Slashdot Mirror


China Blocks News Websites In Protest of Nobel

DaveNJ1987 writes "The Chinese Government has blocked the websites of the BBC, CNN and Norwegian public service broadcaster NRK, less than 24 hours before dissident Chinese writer Liu Xiaobo is due to be awarded the Nobel peace prize. China has been vocally critical of the plans to award the jailed writer the prize and has even gone as far as setting up its own 'Confucius peace prize' to rival the awards being held in Oslo tomorrow."

213 comments

  1. No appreciation for subtlety in China by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stop being so heavy-handed and obvious. Take a page from the CIA playbook. If you *really* want to discredit Liu Xiaobo, just recruit a couple of women to say he raped them (or some kids to say he molested them, or an old lady to say he beat her, something along those lines). Easy, subtle, and no need to censor CNN. And what's really great is that it works even if he's in another country (if you can recruit locals there, even better!). Pretty soon the Nobel people are backing away from him, Visa won't process donations for his cause, everybody is calling him a rapist/child-molester/wife-beater. And you get to say "Hey, wasn't us, that's his own personal problems" if anyone asks. Now no one will touch him and you didn't have to *directly* come down on anyone.

    Just make sure your recruits look credible and pay them/threaten them enough to make sure they never talk.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Of course, make sure they weren't bragging online about having sex with him days after the alleged "rape".

    2. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by pitchpipe · · Score: 2

      China Blocks News Websites In Protest of Nobel

      Why is the Man alway trying to hold China down?! Give them a break. They're just exercising their right to free speech. Oh wait...

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    3. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Krneki · · Score: 1

      You forgot about uploading pedophile photos on his PC. think of the children!

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    4. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 0

      If you *really* want to discredit Liu Xiaobo, just recruit a couple of women to say he raped them

      So easy. Is anyone even remotely willing to acknowledge the slightest possibility that Assange may be, in fact, a scumbag, and that raping women is just something that scumbags do?

    5. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Sure. Could just be that he spent 39 years not being a rapist only to begin his rapist career a couple of weeks after releasing a huge stash of classified materials that embarrassed the most powerful government in the world.

      Of course, Liu Xiaobo could have spent 54 years not being caught for molesting children, only to have his victims finally come forward around the same time he is to accept the Nobel Prize. No need for any conspiracy theories here. Maybe we should consider that he really *is* a child molester, and the timing is just coincidental.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Is anyone even remotely willing to acknowledge the slightest possibility that Assange may be, in fact, a scumbag, and that raping women is just something that scumbags do?

      I'm willing to acknowledge the possibility ... but, these allegations, er, allegedly came about after the two women met up with one another and realized they'd both had unprotected sex with him and wanted him to get tested for STDs. The women (again, allegedly) didn't want him prosecuted.

      I seriously question if Interpol and the whole world would have been notified of this if this was anybody else.

      Are you willing to accept that the whole thing has escalated beyond a point that would have happened under any other circumstances and that this wasn't rape?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1

      Are you willing to accept that the whole thing has escalated beyond a point that would have happened under any other circumstances and that this wasn't rape?

      I'm willing to acknowledge the possibility, yes. It's just interesting to me that people are willing to accept their own interpretations of events as fact. Assange could have shot three policemen unprovoked in broad daylight and people would still scream character assassination.

    8. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He is arguably a scumbag. But going from scumbag to rapist is a pretty big step. And considering the actual allegations? It is disrespectful to actual rape victims.

    9. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      I'm willing to acknowledge the possibility, yes. It's just interesting to me that people are willing to accept their own interpretations of events as fact.

      Huh? I've read probably 30 or 40 news stories trying to sift through what is being said by various sources on this one to try to get a handle on what is being reported. I'm not just sitting around saying "Oh, he did/didn't rape those women because that's what I want to believe".

      I don't think the allegations are character assassination -- I think the women legitimately did go to police, I just don't think the scale of the response of involving Interpol matches what would be happening for anybody else. I do question the underlying reasons for that. You don't call Interpol because someone wants someone they slept with to have an STD test.

      Some people will always cry conspiracy theory. And, equally, some people will always say that if the allegations have been made, they must be true. I don't agree with either standpoint.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    10. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1

      Sure. Could just be that he spent 39 years not being a rapist only to begin his rapist career a couple of weeks after releasing a huge stash of classified materials that embarrassed the most powerful government in the world.

      It could be, yes. Power does go to people's heads, after all. Did you know 70% of all rapes go unreported? Could just be the first time someone spoke up.

      Of course, Liu Xiaobo could have spent 54 years not being caught for molesting children, only to have his victims finally come forward around the same time he is to accept the Nobel Prize.

      I'm sure as far as you're concerned, China and the US are on the same level as far as governance go, despite the very documents that Assange is leaking providing overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

    11. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by commodore64_love · · Score: 2

      This world's governments are going down the tube with their anti-free speech practices. And a lot of them are copying China as if that was the ideal model

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      Sure, except I've heard many of the details on NPR and no one is accusing him of what we, in the US at least, call rape. There was no non-consensual sex. No woman is pressing any charges. A politician has charged him with having sex without a condom. The local government is only aware of the issue because 2 women were trying to track him down to have him tested for STDs, but he stayed off the grid to avoid governments tracking him.

      Stupid? Yes. Scumbag? No.

    13. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Tom · · Score: 1

      So easy. Is anyone even remotely willing to acknowledge the slightest possibility that Assange may be, in fact, a scumbag, and that raping women is just something that scumbags do?

      Yepp.

      As a remote, slight possibility.

      So far, what info I could find about the events and the women in question make it a lot more likely that two women learn their treasure fuck has also had someone else around the same time, and it's surprisingly common in those cases for the two "cheated" women to band together against the guy and get some revenge. I think anyone with a somewhat interesting sex history has seen it happen.

      Rape victims that twitter their rape experience as a great night the day after are... well... a little less common.

      So until new evidence arises, my take is that it could have been a rape, but the chances are slight indeed.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    14. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 0

      Some people will always cry conspiracy theory. And, equally, some people will always say that if the allegations have been made, they must be true. I don't agree with either standpoint.

      Hence my italicizing of the word "possibility." And by "some people" I didn't mean you in particular.

    15. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought the problem was that there was no scumbag. Or that it broke.

    16. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Did you know 70% of all rapes go unreported?

      And that’s definitely not a made-up statistic. At all. By any stretch of the imagination.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    17. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      I imagine that if I were a Chinese citizen, and some of the big foreign news websites were all-of-a-sudden firewalled, I would be extremely suspicious that negative press about China was just about to come out. That would motivate me to look harder for the information that is being blocked.

    18. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1
    19. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by HertzaHaeon · · Score: 1

      By your conspiratory logic, if you're Liu Xiaobo and want to get away with rape, it's pretty easy. Just blame it all on the Chinese government afterwards.

    20. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      FACTS:
      Sexual violence remains the most dramatically under reported crime, with an estimated two-thirds of attacks unreported ... over 70% of all rapes go unreported

      FACT: That was a made-up statistic.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    21. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by atheos · · Score: 1

      won't matter, that kind of information never reaches the MSM

    22. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by moondawg14 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      If you were a Chinese citizen, you'd be so used to the idea, it wouldn't even make you flinch. I visited China during the run up to the 2008 Olympics. I was watching CNN international. The reporter started talking about China's "increased tranpsarency to the press" or whatever term they were using then. The screen went black for about 2 minutes. When the picture came back, the reporter was done. This happened several times over the 2 weeks I was there. I was dumbfounded. It's just a way of life. The Chinese just shrug their shoulders and go on.

