Slashdot Mirror


Comic Sales Soar After Artist Engages 4chan Pirates

An anonymous reader writes "Steve Lieber, the artist behind the graphic novel Underground, discovered that someone on 4chan had scanned and posted the entire comic. Rather than complaining, he joined the conversation, chatting with the 4channers about the comic... and the next day he saw his sales jump to unheard-of levels, much higher than he'd seen even when the comic book was reviewed on popular sites like Boing Boing."

231 of 305 comments (clear)

  1. Imagine that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Engaging your customer base is good for business...

    1. Re:Imagine that! by Shikaku · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Something the RIAA/MPAA will never learn.

    2. Re:Imagine that! by erroneus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They might... they just might. The fact is, they need to read the book "Raving Fans." When your customers are your fans, they will overlook higher prices, problems with delivery and all sorts of things with the exception of poor quality and/or poor service.

    3. Re:Imagine that! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Engaging your customer base is good for business...

      People looking for entertainment spend more money when they have more fun. That's one of the main reasons actual losses due to piracy aren't calculatable.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:Imagine that! by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Engaging customer base = good. However, simply because something works on the micro level doesn't mean it scales to the macro level. I somehow doubt that having hundreds of artists flood 4chan would result in all of them getting increases in sales.

      It is kind of like "if i stand up at a baseball game I can see better, therefore if everyone stands up at the baseball game everyone can see better".

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Imagine that! by Allicorn · · Score: 1

      It's not a customer base, it's a treasure island.

      --
      OMG!!! Ponies!!!
    6. Re:Imagine that! by denis-The-menace · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They already use lawyers and Congress to "engage" their customer base. why do it directly?

      Their true customers are the shareholders of the companies that are member of the MAFIAA, not consumers.

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    7. Re:Imagine that! by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Engaging customer base = good. However, simply because something works on the micro level doesn't mean it scales to the macro level. I somehow doubt that having hundreds of artists flood 4chan would result in all of them getting increases in sales.

      If this were a new thing you might have a point. However, in Japan they have their own equivalent of comic-con and people make their own fan-zines and sell them for a profit. It's technically illegal but they never get shut down. The reason is that excitement over a franchise is still excitement over a franchise. This was known over 10 years ago but nobody over here is paying attention to it. It's amusing to me because the same country that's known for its $4 cups of coffee is under the impression people will go to extremes to avoid paying money for stuff.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    8. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is one of the reasons why I release all the music I make on last.fm and in a torrent...both of which will be freely available and supported by me when the time comes to put my stuff up for sale.

      Granted, I'm not trying to make a living off it, but still...the more access people have to it...

    9. Re:Imagine that! by DaveAtWorkAnnoyingly · · Score: 1

      It's amazing that it's taken this long for this very simple fact to be realised.

      Engage your customer base, don't prosecute them...

      Make good products, the customers will come... Simples...

    10. Re:Imagine that! by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      It seems like whenever this conversation comes up, someone posts "I would like to listen to music from artists who do this, but I can't find any" or similar.

      In the interest of giving them a lead, and letting us here your stuff, care to post a link to your own work?

    11. Re:Imagine that! by Dalzhim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well you just contradicted yourself. They won't if it won't get their customers to overlook poor quality and/or poor service...

    12. Re:Imagine that! by jgtg32a · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Implying that dragging people to court isn't engaging

    13. Re:Imagine that! by djrosen · · Score: 1

      See link in his sig, or incase you hide them:

      http://livingwithanerd.com/

    14. Re:Imagine that! by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, Japan has what we'd consider some rather draconian copyright laws. Copying data even for personal use has been ruled infringing, and folks have been arrested for sharing television shows on P2P networks. I can't help but wonder how this might have played out in 2chan.

    15. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Here you go. Look in the "shout" section for a link to the torrent.

      It's all a combination of spacey ambient ("Transient Unknown" project), drone ("Implied Reality" project), and chilled-out head nodding stuff ("Lost on the Way to the Laundry" project). I have a LOT more than what is on there, but that's what I've publicly released so far.

    16. Re:Imagine that! by Dripdry · · Score: 1

      Ah, but as shares concentrate into the hands of the few and powerful,but sales dwindle, they will either sink or go back to their customers to actually give them something they want, yes?

      --
      -
    17. Re:Imagine that! by TrekkieGod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is one of the reasons why I release all the music I make on last.fm and in a torrent...both of which will be freely available and supported by me when the time comes to put my stuff up for sale.

      Granted, I'm not trying to make a living off it, but still...the more access people have to it...

      The article had a quote by the author that he posted on the 4chan boards that really got to me:

      As for putting all the pages up here. What can I say? I get that this is how things go, and I'm trying to live in the same decade as everyone else. If nothing else, I'm flattered that someone thought enough of the book to take the time to scan and post it.

      From that quote, I noticed two things: he didn't expect that he would get a huge boost in sales from the event, he was just kinda resigned that you can't stop piracy. However, the most important part was the whole bit about being flattered that people liked his book. Sometimes you forget this caliber of artist still exists: the guy who cares about the work more than the money. The money is nice, and I'm happy when the artists can survive and even get rich off it. However, that shouldn't be the motivation for what they do.

      So, thanks for what you do, keeping the real art alive. I went to your website, and found the links to last.fm to your music, and I will take a listen. Obviously I don't know if I'll enjoy it, but if I do, you can count me on your list of customers as soon as they go on sale.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

    18. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

      One other thing: be sure to listen to it with headphones! It's been mixed with that intention...you can use "regular" speakers, but a lot of the dynamics are lost.

    19. Re:Imagine that! by veganboyjosh · · Score: 1

      Will check it out, thanks!

    20. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thanks! That's basically why I do it...it's something that I really enjoy. I make music that I personally want to listen to. While there aren't many people that share my tastes, there are at least some out there :-)

      I'd suggest starting with the "Lost on the Way to the Laundry" stuff (only two tracks up there at the moment)...it's the most accessible.

    21. Re:Imagine that! by gumbi+west · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      It's kind of like how you can see over the other cars if you drive and SUV. But if everyone got an SUV, then you are back in the original situation but now everyone pays more for gas per mile.

      There, fixed it. BTW, what is baseball, and why don't people do it here in my mother's basement?

    22. Re:Imagine that! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      If Congress is forcibly engaging their customer base, how do you propose that sales will "dwindle"?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    23. Re:Imagine that! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      I think you're mistaking short-sightedness, foolishness, and incompetence for malice. Mostly the MAFIAA is made up of a bunch of poor businessmen who haven't realized that this isn't the 1950s anymore.

    24. Re:Imagine that! by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      The ONLY reason I pay the prices to see movies in a theatre is to saturate my popcorn with advanced butter substitute. Oh, and that cheese powder.

      If they screw up the popcorn, I would just as soon go to Redbox or Netflix.

      And I might, just might, live an extra year. Then again, maybe not, since at home I can have a brot instead.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    25. Re:Imagine that! by zill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The last time RIAA "engaged" me I was forced to pay $6000 and sign a stack of paper half my height.

    26. Re:Imagine that! by zill · · Score: 2, Funny

      >implying this is 4chan

    27. Re:Imagine that! by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      I'm curious do you say this because a lot of people tend to have better quality headphones than computer speakers or do the headphones still make a big difference even if a high quality speaker setup is used?

    28. Re:Imagine that! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Well, to correct myself, they are malicious, but the malice is in structuring all of their business deals to rip *everyone* off. I just don't think the anti-piracy campaign is a new or interesting form of malice, but rather a failure to understand the position their industry is in.

    29. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For what I make, I'd take a crappy set of headphones over a nice set of speakers any day. The way textures are layered and placed, a LOT of the directional dynamics rely on having speakers strapped over or in your ears. You can listen to it through regular speakers just fine, but you'll be missing out on a LOT of the details...even on a high-end set (again, it's all about layering and positioning.)

    30. Re:Imagine that! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >> Something the RIAA/MPAA will never learn.
      > They might... they just might.

      This depends entirely on what you think the RIAA is doing. I don't believe, based on their activities, that they are interested in merely increasing profit. They seem to be about _control_ of the content. Their long-term goal is increasing profit, sure, but I'm pretty sure they want to entirely control the content, end-to-end, for their long-term benefit.

      You listen to a song on the radio, the ratio station pays, and you probably pay for the ability to listen to it digitally, too. You hear Happy Birthday at a birthday party, somebody's gotta pay. You want to use a 5 second snippet of a song on your kid's soccer game video, you gotta pay. You play grandma's favorite song at her wake, gotta pay. Can't read the lyrics online unless you pay. Want to cover someone else's song in a free video online? Show us the money. Sample a song with your smartphone so you can go buy it online - gotta pay for that sample before you can go buy the song. Sorry, buy the right to play the song for your own individual self on that particular device you downloaded it to. Gotta pay, can't move it to another device, no stripping the DRM off it so you can even MOVE it to another device. Gotta pay.

