Slashdot Mirror


UK Government Wants to Spring Ahead Two Hours

Anonymous Coward writes "In England it has been proposed that the clocks move forward by 2 hours this summer to give us more daylight time in the day, and hopefully in turn stimulate the economy. My question is what impact will this hold for computers that automatically adjust the time to British Summer Time? Could this cause another 'millennium Bug' fiasco?"

554 comments

  1. Wow, who wrote this summary? by intellitech · · Score: 5, Informative

    Could this cause another 'millennium Bug' fiasco?

    Y2K was a much different situation, one which had absolutely nothing to do with such concepts as "daylight savings," "summer time," and the like. Y2K was caused by silly computer abbreviation of dates, and while DST can cause timekeeping bugs, it's unlikely to cause a worldwide meltdown.

    I would also like to point out that these things are much more likely to break down the more frequently you change them..

    --
    vos nescitis quicquam, nec cogitatis quia expedit nobis ut unus moriatur homo pro populo et non tota gens pereat.
    1. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe programmers in the UK are accustomed to assuming that localtime always equals UTC.

    2. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Tinctorius · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't: UK has DST, UTC doesn't.

    3. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by joe545 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense! In the summer the UK is on UTC+1.

    4. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We already have British Summer Time (GMT+1), so I'd hope not. All that this article is suggesting is making BST GMT+2.

    5. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Antony.S · · Score: 5, Funny

      I doubt it, since they would find themselves fired within 6 months.

    6. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have yet to see one single study that finds economical benefits in using DST. Actually, in the programmers' world, we see a lot of systems costing more because of this : Because DST regulations change almost every year (and I am not talking about leap seconds) the only away to have an accurate local time on a device is to have either regular maintenance or to link the device on internet to receive updates (and add some work to ensure the security of this, which can cost a lot on critical systems). I wish politician computed this cost. They manages to make the simple task of telling the local time too hard for a computer to compute on its own. That is really an achievement on their part.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    7. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by growse · · Score: 1

      Maybe idiots in the UK are accustomed to assuming that localtime always equals UTC.

      FTFY.

      --
      There is nothing interesting going on at my blog
    8. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you on about?

      In the UK the DST regulations have only been changed once since 1971, and that was only to bring the shifting in line with that in Europe.

      As with most things, it's only America that messes around with it regularly.

    9. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I would also like to point out that these things are much more likely to break down the more frequently you change them..

      The more often you change this stuff, the more likely you are to have a test suite that works. Lava flow is the name of the antipattern you are trying to say you think you are experiencing. More change will break you out of the problem. Less change will only make it worse.

    10. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Canazza · · Score: 1

      I think they're wanting BST to be GMT+2 (Ie, CEST) and Normal time to be GMT + 1 (Ie, CET)
      we would, basically, be moving to Central European Time.

      However, this can be vetoed by the Scottish Parliment. I hope it does, or else we'll be having dawn at 9am during winter.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    11. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I am on about making a device that accomodates for DST on every timezone. UK changes every 40 years ? Fine. How many countries have DST do you think ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    12. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I hope it does, or else we'll be having dawn at 9am during winter.

      It's presumably only talking about changing Summer time. IIRC useful daylight in summer is usually from around 5AM to maybe 10:30PM, so this would change our daylight from 6-11:30. That would be pretty cool.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    13. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 3

      I think they're wanting BST to be GMT+2 (Ie, CEST) and Normal time to be GMT + 1 (Ie, CET) we would, basically, be moving to Central European Time.

      However, this can be vetoed by the Scottish Parliment. I hope it does, or else we'll be having dawn at 9am during winter.

      I agree - this should never get off the drawing board. Basically it takes as an assumption that nobody does anything useful in the morning before work. Some of us happen to like the extra hours of daylight in the morning before work because it gives us a chance to go for a run, or work on our own projects or fit in a decent breakfast or whatever.

      Most of us wake up more easily and naturally with the daylight than before sunrise, so Summer means extra time and energy for us. The UK government seems to think that's free productivity that they can tap into for the sake of its economy.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    14. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Antity-H · · Score: 1

      A lot but not all, and those who do can have very different means of deciding on which day they would like to switch between summer and winter time.
      I had to partially implement a timezone handling lib with summertime support and I consider myself lucky to only have CET/CEST aligned countries and countries with no summer time. CET has an algorithmical way of determining the dayt of the switch, it's doesn't always seem to be the case.
      Hopefully I'll be gone by the time they want countries where it's not the case ...

    15. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comprehension failure.

      "Changed once in 40 years" != "Changes every 40 years"

    16. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by rapiddescent · · Score: 1

      here in Scotland, where I live, on the winter solstice dawn will be at 0943hrs whereas Londoners see the sunrise a whole 40mins earlier. Twilight will last longer the farther north one is as well so it won't be fully light until around 1000Hrs.

      If Scotland does vote not to adopt the new timezone - all computer systems will have to be changed to reflect the new TZ data. It still pisses me off that Fedora Linux does not recognise "Edinburgh" as a capital when selecting the TZ during installation but it does recognise USA state capitals.

    17. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "silly abbreviation of dates"? You clearly never had to fit a peson's entire account information into less than 80 bytes of information.

    18. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I remember something about the golf industry in the US making literally $100's of millions for each hour the clock is advanced, and that fuel/energy consumption increases. More time in the evening means more flogging potential means more travel means more fuel consumption. er... if I find a reference I will post it.

    19. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by caluml · · Score: 3, Funny

      It still pisses me off that Fedora Linux does not recognise "Edinburgh" as a capital when selecting the TZ during installation but it does recognise USA state capitals.

      Have you raised a bug about it? Thought about submitting a patch? Or are you just going to stay getting angry about it?

    20. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully there was a very good reason you couldn't use the public domain zoneinfo data and BSD-licensed library code. There's all too much reinventing the wheel already.

    21. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by mysidia · · Score: 0

      I have yet to see one single study that finds economical benefits in using DST.

      What representative cares? It's a neat way for them to flux their legislative muscle, and remind the public who is in charge of their clocks, and that they had better behave, or they will get a workday that starts after the sun has gone down.

    22. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by tepples · · Score: 2

      Maybe programmers in the UK are accustomed to assuming that localtime always equals UTC except during six hardcoded months.

    23. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Cloud+K · · Score: 1

      Give or take an hour. But I'd say you can't have seen what many programmers get away with scot free...

    24. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      However, this can be vetoed by the Scottish Parliment. I hope it does, or else we'll be having dawn at 9am during winter.

      Yeah, that does sound a bit early. That was what you meant, right?

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    25. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Maybe programmers in the UK are accustomed to assuming that localtime always equals UTC except during six hardcoded months.

      Are they keeping time with a word processor?

    26. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Yup, this is a pretty South-centric policy. No surprise it's the Tories who are proposing it. It's not as if Scotland matters.

      I didn't know that the Scottish Parliament could veto it; that gives me some hope.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    27. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      All of Britain uses the same time zone and DST. So there's not any need for more than one reference capital. In the USA, there are 3 time zones, and so the smallest time harmonious area is a state.

      Why make the list longer than necessary? It'd be pathetic to do so for the sake of nationalistic pride rather than utility.

    28. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Interesting point. It's not a bug, just a nationalistic preference. So who gets to decide whether it should be changed or not?

    29. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      here in Scotland, where I live, on the winter solstice dawn will be at 0943hrs [timeanddate.com] whereas Londoners see the sunrise a whole 40mins earlier. Twilight will last longer the farther north one is as well so it won't be fully light until around 1000Hrs.

      London is already a few decades ahead of you, so what's an extra 40 minutes?

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Let's not confuse your personal opinion with that of Scots as a whole. There are more people in favour of double BST in Scotland as well as England.

      http://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchpublications/researcharchive/poll.aspx?oItemId=471

    31. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by eedwardsjr · · Score: 1

      Bingo. When the US decided to change DST to different date, it was one massive pain in ___. It took 3 years of the new cycles to get all of the various software packages working correctly. I feel your pain man.

    32. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by theCoder · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Wikipedia page lists some studies, but I find this one most revealing:

      A 2008 study examined billing data in Indiana before and after it adopted DST in 2006, and concluded that DST increased overall residential electricity consumption by 1% to 4%, due mostly to extra afternoon cooling and extra morning heating; the main increases came in the fall. The overall annual cost of DST to Indiana households was estimated to be $9 million, with an additional $1.7-5.5 million for social costs due to increased pollution.

      There may be benefits to DST, but DST does not save energy, one of the original arguments for DST.

      Keep in mind, the main purpose of DST is to get people up earlier in the morning so that they don't waste that daylight. People are used to getting to work/school by some set time, say 8 AM. If you told them that in the summer, they had to get to work/school by 7 AM, even though they could leave an hour earlier, most people would balk. But if you tell them that 7 AM is really 8 AM, they don't seem to have any problem, and they'll happily go along with it.

      Now, maybe it's easier to just redefine the hours of the day this way than having different schedules for winter and summer months. Lots of people are easily confused by time, and changing your clocks is a one time event, then everything else is "normal." I do find it humorous that people like to keep this convenient fiction, though. If we never had DST and someone proposed it, I think most people would find it ridiculous. But since most people have done it all their life, it's just what we do in the spring and fall (and they think that places that don't do it are somehow backwards and wrong). Just a matter of perspective, I guess.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    33. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      In your Britain, there are no leap seconds?

    34. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by GuldKalle · · Score: 1

      It's not exactly what you wish for, but I once saw a study that claimed that ~25 Danish people die each year due to the stress of losing an hour of sleep (out of ~5 mill people)(and sorry, I have no source). Half a year later we save 5 lives.
      With 2 hours of DST, even a politician or a journalist can imagine what will happen.

      --
      What?
    35. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by slacker775 · · Score: 1

      It still pisses me off that Fedora Linux does not recognise "Edinburgh" as a capital when selecting the TZ during installation but it does recognise USA state capitals.

      New York and Miami are state capitals? Man, I'll bet Albany and Tallahassee will be pretty pissed to learn that.

    36. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I don't know about studies. Until it's happened you can't really study it. But there are plenty of political arguments for economic benefits.

      As for the tech world, it consists of a one off change forward of an extra hour. Or more probably neglecting to change back by an hour on a single occasion. The existing DST changes of one hour would be just the same as before after the one off adjustment of the clock.

      For sure, set-up screens that associate particulat GMT+? times to Britain or specific British cities would need changing. That's data rather than programming though. And it's a pretty easy work around for old software - just set the city as Paris for example - the time will always be the same as there.

    37. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by commodore6502 · · Score: 1

      Your analysis is good but overcomplicated.

      The argument against DST can be made more simply: We are now an 18 hour per day world, where people work from 6 am to midnight. The presence of the sun (or not) makes no impact on work schedules or energy usage. i.e. DST shifts do nothing.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    38. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Software packages shouldn't be keeping track of time. That's something that the OS should be responsible for. You're basically saying that it took 3 years for people to correct the sloppy coding in various software packages.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    39. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I think this DST stuff is all a waste of time, money and resources.

      If companies or workers really cared, they should just change their working hours rather than change the time.

      Nowadays it's not like the bosses and customers stop sending you work just because it's "after office hours". If it's so critical DST and what the clock says isn't going to matter - you just have to do it. If it's not critical, DST doesn't matter either.

      As for the factories - don't they decide when their shifts start and stop?

      --
    40. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      It's your responsibility to make sure your product reflects the world, not the world's responsibility to reflect your product. If international time-zone changes happen too often for you to hard-code them in your product, then you'll have to think of another way of doing it.

    41. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      This was put forward by the section of the UK government that deals with tourism

      They want longer daylight evenings so that people can get out in the evening

      Northern Ireland and Scotland, and possibly Wales will want to opt out, so any increased revenue or savings will vanish due to the admin overheads of 2 time zones in the UK ...

      Most people in the UK will argue that this is a good reason to get one timezone and stick to it and never have BST at all ...we are already on the same time as Portugal and Ireland who are in the EU ...so we are already on European time ....

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    42. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you're confusing an intelligently designed survey with this garbage? Let me quote: "More than two-thirds (69%) felt that they would feel safer walking outside after dark" So help me to understand that - you will be less likely to meet a mugger or robber, if the clock reads one hour earlier or later when the sun goes down? Who thought up this moronic question? They hired some kids from the local retard shelter? Further, I don't think they have enough people. Roughly 1000 Londoners, and 500 Scotsmen. Where did they choose all these people from? Londoners seems a no-brainer - they are city people. City people from one city. The Scots? Did they only survey people from Edinburgh? Pfft. As usual, surveys tend to find the answers that the survey takers want to find. Here, in the US, I remember when they started that daylight savings nonsense. And, it is nonsense. All it does is cater to idiots who are incapable of deciding that it's time to go to bed at night, or to get up in the morning.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    43. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1

      It still pisses me off that Fedora Linux does not recognise "Edinburgh" as a capital when selecting the TZ during installation but it does recognise USA state capitals.

      That's not a Fedora thing of even a Linux thing. It's due to the organization of the timezone database, which uses cities (not necessarily capitals) to pin down timezone locations.

      For example, there is no Ottawa entry even though that is the capital of Canada, but it does have Toronto and Montreal simply because they are much bigger population-wise.

      Also, Cardiff has no entry although it is the capital of Wales, and you don't hear the Welsh complaining. Well, maybe they are complaining but who would understand what they're saying?

    44. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the USA, there are 3 time zones

      There are four time zones in the continental United States: Eastern, Central, Mountain, and Pacific. Alaska and Hawaii are each in different time zones as well.

    45. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by corsec67 · · Score: 1

      So Arizona, Hawaii or any of the states in Pacific time aren't states?

      Arizona actually uses 2 time zones: the Indian Reservation in the northeast corner uses DST while the rest of the state doesn't, so some of the year it is one time zone, and then it isn't. Other states are split, so it is definitely not true that every state only has one time zone.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, don't search me
    46. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by linuxgurugamer · · Score: 1

      Wrong. In the US, there are 4 timezones in the lower 48 states:

      Eastern, Central, Mountain and Pacific, going from GMT-5 to GMT-8. When you add in Alaska and Hawaii, there are two more, Alaska and Hawaii-Aleutian, I don't even want to get into the timezones of the US Territories.

    47. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      My product reflects the world : it can give you a precise solar time. Local time is a purely artificial human legal invention that reflects LESS the world with DST than without. But that's ok, I am not complaining about the additional complexity because of the additional work it gives me. I charge $$$/day anyway and I love complex problems. I am just saying that this nonsense is wasting money and is making it necessary to increase machines that could be simpler if not for this artificial dogma.

      A bit like China that refuses any product that contains a map indicating Taiwan as a country. It is silly but computer are powerful enough machines to account for such childish demands.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    48. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by linuxwolf69 · · Score: 1

      In the US there are 5 time zones, not counting Alaska or Hawaii. They are Eastern, Central, Mountain with DST, Arizona (Mountain without DST), and Pacific.
      There are also multiple cities in some of the areas.
      I do agree with you however about the lack of need for larger lists. In the CentOS 5.5 install I've just done, there is only an option for Chicago for Central, my state capital (Austin) isn't an option, but I don 't much care as long as I can set the time zone. Unless I'm mistaken, it should still be possible to set the time zone based on the actual time zone (CST6CDT or GB), this also would remove "nationalistic pride" and just increase the utility.

    49. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      As spoken by someone who made a lot of money back in the 90s replacing Year(2) functions with Year(4). There were actually a lot of Y2K bugs unresolved for years after then. But most of them were non-issues even the ones companies spend millions of dollars to fix were really non-issues as well. There were probably only a few systems that were truly critical with the Y2K bug... The rest (like the expiration of food products) just gave some funny but still readable answers (expires 2/21/111).

      But it was a great marketing ploy that helped fuel the .COM Boom in the 90's If you are going to spend millions to recode your software you might as well get it recoded to work on the New stuff we have now that is connected to the internet. Now that you have internet access you might as well put up a web site, and give access to your employees for "Research" and "Business communication". Where the people will get addicted to using the internet for other means thus spreading. Coming to a climax in 2001. As the infrastructure had been upgraded, and companies really didn't want to spend as much in IT. Then dipping until around 2003 then people started to do their normal incremental upgrades again.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    50. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      I still have legacy equipment that decided to hard code DST settings... Don't do it UK

    51. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Marillion · · Score: 2

      Many people in the UK are accustomed to assuming that localtime always equals GMT. The side effect is many think that GMT = BST when it's in effect. I once worked for an airline and out of necessity, I got REALLY good at timezone math. I once asked for clarification whether a conference call in the middle of July was going to be 16:30 GMT or 16:30 BST and I could hear the blank stares on the line.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    52. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Magic5Ball · · Score: 1

      Some "security" blogger apparently wrote the summary, according to the link. /scarequotes since the blog looks like something a l33t hax0r would write to pretend to be more than a skript kiddie; and even has a '90s-era visitor counter //WHBT. WHL.

      --
      There are 1.1... kinds of people.
    53. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      3? There are 4 timezones used in the mainland 48 states and 7 more covering Alaska, Hawaii, and various territories.

      https://secure.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/wiki/List_of_time_zones_by_country

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    54. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      On the other hand it's useful for those outside of the USA. If I'm told someone lives in Michigan, I don't want to have to prowl the Internet to work out what time it is there. I want to just click a city and add it to the drop down list of time zones I have in my clock. For example, if I hover over the clock on my KDE desktop, it pops up a list of around ten different cities. When I know I'm on the phone to someone in Michigan, I just look at the clock and I see it. I don't have to hit Wikipedia while I'm talking to them and I certainly don't want to have to start memorizing USA geography along with everything else.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    55. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And due to the nature of human thought, "Changed once in 40 years" almost guarantees that what is implied is "Changed twice in 41 years."

    56. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by mpe · · Score: 1

      Actually, in the programmers' world, we see a lot of systems costing more because of this : Because DST regulations change almost every year (and I am not talking about leap seconds) the only away to have an accurate local time on a device is to have either regular maintenance or to link the device on internet to receive updates (and add some work to ensure the security of this, which can cost a lot on critical systems).

      There are many clocks and watches which can only be changed manually. If anything there appear to be more and more such machines each year. Without any standard way of adjustment. Also human body clocks can't be adjusted so easily....

    57. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actually, certain software should be keeping track of their own time. Transactional time stamps would be useless if I could simply change the system date and time, make an alteration, then change it back as if it happened before it really did. If the software package kept it's own time, then anything I did would still be on the correct date and time making fraud a lot more harder in some cases.

    58. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by ejWasTaken · · Score: 0

      I am guessing you are not from the USA. There are more than 3 time zones. We have some where between 7 and 9 depending on how you count, and what you count as the US. Several states have split time zones, and because we like things complicated here in the US, I live in a state that doesn't believe in DST (Arizona), but often gets a separate listing in time zone tables. And there is a section inside the state (the Navajo Nation) that does honor DST, and a section inside that (The Hopi nation) that doesn't honor it.

      There. That should clear things up.

    59. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by richlv · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see one single study that finds economical benefits in using DST.

      that would have to be a fake one. or only focusing on some specific niche, like "dst programmers".
      it's a complete mess and topmost idiocy - to waste so much time on a created problem...

      to give us more daylight time in the day

      right. MAGIC !
      or some astro-engineering.
      just moving the clock an hour or two would be an option (because it makes evenings have more light blahblah), but DON'T MOVE IT ALL THE TIME.

      --
      Rich
    60. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "However, this can be vetoed by the Scottish Parliment. I hope it does, or else we'll be having dawn at 9am during winter." Isn't that what already happens? I spent a term at the University of Aberdeen, and I remember the sun being up about 9am-4pm around Winter Solstice.

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    61. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Infiniti2000 · · Score: 1

      (and sorry, I have no source)

      Here's an article that has links to several sources, albeit from the American perspective. I haven't checked all of the links, but at least a couple seem to work.

    62. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      being a resident of Indiana all my life I have to day that DST is a large pile of poo. Another mandate of the nanny-state to tell me how to live my life.

    63. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by timepilot · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you see: ours goes to eleven.

    64. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by pclminion · · Score: 2

      Who has a conference at 16:30 in ANY time zone? I mean, that's prime drinking time.

    65. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by tverbeek · · Score: 2

      Those are not state capitals you see listed; they are merely "landmark" major cities within each time zone. State capitals are often mid-sized cities, usually chosen for geographic reasons, or even specifically to avoid putting the capital in any of the state's largest cities; as a Scot you probably wouldn't recognize half of them by name. The U.S. did the same thing when the federal capital was created, and when we get around to making the home countries of the UK into the 51st-54th states, we'll probably move the capitals to Dundee SL, Aberystwyth WL, Nottingham EN, and Antrim NI. :)

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    66. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely right. Every operating system has to be updated every time a country in the world does this. There are usually at least 10 updates a year to the tzdata/zoneinfo database. Most operating systems don't push all the updates down because it happens too often. In addition to operating systems, Oracle has to update Java and MySQL. I'm sure there are many other software stacks that must be updated. It becomes problematic for web applications that need to compute time.

      I want them to either get rid of DST or at least leave it for awhile.

    67. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      The Scots are trying to screw up English programmers?

      What about the Welsh?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    68. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by MatthiasF · · Score: 1

      I think the benefits of the system are being curtailed by the fact it's being applied by longitude instead of latitude.

      As most know, the differences in sun rise and sun set align along the latitude (local solar time), yet the daylight savings adjustments are currently aligned against the averaged time zones by longitude. This was the easiest way to do it and it seems to be holding back the system (based off the studies).

      If instead they setup latitude DST to run perpendicular to the date lines, we'd definitely see the efficiencies gained. But this would mean countries like the USA would have 2-3 DST areas (north one from New England west to Washington state, south one from Georgia/Florida to Southern California, and a middle one from North Carolina-Maryland over to Northern California), applied on top of the normal time zones.

      Could get confusing when two people who were in the same time zone now have to deal with an hour difference as well, but would be an hour closer to someone in a time zone behind them.

      It's really the only way DST would work but adoption would be difficult. Maybe less so nowadays that computers and phones can do the adjustments for you, but to explain to the broader public why the system had to become more complicated would probably be a disaster in itself.

    69. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by smellotron · · Score: 1

      You can get pretty far without accounting for leap seconds in many programming gigs. For time intervals, odds are that the interval either contains no leap seconds, or is large enough that the error introduced by the leap second is incredibly small. For absolute timestamps that get formatted into wall-clock time for human consumption, nobody really cares about a handful of seconds.

    70. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by M1FCJ · · Score: 1

      What extra hours of daylight? In winter I wake up in dark, travel in dark and just when I get the office the sun might decide to get over the horizon and give us a bit of light, that is if there are no clouds. Worse in the evenings. There are months where I almost don't see any sunlight apart from the weekends.

      This move is an excellent idea, at least I can use the evenings productively.

    71. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by madprof · · Score: 1

      10 people die?

    72. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by smellotron · · Score: 1

      It's not a bug, just a nationalistic preference. So who gets to decide whether it should be changed or not?

      Sounds like a bug to me; and if it's not, a maintainer can point out exactly why it's not included (population too low, too near to a much-more-noteworthy city, fear of blancmanges, etc.) If individual capitols of the USA are included (regardless of population), that sets the bar for individual sub-national capitols in other nations. TBH I don't know exactly how the UK is structured, but "Capitol of Scotland" sounds like a no-brainer.

    73. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 1

      I have yet to see one single study that finds economical benefits in using DST

      Have you even bothered to search for them?

      The cliff notes of any study on the impact of implementing a daylight savings time in England shows that it helps save between 0.3% and 0.5%, which corresponds to around 0.6% of England's daily energy expenses (the relation between energy production and its' cost is non-linear)

      --
      Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    74. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by isorox · · Score: 1

      Who has a conference at 16:30 in ANY time zone? I mean, that's prime drinking time.

      I often have meetings in the Broadcast Apparatus Room at 16:30

    75. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      In the USA, there are 3 time zones, and so the smallest time harmonious area is a state

      Actually, in just the lower 48 states there are 4 time zones: Eastern, Central, Mountain and Pacific. In addition, Hawaii follows another time zone, and Alaska follows yet another, except the westernmost islands of Alaska follow the same time zone as Hawaii. And not all states follow daylight savings time. At least Arizona doesn't, (the only reasonably comfortable daytime in the low desert summer is around dawn), I can't remember if Indiana still ignores daylight savings time. And though Indiana is in the Eastern time zone, its northwest cities follow Central time, in order to be in sync with Chicago - so the smallest time harmonious area is less than a state in the USA.

    76. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a much simpler solution:

      Leave the clocks as they are on GMT all year round.

      Change work times that were 9-5 to 7-3

      Change the watershed from 9pm to 7pm

      Change pubs to close from 11pm to 9pm

      It amounts to the same thing, except that midday is now when the sun is at its highest at 12pm, not 2 hours later at 2pm

      The only problem is that I'll be getting up at 3am on a normal work day - I hate BST starting as I'm just going to work in the light when it suddenly gets dark again, not to mention trying to get to sleep with lots of light around and people being noisy in it.

    77. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      So, basically, the tourist boards believe it will cause extra hours of daylight to magically appear? The problem with the theory that it will result in more people getting out in the evening is that the more likely result is that more people will be getting up to go to work before sunrise. This can be quite effective at deterring people from spending time out, even if you're working the same hours--your body doesn't care if the clock says you're keeping the same hours. What it notices is that you're up before the sun. You might get more of a boost by dropping daylight savings entirely & developing your after-sunset attractions...

    78. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      hopefully in turn stimulate the economy

      I have yet to see one single study that finds economical benefits in using DST

      There may be benefits to DST, but DST does not save energy

      These are all totally separate concepts and it's as though you are all talking past one another in completely different languages. When Western governments say they want to "stimulate the economy", they really want to stimulate trade, not savings. They want to increase the transfer of wealth from savers to workers or consumers. And, more importantly, they want to increase the tax revenue that comes from this.

      So of course there are no economical benefits in anything governments do to "stimulate the economy". Stimulating the economy destroys savings and increases resource consumption creating pointless make-work. It increases energy usage, and that is by design.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    79. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      What extra hours of daylight? In winter I wake up in dark, travel in dark and just when I get the office the sun might decide to get over the horizon and give us a bit of light, that is if there are no clouds. Worse in the evenings. There are months where I almost don't see any sunlight apart from the weekends.

      This move is an excellent idea, at least I can use the evenings productively.

      This move wouldn't affect Winter which stays on GMT just as it always has. It only affects Summer time which is when you would have extra hours of sunlight before being plunged into an office.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    80. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Keep in mind, the main purpose of DST is to get people up earlier in the morning so that they don't waste that daylight. People are used to getting to work/school by some set time, say 8 AM. If you told them that in the summer, they had to get to work/school by 7 AM, even though they could leave an hour earlier, most people would balk. But if you tell them that 7 AM is really 8 AM, they don't seem to have any problem, and they'll happily go along with it.

      Don't forget the workplaces where they would honor the earlier start time just fine but somehow closing an hour earlier just wouldn't happen.

    81. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I've never been really sure of why we need to make sure that it is light outside so we can go sit in a well-lit temperature controlled environment. Yes, I know that for some people's jobs, sunlight is a necessity, but for the vast majority of the working class, than is not the case. Personally, I would rather have all those daylight hours to do enjoyable things in the outdoors, and let work have the hours that are not as useful for other activitities. Why we have to take the most potentially productive hours of our days and spend them at work baffles me.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    82. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      They're not, they're talking about moving the whole shebang forward an hour to match Central European Time (so winter would be GMT+1, summer GMT+2).

      The main complaints are coming from the north of the country (Scotland especially, but north England and Northern Ireland too), where sunrise in winter starts heading into Arctic Circle territory. Sunrise in Edinburgh starts looking close to 10 o'clock at the peak of winter. Not a great deal of fun. And while we're on the subject, sunset in summer for Edinburgh would end up the wrong side of 11 o'clock at night, which is less important but still weird.

      I'm not really convinced of the benefits either. I'm not sure I understand how they think tourism would be improved by an extra hour of evening daylight. I mean, it's not like the people curtail the kind of activities they get up to at 10 o'clock at night just because the sun's gone down...

      I'm in the sunny south, so it doesn't profoundly affect me personally really. But still, colour me sceptical.

    83. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      That is, alas, not true. The suggestion is to move all times forward an hour, putting the UK in line with Central European Time (GMT+1 in winter, GMT+2 in summer). An interesting comparison of the "new" sunrise and sunset times for peaks of summer and winter is on the BBC site:

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-12523164

    84. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      What they need to do is encourage their tourists to come from the east. When I went to Hawaii from he continental U.S., I found myself waking up naturally at 6 every morning, and feeling like I had slept in. It was 10 o'clock by my body clock, and I was ready to get up and start doing activities.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    85. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by steveg · · Score: 1

      FWIW, in the US there are 4 time zones (not counting Alaska and Hawaii.) And time zones don't follow state lines, so there's no guarantee that your own state capital is in the same time zone you are.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    86. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thanks for being the 7th person to point that out. I was only thinking about the mainland. And that detail was irrelevant to my point about Edinburgh.

    87. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep in mind, the main purpose of DST is to get people up earlier in the morning so that they don't waste that daylight. People are used to getting to work/school by some set time, say 8 AM. If you told them that in the summer, they had to get to work/school by 7 AM, even though they could leave an hour earlier, most people would balk. But if you tell them that 7 AM is really 8 AM, they don't seem to have any problem, and they'll happily go along with it.

      It wouldn't be a problem at all -- so long as TV schedules and business hours ALL change too. And we all now that the media companies dictate to the lawmakers, not the other way around.

    88. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by NoMaster · · Score: 1

      "The Scots are trying to screw up English programmers?

      What about the Welsh?"

      They're going to pull out of the whole deal...

      --
      What part of "a well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    89. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      It would certainly seem to be a defect of some sort, if it doesn't allow a user to choose a location whose jurisdiction allows its time policies to differ from the location the user is forced to choose instead. It's not a problem where the policies coincide, but it certainly becomes one where the policies diverge.

    90. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by omfgnosis · · Score: 1

      From the parent comment, it sounds as if Scotland can reject the change, thereby no longer using the same time policies as the UK.

    91. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Mountain Time includes places like Montana, which can be safely ignored, so 3 time zones is a good approximation.

    92. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Wow! It's even more stupid than I thought. Thanks for the correction. Now where's Guy Fawkes when you need him?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    93. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Pfft! There are two time zones in the US, New York and LA.
      Only an idiot would adjust his watch in three separate one-hour increments while flying between them.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    94. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Alsee · · Score: 1

      P.S.
      There's also a Europe timezone and a China timezone, but nobody really uses them.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    95. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Gunstick · · Score: 1

      In 2010, thousands of terminals and credit cards malfunctioned because the Y2K bug was fixed in a hurry "we will do that properly next year" or "we will have new devices in 3 years anyway". But the cludge was only working for 10 years, and then failed miserably.
      There were more Y2010 bugs crashing important infrastructure than there were in 2000.
      If the Y2K corrections would not have been done, A LOT of stuff would have crashed.

      Note that I already seen my first Y2038 problem...

      --
      Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
    96. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Hell, I lose a couple of hours of sleep every Sunday night because the weekend breaks my schedule from the previous work week. And an occasional bout of insomnia (or a really good book) can make me lose more than 4 hours maybe once a month. I'm tired, but it hasn't killed me yet. How is this one hour (in the middle of a weekend, no less) killing Danes?

    97. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by Golddess · · Score: 1

      and while DST can cause timekeeping bugs, it's unlikely to cause a worldwide meltdown.

      All depends just how bad of a "timekeeping bug" it causes. DST already caused at least one person to be wrongfully imprisoned for 12 days.

      I would also like to point out that these things are much more likely to break down the more frequently you change them..

      No argument there. I'd be happy if DST was just done away with completely.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    98. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Oh, if only everybody would switch to Swatch Internet Time, or Geek Time, or old hexadecimal time. But that would be logical.
      On topic sig, BTW.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    99. Re:Wow, who wrote this summary? by jc42 · · Score: 1

      A bit like China that refuses any product that contains a map indicating Taiwan as a country.

      But strictly speaking, they're right. Taiwan is the name of an island, not of a country. The country's name is Republic of China. They're not even coterminous, because the RoC includes a number of islands that aren't part of the island of Taiwan.

      Yes, people often say "Taiwan" with talking about the RoC, but that's just sloppy speech.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  2. It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by L473ncy · · Score: 2

    I predict lots of people showing up to work 2 hours late if they us their cellphones or iDevice as an alarm clock.

    1. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And the extra sunlight fades my curtains faster...

    2. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by beelsebob · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I can predict a worse outcome for the economy than people simply not being at work early. We currently get 3 hours of overlap with the (east coast) americans in a work day – they don't really want to have meetings absolute first thing, and we don't really want to have one last thing... This would give us only 2 hours overlap and compound the cross-atlantic communication problem.

    3. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      I predict lots of people showing up to work 2 hours late if they us their cellphones or iDevice as an alarm clock.

      Or four hours if they use an iPhone...

    4. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but haven't you considered the value of being in the same time zone as our government? Forget tourism, prevention of accidents, energy savings and whatever else, because those are just side benefits, and quite tentative ones, too. The real benefit is that at long last we will be sharing Berlin Time with the rest of Europe. Like the French, we can finally enjoy the incalculable benefits of being in a timezone that bears no relationship to the actual hours of daylight.

    5. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by sgbett · · Score: 1

      It's OK though, their excuse will be they have to spend 30% of their working day employed by apple ;)

      --
      Invaders must die
    6. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by digitig · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, this change would start to give us a useful overlap with China. Maybe this reflects how the government sees the world economy shifting?

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    7. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      Isn't that a passing problem?

      This because it looks like the US is declining and China is rising.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    8. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by digitig · · Score: 1

      The real benefit is that at long last we will be sharing Berlin Time with the rest of Europe.

      Except those other parts of Europe that are not on Berlin time.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    9. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...that are not yet on Berlin time.

      Fixed that for you. If this transition can happen in France and then Britain, it can happen anywhere else. Logic, reason and "hours of daylight" are of secondary importance to the value of standardisation.

      But I don't know why you are complaining! I am hugely in favour of this move. I'd get up at 4am and call it midday if the Germans said so. Why, I'd even pretend it was my own choice, and that I was doing it to save energy and prevent accidents.

    10. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by somersault · · Score: 1

      I think my Windows 5/6 phones updated themselves for daylight savings.. I'd be surprised if my Android didn't. I'm very surprised that iPhones don't.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      The do, but the "joke" here is that there are bugs (that really should have been caught earlier) in the calendar software in iOS that affects the alarms set before the DST shift. Repeating alarms went off an hour late, non repeating ones an hour early, if they were set before the DST adjustment took place.

      The clock in the phone adjusts fine, but the calendar software loses track of the time on that day.

    12. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by digitig · · Score: 1

      Who says I'm complaining? Although I note that your suggestion that "Logic, reason and "hours of daylight" are of secondary importance to the value of standardisation" hasn't persuaded the USA yet. Maybe because there is a standard in use worldwide. Where it matters -- international aviation, for instance -- they already use UTC.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    13. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by jamesh · · Score: 1

      I can predict a worse outcome for the economy than people simply not being at work early. We currently get 3 hours of overlap with the (east coast) americans in a work day – they don't really want to have meetings absolute first thing, and we don't really want to have one last thing... This would give us only 2 hours overlap and compound the cross-atlantic communication problem.

      Ah. I was wondering where the productivity increase was going to come from that was going to stimulate the economy, and there it is! Less meetings = more productivity.

      And of course there is the boom in anti-curtain-fade product sales, that can't hurt either.

    14. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by jimicus · · Score: 1

      True, but haven't you considered the value of being in the same time zone as our government? Forget tourism, prevention of accidents, energy savings and whatever else, because those are just side benefits, and quite tentative ones, too. The real benefit is that at long last we will be sharing Berlin Time with the rest of Europe. Like the French, we can finally enjoy the incalculable benefits of being in a timezone that bears no relationship to the actual hours of daylight.

      That would explain how come the last time I was in France, I noted they seemed to operate to slightly later working hours.

    15. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my Windows 5/6 phones updated themselves for daylight savings.. I'd be surprised if my Android didn't. I'm very surprised that iPhones don't.

      My current cellphone doesn't change time until you force it to connect to the network (attempt a call or send/receive a text). Just for laughs, on last summers switch I let my phone sit until it changed time on its own.....it took 3 days.

    16. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by itsdapead · · Score: 1

      This would give us only 2 hours overlap and compound the cross-atlantic communication problem.

      A few less 'phone conferences might actually increase productivity...

      Plus, when getting stuff ready for a US-based deadlines, those extra few hours for us UKians can be a lifesaver (I want to develop some business contacts with Hawaii!)

      Meanwhile, the current time zone is just plain wrong for most of the UK (maybe Scotland need their own time zone). Who needs daylight at 4am in the morning when you could have it at 11pm at night?

      --
      In a survey of 100 programmers, 111111 thought that duck-typing was a good idea.
    17. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. The French used to share a time zone with Britain, although they insisted that actually the meridian was Paris (only 2 degrees east of London, so very similar).

      Then, the Nazis invaded. The rest is history.

    18. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Loki_666 · · Score: 1

      What would Loki do? (Referring to your sig)

      I'd just drop all timezones. In the UK people would get up for work at 7am, while their colleagues in Germany would get up at 6am. Americans would wake up at something like 3PM... what's the problem with this system?

      Regardless, if this motion passes I bet lots of consultancy firms get paid big bucks checking client's computers for GMT+2 "readiness". Hmm.... note to self.... take advantage.

      Russia is considering reducing its number of timezones to 3 or 4 as i heard.

    19. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oblig: "I'm not dead yet!" from Monty Python sketch...

    20. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Pfff, over here it's all screwed up if you want to be in the same time zone as our government :)

    21. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by madprof · · Score: 1

      Why? The time will only ever jump in one hour intervals. They will simply not bother putting the clocks back one winter.

    22. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by minorproblem · · Score: 1

      I was thinking this gives a nice overlap with Australia and Asia. In the winter in the UK it is terrible to try and organise meetings with Australia, as they go on DST and become 11 hours different.

    23. Re:It might cause an alarm clock fiasco by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1
      That's actually in large part an illusion -- China's simply growing at a very high rate. The real problem here is that the growth rate is mostly in the form of a huge bubble; they're spending money on things like building cities for nobody to live in.

      Japan actually had something very much like this going on in the 70s or so; they didn't actually need to invent stuff, they could just freeload off the US, and since regulations in the US actually (functionally) actively discourage modernizing your factories unless it's absolutely impossible not to... Well, Japan had no problems building more modern, more efficient factories than the US.

      Then Japan's bubble burst, and they're still in a recession.

      China's bubble? Much, much bigger, and the Chinese government is pumping money into it to make it bigger. It's suspected that this is because they want to have their yuan, converted into a different current & stashed away in Swiss banks, and be out (of the country) before it bursts.

  3. BAU by isorox · · Score: 3, Informative

    Could this cause another 'millennium Bug' fiasco?"

    If it happened tomorrow? It would cause a few problems. If it happens in March? Probably enough time to fix it. If it happens in October or later, no problem. There's usually somewhere in the rest of the world changes their DST policies on a yearly basis -- I believe parts of the U.S. changed in the last year or two.

    It's an OS patch which you wouldn't even notice, a new tzdata file or similar.

    1. Re:BAU by dkf · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's usually somewhere in the rest of the world changes their DST policies on a yearly basis

      That place usually seems to be somewhere in Argentina. For some reason, messing with exact timezone rules seems to be a national pastime there.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    2. Re:BAU by drunkahol · · Score: 3, Funny

      They're trying to creep closer to the Falkland Islands?

      Cheers

      D

    3. Re:BAU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, lots of countries in "the rest of the world" do change DST policies yearly, some have been doing so for decades. I happen to live in one.

      All Linux distros worth something have procedures in place to update timezone data. It used to be bad, but now that the Oz people and the assholes in the USA need it as well, suddenly they stopped pressuring against need for the locale updates for the stable branches. On non-shitty distros, these updates also take care of Java locales, etc.

      Microsoft deploys the timezone updates through Windows Update. It is covered there, as well. The entire DST stuff in Windows is utterly broken due to their use of a master clock in local time (how idiotic is that! should have been fixed when XP was launched), and of a limited, braindamaged modeling of timezone data which cannot keep past records without restrictions. So, don't expect the system to get time conversion right for DST of a few years ago, it has to forget them.

      As for a DST change that is different from 1:00, well, I am not sure about Windows and the BSDs, but this has been supported in glibc systems for a long time. There are places out there that need 00:30 or 01:30, but if microsoft got this wrong on windows, they might actually not be exercising their need.

      As for most embedded crap, well, it never gets DST right anyway. Just set the clocks manually, or tell it to do its job in UTC in the first place.

    4. Re:BAU by scdeimos · · Score: 1

      ...and of a limited, braindamaged modeling of timezone data which cannot keep past records without restrictions. So, don't expect the system to get time conversion right for DST of a few years ago, it has to forget them.

      Can you provide some more information on this? I'm not attacking, I'm genuinely interested in why you think this is the case.

      I know the time zone data in the registry is a mess, but I didn't think there were any limits on how far back in time DST start/end dates for particular years were kept especially since the API takes years 1-9,999 (there's a Y10K bug) and I've seen dozens of entries in some time zones (seems they can't make up their mind from year-to-year).

    5. Re:BAU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could this cause another 'millennium Bug' fiasco?"

      If it happened tomorrow? It would cause a few problems. If it happens in March? Probably enough time to fix it. If it happens in October or later, no problem. There's usually somewhere in the rest of the world changes their DST policies on a yearly basis -- I believe parts of the U.S. changed in the last year or two.

      It's an OS patch which you wouldn't even notice, a new tzdata file or similar.

      As we (IT folks) all found out last time we changed DST, it is NOT just an OS patch. Yes, you do have to patch the OS, but Java does not play nice with others. It does not use the system or system calls to get it's *time*, it uses it's own functions, which need JAVA patches to resolve the DST issue.

      After spending a few hours of making sure the OS was solid, there was then a *mad dash* to find out why applications were failing to recognize the change. Turned out, if it used JAVA, then many more hours of emergency changes were needed, as not many foresaw the JAVA implications.

      Application crashes anyone?

    6. Re:BAU by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      It's an OS patch which you wouldn't even notice, a new tzdata file or similar.

      Well, it's not JUST an OS patch. There could be other things that need to be dealt with, depending on what systems you run. For instance, last time they messed with the DST rules here in the US (shifted the start/end dates by a few weeks) we did discover another problem. The calendar software we run had stored future calendar events as unix timestamps, and those timestamps were generated by the old DST rules. Once the new timezone files had been installed, for events that took place between the old & new start/end dates and which were setup before the new timezone files were in place, all the timestamps were off by 1 hour.

      Yeah, it wasn't a huge problem for us to deal with, but the point is that there can be more involved than a simple timezone file patch.

    7. Re:BAU by Ben+Hutchings · · Score: 1

      In Israel, the parliament only ever specifies the period of DST for one year at a time. I hear that Israeli Windows users don't even bother with automatic DST adjustment.

    8. Re:BAU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The GOI (Government of Iraq) randomly decided not to do DST a few years ago. They waited until a few days before the change so it had a minor impact on some software applications being one hour off; generally speaking, no one noticed.

      Those people are late to their own funerals anyways...

    9. Re:BAU by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I think your calendar software simply scheduled the events for the specified number of seconds in the future, correctly using the tzdata in effect at the time to convert the user's input from local time. Then when the tzdata changed it correctly converted the timestamps using the new tzdata. To solve this "problem" the program would need to retroactively alter existing timestamps when tzdata changed. What if it rescheduled a conference call with someone in a different jurisdiction where there was no change? Seems fraught with possibilities for error. Better to accept that if you suddenly decide to start work an hour earlier you are going to have an extra hour before your first meeting for a few weeks.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    10. Re:BAU by russotto · · Score: 1

      As for most embedded crap, well, it never gets DST right anyway. Just set the clocks manually, or tell it to do its job in UTC in the first place.

      Yeah, you know why it doesn't get DST right? Because when it was made, DST was something other than what was built into it. Which means that if the DST dates changed by a week, you'll either have to be a week wrong, or you'll have to manually adjust it twice when DST change happens. Or, if it allows you to turn DST off, at least you only have to manually adjust it once.

      One company I was at was building an embedded device at the time Bush messed with DST dates. We eventually gave up on fancy downloadable DST systems and had the timezone offset get set when the system checked in with a server. If you weren't connected, tough luck. Not really an option with non-internet connected systems, though. And it's worse if your system needs retrospective dates (ours didn't)

    11. Re:BAU by russotto · · Score: 1

      The calendar software we run had stored future calendar events as unix timestamps, and those timestamps were generated by the old DST rules. Once the new timezone files had been installed, for events that took place between the old & new start/end dates and which were setup before the new timezone files were in place, all the timestamps were off by 1 hour.

      And that's a problem that's impossible to solve in general. You could say that calendar events should be stored in local time, but in fact that's not always the case (consider an event intended to occur at dawn or sunset). And which local time? If there's a conference call between your UK office and your Frankfurt office, and the local time on one side or the other changes, there's no way the calendar software will know which is correct.

    12. Re:BAU by laffer1 · · Score: 1

      It's an OS patch, a Java patch, a MySQL patch, a ...

      It's not hard to do, but it takes time for all the software to be updated and even longer for sysadmins to push it all out around the world.

    13. Re:BAU by smellotron · · Score: 1

      If there's a conference call between your UK office and your Frankfurt office, and the local time on one side or the other changes, there's no way the calendar software will know which is correct.

      If you're going to store a local time-of-day value instead of an epoch, it would be silly to do so without a timezone. So if the record is created by someone in the Frankfurt office, it will read something like "14:00:00 CET". This is not a problem.

    14. Re:BAU by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      I know exactly what the problem was. As I said in my post, it was using unix timestamps generated using the old tzdata. It wasn't a terribly complex problem to fix. The point was, it's not necessarily as simply as dropping in the new tzdata and being all set. There could be data that needs tweaking to get working properly, too.

    15. Re:BAU by isorox · · Score: 1

      As we (IT folks) all found out last time we changed DST, it is NOT just an OS patch.

      Yes, as we (IT folks that have a scope more than one increasingly insignificant country) find out every year. Oct 2009 for example, caused fun for servers based on local time Argentina.

      Personally I only need to watch out for DST changes on servers in 20 timezones, so it doesn't even happen every year. An OS update should patch things like java as well. Normally you get plenty of warning (tzinfo was updated for the upcoming Egypt/Pallestine changes last year), occasionally you get Argentina.

      Of course our systems and workflows are completely based in GMT, we just use localtime for display, so people are aware to check GMT if their local timezone has changed.

      If you have an obsolete UScentric view of the world, you may be surprised. Do your system support UTF by any chance?

    16. Re:BAU by russotto · · Score: 1

      If there's a conference call between your UK office and your Frankfurt office, and the local time on one side or the other changes, there's no way the calendar software will know which is correct.

      If you're going to store a local time-of-day value instead of an epoch, it would be silly to do so without a timezone. So if the record is created by someone in the Frankfurt office, it will read something like "14:00:00 CET". This is not a problem.

      Originally the meeting was scheduled at 14:00 in Frankfurt and 13:00 in the UK. Now UK changes their time. The calendar thinks it's scheduled at 14:00 in Frankfurt and 14:00 in the UK. But perhaps that's not the desired result; perhaps it should have followed UK local time and been scheduled for 13:00 in the UK and 13:00 in Frankfurt. There's no way the calendar program can know.

    17. Re:BAU by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Originally the meeting was scheduled at 14:00 in Frankfurt and 13:00 in the UK. Now UK changes their time. The calendar thinks it's scheduled at 14:00 in Frankfurt and 14:00 in the UK. But perhaps that's not the desired result; perhaps it should have followed UK local time and been scheduled for 13:00 in the UK and 13:00 in Frankfurt. There's no way the calendar program can know.

      The calendar program cannot read minds; the problem you highlight is universal. Even if everybody writes the meeting date/time down in a sheet of paper in their wallet, they'll still need to reconcile when the time zone definitions change, because the original assumptions (relative timezone offsets) have changed. Honoring the time zone of the meeting organizer is the most correct solution, because that is representative of the social structure.

    18. Re:BAU by ResidentSourcerer · · Score: 1

      When the latest round of time zone changes came out, a certain nameless Redmond Washington company was going to charge a very large sum for their update. (I think 40 grand site license...)

      Our solution: Network Time Protocol broadcasts on the local subnet, K-9 free client on each client, and a policy to allow the user to play with the time. They could change the time zone to get it to lie for 3 weeks.

      --
      Third Career: Tree Farmer Second Career: Computer Geek First Career: Teacher, Outdoor Instructor, Photographer.
    19. Re:BAU by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      I think your calendar software simply scheduled the events for the specified number of seconds in the future,

      And therin lies the problem, the user didn't ask it to schedule it for a specified number of seconds in the future, they asked (implicitly) for it to be scheduled at a given local time. The programmer assumed incorrectly that he could reliablly convert a future time from local time to UTC.

      To solve this "problem" the program would need to retroactively alter existing timestamps when tzdata changed

      That would be one way to do it but it seems like a broken one to me. The correct fix would be to save both a locale and a time when setting an alarm (and if the two ends of a conference call are being scheduled by the same system it should enforce that both are scheduled in the same locale). Since in most places the common case would be scheduling somethign in your local time that should be the default. Conversion to UTC should only be done for comparison purposes and any conversions should be redone and conflicts rechecked if/when the timezone data changes.

      It's not rocket science to do right but because most large and economically significant countries have relatively stable timezone data it often gets dealt with improperly, particually when moving data between systems.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  4. Why no skipp falling back by netsuhi.com · · Score: 2

    Why dont we just skipp falling back one autum instead of springing forward two hours in the spring. It would make more sense as it always makes me tired in the mornings when we change the clocke in the spring and two hours seams like a nightmare come Monday morning when the whols country has jetlag.

    1. Re:Why no skipp falling back by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      That's the plan for the winter, but they want the summer time to still be pushed further forward. So, we'll be in UTC+1 for the winter, UTC+2 for the summer, instead of UTC and UTC+1. This means more sunshine in the evening, when I'm awake, and less in the morning, when I'm asleep, so I'm in favour of it. We play ultimate frisbee from about 5:30 in the afternoon during the summer, but we have to stop as soon as the clocks change, because we've run out of daylight, even if it's not raining (improbable, but it does happen sometimes). The new clock settings will mean that we can keep playing until later.

      I've been hoping that they'll do this for a while. Extra daylight in the morning is no use to anyone - people wake up and go to work, but they can use artificial light for that. Most people only use the extra light for things that they couldn't do in artificial light in the evenings.

      I'm totally unconvinced by the Scottish argument that it will increase traffic accidents, for two reasons. The first is that it didn't the last time we tried this. The second is that the sun sets in the winter here before most people leave for work with the current system, so you're either going to be going to work in the dark or going home in the dark.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    2. Re:Why no skipp falling back by xaxa · · Score: 2

      I don't know why businesses who want to just change their standard business hours to 8-16 instead. This is the case in other northern countries (Denmark, Sweden) AFAIK.

      Personally, I'll be annoyed as I think midday should be when the sun's above us, at least for part of the year. Though if it pisses off the Daily Mail (and readers) I'm in favour.

    3. Re:Why no skipp falling back by jvonk · · Score: 2

      So, we'll be in UTC+1 for the winter, UTC+2 for the summer, instead of UTC and UTC+1.

      Isn't there some fundamental irony here? I mean, UTC is based on GMT. This proposal is intended to fundamentally shift the time zone away from the meridian that was originally defined... by the UK... that runs right through the UK.

      The prime meridian is completely arbitrary, but out of the whole world, the UK was allowed to choose it and then base GMT/UTC from it. The more interesting implication is that this proposal is an effort to ensure your "noon" is no longer ever defined as the point when the sun is highest in the UK sky. I mean, the solar/astronomical observations at the Royal Observatory were putatively the reason GMT existed in the first place (and I guarantee the heavenly bodies haven't shifted, haha).

    4. Re:Why no skipp falling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually light in the morning is vital to maintaining proper circadian rhythm. Artificial light will not cut it unless you hang sun lamps over your bed set with timers. This will likely cause and exaggerate a lot of sleep disorders.

    5. Re:Why no skipp falling back by maxume · · Score: 1

      He is proposing that the first transition should be in the fall as it would be a 0 hour shift, rather than a 2 hour shift.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    6. Re:Why no skipp falling back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More traffic accidents happen on the way to work - people are actually more tired (due to appalling sleeping habits) before work then they are after (im sure 20 cups of coffee during the day has nought to do with this) - so the 'Scottish Argument' as you call it is that accidents are less likely to happen during periods of natural light - possibly as it tends to wake folk up more than the faint orange glow of street lights.

      Either way its going to suck - hopefully we'll get our independence before this goes through and can stick with the current model.

    7. Re:Why no skipp falling back by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Actually we had to 'fight' France to be the prime meridian. Now we want to share their timezone...

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    8. Re:Why no skipp falling back by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Remember that there is at most one place (well, one line of places) where the sun is exactly overhead at noon in a particular time zone. Sunset and sunrise times can be noteably different even when traveling in the same time zone. In theory it should only change by up to an hour, but sometimes, the time zones are not exactly one hour (as the sun flies) wide.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    9. Re:Why no skipp falling back by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      That's okay. In the U.S., we use imperial units, which the U.K. made up and abandoned and now pokes fun at us for using.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:Why no skipp falling back by xaxa · · Score: 1

      The UK isn't very wide, except for the very westernmost bit of Northern Ireland it all fits in the +0000 zone (diagram).

      I live at roughly 0.2W :-) (i.e. West London.)

    11. Re:Why no skipp falling back by jvonk · · Score: 1

      ...which the U.K. made up and abandoned...

      Heh. This seems to be a recurring theme. Maybe there is a reason they have been referred to as "Perfidious Albion" (I imagine this is best said in Kirk's "KHAAAAN!" voice).

  5. It's not just England... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... it's the whole of the UK. Otherwise, you'd have to adjust your clocks when you drive from one country to another.

    I wouldn't expect you Mexicans to know that though.

    1. Re:It's not just England... by buchner.johannes · · Score: 1

      US Government Wants to Spring Ahead Two Hours

      "In Washington it has been proposed that the clocks move forward by 2 hours this summer to give us more daylight time in the day, and hopefully in turn stimulate the economy. My question is ..."

      I don't read the summary as England-specific, just that the suggestion originated there (in gov?). No reason to get upset.

      --
      NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    2. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      To be fair, the Scots are reportedly opposed to the proposals because of how dark it'll make their mornings...it does seem fairly England-led. (Some of England, at least - I'm not at all in favour.)

    3. Re:It's not just England... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm in Wales, and I'm in favour. I'd much rather have daylight in the early evening when I can go outside and use it than in the early morning.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:It's not just England... by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Is that right? Surely this only affects them in the summer, where daylight hours are slightly longer.

    5. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "I don't read the summary as England-specific, just that the suggestion originated there (in gov?). No reason to get upset."

      That's rather optimistic of you.

    6. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're Welsh, why do you care about the daylight? Get back the coal mine, you!

    7. Re:It's not just England... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I'm not Welsh, I'm an English invader, but I still get to vote as if I were Welsh.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:It's not just England... by nOw2 · · Score: 1

      The "anonymous coward" who submitted the article actually links to a website, the blog of a 2nd year UK university student. There are articles complaining about the quality of his education. I concur with that.

    9. Re:It's not just England... by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the Scots are reportedly opposed to the proposals because of how dark it'll make their mornings...it does seem fairly England-led. (Some of England, at least - I'm not at all in favour.)

      I'm in Wales, and I'm in favour. I'd much rather have daylight in the early evening when I can go outside and use it than in the early morning.

      Nice for you I'm sure, but it doesn't add any weight against the English-led argument, since Wales is at similar latitude to the English population centres (which is what counts here) not Scotland.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    10. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A working Scot struggles to see daylight already in Winter. In December, the sun rises at approx 9am and sets at 4pm. So the clocks going forward would mean sunrise at 11am and sunset at 6pm. So, essentially no light until lunchtime. You'd get a vaguely light hour after work in which to drive home. but getting to work in the morning would be ever darker than it is now. It's yet another example of London legislating for itself and ignoring Scotland (and I say this as no advocate of Scottish Nationalism).

    11. Re:It's not just England... by jecblackpepper · · Score: 1

      They are though farther west, and thus farther from the meridian. No doubt this idea springs from the south-east of England - probably from someone who has a holiday home in Europe and doesn't like changing their watches on the weekend.

      The argument about tourism is clearly spurious to me, since of all the people in a country, the ones least likely to worry about the time of day are the ones who are on holiday.

      What I would suggest instead is that the government actively encourages people to be more flexible in their working hours so that people can, where appropriate and reasonable, start and end work at whatever time they like. It would enable the rush hour to spread more etc. (Yes there would be places of work where that is not easy to implement - but perhaps those places could decide between themselves what start time is best for the people who work there rather than being tied to specific 9 - 17 hours).

    12. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would that be surprising? That's exactly what happens in the United States. We wouldn't find it even the slightest bit unusual that England, Scotland, Ireland, Wales etc would be in different time zones. You drive, you change clocks.

    13. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of Scots seem to forget that they're outnumbered 10 to 1 by us English. I'm not a morning person, and I hate having the sun rise before 8am (when I don't normally get out of bed before 8:30), yet set before I leave work.

      Bringing our working times in sync with continental Europe would also save businesses millions in lost productivity. Any UK office that has has regular dealings with a European office is painfully aware of that hour at the end of the day.

    14. Re:It's not just England... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's the biggest problem in the winter, where the sun won't rise til 10am in Thurso in December. In the summer, hardly anyone's awake for sunrise so no-one really cares when it is.

    15. Re:It's not just England... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      England is south of Scotland. In the US you change your clock if you drive along a kind of east-west line, not so much when you drive north-south.

    16. Re:It's not just England... by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      ... it's the whole of the UK. Otherwise, you'd have to adjust your clocks when you drive from one country to another.

      1. And you think this would stop legislators from doing it anyway?

      2. It's not actually as bad of a problem as you'd expect. Larger countries like the US deal with multiple time zones without too much trouble. Adjusting your clocks when you cross a national border isn't that much of a challenge.

      3. The *state* I grew up in (Indiana) had more complex time issues. Most of the state didn't observe DST at all -- it was on eastern standard time during the winter, but was effectively on central time during the summer. So during the summer it was on the same time as the state to the west of it, and during the winter it was on the same time as the states north, south, and east of it. Except for two pockets which were on central time because they were close enough to large cities in Illinois, and which *did* observe DST to stay in sync with those cities. And a few more counties close to large cities to the east, which went ahead and observed Eastern DST to stay in line. I grew up talking about "fast time" and "slow time" to coordinate with people across the state borders, or even in different counties within the same state.

  6. meh by LodCrappo · · Score: 2

    Probably not a big deal. Time just isn't that important. For instance the iPhones have screwed up simple time shifts multiple times, and noone seems that concerned about it.

    --
    -Lod
    1. Re:meh by CarbonShell · · Score: 1

      Being pragmatic here: why should we change the time?
      Are our biological clocks more influenced by actual clocks or rather the day/night?

      Summary: no need to crate a technological solution, just get up and go to work earlier!

    2. Re:meh by TheMidget · · Score: 1

      For instance the iPhones have screwed up simple time shifts multiple times, and noone seems that concerned about it.

      Indeed. People only seem to be concerned if a person of value is late...

    3. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being pragmatic here: why should we change the time?

      So that it better matches our biological clocks.

    4. Re:meh by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Summary: no need to crate a technological solution, just get up and go to work earlier!

      Why is it that the people who oppose the clocks changing always come up with this "solution".

      If you don't like the clocks changing then just go to work an hour later in summer or earlier in winter.

      Most of the rest of us have jobs that are tied to wall time. In fact that's WHY the clocks change so that everyone who needs to changes together.

      I've worked with people who are able to and do work "dawn to dusk", "making up" their hours in summer but the vast majority of people can't do 9 to 3 in winter and then 7 to 5 in summer.

      I'm all in favour of going to CET. That way I might get to see the Sun for three more months of the year.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    5. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not a big deal. Time just isn't that important. For instance the iPhones have screwed up simple time shifts multiple times, and noone seems that concerned about it.

      smartphone for personal use != time-sensitive enterprise (or infrastructure) software.

    6. Re:meh by FTWinston · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just, you know, some of us don't want to go to work in the dark. All the bloody time. I fail to see how moving to CET could possibly bring in extra billions to the economy. Dubious economics aside, however, what on Earth is wrong with living in a time zone that reflects your physical location on the globe? I mean, moving Grenwich off of Grenwich mean time permanently is enough of a misnomer to put me off the idea, but WHY would anyone want to mandate that we all get out of bed an hour earlier in the morning? I find the shift to/from BST bad enough as it is - if this became twice as large a shift, it'd be twice as bad, and if it were an "all year-round" change, most of Scotland would see no light til 11am in the winter. How that's a good idea I don't know... people seem to forget that the "extra" hour is just being stolen from the other end of the day!

    7. Re:meh by Enigma23 · · Score: 1

      Probably not a big deal. Time just isn't that important. For instance the iPhones have screwed up simple time shifts multiple times, and noone seems that concerned about it.

      Time is relative. Lunchtime doubly so. :)

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
    8. Re:meh by locofungus · · Score: 1

      Just, you know, some of us don't want to go to work in the dark.

      Just, you know, some of use don't like going to work AND coming home from work in the dark.

      what on Earth is wrong with living in a time zone that reflects your physical location on the globe?

      The working day is wrong. 9-5 gives three hours before noon and 5 hours after. Making solar noon 1pm wall time makes the working day symmetrical.

      A 9-5:30 day which is common makes it even worse.

      So make it 1 hour difference in winter when there are few daylight hours to play with and 2 hours in summer. Simple really.

      people seem to forget that the "extra" hour is just being stolen from the other end of the day!

      I'm all for stealing an hour of daylight from one end of the day so that I get to see the Sun at the other end.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    9. Re:meh by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      Exactly! I agree with you entirely here. When I'm at work, it makes almost no difference what the conditions outside are like. I can hear rain drumming on the roof, but that's about it.

      Ideally, I'd like to have an hour of light for getting up and driving to work in the morning and the rest in the evening for going for a walk, sitting in the garden or at the very least, reducing my home electricity bill. Obviously that's not possible, so I'd be quite happy to sacrifice the early morning sun for more evening sun.

      In fact, the ideal would be to have "bedtime" defined as sunset, so define 23:30 as being sunset, and build the rest of the day from that. I accept this would be far too complicated to implement in real life, but any adjustments that bring us closer to that ideal are worth making, imnsho.

    10. Re:meh by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Probably not a big deal. Time just isn't that important.

      A huge number of things depend on not only accurate time, but an accurate conversion of UTC to (local timezone).

      "Depend" as in "Bad things will happen". I don't mean "bad" as in "planes falling out of the sky", but more mundane things like "top executive blows his top because he wasn't alerted of a meeting he was meant to be in until it had just finished... and suddenly that idea to outsource the IT to India because you'd still be getting lousy service but at least you're not paying Western wages starts to sound more appealing" are not at all unreasonable.

    11. Re:meh by icebrain · · Score: 1

      Just, you know, some of use don't like going to work AND coming home from work in the dark.

      Some of us go to work before sunrise all year, DST or not. I work 0600-1630, which means that it's always dark when I'm going to work. That also means traffic is lighter. And, during the summer, it means I actually have a little time to do things after work, even if I stop at the gym on the way home. With DST in effect, it doesn't get dark until 2130 or so, which means I can do things like mowing the lawn, yardwork, other outside chores, ride my bike, etc. during the week, freeing up Fri-Sun for doing other stuff.

      Of course, during the winter, these hours suck--by the time I leave the gym, it's dark. And when I was working in another department that normally went 0700-1730, I never saw daylight at all unless I left the building for lunch. That's part of why I hate winter--it's depressing as shit.

      Basically, due to the hours I work I never have time to do anything in the morning before work. Therefore, it is in my best interest to maximize the daylight time after I leave work, and so I support instituting a permanent, two-hour, year-round DST jump.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    12. Re:meh by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Just, you know, some of us don't want to go to work in the dark.

      Why not? It's not like you get to do anything special with that light, you're on your way to work. You'll get there whether it's light or not. Save the light for after work when you actually have free time to enjoy it.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    13. Re:meh by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the problem is with your employer not allowing flexible working time. The solution of "fixing" the sun seems a bit over-the-top, tbh.

    14. Re:meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably not a big deal. Time just isn't that important. For instance the iPhones have screwed up simple time shifts multiple times, and noone seems that concerned about it.

      That's because people with iPhones (primarily women and idiots) don't have things to do at specific times.

    15. Re:meh by Xest · · Score: 1

      Because when you live in rural Britain, and the sky isn't lit up by city lights, the council is too stingy to fix potholes and the roads are narrow, and where grit is something that's saved for city centres, then when it's icy on a morning in the winter, it's kind of nice to be able to see better where you're going simply so you do not die.

      It's not so bad coming home because the roads have been well travelled through the day and the ice melted off some.

      So here's one for lighter mornings, darker nights. Besides, in the winter it gets dark about two hours before I get home anyway, so I wouldn't get to enjoy it regardless. It'll be the same for most people - it's dark by about 4pm in the middle of winter and most full time workers wont get home until 5 or 6 anyway.

      Really, it's purely about reducing ties to American trade, and improving ties with European trade presumably because they see greater benefit in greater trade with Europe than current trade levels with the US, and I don't mind that so much if there's merit to it for our economy, but I'd rather they stop making shit up like talk of reduced traffic accidents or crime when it just means criminals will change their hours of operation and accidents will happen at a different time- I'd like to see cold hard figures on what the expected gain is for the economy and the evidence backing that view- the fact they've focussed on nonsense claims makes me question the validity of the proposal and makes me wonder if it's just a typical useless pet project with no real merit.

    16. Re:meh by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      I'm from Iceland, and here the "noon" - or the time of day when the sun is at its highest is around 13:30 - this is because we set ourself to GMT standard time.

      It's kind of weird, as the mornings over the winter are very dark, on the other hand you do have more "useful" daylight left.

      I feel it's a better system then daylight savings, which we don't have.

    17. Re:meh by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have as much daylight as possible in the wee early hours of the morning... so I can sleep through it. Then make it dark as early as possible so I can enjoy the evening without the harsh glare of that cancer-maker in the sky.

      I can't wait till our planet is covered with solar panels in orbit and this "daylight" thing is a story we tell our grandchildren.

    18. Re:meh by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Having lived in rural central NY, and commuting 40 minutes to school before sun up in winter, I'd still rather have the daylight in the evening.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    19. Re:meh by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Do the politicos want to cover IT costs for rolling out patches and maintenance for the whole network? If not, I wish them all a happy life. And death in a lithium fire.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    20. Re:meh by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Do the politicos want to cover IT costs for rolling out patches and maintenance for the whole network? If not, I wish them all a happy life. And death in a lithium fire.

      All joking aside, if you're in charge of a network of any significant size and you don't have a nice centralised way of rolling out patches, you either need help, you need to be fired or you need to be shot. Possibly all three.

    21. Re:meh by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      +1

      My preference would be to get rid of the whole concept of time zones altogether, and have everyone use UTC all day, every day. It would make a lot of things an awful lot easier.

      If you want your mornings to be lighter, start the day when it gets light, not when a clock tells you to.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    22. Re:meh by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but there are many devices not meant to be networked, or at least, not be so invasively patched. Not to mention that the patches need to be written. That goes into the rolling out patches calculation. Or at least that happened in my head when I wrote the GP.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  7. *Ka-Ching* Mate! by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the only economy this would stimulate would be the one involving IT Consultants.

    Not that there's anything wrong with that...

    1. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by NtwoO · · Score: 2

      That is indeed a possible reason for the change. Tinkering with time conversion algorithms were in the past also attributed to the economy stimulus it would give the IT sector. That being said, I've read some British press that they want to move to the CET, since that is their main trading zone. A switch which I think will not have the economic effect they might hope for. Countries trading with the UK know there is a time difference and make sure that they handle any issues within the time window. Switching it in bits and bobs, however, is like the joke about the country that decided to change the side the cars drive on. As an experiment they started by switching the trucks to the other side of the road...

      --
      ! /* */
    2. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      There's no need to tinker with time conversion algorithms. They're not introducing new time zones, they're just moving to the same time zone most of the rest of Europe uses. All that it needs is an update changing GB->GMT/BST to GB->CET/CEST. Any software that knows about time zones will already know about CET and CEST. The only programs that are likely to have a problem are ones that hard code the mapping from locales to time zones.

      They keep talking about tourism when they mention stimulus, and I think that's more important than just giving us two hours more overlap with Europe (no one sane schedules a conference call in the first or last hour of the working day if they can possibly avoid it anyway). This gives an extra hour of sunlight in the evening, at the expense of an hour in the morning. This translates to an extra usable hour for doing things outside - more people do things after work than before.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The main reason given for doing it is to make the journey to and from school/work safer by having more usable daylight. It was tried in the 70s and worked very well, but some farmers objected and somehow got their way.

      There are two options on the table at the moment. We could go to GMT+1 with DST as well (so GMT+2 when DST is in effect) or we could just stick with GMT+1 all year. I would prefer the latter and it works well enough in much larger countries like Japan that span multiple time zones.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    4. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Except that in some cases it asks for location and bases everything on that. I select Europe/London, so it sets the time zone to GMT, the currency to £, the language to correctly spelled English and so on. If I select Europe/Paris for example, I would get the CET time zone, but I would also get € and everything in some unintelligible language.

    5. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by LordKronos · · Score: 3, Informative

      That is indeed a possible reason for the change. Tinkering with time conversion algorithms were in the past also attributed to the economy stimulus it would give the IT sector.

      Wonderful. So can we count on the next proposal to be sending someone around to bust out everybody's windows, so that we get an economic stimulus in the window industry? And I think the car tire industry could use a stimulus, so what do you think we could do about that?

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

    6. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Japan has one time zone and does not do "summer time".

    7. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      Isn't that the Broken Window fallacy? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parable_of_the_broken_window

    8. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by tubs · · Score: 1
      Interetingly, there was a report to be published about the trial, but a statistic was leaked that there were more RTA involving children with the darker mornings - this pulled forward the vote in the commons to be fore the report was published, and the change was rejected.

      When the report was published, it did show an increase in the amount of RTA in the morning involving children, but there was also less accidents in the evening - infact there was a larger reduction in the evening accidents than the increases in morning accidents. The momentum for the change had been lost ...

      So the knee jerk reaction by MPs to a percived danger, actually made that danger worse. Good job nothing like that happen any more, knee jerk reactions to perceived problems.

      --

      try to make ends meet, you're a slave to money, then you die

    9. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of busting windows, time changes will break old, obsolete operating systems which no longer receive any OS updates.

    10. Re:*Ka-Ching* Mate! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it actually benefits some parts of the tourism industry, there are some things that only operate in daylight and this change will allow them more operating time. Maybe there are benefits elsewhere as well, but I'm not sure.

  8. Darker mornings by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From TFA:

    Putting the clocks forward by an hour to British Summer Time +1 (equivalent to Greenwich Mean Time +2) would mean lighter evenings in the summer months, but darker mornings.

    Am I the only one who feels utterly miserable going to work in the pitch dark, where the first light of the day I see is the fluorescent tubes above my cubicle?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite a few people find it depressing leaving work several hours after the sun has gone down. Can't please everyone!

    2. Re:Darker mornings by asdf7890 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, but it is nice to occasionally leave the office with some daylight, and so feel like there is some of the day left for yourself after work has taken its pound of flesh.

    3. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No but I imagine you also don't like going home in the dark.

      Anyway, this story is stupid. Just change the time zone on your computer to Europe. That's all that's happening.

    4. Re:Darker mornings by ZombieWomble · · Score: 2

      Not at all. One of the issues with this change is it is largely driven by the English outlook - while it's understandable in terms of population distribution, it means that regions which are further north and west suffer quite seriously in terms of daylight hours. For example, sunrise in N. Ireland is typically about 40 to 45 minutes later than London in winter. If they go through with the most extreme change being discussed (that is, moving to match CET year-round) parts of N. Ireland and Scotland won't see sunrise until well after 9am in winter, which is going to be very unpleasant for a lot of people.

    5. Re:Darker mornings by McHenry+Boatride · · Score: 1

      Good Lord! What time do you go to work in the morning that an extra hour in the Summer would make it pitch dark?

    6. Re:Darker mornings by Mr_Silver · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one who feels utterly miserable going to work in the pitch dark, where the first light of the day I see is the fluorescent tubes above my cubicle?

      I'm the opposite, as in I'd happily trade darker mornings for the opportunity to come home and be able to do more outdoors in the evening.

      It just seems silly to me that it's dark by 4pm.

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    7. Re:Darker mornings by tapanitarvainen · · Score: 1

      Quite a few people find it depressing leaving work several hours after the sun has gone down. Can't please everyone!

      Right. In winter, I go to work before sunrise and leave after sunset, which is pretty depressing. Then again, in summer I go to sleep before sunset and wake up after sunrise, which is pretty nice.

      (I live in Finland, little over 62 degrees North. In mid-winter there's about 4 hours between sunrise and sunset; in midsummer, 20 hours. Here, shifting the clocks for daylight savings never made any real sense, except in synchronizing schedules with other countries. Today, it makes little sense anywhere, and it'd be best to drop the whole practice entirely ASAP.)

    8. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coming from the bar, it always is indeed...

    9. Re:Darker mornings by semi-extrinsic · · Score: 2

      Oh, suck it up. I live at 63N, and we're just now starting to get sunrise around the time we go to work. It's inconvenient, but not "very unpleasant", and if you don't like it just go live on a tropical island.

      --
      for i in `facebook friends "=bday" 2>/dev/null | cut -d " " -f 3-`; do facebook wallpost $i "Happy birthday!"; done
    10. Re:Darker mornings by FTWinston · · Score: 1

      What's so bad about it being dark at night anyway?

    11. Re:Darker mornings by Enigma23 · · Score: 1

      It just seems silly to me that it's dark by 4pm.

      Then fly south for the Winter. ;p

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
    12. Re:Darker mornings by mistralol · · Score: 1

      Being in N.Ireland it normally is daylight by around 9am in the middle of winter. Except for around 2 weeks around the 21st December. However something that would effect us that typically in the longer days in the summer if they were moved by 2 hours instead of 1 would mean on the longest days it would be day light to long after midnight. Being a little further north and being a little further east buys up about 45mins - 1 hour extra daylight time towards the end of the day. Typically in June around here the sun comes up at around 4am and sets at around 11pm :) So we would have 5am -> 12am days. I actually like the idea but only because I do some outdoor water sports in the evenings in the summer. However since the company I work for offer's flexible working hours (up to an hour each way) it really does make a sods lot of difference what the government do. I suspect the people in aberdeen would have some important things to say about it. In winter I think there day light hours are 10am -> 3:30pm or something along thoose lines.

    13. Re:Darker mornings by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "If they go through with the most extreme change being discussed (that is, moving to match CET year-round) parts of N. Ireland and Scotland won't see sunrise until well after 9am in winter, which is going to be very unpleasant for a lot of people."

      Just like it being quite unpleasant to have it be pitch black by the time you come home in the evening. Which is the current situation for large parts of the year, especially in Scotland and Northern Ireland. There is a tradeoff regardless of what you do. But this isn't an "English" thing.

      It is simply based on the fact that most people don't really consider the time between when they get up in the morning and the time they get into work as part of their "spare time". It is simply too short and rushed for that. Thus the change would provide more sunlight during your spare time regardless of where you live in the country. I'm personally all for. I fully respect other opinions, but I think it is a red herring to talk about this as an England vs. Scotland/NI thing.

      Disclaimer: While I live in England, I'm actually from the far north of Norway (70 degrees north), where we have no direct sunlight between November and late January, but rather a short period of dawn/dusk in the middle of the day. Most people suck it up.

    14. Re:Darker mornings by frenchbedroom · · Score: 1

      As the other repliers, I have no problem going to work when it's dark if it means I get more sunshine in the evening. My working hours are supposed to be 9 to 6, but I've settled for 8:30AM - 5:30PM. My coworkers who come in at 10AM and leave at 19PM may get some sun in the morning, but what's the use ? Unless you're getting up really early, it makes no sense. Plus you come home in the dark from October to late March. For me the dark evenings are from November to late February.

    15. Re:Darker mornings by GauteL · · Score: 1

      It seems I misunderstood the article anyway. My argument is based on winter time rather than summer time, which the article suggests they change. Changing summer time sounds rather stupid. People already have plenty of sunlight during their spare time in the summer but none during the winter.

    16. Re:Darker mornings by Arterion · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. If you want to get to work earlier; then go in early. You should make everyone go in early who doesn't want to.

      --
      "That which does not kill us makes us stranger." -Trevor Goodchild
    17. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or is it actually completely insane to arbitrarily change the clock because we don't like when the sun comes up? It's the rotation of the earth. Why don't we just rotate the clock on the wall by 30 degrees?

      I could make a monster list of reasons this is a bad idea in general, but it's like talking to a wall, or explaining an obvious joke. DST _WAS_ an obvious joke until some numbskull politician decided to take it seriously.

      Noon ought to represent, roughly speaking, the sun at its zenith. Yeah, timezones and seasonal shift due to the orbit of the earth, but let's try to be serious here. What's wrong with getting up earlier and going to work earlier, when it is actually a smaller number on the clock? What makes that better by changing what number is on the clock?

      We're not moving the GD sun!

    18. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, which is why I go to work at 10am. Some people in the office prefer lighter evenings and come in at 8am. Nice and simple, everybody's happy. Why do we need to change the clocks?

    19. Re:Darker mornings by Alioth · · Score: 1

      And in any case we shouldn't be on CET because we are not in central Europe, we are in the periphery of western Europe. CET is entirely inappropriate for us.

    20. Re:Darker mornings by youn · · Score: 1

      quite a few people find depressive to go to work period, I say we get robots to work for us and put everyone on permanent vacation... then it would take a while before everyone find a different reason to whine about mondays :)

      --
      Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    21. Re:Darker mornings by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      That's not the problem. It's when they only put them back 1 hour for winter, so winter ends up being GMT+1 rather than GMT, and the winter mornings pitch dark. :-(

      Oh fuck you, Lighter Later campaigners.

    22. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you mate - if you don't like the current situation why don't you fuck off somewhere else?

    23. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider yourself lucky, when I get up in the morning it's dark, and when I leave work it's dark. Since my workplace has no windows, the only light I ever see is fluorescent, until I get home and then it's incandescent. At least on my days off I see daylight. It really is depressing.

    24. Re:Darker mornings by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

      Ask your boss if you can work later hours. If that doesn't work, you can either give up or find a new job, but please don't shove this on the rest of us.

    25. Re:Darker mornings by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Its more than that. I live in the suburbs, and its still pretty dark out on those streets before the time shift in fall, now that they moved it back a couple of hours. As far as I am concerned, its a safty issue - you don't know how many times I have nearly hit kids walking to the bus stop because I simply couldn't see them. People tend to wear darker clothes in the cooler months, and with it dark outside - bad combination.

      And, shoot, doesn't the UK ALREADY stay daylight until 10 or 11 at night in the summer?

      As someone who has to go into work early in the morning, the idea of it still being daylight outside when I am going to bed is a bit unnerving.

      Truthfully, I think this very much reflects our modern mindset too much. Our grandparents would get up at the crack of dawn, and wanted those extra hours in the morning. Modern society prefers to stay up late and sleep in.

    26. Re:Darker mornings by mpe · · Score: 1

      Not at all. One of the issues with this change is it is largely driven by the English outlook - while it's understandable in terms of population distribution, it means that regions which are further north and west suffer quite seriously in terms of daylight hours. For example, sunrise in N. Ireland is typically about 40 to 45 minutes later than London in winter.

      Most of Ireland actually belongs in the GMT -1 timezone.

    27. Re:Darker mornings by mpe · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or is it actually completely insane to arbitrarily change the clock because we don't like when the sun comes up? It's the rotation of the earth. Why don't we just rotate the clock on the wall by 30 degrees? I could make a monster list of reasons this is a bad idea in general, but it's like talking to a wall, or explaining an obvious joke. DST _WAS_ an obvious joke until some numbskull politician decided to take it seriously.

      When the idea was thought up there were probably far fewer clocks than there were people. As opposed to now where it's typically several per person.

    28. Re:Darker mornings by parlancex · · Score: 1

      In Canada we go to work AND return in the dark for almost half the year, even with DST.

    29. Re:Darker mornings by madprof · · Score: 1

      Well I find it unpleasant. I like to have daylight when I get up. Yes you get used to it but it's not nice.

    30. Re:Darker mornings by madprof · · Score: 1

      Um, it's called CET because those were the countries who had adopted it at the time. It's not some restriction on who is allowed to adopt it in future.

    31. Re:Darker mornings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd much rather have sunlight when I am home after work than in the morning on the way to work.

    32. Re:Darker mornings by markdavis · · Score: 1

      No. But I can tell you that in the Winter, that going to work in the dark AND COMING HOME in the dark is REALLY a drag.

      We should all move to DST year-round and just LEAVE IT THERE and stop changing time twice a year, which really screws with my sleep schedule.

    33. Re:Darker mornings by FrankieBaby1986 · · Score: 1

      Screw it, lets just make the work day shorter and call it even!

      --
      ERROR: SIG NOT FOUND (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail?:
    34. Re:Darker mornings by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Certainly works for me. My family (i.e. the cat) would appreciate me being around more to provide entertainment!

    35. Re:Darker mornings by McHenry+Boatride · · Score: 1

      That would be a problem. But that's not the proposal, as I understand it. Ther proposal is for the clocks to go forward 2 hours in the Summer and back to GMT in the Winter.

    36. Re:Darker mornings by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      The US has different time zones to accommodate. In Japan they only have one time zone but work/school starts at different times to accommodate. Either of these options seems reasonable to me.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  9. Two? Just two?! by Adambomb · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you think THAT will help the economy, we're gonna spring forward FIVE FUCKING HOURS. Just think of the unwarranted extrapolations!

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Two? Just two?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why just five? Let's spring forward 24 hours.

    2. Re:Two? Just two?! by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      What anwarranted extrapolation? Just move the clock by 24 hours. Who needs to extrapolate that?

    3. Re:Two? Just two?! by MakinBacon · · Score: 1

      That's crazy talk, imagine what five extra hours of sunlight would do for the global warming crisis!

    4. Re:Two? Just two?! by glimmy · · Score: 2

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oBhPQRZSgUc

      Someone else has thought of that too. (NSFW)

  10. England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    England != UK. Can you lot in the United States of Florida PLEASE try to learn this.

    1. Re:England != UK. by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Given that the proposal only applies to England and the article actually discussees the government's issues with keeping the move unified across the UK, the summary is totally accurate.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does it say it only applies to England? "Britain is set for longer and lighter summer evenings..."

      England is in Great Britain.
      Great Britain is in the UK.

      The article, at most, implies it won't affect N. Ireland (also part of UK, but not GB) but will affect Scotland and Wales (which are both in GB but not in England).

    3. Re:England != UK. by defaria · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you should brush up on your own English there bud. I'm not sure if I could "lot" in anywhere because I don't know how to "lot"!! And a period after Florida would be appropriate here. Geeze!

    4. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, except that as indicated in the first word of TFA, the proposals apply to 'Britain' not 'England'. Therefore you are wrong

    5. Re:England != UK. by osgeek · · Score: 1

      I just don't think we'll ever accept the idea of nested countries. You guys really need to solve your entity roll-up issues and not blame the rest of us for being confused by something that doesn't make much sense.

      Get back to us with a revised ER diagram when you get a chance.

      Thanks,
      The Rest of the World

    6. Re:England != UK. by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if I could "lot" in anywhere because I don't know how to "lot"!!

      His English is correct, but you've parsed the sentence incorrectly. It actually means:

      "Could you, you lot (that is, collection or group) (of people), (who live) in the United States of Florida, please (capitalised for emphasis) try to learn this."

      It's a good idea to make sure you understand what's being written before you attempt to correct it.

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    7. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK but only if you'll admit the metric system isn't the way to go!

    8. Re:England != UK. by Frosty-B-Bad · · Score: 1

      Look, don't feel bad, when we say Russia we typically mean all those other misspelled countries near Russia, the best hope they have is that we divide "Russia" from the EU with Czech Republic and typically that's with some college education and an interest. Heck if we didn't have a conflict in Vietnam they would be called Thailand by default, so on the bright side at least those are friendly countries you have for neighbors and they don't f with our oil addiction so I'd say be happy our we will come spread democracy and "unify" your country(s), your on notice!

    9. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hear! Hear! Glad to hear that someone else is irritated by this ignorance and illiteracy.

      (nice use of pseudo code too)

    10. Re:England != UK. by RingPeace · · Score: 1

      Although you are being funny I would like to point out that in the past the term England was used to refer to the whole of Britain, including the barren wasteland to the north.

    11. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not funny. It is a serious issue for us UK residents who do NOT live in England

    12. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody outside England really cares, actually.

    13. Re:England != UK. by lee1026 · · Score: 1

      As soon as you figure out who the "Yanks" actually are. Hint: The average Brit is much more likely to be English then the average American is to be a Yank.

      Not that we care, mind you. But the people in glass houses should try to throw less rocks.

    14. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then give back Northern Ireland and simplify the whole thing for us.

    15. Re:England != UK. by antdude · · Score: 1
      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    16. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      England !=UK, but England=>85% of the UK population. *ducks*

    17. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This helped me some... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:British_Isles_Venn_Diagram.png

    18. Re:England != UK. by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      You get two levels. We have Florida, a part of the United States. You have England, a part of Britain, a part of Great Britain a part of the United Kingdom, a part of the Commonwealth of Nations.

      And Florida is called a state, and the United States is called a country. Every level with the exception of the Commonwealth is called a country. But only the UK has a foreign policy, to the best of my knowledge, although for some reason the UK gets four teams in FIFA.

      But most seriously, given how other people are likely to be confused, and given our assumption that the UK government would be making daylight savings time rules, I would assume that whomever said England meant the UK.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    19. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And America is much, much more than the USA. Though I don't expect that common mistake to be eradicated any time soon.

      As a Canadian I can only hope.

    20. Re:England != UK. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As soon as you figure out who the "Yanks" actually are.

      Who is "you"? Do you have any evidence that the original AC (not me) has anything to figure out on that subject?

    21. Re:England != UK. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Right after whole country of Americans notices there's a bit more to Americas (both of them) than... their country?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    22. Re:England != UK. by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Well, when it comes to near (like...bordering) with Russia, there's North Korea or, just across somewhat large lake, Iran (apart from Belarus, South Ossettia / Abkhazia, China; all a bit ambiguous)

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  11. Already mostly solved by Virtucon · · Score: 2

    With the DST changes that Congress mandated a few years ago, I think most commercial and Open Source OS's could adapt to this change easily.
    Since we're no longer bound by Railroad timetables, especially in the UK, the concept of standard time and the time zones truly becomes much more localized. What I fear is one day cities will adopt their own time zones rather than regionally. Wouldn't that be fun? It would be like George Carlin's gag.

    "In Baltimore it's 6:42, time for the 11 o'clock report."

    --
    Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    1. Re:Already mostly solved by Timmmm · · Score: 1

      It could definitely be solved, since all that is happening is we are moving to European time (i.e. GMT+1). No changes to the OS are required.

    2. Re:Already mostly solved by Megane · · Score: 1

      Except that those changes only changed the date of the time change. This changes the shift from one hour to two, which has never been done before, ever.

      Smarter DST code already is written around the possibility of the date changing, since it's happened before. But the result has always been "keep the standard time" or "add one hour to standard time".

      The real problem is morons in government thinking that it has any effect on saving energy. The previous meddling by the US congress had no such effect. All it did was cause confusion.

      Now if they want to permanently change their standard (winter) time from GMT to GMT+0100, they can go right ahead, though I suspect the tradition of Greenwich Mean Time will cause some pride-related troubles.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Already mostly solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt that will happen anytime soon. Even if they did, companies within that city would just alter their working hours back to be in sync with the other regions of the UK/wherever they wanted to work with. They do it already with public holidays in large national companies that have offices in different regions of the UK.

    4. Re:Already mostly solved by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      Each city being their own time zone was what drove the adoption of 1-hour wide time zones.

      While currently supported software can readily be up-dated (there's a post farther up which notes this should just be an easily-updated lookup table/file), the problem is for older un-supported systems --- darned nuisance for people doing retro-computing w/ NeXTs, Go Corp. Pen Computers &c.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    5. Re:Already mostly solved by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us never really let go of "City time"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Exchange,_Bristol#Clock

    6. Re:Already mostly solved by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      yeah, at least 1 country changes daylight savings time every year, it's not a big deal except if you're running windows 2k or something

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  12. We tried something similar in the late 60's... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Between 27 October 1968 and 31 October 1971 we set our clocks to be GMT + 1 throughout the year. At first there was an increase in deaths in the morning, but there was also a marked decrease in deaths in the evening. It later turned out that the drink-driving laws were the major cause of the latter, and parliament decided to end the consistent GMT + 1 in a vote of 366 to 81.

    The idea, while good, causes problems as well, and the way we are in the UK with relation to the rest of the EU, we'll possibly keep to BST/GMT as it is now rather than change it.

  13. Even further ahead by MyGirlFriendsBroken · · Score: 1

    I think the bigger impact for some people will be being even further ahead of the US in terms of timezone. At the moment 5 hours is okay, I work with people in the Middle East, Europe, UK and the east coast, from the UK and this is manageable at the moment. I don't start work until about 9 and then work till about 7 or 8 if needed. This gives me a good amount of overlap with everyone. If this goes ahead then I'm going to be have to work later into the evenings sometimes, just negating the increase in outside drinking time, and giving me less quality time with my wife who will be working normal UK hours.

    Nice idea, but not something that is particularly convenient for myself

    --
    If you read a speed reading book, does it take you less time to read the second half?
    1. Re:Even further ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wife is leading the group that WANTS to change.

    2. Re:Even further ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have a wife.

  14. Not if the computer's Unix-ish by Max+Hyre · · Score: 4, Informative
    Unix & friends use a file or set of files with daylight-saving time changes; it's updated everytime somebody changes things. In Debian, it's in the tzdata package, described thus:

    This package contains data required for the implementation of standard local time for many representative locations around the globe. It is updated periodically to reflect changes made by political bodies to time zone boundaries, UTC offsets, and daylight-saving rules.

    Every time (*ahem*) some gov't tweaks the rules, the new info is encoded, and the updated package is sent out. Note that the superseded info is retained, so that if you ask about a time in 1974 in New York City, it'll adjust correctly for the idiotic Nixonian ``let's all go to work in the dark'' time.

    Debian's files live under /usr/share/zoneinfo, and amount to a bit over 6MB of data.

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
    1. Re:Not if the computer's Unix-ish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a little more complicated than that for some systems, for instance with MySQL you periodically have to run mysql_tzinfo_to_sql to load that tzdata information into the lookup tables used by MySQL for the CONVERT_TZ() function.

      It also assumes the programmers haven't assumed anywhere that England only uses GMT and BST and that BST=GMT+1. (I have inherited a system in that past that saw the BST suffix, subtracted 1 hour and gave it the GMT suffix).

    2. Re:Not if the computer's Unix-ish by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      The tzdata package in debian is not exactly "sent out" every time some government tweaks the rules. Especially if you are running debian stable. You can, however, add the "volatile" repository to your /etc/apt/sources.list which is specifically for packages like tzdata that need to be updated more frequently. Oh, actually, this just changed last week for the latest stable release: Debian volatile replaced by new updates suite

    3. Re:Not if the computer's Unix-ish by newbish · · Score: 1

      It's not just operating systems, if the application does reporting or comparisons involving date ranges it most likely will need to implement the Tz database which is available in many languages (ex. Ruby, .NET.)

  15. BST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe programmers in the UK are accustomed to assuming that localtime always equals UTC.

    You are ignorant because you have never heard of British Summer Time.

    And the submitter is a stupid fuck, because it doesn't know about either BST or actually what the y2k issue was.

    1. Re:BST by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      Pro-tip: The above post is true, not troll.

      ****shuffles away muttering about all the digg and fark dinguses infesting slashdot****

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    2. Re:BST by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Pro-tip: The above post is true, not troll.

      Protip: The two are not mutually exclusive.

    3. Re:BST by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

      Protip: The two are not mutually exclusive.

      I'm curious. I can see that in some situations you can already anticipate putting forward the truth is going to upset people, but don't you think that someone's statements being true is a strong defence against assigning them blame for a reaction? I base this on a belief that truth is a valuable aim and therefore in instances of upset, normally side against those that prefer falsehoods.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    4. Re:BST by clang_jangle · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. Unfortunately, it does seem that many people are overwhelmed by our modern society, which I think partially explains the prevalence of people who prefer fairy tales and hate being told the truth (i.e. dogmatic ideologists of whatever stripe).

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    5. Re:BST by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      but don't you think that someone's statements being true is a strong defence against assigning them blame for a reaction?

      Sometimes. Other times, like the post that started it, the content may or may not be true, but it's still worded with the obvious intent to be a douche. Textbook trolling.

    6. Re:BST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So IOW the truth cuts no ice with you, feelings are what matter. Sucks to be you, I guess. The world doesn't give a rat's ass how you feel, but if you don't care about facts you're only screwing yourself.

      --
      Real life -- step up and live it, ya weenie!

  16. DST by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

    Is there even really a point to DST anymore? I just end up having my circadian rhythm thrown off for a while.

    --
    This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:DST by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      People are used to having daylight later in the day in Summer and not in Winter, leading to things like Little League Baseball games being scheduled for when there's seasonal light and parents can be home from work. If people were to retire the time changes, we'd most likely be in a permanent DST arrangement.

    2. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, there is.

      It allows companies a chance to save money on electric lighting.

      You, however, are still screwed.

    3. Re:DST by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just drop all timezones and change the start time at work?

      I personally would have no problem coming into work at 13:00 UTC/GMT and leaving at 21:30. I don't understand why 12:00 has to line up with the middle of the day.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the morons that don't know how to set the time on their alarm clock? i.e. the people proposing the change and most of the population.

  17. Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Man, this again? We get this from the english MPs every other week. This is the same ol' same ol' with a slight variation of +2 in the summer and +$unknown in the winter.
    For the Nth time, this is not going to happen, the rest of the UK wont agree to it. Scotland is much further north than its mild weather would suggest, and when this was tried shortly after the second world war it was an unmitigated disaster. It was dark till lunchtime in the winter in the Shetland Isles, for little gain in the evening in the summer. And remember we almost have 24 hour daylight in Scotland in the summer, we dont need an extra hours daylight at 3am. And neither we, the Northern Irish, nor the Welsh care if it's dark in England 24 hours-a-day all year round ;-)
    Every time the government changes and the Conservatives get in they start going on about this. The 'Tories' are an english party, and in England it gets dark at 10pm in the summer. Boo-hoo. It gets dark in Spain at 9pm in the summer, but they are out having beers till 3am. In England everyone is in their beds at 10pm, what do you want an extra hour of light for? Why do you want it to be light while you are asleep or in your house watching cricket and drinking warm beer or whatever it is you guys do? Especially if it's raining. I may be scottish but I've never seen so much rain as I have in Oxfordshire. No wonder you like your boats, you need them.
    It's not your timezone you want to change, it's your culture. You want to enjoy your evenings more? Get out more, talk to people in bars without waiting for a formal introduction. It doesnt have to be light outside to have a good time.

    Fecking sassenachs. The next time you bring this up we're cutting your power and water.

      I may be scottish and as such slighty biased

    1. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's plenty of English people who think it's a dumb idea too. If they go ahead with it, I'll just leave my clocks set to GMT and insist people state times in GMT.

      The switch to and from BST is already confusing enough -- my clocks handle it fine but my body doesn't and I never remember the switch over dates.

    2. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree - definitely a bad idea. I much prefer to get my sunlight fix through the office windows as the good lord intended. Why would I want to spend an extra hour in the daylight in my garden when I get home? Madness!

    3. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And more to the point, the Tories are an anti-Europe party so why they want to be on the same time as a continent that is a) all east of us and b) they don't like anyway is a bit of a puzzle.

      For me, the increased hour of difference with the USA will be hugely inconvenient while being on Central European time would bring me no benefit.

    4. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can have Tony Blair and Gordon Brown back as well

    5. Re:Not going to happen by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I know this might be a bit a radical - but you could always get your lazy arse out of bed earlier and so finish work earlier!

      Yeah , I know , what a crazy idea!

    6. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll try suggesting to my company that they change their working hours to accommodate that - thanks for the suggestion!

    7. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Mild* weather? WTF???

    8. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they're not really anti-Europe? "Cast iron promise", anyone?

    9. Re:Not going to happen by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find plenty of English people don't want them to change it either.

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

    10. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Scotland is much further north than its mild weather would suggest, and when this was tried shortly after the second world war it was an unmitigated disaster.

      If you look at the statistics for traffic accidents, it saved IIRC about 5000 lives, many of them schoolchildren.

    11. Re:Not going to happen by duguk · · Score: 1

      You're right, twice a bloody year we have this argument, and for months after.

      Who cares? We shouldn't be fucking about with the clocks - stick them at GMT, and whoever it is that's complaining that they don't like going to work in the dark, then go to work an hour later.

      Stop trying to change the time because you can't be arsed to schedule properly. Time isn't meant to be changed.

    12. Re:Not going to happen by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Most companies offer flexitime now with reason. Who do you work for, Scrooge & Sons?

    13. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all about you isn't it sweet pea? If you want a Sunlight fix, get a job that allows you spend more time outdoors! Seems more sensible than changing the clocks so that delays in the bodies natural melatonin production will lead to sleepless nights for a high percentage of the population.

      Not only that but some of us have hobbies that involve concentration or relaxation. We don't want to hear screaming youths or adults out on their decking past 10 o'clock on summer evenings.

    14. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was dark till lunchtime in the winter in the Shetland Isles

      Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so... :-)

    15. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it either. Virtually ALL the population of Canada lives at lower latitudes than the UK, the UK being roughly at the latitude of Labrador (which on this side of the Atlantic is fricking far north, climate-wise). We get by just fine here with +1 hour daylight savings time. More than that would be ridiculous. As it is, when I was working in Calgary (that's Calgary, Alberta, not Calgary, Scotland) in the summer it was light until almost 10pm. Coincidentally Calgary is about the latitude of London, and neither the dark nor the substantially colder winter weather stops people from going out for their beers in the evening. So why in heck would you need another hour of light again?

      Don't MPs have more important things to legislate than stupid ideas like this?

    16. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no clue what cold weather actually is, do you? Mainland Europe of all places tends to have at least as harsh winters than Scotland typically does. Head across to southern Germany in the winter and then compare it with Glasgow. Glasgow is frequently wet and dismal and the temperature might dip to the stunning lows of -2 or -3. Southern Germany is bitterly cold and snowy and temperatures may climb to the balmy highs of -2 or -3 but are more likely around -5 or -6 for a few months.

      This is the result of Britain's *maritime climate* which gives us warm and mild winters and cool and damp summers, relative to the *continental climate* suffered by pretty much the rest of the civilised world. If you really think Britain doesn't have mild weather you're a fucking idiot and should look outside your provincial little borders one of these days.

    17. Re:Not going to happen by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Or, possibly, like me: a company which has to visit other people, and so has to have people in when others are in. Which is normally 9 - 5

      OR a company whcih has to provide fixed hours of support, like my partners company. He leaves at 7pm and is in at 7am, so extra hours of daylight going home makes a lot of sense

    18. Re:Not going to happen by emailgregn · · Score: 1

      Ahh, the old "think of scottish children" argument? If the 32 inhabitants of Loch Bleakypeat want to opt out, here's the answer http://www.scottish.parliament.uk/ ?

    19. Re:Not going to happen by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      No doubt from the same statistics office that today puts out spin about how speed cameras save lives when all the research shows they make no difference at all.

    20. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You won't mind if we cut you off entirely then. Lets see how you do without any jobs or funding from England.
      Good luck.

    21. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      extra hours of daylight going home makes a lot of sense

      As much sense as everyone scurrying off to the workplace or school, bleary-eyed and before sunrise? As much sense as getting out of bed at 4 GMT in the pitch black?

    22. Re:Not going to happen by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Every time the government changes and the Conservatives get in they start going on about this. The 'Tories' are an english party, and in England it gets dark at 10pm in the summer. Boo-hoo. It gets dark in Spain at 9pm in the summer, but they are out having beers till 3am. In England everyone is in their beds at 10pm, what do you want an extra hour of light for? Why do you want it to be light while you are asleep or in your house watching cricket and drinking warm beer or whatever it is you guys do? Especially if it's raining. I may be scottish but I've never seen so much rain as I have in Oxfordshire. No wonder you like your boats, you need them.

      If it's nearly always light in Scotland, what difference does it make to shift time a bit in the summer? If it extends daylight in southern parts then that is good for a raft of reasons - tourism, lower energy consumption, and just the ambient good feeling of being sat outside drinking beer at 10pm and it still being light.

      Personally I think the government needs to set a timezone which optimizes daylight during waking hours all year around. Screw farmers and people living on remote islands and consider what benefits the majority of the population.

    23. Re:Not going to happen by Damnshock · · Score: 1

      It gets dark in Spain at 9pm in the summer, but they are out having beers till 3am.

      Could that be related to... *temperature*?

      In Spain is *HOT* in the summer. That's the reason why 75% of the country kinda lives at night (summer time at least).

      Regards

    24. Re:Not going to happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And neither we, the Northern Irish, nor the Welsh care if it's dark in England 24 hours-a-day all year round ;-)

      Apologies for my 'sense-of-humour malfunction' but for those not familiar with UK geography, England extends further north than Northern Ireland (Belfast is south of Carlisle) and Wales (Cardiff is about level with London) and so 24 hour dark in England would also mean 24 hour dark in Northern Ireland and The Wales.

      Additionally, neither the Welsh nor the Northern Irish moan anywhere near as much as the Scots, must be those dark winters.

    25. Re:Not going to happen by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because time after work ends is inherently better than time before work; you can get more done. More hours of daylight when it is more useful makes more sense.

      The vast majority of people already commute (into London at any rate) before dawn in winter anyway, so it makes NO DIFFERENCE to them.

    26. Re:Not going to happen by teh+kurisu · · Score: 1

      It's not a very good answer though, because the Scottish Parliament doesn't have power over time zones. It's a matter reserved to Westminster. England could unilaterally decide to move the whole of the UK to Central European Time, and we Scots wouldn't be able to do a damn thing about it.

      I'm sure the majority of Scots don't give a stuff what time zone England uses, as long as we are able to opt out of any change. The problem is that there are plenty or politicians both north and south of the border, who would see the division of the UK into multiple time zones as a step towards Scottish independence, and would oppose it on that basis alone.

    27. Re:Not going to happen by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      How about Swatch Internet Time? Though administration and corporate don't know how to schedule, period.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  18. Never touch a running system? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    I would also like to point out that these things are much more likely to break down the more frequently you change them.

    I think that sums it up best . . .

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Never touch a running system? by shallot · · Score: 2

      I would also like to point out that these things are much more likely to break down the more frequently you change them.

      I think that sums it up best . . .

      OTOH, if people changed these things more frequently, things in general would become less likely to break down, because everyone would become more accustomed to it. We would then be able to relegate those people who allow it to break down to the same caste we today relegate the "what do you mean someone can insert random SQL in my obviously numeric GET parameter?!" people. They would still exist, but nobody would really pay attention to their screams :)

    2. Re:Never touch a running system? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Right, the issue here is of course that if you're writing a random biz app for internal or external use chances are you'll want to use the date and time functions/classes that are supplied to you by the tools you use (or your boss will fire you for wasting time writing an implementation that doesn't require a vendor patch to function properly).

      Not to mention legacy systems or systems that handle date and time information in such a way that any changes like this pretty much require manual intervention in order to make the data generated fit into reality.

      Now consider that MS still hasn't understood how to properly handle ISO 8601 week numbering (used extensively in Europe) or the countless software development toolchains out there that to this day assume that Sunday is the first day of the week. Do you really want people to keep changing the rules for these things more often?

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    3. Re:Never touch a running system? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I'd like them to change it once. An extra hour of daylight in the evenings all year around in Britain will have enough benefits for millions to outweigh the whining of a few software engineers having an extra job to do.

      It's not as if it's a hard change. All places in Britain will always have the same time as France.

    4. Re:Never touch a running system? by AGMW · · Score: 1

      ... All places in Britain will always have the same time as France.

      And there you have it, in a nut shell. It's no secret that France has long wanted the Meridian to pass through Paris, where other items that define weights and measure reside, so they can all be in one (*ahem* French *ahem*) place.

      Once we don't use Greenwich Mean Time the next step will be for France to re-name Paris as "Greenwich", then they'll subtly move the meridian and the world, nay, Le Monde, will now be based on French Time ... La Belle Time Francaise! Then we'll see how much use that extra hour in the evening is!

      Just Say Non!

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    5. Re:Never touch a running system? by jc42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's no secret that France has long wanted the Meridian to pass through Paris, where other items that define weights and measure reside, so they can all be in one (*ahem* French *ahem*) place. Once we don't use Greenwich Mean Time the next step will be for France to re-name Paris as "Greenwich", ...

      Heh. Apparently the French (and probably a lot of Brits, too) haven't heard that GMT hasn't been used for a quarter century now. The Greenwich Observatory got out of the time standard business back in 1986 (google it), when the official time standard was redefined in a way that wasn't dependent on any place or artifact, and renamed "UTC". Since then, "GMT" has been nothing more than a mispelling of "UTC", usually by someone who doesn't understand the difference.

      Actually, if you visit the Greenwich Observatory, you'll find that they do have a nice museum exhibit of the history of their time standard, as well as a number of other good exhibits. It's well worth spending a day of your vacation there. Or visit their nice web site (www.nmm.ac.uk).

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    6. Re:Never touch a running system? by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Maybe if they moved the Prime Meridian...

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    7. Re:Never touch a running system? by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Sunday has always been the first day of the week in Western calendars and quite a few Eastern. Just because an ISO standard a couple of years ago changed it doesn't mean much. If an ISO standard changed daytime to start at 18:00 it would also be mostly ignored..

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    8. Re:Never touch a running system? by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      That's strange, because I can't remember the week ever starting on Sundays. For at least the better part of the 20th century Saturday and Sunday were the weekend with Monday through Friday being the regular weekdays, Monday being the first day of the week and Sunday being the last.

      But I'm sure there's some "jesus-y" explanation for why Sunday is the first day of the week, and I'm sure that some American will be happy to tell me about it (I know I've gotten such lectures before although I can't remember exactly why it was oh so important that the entire world bend to the will of a handful of post-messianic jews in North America when it came to this issue).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    9. Re:Never touch a running system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm, prior to the adoption in 1978 by France and the UK (among others) of Coordinated Universal Time as the standard atomic-clock timescale for civil time, France's civil time was "l'heure de temps moyen de Paris retardée de 9 min 21 sec" (per the law of 9 march 1911). GMT was of course delayed by a further hour from Paris Mean Time.

      Paris Mean Time and GMT, while both based on long term averaging of solar observations (and thus more fundamentally to the rotation of the earth), were slightly different timescales. Both were simultaneously superseded by UT, which is a timescale maintained by the International Earth Rotation (and Reference Systems) Service, which is distributed among several of the former maintainers of astronomical civil timescales (e.g. the Greenwich Observatory, the U.S. Naval Observatory, and the Paris Observatory). UT1 is a continuation and refinement of the Paris Mean Time standard, and accounts for as many of the Earth's motions as possible, relating them to distant objects which appear to us to be in fixed positions with respect to one another (these are mainly quasars and high-red-shift galaxies).

      UTC (Coordinated Universal Time) is an approximation of UT1 using highly stable frequency standards (e.g. atomic clocks, H2 masers). Since UTC is much easier to predict than UT1, non-astronomers generally use UTC.

  19. Its happened in other places. by samson13 · · Score: 1

    Australia stuffed around with daylight savings dates for the Olympics. Most distributions pushed updates with enough time that it wasn't a problem. I saw a few Windows servers that weren't patched miss the change. A few TV stations didn't make the update in time but that happens with DST normally. Some outlook calendar entries misbehaved.

    Postgres is always unhappy with countries that stuff around with this since causes extra entries in the lookup table.

    Mostly it works and mostly it doesn't matter and its fixed manually in a day or two when somebody notices.

  20. Another hour offset sounds good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another hour offset sounds good--just let it be in the opposite direction.

  21. 1940 by WillKemp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, the UK, where reinventing the wheel is a daily occurrence!

    However, given the British obsession with world war two, this may be an appropriate move - it will be like returning to 1940-1945, when they had "double summer time", mainly so people could work in their gardens, growing vegetables, after they got home from work. Somehow, i don't think this is what they'll be using the extra hour of evening daylight for this time round though - it will be simply an excuse to get more drunk in the evening (if that's possible).

    1. Re:1940 by igb · · Score: 1

      Double summer time was also experimented with in the early 1970s. Some of us are old enough to remember this.

    2. Re:1940 by WillKemp · · Score: 1

      I remember it. But i'm not sure you do! It was British Standard Time - 1 hour ahead of GMT all year round - which brought the UK in line with nearby European mainland countries.

    3. Re:1940 by Shimbo · · Score: 1

      I'm not quite old enough to remember it; I do remember putting localtime(0) in a test case once though, and spending ages wondering why it didn't give the expected results.

    4. Re:1940 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do, started in 1968 - my primary school issued us with reflective armbands so we'd be more visible to motorists in the dark mornings.

      I'll be leaving for work in the dark all year round if they do this - better dig out those armbands...

    5. Re:1940 by trigpoint · · Score: 1

      I would have been 9 or 10 at that time, I used to walk to school and can remember all the fuss but I am pretty certain I never walked to school in the dark. But maybe living 10 mins walk from the school was the reason for that.

    6. Re:1940 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am American so I am not totally understanding this. Why is additional sunlight somehow tied to additional drinking time in England? I am from NYC we don't even go out to start drinking until 10pm when its already dark out at any point in the year.

    7. Re:1940 by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      I've always wondered why we have to pretend the time is different, rather than just try to encourage businesses to simply start an hour earlier. Further, the real energy sop is the traffic during the commute, which is not helped by simply shifting everyone to a new hour. Spreading out the commute would be a far more commendable goal.

      Anyway, when we in the US moved up DST by months, I thought we finally proved once and for all that the only bit of the economy stimulated by the change is the software companies who provide updated time zone data to their clients.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    8. Re:1940 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the UK, but here in the USA I've not needed sunlight to get drunk.

    9. Re:1940 by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Uh, why not just change the work hours?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
  22. Two hours? Boring! Try 2:37 (hours : minutes) by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 2

    That should totally screw people up and result in total confusion.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  23. Oops---misparented by Max+Hyre · · Score: 1

    The above comment should have been in reply to the first comment, asking about Y2K-like problems.

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
  24. Of course it will cause problems by thogard · · Score: 2

    The Australian government likes to mess with the day light offset for sporting events and I think they gave everyone a whole 5 weeks advanced notice a few years back. You get to the point where you just tell computer clocks to keep a common offset and then go change it twice a year.

    There are some master time zone files that can be found here:
    ftp://elsie.nci.nih.gov/pub/
    On Unix like system you can run a command like # zic australasia (or whatever zone is messed up.. or just run them all).

    Then things should work.
    Here is a script I wrote up to test this sort of nonsense about half a decade ago....
    http://www.abnormal.com/~thogard/timezone.shtml

  25. Yawnnn.... by ckeo · · Score: 2

    Why dont everyone just switch to metric time and get it over with :|

    1. Re: Yawnnn.... by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      Because it's weird.

      Ten years ago I had the Swatch sponsored ".beat" applet on my website and not more than 5 people out of every thousand clicked on it to see what it was.

      How did old farts (oh, people the age we are now) cope with changing over to decimalisation in the 70s? Badly; we still use miles and some people use inches and pounds (lbs, not £). I was taught in metric at school, but I had to learn about the old stuff when I started work because the time needed to change something like that is apparently more than 40 years. I imagine time would take even longer even if they were to start teaching it in schools tomorrow.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    2. Re: Yawnnn.... by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      which is why we have to start now. Saying that something takes a long time is not a good reason to put off starting it.

    3. Re: Yawnnn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What problem does "metric time" solve? The costs and difficulties are clear, but where's the benefit?

      Also, how do you deal with the number of days in a year? Seems like you can't redefine either the length of a day, or the length of a year. Any suggestions?

    4. Re: Yawnnn.... by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

      To quote myself "It's weird".

      Nobody has any interest in it was the most salient point of my post.
      The clock isn't a problem waiting for a solution. Unless you count the fact that most Americans (in my experience) are unable to take 12 away from the afternoon/evening/night hours on a clock and work out what the old fashioned time is.

      --

      Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
    5. Re: Yawnnn.... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Or we could just switch to decimal time and lengthen the workweek...

    6. Re: Yawnnn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I agree entirely. I also think you can say the same about weights and measures; again, not really a problem waiting for a solution. The issues with the imperial system seem to amount to (1) intermediate units that are poorly understood (hundredweights, furlongs, chains, that sort of thing), and (2) measures that aren't standard around the world (US gallon versus imperial gallon). Seems like these could have been fixed by a deprecation process in which such units are phased out, rather than a complete replacement bearing no relationship to the sorts of units people actually want to use.

  26. Lighter Later by flurdy · · Score: 1

    This was suggested by the Lighter Later campaign of last year. Basically by having brighter evenings the country saves a lot on electricity and heating etc.

    While being on the same timezone as the rest of western europe would simplify business and tourism, the main benefits is for the population to enjoy their post work / school hours in a better, lighter way...

    As for it being dark in the morning, I don't really care. My alarm clock wakes my body up but my mind is not working untill lunchtime anyway, when the caffeine really kicks in. In the summer it is light at 5am or earlier which makes no sense to the general population.

    --
    My other Sig is very funny.
    1. Re:Lighter Later by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      This was suggested by the Lighter Later campaign [lighterlater.org] of last year. Basically by having brighter evenings the country saves a lot on electricity and heating etc.

      The problem is that there is no evidence that does indeed happen. As a matter of fact a couple of recent studies in the U.S. indicate the reverse. A few years back several states (I believe it was Indiana and Arizona, but I'm not sure) that previously had not used DST, switched to the same DST as the majority of the country. There was enough advance warning that someone decided to study the effects of the change. They discovered that electricity usage rose after the switch to DST.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    2. Re:Lighter Later by flurdy · · Score: 1

      The Lighter Later lists a whole bunch of benefits http://www.lighterlater.org/benefits.html with detailed research references. Such as less drastic 447,000 tonnes less CO2, save 100 lives, new jobs, cheaper NHS.

      Not too discredit the findings from those switched in the US, but there may be many external reasons for their increased electricity use. Such as electricity use increases in general irrespective of DST switches or not. Maybe the increase would just be less with a DST switch, or perhaps not. Or.. if it is lighter later, there may be more barbecues etc.. Actually that would be charcoal / gas increase....

      --
      My other Sig is very funny.
    3. Re:Lighter Later by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      The references at the link you gave appear to be primarily projections of savings based on observed behavior and then projecting how much energy would be consumed with that behavior at the same time if it was still light at that time rather than actual studies of changes in behavior as a result of changes in DST (or whatever the locals choose to call the time shift). That is, they observed that certain behaviors occur later in the day, therefore they conclude if we shift the clock so that it is still light at that time, people will use less energy while doing these behaviors. However, they does not address the question as to whether shifting the clock so that it is still light at a later hour will cause people to shift their behaviors to even later in the day.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
  27. It's been done before by Max+Hyre · · Score: 3, Informative

    During WW II, Britain adopted Double Summer Time, skipping ahead two hours. It reverted to one hour after the war (modulo some funkiness a year or so later).

    --
    I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
    1. Re:It's been done before by Megane · · Score: 1

      But that was even before the transistor was invented. It's one thing when everyone is manually turning knobs of the two clocks in the house, and pushing paper around. It's another thing when you have dozens of clocks around you, and computers constantly talking to each other. Plus, we now have dozens of clocks around us, many of which we don't notice because they know how to change to DST automatically.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:It's been done before by Max+Hyre · · Score: 1

      True---I keep a list on my Palm Pilot of those clocks around the house that need resetting. The current count is nineteen, not including the ones that handle the transition themselves, and I need it to avoid gaslighting myself. (There was that year I took my daughter to Sunday school an hour early....)

      --
      I refuse to believe corporations are people until Texas executes one. -- desert rain on http://www.dailykos.com/user/
  28. Screws up transatlantic business by mouthbeef · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm a UK taxpayer and I conduct a lot of business with the US west coast. Presently, we're 8 hours apart for most of the year, and that means that I can *just barely* squeeze in a conference call with Californian colleagues (I'm co-owner of boingboing.net and all my partners are in LA and San Francisco) and still get out of the office in time to get my daughter from day-care and get home for dinner.

    If the timezone difference goes to 9 hours, I'm buggered. The additional hour will have a direct, negative impact on my net income, as it will either require me to participate less in these transatlantic ventures (for example, it would probably mean no more freelance assignments for US editors, all of which generate UK taxes) or hire expensive babysitters to fetch the kid from day-care (something I also would rather not do for sentimental reasons having nothing to do with the economy).

    1. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the other hand for me, as a UK taxpayer working mainly with UK and european colleagues, it means more overlap time at work and I will get more daylight time to spend with my kids in the evening. So the economy and my kids will benefit, and there are more UK people in my situation than in yours.

      As a side note, the US bandwagon is over, there's a bigger world out there, expand your horizons!

    2. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If the timezone difference goes to 9 hours, I'm buggered. The additional hour will have a direct, negative impact on my net income, as it will either require me to participate less in these transatlantic ventures or hire expensive babysitters to fetch the kid from day-care.

      ...and your point is?

    3. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife lives and works global. Sometimes she goes a bit late to office because she do a meeting over VPN before leaving home. Other times she do a meeting after dinner and a rest in the evening.

      Other people she has been working with on various locations like other variations.

      It might be pain if it is done a lot, but otherwise I wold say it seems OK. Home office does make this situations more doable.

    4. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      also it makes no difference to anything.

      businesses can already - and do - adjust their timetables accordingly, you know that plenty of people already leave to work at 6 am and plenty already leave for work at 10am.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I conduct a lot of business with the US west coast

      The US is yesterday's market. These days it's all about China, India and so on; which are in the opposite direction. It's a positive adjustment for a modern world. Get with the times ;)

    6. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by brunes69 · · Score: 1

      It's a conference call... why can't you just leave work at 16:00 or 16:30 to pick up your kids, and join the call from your house at 17:00 or 17:30 ? What difference is it if you join from your home or office?

    7. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by N1AK · · Score: 1

      Or you'll have to get a bit more imaginative at finding solutions like anyone currently working with the Far East and Australasia does. It's not that I don't care about the inconvience this would cause you, I just don't care about it anymore than the inconvience the current system causes others. I find it very difficult to care about whether it happens or not, both options have merit and will suit different people and geographical parts of the UK better/worse.

      For example, could you possibly leave work an hour earlier, and then put in an hour at home later on if you need to talk to people on the West Coast? If you're already having the conference calls at the end of the day you're not actioning it until the following day anyway? (I'm sure you're smart enough to work it out for yourself, and I hope, if this does happen, you can find a solution that works for you).

    8. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lordy, lordy we can't possibly do anything that has a negative imapct on mouthbeef's net income. Phew, that's the problem solved then.

    9. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by duguk · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just get up an hour earlier?

    10. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      The children playing and yelling in the background?

    11. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point - and since we value our "special relationship" so much, you'd think with that timezone difference, we would all have a little less time to suckle from the US teat quite as much as our "special relationship" allows at the moment.

      Then again... maybe this is intentional, as a way for us to deal with our European neighbours a little more often...?

    12. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      He's already leaving his child in "daycare" and talking about how important his income is to the UK economy. I think we can all see where his priorities are.

      I've worked in the house on and off for years when I've had caring responsibilities. It's tough, but (providing your job makes it physically possible) mostly it requires you to actually not want to make an excuse for not doing it.

    13. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tough titties. Just because you can't be bothered to run your day later, you think the entire country should follow what is convenient for you? If you were really a buisnessman, you wouldn't be clocking out at 17:00. You can quite easily pick up your kid, do dinner and still have plenty of time to deal with CA.

    14. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by GauteL · · Score: 1

      "The additional hour will have a direct, negative impact on my net income, as it will either require me to participate less in these transatlantic ventures (for example, it would probably mean no more freelance assignments for US editors, all of which generate UK taxes) or hire expensive babysitters to fetch the kid from day-care (something I also would rather not do for sentimental reasons having nothing to do with the economy)."

      Hardly. It means going home earlier and doing your conference call from home rather than at work. Hardly the end of the world.

    15. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by pstorry · · Score: 2

      The City of London won't like it for similar reasons.

      Various exchanges open at 07:00 around the world, local time. Which gives London a 1 hour edge on the rest of Europe for trading.
      Combine that with your observations on scheduling, and the fact that we speak English, and you've got the three reasons as to why London is treated as the "gateway to Europe" by many businesses.

      Get rid of that, and you have to ask why you wouldn't just deal through somewhere like Madrid...

    16. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Do they not have doors in Europe?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    17. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got that backwards. Frankfurt is one hour ahead of London. Sun rises in the East, etc.

      Additionally, Frankfurt is definitely in Europe; London isn't so sure about itself. Not to mention the Euro currency. As a new company, you already have plenty of reasons to shy London.

    18. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      Doors that keep out the noise of yelling children? I don't think such a thing exists anywhere.

    19. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Hardly. It means going home earlier and doing your conference call from home rather than at work. Hardly the end of the world.

      Hello? Yes, I wanted to talk with you about that ... Kevin, don't disturb me, I'm on the phone! ... Sorry, my kid. OK, what I wanted to ask you ... Dennis, stop that! ... Dennis! I said, stop that! ... What I wanted to ask you is about that point you mentioned yesterday ... Kevin, give that back to Dennis! ... OK, sorry, where did I stop? Ah yes, that point you mentioned yesterday about ... Kevin! Stop playing with that! ... about that possible change ... No Dennis, I cannot play with you now. ... OK, what I wanted to ask you ... Hello? ... Are you still there?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    20. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Surely they would be shouting, not yelling. American children yell. No other shildren in the world do this.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    21. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Uh, So that he can chat with his colleagues in San Francisco at 10PM instead of 11PM at night (their time)?

      If you are a consultant then you do business on your customers hours. Those are fixed by the times in the country you do business with. If your own government sets crazy DST rules you just get to be the big bad boss who schedules his employees to work until 6PM.

    22. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by rastoboy29 · · Score: 1

      Not a problem--if they move the clocks forward by two hours, just move your own "hours of operation" *back* by two hours.  Done.

      Dude srsly think outside the box! lol.  Not much of a box here rilly...

    23. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because everyone's in London?

    24. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by cortana · · Score: 1

      So why not open the LSE at the same actual *time* and ignore this political tomfoolery?

    25. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by duguk · · Score: 1

      Uh, So that he can chat with his colleagues in San Francisco at 10PM instead of 11PM at night (their time)?

      If you are a consultant then you do business on your customers hours. Those are fixed by the times in the country you do business with. If your own government sets crazy DST rules you just get to be the big bad boss who schedules his employees to work until 6PM.

      Exactly my point; so why change the time for all (along with all the negative effects it causes), when workers, students and employers all should work at the times that best suit them and their needs.

      What difference does it make if its called 10PM or 11PM, if in reality it's still the same time anyway?

    26. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by michelcolman · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected.

    27. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Well, they wouldn't be meeting at either 10PM or 11PM - they would be meeting in the local afternoon. The suggestion was to come in an hour earlier, and my point was that if anything they'd have to stay an hour later.

      The problem is that most business/etc follow the local time. Sure, having to be at work at 6AM is the same whether you call it 6AM or 8AM. However, if the bus picks up your kids at 7AM then in practice it makes a really big difference whether you need to leave at 5:30 or 7:30 to get to work, even if they're really the same physical time.

    28. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by duguk · · Score: 1

      You're missing the problem entirely, all these complaints are in regards to when it's daylight. Setting time via the sun clearly isn't suitable - and fewer people are working standard hours. Working an hour later/coming in an hour early is irrelevant if it has to be done at any rate; simply calling it a different number changes nothing.

      Remember that the original purpose was to save energy, I doubt it has so much of an effect these days - US Department of Energy concluded in 2005 that DST resulted in a decrease of electricity consumption of 0.03%.

      The cost of daylight savings varies greatly, but even this estimate suggests $480 million. Not only that, it disrupts body clocks and is an inconvenience for travelers and daily life.

      Any sane programmer, mathematician or physicist would surely agree that changing your base measurement unit arbitarly every 6 months is a little crazy.

    29. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      So, these are all arguments for banning summer hours entirely, and not for making it two hours vs one.

      I'm in full support of getting rid of summer hours / DST for all the reasons you suggest. I don't like the idea of a two-hour jump, because it still has all the costs associated with having any change at all, and yet it puts the country that much more out of sync with how everybody else does things.

    30. Re:Screws up transatlantic business by duguk · · Score: 1

      So, these are all arguments for banning summer hours entirely, and not for making it two hours vs one.

      Sorry, perhaps I wasn't clear enough with:

      What difference does it make if its called 10PM or 11PM, if in reality it's still the same time anyway?

      Why not just make the day 20 seconds shorter before midsummer, and 20 seconds longer after. That'd make more sense than this ridiculous idea.

  29. Pointless by Grantbridge · · Score: 1

    If you want to get an extra hour of daylight in the evening....get up earlier? Why does the government have to mandate a change, schools / jobs in England can just start 1 hour earlier if they want the sunlight, and the rest of the UK can carry on as before. Problem solved! With on demand TV, its not like the TV schedules matter any more...

  30. Tsk, tsk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's DST hell -- just a little more sadistic.

    The problem is not the computer, nor Y2K-like bugs, not ven the programmers as professionals... the problem are those obnoxious things we call "persons".

    I, unfortunately, am one of those who suffer during DST. People use to say "you'll get used to it", but after some years through these hellish period, I can say I never get used at all. In fact, it just worsens to the day it ends (fortunately, yesterday we left DST to return to normal time -- after 1 night better slept I already feel amazingly better!).

    I don't know how I can solve this. In the latter years I've been abandoning DST: I just wake up one hour later, which make a lot less productive and I get to leave work with sunlight still available -- which I don't care at all, since I'm a nighttime guy... "hello darkness, my old friend".

    Just to say this is one of the biggest idiocies they can do to UK, but hey, who am I? Just a foreigner! What can I possibly know? Go on! Do it! Enjoy it!

  31. Embedded Controls will have a problem with this by ultrasound · · Score: 1

    It may not be a problem for high end hardware, but lower end embedded controls with real-time clocks often use hard coded DST algorithms. For example the EU has defined standard DST dates for years in advance, these change-over dates are often hard coded into low-end devices, but with a default +1 advance. This allows a simple hardcoded table to be added to the hardware without the need for any user configuration, other than setting the initial time and date. Short sighted perhaps, but the reality is that there are huge numbers of these types of devices already installed.

    There are lots of embedded controls used for time scheduling control of HVAC, Lighting and other timed automatic controls with this level of technology. I can foresee huge problems with equipment needing to be replaced or firmware upgraded if this occurs, or the need for 6 monthly manual time changes.

    1. Re:Embedded Controls will have a problem with this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see a great opportunity to bring people better, smarter devices that match their preferences as if by magic!

    2. Re:Embedded Controls will have a problem with this by Megane · · Score: 1

      but with a default +1 advance.

      It's not a default, it's the only way things have ever been done. Nobody uses a +2 summer time advance, and I don't think anyone ever has. "Default" implies that there's a number you can change. Currently everything uses a boolean "DST on" (+1 in summer) or "DST off" (+0 year-round). You can't wedge a third number into a boolean. (unless you're a regular on thedailywtf.com in which case booleans have a third value of FILE_NOT_FOUND).

      If they just want to go CET, that's been tried before and it didn't last long before everyone wanted to go back.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    3. Re:Embedded Controls will have a problem with this by DamonHD · · Score: 1

      Remember that various places have no DST at all, the solution I'd prefer. GMT/UTC year-round in the UK would be my choice. Let businesses and schools adjust their hours if they really must, preferably to follow daylight so we don't expend vast amounts of energy on lighting and artificial rush-hours for which there really is no fundamental need. (Ie do less in the winter and more in the summer when the light/energy is around, which would also help with balancing and electricity grid with more renewables.)

      It'll be somewhat silly IMHO to never have GMT at Greenwich, but there you go.

      Rgds

      Damon

      --
      http://m.earth.org.uk/
  32. Not just you scots by Viol8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its not just you scots who don't want it, plenty of us english arn't too happy either!

    I don't much care if its dark when I drive home from work , I'm already awake and have lots of coffee inside me. What I DONT want is it pitch black first thing in the morning when I'm half asleep trying to drive down dark roads with kids trying to get to school crossing said dark roads.

    Why the fuck our politicians want this I have no idea. We're more north west than all of the rest of western europe bar ireland which means the time our sun rises and sets bares little resemblence to what happens in germany 500 miles east or france 200 miles south.

    Also , can someone explain whats the point of a clock if it doesn't give at least a rough approximation of the real time?

    1. Re:Not just you scots by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I completely agree. This stuff makes my blood boil, and the mainstream media only ever put the "let's move clocks forward" side of the story, as if nobody opposed it. Leave my fucking GMT *ALONE*!

    2. Re:Not just you scots by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Also , can someone explain whats the point of a clock if it doesn't give at least a rough approximation of the real time?

      Care to explain what "the real time" is? Hours/minutes/seconds/time of day are just a constructs humans came up with, not inherent qualities of the universe.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    3. Re:Not just you scots by Viol8 · · Score: 2

      Umm , midday is the middle of the day - ie when the sun it at its zenith, mid night is equidistant between 2 middays.

      I know its all a bit confusing for the hard of thinking who confuse the units of time with actual time. HTH.

    4. Re:Not just you scots by crimperman · · Score: 1

      +1 for English ppl against any such move.

      Aside from that though we should remember that this crap appears (mostly) from the right wing press pretty much every time the clocks change. This story is just that - a story. The other key indicator is the "plan to scrap May Day" rubbish that is rolled out everytime a Tory government gets in.

    5. Re:Not just you scots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what is the "real time," if I might ask?

    6. Re:Not just you scots by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Wow, nice response. Asshole.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    7. Re:Not just you scots by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Actually its spelt "arsehole". HTH.

  33. Why stop at 2 hours? by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I mean if our politicians really don't see why clocks should tell a good approximation of the actual time why just 2 hours? Why not move them forward 12 hours and then it can be dark while we work but we'll have a nice bright nighttime for all those whingers to go out and have their cappucinos at 11pm or whatever the hell it is they want to do in the light late at night.

    Sorry , but I don't see the point of daylight saving AT ALL. Contrary to what some morons seem to believe we (surprise!) don't get an extra hour of daylight. The real problem isn't the time, its the fact that the working day is spread unevenly around midday. If everyone started work at 8am and finished at 4pm then this wouldn't be an issue. If you really need the extra light in the evenings get up earlier - thats all you're doing anyway when the clocks go forward!

    1. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If everyone started work at 8am and finished at 4pm then this wouldn't be an issue.

      You probably live on a tropical zone. In central/northern UK the sun rises at 4am during the summer, according to your plan that is more than 3 hours of sun wasted.

    2. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry , but I don't see the point of daylight saving AT ALL

      Clearly you haven't spent a summer living in a place where the sun rises before 4am and sets at 7pm. Growing up in Michigan I didn't know how good we had it. Here in Hokkaido we have summer recreational baseball leagues that play full games *before* people go to work. Mountain climbing, I wake at 2 and start at 3am since it is already twilight conditions. Yes it is "your fault" if you don't wake up and... watch the sunrise (?), but considering all the shops are still closed there is not much you can do except work up a sweat in silence before your work day starts. Other than fishermen and farmers who don't punch a clock, daylight for 9-5 types is wasted on fitful sleep. I would rather swing the clock 3 hours ahead and putting the sunlight to use... and this wouldn't mean driving in the dark either.

    3. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by cronius · · Score: 2

      http://www.timeanddate.com/news/time/russia-winter-time.html :

      "I have made a decision to cancel the move back to 'winter' time starting from autumn this year", Russian president Dmitry Medvedev said on Tuesday, February 8, 2011. The new legislation eliminates the yearly switch between standard time and daylight saving time.

      I totally agree, and I love the fact that Russia just "did it". Maybe other European countries won't be so scared if they can follow the lead instead of taking charge themselves so that we can finally end the nonsense.

      Oh and by the way I live in Norway, were DST has a pretty strong effect on the sunlight. Just about every autumn the DST is discussed in the media, because people are so sick and tired of messing up their day rhythm. We don't care about the sunlight, we adapt, but changing the time is brutal on the sleep pattern.

      --
      Life is Reality
    4. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "You probably live on a tropical zone"

      Riiiight. Perhaps you should look up the UK on a map sometime.

      "In central/northern UK the sun rises at 4am during the summer"

      And what? It also sets at after 9pm GMT in the summer. If you start work at 8am you've missed 3 or 4 hours sun but when you finish work at 4pm you've got another 5 hours to go.

    5. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "Clearly you haven't spent a summer living in a place where the sun rises before 4am and sets at 7pm."

      So it rises 8 hours before noon and sets 7 hours after. Give or take 30 mins due to timezone not matching the exact longitude that sounds pretty normal to me. Whats your point?

      "I would rather swing the clock 3 hours ahead and putting the sunlight to use."

      Why not just get up earlier. Its not illegal AFAIK.

    6. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      But they did it backwards. Now it will always be 11:00 at astronomical noon..

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    7. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by leathered · · Score: 1

      I totally agree, and I love the fact that Russia just "did it"..

      Countries that just "do it" are usually unhindered by democracy.

      --
      For all intensive porpoises your a bunch of rediculous loosers
    8. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you yourself said "you've missed 3 or 4 hours sun", it means you understand that the optimal work start time is a fixed amount after sunrise. You originally said "I don't see the point of daylight saving AT ALL", but it's simple: it makes the work start time closer to optimal. I think you see the point now, but you're just being stubborn and won't admit it.

    9. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He already answered that. He said that shops are closed so there's not much you can do. Waking up earlier is worth it if *everyone* does it and store hours are adjusted. This is all neatly achieved by changing the clocks.

    10. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Actually I said get up earlier instead of fucking around with the clocks.

    11. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Who the hell votes for these things - surely not the people, so I don't see your point.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    12. Re:Why stop at 2 hours? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is it gets EVERYONE to change their working hours at the same time. Personally I'd rather have a permanent BST, I absolutely hate it when the clocks go back in the Winter, and if this doesn't suit the Scots, well they can have their own time zone for all I care (they already have their own parliament). I wouldn't really mind it if it was GMT with everyone starting their day an hour earlier, but the thing is it is a lot easier to get everyone to change their clocks than their working hours (even if the effect is the same).

      Why can't I just change my own hours? Well that would be because I have a child that goes to school and I can't change the school's hours to match, and there are lots of interdependencies like this with working hours which stop it being practical for many.

  34. Trying to wake me up one hour earlier ... by janwedekind · · Score: 2

    ... will not make me trust the currency.

  35. Welcome to CET by morpheus42 · · Score: 1

    Welcome to CET

  36. Doesn't give you more daylight by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    You can do whatever you want with your clock, it will not make your day any longer. The length of the day is not affected at all by the setting of your clock.

    1. Re:Doesn't give you more daylight by locofungus · · Score: 2

      But it does give me more USABLE daylight.

      Currently, for five months of the year it's dark when I leave the house in the morning and it's dark when I get home at night.

      There's no time more depressing than end October when the clocks go back. I've spent the previous few weeks going to work in the dark. Now I get to see the sun coming up on my way in (really useful NOT!) and I know I won't see the Sun in the evening until the clocks change again.

      Moving the clocks by an hour will give me a brief interval in the evening where essential jobs can be done (sweeping up leaves, fixing dripping outdoor taps etc), freeing up time at the weekend that is currently wasted on those 15 minute jobs that _can't_ be done during the week.

      Daylight in the evening is far more valuable than daylight in the morning even if your work hours are flexible. If your doing something messy in the garden then you can pack up as the Sun goes down and then shower and change inside when it's dark. Try to do it in the morning and you cannot start until the sun comes up and then you'll shower and change during daylight hours before leaving for work.

      There is an argument that increasing the time difference with the States will affect some interactions. But OTOH, more overlap with the Far East will somewhat compensate for that.

      Scotland can have its own timezone if that's what it wants. Perhaps companies that interact extensively with the States will relocate offices there as a result. It would take a little getting used to, especially for people who commute across the border to work but nothing insurmountable.

      Tim.

      --
      God said, "div D = rho, div B = 0, curl E = -@B/@t, curl H = J + @D/@t," and there was light.
    2. Re:Doesn't give you more daylight by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Daylight in the evening is far more valuable than daylight in the morning even if your work hours are flexible.

      If your work hours are flexible, it doesn't actually matter. Just go to work an hour earlier. Problem solved. We are not in central Europe, we are on the western periphery, therefore it's wrong for us to be on central European time.

  37. Re:Two hours? Boring! Try 2:37 (hours : minutes) by Yaur · · Score: 2

    why stop there? why not get really outside the box and make it fully algorithmic instead of lookup table based.

  38. There is always some device you can't update it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Australian government likes to keep meddling with timezones. There is always some device that you can't update automatically, manually or otherwise... If it isn't a thin client or a PDA of some variety that has no updates available from the manufacturer and no way to manually edit the TZ data it will be some obscure piece of hardware, or you find a Windows 2000 server that you have to manually update the tzdata. At least most of the changes we've had are just wait two weeks, it will fix itself... (till next year). Changing it to 2 hours means waiting 6 months before it rights itself - I mean the user will make you actually fix it by then! Poor bastards in the UK.

  39. A little better for Bangalore by mrthoughtful · · Score: 2

    The families of Indian call centre employees will be happier - it means that their sons and daughters will be one hour less from the rest of India. If the UK were to be so generous to go +5.30 onto Indian time, even better

    --
    This comment was written with the intention to opt out of advertising.
    1. Re:A little better for Bangalore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am surprised a politican has not already suggested the global time-keeping be centered on Bangalore, India or Bombay, India since that is the country with all the "best and brightest."

    2. Re:A little better for Bangalore by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      As a greelance worker in the UK who works different hors when with different employers, I really wish they would just leave the clocks alone. Stop all this "Summer time" stupidness.

      Some people do shift work, some work according to the needs of the cows and fields, and MPs work more stupid hours than anyone else. The problem is not the clocks. There may be a case for permitting Flexible working, but I thought that had been allowed since the 1970s.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:A little better for Bangalore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The families of Indian call centre employees will be happier - it means that their sons and daughters will be one hour less from the rest of India. If the UK were to be so generous to go +5.30 onto Indian time, even better

      I am not sure about this considering the work culture in India. Probably this may result in one more hour more work without pay

  40. CET by exallon · · Score: 0

    This would align the UK with the rest of Europe (CET). I guess that would be good for trading hours etc. Not loosing an hour flying one way to the UK etc. So I guess it would be a good thing during summer. Assuming the most important goal isn't to align with the US which is already kind of hard.

  41. Re:Less prozac needed? by flurdy · · Score: 1

    The current non adjusted BST time makes it unpleasent to leave work at 5pm in the dark for the larger population during the middle of winter.

    An extra hour adjusted would eg change the sunset from 4pm to 5pm in the London area on 1st of January.

    After February or earlier than November would this extra hour mean a more "happy" population with that extra light for their own personal/family time? Would the NHS dispense less Prozac?

    --
    My other Sig is very funny.
  42. Not in England by john.wingfield · · Score: 1

    "United Kingdom" (a country) "England" (a province)

    1. Re: Not in England by john.wingfield · · Score: 1

      "United Kingdom" (a country) "England" (a province)

      Slashdot removed my less than/greater than sign...

      "United Kingdom" (a country) is not equal to "England" (a province)

    2. Re:Not in England by garyok · · Score: 4, Informative

      "United Kingdom" (a country) "England" (a province)

      So very wrong. United Kingdom = state. England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland = countries. Ulster (Northern Ireland + 3 counties in Eire) = province. Great Britain (or just Britain as we're not so big-headed these days) = England + Scotland + Wales + islands (but not Northern Ireland, and definitely not Eire). Nationality of a UK subject - as we're subjects of the Crown rather than citizens of the state - is British.

      Hope this clears up the confusion.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
    3. Re:Not in England by Alioth · · Score: 1

      We are not subjects of the crown, and haven't been for a very long time. There are now very few people who are considered "British subjects"

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_nationality_law

    4. Re:Not in England by gibbsjoh · · Score: 1

      Most of us haven't been British subjects since 1983 when the British Nationality Act (1981) came into force. Even then it was something of an anachronistic term.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_British_nationality_law#British_Nationality_Act_1981

      --
      -- "...I'm a bad guy because I, well, I sing some rock-and-roll songs." M. Manson
    5. Re:Not in England by garyok · · Score: 1
      Okeydoke, I'll take that one on the chin - I was wrong. I was a subject when I was born but now I'm a citizen. Good to know. Doesn't really change anything unless we've stopped living in a constitutional monarchy though. And, from the British subject article

      Although the term "British subject" now has a very restrictive statutory definition in the United Kingdom, and it would therefore be incorrect to describe a British citizen as a British subject, the concept of a "subject" is still recognised by the law, and the terms "the Queen's subjects", "Her Majesty's subjects", etc., continue to be used in British legal discourse.

      --
      One of the penalties for refusing to participate in politics is that you end up being governed by your inferiors - Plato
  43. It's only the South of England that wants it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The North of England, Scotland, bits of Wales and NI would be worse off with this in Winter, as we know from experience

    1. Re:It's only the South of England that wants it by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 1

      I don't want it and I live in the south of England...

      --

      Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  44. Nothing will happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Could this cause another 'millennium Bug' fiasco?

    No. The particular details of daylight savings time (when it starts, when it ends, whether in fact a particular state or territory as it at all) changes frequently in different time zones all across the globe. All operating systems issue timezone database updates to deal with precisely this issue. If your particular operating system is out of support then just change the timezone manually.

  45. Re:Two hours? Boring! Try 2:37 (hours : minutes) by FTWinston · · Score: 1

    I'll go with this change if we get to bring all of America with us onto CET. That makes only slightly less sense than this proposal.

  46. stuff that matters when the poop overflows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/20/us/politics/20data.html?_r=1

    pretty funny, no? 'our 'secrets' will kill us'? looks like the world at large is not thrilled with some of ours.

    time, space & circumstance does seem to be changing more noticeably before us. are hours still relevant? adjustments seem to be much more frequent now. almost nothing else of value can occur until all the sick/scared/hungry babies are cared for. see you there?

    1. Re:stuff that matters when the poop overflows by eyenot · · Score: 1

      http://vimeo.com/5089426

      Are you sure they arent going to find you? And just put bugs in your teeth?

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  47. This will cause computer system problems by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

    I recently worked on a trading system that had 50 columns for the half-hours in a day, to accommodate the long day when the clocks go back. So if this happens, they have 6 months or so to expend it to 52 columns and to make sure all the clock changing logic still works with a two hour change. I thought they were considering year-round daylight savings - maybe we will go forward two hours then back only one, and then stabilize at those UTC offsets, so our clocks then match CET. I bet a lot of Europhobes will be unhappy with that just on principle!

    1. Re:This will cause computer system problems by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Unless this trading system runs on local-time, New York time will log a normal day on the day this 2-hour jump goes into effect and the world will go on as usual. There's been 2 hour jumps in other timezones before, have you ever looked at the long-long-long list of time zone rules Windows has to abide by and Microsoft has to issue a Critical Update for every time some lawmaking body wants to mess with timekeeping.

      This just goes to prove the idea that Windows XP is secure due to being time tested doesn't hold water in all situations. This is one update you have to have, otherwise your system clock will not match the watches of the people around you.

    2. Re:This will cause computer system problems by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      The system only has to consider one time zone, it's all within the UK. The 50-column problem pre-dates my brief involvement in the system so I don't know why they chose not to consider a two-hours-back time change as a possibility.

      Doesn't the "internet time" functionality in Windows also pick up time zone data from the time server?

  48. we have Daylight Savings TIme, and it sucks! by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    every spring we move the clocks forward an hour and every autumn we move the clocks back an hour, personally i wish we would split the difference and then leave the damn clocks alone!

    it does not save anything and you do not get anymore sunlight.

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  49. it sucks _ by ego+centrik · · Score: 1

    _ so the vampires finally figured out, how to suck us dry in sunlight.

  50. Will not work, US tried it already by brunes69 · · Score: 1

    This is the exact same BS reason that the US screwed around daylight savings time, with the misguided idea that it would somehow save energy.

    These kinds of things might have mattered 50 years ago, but they simply do not in today's 24/7 economy. If people want to shop, they will go out and shop, they won't stay home because it is dark outside.... heck they would just shop online anyway.

    The idea that somehow giving an extra our of daylight is going to have any noticeable impact on a national economy is ridiculous.

    1. Re:Will not work, US tried it already by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but when DST was first introduced the main driver of energy use was artificial lighting. In that context DST makes at least some sense, as more usable daylight means less need for artificial light (even though it would make even more sense to just get up earlier and leave the time alone). However, the main driver of electricity use today during the DST interval is not lighting, but air conditioning—and sending people home earlier in the day, when the temperature is higher, increases the demand for less efficient residential air conditioning.

      Recent studies in the U.S. have confirmed that switching to DST not only fails to save energy, but actually increases the demand for electricity when compared to maintaining the same time year-round.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  51. No millenium BUG by NSN+A392-99-964-5927 · · Score: 0

    The only bug you shall face, is politics and idiots against this idea. Including people who do not get up early in the morning and are stressed out.

    I am awake around 04:35 to 07:00 each day. I do hard work before daylight and then relax for the rest of the day as it is MINE. I earned the rest of the day for myself and put in all the "Front End" work. I do not expect some /. mods to even understandand this when they are so far up their own arseholes.

    When will you learn that dedicating your life to hard work... defined as the work you do not want to do. You can stop crying like a baby.Now fuck off and go and whistle on facebook or some other shit social network site.

    --
    All cows eat grass!
  52. fixing the computers is another way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fixing the computers is another way to stimulate the economy

  53. Winter jogging by Max_W · · Score: 1

    People have difficulty to jog in cold weather. So I suggest to make the meter 10 cm shorter for the winter.

    Just some minor adjustments are to be made: separate summer and winter measuring sets, some changes in aircraft software, etc.

  54. vote for!! by DrPatrickBarry · · Score: 1

    I soooo hope they do this, I might even consider voting tory for a millisecond

  55. Now that I have a toddler... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    DST sucks when you have kids.
    "It's time for night night"
    "Why?"
    "It's night time"
    "No it's not" *Points a light still pouring through window*
    "grrrr"

    1. Re:Now that I have a toddler... by qc_dk · · Score: 1

      Living in Scandinavia sucks in winter.
      "3 pm class: Everyone open your books to page 65"
      "But I wanna go night night"
      "It's day time"
      "No it's not" *Points to the darkness pouring through the windows from an overcast sky reminiscent of Mordor*
      "grrr"

    2. Re:Now that I have a toddler... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      And the kids aren't used to the fact that sometimes it gets dark early and other times it gets dark late by that time?

      Are their parents idiots?

    3. Re:Now that I have a toddler... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      DST sucks when you have kids.
      "It's time for night night"
      "Why?"
      "It's night time"
      "No it's not" *Points a light still pouring through window*
      "grrrr"

      Who are you, Ned Flanders?

    4. Re:Now that I have a toddler... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Maybe someone that wants some recreational time in the evening...

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    5. Re:Now that I have a toddler... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then in the fall, you won't get the "extra" hour of sleep the first day, either. Kid will wake up same time.

    6. Re:Now that I have a toddler... by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Do you like rhetorical questions?

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  56. The most interesting thing by khallow · · Score: 1

    Now I find the UK has a "backyard barbarque" lobby too. In the US, such measures were defeated because politicians rightly realized that the ire of hundreds of millions of people having to deal with double the number of time changes would more than outweigh the political support of people who wanted to play for another hour of daylight in the evening.

    Perhaps this move will have a benefit, like hastening the recycling of the current crop of politicians.

  57. supposedly... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    the existing summer time system hurt more then aid economy as there is as much productivity lost in the changeover as is gained with the daylight.

    Tho i suspect that when much more of the light was provided naturally it made sense. But these days we can keep shifts going 24/7 thanks to artificial lighting.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    1. Re:supposedly... by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

      Nah, most of the productivity losses were actually due to the simple effects of messing with everybody's circadian rhythms -- this causes more accidents, as people are (understandably) tired and underslept for the first week or so after the 'lost' hour...and the week after the 'gained' hour is not much better; the fact that it generally results in lots more people heading to work in the dark while underslept just adds to the fun. (Mind you, it certainly does help certain businesses--car repair, hospitals, undertakers...) It never made sense.

  58. The more change the better by superposed · · Score: 2

    The rules for starting and ending U.S. daylight saving time and British Summer Time are both set by legislation and have changed several times. Hard coding them into software is a serious mistake. The only safe way to deal with DST is to maintain a lookup table for the specific dates each year or a list of the years when the rules changed, and update these tables regularly. The more often the rules change, the more incentive people will have to adopt appropriate practice, rather than encrusting their software around the old rules. (Not that the rules should be changed arbitrarily; they just shouldn't be left unchanged for fear of "breaking" something.)

    1. Re:The more change the better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you have not had to deal with all the timezone (TZ) updates around the world that are constantly being reflected in updates for both Windows and Java (amazing how intertwined TZ settings are with Java code - at least based on all the updates I see throughout each year).

      RO

    2. Re:The more change the better by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      When I last built something that needed to cope with time changes, I built a static driver table that held all the changes up to 2099, and I included an Excel spreadsheet that would calculate the contents of the table based on the current rules, and a note on how to amend the spreadsheet formulae to cope with various potential changes to legislation in the future. The client just stared at me like I was speaking in Martian or describing how to survive an invasion by demons and pixies.

      I think the most sensible way to do this change is simply not to put the clocks back in October, and then carry on as usual with +1 next spring and -1 in autumn. The client already had a system in place that would only allow for a maximum of 25 hours in any one day, so this would avoid breaking that limit.

    3. Re:The more change the better by superposed · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, 25 hours in a day. I often work with hourly data from power system operators, and they are completely inconsistent in how they handle daylight saving time. Many only allow for 24 hours per day, and throw out an hour or insert a null when the clocks change (good luck figuring out which hour they threw out!). The better ones have a system which allows up to 25 hours per day. One day has 23, and one has 25, but at least you can tell what's going on. I suppose these will break if the UK switches to a 2-hour leap, or possibly if they switch to two one-hour leaps. Not that Double Summer Time was unforeseeable - it's been done before, even in the UK.

  59. Don't change at all! by defaria · · Score: 1

    Stop moving the fucking clock already! It does nothing 'cept confuse people!

  60. NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can we vote on it please?
    I want a "stop dicking about with the clocks and leave them at UTC all year anyway" option.
    thanks.

  61. GMT is named for something by Brian+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    And that something is the Greenwich meridian, which is in the east of the UK, so most of the country is west of this line.

    Now this change wants to bring us into line with countries that are either mainly east of the meridian or sufficiently far south that they see more winter daylight than we do.

    It's a bad idea, it was tried in WW2 and also from 1968-1971, and it was unpopular and unwanted then.

    Why we're going down this path again I really don't know.

    Sheesh!

    --
    -- BtB
  62. Get rid of summer time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    get rid of time zones.

    GMT everywhere all the time.

    get up when it is light.

    1. Re:Get rid of summer time by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I agree. Just let the businesses say, "We open an hour past sunrise" or put a little clock in their front door pointing to the time when the doors open. It doesn't have to be 8:00/9:00 or some other set hour so everyone has 9-5 working hours. I'd be perfectly fine going to work at 12:00 and leaving at 20:30 with daylight left in the sky.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  63. Forget DST by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's fucking retarded. I've lived with and without it, and guess what I like about my current locale.. it's not a DST timezone.

    The argument of "I want an extra hour with the kids/shopping/surfing/seeking prostitutes" or whatever you would do with an hour is obviously a fallacious slippery slope. If you want one, then why not two or twelve?

    If an extra hour is needed by everyone in the afternoon, how about they learn to schedule their shit? Instead of something as silly as changing your clocks, just fix the underlying issue of shifts at work ending late/school finishing late/etc. FFS, people.. use your brain.

  64. Indiana finally sets a global trend (LOL) by salesgeek · · Score: 1

    We went on daylight savings time a few years ago... and were expecting that it would change our economy from a classic agrarian model to a modern, service driven powerhouse. All that happened was a rise in sales of coffee, energy drinks and replacement alarm clocks. It's good to see you'uns across the pond imitating good old fashioned Hoosier know how. (and yes, the rustics here say "you'uns" instead of "y'all)

    --
    -- $G
  65. Got Milk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cows give more milk during daylight hours...

  66. Re:Two hours? Boring! Try 2:37 (hours : minutes) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're not being visionary. Make the sun rise half an hour before people need to leave the house in the morning, and make it set 16 hours later. Problem solved. If celestial mechanics were paid as much as politicians, we'd have fewer problems.

  67. Could this cause another 'millennium Bug' fiasco? by khakipuce · · Score: 1

    That's how it will stimulate the economy. Loads of consultancies will frighten companies into upgrading their systems to cope with the change. CIO's of said companies have nothing to loose in getting the board to reduce profits for a year or two and invest in IT infrastructure...

    That said it would be a bit easier from a psycological point of view if they just didn't put the clocks back in the autumn, rather than adding 2 hours in spring

    --
    Art is the mathematics of emotion
  68. How do I updated table? by tepples · · Score: 1

    The only safe way to deal with DST is to maintain a lookup table for the specific dates each year or a list of the years when the rules changed, and update these tables regularly.

    What is the best practice to "update these tables regularly" for a device that is not connected to the Internet for security or cost reasons?

    1. Re:How do I updated table? by superposed · · Score: 1

      If the device has no automatic way to receive this information, then you have to allow the user to tell it when DST is in effect, either when it occurs or by updating the list of rules. They'll need to be able to update the time anyway if the device is moved to a new time zone, runs fast or slow, or loses power. This worked just fine for computers "back in the day," and it works fine for the clock on my oven. Daylight Saving Time has pretty far-reaching effects, and it's unrealistic to expect policymakers to lock it down forever, just so a few automated-but-not-networked appliances can keep following the same old rules.

    2. Re:How do I updated table? by TheLink · · Score: 1

      If it's about security and cost reasons then better to forget about it and just use something based on TAI (not UTC which has pesky stuff like leap seconds).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Atomic_Time

      If all your machines worldwide are using TAI, it's actually easier to figure out when an incident happened - since they all are about the same time - at worst you just need to do some small offset corrections - no need to figure out which server is DST and which isn't.

      --
  69. Updates to zoneinfo data without Internet by tepples · · Score: 1

    Hopefully there was a very good reason you couldn't use the public domain zoneinfo data and BSD-licensed library code.

    It might be the case if a device has no way to automatically check for and download updates to the "public domain zoneinfo data". This can happen on a device with no connection to the Internet.

    1. Re:Updates to zoneinfo data without Internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's no reason to reimplement the library or the database, though. If you can't get updates then the only option is for the user to set the time manually.

    2. Re:Updates to zoneinfo data without Internet by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No. If you can determine it algorithmically (as is the case with CET/CEST), then you can simply add the algorithm and give the user the option to switch off the automatic adjustment and do it manually in case the rules change.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  70. I nominate... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I nominate this AC for a position in Government, based on his keen grasp of the benefits of additional DST. Or, at the least, a position in a lobbying firm.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  71. Re:Two hours? Boring! Try 2:37 (hours : minutes) by Rufty · · Score: 4, Funny

    t=t+rand();

    --
    Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
  72. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  73. This is NOT just an OS patch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As many of us IT folks found out last time around, while the OS was just fine after it received it's patches for tzdata, there was one teensy problem:

    JAVA

    It does not play well with others, it uses it's own routines for determining time, and does not use the system, so after checking out the systems, we were all smiles and happy that of course the patches worked. Then the reports started rolling in, the applications were showing and generating the wrong time, as if they knew nothing at all of the tzdata change. So now the mad dash was on to figure what was wrong!

    Production failing, applications crashing, why why why?

    JAVA likes to keep it's own time, which was learned after couple hours of investigation, now the mad dash was on to get the patches from SUN to fix all of this. By the end of the day all was right with the world again, but after a very exhausting 8 hours!

    Now imagine, an application that does not use system calls to maintain time, and requires it's own patches just to maintain TZ tables!

    So, we saved so much time by mucking around with DST, and then spent it all and more FIXING an application issue!

    OT anyone?

  74. I'm not sure about your computer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure they will be fine .. one way or another.

    But from experience .. every time the clock is changed it pisses people off. Not only that .. but it does it for a long time. Long after the week or two it takes your body to adjust to the time change you will still be hearing the same thing from various people .. leave the damn clock alone.

  75. Why Change the clocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Change working hours from 8-5 to 6-3... problem solved.

  76. it's been tried, ya know: by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    They changed the start/end date of DST in the US of A rather recently. Epic fail. Aside from the pain it caused all the computers and hard-programmed wristwatches (you know, those pieces of jewelry people wore before everyone had a cell phone), it did absolutely bupkis for the economy, and not even anything for SaveTheChildren(TM) with respect to daylight at school bus stops.
    Changing DST by any amount, or deleting it, will not help anything and will cause trouble.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  77. indeed, why not 5 years while at it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Think about it: Five years ahead all the economic troubles might have been solved by some magical invention which we can assume have happened in between.

  78. Not a good thing by wwphx · · Score: 1

    Here's what to expect: those who do not patch their servers are going to have time anomalies. Electronic thermostats are not going to recognize the switch, so heating/cooing systems may start up or shut down at odd hours, i.e. not in sync with office/operations hours. Electronic time clocks are also likely to be screwed up. And why do I know this? Because these are problems we encountered in my office when Dubya changed the dates DST changes in the USA to allegedly save energy.

    My advice? DON'T DO IT! There are too many industrial controllers that have pre-programmed DST switchover offsets, and they either can't be or aren't upgraded. I'm not a fan of DST in any way, shape, or form. Of course, I'm originally from a place that does not do DST, so I might be slightly biased.

    (and what the frack is up with this double-spacing? That ain't the way I entered it!)

    --
    When you sympathize with stupidity, you start thinking like an idiot.
  79. I guarantee it by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

    I can guarantee there will be issues. We had this change forced on us for 3 years as a trial in Perth, Western Australia and every single Windows computer / Outlook+Exchange server got screwed up (although only 1 hour). For the entire 3 years. Because every year MS would release a new patch which was not in Windows Update (i.e. you had to hunt it down manually) to fix the date changes and every one of those patches only effected a single year. So come March 1 everyone would suddenly start complaining "my appointments are all 1 hour out!".

    I see no reason to suspect it would be any different in the UK; except perhaps the UK might be a big enough market for Microsoft to try harder.

  80. Learn from the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the US changed the DST two years ago it was a far more costly fix on computers and equipment then Y2K caused. I was working as a contract IT hire for small business and easily billed 500+ hours on it. Not to mention all the devices that will never become compliant like my digital thermostat that probably wastes considerably more oil for the heater because it is off ever DST cycle. Idiots learn from the idiots in the US government for once it didn't work.

  81. why? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    With Britain so close to the Arctic circle the length of daylight in the summer is already quite long so I'm not sure what the purpose of this is.
    If they move sunrise to 7am, this would almost make Britain the land of the midnight sun.

  82. WTF for? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    In a modern world Daylight saving doesn't save anything. If you want to save power for lighting just mandate the end of incandescent bulbs.

    Its also really annoying having the time change in the middle of March when it would affect meal times.

      I have lived in both hemispheres

  83. Whats wrong with DST? by mitler · · Score: 1

    Why do we keep going through all this insanity where clocks have to change twice a year? Is the benefit really worth the hassle? Adding another hour seems like yet another variable to worry about with marginal benefit. I wish we could just stay on daylight saving time all year long so it isn't dark when I leave work in the winter, and my clocks never change.

  84. Closely on the heels of similar news from Russia by eyenot · · Score: 1

    Just a few days ago I read news that Russia had decided to stop changing their clocks entirely, and that they had abolished time zones. Apparently what this meant was that the government had laid claim to the entire commodity of time.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jwXLE1lFaS1LKhimZT5at-QMjZ3Q?docId=CNG.152f8947ca6447e697fff35e7e7d6f49.381

    Quote:
    "Seconds, minutes, hours and other units to measure time are government property and cannot be privatised," Izvestia daily wrote Friday, accompanied by a drawing of a man with a cuckoo leaping out of his head. /quote

    It seems sensible to me. One thing i read said something along the line of, "the cows domt know what time it is". I always agreed, you either live and work by a natural cycle or an artificial one. Naturally, you wake up when day breaks and you stop working when its too dark. Artifically, you work 9 to 5.Â

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  85. How about Western Europe moves back to GMT? by orudge · · Score: 1

    Spain, France, Belgium and the Netherlands should all be on GMT. Personally, I think that would make far more sense than Britain switching to CET. The Greenwich meridian is in the UK, for heaven's sake!

    1. Re:How about Western Europe moves back to GMT? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      "Local mean time" is just as arbitrary. What's wrong with having noon at 11?

      The bad thing with DST isn't that noon isn't at or near 12:00. The bad thing with DST is that there's a one-hour switch twice a year. Otherwise, I couldn't care less if the sun reaches the zenith at 12:00 or at 7:47.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  86. Business hours by Manfre · · Score: 1

    I've always been amazed that businesses don't counter these time shifts by adjusting their business hours to negate the offset.

  87. law of dimwitted returns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look, DST is a net loser for the economy. Rather than the law of diminishing returns, considering 2 hrs is the law of dimwitted returns.

  88. China has one time zone by tepples · · Score: 1

    That almost sounds like what China did. China is about as big as the United States, but the whole country runs on Beijing time.

  89. Software with hard coded DST change values. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The time zone database maintainers wouldn't be too thrilled. They're already not too happy with Lord Howe Island which has a 1/2 hour DST change. I know Oracle 10 is broken for LHI. Time doesn't exist for LHI for about 1/2 hour during DST change. Apparently someone hard coded a 1 hour DST change. Fixed in Oracle 11 supposedly. I use LHI and Canada/Newfoundland for DST testing which is how I know about this.

    The UK should do it and find all the other software out there with hard coded 1 hour DST changes for us.

    1. Re:Software with hard coded DST change values. by Curmudgeonlyoldbloke · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, that's exactly 347 people mildly inconvenienced. Somehow I doubt that Larry Ellison is losing too much sleep.

  90. Why are we isolated into a bunch of bubbles by eyenot · · Score: 1

    So peoplebfind that waking up at six or seven am is normal in the sense "what my great grandparents did is normal".

    But your great grandparents werent globally connected and constantly brought to global relevancy by handheld devices. They didnt have communicators, yet. It was sci fi to them.

    I think DST wad largely like scifi to the American public, as well. But like somebody who purchases the twisty energy savet bulb, they count the energy being "saved": "by the time my grandkid is born, she and everybody else in the country will be benefitting feom increased standard of living reflecting saved hours of light multiplied by productive value of one work hour multiplied by the number of citizens working with population increase ... why, why well all be millionaires, congress is a genius."

    So even if common sense says "fucking with your clock doesnt actually make more daylight happen", if you bury it behind a layer of economic voo doo, that makes it easier to swallow.

    Well, the energy saver bulbs are an environmental hazard disaster, there arent any flying cars, and amazingly wow, the economy is tanked.

    People who are down and out get really sensitive. Its one thing when you're on top of your game and the entire drive to work has you screaming "show me the money" out your car window. But when your hours are cut, an you can only affordnto be sober, you probably begin to discover things like, the extra letters "S" in the weekends dont cast a magical spell that lets you sleep in, and youll tend to wake up around sunrise and get sleepy when it gets dark out. Imagine that.

    So what really happens with timekeeping is that your employer is legitimised in driving you into the ground, on the basis that you agreed that what the clock says is more relevant than nature. The DST scheme only works if everybody has to work banker's hours. If you're a farmer, you probably get up either between 3 and 5 AM, or else around sunrise. If you go to work around noon, the nonsense of DST becomes even more pronounced.

    But bankers would try to squeeze blood from a turnip if they could make money off more blood.

    In the modern world, with our global connectivity and instant global relevance, most of our communications dont take months to arrive. We speak instantly to people halfway around the planet. We talk about "now" and "a few hours ago", "a few hiurs from now".

    What we should all do is stop pretending that layer upon layer of conventionand fix and patch and capitulation and modifixation are actually "doing" anything, and drop the time zone bubbles, and the nausea inducing clock holidays, and just everybody, all workers, all employers, all personnel, and all pets and psychotics, just go onto UTC full time. so wht if that means it's brightest where you are at "five o clock"? Who cares? Its not your own little world, assclown. There arent flying cars and time isnt even fucking REAL!

    Ooh! Ooh! Ooh! It's, it's, it's threeeee THIRTY, baby! Cry, baby! Cry!

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  91. precedent by sribe · · Score: 1

    I imagine it will cause about as much disruption as a year or two ago when the start date was changed in the U.S. Almost none.

  92. United State of Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    England != UK. Can you lot in the United States of Florida PLEASE try to learn this.

    As soon as y'all Limeys learn that there is no "United States of Florida", it's the United State of Texas", dang it!

  93. Oh, and as to how dark I mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The proposals mean that on the shortest day of the year, the sun won't rise in Southern England until 9:13am, and Northern Scotland 10:04am. In contrast, in New York on the shortest day of the year, the sun rises at 7:16am.

  94. Change the workday instead? by LihTox · · Score: 1

    It seems like it would almost be easier to ask businesses to adjust the workday, rather than change the clock: have everyone work from 7-4 or 6-3 instead of 8-5.

    1. Re:Change the workday instead? by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Perhaps easier to ask but more difficult to net results.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  95. problem? by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    apt-get install tzdata (or equivalent for other platforms). Problem solved. Just make sure your cron jobs don't get skipped over if they're important.

  96. Waste of time and resource! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the George Bush time change a few years ago, my old phone was almost useless in a vehicle. Some towers were telling it to sync to this time and the other towers to that time. The phone could not update automatically and required the user to always accept the time changes, if you did not accept the time changes the phone would stay on the acceptance screen and not process anything else. My alarms clocks TVs, VCR, stereos, refrigerator, stove, microwave even the house alarm would not change time correctly any longer because the built in programming only allowed for DST on certain dates. Sure I could manually update them, but now I'm spending a few days finding all of the clocks that are wrong. Time is a silly measure anyways. If it is dark at 0600 (6am) I will turn a light on, if it is light out at 0600 I will not, the same goes for 1800 (6pm for those who do not know). much more energy, effort and money is wasted on changing time at this point, now that time changes are pre-programmed into almost everything. If it is to dark for you at 0600, then sleep in, if it is to dark for you at 1800, go to sleep, It works well for animals in the wild.

    Most cities base their street lights on one of two systems (or a combination of both): photoelectric (when it falls below a certain light level the street light s go on) or timer (at a certain time the lights go on regardless of ambient light levels). In either case, electricity will be wasted still.

  97. Drunk.... by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

    ... While golfing.

  98. 5 hours ruins last-call by midicase · · Score: 2

    5 hours would be daylight again? You mean I would have to look at that last-call score in the daylight? No thanks!

    "See you later honey, catch me again on standard time."

  99. Policy makers are always coming up with some change in local time somewhere in the world. It's an OS patch that happens all the time. Been there done that. The only way to really throw a wrench into things related to date/time any more would be if the calendar was reconfigured or the 24hr/day scheme was abandoned.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  100. Need a lot more than that ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am at +02:00 at the moment, the problem with England is that it is 2 hours and 20 years behind us...

    1. Re:Need a lot more than that ! by tchiwam · · Score: 1

      Changing time is so confusing I forgot to log in.

  101. Ridiculous by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    This would not "give us 2 more hours in the day", it would merely shift what the "time" of these hours is...
    Why not just get up 2 hours earlier? It would achieve the same result... The idea that you have to get up based on something as arbitrary as a clock is ridiculous.
    In fact, people should stagger when they do things so as to decrease traffic at "peak" times...

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  102. No - we've done irregular DST before by Pope+Raymond+Lama · · Score: 1

    Absolutely no fear -
    In Brazil we had lived with more than 10 years of irregualr schedules for D.S.T. (although it was al=ways for one hour, never two) -
    sometimes computer locks would be off by one hour for a week or more -- and the country never experienced any major failure from that. Event today old windows xp installs change the time back and forth D.S.T. in the incorrect dates, again wioth no victims.

    (We have regular dates for the switch since 2008).

    --
    -><- no .sig is good sig.
  103. Get rid of timezones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am EST (-5:00) timezone. Instead of working 09:00-17:00, why not work from 14:00-22:00.
    Then if any government wants to change working/school time, simple declare a different time. No computer change necessary.

  104. More day light by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was achieved in Indiana. Political leaders also said it would bost the economy. It FAILED miserably

  105. give us more daylight time in the day? WTF! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "give us more daylight time in the day"..... how does a bureaucratic decision alter the time in a day? Can the politicians proclamations actually alter the rate at which only the UK revolves around the sun?

           

  106. What is this nonsense about extra daylight?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A day is still 24 hours, the earth has made one full rotation and the UK has received n hours of sunlight. They way people talk about extra hours of sunlight is so aggravating.

    I don't understand why we need BST at all, if you want to be inline with your EU customers then open 1000-1800 rather than 0900-1700.

    If your customers are in the US man your sales teams 1300-2100 or open a US office.

    If you want to see the sun come up get up earlier - why adjust time at all?

  107. Agreed, plus the Spinal Tap reference: by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    - Look at our new DST plan, we will add TWO hours to our clocks during the summer.
    - Oh, I see. And most countries add just one?
    - Exactly.
    - Does that mean you get an extra hour of sunlight?
    - Well, yeah, you see most countries think that it is not that good when it starts to get dark at say 5pm, so they add one hour and there you are, light until 6pm, but then it still gets dark. Nothing you can do, see, at 6pm it will still get dark. What if you wanted to shoot some more hoops for, say another hour, what do you do then?
    - I don't know...
    - Well, what we do is, if you need that extra hour you have it, because we push the clock one extra hour and you've got daylight until 7!
    - So why don't you just leave the clock as it was and go to work one hour earlier, so that you can finish your work and go for hoops an hour earlier? It will get dark at 6, but you would have had your extra hour by starting your day earlier...
    - [pause] WE'll add TWO hours for DST!

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
  108. The Real Purpose of DST by skywire · · Score: 1

    I tell you Winston, that reality is not external. Reality exists in the human mind, and nowhere else. Not in the individual mind, which can make mistakes, and in any case soon perishes: only in the mind of the party, which is collective and immortal. Whatever the party holds to be truth, is truth. It is impossible to see reality except by looking through the eyes of the Party.

    George Orwell, 1984

    --
    Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
  109. Useless bandwidth... by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

    It's only going to...

    root@GPLHost:node6503>_ ~# apt-get dist-upgrade
    Reading package lists... Done
    Building dependency tree
    Reading state information... Done
    Calculating upgrade... Done
    The following packages will be upgraded:
    tzdata
    1 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
    Need to get 76.9MB of archives.
    After this operation, 0.7MB of additional disk space will be used.
    Do you want to continue [Y/n]?

  110. wake up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    this what is happening is crazy! People arent rich!! they must understand that!! Rhodes island - Greece

  111. Drop all timezones! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This marks a perfect opportunity to get rid of timezones all together and move to Swatch Internet Time.

  112. Not as big a deal by DarkOx · · Score: 1

    Y2k was different in that it was very possible the software simply did not understand years >1999. In this case even if you can't get your code fixed/tzData updated or whatever worst case you have an admin on hand to advance the clock an extra hour and restart services.

    Yes it might be an interuption and might even mean a little down time but I really can't think of more then a few situations where manually advancing the clock won't fix the problem.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  113. More Elegant Solution by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1
    Drop daylight saving/summer time entirely. Possibly even pass legislation to discourage reinstatement--perhaps require some sort of sufficiently embarrassing and arduous task (several hours straight public naked Funky Chicken dance? perhaps with ceremonial body paint?) which must be performed in public by the politician in order to introduce the legislation?

    And of course the politician must be certain that, come the next election, footage shall get run, possibly under a humorous tune.

  114. Spirit Law by Grindalf · · Score: 0

    It violates the spirit law to change a countries clock system so that it subsequently gives a false location of the sun in the sky. Grindalf

    --
    The purpose of existence is to make money.
  115. Re:Two hours? Boring! Try 2:37 (hours : minutes) by Cinnamon+Beige · · Score: 1

    Why be nice? Make it so the random number comes from one of a set of random number servers, depending on the day of the week, the phase of the moon, and how long it's been since some little kids' cricket team in an obscure town in Australia won a game? (Just to add an element of chance to the whole question.)

  116. Re:Is going to happen ha ha ha Ginger Northerner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Personally I'm sick of your miserable tin-pot socialist paradise dragging the rest of us down to your lowest common denominator life of slavery. I would like to finish work and have an extra couple of months to get outside in daylight and do things. What is stopping you wasters in Scotland from operating your own time zone? Get off of my back and put your own house in order. If you want to do things differently from Westminster then get on and do it instead of wailing all the time that someone else is telling you what to do like teenage girls. Now that we have used up all of your oil I don't give a toss what you scroungers do, I'm tired of my taxes being wasted on you. You have your own parliament so get on and devolve the damn thing and take your independence so I can stop subsidising you alcoholic deep fried Mars bar eating drug addicts. I want to walk, cycle, garden, barbecue, whatever outside, not get pissed the moment I get out of work. No wonder you people have the worst health in the whole universe.

    Actually I don't mean any of that mean stuff particularly, but its a good laugh continuing the cliché that the English and the Scots hate each other, you can keep your filthy water and power, I'd rather buy it from an Arab dictator.. I do think that it would be possible to have multiple time zones in the same country. After all we currently work in a time zone that is different to the rest of Europe and it seems to work fine. Its dark in the north of Scotland all bloody day long anyway- I should know I worked in Stockholm for a couple of yours and its at the same latitude so it doesn't matter a hoot what time zone you use. It would seriously improve my quality of life if I had more daylight in the evening here in the far south west, so I am really hoping that they give it a try.And if as you say the presence or absence of daylight doesn't matter to you whilst in a Bar getting pissed-up then you really wont notice the difference anyway.

    I know that most people who live in cities don't care what time of day it is when the light is supplemented by the sun, so this change will be a dismal failure because it doesn't involve a talentless television soap character or a pubescent rap star and their aspirations to rip off the little people and achieve great wealth and offspring.for no effort. So the main value in the experiment is that I approve of the idea and it will irritate everybody else. I'm looking forward to it with great anticipation!

  117. aligning with the rest of Europe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something to take into account is that currently the UK is one hour behind (most of) the rest of Western Europe.
    I think the proposal has the objective to align the UK with the rest of Europe and this is supposed to help doing business with the neighbour countries and ultimately the economy.

  118. What y2k fiasco? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What y2k fiasco? are you referring to that over-inflated cock and bull story sold to millions by the IT industry so that software engineers could amass a small fortune?

  119. NZ changed timezone dates last year by nzNick · · Score: 1

    NZ changed the dates for it 'summer' last year - it was published a year out - all major distros and time servers had had the new dates loaded and it was mostly seamless.

    MS even put out an update to update the timezone file on Windows ....

    The only people that had any problems where those that where running old system (read big Unix/ mainframe system that never miss a beat - but do not accept updates either, due to being isolated from the outside world - they needed the timezone file to be manually updated) , or had not applied the updates.
    Mostly - moving the date by 2 weeks at each end of 'summer' was a none event - but it meant I was able to get home and have beer on the deck in the afternoon sum :-)

    Cheers

  120. well done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha. Australia seems to change is day light saving every other week. Its not a big problem, just a bunch of your servers stop working because there is a greater-than-5-minute difference in their clocks, they won't resynchronize because only half the computers have the updated change-over date installed basically wasting a few hours of business. So, while everyone hopes it will stimulate the economy its likely to waste employers money while IT works out the influx of bugs.

    Well, thats how Microsoft helps Australian business when the Gov wants to alter the change-over. Maybe they care more for the UK?

  121. UK to change BST to be 2 hours off of UTC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will cause turmoil among the sailors in the UK. They are used to converting UTC to BST by adding an hour before doing their navigation. Now they will always wonder if they added one hour or two.

  122. Western Australia did this by bsercombe72 · · Score: 1

    We trialled daylight savings for a year or two and ultimately voted against it. Result: crap patches from Microsoft and every calendar and blackberry going out of whack at least twice. Be prepared for all your scheduled appointments to be incorrect for a while- or worse, duplicated! Don't do it- the extra daylight will fade the curtains faster. As others have suggested- simply changing the workday makes a lot more sense... except if you've got a public transport system to run...

  123. Not going to happen by peetm · · Score: 1

    It's academic - any decision to change the clocks in the UK has to include a buy-in from the devolved Welsh and Scottish assemblies - both have a veto, and the Scottish will use theirs!

    It seems that we have this particular Chestnut come up every year, and every year it's the same - it isn't going to happen (sadly!)

    --
    @peetm
  124. Greed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The origin of this is greed and urbanite mentality. We country cousins just get up earlier in the morning. Citified people need to learn to develop a bit of personal motivation skills and just do it. None of this wanking with the clock.

  125. Biorhythm Rant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fucktards! Leave nature alone!! Quit trying to turn us into autonomous sheltered clock watching drones; this hive mentality obsession of finding a way to increase national productivity a percentage point at the expense of our health ... sucks.

  126. Summary says it all, really by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    In England it has been proposed

    to British Summer Time?

    People who live in one country are trying to dictate what happens in another country, to the likely detriment of that other country.

    This would be an absolute gift to the Nats. Both the Scots Nats and the Welsh Nats.

    For the more proximal issue of what would happen to computers if there was a move like this ... most people would probably have to manually put in a bodge during the several years proposed trials and relate it to "Greenwich Mean Time" (by then utterly notional, as it wouldn't be the time in Greenwich, ever). While I don't know the ins and outs of NTP, I would anticipate that there is configuration file somewhere that defines the meanings of various abbreviations (GMT, BST, CET ... etc) means in terms of offset from UTC, and whether a daylight saving time is implemented, and by how much, and what dates it applies to etc, etc, etc. So people who keep their NTP implementations up to date won't have any real problem, and people who don't keep their implementations up to date will have problems. There would quite likely be an update to the ISO-3166 (IIRC) list of country names at the same time, with Scotland fairly likely to secede from Great Britain, and the United Kingdom to cease to exist. So people would need to get used to using .gb and .sco domains, etc. All in all, the clocks changing would be one of the smaller issues.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  127. Berlin Time by formfeed · · Score: 1

    True, but haven't you considered the value of being in the same time zone as our government? [...] The real benefit is that at long last we will be sharing Berlin Time with the rest of Europe.

    CET is Berlin time?

    Ah right, the favorite past time of the British Islanders: One can kill anything by simply claiming it is a German take-over.

    You forgot, that going to CET was never a sign of German take over but simply a prerequisite.

  128. not a problem by georgesdev · · Score: 1

    timezones change all the time, your pc should get updates of the timezone database.
    your alarm clock or other such products may get problems with a new timezone, but you just modify it manually and that's it.
    The important systems such as banking servers definitely already have the mechanism to adapt to new timezone logics.