    23. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      And how did they compile that statistic? For it to be accurate, you'd need every rape to be reported to the rape statistic collectors, and some proportion of those to be reported to the police. It's also interesting that you cite The Women's Center for the statistic, since the police statistics in the UK showed that rapes of men are less likely to be reported than rapes of women (admitting to having been raped is a lot more damaging to the male ego, apparently).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    24. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Indeed, he might have used them, but I haven't seen any credible reports to back the idea that it was even sexual assault. And the original prosecutor seemed to agree seeing as he didn't even bother to interview Assange when offered.

      I did see reports that one of the women is a radical feminist, not sure what part, if any, that might have played in this whole thing. Radical feminists aren't exactly world renowned for their belief in fair play when it comes to men. It wouldn't surprise me at all if she wasn't using him for her own political gain separate from this whole Wikileaks thing.

    25. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Generally, when I'm trying to stay off the grid to avoid the police, I don't retain an attorney and offer to come in for questioning. But, hey, that's just me, he may have discovered a new way to go incognito.

    26. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is anyone even remotely willing to acknowledge the slightest possibility that Assange may be, in fact, a scumbag, and that raping women is just something that scumbags do?

      I was remotely willing to acknowledge the slightest possibility, but then it turned out that the sex was consensual and the prosecutors keep changing their justification for the women retroactively withdrawing their consent, since after the first version of the story got out ("He was seeing someone on the side") it turned out both women knew each other and their relationships. Now it's "the condom fell off" or whatever the reason du jour.

    27. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by butalearner · · Score: 1

      Since "rape" was actually "consensual but unprotected sex," they just need to come up with a more frightening name than "inciting subversion of state power." Call him a terrorist and they'll have half the U.S. on their side.

    28. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's put it that way, a LOT of things point towards this being a plot rather than him being a scumbag.

      1. The accusations happen only a few days after his organization starts publishing secret documents that quite a few countries (or rather, the governments of a few countries) would love to see disappear.
      2. The accusations are from a woman affiliated with the CIA.
      3. She first bragged about her night with Assange on her twitter page, then desperately tried to erase it when she suddenly decided it was rape.
      4. Swedish authorities did not want to talk with him while he was still in Sweden, even though he offered repeatedly to come willingly on his own for questioning.
      5. Suddenly when he left Sweden, an international arrest warrant was issued, nearly instantly. This must have been the fastest IAW in history over a kinda-sorta-serious allegation of maybe-rape. For varying degrees of rape, since I know no country aside of Sweden where fucking without a condom can be considered rape. Sidenote: Usually, if you try to get an IAW for something that is not a crime in at least most of the countries involved, don't bother trying. You won't get one. No chance, no way.

      The whole "rape" charge hinges on two feminists who fucked with Assange, not knowing that the other one fucked him too, then both got pissed when they found out that he fucked both of them and retaliated by calling it rape. Usually, as soon as a state attorney gets wind of such a "two dumped bitches" gambit, he drops the case faster than Assange dropped the bitches. Because he knows that any lawyer worth his salt will whack him left and right if he dares to pull something like this to court. But suddenly this is worth getting an international arrest warrant.

      In case someone here does not know the hassle normally involved in getting an IAW: It took me and our state law enforcement agency two weeks and a LOT of convincing paperwork to get a IAW for a person who we could PROVE was involved in fraud, extortion and blackmail, with a damage exceeding a million Euros. And here an IAW is suddenly pulled out of someone's ass for a kinda-sorta allegation of rape.

      Sorry, but believing that this is "real" gets harder by the nanosecond.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    29. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And how did they compile that statistic?

      With all of the ridiculousness of how they decide that someone’s been raped, it’s not at all hard to believe. If you’re a woman and you get drunk and have sex with a drunk dude, you’ve been raped! If you’re a man and you get drunk and have sex with a drunk chick, you’re a rapist! The fact that neither of them feels like they were raped or a rapist (not to mention the double standard) is irrelevant... and they need to be re-educated to “properly” perceive what happened so that they can “deal with it”. Or something like that.

      It never occurs to these people that maybe having drunk sex doesn’t scar you emotionally like actual rape does and that people don’t need to “deal with it”.

      They make mountains out of molehills ... just because they think people need to climb a mountain to get over it. Oh, and it might also be partly because they make money by helping people climb mountains.

      And don’t for a minute think that I’m trivializing real rape. They are doing that.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    30. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's a power I fear there. So scared it can't even give its citizens the news.

      China is acting like Obama.

    31. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by sstamps · · Score: 1

      Sure, anything is possible. However, the (literally endless) possibilities of what happened are not subject to debate. What is probable IS subject to debate.

      Then it simply comes down to what is more probable. Is it more probable that Assange is a scumbag that committed a sex crime, or that the supposed victims are scumbags trying to take him down for whatever reason? Only an objective look at some of the facts surrounding the case is going to lend probability to either theory.

      1) What is Assange's criminal background? Does anything in his history indicate a pattern of abuse? People don't just become rapists overnight; usually, there are a number of factors
      2) What, specifically, is he accused of? Is the law itself sound and reasonable? "Sex by surprise" and "unexpected sex" sound pretty strange, especially since they are differentiated from "rape" by Swedish law.
      3) Why would Assange, who was forewarned of the potential to be ensnared by some kind of sex (or other) scandal, blithely exhibit such behavior?
      4) What motivations would the women have to bear false witness? Quite a few, actually. Fame/notoriety chief among them. Were they indeed recruited to do so, or did they have their own axe to grind with Assange?
      5) Did the women, as reported, brag about their "conquest" of bedding Assange after-the-fact?

      The "seeking to obtain/exercise power over another" excuse can work both ways.

      As it stands, Assange has a LOT more to lose than both of those women, and they have/had everything to gain, no matter which way it goes. As such, I think the probability that this is some kind of fabricated smear (for whatever reason) is significantly higher than the probability that Assange is a closet sex predator who lost his mind in some kind of "mad power rush".

      --
      -SS "Teach the ignorant, care for the dumb, and punish the stupid."
    32. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by truthsearch · · Score: 1

      If he truly feels threatened, he only has two options to avoid retaliation from governments: hiding or publicity. Now that he's getting so much attention it's probably safer to stay in jail while the lawyers fight over extradition.

    33. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I knew a guy that used to brag about how he got girls drunk (usually girls that were dating his friends and felt safe with him) and would tag team them with his buddies. He was never reported by any of them woman. He made sure to make the experience so degrading they would never want it to be public.

      Rape does not have to be violent to be scarring.

      I make it a point (well I did when I was single) to never sleep with a girl that needed to be drunk in order to have sex. I know better than to set myself up and you never really know how much the drink is honestly effecting them.

    34. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      I think an even stronger illustration of the situation in China is the recent statement in the Western media Wen Jiabao himself made about how important a free press was in a civilized society (or like that, I'm paraphrasing, I don't recall the exact quote), and Chinese news services suppressed THAT. And we're talking the premier for the entire country here.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    35. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by poly_pusher · · Score: 1

      Dick Cheney is that you? I didn't know you were on Slashdot...

    36. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Ossifer · · Score: 1

      When will the powers that be ever learn the Streisand Effect?

      The smartest thing China could've done is to have silently ignored the whole thing.

    37. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      I don’t doubt that douchebags like that exist or that the experience is emotionally damaging. I just can’t stand the way things which were obviously neither rape nor emotionally damaging are placed on that same level as if they were.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    38. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by capo_dei_capi · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most Chinese citizens care neither about CNN, nor BBC, nor NRK.

    39. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's true... just here for business, and have 10 ways around it, but interesting nonetheless....

      $ telnet news.bbc.co.uk 80
      Trying 212.58.246.82...
      Connected to newswww.bbc.net.uk.
      Escape character is '^]'.
      Connection closed by foreign host.

    40. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by S.O.B. · · Score: 1

      Did you know 70% of all rapes go unreported? Could just be the first time someone spoke up.

      Since unreported rapes are UNREPORTED there is no scientific way to know what the actual percentage is so I'll say it's 10%. Just as valid as your 70%.

      I also hear 50 of all murders, 80% of all thefts and 99% of all Justin Bieber bashing go unreported.

      FYI, he is charged with "consensual, unprotected sex", he allegedly refused to wear a condom, which may be illegal in Sweden which has the strictest sexual assault laws but wouldn't even get past the sniff test in most other countries let alone justify an INTERPOL man hunt. Roman Polanski admitted to drugging and sodomizing an underage girl and even he didn't get this kind of attention.

      Lets see how the case turns out before we string him up.

      --
      Some of what I say is fact, some is conjecture, the rest I'm just blowing out my ass...you guess.
    41. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      See China, that's exactly what people will say when he denies molesting those kids.

      Paying attention?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    42. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by guspasho · · Score: 1

      Sounds similar to another country I'm familiar with.

    43. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      1) Whatever his background, Assange apparently seems unversed with the social conventions surrounding the one-night stand. But then again, neither is most of slashdot.
      2) I, um, heard on slashdot that the particular Swedish law violated is about sex without a condom during their morning intercourse. But reportedly there was a condom that broke.
      3) Because Anna Ardin is one hot forskningsassistent (actual job title). If all I have to do to get some attention from the likes of her is to embarrass the US, WHERE DO I SIGN UP?!
      4) Anna Ardin wrote some paper on how to enact sexual revenge, so it was probably a good way to exercise her thesis. And that kind of thing probably looks good in a CIA dossier as well.
      5) Supposedly she had some twitter tweets that she deleted after the fact.
      http://www.opednews.com/articles/Dissecting-Anna-Ardin-s-Ca-by-Press-Release-101208-16.html

      There was a *lot* more information out about the circumstances the first time this was reported. Now all the articles I find have everything filtered out... down to the names of the victims (Ms. "A" and Ms. "W"). Before there were a lot of details being reported on things like how she paid for Julians train fare to / from her flat, how they made love at night and again the following morning, and then she cooked breakfast for him, etc. etc. that didn't make for a very convincing case. It's almost as if they decided to drop the charges for a few months and wait for the facts to subside and fade from memory before they can bring it up again and hit him with a pretty dull cut & dried "rape" case devoid of any of those sorts of considerations. InfoOps at its finest, I suppose.

      Coincidentally rape and sexual crimes are also higher on the Swedish public radar nowadays, thanks to the "Girl with the Dragon Tatoo" book / movie trilogy that got big there (and internationally) over the past few years. Yay, vengeance.

    44. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Is anyone even remotely willing to acknowledge the slightest possibility that Assange may be, in fact, a scumbag, and that raping women is just something that scumbags do?

      You don't have to be a rapist to be a scumbag.

    45. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Did you know 70% of all rapes go unreported?

      No, and neither do you. You can't quantify undocumented phenomena. You can't know how much money is spent on illegal drugs, you can't know how much money is lost to undiscovered larceny, you can't know how many hookers there are in Detroit, you can't know how many illegal handguns there are in Chicago. Any numbers you see about any of these activities is pure and utter bullshit. You, sir, seem to be incredibly naive.

    46. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      You forgot that he's (according to the CBS evening propaganda) a "master hacker & head of a shadowy organization" or something very like that.
      Ooooo, sounds menacing, I guess that's why the rabid dogs on Fox news want him "assassinated"!

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    47. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

      America has a different approach entirely, jut don't report anything controversial of that might upset the advertisers, in short just report stuff that makes people feel good about things (leave the real reporting to the local stations).

      --
      I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
    48. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by yuje · · Score: 1

      If they wanted to be more subtle about it while also taking a jab at the United States, they should have awarded their new Confucius Peace Prize to Julian Assange.

    49. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by orient · · Score: 1

      At least China has the guts to do it openly. The American way looks more like a woman poisoning a rival.

      --
      Laudele lor desigur m-ar mahni peste masura.
    50. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by operagost · · Score: 1

      Actually, I hear the same guy who set up Assange asked the Chinese to protest this guy's Peace Prize. I hear it's because he didn't win again this year. Why does the Nobel committee hate black people?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    51. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by drunken-yeti · · Score: 0

      and since all of our coprorations love China, and everything that we use is made in China....

    52. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "realized they'd both had unprotected sex with him and wanted him to get tested for STDs"

      I've seen this posted in a few places now. What's the point in having _him_ tested? Shouldn't the _women_ be tested? Even if he had a STD, it doesn't necessarily mean they now have it. Wouldn't they be more interested in whether _they_ have an STD?

    53. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't they be more interested in whether _they_ have an STD?

      You'd think so, but no. This is Sweden. Men are *always* at fault here. Also, if they tested themselves, then there would be no basis for any police nor media attention. Form your own conclusions after connecting the dots, if you so wish. The whole thing stinks worse than surströmming.

    54. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to chase down more statistics for you just so you can shoot them down. Every study I've seen reports roughly between half and 80%. Take it or leave it. I don't care either way.

    55. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1

      Allow me to repeat myself. http://www.thewomenscenterinc.org/sexual.htm

      And if you don't like my sources, and don't think that studies are relevant, that's your problem. The fact is that many/most rapes go unreported for various reasons.

    56. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      My personal study showed that 100% of known rape cases were reported, and that’s just as valid as any of your sources where someone pulled a number out of their ass and said X number of rapes went unreported.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    57. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1

      Go fuck yourself. It won't be rape, after all, because you can't refuse consent.

    58. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Some people just don’t like facts. Not my problem.

      The fact is, they can only estimate the number of unreported rapes, because they are unreported. So they make up a number and morons like you go around parading it like it’s gospel truth.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    59. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by windcask · · Score: 1

      Some people just don’t like facts. Not my problem.

      Oh, you mean like yourself? People do studies to obtain facts; they don't get them from shooting their mouth off at statistical sources they don't like. That is the exclusive domain of an intellectual infant such as yourself.

      Moreover, what the hell does this have to do with Liu Xiaobo?

    60. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      People do studies to obtain facts

      Tell me, how do you study unreported rape cases? I tried once, but my crystal ball wasn’t working.

      Moreover, what the hell does this have to do with Liu Xiaobo?

      You brought it up, asshat. You tell me.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    61. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Oh, I have no doubt that many rapes go unreported. I'm just saying there's no way to tell how many unreported rapes there are. It could well be 70%, but there's absolutely no way to know.

    62. Re:No appreciation for subtlety in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't call Interpol because someone wants someone they slept with to have an STD test.

      I wouldn't be too sure about that. I was listening to a radio show discussing the British extradition system and apparently the Polish have been using it for things as trivial as one of their nationals taking the wrong jacket home while drunk (technically theft), that seems a rather petty misuse of the extradiction system to me. In that light I don't find it inconceivable that the Swedes would want to extradite soemone for something like this, but I don't know if it is out of character for Swedish law enforcement to call for extradition in a case like this or not.

