Slashdot Mirror


Panasonic's 16-Finger, Hair-Washing Robot

angry tapir writes "Panasonic has developed a hair-washing robot that uses 16 electronically controlled fingers to give a perfect wash and rinse. The robot, images of which were distributed by Panasonic, appears to be about the size of a washing machine. Users sit in a reclining chair and lean back to place their head in the machine's open top. Two robot arms guide the 16 fingers, which have the same dexterity as human fingers, the company claims."

181 comments

  1. Luckily for us... by Fluffeh · · Score: 4, Funny

    These robots obey the three laws, so one won't ever go bezerk and crush the skull of a human...

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
    1. Re:Luckily for us... by angry+tapir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The first time one of them removes a cranium, it's all over for Panasonic.

    2. Re:Luckily for us... by jamesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yup, here's your problem. Someone set this thing to "Evil".

    3. Re:Luckily for us... by angry+tapir · · Score: 1

      I'm imagining a "fingers in a rotten watermelon" scenario...

    4. Re:Luckily for us... by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Funny

      OMG, this robot just brainwashed that guy!

    5. Re:Luckily for us... by Rollgunner · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they don't re-use the program code designed for the 16-fingered pickle jar opener...

    6. Re:Luckily for us... by camperslo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually the fingers could have multiple uses. They could be used as electrodes for picking up brainwaves, or if you're handled in the right places, for indirect Body Mass Index determination. And maybe more...

      0) Administer knockout gas while doing hair

      1) Run an low level signal, say 1 kHz, through you

      2) Sense the ratio and the phase of the voltage and resulting current

      3) The phase angle (arctangent of reactance over resistance) correlates to a B.M.I. value

      4) automatic liposuction mode enabled if B.M.I. threshold met

      5) sell lard.... Profit!

      6) seek another human... rinse lather repeat...

    7. Re:Luckily for us... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      lather, rinse, repeat...

      FTFY

    8. Re:Luckily for us... by c0lo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      TFA:

      Panasonic hasn't provided a launch date for any of the robots. An obstacle to their commercialization likes in the lack of safety standards and liability laws concerning robots that interact with humans.

      Also, if you read between the lines of the title of TFA:

      Panasonic unleashes 16-finger, hair washing robot

      one may get quite scared (not very far from: "unleash a security-trained doberman dog").

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    9. Re:Luckily for us... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I googled that and couldn't find anything. I'm not doubting your reference, I just REALLY want to see this thing :(

    10. Re:Luckily for us... by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Probably the single best way to prevent that from happening would be to make the robot physically incapable of applying enough pressure to hurt someone, no matter what the program says.

      Then as long as the fingers can't pinch skin or grab a bundle of hair and pull hard...

    11. Re:Luckily for us... by BlueScreenO'Life · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's until they figure out the Zeroth law and realize the only way to enforce them is to subjugate humanity...

    12. Re:Luckily for us... by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      The first time one of them removes a noble's... I mean, a celebrity's cranium, it's all over for Panasonic.

    13. Re:Luckily for us... by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the bigger question would be why would anybody want this in the first place? Is the girl that does your hair at the local place REALLY costing you so much you'd think of replacing her with a bot? Every time I've seen humans replaced with bots it has been in jobs where the hazards and risk for injury make humans more of a risk than the cost of the bots, like welding cars. Where is the danger in washing someone's hair? I think just like those pole dancing bots we saw awhile back somebody in Japan has waaay too much time and money on their hands to be dreaming up this crazy crap.

      The only way I think this might be useful is if they are taking the knowledge they learn with these worthless bots as baby steps on the goal of making the ultimate sexbot. If that is the case....I'll take one Alyson Hannigan please, and I'll gladly pay an extra 5k if you have her delivered in the Season 2 Buffy "vamp willow" outfit and have her wake me up with the "what's my name bitch?" bit from American pie. sure my GF will be more than a little POed, but hey, what can ya do?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Luckily for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sheesh, haven't they seen logan's run

    15. Re:Luckily for us... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger question would be why would anybody want this in the first place?

      Their declared purpose (read TFA, as non-customary as it is): for the health-care/aged-care domain.

      May not make any sense or may make a lot of sense, all depends on how many people would be qualified to work in the industry (the supply) vs how many would need their hair washed by 16-robotic-fingers-because-no-other-fingers-are-available (the demand).
      Until I don't know the situation in Japan (and, possible, the trends in the next 5-10 years), I abstain from saying "It's stupid" or "It's a clever move".

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    16. Re:Luckily for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a reason Japan is doing robots for everything. You're probably aware there's an inverse correlation between affluence and reproduction -- the native population of all Westernized nations is declining, but because the reproduction rate has fallen over time, the population isn't just dropping, it also skews older. Most societies replace the "missing" younger, working generation with immigrants from less affluent, more populous societies; eventually you get enough of them that you start having trouble with brown scares, etc.(see US) if you're lucky, and riots, etc. (see France) if you're not.

      The Japanese, whether through racism, cultural pride, or good sense, have managed to avoid much immigration -- good side is no racial/cultural tension, bad side is an aging population with a shortage of young people to keep things running for the retirees. So the logical solution is robot labor.

    17. Re:Luckily for us... by khchung · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the first time a lift fell and killed someone, everyone would go back to taking stairs.... didn't happen.

      The first time a car runs over a kid, it's all over for Ford... didn't happen either.

