Slashdot Mirror


Does the End of KOffice Mean the End of KDE?

jfruhlinger writes "Venerable Linux office suite KOffice has been reborn as "Calligra," a name meant to evoke calligraphy but perhaps a bit too close to the neme of a deranged Roman emperor. Perhaps more importantly, Calligra seems to be cooperating with the future MeeGo mobile Linux distro. Could this be the beginning of the end of the KDE desktop, at least under its current branding?"

163 of 233 comments (clear)

  1. Oh no by stoolpigeon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not just the end of KDE - but the end of all life on earth!
     
    What a stupid headline. Page views, clicks, etc. Yeah I know.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    1. Re:Oh no by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny

      not just the end of KDE - but the end of all life on earth! What a stupid headline. Page views, clicks, etc. Yeah I know.

      Now hold on just one minute Capt. Hyperbole. When taking into account the release delays, the infighting and the whole Mayan calender/2012 thing this just might be the first domino in the end of all life on earth!

    2. Re:Oh no by JustOK · · Score: 2

      good thing we have backups.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    3. Re:Oh no by suy · · Score: 1

      What a stupid headline. Page views, clicks, etc. Yeah I know.

      Absolutely. The guy just says that is the end of KDE because, originally, it meant "desktop environment", and now there is software for non desktops, such as tablets or phones.

      Well dude, it's been a year since that changed. Now KDE is the name of the community. And that community started developing a DE, but now develops a lot more.

      Some changes in the KOffice situation required a rename, but renaming KDE just because that people is doing software for more platforms is absurd.

    4. Re:Oh no by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ob. SMBC

      Maybe that should go for Slashdot headlines as well.

    5. Re:Oh no by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Who uses Koffice? I have little use at home at all for an office suite, but on the rare times I do, I use OpenOffice. And tellingly (meaning "telling that TFA's authors are morons"), kubuntu comes with OO as the default rather than KO.

      As to "at least under its current branding?" why should I care about branding?

    6. Re:Oh no by AaronW · · Score: 1

      I use it when I want to do something quick. It's far more lightweight than Open Office/Libre Office.

      --
      This post is encrypted twice with ROT-13. Documenting or attempting to crack this encryption is illegal.
    7. Re:Oh no by MarkRose · · Score: 2

      I use it. OpenOffice is a pig, its UI is an eyesore, its mouse cursors are weird, etc. The only thing OO is better at (for me) than KO is support for Microsoft formats.

      --
      Be relentless!
    8. Re:Oh no by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Back in the early 2000s I used Koffice to fork processes off from our applications. It was very nice to be able to send thousands of data points to a spreadsheet which had graphing and just pass calls and not have to write all that code.

    9. Re:Oh no by HermMunster · · Score: 1

      So the offshoot office app from KDE changes it's name and someone thinks that it's the end of KDE? How ridiculously stupid an idea is that. Sheesh.

      --
      You can lead a man with reason but you can't make him think.
    10. Re:Oh no by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      >What a stupid headline. Page views, clicks, etc. Yeah I know.

      I expected better from Josh, but I suppose the Comics Curmudgeon site isn't exactly a fount of money, and one needs some of that stuff to get by...

  2. Typo in summary by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is clearly a typo in the summary, this is a KDE project so it would have to be Kalligra.

    1. Re:Typo in summary by drolli · · Score: 4, Funny

      no, its going to be intgrated into CDE

    2. Re:Typo in summary by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      The Caligula Debauchery Environment?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:Typo in summary by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Like Gwenview

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    4. Re:Typo in summary by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where can I download that?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Typo in summary by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    6. Re:Typo in summary by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2

      There should be a separate mod for on-topic links to that particular site. Achievement unlocked.

    7. Re:Typo in summary by Compuser · · Score: 1

      OK, now I have seen it all... A goatse linked labeled "informative"... Who was the genius behind that moderation (no pun intended)?

    8. Re:Typo in summary by jseale · · Score: 1

      There is clearly a typo in the summary, this is a KDE project so it would have to be Kalligra.

      Yeah! Besides, removing or toying with KOffice in any way would be sacreligious. Geez!

    9. Re:Typo in summary by A+Jew · · Score: 1

      I think it has been somewhat fashionable since KDE 4.0 Alpha to use C instead of K.

  3. Re:Kalligra by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2

    Indeed, what did happen to them? If they are in the process of rebranding it would be nice if someone wrote an article about it so that we would know.

    --
    It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
  4. Re:Kalligra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What happened to that annoying K in all names of the K Desktop Environment?

    They went to the same place all the intuitive configuration options went in GNOME.

    That's right. I went there.

  5. KDE by radicalpi · · Score: 2

    Just because one of the many apps built with KDE has been re-branded doesn't mean everything else will be. Re-branding an app can help them re-market and re-invet the image for KOffice and loosen the implied restriction of running only under KDE. Changing the name of KDE doesn't benefit them seeing as how Desktop environments aren't really marketed to end-users, and even in the Linux world, most either don't care or already have a preference.

    1. Re:KDE by JarekC · · Score: 1

      I agree with the parent. I don't see any reason why KDE would follow KOffice an change the name. TFA does not provide any valid reason either, only wide speculations. And even if KDE guys decided to rebrand it, I don't see how it would mean the End of KDE? After all, a rose by any other name ...

    2. Re:KDE by makomk · · Score: 1

      And even if KDE guys decided to rebrand it, I don't see how it would mean the End of KDE?

      You're missing some details. The reason for the rebranding was, essentially, that most of the developers had decided to refocus their efforts on Nokia's FreOffice mobile office suite and had largely abandoned desktop KOffice. It had reached the point that most of their interaction with the "official" KOffice SVN trunk was just adding bug fixes for bugs found in the FreOffice development process, and all the development and testing was done on Nokia's fork of the repository and Nokia's schedule. The maintainer of KWord wasn't too happy about this - he was very keen for KOffice to be widely used on the desktop - and the resulting dispute was acrimonious enough that it ended in a fork with neither side using the KOffice name.

