Slashdot Mirror


Apple Patents Keyboard That Knows What You'll Type

fysdt writes "Another day, another patent, this one from Apple for a very curious sort of keyboard that might be easier to type on because it'll know in advance which keys your fingertips want to hit. No, not a device built by Emmett 'Doc' Brown (as far as we know, anyway), or pulled back through time in a TARDIS—just a very special type of board with tiny inbuilt tactile sensors capable of detecting what your spider-formation fingers are about to tap before they actually do."

132 comments

  1. Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    It detects fingers on keys before you press the key.

    Thats like predicting which way a car will turn at a junction by looking at it's indicator lights.

    1. Re:Errr... by kat_skan · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the nice thing about Apple products though. If they don't do what you wanted, you can safely assume that what you wanted was just wrong.

    2. Re:Errr... by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 3, Funny

      asdfjk;asdjk;lasdfjk;ladsfjk;lSo what happens if you rest your fingers on the keys between typing?asdfjkl;asdfjklasdfjkl;

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    3. Re:Errr... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1, Funny

      >>>If they don't do what you wanted, you can safely assume that what you wanted was just wrong.

      I want 10.6 and 10.7 for my Mac G5.
      "NO." - Steve
      I'm sorry sir. Please forgive me. I'm happy to junk the G5 and upgrade to the current model.

      This "Air Keyboard" reminds of the Atari Chiclet keyboard for some reason: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atari_8-bit_family

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    4. Re:Errr... by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      If processors can have execution prediction, why not keyboards?

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    5. Re:Errr... by jpapon · · Score: 2

      Because there's a human in the loop with keyboards; this is not the case for a processor, except in the very rare case (in terms of the processors time scale) that the user affects what is arriving at the processor. For your analogy to work, a human would have to be inputting each command individually to the processor... and the human would have to correct the processor each time it made a false prediction too.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    6. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is how it will work....

      > I love [Steve Jobs]

      > I want to [give all my money to Apple]

      > I am [a complete retard]

    7. Re:Errr... by dimeglio · · Score: 1

      Although the scale might be different, humans pay in performance when a processor does not predicting correctly. Same goes for the keyboard.

      Also, there's always a human in the loop. Unless you are referring to artificial life forms.

      --
      Views expressed do not necessarily reflect those of the author.
    8. Re:Errr... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry sir. Please forgive me. I'm happy to junk the G5 and upgrade to the current model.

      As the happy owner of a G5, I'm not sure what you are going on about. The thing is at least 5 years old now (mine is going on 7), and they kept selling updated software for it for several years, and they continue to update 10.5 - the last version to run on it. I'd love it if they would support old hardware forever, but let's be realistic. Even Mozilla and Adobe have abandoned G5, which to me is far worse.

      In any case, I'm a counter to you I guess - I am generally quite happy if I can get 7 useful years out of a computer. And I'm not going to "junk" it until it doesn't work anymore. It is actually more useful than when I bought it. I won't be loading Windows 7 on my 2005 Athlon either.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HURF HURF HURF Lets just ignore his entire post, and rant about my mac.

      Please read a little more.

    10. Re:Errr... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      There wasn't much of a post to read. The first part is a commentary on not being able to run the latest and greatest on older hardware. I directly addressed this point. The second part is talking about a keyboard comparison, and I didn't address that.

      Are you sure YOU read the posts?

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    11. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clever. Except somehow I get the feeling you made this assumption without reading what this is actually used for.

    12. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, because Windows 7 on an 8 year old PC is totally plausible.

      </sarcasm>

    13. Re:Errr... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "It detects fingers on keys before you press the key."

      Both my fingers?

    14. Re:Errr... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't be loading Windows 7 on my 2005 Athlon either.

      Funny, I installed Win7 on my 2004 Athlon and it ran remarkably well. I only went back to XP because the new DirectX version couldn't properly draw the colors in C&C & C&C Red Alert. I kinda like my old games to be able to run without problems on my old machine.

    15. Re:Errr... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      I know you CAN install it... but why? The license costs more than the junk you are installing it on :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    16. Re:Errr... by ikeman32 · · Score: 1

      Thats like predicting which way a car will turn at a junction by looking at it's indicator lights.

