Slashdot Mirror


Curious NASA Pre-Announcement

CrtxReavr was one of a small avalanche of readers to let us know about a press conference NASA scheduled for Thursday at 2pm to discuss an "astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life." I've heard rumors ranging from "proof of life on Titan" to "first contact," depending on how optimistic/crazy you are.

286 comments

  1. Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Methinks you might want to expand your range at the bottom a bit. I suspect it will be something along the lines of "We've discovered evidence that some precursor to life may have been present on this extraterrestrial body--or may not, depending heavily on your interpretation of some very ambiguous data."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by geegel · · Score: 4, Funny

      You just had to ruin it, didn't you?

      --
      right...
    2. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      That's far too wordy.

      NASA could take a tip from Apple's Marketting department.

      Nasa? Seriously? Just get any one of your guys to go any old bar. Leave a moon-rock sample or whatever it is you've found on a table there, someone will find it and post about it on their blog and it'll drive people into hysteria.

      None of this "Scheduling announcements" - just deny absolutely everything about what you might actually want to announce and let the geeks build it up.

    3. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by oodaloop · · Score: 4, Funny

      Way to blow your shot at FR1ST CN0TACT post. Nice going.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    4. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

      It probably has to do with the recent discovery of oxygen on Saturn's moon Rhea.

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    5. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by mibe · · Score: 1, Insightful

      NASA will hold a news conference at 2 p.m. EST on Thursday, Dec. 2, to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life. Astrobiology is the study of the origin, evolution, distribution and future of life in the universe.

      For the "future of life" bit, could be something cool relating to our ability to live in space. After all, our current body of evidence suggests that we're the future of extraterrestrial life (speculation about Thursday notwithstanding).

    6. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by durrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's the classic, "amino acid X found in space", that comet they swooshed by recently would be a good target for announcing "amino acid y found on comet".

      Then again it's too classic, so it definitely have to be MASS RELAY FOUND IN PLUTONIAN ORBIT!

    7. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by RsG · · Score: 1

      Which will, of course, be picked up be the media as "NASA finds extraterrestrials!" instead of the more accurate "NASA finds preliminary evidence of microbial life." And then stupid people will feel betrayed when it's explained to them that, no, this does not mean little grey men with probes.

      Why people continue to fall for sensationalist reporting is beyond me, it's getting really really predictable. Or maybe I'm just getting old.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    8. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      In NASA's defense, they always have some great animation to go along with their press conferences. It's the only deliverable they consistently produce.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by F34nor · · Score: 4, Funny

      I am hoping for a GCU so I can get my god damn drug glands.

    10. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "NASA finds extraterrestrials...Little Grey Men With Probes," Says Slashdot Poster RsG!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    11. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Xserv · · Score: 1

      They are pretty damn amazing, aren't they?

      --
      "I love lamp."
    12. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by durrr · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am hoping for a GCU so I can have sex with a spaceship.

    13. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...no, this does not mean little grey men with probes.

      You mean, the TSA? (Sorry, I just couldn't resist the opportunity!)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    14. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by durrr · · Score: 1, Informative

      It might be news from the O/OREOS satellite launched a few days ago. according to wiki it's supposed to rehydrate/feed a bunch of extremophiles on board a "few days" after launch. Given the time for bacterial growth cycles they could quite likely have news already fromt his one, which would probably either be "bacteria revived in microgravity thrives perfectly well in!" or "bacteria revived in microgravity catch fire and die"

    15. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is that it's more like "We are the extra terrestrials. Pay no attention to wikileaks."

    16. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by UID30 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Meh. CommanderTaco made first contact with Uranus years ago. BAZINGA!

      --
      "Glory is fleeting, but obscurity is forever." - Napoleon Bonaparte
    17. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Our precision for extra-solar discoveries just isn't there yet. It's coming along nicely, but any 'extra-terrestrial' announcements are gonna be within our own solar system.

      Still, the discovery of, or plausible biological solution for an otherwise physically impossible scenario still warrants announcement if it has been properly vetted. Astronomy, or Astro-biology in this case, is still a field that produces new and possibly life-changing news.

      The possibilities are vast, yet the details of conversation here will be fairly specific with the announcement. Funny how that works, in Astronomy.

    18. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It better not be this, seriously.
      If they need to hold a damn conference to announce that, "HOLY SHIT, an element of the periodic table is on ANOTHER planet, holy crap that is mindblowing! SUDDENLY LIFE", i might actually break something.
      This was already posted about, that is enough, we don't need a damn conference to announce oxygen on another planet, it is already on Mars and the Moon, it isn't exactly rare.

      I best not watch this live, or at least have myself restrained for a week after it and ban any website from my computer with NASA in it, i'm quite fond of the things sitting near me, i'd rather not crush it while imagining the entirety of NASA contained in the object.

    19. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      They found an old campsite with crushed Bud cans and used condoms on Titan.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    20. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

      Or it might be a very lame announcement like: "we have discovered a new way to SEARCH for life using blahblahmetry, so we're going to start using this new techniques in our next probes"
      This is very close to: "astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence...."

      Or... is something amazing we're about find out within the recent Wikileak

    21. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

      It probably has to do with the recent discovery of oxygen on saturn's moon Rhea.

      Doubtful, for two reasons: (a) that has already been announced, and (b) the oxygen there has a plausible nonbiological origin (energetic particles in Saturn's magnetic field interacting with water ice on the surface).

      The smart money says this press announcement will be disappointing to most people. Not unlike like the whole Apple/Beatles thing.

    22. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by burisch_research · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lol you think our backwards Earthican gummints would let on if a GCU pitched up? No, SC would have to poll the populace ...

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    23. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Thelasko · · Score: 1

      The smart money says this press announcement will be disappointing to most people.

      Which is why I think it's about oxygen on Rhea.

      It will probably be something like, "You know about the trace amounts of oxygen on Rhea, but we put some streptococcus bacteria in a similar concentration of oxygen, and they survived for 3 days!"

      --
      One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    24. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      It's the CO2 in Rhea that's mysterious.

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    25. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not unlike like the whole Apple/Beatles thing.

      What was so disappointing about that? Not being able to buy singles? Did George Lucas rape your childhood?

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    26. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Caption+Wierd · · Score: 1

      Come on. Are we so jaded now that life-in-space research (even if it is just an amino acid found on a comet) is just ho-hum news? Speaking as one of the generation that sat up all night watching blurry images of men walking on the Moon, we did not expect this. Everything we knew then eliminated the bulk of the solar system as being able to support life. Sure, we did expect to be out to Jupiter by now but that we would already be on the verge of proving that life is not limited to this one planet is incredible. I just want to be around when the first critter comes skittering in front of a rover's camera.

    27. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not unlike like the whole Apple/Beatles thing. What was so disappointing about that?

      If you didn't already have better copies of the Beatles music before it was available in the iTunes store, and wanted a few obscure tracks that weren't available on any of the "hits" collections, then maybe that was an exciting announcement.

      But, based on the sales figures, it looks like converting your own CDs to MP3 for your music player isn't as easy as I thought it was, as millions of people in the US wanted Beatles music but had been waiting 20+ years for somebody to convert the files for them.

    28. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Nocuous · · Score: 1

      It's probably about the thin oxygen atmosphere they found on Rhea.

      Meh. Nothing earth-shattering.

      --
      Don't take it personally, but I'm not going to read your pithy response to my post.
    29. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by alexandre_ganso · · Score: 1

      that comet they swooshed by recently

      Comet feels swooshed

    30. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Nocuous · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ooh! Ooh! If it's a GCU I hope it's Gray Area (aka Meatfucker).

      --
      Don't take it personally, but I'm not going to read your pithy response to my post.
    31. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      It says that the finding will impact "the search for evidence", which makes me think even you are being a bit optimistic. My bet is on "we have developed a technique that could be used to find evidence that some precursor to life may have been present on a given extraterrestrial body -- or may not, depending heavily on your interpretation of the very ambiguous data this technique will provide."

