Slashdot Mirror


Mom Arrested After Son Makes Dry Ice "Bombs"

formfeed writes "Police were called to a house in Omaha where a 14-year-old made some 'dry ice bombs' (dry ice in soda bottles). Since his mom knew about it, she is now facing felony charges for child endangment and possession of a destructive device. From the article: 'Assistant Douglas County Attorney Eric Wells said the boy admitted to making the bomb and that his mother knew he was doing so. The boy was set to appear Tuesday afternoon in juvenile court, accused of possessing a destructive device.'" She's lucky they didn't find the baking soda volcano in the basement.

571 comments

  1. Sounds familiar. by Leebert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This lets me tell one of my favorite stories (which probably isn't all that funny.)

    I have a friend who is a physicist. He was hanging around with his brother, who worked at a bookstore. They were doing essentially the same thing, but with liquid nitrogen, behind the store. After one particularly loud bottle explosion, they went back into the store, only to hear a loud pounding on the door shortly thereafter.

    Opening the door, they were faced with a Baltimore County police officer, who demanded an explanation. My friend started to explain: "Oh, it's OK Officer, I'm a physicist..." As if that explained everything. Which, to be honest, probably does.

    I make that joke more often than you could imagine at the physicists at work.

    But in all seriousness, this continues what I've been calling the "war on curiosity". Recently, I accidentally picked a flight that had a stopover (that's what I get for clicking through the website too fast.) So while I was bored and waiting on the plane, I wandered up next to the front row of seats and peered into the cockpit. I was there for a minute or so, until the flight attendant came up in a fairly huffy attitude, and told me that I couldn't congregate in the front of the plane. Which was on the ground. With the engine shut off. With the wheels chocked. And the pilot sitting in his seat.

    I'm afraid anymore to walk to the end of the platform and look down the subway tunnels. I'm afraid to take pictures of bridges. I'm afraid to be just plain curious, because it's apparently abnormal and suspicous. It's getting ridiculous. And it's going to come back and bite us in the butt.

    1. Re:Sounds familiar. by Spad · · Score: 4, Funny

      I didn't know you could congregate on your own...

    2. Re:Sounds familiar. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm afraid anymore to walk to the end of the platform and look down the subway tunnels. I'm afraid to take pictures of bridges. I'm afraid to be just plain curious, because it's apparently abnormal and suspicous. It's getting ridiculous. And it's going to come back and bite us in the butt.

      You say this as if it is an unintended, rather than intended, consequence of how our society is organized.

    3. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think having citizens who aren't curious will be bad?

      Our industries, or what's left of them, will be much less competitive in the future. Even our politicians will be less creative in solving problems.

    4. Re:Sounds familiar. by Skater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm afraid anymore to walk to the end of the platform and look down the subway tunnels. I'm afraid to take pictures of bridges. I'm afraid to be just plain curious, because it's apparently abnormal and suspicous. It's getting ridiculous. And it's going to come back and bite us in the butt.

      As a railfan, I hesitate to take pictures of trains outside museums for similar reasons. Plenty have been accosted or detained for doing nothing more than taking pictures of trains from passenger platforms and similar places, and Amtrak put out a policy recently that makes little sense. Last summer I took a picture of a train that I'd just ridden for two hours (not Amtrak), and I actually felt nervous about it for a moment afterward. I've taken some pictures inside DC's Metro stations from time to time without a problem, but the thought of having the police show up crosses my mind every time I do it.

      Of course the solution is to take more pictures of trains so that feeling goes away. But that just increases the odds I'll get some attention from the police over it.

    5. Re:Sounds familiar. by whitedsepdivine · · Score: 1

      It not just being curious enough to make the bombs, it is also being smart enough not to get caught.

    6. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Its going to bite even the overlords in the ass too. An ebbing tide lowers all boats.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:Sounds familiar. by MrNaz · · Score: 1

      That would not be a problem if their goal is greater *relative* wealth and not greater *absolute* wealth.
      It would also not be a problem if the lowering of all boats is an intended consequence of a foreign power with significant domestic political influence.

      --
      I hate printers.
    8. Re:Sounds familiar. by someone1234 · · Score: 1

      Most likely you are on a list already.

      --
      Patents Drive Free Software as Hurricanes Drive Construction Industry
    9. Re:Sounds familiar. by xaxa · · Score: 5, Funny

      "An Englishman, even if he is alone, forms an orderly queue of one." — George Mikes.

      I reckon an Ankh-Morporkian can congregate alone, but my national stereotypes aren't up to picking a real nationality for it.

    10. Re:Sounds familiar. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Today's overlords don't really have much choice. The machine was built in the beginning of the 20th century and there's probably no way to shut it down until events run their course.

    11. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A couple of years back, I was flying for the first time to Detroit. Over there, I would meet a friend who flew in from another airport and who would be there for the first time as well.

      To be able to agree on a place to meet, I wanted a floor plan of the airport. It took me about a week before I actually googled for "detroit airport floor plan", because doing so gave me the uneasy feeling that some DHS/TSA person could consider this as preparation for terrorist activity and that it could get me picked up/out.

    12. Re:Sounds familiar. by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The war against American intellect is not affected by any outside foreign power as far as I can tell, unless of course you count the Vatican and they are at best a minor player. No, it waged internally be people who's power base relies on people not asking questions and just doing as they are told. It is domestic conservative and religious organizations that are poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people.

    13. Re:Sounds familiar. by nopainogain · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm gonna teeter between devils advocate and sound rationalist. We live in weird times my friend. There are people out there who arent just trying to see how high mentos shoot the cola. I speculate that even recreational fireworks will be much more legislated in the near term. Sadly, shows like mythbusters that entertain and amuse with fun examples of destructive forces are becoming ground for research material. I love watching them blow crap up in safe testing ground but someone somewhere is taking detailed notes of blast radii.

    14. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, this type of slapdown on curiosity, creativity, and exploration makes me want to cry. It reminds me of the fall of the galactic empire in Asimov's Foundation series - a degredation of the desire to learn new things... People don't want children to dream and invent, they want them to memorize, regurgitate, and keep the status quo.
       
      An example of the insanity: I love model rocketry. I can build small rockets with no one looking at me sideways (but when I move up to the C or D engines, and buy in large quantity, I start to get odd looks), but I don't want to build small rockets. I want to build large rockets, with radio controlled fins, a wireless video feed, and much stronger engines (either solid state or even move into simple liquid fuels). Now if I were interested in this say 50 years back, this would be odd, but not unheard of, and certainly not slapped down by local law enforcement. In today's age, if I started messing with liquid fuels, or built rockets over 6 feet tall, I would likely get harassed by local law enforcement (or more likely my neighbors would call for them), assuming I could even get the proper permits to be allowed to build the thing... permits to build something with my own two hands and then test it out on my friend's private property (a farm)? CRAZY, and wrong.
       
      I hope we get out of this funk and get some new chemistry and engineering excitement back into our children. Sigh.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    15. Re:Sounds familiar. by Leebert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Plenty have been accosted or detained for doing nothing more than taking pictures of trains from passenger platforms and similar places

      I feel your pain... I'm an aviation geek, and I'm waiting for the day I get shot for standing on the top floor of the BWI parking garage with my scanner listening to ATC while watching departures from RWY 15-R.

    16. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think they care? If the ebbing tide only impacts their children or grandchildren they're only going to care a little...maybe. If it impacts generations down the line- they're not going to care one whit because it doesn't affect them.

    17. Re:Sounds familiar. by Svartalf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And if you believe it is solely that, you'd be mistaken. The domestic liberal organizations have as much to blame on that front as the others.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    18. Re:Sounds familiar. by JWW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This isn't just a one sided political happening. While I will agree that some conservative thought demands that people "don't ask questions," we also face liberal thought that severely punishes "asking the wrong questions."

    19. Re:Sounds familiar. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Wouldn’t it make more sense to just Google the airport’s official website? It has a maps & directions section with layout plans of the terminals... took me about 5 seconds to find it in the left-hand menu.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:Sounds familiar. by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      In Baltimore, a series of loud bangs is indeed probable cause (and for good reason too), given that it has an "actual" crime problem. Good on the officer for investigating.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    21. Re:Sounds familiar. by xaxa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just take the photo and don't worry about it. Even if you're stopped, offering to delete the photograph should presumably satisfy most security/police, and while it's not solving the problem you'll at least have photographs for the 99.9% of times you're not stopped.

    22. Re:Sounds familiar. by Svartalf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lest one think of me as doing a projection of things...

      "The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming, where everyone would be interdependent."
      -John Dewey

      “Ninety-nine [students] out of a hundred are automata, careful to walk in prescribed paths, careful to follow the prescribed customs. This is not an accident but the result of substantial education, which scientifically defined, is the subsumption of the individual.”
      -William Torrey Harris, U.S. Commissioner of Education from 1889-1906.

      "Our schools have been scientifically designed to prevent over-education from happening. The average American [should be] content with their humble role in life, because they're not tempted to think about any other role."
      -William Torrey Harris, U.S. Commissioner of Education from 1889-1906.

      “Individual talent is too sporadic and unpredictable to be allowed any important part in the organization society. Social systems which endure are built on the average person who can be trained to occupy any position adequately if not brilliantly.”
      -Stuart Chase, The Proper Study of Mankind, 1948.

      "A primary purpose of the educational system is to train school children in good citizenship, patriotism and loyalty to the state and the nation as a means of protecting the public welfare."
      -Justice H. Walter Croskey, 2008.

      Both sides are very guilty of fostering their agendas and neither side of that crowd is going to be at all helpful towards the American Intellect; and it's been ongoing for a long, long time if you look at the comments from Harris and Dewey.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    23. Re:Sounds familiar. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To a large degree the war was started by (mostly) well meaning people at the end of the 19th century who had just lived through the Industrial Revolution and concluded that interchangeable, standardized humans would revolutionize society (for the better) in the same way that interchangeable, standardized components revolutionized manufacturing. Back then the 20th century's two biggest examples of progressivism, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union had not yet seen the light of day. This is back when most people believed in a neat, orderly universe created by the watchmaker god. All living things could by precisely classified into a uniform hierarchy. Their view of the universe did not allow for chaos, quantum physics and ring species. As it turns out, they were wrong but the less-well meaning elements certainly aren't going to let go of the power without a fight (or a collapse).

    24. Re:Sounds familiar. by TheLink · · Score: 1

      It could depend on how often you shower.

      --
    25. Re:Sounds familiar. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Well if it is a war on curiosity, pick your side, mate. Resist ! Once they'll discover that 99% of the people caught by anti-terrorist laws were genuinely curious persons, they may think about stopping the madness.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    26. Re:Sounds familiar. by Leebert · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In Baltimore, a series of loud bangs is indeed probable cause (and for good reason too), given that it has an "actual" crime problem.

      Baltimore City != Baltimore County. One of the rare large cities in the US that is outside of the jurisdiction of a county. (St. Louis being the other, IIRC.)

      Honestly, I'm not complaining about what the Baltimore County cop did. It's reasonable to investigate. And as long as everyone has a round of laughter at the end and the officer goes away wishing everyone a good day, it's cool.

      But, sadly, that isn't the case for a lot of law enforcement these days. (Hence the /. story.)

    27. Re:Sounds familiar. by toupsz · · Score: 1

      I was recently reading some of Hutchin's work on distributed cognition (including "How a Cockpit Remembers its Speeds"), and was a little curious about more modern aircraft cockpits (since the socio-technical system he was describing was probably considerably more technical now). I had the same concern about lingering near the cockpit on my last flight, but I just asked the attendant if I could speak to the pilot, and was politely allowed to do so...

      Probably just depends on whether or not the person is either (a.) overly concerned and diligent (and unable to make an assessment of what is reasonable) or (b.) has a far overdeveloped sense of authority and needs to boss someone around.

      Of course, when I was a kid, you almost always got to see the cockpit... :-/

    28. Re:Sounds familiar. by Bayoudegradeable · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A buddy of mine and I were doing the same dry ice thing a few years back. Just good old curiosity. What the heck is gonna happen if we drop dry ice, water and seal up the two liter? Honestly, it's a MUCH bigger bang than I would have thought. The top and fragments were sent all over the driveway. So after the third ones the neighbors called, and we realized it was time to stop : ) I do remember thinking that something like this, packed with the wrong stuff inside could cause some trouble. I guess, in a strict sense, it is a bomb after all. Side note... taking pictures of oil refineries, oil pipelines in south Louisiana (pre-spill, mind you, post 9/11) will get you harassed quickly by local law enforcement. I remember telling one officer, "You know, this used to be a free country." Instead of getting irate he began the "hey look, just doing my job" routine. He then went on to talk about all the press restrictions and lock-down procedures they have if an accident or attack were ever to happen at an oil processing facility. It's sad how much money, effort and energy is wasted on keeping us "safe" from terror.... I mean think about it; what did OBL and company spend in bringing down the twin towers? What have we spent since? What have we "gained" in the war of terror? In terms of dollars to outcome; we have lost. Terribly.

      --
      Sig Registration Form 34c_766(a) submitted to Ministry of Signature Management. Approval pending.
    29. Re:Sounds familiar. by adonoman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      wierd times

      WTF? It's weird only in that everyone is freaked out all the time. The risk of anything is way lower these days - there's a reason our life expectancy is cracking 80, and it's not just medical advances. It's not like crazies are a new thing - people have been trying to blow things up since gunpowder was invented. They just didn't have 24-hour news to whip us all up into a panic. Things you really should be worried about - driving accidents, falling, accidental poisoning, work related injuries, getting hit by a car, drowning, seasonal flu, fatal hernia, accidental gunshot, electrocution, law enforcement shooting you. All of which are more common preventable causes of death in the last 20 years than dying from a terrorist explosion (including the 9/11 deaths).

    30. Re:Sounds familiar. by stanlyb · · Score: 1

      It already does bite. To the bone. Why do you think there are so many foreigner engineers? Or physicist, or pick any other math-logic oriented profession. The university system is ridiculous, too costly, and with questionable results. There are only 2-3 big and good well known universities, and they are simply not enough. And one of them is MIT.

    31. Re:Sounds familiar. by Nadaka · · Score: 0

      I was pointing out what I believe to be the biggest sources. I am not going to disagree wit you, it isn't a one sided problem.

      Most of the so called liberal organizations in this country really don't fit the correct definition of the word "liberal".

    32. Re:Sounds familiar. by interiot · · Score: 5, Informative

      And if the cops ask you to delete photos, play along, because recovering the deleted photographs is trivial compared to what can happen when arguing with a cop.

      After the cop leaves, swap out the memory card for another. Make sure you set the card aside and don't take any more pictures on it, because taking new pictures could potentially overwrite some of the deleted data. When you get home, download and run PhotoRec (it's GPL/open source, available on multiple platforms, and runs almost without regard to what the underlying filesystem is).

    33. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "war on curiosity".
      I like that, it's spot-on.

    34. Re:Sounds familiar. by b0bby · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Don't delete any photos. Get a copy of The Photographer's Right from http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm, and stick it in your camera bag if you're worried. Just because some rentacop has an attitude doesn't mean you need to change your behavior.

    35. Re:Sounds familiar. by Hylandr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree.

      The levels of paranoia are getting truly absurd. There was Terrorism in the 70's, the 80's, and the 90's but here comes the new millennia and everyone just turns their brains off and those that don't get punished for it.

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    36. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Having lived in both i can say this: Baltimore County cops will harass and intimidate at the drop of a hat. it doesn't take a big loud boom to get their attention. In Baltimore City, I heard gun shots outside my window at least 3-4 nights a week; but never any sirens.

    37. Re:Sounds familiar. by nopainogain · · Score: 2, Funny

      remember the guy on The Muppet Show who always was trying to blow things up? I bet if they tried to re-release that show today, they'd censor him out of it.

    38. Re:Sounds familiar. by digitig · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well if it is a war on curiosity, pick your side, mate. Resist ! Once they'll discover that 99% of the people caught by anti-terrorist laws were genuinely curious persons, they may think about stopping the madness.

      Assuming, of course, that it matters to them who they catch, and they're not simply interested in keeping the fear levels high.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    39. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The children who know how to think for themselves spoil the harmony of the collective society which is coming, where everyone would be interdependent."
      -John Dewey

      A quote deliberately removed from context and sensationalized by Ann Coulter, of all people.

      Dewey also said this about education: "To prepare him for the future life means to give him command of himself; it means so to train him that he will have the full and ready use of all his capacities; that his eye and ear and hand may be tools ready to command, that his judgment may be capable of grasping the conditions under which it has to work, and the executive forces be trained to act economically and efficiently. It is impossible to reach this sort of adjustment save as constant regard is had to the individual's own powers, tastes, and interests."

      Hardly reconcilable with Coulter's intended misinterpretation of that first quote now, isn't it?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    40. Re:Sounds familiar. by Altus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      competitive with who exactly? Anyone who thinks this problem is limited to America is fooling themselves.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    41. Re:Sounds familiar. by TomRC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Excellent idea. Let's start a movement to rename it the "United States of Ankh-Morpork". Maybe that would wake a few people up...

      "I'm to be an Ankhmorporkian, where at least I'm told I'm free..."

    42. Re:Sounds familiar. by Skater · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If I'm on a list for occasionally taking pics of trains, then I'm on plenty of other lists, too... Oh well. It's not the lists that bothers me. It's the risk of getting arrested or something.

      Like someone else said most likely it wouldn't get that far - I'm a reasonable person. My point was more about the culture that has been created.

    43. Re:Sounds familiar. by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not if Dewey was being sarcastic in the first quote. You assume that Dewey approved of the “collective society” he predicted in which free thinking was a liability.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    44. Re:Sounds familiar. by men0s · · Score: 1

      As a person that benches, I've taken thousands pictures of trains and infrastructure outside of museums. I do this simply because, broadly put, as long as I'm on public property, I'm fine. Hell, out of the seven years I've been taking flicks, I've only been approached once and it wasn't by any sort of authority figure: just a local rail yard worker telling me I'm not allowed to take pictures. I simply said that I am allowed to take pictures (I was standing in a park and ride lot for the local bus system) but turned and left because there weren't any more freights on their way in or out.

      But that's just my anecdote. For those that ride and want to photograph rail systems (Metro, Metra, Amtrak, et al.) well, as asinine as their policies are, you have to follow them as long as you're on their property. I used to ride Detroit's People Mover every day and would see signs in the stations stating that if there is going to be any sort of photography to contact DPM's public relations department.

    45. Re:Sounds familiar. by Hylandr · · Score: 1

      Of course the solution is to take more pictures of trains so that feeling goes away. But that just increases the odds I'll get some attention from the police over it.

      Everyone needs to do just this. Not just for rail but every stinking thing until people get used to it again.

      It stuck in my head that we need to have hundreds of airliners orbit New York at low altitude the first time everyone ran from Air Force One like frightened mindless children. I was ashamed to be an American that day. Truly shamed and embarrassed.

      - Dan.

      --
      ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
    46. Re:Sounds familiar. by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, the Amtrack Private Police Force reacts very violently to photography. The CEO tried to say it was a mistake, and that photography is allowed. The Commander in Chief of their private forces, however, cut him and told everybody he is wrong, it's a crime to photograph Amtrack property and you WILL go to Amtrack's prison. (And yes, Amtrack has it's own private police force, and yes they are deputized, and yes the corporation can enact it's own laws for it's forces to enforce).

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    47. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No good can come from your surveillance of this airport, very suspicious - you could be a terrorist! Consider yourself reported.

    48. Re:Sounds familiar. by God'sDuck · · Score: 1

      And you'll have the one you deleted, too. I rue the day securidrones find out that recovery software can undelete photos in two mouse clicks.

    49. Re:Sounds familiar. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      That is what your neighbor's unsecured Wi-Fi is for. That is also the same reason my Wi-Fi uses encryption.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    50. Re:Sounds familiar. by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      Gentlemen, congratulations. You're everything we've come to expect from years of government training. -- Zed

    51. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The war against American intellect is not affected by any outside foreign power

      In point of fact this video led me to youtube which led me to watching videos of guys pissing on electric fences for half an hour.

    52. Re:Sounds familiar. by ndavis · · Score: 1

      The only time I have would ever have been afraid to take a picture was when my Dad worked at the Pentagon and he took me in for a tour. I was searched before entering and they guard stationed at the door looked through my camera bag (he even found a hidden pocket I didn't know about) then said "I'll let you take your camera in but if it leaves the bag we will have to confiscate it."

      Now I didn't remove the camera from my bag as I could see they had cameras nearly everywhere we walked.

    53. Re:Sounds familiar. by AdamBv1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, if i think of the things i used to do as a teen i know i would never get away with it nowadays. I didn't used to have access to dry ice so i used to take 2 liter bottles and put old bike tire valve stems in them then pressurize them to about 100 PSI (our poor pump wouldn't go over that) and them split them with an axe, even my parents used to think it was one of the coolest things ever as it has such an amazing report. Used to do this at random times in the summer and LOTS by the 4th of July and never once had anybody complain. Then there were the spud guns i used to make and bolas and Atlatls and all kinds of stuff with my free time after school. I even had a chance to take the spud gun to school for physics class and everyone had a grand time, just a couple years later after columbine i would of been interrogated and forced into counseling if anyone on the school staff found i had such things at home.

    54. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it won't. I won't bite the overlords in the ass one bit. They die off before the effects of their ass-clowning truly takes effect, to be replaced by other ass-clowns that import the goods, services, and expertise that we can no longer grow here at home.

      The death of a nation does not happen over-night but in the span of its life.

    55. Re:Sounds familiar. by harrkev · · Score: 1
      --
      "-1 Troll" is the apparently the same as "-1 I disagree with you."
    56. Re:Sounds familiar. by kc8apf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People who will try to cause fear and injury aren't new. There hasn't been any proof that all this legislation and fear mongering around curiosity has actually made us any safer. We live in an inherently dangerous world. It's time to realize that we can't baby-proof it. Then we can get back to doing research, having odd hobbies, and being generally curious without fear of being accosted.

      --
      kc8apf
    57. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This explains now why -- as I was taking pictures of the Amtrak's train undercarriage in the sunset on a train I was riding (it was halted in a train station) -- I was asked (by personnel) what/why I was taking pictures. I thought this person had a genuine interest in why someone would take a picture of something so common. But the more likely explanation was that he suspected something more dangerous.

    58. Re:Sounds familiar. by silicone_chemist · · Score: 1

      So, every person who buys a ticket to ride the train should snap a few random pictures with their cell phone. Then rinse and repeat each day. Eventually, the cops would become conditioned to this and view it as normal. Much the way their gradual assault on our rights and freedoms is becoming normal to us.

    59. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      soon, only the terrorists will have bombs

      stay in practice.

      jr

    60. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jerf · · Score: 5, Informative

      I hate to say this, but: this. It isn't conservatives, it isn't liberals, it isn't even anything that would be today recognized as "progressive", because all political philosophies have shifted so far in the past hundred+ years as to be unrecognizable.

      What it is is a hundred-year-old meme program still running in an environment that falsifies every underlying assumption the program is built on, and until we flush it out of our system, we're not going to have any radically different results.

      I strongly recommend The Underground History of American Education. You do not have to agree with the author's prescription to understand and agree with the diagnosis, which I find well-researched.

    61. Re:Sounds familiar. by Altus · · Score: 1

      Actually its not weird that everyone is freaked out all the time. Everyone thinks they live in weird times. Everyone thinks that kids these days are bad and dumb and don't respect their elders. And that modern music is so much worse than what we listened to when I was a kid.

      People think this, people have always thought this. Nothing much really changes.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    62. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, thats not entirely fair. there is a long tradition of left wing and/or progressive radical teaching which celebrates the individual. montessori, waldorf, herbert kohl, etc. its the democratically labelled corporatists and game players who advocate this on the left, along with the state capitalists of the soviet union and china.

    63. Re:Sounds familiar. by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Where is the "+1 Freaking scary" mod?

    64. Re:Sounds familiar. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You missed the point of the quote. The ebbing tide even impacts Pharoah. The base of the pyramid needs to be large in order to reach as far into the sky as it does. Undermine that base and your pyramid will crumble.

      Even ponzi probably realized this.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    65. Re:Sounds familiar. by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I didn't know you could congregate on your own...

      Three's a crowd: me, myself, and I

    66. Re:Sounds familiar. by mlush · · Score: 1

      Don't delete any photos. Get a copy of The Photographer's Right from http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm, and stick it in your camera bag if you're worried. Just because some rentacop has an attitude doesn't mean you need to change your behavior.

      This is a good strategy, but it rather assumes that said rentacop can a) read b) will act on an unsubstantiated legal opinion got off the web over his training/orders and c) will tolerate any challenge to his authority

    67. Re:Sounds familiar. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      I guess as soon as the flight attendant showed up it counted as a group? Hope she yelled at herself too.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    68. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...is trivial compared to what can happen when arguing with a cop.

      Absolutely not. We have a right to honest freedom of expression. Causing scenes over such police-state style behavior brings oppression into public view; this is what our justice system is for.

      When we blindly comply with oppression the police-state has effectively done its job.

    69. Re:Sounds familiar. by JTsyo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's not crazy at all. What would be the range of a 6ft rocket? What kind of damage can it do with fuel still in it?

    70. Re:Sounds familiar. by bdenton42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even Mythbusters is censoring themselves. They were mixing up some kind of explosive the other day and Adam said "We're going to make *bleep* by mixing *bleep* with *bleep*". It's sad really.

    71. Re:Sounds familiar. by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Well, they did just catch a bunch of Russian spies...

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    72. Re:Sounds familiar. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Don't delete any photos. Get a copy of The Photographer's Right from http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm [krages.com], and stick it in your camera bag if you're worried. Just because some rentacop has an attitude doesn't mean you need to change your behavior.

      Good advice. Also, get a bottle of K-Y jelly, and stick it right beside The Photographer's Rights. It might be a good idea to pre-lube your anus prior to starting the argument, in case they decide not to let you keep the bottle after your arrest.

    73. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow! That quote from Croskey is scary! I thought education was to improve knowledge, life/social/expression skills and health. What's the next step? Bring on the storm troopers?

    74. Re:Sounds familiar. by tokul · · Score: 1

      f I started messing with liquid fuels, or built rockets over 6 feet tall, I would likely get harassed by local law enforcement (or more likely my neighbors would call for them), assuming I could even get the proper permits to be allowed to build the thing... permits to build something with my own two hands and then test it out on my friend's private property (a farm)? CRAZY, and wrong.

      People are afraid that your 1.8 meter wonder might explode in their backyard and not in yours. People are not that stupid and careless as they were 50 years ago. Although I think "do whatever you want" time was 60 or more years ago. Before a-bomb, cold war and wunderwaffe

    75. Re:Sounds familiar. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is domestic conservative and religious organizations that are poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people.

      It is neither, and all. It is people who just want what is best for you.

      It is people who feel that you must behave in the manner that most benefits you (and more importantly society). It is people that believe that it is ok to tell you what to do, as long as they are doing it with a positive intent.

      It is people who are too afraid to let anyone fail.

      And it is working because it's a hell of a lot easier to win support when you are doing 'good' than it is when you are the person who advocates for personal freedom.

      For a good example of this, look at the lack of a response when one of our future Supreme Court justices didn't have a problem when asked, "Could I write a law that tells you what you have to eat?"

      Such a question should have been laughed out of the room, not because it was a silly question (and a gotcha with regard to a future question on Health Care), but because such a thing as the government being authorized to mandate to such a personal level as to what you must eat is laughably authoritarian.

      But, terrifingly, such a concept didn't even make it out of the internet muckraking circles. And that's why we have this problem, because people think the ends justify the means.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    76. Re:Sounds familiar. by vxice · · Score: 1

      maybe they were just curious what you were doing?

      --
      every anarchist is a baffled dictator. Benito_Mussolini
    77. Re:Sounds familiar. by Logarhythmic · · Score: 1

      Anyone who has so much as glanced at a Terminal chart knows this information. Hell, anyone who's played MS Flight Simulator knows this information. A "scanner" in this context most likely means a handheld transceiver, which is perfectly legal to own for monitoring any public transmission (and yes, ATC transmissions are public and unencrypted). Transmitting on an ATC frequency may land you in jail real quick, but then again that's not what we're talking about. There's nothing here that should be considered "too much information" and the fact that you seem to think this behavior is dangerous is troubling in my opinion.