      That can only end badly, one should never assume that just because someone has their turn signal on that they will actually tune. That would be like assuming that a politician actually has your best interests at heart, and is not actually a low-life back stabbing POS that will say anything to get your vote.

  2. Judging by the... by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 2

    epically inept word suggestions from my T9 phone, this will produce some awesomely funny posts.

    --
    I got here through a series of tubes
    1. Re:Judging by the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    2. Re:Judging by the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can imagine the most oft-prompted phrase will be "i think the rev jobs is god and i'm going to give him all my money"

    3. Re:Judging by the... by robthebloke · · Score: 1

      More like "I don't remember typing in my credit card details to buy apps from the app store?"

    4. Re:Judging by the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even T9 wasn't as bad as those.

    5. Re:Judging by the... by dwillden · · Score: 2

      Hmm maybe I'll run out and reserve damnyoupsychickeyboard.com

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
  3. Great! by DWMorse · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hop it work breaded than predictive testing.
    __
    Sent from my iPhone

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:Great! by kehren77 · · Score: 1

      I seem to be the only person who doesn't have this problem with the iPhone. Rarely does the predictive typing feature mess up a word for me and when it does, it's because the word I'm entering isn't really a word (proper name, tech jargon, etc...).

      I wish the Mail app in OS X had predictive typing.

    2. Re:Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's because you have nothing original to say.

    3. Re:Great! by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      Seems perfectly cromulent to me.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
  4. Truefax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The poster bought one of these and I took it upon myself to go back in time and post this for him before he thought to type it.

    You're welcome.

  5. It will be called by indecks · · Score: 1

    "The Red Ball" because it can predict murders.

  6. Creepy by SolemnDwarf · · Score: 1

    Would you ever have to take your fingers off home row?

    I tried pretending my work keyboard would do this. Just made minute movements with my fingers. It actually made me nauseous. Weird...

  7. Touch typing? by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that resting your fingers on the home row would be equivalent to mashing down on the keyboard?

  8. Already done: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://www.theonion.com/video/apple-introduces-revolutionary-new-laptop-with-no,14299/

  9. You can have my mechanical, long stroke keyboard.. by khraz · · Score: 1

    ... when you pry it from my cold, dead hands.

  10. I prefer me knowing what I typed by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    I prefer me knowing what I typed. Which is why I use a Man's keyboard An IBM type M. I might not always type, but when I do it is on a Model M.

    1. Re:I prefer me knowing what I typed by cosm · · Score: 1

      I prefer me knowing what I typed. Which is why I use a Man's keyboard An IBM type M. I might not always type, but when I do it is on a Model M.

      You roll without a display device too? Damn! I at least like to see my monkey-phalanges attempting a Shakespeare.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    2. Re:I prefer me knowing what I typed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now we have it from the least interesting man in the world.

    3. Re:I prefer me knowing what I typed by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I often type while looking at something else. I typed this whole comment while talking to someone in my office.

  11. Put the earbuds back in by EraserMouseMan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And so you're going to tell us that this will revolutionize everything now, right? And what a visionary Steve Jobs is? And how Apple is the only company capable of being innovative these days? And the stock price... Got it. Thanks.

    1. Re:Put the earbuds back in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur, after all, my wireless Logitech keyboard lights up the keys when it senses movement over the them.

  12. Are we sure this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cause if http://damnyouautocorrect.com/ is any indication....

  13. So... by TimeElf1 · · Score: 1

    Instead of Damn You Autocorrect, we will have a new site called Damn You Precognitive Keyboard!

    --
    Cannot find REALITY.SYS. Universe halted.
    1. Re:So... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Instead of Damn You Autocorrect, we will have a new site called Damn You Precognitive Keyboard!

      No, it would be called the "You will be Damned" precognitive keyboard.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. Hello, computer. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    Scotty: Hello, computer.
    Dr. Nichols: Just use the keyboard.
    Scotty: Keyboard. How quaint.

  15. In other words by Chrisq · · Score: 1
    In other words

    Apple to fanbois: "we know what yo want to do with your fingers"

    1. Re:In other words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Touch epeen. Nuff said.

    2. Re:In other words by bughunter · · Score: 1

      If they really knew, then they'd make an input device that resembled a pair of breasteses.

