Slashdot Mirror


Australian Police Ask Facebook For Police Alarm Button

littlekorea writes "The Australian Federal Police (AFP) has requested social networking site Facebook install a law enforcement representative in Australia and introduce some sort of button in which users can immediately report online crime to the police in a single click. It is National Cyber-Security Awareness Week in Australia, so the AFP is on an all-out offensive — announcing it is also investigating whether Google committed offences under Australia's Telecommunications Interception Act when it harvested Wi-Fi data." Something like this has been in the works for a while.

237 comments

  1. australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whats up with australia? its a development country yet seems to go crazy with censorship and crazy laws

    1. Re:australia? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They want to 'develop' into a fascist state off the bad and skip that whole messy democracy stuff

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    2. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, as the poms aren't sending convicts any more, the government have got to create their own. The recent spate of crazy laws are just to try and regain that traditional "penal colony" feeling.

    3. Re:australia? by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Australia: Live the Shower Scene.

      Think the Tourism Authority will make it a motto?

    4. Re:australia? by pookemon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Which crazy "laws" does this /. article refer too? The "Report crime through a button" law? No - wait - the "Google may have broken a law" law. Having the ability to report crime simply through facebook is not a law - and it's simply an extension to dialing a number or visiting a police station to report a crime.

      As for google - they have deliberately been sniffing WAP's - and the extent of that means that they may have been breaking a law which has existed for a very long time in Aus.

      So get off your high horse before you hurt yourself.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    5. Re:australia? by ob0101011101 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They want to 'develop' into a fascist state off the bad and skip that whole messy democracy stuff

      It's true. The AFP also wanted a few other Facecook buttons: "Are my Papers OK?" and "Turn in My Parents". The real problems started in Australian politics when the christian fundys managed to get a guy into parliament. I guess they think they have the moral high-ground; when really they're just a bunch of arse-clowns, pushing their beliefs. So much for separation of church and state. *sigh*

    6. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is simply "payback" from The Christian Censorship Senator (Conroy) because Google criticised his craptastic internet filtering plan.

    7. Re:australia? by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Mate,

      At this rate anything's bloody possible!

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    8. Re:australia? by Okonomiyaki · · Score: 4, Funny

      They got 'a guy' into parliament? 'A' guy? One? Let me tell you about the USA...

    9. Re:australia? by siliconincdotnet · · Score: 1

      They came in below the bar in the police state contest the US and UK seem to be competing in. I guess they decided they didn't want to be the losers.

      Hooray for the underdog! Oh, wait...

      --
      Insert witty .sig here
    10. Re:australia? by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "So much for separation of church and state."

      I think you're conflating Oz with Kansas, Oz is not part of the the US (yet). Our (cerimonial) head of state is the Queen and she is also the head of the church of England.

      "The real problems started in Australian politics when the christian fundys managed to get a guy into parliament."

      We have always had token fundies in both state and federal parliments, democracy is not an excuse to silence well organised nutters.

      As for TFA; Try keeping it in perspective. Asking for a "snitch button" on facebook is no different to asking a TV station to put a "neighborhood watch" ad on TV.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:australia? by digitalchinky · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The police are only ~asking~ - Facebook can say no - and really, given how long the AFP have been banging away at this, it appears as if many are actually saying no. Now the AFP is acting like a big frigging baby, going to the press because "facebook wont do what we tell them, so we're going to make them look like they don't want to save the children"

      I can't really figure out why it's the AFP pushing this - I would imagine there is a tad more to the story than just reporting crime, probably someone wants to figure out the guilt trail of association via friend links. Who knows.

    12. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the damn labour government making laws on their own accord, being an Aussie i didn't vote for them last election and have been spreading the word that we need to get this government out as quickly as possible to minimise the damage

      there have been rallies etc.. to stop this madness, but the government don't seem to be listening, will be out on their assess next election

    13. Re:australia? by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      What? We want to have our own culture and identity and not walk at the heal of the USA or Europe? That must be shocking for you!

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    14. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess the Christians are a popular scape goat for your type, as opposed to, I don't know, the people who actually voted.

    15. Re:australia? by deek · · Score: 1

      The censorship is crazy, I agree, but it hasn't gone through yet. There is talk of legislation for it towards the end of the year, but currently it hasn't passed through the democratic process. So far, it's all talk, and a little bit of 'convenient' test results.

      Crazy laws, like having a button on Facebook where Australians can report online crime to Australian police? What is crazy about that? How is it different than providing a phone number to report crime? Look at it this way, it's an attempt by the Australian police to modernise the way they work. Don't you want your law enforcement to enter the modern age?

      Sure, there will probably be issues with identity and a high rate of false calls, but at least they're trying something different.

      I'm not familiar with Facebook development. Couldn't the Australian police just develop a Facebook app and restrict usage to Australian residents?

    16. Re:australia? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      The real problems started in Australian politics when the christian fundys managed to get a guy into parliament.

      A guy? You're not looking hard enough. Both major parties are full of them. This election vote below the line for a third party candidate. Some good ones whose stated goals are protecting our freedoms are., Australian democrats, Greens, Australian sex party, Pirate party. In order of my personal preference. You may also wish to give these partys you last preference, Liberal party, Labor party, Family first.

      You have to go back to 1928 to find a non labor or liberal party in power in Australia. Time for a motherfucking change.

    17. Re:australia? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Then have the AFP petition the government for Ad revenue and they can have their button.

    18. Re:australia? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      Seeing as everyone has to vote or be fined I'm guessing most of the voters are sheep.

    19. Re:australia? by KeensMustard · · Score: 1

      The real problems started in Australian politics when the christian fundys managed to get a guy into parliament.

      Look again.

      The 'guy' in question, Senator Steve Fielding might be a Christian but the policies of his party (Family First) have nothing to do with Christianity. A look at the website http://www.familyfirst.org.au/ makes no mention of Christianity and lays out policies that directly conflict with the teachings of Christianity. Even the name 'Family First' is in conflict with Christian teachings. Reading the website you can see that the driver for the party has less to do with faith, and more to do with fear. In other words, these policies are meant to appeal to the subset of the population who view the changes in society as something (a) that can be corrected by government and (b) something to be afraid of.

    20. Re:australia? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      They could also purchase it as advertisement in the for of, you guessed it, a button.

    21. Re:australia? by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      Bollocks. They don't want some ad which pops up every once in a while. They want a button. It's like asking the TV station to have a permanent chyron on screen with the authorites' phone numbers. It's a PRIVATE CORPORATION, it's completely unreasonable to expect the PRIVATE CORPORATION to provide a direct conduit for users to the government. The users have a browser bar; presumably they know how to do a web search and go to the government themselves. In fact, they don't even have to leave Blessed Facebook to run the search--in case you hadn't noticed, Facebook includes web searches now if things aren't found on the site. AND, the Aussie Police can exert themselves and create their own Fan Page so that they can have their own landing page inside Facebook. It's WAY over the top for them to request something so intrusive.

    22. Re:australia? by TapeCutter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It's a PRIVATE CORPORATION, it's completely unreasonable to expect the PRIVATE CORPORATION to provide a direct conduit for users to the government."

      So why aren't people up in arms because telco's are forced by law to provide a 000 service (ie: Aussie 911). Nobody is forcing facebook to do anything, it's a fucking request for a community service that facebook can either grant, deny, or offer something in between.

      "It's WAY over the top for them to request something so intrusive."

      Facebook may or may not see things differently but since it's mearly a request it's up to them to decide what is "over the top".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    23. Re:australia? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Here in Oz many media outlets run "community service" ads for free, nobody forces them to do so. This request is no different, facebook are under no obligation to comply.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    24. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talking abou innovation an idea comes to everyone's mind. How about introducing also a button which reads "I FEEL OFFENDED" available on every facebook content. - Of course the use of such button would be reserved to the only known oppressed minority of the world: Muslims.

    25. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, the signal to noise ratio will be immensely un-useful with this approach..