      I also consider myself an "aviation geek" -- I've taken a few lessons myself. I'm also a ham radio operator. There is nothing suspicious or illegal about these hobbies or interests. Stop adding to the mass paranoia.

      --
      "Before criticizing someone, first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, you'll be a mile away... and you'll have his shoes."
    78. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I stopped my rocket playing when WalMart stopped selling the lettered engines and other places basically raised the prices making the part time hobby not really worth the money. We went back to kites but that was just as boring as it was the first time we flew them. There was nothing to talk about with the science behind them because we did that already.

    79. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell, in America you can make an army of one!

    80. Re:Sounds familiar. by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      Also Dry Ice is far safer than the old MacGyver Hydrochloric acid and tinfoil in a soda bottle. They were all the rage around here after that episode came out.

    81. Re:Sounds familiar. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      It is domestic conservative and religious organizations that are poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people.

      Maybe some do, but my church, at least, encourages its members to obtain as broad a secular education as possible, and as a whole it's what you'd call "conservative".

    82. Re:Sounds familiar. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      The only time I have would ever have been afraid to take a picture was when my Dad worked at the Pentagon and he took me in for a tour. I was searched before entering and they guard stationed at the door looked through my camera bag (he even found a hidden pocket I didn't know about) then said "I'll let you take your camera in but if it leaves the bag we will have to confiscate it."

      Now I didn't remove the camera from my bag as I could see they had cameras nearly everywhere we walked.

      However, you will have to agree, inside the freaking Pentagon is a pretty understandable place to ban photography.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    83. Re:Sounds familiar. by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      I encourage you to practice! Suspicious people will always be suspicious, but less insane ones will realize what you're doing as long as you yourself feel good about it, too. So practice, or those who would terrorize you are winning :)

    84. Re:Sounds familiar. by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      I guess, in a strict sense, it is a bomb after all.

      Actually, it's a bomb in a loose sense - the same definition of "bomb" that applies to popping bubble wrap or balloons, or a rectum - "A vessel which contains compressed gases."

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    85. Re:Sounds familiar. by raddan · · Score: 1

      "with whom"

      Just trying to keep us competitive. Cheers!

    86. Re:Sounds familiar. by Xcruciate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't care what anybody says, the terrorists from 9/11 have accomplished what they set out to do. They have turned our country and most of the world into paranoid land. That is a worse fate than the deaths of 3,000 + people. We are afraid of our own countrymen now.

      --
      It's like "looking busy" at your employment - it's actually easier to do real work than to fake it. - bmo
    87. Re:Sounds familiar. by Quartinus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In today's age, if I started messing with liquid fuels, or built rockets over 6 feet tall, I would likely get harassed by local law enforcement (or more likely my neighbors would call for them), assuming I could even get the proper permits to be allowed to build the thing... permits to build something with my own two hands and then test it out on my friend's private property (a farm)? CRAZY, and wrong.

      While that may draw some odd looks, there is a regulated process by which you can build that kind of thing. Building a six-foot tall rocket is not illegal (I have done it many a time, the largest I have built was a two-stage 11 foot sounding rocket, staging from a K1100T (about 256 times more powerful than a C) to a J1299L (about 128 times more powerful than a C)), and no permits of any kind are required to build it. You do need a certification (or to know someone with a certification) to buy larger propellants, which basically help you to be less of a hazard to others (because presumably if you have a Level 1 or 2 or 3 certification, you know somewhat what you are doing). You do know about the NAR, right?

      In short, rocketry is not illegal, but you do need to know what you are doing so that you don't kill or injure people people.

    88. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares about coulter. She's a bitter cunt.

    89. Re:Sounds familiar. by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

      In the late 90s I was driving my car in a rainstorm and splashed a little girl. My first impulse was to stop and offer her a ride home...

      Which I couldn't do because any middle aged man getting out of a car and offering a ride to a little girl is automatically a pervert. So I called the police and told them where I was and what happened. They said they would send someone around to check on her.

      Now ... fast forward to 2003. I was in India on business and had gone to the mall with one of my co-workers to get a few things. We were at the top of a very tall and open escalator but couldn't get on because a man and two kids were in the way. The man was holding his young daughter in his arms and trying to get the young, frightened, teary-eyed boy to get on the escalator. My friend just picked the boy up without saying a word, got on the escalator, and we all rode down. At the bottom, my friend set the boy down, the man thanked my friend and we all went our merry way. No one called security or yelled out 'stranger danger'.

      Sometimes I wonder what the definition of 'civilized' really means....

      --
      I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
    90. Re:Sounds familiar. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 3, Funny

      "I am a Citizen of the State of Texas"

      You have my deepest and most sincere sympathies regarding your most unfortunate circumstance.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    91. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems that you have learned to fear many simple things, and yet you still had the gumption to post this to Slashdot... and not even as an AC!
      Obviously, there you have far too many freedoms.
      This will be resolved shortly, carry on.

    92. Re:Sounds familiar. by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      It is domestic conservative and religious organizations that are poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people.

      I'm a Christian. Specifically, I'm a member of the Lutheran Church Missouri Synod. My grandfather was also a (southern) Baptist Minister. There may be specific fringe religious people out there expressing political views and trying to advance some agenda, but I'm certainly not. And I don't know any other Christian who is either. This includes church elders. They may be trying to protect their freedoms with regard to certain politically touchy subjects, like for example whether a 16 year old can get an abortion or contraceptives without parents hearing about it. But that's very different from claiming that they're sapping the will to learn from the people.

      My kids are attending the private Christian school (K through 8) associated with my church. You may be shocked to hear that they're being taught about evolution in science class, and Christianity in religion class.

      Christians are definitely against police-state tendencies and are pro-freedom. The last thing we want is the government coming down on Christian schools and churches.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    93. Re:Sounds familiar. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Let me rephrase what he was saying.

      Complying with an officer's requests, even if they are unbacked by law, is personally prudent. They don't see you as an uppity citizen, and rather as a compliant sheep. It's best if your immediate personal safety and convenience are a priority.

      I care a fair bit about liberty and stuff, but at the same time it would be incredibly harmful to my family if I were detained, arrested, possibly lost my job for not showing up, lost my employer's trust because now I have an arrest on my record, etc (even if not a conviction - people are quick to judge). I'm quite happy to delete a picture, especially now that I know I can just recover it later, if it means I can (usually) skip all of that.

    94. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't delete any photos. Get a copy of The Photographer's Right from http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm, and stick it in your camera bag if you're worried. Just because some rentacop has an attitude doesn't mean you need to change your behavior.

      Unless you're on private property, which is true most of the time.

    95. Re:Sounds familiar. by ndavis · · Score: 1

      However, you will have to agree, inside the freaking Pentagon is a pretty understandable place to ban photography.

      Oh yes although I was shocked at how nice the guards were inside and outside the Pentagon. Growing up near a military base some of the members seemed to think they didn't need to be polite. It seems the military has changed from when I was a kid or maybe its the people that join.

    96. Re:Sounds familiar. by Quartinus · · Score: 1

      That's not crazy at all. What would be the range of a 6ft rocket?

      Depending on apogee, weight, impulse, deployment altitude, et cetera, it would entirely depend. I have seen a six-foot long rocket land 20 feet from the launchpad with an apogee of 200-300 feet, because it had a very small motor.

      What kind of damage can it do with fuel still in it?

      Well, if properly configured with a parachute and other recovery systems, very little. You would need some kind of automatic electronic recovery system (a PerfectFlite miniAlt/WD would suffice) for deployment.

    97. Re:Sounds familiar. by gknoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly. Challenging their authority will lead to all sorts of pain, and potentially ancillary charges like resisting arrest, if they get creative. I'm glad for the info on the phtographer's rights page -- I read that several years ago, and saved it. I'm quite thankful that some people exercise their photographer's rights; it just won't be me, I think.

    98. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Woosh

    99. Re:Sounds familiar. by mikael · · Score: 1

      KLM used to sell or give away wall-posters of the flight-deck of their aircraft.

      To think back in the 70's, pilots on international flights used to allow parents and children to visit the flight deck.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    100. Re:Sounds familiar. by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      But, terrifingly, such a concept didn't even make it out of the internet muckraking circles. And that's why we have this problem, because people think the ends justify the means.

      This is the problem, the people in power don't have a fucking clue.

      My kingdom for a mod point.

    101. Re:Sounds familiar. by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

      And private property or not, the OP is most likely going to need an FAA waiver to launch such a large rocket (over 3.3 lbs total liftoff mass or more than 125 grams of propellant mass).

      The best advice is to join NAR or Tripoli, find a local club and launch with them. The club does all the FAA paperwork, and can help you get certified to whatever level you want.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    102. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Croskey quote is not his, but a (mis)quote from a 1938 Cal. supreme court case Gabrielli V. Knickerbocker (http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7174210606702844173&q=In+re+Shinn&hl=en&as_sdt=80000002&as_vis=1)

      Strangely, the citation is missing in the published opinion, perhaps because of a misquote by Croskey that tends to change to tenor of the original.

    103. Re:Sounds familiar. by potat0man · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Normally I agree with the advice of, "Just do what your told, forget it, move along, keep your head down, it's not worth it."

      Normally that's good advice if you're busy, the issue is particularly petty or you're particularly vulnerable in some way like you're on probation or you're far from home. The problem is that if everybody follows the advice, and nobody is willing to take the risk of standing up for himself, or someone else. And nobody ever sticks his neck out, then your abuse will multiply rather than simply go away.

      Yeah, you might be far from home, just waiting for a train to get you out of there. In that case, shutting up and being cowardly may be advisable. But if you're not, if you're home and there are people you know who can post bail, and showing up to court a half-dozen times won't involve an inter-state trip, I'd say it's time to stand up for yourself. Nobody else will. Too many people are heeding the advice to, "shutup and move along, let someone with a spine correct police abuse, you don't want to deal with that!"

      People can only abuse you to the extent you allow them to.

      And when you see someone get himself arrested over something you think is silly. Instead of calling him a fool and telling him not to forget the KY, you should applaud him for standing up for his rights because ultimately he's also standing up for yours.

    104. Re:Sounds familiar. by Mal-2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is because not telling you how to do it is simpler, faster, and incurs less liability than having to explain how to do it RIGHT. There's more to making explosives than just the chemicals that go into them.

      They know full well that if you really want to do it yourself, the information is out there. They just don't want the remaining fingers pointed at THEM when it blows up in someone's hand.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    105. Re:Sounds familiar. by inflamed · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the reason not to use encryption on your own wireless network.

    106. Re:Sounds familiar. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      he war against American intellect is not affected by any outside foreign power as far as I can tell, unless of course you count the Vatican and they are at best a minor player. No, it waged internally be people who's power base relies on people not asking questions and just doing as they are told. It is domestic conservative and religious organizations that are poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people.

      Hey, you forgot all the people who think it's just the "domestic conservative and religious organizations that are poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people."

      Often the truth lies in between the two or more extremes. This is nothing but a raging example of that. The only reason you pick a single portion is because you are biased and don't see the other side. This makes you what you are decrying and the ability to learn seems to have stopped there too.

    107. Re:Sounds familiar. by Leebert · · Score: 1

      :) I still do those things, but there is always some trepidation in the back of my mind.

      Understand, of course, that fearing something doesn't mean you don't do it. Alas, I'm somewhat of the opinion that irrationally fearing something almost obligates you to do it, to get over the fear.

    108. Re:Sounds familiar. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Large Dangerous Rocket Ships

      Science Channel (USA) July 5th, 9 PM eastern time.

      The (legendary) Rocket Manual For Amateurs is online as a PDF.

      What the heck, grab a PDF of the LONG out of print Golden Book of Chemistry while you're at it.

      Hey, kids! Set up your OWN chemistry lab bench and do real chemical experiments.

      Like safely generating Chlorine gas.

      Science Is FUN!

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    109. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      What kind of damage can fireworks do? What's the range of a propane tank if the pressure valve is knocked off? What kind of damage can an RC airplane do if filled with a homemade pipe bomb (lots of firecrackers + PVC pipe, end caps, and a remote fuze)? How destructive can a dirt bike be if the user loses control just before a hill (those things can truly fly sometimes!)
       
        Anything can be made to sound dangerous. As we continue to give up our right to liberty and our right to pursue happiness (and limiting my ability to play with rockets does limit both of these), we will never get it back.
       
      "They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security." —Benjamin Franklin

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    110. Re:Sounds familiar. by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      This typifies the draconian over-reaction by our ever increasingly repressive, police state. What makes matters worse is that no one can stand up to it, at the very least you will be marginalized and labeled a crank and at the worst you will be whisked away in secret to a foreign prison never to be heard from again.

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    111. Re:Sounds familiar. by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I am going down for a computer related crime, I want to be the one responsible for committing it. Sorry, but I am not setting up an open unsecured network that I am ultimately responsible for. Seeing I don't have carrier status, I am not immune from being prosecuted for whatever child porn my neighbor wants to peruse on my connection. And having an unsecured Wi-Fi router has been proven to not stand up as a defense in such cases. Not only that, no matter how much information "wants to be free", I still seem to have to pay for my internet connection and don't see why others should not have to do the same.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    112. Re:Sounds familiar. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Oh yes although I was shocked at how nice the guards were inside and outside the Pentagon. Growing up near a military base some of the members seemed to think they didn't need to be polite. It seems the military has changed from when I was a kid or maybe its the people that join.

      The Pentagon has a LOT of civilian workers and a LOT of brass. The person a guard pisses off could well be the person who interfaces with their chain of command. They also realize that they are a tourist location (of sorts) and have to maintain a good public appearance. (Also, you effectively had an escort with you who would harm his career if he let you take pictures)

      When I was going to the Air Force Academy, the guards there were also very open (The Academy itself was open as well, but I was there prior to 9/11) Tourist military spots tend to be nice. They are PR for the military.

      Having been on military bases, foreign military sites, civilian government security sites, and contractor sites. Here is my experience.

      Military (as a contractor): They generally know what is and is not a threat. They let you carry the stapler with you. Besides, M-4 beats stapler AND paper.

      Gov: They manage their threats with red tape. The is not on the list of approved items, so you must go get this form signed by people so far up the chain that they are probably in a senate hearing, so good luck getting it signed.

      Contractor: The government is confusing as hell, and we aren't sure what they want, so rather than risk anything and cause us to lose our contract, your stapler is prohibited. In addition, using scotch tape to bind papers is also prohibited since it emulates the function of the stapler.

      However for all three you will likely have to take a 1 hour web seminar on proper use of an information packaging device.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    113. Re:Sounds familiar. by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      It could hit something and break a window - it's on a farm, though, what are the odds? And really, are you going to argue that any risk is too great?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    114. Re:Sounds familiar. by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know many Christians personally as well, hundreds, possibly a thousand. My uncle is Treasurer for the Southern Baptist Convention in Mississippi. I was raised in a "good christian home" with brainwashing, violence and fear every single day.

      From my personal experience, you and your church, as you have explained them, are exceptions to the rule.

    115. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank you for the information. I wasn't saying that it was illegal, I was simply pointing out that 50 years ago, the attitude was "play, learn, build, and play some more until you get to college and learn to build even bigger toys." This excited kids (don't you remember those home chemistry kits? Now we've got someone getting arrested for playing with dried ice and a plastic bottle!?!).
       
      Today's attitude is "if it could be slightly dangerous, it shouldn't be allowed, and if a minor is doing it, punish the parent."
       
      We need to foster more creativity, exploration, and (yes) dangerous activities into our children's lives, not less, otherwise our society will stagnate, and we'll fall into ruin.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    116. Re:Sounds familiar. by howardd21 · · Score: 1

      This is an incredibly insightful post. We have become a people that does not allow for risk anymore; insuring everything including a $9.99 purchase at Best Buy ("would you like the black tie protection with that generic mouse...?"), and then immediately seeking to blame somebody when a problem or unexpected issue occurs. For crying out loud, discovery by some form of trial and error is incredibly important. Stop with the eradication of risk.

      --
      no comment
    117. Re:Sounds familiar. by Plugh · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid anymore to walk to the end of the platform and look down the subway tunnels. I'm afraid to take pictures of bridges. I'm afraid to be just plain curious, because it's apparently abnormal and suspicous. It's getting ridiculous. And it's going to come back and bite us in the butt.

      Don't be afraid. Join others who are working to change it.

    118. Re:Sounds familiar. by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but anti-thought is not compatible with actually being liberal.

      Democratic party? Not a liberal organization.

      I didn't pick a single portion, I only picked the most egregious examples of violators.

    119. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many times can you misspell "Amtrak" in one post?

    120. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jeremi · · Score: 0

      What have we spent since? What have we "gained" in the war of terror? In terms of dollars to outcome; we have lost. Terribly.

      I generally agree, but on the other hand it's impossible to say for sure what would have happened if we hadn't spent all of that money and effort. Would there have been more attacks? Were there terrorists who would have attacked, but were intimidated by all the "security theater"? (after all, if security theater is primarily done for its psychological impact, then there's not reason to think it wouldn't affect the psychology of the 'bad guys' as well) We'll probably never know.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    121. Re:Sounds familiar. by ktappe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And if the cops ask you to delete photos, play along, because recovering the deleted photographs is trivial compared to what can happen when arguing with a cop.

      Great practical advice. However, it's horrible civil disobedience advice. By complying with the officer's illegal demand, you're empowering him to make the same demand of other photographers who might not be as technically adept and who really will lose their photos. A bully appeased is a bully emboldened.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    122. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      People are afraid that your 1.8 meter wonder might explode in their backyard

      Well, in this particular case, I'd have to have built a very successful rocket to get outside this couple dozen acre farm.
       
      People could be afraid my fireworks will burn down their house, afraid that my potato launcher could injure their kid, afraid that my faith will 'corrupt' their child... people can be afraid of many things, but should they be able to restrict me from pursuing my own happiness just because of the possibility of my pursuit hurting them? Should I not be able to use p2p software because it could possibly cause 'injury' to someone else's copyrights?
       
      Once we reach a point where creating the possibility that a crime might occur is, in and of itself, wrong, and punishable as a crime, we move further in a direction that scares the crap out of me, and I don't want to live in the kind of country that mentality will produce.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    123. Re:Sounds familiar. by wsanders · · Score: 1

      When you're as paranoid, you're never alone since they are always out to get you.

      --
      Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    124. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Wish I could mod you up. :-)

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    125. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Funny

      the same definition of "bomb" that applies to popping bubble wrap or balloons, or a rectum - "A vessel which contains compressed gases."

      Oh great. Now they're going to close down all the Taco Bells in the airports. Thanks a lot!

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    126. Re:Sounds familiar. by cmotdibbl3r · · Score: 1

      An Ankh-Morporkian standing alone would only last a millisecond before cut-me-own-throat Dibbler shows up to sell them a sausage inna bun.

    127. Re:Sounds familiar. by Chris+Tucker · · Score: 1

      Thanks! The thought is taken for the deed, and is greatly appreciated.

      --
      Guaranteed! This comment 100% Anthrax free!
    128. Re:Sounds familiar. by websitebroke · · Score: 1

      Flying into Islamabad, Pakistan, the flight attendant announced that it was illegal to take aerial photos. Sad to hear this nonsense is coming to a country that should know better.

    129. Re:Sounds familiar. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Most of the so called liberal organizations in this country really don't fit the correct definition of the word "liberal".

      Wrong. "Liberal" has a meaning that relies on context, so "liberal" in the USA in 2010 is different from "liberal" in 1900 or "liberal" in Europe.

      "Liberal" organizations today most certainly are "liberal". Basically, you're trying to bring up the fallacious No True Scotsman argument.

    130. Re:Sounds familiar. by Evtim · · Score: 1

      Reasonable? According to....?

      What I am afraid of is that tomorrow the powers of the day might find me, or you, unreasonable all of a sudden and the list is still there. Once a tool is created, someone will use it.

    131. Re:Sounds familiar. by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you might be far from home, just waiting for a train to get you out of there. In that case, shutting up and being cowardly may be advisable.

      What may also work is to just start recording the confrontation, be as compliant as possible, get as much information from the officer as possible, and avoid escalation. When the interaction is over, contact the ombudsman and/or an attorney, and use all legal recourses available to you to make sure that others don't get treated similarly.

      You should be able to avoid arrest, and still later stand up for your rights. (You also have the advantage of not having any charges to counteract the effect of your complaint.)

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    132. Re:Sounds familiar. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Or you could just get the officers badge number, write down a detailed summary of events, ask some bystanders if you could use them as witnesses, and then sue the police department for infringing on your rights.

      Arguing with a cop is ALWAYS a bad idea. Do what you're told, take notes, and sort it out after. Anything else will just aggravate the situation.

    133. Re:Sounds familiar. by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Oddly I read it just like that without the context. Perhaps it's because the idea of a "collective society [...] where everyone would be interdependent" always kind of bothered me. Not in some "omg the socialists" kind of way, but in a helpless cattle kind of way where nobody can (or cares to) fix their own leaky faucets. Obviously I still make use of doctors, the electricity in my home, basic sanitation services, etc. You can only take it so far without serious compromises. ;)

      But F* Ann Coulter anyways.

    134. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      needs to be on a magnetic disk, an SD memory card won't work.

    135. Re:Sounds familiar. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      It is when the thought is just as controlled as any other regiment you see. And yes, I know the difference between the democrat party and liberal even though the one is often called the other.

      If you do not believe me, just go to any self proclaimed liberal person, including yourself, and ask them why there can't be a god that created the world as we know it and science might explain how it could have happened independent but if it was possible that it was just made that way. You will find that there is no tolerance unless you think the exact way they want you to think.

      And just to point out, you don't have to ask about a religious topic. Suggest that global warming may be wrong and that it needs further study or that you want proof that the known known's of it aren't manipulated fabrications of real or near real evidence designed to advance a political agenda, stand back because you will generally get a worse reaction then mentioning religion.

      But those are just two suggestive topics. This problem is nothing new, the guy who discovered that most stomach ulcers were bacterial problems that could be cured instead of just treating the symptoms lived thought a decade or better of ridicule because the thinkers insisted they knew it was impossible for bacteria to set up shop in the acid environment of the stomach.

      Or even take your own statement here in which you are pressing anti-thought because you believe that the accusation of anti-thought isn't compatible with liberal. It's a matter of semantics in reality, it's an expressed bias which is also hidden to the biased but the reality is that if you allow thought, then you allow the exploration of that which you do not agree with. If you reached a conclusion and insist on it being the only right answer, then you are what you were decrying. And that was the point, not that democrats are liberal or anything. It's that as soon as you limit it to your notion of what you know, you have become the very same thing you railed on "people who's power base relies on people not asking questions and just doing as they are told" and "poisoning the American spirit and sapping the will to learn from the people".

    136. Re:Sounds familiar. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Yes, if you're on private property and you're asked to stop taking pictures, you should. They can even ask you to leave the premises, but they still can't make you delete what's on your camera already.

    137. Re:Sounds familiar. by 32771 · · Score: 1

      "Individual talent is too sporadic and unpredictable to be allowed any important part in the organization society. Social systems which endure are built on the average person who can be trained to occupy any position adequately if not brilliantly."
      -Stuart Chase, The Proper Study of Mankind, 1948.

      What is wrong with that?
      Sure it might leave some geniuses out there disgruntled but you would stress society far too much if you would only cater to the genius.

      --
      Je me souviens.
    138. Re:Sounds familiar. by skywire · · Score: 1

      So you caught Dewey contradicting himself. Not surprising for a human being. Or maybe he was being sarcastic. Or lying. But on which occasion? Neither side is going to be able to offer in soundbites on slashdot a convincing case for or against Dewey's and others' having deliberately designed an educational system intended to create dull, submissive industrial robots. Confirmation of that must be left as an exercise.

      --
      Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
    139. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Our schools have been scientifically designed to prevent over-education from happening. The average American [should be] content with their humble role in life, because they're not tempted to think about any other role."

      Ironically, if you apply this argument against "over-education" to a neural net, you get a better, opposite result.

    140. Re:Sounds familiar. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      What may also work is to just start recording the confrontation, be as compliant as possible, get as much information from the officer as possible, and avoid escalation.

      Here in MD, an audio recording could get you into actual legal trouble, which is a ridiculous side effect of our wiretapping laws. I agree that you should avoid escalation, but you really don't have to delete your pictures.

    141. Re:Sounds familiar. by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I can see it now. The rent a cop or police tell you to delete your picture, you put both hands down your pants, and just point at him saying smell my finger first while pulling out the Photographer's Rights paper.

    142. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      My point was simply to show that such a soundbite was at best meaningless. Chances are the rest in that list are too. I'd never even heard of Dewey until I read that quote, but it was so blatantly one-sided it triggered my "too good to be true" alarm - no one of any significance makes statements that are so self-damning as that one appears. Anyone taking them at face value is just raising a red flag about their own credulity.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    143. Re:Sounds familiar. by potat0man · · Score: 2, Informative

      What are you going to sue for though? An officer asked you to do something (stop taking photos, delete photos) And you voluntarily did. You had the right to refuse, but you chose to comply. Without the officer using physical force or actually placing you under arrest it seems like it would be nearly impossible for you to argue that your rights were infringed upon since you were simply voluntarily complying with a request. That's not infringing on your rights, it's just someone asking you to do something.

      Arguing with a cop is ALWAYS a bad idea.

      Arguing yes, but asserting your rights, absolutely not. Getting arrested isn't the end of the world.

    144. Re:Sounds familiar. by potat0man · · Score: 1

      I somewhat agree with complying and then taking it up with the police department/city hall/DA later. But what do you do when you complain about an officer making threats to arrest photographers and the chief tells you he's right and you better comply or you will be arrested? Without an actual arrest taking place, there aren't very effective ways of escalating the issue to the people who need to review it.

    145. Re:Sounds familiar. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "It's best if your immediate personal safety and convenience are a priority."

      No, it is not. See the people who get shot in the back after they've been subdued and on the ground. (BART Incident)

      Your only safe recourse is to fight with your fucking life. If you refuse to make the statement that you will not tolerate this bullshit, they will continue to pull this bullshit.

      Lying down makes you non-patriotic and a fucking coward to boot.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    146. Re:Sounds familiar. by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      Here in MD, an audio recording could get you into actual legal trouble, which is a ridiculous side effect of our wiretapping laws.

      What's amusing is that MD doesn't actually disallow audio recordings when there is no reasonable expectation of privacy... but presumably an officer who objected to photographs would also object to being recorded. Ah, the modern police state...

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    147. Re:Sounds familiar. by tokul · · Score: 1

      Once we reach a point where creating the possibility that a crime might occur is,

      It is not about crime. It is about harming others due to carelessness or lack of technical knowledge.

      If people saw your rocket, you were not building it in distant farm. You were building it within flying distance of their private property. 6 feet. That thing is taller than me and it would look dangerous especially if it also stands on some pad and you are not rocket scientist. Even rocket scientists f..ked up 49 years and 9 months ago.

    148. Re:Sounds familiar. by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      But what do you do when you complain about an officer making threats to arrest photographers and the chief tells you he's right and you better comply or you will be arrested?

      That's why I mentioned the ombudsman or retaining legal counsel. It may certainly be more effective if you are arrested, but you don't have to be arrested to have your civil liberties abridged.

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    149. Re:Sounds familiar. by casca69 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you think it does sound familiar? Me too.Rather Orwellian. 1984ish. Scary, but that is the truth. What used to be encouraged and thought the epitome of our ability is now a scary and dangerous thing We have given the Terrorists so much power, instead of doing as you do with ANY child, isolate and ignore. Sure, they do bad things. Spank 'em and be done. Don't tell me I can't be genuinely curious about something and then want to pull a gun because I want a reasonable explanation. Ok, my sopabox is put away. Sorry.

