Slashdot Mirror
Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award
An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes "'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime. ... In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't 'cause' her autism, but 'resulted' in it. It's unknown how many other children have similar undiagnosed mitochondrial disorders. All other autism 'test cases' have been defeated at trial. Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.' How did this happen when all the scientific data points otherwise?"
Is it April Fools day already?
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
If you ever wondered why drug companies would rather work on yet another allergy medication instead of vaccines with a much bigger potential to help people, well, look no further.
My doctorb has proof that I have a previously unknown mitochondrial disorder that does not cause, but results in, a deep-seated need to receive large quantities of money.
$2.2 billion dollars would be appreciated as compensation.
Does this mean the mystery about the cause of autism is solved?
Seems like copy and paste can sometimes do more harm than good. Seems like copy and paste can sometimes do more harm than good.
As was noted in the article, the girl had an underlying condition which the vaccine aggravated. It was a very specific case.
This does not validate the views of the anti-vaccination brigade.
> How did this happen .... ?
Every time you go to court, there will be a certain amount of randomness in the outcome, because the legal system isn't run by mathematical logic, it is run by humans (lawyers, judges, juries) and they are notoriously unpredictable.
You are versed in all Scientific studies on the subject of Vaccination and Autisim?
I truly feel for people who have complications as the result of taking any medicine, but if you consider the vast numbers of people who receive vaccinations with no issues at all, the side-effect cases are extremely minute. Like everything else the American health care system ails from these days, all these successful lawsuits will do is push researchers and pharmaceutical companies to cease development and production of vaccinations as their insurance rates etc go up. Only when people have to see their child die from what would have been an easily prevented disease, or watch his/her body broken by something like polio, will they realize how much vaccines are needed and how f'ed up our lawsuit happy country has gotten.
All other autism 'test cases' have been defeated at trial. Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.' How did this happen when all the scientific data points otherwise?"
I'm certainly not a doctor and may be misunderstanding this, but the way i think of it is this: when you execute someone, you provide with them a "lethal dose" of poison. In reality, there is no such thing as a "lethal dose", but rather it's defined as something that is 99.9999% (or whatever) percent likely that you'll kill someone given his/her physical conditions. Yet naturally, some survive - but that doesn't make it any good for you. Same with vaccination: yes, some rare people may have developed some condition that counteracts the benefits of the vaccines, but that doesn't mean it's bad for you.
So, ultimately, this in itself doesnt contradict previous studies - in this case we're dealing with an isolated case (the so-called statistical "outlier"), whereas before you were (presumably) dealing with a random selection of individuals, representative of the general population
what really concerns me more, however, are the possible repercussions of this asinine decision. They get so obsessed over isolated cases that they completely neglect the larger picture. To quote another poster:
If you ever wondered why drug companies would rather work on yet another allergy medication instead of vaccines with a much bigger potential to help people, well, look no further.
Yes, but a simple re-read of your post before submitting it should alleviate this kind of error from appearing in the main post. It seems some /. contributors are too lazy for that step though.
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
The initial payment covers life care, and then there's a yearly sum on top?
Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
Five years later, the government settled the case before trial and had it sealed.
In just about every way imaginable, this is the wrong thing to do. We're now going to have more fear-mongering about vaccines with everyone pointing at this case, and because it's sealed, no-one will know why.
It sounds terrible that vaccine + undiagnosed mitochondrial disorder can result in autism, but what happened should be open so that we can learn from it.
Way to find a way to stretch this into an attempt to start yet another healthcare flamewar on slashdot.
Personally, I think I'll abstain, and not take your very obvious bate. I'll continue finding this settlement flat out absurd, but for none of the strawman reasons you suggest. I do not deserve that kind of money for a bullshit 'medical accident', and neither do they.
"linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
No-one's complaining about that. There's a difference between looking after those in need and backing down in a case about vaccines. I have no problem with a government supporting her. I have a problem with a government settling a lawsuit over the vaccines being the problem, and sealing it, rather than winning the vaccine case and then paying separately.
You know that Mad Mel in the Daily Mail will jump all over this case and the whole MMR bullshit will kick off again and children will suffer from diseases that the population used to have hive immunity from.
Right. All that documented history of vaccines wiping out smallpox, and nearly wiping out polio, and all those mountains of empirical evidence showing no correlation between vaccines and autism really suggests that we can't trust vaccines. Gotcha.
"linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
Anyone who can be irked to actually research it. These things are highly scrutinized by countless people during their development process. You might not understand it, but that doesn't mean you should try to burn it for being a witch.
"linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime.
more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetimee
Do the affects of this vaccine also include repeating the same text on Slashdot, or is that the 'result'?
But there is no greed in Star Trek, and no psychopaths in power and no survival of the sneakiest doctrine in effect at all times.
-FL
I beg to differ. Q was definitely a psychopath if I ever saw one
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Sorry for asking dumb questions, but who will pay?
And let me add, whatever weasel words you may want to use, that the decision can only be considered reasonable if you believe that without the vaccine the girl would be better. So they are effectively saying that the vaccene is the cause or probable cause of the current situation. When whoever has to pay fights this decision back it should be easy to have it overturned.
Moreover this just makes everyone angry. It would be undestandable if they made the guilty party pay whatever future expenses may occur. Fixing a price, any price, on the condition is crazy. What if expenses become higher? lower? What if she is cured?
And, of course, it is open to abuse.
On the other hand this is the first dupe in the summary I've seen in over a decade...
(which I hope does not come true). This will lead to further scaremongering and the vaccination rate will drop to a new low, leading to a another surge in some of the awful childhood diseases that have until recently been all but eradicated in western societies.
If causing autism for some children were a side effect of vaccination (for which no evidence exists), the benefits of vaccination still outweigh the damage by a lot. Let my friends Penn and Teller explain it in a bit more graphic way ...
karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
Hey, there are stuff in there with many letters and more than 3 syllables. Many of them contain Duhydrogen monooxide, which is a known "bad stuff". Anything with that many letters must be bad.