    3. Re:KDE by A+Jew · · Score: 1

      It's especially good for a name like KOffice. I never knew if I should pronounce it Kay Office or cofis (as in cough).

  6. catchy subject line by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've always used KDE, but never KOffice. So what.

  7. Why should it? by haeger · · Score: 1

    They're based on the same technology, but other than that, what do they have to do with each other? You can run one without the other.
    So the short answer would be "No".

    I enjoy KDE and use it daily. I would use KOffice more if there was a better project management tool than KPlato included but alas, there isn't.
    Time to donate some more Paypal money their way so that I can close that account. Btw, what alternatives are there to paypal? You know, companies that atleast pretend to support democracy.

    --
    You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    1. Re:Why should it? by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Excuse me, parent is looking for alternatives, not excuses. PayPal may just be complying with the CIA, that doesn't mean it doesn't need to be dropped.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    2. Re:Why should it? by Asic+Eng · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Wikipedia certainly doesn't break the law in the jurisdiction it operates in. Your interpretation of the "law" would basically make any investigative journalism a criminal activity.

      I'm all for government transparency and accountability

      You are all for it, as long as those words mean nothing specific. Just a lofty goal "government transparency - yeah I'm for it". Reporting government wrongdoing or dubious activity, if said government would rather nobody found out ... well that would take things too far. Transparency is only for those cases when the government likes being transparent, it appears.

      I'm assuming PayPal was pressured a bit in this matter.

      Poor PayPal. Were they sued? Was there a court order? Or is it enough when some government agency makes threatening phone calls?

    3. Re:Why should it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't you dare conflate the privacy and integrity of the civilian on the street with the secrecy of a government infested with powertripping psychopaths who are supposed to represent you, whom are employed by you, and are committing illegal acts in your name and trying to protect their own sorry asses by extensive misuse of secrecy.

      I duly note that you ignored every single question I asked, especially about Ellsberg and the NYT, which speaks volumes of you and how well thought out your position is. And frankly, using the rest of the "reply" for nothing but a couple of lame ad hominem attacks tells the rest.

      I like my democracy thank you very much, I'm sorry it makes me a zealot that I want to keep it. I suggest you take your neo-fascist tyranny and shove it up your ass. I'm sure you'll like it.

      And btw, I'm NOT the AC who were refering to your wife, my original reason for posting AC is that I can't be bothered to find out a username that is't already used, only to get another password to track. So much for that assumption, smart ass.

    4. Re:Why should it? by haeger · · Score: 1

      They just now started breaking the TOS? Or is PayPal just really really slow?
      And what is it that they're doing that is a breach? Displaying the stolen documents? Isn't this what every journalist is supposed to do? Are all journalist organizations banned from PayPal, or just wikileaks?

      And embedded media isn't a "free press". That's more of a propaganda department. Why do you think the military allows it?

      That said I've been a happy customer for several years but I have to protest in some way, what other way would you suggest if not this? I'm also cancelling my visa-card and will pick another that don't hate freedom. ;-)
      (yes, that was irony)

      --
      You are not entitled to your opinion. You are entitled to your informed opinion. -- Harlan Ellison
    5. Re:Why should it? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The "propoganda department" had no qualms reporting on Iraqi civilians killed by US bombings, or Abu Ghraib prison, etc.

      The coverage hasn't been all positive.

      As for PayPal just now enforcing their TOS, like I said, I assume PayPal was pressured into their decision.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:Why should it? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Wikileaks has been threatened with criminal penalties by congressmen, senators, the sitting sec of state and attorney general. While I might academically consider a case that wikileaks is not a criminal organization.... that's far more than most criminal organizations face.

    7. Re:Why should it? by basotl · · Score: 2

      I've been using Google Checkout for my own needs with handling transactions for donations and payments. It's done the job well and has rates comparable to Paypal.

      --
      HTC EVO 4G LTE w/ CM 10.2 | NookColor w/ CM 10.2 | Samsung Epic 4G w/ CM 10.1
  8. Tag: Troll by bcmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's tag this story "troll" and move on quickly.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    1. Re:Tag: Troll by think_nix · · Score: 5, Funny

      How about "Krap" ?

    2. Re:Tag: Troll by La+Gris · · Score: 1

      Kapla!

      --
      Léa Gris
    3. Re:Tag: Troll by camperdave · · Score: 1

      How about "Krap" ?

      What is that? Some sort of virtual record scratching software for hip hop artists?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  9. Re:Kalligra by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    KAbandoned, I KGuess.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  10. Re:Kalligra by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Everyone complained they were annoying so know you've got Plasma, Strigi, Gwenview, Dolphin, Marble, Calligra, etc.

    I also didn't understand why everyone complained when KDE did it, but not Gnome?

    And it never really bothered me. A brand new user knew the difference between GCalc and KCalc. But they may be confused by Abacus.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  11. Beginning of the end by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    The day you born you started to die. You can point any event as "the beginning of the end" of anything that is not eternal. But that one classical KDE app is renamed to something that have no K have more or less the same weight that a gnome app having a name that don't starts with g (and didnt saw any comment about the beginning of the end of gnome when one of such apps got released or renamed).

  12. We hardly knew you... by bbh · · Score: 1

    It is official; Netcraft now confirms; KDE is dying

    1. Re:We hardly knew you... by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Who's Netcraft?

      --
      This is blinging
    2. Re:We hardly knew you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is official; Netcraft now confirms; KDE is dying

      Who's Netcraft?

      Sorry, Netkraft.

  13. Re:Oblig ... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

    Precisely my feeling as well. While everyone else, Microsoft included, was pushing for a cleaner desktop, KDE seemed to be pushing the messy desktop paradigm from the Windows 95-XP days. I just found it very clunky.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  14. Yeah, totally. by maakri · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes. Totally. Because the only reason people use KDE is so they can get KOffice.

    1. Re:Yeah, totally. by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Quite. I've switched desktops quite a bit over the years - currently on Gnome as that's the default for Mint - but I can honestly say that in the years that I was happily using KDE, I hardly ever touched Koffice at all. I either used OpenOffice or Vi - and I still do.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  15. Re:Kalligra by Kjella · · Score: 5, Informative

    The real hint is this:

    Currently all applications except Calligra Words will be maintained by their respective KOffice developers.

