Slashdot Mirror


Micro-USB Cellphone Charger Becomes EU Standard

An anonymous reader writes "The European Commission has put into effect a June 2009 agreement stating that major cellphone manufacturers should standardize their charging/data connection ports to the popular Micro-USB format. CEN-CENELEC and ETSI provided the standards by which these 14 companies will abide to make cell phone recharging and data transfer easy." Apple may even bring the next-gen iPad along for the ride.

302 comments

  1. US by weems · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wish they would do this in the US. It's dumb that each company has their own chargers.

    1. Re:US by Kral_Blbec · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would guess that most companies are going to bring it over to the US by default. If they have to design the EU versions with micro usb then hopefully they wont reinvent the wheel to redesign it for a US release.

    2. Re:US by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      They won't redesign anything important, but I'd bet a few will still throw on their proprietary connector, which coincidentally has four meaningful pins and a size that fits a particular hole in the case.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    3. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We've got a bizarre jungle of proprietary data and charging connectors because of the free market, Mr. Redpants McCommunist.

    4. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But, but... the invisible hand of the market?!

      (Yes, that was sarcasm).

    5. Re:US by cliffjumper222 · · Score: 1

      It's not a government regulation, but the CTIA and GSMNA introduced the same measure in the US last year (well 2009) and it's a mandatory feature for all new handsets released from the big carriers now. Next step is to stop bundling chargers in the boxes like Apple did on the iPod. Then get rid of all the CDROM's, wired headsets, manuals and other junk accessories - they are almost gone now. Final step will be to get rid of the boxes themselves and ship in bulk to the stores and have them slipped into a (bio-degradable) bag at POS along with the warranty slip and legalese, or even skip the bag.

    6. Re:US by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      At the stores? I haven't bought a phone at a store since my first one in the late 90s.

    7. Re:US by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Good. Less shit for me to throw away.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:US by pigpilot · · Score: 1

      I think half the reason for having so many propriety designs is to force the consumer to buy expensive chargers and docks from the manufacturers. It has always been cheaper to go with a 'standard' design but where's the profit in that? You can find the same situation with home printers where the likes of HP still likes reinventing the wheel if they can find a way of charging more for commodity hardware.

    9. Re:US by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The standard is fortunately leaking into Australia. I just can't see an advantage of micro USB over mini USB.

    10. Re:US by neumayr · · Score: 2

      Everyone has mini USB cables lying around. Micro USB? Not so much. So the advantage is that there is a little money to be made with branded micro USB cables.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    11. Re:US by ThreeGigs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Micro is rated for more insertions (I believe 10,000) than mini. Plus, micro enables thinner devices.

    12. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just can't see an advantage of micro USB over mini USB.

      Micro-USB has a better design. It will survive more insertion/removal cycles and most of the wear occurs on the cable instead of the device.

      None of this registers with the 'they just want to make you buy it again' crowd, however.

    13. Re:US by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      I just can't see an advantage of micro USB over mini USB.

      I have had several mini USB phones where the plug would fall out of the phone or lose connection if I just looked at it in the wrong way.

      Micro USB feels much more stable. I can even feel a little "click" when I plug it in, whereas the mini USB was only held in place by friction.

    14. Re:US by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Funny

      The invisible hand of the market has a propensity towards fisting.

      --
      This space available.
    15. Re:US by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Funny

      Micro is rated for more insertions (I believe 10,000) than mini.

      I kept telling my GF that, she wouldn't buy it.

      --
      This space available.
    16. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well... duh!! It's obvious to everyone that phone manufacturers liked to 'cheese' their profit by after market accessories. Also the home printer argument is so 2001. When's the last time you've seen an article on /. about the outrageous printer cartridge prices? Except for the odd Lexmark/HP microchip argument, most people have moved on and either print at work or have purchased a b/w laser printer because they're so incredibly cheap now.

    17. Re:US by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I have a lot more mini USB cables knocking around than mini but it is about half the thickness, so it is more suitable for thin devices. My HTC desire came with one cable and I bought another one off ebay from Hong Kong for less than 2 euros.

    18. Re:US by arunce · · Score: 2

      Yeah... right, for extra functionality like faster charge or something else better we have this extra special model specific cable.

    19. Re:US by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Worse, they might corrupt the whole idea by supporting USB, but requiring the charger to authenticate itself, and either refusing to charge or deliberately drawing less power when you detect the wrong charger.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    20. Re:US by Gnavpot · · Score: 1

      (Once again, this time with correct quotation tags):

      I just can't see an advantage of micro USB over mini USB.

      I have had several mini USB phones where the plug would fall out of the phone or lose connection if I just looked at it in the wrong way.

      Micro USB feels much more stable. I can even feel a little "click" when I plug it in, whereas the mini USB was only held in place by friction.

    21. Re:US by fearlezz · · Score: 1

      I don't think they will bring it over to the US by default. Or at least not voluntarily. The main reason why cellphone manufacturers switch to connectors that are 0.05mm smaller than the previous version, is to sell more spare adapters. This practice makes them a lot of money.

      I think that they will only switch to one common standard if (a) having two production lines for european and other phones gets more expensive than having one (b) the government forces cellphone manufacturers to do so.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    22. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Blackberry Pearls. They only charge with Blackberry's usb cable because the phone requires a certain amount of power. Some USB cords work but other ones don't. The only guarantee is the Blackberry cable. Most frustrating phone I ever owned.

    23. Re:US by bluesatin · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind that a lot of phones get their own specialised outer casing compared to the standard version, so I doubt it would be much work to just make a small modification such as the socket.

      Take for example the HTC Hero: Standard Version and the American Version.

    24. Re:US by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      I wish they would do this in the US. It's dumb that each company has their own chargers.

      Sounds socialist to me. I like letting capitalism sort it out. Just like it did with CDMA, TDMA, GSM, LTE and WiMAX. Thanks to capitalism we have the cheapest and fastest wireless phones known to the world.

    25. Re:US by Teun · · Score: 2

      No wonder, the 'Standard' version looks so socialist Fox News would bury it in five minutes!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    26. Re:US by JamesP · · Score: 2

      "deliberately drawing less power"

      Oh you mean, using a conservative figure for power capability so your charger doesn't burn/overheat/explode, etc?

      Seems ok by me.

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    27. Re:US by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      I kept telling my GF that, she wouldn't buy it.

      Try it with a thinner device. It'll seem bigger.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    28. Re:US by anotherncbeachbum · · Score: 1

      *looks at my Motorola phones* Yeah, that. It would be nice if I could plug my phone into my PC to recharge instead of having to use their proprietary charger. I have one Moto at work that has it's own adapter for the AC and DC; the same phone, a generation newer, uses different ones. Annoying.

    29. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK its not ONLY the connector... the whole idea behind this is to make charging with other chargers than the original easier.

    30. Re:US by bcmm · · Score: 2

      But shorting D+ and D- has a fixed meaning: a device can draw up 1.8A.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    31. Re:US by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      The USB standard covers how much power a device is capable of drawing. Even the $2 chinese USB wallplugs, or USB cigaretlighter plugs can power even the toughest load a USB certified device is capable of drawing. Do anything else and you run the real risk of damaging computer's motherboards. The parent's concerns are quite valid.

    32. Re:US by JamesP · · Score: 1

      But shorting D+ and D- has a fixed meaning: a device can draw up 1.8A.

      That's interesting, I was not aware of that.

      Still, micro-USB charger of my smartphone is only capable of 0.7A. Not sure if D+ D- are shorted there.

      1.8A would be great really, but maybe not practical (considering size of charger).

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    33. Re:US by neokushan · · Score: 1

      "It has always been cheaper to go with a 'standard' design but where's the profit in that?"

      This logic is extremely circular. Sounds like big business to me!

      --
      +1 IDisagreeSoHeMustBeATrollOrAnAstroturferOrAShill
    34. Re:US by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Your argument would make sense if it weren't for the fact that it's been possible to buy cheaper third-party chargers for all of the major phone brands for at least a decade. A more likely observation is that it encourages a form of lock in. I have a Nokia phone, and Nokia chargers are standard across their line and you can buy third party ones for under £5, so I have a few lying around. If I buy a new Nokia phone, I already have a load of spare chargers for it. If I buy a {someone else} phone, I need to buy spare chargers on top of the phone. Given two phones at the same price, the Nokia one is cheaper in total.

      That said, I really wish more manufacturers would adopt the charging system from the Palm Pre - I love the idea of just popping the phone down on a flat surface and having it start charging. I've had enough flimsy phone charger connections snap to not really trust any physical connection that needs plugging in and unplugging repeatedly.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    35. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? The USA has a long history of doing things that the rest of the world have since standardised on. GSM, NTSC, 120v, being one of three that still use Imperial (Burma and Irovy Coast being the other two).

    36. Re:US by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The main reason why cellphone manufacturers switch to connectors that are 0.05mm smaller than the previous version, is to sell more spare adapters

      Who does this? I've only owned phones from Siemens, Sony Ericsson and Nokia, but they've all been compatible with chargers from the previous generation. The only exception is Nokia, but they included an adaptor with each phone that let you use it with the older charger for several years after moving to the newer form factor.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    37. Re:US by digitig · · Score: 1

      I just can't see an advantage of micro USB over mini USB.

      Because most phones on sale in Europe at the moment seem to use mini-USB, so they hope to get at least one more cable sale out of this? (Except to techies like us who already have micro-USB cables lying around, of course).

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    38. Re:US by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The invisible hand snapped off the charging jack in the socket, so couldn't be reached for comment.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    39. Re:US by noidentity · · Score: 1

      The invisible hand of the market says that the buyers just don't care about having N different chargers. They claim to care, but their actions show otherwise.

    40. Re:US by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      "wired headsets, manuals and other junk accessories "
      as long as the manual can be obtained by going online to http://countrycodeoemsite/support/docs/%25model%25/
      im all for less bits of paper being included in the box.

      Oh btw the box is biodegradable and serves as inner core packaging SINCE SHIPPERS CAN AND WILL THROW THE BOXES AROUND. Now having the box be the minimum size to enclose the phone and a charger would be grand.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    41. Re:US by johanw · · Score: 1

      That is what Nokia already does: my new E72 charges with micro USB but still has the traditional thin version of ther Nokia charger which charges much faster. Since I had some of these chargers already I'm using that now, the only times I charge via USB is when I need a data connection anyway. Biggest advantage is that tethering via USB won't drain the phone battery now that it charges via USB (my laptop battery is another matter of course).

    42. Re:US by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      In the end - if customers decide to prefer phones with a standardized charger the other models will soon go out of production.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    43. Re:US by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish they would do this in the US. It's dumb that each company has their own chargers.

      If they did this in the US, you would hear screaming about how it's another example of government's heavy thumb on the "free market" and comparisons to Stalin, Pol Pot and Kim Jong Il. Fox and Drudge would say Obama was "taking over the cell phone industry" and "shoving" "new regulations" down our "throats".

      I don't think it's safe to try to do this sort of standardization here in the US. We've got enough trouble. It might be the last straw that sets off violent revolt. "They took our cell phone adapters! Those TYRANTS!"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    44. Re:US by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 1

      NTSC is more than the US. It's almost all of North America, most of South America. Japan, South Korea. and the Philippines.

      --
      SSC
    45. Re:US by bmajik · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Apple had been planning on throwing the magsafe power connector on some future iPhone.

      Depending on how the EU decree was worded, presumably they'd be disbarred from doing so now.

      Does this law sunset? When mini-USB is as much of a relic as DIN-5 keyboard connectors, or when 95% of phones use inductive charging mats, will EU-market phones still have these silly ports on them?

