Slashdot Mirror


Vatican To Digitize Prohibited Archives

tiltowait writes "Hot on the heels of their successful iPhone app and drive-through confessional, the BBC News reports that the Vatican Voltron Vulture Decepticons has announced plans to digitize their pornography collection and make it available online to tithing paying horny hungry subscribers. Given what the church has planned for the project's by-products offspring profits moneez , here's hoping they learn lessons from the the New York Times paywall loopholes. Is anyone in on the Indulgentia beta?"

121 comments

  1. Gay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  2. April Fools by James+McGuigan · · Score: 1

    Nice try though!

    1. Re:April Fools by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 1

      OMG PONIES!

      Ok, I am leaving the interwebs now. See ya tomorrow.

      --
      blah blah blah
    2. Re:April Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes at 1:30 yesterday bbc released an April fools day 'fake' article describing the release of priceless artifacts that the church felt was, indecent at a time and locked away, and the websites link is real for those who think the whole thing is fake. Sorry pretty sure this isn't an april fools joke

    3. Re:April Fools by the_womble · · Score: 1

      There is an interesting point though. The Vatican does own some porn.

      1) They cannot destroy it because its historically valuable.
      2) They cannot sell it because it would not exactly be appropriate to profit from selling porn.

      Obviously serious scholars need access, which needs to be free (no taking money from porn), so the best solution would be to digitise it and release it for others to redistribute.

    4. Re:April Fools by v1 · · Score: 1

      but If they're only making it available to paying customers, isn't that selling it?

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:April Fools by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Nah, that's selling access to it. It's sort of like "If you pay me $50/hour, I'll let you enter this room at my super-sleazy motel. Also, while in this room, feel free to take advantage of the complimentary prostitute."

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    6. Re:April Fools by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The sad part is, I was just watching a history channel documentary two days ago that claimed the same thing.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    7. Re:April Fools by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      websites link is real for those who think the whole thing is fake. Sorry pretty sure this isn't an april fools joke

      FTFA:"Funding for the collection's digitisation has been procured via an executive order from Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi, who has expressed a strong interest in "protecting our priceless cultural heritage." [...] acount maintenance will be run by adult entertainment magnate Larry Flint."

      Sure, skippy. You keep Believing.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    8. Re:April Fools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love a complimentary prostitute right now, what with my low self-esteem.

    9. Re:April Fools by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

      Yeah, they almost got me on this one.

      --
      There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    10. Re:April Fools by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      complimentary

      1. Expressing a compliment; praising or approving
        • Jennie was very complimentary about Kathy's riding
        • complimentary remarks
      2. Given or supplied free of charge
        • a complimentary bottle of wine
      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  3. Lolwut by twitterfire · · Score: 0

    it's focking 1st of apr.... But I shouldn't comment, maybe Dan Brown reads it and believes it.

  4. boring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Boring

  5. Why today? by skids · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why did I have to get mod points today? Useless.

    1. Re:Why today? by rogueippacket · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +5 Insightful? Methinks you weren't the only one... =)

    2. Re:Why today? by hellkyng · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I vomited my mod points gratuitously all over the place, mmm april fools I feel your pain.

    3. Re:Why today? by webmistressrachel · · Score: 2

      It's worse than that for me. Mine EXPIRE today, and I have 5 of them to waste on this crapflood they call "April Fool's". Oh well, woe is me. Mod me down...

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    4. Re:Why today? by skids · · Score: 1

      Maybe the editors will post a thread on karma-deficiency-disorder, so we can spread the love to the truly pathetic.

    5. Re:Why today? by Nick+Ives · · Score: 1

      Has anyone noticed that mod points seem to come around more frequently lately? I had a run a couple of weeks ago where I received three batches of points in a week!

      --
      Nick
    6. Re:Why today? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Why did I have to get mod points today? Useless.

      You know they last for more than one day, right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  6. Down by vbraga · · Score: 1

    Every year ./ seems to get worse. Even the Aprils Fools joke are getting worse. Unfortunately there's a lack of decent alternatives.

    --
    English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    1. Re:Down by MyLongNickName · · Score: 2

      You should try this new website called /.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Down by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      I just loaded the page for my morning coffee crawl and realized the date. Like previous years, I'm going to ignore the fact that /. exists until the date rolls over. The joke is stale.