    It's more than a renaming, they split. However, when the dust cleared only the KWord developers went with the other group, the rest of the KOffice projects joined what's now Calligra. As far as I can tell the KWord guys wanted to focus on competing with MS Office and OpenOffice for the desktop, while the Calligra Words guys wanted to focus more on mobile. With enough different agendas going on in the same project they had conflict and eventually split. That's at least as far as I've caught the story.

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  16. Neme by necro81 · · Score: 1

    Probably it's a typo, and they meant to write "name" with reference to Calligula, but what the hell is a "neme". Is that some new-fangled internet term for a name-meme? And what the hell is that supposed to mean?

    Yes, I googled it, and got no satisfaction. YMMV.

    1. Re:Neme by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 2

      No, it is new and you nailed it. A neme is a name and meme combined into one. This may be the first time one has been spotted in the wild. Good catch.

    2. Re:Neme by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      Probably it's a typo, and they meant to write "name" with reference to Calligula, but what the hell is a "neme". Is that some new-fangled internet term for a name-meme? And what the hell is that supposed to mean?

      Yes, I googled it, and got no satisfaction. YMMV.

      It's a new, made-up word that's popularized through internet dissemination. There's in fact a word for that: memologism.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
  17. Re:Kalligra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone complained they were annoying so know you've got Plasma, Strigi, Gwenview, Dolphin, Marble, Calligra, etc.

    I also didn't understand why everyone complained when KDE did it, but not Gnome?

    And it never really bothered me. A brand new user knew the difference between GCalc and KCalc. But they may be confused by Abacus.

    Its annoying that they aren't there now. How am I supposed to know Plasma and Dolphin are KDE apps now?

  18. neme? by tigre · · Score: 2

    A portmanteau of meme and name?

  19. Yes by noidentity · · Score: 1
    Answer to question: yes

    Also, what's a "neme"?

  20. Re:Oblig ... by MikeUW · · Score: 1

    Ok...say what you want, but Win95 through to Win7 have perfectly clean desktops...until you litter them with icons/apps, which is totally under your own control. Same can be said for just about any other desktop, including KDE 3.x.

    That said, you really should take a look at the latest KDE...or at least one of the many 4.x releases over the past couple years. It's about as clean as it gets as far as I'm concerned.

  21. Rebranding by Enderandrew · · Score: 4, Informative

    KDE has been rebranding, and not just in removing the K from all their applications. KDE is a project, and a non-profit entity (KDE e.V.). The software compilation they release is now known as KDE SC.

    I don't see any reason for alarm over rebranding. KDE is getting more contributers and developers every year. Even many of the die-hard haters who railed against the 4.0 release have come back into the fold loving the current KDE releases. And for all the hate about Plasma, the Plasma framework makes it quite easy to create new activities and shells, making KDE on netbooks, tablets and phones considerably more viable.

    I find it interesting that Ubuntu is trying to find a way to create one interface/shell on every device, and yet they pay so little attention to KDE, Plasma and Qt. With KDE activities, I can switch instantly between a netbook activity (which I may prefer on the tiny resolution netbook screen) and a more standard desktop activity/shell when I use the video output to use a larger display.

    I can keep many of the same apps, conventions, etc. across multiple devices while still focusing on a activity/shell that is best suited to that size/resolution/device.

    I'm actually really excited about the future of KDE.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Rebranding by jbolden · · Score: 2

      I honestly think Ubuntu is going to break from Gnome soon. Gnome's direction and Ubuntu's are opposite. Ultimately KDE could use a parent distribution and Ubunto needs more clout and ain't going to get it in RedHat's DE.

    2. Re:Rebranding by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      When (if) Ubuntu breaks from Gnome it will be the start of the decline of Ubuntu.

      Ubuntu is the first distribution that gets normal people using Linux. And that is because they can use it. It is simple and uncluttered enough to be usable for them. Once they get comfortable they might discover more about the underlying system. With KDE as desktop you don't have that. It is way more in your face and it simply isn't workable out of the box.

      You know it, I know it. So let's not pretend, OK?

    3. Re:Rebranding by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Suse is relatively neutral now. It certainly helps but its not nearly as focused as RedHat is with Gnome. In terms of upstream work, it seems like with the Wayland/Unity thing they are going to have to do lots and lots of upstream work.

    4. Re:Rebranding by jbolden · · Score: 1

      With KDE as desktop you don't have that. It is way more in your face and it simply isn't workable out of the box.

      Ubunu would be using likely using a more locked down version. The whole move with Unity is they want to be simpler than Gnome.

    5. Re:Rebranding by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      SUSE does focus on both KDE and Gnome. openSUSE lists KDE as the default, while SLED ships Gnome as the default.

      openSUSE may ship the best KDE packages of any distro out there, so a lot of people associate openSUSE with KDE.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:Rebranding by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I still think Canonical should buy SUSE. Novell was just sold, but I don't know if Attachmate wanted the Linux division particularly.

      It sounds crazy to suggest because I hate a lot of things about Ubuntu and love SUSE, but I think it would be a marriage made in heaven.

      Ubuntu is really trying to innovate and change desktop paradigms. They're making serious in roads, and OEMs are willing to deal with Ubuntu.

      That being said they are too bleeding edge to be taken seriously in the server/enterprise department, they have poor QA, they treat KDE as a bastard stepchild, and they don't push enough code upstream.

      SUSE has great engineers, pushes tons of great code upstream, has a great server product, has good QA and puts out a great KDE desktop.

      You'd get the best of Ubuntu's package manager, and SUSE's fantastic Yast tools. Canonical would also pick up SUSE's SUSE Studio and the Open Build Service.

      I think you could capture the desktop market with Ubuntu's music store, cloud storage, etc. and the enterprise server market by leveraging Novell/SUSE's good name with SLED.