    150. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      As someone who was arrested (turned myself in) and prosecuted for trying draino "bombs" in a safe area, with no people present, in the middle of the night... I know you can't mess around with these stupid little things anymore. One of them didn't pop, and no kidding, a bomb squad was called in. This was years before 9/11.

      Slingshots, pop bottle "bombs", firecrackers, pocket knives, laser pointers, video or still cameras, potato guns, chemistry sets, any other rudimentary projectile devices or things that go "pop" are all more trouble than they're worth anymore.

      Kids need to stay inside, play e-rated video games and eat hot pockets from here-on-out if they want to avoid serious run-in's with the authorities.

    151. Re:Sounds familiar. by the_womble · · Score: 1

      I remember reading the Foundation series as a teenager and thinking it a bit silly, and it does not help that it is not particularly well written.

      I read it last year and thought it insightful, and, given when it was written, prophetic.

    152. Re:Sounds familiar. by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 1
      And if the cops ask you to delete photos, play along,

      What?. Isn't that destroying evidence (or potential evidence)?

    153. Re:Sounds familiar. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Who is the Commander for their special forces?

      I'll deal with him personally. Give me all relevant details.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    154. Re:Sounds familiar. by Xonstantine · · Score: 1

      Neither do the 53% of the American voting public that elected someone like Obama who in turn nominated Sotomayor and Kagan, neither one of whom think there are any restraints to government power other than that which lies in their perfect, judicial hearts. In the end, we get the government we deserve.

    155. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We should form an underground militia and make plans to take out all these people who are opposed to curiosity.

    156. Re:Sounds familiar. by potat0man · · Score: 1

      Practically speaking though, if you're of limited means. Getting arrested does two things. 1. Depending upon your financial state and the state you are arrested in, you could have access to a free attorney who will take your case through the court system where you will get proper oversight of the officer's actions. 2. It opens the city up to a bit of liability if it is found that the officer acted unreasonabley so it would be easier to obtain counsel when there is a possibility of a contingency fee from a settlement.

      If you're rich or just especially miffed, maybe money's not an issue in which case retaining legal counsel without an arrest would also be an option.

    157. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am a Citizen of the State of Texas"

      You have my deepest and most sincere sympathies regarding your most unfortunate circumstance.

      I've taken my children (ages 5yrs and younger) out to the field next to our home in Texas and blow our mushy halloween pumpkins up with dry ice bombs... No one came knocking on my door or chased me down for a such clearly defiant "child endangment and possession of a destructive device". People are such fools sometimes, we had better ban Mythbusters for promoting bad behavior!
      Just wait till things get bad enough that Texas secedes from the Nation because its been over run by people like this...
      Texas 1 The rest of you 0...
      - Happy Texan

    158. Re:Sounds familiar. by MWoody · · Score: 1

      Waaaait a minute. A six foot tall liquid-fueled rocket? On the ground at your farm, sure, that's safe. But it's a ROCKET. You obviously don't intend for it to STAY on the ground. And you don't own the airspace above a certain level.

      My sympathy for your desire to experiment or engage in your hobby ends when you begin threatening to fire explosive devices into commercial airspace.

    159. Re:Sounds familiar. by P0ltergeist333 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the SCOTUS that appointed a president was SUCH a model of government restraint.

      --
      One of these days I'm going to cut you into little pieces. - PF
    160. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tanks for the link,

      Posting anonymously for a reason. I come form Finland which i supposed to have the best education system around. My personal beef is that people around here ASSUME that the only way to learn is by school. If you haven't got formal education about it its impossible you know it, they can understand that at some technical level its supposedly possible but no never happens. Yet I passed most of my engineering master studies without EVER attending a single course. When for some reason I had to show up for something mandatory, I was first confused as to what value they were teaching. Then pragmatically solved the thing in record time. I once failed all the requirements of a course but passed since in mandatory laboratory training I was the only one to get the assignment done in allotted time, with the only faulty piece of equipment. As the lab exercise neared the end the professor walked in and asked did they actually fix that equipment where I promptly told him no its broken but this is a exercise in controlling mechanisms, i tough that was the part of the puzzle and compensated for it in code. So I failed and passed because the professor said that he couldn't let the only person who understood anything flunk the course.

    161. Re:Sounds familiar. by the_womble · · Score: 1

      Putting my tin foil hat on, they may be very happy with that result: people who think for themselves are, potentially, far more disruptive than any terrorist.

      More likely, they have limited sympathy for such people, because they think them weird trouble makers - "if you want a pastime, watch TV like everyone else"

    162. Re:Sounds familiar. by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      Hell, even Cookie Monster only gets to eat one cookie a day now.

    163. Re:Sounds familiar. by Xonstantine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, the SCOTUS that appointed a president was SUCH a model of government restraint.

      That's how the Democratic narrative goes, but the reality was a *bit* different. The Florida Supreme Court kept trying to redefine election law and using variable standards until they found a result that would result in the election of Al Gore. Ironically, the only one that would have resulted in an actual Gore victory (re-count of all Florida votes instead of just targeting Broward county) is the one that Gore and the Florida Supreme Court were afraid to try. Team Gore wasn't exactly being a champion of democracy in this affair.

      And in actual regards to the conservative members of the Supreme Court, they have a much better track record siding with the individual than the government as compared to the "liberal" members of the court, everything from Kelo vs Connecticut to Heller vs DC and McDonald vs Chicago. About the only thing the minority members can agree the government can't do is outlaw abortion.

    164. Re:Sounds familiar. by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      How this got modded up is beyond me. The is the most thinkly veiled attack on conservatism to date on Slashdot. This post has nothing to do with facts or observations but instead is based in biggoted ideas and wrong stereotypes brought to their own ugly conclusions.

      I would argue that the opposite is true. Families brought up in a conservative house with Christian principles are more likely then not to encourage a good education and motivate their children to become productive members of society. I will not stoop to the level of saying that families lacking these principles will not do the same thing. However I will submit that I have personally met some very unmotivated people in my life and when I ask those people what their beliefs are it turns out they have none or they cherry pick whatever is in vogue at the moment.

      Most importantly, people of faith and conviction are taught to question the order of things. Remember that Christs followers are always in the minority even when it appears not. This is because when left to their own devices people choose self over right. Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.

      To say that the conservative and Religious are the mindless sheep is to turn reality on its head; to call black, white; to call light dark; and to consequently get trampled at the next Zebra Crossing.

    165. Re:Sounds familiar. by nopainogain · · Score: 1

      "even Cookie Monster only gets to eat one cookie a day now" reminded of family guy episode where cookie's in rehab and calls the orderlies nazis

    166. Re:Sounds familiar. by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      Notre Dame - catholic university
      Duke University - Methodist school
      Wake Forest - Baptist school
      Harvard - Puritan/unitarian

      That's off the top of my head - among the top institutions of higher learning in the world. Christians and education are hardly strange bedfellows.

    167. Re:Sounds familiar. by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      Probably just depends on whether or not the person is either (a.) overly concerned and diligent (and unable to make an assessment of what is reasonable) or (b.) has a far overdeveloped sense of authority and needs to boss someone around.

      More like (c) is tasked with enforcing rules made by people well above her pay grade and in control of her continued employment.

      It's like the "all electronic devices off" command. I almost always wear a Bose noice-cancelling headset plugged into the aircraft sound system. Of all the people on the plane, I can probably hear the official announcements better than anyone else, and yet I have had waitresses demand that I turn them off -- which leaves me not able to hear anything. I've taken to covering the red led with black tape so it cannot be seen.

      I'm not sure if this is a bad thing, either. It may be worse having non-technical people trying to make decisions about technical devices than for blanket rules that create an inconvenience at worst.

    168. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      Ok, I admit my penchant for larger rockets could warrant some type of licensing, but what about chemistry in my basement? Should that be cause for concern? What about building robots in my back yard, should that raise red flags?
       
      These types of activities would also receive the same type of "paranoid neighbor" issue as my previous example, but really should not!

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    169. Re:Sounds familiar. by Sethumme · · Score: 1

      In many ways, it's the sort of cherry-picked, onslaught of soundbites like Svartalf provided that shutdown all rational, independent thought in people who lack cynicism, eventually creating enough unintelligible rage that society reacts broadly by locking down freedoms and independence.

    170. Re:Sounds familiar. by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      It snowed in Houston last winter. I took a picture of some cars covered in snow. The security guard of the store they were parked outside chased me down and asked me why I was taking pictures of cars. He wouldn't believe me that I'd never seen snow before (despite my Australia accent.)

    171. Re:Sounds familiar. by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      All good in theory. However, all it takes to arrest you is "probable cause", and to hold you is a judge upholding a finding of "probable cause".

      You will likely be arrested, for being difficult, argumentative, and most importantly, acting suspiciously around a sensitive area.

      Either you have an attorney, which will cost you significant $$$, or you will be assigned a public defender, who will, in 95% of the cases stipulate (that is, agree), to probable cause. Bail will be set (very high, if your address can not be immediately verified, and this can take a few days), or not (if you are a suspected terrorist), and if you can not pay, you will be stuck in jail. If you can, you can expect to be called before the court and formally charged and asked to enter a plea within two weeks. More $$$ spent on a lawyer.

      Now, if the case is really weak, the district attorney might decide to drop it, but they are generally evaluated and rewarded for being "tough on crime", especially terrorism, so expect the I-dotting and T-crossing of formal charges and a criminal trial. If the DA thinks the case is weak, you might be offered a plea bargain for something like "disorderly conduct", placed on probation, and fined a few hundred or thousand dollars. The third option, is that charges will not be formally pressed, but can be pending until the statute of limitations runs out. 97% of criminal cases never go to trial: many are plea-bargained out.

      So, you decide to stand for your principles and face trial. Good for you! This will cost you plenty. Simply being arrested might have gotten you fired, particularly in an "at-will" employment state.

      The chances are pretty good that your defense will stand up. But, expect it to be very expensive. Justice does not come cheap, unfortunately.

      And, yes, this can have a very chilling effect on lawful public actions. In fact, people who fight for civil rights are USED to being impoverished, unemployed, and spending significant lengths of time in jail.

      How do I know? I went down this road after being arrested (and never formally charged) with felony child abuse for preventing my young son from not running into the middle of a busy highway. See, in his struggle, he managed to get a clothing abrasion mark on himself. I chose to plead guilty to disorderly conduct to FORCE (well, encourage: no DA can turn down the chance for another conviction in their notch) the DA to drop the charges rather than wait out the statute of limitations (and technically, I WAS guilty of disorderly conduct: acting in a manner (possibly trying to kidnap a child) that might incite someone to assault me (to "save" said child). Ironically, protecting him from himself would be an affirmative defense against assault, but would not be against DC.).

      Further, I reasoned that (a) charges could be laid any time within the statute of limitations, (b) my daughter had desired to leave her mother and live with me and pending felony assault charges would do me no good in that case, and (c) spending the money on a legal defense would arguably not be in the best interest of my children and therefore be used as evidence to charge me with neglect and abuse. The laws being what they are, if you have kids, the state owns you (and that's a subject for another rant).

      Now, if I was responsible for no one but myself, then Hell, f***ing yeah! Bring it on, a**holes!, and spend a lot of money and risk 10 to 20 in jail. I would think, however, that maybe one in a hundred are in a position where they are not responsible for the welfare of others, and of those, one in a thousand would risk incarceration to fight for their principles. Those of us who have responsibilities, or are otherwise cowardly in this regard, should therefore, vocally and peacefully support those who DO stand up for principle.

      --
      In Liberty, Rene
    172. Re:Sounds familiar. by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      I sincerely apologize for the poor behavior of those you know who claim to be followers of Christ. In my many experiences in many different churches, I have not seen the types of abuses you describe (my experiences match those of infinte9), though I know that they must exist in some churches, otherwise I would not run into people like you who are hurting from the wrongful acts of others who claim they follow Christ. On the whole, the majority of Christians are not out to destroy you or out to destroy education. The majority of Christians are trying to be good people, love those around them, pray to a loving God, and hope and pray that you might also find the happiness that they have in worshiping God and knowing his love.
       
      There are a lot of high profile "Christians" and "Christian" leaders who do not follow the teachings of Christ, and there are many "churches" which, like the religious teachers in Christ's day, "travel over land and sea to win a single convert, and when he becomes one, [they] make him twice as much a son of hell as [they themselves] are" (Matt. 15:23), and deserve the same chastising today that Christ gave the religious leaders back when he walked on the earth.
       
      Again, I apologize for the pain given to you by those who claim the name of Christian, and hope sincerely that you will encounter true believers who exemplify the love that Christ commands us to give, and that will treat you as the treasured and priceless creation of God that you are.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    173. Re:Sounds familiar. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      This isn't just a one sided political happening. While I will agree that some conservative thought demands that people "don't ask questions," we also face liberal thought that severely punishes "asking the wrong questions."

      Such as...?

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    174. Re:Sounds familiar. by CheeseTroll · · Score: 1

      OTOH, it *would* have been somewhat alarming if your friend had driven the boy down the escalator in his car, rather than picking him up.

      --
      A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
    175. Re:Sounds familiar. by geekgirlandrea · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They may be trying to protect their freedoms with regard to certain politically touchy subjects, like for example whether a 16 year old can get an abortion or contraceptives without parents hearing about it.

      Funny how those people's idea of 'protecting their freedom' invariably involves restricting someone else's.

    176. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother attended a highly regarded K-8 Christian school as well (in Colorado). He had a science book that had an illustration of a Geico-style cave man riding on the back of a brontosaurus carrying a Roman-style spear.

      A SCIENCE BOOK.

      When the entry to the "creation science museum" is dominated by a triceratops with a saddle on it.... depicting the likelihood (in their opinion) that people had once domesticated dinosaurs... They just don't gain a lot of respect....

      Thank you for not being a tool, no go spread more of the the "book of quit-being-a-retard" to everyone else, k? :-)

    177. Re:Sounds familiar. by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that this wasn't exactly what they planned. And yet, I'm fairly confident that they set out to do as much damage as they could and managed to make us create as much damage to ourselves than they ever dreamed about causing.

      --
      It is what it is.
    178. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a fucking retard.

      We don't live in "weird times". The death rate by malicious actions of others is at the lowest in the history of mankind. WE HAVE NEVER BEEN MORE SAFE. That is not disputable. There is NO statistical or evidentiary evidence to the contrary.

      We live in "overly saturated with media" times and nothing more. And clearly you consume a lot of said media.

      Pull your fucking head out of the sand.

    179. Re:Sounds familiar. by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Arguing yes, but asserting your rights, absolutely not. Getting arrested isn't the end of the world.

      We're making the same argument, then. Sure, tell them you think they're wrong. Tell them that you're complying with their orders only because they're in a position of authority. Asserting your rights won't get you arrested - being a dick, arguing endlessly, and refusing to comply will.

      That also answers your question about "what are you going to sue for". I think you misunderstood my position - I certainly wasn't suggesting complying without making at least a cursory objection.

    180. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One could argue that just because you don't take the attitude the rent-a-cop is giving you doesn't mean he won't claim you took a swing at him and club you unconscious.

    181. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except, he didn't say it.

      It was part of the 1961 ruling In re Shinn that actually affirmed the right to home schooling as long as minimum requirements of actually teaching were met.

      That guy's list of quotes looks like a cut-n-paste job from yet another blogger with zero ability or desire to fact-check.

    182. Re:Sounds familiar. by jc42 · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid anymore to walk to the end of the platform and look down the subway tunnels. I'm afraid to take pictures of bridges. I'm afraid to be just plain curious, because it's apparently abnormal and suspicous. It's getting ridiculous. And it's going to come back and bite us in the butt.

      It might be better if it did something painful like that.

      The real problem is that, in reality, the effect will more likely be a subtle, painless dampening of the willingness of the next generation to be openly curious.

      Curiosity and the willingness to investigate things we don't understand is the basis of the advanced science and technology that has made the American economy the powerhouse it is. Damping down that curiosity will decrease the "R&D" talents of the next generation.

      We're already seeing a lot of this, in the "productivity" part of the economy. While Americans still dominate the world in basic science and experimental engineering, the results are now mostly turned into products in other parts of the world. Our young people aren't going into industrial development much any more, because our industries don't "need" (i.e., want) a lot of people doing that sort of risky task.

      We can look forward to this process extending all the way to basic research, and we'll slowly become a second- and then a third-world economy.

      Or, alternatively, we can openly discuss stupid things like this story, publicly ridicule the people responsible, and try to get across the idea that we want our kids experimenting.

      So keep the stories coming. We need them made public, so we can see the problem and work on fighting the dummies responsible for it.

      (And why is the input textarea in this window only about 20 chars wide no matter how wide I make the window? Is there something I can do to make it revert to full window width?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    183. Re:Sounds familiar. by Steavis · · Score: 1

      Can I see your birth certificate?
      -or-
      Are you a citizen or legal resident of the United States?

      *ducks*

      Sorry, couldn't resist (and I don't associate myself with groups of either persuasion, but thought it was funny).

      --
      If Star Trek had the internet: Captain, we've received an IM from the romulans. "Surrender or be destroyed. LOL. o.O"
    184. Re:Sounds familiar. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Democrats ? Tolerant of differing viewpoints ? Yeah right ...

      Let's do a thought experiment. You live in a Texan village with lots of republicans. There's a football match. You wonder out loud about a few well established scientific theories.

      Now : you live in a democratic-as-hell suburb in a big city. The "we're destroying the world" athmosphere is so thick you have trouble breathing. There's a sporting event, obviously without a winner, because you know having a winner and a loser is discriminatory (even racist). You wonder out loud about several well established scientific theories.

      You say "I don't see how this big bang could ever have happened, isn't a repeating cycle more likely ?", you say "I wonder about climate, isn't it chaotic, are humans even capable of changing it ?", you say "I wonder about this DNA code and mutations, after all, seeing the code, it doesn't look anywhere near random", you say "I wonder if I could genetically modify bananas to look blue", you say "this God guy, he doesn't seem to be quite the same in all religions. I wonder what religions actually say about it".

      We all know there's going to be one town where you get yelled at. Tell me which it is ?

      Where do people get the idea that it's democrats that are tolerant of differing viewpoints ? And now I'm ready to be yelled at for disagreeing with the well-established "scientific consensus". You know, for disagreeing that the earth is flat (which is, and you know it, how a person born 50 years from now, knowing more than you do, will look at it).

      Democrats are a collective community, screaming "everyone should have their own opinions" in perfect unison. So perfect, in fact, you'd think something is making them do so. Half of them can barely spell correctly, but they sure know more about AI than a computer science graduate, especially how evil "the matrix" shows AI to be.

    185. Re:Sounds familiar. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      realism and "progressivism" do not go together. That, of course, doesn't stop anyone from yelling otherwise.

    186. Re:Sounds familiar. by CommieLib · · Score: 1

      As an American, I'm curious about your response, because my perception IS generally that it is an American problem. I mean, obviously aside from despotic regimes like Iran or North Korea, where curiosity is dangerous. If you have a more international perspective on the subject, I'd like to hear it.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    187. Re:Sounds familiar. by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I'm not really sure what you mean by "progressivism"... or why "realism" is relevant to the topic.

    188. Re:Sounds familiar. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      You shouldn't apologize. He's making stuff up to get even with this guy who sidelined him on his drive home. This is slashdot.

      You're encouraging his sort of behavior, sadly.

    189. Re:Sounds familiar. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Given that abortion, as progressives defend it, is not done for a medical reason. It's basically killing one human being for the mere comfort of another. Even medically it is perfectly well known that a human baby develops some form of thought within 18 days of conception, and anyone watching a echography movie of an abortion knows perfectly well that it DOES in fact feel pain.

      But almighty atheismo forbid you'd spray anything on insects. That's so cruel. Almighty atheismo, who incidentally "just happens" to be extremely intolerant of any alternative viewpoints.

      And these people don't just have idiotic self-contradicting viewpoints like that, they claim this makes them smarter. Heh.

      I wonder what their position is on killing know-it-all "progressives" for being too hard on the ears.

    190. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coward ... yes, (even that should tell you something).

      I have fond memories of experiments and fun that my friend and I had as dumb-ass teens. I do look back and ask "man; how do I have all of my sight, hair and fingers?"

      In my day if the cops came (and nothing we did provoked that), we'd probably just get a talking to - that would be it. Small lesson learned.

      This article suggests I should never allow my son or daughter to conceive of experimenting with such things. Why? not for safety's sake but I'd be protecting them from the risk of having a significant charge on their police record which will have detrimental effects on their travel rights & job prospects - Forever!

      To be clear though:
      Pressurizing a soda bottle: Low(ish) actual risk. - Police Record, over the top.
      Gun power and real explosives should be kept well away from kids/teens/adults that shit is fucking dangerous. Police record - Fuck yeah

    191. Re:Sounds familiar. by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Such a question should have been laughed out of the room, not because it was a silly question (and a gotcha with regard to a future question on Health Care), but because such a thing as the government being authorized to mandate to such a personal level as to what you must eat is laughably authoritarian."

      And many (most?) people don't really have a problem with authoritarian. As long as it suits them. Is the idea of a government passing such a law really far fetched? We pass laws telling people what they can't eat. Religions tell people what they can eat (Kosher, Halal). That doesn't seem to be a large issue as long as it has sufficient support.

      Good luck trying trying to overcome it.

    192. Re:Sounds familiar. by laura20 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, you give too much credit to Coulter. She took it from "None Dare Call It Education" , written by crazy Bircher John Stormer. Who quotes it from Human Events, which is mostly right-wing propaganda.

      Well, half of it-- the other half that she claims Dewey said, "You can't make socialists out of individualists", is actually Rosalie Gordon from "What's Happened To Our Schools", which was a rant back in the 1950s about the eeeevil of progressive education.

      If the quote exists at all, it's in Dewey's "Lectures in the Philosophy of Education", but there's no electronic copy and I'm not trawling through the whole thing, given the dodgy reputations of the people claiming the quote. And given that one of Dewey's major focuses was getting a child involved in their own education instead of just sitting in a chair and being lectured at; that's part of why Christian conservatives hate him.

    193. Re:Sounds familiar. by laura20 · · Score: 1

      Also note that "Lectures in the Philosophy of Education" isn't written by Dewey -- it's from a student's notes during Dewey's lectures at the University of Chicago. So even if the quote exists and isn't taken out of context (i.e., "Some say that children who think for themselves..." being negated), it's still secondhand at best.

    194. Re:Sounds familiar. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      For a good example of this, look at the lack of a response when one of our future Supreme Court justices didn't have a problem when asked, "Could I write a law that tells you what you have to eat?"

      Such a question should have been laughed out of the room, not because it was a silly question (and a gotcha with regard to a future question on Health Care),

      Is this the "gotcha" you refer to? If the government is stealing my money to pay for other people's healthcare (which they are), they better well be able to pass a law telling you what you have to eat. I'm all for letting people eat what they want, if I don't have to pay for the consequences of it.

    195. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back then the 20th century's two biggest examples of progressivism, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union had not yet seen the light of day.

      Did they teach you that in conservative troll camp, or does the knowledge appear on its own after swallowing enough of Glenn Beck's semen?

    196. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's because the terrorists have already won

    197. Re:Sounds familiar. by Thinboy00 · · Score: 1

      How will humanity progress without the geniuses? How will we reach for the stars (and colonize their planets)? You need geniuses if you want to progress at a remotely reasonable rate (just look at quantum mechanics for an example of rapid progression spurred by geniuses, keeping in mind that no work is wasted).

      --
      $ make available
    198. Re:Sounds familiar. by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      As someone who works in education (as a consultant to teachers), I can say that I have never met a teacher that wanted his or her students to be automatons.

      Occasionally you'll get a bad teacher that will try to crush the spirit out of a kid because they prize an orderly classroom more than individual thinking, but that's a tangential issue.

      All teachers are trained these days in Marzano's levels of thinking, and are taught to create lesson plans that teach kids critical thinking and higher level analysis, not just rote memorization and recitation.

      Your quotes form a pervasive meme on Slashdot, and one that I'd wish would fucking die.

    199. Re:Sounds familiar. by Skater · · Score: 1

      I feel your pain... I'm an aviation geek, and I'm waiting for the day I get shot for standing on the top floor of the BWI parking garage with my scanner listening to ATC while watching departures from RWY 15-R.

      Since you mentioned BWI - have you ever visited Gravelly Point? It's off the GW Parkway (northbound) just north of National Airport, fairly close to the north end of the main runway. The planes are either just a few seconds into the air or a few seconds from touching down when they pass overhead. It's pretty impressive that a place like that still exists. :)

    200. Re:Sounds familiar. by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      The point is not to avoid catering to genius, the point is to prohibit individual choice with regard to occupation. If any job can be done by any school graduate with adequate results, then there are no jobs which take advantage of an individual talent or inclination. The point is to turn the worker into a machine, a commodity that can be easily traded from corporation to corporation and then discarded as soon as it starts to break down. The point is to strip all semblance of individuality and self-reflection from the populace, to create an army of workers who need approval from their boss, deadlines and performance reviews, and the steady paycheck to feel complete. When we become the faceless masses, nobody gives a shit. We live our lives in the reflection of the rich and famous, the sports team, the political group. We no longer live for ourselves or our families because we no longer have our own dreams, our own desires, and these things have been methodically stripped from us since before the age of reason (which I consider to be about 7, sometimes as early as 5 if the parents aren't completely clueless).

      When people as a whole are predictable, dependable in their mediocrity, and easily led to a conclusion, then the economy blooms and corporate profits soar right alongside social problems and the steady degradation of human interaction.

      Our society is sick. It's a sick joke and we are its target.

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    201. Re:Sounds familiar. by Leebert · · Score: 1

      No, sir, I have not, but I've heard about it. I guess now since I work in the District right across the water, I should probably take some time one day to head over there and check it out. Heck, maybe I'll hop on the bike this weekend.

      What I *really* want to do is go see St. Maarten airport some time.

    202. Re:Sounds familiar. by T-Bucket · · Score: 1

      That is complete crap. The reg that states passengers shouldn't "congregate" near the flight deck door is in regards to in-flight. Sounds like another flight attendant who doesn't know what the hell she's doing. I am an airline pilot and I'm always happy to have passengers up by the cockpit (on the ground, obviously). If you ask, you can even get a picture in one of the seats if you wait 'till we're completely deplaned...

    203. Re:Sounds familiar. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Fuck Glenn Beck.

      Go read some history for yourself.

    204. Re:Sounds familiar. by Leebert · · Score: 1

      She had a bug up her butt, that's for sure. But I just didn't say anything and wandered back, because the alternative would be for my sarcastic self to rear his ugly head. :)

      BTW, cool on the pilot thing. I'm hoping maybe to start on my license this fall, if both schedule and money cooperate.

    205. Re:Sounds familiar. by northstarlarry · · Score: 1

      "I don't see how this big bang could ever have happened, isn't a repeating cycle more likely ?"

      These are not mutually exclusive. See: Cylic Model.

      "I wonder about climate, isn't it chaotic, are humans even capable of changing it ?"

      Also not mutally exclusive. No one is cogently arguing that human activity isn't one of the myriad inputs to the chaotic system called the climate. The question isn't if human activity affects it, it's the degree.

      "I wonder about this DNA code and mutations, after all, seeing the code, it doesn't look anywhere near random"

      That's because it's not random. In fact, the genetic code is one of the most efficient and intricate information compression and retrieval systems that we know about. Not even Richard Dawkins thinks a genome is random.

      "this God guy, he doesn't seem to be quite the same in all religions. I wonder what religions actually say about it"

      Christ on a pogo stick, have you never been outside your basement? There's an entire field called Comparative Religion!

      None of these statements is even remotely challenging, original, or contrary to "well-established scientific theories". Anyone who thinks that you're some kind of apostate speaking out against the scientific establishment is even more ignorant than you are, regardless of their political persuasions.

    206. Re:Sounds familiar. by Betaemacs · · Score: 1

      As the father of five, I completely disagree. My responsibility is not just to act as a paycheck, it is to do my best to make sure there is a decent world for my children to live in when they are out on their own. Sometimes that means interrupting the model suburbian lifestyle. It also has the benefit of teaching by example, a responsible adult doesn't always do what is convenient.

