Slashdot Mirror


Icons That Don't Make Sense Anymore

theodp writes "The Floppy Disk Icon, observes Scott Hanselman, means 'save' for a whole generation of people who have never seen one. That, and other old people icons that don't make sense anymore — Radio Buttons, Clipboards, Bookmarks, Address Books and Calendars, Voicemail, Manila Folder, Handset Phone, Magnifying Glass and Binoculars, Envelopes, Wrenches and Gears, Microphones, Photography, Televisions, Carbon Copies and Blueprints — are the subject of Hanselman's post on icons that are near or past retirement age, whose continued use is likely to make them iconic glyphs whose origins are shrouded in mystery to many."

713 comments

  1. Awesome! by rwa2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Let's start a concerted effort to replace them all with emoticons and lolspeak! It's the only language the younger generation understands nowadays, and it will surely withstand the test of time, at least until everyone (or at least the majority of the world's population) speaks Chinese.

    file save: => 101010
    radio buttons -> mutually exclusive buttons: oooOoo
    clipboards -> tablets: [_]
    bookmarks -> googling: [I'm feeling lucky]
    Address books -> meatspace latitude: #
    Calendars -> evites: [why are you late!]
    Voicemail -> audiospam: (_o.O_)
    Manila folder -> tag: [_^gt;
    Handset phone -> smartphone: [_]-
    Magnifying glass -> antburner: --O
    Binoculars -> autofilter: >-
    Envelopes -> GPG header: -- GPG Block --
    Wrenches -> Text XML settings: <?xml?>
    Gears -> Binary XML settings: 0_o
    Microphones -> smartphones: [_]-
    Photography -> smarthpones: [_]-
    Televisions -> tablets: [_]
    Carbon Copies -> DRM: Unskippable [FBI WARNING:]
    Blueprints -gt; code: .cpp

    OK, that was easy, next!

    1. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Did you design a linux GUI already? If not, you're hired!

    2. Re:Awesome! by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Funny

      Too hard. Why not just update the devices icons allude to, as to avoid any confusion?

      file save: => microSD card
      radio buttons -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      clipboards -> monolith-shaped tablet
      bookmarks -> monolith-shaped... eReader?
      Address books -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      Calendars -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      Voicemail -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      Manila folder -> microSD card
      Handset phone -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      Magnifying glass -> that one is still ok
      Binoculars -> also ok
      Envelopes -> microSD card
      Wrenches -> drawing of a $company employee
      Gears -> drawing of a $company employee
      Microphones -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      Photography -> monolith-shaped smartphone
      Televisions -> monolith-shaped tablet
      Carbon Copies -> microSD card
      Blueprints -> open source monolith-shaped smartphone/tablet

    3. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you think if everyone will start use an "iPhone" or Galaxy as there icon to replace Handsets, no body is suing anyone for "it looks black with round corners" ?

    4. Re:Awesome! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 5, Interesting
      You are missing the point:

      No one has the slightest idea what the icons are. Now that screens have higher resolutions, they cant see them anyway.

      What we need is drop down menus with words in and not that blasted Unity crap.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Awesome! by Patch86 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To be fair, the Unity HUD thing is pretty nifty (the HUD, not the Dash- which is still not nifty). You hit Alt and you get a small text entry box. You type, and it returns every menu item in the programme you're using that matches the words. Surprisingly useful way of not having to deal with the drop-down menus.

    6. Re:Awesome! by war4peace · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The "Save" icon can be replaced with a tiny pic of Jesus with his hands high in the air. For any unsaved file, replace it with a tiny pic of the Underlord.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    7. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uhhh...except for devices with an "i" in the front of them frankly i haven't seen very many "higher resolution" devices, in fact when it comes to laptops if anything they are going lower resolution with most sub 15 inchers being 1366x768.

      And my boys were too young to remember floppies but that doesn't mean they don't know what the floppy icon means, they just don't call it a floppy but a "save icon". Just because the symbol BEHIND the icon doesn't mean anything to the younger generations does not mean the icon itself is bad.

      I learned just recently how important those icons are when I took on the task of teaching a computer illiterate neighbor how to use a PC. He can now do basic tasks in most programs because the same icons are used in multiple programs so all he had to do was learn those basic icons to know how to do those functions, whether on his XP desktop or Win 7 netbook. again he doesn't know the meaning behind the symbols but frankly that doesn't matter, all that matters is the icons are easily recognizable and similar across platforms and applications.

