Slashdot Mirror


Asus Budget Ultraportable Notebook Sold Sans OS

EconolineCrush writes "Tired of paying the Windows tax on notebooks? Asus's Eee PC 1201T budget ultraportable comes without a traditional operating system and sells for only $380. The 12-inch system has promising specifications, sporting an Athlon Neo processor, Radeon HD 3200 graphics, Bluetooth, and 802.11n Wi-Fi. It weighs just 3.2lbs with a 6-cell battery and can even handle light gaming duties. However, battery life in Ubuntu is considerably shorter than it is under Windows. Are there any better options for would-be laptop Linux users?"

263 comments

  1. $380? by Reason58 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Didn't they sell for less than that WITH an OS a year ago? Does "netbook" not mean what I think it means (cheap, low power, long battery life, not a desktop replacement)?

    1. Re:$380? by Pojut · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I dunno, man...a 12" screen is really pushing the definition of "netbook". Then again, it is refered to as an ultraportable notebook, not a netbook, so...

    2. Re:$380? by dward90 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Netbook" probably means exactly what you think. "Notebook," however, which is what TFA is about, is a different term.

      --
      My other sig is clever.
    3. Re:$380? by Culture20 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ultraportable notebook=/=netbook. Netbooks are passe now that we have iPads. PCs are passe now that we have iPads. Thinking for oneself is passe now that we have iPads.

    4. Re:$380? by therealobsideus · · Score: 1

      TFA describes it as a notebook for the most part, aside from it's Eee branding. The Slashdot post says notebook. Where in the hell did you get netbook? :P

    5. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heterosexual intercourse is now passe now we have iPads.

    6. Re:$380? by lemur3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought the same thing. $380? Too much!

      I remember when the eeePc's and other netbooks started coming out for sub $300 prices that it wouldnt be long before we would see $150 netbooks... But I guess that isnt what happened because netbooks seemingly get more and more expensive.

      Where are the cheap netbooks that I thought were the intent of the product?!

    7. Re:$380? by Moblaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It sold for less last year because of Microsoft contractually restricting the CPU power and specs of WinXP netbooks. Cause Microsoft does not like netbooks. Because they are supposed to be cheap. And Microsoft don't do cheap.

      Now as for power issues in Linux: please RTFUPMDFAOTWAKSAM ("Read the f-ing Ubuntu power management documentation found all over the web and kindly stop annoying me")

    8. Re:$380? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      http://www.cherrypal.com/secure/index.php

      Right there. Yeah, might be crap, but sure is cheap

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:$380? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing.

      Also why would I pay $380 for an OS-free netbook when hhgregg has one for sale at just $275, and Windows Seven is included free.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    10. Re:$380? by hansamurai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft convinced the manufacturers that they needed to run Windows, so any kind of ARM support was dropped with that, along with the likelihood of a cheap netbook.

    11. Re:$380? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's also a scam.

    12. Re:$380? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      But...but... with that netbook you are paying the Microsoft tax... wait you say it's 100 dollars cheaper?

    13. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 12" screen is probably more expansive than a 8.9" one.
      The Athlon Neo CPU is probably more expansive than an Atom, but also more powerful. Same for the graphic chip.

    14. Re:$380? by theaveng · · Score: 2, Funny

      CherryPal? Is that like the PearPods on iCarly? i.e. non-existent

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    15. Re:$380? by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Probably because the $380 NOTEBOOK in question here isn't a netbook. It's got a 12" screen. It's got a full keyboard. It's got much better integrated graphics. It's light.

      We're talking more in the range of a 12" MacBook here rather than a netbook.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    16. Re:$380? by Professor_UNIX · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just buy the Eee PC 1005PE. I don't regret my purchase for a second and a 10+ hour real-world battery life is absolutely beautiful on a netbook. I wouldn't even consider a laptop or netbook with a pitiful 5 hour or less battery life these days. The whole point of a netbook is portability and that means not being shackled to an AC power outlet to power or recharge your laptop all the time so why wouldn't you pick the netbook with the most battery life?

    17. Re:$380? by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Hm, odd most of the major tech blogs have said something about Cherry Pal's products, but yeah, seems scam-like enough. Plus they have a crap site. If they really did ship those things on time they wouldn't be too bad for small robotic projects.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    18. Re:$380? by BigFootApe · · Score: 1

      I believe what we're seeing a coalescing of different pressures keeping prices high, including customer wanting Windows, substantial market requirements for CPU power (higher resolution media playback, etc), some key applications not currently available on ARM, marketing channels not setting appropriate expectations vis-a-vis product capabilities. I also believe existing hardware suppliers are somewhat reluctant to race each other to the bottom in pricing and margin.

    19. Re:$380? by Noitatsidem · · Score: 1

      flamebait much? Don't feed this troll.

      --
      Feel free to mod me down, just know that unlike some Anonymous Cowards I'm not afraid to express my views as myself.
    20. Re:$380? by lemur3 · · Score: 1

      isnt a netbook an ultraportable notebook? if not....where is the line and how can I be sure which is which without the marketing speak applied to a products name?

    21. Re:$380? by codepunk · · Score: 1

      I am not sure about the asus netbook but I bought a aspire one last month for $280 with windows 7 installed. The asus has more ram but I am perfectly happy with my purchase.

      --


      Got Code?
    22. Re:$380? by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Funny

      Now as for power issues in Linux: please RTFUPMDFAOTWAKSAM ("Read the f-ing Ubuntu power management documentation found all over the web and kindly stop annoying me")

      PUSABYATLAATCOORISATFO/.

      ("Please use shorter acronyms because yours are too long and annoy the crap out of reasonable individuals such as those found on slashdot")

    23. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Agreed.

      I purchased a similar machine around christmas for about $300: Gateway LT3103u - Athlon 64 Ultra low Voltage L110 processor, Radeon x1200 graphics, 11.6" 1366x768 display, 2 GB RAM, 160 GB HD, 6 cell battery, WiFi, Bluetooth, and it came with Windows 7 Pro...

      So how is paying more $ to not have the OS included a benefit for me?

    24. Re:$380? by theJML · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, personall 12.1 is kinda big for a netbook, but then I though the line was closer to 8"... I guess the only thing that makes the difference is the processor now-a-days. However, to narrow it down further, I believe you should run it though the flow chart found here:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/03/13/miniature_computer_field_guide/

      --
      -=JML=-
    25. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 12" screen is probably more expansive than a 8.9" one.

      Yeah, being "more expansive" is the definition of a 12" screen compared to a 8.9" one.

    26. Re:$380? by aBaldrich · · Score: 1

      For all slashdotters sexual intercourse is passe now that we have iPads.


      WAIT...

      --
      In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    27. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heterosexual intercourse is now passe now we have iPads.

      Homosexual intercourse is still okay though.

    28. Re:$380? by smbarbour · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can quote me on this: "The iPad will never reach full market potential as long as people cannot play FarmVille on it."

    29. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL .. esp "Thinking for oneself" - great humor.

      Some just seem to miss it, so subtle.

    30. Re:$380? by gambino21 · · Score: 1

      From what I understand a lot of PCs with Windows can sell for cheaper than the base cost of the system. The reason is that they are effectively subsidized by the pre-installed thirdparty spam-ware. The thirdparty software vendors pay to have their applications pre-installed which covers the cost of the windows license plus a little bit extra. So the only way a linux or no-OS computer could be cheaper is if they also had a similar deal.

    31. Re:$380? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      If only there was such long-lasting netbook with a clit... ;/

      Portability when it comes to battery life, and in a cheap package, is here already. But I have this dream of being able to play Diablo2 in a cathedral during organ concert, on a cemetery during the night of 1st-2nd November, or in a train compartment (especially with some nouns present). Only clit or mouse would be sufficient; and mouse is mostly just luggable, not fully portable... ;/

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    32. Re:$380? by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

      Now as for power issues in Linux

      But Microsoft OSes don't need this sort of tweaking, and it's one of the things Ubuntu was supposed to get away from; requiring end users to be more knowledgeable than they have to be. Why isn't there an expert system in the power management options app that will change these settings according to users' wishes?

    33. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're content with WinCE and Linux (i.e. ARM processors), there's some netbooks regularly available "on sale" under $100.

      I haven't seen _anything_ x86 under $160, but if you shop about you can frequently find barebones Atom netbooks for about $200, and if you can still find an old Celeron-based one (like the original Eees), they go between $160 and $200.

      Then, of course, you have things like this, that are kinda splitting the difference between the old-school thin&lights (which you usually had to import from Japan, and were north of $1000) and netbooks; you get better-than-netbook performance, a slightly larger-than-netbook screen, netbookishly lightweight, but somewhat less portable, and it costs about the same as a top-peg netbook, or double a cheap netbook.

      I for one like where they're going with it -- such machines (besides being interesting in their own right) reduce the pressure on the netbook market to move into bigger screens, fatter keyboards, and power-hungrier CPUs.

    34. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reasonable individuals such as those found on slashdot

      WTF?? What /. are YOU reading?