Oh, and on a more serious note:
chances are with a few minutes of research you are smarter than your doctor...
You might be smarter than your doctor, but I assure you that even after an hour of intensive googling, he is better informed than you are in medicine. Yes, you should not blindly do whatever the doctor says - you should ask questions, ask for a second/third/... opinion, research for yourself, etc. But to think that after a few minutes' research you would be more knowledgeable than him is a bit insulting.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
Is it normal for the-government-as-defendant to seal a case after settling? If this action is not standard procedure, then it suggests the presence of findings the government didn't want revealed publicly.
'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
But a rational examination and sifting through all the mountains of history and empirical evidence tells us that we simply cannot trust the people who make, promote, sell and administer these drugs.
No. The history and empirical evidence is that vaccines work very well, with very few side effects.
But I assure you that you will see it again soon. again.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
There are book authors, researchers, and television commentators who build their entire careers on the fears of parents.
When someone, anyone, comes along and offers a cut-and-dried explanation to a common problem ("Tour child is autistic? It was vaccines!"), they cling to the idea. The author/commentator/researcher has given them a target for their fears and misunderstandings. Like and angry lynch mob, they will accept the first target they can, regardless of the facts. They are blinded by their desperation to know what went wrong with their child's health, and their threshold for truth is set very, very low.
I think you meant herd immunity in the last sentence, but other then that I agree with you completely.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
Oh the irony!
I got moderated as redundant. By the Department of Redundancy Department no doubt.
I got moderated as redundant. By the Department of Redundancy Department no doubt.
How ironic is that?
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
I think you meant herd immunity [wikipedia.org] in the last sentence, but other than that I agree with you completely.
FTFY
Ask me about repetitive DNA
chances are with a few minutes of research you are smarter than your doctor...
A little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing...
You know what is ironic? That you use "ironic" when something is not ironic and your sig is:
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Pointing out a redundency and being singled out as redundant yourself is either unfitting (if your view is in fact insightful) or deserving (if someone thinks that it was so obvious, that your post was not needed).
P.S. I know a case can be made to this being in fact irony. In that case, my post is ironic, but I will go with the conservative view of irony for the purpose of this comment.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
No, I meant hive immunity. Measles affects Borg cubes as well ;)
If you don't like it, get yourself a nationalised health service.
Gee, thanks for that helpful advice!
Actually, I was going for funny.
But I guess my sense of humor is a bit too dry and laced with sarcasm today. Or perhaps it is not appreciated all that much by the crowd that gets drawn to this "serious" topic.
An interesting thing to note though is that although, as you say...
Pointing out a redundency and being singled out as redundant yourself is either unfitting (if your view is in fact insightful) or deserving (if someone thinks that it was so obvious, that your post was not needed).
...the redundancy is so obvious. And yet here we are more than two hours later and it still exists in the main post. Obviously, it isn't obvious enough to have gotten corrected yet, despite numerous people pointing it out in the comments.
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Correct, Thanks. And I thought I got the handle on all the "than vs. then" issue.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
The following article from the New England Journal of Medicine has a good summary of why the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program exists, and why some of its recent decisions, including the award in the Poling case, have been problematic. Basically, since 2005 the policy has been to concede cases where petitioners establish a plausible theory by which their injury could have been caused by the vaccine, rather than requiring proof or even scientific evidence that the vaccine caused said injury.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp0802904
See also the Wikipedia article on the program, which also discusses the Poling case.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaccine_court
I myself had serious side-effects of vaccinations traced to my school performance throughout grade-school. Other friends and family of mine immediately noticed their slightly "detached" or whimsical inability to concentrate without linking it to the vaccines. In the case of myself and some relatives, when the nurse or doctor says you are "behind" in your vaccinations then they just start injecting you with it all at once expecting your body's immune system to just adapt all at once with little close-contact study. All the vaccination complications and death have been linked to the host having a low Vitamin D3 content in their body. The main complication is auto-immune response to your own bodyily organs and nerve channels that it causes your brain to simply disable, immune system to degrade the myolin sheaths insulating nerves, unusual food allergies, random organ failure, metabolic changes, mutations, and a number of combinations of these complications in the right order is just like that final bricke a game of tetris that can knock-off all your blocks. In my case, I have amnesia in certain circumstances, over the course of a 2-year period my heart detectable stopped 3 times to my immediate knowledge and I thank the Unknown for it starting again in each instance, and an entire slew of others just from doctors thinking our body is like a Windows Operating System that can accept any patch they give without reading the lengthy disclaimer and anomalies. My nearest of kin was always having seizures and such throughout his childhood and nothing scared the shit out of us as witnessing it after concluding until 3am on a halloween night drive to another state for festivities.
Some friends and family allowed tests to be performed similar to an MRI, while induced into the sleep-levels where these seizures arrived from, and the scans show all kind of unsual nervous system activity that should otherwise be the "rest" and "re-calibrating" cycles associated with the sleeping cycles. In terms of remedy against vaccines, we make the mistake in calling them just that when they are in-fact nothing more than Innoculations regardless of what someone's propoganda asserts as being a "weakened strain" of a deadly parasitic organism. It boils down to this: is your diet so poor that your bodily PH-level is at a low number that makes every cell on your body receptive to a virus penetrating it's wall, are you not wearing a static-charge device to electrify your blood, are you not giving your body immediate immunte system feedback and anti-gen reclaimation in avoiding small amounts of your urine with your daily water ration? If you want to catch the diseases in a controlled environment, then get Innoculated, otherwise don't eat the junk food and keep your PH level of your body high with plenty of propery oxygen therapies and urine therapies and lymph-channel massage therapies.
The Innoculations are just to divert the complication of an immediate unregulated infection from diverting your time from crucial work, and as the case with children we see that it's the compelled association to fellow classmates of otherwise "squallid" origin that are a vector, and that itself to disuade from compelled association and coerced contract is a divine providence that Home Schooling resolves to keep the many micro-cultures of neighboring populations from just being a relay of Medical Service workers becoming carriers.