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    32. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bacteria revived in microgravity catch fire, gain superpowers, thrives perfectly well. Also, we have three days to evacuate Chicago before the colour lands."

    33. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Palmsie · · Score: 1

      It probably has to do with the recent discovery of oxygen on Saturn's moon Rhea.

      Why would NASA announce something that has already been announced? Kinda defeats the purpose of an announcement.

      --
      Carl Sagan quotes get you an automatic +5 on all posts.
    34. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by smitty97 · · Score: 1

      O/OREOS, The White Stuff

      --
      mod me funny
    35. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Sulphur · · Score: 3, Funny

      My guess is that it's more like "We are the extra terrestrials. Pay no attention to wikileaks."

      Just wait till Wikileaks dumps extra terrestrials data.

    36. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Except we're not really on the verge of proving any such thing. Every "discovery" along these lines so far has been nothing more than glorified speculation. Life *could*, life *might*, it's *possible* that... Here is some ambiguous evidence--it could mean this, but it could just as easily mean nothing at all.

      Their announcements, and certainly the hype that follows, are usually more speculative fiction these days than actual meaningful scientific discovery.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    37. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Unless it's a meteor, that might be Earth-shattering....

    38. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      I'd also draw back the range at the top. An announcement of first contact - or anything remotely resembling it - would not be left to mere "fellow"s. If that were on the talking-points sheet, even the Administrator of NASA would have a difficult time finagling a spot to stand on the podium, behind the Chief of Staff, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, VPOTUS, and POTUS.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    39. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Are we so jaded now that life-in-space research (even if it is just an amino acid found on a comet) is just ho-hum news?

      Another amino acid found on a comet is just ho-hum news. Life in space... well, that isn’t ho-hum news, but it also hasn’t been found.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    40. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I'd say scratch the press conference and send out a press release of the alleged news. I'm interested, but this attempt to whip up suspense can't be good, the last time they did this, it was a dud. It better be good, and I want it to be big, but somehow, I doubt it.

    41. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Methinks you might want to expand your range at the bottom a bit. I suspect it will be something along the lines of "We've discovered evidence that some precursor to life may have been present on this extraterrestrial body--or may not, depending heavily on your interpretation of some very ambiguous data."

      I for one welcome our ambiguous extra-terrestrial precursor overlords.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    42. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      or "bacteria revived in microgravity, evolves and takes over the spacecraft!"

      --
      This is blinging
    43. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      neither can they

    44. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by pz · · Score: 4, Informative

      It probably has to do with the recent discovery of oxygen on saturn's moon Rhea.

      Doubtful, for two reasons: (a) that has already been announced, and (b) the oxygen there has a plausible nonbiological origin (energetic particles in Saturn's magnetic field interacting with water ice on the surface).

      The smart money says this press announcement will be disappointing to most people. Not unlike like the whole Apple/Beatles thing.

      Extra doubtful that it's about Rhea because Carolyn Porco, the head of the Cassini project, isn't on the list of participants.

      Doing a few minutes' worth of work in Google comes to the following information about the listed participants in the press conference:

      Mary Voytek -- director, NASA Astrobiology program
      Felisa Wolfe-Simon -- evolutionary biology including metallic enzymes, specifically the potential role of arsenic in DNA
      Pamela Conrad -- biogeochemistry and organic chemical signatures of extremophiles
      Steven Benner -- geobiology of RNA, including detection of DNA and RNA
      James Elser -- the influence of nitrogen and phosphorus in biological processes including ecosystems, speciation and RNA

      Since the announcement of the press conference says that the finding will impact the "search for evidence of extraterrestrial life," chances are they've found some potential signature of a metabolic process. Notwithstanding what I said above about Carolyn Porco, Cassini flew within 100 km of Rhea earlier this year (March) to "determine what is coming off Rhea" according to NASA's site on the flyby. The timing (March to December) fits well with the amount of time it takes to do data analysis, write a paper, and have it accepted for publication for something that gets fast-tracked. Science is published on Fridays. Nature is published on Thursdays. It would seem like the paper is going to appear in Nature no matter what the exact announcement is.
       

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    45. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      In fairness to NASA, Apple does schedule their announcements about a week out, like NASA has with this one, and plenty of rumours have been sparked just on the back of that announcement. They just need a "one more thing" moment to make it complete.

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    46. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by The_Other_Kelly · · Score: 1

      For over 10th years I've been using the tagline "agreeing with the Grey Area" ... finally someone else agrees ...

      --
      (R)ule in Hell or (S)erve in Heaven [R]?
    47. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by uglyduckling · · Score: 1

      I think part of that is that the majority of Beatles music on CDs has been mastered shockingly badly. I kept my vinyl turntable pretty much for the purpose of listening to old Beatles LPs because I couldn't stand the couple of CDs I bought. Whether the iTunes versions are any better I don't know - haven't had time to audition yet - but I suspect they are.

    48. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      NASA has one of the best public relations departments of any federal agency that I know of. Of course that isn't a particularly high bar to meet in terms of standards, but it is pretty good. I suppose that the National Park Service does pretty good as well, and the Department of Defense is learning the hard way on how to get that done. The TSA could certainly learn a few tips from NASA about PR work.

    49. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by man_ls · · Score: 1

      I think the Loudness War hit CDs, too. I picked up a large collection of discs stamped in the '90s/very early 2000s. I happen to also have a 1-year-old copy of the same album, something by Pearl Jam. The older CD sounds considerably better than the new CD. Much more dynamic range. Have to turn the stereo up a little more to hear it, though.

    50. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      The true question we have to ask is:

      Are Uranus jokes shifting research to other planets?!

      I mean, there's methane in Uranus...

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    51. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      You are talking about how ALH84001 was hyped up by the news media? I'm expecting a similar kind of announcement that certainly will be interesting but nothing that is earth moving.

      Regardless, I'm sure it will be blown out of proportion by the popular news media and it will likely be a lead story in the evening news as a "groundbreaking discovery".

      Unless of course they got a picture of a bipedal alien walking around Spirit or Opportunity. Somehow I strongly doubt that.

    52. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

      Are Uranus jokes shifting research to other planets?!

      A similar hypothetical question: Would the New Horizons spacecraft headed toward Pluto have been developed and launched if Pluto had always been designated a dwarf planet? (New Horizons launched in January 2006, and Pluto was demoted in August 2006.) Makes you wonder how much significance people attach to these labels.

    53. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

      Did George Lucas rape your childhood?

      No, George Lucas raped my memories of childhood, specifically those related to my impression of him as a great storyteller. It's like I have these really fond memories of eating cake, only now I know the cake is a lie.

    54. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by mug+funky · · Score: 1

      interesting. all the beatles i've heard on CD sounds just like the LP minus the crackle and distortion.

      there's probably a ton of versions out there though.

      and LPs are much more fun to play :)

    55. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since the announcement of the press conference says that the finding will impact the "search for evidence of extraterrestrial life," chances are they've found some potential signature of a metabolic process.

      Hmmm... taking what you said about the lack of the Cassini project lead to heart, and noting a lack of anyone attached to any particular observatory project in that list... Is it possible that the announcement won't actually be about a particular astronomical observation at all?

      Could it be that these scientists have discovered a plausible biological reaction which could take place in different extraterrestrial environments that simply gives them something new to look for in the future? That would count as an astrobiological finding, and would certainly impact the search for evidence of life.

      But would be liable to be even more disappointing to many people. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    56. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by slick7 · · Score: 1

      They found an old campsite with crushed Bud cans and used condoms on Titan.

      Nah, they're just trying to get ahead of Wikileaks.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    57. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      For the "future of life" bit, could be something cool relating to our ability to live in space.

      Yeah. One of the Russian cosmonauts downed a bottle of vodka and accidentally ejected himself out of an airlock. Long story short, turns out the whole humans-need-an-atmosphere-to-survive thing was just a myth. I'm planning on opening the first patio-bar on the moon.

    58. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by dudpixel · · Score: 1

      The true question we have to ask is:

      Are Uranus jokes shifting research to other planets?!

      I mean, there's methane in Uranus...