    35. Re:$380? by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Could the lack of $150 netbooks have something to do with the lack of cheap RAM and other parts? I remember getting 4GB of DDR2 RAM for $50. I bought 3 sets in different months. Now that same RAM is $90+. That is just one example. Maybe the cost of the parts went up and that made everything else go up?

    36. Re:$380? by HereIAmJH · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Where are the cheap netbooks that I thought were the intent of the product?!

      Well, we lost the NET in netbooks. Like others have mentioned, they started pushing them as desktop replacements with faster processors and Windows. Also, somehow netbooks got defined as sub 12" displays with 160+ gigabyte hard drives. Netbooks were supposed to be small, light, and with a long battery life that ran simple applications and connected to the Internet. And wifi is being replaced with 3g for web access so that cell companies can sell contracts.

      I'm still using my eeePC 701 (right now, actually) and storage space and processor speed has never been an issue. I have a few 2g SD cards, and some thumb drives but rarely use them. I use the Internet for storage or my server when I'm home. My only complaint with wifi is I wish I had an external antenna jack. If I want 3g, I'll break down and finally buy a smart phone. With a little tinkering a Droid can provide a hotspot, so no need for a contract just for the netbook.

      OTOH, I would be much happier with a larger display and keyboard. A 12" version of the 701 would be considerably larger, but not much heavier. There are just too many sites that don't support small displays. Even slashdot has some issues.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    37. Re:$380? by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      Would be great to have a kernel-powermanagement in the Ubuntu repository. I'm not using LFS or gentoo specifically because I hate fucking recompiling my kernel.

    38. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course.. its an Apple product.

    39. Re:$380? by mirix · · Score: 1

      I've got an old thinkpad X41 and it has pretty decent life, I'd presume the newer ones are better yet. Of course, they aren't cheap.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    40. Re:$380? by gcalvin · · Score: 1

      Why isn't there an expert system in the power management options app that will change these settings according to users' wishes?

      Because you didn't write it yet.

    41. Re:$380? by pspahn · · Score: 1

      Funny, but a good point nonetheless. "Netbooks" were doomed from the beginning with the name. It's too general and subjective.

      At first glance, when I saw "Ultraportable" I thought 7-9" screen. Of course I deemed that instinctual response on thinking it's smaller than a netbook. It is a better name from the standpoint that it better defines the product's size, but who cares?

      Apple is in the business of household names. Of course they'll do their damndest to define a type of product for the next generation or longer. I guess that means the marketing teams getting left behind end up coming up with some new product that sounds like everything not Apple.

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    42. Re:$380? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      And it's hard to justify that expense for a machine which I consider to be way overkill, as far as performance expected from an untraportable goes (which works against battery life / necessitates larger batteries). Getting which would be also wasteful on most general terms (resources, etc.)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    43. Re:$380? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      No it actually happened over lunch at a tradeshow.
      There was even a slashdot article at the time about an ASUS manager praising the linux eeePC before lunch and making a public apology for it not being a Microsoft system after a meeting with Microsoft representatives. I'm sure ASUS got a pretty good deal somewhere or got to keep the volume pricing they had. It's not conspiracy, it is what happens when deals with suppliers can change.
      It's a pity really because although fans of various linux distros criticise the linux distribution that was on the eeePC it is actually quite good and only suffers from a lack of updates.

    44. Re:$380? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Get a MacBook/MacBook Pro with 10 hours of battery life on a freakin' full size laptop.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    45. Re:$380? by ggarron · · Score: 1

      Yes, I also think it is not a netbook, but is better than one. I might buy one, but I am not thinking about buying a netbook (too hard to work with such small screen) http://g.garron.me/slashdot-asus-budget-ultraportable-notebook-s My opinions about this article.

      --
      Guillermo Garron http://www.go2linux.org
    46. Re:$380? by mjwx · · Score: 1

      PUSABYATLAATCOORISATFO/.

      SWALALABANEASWASTY.

      (Stop Whinging About Long Acronyms Like A Baby And Never End A Sentence With A Slash Thank You).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    47. Re:$380? by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft convinced the manufacturers that they needed to run Windows, so any kind of ARM support was dropped with that, along with the likelihood of a cheap netbook.

      It would be more truthful to say that when the Atom netbook running Win XP hit the shelves, sales of the Linux netbook tanked.

    48. Re:$380? by crazycheetah · · Score: 1

      Slashdot works amazingly well on the Droid's browser. I've used it a couple of times, when I was bored at work. Not that it means anything for any other particular dislay or your overall point...

    49. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait, reasonable individuals ? On /. ???
      I must've missed something.

    50. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see a reason to mention ARM either: AFAICS cheap XP was the deciding factor. It will be interesting to see what happens now: MS is dragging the price to the sky with Win7 and the manufacturers start having a meaningful choice again: Put out another netbook with Windows or the same thing a bit cheaper with Meego/Moblin/whatever it's called today...

    51. Re:$380? by Fri13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Netbook is just a nickname for the sub-notebook category.
      Netbooks idea was to have a 7-9" screens with good resolution (from 720x480 up to 1024x600). So you can just have very basic functions with you. Weight being less than 800g and battery time about 10-20 hours (depending the screen being a black/white or very little power usage).

      Bad thing is just no one really wanted to take out the netbook as there was a need. They pushed normal LCD monitors to them, a Intel Atom what eats the battery and over few gigabytes for storage.

      Now "netbooks" are notebooks. Thanks to Microsoft what wanted to come to markets and drive Linux away from markets so people would not start using different UI's what would drive them to alternatives from Windows in the end.

      From smaller to bigger
      Cellphone (some are called as "smartphones")
      PDA (already replaced by "smart"phones and MID's)
      Sub-notebook (Netbook trend should drop here)
      Notebook
      Laptop
      Desktop computer .... ....
      Supercomputer

      Many would buy a 150$ computer with at least 10-15 battery time, very lightweight, small storage space (4-12Gb) and good connectivity (only a WiFi/3G, who wants to have a RJ-45 on cellphone? just as example).

      But problem is that if it does not come with Windows, Microsoft will drive you away with all possible ways. If you dont have Office or IE on it, many people will turn away.

    52. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK First off 380$ is not cheap. It still too expensive for us poor IT People to afford.

    53. Re:$380? by Fri13 · · Score: 1

      There is clear line between Sub-notebook and Notebook class. The "Ultraportable notebook" is like Netbook... a Sub-notebook class. But they are just marketing tricks for consumers to sell them something "new". Every year you need to get somekind new "trick" to sell old stuff as a "new innovation".

      The netbooks just are today (since 8,9" screens) in notebook class, not in sub-notebooks class.The screen size is one what rules, but not the only one. And MS wanted to push the limit so up that Windows can run on it. So we do not anymore get any sub-notebook classes computers.

    54. Re:$380? by FatherDale · · Score: 1

      Funny, but a good point nonetheless. "Netbooks" were doomed from the beginning with the name. It's too general and subjective.

      I'm replying to this from one of the four netbooks in my house, so I'm getting a kick....

    55. Re:$380? by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Thinking for oneself is passe now that we have iPads.

      Is the correllary true, Those who can think for themselves, don't buy an Ipad?

    56. Re:$380? by jplopez · · Score: 2, Informative

      Every time you say "what" instead of "that" God kills a kitten.

    57. Re:$380? by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

      Why isn't there an expert system in the power management options app that will change these settings according to users' wishes?

      There is in Mandriva/KDE. Maybe Ubuntu isnt that good?

      --
      **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.
    58. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reasonable individuals such as those found on slashdot

      Please don't insinuate untruth.

    59. Re:$380? by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

      It works for everything but moderation in MicroB on the N900. (In retro mode - I hate modern slashdot).

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    60. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, except there's no such thing, because real world MacBook pro battery life is around 5 hours, maybe 6 if you don't actually do anything with it except leave it turned on.

      The ASUS NetBooks really do manage 10 hours of actual real usage battery life, rather than bullshit marketing battery life as in most laptops, including MacBook pros.

    61. Re:$380? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Don't be ageist a twelve inch netbook over a 10 inch netbook provides 20 percent easier readability and in the case for many older geeks it is not so much a matter of choice but of necessity. What ever happened to that quick injection that was going to regain lens flexibility and ultra portability back "in reach" (arm length joke for those in the know) of the visually aged.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    62. Re:$380? by random+string+of+num · · Score: 1

      TFA says notebook, i.e. a laptop, (but don't put it on your lap or you'll sterilise your little solders with the heat)

      a netbook is the small cheap low power device which you are thinking of.

      this is a subtle distinction to do with marketing

    63. Re:$380? by theaveng · · Score: 1

      The screen is 2 inches smaller, but otherwise it has identical functionality, plus it includes Windows for free and a $111 rebate.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    64. Re:$380? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      A netbook is a compact laptop that used to sell for $2000 but now sells for $400.

      Been there. Done that. (twice)

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    65. Re:$380? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      I bought an Eee Seashell about 3 weeks ago at Newegg fcor $269 with W7 starter

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    66. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what god exists.

    67. Re:$380? by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      but it comes with Ms-Office time-bomb version and a whole whack of junkware that the laptop mfr get PAID to install it.
      That shovelware is where they get the $100 "saving"

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    68. Re:$380? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      But if you're planning to replace it with Linux, who cares?