      BITCH BETTER HAVE MY MONEY!

    31. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 1

      That's exactly why I make it, though! It's not impossible, but finding the kind of stuff that I like can be quite a chore. I finally broke down and decided to just make it myself. I played Clarinet, French Horn, and Piano when I was younger, so I already understand music theory and structure...all I had to do was learn how to use the tools, and away I went!

      Besides, considering what I like to listen to is such a small niche, I felt I should contribute something back to the subculture that has given me so much.

    32. Re:Imagine that! by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can get a relatively cheap pair of headphones that will isolate well, thus reducing the noise floor in your environment, or you can spend thousands building a high quality stereo in an insulated room that is set aside for listening.

      Which one do you think most people have access to?

    33. Re:Imagine that! by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Or the forward to any of Cory Doctorow's books. From Makers:

      There's a dangerous group of anti-copyright activists out there who pose a clear and present danger to the future of authors and publishing. They have no respect for property or laws. What's more, they're powerful and organized, and have the ears of lawmakers and the press.

      I'm speaking, of course, of the legal departments at ebook publishers.

      These people don't believe in copyright law. Copyright law says that when you buy a book, you own it. You can give it away, you can lend it, you can pass it on to your descendants or donate it to the local homeless shelter. Owning books has been around for longer than publishing books has. Copyright law has always recognized your right to own your books. When copyright laws are made -- by elected officials, acting for the public good -- they always safeguard this right.

      But ebook publishers don't respect copyright law, and they don't believe in your right to own property. Instead, they say that when you "buy" an ebook, you're really only licensing that book, and that copyright law is superseded by the thousands of farcical, abusive words in the license agreement you click through on the way to sealing the deal. (Of course, the button on their website says, "Buy this book" and they talk about "Ebook sales" at conferences -- no one says, "License this book for your Kindle" or "Total licenses of ebooks are up from 0.00001% of all publishing to 0.0001% of all publishing, a 100-fold increase!")

      I say to hell with them. You bought it, you own it. I believe in copyright law's guarantee of ownership in your books.

      So you own this ebook. The license agreement (see below), is from Creative Commons and it gives you even more rights than you get to a regular book. Every word of it is a gift, not a confiscation. Enjoy.

      What do I want from you in return? Read the book. Tell your friends. Review it on Amazon or at your local bookseller. Bring it to your bookclub. Assign it to your students (older students, please -- that sex scene is a scorcher) (now I've got your attention, don't I?). As Woody Guthrie wrote:

      "This song is Copyrighted in U.S., under Seal of Copyright #154085, for a period of 28 years, and anybody caught singin' it without our permission, will be mighty good friends of ourn, cause we don't give a dern. Publish it. Write it. Sing it. Swing to it. Yodel it. We wrote it, that's all we wanted to do."

      Oh yeah. Also: if you like it, buy it or donate a copy to a worthy, cash-strapped institution.

      Why am I doing this? Because my problem isn't piracy, it's obscurity (thanks, @timoreilly for this awesome aphorism). Because free ebooks sell print books. Because I copied my ass off when I was 17 and grew up to spend practically every discretionary cent I have on books when I became an adult. Because I can't stop you from sharing it (zeroes and ones aren't ever going to get harder to copy); and because readers have shared the books they loved forever; so I might as well enlist you to the cause.

      Emphasis mine. Oh, and BTW, the book is available for free at the linked page, in many ereader formats. It's a pretty good read, except he uses too many hyphens (parking-lot, shopping-center, etc)

    34. Re:Imagine that! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      The same can be said of producing a high-quality product. Producing a high-quality product will be much less impressive if everyone produces high-quality products, but that doesn't mean its a bad idea.

      And who says we need this to scale? If a bunch of artists producing good products and engaging with their customers can't scale, then it's because the market isn't big enough to support them all. Oh well, too bad. Looks like we'll only get the artists that we need, and we won't have an enormous bloated bureaucratic cartel that attacks its own customers. What a shame.

    35. Re:Imagine that! by Local+ID10T · · Score: 1

      I can't say that I'd go so far as to join a conversation on 4-chan, but it's not hard to understand that talking to your fans instead of bashing them is the better sales strategy.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    36. Re:Imagine that! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      here's a start.

    37. Re:Imagine that! by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Actually, once I've interacted with a web comic artist online, particularly with email or facebook (I don't go to Cons or other places where I'm likely to have to deal with people in the flesh), I'm way more likely to buy their merchandise and hit their pay-pal button. The authors go from being a blank face to being an individual.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    38. Re:Imagine that! by socz · · Score: 1

      Somewhat related, I finally posted 4 of almost complete songs on my blog if you or anyone else is interested! One day I'll finish them... one day!

      And on another note, I found a bag of tapes that have the other part of the songs lol. But now I don't even have a tape player, so I'll have to go dig one up from??????

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    39. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 1

      Nice, I'll be sure to check it out when I get home! I love discovering "at-home" musicians...most of what I listen to nowadays is made by people like that.

    40. Re:Imagine that! by trapnest · · Score: 2, Funny

      >implying it's not

    41. Re:Imagine that! by AltairDusk · · Score: 1

      Interesting, I hadn't thought about the placement of the sound source. I'm not an audiophile by any means but I do try to make sure I have decent speakers and headphones available as I love music. I'll check it out when I'm home sometime, thanks!

    42. Re:Imagine that! by digitig · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

      It's kind of like how you can see over the other cars if you drive and SUV. But if everyone got an SUV, then you are back in the original situation but now everyone pays more for gas per mile.

      There, fixed it. BTW, what is baseball, and why don't people do it here in my mother's basement?

      But they do drive SUVs in your mother's basement? That's a hell of a basement!

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    43. Re:Imagine that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why yes, yes it is. Politeness and courtesy can work wonders. (Even with people that you'd have a good reason to have issues with.)

      Yet most businesses would rather enrage their customers instead. Following the more typical model, the author would have been a dick and eventually get his internet DoS'd.

      Maybe business majors and legal types should do a case study of stuff like this and learn something.

    44. Re:Imagine that! by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "One other thing: be sure to listen to it with headphones! It's been mixed with that intention...you can use "regular" speakers, but a lot of the dynamics are lost."

      This just struck me as kind of curious. Why would you mix for headphones primarily?

      Is it because more people today don't invest a decent amount of money for a good home system with quality amps and speakers? Is the majority of the audience (granted, I'm a bit older) only listening to things on cheap earbuds on iPods? I prefer to get as good a copy as I can for the home system, then move to a lossy format for transportability for listening to the iPods which are only for poor listening environments like the gym, the car, or on the streetcar..etc.

      Just curious as to why you specifically mix for headphones. Would a good stereo mix for good home system not sound as good on quality headphones or earbuds?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:Imagine that! by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Baseball is an old boring game that is almost exactly not like cricket.

    46. Re:Imagine that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have learned, they've just learned the wrong way. Viral videos, torrents posted by music execs; they're in the "pirate" community, and manipulating it to increase their sales. They're just not smart enough to know that eventually the masses will wise up and stop falling for their ruse.

    47. Re:Imagine that! by Intrinsic · · Score: 1

      This is one of the reasons why I release all the music I make on last.fm and in a torrent...both of which will be freely available and supported by me when the time comes to put my stuff up for sale.

      Granted, I'm not trying to make a living off it, but still...the more access people have to it...

      The article had a quote by the author that he posted on the 4chan boards that really got to me:

      As for putting all the pages up here. What can I say? I get that this is how things go, and I'm trying to live in the same decade as everyone else. If nothing else, I'm flattered that someone thought enough of the book to take the time to scan and post it.

      From that quote, I noticed two things: he didn't expect that he would get a huge boost in sales from the event, he was just kinda resigned that you can't stop piracy. However, the most important part was the whole bit about being flattered that people liked his book. Sometimes you forget this caliber of artist still exists: the guy who cares about the work more than the money. The money is nice, and I'm happy when the artists can survive and even get rich off it. However, that shouldn't be the motivation for what they do.

      So, thanks for what you do, keeping the real art alive. I went to your website, and found the links to last.fm to your music, and I will take a listen. Obviously I don't know if I'll enjoy it, but if I do, you can count me on your list of customers as soon as they go on sale.

      My sentiments exactly. You know the U.S. has fucked up priorities when the majority of the population puts the focus on benefits and returns as apposed to allowing your good will and creativity to drive your living. Money is a byproduct of what you do that benefits the human race.