    207. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nazis != progressive. Rounding up gays and Jews isn't exactly progressive. They were right-wing. I don't care how many times talking heads repeat that lie.

      Also, Soviet Union == oligarchy. It was no more "the people" than DPRK is today.

    208. Re:Sounds familiar. by Meski · · Score: 1

      And it is working because it's a hell of a lot easier to win support when you are doing 'good' than it is when you are the person who advocates for personal freedom.

      The road to hell is paved with good intentions. (pick your own value of hell, even if you are as me, an atheist or agnostic)

    209. Re:Sounds familiar. by vaporland · · Score: 1

      "we don't need no education...." - pink floyd, the wall

      --
      Ask Me About... The 80's!
    210. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't know you could congregate on your own...

      There is a law in the UK where you can be arrested for standing still on the pavement. It is called 'loitering'

    211. Re:Sounds familiar. by FLaSh+SWT · · Score: 1

      This seems like a timely post: Banned for Life from the Miami-Dade Metrorail http://stretchphotography.com/blog/2010.07.01/banned-from-metro/

    212. Re:Sounds familiar. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      And that's relevant to whether one person can congregate how, exactly?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    213. Re:Sounds familiar. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      The section called Intellectual Espionage is a real eye opener. It's worth reading just to see what the average fifth grader was doing 100 years ago.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    214. Re:Sounds familiar. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I care a fair bit about liberty and stuff

      Bullshit

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    215. Re:Sounds familiar. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      if you have kids, the state owns you

      Close. They own the kids

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    216. Re:Sounds familiar. by Jorth · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying I would act any differently although I'm in the UK. But the future is our own fault if we don't stand up for the rights we do have.

    217. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't I fight you in Bioshock?

    218. Re:Sounds familiar. by Magada · · Score: 1

      No, not really. What Dewey is describing is the perfect bureaucrat or factory worker - a being solely driven by reason and motivated by money, while making allowance for the fact that individuals are different and thus should be conditioned differently to set them on their respective paths towards one and the same end state - that of a drone.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    219. Re:Sounds familiar. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      You realise that your mainly demonstrating my point by showing such blatant intolerance of these few example viewpoints.

      And they're not even really controversial viewpoints.

      The post did not, in fact, have anything to do with Christ, DNA or anything. It merely stated that democrats are intolerant of everything except a tiny, narrow and frankly boring view that they claim is scientific. In some cases, like say global warming, that claim is mostly right (though the intolerance of other viewpoints is not), in other cases, like basic economics or biology, they're beyond stupid (and generally very self-serving and hypocritical).

    220. Re:Sounds familiar. by dingram17 · · Score: 1

      LN2 bombs are fun. I only made a few of these with 600ml coke bottles when some cryogenic power electronics experiments were being performed. The fun stopped after we were busted setting them off by a technician. There was more commotion than we expected because the concrete pad (nice and level) we selected happened to be the loading bay of the dangerous goods store. Oops.

    221. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great! If I ever get to the US I'll make thousands of pictures of landmarks and vehicles and buildings and wear those nifty arabic outfits and see what happens.

    222. Re:Sounds familiar. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      Seriously you need to read up on history for yourself. Eugenics is a core tenant of progressive theory, never mind the propaganda generated for the benefit of the useful idiots. This list of names should get your started: Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, H. G. Wells, Woodrow Wilson, Theodore Roosevelt, Emile Zola,George Bernard Shaw, John Maynard Keynes, John Harvey Kellogg, Linus Pauling, Sidney Webb.

      If you think that progressivism is incompatible with oligarchy then I've got a bridge in New York that you might be interested in buying. What do you think that rule by a small group of enlightened elites is if not oligarchy?

    223. Re:Sounds familiar. by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Rat-onna-stick for me, followed by one of those pies made from the wobbly bits of ... assorted animals.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    224. Re:Sounds familiar. by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      What have we spent since? What have we "gained" in the war of terror? In terms of dollars to outcome; we have lost. Terribly.

      I generally agree, but on the other hand it's impossible to say for sure what would have happened if we hadn't spent all of that money and effort. Would there have been more attacks? Were there terrorists who would have attacked, but were intimidated by all the "security theater"? (after all, if security theater is primarily done for its psychological impact, then there's not reason to think it wouldn't affect the psychology of the 'bad guys' as well) We'll probably never know.

      Before 9/11 there was more visible security at airports than anywhere else. I had box cutters confiscated out of a tool kit at Logan before 9/11. The terrorists chose it BECAUSE it had high security. They made the point that they could strike and that there was no effective defense, which is still true.

      As for airplane safety, that scenario completely changed on 9/11. At the beginning of the day, people's reaction was to say "How inconvenient" and let events take their course. By the time of flight 93, they had learned they had to act and did so. The air is safe today as a result of a few brave people's actions, not because of the millions of wasted federal dollars.

    225. Re:Sounds familiar. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Is this the "gotcha" you refer to? If the government is stealing my money to pay for other people's healthcare (which they are), they better well be able to pass a law telling you what you have to eat. I'm all for letting people eat what they want, if I don't have to pay for the consequences of it.

      The gotcha was going to be that if she said it was unconstitutional, he would have followed up with a question regarding the healthcare bill.

      And just so I get your logic correct, you feel that because some government money has been applied to a topic, it gives the government the authority to regulate anything which may impact the amount of money the government must spend to offer the service at the same rate? I'm sorry, but that is a terrible way to make an end-run around the Constitution. Using that logic, the government may regulate anything by deciding it wants to regulate something. There are NO limits to governmental power under that premise.

      That's a really childish way to view the healthcare bill if you don't support it (considering your use of the term stealing). Are you really that vindictive that you would toss your beliefs to the curb just because you suffered a political loss in an effort to 'punish' everyone else?

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    226. Re:Sounds familiar. by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Yes, it seems the law is "audio recordings which embarrass law enforcement officers will be prosecuted". The law really needs to be changed.

    227. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But in reality, civil disobedience as well as whatever legal costs are incurred are in the best interests of your children as you're upholding your responsibility as a citizen of a supposedly democratic society by telling your government that you are not afraid of them. This will help provide your children with a freer life than you had, thus benefitting them.

    228. Re:Sounds familiar. by nege · · Score: 1

      Man, I think of that Asimov thing every day when I commute into the city. The tallest buildings in this large city were all built over 40 years ago. Some of them much older. We make small changes here and there, but never anything major for the sheer "we can do it" and for progress sake. Like those elevators in Asimov's story. There is an attitude of we *could* do it, but no one wants to bother. It is just not "cost effective".

    229. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Scratch below the surface a bit. The one common element is that the very wealthy top 5% who pull the strings are running the Liberal and Conservative parties. Another commonality is that their kids don't go to public schools. They look with suspicion upon the recently wealthy.

      The Conservative party DOES pander to the fundamentalists when it suits them, but you don't have to look very long at their behavior to see that they don't believe a word of the Christian philosophy (or at least don't try very hard to live it). The Liberals aim for a bit more basic fairness in society and a bit more of a safety net, but never without a million strings attached.

      Both sides look at a banking and finance industry that is so riddled with criminal fraud that one wonders if there would be anyone left if they were all fairly prosecuted and they throw a blatant token to the wolves and pretend the problem is solved. Both look at a legal system that has become a mockery of justice and do nothing.

    230. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      More to the point, they concluded that interchangeable standardized humans working in their factories would revolutionize society to their benefit.

      The objective was to make the population educated enough to be trainable but not enough that they might ask awkward questions like why don't the people who do all the work make a significant portion of the profits?

    231. Re:Sounds familiar. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that might make the world a better place for your children in the future, and bring great suffering to mine in the present: I would likely wind up broke, in jail (if not dead), and unable to feed, clothe, and shelter them, leaving them at the mercy of the very state I would be opposing.

      I would freely make that choice for myself (and others, like you and your kids, that might benefit), but I do not believe I can force the consequences upon my own non-adult progeny.

      Realize that I am very much a "kill the fucking cops trying to enter my home without a warrant" type of person and personally believe in the whole "die on one's feet instead of live on one's knees" thing, but sometimes it is better to regroup to fight from a position of greater strength, than it is to try to gain support by an act of defiance that will surely be distorted by the state's propaganda machine.

      At this point, I believe the most useful thing I can do is educate others about the consequences of civil disobedience so they can make informed decisions about whether to go ahead or wait.

      One of the most important things to understand is that it does not matter if you are right, legally. What matters is if you can either win the fight to prove that, or sacrifice everything you have to that it might be easier for others to do so in the future. And the first step is to understand exactly what you will be up against.

      Here's a glimpse: when you are in jail, what might take five minutes can take days or weeks. Bail set at $5k, and you have the money in the bank? No problem right? Just write a check, or get the funds certified, right?

      Not so fast. Do you really think your jailers will permit someone to bring you your checkbook, or power of attorney form to complete so you can bail yourself out? At best, you will have to have someone willing to front the money and believe that you can repay them. There are even ethical standards whether lawyers can lend money to their clients for this purpose (and we can clearly see why).

      Even communicating with your attorney is difficult. Why should he or she talk to you if you can't pay them because you can't talk to them to get you the necessary paperwork so you can pay them? Incarceration is a series of catch-22s. You get one phone call. It better be a good one, and you better have an attorney that will take the ball and run with it trusting he or she will get paid somehow. Do you really think a public defender will help you contact your "real" lawyer?

      Listen, bucko, it can take hours, or days, to even get something as simple as a pencil, or a styrofoam cup to drink from: when I was jailed, I was issued a standard inmate package: clothes, towel, blanket, orientation handbook, and a pencil. My cup was missing. It took two days to learn when I was permitted to ask for a replacement. Until then, I drank from a faucet by cupping my hands.

      None of these things are real hardships, of course, but when you are responsible for others, the time things can take works against you: every day you are jailed is another day you are more likely to lose your job.

      Have lots of money and lawyers on retainer? Good luck if the state seizes it -- standard practice in drug cases is to seize three times one's networth (as illogical as that sounds), UNTIL you can prove your innocence (you can be held on probable cause for a reasonable length of time, and "reasonable" is a fucking huge loophole). What kinda lawyer are you going to hire now?

      The only currency you have on the "outside", is your IOU, which is worthless if you can't win and pay up. Who believes in you, huh?

      Now, if you want to make a stand, and fight your cause, jail is not a place from which you can be effective unless you become a martyr with lots of support. Mandella pulled it off. Can you? So, do you chose to resist arrest with force. Got the stomach to kill a cop on principle? Willing to die for the cause? Do you think such actions will do your cause more harm than good?

      By all means, stand up for your rights all you want. But realize what you are in for. Sometimes the more effective path is to plan, wait, and seize opportunity when you can.

    232. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      That and connect your camera to wireless so by the time the cops can demand the flash card it's already uploaded to somewhere (along with your conversation with the police).

    233. Re:Sounds familiar. by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 1

      The objective was to make the population educated enough to be trainable but not enough that they might ask awkward questions like, "Why I don't I open up my own shop and make these products for half the cost since I have an idea that would make the same product twice as effective?"

      Fixed to remove extraneous Marxism.

    234. Re:Sounds familiar. by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Today's attitude is "if it could be slightly dangerous, it shouldn't be allowed, and if a minor is doing it, punish the parent."

      So true. I've bought a microscope for my son. The slides were made of ... plexiglass. Probably to protect from cut wounds if they break. Who cares that they get scratched within a day.

      I did not use signature in my posts during last 10+ years, but now I'm thinking about starting again:

      I'm not afraid of terrorists!

    235. Re:Sounds familiar. by northstarlarry · · Score: 1

      You realise that your mainly demonstrating my point by showing such blatant intolerance of these few example viewpoints. And they're not even really controversial viewpoints.

      As I said, they are so far from being controversial that they don't even represent a departure from the consensus in their respective fields. The only things that I'm intolerant of are your presentation of them as somehow radical, and your unrelated, unsubstantiated, and frankly bigoted claim that members of a specific political group would attack you for making them.

    236. Re:Sounds familiar. by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      Is intolerance of other viewpoints always wrong? I can't see how saying "yes, in your viewpoint 2+2 = 369" and "That's OK, you're entitled to your viewpoint."

      I mean, sure, have a viewpoint, but the above example, the viewpoint is flat out *wrong*. And I don't see how being tolerant of that is helpful or itself better than just saying "That is incorrect, 2+2 does not equal 369 but 2+2=4."

      Also, why would challenging viewpoints you disagree with be intolerant? Just screaming at each other is not terribly useful, but is debate wrong?

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    237. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Goddard would probably have been stopped before he could get started these days.

    238. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      The point is that at one time you didn't need to get special permission from the government to take the next natural step from small model rockets.

      It's also notable that the BATF tried it's best to make the motors illegal (even though they are neither alcohol, tobacco, nor firearms), they just failed.

      There are many things where you need to know what you are doing to avoid killing yourself and others. This includes changing a tire, hooking up your new water heater, mowing the lawn, filling your tank, etc.

    239. Re:Sounds familiar. by lusiphur69 · · Score: 1

      Citation needed.

      Many other countries espouse a meritocracy, though fall short. Americans just look on the achievements of their forebears and assume they are top dogs.

      Its pretty sad when over half of your populace can't name their President.

    240. Re:Sounds familiar. by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 1

      Actually, he was forced to move his work out to the NM desert because of opposition from his neighbors in MA.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    241. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      Actually, he had more trouble with curious gawkers than anything else, and certainly didn't get arrested and charged. He moved to NM after getting significant funding since he would be scaling up and didn't wish to endanger others.

    242. Re:Sounds familiar. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I'm not tossing anything to the curb. I'm simply trying to have the government MINIMIZE the amount of my tax money it takes/spends on other people. Since the government chose to do that (passed the healthcare bill), then it should now take other means to minimize the amount it spends.

    243. Re:Sounds familiar. by sjames · · Score: 1

      My initial comment wasn't really all that Marxist.

      The element of class warfare really suggests itself in the situation and requires no resort to Marx. What else would you call a deliberately defective education for the masses to keep them from grabbing their own share of the wealth?

    244. Re:Sounds familiar. by Transaction7 · · Score: 1

      The terrorists have indeed had a great victory out of 9/11, the shoe bomber, and other such things, primarily because both of our political parties and just about all of our politicians and Homeland Security types have let them in order to be seen by other fools as doing something. Now the professionals have done some good intelligence work , headed off some attacks, and caught the perpetrators of some of the others. They didn’t do it by having a bunch of hacks make us all take off our shoes, putting a U. S. Senator and a six year old kid on the no-fly list, and the like. Hey, security absurdity, or theater, is nothing new. When I was a child, living within walking distance of the Atlantic Ocean, in downtown Washington, D.C., and in east Texas not far from the big oil field, during World War II, we had to have black plastic covers over the top half of our headlights to prevent the Germans from following them to the oil fields, but you could see the natural gas being flared off, blazing high into the sky, and above the clouds [which my Dad told us the day would come when we wished we had that gas] a hundred miles from the actual wells and just about to the coast. Lindberg navigated and flew across the Atlantic to Paris with less in the way of navigation aids than available even before radar, loran, and GPS. In my older public school days, we had asinine drills for atomic bomb blasts with instructions that wouldn’t have had any real effect. I suspect they had similar public relations gimmicks thousands of years before Homeland Security told us all to stock up on Duct Tape. It took me over twenty years before the CIA admitted to me, in writing, that they had put me on a list of suspected Soviet spies or sympathizers in college, and lied to my U. S. Senator and me about that, based on nothing but open research for a thesis is international economics and the Russians having sent me something that we already had in the college library, although any number of people from the college, the Department of State which had declassified bales of documents for that research paper, top management of American companies in Argentina, etc. could have confirmed that I was an active conservative Republican and most certainly no Communist or Communist sympathizer. Of course the funny part of this was that their Top Secret mail cover and blacklist were done in such a way that I knew about it all along and they still lied to my Senators and me about it for years, through administrations of both parties.

    245. Re:Sounds familiar. by mlush · · Score: 1

      I'm not saying I would act any differently although I'm in the UK. But the future is our own fault if we don't stand up for the rights we do have.

      I think the key point is that sentence is 'we'. Individuals getting busted for a causing 'a breach of the peace' and the like will achieve little more than saber rattling in the blogosphere and perhaps an if there well known something in a real newspaper.

      If your want to achieve a regular google search on photographyt protest (and attending) better bet. I like the idea of getting together in large numbers and photographing 'forbidden' stuff.

    246. Re:Sounds familiar. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      Fuck Glenn Beck.

      Thanks, not I am going to have nightmares for months.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    247. Re:Sounds familiar. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Going to jail isn't going to help your kids, and it isn't going to change society. This society is already broken beyond repair.

    248. Re:Sounds familiar. by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Even a statement like "2+2 = 369" could be used to point out to people that numbers are basically convention and have nothing to do with the underlying mathematics. They're often used notation, nothing else. Algebra students here are asked to calculate for half an hour or so with an alternative successor function.

      And that's ignoring that basic addition of natural numbers is known to be mathematically wrong (there's a paradox in this theory, ergo it's wrong), so in all honesty one day someone will make a claim like 2+2=555 or something and will be more correct than the consensus view.

      And this is in theoretical mathematics. These days open contradictions are apparently allowed in many sciences. Take climate science, the truth is that climate is chaotic XOR AGW is correct. But everyone, even a university climate researcher I talked to, claims both of these despite know full well that that's impossible (he did say that his own opinion didn't really matter and that not acknowledging AGW was suicide, and so this problem is off-limits).

      Just about any theory has what you might call existential problems. In physics : both relativity and the standard model disagree with observed reality. Frankly, we have nothing else. In Biology : let's not pretend biology is anything more than a very loose collection but there's also a number of problems. For example evolution theory depends on random copying and mutations of genes, however the process of conception is not random at all, and has extremely thorough error correction. It even builds something akin to database indexes for quicker searching between a few types of genes. Looking at the program actually contained in genes, it looks anything but being formed by mutations. The new theory being that viruses form a sort of DNA library that's being exchanged and re-used between different species. Economics : the mathematical foundations of rational choice theory are defective, to say the least. And of course, humans are not rational (a result from AI and psychology. Humans imitate one another. Rationality is a trick we learned some 2500 or-so years ago, and is as much part of our brain as "SIT !" is part of a dog's brain. AI expanded upon this by demonstrating that no real-world animal or computer, no matter how complicated, is in fact capable of being rational)

      Science could use a lot of criticism, and can certainly use lots and lots of weird ideas. Because the ideas we have are known to be flawed. So by all means, bring in a few new ones a few controversial ones.

    249. Re:Sounds familiar. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Not quite.

      Modern music (i.e., last 10-20 years) is crap. I've been to several classic rock and metal concerts lately, with bands that came out in the late 60s, 70s, or early 80s, and these concerts were packed, not just with older people, but people my age (mid-30s), people in their 20s, and even teenagers.

      I frequently see kids running around with Iron Maiden t-shirts on. That's a band that came out around 1980, well before these kids were born. When I was a kid, I was NOT listening to music from the 50s.

      I attribute it to Guitar Hero. Like it or hate it, it's brought guitar rock back into popularity with many, even though the music industry would rather push the latest Justin Timberlake or Lady Gaga crap onto everyone.

      While I doubt it's a majority, there's a LOT of kids these days who prefer the music their parents listened to rather than the latest Billboard junk. I've even heard this from many middle-aged fathers at work, talking about their own kids. It's truly an interesting phenomenon, one that I did not see at all when I was young.

    250. Re:Sounds familiar. by jerry-VA · · Score: 0

      This kid went to Stockholm, Sweden, to remember playing with rockets:

      By the time Watson and Crick were being honored here in Stockholm in 1962, I had been designing rockets with my adolescent companions for three years. For fuel, we discovered that a mixture of potassium nitrate and sugar could be very carefully melted over a charcoal stove and poured into a metal tube in a particular way with remarkable results. The tube grew larger with our successive experiments until it was about four feet long. My mother grew more cautious and often her head would appear out of an upstairs window and she would say things that were not encouraging. The sugar was reluctantly furnished from her own kitchen, and the potassium nitrate we purchased from the local druggist.
      Back then in South Carolina young boys seeking chemicals were not immediately suspect. We could even buy dynamite fuse from the hardware with no questions asked. This was good, because we were spared from early extinction on one occasion when our rocket exploded on the launch pad, by the very reliable, slowly burning dynamite fuses we could employ, coupled with our ability to run like the wind once the fuse had been lit. Our fuses were in fact much improved over those which Alfred Nobel must have used when he was frightening his own mother. In one of our last experiments before we became so interested in the maturing young women around us that we would not think deeply about rocket fuels for another ten years, we blasted a frog a mile into the air and got him back alive. In another, we inadvertently frightened an airline pilot, who was preparing to land a DC-3 at Columbia airport. Our mistake. --Kary B. Mullis, Nobel Lecture, Dec. 1993
      http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/chemistry/laureates/1993/mullis-lecture.html

      --
      Many are destined 2reason wrongly; others, not 2reason at all; and others, to persecute those who do reason. Voltaire
  2. Just noisy by Titan1080 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We used to have a lot of fun with these in high school. We would put them under the bleachers during high school football games. Harmless fun... Mostly...

    1. Re:Just noisy by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

      We used to throw them in my friends in-ground pool, high concrete walls all around the outside of the pool area made it sound much louder to the people inside the house at the time.

    2. Re:Just noisy by EvanED · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can do it harmlessly, but by point of contrast, a couple kids in my high school did that, and actually hurt a teacher who got hit by shrapnel.

    3. Re:Just noisy by nobodyman · · Score: 1

      It's far from harmless fun. You could be seriously injured or killed with one of these things. This kid got off lucky. That said, I think this story hinges on the details (and the article provides few). If the kid was trying to harm others then the police should have gotten involved, but if he was just setting them off in the back yard then it's a different story.

      Does anybody remember Air Jammer's? Basically it a car that used compressed air to power a little engine (similar to a steam-powered engine, but with no steam). Anyway, I replaced the air tank with coca-cola bottle, ran the air tube through a small hole in the lid, and filled it w/ dry ice and a little water. It worked better than I could have imagined... until I got overzealous with the dry ice/water amounts.

      Sometimes I think I would hate to be a kid growing up today. Technology is much more advanced than 30 years ago but kids have far less freedom. Even walking around and exploring is something we as a society think kids shouldn't be allowed to do.

    4. Re:Just noisy by bzzzap · · Score: 1

      We put them in mailboxes in high school. They're fun, but way too unpredictable to be called "harmless". ("Just give it one shake before you close the door!" *shake* *BOOM*)

    5. Re:Just noisy by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      We used to take shotgun shells, take out the shot, tape a large marble or ball bearing to the primer... maybe add some fins near the back or some corn starch where the shot used to be. Throw those suckers all over.... 2 day suspension from jr high. now days i suspect my mom would be in Guantanamo.

    6. Re:Just noisy by noidentity · · Score: 1

      What keeps happening to the word "of" in the phrase "couple of"? Constantly I see this word left out. Did I miss the memo?

    7. Re:Just noisy by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      Sacrifices must be made for the furthering of SCIENCE!

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    8. Re:Just noisy by Nemesisghost · · Score: 1

      I had a physics teacher doing a demonstration for a Physical Science(beginner Chem & Physics) class where he'd 1/2 fill a coke bottle with Liquid Nitrogen, put the cap on, and before it exploded, put it under an industrial trash can so that nobody would get hurt by shrapnel. One day he took too long before he capped it off & put it under the trash can, so when it exploded it did so like a rocket. The top of the soda bottle broke through the bottom of the trash can. Needless to say, it was a clear warning that it's not just harmless fun.

    9. Re:Just noisy by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 1

      My mother is still hanging on to (yeah, she's a pack rat) most of the toys I grew up with. I noticed the Air Jammers my brother and I had growing up on one of my more recent visits. I may need give them a bit more power...lol. My college summer job was working in an ice house. We made the cube and some block ice, but only resold dry ice. Occasionally we'd make the dry ice bombs with two liter bottles and they'd make a really big noise and we'd find small fragments of the bottle/cap. Definitely something dangerous if you don't take precautions. The kid in the video you linked is definitely lucky. Given the distance I've seen fragments fly, he could have easily had them blind him. I'm not sure it would kill him, but it could permanently injure him.

    10. Re:Just noisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Local dialect in and around western PA. Right or wrong, it is very common. I'm sure it is common in other areas as well.

      The wikipedia article references Central PA but it is western as well.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_Pennsylvania_accent

    11. Re:Just noisy by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      And my gym teacher took a softball to the groin. To protect his future children nothing less than a ban on all projectiles is acceptable!

    12. Re:Just noisy by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      Similarly, I had a chemistry teacher that would light inverted beakers of hydrogen gas. One (probably damaged beforehand) shattered during the demonstration, showering everyone within 12 feet in glass shards.

      After that, he used test tubes, and inspected them first.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    13. Re:Just noisy by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      My first experience with dry ice was during junior high when I was in a summer theater program. We were taking part in a special effects seminar, which happened to be given by the city's fire marshall (he's a big theater nut and runs his own special effects company). We had a bunch of dry ice we were using to create fog on the stage, and I asked him if I could have a little piece to put in a 32oz Gatorade bottle. He smiled at me and said take all you want.

      I put it in the bottle, shook it up, set it down on the street behind the theater and ran to a safe cover. I watched for about 30 seconds while the bottle expanded but to my surprise it didn't explode. As I was walking back over by the bottle to check it out, I heard the boom and the bottle disappeared before my eyes! About 30 seconds later the bottle landed on the other side of the street. The normally concave bottom of the Gatorade bottle was completely gone! Those were good times.

    14. Re:Just noisy by EvanED · · Score: 1

      The other poster is exactly right; I grew up in central PA.

      I actually just got done writing a paper and my advisor kept marking "a couple " phrases in it. I actually made an emacs minor mode (based on hi-lock) that highlights a couple of idioms (and Latex mistakes) I need to avoid, and "a couple" followed by something other than "of" was one of them. :-)

    15. Re:Just noisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my high school electronics class, my teacher dropped a 13 inch CRT from 12 feet up to show us that it would implode from the vaccuum. Boy was he wrong. I was the only one that did not get hit with glass because I was the only one that ducked behind the cabinet. My parents owned an electronic business and I was fully aware of the right way and wrong way to diffuse a CRT electrically and mechanically.

      Looking back, I don't think anyone learned anything of value in there but taking an electronics class filled a need for semi geeks that still wanted a "shop" class. We still smoked dope and destroyed things just like the people in the real shop classes did so it was cool.

    16. Re:Just noisy by EvanED · · Score: 1

      I didn't post that to say "go police for arresting this kid in this case" (I think authorities are extremely quick to overreact in general), just to point out that dry ice bombs can easily actually do damage.

    17. Re:Just noisy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you see somebody setting down a bottle and then giving it distance while watching, going over and picking it up as if were typical trash isn't the best idea. A friend and I used to do this back in the early 1990's, and stopped one or two ignorant folks from becoming an unexpected participant in our experiments. (This was before people were "OMG!" stupid-paranoid about these kind of things. Although you could get the cops looking around on a public disturbance call.)

      Usually if there's nothing more than the bottle, water, and dry ice - the "danger radius" for anything other than potential hearing loss is about 6ft (2m). The plastic just doesn't weigh enough to carry any momentum vs. air resistance. The typical outdoor steel drum garbage cans also seemed to be an effective barrier from any bottle shrapnel as well, which allowed for other opportunities for mischief with no real physical harm... We also found a calculated water temperature and water dry-ice ratio that gave a fairly consistent 5min delay. But I won't go into the details on that. :p

      Other more risky experiments involved having a thick walled pipe that the bottle would fit inside, and then burying one end under a few feet of dirt. Made for an interesting makeshift mortar... Never did know where those tennis balls went. (Past the "Holy shit! Look at it go!" part that is.)

      If anybody tried that kind of stuff these days, there's likely to be a dozen squads called in to do a neighborhood sweep or something.

  3. Throw out your fire extinguishers. by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    The cops are onto them.

  4. Pfft, I can top that. by Becausegodhasmademe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I reckon about 90% of all Slashdotters made/did way more dangerous things when they were younger. I certainly did and I look forward to doing them with my kids too! It's like a ritual part of childhood in my family!

    1. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by singingjim1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      potato and tennis ball guns made from tennis ball cans (they used to be metal) and duct tape, and using lighter fluid to launch projectiles and friggin long way. We were 12!

    2. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by somaTh · · Score: 1

      On a similar line to the dry ice - The Works (TM) and aluminum foil.

      Is it illegal to make/possess thermite at home? I mean, it's not an explosive, even by this cop's definition.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    3. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had a friend whose parents had an acetylene torch, and we would fill balloons full of a mixture of acetylene and pure oxygen and set them off with fuses of nothing more than newspaper. We accidentally (yes, accidentally) set off like three of them at once and the concussion wave broke an empty fish tank that was nearby (and we could barely hear anything for hours... it'll probably give me tinnitus when I'm older...).

      It was awesome, but then my friend lived in the middle of nowhere surrounded by nothing but trees for acres.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    4. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Comen · · Score: 1

      I got kicked out of 11th grade for the year, and had to go to a "excluded student school" for that year cause I made a device that would shock people out of a camera flash. it was total BS.

    5. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by nopainogain · · Score: 1

      i introduced the basic elements of gunpowder and increased fuel power to my friends potato cannon back in the late 80s by using ground up activated filter carbon, WD40, and aerosol hairspray (when that was still around). Made the cannon much more potent, loud, and heated the outside of it up a lot. yes, late 80s, i AM that old

    6. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by tibit · · Score: 1

      Back in elementary school in eastern Europe (before fall of the Wall), I used a re-purposed inverter from a hiking fluorescent light. We'd hook it up to door handles and get people zapped. Hothing harmful, just unpleasant. Then in high school we had lots of fun with portable lasers -- I had a tiny He-Ne laser pointer that'd eat up 9V batteries like crazy, and a laser pointer or two. Some girls got really scared upon seeing a bright red dot on their shoulder ;) We were pretty careful not to shine into anyone's eye, mindful of reflective things, etc.

      No one ever got into any trouble for that, but even had we got in trouble it would be maybe a note sent to parents. Getting kicked out from school for a year for a kid's prank -- WTF? And your parents' taxes paid for that? I feel sorry, all I can say.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by xaxa · · Score: 1

      My story:
      I was about 21, helping my dad in the next-door neighbour's garden (we're English). She has a very large garden.

      Suddenly, we hear an almighty "BOOM!". Did it come from the road? I run towards the road, via the house so I can grab the phone and call 999... The explosion didn't come from the road, but from the kitchen. My brother, about 15, is sitting, shaking at the table. There is a 15cm hole in the ceiling, and broken shards of glass and plastic everywhere. The floor is also wet.

      A few years earlier I'd shown my brother how to electrolyse water and collect the hydrogen and oxygen into two test tubes. He'd presumably also done this at school, and knew that the gas burned best if it was in the correct ratio. He decided to fill a large (0.5L?) plastic beaker with the gas mix. When it was full he'd touched the two wires together to make a spark. Luckily, the beaker had launched itself up and shattered into the ceiling, rather than exploding on the table.

      I suspect his hearing has suffered slightly, although mine has from too much music, so I can't really tell.

    8. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by captainpanic · · Score: 1

      I reckon about 90% of all Slashdotters made/did way more dangerous things when they were younger. I certainly did and I look forward to doing them with my kids too! It's like a ritual part of childhood in my family!

      I call it self-education... and it's what kids do.

      You start off several months old, barely able to hold stuff in your hands, banging your toy, your bottle or just yourself against whatever you can bang it against. [discovery of muscle power and first impressions of force]
      Then at the age of 1 kids start dropping everything they can - to see if that particular object also falls to the ground like it seems everything else does. [discovery of gravity]

      Then, you proceed through stages where you destroy your own toys, the garden of your parents, countless household objects. [discovery of force, pressure, and material sciences]
      You hurt yourself thousands of times and you shed countless tears. [discovery of basic medicine]

      Then you get to an age that destruction is still fascinating, but you found that there exist objects which you cannot destroy easily.
      Natural curiosity which you have applied successfully until then will make most kids devise ways to continue the destruction. [discovery of science in general]

      And those who are the best at this type of learning we call "Engineers and scientists"... and they are the ones that are making a living from it. They are also the ones that are likely to continue this destruction the longest.

      I for one, continued playing with dangerous stuff until... damn, I actually haven't stopped yet.
      *looks around to see if the police are here already*

      p.s. yes, I know there is a line to be drawn somewhere. There are a few people (much less than 1 in a million) who blow up much bigger things. Those are the real terrorists. But honestly, all those people you can count on 1 hand in the entire western world. And most did it out of pure hatred against society, or stupid religious ideas. Not for fun, like kids do.
      But 14 year old kids who destroy stuff just lack the motive, the ambition, to really hurt society. They just want to destroy stuff, to see if they can do it.

    9. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      For chemistry open days at school, we used to run a series of demos. One of the things I would do was chill a boiling tube and put a tiny bit of dry ice in the bottom. I'd then put the cork on and give it to someone in the audience to hold, telling them to keep it held straight and that I'd need it for a demo a bit later. Typically, about a minute later there's be a very loud bang as the heat from their hand caused the carbon dioxide to expand enough to force the bung out at high speed. It sometimes ricochetted and hit one of the other people in the audience.

      We also discovered that dipping your hand in ether and lighting it kept the flames far enough away from you that it didn't hurt (due to the fact that it's only the gas that's burning, and it's only burning when it is diluted enough that it can get a lot of air), at least for ten seconds or so. We'd hold a lighter in one hand, reach out to shake hands with the parents of prospective pupils, and light the outstretched hand as it went past. After they jumped back, we'd apologise, saying something like 'that keeps happening today - we're not sure why.'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by iknowcss · · Score: 1

      *takes notes furiously*

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    11. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      In high school some friends and I would typically make a movie each summer. One summer we were making a fake Japanese terrorist movie where we would just randomly move our lips then come in later and dub in the script in English. In one scene we wanted to blow up a gov't building, so we took a 3D puzzle of the capital building and put a foil + liquid plumber mixture in a glass bottle and put the puzzle on top of it (not one of our brighest ideas). We hoped the pressure would shatter the puzzle from the inside out.. and yes, we were purposely doing cheesy effects.

      All we got was a lot of smoke, but it was probably for the better since glass shards flying around would not have been good.

      After that failure we decided to use one of the SimCity games and built a town up, then had the main villian menacingly click the 'demolish' button.

      We also strapped bottle rockets to GI Joe toys and launched them in the middle of the neighborhood. Also had the cops show up twice while making movies to check out our fake guns, but they never did anything other than look at the gun to make sure it wasn't real.

      Sadly this was the mid 90s... so much has changed in 15 years.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    12. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Comen · · Score: 1

      Yea my parents were pissed, whats even more screwed up about it is, that I had 2 weeks or so in school waiting for a school hearing to determine my punishment, during that time I saw the principle showign the device off to other people several times.
      During the hearing the principle, while sitting up in the stand, shocked his ball point pen that was part metal and when sparks flew he jumped from his seat in a total acting job, since I knew he had been playing with the dame thing as much as I was. If I ever see that guy I am punching him in his face!

    13. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I made Nitro Glycerine in my dad's garage. all from stuff I bought at the local pharmacy and pool supply. I was too chicken to refine it down to explode on shock, but a mason jar full of of it on a small campfire give you 5 minutes to run and hide before it explodes. It created a 6 foot crater and shattered a tree. You did not hear the explosion, you hear a POP,Rinnnnnnnnnng! and felt the shockwave.

      Bad ideas are finding ways to burn pool chlorine tablets... the smoke from that will burn the leaves off the trees....

      Now sparklers for kids.... crush them, pack the contents into a plastic pill bottle, and add a fuse. the explosion is not violent but insanely loud. Sounded the same and had a shockwave as well. Sparklers are dangerous!

      Most fun is having access to helium, and aceletyne torches. Fill 2 balloons with helium, and 1 balloon with acelytene and oxygen. tie together and add a fuse to the explosive one. light and let go.

      The balloons explode about 30 to 60 feet off the ground with an insane BOOM that rings through the neighborhood. It was fun to fill small ziplocks like that and throw them under the benches of the welders at the shop I worked at. It was fun to be 18 and a maintainance guy at a foundry... you learn fun pranks.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    14. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. When I was going to highschool on the Oregon coast, we'd go to the beach and build huge bonfires (think logs that were anywhere from 6 inches to a foot thick). Once the center of the fire had built up some nice, red coals, we'd have someone toss an aerosol can in while the rest of us took cover behind a large driftwood log or a trench that we had dug out. The person doing the tossing had to run like hell to take cover before the explosion. Usually we were rewarded with a huge fireball and smoke of various colors depending on what we threw in (paint, WD-40, whatever we could find in our parents garages). We also tried a few mini-propane tanks. Those didn't fireball; they just blew our bonfire to smithereens and coated the beach in burning embers in a 100ft radius. As far as shrapnel goes, usually the bottom would blow off of the aerosol cans, and the propane tanks would split in half.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    15. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      We also did this when I was in High School/Jr. High. Fun stuff, providing you didn't stick it in a mailbox and land a felony conviction. The kids who lived on farms had the real fun though.

      Last year a couple kids at the local college made a few works bombs. The bomb squad was immediately called in and the accused were expelled the same day.

      One is facing a felony conviction. Being black and on a scholarship, his life is virtually over. They'll send him to prison, he'll serve a short stint because he really didn't do anything wrong, get out on parole and stay on probation for 7 or 8 years because the state enjoys getting their $70 a month. If he is lucky he will work a menial job for the rest of his miserable life because defending or complaining about our treatment of felons is equated to giving child molesters bags of lollipops and driving them to the city park.

      Even if I get ripped apart by wild dogs I can't help but hope we all get whats coming to us.

    16. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha, I used to light my hand on fire in high school. Got a lot of crazy looks, but was fairly safe for a short period of time. I would just use rubbing alcohol and pour on my hand and light it. Since the flame is blue, this is best done in a dark room for best effect.

    17. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by modecx · · Score: 1

      Used to do something similar with hydrogen, oxygen and balloons--then eventually a 50 gallon trash bag or two...

      It's impressive what a near stoichiometric ratio of hydrogen and oxygen can do.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    18. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Bagok · · Score: 1

      Ah, the Junior Engineering and Technical Society magic show my senior year in high school, circa 1979. The finally was an oxy/acetylene filled beach ball slid down a wire onto a bunson burner. Well, would have been. We attempted it during rehearsal with a way too much mixture and ended up blowing a hole in the stage, knocking lights askew all over the building and an impromptu fire drill. Biggest explosion I've ever felt. No one was arrested or even fired. The act was, however, pulled from the show's lineup.

      --
      I'm not sure about faith moving mountains, but I've seen what it can do to skyscrapers.
    19. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was 9 or 10, we had a family friend come back from Vietnam that taught me how to create a tennis ball cannon: With 4 beer cans (steel at the time, with a uniform diameter top to bottom), you'd punch out the tops and bottoms of 3 cans, leaving the 4th as is. Duct tape them together with the intact beer can at the bottom. Punch a small ignition hole into the fourth can, drop a tennis ball into the top, put no more than 4 or 5 drops of lighter fluid into the hole and shake vigorously for fumes to form, then light it- You'd get at least a 100 yard shot. My dad supervised the manufacture of the cannon and the first two shots, but after that me and my friends were on our own. We had enough sense not to look down the barrel or catch ourselves on fire. No way we could get away with that today.

    20. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by demonbug · · Score: 1

      My freshmen year of college my chemistry prof did this on one of the first days, except he used hydrogen + oxygen + extremely large balloon. That knocked more than a few ceiling tiles down, and brought every other professor in the building over to see what had happened.

      He did tell us to cover our ears and open our mouths before he set it off (and opened the windows). That was a fun class (but yeah, a little immature for college-level; I think he just did it for fun).

    21. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

      That is exactly what we made. Good times.

    22. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      My friends and I made pipe bombs. Finely powdered oxidising agents, carbon, sulphur. Annoyingly, at the time, none of us knew how to make thermite, but we *were* researching nitrogen triiodide. I was 14 at the time, and playing with home-made explosives seemed much more rewarding (and safer) than going to gym classes.

    23. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

      You're (ahem) young. We were making the tennis ball cannons in the mid-70s and our older brothers before us (who showed us how to do it) in the 60s.

    24. Re:Pfft, I can top that. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      That's like what we used to do in the high school locker rooms in Ireland. We'd spray a thick coat of Lynx/Axe body spray on our hands and light it up. It'd give off a blue flame, but some of the lads would let it go a little too long and the heat would start getting into their hands. I don't know what was louder, them screaming as they shook their hands or us laughing at them!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
  5. Home Chemistry has been dead for a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Of course, this is actually part of my hometown's attempt to make it completely undesirable to live here.

    I've heard that next week they will start cracking down on rubber band "guns", too...

  6. Wow! by EllisDees · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is popping balloons also illegal in this neighborhood?

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    1. Re:Wow! by Trisha-Beth · · Score: 1

      Sure. Bubblewrap too.

    2. Re:Wow! by jgagnon · · Score: 1

      Only if they contain gas or liquid... :p

      --
      Remember to maintain your supply of /facepalm oil to prevent chafing.
    3. Re:Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty hard to pop a balloon with a solid in it.

  7. Education is dangerous by grimsnaggle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Society needs to figure out that it can't have it both ways. You can't desire educated kids without giving them the freedom to explore, particularly so long as the damage they do is limited to their own lives and property. Alpha double plusses require a large bottle, right?

    1. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that it is part of the plan to dumb down America. I know that there isn't a lot of smarts left to beat out of the curious types, but there clearly is a workable plan in place to do just that.

      On the plus side, we will be saving huge amounts of $$$ that we currently spend on education.

    2. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well you are correct, we don't want to educate kids today. We apparently want them to take Ritalin, shut up, take no responsibility in raising them and then teach them to be creationists. Because thinking outside what the bible says is bad. Seriously do you really want a bunch of kids running around thinking, do you? do you?

    3. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more?

    4. Re:Education is dangerous by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Apparently you haven't read the 5th Harry Potter book. Umbridge believed that the theory was enough for anyone, while the actual practice could lead to dangerous desires amongst the kids of Hogwarts. She pushed the idea that, with proper study of the theory, you can do spells perfectly if and when you desire.

      Of course, half the kids in the school revolted against her, and started their own group where they learned on their own.

    5. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think "society" now consists of our corporate-owned asses cowering and being quiet as anyone who stands out in any way gets arrested. The decision has been made. Corporate America does not desire educated people of any sort, and freedom is something to be crushed.

    6. Re:Education is dangerous by Nugoo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, I don't think they desire educated kids.

      --
      I explicitly release the above into the public domain.
    7. Re:Education is dangerous by Xugumad · · Score: 1

      So the problem is that these are dangerous, and dangerous enough to injure innocent bystanders, and given the response from Slashdot apparently that danger is extremely opaque to most people. You pretty much can't buy dry ice as a child (unsure if it's illegal, or just nowhere will do it, but probably illegal), and there's a damn good reason for that. Talking of opaque risks, how many people are aware that there's an asphyxiation risk with dry ice? Any of you actually read the safety sheet for dry ice?

      This is pretty much ideal stuff for letting someone who knows what they're doing, show you the results of. Mythbusters is probably ideal watching here...

    8. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think these people desire educated kids? Educated kids grow into educated adults, and educated adults are nothing but trouble.

    9. Re:Education is dangerous by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      You can buy dry ice at the grocery store. "These are dangerous" in a very ordinary and pedestrian way. There is no public health risk from blowing up a 2 liter bottle with CO2. It is loud as hell, and if you were completely and utterly reckless you could conceivably get yourself a minor injury. Heck, if you stuck it up your bum you might get a major injury. But really, have you guys all lost your minds? This is in the class of jumping your bike over a ditch, not in the criminal class.

      In the pantheon of "shit that makes a really, really loud noise", a CO2 bomb is just about as safe as you can get. And as long as you aren't harming anyone else, you should be left alone. The worst that should have come from this case is an order to cease disturbing the peace.

    10. Re:Education is dangerous by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      "how many people are aware that there's an asphyxiation risk with dry ice?"

      You've got to be kidding me. Sure, if you put this stuff in a cooler and then jam your face into it then yeah, you might have a problem. I could put 20 pounds of this stuff on my floor, open a window and be perfectly fine.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    11. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California, and probably other states, doing this is "manufacture of an infernal device", and is a felony.

      The biggest dangers, other than obvious stupidity, is that it does not go off as planned, or goes off prematurely. They are notorious for being unpredictable, and arguably, letting children play with making them while unsupervised is child endangerment. I am all for adult supervision, in theory, though.

      However, if one disagrees with the law, and does not want to find one's self facing a judge, one should lobby to change it.

      A real practical problem is what to do with one that does not go off? One can not leave it, nor can one approach it. Firing at it with a sufficiently penetrating bullet is the obvious solution, but that carries it's own set of problems, not the least of which are ordinances against discharge of firearms within city limits. (/me thinks of a bow and arrow, actually.)

      These are quite dangerous, given the energy that a compressed gas can have. While amusing for responsible and knowledgeable adults, they are certainly not toys, and nothing I'd let my kids make unsupervised.

    12. Re:Education is dangerous by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew of a guy (and was present during this event) when, as part of a science demonstration of liquid nitrogen and dry ice, he got a bit over-ambitious in properties of cold materials and gases and put too much dry ice in a 2 liter bottle and sealed it too tightly. He literally was holding it in the air as it exploded and engulfed him in a rather large cloud. When the cloud cleared, he waved saying he was ok, revealing a rather large jagged piece of plastic embedded in his forearm. Went pretty deep too, it was pretty nasty looking but luckily it didn't hit any arteries and so didn't bleed very much. He was fine after a few stitches, but it obviously didn't go as planned.

      It's quite possible he was an idiot, and that normally this wouldn't happen, but I don't know that I would call it "as safe as you can get". There's potential for some injury at least, and a very real chance he could have been blinded had that chunk gone in the wrong direction. Thankfully no one else was standing nearby or they may have been hit with shrapnel too. Though since it turned out ok, it's a fun story at parties since you don't feel bad about it and can laugh. But I wouldn't recommend anyone try it just to get a story. Go on a road trip if you want stories.

      However, despite a risk for injury, I would still argue its important to be free to do experiments on private property, etc etc. Pick anything in the home and you can find a way to injure yourself with it; banning items because "chemistry is scary!" just makes people be stupid with something else, and doesn't really solve any problems. So I'd rather it be legal, and we rely on an educated public to not do anything too stupid.

    13. Re:Education is dangerous by calmofthestorm · · Score: 1

      Don't forget growing up to be responsible cogs in the machine.

      --
      93rd rule of Slashdot: No matter how obvious my sarcasm is, my comment will be taken seriously by someone.
    14. Re:Education is dangerous by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, a 2 liter is a pretty big version. We used to do it to great effect with eppendorf tubes. They make a satisfyingly loud pop and are of no danger at all - the lid just pops open.

      I've done a 2 - liter, it is really, really loud. Not regular firecracker loud - like m-80 loud. Compared with an m-80 in your hand, the 2 liter is probably safer. Compared with an m-80 at 5 feet, the 2 liter might be more dangerous. So I guess my point is arguable.

      compared to a firecracker, an eppendorf with dry ice or liquid nitrogen is super-safe. similar in bang, no fire.

    15. Re:Education is dangerous by Lord+Maud'Dib · · Score: 1

      Exactly, just like water is an asphyxiation risk. Have YOU read the MSDS sheets on water?

  8. Hyperbole or stupidity by wcrowe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So dry ice in a plastic soda bottle constitutes a "bomb" these days? I mean, I suppose you could "put an eye out" with it, but it's not really what I would call a "bomb". Are the police just stupid, or is the prosecuting attorney delving into hyperbole?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by crunch_ca · · Score: 1

      Next thing, it will be making desserts.

    2. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Cookie3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Back in 1999, a teacher at my High School was injured because a kid thought a dry ice bomb in a trash can would be a "funny" prank. I don't know how much dry ice was placed in the soda bottles -- I suspect they were 2L bottles -- but he put several bottles of dry ice in different trash cans around the school:

      http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qn4179/is_19990402/ai_n11719980/

      It's not mentioned in the article, but the teacher did suffer lacerations on his face -- an inch or two to either side, and he might have actually been blinded.

      I don't see how you can not call it a bomb. It's a device that explodes. Improperly placed (or designed), and it can hurt innocent bystanders. Putting dry ice and water in a sealed bottle can *ONLY* result in an explosion. What else would you call it?

      --
      present day... present time... hahahaha...
    3. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Cornelius+the+Great · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dry ice in a soda bottle can be dangerous (especially if you point the cap at someone), but certainly not an act of terrorism.

      It's funny how this story gets brought up right before the July 4 weekend- I can't buy any of the fireworks that I used to play with as a kid. I set off dry ice bombs at my high school with no police action resulted (this was before Columbine). I remember going out into the wilderness with a .22 rifle and hunting by myself at the age of 10. Had this been recent, my parents would be in the same boat as the mom in TFA.

      We're depriving our youth of the dangers and the excitement resulting from a combination of intelligence, curiosity, and access to a lot of cool chemicals and explosive materials. Now that Darwin has been defanged, we're a nation of pussies.

      I better go dismantle my potato cannon...

      --
      Sigs are for losers
    4. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So dry ice in a plastic soda bottle constitutes a "bomb" these days? I mean, I suppose you could "put an eye out" with it, but it's not really what I would call a "bomb". Are the police just stupid, or is the prosecuting attorney delving into hyperbole?

      When I was 13yo I had a friend in middle school that had recently returned from an out of state 4th of July vacation, and came home with a ton of illegal-in-my-state fireworks. I convinced him that it would be a great idea to bring a backpack full to school so we should shoot them off.

      Suffice to say that he did bring them, and we skipped the last class of the day and ventured out to the track and field long jump pit. Then, in a blaze of glory we lit off a backpack full of m-80's, black-cats, whistlers, smoke bombs, etc. Just about the time our hearing was returning, we noticed that all 4 grade level principals were rushing us.

      At the end of the day, we were yelled at by 4 school principals, 1 school superintendent, 1 county sheriff, 1 deputy sheriff, 4 city police officers, the city bomb squad, the county SWAT unit, the fire chief, the paramedics, and last but not least our parents. I had to pay $400 to sit through a 6hour juvenile delinquent rehab seminar.

      The best part is that my poor friend cried the whole time, while I laughed almost hysterically. Now, I told you that story so I could tell you this story: when I my father was 13yo, his neighbor had a son the same age, and they would often go hunting and fishing, and exploring together. The neighbor would often give his son and my father a crate of dynamite and simply tell them "you boys be careful, now!"

      The think-of-the-kids mentality is almost solely responsible for this pussification of the USA. Won't someone think of the adults!?!?

      --
      "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
    5. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Tom · · Score: 1

      He's probably missing one bomb conviction for the "all culprit types captures" achievement.

      And they talk about us computer games players losing contact with reality. They wouldn't know reality if it came knocking.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by alta · · Score: 1

      I hereby invite all /.ers to my house for July 4th. The only requirement is you have to bring your own fireworks, beer and copy of the constitution? Why the constitution? Because too many people have never read it so they don't even realize our rights are being eroded. Anyway, I live in alabama, I have 2 acres of land and there are 5 fireworks stands and a fireworks warehouse(http://tntfireworks.com/) 2 miles away.

      See you there, and someone bring me some yengling, blue moon or sam adams.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    7. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Zerth · · Score: 1

      A very inflexible balloon.

      Alternatively, balloons are rather mediocre bombs.

    8. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Dry ice should come with parental supervision, not just the parent "knowing about it". Dry ice in a bottle can be dangerous, and if the child (cough, I mean teenager), was doing it by themselves, this could constitute child endangerment. Its probably not a matter of that they were doing stuff with dry ice, but rather appropriate parental supervision was not applied.

      Baking soda volcanos and model rockets are also a part of childhood, but can also be dangerous if done wrong. I doubt that anyone would let a kid play with those without proper supervision.

      There is a big difference between "Knowing about it" and "supervision"

    9. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by TheLink · · Score: 4, Informative

      Put an eye out? I think you greatly underestimate the destructive power of such bombs:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZxsyL_RSsUw

      While maybe it shouldn't be outlawed or heavily regulated, it actually is very dangerous, if you look at the other video some other slashdotter linked to ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTP4yp8y_NA ), just see how close those stupid kids got to seriously injuring themselves or others.

      Most firecrackers and fireworks have fuses. So if you're not too stupid you can set those off in a controlled manner.

      Dry ice bombs like these don't.

      --
    10. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in high school in the 90's, we actually made a bunch of these as a class project during Chemistry, and set them off on the Football field (no, there wasn't anybody using the field).

      My senior year, our physics teacher used to get a kick out of making a "soap bubble" solution out of glycerin, and blowing bubbles with the natural gas for the Bunsons, then igniting them with a torch. We also would blow enormous bubbles using a rope and sliding rod, and a floor fan, which would get as large as a 3 foot radius... and send them down the hallways in the last 30 seconds before the period ended. Kids pour into the halls, filled with kid-sized bubbles. Mayhem, madness, fun.

      But I guess we just can't have that in society anymore, since 9/11 and all that. So everybody better put away their Vinegar and Baking Soda, because Heaven Forbid you should put it in a sealed container... you fucking terrorists.

    11. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Yup, the year after I graduated. I had heard a piece of the plastic trash can split off and stuck (not deep) into his chest. Argh, I can't believe I don't remember the teachers name... I think he was taught Drivers Ed among other things.

    12. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a UK /.er and we don't have a constitution, you insensitive clod! Am I still invited? And will there be tea?

    13. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      You can--potentially, never know, could have been an inch to the left--blind someone with a rubber band. Bombs have nails in them for shrapnel. If you want to see explosions look out for all the terrorist drivers detonating millions of them!

    14. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course. You can play the British in the revolutionary war re-enactment.

    15. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as you can easily see from the video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cTP4yp8y_NA they went off right in their face and they were fine. Totally harmless. You would have to be really really REALLY stupid and unlucky to hurt yourself with this.

    16. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Dry ice bombs have fuses. It takes a known amount of time for a known mass of CO2 to turn into gas at a known temperature. There's your fuse.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    17. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I was in graduate school at a really good technical institute in Massachusetts, we put a little liquid nitrogen in a 2 liter Coke bottle late one night, sealed it and placed it in a sink in the bathroom. When the bottle exploded a few minutes later, it completely obliterated the ceramic sink, leaving only small pieces behind. Fortunately, we were not in the line of sight of the explosion, otherwise, we would have certainly been seriously injured. As it was, my fellow student and I lost our hearing for a minute or so. The police were on the scene within minutes as someone 4 floors above reported a bomb explosion. The bathroom was sealed off with yellow tape for weeks. This was pre-9/11, otherwise, I am sure we would have been in deep water.

      Lesson: don't mess with overpressuring plastic soda bottles--they can really pack a punch.

    18. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The “controlled” property of a fuse is that you can attach one to a fully-assembled explosive device and it doesn’t start burning until you light one end.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Hatta · · Score: 1

      And a dry ice bomb doesn't start building pressure until you cap it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    20. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      It’s also not fully assembled until then, and it cannot be stored in that state for any reasonable length of time. The dry ice will evaporate.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    21. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Hatta · · Score: 1

      So it gets safer over time. That's even better.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    22. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, they really tried hard to be stupid and still weren't stupid enough to maim themselves. Aren't you glad most people aren't that stupid?

    23. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      And what if someone didn’t use quite enough dry ice or let too much gas escape before they capped it and it swells up tight as a drum but not quite full enough to pop?

      Percussion grenade.

      Where is your fuse now?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    24. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Getting the cap tight takes time. So you basically are holding on to the bomb after you have lit the fuse, and just hope the fuse burns for long enough.