      On the flip side, there HAS been interesting April Fools pranks. This micro-editing has some appeal (I can't say why), OMG Ponies, and the time they coordinated with a slew of other geek culture sites to imply that there was some big, bad IP lawyering hitting everyone stand out. But in.... what.... 10 or so years of April Fools jokes to generate such a short list shows exactly how much signal to noise we see on this date. And that ratio should be telling of the value of this tradition.

    3. Re:Down by nschubach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's one day to have fun. Relax.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:Down by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      Yeah you'd think with so many greybeards around here they could come up with better, like their OMG Ponies they had a few years back. So in the interest of furthering the irritation that is April first, allow your old pal Hairyfeet to come up with some suggestions:

      Piss off your users day. Since that is what you do on this day anyway, why not embrace it? make every other link go to something like Badgerbadgerbadger or get on my horse, just to fuck with people. Hell if you are gonna piss them off anyway, do it with style I say.

      Make the admins have horrible flashbacks day. Since there are so many greybeards here, why not make them suffer? I'm sure with a little clever scripting one can bring back the horror of Bonzi Buddy and Comet Cursors to give all of those that survrived the horror a nice Vietnam moment. Add in clippy going "You're making a comment on /. would you like some help?" just to ramp up the pain. bonus points if you can come up with an accurate representation of the infamous "snot clock" pocketwatch fob comet cursor and double Internets if you can make it slow even the baddest multicore to a crawl like what the original did to your baddest P3. Make sure you have the long chain and swing, as that was what REALLY pissed with everyone!

      Is your keyboard broken? This would screw with people trying to make comments by substituting commonly mistyped letters, like say s in place of a and p instead of or next to o, when typing comments. Make it so that the user can correct, only to have the next one of the gotcha letters bite them in the ass again. If you are gonna bring the pain, then bring the pain people!

      So please /. editors (if you actually exist and haven't been replaced by Indian shocky monkeys) take these ideas as a starting off point for next years "festivities". And I'm sure my fellow /. readers can come up with even better ideas, so instead of wasting space on the lame TFA lets see who can come up with the best "gotcha" for next year.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    5. Re:Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, my thoughts exactly. I read this and thought, geez, vbraga isn't going to find this at all funny. Whataripoff.

    6. Re:Down by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      It's one day to have fun. Relax.

      Which is fine if it's fun. It's not.

      Point taken - I probably sound like a killjoy (which I take with a personal sense of irony). This is a day for /. to essentially shut down and I'll treat it as such (with the occasional check to see if this particular thread has garnered any interesting discussion :P).

  7. chosen ones, holycosters; georgia stone edit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not to be confused with a bunch of fools, the costchoosers have mentioned that much of the difficulty was due to an unnoticed, unproven, & unresolvable 'nick' in the head georgia stone, which was misinterpreted throughout fake history, as a decimal point. can you believe it? now we can comfortably survive with all 5 billion of us, instead of the previously maintained .5 billion? even theology evolves?

  8. What happened to OMG Ponies! by viking099 · · Score: 1

    That would have been perfect this year, with the new MLP show. Oh, well.

    1. Re:What happened to OMG Ponies! by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the clips from that show arrange to the audio track from the Dark Knight trailer?

  9. Oh please! by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Funny

    Won't someone PLEASE think of the child... erh...

    better not.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Oh please! by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      In Catholic Vatican, God thinks about children.

    2. Re:Oh please! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Effin' pedo!

      I knew there was something fishy when I read Matt 19:14 and Luke 18:16.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Oh please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually if you read a little more from Matthew, 18:6. Jesus says: "Whoever causes one of these little ones who believe in Me to sin, it would be better for him if a millstone were hung around his neck, and he were drowned in the depth of the sea." Doesn't sound too good for the scumbag pedos does it?

    4. Re:Oh please! by outsider007 · · Score: 1

      It's not a sin to be victimized by a pedophile. He's talking about leading children away from their faith. Which seems odd today because nobody would ever dare tell a kid that there's no God or Jesus. But back then I guess it was a real issue.

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
    5. Re:Oh please! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Hey! The bible thumpers get to pick and choose their quotes from the book and ignore what doesn't further their agenda, so I get to do it, too!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. A fool? Not even close by Things_falling_apart · · Score: 1

    April Fools Day is supposed to be able to trick "fools". This would not fool even the most extreme unthinking Pat Robertson types out there.

