Slashdot Mirror


Computer Records Hold Key In IMF Head's Sexual Assault Case

Hugh Pickens writes "ABA Journal reports that the chief of the International Monetary Fund may claim consent as a defense to accusations that he sexually assaulted a maid at the Sofitel Hotel in New York as defense lawyer Benjamin Brafman told the judge he believed the 'forensic evidence' was 'not consistent with forcible encounter.' Police have said the maid knocked on Strauss-Kahn's door and called out, used her master keycard to open the door, and left her work cart in the doorway, a typical safety practice in hotels. According to the police account, Strauss-Kahn emerged naked, tried to attack the maid, and then shut the hotel door when she tried to escape. The NY Times explains how the key card evidence may play out: 'If the defense for Mr. Strauss-Kahn maintains that the encounter was consensual, its version will have to accommodate the unambiguous computer record of her leaving the door propped open,' the story says."

252 comments

  1. Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since when does opening a door equate to consent?

    1. Re:Huh by RL78 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is about reconciling their stories. Evidence of lying is a good place to start.

    2. Re:Huh by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      I love it when technological forensics like this helps to clear matters up.

    3. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends what you mean by "door".

    4. Re:Huh by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      If I were the lead investigator, the first thing I would do is ask both parties to take a lie detector exam. And I *WOULD NOT* allow the FBI or any other federal agency to administer it.

      This whole thing smells fishy as hell to me. First Julian Assnage, now this guy. It seems that a lot of people these days are deciding to become rapists right after they cross the U.S.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Huh by Golddess · · Score: 2

      Perhaps I'm missing something, but the way I'm reading it, there are 2 possible scenarios.

      1) Straight from TFS, "According to the police account, Strauss-Kahn emerged naked, tried to attack the maid, and then shut the hotel door when she tried to escape".
      2) She did consent, and either he or she shut the door for some privacy.

      In both cases, the door gets shut.

      --
      "I'm not sure I like the fugnutish tone you used in your post!" -RogL (608926)-
    6. Re:Huh by DragonTHC · · Score: 1

      lie detectors are not accurate.

      There are so many factors which can alter the results.

      The easiest is the simple butthole clench. It alters your blood pressure instantly, which affects the results of the polygraph.

      Now, an FMRI lie detector is 100% fool proof unless you've undergone extreme training to beat them.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    7. Re:Huh by c0mpliant · · Score: 2

      Using FMRI is not fool proof. You don't even need to be trained in it to beat that. At most its 80% effective, which will not be admissable in court. Is it better than the standard polygraph? Yes, but not, as you say, 100% accurate.

      --
      There is no -1 disagree
    8. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can't trust those FBI witch doctors to read the chicken bones right, I'd much rather go with a more accurate private-sector witch doctor!

    9. Re:Huh by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      As with most lie detector exams, it's usually not so much the results that are telling as the subjects' reactions when you ask them to take it (and let them know it won't be the FBI administering it).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    10. Re:Huh by 2.7182 · · Score: 1

      So true. They should have a TV show about this sort of thing. Instead of focusing on the cops entirely, it could have a whole diverse cast of characters who work together to solve crimes. Oh wait....

    11. Re:Huh by kmoser · · Score: 1

      The easiest is the simple butthole clench. It alters your blood pressure instantly, which affects the results of the polygraph.

      Er, wrong. I remember reading an article in Wired a couple of years ago in which the author tried this trick to no avail. Of course, this is assuming you believe the article.

  2. wait wait wait... by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We're following this tabloid crap on Slashdot just because a door has an electronic sensor on it !? Get real, for fuck's sake.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
    1. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      +1 on this.

      What should we expect to see next? Topless photos of taken with a digital camera! See all the photos here!

    2. Re:wait wait wait... by Pieroxy · · Score: 5, Funny

      +1 on this.

      What should we expect to see next? Topless photos of taken with a digital camera! See all the photos here!

      Just out of curiosity, you forgot to put the link on the "here". Care to share?

    3. Re:wait wait wait... by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, no. The Slashdot crowd has interest in the goings on of the IMF and the players involved.

      In case you hadn't noticed, in addition to news stories about gadgets and software, we also have an interest in the things that make the world go around. Among these are copyright, trade mark and patent laws and litigation, money and finance and politics in general.

      If you have noticed, then I have to wonder how you failed to notice that in this case. He's the head of the IMF. He's a big-time shaker, mover and influencer in all things that make the world go around.

    4. Re:wait wait wait... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Why not ? We followed Reiser's trial because he was a filesystem maintainer. And isn't it interesting that even in these high-level cases, it took so long for authorities to realize there were tech forensics to do ? They have begun to talk about reputation of respective person before analyzing technical evidences, isn't that also interesting ?

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    5. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. Here they are.

    6. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      And also because the head of IMF is accused, a man who thinks that maybe we replace the old $$$ as currency for world trade.
      This would make the dollar act like other currencies, like when a country has trouble, the values is lower...
      I am guessing that there are some in the US who might not like this.
      ( Also he was the top candidate for the opposition in France to replace President Sarkozy. So expect little help from France. )

      There are to many questions and the press just screams "guilty" loud without asking stuff.
      He is shown unshaven, handcuffed dragged to court by two big police officers.
      America knows how to put on a show.
      He is put in a cell under suicide watch (so they can wake him up every 1,5 hours if I understood correctly)

      Something just doesn't smell right.
      Why a man like this would risk it to jump the maid his own hotel room leaves more questions than it answers.
      I am just looking for motive.

      Anyhow, he is now tainted and will never be back in the chair regardless of what.

      Somehow I hope that he is guilty, because he will surely serve some time. Might as well be for something he did.

      Just my 5 cents (yes, €)

    7. Re:wait wait wait... by zrbyte · · Score: 1

      Hear Hear!!! I have the BBC, NYT, etc for that. Keep it news for nerds.

    8. Re:wait wait wait... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      The Earth will continue spinning without fat-cats like him in it.

      Last I heard about the IMF, they were taking on third-world debt, which is caused by CIA coup d'etats and then blamed on "uneducated, warlike blacks" in the first place, and selling their own water to them. Or this that a different "IMF"?

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    9. Re:wait wait wait... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. Here they are.

      I can recognize a goatse-like link when I see one. This one is, however, very far to deserve the credit. This image is moderately disturbing, but nothing like the real thing really.

    10. Re:wait wait wait... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Seriously! After all, it looks like an open and shut case to me.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    11. Re:wait wait wait... by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He's the head of the IMF. He's a big-time shaker, mover and influencer in all things that make the world go around.

      Right, so talk about all of those world-affecting issues. The guy's resignation is salient on its own, if someone wants to post a good article on his tenure and the changes this event may effect. The keycard records that play an infinitesimal role in the situation is not salient, or even interesting, but was called out as if some tech shibboleth was required to get coverage here. It's stupid pandering.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    12. Re:wait wait wait... by khallow · · Score: 0

      which is caused by CIA coup d'etats and then blamed on "uneducated, warlike blacks" in the first place

      So let me guess. Either this quote is "completely made up" or quoted from a nutcase with no real power beyond the authority to mow his own lawn.

    13. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was asking for topless photos. He got one, hence the funny.

    14. Re:wait wait wait... by bjourne · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this is in no way news for nerds nor stuff that matters.

    15. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might have had a point if not for the fact that he has a history of sexual assault charges against him. Some from 9 years ago. Yeah, clearly the maid was just some slut who deserved what she got like Nina Reiser, right?

    16. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Earth will continue spinning without fat-cats like him in it.

      You can dislike what they do all you want, but pretending they don't influence things (for better, or for worse) just makes you look silly.

    17. Re:wait wait wait... by ginbot462 · · Score: 1

      >> nutcase with no real power beyond the authority to mow his own lawn.

      That's what she said! ... No, really, she said that then gave him $40

      --
      Atlas Shrugged : Thematic Story :: Battlefield Earth : Organized Religion
    18. Re:wait wait wait... by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

      I wasn't pretending that they don't influence things, at all. In fact, the fact that they are fat cats influences things for worse.

      However, I did say that earth will not stop revolving without this particular bunch of pigs / cats / whatever. People shrug off arguments about this saying "they're all the same" or "all politicians / bankers / insert_position_of_power_here are selfish, lets assume for that" whilst ignoring other systems of organisation, welfare and creativity which have still not been tried properly (yes, capitalism, I'm looking at you).

      --
      This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
    19. Re:wait wait wait... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      ... He's a big-time shaker, mover and influencer in all things that make the world go around.

      And who did he piss off in the US Government to get rape charges against him?

      --
      Be seeing you...
    20. Re:wait wait wait... by PPH · · Score: 1

      Yes. Because the state of the art in sensor technology, mesh networks and the like make this interesting for reasons beyond DSK's assault case. BTW, these door locks (as described) are nowhere near the state of the art. Your phone is tracking your every move, your underwear has embedded RFID chips, surveillance cameras have facial recognition systems and your car is reporting your driving habits to the gov't.

      So, when you return from a business trip and your boss asks you about the pay-per-view porn on your hotel bill and the two hookers that walked through the door at 1:42AM (and then back out at 1:56AM), you'll understand why.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    21. Re:wait wait wait... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      The part of the world that spins around Sarkozy certainly will, considering this guy was his only serious opponent for the next elections...

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    22. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get real, for fuck's sake.

      Finally, an appropriate usage of the word "fuck". Well, almost. I don't actually believe "fuck" can be used as a possessive noun.