    48. Re:Imagine that! by zill · · Score: 2, Informative

      >implying implications

    49. Re:Imagine that! by Pojut · · Score: 1

      From another post in this thread:

      For what I make, I'd take a crappy set of headphones over a nice set of speakers any day. The way textures are layered and placed, a LOT of the directional dynamics rely on having speakers strapped over or in your ears.

      You can listen to my stuff on "regular" speakers, but it will just sound like a muddled mess. I enjoy playing with textures and their placement on the soundfield (as well as how they overlap or are overlapped by other sounds)...because of this, headphones are the only way to go by default. I don't apply this line of thinking to all music, just the music I put together :)

    50. Re:Imagine that! by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Steam / Valve is one of the best examples I can give. I would rather pay $5 more and get it from Steam than on the shelf.

      Are you getting paid to spew this bullshit? I have non-Steam games which autoupdate, "automatic install" is a lie, automatic configure is too (and I speak from experience) and every game I own can be installed on multiple computers.

      Steam is an attack on First Sale law.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    51. Re:Imagine that! by llamapater · · Score: 1

      i would die a happy man if 4chan became some kind of celebrity lounge thing

    52. Re:Imagine that! by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      Cory Doctorow is one of my favorite modern sci-fi authors, and I would have never heard of him if he hadn't put his work on Feedbooks for free.

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
    53. Re:Imagine that! by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      Granted, I would be getting better value for that $5, with automatic updates, automatic install and configure and the ability to easily play the game on more than one computer as long as I only played on one at a time.

      Not only that, but they protect you from cheaters even on during LAN play by requiring additional purchased copies for each computer. No other game delivery service can claim that*. Wotta bargain! ;)

      *Except those that can.

    54. Re:Imagine that! by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not being paid either, and think Steam is the greatest thing since boiling water. I simply don't buy games unless they're released on steam. In your 20's you move so many times its difficult to keep track of all your physical game copies. When you finally settle down and Have A Life, its nice to know that when you click on a game, it'll load first time. I'm too busy to keep up with patches on my own.

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    55. Re:Imagine that! by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Ah! Modern fairy tails...

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    56. Re:Imagine that! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Honestly, if 4 people are playing on a LAN, then yes, they should have 4 paid for copies. That isn't unreasonable.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    57. Re:Imagine that! by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      >>#33989444
      Nice trips, but check out my dubs.

    58. Re:Imagine that! by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      Yeah but it's all down to the training. I am sure that it wouldn't take long to make the same herd think that $4 a cup coffee is a sin and an Iranian plot

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    59. Re:Imagine that! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm too busy to keep up with patches on my own.

      Anyone too busy to patch a game is too busy to play games on a PC, buy a console. Especially since all or at least virtually all games with frequent updates have autoupdate, or at least update notification. Of course, console games have updates too, but they tend to have autoupdate these days. And since the complaint is clearly about time spent and not about downloading, it's a bullshit excuse. Patching takes moments of actual user time, and is infrequent.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    60. Re:Imagine that! by noidentity · · Score: 1

      No, they engage their customer base, just in the wrong setting (court room).

    61. Re:Imagine that! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      with the exception of poor quality and/or poor service.

      Sega can attest that they will overlook even that.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    62. Re:Imagine that! by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      It's not unreasonable but it's ineffective. When a bunch of friends come together to play games that's the best possible atmosphere you can have for introducing a new game to them and if your game requires each of them to own a copy they'll probably just fall back to something everybody already has and played to death.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    63. Re:Imagine that! by PatrickThomson · · Score: 1

      Oh please, that's asinine bullshit from someone without ties. When your free gaming time drops from 80 to 5 hours a week and your disposable income goes up by a factor of 10, that 20 minutes of patch hunting and firewall configuring is worth paying to avoid. Oh no, I can't sell my game collection! Guess I'd better keep on washing my toilet paper and eating from wheelie bins until I make up my deficit.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    64. Re:Imagine that! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      The concept of engaging your fans/customers is hardly a new thing. It's the reason Terry Pratchett blogs regularly, the reason Star Trek has conventions (complete with unlicensed fan fiction and poorly made knock-off fancy dress), and the reason why 99% of celebrities post to Twitter. Go back a century or so, before the rise of the marketing department, and it was pretty much the only method companies used to advertise their wares.

      Old fashioned concepts, such as making your product as good as you can, and respecting your customers, and dealing with people like they're proper people, are all cliche for a reason- they're good, they work, and they've always worked. And they scale perfectly well too.

      The artists associations (and other similar "industry bodies") seem to have completely disregarded all the lessons above. They want their customers to act differently, to want things they don't want, and to give them money in new and exciting ways that they've never had to before. It's the behaviour of a monopolist.

      They're acting like monopolists, but they've lost their monopoly. They could revert to tried and tested customer-winning behaviours. Instead they're haemorrhaging customers who want what they're not offering.

      Chap from TFA has demonstrated that constructive, peer-to-peer communication is a great way to get free publicity and make himself some new fans. The RIAA will either adopt the same attitude, or (after a slow and painful (for everyone involved) decline) be replaced by someone that does.

    65. Re:Imagine that! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      You'll miss your rights when they're gone. Keep spending money to have them taken away from you and see what happens. Those who would give up their rights because they are lazy are bitches, a wise man almost said that once.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    66. Re:Imagine that! by theaveng · · Score: 1

      >"I would rather pay $5 more and get it from Steam... getting better value for that $5"

      I'd say you're getting less value. Mainly because you can't sell the game if you get tired of it, or if you didn't like it. For example I bought Final Fantasy 10-2 on Disc, beat it, decided it wasn't that great, and sold it. Not only did I recoup my money, I made a 5 dollar profit.

      You can't do that with Steam or any other non-physical game.
      I'd have been out 45 dollars.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    67. Re:Imagine that! by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Mandelbrat is Soylent Green!

    68. Re:Imagine that! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Maybe. There's also the possibility that the comic had good sales simply because it was placed on 4chan, and not because he intervened. Isn't that the prevailing slashdot argument - that piracy leads to increased sales in general?

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    69. Re:Imagine that! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I haven't had any luck selling used PC games anyway, and I used to own a freaking pawnshop and even put them on Ebay. Used PC games are not the greatest selling item. Granted, I tend to hold on to games longer than many people, so they are pretty old when I get done.

      Console games are a better medium to deal with used.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    70. Re:Imagine that! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I have 50 steam games, all of them were two clicks and they installed in the background. In spite of dumb moderating, it is a fact. Almost every game I have bought auto-configures (Steam doesn't have as much control over that). I might tweak stuff but it runs fine on first click. And of course I'm not getting paid, at to even state so is pretty much FUD. MANY of us appreciate Steam and love the service. It isn't perfect, and YOU might not like everything about it, but many of us DO. They open their SDK up for mods, if you buy a bulk package that has a game that you already own, you get to GIVE the extra to a friend instead of just sucking it up.

      Do you lose First Sale? Yes. Guess what, PC games don't resell for shit unless they are still quite new, so I don't really care, and I don't remember trying to gloss over or hide that fact, nor does Steam. If you want games you can buy and sell used, buy a console or stay off Steam, no one is making you use the service.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    71. Re:Imagine that! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Do you lose First Sale? Yes. Guess what, PC games don't resell for shit unless they are still quite new, so I don't really care, and I don't remember trying to gloss over or hide that fact, nor does Steam. If you want games you can buy and sell used, buy a console or stay off Steam, no one is making you use the service.

      I lose First Sale if everyone else buys Steam-powered games and makes them more popular, too. Meanwhile you are proselytizing in its favor and saying things which simply aren't true (thanks for backpedaling on autoconfiguration though.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:Imagine that! by Heir+Of+The+Mess · · Score: 1

      Dude, you'll attract the wrath of the fans of steam. I travel so much I'm practically homeless. I have computers for a temporary amount of time. Steam is a god send, I log onto the computer, I install steam, my life's collection of games are there. Any game that isn't on steam is dead to me now.

      --
      Australian running a company that does C# / C++ / Java / SQL / Python / Mathematica
    73. Re:Imagine that! by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Something the RIAA/MPAA will never learn.

      The RIAA/MPAA aren't artists, they're middlemen. Artists directly engaging their customers is the *AA's worst nightmare, since it makes them unnecessary. That's why they fight all alternative forms of distribution tooth and nail.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    74. Re:Imagine that! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Dude, you'll attract the wrath of the fans of steam.