  2. The Criminal from China's Point of View by eldavojohn · · Score: 1
    So, just to be clear, I do not want to sound like a Chinese sympathizer or proponent but from the article:

    In protest, the Chinese Government has set up its own rival awards ceremony to the Nobel prize; the "Confucius peace prize".

    I would wait a bit before that's confirmed. The only news in English I can find on it seems to indicate it doesn't exist or at least wasn't given to the recipient reported by the Associated Press. Those guys aren't often wrong but this sounds like a satire or problem in translation.

    Furthermore, here's the point of view from the horse's mouth (angry version here and refusal to resolve here) and they are propping up external support (though I think it's selective in choosing Heffermehl's words).

    So, yeah, censorship is bad in any form and I think the Chinese government is terrible in doing this but they do run things their own special way over there and censorship has always been the norm.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:The Criminal from China's Point of View by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      So, yeah, censorship is bad in any form and I think the Chinese government is terrible in doing this but they do run things their own special way over there and censorship has always been the norm.

      Gee, nobody's really said it to me in such a sexy way before. I guess it's okay as long as they have their "own special way." It is *special* after all.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    2. Re:The Criminal from China's Point of View by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should look around a little more. Here's a link: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20101209/lf_nm_life/us_china_nobel_confucius
      I suppose its possible this is also wrong, but the accompanying picture suggests otherwise.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:The Criminal from China's Point of View by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 0

      So the Taiwanese politician's spokesman saying he has rejected the price, and then the peace prize being handed to a 6 year old girl (with photo op and all) means we need confirmation? Of course they say it's no way connected to the chinese government, in the same way the Norwegian one isn't.

      It was an obvious attempt at first get sympathy from asian countries, then when that fell flat they tried to ridicule the Nobel peace price by giving it to a 6 year old girl... How can China manage to mess up their soft power to this degree?...

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    4. Re:The Criminal from China's Point of View by M.+Baranczak · · Score: 1

      The accompanying picture shows two blurry guys shaking hands. I don't think it suggests much of anything.

    5. Re:The Criminal from China's Point of View by paimin · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should try Google instead of Baidu. I'd paste you a link, but Slashdot hasn't fixed their paste bug.

      --
      Facebook is the new AOL
    6. Re:The Criminal from China's Point of View by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      China is "special" like Hitler's Germany, Mussolini's Italy, and Franco's Spain was special.
      They would love what China has created. State-run corporations, but which remain privately-owned.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  3. open source solves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is anyone ready to open source human governance?

    1. Re:open source solves by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 2

      Oh wow. This is exactly what I've been looking for.

      Now all we need is a place to institute it.

    2. Re:open source solves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called the internet.

      Open source governance is free of outmoded ideas like nationalism and ethnicity. If it ends up adhering to any geography, it will be to reality-based boundaries such as cities and ecoregions.

    3. Re:open source solves by mweather · · Score: 1

      Sounds great. Can I fork the police?

    4. Re:open source solves by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you still have that other government with its boot on your neck.

    5. Re:open source solves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're right. We should all just give up. Can we just go ahead and get government-issued mind-control implants right now?

      Or, wait a minute. Maybe, just maybe we should try (you know, just try) to see if we can have real democracy before those implants actually are issued.

      Those are your options. Which do you prefer?

    6. Re:open source solves by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Way to false dichotomy, dude.

      I believe I suggested something about finding a place to implement a metagovernment.

    7. Re:open source solves by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      This doesn't answer any questions such as what if you have two large vocal minorities each with polar opposite views that want radical changes while the silent majority get on with their lives?

      This whole thing totally ignores any actual political system for a simple "lets throw open source software at the problem and hope it works".

      There are currently 71 million people in my country, most without internet. Suddenly they're not represented? awesome.. and even if they were you'd never be able to handle the load of everyone having their say which is mostly a regurgitation of the 71 million other people's say.

      Add all that to the fact that forums are the worse place to gather suggestions, the loudest voice is always the vocal minority. Read any article where forums are involved in the decision making process for a huge community and the conclusion is always mostly to ignore suggestions on it.

    8. Re:open source solves by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Meh, start locally. We ran something like that with our college roommates in our rented house. But I've since graduated and got married. Yay for complete tyranny!

      One of the things I'd really find neat and useful is if I could compare my okcupid match profile with that of my elected officials. But I suppose none of them want to tie down their belief system that much... it would hamper their ability to weasel out of their supposed convictions to appease whatever base they're speaking to at the moment :P

    9. Re:open source solves by mundanetechnomancer · · Score: 1

      Fork tha police
      Comin straight from the underground

      isn't that what NWA was talking about?

  4. Looks like Slashdot.... by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... is looking to get itself banned...

    Seriously, when are we going to be honest about China's rise as an international bully?

    1. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We'd have to be honest about the fact that the US is also an international bully first.

    2. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, when are we going to be honest about China's rise as an international bully?

      Well, we're only starting to be honest about the USA's rise as an international bully now. We weren't really honest about the UK's rise as an international bully until it had lost most of its empire.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      We'd have to be honest about the fact that the US is also an international bully first.

      Those can happen in parallel. Many of us are neither American nor Chinese, so it's not mutually exclusive.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    4. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Hypocrisy is at the heart of all politics.

    5. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by mrsurb · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Australian politics - how much to suck up to each bully without pissing off the other because we so heavily rely on US for defence and China for $$$.

    6. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by wiredog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because no one (other than major networks, newspapers, and websites) is reporting on the attempts by the US and others to shutdown Wikileaks.

    7. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      I'm an American. And I'll tell you that Team America World Police was a documentary! We've got a lot of screwed up shitheads voting for long-legged, big-boobed dingbats and tea bagger idiots here, so give us a break. Stupid people breed faster than smart ones. We need to reverse the helmet and seatbelt laws and let "nature" take its course. Our leaders are not our best and brightest, they are our loudest and greediest. Thank goodness for Wikileaks to point a spotlight into the shithole that is our government backroom in action. Democrats and republicans? Two biggest bunch of fucking crooks the world may never see. Anyone who says different is not an actual American, just a douchebag apologist out to protect criminals posing as public servants.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    8. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Welcome to Australian politics

      Tell me about it, the border with the US is only about 50K south from where I'm sitting.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    9. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by nomadic · · Score: 1

      "We'd have to be honest about the fact that the US is also an international bully first."

      Why are you conditioning one on the other? Do you just personally enjoy being an enabler for human rights abuses?

    10. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I'm a US citizen, so it seems only natural that I would be more concerned with the actions of the government to which I pay taxes than I would be with the government of another country.

    11. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Stregano · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind if Cox blocked crappy places like Fox News and maybe Lifetime Channel's website. Maybe block a few "how to tell if your man is cheating on you websites" and we can call it a day.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    12. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by interval1066 · · Score: 2

      It took 2 seconds for some idiot to turn this into an America Haters thread. Figures. If you're an American, your an idiot. Lets stick to the topic, shall we? Or will you also blame China's internment of Tibet on America too?

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    13. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. nice rant.

      I especially liked: "Anyone who says different is not an actual American, just a douchebag apologist out to protect criminals posing as public servants."

    14. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      You have to remove the speck from your own eye before you’re allowed to take notice of a plank in someone else’s?

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    15. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by cobrausn · · Score: 1

      Considering other international 'bullies' throughout history, I tend to think the world has gotten off pretty lightly since WWII. Given historical behavior of other bullies (most notably Britain and other European nations), America's policies probably aren't all that different from how, say, Britain would probably still be acting if it were still the 'British Empire'. We westerners have a bad habit of behaving badly outside our borders. Luckily (?), it's starting to turn inwards as well, and we're taking notice.

      --
      How does it feel to be a liar with pants constantly on fire?
    16. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ... is looking to get itself banned...

      > Seriously, when are we going to be honest about China's rise as an international bully?

      Yep, they should stop harassing Assange and Wikileaks for those embarassing secrets leaked... oh, wait, sorry, wrong bully...

    17. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind if Cox blocked crappy places like Fox News and maybe Lifetime Channel's website. Maybe block a few "how to tell if your man is cheating on you websites" and we can call it a day.
      You mean you haven't learned how to erase your browser history? Or gotten a second sim card?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    18. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 1

      If you read the People's Daily (Chinese controlled media), you'll find this is exactly the logic used to defend their practices.

      If you hang out at an elementary school, you'll also find this is the logic third graders use to avoid taking responsibility.

      The only solution is everyone gets to take responsibility for their actions.

    19. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      I just don't understand how you think that China shouldn't be criticized until the US is completely blameless; that would basically mean China has a free ride for eternity.

    20. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I used to be Catholic, so yeah.

    21. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      I'm working on fixing the US. Let the people of China fix their own damn country. They can start by lynching a few politicians. A tank can only run over so many protesters before the meat gums up the machinery.

    22. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common tactic, nothing new. “You swatted a mosquito, so you’re JUST AS BAD as that country over there that tortures people! Who are you to criticize them!”

    23. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by poity · · Score: 1

      cancelling mis-clicked modding, sorry bro

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    24. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Then you remember it wrong. It went the other way around.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    25. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      No need to be so fucking pedantic. The moral is the same either way: mind your own business. In any case, the plank is in the eye of the United States. While China inflicts tyranny on its own people and the people of Tibet, the US inflicts tyranny on its own people, wages war in both Iraq and Afghanistan, uses military force in a vain attempt to stop the production of drugs that people all over the world want, and has been meddling in Middle Eastern politics to the point where people living in benighted shitholes like Iran and Yemen are happy to blame the US for their misery while ignoring their own rulers' tyranny. And let's not forget the US government's efforts to enforce its IP laws abroad for the benefit of American corporations.

    26. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      The moral is the same either way: mind your own business.

      No it isn’t, and that wasn’t the moral either way.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    27. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      As an apostate, I claim the right to find in the Bible any sort of moral I please, or none at all. Why should evangelicals have all the fun?

    28. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Go right on ahead then and continue to claim that you have to have 40/20 vision before you can point out that someone else is blind. It’s not like you have any more credibility to lose at this point.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    29. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      If I had any credibility in the first place, I wouldn't be arguing on the internet.

    30. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, that happened a LONG time ago.

    31. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      True, arguing on the internet would make you sort of a hypocrite. Considering that you’re not a hundred percent spotless yourself and you’re here trying to fix other people, I mean...

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    32. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      My hypocrisy has much in common with my arrogance and my depravity: it recognizes no limits.

    33. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      And your ability to make lame sarcastic quips?

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    34. Re:Looks like Slashdot.... by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

      Only lame? They used to be retarded. Looks like practice does pay off.

  5. This Is Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Posting a story that China censors XXX is really not news.

    It happens regularly in that country, I have no idea why it would be considered a news story on slashdot.

    The Great Firewall is a way of life there, so just get over it and save your righteous indignation for something else.

    1. Re:This Is Not News by somersault · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, if you knew more details you'd know that this story involves them also "persuading" at least 18 other countries not to attend the presentation, and not letting the man's relatives collect the prize for him etc. It's more than just them censoring things in their own country this time. This is just an update on that story.

      It would be funny if it wasn't affecting so many peoples' lives. At least our own governments try to make their lies plausible and their political maneuvers relatively subtle.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:This Is Not News by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "The Great Firewall is a way of life there, so just get over it and save your righteous indignation for something else."

      Yeah, speaking out against censorship is just a big waste of time, making political speech a government doesn't like a jail-able offense is no big deal, gunning down thousands of your own people when they protest is just a normal day in China, brutally suppressing an entire culture or two because your own Han people need "Lebensraum" is fine. No one should really give a shit about what China does. Its fine.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    3. Re:This Is Not News by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Though I don't disagree with most of what you said, I do have a little doubt that "grey" lies by governments are better than the brutal truth.

      Would you rather have Liu be charged with rape-by-sex-without-condom? I wouldn't.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    4. Re:This Is Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least our own governments try to make their lies plausible and their political maneuvers relatively subtle.

      Actually, I think I'd prefer it if the government did its lying and maneuvering in the open, rather than sugar coating it and trying to falsely sell it to the public "for the protection of freedom/national security/the economy", because "they tuuuk aaar jaaaabs" or trying to slide huge laws under the radar, just as many "e- and cyber-laws" are passed these days. No bit public consultation, just a quiet implementation of a law that criminalises or disadvantages millions, and there's nothing you can do about it, because the government will just do as they please. Asking the government to only make essential and sensible laws is like asking Microsoft to open source their codebase - it totally undermines their goals of passing off shit onto the people unable to do anything about it.

    5. Re:This Is Not News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every entity is entitled to watch out for its own welfare. Now unless China used bully tactics like "i'll conquer you if you go to oslo", i don't see a problem with the persuasion. That's along the same lines (except on international scale) of "i'll pay you 5 dollars not to go to 's party"
      as for not letting relatives collect the prize, I don't see why so many people feel justified in judging others by their ideals. let's pretend for a moment that china is entitled to make its own laws, and that it is legitimate for there to be a law that says "it's illegal to partake in activities that destabilize society / government". you may disagree with exactly what destabilizing entails, but let's pretend that your definition isn't the only one, and liu xiaobo crossed the line as defined by the sovereign nation of which he is a citizen and resident. then is it really so bad that a country is preventing a man and his relatives from profitting, monetarily and reputationally, from an activity that is clearly defined as illegal by his country?

    6. Re:This Is Not News by somersault · · Score: 1

      along the same lines (except on international scale) of "i'll pay you 5 dollars not to go to 's party"

      Bullshit. It's along the same lines as "if you go to the party I'll never sell you anything again, effectively crippling your economy because everything is made here these days". It's blackmail, pure and simple.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    7. Re:This Is Not News by somersault · · Score: 1

      Well, I don't like lying in any form to be honest, but it's pathetic when you hear the lies from China and North Korea. They say completely ridiculous things, like they're either insane, or they think the rest of the world is incredibly dumb.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    8. Re:This Is Not News by Mirey · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you rather your government's lies were obvious, so you knew what was real and what was fake, as opposed to everything being half-truths?

    9. Re:This Is Not News by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      You've drank too much kool-aid if you honestly thought the lies from Western governments are more "credible" than China.

      North Korea's lies are truly jokes (thanks to Wikileaks, we know that even Chinese officials think they are crazy), but I've yet to hear anything major from China that's truly ridiculous. Much of the "lies" you hear about are somewhat amplified by the fact that most of the west do not understand Chinese, stuff is lost in translation, and usually the context of the sound bites are not accurately conveyed. You wouldn't understand how crazy the western media's twists towards China related events can be, if you understood the story from China's perspective. As if BBC, CNN, etc. are actually unbiased. The fact that the PR of the Chinese government is horrible doesn't help either.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
  6. A point against the China Apologists: Censorship by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    For all the things China blames other countries for doing, China still is more totalitarian. They oppose the Pope since it takes away control from China, and they oppose the Nobel for it making China look bad. Normally, countries like the US take it in stride.

    So much for Deng's whitewash of government action by simply acting as a guard for semi-private entities.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  7. And yet "the people" by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 1

    The Chinese gov't is insanely powerful due to misguided patriotism.

    Or Misguided in my point of view at least. However if I was a citizen of Shanghai or another wealthy city in China, it would fill me with a certain amount of pride to know that almost every economy on the planet depends on how well that country is doing,

    The idea that people with economic prosperity will see their leaders as corrupt is like expecting U.S. citizens to be outraged over Gitmo

    --
    I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
    1. Re:And yet "the people" by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really call it "patriotism" if that were the only choice the government allowed.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    2. Re:And yet "the people" by somersault · · Score: 1

      is like expecting U.S. citizens to be outraged over Gitmo

      You mean they aren't? WTF..

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:And yet "the people" by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I have relative economic prosperity, see my leaders as corrupt, am a US citizen and am outraged over Gitmo.

    4. Re:And yet "the people" by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      Not me. I'd be wondering why I live in a shithole and the government makes a ton of money off my hard work... I'd probably just jump off the Foxconn building. I wouldn't be the first or last to pick death over living like a slave. Ask the people of Tibet, or the protesters at Tienanmen Square what they think about China? At least in the US I can call my government on their actions, Gitmo, Wikileaks, all of it. I'm free to say that's wrong and do something about it. In China you just smile and take it, or end up in a jail to correct your "patriotism." You need to get a clue.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    5. Re:And yet "the people" by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "if I was a citizen of Shanghai or another wealthy city in China, it would fill me with a certain amount of pride to know that almost every economy on the planet depends on how well that country is doing,"

      Sure. but during the cultural revolution you'd be told to feel that pride at the point of an AK-47. And probably get shot anyway. Yep, China's come a long way. Hey! Remember that 5 year plan that brilliant strategist Mao came up with to get everyone making steel in their back yards to get China modernized? Whatever happened with that? Oh yeah, millions of people starved to death because they stopped farming to make steel. What did China get? Tons of crappy, useless steel. Yeah, China knows what's best for everyone. Lets all get in line and do that.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    6. Re:And yet "the people" by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Your "compatriots" aren't. Otherwise in your "democratic" country you'd have voted in somebody who'd have shut down Gitmo.

      Democracy is a great way to see the true colors of at least half of a country's people.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    7. Re:And yet "the people" by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't really call it "patriotism" if that were the only choice the government allowed.

      To be fair I did say, "misguided".

      I think you have a slight perception problem if you think people in China have no choice in supporting the current regime, though.

      Its almost like you are only being informed of what your government wants you to know

      --
      I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
    8. Re:And yet "the people" by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      We voted for the one guy who said he was going to shut down gitmo, but like most everything else he said, it was just to get elected. For such an inexperienced politician, he played the game like a pro.

    9. Re:And yet "the people" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, the Cultural Revolution was awful. But that was the 60's.

      In he last thirty years, around 500 million people (i.e. roughly double than the population of the USA, about the population of the EU, or 1/12 of the humans in the whole world) have been been lifted out of poverty. If you are one of those people, you don't give two tosses about the Nobel Peace prize, or news censorship. You're just happy that you have food, heating and schooling. Remember that these 500 million were in poverty more recently than 1980, so it's not like they're unaware of just how shitty it was and how much (relatively) it is now. Imagine if you guys had grown up in a hovel in a slum, you wouldn't care if some anarchist wierdo (as far as you are concerned) gets locked up, you're just please to be holding a mobile phone

      That kind of thinking only comes once the population starts feeling entitled to it. I'm not saying the people aren't entitled to it, they are, but I'm saying that right now, most Chinese people just don't care that they don't have these right, and indeed many aren't even aware they don't have them, since they never exercised them. Check back in 20 years for a totally different outlook from a population who all have iPhones.

    10. Re:And yet "the people" by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "Sure, the Cultural Revolution was awful. But that was the 60's."

      2K dead in Tienanmen Square. That was in the late 80's. Sure, the score is trending down. How many do you think they'll kill in the next mass murder, er, "Political re-education"? A few hundred? And don't presume to tell me incarceration without due process has all but ended. I know better. The PRK has blood on its hands, they are just better able to hide it because they jail everyone who protests.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    11. Re:And yet "the people" by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      And with supposedly more than half of the population against Gitmo, you can't even find a politician that would actually shut it down.

      Statistically, simply randomly electing a John Doe would more likely than not get the job done.

      And yet you wonder why Democracy is not selling like hot cakes in some parts of the world where people have half a brain?

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    12. Re:And yet "the people" by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 1

      Well, here in Mexico most people used to think exactly like the Chinese do now. Many didn't mind the mass murder of Tlaltelolco Square in 1968 or the US sponsored Dirty War in the 70's since they had a realistic hope of a better future, if not for themselves, for they children. Now, with 30 years of stagnation, the north border almost closed and two generations that will not get a better life than their parents, people is more politically involved than 15 years ago.

      --
      Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
    13. Re:And yet "the people" by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Yes, in theory they have a choice.
      In practice, it takes some huge balls to actually take the alternative choice.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
  8. Cheap chinese knockoffs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Totally not worth the money, and produced under appalling conditions.

  9. China blocks websites at the expense of its people by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    ...US buys tons of Chinese-made goods at the expense of its working-class.

    Nothing ever changes...

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  10. Confucious Peace Prize by Shadmere · · Score: 1

    I think it should go to China, as a whole. What other country or organization has done so much for peace?*


    *Peace as defined by the Chinese government. Please check your Official 2011 Redefinition List for true definition. If you have lost your Official 2001 Redefinition List, please report to the nearest detention facility, and the problem will be corrected.

  11. Confucius say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get prize of peace, feel price of war.

    1. Re:Confucius say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wise man say: Man who eat many prunes, sit on toilet many moons...

  12. China's thuggery won't stop the determined. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    They simply just don't like people pointing the facts out. Nor do they like people finding out for themselves.

    The people who want to see Slashdot won't be deterred by a ban by the Chinese government.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:China's thuggery won't stop the determined. by Apagador-Man · · Score: 0

      Am I the only one who read "China's buggery"?

      --
      In the end, there can be only one!
  13. Confucius he say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Confucius was once passing by Mount Tai, when he heard a woman, who was standing in front of a grave, wailing bitterly. He sent one of his disciples to enquire the reason. "By the sound of your lamentation," he said, "you seem to be afflicted by some grievous sorrow." The woman replied, "Yes, a tiger killed and devoured my father-in-law, and then my husband suffered the same fate. Now my son has been gobbled up by another tiger." Hearing this, Confucius asked her, "Then why don't you leave this place?" The woman answered, "Because here there is no tyrannical rule." Thereupon, Confucius turned to his disciples and said, "Keep this in mind, young fellows: tyranny is fiercer than a tiger."

    1. Re:Confucius he say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the Siberian tiger is all but gone from Dongbei. But tyranny...

  14. How do they dare.... by mseeger · · Score: 1

    We, the sophisticated western people would never do such a thing. Take a web site like that nasty wikileaks that is publishing our diplomatic small talk. We would never ever dream of kicking them from their hosters, cancel their bank accounts, block/ddos their web sites or imprison their founder.

    Cross my heart...

    1. Re:How do they dare.... by u-235-sentinel · · Score: 1

      We, the sophisticated western people would never do such a thing. Take a web site like that nasty wikileaks that is publishing our diplomatic small talk. We would never ever dream of kicking them from their hosters, cancel their bank accounts, block/ddos their web sites or imprison their founder.

      Cross my heart...

      and hope to what? :-)

      --
      Has Comcast disconnected your Internet account? Same here. You can read about it at http://comcastissue.blogspot.com
    2. Re:How do they dare.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hop to the left ;-)

    3. Re:How do they dare.... by mseeger · · Score: 1

      Stick a needle in my eye ;-)

  15. Confucius say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... let peace prevail and we have peace all over China (freedom no, but peace it seems there is).

  16. Re:China blocks websites at the expense of its peo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US, and the entire western world, buys Chinese goods at the expense of manufacturing jobs. Not everyone can work at Wal-Mart.

  17. That doesn't justify its existence. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The existence of the censorship is a news story, as there are nations that don't make a point of plugging up dissent. At least, not as thuggishly or thoroughly as China.

  18. Confucius Say.... by SuperKendall · · Score: 2

    Man who win Nobel prize behind bars values cake with file more.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. What would Confucious do? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I wonder what Confucious would think of

    1) a peace prize in his honor

    2) such a prize being given out under the direction of the current China leadership

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:What would Confucious do? by DocSavage64109 · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting point. Much like what would Jesus think of the modern organized religions and the feuding between them.

      I would think that with the importance east asia places on philosophy, that they wouldn't be so easily swayed by censorship. I suppose that they are no more immune to their media, and the subtle brainwashing that goes with it, than we are to ours.

    2. Re:What would Confucious do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Confucius, believing in the value of social order and respect for authority would be pleased.

    3. Re:What would Confucious do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confucius wouldn't like it much. See:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_Olds

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticize_Lin,_Criticize_Confucius

    4. Re:What would Confucious do? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't the 60's and 70's anymore. That was the past, dude - no one nowadays thinks the cultural revolution was a good idea. Confucius would see the value in the current incarnation of the Chinese government.

  20. Re:China blocks websites at the expense of its peo by gstoddart · · Score: 1

    Not everyone can work at Wal-Mart.

    No, because more manufacturing jobs have been lost to China than Wal Mart could possibly make up for.

    --
    Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  21. Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by clone52431 · · Score: 1

    If all the major internet routing hubs outside China started dropping packets coming from or going to Chinese IP addresses, I wonder how long it would take for the Chinese government to be on its knees begging for another chance? More significantly, I wonder how long it would take before the Chinese people would finally rise and demand that their government act like a civilized part of the internet community?

    It would probably be at least as effective as those stupid “internet addiction” camps they make their youth attend. Give them a dose of their own medicine...

    --
    Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    1. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by Tom · · Score: 2

      I was wondering what it'd take for the same people who yell "censorship!" whenever someone proposes to restrict traffic for political, copyright or other legal reasons to come around with their own version of it.

      Not routing to China is censorship based on political views, plain and simple.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Not routing to China is censorship based on political views, plain and simple.

      Yes, it is. Sometimes you fight fire with fire.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    3. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most websites accessed by Chinese people are in Chinese language. And guess where those are? Yes, in China.

      You and the US can no longer be outraged at China after what the US has done. What China has done is expected. What US has done re: wikileaks is simply illegal and immoral. Now US is threatening New York Times too....

    4. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Most websites accessed by Chinese people are in Chinese language. And guess where those are? Yes, in China.

      Yes, I’ve heard that claim before, and it really doesn’t make any difference one way or the other.

      What US has done re: wikileaks is simply illegal and immoral. Now US is threatening New York Times too....

      That’s a completely different subject. You’re trolling.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    5. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by Tom · · Score: 1

      You and the US can no longer be outraged at China after what the US has done.

      So many false assumptions in such a short sentence. :-)

      I'm a German living in Germany. I quite dislike most of what the US is doing these days, especially including the Wikileaks suppression. I'm quite a bit less outraged at the Chinese, who for all their faults at least aren't corrupt liars claiming the moral high grounds for themselves.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was wondering what it'd take for the same people who yell "censorship!" whenever someone proposes to restrict traffic for political, copyright or other legal reasons to come around with their own version of it.

      Not routing to China is censorship based on political views, plain and simple.

      Who threw the first stone?

    7. Re:Cancer - cut it off... damage - route around it by Tom · · Score: 1

      Who threw the first stone?

      Some monkey in Africa, ca. 1,000,000 BC - why ?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  22. Wait a minute, what are you saying? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2

    Are you saying that the US government is trying to supress freedom by setting up rape charges on its enemies?

    OR are you saying we can get laid by upsetting the US? Someone give me a flag and some matches. I am going to get LAID!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Wait a minute, what are you saying? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Wasn't us, that's his own personal problems.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Wait a minute, what are you saying? by maxume · · Score: 1

      He's saying that presented with the possibility of a questionable situation (that is, I haven't seen enough to rule out Assange acting questionably) involving a potentially vindictive woman (she did post a revenge strategy to the internet), he instead chooses to believe that pressure from a foreign government must be involved.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  23. Confucius say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He who use my name for lame propaganda stunt, wake up with smelly fingers and look like fools.

  24. Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So China is taking a cue from the United States and censoring websites it doesn't like, eh?

  25. Re:China blocks websites at the expense of its peo by somersault · · Score: 1

    The working class buys cheap goods at the expense of itself you mean. If America restricted imports too much then you'd be complaining about that too.

    --
    which is totally what she said
  26. Confucius peace prize by kungfugleek · · Score: 2

    Of course, I prefer the peace prize in its original Klingon text.

  27. This isn't censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't censorship. China are still letting the News sites say what they want, they're just not using THEIR infrastructure (the roads, telecoms, etc) to push stuff they don't like!

    PLUS there is no US constitution in China, so therefore they can't break the rules (since the only source of law is, apparently, the US constitution to many slashdot posters).

    1. Re:This isn't censorship by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      China has intentionally positioned itself as the only highway between the Chinese people and the rest of the world, and it has closed that highway to anything it doesn’t like. That is censorship.

      They haven’t prevented the news sites from publishing anything they want, but they have prevented the news sites from having any avenue of getting those stories to people in China. That is censorship.

      They can’t censor anything for anyone outside of China, but the people living there are getting a censored version of the internet.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    2. Re:This isn't censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese people can bypass the GFW through VPN or proxy.

    3. Re:This isn't censorship by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Is that legal?

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
  28. Obilg John Lennon by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

    If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao
    you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow.

  29. Censorship, not protest by mbone · · Score: 1

    They are being blocked as censorship, not protest. The PRC doesn't care what the BBC says, as long as the Chinese can't read things they don't want them to read.

  30. Chinese Nobel Peace Prize by Evildonald · · Score: 1

    All they have to do is host their own Peace prize and make Juilan Assange the winner.

  31. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Confucius Peace Prize? Bwahahahahaha!! Is China trying to get on South Park again?

  32. Lieberman is jealous by atheos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    THIS is why politicians like Lieberman wants an internet kill switch in the US

  33. Now what? by garry_g · · Score: 1

    Too bad the US has made it d@mn hard for itself to complain over China's Internet restrictions ... all they can complain about now is how ineffective their own control over the Internet is ...

  34. Re:A point against the China Apologists: Censorshi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well of course it is. China is basically a fascist state at this point, no matter what they call themselves.

  35. Replace Chinese Govt by _bulbgiver_ · · Score: 1

    This is atrocious ! The Chinese should rise up in armed revolt and establish a people's state. Oh wait...

  36. BS - CNN not blocked by xnpu · · Score: 2

    CNN is not blocked. The CNN homepage doesn't pass the keyword filter currently, which may or may not be related to the prize, but any other page works just fine.

    1. Re:BS - CNN not blocked by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      The CNN homepage doesn’t pass the keyword filter correctly because the Chinese government firewall detects the keyword and starts dropping packets into a black hole.

      But that’s just peanuts. Explain this...

      When Liu was named the peace prize winner two months ago, initial reports were blacked out on CNN, BBC and French satellite channel TV5, while the state network China Central Television did not report on the prize.

      “Mysterious corruption of the video feeds prevented the reports from getting through, but any other CNN reports got through just fine!”

      Yeah, it’s obviously not a problem with the infrastructure. It must be CNN’s fault.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    2. Re:BS - CNN not blocked by xnpu · · Score: 1

      The video scrambling happens all the time. Cities in South China often provide Hong Kong channels in the cable feeds. When something sensitive is mentioned during the news you'll suddenly see a few minutes of the CCTV feed until the item is finished.

    3. Re:BS - CNN not blocked by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      And the web censorship works the same way. When something sensitive is mentioned you suddenly see a few minu~_^*)&&%&*)(((

      NO CARRIER

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    4. Re:BS - CNN not blocked by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Yes. My original point was exactly that. CNN itself is not blocked.

    5. Re:BS - CNN not blocked by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      Ok. Fair point, then, but it could’ve been explained more clearly.

      They’re not blocking the CNN website in its entirety, per se, there just appears to be something on the homepage that triggers the connection killswitch on the Chinese government’s firewall. But they’re still basically blocking it.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    6. Re:BS - CNN not blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No wonder some people feared the census. I'd be afraid or suspicious of the officials if that kind of blocking where done in my country.

  37. Barbara Streisand Effect by vampire_baozi · · Score: 2

    Seriously, when will the Chinese government learn?

    Liu Xiaobo was a nobody, just one more dissident activist who wrote some pretty crazy stuff. Nobody outside of dissident circles gave a crap about Charter 08 or even heard of it before it got banned.

    Xiaobo himself: He's crazy as far as dissidents go. He basically worships everything Western, and has basically advocated China becoming a Western colony. Noone inside of China would take most of his stuff seriously- yet China insists of giving him credibility as a dissident. He'd still be a nobody if they didn't give him so much publicity.

    With this, he'll turn into another Dalai Lama, except that unlike the Dalai Lama, he (was) just a nobody convinced that everything Western is good and everything Chinese is bad. If they had just left Charter 08 alone, no problems, it would have been passed around to the usual crowd and quickly forgotten. Instead it has become a rallying point.

    Sort of like the "My dad is Li Gang" stuff- instead of censoring the story, if they just let it out and then publicly castrated the fucker, everyone would have been happy.

    They really need help with PR. Even when they do the right thing, hushing things up makes it look like they really are up to something. Even when the guy in question really does deserve to be imprisoned (under Chinese law, even if such laws are unjust).

    1. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      The Barbara Streisand effect – outside of China, maybe.

      The people in China? The vast majority of them really, truly, still won’t care. Which is why I feel that it might be time for more drastic measures.

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    2. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by vampire_baozi · · Score: 1

      It applies in China as well- though only among a subset of the population, though still a much larger subset than would have been reached otherwise. For example. my friends on Chinese college campuses have been talking quite a bit about Charter 08 and Liu Xiaobo- almost purely as a result of censorship attempts.

    3. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

      Man, so true.

      --
      Don't quote me on this.
    4. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by Wocka_Wocka · · Score: 0

      Sarah Palin was a nobody, just one more Alaskan who said some pretty crazy stuff. ... she's crazy as far as Alaskans go. ... yet America insists of giving her credibility...

      My God! I just had a realization -- Liu Xiaobo is Sarah Palin!

    5. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has basically advocated China becoming a Western colony.

      Would implementing Charter 08 make China a Western colony? I'd bet here in the West the "working class" soon considers the "West" as a Chinese colony in regards to IP and jobs as the Chinese ownership increases globally.

    6. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even when the guy in question really does deserve to be imprisoned (under Chinese law, even if such laws are unjust).

      I suppose this is relative but traitors in almost any country get sent to prison. I guess if you don't like the country in question you can argue it's unjust but this is just a double standard (your country does it and it's just fine but another country does it and suddenly it's an injustice).

    7. Re:Barbara Streisand Effect by lederhosen · · Score: 1

      In my country (to my knowledge, in modern time) no one has been put in jail because they criticize the government, and we have plenty of people that do criticize the government in news papers, radio, television and on the net.
      If they have been put to jail it has been because they have leaked classified information or been spying for foreign countries or similar. Not because they are crazy and believe that China and north Korea are the paradise on earth.

      We even have such lunatics that regularly write such stuff in the papers!

  38. All Politics Is Local by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    As bad as the Chinese government's actions look to outsiders, we have to remember that ultimately all politics is local. The Chinese government doesn't care what we think only with staying in power at home. And how do you do that? By making sure that nothing riles up the billion plus Chinese citizens most of whom probably don't care much about foreign news outlets or peace prizes anyway. So why get them thinking about stuff like that which doesn't make money and can only cause disharmony? As for a Chinese version of the Peace Prize. I'm sure that will only be awarded to honorable (and safely controllable) Chinese citizens. Can't risk losing face to some gwai-loh who might brazenly refuse the prize. And most Chinese citizens would consider the prize an honor and good for career advancement in China. Again, good stuff for the locals.

    1. Re:All Politics Is Local by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

      That Confusious thing is not even controlled by mainland China government. It's just something bought up by a small small organization formed by a few scholars. The scale is not even big enough to be paid attention to. It's really just advertised by foreign medias together with the nobel prize news.

  39. China's still worse, no matter how you defend them by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    China's government can't take the criticism, so they go about their totalitarian ways and shut it off.

    Nobody's been disappeared, executed, or harvested for organs in the US for the Wikileaks events. All those involved have more than the show trials that China gives often, and are not simply removed from existence.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  40. Re:China's still worse, no matter how you defend t by sydneyfong · · Score: 1

    Name a person that is executed, or harvested for organs due to the 08 Charter movement that Liu started.

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
  41. A more mature way... by it5complicated · · Score: 1

    China should give Noam Chomsky the Confucius prize for "being a courageous voice in a corrupt and hypocritical nation and having the temerity to call the US the best nation in the world". They should also learn to treat dissidents the American way: let them rant. Pay newspapers to criticise him subtly while praising him over a period of time. Sooner or later, they're gonna get called insane.

  42. google in china is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you enter Liu Xiaobo into a Google search in mainland China you get- "This webpage is not available"

  43. heya china by BlackBloq · · Score: 1

    Face it China, you suck shit in some ways. Don't hide it, you are just shitty. The more you complain about this, the more light it casts on your shittyness. Vampire motherfuckers. PS: This FU is not to the people of China, but to the body of the government who imprisons them.

  44. The Nobel peace prize is a fucking joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Henry Kissinger, Jasser Arafat, Obama... need I say more? I for one salute the Chinese for their efforts.