      Tell me you wouldn't want to run a desktop that merged the best features of Ubuntu and openSUSE.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    7. Re:Rebranding by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I don't know. Its a little dicey for me because Novell seems pro Gnome (Ximian) while Suse has strong KDE support going back to the start of the KDE. How strong is Suse's support in terms of inside KDE it used to be a big player 5 years ago. Does it still fund anything?

    8. Re:Rebranding by TheGoodNamesWereGone · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but count me among the ones who're not happy with 4.x. Eye candy is nice but the purpose of a desktop environment ought to be to enable the user to get his work done as quickly as possible. Do that, *then* add the gravy. KDE 4 is the best thing to ever happen to GNOME.

    9. Re:Rebranding by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      What part of KDE makes work harder to do?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    10. Re:Rebranding by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      That doesn't matter nearly as much as it did years ago, however given that Canonical would be the one making the purchase, I'm sure they'd stick with .deb

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    11. Re:Rebranding by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Its an interesting direction. It would allow Canonical to break from Debian. I just don't see how they pay for all that engineering without Novell's business interests.

      Take a look at the history for Novell's interests in something like Suse: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caldera_OpenLinux

    12. Re:Rebranding by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      With the appeal of a stable/respected SLES server product, and revenue streams from Ubuntu One/Ubuntu Music store, etc.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    13. Re:Rebranding by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Its an interesting idea. If in theory the two products are merged there is likely to be some synergies. SUSE gives Ubuntu the technical depth to do what they want on the desktop and Ubuntu gives a compelling reason to pick SLES over RHES.

      I like it!

  22. KDE is not going anywhere by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    I read that they were going to go through some re-branding pain some time ago although the reasons were not clear, at least to me. But I hardly think this qualifies as signs that KDE is going away.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  23. Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by ingwa · · Score: 4, Informative

    * KDE was rebranded a year ago. It's now the name of the community, not the desktop.
    * KDE, the community, is stronger than ever with more contributors than ever and more commits than ever.
    * Calligra does not switch focus to mobile, but it *extends* the focus to mobile... and tablets... and so on.

    1. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 1

      KDE was rebranded a year ago. It's now the name of the community, not the desktop.

      So what's KDE called now?

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    2. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Hmmm. I switched from KDE to LXDE as part of the Lightweight Ubuntu (lubuntu) distribution. It's more memory-friendly

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by Compaqt · · Score: 1

      >So what's KDE called now?

      Well, KDE calls it "KDE Plasma Desktop".

      Everyone else just calls it "KDE".

      Oh, and KDE isn't a product. It's a community. A thought. A feeling.

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    4. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by Anrego · · Score: 1, Troll

      Oh, and KDE isn't a product. It's a community. A thought. A feeling.

      A bad dream..

      I know I'm gonna get modded troll for this one.. but the whole plasma desktop thing is a nightmare, and probably will kill KDE (the desktop, the community, etc..). Not for the reasons the article mentions, that's just silliness. For the reason that it has gone from something relatively stable, mature, and well liked.. to a barely usable mess... and has stayed that way. Stuff that should work.. basic stuff.. fails horribly. We arn't talking minor bugs and lack of polish.. we are talking key features like.. the menu.. and desktop wallpaper. Plasma _still_ feels like pre-alpha software.

      I've recently switched to an interesting but very nice combination of openbox and xfce4-panel. It gives me most of what kde3 gave me, without the eye candy I generally disabled anyway. If anyone else is having the "omg how do I get kde3 back" feeling.. might give this off pair a try.

      And I know you always lose users when you make drastic changes.. but hatred ot plasma desktop and a strong desire to get kde3 back seems almost universal in my circle(s).

    5. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by walshy007 · · Score: 2

      you know, you can disable most of that stuff

      With my instance of kde all I really use is the task bar for switching between applications and the alt-f2 run command.

    6. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by jbolden · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the answer. I remember the announcement about the "Kool desktop environment" during the days of Caldera.

    7. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Then why bother? Fluxbox does that very fast and with a teensy footprint.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I downloaded and compiled most of the first Beta KDE releases on my ultra high-end Pentium Pro-powered Slackware system - upon which I also had to build X11 and figure out modelines to make my monitor work. /shakes fist at kids on lawn.

    9. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I never owned the Pentium pro. Went right from the 60mhz Pentiums to an MMX. Back when you are talking about I didn't see any reason for KDE. I loved WindowMaker:

      The window manager of a NeXT with software availability of SunOS and easy administration (at least comparatively)! Except for the buggyness, this Linux was already getting better than the expensive workstation Unixes, and you could solve the buggyness with some commercial packages.

      I was messing around with the early TeXs (which were amazing). So you got me there, I remember the announcement but didn't use KDE until I switched to Mandrake from RedHat.

    10. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any reason for WindowMaker; I already had (well, actually still have) a NeXT station. ;) Hooray for Universities which sold those at a near-reasonable price!

    11. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by kayoshiii · · Score: 1

      I think this applies to a certain part of the KDE community. I liked kde3 a lot but I like kde4 better. I don't particularly like the menu, the old menu is available just not the default. I like the desktop a lot better - I never was one for cluttering my desktop with icons. Currently I use a small amount of desktop space to view my work links folder. a task list applet and an applet for logging my hours at work. It looks and works great and I can use win + tab to switch to a different configuration if (when I am not working). You can switch to desktop activity to folderview if you prefer the old behaviour.

      Compositing is a major step forward for me especially in conjunction with screen corners. I use top left corner to switch applications, top right to switch virtual desktops and bottom left to get to the desktop. I cluster the links I want to use around this corner.

      My desktop looks and works better, runs plenty fast enough. I have some stability problems with dolphin but going back to kde3 is not something I could even imagine doing.

       

    12. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I do believe that's mate sir. Good game :-) I got to use NeXT in college and then Suns in grad school but never owned one. I was part of the "Linux gets me some of Solaris for no money" crowd. I can't imagine stepping down from a NeXT to a mid 1990s Linux. I would have figured you would have moved to an Indy/O2 or an Ultra if you were willing to pay workstation prices rather than dealing with the early day of KDE. If you could have CDE on the Ultra why have KDE?