      This is true, however one wonders how bad it has to be before it warrants shifting to other planets?!

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    59. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      CommanderTaco made first contact with Uranus years ago.

      According to the press conference, all he got out of it was a steaming pile of....you know.

    60. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by pz · · Score: 1

      Excellent speculation.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    61. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Informative

      The version on iTunes are MP3s made from the 24-bit, 44KHz remaster from last year. Like every remaster for the past 15 years or so, it has dynamic range compression applied.

      This results in several things:

      • People notice sounds they never heard before, because the quiet parts of the songs are now 3-8dB louder than before. Almost every review comments on being able to hear things they couldn't before. In general, you will never hear anything "new" in a remaster that uses the same master tapes (as this one did) that you couldn't have heard before by turning up the volume.
      • The relative loudness of songs on the same album is messed up. For example, on Sgt. Pepper, "Fixing a Hole" now has peaks about 3-4dB louder than before, while other songs have peaks where they have always been. This is because of the "Loudness War" mentioned in another post. Despite the fact that it's supposed to be a quiet song, quiet songs are now "bad". "Blackbird" from the White Album suffers a similar fate.
      • Sounds that are supposed to be "big" just don't feel that way. For example, the hammer "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" doesn't stand out as much...it doesn't have as much impact, because it's not as much louder than the rest of the song as it should be. The classic example for this is Phil Collins "In the Air Tonight". Compressed on radio or the latest CD releases, the drum solo has very little impact.
    62. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The TSA might as well learn a thing or two about "consensual rape" from Apple. Next thing you know TSA molesting is ALL THE RAGE! and people will pay to get fingered, they will have fanboys (TSAfags) that will write thousands of words in forums about how being fingered by the TSA changed their lives, and how the other low-humans that opted out are retarded.

    63. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      I don't think we're jaded, really. I just think that the (at least perceived) magnitude of this announcement justifies expecting it to be something more than we've heard before. I don't think anyone (who isn't psychotic) expects them to come to the podium with a little green man in tow, but I would think it should be something more than a slight variation on what we've already heard before. In a best case scenario (in my mind), it might be something like, "We have evidence of a biological process going on on (insert planet or non-Earth moon here). Announcing they found amino acids on a meteorite or comet would be extremely anticlimactic, in my opinion.

    64. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Theres this living organism out there
      2. people go zomgistehaliens
      3. wikileaks gets smokescreened
      4. ???
      5. profit

    65. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      Roughly translated, isn't that the equivalent of, "Move along. Nothing to see here. Check back with us again in 30 years."?

      I do database searches for a living. "I thought of this new way to search" may be interesting to the searcher, but the client doesn't want or need to hear about it. The client is interested in the search results. The same thing applies here, I think. Calling a press conference to announce that you've discovered a new way to search for something borders on the narcissistic.

    66. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by mldi · · Score: 1

      "I assure you, it is completely necessary to feel your 5 year old's crotch."

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    67. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not unlike like the whole Apple/Beatles thing. What was so disappointing about that? Not being able to buy singles? Did George Lucas rape your childhood?

      Also, what the hell was wrong with getting it from Amazon or some other digital store?

    68. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      Means the results are here on earth. Five bucks says its about extremophiles in the transition area between the crust and the mantle.

    69. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yay, someone that can spell colour!

    70. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Felisa Wolfe-Simon -- evolutionary biology including metallic enzymes, specifically the potential role of arsenic in DNA
      Pamela Conrad -- biogeochemistry and organic chemical signatures of extremophiles
      Steven Benner -- geobiology of RNA, including detection of DNA and RNA
      James Elser -- the influence of nitrogen and phosphorus in biological processes including ecosystems, speciation and RNA

      Clearly they have discovered a race of Nitrogen breathing, metallic rock monsters.

    71. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Apparently not, we are supposedly losing bone density while living in space....this tells me if we live too long in space we might end up like birds with bones that are really light and easily broken.

    72. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I can see that:

      NASA: We've discovered that extremophiles can survive in space!
      Reporter: Didn't we already know that?
      NASA: No, we just strongly suspected it. But this proves that life could exist outside of earth.
      Reporter: But you haven't actually seen any life outside of earth yet?
      NASA: Well no...but it *could* be there
      Reporter: Again, didn't we already know that?
      NASA: Look, do you want to help us justify our budget, or just nitpick?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    73. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Lat3+Bl00m3r · · Score: 1

      "an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life" suggests a change in the way we're looking, and "follow the water" isn't the only game in town anymore.

    74. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I think it's most down to impluse buying. Someone hears that song on the radio and decides they want to listen to it again so they hop on iTunes. In fact there are a few apps for Android and iOS which identify songs by listening to them and then providing you with the band/song and a link to Amazon or iTunes where you can buy it. I'd love to know how much a referral nets them.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    75. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Emphasis on speculation. :)

      Oh well I guess we'll find out.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    76. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by bhartman34 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't call the ALH84001 announcement a dud. The announcement itself was pretty spectacular, actually. The discovery only turned into a dud afterward, when they couldn't get confirmation that the objects found were bacterial fossils. Actual, verified, honest-to-gods bacterial fossils would've been revolutionary.

    77. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 1

      No. Rhea's impact might be Earth-shattering. But even a meteorite would be minimal.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    78. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      Mary Voytek -- director, NASA Astrobiology program

      Felisa Wolfe-Simon -- evolutionary biology including metallic enzymes, specifically the potential role of arsenic in DNA

      Pamela Conrad -- biogeochemistry and organic chemical signatures of extremophiles

      Steven Benner -- geobiology of RNA, including detection of DNA and RNA

      James Elser -- the influence of nitrogen and phosphorus in biological processes including ecosystems, speciation and RNA

      ... Science is published on Fridays. Nature is published on Thursdays. It would seem like the paper is going to appear in Nature no matter what the exact announcement is.

      Given that the list is more a set of people with expertise in extremophile and alternative "life support" I'm more willing to bet that the announcement is closer to home (how about a hot spring or something)? Arsenic is just one period below phosphorous so it shares a lot of properties. My vote is either for identifying an extremophile which uses an ATAs style of energy storage as opposed to ATP - they're both triprotic so it could work. Alternatively they could have found a way (hot springs or in the lab) to replace the phosphate backbone of DNA with an arsenate binder - that'd really throw people for a loop since "alien DNA" will splash big over the headlines - way more than "toxic polyprotic acid replaces traditional cell fuel."

      You've hit the publication times dead on though - so if it's in one of those two it's probably pretty big

    79. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mass effect!

  2. Mmmmm. Seafood. by oldspewey · · Score: 4, Funny

    If there is life swimming in a big ocean under the ice of Europa, the question becomes: how does it taste?

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    1. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Americano · · Score: 2, Funny

      It tastes the same as anything else: like chicken.

    2. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by spun · · Score: 5, Funny

      It tastes Europaean.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      These days, even chicken doesn't taste like chicken.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Americano · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sure it does. You just have to adjust your expectations for what chicken tastes like.

    5. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 1

      If there is life swimming in a big ocean under the ice of Europa, the question becomes: how does it taste?

      For some reason I have to read the above (and the subject line) with a Dr. Zoidberg voice!

      --
      I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
    6. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by TheGreatGraySkwid · · Score: 1

      If there is life swimming in a big ocean under the ice of Europa, the question becomes: how does it taste?

      Like Tasty Wheat, of course. You remember Tasty Wheat?

      --
      The Humblest Mollusk on the Net
    7. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Somehow I find that hard to swallow.

    8. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by krou · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the matter Colonel Sanders? Chicken?

      --
      'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    9. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      If there is life swimming in a big ocean under the ice of Europa, the question becomes: how does it taste?

      Like a dog with no tongue.

    10. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by spun · · Score: 3, Funny

      African or Europaean swallow?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    11. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the Matrix got it wrong.

    12. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Guppy · · Score: 1

      These days, even chicken doesn't taste like chicken.