      Clearly I already have done. However, my wrath over being denied my rights is greater than your wrath if you cannot play your game. Any game on steam is dead to me now; and further, I will campaign against it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    75. Re:Imagine that! by Dashiva+Dan · · Score: 1

      Hehe, I used a mate at work's steam account to install Borderlands on 2 computers at my house, and coop played over LAN. All while my mate played his original copy online.
      I later bought my own copies, however Steam allowed me (through breaking the rules, sure) to try the full game in coop (LAN only) mode just fine.
      If I wanted I could have never bought the game and still be playing it on LAN without ever have paying for it.
      Any new game I want to buy I can download to both machines, go to offline mode, and test out coop before buying another copy, and I can use my mates Steam account to try out any game's he's bought before buying them myself.
      Not saying you should do this, or that it's legal, but it's both as legal and possible as the afformentioned 1 copy LAN parties were. Not reccomending you do it, but

      --
      "lt;dr" is the correct response to most of my posts.
    76. Re:Imagine that! by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 1

      What if they're somehow playing on a split-screen?

      Should I have ponied up for three extra copies of Mario Kart and Goldeneye, too?

    77. Re:Imagine that! by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      As a side note, Steam discounts 4 packs of games for their multiplayer games. And they have frequent "free weekends". And frequent 50% or more sales. And guest passes. And you can play them in internet cafes if you like. And yes, it is possible (and someone pointed out) to work around their DRM, which is weaker than most and they don't care (Gabe has stated that piracy isn't in his top 5 concerns).

      It isn't perfect, but they are more friendly than anyone else for trying out games. Most companies simply tell you to buy it, or if you MUST, then first read the reviews from "objective" gaming sites. Yes, that is a joke.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  2. Good? by whisper_jeff · · Score: 5, Funny

    4chan can use their powers for good?

    Um... I just don't know how to process that information...

    1. Re:Good? by jack2000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You do know 4chan has a big comics board right? People on it are pretty heavily into comics. If the world is out that the author cares enough to discuss with his fans the non hardcore fans will hear good things from the hardcore crowd and also buy.

    2. Re:Good? by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Insightful

      4chan can use their powers for good?

      Um... I just don't know how to process that information...

      4chan strikes me a bit more like the classic greek gods, capricious, capable of granting blessings and curses on a whim.

      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    3. Re:Good? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention, way too obsessed with sex and the human form.

    4. Re:Good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      4chan strikes me a bit more like the classic greek gods, capricious, capable of granting blessings and curses on a whim.

      Along with a steady dose of bestiality and incest.

    5. Re:Good? by X_Bones · · Score: 2, Informative

      4chan can use their powers for good?

      4chan isn't just /b/ . Some of its less-popular boards like /co/ (the comics board, where this took place) actually have, on occasion, informative and insightful discussions.

    6. Re:Good? by Even+on+Slashdot+FOE · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, he did say Greek gods, amirite?

    7. Re:Good? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They've done it before (with the Scientologists).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    8. Re:Good? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, way too obsessed with sex and the human form[?].

      You weren't reading the same greek myths I was reading. Beams of light, bulls, birds, everything but human.

    9. Re:Good? by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Informative

      Along with a steady dose of bestiality and incest.

      The classic greek gods got on with a lot of that anyway.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    10. Re:Good? by euxneks · · Score: 1

      4chan can use their powers for good?

      Um... I just don't know how to process that information...

      4chan strikes me a bit more like the classic greek gods, capricious, capable of granting blessings and curses on a whim.

      Just don't tell them that.

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    11. Re:Good? by Dalzhim · · Score: 1

      Quote-worthy.

    12. Re:Good? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      what if i sacrifice my goat?

      will 4chan bless me with more rain if i sacrifice my goat?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    13. Re:Good? by HappyHead · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what did they _do_ with those Beams of light, bulls, birds, showers of gold, swans, and other things? They obsessed over the human forms of mortals. In much the same manner that 4chan does...

    14. Re:Good? by Altus · · Score: 1

      Gods appearing as non humans and copulating with humans.

      Maybe your not reading the same 4chan that I am.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    15. Re:Good? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      So a troll of my troll is my friend? Or is that more like when a couple of barons of hell are going at it in Doom and you wait around to finish the winner off with your shotgun?

    16. Re:Good? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Replace Gods with Furries, there fixed it for you.

    17. Re:Good? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      They've been Scientology hell haven't they?

    18. Re:Good? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      But admittedly somewhat less capable of doing anything about those.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    19. Re:Good? by the_hellspawn · · Score: 1

      we're not your personal army newf*g. Sorry couldn't resist LOL1

      --
      "The laws of science be a harsh mistress." --Bender
    20. Re:Good? by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      4chan strikes me a bit more like the classic greek gods, capricious, capable of granting blessings and curses on a whim.

      Not to mention perverted.

    21. Re:Good? by trapnest · · Score: 2, Informative

      All they said was: Anonymous 10/22/10(Fri)17:03:50 No.11657799 Slashdot: irrelevant since the early 2000's

    22. Re:Good? by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      4chan is fundamentally Chaotic. Being consistently evil is far too... consistent for them.
      So from time to time they pull out a stunt like making an awesome birthsday party for a WWII veteran.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    23. Re:Good? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Chanology is more /i/ than /b/.

    24. Re:Good? by gman003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      4chan is Chaotic Neutral. They're not in it for good OR evil, they're just in it "for teh lulz".

  3. Oh my, what dramatic neverbefore seen turn of even by jack2000 · · Score: 1

    Talking with your userbase boosts sales. News at eleven.

  4. I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by feepness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Those with high sales would see them reduce, and relative unknowns would see them increase.

    Thus the resistance at the high end, and embracing at the lower end.

    1. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by feepness · · Score: 1

      Do you have any actual evidence that high sales have reduced because of "piracy"? Such a thing always seems assumed and never clearly documented (as this story documents the increase in sales following "piracy").

      Nope. I'm just theorizing in a random comment on a message board.

      It is, unfortunately, difficult to prove in an existing high sales environment.

      I "dig" the "quotes" on ""piracy"", though.

    2. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you assuming this or do you have data to back this up?

      "Piracy" (by which I mean copyright infringement) has many variables associated with the rate and amount of infringement activity. Some of these are ease of copying, price of legal content, restrictions on legal content and more.

      Furthermore, it seems no one has ever produced any hard evidence that shows exactly what connections, if there are any, exist between piracy and sales "losses." Lost sales are a negative and it is pretty difficult to prove a negative. One would have to have access to alternate time lines to know for sure. Thus any estimated losses due to piracy is always a completely wild guess.

    3. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Joe Konrath did some experimenting earlier this year, and found evidence of correlation...if I remember right, he put all of his books on his site for free for a day or so and asked people to put them out on torrent sites, share with friends, etc. According to his analysis, his sales increased markedly shortly thereafter. Not proof, but pretty hard to ignore that there was probably some strong correlation there.

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    4. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      In this case I think it's also about people feeling a desire to reward the creator for being cool.

      People are always not what economists would call "rational actors". Either that or we need to establish a price for a positive feeling.

    5. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      At the risk of sounding pessimistic, I suspect this spike came because of the novelty of the situation. Should all comics try this, I suspect the effects would be analogous to webcomics. The very best and/or the best marketed comics will gain hits while the others will be mostly lost in the noise and the free publicity won't do much for them.

    6. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by DanTheStone · · Score: 1

      For clarification: The scare quotes were because it was the term you used, but not one that I consider accurate. I was just wondering what you based your theory on, and whether there have been any (non-experimental) links seen like the one in this article. I know that piracy can sometimes increase valuable exposure for obscure artists (like this story), but I haven't seen evidence or anecdotal evidence of piracy decreasing sales in any measurable way.

    7. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by nateand · · Score: 1

      The author here did the same. All books are available for download on his site for free as PDFs. http://www.undergroundthecomic.com/2010/10/whole-book-for-free-or-learning-something-from-4chan/

    8. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Thing is, purchasing a book both adds extra value over the digital download (in my opinion anyway) and books (especially paperbacks) have a pretty damn good ratio of $ / hours of enjoyment. I'm not entirely sure if the same applies to DVD movies and CD music.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    9. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by feepness · · Score: 1

      As I had to look up Joe Konrath (in order to verify it wasn't my typical ignorance). I'm not a big fiction reader. I'll go with the "relative unknown increases circulation" portion of my speculation.

      For someone/thing that is already well known, it doesn't seem that word of mouth push would help.

    10. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by feepness · · Score: 1

      Are you assuming this or do you have data to back this up?

      You see where it says 'I think'?

      Yeah, that would make it my opinion.

    11. Re:I think exposure to piracy normalizes sales. by martas · · Score: 1

      I don't have evidence, but I do have an intuitive argument: the distribution of people in many views (i.e. feature spaces) has a heavy tail. Thus, with no extra cost (i.e. difficulty of discovery) for accessing rare material (assuming distribution of supply is more or less == to distribution of demand), the tail will become heavier than if there is such extra cost, in which case many people are "pushed" towards the m[ean|edian|ode].