Well, you got my +1 funny mod. I enjoyed your post (again and again). /. overlords have seen this thread and do not want to change the main post so as to not make this thread irrelevant to future generations.
Actually, it might be that our
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
But since they have some problems with social skills from the get go, I do not think that autism is such a problem for them.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
Maybe it was written by someone with autism.
Ah yes. That must be it. Redundant, but at least not irrelevant.
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
is why we will never get a cure for cancer or anything else. 10 people out of 1000 died because they had an allergic reaction to the 'the cure'. But millions of lives are saved. BUT GOD FORBID THOSE 10 PEOPLE DIED. I hate being a part of the human race sometimes. The things that prevent thousands of dying from polio, or mumps, or measles. Those 3 idiots sue everyone and make medical costs go through the roof. Their snowflake died. OH NOES. Let's dial back time to the cave man days. Squirt out your puppy without anything. In this day and age, without all these shots they'll sue. Give them the shots that prevent premature death, they'll sue. Squirt out your snowflake and it dies in a car accident because you didn't properly secure it in a car seat in a car accident. It's not YOUR OWN DAMN FAULT. It's the car, or car seat manufacturer, or McDonald's or AT&T because the coffee was too hot, or you HAD to txt back your BFF. Welcome to Idiocracy. The future is now. Nothing is your fault. The gene pool needs a lot more bleach. I'm personally going to recommend Napalm. Hell I'd even godwin this one. It's time.
Tiresome of me to point it out, I know, but I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Really.
Recently on Penn & Teller's Bullshit, how the anti-vaccination movement is bullshit.
Part 1/2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aky-sRri-NQ
Part 2/2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gnxci5tezZY
I strongly suggest you have a look at it.
shit I mean there could be motherfucking MAGNETS in there gotta watch out
...in the hope that they, too, have this disorder.
No sig today...
In order to preserve the relevance of the redundancy threads, the original /. post is quoted below...
Science: Family To Receive $1.5M+ In Vaccine-Autism Award
Posted by timothy on Saturday September 11, @03:54AM
from the welcome-to-a-jury-of-your-peers dept.
An anonymous reader, quoting from CBS News, writes
"'The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim is a big one. CBS News has learned the family of Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime. more than $1.5 million dollars for her life care; lost earnings; and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah's care. Those familiar with the case believe the compensation could easily amount to $20 million over the child's lifetime. ... In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't 'cause' her autism, but 'resulted' in it. It's unknown how many other children have similar undiagnosed mitochondrial disorder. All other autism 'test cases' have been defeated at trial. Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.' How did this happen when all the scientific data points otherwise?"
This way things are even more redundant....heheheh!
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
Maybe I should also copy paste all the comments into my post, including my own, thus earning a +1 Recursive, which is way more honorable than +1 Redundant.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
I'm taking estradiol valerate for hormone replacement therapy. Now it's quite possible that I might have some undiagnosed predisposition to breast cancer or some other disease that is dependent on estrogen or even just the compounds used in its delivery, but if this turns out to be the case I'd be a bloody fool to start suing people for it, because it's not as if I would have gone without the medication if I knew there was a 1 in 10.000 chance it could kill me. No, seriously, between people smoking, driving without a seatbelt and eating garbage, I just don't believe that any rational person would abstain from important medical treatment due to a very minor chance of complications, unless of course they've been pressured to do so by the kind of fear mongering nonsense you've seen against the MMR vaccine.
Greed is good. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RWsx1X8PV_A
Wow!
I wish I had moderation points and I wish I could dump them all on this post to make it +5 funny.
You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.
But hey, have you seen those motherfucking MAGNET BRACELETS they sell at the mall/flea markets? They're supposed to cure anything. So therefore, if I have magnets flowing through my blood, the effects should be even stronger!
Sign me up!
That's right, doctors never read the warnings before injecting someone with a substance. Good job you thought about doing that! Say, who do you think writes those warnings?
So quick, does anybody know the secret recipe to having an autistic kid? Cause I could use a few extra bucks courtesy of the american taxpayer right about now.
is slashdot getting so bad that we're skipping duping an article in another article and just duping them within the same article?
I had a hard time reading that article because of the I had a hard time reading that article because of the repetition.
that they know is dangerous
BZZZT Wrong. Please keep your fiction off /.
If you had super powers, would you use them for good, or for awesome?
Fuckin MAGNETS!!! How do they work??? Miracles!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-agl0pOQfs
I find it odd that the decision was based on the fact that Hannah had an "unknown mitochondrial disorder". Is it known that she has *some* mitochondrial disorder, but not specifically what? TFA doesn't say.
But anyway. There is another dynamic at play here. And that is that parents of disabled children have such a hard time getting help. Autism is horrible that way. So, while it's easy to vilify the parents for appearing to abuse the system, they probably feel, with justification, that the system has abused them. Most people in their position just roll over and don't fight; they cope as best they can.
If a society places any particular value on people that chose to have children (and there are reasons to do so), then there has to be some assurance that society, which benefits from children, will commit to meaningful help when things take a turn for the bad. As things stand now, parents can see their entire future slip away if something goes wrong with their kids. If we collectively decide that the risk is completely on parents who chose to have kids then I have to recommend that nobody have kids. You can lose everything.
Equine Mammals Are Considerably Smaller
Get them vaccinated! Duh!
Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
According to the fine article the case was settled. There was no trial. There was no jury. This is what the government agreed to in order to avoid a trial.
They're not fecking stocks, ruled by brownian motion and the machinations of a shadowy, powerful group of elite monkeys.
The diseases they prevent aren't gone, merely suppressed. If you stop suppressing them, they'll come right back to the levels they had before.
And the only way in which the vaccines are different is that about 30 years ago, they removed the junk in them that the hysterical antivaccinites were claiming causes autism, with no effect on the actual autism rates...
Can you be Even More Awesome?!