      So I wouldn't be so quick to just toss them aside, especially since i seriously doubt the majority of devices will have retina displays for quite awhile. Besides if we based it on modern devices there would probably be only 3 or 4 icons, an SD card, a laptop, a flash stick, and a smartphone. So many devices have consolidated that there really isn't enough relevant icons to go around IMHO.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    8. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I still don't understand why we have to "Save" documents in today's computer age. What's wrong with Auto-save and Undo? Undo is a simply red arrow pointing counter clockwise. Redo is green and clockwise.

      Search icons are not necessary either. Have a text field with localized text "Search" that goes away when you activate the field.

      As far as I'm concerned Folders/Directories can just be squares containing other squares.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    9. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that. Now I can scratch 1 new gizmo on my list of things to learn (the dash, lenses and the hud). If only the help was that consice.

      My only gripe with this is that I have to wait for a result even on todays machines. There's no good reason it couldn't be fast on a 15 year old Pentium let alone one made last year. Is it really choking on the data set of a single application menu or is there more to it then that?

    10. Re:Awesome! by mikael_j · · Score: 2

      As far as I'm concerned Folders/Directories can just be squares containing other squares.

      Or, in a metaphor that works both in the real, physical world and on computers (as a reference to objects): A directory is an image of an open box with other boxes in it.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    11. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Save" icon can be replaced with a tiny pic of Jesus with his hands high in the air. For any unsaved file, replace it with a tiny pic of Sodomy

      FTFY

    12. Re:Awesome! by kno3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No one has the slightest idea what the icons are.

      It would take quite the academic to not know what binoculars are. Seriously, almost everything in the world is a throwback/reference to something that nobody uses/knows what it is any more. Compared to the English language, these icons are stupidly up to date. Fact is, they become self referencing and everyone knows what they mean. I don't want a big long box that says Address book when I can click on an easily recognisable icon. Stop fucking about with a system that works perfectly because of some flawed ideology.

    13. Re:Awesome! by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      A microSD card? Honestly? What if microSD goes the way of the dodo soon? You should replace those with pictures of monolith-shaped smartphones showing pictures of clouds.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    14. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 5, Funny

      wow! a gui with a cli... that's innovation right there

    15. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      what about just basic shapes, like a filled circle for save, a filled square for copy, an open square for paste, etc.

      de-associate icons with tech and the problem of being out of date goes out of date

    16. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      For any unsaved file, replace it with a tiny pic of Sodomy

      ...or a pornographic animated gif

      if you don't save, and there's a blackout or your microsoft software behaves like microsoft software and just dies without warning, you're fucked

    17. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      why is undo red and redo green? red is usually associated with something bad and green with something good, but i don't know of any gooderer command than good ol' undo in any program

      users feel comfortable with the process of saving manually. its more ergonomics and human factors than progression of technology; technology may be evolving at a great rate of knots, but the beings that use them aren't so much

      i think if you fast forward 50 years, icons will be basic symbols like the power button circle with the line through it, or shapes like filled/open squares, colors, etc.
      but i think there may be some tech-associated symbols that are retained; a cog literally has nothing to do with modern computers, but they are synonymous with configuration/settings, and i think this will be the case for the foreseeable future

    18. Re:Awesome! by allo · · Score: 1

      i think you're not understanding the point in using icons.

    19. Re:Awesome! by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      He is lead interface design developer for Ubuntu.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    20. Re:Awesome! by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      "Uhhh...except for devices with an "i" in the front of them frankly i haven't seen very many "higher resolution" devices, in fact when it comes to laptops if anything they are going lower resolution with most sub 15 inchers being 1366x768."

      Stop buying the cheap crap. Wifes new Dell Alienware 15" has 1920X1080. The only place I see the screes staying as crappy low res is on the stuff made for the poor people at the sub $700.00 level for laptops.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    21. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why we have to "Save" documents in today's computer age.

      So that I can open a document, work on it and close without saving or save under a new name.

      I don't understand why it isn't configuarable on a per-application basis with the menu items intact and the addition of an autosave toggle below save and save as.

    22. Re:Awesome! by billyswong · · Score: 1

      Cog = COnfiG

    23. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i think you're reading into it too much. either that or lmao, good one!