    13. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by jbolden · · Score: 1

      A mark disappeared the first thing was supposed to be [Knocking over king]

    14. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by richlv · · Score: 1

      hi there. a longtime (since v2) kde user and supporter. i have a confession to make.
      fuck with the "it's now the name of the community". if you know anybody who calls kde "kde SC ! !!!" kick them for me, thanks. so far i haven't met anybody i would have to kick, which shows that most people - surprise - call the desktop environment that we mostly like/love... kde.

      --
      Rich
    15. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by A+Jew · · Score: 1

      To a certain extent, I agree. KDE's goals and future are breathtaking, but in terms of implementation not all the planned features have been implemented yet, and UIs are still being redesigned from scratch. I think of it as still being in development, but putting on a brave face on things by putting out the most usable and polished product they can manage under the circumstances. To me, KDE 4 won't be "ready" until all the major features have been fully implemented and integrated and the UI and interaction models stabilize. Nevertheless, I want to start using it ASAP, so I'll go for the first release I feel comfortable with, regardless of "readiness".

    16. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      It's not a competition, but I'll take a win if offered. :D

      I hate[d] NeXT's Unix implementation and NetInfo; the interface was the best part, but I'm a CLI and config file guy. And putting /sbin's binaries in /etc makes me cringe.

      Besides, source code and continuous innovation is cool; NeXT was honestly pretty stagnant - outside of the whole "graphical web browser was invented here" thing... ;)

    17. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by jbolden · · Score: 1

      I had mixed feelings about NetInfo. On the one hand I think it started to move things away from complex configuration files. On the other hand an undocumented database is worse than config files as the Windows registry shows. But I understand why people have mixed feelings.

      In terms of innovation I give them credit for inventing most of the concepts of an object oriented GUI, WebObjects the first application server, magneto-optical media and later the CD-ROM drive. That's in addition to major innovations in programming languages. Call me someone who drank the kool aide but I only wish we were seeing that much innovation today.

    18. Re:Indeed and it misses the point in so many ways by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1
      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  24. Re:Dear lord, no. by tverbeek · · Score: 1

    Not according to this blog post, linked from koffice.org: http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi/2010/12/07#kde_proud

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  25. Re:Kalligra by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    /dev/null ?

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  26. Re:Oblig ... by Enderandrew · · Score: 2

    What do you mean by that?

    KDE's default behavior is to have no icons on the desktop because they want to eliminate the behavior of storing files on the desktop. They wanted to eliminate clutter.

    I'm not sure why someone would assume they're pushing a messy desktop, unless you mean they support widgets or plasmoids. So does Mac OS X and Windows 7, both praised for their "clean" design. I don't use plasmoids on the desktop and don't care for them, but they're entirely optional. (I do have plasmoids docked in the panel, but that is another story).

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  27. Did anyone actually use KOffice? by ndogg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know I never have, and I use KDE quite a lot. I don't know anyone that has. It's usually OpenOffice.org that's being use.

    --
    // file: mice.h
    #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    1. Re:Did anyone actually use KOffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know I never have, and I use KDE quite a lot. I don't know anyone that has. It's usually OpenOffice.org that's being use.

      I've tried to use KOffice. Lord, how I've tried. I hate OpenOffice with a passion, but I just keep coming back to it.

      There's really only one thing holding KOffice back from general recognition as an Office contender: the font rendering/kerning is abysmal.

      The history behind this is tragic: someone in both the KDE and KOffice projects made it a principle that these projects should always use Qt libraries whenever possible instead of re-inventing the wheel. On paper, this sounds good. The problem is that there are still areas where the current Qt libraries....well, suck. Font rendering is one, printing is another. Thus, KOffice sucks and fonts and KDE sucks at printing (KDE3 was great at this because they used their own libraries).

      This is not usually a big deal because bugs can be fixed, right? Not in this case. The KDE and KOffice people point at the guiding principle (use Qt libraries) and say it's a Qt problem--ask Qt for a fix. The Qt people say that these features are not important to include in their libraries (because neither KDE nor KOffice are their bread and butter). And nobody fixes the problem.

      Actually that's not entirely true. The Scribus team created their own font rendering library for their Qt-based app. Because they don't want to produce crap, even if they have to re-invent the wheel to avoid producing crap.

    2. Re:Did anyone actually use KOffice? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I really like it (v2), but it is not anywhere approaching complete.

      I like the ribbonish toolbar in Kword a lot though.

      In Kspread there were stupid assinine things it wasn't doing for me in a spreadsheet (it was a while ago), so I switched over to OO.org. It (Kspread) was barely more viable than Google Docs IMO. This is ignoring the stability issues, and the hard press on European sizes.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    3. Re:Did anyone actually use KOffice? by hweimer · · Score: 1

      I know I never have, and I use KDE quite a lot. I don't know anyone that has. It's usually OpenOffice.org that's being use.

      It wasn't even a KDE project. Probably the authors just decided that it was time to switch directions of the project since it was not going anywhere.

      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
    4. Re:Did anyone actually use KOffice? by xiox · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you're correct. I tried KOffice as OpenOffice does suck in many ways, but when it couldn't render text properly on paper I had to give up.

    5. Re:Did anyone actually use KOffice? by m50d · · Score: 1

      I do. It's wonderful, it has all the features I need but takes about 1/3 the memory of OOo. Rather like using Konqueror rather than Firefox, or KMail rather than Evolution, or... you get the drift.

      --
      I am trolling
  28. Article was waste of time. by larppaxyz · · Score: 1

    KOffice was just stupid name.

  29. kaligraphy.com by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Hmm. And just recently I got a request to purchase kaligraphy.com from me.

    Thinking that it might have been Microsoft or Apple or similar about to release a new product, I replied with an outrageously high price. I wonder if it was the KDE team :)

    If it is indeed the KDE team, get in touch :) Email is in the whois data ...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:kaligraphy.com by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Cue a mail from kde@microsoft.com.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
  30. Re:Oblig ... by PhrstBrn · · Score: 1

    I couldn't get past the windowing themes. Everything had super-rounded corners and had a shiny chrome look, and the icon sets were ugly and sin. My window manager should get out of the way, not be distracting.

