Slashdot Mirror


George RR Martin Finishes A Dance With Dragons

Lil'wombat writes "George RR Martin has completed his long awaited conclusion to the A Song of Ice and Fire series. A Dance with Dragons will be published on July 12, 2011. Let the celebrations begin! And everyone was worried that he was going to pull a Jordan."

279 comments

  1. Not the end... by Maximalist · · Score: 2

    I don't believe that this is the end... More books in the series are anticipated.

    1. Re:Not the end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are projected to be two more books in the series. Who's running the pool on how many years it will take to release the next book?

    2. Re:Not the end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, there should be 7 books total. Also, this release if his newest book will correspond nicely with the ending of the first season of the HBO show based on this series.

    3. Re:Not the end... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      which probably isn't an accident.

    4. Re:Not the end... by J.J.+Dane · · Score: 1

      Who's running the pool on how many of the remaining main characters avoid a grisly end?

    5. Re:Not the end... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      martin will die of a infarction long before these books will be done.

      As for next book, barring death, I say 7.5 years.

    6. Re:Not the end... by Cirak · · Score: 2

      Not only is this not the end, but the GRRM post linked in the summary indicates that the book isn't even completed, yet. So, it looks like the summary was wrong on pretty much all counts.

    7. Re:Not the end... by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 1

      I would say not many years... This was obviously a writers block of some sort, and once past that the speed of publication should be fast enough.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    8. Re:Not the end... by riT-k0MA · · Score: 1

      It wasn't writers block so much as he screwed up the timeline with his previous book and was having a huge problem getting the right characters to the right places plausibly.

  2. This is not the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dance with Dragons is the 4th of 7 planned books. It is not the conclusion to the series.

    1. Re:This is not the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its the fifth

    2. Re:This is not the end by travellersside · · Score: 2

      It's the second half of the fourth. Apparently the fourth book was getting so long that he separated out roughly half of the plotlines and set them aside for another volume, which is why a lot of characters don't show up in the fourth. Since he was originally planning on 7 books, this may push it to 8 or even more volumes for the series.

  3. Pulling a Jordan by Darthwickett · · Score: 0

    Too soon?

    1. Re:Pulling a Jordan by ryzvonusef · · Score: 2

      Nah, with all due respect to the author of my favourite series, he was slow. Though it had more to do with his fascination to delving way too deep into often unnecessary details rather than him unable to write a plot in a first place. (For instance, did he really need to spend all that all that screen time on Galina?). That meant that he ended up wasting too much time summing it up.

      Brandon Sanderson really did cut out the "no-doubt-interesting-but-ultimately-irrelevant" plot trivia. That's why he was able to bang out two books in about as many years. Him and Jim Butcher are some of my favorite modern day authors. I highly recommend their works.

      Though if you like, you an replace "Pulling a Jordan" with Author Existence Failure, but that will entail you loosing all track of time :P

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    2. Re:Pulling a Jordan by anyGould · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nah, with all due respect to the author of my favourite series, he was slow. Though it had more to do with his fascination to delving way too deep into often unnecessary details rather than him unable to write a plot in a first place. (For instance, did he really need to spend all that all that screen time on Galina?). That meant that he ended up wasting too much time summing it up.

      Brandon Sanderson really did cut out the "no-doubt-interesting-but-ultimately-irrelevant" plot trivia. That's why he was able to bang out two books in about as many years. Him and Jim Butcher are some of my favorite modern day authors. I highly recommend their works.

      Though if you like, you an replace "Pulling a Jordan" with Author Existence Failure, but that will entail you loosing all track of time :P

      Disclaimer: I am a fan of the Jordan books, although I don't think I could explain the plot to you.

      Which is my Preferred Theory on what happened to Jordan: I don't believe he had the whole thing plotted out, and ended up in Twin Peaks land - so many plot points to clear up that it just couldn't be done, and he couldn't decide which ones to abandon. (I think Sanderson has done a great job just focusing on the important ones, while keeping the general style.) But if I had to compare Wheel of Time to another series, it would be like taking all the Dragonlance novels and running them as one continuous series instead of breaking them up into particular three-four book plots.

    3. Re:Pulling a Jordan by anyGould · · Score: 1

      Also just followed the link, and the post doesn't say the book is done. In fact, it specifically says it's *not* done. All he's done is give himself a public deadline (probably so he *gets* it done by then.)

    4. Re:Pulling a Jordan by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Heh, well, I'd guess the first step in avoiding "pulling a Jordan" is trying not to. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    5. Re:Pulling a Jordan by camperdave · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Apparently "Pulling a Jordan" means to go down with what looks like a career ending injury, only to come back and have the best game of his life.

      Why wouldn't you want him to pull a Jordan?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Pulling a Jordan by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 3

      Personally, I like the Jordan style much, much better for WoT. There's an essential life to the story, and characters, that's missing. A lot of the things that seem unnecessary, even in retrospect, are there to justify the otherwise insane decisions the characters make; for me, it was clearest at the beginning of the Galad/Perrin confrontation--the characters just seem to move on strings, acting for no real reason other than that's what's necessary to move the plot along. I don't mean that to discourage anyone from reading the Sanderson WoT books though--especially since there is a lot in there where, either Jordan wrote it himself, or Sanderson's ability to imitate his style waxes and wanes, because the magic is there, just in spurts. The example I spoke of was probably the worst, and it wasn't that bad.

      Anyway, even (or maybe especially) if you don't lie WoT at all, you should check out Sanderson's other works. Mistborn was pretty good--that's a high compliment for fantasy, which is usually absolute shit--and The Way of Kings, the only published book from the Stormlight Archives, is fucking amazing. I honestly haven't loved a book this much since The Fires of Heaven (I liked WoT before that, but that's the book that made me love it).

      As for what the article is actually about, for those who have read it, is there an actual story arc going on? I read I think around halfway through the first book, and it just seemed like a bunch of disconnected subplots, and keeping track of all the characters even in that little bit was extremely difficult--now that I know he takes his PoV characters seriously it'd probably be easier, but I remember it being a real challenge to even remember what I already read about them. And maybe it's trite of me as a reader, but if I'm going to read about swords and magic and all that, I'm looking for a story about something more than the machinations of a bunch of people squabbling over power. From what I read, it seemed that that's all there would be.

      But, I loved the writing. I loved the characters, and how well the author got into their heads. I guess I'd like to be on the bandwagon for this one, so (please) without spoiling anything, is there an actual story here?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    7. Re:Pulling a Jordan by CFTM · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Just to provide a bit more insight on what Martin is attempting to accomplish in this saga; he's actually a historian by education who specialized in the war of the roses. All the squabbling that occurs is a remythologization of that power struggle, because people generally don't want to read stale history books (and by people, I mean the fiction consuming public). So it's pretty integral to his goals a writer and continues throughout the whole series, but the POV chapters lend very well to get in to the minds of various people and villains often end up having shades of gray which adds a great dynamic IMO. Don't know that any of this changes your opinion on his work though :)

    8. Re:Pulling a Jordan by CFTM · · Score: 1

      Sorry to double reply, but the story is slow moving in many respects ... by the fourth book the overarching phenomenon is still developing and you have an idea of what it will be but still no clear picture.

    9. Re:Pulling a Jordan by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      Robert, not Michael.

      I think it refers to dying with your epic fantasy series unfinished.

    10. Re:Pulling a Jordan by MrZilla · · Score: 1

      I have to second on Jim Butcher. Picked up the first book after Christmas on a recommendation, and less than two months later I had read all 13 or so books in the Dresden series. And for me that's quite a lot more reading than I usually do.

      --
      mov ax, 4c00h
      int 21h
  4. Hey chuckles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still two more books left.

    A Jordan/Bus incident is still VERY possible.

    And while the man might be a brilliant writer have you seen his girth? Heart attack is an option too.

  5. Not a conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Dance with Dragons is not a conclusion - it's book 5 in a series that is currently expected to run at least 7 books. But then considering that this started out as a trilogy, the final book count is not exactly set in stone.

  6. Not the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Uhm, there's one more book, not a conclusion.

  7. Definitive proof the world will end in 2012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First Duke Nukem Forever and now this.

  8. EXCELLENT !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love this, to be able to dance with the dragon. We need more of this, to be able to dance with the dragon. Dance with dragon, available now so buy, Buy, BUY !! Dance with dragon.

  9. He really had that second half written alright.. by turtledawn · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'll echo someone I read a couple of days ago and say this is the longest wait for half of a book I've ever encountered.

    --
    Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  10. two corrections by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) The link says specifically that the book isn't done but it's close enough to done to give it a publication date

    2) It's not the series conclusion. It's the 5th of 7 planned books that was originally supposed to be 3 books total :)

    1. Re:two corrections by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      It was planned to be 3? I got the impression it was planned to be a 7 book series from the beginning. Happens to sync up nicely with the repeated patterns of 7 in the books (the most obvious being the gods of the primary religion described in the books). If it was ever planned to be 3, he abandoned that quite quickly.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    2. Re:two corrections by Drathos · · Score: 1

      IIRC, it was originally supposed to be a trilogy, but he changed that to 6 either during or shortly after writing A Game of Thrones. Then, while writing A Feast For Crows, he decided he had too much to cover in that book, so he split it into 2 and this is the second half of that.

      --
      End of line..
  11. Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by spun · · Score: 0

    I believe it is obvious that Mr. Martin actually had an overall story arc in mind when he first set pen to page in this series. It does not read as though he is just making it up as he goes along, copying and pasting previous story segments while slightly changing the names and circumstances as a shortcut. NO, I do not believe that Mr. Martin had any intention of creating an interminable, never ending cash cow, and then kicking the bucket before penning a finale he never really intended to write.

    Was anyone actually worried he would "pull a Jordan?"

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    1. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by ShawnDoc · · Score: 1

      Yes, and we still are. There are still at least 2 more books in the series that need to be written.

    2. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by RapmasterT · · Score: 2

      Was anyone actually worried he would "pull a Jordan?"

      Yes. He's going to be well into his 70's before he's done, and he weighs like 400lbs.

    3. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a happy coincidence. I was going to throw out an "is this series any good?" question to the /. hordes, but, let's be honest, that would probably tell me nothing. But from other of your posts, I think you can give me a good opinion on that.

      I'm not generally a fan of fantasy (notable exceptions: Nevèrÿon, selected Michael Moorcock, Chronicles of Thomas Covenant (although that was a _long_ time ago)), but I've liked Martin's SF short stories. Is this series worth the time investment?

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    4. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      It's obvious that he had an overall story arc, but his stories move so slowly that it could have easily taken many, many books to complete. He covers a number of years in four books that other authors might cover in four chapters. Of course, now he's running out of Starks and things are coming to a head, but I have a feeling that if this is the actual conclusion to all the story arcs, it will seem really rushed.

    5. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by satuon · · Score: 1

      It does not read as though he is just making it up as he goes along, copying and pasting previous story segments while slightly changing the names and circumstances as a shortcut.

      Are you sure you don't mean Mr. Goodkind here? Because this sounds like a lot better description of him.

    6. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Tynin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Was anyone actually worried he would "pull a Jordan?"

      Yeah, their is concern... check out this timeline:

      * A Game of Thrones (1996)
      * A Clash of Kings (1998) 2 years
      * A Storm of Swords (2000) 2 years
      * A Feast for Crows (2005) 5 years and next book half done
      * A Dance with Dragons (not in 2011) 6 years
      * The Winds of Winter (forthcoming) so 6 years (GRRM age now 68+)
      * A Dream of Spring (forthcoming) so 6 years (GRRM 75+)

      Unless something really changes in the speed of his writing we are likely never going to read the ending.