      "Now how did the machines know what Tasty Wheat tasted like, huh? Maybe they got it wrong. Maybe what I think Tasty Wheat tasted like actually tasted like, uh ... oatmeal or tuna fish. That makes you wonder about a lot of things. You take chicken for example. Maybe they couldn't tell what to make chicken taste like which is why chicken tastes like everything!"

    13. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      Don't you mean Iofrican?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    14. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Wumpus · · Score: 1

      You don't have to swallow to taste it.

    15. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by syousef · · Score: 1

      If there is life swimming in a big ocean under the ice of Europa, the question becomes: how does it taste?

      Not if you're Kirk. The questions revolve around whether any part of it is green, what it is anatomically possible to do with it, and what body parts will fall off if you do engage in such activity.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by spun · · Score: 1

      What do you suggest, swishing it around in your mouth and then spitting it out, like a wine tasting?

      Wait, what the hell are we talking about?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    17. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      That depends, is it carrying a coconut?

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    18. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not a paen....

    19. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by SheeEttin · · Score: 1
      Heh... reminds me of a joke from Stargate, regarding MREs:

      Daniel: Tastes like chicken.
      Carter: What's wrong with that?
      Daniel: It's macaroni and cheese.

    20. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fishy.

    21. Re:Mmmmm. Seafood. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      If chocolate tastes like chicken you're shopping at the wrong store.

  3. they found that the astrobiology budget was cut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    they found that the astrobiology budget was cut

    1. Re:they found that the astrobiology budget was cut by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

      This does meet all the criteria.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:they found that the astrobiology budget was cut by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      That's my vote too. They are going to say they are closing up shop, and thanks for the fish.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  4. I for one by slyrat · · Score: 1, Funny

    Welcome our astrobiological overlords.

    1. Re:I for one by nzwasp · · Score: 1

      Welcome our astrobiological overlords.

      You mean astro-microbiological

    2. Re:I for one by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      I for one seriously hope the announcement somehow involves William Shatner.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:I for one by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      You! Know! It! Probably! Won't!

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    4. Re:I for one by rarel · · Score: 1
      WE. FOUND. LIFE. OUT. THERE.

      yeah, would certainly be an Earth-shatnering event...

  5. Titan seems plausible by bl8n8r · · Score: 5, Informative

    "NASA believes it has found vital clues that alien life does indeed exist on Titan, "
    http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978743812

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
    1. Re:Titan seems plausible by ezwip · · Score: 0

      This prediction of their news release sounds entirely likely. It is boring and completely unexciting. I'd bet the farm on th.

      --
      "I guess I'm gonna fade into Bolivian."
  6. The Mars Rock by colmore · · Score: 1

    Last I heard, interpretation the Mars rock was "inconclusive."

    Maybe they've figured something out.

    --
    In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  7. How About We Scale It Back to Something Realistic? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    Or maybe they want to talk about a discovery confirming the suitability of possible targets for life or colonization? I'm guessing it's something along those lines ... or perhaps they have a target that they think they can deploy bacteria to that will provide a better atmosphere for possible habitation in the distant future?

    Think about it though. Would NASA announce contact or, you know, the president? I'm guessing that the politicians would be all over this claiming credit if it was something that big.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  8. Did they find the ancient gene? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Did they find the ancient gene?

    1. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please leave KISS out of this.

    2. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      except it was a stargate joke ... whoosh

    3. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      It's times like this we need a "-1: metawhoosh" moderation.

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    4. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Kepesk · · Score: 1

      Where have you been? They found that years ago and have been gene-therapying up the expedition on Atlan... I mean... What do you mean ancient gene? Really, I have no idea what you're DON'T DISAPPEAR ME PLEASE!!!

    5. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome....

    6. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      like the asterite in ecco the dolphin?

  9. It's smoke and mirrors by drumcat · · Score: 3, Funny

    They want you talking about aliens instead of TSA Gate Rape and Wikileaks. Simple as that.

    1. Re:It's smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's one helluva stretch, even for you.

    2. Re:It's smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn it I was going to say that! Probably a siting of a North Korean,Prince Andrew liking French alien to be precise

    3. Re:It's smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't +Interesting either.

    4. Re:It's smoke and mirrors by nizo · · Score: 1

      Stretch? Wait, just how invasive has the Freedom Patdown gotten anyway?

    5. Re:It's smoke and mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want you talking about aliens instead of TSA Gate Rape...

      Why does this always come back to Uranus?

    6. Re:It's smoke and mirrors by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      This conjures an image of the TSA performing an enhanced patdown on little grey man muttering "and this is for all the probing"

  10. ya? by nege · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I am totally jaded. When I see something like this I read it as "NASA calls press conference to remind government and people they are still here and need money, because what they do is really, really cool". Of course, I agree too, but I would be surprised if there was really any kind of life found. Prove me wrong NASA! I, for one, would welcome our new alien-insect overlords!

    1. Re:ya? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      The astrobiological finding is probably that their budget has been cut, once again, and the impact it has on the search for evidence of ET Life is that they won't anymore.

    2. Re:ya? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I, for one, would welcome our new alien-insect overlords!

      Our new alien-cephalopod overlords will be displeased by your racially insensitive remarks.

    3. Re:ya? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Tell lord Cthulu that current seven out of ten astrologers agree that it is not yet time for him to reawaken, and to take some damn sominex if he cant go back to sleep.

    4. Re:ya? by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NASA Administrator: We're putting a man on Mars!
      Reporter: When?
      NASA Administrator: 2055!
      Reporter: Long after your administration is gone and no longer around to be held accountable for any long-forgotten promises?
      NASA Administrator Yep!
      Reporter: What if 2055 comes along and we're no closer then to Mars than now?
      NASA Administrator: Well, you'll have to ask the NASA administrator about it then.
      Reporter: What if you're still alive and we ask you?
      NASA Administrator: I'll blame him.
      Reporter: Do you have anything to offer besides vague promises today?
      NASA Administrator: I have this cool animation.
      Reporter: Ooh, pretty.
      NASA Administrator: In conclusion, keep giving us money.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:ya? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd perhaps prefer them to be given a budget three orders of magnitude higher so it can be done in 4 years?

    6. Re:ya? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Well, we could do that. Or we could stop kidding ourselves and cut their funding altogether.

      Or we could keep doing what we're doing now--just throwing the money away with no hope of it ever returning an actual result.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:ya? by dwinks616 · · Score: 1

      No actual result? For crying out loud, Tang alone is worth every penny spent on our space program!

    8. Re:ya? by tsm_sf · · Score: 2

      Who cares about the piddly amounts drained by NASA when we've got the cavernous sinkhole of our military sucking up every available resource.

      Fuck, just make NASA a branch of the military and you assholes will salute every wheelbarrow of cash that trundles past.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    9. Re:ya? by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Its actually congress and the President's fault for what NASA doesn't end up doing.

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
  11. Amazing news by Quato · · Score: 4, Funny

    One of the NASA guys got laid!

    1. Re:Amazing news by gmuslera · · Score: 3, Funny

      NASA astronomer finds extramarital life

    2. Re:Amazing news by LoudMusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That is a film I don't want to see at 11.

      --
      No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
    3. Re:Amazing news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I actually banged a Vietnamese chick that worked at NASA doing tech support back in 2000. Just because she worked at NASA :)

    4. Re:Amazing news by treeves · · Score: 0

      Hopefully not by a woman who drove across the country wearing diapers so she wouldn't have to stop to pee. (OK, she didn't really wear diapers but it made for some fun jokes at the time)

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    5. Re:Amazing news by Tablizer · · Score: 1, Funny

      One of the NASA guys got laid!

      Then it must be alien life. Earth girls wouldn't.
         

    6. Re:Amazing news by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      "...explore strange new worlds"

    7. Re:Amazing news by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I actually banged a Vietnamese chick that worked at NASA doing tech support back in 2000. Just because she worked at NASA :)

      Spirit or Opportunity? Explains why that wheel froze up too.

         

    8. Re:Amazing news by SpeedBump0619 · · Score: 0

      Even Earth girls aren't *that* easy.