    I know I could theoretically customize it, but when I go under Google images for "KDE" every screenshot has the ugly as sin, distracting desktop icons and window borders. When I look at Google images for "Gnome desktop" ("gnome" brings up the garden variety), most of the screenshots use Clearlooks themes, while not the most attractive, it's not distracting.

  31. Re:Kalligra by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Funny

    we can add the iProducts to this trend too.

    Actually, iThink i'Ve heard complaints about all three.

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  32. Re:Kalligra by camperdave · · Score: 1

    It bothered me to no end. Why are you even writing software that is tied to a desktop environment in the first place?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  33. Re:Kalligra by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It makes for horrible alphabetical clustering in menus and file managers!

    I can't find anything at a glance, among K* or i* - or g[????]*.

    Just as bad - if not worse is the sorting on Windows machines "My" everything and "Microsoft" everything. Real visual cluster fart.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  34. Re:Kalligra by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Kan't you see kreating names like that kan only lead to some people thinking that the projekt is not kommercial quality?

    No joke - I've read comments in the past where people said they don't consider KDE suitable for business use because of the k-naming convention. Personally, I actually like it for one reason: it groups most of the KDE projects together in package managers.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  35. Re:Kalligra by Hatta · · Score: 4, Funny

    iThink iHave an iDea.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  36. Re:Kalligra by Enderandrew · · Score: 2

    You can use Amarok just fine in Gnome. It isn't "tied" to the desktop. However, running an all-Gnome or all-KDE ecosystem means you reuse the same libraries, keep a consistent look, and share certain features, such as KDE ioslaves, Akonadi resources, Strigi/Nepomuk metadata, same file dialogs, etc. across all the apps.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  37. Re:Kalligra by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 2

    Better integration, for one. You know what is and isn't there, you can style it to fit in with the rest of the environment, etc. Plus choosing Qt or GTK can mean your app looks funny in one environment (it doesn't have to though).

    --
    SSC
  38. Wow! Total junk news by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is a horrible junk news editorial. This speculation is not just wild, it is more annoying than those toads in Australia... too much of this around and we just can't kill them all.

    I welcome the name change from KOffice to just about anything else including Caligula. KOffice is not the same as K-Office. KOffice sounds too much like a bronchial condition. And the propensity to name things with a K in front is just ridiculous. I know, Gnome is somewhat guilty of that but not to the same extent. Worse, K is associated n my mind with K-Mart which was the brand of K-rap. (Their shoes were cheap and only lasted for 5 minutes on my feet when I was a kid.) I know... my association with K is my problem, but still. Too much K already. At least "G" is more often silent.

  39. Re:Kalligra by moonbender · · Score: 1

    Because you're probably using either GTK or Qt anyway, so you might as well go the last mile and integrate well with the corresponding DE.

    On a sidenote regarding desktop integration, I was amazed recently when I wanted to send a friend an audio file (some old amiga module) and I could simply draw it from the Banshee playlist into his Pidgin chat window. I could scarcely believe my eyes.

    --
    Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
  40. Re:Oblig ... by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    I feel your pain; I can't stand rounded borders on windows or buttons, and so far haven't found a single theme that uses plain-jane boxes to draw, er... boxes. Guess we're two of those weird people who apparently can't see the point in round things when they're not needed. And to my eyes, they're ugly.

    And yes, the default look of 80% of the themes looking like they've just emerged from a Turtle Wax avalanche doesn't help either. It took me forever to figure out how to get rid of the damned image overlay on the taskbar, which distracted me no end when I was reading it. To my eye these themes don't look polished, to me they're so self-consciously crying out for attention that they begins to take on the look of a teenager trying to be cool by growing a wispy bumfluff moustache and smoking a woodbine he purloined from his grandmother whilst bragging to the girls about how he's totally going to get some bitchin' rims for the Ford Fiesta his mum will donate to him once he hits 17.

    At the end of the day, I still use KDE because it sucks less than GNOME and XFCE. But at least in windows I can use square window borders that eat up next to no screen real estate (although it's taken me no end of reg hacking to get win7 explorer to behave how I want it to). Seems to me like most developments in the UI world over the last five years have been directed towards making the desktop more blingy and less application oriented, whilst gobbling up more screen real estate, especially vertical... despite the fact that dot pitch and vertical resolution has been dropping over the last couple of years (thanks to the almost total exclusion of TFT panels that aren't 720p or 1080p - god knows how anyone can find a 15" screen with 1368x768 acceptable), to the extent we now have to have special "netbook" editions of UI's so that we can still fit in the huge blingin' icons. That's progress! /screaming old fuddy-duddy, apparently

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  41. Re:Kalligra by JackieBrown · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is some more background on the split

    http://lists.kde.org/?l=koffice-devel&m=128782551919625&w=2

  42. Re:Kalligra by Tr3vin · · Score: 1

    By their descriptions. As a guy who hasn't used KDE, I can't even tell you what Plasma and Dolphin are for. Package managers are wonderful things.

  43. what is in a name? by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

    Could be worse. could have been named for the son of Marcus Aurelius: Comodeus

    --
    - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
  44. I would so use that.... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Caligula Text editor? I am so there!

    How about other cool names? I want the Loki Operating system!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  45. If only there was a way to find out! by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Never ask a question inspired by itworld that can be answered by simply going straight to the source.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
  46. Re:Oblig ... by Amorya · · Score: 1

    Guess we're two of those weird people who apparently can't see the point in round things when they're not needed.

    Oh, but they're everywhere!

  47. Paypal alternatives by Compaqt · · Score: 1

    >Btw, what alternatives are there to paypal?

    http://gunpal.com/ (I kid you not.)
    http://alertpay.com/
    wire transfers
    http://moneybookers.com/
    https://www.neteller.com/
    https://www.epassporte.com/
    http://www.e-gold.com/
    http://www.libertyreserve.com/

    >You know, companies that atleast pretend to support democracy.

    I don't vouch for any of the above.