Minors and mentally incapacitated adults who are awarded large damage awards for health care should be assigned a neutral financial guardian to make sure the award goes to its intended purpose and that no third party benefits unless that benefit is an inherent side effect of the treatment for the beneficiary. For example, if the beneficiary gets a wheelchair-accessible van, it's okay for the rest of the family and other third parties to benefit from having a van.
Anyone family member, anyone who would have been financially impacted by person's care absent the award, and anyone living in the same household should not be eligible due to an obvious conflict of interest.
Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
Yes, but they have a much more "effective" solution to individual choices to abstain from vaccination affecting the hive.
Come play Moral Decay!
Which basically shows that a trial probably would have been even more expensive.
Our tax dollars at work, paying off nutcases $20,000,000 to avoid a $10,000 trial. Brilliant.
(Yes I pulled that trial cost right out of my ass, but I doubt it would be anywhere near the 20 mil they settled for)
This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
What exactly is the anti-vaccinationists' expertise in this field?
--
"Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
"Open source is evil." - Microsoft
But today's vaccines are not "different", so what is the issue?
Assuming companies properly follow all safety procedures when developing and testing drugs, and assuming they disclose known problems within an appropriate window, companies should not be held liable for their products. While I hate arguments by analogy, this is truly akin to holding a construction company liable for a bridge collapsing after it was struck by a missile, or an earthquake rated 9.9 on the Richter scale. The company had no control over these unforeseeable events, and to make them liable makes all new product development a much riskier and costlier endeavor, to the detriment of society as a whole.
Higher Logics: where programming meets science.
Yes, that's it! Everyone wants the big payout, so they'll get their kids vaccinated. Ha! That'll show the medical industry! Soon our kids will be immune to all kinds of diseases and live longer and healthier lives! Oh, wait...
Not only that, but most of us pediatricians who have to deal with these vaccination fear-mongers every day have actually spent a great deal of time reading about vaccination issues simply because it comes up all the time and it's nice to be able to quote the relevant studies.
Funnily enough it's a synonym of the correct word. So it does mean exactly what he thinks, yet is still wrong.
Ah, English. :)
source wikipedia: In 1988, the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) went into effect ... [victims] were compensated with awards totaling $903 million.
Everyone is told they are safe, but like it or not, millions and millions are paid out to children that were injured by vaccines. I've actually done some research into this and it is pretty hard to win a vaccine injury claim, contrary to what some say in some later posts. Everyone in the vaccine chain is pretty defense and tend to blame a problem on everything but the vaccine.
Doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, religion destroys spirituality
I would have to strongly state that researching your illnesses on your own is extremely important, especially if you are dealing with a chronic condition. While there are some hypochondriacs out there, there are also a huge number of mediocre doctors who either have ego problems where they cannot admit they don't know what the issue is or disaffected, disconnected doctors who don't feel like dealing with anyone who has anything more complex than a cold or the flu. Usually the result is that the doctor tells you it's all in your head and to see a shrink. That gets you out the door and hopefully never returning to their office as you'd be a drain on their time, energy & the clinics profits. This can be repeated over and over again, the more esoteric or complex your condition is the higher the noise to signal ratio is going to be as you find out that most docs are akin to India based technical support. I.e: Follow the flowchart, if flowchart doesn't cover it, either disconnect outright or annoy customer so much they disconnect themselves.
Blind faith can be a dangerous thing...
I would have to agree that you should be pro-active in the management of your health, and that sadly there are mediocre doctors out there (well, random distribution insists that we have below average doctors). However, my post was in response to a general comment that said that with a few minutes of research you can be "smarter than your doctor" - which I take it as meaning "knowing more than your doctor". As a doctor, I was offended at making my whole education and experience summed up into "a few minutes of research".
On the other hand, when you have a rare disease, it is recommended that you research about it as much as possible, since you have a greater chance of encountering a doctor who does not know/remember that illness, and in that case you might know more than him.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
Anyone who can be irked to actually research it. These things are highly scrutinized by countless people during their development process. You might not understand it, but that doesn't mean you should try to burn it for being a witch.
The fucked-up thing is that it's even scarier when you research and do understand what actually gets puts in vaccines.
Contrary to the exaggerated claims of the pro-vaccine movement, not everyone who're against their use are uneducated, ill-informed Fundamentalists...
People don't care about relevant studies. They care about what their friend Nancy's brother's ex-wife's uncle said.
Vaccines are good, but most of the diseases they treat (especially those targetted in infant vaccines) were already in sharp decline before vaccination against them became popular.
Polio was in decline, yes, in the same way that the flu is in decline every year around spring. Polio epidemics were seasonal.
It kills in cycles. We stopped the cycle after it hit its low point.
Apparently they are. Your kid will be exposed to more crap by crawling around on the carpet than by getting injected with a vaccine.
Trusting the word of someone in a profession where he/she inarguably knows more than you is not blind faith. It's called listening to your doctor. You're far more likely to be wrong or make a mistake than he/she is.
People don't care about relevant studies. They care about what their friend Nancy's brother's ex-wife's uncle said.
In other words, we have this wonderful thing called the World Wide Web, and most people will get their relevant medical knowledge from gossip.
Well, that explains a lot.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
a little bit of knowledge can be a dangerous thing
blind faith can be a dangerous thing
So the answer lies in the middle somewhere. You can't match a physician's years of training, but you can make an effort to understand what's going on. At a minimum, that means finding out if the proposed treatment for your condition is appropriate (and there may be more than one, and your doctor may have good reasons for selecting a particular one.) Make sure that your doctor has the requisite experience to treat you properly: not all physicians are one hundred percent up-front about that. Don't be afraid to find another one, if you aren't comfortable with what you're hearing. Seek out a second opinion if necessary.
In the end though, once you've decided upon a course of action, you are largely taking matters on faith, but that's why we have experts. We take it on faith that the engineers, architects, regulators and other people who built our civilization do, by and large, know what they're doing. That applies to the medical profession as well: health is always something of a risk, but there's no question that making a decision that's as informed as you can make it is worth the effort.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
My doctor reads slashdot. Now what.
Whoa, dude. Find another doctor, fast.
The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
Apparently they are. Your kid will be exposed to more crap by crawling around on the carpet than by getting injected with a vaccine.
You have a completely convoluted 50's-era mentality of what is and isn't good for the human body that definitely does not jibe with the observations and discoveries we've made in recent decades.
It's actually extremely important that infants and toddlers be exposed to the wide variety of pathogens and microbes that are an essential part of our surroundings (your "crap on the carpet"), otherwise their immune systems fail to develop properly.
Research has clearly demonstrated that the more we sterilize our bodies and ourselves, the more it screws up our immune systems.
Settlement awards like this! You want to know why when you go to the doctor for "chest pains", and it ends up being nothing more than a bad case of heart burn, that they wanted to do MRI, Cat scans, dye marker tests, stress tests etc etc, THIS is why. Doctors are scared to death of being sued for something they might miss. Too many ambulance chasing slip & fall lawyers will sue on the drop of a hat. Drug makers have to charge a hefty fee for their drugs, because they have to have a built in profit margin, to cover themselves in the event of a lawsuit, if their drug causes a severe reaction or death. Even if it is 1 in a million, you've seen the ads on TV. "If you or a loved one took drug x, you may be "entitled" to compensation". Crap like that drives the costs of everything up. Slip & fall on a wet spot in a business, and the ambulance chasers come out of the woodwork. I think it was Shakespeare who once said "kill all the lawyers". THAT would be a good start!
(while I actually do agree with you)
perhaps SOME of it is necessary for the doctors to cover their lawsuit asses just in case it actually turns out to be a zebra
Honest self assessment, if the 'cold' turned out to be 'lung cancer' and the doctor treated a cold only.. what's your take on it then....
why didn't he run tests?
can't win with the current system.. it is what we have...
every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
An interesting blog on this topic - http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/09/cbs_news_resident_anti-vaccine_propagand.php
Of course, the corporations that sell these vaccines (and the regulatory agencies that are supposed to oversee them) have done a fairly efficient and successful job of making sure the information remains out of the mainstream. They've also made sure that you're branded a retard or lunatic if you attempt to point out the failures of the system.
There's an overwhelming amount of research showing that we have a huge problem with consistency and quality control. All kinds of bizarre, dangerous substances have been found in vaccines, including monkey and chicken DNA, viruses... nevermind the Thimerosal!
Many of the arguments against vaccinating don't necessarily have anything to do with it as a matter of principle but rather address the practical aspects of its implementation.
Unfortunately, a Slashdot reader believes that a personal attack will pass muster with this community. We are too smart for that. When doctors talk of obesity they often state, our genetics didn't change, so environmental factors must be contributing to the rise in obesity. The same must be said for Autism. Our genetics did not change, so there must be an environmental factor (or factors). The thing that bothers me is that people become polarized over the issue.
The parents of Autistic children (I am one) tend to focus too much on one environmental factor (Vaccines) when there are plenty of other factors. They also discount the benefits that vaccines have provided to our society in general. The "informed" community ignores research that does not concur with their point of view while making character attacks by associating those parents with Playboy.
Both groups have some valid points, but will never make progress while pointing the finger at each other. My hope is that a group will come together with open minds to research Autism no matter where the evidence leads them. For instance:
The industry that I work in (computers & electronics) seems to be the worst at contaminating the environment. According to National Geographic, electronics account for less than 2% of landfill waste while contributing 70% of landfill toxicity.
http://s.ngm.com/2008/01/high-tech-trash/computer-interactive
Funny how the rise in Autism closely matches the rise of this industry. Are there any statisticians interested in looking into this?
There is also a factor of chemical contamination, which is largely undocumented in public records. Companies can register various chemicals as perfumes, apply for trademark protection, and withhold the chemical composition based on trade secrets.
http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2010/01/by_scott_hensley_debates_rage.html
When it comes to vaccines, however, I am still wary of the methods of sterilization, including the addition of Formaldehyde, Aluminum, and Mercury (still in the multi-dose flu shot). Although I am not a health professional, I understand that many diseases have been mitigated through vaccination, and that vaccines have been very effective. Personally, I would hope that vaccine sterilization is best achieved through gamma radiation of single dose vials. Then again, some people go crazy with the word "radiation".
I have followed Dr. Wakefield's ethical case, and understand that his methods were at question, and his results have not been duplicated in humans. Although there is a new study which calls the vaccine regimen of the 1990s into question.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20628439
I also understand that it is not in the interest of vaccine manufacturers to find a link with Autism.
http://www.askdrsears.com/thevaccinebook/labels/Vaccines%20and%20Autism.asp
I also suspect that there is a link to the bowel. I don't know an Autistic kid who doesn't have bowel problems, but that is a limited view. For my son, treatment for Candida and the use of probiotics has helped enormously.
http://www.pnas.org/content/107/33/14691
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/content/abstract/peds.2009-1862v1
When he stops taking probiotics, however, his symptoms reappear. Stool samples have been used to verify the issues. A gluten free / casein free diet helps both Stephen, and the family member with MS.
http://esciencenews.com/articles/2010/07/21/toxic.trio.identified.basis.celiac.disease
http://www.jimmunol.org/cgi/content/full/182/7/4158#TI
I seem to recall a recent Slashdot article about Gluten, but cant find it anymore.
So what this really comes down to for me is, "You are what you eat, drink, breathe, etc." Autism appears to have both a genetic and environmental component. We have to stop bickering over this crap and start working to resolve the issue. Anybody interested?
Furthermore, vaccines are known to introduce a wide...
That should have read "...a wide variety." Sorry for the sloppy typo.
I beg to differ. Q was definitely a psychopath if I ever saw one
Q's was the, "Other". And would you let Q inject you with anything?
-FL
I am NOT one of the anti vaccine people. I think all kids need to be vaccinated. Those that trust to herd immunity are leaches, and taking a great risk.
I also think it is pure cold blooded greed to use the preservatives could very well cause this because the safer ones are more expensive.
So there!
* Carthago Delenda Est *
Our society is so litigious that we can't get a vaccine for one set the VERY common MMR because there is might be a link to an unknown mitochondrial disorder?
6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
No. The history and empirical evidence is that vaccines work very well, with very few side effects.
As I said, vaccines are a great idea. But did you not pay attention during the debacle of the last flu season? Billions of dollars changed hands and the vaccine caused much of the reported damage.
Sure, Polio is a great thing to wave goodbye to. But many decades have passed, the people have changed and the product and the marketing and the intentions behind them are no longer singular.
History and empirical evidence doesn't just point to the things you want them to point to. That's a variation of confirmation bias. You have to observe the big picture, because like it or not, greed is in effect and population-wide jabs, which so many people literally become enraged at the slightest suggestion that they should be re-considered, are an excellent way to subdue and control a population.
-FL
20 million dollars divided by 310 million people equals 6 cents. You'd kill a child to save yourself 6 cents? Here you can have all the change in my wallet, you promise not to kill any kids now okay?
If you want to be a libertarian outlaw vigilante, destroy F35 (or ideally, B2 Spirit, if they're still in production) production lines. Those will save you 32c and $6.45 for unit not produced respectively.
(All figures calculated with rough estimates and assuming a flat tax)
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
Approximately 4,800 are awaiting disposition in federal vaccine court.
What is "federal vaccine court"?
Advice: on VPS providers
All kinds of bizarre, dangerous substances have been found in vaccines, including monkey and chicken DNA, viruses... nevermind the Thimerosal!
You had me until 'Thimerosal'. I thought we'd had enough studies that demonstrate Thimerosal isn't the problem. Now you just sound like another anti-vaxxer and I'll need to ask to see citations for the rest of your assertions. :/
http://scienceblogs.com/insolence/2010/09/cbs_news_resident_anti-vaccine_propagand.php#comments
This sums it up
Slashdot - The great and glorious cluster fuck of Internet wisdom.
Don't worry, I suspect he'll also say this:
chances are with a few minutes of research you are smarter than the guy who wrote the piece of software you're using...
In acknowledging Hannah's injuries, the government said vaccines aggravated an unknown mitochondrial disorder Hannah had which didn't 'cause' her autism, but 'resulted' in it
I read the actual decision and I think the "resulting" part is a misinterpretation . What the decision said was:
"Respondent has conceded that petitioners are entitled to compensation due to significant aggravation of Child Doe/77's pre-existing mitochondrial disorder based on MMR vaccine Table presumptive injury of encephalopathy which eventually manifested as a chronic encephalopathy with features of autism spectrum disorder and a complex partial seizure disorder as a sequela
My reading of that is the vaccine aggravated a mithochondrial disorder that the child had and that the child now has chronic encephalopathy with symptoms like autism. The keyword is "like". It is similar to someone I know who was in a motorcycle accident. If a doctor were describe his injuries it would be something along the lines of "brain injury with loss of some motor and speech functions with features of a stroke." He didn't have a stroke but that's the best way to describe it.
Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
Ha ha!
Oh dear. Life IS confusing, isn't it?
Let me try to break it down for anybody confused by that video. . .
Yes, on the most fundamental level, we live in self-service society. Every time we feed ourselves, we must take life, be it plant or animal. There is simply no getting around the nature of our reality in this regard.
Greed, however, as I define the term, is not the same as what one might call, functional self-interest. Those afflicted with Greed like to rationalize their disease by claiming it is natural and good. But it is not. It's like saying eating all the food at the table and leaving none for the rest of your family is good because we need to eat to survive. Greed destroys communities, whole societies. Witness the economic melt-down of our current society. Self-interest allowed to go cancerous without any of the rational self-limiting behavior a responsible adult ought to show has resulted in wars, catastrophic oil spills, economic collapse. -And, I would point out, an un-trustworthy medical establishment.
The problem is that psychopaths are basically humans which never grew emotional capacities beyond those of a toddler. They cannot differentiate between themselves and the rest of the world. They WANT and they NEED, self-interest on over-drive, and all they did upon maturing is learn how to manipulate the world into delivering a constant, endless and beyond-reason stream of resources down their gullet.
In that way, Greed destroys and is, in fact, a disease, not to be mistaken for common self-interest.
And finally. . , the comparative comments made by that Friedman guy regarding Soviet Russia must be recognized as irrelevant. There's a big difference between mandating control measures to weed out psychopaths and corrupt behavior known to cause systematic failure (like the housing market melt-down), and a social experiment which tried to control all aspects of a population's self expression via centralized government. Those two animals are not the same, but it's easy to fool people with the comparison.
Friedman asks, "Where are you going to find the angels?"
Those ascending to positions of power need to be tested for sociopathy. That would be a BIG step.
-FL
"don't blindly follow the doctors orders, chances are with a few minutes of research you are smarter than your doctor."
Absolutely. You should definitely do a few minutes of research and then treat yourself. Repeatedly. Keep doing it until, well, you'll see. The world will be a better place.
How is that? We still use vaccines against pertussis, polio and a whole bunch of other diseases. Except for polio these aren't usually brought out as the poster children of vaccination success stories but they're still there, still preventing diseases most of us probably have barely heard of that previously killed or crippled a large percentage of children.
Sure, the actual formulations have been changed a bit. And those changes have been very carefully validated and found to make the vaccines even safer and more effective.
The only really different one is the flu vaccine, and again, flu vaccines are very carefully monitored and validated.
Uh, right. Here are the numbers for Polio. It went into sharp decline all right. Twice in fact. Once after the first vaccine was introduced, and again after it was refined.
http://www.post-polio.org/ir-usa.html
When posting, there's a popup at the bottom next to submit. Set it to "plain old text" so that your carriage returns aren't stripped out.