      --
      I can see the fnords!
  16. How about predicting mistakes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What good is a keyboard that knows what typos I am going to make, but does nothing about ti?

  17. What's the point? by hawguy · · Score: 2

    I don't see how a little blast of air is going to help me type -- and having the key move by itself when I press it seems like it would remove the tactile feel that lets me know that I pressed it -- if I wanted an on-screen keyboard with no tactile feel, I'd use one. I use a real keyboard because my fingers like to know when they press a key.

    Unless key prediction gets *much* better than what I've seen on my phone, it seems that I'd quickly learn to ignore any hints given by the keyboard since more times than not, it would be wrong.

    1. Re:What's the point? by sammyF70 · · Score: 1

      You might be on to something with that : "This iPhone virtual keyboard provides EXACTLY the same experience and amount of tactile feedback as the iThink4U Precog Keyboard!" .. I wish I were joking.

      --
      "DRM is like the Ford Pinto: it's a smooth ride, right up the point at which it explodes and ruins your day."-C.Doctorow
    2. Re:What's the point? by Altus · · Score: 2

      Of course mechanical feedback is nice, but the idea here, I suspect, is to be able to have tactile feedback that is as effective as mechanical feedback but in a package that is far far smaller. the thinner keyboards get the less mechanical feedback you get from them and the smaller devices get the smaller their keyboard have to be. This isn't to make keyboards better... its to make them smaller without making them suck more. Theoretically this might give good tactile feedback on keyboard that is simply a flat surface with no moving parts, just touch sensors.

      Also, the predictive stuff isn't based on what you typed last but based on sensors detecting your fingers heading toward a key, so it should work very reliably.

      I'm not sure if this would work well enough or not, but I would be curious to try it.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re:What's the point? by dwillden · · Score: 1

      Unless you've had too much caffeine that morning. They the shaking of your over caffeinated hands may cause issues with accuracy. It'll pick the right key bbbbbuuuuttttt hhhhhiiiiitttt every letter multiple times.

      --
      I'm too lazy to compose a creative sig.
    4. Re:What's the point? by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      Unless key prediction gets *much* better than what I've seen on my phone, it seems that I'd quickly learn to ignore any hints given by the keyboard since more times than not, it would be wrong.

      I shared your opinion until recently, so I was surprised to see how much better prediction has gotten with alternative keyboards on my Android device. SwiftKey is all about prediction, and it learns quite quickly. It has a decent training set right out of the box, but a week later it's night & day.

      Swype isn't as sophisticated as SwiftKey with next-word prediction, but the idea of tracing in lieu of keystrokes is great. The first beta was almost unusable, but after trying beta 2, I switched and I'll probably never go back to key-tapping.

      I think smarter keyboards will be a short-lived phase though; voice recognition is really coming of age the past few years, and when it works it's far more efficient than even the most accurate predictive keyboard. (Well, unless it predicts your whole next paragraph, I guess...)

    5. Re:What's the point? by danlock4 · · Score: 1

      It seems more to me (from having read the summary) like this would benefit the typing speed of hunt-and-peck typists and detract from the typing speed--slow down--touch-typists. *shrug*

      I wonder if it could be a way to improve keyboarding skills for programmers, etc., by using macros more efficiently? Hmm...

      I think I'll go change my .sig to "Why do I always add a slightly-OT sentence to the end of my posts?" (to increase insightfulness? informative status? or maybe it's just the way my brain fails)

      --
      To .sig or not to .sig, that is the question.
    6. Re:What's the point? by matfud · · Score: 1

      Perhaps for use at home voice recognition would work. but in an office? Loads of people talking at their computers? A very noisy environment. Are you sure that is a good idea?

    7. Re:What's the point? by RareButSeriousSideEf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's definitely better for private atmospheres. Although in *my* office it's not a problem; I work for a startup with a one-big-room office, and everyone wears headphones all day anyway.

  18. Complexity, failure, etc... by alispguru · · Score: 2

    Keyboards are electromechanical nightmares anyway, so there would have to be a BIG advantage to anything that made them more mechanically complex.

    Consider that the failure modes on this would make individual keys have different sensitivity when typing.

    Bleah. Count me out until they've had a few years in harsh environments.