      (incidentally, I hate any non-USB interface on a phone. The EU directive certainly appeals to my current shortsighted desires. But I'm not going to pretend that my desires are anything other than shortsighted -- what we can see easily is that this will stop some of the short term dumbness around proprietary chargers. What we don't see is the other good things some of us will want that this is going to impede or prevent. This is the universal truism of government -- we like what we can see in front of us; we rarely consider the disparate and longer term implications of policy)

      --
      My opinions are my own, and do not necessarily represent those of my employer.
    46. Re:US by tepples · · Score: 1

      I haven't bought a phone at a store since my first one in the late 90s.

      Then where do you try a phone to make sure that you will like it and not have to pay return shipping and the 15 percent restocking fee when you return it to an online store?

    47. Re:US by jank1887 · · Score: 1

      The invisible hand of the market responds to price and cost pressures. Hence, the fact that all of these adaptors are incompatible between brands and go right into the landfill makes no participation. Until we can impose disposal costs on purchase decisions (pricing or something) it won't matter.

      oh, was that a whoosh?

    48. Re:US by Nimey · · Score: 1

      More like other considerations trump it, for whatever reasons.

      For that matter, how many phone-store salesweasels will point out what kind of charger it takes, and what Joe Sixpack is going to know that there's a nascent standard for phone chargers after getting shafted for so many years by the lack of a standard?

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    49. Re:US by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Well, it did eventually work in regards to Sony's ridiculous memory stick. They're still making them but the last time I looked at Sony cameras they all supported both the memory stick and SD cards at the same time. The problem are the uneducated consumers. I'd think the better solution (if you really want the free market to decide) would be to enforce clear labels on packaging like what we do with food ingredients and lists a specific statistic like percentage of devices made that use the format. Or in apples case that it's a proprietary format they'll not share.

    50. Re:US by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      The invisible hand self-organized a Standards committee which mandated the use of the mini-USB for cellphones, and which most manufacturers are now following. It's the same way that the invisible hand self-organized committees to standardize on PCI and PCI-express for desktops.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    51. Re:US by sharkey · · Score: 1

      If it's good enough for the Obamas, it should be good enough for the free market.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    52. Re:US by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I just can't see an advantage of micro USB over mini USB.

      Some replies note advantages, and they're right, but the bigger problem is inserting the Micro-USB without precise visual study of connector alignment.

      Mini-USB has enough tactile feedback to plug it in without looking at it. Our recent phones have Micro-USB and I've had to take a silver marker to the 'up' side of the cable so I can plug my phone in to the charger at night without turning on the bright lights. I can plug in all the connectors on the back of a standard computer from the front (without looking, just tactile feedback) no problem. My mother's phone has Micro-USB and she can't even get it to go in on some days.

      Had the market been allowed to mature naturally, these problems would have been figured out by some annoyed and enterprising engineers or industrial designers. But now we have mandated mediocrity. That's the problem with mandates - not that there shouldn't be a common standard, but that we'll be forced to live with a poor one. Maybe in 10 years they'll mandate something that works well.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    53. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Micro USB, not mini USB. I wish they had gone for the sturdier mini USB instead.

    54. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Again, the liberal slashdot crowd gets the opposition's viewpoint completely wrong. The only reason this would't work in the US is because we can't trust our lawmakers to get this right because they by definition know more about politicking than the subjects they are making laws about. What happens in 5 years when micro USB is dated technology and limiting innovation. Instead of charging your phone in 5 minutes with new tech, you're stuck with what the law requires. Instead of 10GBps transfers via new tech, you're stuck with micro USB. Granted, this standardization is good and I support it fully, but the government is not to be trusted to do this right, as it has been well proven that tech advances faster that laws can keep up.

    55. Re:US by GaryOlson · · Score: 2

      Micro is rated for more insertions (I believe 10,000) than mini.

      I kept telling my GF that, she wouldn't buy it.

      Show her a gold plated Monster micro. Add a diamond stud; she won't resist.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    56. Re:US by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      A mediocre solution now is better than a perfect solution "tomorrow"!?

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    57. Re:US by iinlane · · Score: 1

      I'm from Europe, I just bought an Nexus S phone from US that has USB charger. My previous Nokia 5800 phone had the micro USB port, but it could not be used for charging. It was strange because the Nokia charger was 5V but used proprietary connector.

    58. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last 4 electronic devices I've bought (cell 'phone, Nook, digital camera and GPS) have all used micro USB for charging. Looks like it may become some sort of standard here in the US by default.

    59. Re:US by iksbob · · Score: 1

      >(considering size of charger)
      Switched mode power supplies can be remarkably compact and light weight. I've got a power adapter for an old D-Link wireless router sitting on my bench. It's on the small side of 1" x 2" x 2.5" (perfectly manageable IMO) and outputs 2.5A @ 5VDC. Apple's 1" plug-cube USB adapters output 1A @ 5V... Not particularly high current, but any smaller would be difficult to grip.

    60. Re:US by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Few people research most of their purchasing decisions, and most people research few of them. It is my impression that high-tech consumers who keep themselves generally informed on standards in storage and connectors and such do not pay anything like the same amount of attention to the quality of the food they buy.

    61. Re:US by Kenshin · · Score: 0

      So "do nothing", basically.

      Hope you're happy with that box of useless power adaptors.

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    62. Re:US by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      At a store. But it's a lot easier to not have to claim that $100 rebate by mail in and order the phone from the carrier website directly, or get huge discounts at Amazon or wherever. Plus not being charged sales tax on that extra money is nice.

    63. Re:US by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 2

      No, certainly not "do nothing". Help incentive the industry to set their own common standard, not dictate one to them. And build in a facility for it to change without government intervention. Government should be about setting policy, not about setting specific standards. There's a subtle but important distinction, lost on most who believe government is the solution to all our woes.

    64. Re:US by coryking · · Score: 1

      Samsung. Every model they make has a different charger port.

    65. Re:US by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      IIRC, PCI/PCIe are Intel inventions. Also, many phone mfgs were already using mini-usb for charging.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    66. Re:US by Randle_Revar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Self-organized only because the EU threatened to impose it on them if they didn't do it themselves.

    67. Re:US by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Certainly, but a bad solution now is a bad solution. So my Mom doesn't have to spend $15 on a new proprietary charger, but she can't use the one that's mandated - that doesn't even rise to the level of 'mediocre'. Even the terrible Motorola charger plug design was easy to attach to the phone (until the connectors wore out after a couple years).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    68. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you're living in a dream world... this hasn't happened with removable batteries or anything else, the US has to do it for themselves

    69. Re:US by great+om · · Score: 1

      micro is way better for one reason: its unsquishable. not a month goes by that one of my 200 blackberry users don't need a replacement mini usb charger because they rolled over it with their office chair.

      --
      ------- Oh damn.... the Sigfile escaped... -Great OM
    70. Re:US by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Cell phones are replacing everything else, so the device itself matters more at the moment. Phone connectors matter more than any of your specific examples to the current politicians, who are responding to fears of monopolies and corporate control. Note that laptops already use mostly standard (and cheaply available) power connectors.

      Cell phones are also far more portable than TVs, so the plug becomes far more important and a bigger investment as people buy more chargers to keep in more locations. When was the last time you had to plug in your TV anywhere outside your home?

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    71. Re:US by jd2112 · · Score: 1

      When I purchased my last phone from Sprint a few months ago I was told that all of the phones that all of their phones were Micro USB and the other carriers were in the process of standardizing on Micro USB with the one notable standout being the iPhone.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    72. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      They are, but slowly. Most Android and Blackberry devices charge through the USB port, although some use the mini connector and some use the micro-mini (or whatever the buzzword is). Of modern cell phones, even in the US, the major holdout is iPhone.

      What the article doesn't make exactly clear is whether the iPad2 (assuming for sake of argument it gets a USB port) will act as a host or peripheral through the USB port. The former would be more appropriate for pulling photos off cameras. The thing is, I don't know of any examples of USB hosts (like laptops) that can be charged through their USB port. Usually they're *providing* power through that port. It'll be interesting to see what Apple implements. I suspect they'll just get an exception from the EU rule just as they have for the iphone and current ipad.

      Incidentally, being able to pull photos off the camera into Photoshop Express on a tablet is *very* interesting. That's the one capability I don't currently have on my Droid X that would allow me to leave the laptop at home. Being able to pull in photos from a digital SLR, do minor editing, and post from the field from a compact device would be a godsend. The first manufacturer that provides a solution gets my money. (All Motorola would have to do is provide support on their existing USB port for a CF reader but that appears to be impossible for some reason or other.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    73. Re:US by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Completely wrong. What is required is the installation of a specific USB driver that allows for a device to draw more than a trickle charge via the USB port. This module comes with the Blackberry suite you have to install if you want to do things like backups. The cable does not matter at all. How do I know? I had a Blackberry pearl until recently, and I charged just fine from both OSX and windows with about the half-dozen no-name mini-USB cables I have floating around. The only necessary thing was the updated USB driver.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    74. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Wow, I've never heard of this. I've had Blackberry Curve, Bold and Tour and they always charge with any generic USB cable I happen to have lying around. I don't understand why the Pearl would be different, but if so, boo on Blackberry.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    75. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like it would hurt...

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    76. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 0

      Well, this is happening in the US -- manufacturers are starting to standardize on the micro-USB -- and without government mandate. Which is how it's supposed to work here.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    77. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free markets? Where? I want the long arm of the law to govern what my options are. I have no right or freedom to choose to be unique in any way. A different style proprietary charger? Sorry, it's illegal. I can't wait till all food is legislated. One single flavor of tomato. One single type of car. It has always sucked that I can't swap out my transmission with all these perfectly good transmission that aren't compatible with my car. Besides I'm just a single cog in the working class. I don't have the right to expect that I can enjoy the variety that the ruling class enjoys.

      It's cool that I can borrow anybody's USB charger and it'll work with my phone. But, passing a law? We're such a bunch of sheep.

    78. Re:US by LarrySDonald · · Score: 1

      They already do that some. Many of the EU firmware builds are kinder on letting you access/charge without excessive need for a driver. Not all, but some. Also, the US products is already reinventing the wheel in the first place specifically to block 3rd party products. Many connectors/chargers use the same standard, only with a different plug. *All* of the USB standard plugs that won't charge off a random USB plug with working +5V/GND are intentionally not doing so - you have to intentionally break it's capability to do so by verifying the charger.

    79. Re:US by Dan+Ost · · Score: 1

      or when 95% of phones use inductive charging mats

      These mats will become the next target for environmentalists who can do math.

      Seriously, even theoretical inductive coupling efficiency can't compete with actually being plugged in and the material costs for the coils is way in excess of what's used in physical connections.

      --

      *sigh* back to work...
    80. Re:US by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      Cellphones are mobile. Once your radio or TV is plugged in, it rarely moves. Cellphones will have chargers in the car, at home, at work, cigar shop, etc. Or if you're traveling and need to buy another charger, it'd be nice to just buy a cellphone charger instead of having to find something specific to your make and model.

      It'd be nice if other devices were standardized, too, especially laptops.

    81. Re:US by kent_eh · · Score: 1

      It's even more stupid that a given manufacturer has different connectors for their different models. (I'm looking at you, Samsung)

      --

      ---
      "I can't complain, but sometimes still do..." Joe Walsh
    82. Re:US by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      Name me five laptops across different brands/makes/specs that have a standard, cheaply available power connector.
      Not just being snarky, I'd really like to know. None of the dells I've had (various inspirions) have the same power brick.

