Slashdot Mirror


Pakistan Bans 1600 Words and Phrases For Texting

Hugh Pickens writes "In a move reminiscent of George Carlin's Seven Words You Can Never Say on TV, the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority has handed down a ban on about 1,600 terms and phrases it has deemed obscene and told carriers they have seven days to block the words on their networks, or face legal action. 'The filtering is not good for the system and may degrade the quality of network services — plus it would be a great inconvenience to our subscribers if their SMS was not delivered due to the wrong choice of words,' says an official at a one of the telecoms. The list includes such words and phrases as 'idiot,' 'monkey crotch,' 'athlete's foot,' 'damn,' 'deeper,' 'four twenty,' 'fornicate,' 'looser,' and 'go to hell,' among others. There are also various double entendres included in the ban such as 'beat your meat' or 'flogging the dolphin.' Mohammad Younis, a spokesman for the PTA, says the ban is 'the result of numerous meetings and consultations with stakeholders' after consumers complained of receiving offensive text messages. 'Nobody would like this happening to their young boy or girl.'"

226 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Looser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's going to make giving instructions difficult. I hope no-one's working with an IPL over IM over there.

    1. Re:Looser? by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      Because its Pakistan I can't tell if they meant loser or if they were serious, it makes it even more difficult since they also seem to deem athlete's foot offensive.

    2. Re:Looser? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IPL = Illustrated Parts List, for all of you software people.

    3. Re:Looser? by syousef · · Score: 1, Funny

      Because its Pakistan I can't tell if they meant loser or if they were serious, it makes it even more difficult since they also seem to deem athlete's foot offensive.

      Reminds me of some very bad porn a work colleague at a former employer I won't name showed me. Hint: Feet don't belong there, you're doing it wrong!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    4. Re:Looser? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      flog your dolphin

      At 7-11 doesn't that mean the same thing as sell tuna?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    5. Re:Looser? by Z00L00K · · Score: 2

      IPL = Initial Program Loader

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    6. Re:Looser? by mangu · · Score: 2

      OK, I get it now. It becomes looser after an athlete inserts his foot there.

      The Pakistan Telecommunication Authority seems to have a weird taste for porn...

    7. Re:Looser? by Tomato42 · · Score: 2

      Institute for Penalizing Laughter

    8. Re:Looser? by swalve · · Score: 1

      "You pressed *WHAT* button!!?!??!"

    9. Re:Looser? by cgenman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Animal lovers will appreciate the banning of the words "Cockfight," and "Pussy Cat." Rich people will get behind "Deposit," "Penthouse," and "Showtime." Reporters will love "Hostage," "Kill," "Murder," "Suicide," "Sniper," and presumably "Stupid." Construction workers seem to get the best with the banning of "Deeper," "Back Door," "Laid," "Banging," "Dome," "Harder," "Hole," "Joint," "Period," "Slant," "Screw," and "Budweiser." Everyone else will get behind the banning of such horrible words as "Creamy," "Jugs," and "K Mart." And pretty much all feminine hygiene is, by definition, unhygienic.

      Strangely, they banned both root words and modifiers of root words... like calling out ass AND ass clown, ass banger, etc. It's like they don't know how filtering, or words, work. Also, they banned the phrases "XXX" which is, itself, a censor word to represent something else.

    10. Re:Looser? by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because its Pakistan I can't tell if they meant loser or if they were serious...

      As soon as I saw 'looser' on the list, I thought that they can't be all that evil. We do need a concerted effort to eliminate this example of stupidity. It seems rare these days to find anyone spelling "loser" correctly. Ignorant loosers!

      But seriously, this list seems a bit dubious to me. Why would a country so paranoid about having bad things said about the Prophet Mohammed only include Jesus Christ on the list as a blasphemy? Why would a country that was once a part of the British Empire (and as such, still has English as on of its official languages) have one word on the list with the British spelling "arse", and 71 words with the American spelling "ass"? Why would there be no attempt to include the deliberate misspellings, abbreviations and contractions that are typical of texters?

      It could be that they simply sourced a list of words from elsewhere, but it seems strange that they would not tailor it to their own country's requirements.

    11. Re:Looser? by Taty'sEyes · · Score: 1

      I thought 7-11 had the Slurpee?

      --
      We show geeks how to get their dream girl at EyesOfOdessa.com
    12. Re:Looser? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      "Want to come around and grab my DVD of Jesus Christ Superstar, I'll leave the back door key under the mat so you can let yourself in. The door is playing up recently so you may have to pull it a little harder than usual to lock it up, I expect it's just a screw loose in one of the hinges."

    13. Re:Looser? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Semprini?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    14. Re:Looser? by anubi · · Score: 2

      My parent clearly shows why this is a loser.

      People will just code around the blocked words.

      However, this will make for much frustration from people trying to have a significant conversation and inadvertently step on banned words.

      Read the list . (Same as above, I just copied it here to give you another whack at it.)

      Way too many common words used in meaningful conversations are on that list.

      I believe that 98% of the phrases on that list are indeed used for nothing else other than naughty texting. But what's to say that other "naughty words" will quickly be coined and substituted for the censored ones?

      We cannot enforce morality through technology and censorship like this. It will just frustrate everyone.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    15. Re:Looser? by grcumb · · Score: 5, Funny

      Strangely, they banned both root words and modifiers of root words... like calling out ass AND ass clown, ass banger, etc. It's like they don't know how filtering, or words, work.

      Kind of a shame they didn't use regex-based word subsbreastutions, though perhaps they didn't feel enbreastled to make any bumumptions.

      --
      Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
    16. Re:Looser? by milkywayer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Being a Pakistan who knows all the BS the current government has been doing (or not doing) for the past 4 years. This is insane. They failed at everything else, there's daily power loadshedding/blackouts, 2,3 days a week CNG (gas) blackouts, loads of corruption. And then they come out with strange moves like this out of no where to divert people's attention. This was really uncalled for. The only thing that every teenager and college student texts almost once a day is prank/hate messages about the current corrupt president Zardari, I wouldn't be surprised if there was 'Zardari' listed somewhere in those words.

    17. Re:Looser? by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Seemingly a random and disassociated list. Obvious purpose make it more palatable as more politically aligned words are added to the list. Silence private communication between individuals associated with the political opposition. After texts comes voice.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    18. Re:Looser? by Vastad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would a country so paranoid about having bad things said about the Prophet Mohammed only include Jesus Christ on the list as a blasphemy

      Ummm...because if they censored the words "Prophet" and/or "Mohammed", that would be censoring a pillar of the Muslim faith? How would the righteous and moral doublegood citizens of Pakistan discuss the most important person in their lives? Or is this a test....?

      Jesus is a prophet but not THE Prophet in Islam, so that's OK to make sure the infidels don't get to sell that silly concept outside of their strange cult.

      More importantly though, this is actually a good thing. Why? Because we can look to Urdu - the national language of Pakistan - becoming the source of an entirely new and titillating orgy of euphemisms and slang that will defeat this list and that can never adapt effectively to counter it. The authorities have unwittingly introduced chaos and creativity into the very evolution of their national language. In less than a year, I make a gentlemen's bet that there will be their equivalent of the Number 1 Top 40 hit by their equivalent of Justin Bieber or Duffy belting out lyrics about "big tracts of land" and "brown roses with small petals" that will have the older generation pleased at the agricultural bent of the song.....and the young'uns practically creaming themselves in laughter.

    19. Re:Looser? by MLease · · Score: 1

      Semprini?

      OUT!!!

      --
      I'm sorry; I don't know what I was thinking!
    20. Re:Looser? by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      I find your misspellings to be highly inflammatory and vastly funny!

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    21. Re:Looser? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Institute for Penalizing Laughter

      Heh.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    22. Re:Looser? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Note that all the words are in English though, not the native language of most people living in Pakistan. The people who came up with the list don't seem to understand English very well, and chances are it is ripped off from somewhere else.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:Looser? by DigitalGoetz · · Score: 1

      I think Gadget_Guy meant why the list only included Jesus Christ and not the whole slew of other contemporary dieties. That said, I totally look forward to the world getting an influx of imported Urdu slang. The only way they can truly curb this is to perform a 100% 1984 move and just turn that list of 1600 words and replace it with a list of ONLY 1600 speakable/writable worlds. Even then, the almighty innuendo will fight the good fight.

    24. Re:Looser? by Terranex · · Score: 1

      Lots of people over there are named Mohammed so putting that on a ban list would be like putting John or Jack on a list in the West, they're not THAT dumb.

    25. Re:Looser? by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Does this mean they Mohammed-off?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    26. Re:Looser? by Vastad · · Score: 1

      That's a fair point. My guess is there is already entrenched prejudice against Hinduism (i.e. the wonderful history they have with their neighbour India) and illiteracy takes care of everything else.

    27. Re:Looser? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      They also banned "four twenty". A number. Of course it references drug use among college students, but still... a number?

  2. monkey crotch? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    well, all I can say to that is:

    newsletter. immediately.

    (wonders what I have been missing all these years)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    1. Re:monkey crotch? by jo42 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Bumfuckistan!

    2. Re:monkey crotch? by Greyfox · · Score: 1, Funny

      I see Monkeycrotch.com has already been registered. I look forward to them getting their web site set up.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  3. Oh that's sure gonna work by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all we know how ppl using txt spel pfectly an don abbrev any wrds.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:Oh that's sure gonna work by mysidia · · Score: 2

      After all we know how ppl using txt spel pfectly an don abbrev any wrds.

      I'm sure they anticipated that... that's why the 1600 word/phase list is probably 1600 variants of the phrase "F**** the PTA" or "The Pakistan Telecom authority sucks"

    2. Re:Oh that's sure gonna work by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And as we all know from the early attempts of the MAFIAA to curtail the sharing of music by disallowing the names of certain songs to be part of a file being shared, people will invent creative ways around it. 1600 or 16000 variants, people will find some that will slip through and the info will get shared quickly.

      Censorship doesn't work. People route around it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Oh that's sure gonna work by ben_kelley · · Score: 1

      Except for loser, where you have to add an o when texting.

    4. Re:Oh that's sure gonna work by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      After all we know how ppl using txt spel pfectly an don abbrev any wrds.

      I'm sure they anticipated that... that's why the 1600 word/phase list is probably 1600 variants of the phrase
      "F**** the PTA" or "The Pakistan Telecom authority sucks"

      They're trying to steal the thunder of Jeannie C. Riley's mom?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    5. Re:Oh that's sure gonna work by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      The missed a lot of easy ones, like 'azz,' but got 'cumm.' It's a really weird list if you scan through it. 80% is stuff you would expect, but the other 20% is either stupid, 'idiot', or puzzling, 'cumbubble.' Seriously, cumbubble? I never even heard of that 'word' before, but it must be so prevalent that it needs 2 versions on the list ('cum bubble')?! Not to mention 4(!) versions of 'Dixie Dyke.'

      I seriously want to know how this list was generated, and who did the generating. It's the Venn intersection of "Makes Sense (sex slang)," "Normal Words (common usage)," and "Baffling (Dahmer, mother love bone)."

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  4. Didn't work in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pakistani users will have 1600 new euphemisms by the end of the week.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/River_crab_(Internet_slang)

    1. Re:Didn't work in China by flyingsquid · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pakistani users will have 1600 new euphemisms by the end of the week.

      How are we going to replace "flogging the dolphin" though?

      Abusing the porpoise?

      Whipping Flipper?

      Chasing the white whale?

      Shaking hands with Shamu?

      Strangling the Baird's Beaked Whale?

      Grinding the narwhal?

      OK, I've done my part. But we still need to come up with another 1594 new euphemisms for masturbation by Friday.

    2. Re:Didn't work in China by siddesu · · Score: 1

      They are doing it the wrong way. For total security, you don't ban threats proactively, instead you whitelist only the safe stuff. E.g. woodworking terminology is safe, unless you need to polish some rods, and so is cooking, unless you need to choke a snake or two for that aphrodisiac soup.

      Even the loosers win when they apply the tried and tested best security practices.

    3. Re:Didn't work in China by siddesu · · Score: 1

      you don't ban threats proactively

      Or retroactively, for that matter. Knowing all security practices backwards has me making mistakes at times. Backdoors, backdoors ...

    4. Re:Didn't work in China by tempest69 · · Score: 5, Funny

      discipline flipper

      But perhaps the better euphemisms are the ones that would have normal meanings--

      Shifting into third
      Grabbing Some Lamb
      Avoiding Traffic
      Out Shopping
      Hailing a Cab
      In a Meeting
      Discuss it over lunch
      Spinach

      If your mind just made up a whole bunch of messed up meanings for those euphemisms, then you might need serious help.
      Though enough words as euphemisms, and nobody will be able to reliably text..

    5. Re:Didn't work in China by larry+bagina · · Score: 2

      "going to Penn State"

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    6. Re:Didn't work in China by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Occupying Wall Street

    7. Re:Didn't work in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Even whitelisting doesn't work.

      http://habitatchronicles.com/2007/03/the-untold-history-of-toontowns-speedchat-or-blockchattm-from-disney-finally-arrives/

      "We spent several weeks building a UI that used pop-downs to construct sentences, and only had completely harmless words – the standard parts of grammar and safe nouns like cars, animals, and objects in the world."
      "We thought it was the perfect solution, until we set our first 14-year old boy down in front of it. Within minutes he’d created the following sentence:
      I want to stick my long-necked Giraffe up your fluffy white bunny.

    8. Re:Didn't work in China by kheldan · · Score: 1

      I don't know why you're posting as AC when what you're saying is 100% true. Forum and chat moderators since before the Internet was publicly-available have been trying to censor in this fashion, and all have found that it's a losing proposition: people will find ways around any wordfilter. Remember leet-speak?

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    9. Re:Didn't work in China by Mr.+Shotgun · · Score: 4, Funny

      http://www.sex-lexis.com/Sex-Dictionary/masturbation-male
      My favorite: Warming up the alter boys dinner.

      --
      Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the (supposed) good of its victims may be the most oppressive
    10. Re:Didn't work in China by martin-boundary · · Score: 3, Funny
      Beat you're meat?

      As a grammar Nazi, I request that somebody kill me now, please!

    11. Re:Didn't work in China by petman · · Score: 2

      Or you could just use the proper spelling for "masturbate", which, ironically, is not in the list.

    12. Re:Didn't work in China by identity0 · · Score: 1

      Here in Portland we just call that 'Tuesday'.

    13. Re:Didn't work in China by Xachariah · · Score: 1

      It's Pakistan.

      I suggest 'Worshiping Mohammad"

    14. Re:Didn't work in China by jazzmachine · · Score: 1

      Occupying Wall Street

      Where a number of instances of police *roughing up the suspect* have been observed...

  5. Hey now everybody chill by wjcofkc · · Score: 5, Funny

    After all: It's for the children! Right?

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    1. Re:Hey now everybody chill by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      They are thinking of the Taliban. Mentally the same thing.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    2. Re:Hey now everybody chill by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's for the children! Right?

      Not in a country where it's legal for a 60 year-old man to marry a 4 year-old girl, mate with her, then throw acid in her face and stone her to death for not wearing a burqa.

    3. Re:Hey now everybody chill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Somebody got a huge bill for their daughters texting and decided that the only way to end this problem was to censor the hell out of SMS so that saner and cheaper methods of exchanging vacuous phrases can replace the telecom's cash cow.

    4. Re:Hey now everybody chill by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      All of those things happen in Pakistan, but each one is illegal except for one*.

      - Age of consent for marriage is 18 for males & 16 for females under Muslim Family Laws Ordinance 1961. Underage marriages are illegal.
      - Throwing acid in a person's face was explicitly criminalized in May of this year and can get you life in prison. Under older Muslim law, the victim had the right to return the favor and have acid dribbled in the eyes of her attacker.
      - Burqa wearing is optional and largely AFAIK common mostly in areas that border Afghanistan. Stoning a woman to death for not wearing a burqa is murder.

      * The one legal bit you implied was forcing your wife to have sex. Pakistani law requires that the victim not be legally married to the perpetrator in its definition of rape, just like in many US states up until North Carolina was the last to close the loophole in 1993. Many states still don't protect a woman if she's incapacitated and unable to refuse her husband.

    5. Re:Hey now everybody chill by Mashiki · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's nice. But the AOC isn't enforced outside of major cities. Pakistan is quickly sliding into a imperialist islamist shithole. Meaning that sharia is the law of the day, and a wife or women who isn't subservient is disrespectful of their man, and in turn god. And where the whole sharia law thing has kicked into full gear, there's no such thing as rape. Unless you can find 8 male witnesses. And of course you can't rape your wife, she has to submit.

      The Burqa is also becoming a 'norm' throughout the country as the government tries to appease the hardliners. Keep up with the times AC.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Hey now everybody chill by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I thought that was only allowed for the holy prophet to shack up with a young one.

      Are we talking about Islam or LDS?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  6. The only appropriate response by presidenteloco · · Score: 2

    to Pakistan government on this one is

    g o t o h e l l a n d f o r n i c a t e you l o o s e r i d i o t s

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
    1. Re:The only appropriate response by renedox · · Score: 3, Funny

      a t h l e t e ' s f o o t

    2. Re:The only appropriate response by syousef · · Score: 1

      to Pakistan government on this one is

      g o t o h e l l a n d f o r n i c a t e you l o o s e r i d i o t s

      You want them to breed?

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:The only appropriate response by lennier · · Score: 5, Funny

      g o t o h e l l

      You had to say it, didn't you? You had to say that one little four-letter word. You couldn't just say "call hell" or "eval hell" or "do hell while true" or even "gosub hell". No, you had to put yourself right there beyond the bounds of civilised discourse and say The Word.

      Consider yourself harmful indeed, sir!

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    4. Re:The only appropriate response by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      G-TFO.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    5. Re:The only appropriate response by camperdave · · Score: 5, Funny

      g o t o h e l l

      You had to say it, didn't you? You had to say that one little four-letter word. You couldn't just say "call hell" or "eval hell" or "do hell while true" or even "gosub hell".

      The implication is that there is no return. Gosub hell indeed.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:The only appropriate response by Hyperhaplo · · Score: 1

      The implication is that he is sending someone to hell for a short amount of time, and yes, they will be back, and will go there again..

      Eg, sending someone to work

      gosub work = gosub hell

      ?

      --
      You have a sick, twisted mind. Please subscribe me to your newsletter.
  7. Darn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But what do they really think this is going to accomplish, other than invention of a new vocabulary?

    1. Re:Darn by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It's actually a plot to boost telcom profits by selling more voice and data services. The new and increasingly creative(and disturbing) euphemisms will proliferate at such speed that it will soon be impossible to have even the remotest confidence that any given SMS message (even if checked for lewdness before sending) will not end up being blacklisted and dropped before delivery...

  8. Controlling communication helps controlling people by Hentes · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Don't you see that the whole aim of Newspeak is to narrow the range of thought?"

  9. Re:four twenty! by indeterminator · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's how the French say 80.

  10. OK wow by Baloroth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On the list: "harder". I can understand a**f****r, but "harder"? WTF? (also, they have IDIOT and ID1OT and IDOIT... but not 1D10T. Noobs.)

    Also on the list: lotion and period. Scientists with dry hands are gonna have some difficulties.

    --
    "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    1. Re:OK wow by Hentes · · Score: 1

      There is also 'cock fight' and 'cocktail'. I guess they just copied every word from a dictionary starting with 'cock'.

    2. Re:OK wow by Haedrian · · Score: 4, Funny

      It puts the ***** on its skin

    3. Re:OK wow by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Tampon is on the list as well as period.

      I'm guessing Pakistani women just fart some fairy dust every month then, no?

    4. Re:OK wow by Whiternoise · · Score: 2

      The list is clearly stolen from elsewhere. A quick Google of some of the more obscure phrases, such as "Purina Princess" yields this:

      http://outsports.com/nfl/2005/0301nflshopnaughtywords.htm

      Surely that's not a coincidence?

    5. Re:OK wow by sincewhen · · Score: 1

      You forgot to end your sentence with a ******.

      --
      -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    6. Re:OK wow by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

      But... idiot and moron are medical terms for very low IQ. (Or at least they were.)

  11. Re:four twenty! by Mr+Z · · Score: 2

    And Abe Lincoln.

    Something tells me, though, it refers to reefer in this context.

  12. What could possibly go wrong? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Has something that wasn't a terrible plan ever been implemented by people who use the phrase "consultations with stakeholders" with a straight face?

    1. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by mbkennel · · Score: 1

      Yes, actually, there's been some pretty fine plans implemented.

      hey flower chicka, i'd love to incent your totally awesome consultations with my stakeholder.

    2. Re:What could possibly go wrong? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Was dialoging with my stakeholder a win-win for you too, Anonymous Coward?

  13. And this is one way language evolves by oakgrove · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is fucking stupid for one simple reason.

    Kids and adults alike will just find new ways to say "beat your meat" "go to hell" or whatever in 3..2..1

    The censors cannot possibly hope to keep up.

    --
    The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    1. Re:And this is one way language evolves by will_die · · Score: 1

      What "flogging the dolphin" and "feed the duck" are not obscure enough?

    2. Re:And this is one way language evolves by oakgrove · · Score: 2

      Heh...much more interested in rocking the little man in the boat!

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    3. Re:And this is one way language evolves by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      The censors cannot possibly hope to keep up.

      Perhaps they fully understand this and that is all part of the plan, with the eventual goal to ban it completely.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:And this is one way language evolves by camperdave · · Score: 2

      The censors cannot possibly hope to keep up.

      Don't think of it as not being able to keep up. Think of it as job security.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  14. Woefully ineffective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And yet "Aw yeah, shoot your hot creamy load all over my face" would get through just fine.

    1. Re:Woefully ineffective by Haedrian · · Score: 3, Informative

      228. Creamy.

      No it won't. On the other hand neither will positive comments about icecream.

  15. Banned: Juggalo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Some of the banned words are amusing for various reasons. Some have fairly obvious explicit meanings, others do not. Some examples of messages that will be banned after this goes into effect:

    "I am putting a new roof on my house and the stringer length is 18 feet."
    "Did you see the new wuutang clan movie on netflix?"
    "When using distance measuring equipment in aircraft, it measures the slant length between the VOR and the aircraft."
    "When approaching to land, you should retard the throttle abeam the intended landing point."
    "I want to go land at Bremerton Airport, IACO identifier PWT."
    "When running long distances, you should be careful of joint pain in your knees."
    "Calculus is often considered to be a harder class than algebra."
    "Juggalo fatso got jesus" * (All words in this one are banned)

    Wow. This is good stuff. I often wonder what is going on in these people's heads when they come up with lists like this. They are not sane as we know it.

  16. And the irony is... by wjcofkc · · Score: 5, Funny

    In my original attempt to post I wrote "It's for the children!." in all caps in order to communicate the absurdity to those on Slashdot who don't always think things through and might actually take me seriously. I received the following error: Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

    Come on Slashdot, isn't that what we have moderation for?

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  17. Not looking good by wasimkadak · · Score: 1

    This is going to seriously dent the Pakistani vocabulary!

  18. That would block all my messages! by syousef · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just last month I sent a text to my boss that read...

    "Hey, monkey crotch! How's your atheletes foot? Any looser? Damn! Quit beating your meat and call idiot!"

    And to my wife...

    "Tired of flogging the dolphin? Let's fornicate!"

    And she replied

    "Go to hell!"

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:That would block all my messages! by MimeticLie · · Score: 1

      Who says he was suggesting they do it with each other? Might be why she's mad.

  19. Is this technically feasible? by B1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was thinking about this the other day as a technical challenge.

    Assuming their SMS system handles tens of thousands of texts per second, each of which needs to be tested against this user-definable dictionary of 1600 words, is it even possible for the platform to keep up? Are there sophisticated search / pattern matching algorithms for testing a message against 1600 substrings? I can think of a very naive way to do this, but I'm sure it would not scale.

    How would one implement this kind of high-speed pattern matching??

    1. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Mr+Z · · Score: 5, Informative

      What, you think they're going to do this on a Commodore 64?

      I looked it up, and folks in the US send 80 billion SMSes per month. That works out to about 30k SMSes/sec on average across the entire United States. Now, I realize that certain times of day are more likely to have SMSes than others, so let's say, to a first order, the peak rate of SMSes is 100k/sec. Now divide that among all the cell towers, understanding that some will be busier than others.

      Let's say a given cell tower has to process 100 SMSes a second, each at the full 160 character limit. That's 16kB/s. Let's say each word take 1000 cycles to test for, which should be on the high side since it assumes you can't use, say, a trie to take advantage of common word roots, or use pattern matching accelerators (which are quite common in this space). 16kB/s * 1000 * 1600 = 25.6Gcyc/sec. That sounds like a lot, but it isn't.

      A single board in one of these cellular base stations has literally dozens of processor chips, most with multiple cores, running in the GHz range. And that's just one board. My employer sells a chip in this space which crunches away 10Gcyc/sec across all of its 8 processors, and our customers put dozens of these on each board.

      On GSM networks, SMSes are control channel messages. They go via a low bandwidth side channel that is nowhere near as compute-intensive as the main voice channel. If you're provisioned to handle a certain number of phone calls, you're more than adequately provisioned to handle SMSes and the corresponding filtering, as long as you do the filtering at the base station.

    2. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      BTW, I realize this is Pakistan that we're talking about, not the US. I just used the US numbers to get an initial order of magnitude to get in the ball park for the number of SMSes/sec a given cell tower might see, on the presumption that a cell tower in the US has a similar amount of work to do per subscriber as a cell tower in Pakistan.

    3. Re:Is this technically feasible? by khipu · · Score: 1

      Routing those SMSes to their destinations requires much more complex pattern matching than that.

    4. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Alef · · Score: 1

      It would be trivially solvable using a trie. 10000 messages is only 1,6 million characters even if every message has the maximum length. Even your typical smart phone processor could probably manage that throughput.

    5. Re:Is this technically feasible? by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      hardware accel.

      its how routers do DPI these days.

      any real firewall worth anything has hardware support for string finding, substrings, etc.

      since routing is now 'boring' and its all worked out; the new hotness is to have 'apps' run on high speed router platforms and 'do things' at realtime speeds with your data.

      now, aren't you sorry you asked?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    6. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Alef · · Score: 1

      That's 16kB/s. Let's say each word take 1000 cycles to test for, which should be on the high side since it assumes you can't use, say, a trie to take advantage of common word roots, or use pattern matching accelerators (which are quite common in this space [google.com]). 16kB/s * 1000 * 1600 = 25.6Gcyc/sec.

      I'd say being on the high side there is a bit of an understatement. Using a trie, as you suggest, you'd probably be able to check a typical word against the entire dictionary less than 100 cycles, so your estimate is probably overshooting by four or five orders of magnitude.

    7. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Nysul · · Score: 1

      You seem to think the US government isn't already doing something like this, automatically searching for and reporting terrorist/anarchist/militia keywords.

    8. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my point was mainly to demonstrate that even if you turn all the knobs to 11, it's still easily doable.

    9. Re:Is this technically feasible? by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      That's what a compressed trie effectively does. Knuth, TAOCP III, pp 492ff.

    10. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Kalriath · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Cell tower? Why wouldn't you run all this on the considerably more powerful SMSCs?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    11. Re:Is this technically feasible? by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      *shrug* Probably. My main point was that there's a ton of compute power lying between any two endpoints of an SMS, and that the magnitude of the problem (grepping for 1600 bad words) is very, very, very small compared to that, even if you absurdly overestimate the cost by several orders of magnitude.

    12. Re:Is this technically feasible? by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      Unrelated, but thanks for finally giving a name to the data structure that a friend and I came up with at Uni to generate anagrams quickly. We both knew that it wasn't anything earth-shattering, but neither of us knew what to call it either. I think we ended up calling it an alphabet tree or something.

    13. Re:Is this technically feasible? by ap7 · · Score: 1

      Also, remember that an SMS is not real time communication like a voice call. A small delay, introduced by filtering, in transmission of the SMS to the recipient will probably not be noticed at all. There are other bottlenecks in a cellular network that cause such delays in any case.

  20. At least they have a public list. by I'm+Not+There+(1956) · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here in Iran messages are censored but nobody knows for which words. It's not even consistent: when there's going to be a protest event or news the filtering increases. Normally it filters less words. People guess these words. The worst happens for advertisers and advertising companies that send bulk SMS and later find out that nothing has delivered!

    --
    "If fifty million people say a foolish thing, it's still a foolish thing."
    1. Re:At least they have a public list. by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      ...The worst happens for advertisers and advertising companies that send bulk SMS and later find out that nothing has delivered!

      If that really is the worst that happens, I applaud the Iranian government for their discovery of successful anti-spam measures. (However, I suspect that their censorship policy has worse effects than blocking advertising campaigns)

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:At least they have a public list. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The worst happens for advertisers and advertising companies that send bulk SMS and later find out that nothing has delivered!

      Thanks a lot, bastard, now I have to reconsider my opposition to setting up a totalitarian theocratic regime and pervasive censorship apparatus!

    3. Re:At least they have a public list. by data2 · · Score: 1

      Same thought crossed my mind. In Germany, it's completely forbidden I guess, because I never received a single spam SMS in the 10+ years of use.

  21. all i can picture by decora · · Score: 5, Funny

    is a bunch of middle aged bureaucratic dudes sitting around a table saying "What do you think about "Monkey dick".. should we ban that?"

    1. Re:all i can picture by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Priceless :)

      I'm seeing a Monthy Python sketch in the making :)

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
  22. WooHoo ... by ProfM · · Score: 2

    I learned a few new swear words today. On a side note, why are 1072, 1073, and 1074 redacted? Are they too obscene?

  23. More list forensics by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 5, Informative

    - "Beastiality" is banned, but not "bestiality". Coitus with animals is acceptable as long as you can spell it properly.

    - A lot of superstrings seem to be banned; I guess they expect the operators to censor the longest possible match.

    - I guess no one's allowed to do research on HSV in Pakistan, since "herpes" is banned.

    - How long before someone turns the blocking of "lesbian" and "gay" into a human rights issue? Especially "gay pride"?

    - Some of these bans are actually dangerous to public safety: "sniper", "hostage", and "stroke" are all being banned.

    --
    Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    1. Re:More list forensics by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      - How long before someone turns the blocking of "lesbian" and "gay" into a human rights issue? Especially "gay pride"

      In muslim countries, they have no gays.

    2. Re:More list forensics by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that, according to this there's no woman oppresion either.

    3. Re:More list forensics by indeterminator · · Score: 1

      Duh.. mispasted the link. http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=3642673

    4. Re:More list forensics by fnj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Human rights? In a muslim theocracy? BWAHAHAHAHA!

    5. Re:More list forensics by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Human rights? In an Abrahamic theocracy? BWAHAHAHAHA!

      FTFY.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:More list forensics by devent · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why you assume that this theocracy is special only because it's a Muslim theocracy? We all know what was happening in a Christianity theocracy, and it's not better.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
  24. ask the people in prison in China by decora · · Score: 2

    who are there because they tweeted some small phrase or something.

  25. Thank goodness! by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

    Bad words are bad because I said so. I don't like them, and so they should be banned.

    Think of all the children that are being saved!

    --
    Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  26. oh god mod up by decora · · Score: 1

    hahahaha awesome

  27. US needs a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The US needs to get a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan.

    This has gone to far, we need to bring freedom back to the world. Only way to do this is for the US to get a set of BALLS and Liberate countries like Pakistan and Canada.

    1. Re:US needs a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan by thht · · Score: 1

      BEEEP YEAH!

    2. Re:US needs a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Canada needs to become the 51st state. No liberation!!

    3. Re:US needs a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      Not gonna happen, Pakistan has nukes. US doesn't attack countries with nukes, that's why Iran and North Korea try to get them.

    4. Re:US needs a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "The US needs to get a set of BALLS and Liberate Pakistan."

      If you mean by that "help India erase it with a pre-emptive first strike after the Taliban take over" I agree.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  28. Entertaining list by Teun · · Score: 1
    A very entertaining and instructive list, I didn't realise my English vocabulary had so many holes :)

    Weird that Jesus Christ is on the list, after Mohammed he is Islam's second most important prophet.
    Difficult when you are a plumber and need to order 1/2" NPT nipples...
    A Pakistani Big Bitch must be huge, she's 2x on the list :)

    Now Pakistan is a country of many languages so I wonder if there are, besides this English one, comparable lists for the others?

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    1. Re:Entertaining list by BluBrick · · Score: 1

      I thought that about Jesus, but then I remembered being taught that Christ is a title, not a name. Jesus is permitted in the Islamic context, but not in the Christian. So, is it weird that Jesus Christ is on the list? Meh, not really. Oppressive? Fuck, yeah!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
    2. Re:Entertaining list by Teun · · Score: 1

      Title vs. name, a good point!

      --
      "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
    3. Re:Entertaining list by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Or a ballcock...

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  29. deeper? by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Umm i suppose that means something different over there than it does in the states?

    Or are they really that idiotic? ( oh wait, i guess this post will be banned too... )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  30. Re:ROFL by masternerdguy · · Score: 1

    Maybe they think you might be able to get it from locker rooms while flogging the dolphin?

    --
    To offset political mods, replace Flamebait with Insightful.
  31. Re:four twenty! by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

    Most of them. But in some regions, as well as in Switzerland, they're sensible enough to use septante/huitante/nonante instead of that vigesimal crap.

  32. look at some of the stuff they banned by CreamyG31337 · · Score: 1

    STUPID
    NIGER (the country??)
    KOTEX
    SEX
    VAGINA
    TONGUE
    SUCK
    HOSTAGE
    UTERUS
    SNIPER
    SNOT
    SIX SIX SIX (yeah cuz someone is gonna spell out numbers?? why not ban 666 then)
    SCREW
    SHOWTIME
    ROBBER
    RETARDED
    CRAP
    CREAMY
    DIKE
    DEVIL
    DRUNK
    GAY
    HARDER
    JOINT
    PEE
    PERIOD
    OUI
    NAKED
    NIG
    OU812
    POOP
    PREMATURE
    PUSSY CAT
    REAR END
    SLAVE
    STROKE
    TROJAN
    TWO ON ONE
    WUUTANG (???)
    WHITE TRASH (is this a problem over there??)

    1. Re:look at some of the stuff they banned by Starteck81 · · Score: 1

      WHITE TRASH (is this a problem over there??)

      It probably is. I imagine it would be used to describe idiot Americans. Think of all the tech support calls they get.

      --
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed H
    2. Re:look at some of the stuff they banned by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You're sending history lessons as SMS text?

      You SHOULD be banned.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  33. I just learned some new words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But the main thing I think, as I peruse this list, is Fuck Pakistan. They seriously banned the word "dome". It's probably because such structures stand up too well to suicide bombing and thus more modern architecture is necessary to better enforce the will of Allah. They also spelled incest wrong. Ope, can't say "period". Can't say "premature".. Can't say "red light".. can't say "showtime".. they misspelled "wasted".. and you can't say "Got Jesus"... just how many Germans do they have over there? All in all, pakistani texting is now useless. The impending surge in encryption will give plausible deniability to terrorists the nation over, so the next time there's unrest, the government will collapse.

    1. Re:I just learned some new words by webminer · · Score: 1

      You got it wrong. Pakis are majority Sunnis and Iranians are majority Shiite. That's why most of middle east hates Iran. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Iraq are all Sunni majority.

  34. I applaud Pakistan by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... for doing everything they can to ensure that the range of Pakistani euphemisms and double-entendres expands to ever newer and more creative territory. Let a thousand flowers bloom!

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:I applaud Pakistan by halivar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let a thousand flowers bloom!

      That's just sick, you bastard.

  35. Re:Jesus Christ by SeNtM · · Score: 1

    There is no freedom in any country...only the illusion of it. In the US, our founders where aware of this and several of them were supporters of complete government dismantlement at various intervals.

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom." -George W. Bush
  36. Re:Easy to get around and disrupted by mysidia · · Score: 4, Informative

    /* badpatterns[1599] = '7H3PT45UX' */
    for(p=text,p2=buffer;*p;p++) { if (!isspace(*p)) *p2++ = LEETMAP(*p); }
    for(i=0;i<1600;i++) {
    result = pcre_exec(badpatterns[i].regex, 0, buffer, strlen(buffer), 0, 0, optvec, sizeof(optvec)/sizeof(optvec[0]));
    if ( result >= 0) {
    national_database[ subscriber_id ].strikes ++;
    (* badpatterns[i].punitive_action) ( national_database[ subscriber_id ].strikes, &gps_position[ subscriber_id], buffer, DISPATCH_POLICE);
    return MSG_BLOCKED;
    }
    }

  37. Curiouser and curiouser by banda · · Score: 2

    I too would like to pretend that the XFL never existed, but ban people from texting "HEHATEME"? Is Rod Smart THAT controversial in Pakistan?

  38. Rot13 by Rootkit · · Score: 1

    Easier than encryption, and likely to scramble a text enough to avoid all filters. There's probably an app for it.

  39. Hitler did it in the name of the Children as well. by Avarist · · Score: 1

    I usually dislike it when Hitler gets used to compare things but I'm going to do it anyway. Hitler did it in the name of the Children as well, he said so himself. You can do great evil and get away with it as long as you're doing it "to protect the innocent young".

    --
    In Capitalist US, the commerce controls the Government.
  40. Re:Jesus Christ by Z00L00K · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What you do is to give people a lot of freedom somewhere while you take it away in other places.

    And when people aren't good behaving citizens then you pepper spray them.

    Freedom is what you think you have, reality is that you may be free to express what you think in the western world but as soon as you act upon your opinions to get others to listen then you are a danger to the order.

    --
    If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
  41. Language evolution by Roogna · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Of course the most pointless thing with language bans and censorship of this kind is that it's exactly why we -have- so many double entendres and such. Every time a culture, religion, politician, parent, teacher, whomever, tells someone that saying something is offensive, the best they usually manage is the creation of some other way of stating the same thing. Even if that involves making up new words. Beyond that, the very children who everyone is usually trying to protect with language bans like this, are the absolute masters at creating new words to circumvent such things.

  42. Step Two by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    2. find the people who initiate changes in vocabulary by tracking messages from source 3. Subvert or kill them 4.???

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  43. Only in English ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wonder if they only will ban this list and words in English, how about the same words (meanings I mean) in their language ? are they banned too ?

    1. Re:Only in English ? by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Its in the f[message banned]

  44. Re:Banned: Juggalo by smellotron · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your circle of friends has much higher standards for texting content than mine.

  45. And the ninjas win... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    From the list: Ass Pirate
    No Ass Ninja.

    1. Re:And the ninjas win... by dlingman · · Score: 1

      Ass Ninja _is_ on the list - you just can't see it. (It is a Ninja after all.)

  46. B33t yur m33t.

    See? It still gets through.

  47. Agreed, stop the hate, because this is a good move by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After all, don't people realize the horrible things that can happen when someone gets offended?

    I found this documentary about the terrible consequences of being offended. It recounts the gruesome details of people who have been offended, went to sleep, and woke up the next morning with leprosy.

    It's good that Pakistan is stopping these atrocities before they get out of hand.

  48. Re:four twenty! by mangu · · Score: 1

    A French guy once told me they abolished "septante" in France in shame after their defeat to Germany in World War 0 in 1870.

  49. This is how 1337 sp33k got started by Nimey · · Score: 1

    Now we'll have annoyingly illiterate Pakistani youth.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  50. It's a well studied problem by mdmkolbe · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With a maximum character length of 140 characters, 1600 strings to match, and assuming 8 character long strings, it would take 140*8*1600=1,792,000 character matches per message if you do it naively. That is only a millisecond on modern GHz processors, but when processing large numbers of messages using embedded processors, that is probably a few more cycles than you want to spend on each message. You can do better by using Knuth-Morris-Pratt or Boyer-Moore. Since we can pre-process the strings to be matched, this means it takes only 140*1600*k=224,000*k (for some k determined by the algorithm). This is better, but not by much.

    Notice that the dominant factor is the 1600 strings to be matched. If you really care about performance, then you want to get rid of that factor. Simplest way is to build a finite-state automaton. If it is encoded as an NFA, the performance won't be much better than before, but if you encode it as a DFA, then each message can be processed in only 140 table lookups. The downside of this is the size of the lookup tables. In the worse case, expect them to take terabytes of space depending on the particular 1600 strings being matched.

    There are algorithms like Rabin-Karp and Aho-Corasick that might take less space while still taking only ~140 character operations. The practical answer, is to try DFA, RK, and AC to see which, if any, don't require too much preprocessing space, and then use one of those. The space requirements will depend on the particular text involved, but there are good odds that the tables for DFA will be small, and even better odds that the tables for RK and AC will be small.

    Searching and sorting are two of the most well studied algorithmic problems in computer science. If you ever find yourself wondering how to do them efficiently, there is a good chance that very smart people have already figured out how to do it.

    1. Re:It's a well studied problem by epine · · Score: 1

      Notice that the dominant factor is the 1600 strings to be matched. If you really care about performance, then you want to get rid of that factor.

      True, but why did you launch directly into automata? A hash-based bloom filter k=1 which tests each word against a bit vector of 8KB (64kbit) in size (L1 friendly) will flag roughly one false positive out of every 40 words (p=1600/2^16) for further testing. On the first true positive, the algorithm terminates, so this does not contribute to asymptotic run time. Depending on your CPU, the bloom filter might cost up to twenty instructions per character processed including amortized detection of word boundaries.

      Then you need to include additional processing triggered by 2% of words evaluated which can also be done with efficient hash methods (likely using larger non-L1 data structures). If you haven't banned any 1 or 2 character words, you can skip these completely. The second phase processing won't add up to much.

      Note that you should use a randomized hash function so that there is no predictable worst-case message available to miffed DOSers if you think this is a task worth doing well. This costs you at initialization time (dynamic instead of static bitvector), but is free thereafter.

      The easiest dodge for the person writing the message is to replace every space with an infrequent character such as 'z' if the words are hard to read written with no spaces at all. Or you can go full camel case. If the rule for what determines a word boundary becomes shifty, you're into full-blown spam filter hell. Of course, in such a country, shifty word boundaries could cost you your left one, so parse prudishly if you value your thumbs.

    2. Re:It's a well studied problem by mdmkolbe · · Score: 1

      True, but why did you launch directly into automata?

      Because I overlooked the fact that the words are delimited by spaces. Let me reanalyze the problem. (Yes, I do this kind of thing for fun.)

      Once you split messages into words, all matches are exact matches instead of searching for something in the middle of the string. In that case, as you say, hashes may do the job better since you don't need the extra power than automata give you.

      On the other hand, depending on whether you are optimizing for CPU time vs memory accesses, tries might do better than a hash (and have no false positives that require a second level of scanning). For 1600 words, the space to store the trie should be quite small (
      With a trie, you can also integrate the process of splitting up the message into the trie matching algorithm by making the 'space' edges point back to the root of the trie. If you do that, you end up with a deterministic automaton (which is probably also minimal) that takes less than 13KB to store.

      • Costs of hash:
        • n linear, cold memory reads (reading message);
        • n character compares against a constant (space finding);
        • k*n math ops (hash computation);
        • ~n/8 (one per word) random, hot memory reads (bloom table lookup).
      • Cost of trie:
        • n linear, cold memory reads (reading message);
        • n random, hot memory reads (trie table lookup).

      Which of those is better comes down to whether k*n math ops are cheaper or more expensive than n table lookups. On an embedded CPU that answer is going to be different than on a desktop GHz CPU. However, all of that having been said, the bloom-filter has an important advantage: it can be tuned to handle larger sets of words in exchange for a larger false positive rate. (The trie would be less susceptible to DOS, but I don't think that is likely to be a major consideration.)

      Conclusion: It was stupid of me to over look the space delimiters. Without knowing more about the performance characteristics of the target platform, it is difficult to determine for certain which one will perform better, but I agree that Bloom-filters are a good idea and are likely to do a better job than automata.

  51. Re:ROFL by haruchai · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They have a very inflated view of themselves, which is reflected in their country's name - Pakistan means Land of the Pure.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  52. We had our own troubles with the PTA by dynamo · · Score: 1

    They're always out trying to censor everything. Screw them!

  53. Re:ROFL by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

    Imagine Kansas with nuclear weapons,

    truly, a point of know return.

    (been waiting *decades* to use that joke. NOW, what do I do?)

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  54. Pakistani XFL fans by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

    #494 on the list, He Hate Me. Who knew the Pakistani government had so many XFL fans?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  55. hostage? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

    "Hostage"? There are going to be a lot of pissed off Al Qaeda in Pakistan. "We have been waiting two weeks for the ransom on this journalist, why won't they reply to our texts!"

  56. Good and bad by meta-monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    After reading the list, there are some good and bad parts:

    Good: #575 - Juggalo. ICP fans should be banned, everywhere.

    Bad: #657 - Master Blaster. Now how will Pakistanis know who rules Bartertown?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Good and bad by anilg · · Score: 1

      Wow.. Master blaster is a nickname of one of India's (and this generation's) leading cricketer, Sachin Tendulkar. This list also goes into personal sport tastes?

      --
      http://dilemma.gulecha.org - My philospohical short film.
  57. Some more things came to mind by Lord+Lode · · Score: 1

    3) Why are combinations of two words on the list, where one of the two is also on the list already? The combination would already be banned due to that single word.

    4) Why is "dome" on the list? You can't even describe a building with a dome?

  58. Re:ROFL by MurukeshM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When the countries split, most things were split - wealth, population, what have you. But the amount of stupidity was duplicated.

  59. Re:ROFL by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Informative

    In India, showing your bare feet to someone is extremely offensive. There are similar traditions in Pakistan so it probably is part of an insult of some sort. Just a guess though.

  60. It's like a one time pad... by shippers · · Score: 1

    I could find some uses for this list.

  61. The smarter government by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    I'm sure they anticipated that... that's why the 1600 word/phase list is probably 1600 variants of the phrase "F**** the PTA" or "The Pakistan Telecom authority sucks"

    One would hope the lawmakers used regex to define the forbidden terms.

    On second thought, perhaps it's better not to let lawyers know about the power of regex.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:The smarter government by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Better not. How many words would 'ass*' take out? The list is so badly constructed that they would take out half the words in the dictionary, since you know they would somehow manage to use regex incorrectly.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:The smarter government by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, I have very limited knowledge of the Pakistani language (well, I have zero knowledge of it), but if it is in any way close to any other language I know, the "bad" words tend to be short. Think of a few select words you wouldn't say in the presence of your mother and count their average letters. What average do you end up with? 4? 5? Something like that, I'd bet.

      Can you imagine what trying to regex all the various creative ways to spell them would net you? Exactly. A regex expression that fits nearly all words in the English language.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  62. No one is in prison for that by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Ask the Americans in US prisons because they tweeted or texted some small phrase or something.
    Things like "I am going to assassinate the president, come help me rednecks".

    Nice moral equivalency asshole.

    Real people are getting arrested, tortured and killed in China for saying far less than that.

    Meanwhile in the U.S. you just said you were going to assassinate the president, which you threw around because you know nothing would happen.

    If you repeatedly posted it to twitter for months on end, you MIGHT get a visit from the secret service. MIGHT.

    Stop pretending two drastically different situations are the same as you shame the whole western world with your cavalier dismissal of dissidents as being the same as some random U.S. crackpot. They are fighting for a real cause and you are curb-stomping them, however inadvertently...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  63. ok. ask Cheng Jianping by decora · · Score: 1

    im not talking about a fantasy of where we might be in 10 years. im talking about actual, real people sitting in jail in china, right now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cheng_Jianping
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_dissidents

  64. Grimly Amusing by Hasai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems no matter where you go and no matter how ludicrous the subject, "IT'S FOR THE CHIIIILLLLDREN!" always wins. :\

    --

    Regards;

    Hasai

  65. Stolen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Shamelessly stolen from the NFL "naughtyword" list?

    http://outsports.com/nfl/2005/0301nflshopnaughtywords.htm

    Two lists with "Purina Princess" can't be that common, now can it?

    1. Re:Stolen? by statsone · · Score: 1

      so did the authority just copy the list or is it a joke?

  66. computer euphemisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Testing the dongle?

  67. Some horrible words I don't want my kids to see by chrismcb · · Score: 1

    athletes foot, backdoor, backseat, blackout, deeper, devil, dome, fairy, finger food, glazed donut, hole, hostage, k mart, lotion, lube job, penthouse, period, quickie, rear end, ribbed, roach, robber, screw, slant, slime

    Heaven forbid if your name is Mary Jane.

    ass is illegal, gay is illegal... but just to be sure "gay ass" is also illegal

    fourtwenty is a nono, but I guess it is ok to use 420.

  68. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  69. Subjective, I guess by Tarlus · · Score: 1

    'Nobody would like this happening to their young boy or girl.'

    Quite frankly, I would not be at all phased if somebody simply texted the phrase "athlete's foot" to my daughter.

    --
    /* No Comment */
  70. Re:Easy to get around and disrupted by digitig · · Score: 1

    I once had an email bounced (by the recipient's UK ISP) because the contents were "obscene". The contents? Matthew Arnold's poem Dover Beach. Content of that link NSFW, it seems. At least according to that ISP.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  71. Troublesome words by poena.dare · · Score: 2

    I was going to put every word on the list in a poem, but words #1072 to 1074 are impossible to rhyme.

    1. Re:Troublesome words by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      Ever see the movie "Pooty Tang?"
      He uses those words in his newest song.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:Troublesome words by poena.dare · · Score: 1

      Kudos! Excellent reference. My hat's off to you, sir or madam!

  72. Dickidydick by mrops · · Score: 1

    still not on the list

    dikidydick dickidydick dickidydick

  73. Word in Urdu by mrops · · Score: 1

    They totally ignored cuss words in their native language, Its more likely to hear "gand-du" for "fag" than the word "fag".

    Or for that matter "run-dy" for "whore"

    or "lund" for penis

    1. Re:Word in Urdu by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      TFA said that there are two lists, one in English and one in Urdu. The article only links to the English list, so the Urdu list may include those words you mentioned.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  74. Re:four twenty! by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    Yet another instance of Belgian superiority.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  75. Re:Banned: Juggalo by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    Is the english list translated from the URDU list? Perhaps the URDU list doesn't have words with such dual meanings as 'screw' and 'period'.

  76. No more embarrassing moments in checkout line by NeoMorphy · · Score: 1

    Personally, I have no problem with "Honey, can you pick up some tampons for me?", but some guys hate this. Now they can claim that darn censorship, they blocked it out, so I assumed you were asking me to pick up some beer.

  77. Re:ROFL by Billlagr · · Score: 1

    ESPECIALLY if you have a foot fungal growth!

  78. Fake? by hipp5 · · Score: 1

    Are we sure this isn't fake? I mean, is "beat your meat" really a phrase that also exists in Urdu? Or is English just that popular there?

  79. Re:ROFL by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    Tom Lehreh got it right in Who's Next, with Alabama.

  80. Beware ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... of the New Word Order!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  81. Political context. by iiiears · · Score: 1

    A memo was leaked a few days ago. ("memogate") The Pakistan civilian government already unpopular for alignment with the west. asked the U.S. to do something about the Pakistan military gaining more power.
      SOPA is in U.S. congress/senate.
    Was network censorship in a country with many more pressing needs part of an agreement for our help?

    --
    15TW = 15,000 Nuclear Reactors. (Approx. one accident a month.)
  82. Re:ROFL by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

    As someone I know once said, never project your cultural views on another nation. Meaning, they will never view or treat you the same way in which you do. Pakistan had better be careful whom they piss off. India is mainly Hindu. They wouldn't have the compunction to force an entire nation to take another spin at the wheel of life. Of all the nations on Earth, a conflict between those two could easily go Nuclear in a hurry.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
  83. Re:Jesus Christ by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

    "Let the Bhudda guide you to enlightenment." Is fine on the list. Infact if you look at the list, it's only Christian religious stuff that is banned (and a tiny bit of Jewish in using the same terminology for God).

  84. Re:ROFL by asto21 · · Score: 1

    Not really. Regardless of how stupid they are, Pakistanis don't really want to die. India could wipe out Pakistan in a nuclear war significantly faster than they can take us out. What is worrying though is that China is giving them a hand with their military arsenal. Without their help, I wouldn't be surprised if Pakistan blows itself up with its weapons. It is what they're usually good at, no? :-D But all speculation apart, I really hope it doesn't come down to a nuclear (or any) war.

  85. Re:four twenty! by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    And Abe Lincoln.

    Something tells me, though, it refers to reefer in this context.

    A Gettysburg Address joke? Why not, we are nerds here.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  86. Re:ROFL by asto21 · · Score: 1

    No, it's not. People often confuse India as some sort of homogenous territory as far as culture is concerned. Traditions can vary greatly between different areas of the country. Personally, I have yet to meet someone here who is offended by my feet. o_0

  87. Re:ROFL by trojjan · · Score: 2

    I've been India all my life and never heard that. In fact in most places of worship(temples etc.) you are required to remove your foot wear and go bare feet, thus exposing them.

  88. Decimating vocabulary by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    It occurred to me that 1600 unique words would be close to 10% of man people's working, day-to-day vocabulary.

    (Cue: jokes about being 60% or more of some people's vocabulary)

    On the plus side, the vocabulary list repeats a lot. On the minus side, entire messages (may?) get lost if a forbidden word gets used.

    And another thing, that I find quite interesting: The list is English. I had not known that English is one of two "official languages" of Pakistan.

    Perhaps they are trying to encourage the makers of Urdu porn?

  89. Re:Jesus Christ by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Is forbidden, even without f inbetween. There's just no freedom in muslim countries.

    This is to stop discussuins of christianity, which they see as offensive.

  90. If only we used English Curses in the First place! by ryzvonusef · · Score: 3, Informative

    The weird thing is, we don't text in English! We "txt" a bizarre 1337 Roman Urdu, with lavish sprinkling of punjabi curse words.

    Awesome language, that Punjabi, it has both, some of the very best poetry *and* curses.

    So yeah, our dear president, we will still continue to crude messages about you, good luck stopping us. (I could swear one in ten messages is something disparaging about the president, given my inbox)

    This is, of course, if the list *is* real. First of all, it's unlikely PTA would have revealed it, and secondly, I don't think they would dare censor something like Jesus Christ. All the churches would be in uproar, and the Supreme court would rip them a new one.

    (*BTW*, just to give an idea, Pakistan has one the highest rates for text messaging in the world. We have six companies offering extremely competitive sms packages, and we don't have incoming charges bullshit that you have there, so good luck filtering those tens of millions of messages sent every day.)

    --
    I am an ACCA student. Got a query on Accountancy/Finance? Maybe I can help!
  91. Re:Didn't work for Disney by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    Disney's Virtual Magic Kingdom was an MMO with a word filter, restricting dialogue to a set number of clean phrases. Didn't take long for someone to come up with the phrase "I want to stick my long-necked Giraffe up your fluffy white bunny". Is Pakistan going to block those words too?

    yes.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  92. Re:Controlling communication helps controlling peo by PhiRo,oRihP · · Score: 1

    Pacsoc doubleplus good, texting clean unwords delete leads to goodthought and unthoughtcrime.

  93. Need to go read the list by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    While most of it is stuff you would expect, but here are some really dumb ones (deeper, idiot, drunk, deposit) and some funny ones (Dahmer(?), mother love bone(?!))

    Can you imagine if you tried this-
    I have to go *deposit* more money to make the *hole* *deeper* in the back yard that the *drunk* *idiot* messed up.

    I see where the phrases "back door" & "banging" can have a sexual connotation, but there are also a few other ways to use them, too. I must be too old to understand the controversy behind "cocky" and "cocktail."

    I'm also confused by TFA's explanation of how Pakistan has a free speech clause in it's constitution but somehow this is "not unrestricted?" I can understand China trying to stamp out political speech, but Pakistan looks like it's on a morality crusade that makes the extreme Bible-bangers in the US look tame. I do admit I have slim knowledge about Pakistan.

    (I really have to figure out a way to use "mother love bone" in a proper conversation with someone.)

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  94. Re:ROFL by schroedingers_hat · · Score: 1

    Yeah! How dare they plagarise the Torah like that!

  95. Pakistan is a bunch of PUSSIES by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    Is that banned?

    Look pakistan, if you really want to control your people, do what RA did in Stargate (orig movie) and just ban all writing and make your country all slaves.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  96. Re:Easy to get around and disrupted by shikaisi · · Score: 1

    Well how dare you send emails about naked shingles? You wanna know what I think? I think you're some kind of deviated prevert.

    --
    No left turn unstoned.
  97. Thanks! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    'flogging the dolphin.'

    I would like to express my gratitude to the Pakistani government for helping me extend and enrich my English vocabulari.

  98. Hoax? by ArizonaJer · · Score: 1
    Could this list be a hoax?

    It looks remarkably similar (down to the capitalization of words) to a list circulating since at least 2005 of words banned from NFL jerseys.

    See

    http://www.outsports.com/nfl/2005/0301nflshopnaughtywords.htm

    'Course, perhaps Pakistan just borrowed this list.

    --
    Jeremy Butler
    www.ScreenSite.org
    www.TVCrit.com
  99. LOL by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 1

    I just hope they banned "LOL".

    --
    "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
  100. Re:Banned: Juggalo by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    Pity you didn't bold the "offensive" words. I can't identify most of them.

  101. Re:If only we used English Curses in the First pla by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If it is, just take it as a shorthand version, you know, to save you text letters. I mean, there's nothing wrong with texting "Prez is a #1224", is there? :)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  102. Re:four twenty! by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    It is actually much older : the Académie française (founded in 1634) never accepted the "septante" form. It fact it is a strange mashup of a base-10 and a base-20 system.

  103. Re:Controlling communication helps controlling peo by Carnildo · · Score: 1

    Big Brother ungood.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  104. Who-o-o-osh by presidenteloco · · Score: 1

    In case you didn't notice, my post was constructed entirely out of banned in Pakistan words, of which "looser" was a prominently featured example, whereas "loser" was not. I'm perfectly aware of the difference between "looser" use of language in artistic license, and "loser" posts by speling polis posers.

    It saddens me that you also probably missed how my post **simply incredibly cleverly and deviously** spaced out the letters in the banned words to avoid filters. :-(

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  105. Well, FRAK! by ThinkDifferently · · Score: 1

    Hah, it's not on the list. I win.