    24. Re:Awesome! by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 5, Informative

      you morons aren't actually assuming that a radio button has anything to do with an actual radio are you? that would be just sad

      Great, then "read and weep" works doubly in this case: http://www.reddit.com/r/technology/comments/tfmb4/til_why_radio_buttons_are_called_radio_buttons/

    25. Re:Awesome! by bhtooefr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Although it has gone down - a couple years ago, 15" could be 1920x1200 easily, and seven years ago, if you had lots of cash, it could be 2048x1536.

      I've actually built a laptop around a mix of ThinkPad components (15" 2048x1536 LCD equivalent to the one used in medical configurations of the R50p, chassis from a 15" T60, and motherboard+ancillaries from a 14.1" 4:3 T61p (talk about unobtanium)) just to get a 2048x1536 screen with 8 gigs of RAM, spending over $1000 to do it (and I already had the screen and a couple of the ancillaries) when I could get a just as fast laptop for $500, purely because of the screen.

    26. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A company employee / computer fixer guy is just a regular shoulders-and-head icon but with a sideways baseball cap on so you know he's working. Problems:

      1. What way is the baseball hat pointing, because if he's one of those fuckers from the other side of town I'm going to cap his skinny dayglo ass reppuhzent

      2. Baseball hats are cool, oh I get it, I'll be cool if I go into this Byzantine menu system and start changing everything

    27. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like ALT+F2 in KDE for a long time..

    28. Re:Awesome! by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      Even though you could see things sharply, it soon gets annoying to look at small things all the time. And, the further away you can sit from your monitor, the easier for the eyes.

    29. Re:Awesome! by nikolardo · · Score: 2

      Manila folder -> tag: [_^gt;

      As sarcastic as I assume thas was - why, in this day and age, do we have to use manilla folders instead of tags?
      Why is the internet more advanced and easier to use that my own computer, in terms of searching for and finding things?
      Why can't I have a file manager that lets me MANAGE files - give them artist, source, copyright, etc tags as well as just #tags, instead of one that lets me - get this - move files around, copy, paste, and link them, and change their names.

    30. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was the GUI.

    31. Re:Awesome! by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      I (GP) have just bought a T61p off ebay, and installed gnome-panel-fallback but technology is going backwards? WTF?

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    32. Re:Awesome! by 19061969 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't be silly. He's far too talented for that. Maybe if we gave him a frontal lobotomy first though...

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    33. Re:Awesome! by smallfries · · Score: 0

      Wow. Really?

      I can't believe that you missed the point of his post so completely. Did you really read it, or just skim the first couple of entries, miss the painfully obvious pattern and then post the most self-humiliating reply that you could? Try reading it again. Maybe see if the words are familiar between items on the list and see if he is making some kind of wider point...

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    34. Re:Awesome! by Hatta · · Score: 1

      How is that any different than popping open a console with a hotkey and using tab completion?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    35. Re:Awesome! by Hatta · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What exactly does an illiterate person do with a PC?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    36. Re:Awesome! by dreamchaser · · Score: 2

      And you sound like a petulant child. What this whole thread seems to miss is those 'outdated' icons have taken on new meanings, much like language does over time. Children may have never seen a floppy drive but they know what the icon means and does.

    37. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not one of these guys.

    38. Re:Awesome! by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

      And my boys were too young to remember floppies but that doesn't mean they don't know what the floppy icon means, they just don't call it a floppy but a "save icon". Just because the symbol BEHIND the icon doesn't mean anything to the younger generations does not mean the icon itself is bad.

      Good point. Keeping the old icons is often better than replacing them with arbitrary new ones. An example:

      In MS Word 2010, the status of tracking changes is indicated by a stylized document in the menu. When tracking changes is active, it is highlighted in yellow. But there is no hint what the highlighting means, and it is easily overlooked too (yellow vs. white = not a big difference). Why, oh why, couldn't they stick to the good old checkbox?

      --
      C - the footgun of programming languages
    39. Re:Awesome! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      Actually, just because the underlying tech of the old icons is gone doesn't mean they don't have value. People who love to pretend to be UI experts also love to pretend that previously acquired knowledge and old habits don't matter.

      A good trademark doesn't need to be descriptive.

      An anachronism may be perfectly fine for a UI element.