      And, of course, don't forget about the mac, with its magical magnetic connector.

    83. Re:US by adamdoyle · · Score: 1

      I wish they would do this in the US. It's dumb that each company has their own chargers.

      Sounds socialist to me. I like letting capitalism sort it out. Just like it did with CDMA, TDMA, GSM, LTE and WiMAX. Thanks to capitalism we have the cheapest and fastest wireless phones known to the world.

      I agree that it's a slippery slope but you've gotta admit it would be awesome if all phones used the same charger/data port.

    84. Re:US by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      I don't understand what the big deal is about Cellphone plugs? Every appliance I own has a different plug. My two laptops have different plugs. My Sears brand versus GE brand toasters have different plugs. Ditto my various computers (a PC cord does not fit an Amiga), and game consoles (can't use a Sony plug with a Nintendo), and portables (PSP and DS charge differently).

      What is so special about cellphones that politicians have to mandate a "standard plug" while all the other appliances use a wide variety of shapes and styles. Seems like a bureaucrat trying to justify his existence & paycheck.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    85. Re:US by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      Incidentally, being able to pull photos off the camera into Photoshop Express on a tablet is *very* interesting. That's the one capability I don't currently have on my Droid X that would allow me to leave the laptop at home. Being able to pull in photos from a digital SLR, do minor editing, and post from the field from a compact device would be a godsend.

      There is Photoshop Express on the android market. It is ok if I just want to manually adjust contrast, hue, brightness, rotate, or other simple things. It can't do auto-contrast, which I would really like.

    86. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Samsung. Every model they make has a different charger port.

      Google Nexus S by Samsung: standard Micro-USB.

    87. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have Photoshop Express for Android, and the ability to post directly from PE to various forums is very useful.

      The only part I'm missing is the ability to get the photos from the camera to the phone. For cameras with micro SD cards, you can do it if you're willing to take the phone apart to insert/remove the card, but pro cameras usually use Compact Flash, and there's essentially no way to get there from here. (Yes, I know about CF to SD adapters, but they have speed and corruption problems when used in the camera.)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    88. Re:US by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Well, this is happening in the US

      I wasn't aware that Apple is switching to the micro-USB connector.

      If I'm wrong, I'm sorry.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    89. Re:US by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      The only reason this would't work in the US is because we can't trust our lawmakers to get this right because they by definition know more about politicking than the subjects they are making laws about. And how are the EU politicians so different?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    90. Re:US by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Help incentive the industry to set their own common standard

      So the government should reward corporations with taxpayer money to get them to do what they should be doing on their own?

      I guess the meaning of "free market" is lost on most who believe that the "free market" is the solution to all our woes.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    91. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      No, you're absolutely right. Apple is the major hold-out. Apparently, selling trendy proprietary cables is still part of their business model.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    92. Re:US by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      That is not true. Some devices may work like that, but according to the USB specification as amended by the USB Battery Charging specification, the data lines being shorted together means that a device may draw current up to 1.5 A (I_DEVCHG), but the charger is not required to be able to supply 1.5A, and its voltage may drop before the device reaches 1.5A.

      The charger is permitted to source up to 5A (maximum current a USB Port is designed to safely handle), but the device is not permitted to draw more than 1.5 Amps.
      The charger must be able to source a minimum of 0.5 Amps.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    93. Re:US by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      I thought all cameras used SD card now? My brother got one of the cheaper ($900) Canon SLR camera 2 years ago, and that one uses SD card.

    94. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Pro cameras typically use CompactFlash. I think it's mostly for speed and capacity although I personally believe the CF cards are more sturdy. I shoot Nikon, and if you look at the pro bodies -- D300, D700, D3, Canon's pro bodies; EOS 5D and 7D, the high-end Sony Alpha, Hasselblad digital back, all use CompactFlash. (Ok, Sony Alpha also uses memory stick...) SD cards are typically found in consumer bodies.

      There might be a time when SD surpasses CompactFlash and the format goes away, but in the meantime, if you want weather sealing, rugged, and the fastest frame rates, you will be using CompactFlash. And at the moment there doesn't appear to be any way to get images in a CF card onto a phone or tablet, without using a laptop as a go-between. It's too bad, really. I carry a D700 because it's rugged and weatherproof, and I carry a Droid X because it's compact and relatively rugged, but if I'm going to publish photos from the field, I also need to bring along my laptop, which is neither compact, weatherproof, nor rugged.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    95. Re:US by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

      Incentivize does not have to mean hand them taxpayer money, but I guess we're into printing money for every entitlement program under the sun lately, so I can see why you'd make that mistake. There are plenty of ways to incentivize the industry to standardize without playing tax games. Think outside the box for a minute and you'll get there.

    96. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The invisible hand of the market is already doing this. I bought a new phone a few weeks ago and the vast majority the phones I looked at used USB micro. No government bureaucracy needed.

    97. Re:US by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      There are a couple of devices out there that can do USB->USB transfers. You'd just need the right cables and adapters I think.

    98. Re:US by quantumphaze · · Score: 1

      What the article doesn't make exactly clear is whether the iPad2 (assuming for sake of argument it gets a USB port) will act as a host or peripheral through the USB port. The former would be more appropriate for pulling photos off cameras. The thing is, I don't know of any examples of USB hosts (like laptops) that can be charged through their USB port. Usually they're *providing* power through that port.

      You are thinking of USB On-the-go. Full USB wiki page.

      Ever wondered what that 5th pin on the mini/micro USB port was for when the computer end has only 4? When this pin (number 4) is pulled to ground your device acts as a USB host (the pin is floating otherwise). You can buy special adaptors that give you a female USB A port to stick USB peripherals into. The only obstacles are the power supply (phones would be hard pressed to deliver the full 500mA a 2.5" HDD needs) and software (drivers, auto mount).

      If your Compact Flash reader presents itself as a USB mass storage device then it should work with most USB OTG implementations. I would suggest you wait and see if the successor of the Nokia N900 has proper USB OTG. You would get decent Linux tools to manipulate RAW files (whether a decent handset friendly GUI port or the desktop version in the inevitable Debian chroot available 5 mins after release). Can't wait? The N900 doesn't have official USB OTG (on that extra pin), but there has been decent progress on hacking it in requiring a kernel hack and making your own cable. Needless to say, this will probably void your warranty in the same way the overclocking hack it does.

    99. Re:US by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'm glad that my 25-volt, 5-amp supply doesn't physically connect to my 15-volt laptop, and that I don't have to have a big supply everywhere I take my tiniest netbook. By "standard power connectors", I don't mean "the same power connector across all laptops". Rather, I mean "power connectors that are standard, thus already widely used and available elsewhere".

      Almost all laptops I've had in the past 15 years have used some form of barrel jack. Of course every company likes to use a different particular jack, but they're mostly available through electronics suppliers like Digi-key. The connector does not pose a significant barrier to any company that wants to make an after-market part.

      Remember the good old days when computers sat on desks? All those connectors on the back (D-sub, mini-TRS, 6-pin mini-DIN, etc.) were already widely used for other electronics, and still are today. Most laptop connectors I've seen are similar examples of reusing existing jacks, and as such there's a fairly competitive market for off-brand replacement power supplies.

      In contrast, the Mac connector is (in typical Apple fashion) completely non-standard. Not only was it designed by Apple for Apple's own use, but the design is patented and not licensed to anyone. The only company that can make power cords for Apple laptops is Apple, and I do indeed see that as a bad thing.

      Within the cell phone market, most major manufacturers are using custom connectors. Those that do use physical "USB" connectors do not necessarily conform to USB wiring, to the point where one phone I used fried when connected to a real USB port, despite using a mini-USB connector on the charger. That anti-consumer behavior is what I'd like to see outlawed, and in my opinion it's a worthwhile use of bureaucrat time. Better they debate this than read the latest speculative medical research looking for things to ban.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    100. Sony do it too in some of their Sony-Ericsson phones, if you don't have Sony's monstrously bloated software sitting at the other end of the USB cable authenticating itself to the phone, it won't charge. This makes USB chargers useless, you need to either use the Sony charger or connect it to a PC with the Sony bloatware on it, and even then in some cases it may not charge properly, e.g. consistently charge to 75% or other odd behaviour. One more reason to loathe Sony.

    101. Re:US by Vastad · · Score: 1

      That said, I really wish more manufacturers would adopt the charging system from the Palm Pre - I love the idea of just popping the phone down on a flat surface and having it start charging.

      Is this the induction charging thing? Isn't it quite inefficient and slow?

      I have one of those Oral B electric toothbrushes and it uses this tech in it's cradle. Problem is I don't have a convenient setup in my rented house's bathroom to leave my cradle plugged in and mounted permanently. The toothbrush needs to be charged from near-dead (i.e. it stops entirely and gives a low moan of protest whenever turned on) every 3 weeks or so and it takes a solid 48 hours to fully charge. This is pretty disruptive for the daily brushing.

      I'm guessing the intended use is for the toothbrush to be put to rest in it's cradle in the bathroom and then induction does a top-up maintenance charge. The Palm Pre likely expects this behaviour whenever you are at your desk where the charge pad is connected. I'm just wary of that situation where a top up charge is not practical.

      How long does the Palm Pre take to charge from flat using induction? Is there a separate direct connector? Are you cut-off from third-party options like emergency chargers that suck juice from AA or AAA batteries? How is a charge pad any better when you are travelling? The other end where it plugs into a wall hasn't changed and now you need a surface to put the charge pad on.

    102. Re:US by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      but I guess we're into printing money

      The M2 money supply has not changed in the past 2 years. We are not "printing money", beyond replacement. Did you know that the federal budget deficit went down last year by over 200 billion? That doesn't fit with the "Obama's just printing money" tale that Fox likes to tell their viewers, and the rest of the media is uncomfortable about being seen disagreeing with Fox.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    103. Re:US by tepples · · Score: 1

      Then where do you try a phone to make sure that you will like it

      At a store.

      So you try the carrier-specific version of a phone in a store, and you buy the unlocked version online. I can see several problems with that:

      1. Phones for use with a CDMA2000 network such as Verizon or Sprint don't have an unlocked version that works with the same network. Unlocked phones are GSM because neither U.S. CDMA2000 carrier (Verizon or Sprint) stores subscriber identity on a removable CSIM card.
      2. Of the four major carriers, only the one purported to have the least coverage (T-Mobile) offers a discount on your plan for not subsidizing a phone. T-Mobile's "Even More Plus" plans let you buy a phone up front (or bring your own unlocked GSM phone supporting T-Mobile's band) and get a $10/mo discount on voice plans or a $20/mo discount on voice and data plans. Otherwise, you're paying a subsidy for a phone that you never get as part of your monthly service charge. This alone is reason enough for me to recommend only T-Mobile for anyone who lives and works in T-Mobile's coverage area, but that'd leave a lot of people either A. with zero bars or B. with a canceled contract for roaming on AT&T too often.
      3. If you try in one store, which has to maintain a retail storefront, and then buy from someone else that doesn't have that overhead cost, isn't that one of the things that gets customers branded "demon customers"?
      4. In May 2010, I checked three stores, and none of them have the phone I want (Nokia N900) on any carrier. Now how do I see whether the phone has a deal-killing flaw that's present in all units of the same model, such as an indistinct display or a touch screen that requires an uncomfortable pressure? E-tailers tend to charge a restocking fee for returns due to such model-wide defects.
    104. Re:US by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      No.

      I try in a store and order off the carrier website, verizon for one offers a $100 instant rebate online instead of a 3-4 week wait and hope you are approved rebate if you buy in store.