      And it's a pretty crappy fuse:
      > It takes a known amount of time for a known mass of CO2 to turn into gas at a known temperature. There's your fuse

      It's normally not a known mass and temp. It's kids shoving CO2 chunks into bottles filled with water (of poorly controlled quantity and temperature).

      And when and how it blows up also depends on the strength of the bottle, cap and seal, which can vary.

      To quote: http://www.dryiceinfo.com/fog.htm

      "Small pieces of Dry Ice placed in an empty one liter plastic soda bottle and then filled with hot water may explode 2 to 120 seconds after the top is tightly screwed on. It also may crack anywhere and just fizzle. "

      Wikipedia says: 30 seconds to 30 minutes

      Such a high variation makes for rather unsafe fuse.

      Like I said, you can set fireworks off in a far more controlled manner. And it's even harder to safely deal with with an unexploded dry ice bomb than with fireworks that somehow haven't gone off.

      --
    25. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by alta · · Score: 1

      Sure, foreigners are welcome, and exempt from the constitution requirement.

      Yeah, we'll have tea... but probably not the way you like it... Iced, with sugar. (not a LOT of sugar like some around here like it)

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    26. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by alta · · Score: 1

      Yeah, guns/canons will be replaced with bottle rockets and roman candles.

      I suggest safety glasses.

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    27. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Hatta · · Score: 1

      That's why every kid needs a BB gun, to deal with situations like this.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    28. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I won’t argue with that...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    29. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In California, it is:

      CA Penal Code section
      12301. (a) The term "destructive device," as used in this chapter,
      shall include any of the following weapons: ...
            (6) Any sealed device containing dry ice (CO2) or other chemically
      reactive substances assembled for the purpose of causing an
      explosion by a chemical reaction.

      12303. Any person, firm, or corporation who, within this state,
      possesses any destructive device, other than fixed ammunition of a
      caliber greater than .60 caliber, except as provided by this chapter,
      is guilty of a public offense and upon conviction thereof shall be
      punished by imprisonment in the county jail for a term not to exceed
      one year, or in state prison, or by a fine not to exceed ten thousand
      dollars ($10,000) or by both such fine and imprisonment.

      Read it an weep!

    30. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see how you can not call a firecracker a bomb. It's a device that explodes. Improperly placed (or designed), and it can hurt innocent bystanders. Lighting a firecracker can *ONLY* result in an explosion. What else would you call it?

      Your mother, giving birth. boom.

    31. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      Dry ice bombs have fuses. It takes a known amount of time for a known mass of CO2 to turn into gas at a known temperature. There's your fuse.

      Emphasis mine.

      Somehow I doubt the kid was sitting there carefully weighing out his dry ice, looking at his thermometer, and checking the values against the table he drew up the week before after his tensile tests of the bottles.

    32. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by TruthSauce · · Score: 1

      Yes, and a book placed on the teacher's door is likely to cause more damage.

      The act of placing a bottle in a place where people are going to be around when it pops is the issue.... and it's EXACTLY the same issue as putting a heavy book on top of the door. Yes, it CAN injure someone. Yes, it IS wrong to do.

      No, making dry ice and soda (or a combination of them) a felony and arresting the parents for child endangerment... that's not the solution. Not even close. Not even in the same solar system...

    33. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baking soda volcanos and model rockets are also a part of childhood, but can also be dangerous if done wrong. I doubt that anyone would let a kid play with those without proper supervision.

      Are you serious? Every teenager I knew at least messed around with model rockets. Did your parents follow you around ALL the time? Sure, some kids need that kind of supervision so they don't go all goofy and aim at a neighbors bedroom window, but others are completely responsible. When I was 10, I used to go launch rockets all the time (that was the late 80s).

      There is a big difference between "Knowing about it" and "supervision"

      And that difference is up to the parent's discretion of their child's judgement.

      Frankly, when I was 13, we crossed the ocean in a 52 foot sailboat and I was given a 4 hour "watch" shift in the early morning while my parents slept. It was my duty to keep an eye out for collisions and monitor the radio for transmissions. We didn't change the watch schedules, even when we were crossing busy shipping lanes.

      Twice, I was alone on watch and we were on a collision course with a distant container ship. I radioed them to let them know we were there and where we would be turning and then steered the boat around them. Then I set it back on course after the danger had passed.

      I told my parents what had happened 3 hours later, after my shift was over.

      They knew I could be trusted with this, because I was responsible. They put their life in my hands (after they knew I was worthy of that trust) and because of it, I learned a great deal and feel like i'm a profoundly better person today. It's hard to explain how it feels at 13 to have the captain of one of the largest vehicles ever made by man call you "skipper" over the radio.

      Are you going to cry about "appropriate parental supervision" for me too? Or is the safety of two boats and a few dozen passengers less important than plastic bottles?

      Or do you recognize that not everyone should be forced to conform to this absurd cookie cutter mentality?

      I just don't get this whole attitude. Kids give exactly what they get. Treat them like imbeciles and they will act like one more often than not.

    34. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      In that case, the fuse is the loaded rifle a few feet away.

      Duh.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    35. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by RockWolf · · Score: 1

      The think-of-the-kids mentality is almost solely responsible for this pussification of the USA.

      Along these lines, I saw this video a couple of months ago. It's maybe a fraction overdone, but he makes some good points. Nutnfancy - Lessons of my father - depussification. Worth the time.

      --
      February 9th, 2009 8:55pm: Slashdot becomes self-aware.
    36. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      "And will there be tea?"

      Dunno, does your host have a harbor to pour it into?

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    37. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      Well.. you know AlGore had laws put in place that makes any CARBON emissions that result in 'more than a natural timed release' of any amount of carbon greater than .0001 ppm constitutes a man-made-WMD 'in the carbon sense'

      So I guess it is a global warming bomb??? == GLOBAL == hence WGD

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    38. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Phillidor · · Score: 1

      Laws are originally written to protect persons and property (e.g. Murder is illegal). As time moves forward and more legislation is passed, laws become more preemptive (e.g. gun control laws). Just as in the case of preemptive war, government is increasingly using violence to prevent the possibility of violence - only in domestic society rather than in foreign affairs. Of course, this simply guarantees that society will suffer from institutionalized violence via the state or the threat thereof. Arresting someone is an act of violence. Arresting someone for making a dry ice bomb when no person or property is hurt or damaged is premptive violence and is in my opinion unjustified. The use of preemptive violence by the authorities is a clear sign that society has been distorted well beyond what is natural or what the market would have allocated. If police services were bought and sold on the open market, I doubt that innocent dry ice bombs would receive such a harsh response. But that is what you get with socialism - even if it is only socialism of law enforcement. The think-of-the-kids mentality is part of the problem but only because people don't have to pay each time they want to act on it. Only the free market can help society approximate a rational allocation of resources. Ludwig von Mises proved this. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_calculation_problem

    39. Re:Hyperbole or stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well a case can be made against the student placing the item in the bin of reckless endangerment. Thats fair enough but to over react that the curiosity of another child who builds the same device and explodes it harmlessly is of equal guilt is ridiculous. The usual acts of a few being used against the majority rights I wont say more its too risky voicing opinions these days.

  9. A baking soda volcano is nothing... by KarrdeSW · · Score: 5, Funny

    The kid was probably plotting to wire a case of mentos and coca-cola to drench his neighborhood in sudsy death...

  10. Be thankful by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Be thankful they weren't taking photographs too, or they'd be looking at 25 in PMITA.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  11. Well, yeah actually. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 4, Interesting
    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:Well, yeah actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now there's an interesting comment. Having charged this kid are they going to go back and find all the guys who did this and posted the result on Youtube and charge them as well. They have the evidence self published by the now possibly considered criminals.

    2. Re:Well, yeah actually. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The video shows the "bombs" literally blowing up in their faces and their hands with seemingly little damage to the people involved. So, yes, I'd agree with the original poster that a dry ice bomb is really a joke as a bomb. I've done more dangerous experiments with firecrackers, which REALLY can blow your fingers off. This is just another example of our "Nanny State" in action.

    3. Re:Well, yeah actually. by tokul · · Score: 1

      It does pack a wallop!

      Idiots haven't learned anything after 0:48 and tried to prank (or injure) another person.

  12. Next to outlaw... Potato Guns! by Swampcritter · · Score: 1

    If you want to see more of the crude and actual childhood secrets that many of us did, you should see the Fark comments of the original post (yesterday):

    There are lots of activities you can do with your teenage son, but helping him make bombs out of dry ice shouldn't be one of them. (omaha.com)
    http://www.fark.com/cgi/comments.pl?IDLink=5457524&cpp=1

  13. Watch out! by rotide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If over pressurizing a container until it explodes is a felony, make sure your kids don't:

    1) Blow up a finished juice box and stomp on it.
    2) Blow up a plastic bag and hit it.
    3) Blow up and pop a balloon.
    4) Pop bubble packaging wrap.
    5) Blowing and popping bubble gum.

    Those are all variations on the same theme. Now I get it, dry ice "bombs" can cause injury if used without a tiny bit of common sense. But then again, a staircase can be deadly if used incorrectly. But yes, I see the "safety" factor, but a felony? Are we serious?

    1. Re:Watch out! by blueg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If setting people's houses on fire is a felony, make sure you don't light a charcoal grill. It's a variation on the same theme.

    2. Re:Watch out! by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      It's an overzealous cop filing a bullshit charge that the Judge is as liable as not to throw right on out as long as the lady or her counsel don't fubar themselves out of the gate on.

      However, it does show that we've got a problem on our hands as a nation- and it needs to have the people wake up from the sleep of the intellect and walk away from the bread and circuses going on over the Television and the Internet.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:Watch out! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      6) Make popcorn

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    5. Re:Watch out! by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      It was a 14 year old with dry ice. How much common sense do you think he has? Just asking.

    6. Re:Watch out! by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Using some products contrary to it's intended purpose *is* a felony. Usually this warning is on drugs or chemicals.

      It sucks but we're just going to have to get used to this and more shit like it. Someday it may even be illegal to write a program without a license.

    7. Re:Watch out! by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      Is it illegal to burn your own house down (making sure there is no-one inside)?

    8. Re:Watch out! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Possibly. If it is near other houses, you are endangering them, and it is fraud if you try to collect insurance for it afterward.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    9. Re:Watch out! by RabidMoose · · Score: 1

      A whole house? Hell, where I live, it's illegal to burn your trash in a back yard bonfire. I don't even want to think about what fees the HOA would levy against me.

    10. Re:Watch out! by demonbug · · Score: 1

      It also releases all sorts of dangerous chemicals into the atmosphere, so is not generally accepted as a legitimate way to demolish a house. So yes, you could quite possibly be charged with a crime (or at least fined) for burning your own house down.

    11. Re:Watch out! by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      Here you just need a permit to do it.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  14. Re:Good by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Maybe if you had blown some shit up as a child you'd be a better troll today.

  15. "destructive device" by v1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the weak point of this particular law. It's one of those "vague, let the officers interpret it" laws, so in reality, the law isn't determining if what you are doing is illegal, the officers are, and that's not how the legal system is supposed to work.

    If they wanted to drag this out, I'm sure their lawyer could mount their main attack on "destructive device" and pull a win, because it would be trivial to show that the term could apply to a wide variety of things that no reasonable person would consider unlawful. Once you show a law can be used to convict even one innocent person, the law becomes unenforceable in court.

    They probably will simply get the charges dropped, because the cops usually like having vague laws like that on the books because it allows them to make more flexible judgement calls. (which can be good OR bad for the public, and that's the problem) They won't want this to go to court because they'll lose their bad (but useful) law if it does. Or at least get a precedent set against it on the books.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:"destructive device" by MMC+Monster · · Score: 1

      Have someone testify that the number of items in the court room that could be considered destructive measures in the tens of thousands (if not orders of magnitude higher).

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    2. Re:"destructive device" by i.r.id10t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Destructive devices are NFA items and are covered/controlled by the BATFE. The same BATFE that ruled that a shoe lace can make a machine gun ...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:"destructive device" by siwelwerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once you show a law can be used to convict even one innocent person, the law becomes unenforceable in court.

      Really? So since innocent people have been exonerated after having been convicted of murder, murder laws are now unenforceable in court?

    4. Re:"destructive device" by NewWorldDan · · Score: 1

      The problem, as I see it, isn't so much in letting the officers interpret it; it's fundamentally impossible for a code of laws to describe every possible scenario. The problem is that juries are generally instructed to not interpret the law, but merely accept the government's interpretation.

    5. Re:"destructive device" by Craigj0 · · Score: 1

      > Once you show a law can be used to convict even one innocent person, the law becomes unenforceable in court.
      Once they are convicted they are not innocent. That is why they made a law.

    6. Re:"destructive device" by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Bonus points if you can bring Chuck Norris in to testify that.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    7. Re:"destructive device" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but because it can be used to make a machine gun, it is itself a machine gun.

    8. Re:"destructive device" by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they did (eventually) concede that "the string itself is not a machinegun", so they're not totally batshit insane.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    9. Re:"destructive device" by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      Are you being that dense on purpose? He means that if a law is so broad it includes innocent activities, it's not enforceable. Which is also wrong. If you want to use a murder as an example, it's more like murder laws would be struck down if they defined murder so broadly that it included buying milk.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    10. Re:"destructive device" by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      Charles Manson can tell you that the sky is blue, and water is wet. He's still batshit insane.

      I'll let you draw your own conclusion from this comment.

    11. Re:"destructive device" by ChipMonk · · Score: 1

      "Once they are convicted they are not innocent."

      Tell that to the former death-row inmates who were exonerated by new forensics.

    12. Re:"destructive device" by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      > Once you show a law can be used to convict even one innocent person, the law becomes unenforceable in court.
      Once they are convicted they are not innocent. That is why they made a law.

      What???

      Um.. No. If a person is Innocent of a crime, then they are innocent. Whether they were convicted of the crime or not does not change their innocence, only whether they were wrongly convicted or not.

      People are innocent until proven guilty. Even then, sometimes they are still innocent, as the evidence is sometimes interpreted incorrectly, inadequate, or falsified.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    13. Re:"destructive device" by delinear · · Score: 1

      No, that would just have the effect of outlawing buying milk, it wouldn't negate the law against murder. Of course, in practice sufficient people would complain that the law would be changed.

    14. Re:"destructive device" by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      The same BATFE that ruled that a shoe lace can make a machine gun

      And the problem with that is .... ?

      I mean, I think the word "machinegun" is completely outdated, and most people apply it incorrectly, but other than that they're completely right. This is no different than filing down the seer on a trigger mech in order to make an AR-15 go from semi-auto to full auto. It doesn't matter HOW you do it - what matters is whether it can fire multiple shots with one pull of the trigger.

    15. Re:"destructive device" by Sparohok · · Score: 1

      Did you actually look up the law before you offered your legal opinon? It's not hard, just Google "Nebraska law destructive device." It certainly isn't vague nor does it leave room for interpretation. It explicitly categorizes CO2 "bombs" as destructive devices.

      Nebraska Penal Code 28-1213(7)(a) Destructive devices means: (i)(I) vessel or container intentionally caused to rupture or mechanically explode by expanding pressure from any gas, acid, dry ice, or other chemical mixture

      http://law.justia.com/nebraska/codes/s28index/s2812013000.html

      At least the Nebraska law requires the intent to "use as a weapon against person or property;" California has a similar law, a felony with a 2 year mandatory minimum sentence, with no such stipulation. Indeed in California, even possessing dry ice and a soda bottle with the intent to put the one inside the other is a felony.

      Do not mess around with CO2 "bombs" unless you are very familiar with the applicable law in your state. You could end up in very, very serious, very expensive trouble.

    16. Re:"destructive device" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The crazy part is that until recently apparently, (assuming Rogerborg is correct) they considered any combination of a shoelace and a keyring to be a machine gun through the principle of constructive possession. In other words, by possessing all the parts, you also possess a machine gun.

      So yes, they basically wrote a law that through selective enforcement could convict any American citizen of a felony - through stupidity or maliciousness, nobody's quite sure.

    17. Re:"destructive device" by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      So can pants. Search YouTube for "bump fire."

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
  16. I comfortably survived these as a child: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Flour dust in a closed container
    2. Acetylene and Oxygen balloon
    3. Acetylene and Oxygen trash bag ...
    Add your own to the list

    1. Re:I comfortably survived these as a child: by AntEater · · Score: 1

      Yes, you apparently survived them, but the Acetyline and Ox. in a trash bag is quite dangerous. There's a lot of power with that volume and a trash bag can produce a static spark on its own pretty easily. I had a friend in high school who ignited a few bags with some impressive results. Scary stuff.

      --
      Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
    2. Re:I comfortably survived these as a child: by Spazntwich · · Score: 1

      I remember the unending quest to find a glass bottle with cap threads compatible with super soakers.

      At the time, we didn't appreciate the shoddy construction of those water guns. If they hadn't immediately fallen apart when taken to functional limits, we probably would have managed to kill ourselves.

  17. Another potential WMD by dcsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow - it's a good thing he wasn't caught releasing internally produced methane and igniting it. Mom could have been charged with feeding him beans.

    --
    This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    1. Re:Another potential WMD by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Who needs to light it? For many, the methane, combined with the other elements that come out with it are lethal enough as is...

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    2. Re:Another potential WMD by mach1980 · · Score: 1

      Wow - it's a good thing he wasn't caught releasing internally produced methane and igniting it. Mom could have been charged with feeding him beans.

      This is ok as long as you carbon compensate.

      --
      Break the sound barrier - bring the noise.
  18. A law I wish existed... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Enemy of freedom and democracy". Citizens could arrest legislators, judges, heads of state, and law enforcement persons for violating the principles of a free and libertarian democracy.

    The charges would be adjudicated by all citizens of the town, state, or country (whichever scope was more appropriate). If a majority of those voting agreed to convict, then the person in question would be banished or, if he so chose, could cut down a tree with a herring.

    1. Re:A law I wish existed... by devnullkac · · Score: 1

      In many non-democratic states established in the last half century they call that "counter revolutionary activity." Not something I'm eager to see in the USA.

      --
      What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
    2. Re:A law I wish existed... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      In many non-democratic states established in the last half century they call that "counter revolutionary activity."

      I don't think that's right. That term is usually used by the post-revolution government to prosecute people, rather than applied by the non-governing populace to charge government officials.

    3. Re:A law I wish existed... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      So an overly Christian town in Texas could banish their own judge who applies the federal law strictly ?

      Note that I love the idea of making representative more directly accountable for their actions. Unfortunately, I think still some more time has to pass...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    4. Re:A law I wish existed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, there's quite a few laws that accomplish this on the books already- but it's more of what the populace knows about and gives a tinker's damn about as to what gets done.

      Every day, there's willful and egregious violations of the...

      Fourth Amendment (Affidavits incorrect, locations incorrect, items seized not on the warrant, served the cover letter and nothing else, etc...).
      Fifth Amendment (Wrongful takings in civil seizures, typically caused by the Fourth Amendment violations, trying to avoid needing to Mirandize people, etc...).
      Sixth Amendment (Anonymous tips are inadmissible hearsay in a Court, per the requirement of being confronted by your accusers... If they went off of a tip and can't produce the tipster for cross, it's not a case per Crawford V. Washington...).

      These things expose the law enforcement people and the DA's to civil and criminal liabilities. Unfortunately, it's a bold thing to go about doing this- and often entails getting the help of the ACLU or some other funding source as the litigation's not cheap.

      And this doesn't get into the literally thousands of explicitly Unconstitutional laws on the books at the city, county, state, or Federal levels. Laws that can't be abided by because they're entirely too vague. Laws that impinge upon the Bill of Rights (Don't let anyone fool you into thinking "State's Rights" removes most of the BoR- the Fourteenth Amendment explicitly applies much of that to the States (and thereby the Counties and Cities as an extension of the State...).)

      Your rights do not automatically get honored in this space. They are only available to a belligerent citizen asserting them in face of government opposition in most cases.

    5. Re:A law I wish existed... by oblivinated · · Score: 1

      This is terrible. Never trust the crowds, you'll end up with McCarty style witch hunts.

    6. Re:A law I wish existed... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      This is terrible. Never trust the crowds, you'll end up with McCarty style witch hunts.

      Perhaps you're right. But if the government refuses to protect our liberties, then with what recourse are we left?

    7. Re:A law I wish existed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course! Why didn't we think of that before? The average citizen is brilliant, deeply educated, and wields a thorough understanding of law.

    8. Re:A law I wish existed... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would require having a free and libertarian democracy to begin with.

  19. ive done all that by sqkybeaver · · Score: 0

    when i was younger my brother and i used to half fill 2 letre coke bottles and presurize to 9 psi and shoot them into the air, 20 years ago all the cops could do is tells us not to point them at peoples houses. the laws on the books are to broad. sure curiosity kills cats, but it puts kids and thire parents in to legal situations totaly unnesscary. at least the kid was supervised by an adult!

    1. Re:ive done all that by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure you could consider 9psi as pressurized.

    2. Re:ive done all that by sqkybeaver · · Score: 0

      i meant 90 old keyboard some keys are wierd

  20. When Mentos is outlawed by RevWaldo · · Score: 4, Funny

    only outlaws will have Mentos.

    .

    1. Re:When Mentos is outlawed by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      only outlaws will have Mentos.

      They already do. If you've seen the Mentos commercials from 5-10 years ago, it's clear that those people deserved to be in the Gulag.

    2. Re:When Mentos is outlawed by AioKits · · Score: 1

      Just had this cool metal image of an entire bank robbery done to the Mentos style music and commercial theme:

      'Doo doo doo doo, doo-doo, do-Wah!'
      It doesn't matter what comes, fresh goes better in life, and Mentos is fresh and full of life.
      Nothing gets to you, staying fresh staying cool, with Mentos, fresh and full of life.
      Fresh goes better, Mentos freshness, fresh goes better with Mentos, fresh and full of life!
      Mentos, the freshmaker!

      Then cut to one of the robbers hanging out the side window of the getaway car holding some Mentos and a huge smile.

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    3. Re:When Mentos is outlawed by Polo · · Score: 1

      When marriage is outlawed...
      ...only outlaws will have in-laws.

  21. watch out future scientists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets hope the Omaha PD doesn't find out about any high school science fairs.

  22. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  23. Should we do something about it, or just mock it? by hedpe2003 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Now, I recognize I do not know the whole story - but this kind of pisses me off, to be honest. It looks to me, like this was either an experiment or just plain fun. I recognize that the cops would be called for such a loud noise, but an arrest is ridiculous; and, it seems most people here agree. Should we do something about it, or just mock it?

    Contact Juvenile Division

    Contact Criminal Division

    --
    Comprehensive solutions via a competition of ideas like no other.
  24. Friends of mine did the same thing... by Bicx · · Score: 1

    ... back when i was younger, except they used rubbing alcohol and chlorine. It was fun to watch, and it wasn't dangerous if you stood back and detonated them in a field. Basically there is a delayed reaction between the rubbing alcohol and the chlorine which gave about 10 seconds before changing to a deep yellow color and rapidly producing chlorine gas that exploded a soda bottle. This led to more experimentation that resulted in their creation of a PVC mortar-like cannon used to launch softballs about 70 yards. Talk about cool.

  25. Peter Brady - undersupervised and troubled youth by RevWaldo · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O4KMk6T5mQU

    (Note the video poster makes a Freudian decontextualization of the scene in his comments. Dude, sometime as cigar is just a cigar.)

    .

  26. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to do stuff like this all the time when I was a kid. We (it was a conspiracy) used to burn stuff (nothing that was alive) and see if we could get things to explode. Carbide was a lot of fun. Also, amazing what you can do with even small amounts of gasoline and other flammable solvents. This was all good fun. It is a normal part of growing up. We never had the cops visit (we were smart enough or lucky enough to avoid alarming the neighbors.)

  27. destructive device? by Billkamm · · Score: 1

    felony "possession of a destructive device"? I have all sorts of destructive devices in my house. A sledge hammer, a chainsaw, kitchen knifes, box cutters, crowbar, hedge clippers, scissors, etc... am I going to be in some sort of trouble?

    1. Re:destructive device? by delinear · · Score: 1

      It's Chuck Norris I feel sorry for, his entire body is a destructive device. Expect the feds to turn up and perform a controlled detonation any time.

  28. Fireworks are banned here, too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC, "possession of a destructive device" is legalese for "in posession of fireworks or their ilk". Not legal within city limits

    1. Re:Fireworks are banned here, too by dotfile · · Score: 1

      Actually, "destructive device" has a specific definition in Federal regulations, courtesy of our friends at the BATFE. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destructive_device

      Different states may have additional legal definitions. Nebraska's is here: http://law.justia.com/nebraska/codes/s28index/s2812013000.html. I find 7(b) particularly interesting; it seems to me that if the kid's bottle "bomb" was not intended to damage property or injure people, but just to make something go "BOOM", then it's not a destructive device. Hmmm. Perhaps Mom knowing about the kid's experiment would be a strong indication that he wasn't planning to blow something up (other than the soda bottle) or hurt anyone.

  29. Bill Nye by wazzzup · · Score: 1

    I think Bill Nye should redo his entire show episodes filmed from a cave with a couple of bodyguards and AK-47's behind him.

    C'mon people - when did we forget what it was like to be a boy? It's how we learn. Are taping several bottle rockets together to make it multi-stage and seeing what lights on fire with a magnifying glass going to be terrorist activities too? Do we need a 3-day waiting period for building a potato gun?

    It's amazing what a little bit of fear and fear-mongering (I'm talking to you the Fox News) will do to the way people interact with the world.

  30. Soccer Ball by Tisha_AH · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We did something similar in our teen years while working at a recreation center with a soccer ball.

    Having found a spare soccer ball and with one of those desktop mounted air pumps we would put an increasing amount of pressure into the soccer ball and then the guys would bounce the thing around the gym. This went in stages, a little more pressure, the guys would go back to kicking the ball around the building, then back for more air pressure...

    After seven or eight of these cycles of increasing pressure in the soccer ball it took on a distinct metallic sound when bouncing. The soccer ball had about 115 PSI in it and the guys decided to kick it around the hallway that connected several of the rooms in the recreation center. I was watching the fun and one of the guys kicked the ball and it hit the edge of a table and was bouncing up and down on top of the table. From 25 feet away I could hear brittle cracking sounds coming from the ball... At the last instant I have the picture of one of the guys running away from the ball with a look of fear on his face. Right at that moment the ball exploded like a bomb.

    The sound of the explosion just left my ears with a buzzy, ringing sound as the guys are laughing their asses off. Quickly they grabbed all of the soccer ball shrapnel and hid it right as the senior citizens group was pouring out of their meeting room. There were retirees who must have served in WW II who were looking for the 250 pound bomb crater or airplane crash, asking furious questions about where the bomb went off.

    To their credit, the guys just looked quizzically at the senior citizens and said "what noise?".

    Doing a post mortem on the soccer ball one of the sewn panels failed and ejected the air bladder from the ball. The soccer ball skin was turned inside out. There were tiny little shards of rubber ball liner everywhere.

    Kids do stupid stuff. Outlaw CO2 (since it is a greenhouse gas and eeevil too). Adults will not stop the never-ending quest by kids for things that go BOOM!

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:Soccer Ball by 3dr · · Score: 1

      During the summer last year, we heard an explosion in the back yard. It turned out to be my daughter's soccer ball that was sitting in the sun. The outer skin must have been very weakly stitched, because we never had but 7-8psi in it.

    2. Re:Soccer Ball by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of the time a garbage truck ran over a soccer ball in my old neighborhood. One of the hexagons was fused to the street for 10 years.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    3. Re:Soccer Ball by SBJ95 · · Score: 1

      Outlawing CO2 would solve ALL the problems! There'd be nobody left to cause them.

  31. i'd like to propose an arrest: by circletimessquare · · Score: 1, Insightful

    any proponent of libertarianism who wishes to whittle away government regulations until the power vacuum is filled by corporations, who are not interested in our freedom or democracy at all

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the best posts I've ever seen on /.

    2. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by mldi · · Score: 1

      any proponent of libertarianism who wishes to whittle away government regulations until the power vacuum is filled by corporations, who are not interested in our freedom or democracy at all

      Yes, the politicians have purist interests in our freedoms and democracy. You're SOOOOO right.

      Here's the facts:
      1. When there's power or money involved, there's corruption 2. Corporations have money and power 3. Politicians have money and power 4. Both are equally corruptable

      Additionally, who do you think controls the politicians now? Never heard of a lobbyist?

      Lastly... the corporations can't make up stupid laws or arrest you for making dry ice bombs.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    3. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by kvezach · · Score: 1

      At least you can (in theory) elect your representatives. A corporation has no such flaw: it's a plutocratic oligarchy through and through.

      I say "in theory" because the United States implementation of democracy is broken (Gerrymandering, two-party rule, you name it). Yet that is no argument against democracy, merely one against a particular implementation of it.

      Lastly... the corporations can't make up stupid laws or arrest you for making dry ice bombs.

      In a libertarian system, eventually one of the corporations will end up with enough economic power that it can rewrite the rules of the game. When that happens, that corporation will translate the economic power into physical power and effectively make itself the new state, and then it can make whatever laws it wants.

    4. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Libertarian, n: person who believes in privatising oppression.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      any proponent of libertarianism who wishes to whittle away government regulations until the power vacuum is filled by corporations, who are not interested in our freedom or democracy at all

      Yes, the politicians have purist interests in our freedoms and democracy. You're SOOOOO right.

      Here's the facts:

      1. When there's power or money involved, there's corruption

      2. Corporations have money and power

      3. Politicians have money and power

      4. Both are equally corruptable

      Additionally, who do you think controls the politicians now? Never heard of a lobbyist?

      Lastly...AND MOST IMPORTANTLY the corporations can't make up stupid laws or arrest you for making dry ice bombs.

      FIFY

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    6. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by mldi · · Score: 1

      In a libertarian system, eventually one of the corporations will end up with enough economic power that it can rewrite the rules of the game. When that happens, that corporation will translate the economic power into physical power and effectively make itself the new state, and then it can make whatever laws it wants.

      Possible but not likely. Unless a corporation has exclusive access to a needed resource, there's always going to be competition. The reason we don't see as much now in a lot of areas is because it's a legalized monopoly, or the regulations are piled on so thick that only the big boys and play the game. Then you end up with real economic powers controlling your voted-in politicians... no matter who you voted in.

      Now, I would just simply argue that any extreme view won't work. Obviously a purely libertarian system in it's extreme won't work (we need interstates, for example), but these days, in my opinion, we could use a good dose. Over regulation and ridiculous laws that only the big boys can fight in court are plaguing this country. We're propping up a broken economic system with toothpicks and bubble gum with bailout money and ridiculous patent grants. Then our politicians listen to these clowns because they contribute the most cash.

      Corporations love power too, no doubt, but I imagine they are more effective at playing the cat's paw and staying out of public light than being at the front and center, pissing everybody off and losing business because of it.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    7. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by kvezach · · Score: 1

      Possible but not likely. Unless a corporation has exclusive access to a needed resource, there's always going to be competition. The reason we don't see as much now in a lot of areas is because it's a legalized monopoly, or the regulations are piled on so thick that only the big boys and play the game. Then you end up with real economic powers controlling your voted-in politicians... no matter who you voted in.

      Whether or not a corporation will be able to rewrite the rules depends on whether the barriers to entry can be made high enough that the corporation can then devote itself to gaining power through first accumulating monopoly profit, and second by translating that economic power into physical power. To do the second isn't so hard to imagine: all it would have to do would be to absorb a few of the private defense contractors (in extreme libertarianism, at least). To do the first, there are many effects that could lead to a strong monopoly. For instance, the sector in which it operates might support great economies of scale, so that entrants to the market has no way of competing with the monopoly, or it may support few enough companies that collusion will occur.

      The real economic powers controlling the politicians is a form of corruption or collusion in itself. It is powerful in the US because of the broken state of the democratic system. For that reason, among others, I favor an electoral system that gives third parties and independents a real chance: more candidates means that it's much harder to corrupt all of them. For that matter, if you want to be radical, pick a very large assembly randomly and let it elect from among its numbers to Congress - hard to systematically corrupt that.

      One might also extend a libertarian "do it yourself" heuristic to all levels: if a decision will affect a certain group, that group (and only that group) should decide whether to do it. Thus, it's the business of nobody else what you do inside your home, but organizations that face externality or have significant power would have to take the external parties into account. The hard part, of course, is to actually implement that heuristic - I don't think Coasian bargaining would work - and some people would say every action affects everybody hence we have a rationale for a large state.

      In sum, I suppose I don't really oppose a decentralized society. What I don't like is the capitalist aspect that gets entangled with it in American libertarianism, where the market is considered robust enough to keep corporations from becoming the new states, and consumer democracy good enough to keep those who have power in check. The robber baron era, as well as the case of company towns, seems to show otherwise.

    8. Re:i'd like to propose an arrest: by mldi · · Score: 1

      For that reason, among others, I favor an electoral system that gives third parties and independents a real chance: more candidates means that it's much harder to corrupt all of them.

      Step 1: find the corrupt politician (not a very hard thing to do, no matter what party).
      Step 2: give large sums of money to cause and feed the piranha media
      Step 3: ???
      Step 4: Profit!!!

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  32. Idle hands are the devil's tools by PackMan97 · · Score: 1

    This is nothing. Back in the day I lived in a state that allowed fireworks. Typically around New Years my friends and I would get some empty wrapping paper rolls, some bottle rockets and pretend like we had bazookas. Light a bottle rocket it, stick it in one end, watch it come out the other and go wherever you pointed it. I'm sure that was breaking some kind of law, but it sure was fun. Of course we were smart enough to go out into the woods where no annoying parents or busy bodies were around to see.

    1. Re:Idle hands are the devil's tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bottle rocket bazookas were fun, but even better was just throwing the rockets. It added an unpredictability that was a lot more interesting.

    2. Re:Idle hands are the devil's tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a typical new years eve in Cologne, Germany. Except that it is thousands of people doing it and in the middle of a city. It is advisable to wear thick, non-flammable clothing that night!

    3. Re:Idle hands are the devil's tools by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      Roman Candles and metal garbage can lid "shields" are MUCH more fun for that. Not only is the roman candle cool enough to hold in a bare hand, but the projectile makes a fantastic shower of sparks when it strikes the opponents shield.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    4. Re:Idle hands are the devil's tools by Ozeroc · · Score: 1

      And they're bigger than bottle rockets!

      --
      ...
  33. Gateway bomb... by bobdotorg · · Score: 1

    Ah yes - what we used to call the 'Tonic Bomb'. My first encounter with it was quite by accident - I used to make orange soda by putting a few cc of dry ice into a 2 liter bottle of OJ. I was eight years old, and fortunately my dad had the foresight to tell me, "You'd better do that outside." BOOM!!! with a CO2 vapor cloud that took a while to dissipate on that hot humid midwest summer evening.

    Harmless? Hardly. It was a gateway bomb. A few years later (8th grade chemistry) I figured out that the oxy-acetylene tanks in our garage had a use far greater than fueling a cutting torch. Punching bag balloons with a real punch. Got in trouble for those. Probably because I set them off behind the police station.

    Fortunately this happened in the 1980's, so I was not labelled a terrorist, and merely had to go to juvi court and promise to not do it again. And I didn't. Until I was an undergrad with unlimited access to whatever raw materials I wanted.

    Bombs made as an undergrad, and since, have been bigger and better. But most importantly, safer. Today the thought of five cubic feet of primary explosive (72% O2 + 28% C2H2) in a balloon frightens me.

    Some people are going to want to blow shit up. Many of these people will actually attempt it. Teach them how to do it safely.

    --
    __ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
    1. Re:Gateway bomb... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Add some coffee creamer to that balloon and you get a nice fireball

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Gateway bomb... by Cytotoxic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I caught the bug too. Ended up with a level 2 model rocket habit.

      College chemistry led to the synthesis of real primary explosives - pinhead sized bits that sound off like a firecracker when you hit them. A couple of us made some silver fulminate and let it precipitate onto the chem building foyer floor overnight. We got nice patches of explosive floor - think snap n' pop sized pops with every step. We didn't get in trouble, we got semi-legendary status and a good laugh from the department chair on the departmental retreat. A member of the faculty even gave us a tip on where we could get larger quantities of silver nitrate. Times have changed.

      (BTW - c2h2 + O2 is a combustion reaction, not a primary explosive - but we know what you were going for).

  34. I'm sure the kid will be better off by colonelquesadilla · · Score: 1

    as a ward of the state. This is classified as idle, and it's easy to laugh at the absurdity of it. But seriously, the parent is facing child endangerment charges, as well as posession of a destructive device. That means likely serious jail time, and even more likely that the child will be taken into foster care, and almost certainly be treated very badly. Furthermore, he will grow up having had his life ruined by the law. Something relatively harmless becomes a series of good reasons to actually deploy destructive devices or turn to crime.

    --
    It's either false dichotomies, or the terrorists win, you decide.
  35. my mom would be serving a life sentence by alta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wow, is this what we're coming to? When I was a kid (34 now) I did all kinds of stuff that would now get someone in my family put in jail. It's not like I never got caught, it's just that people understood what 'boys will be boys' meant back then. Sure I didn't personally make a bomb (I would have) but you could have locked me up many times over for incendiary devices, or as I got older, reckless driving.

    It's sad that it's come to this. How many of the worlds smartest people did dangerous things when they were kids? How many electrical engineers played with electricity? How many fire fighters played with fires? How many SWAT team members shot guns and made bombs? How many architects, civil engieers or constructions workers built forts out of wood the re-appropriated from their neighbors fences? How many lemon-aid stand kids are now rich capitalists?

    Our government now only promotes mediocrity, not excellence.

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    1. Re:my mom would be serving a life sentence by z4ce · · Score: 1

      Ohh.. playing with electricity... Reminds me of around 11 when I got a used neon sign transformer.. 30,000 volts of zapping power.. I was melting anything I could find. When you would turn the thing on all of the dust in the room would go zooming. Sometimes I seriously can't believe I played with that thing.. I'm not sure I want to know what 500 watts or so at 30 or 40kV would have done to me had I accidentally touched the live wires.. Man that was awesome though...

  36. Destructive Device ? by kjshark · · Score: 1

    I guess once police proclaim something a 'destructive device" all rights can be removed from anyone who happens to standing around. The law doesn't seem to be too specific as to how destructive something is, or what it could destroy. I have a devices which destroy wood. You know, saws, gouges, routers, drills, sanders. Think of the damage you could do with those. Much more than dry ice in a plastic bottle.

    --
    The difference between truth and fiction is that fiction has to be plausible.
    1. Re:Destructive Device ? by careysub · · Score: 1

      I guess once police proclaim something a 'destructive device" all rights can be removed from anyone who happens to standing around. The law doesn't seem to be too specific as to how destructive something is, or what it could destroy. I have a devices which destroy wood. You know, saws, gouges, routers, drills, sanders. Think of the damage you could do with those. Much more than dry ice in a plastic bottle.

      Worse still, since these are considered by the police to be "bombs" this means they are also - wait for it - Weapons of Mass Destruction. See: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/718/usc_sec_18_00002332---a000-.html (see C.2.A) and http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode18/usc_sec_18_00000921----000-.html .

      Once declared a WMD, then they get to throw the really heavy Book of Rules at the Mom.

      --
      Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
    2. Re:Destructive Device ? by kjshark · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, she could wind up in Gitmo !

      --
      The difference between truth and fiction is that fiction has to be plausible.
    3. Re:Destructive Device ? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      The law doesn't seem to be too specific as to how destructive something is, or what it could destroy. I have a devices which destroy wood. You know, saws, gouges, routers, drills, sanders.

      None of which are destructive devices according to the law. It's actually pretty specific. Oh wait, you didn't read the law... you read the summary words "destructive devices".

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
  37. In other news by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    kid farts, parents detained for manufacturing biological WMD

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  38. SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by purduephotog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Contrary to the humorous jokes about popping balloons, mentos and coke, etc- these do have significant explosive force. When they're at full pressure they can maim. While the first google search of "dry ice bomb accident" turns up a youtube video of a small bottle, one can also see videos from Mythbusters where they used 2 liter containers.

    Very quickly you can see that putting one of these inside of a mailbox can do serious damage.

    These are no different than the drain bombs of my 'youth' when kids were stuffing them in mailboxes everywhere. Those did cause serious injuries- given the reaction of the lye and the shrapnel from the explosions.

    Should Mom be charged? No, she shouldn't, and there should be some common sense applied. But since a 14 year old can't exactly buy dry ice (at least not at the places I fill my CO2 tanks at) then she was supplying him- and if she wasn't supervising him doing this... there is a degree of recklessness that needs to be addressed.

    Maybe she doesn't understand how dangerous these things can be? I doubt the kid was wearing a face shield with gloves and an apron to protect himself incase of premature detonation.

    As a society we all would pay if this child was injured. That's the overriding concern- and society would be screaming right now if the police had showed up, said "Oh, OK, keep at it" and left... and then the kid was in an accident and cost (lets say an eye) his sight.

    You can't have it both ways.

    1. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by sheddd · · Score: 1

      "As a society we all would pay if this child was injured"

      I hate this argument; once the government really starts protecting us, there's nothing left to protect. I prize my right to do stupid shit to my self dearly.

    2. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      When I was in college one of my fellow physics majors actually did injure his eyes with a very similar device. The plastic shatters into small enough pieces that it isn't easily removed from the eye. His vision got better after 6 mo. or so.

      The justice system should make sure to have some sanity in this case, but it was appropriate for the authorities to become involved.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    3. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by the+plant+doctor · · Score: 1

      A 14 YO can't buy dry ice?

      I reckon if he could walk to his local grocery store he could. At least here you can buy it for your cooler and I'm not aware of any restrictions on it. There may be like the restrictions on buying spray paint, I've never tried.

    4. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      As a society we all would pay if this child was injured.

      So how many shares of his productivity do I own? I just want to know how my property is doing is all.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    5. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Most parents allow their kids to ride bikes. My cousin's friend lost his leg due to a bike accident. Authorities should stop all children on bikes and arrest their parents.

    6. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What this is totally false. I was a self declared pro,along with every other kid in my neighborhood, at making these "toys". The dry ice water variant is incredibly safe. Its simple physics. The amount of force required to pop the 2 liter soda bottle is not powerful enough to propel a projectile to a significant amount of speed to cause any real damage. Try putting a 5oz lead fishing weight in one of these and let it go off. Walk up to aftermath and observe the weight has moved 5inches. THEY ARE HARMLESS! And if the kid wanted to make something more dangerous, so what. That's have future chemist are born.

    7. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Try putting a 5oz lead fishing weight in one of these and let it go off. Walk up to aftermath and observe the weight has moved 5inches. THEY ARE HARMLESS!

      The fishing weight doesn’t move because it’s not in the way of the expanding gases, dipshit. Try taping them all over the surface of the bottle if you really believe the shit you just typed.

      Hey, though, here’s an idea to test your claim that won’t probably result in somebody getting seriously hurt or killed.

      The amount of force required to pop the 2 liter soda bottle is not powerful enough to propel a projectile to a significant amount of speed to cause any real damage.

      Take a marble or lead fishing weight small enough to fit into a large, long straw (such as the one from an empty pixie stick with both ends cut off). Put the weight into the straw, aim it at a nearby window, and blow as hard as you can into the straw.

      Now make a 2L bottle pop by blowing into it. I’m waiting...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    8. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The amount of force required to pop the 2 liter soda bottle is not powerful enough to propel a projectile to a significant amount of speed to cause any real damage.

      Let's see your math. How much force is necessary to pop a 2 liter bottle?

      It should be a simple experiment. Simply add increasing masses of CO2 to 2 liter bottles until they pop. Since you know the mass and the volume it's simple HS chemistry to figure out the pressures involved.

      Once you know the pressure, find the mass of the cap, and it's area to get the speed at which it could be propelled. Then we can rig up a little gun to shoot bottlecaps at you at that speed, and see if it does any real damage.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    9. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CO2 tanks are no fun. NO2 tanks on the other hand...

    10. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He didn't put it in a mailbox, did he? What makes you think the mother, who was supposedly supervising, would have let him do that, or put it where it would put anyone but himself in danger? Or was she not supervising? You can't have it both ways.

    11. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can walk into most grocery stores and purchase dry ice. At least you can here in Omaha, where this happened, (until they pass some stupid law because of this incident.)

    12. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by avandesande · · Score: 1

      How many children get maimed or killed on bicycles each year? Maybe we should take these away too- Think Of The Children!

      --
      love is just extroverted narcissism
    13. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But since a 14 year old can't exactly buy dry ice (at least not at the places I fill my CO2 tanks at) then she was supplying him- and if she wasn't supervising him doing this... there is a degree of recklessness that needs to be addressed."

      Ummm.. You can get it at the grocery store here in Florida.

    14. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by EllisDees · · Score: 1

      >But since a 14 year old can't exactly buy dry ice (at least not at the places I fill my CO2 tanks at) then she was supplying him- and if she wasn't supervising him doing this... there is a degree of recklessness that needs to be addressed.

      You can buy dry ice at the ice cream shop near here, and you don't need to be any age to do so.

      --
      -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
    15. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. This absurd recklessness needs to end. Cars kill thousands per year, they should be made illegal. Car dealers should be thrown in jail.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    16. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      There's a restriction that says you can't buy dry ice under age 18. Another one of the restrictions on science this country likes to keep making.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    17. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The straw allows the force to be applied to the weight over a long distance - F=ma, v=at. With the bottle, once the bottle is burst, the energy dissipates rapidly. This is why bombs are typically chemical in nature and you don't see suicide bombers running around with footpumps.

    18. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Fine. Tape the weights around the outside of the bottle, then, as I suggested in the beginning. It’s okay; the energy dissipates rapidly - you said so yourself. Make sure your face is no further than about 12” away when the thing goes off, too... you’re perfectly safe; the weights won’t move any more than five inches, remember!

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:SLightly more pressure than a balloon. by sjames · · Score: 1

      It would have been many times more constructive to explain to the mother just how badly a dry ice bomb can hurt someone and that it's illegal and leave it at that. She probably had NO idea just how much power a dry ice bomb can have. Involving the courts and claims of child endangerment is just senseless bullying.

      The choice was not between throw the book at mom and son or saying "Oh, OK, keep at it" There is a wide middle ground (rapidly becoming an abandoned wasteland) where most law enforcement action should actually be.

  39. I won't even comment on this... by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 1

    The Police should jail themeselves. Everywhere!

  40. Re:From the article. by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

    They ... detonated... a container full of dry ice? What's next, nuke Mars?

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  41. magnesium by AntEater · · Score: 1

    I recall getting hassled by the local cops when my cousins and I decided to ignite a strip of magnesium in an empty parking lot. You'd think we were loading sticks of dynamite in a van by the way the officer initially reacted. That was about 20 years ago. I'd probably be looking at charges if it were done today.

    --
    Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
  42. Re:Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe he did and got hit in the head a few times by shrapnel and as a result can't spell good anymore

  43. Talk Back by D66 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Criminal Division
    1701 Farnam Street
    Hall of Justice, Suite # 100
    Omaha, NE 68183
    (402) 444-7040

    In situations like this, public outcry and shame against those who infringe on freedom is a useful tool. Shame is underutilized as a form of social change. We should change that and complain to anyone connected with this charge. Loudly. So rather than posting here impotently, Call the Douglas County Attorney's office and state that this charge is an assault freedom

    1. Re:Talk Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid to actually write a letter. It might be a felony. Isn't there an email or something I can hide behind?

    2. Re:Talk Back by D66 · · Score: 1

      email means nothing.
      I called.

    3. Re:Talk Back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Omaha... This makes me cry...

  44. Things I did with my Dad .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here are just a few things I did with my Dad some 30 years ago, that might get both of us arrested today!

    1) Tennis ball cannon - used lighter fluid and the cans tennis balls came in along with some duct tape and a lighter - oh my!
    2) Collect hydrogen via electrolysis of water - filled garbage bag - set on fire to see it go whoosh!
    3) Potato gun - enough said with that one
    4) Learned to safely use a firearm and rabbit hunting (love rabbit stew) on public land
    5) Estes Rockets!
    6) and many experiments with chemistry sets that would NEVER be sold in this day and age!

    I feel so sorry for kids these days

  45. And lock up Mrs. Brady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the episode of the Brady Bunch where Peter made the volcano? And he bragged about lava oozing all over the place?

    He could have killed us all!

  46. Memo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you guys get this?

    MEMO:

    Dear Mrs/Ms/Mister Curious Person,
    Education is not for satisfaction of your personal curiosity, but merely to recite what's written on the textbooks authored by the knowledgeable authorities.
    Yours truly, The knowledgeable authorities.

    Oh, and think of the children too.

  47. Things just aren't the same... by Barloe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Man... I guess I there's a good point to having grown up in the 80's. I used to make pressure bombs with Drano and aluminum foil in Shwepps Club Soda bottles, drop chlorine tablets into mason jars of brake fluid, this dry ice stunt, nitric acid and sulphur mixes... played with a lot of black poweder and model rocket engines.... it all fueled my love of chemistry at a young age and I never had the cops appear. Have you seen the constituents of today's chemistry sets???? Pathetic. Is model rocketry with solid propellent engines still allowed as a hobby anymore? I was shocked to go to a Wal-Mart recently and discover they didn't sell Testor model paints!

    1. Re:Things just aren't the same... by jerry-VA · · Score: 0

      Yeah, a supervised childhood of structured "play" seems stultifying. Take a different path. Accumulate a carton of neat junk as you go through life. What seems to matter with kids is seeing what you enjoy doing, and hearing you question and laugh at authority figures, so your own kids will be OK. But your kids will be busy, so, when they bring the grandchildren over, tell them everything will be OK and get out the "Science Fun" carton. Pushing 70 now, plan seems 2B working so far.

      --
      Many are destined 2reason wrongly; others, not 2reason at all; and others, to persecute those who do reason. Voltaire
  48. Goddamn State nannies by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    Trying to disarm the populace and turn us into a nation of impotent pussies. Haven't they ever watched the documentary Red Dawn? The laugh it that they'll be first against the wall when the TerroCommies come for us.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Goddamn State nannies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Judging from your news, you are already a nation of impotent pussies. Obedient, anti-intellectual and fiercely patriotic slaves.

  49. Re:From the article. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    The right to bear arms should include the right to bear gas powered spinning steel blades !

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  50. Potato cannon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Someone built me a potato cannon. I took it to work to show off. Yeah, I work somewhere I could take it and it would be appreciated. Anyway, an hour after I get to work, Secret Service arrives outside. Swat parks their van out front. Cops are everywhere. Yes, I took it to work the day George Bush was scheduled to check into the hotel 100 ft away. Needless to say, I decided not to demo the cannon.

  51. Been going on a long time by Xel · · Score: 1

    First they came for the chemistry sets, and I did not speak up, because I was not a chemist.

    Then they came for the dry ice...

    --
    "Eagles may soar, but weasels dont get sucked into jet engines."
  52. yes, the government is corrupted by corporations by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    therefore, your task is to remove that corruption from government

    yet libertarian philosophy seems to seek to remove government itself, or whittle it down to ineffectiveness

    then what can stand between us and dominance by corporations?

    the idea is to repair the corporate infection of government, restore government as a bulwark against corporations, rather than what government has become: their tool

    yet libertarianism seems to desire to destroy government, thereby removing the only thing that can possibly protect us from corporate power

    let's put it this way: make a list of every abuse of government you despise. ok, when you whittle down government, every one of those abuses will still be committed, except by corporations, whom you have no recourse or control over, and then a whole new set of abuses will be visited on you, by entities completely unaccountable to you. that's reality

    libertarians seem to me to be very naive. i don't think they want the world to be a corporatocracy, they just don't understand that that that is what the real world effect of their naive belief system is

    you NEED a strong central government, or the power vacuum will be filled by corporations. its as simple as that, that's reality. try to square that with your ideological naivete, and evolve out of this juvenile, simplistic wish fulfillment that is libertarianism

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  53. Could be trouble by Itninja · · Score: 1

    These can actually be more dangerous when they don't go off as planned. There have been at least two little children in my county serious hurt because someone threw one of these into someone else's yard and drove off (probably as a prank). But there didn't go off. The next day (or days) as soon as the child touched then they exploded lacerating their faces.

    --
    I judt got a nre Kinesis keybiartf so please excusr ant egregiou typos.
  54. You have to ask? by Benfea · · Score: 1

    It wasn't that long ago that the cops shut down Boston over a Lite Brite.

  55. Boys and things that go BOOM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's see. When I was a kid (pre-teen), I made big booms by taking the powder from many small firecrackers and packing it into toilet paper tubes. They were great for ant hill demolition! Then when I was a teen I made bigger booms by making thermite and nitrogen tri-iodide bombs. The only kid I knew from then (in the 60's) that got arrested for making explosives (we were in AP chemistry together) was making nitroglycerin, and that was because he blew a big hole in the school parking lot. And they're arresting a kid and his mom for making dry ice bombs? It's a good thing we were living in a bit more permissive (and forgiving) society back then...

  56. damn you slashdot! by virtualXTC · · Score: 1

    Is this why my interns were trying to make dry ice bombs this morning!? The stupidity of people never stops amazing me; the interns were holding a capped tube with dryice and water front of their face with no safety glasses on giggling.

  57. Astounding Stupidity by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Our nation is in a fit of ignorance and this type of arrest is a great proof that only college graduates from highly accredited universities should be allowed to serve as police officers.
                        It is simply beyond all sanity that our society should be so squirreled up over explosives. Yes we did have a 9/11. And that has nothing to do with a kid with a firecracker or a plastic bottle filled with dry ice. Nor does it have anything to do with fireworks or a farmer blowing a stump out of his field. These ignorant cops and law makers might as well arrest themselves. After all, a car makes an explosion every time the piston is pushed down the cylinder. And teens and kids setting off explosives was an enjoyable and educational part of American life for centuries.
                      Freedom is taking a break in America. It may not return.

  58. If they can't learn it using cotton balls.... by tah9m9 · · Score: 1

    What's next? Felony for placing unopened cans of soda in the freezer? Removal of chemistry and physics from schools?... 'cuz anyone that knows anything about how electricity, magnetism and/or chemistry is clearly a threat to society. No dry ice bombs, but fireworks are legal! Me thinks "dangerous" entertainment is only allowed if there is a multi-billion dollar industry to back it.

  59. Overly broad laws meet lack of common sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A hammer is a destructive device too.

    Its disheartening when I see our legal system doing more actual damage to peoples lives than the origional "crime" could ever have reasonably hoped to accomplish. All the while there is no shortage of real criminals operating unimpeded.

  60. Turns out the NBA by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

    is in fact the National Bottle Association. And they run the country, so the cop is probably going to jail along with the state senators and governor for impinging on the kid's right to bare arms.

    --
    Nullius in verba
  61. Now She Knows to Give Him a Handgun Instead by careysub · · Score: 1

    Now there would have been no problem (in principle) with the boy making loud bangs - with a .357 magnum, since these are constitutionally protected. Take away the dry ice and give him a box of hollow points lady!

    --
    Starships were meant to fly, Hands up and touch the sky - Nicky Minaj
  62. When ignorant kids go intelligent... by tah9m9 · · Score: 1

    I blame the school system. This one in particular is not following the federal standard of keeping kids ignorant and passing them along from grade to grade with absolutely no ability to think for themselves. Kids with minds of their own! What is this country coming to? Someday our kids may start performing as well as other kids around the world - what an ugly world that would be. No, it's best to keep to the standard - jail parents and teachers for promoting curiosity and independence - it's the only way!

  63. Because they are freaking dangerous? by Snowhare · · Score: 1

    There is this mass group-think happening here were 99% of the posters say something about how it is just harmless fun.

    Well, it isn't. People get badly hurt by them. Esophageal injury from a plastic bottle containing dry ice. One of the children in this case nearly died. If you do a Google search for 'dry ice injury' or 'dry ice accident' you can find plenty. Such as this one from Dry Ice Experiments Feedback:

    I was reading your web page about the accident involving the dry ice and the loss of the woman's sight. On July 3, 1999 a similar accident happened in my family.
    My then three year old son was seriously injured, He lost one of his eyes, his right thumb was 75% severed and broken, his left thumb was 50% severed and he had a gash about 4 inches long on his stomach. I had also never heard of this and was mortified. My son is now doing wonderful and we are very vocal about it to let people know what can happen with what I found out after the fact to be called "dry ice bombs".
    Angela Hinkhouse

    Lots of accidents on video at YouTube.

    Yeah. All good harmless fun.

    Not.

    1. Re:Because they are freaking dangerous? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      It's all good, clean fun until you lose an eye; then it's just good fun.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:Because they are freaking dangerous? by JockTroll · · Score: 1

      One of the children nearly died? Well, nothing of value would have been lost anyway. In case you haven't noticed, kids aren't an endangered species. The world is full of the little shitters.

      --
      Geeks are so full of shit that "beating the crap out of them" takes a whole new meaning.
    3. Re:Because they are freaking dangerous? by russotto · · Score: 1

      ROTFL, are you practicing for a journalism career? Your first link is about people who put their mouth over the open end of a bottle with dry ice in it. If they weren't doing that they'd probably be sticking pencils in their eye or something.

    4. Re:Because they are freaking dangerous? by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      Erm, I don't think people here believe what they were doing was *harmless*. The prevailing, albeit unspoken, attitude seems to be that risk is a part of life; that we should recognise that fact but not allow it to get in the way of playing and learning. Learning to successfully negotiate risky situations is a much a part of learning as any of a million other life skills. In the situations that people have outlined, they've also learned more about chemistry, engineering, physics, electronics.

      Risk is ubiquitous, death is inevitable. Hysteria, on the other hand, is embarrassing.

      Everyone dies, unless you had other plans, and if you do, please, share.

    5. Re:Because they are freaking dangerous? by n6kuy · · Score: 1
      --
      If you disagree with me on social issues, then it's pretty clear that you are a narrow-minded bigot.
  64. Manhole Cover by BerryMadness · · Score: 2, Informative

    A childhood friend of mine lived at the end of a culdasac at the top of a hill with a manhole cover in the center. We must have been about 14 and had been lighting fireworks off for several years.

    We just discovered how awesome "Artillery Shells" are when you light them off but don't put them in the tube. One of us decided that we had to know what they sounded like when they exploded while in the manhole. So we proceeded to throw about 6-10 of them down there and they did sound really cool.

    My friends mom came home. Thank [deity of choice] that we ran out of artillery shells and had put the manhole cover back. We were just throwing bottle rockets and black cats down the little pry hole at this point. She exploded, no pun intended, on us and had a police officer come over and tell us: "If even the smallest spark got down there you would ignite the explosive sewer gas and blow the whole block up!" We tried not to laugh and rolled our eyes.

    Kids do stupid stuff

    It can't be summed up any better than that.

    1. Re:Manhole Cover by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      SO are you saying that it's impossible for a spark to set off built up sewer gasses?

      I'm not sure about sewer gasses itself, but we had a neighbor who would pore used motor oil down the sewer drain in the alleyway behind us then dump about half a gallon of gasoline in it to "break the oil up". Yea, I'm not saying he was intelligent or anything, just that he existed and did things. Anyways, had you been in my neighborhood, you could have set his concoction a blaze. In fact, this had happened once, the man hole covers for about two blocks shot close to 5 foot in the air. Cars ended up getting damaged as they either dodged the flying covers or fell into the open holes not noticing the missing covers.

      But that isn't the interesting parts, the explosion ended up creating a crack in the sewer line which then turned into a sink hole down the road a bit which took someone's garage with it when it collapsed some 5 years later.

      Of course this all happened when I was a kid so it was probably the late 70's or early 80's. I'm thinking the reason why the cop mentioned sparks and sewer gas is because there is a real threat that could cause harm to not just you, but others who are clueless of your actions. It may not have happened that time, but it doesn't mean it won't happen or never will. It's one thing to do something stupid that will only effect you, but it's another thing entirely to do something that has the potential of injuring or damaging someone or their property who is completely independent of your actions. Think of it this way, you could construct a race track with guardrails and fences all the way around it, blindfold yourself and drive a car on it. But do you think you would have just as much right to blind fold yourself and drive a car down I5 or I70 or something? How about down the street the high school is on when it's letting out? I guess what I'm saying is that if you were doing that in a squash culvert, it would be one thing as you would be the only people in range of it, but in a closed sewer system that connects to others, it's a little irresponsible given that something could happen. I'm sure you didn't drop any meters in to measure the air quality before setting them off.

  65. Re:From the article. by frist · · Score: 1

    There is no other way to get rid of it safely... Maybe if people actually found out what the article is talking about first, they wouldn't make asses of themselves. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dry_ice_bomb How else would you disarm it? That's part of the problem with a dry ice bomb. They can an do cause property and personal damage. This isn't a baking soda volcano.

  66. Re:yes, the government is corrupted by corporation by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    then what can stand between us and dominance by corporations?

    Us... There is only us.. and we are the ones who give corporations their power.

      ”We make the world we live in and shape our own environment.... The golden opportunity you are seeking is in yourself. It is not in your environment; it is not in luck or chance, or the help of others; it is in yourself alone."
    – Orison Swett Marden

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  67. It's a pretty powerful explosion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... as evidenced by this trash can being completely torn apart while someone's sitting on it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuYuXfRJmYM

  68. Re:yes, the government is corrupted by corporation by Ozeroc · · Score: 1

    Well put.

    --
    ...
  69. yes, us by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    through our tool, our democratically elected government

    duh

    as for us giving corporations their power, if a corporation does something you don't like, what do you do? how do exert influence over them? you write a nasty blog?

    no, your government REGULATES them

    what is the substance of your post exactly? wish fulfillment?

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:yes, us by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Well, we just have to make our government regulate them properly. It still comes down to us... Unless you think only a dictator or monarch can do it.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  70. really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    seems like an overreaction to me. has our society really gone from giving 14 year olds cherry bombs and m80's with no problem to charging them and their parent for overpressurizing a plastic bottle. i thought we lived in a free society. as long as he's not blowing up other peoples things and causing noise complaints it shouldn't be a problem. is it just because it can be potentially dangerous to himself? If we're using that reasoning, shouldn't we start arresting kids for climbing trees? then arrest them for making a camp fire in boy scouts? these are all potentially dangerous things but someone needs to draw the line. we can't start regulating peoples lives just for the reason that they could potentially hurt themselves. if someone wants to do something dangerous, ( cus dry ice bombs are SOOOOO dangerous) its their choice to make as long as its not putting other people in danger. Now, i have to go so i can shut off the power to my house before i get arrested for playing with electricity.

  71. And in other news.... by xmorg · · Score: 1

    Boy gets arrested for bringing a lego gun to school.

  72. AND LAWNMOWERS TOO! by petgiraffe · · Score: 1

    No kidding! And if you think a 6 foot cardboard tube with a few ounces of fuel in it is a public safety hazard what about LAWNMOWERS. Some of those things have 52 inches of spinning metal blades and are self-propelled. They're supposed to have "dead-man" switches on them, but those are annoying, easily disabled, and seldom work quickly anyhow. Think of all the horrifying disasters that might happen if people are allowed to continue using lawnmowers the same way they have been doing for decades! I think we can clearly make the case that lawnmowers should only be approved for use by trained professionals in closed, non-residential areas.

    --
    -- The reader anything less than completely failing to not misunderstand this sig is cursed.
  73. This is complete BS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was just mentioning this the other day to a couple people that I was considering doing this on the 4th of July as a way to get around the 'anti-fireworks' laws. Since fireworks are considered "explosives" and banned in our communist state of Kalifornia, then maybe we'll make some dry ice bomb, since those are damn loud and the police couldn't do anything about it, except maybe give me a ticket for loud noise, which is no big deal. Now I read that someone got charged with a FELONY??!!!?? WHAT??!!

    This charge is complete BS! I'm almost MORE tempted to try it now on the 4th of July. This is not a bomb as it DOES NOT HAVE IGNITION happening during the 'explosion'. It's only a build up and release of CO2, so it is the same priciple of over filling a balloon or tire or innertube or anything else too much until it pops. Dry Ice is nothing more than CO2, so it's not a 'substance used for building a bomb' or anything like that. In fact, it's the same damn gas you would be blowing out of your lungs into a balloon.

    Potatoe guns are only illegal if you have the kind that use an 'accellerant' and actual ignition to launch the projectile. It's perfectly legal to build and use a potatoe gun that uses compressed air. With that said, a BOTTLE WITH COMPRESSED AIR IS NOT A BOMB or exposive device.

  74. Destructive Device by neoshroom · · Score: 1

    The problem seems to be the law itself, namely outlawing possession of destructive devices.

    Practically anything can be interpreted to be a destructive device from a common lighter to a nuclear bomb. Hundreds of our laws are like this, being able to be twisted through interpretation to outlaw anything an authority feels like outlawing at a given moment. In practice this results in a state where anything could be illegal, especially anything that doesn't fit in or is different in any way, and encourages blind and unthinking submission to authority.

    --
    Big apple, new Yorik, undig it, something's unrotting in Edenmark.
  75. well then you're not really arguing with me by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    because you're not really a libertarian

    you're saying the same thing i am saying. so cheers to you, my friend

    let us beat back this dangerous libertarian horde of nitwits out to destroy the only tool we have against corporate power, and let us purge our government of the disease of corporate influence

    it won't be easy, but its the only way

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:well then you're not really arguing with me by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      We have to purge ourselves also, and stop buying every little piece of trash being pushed, use the plastic only when really needed, and don't run up a balance.. Clear all our personal debts. That's the real bear trap we stepped into. Buy locally made goods when possible. Get rid of the car... Boot out the bible thumpers. And of course, vote conscientiously. Ignore the bling. So many things where we can show our power regardless what the government does. I still consider that our own apathy is the single biggest thing we have to deal with. And the government is a reflection of this. In fact we are a positive feedback loop at this time. You leave it unsupervised, and this is the result.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    2. Re:well then you're not really arguing with me by mldi · · Score: 1

      General response to this thread...

      You're missing something: who watches the watchdogs? Another set of watchdogs? How about your government? How effective do you really think you are at turning over an established centralized government backed by military power funded by YOUR cash that you are required to give to them by law? Even in a well working democracy this is hard to do, much less a republic (well, what's left of it anyway).

      At least with corporations, you don't have to give them your cash. I don't see the translation of this "power vacuum" here. If anything I see it more directly controlled by the people with less bureaucracy, and then they wouldn't be propped up by government money either. Believe it or not, corporations can't just do whatever they please on their own. They're in it to make money, and generally, bad PR is bad for business, which translates to loss of power.

      Anyways, libertarianism isn't necessarily pro-capitalism. It's just super "let me do what I want personally". So, in this case, making a dry ice bomb.

      I'd also like to point out libertarian views range broadly. Ask 100 libertarians what they believe politically, and you'll get 100 different answers. The only core belief they all seem to have is being pro personal liberty.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  76. I can't believe it by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    Most of the comments reflect an astounding lack of understanding of the current state of the legal system in the US. You would think that people would finally have gotten it through their heads what the state of things are now, but apparently not.

    OK, so you have a kid making a semi-explosive device. That has a tendency to throw shrapnel around. Like fireworks, it makes a noise and is perfectly safe as long as everyone is a safe distance away. I want to stress everyone and safe distance. Unlike earlier in the 20th Century, it is today pretty difficult to find wide-open spaces without people. You can think you are out in the uninhabited desert and come across a bunch of people on ATVs. You can be in the woods and run into hikers. There just aren't a lot of places where there is nobody around anymore.

    Now suppose that everyone has been responsible and made sure that before such a device goes off that everyone is a safe distance away. Now some fool comes stumbling into the area and is injured. Guess what? They are going to sue someone. Actually, they are going to sue everyone they can think of that might have deep pockets. This will include the local police for not preventing such activities. It can include the school if information about such a device was passed around between students at the school. In short, today when someone is injured - especially a child - there is a huge incentive to sue because (amazingly) lawsuits work. You take a chance at winning the lottery and the family is set for life. Sadly the kid with only one eye lost something irreplacable, but everyone else is happy.

    The money awarded to the family isn't coming out of some magic box just for lottery ... er, lawsuit ... winners. It comes out of state and local governments, school systems and companies. This doesn't "teach anyone a lesson" nor does it do anything to prevent this sort of thing from happening in the future. What it does is cause financial havoc and that is about all. So of course the local police get the message real quick - better not let a lawsuit like this get started here.

    End result is obvious: the police are going to do everything in their power to minimize lawsuits affecting the state and local government and all associated organizations, like the school system. They will do this in an utterly ruthless manner because their very survival depends on being successful. Hence you have rather strong enforcement when someone does something that could, in someone's wild imagining, present grounds for a lawsuit.

    1. Re:I can't believe it by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Safe distance for these 'devices' is about 25 feet. There are plenty of parks and back yard or cul de sacs that do just fine. I have been 10 feet away AND hit by 'shrapnel' and while I felt t, it didn't even leave a red mark.

      The rest of your argument is a straw man not worth addressing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  77. You mean NaOH, not HCl by SkimTony · · Score: 1

    As it turns out, the replacement reaction between the Al3+ ions and the Na2+ ions is very exothermic, which causes the expansion of the water in the bottle, popping it.

    Ah, AP Chemistry...

    1. Re:You mean NaOH, not HCl by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      No, he means hydrochloric. It eats aluminum very rapidly and releases a lot of hydrogen gas.

      2Al + 6HCl --> 2AlCl3 + 3H2

      I know because I had the pleasure of watching someone pour concentrated muriatic acid into a foil catering pan (much thicker than normal aluminum foil). It was running out the bottom within seconds.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:You mean NaOH, not HCl by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      Ah. Different reaction, then. I guess kids blow up their soda bottles differently in different places. Thanks for the tip!

    3. Re:You mean NaOH, not HCl by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      P.S. Hydrochloric acid = toilet bowl cleaner, if you’re planning on doing your shopping at your typical run-of-the-mill Wal Mart.

      Hence the “Works” bomb: Works toilet bowl cleaner (HCl) and (aluminum, not tin) tinfoil.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:You mean NaOH, not HCl by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      As it turns out, the replacement reaction between the Al3+ ions and the Na2+ ions is very exothermic, which causes the expansion of the water in the bottle, popping it.

      Ah, AP Chemistry...

      I'm guessing you failed since, Na prefered ion is +1 hence NaCl rather than NaCl2 which is what a +2 cation would form with chlorine.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    5. Re:You mean NaOH, not HCl by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      No, I passed, but that was a long time ago, and I was thinking of a different ion as a wrote this. Thank you for pointing out my mistake.

  78. Didn't this use to be fun?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember being younger and building a few dry ice bombs, sparkler bombs, potato guns and what have you. Hell I might even have blown up a frog or two with M-80s. I believe this what we used to refer to as "fun", but I should probably look that up on wikipedia to be sure I wasn't really a terrorist.

    On the upside this article does make me want to have some kid's so I can be arrested when they scream to loud playing in the yard or get sued when they stick gum in someone's hair at school. Maybe I'll just lock them in a closet to be safe, I wouldn't want them to have any fun and make national news.

  79. I learned how to do that in summer camp as a kid by electrogeist · · Score: 1

    Also, The Works toilet cleaner + aluminum foil in a bottle. Just a few of the fun things we learned when signed up for the Science elective

  80. Dear /. Please by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Please, please post a follow up. Will it go to court? does it get laughed out of court?

    That will be the interesting story.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  81. Really? What about a panicked crowd? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harmless? What about the possiblilty of causing panic in the crowd and in thier panic there are injuries?

  82. don't play with cops, this is not a game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If a cop asks you to delete a picture you should politely refuse to comply. If the cop is insistent you should suggest he consult his supervisor and then refuse to cooperate further except where non-cooperation could appear as threatening. For example, if the cop says "ON THE GROUND MOTHERFUCKER!" you should quickly get on the ground. If you are physically assaulted, state loudly and as clearly as possible that you are not resisting and request that they stop hurting you.
    Also, it is very important to note any surveillance cameras which may be in the vicinity and to request that any witnesses record what is happening.
    Above all, remain as calm as possible and never forget that standing up to tyranny is the greatest duty of every American.

  83. I'm normally fairly articulate... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    ...but I find that I cannot express my opinion of Mr. Wells without resorting to obscenity.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  84. I had the problem by AnAdventurer · · Score: 1

    I took a picture of a line and poster one the wall in Wells Fargo. There was a huge line and ONE teller and the poster had a happy customer with a slogan like: "we like to be quick about your business". Right way an asst manager who was not helping anyone roared out "hey, you can't take pictures in here, Delete it right now!" I was of course emailing it to myself at that moment. "Sorry to late" Oh and she got mad. She said "I could call the police on you, you can't take photo's in here" "Really there is no sign, and why can't I?, I have been coming in this branch for 6 years, I have both personal and business accounts. I could walk though here blind folded. Go ahead ask me how many stanchions are behind me, and how many feet from the last one to the door". I did not move out of line, she ran off and got the bank manager who could see she was just being pissee asked me half heartedly if he could please see what I took a photo of. I show him and he shipishly asked that I refrain from taking photos in the bank. The cow that started it sniply called out "I ask before I take photos somewhere" I responded "I do not". And I went about my banking business. She does not work there any more.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  85. Criminalization by jerry-VA · · Score: 0

    A mother has been charged with a felony because her child was making dry ice bombs in soda pop bottles.

    I applaud and support mother and child against somebody's attempt to jump-start a law enforcement career in anti-terrorism..

    After I learned about getting water to conduct electricity by adding salt, and that with the conduction of electricity you could get electrolysis, and electrolysis turns H20 water molecules back into the original H2 hydrogen gas and oxygen gas, I got the gases. First I got them separately and verified there was always about twice as much hydrogen at the negative electrode as oxygen at the positive, so the formula for water, H2O, checked out. I couldn't get enough hydrogen to make a Hindenberg-type balloon (much lighter than helium, too bad). Now I know how to build the power supplies so I wouldn't use up batteries. Bring on the grandchildren! Failing a balloon, I next released both the H2 and the O2 into a single Coke bottle (I used upside-down Coke bottles filled with water to collect the bubbles). Of course, the proportions were perfect to make water, because they came from water -- the perfect mixture for an explosion. I lit the gas and got a neat, almost musical "Pop!!" from the Coke bottle. I was about 12. My childhood had its happy times, and somehow I survived it..

    The ensuing research career was not successful, in that I never got academic tenure, but it brought me to great people at wonderful institutions around the world, and I enjoyed it with all the same enthusiasm and hunger to see for myself how things really worked, something now stifled by criminalization in the reported family. --jerry-VA

    --
    Many are destined 2reason wrongly; others, not 2reason at all; and others, to persecute those who do reason. Voltaire
  86. Caver's and carbide bombs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Probably makes my (and friends) younger days as cavers (spelunkers to those of you across the pond) very iffish. We used calcium carbide (generating acetylene) helmet lamps (believe me, low tech is *good* when you are thrutching and bouncing through tight limestone passages, immersed in cold fast flowing streams and squeezing through and generally covered in mud). Given the authorities' predilections today, I am not going to give details, other than to say the obvious, making carbide bombs is not difficult.

    Go off with a bit more of a bang though - one of my caving friends made one to show off; blew the friend he was showing off to across the small backyard and shattered every window in the back of the house (luckily the experience was just expensive, nobody was injured). He thought that he could get away with not telling the rest of us in the caving club; however given that the friend blown across the yard was a member of the climbing club, and that I had friends in said club, we had a fair degree of amusement catching the miscreant by surprise and quizzing him in the pub about it......

    Disclaimer - don't try it, they are actually quite dangerous, and will likely get you into trouble.

  87. I AM MAKING SOME NOW by moxley · · Score: 1

    Dry ice in a plastic bottle with water is NOT a "destructive device." It's a fucking science experiment.....

    This is utterly ridiculous. Yes, it makes a loud noise - so do all of the other methods of popping a plastics bottle.

    Now, if he were putting these on unsuspecting people's doosteps, that would be problematic....

    To prove my point I am making some now..RIght now, at 2:19pm, in downtown Philly....Now all of you who have read this are aware, and though I am not a minor, your silence (or comments) obviously indicate tacit approval...If you disapprove, that can be conveyed by doing something other than commenting or not commenting....

    While I do see the issue with making these things, particularly if care isn't taken when placing them, but they are not bombs...Like anything else involving science (or REALITY), carelessness can lead to injury, but this is NOT something his mother should be charged with a FELONY for.......I would urge everyone to contact the department that some thoughtful individual listed above in the thread.

    1. Re:I AM MAKING SOME NOW by PPH · · Score: 1

      Dry ice in a plastic bottle with water is NOT a "destructive device." It's a fucking science experiment.....

      In related news, the US falls further behind the rest of the world in science education.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:I AM MAKING SOME NOW by moxley · · Score: 1

      ...and math, and most everything else...

  88. Let me tell you about a WORKS bomb by moxley · · Score: 1

    If you enjoyed the dry ice overpressurizing a bottle until it pops, you'll LOVE this:

    http://www.metacafe.com/watch/307550/how_to_make_a_works_bomb/

  89. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  90. Re:From the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A projectile propelled by the force of explosive powder is considered a gun. Everything else is not ;)

  91. Re:From the article. by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    You mean like unscrewing the top of the container off?

    While it’s under pressure and liable to pop at the slightest disturbance? Let me guess... you also check roman candles that fail to ignite by visually inspecting the inside of the tube?

    The other guy on here was correct: You pop it with a BB gun from a safe distance.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  92. I have a published story in RL about that... by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

    We took a supersoaker intake hose, fitted it to a bottle of standard butane held on w/ a washer and DuctTape.

    The supersoaker valve was never intended to hold back that kind of preassure so we in essence created a "pilot light." OMG when we pulled the trigger it looked like the movies!

    Cost: $50 USD. Fear Factor? 100% I've never seen a flame that big since (not counting t.v.)

    --
    How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  93. Re:yes, the government is corrupted by corporation by eightball · · Score: 1

    Most of corporation's power comes from government, not despite it.

  94. Re:yes, the government is corrupted by corporation by eightball · · Score: 1

    Threshold too high..

    You have the option of dealing with which corporations you wish to do business with. The government is not optional, it is at best slightly changeable.

    If a corporation violates your rights*, that is a good place for the government to step in. For example, if corporation destroys your property, they are just as liable as an individual that does the same.

    *no, not violate your sense of moral outrage

  95. Correction by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    Correction: The globalists found oil in Omaha and now distribute made up stories in the "liberal media" about weapons of mass destruction there, to get approval to start a war... also they meet in bilderberg to plan (nearly) complete extinction of mankind

    well yes, I am Alex Jones. How'd you know?

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  96. ATF defn. of a destructive device excludes this by AwesomeAvacado · · Score: 1

    The ATF definition of a destructive device includes the following caveat: The term "destructive device'' shall not include any device which is neither designed nor redesigned for use as a weapon

  97. what is this garbage by luther349 · · Score: 0

    i used to set these off all the time as a kid. theirs not a dammed thing destructive abought them. they just make a loud sound. just tosses some water and dry ice around a bit. and if you live by a lake that make cool dept charges hehe catch some fish easy with explosions. i hope this bs charge gets drooped when they go to court. even if it blew up the kids face it wouldn't hurt him. nothing pisses me off more when i see these story's kids experimenting with siance and you get bs charges by cops. like i said cops can trump up all the stupid charges they like i just hope there judge is down to earth and tosses the case before it goes anywhere.

  98. so the cops built some dry ice themselves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What I find so stupid about this is the cops said they found an ice bomb and detonated it. Translation; So the cops built a dry-ice bomb themselves and set them off.

  99. Google streetview by francoisroux · · Score: 1

    I suppose these guys haven't checked out Google Streetview yet. That has just about everything photographed you can possibly think of, and I'm sure there are a bunch of Amtrak trains in their pictures. Wonder who's going to get harassed over those? No wait, everyone who looks at the pictures might get into trouble... Shit, shouldn't be giving them any ideas here... Luckily, living at the bottom tip of Africa, you can take photos of anything. You may even take photos of the president and his cavalcade. Your just not allowed to take photographs of said while flipping them off. It's ok to photograph them, or to flip them of, but not both at once because that's seen as a threat. I kid you not...

  100. Police in New Zealand are a bit more chilled by dingram17 · · Score: 1

    Two stories: First one: Friends of mine worked in the theatre game and would often have left over dry ice from shows. After one show closed they were setting off dry-ice bombs at a party. Apparently one went off just as a taxi drove past, and the driver feared for his safety so called the cops. A policeman turned up, wanted an explanation, and a demo was arranged. It took some time for the bottle to go off, and when it did the cop was quite alarmed. His response: don't do them after 10pm.

    Second one: same friend's father works for the forensic science people. A person was charged with blowing things up with CO2 bombs and they were trying to replicate the device. The suspect claimed to get them to go off after 15min, but the scientists were not getting them to go within 45min. Son said to Dad: you need to add water to the dry ice. Difficult silence followed.

    When burying bottle bombs, make sure it isn't next to the rooster that was dispatched a week earlier. GF and her father (now wife and father in law) found that was a bit yucky.

    Search on YouTube for 'Frozen Explosions' for some fun with CO2 bombs, including in a swimming pool and launching drum lids

  101. Re:Sounds familiar.(but excessive) by vortexau · · Score: 1

    You do not need "range" capability or rocket fuel to hurt people:
      http://www.parliament.nsw.gov.au/prod/parlment/hansart.nsf/V3Key/LA20080516011

    "Crimes Amendment (Rock Throwing) Bill 2008
    But rock throwing, which causes great harm to people—Nicole Miller, for example, suffered brain damage when a man threw rocks from a bridge at the car in which she was a passenger—gets no mention at all. - throw a rock from a height at a vehicle it could kill someone—in fact, it could kill many people if it causes a crash in which a bus is overturned -"

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  102. Not the first time... by ujoronen · · Score: 1

    I am concerned for what we are becoming. The US is leading the way, but it is certainly not an exclusively American phenomenon. While our educational system teaches to the lowest common denominator, the public is lulled to sleep by the mediocrity of their existence. Where someone rises above the median, they are punished and ostracised by societies leaders and their hired thugs who change the popular opinions and even meanings of words to suit their interests. This has happened before, but we call those the dark ages. I guess we should be glad they aren't burning people at the stake yet.

    Perhaps it is time to hide what we truly are and experiment in secret. Given that these events are cyclical in nature, we can simply sandbag our findings until the public is once again interested in taking steps forward. This too has been done before, though the media has sensationalized the history. The world's best and brightest working in secret with a society bent on ignorance at all costs, including the life and liberty of those great minds. Perhaps it is time to build an intellectual subculture, after all, most of it is already there.

  103. When I was a kid, we used to make REAL explosives by jbarr · · Score: 1

    As a science-oriented kid back in the 1970's living in rural America, we used to do all kinds of stuff that, today, would no doubt land us in jail in a heartbeat.

    We used to make homemade gun powder, pack it into pill bottles, and blow 'em up in various configurations. We'd pack it tighter or looser and vary the ingredients causing the explosions to go from a loud "bang" to a cool mushroom smoke cloud. And of course, adding some magnesium made for a bright show.

    And we'd take chunks of sodium (weren't science classes fun back in the day?!?) and drop it in swimming pools or lakes and watch the fun.

    I doubt kids today even know what are the components of gun powder. Not necessarily because they don't know the chemistry, but it's just not Politically Correct to even think about gun powder anymore.

    --
    My mom always said, "Jim, you're 1 in a million." Given the current population, there are 7000 of me. God help us all!
  104. That's why I never told my mom until after... by rthille · · Score: 1

    That's why I never told my mom until after the explosions, when I was asking her to call the fire department...

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  105. Justice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mom should be charged. Who lets their 14 year old play with bombs. This dry ice website talks about how dangerous those things can be. If you know your kids is going to do it and you let them and they get in trouble... you deserve to be punished.