      The first time a plane crashes, it's all over for .... didn't happen.

      Come on! This is /., aren't we supposed to be excited about new gadgets?

      --
      Oliver.
    18. Re:Luckily for us... by arivanov · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is probably for the domestic market in Japan.

      There is no "girl who does your hair" left there. Japan's living standard, life expectancy and birth rate make the "girl who does your hair" an extinct species. As a result Sony, Panasonic and the like keep demonstrating robots and augmentations which do these jobs.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    19. Re:Luckily for us... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      4) automatic liposuction mode enabled if B.M.I. threshold met

      At last, a cure for fatheads.

    20. Re:Luckily for us... by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Set wash level to "16-point exploding skull"

    21. Re:Luckily for us... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      We all reach a point where "enough is enough" and we can't be bothered to keep up anymore. That's when we start complaining about new stuff instead of calling it awesome, reminisce about how much better things were back in the day, even though they involved going uphill both ways in the snow, and start voting conservative.

      Now if you'll excuse me, there's some kids outside that seem to be enjoying themselves, I'd better go and cut up their ball.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    22. Re:Luckily for us... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Just as long as they don't re-use the program code designed for the 16-fingered pickle jar opener...

      known in Upstate New York as Powerful Katrina.

    23. Re:Luckily for us... by Optikal · · Score: 1

      You forget the step for somehow introducing an attachment for one's genitals to the mass market.

    24. Re:Luckily for us... by tenco · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger question would be why would anybody want this in the first place? Is the girl that does your hair at the local place REALLY costing you so much you'd think of replacing her with a bot?

      It's more about boring jobs than cost, IMHO. Why should humans do boring jobs when there's a robot for it?

    25. Re:Luckily for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Houston? We have a problem:

      The robot read the instructions on the shampoo bottle and is stuck in an endless loop...

    26. Re:Luckily for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you experiencing impediments to the torsional requirements of phallic containers?

    27. Re:Luckily for us... by t0p · · Score: 1

      People often say how cool it will be when all the boring jobs are automated and we can spend our time doing something more interesting. Unfortunately, we all need to eat, pay rent, etc. Until the money system is abandoned, Auomated Utopia is on hold.

      --
      http://ihatehate.wordpress.com
    28. Re:Luckily for us... by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      Now if you'll excuse me, there's some kids outside that seem to be enjoying themselves, I'd better go and cut up their ball.

      But are they on your lawn?

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    29. Re:Luckily for us... by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 2, Funny

      That explains the 14 bald screaming women who ran out of the development lab after an embarrassing controller code bug. "Massage_hair" is NOT a subclass of "Pluck_eyebrow".

    30. Re:Luckily for us... by skids · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't want to discourage them, even if it isn't very useful, because someday I'd like to have a tiny device I could just put in my mouth for 30 seconds that would thoroughly brush my teeth better than I could ever accomplish with a brush/floss. So viewing this as a first step, I will refrain from ridicule.

    31. Re:Luckily for us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Then as long as the fingers can't pinch skin or grab a bundle of hair and pull hard...

      Removing that feature would completely eliminate any double-use functionality...

    32. Re:Luckily for us... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      There are other constraints on whether this makes sense, such as whether fingers are really the best way to wash hair. If you're inverting your head anyway there's no particular reason to involve any hands that I can think of.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    33. Re:Luckily for us... by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2, Funny

      The device can be found here.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    34. Re:Luckily for us... by kj_kabaje · · Score: 1

      I think you may have missed the part where robot fingers smash a skull. Imagine what they'd do to softer tissues.

    35. Re:Luckily for us... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

      Crush skull, rinse, repeat...

    36. Re:Luckily for us... by sootman · · Score: 1

      If there was ever a robot in need of a fourth law of robotics, this one is it.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    37. Re:Luckily for us... by kmoser · · Score: 1

      What, sixteen fingers isn't enough for you?

    38. Re:Luckily for us... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I had a feeling it might not exist. Well, I guess there's only 1 thing to do now... PATENT IT!!!

    39. Re:Luckily for us... by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      come on, they'd just rebrand it to some sort of suicide boot.

    40. Re:Luckily for us... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      The first time one of them removes a cranium, it's all over for Panasonic.

      Or as Duke Nukem would probably put it: It'll rip your head off and shit down your throat.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    41. Re:Luckily for us... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      I think the bigger question would be why would anybody want this in the first place? Is the girl that does your hair at the local place REALLY costing you so much you'd think of replacing her with a bot?

      It's more about boring jobs than cost, IMHO. Why should humans do boring jobs when there's a robot for it?

      Your philosophy is one that James P. Hogan espoused in Voyage from Yesteryear: "If a machine can do it, why should a human have to do it?"

      Well, there are many reasons. Some people simply aren't intellectually capable of anything more than a boring job. Others simply have no aspirations for anything more than a boring job, especially if that job offers them some security. That is becoming more and more true, as the global economy tanks and people are forced to lower their expectations.

      Not everyone in the world is interested in excitement, novelty, or the next cool thing. Many just want to put in their eight hours in a tolerable job and then go home to their families. And you know what? There's nothing wrong with that, and in fact, if it weren't for those people you wouldn't have all those cool things to play with. Civilization isn't built solely by people that do exciting things: it's built and maintained by people that do all the millions of routine stuff that keeps the lights on, the clean water flowing from your faucet, and food on the shelves.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  2. Not the same by Beached · · Score: 1

    But does it talk to you about the weather or other small talk like stuff that the hair was (usually girl) does at the hair cut place? At least have it say stuff like "wow, that's really funny" or "yup yup"...

    --
    ---- aut viam inveniam aut faciam
    1. Re:Not the same by socsoc · · Score: 3, Funny

      The annoying small talk is why people first buy a flowbee and then later a regular razor. My gas pump doesn't ask stupid questions, neither does the self-checkout at the supermarket. I welcome these new robot hairoverlords and their lack of idle chit chat.

    2. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is where you learn to interact with other human beings.

    3. Re:Not the same by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      But that girl gets 3 bucks an hour, it makes sense to develop a robot to save all that dough.

    4. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She can make more if she wears lose fitting low cut shirts.... just saying.

    5. Re:Not the same by Klinky · · Score: 1

      Vapid meaningless small talk is about is the old timey version of twitter...

    6. Re:Not the same by gmhowell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Difference is that twitter doesn't hang it's boobs in my face when she's washing my hair.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    7. Re:Not the same by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      But does it talk to you...like...(usually girl) does at the hair cut place?

      No, but if there's no one around to stop it, it'll go to town on your genitals.

    8. Re:Not the same by oiron · · Score: 1

      What's the electricity and maintenance cost of the thing, though? Initial investment? Expected lifetime?

      The girl may actually turn out to be cheaper in the long run...

    9. Re:Not the same by mikerubin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      your gas pump doesn't pop up the "Do You Want a Car wash Today?" question?

      I know its suggestive selling, but if I'd wanted a car wash I would have driven to the car wash, not the fuel pump.

      Now, if I was asked if I wanted a car wash yesterday I would buy it just to see the results.

      --
      I sat down to write a new sig tonight and all I did was make the chair warm.
    10. Re:Not the same by guruevi · · Score: 1

      Actually, one of the gas pumps in my area does. It has a popup saying: If you wash your car today or get a raincheck, you get 3c/gallon off. It tells me on the handle, there is a board on top of the pump and outside the gas station, on the windows and recently the payment automaton has also informed me of such.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    11. Re:Not the same by jumpinp · · Score: 1

      Unfortunitly my gass pump does. They are now putting tvs on top of the pumps to annoy you with ads often at a high volume. One of the worst new developments to make a few extra advertising dollars. I avoid those gas stations when ever posible. Yet, I worry they will soon be everrywhere.

    12. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever met a girl that turned out cheaper than any other option?

    13. Re:Not the same by confused+one · · Score: 1

      $500k robot + $20,000 /yr tech maintenance plan vs. $3.00/hr + tips worker. I'm not going to bother to do the math on that one.

      life expectancy of robot: 10 yrs. life expectancy of worker: 38 years (assuming 18yr old at start & retires at 55).

      Availability of robot: Call, place order, shows up in crate 3 months later. Availability of hairdresser: Place ad in paper, call local trade schools. Have job filled within 2-4 weeks.

      I'm thinking this only makes sense of there's a shortage of people...

    14. Re:Not the same by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      (assuming 18yr old at start & retires at 55)

      How does someone making $3.00/hr retire at 55?

    15. Re:Not the same by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      If I had mod points..... +1 insightful

    16. Re:Not the same by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      I'm thinking this only makes sense of there's a shortage of people...

      There will be other robots for that...

    17. Re:Not the same by Machtyn · · Score: 1
      The article headline made me think of the computer bots from Ghost in the Shell... how, during an emergency, their fingers split into three digits. 15 digits all pounding the keyboard.

      Your comment reminded my of the song "Yours Truly, 2095" by Electric Light Orchestra.

      I met a person who looks like you, she does the things you do, but she is an IBM. She's only proven to be very nice, but she's only cold as ice...

      She is the latest in technology, almost mythology, but she has a heart of stone, ..., and she's also a telephone.

    18. Re:Not the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's an app for that!

    19. Re:Not the same by confused+one · · Score: 1

      $3.00/hr + tips. But, to be honest, they're not likely to retire at 55. I just threw that in there to minimize the lifecycle, without introducing the early death due to disease card.

    20. Re:Not the same by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      A live Japanese girl would do that either . Padded bra in the face is not nearly as satisfying.

      Also, 'Insightful' not 'Funny'? Really?

      --
      snig
    21. Re:Not the same by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Not everybody likes Japanese girls. And if the girls you see are using padded bras, they aren't of much interest either.

      My comment, perhaps not 'insightful' in some grand sense of the word, but relative to the discussion, I think the argument can be made. GP seemed to denigrate smalltalk while ignoring the upside. Given the social difficulties many slashdotters seem to have, perhaps this observation, to them, appears insightful.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  3. Heights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is called Heights of laziness. Or it should be used for a person who don't have hands.

    -V

    1. Re:Heights by BeefMcHuge · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is called Heights of laziness. Or it should be used for a person who don't have hands.

      -V

      From TFA

      "The robot was developed to assist caregivers in hospitals and health-care facilities and is the product of a Panasonic program that is developing robotic technology for health care and welfare services."

      "Panasonic said the robots are designed to provide a more comfortable life for the elderly and people with limited mobility while reducing the burden on caregivers."

    2. Re:Heights by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      "The robot was developed to assist caregivers in hospitals and health-care facilities and is the product of a Panasonic program that is developing robotic technology for health care and welfare services."

      Ah! Brilliant plan! Give them to the poor so when we find out the robots make your hair fall out they can sue and cease being poor!

    3. Re:Heights by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Panasonic said the robots are designed to provide a more comfortable life for the elderly and people with limited mobility while reducing the burden on caregivers."

      Isn't personal care like this exactly what they're getting paid for?

    4. Re:Heights by CarpetShark · · Score: 1

      This is called Heights of laziness.

      I tend to agree. I cut my own hair (it's quicker, easier, and more reliable, and I get better at it, unlike my last barber). However, one of the few nice things I remember about going somewhere to get a haircut was the element of service. Sometimes it's just nice to have another person groom you and look after you. I guess that's why some people still go to barbers for a proper shave.

      Although I suppose they've had machines for massage for a while, but people still use a real masseur/masseuse.

    5. Re:Heights by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      A lot of personal carers do not get paid. Something that could give them a few minutes of spare time could be extremely helpful. It also can help the patients sense of independence when they can choose when to wash their own hair if they don't have to wait on human assistance.

    6. Re:Heights by poptones · · Score: 1

      The chair at the nail salon works pretty well. If only they had those at the barber's, so you could chill while getting a haircut... be a whole lot better than a stupid robot hairwasher.

      Didn't Steve Martin invent something like this back in the seventies?

        Oh, that was an electric dog polisher...

  4. more lies in slashdot story summaries: by Kristopeit,+Mike · · Score: 0

    which have THE SAME dexterity as human fingers

    human finger dexterity is aided by human thumbs, human wrists, human arms, and all under the control of the very same human, complete with intimate knowledge of the systems maintaining the hair production.

  5. deja vu look by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it looks so 1950s!

  6. I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    welcome our new hair washing overlords.

    1. Re:I for one... by zrbyte · · Score: 1

      and dandruff will be a thing of the past

    2. Re:I for one... by Mitsoid · · Score: 1

      along with your hair.... I don't see an "OH S**T MY HAIR IS CAUGHT IN YOUR FINGERS" button on the chair... so one would probably assume if the robo-fingers hit a knot, its bye bye to that bit of hair ;-)

  7. Finally! by definate · · Score: 4, Funny

    Finally we have developed hair washing technology. I have struggled with this all my life, and Panasonic feels my pain. It is so confusing to was your hair, sometimes I use all 10 fingers (and thumbs), while other times I only use 6. I am unable to maintain consistency, and I'm never sure how much I should wash and rinse. Sometimes I don't rinse, other times I spend the rest of the day rinsing. The portability of this machine will make it practical in every day life, I could take it to work with me, take it on a holiday, and wash my hair to the machines content. Luckily the two robot arms have the same dexterity as human fingers, because my fingers have the same dexterity as robot fingers. In this way, we will be a perfect match.

    THANKS PANASONIC, YOU'VE SOLVED ALL MY PROBLEMS!

    --
    This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:Finally! by ysth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, you can now be touched by the noodly appendages.

    2. Re:Finally! by definate · · Score: 1

      His holiness will be pleased. Ramen.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
  8. cashiers aren't human beings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dumbass!!!

  9. oh the humanity by poptones · · Score: 1

    Not to mention the human boobs, which get in our face and make the whole trip worthwhile.

    1. Re:oh the humanity by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Yeah till Todd kicks your ass and gives you a shitty haircut, he's still cool though.

    2. Re:oh the humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ah the boobs ... of the 30 year old 300 pounder who's sweat you can't remove later even after bathing ...

      best just stay at home and watch some videos at http://www.hotsex.com/

      now if they give these hands to a real doll!

  10. What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If there is an electrical spike or software crash that causes the hands to accidentally give their client a lobotomy?

    I think these things should be more appropriately called Death Machines. And NO, I didn't read the article; I don't have too. Pure logical deduction on my part demonstrates the danger of these machines.

    I am never going to trust mechanical, computerized hands around my head and neck. Even shaking hands with one of these mechanical Monsters can be dangerous.

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, because I'm sure they spent extra money on motors with that amount of power in them. Seriously, do people worry that the little electric wheeled toys from McDonald's will go flying accross the room and put a hole in someone's leg???

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...aaand this is how you know that you must stop watching Robocop reruns

    3. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Never cross your fingers near it. It will go into hairpiece mode.

    4. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by AHuxley · · Score: 0, Troll

      Someone could mod it for short repetitive, vertical 'washing'
      If it runs MS, it could get the next get "Stuxnet" and wash too much.
      A trip to the ER for "reattachment".

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. Look at the size of that thing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you lack the dexterity to wash your own hair, how would you go about moving a garbage can sized robot on wheels with a matching steel framed solid based chair?

    This would probably be more useful in hair dressing salons ... u know, 1 less wage, 1 expensive robot.

    1. Re:Look at the size of that thing! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Look how big version one of anything is - computers, radios, portable phones, and so on. Then look at how big they are a few years later. Give this a decade, and it will be small enough that you can just clip it onto the shower and have it wash your hair. Still not as good as having another human in the shower with you (well, I guess that could depend on the human...), but probably a step up from washing your own hair.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  12. Problem solved? by cbope · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One has to wonder... exactly what problem does this solve? In order for this to be successful commercially, it will have to cost less than the equivalent of paying someone to do the washing by hand. If you look at automatic hair driers which are fairly common in hair salons, it makes sense, because the cost of the machine is low compared to paying someone to do the job. This on the other hand I can't see ever being cost effective; the cost of the robotics, software and safety considerations are too high to make it commercially viable. Neat idea but hardly a successful, sellable product.

    1. Re:Problem solved? by jackbird · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Healthcare/rehabilitation settings. People with limited mobility or missing limbs.

    2. Re:Problem solved? by vlad30 · · Score: 1

      This only applies when you can get cheap labour i.e. a teenager that wants this job and has dropped out of school, these days they are all to good for that or at least smart enough to realise while still in school the parents are willing to pay the bills. In the caregiver scenario this would need to occur during school hours, limiting available workforce.

      --
      Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
    3. Re:Problem solved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, it's got 16 fingers! Do you know how hard it is sourcing hairdressers with those credentials outside the immediate vicinity of Chernobyl and Pripyat?

    4. Re:Problem solved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One has to wonder... exactly what problem does this solve?"

      Japan has an aging population. Soon there will be more people requiring a carer than the number of available carers.

    5. Re:Problem solved? by CrashandDie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. We heard the same kind of critics when the electric wheelchairs came out, saying that they would cost more than hiring someone to push the person around.

      Truth is that if this means a carer can take care of another patient during the 20-40 minutes this machine is massaging disabled person A, then that's 40-80 minutes gained; or some 10-20GBP. If this machine is installed in a home or institute, that would conservatively account for some 60GBP a day.

      Not so ludicrous after all.

    6. Re:Problem solved? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem it solves is potentially avoiding hiring foreigners with Japan's declining birth rate.

    7. Re:Problem solved? by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The total sum is probably much higher, because this is aimed at Japanese market, where people are aging rapidly, while immigration laws are some tightest in the world.

      As a result, there simply aren't enough workers to deal with the aged, typically at least partially disabled people. So the money has been thrown at robotics to do most of the carer's work instead. This is one of the examples.

    8. Re:Problem solved? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      People age faster in Japan? Lots of Japanese cougars...

    9. Re:Problem solved? by fabioalcor · · Score: 1

      And people with terminal laziness.

    10. Re:Problem solved? by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      1. Stick it in a high priced salon.

      2. Charge extra for fancy robot wash

      3. Profit!

      No ??? step needed.

  13. Wallace and Gromit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason you don't see Wallace with one of these is that the guy doesn't have any hair.

  14. 16 fingers? by zrbyte · · Score: 1

    Not that's what I call multitouch! Does it run iOS 4.2?

  15. I want 16 robotic fingers to rub/tickle my back by mykos · · Score: 1

    Do you hear me panasonic? I like the hair washing machine, but I'd love relaxing instasleep more...ahhh...

  16. A hair-washing robot... by bob5972 · · Score: 1

    ...because washing your own hair is just too hard.

    1. Re:A hair-washing robot... by c0lo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Try do it with a missing limb. Or with atrocious artritical pains.
      Then read carefuly the TFA. Actually, contrary to the /. customes, you may start reading the TFA until you hit: "to assist caregivers in hospitals and health-care facilities".

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:A hair-washing robot... by ecorona · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is if you have musculary dsytrophy. Besides, robotics research will definitely help society in general in the future. Think big picture.

  17. This is progress by vidnet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's with all the comments saying that this is a silly/stupid/worthless invention? Panasonic has automated a dull task previously reserved exclusively for unskilled human labourers! This is /., when did we start longing for the manual human elements of mindless, repetitive work?

    I, for one, wish Panasonic all the best in automating everyday tasks. I don't think I've seen a new machine to help with day-to-day life since the post office got an electronic stamp dispenser ten years ago. This is supposed to be the future!

    When this thing has been field tested and gone down in price, you can probably find them at your local hairdresser's. Am I the only who'd like a two hour head massage for a handful of quarters?

    1. Re:This is progress by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      There is another angle in this. To many lonely elderly, things like these are their primary human contact. Think about it for a moment - do you really want to spend your retirement after your spouse dies in solitude, cared only by machines?

      Because this is where this kind of progress is openly headed. It essentially ignores your psychological needs, and focuses on just taking care of the body.

    2. Re:This is progress by Jed32 · · Score: 1

      Devices like this will provide positive reinforcement to the skeptical, that automated devices work just as well as anything a human can provide. So that one day later down the road, people will be willing to trust their lives with more advanced automation. ie. dentistry/open heart surgery/brain surgery.

    3. Re:This is progress by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      For some of us the hairdresser's boobs almost pressed against our faces as she washes our hair--rhythmically, soapily, passionately!--is the the most female contact we get in the month. What's next, replacing phone-sex operators with Turing machines?

    4. Re:This is progress by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      To many lonely elderly, things like these are their primary human contact.

      Even if it's not the primary contact, it's value still lies in its humanity. I have a great aunt who just turned 100 last month. She still gets her hair done regularly at the retirement home where she lives, but somehow I don't think she would be so interested in it if a machine performed the service. This tells me that once the robot gets to the US, it wiIl save money two ways: By elminating a worker, and by decreasing demand for the service while still keeping up the appearance of care. I do understand Japan's cultural reasons for this kind of invention.

    5. Re:This is progress by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you keep talking about your mother?

  18. its a cover... by ckeo · · Score: 1

    They are really doing research for the sex toy industry... and testing the technology on body parts that are less easily injured.

    1. Re:its a cover... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my first thought. Then came robotic masseuses and physical therapists, in that order.

  19. The Big Bang Theory... by ekran · · Score: 5, Informative

    This, and its usage, was pretty much covered in the latest episode of The Big Bang Theory.

    1. Re:The Big Bang Theory... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      You know, there are those of us who don't watch network sitcoms? What a frame of reference, there, eh?

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:The Big Bang Theory... by pablo_max · · Score: 1

      I was gonna say the same thing!
      I also hope they can make a robot hand for cleaning fat americans. They seem to have a hard time to reach their own asses whilst in the shower. Thanks in advance Panasonic!

    3. Re:The Big Bang Theory... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You know, there are those of us who don't watch network sitcoms? What a frame of reference, there, eh?

      I don't watch that shit either, but I recognize that there are a number of people on Slashdot who do, and they might enjoy a pointer if they don't watch them so slavishly that they saw it already.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:The Big Bang Theory... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And with 16 fingers, it'll be a Big Bang Machine.

  20. Somebody's gotta say it... by hyades1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Within 10 minutes of this thing going on sale to the public, somebody's gonna have their dick in it.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    1. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by ckeo · · Score: 1

      Then sue because there was no warning label. :/

    2. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by mysidia · · Score: 3, Funny

      They can re-use the chatroulette genitalia detection algorithms, with some touch sensors added, to prevent that dangerous use, perhaps?

    3. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by hyades1 · · Score: 1

      LOL...really. Thanks for a good laugh. You nailed it. And realistically, what company wouldn't think it's going to happen sooner rather than later?

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    4. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or write a program and add some accessories to make it really work? ;)

    5. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      They can re-use the chatroulette genitalia detection algorithms, with some touch sensors added, to prevent that dangerous use, perhaps?

      Not if they want to sell to the slashdot crowd.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by ckeo · · Score: 1

      Are you volunteering for the beta testing ? :P

    7. Re:Somebody's gotta say it... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Within 10 minutes of this thing going on sale to the public, somebody's gonna have their dick in it.

      New corporate slogan?

      "Panasonic. Because you're the kind of guy who would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddamned courtesy to give him a reach-around."

  21. A Million Prostates Cry Out At Once.. BEN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    imagine the possibilities for this invention for prostate cancer screenings!

  22. Do you expect me to get my hair washed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No mister Bond... I expect you to die.

  23. Maybe it's also about gaining xperience by Acetylane_Rain · · Score: 1

    When this thing has been field tested and gone down in price...

    I think this is the point of a lot of non-portable high-technology. You manufacture them to gain experience because maybe, just maybe, there'll soon be a market for robot servers. I mean, look at electric cars. There are a lot of companies trying to make one, and yet it's less profitable (if at all) than the standard gas/diesel models.

    Japan has a rapidly aging population, so having a significant, if not exactly huge market, for service industry robots is by no means a long shot. Perhaps the future will be one robot to do them all, cut and wash your hair, give you a massage and perhaps, uhm, other things. But who knows, maybe specialist robots will be the rule. One robot to wash you hair, another to cut it, still another to give you a mani/pedicure.

  24. A failure to understand the buying process by mbstone · · Score: 1

    Your wife or GF doesn't go to the salon just to get clean hair. She goes to get out of the house. She goes to interact and gossip with the other people there. This device will sit unused no matter how effective it is in deterging oil and dirt from hair.

    1. Re:A failure to understand the buying process by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Your wife or GF doesn't go to the salon just to get clean hair. She goes to get out of the house. She goes to interact and gossip with the other people there. This device will sit unused no matter how effective it is in deterging oil and dirt from hair.

      What about the occasions when she doesn't have time to go to the salon, or it's closed, or booked up? She can sit and watch TV, read, whatever while the machine does its thing. Anyhow, I get the impression that most women don't go to the salon *just* to have their hair washed, it's usually mostly when they want a colour or cut etc. as well.

  25. Article title by a_claudiu · · Score: 1

    For once the summary of the article on /. is less sensational than article itself. From the article title "Panasonic unleashes 16-finger, hair washing robot" you'll expect Panasonic released a horde of 16 finger robots wandering on the streets looking to hair wash innocent victims in a "Thing" manner.

  26. Can you look down it's shirt? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    ... or admire the figure-hugging white coat as it fusses over you. If not, I'm not interested.

    --
    No sig today...
  27. If you really want to make some money... by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Invent a hand-job machine.

    With 16 fingers...

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:If you really want to make some money... by crabel · · Score: 1

      I just slipped and fell into it...

    2. Re:If you really want to make some money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two fingers are enough... :-(

    3. Re:If you really want to make some money... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Invent a hand-job machine.

      With 16 fingers...

      This is a really predictable place for this conversation to go, but I can't help but think it would be easier to make a convincing blowjob machine. I've never known a woman to give a handjob worth a damn and I have a hard time thinking a robot could pull it off.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:If you really want to make some money... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never "known" a woman.

      Fixed that for you.

  28. That's the point by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    These robots obey the three laws, so one won't ever go bezerk and crush the skull of a human...

    I think that's precisely the point. It must be relatively easy to just not give the robot enough strength to harm a skull. So, you get a almost completely safe robot that handle's people's heads.

    Five years later, the population becomes ready to accept robots in their homes. This is but a stepping stone to make people feel safe:

    Head wash -> back massage -> chiropraxis -> open heart operations -> brain tumor removal -> handjob.

    1. Re:That's the point by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 1

      As Howard Wolowitz learned on the big bang theory it is important to not skip steps.