    105. Re:US by ALeader71 · · Score: 1

      My last two cell phones used micro-USB. What I want is a non-special cable multi device USB charging solution! Why should I pay extra for cables when I have perfectly good and generic Male USB-A to Male Micro USB-B format cable that I can buy in several retail stores?

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
    106. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      The problem as I understand it, put in simplistic terms, is that a USB device is either a Host or a Peripheral. For data to transfer, one of them must be Host, and one must be Peripheral. Both the camera (or flash reader) and the phone are Peripherals. So even if you had a cable to go between, nothing happens. There's also driver issues, but that's the gist.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    107. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I will look into that. At very least, when I write the manufacturer or participate on forums, I'll know what to ask for.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    108. Re:US by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Sony do it too

      No, the Nokia actually works with regular USB chargers, it's just faster with their charger (which is designed to provide more juice).

    109. Re:US by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should be mandated too?

      But a laptop is different, because the ratio (laptop size : charger size) is much higher, which means it's much less cumbersome to carry the charger with the device. My phone's charger is bigger than the phone itself, and it certainly would be a pain to carry in my pocket.

    110. Re:US by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      The device I'm describing is a host to both peripherals. This is the first one I could find but there are others too, some with screens.

      http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/434761-REG/Belkin_F5U203_USB_Anywhere_USB.html

    111. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Help incentive the industry to set their own common standard, not dictate one to them."

      I read that as "Pay them to do what makes sense for everyone, rather than only themselves." Not all of us non-conservative types think government is the answer, but we definitely believe greedy businesses to be the problem (and yes, not all businesses are greedy).

    112. Re:US by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it is listed "not in stock" or "no longer available" just about everywhere, and my small efforts to find a replacement have been unsuccessful so far. I wonder if there was a legal issue?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    113. Re:US by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I got interested so I did a bit more searching after my last post. I didn't find one with outstanding reviews and some didn't have USB 2.0 but here's a couple that are in-stock that you could look into.

      http://www.amazon.com/Memorex-TRAVELSYNC-USB-UFD-READER-32028501/dp/B000BZ4TY2/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1294097574&sr=8-1
      http://www.amazon.com/Sima-USB-101-Digital-Transfer-System/dp/B000F9LRYY/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=electronics&qid=1294097546&sr=8-1

      The second device appears to run Linux FWIW (Beowulf cluster etc)

      I wouldn't be surprised if Android could be a USB host either with the right software but it just not be possible

    114. Re:US by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

      Uh, I guess for you it's "open sand, insert head". You've crossed over from damn lies to statistics. While true in once sense, your numbers paint the rosy little picture that matches your ideology so you don't have to think. Here are some charts to help set the record straight.

      See here, and here.
      And in case you care to pay attention to our unemployment problem, which is where the government actually gets its money, see here.

  2. should by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shoulda woulda coulda. Is this actually going to have any effect on anything?

  3. Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

    The claim that iPad 2 will have Micro-USB port in TFA hinges on this:

    The most recent rumor, courtesy of the Mobile Review blog editor-in-chief Eldar Murtazin, says the iPad 2 will include a USB port. ...
    AppleInsider reports that Murtazin is a trusted insider with good sources

    That's as incorrect as it goes. He's an "editor-in-chief" of an organization that consists of precisely one person, namely him; and he is well known in Russian Internet community specifically for making wild and unsubstantiated predictions, often also claiming "insider info". The majority don't come true. So if that's the only source of that information, I would be wary about its correctness.

    That said, if EU mandates micro-USB, it would seem that Apple won't get much choice there for iPhone, and then it would make sense for them to align the rest of the line-up with it, even if the law doesn't apply there. So it doesn't take an insider to make an educated guess here.

    1. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      I know a read somewhere, who knows where... cite my sauces? nah

      That Apple will be held to this and provide basically and adapter dongle to use with the standard iPhone connector type.

    2. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it will have a forced connector that is less capable than the current connector. Thank you EU.

    3. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Apple will offer what it needs to in the EU. Apples USB2, FW efforts on their pod/pads/phones have been very strange and limited.
      Power in will not be the issue. What Apple will allow software and hardware related will be the issue.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by mad+flyer · · Score: 1

      You mean like the dock to usb wire they ship from the start ?

    5. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by neumayr · · Score: 1

      What can Apple's connector do that micro USB can't?
      I like the fact that pretty much every smartphone (except Apple's) uses micro USB. Forgettingto take along your charger doesn't really matter anymore.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    6. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Non-amplified line out for docking purposes. FM radio aerial. Does the remote control need a full USB stack? My guess would be no, there's too many spectacularly cheap chinese knock-offs for that to be the case.

    7. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by DrXym · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What Apple will allow software and hardware related will be the issue.

      It's not hard to see what will happen there. Nothing. 3rd parties that pay $$$ will get to licence limited access to whatever APIs expose music streaming, volume control etc.

      I expect by default that the change in cable will let you charge via a standard cable and preciselessly nothing else.

    8. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by am+2k · · Score: 1

      That said, if EU mandates micro-USB, it would seem that Apple won't get much choice there for iPhone, and then it would make sense for them to align the rest of the line-up with it, even if the law doesn't apply there.

      Considering that the current iPad requires more power for charging (even the iPhone charger doesn't work on it due to that), I doubt that.

    9. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The Apple dock connector does a few more things than USB. It's also a stereo audio connector, a few control pins and, strangely, a TTL-level serial interface. Exactly what that last one is for remains a mystery.

    10. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      My non-apple phone gets it's FM radio aerial through the headphone port. Which is also the microphone input for hands-free, and has the controls for same. So that's remote, headphones, microphone and antenna in one 3.5mm port. Which iStuffs have anyway.

    11. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Attach to docks and use the Apple only connector ports. If they were to use a standard like mini USB or micro USB then people might be able to figure out how to use all those iWhatever only docks with something that Apple doesn't get paid for.

      I know Apple is popular around here, but they engage in a lot of dickish behavior that harms competition and the consumer.

    12. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Informative

      What can Apple's connector do that micro USB can't?

      A great many things. The dock connector has pins for:

      • RS-232 serial (great for very simple peripherals - there was a separate RS-232 port as well on older iPods, but I think it's gone now).
      • Composite analogue video output.
      • YUV analogue video output.
      • Stereo audio output.
      • FireWire data.
      • USB data.
      • Power (3.3V, 5V and 12V DC, up to 45W).

      In contrast, micro USB has pins for:

      • USB data.
      • Power (5V DC, up to 7.5W).

      You can, for example, use an iPod dock to directly drive a TV (useful for presentations - Keynote will export for the iPod so you can give presentations without needing to take anything bigger than an iPod with you). The second audio output in the dock means that you don't need to unplug the headphones when you drop the device in the dock. I don't think the FireWire pins are connected anymore, which is a shame because that allowed simple device-to-device connectivity (and, for example, plugging in an external hard drive directly to the device without needing a computer - iPod Linux let you do this and so did some other third-party firmware).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by AVryhof · · Score: 1

      I bet they can use Micro-USB for a lot of that. I have an HD camcorder that uses it's Mini-USB port for USB data, analogue component A/V (stereo), and charging. It also has a separate HDMI plug.

      Granted that doesn't cover RS-232 or Firewire, but if they make it USB3 capable, that won't be as much of a problem, since most people probably won't use the RS-232.

    14. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      But that means you can't play the radio through the built-in speakers. At least that what happens on the older Samsung Corby. Apple's dock is on hundreds of peripheral devices such as alarm clocks, external speakers, car radios, boomboxes, etc. Not sure a single usb port would provide the same functionality without adding a lot more circuitry in the peripheral devices.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    15. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple will only allow a micro usb connector on the ipad if Steve Jobs can tell people he invented it. Also, it's AMAZING.

    16. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      RS232 and Firewire are legacy interfaces anyway. It's like having a floppy in your PC. Interesting from a nostalgic viewpoint, but except for very specialized (and unsupported) applications, no longer useful.

      Apple could use the opportunity to clean up all the old crap in the current interface and do something standard and consistent. Like, say, one USB 2.0 port and one HDMI port and call it done. But then, who would buy the elegant trendy white data cables and chargers?

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    17. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In contrast, micro USB has pins for:

      • USB data.
      • Power (5V DC, up to 7.5W).

      This is infact incorrect. Micro-USB has 5 pins, GND, VCC, D+, D- and ID. Of which you forgot to mention ID. This is used for USB OTG among other things, but there are some proprietary chips also that do things like: TTL Serial, stereo audio. Obviously it's limited to just two lines. You could argue that this isn't a industry standard, but neither is the Apple Connector.

    18. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      Nifty. They can keep theirs and add a micro slot somewhere on the holy tablet.

      I never feel sorry for Apple.

    19. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      I bet they can use Micro-USB for a lot of that.

      Sure, all they have to do is make a lot of old third party useless, and development of new peripherals much more expensive. Which would have the benefit that you could then whine about that.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    20. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Exactly - I imagine if they are forced to include MicroUSB charging they'll just add a MicroUSB port in addition to the standard dock connector. Especially on the iPad this wouldn't be a big deal - MicroUSB is TINY. There's plenty of space they could shove one. On the iPhone it might be a bit more tricky but I bet they could still squeeze it in somehow.

    21. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      The claim that iPad 2 will have Micro-USB port in TFA hinges on this:

      Apple will just throw in a proprietary connector to MicroUSB adapter to feign some sort of compliance whilst continuing to use it's own proprietary connector and charger.

      Adapter will cost 0.50 Euro, Apple will charge an additional 30 Euro.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    22. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If I understand the intent of the law correctly, it'll have to be something provided out of the box for no extra charge, and hopefully there will be no BS with external connectors - otherwise what's the point? I guess we'll see.

    23. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by mjwx · · Score: 1

      If I understand the intent of the law correctly, it'll have to be something provided out of the box for no extra charge

      But must be enforced to the letter of the law... unfortunately. Apple have almost made an art of skirting the law.

      Point in short, there is already a disparity between Euro and US prices, who would notice an extra 30 Euro. Yes there'd be some outrage but in the end, enough fanboys will relent that it would not matter.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    24. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pity they didn't make it an open standard; that connector shows up on everything these days and only works with iDevices. Sad really as Apple makes royalties off it even if it never gets used.

    25. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      The really depressing thing is that they didn't actually design the connector. You can buy them off the shelf very cheaply. They didn't design the signals that go through the pins either, they're all defined by other standards. They somehow managed to get a patent on the pin-outs of the connector. The real blame goes to the US Patent Office for allowing that - running existing protocols through an existing socket should not qualify as non-obvious.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    26. Re:Murtazin is not a "trusted insider" by samwichse · · Score: 1

      +1 for coining the term "preciseless."

  4. Recommended or Mandatory? by volteman · · Score: 1

    Is following the standard recommended or mandatory. If it's the latter, then I am not at all for it. Let demand meet supply.

    1. Re:Recommended or Mandatory? by sjames · · Score: 1

      As long as the opt out grants the consumer the right to beat the decision maker with a wet squirrel if they choose not to use the standard connectors, then fine, otherwise I'm all for mandatory. I think most people are tired of "snowflake connectors". A very carefully crafted exception clause would be OK, but would have to assure that if there was any practical way at all to go with the standard, then it is mandatory to do so.

      I have yet to see an actual device that couldn't have used a micro-USB connector.

    2. Re:Recommended or Mandatory? by fearlezz · · Score: 2

      It's mandatory. I'm not sure if it was actually a law or "if you cellphone manufacturers don't work this out, we'll make it a law"-kinda situation. But I do remember that they were left not much of a choice.