    69. Re:$380? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Of course, most Linux distros come with a lot of junk you don't want too, but the third-parties are subsidizing it because they have no money.

    70. Re:$380? by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      Slashdot works amazingly well on the Droid's browser.

      The front page and articles work reasonably well (retro mode), with the exception of when comments get threaded too deep. If you start going into user info though you start running into things like the right column overwriting the center column and save boxes being off the bottom of the screen.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    71. Re:$380? by westlake · · Score: 1

      MS is dragging the price to the sky with Win7 and the manufacturers start having a meaningful choice again

      WalMart will sell you an eMachine dual core Intel 15" laptop with 64 bit Win 7 Premium, a DVD burner and 3 GB RAM for $380. For $30 more they will throw in an HP multifunction printer.

      WalMart currently stocks - 1 - netbook for in-store sale.

      This tells me that netbook sales have taken an artic plunge in deep-discount retail.

    72. Re:$380? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but really cheeses me off is that netbooks lost the consumer battery AA AAA option.

  2. "Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 0

    What does that even mean?

    1. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by amRadioHed · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hi, you must be new. Welcome to the interweb! When you see underlined text on a "web site" you can "click" on the words to get more information. In this case if you clicked on "comes without a traditional operating system" you would have learned that "Asus ships the Eee PC 1201T with only its ExpressGate instant-on OS". Isn't that neat? Have fun!

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by joeflies · · Score: 1

      Traditionally, laptops and netbooks come with an operating system of some sort.

    3. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 1

      Sure. However, "traditional" implies there is some category of "non-traditional" that carries with it some quality that sets it apart.

    4. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 0, Redundant

      How is that OS different than a "traditional" operating system?

    5. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Jorl17 · · Score: 3, Funny

      One that's old, stupid, popular and yet used by millions of people.

      --
      Have you heard about SoylentNews?
    6. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is that OS different than a "traditional" operating system?

      You're kidding right?

    7. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by MBGMorden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It means Windows. That's the main headline without saying it outright: this notebook is being sold without Windows.

      Any other questions?

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    8. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Expressgate is to traditional OS as Knara is to traditional human being. Expressgate can do simple things, like browse the web, but is incapable of more advanced tasks, similar to how Knara can (apparently) browse the web, but fails at more complex tasks like thinking.

    9. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On a traditional operating system, you can run a compiler.

    10. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      When you consider my old computers came with a OS on bios that booteed instatly and dropped you ito a prompt, ExpressGate is quite the definition of the "traditional" OS.

    11. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      How is that OS different than a "traditional" operating system?

      I'd challenge you to make your point, and be direct about it. You're leaving the reader to guess, but even on this site you're wrong to assume that we'll all jump to the same conclusion that you did.

    12. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Instant on... It's on a chip, not the drive. It's paired down and loads quick but would be a pain to use all day for all your computing needs.

    13. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I understand that you are being purposefully obtuse to make a point. There is a quality that separates Windows from non-traditional operating systems. Market share. People "traditionally" bought PCs with Windows on them. This doesn't follow that tradition, and thus either has no OS or a non-traditional one.

      It looks like you are fishing for some deeper meaning, and it isn't there. The statement is 100% correct, and your feigned confusion could have been mistaken for real the first post, but when you continue to work very hard to be purposefully obtuse when people clarify indicates you are asking questions for rhetorical reasons, and not because you want an answer.

    14. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by hey! · · Score: 1

      One that, in Winston Churchill's immortal words, runs on "flogging, grog and sodomy." ... No, wait. That was the Royal Navy.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 1

      Obviously. Just wondering why they even bothered with the pretense, since the euphemism is semantically problematic.

    16. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 1

      An interesting idea (and so far the most intelligent reply to my question).

    17. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 1

      Not at all. They use "traditional operating system" to mean something (even though they're very obviously trying to avoid saying "without Windows"). I want to know why they used that term instead of the plainly obvious, obfuscated meaning.

    18. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 1

      Instant on... It's on a chip, not the drive. It's paired down and loads quick but would be a pain to use all day for all your computing needs.

      You can embed many operating systems (including Windows). Does that make them then "non-traditional"?

    19. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Knara · · Score: 1

      But you fail to see the point. The phrase "without a traditional operating system" is very different than "without the traditional operating system."

      I'm curious as to why they even bothered to say anything but "without Windows" when they clearly meant "without Windows".

    20. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you fucking stupid? Jesus.

    21. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by moogsynth · · Score: 1

      I'm curious as to why they even bothered to say anything but "without Windows" when they clearly meant "without Windows".

      Because netbooks are also sold with Ubuntu or Xandros installed on them. Netbooks are commonly sold with instant-on environments and a general purpose operating system on the hard disk. But hardly ever are desktop computers and laptops sold with nothing on them at all except for an instant-on operating system environment. Hence the use of the term "traditional".

    22. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      OK, so EMACS is a 'traditional Operating System"?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    23. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But you fail to see the point. The phrase "without a traditional operating system" is very different than "without the traditional operating system."

      You seem to have a problem with understanding that I can see your point, understand your logic, and yet still disagree. If I'm in a one-car-family and I get ready to go to the store and someone calls after me "are you taking a bus to the store?" I could answer "No, I'm taking a car." This word usage distinguishes one method of transport from another without regard to whether there is "a" car or "the" car. The same is happening here. For whatever reason, they decided to distinguish between "traditional OS" and "non traditional OS" without regard to the fact that there's really only one "traditional OS." Apparently, you disagree with that choice. And, for whatever reason, you have determined that your opinion as to their construct being incorrect is not an opinion, but fact, such that anyone not agreeing with you must be because they "just don't understand." I understand and disagree. From the other responses, they understand and disagree as well. Your personal opinion on their wording is not fact. Even if technically incorrect, it is not ambiguous to most people. And, you've had it explicitly explained to you and you state you understand what they meant (thus it was not ambiguous to you either) but that you disagreed with their wording.

      I'm curious as to why they even bothered to say anything but "without Windows" when they clearly meant "without Windows".

      I'm curious whether you realize you are a troll. You posted a question that you obviously thought would gather responses, then disagreed with all those who responded. You didn't ask a question to get an answer, but instead asked a question to get responses and attack those who do respond. That meets the definition of a troll. Perhaps, next time you could just state your opinion, rather than questions that look contrived to convince people that your opinion is a correct fact. "I think their wording is bad." There, was that so hard?

    24. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      "traditional operating system" sounds like install media that will run on most motherboards over many generations of hardware.
      Think of the new OS efforts linked to hardware like web 2.0 ready TRON idea
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TRON_Project
      Some may recall the 'TRON was once killed by the former Minister of International Trade and Industry, Hashimoto, because he was at that time under the pressure of United States" part too.
      The world has seen efforts to remove the MS tax and the swift MS response over many years.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    25. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Yes, if a computer came with an instant-on and read-only version of Windows I would consider that non-traditional.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    26. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Albanach · · Score: 1

      No, you forgot how contraposition works.

      a => b
      !b => !a

      So:

      Traditional OS => Run compiler
      !Run compiler => !Traditional OS

    27. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you just want an OS that's old and stupid, try Linux!

    28. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Linux kernel is the OS after all just like computer science has proofed. And you can run compiler on it even when using the ExpressGate. But who would tell that to GNU and get killed because there is no such thing as GNU/Linux OS?

    29. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      The guy has a 4 digit id. He can be anything but new to the interweb ;-)

      What people *mean* by traditional OS is the OS that dominates the market and it is expected by the average computer user: windows

      Of course I don't agree with this definition and I guess that's the case with Knara also, which is the whole point of his the question anyways...

      --
      -- dnl
    30. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      I can't decide if this reply if funny or trollish.

      --
      -- dnl
    31. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      It's not nice to call Jesus stupid. God.

    32. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish someone had pointed that out when I first started reading slashdot, i initially thought the summary was the article...

    33. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Albatrosses · · Score: 1

      Contraposition only works with "if and only if", aka <=>. Otherwise I could say "If it's a Toyota, then it's a car. If it's NOT a Toyota, then it's NOT a car".

      So I think what you meant was:
      Traditional OS <=> Run Compiler
      !(Run Compiler) <=> !(Traditional OS)

    34. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure by traditional they don't mean Windows, they mean an OS installed an a hard disk with a normal boot procedure which you can install and run your own software on. This system comes with a instant-on, read-only OS with a limited set of apps that can't be changed by the user.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    35. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by danieltdp · · Score: 1

      Looking back at TFA, I guess you are right.

      --
      -- dnl
    36. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Albanach · · Score: 1

      Contraposition only works with "if and only if", aka . Otherwise I could say "If it's a Toyota, then it's a car. If it's NOT a Toyota, then it's NOT a car".

      No, it doesn't require if and only if. Your logic is wrong.

      Toyota => car
      !car => !Toyota

      You need to flip and negate. You only negated.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraposition

      p => q
      !q => !p

    37. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Albanach · · Score: 1

      replying to myself, the person with the emacs comment flipped but didn't negate. With the toyota example you negated but didn't flip. Both need to be done to make the logic correct.

    38. Re:"Traditional Operating System" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so EMACS is a 'traditional Operating System"?

      Well, there are many who would say so ...

  3. And... by Nomaxxx · · Score: 2, Funny

    It Also Comes Sans Serif.

  4. Is that any of your business? by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Yes, I have a large budget for my anus. But is that any of your business? I think not.

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    1. Re:Is that any of your business? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I have a large budget for my anus. But is that any of your business? I think not.

      http://www.thescambaiter.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109

      is this a pun on the above? If so, well done.

  5. ExpressGate/Splashtop by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How well does that built in micro OS really work? Seems like for a lot of folks that might be all the "OS" they really need.

    1. Re:ExpressGate/Splashtop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      F***ING express gate !
      how do they work ?

    2. Re:ExpressGate/Splashtop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What "micro OS"? In ExpressGate there is a Linux OS. It is a monolithic OS and far from the "micro". In fact, there ain't OS as "micro". There are only microkernels but they are just part of the OS, when OS other parts (modules/servers) are standalone (do not mistake them to daemons).

      In Linux, nothing is "micro". Just bloat old monolithic OS structure what was designed in 60's. And that is compliment, because Linux works.

  6. -1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Fuck you for even bringing up the fucking iPad.

    1. Re:-1 Offtopic by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Didn't you hear? Fucking is passe now that we have iPads and freedom from porn.

    2. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that!

      Oh, wait, I'm a Slashdotter. It doesn't matter than fucking is passe.

    3. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm like the one guy on here who gets laid regularly, you insensitive clod!

    4. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you...

    5. Re:-1 Offtopic by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Freedom from porn? I thought that was freedom of porn. What else are those motion sensors for?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    6. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, I get laid regularly. Well, not for the past couple of weeks. Which means that, uh, well...

      Damn.

      One guy it is.

    7. Re:-1 Offtopic by zdepthcharge · · Score: 0

      porn was escaping steve caged me with iPads and now I am free

    8. Re:-1 Offtopic by zdepthcharge · · Score: 1

      Oops I ****ed up my formatting and ruined my haiku...

      porn was escaping
      steve caged me with iPads
      and now I am free

    9. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never again those Jobs then, I hear.

    10. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Both Fucking and iPads are passe now that we have 3D porn ;-)

    11. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the second guy, you insensitive clod!

    12. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you hear? Freedom is now passe now that we have iPads.

    13. Re:-1 Offtopic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see iCame, the porn-only iPad.

  7. Creating something is passe by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Netbooks are passe now that we have iPads. PCs are passe now that we have iPads.

    Actually creating something is passe now that we have iPad. Go and consume, consume, consume.

  8. Sans deputy by tepples · · Score: 1

    It Also Comes Sans Serif.

    But it does not come sans deputy.

  9. It means the operating systems your ancestors used by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  10. Re:Battery life issues will be fixed in upcoming r by Jorl17 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Darn, my last mod point just went away! Someone up him with informative, please!

    --
    Have you heard about SoylentNews?
  11. When will netbooks... by Dishwasha · · Score: 1

    support more than 2GB of RAM? Add any OS and the memory hungry Firefox and I'm already out of available RAM and the netbook is performing like crap.

    1. Re:When will netbooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Dude, $10 4GB SD card from NewEgg. ReadyBoost. LEARN.

      ReadyBoost has been around since Vista and makes my 2GB Netbook fly.
      IDE, Firefox/Thunderbird, Notepad++, Pandora, etc at the same time? No problem.

      For Linux I think there's a way to use a card as a RamDisk, which is the same idea.

    2. Re:When will netbooks... by Narishma · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's a limit imposed by Microsoft. Or at least that was the case when netbooks came with Windows XP, now that they use Windows 7 I don't know if it's still the same. Basically there was a list of specifications the netbook should not exceed if the manufacturer wanted to get Windows at a reduced price. The ones I remember are 1 GB of RAM max and no more than a single CPU core. I think the hard disk capacity and the screen size were limited too.

      --
      Mada mada dane.
    3. Re:When will netbooks... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      When will people just use more efficient software?...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:When will netbooks... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Huh? what? are you kidding? my everyday PC is an ASUS B202 just as it shipped, it's hanging on the back of a Samsung 19" monitor and it does everything admirably, maybe if you stop playing everquest or warcraft or trying to impress the other cranky little boogers in your CS class you'll realize that you don't need a liquid cooled 6core 64bit processor with 16g of RAM and a terabyte of onboard HDD space!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    5. Re:When will netbooks... by acheron12 · · Score: 1

      I await the year of Linux on the Slightly Better Netbook.

      --
      there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
    6. Re:When will netbooks... by ckaminski · · Score: 1

      I know. remember when WindowsNT 4.0 and Mosaic/Netscape ran awesome in a comparatively paltry 128MB of RAM?

    7. Re:When will netbooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're thinking of Intel:
      http://www.google.com/search?q=intel+atom+screen+ram+restrictions

    8. Re:When will netbooks... by Narishma · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Mada mada dane.
    9. Re:When will netbooks... by cynyr · · Score: 1

      With only one ram slot this is almost 100% a cost issue, 4GB dimms are a lot more than 2GB ones.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    10. Re:When will netbooks... by cynyr · · Score: 1

      you're right, i only need 8gb of ram. Really, try encoding 1080P h264 for a ps3 sometime and then let me know how fast that atom feels. Or compile software or edit movies. Yep that nettop would work just fine for getting to facebook and IRC.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    11. Re:When will netbooks... by Pherlin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Readyboost helps but is not a pancea. It certainly helps with smaller accesses (low latency) but fails at larger ones (low bandwidth.) That said, I run Readyboost on all my Vista machines and it definately helps, even on the machines with 4GB. But it's not a full-fledged substitute for more RAM.

    12. Re:When will netbooks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, if you go for last years def of the limits.
      Currently, that is not the case
      "Netbook manufactures won’t be forced to cut down version of Windows 7 as Microsoft has allowed the netbook manufactures to install any version of Windows 7 in the netbooks as per their wish."

    13. Re:When will netbooks... by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Ya know, i'm starting to get sick of all of this firefox trash talking. I dunno. I've been running this instance of firefox on my IBM ThinkPad X31 for a few days, plus vlc playing some family guy, on arch linux and I don't notice all of these memory issues you dudes keep talking about. It doesn't seem sluggish. It's fine. This laptop is fucking at least 5 years old, I bough it used for like 100 bucks back in '07. Maybe you dudes just don't know how to keep your system running effciently, and it's not firefox?

    14. Re:When will netbooks... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Then you must remember when websites were more text than flash/pictures/videos. But yeah, blame it on the guy who wrote the browser...

    15. Re:When will netbooks... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      It's usually the same guys that have 60 extensions running and enough toolbars to cover half their screen while running 6 youtube music videos in separate tabs.

    16. Re:When will netbooks... by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Only when talking about MS is an optional discount considered an imposition.

    17. Re:When will netbooks... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      Most people might re-compile some QT5.0 avi's to mpg2 (I do and it works fine) and compose documents, etc, all of which is just great on my "nettop". Once again you are confusing a task-specific workstation with an every day PC.

      Kids!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    18. Re:When will netbooks... by sznupi · · Score: 1

      The browser?...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    19. Re:When will netbooks... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Dishwasha (OP) was specifically talking about Firefox.

  12. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  13. Re:It means the operating systems your ancestors u by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ancestors didn't use NT, you insensitive clod!

  14. This will definitely kill the iPad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Consumers will finally be able to install what every Linux distro desired in order to write code, inexpensively.

    Yes, I'm being sarcastic.

  15. Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these... by g0bshiTe · · Score: 3, Informative

    Debian Eee
    Gentoo Eee
    EasyPeasy
    Ubuntu Of course Ubuntu has a Eee flavor of the kernel, I chose to go a full blown Hardy Heron install on my netbook. I was given mine by a friend who was gonna throw it away. I removed the Xandros that was on it and installed Ubuntu and other than a bit of fun hacking around with it, it's quite useless other than using the terminal. Firefox on the web with it is crap, no memory whatsoever so if you have more than 1 tab open it takes forever to do anything. Forget about compiling something while websurfing cause that won't happen. My advice to people thinking about getting these, for the price if you double it, you get a pretty kick ass laptop these days. Go for the laptop, more power, more space, more ram, more CPU, more functional!

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  16. I want a small power supply, not a good battery. by leuk_he · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand why there are no laptops with a small power supply and (barely..) no battery.
    95% of my laptop work is close to a socket and to a wifi internet connection. The trouble is that most laptops i used until now do not have a small power adapter. You still have to lug a considerabele power supply.

    Battery is useful, but i could live without, and it would shave a small amount of the price and weight. And with a modularised design it could just be an other option.

  17. But what about linux? by w0mprat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seriously. Why didn't they just dump something like vanilla ubuntu on the laptop? At least it would have something on it. If it's being sold without an OS, presumably it's being sold to someone who knows how to install. Even Asus' Splashtop would have been good.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    1. Re:But what about linux? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      One possibility comes to mind.

      Ubuntu is supposed to have a shorter battery life on these specific units than Windows. The attached article on the subject claims just under 2.9 hours for Ubuntu and 4.2 hours for Windows 7.

      So, if they put Ubuntu on it, they'd have to quote the Ubuntu battery life (they could probably call it a generous 3 hours and get away with a bit of market fluffery).

      By not putting an Operating System at all on it, they can validly quote the Windows battery life numbers, and say the battery lasts "well over four hours!(*)"
      (*) When using Windows 7.

      Note: I have an Asus eeePC (one of the ten-inch models) that came with Windows 7 Starter. It's currently running Linux Mint 8 and the battery life is pretty close to the claims they made with Windows. I had to use the Lucid backports to do it, but oddly enough the version of Ubuntu they used *is* Lucid for this review. It could be that Ubuntu is not properly identifying these units yet and isn't doing as good a job as it could be with the battery.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:But what about linux? by jgardia · · Score: 1

      After some tests I found that my battery in Kubuntu lasts about 15% more in my Thinkpad X61t (vs Ubuntu).
      I'm not sure why, but that was also visible under powertop (10-15% less power consumption).

    3. Re:But what about linux? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      bah, i don't trust their unbuntu battery life. They installed a Desktop version of unbuntu, and made no attempt to conserve battery, they switched the profile on windows to "auto". They would at least have run powertop and pressed the keys, and then tested. Thats not even including things like screen brightness, or a properly working wifi driver. So I call shananigins, although i guess ubuntu could ship with some sort of "power" profiles, but that would confuse the unbuntu users.

      user1: "why is my desktop slower in linux?"
      guru1: "did you set the power profile on install to 'low power'?"
      user1: "yea, what should that matter?!! it should know that when i try to watch a movie and it drops frames it needs to turn the power back up!!!"
      guru1: "/facepalm, you need to change it if you want it to not conserve power. Also why don't you set it to 'mildly conservative' as the help text suggests?"
      user1: "I'M BEING GREEN! AND STUFF, DOES UBUNTU CONTAIN ANY ANIMAL PRODUCTS OR CFCs?"
      guru1: "..."

      and thats how it would go down with most of the ubuntu users i know. Now don't get me wrong, ubuntu is a great gateway Distro, but it would be a good idea to look outside of it for a change. maybe the netbook remix even.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    4. Re:But what about linux? by ZosX · · Score: 1

      Low power mode in windows does the same thing. In fact I have it set to throttle my cpu to 50% or 1ghz so I can squeeze the battery some more.

  18. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by BenFenner · · Score: 1

    While I don't share your desire for an integrated power supply I can relate to someone who doesn't find current products that fit their needs (I'm the same way with cell phones and other items). I imagine the heat created is a big factor. You know how blisteringly hot those power bricks get? Stick that into the laptop case and all of a sudden you've doubled or tripled your cooling needs.

  19. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by Carrot007 · · Score: 1

    > My advice to people thinking about getting these, for the price if you double it, you get a pretty kick ass laptop these days. Go for the laptop, more power, more space, more ram, more CPU, more functional!

    More missing the point?

    --
    +----------------- | What is the question!
  20. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by Walter+White · · Score: 4, Informative

    If lack of RAM is the problem, then install more RAM. I upgraded my Eee 901 to 2GB of RAM and that brought total cost up to $300. It allows me to use RAM for /tmp which makes it not nearly so sluggish. Firefox is still problematic. I think it does a lot of disk writes and that causes unacceptably long freezes on the Eee so I use Chromium (on Ubuntu.)

    I don't do compiles and I certainly would not recommend it for a desktop or laptop replacement, but when I travel it meets my needs for browsing, email, loading podasts on my Sansa and occasional word processing and presentations.

  21. Freedos in Thailand by Santzes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here in Thailand, or at least in Chiang Mai, most of the computers and laptops I've seen come with FreeDOS preinstalled. If you don't want to install an OS yourself (and don''t prefer Freedos ;) you can just leave the new computer to the shop and pick it up with a OS of your choice a few hours later for a dollar or two extra install fee + price of the OS.

    1. Re:Freedos in Thailand by sznupi · · Score: 0, Troll

      That's also quite common throughout large areas of ex-Soviet Block. From bigname manufacturers, too.

      And don't tell /. fairytales about "a dollar or two extra install fee + price of the OS"; typically those OS installs are not licensed.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Freedos in Thailand by mjwx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here in Thailand, or at least in Chiang Mai, most of the computers and laptops I've seen come with FreeDOS preinstalled. If you don't want to install an OS yourself (and don''t prefer Freedos ;) you can just leave the new computer to the shop and pick it up with a OS of your choice a few hours later for a dollar or two extra install fee + price of the OS.

      This happens a lot in SE Asia. I've found DOS and NO OS PC's in Pantip Plaza Bangkok (Spelling? then again there is no direct letter translation between Thai and Latin) and Low Yat Plaza in Kuala Lumpur. Officially most stores cant sell pirated Windows and the cost of Windows Starter adds a significant amount to the cost of a 6000 Baht when many locals will have a hard time getting that amount of spare cash together. Most people just get a pirated version of Windows for 40B off the street.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    3. Re:Freedos in Thailand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Price of the OS being 100 Baht, or they ripped you off.

  22. The Beauty of Not Selling an OS . . by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    . . . is not having to support an OS. I bet they start losing money as soon as the phone rings.

  23. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    95% of my laptop work is close to a socket and to a wifi internet connection.

    A lot of restaurants provide free Wi-Fi but don't have any customer-accessible power outlets. And not everybody requires the Internet all the time; some laptop users (such as myself) can get work done while commuting on a bus, train, or carpool.

  24. It has Splashtop by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even Asus' Splashtop would have been good.

    From the article:

    Asus ships the Eee PC 1201T with only its ExpressGate instant-on OS, which provides Internet access, web browsing, and other basic functionality.

    The impression that I get from this Wikipedia article is that Splashtop and ExpressGate are one and the same.

  25. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by bendodge · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My Eee PC 1005HA has a very small brick. It's a little wider and taller bigger than a Zone candy bar and about as long. It also has very long battery life. The only problem (as mentioned below) is that it gets really hot (~7 Amps), probably because of the small surface area.

    --
    The government can't save you.
  26. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by initdeep · · Score: 1

    some netbooks had soldered in ram which prohibited simply upgrading it.
    The original Dell mini 10 for example.

  27. Used laptop by InlawBiker · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I just bought a used Thinkpad T42 for $150 and put Ubuntu on it. It has an actual screen, keyboard, wifi and 40gb hard drive. It even has a supported 3d card so I can do the whizzy 3d desktop thing.

    There are lots of offloaded business class laptops out there that run Linux great. They're usually very well built and full of Intel parts, which have solid Linux drivers.

    1. Re:Used laptop by roc97007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's true, especially in this economy. Find the company that gets all the now-useless hardware from companies that have outsourced their IT. Hardware up to three years old, but still good by today's standards.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  28. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by sznupi · · Score: 1

    You know, other solution would be to install software which makes more efficient use of available resources...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  29. Computers should be designed for an OS by Burz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But the fact that this is rarely the case for any Linux-based desktop system tells me why power-saving and other (usually audio) features don't work well.

    Its interesting that most of the (few) brands that work well with a distro like Ubuntu off the shelf also tend to be companies that offer certain models with Linux pre-installed. They're not like Dell, who will design a prototype from available components, then go to the component OEMs and say "We're making 2 million of this new system, but some of your chips come with standard features we'd rather leave out or fudge in software... chop that stuff off your chips and drop your price if you want our business".

    Of course, the Linux drivers tend to be written for the OEM originals with their standard features intact, not the funky special-request variations made by Dell, Acer, etc. for their budget models.

    What this translates into is that Johnny is perplexed as to why Linux has poor "PC compatibility".

    Someone (that means us) needs to start insisting on systems that were designed with Linux or preferably a popular landmark distro like Ubuntu in mind. And we need to stop setting our friends and colleagues up for failed experiments when handing them discs expecting they can just run it on their PCs; It reflects badly on our judgment as individuals and on free open source software in general.

    1. Re:Computers should be designed for an OS by hitmark · · Score: 1

      i dont think its so much about things being designed for a os, as it is about there being drivers written that know how to trip all the power saving options when told to do so. Linux devs, unless informed by supplier of hardware, have enough trouble getting the basics working. And its not helping when motherboard companies (like say foxconn) put basically messed up ACPI data into the bios for some reason or other.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:Computers should be designed for an OS by Burz · · Score: 1

      I agree that drivers and access to hardware specs are critically important.

      However the system developer culture may be at the root of why the whole Linux desktop/laptop thing doesn't work for most people --that includes highly technical people like me who can't recommend something like Ubuntu to most other people we know because of the software's shortcomings.

      Few Linux devs fail to recognize most of the software that defines the core system (from a users POV) as actual system software. Instead they relegate most of that stuff like file managers to the "application" category. As a result, most of the burden for vertical integration is placed near the top of the software stack, on people who have little if any pull with the "real" Linux devs lower down the stack. Designers, who would be in charge at Apple and Microsoft, are relegated to the status of whiners in the FOSS OS world. The result is a very slipshod, inconsistent environment from the POV of both the end user and the typical app developer.

