http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/images/paris_riots_day_9.jpg

    What the fuck are you rambling about?
    Are you actually equalizing legal police actions in western Europe during civil riots with homophobic fascists' organized attacks on gay-pride marches and examples of Serbian war crimes in Bosnia?
    As a reply to a comment disagreeing with OP's (somewhat delusional) idea of the stance Europeans have regarding USian prison and legal system?

    What the fuck have you been smoking and why aren't you sharing with everyone?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  64. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    They tried that approach already. The results were pretty bad for the guards and even the prisoners.
    And no better for society.

    If they really wanted to bring down prison rates, they would legalize pot and allow use of other harder drugs in a controlled locations (with stiff penalties for selling/using them outside of those locations).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  65. Indian Justice Motto 2.0 by FrankDrebin · · Score: 1

    "Not To Be Doing The Crime, If You Can't... Type At Least 50 WPM"

    --
    Anybody want a peanut?
  66. Remember that... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    ...next time someone compares Chinese and other sweatshops with slavery.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  67. where did the chip on your shoulder come from? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the colossal need to judge?

    the oh-so-telling preemptory defensive stance "we really don't give a shit about the rest of europe". oh really? that's why you needed to preemptively defend europe from my global pronouncements? pfffffft. you obviously care a lot. that you need to say you don't shows your insecurity

    you know, there's a funny guy from one of the countries near you, austria, by the name of freud, who started this funny field of inquiry called psychoanalysis. he would have a field day the way you practically fall over yourself, hopelessly and hilariously revealing your various inadequacies and inferiorities in spite of your sputtering attempts at superiority to them

    and finally, i think a fellow swiss would be horrified at you, that such a small little angry insignificant person should assume that they speak for switzerland on the international stage about anything. when clearly you only speak for a small cold little pathetic bitter hate that has nothing to do with switzerland, europe, or even the usa, only your own poor character. i see nothing of a swiss character about you or what you say. sorry switzerland: what went wrong with this one, huh?

    oh well, i guess every country needs a bottom of the bell curve

    hugs and kisses!

    (snicker)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:where did the chip on your shoulder come from? by zarzu · · Score: 1

      hey this has been some impressive trolling, but since you didn't even pick up on the freudian projection that i already wrote about in my last reply (but instead felt like you have to now point me to him), i will stop here.

  68. human nature is human nature by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    this is flat out wrong: "The solution is to fix what causes people to commit crime"

    what causes people to commit crime is the same thing that causes anyone of any socioeconomic background, from any walk of life, any culture, any country, any time period in all of human history to commit crime: failure of character

    its a constant. crime always happened. crime will always happen. crime is never going away. its simply a maintenance function of society to clean up and lock away their bad seeds. there's a core amount of people who need to be locked away, in any society, or any time period, now and forever. not locking this group away simply means they commit more crimes

    there is no cure for crime. some amount always seem to choose to commit crime. unless you want to propose we transgress against the concept of free will, you need to accept that there will be some who choose badly, and consequences must exist for that after the fact. there is no cure for that, ever

    your current understanding of human nature is woefully naive

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:human nature is human nature by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Evidently you haven't studied psychology. Now, some people are simply born flawed and incapable of feeling empathy but everyone else is on the border. The "core amount" you refer to - if you by that mean people that will inevitably commit crimes - is tiny compared to the total number of criminals. Criminologists often say that everyone is a murderer that just hasn't committed their first crime yet and it's more about understanding the circumstances than the individual when assessing whether someone was capable of what they're suspected of. But whilst investigations solve individual crimes, for preventive purposes it's more important to understand what causes more people to commit crime. For instance, under what standard of living do survival instincts surpass morals? And what effect does the environment then have? Do people in poorer countries commit less crime than people with a higher standard of living, if the poorer encounter less extreme income differences? Is a higher likelihood of getting caught but shorter sentences a better deterrent than longer sentences when the likelihood of getting caught is higher? The latter is very interesting if you have a fixed budget and need to allocate it between the police force and the prison system. In practice there are of course many more variables to consider, such as social services, public education etc.

      But I'm putting pearls before swine, if you talk about "failure of character" since the only correct observation of yours is that some people have always committed crimes and you have no idea of the scientific knowledge that has been attained by those who have studied why.

    2. Re:human nature is human nature by Black+Gold+Alchemist · · Score: 1
      Says the poster with:

      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it

      as your sig. Crime will never go away, but you can reduce it.

      And since you violate intellectual property law, aren't you a criminal?

      --
      Responsibility is an addiction
      Virtue is a temptation
      Community is a cartel
  69. Happened before. by Max_W · · Score: 1

    When a slave labor is used on a massive scale there will be a pressure on police and courts to provide qualified people into the system not just some bums unable to work well.

    It was the case with the GULAG. Thieves, crooks, etc. are what they are because they cannot and do not like to work.

    It is not that difficult to get an engineer or a skilled worker into a jail, since about 50% of prisoners are locked up due to an error anyway.

  70. White collar crime. Maybe Taxes to be exact. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1
    4 years, Federal...white collar crime.

    You either got nailed (rightly or wrongly) for embezzlement or some other breach of fiduciary law or taxes.

    I'm leaning towards taxes.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  71. Sick. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    So how many times in that 4 years did you have to pay for rent, food, clothes, medical care, dental care, etc.? I think if you take all that into account, it far exceeds minimum wage. A good friend of mine spent 10 years in prison and commented shortly after his release that his standard of living was higher while inside.

    You are arguing in favor of Slavery. And that's not the problem. The problem is that you accept this happily. That's the problem.

    And when looked at in microcosm, your brand of asshattery does make a sick kind of sense. But only fools and retards look at parts of the system out of context and draw conclusions from that point. The system as a whole was engineered so that populations will accept such insane ideas as rational.

    Poverty is the reason for most so-called criminals being in prison, and Poverty is the default position for most people today because it is enforced through deliberate economic warfare and psychopathic deeds performed in government and banking. The end result is a means of having interment camps at arms length without having to take direct responsibility for putting them there.

    There's a reason the U.S.A. has the highest rate of incarceration per capita in the industrialized world.

    -FL

  72. The mythbusters have tested stuff that works unlik by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The mythbusters have tested stuff that works unlike that prison break plan.

  73. Hey, they are talking about us... by Neanderthal+Ninny · · Score: 1

    2.25 per hour. On a set salary and then do "overtime" and taxes and other government "fees", benefit and it almost becomes that amount per hour. The only thing missing the body cavity searches.... hold it, they already to that to look for anything you take from work.

  74. Badge of shame by dugeen · · Score: 1

    Any UK company using these services should be forced to prominently include the fact in its advertising.

  75. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

    Yeah... I'm talking about how they did things 100 years ago. Seems to me people had a lot more respect for each other back then. Mind you, back then parents would discipline their children if they disrespected ANYBODY. Bottom line is when there are significant consequences to your actions (you are held severely accountable for what you do), people behave more. Besides, I don't give a shit what the prisoners feel like in prison. I want them to feel bad. If they riot and cause destruction in the prison, shoot them. On the spot. The others will stop rioting right away. If they hurt a guard, kill them right on the spot. Why do they have rights? They decided to live outside the law, now pay the consequences. When you get out, you won't want to go back.

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  76. Re:Inmates watching TV all day is better then them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've never seen the show, but guys in prison have most of the day to sit around and think of how to get out. My mother in law works in a prison and they had one guy escape out the front door. He worked in the area where they would sew new prison outfits and repair old ones. The guard outfits were brown, so there was no other brown cloth on the premises. So this guy smuggles out bits of extra cloth over months, working stitching together his own prison uniform. Then he steals old tea bags (or coffee grounds) out of the kitchen and used them to dye the cloth in his toilet.

    This guy managed to make an entire properly colored guard uniform, including patches and emblems, using trash and extra cloth. When he made his move, nobody realized he wasn't a guard, and they buzzed him right out the front gate.