      Normally, I would agree with you: let demand meet supply. But somehow, this hasn't worked in the cellphone industry. In my company we have about 50 cellphones, all of them Nokia's. For some reason, these phones have 4 different types of charger connectors. With a simple converter cable ( http://tinyurl.com/39xhy98 ), we don't have to replace chargers that are built in cars.

      If an 8-year old adapter can be used on any nokia phone as long as you use the right converter cable, I can't think of a reason to switch connectors except for selling more spare adapters. Sure, they can improve the cable once in a few years, if they actually improve it. But I wouldn't call switching from a 2.50mm connector to a 2.45mm connector an improvement, but rather making it incompatible on purpose.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
    3. Re:Recommended or Mandatory? by jmak · · Score: 1

      Actually, the standard more or less reflects the status quo: 1) Devices which do not have USB data connection do not need to use USB for charging. 2) The phone itself does not need to feature USB-micro, it's enough to bundle an adapter to phone's proprietary connector from USB-micro.

    4. Re:Recommended or Mandatory? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      right to beat the decision maker with a wet squirrel

      You will have to upgrade wet squirel to rancid fish to get my vote.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Recommended or Mandatory? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      these phones have 4 different types of charger connectors.
      I've only seen 2 types of charge connector on nokias in recent memory (plus there are some micro USB ones now but I haven't seen one of those in person yet). Some REALLY old stuff used much higher voltages with different connectors but that was a long time ago. Got any info on the other two?

      With a simple converter cable ( http://tinyurl.com/39xhy98 [tinyurl.com] ), we don't have to replace chargers that are built in cars.
      Be aware that not all charger/phone combinations work with that adaptor. The new chargers are 5V. The older chargers had a "standard" variant that was 3.(something)V and a "fast" variant that was 5.(something), With my phone and the adaptor the old fast charger would work but the old standard charger wouldn't.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  5. Samsung Captivate by bazald · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, are they legally allowed to recess the port in such a fashion that only the official cables can reach the "standard" Micro-USB port, or is that just a mistake on Samsung's part? (It's pretty much my only gripe with the phone FWIW.)

    --
    Insert self-referential sig here.
    1. Re:Samsung Captivate by mathfeel · · Score: 2

      I have an HTC phone that has a slightly misshaped micro-USB female port that has only one wedged corner instead of the regular two corners and it comes with the a cable with a male side of the corresponding shape. This do not stop me from connecting other regular cable or micro-USB charger to the phone, but it does prevent me from using HTC's cable on other device (not that I intend to do that).

      I understand if you want to make an odd-shaped port to make people buy accessories exclusively from you. But this do not achieve that and is just kind of dumb.

      --
      The only possible interpretation of any research whatever in the 'social sciences' is: some do, some don't
    2. Re:Samsung Captivate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The standard includes restrictions on dimensions such as the one you mentioned.

    3. Re:Samsung Captivate by donatzsky · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's called ExtUSB.
      From Wikipedia:

      HTC manufactures Windows Mobile and Android-based Communicators which have a proprietary connector called HTC ExtUSB (Ext[ended] USB) which is present on the Touch Pro2. ExtUSB combines mini-USB (with which it is backwards-compatible) with audio/video input and output in an 11-pin connector.

    4. Re:Samsung Captivate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have Galaxy S, i.e., Captivate. It works with standard Micro-USB. Maybe there was something wrong with your cable/that particular Captivate.

    5. Re:Samsung Captivate by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Or maybe it's a customer-control tactic on the part of his particular telecom.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    6. Re:Samsung Captivate by omglolbah · · Score: 1

      And it is a decent idea compared to have another crappy connector on the same device.

      It works too.

    7. Re:Samsung Captivate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your HTC phone have a headphone connector? My HTC Magic has an oddly shaped Mini USB port for charging and data with 2 extra pins for stereo output (ext usb I believe it is called) I wonder if your micro usb connector is the same hence the odd shape?

    8. Re:Samsung Captivate by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I thought the HTC angled corner is because they added an audio channel... and to maintain compatability with mini-usb.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    9. Re:Samsung Captivate by perlchild · · Score: 1

      Actually the best foil to the people on the "let the market decide" is this.

      The carriers decide, then mandate the handset makers do this.

      Having a restriction on the handset makers prevents anticompetitive behaviour, one-removed.

      It's not necessarily good, but it's the best shot you got.

      The US should do the same thing, if they actually could make consumer-friendly regulation.

    10. Re:Samsung Captivate by motokochan · · Score: 1

      HTC uses a special Enhanced mini-USB port. It lets you connect headphones directly, for instance. I'm not sure why they include a special cable when a standard mini-USB would work just as well.

    11. Re:Samsung Captivate by motokochan · · Score: 1

      I have the Vibrant (the T-Mobile's variant of the Galaxy S) and have no problems with generic Micro-USB cables. Specifically, I have used the ones sold by Monoprice, and they have a huge block of plastic on them behind the plug instead of the thinness of the one that comes with the phone. Perhaps your cable is malformed in some way. Have you tried a different cable?

    12. Re:Samsung Captivate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This HTC connection supports USB+audio

    13. Re:Samsung Captivate by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      What, really? We have a Captivate and I haven't yet found a micro USB cable that didn't work with it. If you use a snap-on cover you have to take it off to charge, but otherwise haven't had an issue.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    14. Re:Samsung Captivate by bazald · · Score: 1

      If you must know, I've tried three others.

      1. The cable that came with my Kindle DX.
      2. The cable that came with my Logitech Performance Mouse MX. (This one actually can be made to fit, but it requires force and seems like a bad idea to do regularly.)
      3. An Amzer Micro USB Retractable Data Cable I bought online.

      None works acceptably, and I'm quite sure it's because of Samsung's design decision to recess the port and put a sliding door over it. It protects the port I suppose, but it causes compatibility problems as I've described.

      --
      Insert self-referential sig here.
    15. Re:Samsung Captivate by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      I'm reminded of the "USB" ports on early Macs that had an extra ridge that prevented using non-Apple USB cables.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    16. Re:Samsung Captivate by motokochan · · Score: 1

      Odd. Maybe it's just the shape/size of the casing on the Captivate. I have the same little door but haven't had the issues you describe.

      Comparisons:
      Top of the Captivate
      Top of the Vibrant

  6. And will this allow for innovation still? by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    I fully know standards for all types of things have been around for a long time, but either they were voluntary or just a number a company could work towards or surpass but with a design of their discretion. I'm specifically thinking of a company wanting to include some type of induction scheme like a soniccare toothbrush to charge their phones -- perhaps in an attempt to waterproof it without it needing to be "plugged" into a charger.

    And considering the push into smart phones and bigger and bigger batteries, will the 5 watts that USB MAY provide be enough to charge it in time? What about data transfer?

    1. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course they can, as long as they *also* provide usb-micro charging as an alternative.

    2. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by gmhowell · · Score: 0, Troll

      So, just like laws requiring someone march in front of a car, announcing it is coming, kickstarts coming with electric start bikes, and so forth. Progress, ain't it grand?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by sjames · · Score: 1

      There's no reason they couldn't inject silicone around the connector to make it waterproof and compliant.

    4. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by MartinSchou · · Score: 2

      As opposed to forcing you to buy a 30$ charger and a 15$ charger cable from every single handset producer?

    5. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      will the 5 watts that USB MAY provide be enough

      USB 2.0 is 5v at 500mA, or 2.5W. USB 3.0 allows current up 900mA, so still not quite 5W.

      It concerns me as well that some devices that could benefit from more current will be saddled with poor charging time because its easier to comply with the standard than create an exception. More likely such devices will be precluded from ever existing. Even if exceptions are provided for the inertia of compliance will probably be too great.

      There are costs to regulation, but you're not supposed to talk about that. Ever.

    6. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Those kickstart things will save you when your battery's dead. Car announcers, that is good. Imagine what that would do to both CO2 emissions _and_ the unemployment statistics!

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    7. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by jo_ham · · Score: 2

      It has always been a bit of a limitation that officially you can only draw 500mA at 5V from a USB port, especially when FireWire can provide between 18 to 30V at up to 1A or more - leading to ridiculous things like a portable hard drive that requires two USB connectors - one for data and power, the other to draw more power, when a single FireWire cable will do.

      I know apple has got around this with the dropping of FireWire support on the iPod line (and all subsequent 30 pin dock connector products) by having a "smart" USB charger that can detect the presence of an iPhone or other such device that can handle increased current on the USB connector (thus technically breaking the spec) (and I know it's not really smart as such, probably just a couple of resistors and a sensing circuit)

      Either way, it's an issue as batteries get ever higher in capacity in ever smaller devices - charging them back up is a pain!

    8. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by jrumney · · Score: 1

      USB 2.0 also allows 900mA when the port is not communicating, and more if it is a dedicated charging port.

    9. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And considering the push into smart phones and bigger and bigger batteries, will the 5 watts that USB MAY provide be enough to charge it in time?

      Barring a major development in battery technology, yes.

      What about data transfer?

      Are you proposing that USB3 is not sufficient?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by Shin-LaC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cell phone manufacturer had a chance to get it right, but for years they chose to use custom connectors and make a killing selling overpriced chargers and cables.
      Sometimes the invisible hand of the market needs a little nudging from the mighty foot of the state.

    11. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by kimvette · · Score: 3, Informative

      Camera manufacturers have been making weather-resistant DSLRs for years now (there have been well known instances where entire EOS 1Ds and EOS 7D Canon DSLR+Lenses combinations have been dunked into 3' of sea water and continued working without any problem), and they have a lot more connectors to contend with as well as a couple of microphones and speakers. It should not be difficult at all for phone manufacturers to start offering water-resistant smartphones.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    12. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by GaryOlson · · Score: 1

      You speak truth on /.? The mods will not be kind.

      --
      Every mans' island needs an ocean; choose your ocean carefully.
    13. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by gollito · · Score: 1

      true but you pay out the ass for those devices and a smartphone costs only a fraction of that. there are a few devices that are made to stand up to the elements but they typically cost more

    14. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Costing more would be fine. Professional grade DSLRs that can take that kind of beating cost more too. Often a high-end DSLR will come in consumer version and "weatherproof" version, with the latter costing more than twice as much and may even be missing a few consumer features like video. But if you're taking whale pictures on an antarctic cruise in freezing rain, it's worth the money.

      And of course, if you're not, it's not. But having the choice would be nice.

      So, a totally weatherproof Galaxy S phone, for instance, might cost $1200 to $1500. But if you're going somewhere brutal and need a smartphone, it might be worth it.

      I used to carry a military grade Motorola flipper. It was darn near bullet proof, but unfortunately a lousy phone.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    15. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1

      It is kind of amusing that the only way to get Apple to give their customers a non-Apple option is to pass a law.

    16. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Why would they want to do that? You realize that water is THE #1 killer for cell phones, right? If you've ever looked at the inside, you'll know that dropping them into water is pretty much an instant kill. The moisture sensitive strips in cell phones will also trigger if you have it in a high humidity environment, say Tennessee in the summer time. Ask me how I know this. So at $100+ a pop, why would they take away their #1 source of profit? Are you going to pay the early termination fee or just get a new smart phone?

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    17. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by loosescrews · · Score: 1

      It is not just the dark. I have difficulty in the light. In fact, I don't think I could do it in the dark. I thought that normal USB A was hard to figure out which way it should go in, but I have to say that even though Micro USB is at least not a perfect rectangle, I have much more trouble with it.

