Slashdot Mirror


Bluetooth Keyboards With a 10-Year Charge Promised

angry tapir writes "Broadcom is working on a Bluetooth chipset that will give wireless keyboards a battery life of up to 10 years. If they had a battery life of as long as 10 years, that Bluetooth-based accessories could potentially never need new batteries, the chip maker said. A set of two AA batteries would be enough to power a keyboard using the BCM20730 Bluetooth chip to connect with a computer for its entire lifetime, Broadcom said."

270 comments

  1. Ha! by RobinEggs · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hahaha...whew, that's a good one.

    Now tell me we're gonna have flying cars 'within the next 15-30 years'.

    1. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      We're gonna have flying cars 'within the next 15-30 years'

    2. Re:Ha! by VernonNemitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, as long as chips keep getting smaller and need less power, something like this is almost inevitable. However, at some point it will be possible to dispense with batteries altogether, and just build solar cells into the keyboard. If you have enough light to see it, then you will have enough light to run it. Someday, even your smartphone or tablet (or combined unit) will be built that way.

    3. Re:Ha! by geekoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Or generate tiny amount of electricity from the key press.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Ha! by sneakyimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. I call shenanigans. I doubt there's a commercially available AA battery that'll reliably keep its charge for 10 years, much less power something.

    5. Re:Ha! by Arrepiadd · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean one day in the future we'll be able to have one of these?

      Boy, can't wait...

    6. Re:Ha! by NFN_NLN · · Score: 2

      We're gonna have flying cars 'within the next 15-30 years'

      Technically the batteries will last 10 years, it just has an aggressive sleep mode!

      It goes to sleep after 0.5-0.75s of no activity and takes 2-3 seconds to wake up again :)

    7. Re:Ha! by the_other_chewey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. I call shenanigans. I doubt there's a commercially available AA battery that'll reliably keep its charge for 10 years, much less power something.

      My alarm clock (seven-segment hh:mm:ss display, radio controlled) is running on one single
      AA battery since at least late 2004, so it is going into its 8th+ year now. It is a completely standard
      1.5V AA cell made by TDK (or at least sold under their name).

      No, I haven't checked the battery for radiation yet. Yes, it is beginning to scare me a bit.

    8. Re:Ha! by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Sarcasm aside, i picked one of those up when Amazon had a sale, and i've been rather amazed. It was an impulse purchase without any prior research done. I figured with both Logitech and Amazon's names attached it couldn't be a complete scam, but i though i'd probably have to be careful to make sure to put it under bright light every so often to keep it charged up or something, or that the signal strength might be a little weak to compensate. Or something anyways, never having to replace the keyboard batteries again just seemed too good to be true, as trivial as that seems.

      In actuality the signal strength is fine, better than my wireless mouse certainly, and not once when i've thought to check has it been below full charge despite being kept in our regular living room lighting conditions, which can be pretty dim at times. One of the coolest bonuses is a button you can press to launch a light meter app on your computer, which will tell you the lux level the solar panels are currently being exposed to. It's been great fun to move the keyboard around and vary the lighting conditions to see how the value changes. It really brings home something everyone familiar with SF or photography is intellectually aware of, that the sun delivers a couple more magnitudes of light than we actually need to see comfortably with.

      They keyboard is also incredibly light and thin. My only complaints relate solely to the the way some of the keys and their functions are placed/handled, but that's pretty obviously an issue with design choices and nothing to do with the basic hardware. And despite those quibbles it's still leaps and bounds above my previous Microsoft keyboard. (Silly me, when i bought it online as the only wireless keyboard option for my PC package i was putting together i figured "it's just a keyboard, how badly can Microsoft screw it up?")

      Of course some people might not like the fact that it's not ergonomically shaped, but i prefer the old fashioned rectangular slabs :)

      I wonder if they could make a solar powered mouse to match? You'd have to use curved solar panels that didn't feel too weird while you were actually using the mouse...

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    9. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They do make lithium batteries in standard form factors, they just have different voltages.
      The smoke detectors in my house use lithium batteries with a 10 year lifespan. Since your supposed to replace the detectors every 10 years anyway they are set and forget. I never have to test them either because my Wife keeps setting them off while cooking.

    10. Re:Ha! by errandum · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think current battery technology lasts that long, especially store bought AA's.

    11. Re:Ha! by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Actually, the lithium AAs are only about 1.75V at full charge. I put some in my Nikon F4s back in `1999 or 2000, and it still works fine on the same set.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    12. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I made a LED fllashlight about 17 years ago with a single bright (for the time) red LED and two AAA batteries. I seldom used it, and the batteries lasted about 14 years. So alkaline batteries can have a long shelf life.

    13. Re:Ha! by gznork26 · · Score: 1

      An idea I first heard from Tom Digby at the Los Angeles Science Fantasy Society about 1980. Why not?

    14. Re:Ha! by crdotson · · Score: 1

      Kick ASS -- a nuclear powered keyboard!

    15. Re:Ha! by PRMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I actually called Duracell to tell them that a clock that I got with a very loud rooster alarm every day for 12 years finally quit working. The Duracell batteries came with the clock. They asked me if there was any leakage from the 12 year old batteries and sent me a coupon.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    16. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not even. Just shake it, using something similar to the self-winding mechanism in watches. All the movement from carrying it around would charge it enough to run all day.

    17. Re:Ha! by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they could make a solar powered mouse to match?

      I would LOVE it if they made one with a built-in trackpoint or touchpad (to control the computer on my TV from the couch), and neither of those requires powering a light source for the optical mouse, which would seemingly be a significant power draw.

      Although, the battery-powered wireless RF keyboard/touchpad I have now runs for months on 2 AAAs...

    18. Re:Ha! by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Keyboard battery life (months)... Infinity

      Excellent.. beyond the end of the universe.. but the keyboard will turn to dust shortly before then.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    19. Re:Ha! by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      If you have enough light to see it, then you will have enough light to run it.

      Ihmhi musn't light the bas- the PAINKEEP! The light, it BURNS us!

    20. Re:Ha! by timeOday · · Score: 2
      Energizer advertises a 15 year shelf life for their Ultimate Lithium AA.

      Timex makes several watches with an advertized battery life of 10 years.

      Besides, the battery doesn't particularly need to be in any standard form factor if it will never be replaced.

    21. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only it used Bluetooth instead of some insecure proprietary solution.

    22. Re:Ha! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Solar cells would be somewhat ugly, and dependent on light in the room. You'd prefer to use a coil in the desk, that would provide wireless power to the keyboard, the mouse, and the monitor (or monitors). If power consumption is low enough, efficiency is not an issue.

    23. Re:Ha! by erick99 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I have a 12 year old bathroom scale still running off of the original lithium battery that was factory installed. I am amazed at how long it has lasted. Lithium is, admittedly, a different beast than alkalines. But 12 years is pretty good for any battery.

      --
      http://www.busyweather.com/
    24. Re:Ha! by EdIII · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Logitech has a solar keyboard right now. Will run partially off the glow from a couple of LCDs. Normal light in the room is more than enough to run the device and keep a full charge. I have seen it run off low light levels too, like a 40w table lamp.

      Would rather have that than a magnetic field in my desk.

    25. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That model claims to use AES-128.

    26. Re:Ha! by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

      I don't think current battery technology lasts that long, especially store bought AA's.

      It's a good thing Amazon sells batteries with future technology then. ;-)

    27. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a remote control with the original AA batteries that came with it in 1999! Sure, it doesn't go that far anymore, and I sometimes have to shake it a bit. But they are still working.
      Although I have never seen that company sell batteries anywhere. (They are labeled as "maxell Super POWER ACE red" and made in Indonesia by Hitachi Maxell.)

      That remote is the weirdest thing anyway. It's a multi-device remote, but half the buttons are not mappable to anything but one device type. And the labels really don't fit the button locations / groupings.

    28. Re:Ha! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      The magnetic field produced would be extremely small, and with most (if not all) storage moving toward flash, you need not worry about your floppy disk or spinning media and said magnetic field.

    29. Re:Ha! by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      Energizer advertises a 15 year shelf life for their Ultimate Lithium AA.

      Shelf life and active life (for lack of a better word) are two completely different things.
      The shelf life refers to the rate at which the battery will self-discharge.
      The actual usefulness of the battery afterwards depends entirely on the chemistry and the application you intend for it.

      That particular lithium you referenced will last hours longer than most batteries, not years longer.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    30. Re:Ha! by caseih · · Score: 1

      I have had the same AA batteries in a remote control for my old stereo system for the last 12 years. I don't use the remote very often (maybe a couple of times a week).

    31. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When we come out with vibrators that the battery last 10 years with regular use -- then we will be onto something.

    32. Re:Ha! by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      That sounds unusable.

    33. Re:Ha! by sl149q · · Score: 3, Informative

      Literally if you have enough light to see the technology to harvest it and put it to good use for telemetry exists.... See Cymbet's paper on the design of an Intra Ocular Pressure Sensor here: http://www.cymbet.com/pdfs/eeweb-article.pdf. Something small enough to fit in your eye, report pressure wirelessly and last 10 years without a battery.

      From the paper:

      To extend lifetime, the IOPM harvests light energy
      entering the eye with an integrated 0.07 square millimeter
      solar cell that recharges the battery. Given the ultra-small
      solar cell size, energy autonomy requires average power
      consumption of less than 10nW. For the majority of its
      lifetime, the IOPM is in a 3.65nW standby mode where
      mixed-signal circuits are disabled, digital logic is powergated,
      and 2.4fW/bitcell SRAM retains IOP instructions
      and data. The average system power with pressure
      measurements every 15 minutes and daily wireless
      data transmissions is 5.3nW. When sunny, the solar cells
      supply 80.6nW to the battery. The combination of energy
      harvesting and low-power operation allows the IOPM
      to achieve zero-net energy operation in low light. The
      IOPM requires 10 hours of indoor lighting or 1.5 hours of
      sunlight per day to achieve energy-autonomy

      This would certainly be usable to keep something like a keyboard working forever with a solar cell that was barely noticeable.

    34. Re:Ha! by mwvdlee · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Couldn't the bluetooth chip be powered by utilizing the kinetic energy of a human pressing a button. Many people would actually prefer a bit of physical resistance in the buttons of a keyboard.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    35. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a 12 year old bathroom scale still running off of the original lithium battery that was factory installed. I am amazed at how long it has lasted.

      You've had a scale for 12 years without weighing yourself?

    36. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much a thing of of "liking" the ergonomic shape. It's more a thing of my pinkies tingling and becoming numb, which is a feeling that can drive one crazy, and definitely not healthy. ^^

      But your normal "ergonomic" keyboard just replaces the disadvantage of that with pain in your shoulders from keeping them at an angle.

      Then again, most so-called "ergonomic" keyboards have nothing to do with being ergonomic at all. Microsoft and Logitech are the worst at this. They make the space bar a bit bulgy in the front, make the key arrangement look a teeeny-tiny bit wavy, and call it "ergonomic".

      THIS is a proper ergonomic keyboard. Unfortunately, its price is beyond crazy. And it has a bit of a "Mice? Not invented here!" problem.

    37. Re:Ha! by Askmum · · Score: 1

      Why would it be funny? At home I have the very first pocket calculator (HP 35) and it uses three AA batteries and drains in about a day. At school I used a Casio FX-82 which, even with daily use, never needed a battery change and still works (granted, I don't use it that often anymore).

    38. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I figured with both Logitech and Amazon's names attached it couldn't be a complete scam,

      Amazon's name isn't attached to it. Amazon has no stake in whether it's any good or not, it's just one of umpteen places you happen to be able to purchase it from.

      I like the look of it. A shame it's about twice the price on amazon.co.uk than amazon.com, even allowing for sales tax differences.

    39. Re:Ha! by shikaisi · · Score: 1

      I wish my wife would stop posting AC.

      --
      No left turn unstoned.
    40. Re:Ha! by ColaMan · · Score: 2

      Check out EnOcean sometime.

      Wireless, kinetically powered switches, with up to 300 metres open-air range.

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    41. Re:Ha! by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Where do you think they would put the solar cell, that you hand wouldn't cover it up. Keyboards are fine, you can have the strip along the top, but not so for a mouse. Now, a mouse that is charged through magnetic induction, sitting on yep, an inductive mouse mat, would be a better option.

    42. Re:Ha! by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1

      I have a calculator that I got around 1984ish (Sharp EL-506P) and that's still running on it's original batteries! That probably says something about how much I use it, but I'm always amazed at the batteries (and the calculator itself for that matter) still working.

    43. Re:Ha! by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Dunno, how much do a laser led draw these days?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    44. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I was thinking of exactly the same thing. If you could get the power requirements down low enough, you could power it with a piezoelectric generator in a select key. Say the "space bar" or "e" or even return.

    45. Re:Ha! by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      You know, if I leave AA batteries just sitting in my drawar doing nothing, they die in about 2 years. How could using them make them last another 8 years?

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    46. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just think how long it will last when it's harvesting the energy from your fat ass stepping on it.

      doughnut powered cop cars.

      jr

    47. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would rather have that than a magnetic field in my desk.

      So you opted for a wireless keyboard?

    48. Re:Ha! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I wonder if they could make a solar powered mouse to match? You'd have to use curved solar panels that didn't feel too weird while you were actually using the mouse...

      Logitech has already got a mouse that lasts a year on one AA battery, so presumably they could do what you want, but it probably wouldn't be worth it. I can't use their solar keyboard anyway, because I have a multi-tier desk with a music keyboard above my keyboard keyboard.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    49. Re:Ha! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      That particular lithium you referenced will last hours longer than most batteries, not years longer.

      Amp-hours and hours are only equivalent if you draw an amp. Nice try, though.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    50. Re:Ha! by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      I swear I've seen Maxwell batteries somewhere. Maybe not the "Super POWER ACE red" variety, but I know that company has been state side at some point. I'm tempted to say either in the pharmacy in the previous town I lived in or some dollar store.

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
    51. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A little resistance may be okay up to a point. I just bought an Adesso wireless keyboard for my home theatre PC. It's one of the worst keyboards I've ever used simply because the keys are hard to press and I can't touch type without thinking about it. Keypresses are dropped not because of wireless, but because I often don't push on them hard enough. The laptop keyboard I just purchased with a chiclet keyboard I was worried about because the keys offered so little resistance. However, I've found on that I can type near my max of around 95 WPM, and sometimes it seems faster. Physical keyboards are best because they give you tactile feedback on where your fingers should be without looking at the keyboard, but based on my experience I think less resistance is better and more comfortable for typing.

    52. Re:Ha! by rotorbudd · · Score: 1

      That brings to mind the first TV remote that my family had. (This was around '65)
      The remote used 2 or 3 tuning forks for on-off, channel change, and volume. You could just hit it on the floor to get lots of strange responses from the TV!
      Can't remember the brand tho, maybe RCA?

      --
      A bullet may have your name on it, but artillery is addressed to " Whom It May concern"
    53. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here, but if it was an IBM Model M variant, all bets are off on the lifetime being just 10 years. They just don't break.

    54. Re:Ha! by tomboalogo · · Score: 1

      small rechargeable battery inside - easy peasy. This is probably how the keyboard works as well.

    55. Re:Ha! by tomboalogo · · Score: 1

      I'm worried about the 'floppy disk' in my pants.

    56. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a load of this guy - he called shenanigans.

    57. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is that keyboard twice as much on amazon uk?
      There are solar mice

    58. Re:Ha! by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Zenith Space Command.

    59. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience Duracell AAs leak less than Energizer AAs, but somehow Energizers are more popular here - stores/supermarkets stock them more than Duracells. You can get Duracells at pharmacies here though.

    60. Re:Ha! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      To me, that's not what's funny. What's funny is my old Logitech IR wireless keyboard stays alive for two years on two AAA carbon batteries. Why on earth would ten years be an improvement, especially if they're talking about an expensive battery? It only takes ten seconds to change them and they cost about fifty cents apiece.

      The mouse, now, that's a different story; batteries last about a month. It takes the same size batteries as the keyboard, but they're rechargable and recharge in the mouse's holder. Give me a cordless mouse that will work for two years (let alone ten) without recharging and I'll be impressed.

    61. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a few attempts, but look at your hand, then look at the mouse under your hand. Yup, that's why solar mice don't work as easily as solar keyboards.

    62. Re:Ha! by Gription · · Score: 1

      TVs with that style of remote were easy to mess with. You just had to shake a ring full of keys. Fun with technology...

    63. Re:Ha! by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      I can't believe I'd never considered this... you sir win my fucking genius idea of the day award.

      As you said that I realized that the apple BT keyboard I'm using at the moment has a nice cylindrical battery compartment that I might even be able to hack a shake-to-charge flashlight system into. I wonder if it'd hold enough charge.

    64. Re:Ha! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      I have no inside knowledge about how things work at Amazon, but i'm pretty sure they don't just pick their "deal of the day" items randomly. There's got to be some kind of selection process, and i suspect that such a process would catch an item that had a lot of complaints about fraud of any kind.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    65. Re:Ha! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      As long as you're not using your mouse for 100% of the daylight (or interior lighting) hours the idea is feasible.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    66. Re:Ha! by EdIII · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between the energy level of the Bluetooth radios on the keyboard and the one attached to the USB port on my monitor and a magnetic field capable of powering a monitor.

      Keep in mind, the poster said monitor(s) plural.

      Quite frankly, I don't see how anything would function with a field that strong. I would think it would interfere with the operation of the monitor, and the signals coming to the monitor.

    67. Re:Ha! by wooferhound · · Score: 1

      The magnetic field produced would be extremely small, and with most (if not all) storage moving toward flash, you need not worry about your floppy disk or spinning media and said magnetic field.

      What about my Credit Cards ?

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    68. Re:Ha! by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      As long as the magnetic field is under 1000 gauss, it should not cause any problems with your credit cards.

    69. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like not seeing my keyboard! thank you very much..jackass

    70. Re:Ha! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Dallas semi offered a 28 pin dip socket composed of a lithium battery and a controller. I know that one particular unit retained it's memory for 10 years without external power. It was in a unit that had some data on it we needed as it had been otherwise lost and someone found one in storage. We extracted the information with no problem. I don't know the chemistry of this particular lithium battery.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    71. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we should have them within 3 years per Back to the Future and lest you doubt, the Florida Marlins just became the Miami Marlins in time for their World Series appearance in 3 years.

    72. Re:Ha! by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      Daetrin, no offence, but know your audience!

      Also, an inductive mousemat would be like wearing one of those magnet wristbands, it would be great for circulation

    73. Re:Ha! by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      I change the battery in my watch every 4 years. I believe it is other than alkaline. Lithium or silver oxide. And after 4 years, no leaks. And it is an expensive watch too.

      So why not have designs that look to conserve power when not required.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    74. Re:Ha! by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      barump bump!

      I get no respect, no respect at all I tell ya'

      My marriage is on the rocks, my wife just broke up with her boyfriend.

      Last week I came home early from work and say a guy running, naked. I yelled out "Hey buddy, why are you doing that?" he yelled back"because you came home from work early"

      I told my dentist my teeth are going yellow. He told me to wear a brown necktie.

      My psychiatrist told me I'm going crazy. I told him, "If you don't mind, I'd like a second opinion." He said, "All right. You're ugly too!"

      I got a million of them folks, a million of them. Available for weddings, bar-bat mitzvahs, I'll be here all week, tell your friends, and try the veal. Remember to tip your wait person because they try really hard to help you

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    75. Re:Ha! by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      I remember that remote. I had one of those when I was young also. Once, my dad came into the room with a length of chain in his hand and it cause the TV to change channels. Very interesting technology.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    76. Re:Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While we are at it, can we make it hit delete everything if we shake it like an Etch A Sketch! Or power up if we shake it like a shake weight.

    77. Re:Ha! by Daetrin · · Score: 1

      "know your audience!"

      Exactly! The typical slashdotter isn't even going to be awake before noon, so there will be plenty of time for it to charge in the morning!

      Now obviously this wouldn't be an ideal product for the subset that live in the basement, unless their parents are likely to turn the lights on themselves in the morning.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    78. Re:Ha! by hulvey · · Score: 1

      Battery shelf life typically represents the time it takes for a battery to self-discharge to 80-90% of its rated capacity. So, a battery with 7 year shelf life would retain useful capacity for far longer than that. Some lithium photo batteries are claimed to have a shelf life of 15 years to 90% of capacity. Our modeling takes the self-discharge impact into account. -Rob Hulvey, Broadcom

  2. Lithium batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With specialty lithium batteries that cost near as much as they keyboard :P Alkaline
    The shelf life of an alkaline battery is only about 7 years.

    1. Re:Lithium batteries by icebike · · Score: 2

      With specialty lithium batteries that cost near as much as they keyboard :P Alkaline
      The shelf life of an alkaline battery is only about 7 years.

      The article mentioned nothing about Lithium batteries, but did explicitly mention "A set of two AA batteries", which presumably means commercial off the shelf batteries.

      Keyboards are easy.

      Nothing is happening on the keyboard unless keys are pressed. Pressing any key can also fire up the radio to send a pulse. There does not need to be constant communication, and the radio does not need to be running all the time, as long as the receiving end bluetooth stack is set to not time out. All you need is a fast power-up chipset.

      This wouldn't work with a mouse (at least not a laser mouse).

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    2. Re:Lithium batteries by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I believe the bluetooth spec requires constant communication. You could theoretically disconnect/reconnect each time, but that usually takes a few seconds at the very least.

    3. Re:Lithium batteries by icebike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The bluetooth spec is extensible.
      You don't have to have constant communications, you only have to answer polls, but only as often as the other side sends them.
      With just a small profile change you could minimize that to once an hour if you wanted.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    4. Re:Lithium batteries by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Standard batteries don't last 10 years, even with 0 use. So it doesn't matter if the radio is off until needed, the batteries will be dead well before then even if you never use it.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:Lithium batteries by icebike · · Score: 1

      Other posts on this thread suggest otherwise.

      With nearly zero drain, even alkaline will last 10 years.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Lithium batteries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been super impressed with the battery life of my Logitech M705. It claims it can run two years on a set of batteries. I don't know if that's true, but I've used it for probably an average of five or six hours a day for the past five months, and it's not only still going on the original batteries, it claims it has 95%/1033 days of battery left. I don't necessarily believe that, but even if they died tomorrow, I would still say that's really, really good battery life for a wireless laser mouse.

    7. Re:Lithium batteries by Teknikal69 · · Score: 1

      Same situation here I've been using the same batteries in my M505 for about a year now as well I'm not sure how long Logitech claimed but I often forget to turn it off and it's still working like the day I bought it.

    8. Re:Lithium batteries by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

      I think there's a good chance this will use Bluetooth Low Energy, which can pause an arbitrarily long time between messages in either direction.

  3. It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by syousef · · Score: 2

    ...to increase battery life of course....and when they fail in 3 years instead of the promised 10, you get to go out and buy a whole new keyboard. (It lasts 10 years so why allow the user to change the battery).

    We're seeing this with point and shoot cameras now. As recently as 2-3 years ago models that ran on AA batteries existed and some of them had decent battery life (a couple of hundred shots with flash). Now every new camera model is tied to a different proprietary lithium battery. This is for the good of the consumer of course, not so the camera manufacturer can gouge on batteries and make it more cost effective for the customer to replace the camera every 2-3 years. Makes me want to spit.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by grahamsaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure what kind of camera you use, but the rechargeable, proprietary battery that came with my Canon DSLR has worked well for years and gone through hundreds of charge / discharge cycles without any noticeable reduction in battery life. While not as cheap as AA batteries, I just looked up replacement cost and found that I could get a new battery for about $30 -- not that I have any need to at this point. And while the battery is proprietary to canon, it's used in a number of their DSLR cameras, so there's a good chance that if I replace my camera I'll be able to keep the old battery as a spare.

      --
      Facts have a liberal bias.
    2. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by chispito · · Score: 5, Informative

      We're seeing this with point and shoot cameras now. As recently as 2-3 years ago models that ran on AA batteries existed and some of them had decent battery life (a couple of hundred shots with flash). Now every new camera model is tied to a different proprietary lithium battery.

      Yes, but the batteries are smaller, denser, and last longer. What is the problem, exactly?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      I used to be a big fan of AAs in cameras, but I'm pleased with the performance of my Li-Ion in my new camera. Battery management is a lot easier. I also picked up a spare battery for $5 off Amazon.

    4. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by mirix · · Score: 1

      This was my first thought too. 'never need to change the battery' is newspeak for 'no user-replaceable battery'.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    5. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not sure what kind of camera you use, but the rechargeable, proprietary battery that came with my Canon DSLR has worked well for years and gone through hundreds of charge / discharge cycles without any noticeable reduction in battery life. While not as cheap as AA batteries, I just looked up replacement cost and found that I could get a new battery for about $30 -- not that I have any need to at this point.

      And while the battery is proprietary to canon, it's used in a number of their DSLR cameras, so there's a good chance that if I replace my camera I'll be able to keep the old battery as a spare.

      Try getting that proprietary battery in another 5-10 years. There are vintage cameras operating today that are many decades old. This will not be the case in future.

      Also some manufacturers are worse than others and have a new camera per camera or set of similar cameras. Others re-use the same battery.

      What is needed is a set of standard sized Lithium batteries...There's no reason for the current mess other than planned obsolence and price gouging. Heck Sony has even started chipping their cameras the way printer manufacturers chip their cartridges to prevent 3rd party batteries from eating into their overpriced originals.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    6. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by grahamsaa · · Score: 1

      You make a good point -- I think that Canon is a lot better than some other manufacturers in this respect, but I just checked and their newest DSLRs are using a different battery which doesn't look like it'll work with my current camera. I think that having standardized battery types would be great -- it would be nice if batteries were as interchangeable as, say SD or CF cards. I see no reason why that isn't possible. That said, getting a hold of a CF card in 10 years may be tricky as well; guess we'll have to wait and see.

      --
      Facts have a liberal bias.
    7. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by GrpA · · Score: 1

      This is an important point.

      I have three digital cameras, all less than 10 years old, sitting on a drawer for this very reason. Now I will not buy a camera that does not take AA batteries.

      However, in the context of keyboards, I do not keep a keyboard more than 10 years. I think the longest I ever had one was 9 years and the keys eventually broke. Great keyboard ( PS2 original ) but they have their limits.

      GrpA

      --
      Enjoy science fiction? "Turing Evolved" - AI, Mecha, Androids and rail-gun battles. What more could you want?
    8. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by c++0xFF · · Score: 1

      Heck Sony has even started chipping their cameras the way printer manufacturers chip their cartridges to prevent 3rd party batteries from eating into their overpriced originals.

      Yeah, but knock-off printer cartridges don't explode because they were made without protective circuitry.

    9. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      It's because AA batteries are an inconvenient form factor for a device that should be small and mostly rectangular...

      You can still get them, but they're bulky compared to ones made with a boxy battery - http://www.usa.canon.com/cusa/consumer/products/cameras/digital_cameras/powershot_a1200

      Give it some time and we may see a standard emerge there. Digital cameras are still not a mature product yet.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    10. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      As recently as 2-3 years ago models that ran on AA batteries existed and some of them had decent battery life (a couple of hundred shots with flash). Now every new camera model is tied to a different proprietary lithium battery. This is for the good of the consumer of course, not so the camera manufacturer can gouge on batteries and make it more cost effective for the customer to replace the camera every 2-3 years. Makes me want to spit.

      Some of Canon's A series Powershots still take AA batteries. Pentax is known to make AA powered DSLRs. The latest one, Pentax K-r came with Li-ion battery, but you can buy a special adapter to use AA.

    11. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't use a keyboard newer then 2003. I loathe windows keys. The keyboard I'm currently typing on was made in 1995 and will probably keep working until I'm ready to retire, assuming I can still get motherboards that take PS2 keyboards. I even have to use an adapter because all my keyboards are the large 5 pin DIN connector. I have a bunch of spares just in case but I haven't had a keyboard die on me ever. I just take them apart and clean it throughly every year and they look good as new. It's not like I don't use the keyboards much either, I'm a programmer so I spend my days typing.
      I suppose if I get desperate and I can't use my stash of good keyboards I'll have to order one of the expensive specialty keyboards with USB and no Windows keys. I hope that day never comes.

    12. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by cultiv8 · · Score: 1

      "xyzzy" Nope, still at work.

      A hollow voice says "fool."

      --
      sysadmins and parents of newborns get the same amount of sleep.
    13. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pentax is known to make AA powered DSLRs.

      So do Canon. I have a 5D (mark 1) and a 50D. For both of them, I also have the battery grip, which comes with a cassette: fill the cassette with six AA batteries, slot it into the grip, and away you go.

      Okay, it's not standard, in the sense that you have to buy the grip to get that ability. But if you're buying a $1500 DSLR, an extra 10% for the grip (which gives you more than just the ability to use AA batteries) isn't that much to pay.

    14. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by The+Snowman · · Score: 1

      We're seeing this with point and shoot cameras now. As recently as 2-3 years ago models that ran on AA batteries existed and some of them had decent battery life (a couple of hundred shots with flash). Now every new camera model is tied to a different proprietary lithium battery. This is for the good of the consumer of course, not so the camera manufacturer can gouge on batteries and make it more cost effective for the customer to replace the camera every 2-3 years. Makes me want to spit.

      I bought a Samsung point and shoot camera a few years ago. About a year ago I dropped it on the lens and it stopped working. It was out of warranty and better models were out anyway, so I bought a new one (ST90) a little bit later.

      I was both relieved and impressed that not only did the battery from my old camera work in the new one (same model number, it wasn't just the right size), but the USB cable with a proprietary end was identical as well.

      --
      24 beers in a case, 24 hours in a day. Coincidence? I think not!
    15. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 2

      I'm in this very situation with my Logitech Dinovo Edge bluetooth keyboard for mac, which I like pretty darn well. After two years, the battery charge only lasts a couple hours. The battery is proprietary and sealed deep inside under layers of plastic and adhesive. The keyboard is still under warranty, but they refuse to service it. I can mail it back for a full refund, and they admitted to me that they will just trash it when it arrives, because they stopped making the mac edition. Even though the windows version uses the same battery of course. Ridiculous.

      And despite it all I really would buy a new one if I could, because there's no decent substitute. Hell, I really wish they'd make a mac version of the K400, which has a less idiotic trackpad. I'd jump to buy that, and I haven't bought anything but food and booze for months.

    16. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by ceoyoyo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Crack open that battery and what do you find? A couple of standard sized lithium batteries.

    17. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      You could buy an Apple keyboard instead.

    18. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Vegemeister · · Score: 1

      A lot of the desktop environments are starting to assume you have a super key. Gnome 3, Unity. Even fluxbox's defaults use it, IIRC.

    19. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    20. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by wagnerrp · · Score: 1

      Try getting that proprietary battery in another 5-10 years. There are vintage cameras operating today that are many decades old. This will not be the case in future.

      So? There may be vintage film camera from decades or even a century or more old that are still in use. So what? Lenses have gotten smaller and lighter, gotten fancy things like auto-focus and image stabilization, but they haven't really gotten better. Film has improved, but you can put new film in old cameras. You can't do that with a digital camera. You get the performance of the sensor that came with the camera, and nothing more. No improved resolution, or framerate, or noise level, or light sensitivity, and the sensor is likely to burn out in 10-20 years on its own. When the new ones offer all the capability of the old ones and more, why stick with the old ones?

    21. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's also a lot of Vintage cameras that don't quite work properly because they used 1.3V Mercury based batteries that are no longer easily obtainable. These cameras will work with modern 1.5V button cell replacements, but generally this will throw the light meter out. Where the camera required two cells, the difference between 2.6V and 3.0V is pretty big.

    22. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Razed+By+TV · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the batteries are smaller, denser, and last longer. What is the problem, exactly?

      Well, the problem is with your argument. You have linked size, density, and life with oddball proprietary formats.
      Just as easily, a smaller, denser, longer lasting standardized battery could have been made. If not universally standardized, at least brand standardized.

    23. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by sl149q · · Score: 1

      My venerable IBM Klicky keyboards have been in constant use for just under two decades... I keep thinking I should by some backups (UniComp still makes them) but they just refuse to stop working.

    24. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      Try getting that proprietary battery in another 5-10 years. There are vintage cameras operating today that are many decades old. This will not be the case in future.

      I understand what you're saying, but think you are wrong. I have a Panasonic camera which is 10 years old, was relatively unpopular at the time it was new, and relies on a proprietary battery which only works in that model and maybe 1-2 others of a similar vintage. I can still get that battery from third party manufacturers for about $30.

      I also think you underestimate both the popular interest in DSLR equipment of all vintages and the commitment of Nikon and Canon in particular to supporting their products for a loooooooooong time after they are superseded.

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    25. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could but the feel of Apple keyboards suck. My old keyboards are similar to the NMB 'Right touch' feel. Best keyboards I've ever used. I recently bought one of the SteelSeries mechanical keyboards. It's not bad but the key presses are a little loud, not a click but a longer duration sproing sound from the switches resonating. The linearity of the keypress force is high instead of having a little bit of lightness near the bottom of the travel for tactile feedback. I don't know maybe after a decade of used it'll feel better.

    26. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      I have a Canon 350D (Rebel in the US?) DSLR. You can get imitation batteries for less than $10 that will do pretty well, in fact I have two imitation batteries that have both out-lasted the original Canon battery. Depending on your model, you could also get a battery grip, which would be able to take 6 AA batteries. (A battery grip is a good idea anyway).
      A DSLR's value depends for large part on it's life-time, so you'll probably be able to still find new parts for it in 10 years.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    27. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      Shhh! Stop giving HP ideas!!

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    28. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by syousef · · Score: 1

      Dude have you ever tried getting a proprietary battery for a 1980s film camera? Good luck finding it cheap.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    29. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      Fortunately all the battery packs take regular AA cells and make holding the camera a pleasure as an added bonus.

    30. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Do you also use a ball mouse with no scroll wheel?

    31. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or... I don't know... Just disable the windows keys. Or even.... Man-up and stop being such a pansy. If you can't get used to a couple of out of the way keys (don't argue they are) you must be so old and out of touch that I would be surprised if you weren't still programming for the Analytical Engine.

    32. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by imahawki · · Score: 1

      You make a good point -- I think that Canon is a lot better than some other manufacturers in this respect, but I just checked and their newest DSLRs are using a different battery which doesn't look like it'll work with my current camera. I think that having standardized battery types would be great -- it would be nice if batteries were as interchangeable as, say SD or CF cards. I see no reason why that isn't possible. That said, getting a hold of a CF card in 10 years may be tricky as well; guess we'll have to wait and see.

      CF cards are still faster than SD and are still used in higher end camera's like my 5D MKII.

    33. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by cnj · · Score: 1

      There are various after-market vendors for at least the major brands in digital SLRs. Even with the newer generation of Canon batteries (e.g. for the 7D) which have special chips to communicate with the camera, at least for the time being, non-smart batteries will at least still work.

      Is this ideal, as a consumer? No, it'd be better for consumers if Canon were to release instructions for other manufacturers to communicate in the same way their own batteries do. However, there is sufficient demand for cheaper non-OEM batteries that several companies will sell them, and probably continue to have some available past the life of the camera (I just bought a new round for the 20D, which was replaced by the 30D about six years ago).

      Even if the specific batteries are no longer available, the Canon dSLRs can still be powered by AA batteries if you have the hand grip (which I could never imagine shooting without, although I can foresee arguments from people who prefer the smaller size without it).

      --
      Never trust anyone over 90000.
    34. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is my preferred pointing device, with three buttons. I don't like the balance and momentum feel of optical mice -- not enough mass in the middle. They all feel insubstantial. The best mouse feel ever was the Logitech wireless optical mouse for the Atari ST. The optical part was for wireless communications not tracking movement. It had a heavy ball and the batteries were in just the right spot to move the CG of the device with your hand on it to the center of the ball. It just felt right.

    35. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a lathe, so no more Analytical Engine programming for me. I started programming professionally in the late '80s so I'm not yet ancient. Out of touch, not so much. I write video drivers for tablets and smartphones.

      Those stupid extra keys don't add anything to the keyboard the way I edit code or use the GUI, all they do is move keys I want to use farther away and make the space bar smaller. If they actually did something USEFUL I wouldn't have a problem with them.
      I spend most of my computer time at work with my fingers on the keys. Why wouldn't I want a tool that makes this as comfortable as possible?

    36. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Why? Apple makes some of the worst keyboards in the business now. I guess they don't have a Windows key on them though, if that's a requirement.

    37. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by toddestan · · Score: 1

      In some of those cameras, you can use a zinc-air battery meant for a hearing aid as the voltage is much closer. Disadvantage though is the batteries don't last very long.

    38. Re:It's a trap: Next step: Proprietary battery by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Didn't read the post I replied to, hey?

  4. Great. by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 2
    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

  5. Drop the battery all together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder about the potential for greener computing. If the power usage is so low, drop the battery all together and add a solar cell with a low leakage super cap.

    1. Re:Drop the battery all together by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The key presses can power it!

    2. Re:Drop the battery all together by chispito · · Score: 1

      Already exists from Logitech, though it uses Logitech's standard RF receiver, and is not BT. http://www.amazon.com/Logitech-Wireless-Solar-Keyboard-K750/dp/B004MF11MU/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1323304614&sr=8-1

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    3. Re:Drop the battery all together by PixetaledPikachu · · Score: 1

      I wonder about the potential for greener computing. If the power usage is so low, drop the battery all together and add a solar cell with a low leakage super cap.

      You mean like this? http://www.logitech.com/en-au/keyboards/keyboard/devices/7454 . It's not bluetooth, but I think it'll work with tablet with full fledged USB port such as the Acer Iconia, or the GTab with usb adapter

    4. Re:Drop the battery all together by Khyber · · Score: 1

      That will suck for gaming, at least FPS style.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Drop the battery all together by NemoinSpace · · Score: 1

      I checked all my keyboards. They range from 5V 50ma to 300ma. Odd in itself. Now I am off to build an LED array to power the solar cell. That should do it...

    6. Re:Drop the battery all together by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      Actually, it would be better for FPS than any other use. You have 2 options, either each keypress creates lots of electricity (makes keyboards harder to use), or make lots of keypresses (FPS is *definitely* a contender there).

    7. Re:Drop the battery all together by Khyber · · Score: 1

      The only way this is good for FPS is if you can keep the button pressed down for any reasonable amount of time. Sometimes you just gotta keep running and not stop. It would be crappy for you to have to let go and press the key again to keep running.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    8. Re:Drop the battery all together by zorog · · Score: 1

      From the linked site: "It almost feels like typing on your laptop, but more comfortable." Just what I want in my desktop sized keyboard

    9. Re:Drop the battery all together by Tomato42 · · Score: 1

      That only excludes W key, the A and D keys are still pressed often, even if you're just running.

    10. Re:Drop the battery all together by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Sometimes you just gotta keep running and not stop.

      World of Warcraft is not an FPS, real games have bunny hopping and strafing!

  6. Aww shucks by wanzeo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just built a kernel specifically without the bluetooth modules in an attempt to save power on my laptop. Damn you progress.

    1. Re:Aww shucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you need a bluetooth keyboard for your laptop?

    2. Re:Aww shucks by LinuxIsGarbage · · Score: 1

      If the computer is used as a desktop at home, that means one less cable to disconnect when going portable (assuming like most consumers, you don't have a docking station).

    3. Re:Aww shucks by hechacker1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Are you sure that's saving you power? Sometimes you have to initialize the device in order to activate the power saving features. It happens in Windows as well with wireless cards. The default state is "max power."

    4. Re:Aww shucks by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Or just a USB hub.

  7. Battery Shelf Life? by uberbrodt · · Score: 1

    I didn't think alkaline batteries would last that long on the shelf, let alone in use.

    Also, 10 years is nothing for a keyboard! I've got an IBM Model M that's at least from the mid 80's and works fine.

    1. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by Anachragnome · · Score: 2

      "I've got an IBM Model M that's at least from the mid 80's and works fine..."

      Since they plan a ten-year battery life, they probably do not provide means of replacing the battery. In short, once you go to this type of keyboard, you are tied to never-ending replacements on a ten-year cycle. This isn't a feature, it's planned obsolescence.

      Hang on to that Model M.

    2. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by msauve · · Score: 1

      Good alkaline batteries can have a 7 year shelf life. I'm not sure what "shelf life" is technically defined as, but assume it means that at least the majority of charge is still available. i.e. after 7 years, they're still useful, and not dead.

      In any case, how much 10 year old computer equipment do you still have in use, especially $50 stuff (cables excepted).

      --
      "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    3. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by Baloroth · · Score: 2

      Note the lack of not-a-wire coming out of it.

      Also, given that it's a Model M, I'm guessing you can also note the not-a-sound you are hearing right now from the deafness of using that keyboard for that long.

      Lithium AAs can have a shelf life of a decade or more.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    4. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that this hypothetical 10-year keyboard would be the ghastliest of laptop-feel membrane crap.

      Model Ms don't need active cooling or anything; but they pull a few hundred milliamps at 5v, wired, so I'm guessing that good, honest, real keyswitches are not the choice of champions when it comes to low power devices...

    5. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      usually the shelf life means after x years the battery will still contain 90% of its capacity

    6. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by uberbrodt · · Score: 1

      Admittedly, not much; most of it I wouldn't want to use (floppy disks, mice with physical trackers). Keyboards seem to be one of the few pieces of computer hardware that have gotten worse and not better over the years, though.

    7. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      You're assuming the battery actually WILL last 10 years. After a year, most warranties run out and there's nothing the consumer can do about it anyways. If advertising a keyboard as lasting 10 years results in a 25% increase in sales and 10% of them are returned a year later (most people don't bother returning defective products after 3 months unless they cost over $100), that is considered a success.

    8. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Let's see:
      A server, some hard/floppy/CD drives, a UPS (made in 1998), some other computers (just occasionally). Well, from the "under $50" category, I guess only the floppy and CD drives remain, but still. I also plan to use my keyboard (Logitech UltraX Flat - I like laptop-style keyboards) for the foreseeable future. I recently replace my mouse, because the old one was wearing out (left clicks didn't always register), but I wil use the current one until it wears out too (though I might have to buy a new mouse just in case - mice that can talk PS/2 seem to be endangered species).

    9. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by Kaenneth · · Score: 4, Funny

      IBM Model M, a keyboard that you can use to kill a man, then use to type his obituary.

    10. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by BaldingByMicrosoft · · Score: 2

      I don't work for them -- I'm just a happy customer. Don't hang on to your Model M - get a new one in black with USB:

      Unicomp Customizer

      Unicomp SpaceSaver

      I still use a wireless mouse, but ran an active USB cable to my comfey chair so I could put one of these beauties on my lap. Buckling springs FTW!

    11. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In short, once you go to this type of keyboard, you are tied to never-ending replacements on a ten-year cycle.

      You are aware of how ridiculous that sounds, right?

    12. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      The switches shouldn't matter ; it's the controller electronics that draw the current. I wouldn't be surprised if the Unicomp Customizers didn't have quite the same robust build quality as the original Model M, but I would expect that they draw much less juice since their controllers are far more likely to be a single IC.

      I wonder if you could retrofit a Model M with a newer controller?

    13. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by chrysrobyn · · Score: 1

      IBM Model M, a keyboard that you can use to kill a man, then use to type his obituary.

      I tried, once. Picked it up and chased someone out the door. Catch was that it was still plugged in. Cord and connector were stronger than my 200 lbs of running inertia. Snapped me back and I lost the guy I was chasing.

    14. Re:Battery Shelf Life? by T+Murphy · · Score: 1

      So... "Type M for Murder"?

  8. doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what kind of batteries will not self discharge in less than 10 years even without a load ?....

    1. Re:doubt it by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 5, Funny

      Couple the keyboard with a battery charger (powered by its own batteries)

    2. Re:doubt it by LighterShadeOfBlack · · Score: 1

      The hypothetical ones PR guys use for cheap press.

      --
      Spelling mistakes, grammatical errors, and stupid comments are intentional.
    3. Re:doubt it by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      Lithium? Don't know exact chemistry / type, but I've got a few button-cell Lithium batteries around the house that have been powering something (backup memory, RTC), are much older than 10 years, and still output >2V (3.2V or so start value).

    4. Re:doubt it by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      according to the datasheets energizer lithium aa's have 90% capacity after 15 years, alkalines have 80% after 7 years.

    5. Re:doubt it by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      And if you believe that I've got a bridge in Arizona that leads to your own private barrier islands I want to sell you REALLY cheap. Think of the money you could make charging tolls as all those tourists use the bridge to drive onto your island in the beautiful Indian Ocean!

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:doubt it by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Why would you not believe data sheets about shelf life from a company that has been making batteries for 115 years?

  9. A better idea. by Cosgrach · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why not put wires on the key board (perhaps even a USB connection), and the battery is not even needed. Wow.

    --
    Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    1. Re:A better idea. by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

      You do realize there are many times a wireless connection may be preferred, right?

    2. Re:A better idea. by syousef · · Score: 1

      Why not put wires on the key board (perhaps even a USB connection), and the battery is not even needed. Wow.

      Added bonus - the kids and wife are less likely to walk away with it and misplace it. I don't know how much of my life I've wasted looking for remote controls.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    3. Re:A better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A 10 foot USB cable running across my living room floor is no good.

    4. Re:A better idea. by viperidaenz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The two year old running around my house is the reason I now have a wireless mouse and keyboard. Just because there is a cable attached, doesn't mean a child won't try walking away with it.

    5. Re:A better idea. by Cosgrach · · Score: 1

      Indeed I do. I think that it would be great to have fewer wires lurking about and having the perceived simplicity of wireless. Over the years, I have tried several wireless keyboards, from various manufacturers. Not one has ever made the cut. Finally, in great despair I went back to wired keyboards.

      But in the end, while a wireless connection may be *preferred*, I suspect that it almost never required.

      --
      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?
    6. Re:A better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The line between preferred and required is thin.
      Sure, you can have a 20 foot usb cable for your HTPC's keyboard. Or you could go wireless.
      It is not "required" per se, but using a wire is a luxury.

    7. Re:A better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is it that most of the people that I encounter seem to have been shat from the Sphincter of Mediocrity?

      Birds of a feather flock together?

    8. Re:A better idea. by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 1

      I have a Logitech MK320. It makes the cut fine for me as a programmer. Cheap too.

      I went wireless because I was forever snagging cables on something, like my foot, and sending things flying onto the floor. Also easy to move the keyboard out of the way to prevent stray cats from typing on it in my absence.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
    9. Re:A better idea. by aztektum · · Score: 1

      So they haven't fit a need for you, so wth, let's stop using wireless keyboards.

      I see the mind-think agrees. Power to the majority I guess.

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    10. Re:A better idea. by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      Why not put wires on the key board (perhaps even a USB connection), and the battery is not even needed. Wow.

      Yeah, and then if you put batteries at the end of the cable, you wouldn't even have to plug it in to the computer!

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    11. Re:A better idea. by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      How do you see the screen from 20 foot away , binoculars? Or do you have someone standing next to it to give you verbal feedback??

    12. Re:A better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you know they make televisions bigger than 19" these days? There's also an entire medical profession dedicated to helping people with poor eyesight.

    13. Re:A better idea. by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

      HTPCs are usually connected to TVs...

      --
      $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
    14. Re:A better idea. by rokstar · · Score: 1

      The cat running around my house that likes to nom on cables is the reason I have a wireless mouse and keyboard. Works great for me along with a set of rechargeable batteries.

    15. Re:A better idea. by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Any suggestions for cats and laptop power cables? I've had to cut open and repair my wifes laptop power cord twice because the cat bit it and shorted it out

  10. 10 years? by Threni · · Score: 1

    Most stuff nowadays is cheap shit made in India or China or whatever? None of it is going to work in ten years time. You'll be lucky if you're still using it in 2 or 3 years. And that's if we've not moved onto another even better standard than Bluetooth, which doesn't seem to have taken off outside of headsets.

    Out of interest, why exactly don't *all* TVs/DBD players etc use bluetooth? It would be quite handy to be able to use any phone made in the last 10 years to control them all using free, intuitive software, rather than a pile of ugly plastic crap, all of which need battery maintenance, all work in different ways etc?

    1. Re:10 years? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Most stuff nowadays is cheap shit made in India or China or whatever? None of it is going to work in ten years time. You'll be lucky if you're still using it in 2 or 3 years. And that's if we've not moved onto another even better standard than Bluetooth, which doesn't seem to have taken off outside of headsets.

      I have plenty of cheap newer stuff that has lasted me for a few years and I imagine will make 10. I have too many old wired keyboards at my house and don't have the heart to throw them out since they all work.

      Out of interest, why exactly don't *all* TVs/DBD players etc use bluetooth? It would be quite handy to be able to use any phone made in the last 10 years to control them all using free, intuitive software, rather than a pile of ugly plastic crap, all of which need battery maintenance, all work in different ways etc?

      For one thing interfeerence. Too many bluetooth devices will saturate your 2.4GHz band very quickly. You can also get interference from microwave ovens. Still IR has it's issues too. I'd like to see something on a different band that doesn't require line of sight.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:10 years? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Because when you lose/break your dvd remote they want to be able to charge $50 for a replacement when it only cost $70 to buy the dvd player in the first place, and I guess IR is still cheaper and not many people watch tv without line-of-sight.

    3. Re:10 years? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      This response is being typed on a 1987 vintage keyboard that came with an IBM PC-XT-286. It's still going strong, and as long as I never drink coffee in this room, expect it to keep going.

      Of course that takes it out of the "stuff nowadays" category. Remember way back when solid state electronics were being sold as being more reliable?

      I wonder what the net environmental impact is of removing all lead from solder, once you factor in the shortened lifetimes of electronic equipment, and the percentage of dead stuff that doesn't get properly recycled.
      I wonder exactly how much lead it really takes to avoid tin whiskers.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:10 years? by ltcdata · · Score: 1

      XT=8088/8086 AT=80286 :)

    5. Re:10 years? by petman · · Score: 1

      Speaking about IR, the one thing I miss from the iPAQ I had 10 years ago is the ability to use the IR transceiver to control just about everything - TV, VCR, satellite TV decoder, air-conditioning etc. It's ironic that there's something that a 10-year old PDA can do that a modern Android smartphone can't.

    6. Re:10 years? by Threni · · Score: 1

      Interference is a non problem. I'm sure that a local device which needs a tiny burst of a message every few mins can handle interference. For one thing, the device (ie my phone) would be able to wait for an acknowledgement, so it could keep sending the message until it was received correctly. It could be checksummed etc.

    7. Re:10 years? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      The PC-XT-286 was an oddity, designed to use up some surplus 80286 processors. They had a bunch of 80286 CPUs spec'ed at 6MHz, which wouldn't go in the PC-AT, which required 8MHz. They had enough that they didn't want to throw them away, so they made up this special model. It was clocked at 6MHz and came with 640MB on the motherboard that was run at zero wait states, which recovered most of the speed lost by the 2MHz clock reduction. It was also packaged in a regular XT case, which meant that it couldn't take the "tall" AT cards, which turned out to not be much of a limitation.

      There were only a limited number built, because it was meant to use up a fixed stock of CPU chips. It also never sold well on the regular marketplace, being something of an oddity. Shortly after it ended up being sold on an "employee firesale", which is how I got mine. Shortly after that there were BIOS images made available that bypassed the "speed trap" that prevented overclocking. I ran mine happily at 8MHz, and many people ran theirs at 9MHz.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  11. G2 Microsystems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this development is a consequence of Broadcom's acquisition of G2 Microsystems, the Australian ultra low power WiFi people?

  12. Idiots by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1
    FTA:

    A set of two AA batteries would be enough to power a keyboard using the BCM20730 Bluetooth chip to connect with a computer for its entire lifetime

    The silly thing is, chances are keyboards using such chip would actually include that set of two AA batteries.

    As opposed to sticking a 1 cm^2 solar cell + supercapacitor onto it. Or a mechanism for "tilt back & forth a few times, use rest of the week". Well you get the point: if low-power enough, use that to get rid of batteries, not just prolong their life.

    1. Re:Idiots by syousef · · Score: 1

      FTA:

      A set of two AA batteries would be enough to power a keyboard using the BCM20730 Bluetooth chip to connect with a computer for its entire lifetime

      The silly thing is, chances are keyboards using such chip would actually include that set of two AA batteries.

      As opposed to sticking a 1 cm^2 solar cell + supercapacitor onto it. Or a mechanism for "tilt back & forth a few times, use rest of the week". Well you get the point: if low-power enough, use that to get rid of batteries, not just prolong their life.

      No thanks. I want to be able to replace the batteries if they die sooner than expected without throwing out the whole keyboard. This is exactly where things are headed. "I'm sorry your keyboard only lasted 2 years sir. You can buy our new improved model for just $79.95 which has been tested and rated to work for 15 years".....all lies designed to make you throw out perfectly functional equipment by crippling it.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    2. Re:Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Piezoelectric material under the keyboard and power it from that.

    3. Re:Idiots by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I think you missed his point. If there are no batteries, then you have nothing you need to replace.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  13. nuclear battery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how about a nuclear battery, that would last for decades with nontrivial power draw.

    1. Re:nuclear battery by Abreu · · Score: 1

      I'd like to avoid testicular cancer from having a nuclear device so close to my balls...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    2. Re:nuclear battery by anubi · · Score: 2

      Somehow, that makes me think of the old watch my dad had. World War II. Radium dial. Phosphorescent. Stayed lit all the time.

      A lot of people got sick making those watches. They would rub the brushes against their lips to make a fine point to paint with. The watches were later deemed to be dangerous and were no longer made.

      But, could we design a special "solar cell" that would take that radiation and convert it to electricity?

      How about miniature "radiation cell" array surrounding a low-level alpha source. Maybe it could provide a couple of uA, for hundreds of years. Enough to keep a super-cap charged.

      Its your suggestion, AC. I think its a good one. It just needs a bit of engineering to bring it to reality.

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    3. Re:nuclear battery by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      Those watches are still made every day. The light is generated by radioactive decay. Its rather well understood, its not really that dangerous unless of course you're eating large quantities of a toxic metal because you think eating paint is a good idea.

      In order for there to be enough useful energy there to harvest, it starts to become dangerous without shielding, then it gets complex and makes small scale production a ways off.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  14. Most AA don't have shelf life that long. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    The standard dry cell, based on manganese dioxide electrolyte, zinc as cathode and carbon as anode if I remember my high school physics right, does not last that even if it is not used!

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  15. Just as long... by skids · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just as long as you don't leave the capslock LED on.

    1. Re:Just as long... by ELCouz · · Score: 2

      Why not? It could recharge itself with the light of the caps lock LED ... RIGHT?????

  16. LOTS of problems, actually by syousef · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We're seeing this with point and shoot cameras now. As recently as 2-3 years ago models that ran on AA batteries existed and some of them had decent battery life (a couple of hundred shots with flash). Now every new camera model is tied to a different proprietary lithium battery.

    Yes, but the batteries are smaller, denser, and last longer. What is the problem, exactly?

    Several problems:
    - Forget to charge your battery? You're out of luck! You won't be able to get a standard replacement alkaline battery for a couple of bucks at the corner store
    - Looked after your camera for many years and want to sell it or show your children a vintage camera? You're out of luck! Your battery is too old to hold charge and they don't make batteries for that model camera any more
    - Have a lot of different cameras, and want to share a couple of sets of batteries between them? You're out of luck. Each camera you own uses a different battery. You need at least one per camera
    - You're a camera enthusiast and want to buy spare battteries? You'll have to decide which camera you need a spare battery for. You can't afford $30 x number of spares x cameras

    I've seen a lot of silly justifications ranging from the technology keeps improving so why would you want to use the old camera to who owns lots of cameras. But I promise you for me and many others these things matter. We talk about recycling and reuse, have shopping bags too flimsy to hold our goods that we are now charged for, conserve water, and use less than optimal lighting solutions to conserve energy, but the moment a company stands to make a profit by making something throw away or selling you a whole bunch of junk when one item would suffice, well the environment goes out the window. It's moronic to be this wasteful.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by mabhatter654 · · Score: 2

      I don't know... Having MULTIPLE $500 cameras... And hundreds more in accessories, and complaining that an extra $30 rechargable battery or two is kind of silly.

      Of course that's why companies feel they can gouge:). I do think that when they get into chipping batteries there are issues with how you make the thing work in 10 years... I know plenty of people with 10 yr old SLRs that keep going...

    2. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      No its not -- its bullshit greed, pure and simple. I'm and sick and tired of proprietary shit. It's inefficient, and wastes MY time trying to find the "proper" battery for device X.

      Why do you think we have _standards_ such as AA, AAA, C, D batteries for? Or USB that allows devices to charge.

      We need _standards_ for lithium-ion batteries as well.

    3. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by mirix · · Score: 1

      We have them already. (sort of, at least. I don't think they are formal standards [IEC or EIA or whatnot], but they are at least de facto standards.)

      Every laptop battery I've taken apart is just based on 18650 cells. Why the laptops don't just take the cells alone is something I may never understand. Probably because they only have $10 worth of cells, and they'd rather sell you a $50+ battery.

      It would be nice if they standardized some of the flat, polymer batteries though. like the kinds used in mobile phones and other flat, portable devices.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    4. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by Viceice · · Score: 1

      Well it really depends on the camera you buy. If you want one of those ultra slim compacts, that will fit in your pocket, a slim LiPo batt makes sense.

      Buy for professional dSLRs where you depend on your camera for your work, the handgrip battery compartment comes with a magazine which will accept AAs.

      The drawback is you need EIGHT AAs to do the same job of the regular battery, which is only slightly larger than a C cell.

      --
      Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
    5. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by Agripa · · Score: 1

      There used to be a NiCd/NiMH prismatic replacement for the AA which was used in small and low profile personal electronics. One problem with those and the newer lithium chemistry prismatic cells is that they can only tolerate much lower internal pressures which compromises their performance compared to cylindrical cells.

      One reason rechargeable lithium cells are not individually replaceable is the safety hazard of mismatched cells when they can not be individually monitored. There have been a number of fires in flashlights that use the rechargeable CR123 format cells when cells with different charge conditions were used together. That does not excuse the lack of a design which monitors individual cells and supports charge balancing but such would come at increased cost.

    6. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - You're a camera enthusiast and want to buy spare battteries? You'll have to decide which camera you need a spare battery for. You can't afford $30 x number of spares x cameras

      Simple solution...don't buy overpriced OEM accessories. I buy the batteries for my camera from ebay, and I never pay more than about $4 shipped. It's so cheap I hardly have to think about it. When I buy a new DSLR, I just automatically order 3 extra batteries off ebay. And in my experience, they work just as good as the OEM.

    7. Re:LOTS of problems, actually by bobaferret · · Score: 1

      At $2000+ per camera and $1000+ per lens I generally run with 3 batteries per battery type, that extra 60 doesn't even compare. I make money with these cameras, and I prefer the custom batteries. They charge quickly, I don't have to constantly deal with all the extra weight of a pack of batteries. I can plug them into the light weight charger and see their charge level without having to stop shooting. Plus when you're out in the middle of nowhere there's no store to buy batteries at anyway. When you're in the middle of a shoot you either have an extra battery on you or you don't, doesn't matter what kind. The regular AAs in my flashes drive me crazy, they never seem to last as long as my Canon packs, and I'm constantly stealing them for other things around the house when I run out... And I hate having to deal with getting 4 things into the flash in the right placement and order as opposed to just popping in another clip. Much less keeping track of the 8 other batteries floating around, you've got to always have extras. Now, If the companies would get together and make standardized clips/holders and chargers for groups of batteries I'd be interested.

       

  17. power use... by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    tinfoil hat time!

    This bluetooth chip would draw a whopping .057mAh at 1.5v, or .0285mAh at 3v. (Assuming a 2500mAh AA cell type, with 10 years of power draw.)

    You can easily generate this using biologically inplanted power sources, or from a standard solar powered calculator's photocell, or even from a thin film thermocoupler.

    This would allow for ubiquitous bluetooth devices in a lot of surfaces, including things you would never consider to have need of a network stack.

    Hell, you could power this stack on an AM crystal radio!

    1. Re:power use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was thinking of putting Bluetooth in my artificial eye. Then I realized my wife could hack my eye to see where I've been looking.

    2. Re:power use... by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Or wirelessly, via coils in the desk:

      http://www.powermat.com/

    3. Re:power use... by caitsith01 · · Score: 1

      Why not power it using the key presses?

      --
      Read Pynchon.
  18. yay! by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

    Can I have a pony too?

    --
    Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  19. The problem with standards... by billstewart · · Score: 1

    is that there are so many to choose from. When cameras were larger, you had more room for batteries, but as there's increasing pressure to make them smaller and more power-hungry, that fails.

    If 2.4v is enough, you can use two AA batteries (most rechargeables only do 1.2v, but they hold a lot more power than 1.5v disposables), but it takes up a fair bit of space.

    3.6v and 3.7v LiPo rechargeable technology is becoming a widely available standard, with a range of different sizes and capacities, but needs an extra chip or two for power management (since they're very sensitive to over-charging and over-draining - dropping below 3.0v tends to kill them.) Since it's a bit below 5v, that means a standard USB is the obvious power supply interface for charging as well as data, and cellphones and similar devices use them.

    Also, while I can see that you might need to replace the charger for a camera, why would you want to use a point&shoot digital camera that's old enough that you can't find batteries for it? Resolution has been improving rapidly, and prices have been dropping rapidly. Using a bigger camera with real lenses on it, sure, but any point&shoot I can buy today is a lot better than the good one I got a couple of years ago.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  20. An even better idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not put electrodes into your fingers and power the keyboard with your nerves.

  21. solar panel? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    If the current draw is that low then you could just use a solar panel to recharge from room lights. Just like the calculators do. problem solved.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  22. "Leisure" computing... by Blingin'+AMD · · Score: 1

    Heh.

    Who would even /want/ to sit more than 36 inches from their monitor?

    --
    Now watch this drive.
    1. Re:"Leisure" computing... by Zorque · · Score: 1

      People with HTPCs, people with large monitors, gamers who use gamepads, people giving or viewing presentations, etc.

  23. Power by keyboard resistance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With that little power draw, I wonder if you could use the keyboard resistance to generate enough juice. When power gets low, just hit the shift key 10 times....

  24. External 4xAA battery pack, USB port by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's obviously clunky, but it shouldn't be hard to set up an external battery pack with four AA rechargeables and a USB output. If you want to get fancy, add a voltage regulator chip as insurance, in case your camera doesn't have one built in, or just trust that 4x1.2 - 4x1.5 is safe.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  25. Get energy from keypresses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't one make a keyboard which uses the energy of keypresses?

    1. Re:Get energy from keypresses by ledow · · Score: 1

      I'm going to assume a lot of "perfect" hardware here but:

      Total travel for your average keyboard: 4mm = 0.004m
      Total force needed to activate: 0.8N (scrimmed from a paper on ergonomics of keyboards)

      Work required = 0.0032Nm

      Average typist = 30 words per minute = 180 characters per minute = 3 characters per second. So you would tap a key to its full extent every 1/3rd of a second.

      Power required to type = 0.010666666666667 watt = 10mW at instantaneous intervals. Hardly enough to power a small USB signal, let alone a transmitting Bluetooth chip, and that's not including things like storage of power when you're not typing, efficiencies, etc.

      And NONE of that is useful energy - you'd have to make the keys take twice as much extra effort to type (and thus also incur more RSI-related problems) just to generate that 10mW in excess. The hardware required to make an over-100-keys keyboard generate any useful energy from every key would be, at it's simplest, some sort of sprung base that was activated for every keypress below the "base" level where the keys "hit bottom". You'd have a travel of 4mm at most there, and from those 3 presses a second you'd have to generate electricity somehow.

      The closest thing I've seen are quantum tunnelling composites and piezoelectrics that require a lot more force, or generate too little electricity, to do anything useful and I don't think you *can* get them as flat sheets the size of a keyboard (though you might be able to arrange some sort of whole keyboard -> small pressurised area).

      I just don't think the engineering required would ever reasonably be worth it, it would be more fragile, have many more moving parts, be harder to type on (at risk of inducing RSI), would probably move more under your fingers, and still require internal batteries / capacitors to cope over even brief non-typing periods.

      In a single line: Just not worth it.

      Which is probably why they don't exist.

  26. Wasteful wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all well and good, but how many times has a keyboard wire gotten that much in your way (when at a desk at least). With a wired keyboard you never need to litter the earth with used batteries or consume the resources needed to manufacture them. Wireless keyboards have their uses like living rooms, conference rooms, mobile devices and such, but when 10 million schmoes have one just so they can still sit 1.5 feet from their monitor at a cubicle is stupid. "But I can walk across my cube with it," says schmo_one. Yeah, and now you can't see your screen unless you buy an energy sucking carbon belching behemoth monitor. Good job.

    1. Re:Wasteful wasteful by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "This is all well and good, but how many times has a keyboard wire gotten that much in your way"

      Exactly! Not to mention that keeping a keyboard 10 years is disgusting!
      Skin particles drop every day into them, there are all sorts of bacteria and molds in there living from them who send billions of spores into the air right into your face.
      Impossible to clean, I just use 12$ wired keyboards and throw them out after a year when they get too icky for me.

    2. Re:Wasteful wasteful by gbjbaanb · · Score: 1

      you can clean the expensive ones. Unscrew the keyboard half from the circuitboard half and pop it in your dishwasher without detergent on the quick and warm cycle (not the 3 hour blast baked-on-crap cycle).

      Let it dry and you've got a squeaky clean keyboard. Do not put the electronics in or it'll break.

      I have an ancient compaq that I did this with, came out shiny and bright and the 6 key was no longer gunked up with spilled beer.

    3. Re:Wasteful wasteful by omnichad · · Score: 1

      I use wired Microsoft Natural keyboards and only replace when the letters wear off (despite not needing to see them). It takes about an hour twice a year to take all the keys off one-by-one and wash them by hand then wipe down the base, and put them back on. And all that time doubles as TV-watching time, so no time wasted.

  27. Sounds good to me. by anubi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About ten years ago, I bought a Memorex wireless keyboard at Pic-n-save aka "Big Lots".

    I think I paid about $10.

    Much to my amazement, its still running on a pair of "Everready lithium" batteries I put in when I first got it.

    I put those batteries in everything that I have a tendency to ignore maintenance on, like remotes. I have never seen one of those lithium cells leak yet.

    Its been one of those things with me that alkaline cells, regardless of who made them, leak. Even if they aren't dead yet.

    I rarely use the keyboard, but when I do, it works. It only transmits ten feet or so, but its enough. It feeds an old P166 I have loaded with DOS and WIN95 to run my old DOS stuff.

    What impressed me so was that the keyboard had no on-off switch. For ten years, the keyboard has been sitting there waiting for me to press a key.

    My hat's off to the engineer who designed the thing.

    I would not mind paying more for this keyboard's electronics in a sturdier mechanical design, but for ten bucks, I thought I got a really nice little gadget.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

    1. Re:Sounds good to me. by jones_supa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What impressed me so was that the keyboard had no on-off switch. For ten years, the keyboard has been sitting there waiting for me to press a key.

      Maybe it acts like TV remotes, being on only when a key is pressed. That's still an amazing achievement, I agree.

    2. Re:Sounds good to me. by Luckyo · · Score: 2

      Just out of interest, how much did you pay for the BATTERIES? :D

    3. Re:Sounds good to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Schrodingers Keyboard. If you don't press a key for 10 years the keyboard is both alive and dead.

    4. Re:Sounds good to me. by Genda · · Score: 1

      OOOOHHhhh! You looked at it! Its dead!

    5. Re:Sounds good to me. by philpalm · · Score: 1

      Lithium AA batteries run from $10 to $5 a pair. YMMV. NiMh AA are still developing. I have to recharge mine every two weeks. The older ones used to go down even though in dormant stage. Did you know you can charge up AA alkaline batteries? Just don't overcharge them, monitor its voltage state every 15 minutes and try not to go over 1.8 volts. (btw they do tend to leak after a while)

    6. Re:Sounds good to me. by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      No on off switch? Wow. Then I would suspect that the designers waited for a keypress before turning on the other circuitry, and then only kept it on for a few minutes after the last detected keystroke.

      Smart design, if that was done.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    7. Re:Sounds good to me. by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      In this case, I'm not sure if you even have to leave the power on for some minutes. The protocol should be something simple though, not something like Bluetooth with which you have to make time-consuming handshakes before you can send actual data.

    8. Re:Sounds good to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Schrodingers Keyboard. If you don't press a key for 10 years the keyboard is both alive and dead.

      Slashdot, why art thee so... brilliant? I actually laughed out in real life.

  28. buttons? by jendral_hxr · · Score: 1

    The chipset may ensure 10 years lifetime without replacing battery, but how about the buttons? People tends to slam the keyboard out of frustration.

    1. Re:buttons? by qualityassurancedept · · Score: 1

      Well obviously the buttons will be designed to start falling off in about 2 years, which means the astronomical sum you paid for the 10 year keyboard will translate into a 2 year keyboard that was five times more expensive than any other keyboard you might have bought... and anyway isn't 10 years a little too long a lifespan in today's technology timeline. I expect that in a couple of years I will have a pair of gloves (instead of a keyboard) and 3-d glasses (instead of a monitor) and the whole computer will work on a device no bigger than a cellphone is today... so carrying around a clunky battery powered keyboard will look goofy.

      --
      if your life is such a big joke then why should I care?
  29. 802.15.4 is closer to this than you think by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    Devices for 802.15.4 (what ZigBee uses), which is 250kbit max and low power device typically use just a tiny fraction of that, are already using AAA alkaline cells for multiple years (and then the shelf life starts to impact the cells). And the open source operating system TinyOS has made some interesting advancements with power management for its 802.15.4 based wireless stack. And the other front runner for open source wireless stacks is Contiki, with a rather nice mini IPv6 stack that is also capable of being extremely low power.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:802.15.4 is closer to this than you think by hitmark · · Score: 1

      Hmm, i wonder when i can ping my pants from my phone to get their location after a lively night out.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  30. Everready lithium by anubi · · Score: 1

    Next time you are in your local Mega-lo-mart check out the battery rack for the Everready Ultimate Lithium.

    http://www.walmart.com/search/search-ng.do?search_constraint=0&ic=48_0&Find.x=0&Find.y=0&Find=Find&_ta=1&search_query=energizer%20lithium%20batteries&_tt=energizer%20lithium

    The 8X on the package art seems a bit optimistic to me, but I personally have some of their first batteries ( gold with a red top ) still in service. I get the idea I do not get anywhere near 8X the Watt-Hr rating of a similiarly sized alkaline, but I get a helluva lot more shelf life from the lithiums.

    None of them have leaked.

    These are great for remotes, your earthquake kit, and the flashlight you keep in your car that has never worked when you needed it.

    Being I work a lot with electronic instruments, all of it gets these cells. Not only will the differential probe set still work after a year in the drawer, there won't be a mess inside. In the event of an emergency, I know which instruments have cells I can raid for the flashlights and radios if the need arises.

    Its awful expensive to waste these in toys and high-use items though. Best use the dollar-store alkalines for those.

    It puzzles me as to why anyone messes with the old carbon-zinc chemistry anymore, but judging by the battery rack, its still popular.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  31. Hari Seldon by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

    How you can you create nuclear batteries if Hari Seldon isn't even born yet. You lack a Foundation in psychohistory.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  32. Battery life by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    I have never seen a AA battery that wasn't sucked dead in a few years just from the internal resistance of the battery itself. I suppose they're are referring to lithium batteries.
     

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
    1. Re:Battery life by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      The probably just took the power draw of the thing, mutiplied it by 307,584,000 (seconds in 10 years) and saw it was around the theoretical capacity of the highest rated rechargable they could find.
      This is marketing, they don't know a battery (especially a rechargable one) doesn't last that long.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    2. Re:Battery life by pclminion · · Score: 1

      If that does happen it's probably because the device itself has some high but not infinite resistance when powered off. Anecdote is not data, but I very commonly find alkaline batteries which work after a decade, and in the most extreme case I found a flashlight stored away in my mother's things which had been sitting there since 1984 and still worked fine. That's 28 years.

  33. I'd like batteries that last 10 years by BitZtream · · Score: 0

    Nothing on the market today does, its not that they can't last a long time, its that they are designed not to, not so much cause they'll make more money because your batteries go bad, but because most people won't wait that long to use them and its far far cheaper to make batteries that last plenty long enough for the common use rather than things where you really do want them to last a long time.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  34. But what about the price by aXis100 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Great. But how about they release a chipset that doesnt cost the earth in licensing fees, so that we can finally buy Bluetooth devices for less than $100.

    I swear every time I look at mice and keyboards, proprietary 2.4GHz gear can be as low as $20 and you can get something very good for $50 or $60, but anything with Bluetooth is instantly $100 plus. It's the biggest barrier to adoption that I know.

    1. Re:But what about the price by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yes, not even Amazon has any sub-100 dollar bluetooth mice. And the certainly have no sub-100 dollar bluetooth keyboards either!

      And don't even get me started on Apple and their price gouging 100$+ mice, keyboards and trackpads! Granted, I can't find any 100$+ keyboards, mice or trackpads on Apple's store, but I'm sure they're there! It's not like you'd just pull that 100$+ number out of your ass, right?

    2. Re:But what about the price by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      or sub 100 phones with bt.. unsubsidized.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:But what about the price by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      I bought a USB bluetooth adapter for something like 0.75p recently (about $1) including postage! They can't be gouging that much....

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    4. Re:But what about the price by jittles · · Score: 1

      are you kidding me? You can buy $10 bluetooth mice from Dell all the time. I use one on my HTPC.

    5. Re:But what about the price by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      it's a joke because there's(at least supposed to be) no licensing fees for bluetooth, just the hw cost.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:But what about the price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er... the Apple wireless keyboard (BT) is 69$ http://www.apple.com/keyboard/

  35. Bluetooth Devices? by cjmnews · · Score: 1

    Will it have the same 40% extra cost for the Bluetooth name like the rare bluetooth mice do?

    Can this Bluetooth Keyboard also hang for 10 seconds twice a day like my Microsoft Bluetooth mouse does?

    Will the Keyboard last the 10 years or just the battery?

    I miss my Logitech Bluetooth mouse, too bad the buttons didn't last more than 3 years....

    --
    You can lose something that is loose, so tighten the loose item so you don't lose it.
  36. Harvest energy from keystrokes by aisrael · · Score: 1

    Add some piezo-electric thingie and harvest energy every time the user presses a key.

  37. Only ten years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Model M I am using right now is 18 years old and shows no sign of decay.

  38. Encryption by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about encryption? I don't want to broadcast my passwords into the aether. And will the today chosen encryption be good enough to resist attacks in ten years?

  39. Until they leak :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Two AA batteries lasting 10 years, lol.

  40. 10 Years lifetime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now don't get me wrong a wireless keyboard running off a batter fro 10 years is nice but calling that the lifetime of the product is an insult to the keyboard I'm currently typing this on. It came with a computer I bought in early 1995.
    USB? Windows keys? Bah! Back in my day we typed up hill both ways over PS/2 and we liked it!

  41. why not power it with keys' movements? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    honest question.... couldn't we somehow have it power itself from the movement of the keys being pressed? maybe using those crazy piezoelectric thingies.

  42. This better be a mechanical keyboard by sandytaru · · Score: 1

    I have a tendency to destroy cheaper keyboards in about a year's time (I am a heavy typer...) Unless they make the darn thing sturdy enough to survive constant use for the course of a decade, it doesn't matter how long you have the battery last.

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
  43. 10 years... by AdamJS · · Score: 1

    If you don't actually type anything.

    1. Re:10 years... by islisis · · Score: 1

      In which case it could've passed this test even without the battery ;)

  44. Energy harvesting by WDancer · · Score: 1

    Why even have batteries if it is so low power. You know, with all the tapping on a keyboard, why can't they put in a kinetic energy harvesting chip like the one's I have been seeing in tech journals lately. Or even a little solar panel like Logitech's solar keyboard.

  45. 10 year life for a keyboard... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A keyboard that only works for 10 years is somewhat sad. Rubber dome keyboards have made people accept a shorter duration on a peripheral product that for the most part hasn't changed much in it's life cycle (connective interface aside).

    I guess I am probably just getting old and touting the mechanical keyboard flag, but my Dell AT101W is 15 years old and still trucking. In short, I like the idea of a bluetooth keyboard, I just wish these new technologies didn't get shoved into a consumer line of temporary products.

  46. Next problem... by TemporalBeing · · Score: 1

    ...battery corrosion thereby breaking the keyboard.

    --
    Truth is like the sun. You can shut it out for a time, but it ain't goin' away. - Elvis Presley (source: imdb.com)
  47. consider the design and price by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I consider the design and price rather than the life. Those usb keyboard from hkcolordigital is really worth to buy.