    --
    I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
  48. Re:Kalligra by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    KDE does not sort by company name like windows does. Everything is sorted by category. In fact, KDE defaults to sort the apps in the submenus by product description instead of name.

  49. Re:Wow! Total junk news by houghi · · Score: 1

    G is so silent, many people are not even it exists.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  50. Re:Kalligra by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    With several K items in each Kategory.

    Oh, Krap...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  51. Re:Kalligra by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    No, Rekonq would be sorted under W for Web Browser. The menu entry would say:

    Rekonq
    Web Browser

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  52. Nothing to see here by Rysc · · Score: 1

    What happened here seems to be, from my skimming of the mailing lists, just a personality conflict. A bog-standard one, at that. The name change is more symbolic than anything else. Here's what to take away from this fiasco: One KWord developer is going to do his own thing, where some lists and code repos are hosted may change. Everything else is business as usual.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  53. Re:Kalligra by ByOhTek · · Score: 1

    That's actually just the way the companies do it, not Windows, as Windows only predetermines where apps bundled with windows should go. I usually rearrange my start menu from
        program -> company -> app
    to
        program -> category -> app

    Anyway, it doesn't change the issue, that under any given category in a the system KDE/Gnome menu, there usually ends up being a bunch of clustered 'K' apps and 'G' apps, particularly the games section

    --
    Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
  54. Re:Kalligra by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Still Krappy. I run "k-apps" from a Gnome or XFCE desktop. The assumption of conforming to KDE menu metadata is a false one, which obfuscates the error of naming for certain users, but breaks down in other environments - such as the Konsole. :-)

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  55. What is koffice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This makes no sense to me....maybe should lable this as nonsense?!?

    At this time I use nothing but KDE....and I hope to never change. But what is koffice? I have never seen nor used this. So far just have Open Office....though not sure of the future of that suite of applications since Oracle has taken over Sun. How can the change of a name for one app. or suite of apps kill the parent environment? I do not see the relationship here. KDE is a desktop environment and I should think any one app./suite should not be central. Certainly koffice does exist but even if it were to disappear I think (to me) I would not even notice and have no effect on my installing and using KDE. /fennix

  56. Re:Kalligra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Twilight SeaQuest crossover fanfics?

  57. Re:Kalligra by camperdave · · Score: 1

    Don't Gnome, XFCE, et al also have ioslaves, Akonadi resources, Strigi/Nepomuk metadata, file dialogs, etc? Desktop environments all provide a consistent set of functions and widgits for application developers, don't they?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  58. Re:Kalligra by jbolden · · Score: 1

    I can't mod you up but thanks for the useful link.

  59. Re:Kalligra by jbolden · · Score: 5, Informative

    As I'm reading this thread I'd suggest this link instead:
    http://lists.kde.org/?l=koffice-devel&m=128812911619277&w=2

  60. Better question... by Rob+Y. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How am I supposed to know Plasma and Dolphin are KDE apps now?

    Here's a better question. Why should I need to know whether Dolphin (I'll leave out Plasma, since it's functionality is so KDE-specific) is a KDE app? If I like it, I should be able to use it seamlessly regardless of which DE I prefer. To the extent that I can't, the 'open desktop' has failed. To the extent that it's becoming easier and easier, the OD is inching (not fast enough, IMHO) toward (the potential for) success.

    --
    Posted from my Android phone. Oh, I can change this? There, that's better...
    1. Re:Better question... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

      Why should I need to know whether Dolphin is a KDE app? If I like it, I should be able to use it seamlessly regardless of which DE I prefer. To the extent that I can't, the 'open desktop' has failed.

      Why? Dolphin is also pretty tied into KDE. You don't normally expect to be able to use one environment's file manager in another environment.

      Think of Gnome and KDE as different platforms built on different technologies. They are infinitely better than most at running each others' applications. You don't hear people saying things like "Microsoft and Apple have failed because I can't run Windows Explorer seamlessly on OS X".

      The integration problems are programs like OpenOffice.org that never seem to work quite right in any environment. That is an impediment to the adoption of free operating systems on the desktop.

    2. Re:Better question... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Why should I need to know whether Dolphin (I'll leave out Plasma, since it's functionality is so KDE-specific) is a KDE app?

      It's not so much that you need to know that it is with KDE, but what it does at all! Why didn't they go with the Navigator/Explorer/Safari theme? And let's not get into "Calligra"... MS uses "Word", Apple uses "Pages" - I mean, what the hell? Why are all of their apps named like club drugs?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  61. Re:Kalligra by jbolden · · Score: 1

    To get features of the libraries and tight integration. Best of breed office suites (like WordPerfect's) lost to integrated suites (like Microsoft's) because of the advantages the offered for things like cut and paste of objects working across apps.

  62. Re:The end, my friend. by jbolden · · Score: 1

    They are having a rough couple of years. OTOH Meego could be as important as Suse, Turbo, Caldera was in the early years. KDE and Linux in general is having a tough time refocusing. We'll see how this plays out. Microsoft, with the exception of XBOX has had lots of trouble expanding and is somewhat losing ground. I don't see them being as dominant on handheld office suites of say 2015.

  63. Re:Kalligra by Carewolf · · Score: 2

    No and yes. XFCE has none of those things. It is not a desktop/widget set like KDE and GNOME, and GNOME doesn't have akonadi resources, or ioslaves, because they refuse to use frameworks written in C++ and especially any framework written by anyone that has ever had anything to do with KDE. In stead they have different frameworks like Gnome-VFS, GStreamer or GTK file-dialogs, that sometimes does the same thing as KDE equivalents, and sometimes does something different

  64. Re:Oblig ... by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

    I just use ion3 under KDE. No floating windows at all, and certainly no rounded corners. It's as easy as setting KDEWM=/usr/bin/ion3 (I add it in $HOME/.kde/env).

    I am moving to a new laptop, and I'm setting it up with i3, which is a nice replacement for ex-ion3 folk who like static tiling window managers with tabs in the frames. Both work fine with KDE, nice and easy, plasmoids run in tiles (if you like them; I personally don't), and everything is fine.

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  65. Re:Does it really matter any longer? by jbolden · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RedHat helped found Gnome in reaction to KDE when it first came out. They were always hostile as opposed to Caldera which was very pro-KDE.
    Ubuntu was always part of Gnome, they had to pick and they picked Gnome because they agreed with the goal of interface simplicity which was part of the Gnome 2 project.

    The real kick in the teeth was Suse and Mandriva/Mandrake supporting Gnome fully.

  66. Re:Kalligra by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    For example, with Akonadi you can have a resource that is your address book.

    Fire up your email client, and it is there. Fire up a VOIP client, and it is there. Fire up a calendar, and it is there. Fire up an IM client, and it is there. They can all share the same resource if they're all KDE apps designed to work with Akonadi resources.

    I *believe* the KDE devs tried getting Akonadi turned into a Free Desktop standard that Gnome used as well, but it was denied. Maybe I'm crazy and thinking of something else though.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  67. Re:Kalligra by camperdave · · Score: 1

    I *believe* the KDE devs tried getting Akonadi turned into a Free Desktop standard that Gnome used as well, but it was denied.

    So what you're saying is that there is a cross platform desktop standard but nobody is using it?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  68. Re:Kalligra by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    There are cross platform desktop standards at FreeDesktop.org

    For instance, the naming conventions for icons in KDE 3 and Gnome were different, so you couldn't share an icon set. A FreeDesktop.org standard was set, and they both use it now. There are standards for menu entries, etc.

    The KDE devs did try to get Akonadi recognized as a standard so resources (like an address book) would be recognized in Gnome applications as well. FreeDesktop.org did not accept it as a standard.

    http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-pim&m=118583299200650&w=2

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  69. Re:Does it really matter any longer? by mauriceh · · Score: 1

    True, and more and more, we see that without the big names like Red Hat, Oracle, Ubuntu, etc. paying developers to code this,it is not easy for a project like this to progress effectively.
    However, we shall see what transpires with Libre Office.. If Oracle manage to muck that transition up, perhaps there is still a place for K Apps.

    --
    Maurice W. Hilarius Voice: (778) 347-9907
  70. Re:Klan meeting? by froggymana · · Score: 1

    No wonder why everyone sees the linux community as a bunch of evil nerds up to no good.

    --
    "To prevent this day from getting any worse, I'll just read ERROR as GOOD THING" 1GJU8xLuDKDxEs4KLf8fAGyptoDsqvEsBT
  71. Re:Kalligra by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    How am I supposed to know Plasma and Dolphin are KDE apps now?

    ldd /usr/bin/dolphin | grep kde
    HTH

  72. Re:Kalligra by cp.tar · · Score: 1

    we can add the iProducts to this trend too.

    Actually, iThink i'Ve heard complaints about all three.

    I suggest we call all that iGunK.

    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  73. Re:Kalligra by mehemiah · · Score: 1

    it still suprises me sometimes when sarcasim escapes people sometimes

  74. Re:Does it really matter any longer? by jbolden · · Score: 1

    I don't see Open Office dying in their space. I like the direction KDE is moving in of having Koffice go downscale to the mobile / tablet market. OpenOffice is very very heavy.

  75. Re:Kalligra by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    Thankfully in the console it is straightforward to set up an interface that suits you with trivial symlinks or aliases. No faffing around with endless abstraction layers, complex configuration GUIs, or overcomplicated and largely undocumented crap like GConf.

  76. Re:Kalligra by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

    Also, KDE veteran Aaron Seigo wrote a blog entry about the split.

  77. Re:Kalligra by DMiax · · Score: 1

    That post is bullshit. It calls fork what is not (only the head developer and a few others of kword stays in "the root", all the rest go to "the branch") and says that Calligra will not be associated with KDE (false, they use kdelibs and the same repos, sites bugzilla...). Basically it is one last desperate attempt to gain support by a guy that pushed away a majority of developers and split the community.

  78. Re:Kalligra by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

    That must be your distro. That isn't the KDE default.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  79. Re:Oblig ... by MrNemesis · · Score: 1

    Had tried QtCurve and liked it (being one of the few saner themes by default out there), but had managed to miss that option. Thanks!

    --
    Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
  80. Re:Kalligra by jbolden · · Score: 1

    OK I don't have any personal information. I stand corrected, what was the split really about? Where there any technical or vision issues?

  81. Re:Kalligra by Mystra_x64 · · Score: 2

    Too bad f.d.o. tends to auto approve Gnome things as 'standard' without second though.

    --
    Quick way to get 30% Funny 70% Troll: defend Opera browser on /.
  82. Re:Does it really matter any longer? by PeterBrett · · Score: 1

    After the past 2 years of endless unstable and uselessly incomplete releases, who the heck uses KDE any more?

    Me. It's a genuinely excellent desktop environment with far more polish, user-friendliness and power than GNOME. And I can't recall a "unstable and uselessly incomplete" release in the last 18 months, so yeah, your post is indeed "Flamebait".

  83. Re:Kalligra by juhaz · · Score: 1

    The KDE devs did try to get Akonadi recognized as a standard so resources (like an address book) would be recognized in Gnome applications as well. FreeDesktop.org did not accept it as a standard.

    http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-pim&m=118583299200650&w=2

    No, they didn't. There isn't such a proposal anywhere on the XDG lists.

    Based on that thread, it looks like they talked about it themselves and then decided it won't be accepted without even actually trying, or that there would be too much hassle.

  84. Re:Kalligra by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    Apple presents iFarted: Stink Different.

  85. Re:Does it really matter any longer? by Lanteran · · Score: 1

    I do, KDE 3.5 Trinity to be precise. It's an excellent DE; though you don't discount that, you seem to be flaming KDE 4.

    --
    "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  86. In short by k1773re7f · · Score: 1

    no

    --
    This sig. intentionally left blank.
  87. Really? by DeadRat4life · · Score: 1

    Will people stop using KDE because Koffice changed its name from a pretty lame name that probably shouldn't have been used in the first place? Is that what your asking here? really? Or, will KDE change its name? Maybe? But does a project changing its name, probably to draw in more Gnome users, really point in that direction?