    18. Re:And will this allow for innovation still? by loosescrews · · Score: 1

      It must not have been too difficult because there are some on the market. The Motorola Defy is one such smartphone. It appears from the reviews that the cool thing about it is that along with being highly water resistant, the Motorola Defy actually excels at actually being a decent smartphone. I don't own one, but it doesn't took too bad from the reviews.

      Also, in case you forgot, smartphones typically have "a couple of microphones and speakers" built into them, as well as a camera and a headphone jack. You made it sound as if having "a couple of microphones and speakers" was unique to DSLRs. I don't think a phone work work too well without at least one microphone and at least one speaker.

  7. Micro-USB is not popular by lgftsa · · Score: 2

    In fact, I'd not seen a device which had one before a few months ago when a couple of phones started to use it. Mini-USB has been the standard for years and is only fractionally larger whilst being much stronger.

    I would suggest that that has been the primary reason for this choice - to continue the decades old tradition of delicate connectors to facilitate the upgrade path.

    1. Re:Micro-USB is not popular by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Mini-USB has been the standard for years and is only fractionally larger whilst being much stronger.

      Mini-USB does look stronger, although according to Wikipedia, Micro should tolerate more connect-disconnect cycles.

    2. Re:Micro-USB is not popular by romiz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Micro-USB is stronger one, rather than Mini-USB, or at least is supposed to. And it is designed so that it's the cable that breaks first, instead of the device.

    3. Re:Micro-USB is not popular by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The micro-USB connector itsself is more durable, but from what I've read above, there does seem to be an issue with the way it's mounted. The contact area of pads to circuit board is small, so unless the connector is properly attached with thru-pins it can snap right off the board very easily - and in tight-margin products, it's tempting for manufacturers to save a cent per device by skipping the thru-pins and just relying on the solder pads alone.

    4. Re:Micro-USB is not popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's ridiculous, the phone should break first so the customer has to buy a new one :)

    5. Re:Micro-USB is not popular by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      I have been seeing more and more microUSB over the last couple years. And micro is stronger than mini.

    6. Re:Micro-USB is not popular by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Really? My last BB had micro-USB, and my current Droid does, and my daughter's Captivate does. And someone else in this thread says that micro-USB is rated for more insertions than mini. It seems more like technology marching forward, as it is wont to do.

      I agree that we should standardize on something and stick with it for awhile. My current phone has micro-USB and micro-HDMI, and that seems to be the hot setup for this decade.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  8. About damn time. by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    This has only been obvious for about ... 10 years.

    Technologies change. But it's ridiculously obvious that they keep changing chargers so they can charge $29 bucks for a $11 piece of hardware with a new plug.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  9. Apple doesn't have to put a micro USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Apple does not have to put a microUSB port on the iphone 5 or the next iPad. They just have to offer an adapter. Seems like Apple lobbied for this exception and got it.

  10. Finally caught up to China - after 4 years by haruchai · · Score: 2

    Didn't they mandate this back in late 2006. What the heck took the EU so long?

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:Finally caught up to China - after 4 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Democracy takes time.

    2. Re:Finally caught up to China - after 4 years by nine932038 · · Score: 1

      Something similar happened in Korea, though I don't know what year. All phones use the same adapter for data and charging, or at least they did. A second, more compact standard was never created, as far as I can tell, and so all the smaller, slimmer phones come with adapters to match the (relatively) larger old standard.

    3. Re:Finally caught up to China - after 4 years by Sockatume · · Score: 2

      Coordinating a binding mandate over a union of dozens of sovereign states, including one of the world's largest cellphone manufacturers, probably takes a bit longer than doing the same thing with one country with a notoriously closed cellphone market.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  11. A step in the right direction... by calagan800xl · · Score: 1

    ..but to really compete with the Jesus Phone and his family, there need to be a standard port not only for charging but also for remote controlling and A/V output in order to create a market for non-Apple cell phone and media player docking stations.

    1. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean something like USB?

    2. Re:A step in the right direction... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you asking for regulation in the market because (insert manufacturer name) can't compete with Apple fairly? Any 3rd party (or 1st!) can make an interface for that.

      Velcome, comrade.

    3. Re:A step in the right direction... by calagan800xl · · Score: 1

      Well, USB does not seem to fit the bill... I'm just saying that I'd be happy if - among the gazillion iPod-compatible ones - there could be a choice of docking stations available to hook up my phone or PMP.

  12. Here we go again. by Sitnalta · · Score: 1

    One of two things I see could happen.

    1) Apple uses its sway (and breaks a few thumbs) in the EU so that they are exempt because they already use USB in a way.

    2) They actually include the USB port (integrated into the dock connector slot somehow) and market it as a revolutionary feature that they thought of.

    1. Re:Here we go again. by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Option is that they'll release a 30 pin dock connector to female micro-USB connector, since it is cheaper than redesigning the input boards on various iOS devices.

      And for a little flame bait, they're not far off popularizing USB, although they didn't think of it. ;)

    2. Re:Here we go again. by TyFoN · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering that they can't even make a standard mini-jack for audio without crippling to only accept their authorized accessories, I would say option 1. If they can't sway enough then option 2 obviously.

  13. Re:About damn time. by rrohbeck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is so ridiculously obvious that lots of libertarians will scream murder. Forcing a standard down our throat, oh the arrogance! I will only buy phones with a different connector just out of spite!

  14. Re:About damn time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Hi! Libertarian screaming bloody murder here. Oh, also a Mac girl. The MagSafe connector is one of most brilliant things about my Mac. I am SO GLAD that my computer has never been dragged kicking and screaming off the table when someone has walked across the cable.

    Of course if we'd standardized on the horrible AC connector that most laptops use then I'd never have benefitted from this innovation.

    Oh! Bloody Murder! How selfish is me.

  15. Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nokia must have gone down kicking and screaming...

    Even where they include the Micro-USB and have obviously paid the licensing for it, they still charge only off that confounded Nokia Mini-jack.

    1. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Nokia N900 charges through micro-usb.

    2. Re:Nokia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of all the phone manufacturers nokia are one of the best in terms of charging standards.
      Before the mini jack they had a larger one that all nokia phones could use.

    3. Re:Nokia by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      As does the E75.

      (And standard it is - I also charge my Amazon Kindle off the Nokia charger, and vice-versa).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
  16. About frigging time by DrXym · · Score: 1

    Most devices are chargable over USB anyway (if you buy the leads to do it) so it makes no technical sense that the device end features a proprietary connection. Apple and others probably do it only to sell expensive 3rd party peripherals that licence the connector. So it's good to see some sense being imposed on the market.

  17. Apple along for the ride... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APPL might need a whack on the side of the head first.
    micro / mini / whatever, get to some standard already and stick with it. The economy and people are tired of fucking round.

  18. Rated for more insertions? by MatanZ · · Score: 2

    Someone forgot to tell Nokia that. The micro usb in the N900 seems to be rated for 100 insertions, if you are lucky.

    http://slashdot.org/submission/1180314/Nokia-N900-Hardware-failure---USB-port-falling-off

    1. Re:Rated for more insertions? by quenda · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's not the fault of the actual connector. Nokia just failed to attach it to the circuit-board properly.
      It is only surface-mounted in the N900, no solder-through pins or resin.

    2. Re:Rated for more insertions? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I had the same issue with a car satnav unit. USB port fell off. I couldn't manage to reattach it with such tiny little pins, so instead I just bodged a voltage regulator to the batteries in order to keep it powered from the cigarette lighter.

    3. Re:Rated for more insertions? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have two Magellan GPS devices, one is a cheapie and the other one was spendy when it was new. The latter has a separate charging port, the former charges from USB. I'd prefer something that could charge either way but you can see where I'm going with this...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Rated for more insertions? by AlXtreme · · Score: 2

      I've had two devices where the mini usb connector broke off in the last few months, while my N900's connector still works fine after over a year of usage. I'd blame faulty production over the connector type itself.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
  19. Re:About damn time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what does anything you just said have to do with cellphone power and data connectors?

    oh right. nothing at all.

  20. So much for eco friendly by holophrastic · · Score: 1

    Once again, misusing consumer technology. Using a data-technology to transfer power, doesn't sound like it'd be very power efficient. Fine by me, capitalism works best with waste. But I still wouldn't force the inefficient standard over an efficient alternative. Good way to waste money though.

    1. Re:So much for eco friendly by o'reor · · Score: 2

      OTOH, those devices are very often seen as USB devices to plug into computers, with huge memory capabilities, therefore providing a cheap and standard way to transfer data is certainly a good idea.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:So much for eco friendly by petermgreen · · Score: 3

      Afaict 5V is about right for charging a single lithium ion/polymer cell. Go much higher and unless you use a switched mode converter you are just wasting more power. Go much lower and you don't have enough headroom to charge it properly. Most of the phone "chargers" I saw seemed to be tending to 5V output even before the use of a USB connector came on scene.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    3. Re:So much for eco friendly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      besides that, most phones offer data transfer possibilities anyway. Even for those that don't, manufacturing separate adapters/plugs could be more of a waste than having standardized equipment that becomes a commodity.

  21. Re:About damn time. by GNious · · Score: 1

    Guess you could have expressed yourself a bit better, but you are correct; This could stifle innovation and freedom of choice, but worth noting that the standard is effectively optional, and does not exclude the addition of a separate power-source.

    Now, if we could just get Apple to release the Patents on MagSafe, so we could use this for all laptop...

  22. Powermat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They could have skipped all this and gone straight for a Powermat. There was even talk of making batteries with the technology.

    1. Re:Powermat by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 1

      They could have skipped all this and gone straight for a Powermat. There was even talk of making batteries with the technology.

      Yeah, let's force people to waste energy with inductive charging.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
  23. Cradle? by Gunstick · · Score: 2

    Did they fix the position and allow easy pluggable possibilities so you can have a cradle or car adapter?

    No, of course they did not.

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  24. Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by michelcolman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm all for a single kind of connector for all kinds of devices, but... try plugging a micro USB into your phone or gps using only one hand in the dark. Now try the same with a round plug. I much prefer the latter. Micro USB seems to be much more difficult to insert, but maybe it's just me.

    1. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't be dark with a screen device but one-handed might be a challenge even in daylight. Glue a stick to the plug so the ends of the stick line up with the edges of the device? Could guide with thumb and pinky and push with index?

    2. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by Nimey · · Score: 1

      It's not just you. I expect it's hard to design a connector with size and polarity restrictions, and which is keyed so that you can only insert it one way to avoid damage.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    3. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by tokul · · Score: 1

      Now try the same with a round plug

      Nokia 1208 has two round sockets. One of headphone and other for power. Try plugging round plug and hope that you don't confuse sockets.

    4. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you doing with the other hand in the dark?

      Oh, wait. I don't want to know...

    5. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by Jakester2K · · Score: 1

      It's not just you. I expect it's hard to design a connector with size and polarity restrictions, and which is keyed so that you can only insert it one way to avoid damage.

      Might be hard to design a connector, but that's not the only solution. It shouldn't be that hard to develop a power source that can auto-polarize (tm).

    6. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Nah, lets go back to the old SCSI connectors. Those you could insert with your feet.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      But you couldn't tighten the dogs.

    8. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Steering the car :-)

    9. Re:Clumsy connector (or maybe just me) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try plugging a micro USB into your phone or gps using only one hand in the dark. Now try the same with a round plug. I much prefer the latter. Micro USB seems to be much more difficult to insert, but maybe it's just me.

