Slashdot Mirror


Magnetic Pole Shift Affects Tampa Airport

RFSSystems writes "I thought this was an amazing and rather rare phenomenon and wanted to share. 'The airport has closed its primary runway until Jan. 13 to repaint the numeric designators at each end and change taxiway signage to account for the shift in location of the Earth's magnetic north pole.' It appears that the shifting poles have begun to affect air travel in a somewhat modest way. Could this also be the explanation for the falling/dead birds this week?" I hope the gradualists are right, but scenarios for rapid magnetic pole shift are fun to think about.

317 comments

  1. Like Bush... by mswhippingboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I don't much pay attention to poles... um wait...

    --
    Sometimes the light at the end of the tunnel is the headlight of an oncoming train.
    1. Re:Like Bush... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Like Hitler, I DO pay attention to Poles. C'mere, Poland, let me give you a big friendly hug.

    2. Re:Like Bush... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      As a stripper, the pole is my bestest friend!

    3. Re:Like Bush... by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Friends don't give friends chlamydia. -- The Pole.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    4. Re:Like Bush... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't much pay attention to poles... um wait...

      Here, now! Bush very clearly and famously didn't forget about Poland!

    5. Re:Like Bush... by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

      Ride my pole. -- From most pornos

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:Like Bush... by Exclamation+mark! · · Score: 1

      It's not very nice referring to the Polish guy as "the pole"! That is very insensitive! They're people too!

      --
      I'm a wanker.... and loving it!
    7. Re:Like Bush... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That has to be the dumbest thing ever posted to slashdot. And that is really saying something.

    8. Re:Like Bush... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MAIL FROM AC: explain your thought process behind posting that unfunny Joke or risk being a gayfag. If you choose not to, don't cry, because you have a baby dick.

    9. Re:Like Bush... by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Like Hitler, I DO pay attention to Poles. C'mere, Poland, let me give you a big friendly hug.

      I'm calling Godwin on this one.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
  2. Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The airport I work at has a second set of signage from when the gradual shift occurs in cycles, making for a 10 degree change in the direction of the runway. Ie, here it will be runway 10-28 becoming runway 09-27. Has nothing to do with birds, happens every decade or so. Ten years after that, itll be back to what it is now.

    1. Re:Happens all the time by jafiwam · · Score: 1

      AFAIK the pole is heading off to a different direction this time.

      It does wanter, and is "cyclic" in that it wanders all the time enough that it comes back to the same spot.

      Anybody thinking they are going to predict it however is mistaken or at best, lucky if they guess right.

    2. Re:Happens all the time by RKBA · · Score: 1

      I am astounded they would be orienting runways according to the magnetic poles and not the "true" cardinal directions.

    3. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Several years ago I flew into Gainsville, FL in my private plane. It was fairly early morning and quiet, about 5 miles out I received my landing clearance from the tower "LongEz 987EZ cleared to land runway 11". I scratched my head for half a second, my charts showed a runway 10-28 and 07-25, I couldn't see the airport well enough to see runway number so I assumed tower just screwed up slightly. As I approached on final I could see it was clearly repainted as 11, and confirmed this my heading was roughly 110. I thought it was interesting to see the drifting magnetic pole in action.

    4. Re:Happens all the time by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Funny

      because measuring "true" cardinal directions is so simple, compared with measuring magnetic north.

      Oh wait...

    5. Re:Happens all the time by WuphonsReach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I am astounded they would be orienting runways according to the magnetic poles and not the "true" cardinal directions.

      Maybe because a magnetic compass will (almost) always work when the more advanced instruments don't?

      How do you propose that pilots figure out what the "true" cardinal direction is as they approach the airport? While working through their landing checklist, monitoring other air traffic, weather, and everything else that has to happen before the wheels touch down?

      I guarantee they don't have time to do a star-sighting.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    6. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seeing as how the compasses in airplanes also display directions that way, it makes the most sense.

    7. Re:Happens all the time by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      It's that damn daylight savings timecube correction factor that always kills me!

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    8. Re:Happens all the time by kaiser423 · · Score: 2

      INS systems on most aircraft already due true heading and magnetic. The problem is that most itty bitty, tiny hobbyist planes don't....But my smartphone does. I can't see the technology being that far out of reach for most aircraft owners. At this point, it's more about inertia, and how big such a change would be (manuals rewritten, all airports changed, etc).

    9. Re:Happens all the time by digitig · · Score: 1

      And your smartphone software is compliant with DO178? And your smartphone is JAA certified? What model is that?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    10. Re:Happens all the time by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      How do you propose that pilots figure out what the "true" cardinal direction is as they approach the airport?

      Every tower has its own frequency. He has a book with him that he'll be looking in to get the frequency (or just ask the last tower he was talking to what to use for the next one, but that's inappropriate). Whatever he does to get the frequency for the tower of where he's going (whether memorization or looking it up) can hold the declination. It isn't hard.

      I guarantee they don't have time to do a star-sighting.

      How long have you held a pilots license? For one, even if you don't know the declination, you'll get by without problems. Why? Because the number of airports with runways separated by less than the declination is very few, and those will be large ones where you wouldn't be landing at if you didn't have something that already did the calculation for you. Just about all airports catering to small aircraft that won't have the avionics necessary have only one runway, and unless you are landing at one of the poles, you'll not get declinations above 90 degrees causing any sort of confusion. It's not that hard.

    11. Re:Happens all the time by icebike · · Score: 2

      Its nothing at all to do with inertia.

      It has a lot to do with a compass working long after your smartphone gave up because it ran out of battery, couldn't see any satellites, couldn't find any towers, and was disrupted by other instruments/radios in the aircraft.

      You presume your tiny little experience with your silly little iphone applies in the far north, in third world countries, in the middle of god forsaken Nevada, and the South Pacific.

      Its all about functionality, and knowing the runway alignment when all you have is a Non Directional Beacon and a runway alignment.

      All manuals are rewritten, as are the NOTAMs, and all runways are renumbered routinely. Its been happening for well over 60 years, and its not news.

      Your getting a smartphone seems to be the only new element here.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    12. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two reasons why that's unreasonable (not to do with inertia):

      1. A GPS enabled phone costs $150? The exact same phone, flight certified for use in navigation, would cost $3500.

      2. And aside from that, there is value to having a method of navigation that requires no electricity. Small planes always need a safe failure mode in case electricity goes out (big planes have multiple generators, battery backups, etc that small planes don't). Magnetic north is so much easier to figure out when flying at night, relying only on your small flashlight to see the instruments that still work after your alternator craps out.

      BTW, funny story, I was landing one time at a small airport in Michigan's Iron Country and the runway numbers were almost 30 degrees off true north because of the large iron deposits in the area. In fact, the variation was noticeable within the airport grounds themselves. Unless I misremember, it was the only airport I've ever been to where the reciprocal heading on the same runway was only 170 degrees off instead of 180 degrees.

    13. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't they just sacrifice a goat and pray like the rest of us on the plane?

    14. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one instrument every airplane has is a compass. True north would require electronic equipment, something that is very expensive, not required, and not used by many smaller recreational aircraft. Every pilot can tell you the difference between true and magnetic north, and it is clearly marked on every aviation map. Magnet north is simply practical.

    15. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because you've never flown a plane and have no idea how air traffic control works! Thanks of offering your well-informed opinion, though.

    16. Re:Happens all the time by maxume · · Score: 1

      Why is all that better than the airport having some paint handy and using it every few years?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    17. Re:Happens all the time by sjames · · Score: 2

      It's not a perfect pattern, but mostly it wanders within a circular region. Since the signage only has to change when it wanders far enough to one side to make a significant difference, it will naturally require a small set of alternate signs which will be reusable under typical conditions.

    18. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't need to do star sighting. A GPS (which is probably sitting there on the dashboard with the St. Christopher statue) knows which direction is true north.

    19. Re:Happens all the time by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      Barring the minor problem of the magnetic pole slowly moving, a compass is enormously more reliable than a GPS receiver. Lower power consumption, faster startup time, etc.

    20. Re:Happens all the time by parens · · Score: 1

      Actually, most ARTCC's do in fact provide frequencies during handoff.

      As per your proposal, it'd be trivial to insert declination information into ATIS - there's already an infrastructure in place that automatically broadcasts airport altimeter, weather, and NOTAMs at most airports at least regional in size, so just add "declination 3 degrees west" and you're done.

      However, I think re-designating runways just makes more sense (as KTPA is doing here). INS, radio, etc can all fail, but a simple magnetic compass just keeps going.

    21. Re:Happens all the time by Chase_Encode · · Score: 1

      If only they put magnetic declination on maps or something.

    22. Re:Happens all the time by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Even 2-seat aircraft usually have a flux compass system but this requires the electrical system to be functional.

      They still have a normal compass available should the electrical system fail.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Happens all the time by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... and also subject to aspect and inertial problems. A magnetic compass, even a fluxgate, is only useful while flying straight and level for a period of time.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    24. Re:Happens all the time by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      How do you propose that pilots figure out what the "true" cardinal direction is as they approach the airport?

      With a heading indicator, which is basically a gyroscope and keeps track of true north.
      GPS is another posibility.
      Of course one would be wise to keep a simple magnetic compass nearby for emergencies...

    25. Re:Happens all the time by BobMcD · · Score: 3, Informative

      Note that this is only true from the human's perspective. From the Earth's, it has actually traveled all the way to the other side and back, many times over.

    26. Re:Happens all the time by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      So your complaint is against the regulation, or the logic of parent's post?

    27. Re:Happens all the time by Troed · · Score: 1

      There are a few slightly different historical maps (depending on how far back you want to go) available, but this is at least a start: http://astrogeek.files.wordpress.com/2009/01/nmp_migration.gif

      I did read something about it doing regular small scale circular motions beside the long term drifting. Maybe that's what you mean.

    28. Re:Happens all the time by zeropointburn · · Score: 1

      I would propose that poster is pointing out that using your cellphone as a navigation device in an aircraft is likely to get your license to fly revoked, if not worse. Use only certified tools in flight; your life is not the only one at risk.

      --
      -1 raving lunatic; +6 subGenius... Things even out...
    29. Re:Happens all the time by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Surely spoken by a person who never had to fly a course by one...

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    30. Re:Happens all the time by jaa101 · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the runway numbers give the magnetic bearings for the runway in both directions in degrees divided by ten. If so they should always add up to 36 so maybe you mean 10-26 became 09-27.

    31. Re:Happens all the time by digitig · · Score: 1

      Yep. And there are good reasons why you shouldn't use non-certified tools.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    32. Re:Happens all the time by natehoy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Both.

      The regulations are there for a very good reason. Every airplane needs a magnetic compass on board, because in all the years of using magnetic compasses, they aren't known for running out of batteries or needing to be rebooted at a critical moment or failing because a programmer fucked up and you just crossed time zones. Electronics can easily accommodate using mag north, magnetics cannot as easily accommodate using true north. So we use the system the simplest system can accommodate easily, and the more complex systems that are MORE than capable of adjusting for it do so.

      Hobbyist planes are where professional pilots learn to fly, and most of them start out using a magnetic compass as their primary directional instrument (or at least use that as input to set a a directional gyroscope that's easier to read). That way, when the pro pilot is up there and the instrument panel suddenly goes dead in a puff of smoke, there's no reason to write off the lives of the passengers on board. The pilot knows where he's going, and this is due in part to the simple instruments that are on board, and in part to the fact that he's prepared in case this happens.

      You learn to fly using shit that don't break, then you get to play with the fancy doodads later, but you never forget how to use the shit that don't break. People's lives depend on that.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    33. Re:Happens all the time by sjames · · Score: 1

      It's just a matter of the time scale you're interested in, but yes , in the long term it has done exactly that. On the daily scale, it tends to travel in an ellipse around an average position. That average positing wanders as well. On the scale of decades it's been moving in the same rough direction for quite a while.

    34. Re:Happens all the time by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Which is why you have a directional gyro on board. The DG, which runs off very simple gizmos and is very reliable, gives you a convenient reading of direction most of the time, the compass is there as the base frame of reference (because DGs have to be reset occasionally), and just in case the DG goes kerbonk. You may only know your direction with precision when flying straight and level if the DG goes bye-bye, but you can always level off for a few seconds and get a directional reading.

      Even cockpits with all the fancy glass and such usually have a basic compass, a simple electrically-driven gyro, a vacuum-driven airspeed indicator, and a pressure-sensitive altimeter. That way, if you forgot to load software version 4.334.84.779.83.56.23885.2341a revision 12b, and the screen goes black taking all your radios and GPS and weather reporting and $18,000 hiney wipers, you know how high you are, what direction you are going, and how fast you are traveling.

      We use mag north because the simplest systems can accommodate it easily. And, guess what? The most complicated systems can accommodate it easily, too. Name me one model of GPS that does not have a selection between "mag north" and "true north".

      When flying, no matter where you are in the world, you use Zulu (GMT) because everyone always knows exactly what time it is.
      When flying, you use mag north because the simplest instruments always know where "North" is.
      When flying, you use English because every pilot can talk to every other pilot and every controller across the planet.
      When flying, you keep the simplest instruments available on board as backups to the complex stuff that breaks.

      Flyin's complicated enough. Keep the basics simple.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    35. Re:Happens all the time by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Until it dies, then you either use a compass and have to adjust for declination, or use a compass and use mag north.

      A GPS can read in mag north easily. They're complex little gewgaws with computers. Why make a pilot keep one more bit of data in his head that could potentially be inconsistent with what he's observing and make him adjust for it when the computers can calculate mag north easily?

      Maybe only a dozen or so pilots have to navigate solely off a mag compass because their glass cockpit or directional gyro went kapoof, but that's a dozen people a year who already have a lot on their plates when trying to land an aircraft after a major instrument failure. Why make that any harder than it has to be? Because we don't want to write declination adjustment software (stuff that's been in GPS receivers since the very early days of GPS) in the GPS units and fancy gewgaws?

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    36. Re:Happens all the time by thogard · · Score: 1

      The magnetic compass will work but there are some runways that should just get marked with a a big 1? as the magnetic deposits on the approach make it a mess.

      I'm wondering if its time to stop playing the magnetic orientation game with VOR. Their range now often exceeds the variance in their local area anyway and all new equipment should be reporting true direction and that will come in very handy if the poles do starting moving a great deal. This from 5 years ago http://www.physorg.com/news8917.html shows how the magnetic fields are no longer as clean as they used to be.

    37. Re:Happens all the time by Dash275 · · Score: 1

      If there is an outage on the plane, all instruments will cease functioning, with some exceptions. Most notably the magnetic compass. That way, if all goes wrong, you can still find your heading. Aligning runways in true directions would be a good solution, were it not for the fact that we'd need an electronic instrument to keep up with detection of cardinal North. Magnets require no such thing, and provide a useful tool in emergency situations.

    38. Re:Happens all the time by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      How do you propose that pilots figure out what the "true" cardinal direction is as they approach the airport?

      I learned how to set the magnetic declination on a compass when I was 8 years old.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    39. Re:Happens all the time by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I thought you were trying to say a mag compass was better because it was simple and reliable... yet you then come back with the gryo? I'm confusered :)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    40. Re:Happens all the time by dizzydogg · · Score: 1

      Compared to a digital system that requires power, working software,reception of signal from outside GPS satellites etc...
                I want a compass that works 100% of the time, even if it takes minor adjustments every decade. If you think that making things electronic automatically makes them better and more reliable, well then you really haven't been working with technology long. Having to repaint the runways every 10 years is nothing compared to the amount of work that would be necessary to completely switch all planes in the world over to full electronic systems that have 100% guaranteed redundancy or failsafes in case of equipment failure. I don't know about you but my gps gets basic roads wrong all the time, and gets confused when hills/mountains block satellite reception in rural areas, I sure as hell would not trust it to guide me through landing a 747.

    41. Re:Happens all the time by natehoy · · Score: 1

      A magnetic compass is only accurate, as you say, if you are flying straight and level. For navigation, it's more convenient to use a gyro (which is a very reliable piece of kit, but also has gyroscopic precession issues so you need to recalibrate it to the mag compass occasionally).

      Since the gyro has to be calibrated, and the mag compass is a cheap simple and reliable backup nav unit anyway, pilots use magnetic north.

      You can get as complex as you want with gizmos, but at some point in your flying career there's a chance you're going to rely solely on a mag compass for navigation. If you end up in that mode, trust me, you DO NOT want to make your calculations any more complex than you need.

      Aviation calibrates everything around your simplest instruments. For directions, this is the mag compass. The GPS can calculate mag north easily, the compass cannot calculate true north on its own. It's too simple a device, which is of course what makes it so reliable.

      When you're under complete instrument failure and things are going pear-shaped on you, you really don't need any more work on your plate. Get to straight and level for a second, now you have an accurate compass reading.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    42. Re:Happens all the time by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the magnetic north being mobile has contributed to the diversity of our species? (A bit far-fetched, I suppose, as winged species were likely a much later origin than most of the rest; but, perhaps they carried coconuts as well?)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    43. Re:Happens all the time by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      I am a certified tool, you insensitive clod, so youse me!

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    44. Re:Happens all the time by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Doc's two-seat aircraft has a flux capacitor system. It also requires the electrical system to be functional. It does not have a normal capacitor available. (Well, it probably has a normal capacitor, but not one that can fill in for triple-digit KPH temporal adjustment.)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    45. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magnetic is used so that we can use compasses while in an airplane, up north of the 60th parallel or so we use true.

      I'm a pilot and it's not really that rare for this to happen, except the airports I go to don't have the numbers painted on the dirt (yup dirt not pavement)

    46. Re:Happens all the time by TheLink · · Score: 1

      When flying, you use English because every pilot can talk to every other pilot and every controller across the planet.

      But when crashing you use French :).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayday_(distress_signal)#History

      --
    47. Re:Happens all the time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True Virgins Make Dull Company

      Well this is slashdot and your aren't dull, but I digress.

      True North +-
      Variation =
      Magnetic North +-
      Deviation =
      Compass North

      The magnetic North Pole circles the true North Pole. When you create a chart, this causes variation between true and magnetic except in a couple of places. The aircraft itself has a lot of metal and this causes interference so the deviation of the compass is measure for each specific aircraft on a regular basis. If you take a compass rose with 360 at the top and 180 at the bottom, the runways are numbered to the closest magnetic heading, i.e. if you are landing on runway 36, it has a magnetic heading of 360 (roughly as the magnetic pole continually moves, it could be 356 to 005.) This means that runway 36 is numbered 36 at its southern end and 18 at its northern end. When a pilot is landing on runway 36, he can quickly ensure he hasn't totally fouled things up by looking at his directional indicator (set from a compass heading as compasses are totally unreliable during any kind of acceleration).

      If runways were numbered to true it would cause issues as flying is always done based on magnetic headings as there is an actual measure of magnetic direction available to the pilot quite readily. Runway 31 and runway 36 are not that far from each other and if you introduced 15 degrees of variation and a strong crosswind you could end up with pilot's shooting an approach on the wrong runway particularly if we are talking about smaller aircraft and less experienced pilots. It happens all the time even now without another level of calculations that needs to be done at the busiest time in a flight.

    48. Re:Happens all the time by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Well that depends on the earth-speed velocity of the magnetic pole of course. Theoretically an African magnetic pole could do it, but not a European one. But then again an African magnetic pole is non migratory, so it wouldn't do it.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    49. Re:Happens all the time by Kuroji · · Score: 1

      No, when crashing your last words are statistically most likely to be in English: "oh shit".

    50. Re:Happens all the time by e70838 · · Score: 2

      They do. See for example https://www.sia.aviation-civile.gouv.fr/aip/enligne/PDF_AIPparSSection/VAC/AD/2/1101_AD-2.LFPG.pdf
      page 2, at the top right, VAR: 1W(05) is the magnetic deviation.

    51. Re:Happens all the time by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      So you read Erfworld, too?

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    52. Re:Happens all the time by Stuarticus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You must work for apple.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    53. Re:Happens all the time by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Can't say that I have; I just like compression in comedy. :) Checked the site briefly, saw a reference to "tool" but not the "source" -- care to explain or provide some good pointers to background/FAQ?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    54. Re:Happens all the time by natehoy · · Score: 1

      LOL! Good point.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    55. Re:Happens all the time by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      This is due to how an INS works and how it determines heading. How do you think they calculate the magnetic heading? The systems I work on have a table that calculates the magnetic variation for the location you're at, then subtracts that from "true heading," which the INS figures out by measuring the earth's rotation. There's no magnetic compass built-in on these boxes.

      How do you think your smartphone calculates true heading? Most likely by taking the magnetic heading from the internal magnetic compass then using the location service to find where you are, then doing a lookup out on the network somewhere to find out what your magnetic variation is, then approximating true heading from that.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    56. Re:Happens all the time by Stooshie · · Score: 1

      Exactly how would planes measure true north in a reliable way?

      --
      America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
    57. Re:Happens all the time by Vintermann · · Score: 1

      Like most webcomics, it's for specially interested people... in this case people interested in tactical wargames. I came across it through a somewhat dubious link on the Wikipedia page for "Archon".

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erfworld

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    58. Re:Happens all the time by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Nice, the first sentence from the wiki page reminded me of the game Paranoia, which I played way back in college. (Not sure why it reminded me of it, now that I re-read it a few times, but what the heck. :) )

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    59. Re:Happens all the time by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      It's fairly simple to bring along a handheld GPS that will give you true, rather than magnetic, heading. However, if you want to fly in instrument conditions (roughly speaking, if you want to fly in the clouds), your smart phone won't cut it. And no matter how sophisticated your electronics, they can always fail. The magnetic compass is by far the most reliable instrument in an airplane's cockpit, so in my twenty years' experience as a pilot, it's just a better idea to stick with magnetic headings, and repaint runway markings every decade or so.

      However, you are quite right about inertia, but it's the FAA that slows things down. They require very strict testing to approve equipment to be used in certified airplanes, and for something like navigation equipment, especially navigation equipment used in instrument conditions, they are particularly strict. Having said all that, most new airplanes being sold now are being sold with glass panels, so I might even argue that more and more "hobbyist" airplanes (that's a rather condescending view of general aviation, by the way, but I won't follow that bunny trail for now) are probably equipped to show true headings as well as magnetic headings.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    60. Re:Happens all the time by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      The regulations are there for very, very good reasons. As an instrument-certified pilot, I really don't want to be sharing airspace with some yahoo using the GPS on his cellphone to maintain separation from me. I've seen the GPS on my cell phone (HTC Hero running Android 2.1) showing me over a hundred miles away from where I was really at (it has shown me in Prince William Sound, off the coast of Cordova, Alaska when I was in the middle of downtown Anchorage, and it has shown me somewhere near the McNeill bear refuge when I was in my backyard in East Anchorage). You will never* see a GPS in a certified airplane off by that magnitude. I can't answer for parent, but for me, I'd argue against the logic of parent's post. With all due respect, he doesn't understand what he is talking about.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    61. Re:Happens all the time by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      A magnetic compass, even a fluxgate, is only useful while flying straight and level for a period of time.

      Wrong.

      As part of my early instrument flight training, I was taught to understand compass errors and how to correct for them in flight, including leading/lagging the roll-out in a turn due to turning errors and how to average the compass swing when flying in turbulence to get a general idea of the heading I was flying. It was a real PITA, and I'd never *choose* to fly by magnetic compass alone in actual instrument conditions, but in a pinch, it's possible. It just sucks.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    62. Re:Happens all the time by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Don't be so black and white. The world is full of shades of grey.

      A mag compass has it's advantages, namely simplicity and reliability. It also has it's disadvantages, in that it can be difficult to read in certain flight conditions.

      Likewise, the D.G. also has it's advantages and disadvantages. Although not quite as simple or reliable as a mag compass, it is still relatively simple and relatively reliable, and is much easier to read in flight than a magnetic compass.

      Electronic navigation systems, like GPS and INS are the least simple and least reliable, but also offer the most flexibility and utility. A wise pilot learns to use all the tools at his disposal, and also learns how to tell when they are lying to him.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    63. Re:Happens all the time by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Even 2-seat aircraft usually have a flux compass system but this requires the electrical system to be functional.

      Maybe in the new technically advanced airplanes (TAA), but in twenty years of flying -- half of that as an instructor -- I have not yet flown in a single airplane that had a flux gate compass. Certainly none of the old 152/172/182/206/Citabria's I have ever flown had one.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    64. Re:Happens all the time by sartalon · · Score: 1

      I actually read an interesting article a few years back suggesting this very thing, though for different reasons. The article suggested that every 30,000 years or so (disclaimer: I can't remember the exact schedule the article hypothesized) the magnetic pole would do a complete shift from north to south and during that shift, the Earth would have little to no magnetic field at all. When this happened, the earth would be vulnerable to more radiation from space that would cause a "mass mutation" do to that radiation that would temporarily accelerate evolution. Take it for what its worth, I thought it was an interesting read.

    65. Re:Happens all the time by jeepien · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that the runway numbers give the magnetic bearings for the runway in both directions in degrees divided by ten. If so they should always add up to 36 so maybe you mean 10-26 became 09-27.

      Your guess about the magnetic direction is right, but your math is terrible. The numbers do not add up to 36; rather, the difference between the numbers is always 18. So 09/27 is a possible combination, but 10/26 is not. The opposite direction of 100 degrees is 280, not 260. But feel free to chime in and contradict actual pilots whenever you have a wild guess you'd like to share with the world.

  3. I wonder by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 2

    if we'll see a similar phenomenon with the bee population as we start moving into the warmer months ahead. Perhaps it's not just a cell phone boom that was to blame last year...

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:I wonder by trentblase · · Score: 1

      Are you pondering what I'm pondering? Perhaps the cell phone boom is causing the magnetic pole shift!

    2. Re:I wonder by NevarMore · · Score: 1

      Go get a shotgun, a case of birdshot, set up an optimal test and place a lot of small dark bird sized targets in a tree. Wait for dark. Fire a lot of shots into the tree. See how many you've hit come morning.

      Yes some irresponsible gun owners can cause problems, but 1000's of birds over a few days in many locales just isn't going to add up to a few hoons.

    3. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      GOOGLE IT, but they came out with results of the Bee study. It had nothing to do with cell phones, but with disease and the way they transport agricultural bees.

    4. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dwindling bee population could likely be the result of pesticide use
      http://www.naturalnews.com/030921_EPA_pesticides.html

    5. Re:I wonder by Machtyn · · Score: 4, Funny

      Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

      Why, yes, Brain! I do think it is a bad idea to eat tater tots that were saved in my pocket from this afternoon's lunch!

    6. Re:I wonder by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      As some have postulated, it wasn't rednecks with shotguns, it was rednecks with damn big fireworks, big enough to startle/overstress the entire flock, who then proceeded to do what startled birds do, at night, and managed to slam into each other a few times.

    7. Re:I wonder by operagost · · Score: 2

      Give me some of your tots! I'm freakin' starving!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    8. Re:I wonder by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

      I think so Brain, but where are we going to find rubber sheets and that much Wesson oil at this hour?

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    9. Re:I wonder by clarkkent09 · · Score: 1

      Are you pondering what I'm pondering? Perhaps the cell phone boom is causing the magnetic pole shift!
       
      Exactly what I was thinking. An exploding cell phone would definitely cause a charming Pole to shift.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    10. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ignorant AC just wanted to insult people that live in AR. Funny thing is that the region of AR I live in has a great local economy and quality of life.

      Wal-Mart may fuck up the rest of the country's economy, but it's great living next door to their big office and the rich fuckers associated with them. No, there are no hicks around here. And yes, I'm a different AC.

      In fact, we're so smug and full of ourselves here that we feel that the entire Northwest Arkansas region should be it's own state. We have out own Wiki page:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fayetteville%E2%80%93Springdale%E2%80%93Rogers_Metropolitan_Area

    11. Re:I wonder by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Costco.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    12. Re:I wonder by icebike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sorry. But that is nonsense.

      There are rednecks and fireworks everywhere in the USA on new years eve. Yet the massive bird death was strictly local.

      The noise excuse is simply silly. It is not possible to create enough noise with a few big fireworks (or full sticks of dynamite) to kill bird over a 4 square mile area.

      Can't be done, and if it could every city an town in the US would be littered with birds.

      The most rational explanation is a large flock of birds, from somewhere possibly quite distant, were sucked aloft by a small un-noticed rural tornado or violent updraft and simply froze to death, and thawed upon landing.

      Occam's razor applies to acts of nature.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    13. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Informative -- come on mods, don't give points to people for espousing disproven theories. Cell phones had nothing to do with the bee population declining. It was an interesting theory, but unfortunately for the Luddites, it was incorrect.

    14. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amazing part is they shot them without causing any trauma, if you are accurate anyway.

    15. Re:I wonder by Chyeld · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://io9.com/5725175/why-are-thousands-of-dead-birds-suddenly-falling-from-the-sky

      They say it better than I could:

      One thing to remember is what day and time the incident occurred: near midnight on New Year's Eve. Plenty of people mark the beginning of the new year with fireworks, and it's possible these celebrations caused this nasty accident. Arkansas Game and Fish Commission spokesman Keith Stephens says the commission currently favors this theory, as fireworks that were shot off in just the right area near the birds when they were roosting could have scared them, creating a traumatic stress event.

      Why are thousands of dead birds suddenly falling from the sky?

      Obviously, birds don't usually fall from the sky when fireworks are shot off, so what would have happened here? We do know that birds tend to be more highly concentrated in rural areas, meaning one big fireworks blast in just the wrong area would have terrified thousands of birds all at once.

      This would have happened at night, when birds are roosting on the ground - and if this did indeed happen when the birds were asleep, experts say the trauma would have been enough to kill them, as the terrified birds frantically flew into each other in the heavy night fog. Witnesses have since come forward to say they saw a person setting off industrial-grade fireworks near the roosting area, which would seem to back up that theory.

    16. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does this also explain the same event happening in Arkansas, Mississipi, and (wait for it) Switzerland, all within two days?

    17. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The birds aren't the only thing you have to explain away. What about the articles popping up of marine life dying in masses as well? Surely fireworks are to blame for that, too?

    18. Re:I wonder by Sean+Hederman · · Score: 1

      As I recall the bee deaths have been linked to the EPA approving fertilizers/pesticides known to cause bee deaths despite regulations stopping them from doing so. Nothing to do with cellphones.

    19. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry. But that is nonsense.

      Agreed. Also all climate change is nonsense.

      The end of times for planet earth is coming. Birds at first suddenly lose orientation and start crashing all over. Other mammals will follow, maybe whales, dolphins. Technology starts to have trouble of the magnetic shift, that is suddenly happening much faster towards Siberia....

      So HOLLYWOOD will finally rise again!

      It's Armageddon. Oh, wait, was it The Core, wasn't it? What about a prequel, anyone?

    20. Re:I wonder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "There are rednecks and fireworks everywhere in the USA on new years eve. Yet the massive bird death was strictly local."

      Not only are there rednecks with fireworks on new years eve, but there are 20-30 times that many setting off fireworks on the 4th of july every year and I've never heard of this happening. If that was the culprit then we would have this same kind of thing happening year after year....

  4. Not rare at all by Urban+Garlic · · Score: 5, Informative

    Changing magnetic deviation due to movement of the magnetic pole goes on all the time. Runways are numbered according to their magnetic heading, plus or minus five degrees, and they have to keep them up to date, is all.

    Two seconds of googling found this comment thread discussing a different runway-renumbering from July of 2009.

    Obviously not enough airplane geeks around here...

    --
    2*3*3*3*3*11*251
    1. Re:Not rare at all by JDeane · · Score: 1

      Honestly the comments are more interesting then the article and infinity more informative as is the case with yours.

      If I had mod points I would have given you a +1 informative.

      To be honest until reading your comment I had never really given much thought about the runway numbering scheme.

    2. Re:Not rare at all by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 5, Funny

      How am I supposed to panic uncontrollably when level-headed people like you are around?

      Seriously speaking, thank you (and people like you) for being around.

    3. Re:Not rare at all by kiwidude · · Score: 1

      What about the comment in the article located on that thread that said "It'll roughly be another 56 years before we have to consider changing it again."?

    4. Re:Not rare at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could say changing magnetic deviation is as rare as mass animal die offs. Which is also quite common in history, despite what the asshole media touts and technical sites pick up.

    5. Re:Not rare at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even worse for those that would like to panic about it, the airport diagrams even list the standard yearly magnetic drift... :-) Nothing to see here, move along now.

    6. Re:Not rare at all by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      because the change variation of the variation, varies...

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mv-world.jpg

    7. Re:Not rare at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two seconds of googling

      At first I thought the Google instant search feature was bizarre, but already I've come to expect it whenever I search for something.

    8. Re:Not rare at all by stms · · Score: 0

      Why don't they switch to digital north so they don't have to keep changing all the time?

    9. Re:Not rare at all by digitig · · Score: 3, Informative

      Runways are numbered according to their magnetic heading, plus or minus five degrees

      Plus an alphabetic suffix such as "L" or "R" in the case of parallel runways.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    10. Re:Not rare at all by trollertron3000 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm a private pilot here in Tampa and I can actually see the runways from my parking garage here south of TIA (actually KTPA). They teach you this during your private pilot's course so it's known to all pilots that deviations occur and poles shift. Magnetic deviation is accounted for in your training and you use other tools to compensate.

      In fact when I fly along I'll use a chart of known magnetic deviations in the area I am flying to find true north. I also have two instruments I can use - a heading indicator and an actual magnetic compass. We set the heading indicator, a gyroscopic-based instrument, using the compass while flying straight or on the ground. This will need to be adjusted as we fly along typically, it "creeps". We use the heading indicator over a magnetic compass because trying to fly accurately with a compass is like trying to balance a unicycle. it's not easy and you chase the dial. We also use GPS but the ultimate navigation instrument for a VFR pilot like myself is a set of eyeballs, we use dead reckoning using navigation landmarks noted on charts or known to us.

      The pilots flying into KTPA will most likely be commercial pilots flying an instrument landing approach. This will not effect them much at all but the runway needed to be shut down so it could be repainted and fit into the FAA regulations. It's as simple as that.

      Not sure why I added all that. Probably because no one else did.

      --
      Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    11. Re:Not rare at all by trollertron3000 · · Score: 1

      Variations in the magnetic field are local to the area. This change effected the Tampa area.

      --
      Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    12. Re:Not rare at all by poena.dare · · Score: 2

      Just don't ask him about convection changes in the earth's core; he'll freak out.

    13. Re:Not rare at all by carpefishus · · Score: 1

      Truth takes all of the premium out of hand waving. - T. Reynolds

      --
      Facts take all of the premium out of arm waving - T. Reynolds
  5. Dead birds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that was not the magnetic pole shifting. Stop watching movies like 'The Core.'

    1. Re:Dead birds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, the dead birds and fishes have nothing to do with the magnetic poles.

      It's either aliens or another military experiment.

    2. Re:Dead birds? by BobMcD · · Score: 2

      No, that was not the magnetic pole shifting. Stop watching movies like 'The Core.'

      I hate this site sometimes, largely because I'm about to be blasted for saying this... but...

      The Core is only partially terrible science.

      PLEASE DON'T MURDER ME. Let me speak...

      The magnetic field over the earth DOES in fact shift around, and it is, at least some of the time, due to changes in the core. Also it is assumed to cause bad things to happen.

      So the premise of the film, being that the Earth's core is messed up and is causing us a bad time of it, isn't really all that flawed.

      Now the laser-worm with the bombs and all that, THAT is crap. But birds falling from the sky can and does already happen due to magnetism. Check out pigeon races and how they have to plan them around these fluctuations.

    3. Re:Dead birds? by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      Oh! You better let all the scientists know the reason the birds died, was, then.

    4. Re:Dead birds? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      If you want to watch an awful movie about the magnetic pole shifting, you'll want to watch Absolute Zero. It's truly awful, but enjoyable from beginning to end. Catch phrase throughout the movie: "Science is never wrong."

    5. Re:Dead birds? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Bird seed imported from China?

  6. Difficult to change, but not that rare. by Xocet_00 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The movements of magnetic north have, on many prior occasions, caused airports to have to redesignate their runways. Since it requires updating of all the charts that aircraft are required to carry (not to mention signage on the ground), it's often deferred as long as possible. Tampa doing this isn't really that significant, although I admit that it's kind of neat in a visual-manifestation-of-invisible-phenomenon kind of way.

    Wikipedia subsection on the subject.

    1. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      > Since it requires updating of all the charts that aircraft are required to carry (not to mention signage on the ground), it's often deferred as long as possible.

      The signage on the ground and numbering/labeling on the computer equipment is probably a pain, but if I remember my aviation science class correctly, aeronautical charts are updated yearly and commercial aircraft are required to carry the latest, so that's not really a factor.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
    2. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here's a really cool animated gif from Wikipedia, showing the magnetic declination changing over time.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    3. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You do have to pity the chaps responsible for repainting the runways of aircraft carriers whenever their orientation relative to the earth's magnetic field changes...

    4. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by Orion2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Changes to stuff like this are introduced on a cycle once every 28 days - called an "AIRAC cycle". The AIRAC is synchronized all over the world, so all the systems, charts and the like on the ground and in aircraft can be updated accordingly. Obviously there is some lead time ahead to allow for publication, distribution and update of the information and depending systems.

      Imagine if it was only once a year - every change affecting more than one airspace user or aviation service provider in the world would have to be introduced together. This would in consequence mean that you could only open a new runway, introduce a departure procedure or many more things on that date.

      On top of this there's a notification scheme for distributing info like non-functioning equipment, temporarily closed runways (for which you don't change maps forth and back), procedures to adhere, info about an airshow and the like. This is called a NOTAM - short for NOtice To AirMen.

    5. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Charts are generally updated more frequently than that, though not as frequently as the AIRAC information that Orion2 mentions. Usually, sectional and terminal area charts are updated every six months or so. As an example, the current LA sectional and TAC are good from 16 Dec 2010 to 30 Jun 2011, and are based on information current as of 18 Nov 2010 for airspace and 21 Oct 2010 for everything else.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    6. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2

      Charts are generally updated more frequently than that, though not as frequently as the AIRAC information that Orion2 mentions. Usually, sectional and terminal area charts are updated every six months or so. As an example, the current LA sectional and TAC are good from 16 Dec 2010 to 30 Jun 2011, and are based on information current as of 18 Nov 2010 for airspace and 21 Oct 2010 for everything else. All pilots are required to carry current charts with them when acting as a crew member no matter what their level.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    7. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      That is cool! Thanks.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    8. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by Phat_Tony · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of posts here pointing out that this is no-big-deal and it happens all the time, but I wonder if there's any movement to suggest it shouldn't happen? I mean, it sounds like a pain to make all these changes- maybe they should just make one change to label all runways according to true north, and to use electronic compasses on planes that compensate from magnetic north to true north, and never have to change a runway/chart again?

      --
      Can anyone tell me how to set my sig on Slashdot?
    9. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by WaroDaBeast · · Score: 1

      Well, I do pity the fool.

      --
      "The body may heal, but the mind is not always so resilient." -- Deus Ex: Human Revolution
    10. Re:Difficult to change, but not that rare. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I was being vague. I was talking about paper charts which, AFAIK, commercial aircraft are still required to carry as backups if the radio navigation units fail.

      --
      My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  7. Hollywood knows what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So we need a burrowing craft made of unobtainium and some bombs to let off in the middle of the earth.

    The crew should consist of a nice scientist, a mean scientist and a couple of young hotties.

    Plus a rousing film score, a couple of heroic moments and some ironic character arc stuff.

    1. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then we can have a non-scientist politician write a book or make a movie about it!

    2. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by spikedvodka · · Score: 1

      and don't forget the inability to pronounce the word "nuclear" correctly (Hint: It only has 2 syllables)

      --
      I will not give in to the terrorists. I will not become fearful.
    3. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by ThatMegathronDude · · Score: 1

      "Nuke-lee-ar" is still three syllables. You don't say "new-clear", do you?

    4. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by Yvan256 · · Score: 0

      Is this film was made today, you'd see men in black enter the room in the hacker scene and confiscate his bubble gum wrapper as a DRM circumvention tool, followed by outlawing the use of zeros and ones.

    5. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      "clear" is two syllables, too, though admittedly they're separated by a diphthong and by some definitions that doesn't make a second syllable.

      Perhaps you meant "nuke-leer"? Somehow, I think it's more fitting that way, too.... :) (but no, I pronounce "nuclear" as 3 syllables".