    26. Re:australia? by Thiez · · Score: 1

      I spend some time reading their policies, those people are scary! :O

    27. Re:australia? by Thiez · · Score: 1

      > How is it different than providing a phone number to report crime?

      Because it's more like requiring every phone to have a button that reports the person you're speaking to to the police. Providing a phone number to report crime is like the police creating a website where people can report crime. Oh darn, they probably do that already!

    28. Re:australia? by pla · · Score: 2

      It's true. The AFP also wanted a few other Facecook buttons: "Are my Papers OK?" and "Turn in My Parents".

      Joking aside, in this specific situation, I say "give them exactly what they asked for" - A button at the top of every facebook page that reports something directly to the police. The more it reports, the better.

      And when, a week later, the police beg to stop having their inbox flooded with useless complaints about every troll and mean comment posted around the world, then Facebook can take their time in a six-month review of the social, technological, and procedural "implications" of the proposed change.

    29. Re:australia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We voted Labor, that's what.

    30. Re:australia? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      The real problems started in Australian politics when the christian fundys managed to get a guy into parliament

      The real problem is that people think that all their problems can be solved by just getting the government to make everyone behave in the way they know to be best.

      You could get every religious fundamentalist out of government and still lose all your freedom to the basic human desire to control what your neighbors are doing.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    31. Re:australia? by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to mention the whole article stemmed from a meeting convened by the US Department of Justice "to discuss concerns that content service providers did not sufficiently co-operate with international law enforcement". So it is more the US sticky breaking into other countries, rather than the Australian Federal police over reaching within Australia.

      The US has a major problem with regards to laws that allow it's law enforcement to break laws in other countries, with laws that do not provide legal rights to foreigners, which severely limits legal cooperation and access in foreign countries as based upon those laws, they cannot be trusted.

      The whole meeting makes absolutely no sense at all. No countries law enforcement should have direct access across international boundaries, all interaction should be indirect and be via local law, end of story. The US justice department needs to get it act together in the US before it can start poking into other countries policing systems.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    32. Re:australia? by daver00 · · Score: 1

      In regards to censorship, the laws have always been in place, Australia has always had draconian censorship laws. Somewhere along the line they decided they could extend this to the internet. Of course nobody as yet has been able to demonstrate this as plausible and the last I've heard the tests have resulted in the decision to limit the black list to something like 500 websites!

  2. Online Identity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    With the use of facebook, many online identities have been progressing towards being just as anonymous as a citizen walking down the street. The fact that other sites can link to your signed-in profile is almost like walking around a mall with your ID card taped to your forehead.

    "Police buttons" like this will only work when the identity of the user is known, sort of like how 911 works...

    I for one don't particularly like this trend, and much prefer to remain anonymous on the web.

    In other words: donotwant

    1. Re:Online Identity by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Just waiting for eBay [or other] to buy out Facebook and require every account be linked to a PayPal-like or verification-like account for 'proof of identity'

    2. Re:Online Identity by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Shudders, you need a credit card to chat online (no charge), or a trip to the post office to get a unique number to log in after you show photo id :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  3. Because this totally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    won't get flagrantly misused

    1. Re:Because this totally by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      Thats alarming.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    2. Re:Because this totally by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, now whenever people say things like "well, that's just criminal!", i'll feel obligated to press the button.

      Actually I feel obligated to press it anyway, because it's stupid, but i'll be looking for excuses.

    3. Re:Because this totally by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Report every slightly suggestive picture. "I thought (s)he was a minor!".

    4. Re:Because this totally by TheJokeExplainer · · Score: 1

      I see what you did there! MrKaos made a clever use of the term "alarming" based on the headline. Huzzah!

      --
      visit my pal the xkcd explainer!
    5. Re:Because this totally by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I might have to sign up to Facebook again just to abuse this button.

    6. Re:Because this totally by cgenman · · Score: 1

      Anyone who thinks this can be manned by "a" law enforcement officer has no idea what they're talking about.

      On a side note, why just Facebook? I come across obvious criminals on Craigslist every day, but reporting that is basically impossible. Why single out Facebook?

    7. Re:Because this totally by StrategicIrony · · Score: 1

      cuz, that's where the all childrenz is loitering

      duhhh

    8. Re:Because this totally by Hadlock · · Score: 1

      So what, if someone pushes the "criminal!" button, AU PD get full access to both your FB profile and the accuser's as well? No thanks.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    9. Re:Because this totally by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Because there was a murder here recently linked to Facebook. Not that this button would have done anything to prevent it, but the cops have got to be seen to be doing something to address it.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    10. Re:Because this totally by hazem · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even sadder, in practice, most of the things you see on Facebook are posted by "friends", so this is essentially encouraging you to rat on your friends.

      On the other hand, if you really need to be using a "notify the police" button when hanging out with your friends, then maybe you need different friends.

    11. Re:Because this totally by CheshireFerk-o · · Score: 0

      Indeed this is true, and mostly the reason I do not use facebook. There is not really a way to browse people of like interests, just connections of/and friends... why the hell would I want to talk to people online i already know? So they can spam me with .gifs and farmville....????

      The point: You can only connect with people you accept to a list. If you feel the need to press that said button, someone else probably thinks that about you.

    12. Re:Because this totally by MrKaos · · Score: 1

      TheJokeExplainer is being like the pubic hair in the meal someone *was* enjoying then going MU HAHAHAHA at the dastardly evil genius of the deed.

      I'm guessing you are new here and have spent a lot of time on 4chan.

      --
      My ism, it's full of beliefs.
    13. Re:Because this totally by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      Lol yeah, cf. that law about people with small chests being legally considered under 18. Or was that Germany or something?

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
  4. I AM NOT A KOOK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll see if I can come up with a Rossetta Stone that will enable one to translate between all four schools during my Psychology Dissertation. I'll start applying to some of the top schools after I ask the taxpayers of San Jose, California to spring for the taxi fare so a couple of San Jose's Finest can give me a lift to the Napa State psychiatric hospital in California's Napa Valley.

    I. Abstract

    Crawfordian Psychoanalysis is derived from the following books as well as my life experience over the last twenty-six years spent treating the Schizophrenia of homeless people as well as counseling those with Bipolar Affective Disorder; it's more commonly known as Manic Depression as well as Bipolar Depression. I have been saving the lives of the suicidally despondent since I was just a toddler in the late 1960s.

    During my year of volunteer work for the Suicide Prevention Service of Santa Cruz County back when I was an undergraduate Physics student starting in the Fall of 1987, it happened all the time that a man would ring me up from a payphone with a loaded gun in his hand, or that a woman would ring me up from her bedroom with a bottle of sleeping pills and every intention to use them. I never once so much as contemplated sending for the police, the ambulance or the coroner.

    All I ever required was an hour of Active Listening, in which the counselor listens carefully to what the client is saying, then responds in such a way as to make the client feel that the counselor really heard what they were saying. That's It.

    If I ever so much as opened my mouth about the gentleman who managed to track down my home number from the SPSSC answering service then asked for me by name so I could convince him to stop hanging around a payphone with his loaded pistol to his temple, he would lose his Top Secret security clearance. I'll have to leave the reason as an exercise for my Gentle Reader.

    Far, far more important has been my work treating the mental illnesses of Psychotherapists, Psychiatrists as well as the Psychiatric Nurses and Social Workers who staff Psychiatric Inpatient Hospitals since my first inpatient psychiatric admission. In November 1984 during the first term of my junior year of my studies at the California Institute of Technology when I I abruptly and for no aparent reason switched my major from Physics to Literature right in the middle of the Fall Quarter.

    The only other person I have ever met who regarded that decision as anything but delusional or manic was Caltech Theoretical Physics Professor Richard Feynman. Feynman's deep insight into numerical analysis led him to enable the Trinity Test - a Plutonium Implosion Bomb - to knock a man flat at ten miles. The Uranium Assembly Bombed totally vaporized Hiroshima on the first try. The Plutonium Implosion Bomb dropped on Nagasaki did much the same thing.