      USB = "Unidirectional, Seems Bidirectional"

  25. Purely out of curiosity... by jimicus · · Score: 1

    Does the spec detail exactly how a device wanting more than 100mA of power gets it when it's plugged into an adaptor rather than a computer? IIRC, the USB spec states that such requirements must be negotiated with the computer.

    A little research suggests that this is simple - the PSU shorts the data lines, the phone recognises this and draws whatever current it needs. But AFAICT, if phone from Vendor A draws 800mA and your PSU is rated at 500mA - well, if it's been designed without any sort of protection (quite possible on a cheap & nasty adaptor) - that's the end of that.

    1. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      more than 100mA of power

      more than 100mA of current...

      Now, go write it 100mtimes on the blackboard.

    2. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 3, Informative
      if phone from Vendor A draws 800mA and your PSU is rated at 500mA - well, if it's been designed without any sort of protection and it is CE marked

      Someone is gouing to have to spend some time in cell block number 9.

      Of course, in the USA, consumers have no rioghts, because APPL has bought them all.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My Motorola Backflip uses a standard microusb port, it comes with a 5.1/850mA power charger.
      All standard car chargers are 5v/500ma - well, they will slowly tricle charge if its shut down, if its on (and if you are using it as a navigator it has to be on..) the battery will deplete.

    4. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      C'mon Slashdot. Stop modding people up for mindless Apple bashing. You could have gone and inserted "walled-garden", "DisplayPort", or anything else specific that you do or do not like about Apple. Instead, you literally said consumers have no rights because of Apple. Really?

      Isn't the point of modding people up supposed to put *intelligent and useful* conversation at the forefront?

    5. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      if phone from Vendor A draws 800mA and your PSU is rated at 500mA - well, if it's been designed without any sort of protection and it is CE marked

      Someone is gouing to have to spend some time in cell block number 9.

      Well and good, but doesn't replace my charger. Assuming the charger that blows is the one that shipped with my phone (as opposed to a universal one), I'm pretty sure it'd take at the very least the threat of small claims court to get it replaced. Not the end of the world, but a PITA nevertheless.

      Bet you anything you like the major handset vendors are still writing in their instruction manuals something along the lines of "Do not use other chargers to charge this device. Failure to follow this may damage your device, any such damage will not be repaired under warranty."

    6. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      oops, you're quite right.

      My fault for trying to write cohesive english first thing in the morning on New Years' Day.

    7. Re:Purely out of curiosity... by Tacvek · · Score: 2

      Does the spec detail exactly how a device wanting more than 100mA of power gets it when it's plugged into an adaptor rather than a computer?

      There is a USB Battery Charging Spec. It specifies how a dedicated charging port (which can be bower brick with a USB-A port, or something with a permanently attached cable) shall act to be USB compliant.

      But AFAICT, if phone from Vendor A draws 800mA and your PSU is rated at 500mA - well, if it's been designed without any sort of protection (quite possible on a cheap & nasty adaptor) - that's the end of that.

      Adapters without even basic current limiting are illegal in many countries, so in practice all adapters have at least basic current limiting. Basic current limiting drops the voltage when trying to draw more than the desired current. The cheap systems will still provide more current, but will do so at a lower voltage, so the net result is still safe. The more expensive ones will keep dropping the voltage until the device draws the rated maximum current.

      A device simply either accepts the reduced voltage, or it cuts back on the current demand to get the full voltage. All real charging circuits in phones will drop the current demand if the voltage goes too low, so this all just works.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
  26. Usage convenience for older people by bhaktha · · Score: 1

    It certainly great that a standard is being promulagted for the battery charger port. But please do remember that this does not mean that chargers are interchangeable, they might be, but manufacturers might insist using their own chargers for technical and non-technical reasons. But my main gripe is about the connector itself. It is extremely hard to almost impossible to be used by older people (that is a significant population). My parents had no problem using the Nokia connector (especially the thicker older one) but are finding extremely hard to insert the micro-USB connector to connect the charger on the new phone I bought them recently. Any thoughts/solutions ?

    1. Re:Usage convenience for older people by neumayr · · Score: 1

      My Nokia phone came with an adapter from their older chargers to micro USB. Just have them keep that adapter on their phone, hotglue it or something.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    2. Re:Usage convenience for older people by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      USB has always had a problem with which side is up. The micro USB plug shape is better in some ways than USB-A because the shape is more like a VGA connector but it is too small to see well if you use reading glasses but don't have them on so again it has a which way is up problem for those people. One thing that might help is painting a red dot on one side of the device that needs charging close to the charge port and a dot on the micro USB plug in a manner so that they line up when the plug is properly inserted.

      Another issue is less sensitive or less dexterous fingers. For this, I'd suggest setting up a corner on a counter where the device can be trapped and held still with one finger with a guide (perhaps a block of balsa wood from the crafts store or some folded cardboard} at the level of the charging port that allows the plug to be inserted with one finger sliding the plug along the guide. There might be other novel guides that could be built that eliminate the use of the counter. Just gluing some cardboard to the micro USB plug to give more purchase to rheumatic fingers might do the trick.

    3. Re:Usage convenience for older people by Froggie · · Score: 1

      Really, would it have killed them to make a connector that works either way up?

    4. Re:Usage convenience for older people by Skapare · · Score: 1

      That depends. If using their brain would have killed them, then sure.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    5. Re:Usage convenience for older people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing that might help is painting a red dot on one side of the device that needs charging close to the charge port and a dot on the micro USB plug in a manner so that they line up when the plug is properly inserted.

      It would be really funny if they decided to color code both sides of the connector with red and green dots, then color blind folks would be fucked and still insert them the wrong way. ;)

  27. Re:About damn time. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    Now, if we could just get Apple to release the Patents on MagSafe, so we could use this for all laptop...

    What I don't understand is how they got a patent on MagSafe in the first fucking place. Somewhere around here I have a cord from a waffle iron or something that is based on two contacts and a magnet. It appears to be bakelite and thus from the 1980s at the latest. The last time I knew where it was my camera's batteries were dead, because it apparently won't charge NiMH batteries from the wall wart, so I have to keep cycling sets through a charger.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  28. Hurrah! by Pugwash69 · · Score: 1

    I was surprised that my HTC phone uses the same quirky connector as my new Sony Reader. Now I find out it's a standard!

    --
    Pro Coffee Drinker
  29. Atuhenticating might be possible by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    But they still would require to allow it to behave as a standard common charger if the authentication failed.

    read point 2.5 in the MoU

    `It is recognised that certain EPSs may have the capability to recognise connection to certain Mobile
    Phones and in such cases operate outside the above specification; such capability shall not indicate
    that such an EPS is not a Common EPS `

    1. Re:Atuhenticating might be possible by leuk_he · · Score: 1

      ANd the link to to the MoU that was incorrect in my previous post.

  30. I hope they standardize driver-less charging by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 2

    Because I find it annoying that motorola phones at the very least won't charge on my PC. Sure, they've got a mini-usb connector but when I plug it in the phone complains that it's not a valid charger because I don't have some driver installed. (And I can't find the right one for Win64. My K-Rzr was like that too but I managed to find a driver for it.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:I hope they standardize driver-less charging by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I don't seem to have that problem with my work Droid.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:I hope they standardize driver-less charging by Technician · · Score: 1

      I have a Motorolla i465. It exhibits this flaw. When plugged into a Windows XP Professional PC with SP3 installed, it won't charge. If I reboot on a Ubuntu live install disk, it charges fine. It seems to be a Windows flaw. It can charge on Windows, but only with the driver or with the phone turned off. It will charge a phone that is shut off. If I need to charge off the PC, I boot into Ubuntu and surf while it charges.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  31. Re:About damn time. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Next they'll be mandating what kind of light bulbs you have to use and what kind of healthcare you are required to buy. Oh, wait...

  32. USB Battery Charging specification by tepples · · Score: 5, Informative

    and either refusing to charge or deliberately drawing less power when you detect the wrong charger.

    One could argue based on the power management portions of the USB specification that drawing less power meets the spec, but refusing to charge does not. A device MUST NOT* draw more than one unit of current (100 mA in USB 2.0) until it successfully associates to the host controller. After a device is configured, it MAY request up to five units (500 mA) but MUST NOT draw more than the host says is available. The recent Battery Charging v1.2 spec specifies a protocol on the data lines that devices can use to detect dumb chargers and chargers that can provide more power, so that devices know when they MAY deliberately draw more power. You SHOULD support manufacturers of phones and other devices that support USB Battery Charging.

    * RFC 2119 modal adverbs != shouting.

  33. Smartphones with HDMI out by tepples · · Score: 1

    I hate any non-USB interface on a phone.

    Do you also hate video output interfaces such as HDMI? A smartphone that has been connected to a large monitor to play a video could output the video using USB Video Class as if it were a webcam, but then that'd be silly.

  34. USB Battery Charging by tepples · · Score: 1

    It has always been a bit of a limitation that officially you can only draw 500mA at 5V from a USB port, especially when FireWire can provide between 18 to 30V at up to 1A or more

    This has changed. See my other comment.

    leading to ridiculous things like a portable hard drive that requires two USB connectors - one for data and power, the other to draw more power, when a single FireWire cable will do.

    Provided your computer has a FireWire port on the case. Apart from one Mac, I've never owned a PC with a FireWire port, not even the Dell netbook that I bought in 2010.

  35. Re:About damn time. by AVryhof · · Score: 1

    I have a similar connector on a 3-in-1 cook pot I bought at Wally world a few years ago.

  36. Irony about HTC by petman · · Score: 1

    It's ironic that HTC, who's not a party to the June 2009 agreement, has long standardised on micro-USB charging, but the other manufacturers are taking their time to catch up.

  37. Our current kit is standardized on micro-USB by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Both our personal phones, my work phone, and the Kindle all use the same port, so chargers and data cables are interchangeable.

    The only thing we've got that isn't is the Kodak camera, which may be mini-USB, but that's only for data transfer.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:Our current kit is standardized on micro-USB by ssentinull · · Score: 1

      Yea, its pretty nice when my friend was able to charge her phone with my Kindle cable

  38. Does only motorola do that then? by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    Because I've had 2 motorola phones, both with mini-usb ports and both required that you installed a driver or they wouldn't charge at all.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:Does only motorola do that then? by Nimey · · Score: 1

      The Droid is made by Motorola.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  39. why by andoman2000 · · Score: 1

    why on earth do they have to pick the one us visually challenged people can't easily use???? They might as well made that damn thing flat with no visual features to tell which end is up because if you don't have 20/20 vision you can't tell!!! Fuck 2011!

  40. Re: Crappy standard by rwa2 · · Score: 0

    Yeesh, this.

    Why would such a fragile, crappy connector become a standard? Is it really that much smaller than mini-USB? It's even harder/impossible to figure out in the dark which way to plug it in.

    I kinda assumed the connectors would technically get better and not worse. Especially when fumbling with the charger connection while trying to drive, just to have it fall out *again*, or connect too loosely to start charging.

    I'm not a litigious guy, but I really wish someone would outlaw the micro-USB connector, FFS. It's a freaking liability! This is terrible news :-P

  41. Wonder if it's part of the Android spec or by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 1

    something. I've got a K-Rzr and a W376g which are both Motorola phones and both need drivers to charge.I guess it could be a carrier issue though. (The K-Rzr was a verizon phone, the W376g was tracfone and both were pretty locked down.)

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
  42. Re:About damn time. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

    Standards for interoperability are fine... In this case they don't inhibit competition, and allow for more interoperability, and hence competition.

    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
  43. Re:About damn time. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

    >What I don't understand is how they got a patent on MagSafe in the first fucking place.
    >*example of prior art*

    The USPTO doesn't seem to care much about prior art these days.