  11. Vatican nudity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this also contain the DaVinci portraits of the nude popes?

    1. Re:Vatican nudity by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What for? If I wanted to see dead flesh dangling, I could get plenty thereof in the average crucifixion painting.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  12. Out of ideas by proslack · · Score: 2

    What will Dan Brown write about now?

    --


    Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    1. Re:Out of ideas by guspasho · · Score: 1

      The Vatican's secrets have been intercepted by Wikileaks!

    2. Re:Out of ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He can pick and choose from the Voltron, Vulture and Decepticons. Those are his choices.

  13. It's not actually the BBC by siliconbits · · Score: 2

    Just check the URL I s'ppose... Hope there's no link to Malware in there

    1. Re:It's not actually the BBC by Xugumad · · Score: 2

      This is what got to me. The BBC normally do a rather good joke for April Fool's, but apparently that wasn't enough, now we need fake articles from websites faking being other websites...

    2. Re:It's not actually the BBC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TK421 do you copy? Don't you guys know star wars references when you see one? The domain name is the identifier for the storm trooper Luke got his uniform from in Episode 4.

  14. I'll keep on asking by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

    CmdrTaco let the users submit there own MadLibs .. er stories! We won't inject badly behaving scripts! Please, I'll do my homework and go to bed early.

    --
    Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
  15. April Foolter by blowdog · · Score: 1

    Someone smart, not me I'm an idiot, needs to create a browser plugin that makes April Fool story's disappear

    1. Re:April Foolter by xMrFishx · · Score: 1

      Come back tomorrow and I'll have one for you that will work for years between 2010 and 2012. Unfortunately you'll need to upgrade for next years. I'll probably have it out by the second, or maybe the third of the month.

    2. Re:April Foolter by blowdog · · Score: 1

      great, thanks. hang on, I'll find my credit card and enter the details here.

  16. Come on by RavenousBlack · · Score: 1

    This one's not even believable in the least bit. If you're going to do April Fools at least make me wonder if it's true or not.

  17. See you tomorrow by cultiv8 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Almost forgot, I don't read /. on April 1st.

    --
    sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
  18. P1nk P0ni3s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has got to be right up there with P1nk P0n13s as one of my fav's.

    Your friendly neighborhood AC - Lurking on Slashdot everyday since 1997!

  19. When will this day end? by DigiTechGuy · · Score: 1

    Insanity! The internet is useless, I'm giving up on slacking off and resorting to actually working.

  20. Accomplishments? by vijayiyer · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many people will post today just for the Accomplishment

    1. Re:Accomplishments? by Code+Master · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea!

      --
      The Code Master
    2. Re:Accomplishments? by Qzukk · · Score: 1

      Everyone who didn't get the achievement last time?

      --
      If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
    3. Re:Accomplishments? by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Not sure. :)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    4. Re:Accomplishments? by karnal · · Score: 1

      Accomplishment? OH NO!

      --
      Karnal
    5. Re:Accomplishments? by digitac · · Score: 1

      do they still exist? I thought that was last year's gag.

    6. Re:Accomplishments? by Permutation+Citizen · · Score: 1

      Sure

    7. Re:Accomplishments? by pens · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I wonder that too

    8. Re:Accomplishments? by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      Almost forgot about that.

    9. Re:Accomplishments? by gnarfel · · Score: 1

      [normal slashdot post, for achievement.]

      --
      Local music(to upstate NY). http://gnarfel.com/ radio.
    10. Re:Accomplishments? by Rasit · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I almost forgot about that.

    11. Re:Accomplishments? by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      I got one for using all my mod points today!

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    12. Re:Accomplishments? by n0084ever · · Score: 0

      I haven't posted in so long, not sure I remember how... anyway, what the heck - it IS april fools day after all

    13. Re:Accomplishments? by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      What a foolish accomplishment. /This is not an accomplishment. Nope.

    14. Re:Accomplishments? by acsinc · · Score: 1

      such as myself

    15. Re:Accomplishments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't FEEL accomplished...

    16. Re:Accomplishments? by jcoy42 · · Score: 1

      I suppose I may as well.

      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    17. Re:Accomplishments? by slaxative · · Score: 1

      A lot.

      --
      This is not the penguin you're looking for.
    18. Re:Accomplishments? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get an accomplishment for posting?