    How did Dick Feynman work such a miracle? Just by having a bunch of smart guys hang out in a big room for a year or two with tables of logarithms and mechanical adding machines. That's It.

    Now you know why I flip out so much about the North Korean, Iraqi and Iranian nuclear weapons programs. Don't even get me started about the Israeli Bomb. Just Don't. The mere contemplation of the fact that Israel is well-known to possess at least three hundred nuclear weapons as well as dozens of Medium Range Ballistic Missiles that can hit anywhere in Iran completely fills me with a desperate urge to paint the entire wall to my left with my own brains.

    Just wait until I explain why five minutes spent sketching on the back of an envelope would give you a deep insight into the Hydrogen Bomb. That's why the Cold War was so totally batshit paranoid. In 1953 a phenomenon known as Radiative Transfer lit the Hydrogen Bomb's fuse by enabling a two-stage Plutonium Implosion Bomb to set fire to a chunk of styrofoam in the shape of a large pill capsule. That

    1. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 1

      I think your IP should be banned.

    2. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      I AM NOT A KOOK!

      Of course not. Why would anyone think you were a kook for posting over 4,400 words about some completely sane subject matter on Slashdot? I can't wait for the sequel: "More Shit No-one Cares About" and the eventual prequel: "Hey, Guess What I'm Thinking Right Now?"

      If this was Facebook I'd be clicking that big red Australian 'Report An Online Crime' button right now to report you stealing minutes of my life.

    3. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think your IP should be banned.

      So....slashdot should have a police button?

    4. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 0

      OMG WOOSH!

      Above is an example of what should be reported, written for such a purpose as to demonstrate the insanity of the idea.

    5. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG WOOSH!

      Above is an example of what should be reported, written for such a purpose as to demonstrate the insanity of the idea.

      Above is an example of what should be ignored, written for such a purpose as to confirm the stupidity of the poster.

      BTW, it's "whoosh", "woosh" is the sound the loo makes when your post moves on to a "better place".

    6. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fuck is the point of this post? No one cares how you're some suicide hero.

      Let them kill themselves. It's a problem that takes care of itself.

    7. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by ElderKorean · · Score: 1

      I think your IP should be banned.

      So....slashdot should have a police button?

      Maybe not slashdot, but 4chan should have a police button :-)

      While were adding buttons to facebook - where's my dislike button (that some people are actually asking for)

    8. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by Moodie-1 · · Score: 1

      If this was Facebook I'd be clicking that big red Australian 'Report An Online Crime' button right now to report you stealing minutes of my life.

      Seems to me most of those stolen minutes must have been spent counting all those "4400" words.

    9. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fool! You've doomed us all.

    10. Re:I AM NOT A KOOK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Siiiiiit, you didn't even get past the first couple paragraphs.

  5. By any chance do they specify the button details? by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Funny


    "The Australian Federal Police (AFP) has requested social networking site Facebook install a law enforcement representative in Australia and introduce some sort of button in which users can immediately report online crime

    Would they be specifying that it take on the form of an amber lamp? Would seem logical given the rest of Australia's wtf'ery.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  6. Pushes Big Red Shiny Button by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Hello, police? I want to report an online crime! Facebook is telling everyone in the world everything about me! It's not fair!! What's my name? You can check me out at www.facebook.com/EveryFacebookUser ..."

    1. Re:Pushes Big Red Shiny Button by naz404 · · Score: 1

      Hmm. I believe this calls for the very appropriate use of http://nooooooooooooooo.com.

    2. Re:Pushes Big Red Shiny Button by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Police: Do you have pictures of yourself on Facebook?
      Me: Yes
      Police: Are you a female?
      Me: Yes
      Police: Do you have small boobs?
      Me: Err, umm, yes.
      Police: We will be right there, thanks for turning yourself in.

      For those that think I'm trolling: http://www.google.com/search?rls=en&q=australia+small+breast+law

      Not sure what is going on down under these days.

    3. Re:Pushes Big Red Shiny Button by Grumbleduke · · Score: 1

      I think this just about highlights one of the two major problems with any sort of "crime reporting" system like this.
      The general public have very little idea what is actually a crime. Most of us have some vague idea what is illegal and what isn't, but actually tuning that into a criminal offence is probably beyond the majority. Personally, I've seen this particularly clearly with copyright stuffs (particularly when it comes to piracy, I am a Pirate, after all); I have some legal training (and have actually read our main copyright law here) and what the public seem to think is and isn't lawful is often quite different from what is actually the case.

      The second problem is, obviously, that of knowingly-false use; you're just giving the less pleasant section of the Internet another thing to abuse.

    4. Re:Pushes Big Red Shiny Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What the fuck, Australia?? Seriously. What? The? Fuck??

  7. ... and then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I am certain that as soon as this is implemented, some guy or groups of guys will abuse this for all its worth. Whether it be for political reason, activicism of anything else. This will be like a DDOS on the poor guy who will be in change of checking these things, it will be a waste of money.

    1. Re:... and then by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 1

      Except that in theory, the user identity is linked to the button, so someone who has a legit Facebook profile (aka real name, actually uses it) and abuses the button will probably get busted for a false alarm, akin to prank dialing 911.

    2. Re:... and then by Thiez · · Score: 1

      Except that in theory, you can lie about your real name.

  8. A One Click Solution? by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Does Amazon know about his?

    Putting a single click police call on Facebook? Can you imagine all the false alarms - whether by accident or on purpose? Is Australia going to prosecute false alarms?

    I think some folks really need to put the Foster's down.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:A One Click Solution? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does Amazon know about his?

      It only violates Amazon's patent if you order an online crime with one click, not report one.

    2. Re:A One Click Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does Amazon know about his?

      It only violates Amazon's patent if you order an online crime with one click, not report one.

      Amazon might try and file a suit in East Texas District Court in an attempt to prove otherwise...

    3. Re:A One Click Solution? by PatPending · · Score: 1

      Does Amazon know about his?

      I'd nod in agreement but unfortunately I'd be violating Bezos' latest patent application.

      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    4. Re:A One Click Solution? by chilvence · · Score: 1

      Australians don't drink fosters! Ask anybody.

    5. Re:A One Click Solution? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Not sure what they are wanting, log every reported ip and connect them to a user via an isp?
      Note the stated age of the person doing the reporting in a follow up confidential email/chat/phonecall.
      Then wait for for the same name to show up again and again.
      Log the suspects internet traffic and see what they are downloading.
      This would be a great way to generate discovery without having a police officer in a chat/forum trying to build up a legend over months and years.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    6. Re:A One Click Solution? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      We really don't. It's a bad example of beer. We keep the good stuff for ourselves. ;)

    7. Re:A One Click Solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, anybody drinking Foster's is likely to be an American.

      You should have said "Tooheys" or "VB".

      Thanks for playing, though. :)

    8. Re:A One Click Solution? by IICV · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is... one click for both hookers and blow? That's insanity!

  9. False alarm by GillyGuthrie · · Score: 1

    Hmm... What happens if you accidentally click the button?

    1. Re:False alarm by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm... What happens if you accidentally click the button?

      Then you're committing an online crime and reporting yourself, so I wouldn't recommend it ;-)

    2. Re:False alarm by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      OMG! You didn't click it did you? Did you?

      RUN!!!!

    3. Re:False alarm by Falconhell · · Score: 1

      A light lights up saying "Please do not press this button again". HHGTG

      (:

    4. Re:False alarm by Tynin · · Score: 1

      I can just see the legal defense team doing a GIS on lolcat keyboard as a means of gathering evidence that it was in fact the defendants cat that pressed the button to notify the police.

    5. Re:False alarm by PPH · · Score: 1

      Black helicopters landing on your lawn in 3 ... 2 .... 1 ....

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    6. Re:False alarm by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1
    7. Re:False alarm by masterwit · · Score: 1

      Hmm... What happens if you accidentally click the button?

      Oh I wouldn't worry about it... since the button will probably be written in flash, just use an ipad and you ought to be safe

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    8. Re:False alarm by ThePengwin · · Score: 1

      After all the money the Australian government has piddled away with their plans involving the internet, I think this would be more appropriate:

      Beat up Holden Commodores with flashing lights arriving at your house in 3....2....1

    9. Re:False alarm by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      You insensitive clod, our government can't afford black helicopters.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:False alarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're Australia bro - the choppers are broken

      http://ericpalmer.wordpress.com/2010/04/05/problem-confirmed-with-australias-mrh-90-helicopter/

  10. Why Facebook? by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

    20 ga-jillion websites in the world, why should facebook and a select few others bear the burden? Australian police want a "report crime" button on a website, put it on their own...you know, where I'd look for one...if i was looking in the first place...whatever the aussie equivalent of dialling 911 is still going to be faster than typing a report into a website...which, in the unlikely event it actually worked, would instantly generate a phone call from the police to the submitter anyway...

    can't see the website button getting abused in any way, no siree...

    --
    When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    1. Re:Why Facebook? by Lord+Dreamshaper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hate to reply to my own comment but...

      now picture this argument being brought to the US where the FBI gets a button, each of the 50 states gets a button, every county, town, city PD gets a button, etc. etc....the internet would collapse under the weight of all the buttons, none of which would ever get used for a useful purpose...

      --
      When all of your wishes have been granted, many of your dreams will be destroyed - Marilyn Manson
    2. Re:Why Facebook? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      What a great idea! I'm gonna go register ButtonsToReportEverything.com right now. I'm gonna be a gazillionaire!

    3. Re:Why Facebook? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      That sounds like the case already with many pages that have dozens of buttons to "share" the web page via dozens of social networking sites. Heaven forbid it's one of those mouse over things where it exposes a pop-open panel festooned with social media buttons, usually covering up something that I wanted to read.

      The people that want this button either are doing it for the attention, or haven't thought it through. If someone has reason to believe a crime is happening, they can place a phone call with the local dispatcher.

    4. Re:Why Facebook? by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Oh yes! Just like the 911 system, where you have a different number to call for every emergency!

    5. Re:Why Facebook? by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      can't see the website button getting abused in any way, no siree...

      As opposed to a 3-digit telephone number?

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    6. Re:Why Facebook? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The problem with those popups is that you usually have to scroll BACK over the button in order to get the damn box to hide again.

    7. Re:Why Facebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facebook is being singled out because that is where the stupid people are.

    8. Re:Why Facebook? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      Well, the "Why Facebook?" part is easy to answer.

      Facebook has 500 million users - 1/6th of humanity - with 400 million of them 'active'.

      The "aussie equivalent of dialling 911" is '000'. Calling 000 and describing the offensive messages over the phone to an unimpressed emergency dispatcher is NOT 'faster' than a button that gives police instant electronic access to the conversation and identities in question.

      If you use Gmail, they have a "this is spam" button - that is certainly faster than calling Google's helpdesk.

      This is besides the obvious deterrent value of having a highly visible button that everyone knows puts them a click away from police scrutiny.

    9. Re:Why Facebook? by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      http://www.afp.gov.au/contact/crime-stoppers.aspx

      There is not a form for "report a crime" due to privacy and security environment issues. There are forms for gun licenses/security checks/police misconduct/etc.

    10. Re:Why Facebook? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Facebook has 500 million users - 1/6th of humanity

      So the other three or so billion people on the planet are subhuman?

      If you use Gmail, they have a "this is spam" button - that is certainly faster than calling Google's helpdesk.

      That button doesn't contact any humans. And they STILL don't have a "reporting phishing scheme" button, though they do have some inadequate phishing detection.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:Why Facebook? by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

      > > Facebook has 500 million users - 1/6th of humanity

      > So the other three or so billion people on the planet are subhuman?

      Its "the other 5.5 Billion". Where did you get this 'subhuman' idea?

      > > If you use Gmail, they have a "this is spam" button - that is certainly faster than
      > > calling Google's helpdesk.

      > That button doesn't contact any humans. And they STILL don't have a "reporting phishing scheme"
      > button, though they do have some inadequate phishing detection.

      Well, one reason there is no Google "report phishing" or "report spam" button is Google has no one to 'report' it to. What can they do except classify it?

      Once the police start taking complaints electronically from Facebook, phishing complaints from Google should be one of the next few priorities.

  11. Hurry, Let's Patent It by Unoti · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Hurry, let's patent this idea. One-click-Narc.

  12. Why not use your own panic button? by davidwr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have one, but admittedly it requires 3 keypresses not one click.

    It's called a cell phone. "9" "1" "1" "Talk"

    It works quite well for reporting both online and offline crime.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      4.

    2. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by Faylone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That might be useful, if 911 was the number to call in Australia for emergencies. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/000_Emergency

    3. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in Australia. In Australia you have to dial 116.

    4. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      From a mobile the 112 emergency number is international :)

    5. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by LaZZaR · · Score: 1

      It would appear that common sense does not prevail anymore. I also feel that that the "younger" generation may not actually realise that their phone can do more than just texting/IM and facebook. Like, there was actually a time where people *spoke* on to each other using phones. So last decade...

      --
      I lost me sig.
    6. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have one but admittedly it requires 4 keypresses, not one click.

      There, fixed that four you. :-p

    7. Re:Why not use your own panic button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that the facebook button is a stupid idea, but...

      Calling for an emergency and calling to report a crime are two things that are not necessarily the same.

  13. I've got a great idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got a great idea! What if there was some kind of...
    Screw it, telephones. I can't think of a funny way to put this. TELEPHONES.

    1. Re:I've got a great idea by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Better yet -- there is a well defined standards-compliant HTML tag for this. It's called "mailto".

  14. What type of crimes? by KarlIsNotMyName · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What type of crimes to they believe happen (often) on Facebook? And whatever other websites they might have contacted.

    I don't see how this would result in anything but meaningless spamming of that "button".

    --
    We are all God's parents.
    1. Re:What type of crimes? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      What type of crimes to they believe happen (often) on Facebook?

      Privacy violations!

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    2. Re:What type of crimes? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this would result in anything but meaningless spamming of that "button".

      It's like giving /b/ a direct line to the cops. They'll figure out that you can use this to partyvan a partyvan driver, and will keep doing it for the lulz.

    3. Re:What type of crimes? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      It wont matter what crime. just beacuse they are in a bad mood they will hit the button. "they called me names, go search their home and toss them in jail"

      I wonder if the big red button will allow searches and seizures and jail without anything to back it up.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:What type of crimes? by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      you mean all the teenagers showing their private parts?

    5. Re:What type of crimes? by masterwit · · Score: 1

      you mean all the teenagers showing their public parts?

      Fixed that for you...they actually do not own rights to their parts once they are uploaded.

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    6. Re:What type of crimes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      excessive fingering?

      pun not intended.

    7. Re:What type of crimes? by ChiRaven · · Score: 1

      What type of crimes to they believe happen (often) on Facebook?

      .

      Probably somebody stealing apples from your orchard in FarmVille.

    8. Re:What type of crimes? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "I wonder if the big red button will allow searches and seizures and jail without anything to back it up."

      They are not throwing out a millenia of common law, nor are they dismantling the westminster system, they are asking facebook to install a convinient link to the cops, end of story.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    9. Re:What type of crimes? by weicco · · Score: 1

      What type of crimes to they believe happen (often) on Facebook?

      Wrong and possibly "illegal" opinions. Plus pedophiles, or course. They are lurking behind every corner, be it physical or virtual corner. Someone must think about the children!

      The police here in Finland has expressed that they would like to have "alarm button to the internet" too (note: the whole internet). They want it because of the children and to prevent racist crimes. These two reasons are absolute bogus! No alarm button can save any children from pedophile. Police has already phone numbers and email addresses where everyone make a contact with them if they see crime happening. And no alarm button can prevent "racist crimes" because Finnish law does not define such a crime! Racism is, while disgusting (at least to me), expression of thought and not a crime per se. Freedom of speech, on the other hand, should be a virtue.

      --
      You don't know what you don't know.
    10. Re:What type of crimes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Recently there has been a bit of a media frenzy over a murder where the victim met her attacker on facebook (http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2010/05/17/2901537.htm). At the same time the NSW Police took a bit of a beating over not taking a, unrelated, complaint of facebook stalking seriously (local station wouldn't take the complaint at all).

      All just BS though. They already have more than enough tools to do their jobs.

    11. Re:What type of crimes? by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Meaningless spamming? That's the understatement of the week. This will go down in flames and tears even before 4chan gets their hands on it. The police servers will melt to a slag under that shitstorm of useless reports, rivulets of molten metal streaming from the racks, burning their way through the server room floors, running down the stairwells, the halon system helpless against the conflagration, panicked admins running through the smoke-filled, dimly emergency-lit corridors, desperately trying to escape, their beards and ponytails smoldering, their screams mingling with the siren's blare! Armageddon, man, it'll be Armageddon!

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
  15. I thought I'd seen this before... by slimjim8094 · · Score: 4, Informative

    And I did, but it was just for the UK.

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/03/12/0149233

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:I thought I'd seen this before... by Turzyx · · Score: 1
      The proposal was rejected by Facebook Instead, they said

      UK users under the age of 19 will now be able to click on the ‘Report abuse’ link on each page and have the option to report the abuse directly to CEOP as well as to Facebook employees.

      There is are lot of knee-jerk reactions in politics when tragedies such as this happen. Even more so when the currently uncensored UK internet (and incompetent parents) grant unfettered internet access to children who should really know better but don't.

      Fortunately, that was the last government's reaction. When a gunman in Cumbria went on a killing spree recently, the current PM rejected immediate calls for heavier restrictions on gun ownership. I'm hoping the pattern continues.

    2. Re:I thought I'd seen this before... by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      The knee-jerk reaction to that (first) case really pissed me off. Yes, it was tragic, no, it should never have happened - but by all the reports that I've read she believed she was talking to a boy her own age. No amount of "I'm being groomed by a paedo!!!" panic buttons would have saved her.

  16. If only... by mirix · · Score: 1

    If only there was a "indict for crimes against humanity" button next to every site that has some sort of facebook like/link bullshit.

    When I see banners on brick and mortar stores asking "Are we facebook friends yet?" I die inside a little bit. When I see newscasts saying to "check our facebook", i get nauseous.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
    1. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for sharing I guess. Now tell us why you don't watch TV.

    2. Re:If only... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * Anonymous Coward, Anonymous Coward and 1024 others Liked this

  17. I'm starting to wonder by raddan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    did Australia run out of beer or something? Why are they all up in each other's shit lately?

    I knew that Australia has had a neoconservative movement somewhat like here in the U.S., but they seem to have taken the GWB concept and really run with it. Any Aussies care to inform us Merkins wtf is going on?

    1. Re:I'm starting to wonder by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Uhhhh.. the religious right wanna take away our porn.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Thing+1 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You don't need porn, just a heart bio-feedback monitor, for a short period of training. After a little practice, you'll be able to increase your heart rate by thinking about it, and then some things just magically happen. (It also helps to visualize the opening of certain valves. I'm totally serious.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    3. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > did Australia run out of beer or something?

      Yes. Some asshats legislated our drinks away. Now bars cant serve more than 5% past midnight in NSW, and half the other states are enforcing lockouts at 2 or 3:00AM.

    4. Re:I'm starting to wonder by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Any Aussies care to inform us Merkins wtf is going on?"

      We threw out the neocons and installed some neo-socialists. Our politicians can still safely walk the streets without a small army escorting them and that's not going to change unless they do something that really screws with our lives (such as running out of beer).

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    5. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any Aussies care to inform us Merkins wtf is going on?

      I realize what you were trying to do, but the actual definition of the word Merkin put a whole new spin on it.

    6. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the problem is, even though us in Austraila are a democracy, we only have 2 main political parties, who both have the 'Lets take the peoples rights away, for the good of the country' mentality.

      another problem is the advertising campaigns that they run. "if your not doing anything wrong, there is no reason why police shouldn't be allowed to go through your computer" etc. oh and one politician labeled anyone who is against the internet filter a pedophile.

      unfortunately, thanks to our aging population, the majority of votes are from the "baby boomers" who are starting to approach retirement now. the majority of which are are religious, have money and no need for the internet. their only thought on the internet is "protecting the grand kids from predators".

      also, the small boob thing i think was dropped, thanks to the massive outcry. Its scary to think that the idiots that come up with this sort of idea are the ones that are in power.

    7. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And replace it with buttons. To report porn.

    8. Re:I'm starting to wonder by SpudJones · · Score: 1

      Yes, we ran put of beer. No one is allowed to have fun anymore because there are laws against that.

    9. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Thiez · · Score: 1

      > Now bars cant serve more than 5% past midnight in NSW

      That doesn't make sense, how will people reproduce?!

    10. Re:I'm starting to wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhhhh.. the religious right wants to take away your heart bio-feedback monitor.

  18. Quick, tell Amazon to patent it. by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    Patent one-click douchebaggery. Save us all.

  19. One click? by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

    button in which users can immediately report online crime to the police in a single click.

    Doesn't Jeff Bezos have a patent on that?

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:One click? by Bill+Dog · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was thinking, in case a criminal had you at gunpoint and you couldn't click on something without the bad guy noticing, that they could implement a single nod system for reporting crimes.

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
  20. Grab your proxies boys by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 5, Funny

    We're going to report some crimes.

    --
    'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
    1. Re:Grab your proxies boys by DigiShaman · · Score: 1
      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Grab your proxies boys by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>We're going to report some crimes.

      I hereby award you the "Defender of Humanity Barnstar" in recognition of your achievements in cracking down on crime in Wikipedia.

    3. Re:Grab your proxies boys by Crazyswedishguy · · Score: 1

      Apparently, this is what the Australian police has in mind for what happens after you click the button...

      --
      This space up for sale.
    4. Re:Grab your proxies boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The blood was funny, but I'm sadded that the officer didn't steal her helmet as well.

    5. Re:Grab your proxies boys by enoz · · Score: 1

      It's no coincidence that the IT Crowd also showed the effectiveness of emailing the fire dept, a somewhat similar action to a "police button".

    6. Re:Grab your proxies boys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's my friend here on facebook and... umm... She's a Witch!

  21. I'm waiting for the day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when we start getting IMs / emails / messages on social networks from the police

  22. What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny

    You used to be cool, dude. You used to be out partying all night, thumbing your nose at the Man, man. What happened? It's like you just woke up as a geezer. What's next, bro? The Anti Hippity Hop Music Played Too Loud By Those Kids On My Lawn Act 2010?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  23. Around the drain we go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't believe how much this country has changed. 15-20 years ago, the average Australian had a completely different attitude & outlook on life. We were easy going & resilient.

    Nowadays, we're all about giving up our civil liberties, protecting the children from the throngs of pedophiles, buying houses that are well outside our paygrade, sueing people for nothing & basically being a pack of selfish, self-righteous bitches.

    The Australian mentality is quickly perishing, along with the accent.

    1. Re:Around the drain we go... by Bill+Dog · · Score: 1

      Same with the American mentality.

      It's been 1 minute since you last successfully posted a comment

      (Oh gosh, how horrible, someone should alert the police.)

      --
      Attention zealots and haters: 00100 00100
    2. Re:Around the drain we go... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Congrats on turning British. Enjoy your new reality.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    3. Re:Around the drain we go... by Cryacin · · Score: 1

      Where'd that link go I saw earlier.... http://nooooooooooooooo.com/

      --
      Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
    4. Re:Around the drain we go... by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 1

      NNNNOOOOOOOOO

      I want to go to Australia before the accent disappears. It's totally hot.

      Don't turn into America, please.

  24. and while they're at it by sonciwind · · Score: 1

    can you add a 'Dislike' button, FCS.

  25. Administrative Nightmare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aussie coppers dumb as ever.

    I'd love to see this go ahead, just to see my taxpayer money being wasted of hundreds of thousands of false/misleading complaints...

  26. Don't you already have one? by Entropius · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Here in the US we've got something similar, and I bet the Aussies do too.

    It's not on your computer, but it's on your phone, and has been for a while. You can pick up your phone and dial 911, and instantly get to talk to the police. You can use this to report crimes, ask for medical help, or even ask someone to come put out a fire! And this was /before/ the Internets, even.

    Why the hell should Facebook have to provide yet another way to get in touch with the cops?

    1. Re:Don't you already have one? by ErikZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      911? THREE buttons?

      What is this? 1950's technology?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Don't you already have one? by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "Why the hell should Facebook have to provide yet another way to get in touch with the cops?"

      They don't, it's a request not a law.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  27. psychological marshmellows by rubycodez · · Score: 1

    maybe the state can come and put them in adult diapers and feed them from a nipple too

    reminds me of the uproar last week over some celebrity cunt using "rape" as a euphemism for privacy violation by paparazzi. oh, the insensitivity! we're degenerating into a bunch of wussified pansies with giant chips on our shoulders searching for something by which to be gravely offended.

  28. Re:By any chance do they specify the button detail by TheJokeExplainer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Amber lamps, for those who didn't know, is a reference to Thomas Bruso (aka Epic Beard Man)'s African-American ghetto punk arch enemy whom he encountered in a bus ride.

    See video.

    After talking smack to Epic Beard Guy, harassing and then hitting him, Epic Beard Guy hit back at Amber Lamps, thus making Amber Lamps say "I need an amber lamps" because of his bleeding nose.

    --
    visit my pal the xkcd explainer!
  29. It's the "correct" usage that is the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Misused? It's the "correct" usage that is the problem...

    They (The governments, cops, the man, whatever) keep trying to lower the treshold of reporting a crime. In theory, this is a good thing: If a crime is committed against me, I might already be upset etc. and should not be forced to jump through additional hoops. However, reporting a crime is notable thing that should be carefully considered. I am not some right wing nutjob who thinks that government should never interfere and whatnot but if someone is harassing you online, you really should think carefully if there is some better way to deal with the situation than involve the cops and the justice system with all its weight! When we aren't talking about crimes that put you or someone you know in immediate danger (in which case you generally should call 911 or its equivalent, not use some online system that isn't designed for that fast response) I think that it is actually better if you are required to visit a police station, call it or at the very minium send a goddam e-mail! If the crime is so insignifcant that you can't be bothered to send an e-mail to report it, perhaps you shouldn't report it!

    Think about how people use Facebook. People use it after all the major events in life (break ups, etc.), during night when they are sleep deprived, after they haven consumed alcohol... And when only communicating with text there are plenty of possibilities for misunderstanding the other party (something that was meant as a joke can be misinterpreted and so on)... We really don't need effortless one-click-crime-reporting in that enviroment.

    1. Re:It's the "correct" usage that is the problem by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      What about a button on their f** police website instead of facebook then, you know, where it actually belongs?
      Can read the 200 above posts for the most probable answer to that ;)

  30. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

    We were too busy out partying all night, thumbing our nose at the Man to elect decent (so far as the word can apply) politicians?

    --
    Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  31. Crimes on Facebook? by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

    Is it Lord Humongous? Time to call Mel Gibson!

  32. Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by mangu · · Score: 1, Troll

    As for google - they have deliberately been sniffing WAP's - and the extent of that means that they may have been breaking a law which has existed for a very long time in Aus.

    Making it illegal to sniff WAPs seems dangerously close to - excuse me, Godwin - making it illegal to have Jewish grandparents. It seems that Australia has been, for a very long time as you say, a police state.

    1. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by delysid-x · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      What do you expect from a prison colony?

    2. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's illegal to open the little box at the end of my neigboor's driveway and "sniff" the contents of their mail. It's illegal to open a pit in the footpath and "sniff" the contents of a telephone call....

      I suppose if I repeatedly hit myself in the head with a hammer I could eventually understand how those type of privacy laws equate to Nazi eugenics but seeing that I live in a police state someone would probably lock me up for seditious use of a carpentary tool before I managed to properly educate myself.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    3. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's illegal to open the little box at the end of my neigboor's driveway and "sniff" the contents of their mail. It's illegal to open a pit in the footpath and "sniff" the contents of a telephone call...

      The problem with your analogies is that they involve interaction well beyond what's going on in this case. With the mail, you have to open the mailbox, remove mail, and presumably open up envelopes to "sniff" the mail. With the telephone system, you're going a few steps even further. No sort of interaction is going on with wireless network sniffing.

      To make your mail analogy work, we'd have to rework the mail system. We'd toss out mailboxes. Instead, there's a bulletin board. You tack your mail up on that when sending or receiving mail. If you're not too picky, you're just tacking up post cards. Anyone who's passing by who cares to look can see not only that you have a mail board up, but what you're using it for. Of course, some people have an issue with this - or are simply following trends set for them. They've taken to folding their post in half before tacking it to the board (WEP). Casual drive-by observers, such as Google, now can only tell that you've got a post board up and what it's called. They can see that you're using it. But beyond that, it takes effort to walk up to the board and unfold the message to read it (WEP being relatively trivial to decrypt depending on the details). Those in the post board industry weren't happy with that and developed envelopes that make it even more difficult to read your neighbors mail (WPA / WPA2). Most people are using these envelopes by default even if they don't understand why - it's the trendy thing to do (and most access point hardware has you set it up by default). All people would probably use these envelopes if they understood what's involved. A few people are running around screaming that Google looked at their post board - they're the same ones upset that a picture was taken of their front door.

    4. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "No sort of interaction is going on with wireless network sniffing."

      Yeah right, wifi transactions somehow manage to pop-up on my computer screen and display the packet contents without any kind of interaction from me. What google did is possibly illegal but nobody is going to serve time because of it. Worse case is a fine and a court order to destroy any illegally acquired data, best case is the laws are clarified through precedent. However, in case you missed it the first time, my original point was; none of this is remotely analogous to nazi eugenics.

    5. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Doh! Didn't want to post AC...

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    6. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by pookemon · · Score: 0

      I see you subscribe to Googles claim that they "did it accidentally". Despite the fact that they (a) wrote their own software to do it, (b) Used a 3rd party piece of software to do it and (c) setup and configured the software to do it. Based on your ideas to make looking at someone elses mail legal you would have to drive around with a huge street sweeper, sucking the mail out of the letter boxes and doing so while "Not knowing that the street sweeper is actually there".

      The fact is that if Google have broken the law - then the investigation will find that and Google will be held accountable. However this detracts from the original point that this article is nothing to do with creating new laws - it is all to do with an EXISTING law that has been there for a very long time.

      It's like complaining that investigating someone regarding the theft of a car is creating a new law. OMG what a draconian state this is, a new law is being created to attempt to pin the fact that they dared to drive a car that wasn't theirs.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    7. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I see you subscribe to Googles claim that they "did it accidentally".

      More or less, yes. I do. I've done the same thing with Kismet. I've been interested in what SIDs I can find and, by default, have captured some random amount of data in the process. I wouldn't be surprised to find out Google did the same thing - especially since Kismet seems to be part of their tool kit.

      As for the law being new or old - not really worried about that. If Australia makes this illegal, too bad for Australian citizens. And I'll be sure to be extra careful next time I visit.

    8. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, wifi transactions somehow manage to pop-up on my computer screen and display the packet contents without any kind of interaction from me.

      And all of that is passive. There is no interaction. If Google was breaking the encryption of a given network, then pookemon's analogy would have been more apt.

      Yes - Google had to look to see what they saw. But there's nothing that indicates Google was interested in the network traffic itself (beyond SIDs, MACs, etc.). And even if they were, and I'd find that disturbing, I'd have to admit I'd find it no more outrageous than Google indexing password files it's spiders saw on incorrectly configured web servers.

      However, in case you missed it the first time, my original point was; none of this is remotely analogous to nazi eugenics.

      Fair enough. I agree on that point. I don't like the concept of a law that would make (say) Kismet illegal. But it's a far cry from death camps.

    9. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by pookemon · · Score: 0

      If Australia makes this illegal, too bad for Australian citizens

      See, you've completely missed the point. If it is illegal - then it's already illegal. Period. Finito. Stop.

      That's why these things get investigated - rather than legislated.

      Investigated

      Say it 3 times. Think about it.

      And if you drive around with deliberately installed software that is designed to collect information which is illegal to collect then you are breaking the law.

      A NEW LAW IS NOT BEING CREATED AN EXISTING LAW IS BEING INVESTIGATED

      Bloody hell.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    10. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      If Google was breaking the encryption of a given network, then pookemon's analogy would have been more apt.

      Sorry - that was your analogy. :P

    11. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      What you're missing is that I'm not missing that point. Like I said - whether the law is new or old, don't much care. It's still an inane law. ;)

    12. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "And all of that is passive. There is no interaction."

      In the same way that a guy with a fleet of fishing trawlers is passively collecting fish but the guy with a fly rod is interacting with them?

      Contrary to what you may think, I also don't find what google has done outrageous, but I would like the current legality of the practice cleared up so geeks like you and I know where we stand. I don't see anyone with any sort of political clout suggesting we outlaw sniffers. I see a perfectly reasonable investigation into the practice to determine if google broke existing laws.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    13. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's illegal to open the little box at the end of my neigboor's driveway and "sniff" the contents of their mail. It's illegal to open a pit in the footpath and "sniff" the contents of a telephone call....

      Spoken like someone who has absolutely zero idea of what he's talking about. You're comparing apples to oranges, it's not even remotely the same thing.

      An ACCURATE analogy would be "It's not illegal for me to sit on my porch and watch my neighbors sending smoke signals, so why should it be illegal for me to sit on my porch and watch my neighbor's Wi-Fi signals?"

    14. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      In the same way that a guy with a fleet of fishing trawlers is passively collecting fish but the guy with a fly rod is interacting with them?

      Not at all. Your analogy seems more focused on magnitude. After all, the fishermen are certainly interacting with the waters and fish (medium and data) involved. I would say it's closer to whale watching. You need to go to a location where the whales can be found. And then you have to look for them. You might employ tools like a boat, binoculars, and whale-spotting guide. But seeing a whale surface has no impact on the whale's activities and doesn't involve getting the whale to do anything that it wasn't already doing on it's own.

      Contrary to what you may think, I also don't find what google has done outrageous, but I would like the current legality of the practice cleared up so geeks like you and I know where we stand. I don't see anyone with any sort of political clout suggesting we outlaw sniffers. I see a perfectly reasonable investigation into the practice to determine if google broke existing laws.

      Pity it takes lots of posturing from Government officials to define the legal standing of an activity. :)

    15. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      And I believe that eating oranges is dangerously close to owning a car that is purple.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    16. Re:Is sniffing WAPs a crime? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "Pity it takes lots of posturing from Government officials to define the legal standing of an activity. :)"

      Yes, it's one of the less plesurable facts of life.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  33. The Government has no money by mangu · · Score: 1

    charge the gov't for the costs to put it up there and have at it.

    You mean charge the taxpayers, as in you and me, right? I disagree.

  34. More importantly, what's the investigation like? by weston · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this would result in anything but meaningless spamming of that "button".

    Meaningless? No, it could probably be used for quite meaningful harassment of someone you don't like. Maybe even someone you barely know.

    It'd be like Slashdot moderation, except instead of "-1, I don't like what you're saying," it'd be "-1, I'd like to give the police the pretext to access your accounts and search your house."

    Unless, of course, there's a different set of rules for investigations triggered by this...

  35. AFP is like the FBI by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just as a note,

    The AFP or Australian Federal Police is not just the 'Australian Police' like the title misleads you to believe. They are known as 'the feds' and would be most similar to what Americans know as the FBI. And then there's ASIO which is the Australian Security Intelligence Organiasation and is akin to the CIA and NSA.

    So yeah, the AFP ain't your local cop shop.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:AFP is like the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for here in the Australian Capital Territory (and some other special places like Jervis Bay, Christmas Island, Cocos Island etc), where they *are* our local cops too.

    2. Re:AFP is like the FBI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ASIO is closer to the FBI's NSB. ASIS on the other hand is CIA and DSD is the NSA analogue, though with drastically smaller budgets than the secret shops in the US.

      We share the same room 641a though, seeing as 90% net traffic goes US-ward, and we're the NSA's gimps with two ECHELON installations in the middle of nowhere.

  36. Brilliant idea by fragMasterFlash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pranksters would NEVER target such a mechanism to trigger a wave of false reports. Such shenanigans would never happen in this day and age.

  37. Already know the outcome. by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    It will just end up putting a bunch of fat-finger drunks behind bars for "inappropriate use of emergency infrastructure".

  38. Can I use the alarm button on HuffingtonPost? by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1

    It seems to me that web users would be hitting this button a lot as the design of most webpages classifies as an "online crime."

  39. Oh... by JxcelDolghmQ · · Score: 1

    It's Australia.

  40. Not a completely insane idea actually. by jd.schmidt · · Score: 1

    First I am glad they asked Facebook as opposed to telling them. But in truth they the police should just make their own plug in, sort of an online 911 gadget, then it could work at any time on the web. I don't know how useful the information will be and I am not sure how much I would trust a police based plug in (and a million other things)! However the cool thing about the internet is you can give crazy ideas a try. Face it, those "email the FBI to report fraud" addresses are mostly data collection, but even collecting data is worth while.

    Cop chat?

  41. Accountability? by Anderson_Mind · · Score: 1

    As an add-on in a mobile app, something like this could be an panic button that could be used anywhere, if you could guarantee user and police accountability. Gps tagging could pinpoint the location. But as it stands it seems to lack too much accountability and security. If there was a cancel option, what would stop an attacker from canceling the call after he subdued his victim? If not, there would be far too many accidental calls I think. perhaps people would be willing to live with one of the two options, and I suppose its better to stop some crimes rather than none. I'd rather see how this plays out in Britain before we start it here, be technology doesnt stand still, there will never be a time when we "know the consequences." Its nice to have options, but this one concerns me.

    --
    iuventuti nil arduum
  42. If I were Facebook... by jweller · · Score: 1

    I would do it. The amount of mis-use would almost have to convince the Police that this is a horrible idea.

    Troll the Trolls.

  43. Re:By any chance do they specify the button detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Close. Amber Lamps is the girl with the headphones.

  44. Police Brutality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hopefully this red button will be used to point to youtube videos demonstrating police brutality and we can finally put some bullies behind bars.

    Of course, they'll probably arrest the youtube user instead.

    Where's the shadow government, when you neeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed it?

  45. Re:By any chance do they specify the button detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol... WTF'ery! Oddly precise description of most modern news.

  46. Why don't..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the police make their own website. WTF?

  47. really by chronoss2010 · · Score: 1

    and i has picture of the commercial with the big panic button with words FACEPLANT on it

  48. so if im not australian can i push it all day by chronoss2010 · · Score: 1

    i can see rapid response for the first few hundred pushes LOL

  49. A single click you say?? by jimmyfrank · · Score: 1

    Amazon probably has a patent for that.

  50. and if i live in canada by chronoss2010 · · Score: 1

    i swear ill sit here for a hour a day wailing on that button what they gonna do deport me for ILLEGAL PUSHING OF some button haha riiiight

  51. So whats next? by War+Camel · · Score: 1

    An arrest offender button for the cops to use?

  52. Simple answer. by _KiTA_ · · Score: 1

    "No."

  53. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by dakameleon · · Score: 1

    That and the compulsory voting + preference distribution system of elections means that governments effectively change on the back of "marginal" seats, almost all in the suburban belts of the major cities where the votes of "concerned parents" is buyable with a few tax kickbacks (Family Payment Part A and B anyone? No not you, you degenerate working single young male) and a show of concern for the degeneration of society.

    --
    Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
  54. 1800 1234 00 by beaverdownunder · · Score: 2, Informative

    This _is_ a country that has a toll-free snitch line to report 'suspicious activity', and frequent advertisements to remind everybody it exists -- "Be alert, but not alarmed..."

  55. Re:More importantly, what's the investigation like by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    it'd be "-1, I'd like to give the police the pretext to access your accounts and search your house. Unless, of course, there's a different set of rules for investigations triggered by this..."

    No, same rules, the police in Oz are still bound by the quaint notion of applying to the courts.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  56. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by indiechild · · Score: 2, Informative

    Australia has always been on the conservative side in culture, religion and politics, despite the national stereotype of being open and fun-loving. In that sense, we've got a lot in common with the US. I'll go so far to say that Australia is a real prude these days.

  57. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by TapeCutter · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sorry to burst your bubble but no new laws are required to ask facebook to install a link to the cops. Also we already have an "Anti Hippity Hop Music Played Too Loud By Those Kids On My Lawn Act", we call it "trespassing", so get off my lawn and take your Hippity-hop band with you.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  58. Political pressure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not at all surprised to read this story considering recent events in Australia.
    The fact is that a couple of weeks ago a young girl was murdered by someone she met on facebook.
    Naturally people are going to want some action taken on this issue so that their child isn't the next victim of the horrible, nasty interweb.

    This being an election year, it is more important than ever that the government looks like its doing something useful to handle issues such as this. So they yell at the AFP to do something about it, and some bright spark there comes up with this wonderful idea which will no doubt fail miserably because (amongst other reasons) there is no way they can investigate every 2nd twit on facebook that reports their friend as a joke. But at least they appear to be doing something so that parents don't have to take responsibility themselves to make sure their child isn't meeting up with strangers from the internet.

  59. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by syousef · · Score: 1

    You used to be cool, dude. You used to be out partying all night, thumbing your nose at the Man, man. What happened? It's like you just woke up as a geezer. What's next, bro? The Anti Hippity Hop Music Played Too Loud By Those Kids On My Lawn Act 2010?

    We wish. It's more like the "We just got a frontal lobotomy" Act 2010

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  60. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    We moved to Hollywood because there clearly weren't enough unshaven thugs making historically inaccurate movies.

    When we got back to check our mail, conservatives were squatting in our homes and pawing through - sorry, banning - our pr0n.

  61. Awesome idea. by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

    I for one can't wait for this to be implemented. What could possiblie go wrong? I feel safer already.

  62. not to be that guy, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's not a tag

  63. Predictable yet amusing all the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Oz is not part of the the US (yet).

    This is one of the most common phrases spoken and written by Australians. It's the "yet" part which is so funny.

    Despite all of Australia's best efforts to (re)model itself as The United States of Australia, you are nothing like Americans and your nation is nothing like America, however much you may wish to believe otherwise.

    Some Americans feel touched or flattered by your desire to be us, but most of us just scratch our head in bemusement. The thing of it is that you're not at all like us, and have no good reason to be us, so why do you want to be -- and try so hard to be -- American?

    Sure, the United States of America is a "great nation" in many respects, and I guess we as that nation are still worthy of some grudging respect and admiration (or not...), but we certainly aren't the 'be all and end all'...Yet as far as Australians are concerned America is the Holy Grail in too many ways to count.

    Be happy and proud to be Australian! You're a great bunch of people and you have some excellent beaches. What more could you ever really want out of life? :)

    1. Re:Predictable yet amusing all the same. by somersault · · Score: 1

      In this case, and probably most cases when people come out with that phrase, they don't say it as if it's a bad thing that they're different from the US.

      It's the US that's pushing for everyone else to be like them (one obvious example would be in the field of copyright law), not the other way round.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Predictable yet amusing all the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anybody who has ever visited Australia or lived there or among Australians knows it's true that Aussies really really REALLY want to be American even as they pretend to hate the US and Americans. Truly freaky IMHO to listen to Aussies flaming away at "yanks" even as they are desperately trying to BE yanks!

    3. Re:Predictable yet amusing all the same. by somersault · · Score: 1

      If you think the same thing about the UK then I can safely tell you that you're just reading things wrong. I appreciate certain aspects of America, but there are lots of things about it that I dislike too.

      I'd like to hear an example of how you think another country is trying to "be American". I'm not saying it isn't possible, but at the same time I think it's dumb to act as if because a nation adopts one aspect of American culture - let's say "fast food" - that they are trying to be America. It is natural for humans to copy other ideas that they see as beneficial. You might as well say anyone that eats a pizza is trying to be Italian, or that anyone who drinks tea wants to be Chinese.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Predictable yet amusing all the same. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia has aped the US in essentially every way right from the beginning. Not just the obvious like "culture", but politically, economically, everything.

      The ultimate success for any Australian is to emigrate to the USA and become a citizen of that country. There is simply no greater honour or achievement.

    5. Re:Predictable yet amusing all the same. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Yeah right, that's why American tourists are known to the locals as "croc food".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  64. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by JimboG · · Score: 1

    We're sorry man... here Mick went and punched a shark for you Surfer punches shark then catches wave We cool now? I'm just glad there's an election coming up so I can help vote the current government out.

  65. Thin end of the wedge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While reporting of problems and crimes is generally a good thing, this particular request goes much futher. First the private company is almost being told to put the button on the page. And I assume that the size colour and position will also have to be as 'requested'. But then there is talk of a law enforement rep on site! Nice, approved state minders helping you out.
    Finally the article shows a number of law bodies having a get together to discuss "work together to exert some pressure on the content service providers to assist law enforcement to gain better activity and better approach for them". Its not worded to clearly but basically "how can we force them to do what we want".

    Where did Aus go wrong, this should really ring alarms.

  66. Good idea, but it'll never work by Syberz · · Score: 1

    I don't know why everyone is moaning, I think that a "Report" button could be a good idea. Unfortunately it'll never work due to the large amount of false positives it would incur. You'd need quite a bit of people looking at what was reported in order to determine whether or not actions should be taken.

    --
    ~Syberz
  67. Just one question by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Exactly what crimes can you commit online via facebook? The only one I can think of is a trojan app, but methinks the first thing a trojan would do is disable the panic button!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  68. Hah. by PriitM · · Score: 1

    Children are SO going to abuse this button. Also, I'm wondering who is going to work through all those reports. Where is this enormous manpower taken from?

  69. Re:By any chance do they specify the button detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    amber lamps is the babe with the headphones

  70. Re:What the hell, Australia? What the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You used to be cool, dude. You used to be out partying all night, thumbing your nose at the Man, man. What happened?

    I hear the women there are shaving now. Now I'm not saying that a decrease in female body hair causes countries to go all batshit fundamentalist, but the US has had a similar progression from the 60s to now... Fundamentalism also seems to correlate with an increase in male bodyhair... Just who is behind this global shaving conspiracy? And what will happen when women start shaving their heads?

  71. if there was some oversight on this, might be good by bitbin · · Score: 1

    obviously the risk of abuse is there, however if implemented correctly, I think something like this could be very helpful. I've heard of incidents when people post suicide notes on their FB statuses and if there was a way for a friend to react and alert FB that information can often be helpful to the medical services professionals that may end up helping the person (such as drugs they've taken, etc)