  5. Fighting 4chan? by Gizzmonic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Fighting 4Chan is a bad idea. But exploiting them for money? That's new! Will this trend extend to other vendors such as Doritos or Mr. Pibb? Maybe that infamous "Dollar Menu? I'd hit it!" ad that seems to advocation burgersex was actually aimed at 4Chan.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    1. Re:Fighting 4chan? by skuzzlebutt · · Score: 1

      Relevant self-pimping:

      I published a book last summer about a 4chan-ish group called Amity (name of the book and name of the site where they congregate). In the book, a major soft drink corp tries to do just that: take advantage of the scale of the site users by pushing ads on them, thinking them an innocuous group of consumers. As one could imagine, it doesn't go so well for the soft drink company...

      --
      My debut novel AMITY now available: http://jeremydbrooks.c
    2. Re:Fighting 4chan? by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think this was exploiting them. This was realizing that there was interest and making the most of it. Personally I'm much more likely to buy something from somebody that recognizes a desire for the product and engages in a mature manner rather than letting lawsuits fly because of poor marketing decisions.

  6. Physics by zooblethorpe · · Score: 1

    Thus the resistance at the high end, and embracing at the lower end.

    Almost sounds like electronics.

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  7. Dear Steve Ballmer : Here's How to Increase by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows sales: post to piratebay

    Thanks in advance, although, a cashier's check in the amount of Euro 100,000,000 would help.

    Yours In Krasnoyarsk,
    Kilgore Trout

  8. Re:I wonder... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Funny

    It's the adjectival form of datum, duh.

    --
    Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
    altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
  9. This is why piracy is good by metrix007 · · Score: 1

    and not at all stealing.

    --
    If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    1. Re:This is why piracy is good by strugglz · · Score: 1

      If you want people to break that conception, don't call it piracy. Neuter the term like we have with so many other things. Call it "free information exchange" or something.

  10. piracy is better than obscurity by Chalex · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As Cory Doctorow says "my biggest threat as an author isn't piracy, it's obscurity."

    What better way to increase sales than making sure that everyone has heard of your work?

    1. Re:piracy is better than obscurity by greyline · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who?

    2. Re:piracy is better than obscurity by zill · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Funny how I memorized which xkcd strip that he is referenced in, yet I still have no idea who he is.

    3. Re:piracy is better than obscurity by AfroTrance · · Score: 1

      Her?

    4. Re:piracy is better than obscurity by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      Cory Doctorow was a child actor in the 80s. I think he was in The Goonies or something. I forgot which Cory he was.

      Anyway, if anyone should know about obscurity, it's him. Most people aren't even sure if he's alive or if he OD'ed on heroin a few years back.

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
  11. Let me guess... by Foolomon · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the comic was not about Gene Simmons?

  12. the other trend by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is people like gene simmons and lars ulrich trying to convince executives that the real reason their sales suck is because of piracy. I guess this pretty much destroys that line of thinking.

    1. Re:the other trend by JxcelDolghmQ · · Score: 1, Informative

      Somebody needs to douse Gene and Lars with gasoline and set them on fire.

    2. Re:the other trend by Dan667 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what are you talking about? "In Rainbows" would have never gotten that kind of marketing any other way and it is still selling. And everyone knows bands make most of their money from their concerts so in cutting out their record company, EMI, they kept a much larger percentage of the earnings than they would have gotten from a traditional release. It was a huge success for them.

    3. Re:the other trend by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Delusion is an extremely powerful affliction. And no matter how many "facts" and studies you throw at it, it isn't quite enough to allow reality in.

    4. Re:the other trend by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      I dunno. This is kind of funny since both of these guys have bandmates that have already been set on fire.

      "Fire Baaad... Fire Baaad..."

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    5. Re:the other trend by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Piracy is certainly responsible for any money that Metallica ever made off of me.

      That's why I was so p*ssed when all of the Napster stuff went down.

      When they started they were exactly the sort of band that needed guerilla marketing because the labels and mainstream radio ignored them.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    6. Re:the other trend by jack2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe some one could put up a site where people donate money and once a specific number is reached they hire a mafia hitman.

    7. Re:the other trend by icebraining · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you kidding? Do you know how much "pirated" tapes took for them to reach any kind success?

      "Piracy", as they call it, existed before the 'net. "Home Taping is Killing Music", indeed.

    8. Re:the other trend by brit74 · · Score: 1

      "what are you talking about? "In Rainbows" would have never gotten that kind of marketing any other way and it is still selling. "

      Radiohead's manager said they won't be repeating that stunt, so it couldn't have been that great. And, it really does seem to be a stunt. It generated lots of free advertising for them, but that's not an effect that every band can do with every album because that would make it the norm - meaning the free advertising disappears.

      "And everyone knows bands make most of their money from their concerts so in cutting out their record company, EMI, they kept a much larger percentage of the earnings than they would have gotten from a traditional release. It was a huge success for them."

      You mean it can be more profitable for a band to give away their music and ask for donations than going through a record company where they get a small fraction of the sales profits? Okay, but that's a very particular set of circumstances -- and it revolves heavily around the fact that the record company only gives them a small fraction.

      Let me give you an example to illustrate this further: let's say you work for a lawn company. They charge customers $40 an hour for your work. You earn $4 an hour, and they pocket the rest. One day, you get fed up, so you decide you're going outside the "lawn company" structure. You start working for free and asking people to donate. You start earning $8 an hour. Now, here's the problem: you can't generalize this as "it's better to work for donations than asking people to pay a set amount". Once you include the lawn company's (record company's) cut, you'd realize that the company structure is a whole lot better at getting money from customers than donations are. It's just that the donation system is a lot better deal than the deal your lawn company (record company) is giving you. In other segments of the market (like iPhone apps) software developers are getting 70% of each sale, and that the percentage of each sale can make a big difference in determining the best way to go about selling stuff.

  13. What Monty Python Did by HannethCom · · Score: 4, Informative

    This kind of reminds me of what Monty Python creating their own YouTube channel and their sales going up 23,000%. http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/kit-eaton/technomix/monty-python-youtube-move-boosts-dvd-sales-23000

    --
    Microsoft, Apple, Google, Amazon what's the difference? All steal money from devs and control with walled gardens.
    1. Re:What Monty Python Did by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Citation please. Who was this guy, what was this great game he produced, and where's a picture of him homeless on the street?

  14. Re:Good? Definitely not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    From the graph that got posted, it looks like they DDoSed his bank account.

  15. Just curious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... how many of the sales were completed using credit card numbers that turned out to be stolen? (grin)

  16. "Theft increases sales" by imthesponge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The summary tries to spin this story as "theft increases sales". In reality the theft just prompted the author to do the smart thing and talk to potential customers.

    1. Re:"Theft increases sales" by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      The summary tries to spin this story as "theft increases sales". In reality the theft just prompted the author to do the smart thing and talk to potential customers.

      That's funny, because the summary says the soaring sales came after the author engaged with readers (and not right after the comic was posted). In other words, what the summary says is pretty much exactly what you say is true "in reality" and the opposite of what you say it says. Why you're trying to insert into the summary things it doesn't say (indeed, a contradiction to what it actually says) I'm not sure.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    2. Re:"Theft increases sales" by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Theft? Speaking of spin....

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:"Theft increases sales" by imthesponge · · Score: 1

      It may not be explicit, but it is the underlying message. Why else post it on Slashdot?

    4. Re:"Theft increases sales" by DIplomatic · · Score: 1

      The summary tries to spin this story as "theft increases sales". In reality the theft just prompted the author to do the smart thing and talk to potential customers.

      The word "theft" in your post really gets in the way of the point you're making. Also, the real takeaway here is that it made a huge difference when an artist acknowledged his fans for enjoying his art.

    5. Re:"Theft increases sales" by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      You can begin by not making such outrageous claims.

    6. Re:"Theft increases sales" by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may not be explicit, but it is the underlying message. Why else post it on Slashdot?

      Because slashdot is not a monolithic belief system.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    7. Re:"Theft increases sales" by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Because someone using an infringement of their work for promotion is far wiser than using it for a lawsuit. It is also far rarer.

    8. Re:"Theft increases sales" by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The most amusing part of it all is how up-in-arms people get over GPL "theft." The double-standard never occurs to them.

      It's funny you accuse the slashdot hive mind of hypocrisy when hypocrisy is the precise reason people here get peeved about GPL violations. The violators universally hide behind copyright for other parts of their business. Show me one story on slashdot about a GPL violation by a company or even just some sort of group that doesn't rely on copyright protection for any of their products and I'll eat my words.