    7. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Wizard's First Rule was excellent. The second, meh. Third and on, save the trees man, I'd rather have them than this potboilery shit.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    8. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Bleh... I accidentally said (not in 2011) for A Dance with Dragons, didn't mean to say not in... still, the rest of the timeline is correct and saddening. George R R Martin needs to take some notes from Elizabeth Moon. Book 2 of the new series already came out, book 3 is done and at the editor. Book 4 has been started. And still no Song of Ice and Fire. He really should have finished it in October of last year so it could hit stands the same time and the TV series starts in April. So much for that. The new Deeds of Paks series is really good so far. Elizabeth Moons writing has improved 10 fold since she last visited the series. And it went from a 3 book series to 5 books I think at this point. The woman is a machine... story gets into her head and she cannot stop writing.

      LEARN FROM HER GRRM!

    9. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by aslagle · · Score: 2

      This is one of the best fantasy series I've ever read.

      Actually, it's more what I'd call "realistic" fantasy. Now, before you start telling me that fantasy is by definition not realistic, let me explain.

      Martin's characters are some of the most relentlessly human I've seen in a fantasy series. None of the characters, save a few who live on the edges (so far) have been pure good or pure evil. Everybody is a shade of gray.

      Add to that the fact that Martin isn't afraid to kill off major characters, and it's a delight to read.

    10. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      i foresee a new career path for sanderson. help may be needed for janny wurts if she doesn't hurry up, and didn't eddings leave something half done at the end? feist's stuff can probably be kept going forever.

      has sanderson done any sci-fi? he should talk to david gerrold, or gordy dickson's heirs....

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    11. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by slyrat · · Score: 1

      Well, this is a happy coincidence. I was going to throw out an "is this series any good?" question to the /. hordes, but, let's be honest, that would probably tell me nothing. But from other of your posts, I think you can give me a good opinion on that.

      I'm not generally a fan of fantasy (notable exceptions: Nevèrÿon, selected Michael Moorcock, Chronicles of Thomas Covenant (although that was a _long_ time ago)), but I've liked Martin's SF short stories. Is this series worth the time investment?

      It very much is. If you want you could wait for the tv show on HBO to air (April I believe) to see if you like it. The politics, story, characters, and setting are all very good and well worth reading.

    12. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by aslagle · · Score: 2

      Actually, part of what made this book so long in coming was the fact that GRRM initially wanted the 4th book to skip ahead years, with some of the intervening detail revealed in flashbacks. He got partway into writing it, and realized that wouldn't work.

      So, he started over. Then he realized that this new approach required him to fill out all sorts of stuff that he hadn't counted on, which made the book length explode. Then he seperated them into two, and "A Feast for Crows" was born.

      He has stated many times that he wrote himself into a corner (my words, not his), referring to the issue as a "Meerenese Knot". It appears he's finally resolved this, and now is comfortable setting a hard date to be finished with the manuscript.

    13. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by spun · · Score: 1

      Well put, those are exactly the characteristics that I find most enjoyable about Martin's writing.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    14. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by spun · · Score: 1

      Well, I do get suckered into reading some really terrible authors, but thankfully I have managed to avoid Goodkind. As for Jordan, just answer me this, how many times can a woman smooth the front of her dress?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    15. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Personally, I gave up on the series after the second book in which he killed off (mostly at the hands of characters that were unlikable) all of the likable characters from the first book (those that had not died in the first book).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    16. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by tbannist · · Score: 2

      To be fair, Martin was struck by a very bad case of writers block because of the way he wrote A Feast for Crows. He was trying to cut down on the number of characters in the book so he left a bunch of important characters out, but was left with the problem of writing the second book with events that characters in the first one had already experienced. Hopefully he won't have the same issue with the final two books. So there's hope that they'll both get published this decade.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    17. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to that the fact that Martin isn't afraid to kill off major characters, and it's a delight to read.

      Yeah, you never really get that 'safety net' of knowing that your favorite character will survive. It is a hard lesson.

      I also haven't noticed any pure good characters, (Ned being the closest) and the only pure evil characters have been of that 'stuff' coming from the north.

      Some characters that you hate early you will love later, (haven't really seen the converse) and the closest to 'evil' most get is greedy and power-hungry.

      It truly is some of the best writing I have seen and I do appreciate that he is taking the time to write it well rather than quickly, but I am concerned about him kicking it before its done.

    18. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Also, it seems very much to be more a story of political, interpersonal, and family relations that happens to be set in medieval fantasy than it is about fantasy with some personal drama on the side. I've only read 80% of one of the books, but it was very good. (:

    19. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Cinder6 · · Score: 2

      I think it's important to note that the series isn't really a fantasy series. It has fantasy elements, but that is not the focus. Thematically, I would have to say it's tragedy. I wish I'd known that when I went into the series. It's good, but if you expect the good guys to win the day...

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    20. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by spun · · Score: 2

      Yeah, as my wife would say, his books are character driven, not plot driven. The plot exists as a setting in which to explore the characters' motivations and choices, rather than the characters existing merely to move the plot forward.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    21. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Wolvenhaven · · Score: 1

      The new Deeds of Paks series is really good so far. Elizabeth Moons writing has improved 10 fold since she last visited the series. And it went from a 3 book series to 5 books I think at this point. The woman is a machine... story gets into her head and she cannot stop writing. Thanks, I had read the original 3 but had no idea she had written more. Off to the bookstore I go(and here I'm trying to save money this month).

      --
      Orwell was an optimist.
    22. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Nimrodel · · Score: 1

      I genuinely believe that the next two books will happen a lot faster than the previous two did. From what I understand, the long delays on AFFC and ADWD occurred because of restructuring/rewriting. This restructuring occurred because Martin had originally intended to have them take place after a 5-year gap (in-book time), but realized after partially writing it that this necessitated too many flashbacks and wasn't working, and changed it so that the events in AFFC and ADWD take place immediately after A Storm of Swords. I think Martin will probably have gotten most of the parts of the books that the timeline change affected out of the way with ADWD. Also, he has a few chapters banked for the next book already. Besides, he'll have to write faster so the new HBO series based on his books doesn't catch up with him.

    23. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 1

      For my own limited opinion, I read the first two books and had to stop. The writing is incredibly well done, and I agree with other posters comments regarding characterization. However, the story was so damn dark and depressing. At the end of each chapter, something bad happens to one of the main family characters, who are essentially decent people. Every chapter. As I was reading, at the end of each chapter, I was like, "Oh man, that sucks." "Oh, god, that's terrible." "Holy crap!" "That's horrible!" "These poor people!"

      I just couldn't take it anymore, it was so depressing, I had to stop reading the series.

    24. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 1

      I can understand your point of view to a certain extent, but I still hold book 6 (Faith of the Fallen), as one of the best books I've read. I actually enjoyed the whole series (though books 2, 5, and 7 were crap installments).

    25. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by satuon · · Score: 1

      I agree with you on that, some of his dialog and descriptions tend to be repetitive and overly detailed. But I was talking about the 'overall story arc'. His books do have one. It might be slow, it might be protracted, but it is there. Books 8 though 11 books were about Perrin saving his woman, Elayne taking the throne, Egwene taking Tar Valon, and Mat marrying the Seanchan heiress. That's the story arc. It's just that 1 book worth of story was relativistically stretched into 4 books :)

    26. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by bhagwad · · Score: 2

      I didn't like the Ice/Fire series. It barely classifies as fantasy in the first place. After so many books, there's just a mere hint of supernatural elements. Most of it is like some fictional European history. And though there are quite a few interesting characters in the book, I'm getting tired of them just missing each other and never fucking meeting up....Martin has a real problem with tying up storylines.

      Too much fluff. Have you seen the way Isaac Asimov writes? Now that's the way to get a book going! No long boring descriptions of the damned landscape for example.

    27. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jim Butcher
      For a while he was putting out a Dresden File book, a Codex Alera book and a smaller project EVERY YEAR

      Brandon Sanderson (Guy finishing Wheel of Time)
      He's writing WoT. 3 books at 250,000 words each. 1 a year PLUS he manages to come out with OC too. Way of Kings was at least as big as any WoT book and he did that in the middle of the WoT books.

    28. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      I also haven't noticed any pure good characters, (Ned being the closest) and the only pure evil characters have been of that 'stuff' coming from the north.

      Not even Gregor Clegane or the Bloody Mummers?

    29. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      I kind of think this "pulling a jordan" comment is pretty rude, and I'd expect it from a troll thread. Jordan died, most likely against his better judgement. I expect Martin shares our concerns about his potential expiry in the next decade, and also hopes that he doesn't die.

      I understand the impatience, I love the series too, but I think this "pulling a jordan" mentality is hurting everyone. All 4 books have been great, I'd be more afraid that the next book will be a let-down than that the next book won't appear. Trainwrecking the series would be a worse fate than not seeing another entry.

    30. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Faith of the Fallen? Ugh.

      I'm half shocked Goodkind didn't get sued for essentially taking a copy of Ayn Rand's The Fountainhead, crossing out its title and author and writing his own.

    31. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i foresee a new career path for sanderson. help may be needed for janny wurts if she doesn't hurry up, and didn't eddings leave something half done at the end? feist's stuff can probably be kept going forever.

      has sanderson done any sci-fi? he should talk to david gerrold, or gordy dickson's heirs....

      Please no. I like Sanderson's own work, and am miffed that he doesn't have time to write any of his own since he has to finish up Jordan's.

    32. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by imbaczek · · Score: 1

      honestly, there aren't many good guys in the series... and there aren't many purely bad guys, either. mostly it's just people working towards their best interest using more or less shady means.

    33. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by WalksOnDirt · · Score: 1

      I've liked Martin's SF short stories. Is this series worth the time investment?

      I liked his science fiction too, but I dropped this after the first volume. Too much death and maiming for my tastes.

      --
      a,e,i,o,u and sometimes w and y (at be if of up cwm by)
    34. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I think it's pretty clear that, in the beginning at least, the Starks are better people than the Lannisters.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    35. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 1

      Phht. It's Hardly The Fountainhead. Please. Despite the shared elements a common story archetype of one man fighting against popular thought (and architecture I guess? There's a statue in Faith of the Fallen), it has nothing in common.

    36. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Achra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mod parent up. Seriously, he'll be lucky if he finishes this before he reaches his 80's. If he spent the same effort actually writing the Song of Ice & Fire books that he puts into writing his blog everyday, the thing would be done already. These books are the best fantasy-fiction I have ever read (although a bit dark), but these books are super low on the author's priority list.. He even went so far as to tear into his fans on his blog, saying he doesn't owe us anything... I think we'll be LUCKY if he pulls a Jordan (that is to say, leaves enough outline and material for a follow-on author to finish the story after he dies)... I think it is FAR more likely that this will be the last book that we see in the series, leaving this really amazing series stranded.

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    37. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did a short sci-fi story that's available free on the Tor website. http://www.tor.com/stories/2008/12/firstborn

    38. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      It barely classifies as fantasy in the first place. After so many books, there's just a mere hint of supernatural elements. Most of it is like some fictional European history.

      To each his own. To me what you said is a selling point.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    39. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by eddy+the+lip · · Score: 1

      I'm sold. Yours and other comments below make it sound pleasingly non-stereotypical. And depressing. Perfect. It's been a lot of years since I've read any fantasy, so this is kinda exciting.

      --

      This is the voice of World Control. I bring you Peace.

    40. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by bhagwad · · Score: 1

      Except that it's incorrectly marketed as a fantasy.

    41. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ... you don't think it's clear that, at that point in writing the series, Goodkind read him some Ayn Rand and thought it was the most genius shit ever?