      You've got to first prove the alternative (Unity,MacOS) is actually any better.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    40. Re:Awesome! by Ghoser777 · · Score: 2

      I actually despise auto-save. There are countless times that I make changes to a document to see what would happen as opposed to making permanent changes. The worst case is the grade book program from my school - we used to have to hit save to write our changes to the grade book server. Now, if I accidentally overwrite a students grade, there's no way to get the old grade back.

      --
      James Tiberius Kirk: "Spock, the women on your planet are logical. No other planet in the galaxy can make that claim."
    41. Re:Awesome! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You might actually want to control what the savepoint is since the computer can't read your mind and determine if you've changed it.

      Rolling back every single change seems like a collosal bother.

      Pretty retarded design concept really. In truth all of our modern Apple worshipers have nothing on the guys that built the VMS shell.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    42. Re:Awesome! by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      It's great for limiting the amount of information you need to sift through at any given level of the tree. A flattened organizational structure just gives the user information overload and makes them flee to inappropriate and archaic means of storing their information just so they can get some control over it.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    43. Re:Awesome! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No one has the slightest idea what the icons are.

      It would take quite the academic to not know what binoculars are. Seriously, almost everything in the world is a throwback/reference to something that nobody uses/knows what it is any more. Compared to the English language, these icons are stupidly up to date. Fact is, they become self referencing and everyone knows what they mean. I don't want a big long box that says Address book when I can click on an easily recognisable icon. Stop fucking about with a system that works perfectly because of some flawed ideology.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politics_and_the_English_Language

      Experts agree... the English language is fucked.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    44. Re:Awesome! by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      Facebook.

    45. Re:Awesome! by Sique · · Score: 1

      I think you don't understand what icons are. Look at the icons on an old tape recorder (<<, ||, >, >> etc.pp.). They are completely disassociated from any technology, and they were understandable at the time. And nevertheless they were icons = pictures following very strict design rules.

      (The old christian icons, where the word icon actually comes from, had strictly codified rules how to portrait each saint, so laymen could recognize them without being able to read the descriptions.)

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    46. Re:Awesome! by Sique · · Score: 1

      The point in this case was not the usage of radio buttons, it was calling them "radio buttons" - who actually still has a radio with preset stations, where once one button is operated, all other buttons mechanically jump back into the "off" position?

      (I actually think the handset icon is not "old tech", as I am still installing completely new handsets as part of my job ;) ).

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    47. Re:Awesome! by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      Wow, some of the moderators care about their computers not saving for them. Is this sort of a vote against big computer like big government?

    48. Re:Awesome! by Sique · · Score: 2

      There is a lot wrong with "autosave & undo", because I often have configuration files which are pretty similar, and I open one as a template, modify it and then save it with a new name. "Autosave & undo" would immediately overwrite the file I use as a template.

      No, there are valid reasons to especially request the original file to be overwritten with the one currently in the editor buffer, and if it was only to keep the old one as a "known good" roll back option if the new file doesn't work as expected.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    49. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, basically every icon gets replaced by a picture of a smartphone. With the appropriate app highlighted. With the icon. Of a smartphone. With the...

    50. Re:Awesome! by Junta · · Score: 1

      Not quite. You type 'profile preferences' and it tries to invoke the profile preferences menu item from gnome terminal. ALT-F2 invokes applications, not menu items. However, when I tried it, it didn't even work (it seemed able to enumerate the menue items, but didn't invoke them much of the time).

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    51. Re:Awesome! by cynyr · · Score: 1

      where is the laptop with better than 1080P screen (apart from the 17" macbookpro)? for that matter where is my 20" desktop monitor with 3840x2160 or so? and don't give me that shit about font being hard to read; pixels != points. 12point font should always be 1/6" tall reguardless of the DPI of the screen... Granted I don't know of any desktop system that does this correctly, so here we are stuck at about 96DPI for screens. In fact higher DPI screens should make smaller font sizes more readable.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    52. Re:Awesome! by msobkow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every time you have to take your hand off the keyboard to grab the mouse or flick the trackpad, you lose time.

      Every time you take your hand off the mouse or trackpad and line it up on the keyboard again, you lose time.

      The idiot who came up with the idea of requiring both mouse and keyboard input for one UI metaphor was a complete and utter freakin' MORON with absolutely NO UI design experience worth noting.

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    53. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just trolling or have you really never seen a radio with station buttons?