    23. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I think I see what you're getting at. Your first post sounded like you were saying that with or without fat-cats in general, nothing would be different. But from your second post, guessing you simply meant this fat-cat in particular? IE, if IMF disappeared tomorrow, another fat-cat would just fill its place and it would be business as usual for planet Earth?

    24. Re:wait wait wait... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      And who did he piss off in the US Government to get rape charges against him?

      Probably the detective or officer who received the initial rape complaint. They hate it when people do that.

    25. Re:wait wait wait... by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      you mean he WAS

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    26. Re:wait wait wait... by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      No, the point remains valid. If he wanted to commit rape, he should be smart enough to choose his timing and targets more carefully. He'd be better off attacking someone he has power over, or attacking from a position of anonymity(I'm assuming he wants to rape for the power trip, since he could easily buy better-looking hookers if he wanted to. It doesn't make sense for him to do it in a hotel room he booked with all his personal information. The guy is too smart to be running around naked, attacking the first woman he sees with absolutely no thought given to how he could escape the consequences.

      My suspicion is that he probably tried to pay her for sex and they got into an argument over the price afterwards. Maybe he didn't want to pay, or she wanted more, whatever. Either way, he's managed to ruin himself.

    27. Re:wait wait wait... by Daniel+Kirksey · · Score: 2

      Speare, I think your trivializing what makes this interesting to the average Slashdot reader. The head of one of the most powerful institutions in the world is facing complete ruin in a case where the best circumstantial evidence is a simple computer log of "open" or "closed" ("0" or "1"). The computer is speaking with perfect clarity a language with which human witnesses still seem to struggle. What our glorious powers of inductive reasoning interpret from this witness is where the communication starts to break down. Whatever it ends up being, I'll always have more trust in the "electronic sensor" -- despite its limitations. I do appreciate your comment though; the question needed to be asked. Take care.

    28. Re:wait wait wait... by BillX · · Score: 1

      Why not? It can even be used as a preposition, for fuck's sake. "Bob was mortified when he came home to find his wife sitting afuck the mailman."

      --
      Caveat Emptor is not a business model.
    29. Re:wait wait wait... by Builder · · Score: 1

      He must be guilty then. I mean, he was convicted on those charges right? No? He wasn't? So actually, so far, he is innocent.

      Here's an interesting blog where a serving police officer claims that 8 out of 10 rape claims in his area are nonsense - http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/when-is-a-rape-not-a-rape-shock/

    30. Re:wait wait wait... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Something just doesn't smell right.
      Why a man like this would risk it to jump the maid his own hotel room leaves more questions than it answers.
      I am just looking for motive.

      The "motive" is that he fancied fucking the maid. Once people get enough money/power, they often think that they're untouchable.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:wait wait wait... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If he wanted to commit rape, he should be smart enough to choose his timing and targets more carefully

      Right, because only stupid people commit rapes, no one with above average intelligence has ever done so. Someone with poor impulse control is someone with poor impulse control, regardless of how smart they are.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:wait wait wait... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      He must be guilty then. I mean, he was convicted on those charges right? No? He wasn't? So actually, so far, he is innocent.

      Here's an interesting blog where a serving police officer claims that 8 out of 10 rape claims in his area are nonsense - http://inspectorgadget.wordpress.com/2011/05/19/when-is-a-rape-not-a-rape-shock/

      Well, if an anonymous blog says something, obviously it's true.
      Besides, whatever else it is, this is clearly NOT some hysterical/druggie girlfriend using a rape claim to the police to annoy the boyfriend, as so charmingly set out in Inspectorgadget's blog.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:wait wait wait... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Agreed, this is in no way news for nerds nor stuff that matters.

      It's certainly stuff that matters, and not all nerds are obsessed solely with flamewars over minimally differing computer programming languages.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:wait wait wait... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So, when you return from a business trip and your boss asks you about the pay-per-view porn on your hotel bill and the two hookers that walked through the door at 1:42AM (and then back out at 1:56AM), you'll understand why.

      A friend of a friend (I know) was a finance director, and a salesman once paid with a company credit card for two girls from an escort service. The FD said he'd approve it, as long as he could tell everyone about it, The salesman agreed, as it did his reputation no end of good.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:wait wait wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care about the technology aspect nor the political aspect ... I want to see pictures of her and see if she was worth it!

    36. Re:wait wait wait... by thehumble1 · · Score: 1

      How about that he casually mentioned in a pre-trip interview that he might be falsely accused of rape while on the trip. I mean who can be guilty if they prove their own innocence before they even are accused of committing the crime. People who rape like that don't think they are risking anything, that's why he called the hotel to mention that he left his phone there and even gladly went with the police when they told him they had his phone. No one at the hotel thought this woman was lying about it and if it was consensual, why would she run out immediately asking for help?

    37. Re:wait wait wait... by __aancvu2993 · · Score: 1

      I like momentum...

  3. I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by way2trivial · · Score: 4, Interesting

    anyone know what lock system it is?

    I only know the specifics of three electronic lock systems...
    and all three that I know? only key swiping.. not closings or how long a door was open.
    they can't even tell if the door was actually opened-- they can only tell that a key was used

    as in, if I flash my key and the lock goes green but I don't open the door?
    it records the key use but doesn't know I didn't open it.
    if the master metal override key is used is also recorded (and even triggering that event in the memory)
    wouldn't require the door to be opened (although it would be noticeable)

    anyone know of a lock system that does all they suggest?

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    1. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The lock system at my hotel *does* show when a door was not opened after a key swipe, but like the ones you mentioned, it also doesn't record closings and how long the door was open.

    2. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      The locks in my office building turn green and stay green for a number of seconds (I think about 15) or until the door is opened. If the door is held open for more then 30 seconds an alarm goes off.

      It's kind of funny, but kind of not. There's a bus stop literally right outside one of the entrances to the building. Normally what happens is a crowd of people get off the bus and one will use their card to open the door. Once the door's open the rest just rush in. Big security issue.

      One day someone rushed in with the crowd and stole the lunch of the guy in the office closest to the door. Could have stolen his laptop, but I guess the thief was just hungry. The guy belonging to the office saw the Thief leave his office and bolt out the door and back on to the bus, which then took off, as he was coming back from wherever he was. He locks his office door now whenever he leaves.

      The person who used their key card to open the door took the heat for the incident. I have to say it's kind of hard to unlock the door, but stop people from just walking in. Unless you have a gun and are a major @ss I guess

      Anyway the point is with the locks in my building, records are kept for who opens the doors and how long the doors are open for.

    3. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      A lot of systems record data such as is a door is open or shut, and how long for. Doors have to automatically shut if there is a fire also. Annoyingly one place where I worked which was a very large convention centre, if a door was left open, security would appear after a minute or so because the fire alarm would start beeping.

    4. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and all three that I know

      Just curious - did you work in hotels with $3K/night suites? I'd not expect them to have the same key systems as the La Quinta. Don't get me wrong, I prefer the La Quinta to the posh hotels (it's a bed for Pete's sake...) but my question is whether your experience is directly relevant.

      For instance, most office buildings I've worked in with prox-card systems will sound an alarm if the door is left open for more than 30 seconds (or whatever they're programmed for) to prevent unauthorized entry.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    5. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 2

      It's kind of funny, but kind of not. There's a bus stop literally right outside one of the entrances to the building. Normally what happens is a crowd of people get off the bus and one will use their card to open the door. Once the door's open the rest just rush in. Big security issue.

      Why not just use turnstyles?

    6. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      its a $5000 a night suite... I'm rather surprised there's not video cameras pointed at the door.

    7. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the entry system is for show, and to cover the asses of the building management company (it's not their fault that your employees circumvent their system). It is not for security.

    8. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...One day someone rushed in with the crowd and stole the lunch of the guy in the office closest to the door. Could have stolen his laptop, but I guess the thief was just hungry. The guy belonging to the office saw the Thief leave his office and bolt out the door and back on to the bus, which then took off, as he was coming back from wherever he was. He locks his office door now whenever he leaves...

      I'd just leave poisoned sandwiches out and secure the laptop.

    9. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by slashqwerty · · Score: 1

      its a $5000 a night suite... I'm rather surprised there's not video cameras pointed at the door.

      What sort of people stay at a $5000 per night suite? Do they want a video record of everyone entering and leaving the room?

    10. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Kreigaffe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Real estate.

      If they were really concerned about security, the outer-most door wouldn't be the one with the lock -- it would simply lead to a lobby or vestibule, a non-secure but indoor and dry area, visible to security, through which employees would pass in a more orderly fashion to a secure door leading into the building proper.

      People rush through because they don't want to form up in a line outside. Once they're inside, it's not so big of an issue to stand around a bit longer. They're out of the weather, away from the traffic. But security theater is so much more entertaining..

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    11. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I don't know why there isn't turn style there. All the other entrances lead to the main lobby and there are secondary locked doors to gain access to the office areas. I can only speculate that this one is different because on the immediate left after waking in is the shipping bay, which does have it's own entrance for deliveries, but we're not allowed to use that one for pickups. To move things like office furniture to the other buildings we have to use the entrance next to the bus stop. I don't know why.

      I also don't know why the bus doesn't just stop at the main entrance, which would put the crowd in the lobby with the commissar and secondary locked doors. The stupid bus only comes twice a day anyway, once in the morning and once in the afternoon.