I'm unclear why "plain old text" isn't the default because it's how most people expect it to work.
http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
Aaaand nothing you've said in that post has anything to do with vaccines, which are for diseases that can be fatal. Sure, crawling around is necessary. I'm not a big fan of clean freaks who sterilize the hell out of everything. We can agree on that. But I fail to see how vaccines fit into that. Not slathering Purell on your hands every time you touch something isn't going to kill you. Pertussis could.
I fail to see what you're trying to say here.
Many parents who believe there is a connection between the Vaccines and Autism claim there is way far less autism in children that don't get all of these shots at one time. My daughters pediatrician will not give them to his patient's all at once. They are given one at a time. Yes this means more trips to the doctors office. It would be interesting to note how many here on /. have a family member that is autistic? In my family we have one. This disease is everywhere and has affected many family's. I had visited a few years back many forums on this subject. I could not find any families at the time, that their child did not get the vaccine cocktail.
I also think it is pure cold blooded greed to use the preservatives could very well cause this because the safer ones are more expensive.
I don't. It's part of the reason why we were able to eradicate smallpox(except outside of the lab). It became cheap enough to give it to everyone, the same has more or less been happening with polio. Except where large numbers of religious nutjobs in the middle east think it's a jewish plot to kill them, or make them infertile.
Om, nomnomnom...
Read the second link in TFA (or here).
This case is about a direct causal relationship. Child gets immunization, child develops high fever, child shows signs of brain injury. It just happens to have an autism-LIKE appearance but is not believed to actually be autism. Unlike autism, this is a recognized (but certainly not publicized) rare adverse reaction.
This is in sharp contrast to the typical autism claim of child gets immunized, child cries (as young children do for any shot), child seems fine, months later child shows signs of autism.
.
[FUCK BETA]
I don't have to think critically. I just have to refer to the courts who have repeatedly ruled that vaccines did indeed cause autism and the other defects they are claimed to. Oh, wait. None of them have. This girl's case is tragic, but it has nothing to do with vaccine-induced autism. If your claims were correct - and I accept that you have a personal interest in them being correct - the courts would be overflowing with such cases. There are plenty lawyers that would take on such a fight pro bono if they thought they could win it. Where are they?
[FUCK BETA]
Indeed, the Vaccine Court tilts toward the plaintiff in multiple ways. The government pays the plaintiff's lawyers, win or lose, so there is a big incentive for lawyers to take such cases, even if the chance of winning is slim. And the standard of evidence is lower in the Vaccine Court--basically, compensation is awarded if it is at all plausible that a person's injury could have been caused by the vaccination. And if the plaintiff loses, they still have the option of suing in regular court.
However, I think that this is reasonable. Vaccination does not just benefit the person being vaccinated, it benefits society, because the main way in which vaccination prevents disease is not by protecting the individual from infection, but rather by making it impossible for an epidemic to get started in the first place. Immunity to disease (whether from vaccination or previous exposure to the disease) is not absolute--the risk of contracting the disease is reduced, but not to zero. The reason most people do not contract diseases like measles, whooping cough, or polio is that an infection is unable to spread through the population, because on the average an infected person ends up infecting less than one other person. When that is the case, the disease cannot spread, and simply peters out.
But when immunization is successful, the disease is virtually eradicated from the entire population. Vaccines are some of the safest effective medical treatments known to man, but they do have risks, albeit very small. But when a disease is nearly eradicated, the risk of the disease to each individual is less than the risk of the vaccine--so long as all of his neighbors are properly vaccinated. So the situation is tailor-made for a "tragedy of the commons," in which each individual pursues his own selfish self interest, and as a result, everybody suffers far more than would have been the case if everybody had cooperated to share a small risk in order to avert a much greater one.
So it makes sense to provide a public safety net to compensate everybody who suffers a genuine vaccine injury--because people who get vaccinated are performing a public service. Yes, this will means some people will be compensated who would have gotten sick anyway, and Hannah Poling is very likely one of these. Mitochondrial diseases can be triggered by many stressors, including very minor illnesses, so there is a good chance that something or other would have triggered Hannah's illness even if she hadn't been vaccinated. Indeed, children like Hannah may well be at greater risk if they are not vaccinated, but that is obviously of little comfort to anybody after the fact.
So just as our criminal justice system occasionally lets real criminals go free to protect the innocent, the Vaccine Court sometimes rewards unscrupulous lawyers who exploit parents of autistic children, and sometimes provides compensation to people who probably aren't really entitled to it. But that is a small price to pay for providing just compensation for those who actually do suffer genuine harm from vaccination
What can I say? Al's a funny-looking guy.
False in two respects. First, it is not true that the pertussis (whooping cough) vaccine only immunizes against the toxin. Second it is not true that immunizing only against the toxin does not reduce the spread of the disease. (hardly surprising that preventing a symptom--coughing--that spreads disease would reduce the spread of that disease)
That also holds your prescriptions etc.
It is very easy for the computer to check all the interaction possibilities. Not so much for a human, no matter how well trained.
That one case, sure. But what if all the other pending trials used that one case as their anchor and weathered the full storm in court? At $10k per case that could easily rise above $20m.
-1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
I also suspect that there is a link to the bowel. I don't know an Autistic kid who doesn't have bowel problems, but that is a limited view. For my son, treatment for Candida and the use of probiotics has helped enormously.
I have a friend from high school whose kid has seizures/autism/etc. They've found that a low-carb ("ketogenic") diet helps significantly.
Cayce gave a few readings about people with autism-like symptoms... One factor in the case were "adhesions" and scar tissue in the lacteals, the lymphatic channels which are attached to the small intestines. The scar tissue serves to short-circuit parts of the abdominal nervous system.
The treatment advised included castor oil packs and other therapies, which slowly dissolve the scar tissue and help stimulate normal lymph flow.
See my website, or send me an email for more information (james @ teslabox.com - I don't check ye olde yahoo acct too frequently).
Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
www.teslabox.com
I'm a medical student and spend a good part of my day referencing textbooks and Google on random diseases that come up while I'm rotating through the hospital. I can assure you that, unless it's something very rare or clinically trivial, a few minutes with Google will not teach you more than what an experienced doctor knows unless it's outside of their specialty. It'd be nice if it were that easy, but sadly it isn't.
OTOH, do research first so you don't have to blindly follow doctor's orders. That way you have the background knowledge to facilitate a more meaningful discussion.
From the link you provided: "Since 1988, the program has been funded by an excise tax of 75 cents on every purchased dose of covered vaccine."
This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
Correct, Thanks. And I thought I got the handle on all the "than vs. then" issue.
Blame it on my programmer's eyes. When I see a 'then', I have a hunt around for an 'if' (or at least a preceding event), and get confused when one does not exist.
Ask me about repetitive DNA
False. Vaccine manufacturers may be sued directly if a plaintiff does not prevail in the vaccine court.
However, there is not much incentive for plaintiffs to do so, as the rules of evidence are more favorable to the plaintiff in vaccine court, and the plaintiff's legal costs are covered, win or lose. So if somebody can't win in the vaccine court, the chances that they will prevail in the civil courts are pretty dismal.
Of course, the costs would come out of the public's pockets even if the Vaccine Court did not exist, because vaccine manufacturers must charge enough to cover their costs, including the costs of litigation and potential awards. In the worst case, fear of liability might become so great that no commercial firm is willing to manufacture the vaccine, in which case the public would also be saddled with the costs of the inevitable disease outbreaks, and probably eventually with the cost of the federal government itself producing the vaccine.
Antivaxxers believe that all of these serious disease--smallpox, polio, measles, pertussis, rubella--just by coincidence, decided on their own to go away just about the time the vaccine became available. Of course, most of these infectious diseases exhibit a "boom and bust" pattern, because after an epidemic, the must susceptible individuals are dead or immune, so the incidence declines until immunity wanes. So the disease rates rise and fall. But virtual elimination of an infectious disease of this nature requires a vaccine.
You don't have to be all that smart to look up the symptoms of autism and encephalopathy and discover that while encephalopathy may occasionally have symptoms that resemble autism, encephalopathy typically includes a whole bunch of other symptoms that are rarely seen in autism. Indeed, most forms of encephalopathy are associated with evidence of gross brain damage, whereas typical autistic brain differs from normal brain only in very subtle ways, in the levels of certain neurotransmitter receptors and slight changes in cell distribution--all of which fit with a host of other evidence that indicates that autism is a developmental disorder, almost certainly of genetic origin, that begins well before symptoms become obvious, rather than a form of acute brain damage such as encephalopathy.
our cigarettes didn't 'cause' your cancer, the smoking of them just 'resulted' in it.
...
My heart goes out to all of the families with children with Autism or Aspergers. I cannot imagine how difficult it must be to come to terms with the fact that your child has one of these conditions, and then to fight to ensure that your child gets the education and care needed for them to live a rich, fulfilling life.
Blaming vaccinations is not the answer, however. There have been a wealth of impartial studies performed, and the results overwhelmingly show that autism is NOT caused by vaccinations. For example, there was an extensive review performed in 2004 by the Institute of Medicine, an organization chartered by the National Academy of Sciences in 1970 to serve as an adviser to the federal government on issues affecting the public's health, as well as to act *independently* in identifying important issues of medical care, research, and education. (see http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20669467)
By falsely linking autism and vaccines, parents have been hesitant to vaccinate their children. The lack of vaccinations has resulted in unnecessary illnesses, complications, and deaths due to diseases that are 100% avoidable. (For over a hundred real-life accounts of people who have suffered or died from vaccine-preventable diseases, you can visit http://www.immunize.org/reports/. The main body of the site is pretty interesting, too.) I cannot imagine how a parent must feel, knowing that their child is disabled or dead because they weren't immunized. I'm betting it's 1,000x worse than the parent of an autistic child who was immunized, since there is absolutely no question that the (in)action of the parent is to blame.
Calling for more studies to prove what has already been established - that vaccines do not cause autism - diverts funds away from research that can try to establish what *does* cause the disease and develop more effective treatment methods. I think that we all would be better served by putting funds towards this kind of research.
Well, if that is the case then I am relieved.
Whenever in an argument, remember this.
At such a high risk, wouldn't it be better not to vaccinate childern? After all, what bit of risk is paralyzation, small pocks, and all the bunch of other sicknesses compared to this?
US courts suck. Big time. At least more often than not ...
Well you'll have to debunk stuff like this then.
http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=49094
Also, trying to reply to all the followups, which contradict one another:
- does the fact that they are suppressed and not gone change one bit of what I said? the point is not being effective on the disease BUT being effective and not cause bad collateral effects.
Else, a lethal dose of poison cures diseases too, more effectively than anything else. The focus must be on the well being of people, not anything else.
Since 0% collateral effects is impossible in practice, those who get vaccination should have a honest estimate of their chances to get the disease vs their chances to get collateral effects. Could be that a polio vaccination is a good idea while a flu one isn't.
Could be that blanket vaccination campaigns might be statistically more harmful than focused ones following outbursts of disease.
Could be that nobody has the incentive to cure a disease if vaccinations as they are performed now yield more profit, so there ought to be a way to put research for cures above the one for treatments and vaccinations.
---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
autism is defined only by symptoms, so there could always be another way to reach those symptoms... thus "THE cause" of autism CAN NEVER EXIST.
it's basically the same as looking for "the cause" of the sniffles... it's ignorant.
I know a pediatrician who had an autistic child. Unfortunately the trauma of the event and the internet conspiracy theorists convinced her to withold that vaccine for her next child. Unfortunately, the next child also became autistic. So now she firmly does not believe in the conspiracy theory. Of course this is merely anecdotal evidence with a very small sample size and many other statistical no-no's.
you're an idiot.