Slashdot Mirror


The Star Wars Kid Is Back

An anonymous reader writes "It was eight years ago that Ghyslain Raza slashed his way into our hearts with his Star Wars Kid video. Sadly, Raza suffered from severe bullying and abuse for his video and eventually ended up in a psychiatric ward for children. However, his video was seen 1 billion times and multiple thousands of geeks came immediately to his defense. While those must have been the worst years of his life, things are now looking up."

195 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. Wow, how sad is it that by Scott+Lockwood · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    you used to hear these things on slashdot FIRST, sometimes several days ahead of the mainstream media, and now slashdot is at least a week behind. This is old, old news at this point.

    --
    But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
    1. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by RabbitWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's your fault for reading it somewhere else and not immediately posting it here. Ask not what Slashdot can do for you, ask what you can do for Slashdot!

    2. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by twistedsymphony · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's your fault for reading it somewhere else and not immediately posting it here. Ask not what Slashdot can do for you, ask what you can do for Slashdot!

      I used to do that all the time, but I got tired of my submissions getting passed over for days/(weeks) and then once the rest of the major online media outlets decided it was worthy to report someone else's late submission got pushed though.

      Why should I waste my time with submissions that never go though when making snarky comments is infinitely more entertaining and rewarding?

    3. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by howman · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Funny how in the last number of years /. has moved down my list of bookmarks from top sopt to check in order to 5 or 6th in the list...

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
    4. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's because they are submitted on time, but the editors are so fricking lazy that things will sit waiting for submission for a week at a time.

      Honestly, it's not that hard to dig through the submissions, I have looked at the firehose and they are not getting 80 submissions a second.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by dintech · · Score: 1

      I'm genuinely interested in what the others are. Care to share a couple?

      (fark and 4chan need not apply. :) )

    6. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Zerth · · Score: 1

      And which sites, exactly, have taken the top spots?

    7. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And thus the appeal of digg or reddit or metafilter or really any sort of site that uses user-submitted content that does it in a timely manner or has some sort of quality control -- cf also dupe stories (which are so common that they're literally a joke).

      Slashdot's admin/editors take note.

    8. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by GarryFre · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I too used to write stuff and post it to slashdot, or find something interesting and have it rejected while stuff that was not half as interesting got through. ... Oh some of the stuff I posted I considered not that great, but I figured, what the hey, if the other stuff gets through maybe this will. I gave up. I really do think its a club ... if you are not part of the club you don't get your stuff published but I didn't come here to talk about this, I came to comment on that kid being bullied.... In high school, assholes abound so much that instead of acne they should be sprouting assholes instead of little bumps. Too many punks getting away with insanity. They should have patted the kid on the back and told him it was a cool video - Which it was!!!! Maybe instead of having emotional damage he might have started feeling better about himself and work out and be buffed up or become the next Spielberg or George Lucas.

      --
      www.Migrainesoft.com - Computer giving you a headache? We can fix that!
    9. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by hey! · · Score: 1

      Not very sad.

      Hold on, that was one of those rhetorical thingammies, where you pretend to lack information but are actually setting up to make a lame point, wasn't it?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    10. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Mr.+DOS · · Score: 1

      Reddit is very current, and the comment system, while not as good as Slashdot, isn't entirely intolerable.

    11. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by DeadChobi · · Score: 1

      Probably AL4A and Wikipedia

      --
      SRSLY.
    12. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by malloc · · Score: 1

      For me, Slashdot is still the top link in the Awesome bar, but it is being seriously challenged by:
      http://arstechnica.com/ and http://anandtech.com/

      --
      ___________________ I want to be free()!
    13. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      you used to hear these things on slashdot FIRST, sometimes several days ahead of the mainstream mediaa

      When did that EVER happen? I've been around since 99 and people were complaining about it back then!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    14. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Funny how in the last number of years /. has moved down my list of bookmarks from top sopt to check in order to 5 or 6th in the list...

      I feel that way, but it's because of overzealous fanboys and haters, not stories I can easily scroll past.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    15. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by wsanders · · Score: 1

      Google Reader's "Recommended Items" is currently doing this job for me.

      Plus, it is forcing me to be more intelligent in my browsing habits; the all seeing eye of Google encourages me to choose wisely so there is less random crap and more bona fide tech news on my list.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    16. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Forge · · Score: 4, Informative

      Slasdot's Admins and Editors don't read Slashdot anymore. If they did, they would have noticed the criticism years ago and mended their ways.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    17. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      That's really what keeps slashdot at the top of my list -- the comment system. Flawed as it may be, I've not found another one out there that's half as good.

    18. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by ronocdh · · Score: 1

      Why should I waste my time with submissions that never go though when making snarky comments is infinitely more entertaining and rewarding?

      Hi, you must not be new here!

    19. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Why should I waste my time with submissions that never go though when making snarky comments is infinitely more entertaining and rewarding?

      As measured in karma, of course.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    20. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      reddit is the dig of /.

    21. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2, Informative

      /. has never been a news breaker, except for things like CmdrTaco's proposal, Segan's meltdown over bombing Iraq and CmdrTaco's forced WoW name change.

      I've been here since it was Chips and Dips

    22. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Rival · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At the risk of sounding sentimental, what keeps me coming back to slashdot is the people. Granted, lots of new folks keep showing up here, but they tend to leave for more popular sites like Digg and Reddit. I'm fine with that; the Eternal September can just roll on by.

      I'm not in as much of a hurry as I once was, and a day or two isn't going to kill me. Plus, time does wonders for weeding out the interesting from the merely sensational. This story might not be the best example of that, but even when it's not "stuff that matters," if it is somehow related to nerds and we've had a few days to hear and think about it, then the discussion here is likely to be more insightful.

      Or not. :-)

      Either way, it's nice to come by here and see some long-standing friends whom I've never met personally. Whether the discussion of the day is logical disourse, blatant fanboyism, heated rhetoric, well-earned snarkery, complaining about editors, or just lighthearted BS about whatever rabbit trail we've found ourselves on, I know I am in for an enjoyable time.

      So sit back, read, laugh, be challenged, challenge someone else, troll if you must, meme if you can, respect your elders, respect your youngsters, relax and have a good time.

    23. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by goofyspouse · · Score: 1

      It is even more funny that you haven't moved away from bookmarks to an RSS option such as Google Reader. Manually checking bookmarked links for fresh reading material is more 2001 than Windows XP.

    24. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by howman · · Score: 1

      slippery brick is up there as is anandtech. The Red Ferret Journal gets a nod and designnotes by michael surtess is pretty cool too. Seems like even Gizmodo gets news sooner, but i really hate the comment system over there so I don't read them. That and a bunch of really good google notifications.