    12. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by gnasher719 · · Score: 1

      The person who used their key card to open the door took the heat for the incident. I have to say it's kind of hard to unlock the door, but stop people from just walking in. Unless you have a gun and are a major @ss I guess

      Very simple, actually. Instead of just having a company policy "don't let anyone in behind you" have another policy "don't follow anyone through the door" with a major telling off if you are caught, even when you have a pass yourself.

      Once you do that and enforce it, anyone who follows you would have to be confronted.

    13. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Hellsbells · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I write software for card access systems.

      Smaller systems can record an event when the card was swiped, when the door was opened, when the door was closed and when the lock is engaged or disengaged.
      They'll also record an event if the door was opened without a successful card swipe.

      Most decent electronic locks will return this kind of data.

    14. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 3, Funny

      What sort of people stay at a $5000 per night suite?

      Rapists?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    15. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

      Commercial access control systems like those used in your building (i.e. Softwarehouse, Kantech, Lenel, Winpak Pro) are completely different from Hotel management systems.

      You have door strkes, readers, contacts, request to exit devices on standard access control, and those are all connected to a Controler, that manages access and events and sends all history to a server system. Every person has an access card that can be activated or revoked remotely.

      Hotel systems have standalone readers, with no door contacts. Without a contact, you cant tell the door status or record it. When someone rents a room, the clerk programs a new card. When the card is presented at the room door, the lock recognises the key and algorythm, deletes the old key and switches to the new key the card told it to use. There is no central monitoring or managing of each reader.

      The cost of wiring for each room lock in hotels would be crazy. Imagine having to wire each door at the Ceasars palace in Vegas. The cost would be phenomenal. (then again, they do wire all 6000+ cameras and record all video for a long time :) )

    16. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      As I mentioned a little higher up, the management of hotel doors and standard commercial access control doors is completely different. There is no monitoring on hotel room doors usually.

      Fire security is a whole other ball game too. And I very very very much doubt that they shut doors on a fire alarm. Almost ALL building codes in America and Canada require all electronically locked doors (especially those locked by Mag-locks) to UNLOCK on a fire alarm and/or at the very least be free to egress without delay or presenting any kind of credentials.

      Else people would just be BBQ'ed.

    17. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      Hotel key systems and office access control are completely different beasts.

    18. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      I don't make the security policies. We are told that if you see someone you don't recognize, ask them to produce their badge, which we're suppose to ware all the time. I've been here for over five years now, but I gave up after my first week when I was scolded for insulting one of the managements family members by asking them who they were and if they had a badge. I love where I work and the people I work with, but the culture here is pretty much keep your nose down and don't worry about others... Unless they steal someone's lunch at which point you shouldn't have let them in the building and interrogated them when you didn't know who they were.

      I don't care either way. I have a car and don't enter the building with a crowed. I may not ask people to produce badges anymore, but I introduce myself when I don't recognize someone. Either they tell me their name or they take off running (It's happened).

    19. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

      At 5000$, Id expect someone to manually delete all footage of my presence in the hotel.
      There is a price to privacy :)

    20. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by jrumney · · Score: 1

      The access control system that I worked on in the early 1990's recorded door open and close events (normally configured only to be logged when the door was open excessively long, unless it was a secure environment like a prison or bank).

    21. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Socialists?

    22. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      All swipe access control systems I've seen record key swiped, and door not closed x seconds after swipe events. Quite useful for finding safety breaches due to a door that has been jammed open.

      Though hotel chains may be different as holding doors open is modus operandi for the maids which on any given day may make it impossible to tell apart the legitimate doors not closed, and the cleaning staff in every other room.

    23. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Smaller systems can record

      So the next logical question is if this function is at all configurable? I know plenty of things systems everywhere CAN do, but I also know a lot of functionality which is superfluous to normal operation is often disabled so the logs are easier to navigate.

    24. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by PPH · · Score: 2

      Hotel systems have standalone readers, with no door contacts. Without a contact, you cant tell the door status or record it.

      You can monitor the latch status. And you can assume that the door is open when the latch is open.

      There is no central monitoring or managing of each reader.

      But the readers have a buffer that records events. When some unusual circumstance arises, management goes up with a reader and dumps a copy of the log. If nothing happens, the log is overwritten (over several days or weeks).

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    25. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The last Holiday Inn Express I stayed in had doors that would beep if they were left open for over a few minutes.

    26. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you don't know about the rule and are not an employee?

    27. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by b0bby · · Score: 1

      It's a $3000 a night suite, unless you're a French diplomat/VIP; they get an $800/night rate. Still pretty expensive.

    28. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by imahawki · · Score: 2

      Turnstyles aren't allowed by the fire marshal in my city. We're building a new HQ and they fire marshal said we cannot use them.

    29. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by cbeaudry · · Score: 2

      Some have history, some do not.

      And most do not monitor a latch status, however, brand new (as in installed within the last year) systems in brand spanking new hotels are starting to have some of these features.

      I dont see why Sofitel hotel would have these, but maybe they do...

      There is always a cost to these. In a hotel like the Sofitel (398 rooms), equipping the doors with a key system can range from $200 000 to $600 000.

    30. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

      I think I need to clarify I mean shut is not the same as locked.

      Yes, doors should unlock if they are locked, but if they are wide open, they should shut to stop smoke moving through the building. Smoke after all is the biggest killer in a fire.

    31. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by cbeaudry · · Score: 1

      It is possible some buildings have some such systems, however most buildings do not have doors systems that allow them to open or close them, except for handicap use.

      I am almost 100% certain there is no automatic shut clauses in any building codes concerning fire safety.

      Fire Safety concerning doors, has one main goal, allowing people to leave the building.

    32. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First unless they were insanly stupid, the rates are not $5000 a night. They are more like $1200-2500 depending on what room you want. Go look up Sofitel New York and see for yourself.

      The loby has cameras, the rooms do not. And the key cards for the rooms are the same as they are for most hotels. They simply keep time and unlock the door if the key is authorized. There are no door sensor to detect if the door is open. And besides even if there were propping the door open would defeat the purpose of having them (which is standard practice for any hotel I have stays at).

      If he was in the shower when she opend the door she would have closed it and gone to the next room. If he locked the door behind her, how did he get behind her and what did he do with that big cart she had in the door. The suite he was in is like any other suite. It has one door leading to the common or living room and one or more to the bed rooms. He would have had to be hiding behind the door to get behind her to close it.

    33. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Erm, and often people staying at hotels will prop the doors open, too, especially if they're expecting a visitor. And it's not like there are people sneaking into hotel rooms by following the legit people in. 'Please excuse me, I need to hide in your bathroom until you leave so I can rob you.' 'Quite all right, come in.'

      There's rather a large difference between how hotel security works and how security for a building works. The biggest security question in a hotel is whether or not the cleaning staff, and other people with master keys, are trustworthy. That pretty much is the entire 'security' issue.

      All the fancy electronic locks and stuff do is make things easier for customers to keep track of, and easier for the hotel to deal with lost or misplaced keys.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    34. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by grouchomarxist · · Score: 1
    35. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The lock is a model from "Plasticard Locktech International" according to "Le Monde" (french newspaper).

    36. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because you can just walk over them? You need somehting akin to a sluice that doesn't let more than 1 person pass at once.

    37. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know THREE ENTIRE SYSTEMS!? Wow, there can't possibly be more than THREE systems used anywhere in the entire world, you obviously have experience with every single system in existence.

    38. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      That doesn't necessarily make the feature useless to the point of disabling it. If you do monitor the closing of doors you may for instance go and investigate if you find a door has been propped open for several hours, or propped open at 2am.

    39. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by Hellsbells · · Score: 1

      Configurable.

    40. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      If he was in the shower when she opend the door she would have closed it and gone to the next room. If he locked the door behind her, how did he get behind her and what did he do with that big cart she had in the door. The suite he was in is like any other suite. It has one door leading to the common or living room and one or more to the bed rooms. He would have had to be hiding behind the door to get behind her to close it.

      Obviously, there's no way she might have been scared by a naked man attacking her, and so panicked and ran the wrong way, so that he could get between her and the door.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:I read that story before- and I work at a hotel by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Well, yes.

      But it might not be worth the expense of hooking all the key readers up in the first place.

      The way I understand that hotel locks work is that each door lock operates independently, and each key is programmed to open whatever lock for a specific amount of time. They're like normal hotel keys, but self-expiring.

      I think each card is signed with a private key when programmed, and the lock has the public key. If you had a card duplicator, you could make identical copies of the keys you were handed, but they'd stop working at the same time as the original. (I seem to recall a few hacks before they started signing them.)

      The locks remember who entered and when, but it's kept in the lock, not sent anywhere.

      Now, I could be wrong about how that works, but if they are using such a system, it would be rather expensive to put any notification ability in it, because currently there's no connection between the lock and the hotel computers.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  4. Which was it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    tried to attack the maid, and then shut the hotel door when she tried to escape

    If the defense for Mr. Strauss-Kahn maintains that the encounter was consensual, its version will have to accommodate the unambiguous computer record of her leaving the door propped open,'

    Above 2 statements are contradictory

    1. Re:Which was it?? by uglyduckling · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think they're contradictory, you've just spotted the obvious version of the story that would "accommodate the unambiguous computer record", and make the NY Times article a load of hot air. The maid will claim he shut the door to imprison her, he will claim they shut the door after mutually agreeing to sex. So these records prove nothing, other than that the encounter most likely started with the usual practice of the maid propping the door open to valet the room.

    2. Re:Which was it?? by Rhaban · · Score: 1

      She left the door open, began cleaning the room, got assaulted, tried to escape, and only then he shut the door.

      Where is it contradictory?

    3. Re:Which was it?? by BasilBrush · · Score: 4, Interesting

      First of all, does the door system really record the times of opening and closings of the door, rather than just door unlocking.

      If so, then the point is not whether either side can come up with a story NOW which can explain the record. But whether the record is consistent with the initial statement they gave to the police. Maybe both are statements are consistent with the electronic record. But maybe one of them isn't. And that would be vital evidence.

    4. Re:Which was it?? by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Both of them have likely already given statements to the police. Changing your statement after evidence comes out showing your a liar tends to prove things.

    5. Re:Which was it?? by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      If the consistency of the initial statement is what matters, I think he said he was dining with hist daughter at the time (at least that is what newspapers wrote that his lawyers were maintaining), so he would be screwed.
      IANAL but I think most "justice" systems don't work as simply/logically as that, and the lawyers can find ways to suppress statements (and even evidence).

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    6. Re:Which was it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think they're contradictory, you've just spotted the obvious version of the story that would "accommodate the unambiguous computer record", and make the NY Times article a load of hot air. The maid will claim he shut the door to imprison her, he will claim they shut the door after mutually agreeing to sex. So these records prove nothing, other than that the encounter most likely started with the usual practice of the maid propping the door open to valet the room.

      They have her statements so the door records could be used to make her out to be a liar.
      He hasn't necessarily talked to police.

    7. Re:Which was it?? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Virtually every hotel these days has security cameras dotted around the place. I can imagine that one shot of her entering the room in a normal manner to clean it, or the door being slammed, or her emerging in a state of distress, or screaming or being comforted by other staff and that's it for him.

    8. Re:Which was it?? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how much they had to pay her, and if there was a not-so-subtle deportation threat involved too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    9. Re:Which was it?? by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

      It's contradictory in the part where the computer says that the door was never actually shut, and both of their stories include shutting the door at some point.

      However, doesn't pretty much every hotel door have the little hinged lock on the inside that physically locks the door so it can only open a few inches? (This kind.) If you flip that over while the door is open and then shut the door on it, the door can't shut all the way. Could that be what happened? It would explain why they both said the door was shut when it really wasn't, although you'd still think they might have noticed that.

    10. Re:Which was it?? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 2

      I don't see the contradiction. Maid opens door. Maid props door open. Some time later as specified in her story the door would close. The amount of time is wha t becomes important. It's only useless (but not contradictory) if they both specified the same amount of time- because then even assuming that duration open was captured it wouldn't reveal anything.

    11. Re:Which was it?? by DavidTC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It would explain why they both said the door was shut when it really wasn't, although you'd still think they might have noticed that.

      You think someone closing the door for consensual sex might notice that, especially if she worked at the hotel and knew exactly how that worked.

      OTOH, someone shoving the cleaning cart out of the way and closing the door to stop someone from fleeing might not notice that, and the person attempting to flee might not either.

      Alternately, perhaps the cart didn't make it out of the way, and was still holding the door open. Perhaps the handle got caught in it.

      Incidentally, I've seen maids prop open doors with their cart, but I thought they just didn't want to bring the carts into the room, but yet didn't want to leave it, unobserved, out in the hall. Plus it would be tricky to get stuff off the cart without having to unlock the door again.

      I never realized they did it as a safety feature. It's doubly smart...it makes it hard to close the door, and if this hotel did it like the hotel I saw, and someone did close the door, the cart would end up outside the room, so that people could actually find the maid if she temporarily vanished in circumstances like this.

      Incidentally, the idea of a maid in an expensive hotel deciding to, during cleaning, to randomly have sex with some visitor is idiotic. Maids tend to be on tight schedules. I can see some hypothetical 'come back later' scenario, but during cleaning is just stupid.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    12. Re:Which was it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no contradiction. The man tried to attack the maid, and then tried to shut the hotel door. The maid propped the door open.

    13. Re:Which was it?? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      I've never heard of a justice system where statements to the police could be surpressed. Unless you could make a case that they'd been made under coercion. Certainly not the US. And whilst lying in a statement isn't necessarily overriding evidence of guilt of rape, it's certainly going to be considered as a significant factor by a jury.

    14. Re:Which was it?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sofitel policy for housekeeping is that the door remain open at all times when personnel are cleaning the room. The maid, per this policy, opened the door and propped it open. It was supposed to stay open for as long as she was in the room. The man closed the door. Not contradictory, just poorly elucidated in TFA.

    15. Re:Which was it?? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how much they had to pay her, and if there was a not-so-subtle deportation threat involved too.

      Why would "they" have to threaten her if they were paying her?
      Oh, that's right, you're just making up random shit because you believe that all rape claims are made by criminal/immoral women against innocent men.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    16. Re:Which was it?? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      And you believe that no one ever lies about rape, that no one can be bought off or threatened, and that it's just a coincidence that a guy who had pulled out way ahead of a pro-U.S. administration and had just the day before began speaking out against the dollar suddenly decided to take up a career as a sexual predator after 62 years with no criminal record. You probably also believe that a similar coincidence happened in Julian Assange's case too.

      Funny how many people who cross the U.S. these days are deciding to become rapists shortly thereafter.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. Closing the door equates to consent by mangu · · Score: 2

    It's not opening the door, it's keeping it open with the cleaning cart that matters. Unless she was a pervert who enjoys fucking with the door open, of course.

    1. Re:Closing the door equates to consent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn I gotta get me one of those electronic lock things in my office.

    2. Re:Closing the door equates to consent by CheerfulMacFanboy · · Score: 0

      So the fact that he didn't close the door is proof he wanted to rape her? Things got complicated compared to the old sock on the door knob.

      --
      Fandroids hate facts.
    3. Re:Closing the door equates to consent by thej1nx · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you being dense on purpose? The maid says that she had left the door propped open and Strauss closed it later, so the electronic records for the lock should corroborate her story. If the records show instead that the door was closed immediately after her entry, her story would not match up and will be proof that she is not being truthful. Simple enough.

  6. Thank you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    As a french, let me tell you, thank you America for doing what our justice system failed to do for at least 10 years.

  7. my unambiguous tush by fche · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The "unambiguous computer records" at issue here are the supposed times and codes of door openings and times of closings. It's unambiguously useless for telling apart situation (a) the attempted rapist guest closes the door and (b) the maid interested in extracurricular activities closes the door.

  8. The maid story is unbelievable by e70838 · · Score: 0, Troll

    DSK is very famous for its relationship with women. He loves sex and women love him.
    Generally, the women are very satisfied. Why on earth would he run after a maid if she was not make him advances ?
    In this story, only idiots could believe he is a sexual predator, the plot theory is by far the most probable.
    It is not the first try to trap him on his sexual weakness, but it is the first time it is not defeated.

    1. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      DSK is very famous for its relationship with women. He loves sex and women love him.

      Generally, the women are very satisfied. Why on earth would he run after a maid if she was not make him advances ?

      In this story, only idiots could believe he is a sexual predator, the plot theory is by far the most probable.

      It is not the first try to trap him on his sexual weakness, but it is the first time it is not defeated.

      well according to other reports on the Intertubes, she may be HIV+ so the unabiguous computer records will be trumped by the unambigous antibody records...

    2. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DSK is very famous for its relationship with women. He loves sex and women love him.
      Generally, the women are very satisfied. Why on earth would he run after a maid if she was not make him advances ?
      In this story, only idiots could believe he is a sexual predator, the plot theory is by far the most probable.

      "But officer, there's no way I could be a murderer! I've never murdered anyone before!"

    3. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by e70838 · · Score: 1, Troll

      The antibody records says nothing about the plot theory. In fact, if she is HIV+, this gives her a good reason to sell her services. She has nothing to loose and she needs money for medicine.

    4. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh, nothing like a good conspiracy theory with my morning coffee. Brightens my day. However, I prefer the more mundane, the simplest explanation is most likely the correct one. No matter what, two lives are irrevocably changed and not for the better.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    5. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

      Oh, he is not in his first assault offense, or so it would seem. He is known for his love of sex, yes, but also for his temperamental behavior.

      That said, was it an "assault" or just an advance that was a little too harsh? Where does the law draws the line there?
      Plus, the maid saying "I didn't know who he was" is also laughable. If she didn't know he was full of money, she'd never had sued in the first place.

    6. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Roman, is that you ?

      PS: your last movie sucked btw.

    7. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's obviously an alien conspiracy against Strauss-Kahn. He is himself an alien from Alpha Centauri and aliens from Sirius are vying control of Earth from Alpha Centauri aliens. To this end they have hired a shapeshifter from Vega to entrap him.

    8. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    9. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She didn't sue. She had him charged for assault, etc. Suing =/ charging, just like sewing=/ knitting. Just because things are of the same broad category does not make them the same.

    10. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by gilleain · · Score: 2

      It is not the first try to trap him on his sexual weakness, but it is the first time it is not defeated.

      "Oh no! My one weakness : sex! If only you hadn't been a woman cleaning my room when I stepped out of the shower or I might have been able to resist fucking you!"

      Don't make me laugh. If she's lying, that's one thing. But I don't think that 'sexual weakness' is a valid defence in court, somehow. This all reminds me of Julian Assange - it is possible that DSK is very good at his job, and great in many other ways, but _at the same time_ a sexual predator to some extent.

    11. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      Even if she's HIV+, can you prove the HIV came from DSK? Does DSK even have HIV?

    12. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by swalve · · Score: 2

      Only an idiot denies that sexual urges are rational. Some men like the chase. Where is the passion if women are lining up to suckle at your manly teet? Chasing tail is exhilerating, and overcoming objections is ego-boosting. Likely, he has done things like this before, and has previously relied on women's shame or discretion to keep it out of the courts. This time he was not so lucky.

    13. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by joekrahn · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this comment came from a man that is just as delusional and egotistical as DSK. He THINKS that all women want to have sex with him. In reality, he is garbage. I am looking forward to reading about evidence DSK's untimely death.

    14. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Somewhat related to your point; Daniel Kinge, creator and owner of Sparklebox (a website packed with great primary education resources he spent many years creating) also happens to be in jail for creating and possession of indecent images of children. A lot of UK schools have blocked Sparklebox because of this. Personally, I think it is a little short sighted and smacks of knee-jerk response, as there was no evidence to show that Sparklebox was in any way used to groom or harvest the details of children for sexual predation, yet teachers are now "deprived" of the educational content he created.

      I say "deprived" as many teachers access the site from home and bring the resources in on memory sticks or printed paper. The guy deserves to be in jail for his crimes, of which there are maybe a handful more abhorrent, but that doesn't stop him being a very good teacher.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    15. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have a few quite celebrity-aware friends. I'm always amazed at how many celebrities (A- to D-list) I come across when I'm with them. I can conceive of a poor immigrant woman not having either knowledge nor interest about the west's current nomenklatura. I'm French and, honestly, before this, I probably wouldn't have recognized him either. His name I would, his face,not.

      She's been cleaning $3000 a night rooms for 3 years. If she wanted to blackmail people, she wouldn't run off to the police, she would probably target business, sports, show-business people rather than politicians, and above all she would ask privately for money, not publicly for justice.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    16. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proofs of innocence of Julian Assange are available: http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message1282877/pg1
      For DSK, very few can be proved about what has happened in the room, we can mainly infer using the profile of the two people.
      The reputation of DSK is his weakness, because that gives suspicion that the maid could tell the truth. You need to learn more about the guy to be convinced it is a plot or a big deformation of reality.

    17. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      whether or not he "raped" her I don't know. Sexual assault could be as simple as she saw him naked and he made some stupid joke in an embarrassing situation and she thought he was coming onto her. In any case, If she walks away with a large cash settlement I'm pretty sure her life will be better.

      I don't know what the layout of this guys suite was, probably nothing like a regular hotel room, but I've stayed in quite a few hotels where the bathroom door is right next to the room door. I don't always take a change of clothes with me when I take a shower when I'm alone in the room. If I came out of the bathroom expecting to go get dressed and found myself standing in front of the room door wide open, with or without a trolly blocking it, I might be inclined to close door so other guest walking by wouldn't have to see my ugly naked butt as I went for clothes.

      I don't have to assume he has a lot of money or that the maid may not be quite as well off.
      I see two scenarios:
      1) It could be possible for her to have seen a situation to make some money in a settlement, with him or the hotel, by consenting to sex then later saying she was assaulted.
      2) It could also be possible that he did rape her thinking he could buy his way out later.

      Either way, I don't see the door records proving either situation.

    18. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by gilleain · · Score: 1

      The reputation of DSK is his weakness, because that gives suspicion that the maid could tell the truth. You need to learn more about the guy to be convinced it is a plot or a big deformation of reality.

      A plot? Much has been made of the fact that he mentioned the possibility of such a thing happening a month before this happened. What occurs to me now is this : why didn't he follow his instincts? If he thought there was some genuine possibility that he might be set up, then why try not having sex with random maids.

      I'm willing to entertain the possibility that it might be a setup. But if there is reasonable evidence of sexual intercourse between the two of them, then he is either an idiot or a liar.

    19. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 1

      Why on earth would he run after a maid if she was not make him advances ?

      The same question could be asked about most rapists. Or did you think rapists were only ugly men who never got any. Also his story doesn't make sense.

      • 1) Why would this maid want to give him a blowjob? He is a random old man? Did he pay her?
      • 2) If she wanted to have sex with him why did she charge him with rape?

      His story only makes sense if there is a conspiracy to convict him of rape. But we haven't seen any evidence of that. There is no story that she received a bunch of money recently. Or that she actually works for the CIA. All evidence points to this being some normal maid working a normal day at a hotel.

    20. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      Ah, but, in many cases, people will differ on what the simplest explanation is.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
    21. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by gilleain · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that it doesn't make sense from a purely logical point of view, but I can totally understand why a school would block that site like it was radioactive. The school's head(s) would be thinking about what parents would say, I suppose.

      Must suck to be a teacher that relied on this, though. What can you say : "I know he was a paedophile, BUT it's a great site!"?

    22. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by redelm · · Score: 2
      58% of france also believe DSK was entraped. It should be dispelled:

      Some women might well enjoy DSK. That does not mean all will. Some might like an aggressive approach. Not all will. He has had some past accusations (withdrawn).

      The victim is a muslim widow from West Africa with political asylum. She reported immediately and is inconsoleable. Unless this can be disproven and she is unmasked as some sort of agent, her word is good.

      If DSK is a predator, he would not wait for advances. If he is not a predator, why would he even respond to advances? Knowing the danger, he would have keeped it zipped.

      Or does 58% of france believe that true men never say no? LOL!

    23. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I should add the word rational.

      #1
      A baby is born in Hawaii 45 years ago. Today, as a US citizen, he is President of the United States

      #2
      45 Years ago a cabal implemented a plan to put in place a man who will bring socialism and destruction to America. They used a fake birth certificate, bribed doctors, used actors portraying parents and grand parents stating he was born in the US, while the truth is he was born in kenya, trained as a convert operative in Indonesia; they manipulated the election so he could finally bring ruin to this country.

      #2 is more fun, #1 is more rational and that's how I hope we mainly look at things. His dick "Allegedly" overcame his rational mind and he did something very stupid. They both pay for it in the end, no matter the outcome, and that is the sad point.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    24. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      You're a sick fuck, dude.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    25. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Plus, the maid saying "I didn't know who he was" is also laughable. If she didn't know he was full of money, she'd never had sued in the first place.

      What do you mean sue? Sexual assault is a criminal charge.

    26. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      used actors portraying parents and grand parents stating he was born in the US

      Aren't you forgetting the one grandparent who has stubbornly maintained that she was actually present at his birth, although she's lived in Kenya her entire life and has never been to Hawaii?

    27. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

      While the GP comes across poorly, the point is that his "sexual weakness" could be that he likes to have sex with attractive younger women. Such encounters can be dangerous for a married politician, but even more so for one visiting the United States with no diplomatic immunity only months after openly advocating for moving away from the US Dollar as the world's reserve currency. Also, don't forget his unpopular comments in last year's documentary "Inside Job".

    28. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm by no means an expert in this field, but from what I've read of the psychology of rapists, it's usually more about the power than the sex. Most men who rape men are heterosexual - they're sexually aroused by the act of forcing themselves on someone else, not by their victims.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    29. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      You mean the one grandparent who sorta said something that implied she was at his birth, and then immediately corrected it the next sentence?

      And has stubbornly maintained that position ever since, despite that misstatement of hers being continually quoted?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    30. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It is not a murder. Why would rape someone when you have the prettiest women at your knees ? You are OT or stupid ?

      I don't think you realise what the difference between rape and consensual sex is, which is worrying.
      Hint: if rape was just about relief of immediate sexual tension, you'd just have a wank

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      whether or not he "raped" her I don't know. Sexual assault could be as simple as she saw him naked and he made some stupid joke in an embarrassing situation and she thought he was coming onto her. In any case, If she walks away with a large cash settlement I'm pretty sure her life will be better.

      1) The charge is attempted rape, he forced her to perform oral sex but didn't have penetrative sex, there's no need for the quotation marks.
      2) Being naked and making a joke isn't sexual assault, and wouldn't result in her having to go to a hospital with minor injuries.
      3) Why would she get a large cash settlement? He's been arrested on criminal charges, as far as I know the US doesn't have some weird form of sharia law where the guilty party can compensate their victim instead of being punished. If he's found guilty, he'll go to prison even if he gives her ten million euros.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I agree with you that it doesn't make sense from a purely logical point of view, but I can totally understand why a school would block that site like it was radioactive. The school's head(s) would be thinking about what parents would say, I suppose.

      Must suck to be a teacher that relied on this, though. What can you say : "I know he was a paedophile, BUT it's a great site!"?

      Yeah, it's just a shame there are absolutely no other educational resources on the internet apart from Sparklebox for teachers to use.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      *sigh*
      You can chase as many women as much as you want, if one of them says "no" and you have sex with her, it's still rape.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      DSK is very famous for its relationship with women. He loves sex and women love him. Generally, the women are very satisfied. Why on earth would he run after a maid if she was not make him advances ? In this story, only idiots could believe he is a sexual predator, the plot theory is by far the most probable. It is not the first try to trap him on his sexual weakness, but it is the first time it is not defeated.

      I think DSK should sack you as his lawyer, dude.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:The maid story is unbelievable by Vanderhoth · · Score: 1

      1) The charge is attempted rape, he forced her to perform oral sex but didn't have penetrative sex, there's no need for the quotation marks.

      but I "like" quotation marks. Epically when I'm repeating something I've heard and cannot confirm myself.

      2) Being naked and making a joke isn't sexual assault, and wouldn't result in her having to go to a hospital with minor injuries.

      According to all the sexual harassment/equal opportunity courses my place of employment requires all employees to attend every year, sexual assault is any kind of unwanted sexual advance. It can be as simple as an unwanted look that can be interrupted as "He was undressing me with his eyes". As for the injuries, and I'm not saying they're not a result of assault, but they could have resulted from any number of activities. I'd rather wait for the evidence before assuming anyone is guilty. That is what the justice system is based on isn't it?

      3) Why would she get a large cash settlement? He's been arrested on criminal charges, as far as I know the US doesn't have some weird form of sharia law where the guilty party can compensate their victim instead of being punished. If he's found guilty, he'll go to prison even if he gives her ten million euros.

      Weirder things have happened. And who said anything about "the guilty party can compensate their victim instead of being punished"? I was saying she may be awarded cash. She could also go after the Hotel later on for compensation because they "didn't properly protect her". <= there are those quotation marks again.

  9. More interesting electronic evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    would be a linkage to a well-secured account on the Cayman islands, with $2 million deposited by a French entity, at the maid's discrete disposal.

    1. Re:More interesting electronic evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually there is, but it comes from a Hungarian entity, so it has nothing to do with this ;)

    2. Re:More interesting electronic evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      French or Russian. Most of the countries are very satisfied of his action at the IMF. Russia (and a bit USA) are unhappy.

    3. Re:More interesting electronic evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't notice, DSK was about to run for president against Sarkozy, with pretty good chances of getting the job.

    4. Re:More interesting electronic evidence by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I bet they got her for a helluva lot cheaper than that. A not-so-subtle "You know, if would be a shame if we had to deport you and your daughter back to Guinea" thrown in probably saved them a lot of money.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  10. As Admiral Ackbar said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its a trap!"

  11. Funny, I heard the same thing about their cameras by digitaldc · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I heard on the radio the other day that hotel and city surveillance cameras were going to be the key to prove his innocence or guilt since they are virtually EVERYWHERE in New York City.
    The other interesting tidbit of information is that DSK said that he would be set-up in some sort of entrapment sex scandal a few weeks before he arrived in the USA.
    Makes you wonder...

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  12. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by JustOK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "I'm going to be framed!" Sow the seeds of reasonable doubt before the crime.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  13. Much Broader Implications by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure it's just coincidence that on his first non-diplomatic trip to the US after denouncing the US Dollar Strauss-Kahn is found to be a perv, thrown in Riker's Island, and Geithner demands his resignation.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Much Broader Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the press. He was know to be a perv for years before this but no-one ever pressed charges before.

    2. Re:Much Broader Implications by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      And whoever paid the maid had more than enough ways to put whatever he wanted into the door record. Otherwise, there wouldn't be so much noise about "unambigous evidence" that the defense "may claim" $bullshit_explanation to weasel out of.

      This case is about as believable as the one against Julian Assange.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    3. Re:Much Broader Implications by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Are you implying that the U.S. would use a bogus rape charge to discredit Julian Assa...oops, I meant Strauss-Kahn?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Much Broader Implications by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      I'm curious as to how involved the FBI is in this investigation. The NY police would be VERY smart to tell the J. Edgars to go fuck themselves on this one. But I bet FBI showed up surprisingly fast to offer their help. Not that the FBI would ever take part in something like framing someone to discredit them. Nope, not them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Much Broader Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it's just coincidence that on his first non-diplomatic trip to the US after denouncing the US Dollar Strauss-Kahn is found to be a perv, thrown in Riker's Island, and Geithner demands his resignation.

      I'm sure it is a coincidence. This is going to go to court. Since when has the US's three letter agencies ever been able to put anything together that will hold up in court? Heck, they can't even collect enough evidence to get obviously violent, confessed terrorists convicted in a US court! They have to resort to military action and military detention.

      No way could they put together a snowjob this intricate.

    6. Re:Much Broader Implications by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 2

      Everyone knows he liked women, that has never been the issue unless you are one of those who think everyone who isn't monogamous and/or virgins until they get married... A pervert would be someone who employs more buttplugs than there are butts, not someone who just likes sex.

      The issue here is that considering the Euro Debt Crisis and how much of a change in direction his resignation would herald, we're talking about half a trillion dollars worth of Greek debt that will end up being restructured... In addition the domino-effect it will have.

      So this could very well be a setup, where they aimed at his virility. Or someone who realized how much money they could sue for, after getting paid for giving a blowjob. Or the guy might have gotten a bit too excited going beyond what she was willing to do. Or it might have been a real attempted rape as claimed.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    7. Re:Much Broader Implications by wisty · · Score: 1

      Q: How do you know the CIA didn't kill JFK?

      A: He's dead, isn't he?

    8. Re:Much Broader Implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes its possible this is a massive conspiracy that only you have uncovered. Or it could be that this guy has a known history of sexual assault and harassment and did it again. I choose to believe you because it seems MUCH more likely.

    9. Re:Much Broader Implications by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      Just a little hint: never read English newspaper about French politics, or vice versa. There's still enough animosity floating around that you can't get straight answers from one about the other. One notable exception might be the Economist.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    10. Re:Much Broader Implications by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 0

      Strauss-Kahn is found to be a perv

      Er, no. He's accused of sexually assaulting someone. A court can't find much of anything without a trial.

      "We, the jury, find the defendent ???"

    11. Re:Much Broader Implications by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      Oooh, cool. I've got another one.

      According to the documentary "Inside Job", hot-shot financiers are virtually all promiscuous johns, but the only one that ever paid for it was Elliot Spitzer, the Attorney General who was so famously prosecuting their financial misconduct.

      I believe only one grand conspiracy theory: those who have the gold make the rules.

    12. Re:Much Broader Implications by jon_doh2.0 · · Score: 1

      Thats the gaurdian, not the sun. There are many british papers, which many editorial policies.

      -- Grammar is effective when meaning is conveyed and i balk at english spelling conventions. So, go suck a pee-pee.

    13. Re:Much Broader Implications by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but I don't know why we have to hate each other. When we work together we achieve some pretty impressive stuff (Concorde, Channel Tunnel, Eurofighter etc.) and historically we fought on the same side twice last century. We like French cosmetics and wine, they like British fashion...

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:Much Broader Implications by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows he liked women

      There's a slight difference between enjoying consensual sex with women and trying to rape them, you know. His history includes other (alleged) attempted rapes, not just a bit of fucking around.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  14. Other reasons by maroberts · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hmm, man walks out of bathroom after having showered only to find someone in his room who may or may not be the maid. Could he have not thought she was a burglar or simply have being trying to force her out of the room whilst he got dressed? (Hey if everyone else can speculate with no facts to go on, lets join in!)

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:Other reasons by whoda · · Score: 4, Funny

      And the he ejaculated into her mouth and turned her around and bent her over because that's how justice rolls in France?

    2. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      trying to force her out of the room by locking her in? judging by his career, the guy is smarter than that.

    3. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maids at hotels like Sofitel have uniforms that shout "I am a MAID!" No way she could have been mistaken for anyone else by a man like DSK who has stayed at the hotel many times before.

    4. Re:Other reasons by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, I'm pretty sure he was the one who got fucked that day.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Other reasons by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Justice? That's the city of love mate!

    6. Re:Other reasons by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      trying to force her out of the room by locking her in?judging by his career, the guy is smarter than that.

      How can you lock somebody into a hotel room? Don't these door always open from the inside even if locked, for fire security reasons?

    7. Re:Other reasons by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      Naked man walks out of shower, sees pretty maid, and can't help having an immediate erection.

      Maid interprets this involuntary biological reaction as an attack, and rushes down to the lobby to complain about it to her manager... who makes her feel stupid by pointing out that this is a natural reaction of a naked male.

      So, she adds the other details in order to not seem stupid.

    8. Re:Other reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have such an odd and sad impression of how men and women actually operate. Everything which you say is normal is not. You'll be happier if you get rid of those strange preconceptions and try to learn what people are actually like

    9. Re:Other reasons by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Hmm, man walks out of bathroom after having showered only to find someone in his room who may or may not be the maid. Could he have not thought she was a burglar or simply have being trying to force her out of the room whilst he got dressed? (Hey if everyone else can speculate with no facts to go on, lets join in!)

      I think that's probably number three on the defense lawyer's list of excuses, after "he wasn't even there" and "it's not even fair".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    10. Re:Other reasons by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Naked man walks out of shower, sees pretty maid, and can't help having an immediate erection.

      Maid interprets this involuntary biological reaction as an attack, and rushes down to the lobby to complain about it to her manager... who makes her feel stupid by pointing out that this is a natural reaction of a naked male.

      So, she adds the other details in order to not seem stupid.

      Fuck me, you're going straight to full retard.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Other reasons by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      But then, don't turn around and later claim that it was non-consensual!

  15. Reasonable Doubt by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The maid will claim he shut the door to imprison her, he will claim they shut the door after mutually agreeing to sex. So these records prove nothing

    Fortunately the accused in our system don't have to prove anything, just convince the jury that there's reasonable doubt. If it boils down to a he-said/she-said situation, that shouldn't be too hard. If there's further evidence of sexual entrapment, even easier.

    But, no matter, he'll have been replaced at the IMF even before a pre-trial hearing, so the goal will have been met and it doesn't matter what the judicial outcome is.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Reasonable Doubt by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 0

      But, no matter, he'll have been replaced at the IMF even before a pre-trial hearing, so the goal will have been met and it doesn't matter what the judicial outcome is.

      Yeah, the world is really going to be shedding lots of tears for a guy with a long history of sexual assault charges.

    2. Re:Reasonable Doubt by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Fortunately the accused in our system don't have to prove anything, just convince the jury that there's reasonable doubt. If it boils down to a he-said/she-said situation, that shouldn't be too hard. If there's further evidence of sexual entrapment, even easier.

      But, no matter, he'll have been replaced at the IMF even before a pre-trial hearing, so the goal will have been met and it doesn't matter what the judicial outcome is.

      Shame that the presumption of innocence does not apply to rape in practice.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    3. Re:Reasonable Doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Actually, he has NO history of "sexual assault charges". Yes, he is known to be aggressive with woman, but in all his years of behaving this way, there have been no arrests or even claims of assault until now.

      Maybe he did it and it sounds like he's not a very nice guy, but it would be nice if we could stick to facts.

    4. Re:Reasonable Doubt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fortunately the accused in our system don't have to prove anything

      "I wish it were that easy." -ObL

      Sorry for the off-topic rant, but that was just too tempting.

      so the goal will have been met and it doesn't matter what the judicial outcome is.

      *cringe*

    5. Re:Reasonable Doubt by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Fortunately the accused in our system don't have to prove anything, just convince the jury that there's reasonable doubt. If it boils down to a he-said/she-said situation, that shouldn't be too hard. If there's further evidence of sexual entrapment, even easier.

      If the police didn't have anything more than a he-said/she-said situation, he wouldn't even have been arrested. And where does the "sexual entrapment" idea come from?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  16. Intelligence evidence by Issarlk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I bet a few people where listening to bugs planted in that room. too bad that kind of evidence will never become public.

  17. Ha! Another George Bush conspiracy!!! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1, Troll

    Oooops!

    Wrong administration...........never mind!

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
    1. Re:Ha! Another George Bush conspiracy!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different administration - Same Policies.....
      Bugger, so much for change!

  18. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by HikingStick · · Score: 1

    [Wild conjecture follows:] The fellow seems snarky enough to have made that statement with foreknowledge that he planned to take advantage of the maid, so as to have his prior claims that someone might set him up would be a ready defense.

    --
    I use irony whenever I can, but my shirts are still wrinkled...
  19. Something overheard in Rikers by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Dammit, how did Assange manage to get TWO women, I only got one, and it's the housemaid for Pete's sake...

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
  20. LOL WUT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are you kidding. It's all Apple, Facebook and bitcoin here.

  21. She lives in an apartment for AIDS positive people by whoda · · Score: 1

    Hopefully she used some teeth and gargled some spit down his dick.

  22. Note to self... by acoustix · · Score: 1

    Remove the door before attempting rape.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Note to self... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Remove the door before attempting rape.

      Only if you are an exhibitionist (... or want another maid or guest to join in on the fun...)

  23. Khan! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has been watching too much Maid in Manhattan lately!

  24. pure speculation by the defence counsel .. by doperative · · Score: 1

    > Under siege by thieves who regularly got their hands on old-fashioned room keys, hotels in New York began using electronic locks on their doors in 1977 .. They would leave an electronic trail, stamped with the times that a door opened, closed or was left ajar..

    I know of no such system that will detecd a door "left ajar".

    > Benjamin Brafman, a lawyer for Mr. Strauss-Kahn, declared that the evidence was “not consistent with forcible encounter”

    Has such evidence been released if so can we see it. I do know such systems have an offline mode where there would be no records kept. In such an offline system, each lock has to be visited in turn in order to register a master passcard. It performs some kind of checksum on the guest cards. Even if the locks were online they may not have been keeping full records.

    “They would have a record of her using the key to gain access .. They should have a record of the door remaining open for X period of time, and the door lock being actuated again. The system can differentiate between the guest’s card key and the housekeeper’s master key.”

    The word 'would', suggests the lawyer doesn't have any evidence, the corrected headline should read: Computer records hold key in IMF head's sexual assault, is pure speculation by the defence counsel.

  25. Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Freemason and Jew. Convoluted conspiracy yet?

    Posting AC for obvious reasons. Although I'm quite certain the Reptilians know who I am in any case.

    1. Re:Conspiracy Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strauss Kahn is both a freemason and a jew. Did he conspire against himself ?

  26. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I bet the FBI is busy rounding up all that footage even as we speak. "Yes, we need ALL the copies. Having them all helps with our investigation. And if it's digital, we'll need all your hard drives too. It's all spelled out in this subpoena that was signed by a judge the day before the rape."

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  27. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Maybe he looked at Julian Assange and saw what happens to those who cross the U.S.

    Making statements against the dollar, taking a decisive lead over a pro-U.S. administration, being a socialist...these are the kinds of things can can lead a man into a life of sex crime. tsk...tsk

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  28. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by PPH · · Score: 1

    According to a few reports I've heard, DSK is well known for making passes at women. Aggressively, in some cases. I doubt he pre-planned jumping the maid (I've seen maids in many hotels. Not always good.) but given his track record, he figured there might be some opportunity for playing grab-ass on this trip. So make the statement up front and deflect any subsequent complaints.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  29. Room service by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 3, Funny

    For example, if a male guest calls for service, the housekeeping department will send up a male attendant.

    “Oftentimes, male guests will order the pay-per-view adult movies, and then call for towels, perhaps hoping that a woman will be sent to bring them up,” said Peter M. Krauss, chief sales and marketing officer for Plasticard Locktech International of Asheville, N.C., which provides card keys to hotels. “So whenever they can, the hotels will send up a male if the call comes from a male guest.”

    Pssht! There are three kinds of adult movies.... And for one kind, it might be safer to send a female attendant, especially if the guest ordered extra soap...

    1. Re:Room service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Four, if you count the goats...

    2. Re:Room service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In Italy, if the concierge asks whether you also would need a blanket in your room, he wants to know whether you want to have a prostitute sent up to your room.

    3. Re:Room service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens if the male guest is 'gay'?

    4. Re:Room service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pssht! There are three kinds of adult movies.... And for one kind, it might be safer to send a female attendant, especially if the guest ordered extra soap...

      I know about AVI, WMV and MPEG, but I can't figure out which one goes with the female attendant?

    5. Re:Room service by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In Italy, if the concierge asks whether you also would need a blanket in your room, he wants to know whether you want to have a prostitute sent up to your room.

      So what happens if you want an actual blanket?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  30. No broader than rape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guy has a history of sexual harassment/assault. Victim says she was assaulted and forensic evidence seems to support her account. There's no need to invent conspiracy theories here.

    Just because a guy happens to be a "socialist" or French or anti-US doesn't make him *not* a rich, powerful douche who thinks he can do whatever he likes to whomever he likes. This guy violated another human being and deserves what he gets. I don't care who he is or what he thinks about our currency.

    1. Re:No broader than rape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This guy violated another human being and deserves what he gets.

      Whoa, whoa, wait a minute! He's not been convicted yet.

    2. Re:No broader than rape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't see why "socialist" goes in quotation marks. In France there is a party that calls itself the Socialist Party and he was going to be its presidential candidate.

      Yes, socialists are real, no need to pretend that it's all made-up.

    3. Re:No broader than rape. by whathappenedtomonday · · Score: 1

      Neither has bin Laden. I say: shoot the guy. [/sarcasm]

      --
      I hope I didn't brain my damage.
    4. Re:No broader than rape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guy has a history of sexual harassment/assault. Victim says she was assaulted and forensic evidence seems to support her account. There's no need to invent conspiracy theories here.

      Just because a guy happens to be a "socialist" or French or anti-US doesn't make him *not* a rich, powerful douche who thinks he can do whatever he likes to whomever he likes. This guy violated another human being and deserves what he gets. I don't care who he is or what he thinks about our currency.

      'Guy' has been found innocent on every previous charge so far, both in a court of law and an IMF investigation. Unless you know something that we, and the French and International courts, don't know, then I wonder where you get the front to have such certainty about the allegations?

        The current evidence (what little we've seen of it) does look bad, and of course you can give your opinion - but you know as little as any of us. The only people that know are the two involved.

      Of course it could just be that you're having a very childish reaction to a serious matter that requires patience and rigorous investigation.

    5. Re:No broader than rape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr... No. He does have a history of don juanism, but this far it was consuensal. Both histories (In US and in France) haven't been judged. So, this far, he must be considered innocent.
      After, if the court considers him to be guilty, then yes, I'ld agree ith you.

    6. Re:No broader than rape. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Guy has a history of sexual harassment/assault."

      It is usually the case in high end business or politics or entertainment that once one sexual harassment or assault charge occurs, a series follows. There will be those that believe it is verification of actual past history as you do, and those like myself, that the opportunity is for those to come forward to blackmail or to appear as victims.

      Saying there is "history" is meaningless to the facts of the case. Similarly, I don't care for police work, given once a charge is made, they go to determine the charge true, not to compile all and every piece of evidence, such as handprints on the doors. The NYT article is similar biased.

      He may certainly have done the crime, but yours and the reporters analysis are not objective and crap in the details that are left out. There is always a victim in these cases, and it's not always the accuser.

  31. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by CowTipperGore · · Score: 1

    "I'm going to be framed!" Sow the seeds of reasonable doubt before the crime.

    Indeed. I'm sure he had been stalking this maid for months, noting her cleaning scheduling and practicing his bathroom hiding routine. FFS, how does something like this get modding Insightful?

  32. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by _0xd0ad · · Score: 1

    That, or "Hmm, there's a fair chance during this trip that I simply won't be able to resist raping a cleaning-lady or two. I'd better sow some seeds of reasonable doubt, just in case."

    Either way... entirely possible, in theory, but still pretty far-fetched.

  33. Old news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to the Figaro (Link in french), the door was already opened by another employee, so the electronic record thing would be moot anyway.

  34. Blow job rape, highly improbable by Dollyknot · · Score: 1

    The bit about the blow job sounds very suspect to me, not that I'm into rape, but if I was, I would not stick my dick in some ones mouth - ouch, even if she had no teeth, she could cause me an awful lot of pain with her gums.

    --
    It's called an elephant's trunk whereas it is in fact, an elephant's nose, a nose by any other name would smell as sweet
  35. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, because the head of the International Monetary Fund preconceived the rape of an as-yet-unseen hotel maid in the middle of high class New York City weeks and weeks before he visited our fair city. He knew he was going to get laid, and by-god, he was going to do so by raping a hotel maid. And so he sowed those seeds of doubt long before he left his home town.

    Seriously?

  36. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Looking at the comments to the story linked above, there is one relevant one (that I happen to agree with), which I will quote here.

    Bob The Horse on May 17, 6:23 AM said:
    @KM: That makes total sense. On your logic, his thought process must have run like this.

    1. I want to run for French President. But I also want to rape people.
    2. If I'm going to rape people, I would prefer to do it in a nice hotel room. I better have a cover story.
    3. Give interview saying I am worried about a honeytrap.
    4. Go to NY and stay in nice hotel.
    5. Need to go to airport to fly back for meeting with EU leaders re: Greece, etc. But have a little bit of time to kill. Maybe can squeeze in a quick rape before my flight.
    6. Here's a maid. I bet no one will ever be able to trace this back to me and it definitely won't impact my chances of being President of France.

    Either he is the most stupid person in the world or he has been totally stitched up.

  37. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    indeed, it makes you wonder if he didn't plan this ahead of time with the intent of framing those he claims are framing him.

  38. 25 minutes by LoganDzwon · · Score: 2

    According to what information we've been given as fact, the maid entered the room shortly after 12:00 noon, and he checked out at 12:28. In that time, according to the maid he chased her, forced her to give him oral, anally raped her, tried to vaginally rape her. Anyone that's anal sex knows it's save to assume he must have washed up at lest a little. We know he put on his suit before checking out. I'm not saying I have opinion either way, but that is a lot to do in 25 minutes.

    1. Re:25 minutes by iserlohn · · Score: 2

      First rule of the r@pe club - you do not force oral unless you want to end up like John Bobbit.

    2. Re:25 minutes by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I thought it was attempted rape he was charged with, doesn't anal rape count or something?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  39. Re:She lives in an apartment for AIDS positive peo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that reminds me - what is *up* with porn these last few years? no i do not want to see some chick *gagging* on some guy, nor do i want to watch her spit the subsequent ropey mucuosy saliva all over him. call me crazy but i prefer to keep the vomit out of my fucking. for that matter, when did spitting before and during anal, oral, and vaginal sex become the norm?

  40. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Yes it does. Unless you're implying that he planned to rape an HIV-positive maid in NYC weeks before his trip?

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  41. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by rsborg · · Score: 1

    "I'm going to be framed!" Sow the seeds of reasonable doubt before the crime.

    What would DSK have to gain by commiting this crime?
    You know, as head of the IMF, I'm sure DSK could afford a decent call girl if he needed. In fact, what's to say this maid wasn't his call girl a la Elliot Spitzer's "Audre Dupre"?
    More details needed before we decide to hang this guy publicly.

    --
    Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  42. Verdict first, then get the evidence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The length of time the door was open or whether it was left open at all does not show that the alleged rape attempt took place. If a sexual act took place it could be the case that the door was initially left open but then closed because of a decision by the maid.

    Some people enjoy the added thrill of sexual encounters in semi public places. I suspect that most Slashdoters will already realise that what with their expertise in internet search facilities.

    Being a rich, fat, Jewish, capitalist does not make one guilty of rape.

    I have no idea whether there was an assault or not and nobody else on this forum does either. The jury will likely hear a lot more evidence than any of us will read about and I dare say their decision will be based on firmer ground than the views of anyone here.

  43. You don't have to be paranoid... by MikeRT · · Score: 1

    to see how obvious it was that the CIAFBIATFDEANSANRODIA hired an AIDS-ridden African immigrant to go to his room under the pretense of being a "maid" and then lure him into the hallway naked...

    Clearly, the poor SOB is the victim of entrapment.

  44. Why did she even enter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an unsavoury story but also strange, imagine you're the maid, you are doing a corridor of rooms, you unlock a $5000 room -- but you can hear this one has the guest in it, showering.
    Why didn't she just apologize, close the door, and continue with cleaning the next room?
    In her line of work this must be a common occurrence.
    Also if the room had a crazy rapist, he'd have to then step into the corridor naked to assault her. Much less likely and probably has camera surveillance.
    The part where she enters the room when she hears it's occupied is what I find odd.

    1. Re:Why did she even enter? by turtledawn · · Score: 1

      It's a posh suite - the bath may have been fairly far from the door, and have a decently soundproof door. We can't assume she would have heard him.

      --
      Uh, "if it looks roughly mouse-shaped according to my infra-red sensitive pit, eat it"? --Chris Burke 09-08-10
  45. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You would think that someone _really_ worried about entrapment would avoid leaving their DNA all over a hotel maid he did not know ...

  46. presumption of innocence? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    Presumption of innocence, anybody?
    Anybody?

    Beyond that: the guy was going to participate in elections in France, right? So at the very minimum, there is that. Also I don't know anything else about his life and his enemies, and he is/was the head of a powerful organization dealing with tons of money. Just saying.

    1. Re:presumption of innocence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also know he has assaulted women before.

    2. Re:presumption of innocence? by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      1. Presumption of innocence holds.
      2. Was he convicted of anything?
      3. Even if he was convicted of anything, again, there supposed to be presumption of innocence.

  47. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by dbateman · · Score: 1

    You do of course realize that DSK was the man most likely to be the next president of France up until this accusation? French politics is not really that clean either. Lookup "clearstream sarkozy" and look at how another party infight turned to corrupt means to taint Sarkozy's image before the last election, which backfired and ended up even boasting his popularity, eliminated the other presidential candidates.

    The next presidential election in France is in May 2012 and the socialist party is just about to select their candidate. The timing of this scandal is just "too" convenient. If he is guilty most French people I know say "let him hang", but most also have serious doubts given the political context surrounding the case.

    D:

    PS: Though I live in Paris, I'm not French

  48. Different with aircraft black boxes by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately a bad precedent has already been established with 9/11/01. The black boxes from the two aircraft which crashed into the Twin Towers includes the pilots cabin door activity (open and closing, etc.) and there is nothing to indicate any hijacking ever took place (i.e., only a brief, several second partial open and closing to allow passage of coffee to pilot). Therefore, it probably won't be admissable, given that it doesn't count for 9/11/01. (Truly, America is screwed!)

  49. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

    Yes, as head of the International Monetary Fund, lay the ground weeks in advance for your dastardly and elaborate plot to rape a otherwise unknown hotel chambermaid in New York.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
  50. Big story in Europe - lots at stake here. by florimon · · Score: 2
    In Europe, this has actually been big news, as there are several interesting facets on this case.

    You have to know, that the other big thing going on in Europe right now, is how to deal with the issue of Greece's severe debts, problematic economy, and them asking again for money, shortly after they've already 'received' over 100 billion euro's. Not only that, but Portugal, Ireland and Spain are also in trouble.

    This is causing a lot of political turmoil, with some even going as far as proposing that Greece be kicked out of the euro-zone, instead of spending more money on them. Now Strauss-Kahn was a leading proponent of giving Greece a second bailout, and he was due for a meeting on this very topic last Sunday with German chancellor Angela Merkel, but instead was pulled out of the plane that would take him to that meeting. No matter how DSK's case pans out, he's already gone from the IMF. Who knows what views on the Greece issue his successor will have? Or what the future of the euro-zone will look like? Will it include Greece defaulting on its debts, (forcedly) abandoning the euro and returning to the drachme, and if that happens and a precedent is set, Portugal, Ireland and/or Spain doing the same? Or if the weaker countries refuse to abandon the euro, maybe the stronger countries doing it instead (already 'threatened' by some politicians in The Netherlands and in Germany)...

    And of course conspiracy theories have also been aired, that claim that DSK was framed, either because of this euro-crisis thing, or because he was also the next presidential candidate of the French socialist party and was much less 'America-friendly' than current president Sarkozy.

    So all in all, I'd say it's as least as newsworthy as some of the other crap I've seen posted here :)

  51. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being just before the French election in which he was about to run for President you wouldn't put it past someone with a vested interest helping make sure he doesn't win the election, which was a virtual certainty up until now.

    It may be that this has become the default method of dealing with your opposition in the world of high corruption/politics, or it may be that he is actually guilty, however the timing of the matter and the recent mess with Assange will probably cause many people to believe that this was indeed a politically motivated setup.

  52. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by floodo1 · · Score: 1

    Yes, and all criminals are logical like Spock. I still lean towards this guy being framed but, as you say, only time will tell

    --
    I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
  53. Re:Funny, I heard the same thing about their camer by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    what's to say this maid wasn't his call girl

    Yes, they were playing an elaborate role playing game, spread over many years, culminating in his eventual arrest on sexual assault charges, humiliation and destruction because he's a masochist.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  54. Anonymous Coward raped my mother. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And now we also know that YOU have assaulted women before, since apparently no burden of proof is needed when someone makes baseless charges of this nature.