Slashdot Mirror


Nike to Unveil Self Lacing Shoes?

xTK-421x writes "Looks like Nike is announcing tonight (8:30PM PST) that they've finally been able to create the self lacing shoes from Back to the Future 2. TechCrunch reported on receiving an invitation to a Nike event taking place in Los Angeles today, where Nike would announce the release of the Air Mags, the self-lacing shoes that first made their appearance in Back to the Future II."

281 comments

  1. cheaper... by Hazel+Bergeron · · Score: 5, Funny

    It would be cheaper to hire sweatshop labourers to follow you around and tie your shoes as necessary.

    1. Re:cheaper... by mobby_6kl · · Score: 1

      It certainly would, but then it wouldn't be BTTF-cool, would it?

    2. Re:cheaper... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Even at $1 a day it seems like it be cheaper to buy the shoes. How little are you paying these shoe-tiers of yours?

    3. Re:cheaper... by KillaBeave · · Score: 2

      Even at $1 a day it seems like it be cheaper to buy the shoes. How little are you paying these shoe-tiers of yours?

      Well according to Sally Struthers they would be able to feed themselves on just 35% of that a day.

    4. Re:cheaper... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is good because she eats the other 65% of that, from the looks of her.

    5. Re:cheaper... by jdgeorge · · Score: 1

      Funny, but... no. There are a number of cheap solutions for this, such as this one. I wonder what Nike has in store.

    6. Re:cheaper... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      Even at $1 a day it seems like it be cheaper to buy the shoes. How little are you paying these shoe-tiers of yours?

      Woooosh! ............ .. oops, sorry, my jacket told me to push the button. I'm all dry now.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    7. Re:cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wooooosh!!!

    8. Re:cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The other 65% of the money, or of the shoe-tying kids? =P

    9. Re:cheaper... by pluther · · Score: 1

      Woooosh! ............ .. oops, sorry, my jacket told me to push the button. I'm all dry now.

      Shouldn't that be "Swoooosh!"?

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    10. Re:cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's cold, man, really cold.

    11. Re:cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even at $1 a day it seems like it be cheaper to buy the shoes.

      That'll be the new 'middle class' once the GOP are done with labor laws.

    12. Re:cheaper... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? She doesn't even cook them? Ewww.

    13. Re:cheaper... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      this shows us why america is so further ahead of everyone else.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    14. Re:cheaper... by Meski · · Score: 2

      I thought the untied look was 'in' (along with tripping over them and breaking your nose, but if you want to be a slave to fashion, go right ahead)

    15. Re:cheaper... by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Not in Norway - even sweatshop labourers are paid $20 an hour

      --
      This is blinging
    16. Re:cheaper... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The other 65% of the money, or of the shoe-tying kids? =P"

      They are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  2. About time by 0racle · · Score: 1

    2015 is right around the corner. Pepsi Throwback should have been named Pepsi Perfect.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    1. Re:About time by bstory · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looking forward to the Cubs winning the World Series too.

    2. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now it's time for mattel to get those hooverboards they are keeping hidden in warehouses out too.

    3. Re:About time by mloiterman · · Score: 1

      Let's not get crazy...we all know certain things only happen in the movies.

      --

      --"It is not the critic who counts...The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena..."

    4. Re:About time by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      You would have a better chance of picking up a Mr. Fusion at Walmart.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:About time by omnichad · · Score: 2

      hooverboards

      Those must really suck

    6. Re:About time by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      [ 2015 is right around the corner. Pepsi Throwback should have been named Pepsi Perfect. ]

      That would require the Pepsi execs to basically admit that regular Pepsi wasn't "perfect" already. Notice how they call it "Pepsi Throwback" as the Term "Throwback" is generally reguarded as a negative one.

      All it would take is a label change, but Pepsi probably won't do it.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    7. Re:About time by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      [ You would have a better chance of picking up a Mr. Fusion at Walmart. ]

      Any cheap appliance from Wal-Mart, ok all applicances are now made in China, will eventually they will catch fire releasing energy as their electronics and plastic burn in a breif flash producing *some* power ibnthe form of thermal energy.....

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    8. Re:About time by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Throwback is negative? Hrmph, ok, if you say so.

    9. Re:About time by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      Throwback as in "get off my lawn" and yes, I'd consider that negative. If I were to call someone or something a throwback I'd be speaking in a derogatory fashion of something old, unpolished, unrefined from lack of iterative evolutionary steps. A model T might be "interesting" for it's own sake as a throwback, but it certainly cannot measure up to even the cheapest and crappiest of modern passenger cars for safe, reliable, comfortable transportation.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    10. Re:About time by geekoid · · Score: 1

      throwback
      noun/THrbak/
      throwbacks, plural

      A reversion to an earlier ancestral characteristic
      - the eyes could be an ancestral throwback

      A person or thing having the characteristics of a former time
      - a lot of his work is a throwback to the fifties

      Take that last line.
      When applied to an attitude towards women, it's probably bad, but when applied to music it's probably a reference to the better qualities of music from the 50s.

      You might not think it is only used in a negative way, but all that means is that you are wrong.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol! You guys are killing me!

    12. Re:About time by DJ+Particle · · Score: 1

      Actually, "Pepsi Perfect" was meant to be a "fortified" version of Pepsi.

      And it currently exists - but they're calling it "Pepsi Max" IRL

  3. Forget the shoes by milbournosphere · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where's my hoverboard?

    1. Re:Forget the shoes by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I had the same thought: you watched Back to the Future (any of them) and your take-away was "gee, shoes that tie themselves sure would be nice"? You better be working on a Mr Fusion, flux capacitor, hoverboard, hovercar, hovertrain, and last but not least a 1.21GW lightning inductor (one good storm could power most of the USA).

    2. Re:Forget the shoes by leonbev · · Score: 1

      Hell... I would have been happy with just the dust resistant paper and the food dehydrator that they made the pizza with.

    3. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hell with the hoverboard. I want a flying car...

    4. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nuts to that! I'm in it for the double-necktie.

    5. Re:Forget the shoes by nemasu · · Score: 1

      Wrong unit, its 1.21JW.

      --
      I made an app! Shoutium
    6. Re:Forget the shoes by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least we did get the life preservers.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell... I would have been happy with just the dust resistant paper and the food rehydrator that they made the pizza with.

      FTFY

    8. Re:Forget the shoes by TeknoHog · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I did my master's thesis on the theoretical basis of hoverboards. The conclusion is that they are not feasible in practice, unless you have insane amouts of electric power to carry around, and don't mind hovering over a ball lightning.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    9. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Is it just me or does having to hover over a ball of lightning make the hoverboards seem even more awesome?

    10. Re:Forget the shoes by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      and don't mind hovering over a ball lightning.

      Why would I mind hovering over a ball of lightning? You just made the concept 1,000% cooler!

    11. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell... I would have been happy with just the dust resistant paper and the food dehydrator that they made the pizza with.

      It was a food REhydrator.

    12. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's my VOMIT bag if corporations have this much time and money to waste I should have to thr thrroo www WUUPPPP. Now someone get me my RedBall Jets.. I will lace these the 'Old Fashioned way'!? I mean, "Nike?" Who's running your show, Dennis Rodman?

    13. Re:Forget the shoes by black+soap · · Score: 1

      You think Doc Brown made up his own prefix, or used a less common (but still accepted) pronunciation of the SI "giga-" (10^9) prefix?

    14. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your masters thesis was only 11 pages? And was about hover boards? The educational system is fucked.

    15. Re:Forget the shoes by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Hey. If I'm hovering on a plank of wood? I don't mind hovering over a ball of lightning in a Faraday cage grade suit of chain mail.

    16. Re:Forget the shoes by Amouth · · Score: 1

      I've never ever heard of people complaining about having ball lighting.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    17. Re:Forget the shoes by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      That's what I'm talkin' about...

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    18. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make no claim to the above comment. It can be freely distibuted as long as nothing is rearranged or taken out of context. If you try to pin the aforementioned comment to me, then I will, without mercy, sue you inexhaustibly for copying it.

    19. Re:Forget the shoes by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      [ Nuts to that! I'm in it for the double-necktie. ]

      Well in the movie they portray Japan as the economic GIANT (Marty's Boss was Japanese), they didn't see China's rise.

      So now Marty's boss will be Mr. Huang instead of Mr. Fujimoto.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    20. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In his case it is difficult to say with any certainty.

    21. Re:Forget the shoes by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not quite a master's thesis in the sense of most universities. This was simply a "4th year project" that accounts for 30% of our grade for that year, and the rest is mostly exams. Then again, between 10 and 20 pages is not uncommon with purely theoretical final projects.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    22. Re:Forget the shoes by nemasu · · Score: 1

      Actually, I know he used the less common pronunciation of the SI "giga-", it was an attempt at something I read in a life manual once, "humor" I think it was called.

      --
      I made an app! Shoutium
    23. Re:Forget the shoes by Adriax · · Score: 2

      It was pronounced jiggawatt in the movie because that's the "true" pronunciation of gigawatt. Yes that includes jiggabyte and jiggahertz.
      Though only latin professors and apparently (according to google) a small group of old astronomers would actually care.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    24. Re:Forget the shoes by nemasu · · Score: 1

      Right on, I've officially switched.

      --
      I made an app! Shoutium
    25. Re:Forget the shoes by genner · · Score: 1

      Where's my hoverboard?

      Right here where they have been for years.

    26. Re:Forget the shoes by meza · · Score: 1

      What would joogle know about that?

    27. Re:Forget the shoes by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's not quite a master's thesis in the sense of most universities. This was simply a "4th year project" that accounts for 30% of our grade for that year, and the rest is mostly exams. Then again, between 10 and 20 pages is not uncommon with purely theoretical final projects.

      I think it would take a lot more than 11 pages to truly show that hoverboards are not feasible at all. You barely scratched the surface.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    28. Re:Forget the shoes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      How to be a pedant is not humor. Find a better source.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    29. Re:Forget the shoes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I've switchs to using Quagmire Unite.

      Giggity bit
      Giggity -byte
      Giggity watt.

      giggitypenis.

      Giggity !

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    30. Re:Forget the shoes by Khyber · · Score: 1

      "I think it would take a lot more than 11 pages to truly show that hoverboards are not feasible at all. You barely scratched the surface."

      Please, just a basic understanding of the Newton and Joule is more than enough to realize you'd need a car-sized nuclear reactor on your back to power such a device.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    31. Re:Forget the shoes by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Wait, so then you just cross BTTF with Ghostbusters, and you're golden.

      *80s-gasm

    32. Re:Forget the shoes by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The proton pack wasn't car-sized, though!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    33. Re:Forget the shoes by geminidomino · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dude, shut up! We're talking about riding on a floating piece of wood above a ball of lightning wearing a proton pack and self-tying sneakers. That is SO much a nicer vision of future than the real one.

      Buzz kill. :P

    34. Re:Forget the shoes by russotto · · Score: 1

      While I don't mind hovering over ball lightning either, I'm curious as to why you didn't consider diamagnetic levitation.

    35. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.21GW for a 1ms lightning strike is only 1.2 MJ. That's only enough energy to run a dozen 180W low pressure sodium street lamps for 10 minutes.

      One good storm could keep a single city's streets lit for a few minutes.

    36. Re:Forget the shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [adapted]

      Doc: "The only thing that could generate that kind of power is... a ball of lightning!"

      Marty: "A ball of lightning?!?"

      Doc: "A ball of lightning!!"

    37. Re:Forget the shoes by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      I used to keep a few giggity bytes of video on my computer.

    38. Re:Forget the shoes by lxs · · Score: 1

      Only if those Latin professors teach Greek as well, as many do.

    39. Re:Forget the shoes by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      "I think it would take a lot more than 11 pages to truly show that hoverboards are not feasible at all. You barely scratched the surface."

      Please, just a basic understanding of the Newton and Joule is more than enough to realize you'd need a car-sized nuclear reactor on your back to power such a device.

      That depends on the design, and obviously we don't have the understanding of physics to do it right now.

      There's really two approaches to it: (i) magnetism, and (ii) anti-gravity technology. One we generally understand; the other we have no clue about yet. So it would be very possible to have a hoverboard when you have sufficiently developed anti-gravity technology.

      The point? You're barking up the wrong tree to say it's infeasible, especially in 11 pages. The primary issue is our understanding of physics, or rather the lack thereof.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
    40. Re:Forget the shoes by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Same thing's playing out again today, in the future all the sci-fi movies being thought up right now where the China is the economic giant will get the same giggles in certain scenes that movies like Blade Runner and BTTF2 do now.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    41. Re:Forget the shoes by socz · · Score: 1

      Actually, in certain industrial operations they reverse the "hover board" to make it lift heavy materials effortlessly. They magnetize portions of the ground to lift pallet-like areas. It's really interesting. Before I knew about that, I first thought about it in school when using a magnetic vice for a grinder: if you can clamp a piece of metal to a powered magnetic surface, why not reverse the polarity and lift it instead? Pretty sweet! Now we just need a skate park using that!

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    42. Re:Forget the shoes by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

      Actually, in certain industrial operations they reverse the "hover board" to make it lift heavy materials effortlessly. They magnetize portions of the ground to lift pallet-like areas. It's really interesting. Before I knew about that, I first thought about it in school when using a magnetic vice for a grinder: if you can clamp a piece of metal to a powered magnetic surface, why not reverse the polarity and lift it instead? Pretty sweet! Now we just need a skate park using that!

      Congrats for describing Maglev - used in trains (metros) and others areas where friction matters.

      In fact, frictionless bearings use the same properties.

      --
      Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  4. Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by jandrese · · Score: 1

    Ok, so we have the self lacing shoes, but I won't be happy until I can buy my very own hoverboard. Wheels are for lamers.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      The hoverboard WOULD be possible if we had magnetic roads and pathways, or at least feasible, unfortunatley the hover-car is something a bit more difficult to acheive, but as we have seen with fan propelled flying cars, it too isn't very far off.

      This is both an exciting time and a terrifying time to be alive.

    2. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by Spunkee · · Score: 0

      The hoverboard WOULD be possible if we had magnetic roads and pathways, or at least feasible, unfortunatley the hover-car is something a bit more difficult to acheive, but as we have seen with fan propelled flying cars, it too isn't very far off.

      This is both an exciting time and a terrifying time to be alive.

      Indeed. People can't have hover cars until they're completely self-controlled (the cars). A lot of people can't even drive down the road on 4 wheels without fucking everything up.

    3. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when BTTF came out, one of the producers was on Good Morning America, and answered a question about how they did the flying skateboards. He explained to the host that "mag-lev skateboards" were in fact nothing new - they had been around since the 1950's, but were dangerous enough that the Consumer Products Safety Commission had caused them to be pulled from the market.

      Hearing this, it became my mission to acquire a mag-lev skateboard. I tracked down the producer's phone number and called, in order to locate one.

      A very annoyed secretary answered, and her tone of voice indicated that mine was probably the 100th such call that morning. The call went something like this:

      Me: I just heard (producer's name) on Good Morning America, and I'm calling to get some information about the mag-lev skateboards used in filming ....
      Her, interrupting: There's no such thing as a mag-lev skateboard.
      Me: But... on Good Morning America ...
      Her: Yes, I know what he said. And we're all very annoyed that he did that.
      Me: So there's no such ...
      Her: Goodbye.

    4. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Seems to me it wouldn't be too terribly difficult to build a mag-lev skateboard, assuming you were willing to limit yourself to just skating on a big magnet. Those big hockey-puck rare earth magnets should be more than strong enough to repel the weight of a person. How one retrieves the board after you accidentally flip it over is an exercise left to the reader.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Except the hoverboard worked in 1955, where there were definitely no mag-lev roads.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by tmosley · · Score: 1

      You would have to wear some pretty thick shoes to deal with the liquid nitrogen temperatures too.

    7. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by wagnerrp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Liquid nitrogen temperatures? Rare earth magnets operate at room temperature just fine. The problem is that they are not statically stable. Any pitching beyond perfectly aligned will cause the device to quickly and violently flip over, requiring excessive force to subsequently remove it from the ground.

    8. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duh. Just reverse the polarity after flipping.

      Bigger question is how to return to human form the squished mess that is the rider after getting caught between the board and the ground.

    9. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      Except the hoverboard worked in 1955, where there were definitely no mag-lev roads.

      And in the 1880s

    10. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Right, which is why you would have to use a superconductor rather than opposing magnets. Hence the liquid nitrogen temperatures.

    11. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by jameskojiro · · Score: 2

      No, Dummy......

      Just put to magnets back to back so both sides are a N or a S pole, duh!

      Morbo: That is NOT how Magnets work!!!!!!

      Also imagine if it did and then glue holding the two magnets broke....... Ballistic Magnet basically EXPLODING!!!!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    12. Re:Where is my freaking flying skateboard? by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Bigger question is how to return to human form the squished mess that is the rider after getting caught between the board and the ground.

      Considering the goal would be to levitate the user only a few inches off the ground, and the max weight of your user would be around 200 lbs, I can't see using magnets that could exert more than about 250 lbs of pressure across the entire surface of the board. While that wouldn't be very comfortable to have on top of you, most people wouldn't even crack a rib at that amount of pressure. Outright death seems very unlikely to me.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
  5. Video from BTF2 by rwade · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Video from BTF2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like these?

      or like these from http://www.power-laces.com/

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROEZs0HpFQc&NR=1

  6. What was the point of the video clip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Racks with shoes that look like something from BFTF. Also looks like the racks you see at a ski hill when you rent your ski or snowboard boots. So what?

    Are we just padding stories with multimedia?

    1. Re:What was the point of the video clip? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm about to unveil a pair of self washing balls on a Nike Exec's face.

    2. Re:What was the point of the video clip? by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

      yep, that was anticlimactic. Nike usually does good ads but that one didn't follow suit. I thought they'd tie themselves near the end (in sync or just on of them but something ...).

      meh.

      Odds are I won't pay for a overpriced nike shoe unless it's a Pegasus for running.

      --
      "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  7. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The future is here.

  8. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Is there actually a benefit to self lacing shoes?

    I don't see much value in such a development.

    Now if they could make the shoe lighter or conform better, but just automatic, I don't see the value proposition.

    1. Re:Why by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Probably the same value as pumps, air, shox, lights, neon, pockets, gels, etc. About $50 on the pricetag. Value!

    2. Re:Why by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

      I think the idea would be that it conforms better by tying it perfectly each time. To tie shoes really well you basically have to restring them each time or at least re-tighten all the loops leading to the action tie-off point.

    3. Re:Why by Ruke · · Score: 1

      I doubt that it ties as well as you could do manually. I would be shocked if the self-tying was for anything other than the novelty value, or if these shoes saw a wide commercial release, instead of just being some publicity stunt.

    4. Re:Why by tunapez · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A 'perceived value', regardless of real value to the end-user, makes a bigger margin if you hype it right. Who hypes crap better than Nike?

      BTW, it is amazing how fast 'my' smelly feet problem disappeared after I stopped buying Nike/Reebok/Adidas shoes. Go figure.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    5. Re:Why by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You are probably right, I am just trying to hold out hope.

    6. Re:Why by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2

      You do recall how the shoes work in the movie, don't you? They aren't actually tying any knots, just tightening what look like straps. I think microprocessor-controlled sneakers shouldn't have any problem tightening them just right every single time, unlike our sausage-fingered hands.

      I wouldn't disagree with the publicity stunt portion though, such a system is likely to be too expensive for now for due to equipment and BTTF licensing costs for regular use. Still, I'd get myself some if they aren't going to be too ridiculously expensive, my current shoes are falling apart anyway.

    7. Re:Why by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      There is no difference between a perceived value and a real value. All values are perceived. We decide to choose if something is valuable or not. Why is Gold so valuable? Sure it is rare (But not that rare) , and does have some cool properties but we have other metals that about as good. So why is Gold worth so much more then other materials that may be more Rare, or Useful? Because we choose it to be valuable.

      Probably going back millions of years when someone found a shiny rock and someone else wanted that shiny rock, so they were willing to give him so much food/resources for it.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you're right. Relativity plays a key role in determining value. Exploiting, perpetuating and/or encouraging ignorance still brings value to the uninformed. Problem is, IMO, this seems to be the MO driving modern, corporate America.

    9. Re:Why by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      I got money that says the mark up on the Nike self lacing system for shoes will be A LOT more than $50.

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    10. Re:Why by Chuckstar · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Plenty of things have actual, measurable value. Just to pick something extremely basic -- the value of fertilizer is that a given amount of land will yield more crops.

    11. Re:Why by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Is there actually a benefit to self lacing shoes?

      I have a manual handicap and cannot tie laces. So this is good news for me!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    12. Re:Why by brusk · · Score: 1

      That's an effect, but it's not value. Value is how much people are willing to give up (in money or equivalent) to acquire the fertilizer. If the fertilizer in question would have that effect, but no one knows that, or there is a cultural taboo against its use (because, for example, it is made from human waste), then in economic terms that property of the substance does not give it value.

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    13. Re:Why by blue_teeth · · Score: 2

      ASICS makes some good quality professional sports shoes. There are some ASICS models that tune themselves
      to suit women's menstrual cycle (apparently, the foot structure changes during their monthly periods).

    14. Re:Why by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      ASICS makes some good quality professional sports shoes. There are some ASICS models that tune themselves to suit women's menstrual cycle (apparently, the foot structure changes during their monthly periods).

      You can't argue with facts like that.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:Why by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Do they also have bear repellent in them? I heard their periods attract bears. They can smell the menstruation.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
  9. If Nike makes the shoes... by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    ... then we can probably expect the hoverboard will be made by Sony. Which will then need a memorystick in order to use - but only after you register it through your PS4. Anyone caught using a non-hovering board on any surface afterwards will be subsequently sued for patent infringement.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:If Nike makes the shoes... by Colourspace · · Score: 0

      Nice trolling!

    2. Re:If Nike makes the shoes... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Nice trolling!

      Actually, I fully agree with the commenter. Snarkiness and humor included, of course.

  10. Please god no jacket by Nidi62 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I dont care about the self-tying shoes. I wouldnt even be all that disappointed if they didnt make a hoverboard. But I pray that no one is trying to make the hideous jacket with the 4-ft long accordion sleeve. If anyone tries, they should be shot on sight.

    --
    The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    1. Re:Please god no jacket by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Too late. Some fans of the movies have already made a bunch of jackets for themselves. Usually when it comes to high-end fan-made replica clothing of this type, it is made from rare materials (sometimes the original stuff) and in very limited quantities, and therefore often fetch a high price, if someone is willing to sell at all. I saw it in The RPF's costuming forum.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  11. so this is the last generation ... by RichMan · · Score: 1

    So this is the last generation that will know how to tie even basic knots.
    *sigh*

    1. Re:so this is the last generation ... by denis-The-menace · · Score: 1

      and the last to think.

      Anything that requires thought will done using the internet.
      When we die the internet will need fags* to fix them.

      *If you have seen Idiocracy you won't be offended.
      For those that haven't: http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=Idiocracy+fags

      --
      Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
    2. Re:so this is the last generation ... by tunapez · · Score: 1

      The dumber and less self-reliant, the better for profit! Gullibility is just icing on the cake.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    3. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Anomalyst · · Score: 2

      Never fear, geek children will be trained to tie JAVA and LISP knots.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    4. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Lisp:
      First you define the shoelace; then you define acceptable knot formats.
      After that, you recursively call a looping function to create the knot.

    5. Re:so this is the last generation ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      So this is the last generation that will know how to tie even basic knots.

      The Boy Scouts will continue to develop some young men while the rest learn their life skills from XBox.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    6. Re:so this is the last generation ... by kevinNCSU · · Score: 1

      So this is the last generation that will know how to tie even basic knots. *sigh*

      One would assume everyone isn't going to stop rock climbing, sailing, boating, joining the Boy Scouts, tying Christmas trees to their car roofs, and having kinky sex all at once. WTF would they do on the weekends?

    7. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Beat me to it. Rope skills are still useful but it seems many have no idea what one would do with rope other than tie things together. I have friends who have had the sliders break on the end of the rope on their tent and not know what to do. The funniest rope story I have was when I went to the hardware store to purchase some rope pulleys and hooks so I could construct a block and tackle to pull an engine and transmission out of a vehicle. I went and asked the high school clerk where the stuff for a block and tackle was and I got a perplexed look. I then asked where the rope and pulleys were and he showed me to the isle. I then got what I needed and was asked by the clerk what I was going to be doing with all of that and when I told him he didn't believe me that it was possible that one would be able to rig up something using a few pulleys, rope, and hooks that would allow someone to lift an engine and transmission out of a car with one arm.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    8. Re:so this is the last generation ... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      and the last to think.

      From what I see on a daily basis, you're a reject today if you still engage in any of that razzamatazz-sparking process called (ewwwww) thought. :)

    9. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Dishevel · · Score: 0

      It would take a special kind of *fag* to give up their thought processing to yahoo...
      Google it. :)

      --
      Why is it so hard to only have politicians for a few years, then have them go away?
    10. Re:so this is the last generation ... by bjorniac · · Score: 1

      That's a LOT of things to do all at once...

    11. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there was only a Boy Scouts that weren't so hung up on the whole "Reverent" part of their 12 points and having some mystical "God" in their oath.

    12. Re:so this is the last generation ... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      They could always learn how to do Perl closures ... ;)

    13. Re:so this is the last generation ... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Scouts has gone to hell.
      I pulled my son out of it. It's mostly being used as a course to get kids into a church under the guise of 'usefull life skills' backed by a bunch of logical fallacies.

      Plus the teach intolerance in other ways.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:so this is the last generation ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I pulled my son out of it. It's mostly being used as a course to get kids into a church under the guise of 'usefull life skills' backed by a bunch of logical fallacies.

      Where are you? I'm leading a district in NH and that's definitely not the case here.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    15. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      It's very hard to get a Christmas tree onto the roof of the car while in a shibari tie.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    16. Re:so this is the last generation ... by bjorniac · · Score: 1

      That I'd be willing to try. But I think joining the Boy Scouts at the same time would prove a bigger challenge ;-)

    17. Re:so this is the last generation ... by tibit · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, though, I think that closures should be known by everyone who does any kind of software development, even if they don't use them often. It's a horizon-expanding type of a thing. I don't readily see how tying shoe laces could expand one's horizons, though.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    18. Re:so this is the last generation ... by tibit · · Score: 1

      I used plain old levers (2x4s) and rope to lift an engine in a Volvo 940 to replace the engine mounts. My wife had a lot of trust in me on that job -- her hands were on the line, so to speak.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    19. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      Usually with motor mounts I just use a hydraulic floor jack and jack the engine up. So you don't dent the oil pan get a wide board something like a 2x8 or 2x12 that is a foot or so long and put that between the jack and oil pan to spread out the force. When I pulled the engine and transmission it was both at the same time, granted it wasn't that heavy of a setup (from a 68 MG Midget) but it was an easy job, one arm to lift and lower, one arm to move it out of the engine bay. I am surprised that you actually got your wife to help you work on a vehicle I can't even get mine to check the oil on her car, or check the tire pressure.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    20. Re:so this is the last generation ... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      But I thought their motto was "Be Prepared". ;P

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    21. Re:so this is the last generation ... by tibit · · Score: 1

      :) My wife used to help me out solder circuit boards. With 0603 discrete components on them (those are 1.6 x 0.8mm), no less. And plenty of through-holes before that. There's a decently sized city in Europe (more than 0.5E6 people) where every single tram (street car) has a circuit board that she put together. She's not a geek, but she's not techno-averse. She was using kde desktop on a fedora core machine for quite a while, for example. Glitches and all. She even printed on it ;)

      She keeps her own tire pressure. I do oil checks sporadically, the car has an oil level sensor and will "scream" at you before it gets too low.

      Back then, I knew very little about working on cars, everything was new to me. And boy did I overpay on that 940 :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    22. Re:so this is the last generation ... by bjorniac · · Score: 1

      So the backpacks are full of ropes and extra toys? That explains a lot, actually.

    23. Re:so this is the last generation ... by socz · · Score: 1

      I got kicked out of the cub scouts on my first visit/meeting! So since then on, I look down upon your fine organization! (Except eagle scouts, they're pretty bad ass)

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    24. Re:so this is the last generation ... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      My goodness, what happened? I've heard some bad stories about the bible belt areas; for better or worse, policy is mostly locally controlled. It all comes down to who shows up to volunteer.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    25. Re:so this is the last generation ... by socz · · Score: 1

      Oh, its somewhat funny. I'm in So Cal and I went to my first meeting/trip to a sheriff's station... All I remember is the person in charge getting into it with my mom because we showed up a few minutes late and were asked to leave. So my mom was like WTF and argued. So I was "allowed" to finish that outing, but wasn't allowed to return lol. I don't really have anything against the organizations, I've met a lot of people have been in them and they're all cool, not like the ones who gave me the boot :P

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  12. Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Acknowledging that there's still a few years to check some of these off...
    Self-lacing sneakers? YES
    Mr. Fusion? SADLY, NO
    Hoverboards? NO
    1980s nostalgia? SOME (and I'm sure someone has opened a Cafe '80s somewhere)
    Flying cars? NO (nothing practical, anyways)
    Video calls? YES (though not quite as depicted, and what was with all those fax machines?)
    Video games without controllers? YES
    Flat panel screens? YES
    Chicago Cubs, World Series Champs? OH HELL NO

    --
    "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    1. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Note: I suppose the Cubs have won some World Series in the past, and therefore already qualify as champs. Once these things get past a century, it's easy to forget they happened.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    2. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by tunapez · · Score: 1

      1980s nostalgia? SOME (and I'm sure someone has opened a Cafe '80s somewhere)

      My buddy's 16yo daughter has big Go-Go's hair and was listening to Cindy Lauper a few weeks ago. I shuddered.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    3. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video games without controllers? YES

      "You have to use your hands?! That's like a baby's toy!"

    4. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story from last month sure sounds like a promising start to Mr. Fusion.

    5. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by GWRedDragon · · Score: 2

      Biometric door locks? YES
      Large-scale projected holograms? NO
      HUD glasses for driving? NO
      Weather control? NO
      Dehydrated pizza? NO
      Technological police state with instant conviction for crimes? WORKING ON IT

    6. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 1

      you forgot bundles of compacted compact disks littering the alleyways. = close enough

    7. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by sootman · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've had the idea to make a site like that for a long time--to make a scorecard of movies from the past that depicted the future, once we got past that date. (See also the book "Yesterday's Tomorrows")

      The two that immediately spring to mind are "Back to the Future 2" (made in 1985, set in 2015) and "2001" (1968 -> 2001). Also included would be "2010" (made in 1984), "Terminator 2" (made in 1991; Judgement Day was supposed to be in 1997), and "Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man" (made in 1991, set in 1996--not much to recommend it but I happen to remember it.) I'm sure there are tons of others--lots of movies (and TV shows, and books; not sure about plays) were set in the early 2000s.

      If anybody likes this idea and wants to make a cool wiki (with "affiliate links to amazon" as the mysterious Step 2), moviefuture.com seems to be available. I could build and host the site in about 10 minutes, but I don't feel like maintaining it, publicizing it, keeping the spam out, etc. I've got enough other projects that I'm not getting to. :-)

      In other news, I was saddened when Universal Studios Orlando changed their BttF ride into a Simpsons ride. Hopefully they made the whole thing "skinnable" and will bring it back (for a while, at least) in 2015.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    8. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      I want a screen saver that has digital Ronal Reagan Yelling at a Screaming Ayatolya Khomeni!

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    9. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Wow, you mention "Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man" yet totally forgot about "Demolition Man"?

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    10. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by TheRedSeven · · Score: 1

      In Chicago, there's a great hipster coffeeshop called The Wormhole (warning, the website sucks). It features all sorts of great '80s memorabilia like plastic lunchboxes, Goonies posters, Star Wars action figures, etc etc. But the absolute best feature is a real life, honest-to-goodness DeLorean, complete with a food processor glued to the back and dressed up to look like Mr. Fusion, and a California license plate that reads "OUTATIME".

      So yeah, there's plenty of 80s nostalgia out there, if you're willing to look for it.

    11. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by mla_anderson · · Score: 1

      Wow, you mention "Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man" yet totally forgot about "Demolition Man"?

      It was totally unrealistic, no one in their right mind would vote Schwarzenegger for governor.

      --
      Sig is on vacation
    12. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by geekoid · · Score: 1

      AS sued in the movies, the instant conviction would be awesome..sadly it can't be like the movies.

      Of course, we don't know what their rules about appeal.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by geekoid · · Score: 1

      President.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > what was with all those fax machines?

      Because they refuse to die! http://tech.slashdot.org/story/11/09/07/027235/Why-the-Fax-Machine-Refuses-To-Die

    15. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by jimmetry · · Score: 0

      The flat panel screen in the movie could be rolled up like a projector screen. We're nearly there, but not yet.

    16. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by sootman · · Score: 1

      Good one... but 2032 is a good ways away. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    17. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      What about "Last Action Hero"

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    18. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by sootman · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I forgot--the beginning is only a little in the future--1996 (released in 1993.) Will need to watch that one again.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    19. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pics?

    20. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Video calls? YES (though not quite as depicted, and what was with all those fax machines?)

      Sounds about right that we'll still be lugging those around in 2015 :-)

    21. Re:Hill Valley 2015 Scorecard by socz · · Score: 1

      what about the london projection? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z2D5pfYfIs8

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
  13. Whats the point by rossdee · · Score: 1

    Didn't velcro make laced shoes already obsolete?

    And trying to feed 1.21GW through the rear wheels of a Delorean would almost ce4rtainly leave two burning lines of rubber, but no time travel.

    1. Re:Whats the point by hellkyng · · Score: 1

      Thanks! I was pretty sure that movie was a documentary, I am relieved to learn otherwise.

    2. Re:Whats the point by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      but but buttttt.... Every lightning path-to-ground has an exact 1.21GW discharge, every time, no exceptions! Fact is fact, dude. /snark

      HUMOR!

    3. Re:Whats the point by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 4, Informative

      They weren't trying to feed 1.21GW to the rear tires, 1.21GW was needed to power the flux capacitor.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    4. Re:Whats the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks! I was pretty sure that movie was a documentary, I am relieved to learn otherwise.

      It obviously was, it's just that the while time traveling has altered the space-time continuum, so basically we're screwed now and there won't be any hover boards by 2015. Thankfully, the automatic laces will make it!

    5. Re:Whats the point by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

      [ but but buttttt.... Every lightning path-to-ground has an exact 1.21GW discharge, every time, no exceptions! Fact is fact, dude. /snark ]

      No, just a 1.21 GW relay so you don't burn it out.

      --
      Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    6. Re:Whats the point by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      I, as of this second, patent the resistor between the relay and ground that warms the shoe.

      Never mind the heat generated and what it will do; we'll worry about that after it hits the shelves.

      Booya!

  14. Video reminds me of the ending of Portal... by kungfugleek · · Score: 4, Funny

    The lace is a tie.

    1. Re:Video reminds me of the ending of Portal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect win!

    2. Re:Video reminds me of the ending of Portal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is just wrong on so many levels I can't imagine what the appropriate punishment would be.

    3. Re:Video reminds me of the ending of Portal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chell you bojo! Portals don't work on water!

  15. I hope this catches on. by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

    It's high time we move on from the useless and medieval shoelace. Living in the humid US Southeast, my sweat opens shoelaces on my running shoes faster than Houdini unlacing a straitjacket. They already make cycling shoes with velcro straps and plastic fasteners that would work great in running shoes, but for some reason athletic shoes have a focus on form rather than function.

    1. Re:I hope this catches on. by Slash.research_Kat · · Score: 1

      for some reason athletic shoes have a focus on form rather than function.

      I vote for shoe laces cuz I gotta look good when I work out... cuz I work out to stay looking good...

      --
      This is a research account for studying online commenting so we can create tools to improve moderation.
    2. Re:I hope this catches on. by eclectus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't think it's the sweat that doing it. You (like most people) tie their shoes using a granny knot instead of a reef (or square) knot, resulting in your shoes coming untied easier. Check this for a refresher. Stuff you should know, news for runners (and other people who tie their shoes).

      --
      This signature is a waste of 42 characters
    3. Re:I hope this catches on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try barefoot style running shoes from new balance.
      http://www.newbalance.com/nb-minimus/
      and use this knot :
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gsw_ZmeCD6Y

    4. Re:I hope this catches on. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      I vote for shoe laces cuz I gotta look good when I work out... cuz I work out to stay looking good...

      Spindly bits of string make you look good?

      Don't wanna know any more.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:I hope this catches on. by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the sweat that doing it. You (like most people) tie their shoes using a granny knot instead of a reef (or square) knot, resulting in your shoes coming untied easier. Check this for a refresher. Stuff you should know, news for runners (and other people who tie their shoes).

      I've seen this article before a few years back -- either I was doing it wrong or it wasn't working as advertised. Either way, there shouldn't be an "art" to ensuring that my shoes stay on. I should be able to put my shoes on with minimal hassle and forget about them.

    6. Re:I hope this catches on. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Seconded. I've been doing this knot for about a year and the knot has only slipped twice (vs. at least once a day). I've since taught my kids.

      For those without video: standard knot with two wraps instead of one.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:I hope this catches on. by 16384 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I used to have to re-tie my shoes a few times a day until I found Ian's knot site. Now I tie them with the Ian's Secure Shoelace Knot and stopped having problems. I don't even need to tie them so tightly as before, and they are almost as easy to untie as before.

    8. Re:I hope this catches on. by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      It's high time we move on from the useless and medieval shoelace. Living in the humid US Southeast, my sweat opens shoelaces on my running shoes faster than Houdini unlacing a straitjacket. They already make cycling shoes with velcro straps and plastic fasteners that would work great in running shoes, but for some reason athletic shoes have a focus on form rather than function.

      Dude, you're doing it wrong - "sweat opens shoelaces on my running shoes"? How in the bloddy heck are you tying them?

    9. Re:I hope this catches on. by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's the sweat that doing it. You (like most people) tie their shoes using a granny knot instead of a reef (or square) knot, resulting in your shoes coming untied easier. Check this for a refresher. Stuff you should know, news for runners (and other people who tie their shoes).

      I've seen this article before a few years back -- either I was doing it wrong or it wasn't working as advertised. Either way, there shouldn't be an "art" to ensuring that my shoes stay on. I should be able to put my shoes on with minimal hassle and forget about them.

      And everyone should know how to tie their shoes - it's pretty simple, and yet myriad people have their knots coming open all the time

    10. Re:I hope this catches on. by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      Until the battery acid leaks out after excessive physical beatings during a workout, disintegrating your skin and poisoning you. But wait, that's an awesome Rush-to-Market product with lawsuits attached that give essential "inadvertent and unintentional advertising".

      Not bad, not bad. I see where this product is a'goin! :>

      HUMOR, HUMOR.

    11. Re:I hope this catches on. by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 1

      You could just double lace them. Besides is learning how to tie a proper square knot that difficult. I do it two times every day.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    12. Re:I hope this catches on. by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      And everyone should know how to tie their shoes - it's pretty simple, and yet myriad people have their knots coming open all the time

      If myriad people have knots coming open, that's a pretty good case that a better solution is needed that doesn't require knots.

    13. Re:I hope this catches on. by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      You could just double lace them. Besides is learning how to tie a proper square knot that difficult. I do it two times every day.

      I already do this. No dice. It's when the humidity/dew point is ridiculously high that I have trouble. After about five miles in the summer, my shoes are completely waterlogged with sweat. The laces swell up and the knot comes right apart.

    14. Re:I hope this catches on. by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      So double-knot them. Your running shoes should be loose enough that you can slip them on and off without untying them (or breaking them) anyway, if you're running significant distances. Wear, run, retie once or twice to get them just right, double-knot, repeat in 400 miles. What is problem?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    15. Re:I hope this catches on. by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      So double-knot them. Your running shoes should be loose enough that you can slip them on and off without untying them (or breaking them) anyway, if you're running significant distances. Wear, run, retie once or twice to get them just right, double-knot, repeat in 400 miles. What is problem?

      Tying a pair of shoes once and then stuffing my feet into them is a hack. Resorting to this method is just further evidence that laces need some serious improvement.

    16. Re:I hope this catches on. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Either way, there shouldn't be an "art" to ensuring that my shoes stay on. I should be able to put my shoes on with minimal hassle and forget about them.

      It's called "learn to tie a square knot" -- it's not an art, and it's not something you have to actively think about once you learn to Do It Right. Well, you might think a little, but not much more than you have to actively think about the order in which you take off your parking brake or operate the clutch in a manual transmission (if you know how). You practice it until that way feels "right", and then from then on when you tie your shoes, you'll get big mental warning signs when you tie them backwards.

      If square knots are unraveling, that's a different issue. There are also lots of joining-wet-ropes-together knots that your local sailors will know, and you could in theory use those instead.

    17. Re:I hope this catches on. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe you aren' t tying it correctly..and yes there is a correct direct and an incorrect direction to tie your shoe,

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    18. Re:I hope this catches on. by gknoy · · Score: 1

      I wish that I had not posted, and had mod points. I'd forgotten about how awesome that site is. Thanks!

    19. Re:I hope this catches on. by ironjaw33 · · Score: 1

      Well, you might think a little, but not much more than you have to actively think about the order in which you take off your parking brake or operate the clutch in a manual transmission (if you know how).

      I drive a manual transmission because I enjoy it. If I didn't enjoy it, I would have bought a vehicle with an automatic transmission, of which there are plenty to chose from. With running shoes, I don't particularly enjoy dealing with laces but there aren't really any alternatives. You may enjoy learning to tie a new knot, but I would rather have shoes be something that I don't even need to think about -- just like driving a car with an automatic transmission.

    20. Re:I hope this catches on. by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 1

      You, my friend, need a quick-lacing system like these:
      http://squeezums.com/personalorders.html
      I used these for triathlons but carried them to road running just because they're so convenient and quick. Squeeze, snug, and you're out the door.

      There are other options but these are cheaper and just as effective.

    21. Re:I hope this catches on. by russotto · · Score: 1

      don't think it's the sweat that doing it. You (like most people) tie their shoes using a granny knot instead of a reef (or square) knot, resulting in your shoes coming untied easier. Check this for a refresher. Stuff you should know, news for runners (and other people who tie their shoes).

      I'm one of those people who is always having their shoelaces come undone. I checked that page and I _am_ doing it right. I tried doing it wrong on purpose (hard to do, as my fingers usually run on automatic), and sure enough the knot bow became angled... but my normal knot is correct.

    22. Re:I hope this catches on. by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Then stuff the loose ends into your shoes.

  16. I want the jacket! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your jacket is now dry."

  17. Unless you're chicken. by freaxeh · · Score: 1

    Nobody calls me Chicken...

  18. Is this for the BLACK market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... because we all know that blacks aren't very intelligent...

    Probably can't even tie their own shoelaces...

    1. Re:Is this for the BLACK market? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why the president wears loafers

    2. Re:Is this for the BLACK market? by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that these shoes won't come in black? /tongueincheek

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
  19. Tying shoes as a dying skill... by hiryuu · · Score: 2

    My wife and I have been extraordinarily disappointed to hear other parents admitting that their children (through third grade) don't know how to tie shoes, simply because the kids have never been given anything but slip-ons and velcro-type shoes of various kinds. A few parents have admitted that they almost never wear anything but crocs and flip-flops. Yeesh.

    --
    Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    1. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm one of those people. I'm sure we'll get around to teaching our third grader to tie shoes one of these days, but honestly, so fucking what? Why are you extraordinarily disappointed?

    2. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by pluther · · Score: 2
      Why?

      Times change, technology changes, and skills change.

      My ten-year-old nephew can't tell time on an analog clock, either.

      I don't know how to use a slide rule.

      My father doesn't know how to make an obsidian hand-axe.

      --
      If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
    3. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't know how to use a slide rule."

      I bet you do, and you just don't know that you do. A sliderule is just two log scales, and you already know you can multiply by adding logs. They can do other things too, but you know those too.

      There, see? You know how to use a sliderule automatically, because you went to junior high school.

      And reading an analog clock? To a first order approximation, you just ignore the minute hand and look where the hour hand is pointed. You can get an estimate within 15 minutes or so that way - the hand points directly to the time. You can't get simpler than a stick pointing to the answer, so I also don't believe people can't read analog clocks.

    4. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because knots are a useful skill? Now, and 10000 years ago.
      Can't tell time on an analogue clock? Those aren't going away anytime soon.
      I'd say a complete fail at parenting is the cause, not "things change"

      I know how to make a hand-axe, and use a slide rule. Both are not necessarily ubiquitous any longer, and is less useful. I generally use a steel axe and a calculator.

    5. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dear God, you'll be almost suicidal when you find out they don't know how milk cows or make butter or even such trivial things as weaving wool.

    6. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Bob+the+Super+Hamste · · Score: 2

      Why?

      Times change, technology changes, and skills change.

      My ten-year-old nephew can't tell time on an analog clock, either.

      So my 3 year old can tell time on an analog clock, sounds like your nephew might be a bit slow.

      I don't know how to use a slide rule.

      These were ancient when I was in school but I was curious and managed to figure it out without much difficulty on my own. Also I am proficient with the old style vernier calipers

      My father doesn't know how to make an obsidian hand-axe.

      Again I know how to do this. I actually learned it in boy scouts as part of some merit badge (it was one of the few Native American themed ones) and flint-knapping was part of the requirements to get it.

      --
      Time to offend someone
    7. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by VolciMaster · · Score: 1

      My wife and I have been extraordinarily disappointed to hear other parents admitting that their children (through third grade) don't know how to tie shoes, simply because the kids have never been given anything but slip-ons and velcro-type shoes of various kinds. A few parents have admitted that they almost never wear anything but crocs and flip-flops. Yeesh.

      And what's wrong with that? Until you need hiking shoes or lace-up dress shoes, why not wear slip-ons? I do for dress purposes all the time. Are you also averse to parents whose children only know how to wear sandals?

    8. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Whorhay · · Score: 2

      Except that making a hachet or ax from flint or obsidian would be completely foolish. The material is too fragile and would self destruct rapidly when put into use. It's much more valuable for making spear and arrow points. For an ax you'd want a fairly flat river stone that you'd grind an edge on. Which would explain why native americans weren't inclined to do a lot of clear cutting. Metal implements like ax heads and knives were very valuable comodoties when the europeans showed up with them.

    9. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by sootman · · Score: 1

      To the millions of people who will reply and say "so what?" I'd like to point out that learning to tie one's shoes is a good exercise in fine motor skills. That said, I agree that Velcro is easier to use.

      In related (the times they are a-changin') news, I personally know two kids under 10 who have gotten into a car and asked "What's that?" while pointing at the window crank. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    10. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      So my 3 year old can tell time on an analog clock, sounds like your nephew might be a bit slow.

      Not necessarily. I am certainly not slow but I do have my difficulties reading analog clocks, and I am in my thirties. I just never bothered to learn it - I didn't care much about time until I was twenty and by then I had a cell phone.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    11. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it weird that I can do all of those? Except that flint is far more common in my area than obsidian is.

    12. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you're slow too.

    13. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by hiryuu · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with that? Until you need hiking shoes or lace-up dress shoes, why not wear slip-ons? I do for dress purposes all the time. Are you also averse to parents whose children only know how to wear sandals?

      While my post was not intended as either a Luddite screed (I certainly don't bemoan technology changing) nor as a judgement on the parents of kids who don't know how to tie, it seems to have been taken that way. Replying to yours as it's one of the more coherent and less defensive ones. :)

      Mostly it's disappointment because I was raised (and still live by) a philosophy of gaining knowledge and skills for their own sake if nothing else. I would feel I was doing my children a disservice if I didn't expose them to skills and abilities that they'll likely need in the future. Velcro and slip-on shoes have definitely made life easier, but unlike buggy whips, shoelaces aren't going anywhere anytime soon, and it makes perfect sense to me to make sure it's a skill my kids have.

      In a way, it's like learning to drive a manual transmission - it's possible to go through life and never need to know how, but it's awfully handy and gives one more options to have that ability.

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    14. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everyone knows boy scouts are worthless. This proves it, have fun with your obsidian hand-axe with built-in analog clock. I'll tie my shoes the cool way. Resisting now is just going to make surrendering later on less enjoyable [for you, anyway].

    15. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the only thing knots are useful for in my world are shoes and trash bags. This is coming from a prior Boy Scout who had to learn all kinds of fancy knots as a kid (and has summarily forgotten all but the simple ones.)

      Now, I still think that Cable Lacing is a "cool thing" from a now bygone era but I don't regularly practice the technique. Zip ties and Velcro have replaced most all needs for complex wire wrangling.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    16. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      And what's wrong with that? Until you need hiking shoes or lace-up dress shoes, why not wear slip-ons?

      Snarkiness aside, probably because the first time you do need hiking shoes or dress shoes, you won't have time to adequately master the skill. And you'll feel like an ass for not knowing it, causing you to bypass potentially useful entertainment and mate-seeking activities, which is ultimately destructive.

      Its like being proud of not knowing how to drive a stick. You don't have to be good at it to have it as a tool in your arsenal, and trying to learn shortly after your hiking buddy (who drove) broke her left foot and needs medical attention won't exactly make you Mr. Popularity. See also riding a bicycle and lighting a fire.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    17. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Same goes for tying a necktie. You can buy fake ones, or clip-on ones, or have your wife tie it, but there's no substitute for knowing how to tie it yourself, well, in a way that you prefer. The next level is being able to do it right the first time, and then to be able to do it without looking at it. ;) (I can't do either of those yet.) You may rarely need to do it, but it's pretty nice to have the skill.

    18. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Learning how to do archiac things doesn't mean they have any practical value in modern life.

      My son can use an analog clock, but it takes him a moment because, quite frankly, there rarely is the need.

      My kids can tie shoe laces, but that is a good exercise fro fie motor control, so a parent that doesn't teach that skill is actually impeding their childs development...assume it's not being taken up in another way.

      I could teach them how to clean a chimney, operate a weaving machine, operate a PDP-11. and start a car through hand cranking.. but again, why?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    19. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      According the the article, apparently they ARE going away. heh.

      Yeah, shoelaces are good for fine motor control development.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    20. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does any of that refute the point that pluther made?

    21. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by russotto · · Score: 1

      Dear God, you'll be almost suicidal when you find out they don't know how milk cows or make butter or even such trivial things as weaving wool.

      You've got it backwards; making butter and milking cows were the trivial things that every farm child should know (pro tip: do them in the opposite order); weaving always was a specialized task.

    22. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Because there was no sarcasm being used.

    23. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Finally a car analogy, now I understand! This is Slashdot afterall.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    24. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Hmm, the only thing knots are useful for in my world are shoes and trash bags.

      In my world they're useful for tying people up...

      Although actually if you follow Japanese techniques you don't actually need knots as such (google, or don't if you're at work, Shibari).

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    25. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by lxs · · Score: 1

      a/s/l?

    26. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tibit · · Score: 1

      I seriously think that there are better things in life to worry about besides shoe lacing. Guess what, if you have daughters, I'm sure they couldn't lace a corset either. Probably neither could your wife -- at least not properly. How unbecoming of them, you know.

      I can't imagine why would anyone get in a knot over shoe lacing. It's just a shoe, velcro- or slip-ons are not necessarily worse for everyday use. If you're into hiking, skating or ballet, that's another story of course, but it's never too late to learn.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    27. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tibit · · Score: 1

      I haven't really tried it myself in daily use, but Feynman used to have a watch that was missing a minute hand, and he claims it was good to about 5 minutes.

      PS. I think I enjoy the Feynmanized version of Godwin's law better ;)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    28. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Cleaning chimneys is still important, though. If you have a wood-burning fireplace, as many american homes do, then you really want to have the chimney cleaned and inspected annually. Creosote fires often end up taking the whole building down. Creosote burns very lean since it's in a vertical pipe and has plenty of air supply. People are usually too scared to douse the fire and block the chimney draft once such a fire starts, if they are there to witness it at all - they may well be asleep.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    29. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Soldering 0402 surface mount discrete components is even better for that. You sneeze and your components are gone -- they are 1x0.5mm.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    30. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      So my 3 year old can tell time on an analog clock, sounds like your nephew might be a bit slow.

      Not necessarily. I am certainly not slow but I do have my difficulties reading analog clocks, and I am in my thirties. I just never bothered to learn it - I didn't care much about time until I was twenty and by then I had a cell phone.

      How can you not care about time until you're twenty? Were you one of those kids that was kidnapped and locked in a cellar for the whole of their childhood?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      My wife and I have been extraordinarily disappointed to hear other parents admitting that their children (through third grade) don't know how to tie shoes, simply because the kids have never been given anything but slip-ons and velcro-type shoes of various kinds. A few parents have admitted that they almost never wear anything but crocs and flip-flops. Yeesh.

      And what's wrong with that? Until you need hiking shoes or lace-up dress shoes, why not wear slip-ons? I do for dress purposes all the time. Are you also averse to parents whose children only know how to wear sandals?

      What's wrong is that adults who wear crocs or flip flops all the time look like retards, and they are passing on their retardedness to their kids.

      Beachwear should be worn at the beach only.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      To the millions of people who will reply and say "so what?" I'd like to point out that learning to tie one's shoes is a good exercise in fine motor skills. That said, I agree that Velcro is easier to use.

      Anyone over 5 or under 80 who wears velcro fastening shoes looks like an escapee from a secure mental hospital.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      it's never too late to learn.

      No, but some things are a hell of a lot easier if you learn them as a kid (for example, riding a bike or learning to swim).

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Easy. My parents woke me up every morning so I could go to school, and my activities after school consisted of hiking, reading books, or using my PC. In the very seldom situation when I needed to know when the next bus or tram arrives, I always could ask someone on the street so I actually never wore a watch. I still don't - except for a heart rate monitor when I work out sometimes.

      With that kind of life I really didn't care about time - as long as I was at home before the sunset, my parents were fine with it, since they knew that I was a total nerd and, unlike my sister, never would do anything stupid.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    35. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Yamioni · · Score: 1

      I can't imagine why would anyone get in a knot over shoe lacing.

      I see what you did there.

      --
      Cool post bro, highfive \o
    36. Re:Tying shoes as a dying skill... by Fned · · Score: 1

      Which would explain why native americans weren't inclined to do a lot of clear cutting.

      I don't know, the Aztecs seemed to do a pretty good job of clear-cutting everyone who got within reach, using obsidian axes.

      Oh, wait, you meant trees

  20. Get off my lawn! by hellfire · · Score: 1

    Okay, self lacing shoes are stupid by definition. Laces are cheap, relatively easy, and far more reliable than an electronic version. The shoes in BTTF are power and electronic driven. I could go around buying batteries and replacement shoes every time they break down, or I could just buy a pair of regular sneakers and be happy. Laces tying in most cultures is a child's rite of passage and everyone knows how to do it these days.

    In order to be interesting, first I believe you have to have a mechanical method, by where someone twists or pulls on something to tighten the sneakers, not electric based. But more importantly any solution has to be as reliable/as cheap/as easy as laces, and be better than sneakers on at least one of those points. Even the style people who buy $150 shoes just because they have some sports player's name on them are not going to be too impressed. Laces are like $.05 to make these days and a $150 shoe with laces vs $150 with a snazzy new lacing system is going to eventually get killed by Nike because it's not cost effective.

    Now kindly get your hoverboard off my lawn.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Get off my lawn! by LordOfTheNoobs · · Score: 2

      It's not on your lawn. It's just over it.

      --
      They're there affecting their effect.
    2. Re:Get off my lawn! by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      Shoes like this should not require batteries... a simple capacitor array driven by a small heel-pad dynamo should do the trick just fine. You could even add other electronics to the shoes, such as Nike's Bluetooth motion sensor and a WiFi repeater. Hey... why not add in a solid state wireless NAS as well?

    3. Re:Get off my lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not on your lawn. It's just over it.

      And that's a fact, Jack!.

    4. Re:Get off my lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not too long ago I dislocated my shoulder in an accident. Although I recovered, I would've loved self lacing shoes. Spending up to 10 minutes tying my laces with one hand was pretty depressing.
      I bought a prosthesis (my doctor subscribed, rather than being patched up like a mummy), and I can imagine my self buying the shoes as well, even if I would wear them for just a month.

    5. Re:Get off my lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blake Bevin started a kickstarter project with the aim of making an auto-lacing shoe.

      http://www.power-laces.com/

      Blake's aim isn't just about being cool, it's about helping people. Many people who may not have enough hand dexterity, lost digits or hands, or other disabilities could become more independent with self lacing shoes.

      If a sound design can be manufactured within a decent price range in order to help people, this is hardly stupid.

    6. Re:Get off my lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about people with disabilities who can't tie their own shoes? It may be a novel idea, but certainly not a stupid one.

      http://www.power-laces.com/

    7. Re:Get off my lawn! by rjstanford · · Score: 1

      Tons of people already sell them - here's one example ( http://www.speedlaces.com/ ), but there are many, many more. They're cheap, popular, and common. Why is this even an issue?

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    8. Re:Get off my lawn! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Maybe they are powers by walking?

      Plus, no one would buy a device where it's hard to change out a battery~

      "Laces tying in most cultures is a child's rite of passage and everyone knows how to do it these days."

      If the 1970s could get cell service, they would probably call and want the rite of passage back Seriously, fewer and fewer people know how, and almost no one know how to do it correctly.

      Electronic base means you can have sensors that could adjust depending on your need. Just walking around, loose. Start doing strenuous activity? I little more snug. Foot swells? adjust automatically. Hell, you might be able to also use them to monitor heart rate, blood pressure, hydration levels and stink.

      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    9. Re:Get off my lawn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about these......
      http://www.pumashoesnow.com/puma-disc

  21. Elastic laces by dbarron3 · · Score: 1

    Try elastic laces. I've been using them for 5+ years on my various running shoes. Once you've set them, there's no need to unknot them; just slip your foot in. They are plenty snug to hold your feet in your shoes, plus there is enough give to accommodate swelling if you're running for a long time.

  22. Power Laces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are trying to get in ahead of Blake Bevin's kickstarter project: http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/blakebevin/power-laces

  23. I'll buy them when.... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

    Well, it's an interesting idea.

    I'll make you a deal, Nike....

    I'll buy those shoes when you (or someone else) comes up with an 80s-style vest that blow-dries itself after contact with water.

    Build one that dries my hair on the way to work (in my car that flies and navigates itself) and I'll pay you an extra $100 for those spiffy shoes. Well, given inflation, I mean $10,000.

    I'll sue you for $100,000,000,000 when I lie in a hospital bed suffering from freakin' laziness and over-exerted 80s-coolness attempts. :>

    HUMOR. :)

  24. Really??? by WillyWanker · · Score: 1

    How fucking lazy have Americans gotten that they can't even tie their own fucking shoes?

    1. Re:Really??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they couldn't be any lazier than that post. Easy joke based on assumption and generalization. Your brain must be buzzing after such an accomplishment! Have a jelly bean.

    2. Re:Really??? by PPH · · Score: 1

      They can''t see them any more.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Really??? by Jeng · · Score: 1

      You really are a wanker, seriously who the fuck said this was a product specifically aimed at Americans?

      Nike is a multinational corporation, they are going to try to sell this to everyone.

      How fucking lazy are Brits that they can't even brush their own teeth? Sounds dumb don't it? Just as dumb as what you said.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    4. Re:Really??? by KendyForTheState · · Score: 1

      To be honest, if we could see past our big fat bellies we could do it ourselves.

      --
      ...I just came for the free beer.
  25. Kickstarter'd By Blake Bevin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.kickstarter.com/projects/1230434124/power-laces

    http://www.power-laces.com/

    I wonder how this will affect Blake's design / production.

  26. ahem by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

    GREAT SCOTT!

  27. AI in Shoes by jameskojiro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lister: Sometimes, I think it's cruel giving machines a personality. My mate Petersen once bought a pair of shoes with Artificial Intelligence. 'Smart Shoes' they were called. It was a neat idea. No matter how blind drunk you were, they could always get you home. But he got rattled one night in Oslo and woke up the next morning in Burma. You see, his shoes got bored going from his local to his flat. They wanted to see the world, you know. He had a hell of a job getting rid of them. No matter who he sold them to, they'd show up again the next day. He tried to shut them out, but they just kicked the door down.
    Rimmer: Is this true?
    Lister: Yeah. The last thing I heard, they sort of... robbed a car and drove it into a canal. They couldn't steer, you see.
    Rimmer: Really?
    Lister: Yeah. Petersen was really, really blown away about it. He went to see a priest. The priest told him... he said it was alright and all that, when shoes are happy that they'd get into heaven. You see, it turns out shoes have 'soles'.
    Rimmer: Ah, what a sad story. Wait a minute.
    [Thinks for a minute]
    Rimmer: How did they open the car door?

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:AI in Shoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But where do all the calculators go?

    2. Re:AI in Shoes by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      But where do all the calculators go?

      No one is sure. Currently they're all present and ... accounted for

      YEEEAHHHHHHHHHHH

  28. Early! by milimetric · · Score: 1

    What? This is 4 years early: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0096874/
    Do you realize what this could do to the space time continuum?!
    Oh wait, there's nothing to prove they didn't exist before 2015...

  29. Nike Viral Advertising Agency by Lexx+Greatrex · · Score: 1

    Thank you Nike. We realize you had a choice of schmucks to freely promote your ridiculous looking new shoes. We thank you for using /. as your viral marketing conduit of choice.

  30. Charging Required! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't want to charge my shoes and I don't want to be tased by TSA when find electronics embedded in my shoes. Did you view the charging station drawing? It's huge!

    Does one shoe tightness fit everyone? I never tie my shoes; they're lose enough to slip on while tied. I know others who tightly tie them every time they're put on. It doesn't sound like the electronic laces are adjustable.

  31. Power by dzr0001 · · Score: 1

    With my 2 phones, still camera, mini hd camera, and laptop, where the hell am I going to plug in another daily use device that requires constant charging?

    1. Re:Power by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Your shoes will generate power for all those devices.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Overdone by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    That'll be the new 'middle class' once the GOP are done with labor laws.

    On the other hand if we leave 'em along with Democrats, we'll all be begging to be an official Government Grand High Poobah Shoe Tier just to have any job at all.

    $1 minimum wage would actually mean high school kids could find jobs again. Why does a high-school kid need to earn $30/hour again?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Overdone by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      Why does a high-school kid need to earn $30/hour again?

      Because with the public schools, PBS, and most community services on the verge of shutting down from lack of funding, he already has to start saving up for his kid's private education.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  33. NOT SELF-LACING!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    At least according to this AP release:

    The sneaker maker on Thursday said it has created a limited-edition shoe based on a glowing pair that appeared in the popular 1989 movie "Back to the Future II." The 2011 Nike Mag is designed to be an exact replica of the fictional sneaker, including a glowing Nike name on the strap. But unlike the movie version, these shoes won't lace themselves.

    I mean really, Nike...WTF?

  34. But it IS stupid. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty of shoe types that do not even have laces. Hell, I myself own flip-flops, loafers, pull-on ankle boots and galloshes -- that's enough footwear to get me through all four seasons.

  35. From the article by geekoid · · Score: 1

    "so clearly something is afoot."

    I see what you did there.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. Not actually retail... by RobDollar · · Score: 2

    There are only 1500 pairs, and they're all going to be auctioned on ebay, for charity.

    http://www.slashgear.com/nike-mag-official-details-released-in-full-08178190/

  37. Two words by istartedi · · Score: 1

    Double knot.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  38. Details Released by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have everything except the power laces.

    Seems we will have to wait until 2015.

  39. Hate to be a stickler, but... by Ossifer · · Score: 1

    ---no wait! this is slashdot!

    LOVE to be a stickler:

    This is not actually self-LACING shoes--those shoes are already laced. This is automatic tensioning, not even tying...

  40. way past 1985 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    where are the Plutonium at my corner drug store?

  41. Not necessarily by jvonk · · Score: 1

    Rare earth magnets operate at room temperature just fine. The problem is that they are not statically stable. Any pitching beyond perfectly aligned will cause the device to quickly and violently flip over, requiring excessive force to subsequently remove it from the ground.

    Disregarding the hoverboard feasibility issue for a moment, I wanted to point out that it is possible to force the magnetic flux of an array to be almost entirely on one side of the array: Halbach Array. Use the array's flux to induce an opposing field in loops of wire via induction.

    Fun fact: Halbach Arrays are the reason many of those flat sheet refrigerator magnets only "stick" with one side and fall off if applied facing reverse.

    So, now we have replaced the issue of prying the hoverboard free if it is flipped deck-side down by making it twice as difficult to free the hoverboard if it sticks to a light pole deck-side up. Progress! (haha)

    1. Re:Not necessarily by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Plus if you're using passive induction on one side, it only works if you're moving. 'Boarders' would have to be a brisk walk or jog just to get enough lift to ride the thing.

  42. Very Cool Shoe by raymorphic · · Score: 1

    Wiki Nike Mag Saw a video about the shoe the other day.