      Remember, the entire point of the GPL is to use the system to subvert the system. If there was no system in the first place, there would be no need for the GPL. If I felt like it, I could probably dig up a quote by RMS to that effect.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:"Theft increases sales" by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Remember, the entire point of the GPL is to use the system to subvert the system.

      That's complete bullshit.

      The entire point of the GPL is to focus revenue as services rather than sales of complex, copyrighted, IP. Yet that factual part is what always seems to get lost in discussions. From its inception, the intention is to allow developers to generate revenue from customizations, installation, maintenance, documentation, so on and so on, allowing developers of all sizes to participate in the market while preventing large corporations from strangling the market with monopolies on complex software.

      Crackpots have come along and prevent its some socialist agenda where no one should be paid. The simple fact is, anyone who makes such a suggestion has completely missed the entire point of the GPL and has completely ignored its rather well documented history.

    10. Re:"Theft increases sales" by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The entire point of the GPL is to focus revenue as services rather than sales of complex, copyrighted, IP

      You are confusing an effect with a goal. RMS has said many times that his goal in creating the GPL and other forms of copyleft (a name that itself inherently demonstrates the intent to subvert the system of copyright) is to spread freedom and cooperation while the dominant use of copyright law is to take away freedom.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    11. Re:"Theft increases sales" by lucifron · · Score: 1

      You never hear stories about piracy hurting anything.

      Sure you do.. I've seen several threads in the last couple of weeks about open source being marginalized by unlicensed MS software. ;)

      PC gaming is far from dead, the revenue was $13 billion in 2009, up from $11 bn in 2008. Has it ever been healthier, despite an ever-increasing range of activities (and consoles) competing for our time?

      Go read the wikipedia pages on software-as-a-service, and I doubt you'll see piracy even mentioned. It's all about cutting costs through reduced overheads and specialization.
      While businesses can afford to pay for their software, 13-year old kids might not, but they still wouldn't be able to if the pirate bay wasn't an option. I simply don't buy the argument that copyright infringement equates to lost sales.

      The way IP holders and their lobbyists are pushing us towards a totalitarian society, in an effort to keep their antiquated business model, is such a threat to our free society that I'm in favor of major revision/relaxation of our IP laws. Their stated purpose is to provide an incentive for creating art and driving research, but people would, and do, these things regardless of profit.

  17. Example by imthesponge · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apple is a good example of this phenomenon.

    1. Re:Example by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2, Insightful

      At least the higher prices part. Not so much the delivery issues part. I remember I sent a laptop in for repairs on a Saturday over a 4th of July weekend once, and got it back on Monday, fully repaired and with a new hard drive that had twice the capacity. That's the sort of reason they have fans.

    2. Re:Example by RedDeadThumb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well if your looking at anecdotal evidence, I ordered and Ipad from the apple store (as a gift) and it didn't even ship until 4 days after it was supposed to be delivered. This is with a promise of "ships in 24 hours". Apple customer service ran me around for an hour claiming I hadn't even made an order until suddenly they found it in "some other system". They then promised it would still deliver on time. I don't see why they just couldn't have been honest and told me they were backordered instead of wasting an hour of my time mostly listening to crappy on-hold musak!

    3. Re:Example by Anubis+IV · · Score: 2, Funny

      I like my story better.

    4. Re:Example by I_Human · · Score: 1

      In my anecdotal experience yours is the more common story as well.

      --
      -JP
    5. Re:Example by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Was" a good example. "Had" fans. This new OS X app store complete with Apple's famous control-freakishness changes all that. People will be screaming.

      It wouldn't be so bad, except Apple chose to lock out functionality for non-app-store apps. That's a BAD practice and Apple should know better. They have been warned, many times.

      You just don't take a general-purpose desktop or high-end laptop computer, and lock out functionality. Microsoft suffered from that syndrome. It it hadn't, Linux would not be the increasingly-popular OS that it is.

      If Apple continues down that road, they will lose the following they worked so hard to gain. That would be sad.

  18. Good people skills by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Treating your customers with respect is the best way to see them respect you right back, often with money and sales. RIAA needs to seriously take notice of this.

    1. Re:Good people skills by hedwards · · Score: 2, Funny

      If the RIAA respected their customers, do you really think that crap like Hanson and Bieber would ever be released?

    2. Re:Good people skills by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      Precisely. It's another nail in their coffin, really.

  19. Here are the files by stephanruby · · Score: 1

    Apparently, he even posted the scans on his web site. On that note, can anyone recommend me a good comic viewer that will browse/open this type of .cbt files on Windows, or even better a comic viewer that could browse/open this type of .cbt files on my Evo (Android phone). There are so many manga/comic viewers out there, I'd rather not waste my time trying a different bunch of them.

    1. Re:Here are the files by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Informative

      ComicRack is simply the best.

      No, really, it is. But Comix is passable if you want a leaner program.

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:Here are the files by AtomicOrange · · Score: 1

      You rock, I've had those files sitting on my NAS for years. Hadn't taken the time to find a good viewer. Thanks!

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
    3. Re:Here are the files by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      I use Comical. I works pretty good for me. Granted, I haven't tried out a bunch of different comic readers either.

      http://comical.sourceforge.net/

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  20. Correlation and causation. by sseaman · · Score: 1

    Also, people give out free samples all the time to create a "buzz" about a product that will likely fly under the radar. I don't see anything new here.

    Most pirated material is stuff people already know about and want. Do you think if Adobe started giving away Photoshop people would suddenly desire it more than they already do?

    1. Re:Correlation and causation. by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Supply and demand. There is only one Photoshop and if I need it, I need it. You can extort what you want and sic me if I don't pay. There are thousands upon thousands of alternatives to Metallica and I don't need Metallica to do my day to day work.

    2. Re:Correlation and causation. by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Very rational of you to compare a $3-$20 comic with a program that costs at least 10x as much.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  21. New graph in 3...2...1... by Orgasmatron · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I can't wait to see his sales graph after he adds the /. effect. How do we stack up to 4chan in terms of economic power?

    I'm ordering the TPB. I got back into comics about a year ago after dropping out for a decade. Wish I'd noticed this when it came out.

    --
    See that "Preview" button?
    1. Re:New graph in 3...2...1... by gknoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More importantly, how many of us would be ordering mainly because we want to read the book versus we want to reward the author for being a non-jerk, and hey this book looks neat too? I'd fall in the latter, if I were to read it.

      On the other hand, that's exactly the reason I deliberately look for Baen-published books at the bookstore when I'm looking for something new. Read about their awesome policies, read Honor Harrington online, bought some (not enough!) novels in print later.

    2. Re:New graph in 3...2...1... by Spykk · · Score: 1

      I'm ordering the TPB.

      No no no. You don't have to order from the pirate bay, just click the button.

    3. Re:New graph in 3...2...1... by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, that's exactly the reason I deliberately look for Baen-published books at the bookstore when I'm looking for something new. Read about their awesome policies, read Honor Harrington online, bought some (not enough!) novels in print later.

      Definitely. Baen's policies and general attitude to publishing are really refreshing. And this workstation is called harrington.peter-b.co.uk, BTW.

  22. So that's what happens... by RealGrouchy · · Score: 4, Funny

    So that's what happens when you feed the trolls...

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    1. Re:So that's what happens... by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      They have more disposable income to spend on other things?

  23. Context by njfuzzy · · Score: 1

    Sure, this vastly increased sales-- the artist's direct sales of the trade paperback on his own Etsy. We have no sense at all of the scale of impact on overall sales. In effect, this was just the best opportunity he had had to drive traffic to his own site. Would this have even shown up as a blip in total overall sales? Did Amazon see a similar peak?

    --
    My Photography - http://ian-x.com
    The Deathlings (comic) - http://thedeathlings.com
  24. Re:Wow, the Slashdot piracy party is at it again by Oligonicella · · Score: 1

    Shhhhh. Logic.

  25. Cryptomnesia by tepples · · Score: 4, Informative

    Ah, but as shares concentrate into the hands of the few and powerful,but sales dwindle

    Then the music publishers affiliated with the major record labels will likely start making accusations of cryptomnesia, or accidental infringement of copyright in a work published years ago, against indie songwriters and recording artists. See Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music for an example of how it could go down.

    1. Re:Cryptomnesia by digitig · · Score: 1

      Then the music publishers affiliated with the major record labels will likely start making accusations of cryptomnesia, or accidental infringement of copyright in a work published years ago, against indie songwriters and recording artists. See Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music for an example of how it could go down.

      Remind me, which was the indie band/songwriter in that dispute?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    2. Re:Cryptomnesia by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      Even better was when John Fogerty was sued by his former label for plagiarizing himself.

      http://cip.law.ucla.edu/cases/case_fantfogerty.html

  26. Re:In B4 ad storm... by hesiod · · Score: 1

    It was on /co/nsumerism.

  27. cbt = tarball of JPEGs by tepples · · Score: 1

    On that note, can anyone recommend me a good comic viewer that will browse/open this type of .cbt files on Windows

    You could open cbt/cbr/cbz files in 7-Zip. They're just archives in commonly used formats, with different extensions to indicate that the archive contains paged media such as photos or comics.

  28. Furry comics too? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You do know 4chan has a big comics board right? People on it are pretty heavily into comics.

    Unless, of course, the characters are uplifted animals. Then you get the anti-furry memes going.

  29. Somebody should mention by Kevin108 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The B&W chapter 1 preview PDF on the author's site is NSFW.

    --

    It's a perfect time for being wasted.
    A perfect time to watch the stars.
    - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
    1. Re:Somebody should mention by Wintywasthere · · Score: 1

      Nice one - if you can find any more stuff that's NSFW in there, please yell..:P

    2. Re:Somebody should mention by Ezel · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. What's NSFW? There is 4 frames when a clearly over 18 year old girl gets out of bed and one sees her panties.
      Is that it?

      --
      Prosp long and liver.
    3. Re:Somebody should mention by Kevin108 · · Score: 1

      I admit I clicked very rapidly but I was pretty sure I saw the shadow of a nipple.

      --

      It's a perfect time for being wasted.
      A perfect time to watch the stars.
      - Burden Brothers, "Beautiful Night"
  30. Goat S(acrific)e by tepples · · Score: 3, Funny

    will 4chan bless me with more rain if i sacrifice my goat?

    Start with "goat sacrifice", and then sacrifice the letters in the middle of the second word.

    [the game]

  31. Re:Wow, the Slashdot piracy party is at it again by hesiod · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, because they got to see the artwork and read the story, and then engage with the author immediately afterward, as a surprise. If he just showed up out of the blue, a bunch of jerks would be all "who the hell are you, and why should we care", etc. Others would think he was an imposter, and a ton more would assume it's a crappy marketing ploy.

  32. A little perspective by PCM2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Steve Lieber is a nice guy and a talented artist, and his comics are worth reading, but let's put this scenario into a little perspective. This is not a case of Steve posting to 4chan and then all the little 4channers running out to buy his comics.

    Point 1: Underground could already be downloaded for free from Lieber's Web site, so it being "pirated" on 4chan wasn't that big of a coup.

    Point 2: Comic book companies do not track sales on a daily basis. The sales that went "through the roof" were sales of signed print editions from Lieber's Etsy store.

    So rather than a massive vindication of 4chan, "engaging your audience," or anything else, I see this more as a case of: A.) creator makes a product available online; B.) author manages (if inadvertently) to find an effective marketing channel for said product; C.) people who spend most of their time online notice the marketing and buy the product.

    Pretty simple, really. Engaging his audience helped, but he would have been happy to engage anybody that came his way to begin with. The problem is, "build it and they will come" doesn't really work on the Web. Lieber lucked out that someone else noticed him and chose to promote his product in a way that he couldn't on his own. He was smart enough to pounce on the opportunity.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:A little perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Re Point 1: the comic was MADE available for free at Steve's site in response to the 4chan thread, not before it, that's the point.

    2. Re:A little perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Point 1: Underground could already be downloaded for free from Lieber's Web site, so it being "pirated" on 4chan wasn't that big of a coup.

      Not quite. He originally released chapter 1 for free, not the entire book.

      Somebody from the 4chan /co/ board then bought the full book, scanned it, and put up a thread with these scanned images. Steve Lieber took notice, joined the thread, and has now put up the book for free on his website. He also added a donate button in case you only want the digital version and want to kick a few bucks his way.

      Point 2: Comic book companies do not track sales on a daily basis. The sales that went "through the roof" were sales of signed print editions from Lieber's Etsy store.

      The online store is most likely not on the scale of national comic book stores, but who knows? Maybe a large number of his sales are made online. Regardless, it makes the sudden increase no less impressive.

      So rather than a massive vindication of 4chan, "engaging your audience," or anything else, I see this more as a case of: A.) creator makes a product available online; B.) author manages (if inadvertently) to find an effective marketing channel for said product; C.) people who spend most of their time online notice the marketing and buy the product.

      Pretty simple, really. Engaging his audience helped, but he would have been happy to engage anybody that came his way to begin with. The problem is, "build it and they will come" doesn't really work on the Web. Lieber lucked out that someone else noticed him and chose to promote his product in a way that he couldn't on his own. He was smart enough to pounce on the opportunity.

      To be honest, I don't see your point here. You're arguing that the author was not "engaging his audience", merely finding an effective marketing channel for his product. But, the "marketing strategy" he discovered was engaging his audience; jumping into the fray so to speak, and directly communicating with the people copying (and most likely reading!) his book. He must have linked his website during the discussion, but I don't know if I would call that marketing, or even much of an advertisement, really. They already had his product, after all, just digitally instead of physically.

    3. Re:A little perspective by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      You really think poorly of people in general don't you?

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  33. NOW you've gone too far! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    K.T., I find your advocacy of the distribution of dangerous viruses to unsuspecting cybercitizens to be reprehensible.

  34. Not entirely true... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    If this were a new thing you might have a point. However, in Japan they have their own equivalent of comic-con and people make their own fan-zines and sell them for a profit. It's technically illegal but they never get shut down. The reason is that excitement over a franchise is still excitement over a franchise. This was known over 10 years ago but nobody over here is paying attention to it.

    That is not... entirely true. I recall Disney was not amused when someone published a doujin with Micky and Minnie Mouse 'going at it.' (Right, 50 years of celibacy?) And don't you know it, Disney's landsharks came knocking so fast it made their heads spin.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  35. missing the big picture by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think we're missing the point. 4chan (likley /co/) purchased, reviewed, and raved about a non-cp, gore or furry comic. That's quite impressive! In all honesty, I am doubting the validity of this because as we all know, such a cause and effect with the given circumstances is not possible around the chan. It requires filth, so much so that not even a mountain of dial-soap could be of any help. That's why I am dismissing this article by calling it fluff in attempt to get more sales.

  36. Re:Well I'll be by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It wasn't the free sharing of this book that boosted its sales. What boosted sales was that the artist got tipped off about it, and had a chance to introduce himself and interact with the pirates, and put a face on "the copyright holder" for them. He was no longer some non-person they could continue to not give a fuck about; he was a human being (and a pretty cool one) whose creativity should be rewarded. It's easy to rip off some anonymous corporation like "Disney" or "Sony" or even "Image Comics", but not so easy to rip off "Steve Lieber" and his co-creator "Jeff Parker". Lieber met them where they lived, and gently poked a hole in their disregard for him as a creator by being a real person. It's a good lesson for other creators... but it'd be nice if more consumers were willing to meet the creators on their own home field as well. If you like a person's work, don't just "share" it with 100,000 of your closest friends: bring them to the creator's web site or Facebook page or whatever, so he has a chance to interact with them like a human being. An artist shouldn't have to engage in detective work to ferret out the people who like his work; if they really like it, they should act like real fans (rather than leeches) and reach out to him.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  37. goodie by Badbone · · Score: 1

    While that is great for the artist and the chans, it's missing the point. It's a bit like someone breaking into your house, and while you are away to buy new locks, a fire breaks out. "See!", the burglar says, "good thing I broke in, huh?" You do not have permission to steal/post/copy/upload other people's works without their permission. Yes, even if it all works out in the end.

    --
    It can be go tiem now plees?
    1. Re:goodie by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, you’re missing the point. With a physical object, like a house, someone else moving in uninvited would detract from your ability to use the house. With information, it doesn’t, unless you’re a snob... somebody else having a copy of your painting doesn’t interfere with your ability to enjoy it, unless your enjoyment of it was partly based on the fact that nobody else had it in the first place.

      It’s more like they copied the blueprint for your house and used it to design virtual houses in SecondLife, which became so popular that people who would otherwise never have known about you came and wanted to buy copies of your blueprint to build real houses.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:goodie by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Nope, this is a snob case. You can’t have my passport information because my ability to use it depends entirely on the fact that nobody else has it. However, this is because civilization has come to the conclusion that a person can be identified by the information they possess, which is moronic but I have to live within that framework.

      The difference is, my passwords, bank account numbers, PIN numbers, passport info, etc. are secret. You can’t have them for any price. If I was trying to sell information, though, I’d have a problem: I’m simultaneously trying to give information away, and prevent the people I give it to from giving it to others as well. This simply does not work.