  44. Bad design, the plug needs to be reversible by thisisauniqueid · · Score: 1

    It sucks that the plug fits only one way around.

  45. wish I would've known! by tkprit · · Score: 2

    I found out accidentally that LG phones standardized on micro-USB sometime within the last few years, and never looked back; family has 4 current LGs, several older ones (as backups), and they all fit the same charger. Opted out of other brands (bb esp) because of charger issue — hotel staff always have micro-USB chargers if you left yours at home.

    Good to know HTC is standardized on m-USB too. They should advertise that $hit.

  46. What this means in practice... by evilandi · · Score: 3, Funny

    An EU standard means the following in practice:

    The Germans will complain that everyone else does it inefficiently.

    The Austrians will tell the Germans how to do it.

    The Spanish will promise to do it tomorrow.

    The Greeks will fake the documentation saying they've done it.

    The Dutch will give parents and same-sex partners time off to do it.

    The Czechs will charge foreigners extra for it.

    Nobody will have any idea what the Portuguese are doing about it.

    The Luxembourgers will interview everyone else on the radio about it.

    The French will block the roads protesting about it.

    The Danes will claim to have done it a thousand years ago.

    The Swedes will only do it for six months a year.

    The Polish will blame the Romanians and Hungarians for not doing it, or doing it too much, or not quite right.

    The Maltese will earn a medal for it.

    The Irish will invest their whole economy in it.

    The Scottish will demand a subsidy to do it.

    The Welsh won't do it until it's translated into a language that only people in Herefordshire and Shropshire actually use.

    The English will do it immediately but moan about it forever after.

    Turkey will pass a law making it illegal to do it in a headdress. The rest of the EU still won't let them join their club.

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
  47. Or USB needs to be upgraded? by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    I'm no Apple fanboy - I don't even own any Apple gear, because I find them too controlling of equipment after sale. If I buy it, I figure it's mine, but Apple doesn't, so I don't buy Apple.

    That said, there's a very good technical reason Apple uses the plug they do - it's not *just* data and charge. I believe it also does analog stereo out (although you can do that with USB also - HTC phones do stereo out over micro-USB), and can even be used for video out (which I believe USB cannot - well, you could probably do a digital video stream, but not analog output), and maybe some other things.

    Point is, Apple decided that instead of putting 3 or 4 different connectors on their phone, they'd consolidate all the pins into a single small connector. Not an unreasonable technical decision. If they would just allow everyone else to use the connector too, perhaps it would make for a better 'standard' than USB.

  48. Re:About damn time. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    (waving hand) Libertarian here. Except it seems to be happening here in the US without mandate. Imagine that.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  49. Re:About damn time. by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Or, of course, you could avoid stringing the cable across walkways. The Magsafe philosophy, of protecting people from their own bad decisions, is something the government usually embraces. Maybe you should write your congressman.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  50. A victory for Win Phone 7! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Win Phone 7 has already standardized on micro-USB. Yayyyy!!

  51. Re: Crappy standard by CyberDragon777 · · Score: 2

    https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/Universal_Serial_Bus#Durability

    "The newer Micro-USB receptacles are designed for up to 10,000 cycles of insertion and removal between the receptacle and plug, compared to 1500 for the standard USB and 5000 for the Mini-USB receptacle. This is accomplished by adding a locking device and by moving the leaf-spring connector from the jack to the plug, so that the most-stressed part is on the cable side of the connection. This change was made so that the connector on the less expensive cable would bear the most wear instead of the more expensive micro-USB device."

    --
    We both said a lot of things that you are going to regret.
  52. Clumsy connector requires more standardization by spage · · Score: 1

    You're right, they're tricky to connect without peering at the cable and the equipment. USB should have mandated that the top of the plug's sleeve be flat with an embossed USB logo, and the underside be slightly curved and smooth. Then you could tell the orientation of the plug without looking (or needing Braille sensitivity to distinguish the USB logo from the manufacturer's logo with your fingertips). Secondly, the receptacle should always be mounted the same way. It's usually longer side on top, but my LG Optimus S has the receptacle upside down.

    --
    =S
  53. Overdrawing chargers by spage · · Score: 1

    Yeah, it's unclear what will happen. I thought I was being clever by getting a Bluetooth headset with a car charger that I could use for my phones, but it's only rated for 180 mA, while my HTC Evo charger is 1.0 A.

    Radio Shack's PointMobl car charger has "over current protection" and a red LED that lights to indicate USB power overload. (It also has short circuit protection, input reversed polarity protection, and a second USB port.)

    The best solution is for even dumb chargers to implement the power negotiation spec.

    --
    =S
    1. Re:Overdrawing chargers by jimicus · · Score: 1

      The best solution is for even dumb chargers to implement the power negotiation spec.

      Would require significantly more logic on the PSU than any manufacturer would stomach. Furthermore, seeing as the maximum current draw for USB is 500mA, I wonder if the power negotiation spec even allows for negotiating more?

    2. Re:Overdrawing chargers by Tacvek · · Score: 1

      No the standard USB power negotiation spec does not. The official USB Battery Charging spec on the other hand allows dedicated charging or combined data/charging ports that can supply up to 1.5 amp, and which does so through a different mechanism than the power negotiation system, that supports the common inexpensive current limiters found in many chargers. No digital logic required in the power brick.

      --
      Stylish sheet to fix many problems in Slashdot's D3: https://gist.github.com/801524
    3. Re:Overdrawing chargers by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering this for some time.

      Thing is, in order to get a sensible answer you either need fantastic Google-fu (I didn't even know there was a USB battery charging spec which went into that level of detail) or you need to post messages on /. suggesting that Terrible Things Might Happen in order to encourage people who know what they're talking about out of the woodwork.

      I chose the latter.

  54. too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this even matter anymore now that things like duracell's mygrid are available?

  55. iPod connections by DragonHawk · · Score: 1

    there was a separate RS-232 port as well on older iPods, but I think it's gone now

    Small nitpick: To the best of my knowledge, no iPod has had a separate RS-232 port.

    Unless you're talking about the interface for the remote control lump on the headphone cable. That uses a proprietary 4-pin connector next to the headphone jack. I've always assumed it was something simpler, but I suppose it could be RS-232.

    The earliest iPods came with a FireWire connector (the GameBoy connector) instead of the Dock connector; maybe that's what you're thinking of. The Dock connector replaced that.

    Also, FireWire support was discontinued by Apple some time ago. Newer iTunes doesn't recognize it, and newer iPod's don't have the circuitry.

    But I certainly agree that the Dock connector can provide way more than just power and USB. I just wish Apple wasn't so damn proprietary about it. But then, it's Apple.

    --

    dragonhawk@iname.microsoft.com
    I do not like Microsoft. Remove them from my email address.
    1. Re:iPod connections by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That uses a proprietary 4-pin connector next to the headphone jack. I've always assumed it was something simpler, but I suppose it could be RS-232

      Yup, that's the one. If you installed Linux on one of these, you saw it as a serial device, and there are instructions somewhere for connecting it up to a standard 9 or 25-pin RS-232 port.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  56. Re:About damn time. by penguinchris · · Score: 1

    I suppose you're being sarcastic, but the magsafe connector is much more useful than you apparently think it is. I've seen several laptops with broken power ports, because of pulling from side to side - and not from putting the cable across walkways (which is sometimes unavoidable, anyway). If you do anything besides sit your laptop down in one spot on a desk and never move it, you will get a lot of lateral force on the power cable.

    On my macbook pro, the magsafe connector gets pulled off frequently - pretty much any time I'm not at a desk, which is fairly frequently (sitting in airports, sitting on a couch - anywhere you might take your laptop that isn't a desk). Rather than being annoyed by this, which I would be if it was any other type of connector, I'm glad - it means the connector and the port aren't getting undue stresses and won't prematurely break (not to mention that it's really easy to plug and unplug).

  57. Re:About damn time. by toddestan · · Score: 1

    Well, the problem with Apple's standard power connectors is that they are really poorly designed. Apple does not get strain relief at all, or for that matter how to properly design the plug in the laptop. So with Apple laptops, power adapters with fraying wires, intermittent connections, and eventually a failed plug in the laptop is pretty common after a couple of years. In that sense, the Magsafe was a huge step forward for Apple, as it eliminated one of the big sources of stress that their standard power connectors were not designed to handle.

    As someone who is used to Thinkpads, the Magsafe is not a big of a deal because I've never had an issue with the power adapter or the connector in the laptop even after years of use. Though the quick disconnect if the cable gets yanked might be a nice thing to have.

  58. Re:About damn time. by JoltinJoe77 · · Score: 1

    Libertarian here as well. I will never be able to look at a government regulation against a product and translate that into the free market and competition at work. Government and free markets (and hence true unfettered competition) are usually exclusive of one another. I would say they are mutually exclusive except there is the rare case that a harmful monopoly needs a check and balance, but I don't see that as the case here.

  59. Bad design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Symmetry for USB connectors! Down with progress!

  60. overpriced genuine products by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No so you will be forced to buy the overpriced genuine product if yours fails or you get a 2nd hand phone with no charger.

  61. Try where before huge discounts on Amazon? by tepples · · Score: 1

    I try in a store and order off the carrier website

    You also said "Plus not being charged sales tax on that extra money is nice." As I understand it, online retailers such as Verizon Wireless are required to charge sales tax in any state where they have a brick-and-mortar store or warehouse.

    You also said "or get huge discounts at Amazon or wherever." Where do you try products that are sold on Amazon but not in any store near you?

    1. Re:Try where before huge discounts on Amazon? by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the $100 doesn't get charged sales tax.

      Amazon, I don't, I just buy. It's not hard.

    2. Re:Try where before huge discounts on Amazon? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Amazon, I don't, I just buy. It's not hard.

      Say you buy a product. It ends up unusably unergonomic; say there's a problem with the display, keyboard, touch screen, etc. The seller won't give you a full refund; instead it requires you to pay return shipping and will deduct a 15 percent restocking fee. Nor will it do an exchange because it claims that the product is not "defective" in its sole discretion: all units of this model have the same problem. What's the best way to do the research in the first place so that you don't end up having to pay return shipping and restocking fees on a product that ends up unusable yet not "defective"?

    3. Re:Try where before huge discounts on Amazon? by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      if it's not available at a local store, and most tech stuff isn't, reviews are your only option.

  62. A solution in search of a problem... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meh.

    The more I read this, the more it sounds like a solution to a problem that was solved over 5 years ago.

    Here's the thing. Next to nothing has micro-usb connection on the *supply* side. But, there's plenty of devices that use standard size USB connetions to supply power. (Computers, airline seats, cars, some new AC electrical outlets) To connect any of these to a micro-usb charge cable, users will need, wait for it, another adaptor. It'd be funny if it wasn't so damn pathetic. This won't help consumers charge their devices any more easily than before.

    And claims of cutting down waste and saving money by not needing to buy extra chargers?

    Let's say I buy a new smart phone. I can plug it into my old charger. Wait, no I rubber-banded it to my old phone when I gave it to my mother/father/sister/brother/sexy neighbor next door... That's ok, I'll just use the charger that came with my new phone. Wait, to "save" the company didn't include one... I guess I'll just drive to the store and buy one, because that doesn't cost anything in time, gas, tolls, store mark-up, sales/use/VAT tax, etc... Wait..

    I'm sure this legislation gives someone warm and fuzzy feelings, but let's look at this seriously, and call the EU out for legislating while drunk/stupid/etc. This solves nothing and will likely create more waste, not less.