    BTW, here is another link to a similar story - the submission seems slashdotted as I type this.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
    1. Re:Complexity, failure, etc... by rich3rd · · Score: 1

      On the upside, maybe the compressed air will keep crumbs and other foreign matter out from underneath the keys, thus helping to prevent one of the most common modes of failure with existing keyboard technology.

    2. Re:Complexity, failure, etc... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I'm envisioning getting a crumb shot up my nose every time I try to type a letter. I'm not sure that's a feature I want.

  19. How is this different by esocid · · Score: 1

    from any other predictive keyboard out there?

    A: It has an apple on it.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
  20. no data in TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I want to know whether this can improve my typing speed. If I can do 110 wpm now, does this help?

    Or is it another one of those things that helps the least proficient while hurting those who can already do it well?

    Either way TFA provided no useful data *at all*.

  21. You won't be allowed to type "smut" by Old97 · · Score: 1

    And your text will be reviewed to determine its worthiness. Also, Apple keeps 30% of your words.

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
  22. Autocorrect by bradgoodman · · Score: 2

    Oh, come ON! The last thing we need is my work PC doing the same kind of auto-correct nonsense that my iPhone does! You really need it on an iPhone where typing is cumbersome, however, I believe this would slow you DOWN on a PC. The reason is, typing becomes quick, intuitive and "muscle-memory" driven. To have to react to the computer (or keyboard) doing things for you as you are in the middle of typing a word would completely - not just slow you down - sort of throw a stumbling block in front of you. Granted, you could ignore it, or deal with it after the word is done - however, this wouldn't be any better than turning it off - or doing what spell-correction does today.

    1. Re:Autocorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, come ON! The last thing we need is my work PC doing the same kind of auto-correct nonsense that my iPhone does! You really need it on an iPhone where typing is cumbersome, however, I believe this would slow you DOWN on a PC. The reason is, typing becomes quick, intuitive and "muscle-memory" driven. To have to react to the computer (or keyboard) doing things for you as you are in the middle of typing a word would completely - not just slow you down - sort of throw a stumbling block in front of you. Granted, you could ignore it, or deal with it after the word is done - however, this wouldn't be any better than turning it off - or doing what spell-correction does today.

      Whoever said this would be on a full-size PC (or mac?)

    2. Re:Autocorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a company called brown bag software had a shareware word processor (forget the name) 20+ years ago, which had an auto-complete function that was really pretty cool AND especially useful in fields where there were many long words, specialized jargon, etc... you could even add whole phrases to the recognition dictionary...
      even though i didn't have to do much word processor tasks, i played with it, and could see how it would really simplify the typing of long, foreign, or scientific words and phrases...
      as i recall, as you typed, a little popup would appear near your word with various potential word choices, which would be shuffled as your further characters narrowed the field... i think you would hit 'enter' mid-word to select the auto-completed word... of course, with your own dictionary, you could pre-select if certain words were popped up as the first choice...
      it was cool, i liked it, and was surprised it did not catch on more...

    3. Re:Autocorrect by Xyde · · Score: 1

      This feature actually exists already in Lion and i believe it has corrected more mistakes than mistaken my corrects. You can selectively enable/disable it for any text field anyway so its optional...

  23. Viral funny site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Register your new domain: damnyouautocorrectingkeyboard.com

  24. Questionable idea... by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    I fail to see how where you fingers hover could have any correlation to what you might be about to type. If you're in a proper position for typing your fingers are always going to be resting on a set range of keys. Also, people routinely type too quickly for this to be effective.

    I suppose the people at Apple might have simply been brainstorming and just patent any idea that shows the vaguest hint of potential.

    What surprises me is that predictive text hasn't been coupled with full-size keyboards. I imagine it would work a lot like how input for a lot of Asian languages works. There's an app I've been using for some time on my Android phone called SwiftKey which I think is impressive. The suggestions are driven by a log the app builds of what you've typed. It's not perfect, but occasionally I can complete a sentence without typing a single word, by just going through the suggestions. When I first saw that headline this is the sort of thing I thought Apple got a patent on.

  25. Not a fan of that writer by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    This part threw me off: 'The second method involves a pneumatic (that would be "air-related") system' So they expect people who can understand the diagram and are willing to read up on a recently patented device to not know what "pneumatic" means. I'd be very interested to know what their target audience is.

  26. Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III... by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Quoting the immortal words of Montgomery "Scotty" Scott: "The more they overthink the plumbing, the easier it is to stop up the drain."
    A keyboard should be just that, a keyboard. All other stuff in this patent is just overthinking the plumbing.

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  27. But? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good going Apple! SO now your keyboard will be all "You were gonna press 'X' so I put an 'X' on the screen"

    And I'll be all "Oh there's an 'X' there. Now I don't have to press it!"

    And the universe will implode

    I HOPE YOU'RE HAPPY

  28. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...a keyboard that blows?

  29. Actually, Doctor Who did use a Mac keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Silence in the Library set many years in the future.

  30. Wouldn't this method... by hellwig · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't this method require everyone to be a practiced touch-typist? I mean, in order for the keyboard to predict where your fingers are going, wouldn't YOU have to know where your fingers are going? Too many people these days hunt and peck. Obviously there are people who scrape the letters off their Dvorak Simplified keyboards just to screw with others, but I imagine people interested in Apple products might not be so disciplined. Especially if those same people have gotten used to typing on an iPhone or iPad.

    --
    Eggs
    Milk
    Bread
    Cat Litter
    Soda
    ...
    1. Re:Wouldn't this method... by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Obviously there are people who scrape the letters off their Dvorak Simplified keyboards just to screw with others.

      Actually, I just set the OS keyboard layout to Dvorak and type on it without looking at the keys...

      Additionally, I do own a keyboard with no key-cap markings, but I purchased it this way...

      I find that people are more confused if the key they press has a differently labeled key than the character it generates than if the keyboard has no key-cap markings at all.

      (Most keyboards have keys that can be popped off and re-arranged to your preferred layout, but some keyboards mount the F and J keys differently, or have a different key shape for each row...)

      Dvorak keyboards that can be used without selecting the OS keyboard preference are expensive because they have to translate the scancodes themselves. You know what I'd be exited about? US Smart phone manufacturers allowing me to select or modify the on-screen keyboard layout... Even the Apple II supported Dvorak, (in fact, OSX supports both single hand layouts (optimized for left or right only). ) oh that's right Steve, I forgot, I didn't want to use any other key layout on the iPad than the one I don't use...

  31. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

    Realistically, it'll never make it into a product. All they're doing, then, is patenting new ways to make drains that stop up. This is good for society, since no one will ever design such a drain, much less try to sell it, if Apple's already patented it. Think of the patent system as a giant mop, in this case.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
  32. Apple Patents Keyboard That Uses Tactile Air by digitaldc · · Score: 1

    But it doesn't know what you are going to type in advance, just when your finger tips are close to the keys you want to physically depress. It then sends back air pressure as a tactile response. There, did that sound as confusing as the original post?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  33. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yep, the keyboards we have now are perfect, and there's no reason to incrementally improve them. Why, when it comes time to use something better, it'll be okay that it's completely different because we'll all just jump to that en-masse. I mean, what, is some totally new input system going to have unforeseen consequences? Hah! That'll be the day!

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  34. ugh by nomadic · · Score: 1

    Great, but it will probably predict it will probably be programmed to predict what the typical Apple user will type: "Let's hit up The Levee for PBRs" "OMG that guy totally almost hit my Vespa" "Dude we should hit up that Animal Collective show next Saturday" "Dad, I really need that $2000 for rent as soon as possible" "Of course I have a career, I'm an unpaid intern at an indie music label"

  35. Time to register a domain by Combatso · · Score: 1

    damnyouautokeyboard.com

  36. Re:You can have my mechanical, long stroke keyboar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Apple, remember. They're trying to deprecate your hands entirely, as they're not elegant and stylish enough and have too many points of contact. I'm certain a Genius will be happy to liberate your inferior hands as well as the keyboard they are clutching, from your arms and replace them with iStubs. They might even get them in white next year!

  37. As it turns out .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This keyboard cannot write the words "PC", "windows" or Linux....

  38. isn't this already being used everywhere by josepha48 · · Score: 1

    This kind of thing has been out there since, well for years now in desktop apps. So why the patent now, isn't it obvious, or are they going to try and go after google/android and all the other web sites and applications that use this feature.

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!

    1. Re:isn't this already being used everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone and everyone would patent the kitchen sink if the thought they could get away with it, where have you been the last 10+ years?

    2. Re:isn't this already being used everywhere by Altus · · Score: 1

      No. No it is not. In fact, I can safely say that I have never seen a keyborad that does what this article describes and I suspect you haven't either.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

  39. Now if that keyboard attain self awareness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now if that keyboard attain self awareness, it would start up the notepad (well, OSX equivalent anyways) and key in "you're jerking me around. stop it, you jerk."

    1. Re:Now if that keyboard attain self awareness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (well, OSX equivalent anyways)

      TextEdit.

    2. Re:Now if that keyboard attain self awareness... by cp.tar · · Score: 1

      TextEdit is actually a WordPad equivalent. There is no program as moronic as Notepad in OS X.
      Or anywhere else.

      --
      Ignore this signature. By order.
    3. Re:Now if that keyboard attain self awareness... by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I don't use Windows. Does that mean it's closer to Stickies?

      If not, what's so moronic about Notepad?

  40. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by gnick · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's like the old "build-a-better-mouse-trap" analogy. Sure, you can make it re-usable. You can make it more humane. You can make it with blinkin-lights. But, all we want is something cheap that we can throw peanut butter on, kills the mouse, and we can throw away w/o getting our hands dirty. About the only improvements for keyboards are making the keys softer/quieter, more comfortable, or rearranging them. Does my chair need to react when my bum's about to land?

    --
    He's getting rather old, but he's a good mouse.
  41. Like MS software knows what I want to do next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    APPL getting more and more like MS everyday

  42. AAPPLLEE KKEEYYBBOOAARRDD by tekrat · · Score: 1

    II''mm uussiinngg iitt nnooww..

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
    1. Re:AAPPLLEE KKEEYYBBOOAARRDD by XiaoMing · · Score: 1

      Slw Fngrs I Se?

  43. Nethack, No! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OMG I meant 'j', not 'k'!

  44. Honestly, Professor by NEDHead · · Score: 1

    I was trying to write a brilliantly thoughtful and original paper, but my keyboard wouldn't let me....

  45. A better solution would be for us to move to... by QilessQi · · Score: 1

    ...the Decabet: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cRtyBBiyYhI . 10 characters = fewer keys = fewer keystroke errors.

    Actually we could make it simpler and enter things in binary, so we'd only need two keys: 0 and 1.

    Or maybe cycle through a conventional alphabet with two keys: "Next Character" and "Yeah, That One"....

  46. So last year. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

    I just patented a keyboard that types what you mean.

  47. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Does my chair need to react when my bum's about to land?

    I imagine that would depend on the size of you and your ass... :-)

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  48. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Stormwatch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We don't need a newer, better kind of keyboard. We need an older, better kind of keyboard!

  49. Mod parent up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He actually RTFA!

  50. Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek IV... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Quoting the immortal words of Montgomery "Scotty" Scott:

    "Keyboard... how quaint."

  51. Judging by my last 5 "Reply to All" emails.... by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    What I WANT to type, and what I SHOULD type, are two radically different things.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  52. What's even the point? by gman003 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, what is the point of this? You don't WANT software responding to what it thinks you're going to do, you want it responding to what you actually do. I (and many others, I'm sure) tend to rest their fingers on the keys when not actively typing - if the keyboard were to detect that as input typing would become impossible.

    And don't even think about applying it to gaming. First, there's the fact that if it mis-guesses, you're screwed on any sort of twitch shooter, platformer or fighting game. Second, if it DOES work properly, you've increased the already-massive gap between PC gamers and console gamers (multiplayer interplay between PC and consoles is extremely rare in no small part because gaming on a mouse/keyboard is so superior to using a gamepad - even with the console players having autoaim, it's still completely unfair).

  53. If it's anything like the iPhone ... by wsanders · · Score: 1

    This'll feet your be somehow use fill. It actuarily pickaxe the current word mast of the tines.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  54. What Apple Didn't Say... by penguin_dance · · Score: 0

    What Apple didn't say is it saves all those future keystrokes in a hidden database that syncs up with your iPhone.

    --
    If you've never been modded as "flamebait" or "troll," you've never tried to argue a minority viewpoint here!
  55. Re: by maucer · · Score: 1

    All I know is that I want one. Especially if it has 3G

  56. That would work ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what would the keyboard guess about me trying to type this:

    for (int i = 0; i cellCount; i++)
                                    {
                                            ListViewNF lv = new ListViewNF();
                                            lv.Font = new System.Drawing.Font("Microsoft Sans Serif", 7F, System.Drawing.FontStyle.Regular, System.Drawing.GraphicsUnit.Point, ((byte)(0))); .............

  57. I'm patenting myself! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know exactly what I'm going to type ... most of the time.

  58. Patent: X with Y by Tei · · Score: 1

    New patent.
    "detecting position of hands" with "hands"

    I propose something.

    If a patent can be described in a single phrase, It is automatically canceled.

    If a patent can be described in a single phrase, It is automatically canceled with the form X with Y. And CEO of the company is jailed 30 days.

    --

    -Woof woof woof!

  59. Great idea! by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    just a very special type of board with tiny inbuilt tactile sensors capable of detecting what your spider-formation fingers are about to tap before they actually do

    Because what could possibly be annoying about hardware-level autocompletion!

    --
    /* No Comment */
  60. Keylogger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So... it's a steam punk keylogger. Great.

  61. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason to keep innovating. There is no "something better". Input systems are made to create a relationship between the end user and the interface as close to 1:1 as possible. Are keyboards a perfect answer to input? For many users, yes. For others, maybe not. This isn't a step in the right direction. People who use keyboards as a preferred input device probably use them as efficiently as possible already. This is just a $150 branded price tag on a $20 input device.

    Also, if there's an input device that is "completely different": NO ONE WILL USE IT EN MASS. It isn't forced. These are products. The company will tank and the input device that is intuitive out of the box will win.

  62. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    About the only improvements for keyboards are making the keys softer/quieter...

    Talk about your misfeatures...

  63. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    We don't need a newer, better kind of keyboard. We need an older, better kind of keyboard!

    I've never understood the appeal of the Model M. Sure it's loud and clacky, but that seems to be a negative more than a positive.

    After all, if you're in a cube farm, someone typing rapdily would sound like machinegun fire, making an already miserable work environment even worse.

    And at home, well, using them at night discreetly is just as hard. Good perhaps for parents of kids to put on the kid's PC (and the shared one) so they can be alerted to stray typing, but still. Typing at night on a clacky keyboard slowed me down as I tried to type without waking everyone else up...

  64. keyboard on my nokia e71 by ideaz · · Score: 1

    already does that :D

  65. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who use keyboards as a preferred input device probably use them as efficiently as possible

    Thank goodness you were here with your science, now we won't waste any time with new ideas doomed to failure.

  66. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by RadiantPhoenix · · Score: 1

    It looks like the big thing going for the model M is durability.

  67. Predictive Computer Input by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it really knew what I was going to type before I typed it, why even have a keyboard? My current home project is developing the TeaLeaf1000(TM) computer based upon the ESP42 processor. It won't come with a keyboard or mouse as it'll know what you want; just a monitor and printer so you can see the results. I've been working on this for years - as soon as I get the kinks worked out you'll be able to buy one. These things should sell like hot cakes, I'll make a fortune!
    On second thought, once I get the prototype working I won't need to sell any computers to make a fortune. I'll just buy lottery tickets and stocks based on the computer output.

  68. Prior art by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Apple keyboards already have this predictive typing. It would explain the Apple "fan" sites and compliments Apple gets on its products.To start my explanation, i want to say I'm on a Windows PC with non-mac keyboard so its pure WITIWIG (What i type is what i get).

    You see, when an Apple user really wants to write:
    "Apple sucks so much that I want to give Steve Jobs the finger, he sucks, all Apple products suck. ROT IN HELL APPLE!!!!!"

    What actually shows up on the screen is:
    "Apple is super so much that I want to give Steve Jobs my hand for marriage. He's super, all Apple users are super. All is swell with my Apple products! "

    Because of the predictive typing keyboard, all Apple fanboy websites are created on a Mac. Without exception - they can't type the truth. That's why all these web sites are basically PR machines. If you try and get smart and use a different keyboard on your Mac, OS X has software to handle predictive typing too. The real, true and honest Apple feedback comes from users that are using something other than a Mac.

  69. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Stormwatch · · Score: 2

    That, and the tactile/auditory feedback. When you've pressed a key, you KNOW you've pressed a key.

  70. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately there's no Model M with an ergonomic configuration. I like the Model M's tactile response, but I just wish someone made one combining the Model M's tactile system with the split-key configuration. Any geeks here know of one and can point me in that direction?

    I recently ditched my Model M in favor of the Microsoft Natural Ergonomic keyboard. Yes, I know it's M$, but I really can't live without the splitkey configuration. My wrist pain went away when I switched.

    If only there was a keyboard that combined the best of both worlds.

  71. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by bughunter · · Score: 2

    I've never understood the appeal of the Model M.

    Then you've never used one to perform many kilocharacters of data entry by touch typing... The keys' springiness and tactile feed back makes it a superior high-volume input for a speed typist.

    And there is also the nostalgia, granted. But there really has been no other keyboard tech that provides the same clear, unmistakeable confirmation that yes, your key was pressed.

    --
    I can see the fnords!
  72. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by LeonPierre · · Score: 3, Interesting
    --
    "If it ain't broke, it doesn't have enough features yet"
  73. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by Skywolfblue · · Score: 0

    That's a good thing? I don't know how people don't go insane using those noisy things. Every time I've had to use one I get an irresistible urge to throw it on the floor and stomp on it.

  74. It doesn't HAVE to work.. by Billlagr · · Score: 1

    It doesn't have to even make it to production. Its just another patent in Apples portfolio, for future exploitation and/or patent trolling and lawsuits.

  75. No, you cannot have it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Part No. 1391409
    Id No 1670863
    Date: 18AUG1989

    In continuous use since 1993
    Great condition, all keys, all letters clear and unworn (some tiny greying edges on some)
    small mod: drainage holes carefully drilled in casing (it's one fault)

    Never killed anyone with it, but good to know I could.

  76. Slashdot Edition: by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Hot grits, first post, goatse, in Soviet Russia, Linux runs you, all in 4 keystrokes!

  77. just make it by milkmage · · Score: 1

    mechanical.. I'll buy one in a second if they use cherry switches.

  78. space-saver? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since keyboard technology is in dire need of new advances, it's smart for Apple to patent such developments. However, ultimately it seems to me that it would make much more sense to ultimately incorporate keyboards into monitors; this would be a convenient space-saver.

  79. Closest thing to the Model M for a Mac... by superposed · · Score: 1

    I have a Compact Cherry Mechanical Switch Mac Keyboard (SMK-88). It has buckling springs with the same "sound and feel" as the old IBM keyboards (which were indeed my favorite for a long time). The narrow layout (without numeric keypad) allows you to put your mousepad or pen tablet more directly in front of you, reducing RSI. It's also good for fitting all the input devices into a narrow kneewell below and old-fashioned desk.

    I was pretty happy with the Cherry keyboard for a year or two, but the loud clicks did put me on edge a bit during long typing sessions. When Apple came out with their narrow bluetooth keyboard, I switched to that and haven't looked back.

  80. Re:Quoting the immortal words from Star Trek III.. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

    You can accomplish some of that through training. I hate external keyboards on laptops (just a personal preference - I prefer having the same environment wherever I am) but I have some wrist pain with traditional typing. I simply hold my hands at about a 30-35 degree angle, elbows out a bit, with a little rotation so that my thumbs are slightly higher than my pinkies.. My "home row", if you want to call it that, would be ... checking ... "qsdfjkl;" - pretty normal. It took a bit of retraining but I now touch-type just fine, on any random keyboard, with no issues. It might help that I have long fingers. On my MacBook, F6 is the only key that I actually have to move my wrists to reach.

    An ideal ergonomic keyboard that maintained the current layout would be folded in half, with half the keys facing left and half facing right, on a triangular stand (blank face towards the typist. That just doesn't seem to be happening, so I'll stick with a reasonably versatile re-learning.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!