    19. Re:Accomplishments? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      I love spam.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    20. Re:Accomplishments? by chargersfan420 · · Score: 1

      And me too.

    21. Re:Accomplishments? by existone · · Score: 1

      And me three.

    22. Re:Accomplishments? by wholesaleidea · · Score: 1
  21. Srsly? by Kwpolska · · Score: 1

    I'd like the original version to be real.

  22. coincides with the coin of the realm retirement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like majic. digitize is wize. now we, & our rulers & maintainers, know how much we have to owe every second, so we needn't have a concerned thought as to whether or not we're living up to our share of the eternal holycost. no card, no bard. it'll take bigger fools than us to be outspent again? unhibited?

  23. Offensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is offensive, tasteless and prejudiced.

    1. Re:Offensive by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought it was pretty cool also.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  24. A report for the Vatican by zildgulf · · Score: 1

    Let's get the "man on the street" report at the Vatican about this shocking news:

    A passer-by said this about Dan Brown, "Poor Dan is in a droop!" about this story
    Another passer-by said about the Pope's fan boys about this news, "Won't lovers revolt now?"
    I heard the Pope's cook said to the doctor, "Doc, note I dissent: a fast never prevents a fatness. I diet on cod.
    The husband of Rowena, the Pope's fashion manager, said "A new order began, a more Roman age bred Rowena."
    A Swiss Guard exclaimed "Draw, O coward!!!" due to a misunderstanding about my IPad.
    The person that leaked this story told me, "Evil did I dwell; lewd I did live", as he was going to confession.
    And a priest told me his secret to resisting temptation, "Lived on Decaf; faced no Devil!"

    And that's the news, goodnight!

  25. Releasing pornography? by plopez · · Score: 1

    I guess they didn't look too close at some of the sculptures and painting the Vatican commissioned over the years.

    Apple breasted Madonnas, naked cherubs, etc.

    I guess the difference between pr0n and art is a few hundred years.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:Releasing pornography? by plopez · · Score: 1

      I meant to say "ample", but apple breasted works well too. Seeing how I am writing this on an Apple machine, it may have been some sort of Freudian slip.....

      *shudders*

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    2. Re:Releasing pornography? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      However, that which is sexually related can sometimes be used with class and artistic merit, sometimes not.

      BTW, I read 'apple' as a description of the female figures' size/shape.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    3. Re:Releasing pornography? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering pornography's etymology, I don't find humor in suggesting that The Vatican is releasing a porn archive -- until I read that Berlusconi was behind this.

    4. Re:Releasing pornography? by plopez · · Score: 1

      yeah, i tried to use "apple" as in apple sized breasts. But who am I kidding? I'm an apple fanboi.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    5. Re:Releasing pornography? by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      that describes quite the level of fanboyism - as powerful as sex. :P

      http://kotaku.com/#!5384643/i-kept-playing--the-costs-of-my-gaming-addiction refers to a sadly extreme example of this.

      P.S.
      What do you think of "However, that which is sexually related can sometimes be used with class and artistic merit, sometimes not.", by the way?

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  26. Timing? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    The timestamp on TFA is March 31. Screwy CMS?

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  27. Holy Vatican Vulture Voltron Decepticons!! by 0-until-pink · · Score: 0

    I was wondering why my Slashdot RSS feed was reading like a grad thesis paper title.

  28. Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by RobotRunAmok · · Score: 1

    I've been here long enough to remember when there were a few clever bits thrown in amongst the snark here on April 1.

    But this... this... vatican porn... WTF? Tasteless AND Tedious, nice job. And a new low.

    Taco, you guys make enough money on this site now, howzaboutmaybe you consider hiring some professional comedy writers once a year to script this site on April 1. Consider it a little give-back.

    As it stands now, you're just driving readers away in hordes...

  29. Lol, Internets by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    I love it. It's like a Vatican Fool's Day Mad Lib!

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  30. Re:Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by danguyf · · Score: 1

    Yeah, this one is really offensive.

  31. Nuclear is safe by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    Ignore TFA -- the radiation levels around the Fukushima plant are nowhere near Chernobyl levels. This is now an effective rebuttal to any slashdot post or comment.

  32. In medieval Rome, the pope proscribes you! by cohomology · · Score: 1

    my apology for propagating a silly meme

    --
    Don't mess with The Phone Company. Piss them off and you'll be using two tin cans and a piece of string.
  33. April Fools!!! by rootrot · · Score: 1

    Seems reasonably funny...

  34. Re:Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Why?

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  35. Fuzzum's law by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Godwin's law applies, unless it's April 1st.
    Then people will state the obvious, thereby losing the discussion, way before Godwin's law can be applied.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  36. Are any of the articles real today? by kyrio · · Score: 1

    Does nothing happen in the news on the first of April?

  37. Re:Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

    They're catholic. It's only funny when it's someone else's religion.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  38. Can we ceep those drop down boxes please? by Evi1M4chine · · Score: 0

    And make the choices the viewpoints of all directions of extreme viewpoints.
    While the default stays the writer’s viewpoint.

    Then let us set our viewpoint in the settings.
    And we call all happily live in our own egocentric world that we live in anyway. ;)

    (Bonus points for making the moderation’s effect relative to the relationship between your viewpoint and that of the moderator. :)

    --
    I must be some kind of leader... Since Slashdot is following me to the grave. ;)
  39. Vulcan To Digitize Prohibited Archives ... by tomhudson · · Score: 1

    There's so much free pr0n on teh Innert00bs that the Vatican's stash won't be any big deal. Most slashdotters probably have copies already.

    The Vulcan prohibited archives, on the other hand ... that could start a whole new TV series - ST:TPA (Star Trek: The Prohibited Archives).

    And the cast wouldn't have to worry about one of the leads ... speaking ... every ... word ... like ... its ... a ... separate ... sentence!

    It could rank right up there with Spaceballs II - The Search for More Money.

  40. Freudian Slip . . . by KenSeymour · · Score: 1

    is when you mean one thing and you say your mother.

    --
    "We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them." -- Albert Einstein
  41. Poor Wittle Petey, Feeling Lonely? by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

    And this coming from poor wittle APK, also know as "Petey, the idiot HOPES file guy"? As in you HOPES that one of the 300,000+ constantly changing array of websites that are infected doesn't happen to be the one you visit today? Or that you HOPES that nobody notices after repeatedly being asked you have FAILED to show even the tiniest shred of mathematical proof that your magical woobie can scale? That you HOPES nobody notices your only "proof" is anecdotes, often by your own sock puppets like Kingsjester?

    If there is ANYONE that should be LOLing it is me, for pointing out there are still morons that believe 16Mb HOPES files can do anything but block ads since ad servers are...what do you call it...oh yeah STATIC, just like your HOPES file, but really you are just kinda pathetic. You're like the idiot that just keeps hanging onto that three years out of date copy of Norton, because he is just so damned sure it still works, only the Norton guy is actually better protected than you are, since it did used to work in the past 5 years.

    So please, keep posting APK, I do so enjoy pointing out the total uber fail of your magical woobie so. I also personally consider it a public service to point people to solutions that actually work instead of relying on magical woobies and anecdotes. And of course bitch slapping your retarded ass around is also quite fun, even if it is too easy!

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  42. Re:Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Well...I was brought up Catholic (not any more!) and would see that as all the more reason to find it funny. The problem is, it's not really funny. Maybe that is why it is really offensive. I am offended by lame humour!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  43. Vatican pornography by wombatmobile · · Score: 2

    I heard they have fantastic statues by old masters of girls with fingers in each other.

    It makes sense. Before TV and the printing press, the only way to create pornography was through artisans.

  44. Heh by Tolkien · · Score: 1

    If this archive really existed it would be the one place that would definitively debunk Christianity as whole and in all its forms. Then of course, millions of people would voluntarily ignore anything that comes of it and life would go on unchanged, with people just as ignorant as before.

  45. Static vs. Dynamic (lol, "according to hairyfeet") by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "oh yeah STATIC, just like your HOPES file, but really you are just kinda pathetic." - by hairyfeet (841228) on Friday April 01, @02:27PM (#35689938)

    Let's have "Pwuffesuh HaiwyPheet" of the PRESTIGIOUS "ITT Tech" tell you ALL his lesson on "static vs. dynamic" address based ad banners (lol, put your mental seatbelts on folks - it's a wild-ride that will have you laughing your asses off):

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35681060

    LMAO!

    ---

    I also don't put my "entire faith" in HOSTS files, so you can cut the lies already - though I *do* consider them to be a VALUABLE part of an arsenal of the MOST effective thing you can do for online security:

    "LAYERED" security!

    So - How can I speak of THAT & as an authority?

    Ok - Well, I'm actually one of the main "sources"/authorities for it, for nearly 15 yrs. now online & unlike YOU? I can prove it!

    To wit/E.G.:

    I also created the 1st guide for securing Windows, highly rated @ NEOWIN (as far back as 1998-2001) here:

    http://www.neowin.net/news/apk-a-to-z-internet-speedup--security-text

    AND, more currently, the MOST viewed & highly rated one there is for years now since 2008 online:

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&go=&form=QBRE

    Which has well over 300,000++ views online (actually MORE, but 1 site with 75,000 views of it went offline/out-of-business) & it's been made either:

    ---

    1.) An Essential Guide
    2.) 5-5 star rated
    3.) A "sticky-pinned" thread
    4.) Most viewed in the category it's in (usually security)
    5.) 2.) Got me PAID by winning a contest @ PCPitStop (quite unexpectedly - I was only posting it for the good of all, & yes, "the Lord works in mysterious ways", it even got me PAID -> http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2007/09/04/pc-pitstop-winners/ (see January 2008))

    ---

    Across 15-20 or so sites I posted it on back in 2008... have YOU done better, troll?

    No, obviously.

    (So much for your attempts @ "discrediting me" with "std. troll disinformation protocol", because it falls apart in the light of FACTS... easily! Just "too, Too, TOO EASILY" in fact!)... apk

  46. Hairyfeet's single solutions FAILURES? See inside by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I also personally consider it a public service to point people to solutions [superantispyware.com] that actually [comodo.com] work [malwarebytes.org] instead of relying on magical woobies and anecdotes" - by hairyfeet (841228) on Friday April 01, @02:27PM (#35689938)

    The effectiveness of those solutions is FAR from perfect & everyone knows it... but, in case they do NOT? See here:

    ---

    MULTIPLE EVIDENCES OF ANTIVIRUS &/or ANTISPYWARE PROGRAM FAILURES + SHORTCOMINGS:

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/12/04/win_2000_virus_tests/

    http://www.securityfocus.com/infocus/1839

    http://it.slashdot.org/it/08/11/07/1545238.shtml

    ---

    From COMPLETELY VALID & RESPECTED SOURCES no less, as is per my usual!

    APK

    P.S.=> No, single solutions (even HOSTS, which I have NEVER ONCE said is "the end all/be all" of security - just a great layered added part vs. known malicious sites &/or servers (botnet C&C ones etc.) for security, and SPEED (blockout adbanners & hardcode your favs for reliability vs. DNS poisoning, DNSBL, & DNS request logs etc.) too + more - it's VERY "versatile", free, & you can get them from reputable sources like this one -> http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

    As to my "know how" & experience in security for a PC (as well as in the real world where I was the manager for a couple years in THAT VERY CAPACITY)? Ok:

    I also created the 1st guide for securing Windows, highly rated @ NEOWIN (as far back as 1998-2001) here:

    http://www.neowin.net/news/apk-a-to-z-internet-speedup--security-text

    AND, more currently, the MOST viewed & highly rated one there is for years now since 2008 online:

    http://www.bing.com/search?q=%22HOW+TO+SECURE+Windows+2000%2FXP%22&go=&form=QBRE

    Which has well over 300,000++ views online (actually MORE, but 1 site with 75,000 views of it went offline/out-of-business) & it's been made either:

    ---

    1.) An Essential Guide
    2.) 5-5 star rated
    3.) A "sticky-pinned" thread
    4.) Most viewed in the category it's in (usually security)
    5.) 2.) Got me PAID by winning a contest @ PCPitStop (quite unexpectedly - I was only posting it for the good of all, & yes, "the Lord works in mysterious ways", it even got me PAID -> http://techtalk.pcpitstop.com/2007/09/04/pc-pitstop-winners/ (see January 2008))

    ---

    Across 15-20 or so sites I posted it on back in 2008... have YOU done better, troll?

    No, obviously.

    (So much for your attempts @ "discrediting me" with "std. troll disinformation protocol", because it falls apart in the light of FACTS... easily! Just "too, Too, TOO EASILY" in fact!)... apk

  47. Your sources vs. mine (AND myself, a source on it) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I do so enjoy pointing [paretologic.com] out [adoko.com] the total [dslreports.com] uber fail [ehow.com] of your magical woobie so" - by hairyfeet (841228) on Friday April 01, @02:27PM (#35689938)

    There's YOUR sources, & then? There's mine (an actual security guru's in the mix, and HE read MY WORK back from the late 90's on it & is RECOMMENDING using them now, in the 21st century for added protection - so does mvps.org, highly respected themselves in this capacity):

    How about Mr. Oliver Day & his article from 2009 called "A Return to the Killfile":

    http://www.securityfocus.com/columnists/491

    ---

    PERTINENT QUOTES/EXCERPTS from SecurityFocus (a division of Symantec):

    "The host file on my day-to-day laptop is now over 16,000 lines long. Accessing the Internet â" particularly browsing the Web â" is actually faster now."

    "From what I have seen in my research, major efforts to share lists of unwanted hosts began gaining serious momentum earlier this decade. The most popular appear to have started as a means to block advertising and as a way to avoid being tracked by sites that use cookies to gather data on the user across Web properties. More recently, projects like Spybot Search and Destroy offer lists of known malicious servers to add a layer of defense against trojans and other forms of malware."

    ---

    (Thus, as you can see - SPEED and LAYERED SECURITY is the gain... it's huge on both, noticeable, & yes - EFFECTIVE!)

    ---

    Folks can read that, & decide for themselves...

    Oh, wait: Many /.'ers have (see below)

    How about all the folks from this site that use them (since we're here):

    PERTINENT QUOTES/EXCERPTS:

    "Ever since I've installed a host file (http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm) to redirect advertisers to my loopback, I haven't had any malware, spyware, or adware issues. I first started using the host file 5 years ago." - by TestedDoughnut (1324447) on Monday December 13, @12:18AM (#34532122)

    "I also use the MVPS ad blocking hosts file." - by Rick17JJ (744063) on Wednesday January 19, @03:04PM (#34931482)

    "I use ad-Block and a hostfile" - by Ol Olsoc (1175323) on Tuesday March 01, @10:11AM (#35346902)

    "^^ One of the many reasons why I like the user-friendliness of the /etc/hosts file." - by lennier1 (264730) on Saturday March 05, @09:26PM (#35393448)

    "I do use Hosts, for a couple fake domains I use." - by icebraining (1313345) on Saturday December 11, @09:34AM (#34523012) Homepage

    "They've been on my HOSTS block for years, ever since one of those annoying GIF popups" - by ScottCooperDotNet (929575) on Thursday August 05 2010, @01:52AM (#33147212)

    "Better than an ad blocker, imo. Hosts file entries: http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm [mvps.org] " - by TempestRose (1187397) on Tuesday March 15, @12:53PM (#35493274)

    Amongst MANY others here, but I think that'll do with myself included to outnumber 9:1 for starters, vs. YOUR "mere opinion" (which is now, for shit, after the post you replied to shows only SOME of your many Sub - BestBuy Techie skillz level, lol!)

    (So... go on, ask ANY of them how or WHY they use HOSTS files (which are free, you have one already, & to fill it there are PLENTY of reputable sources like mvps.org , they DO come here after all!)

    (That again, in addition to the 1,000's using mvps' HOSTS file (highly esteemed & recognized/respected too -> http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm (which is FREE, current, & WORKS!):

    APK

    P.S.=> As to myself being a VALID & highly esteemed source on "things PC-security"? Ok, & for 15 yrs. now no less, to great acclaim:

    I also created the 1st guide for secu

  48. Lastly, as to your LIBEL of myself (w/ arstech) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this coming from poor wittle APK - by hairyfeet (841228) on Friday April 01, @02:27PM (#35689938)

    You came into a thread where I posted pretty much what is in all the other replies I did to you here (blowing away your b.s. easily on every "so-called point" you tried to make & FAIL on)?

    You stalked & trolled me to here:

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35667576

    THERE, right after that, I BLEW AWAY YOUR LIBEL OF MYSELF (along with arstechnica's who have stalked, libelled, & email harassed, & even made death threats to myself (Jay Little) and impersonated me (Jeremy Reimer) only to their OWN dismay - when their ISP/BSP's put them on tracking tickets, stopped their email harassment, & even the law in a Det. Felton of B.C. (where Reimer dwells) stopped that all, cold!)

    In fact, Jeremy Reimer had to PUBLICLY ADMIT he impersonated me on his own personal forums as well. A quote:

    "Anyway the "APK" registered here is just an affectionate clone of the original. In fact I prefer him to the original." - Jeremy Reimer - March 25, 2005

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22OSY%22+and+%22affectionate+clone%22+and+%22Reimer%22&btnG=Search

    He's a "BattleFront" forums mod (or was, and wrote articles for them (spitting back what others already did which he plagiarized (e.g.-> On GUI history, Doug Englebart)))) but, not anymore - that DESTROYED him, badly.

    If HE impersonated me... don't you THINK that the rest of ars did in YOUR "sources" too? Yes, they did.

    ---

    THIS was where I put that ALL to rest:

    http://it.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2061048&cid=35668740

    APK

    P.S.=> Easily... just "too, Too, TOO EASILY" in fact, lol... so much for your libel of myself, hairyfeet... my replies here are cooking your goose, badly, & simply because I use documented, provable facts! apk

  49. Why you cant make jokes about jews? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With all the jokes about Catholics in the media, I ask: Why not more jokes about Jews? Like " Wikileaks reveals Sinagoges satanic rituals"

  50. Like my new sig? by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

    I hope you like it Petey, I did it just for you. Now on EVERY SINGLE POST I make I can not only insult you, I can show everyone how completely batshit you are! its a two for one baby yeah!

    BTW You know it is usually considered good form to at least make a sock puppet, posting AC to plug your own AC posts? Kinda sad. And for the 400th time Correlation != Causation. I can build an XP Sp2 machine with NO patches, NO AV, and change the desktop to a LOLCat. Now if I only use this machine to check my email and go to my bank I will NEVER get a bug, but I don't think it was my magical LOLCat protecting it, do you?

    The simple fact is this: no matter how many times trollie says "1+1 = 3" the math simply proves you wrong and THAT is why all you can do is throw insults. You have 190,000 to 340,000 infected websites at this very moment and that list will change by the thousands per minute as sites are cleaned, new sites are infected, new vulnerabilities found, etc. Now for your HOPES file to actually be a REAL protection and not just a woobie? It will have to dynamically scale and keep up with that ever changing list of infections. Now even if you had twenty fingers and subscribed to every security list on the planet your HOPES file will ALWAYS BE OUT OF DATE and behind the curve. Always.

    Now if you have a mathematical proof that shows how a static .txt file dropped into system 32 can magically scale dynamically? Lets see it. Otherwise it is NOTHING more a magical LOLCat pic backed up by anecdotes. That is the nice thing about math, it doesn't lie or believe in anecdotes.So the ball is in your court Petey, lets see the math. put up or STFU. Oh and I fart in your general direction!

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  51. Achievements by YA_Python_dev · · Score: 1

    I've read somewhere that commenting on an April's fool story gives an achievement.

    --
    There's a hidden treasure in Python 3.x: __prepare__()
    1. Re:Achievements by DeVilla · · Score: 1

      Citation please? Well, ok. So did I, just a second ago, here

  52. Re:Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by danguyf · · Score: 1

    Yeah. It's lame and a total cheap shot.

  53. Re:Formerly Clever. Now Just F*ckin' Tedious by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Hey, I have no problem with a humourous shot at the Vatican, or indeed the seat of any organized religion but when it's not funny...well, best not bother with it. Let's have some funny jokes. But thankfully April 1 is almost at an end and comedic efforts will now be resumed by people who are (supposed to be) better at it - and not on /. We can all breathe a sigh of relief and a good lungful of computer fan exhaust!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  54. Cool - I see you LIKED that one, eh? Nice... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject-line, & awesome... it DOES describe via analogy what the links in my "p.s." below did to you:

    ---

    The defeat of hairyfeet by APK videos:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690536

    ---

    (AND, as-per-usual? Well, you know - It was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2EZ'")...

    APK

    P.S.=> Now, don't forget - There's these too in response to your "so-called points", of which they EASILY 'dismantle' each:

    ---

    Only thing constantly changing's your "math":

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690076

    ---

    Static vs. Dynamic (lol, "according to hairyfeet"):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690188

    ---

    Hairyfeet's single solutions FAILURES? See inside:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690260

    ---

    Your sources vs. mine (AND myself, a source on it):
    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690328

    ---

    Lastly, as to your LIBEL of myself (w/ arstech):

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2064694&cid=35690372

    apk