      You can either keep information secret, or you can give it away. Trying to do both simultaneously doesn’t work.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  38. Re:Wow, the Slashdot piracy party is at it again by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > Don't you think his sales would be better had they *not* copied his comic *and* he made an appearance on their forums?

    Except "Mohammed" here didn't quite do that now did he? He needed to be dragged into it by circumstance.

    Art mongers need to get over their megalomania.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  39. inb4 by koolfy · · Score: 1

    inb4 : RIAA/MPAA trolling 4chan...
    Tits or GTFO.

    --
    Segmentation Fault in "Life, Universe and Everything" at line 42. Don't Panic.
  40. Publisher get no % of royalties, or rights by klui · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this post by Steve clinched it for the lurkers. http://undergroundthecomic.com/4chan_thread_20614483.html#20642617

  41. Re:I wonder... by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

    Indeed. This seems like a one time thing. People are jumping up and down to prove a point. It's like when fans of Jericho sent in their nuts or fans of Chuck went to Subway, or even the election of a recent president. Everyone was enthusiastic at first and did what they had to in order to prove their point, but then, as time went on and either apathy or exhaustion set in, everything reverted back to business (or politics) as usual.

    --
    But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
  42. Re:Good? Depends which letter. by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    There's a big difference between 4chan and /b/. I got hooked on /b/ for a while, and i think it did real damage. I'm sorta recovered. But only partially because I still post on /. so I have a ways to go.

  43. Harlan Ellison? by denzacar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is that you?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Harlan Ellison? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Is that you?

      Get off of my damned lawn, or I'll sic my Boy and His Dog on you!

  44. MARKETEERS TAKE NOTE by Kazoo+the+Clown · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This shows that sometimes you will do better when you're actually nice to potential customers, and don't try to ram things down their throats or P. T. Barnum them.

  45. Bah by Arancaytar · · Score: 4, Funny

    These sales CANNOT compare to the BILLIONS UPON BILLIONS of dollars he would have earned had these evil pirates not stolen his property.

    (signed, the RIAA)

    1. Re:Bah by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Is that billions of Monopoly game dollars, or is it billions of real dollars from the 2 people who buy it (after hyperinflation depreciates the dollar to 10^(-8) of its current worth ?

    2. Re:Bah by proudhawk · · Score: 1

      Billions? I think you exaggerate a bit, don't you?

      As someone else pointed out in here, some comics just are worth holding in hand because they don't look as good on a monitor.

      now if I could just get a broilled edition, then I'd be all set. :)

      --
      Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
    3. Re:Bah by proudhawk · · Score: 1

      GAH! thats brailled. damned fingers!

      --
      Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
    4. Re:Bah by proudhawk · · Score: 1

      please prove the logic and math underlying your claim. real numbers only please.

      --
      Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
    5. Re:Bah by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      To be fair, a broiled edition sounds delicious.

    6. Re:Bah by proudhawk · · Score: 1

      hehehe yeah a slight mistype caused a "funny" comment to appear.

      that is the problem with being blind, sometimes you miss the right key (still, its a long way across the kb from A to O).

      --
      Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  46. It produced case law by tepples · · Score: 1

    Then the music publishers affiliated with the major record labels will likely start making accusations of cryptomnesia, or accidental infringement of copyright in a work published years ago, against indie songwriters and recording artists. See Bright Tunes Music v. Harrisongs Music for an example of how it could go down.

    Remind me, which was the indie band/songwriter in that dispute?

    I know what you're getting at: Bright Tunes wasn't the clear-cut Big Four vs. indie case that I fear is likely to happen. But even though Bright Tunes was between two established companies, it produced case law that a major music publisher can use against an up and coming indie band.

  47. Oh ohhh I got it! by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    1. Draw crappy comics 2. Post it on 4chan 3. ??? 4. Profit!

  48. The tone of this story seems a bit odd to me... by BaronHethorSamedi · · Score: 1

    ...for a community whose lockstep mantra much of the time is "correlation is not causation."

    I'm not trying to troll, but all we can really say is that there was a spike in sales (and the original article doesn't make clear just how much of a spike--I can't get to the author's blog from work) following a conversation on 4chan. Those two pieces of information, by themselves, don't seem to me to mean all that much. I would love to believe (as many here seem to) that they translate directly into "if you respond to pirates on internet forums they will all rush out and buy your stuff," but I think we need a lot more information before it's reasonable to draw that conclusion.

  49. If anyone is listening... by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If anyone in the industry is listening, hear this.

    The last three video games I purchased were purchased after first torrenting them.

    Nothing, and I mean nothing, will give me more incentive to buy something then a test drive--a test drive that ends with positive results.

    You have nothing to fear if you create a worthy product.

    And, in terms of reviews of a product, nothing speaks like seed/leech numbers...at least until someone starts gaming THAT as well.

    Steve just reminds us that we all have a choice--you can keep paddling into that wave, or you can hop on your board and go for a ride. Either way, that wave is headed for the beach and it just might be the best one of the day.

  50. Sage lesson by RenHoek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    People underestimate the power of not being a dick.

  51. Steve Lieber has an explanation by brit74 · · Score: 1

    Seems Steve Lieber has an explanation for why his sales increased (and it's not generalizable to other media - e.g. music, software, movies - which is "native" to digital format):

    "The problem is this: I hate looking at the kind of comics I do on a screen. I read plenty of funny comics on the web, but adventure stories just don't work for me online. Heavy brush and ink line art art seems ill-suited for monitors, and the storytelling rhythm is sort of *off*, somehow. I think it's an inferior experience for the reader. Or at least it is for me, but when I'm creating a comic, I'm have to go by my own tastes."

    This is why I also think books have done better with piracy than other media - people don't like reading books on their computer screen. Hence, people like Doctorow, who want to sing the praises of piracy, are ignorant of why their media is different from other people's media. I'd find it funny how clueless they are about their own situation if they weren't out there trolling people who make other media.

  52. Seems Steve Lieber has an explanation by brit74 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems Steve Lieber has an explanation for why his sales increased (and it's not generalizable to other media - e.g. music, software, movies - which is "native" to digital format):

    "The problem is this: I hate looking at the kind of comics I do on a screen. I read plenty of funny comics on the web, but adventure stories just don't work for me online. Heavy brush and ink line art art seems ill-suited for monitors, and the storytelling rhythm is sort of *off*, somehow. I think it's an inferior experience for the reader. Or at least it is for me, but when I'm creating a comic, I'm have to go by my own tastes."

    This is why I also think books have done better with piracy than other media - people don't like reading books on their computer screen. Hence, people like Doctorow, who want to sing the praises of piracy, are ignorant of why their media is different from other people's media. I'd find it funny how clueless they are about their own situation if they weren't out there trolling people who make other media.

  53. pirates are a comics best friend? by proudhawk · · Score: 1

    the author of that comic did something outside the box and it profited him greatly. now if the music and movie industries would realize the same market and offer their wares for a lot less, they would sell more, alienate a lot less and still profit.

    --
    Understanding is much like a 3-edged-sword. in this: there are always 2 sides and the truth.
  54. Consider piracy to be "free advertising". by mykos · · Score: 1

    Pirates may not buy, but they WILL talk. Everyone has an advertising budget...consider piracy to be part of that budget. There's no way to tell if they would have bought it anyway.

  55. Re:Well I'll be by mjwx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It wasn't the free sharing of this book that boosted its sales.

    True

    What boosted sales was that the artist got tipped off about it, and had a chance to introduce himself and interact with the pirates, and put a face on "the copyright holder" for them.

    Not so,

    What the artist did is called "good marketing".

    If the artist had of run in and shouted "Pirates, ha, I'll sue you, and you and your grandma, I'll dig up her grandma and sue her after I finish having my sweet, sweet way with her corpse" the people would have just said "what a douche, I'll just copy his crap".

    Instead he walked in and said "so... you like my work, lets talk about it". From this people got the impression that he was creating things because he wanted to, not to make a quick buck. It's not about guilting them into it as you've inferred. If it were that easy the RIAA would have a picture of a kitten with a gun to it's head on every street corner to remind everyone of the "real" cost of copyright infringement. His sales increased because people liked him, this is part of the reason Valve is doing so well, people like them.

    This is good marketing.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  56. Re:I wonder... by martas · · Score: 1

    "data" is plural???? *head explodes*

  57. Re:Well I'll be by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    "His sales increased because people liked him,"

    That's what I meant by showing them that he was a real person. Acting like the RIAA (the evil fantasy that pirates hold in their heads to justify the way they treat creators) wouldn't have helped. Call the emotional reaction what you wish; it was a response to him as a person.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  58. Re:Good? Definitely not by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    DDoSed

    That word...I do not think it means what you think it means.