  12. What's up, doc? by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

    Maybe Bugs Bunny found Marvin?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  13. Oh, I know by bhcompy · · Score: 3, Funny

    They found Jita, but their probe got ganked trying to dock with the docking station. $300m in PLEX were lost

    1. Re:Oh, I know by JoeLinux · · Score: 1

      LOVE IT....and 300mil is only one plex. You heard about the other one, right?

      http://mofo.killmail.org/?a=kill_detail&kll_id=7309710

    2. Re:Oh, I know by gamricstone · · Score: 1

      yes but he said $300m, at $15 per plex thats roughly 20m plex. The key is he said dollars not kronas.

      --
      The economic anarchy of capitalist society as it exists today is, in my opinion, the real source of the evil. - Einstein
    3. Re:Oh, I know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or ISK as it were

  14. First contact probably went like this... by arikol · · Score: 1

    First contact probably went like this:
    NASA: "hello, you extremophile procariot. Take us to your leader"
    ""
    NASA: "hmm, he's being uncooperative. TASE him!"
    ""
    NASA: BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    1. Re:First contact probably went like this... by ricosalomar · · Score: 1

      Prokaryote?

    2. Re:First contact probably went like this... by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      No, a Procariot is someone from Procyon, like how a Cypriot is someone from Cyprus.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    3. Re:First contact probably went like this... by ricosalomar · · Score: 1

      Naturally. My bad.

    4. Re:First contact probably went like this... by dwinks616 · · Score: 1

      Procariot is the Romanian spelling for prokaryote, so my guess is the GP is Romanian and slipped on the translation.

    5. Re:First contact probably went like this... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a type of bacterium that causes dental cavities (caries), and lives in near-boiling salt water and metabolizes sulfur and iron.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  15. Taking a page from Apple? by khendron · · Score: 1

    It is probably all marketing fluff. NASA is taking a page from Apple.

    Probably Beatles music has been beamed in the direction of Alpha Centuri.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
    1. Re:Taking a page from Apple? by Zocalo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yeah, because that's one sure fire way of getting along with the stellar neighbours. Send them some "free" music today then, in a few weeks time, the RIAA sends in the lawyers and all their base belong to us...

      Um, 3 - profit???

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    2. Re:Taking a page from Apple? by zenjah · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps the Beatles will finally be available on the International Space Station?

    3. Re:Taking a page from Apple? by glwtta · · Score: 1

      It is probably all marketing fluff. NASA is taking a page from Apple.

      No, no, I'm sure it's the First Contact thing - that's the only reasonable assumption.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    4. Re:Taking a page from Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That actually sounds pretty good, and it doesn't even have to be done with our stellar neighbors, just send some pirated music to the sun and let the RIAA send their lawyers there.

    5. Re:Taking a page from Apple? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Probably Beatles music has been beamed in the direction of Alpha Centuri.

      Big mistake. A little over four years from now:

      "War Leader Kqaac, our translators say that the Earthlings believe that all you need is love."
      "Excellent, then the Earthlings have no defenses! Launch the attack fleets!"

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    6. Re:Taking a page from Apple? by farnsworth · · Score: 1

      Probably Beatles music has been beamed in the direction of Alpha Centuri.

      Not going to happen. Perhaps the biggest copyright wtf in the history of humanity: "Astronomer and science popularizer Carl Sagan had wanted [Here Comes The Sun] to be included on the Voyager Golden Record, copies of which were attached to both spacecraft of the Voyager program to provide any entity that recovered them a representative sample of human civilization. Although The Beatles favoured the idea, EMI refused to release the rights and when the probes were launched in 1977 the song was not included." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Here_Comes_The_Sun#Voyager_proposal

      --

      There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.

  16. another universe? by nege · · Score: 1

    Maybe we found another universe....

    "I have reached the Gateway to another Universe. I feel awed and strangely humbled by the momentous solemnity of this occasion..."

    "HEY OTHER UNIVERSE! BITE MY SHINY METAL ASS!"

  17. Obsidian Monoltiths? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA found, according to Wikileaks, large obsidian rectangular monoliths.

  18. My guess by thesandtiger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Spectroscopy showing a celestial body (or bodies) is in a state of chemical disequilibrium considered to be suggestive of life.

    --
    Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    1. Re:My guess by scrib · · Score: 1

      That's just what I was going to say!

      More or less... I read "astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life" as exactly that with the implied addition of "we found a promising target for a future mission! So we'll be needing to keep our jobs and get some more funding, tenkyuvedymuch."

      --
      Help! Help! I'm being repressed!
  19. Frungy Frungy Frungy by Caerdwyn · · Score: 4, Funny

    They found Fwiffo on Pluto.

    --
    Everybody gets what the majority deserves.
    1. Re:Frungy Frungy Frungy by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Kowalski, Fritz, Chin, O'Donnell, Luigi, and all three of the Liebermann Triplets will be missed.

    2. Re:Frungy Frungy Frungy by nightfire-unique · · Score: 1

      Happy days and jubilation!

      --
      A government is a body of people notably ungoverned - AC
    3. Re:Frungy Frungy Frungy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      lmao. seriously? no one got this?

      "We have come under fire from an alien vessel we found hiding on the surface of Pluto. Captain! They killed Kowalski, Fritz, Chin, O’Donnell, Luigi, and all three of the Libermann triplets! We have returned fire, but our stunner can’t penetrate the ship’s hull armor."

      http://lparchive.org/LetsPlay/Star%20Control%202/Update%203/

    4. Re:Frungy Frungy Frungy by obeythefist · · Score: 1

      I can just imagine the press release now.

      This... is.... SPATHI!!!!

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    5. Re:Frungy Frungy Frungy by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      And they're pissed that we demoted Pluto down from planet status.

    6. Re:Frungy Frungy Frungy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NASA will also announce that space exploration will terminate due to the discovery of a planetary shield erected around Earth.

      For more information, please go here.

  20. Not until thursday? by makubesu · · Score: 1, Funny

    Somebody wikileak this thing!

  21. I know what it is all about! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    One of the astrobiology guys just saved a bunch of money on his car insurance.

  22. Funding by El+Nigromante · · Score: 1

    I've heard rumors about NASA searching for funding and keeping the interest of the audience.

    Anyway, I think Hollywood has suspiciously prepared us well in the last decade for any kind of ALF finding.

  23. What could it be? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What exciting breaking news! I'm not going to sleep or eat until I hear what this is all about on Thursday at 2pm. Thanks /. !

  24. Mass relay? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't they have to find Prothean artifacts on Mars first? I'm hoping for a black monolith, myself.

    1. Re:Mass relay? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      There is no black monolith on Mars. There is a small one on the moon and a larger one in orbit of Jupiter, or on one of the moons of Saturn, depending on if you subscribe to the books or the movies. Arthur C. Clarke is my hero.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    2. Re:Mass relay? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, it is around Jupiter either way. The first book talked about Saturn, but the movie and the later books all used Jupiter because originally they weren't able to get a good rendering of Saturn's rings for the movie, and then Clarke discovered that Europa was more likely to support life than any of Saturn's moons and went with it.

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    3. Re:Mass relay? by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      There is no black monolith on Mars. There is a small one on the moon and a larger one in orbit of Jupiter, or on one of the moons of Saturn, depending on if you subscribe to the books or the movies. Arthur C. Clarke is my hero.

      You mean if you subscribe to the first book, or the movies AND the rest of the books in the series.

    4. Re:Mass relay? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I remember being really annoyed to find that the vicinity of Jupiter, including Ganymede, was subject to sufficient radiation to guarantee that there never would be a "Farmer in the Sky", at least not there.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    5. Re:Mass relay? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Arthur C. Clarke's ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to his newsletter.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    6. Re:Mass relay? by mldi · · Score: 1

      I remember being really annoyed to find that the vicinity of Jupiter, including Ganymede, was subject to sufficient radiation to guarantee that there never would be a "Farmer in the Sky", at least not there.