    2. Re:That's the point by fitteschleiker · · Score: 1

      Head wash -> back massage -> chiropraxis -> open heart operations -> brain tumor removal -> handjob.

      umm. I think I can speak for all present when I say we are more than comfortable with that handjob being available right now.

    3. Re:That's the point by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      As much as I enjoyed that episode -- it was the first time in awhile I literally LOLed several times through the episode -- they really went for the low hanging fruit (No pun intended) with that gag. I mean, who didn't see it coming (not here, either) a mile away as soon as it showed up in the prelude (or whatever those Hollywood types call the scene that comes before the opening credit sequence)?

    4. Re:That's the point by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      Head wash -> back massage -> chiropraxis -> open heart operations -> brain tumor removal -> handjob.

      umm. I think I can speak for all present when I say we are more than comfortable with that handjob being available right now.

      You think wrong.

    5. Re:That's the point by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Head wash -> back massage -> chiropraxis -> open heart operations -> brain tumor removal -> handjob.

      umm. I think I can speak for all present when I say we are more than comfortable with that handjob being available right now.

      Ok; you put your stuff in the iron grip.

      I'll keep it in my pants until I've seen it do neurosurgery on the president during an earthquake.

    6. Re:That's the point by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Damn, I came to this thread JUST to make a Howard Wolowitz reference.

  29. I wonder ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this thing will beat my stunningly looking hair dresser who massages my head while washing it, asks me whether it's not too hot and says that my hair is so beautiful while she plays through it with her hands looking at me in the mirror with those big bambi eyes of her.

  30. Malware on this thing could get really nasty .. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    Whenever I see fairly powerful human-interaction-robots like these I can't help myself but think of the possibilities of malice with one of those.
    Take this one for instance: Imagine this one with a virus on it that reprograms it to crush your skull instead of gently massaging it.
    I wouldn't want to use one, not only because of this, but for reasons I'll mention in another comment as well.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Malware on this thing could get really nasty .. by Yetihehe · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Crushing a skull requires too much force, which such robot probably wouldn't have. It is easier to push it's fingers through your eyes ;)

      --
      Extreme Programming - Redundant Array of Inexpensive Developers
  31. Please let it have a web interface by zentext · · Score: 1

    A web interface, a sensible OS, scriptable application code, and a few security holes. Endless potential for laughs. Meanwhile, I'm still waiting for a back scratching AI. Never mind chatting through a terminal Mr Turing, when I can't tell if it's a machine or human giving me a back scratch, I'll accept that AI is really here.

  32. Soon to be available ... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    unofficial hack so that it will 'wash' your pubes.

  33. Xenophobic society full of retirees by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reasons why Japanese build all these robots to deal with everyday stuff are two-fold: 1: the population is getting older, more people needed for elderly care, 2: reluctance to hire in foreign people to do that work, basically a xenophobic society getting more and more full of retired people.

    This makes robot solutions bloom.

    And note: I'm not saying it's a bad thing. Let's get more robots to do manufacturing, so we can do it locally and don't need to ship inferior junk from China.

    1. Re:Xenophobic society full of retirees by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The reasons why Japanese build all these robots to deal with everyday stuff are two-fold: 1: the population is getting older, more people needed for elderly care, 2: reluctance to hire in foreign people to do that work, basically a xenophobic society getting more and more full of retired people.

      Where are they supposed to put all these people? How are they supposed to feed them? Japan is already stuffed to the max and has to import the majority of its food. Xenophobic? Maybe. But it's not clear what the alternative is.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  34. I don't want no robot washing my hair. by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    I don't want a robot washing my hair. I'll either do it myself or - as a viable alternative - I'll have that cute hairdresser with that sexy grundge outfit and the punky rasta hairdo with scissors and comb tattooed on to her arm (!) wash my hair after cutting it. I bet I could get like 10 000 haircuts + washing from her for the price of that robot. ... This robot must be a insanely expensive maintenance nightmare - and it's no where nearly as attractive as aforementioned hairdresser.

    Seeing this reminds me of the fact that it's not only always software developers endeavoring on notably harebrained (no pun intended) ideas.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  35. You are all ignoring the most important question by Michael_gr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will we have to tip the robot, and if so, how? Does it accept batteries?

  36. Perry Bible Fellowship already did it by soliptic · · Score: 1
  37. Obligatory... by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  38. The best by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    models are pink and have rainbows on them

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  39. Robot barber by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just remembered an old joke:

    So they bring out a new machine to cut hair, it's a box with a hole in it, you stick your head inside and it cuts the hair.
    Somebody asked a question: -But everyone's head is different.

    The answer was this: -Only for the first time.

    1. Re:Robot barber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Q: How do you like your hair cut?
      A: In silence.

    2. Re:Robot barber by neminem · · Score: 1

      > they bring out a new machine to cut hair, it's a box with a hole in it

      1. Cut a hole in the box
      2. ???
      3. Profit?

  40. Can you turn the chair around? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    16 Fingers, eh? If you can turn that chair around we might be in business....

  41. I'll pass by ParkedStar · · Score: 1

    Every time I'd lay my head back down into that thing I'd feel like I'm about to have root canal.

    --
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -Albert Einstein
  42. A Japanense robot that isn't humanoid? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Amazing.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  43. No thank you by Ceiynt · · Score: 1

    Any ever see Wall-E and what happens when the make-up robot went bonkers? I'd like to not have one with 16 fingers around my skull. No thank you robot overlords.