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
    25. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by howman · · Score: 1

      Sentimental from the poster with a 5 digit /. id... lol

      --
      flinging poop since 1969
    26. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      I read someone criticizing Slashdot last week on another website, and now here that same criticism is on Slashdot! A week later! You are totally right.

    27. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by unity100 · · Score: 1

      It's your fault for reading it somewhere else and not immediately posting it here. Ask not what Slashdot can do for you, ask what you can do for Slashdot!

      I used to do that all the time, but I got tired of my submissions getting passed over for days/(weeks) and then once the rest of the major online media outlets decided it was worthy to report someone else's late submission got pushed though.

      same here for me.

    28. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by game+kid · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they do and just hate people.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    29. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      The comment system at Reddit simply sucks. It sucks so badly that it puts me off even going to that site. You can't even get the site to send you an e-mail when someone replies, can you?

      Also, Reddit has too many articles flooding you. At least that's my impression. I feel it's easier to get a quick overview of what's new at Slashdot because there's simply less content. I don't feel as overwhelmed.

      But the comment system at Reddit... That's the abomination, evil incarnate, that keeps me away.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    30. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by treeves · · Score: 1

      What about that Scientology page deletion thingy?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    31. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I forgot about that. The Thetan-loons were going after a ton of sites back then, I just ignored /. that day.

      Looking back, I'd just started a new job and my boss went to the ER that day.

      http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/01/03/16/1256226.shtml

      Sengan going off about Operation Desert Fox was way more memorable for me

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=98/12/16/1930206

    32. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by Yert · · Score: 1

      Agreed - half of the reason I still hit /. on a daily basis is the comments. Some are truly informative, and some are simply comedy gold. :) Besides, clevernickname still comments from time to time, does he not?

      --
      Truck driver, plumber, Linux systems engineer.
    33. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Well said

    34. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by treeves · · Score: 1

      And, you know, I thought about it *after* I posted (I must not be new here!) - it wasn't really a case of Slashdot breaking news, it was Slashdot making news.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    35. Re:Wow, how sad is it that by NotBorg · · Score: 1

      More likely they're hiding behind memes such as "You can't please everybody" and the general observation that people are overly dramatic and often a bit off base "on the Internet." Slashdot is still popular so "we must be doing it right" may be another hide behind. These are somewhat fair. Its hard to quantify the necessity of change if you're reasonably popular and relevant.

      At any rate, I think it's clear that most people read /. for the user commentary rather than for the "instant out" news. Even if its late it still gives a good jumping off point for discussion. And being "late" can have a positive effect on the discussion. People come to the discussion with better informed opinions and insight that is very often missing from other mediums like such as Digg.

      I still read Digg though. In the end one should just stop expecting one medium to be the perfect solution and pull from multiple sources to even out the strengths and weaknesses any one medium.

      Also consider that the "criticism" is often out of band and off topic. None of this, for example, has anything to do with "The Star Wars Kid." It's hard not to discount it as noise and skip over it in pursuit of the discussion you clicked for in the first place.

      --
      I want this account deleted.
  2. Didn't he get an iPod? by wandazulu · · Score: 3, Informative

    As I recall, there was a group of people who contributed to buying him an iPod as a way of trying to show that not everyone who saw the video was laughing at him. Any idea whether he got it? TFA doesn't mention it.

    1. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I laughed at him. I laugh my ass off. I laughed for the same reason most people laughed. We''ve all done something that turned out to be massively embarrassing.

      If you say you didn't laugh, I suspect you are impaired or a liar.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't, I thought the video was awesome.

    3. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by daemonenwind · · Score: 1

      I seem to recall that they collected so much money, they not only bought him an iPod, but a mac laptop as well.

    4. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by tgd · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now we're laughing at you, instead.

    5. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have an impairment called "empathy". That video made me sad, because I could imagine the position that kid was in.

      Sucks to be me, I guess.

    6. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I doubt an iPod is going to mean anything to him compared to the $250k or whatever settlement he got out of the lawsuits resulting from the video..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by bitt3n · · Score: 4, Funny

      I have an impairment called "empathy". That video made me sad, because I could imagine the position that kid was in.

      Sucks to be me, I guess.

      Sucks to be me, I guess.

      I tried to feel bad for you, but I just ended up laughing.

    8. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by Forge · · Score: 1

      Which was his goal old timer.
      BTW: Seen Meept lately?

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    9. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by meustrus · · Score: 1

      About the only funny thing about this is that he thought it was a good idea to make a video. That's actually funny in the wow-that's-weird sense. But for the exact reason you think everything else was funny, I'm just bored. It's unremarkable. We've all done something like that, and if not in public then in private when we thought it'd be fun to pretend to be the world's greatest swordsman or marksman or whatever. This kind of make-believe is expected of younger children, but somehow I suspect that if you saw a picture of a 7-year-old in a Spiderman costume pretending to throw webs, you'd laugh hysterically and pass it on.

      Bottom line, I had never seen the video before, and now I think I at least would have chuckled a bit if I was rick-rolled instead.

      --
      I sometimes ask revealing, often ignorant-seeming questions. Maybe they're harder to answer than you think.
    10. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by hodet · · Score: 1

      I felt bad for him. I don't get kicks "herd laughing" at random strangers. The internet is littered with the corpses of kids on the wrong side of internet meme's. What is the point? And I was no nerdy kid at school either. I was a big kid who could throw a punch to the face of any punk that tried to punk me. Some people ask to be made fun of and deserve it for their attention whoring ways, but Star Trek kid was just lost in his own imagination which unfortunately got forwarded to a billion people.

    11. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by hodet · · Score: 1

      oops, StarWars kid, not StarTrek.....go ahead make fun of me punk!

    12. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by metacell · · Score: 1

      You are not alone.

    13. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Don't tell me you don't even get a laugh out of those America's Funniest Home Videos where little kids are attacked by animals and elderly people fall down stairs??!!

    14. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I plan on waiting outside his retirement home decades from now and giving him an atomic-wedgie.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    15. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by eyrieowl · · Score: 1

      i don't think the point was necessarily b/c it was buying him off, but a gesture of good-will and sympathy. But I don't know, I wasn't involved.

    16. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by somersault · · Score: 1

      Yeah I know, it just seems a bit of a lame gesture if the guy actually had to go to a mental institution because of all of this. I suppose something is better than nothing though, and if hundreds of thousands of people chipped in it would actually have some meaning. I think the video is pretty cool, and the fallout of it is probably the biggest effect this guy is going to have on the world, it's more than most people will ever achieve in a way :P I did exactly the same kind of stuff messing around with sticks when I was his age.. I didn't film it, but I probably looked just as silly xD

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      You're not alone in that....

      An over-active empathy for this kind of thing can be horribly destructive to yourself though.