      I mean, Jagang is instantly transformed from being a badass conquerer who wants to break your spirit and take everything from you just because he's such a badass and can to... a guy who wants to bring communism to the world. That completely pisses on the characterization of the major antagonist of the series. Faith of the Fallen isn't just a bad, unoriginal book, it's in that "Highlander 2" special echelon of being a sequel so bad, it actually ruins the good entries in the series before it.

    42. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by osgeek · · Score: 1

      Ouch. I guess I missed the news that Eddings had died.

      I have great memories in high school when I happened upon Pawn of Prophecy. It's the first series that I ever took the time to read twice.

      I read Sanderson's Elantris. Not great, but it kept my interest.

    43. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      I don't know if I would agree with that.

      The prologue of the first book has a man being slain and then rising from the dead as a sort of zombie.
      Dany immolates herself and emerges unharmed and with three dragons.
      Thoros is able to repeatedly bring Dondarrion back to life.
      Melisandre demonstrates a number of different magical abilities (immunity to poison and cold, creation of the shadow that kills Renly, etc).
      Jaqen completely changes his face and appearance while Arya watches.
      There are prophecies that are later realized all over the place.

      Those are all fantasy elements. That the characters don't use magic to fly around all over the place or for more casual things like lighting their way in the dark IMHO makes the times when usage occurs more significant to me.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    44. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by osgeek · · Score: 2

      I'm not understanding the summary for this story in the context of what you've written. Why does it say that he has "completed his long awaited conclusion" to the series when there are still two more novels after it to be written and released. Poking around, I read that he may have written a few chapters in later books... but is that it?

    45. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Cirak · · Score: 1

      According to Mr. Martin's blog, one of the reasons why this book has taken so long to complete is because he's had to make complete structural changes to the way he intends to tell this story. He intended to have a substantial break of 10 years of plot time between books, and reference flashbacks in latter books to try and indicate what had happened in those 10 years of unwritten material. He scrapped that plan. Also, anybody who follows Mr. Martin's writings and musings on a regular basis are surely familiar with his frequent references to the "Meereeese Knot", which is a substantial plot point that he's been wrestling with for over 6 years. I'm scared that he's wrestling with a story that has grown out of his control, just like Robert Jordan did. I think that the tagline "Pull a Jordan" is insulting and offensive, but Mr. Martin has not always been in the best of health recently, so I think we have a right to be concerned.

    46. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Some characters that you hate early you will love later, (haven't really seen the converse)

      Catelyn.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    47. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I would even add the queen on there. I don't personally believe she has any redeeming qualities.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    48. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      But later on, Jamie Lannister comes out as a actual decent person, and Tyron is never strictly bad, though he does do a couple things that aren't strictly good. Now the Queen...she is a witch...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    49. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

      He even went so far as to tear into his fans on his blog, saying he doesn't owe us anything....

      Really? I'd love to have that conversation with him. Maybe suggest he put THAT right on the cover so his readers know what to expect from him. Think he's got the balls to tell people BEFORE he's got their money that he'll finish the story if and when he feels like it?

    50. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Labcoat+Samurai · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Jaime cripple a child as one of his first acts in the books? Maybe he's not "epic fantasy Hitler", but I wouldn't say he's a "decent person" *exactly*. But then again, I only read the first two books, so I suppose it's possible that he somehow redeemed himself for doing that... hard to imagine how you redeem yourself for intentionally crippling a child (while actually trying to kill said child).

    51. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 1

      To each their own, I suppose.

    52. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      I'd suggest the Malazan Book of the Fallen too then, by Stephen Erikson.

      Get through Gardens of the Moon (the first book) and give the second one a go too, even if you don't like the first. It starts in (innovative) generic fantasy mode but swiftly turns up the ratchet, goes heavily multi-threaded, ties together story threads across millenia and has some of the harshest treatment for 'main' characters I've seen in mainstream books.

      I mostly love it for the constant ratcheting up of the bar for "don't fuck with..", where someone you don't fuck with in the first book or two is destroyed in a middle book just to demonstrate how much nastier someone else is - who is then ripped apart to prove that an earlier character whose abilities were doubted really is that nasty.

      Great writing, great story, excellent series.

    53. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Achra · · Score: 2
      The basics of his famous blog entry (which it seems has since been removed from his blog archive?):

      I have to admit, the rising tide of venom about the lateness of A DANCE WITH DRAGONS has gotten pretty discouraging. Emails, message boards, blogs, LJ comments, everywhere I look (and lots of places where I don't), people seem to be attacking me, defending me, using me as a bad example of something or other, whatever. I can and do avoid most of the online discussions, although I do regularly get emails from people eager to point out the latest URL where DANCE and I are being hashed over. I can do that, and I can screen the trollish comments here on LJ, but there's no avoiding the emails. Some of you are angry about the miniatures, the swords, the resin busts, the games. You don't want me "wasting time" on those, or talking about them here. Some of you are angry that I watch football during the fall. You don't want me "wasting time" on the NFL, or talking about it here. Some of you hate my other projects. You don't want me co-editing WARRIORS or the Vance anthology or STAR-CROSSED LOVERS or any of the other projects I'm doing with my old friend Gardner Dozois, and you get angry when I post about them here. For reasons I don't quite comprehend, the people who hate those projects seem to hate WILD CARDS even more. You really don't want me working on that, "wasting time" on that, and posting about it here. Some of you don't want me attending conventions, teaching workshops, touring and doing promo, or visiting places like Spain and Portugal (last year) or Finland (this year). More wasting time, when I should be home working on A DANCE WITH DRAGONS. After all, as some of you like to point out in your emails, I am sixty years old and fat, and you don't want me to "pull a Robert Jordan" on you and deny you your book. Okay, I've got the message. You don't want me doing anything except A SONG OF ICE AND FIRE. Ever. (Well, maybe it's okay if I take a leak once in a while?)

      https://grrumblers.wordpress.com/2010/08/25/quotes-of-the-week-grrm-brandon-sanderson/

      --
      Each processor would proceed sequentially as if it had been better for them not to rise against Saul.
    54. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      I think that the tagline "Pull a Jordan" is insulting and offensive

      I think it's apt and funny. I also hope Martin has the decency to finish his series before dies, but accept he may not be in complete control over that.

    55. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by PrimalChrome · · Score: 2

      All of you over sensitive clods whining about the phrase 'pulling a Jordan' need to just step back and look at it. Jordan had a good arc supposedly planned out. 3-4 books.

      He started making good cash on his books.....and suddenly started writing by the pound. Spending an entire page describing a few blades of grass or a barmaids perfect breasts. He stretched the series either intentionally or because of a horribly inflated ego and the lack of a decent editor who would slap him around and cut his bullshit.

      So he turned a 3 book series into a 13+ book series......or from another viewpoint....a guaranteed lifelong income. If you read his blog posts or his interviews as the series dragged on, he got progressively more full of himself and felt entitled to fan adoration. He was an ubergeek rockstar...and managed to milk it up until his death.

      So yes, pulling a Jordan is a bit heartless in that it refers to not finishing before dying.....but it is as much if not more about the attitude that made that fact a reality.

    56. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by RapmasterT · · Score: 0

      Jesus...what a dick. Some authors seem to be able to work on multiple projects at the same time, some can't. I get it. Martin needs to figure out that he's in the SECOND category and deal with it. It's not like we're saying "dont' take a leak", we're saying "stop working on other shit IF it means you can't finish current projects". It's not rocket science. This work ethic would get someone fired but quick in any other industry...and no apologies needed.

    57. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude,

      You're not paying him to write your book. You only pay him after he has written it.
      Well guess what, if he needs your cash he'll finish the book quickly. If he doesn't, he'll finish it when he's ready.

      In any other industry, you would pay up front. No excuses accepted.

    58. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by spun · · Score: 1

      Does no one here get that I don't really like Jordan's work?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    59. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Skywolfblue · · Score: 1

      /Seconded He's got a very significant bias to killing off Starks and only Starks, while everyone else basically gets a "get out of death free" card. At first I thought the whole killing off main characters would be cool and at random, by the time I read A Feast For Crows it became apparent that there's nothing random about it. That sucked most of the fun I had for the series out.

    60. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Devotion to her children.

      Love for one of her brothers. [Though after what he did at the end of the last book, she may not be so pleased with him. Assuming she survives, which in a GRRM book is not guaranteed.]

      Though personally I dislike Cersei as well, there are certainly worse characters. One of her spawn comes to mind.

    61. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      The fact this might be the first fantasy book I've ever seen in a Slashdot headline should tell you how good the series is. There is Tolkien who made it epic and there is Martin who makes it personal. Best Fantasy character writer ever.

    62. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, he did (and the child in question is one of the few unequivocally good characters). He gets a little better, but I'd still say he's far from being a good person.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    63. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, Fucktard. Are you high? How many industries pay you up front for work you haven't done?

    64. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 2

      It's not Jordan's fault he got amyloidosis, and he certainly never had any intention of creating an "interminable, never ending cash cow". It is true he got a bit lost around 7-8, but he pulled out of it quite nicely before he died - before he was even diagnosed, I believe. It was a mistake, or a series of them, that lead to problems in those books, not intent.

    65. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      >After so many books, there's just a mere hint of supernatural elements
      Except for, you know, dragon babies, early in the first book. Which is about where I quit reading; after all the boring descriptions of people standing on walls, that scene came as a disgusting shock. (partly because of the contrast, partly because that was before 4chan)

    66. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      He could do well like that, I think, but why would he want to? After finishing WoT, his name will made, big time, and he will be able to do whatever he feels like.

    67. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by RichiH · · Score: 1

      > Was anyone actually worried he would "pull a Jordan?"

      Having read both, I am not worried. Martin simply kills the guy who everyone thought would come out the victor in the end just to keep things interesting.

      It's not like Jordan where story-lines are partially reset just to make the story longer.

      And while that's probably the fault of the publisher, in my version of book two or three, about twenty pages happen twice. Main guy and random sidekick walk along a road, get diverted to a farm or something, come back, do some more stuff and _exactly the same diversion takes place_. Word for word.

    68. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 1

      He gets a little better, but I'd still say he's far from being a good person.

      The best that can probably be said for him is that he tries to be better - but that is significant.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    69. Re:Pull A Jordan? Seriously? by MattSausage · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the path Jamie takes from being a heinous child-murderer to slowly realizing the error of his ways and reluctantly, but inevitably changing them to see past his own nose is what is called a "Character Arc" in literary circles. I'm pretty sure it's a pretty common trope and isn't exactly meant to forgive him, but show growth of a man over a period of time.

  12. OP is incorrect in multiple ways by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. He's not actually done yet, Only a release date has been set. He's not announced he's done.
    2. It's not the conclusion to the series.

  13. Not the end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is book 5 (originally part of 4, but split out) out of at least 7. He can still pull a Jordan, and at his age and writing pace he probably will.

    In other news, Lil'Wombat is a fucking moron.

  14. "Conclusion" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One can assume the summary writer believes that mortality will necessarily intervene before Martin is able to write the two final books of the series.

  15. Aside from it not being the conclusion... by fireduck · · Score: 2

    According to his own website, GRRM hasn't even finished it yet. I'm not believing anything about this book until I can buy it.

    1. Re:Aside from it not being the conclusion... by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      His Livejournal had a confirmation a couple of days ago, but his editor posted somewhere else saying it wasn't in the can yet and she'd sleep better if it was. Like always I'll believe it when I see it.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    2. Re:Aside from it not being the conclusion... by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      No doubt. He's promised this book twice before and those promises were false.

    3. Re:Aside from it not being the conclusion... by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      I've been following it pretty closely since AFFC came out, and while he's said things like "I hope to be done by the end of this year" or "Aiming for next spring!", this is the first time I've seen him commit to a date.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  16. Just hope.. by malkavian · · Score: 2

    That it's not as disappointing as the last one..
    Maybe it's just me, but it seemed like a great departure from his normal style (the bad guys actually think about what they're doing, which makes them interesting), and had the "bad guys" acting like they'd never encountered politics before in their lives.. Just had a few "belief no longer suspended" moments in it..
    Hope this one goes back to the old "dark and gritty".. Victories are great and all, but in the earlier volumes, they were earned..

    1. Re:Just hope.. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      and had the "bad guys" acting like they'd never encountered politics before in their lives.

      That held true for Cersei sure, but then I think he's trying to describe her as paranoid and borderline insane. It's not completely clear who else is a definite bad guy in Feast.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    2. Re:Just hope.. by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 1

      Yep, Tywin always seemed to be the most competent leader out of any of the characters, like him or not (and mostly escaped being too clearly a "bad guy" as a result) but Cersei has never appeared to be remotely capable, and it seemed pretty clear that the other Lannisters realised that too.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    3. Re:Just hope.. by evildarkdeathclicheo · · Score: 1

      His writing infuriates me. I love the story, I love the depth, and I love how complex it is. What drives me crazy is that he will go on to describe a single meal over the course of 20 pages, yet he will kill off a main character in a few random sentences. The man clearly loves his food. -W

    4. Re:Just hope.. by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      Sometimes when people complain about what they feel are gratuitous sex scenes, he's responded with something to the effect of "No one complains about the gratuitous feasting." I guess that's not true anymore.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  17. "pull a Jordan"? by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 1

    Do you mean not drawing the story to completion in a small number of books, or leaving a series unfinished by PASSING AWAY? I don't know in what sense you meant that phrase but that's kind of offensive, isn't it?

    --
    Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    1. Re:"pull a Jordan"? by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

      Do you mean not drawing the story to completion in a small number of books, or leaving a series unfinished by PASSING AWAY? I don't know in what sense you meant that phrase but that's kind of offensive, isn't it?

      The latter. And it's supposed to be offensive. Jordan drug out the Wheel of Time series for over 20 years...it wasn't just possible he was going to die before finishing it, it was a statistical certainty. And he didn't give a rats ass. He worked on other projects, games, tv series...let WOT languish with 3-4 years between books, etc. So yes it's offensive, and he deserved it.

    2. Re:"pull a Jordan"? by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Let it language 3-4 (or 6) years between books while working on other projects... gee that doesn't sound at all familiar, now does it?

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    3. Re:"pull a Jordan"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    4. Re:"pull a Jordan"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let it language 3-4 (or 6) years

      At leased the spell-chequer thinks the languish is write!

    5. Re:"pull a Jordan"? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      Piss off, ass. You try writing something as massive and epic as WoT and let me know how well you stick to that and only that.

      And "statistical certainty"? He was only 58 when he died, there was no reason he shouldn't have lived to complete it.

  18. I will still read it though ... by sirdude · · Score: 2

    I loved the series until the whole Caitlyn-returns-from-the-dead-and-becomes-a-witch-queen incident. That was just ridiculous and smacked of one of his TV scripts. I will still read DWD though ...

    1. Re:I will still read it though ... by Hope+Thelps · · Score: 1

      I don't mind that; I think she's just hanging around so that at the right juncture she can reveal that Robb Stark named John Snow as his heir - even though she doesn't want to.

      --
      To summarise the summary of the summary: people are a problem. ~ h2g2
    2. Re:I will still read it though ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good point. I was wondering why she came back. No one else got to come back from the dead to avenge their treacherous deaths.

    3. Re:I will still read it though ... by sirdude · · Score: 1

      Considering how robust the plot had been until this point, it felt rather unimaginative and contrived. Deus ex and all that... In any case, Arya has been my favourite Stark and I can't wait to see how she develops.

    4. Re:I will still read it though ... by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      She also needs to find out that Jon is Ned's sister's child, and not Ned's bastard. So she can find out he was faithful to her, and she hated Jon for no reason.

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
  19. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woot. Now I can start to read the others. Been burned too many times with long series. I wait now. :)

  20. Monumentally stupid headline by Tridus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first LINE of TFA says " No. Sorry. Not done yet."

    How the hell do you go from that to "hey it's done!"?

    I mean come on. Even for Slashdot this is retarded.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Monumentally stupid headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, yes. He's not done yet. There's still work to be done.

      But at least he can give us the Ron Jeremy countdown. For this we should rejoice.

    2. Re:Monumentally stupid headline by okooolo · · Score: 1

      if only we weren't there before ... he's been almost done for years now.... at this point if Martin told me sky was blue I'd go outside and check

  21. My day is officially made by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I remember back in the day, as a young man full of optimism and energy, eagerly anticipating the second half of this marvelous novel.

    Now at last I might take it in my wrinkled, trembling hands and gaze in wonder through rheumy eyes, ever so slightly before the reaper takes my withered husk from this world!

    --
    This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    1. Re:My day is officially made by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      This is tagged funny, but it's really true.

      I read the first book in the series in the month after I graduated college. Since that time I have held eight jobs, been laid off from two; tried four separate freelance/personal businesses on the side; changed career paths three times; lived in nine houses in three significantly different geographical locations; visited 44 of the 50 US states; had two romantic relationships with two big dry spells in between; met, romanced, and married my wife, and just celebrated our fifth anniversary with our first child on the way. It has been a really, really, really long time between the first book and the fifth.

      On the other hand, I'm still driving the same Honda Civic, which I also bought that summer. It's got 200,000 miles on it, which is about one mile for each page of the Fire and Ice series.

  22. Read your sources by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No. Sorry. Not done yet.
      I'm close, though. Watch this space. When the book is done, you will read it here. "

    Last time I checked that statement was pretty definitive, he isn't done yet, but he's close enough to set a release date. At least read the site you link to...

  23. Delays by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

    This book has had so many ridiculous setbacks and delays that it's become comical. How many times was book 4 rewritten, only to have become split (and disappointing)? And then it's another six years before book 5, which is simply the other half of book 4? According to him, he's already written some chapters from the next two books. Why? I understand the value of having notes for what's going to happen, but to take the time to write full chapters when your current work isn't finished, and fans are chomping at the bit?

    I'll get this one. I've already read the other four books, so I might as well. But I think that the "pulling a Jordan" comment is too soon. I am skeptical we will ever actually see the end to this series. I'd written this one off, but apparently I was wrong. Hopefully that release date sticks, this time.

    --
    If you can't convince them, convict them.
    1. Re:Delays by Tridus · · Score: 1

      Well there's another issue with the summary. If he's got stuff for two more books, this is hardly the end of the series.

      This one is so bad it's comical. "The completed conlusion of the series" is actually the not-completed not-conclusion of the series.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    2. Re:Delays by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      There are a lot of different character threads in Ice and Fire, if he's working on one it may be easier to keep writing even if he goes beyond the timeline of the current book. On the other hand, maybe he just does it to piss off his readers.

    3. Re:Delays by godefroi · · Score: 1

      Extremely ironic note:

      I originally started reading GRRM specifically because he was recommended to me by fans that claimed he was the anti-Jordan because I wouldn't have to wait for him to get around to publishing the ending to his series.

      Hah. The joke's on me, Sanderson is going to finish WOT (and do an absolutely brilliant job at it too, by the way) but who's going to finish this series?

      --
      Karma: Poor (Mostly affected by lame karma-joke sigs)
    4. Re:Delays by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, Sanderson is doing a surprisingly good job, and I look forward to A Memory of Light. I wonder, though, if The Wheel of Time is a series that can be ended in a way that's satisfying to most fans. I guess we shall see in one year.

      If you enjoy darker fantasy, I recommend the Malazan Book of the Fallen. The magic isn't subtle like it is in A Song of Ice and Fire, but it's an excellent (if somewhat unconventional) series. Looking at the release dates, the first book was published in 1999, and the 10th and final book just came out on the 1st. That's what I call a fast author, and I feel like there's less bloat than there is in GRRM's work (though, both being epic fantasy, they each have their share of bloat; it comes with the territory).

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    5. Re:Delays by aslagle · · Score: 1

      If you like Sanderson, definitely read "The Way of Kings". The magic system in that world is different.

      But then again, a lot of people in this thread are leery of beginning series that are just on their first book.... :)

    6. Re:Delays by okooolo · · Score: 1

      I second that .. that one blew me away ... I'd also recommend brett's painted man

    7. Re:Delays by AuMatar · · Score: 1

      THe problem with the Malazan series is- what the fuck is going on? Really- what's the underlieing story arc? So far as I can tell, there is none. It's "shit happens, people die".

      --
      I still have more fans than freaks. WTF is wrong with you people?
    8. Re:Delays by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Either you didn't read very far, or you didn't pay enough attention (or just didn't give it a chance). It's undoubtedly a harder series to read, but there's a lot going on there. There are three primary story arcs going on--but even so, it's not as focused as 99% of other stories are. The "problem" is that the book doesn't go into any real effort to explain it to you, so you have to figure everything out as you go along. Some (many, I'd imagine) people don't like this, so it's just not the right series for them.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    9. Re:Delays by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I actually already read The Way of Kings. Great book, but it could have been better if about 200 pages had been taken out. There's a lot of repetitive action with Kaladin and Shallan. It's an effective way of hammering in the facts of their own situations, but I "got it" in their first few chapters.

      After reading it, I questioned just why the hell I did so. Not because I didn't like it, but because it'll likely be 2 years before we see the next one. I went to a book signing for The Towers of Midnight (Wheel of Time 13), and somebody in front of me asked Sanderson if it was hard working on WoT and Stormlight Archive at the same time. Sanderson said yes, it was, and that he wouldn't work on Stormlight 2 until Wheel of Time is finished. Oh well.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    10. Re:Delays by aslagle · · Score: 1

      For those of us used to the waits George gives us, 2 years is a piece of cake.

    11. Re:Delays by Yaztromo · · Score: 1

      According to him, he's already written some chapters from the next two books. Why?

      It's my understanding that some of the chapters written for DWD didn't quite fit, and needed to be moved in the timeline to a future point to be dealt with in one of the future novels.

      The way he writes his novels, I can understand. Some of the characters stories are probably a lot easier for him to write all at once, even if you don't intend those parts to be included in the timeline dealt with in the next book.

      Of course, I wouldn't be surprised if he winds up rewriting those chapters as well (not that we'll necessarily ever know...).

      Yaz.

  24. I'm still worried.. by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

    And everyone was worried that he was going to pull a Jordan."

    There's still two books to go, and Martin is 62 years old. Since it was SEVEN years between "a feast for crows" and "a dance with dragons", he would be 76 at this rate before he finishes. That's beyond the average american lifespan, so yes...a "jordan" is a very real possibility.

    1. Re:I'm still worried.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common misconception!

      It is true that the average male life expectancy is 75.5 at birth. But that number includes all the things that kill children, people in their teens, people in their twenties, etc.

      If, like Martin, you survive to age 62, then your remaining life expectancy is 81.65 years of age.

      So we're safe!

      (PS: Understanding this concept about life expectancies is pretty important for retirement planning too! If you live to 65, then your American male life expectancy is 82 years.)

  25. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by RapmasterT · · Score: 2

    I'll echo someone I read a couple of days ago and say this is the longest wait for half of a book I've ever encountered.

    Agreed. If you can't see a big "F-U" from Martin between the lines, you aren't paying very close attention. 100% due to Martin and Robert Jordan, I will never, EVER pick up and start reading another book series that isn't completed the day I buy the first one. Screw you guys, screw you all.

  26. Lots of hate for Jordan? by Onuma · · Score: 2

    While Robert Jordan may have died before he finished the series, I think he and his wife/editor made a good decision in selecting Brandon Sanderson as co-author to complete the final 3 installments. While many people got jaded around books 4-5-6-7 (YMMV), I think Jordan picked up his original style around books 10-11; A Knife of Dreams was fantastic. 12 and 13 were co-authored, but were both excellent works. A Memory of Light is still in the process, but it is expected to be just as good, or better than, the previous two.

    So even if GRRM does kick the bucket, if he "pulls a Jordan" that means that he'll have written out enough notes for a solid conclusion to his fictional world and have selected a competent co-author who can finish out strongly. Is that such a worst-case-scenario?

    --
    What else can happen when an unstoppable force collides with an immovable object?
    1. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      HA! And I thought it was book 10 that everyone hated, I have found a fan!

      But yes, selecting Sanderson was a good decision, he was highly motivated, and the goal was in sight. He cut the crap and ran it full steam, and so far, it has worked awesomely.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    2. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      my biggest beef is that sanderson doesn't seem to know (or care) how to write genre-appropriate dialog and narration. there's a huge pile of epic fantasy language conventions which he completely ignores, both in his own stuff and in his two WoT books. in ToM, a firework or something was said to have "zipped" into the sky--abysmal. that word has no business in an epic fantasy novel. half his aes sedai talk like sitcom characters, with snark being their main mode. i keep expecting rand to say "hey you" or "what's up".

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    3. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      It's a matter of offsets. For example, I absolutely hated his "Ladies and Dice" rant for Mat in TGS, but seeing as the over all story flow had improved amazingly, I forgave these minor niggles.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    4. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by wastedlife · · Score: 1

      George R.R. Martin has stated in the past that he has directed his notes and unfinished writings to be destroyed when he dies. So, if we want this series concluded, he needs to finish before he dies or depend on fanfiction (which he opposes).

      --
      Said, "It's just like dice but it's got more sides And it tells me who lives and who dies"
    5. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      While I agree there's something off about the tone of Sanderson's dialog, I'm not sure I agree that you've identified it. I'm not even sure that epic fantasy language conventions are in and of themselves a good thing.

      There is something tonally off at times, but really I think he just writes poor prose and poorer dialog (although I did enjoy Lightsong and to a lesser extent Denth in Warbringer -- he seems to be able to pull of snark, although Shallan in the Way of Kings was a big step back in that regard). I really like the content of his stories, which is why I keep reading his books, but I don't like the mechanics of reading them. He reminds me of Isaac Asimov in that respect.

    6. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he's firmly in the "my books are my children" camp of authors, and he wants NOTHING done with his works once he's dead. Hopefully he picks up the pace once this one is finally done...

    7. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that if you slog through the middle part, it picks up in the end.

      The problem is the middle part is around 1.9 MILLION words long (per wikipedia). It's one thing to have a dull spot in your series. It's another when the dull spot is three or four times longer than the Lord of the Rings trilogy.

      Book 1 was really good. By Book 3 I had doubts. By the start of Book 5 I realized he was just wasting my time. There's too much great literature out there to read Books 5 through 9 in the hopes that it will eventually pick up.

    8. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by okooolo · · Score: 1

      ok ... we're screwed...

    9. Re:Lots of hate for Jordan? by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      4-5-6 are awesome

      Just got done re-reading six, so it is fresh in my mind. We'll see how seven goes, that's where I remember it slipping.

      Agree that his last books, and Sanderson's, are excellent.

  27. Not "Completed" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Christ, the first line of his comment is that it isn't done.
    "No. Sorry. Not done yet."

  28. Pull a Jordan? by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    Why do I care if he wants to play baseball?

  29. It isn't done, the headline lies by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

    It isn't done. It's just 'done enough' that the publishers feels like they should roll out a date. The publisher has, at various times, rolled out dates in the past only to have them be missed. I will believe it when I see it.

  30. Rank Down - article misrepresenting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Book isnt the conclusion of the series
    The Book isn't Done yet
    This shouldn't have been published.
    To be fair, this comment probably sucks too

  31. Not done yet... by Logarhythmic · · Score: 1
    Way to not RTFA. The FIRST LINE of the GRRM's post says:

    No. Sorry. Not done yet.

    Yes, they've set a date for publishing. But really, let's get the summary right at least.

    --
    "Before criticizing someone, first walk a mile in his shoes. Then, you'll be a mile away... and you'll have his shoes."
  32. meanwhile by bhcompy · · Score: 2

    Meanwhile, Steven Erikson just completed the 10 book Malazan Book of the Fallen series, which is at least the equal of ASoIaF, as of Tuesday with the release of the 10th book. He started the series 4 years after Martin started ASoIaF.

    1. Re:meanwhile by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      I have not read the it, but I have heard Malazan is a nice series. Would you recommend it?

      And talking of long series, Jim Butcher is also good on doling out instalment on his Dresden series, and so is Terry Pratchett on his Discworld set (though technically, they are at least half a dozen separate series rolled into one).

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    2. Re:meanwhile by Corbets · · Score: 1

      The Malazan series is the most fascinating work of fantasy I've ever read. Highly recommended.

      Butcher's Dresden Files are also highly entertaining and well written, though I strongly suggest avoiding his pure fantasy works (the name escapes me at the moment, but they're absolute crap, and I'm surprised they're written by the same man).

    3. Re:meanwhile by ryzvonusef · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be talking of Codex Alera, would you? I kinda liked those, though yes, the style was markedly different, I guess he was trying to experiment with a different style with those six. But not bad, just...different.

      --
      I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
    4. Re:meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erikson has written half of his series (FIVE BOOKS) in the time it took martin to write this one. And erikson has been writing novellas on the side!

    5. Re:meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i'll pile on with the recommendations too.

      I've really enjoyed reading the series.

    6. Re:meanwhile by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 1

      Eh.

      Malazan reads like it's the author novelizing his D&D game. That's not really a complement, even though I'm a longtime pen and paper gamer.

      (In actuality, apparently it's his GURPS game -- but I figure more people will know what D&D is.)

    7. Re:meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have not read the it, but I have heard Malazan is a nice series. Would you recommend it?

      Not without knowing what you like.

      I found the books tedious and boring to read, lacking in interest to me. I've got 3 of the books, I've not finished any of them.

      the world was interesting enough, but the way it was presented was so spotty that the depth did not feel very interesting. Plus I've got to admit it felt more than a little like a game.

    8. Re:meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a huge fan of the series, but it has its critics. What's more, I can't say the critics are entirely *wrong*.

      What you get with Erikson is this... You're thrown into the deep end of a world that's barely explained, near the end of a war which you don't understand, watching wizards who use undescribed "warrens", against a powerful guy who isn't explained in which a lot of characters you don't know are all killed. And that's the first chapter.

      Over the course of the series, you see glimpses going back 300,000 or more years, and there are characters who've been 'alive' in some semblance of the term for the whole time. You meet gods, demigods, and mortals who are all some degrees of insanely powerful, alongside mere mortals who are nevertheless crucial for the narrative - and some of the best characters in the series. You'll get philosophy, humor, brilliant parts, and some doldrums. At least two of the books may very well make you cry at the end, even if you're not the sort who does, and almost all will make you laugh out loud at some point. Many might also make you angry. By a few books into the series, the whole thing starts making sense, and going back to re-read earlier books is intensely rewarding because Erikson's writing is just *that* deep and layered.

      It's wazoo, gonzo, over-the-top, and megapowered. But for all that, it's my favorite series and one which I'm re-reading for the fourth time.

    9. Re:meanwhile by Groghunter · · Score: 1

      If it's a race, Jim Butcher has pumped out 13 Dresden novels (Look, they're KINDA fantasy) in 11 years, plus 6 Codex Alera books. and Dresden novels, while not Wheel of Time long, have gotten pretty lengthy these days...

    10. Re:meanwhile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From someone who has read the first 9 books of Malazan (most of those more than once):

      Malazan's world is extremely complex and hard to get into, but the payoff is huge. If you like fantasy and are willing to get past the initial barrier, you'll probably love this series (as I do).

    11. Re:meanwhile by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      But I think that is what makes it real. Eventually everyone makes a bad roll

    12. Re:meanwhile by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      the 10 book Malazan Book of the Fallen series, which is at least the equal of ASoIaF

      That's very much a matter of opinion. Personally, ASoIaF has definitely gone downhill, but when it's good, it's spectacularly good. I read the first of the Malazan books, threw it straight in the trash, and would be perfectly happy to never read another.

    13. Re:meanwhile by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      The first one, which is the worst one. Can't have it both ways. Either read them all or don't, but don't base entire opinions off one book, otherwise it's still a wash because Feast wasn't much of a feast.

    14. Re:meanwhile by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      Either read them all or don't, but don't base entire opinions off one book

      So my options are:

      1) Form an opinion of a series without reading any of them, or
      2) Read all 10 books in a series before forming an opinion

      Yeah, good luck selling that.

    15. Re:meanwhile by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Hell, read the second one. The "Chain of Dogs" portion of the second novel was one of the strongest in the series. What I usually suggest to everyone is to read the novellas, as they're short and pretty much nail what Erikson does

    16. Re:meanwhile by Hortensia+Patel · · Score: 1

      Does each book stand on its own fairly well? 'Cause I can't remember anything at all from the one I read.

    17. Re:meanwhile by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Other than the characters and knowledge of the world, the second book will stand alone fine. So will the 3rd book(takes place with different characters at same time of 2nd) and 5th book(completely new characters). The first book, IIRC, was put into the series at the request of the publisher as a way to establish some things and was written a long time before it was published. The story line in the first book is referenced at times in later books, but, generally, you can probably get away with avoiding it until you understand more about the world(which makes reading the first book an altogether different experience).

    18. Re:meanwhile by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      To expand a little more, the story from the first book doesn't continue into the later books, but some characters are developed and established in the first book, particularly Crokus, Apsalar, and Ganoes Paran. Those characters are present in book 2, but they're not the primary focus, and you can glean along the way whatever you need to know possibly.

    19. Re:meanwhile by Corbets · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't be talking of Codex Alera, would you? I kinda liked those, though yes, the style was markedly different, I guess he was trying to experiment with a different style with those six. But not bad, just...different.

      Yeah, that's what I meant. I found them hideous - though to each their own. The writing had no real suspense, the characters seemed shallow and one-dimensional, the plot made unbelievable jumps (unbelievable in terms of human nature; something I feel the Dresden files have a much better grip on), etc.

  33. Won't believe it until it ships by Vrallis · · Score: 1

    I won't believe it until it actually ships from Amazon. They had a publishing date set years ago, I think they even put it up for pre-order...everything sounded like the book was done and at the printers. Now we find out it STILL isn't really finished?

    What's really a shame is I'm just wrapping up re-reading the previous four books in anticipation of the new TV series. We can probably thank that for him finally (hopefully) getting this book finished. The teaser preview for the series sounds good. Hopefully they won't completely and utterly destroy it like they did the Sword of Truth series.

  34. Gaiman's perspective by mblase · · Score: 4, Interesting

    May be a good time to post Neil Gaiman's blog entry on why George R.R. Martin is not your bitch.

    1. Re:Gaiman's perspective by EricWright · · Score: 1

      That post makes me glad my name is not Gareth! Thanks for sharing.

    2. Re:Gaiman's perspective by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      True enough, but that doesn't mean we, the readers, don't have a right to be pissed off. He's selling a product, and we're expecting new version of that product. If our needs aren't met maybe we won't buy the product. I'll probably read the new book but maybe I'll do a petty protest like getting it from the library instead of buying it ;)

      It's like a cell phone. I bought a Samsung Moment and at the time it was a good enough phone. But lo and behold Samsung is poor at updates. The phone does what it was supposed to when I bought it, Samsung had no contract with me to provide free updates. That's all fine - but I might be a lot more hesitant about buying a new Samsung phone in the future because they left me hanging and were slow with updates.

    3. Re:Gaiman's perspective by Drathus · · Score: 1

      While I normally love Neil, in response to that particular piece he can kiss my lily white ass.

      There's a vast difference between someone "out there typing what you want to read right now" (Neil's assertion) and thinking that it's a disappointment that someone is failing to meet the delivery expectations they themselves have set.

      If at work I were to promise my boss that I could complete a project in six months, then turn around and have it take 24 times as long? I wouldn't have had a job after twice as long as my estimate. And my boss certainly wouldn't accept being told "Get on with your life."

      My problem with Martin has never been that it has taken time to write the books, which is what Neil's posit is. If he had said from the beginning that it would be out when it's complete I wouldn't have had a problem.

      But it was he himself who set the expectations and failed to deliver. "It's half written, six months." "Next fall." "Next fall." etc.

      My two bits..

    4. Re:Gaiman's perspective by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      If at work I were to promise my boss that I could complete a project in six months, then turn around and have it take 24 times as long? I wouldn't have had a job after twice as long as my estimate. And my boss certainly wouldn't accept being told "Get on with your life."

      Interesting, so you consider yourself Martin's boss? On what grounds?

    5. Re:Gaiman's perspective by Drathus · · Score: 1

      Bad analogy on my part. No, I don't consider me his boss.

      I was trying to give an example of someone on the delivery end of an established expectation. The employer->employee one is simply the most common to go to for an example.

      I consider myself in the group he has made commitments to that he has failed (many times) to meet his stated delivery expectation.

      That is the crux of my frustration towards him, and I don't think that frustration is (as Neil said in that article) is in any way because he works for me, or that he's "my bitch." Just that he over promises and under-delivers.

      In the end I'm sure I'll buy the book, read it and based on his past works quite enjoy it. Doesn't mean I don't feel annoyance at him as a person for the way he sets that expectation and then when he fails to meet it.

      As I said in the message you replied to (yet didn't quote) had he not set an expectation (let alone continued to set it and not meet it a hand-full of times over the years) I wouldn't feel any frustration towards him over this. I don't care if a book takes as long as it takes; my frustration is entirely in how he handled the expectation of it's completion.

    6. Re:Gaiman's perspective by Confusador · · Score: 1

      And the point is well taken. But it's worth noting that many of the comments are not saying that he owes us, just that "I'm not buying this until he finishes the series," which is perfectly valid. Because I'm not his bitch either.

  35. It was to be 7 parts now it's 8 .. the article ... by aergern · · Score: 1

    WRONG!

    This is the second half of part 4 of ASoFaI. He has 3 more books which comprise the 2nd story arc. This story should be pulled as it's just wrong.

    --
    Tell me what you believe...I'll tell you what you should see.
  36. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    may i introduce you to the chtorr?

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  37. What's the deal? by wandazulu · · Score: 1

    I know several people who are very happy about this news, and I admit I actually have no idea who he is or what series this is the next book of. I know, Google is my friend, etc., but what I'm really asking is, and this is the perfect place to ask, "Why should I read this series, especially given that it seems he seems takes an awful lot of time to complete a book". Sounds like he'd give Knuth a run for his money.

    I'm honestly not trolling: I'm really interested and am just looking for more subjective information about what this whole series is "about", and what people like about it.

    Okay, I'll turn in my geek card now.

    1. Re:What's the deal? by bhcompy · · Score: 2

      The first 3 books of the series are among the best 3 consecutive books written in the fantasy genre. 4 dropped off a lot, though. It's an extension of Glen Cook in that it is gritty and people die, but it is in the style of high fantasy rather than Cook's rather accessible everyday writing style(and book length). The books are very light on magic, but high on mysticism and legend. Think of it mostly as a historical middle age book with a bit of fantasy/magic thrown in(it does grow with the series though). If you want a teaser for the style, read The Hedge Knight short story.

      The best combination of authors I can come with is the realism of Cook plus the settings, intrigue, and quality of a Guy G Kay novel.

    2. Re:What's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first three books are totally worth it. Just read them.

    3. Re:What's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be honest, I don't actually know where to start, but others have already covered the gist of it in earlier posts. Still, I will try and give a summary:

      First off, the characters. Whilst they broadly fall into 'good' and 'evil/bad' categories, it is far more complex than that. Every one of them is out to further their own agenda (or simply survive), and so there are elements of good and bad in all of them. Some fall closer to the extremes, but everyone fits somewhere on that scale of grey ultimately.

      Second, scale. Akin to LOTR, these stories take place in a world where clearly much much more is going on. Whilst the books primarily cover the bit of it that GRRM wants to focus on, there are references to both a long history, and lands over the horizon where things may be vastly different. I find this depth and breadth to be a core feature of the series, and find it much more engaging than others in this genre that seem shallower to me. Even something as simple as the three word motto of House Stark adds so much portent and foreboding, it is almost palpable - 'Winter is coming'

      Thirdly, subtlety. The books take place in a world where magic and the supernatural clearly exist, but those aspects are handled very well. There are no magic missiles flying around, or people getting turned into frogs, but there are more than a few occasions where it is clear something beyond the mundane has happened, but it is less flashy and ostentatious. This isn't swords and sorcery, this is politics and warfare, with a respectable hint of the mysterious mixed in.

      I have been reading this series since its initial release, and have loved every bit of it. Sure, some moments were slower than others, but the story as a whole is one of the best I have read. I was going to say something over the top like 'If I were given the choice of lose a leg or never be able to read this series, I would lose the leg', but that is clearly silly. Still, I would be willing to trade a few toes in...

    4. Re:What's the deal? by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      I just picked up this series a month or two ago for similar reasons and it is definitely worth the read. It is very well written and the only series in the fantasy genre that I think is better is Patrick Rothfuss's Kingkiller Chronicles.

      The two series are very different though and the real defining feature of GRRM's series is that it is epic in the truest sense of the word while still keeping very organized separate plot lines that interact in meaningful ways. I enjoyed the sci-fi books "The Dragon Never Sleeps", and some of the later Dune series, but they suffered from poor organization and it made keeping track of everything a chore.

    5. Re:What's the deal? by Kevin+Stevens · · Score: 1

      Maybe not in the spirit of your post, but I don't think you should read this series until it is done.

      I read the first book of the series, a Game of Thrones, after hearing it was awesome. I used to be a very heavy reader of sci-fi in my teens, and I was looking to getting back to some of that, so I figured this would be a good re-entry. The first book was really historical fiction, there was nothing fantasy about it. There were knights and all that, and talk of dragons, and something scary in the icy north, but the actual magical elements in the story are miniscule.

      The book was very heavy and overdone. I have long felt that there is no reason any fiction book should be more than 500 pages, and at 900 pages, GOT convinced me I should make a rule about not reading excessively long books. One thing that really bugged me is that there are tons of characters, and they are all pretty much introduced at once. At one point I actually started taking notes, as most people had nicknames, and I guess to keep things from being repetitive, how characters would be referred to was constantly changing (IE for a character named Dirk Fantasyman, he might be referred to as dirk, fantasyman, some nickname he had, his title, by his relation to another character (IE the cousin of lord somethingorother). It made things quite confusing, especially as the changeups weren't even consistent in a single conversation. Many times I would sit there and be like whoa, where did the cousin of lord somethingorother come in, then I would reread until I remembered that Dirk was that cousin... annoying.

      GOT in the end was a good book. But it was rather drawn out, and when the first book is 900 pages and is convoluted with many plot lines, I just don't think that bodes well for the rest of the series. Martin seems like the type that just likes to drag things out, and there just seem to be a lot of parallel's with the Wheel of Time series. I personally am waiting for the series to end before I decide to finish the series.

    6. Re:What's the deal? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      "Why should I read this series, especially given that it seems he seems takes an awful lot of time to complete a book".

      My answer to everyone who asks is: "Read the first one, then pretend that the author died."

      Storm of Swords is definitely in my top 10 list of Fantasy novels, but sadly, in my opinion (and of many others I've talked to), it's all downhill from there.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    7. Re:What's the deal? by halivar · · Score: 1

      There is the big difference in that when Glen Cook kills off an awesome character, they're usually doing something awesome at the time. When GRRM kills off an awesome character, they go down like a little bitch. It's always anti-climactic and disappointing.

    8. Re:What's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Martin's prose, characters, and dialog are leaps and bounds better than Guy G Kay's. I have always found Guy G Kay's characters to have only a single note and to often act unrealistically. Martin's characters, on the other hand, have the most depth and act the most realistically of any characters in fantasy (and I would argue that they even approach being on par with great characters in literature).

    9. Re:What's the deal? by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      I can understand that. It's just hard to find a comparison. I do believe that The Lions of Al-Rassan is the best standalone novel in the genre, though, hands down.

    10. Re:What's the deal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read The Lions of Al-Rassan awhile ago, and while I would say that it is a well written novel, I personally would not go so far as to say it is the best novel in the genre. I am not sure what it is about Kay's novels, but they just end up being forgetful for me. It may just be a stylistic preference, but the works just don't resonate with me, and I find them to lack subtlety (particularily Tigana, which is the only other Kay novel I have read).

      I do think that Storm of Swords is one of the best written novels in the genre, but it depends on the previous two entries in the series to build it up. For stand alone works, Tooth and Claw is certainly interesting, as is Heroes Die, but I would be hesitant to say either one is the best work in the genre (Tooth and Claw would need to be a bit longer with a little more depth, Heroes Die probably just isn't for everybody).

      And although it is in the wrong genre, The WindUp Girl is the only novel that has impressed me lately. If you haven't read it, you might want to give it a look, it is certainly worth a read.

  38. lol by guspasho · · Score: 1

    "The dragons are coming. Prepare to dance."

    1. Re:lol by Kong+the+Medium · · Score: 1

      You are wrong. The dragons are already there,even if they are not adult yet.

      Winter is coming.

      And so are the Others.

      --
      ... whenever a text is transmitted, variation occurs. This is because human beings are careless, fallible, and occasiona
  39. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    may i introduce you to the chtorr?

    No shit, been waiting for the Chtorr series to start again for almost FIFTEEN YEARS.

  40. Finishes a dance with dragons... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now on to the punch bowl for refreshments.

  41. Pre-Order by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can pre-order it at amazon.com. That's a good sign. However, we've been down that road before, too, with this same book.

    None-the-less, I hope it's the real deal this time.

  42. Jordan by mseeger · · Score: 2

    Hi,

    i consider the reference to Jordan as bad taste and offensive toward Jordans family. Do you think he intended to die? As a comment, i would have expected such a missstep, but as story this is a very, very low level.

    Furthermore: the story belongs to the author and only him. If he decides to take 17 years for the next book (as Tokien did after The Hobbit), one has to wait. I would rather wait in vain, than pushing for a book the author feels not happy with.

    Disappointed, Martin

    1. Re:Jordan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      i consider the reference to Jordan as bad taste and offensive toward Jordans family. Do you think he intended to die? As a comment, i would have expected such a missstep, but as story this is a very, very low level.

      Furthermore: the story belongs to the author and only him. If he decides to take 17 years for the next book (as Tokien did after The Hobbit), one has to wait. I would rather wait in vain, than pushing for a book the author feels not happy with.

      Disappointed, Martin

      It's a 2 way street, if everyone who read the series knew he was going to take 5 years to write half a book, no one would buy until the series was finished. If no one buys until the series is finished the author never writes anything past the first book.
      The author does in fact owe his or her readers to a certain extent.

    2. Re:Jordan by mseeger · · Score: 1

      if everyone who read the series knew he was going to take 5 years to write half a book, no one would buy until the series was finished.

      Contrary to my experience. No one usually cares how many books a series contains before he/she buys it. Once they started with the first and liked it, they buy the next ones wether the series is finished or not.

      The author does in fact owe his or her readers to a certain extent.

      100% disagreement on this. Being a fan does not give you one ounce of rights towards the author (or any other artist). You pay and get the book; this is the complete transaction. Everything beyond this is voluntary service from the author. CU, Martin

    3. Re:Jordan by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      I think he realized he had a guaranteed income stream which was larger than what he would get from residuals alone and decided to milk it. Did he intend to die before finishing? No - very few people have a stated intention to die, after all. But I do not believe he had after book six or so any intention of writing the story he initially set out to write in the way he initially expected to write it.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
    4. Re:Jordan by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      100% disagreement on this. Being a fan does not give you one ounce of rights towards the author (or any other artist). You pay and get the book; this is the complete transaction. Everything beyond this is voluntary service from the author. CU, Martin

      I disagree with you. When an author creates a book, it's already done. Any sales of that book are a down payment on the author writing more. If I didn't care if the author wrote anymore, I'd not buy the book but get an electronic copy somewhere and read that.

      Now, in some cases, this is a general "You do good stuff, please keep it up.", with no specific expectation. But sometimes there is an expectation associated with it, particularly in the case of a series.

      But, I would rather wait for the book the author wants to write, rather than forcing h(im/er) to publish a book that isn't ready.

    5. Re:Jordan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, before his unexpected illness, Jordan had every appearance of finishing his main series and then writing more after. Before that there were already jokes that neither author would finish their series, but I think most thought Jordan had better odds than Martin. Martin doesn't exactly look like the healthiest guy in the world.

      Tolkien didn't hype up Lord of the Rings, then suddenly stop writing it in the middle. If he had, we'd have every right to be upset. The gripes against GRRM are that type. Imagine if JK Rowling had taken a decade off after book 5, after a decade of telling us there would be seven of them. Imagine if she was a few decades older, too.

    6. Re:Jordan by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

      The author does in fact owe his or her readers to a certain extent.

      100% disagreement on this. Being a fan does not give you one ounce of rights towards the author (or any other artist). You pay and get the book; this is the complete transaction. Everything beyond this is voluntary service from the author. CU, Martin

      But, you are obligated to TELL ANYBODY that will sit still for three seconds, that "No, you should start reading his books. He's never going to finish." A good author gets a little bit more than his cut of that complete transaction, he also gets recommendations to other to read or not read his work. I stopped recommending Jordan when it was clear he had no ending to his series.

    7. Re:Jordan by christurkel · · Score: 1

      I agree with you 100%. "Pull a Jordan". The guy died of a terrible disease! How insensitive can one be?

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    8. Re:Jordan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second the bad taste/offensive sentiment. I'm glad someone called it out.

    9. Re:Jordan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not that he intended to die, most people make this comparison because Jordan is famous for taking 1000+ pages to tell a story that should have taken 1/2 that. I used to be a huge Jordan fan, but after 10+ books of the same crap regurgitated onto the page it gets a bit tiring. None of his characters grow or really go through any changes throughout the books, and eventually they all seem to start running together into common stereotypes. By book 8, it almost seems like he is writing a parody of his own writing style! How many times does EVERY female character have to cross her arms under her bosom and sniff at EVERY male character when he inevitably does or says something stupid again?

    10. Re:Jordan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfffft, fuck you.

      Here in the real world, we have contracts and deadlines. If I had to complete a project in 6 months but ended up taking 36, I wouldn't have a job.

    11. Re:Jordan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a reference to Jordan's passing, but in his choice long before his death to drag the series out into unreadability to milk it for all that he could, rather than finish the story in grand fashion. The apocolypse was always just around the corner, but never actually went on to happen. There is a natural human instinct to want to hear the end of the story. Jordon manipulated that instinct and a great many people who enjoyed the first few books just wanted to know what the end of the story was, but Jordon merely teased it. He could have finished long before his death. It would have been a grand 6-book series if not for Jordon's greed.

  43. Sanderson to the rescue? by Hey_bob · · Score: 1

    I'm starting to hope that Brandon Sanderson (who is also not my bitch) would finish the series, as he is doing with WoT. Lets hope that GRRM leaves plenty of notes behind.

    1. Re:Sanderson to the rescue? by increment1 · · Score: 1

      I would not hope for that. Not to knock Sanderson, but Martin writes some of the best prose in fantasy, so it would be a shame to have another author attempt to finish his work.

      If you don't believe me on this, pick up a Storm of Swords and read any chapter (or just the prologue), and then compare it back to back with a chapter from another fantasy novel. In most cases the comparison is striking.

      Few authors are as talented as Martin when it comes to complexity, characters, and prose.

  44. HELL YES I WOULD RECOMMEND IT by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the all caps, but yes, Malazan Book of the Fallen is far superior to Song of Ice and Fire. It's dark, it's gritty, and yet it's redeeming, portrays all the characters as more than one dimensional stock, and manages to include philosophical critiques of the world, religion, philosophy, economics, emotion, and fanaticism of all stripes without breaking stride or tone. It's the only series that has made me care about a couple of villains as well as the heroes. It is simply amazing. Just be warned: to start the series you're going to have to slog through approximately half of "Gardens of the Moon" before you start getting it. Once you do though, you'll be hooked.

    --
    Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    1. Re:HELL YES I WOULD RECOMMEND IT by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Yes. You have to go into knowing that Erikson does NOT provide you with any handholding to explain how things work. This isn't Dragonlance. There is no explanation about anything other than when it uncovers itself throughout the series. I found it to be an interesting way to get into a very deep and broad world, and I respect the author for not spending any time to dumb it down, because in the end it's worth it.

      Your best friend will be the list on characters in the front of the books and the appendix in the back when it comes to those WTF is that questions, but even then, it's just a skeletal framework. The real information is fleshed out throughout the books.

      Also, you will hate Karsa, but then you will witness.

    2. Re:HELL YES I WOULD RECOMMEND IT by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      Also, you will hate Karsa, but then you will witness.

      And you will stand at attention when you witness! And you will cheer. And then you'll need a cigarette afterwards, because it's just that goddamn awesome.

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    3. Re:HELL YES I WOULD RECOMMEND IT by imbaczek · · Score: 1

      It's dark, it's gritty, and yet it's redeeming, portrays all the characters as more than one dimensional stock, and manages to include philosophical critiques of the world, religion, philosophy, economics, emotion, and fanaticism of all stripes without breaking stride or tone. It's the only series that has made me care about a couple of villains as well as the heroes. It is simply amazing. Just be warned: to start the series you're going to have to slog through approximately half of "Gardens of the Moon" before you start getting it. Once you do though, you'll be hooked.

      if you replace "Gardens of the Moon" with "A Game of Thrones", you get a very good description of a song of fire and ice. which is not at all a bad thing, mind you.

    4. Re:HELL YES I WOULD RECOMMEND IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And eventually, even karsa will witness. And he will be shaken.

  45. An author of intricate detail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The surface comparisons to Jordan are obvious. Both are authors with long histories in the genre before their most famous series; both, currently best known for epic stories set in worlds with a large number of relevant competing factions; both have taken their good, sweet time moving things along in their respective stories. But the stories themselves (so far) evidence a wide gulf in storytelling skill.

    I read nine of the Wheel of Time books, though after book five it was sheer momentum. The Wheel of Time series focuses on characters who are painfully stupid, are incapable of learning the most basic lessons about relating to each other, wouldn't know an insightful observation (whether about human motivation or the nature and methodology of the powers they use on a daily basis) if it slapped them in the face, and are constantly tossed about by deus ex machina. Plot threads are created and dropped willy-nilly, and major events, technical magical knowledge, mysterious relics, and prophecies are developed and then dropped entirely for books at a time (or entirely). This was true from the very beginning of the series (mind you, I recall enjoying the first three books quite a bit), but worsened drastically as Jordan wrote himself into a corner. Jordan's strength was in creating a world with an interesting history and political landscape, and he did that rather well. He was somewhat weaker at telling a coherent story.

    So far, Martin has told a humdinger of a story. His characters have well-developed motivations, and he's not afraid of killing off major (frequently sympathetic) POV characters when other characters, acting consistently, have outsmarted them, been driven past their limits, given a chance to act selfishly far too good too pass up, or otherwise earned a break. The Song of Ice and Fire world is vast and complex - arguably more so than the Wheel of Time world - yet everything has a payoff. I'm obviously looking forward to the book, and when the series starts airing on HBO, it'll be the necessary and sufficient reason for me to newly subscribe.

    1. Re:An author of intricate detail by okooolo · · Score: 1

      I agree that Martin was a better writer then Jordan .. I gave up reading WOT after book #9 (path of daggers), but I disagree that Martin was that much better. Some characters were amazing but some were just boooring. At this point I have a hard time motivating myself to care... I don't really remember what happened in the last book so I'm not sure I'll bother reading dance of dragons.. besides by now the bar is set higher with so many good new writers (Erickson, Lynch,Abercrombie etc) ps. now that Sanderson is finishing WOT I'm actually debating with myself whether I should finish reading the series ... If only I could skip books written by Jordan ...

    2. Re:An author of intricate detail by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Who would you compare Abercrombie to? I haven't read his books, but they always come up.

    3. Re:An author of intricate detail by okooolo · · Score: 1

      I think of his books as shorter more concise versions of martin books: more action, faster pace but not as good world building. I also recommend peter brett and maybe brent weeks ( not as good as abercrombie though). ps. just finished Brandon Sanderson's way of kings and it simply blew me away.. liked it even more then Malazan empire books and that's saying something...

  46. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'd put the odds at 50/50 that this series will ever be completed and I'm starting to think about the same policy in terms of epic series. I'll wait for the second book - if it comes out within 1.5 years of the first, I'll read it. Otherwise I might not - why read something that might not ever be finished?

  47. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by hansamurai · · Score: 1

    And this might be the longest half of a book ever clocking in at 1008 pages!

  48. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The vast and sprawling Malazan Book of the Fallen just had its final volume released this week. Say what you will about Erikson - he gets shit done.

  49. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by turtledawn · · Score: 1

    He's been upstaged, thank you. I'll avoid picking that one up if I find it on the rack before I'm fifty.

    --
    Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  50. Not the conclusion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, The plan is to have 2 more books after this one:

    The Winds of Winter
    A Dream of Spring

    The whole piece is wrong. It's not finished yet, he just set a publication date.

    Please, delete this or edit the news.

  51. Eff Neil Gaiman by beamdriver · · Score: 1

    I'm a paying customer and I have the right to bitch, complain and moan all I want. I spent money, not to mention time and mental energy, on Martin's books and I certainly wouldn't have done so if I didn't feel that there was at least an implicit promise that he would make a reasonable effort to finish the series and not leave me hanging out to dry with a thousand cliffhangers.

    I understand about missing deadlines and writers block and all that. But if you can't write, then at least shut up about it, for Ghu's sake. Don't tease me with updates about writing and the possible finish of the book and then go, "Oh well, didn't finish. Off to Spain for a month".

    It's not like I've been hanging around, doing nothing, waiting for the next book to come out. In the time since Feast Of Crows came out I've managed to get married, have a daughter, buy a house and do a lot of other cool and interesting things. Still, I check in on the GRRM site every couple months and I am happy to bitch about the subject when it comes up in conversation or online.

  52. tv series by Pretzalzz · · Score: 1

    If the HBO series is successful he will be forced to finish the series. He can't very well let the series get ahead of the books. Assuming 1 season = 1 book, I'd say that gives him ~6 years to finish the last two books.

    He was going to announce Dance with Dragons over Christmas, but he was in the hospital for a week or two. Since he seems to have a lot else on his plate[ie tv series premieres in a month] this delayed him more than 2 weeks as he needed to find a new free time in his schedule instead of just pushing everything back. But no reason not to believe that this publishing date is real.

    1. Re:tv series by will_die · · Score: 1

      The December/January announcement was about the upcoming comic not the book.

    2. Re:tv series by Cirak · · Score: 1

      He had another major announcement intended, but he was unable to complete whatever it was that he intended to announce. The general consensus is that he intended to announce the completion of the book.

  53. "...and pull a Jordan." by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    and what? Die? That's a tad insensitive even for Slashdot. I know we are all emotionless robots here but come on...

  54. Ya well by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    While you were writing that comment, Stephen King just finished and published 18 books. So there!

  55. Psychotic by microbox · · Score: 1

    If you are referring to Cersie, I thought it was very believable. She became psychotic -- it's a real thing that happens to people, including leaders (think Gaddafi), and Martin wrote the character very well.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  56. Re:It was to be 7 parts now it's 8 .. the article by Pretzalzz · · Score: 1

    It's more than the second half of Feast of Crows. The first 1/2-2/3[of a 1000 page book] will be concurrent to Feast of Crows, but the rest of the book will be after Feast of Crows[ie stuff always planned to be in book 5]

  57. Pull a What??? by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    How about pull a Harlan? Just how's that The Last Dangerous Visions thing coming anyway?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  58. And the Tolkien estate sues him by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    And the Tolkien estate sues him for writing fantasy and using two Rs as middle initials.

    1. Re:And the Tolkien estate sues him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Tolkien estate sues him for writing fantasy and using two Rs as middle initials.

      Just demand he produce a Birth Certificate. Then he can be President too.

  59. Projected dates of last two volumes by aapold · · Score: 1

    As several have noted, Dances with Dragons is only the 5th of the projected 7 volumes. The last two are still out there.

    I plugged in the values of the publication dates of the series so far into an excel spreadsheet and used the forecast function to predict the final two release dates:

    publication history, tossed it into excel, and then used the forecast function to predict the next two release dates.

    note - this looked a lot better before my tags were stripped out

    # Title Published Days Months Years
    1 A Game of Thrones Aug-96 0 0.00 0.00
    2 A Clash of Kings Nov-98 822 27.40 2.25
    3 A Storm of Swords Aug-00 639 21.30 1.75
    4 A Feast for Crows Oct-05 1887 62.90 5.17
    5 A Dance with Dragons Jul-11 2099 69.97 5.75
    6 The Winds of Winter ? 2668 88.94 7.31 (projected)
    7 A Dream of Spring ? 3169 105.63 8.68 (projected)


    So plugging that in... We can expect Winds of Winter on the 20th of October in 2018.... And a Dream of Spring on the 24th of July 2027.

    --
    "Waste not one watt!" - CZ
  60. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by jackbird · · Score: 1

    I'll see that and raise you The Years of Lyndon Johnson. First volume came out in 1982 and he's not even Vice-president yet.

  61. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Oh, come on, GRRM long ago told us "I'm not your bitch", and that he'd finish writing when he was finished writing.

    And it probably really only had about half the second half done by the time he published the first, since he'd taken the advice to tie off half the main stories rather than adding half as much to all of them.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  62. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by osgeek · · Score: 2

    EXACTLY why I refuse to read Stephen R. Donaldson's latest Thomas Covenant series. That jackass can release the last one before I even crack open the first one. I bugged my local SciFi bookstore for ages when I was in high school, waiting for White Gold Wielder.

    I'm actually thankful to Robert Jordan for making the later books of the WoT series unreadable, thus saving me from caring about how the series would have ended had he written it.

  63. Not the Conclusion and NOT done by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

    The last book is "The Winds of Winter" if I remember correctly. Also it ain't done yet...he indicated yesterday its close, BUT it ain;t done yet...however he and the publisher have announced a street date based on the fact its ALMOST done.

    --
    Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
  64. The story arc's been finished for 500 years by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Sure, he's added Dragons (which always felt to me like they were just tacked on) and random religions and The Others and lots of good characterization, but a lot of it's basically the Wars of the Roses.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:The story arc's been finished for 500 years by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, didn't The Others make an appearance in the epilogue of book 1?

  65. The story just goes on and on... by plazman30 · · Score: 1

    So it was originally supposed to be a 4 volume set. Then he took book 4 and broke it up into two books, making it a 5 volume set. Now, wikipedia shows SEVEN books. Who does this guy think he is, Robert Jordan?

  66. Yup. Lots of swords, not so much sorcery by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Yeah, there are The Others, and the dragons, but it's really mostly about character and conflicts, not about magic or even action.

    Plus if you start the series now, you have the advantage that you won't have forgotten who most of the characters are by now or which ones of them are Not Dead Yet, which is a problem I had when Volume 4 came out a long time after I'd read Volume 3.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  67. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by JabberWokky · · Score: 1

    I see your Gerrold and raise you Tales of the Continuing Time, which I'm still hoping to see completed, dammit.

    --
    "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
  68. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a series I really wish was finished.

  69. dont care... by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    A lot of people will lam-bast him, or defend him... whatever... here's my take on it:

    I started reading his incredibly good books 11 (that's ELEVEN) years ago. They were great books! But waiting 5 years for a Feast for crows? I waited till it came out on paperback, got about half way through it and realized there was no point. I didn't remember any of the characters or the plot, and didn't feel like re-reading 4000+ pages just to catch myself up. Now, 17 years after the series started he finally writes the last book. Good for you George. Maybe my kid can read it when he gets old enough. But as for me and a lot of your audience? You lost us a decade ago. You got too involved in other projects, even politics for gods sake.

    1. Re:dont care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was similar for me, except I only had about 6months - 1 year wait for a Feast for crows. Still gave up half way through because it simply wasn't a good book.

      And this isn't the last book...

    2. Re:dont care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not the last book. It's the 3rd last. There are still 2 more to follow.

    3. Re:dont care... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel the same way. I was very excited about the first couple of books, waited for the third, really didn't like it, and totally expect never to finish the series.

      Now the Patrick Rothfuss novels, on the other hand...I'm not even finished with the second one (came out last week), and I'm already anticipating the third and final novel.

    4. Re:dont care... by neminem · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I once thought I hated the whole epic fantasy genre - no, I just hate it when done badly. Rothfuss is an excellent example of it being done right. Martin... not so much. I made it all the way through A Game of Thrones, but didn't really have any desire to continue; I'm really tempted to buy the second book of the Kingkiller trilogy in hardcover right now, and I hate hardcovers.

      Also, you can tell Rothfuss is awesome just by looking at his picture on wikipedia - he's wearing a "Joss Whedon is my master now" tshirt. Which, apparently he made a promise recently that if he happens to make an absurd amount of money, he will give it all to Fillion to buy back the rights to Firefly with. That decided me: I'm buying the hardcover.

  70. Not the conclusion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "conclusion to the A Song of Ice and Fire series"

    This isn't the last book, he's planning on two more after this (The Winds of Winter and A Dream of Spring).

  71. Re:Yup. Lots of swords, not so much sorcery by Coren22 · · Score: 1

    I'll just reread them myself.

    There is some magic, but it isn't so much of a strong force in the world.

    --
    APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  72. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

    I bugged my local SciFi bookstore for ages when I was in high school, waiting for White Gold Wielder.

    HAH, yes! Me too. The funny thing, is I bought "wounded land" on paperback, so it had already been out a while, and I swear I remember waiting FOREVER for "one tree" and then "white gold wielder" to finish the series. I just looked at the wikipedia and it was actually only 2 years between the first two books, then one for the last one. That's nothing these days.

  73. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Cederic · · Score: 1

    He gets shit done, and he's also a far better writer than Martin.

    I'm not knocking Martin, he's a world ahead of Jordan (frankly the world of literature is a better place without him spewing out more shit books) and I'll happily buy that one when it's released.

    But the Malazan Book of the Fallen is just by far the best 'fantasy' series I've ever read, by quite a margin.

  74. It's appropriate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Pulling a Jordan" is correct.

    It's not that he died, it's that he took what was ANNOUNCED to be a long series, and then decided it was circular rambling time. He has like a 1000 page book, says there will be EIGHT of them, and can't squeeze it in?

    No, he was abusing his readers. He intended to write more and more of them until he died, which, given his age, was inevitable. If he had aimed for the eight he had stated, he would have finished the series correctly long before he passed away.

  75. So it took a long time.....?? by beep54 · · Score: 1

    Be thankful that there is a book coming. Also, have any of you complaining morons ever tried to actually write a long form novel?? Have any of you even tried to freaking EDIT a novel?? Thought not.

    1. Re:So it took a long time.....?? by okooolo · · Score: 1

      no .. because it's not our job.. he's the writer after all nobody is disputing the fact that it's hard... but if you compare him to ANY other writer of that format he comes out looking like an amateur. Look at erickson, sanderson, king .. they manage to write books of comparable size/quality on regular basis... The fact that each book does not have a story arc that stands on its own coupled with the fact that he takes forever is what really pisses me off. If he made his books be good enough to stand on their own merits, have a decent conclusions, maybe we wouldn't mind waiting so much ... That's in my opinion a mark of a great book: being a part of a bigger story but also being a complete story in itself... Anyways, maybe he doesn't owe us anything per se, but I still feel cheated.

  76. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now you're missing out, because the Sanderson books have been amazing.

  77. Later books? by Paul1969 · · Score: 1

    The FIRST one was unreadable. Jordan purely sucked as a writer. And Donaldson is barely tolerable in small doses.

  78. Beware some so-called "completed" series by Paul1969 · · Score: 1

    A classic example is the Gormenghast trilogy by Mervyn Peake. The first 2 books, "Titus Groan" and "Gormenghast," are brilliant, unique and well worth a dedicated reading.
    Unfortunately the 3rd book, "Titus Alone," was only partially complete when Peake died of Parkinson's. His editor fleshed out the roughest parts and published it, but it is vastly inferior to the previous novels.

  79. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

    Really? I don't read GRRM, but I love WoT, and my experience with it certainly wouldn't put me off reading unfinished series. Sure it sucks if you are left hanging for a long time, but that's just another good excuse to re-read the whole thing when that next part comes out. And if you get a permanent cliff-hanger, well, you should still enjoy what you have. "Eating ramen that tastes really bad can be kind of fun, too"

  80. Uh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two things wrong with this story.

    A) he's 62. That's not exactly geriatric yet. Not even retirement age. Hell, he just got married two weeks ago!
    B) According to wikipedia there's two more books in that series.

    So yeah.... not so much

  81. Re:He really had that second half written alright. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same goes for Patrick Rothfuss -- with a 2+ year wait between books, he can bloody well finish the series before I buy another one.

  82. uhh, fifth by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    Game of Thrones Clash of Kings Storm of Swords Feast for Crows Dance With Dragons Interminably Long Wait for Six Posthumous Hackjob for Seven. I CAN'T WAIT

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  83. Well, I'm sure they're hurt by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    You're an asshole. A big "F U"? Ok. As Neil Gaiman once wrote: George R R Martin is not your bitch.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .