Slashdot Mirror


Star Wars Coming To Blu-ray In September

wiredog writes "A bundle of all six movies will sell for $139.99, while sets of the original three films, and the three prequels, will go for $69.99 apiece. Obsessive types can pre-order them on Amazon now. Han shot first!"

62 of 419 comments (clear)

  1. Finally.. by xTK-421x · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can be at my post in *HD*!

    --
    "TK-421, why aren't you at your post?"
    1. Re:Finally.. by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      Well, I won't be replacing my eight year old TV until it croaks, but I do plan on buying a Blu-Ray. Why? My DVD player is on its last legs; it's been incapable of playing a rented movie for a while now, and has even started stuttering on my own discs, so it's time to replace it.

      With Blu-Ray's smaller beams, it seems to me that it should play DVDs a lot longer than Blu_rays, since the beam target is so much smaller on a Blu-Ray.

      But I won't be buying Star Wars on Blu-Ray even if my TV goes titsup and I buy a hidef. I saw the star wars movies in the theater, paid for the tape, paid again for the DVD, and since the unmolested versions of EPsIV-VI aren't in high definition anyway, it doesn't make sense to replace the DVDs.

      I'm not sure if I'll buy any Blu-Ray discs at all; seems that it should take far less damage for a Blu-Ray to play then a DVD, considering the bit density.

    2. Re:Finally.. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      "Well, I won't be replacing my eight year old TV until it croaks, but I do plan on buying a Blu-Ray. Why? My DVD player is on its last legs; it's been incapable of playing a rented movie for a while now, and has even started stuttering on my own discs, so it's time to replace it."

      This Xmas, I gave myself a gift....a bluray player, but in the form of a Sony Playstation.

      I looked at prices, and a standalone, wireless, 3D bluray player that can stream netflix..was in the $200 or so range. (roughly, name branded).

      I looked at the Sony PS3, and saw the same functionality plus...it played games on the side, came bundled with a Bluray dvd (karate kid or something) and a couple of games (Uncharted 2 and some other downloadable one) for only $299....online with no tax and free shipping.

      So far, it is a great player and I like streaming my netflix stuff.

      I've actually tried playing some games, and as I mentioned on other thread the other day...WOW, these things sure have come a long way since PONG.

      :)

      I used to be good at video games as a kid, but I'm having a hell of a time memorizing what all all these buttons and joysticks do, but will learn it. I just keep getting killed a lot.

      Anyway, you might consider looking into this. I feel I got a pretty good deal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. The Right Way by SethThresher · · Score: 5, Funny

    In this edition, obi wan shoots first.

    1. Re:The Right Way by Fibe-Piper · · Score: 3, Funny

      When I read the headline "Starwars Coming..." I think the entire galaxy shot first.

      --
      I went to battle M.C. Escher, but drew a blank.
    2. Re:The Right Way by jimbolauski · · Score: 3

      It would be nice to be able to have the option to watch the originals in an unperverted format, I would consider forking over $140 if that is an option, if that's not an option it's not worth the upgrade from the DVDs.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    3. Re:The Right Way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, in this version Han reaches for his blaster, and finds a walkie-talkie in the holster.

    4. Re:The Right Way by houstonbofh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No. That will be later on a different BluRay edition so you can but it again.

    5. Re:The Right Way by aix+tom · · Score: 3, Funny

      And Jar-Jar ducks out from under the table with Han's Blaster "Yousa dropped something", and then both Han and Greedo Shoot Jar-Jar and then drink a beer together.

  3. Which Verson??? by bstory · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I see the original theater version or do I have to watch parodies of the original?

    1. Re:Which Verson??? by Servaas · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well you don't have to -anything- to be frank. But you can't complain about parodies if you keep buying the crap over and over. Yes Lucas is a douche, but on the other hand why not take easy money from suckers?

    2. Re:Which Verson??? by necro81 · · Score: 2

      One would think that, this being Blu-Ray with prodigious storage abilities, you would be able to choose the version from some on-screen menu. Include or remove scenes (do we want to see Han and Jabba chit-chat in Episode IV?), swap in different version of the same scene (han shot first! death star explosion with or without shockwave), even change the soundtrack (super-echo before swinging across the abyss or no?) - it's all pretty straightforward from a technical standpoint.

      Whether the Emperor...uhhh...George Lucas will permit it is another question.

    3. Re:Which Verson??? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      The last time Emperor Lucas included the theatrical version, he did a nice little underhanded (and spiteful) trick. The Special Edition versions were anamorphic DVD's. The theatrical versions were non-anamorphic widescreen (which, for those who don't understand the distinction, look like shit on widescreen TV's).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Which Verson??? by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Which version of the original theater version? You do realize there were like 5 of them, right? Not to mention that the VHS and LD versions, usually touted also as being the "original" versions, also had discrepancies in things like the audio mix, etc.

      You know, I don't care. So long as it's one of the versions that's not overloaded with tacked-on CG creatures and such, omits the superfluous Jabba scene and leaves the Greedo scene alone, I don't care if it says "Episode IV: A New Hope" or not.

      But it sounds like they're not prepared to do a decent remastering of such a version any time soon. Oh, well. I'll just wait longer, then. There's other movies I can buy.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
  4. No, NOT Star Wars by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The original theatrical releases will NOT be included, only the heavily edited "Special Editions" from the 90's (no doubt with even *more* edits from Lucas piled on, as if he didn't fuck them up enough already).

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was really looking forward to seeing Han shoot Jar Jar first. I've been waiting for that version forever.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    2. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 3, Funny

      ...with even *more* edits

      I would not mind seeing Jabba go Hentai on Leia. Come on George, do it for the fans!

    3. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You obviously haven't seen them, or you would know that they did a *lot* more than just some "retouches." Entire sequences on Cloud City and Tatooine are now unwatchable because of all the distracting CGI shit in the background. And it isn't even *good* CGI (you would think they could have at least sprang for some decent work).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have seen them. And no, they didn't do a lot more than retouches. There's no "unwatchable" scene because of "distracting" CGI. It fits nicely into the background, like it should. The reason you get distracted is because you're looking for reasons to hate, not because they are actually distracting.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    5. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Funny

      during Gungan cunnilingus, that tongue would be long enough to come out her nose......

    6. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by Rhaban · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have seen them. And no, they didn't do a lot more than retouches. There's no "unwatchable" scene because of "distracting" CGI. It fits nicely into the background, like it should. The reason you get distracted is because you're looking for reasons to hate, not because they are actually distracting.

      Have you seen Jabba's scene in A newh hope?

    7. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 3, Funny

      DO NOT WANT!

    8. Re:No, NOT Star Wars by Zumbs · · Score: 2

      Yeah, it turned a dangerous gangster into a comical clown. Why would anyone be scared of a guy that litterally let people walk all over him? In my opinion, the new edition could be saved if they removed that scene and restored the Han-Greedo scene. It should not take to much for them to do that ... I suppose it is just to far away from Lucas' "artistic vision" ... sic ...

      --
      The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head
  5. So This Will Be the ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fifth time I've paid for a license to three of these movies.

    If I'm going to respect copyright, tell me why I don't deserve to have these movies on my Nintendo DS, Netbook HDD, PS3, etc in whatever the latest resolution is. I've cumulatively shelled out hundreds of dollars (with inflation adjustments) for these three movies and yet I'm continually paying for them in the latest format. I bet if they figured out a way to approve lifetime licenses to this media, a lot more people would feel okay buying a copyright. Right now, I'm 28 years old and I've been nickel and dimed since age 12. Also, for those who didn't like the sequels, there appears to be a cheaper subset for $45 of the original three.

    I'm sad that there isn't BD-Live for these in the Amazon description, I'd love to listen to fan commentary and possibly add my own. Has anyone had good/bad experiences with BD-Live commentaries? I was hoping that'd be used to do MST3K versions of popular movies or add insight to movies like Donnie Darko or Lost maybe. Unfortunately, having only received my PS3 this last holiday I've discovered that very very few movies are BD-Live.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:So This Will Be the ... by spidercoz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "A fool and his money are soon parted."

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
    2. Re:So This Will Be the ... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      so, since you multiply-paid for the set, that means to balance things out, a few of us will have to, uhhh, 'download'.

      just to balance things out.

      I'll ACK when I've done my part.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    3. Re:So This Will Be the ... by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Who's the more foolish, the fool, or the fool who follows him?"

    4. Re:So This Will Be the ... by alen · · Score: 2

      other than the fact that you're a fanboy and GL's core customer, it takes time and money to transfer them to each new format. you have to buy the workstations, software and pay people to do the transfer and the work of taking a 30 some year old movie and upgrading it to HD quality

    5. Re:So This Will Be the ... by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Fifth time I've paid for a license to three of these movies.

      If I'm going to respect copyright, tell me why I don't deserve to have these movies on my Nintendo DS, Netbook HDD, PS3, etc in whatever the latest resolution is. I've cumulatively shelled out hundreds of dollars (with inflation adjustments) for these three movies and yet I'm continually paying for them in the latest format.

      You're not paying for the license 5 times. You're paying Lucas off to keep screwing with Star Wars, thus keeping him too busy to go and retroactively ruin "American Graffiti".

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    6. Re:So This Will Be the ... by grasshoppa · · Score: 2

      Here's an idea; chaulk it up to an expensive lesson...AND THEN NEVER REWARD THE BAD BEHAVIOR AGAIN. Obviously you didn't realize that you are only buying a license for the current format and hard copy. Now that you do....

      Sure, that means you will be going with out whatever the latest HD is. Is it necessary? Really? What are you gaining?

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    7. Re:So This Will Be the ... by Binestar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Is the fool who is following him following him so he can part the fool with his money?

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    8. Re:So This Will Be the ... by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 5, Funny

      Merchant: "You really need another copy of the trilogy."
      Fool: "I really need another copy of the trilogy."
      Merchant: "It's only $189.00."
      Fool: "It's only $189.00."
      Merchant: "It's Blu-Ray this time."
      Fool: "It's Blu-Ray this time"
      Merchant: "It's Better."
      Fool: "It's Better"
      Merchant: "I'll take your money, thanks."
      Fool: "Take my money, thanks."

      --
      Huh?
  6. oh good by spidercoz · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was beginning to think Lucas stopped liking money.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  7. So you save 1 cent by Racemaniac · · Score: 4, Informative

    by buying the two boxes separately?

    1. Re:So you save 1 cent by jittles · · Score: 2

      Just wait 6 months and you can buy the digitally remastered Blu-Ray version. Another 6 months after that and you can buy the digitally remastered Blu-Ray version with NEW previously never seen before, add no value to the movie, scenes!

  8. Re:Who cares? What about the Original Editions? by eln · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a bundle of all 3 Star Wars movies available on DVD that comes with two disks for each movie: the crap version and the original theatrical release. I picked it up at Costco a couple of weeks ago. It isn't Blu Ray, but it's a lot better quality than an analog Laser Disc copy. Here it is on Amazon (not a referral link).

    I think those DVDs were covered here on Slashdot a couple of years ago. Again, not Blu-ray (and hence not high def), but the best quality purists among us are going to get of the original releases for the foreseeable future.

  9. Re:BluRay? Why? by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Upconverting can't magically add more detail. There is a very noticeable difference between a blu-ray and upconverted DVD. And honestly, now that blu-ray players are under $100, and movies tend to be around $20, the price issue isn't that important anymore.

  10. Re:BluRay? Why? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

    I still chuckle when someone tells me they just bought a bluray player.

    I ask why because
    1. powerdvd (and it's equivalents) will upconvert
    2. you can buy a upconvert dvd player for $35

    My tinfoil hat tells me that they just want us to buy the same shit in a different format.

    Up converting will never give the same quality as a source image in the correct format.

  11. Not for me! by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Funny

    Unless it includes the most excellent Star Wars Christmas Special it isn't complete.

  12. Re:BluRay? Why? by chronosan · · Score: 2

    Upconverting just makes the DVD format not look like absolute trash on larger screens. It does not add any increased definition, just blurs it nicely.

  13. Re:Who cares? What about the Original Editions? by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes that's what I was talking about. - The Original Edition DVD is a copy of the 1988 analog Laserdisc. Literally. George Lucas claimed the laserdisc was the only copy of the OE that still existed.

    Unlike some people here, I've not bought Star Wars multiple times (and therefore saved money). I bought 3 of them on VHS which I later sold on ebay to recoup my money. Then I bought the Laserdisc-to-DVD from Lucas. And that's it. (Yes I'm a cheapass.)

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  14. Re:BluRay? Why? by RedK · · Score: 2

    - Blu-ray players still play DVD discs.
    - Blu-ray players are also upconverting DVD players.
    - Unconverted DVDs have nothing on Blu-ray discs.

    At 100$ for a decent Blu-ray player, you'd have to be dumb not to buy one. I chuckle when people think they saved 65$ by buying a rubbish Chinese DVD player.

    --
    "Not to mention all the idiots who use words like boxen."
    Anonymous Coward on Monday August 04, @06:49PM
  15. Releasing moves in the updated format by slaxative · · Score: 2

    I see an awful lot of complaints regarding rereleasing Star Wars in a new format. This is incredibly common. Its not like George Lucas is the only person releasing their movie again in a new format.

    --
    This is not the penguin you're looking for.
    1. Re:Releasing moves in the updated format by MBGMorden · · Score: 2

      George is more heavily scrutinized on this issue because of past transgressions. There were at least 3 (probably more) VHS versions of the originals, then the laserdisc versions, then the DVD versions (sure there is more than one DVD set out for them), etc, etc, etc.

      It's not that releasing on BluRay is a bad thing - it's just that based on past experiences, most people see this as the inevitable FIRST OF MANY BluRay releases of these movies.

      Truth be told . . . my only copies of the original trilogy are still on VHS . . .

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  16. That's no moon! by PPH · · Score: 2

    Its a UPS truck bearing Star Wars bundles!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  17. Re:Dead horse by decipher_saint · · Score: 4, Funny

    Imagine if you will a dead horse that deposited millions of dollars into your bank account every time you beat it.

    --
    crazy dynamite monkey
  18. I would pay... by tompaulco · · Score: 2

    I would pay as much as $0 for all 6 movies, or I would pay up to $40 for episodes 4-6 and would accept as low as $40 in payment to take episodes 1-3.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:I would pay... by MooseMuffin · · Score: 2

      Episode 3 was the biggest cinematic missed opportunity I can think of. The whole point of the movie, and the whole point of the prequel trilogy, was to see how and why Anakin went to the dark side. It was the reason we stomached the first two awful movies and should have helped us find new way to look at the original 3 movies. If they could nail that scene, the rest of the garbage might have just been worth it. Instead, the big payoff scene was clumsy and unbelievable and it manages to make all of the prequels all the more pointless. Unless they can get that aspect right, tweaking the rest hardly matters.

      // I just made a star wars post on slashdot. Kill me now.

  19. Also... by denzacar · · Score: 2

    Just checked on amazon.

    Star Wars: The Complete Saga (Episodes I-VI) [Blu-ray] comes with 9 discs - for $89.99.

    Star Wars: The Original Trilogy (Episodes IV - VI) [Blu-ray] and Star Wars: The Prequel Trilogy (Episodes I - III) [Blu-ray] are both 3 disc sets for $44.99 each.

    So, you get 3 extra discs in the complete set for 1 cent more, and you save on the shipping if you don't want or don't qualify for the FREE_Super_Saver_ShippingTM.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  20. Actually, it's Greedo who shoots first. Again. by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It was hand-waved months ago, when they first made the announcement.

    http://geektyrant.com/news/2010/8/14/george-lucas-star-wars-blu-ray-coming-in-2011-and-watch-a-de.html

    Lucas also went on to explain that the original trilogy films included on the Blu-Ray release will be the remastered special editions.

            Releasing the originals is kind of an oxymoron because the quality of the original is not very good. You have to go through and do a whole restoration on it, and you have to do that digitally. It’s a very, very expensive process to do it. So when we did the transfer to digital, we only transferred really the upgraded version.

    In other words, no ORIGINAL original trilogy, cause that would mean some "people" would actually have to be "hired" to do some "work" on those and they would presumably require to be "paid" in return.

    But have no fear. Few years down the road, and Lucas will have his slaves do that for free.
    Or for more actual coffee in their coffee and an additional bathroom brake.
    Cause nothing is too good for his slaves if it will help sell everyone yet another "very, very expensive" set of plastic discs.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Actually, it's Greedo who shoots first. Again. by tuffy · · Score: 2

      The whole excuse is crap, really. Adding all new CG effects required the original film elements that had been transferred to digital. Therefore, making an unaltered version would be a matter of transferring all those pre-CG elements back into a movie. The "Star Trek" series Blu-Ray treatment working similarly, placing both the enhanced and original versions on disc via branching. LucasFilm could do the same, but they choose not to.

      --

      Ita erat quando hic adveni.

    2. Re:Actually, it's Greedo who shoots first. Again. by Chowderbags · · Score: 2

      The most telling quote from George Lucas since the last time he said anything: "Releasing the originals is kind of an oxymoron because the quality of the original is not very good." Apparently quality only means blue screen special effects and a jumble of completely pointless CGI aliens onscreen. Here I thought quality involved plot, strong characters, and not weighing us down with scenes of Galactic Senate CSPAN. As time goes on, we have to seriously doubt if George Lucas had anything to do with the original Star Wars at all.

    3. Re:Actually, it's Greedo who shoots first. Again. by Krater76 · · Score: 2

      Releasing the originals is kind of an oxymoron because the quality of the original is not very good. You have to go through and do a whole restoration on it, and you have to do that digitally. It’s a very, very expensive process to do it. So when we did the transfer to digital, we only transferred really the upgraded version.

      This is such BS it's hard to even understand. How much has changed since the originals? 3%, 5% tops? That means they have already remastered almost the entire movie. What the fans want from Lucas is to spend a little extra cash (which we will obviously end up paying for) and remaster the few scenes that you didn't from before (which should be minimal).

      Then you need to go through and remove the crap you put in before, we want the original theatrical versions - Han shoots first, remove the crappy Jabba scene from ANH, take out the silly falling scream from Luke in ESB, and remove Hayden Christensen from the ghosts at the end and give me my celebrating Ewoks back from RotJ. Among other things.

      --
      "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  21. Re:BluRay? Why? by hal2814 · · Score: 2

    It's all a matter of priorities. Even at $100 I'm not interested. I get all of my TV and movie content online, over-the-air, or from RedBox. RedBox is still predominately DVD and if they have something in BluRay you have to pay a premium for it. Thanks, but no thanks. I'd consider BluRay if RedBox dropped DVD or severely cut the selection of DVDs but even then it's not a slam dunk because I'm pretty sure I'd have to buy an actual player instead of just adding a drive to my HTPC (It's not the fastest machine on earth). I don't want more crap in my living room.

  22. "Guess I'll have to buy the White Album again..." by buckeyeguy · · Score: 2

    As someone who has owned a video copy of SW since RCA Selectavision (gack), I welcome our new format overlords.

    --
    I'd have a personalized plate on my car, but "toxic bachelor" won't fit into 7 letters.
  23. Re:Still waiting... by geekoid · · Score: 2

    Man waiting for technology to stop is still waiting.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. Re:Moichandising! by Moryath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    sets of the bastardized, chopped up, mutilated corpses of the original three films, and the three prequels

    There, fixed that for ya.

    And somehow my .sig feels oh-so-appropriate today...

  25. The Answer by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've been saying for years that ultimately, the system I describe below is the most fair and equitable for both consumers and studios.

    Someone--probably either the government or a government-regulated entity--should set up a "copyright clearinghouse" for media such as movies. If you want to buy a movie, you play a license fee plus a media fee. So say you went out and bought the original Star Wars movie (Episode IV) on DVD for $15. That $15 would technically be, say, $12 for the unlimited private viewing license, plus $3 for the cost of the box, media, distribution, etc. Inside the DVD case you would get a code that you register with the clearinghouse so that they now know that you own the rights to watch Episode IV.

    Okay, now let's say that you want to be able to stream it online. Instead of paying another $15, you only pay $3, which covers the cost of hosting and bandwidth for whoever it is streaming it to you. Want to Blu-ray version? Okay, that will be an extra $5. $2 of that $5 is the cost of upgrading your license to the high-def remastered version, and $3 of it is for the cost again of the media and distribution. Oh, now you want the whole original trilogy? Well, normally it's $45, but since you already own a license for Episode IV, you get $8 shaved off the license cost and only pay $37.

    Content providers could offer discounts on license fees for things like stores that buy the licenses in volume, or for customers who buy several licenses for different products (e.g. a Star Wars/Indiana Jones bundle) at once. Retailers like Amazon could pass those discounts on to customers, or have bundle discounts by applying some of their cut of the media fee to the license fee as a loss leader.

    Content providers win because there would be a shitload more legal copies of the premium editions of their products sold. Retailers win because their profit comes from a cut of the media fee, not the license, and more sales--even for lower amounts--means more money. Consumers win because when you buy a movie on physical media x today, you don't get screwed from having to re-buy it on media y tomorrow or media z in five years.

    Some of you may have had pause when I mentioned the government being involved. The reason why the government needs to be involved is twofold. First, for this idea to work, there needs to be one and only one clearinghouse. Because it would be a monopoly, it would need to be regulated as such. Second, if it's solely a private company endeavor, it would take exactly three nanoseconds for that company to say, "Hey, you know, with all of this data on what media people own, we could make a killing if we sold it to marketing companies," and it would take either direct government ownership or strict government regulation to ensure that privacy is upheld.

  26. These are not the movies you're looking for. by blair1q · · Score: 2

    I have a bad feeling about this.

  27. Re:ive bought them several times by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How are you VHS copies compared to DVD?

    Blissfully lacking in producer interference.

  28. Anakin's Dramatic Turn to the Dark Side by Tetsujin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Episode 3 was the biggest cinematic missed opportunity I can think of. The whole point of the movie, and the whole point of the prequel trilogy, was to see how and why Anakin went to the dark side. It was the reason we stomached the first two awful movies and should have helped us find new way to look at the original 3 movies. If they could nail that scene, the rest of the garbage might have just been worth it. Instead, the big payoff scene was clumsy and unbelievable and it manages to make all of the prequels all the more pointless. Unless they can get that aspect right, tweaking the rest hardly matters.

    Palpatine: So you see, Anakin, being evil offers terrific health benefits. If you needed, say, extensive prosthetic work, that would be covered with zero deductible. The pay is good, plus you have the opportunity to study obscure black arts and transfer the credits toward a degree program.
    Anakin: I don't know... I'm not sure about the whole "conspiring to kill all my friends and comrades" thing. Won't that sort of go against everything I've stood for all my life?
    Palpatine: Oh, let's not dwell on that... Think of the opportunities! Oh, and don't forget your lady is gonna die unless you take drastic, horrifying measures to save her. Remember what happened to your mom? How she was kidnapped and tortured in such a way that the timing of her death coincided exactly with your effort to rescue her? That's what happens if you delay your decision too long.
    Anakin: Well, I know Padme is gonna hate me for this, but OK, you have a deal.
    Palpatine: Good, good! Now, you need a cool Sith name. How about "Vader"?
    Anakin: You seem to have given this some thought...
    Palpatine: Oh, my, no... I'm just really good at this sort of thing... "Vader", "Tyranus", "Sidious", "Maul"... I could come up with names all day long.
    Anakin: Wait, haven't I heard some of those before?
    Palpatine: No, and neither have I. Now, for your first assignment, I'd like you to go slaughter a room full of children. This is a very important and challenging job, so I need to send someone who I know will be capable of seeing it through...

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
  29. New censored version by Beerdood · · Score: 2

    These are the new censored / altered versions of the films. In lieu of other recent events, Lucasfilms decided to rewrite some of the scenes because some people were uncomfortable with the terminology in the earlier versions. With these new versions, teachers will be able to show these movies without feeling awkward.

    Some of the changes include :
    - The word "slave" will be replaced with "indentured servant"
    - Princess Leia no longer in metal bikini in episode VI, wearing a Victorian dress
    - All ewoks, wookies and other humanoid-looking aliens will now be wearing a loincloth (at the very least), even if they don't appear to have genetalia
    - Darth Vader will now don a racially sensitive multi-colored rainbow suit, so we don't infer or suggest that black is the color of evil
    - Any offensive phrases or insults will be modified as to not insult nerf herders, or anyone else. For example, the phrase : "Why you stuck-up, half-witted, scruffy-looking nerf-herder!" - will be replaced with : "Why you highly self esteemed, intellectually challenged, unkempt appearing person that moves large animals with a cane!"

    --
    Global warming and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking number of pirates - Gospel of the FSM