      Video, audio, power and Wifi tend to work poorly on Linux-based laptops. These 'consumer' features are hardly ever used by Linux's core audience, the web sysadmins who are usually happy to use Windows and Mac systems to administer Linux servers. Yet plenty of consumer-class hardware types are well-supported by Linux if they overlap with the types used on servers: Ethernet, HD & optical disc for example.

      All of this suggests that the problem lies at least partly within the FOSS community.

      In the case of Foxconn, did the Linux Foundation threaten to drop their motherboards from a list of supported hardware because of the ACPI problem? Oh wait... there's no list of supported or recommended systems. You see-- The Linux devs pretty much believe that a user who is trying out Linux-based stuff can use less than ideal hardware and reap the whirlwind for all they care.

      The Windows landscape is chaotic enough even with all the hardware being officially designed for that OS. Expecting users to cope with Linux-based stuff in that environment is downright cruel.

    3. Re:Computers should be designed for an OS by Xamusk · · Score: 1

      Buying a Linux-based laptop doesn't get us free from driver troubles. Once I bought an Acer laptop with a Linux-that-nobody-uses, and even from factory the webcam wouldn't work because it didn't have proper drivers. Luckily enough, I just had to wait a few months before smart people made an experimental gspca driver for it.

  30. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by natehoy · · Score: 1

    Exactly.

    Converting a certain number of watts from AC to DC generates a certain amount of heat, and you can only improve the thermal efficiency of the inverter to a certain degree, then it starts getting more expensive very fast.

    The smaller they make the power supply that provides a given wattage, the more problems you're going to have cooling it due to a smaller surface from which to radiate the heat.

    Making it internal would be a nightmare, because then all that heat would be contained inside the case when you are trying to use it on AC power.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  31. Which Ubuntu? by loudmax · · Score: 1, Informative

    The article says they used Ubuntu, but doesn't say whether they're using regular desktop Ubuntu or the Netbook remix. They admit that they haven't optimized the kernel: it's entirely possible that battery life could be improved by recompiling the kernel with different flags or some equally esoteric maneuver. Of course normal users shouldn't have to optimize their kernels, but installing the netbook edition shouldn't be that esoteric. The article doesn't say if they did that or not, but if they had, I suspect that they would say so.

    I haven't installed plain Ubuntu in a while, so I don't know if it offers to optimize for netbooks at install time. It would be nice if it did that.

    --
    KTHXBYE
    1. Re:Which Ubuntu? by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      The article says they used Ubuntu, but doesn't say whether they're using regular desktop Ubuntu or the Netbook remix.

      Actually they said they used the "regular Ubuntu edition" rather than the netbook version because the display resolution was close to a normal desktop. I would say any power management analysis they did is next to useless.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    2. Re:Which Ubuntu? by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

      it's entirely possible that battery life could be improved by recompiling the kernel with different flags or some equally esoteric maneuver.

      Or probably not.

      I did Ubuntu 8.04 tuning for low power consumption. My experience might be outdated, but I doubt it. Best I could do was to remove the Ubuntu, install like Xubuntu, then remove some more crap.

      The problem is that the most power consuming device is the hard drive - but few of Linux desktop applications really care what/when/how they write to the disk. That leads to the effect that hard drive pretty much never sleeps.

      After removing the offending applications, one finds that Linux also reads from disk speculatively nor applications have option to prefetch data from disk. E.g. reading a large PDF under Mac OS X, HDD remains silent all the time - under Linux HDD starts on every other page. And even scrolling thorough the document doesn't always help: to cache the data under Linux one has to really PgDown through every single page of the PDF. Likewise none of the Linux audio players has an option to prefetch the MP3s/etc into memory.

      Kernel option are nice and all. But unless applications are implemented with power saving in mind, it's all for naught.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  32. Asus Budget Portable by tronkel · · Score: 2, Informative

    Instead of big Linux e.g Ubuntu etc, try a smaller Linux such as Puppy, http://www.puppylinux.com/ Approximately 100MB and fast.

    1. Re:Asus Budget Portable by dave562 · · Score: 1

      I don't think the size of the distro is the problem. The issue is whether or not the distro properly interfaces with the ACPI and other hardware resources to properly manage power consumption.

    2. Re:Asus Budget Portable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AMD + ATI has been a bad combination for Linux for a while now, bundling it all together in a notebook is not going to make things better. I wouldn't count on more than a silent command line in full power-consuming mode, with this machine. Perhaps the VESA driver might work, but that is expecting too much out of AMDATI any more. I'd be surprised if a variant of Win even worked, without some kind of registry editing and experimental third-party drivers.

  33. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Nowadays, with cheap cellular access, you can have plenty good enough internet "while commuting on a bus, train, or carpool"...

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  34. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    I imagine the heat created is a big factor. You know how blisteringly hot those power bricks get? Stick that into the laptop case and all of a sudden you've doubled or tripled your cooling needs.

    As someone who frequently gets them so hot that the fail-safes kick in - well:

    This.

  35. xf86 ATI Video Driver is the culprit by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Informative

    It unfortunately tries (unsuccessfully) to perform throttling based upon load rather than having discrete under/overclocking modes as the proprietary Catalyst driver does. The result of which is that the GPU always draws excessive amounts of power even when running off the battery. The only real solution at this point is to swap out the open source driver for the ATI proprietary one and then use the "aticonfig" utility to set the power state according to your need at the time. Other non-GPU optimizations can be done as well, however, the power wasting the GPU is doing with the xf86 drivers is an order of magnitude greater.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:xf86 ATI Video Driver is the culprit by makomk · · Score: 1

      Actually, I don't think the version of the open-source ATI driver shipped with Ubuntu has any power saving at all enabled by default. You really need a much newer kernel version than Ubuntu comes with to get the full benefits anyway.

    2. Re:xf86 ATI Video Driver is the culprit by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I tried that on my laptop with an ati-x1200 video chipset. Bad results and 3d acceleration became disabled. Also my ttys terminals failed too with getty. This could be also because of a bad version of Xorg as I ran an update. I switched to fedora as a result. Ubuntu does not like my video acceleration.

  36. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by sznupi · · Score: 1

    Laptops with (barely...) no battery were the norm for many years. Still are, actually.

    And the size of that power supply is so because you want "speed", "big screen", etc.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  37. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use the Atom 270/1GB version of HP's Netbooks on both UNR and standard Ubuntu desktop - sure not seeing your speed problem.

    On it runs full engineering software (full cad system) in a Windows Virtual Machine in VirtualBox running in Ubuntu UNR. AND have firefox open in Ubuntu with several tabs. With a terminal open running ssh back to a home server.
     
      If I need a bigger screen I just hook it up to a monitor and plug in a mouse/keyboard. Or the projector for presentations.
     
    .

  38. Re:Battery life issues will be fixed in upcoming r by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    This is actually better than your usual juvenile AC drivel. Oh, for a mod point...

    Not bad. You have promise.

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  39. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by DrCode · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I may have something similar, an eee 900a with 1Mb RAM and 4Gb ssd. The problem is that not only is 4Gb too small, but it's a very slow ssd, worse than any hard drive. I spend about $50 to replace it with a much faster 16Gb, and installed Ubuntu NBR. It's now quite reasonable for web surfing. Flash movies are slow, but watching video with mplayer or vlc, even full-screen, is fine. It's great for traveling, as it fits in a small shoe bag and gets 3-4 hours battery life.

  40. Excellent analogy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I LOL'd... thanks. XD

  41. The $380 64 Bit Windows Laptop At Walmart by westlake · · Score: 1

    The E-Machine:

    64 Bit Windows Home Premium
    15" 1366x768 Screen
    Dual core 2.2 GHz Intel CPU
    3 GB DDR 2 RAM
    250 GB HDD
    DVD Burner
    Intel 4500M graphics
    5-in-1 media card reader

    eMachines Black 15.6" eME725-4520 Laptop PC with Intel Pentium Dual Core Processor & Windows 7 Home Premium

    The Asus 12 inch Intel-Ion netbook with Win 7 Home Premium is $470 with a one year warranty. ASUS Silver 12.1" Eee PC 1201N-PU17-SL Netbook PC with Intel Atom N330 Processor & Windows 7 Home Premium

    1. Re:The $380 64 Bit Windows Laptop At Walmart by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      You know how much crapware gets loaded on that thing?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    2. Re:The $380 64 Bit Windows Laptop At Walmart by westlake · · Score: 1

      You know how much crapware gets loaded on that thing?

      Microsoft Works, ASUS Super Hybrid Engine, Microsoft Office (60 days trial)

  42. Re:Just pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #32270736! You are mistaken. I have long since forgotten my password, and don't care to rediscover it.

    Love,
    #32269826

  43. Peppermint OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back to the topic...

    Give Peppermint OS a try.

    http://peppermintos.com/

    Built for Speed

    Peppermint OS was designed to be easy on your processor and system resources so you can get going and get things done...

    Lightweight

    Peppermint OS is under 512MB and easy to run as a Live CD or USB. Loads and Shuts down in Seconds...
    User Friendly

    Step-by-step installation, Works out of the box, Easy to Navigate with Automatic Updates....

    Peppermint was designed for enhanced mobility, efficiency and ease of use. While other operating systems are taking 10 minutes to load, you are already connected, communicating and getting things done. And, unlike other operating systems, Peppermint is ready to use out of the box. Why spend hours tinkering and tweaking? Install Peppermint and get going !!

    1. Re:Peppermint OS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahh, stop these peppermint ads, i am sick of it.

  44. Bah! Pay the Windows tax now, or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...pay the Linux Time tax later. Trust me, the Windows tax is cheaper.

  45. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  46. Oh no! What do I do now? by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    if it doesn't have an OS, how do I denigrate its existence?

    signed, /.

    1. Re:Oh no! What do I do now? by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Say it's running GNU/Hurd

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Oh no! What do I do now? by Pherlin · · Score: 1

      I LOLed

    3. Re:Oh no! What do I do now? by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Put down its BIOS! That's basically a mini-OS it uses to boot off whatever storage device is present. And it sucks, too. Hardly does anything. Probably can't even do any networking.

  47. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by M8e · · Score: 1

    Smaller size(volume) does not necessarily mean a smaller surface area.

    Halving the thickness of a normal power brick changes the area very little, and can be compensated by making it slightly wider.

  48. Cheap cellular data in the United States? by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    cheap cellular access

    I happen not to live in such a country. Instead, I live in the United States, where "3G" is how much one would have to spend over the course of four years for mobile broadband service at $60 per month, capped at 5 GB per month. (Right now, my Virgin Mobile phone bill is $80 per year.) Business managers can justify the expense, but I can't, especially when I have to pay another $60 per month for cable Internet at home.

    1. Re:Cheap cellular data in the United States? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Hm, while I am indeed used recently to the concept of prepaid 4 GB for ~$15 recharge, valid two months (and if next recharge will happen before that point, unused "transfer credit" is kept), perhaps you dismiss some sensible possibilites after all?

      Plenty good enough internet "while commuting on a bus, train, or carpool" isn't that painful on the amount of data transferred. Even when I was getting, not that long ago, 250 MB for the price mentioned - with "plenty good enough" we're not talking about anything data intensive after all; some webpages, mail and IM basically. With 3rd party (non adware) IM client plus Opera Turbo now available (with adblocker and plugins/flash disabled...or even images), that's viable even with small amounts of data transferred.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  49. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by wintermute000 · · Score: 1

    Actually you can get a used ultraportable from the CoreDuo generation for same price.
    A bit bigger, a lot more powerful and a real keyboard to boot.

      IBM X60 series used or Dell D4XX series = same price as cheap netbook
      upgrade to 2Gb + 320Gb HDD = same as expensive netbook but full size kb, screen can go higher than 1024x600 (even 1024x768 is a vast improvement considering how most websites are formatted), decent processor in return for less portability.

    I went down this road and am much happier with my X60s than my earlier period with a dell mini 9. You have to optimize the heck out of whatever OS/build you do on netbook (in fact, funnily I found hackintosh build to be 'snappiest') on an atom. However with my X60s (CULV CoreDuo) stock XP, ubuntu, Win7 all fly along nicely. And its still way more portable than say my work 15.4' machine.

  50. Or you can get a full laptop for $400 by golden.radish · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www1.ca.dell.com/ca/en/home/Laptops/laptop-inspiron-1545/pd.aspx?refid=laptop-inspiron-1545&s=dhs&cs=cadhs1&ref=lthp

    Not sure why you wouldn't get an Inspiron 1545. Full XP Driver support, runs Ubuntu or Fedora, or heaven forbid, comes with Windows 7.

    4GB ram, 2.2Ghz dual core, and a 320GB drive for $500, and the 15.6" screen is a WHITE LED backlight.

    The features and prices of that model have been increasing since January 2009, while the price has been the same or lower. Go Dell!

    1. Re:Or you can get a full laptop for $400 by yelvington · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not sure why you wouldn't get an Inspiron 1545.

      Because it's a pain to haul around. Full-size laptops suck batteries. They're heavy and clumsy. A 15-inch laptop seems like a good idea until you lug it around for three or four hours and then sit down in seat 4B on a CRJ. You can't even get a full-size laptop open on your typical crappy airline seat these days.

      Netbooks are great for portability, but their screen size is too small and the squished keyboards suck.

      The advantage of the 11.6 form factor is that it gives you near-netbook portability, but it's big enough for serious work and there's enough space for normal-size keys.

      I have an Acer 1410 in that size. It's great. It makes my 13-inch Macbook feel like a whale. I much prefer it for traveling. In fact, I prefer it, period.

    2. Re:Or you can get a full laptop for $400 by hughk · · Score: 1

      I have an 11.6" 1410T - it is very, very nice but the screen is shite - good definition, LED illuminated but the viewing angle is poor and it reflects everything. It is however wonderfully light, and is reasonably functional with Win 7. If you ask it to do something serious thought, there you can foregt it. Also in its nice and shiny plastic (that shows off fingerprints so well), its a lot more fragile than my Dell in its alloy shell.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  51. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by jwinster · · Score: 1

    I've tried a few flavors of linux on my netbook, and so far the best performer has been mandriva running xfce4. Great power consumption, firefox runs pretty well (some slowdowns with video frames), but most flash sites run just fine. With NoScript and adblock I can do just about anything I need to. Although to be honest, I find my smartphone encroaching on the featureset I used my netbook fore these days.

    --
    Q.E.D.
  52. Re:Just pa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    does that mean that it could both suck and blow?

  53. Better Battery Life with Windows7? by zaivala · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article linked showed battery life using different models of the Eee. Maybe I'm blind, but I did not see ANY listings of battery life under different OS. I know that UNR 9.10 does not get the battery life of ASUS' remix of Gentoo that came with my Eee 901, but the added functionality is more than worth it. I would assume the bloat of Windows 7 would also eat more juice -- or be handicapped, the way the version of XP that came with some 701 and 901s was. I will be upgrading my Eee soon to UNE 10.04 (Ubuntu changed the name, from Remix to Edition).

  54. Knoppix on DVD, better battery than Windows 2K by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi, I've run Knoppix off of a DVD on a laptop with Windows 2K and it had better battery life.

  55. They didn't set laptop-mode on by Syniurge · · Score: 1

    Which is why the battery life sucks on Ubuntu.

    Of course noone will ever read my post, and the misinformed battery life benchmark will stick to this otherwise superb netbook (the Radeon 3200 is millions times superior to Intel IGPs).

  56. In what language does =/= mean not equal? by aoteoroa · · Score: 1

    In java/C/php not equal is expressed as !=
    In Visual basic you might say "not equal to"
    In SQL you would use <>
      =/= seems to be popular these days. Programming hasn't been a major function of my career for about 5 years so I am a little out of the loop. What language uses =/= to mean not equal?

    1. Re:In what language does =/= mean not equal? by hazem · · Score: 1

      Isn't =/= just an ASCII way of representing how you would write it on a piece of paper?

    2. Re:In what language does =/= mean not equal? by heson · · Score: 1

      Math is what you are looking for. But the programming language speed has it.

  57. AMD-V enabled? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I have a gateway netbook with an Athlon 64 L110 (1.2GHz Athlon 64) and R690M chipset, and Gateway thoughtfully disabled AMD-V in the BIOS and gave me no option to enable it, so I can't use vmware, virtualbox, et cetera. The bastards suggested I pay for support in order to beg for an updated BIOS. Does this machine come with AMD-V enabled? I hope to replace my BIOS with Coreboot one day, my chipset and processor family are supported...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  58. Peppermint OS is easy on the battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a fork of ubuntu that is built for low energy consumption. LXDE desktop helps keep power drain down. It works great on my Lenovo Z61m. Unlike other linux distros, I had no trouble getting it to work beyond a couple minor tweaks.

  59. The problem is GNOME by extrasolar · · Score: 1

    I have an Asus EEEPC 2G Surf--you really can't get lower end on a netbook than this one. I use it regularly for IRC, Web, and programming projects and while, yes, it is sluggish, the key is to go for a minimal Debian install and work your way up from there. Forget about GNOME or KDE, if you're looking for a desktop experience, then you're looking at the wrong place.

    As old and outdated as this computer is, is more than beats the user experience of an iPad since I can comfortably rest it on my lap in the lazyboy and tilt the screen up while using it :)

  60. Re:Just pa by mjwx · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Yes, if you can track down the ACPI drivers for the fans.

    She's gone from suck to blow.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  61. Re:Just pa by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

    Actually, I just had to deal with a notebook where the exact opposite was true - Toshiba Satellite A40.

    It's an old Celeron laptop. ACPI in Windows XP is broken for it - no fan speed control, and the system takes the temperature from the wrong sensor, so it thinks it's overheating when in reality it's running at 40C.

    What's it do when it overheats? Throttles back to about 10% speed. Slower than a 266mhz PII. :P

    The irony is of course... it works great with Linux!

  62. Battery life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The battery life is shorter because there isn't power management for the radeon driver in the Linux kernel yet.
    The first drm merge request for the next Linux kernel contains code which begins to address this.
    Asus probably threw together the most inexpensive modern components they could find while assuming there was a good chance they could eventually retail the machine with Linux on it.

    Unfortunately, Asus probably weren't aware of ATI's commitment to open source or therefore their lack of and decided that pre-installing Windows was a tax unsuitable for a budget machine.

    Depending on your view point, it only means that you either pay more than an OEM license for Windows by buying the retail version of Windows 7 for the machine or install any flavour of Linux and be patient over the next year waiting for the kernel updates to the radeon drm code in the Linux kernel.

  63. Citrix Receiver on iPad by gig · · Score: 1

    Put Xen Desktop on your big honking Linux desktop and remote access it for 10 hours at a time using Citrix Receiver on iPad.

  64. Still Comes with a Windows Key by juancnuno · · Score: 1

    And yet, it still comes with a Windows key. Even Apples don't have Apple keys any more!

  65. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    > I don't understand why there are no laptops with a small power supply and (barely..) no battery.

    I wondered this too: and whenever I pack my eeePC I think about leaving the battery module at home, to save weight. But I always take it anyway, just in case.

    I guess one answer is to pickup a cheap, 2nd hand laptop (cheap because the battery is dud). Ripout the power cells to save weight, although it will not make it smaller, just lighter. (Maybe a clever case-modder could turn the space into a pens and earbuds storage !)

  66. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple solution: Use Opera.
    I do (on an EEE900A) and it was very much usable even before I installed a faster SSD and more RAM. Now I barely notice a difference to my dekstop (Flash videos excluded).

  67. Re:I want a small power supply, not a good battery by hitmark · · Score: 1

    how do a laptop running on rechargeable AA's sound?

    http://www.norhtec.com/products/gecko/index.html

    the charger is right there in the computer.

    iirc, they are also working on a computer in a keyboard. Basically a setup much like the C64 or amiga 500.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  68. Re:Just pa by IchBinEinPenguin · · Score: 1

    What is this "gooey" you speak of? -- posted using links

  69. The name GNU/Linux by tepples · · Score: 1

    So Linux kernel is the OS after all just like computer science has proofed.

    To run a compiler on Linux, you also need a runtime library and a shell of some sort. In the case of GCC, which is written in C, one most commonly uses glibc as the C runtime library and Bash with Coreutils as the shell, whereas most versions of Linux in embedded systems use the "uClinux" stack: either uClibc or Newlib as the C runtime library and BusyBox as the shell.

    And you can run compiler on it even when using the ExpressGate.

    Is there a web page about a TCC, GCC, or Clang package to run on Splashtop aka ExpressGate?

    But who would tell that to GNU and get killed because there is no such thing as GNU/Linux OS?

    GNU/Linux is a combination of Linux, glibc, and Bash with Coreutils, used by the vast majority of desktop and server Linux systems. I have been using the term to mean "Linux that's not for an embedded system".

  70. Re:Just pa by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    It can sort out those vacation photos and movies and better accomodate posting flammage on Slashdot.

    The iPad will probably be left home. The netbook is still coming along. So is the Archos.

    Sometimes a castrated machine is just castrated...

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  71. Re:Just pa by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Of course this ACPI stuff is yesterdays' FUD. Of course like always, the trolls
    are stuck in the past and one step behind. It's not the question of ACPI support
    that I would focus on with this machine. The more interesting question is whether
    or not the GPU has any h264 support and if that applies to Flash as well.

    What do you think is going to be overwhelming a netbook CPU anyways?

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  72. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmmm.... I bought a compaq 386 laptop a long, long, time ago without an OS. How is this news?

  73. Too many batteries. My dream machine, tho... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    That computer takes 8 AAs. I have a camera that takes 8 AAs and I've learned the hard way - that many batteries weighs a lot. I use lithiums just because they're lighter.

    No, what I want is a TRS 80 Model 100 with 8 gigs of internal flash, legacy ports replaced by 2 or 3 USB ports, and a text-based Linux distro like INX.

    An ethernet port would be required; 802.11x would be optional but nice. Since the only thing I used my M100 for was writing, it's incredibly important that this fantasy machine have exactly the wonderful mechanical feel of the old M100. That thing was an unalloyed joy to type on. And since this is a writer's tool, exclusively, I could even forgo INX as long as I have a file system and VIM.

    Seriously, if there were someone out there modding old M100s to these specs by ripping out and replacing the guts while maintaining the form factor and wonderful keyboard mechanicals, I'd buy it in a heartbeat for USD$500. I'd consider paying USD$1000.

  74. Damn by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "aren't"

  75. netbook price by bored · · Score: 1

    I have been a little surprised to see the price on a computer go up. I blame it mostly on the big computer manufactures getting into the game and not being able to make a profit on a machine that asus/msi/etc are willing to sell for just a few dollars profit. The key is just to ignore the name brand netbook manufactures, I picked up a MSI L1350, running win7 starter this weekend with a cheezy inkjet for $200 (frys). The "no-name" ones regularly go on sale for less than $230.

  76. Re:Yes there are more Linux alternatives for these by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course flash movies are slow with 1MB RAM!

  77. Re:Too many batteries. My dream machine, tho... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    well, it can also use custom lithium packs, tho i am unsure how that will effect the weight. Heck, it maybe able to run of the wall socket without batteries inserted for all i know.

    now that TRS you linked to made me think of this:
    http://www.asus.com/product.aspx?P_ID=wxnpgpW4BIy2IJoX

    the asus eeekeyboard. But the charger there seems to be the same that they are using for the eeepc series of netbooks. Not the biggest i have seen, but still a brick to carry around.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  78. Re:Too many batteries. My dream machine, tho... by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

    I've seen Asus page before. It's intriguing, but it's not portable. There's no display. If there were a way to use that touch screen as a display, it would still be awkwardly sized and the keyboard looks to be anything but the writer's joy that the M100 was.

    As an alternative to the M100, there are low-end computers aimed at the educational and writer's market such as the Dana. However, I've had a chance to hold a Dana and some competing models. None of them have the "Damn, this is so perfect!" feel to their keyboard as the M100. That thing was special.

    Of course, all this talk of tactile interfaces is really subjective. I learned to type during the switchover from manuals to electrics in my high school typing class. So the "mechanicalness" of the M100 just feels perfect to me in a way that few other devices (a particular model of Panasonic electric typewriter comes to mind) possibly can. No matter how much I long for that sort of device, I doubt I'll ever have one. I should probably get a Dana and see if I can adapt.

    What bugs me is that I know such a thing as an updated M100 is possible. There's a market for the Happy Hacking keyboard, right? So how hard would it be to graft an 8-line monochrome LCD display on top of that? If somebody does it, I'll buy it.

  79. Re:Too many batteries. My dream machine, tho... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    iirc, it can act as a display, as the UI shown on it is basically a windows program.

    but yes, it may have been more useful if it was a strip across the top, like say the logitech G15:
    http://www.logitech.com/en-us/gaming/mice_keyboard_combos/devices/3498

    to bad samsung never exported this:
    http://www.umpcportal.com/products/Samsung/SPH-P9200

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  80. Price Comparisons by Yfrwlf · · Score: 1

    Anyone want to speculate why NewEgg is hiding the prices for the ones with Windows?

    http://www.newegg.com/Product/ProductList.aspx?Submit=ENE&DEPA=0&Order=BESTMATCH&Description=EEE+1201&x=0&y=0

    The polite thing would be to say that it's simply because it's "high". At least they aren't doing the reverse and hiding the price of the no-OS one.

    --
    Promote true freedom - support standards and interoperability.
  81. It costs a LOT more than that here by tepples · · Score: 1

    while I am indeed used recently to the concept of prepaid 4 GB for ~$15 recharge, valid two months

    I was in a Best Buy store yesterday, and I checked on this. It turns out that Virgin Mobile offers 1 GB for $40 or 5 GB for $60, valid one month.

    Plenty good enough internet "while commuting on a bus, train, or carpool" isn't that painful on the amount of data transferred.

    Until your operating system's automatic update manager notices that there is an Internet connection and proceeds to helpfully start background-downloading all 250 MB of the next service pack. Or are the update managers in Windows 7, Mac OS X 10.6, and Ubuntu 10.04 flexible enough that the user can block update downloads over specific network interfaces or specific WLAN SSIDs?

    1. Re:It costs a LOT more than that here by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Any reason why you look only at Virgin Mobile? Customers tying themselves, in practise, to one carrier doesn't help...

      And surely you know how to disable updates.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:It costs a LOT more than that here by tepples · · Score: 1

      Any reason why you look only at Virgin Mobile?

      No other such carrier had pamphlets in the Best Buy store I was in. What U.S. carrier are you hinting at, or what Google keywords should I use?

    3. Re:It costs a LOT more than that here by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Hey, I don't know your market all that well. But let me put it this way - the offer I mentioned is the best one here. I could just as easily (however little sense this would have) get one comparable to the "old rate" that I also mentioned; and people here...do use those, too.

      Couple that with people on /. mentioning sometimes some reasonably decent US MVNO (that might be one keyword...there's even a list on Wiki), and it's quite likely you can get some much more decent deals.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter