Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: My Company Wants Me To Astroturf, Should I?

An anonymous reader writes "Posting as AC for obvious reasons. The company I work for put an app in an app store. The marketing people think it isn't selling very well, so they sent out an email asking people to get on all their social media sites and friend or like the app to build up traffic. The thing is, most of the employees have not used the app, but we are being asked to say that we like it. We just saw stories about companies not being allowed to ask employees or interview candidates for access to social sites, but what does it mean when a company asks employees to astroturf? Will the marketing or HR people look at who has astroturfed, and who has not at raise time? How would you deal with this?"

391 comments

  1. Wow... by grub · · Score: 5, Funny

    Things are that bad at RIM and AppWorld, eh?
    Look, if Thorsten wants you to astroturf, he should at least offer some examples.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fuck off, Ballmer.

  2. Find another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    liars are liars.

    1. Re:Find another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      liars are liars.

      only until the go pro by winning an election.

    2. Re:Find another job by g0bshiTe · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Then they aren't liars they are pro they become politicians.

      --
      I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
    3. Re:Find another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh bullshit. Show me someone that doesn't lie, and I'll show you another liar. And this isn't like they asked you to lie to your spouse about infidelity.

      The important question here is, "was there an implicit 'or else' on the end of that email from marketing". If not, then shut up and get back to work because there's nothing to whine about... and you know it.

      If so, you should be looking for a new job.

      That's the real question.

    4. Re:Find another job by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the nub - if you're enthusiastic about the product and talk about it in a non-spammy way, in context, then it's not astroturfing, and it's arguably better advertising. I used to work as a science book buyer and wrote a blog reviewing the coolest ones I read, with due disclosure of the job I did. It gave a lot of publicity to the product I was selling.

      Go posting spam on boards and twitter or whatever and it's not only annoying, it's just plain unimaginative on your bosses' part.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    5. Re:Find another job by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Well they are not telling them to find all the negative press and pretend to be a average consumer and refute it. Spreading the word is different from false and misleading advertising.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:Find another job by Compaqt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, I mean, if you don't even minutely like the product you're working on, you probably should find another job.

      You had a hand in the product, no? There's some minor level of satisfaction, correct? That's all they're asking you to do: tell the world about the product.

      On the other hand, if you want to keep your purity intact by not pimping a horrible product, how pure are you by taking income which comes from the sale of said product?

      --
      I'm not a lawyer, but I play one on the Internet. Blog
    7. Re:Find another job by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      You picked the right word there, 'DISCLOSURE'. No body really gives a crap if you astroturf on behalf of your company as long as you disclose your interest. You can stretch the truth and exaggerate a little as long as you do it in your name and disclose your interest.

      Don't hide your direct interests in the product or company you are promoting, do go overboard in spreading the message and there's not a problem.

      However when you choice to deceive right from the get go, hide or lie about your interests, run multiple accounts, flood the place with lies, well, the expect people to target you and especially what you are promoting with a concerted extended counter marketing campaign that will cost far more than you hope to gain and the number of people making that effort will simply overwhelm anything your firms marketdroids hope to achieve.

      First up try out the product, get to know it really well, so you know what you are talking about and never attack people who complain about your product ie don't become an Apple dick.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Find another job by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree. Nothing brings me more satisfaction than selling somebody on a product that I believe in. Unfortunately the vast majority of sales people out there are peddling crap or scams.

    9. Re:Find another job by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      I have noticed that dedicated liars like to assume that everyone else is a liar too. Despite what you may want to believe there actually are people who would only lie to save their own life or some other emergency situation. I haven't encountered many scenarios where lying was a life or death decision.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    10. Re:Find another job by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      I would say that if you're not prepared to support your company's product in any reasonable way, you should look for another job anyway.

      Unless this is a "find the victim" app for paedophiles or something, why shouldn't you promote it? Now, if your company is asking you to do something against a web site's TOS then just don't, and explain why to your marketing department.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Find another job by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I have noticed that dedicated liars like to assume that everyone else is a liar too. Despite what you may want to believe there actually are people who would only lie to save their own life or some other emergency situation. I haven't encountered many scenarios where lying was a life or death decision.

      I suppose you're one of those people who, when asked how you are feeling, proceed to enumerate the various physical and mental ailments afflicting you. The rest of us just say "fine" and get on with things..

      Similarly, replying with the absolute truth to questions like "does my bum look big in this?" will probably ensure you remain a virgin for your entire life.

      Some lying is necessary for society to tun smoothly.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    12. Re:Find another job by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      never attack people who complain about your product ie don't become an Apple dick.

      But since all Apple products are perfect, by definition if you criticise them you are just a troll and deserve to be mercilessly attacked.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    13. Re:Find another job by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I wholeheartedly agree. Nothing brings me more satisfaction than selling somebody on a product that I believe in. Unfortunately the vast majority of sales people out there are peddling crap or scams.

      If you want to be a rich salesman your primary motivation should be closing the sale, not worrying about the product.

      And if you don't want to be a rich salesman there's not much point being a salesman at all. No one does it because they think they're making the world a better place.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    14. Re:Find another job by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

      If you want to be a rich salesman your primary motivation should be closing the sale, not worrying about the product.

      How do you sell a product that you know nothing about? Closing a sale takes the concious effort on the part of the buyer, meaning that one has to be convincing to the buyer as well as informative (which of course is impossible if you know little about the product). All I was saying is that most people are not convincing liars so worrying about the product and believing in the product helps everybody come to a mutually beneficial deal much easier.

      No one does it because they think they're making the world a better place.

      Wrong again. Motiviation to do good and profit are not mutually exclusive. Not all people are sociopathic. Even a sociopath can do unintentional good even if their motivations are purely profit driven. This is sort of what capitalism is about. Acceptance that greed will always be a part of the human condition, so if SOME of the time society is better when both parties satiate their desires in a mutually beneficial economic arrangement then we are further ahead as a society.

      In reality though it is far more complicated and messy than that as the Libertarian Utopia doesn't account well and sometimes runs counter to other very human motivations. Surely all salesmen are in it for the money, this is a given, but this doesn't mean their behaviors will run counter to their sense of morality, ethics, and guilt.

    15. Re:Find another job by Shirogitsune · · Score: 1

      Some lying is necessary for society to tun smoothly.

      That all depends upon the protocol. SSH does not tolerate lying very well.

    16. Re:Find another job by Cogita · · Score: 2

      I would say that if you're not prepared to support your company's product in any reasonable way, you should look for another job anyway.

      Well, for any large company, it's possible, indeed likely, that I may be immensely proud of the project I am working on, while simultaneously either being unaware or even actively disliking the product of another department of a company.

      --
      -- "The Price of Freedom of Speech, of Press, or of Religion is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish."
    17. Re:Find another job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you just don't want to "Like" it in your facebook or whatever? What if the company said to get all your friends to "Like" it from their facebook accounts too. Would you try to convince all your friends to "Like" your company's facebook page? Probably not. And hopefully that wouldn't negatively affect how you are thought of in your position. I know this isn't originally about facebook but it could very well be.

    18. Re:Find another job by wintersdark · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what TV would have you believe, you can be entirely honest without saying stupid shit that offends people.

      Remaining silent is the easiest method, of course. Or just employ tact: "Does my bum look fat in this?" "Eh, I prefer ~some other article of clothing~, it really highlights your ~whatever~, that sort of thing.

      It's not hard at all to be honest and not be an asshole, or feel the need to speak every thought that enters your head.

      --
      Meh.
    19. Re:Find another job by djp928 · · Score: 1

      You're just changing the subject to avoid a lie, though, and any person with more than two brain cells to rub together would call you out on that. The direct question was "Does this make my butt look fat." That's a yes or no question. You either lie to avoid conflict, or you tell the truth and suffer the consequences. Changing the subject isn't answering the question.

    20. Re:Find another job by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 1

      I suppose you're one of those people who, when asked how you are feeling, proceed to enumerate the various physical and mental ailments afflicting you. The rest of us just say "fine" and get on with things..

      It's perspective, and furthermore the English language allows for large leeway when you consider things like context, tone of voice, body language, etc.

      Ask a millionaire how they are doing, and he may answer fine.
      Ask some hungry kid in a 3rd world country who has only ever known hunger, and he might very well still answer "fine".
      Ask somebody who just had a heartattack how they're feeling and you might get an overly sarcastic "oh just fine." Or maybe even a sincere "great" if they're happy to be alive.

      I would not call any of the above people liars, even though their present situations are vastly different.

    21. Re:Find another job by Defenestrar · · Score: 1

      You can always burst out in song, answer truthfully, and get off with just a laugh: "I like ... and can not lie."

    22. Re:Find another job by wintersdark · · Score: 1

      No, you're not changing the subject to avoid a lie. You are answering her question, but in a way that isn't offensive.

      Instead of dodging the question, you are implying that yes, indeed, those pants make her bum look fat; but instead of delivering what amounts to an insult, you are delivering a (sincere!) compliment.

      Leaving haha-funny-evil-trapping-woman meme's aside, I've never encountered anyone that doesn't appreciate this approach.

      If someone presses you to answer specifically yes or no to a loaded question like that, then the problem is theirs: either they are being deliberately confrontational, or you've failed to convey what you wish to convey (tact; not evasion!)

      If they are being confrontational, they'll know if you lie anyways, and you've got much larger problems overall.

      --
      Meh.
    23. Re:Find another job by nobodie · · Score: 1

      This argument has been used, let me explain why you are wrong.

      The fatal flaw in your argument ( and it is not new to you,) is that you assume that, to follow your example, when someone says "does my bum look big in this?" they are not really asking what the question appears to ask. Their real question is , possibly, depending on person and circumstances, something like: "Do I look good in this?" or maybe even "Do you think I look good (no matter what I am wearing)?"

      These are the real questions, the questions that the person doesn't feel empowered to ask, for whatever reason. If you answer the real question, with the real answer (something like: "you look great in that and it makes you look perfect" or " Noooo, that is not the right thing for you at all), and the person is someone you care about, then there is no problem. If you, for whatever reason, are so small and weak and sad that you have to use the occasion to hurt the person asking by "telling the truth" then you are not telling the truth, you are deliberately trying to make yourself larger by putting someone else down. You are being a pedantic bitch (or prick, whichever you prefer).

      I am not saying that you personally are like that, but this is how the basic idea of truth-telling became besmirched by people who used the words "I'm just telling the truth!" because they weren't.

      It takes someone thoughtful and caring to tell the real truth, most people have trouble caring or thinking that much, it is difficult, it is work and it is worthwhile.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    24. Re:Find another job by Blue23 · · Score: 1

      I would say that if you're not prepared to support your company's product in any reasonable way, you should look for another job anyway.

      Sure, I will support in a reasonable way. But perjuring myself, using non-work-related accounts, is not reasonable. At the very least, I'm lying to friends and family (having no experience with it but saying it's good).

      --
      LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  3. when asked to commit propaganda by berashith · · Score: 5, Funny

    there is only one answer ...
    We are building a fighting force of extraordinary magnitude. We forge our tradition in the spirit of our ancestors. You have our gratitude

    1. Re:when asked to commit propaganda by medcalf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's all give Dr Krawhn a hand.

      --
      -- Two men say they're Jesus. One of them must be wrong. - Dire Straits
    2. Re:when asked to commit propaganda by jbezorg · · Score: 1

      Bulkus!

      --
      I've lost all my marbles except one & It's fun to test angular & centripetal acceleration in my skull
    3. Re:when asked to commit propaganda by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      The answer is clear: send Marketing to Detroit.

    4. Re:when asked to commit propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Send the Marketers to... Detroit!

    5. Re:when asked to commit propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the past year, over 800,000 Americans have died. Despite millions of dollars of research, death continues to be our nation's number one killer.

    6. Re:when asked to commit propaganda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would, but I'm a Gemeni, so *ssssst*

  4. Are you loyal? by pak9rabid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Putting the obvious moral issues aside, how loyal to this company are you? If the answer is "not very" then I think you already know what you should be doing (i.e, looking for another place of employment). If, however, you are a loyal employee, then suck it up & just do what they ask...finding a place to work that you actually enjoy is tough, especially in this economy.

    1. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > .finding a place to work that you actually enjoy is tough, especially in this economy.

      LIES!
      Perpetuated by THE MAN!

    2. Re:Are you loyal? by pak9rabid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Additionally, you may want to check the app-store-in-question's contractual obligations, as I'm pretty sure stuff like astroturfing is against it. Just point out to whoever's in charge that what you're being asked to do violates their policies and could potentially result in your company's app being pulled off of their app store altogether.

    3. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You know, I'd go for the 3rd option. Just don't do it. I'm regularly asked to plug some thing where I work, and I just don't unless I really like whatever it is. I've never been approached as "I saw you didn't post about X". Most of the time, there are so many people in the company that it doesn't matter... If they do ask, it's really none of their business. It's your social networking account, not a company one. I don't see why they should have any jurisdiction over it.

    4. Re:Are you loyal? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Putting the obvious moral issues aside, how loyal to this company are you? If the answer is "not very" then I think you already know what you should be doing (i.e, looking for another place of employment). If, however, you are a loyal employee, then suck it up & just do what they ask...finding a place to work that you actually enjoy is tough, especially in this economy.

      Plus if they do come to ask about your astroturfing creds (they probably won't give two shits so none of this matters anyway) just tell them you do all of your product commentary as AC (for obvious reasons). And when you use the word obvious be sure to draw out the "O". They will know what you mean.

    5. Re:Are you loyal? by Obfuscant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just point out to whoever's in charge that what you're being asked to do violates their policies and could potentially result in your company's app being pulled off of their app store altogether.

      That really looks like you are making the threat to report the company to the app store.

    6. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, do it or find another job? Rofl...

      To the OP:
      They won't *know* unless you have your boss or some snitch of a coworker as a friend/connection/platform-specific-"friend"-term-here. Don't do it if you don't want to. Even if your company has a 100,000 employees, 10% of those having 10 friends, or hell even 100, each buying your app won't even be a drop in the bucket unless it's a ridiculously priced app (which, if it is I can bet why no one is buying it!). It's a desperate move on your employers' part. Just let the app die and let them hopefully (probably won't though) learn about building shitty apps.

    7. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMHO, it is all about timing. In the jobs market at the moment, there is a lot of unemployment and employers have the upper hand. In short, it's a buyers market. Hold your nerve and wait until the economy picks up i.e. when it is the sellers market then move on. That's my humble advice altough I don't know if this is good but I've had my fingers burnt by too many people who love to mouth off but don't practice what they preach. I'm not saying that the commenter I am replying to is that sort of person, all I am saying is that don't lets morals get in the way of good judgement. As to the moral question of what you are doing, all you need to do is the bare minimum which is to play the game in order to keep your job, which won't be too hard considering the limited intelligence involved in the policy of astroturfing to promote a product. If it fails you won't get blamed, it will be the person who thought of the idea.

      To pick up on the morality of this, as to people who are fooled into buying the product because of your activies, there needs to a line drawn if people spend their money on a product and then complain because they haven't fully looked into it.. People have to take responsbility for the decisions they take. I appreciate this sounds black and white but there is only so much you can do.

    8. Re:Are you loyal? by tiberus · · Score: 2

      Ya, you might want to con somebody else into doing that for you. My assumption would be that they are well aware of the Terms and Conditions and are simply choosing to ignore them. Taking this action, however noble is likely to lead to Moral Option #1 (find a new job) against your will. If your company is large enough to have a legal or ethics department, that is where I would take this but, all the aforementioned risk still applies.

    9. Re:Are you loyal? by TheViffer · · Score: 1

      At the same time you might get pulled off a payroll too ...

      --
      -- Knowing too much can get you killed, but knowing who knows too much can make you rich.
    10. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is called a "risk to the business". If you rely on your app being in the app store to make money and to pay salaries then why would you participate in an act that might get the app removed from the app store?

      Apps worthy of purchase float to the top eventually, no need to fake it. If your app doesn't float to the top then it probably isn't that good of an app and someone else is doing the exact same thing and probably doing a better job at it.

    11. Re:Are you loyal? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 2

      unless you're a programmer, in which case you can forget all this nonsense about the economy, unemployment, buyer's market, etc.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    12. Re:Are you loyal? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That is my opinion of the subject. If you like the app, definitely support your company. If you don't like the app, just don't do anything. I've been places that they ask you to do that, and frankly, I can't be bothered unless I really like it. I've never had anyone call me out on it.

      If they do call you out on it, it depends on how much you need the job right now, and what they will do to you if you don't. In my case, if they did insist, I'd feign ignorance of the requirement, and immediately promise to look into it, still fail to do it, and see if they notice. At that point, marketing eventually moves on to something else. If they do get deadly serious, apologize profusely for my oversight, put it up immediately and then start looking for another job. When they ask why I left, say something banal and nebulous and leave on good terms. No sense getting people like that to hate you, just remove them as carefully from your life as possible and move on.

    13. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In my experience, these sort of requests come from middle-management types who don't actually get how things work. They see a problem (low sales) they think they see something that would help that (improve ratings on the app) and they have access to a resource (employees with social media accounts). They put Solution and Resource together and call it a day. Often times, the hint of ToS or even ethical violations never even enters their mind.

      Of course, that doesn't mean that pointing it out won't still be taken as some sort of negative-nelly threat.

    14. Re:Are you loyal? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Anonymous email from one of those temporary email services like 10-minute mail, then. Then there's no possible way they could tie it to any specific employee.

    15. Re:Are you loyal? by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If they ask, tell the truth. "I posted good comments on all the company controlled social media accounts I have access to"

    16. Re:Are you loyal? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Anonymous email from one of those temporary email services like 10-minute mail, then. Then there's no possible way they could tie it to any specific employee.

      The issue is not how to report them, but that by suggesting that they will be reported by someone and lose access to the app store, you will probably be seen as making a threat. If you intend on reporting them, the last thing you want to say to them is "you could lose your app store access of you violate their terms..." The implication is that someone will report them, and you are currently standing there telling them that what they are doing is reportable.

      Yes, you can do it anonymously, using any number of means. Setting up a gmail account would be easier. But just who do you think the company is going to think reported them? It won't matter if you did or didn't at that point. The threat that they inferred from your statement and the actual report will be linked, and you will be hosed. Even if it is the smarter, quieter non-threatening employees who do make the report.

    17. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you really need two paragraphs to say "They do shoot the messenger. You don't want to be THAT GUY. Get it?"

    18. Re:Are you loyal? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      People have to take responsbility for the decisions they take.

      But companies don't have to take responsibility for the decisions they make.

      To the poster:

      If your company thinks the solution to an app that sucks is to have you astroturf, it's probably not likely that the company is going to be around that long, unless they happen to own a whole lot of patents and can stay in business by suing competitors, in which case they probably aren't going to need your development skills, right?

      Simple advice: GTFO. Your word is all you've got. Once it gets out that you're an astroturfer (and it will) you're going to be wearing a scarlet "A" for "asswipe".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:Are you loyal? by alexander_686 · · Score: 1

      Depends on how you phrase it.

      If you tell the manager that
      1. You have reviewed the terms of the social media site and
      2. They donâ(TM)t allow astroturfing (find a better phrase) and
      3. You are concerned about the companyâ(TM)s reputation, so
      4. Thank you but no

      You are not threating them. You not saying that you are going to term them in and that in fact you are a team player.

      If the employer has any sense of ethics you will be fine.

      As a side note, something like this happened to me. It was not astroturfing, but the manager was trying to push a idea that was very very grey. Half a year later when there was a reorg I was kicked out. In the end it all turned out well, butâ¦.

    20. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      K then...How about saying something to the effect of "Astroturfing is obvious and we will be reported(by some random loser on the internet with nothing better to do)"?
      There, now you look like your genuinely concerned and totally not a snitch.

    21. Re:Are you loyal? by EdIII · · Score: 4, Funny

      I just tell them that I have no Facebook or Twitter account at all. Sometimes they look at me like I am lying and then I remind them that I am in IT and that we have no friends, as they so often claim :)

      Works every time. I don't get asked by marketing to have anything to do with the "Social Networking".

    22. Re:Are you loyal? by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 2
      Why would you report it anonymously and lose out on any $$$ from a whistleblower claim when they start looking around for whoever "must have done it?"

      Report it to your attorney-general, to the blogs you're being asked to astroturf, and to the app store in question. It's consumer fraud.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    23. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This. Completely this. I love my company, and I love the product/service we offer(online music subscription by the name of Rhapsody). However, when asked to spread information about our product in ways that are not true(for instance, liking or sharing links to some mobile version of our app which I never use and have no knowledge about), I simply don't. I won't lie about myself or the product I helped create. I will not sell my soul for a few extra subscribers who have been deceived into making a purchase. If my company ever insisted that I did, I'd refuse even in the face of losing my job. Fortunately, my employer is awesome so I can hold the moral high ground without any extra cost, but I'd act and preach the same even if that weren't the case. I can only imagine selling ones own integrity when things are extremely dire, and food and shelter for oneself and family are at risk(even then, I'd probably be very stubborn about it). Otherwise, it is just not worth it.

    24. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why don't you just try the app? If you like it, you can share it on your facebook (assuming you're the type that would normally do so), and if you don't, you can provide your feedback like this: "I really want to share this app with my friends and such, but I can't, because there are some flaws that I really think we should try to fix. Here's what they are, with steps to reproduce. If we can fix these, I think I can recommend it in good conscience, and more importantly, our user base will begin to market on our behalf."

    25. Re:Are you loyal? by AngryDeuce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I meant to send an anonymous email to the higher-ups, not to the app store, warning them about the fact that what they're asking the employees to do is immoral and possibly even illegal. Obviously they're going to know that it came from an employee, but how would they ever possibly prove which one? Witch trials?

      I mean, unless there's some sort of notoriety or compensation desired here, why does the employees name ever have to be attached to anything at all? He's got a moral issue with something his employer is asking him to do; he can send an anonymous warning to the PHB now and, depending on whether it's ignored or the directive is rescinded, he can follow up with an anonymous warning to the app store in question about the astroturfing going on. If even that's not enough, he can post anonymously on the internet on forums and communities like /., not to mention in the app store itself.

      If the OP works for a very small firm I can see how this may not be worth the risk, but if the OP is but one of many employees, there's really nothing I can think of they could do to possibly find out where the emails were coming from or who wrote them. I've even sent anonymous emails to employers in the past myself concerning things that were illegal or unethical. Sometimes something came of them, sometimes not, but at the end of the day, if you see something that is unethical, immoral, and especially illegal, I feel that you have a responsibility to bring it to people's attention, even if the person is signing your paychecks. The warning is just a courtesy.

      I mean, how disrespectful can an employer be that they would ask their employees to do shit like this in the first place? Everyone here knows it's wrong, there's no question or ambiguity here. Clearly the OPs employer doesn't respect them if he'd put them in an ethical bind like this in the first place. Even though ethics and business are considered mutually exclusive these days, that doesn't make it right, nor acceptable. People need to be reminded of that.

    26. Re:Are you loyal? by crutchy · · Score: 1

      except if you want to keep your job its often better to tow the company line.

      employees once risked their lives on a daily basis for their employer in the days before occupational health and safety regulation and enforcement

      nowadays an employer could be sued if an employee got a paper cut (admittedly probably only the US legal system is stupid enough to award damages for a paper cut but you get my drift)

      what is the risk to you for astroturfing? if you get caught by your friends (you probably will) you just say you were doing your job (which will probably be obvious anyway since nobody in their right mind astroturfs without being paid... unless you're an apple fanboi but then i did say anyone "in their right mind"). if you get caught by a competitor, you might risk landing a new job offer. legally there is no risk to you personally (except if your employer goes under you'll lose your job I guess, but so will everyone else including those in the company that didn't astroturf).

    27. Re:Are you loyal? by Isaac-1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      One more take on it, maybe the company is not doing so good in this economy, and are asking their employees to help drum up business so they don't have to lay people off, etc.

    28. Re:Are you loyal? by Idbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Independent of liking or not the app. I wonder why having an app, the people in the company haven't used yet. If the employees don't support their company and at least try their products... what kind of employees they have in first place.

      If that's the main product, and the employees won't use it then it makes no sense.
      If it's not and it's supposed to help the employees with something, then why people doesn't try it.
      If it is informational only, why not just using a website and call it done!

      Seriously, doesn't seem to me that it's a problem of only the "company" or the "developers" or perhaps just "PR".

    29. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your company thinks the solution to an app that sucks is to have you astroturf, it's probably not likely that the company is going to be around that long

      Don't kid yourself. Companies like these can be around for a long time. I used to work for a company where the CEO told the head of PR to astroturf. It turned out that he was so unused to deceitfulness that the CEO went out and hired someone else to do it. It's alright, though. The PR guy has decided that getting paid is worth his dignity. By the time I left, he was slowly adopting the CEO's view on things.

      The thing about this company is that it's the regional arm of a larger international firm. This parent company doesn't really care how things are done as long as the drama doesn't touch them. And the way things are structured, it won't. That means the regional company will be around as long as it's profitable. The longer I go, the more I realize that companies like these don't get bought out, go bankrupt, or even fade away. They just keep chugging along, screwing people left and right to make a profit.

    30. Re:Are you loyal? by sdguero · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yep. I was nearly fired when I pointed out (at my manager's suggestion) to the execs that the smallish (~250 employees) company was throwing hazardous materials in the dumpster, and could be fined for it under CA law. The big wigs saw it as a threat and my manager had to convince them I was only looking out for their best interests, not trying to be a whistle blower or make money off them. And of course, they did nothing once they figured out I was just trying to help and not get a lawsuit going.

    31. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also go part way and share it on facebook, but only with the people you think would like to see it, such as other employees at your company. But that begs the question - if you aren't passionate about the products your company makes enough to WANT to tell your friends about them, you should probably should look around for other opportunities.

    32. Re:Are you loyal? by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      That really looks like you are making the threat to report the company to the app store.

      It's safer to use a disposable email, cobble together a form letter 'from the app store' detailing what part of the TOS they would be violating and advising that they strongly consider ethical marketing practices in lieu of unethical behavior.

      Drop that F bomb into the global distribution email if they're dumb enough to have that open. Otherwise send it to the legal department, the CEO, the CFO and your companies 'loud larry'.

      Quickly trash the address and whistle happily on your way to work.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    33. Re:Are you loyal? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I haven't ever heard of anyone being unfairly targeted for not spreading the kool-aid around when asked (or, more commonly, implied) that would be welcome.

      If you really care about it, install the app, see if it's actually as good as they say it is, and if so, write a honest account of your experience with it. But if you really don't have any first hand experience, don't lie about it to others. Aside from the obvious ethical issues inherent in this, it can be downright trivial to get caught up in a lie (if, say, you'll have to answer to a comment by a disgruntled customer, and your unfamiliarity with the app in question becomes evident from your follow-up), and rest assured that the people who are asking you to lie will not stand by you in that case. So even from the "job security" / "it's bad, but I've gotta feed the kids, man" angle alone, it's a bad idea.

    34. Re:Are you loyal? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      One more take on it, maybe the company is not doing so good in this economy, and are asking their employees to help drum up business so they don't have to lay people off, etc.

      If that were the case, I doubt the original poster would have been so uncomfortable with it.

      Apps that are worthwhile but aren't selling are a lot more rare than junk that's got a spam campaign behind it.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    35. Re:Are you loyal? by Lord+of+the+Fries · · Score: 1

      Not all apps are apps for us developers though. Perhaps they're developing a medical imaging app for doctors... how much can one of their developers really use this and find out if it fits the bill or not...

      --
      One man's pink plane is another man's blue plane.
    36. Re:Are you loyal? by irving47 · · Score: 3, Funny

      CA law?
      Let me guess.. A stick of chewed gum in the foil wrapper?
      An ethernet cable with a bad crimp?

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
    37. Re:Are you loyal? by sdguero · · Score: 2

      Old computer monitors, florescent light bulbs, and batteries mostly. All they needed to do was put a bin in the receiving dock for hazardous materials and have the maintenance guy take it to the dump a couple times a year. The reason I pointed it out was because I read an article on the new laws and a new state enforcement agency that was checking dumpsters outside office buildings and levying big fines (like $1500 per computer monitor or something)...

      Anyway that was several years ago and that company went down the toilet in 2009, mostly due to inept upper management.

    38. Re:Are you loyal? by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      I am passionate about my ability to architect great network and server infrastructures, as well as developing good processes and specifications to make best use of the former. I may not be quite as excited about the actual application running on My Precious, even if it is what pays for my blade chassis, fat pipes, and storage arrays.

      I used to work for one of the financial companies that everyone loves to hate (for good reason), but they sure did have some kick ass equipment. Stuff that you'd never even have a chance to play with anywhere else. The pay was rather decent too. Under no circumstances would I shill any of their products. Even today, some of the internal PR stuff they used to pass out to employees makes me giggle. I still wonder if anyone actually believed the crap they would pass out.

      Luckily for them, they didn't need an engineer to friend them on Facebook to make sales.

    39. Re:Are you loyal? by Billlagr · · Score: 2

      That really looks like you are making the threat to report the company to the app store

      I'd say that depends greatly on the companies culture and your relationship with your superiors and their attitudes towards staff. In this situation, I could quite comfortably approach my boss and point that out, without it looking like a threat, and I'm confident he would take it seriously and investigate it.

    40. Re:Are you loyal? by Fnord666 · · Score: 2

      If the employer has any sense of ethics you will be fine.

      Based on the original question, I think we already have the answer to this one, don't we?

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    41. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right. also, if you are loyal to this company, you might actually consider trying the app. if you like it or think it might be useful to someone, why not 'like it' or 'friend it'? if you don't, then don't. the fact that the OP came here and asked about the legal ramifications of this 'prodding' by Marketing and HR dept....with no indication that he/she ever even tried the app tells me that the OP is NOT loyal to the company and is simply drawing a paycheck at this place...and is hoping to turn the whole situation into a 'get-rich-quick' lawsuit. bad employee.

    42. Re:Are you loyal? by Jessified · · Score: 1

      How about a 4th option. Make new accounts. That is "JohnSmithAtMicrosoft."

      Strictly speaking, you are doing what they said; they asked you to use social media to plug the product, but morally speaking you are in the clear, because even a moron in a hurry would understand that you are shamelessly plugging on behalf of your company.

    43. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's exactly right.

      The staff at my workplace take the same approach. They always want ridiculous reports and documentation and blah blah blah. But we began to notice that it made no difference if you did it or not. They don't reward good work and they punish (without good cause) even the most loyal hardworking employees if something goes wrong (we make good scapegoats). Plus they don't even notice whether you do or do not follow their random requests. So best to keep your head down, do the minimum and get paid.

      That's my job though.

    44. Re:Are you loyal? by Jessified · · Score: 1

      Perfect response.

    45. Re:Are you loyal? by Jessified · · Score: 1

      That's true. Good point.

      But hopefully they are making a product that people want, and that you can feel good about plugging. Otherwise, tricking people into buying the product is only going to amplify the problem.

    46. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anonymous email from one of those temporary email services like 10-minute mail, then. Then there's no possible way they could tie it to any specific employee.

      If they suspect you, and you live in a state like Florida, then your company can just fire you at any time without giving you a reason. They don't have to prove anything.

    47. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not in the army, why can't he just say "no" and be done with it?

    48. Re:Are you loyal? by godglike · · Score: 1
      Nope, just informing your colleagues of potential problems.

      if they interpret that as a threat that is their problem.

    49. Re:Are you loyal? by godglike · · Score: 1

      third option: enclose the astroturfing in astroturf tags

      <astroturf>XYZ App is the greatest thing ever. It completely paradigm shifted my synergy</astroturf>

      You've complied with the company request and made it obvious that it is not your own writing/feelings.

    50. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The company I once worked for asked everybody to like company Facebook posts. They then laid half the staff off when wasting employees' time did not drum up business. They then had ebook reader giveaways on Facebook.
      Bill Hicks hit the nail on the head - marketing is bullshit and people who make a living in marketing are the scum of the earth.

    51. Re:Are you loyal? by LifeIs0x2A · · Score: 1

      Very sensible comment. I think this is definitely not a matter worth risking bad vibes with anyone. Just play it easy. If your normal work in the company is ok, I don't think they will give you any real trouble for not advertising them on your private accounts.

    52. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you're actually doing due diligence and noting what your exposure is.

    53. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What sort of moral issue is there with pimping your own company's products? If you feel queasy about recommending something you haven't tried, then you could, I dunno, try it.

    54. Re:Are you loyal? by cbope · · Score: 1

      If it's your own personal Facebook or Twitter account, I would tell them it's a personal account for personal use and not for work. I have a personal Facebook account but I clearly keep that separated from work. I don't post work-related topics there at all, and if you do do that on your personal account, you are asking for trouble.

    55. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, however, you are a loyal employee, then suck it up & just do what they ask..

      No, fuck that right up the nose.

      This is at the very least unethical for them to ask, and potentially criminal. As for what you post, they're asking you to lie, which could get you in trouble down the road.
      What you need right now is actual legal advice, go talk to an attorney and/or file an anonymous complaint with the Wage and Labor department, or depending on the company the local Public Service Commission might work better, other spots to try are the FCC, FTC, BBB, etc.

    56. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more take on it, maybe the company is not doing so good in this economy, and are asking their employees to help drum up business so they don't have to lay people off, etc.

      Yes, that's what he said, they are sucking to the point they're hoping to get business through astroturfing. They obviously are having trouble competing, GTFO now. Let Isaac-1 ruin his reputation, violate his ethics, and potentially commit a crime just to possibly keep his job for another few months before it tanks completely. It's one less person you're competing against in the job market, and you'll hopefully have a new job right about the time Isaac-1 stops posting here because he can't afford his internet bill.

    57. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ever reported sexual harassment to an HR person or a dean? The chances of an investigator keeping the source of the report anonymous are *zero*. Even if they mean well, it's too easy to leak timing of the report or details of the report that will lead straight back to you, and for most groups to ask "who would report this"? And once that is discovered, even if you are a stellar employee, expect the next three months of evaluations to list "problems", and to be asked to sign an "agreement" about "issues to work on", and then face "termination with cause" unless you sign a very strong confidentiality agreement. And this *kills* your chances of getting good references for your next job from any managers, who will portray you as "not a team player".

      I've used anonymous reporting. The key to "anonymous reporting", successfully, is to make sure it has enough details to be noticed and be verifiable, but not enough details to lead people straight back to you. In reporting astroturfing, it's to make sure the *astroturfing* report in the blog itself is clear and convincing and remains high enough in the list that it warns people.

    58. Re:Are you loyal? by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

      You make it seem like the employer is somehow abusing their employees, not really. If anything the employer is being terribly foolish.

      As a full time software developer I put in my 40 hours and offsite production support for the agreed upon terms of my salary. My salary is not changing (at least not if they want me to stick around) so however they want to use me in that 40 hours is their business. If that week they would want me clean the office kitchen I would certainly do it in the short term but this would be a terribly wasteful decision on their part.

      They already pay me a lot of money, so they can have me writing quality software or they can put me on cleaning duty despite the fact that they could probably hire about 3-4 full time janitors for what they pay me.

      This same concept applies to astroturfing which has a relatively low cost to outsource to a marketing company. The decision to waste their employees expensive time on such frivolous tasks as astroturfing is a sign of gross mismanagement of resources.

    59. Re:Are you loyal? by maple_shaft · · Score: 1

      The OP's employer is doing far more than just disrespecting their employees. One can make the case they are foolishly and carelessly wasting their employee's hours on a trivial task that many marketing firms charge peanuts for. Their employees work time is a captured asset assuming they are exempt salary so they would be foolish to waste their talents and skills on efforts that are beneath their abilities.

    60. Re:Are you loyal? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      I don't think he owns the company. So it's not 'his' company. Even if he likes the product, pretending not to be a company employee being ordered to post warm and fuzzy fake posts is deception. It is completely unethical. Only a sociopath would feel no guilt at all doing something like that.

      My integrity, the ability to look myself in the mirror without shame, is more important to me than having to quit and take a pay cut working somewhere else. You won't be able to buy back your self-respect and integrity with the extra money you are making. I don't know if you have children or not, but if you did have them would you want them to know that you are deceiving people for money?

      Nevertheless the simplest solution is to just ignore the request and lie to the unethical liars (your employer) if asked. Also, if you notice what you feel is astroturfing you can make an anonymous post (ideally from an internet cafe) admitting that employees of the company have been asked to astroturf. Astroturfing is an unambiguous form of fraud.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    61. Re:Are you loyal? by swalve · · Score: 1

      The reason they balked is that it costs more to haul away hazardous materials, and they were clearly cheap-asses.

    62. Re:Are you loyal? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Or how about AstroturfingForDollars or PaidShill? It's not a bad idea. As long as you disclose your bias astroturfing isn't really astroturfing anymore.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    63. Re:Are you loyal? by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      unless you're a programmer, in which case you can forget all this nonsense about the economy, unemployment, buyer's market, etc.

      Anywhere else I'd assume you were joking, but as this is slashdot I'm not so sure. A lot of people here do seem to believe that their own god-like genius can overcome any hurdle, including the economy and reality itself.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    64. Re:Are you loyal? by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1
      Your argument is entirely bogus. This is a job situation, where if suddenly the employer turns around and starts doing what you said, you have the right to quit and sue for constructive dismissal.

      And any time your employer comes up to you and asks you to sign something that none of your other co-workers is being asked to sign, that's when you take the paper and walk out and say "I'm going home - and you're going to pay me for it - until such time as you reverse this or I'll see you in court." And make sure that several co-workers see it (and if you have half a brain, record it as well).

      Then start looking for another job, knowing that they can't do anything in retaliation from that point on. The only way to clean out the bad actors is for employees to up and quit - otherwise, you make it harder for employers who don't want to engage in such stupidity to say "we don't do this because not only is it wrong, but it often backfires."

      Anyone who doesn't stand up against this when asked is part and parcel of the problem.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    65. Re:Are you loyal? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Simple advice: GTFO. Your word is all you've got. Once it gets out that you're an astroturfer (and it will) you're going to be wearing a scarlet "A" for "asswipe".

      Why? I wouldn't give a flying fish fart if I found out that someone was plugging his own products. That's just business. Truth is irrelevant in business.

      Actual astroturfing in the political sense is a different matter.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    66. Re:Are you loyal? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Bill Hicks hit the nail on the head - marketing is bullshit and people who make a living in marketing are the scum of the earth.

      For better or worse, marketing is the life blood of capitalism. No one needs to buy any iPhone app.

      I agree with Bill Hicks, but I doubt most of the libertarians/fiscal conservatives on slashdot would like to see an end to capitalism any time soon.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    67. Re:Are you loyal? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I think realistically the company would be expecting employees to use their own time (lunch or after work) for this, not to sit around in the office posting on facebook instead of working.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    68. Re:Are you loyal? by laughingcoyote · · Score: 1

      Absolutely agreed. I've told my boss on several occasions that client requests would violate our audit requirements if we fulfill them. I just approach it very calmly, pointing out what we would be doing and what that would breach. He's been nothing but appreciative of that, even when it's led to the necessity of a difficult conversation with the client. In other cases, I've been able to find ways to get the client what they want without causing a violation.

      Accidentally making such a request without understanding its full implications is one thing. It's likely the person asking the original question here had nothing more than a clueless marketing department who have no idea astroturfing is prohibited by almost every site/app host out there, and hopefully, cluing them in will be all that's needed to put an end to it. On the other hand, if they're so ethically challenged that they'd persist or try to go under the radar even knowing that, it's time to blow the whistle.

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    69. Re:Are you loyal? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Yes, but did they go down the toilet because of the crippling fines they had to pay? Otherwise there is no correlation between their unethical behaviour and their financial performance.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    70. Re:Are you loyal? by Jessified · · Score: 1

      That's the point. The company didn't ask him to astroturf. He interpreted it that way. The company asked him to promote the product via social media.

      I feel that agreeing to do it and then doing nothing is a better option though.

    71. Re:Are you loyal? by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 1

      when everything crashed in 2008 i got a raise. in the past few months i've turned down resume requests for jobs starting at $120k. i don't want them because i don't want to live where they're paying. that's how god-like my genius is, sir. i make more than enough to live comfortably wherever i go, and i can afford to interview the company that interviews me. i am a programmer.

      --
      insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
    72. Re:Are you loyal? by DJ+Particle · · Score: 1

      Did you have to throw an ad hominem Apple attack in there? It wasn't even relevant! -.-

    73. Re:Are you loyal? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Truth is irrelevant in business.

      Ain't that the truth.

      I guess there never will be a free market solution to dishonesty.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    74. Re:Are you loyal? by crutchy · · Score: 1

      this is slashdot... of course it was necessary, and relevance is irrelevant here.

      ...and why do a lot of people here write "ad hominem"? it may convey what you mean, but you sound like an ivy-league poofter for saying it. why not just say "personal"?

      no need to use latin unless you're quoting monty python

    75. Re:Are you loyal? by crutchy · · Score: 1

      if you're paid to send messages to your friends, since there's a good chance your friends will know what company you work for (mine do), they will know that you're astroturfing for your employer pretty easily and it should be pretty obvious why you would be doing it.

      i don't really understand why astroturfing should be looked at so negatively when its for your employer, since many employees are passionate about their work anyway (if they're lucky) and would happily praise the products/services they are involved in. it may be spam, but promoting your employer would have to be the most innocent and inoffensive form of spam (unless of course you're sole job is to be a spammer).

      if you're in a job where you wouldn't want to astroturf for your employer, maybe you're not happy with them and should be looking for another job regardless.

    76. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the benefit of being slightly paranoid. I do the same as you, except that since I do not have fb/twitter accounts I can be honest about it to my manager.

      Luckily, for me at least, there are jobs where not having such accounts (and not wanting to have them) is virtually a requirement.

    77. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of companies require their employees to use their products because, if there's something bad with the customer experience, then the employees are in the best position to get it fixed.

      It works fairly well, too. Since I own a company, we were in the position to try out all of the business products offered by the bank my wife worked at. The products weren't doing very well, and it didn't take long to see why: the customer experience sucked donkey balls. I mean, Bank of America absolutely kicked their ass, up and down, up and down, all over the place, and that is setting the bar exceptionally low.

      I still have some of their borderline-unacceptable crap because it's priced well, but wow. Garbage.

    78. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look for a job. The only ethical thing to do.

    79. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a bad company, there is no valid excuse for astroturfing.

      Companies that do it are shit.

      Employees that do it are shit.

      People, who think whoring yourself out on your private account is okay, are shit.

      You sir, are shit.

    80. Re:Are you loyal? by Wraithlyn · · Score: 1

      Or maybe he means that, generally speaking, the tech sector has historically been resistant to economic downturns. Nah...

      --
      "Mind, as manifested by the capacity to make choices, is to some extent present in every electron." -Freeman Dyson
    81. Re:Are you loyal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is completely missing the point. "Jurisdiction" is irrelevant, especially when the company has your Facebook password. Companies, via employees and marketing firms, astroturf the living hell out of social media. And why not? Especially when using salaried employees, it is free advertising, all the more valuable because it looks authentic and trustworthy. Some companies follow ethical and legal guidelines when doing all this, but I have seen some astroturfing where this was not done at all. The problem is that viral marketing and astroturfing, unless done in a particularly clumsy and brain-dead manner, are generally indistinguishable from genuinely enthusiastic, two thumbs up musings.

      As I see it, if asked to do something unethical or illegal at work, one is basically left with these choices

      1) Do as you are told regardless of ethics, making sure you CYA and are able to throw someone else under the wheels if you get caught.
      2) Do as you are told regardless of ethics, don't CYA to the max and risk getting busted and totally screwed.
      3) Stand up and say 'This ain't right, we are sailing right towards the iceberg with this one', and deal with the positive or negative fallout.
      4) Go find another company to work for, one with some semblance of good management.

      When considering the above, bear this in mind: If you lie down with dogs, you're gonna wake up with fleas.

      Welcome to 2012. I'm just glad I work for a company where unethical conduct would get one drawn and quartered.

  5. How about advertising? by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whatever happened to advertising a product? Spend money to make money and all that jazz.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:How about advertising? by Jakester2K · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Whatever happened to advertising a product? Spend money to make money and all that jazz.

      Costs too much. Just like in-house beta-testing. That's why the idea was born to release purposely-buggy software and let your (ahem) customers pay for the privilege of doing it for you. It's a small step from there to get people to do your shil... er, advertising for you for free.

      The 21st century version is "Spend less and make more."

    2. Re:How about advertising? by Surt · · Score: 1

      Tolerance has begun to develop among the population. So marketers are looking for new ways into the brain.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    3. Re:How about advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tolerance has begun to develop among the population. So marketers are looking for new ways into the brain.

      It's called "noise". We Americans are bombarded by ads and other marketing that we just tune it out. It affects us when it comes to trends - like wanting a smart phone - but individual products get lost. Unless, you have a highly charismatic marketing person like Steve Jobs.

      The thing is, most of the employees have not used the app, but we are being asked to say that we like it.

      I wonder if this really works. It doesn't on me because I think most people are clueless - I got burned quite a few times in the past from personal recommendations; so I investigate a product first. Everyone in the World or close to it can like something but it has no affect on me - I have no Facebook account, smartphone, or Apple products.

      Then again, I'm probably an outlier.

    4. Re:How about advertising? by jimbolauski · · Score: 3, Informative

      Advertising like the stuff Add-block handles or commercials that are skipped over? Word of mouth is all that is left, and as another plus your employer has directed you in a memo to use social networking sites at work. Now hours of no productivity can be directly attributed to a memo instructing you to do so.

      Honestly I would prepare to leave the company not because of some moral code but for much simpler reasons. If you main revenue stream is selling apps and you are not selling them then the next shoe to fall is layoffs.

      --
      Knowledge = Power
      P= W/t
      t=Money
      Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    5. Re:How about advertising? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 4, Informative

      traditional advertising weakened significantly as people shifted to a 'social' model of judging if they should buy a product. Since the early inceptions of this idea were informative rather than spammy (your friend is playing this game, your brother likes bought this car). It was like a technological word of mouth, with some tools to help spread the word. Word of mouth was always valuable, it was just cost prohibitive to plant fake word of mouth people for everything. Now of course you can use your employees to count as warm bodies for your marketing department as 'likes' for their supposedly social advertising. In some ways this isn't new, how many companies offer employee discounts for example? You want your employees to be advertisers for your products, this just makes it official.

      As a result advertising shifts. If people believe celebrities, hire celebrities, if people believe 'page views' or 'total number of likes' then you find ways to generate those things. If people tend to click the first result of a google search, you're the first result or you're trying to figure out how to get there.

      'Advertising' is trying to get people to know about your product and want to buy it. That changes as technologies change. Right now people still (wrongly) believe that some sort of social liking of a product means it's worth owning, so you pay for that. Sometimes you pay for fake journalists, review scores, or whatever you think people will care about.

      In the case of the OP his job has asked him to perform work as part of his duties. He should make a series of corporate social accounts that are for the employee Sir_Sri_CEOofSriCorp sort of thing. And use those for all company advertising. When his (or her) employment concludes transfer that professional employee persona to the employer, as it was done on their time and is their property.

      One of my friends used to work at a radio station, where she had a brand that wasn't her name. When she left the radio station they claimed (correctly) ownership of the persona she had created at that station as part of her employment there. When she left she couldn't keep the name. She now does voice acting under a similar but not the same persona. (You can dodge this by creating a company that owns the persona you use, and then the contract that hires you hires your company which retains ownership). Someone like stephen colbert manages to maintain decidedly different personal and public profiles, as an employee it doesn't have to e quite as grandiose, but it's basically the same thing.

    6. Re:How about advertising? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In some ways this isn't new, how many companies offer employee discounts for example? You want your employees to be advertisers for your products, this just makes it official.

      There's a fine line here, though. Offering employee discounts and other ways to encourage employees to use the products of the company in hopes of them spreading the word is one thing - they are, after all, actual users of those products, so experience they share is genuine and has basis in reality. Mindlessly reposting the line given to you by marketing, when you have no idea whether it is true or not (or, perhaps, even what it means) is a very different thing - and, arguably, rather unethical.

    7. Re:How about advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a side note, Colbert also owns his brand and contracts himself out to Viacom.

    8. Re:How about advertising? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Right, which is the smart way to do these things. Though he had been in the entertainment business long enough that any past persona's he had may have been claimed elsewhere, or he may have been given good legal advice before making the persona, or busboy productions (jon stewarts production company) might have graciously given or sold him the rights in exchange for something.

    9. Re:How about advertising? by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      What does ethics have to do with it? That's why you have a corporate identity. In my capacity as an employee of X corporation I fully support all activities of said corporation. Any activities taken while on my corporate identity are considered on company time, and you should generally have the good sense to not disparage the corporation you work for.

      Theoretically lawyers, doctors and engineers may have professional ethics obligations which supercede advertising requirements, but if you're in that situation your professional society provides guidance, not /..

    10. Re:How about advertising? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What does ethics have to do with it? That's why you have a corporate identity. In my capacity as an employee of X corporation I fully support all activities of said corporation. Any activities taken while on my corporate identity are considered on company time, and you should generally have the good sense to not disparage the corporation you work for.

      If you repost them on the official company blog / Facebook channel / whatever-else-clearly-identified-as-official, then, of course, it's perfectly fine. And some companies have their own blog systems where any employee can register a blog that he is personally and solely responsible for, but which remains under corporate aegis (e.g. MSDN / Technet) - those are fine, too.

      But TFQ is about people asked to promote using their personal social networking assets - those are in no way connected to their corporate identity.

    11. Re:How about advertising? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      traditional advertising weakened significantly as people shifted to a 'social' model of judging if they should buy a product.

      Guess why that happened. And guess why people regard astroturfers as scum. Astroturf is just fraud (premeditated deception for profit) by another name. People doing it should be in jail.

    12. Re:How about advertising? by damburger · · Score: 1

      This is very good advice, and best for all concerned.

      It also avoids the worst case scenario; that if you use your social network accounts to shill for the company long enough, they might try to claim ownership of them.

      Keep your work and your life separate. They don't own you.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  6. Nope by beMendo · · Score: 1

    Can't say that I would do it.

    1. Re:Nope by vlm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Can't say that I would do it.

      The problem is the original poster, not the policy, at least so far. The original poster is an epic fail because:

      The thing is, most of the employees have not used the app

      You have to do that before you can decide what to do with:

      we are being asked to say that we like it.

      Note that you don't have to like the genre to say the product is best in class, or at least somewhat "like-able". Many years ago I was asked my opinion of an ethnic food product my former employer sold; I can't stand that kind of stuff, but I could honestly say my employers individual product was an excellent example of the genre. If I had to eat this junk in general, this is the one I'd eat. This is your out if the app is something like a female ovulation calendar app or kids educational app or whatever.

      I deleted my facebook account years ago, but the social norm at the time was some dude you sat next to in 8th grade once is a "friend" and anything vaguely novel is "like", so its not as if they're asking you to get a tattoo on your forehead or become a booth babe. The standard for "like" an app is probably "it didn't make my phone catch fire, so thats good enough".

      If its just too rancidly repulsive to appeal to you, or in your opinion, anyone, you need to run like hell and start emailing resumes because:
      1) They're obviously grasping at straws if its so awful they have to pay people $75K/yr (or whatever) to grudgingly admit they like it.
      2) After grasping at straws comes the layoffs, downsizing, bankruptcies, etc, next week. So get a jump to it.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I "like" an app, it probably means, "The app told me if I liked it, it would stop asking me to like it..."

    3. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if you try, and it does what it says it does, then why not promote it? It's your livelihood, isn't it? The only way this becomes a quandary is if the product sucks. Then, as an employee, I'd say it is up to you to make it better.

    4. Re:Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to corporate life. Where those in the engine room meaning nothing and bonuses/credit are given to those at the top getting the bonuses. Freedom in our country....not really. Don't astroturf and can you get fired? Maybe...Your personal account is PERSONAL not something that your company can have access to if you do not want them to. Be careful with your social networks and don't put something out there you don't want someone to know.

  7. Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a fellow anonymous, representing the big E and the A, we get it in our inboxes daily to astroturf our products.

    This seems to be a common practice nowadays, and I guess it shows you have some faith in your product. I have nothing against it as long as you like what you are doing. If you don't like astroturfing for your stuff, then don't.

    What concerns me though is that you seem to be not very keen on this app. Care to elaborate why?

    1. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a fellow anonymous, representing the big E and the A, we get it in our inboxes daily to astroturf our products.

      He's not being asked to astroturf. He's being asked to like the product. Astroturfing is when you post comments to blogs and in other places saying how great the product is ... not unlike the occasional product plug we see here in slashdot. It's a term that comes from a "fake grassroots organization". If you pretend to be some unaffiliated user who posts things like "hey, the solution to your problem is Spiffy Car and Cat wax, it will solve two problems at the same time..." you're astroturfing. If you simply click "like" on Facebook, you're not.

      Do you actually not like the product your company makes, whether you use it or not? If not, don't like it. If so, what's the problem? You're not being fake.

    2. Re:Astroturfing in social media by sosume · · Score: 2

      If you don't like your company's product, you should quit. You should really try to love your company and its products and recommend them to everyone in your acquaintance list. That's what is ultimately paying your paycheck in a few years and also it gives great satisfaction after working somewhere for many years. I agree it's hard to have that kind of relation with a big corporation, but seriously, for a start-up company there's nothing worse for the image than being run by a bunch of cynical bastards who don't believe in their product.

    3. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 0

      "I have nothing against it as long as you like what you are doing."

      By its very nature, astroturfing is dishonest and unethical.

    4. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My company also keeps asking me to recommend their product or ask people to vote for them. But I have no actual contact with anyone who would use my company's product, so I just ignore it. I can't do what they're asking.

    5. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "He's not being asked to astroturf. He's being asked to like the product."

      Astroturfing is astroturfing, no matter the form. Employees are being asked to falsely represent themselves as happily satisfied users of the product. That is astroturfing at its very essence. Whether you are doing it via blog posts or Facebook likes, you are still committing exactly the same ethical breach. There is no difference.

    6. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like your company's product, you should quit.

      LOL

      Posting anonymous for obvious reasons.

    7. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Astroturfing is astroturfing, no matter the form.

      Tautology is the word I'm looking for, I think.

      Employees are being asked to falsely represent themselves as happily satisfied users of the product.

      They are being asked to "like" the product on a social website. This implies nothing about being a user. You have inferred something that isn't there. I like Sugar Smacks. I haven't had any Sugar smacks for twenty years. I would not say I am a "happy user", but I have no problem at all saying I "like" them.

      There is no difference.

      There is a significant difference between posting on a blog under a fake name saying "I use Trojan condoms and I think they are great", and clicking the "like" button on your facebook account. One is fake, one is not. One says you are a happy user, one does not. It's another example of something I do not use but would have no problem recommending to others by "liking" them, because I think they are a good product.

      It is the differences that make the difference. If you can start with a tautology, I can end with one.

    8. Re:Astroturfing in social media by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with clubbing baby seals?

    9. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Brian+Feldman · · Score: 0

      ...and here in the real world, programmers realize that products are generally "niche" and not applicable to the world at large.

      --
      Brian Fundakowski Feldman
    10. Re:Astroturfing in social media by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. He's being asked to POST that he likes the product. Regardless of if he even uses it. Their company is requesting they use their non-work accounts to generate praise. THAT'S ASTROTURF. A cheap version of astroturf where they don't even pay you for shilling for them.

      The ONLY way that this action could be considered anything other than astroturf, is if they clearly state "IF you like the product THEN please remember to leave a review. Please do not feel obligated. We will not be checking." Such a request is common to users.

      But the moment it comes over as an order, or with the implication that there is either punishment or reward, however minor, then it becomes astroturf.

    11. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "They are being asked to "like" the product on a social website. This implies nothing about being a user."

      Sites, not site. And I disagree. Liking does imply endorsement.

      "One is fake, one is not. One says you are a happy user, one does not."

      Not so. If they are not users of the product, "liking" it is misleading at best. It might only be a mild implied endorsement, but nevertheless it implies endorsement.

      "I haven't had any Sugar smacks for twenty years. I would not say I am a "happy user", but I have no problem at all saying I "like" them."

      And here you prove my point for me. You might not BE a "happy user", but you did at least use the product, and you do at least like it.

    12. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      If the person "liking" their company's product on Facebook lists that company as their current employer, then it's much harder to argue that they are claiming to be an ordinary user of the product.

      I believe the meme would be go something like "Steve Ballmer likes Microsoft Windows! Film at 11!"

    13. Re:Astroturfing in social media by pavon · · Score: 1

      They are being asked to "like" the product on a social website. This implies nothing about being a user.

      It implies that you like the product and therefore know enough about it to have formed an opinion, despite the fact that know nothing about it.

      Here is the real tautology: saying you like something is saying you like something whether you do it in words or with a button. Both ways you are lying for money; the only difference is how elaborate the lie is.

    14. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Sites, not site.

      Doing something ethical more than once doesn't, by definition, make it unethical. Doing something unethical more than once doesn't, by definition, make it ethical. Thus, the number of sites is irrelevant to the issue of whether it is ethical or not.

      According to the summary, the person is being asked to go to their "social websites", not every social website on the planet, and not to create fake accounts at social websites. Just go to the ones he already uses. This is a critical difference between this and true astroturfing. The other difference is that he's not being asked to write "glowing reviews" of the product, only click on "like" or similar options on the sites he uses. Also a significant difference from true astroturfing.

      And I disagree. Liking does imply endorsement.

      Who are you disagreeing with? "Liking" is an endorsement, of course. It does not, however, imply anything about being a USER. Only when the endorsement says "I use X and am happy with it" can you claim any statement about use. Just "I like X" doesn't.

      Have you ever seen the JG Wentworth commercials? Do you imagine that every opera singer they've used in those ads has "a long term settlement and I need cash now?" That's what they are saying. Are they all users of JG Wentworth's product? I doubt it. I assume nothing about their use despite them singing happily about it.

      And here you prove my point for me. You might not BE a "happy user",

      How can my NOT being a "happy satisfied user" prove in any way that when I say I like Sugar Smacks that I'm saying I'm a "happy satisfied user"? I'm not. I am not a user, and it is NOT unethical to say I like them. Just as the Trojan example showed. You are inferring something that isn't implied.

      I'll give you another example. I can say I like "Lunelle" based on reading about it. There is not a chance that I'll ever be a user. Not going to happen. So, are you saying, if I suggest it as a product to someone else, I'm being unethical because I will never use it myself? If I go to a blog where someone is asking about those kinds of products, and I say "I think Lunelle looks like a good product", am I astroturfing simply because I am not a user myself, and have I implied that I actually use it? Of course not.

    15. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was asked by my company not too long ago to write to legislators in a certain state and to get my friends and family to do the same in order to pass a certain bill that would fund or allow deployment of our product in the state. I liked the product and I did want the bill to pass and if a voter from that state had asked my viewpoint I would have given it freely. But I just got the nasty feeling in my stomach that my company would ask this. It's like it crossed a certain line it wasn't supposed to.

    16. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I didn't see anything in the question that said they wanted him to lie. If he doesn't like the app (in the non-facebook sense) then maybe it is time to search for somewhere else to work. If he does like it(in the non-facebook sense) then its not really lying to like the facebook page.

      The real question should be aren't most of the employees using the app or proud enough of the app to let their friends know they like what it is they are developing?

    17. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They are being asked to "like" the product on a social website. This implies nothing about being a user."

      Sites, not site. And I disagree. Liking does imply endorsement.

      endorsement does not imply anything about being a user. Nor is it necessarily deceitful or misleading to endorse something you haven't used.

      An example would be an employee that works for a company that sells an app(or other product) to a niche industry. Lets say the healthcare industry. Working as a developer, manager, sales person in at said company you wouldn't have need to use your new ultra low radiation x-ray equipment. But that doesn't mean you can't be proud of the product and willing to endorse it.

      Regardless of your role at the company, if you can't stand behind their products enough to give it the weakest endorsement of all(a facebook like) then you probably should be looking for new work.

    18. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sites, not site. And I disagree. Liking does imply endorsement.

      Agreed. While it may have less impact than writing false reviews or blog posts, fake 'likes', '+1s' etc are still astroturfing.

      When facebook added the "Like" button, they surely intended it to be used by people for things they actually like (otherwise the marketing data they collect from it is entirely spurious). Now a lot of people will "Like" things just to get discounts and enter contests, but that doesn't prevent some people from interpreting the number of "Likes" as true endorsements of the product.

    19. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "He's not being asked to astroturf. He's being asked to like the product. Astroturfing is when you post comments to blogs and in other places saying how great the product is"

      From the summary: "we are being asked to say that we like it"

      He's not asked to like it, he's asked to say that he likes it, which is not very different from saying that it's great. Both have a chance to coerce a potential customer to buy the product, which is the point of saying either. It's advertising disguised as a random comment from Joe Public, so it's astroturf.

    20. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like your company's product, you should quit.

      That's ridiculous. You'd quit every company you work for just because they have one product you don't like? Even if you're working in a different branch?

      I think a lot of our products are awful. I'm actively working to make them a little bit better, when I can.

    21. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't like your company's product, you should quit.

      The company I work for makes (among other things) a control system for a breast-milk pump.
      I'm a dude.
      I'm single.
      I have no kids.

    22. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liking implies endorsement, not necessarily usage or satisfaction with the product itself.

      He may, in good conscience, fully endorse the product that pays his paycheck without actually preferring the product over its competitors. His endorsement is for the product as a proxy of his livelihood, not on its own merits.

    23. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "Doing something ethical more than once doesn't, by definition, make it unethical."

      Obviously. But since they would be doing different things on the different sites, this argument has no relevance.

      "... the person is being asked to go to their "social websites", not every social website on the planet... "

      Straw-man argument. Just as I stated: sites, not site. Nothing was mentioned about it being many sites, much less "every social website on the planet". If you are going to argue, you can at least confine yourself to things that were actually stated rather than making shit up.

      "How can my NOT being a "happy satisfied user" prove in any way that when I say I like Sugar Smacks that I'm saying I'm a "happy satisfied user"? I'm not. I am not a user, and it is NOT unethical to say I like them. Just as the Trojan example showed. You are inferring something that isn't implied."

      Absolute bullshit. Even more than the last one. First, YOU were the one who brought up the "happy satisfied user" issue, which is just another straw-man argument. Prior to that, nobody had mentioned anything about being any kind of regular or "happy" user. Because the point you are missing is this: by saying you like Sugar Smacks, you are acknowledging that you have used the product (not necessarily that you are a "user" on some kind of regular basis), and that you like it. If you did indeed use the product at some point, and did like it, then there is nothing dishonest or misleading about that statement, and I have not tried to say there was. On the contrary: * I * am the one who pointed out that your Sugar Smacks example was NOT unethical. So I am not the one who is apparently misunderstanding here.

      I inferred nothing; I simply read your plain English words. Your Sugar Smacks example was an example of something different, because you were referring to a product you had actually tried. So it's a straw-man argument, plain and simple.

      "I'll give you another example. I can say I like "Lunelle" based on reading about it."

      Here you go again. Sure, you could say that, but the point all along has been: would it be ethical to do so? See, in order for it to be a valid example, you can basically only say that you like it or remain silent (ala "like" button). You don't have the opportunity to say, "I like the concept but never used it myself," (which is obviously not the kind of endorsement the company was looking for anyway). If you "like" it, people will assume that you have used it, since they have no way of knowing otherwise. So this is another shitty example. I would say that yes, if you "liked" Lunelle (in the sense of "liking" it on Facebook), without ever having used it yourself, that would be unethical because you would be giving people a false impression.

      "If I go to a blog where someone is asking about those kinds of products, and I say "I think Lunelle looks like a good product"..."

      Which is what I was leading up to in the last paragraph. This is just yet another example of straw-man argument. That is pretty obviously not the kind of endorsement the company was looking for, so it has no relevance to the issue we were discussing.

    24. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      You put it well and more succinctly than I managed. :o)

    25. Re:Astroturfing in social media by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Correction: I had forgotten that I had indeed stated that they were representing themselves as "happily satisfied users". But that is not as big as mistake as it might seem: it would in fact apply to your Sugar Smacks example because you WERE a user at some point, and you were happily satisfied (you claim to like them).

      But at no point did I make any claims about being a regular or current user of a product. That is an (incorrect) inferral that YOU made.

    26. Re:Astroturfing in social media by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      "hey, the solution to your problem is Spiffy Car and Cat wax, it will solve two problems at the same time..."

      I would dearly like to purchase some of your wondrous sounding product. Please direct me to your company website.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    27. Re:Astroturfing in social media by sosume · · Score: 1

      But I bet you like breasts!

    28. Re:Astroturfing in social media by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      For something to be astroturfing, it needs to "disguise the efforts of a political or commercial entity as an independent public reaction." Someone liking something under his personal account without attempting to hide his identity or portray himself as someone or something else (which would be the case here) does not seem to fit that definition.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
  8. It's not the company's account by scorp1us · · Score: 2

    And therefore you can set whatever terms you want. They are in effect asking you to store company materials at your house. You cannot be required to provide the company storage. And if you do, you are able to be compensated. Your online property is no different.

    If they want marketing, let them hire a marketing company.

    Note that the site's terms of use may prohibit some or all actions as well.

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
  9. Not A Good Sign by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I worked at a company where we were actively told to astroturf. It was a bad sign because the product sucked and instead doing something about the criticism, they buried their head in the sand. The criticism was completely well founded. My advice is to not worry about astroturfing and start looking for a new job. Your management isn't looking to fix problems, just cover over them.

  10. Most people haven't used it? by malraid · · Score: 1

    Well, people should be a bit more committed, and see the app, since it seems to be a big deal. This is probably also the fault of management for not engaging the employees more. Other than that, there's nothing wrong for putting out a good word for your employer. I'm sure every company does something similar, even if just by giving out shirts with the company logo. There's a fine line, and I'm sure plenty of companies cross over to the "wrong" side, but at least for me, it's not terrible, and to be expected actually.

    --
    please excuse my apathy
  11. It's a Thumb Trap by NeroTransmitter · · Score: 1

    The idea is that you appear anonymous, but that appearance of annonimity is actually what keeps anyone from knowing if anyone in the company is contributing. Your safety is guaranteed thanks to the thumb trap.

    --
    ^ Probably Sarcasm...
  12. Did they specifically ask you to lie? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sounds like you're probably misinterpreting what they said. Try the app and if you like it, post about it, and disclose your relationship as "working for the company, but not developing the product". No harm no foul. They have no way to track this.

    1. Re:Did they specifically ask you to lie? by NotSanguine · · Score: 2

      It sounds like you're probably misinterpreting what they said. Try the app and if you like it, post about it, and disclose your relationship as "working for the company, but not developing the product". No harm no foul. They have no way to track this.

      What the coward said! If you actually use the app (if you work for these guys, why aren't you eating your own dog food?), you can make some sort of judgement about its quality. If it's a piece of garbage, you need to let the devs and managers know about it so they can make it better.

      Since you work for these people, once you try the app you should (You'd hope) be able to say at least a couple of nice things about it ("It doesn't wipe my phone" or "Didn't exacerbate my diarrhea" etc, etc, etc). Then you're not astro-turfing are you?

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
  13. The Joy of Evil by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Go with the flow until you get a new job. Be able to pay your bills, but plan your exit strategy now. Take lower pay to switch if you can get by for a while on a lower salary (mortgages etc.).

    Get copies of the emails asking for the dirty deeds and hide them at home in case.

    I've worked for slimeballs also before, so I feel for you.

    Good luck.

    1. Re:The Joy of Evil by dnahelicase · · Score: 1

      Go with the flow until you get a new job. Be able to pay your bills, but plan your exit strategy now. Take lower pay to switch if you can get by for a while on a lower salary (mortgages etc.).

      Get copies of the emails asking for the dirty deeds and hide them at home in case.

      I've worked for slimeballs also before, so I feel for you.

      Good luck.

      You serious?

      You would quit a job because marketing asked you to do something slightly less than ethical? And maybe not even that?

      If they threatened you with something if you didn't "like" it, then maybe. If you do like the app in real life, then it's reasonable to ask people to "like" it. If you don't like it, and there's something you can do to make the app better - then maybe do that?

      I don't know what company you are going to find where marketing isn't going to ask you to promote your product. It's pretty much their job to see that it happens.

      They might not always be 100% ethical, but that's why they are marketing people. If you don't believe me, read up on them in pretty much any Dilbert strip

      I would probably just ignore them like I ignore pretty much all other marketing people that work for other companies. Most of the time they have very short attention spans.

    2. Re:The Joy of Evil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see this advice all the time and it is starting to stink of cliche. The job market sucks and if the alternative is just "the evil you don't know" why bother? The "find another job" remedy only works if your current employer is exceptionally bad. If they are typically bad, then the advice is not only painful, but fails to solve the problem. With 10% unemployment (http://www.shadowstats.com/alternate_data/unemployment-charts) then it's a zero-sum game where the 46% of people who work for shitty companies are supposed to find employment where the other 44% of people giving the cliche advice are already taking all the jobs.

      Why not just say: "Sucks to be you! I've got mine." And spare them the self loathing of wondering why they are in the bottom 46% who have to deal with shitty employers.*

      *Note: My numbers are likely highly optimistic as roughly >50% of my previous employers have been shitty. Thank god I clawed my way in to the 44% right?

  14. welcome to the modern age by forgottenusername · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A few startups ago, the marketing teams entire plan was "lean on your personal social networks". They'd have been better off standing outside handing out flyers.

    If you like the app and think it's useful then it doesn't hurt to promote it a little. If it's just some crap, then don't bother - you'll just desensitize your friends and contacts.

    Just saying "I'm working on app X, it's going pretty well!" is subtle and non-annoying, curious people will check it out.

    Anyway, a company asking employees to lean heavily on friends/family for promotion is a sure-fire sign of a failed marketing vision in my book, a problem in the business side of the house.

    1. Re:welcome to the modern age by Kjella · · Score: 2

      I sorta can see personal networks function if you're trying to start up a local business, that there's a new restaurant/clothes shop/computer repair shop in town, tell all your friends and family and everyone you know. Apps? Hello, most of them are $1-3 each and you need to be making sales far outside the town your little office is in. And unless it's a competitive game and we're looking for buddies to play, nobody bothers to talk about $1 apps. Besides, most people will know where you work and people take reviews for your own products with a big grain of salt - maybe you got caught up in the rah rahs and drank the koolaid at the office but the rest of the world doesn't agree.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:welcome to the modern age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'd have been better off standing outside handing out flyers.

      Why didn't you hand out flyers?

      Pick a nice sunny day when you'd rather be outside, print up some flyers and tell your boss you are heading out to promote the product, just as he asked.

    3. Re:welcome to the modern age by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed - The place I used to work at bought some expensive Bose noise-cancelling headphones for the staff so you could plug in and concentrate. You got to use your headphones 24x7 if you wanted. Of course, when I left, I had to hand them back.

      So... my point is ... do you want to know who my ex-employer was?

  15. Short answer: by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    No. Shilling is worse than trolling in my mind. If you must hype your product, at least be honest enough to let people know you're an employee.

    1. Re:Short answer: by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Shilling is to be expected though. I only read critical reviews if I need information-- after seeing that info, you can decide on what may be wrong with the product. Then, you have to check the neutral and positive reviews to see if it just sour grapes (or stupidity, or inherent negativity). All this for a $0.99 app does make me hate the astroturfers, but once you accept it as a necessary evil it isn't that hard to work around.

    2. Re:Short answer: by Ken_g6 · · Score: 2

      If you must hype your product, at least be honest enough to let people know you're an employee.

      This isn't just a good idea. It's the law!

      The revised Guides specify that while decisions will be reached on a case-by-case basis, the post of a blogger who receives cash or in-kind payment to review a product is considered an endorsement. Thus, bloggers who make an endorsement must disclose the material connections they share with the seller of the product or service.

      --
      (T>t && O(n)--) == sqrt(666)
    3. Re:Short answer: by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      once you accept it as a necessary evil it isn't that hard to work around.

      But I refuse to accept it. It's evil, unnecessary, and I don't under any circumstances accept it. In fact, in my case, astroturfing your cause or product is likely to make me hate your product. If you have to use deception to sell your wares, how good can they be?

  16. So this boils down to... by ultranaut · · Score: 1

    ...should I do what Group A tells me to do or what Group B tells me to do.

    1. Re:So this boils down to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      I recommend Group B. I've been using Group B for years, and they've never let me down. Anytime I had a problem, I just called the toll free number (and got a human!), and they took care of my problem within a couple of minutes.

      Highly recommended. Group B FTW.

    2. Re:So this boils down to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I beg to differ. I used Group B for six months, in that time I have had numerous problems. No one ever even appologized, and the "human" hung up on me when I asked if I could get a refund for a defective product.

      I switched to Group A and never looked back, best decision I have ever made.

    3. Re:So this boils down to... by matrim99 · · Score: 1

      That's because you're IN group B, you not-so anonymous shill....

      --
      Right. No, your other right. No, the other other right.
  17. Meh.. just tell your friends and move on with it. by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1, Troll

    Celebs do it all the time on public TV. (promote products they probably don't use let alone like).

    Tell your friends you're astroturfing outside of the social networking sites and move on with your life.

    --
    I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  18. Bad Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    When marketing asks the employees to 'like' something to push up it's numbers you know they're doing a bad job of things... or it's a lousy app. If you get fired for not 'liking' an app you know this isn't a company that values it's employees, it's just a people factory.

  19. Tracking all employees? by FadedTimes · · Score: 2

    Do they have a catalog of all the employees social media links? How would they know who did advertise and who didn't?

    1. Re:Tracking all employees? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      See, their core product is an app that does just that.

    2. Re:Tracking all employees? by SeaFox · · Score: 2

      Maybe this is yet-another-example-of-why-not-to-use-facebook. I can't astroturf for my company on my personal social networking accounts when I don't have any.

  20. Honesty by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Try the app. See if it's really worth saying good things about. If so, I'd go ahead and praise it as deserved. If not, send a message to the sales/QA/service department as appropriate saying why you can't promote the app. Keep a copy of that message just in case you have to show that you were fired for raising an ethical concern.

    Of course, encourage others to do the same, and mention your plan to superiors. They might just admire your behavior, and suggest it to more of the company. Few managers really want to be the guy to let a bad PR situation loose, so they might jump at the chance to prove they're more ethical than that nasty sales department - especially if the app is actually decent, and there's a good chance it'll get astroturfed anyway.

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    1. Re:Honesty by eljefe6a · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      You probably haven't ever dealt with a company like this. Honesty isn't the best policy and you will yourself either shunned or fired.

    2. Re:Honesty by fermion · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The dishonest thing about "astroturfing" is the lack of full disclosure. I see nothing wrong with an employee or developer or managet stating in a review who they think is good about a product. Heck, I would even welcome some inside information about details that make the product really good. However the consumer does have a right to know when a review has a deep interest in the success of a product. I know disclosure is not always permitted, so what I would say is to write nothing that is untrue.

      In any case I wonder if these programs really work. If a product is popular, the competition has an equal right to state honestly everything they think is bad about a product. In the end all we have is an arms race where the outcome is determined by advertising resources, not quality of product. And then we back where we started from.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:Honesty by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Informative

      Twice, actually. Once it was actually my project being shilled (I liked the project and thought it was useful - though I did end up getting fired from there, I'll still gladly tout its benefits in the appropriate context), and once I hadn't bothered trying the product. The latter one sucked, and I told the other team exactly why, and how I thought it could be improved. I got called into a meeting with other employees who'd complained, and the project lead took notes while we ran through the demo showing what we didn't like. The project went back for another round of revisions, and eventually came out much better for it. I never talked about the project publicly, and didn't get fired, either.

      Dishonest ass-kissing will get you promoted, because you make bosses like you personally. Honest critiquing with respect for politics will get you respect, because you show that you're dedicated to the company goals.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    4. Re:Honesty by pudding7 · · Score: 1

      I would not share my plans with coworkers or supervisors. Keep your mouth shut about it. I'd be surprised if anyone else in the company cares about this half as much as you do.

    5. Re:Honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod up.

    6. Re:Honesty by eljefe6a · · Score: 2

      Yours went much better than mine. I found myself on the losing end of political battle.

    7. Re:Honesty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And more importantly, honesty will keep your self respect intact. However comforting conformity and compliance can be, they cannot make up for submerging ones own will and soul to other. It might not be something of which one is consciously aware, but such deceit is only an attempt to place ones ego outside of himself, to depend on others approval for his own measure of self worth. That is immensely self destructive. It may be subtle, but it will drain your soul dry, depending on to what degree you act in such a way.

    8. Re:Honesty by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Try the app. See if it's really worth saying good things about. If so, I'd go ahead and praise it as deserved. If not, send a message to the sales/QA/service department as appropriate saying why you can't promote the app.

      This.

      Good thing I checked the comment history before posting, because this, pretty much word-for-word, was what popped into my head as soon as I RTFS. If it is an application from another department, well, there's no harm in trying it and seeing if you like it. If you do, again, no harm in letting people know (although I'd also put in a clear disclaimer about working for the company on any posts). Similarly, if you don't like the app, let the developers/marketing team know, and give them useful feedback re: why it's not ringing your bell. (i.e., not 'it's dumb!')

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    9. Re:Honesty by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I know disclosure is not always permitted

      A company not permitting disclosure? They either don't have a lawyer, or their lawyer is outright insane. All places I've worked in required disclosure whenever there was any potential connection, presumably to dodge any potential lawsuits; some have even had specific verbiage that you had to use, and guidelines on where to put it.

    10. Re:Honesty by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

      I'm not so adament about the need for disclosure, as long as the statement made is absolutely honest. While it does explain how you came to know the product, it also undermines the honesty of the message. Rather than being a person of integrity, whose endorsement is a heartfelt approval, you appear to be a sold-out shill who'll say whatever his boss tells him to.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    11. Re:Honesty by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      But not disclosing your relationship with the company that makes the product is deception and might even be against the law. Even if you genuinely love the product.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    12. Re:Honesty by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      Actually, I respect posts where the poster declares any company connections, as long as the rest of their post isn't just 'omgz, you shold tots get this, it's *SO* amzng! ^_^'.

      If their follow up comments are clear, factual and verifiable, I view them as a reliable source of information, perhaps even more reliable than someone unconnected with the company. Sure they have an interest in promoting their product, but because of that desire, I think they are more motivated to provide complete and honest reviews, or other commenters will simply refute their statements and show up the lies. They can also be a great source for sneak peeks at upcoming features, and who doesn't like to peek under the curtain once in a while :)

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
    13. Re:Honesty by CCarrot · · Score: 1

      But not disclosing your relationship with the company that makes the product is deception and might even be against the law. Even if you genuinely love the product.

      I'm pretty sure it's not against the law unless money's involved somewhere (as in, awarding tenders and other contracts) or testifying in court. But even so, declaring your connection avoids even the appearance of a conflict of interest, and IMHO is the correct thing to do from an ethical standpoint when posting in a semi- or fully-public forum. Declaring that you work for the company need not hurt your endorsement, as long as you stick to truthful analysis of why you enjoy the product so much. If other people like the same things you do, then they may like this product as well.

      --
      "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant
  21. One way by tool462 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You could always try the app yourself then give it an honest review. If you genuinely like it, it's not astroturfing.
    If you don't like it, you could consider feeding that back to the developers as that may reveal more fundamentally why it's not selling well.

    1. Re:One way by gatfirls · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dead on. Seriously, your employer is just asking you to help with marketing. Raising awareness is not some evil agenda. Do you think Trixx are really only for kids?

    2. Re:One way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. The opposite. I think that feeding Trix to kids is a form of child abuse.

    3. Re:One way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you genuinely like it, it's not astroturfing.

      FTFY: If you clearly reveal your financial interest in the review, it's not astroturfing.

      Liking a product is not a sufficient condition for it not being astroturf.

    4. Re:One way by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      Trixx are for rabbits, silly.

    5. Re:One way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My job is not to be a media whore.

      I wouldn't astroturf even if I was paid to do so and would avoid anyone who would astroturf.

      My personal account is just that personal, I don't let anyone associated with the company access to it in any form. If they don't like it they can get fucked.

  22. You're being asked to "like" it? by nine-times · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So are we just talking about clicking the "Like" button on Facebook? That doesn't sound terrifically evil. It's not unusual for people to "like" something they don't like, and so I wouldn't even really consider it dishonest. Like I "like" one of my friend's websites, but... you know, it's just because it's my friend's site. My work has asked me to make use my LinkedIn Profile shows that I work where I do, in case the company gets looked up.

    Also, are they simply asking you to do it, or are they somehow monitoring everyone's accounts to make sure they do it, and then threatening some kind of response if you don't "like" their product? If they're just asking, and you don't want to do it, then don't do it.

    This doesn't seem like a serious problem.

    1. Re:You're being asked to "like" it? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      This doesn't seem like a serious problem.

      Unless they are asking him to join Facebook...

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:You're being asked to "like" it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said you really liked my site! *sad face*

  23. Try it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you like it, tell your friends. If you don't, tell your coworkers why their app sucks.

  24. Don't lie by mbone · · Score: 2

    My advice is, don't lie. Try out the app and, if you like it, promote it, but don't lie about it.

  25. Shouldn't the Employees be familiar with the Ap? by mykepredko · · Score: 2

    If the company's employees aren't familiar with the Ap (which seems strange as it is something they are all getting at least some of their salary on) shouldn't this be indication one for the marketeers that it isn't very good? Maybe it's for an obscure market or target customer, but I would still think that people had opinions on it if it was useful in any way.

    When I think back to the various companies at which I have worked, *everybody* had an opinion of the company's products and generally used them.

    If the majority of employees have no experience with it, I would think the most positive action the company could take would be to fire the Ap's product manager because if the Ap can't generate any interest in the company, then clearly it's NFG.

    myke

  26. You should use the product by tjmcgee · · Score: 2

    Why do you work for a company who's products you don't use? Is the app too expensive, or just not something that is suited to your life? Frankly if neither you nor your colleagues use a product your company created, why does the company think anyone will use it? If the product is good, but you just don't have a use for it, I don't see any ethical issues in promoting it. But if it's simply not a good product then I would probably not promote it, after all it's your personal reputation that is at stake. I'd also start looking for another job.

    1. Re:You should use the product by vlm · · Score: 2

      Why do you work for a company who's products you don't use? Is the app too expensive, or just not something that is suited to your life? Frankly if neither you nor your colleagues use a product your company created, why does the company think anyone will use it?

      Many jobs ago over the summer I worked IT for a place that provided emergency 24x7 repair service for industrial cranes (like those things you see moving shipping containers at seaports and building skyscrapers, nothing under, say, 10 tons capacity) Obviously I had no use for their service, but I could easily intelligently evaluate what it would be like to be their customer, and compare them to similar emergency service providers and I knew a little bit about the competition and their strengths and weaknesses.

      So the original posters argument is he admits in writing to knowing nothing about the product, and possibly knows nothing about the entire business sector they operate in, yet he's apparently got an opinion about how they run things anyway... gotta be working in government or finance, definitely at management level, that's what I'm thinking.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:You should use the product by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      I used to work for a big company. I used some of the products, but honestly I didn't even know all the products they sold... let alone used them all. And some of the products were in areas I had no desire to work in.
      More recently, I work for a small company, and we just released an iPad app. But I don't think ANYONE in the company (other than the VP) uses the product... Because outside of the office iPads, no one owns one.
      Just because few people use the product, doesn't mean it sucks.

  27. Which approach? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 0

    How would you deal with this?

    This really depends on your approach. You could go the Apple route and say you love your product. The problem is people can spot this really easily and they may out you as a shill. You might instead try the Google approach and say you hate the lead competitor's product. Your followers won't realize they're shilling for you because they'll feel righteous. The best part is the ensuing flame war will fuel itself!

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  28. The crux is enforcement. by metrometro · · Score: 1

    If they were truely black hat, they'd be creating spoof accounts and autoposting from a quiet room where no one can see it. Asking people to, you know, use your product and, maybe, talk about it isn't even that shady.

    Asking, sure. Enforcing, that's something else. But I suspect they won't do much. The employer doesn't have all that much leverage there, because it's all happening out in the public. Not hard to blow the whistle on this, and the various marketplaces can nuke a product without recourse, which is something that should keep marketing people awake at night.

  29. This is how the world works by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get used to it. Everybody does it and much of what you think of as news (especially tech news) is networked people astro turfing for each other.

    If you think some of your friends will find it interesting, why not? Just serve your friends well. Use the app and be honest about what you like about it. If you can't stand it, just mention the app without saying you like it.
    It is somewhat self serving and it may feel dirty but you are helping your company and yourself and informing your friends who may be interested and so everyone benefits. This is how the world works.

    1. Re:This is how the world works by jthill · · Score: 1

      Get used to it. Everybody does it

      Though you may not know it, what you really mean is "everybody who willingly associates with you".

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    2. Re:This is how the world works by citylivin · · Score: 1

      Every major and minor corporation does this. Non profits, schools, everyone. There is even a term for it, eating your own dogfood. Using a product or service that your company provides - as opposed to the competitors.

      Your making it seem like jitjill is some sort of amoral conformist. Granted, they are (the conformist part anyways). However he points out and rightfully so, that this happens everywhere. You are expected not to say bad things about your employer and their products. If you really feel strongly and negatively about the products or services your company makes, the correct response in public is "no comment". As long as they are not breaking any laws, or abusing the employees. Asking the employees to vote for their companies product is hardly that.

      We are talking about apps for a smartphone "toy" here. Hes doesnt work for a defence contractor, being asked to promote the sale of bombs and missiles.
      I think its pretty safe to either props it, or ignore it. The grandparent was right. Its just not a big deal.

      --
      As a potential lottery winner, I totally support tax cuts for the wealthy
    3. Re:This is how the world works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is becoming a real problem IMO. News stories (whether on TV, print or internet) are often advertisements. Online reviews are not believable. I get annoyed every time I see an actual Angie's List commercial which says their reviews are done by real people. Oh, yeah? How do I know that?

      If I really want a product review I cast a very wide net and take all of them with a cup or two of salt (not just a grain).

      I'm much more likely to trust the opinion of someone I know personally and interact with offline but even then they are sometimes wrong or just have a different idea of what is "good" for their purposes which don't coincide with mine.

  30. Maybe actually TRY the app? by wintermute740 · · Score: 2

    How about you actually TRY the app? If it's good, go ahead an give it a favorable review, but include full disclosure that you're an employee. That way there is no question of whether you're astroturfing or not.

    1. Re:Maybe actually TRY the app? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Sometimes it's hard to eat the dogfood. It may not be applicable to the employee. Say the app is one that monitors helps monitor your menstrual cycle but you're male, or a home buying assistant and you're not buying a home, or it's a social app and you're a computer nerd, etc.

  31. Eat your own dog food by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most of the employees have not used the app

    Why not? What kind of app is it? How can you expect others to use it if you can't/don't/won't use it yourselves? Eat your own dog food.

  32. Out her. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How about this? Rate it one star, with the comment:

    "My HR/Marketing Rep, [insert HR/Marketing Rep's name] told me to rate this application." See if public embarrassment is enough to dial back the pressure to astroturf.

    I would, of course, make sure that you can anonymously rate the application.

  33. Try the thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give the app an honest try. If you have good things to say about it, then you can honestly say good things about it ("another division at my company made [application], I found it quite useful for [honest evaluation of hype]"). If it's useless or irrelevant to your life, tell marketting that you cannot find anything good to say about the software, but that if they [improve it/make something you'd find useful] you would inform your friends.

    If marketting does not like your answer, tell HR that another division is harrassing you, and if they do not cease, you will take appropriate measures.

    Also, keep every e-mail about this in case you do get in trouble for taking an honest stand.

  34. Warning Signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. "Most of the employees have not used the app." This is a sign that the app probably isn't very good, so you probably shouldn't evangelize it.

    2. " Will the marketing or HR people look at who has astroturfed, and who has not at raise time?" Do the marketing and HR people determine the pay raises of the engineering staff at your company? If so, run, because you have bigger problems.

  35. It's only wrong if you lie. by Jeng · · Score: 1

    If you do a review of the product, do a review of the product.

    If it sucks, call it out, if it's great then point out it's qualities.

    If the product sucks your job is on the line anyway, the only way that your job will still be there is if the product is actually good so you might as well tell the truth, and if the truth sucks get going on that resume.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  36. Tl;dr: You're working for unethical slimeballs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing I've never understood is when a company asks its employees to act unethically -- much less does it in a very open way like this -- why would you think the company won't act unethically towards its non-management employees?
     
    For example: When the Zynga brouhaha about them considering ditching old employee's stock options came up, it was only the specifics of it that were news; of course Zynga, who are obviously scumbags, would think about doing something along those lines. The people who worked for Zynga didn't do it out of desperation, they chose to work for a company like Zynga because they thought they'd get rich and didn't care about things like having the offical policy to rip off other games or distribute spyware to users. Then the scum they work for considers turning their sights on them and they're surprised?
     
    If you aren't desperate for money, start shopping for a new job. If you are pretty desperate for this job, then yes, you're going to have to astroturf because they likely will check up on you.

  37. Inability to Understand Social Media? by dryriver · · Score: 2

    It seems that companies think of social media in two ways only: 1) Can we use this to our advantage? 2) Can this be used against us? They don't seem to understand that YOUR social media account actually REPRESENTS YOU on the internet, as in your ONLINE IDENTITY. So what they are asking you to do is analogous to making you stand on the sidewalk in front of a supermarket with a bullhorn, in a yellow chicken-suit, and then making you shout "Fred Freddson's Eggs are the BEST EGGS in the market. Buy today! You'll LOOOOVE these eggs!" at anyone who passes by? Would you do this in real life if your employer asked you to? Its up to you to decide whether "Astroturfing" on social media is as bad as that. How much do you like your job? If you depend on it financially, then yes, by all means, do some Astroturfing. If the job sucks on the other hand, and you think you can find a better one, by all means, tell your employer "You know, I shouldn't be FORCED to use my social media accounts for the good of the company... There are better ways of marketing a product." Good luck with your job...

    --
    Why did the chicken cross the road? Because Elon Musk put an AI chip in its head.
  38. Kim Kardashian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She was on Fox and Friends this morning. She goes on about how great the Nokia 900 that she has is. You know for a fact that she is getting paid to talk about that device. Expecially since she said she had it for a while and the phone just came out. It had pictures of her baby as the wall paper on it and so on. Note all though she never said she was being paid to talk about it she was "slipping" it in the conversation. Makes me sick I can't get paid to say things.

    1. Re:Kim Kardashian by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1

      Makes me sick I can't get paid to say things.

      You're not getting paid, because your ass isn't big enough.

    2. Re:Kim Kardashian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She's a dude!

    3. Re:Kim Kardashian by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

      It had pictures of her baby as the wall paper on it and so on.

      She doesn't have a baby, that's probably her sister's son Mason. Although her sister is expecting baby #2.

      Wait, this isn't CeleBuzz?

    4. Re:Kim Kardashian by irving47 · · Score: 1

      to be fair, she probably has had it "for a while" as a demo unit for this exact purpose.

      --
      I had a sucky sig.
  39. Get back to work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So first you refuse to thumbs-up our app on facebook, and now you are killing time on Slashdot complaining about how we just asked for a little teamwork on the new release? Come on, jerk, either you like it or you don't. And get back to work.

    Sincerely,

    Your boss (posting AC for obvious reasons)

  40. Just be completely honest by egamma · · Score: 1

    ...and have your handle be "LoyalEmployeeofCompany", where company is the company you're shilling for.

  41. Why is this a question? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do the same thing you do to an acquaintance who is like "Dude, tell your friends about my band bro". Smile, nod, ignore.

  42. You need money, so play both sides. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    You work for evil cocksuckers, but need money. Astroturf on expendable accounts, while systematically and __untraceably__ documenting all the astroturfing you can find.

    Leak the info at your convenience. You get paid, they get fucked, life is good. There is no moral obligation to companies which astroturf.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  43. I would not take this lightly by spirit_fingers · · Score: 1

    I'd hire a lawyer and have them fire off a terse letter reminding them that my political views are my private business and they can go fuck themselves. Oh, and by the way, my refusal to participate in their bogus political scheme had better not affect my prospects for a raise or advancement or there will be hell to pay. Have a nice day.

    1. Re:I would not take this lightly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd hire a lawyer and have them fire off a terse letter

      Marvellous! There goes $500 and another lawyer can eat for another day.

  44. Two things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would assume if they are selling it, the company will be more profitable. This is in your interest. Therefor, I say astroturf away.. However, try it first, cause if you promote it and its crap, it could damage the company.

  45. Your job will probably disappear. by Viewsonic · · Score: 1

    Obviously selling the product is a concern for your employer. This means it is a concern for you. If your employer cannot make money, how do you expect them to pay you? I'm not telling you to lie, or make anything up, but why aren't you being proactive about this and asking for the app to use for your own? Unless you hate your company, then expect to be let go for some other reason.

  46. Just be honest. by MrLizard · · Score: 1

    Well, I'd say, do this:
    Is the app actually any good? Does it do what it's supposed to? Does it have a target audience that would like it, but might not be aware of it?
    If so, promote it honestly. Tell the truth:"I work for this company, and I'm proud of the product we make. If you want an app that does blah, you should try this one out. It's nifty, and I stand behind the work my company and my co-workers have done on it."

    If not... just look for a new job. If you think your company is making crap, you're probably right, and it's better to get out before they kick you out.

  47. This isn't astroturfing. by bistromath007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    That would be if you were expected to fake a bunch of actual reviews. Of course you "like" it. It buys you food. Employees have always been expected to stand behind their company's work in at least a "well, it's ours" kind of way.

    1. Re:This isn't astroturfing. by timeOday · · Score: 2

      From the company's perspective it is astroturfing, but from the individual's perspective it is more accurately deemed shilling. Either way, reviewing something without disclosing your financial stake in it is dishonest - it is the very definition of conflict of interest.

    2. Re:This isn't astroturfing. by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      It's neither of those, because it's not a review. It is pressing a button that says "for reasons I don't care to elaborate on, I think you should try this." Hardly a lie in that situation.

    3. Re:This isn't astroturfing. by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      The OP said he was told to tell friends, or click a "like" button. I think telling friends "My company released foo, check it out" is sufficient to cover all grounds.

    4. Re:This isn't astroturfing. by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Exactly. I'd advise the anonymous OP never to go into sales or advertising, as he seems to have a big moral dilemma about helping his company make money. "Likes" on products are advertising. Does anyone ever take them seriously? No-one is looking at them expecting the truth. No one is going to be amazed that you "like" your company's product.

      But anyway, you don't have to have used the product to like it. My company builds lifeboats, I've never used one, I hope I never shall. I like them lots and lots. We make good ones and they pay my wages.

      The anonymous OP is not the first person ever to be asked by their employer to put in a bit of a plug for the company. They will not be the last. If they have a serious problem with that then perhaps they are working for the wrong company, and should be questioning more than just this request. If they have a problem with it crossing over to their personal life, then ignore it. Who is ever going to know or check or care??? Seriously?

      What a fuss about nothing.

  48. Basic Office Skills by royallthefourth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When marketing (or most anyone else) sends an email to the entire company, ignore it. Duh.

    1. Re:Basic Office Skills by trojjan · · Score: 1

      Seconded.
      The only time I didn't(couldn't) follow that was when I was working in Dell and got an email from the VP. The guy's name was Dick Hunter.

  49. You already know the answer. by s4m7 · · Score: 1

    If you have moral difficulties with something outside the scope of your employment agreement and/or job responsibilities, then don't do it.

    Normally someone doesn't have to ask me to astroturf a project I'm working on. I want my company to be a viable source of employment so their bottom line is my bottom line. The more money I make them, the more money there is around raise time, whether they're keeping a naughty or nice list or not. Keeping that in mind, I'm usually very eager to promote things I'm working on. Even if I haven't tried it, I probably know what advantages it offers over competing products.

    I'm perplexed at how developers can make something and not use it. Or marketers can sell something they don't use. Or administrators can manage people working on something they don't use. It strikes me that this is what Marx was talking about with regard to alienation. And it smells like a management failure, either to hire people who care enough about the work they do, or to instill enough of a sense of shared involvement, to casually mention it to some friends.

    "Hey guys I'm working on this thing, check it out and let me know what you think!" is subtle, effective and not pushy. If you don't feel right doing that? look for another job.

    --
    This comment is fully compliant with RFC 527.
    1. Re:You already know the answer. by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Telling people that you work on product X and asking people to check it out is not astroturfing, and also not what this slimy company asked him to do.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  50. Simple: by trum4n · · Score: 1

    Sell your story to news, sue when you get fired for telling the truth.

  51. Re:Carls Jr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Not using it isn't that odd.... by MrLizard · · Score: 1

    I see a lot of "If the employees don't use it, it must be crap!" comments here, which makes me wonder a little about what kinds of jobs people hold. Most of my professional career has been spent writing code for products I would never personally use -- vertical market software for large financial institutions, for example, or custom databases for people with very specific needs. To pick something at random, an app which helps people layout and plan gardens is not necessarily an app most of the programmers who work on it will be using themselves, unless you happened to have hired only programmers who are also gardeners. Replace "gardening" with "birdwatching", "tracking blood sugar levels", "scanning postage stamps for your online stamp collection", or a zillion other things which there might be a market for, but which might not be a passion for the people actually developing it. It's really not at all uncommon for the employees of a company to not also be the target market of that company, and not just in software.

    1. Re:Not using it isn't that odd.... by vlm · · Score: 1

      It's really not at all uncommon for the employees of a company to not also be the target market of that company, and not just in software.

      The only excuse I can think of for not knowing the business field and at least something about the competitors would be DoD TS clearance compartmentalized stuff. Like if you were writing ICBM navigation software but were so compartmentalized you don't even know what missile it was for.

      vertical market software for large financial institutions

      20 years ago I worked in that field and marketing went to great extremes to educate us as to how our competitors products sucked (we had much better graphs and our network was much more stable).

      might not be a passion for the people actually developing it

      Nothing kills a hobby faster than doing it at work, but even someone who knows nothing about the subject can at least technically evaluate the app.. do all the features advertised show up in there, somewhere? Does it look nice? Fast and low latency? Does it run at all or just crash? Are the user instructions written in English or India-glish? Is the user manual written and screencap'd for the same version as is distributed? Typos and missspellllings in the app?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Not using it isn't that odd.... by MrLizard · · Score: 1

      There's a difference between "Not knowing the competitor's products and why yours is (hopefully) better" and "Not using the product for your personal use". Likewise, testing for features and functionality, making sure it doesn't crash, making sure all promises are fulfilled -- all of those, to my mind, fall into "QA" and not "using the app". Perhaps I'm over-interpreting, but when I think of "using an app", I am thinking "I would use this app if I wasn't working for the company; if I saw it in the store, I would buy it." There's a lot of reasons for employees of a company to have no personal, out-of-work, interest in an application without the application being poorly designed, broken, etc.

      I learned an awful lot about employment agencies when I worked on a product designed for that business. I spent a lot of time talking to potential users, having them test the software, tell me what it did wrong, what features they needed, etc.

      However, I didn't run home and fire it up for my own use... because I don't run an employment agency. I couldn't view the product as a user of it.

      Further, depending on the size of the company and the division of labor, many employees may have little need to know about the functionality of the final product in order to do their job and do it well. To use a non-programming example, an artist hired to paint an image for a new "Magic" card does not need to know the card's mechanical function or even how to play the game; he needs to know the art style, similar images, and any important themes or iconic imagery to use. Etc. (On the flip side, someone who designs the card's mechanics had better be an active player of the game. There's a lot of grey areas and caveats here, something the Internet, in general, despises; all arguments must be in absolutes, and any exception voids the entire thing.)

      Now, of course, since the OP won't tell us the product or the company, I don't know if any of this applies. If the app *is* in a category most of them would use (or use competing apps for, already), and they STILL don't use it... then, yeah, there's a real problem with the app itself. I just don't like to make assumptions.

  53. Simple by geekoid · · Score: 1

    When asking slashdot, use the company name. Backlash will stop this nonsense.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  54. Just say you will by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    And don't do it. Not like anyone will check, if they do check then lie again and say you did your "like" must have been "lost in the system".

    http://www.amazon.com/Dilbert-Way-Weasel-Outwitting-Pants-Wearing/dp/006052149X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1334175670&sr=8-1

    read that book and learn from it, remember the mantra of modern line "integrity is for suckers"

  55. You have an attitude problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are going to need your Facebook password.

  56. I'd try the app by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

    If it's good, I'd say so. If it sucks, well, then I'd have some thinking to do. Of course, if a company is relying on ME to do their PR, it's probably near bankruptcy anyway. :-P

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  57. It depends. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I once worked at a company that fired their sales staff, then essentially asked us (the developers) to rake in clients for them, after working hours, for a 20% commission. Strangely enough, this brilliant management style didn't quite work out and the company went belly-up.

    Point being, counter-intuitively, if your company actually need you to astroturf for them, you probably shouldn't. Instead, run.

  58. So let me get this straight...You are not part of the marketing department but the marketing folks are asking you and the rest of the company to do their jobs for them??? That's what it sounds like to me.

  59. Yes | No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes | No. Choose one.

  60. I declined by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My employer does this. Every new iPhone release, we're asked to give glowing reviews. They say that our competition will post a bunch of negative reviews, so we have to post good reviews just to balance them out and make the reviews fair. They even sent out instructions on how to download and review the app even if you don't have an iPhone.

    While it may be true that this is a necessary business activity, frankly it's not my job. I even said that if it's necesary, why can't the marketers create a bunch of accounts and do their job themselves. Oh, no, that would be unethical. Better them than me, I uttered under my breath, and besides, being unethical is not in my job description, even if it is in theirs.

    What's next, the toilets need to be scrubbed and it's better to ask the engineers to voluteer their time than it is to pay a janitor?

    If I were paid an hourly wage, then yes I would probably do it, but I would give an honest review, not just an automatic: "OMG This is Terrific! Ignore all those naysayers, they don't know what they're talking about!" But volunteer my time so that the marketers, who are also salaried, can save some of theirs? No way Jose!

  61. AMWAY called... by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

    Jeez, this is just like a pyramid scheme, except you don't get a percentage of the sales.

  62. Expect little impact on your job by Yoik · · Score: 1

    Lots of companies make requests like this, or more benign looking stuff like asking that you donate to particular causes and telling someone so the company can effectively claim credit for your donation. The request is cheap and might give the company something it values.

    But if it values you as an employee, the companies' request will be polite and ignoring it, or refusing politely, will have little or no impact on your pay or retention. Making a big stink about it, tho, will hurt your future unless it was already controversial in the executive suite.

    It is all about fitting in with the culture, and few companies have a consistent one across engineering, marketing, and finance. If they did, Dilbert could never have succeeded.

  63. Smells like... by bloobamator · · Score: 1

    fraud.

    --
    "Crude and slow, clansman. Your attack was no better than that of a clumsy child."
  64. Re:Shouldn't the Employees be familiar with the Ap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry to see you are running short of P's here are some spares...

    Ppppppppp pppppp pppppp pppp p ppp ppppp ppp pppppp Pppp ppp pppp pppppppp ppppp pppppp pppp ppppp ppppp pppp ppppppppp ppppppppp

  65. Try out the app and do it by hawguy · · Score: 1

    Just try out the app and if you like it, then go on Facebook and "Like" it.

    If you don't like it, then start looking for a job, why would you want to keep working at a company that produces apps that even its own employees don't like?

  66. Try it? by mosb1000 · · Score: 1

    How about you try the app, then post a review if you like it?

  67. Look yourself in the mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Repeat: I am not a person, I am a corporate asset.

    Then do what must be done.

    Seriously though, you wouldn't be asking about this if you thought it was okay.

    Maybe ask those in charge to let you test drive the app, so you can give a more thorough review.

    Saying something is good when it's not, is likely worse. People will buy it, hate it, and accuse you of astro turfing.

  68. As a first step... by TwineLogic · · Score: 1

    Is it possible for the employees to use the app? Is the app an important part of the business development plan?

    I ask, OP, because the app is important enough to marketing that they asked, by email, for employees to astroturf. Yet you are observing that few employees have used the app. Why is there this disconnect in the perceived importance of the app?

  69. Lies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Obviously this is not an individual who is looking for a new job. Bluntly, it's not good out there. The folks who are hiring are cherry-picking hard, and hiring cheap. Get real.

  70. A few people are missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The app may not be part of the core business. Some people seem to imply that since he doesn't know or like the app then he must be ignorant about his company. However, he never said he worked for a software focused company. The app could just be some small side project meant to drum up business or serve some small function.

  71. It depends by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1

    Is this a product that you are proud to be a part of? If yes then just be honest when you post. If not then I would ignore the email.

  72. let's not.. by alienzed · · Score: 1

    ...and say we did.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  73. Are they paying me for it? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

    Other ethical concerns aside (and there are a few), I do social networking on my own time, not company time. If they wanted me to "like" or blog about something, away from work, they can damned well pay me for it. Otherwise (even without other ethical concerns) the answer would be "no". Not maybe: no.

    1. Re:Are they paying me for it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're anything but the lowest code monkey or a contractor (that's not quite redundant), then you're 'Exempt', and not eligible for overtime.

      Also, your employer almost certainly stated in their offer to you that you may have to occasionally work longer hours.

      So, suck it up.

      (Oh, and if you say, "Consultant, not contractor," you're also deceiving yourself.)

    2. Re:Are they paying me for it? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "If you're anything but the lowest code monkey or a contractor (that's not quite redundant), then you're 'Exempt', and not eligible for overtime."

      Who said anything about overtime? Besides, OP did not say he/she was a coder. Could be in sales, or a secretary, or anything at all.

      "Also, your employer almost certainly stated in their offer to you that you may have to occasionally work longer hours."

      Irrelevant. You are assuming I meant something that I did not mean at all. I didn't say I would mind doing the work, overtime or not. I simply stated that I wanted to be paid for it: if an employer wants to have any say over my actions when I am not at work, such as social networking, then they can make it "work", and pay me for it. Otherwise, the answer is no. It is that simple.

      "Oh, and if you say, "Consultant, not contractor," you're also deceiving yourself."

      Not at all. Consultants are generally contractors, but most contractors are not consultants. And I am not a consultant. Although I was, at one time.

  74. Two words: "passive aggressive" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just ignore it. If they are a real pain in the ass, time to create a fake work profile. :)

  75. Rephrase by Lando · · Score: 1

    My company is asking me to lie to customers. Okay, so it's all on your morals. Personally, I don't lie and I probably wouldn't work for a company that tells me to do so, but there are a lot of companies out there that do, so it's all on you since whistleblowing is just going to say so what.

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
  76. Re:Shouldn't the Employees be familiar with the Ap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't know what the company or the app does. I work on a product that I have absolutely no use for, I can't imagine that's a strange situation. Plus, we're not even that large a company and I'm sure many of the employees have no more than a vague idea of what my product does, if they've even seen it at all (It's not our only product).

    I could imagine some group in our company could create an "app", and I would not feel comfortable saying I "liked" it. If it was demonstrated I could maybe say whether it looked like it ran smoothly, but that's all.

  77. That's not astroturfing by cwgmpls · · Score: 1

    Astroturfing is intentionally spreading a lie. You may not have authority to speak directly about the product in question, but you have authority to speak about the quality of the company that makes it. You are an employee, so you have a legitimate connection and interest in your companies products. Even if you've never used a specific product, you have an interest is putting your company in a good public light. Would you hesitate to say something good about your company and its products to a friend at a coffee shop? Neither do you have reason to hesitate about saying good things about your company and its products in social media.

    Astroturing is intentionally spreading a lie. If you know that saying good things about your company and its products are not a lie, then this is not astroturfing. If saying good things about your company and its products is a lie, then start looking for a different job!

    1. Re:That's not Astroturfing by Skapare · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between saying "I was on the team that developed this and I know we used modern development methods, so I believe this is quality software" as opposed to "I used this software and it improved my life, earned me $1.25M, and got me a new gorgeous girlfriend."

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:That's not astroturfing by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Would you hesitate to say something good about your company and its products to a friend at a coffee shop?

      I bet he would now.

      Neither do you have reason to hesitate about saying good things about your company and its products in social media.

      He does now. He's clearly working for a bunch of dishonest, lying, scumbags who would rather make money through fraud/deception than actually offering something that sells itself because it's actually good. If it's actually good all he'd have to do is post a link and tell people that he works on a product that does X. People could decide for themselves whether it's any good or not.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  78. Multi Level Marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must be working for Amway.

  79. Are you in Sales? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Unless you are part of the Sales Department, tell them to stuff it.

    I don't buy the new Corporate paradigm shift for IT personnel to also become social media sales whores. YES it is occurring, and I will not be sucked into a sales-pitch job for Internet passerbys.

  80. Are you one of the marketing people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If not, stop doing their job for them. Or ask them to help you with the coding.

  81. why are you working there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you aren't willing to astroturf the company you put 8 hours of your life everyday towards why are you there? Sounds like you don't exactly feel like a part of the company and it's more of a "just a job". If that is the case don't astroturf and go back to your daily tasks. Also, when raise time comes around I'd be highly surprised if your manager gives a crap about this...he\she will looking at many many other aspects like independence to reliability.

  82. Didn't newegg and other online stores crack down by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Didn't newegg and other online stores crack down on stuff like this?

  83. A Better Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do they even know what your social media site monikers are to check?

  84. This is why I hate Facebook. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ask HR for a copy of the app so you can try it out. Just say it is so you are better able to extol its virtue(s) and they will oblige.

    More seriously, though, I believe you are within your rights to decline to "like" the app. The social media account is your personal account created on your own time, yes? The business can politely encourage employees who use the app AND like it to help spread the word, but they have absolutely no right to make a blanket request for employees to increase its favor in the public regardless of qualification or inclination to do so. If you are concerned about repercussions, document everything. Trail of proof is important.

  85. The root of the issue... by owlnation · · Score: 2

    Chances are, if you are proud of the company you work for, and are happy to be there, nobody in that company needs to ask you to astroturf, or do any kind of promotion.

    If you are here asking the question as to what you should do... then I think you already know that answer.

    And that answer is to get a better job, with someone you enjoy working for. Or at least, someone who won't make you want to shower every time you come home at night to wash the slime off. Yes, it's a tough economy -- but it got that way by the immoral actions of the minority. They way out of it, is not by further immoral actions.

    And at risk of Godwinning the thread, the "only obeying orders" is an excuse, never a defense. You are responsible for your own moral actions. Internally, for your own peace of mind -- and in the eyes of the law.

  86. Is it any good? by sjames · · Score: 2

    Give the app a try. Perhaps you'll actually like it and ease your dilemma.

  87. If they want astroturfing.... by drolli · · Score: 1

    they should turn to the SEO monkeys. Not that i approve of all business methods they use.....

    Honestly. If the toilet needs to be cleaned, will it be done by the employees taking turns? If the office needs to be painted, will everybody get an brush?

  88. They never learn do they? by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 2
    Ah marketting - I remember them (...asking for a manual *before* i designed the program haha).

    One approach - just point out that spamming social media with ilikes from a single source will very likely backfire and

    get the company *bad* publicity (...and hint that marketroids might lose *their* jobs) .

    Might even scare them a bit (wipes crocodile tear from eye....)

    Andy

    (Yes it is *personal* accounts, but a big batch in one go is a dead giveaway)

  89. Why do you work there? by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

    Why do you work for a company that makes a product you think sucks? It must suck, otherwise you wouldn't have a problem.

    1. Re:Why do you work there? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You can like a product but not want to publicly advertise for it. Maybe you haven't tried all of the competing products so don't feel comfortable calling the better solution. Maybe you just want to be an engineer instead of a marketing goon. Maybe you don't even have any social networking pages to start plugging products on.

      Since it was stated that most employees hadn't used it my guess is that it was made in one small department and the company is trying to get the entire company to use it even those not interested. It is very common to work for a company that makes some products you like and some products you don't like and some products you didn't even realize they had. (besides this is an "app" and there are few companies that will survive off the profit of one single app)

      Often these sorts of requests imply that you must do this all on your own time at home and you want a distinct line between work and personal life.

      My suggestion is just tell your mom about it. Then later when the CEO starts shouting at you with a red face you can honestly say that you seeded a very large social network.

  90. EA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So you work for EA?

  91. Get with the program. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can't get behind the products the company you work for puts out, quit and find a job at a place you can, or start your own company.. Stop wasting time/life.

  92. Re:Meh.. just tell your friends and move on with i by BluBrick · · Score: 1

    Celebs do it all the time on public TV. (promote products they probably don't use let alone like).

    Uh huh, and they get paid to do just that. If I were asked to do this, I'd ask if I have permission to use company resources to do so - including time, bandwidth and online reputation. If the answer's no, I'd ask for compensation for using my personal resources to do this work for them. I'd also consider asking to have my job description altered.

    Tell your friends you're astroturfing outside of the social networking sites and move on with your life.

    That's not necessary if his glowing endorsement of "Acme Widgets' stunning new app ParaWidget-X" comes from employee@acme.com

    My advice to the OP? Face facts. Your employers are asking you to do unpaid work for them. Change the deal to a paid one by conducting this advertising campaign on their time. Protect your personal online reputation by creating a twitter/facebook/whatever account under your employee email address. Then spam away, my friend.

    --
    Ahh - My eye!
    The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  93. Do you like it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you actually like the app and think it's a good product then I'd say promote it. If you don't, then there's nothing wrong with just keeping your mouth shut. I used to work for a company that was constantly urging its employees to astroturf the government, vote a certain way, request our government representatives support or oppose certain bills... I just ignored it. Lots of companies do it, that doesn't mean you have to play along if it goes against your own opinion.

  94. Clicking a "Like" button? by brit74 · · Score: 1

    I guess I don't think that clicking a "Like" button is that big of an infraction, and wouldn't compare it to astroturfing. When I'm looking at buying a product, the number of "Likes" I see is meaningless because all likes tells me is percentage of people who like a product times the number of people who have seen a product. If a product has only been seen 100 times but 100% of them truely like it, then it has 100 likes, but if a product has been seen a million times and only 10% of them truely like it, then it has 100,000 likes. The number of likes is meaningless because there's no "downvote" and no "rate 1 to 5" option.

    The situation where astroturfing gets on my nerves is when it's manipulating the information I'm using to decide whether or not to buy a product -- fake reviews, or fake Amazon ratings (which ranges from 1 to 5, not a single "upvote" button with no way to downvote it) get on my nerves because I use it to help me make an informed decision. I think you need to chill out if you think clicking "Like" is a serious astroturfing problem.

  95. There's an easier answer ... in fact several by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

    1. Deactivate all your social media accounts. You won't miss them.

    2. a Report them - it's consumer fraud
    b. Get fired
    c. Whistleblower lawsuit - PROFIT!

    3. Create a new account called "$nameofapp.sux" and post stuff like

    You know, this is TEH MOSTEST AWESOMEST APP EVAH!

    Not only will it enlarge your man's mandrake r00t, but it will also make you BIG BUX.

    I downloaded this 100%-sypware-free app, and within just days I was receiving so many offers of money from nigerian princes, lotteries I had never even entered, and inheritances from dead relatives that I never heard of.

    And it also gives so many nice offers for penny stocks that are sure to go to TEH MOON, so when I get me my lottery winnings, I know where to invest it all!

    And the best part - it automatically spreads the lucky offers to all my friends and other contacts so that we can ALL get rich together. It must be working - they must be so busy with their new riches that none of them are taking my calls any more, the ungrateful b*tches.

    Really, just report them (#2). There's nothing they can do in retaliation without it costing them $$$.

    --
    Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    1. Re:There's an easier answer ... in fact several by reason · · Score: 1

      Really, just report them (#2). There's nothing they can do in retaliation without it costing them $$$.

      Sure they can. They can give lukewarm (accurate but unenthusiastic) performance evaluations and references. They can choose not to put your name forward when asked to identify rising stars to whom others in the organization should be paying attention. They can listen less carefully to the proposals you put forward and give your training requests just a little less priority. They can not invite you to after-work drinks where you'd hear about opportunities ("Z will be putting out a call for proposals next week - get started now if you have an idea, because you won't have much time once the call goes out") or the kind of office gossip that could help you to work around office politics (e.g. "X doesn't get on with Y, so don't get Y involved if you want X's support on a project"). It happens all the time. It can happen without them even setting out to give you a hard time, or realizing that they are doing it. If you don't get out quickly, it's enough to jettison a career.

    2. Re:There's an easier answer ... in fact several by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1

      And what you described is grounds for a claim of constructive dismissal when you get fed up and quit - and constructive dismissal is a lot easier to prove than that they harassed you because they think you blew the whistle.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
    3. Re:There's an easier answer ... in fact several by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they don't tell you, there is no way to prove what they really fired you for. This happens all the time. Maybe they wait until the company has a down month, who knows. If they don't like you anymore, it won't be difficult. If you quit, then it's even more difficult to prove something like this. Realistically, most people wouldn't want to lose their job and fight a potentially costly battle against their old employer (and friends) over something like this.

    4. Re:There's an easier answer ... in fact several by Barbara,+not+Barbie · · Score: 1
      The OP sounds like they work for a relatively small company - one where it's possible for people to push brain farts like astro-turfing and illegal product "endorsements." That's the sort of place you end up half-hoping you'll be fired, and surprised when you make it through another week.

      But again - what costly battle? You file a complaint, the government investigates, you get $$$$. As for their friends at work - if they'll go along with making the posters' life miserable, they're not friends, so to heck with them.

      You don't have to put up with crap for a pay check.

      --
      Let's call it what it is, Anti-Social Media.
  96. What to do... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    The thing is, most of the employees have not used the app, but we are being asked to say that we like it. ... How would you deal with this?"

    I'd tell them I cannot comment on the product as I haven't used it. If I do use it and am asked to comment, it will be my honest opinion. It's okay if they want to pay me for my opinion, but I'll note that in my review...

    Will the marketing or HR people look at who has astroturfed, and who has not at raise time?

    I personally don't care about stuff like that - and it has actually served me quite well. My goal is to be trusted, not liked. Especially fun when people who don't like me - usually because they wanted me to do something questionable for them and I said "no" - ask me to solve a problem because they begrudgingly know I'm the only one who can in the time allotted. It's fun having integrity, skills and experience.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  97. Easy: Wally-strategy by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 1

    Just bill mocketing for plenty of your working hours you allegedly 'spent astroturfing' - and use the time to find a better job. That will serve them right. If your company can't find a better way to increase their revenues (writing better apps for example) they are on their way down anyway.

    --
    Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
  98. That's not Astroturfing by matthewv789 · · Score: 2

    That's just simple promotion - asking employees to mention to friends, family and other acquaintances the products or services the company offers.

    Astroturfing would be if you were pretending to be someone who DIDN'T work at the company. So long as it's a social network where your affiliation with the company is clearly visible and/or all your friends/family already know you work there, there's no ethical problem.

    You don't have to BS or anything like writing a glowing review of a product you haven't used/don't like, but simply liking or +1ing something is just a way to spread its visibility to more users.

  99. How would you deal with this? by LoyalOpposition · · Score: 2

    How would you deal with this?

    Morally? Try out the app. Write what you really think. If you don't like it, either don't say anything, or tell the company what you didn't like. Maybe they can use your input to improve the thing. Worse comes to worst, tell them that at least now they know you're truthful when you tell them something.

    ~Loyal

    --
    I aim to misbehave.
    1. Re:How would you deal with this? by ediron2 · · Score: 1

      This. Hell, my first reaction when I read that the staff doesn't use the app was thinking they don't eat their own dogfood?! They're doomed..

      Use your app. Find a friend that fits the niche and watch them use the app. Do SOMETHING, or run away.

  100. You take life way too seriously... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Are you people for real? OP is asked to make a harmless little white lie, and people advocate quitting the job and "reporting" the company?

    What do you do when your girlfriend asks if she looks fat in a pair of jeans? Do you wrestle with whether you should tell the truth? Do you quit your girlfriend and try to find a new one rather than facing the tremendous moral dilemma of whether to answer truthfully?

    You guys take life, and yourselves, way too seriously, and you don't understand how the world works.

    1. Re:You take life way too seriously... by Skapare · · Score: 1

      Well, mine was fat. So I did quit. Found a new one that wasn't. Best decision of my life ... until she left me.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  101. This is not a hard problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Posting as AC for obvious reasons. The company I work for put an app in an app store. The marketing people think it isn't selling very well, so they sent out an email asking people to get on all their social media sites and friend or like the app to build up traffic. The thing is, most of the employees have not used the app, but we are being asked to say that we like it. We just saw stories about companies not being allowed to ask employees or interview candidates for access to social sites, but what does it mean when a company asks employees to astroturf? Will the marketing or HR people look at who has astroturfed, and who has not at raise time? How would you deal with this?"

    Why don't you start by actually USING your company's software, then either share constructive criticism internally, or sincerely give it props online.

    1. Re:This is not a hard problem. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      What if it's something stupid for engineers and more appropriate for sales people?

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  102. Don't do it. by Bieeanda · · Score: 1
    You will be caught.

    Your credibility will go straight down the toilet, as will that of your company.

    Certain sites and communities will ban your sorry ass for abusing their trust.

    Fuck the marketing department. If they want people to astroturf, they can do it themselves (hilariously badly) or they can hire people to do it (which will also go over hilariously badly).

    If they actually keep tabs on who 'turfed for your app and who didn't, I strongly suggest looking for a new job, because your current one is only going to become increasingly filled with paranoid, unethical bullshit as time goes on.

    1. Re:Don't do it. by Skapare · · Score: 1

      The stockholders should be doing the astroturfing. Afterall, it's their dog in the show.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Don't do it. by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      You will be caught.

      Caught doing what? Clicking on a "like" button? Or telling your friends "hey check out my companies new product?" Unless the product is pure crap, what credibility is he losing?
      Man when my company releases a new product. I'm happy to tell people "Hey we just released this cool new product, check it out"

  103. Re:Shouldn't the Employees be familiar with the Ap by mutube · · Score: 1

    I find it appsolutely apphorrent that you've approgated responsibility for appropriate appellation of Apps.

    Sincerely,
    Appalled of Appleby

  104. I have a friend that went to work for Microsoft by Culture20 · · Score: 1

    My friend's posts on Facebook immediately following his new job were wild praises of random Microsoft software (especially Bing). I'm not sure if he was being ordered to shill, but it was rather profuse either way.

    1. Re:I have a friend that went to work for Microsoft by Skapare · · Score: 1

      You can usually tell when people are doing that without the need to check for the brown color on their nose.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:I have a friend that went to work for Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      check for the brown color on their nose.

      I don't get it; what's that supposed to mean?

    3. Re:I have a friend that went to work for Microsoft by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      He drank the koolaid. I seriously doubt he was ordered to shill. Microsoft makes enough money that the pay people to do that. But when you are immersed in the culture, you see and use more of the software than you probably did before. Maybe he did like it. Maybe it was new to him and he just wanted to share it? If he went to some other company that had lots and lots of software and starting telling you about some of the cool things he saw at work, would you automatically assume his company asked him to shill?

  105. pay by Tom · · Score: 1

    Ask for money. If marketing isn't doing its job and asks you to do it, you deserve a share of their paycheck.

    Basically, whenever the company asks you to do something they aren't paying you for, they ought to be paying for the extra. Be it time or work outside your assigned area.

    Treat your company the way it treats its customers. Sometimes a good customer gets something complimentary - as part of keeping a good relationship or whatever. But never just out of the goodness of the companies heart (it doesn't have one). It's always a calculation.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  106. Social Media Marketing - a different perspective by DaKong · · Score: 1

    I've been working in interactive advertising in New York for the last 13 years (hey, when the dot-com days ended it was the only thing left in this neck of the woods). I despise advertising. Especially the indiscriminate TV kind. God, what I wouldn't give to get back all the time I've been exposed to feminine hygiene commercials.

    But, when I've been online and experienced advertising that is actually geared toward me, it does not annoy me. I find it helpful. Likewise when a friend has forwarded something they thought I might be interested in, I often have been and have been grateful they thought of me.

    So I'll express a contrarian opinion on this subject and say that if all advertising was done in the latter way, we'd probably see it as much more of a positive than as a negative. We should all hope that advertising in general follows this model and only routes to the people who might or could find it interesting and useful.

    --
    If not us, who? If not now, when?
  107. Add a disclaimer ... by Kittenman · · Score: 1

    Be honest - say "I like this product" but add the disclaimer "I work for the company that makes this product". Marketing can't gripe about that (can they?). I've seen disclaimers on /. so it's common practice.

    Of course, if you don't like the product, why are you wasting your time working for a company that makes things you don't like?

    (Disclaimer - I work for an insurance company and have my insurance with a competitor. Why? They're not that competitive in my circumstances, and I need the $$)

    --
    "The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes" - Winston Churchill
  108. Pos and Neg review by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you don't like the app you could always create a fake profile (or 2) to use to rate it poorly, then use a profile with your name and rate it positively. That way, the rating system isn't broken, but if your company is so unscrupulous as to check which employees gave positive reviews (and it sounds like it might be) then you are ok.

  109. Answer: by flameproof · · Score: 1

    Do you have a freaking spine?

    --
    ~Just as a thing fails if it lacks a kernel, so too it fails if it lacks a skin. ~ Rumi, Discourses
  110. Not astroturfing if profile indicates employer by perpenso · · Score: 2

    "He's not being asked to astroturf. He's being asked to like the product."

    Astroturfing is astroturfing, no matter the form. Employees are being asked to falsely represent themselves as happily satisfied users of the product. That is astroturfing at its very essence. Whether you are doing it via blog posts or Facebook likes, you are still committing exactly the same ethical breach. There is no difference.

    His point is that it is *not* astroturfing if your profile identifies you as an employee or otherwise being involved. Astroturfing involves hiding the involvement.

    For example I have an iPhone / iPad app named Perpenso Calc. Its a calculator offering RPN, Scientific, Statistic, Business and Hex functionality. If I recommend it in a slashdot thread regarding calculator apps I am *not* astroturfing because my account name, "perpenso", indicates that I represent the publisher.

    FWIW, I have not asked friends, family, colleagues, etc to rate or like my app. Asking an employee to post an announcement that their project/product has shipped may be OK, but asking for ratings and likes seems to go too far. Such ratings and likes should be real.

    1. Re:Not astroturfing if profile indicates employer by msevior · · Score: 1

      Please make an android version. I'll pay for it if it works well.

      Thank you.

    2. Re:Not astroturfing if profile indicates employer by ArundelCastle · · Score: 1

      If I recommend it in a slashdot thread regarding calculator apps I am *not* astroturfing because my account name, "perpenso", indicates that I represent the publisher.

      No it really doesn't. On an internet forum using a corporate alias makes you a fanboy. At best it makes you uncreative.
      What you *should* do is a very simple "Disclosure: this is my product".
      Presuming that someone will even bother to look at your username, then connect 2 + 2 (lol amirite?) is demanding far too much investigative work from a forum reader.

      On a forum that uses Facebook for comments if it said "Works at Perpenso" then your argument would hold water. But a username? No. Absolutely no. You might as well be OracleBoy48.

    3. Re:Not astroturfing if profile indicates employer by perpenso · · Score: 1

      If I recommend it in a slashdot thread regarding calculator apps I am *not* astroturfing because my account name, "perpenso", indicates that I represent the publisher.

      What you *should* do is a very simple "Disclosure: this is my product".

      I do make such a disclosure when recommending it or comparing it to other products. IMHO that is the correct things to do. If I am just using it to illustrate some general iOS or iTunes point I may not bother.

      Presuming that someone will even bother to look at your username, then connect 2 + 2 (lol amirite?) ...

      Absolutely correct. Even calculators naively using the hardware FPU get that one correct. :-)

      ... is demanding far too much investigative work from a forum reader.

      However I don't think failing to disclose as suggested rises to astoturfing. In my mind astroturfing involves actively hiding any connection. Actively deceiving a reader who is making some sort of investigative effort.

  111. I will try to give you a sensible answer. by hey! · · Score: 1

    Should you? No. But if it's that or lose the job you're counting on to pay for little Timmy's operation, we'll understand.

    I despise the idea that your employer, who has no loyalty to you, can make demands about how you live your private life, but it's a dirty, hypocritical world out there. Sometimes you have to make short term compromises. As such compromises go, this isn't exactly betraying Anne Frank to the SS.

    But if you make it clear that you are uncomfortable doing this and they insist, I'd start looking for another job whether you decide to cave or not. The reason is that your employer does not respect you. It doesn't respect your privacy or value your honesty. You don't want to work for people like that, they''ll keep nibbling away at your dignity until accepting indignities becomes an ingrained habit.

    If you're at all in a position to say "screw that", say it. If not, do what you must, but look for a better place to work.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  112. Just asking... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    ...but have you actually *TRIED* the app? Is it any good? Does your employer have any way of actually checking to see if you have liked/reviewed/+1'd the app?

    If you've tried the app and it's decent, then why not go ahead and say so? If it sucks, however, then I probably wouldn't put my endorsement on it but then again, I'm not the one who'll be heading for the unemployment line so that's easy for me to say. If your employer doesn't really have any way of checking to see if you've "liked" or "+1'd" the app, then the choice is a lot easier. If they can verify who has and who has not endorsed the app, then you need to decide if the risk of potentially losing your job is worth violating your conscience. Unfortunately, no one here on /. can answer that question for you. Best of luck to you, whatever you decide!

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    1. Re:Just asking... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      One other option I just thought of...if the app really is crap, and you are being coerced into writing a review, you could always go *sooo* over-the-top that it's obvious the review isn't sincere. Ever see the "Joe Isuzu" commercials from the '80s? Something like that:

      "This app is *SO* good, it improved my car's fuel economy, paid for my child's college tuition, found me a supermodel girlfriend AND paid off the national debt...overnight!"

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  113. Call the SEC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it's a publicly traded company, this is clearly an illegal deceptive practice.

  114. Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hasn't the FTC come out against astroturfing, and even fines some companies for doing it?

  115. Depends on how you type it... by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    CC: boss, HR, general council
    RE:request dated (date) that I link, like, and promote our applicaiton in my private social media.

    Dear Marketing Person,

    In accordance with our companies Due Dilligence requirement I have examined the request of (person) on (date) and determined that following the suggestions therein could cause (app name) to be removed from the (app store) service. Since this request may be against our Ethics Policy, and following it may be detrimental to the company in general, I will not be able to perfrom the actions detailed.

    I strongly suggest that management bar other employees from following the request at this time, pending formal review of the contractual requirements of (app store) and the possible reprocussions should (app) be banned.

    Sincerely,
    (Employee Name).

    =====

    The lesson: if you act all furtive about your rejection you look non-compliant or threatening. If you act very publicly and give citations you are potentially heroic or at least colatterally known to be acting in the company's interests as you understand them. The bigger the company the better this works. It is -particularly- effective if your company does any government or finincial work because then "due dilligence" and "ethics" are magical words not just good ideas.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
    1. Re:Depends on how you type it... by reason · · Score: 2

      This strikes me as a very aggressive email and would only be appropriate if the work environment is already strained and management has shown that it can't be trusted to handle suggestions or discussion in a fair and open manner. Escalating the matter to HR and the general council before even opening a discussion is hostile.

      Better to clarify first, go in friendly and assume ignorance rather than evil is behind the request. Maybe "reply all" something along the lines of "we might want to be careful since this could be seen as astroturfing [link to wikipedia article]. Honest recommendations of the app from those who use it are a good, but let's not go too far."

    2. Re:Depends on how you type it... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Short version: "I quit".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  116. What? by jon3k · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should consider using the product your company develops? If you like it, then no harm done, you can share your honest opinion. If it sucks, jesus man, get the !@#$ out as quickly as possible. I can't believe you haven't even used it? I wouldn't want to work for someone who made a product I hated.

  117. easy way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    write out a page worth of praise for the product (e.g. 1000 words) and post that somewhere. you get to keep your job, and as nobody reads more than a paragraph online these days, nobody will read your astroturf. win win. (have you skipped the really really long comments on this slashdot page? see what i mean). oh, better stop writing now as i actually want you to read this.

    1. Re:easy way out by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Only people below a certain age do that. Older people don't mind 'walls of text'. Not everyone grew up texting on cell phones.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
  118. If you like your company's product by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    then you shouldn't have any qualms about promoting it...

  119. You have the last job that can't be automated by gelfling · · Score: 1

    Or can it? I think you should tell your bosses to do it with scripts and send the bots forth! Skynet is self aware and he's a dick.

  120. Illegal in Europe by pbhj · · Score: 1

    There's a European directive - the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive - that makes this illegal in Europe, http://www.out-law.com/page-10583.

  121. Keep work & personal life separate by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    My company's marketing department also asked all of the employees to facebook 'like' the company & post comments about the company. There were not any managers pushing this down on the employees. I won't touch it with a 10 foot pole. My rule is to not discuss my company on the internet that is in any what that is identifiable to my company or myself. Once you cross the line of mixing work with your personal life you are walking into a mine field. The best case scenario is that no one cares that you did it. The worst case scenario is that people start looking at your personal internet life and find something objectionable that you have said, or some strangers on the internet decide they don't like what you said and try to get you fired from your company, or you make some off hand comment about a coworker, company or work situation that lands you in hot water. It just isn't worth it.

  122. Governmentally Correct by IBitOBear · · Score: 1

    Yea, HR and General Council are heafty blows, but the poster is already saying he's worried about reprocssions.

    In a government contract related setting, however, there are apporpraite people (your ethics focal, your compliance manager, your direct report, etc.)

    The quesiton is posed as "Marketing told us all", so the response has to be "I told the very-limited subset of directly interested parties".

    Since the questioner is -aready- in fear, targeted and effective aggression -is- the only answer that works. Being correct is just icing.

    Passive aggression with "reply-all" is far more likely to tweak a managers gnads than a managerially correct action. Not knowing the size of the company, I picked titles that would be correct in general as examples to the crowd.

    The one thing managers cannot stand is weakness, if you are going to fight the issue at all, don't be a wuss about it or you will get roasted.

    --
    Innocent people shouldn't be forced to pay for inferior software development.
    --"Code Complete" Microsoft Press
    1. Re:Governmentally Correct by reason · · Score: 1

      I guess you'd need to know the personalities involved.
      If someone on my team sent the email you suggested, I'd tag them as hostile, difficult to work with, not to be trusted, and a game-player. Yes, I'd be scrabbling to put out the fire and make sure Marketing knew it had done the wrong thing, but I'd also be looking for ways to avoid having to rely on the person who had sent that email in future. Am I oversensitive? Perhaps, but I'd be anticipating trouble from them.

      If someone on my team sent the version I suggested, I'd say "Yeah, good catch. Thanks." I'd make sure it was passed on to whoever had sent or received the original email, if they hadn't already seen it and hope that was the end of it. Am I working in an organisation that would encourage astroturfing in the first place? No, but I have to believe that most people in management even in those companies - like most people anywhere - are just trying to get by and do the right thing.

    2. Re:Governmentally Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I would have the opposite reaction: I would perceive the self righteous, passive aggressive "reply all" tactic as a sign the person distespects me and is trying to undermine my authority. Had the person sent a private email to me—and then abided by my subsequent decision—I would be inclined to trust them.

      I guess it takes all types. FWIW, I would send the anonymous email to legal/marketing. Less trouble, less drama, and likely more effective. In case the GP happens to read this: I suggest running spell check if you wish for your pseudolegalese threats to be taken seriously.

    3. Re:Governmentally Correct by reason · · Score: 1

      I see the email to HR and the council as self-righteous and attempting to undermine my authority.

      I see a "reply all" in a situation like this as friendly and open discussion - as long as it is diplomatically worded and not in legalese. A private email to me or (separately) to the person who sent the email would also be good, but further action would then be needed to undo the damage. If was anonymous, it would signal a lack of trust, which I'd find disturbing, but understandable.

    4. Re:Governmentally Correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I guess it depends on the scenario. I would *only* feel undermined by an anonymous tip email to legal/marketing *if* this were an initiative that I personally came up with and only promulgated to my direct reports. I believe the scenario under discussion has to do with a marketing-led initiative, but I could be wrong.

      Personal rationale for anon email to marketing/legal:
      1) They may not have considered this issue.
      2) They may not care, and people who aren't blithely complying may therefore be perceived as a threat.

      So, this is the "friendly" solution in my opinion. It gives them fair warning they may be in for some legal issues and does not require that I risk anything to give them a heads up.

      I must say, in this scenario my personal alternative to sending the anon email to legal/marketing would be to say nothing and let the company crash and burn if it came to it. It's not like it's my money or liability.

      As for the "reply all" approach: the reason I really dislike that is that some subordinate is openly suggesting to the group that the group not comply with my directive (I read your scenario as the directive coming directly from you). Openly challenging my authority is not appreciated. Even if I am making a mistake, contact me privately and I will deliberate and retract (and give credit!). However, some self righteous, passive aggressive subordinate that did a "reply all" like that would be on my "do not trust" list. Heaven help that person if their undermining reply all happened to be in a scenario where this *wasn't* a mistake (ie. it was only a mistake in their *opinion*).

  123. Simple Answer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get paid money to advertise your products. Not kudos, not pats on the back, not empty promises of future raises... MONEY. You pay me enough money I'll advertise anything you want. But I absolutely will not do that shit for free.

  124. Like vs Review by CritterNYC · · Score: 1

    There is a big difference between liking something on Facebook and being asked to fabricate a review of a piece of software. Liking something on Facebook is basically just you spreading the word to your friends and adding to the total number of 'likes' on Facebook. You're not doing something unseemly. If they were asking you to review it or give it a 5 star rating or something, that's an entirely different story.

  125. Check your employee handbook by niftymitch · · Score: 1

    If dishonesty on an employment application or any other document is
    cause for termination the answer is obvious. This is a lot like the
    bit of "give me your password" compliance would be a clear and
    obvious expression of a character flaw -- so ignore the request.
    If necessary "unfriend" any and all company folk.

    There are also risks to you and the company because a "lie" is
    obvious intent to defraud should the product lack anything, anything
    at all.that costs the customer money or loss of money.

    This is one company memo that should go to hard copy and
    then to a safe place. Hide it behind a wall, misfiled under rut-ro
    or some such thing perhaps inside the company so there is no
    transgression of other company policy that might kick in at the door.

    However this is common, the key issue is that you never used
    or owned the product and are being asked to lie.

    Try it! Heck you might love it if you try it.

    --
    Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
  126. Hmm...depends by dcbrianw · · Score: 1
    I think if your company is basically asking its employees to voluntarily "like" the app in the spirit of trying to help the company, I find that completely in bounds. Of course, each person who "like"s it, to preserve the perception that he/she genuinely likes it should probably have at least some experience with it. On the other hand, if you company is expecting this as a condition of working for them or treating employees who do or don't do this differently, I think that's crossing the line from professional life into personal life, and hence not in bounds.

    I'm not sure how this relates to preventing businesses from requesting facebook passwords of personal accounts, as the law Maryland has passed, because they don't need that information to necessarily see what you as an employee "like". They do, however, have to have you "friend" them, assuming that's information you keep private. And requiring that is definitely crossing the line that divides professional life from personal life. So at this point, since such a law is about passwords, my best guess is that a judicial court would interpret the intent of the law such that it would prevent a business from requiring that employee or perspective employee "friend" the business.

    On those grounds, I think you could take a fairly strong case to your HR department that a requirement. However, I'm neither a lawyer or a judge, so keep that in mind. :-)

  127. Salesmanship by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

    They are asking you to take on a a role as salesman in addition to your normal duties. There's nothing wrong with that. In fact, if you have any ethical objection to selling what you make, then you shouldn't be making it in the first place.

    Tell them your considerations about being an ethical salesman and the proper rewards for being one.

  128. Re:Collect evidence. Offer silence for money. Sue. by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

    That's extortion, which is a felony.

    --
    Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  129. It's not astroturfing if they only asked by godglike · · Score: 1
    Until it comes from your boss, it's only a request and you can say "no".

    If you're proud of the application, and you think it might help some people you know, by all means tell people about it.

    Until it's an order and you disagree with the text of that order, you don't have a problem.

    If it is an order and you disagree with the statement, then you have to consider whether that damage to your reputation is excessive given the consequences of not complying.

  130. marketers tell lies, in other news, water is wet. by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1
    Have they made it known that they will be checking on you to see if you have told enough lies and to their satisfaction? Is there going to be quality control of some kind? "Gee Johnson, you posted a lovely review on your Facebook page, but it just seems, I dunno, kind of phoney. I'm going to need you to go ahead and rewrite that lie over the weekend."

    My take on this? Fuck'em. If you need the job and you feel your job is on the line over this, then feel free to lie to them. Tell them you made all kinds of wonderful comments about them. If they find out you didn't, what are they going to do? Fire you for lying about telling the lies they asked you to say? I personally think that astro-turfing, since it is a published act by a paid employee of the company, to run afoul of the truth in advertising laws. As far as I know, in most of the developed world, a company cannot require you to act in an illegal manner as part of your job. (lord knows it happens anyway all too often)

    Let them fire you and then sue them for it.

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  131. Viral is not a strategy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen lots of companies do this (including my own). Short answer is if you don't think it's right, don't do it. My opinion:
    * A product should stand out on its own. It shouldn't matter if the employees like it or not. The masses will ultimately determine its fate.
    * There are lots of articles about this, but viral marketing is not a strategy. Astroturfing and trying to make a product viral doesn't work. This article about it gives a good explanation: http://www.geekwire.com/2012/hey-startups-users-arent-free/

    That said, I'm not saying quit your job or look for another one because of this. Lots of good companies have idiots with harebrained ideas, but follow your gut. You likely have good reasons for defecting from the collective. Even better, replace their ideas with better ones.

  132. My speculation on these bums, and advice therefrom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh boy! Posting anonymously in case I ever end up in this purgatory myself. My guerilla passive-aggressive advice:

    • A. Anyone, stupid enough to send a broadcast e-mail telling everyone to do that, is likely clueless enough about social media that they won't be able to tell whether you did it or not. If they ask directly, tell them the truth of the same sort as their own truth works, like: (1) (credit viperidaenz (2515578) in a previous reply) that you "posted good comments on all the company controlled social media accounts I have access to"; or (2) that you didn't understand it at the time and it's a dead issue now; or (3) you've heard that those sites block your access if you click the wrong thing or that you can catch those virus things from everyone else who friended it and you didn't want to get any computers infected.
    • B. See A, but with extra vigor. If they ask you what happened directly, assist them in collecting these "artificially assisted facts" they're fond of: Tell them that the app store/social site said friending/liking the app was temporarily disabled when you did it, and said something about spam or malware problems with that account. Maybe someone will get spooked about what mysterious, hard-to-discover, occasional warnings might be scaring the crap out of loads of customers then disappearing before the company can catch it.
    • C. Anyone, arrogant enough to request behavior that blatantly, is arrogant enough to be just as blatant to you again when they think they they are bossing you around instead of defending against you. So:
      • 1. Make sure you have already gotten an off-site record of them telling you to do it.
      • 2. Make a corporate account, with their own name on it, and do what they say with it. Don't bother bringing it up to them unless they ask, because that would be suspicious.
      • 3. Whenever they ask you about it, make sure you're recording it, and tell them the truth, and if they frown, act clueless and say that's what they told you to do; when they explain to you that it's not what they meant, and why anyone would want you to use your "home login" for work stuff, you have it on record.
      • 4. Get that record out of the office quickly but discreetly.
      • 5. Don't reveal it to anyone without consulting a lawyer, especially if it's an audio recording: In a lot of places (maybe most U.S. states), it is actually illegal to record a conversation without all the parties' consent. (If you live in a place where only one party's wish to record it is enough to make it legal, then lucky you.)
    • D. Lather, rinse, repeat. Keep being appropriately cooperative about this until they give up or are sitting there trying to get you to hit the button while they watch you, in which case, my advice is: Suddenly act like you're sure the computer has locked up, and give it a three-finger salute and screw with things, completely out of control, until they scream and walk away.

    On the other hand, if they read Slashdot, then you're really screwed, aren't you?

  133. Do it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Fulfill the request at your earnest. Write GLOWING REVIEWS! NO bad points whatsoever! These who claim bad things are LIARS! You are ECSTATIC! This product solved ALL your problems!

    (...simply make sure that anyone who reads your reviews and opinions, can tell you're astroturfing. This should create the desired effect.)

  134. Worried? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given how flaky facebook use is, you can always claim to have liked it, especially if you use a cell or tablet client for it.

  135. Evil Twin, Clone, Fake Persona, Guy Fawkes Mask! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FTW! Sell the product, not yourself.

  136. Think of it this way... by TheInternetGuy · · Score: 2

    I think this is sort of like asking Slashdot whether or not you should jerk off in public to drum up business because your employer asks you.

    And the answer is of-course it depends.

    It depends on - in no particular order:

    - Is it in line with your morals and ethics?
    - Can it be construed to be part of your job description?
    - Is it legal in the jurisdiction you are in?
    - Does it pay well?
    - Would you enjoy doing it?
    - Do you need the money?
    - What happens if you refuse?
    - Do you have other offers?

    Answer these questions to your self, and you probably know what to do.

    --
    If my comment didn't sound as good in your head as it did in mine, then I guess we all know who's to blame
  137. Like by chrismcb · · Score: 2

    There are two parts to this question:
    A) Should I like the product?
    Yes, unless you totally hate it. If you like it, then like it. If you haven't seen it, well it is YOUR companies product, so you like it right? I mean in some sense it is making you money, so why not like it? Obviously if you feel it is a piece of crap, then don't like it. Otherwise what is the problem?
    B) Will there be repercussions if you don't like it? As in will some PR drone go through the list and see who liked it?
    I guess that is a remote possibility, but if you are the paranoid, you might want to look for another job (to relieve your stress levels). Your company doesn't really care if you click the like button or not. They just want the like # to be larger.
    If you feel THAT strongly about it, then don't like it. But from the sound of it, there are other issues going on at your company you need to resolve.

  138. Social advertising != astroturfing by wye43 · · Score: 2

    You are exaggerating. Astroturfing is a WAY more serious manifestation.

    It looks to me that in this case they are just begging you to support the product you are working on. There is no way for them to verify you actually did, but maybe (big maybe) the company doing better will reflect on you as well, so it may be in your own interest to show a bit of support. People do this ALL the time, its both legally and morally correct, and its still just a choice for you, they are not forcing you to do this.

    People are doing some really crazy fucked up shiat out there, this is nothing. Nothing. Do whatever you want, and create less drama.

  139. Why are you asking us? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

    External validation isn't going to ease your conscience in the long run. You should pay attention to how you genuinely feel about it, because you already know whether you are comfortable doing it or not. Asking slashdot is counter-productive attempt at rationalisation.

    --
    (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  140. astro turd by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    my last job was astro turfing for VOIP companies that wanted to push the cloud. you do what you gotta do, to do what you wanna do. poverty sucks.

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  141. So try the software and write a review by msobkow · · Score: 1

    If they insist on staff writing reviews of the software, then take some company time to download and review the software, and write one up.

    Personally I have no problem with a company asking for my opinions on a product, even if I'm an employee, provided they're ok with an honest opinion based on my actual experiences with it.

    But I'm a harsh critic, so I can't imagine any employer ever wanting me to do so publicly rather than internally for the tech team.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  142. Might be illegal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in a staff meeting a few weeks ago and someone (somewhat jokingly) suggested we all give thumbs up to a certain social media site. This was immediately followed by a manager saying "oh, no, don't do that". Apparently she thought it was illegal, based on some recent FTC rulings. If you are receiving compensation from a party, you can't give anonymous praise for it. I'm no lawyer, so I don't know for sure, but I have seen more rumblings recently that I suspect this might be true.

    (I think it would still be legitimate if you identify your possible bias)

  143. Why astroturf? by kyrio · · Score: 1

    Why astroturf for a company without payment? They are just asking you to advertise for them, for free! If they want ads on your social media pages, they can pay for it. It's not that hard to figure this out. Go to whoever is managing this request and tell them you will advertise just like any other website, and give them a rate for a daily/weekly/monthly ad, depending on what they want to go with. If they want it to be an outright lie like "this is great, you guys should try it", they can pay you double for putting your name on the line. If they want an actual advertisement, such as a banner or text ad that's put up as such, "this is the company I work for, you guys should support us", as an example, they can pay a somewhat lower rate. Get a brain moran!

  144. Apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If employees are not willing to use it or find any relevant use for it then your marketing dpt had failed miserably and THAT is why it's not selling /being downloaded

    let's say your company sells plungers,,,,and built an App for .99$ so people can browse their plunger inventory and find the closest store.

    most apps are totally irrelevant or is for a very small number of quirky people, maybe they all work at your office?

  145. Don't Do It. Ever. by forbin_meet_hal · · Score: 2
    I advise companies large, small, tiny and gigantic in terms of this kind of thing.

    There is never any justification for this activity. Ever.

    I tell people: 95% of the time, I can appeal to someone's God-given instinct to want to do the right thing at all times. 5% of the time, this doesn't work. So I resort to putting wild-eyed fear into that person in terms of what's going to happen when (not if) they get caught.

    Your employer might have heard of Reverb Communications?

    I'm reading some phenomenally bad advice here that takes the form of "Why don't you just try the software and vote it up if you like it?" Fact is, the Federal Trade Commission won't see it that way. You're a paid advocate. End of story.

    You can encourage friends to try it out, disclosing to them that your employer is involved.

  146. Really? by cavebison · · Score: 1

    Come on, this is an ethical issue? Like there aren't worse things in the world. They're not asking you to create fake accounts, just to hit the Like button.

    I'm sure you've Liked stupider things than that app many times a day. Who cares?

  147. Re:Hey, Slashdot, I have a question too!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, Slashdot? Why???????????

  148. Well-timed answer at BoingBoing & The Oatmeal by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Boing-Boing conveniently just posted a pointer to an appropriate cartoon over at The Oatmeal called How to get More Likes on Facebook.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  149. ChaCha? by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

    Are we talking about ChaCha? They did that about a year ago I believe. Somewhere, I posted the email about it and left a review of their app on the Mac Store or wtfever it is iPhones use. A more direct answer is: I exposed the bastards. Fuck them.

  150. Re:Collect evidence. Offer silence for money. Sue. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get evidence of it. Ask for $50K for you to not publish evidence the company is astroturfing. Wait for them to fire you, and sue.

    At least that is how it shoud work out legally.

    That right there is why the world hates America.