      It is ok to laugh at the star wars kid, but being an asstard to him like some were is not.

    18. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by Zrako · · Score: 1

      As I recall, there was a group of people who contributed to buying him an iPod as a way of trying to show that not everyone who saw the video was laughing at him. Any idea whether he got it? TFA doesn't mention it.

      He not only got an iPod from this group but also $3600 worth of giftcards to Futureshop's online store. http://waxy.org/2003/05/finding_the_sta/ http://waxy.org/2003/07/shipping_the_st/

    19. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by Sperbels · · Score: 1

      I laughed and felt bad for him too. I'm not sure why you can't do both.

    20. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Just my impressions, but he struck me as the kind of person that would get bullies and made fun of a lot in high school even without the video. Come on, this is slashdot - it's not like we don't know what those kids look like...

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    21. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by cyphercell · · Score: 1

      Not big on logic are you?

      --
      Under the influence of Post-Cyberpunk Gonzo Journalism
    22. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by BitterOak · · Score: 1

      I have an impairment called "empathy". That video made me sad, because I could imagine the position that kid was in.

      Sucks to be me, I guess.

      How long have you been on the Internet? I see people doing far, far more embarrassing and stranger things on YouTube and Chatroulette all the time. People with as thin a skin as the Star Wars kid shouldn't be making embarrassing videos in the first place. Sorry if I sound cold, but just browse YouTube for about five minutes if you don't believe me.

      And please don't add that the comparison is invalid because people post their YouTube videos voluntarily. Many such videos feature parties with people doing silly things in the background all the time. I'm sure they didn't all give their consent to have the video posted!

      --
      If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
    23. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by aurispector · · Score: 1
      --
      I have mod points. The reign of terror begins now.
    24. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by XCondE · · Score: 1

      I have an impairment called "empathy". That video made me sad, because I could imagine the position that kid was in.

      Sucks to be me, I guess.

      Sucks to be me, I guess.

      I tried to feel bad for you, but I just ended up laughing.

      Me too.

    25. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      And who was the idiot who said videogames lowered the possibility to feel empathy?

      --
      This is blinging
    26. Re:Didn't he get an iPod? by pete-classic · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why, either. In all seriousness, I see your point. And I'm not at all above schadenfreude. But this particular video is just completely unfunny to me. I cringe. Some of the ACs in this thread aren't completely off the mark. There, but for the grace of God go I, I guess.

      And I'm not judging people who do laugh at it. I do take issue with the idea that there's something wrong with me because I don't.

      -Peter

  3. Hmm... by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

    He looks cute older.

    1. Re:Hmm... by RabbitWho · · Score: 1

      And he has so many coolness points, when you get to 19 and you leave school suddenly being a nerd is the coolest thing to be! Man if that's not cool I don't wanna know what is.

    2. Re:Hmm... by zwei2stein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Of course, he is lawyer now.

      Ain't this fate of most bullied nerds? They get attractive ... jobs later. (And opportunity for "lolno, not dating you" to what where popular girls at school)

      --
      -- Technology for the sake of technology is as pathetic as eschewing technology because it's technology.
    3. Re:Hmm... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      "Lawyer" is not an attractive job...

    4. Re:Hmm... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      And he has so many coolness points, when you get to 19 and you leave school suddenly being a nerd is the coolest thing to be!

      Only now he's not a nerd, he's a lawyer.

    5. Re:Hmm... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      "Lawyer" is not an attractive job...

      Said like a man who has never met a woman.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    6. Re:Hmm... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Says a lawyer who meets plenty of women.


      (Yes, the AC post is mine too, forgot to log in).

    7. Re:Hmm... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I the words of the great philosopher, "Chicks dig guys with money."

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  4. Actually... by FlyByPC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are millions of lawyers, but there is only one Star Wars Kid. Dare to be different!

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Actually... by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      Wait. There's millions of them?!?! Is the bottom of the ocean going to be large enough?

  5. Glad things turned out well by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was worried that his negative experience would turn him into a ruthless, soulless shell of a human being. Thank god he became a lawyer instead.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Glad things turned out well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was worried that his negative experience would turn him into a ruthless, soulless shell of a human being. Thank god he became a lawyer instead.

      When we last saw him, he was but the client. Now he is the lawyer.

    2. Re:Glad things turned out well by cranky_chemist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Make all the lawyer jokes you want, but if this kid had picked up a gun and smoked 4 or 5 of his tormentors, we'd all be having a very different conversation right now. That he has managed to do anything productive with his life is a testament to his mental and moral fortitude.

    3. Re:Glad things turned out well by lordmetroid · · Score: 1

      Becomming a lawyer creates no value to the society, there is no production that occurs.

    4. Re:Glad things turned out well by FreonTrip · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But as someone who knows the ins and outs of the law, you are qualified to defend those who do produce value from those who would exploit or stop them.

    5. Re:Glad things turned out well by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You can destroy the Emperor, he has foreseen it. Join me, and we can chase ambulances together as father and son!

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    6. Re:Glad things turned out well by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1, Informative

      What is sad is that he has joined an organization to maintain 'cultural heritage' in Quebec. In Quebec people who like to maintain cultural heritage like to implement things like Quebec's language law. A law already rebuked by the UN human rights courts that force parents to send their kids to all french schools, force store owners to put only french signs on their store fronts (or be fined into bankruptcy), and yield any of your own cultural heritage to the fancophone Quebec majority. Think 'A French Version of Right Wing Texas North.' Except as extreme left wing... bringing it closer to the same ideological enforcement as other historical societies. There are even cases where french cultural extremists have firebombed or tried to firebomb businesses that tried to defy the language laws and put English (and other language) signs on the front of their buildings. In Quebec, cultural heritage takes on a darker meaning. I'm not saying he is this camp, but be wary when you hear 'cultural heritage' in reference to Quebec. It is possible it refers to their ubiquitous mind police.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    7. Re:Glad things turned out well by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for lawyers, gay men and women wouldn't be allowed to marry in Canada. Tell me, honestly, that you believe that providing equal rights doesn't create value for society.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    8. Re:Glad things turned out well by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      If it weren't for lawyers, it would've never been illegal for them to marry in the first place.

    9. Re:Glad things turned out well by abigor · · Score: 1

      Lawyers don't create legislation, you dolt.

    10. Re:Glad things turned out well by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Did we ever stop to consider that maybe having the body of law so complex that it is completely incomprehensible to the vast majority of the people that it applies to might be a BAD thing?

    11. Re:Glad things turned out well by brennanw · · Score: 1

      Sure it's a bad thing. But that's a separate matter: someone who understands the "bad thing" enough to help people who DON'T understand it is still doing something of value...

      --
      Eviscerati.Org: All Hail the Eviscerati
    12. Re:Glad things turned out well by treeves · · Score: 1

      But many legislators were lawyers first (e.g. 217/535 in the 109th Congress - what other profession is anywhere close to being so heavily represented?). And the people who enforce legislation (judicial) , and implement legislation (executive) are often lawyers.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    13. Re:Glad things turned out well by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The French being culturally arrogant snobs?!?!?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    14. Re:Glad things turned out well by jargonCCNA · · Score: 1

      I feel that the use of Leviticus and Deuteronomy to provide the original basis of the majority of Western law is the problem here.

      --
      Matthew G P Coe
      http://mgpcoe.blogspot.com/
    15. Re:Glad things turned out well by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      "If it weren't for religion..." you mean. Actually there might not be marriage at all if it weren't for religion and people wouldn't have any difference in standing whether they were part of a couple or not. Anybody?

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  6. Better Title: Return of the Jedi? by xednieht · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly this article was not submitted by a "true" Star Wars fan. Use the force dude, use the force.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:Better Title: Return of the Jedi? by MRe_nl · · Score: 1

      Agreed, The Star Wars Kid Strikes Back, Return of the Star Wars Kid, The Legal Menace, Attack of the Lawyers, Revenge of the Star Wars Kid, all would have been better imho.

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    2. Re:Better Title: Return of the Jedi? by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      A new hope?

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  7. Slashdot is NOT helping here... by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He was anonymous again. Took him 8 years. His 15 minutes of fame were finally forgotten. He could continue with his life.

    Now Slashdot and that other website (rtfa) put up his picture, location, job/study... which will show up in every google search for the "Star Wars Kid", forever linking his new life to that old one.

    It's quite disappointing to see that his address, email, phone number, and the name of his friends and girlfriend (if any) are missing. Can we all have that too please, so that it's easier to ruin the rest of his life too? :-)

    1. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by qoncept · · Score: 1

      name of his friends and girlfriend (if any)

      Heh, heh.

      --
      Whale
    2. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by EddyPearson · · Score: 1

      Too fucking right. Responsible journalism this is not. Idle or otherwise.

      --
      You feel sleepy. Close your eyes. The opinions stated above are yours. You cannot imagine why you ever felt otherwise.
    3. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Xacid · · Score: 1

      I find it comforting in a way...like a "look at me now, bitches".

      I wasn't laughing at you, Star Wars Kid, I was laughing with you - because like the rest of us here on Slashdot: We've probably done similiar if not sillier shit in our childhoods.

    4. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by SoupGuru · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He'll never be able to hide from it. He has to embrace it. Own it. "Yes, I'm the Star Wars kid. Thankfully, lightsaber skills aren't a requirement for this job!" Ha ha. We've all done stupid shit in our lives. His happened to be seen by a lot more people and that really sucks. I'm not saying it's easy but he has to come to terms with it.

      And who knows, maybe this news story is coming from him. Maybe he's finally ready to get back out there.

      Look at Tron Guy. He's owned it. Good lord, I would have wanted to lock myself away for a while after hearing what people were saying after seeing the pics. But he rolled with it. Of course, he was a bit more "mature" than a highschooler and that could explain the differences is how they dealed with their "fame".

      --
      What doesn't kill you only delays the inevitable
    5. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by tmk · · Score: 1

      Exactly what I thought when I saw it on engadget & Co.

    6. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Tolkien · · Score: 1

      1 billion people don't know who he is.

    7. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Morty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Aging changes perspective. For a high school kid, appearing as a fat, awkward kid in a famous internet video is epic shame. But for an adult angling to be a lawyer and a politician, *having appeared* some years before in a famous internet video is a great advantage. I rather think he has come to terms with his fame and is using it to his advantage. Good for him.

    8. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Vahokif · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, shame on him for not wanting to relive his most painful childhood memory every day.

    9. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You think it's bad for him, just think about what those poor Gosselin kids will have to go through. It will another 12 years before they finally escape being made fun of at a public school (maybe longer if Mommy continues to hold them back from full-time school so they can spend more time filming cool vacations)

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why not? Another /.'er does ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    11. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      My client is not the suspect you are looking for...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    12. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think that the guy sucks for not parlaying all that exposure into something.

      Spoken like a true marketing idiot. Not everyone is a fame whore and thinks that fame == $$. Think about it: if he wanted fame, he'd have uploaded the video himself. The kid is a nerd at heart and did something that he thought was cool -- and he had fun doing it. Yeah, I laughed when I saw the video, but I also thought it was pretty cool; there's nothing wrong with a kid indulging his sci-fi fantasy. He had fun making a tape then tossed it aside. How is it that he sucks just because he didn't react to his fame with dollar signs in his eyes? The "opportunities" you speak of are not necessarily opportunities to everyone. So he sucks because he doesn't have the greedy mindset that you have? Who the hell modded this "Insightful" ?!

    13. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      What was so painful about that childhood memory?

      I'm easily amused by the stupidest off-the-wall crap on youtube or elsewhere, but for the life of me I just don't get "the star wars kid" video. It's a young kid waving a stick around for a minute and 40 some seconds. I don't see how it's funny, entertaining, or embarrassing - no big deal really. Unless I'm missing something, I don't get what the fuss is all about. Lots of kids do lots of silly things, and many capture it on video.

    14. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      Unless I'm missing something, I don't get what the fuss is all about.

      It wasn't the video itself that was painful, it was the subsequent bullying that the video precipitated.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    15. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by NotOverHere · · Score: 1

      We've probably done similiar if not sillier shit in our childhoods.

      Most of us hopefully stopped doing such things long before we were 14...

      Hopefully some of us are still doing such things long after we were 14... with a life-lesson that you don't tape it unless you really want to share it.

    16. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      See also: the late Gary Coleman, who despite his best efforts had his entire life boiled down to a 4-word catch phrase even in the obituaries.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    17. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by way2trivial · · Score: 1
      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    18. Re:Slashdot is NOT helping here... by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Right. "Watchoo talkin' 'bout, Willis?". 4 words.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  8. The Darkside by AnonymousClown · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... he’s putting his litigious experience to some use, getting his law degree at McGill University in Montreal.

    So, he went to the Darkside.

    See what happens when you bully kids?

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:The Darkside by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      McGill is the Canadian Harvard. Definite Sith Lord material.

    2. Re:The Darkside by fishexe · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... he’s putting his litigious experience to some use, getting his law degree at McGill University in Montreal.

      So, he went to the Darkside.

      See what happens when you bully kids?

      You don't know the power of the dark side.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  9. High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't think he's alone when they say that the worst years of my life were, in fact, high school. Cliques full of assholes and status seeking social climbing butterflies pretty much achieved status by picking on people like me. I actually found the group of punks (smoking, piercings, tattoos, apathy, loud music, etc) to be the most welcoming group of people despite my lack of smoking, the fact that I listened to The Beatles and watched X-Files. The only people that seemed to really thrive in that crap were the popular kids and college was a welcomed change. I went from having four or five close friends in high school to entire crowds of people that I loved to talk to.

    Having been made fun of for reading Star Wars books in grade school, I sympathize with this kid though my pain was not on a global level like his. Still, I bet if you asked him now if he could go back and do things differently it would probably be better not to sue and instead milk that fifteen minutes by going on SNL or Conan O'Brien or even trying for a cameo in one of the Wayans Brothers' parody comedy flicks. Jesus, I bet he could make good money if he charged $5,000 per video and set up a site where he recorded himself doing his spiel and saying "Happy Birthday <insert your name here>" or "I only twirl around like a moron when I'm eating my <insert your food product here>!" And then just kept rerecording himself doing that. You might as well milk it and have fun with it ...

    Anybody know how Daniel Tosh gets around these potential lawsuits when he displays videos on Comedy Central in his show Tosh.0? I mean, I'm sure he gets permission first or it comes from a country with lax copyright laws but what kind of logic do they pitch to the guys that do just outrageously stupid things? "You did something stupid by starting a gasoline can on fire but you have the chance to do something smart and let me show it?"

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by WilyCoder · · Score: 1

      I agree with you about high school. However, I found college to be just as bad. The college I went to had a HUGE frat/sorority presence, and it was like high school all over again, minus the bullying.

      I did my best to focus on the research going on at my college, but as soon as you left the building you saw those frat douchebags with their faux-football jerseys parading around campus with all the absent-minded hot sorority chicks.

    2. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by MadKeithV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was (and am) one of the "punk" group. Long hair, beard, listening to metal, playing guitar in various bands. I was (and am) also a geek/nerd, but I was protected from being picked on by being more obviously in the first group than in the latter group. I tried to step in whenever I saw the "popular kids" picking on what they thought was an easy target, just because it was (according to them) the cool thing to do. I'm still friends with a lot of those other nerds/geeks, and some of the punks. I don't even REMEMBER the "popular kids".

    3. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think he's alone when they say that the worst years of my life were, in fact, high school. Cliques full of assholes and status seeking social climbing butterflies pretty much achieved status by picking on people like me.

      "Do you know who Marcel Proust is? French writer. Total loser. Never had a real job. Unrequited love affairs. Gay. Spent 20 years writing a book almost no one reads. But he's also probably the greatest writer since Shakespeare. Anyway, he uh... he gets down to the end of his life, and he looks back and decides that all those years he suffered, Those were the best years of his life, 'cause they made him who he was. All those years he was happy? You know, total waste. Didn't learn a thing. So, if you sleep until you're 18... Ah, think of the suffering you're gonna miss. I mean high school? High school-those are your prime suffering years. You don't get better suffering than that." -Frank, Little Miss Sunshine

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, I was in a frat and found it quite welcoming (and a valuable social experience). Not all frats are a bunch of super-douchebags or the equivalent of the Betas in Revenge of the Nerds, you know. Actually, it was my experience that most of the anti-frat types were WAY more snobbish and bigoted than most of the fraternities themselves ever were.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Aladrin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      High School was bad for me as well... But now I realize it was because I didn't handle it well, and compared to the rest of life, it wasn't really that bad. If I knew what I know now, I'd have ruled that school.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    6. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I think his was a fair question. "Fair Use" and broadcasting are real gray areas. When I worked briefly in broadcasting, they wouldn't even let us hum a song on the air if we didn't have permission (which cost $). I too am curious how he can get away with play whole videos without permission.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      For myself, Junior High School was by far and away the worst for bullying. By the time I got into High School, most of the idiots and creeps that were picking on me had either moved along to other things, dropped out, or found other targets. There were still some idiots that tried to do stupid stuff, but I eventually got over it.

      My parents also helped here, as they also got the local police involved and had a uniformed police officer talk to some of these creeps that were after me. One of the kids (I think seriously) didn't know that beating the crap out of a kid was illegal and that spending time in jail was a likely outcome from that kind of behavior. The verbal abuse I can generally handle, but some of the physical abuse I got at the hands of some of these idiots is something that I still have scars from decades later. My mother (and now my wife too) says it gives me "character". Yeah, right! A couple of my broken bones never really did heal.

      On the "positive" side, one of the big bullies that went after me also made the mistake of driving a stolen car with a huge stash of "controlled substances"... and spent twenty years (that I know of) in the state prison system. Somehow I found that to be very satisfying when I found out. He stole the car at the age of 18, so essentially threw away his life and didn't even graduate from high school unless he somehow finished in prison.

    8. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by ciderVisor · · Score: 4, Funny

      My mother (and now my wife too)

      Your mother is now your wife? Ewwwwwwwwwww.

      --
      Squirrel!
    9. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      The trick may have been to embrace this as opposed to push it away. That's really whats different about me for college, than high school. I changed my tune being around all new people and started to actually not resent people who did things that were fun.

    10. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      I guess it all depends on the school. I went to a school almost equally divided between nerds and artsy people, and quickly found a fraternity that I liked. We had quite the mix of different types of people - different races, people from money, poor kids, geeks, druggies, rednecks, jocks, and even a few openly gay guys. I made a lot of good friends there, and have no regrets whatsoever. I also agree that there were many anti-fraternity people who were much more snobbish.

    11. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Hey genius: I've got a great idea! If suffering is so great, why not just require everyone to be tortured growing up? That would really add some ~*Piz~Zaz*~ to life, wouldn't it? That would have major formative influence on everyone! Hooray! Now we don't have to go through all the difficulty of having high schools and all, and we can directly maximize the suffering?

      Why not just do that?

      "uhh uhhh"

      Yeah, try to think before posting next time. You, the LMS screenwriters, and anyone who thinks Proust was remotely insightful.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    12. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      Wow, somebody has some sand in his vagina.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    13. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Spent 20 years writing a book almost no one reads. But he's also probably the greatest writer since Shakespeare.

      There must be lots of disagreement about the latter for the former to be true, no?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    14. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      I think you mean your brain. It's your brain that has the sand, leading you to make such bass-ackwards remarks.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    15. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      "On the "positive" side, one of the big bullies that went after me also made the mistake of driving a stolen car with a huge stash of "controlled substances"... and spent twenty years (that I know of) in the state prison system. Somehow I found that to be very satisfying when I found out. He stole the car at the age of 18, so essentially threw away his life and didn't even graduate from high school unless he somehow finished in prison."

      This story would be so much better if you add a part about how you knew he borrowed someone's car, stashed the controlled substance in it, then reported it stolen.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    16. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I'm not the one throwing a hissy fit over a movie quote, Mr. Sand-in-the-Vagina ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    17. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by kefkahax · · Score: 1

      As someone who would've been classified as a "punk" in high school (and 8 years later, I still listen to the same shit, have even more tattoos, yet no piercings), I can agree. I used to have a lot of fun backing up kids that I didn't even know. The jocks, preps, etc.. other bully types (not going to say that punkers don't bully) had no idea that I played hockey, skateboarded and boxed. It was fun times to bully the bully. I even got jumped for dating one of the cheerleaders (I guess she liked the "bad boy" type), she eventually left me, when I wouldn't change for her. I kept laughing and asking "What is this, some kind of bad interpretation of those movies where the popular chick takes an unpopular chick and gives her a make over?"

      Anyway, we'd let anyone hang out with us and be nice to them (until we were familiar with them). Once you're in the "friend zone", expect to be made fun of relentlessly. Don't be afraid to sling verbal feces right back though.

    18. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      When is logical reasoning a hissy-fit? Or were you just posting something to show how stupid the author of the quote is?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    19. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I joined the frat with the reputation for being nerds, Jews, band members, CS majors, gay, nice guys, and a few other stereotypes. There were only forty of us so it was hard to live up to all those at the same time (but we sure tried). And yet, my fraternity at other colleges, one the few occasions I visited them, was often populated with guys that I was rather not fond of, so I'm not trying to defend all fraternities. Some are good, some are bad, on a continuum.

    20. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Good story. I can one-up you. A guy who bullied me in junior high school went to jail because he and his stupid little wanna-be gang MURDERED THEIR LANDLORD AND DRANK HIS BLOOD IN SOME KIND OF RITUAL. Holy shit.

      That's a true story, and I'll even tell you his name: Nick Marsh, from Anchorage, Alaska. He acted hard, but I bet he wept all during his first months in prison.

    21. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by jafac · · Score: 1

      What really pisses me off is when I hear former "popular kids" saying crap like; "oh, those years are horrible for everybody. Everyone felt lonely, and awkward and left out, and picked-on."

      They have absolutely NO fucking clue.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    22. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by bythescruff · · Score: 1

      Four or five close friends in high school?

      Hand in your geek card. Now.

      --
      Chuck Norris: Socialism == a thousand years of darkness.
    23. Re:High School Was the Worst Years for Me as Well by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Physician, heal thyself.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  10. Re:Those who can DO by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I'm sorry to hear that the Star Wars kid decided to be a blood sucking lawyer."

    Yep, they're all evil until YOU need one to help you navigate the law, or until the EFF uses them to fight for your rights.
    Lawyers don't sue, PLAINTIFFS sue.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  11. Re:Boxxy by kidgenius · · Score: 1

    Mother of God no! We DONT need Boxxy at all. Let the the btards have her.

  12. Re:Those who can DO by Surt · · Score: 1

    They're all evil until proven good. The problem with the reputation of lawyers as a class is that the majority of them have proven themselves willing to take frivolous or evil cases and pursue them to the best of their ability. If you stand in the service of evil, expect to be rightly derided and hated.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  13. Bless him by Crookdotter · · Score: 1

    I'm glad he's doing fine. I'm sure 99% of the nerdocracy wish him well. Especially from me since I made a SW kid video.

    Good luck to him, but now we should leave him alone.

  14. Preserving the Cultural Heritage of Trois-Rivi by aapold · · Score: 1

    At this point, being where "Star Wars Kid" happened IS the cultural heritage of Trois-Rivières. I mean I'm sure other important cultural things have happened there, but all of them pale in comparison.

    There should be a monument at the location, along with informative kiosks and a mini-theater playing the video. You should be able to buy replica golf sabers, pose for pictures with cardboard cutouts of Ghyslain, and get to film yourself in the same room...

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  15. Such is how things go by MBGMorden · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Sure, he was a nerdy kid, but the reality is nerdy kids typically make the most money after they get older. After-all, most are relatively intelligent, and most are going to go on to college. The attributes that draw ire from your high school peers are what often translate very well into sucess in a career.

    The high school girls are all swooning over that guy on the football team with a letter jacket. The 20-something girls though are swooning over the guy with the party-boat down at the marina.

    Get laid more as a teenager or more when you're in you're 30's. Kind of a trade-off really.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    1. Re:Such is how things go by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      Sure, he was a nerdy kid, but the reality is nerdy kids typically make the most money after they get older. After-all, most are relatively intelligent, and most are going to go on to college. The attributes that draw ire from your high school peers are what often translate very well into sucess in a career.

      Pfft.. Har Har... Very funny.

      Truth is nerdy kids would have about the same distribution of smart and braindead kids as any other group. Just cause the football club members aren't showing off their math skills to all their friends doesn't mean they're all stupid. And playing Magic or showing off your nerddom doesn't mean you are a misunderstood genius..

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
  16. Just like Steve Bartman.. by HockeyPuck · · Score: 1

    This guy is no different than Steve Bartman who made a mistake as a fan that could have been anybody. He was chastised, ridiculed and pretty much couldn't return to Wrigley Field to watch the Cubs ever again. One ESPN writer did hunt him down a few years later.

    1. Re:Just like Steve Bartman.. by milkmage · · Score: 1

      well not quite. the star wars kid didn't piss off all of Chicago and need police protection. besdies Bartman was an adult..

  17. Reality vs. TV by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's sad is that in the day and age where Napoleon Dynamite is a big selling movie and cool, he's only ironically cool and for anyone who actually does do something in real life that's funny or etc. they get bullied forever and there appear to be no consequences for the bullies.

    --
    stuff |
  18. Venture Bros Episode : The Tag Sale by JoshDM · · Score: 1

    The best was when The Venture Bros. did a take on The Star Wars kid in their episode "Tag Sale" in their first season; pretty much the all-around best episode ever to showcase the show concept, right next to the one with Race Bannon.

    1. Re:Venture Bros Episode : The Tag Sale by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      So did Arrested Development - whenever the Bluths recorded anything on a VCR, it would always be preceded by a leftover fragment of George-Michael doing the Star Wars Kid act.

  19. Re:Those who can DO by Shakrai · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yep, they're all evil until YOU need one to help you navigate the law, or until the EFF uses them to fight for your rights.

    Speaking as someone who got charged with a crime he didn't commit, my lawyer saved my ass.

    There's also NewYorkCountryLawyer to consider. Not all lawyers are evil ambulance chasers you know.....

    --
    I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
    We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  20. The story continues by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    [Paul Harvey] ... and now you know... the rest of the story. [/Paul Harvey]

  21. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who is the forty year old accountant in the picture? Is that what early 20-something men look like these days?

  22. Re:Those who can DO by localman57 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    majority of them have proven themselves willing to take frivolous or evil cases

    Citation???? "Majority" is a very specific word, with a specific meaning, which is not equal to "lots"

    In short, this is utter bullshit. Most lawers never set foot in a courtroom and take "Cases" in the adversarial us vs them sense. They are the people who write contracts, advise clients on how to be compliant with truckloads of government regulations, etc.

  23. Re:Those who can DO by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    "I'm sorry to hear that the Star Wars kid decided to be a blood sucking lawyer."

    Yep, they're all evil until YOU need one to help you navigate the law, or until the EFF uses them to fight for your rights. Lawyers don't sue, PLAINTIFFS sue.

    Except that the reason you need a lawyer to navigate the law is because the law is written by and for lawyers. If it wasn't for evil lawyers, you wouldn't need lawyers to navigate the law or to fight for your rights.
    This is not to say that lawyers are not a necessary part of society. Unfortunately, we have allowed lawyers to write our laws, interpret our laws and determine who is allowed to make money from assisting others in navigating the law.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  24. Re:Those who can DO by paulsnx2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I absolutely agree. You can't whitewash all lawyers as blood suckers just because most of them are. After all, like the joke goes, 99 percent of the lawyers give 1 percent of the lawyers a bad name. But let's look at this a bit more realistically.

    The worst of the worst of the lawyers are the ones WE elect to make the laws and run the legal system that is their life blood. Does anyone really believe that lawyers are primarily concerned with the common good as opposed to what is good for their profession/friends/contributors? Your NEED for lawyers would be dramatically reduced if lawyers were not running things. So why do we keep electing these bozos?

    Lastly, plaintiffs might be the ones that sue, but it is the lawyers by far and large that take home the booty. If they are the primary beneficiaries of a system they as a profession construct, maintain, run, and profit by, then why blame the plaintiffs? The plaintiffs often suffer nearly as much at the hands of the system as the defendants.

  25. Re:Take a good look in the mirror... by Toonol · · Score: 1

    At 14, it was long past the time to grow the fuck up.

    Only children are concerned about such things. When do you plan on growing up?

  26. Bullies by Comboman · · Score: 1
    If you promise to help a bully with his homework, he might protect you from other bullies trying to beat you up. It doesn't mean bullies aren't evil, it just means they are occasionally useful to combat other bullies.

    The worst thing about lawyers is that some eventually become politicians, creating unnecessarily complex laws that require yet more lawyers to navigate (no conflict-of-interest there).

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  27. Re:Those who can DO by nomadic · · Score: 2

    When non-lawyers write the law, they frequently do a lousy job. Laws are written in a very formalized, precise way on purpose.

  28. Re:Those who can DO by Surt · · Score: 1

    Right, they participate in maintaining the overly complex legal system which is a drain on business and productivity for all of our society. We all make our own choices about how we contribute to the world, and we're responsible for those choices.

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  29. Re:Those who can DO by BobMcD · · Score: 1, Insightful

    majority of them have proven themselves willing to take frivolous or evil cases

    Citation???? "Majority" is a very specific word, with a specific meaning, which is not equal to "lots"

        In short, this is utter bullshit. Most lawers never set foot in a courtroom and take "Cases" in the adversarial us vs them sense. They are the people who write contracts, advise clients on how to be compliant with truckloads of government regulations, etc.

    Mis-quote for the flipping win!

    If you stand in the service of evil, expect to be rightly derided and hated.

    Compared to...

    They are the people who write contracts, advise clients on how to be compliant with truckloads of government regulations, etc.

    Newsflash, these types can be COMPLETELY evil as well. Have you READ a contract lately? In fact, I'd challenge you to locate a completely fair contract, toward both parties, in under 24 hours. Go for it, let me know what you find. Further, how many of these attorneys would 'be compliant' in technicality only rather than with the actual intent of the law.

    Evil happens. Attorneys are generally in a group with more examples both in quantity and in bastardly-ness. This is why the good ones stand out as stars burning brightly.

    If this hits close to home, good. Be one of the good guys. Fight the bad guys and convince them all to retire early. Go you!

  30. Jedi = Lawyer = Sith by DarthVain · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Jedi are bound to a code of morality and justice and are trained in the use of the light side of the force but not the Dark side.

    There is no emotion, there is peace.
    There is no ignorance, there is knowledge.
    There is no passion, there is serenity.
    There is no death, there is the Force.

            Jedi are the guardians of peace in the galaxy.
            Jedi use their powers to defend and to protect.
            Jedi respect all life, in any form.
            Jedi serve others rather than ruling over them, for the good of the galaxy.
            Jedi seek to improve themselves through knowledge and training.

    If all of that doesn't describe a Lawyer I am not sure what does. Try to keep in mind people that not all (in fact only a very small but highly visible) lawyers are ambulance chasing souless bastards, or greedy corporate shills. Most try to uphold the law as best they can and protect people. I have a bias in that my Dads a lawyer I suppose. However just like Jedi, there are both the dark and the light side of the force. I suppose some lawyers are very Sith like to be sure.

    1. Re:Jedi = Lawyer = Sith by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Most try to uphold the law as best they can and protect people.

      Is upholding the law the same as protecting people?

    2. Re:Jedi = Lawyer = Sith by ezratrumpet · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying....is that he really IS a Jedi?

    3. Re:Jedi = Lawyer = Sith by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      If you really want to get philosophical one might argue that the purpose of law itself is to protect people.

      I would seriously argue that law itself is usually pretty pure, but sometimes get corrupted by politics to achieve some end.

      Given that many Lawyers go into Politics, you might say Lawyers are Jedi, while Politicians are the Sith. Corporations I guess would be the Trade Federations... working with the Sith to change the laws...

      Sounds like a certain movie, too bad it sucked. Probably because Jar Jar doesn't fit in anywhere.

      Hey its an imperfect world!

  31. Re:Those who can DO by modecx · · Score: 1

    they're all evil until YOU need one to help you navigate the law

    Of course--after all, their kind created the sort of law which needs the assistance of a lawyer, in order to avoid becoming a criminal--even for the most mundane of transgressions. If you ask me, *that* is where the evil lies. It's basically the case of the fox guarding the hen house.

    "The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws." - Ayn Rand

    Unfortunately Mrs. Rand left out the part where the lawyers get to extort these myriad victims of the law. The law as it stands today is little more than a professionalized protection racket. The only thing the lawyers have over the mobsters is they're in a position to make it legal.

    --
    Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  32. Re:Those who can DO by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Most of us are brain-whores for some company or other but only lawyers specialize in S&M.

  33. Re:Those who can DO by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    "I'm sorry to hear that the Star Wars kid decided to be a blood sucking lawyer."
    Yep, they're all evil until YOU need one to help you navigate the law, or until the EFF uses them to fight for your rights.
    Lawyers don't sue, PLAINTIFFS sue.

    And if I've got a project running behind schedule I won't say "no" to a Sith Lord offering to find new ways to motivate my men. I wouldn't want to have a beer with him, though.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  34. Re:Those who can DO by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Informative

    So why do we keep electing these bozos?

    Douglas Adams explains it much better than I ever could.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  35. Re:Take a good look in the mirror... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Says who? I'm in my 40s and I still love to do that crap. Hell, last Christmas my daughter and I had a "sword" fight with card board tubes from wrapping paper. So, no he didn't need to grow up. He was fine. It was wankers like you, who hate their own crappy lives, who tried to ruin his. You just can't stand it when someone has some fun, can you loser?

  36. Re:Those who can DO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Oh please stop apologizing for lawyers. The only reason you ever need one is because someone else has one. If you get yourself into the position where you feel like you need to sue someone I suggest taking some personal responsibility. If you get sued, you're paying protection money because someone else can't accept personal responsibility. Lawyers create nothing.

  37. Star Wars Kid - the Drunken Jedi by NetFusion · · Score: 1

    I thought his acting was quite good once the special effects were added.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3GJOVPjhXMY

  38. Re:Those who can DO by steelfood · · Score: 1

    Unless they're patent or copyright trolls whose business model revolves around suing major corporations or filesharers respectively in hopes of getting a decent settlement out of the lawsuit most of the time, in which case, yeah, lawyers do sue.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  39. I can't wait to see him use the Chewbacca Defense! by mamono · · Score: 1

    Finally, someone worthy of carrying on the torch of totally confusing the jury!

  40. Re:Those who can DO by AshtangiMan · · Score: 1

    That's true too. And gun shops are not responsible for criminals robbing people at gun point.

  41. Re:Those who can DO by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So lawyers can make more money. QED

    --
    -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  42. Re:So why did he post the video? by Bitch-Face+Jones · · Score: 1

    He didn't post it, his "friend" who recorded it did.

  43. Re:I can't wait to see him use the Chewbacca Defen by fishexe · · Score: 1

    Nah, man, he'll go straight to busting out the lightsaber moves in the courtroom.

    --
    "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  44. Re:Those who can DO by gknoy · · Score: 1

    Oh please stop apologizing for lawyers. The only reason you ever need one is because someone else has one. If you get yourself into the position where you feel like you need to sue someone I suggest taking some personal responsibility. If you get sued, you're paying protection money because someone else can't accept personal responsibility. Lawyers create nothing.

    They may not create much, but they provide a professional service. Your plumber or air conditioning repair main doesn't create much, either. Everything they do, you could do too -- it's just that it will take you a long time to get the expertise to do it as well as they do.

    You can do the same thing Lawyers do ... they're just trained to do it better. They're not inherently evil or selfish. When you need one, you're glad to find a skilled one. The laws are a bramble created by people (and some lawyers), and in order to navigate them well it is wise to have a guide. Think of a lawyer as a sherpa who guides you and saves your ass when you are forced to travel in a hostile landscape.

  45. Needs a snappier headline by Purity+Of+Essence · · Score: 2, Funny

    Loser Lawyer Litigates, Laughs Last!

    Bulky Barrister Born By Bullies!

    Saber-Swinging Super-Star Supervises Saving Society!

    Crazy Counsel Courts Conservationists!

    Activist Attorney Accepts Arguable Acclaim!

    Famed Flabby Fanboy Fixes Fate, Flaunts Fellowship!

    --
    +0 Meh
  46. Bitterness will kill you by theolein · · Score: 1

    Hopefully sooner than later. bye.

  47. Re:Those who can DO by nomadic · · Score: 1

    You think the Congressional staffer drafting a law cares about how much some other lawyer down the street in a large law firm will make interpreting that law? Stop thinking there's a conspiracy.

  48. Re:Those who can DO by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    Of course--after all, their kind created the sort of law which needs the assistance of a lawyer, in order to avoid becoming a criminal--even for the most mundane of transgressions. If you ask me, *that* is where the evil lies. It's basically the case of the fox guarding the hen house.

    Ahhh, if only there were some method for the hens to decide who would be the most appropriate to guard the hen house. Oh wait, I have an idea, they could choose one themselves? Of course that would mean the hens would have to turn their brains on for a couple of seconds...

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  49. Yeah, so lets write bunch of stupid articles by Technomancer · · Score: 1

    to make him semi famous again. Maybe somebody will start making fun of him again.

  50. Okay, he's going to be a lawyer? by Chas · · Score: 1

    Ultimate proof he's turned to the dark side.

    =)

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  51. Re:Those who can DO by Surt · · Score: 1

    Nah, evil always finds its way to the top. The bottom must be unwilling to comply. It's a case of do you blame Hitler, or blame millions of Germans who followed his direction. In reality, both are to blame, but the followers who carry out the actual acts of evil bear more responsibility (how many Jews did Hitler personally kill?)

    --
    "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
  52. Re:Take a good look in the mirror... by JonJ · · Score: 1

    Man, I wish I could mod you up. I hope I never forget how to have fun like that.

    --
    -- Linux user #369862
  53. Re:Those who can DO by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    When non-lawyers write the law, they frequently do a lousy job. Laws are written in a very formalized, precise way on purpose.

    Yes, so that the average person doesn't understand what the legislature actually passed (reducing the odds that they will vote the bums out of office). It has gotten so bad that one of the reasons laws are written the way they are is so that the legislators won't truly understand what they are voting for.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  54. and that helped how? by shiftless · · Score: 1

    However, his video was seen 1 billion times and multiple thousands of geeks came immediately to his defense

    Were they sporting fantasy armor and elaborate fake swords, or did they merely stand defiantly with arms crossed in what was supposed to be perceived as a menacing manner, armed with nothing but a shallow perspective and a narrow sense of humor?

  55. Re:Those who can DO by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Can you point to an example?

  56. Re:Wow, how sad is it that for Joachim Phoenix by alcmaeon · · Score: 1

    I thought that was a picture of Joachim Phoenix and that maybe he had gotten released from hip hop rehab.

  57. Re:Those who can DO by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

    How about the "Healthcare Reform Bill"?
    Nancy Pelosi, "...we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it..." I can't find the reference to the Senator or Congressman who said he would need two lawyers in order to understand the bills he voted for, but one of them said it when asked to promise to read every bill before voting on it.

    --
    The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  58. I'll bet you anything... by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

    he has now mastered the Chewbacca Defense

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  59. Re:Those who can DO by nomadic · · Score: 1

    What provision do you find complicated enough to require an attorney's help?

  60. Re:Those who can DO by alexo · · Score: 1

    > Yep, they're all evil until YOU need one to help you navigate the law

    They perpetuate a system in which justice costs $250/hour.