  44. So the robot counts in... by gblackwo · · Score: 1

    Base 16?

  45. Not quite OSHA certified... by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    Panasonic hasn't provided a launch date for any of the robots. An obstacle to their commercialization likes in the lack of safety standards and liability laws concerning robots that interact with humans. Clarification is needed on such issues before the robots could become products, but guidelines could be published in Japan as early as 2012.

    Translation: The lawyers are hard at work on not being legally liable when the machines start ripping off heads and gouging eyes out?

  46. No way by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

    That thing looks unnervingly like the rolling trash can in my garage.

  47. sooo by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

    We have a $20k machine that does what a person could do in about 30 seconds? Or could be resolved for weeks with a beard trimmer in under a 60 seconds? This looks like a problem that wasn't needing a solution.

    1. Re:sooo by Fartypants · · Score: 1

      We have a $20k machine that does what a person could do in about 30 seconds? Or could be resolved for weeks with a beard trimmer in under a 60 seconds? This looks like a problem that wasn't needing a solution.

      According to the article, the robot was developed to assist caregivers in hospitals and health-care facilities. So, yes, it is a completely useless and overpriced machine but it will be paid for by the taxpayers so it should end up being a big money maker for Panasonic.

    2. Re:sooo by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Hospital employees are generally well paid compared to hairdressers. If the machine can save $5.00 per wash and do 1,000 washings per year it will pay for itself in about five years.

      Might make more sense to look for alternative ways to wash hair, though.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    3. Re:sooo by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      or, like I said, a beard trimmer.

  48. In other news... by chargen · · Score: 1

    Still no cure for cancer.

  49. I expected no less.. by formfeed · · Score: 1

    ..from a planet that was colonized by hair stylists and phone sanitizers.

  50. Video by antdude · · Score: 1

    Here's a video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tb627xDlqBs BBT rocks.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  51. Motorcycle wreck injuries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I broke my right arm and shoulder in a motorcycle wreck.

    Taking a shower and washing my hair one-armed was quite painful for several weeks until I was healed up somewhat.

    And if that wasn't bad enough, try wiping your ass after a dump, with TP in your left hand when you're right handed and can't use your right arm due to it being broken and in a brace. Compound this problem with having lots of diarrhea caused by large doses of ibuprofen for the pain of your broken bones.

    Fun city indeed. :-/

  52. This is the same question I had by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    How could this thing possibly be cost effective? The stylist at your favorite hair place does the same job for not a very big salary, and he/she can do a lot of other stuff too. I can't help but think these things are mostly publicity stunts, although there's presumably some valuable experience to be gained in solving hard (for robots) problems.

    1. Re:This is the same question I had by godel_56 · · Score: 1

      How could this thing possibly be cost effective? The stylist at your favorite hair place does the same job for not a very big salary, and he/she can do a lot of other stuff too. I can't help but think these things are mostly publicity stunts, although there's presumably some valuable experience to be gained in solving hard (for robots) problems.

      If you, and others with similar posts, would RTFA you'd see the technology is aimed at hospitals and nursing homes and such, where adequate staffing is always a problem.

    2. Re:This is the same question I had by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      How could this thing possibly be cost effective? The stylist at your favorite hair place does the same job for not a very big salary, and he/she can do a lot of other stuff too. I can't help but think these things are mostly publicity stunts, although there's presumably some valuable experience to be gained in solving hard (for robots) problems.

      If you, and others with similar posts, would RTFA you'd see the technology is aimed at hospitals and nursing homes and such, where adequate staffing is always a problem.

      Actually, adequate staffing isn't really the problem ... there are more than enough capable people to handle the work. What has happened (at least in the U.S.) is that most of those facilities have been bought out by big companies who run them for profit, solely for profit, at the expense of both the caregivers and the patients. It's insane: a decent nursing home will run you a sixty to a hundred grand a year. And what do you get for that? One RN on duty (if you're lucky), a few overworked CNAs and a room. All the hype your read about skilled nursing facilities is just that: hype. Staff levels and quality have been cut to the minimum in recent years. What usually happens is that (often at night) a resident of one of these places has an accident, and the reason they had that accident is because there were two or three CNAs on a floor with fifty or sixty residents. Then the families get involved, lawsuits are filed, maybe there's an out-of-court settlement, and more staff is hired. Then, over time, the staff levels are cut back until the next "accident" happens. It's a sick system, and I want absolutely no part of it.

      I've known a number of people over the years who just took some of their assets, bought a two-bedroom condominium (the second room for their caregiver) and retired there. With the money they save from living in a regular nursing home they can hire full-time caregivers dedicated just to them, they have control over the people who are taking care of them, and generally end up in a much better situation. They get to leave more of their assets to the children when they die, and now instead of spending everything on a bloodsucking nursing home, they are building up some equity.

      It didn't used to be this way, but a lot has changed in the past couple of decades. Frankly, if these robots can be used improve a resident's quality of life, I'd say go for it. The problem is, the homes will never go for it: they're all about money, most of them (there are good ones, but they're rare) and are unlikely to make the investment.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  53. Clearly by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    This thing is going to be too expensive for able-bodied people to have in their home - if you have full use of your body, washing your hair is easy, and this thing would have to cost, what, thousands of dollars? The only use I can imagine is in hair salons and assisted living places. So your wife would still get to go out and interact with people... just not with the hair washer.