    6. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Nuke-lee-ar" is still three syllables. You don't say "new-clear", do you?

      Sure you do! At the heart of every atom, you find its newklus.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      "it's New Queue Ler" -- Homer Simpson

    8. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by CasperIV · · Score: 1

      Save some time and just give it to Michael Bay, that way annoying details like plot and character development can be glossed over and replaced with explosions.

    9. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about making it 3-D

    10. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by darkshadow88 · · Score: 1

      No. The fact that "ea" is a diphthong is exactly the reason that it's not two syllables. By definition, a diphthong is a sort of glide between two vowels within the same syllable. Since 'e' and 'a' are the only vowels in "clear", and each syllable needs a nucleus (generally a vowel), the only options are the monosyllabic "clear" (where the "ea" is a diphthong), or the (incorrect) disyllabic "klee-er" where the vowels are pronounced separately. (I tried to include IPA here, but it didn't show up in the preview, so I'm going with a phonetic approximation.)

      I have never heard of any linguist who could put forth an argument that a diphthong could somehow be split among two syllables, or otherwise split a word like "clear" into more than one syllable. If you have a source, I'd be interested in reading the argument. There have been many loons in linguistics over the years (and maybe one proposed what you're saying), but I'd like to see an argument that holds water.

      Linguistics seems to be one of the only fields that lets you say something that's wrong, add a disclaimer that "some definitions" disagree, and go on your merry way without anyone questioning it.

    11. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by blueg3 · · Score: 1

      It's actually noo-klee-er, rather than nook-lee-er, but it's still three syllables.

    12. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      "clear" may have only one syllable, but it has (at least) two moras. Also, while "clear" is written with two vowels it is not really a diphthong. If it's pronounced /kli:r/ (X-SAMPA) then it is most definitely not a diphthong. And "proper" prescriptionist English says this is the proper pronunciation. As for the more common American /kli@'/, and the British /kli@/ (X-SAMPA again) then it does become a diphthong. But not of "e" and "a". The spelling actually has nothing to do with diphthongs.

      "cake" still has a diphthong even though Americans consider it to be only a "pure" long A.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    13. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then there's the guy on the old Jaguar commercials. Instead of "jag-gwar", it comes out as "jag-yoo-arr". Hurrr?

    14. Re:Hollywood knows what to do by darkshadow88 · · Score: 1

      While there is a (nonstandard) pronunciation of "clear" without a diphthong, I was intentionally not considering it, as the point about there being a diphthong was not being disputed.

      When I was referring to the diphthong as "ea", I was talking about the lexical representation within the word "clear". If I wanted to talk about the phonemes, I would've put it in slashes.

      My point was that if you wanted to somehow interpret "clear" as two syllables, you would have to have two separate vowels in there, and the lexical boundary between the syllables would probably fall between the "e" and the "a", irrespective of the actual phonemes.

      Of course, not all diphthongs are represented by digraphs (and similarly, not all monophthongs are represented by a single grapheme). It seems, however, that the only reason the OP thought "clear" was two syllables was that there were two lexical "vowels" in the word (or that the diphthong somehow separated the syllables)--my response was a direct retort.

  8. Actually somewhat common by ASimPerson · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has happened before, and it'll happen again.

    Airport runway numbers are based off their magnetic headings with the last zero removed. So a runway that runs due south/north is 18/36 (i.e., it faces 180 degrees south and 360 degrees north - 0 isn't used). A runway that runs due east/west is 9/27. And so on. When there are parallel runways facing the same direction, the L, C, and R designations are used. A pair for parallel east/west runways are 9R/27L and 9L/27R.

    So as the pole drifts this sometimes causes runways to have be renumbered. One previous example is Reagan-National airport in Washington, D.C., where runways 1/19 and 4/22 were originally 18/36 and 3/21.

    --
    In 3010, the potatoes triumphed
    1. Re:Actually somewhat common by chrpai · · Score: 1

      One previous example is Reagan-National airport in Washington, D.C., where runways 1/19 and 4/22 were originally 18/36 and 3/21.

      I think you mean 1/19 used to be 36/18. If runway 1 became 18 and 19 became 36 that would be one hell of a magnatic drift. :-)

    2. Re:Actually somewhat common by Rary · · Score: 1

      One previous example is Reagan-National airport in Washington, D.C., where runways 1/19 and 4/22 were originally 18/36 and 3/21.

      I think you mean 1/19 used to be 36/18. If runway 1 became 18 and 19 became 36 that would be one hell of a magnatic drift. :-)

      They're generally referred to by "lower number/higher number", so 18/36 did indeed become 1/19.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    3. Re:Actually somewhat common by wondafucka · · Score: 3, Funny

      This has happened before, and it'll happen again.

      So say we all.

    4. Re:Actually somewhat common by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

      People always talk about global pole shifting, but nobody ever does anything about it!

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    5. Re:Actually somewhat common by cowboy76Spain · · Score: 1

      So, if control tower send me to runway 27/36, can I assume there are curves ahead? :-P

      --
      Why can't /. have a rich-text editor? Editing your own HTML is so XXth century.
    6. Re:Actually somewhat common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So say we all.

  9. Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 4, Informative

    Your "rapid magnetic pole shift" link is to an article about the (fairly ridiculous) rapid shift of the axis of rotation of the planet rather than the magnetic pole. The two really should not be confused.

    1. Re:Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by rjhubs · · Score: 2

      Yeah I'm not sure why Timothy felt the need to tack that on the end. The magnetic poles and rotational poles are separate entities. Conflating the two is usually just done by 2012 doomsday people who want to show the moving magnetic poles as a possible indicator of the apocalypse in our future

    2. Re:Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by Javajunk · · Score: 0

      I was thinking that. Someone got their poles crossed.

      --
      "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." Douglas Adams
    3. Re:Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by Zumbs · · Score: 1

      I guess Timothy weren't lucky ...

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
    4. Re:Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by vuke69 · · Score: 1

      Sounds kinky

      --
      Time is an illusion. Lunchtime doubly so. ~ Douglas Adams
    5. Re:Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by camperdave · · Score: 1

      The magnetic poles and rotational poles are separate entities.

      People who understand that understand that, contrary to popular opinion, it IS in fact possible to walk north from the north pole.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Magnetic/Spin Axis Confusion by mr_gorkajuice · · Score: 1

      Depends which north, from which north pole. I'm sure the popular opinion assumes that "walking north", whether meaning "towards magnetic north" or "towards rotational north", assumes that the north pole mentioned is the same kind of north. In which case, no, it's not possible.
      Or, differently put, your claim to be understanding the existance of two sets of poles is somewhat contradicted by your reference to "the north pole", as if there is only one.
      However, it's possible to be walking north even though your compass tells you you're heading south.

  10. Happens quite often by cloudstar · · Score: 2

    Its a change in magnetic variation (deviation is the discrepency in a magnetic compass due to its electromagnitic surroundings). Happens all the time. It's only when the change exceeds certain tollerances that they change the runway numbers. And those tollerances all depend on when that particular airport was last numbered.

    1. Re:Happens quite often by Ichido · · Score: 0

      Its a change in magnetic variation (deviation is the discrepency in a magnetic compass due to its electromagnitic surroundings). Happens all the time. It's only when the change exceeds certain tollerances that they change the runway numbers. And those tollerances all depend on when that particular airport was last numbered.

      Cloudstar's statement is true. We have a saying: "East is Least and West is Best". Back in the days of VORs, when plotting a course, you ADD (West) or Subtract (East) to your planned Compass Heading by the Magnetic Deviation for your flight path. Where I live, it's 7West. I haven't flown for 15 years now.

  11. Pole shift != geomagnetic reversal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The wikipedia entry linked to is talking about a shift in the rotational poles, not the magnetic poles...

  12. fun to think about? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    no, i don't like getting irradiated by the cosmic radiation, thank you very much

    we'll all be living in cement bunkers with no windows, eating mutant irradiated food farmed by farmers in radiation suits

    and in geological time, a rapid N-S reorientation will still take what, decades?

    and such a shift is still decades away, even if it starts accelerating dramatically, i think... gulp

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:fun to think about? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      and in geological time, a rapid N-S reorientation will still take what, decades?

      Don't know what 'geological time' means, exactly, but in human time they seem to be estimating 3000-5000 years for a excursion and twice that if it actually involves the core as well.

    2. Re:fun to think about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Awesome, real life Fallout!

    3. Re:fun to think about? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      utter rubbish, homo erectus lived through a few reversals just fine. There is no evidence whatsoever of reversal causing any kind of extinction, nor is the geomagnetic field the only thing that shields Earth from cosmic radiation. The solar wind interacts with the ionosphere to provide additional shielding, and that isn't going away.

    4. Re:fun to think about? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      oh yeah, there's just that massive increase in cancer rates

      what's the problem with a huge dent in our mortality, a big jump down in our life expectancy?

      nothing to worry about with a massive increase in ambient radiation, nah...

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:fun to think about? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Not a valid concern, palaeopathology has confirmed that cancer was exceedingly rare in primates until the start of the industrial revolution. Progress gives you cancer, not cosmic rays.

    6. Re:fun to think about? by number11 · · Score: 1

      palaeopathology has confirmed that cancer was exceedingly rare in primates until the start of the industrial revolution.

      Cancer tends to be an old person's disease. Not saying that the industrial revolution didn't introduce lots of new causes for cancer, but before then, primates who lived long enough to be chronologically old were pretty rare.

    7. Re:fun to think about? by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 1

      Progress mostly only "gives you cancer" because it prevents you from dying from everything else first.

    8. Re:fun to think about? by Elder+Entropist · · Score: 1

      Species can live through increased deaths and cancers, but it doesn't mean the individuals will be happy doing so.

    9. Re:fun to think about? by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/28/health/28cancer.html?pagewanted=all

      *most tumors are in soft tissue which doesn't preserve well

      *people didn't live long enough for most cancers to be very prevalent.

      "For both groups, the authors wrote, malignant tumors “were not significantly fewer than expected” when compared with early-20th-century England. They concluded that “the current rise in tumor frequencies in present populations is much more related to the higher life expectancy than primary environmental or genetic factors.”"

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    10. Re:fun to think about? by qwijibo · · Score: 1

      It's entirely possible that a dramatic magnetic shift could cause disruption to electronic services, and I'm sure that if Facebook were down for days, there are millions of people who would just die.

    11. Re:fun to think about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "utter rubbish, homo erectus lived through a few reversals just fine."

      But they lost all their iPads.

    12. Re:fun to think about? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      oh right

      because lymphoma leaves tell tale fossils

      as well as colon cancer

      and prostate cancer

      and bresst cancer

      and ANY SOFT TISSUE CANCER

      you're an idiot

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    13. Re:fun to think about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do they call it when you draw the entirely wrong conclusion because you are fixated on specific facts? I don't know, but you might want to consider that "progress" also gave us holes in the ozone, and potentially many other changes (depending on who you ask), so it's not reasonable to dismiss cosmic radiation as a co-cause of cancer rate increase along side industrialization as a whole.

    14. Re:fun to think about? by sjames · · Score: 1

      The good news is that evidence suggests that a little more radiation exposure might reduce the cancer rate. In any event, even if the shift were 'fast' and involved a period of no magnetic field, nobody you can ever meet (even a baby you meet on your deathbed) will ever know anybody who will suffer for this.

    15. Re:fun to think about? by Requia · · Score: 1

      In agricultural societies people didn't live that long, but humans at least lived long lives before agriculture came around. Typical life expectancy in hunter gatherer societies (which is most of what paleontologists that deal with human remains would be looking at) was 60.

      --
      By all means mod me troll. I'm always happy to see my enemies are afraid to debate me.
    16. Re:fun to think about? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      as it happens, there is this process known as mummification which has enabled a fascinating series of studies and scholarly papers on the subject of cancer incidence in ancient times versus now in recent years.

      You are truly ignorant and an idiot.

    17. Re:fun to think about? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      thank you for changing the subject, from paleopathology to ancient egypt

      read this einstein:

      http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/28/health/28cancer.html?pagewanted=all

      then open your ignorant mouth

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    18. Re:fun to think about? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no subject change, the field paleopathology encompasses finds from millions to mere couple thousand years ago. Natural and man-made mummies much much older than those in Egypt exist. And cancer rates found are much lower than the present. The author of your article appears ignorant of the breadth of the field.

    19. Re:fun to think about? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      hey, moron: READ THE FUCKING ARTICLE

      we LIVE longer today so we have more opportunities to catch cancer. additionally, soft tissue tumors are not preserved in fossils. you truly are a persisitent moron

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  13. Magnetic Variation Changes... Not Magnetic Pole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The phenomenon of the pole moving is essentially unrelated to this. The earth's magnetic field varies pretty significantly and "magnetic north" at very few spots actually point toward the magnetic north pole. Some parts of the US are 30 degrees off while others are 20 degrees off in the other direction. These magnetic field variances change over time as the magnetic field dances around. Since runway numbers are assigned on the basis of magnetic direction and not true, when the "magnetic variance" changes enough they have to renumber the runways and all of the procedures at the airport. This happens on a regular basis as airports are re-surveyed.

    As the airport I use hasn't been resurveyed, when I depart from runway 3 my heading is actually around 043. Many other local airports have been renumbered... but they get to it when they get to it. Not when Russia steals the north pole.

  14. Birds by rewt66 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The birds got confused by the discrepancy between runway numbers and magnetic north, couldn't figure out where to land, ran out of fuel, and crashed?

    1. Re:Birds by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      No, they were dizzy from smelling the paint fumes from repainting the designators in their nests.

    2. Re:Birds by mldi · · Score: 1

      Apparently they got so confused they all declared war on each other, since the dead birds were found to suffer from blunt force trauma resulting from repeated external blows.

      --
      If you aren't suspicious of your government's actions, you aren't doing your job as a responsible citizen.
  15. going back many years by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 0

    Funny how 10 years ago, I mentioned on /. how the poles could have a thirs axis and that was promoting for change in shifts in the poles, as well as continent changes...and I am not a scientist, but I deducted this from watching how a coin falls on a table when you spin it, if spun as well as forced into a rotation, you could actually see a thrid axis forming...before it stopped turning and fell to the table.

    I mentioned this to many climate experts , especially the ones about global warming, as I mentioned that I thought also the year was off (almost like a month off when I looked at when the change in climate happened...such as winter coming later and later, and summer seeming to last longer and longer, or that we just needed to shift or seasons ahead one month...)
    and probably as most will think, they thought this to be funny, and not even possible....and yet here is a scientific paper
    that says almost the same thing, although in much bigger words.

    I hate it when I see you go without anyone listening to you, and then later find someone else gets credit for something you had observed much earlier.

    Here is another for you, google has the new google body browser, and I sent the team lead for R&D in 2002 my idea for a image driven search engine replica of vango's body in motion, where the body had layers and based on the layer (muscle, tissue, bone, etc...) you could also filter based on body part. This was to be melded with the medicine.google.com, which was just a more detailed scientific medical journal and reference point for all doctors and hospitals, and never heard a peep.

    Looking at their body browser, i am wondering what they think they will use it for, if not for the same idea i mentioned above....i guess only time will tell.

    "dont ask me for references, cuz I was drunk when i wrote them."

    1. Re:going back many years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol wut?

  16. I lined up on a runway with a different number by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember flying into Daytona Beach Airport. It was the end of a long morning/afternoon flight (8 hours). I was cleared to land and as I lined up on the runway I had a momentary panic attack because the runway number was different than the charts. I thought I was landing at the wrong airport! The number was only 5 degrees off so I didn't think it was the wrong runway (runways generally aren't that closely aligned unless they are parallel).
    Still I was cleared to land. The tower controller wasn't having a bird or anything, and I remembered that magnetic poles have been shifting for a while.
    Found out later that they just renumbered the runway a couple days before. Either they didn't have that info on ATIS, or I missed it (and the NOTAM).
    This flight was in 1988 or 89.

             

  17. Why is renumbering necessary? by hcdejong · · Score: 1

    Sure, runways are numbered according to their compass heading, but the omission of the last digit tells me that it doesn't need to be all that accurate. That makes it unlikely that this number is used in navigation.

    I'm no pilot, but the only actual function of the runway number I can think of is the visual identification (to make sure the pilot is lining up on the correct runway). What would go wrong if Tampa just kept using the number 18R/36L?

    1. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      The pilot of the Prussian Embassy's postal Autogyro would get confused.

    2. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by Umuri · · Score: 1

      Now imagine if they can't see the runway.
      If they're told to land on runway 24, and they're going by instruments oriented 24, and suddenly the runway is 25, they'll be shooting off it after too long.
      Likewise, if they're told to land on runway 25, but they see 24 painted on the ground, they might be confused.

      Basically, i'm betting the change is because they have to go by the RIGHT designation due to instrument assisted landings where visibility is poor, and therefore are updating the visual designations so there is no cognitive dissonance

      --
      You never realize how much manually made unmanaged "linked" lists suck, till you have src.link.link.link.link...
    3. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If they can't see the runway, it doesn't matter what is painted on it.

      The lateral error is going to be far more significant than the angular error in any case.

      If they can be told how to find the end of the runway, they can be told how to line up on it regardless of its name.

    4. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      If they can't see the runway, they're going to use ILS (instrument landing system), which is far more precise and is runway-specific. With appropriate equipment, it is technically possible to land in a true zero-visibility condition, and in some cases for the plane to land itself (including flare, touchdown, nose down, braking, and stopping), but regulations have certain minimums for landing specific to each airport and require the pilot to be in manual control below certain altitudes above ground level.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      Then there is Atlanta that has 4 parallel runways. So they couldn't use the L,R, and M. I think they 'lied' about the heading on two of them.

    6. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

      Nice catch. 8L, 8R, 9L, 9R. I wonder whether these really *are* a degree off.

      Did the work for you!

    7. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      If they can't see the runway, it doesn't matter what is painted on it.

      The lateral error is going to be far more significant than the angular error in any case.

      If they can be told how to find the end of the runway, they can be told how to line up on it regardless of its name.

      Think of the repainting as a very low tech way to avoid confusion possibly for both the ATC and the pilot. Having the name of the runway be the same as the orientation of the heading of the aircraft 'might' be enough to help in some instances with runway approach that it justifies the cost. That, and it likely annoyed the crap out of some earlier significant pilot(s) who, much like grammar Nazi's, want to make sure everything is correct and had it codified into some airport flight safety standard.

    8. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      I'm no pilot, but the only actual function of the runway number I can think of is the visual identification (to make sure the pilot is lining up on the correct runway). What would go wrong if Tampa just kept using the number 18R/36L?

      It depends what you mean by visual identification. If you mean the pilot seeing the numbers painted on the runway, that is not the only function. Many airports have multiple runways at various angles to each other. When the pilot is approaching to land on a particular runway, he can fly that heading and determine the parallel runway to be the correct one on which to land.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    9. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Nice catch. 8L, 8R, 9L, 9R. I wonder whether these really *are* a degree off. Did the work for you!

      According to the AOPA airport diagram, all four are aligned to 94.4/274.4 degrees.

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    10. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by sjames · · Score: 1

      But even better, the name is the number is the instructions for finding the end of the runway.

    11. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by fordan · · Score: 1

      Phlly has the same thing with 26, 27R, 27L, all at 267.7 degrees (or 9R, 9L, 8 all at 87.7 if the winds aren't where they usually are).

      http://flightaware.com/resources/airport/PHL/APD/AIRPORT+DIAGRAM/pdf

      I suppose they might have done 27R, 27C, 27L instead, but I'm noft sure what the criteria is.

    12. Re:Why is renumbering necessary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he's headed to Siam.

  18. 2012 the year of the flip by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't worry about it though, we've survived worse magnetic pole flips.

    Of course, back then we were tiny mice and it killed off our Galaxy-traveling Sauropod overlords who forced us to labor mining Vespane Gas (which, naturally, is gone now).

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  19. As an engineer, let me suggest... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

    Build the runways on giant wheeled platforms on rails that can be reoriented to the magnetic field so that you never need alter the runways numbers.

    1. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Or just build them on compass needles and it will take care of itself.

      Or install digital readouts where the painted numbers are.

      Or paint a giant colored spot instead of a number. "Flight 234 cleared to land on Runway Cerulean Left."

    2. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must work for the government.

    3. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      As an engineer...

      ...for Microsoft?

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    4. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by Rary · · Score: 1

      Build the runways on giant wheeled platforms on rails that can be reoriented to the magnetic field so that you never need alter the runways numbers.

      And while you're at it, make one of the runways function like a treadmill, and end that debate once and for all. ;)

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    5. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by AceyMan · · Score: 2

      You do realize that the runway orientation is chosen due to things like prevailing winds and local terrain, don't you. Once you've discovered the optimal runway orientation for a site, you wouldn't want to change it. Unless, say, a mountain moved, or something along those lines.

      --
      -- Experience is a wonderful thing. It enables you to recognize a mistake when you make it again.
    6. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by sjames · · Score: 2

      Or paint a giant colored spot instead of a number. "Flight 234 cleared to land on Runway Cerulean Left."

      Damnit Jim! I'm a pilot, not an interior decorator!

    7. Re:As an engineer, let me suggest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Build the runways on giant wheeled platforms on rails that can be reoriented to the magnetic field so that you never need alter the runways numbers.

      We'll have to train our patriotic pilots to steer the aircraft after a running runway when those pesky terrorists run off with our runnable runway!!!
      We surely do not want them to win this war now, do we ?

  20. nothing new by Gripp · · Score: 1

    magnetic pole shifting is common and a well known phenomenon. it is called magnetic declination. is it so well known, actually, that surveyors have been taking this deviation into account for some 50+ years now. a tool which could be used for adjustment to such measurements is http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/geomagmodels/Declination.jsp

  21. For the airplane geeks... by alexhs · · Score: 1

    Why are we still using compass ?
    With GPS and INS, the runways could be numbered in relation to ITRF. Of course, continent drift means some renumbering will be needed, but that would be much less frequently.

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    1. Re:For the airplane geeks... by kaleth · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because not every plane has a GPS or INS. (Certified) GPS equipment is still new and expensive for airplanes. INS is very large and heavy, and only used on large commercial jets.

      And perhaps most importantly, a compass always works. If everything else fails, you still have that as a backup.

    2. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If your plane gets truck by lightning or you get some malfunction or short, you better know how to you a compass or you could just end up dead. Are you willing to forgo your compass when going hiking in the woods because you have your new fancy GPS?? I certainly wouldn't.

      As for runways, the number if you want to communicate between plane and ground control which runway you are landing. If ground control says you are landing on runway 245, you already know the heading you have to approach the airport... Hell, I'm not even a pilot and I know that! Basic flight simulator would get you that knowledge!

    3. Re:For the airplane geeks... by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Because at the end of the day you not only need to know your position but your own bearings too.

      The plane needs to know which direction it is point in. GPS's use compasses to point out a bearing for travel.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    4. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Informative

      The compass requires no electrical power.

      I fly a Cessna 172S equipped with a Garmin G1000. It's a glass cockpit that makes life much, much easier, but I still have a few analog instruments: compass, attitude indicator, airspeed indicator, and altimeter. All of them function on principles in place on aircraft for many decades now, and provide a layer of reliability in case just about everything goes wrong. I can lose the entire electrical system and still be able to fly to the best landing site available, because the compass is based on the Earth's magnetic field, the attitude indicator is based on a vacuum-driven gyro (the vacuum pump is mechanical and run by the engine), the altimeter is based on the static air pressure, and the airspeed indicator is based on both the pitot tube and the static air pressure. (The engine spark is provided by magnetos that will keep providing spark as long as the engine is turning - no battery required.)

      There are complications when flying at night, but that's why I carry a hand-held navcom radio and a couple of flashlights with me in my flight bag.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    5. Re:For the airplane geeks... by spaceyhackerlady · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because they offer the best bang for the buck. Because pilots are trained to use them. Because they work. Because aviation is totally anal about "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". This is A Good Thing.

      I'm learning to fly in Piper Cherokees, and I have a magnetic compass and gyroscopic heading indicator at my disposal. Both are accurate, but both have idiosyncrasies.

      The magnetic compass is subject to errors when accelerating or decelerating on east/west courses. It also misbehaves when turning to/from north or south. The heading indicator slowly drifts as Earth rotates underneath it. On long flights you have to periodically re-set the heading indicator.

      The pre-takeoff checklist includes setting the heading indicator to the magnetic compass, and verifying that both read correctly when you pull on to the runway. In the future Runway 01 (13 degrees) will become Runway 36 or Runway 02.

      ...laura

    6. Re:For the airplane geeks... by kaiser423 · · Score: 1

      Huh, I have a military fighter aircraft grade INS with a 2 hour battery backup packed into a 3U rackmount box right next to me that indicates it weighs 17lbs. Yea, it was expensive (low 5-figures). So are aircraft.

      My smartphone gives me true compass directions. It cost next to nothing and weighs next to nothing.

    7. Re:For the airplane geeks... by alexhs · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the answer.

      Happens that I overlook the noncommercial flight angle.
      With fly by wire aircrafts, no electricity means much bigger issues than no compass...
      However it is sound to not have a mixed system with geographical north reference for airports and magnetic north reference for smaller aerodromes.

      kaleth maks the point that INS are large and heavy. Is that true anymore ? Smartphones have gyroscopes and accelerometers now. Don't they have enough precision for flight use ?

      --
      I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
    8. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And perhaps most importantly, a compass always works.

      For values of "always works" requiring a continuously changing adjustment ;)

    9. Re:For the airplane geeks... by digitig · · Score: 1

      If ground control says you are landing on runway 245, you already know the heading you have to approach the airport...

      That would be runway 25, and you would know within 5 degrees the heading you have to approach the airport.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    10. Re:For the airplane geeks... by digitig · · Score: 1

      Because they offer the best bang for the buck. Because pilots are trained to use them. Because they work. Because aviation is totally anal about "if it ain't broke, don't fix it". This is A Good Thing.

      Somebody mod that insightful or informative, please. Best summary so far.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    11. Re:For the airplane geeks... by joaosantos · · Score: 1

      If you know where you are, have updated data and have a compass you can calculate the geographic north.

    12. Re:For the airplane geeks... by trollertron3000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yup. The compass is one of the few instruments required in every aircraft in the US. Give me a tachometer, a compass, and an altimeter and I can navigate an airplane across the US.

      GPS just recently came into the cockpit and the devices are expensive. People should realize that these are aviation instruments, so they need to be certified and are in turn expensive.

      INS isn't in every aircraft simply because not every aircraft needs to be instrument-rated. Some people, like myself currently, only fly in VFR conditions. Removing these expensive instruments saves money, as you said.

      Want to see a pilot bitch? Tell him he needs to buy something. For a great example of this search Google for the term "ADB-S requirement" and see the pilots moan about this new requirement. I should know, I'm one of them :D

      --
      Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    13. Re:For the airplane geeks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      If your plane gets truck by lightning or you get some malfunction or short, you better know how to you a compass or you could just end up dead.

      If you are flying visually, then it doesn't matter. Holding a heading (for short distances) is the same whether your equipment reads in true or magnetic directions. And if you are struck by lightning and lose most of your instruments, you'll not be flying for thousands of miles unless you are already in an airplane that cost more than most people make in their lifetime (as almost no private pilots would be crossing an ocean). So no, you won't "just end up dead" if you lose all your non-compass instruments unless you are already flying past your abilities or are in severely adverse conditions.

      Are you willing to forgo your compass when going hiking in the woods because you have your new fancy GPS?? I certainly wouldn't.

      Last time I went out on a multi-day hike, I took neither. Among the group, there was one GPS and no compasses. Unless you are hiking cross-country without any trails at all, you'd have to be a moron to get lost, even with no map and compass. And you sound like the Amish. They are allowed to use horse-powered vehicles, but not engine-powered ones. You assert that the tech of a map and compass is acceptable but GPS isn't. Nice arbitrary line to draw. Whatever tech you like, and no more. That's so hypocritical...

    14. Re:For the airplane geeks... by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huh, I have a military fighter aircraft grade INS with a 2 hour battery backup packed into a 3U rackmount box right next to me that indicates it weighs 17lbs. Yea, it was expensive (low 5-figures). So are aircraft.

      Many aircraft cost in the mid-to-high 5-figures. Adding 10-20% to a private plane's cost, or double that if you want redundancy, seems excessive when the only benefit is some geek's sense of correctness. Adding 6U worth of rack equipment isn't exactly easy either - space can be quite tight up there as it is.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    15. Re:For the airplane geeks... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      And you sound like the Amish. They are allowed to use horse-powered vehicles, but not engine-powered ones. You assert that the tech of a map and compass is acceptable but GPS isn't. Nice arbitrary line to draw. Whatever tech you like, and no more. That's so hypocritical...

      When's the last time you had a traditional compass break? When's the last time you were in a situation when you desperately needed to navigate properly to increase the survival chances of others, and a compass wouldn't have helped? How often have you left all compasses behind because they were too big/heavy for your vehicle? Considering the relative inexpensiveness of compasses, requiring them seems like a no-brainer to me.

      That calculation, applied to GPS devices, in situations when you already have a compass, is far from as compelling.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    16. Re:For the airplane geeks... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      A compas won't give you the real North, but the latest GPS will give you the magnetic North. See, there is one option that everybody will like, and another one that not-everybody will like...

    17. Re:For the airplane geeks... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Try doing that while landing a small plane.

      Anyway, why is everybody so concerned about using the magnetic north? The airports (the most affected) don't seem to care about that, and the pilots like that way. Why would anybody else care?

    18. Re:For the airplane geeks... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      There is no way to use a mixed system. The numbers are written as big as they can be, there are signs just after them, there is no space left for other numbers.

    19. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GPS does not tell you which way the aircraft is heading. It only tells you which way the aircraft is tracking, relative to the ground. INS will tell you true heading, but it's heavy and expensive .... for general aviation aircraft worth $20K (less than a new pickup) it doesn't make snese to mandate a $10K piece of electronics.

      contrary to common misconceptions, most pilots in the US aren't rich; they're middle class and spend less on their hobby then the average person with a ski boat. However, the government is trying its hardest to make this like europe, where only the rich can afford to fly.

    20. Re:For the airplane geeks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you had a traditional compass break?

      When's the last time you had a GPS "break" (not including things like running out of batteries and not having extras)?

      When's the last time you were in a situation when you desperately needed to navigate properly to increase the survival chances of others, and a compass wouldn't have helped?

      Never. Common sense (listen for sounds, go to them, and if it's water, go downstream, if it's not water, it's probably a person or machinery) goes much much further than having a compass. Sure, a compass could help, but it's less useful than a GPS and almost never required to increase the chance of survival.

      How often have you left all compasses behind because they were too big/heavy for your vehicle?

      Vehicle? There's nothing I've ever left behind because it was too heavy for the vehicle. Now, I leave almost everything out of my pack because I like my pack lighter rather than heavier. But that's not a vehicle, so I'm not sure what you are referring to. And yes, I leave the compass out when doing 50+ miles over three days because of the weight. It isn't much, but it gains me nothing, so it's still excess weight. The same reason I don't take my TV remote with me even though it weighs about the same.

      That calculation, applied to GPS devices, in situations when you already have a compass, is far from as compelling.

      A compass alone is almost completely useless. Look at the stars or the sun or for moss or something and you'll get an idea of north. That's "good enough" for almost all cases. A compass would be much better for precision orienteering, but if it's the life and death cases that are implied here, you don't need to find a particular spot, but to go a general direction until you find help. And a compass for that is overkill if you have half a brain for all the same reasons you assert a GPS is overkill if you have a compass. Add to that most people don't know how to properly use a compass, and they are more like having a crutch with them that's broken and they won't know until they need it. With a GPS, if you think you can work it, you generally can. It's not a skill people greatly overestimate, like their orienteering skills.

    21. Re:For the airplane geeks... by brec · · Score: 1

      Correcting a typo, for those who actually want to Google the example: ADS-B requirement

    22. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Martin+Blank · · Score: 2

      Flight is not generally as precise as many people think. Extreme precision is required on take-off and landing, and is not as critical in most other phases. In fact, intrument error traditionally provided a certain margin of safety in flight. Charts have for years now contained a warning regarding waypoints:

      CAUTION: GPS accuracy necessitates extra vigilance for other aircraft when navigating near any fix retrieved from a GPS database.

      Basically, the planes fly so precisely using GPS coordinates, and especially when using GPS-based autopilots, that there's an increased proximity danger at waypoints, which may include airports.

      Flying purely by hand, or even on instruments that have known error ranges, there is a safety margin because of the slop. Flying purely by precision instruments improves efficiency and some safety factors, but requires knowledge of the limitations as well.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    23. Re:For the airplane geeks... by jp102235 · · Score: 1

      the last time my gps didn't work was in the middle east - it is by far not reliable enough to be used without an INS. And is suscetiple to 'interference' from many sources.

      Instrument flying is based on rules determined by blood: almost every rule is because someone bit the big one for relying on something they should not have.

      Basics of flight: pitch/roll heading/altitude, everything else (except the landing) is gravy
      Back on topic: True headings ARE used, I believe above the artic circle - as mag gets confused up close to the poles.
      j

      --
      jp
    24. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adding 6U worth of rack equipment isn't exactly easy either - space can be quite tight up there as it is.

      As a small aircraft mechanic, I can confirm this. I've worked in a few planes where the only way to fit a GPS in the panel would be to take out something else. One didn't even have room to yoke-mount a portable GPS* without blocking other instruments (granted, they were trying to cram one of those big 7" ones in there).

      Installing a panel-mounted GPS in a plane can easily cost $10-15,000. Aviation parts are expensive, and installation is a bitch, particularly in older planes. Given that a lot of 4-seat Cessnas and Pipers are going for $20-40,000 used, I'm actually surprised at how many have had panel-mounted GPS units installed.

      *Not legally usable for navigation under instrument flight rules (IFR), but still useful for situational awareness and VFR flying. And they are much, much cheaper and usually more capable than an IFR-certified GPS unit. A Garmin GPSMAP 696" makes a GNS-430W look like an overpriced boat anchor in comparison.

    25. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a pilot you should know that an INS is not required equipment for an aircraft filing IFR.

    26. Re:For the airplane geeks... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      When's the last time you had a GPS "break" (not including things like running out of batteries and not having extras)?

      You HAVE to include things like running out of batteries. That's the point of having the compass (and a physical map).

      When it gets very cold, batteries often don't work so well, and the humans often stop working so well too. Not a good combination.

      A decent compass and map will continue working even if it's cold enough to freeze your GPS screen.

      If you're wandering about in a big dense city a GPS+map is better than a compass. If you're wandering around in the "wilds", you better have a compass and "hard copy map" as backup.

      --
    27. Re:For the airplane geeks... by muntis · · Score: 1

      GPS is not used because is expensive but because system owned by US military. You can't expect all civilian airplanes in world to rely on system owned by one govement.

    28. Re:For the airplane geeks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      You HAVE to include things like running out of batteries.

      If you include user error, you have to state that maps don't work because the user grabbed the wrong one or accidentally burned it to get the fire started. So, when I assume competence, you reply that competence can't be assumed. When you make that assumption, then piles of silliness are opened up.

      When it gets very cold, batteries often don't work so well, and the humans often stop working so well too. Not a good combination.

      See, a physical map is better because you can burn it when it's so cold you can't function.

      If you're wandering about in a big dense city a GPS+map is better than a compass. If you're wandering around in the "wilds", you better have a compass and "hard copy map" as backup.

      And where do you propose this "wilds" is? Most of the people in the US could leave their house and walk for two days in any direction and not reach a place without cellular coverage. And even if found, a compass and a map for those majority of Americans would do them as much good as an Ouija board. But the GPS they can manage. Why not tell them to take a sextant because the maps are paper and can get easily damaged? Both are as useful to the average American.

    29. Re:For the airplane geeks... by trollertron3000 · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm a VFR pilot. There is no FAA regulation that states I need to know that. How ya like them apples smarty pants?

      --
      Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
    30. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

      You don't need a military-grade INS in a small private aircraft. A commercial-grade system with less accurate sensors would suffice, especially if they have GPS integrated. You're still looking at a few thousand dollars, though.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    31. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Low 5 figures is about the entire cost of my aircraft. Also there isn't space for anything 3U sized without having one fewer seats. 17lbs is an overnight bag I can no longer take.

      About 90% of registered aircraft weigh less than two metric tonnes and have four or fewer seats.

    32. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      You missed one.

      When within the boundaries of a controlled airport, the compass GUARANTEES that every plane agrees on what the heading is. When ATC tells you to take a heading of 20 degrees, he needs to know that your 20 degrees is the same as his 20 degrees. All the compasses within the area will be under the same magnetic flux, and will agree.

      Can you guarantee that my GPS will agree with your smartphone? Good luck with that.

      Besides, sectionals are printed every 6months, contain correctional lines for compass corrections (local variations are all over the place). This is one of the reason for the requirement to have a sectional less than 6mos old.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    33. Re:For the airplane geeks... by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      A compass will give you the local magnetic north. I'm looking at a 2005 sectional for the North Carolina area (I use it as a poster on my cube wall). There is a dashed magenta line approximately halfway between RDU and GSO that specifies an 8 degree W correction to get true north. Not all of these dashed magenta lines are straight.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    34. Re:For the airplane geeks... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Never. Common sense (listen for sounds, go to them, and if it's water, go downstream, if it's not water, it's probably a person or machinery) goes much much further than having a compass. Sure, a compass could help, but it's less useful than a GPS and almost never required to increase the chance of survival.

      And when you're in mid-air, trying to find a runway, and running out of fuel? Flying low and slow over a forest to check for moss is probably not one of your preferred options.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    35. Re:For the airplane geeks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      And when you're in mid-air, trying to find a runway, and running out of fuel?

      Then you already broke a number of laws or requirements to get in that position and wouldn't be a safe pilot regardless of the presence of a magnetic compass. Also, many avionics packages include a mechanical compass that does follow true north, so loss of your GPS will still result in a true north compass. Not to mention you are apparently replying to a subset of my statements on hiking you singled out and then reapplied to aviation such that they aren't directly applicable.

      Flying low and slow over a forest to check for moss is probably not one of your preferred options.

      That's not far off from what you are to do. If you lost everything, you should look to the ground to clues to where you are. However, since you are a professional smartass with no flying experience, you wouldn't recognize the truth if it crash landed on your ass. And, since you have decided I'm wrong, you will lash out like an idiot even if I were to prove you wrong. Not that I haven't.

      It would be essentially impossible to lose all instruments in an airplane other than the compass. In many cases today, the compass in the cockpit is not a free-standing magnetic compass that would operate properly if all power to all the instruments were lost.

      But if everything was lost vs everything but the compass, the result would be essentially the same. The pilot wouldn't instantly forget where they were headed. They'd know the previous bearing and be able to head on dead reckoning without an issue. The area they are headed to at least has an airport, which are designed to be seen well from the air. And in the US, there are piles of roads on the ground. Specifically in flight training you are told that if all the instruments are lost, fly low and look for the moss, I mean roads. Follow them, based on your knowledge of the area, to an airport. If that's not possible, land on the road, if it can be done safely.

      But then, the number of incidents where a plane loses all instruments except a compass is close enough to zero that we can consider it practically impossible. And if all instruments were dead, a hand-held compass would be useless in a plane. Surrounded by so many metallic objects the compass wouldn't work properly. So your backup plan is useless and contrary to the FAA's recommendations. But don't let the truth stop you from asserting useless things to support your personal opinion. I'm sure you'll come up with all sorts of reasons I'm wrong and you are right.

      By the way, how many years have you held your pilot's license?

    36. Re:For the airplane geeks... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      My airplane, for example, cost $10,000 and weighs about 450 pounds, empty. It has very little space to add *any* unnecessary equipment, and even if it did, it doesn't have an electrical system; somehow, I doubt that your INS runs on batteries. Requiring a 17 pound, 3U rackmount box that won't work unless I *also* install an electrical system to my airplane (not a trivial task; I've checked) is just stupid.

      The smartphone is a lot more practical, but my Hero sucks battery power like mad when I'm using the GPS and navigation software. Also, I don't know how your smartphone works, but mine requires a 3G network to download the maps (which it does in realtime, so you don't typically notice it). A lot of places I fly don't have telephone networks, so that rules out smartphone navigation.

      Magnetic compass, ftw.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    37. Re:For the airplane geeks... by arctan1701 · · Score: 1

      Last time I went out on a multi-day hike, I took neither. Among the group, there was one GPS and no compasses. Unless you are hiking cross-country without any trails at all, you'd have to be a moron to get lost, even with no map and compass.

      The National Park Service has a term for people like you, "Touron". You carry the map and compass for when you get lost because you were so pig headed that you thought the game run was the trail. Do you also drink the water right from the stream because "it's all natural spring water!" and then don't understand why you get the shits a week later?

    38. Re:For the airplane geeks... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No, I can actually spell giardia (don't know your spell checker, but it's not in mine). Most people can't read a map or use a compass well enough to get themselves unlost with one. As such, recommendations that people carry one are useless. Either they know how to use it and can make the judgment for themselves, or the presence of it wouldn't have assisted them anyway.

      You carry the map and compass for when you get lost because you were so pig headed that you thought the game run was the trail.

      How many separate national parks have you hiked in? How many times have you needed to consult a map because you were completely lost? Go ahead, if you are going to assert my inadequacy, present your credentials and experience. Though I'm guessing you'll do what most do, reply with silence because you are wrong and can't justify your incorrect opinion with facts. But I'll be here if you ever do.

  22. I dont know about you guys.. by Javajunk · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you guys, but I'm buying a good compass, mounting it somewhere immovable, marking north and watching to see if there is any visible change by next year. At the very least it will make straightening out my satellite dish an easier job if i have a compass nearby.

    --
    "It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems just with potatoes." Douglas Adams
  23. Tampa? Really? by damn_registrars · · Score: 0

    I'm surprised that third-world hellhole has the technology to measure such subtle variations in the earth's magnetic field. I would have expected that, much like with Cuba, we would have banned the sale of such things to them.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  24. Re:Cyrillic Santa by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Does Santa live at the magnetic North Pole? Seems like it would be a pain to keep moving your workship around all the time. Maybe he has it mounted on rails?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  25. Obligatory pun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That cataclysmic theory is for the birds.

  26. Can you smell the freedom? I can :-) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It will take out their entire infrastructure, goodbye control :-)

  27. Gradualists are wrong by PowerEdge · · Score: 1

    There is evidence in cooling magma Earth's poles can and have changed rapidly. http://www.sciencenews.org/view/generic/id/62947/title/Geomagnetic_field_flip-flops_in_a_flash

    1. Re:Gradualists are wrong by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Every few years someone comes along and says that very thing..and then are shown wrong. I would like to read the study as opposed to a quick write up. Don't use ANY write up about an article to form a confident scientific opinion.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Gradualists are wrong by kramulous · · Score: 1

      From the article you linked

      t is only the second report of such a speedy change in geomagnetic direction. The first, described in 1995 based on rocks at Steens Mountain, Ore., has never gained widespread acceptance in the paleomagnetism community.

      Tough crowd that paleomagnetic lot.

      --
      .
  28. Re:Cyrillic Santa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashcode won't display it. just use Google Translate.

  29. Falling birds cause? No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Could this also be the explanation for the falling/dead birds this week?"

    No. Especially because there are already saner explanations and evidence for them.

    Many maps say something like "1 degree declination shift per year" on them, which matters only a little, unless you look at the map 10 years later. Eventually the adjustment adds up. Same for airports. They're renumbering the runways because of YEARS of drift between "true north" and "magnetic north", such that if aircraft use a magnetic compass, maybe "Runway 21" (i.e. at an azimuth of 210 degrees) should actually be "Runway 20" (200 degrees), or something along those lines (someone else has explained the actual terminology).

    Why years and years of incrementally changing magnetic declination should have anything to do with dying birds is something only the conspiracy theorists with overactive imaginations can suggest, because it certainly doesn't make any scientific sense. No more sense than any of the other crazy ideas about "catastrophic" pole shifts, which are a bunch of pseudoscientific nonsense useful only to sell books and bad movies to the gullible. And, no, it doesn't really matter whether you're talking about "catastrophic" magnetic or geographic pole shifts, because they're both utterly ridiculous. It's only a question of degree. (har har)

  30. Sectional charts too by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    When I first started flying most of Florida was on or near the zero isogonic line (meaning that magnetic north = true north). http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://avstop.com/ac/fig8-7.jpg&imgrefurl=http://avstop.com/ac/8-2.html&h=312&w=467&sz=33&tbnid=3K2v1zfxl4_SBM:&tbnh=86&tbnw=128&prev=/images%3Fq%3Disogonic%2Blines&zoom=1&q=isogonic+lines&hl=en&usg=__nCfPrwsREvO8rbUJUiDGLqyEMuw=&sa=X&ei=fSomTeusGoO78gb-nLGLAg&ved=0CCgQ9QEwBQ This line ran through the Bermuda triangle as well as the great lakes, two areas in the world where many ships have been lost. Today there is probably over a 5 degree deviation between true and magnetic north over Florida, and since runway numbers are to the nearest 10 degrees I suppose a few of them might change. It also means that VFR pilots over Florida used to be able to ignore the need to correct their compass headings to match course headings (maps are read in true degrees not magnetic), now they will have to apply the correction to stay on course.

  31. Why use magnetic north? by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Why do they use magnetic north and not true north?

    That way they wouldn't have to renumber runways periodically and reprint maps and charts leading to confusion when someone has an out of date chart.

    Most small plane pilots fly close enough to home that they just have to remember their deviation from magnetic north.

    Larger private plane and commercial pilots already have electronic equipment that can show them true north.

    They already use true north in areas where compass readings are unreliable by appending T to the runway number. Why not extend that to all runways?

    1. Re:Why use magnetic north? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Because when you're sitting in the cockpit, looking at your compass, you don't see true, you see magnetic. You are able to adjust aircraft compasses for the magnetic deviation (shown on nav maps, and flight charts).

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    2. Re:Why use magnetic north? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      If you adjust your compass for magnetic deviation, then doesn't it show true north?

    3. Re:Why use magnetic north? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Why do they use magnetic north and not true north?

      Because disciplined pilots will line up on the runway, then perform a quick compass check to verify that they are, in fact, on the runway they intended to be using. It's a big deal because there are runways that are not quite parallel with each other, and taxiing into position on the wrong runway can and has caused fatal accidents.

      That way they wouldn't have to renumber runways periodically and reprint maps and charts leading to confusion when someone has an out of date chart.

      They would have to reprint charts anyway. First, things change, more often than you would expect. Frequencies change, cities grow and die, new towers are erected, airspace is allocated where it was previously uncontrolled (or at least, was a different class of airspace), etc. Consequently, NOAA publishes sectional charts -- the most common chart for low altitude navigation -- every six months to keep things up to date. Airport diagrams, which I suspect are more what you were referring to, change even more often as new runways and taxiways are built, new ramps and terminals are constructed, etc. While pilots do fly with out of date charts, it's a really, really bad idea and runway numbering is the least of the problems you can encounter if your charts are expired.

      Most small plane pilots fly close enough to home that they just have to remember their deviation from magnetic north.

      Are you sure about that? In my "local area" magnetic deviation varies by about 3-4 degrees, IIRC, but offhand, I couldn't tell you which airports are 23E, 24E, 25E or 26E deviation in my local area. I'd have to look it up. Also, I may be odd, but I've made some rather long trips away from home, including flying the AlCan highway a few times. I certainly couldn't remember the magnetic deviation for every airport I've visited even on a single one of those trips. Asking pilots to "just...remember their deviation from magnetic north" is just asking for trouble, especially if the only reason for doing so is to keep the once-a-decade-or-two task of renumbering an airport from being necessary. That's making a whole lot of work to eliminate a very rare -- but nevertheless mundane -- task.

      Larger private plane and commercial pilots already have electronic equipment that can show them true north.

      Yes, but the most reliable instrument in the cockpit is the whiskey compass. Even the most jaded glass cockpit jock still should be checking that the compass is more or less aligned with the runway heading before takeoff.

      They already use true north in areas where compass readings are unreliable by appending T to the runway number. Why not extend that to all runways?

      Because surface winds are reported in magnetic heading? Because there isn't a compelling reason to do so, and retraining everyone to a new, arbitrary standard is more effort than repainting a runway number once every 10-20 years (less often the further south you go, IIRC). Because using a magnetic heading -- which matches your compass headed -- allows pilots to double check things before take-off? I could go on, but you get the idea.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:Why use magnetic north? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      No, it shows magnetic north, because deviation isn't constant everywhere on the earth. On a typical 50-70 mile cross country flight in my neck of the woods, deviation changes by about three degrees (I'm rather far north and rather far west, so the change is a bit more extreme than it would be in, say, Arkansas). If you were to adjust your compass to point to true north rather than magnetic north, how would you know if you forgot to adjust it? This would be a trivial problem if I stayed in my local area, but the further I fly, the greater this problem becomes. By leaving the compass set to magnetic north, I have a constant, fixed reference point to base my navigation upon. When I plan a flight, I calculate the deviation into my navigation log, but always base my calculations upon magnetic heading. Then, even if I have a complete electrical systems failure in my airplane, I can still use my watch, my compass, and my (paper) navigation log to navigate. Once I start mucking with my compass in flight, I no longer have a reliable reference point.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    5. Re:Why use magnetic north? by hawguy · · Score: 1

      So I don't get it, the previous poster said:

      You are able to adjust aircraft compasses for the magnetic deviation (shown on nav maps, and flight charts).

      I asked:

      If you adjust your compass for magnetic deviation, then doesn't it show true north?

      and you said:

      No, it shows magnetic north, because deviation isn't constant everywhere on the earth.

      So if you are adjusting your compass for magnetic deviation, then why is it not pointing to true north? Without adjustment it should be pointing to magnetic north since that's what compasses do, but if you adjust it for magnetic deviation as printed in charts, to this layman it seems that it should then be pointed to true north (at least, as long as you don't travel too far. (and I'm ignoring adjustments made to correct for deviations caused by local interference from metallic objects in the cockpit which presumably are only done once)

      Maybe you meant that pilots don't routinely adjust their compass (even though they could if they wanted to)?

      Thanks for your other post describing in more detail why magnetic headings are used.

    6. Re:Why use magnetic north? by tweak13 · · Score: 1

      You don't adjust your compass. There wouldn't be a point, as you would constantly have to readjust. Also, most are suspended in liquid, so you couldn't access it anyway. I believe the previous poster meant to suggest that you (the pilot) can adjust your course for the change. Aviation charts have the lines of magnetic variance printed on them so it becomes a simple addition/subtraction to correct for whatever the local variance is.

    7. Re:Why use magnetic north? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Sorry -- I didn't take the time to see what dcw3 had posted. He was incorrect to say that pilots "...are able to adjust the aircraft compasses for magnetic deviation..." While we can adjust the compass within a rather limited range of error for electromagnetic fields within the airplane (as you suspected), we don't adjust the compass for magnetic deviation. I had to replace the compass in my airplane about three years ago, and IIRC, I could only get about ten, maybe fifteen, degrees of variation with the adjustment screws. In a lot of places, that wouldn't be enough of an adjustment to correct for deviation (I have to subtract about 23 or 24 degrees from the compass heading to get true heading where I live). Making the problem worse, when you adjust north-south errors, it tends to introduce east-west errors in the compass. The trick is to find a point at which both errors are minimized, then, just like with magnetic deviation, you correct for the calibration errors in your flight planning. It's actually sounds a lot more complicated here on /. than it really is to perform :)

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    8. Re:Why use magnetic north? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Ok, we'll it's been about 15 years since I last used my pilots license. Your experience may be different than mine, but I was taught to adjust the compass as part of my preflight. The compasses I used in Cessna 152, 172 and 182s were all adjustable. Unless you're traveling very long distances, and only east/west distances would matter, would you need to readjust...I believe tweak13 is incorrect on that.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    9. Re:Why use magnetic north? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I think you are probably confusing the directional gyro (D.G.) with the magnetic compass. You can set the D.G. within a full 360 degree range of motion, but not the compass, and as you said, setting the D.G. to match the compass is a part of the pre-takeoff checklist.

      I suppose you could set the D.G. to true heading, but not every airplane has a D.G. (although a *magnetic* heading indicator is an FAA requirement), so if you started aligning runways and airways with true headings instead of magnetic headings, it could get confusing when you switch airplanes. For example, a couple of years ago, I was flight instructing at a school in Anchorage in airplanes that had D.G.s, but my airplane only had a rudimentary compass. It would have been a pain to try to remember when to correct for deviation and when not to. I can guarantee I would have mixed it up from time to time. It is less confusing, IMHO, to just use magnetic heading and repaint runway designations every ten or twenty years.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    10. Re:Why use magnetic north? by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      My apologies. You are absolutely correct, and now I'm feeling like an idiot for my original statement. Guess it's a good thing I'm not in the left seat anymore.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
  32. How to confuse a Air Traffic Controller by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I was flying into Des Moines airport shortly after they had to re-number the runways here. The controller cleared me to land on 31 Right, and I asked why it had changed, He explained about the pole shift, and I asked him if the instersecting runway (23) had changed? No it had stayed the same. I asked "Does that mean they will eventuallly be paralell?" (long silence) "We'll have to get back to you on that"

    1. Re:How to confuse a Air Traffic Controller by digitig · · Score: 2

      I was flying into Des Moines airport shortly after they had to re-number the runways here. The controller cleared me to land on 31 Right, and I asked why it had changed, He explained about the pole shift, and I asked him if the instersecting runway (23) had changed? No it had stayed the same. I asked "Does that mean they will eventuallly be paralell?" (long silence) "We'll have to get back to you on that"

      304 degrees changes to 305 degrees, the runway designation changes from 30 to 31. Meanwhile 231 degrees changes to 232 degrees, it remains Runway 23. I expect the controller had other things to do and trusted you to check /. for the answer one day.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  33. Re:Cyrillic Santa by yotto · · Score: 1

    I don't know about Cryllic but in English we spell it "Claus"

    Unless you're talking about The Santa Clause.

  34. Big Deal by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    If "The Core" taught me anything, its that all we have to do is make a subway train to the core of the Earth, blow up some bombs, and we can restart the magnetic spin. How big a deal is magnetic north moving a few degrees? I bet that would only take a couple nukes at most!

  35. Regarding the birds by aliquis · · Score: 2

    Happened in Falköping, Sweden to:
    http://gfx2.aftonbladet-cdn.se/multimedia/dynamic/01365/05s21-pippidea-809_1365286l.jpg

    But it was just a retarded truck driver who had drove them over.

    People started to talk about fish, bees and some idiots about electromagnetic waves from phone antennas, UFOs, (US) government supposedly spraying barium, strontium and so on into the atmosphere showing pictures of planes with regular trails and saying "OMG OMG OMG!" ... Oh well. And the bees (actually) died from some Monsanto (?) poisoning which also happened to kill bees, which was known.

    Funny how everything bad comes from Monsanto but anyway :)

    1. Re:Regarding the birds by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      No, direct stelaing comes from the banks. From monsanto comes only bio and chemical warfare against the general population (and some patent problems).

  36. Magnetic field reversals, earth's core, and death by ed1park · · Score: 1

    Every once in a while (geologically speaking) the earth's magnetic poles will reverse! No one knows why. And the magnetic field protects us from solar winds and cosmic radiation, which would otherwise destroy earth. What keeps the field going? The earth's molten core. But it's cooling off slowly and one day the magnetic field will be gone and all life on earth will probably end. I propose the next environmental movement be to SAVE THE MAGNETIC FIELDS! ;)

    "Based upon the study of lava flows of basalt throughout the world, it has been proposed that the Earth's magnetic field reverses at intervals, ranging from tens of thousands to many millions of years, with an average interval of approximately 300,000 years.[15] However, the last such event, called the Brunhes–Matuyama reversal, is observed to have occurred some 780,000 years ago.

    There is no clear theory as to how the geomagnetic reversals might have occurred . Some scientists have produced models for the core of the Earth wherein the magnetic field is only quasi-stable and the poles can spontaneously migrate from one orientation to the other over the course of a few hundred to a few thousand years. Other scientists propose that the geodynamo first turns itself off, either spontaneously or through some external action like a comet impact, and then restarts itself with the magnetic "North" pole pointing either North or South. External events are not likely to be routine causes of magnetic field reversals due to the lack of a correlation between the age of impact craters and the timing of reversals. Regardless of the cause, when the magnetic pole flips from one hemisphere to the other this is known as a reversal, whereas temporary dipole tilt variations that take the dipole axis across the equator and then back to the original polarity are known as excursions."

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Earth's_magnetic_field

  37. Duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As an amateur pilot I knew this 20 years ago and have seen the local strip change its numbers a few times.
    Not really news but I guess if you did not know the Magnetic Pole does drift about and is currently moving in an increasing speed towards Siberia (I seem to recall).
     

  38. LHC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, are we still saying the LHC won't cause any problems? Hmmmmmmmm?

  39. Birds hit each other and objects and died by Rogue974 · · Score: 1

    The initial post was a bit off handed joking, but if anyone is really wondering, I have heard a number of discussions with Avian experts. The prevailing opinion is the birds ran into each other and objects when they were scared by fireworks. The areas that have had the birds die are some that have species of birds that congregate in large groups in winter months. Normally they are spread out and the population density is very low. During winter, these birds group into groups of hundreds of thousands of birds and will hang out in the tree tops or wherever is convenient.

    New year happens, many people set off fireworks, hundred of thousands of birds take flight at the same time, slam into each other, get stunned, and then drop to the group and die from impact. Also, when you look at the numbers of birds dieing, it is so tiny compared to the total population of the birds, the impact on the species is non-existant.

    1. Re:Birds hit each other and objects and died by ohiovr · · Score: 1

      So why doesn't this happen EVERY YEAR?

    2. Re:Birds hit each other and objects and died by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does happen every year. This year the news was slow and the journalists, who are desperate to keep their dieing occupations alive, are looking for anything to cling to. A story in Georgia about a few thousand birds dieing, sparks interest, then someone in North Dakota notices the few hundred birds that died there and prints it. Then in Sweden, the few hundred birds who get stunned and then run over by a bus makes the news and suddenly a routine common event turns into something that has never happened before and is news worthy.

  40. Much Ado About Nothing by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I learned to fly at Elmendorf AFB, in Anchorage, Alaska back in the early '90s. When I first started flying at the Elmendorf Aero Club, the main runway was runway 05. A few years later, it was redesignated runway 06. Merrill Field, a civilian airport just a couple of miles away, also had to change the primary designation from 06 to 07 at about the same time.

    The magnetic poles shift with time, eventually by a significant factor. Since runways are designated by magnetic heading (for example, Elmendorf's runway 06 means the runway is pointed roughly to 60 degrees, and Anchorage International Airport's runway 14 is pointed roughly to 140 degrees), every so often airport management has to redesignate the runways to match the approximate magnetic heading with which the runways are aligned. It's no big deal, and has been happening for as long as there have been runways. All of the speculation at the end of TFS about "...shifting poles finally starting to affect air travel..." and "falling birds" is alarmist nonsense.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  41. mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a pilot, I can tell you there's a shit ton of stuff to do before you land, you don't have time to break out the sextant. Much better that the airport is inconvenienced once every 10 years than every pilot every time they land.

    1. Re:mod parent up by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      And just remember that the inconvenience for the airport every 10 years won't put any lifes in risk. The inconvenience for the pilots every time they land will put several (every crew member and passenger) lifes at risk.

      Also, I don't get the GP. The pilots like it the way it is, the airports aren't complaining either and nobody else ever see the numbers (except by curiosity). What is his problem with the current convention?

    2. Re:mod parent up by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Lack of adequate counseling?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  42. I have a simpler solution to this "problem". by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about LOOKING at the runway? Most of the sane world uses this ingenious method to navigate the world. Perhaps pilots could consider this too?

  43. HAARP by flappinbooger · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows the dead birds are due to HAARP and weather modification but are afraid to say it. Come on people! Break out the tinfoil hats and fire up the conspiracy theory machine.

    --
    Flappinbooger isn't my real name
  44. "The Core" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone remember that great movie called "The Core"....just my opinion :)

  45. Pole shift link? by Pyrus.mg · · Score: 1

    Why the hell does a summary about an article on magnetic pole wandering end with a mislabelled link to a wikipedia article about pseudo-scientific rapid geographic pole shifting?

  46. Re:Falling birds cause? No. by ohiovr · · Score: 1

    How is there a conspiracy to change the magnetic pole? Never heard of this.

  47. Mod parent down by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 1

    Quit tooting your own horn, dude. This happens on a regular basis to about everyone here. And on the flip side, most people here are smart enough to know that they had many more bad suppositions that ended up to be false. Sorry, but this is how the world works. =(

    1. Re:Mod parent down by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      And on the flip side, most people here are smart enough to know that they had many more bad suppositions that ended up to be false.

      it's true. I once supposed I was wrong about a previous supposition, but turned out I wasn't.

      Nyuk nyuk!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    2. Re:Mod parent down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *slap!*slap!*slap!*

    3. Re:Mod parent down by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      I was stating that this is an old idea, and I am sure i was not the only one to come up with it, however, funny that it now makes news...that's all.

  48. True North by dogsbreath · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm Canadian you insensitve clod. We use True North (coincidentally Strong and Free) for runway designations and thus are immune to drifting runway numbers. Let's hope desperately that the Earth's spin axis doesn't start moving!

    Strangely... as the years go by, I AM feeling a growing desire to learn the Cyrillic alphabet.

    1. Re:True North by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You only do that way, way up north where compasses aren't reliable. The runways in Canada use magnetic numbers just like everyplace else. At the Edmonton City Centre airport there's a pub located at the end of runway 30. The pub is named Runway 29, but they didn't want to change their name when the magnetic pole moved and the runway was renumbered.

    2. Re:True North by juan2074 · · Score: 1

      Not sure I want to drink in a bar at the end of any runway.

  49. Mod parent informative. by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

    I am not a pilot (can you tell?) but long ago did have some business around YZF, YCB, YSY, YCO etc and the runway designations were all True so I thought it would be the same everywhere.

    Bad assumption. Much shame.

    Thanks for making things right!

  50. Not so rare by dogsbreath · · Score: 1

    TFA says this is a "rare" event but runway renumbering must occur all over the place, more so if the longtitude is orthogonal to the path of the magnetic pole.

    Must keep the government airspace handbook editors busy.

  51. Agggghhhhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough already. The poles shift.

    Surely the much bigger concern is that it takes them A WEEK to paint a few digits on the runway?!?!

    Even where I live in the Caribbean it wouldn't take that long.

  52. CBC documentary on this available online by _prime · · Score: 1

    FWIW CBC did a nice documentary on this that covers the process of measuring the shifts, the airport phenominon, what might happen in when greater shifts occur, etc.

    http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natureofthings/2010/northgoessouth/

    Not sure it will be playable globally, but it's worth a shot:

    http://www.cbc.ca/documentaries/natureofthings/video.html?ID=1678474875

  53. You moron! by bsercombe72 · · Score: 1

    Haha - the pole shift wiki article you linked to is about rapid shift of the rotational axis of the Earth NOT the magnetic axis!!!

  54. Nova episode by mattack2 · · Score: 1

    There was a Nova episode about the changes in the Earth's magnetic field, and the polarity reversal, among other things.

    http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/magnetic/

  55. iPhone calibration change... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess I'm going to start having to start waving my iphone in a figure-8 motion instead of
    the infinity motion to calibrate the magnetic compass... :)

  56. Why the birds died by gr8_phk · · Score: 1

    The birds probably died because they ate some of the dead fish, which suggests the fist were poisoned by something, possibly picked up and dumped in the water by said tornado. Speculation on my part, but there were dead fish too. I don't think I'd drink the water there...

  57. Reading compasses is NOT straight forward by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    Reading compasses is NOT straight forward. Both declination (the angle between magnetic north and true north) and deviation (the error induced in a compass by local magnetic fields) must be considered in calculating the true direction. The magnetic north shifts constantly and navigation maps are updated periodically in order to reflect this changing. If you don't calculate your course properly (or if you "lost" the skill), you might wind up in interesting places when electronics fail you.

    This is all entry level navigation stuff and it's blatantly obvious that unlike magnetic north, geographic north never changes. Using geographic north as a reference on an air strip saves you a lot of paint.

    Pre-emptive strike on smart arses: The calculation of the true north remains the same even if magnetic north and south decide to trade places.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  58. 'I hope the gradualists are right' by dugeen · · Score: 1

    Yes, and I hope the spherical Earth theorists are right too. Nice precistroll.

  59. This reported from ITALY too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The death of hundreds of birds who have been found friday 7th on the streets is reported by a major italian newspaper.

    Here is the Google Translate version (that su*ks a little bit: "memory" should be translated by "death" in the title).

    There is no escape....

  60. Falsifiable by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

    Could this also be the explanation for the falling/dead birds this week?"

    This is a falsifiable hypothesis. Birds use the earths magnetic field for navigation, so if it were the cause of their deaths one would expect them to be in the wrong place, either having migrated to somewhere with the wrong temperatures or not enough food or some similar condition in which they are unable to survive. Bird scientists have records about the normal migration patterns of bird populations and where they normally are at various times of the year. A simple comparison of data will answer the question "did these birds die in a place where they normally wouldn't be found at that time of year" and if the answer is no then the hypothesis is refuted. If the answer is yes then we may have something worth investigating. Anyone up for it?

  61. Business as normal by Mipsman · · Score: 1

    This is business as normal. The magnetic pole has always wandered around. Most major airports managed to renumber runways in a single night. The renumbering will be announced in NOTAMs then in “night 0” numbers will be repainted, signs changed and AIP updated. A few hours later it is as if old numbers never existed. London Stansted has done this on 2010-07-02 while nearby Cambridge airport at current rates of change will have about 40 years until having to renumber.

    So runways get renumbered but it's still a rare event, even looking at the scope of an entire country.

    The whole problem could be killed at a pen stroke by switching by basing runway designators on geographic north but for a bunch of reasons including tradition runway designators are based on magnetic runway heading.

  62. As an ATP Pilot by j3pup · · Score: 1

    As an Airline Transport pilot I can tell you this is very common and a normal occurrence. I can assure you we know the difference between magnetic north and true north, and we know which one to use when. Additionally when we are flight planning we use true north corrected to magnetic north. Our maps (sectionals, WAC charts etc.) provide "isogonic lines" which tell us what to subtract or add to get to magnetic north, additionally we need to account for winds, and any compass error.

  63. Runway number repainted due to mag shift by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is NOT an unusual occurrence! Runway number are based on magnetic direction (to the nearest 10 degrees). When I started my pilot training at KADS in Addison, TX in 1978, the deviation was 5 degrees; now, it is about 6. However, due to the runway numbers (15/31), we are not yet at the point of renumbering. It will happen, and the world will not collapse.
    The there may things to worrry about in this world, but this is not one of them.

  64. Birds? by tilleyrw · · Score: 1

    Dead bird and fish? That was from a release of phosphene gas. It was taken from Iraq and stored in the northern midwest. During shipment, the airplane had a "malfunction" and a small cloud was released. Go back to bed America, your government is in control.

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.