      Ah, but that's only on the surface.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    7. Re:Mass relay? by mldi · · Score: 1

      Nonsense, it is around Jupiter either way. The first book talked about Saturn, but the movie and the later books all used Jupiter because originally they weren't able to get a good rendering of Saturn's rings for the movie, and then Clarke discovered that Europa was more likely to support life than any of Saturn's moons and went with it.

      Speaking of Europa, I won't find any NASA announcements very exciting until they announce they're sending a submersible below that thick crust of ice on Europa. Yes, it'll be a pretty long time before that happens, but I'll be waiting nonetheless. I find it very hard to believe that there isn't life there.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
    8. Re:Mass relay? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      that thick crust of ice on Europa. Yes, it'll be a pretty long time before that happens, but I'll be waiting nonetheless. I find it very hard to believe that there isn't life there.

      While I agree with the general sentiment, unfortunately I have to point out that we have no evidence of any form of life anywhere in the universe other than on Earth. So while SF (and not-so-science-Fiction) is good entertainment, in our day-to-day lives we have to work on the assumption that we are the only life-bearing planet in the observable universe, and that our species as the most influential one on the planet bears responsibility if we destroy that.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    9. Re:Mass relay? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      True, but Clarke worked the strange surface characteristic of Iapetus into "2001".

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  25. Just idle speculation by Snowblindeye · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's funny how quick idle speculation turns into news. Apparently it all started with this blog post.

    He's now updated his post with a tweet from someone at Nasa that the press conference is not about proof of life:

    I'm sad to quell some of the @kottke-induced excitement about possible extraterrestrial life. I've seen the Science paper. It's not that

  26. The Loc-Nar! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    They have found it!

    1. Re:The Loc-Nar! by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      Well I suppose I could deal with the imminent apocalypse if it included getting down with Taarna.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    2. Re:The Loc-Nar! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      That could sound like an excellent master plan to repopulate the Earth after the apocalypse, sir.

  27. Please please please by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 4, Funny

    Please let it be a black monolith on the moon. We're only nine years late.

    1. Re:Please please please by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      Do you want to call an evolution-controlling, star-forming monolith late? Because they'll turn you into primordial soup faster than you can say "Arthur C. Clarke was right!"

    2. Re:Please please please by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      If it turns me into soup, I'll be too dead to give a shit. Besides, I wasn't calling the monolith late, but you humans. According to Clarke, you should have found the damn thing in 2001.

    3. Re:Please please please by Stripe7 · · Score: 1

      Black Monolith? Probably a Blue British Police Box.

    4. Re:Please please please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nine years, One book and a movie...

    5. Re:Please please please by rarel · · Score: 1

      yah after all maybe "2001" was simply a typo...

  28. It's life Jim by bobby1234 · · Score: 1

    Some of the key people are involved in the following programme

    http://astrobiology.asu.edu/Astrobiology/Home/Home.html

    This is could be interesting!

    1. Re:It's life Jim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering the joint publications of some of the scientists involved in the press conference, it could be related to a "shadow biosphere" - some previously unrecognized form of microbe or microbial metabolism on Earth that we thus far haven't been able to detect, sufficiently different to be considered alien to life as we know it. For example, one of them has been looking for life where phosphorus (a major element in cells) might be replaced by chemically-similar arsenic.

  29. More earth-shattering than that by Captain+Spam · · Score: 1

    "We called you all here today so that we may announce that we can actually make budget next year AND do something with it! WOOOOOOO!"

    (stunned gasps from audience)

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  30. WikiLeaks Preventative Announcement? by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 1

    given all the press and notoriety WikiLeaks is garnering of late - you have to imagine that there is more up their sleeves than boring old diplomatic dispatches to be handed out to the press!

    Even if they are in talks with someone who has knowledge of conspiracies to cover up UFOs, Contact, etc... they would have the media in an immediate and unstoppable frenzy

    --
    I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
  31. Deception Point by EkriirkE · · Score: 1

    If you don't mind bad science but a decent story, check out Deception Point by Dan Brown.

    tldr; NASA fakes ET for more funding.

    --
    from 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    to 45 2F 6E 40 3C DF 10 71 4E 41 DF AA 25 7D 31 3F
    1. Re:Deception Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot "bad writing", but at least it's better than "Decision Point" by that other guy.

    2. Re:Deception Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can usually turn a blind eye to bad science for a decent story (and The Da Vinci Code was really an excellent way to forget that I was trapped in a car traversing the plains states) but that's seriously the premise? I think if I read a whole book full of bad science only to find the author completely ignores all of the potentially interesting good science in favor of something so ludicrous... I think I might have to find Dan Brown and punch him in the face.

      So thanks for the spoiler, from me and Dan Brown.

  32. Maybe Titan...Maybe Earth's Shadow Biosphere. by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Some word out on the web, including NASA funded astrobiology teams (there are fourteen), seem to indicate the possibility of them finding something strange here on Mother Earth, probably something in or around Mono Lake according to some people and its arsenic based life forms. Since the major announcement last June by NASA concerning 'Titan and the Case of the Missing Hydrogen'. In fact one of the ladies on the panel this Thursday is in fact the researcher who is studying possible arsenic based life forms in Mono Lake. I'd say that she found something. One thing for certain, with the embargo we won't know for sure until Thursday. :)

    1. Re:Maybe Titan...Maybe Earth's Shadow Biosphere. by MozeeToby · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think we have a winner here. The article you linked mentions that she expects to see results over the next several months and was written slightly more than a year ago. That gives enough time to get results, tweak the experiment, analyze the results, even completely re-run the experiment if you think the results are ground breaking enough. The time span seems right, the other speakers are in related fields, it has direct influence on astrobiology. Specifically, it makes Titan a very interesting place to start looking for microbial, extra-terrestrial life.

    2. Re:Maybe Titan...Maybe Earth's Shadow Biosphere. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, an arsenic and old lace reboot...

    3. Re:Maybe Titan...Maybe Earth's Shadow Biosphere. by doconnor · · Score: 1

      Quirks and Quarks did a story in 2009 on "Alien life on Earth" about the possibility of life on earth the has independent origins then Life As We Know it. He describes the idea of arsenic based life as "really radical" compared to his other ideas.

  33. Fresh frozen waterworld food. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Funny

    I only deal with meta-chicken. Not a metaphor, but instead, meta-fried.

    Once, there was a murder of crows who were harassing some horses in the paddock near my barn. I yelled at them, told them that corral-ation wasn't caws-ation, but apparently they thought I was simply winging it.

    Also:

    Linux is forking good
    And Windows is forking not.

    I'm speaking of course
    Of a call in the source
    Just one of them has got

    If you need your code
    To go down both roads
    When choice becomes a Y

    Then Linux is better
    The one to get her
    Forking day and night

    Fork, fork, fork, fork
    Fork, fork, fork, fork
    Forkety-fork
    Fork-fork-fork.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
  34. Plant life by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Looking at the old moon landing photos, they've noticed plant life growing on the moon. You'll notice it just under the sigh that lights up and says "Quiet, set in use".

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  35. Fantastic News! by ATestR · · Score: 1

    "proof of life on Titan" to "first contact,"

    How about the fanatically optimistic view: "First contact by civilization on Titan."

    --
    âoeAny society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.
  36. Sigh... by Anomalyx · · Score: 1

    Here we go... Mars Rock all over again... NASA must want more grant money
    (very publicly/loudly) "Proof of extraterrestrial life!"
    (very privately/quietly and AFTER grant money comes through) "Whoops, sorry, it was actually a normal crystal formation"

    --
    No, there is no "-1 I'LL NEVER ADMIT BEING WRONG!!!" mod.
  37. Water Found on Third Planet from Sol! by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    My bet is that they're just going to tell us that the news Earth's Water Didn't Come From Outer Space will "impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life" in some minor way.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  38. Truly Exciting by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I realize I just read a completely sensationalist summary on slashdot, but I must say reading 'proof of life on titan' to 'first contact' sent that feeling through my body of true excitement and anticipation in a way that I haven't felt in a long time. You know, that spine tingling feeling (not in a bad way).

    I'm sure it will be a complete let down now, but finding life somewhere outside of our planet would really be one of those Earth shaking events I think, even if its just fossils from things long dead.

    Its nothing dangerous or NASA wouldn't be telling us about it, and its certainly not first contact as the governments wouldn't let them tell us about it, but ... OMFG I don't think I want to wait till Thursday

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Truly Exciting by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      OMFG I don't think I want to wait till Thursday

      "...if it wasn't for disappointment,
      I wouldn't have any appointments!"

    2. Re:Truly Exciting by JorDan+Clock · · Score: 1

      There's a snowball's chance in hell of any significant announcement...

  39. Uranus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'd personally like to see more research into the large, mysterious and likely uninhabitable world of Uranus.

  40. Happy Hanukkah! by felddy · · Score: 1, Troll

    "Opportunity had only enough engineering to last 90 days, yet it miraculously has lasted over twenty times that amount!! Happy Hanukkah! Oh yeah, and it found life. Gimel!" --NASA

    "P.S. Send gelt."

  41. Alien Segways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NASA is going to announce the availability of ultra-expensive moon-buggies.

  42. Rhea, Saturn's moon, no doubt by Yoik · · Score: 1

    The recent discovery of oxygen and CO2 on Rhea, makes it very likely that NASA will announce that there is evidence of life there. The evidence is announced; the interpretation is something they want to be careful with.

    1. Re:Rhea, Saturn's moon, no doubt by Rizz · · Score: 1

      Nah, it'll be confirmation that Keanu Reeves is going to destroy the word at the end of 2012. So, let's get off this rock. Now does anyone remember where we parked the spaceship?

  43. First contact? by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    The aliens wouldn't happened to be named either G'Gugvuntt or Vl'hurgs, would they?

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  44. No first contact.... by mseeger · · Score: 1

    .... instead the NASA managed a "first post" on slashdot story. Sources are cited that chances for that are slightly lower than finding intelligent life on Mars or GOP convention.

  45. Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The extra terrestrials have been among us for years. They have also been on Facebook for just as long.

    NASA finally is coming around to making a public announcement about it. They want everyone to just be friends...

    - jrk

  46. The invasion begins in 15 minutes.... by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Run!!!

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:The invasion begins in 15 minutes.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shitshitshit! Where do I go!?!

      P.S. If you wouldn't have waited two days to give me fifteen minutes notice, I could have spent this time quitting my job and getting laid. Or at least trying. "Seriously, baby—Trust me. I wouldn't ask if the world weren't coming to and end!"

  47. The found by confused+one · · Score: 1

    a stargate and figured out how to make it work. But now the aliens know we exist...

  48. Bow down to your new masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new alien overlords. It will either be a case of 'in Soviet Russia' or 'Yoda' speak - I'm not quite sure yet. Or, firmly putting my sparkly tin-foil hat on, perhaps they (TPTB) will reveal that the moon =really is= a Death Star! Where's my lightsaber! :-)

  49. The Swarm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or rather The Swarm by Frank Schaetzing, about non-fake non-ET.

    1. Re:The Swarm by treeves · · Score: 1

      Isn't almost *any* novel (by anyone other than Whitley Strieber) about non-fake non-ET?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  50. Reptilian humanoids. by joeszilagyi · · Score: 1

    What else could it be?

    --
    Dude, where's my packet?
    1. Re:Reptilian humanoids. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Humanoid reptilians. Even worse, from the reptilian point of view.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    2. Re:Reptilian humanoids. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      A discovery that there are 4 full rotations of the Earth in one 24-hour day. You dumby!

  51. Yep... by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

    I know some Civil Servants at JSC. It's "big talk" around there. As in, they are making a huge amount of hype about it, but evidently, it's nothing new.

    And no, they wouldn't tell me what part of NASA is pushing this or what "it" was other than a desperate attempt to get NASA some attention.

  52. WikiLeaks? by Scratch+McGoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have a sneaking suspicion that this newly scheduled announcement is in some way related to the latest WikiLeaks release. Is NASA trying to get ahead of some potential situation with this announcement?

  53. Documents by spitzak · · Score: 3, Funny

    Not only alien life, they have a trove of hundreds of thousands of documents from the alien government! Describing advanced graft and corruption abilities that are centuries beyond our own!

    1. Re:Documents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only alien life, they have a trove of hundreds of thousands of documents from the alien government! Describing advanced graft and corruption abilities that are centuries beyond our own!

      Evidence that the TSA is groping aliens but has failed to stop them from infiltrating our airports?

    2. Re:Documents by Sean_Inconsequential · · Score: 1

      The government of Rhea is pressing charges against Julian Assange for espionage for the releasing of thousands of their classified diplomatic documents.

    3. Re:Documents by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Not only alien life, they have a trove of hundreds of thousands of documents from the alien government!

      And they said Earthlings are so lame we don't even have flying cars yet; and that our scrotum design is "proof God gets drunk". This means war!
         

  54. A few clues.... by TomRC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you look at the list of participants, it may provide a clue:

    Participants are:
    - Mary Voytek, director, Astrobiology Program, NASA Headquarters, Washington
    - Felisa Wolfe-Simon, NASA astrobiology research fellow, U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, Calif.
    - Pamela Conrad, astrobiologist, NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md.
    - Steven Benner, distinguished fellow, Foundation for Applied Molecular Evolution, Gainesville, Fla.
    - James Elser, professor, Arizona State University, Tempe

    If you follow up the connection of James Elser to NASA, it turns out to be a project called "Follow the Elements"

    http://astrobiology.asu.edu/Astrobiology/Home/Home.html

    So I'm guessing that they've found certain exo-planets in the Goldilocks zone that have the right balance of precursor elements/molecules for life.

    1. Re:A few clues.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascinating if that's the case, truly fascinating, but not unexpected.

      When I heard about the press conference I thought they'd found liquid water on Mars or made new measurements of the methane on Mars.

  55. Dr Felisa Wolfe-Simon's work. by anzha · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the individuals in the scheduled press announcement has a website and based on her work my bet is that they may have found some indications that there is life on earth that uses arsenic instead of phosphorus.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
    1. Re:Dr Felisa Wolfe-Simon's work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean besides disgruntled housewives?

    2. Re:Dr Felisa Wolfe-Simon's work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Felisa and Steve are on the same paper, from her site:

      http://www.ironlisa.com/Davies_etal_Astrobio2009.pdf

      Also I have seen her on a documentary before about shadow bio-spheres. She was looking at some low-level life that arsenic wouldn't kill. She found them in Lake Mono and i suspect this confirmation of organic life on earth that no only eats arsenic but is made with arsenic.

    3. Re:Dr Felisa Wolfe-Simon's work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed, she found a bacteria in Lake Mono of which the building block is arsenic instead of the "normal" C, H, O, N, S, P combo.

      Makes the chances of any life out there a whole lot more plausible if you are not restricted to the standard organics.

  56. Matt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems most likely:
    http://www.deccanherald.com/content/47114/proof-life-mars-come-year.html

  57. Getting a manned spacecraft to Titan and back by Danathar · · Score: 1

    And you thought getting to Mars would be difficult. Getting to Titan and back with humans is one of those ideas that is crazy hard, but not implausible. Of course we don't know HOW we could do it, but it seems to be more of an engineering problem (among other issues). Trying to go to Titan would be WAY cooler (no pun intended) than trying to to to Mars.

    1. Re:Getting a manned spacecraft to Titan and back by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Assuming that you have a nuclear fusion reactor that tied with something like a strong ion-thrust engine or something like VASMIR can put out thrust of about 9.8 m/s^2, a trip to Titan would be something similar to a trans-Pacific voyage of 200 years ago. Long, perhaps somewhat dangerous, but certainly well within the scope of physics and something which current technology is getting close to perfecting.

      A trip to Titan doesn't hold a candle to a trip to another star system, which to get that accomplished in under a year or two would require finding a way around pretty tough physical theories like Relativity that suggest it can't be done.

    2. Re:Getting a manned spacecraft to Titan and back by Danathar · · Score: 1

      I agree. The technologies you mentioned would be sure to be used. Problems of protecting the travelers from radiation as a result of solar flares and the native radiation zone around Saturn would also be a concern.

    3. Re:Getting a manned spacecraft to Titan and back by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Water turns out to be an excellent shield against most radiation, including solar flares. Basically if you put about a foot or so of water around your cabin or living space, it would protect you against almost all major forms of radiation you would encounter while in "deep space". The radiation close to Saturn or going through the Van Allen Belts of the Earth are best dealt with by spending as little time in them as possible.

      The water would also serve as a source of something to drink and take care of other needs while enroute, including reaction mass for thrusting and other useful purposes as well. It is also something fairly universal throughout the solar system to find and extract.

      Keep in mind that astronauts did just fine traveling to the Moon, although it should be pointed out that the Apollo missions did take place during a solar sunspot minimum with unusually calm conditions on the Sun. JFK got lucky on choosing a date ("by the end of this decade" in the 1960's) when this was the case.

  58. Ian's law.... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    The least sensational explanation is usually the correct one.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  59. Anyone game? by xednieht · · Score: 1

    10:1 says its some statement strung together by a bunch of assumptions, conjectures, and hypothesis without any real proof of any biological entity actually being anywhere but here on Earth.

    --

    Hope is the currency of fools
    1. Re:Anyone game? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm gonna bet that Pluto is being reinstated to its full glory.

  60. I think you're getting the wrong impression... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're just going to talk about the illegal nationals squatting the Shuttle Launch Pad.

  61. Even More Likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'Due to budget cutback, all further work on this and similar projects will cease immediately.'

    For Sale Cheap!
    Used radio telescopes around the world.
    Also available; used space shuttles in various states of disrepair.

    That is all.

  62. I wonder if it's big enough to. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if this will be big enough news to distract people from the scandals arising from the Wikileaks thing.

    Also, look for Octo-Moms to lead police on high-speed chases in Black SUVs over the coming days. Down a well.

    -FL

    1. Re:I wonder if it's big enough to. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are no scandals in the wikileaks thing, just politics - why hasn't wikileaks been taken down yet? Even if they were simply handed the material, publishing classified information is illegal and the site is based in San Mateo, CA.

    2. Re:I wonder if it's big enough to. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

      There are no scandals in the wikileaks thing, just politics - why hasn't wikileaks been taken down yet? Even if they were simply handed the material, publishing classified information is illegal and the site is based in San Mateo, CA.

      It hasn't been taken down yet because it serves Israel.

      And anybody who bases what is and isn't appropriate simply on what happens to be 'Legal' without paying due respect to what is Right has failed to understand the purpose of the legal system.

      -FL

    3. Re:I wonder if it's big enough to. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if this will be big enough news to distract people from the scandals arising from the Wikileaks thing.

      Also, look for Octo-Moms to lead police on high-speed chases in Black SUVs over the coming days. Down a well.

      -FL

      There may well be a wikileak regarding this! I am sure Hillary Clinton sent a cable to Titan in 1999.

  63. Cosmos by sirrunsalot · · Score: 1

    What a great time to head over to Hulu and watch the master at work.

  64. the big new is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PLUTO IS A PLANET AGAIN!

  65. That's great! by Geek_Cop · · Score: 1

    Now FIX ZERG

  66. "Possible intelligent life found on......" by BLToday · · Score: 1

    Earth.

    I know, I can't believe it either.

  67. New LIfe Form? by hduff · · Score: 1

    Evidence of Cheetos-based lifeforms found in Mom's basement?

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  68. Microbial life on Mars: found by Viking in 1976 by Maow · · Score: 1

    Maybe this is an announcement concerning the recent meta-studies of Viking landers' data from 1976 that showed off-gassing of Martian soil (non-sterilized samples only), following a 26 hour period (i.e. Martian circadian cycle).

    The off-gasing of Martian soil was detected daily for something like 9 *weeks*!

    Too busy to find all links in /. archive, but maybe others can recall the story here before...

  69. Obligatory Futurama quote by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

    Fry: [smelling Saturn via the smelloscope] Pine needles. Oh, man, this is great... hey, as long as you don't make me smell Uranus.
    Leela: I don't get it.
    Professor Hubert Farnsworth: I'm sorry, Fry, but astronomers renamed Uranus in 2620 to end that stupid joke once and for all.
    Fry: Oh. What's it called now?
    Professor Hubert Farnsworth: Urrectum. Here, let me locate it for you.

    --
    Online Starcraft RPG? At
    Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
  70. James by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi everyone, Follow the recent discussions over IRC chat about what you think it's going to be

    connect at:

    irc.relaydb.com

    #NASA

    ---

    Quite worrying in a way!!!

  71. Re:How About We Scale It Back to Something Realist by Teancum · · Score: 1

    Announcing contact with an alien civilization? There are already protocols established for how that would happen, and there might be an outside chance this is the case, but I would think your are correct that this wouldn't be a bunch of NASA scientists trying to build up their little department but rather something coming straight from the White House, as it would have some strong political implications.

    This is a possibility: There might have been a discovery of an Earth-like planet around another star system that is in the "goldilocks zone" with a mass close to that of the Earth (which I put as 0.9x to 1.5x the mass of the Earth) with detection of substantial quantities of oxygen and water vapor in the atmosphere, and perhaps a "glint" of liquid water on its surface. That would be an interesting discovery certainly worth a major announcement, and something that is on the threshold of some of the technology NASA has been putting into space, assuming of course that the planet orbits the star at the right angle to be detected in this manner (for its orbit relative to the tangential direction of observation from the Earth/Solar System in general).

    Speculation is fun here, and I don't know what it could be.

  72. Actual info linked here: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://nasawatch.com/archives/2010/11/mediablogger-ex.html

    God damn, Taco, you are one monumental bonehead. How can you possibly as naive as you are? Do you find yourself absolutely fascinated by childrens toys in the lobbies of doctors offices? THEY ARE SO SHINY! Aren't they?! AND COLORFUL! WOW!

  73. Seriously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The news release says the conference is "to discuss an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life". From that you get "OMG THERE IS REALZ ET?!" What kind of deficiency in critical thinking accounts for that? Is there a clinical explanation?

  74. No life? by xluap · · Score: 1

    an "astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life."...............

    Maybe they found there is NO life at planets where possible signs of life where seen.

  75. A more plausible possibility by allan.drummond · · Score: 1

    Despite breathless pronouncements above, "an astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life" is equally consistent with the diversion, effective immediately, of 100% of U.S. astrobiology funding to pharmaceutical research.

  76. Naw dude by nu1x · · Score: 1

    They found green meadow like surface, anomalous IR output and strangely increased gravitation in Charon, the Pluto's satellite.

    --
    I have nothing to lose but my bindings.
  77. God, is that you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, we found God, and he seemed pretty pissed that we woke him up - he mumbled something about expecting a wrath in roughly 2 years."

  78. Blahblahmetry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the technical term for a stream of tweets, right?

  79. Anonymous coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop the speculation and read the webpage of Felisa Simon-Wolfe, her research is about Arsenic and its use in biochemistry, she and Steven Benner have had articles suggesting that arsenic could replace phosphate in living organisms and MOST LIKELY it has to do with that. What this means is that life in the universe can use other elements instead of phosphate to make things such as DNA. www.ironlisa.com

  80. MMm, O/OREOS by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    You know what I like best about that satellite? The creamy white filling.

  81. Synthetic cells..Perhaps? by Sla$hPot · · Score: 0

    I bet it's something along with this:
    http://www.nature.com/news/2010/100520/full/news.2010.253.html

    or this:
    http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20827815.800-50-ideas-to-change-science-artificial-life.html

    If it is. Then we can soon replace our plastic office plants with "living" plastic plants. Just add methane.

  82. Sarah Palin by jamessnell · · Score: 1

    They're probably just calling out Sarah Palin for being the Romulan we all already know her to be.

  83. Ion feed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google STS75 P