    54. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with your sarcasm. However, anyone who supports changing icons needs to realize the universality of these symbols. I can go to a computer in any country of the world and if it run Windows I can find my way around. Same with iOS. It is called ease of use. How many out there know that Hi, Bye , Ok, Hello and a multitude of these words are used in that form in countries throughout the world? Conventions work. Just think if words were used and what programming would require to fit every language. So the writer was looking to start a discussion or is just a numb-nut (or both)

    55. Re:Awesome! by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      who actually still has a radio with preset stations, where once one button is operated, all other buttons mechanically jump back into the "off" position?

      But it doesn't have to be mechanical buttons - I've got a modern electronic radio, but when I press one of the presets, it switches to that station and simultaneously switches away from whatever station I was previously listening to.

      For contrast, imagine if they were "checkboxes" instead of "radio buttons" - pressing one would result in listening to two stations at once, and then you'd have to go back and de-select the previous station. Only a geek could rationalize a UI like that: "But it's better that way: what if you want to listen to two stations at once? Radio buttons inhibit your freedom!")

      I think radio buttons are a useful analogy, though perhaps there are better names out there - maybe something like "channels", but that focuses on one particular application of the control, rather than the functionality of the control itself.

    56. Re:Awesome! by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Well, "Save" in MacOS Lion now generally means "Save your work here, mark this as a version", i.e. checkpoint it. If you quit an application, it auto-saves, but previous versions are still available. Heck, if you shut down while apps are open, it doesn't ask you if you want to quit or save, it just auto-saves it, since you can always revert to an earlier version (or bring up both versions to compare them). It then auto-reopens everything when you start back up.

    57. Re:Awesome! by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd personally like to hear what people THINK are good icons for these functions. What do you think is a good visual cue for you, to mean "save"? Why? What do you think is a good visual cue for people not like you, to mean "save"?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    58. Re:Awesome! by hodagacz · · Score: 1

      Computer illiterate...

    59. Re:Awesome! by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      I open one as a template, modify it and then save it with a new name. "Autosave & undo" would immediately overwrite the file I use as a template.

      Instinctively saving (which I tend to do about every other sentence) without changing the name first has the same effect - I finally learned (after screwing up WAY too many times) to ALWAYS change the name FIRST ("save as..."), and THEN make the changes and save again. That usage pattern is now burned into my brain, to the point that I get nervous when I see someone else modifying a template without doing a "save as" first!

    60. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To your point, think about power icon. Where did this thing come from? What does it mean? Is it suppose to be a plug?

      Oh, its a reference to engineering diagrams. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_symbol

    61. Re:Awesome! by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

      Edit Slashdot stories.

    62. Re:Awesome! by NJRoadfan · · Score: 1

      Because 98% of panel production is for HDTVs these days, the smaller ones of which are..... 1366x768. Manufacturers are just taking advantage of volume production to keep costs down.

    63. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you really never seen a 3 year old play flash games?

    64. Re:Awesome! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the Unity HUD thing is pretty nifty (the HUD, not the Dash- which is still not nifty). You hit Alt and you get a small text entry box. You type, and it returns every menu item in the programme you're using that matches the words. Surprisingly useful way of not having to deal with the drop-down menus.

      that's still far, far away form the usability of drop down menus.
      why? because you can see what the friggin commands are right there, you can even familiriaze yourself with the things the application can do by going through the menus.

      that's the point of a gui, you don't need to know (all) the commands beforehand. when they're in standard locations you can at least save a work without knowing anything about the app. in many ways windows 3.11 era was pretty good when it came to just sitting on the machine not knowing shit about the os or programs and just being productive right away.

      this is the most ridiculous use of floppy image ever though http://www.google.com/search?q=metro save icon&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi

      not only on windows phones(so far on which it shipped on) do you not have a floppy drive.. you don't have any removable media! it's like it's just fucking with you.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    65. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      My only gripe with this is that I have to wait for a result even on todays machines. There's no good reason it couldn't be fast on a 15 year old Pentium let alone one made last year. Is it really choking on the data set of a single application menu or is there more to it then that?

      wandering off topic, I'll speculate (or rather, educatedly-guess) that this is the unintended consequence of highly nested object-oriented programming. All of that object creation for each menu, then each item in the menu costs.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    66. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Experts agree... the English language is fucked.

      Which, oddly enough, is partly why it is so successful. English is the 'open source' of languages. Anybody can 'edit' it, adding new terms, letting others fall out of usage. It adopts features from every other languages shamelessly, squeezing them in anyplace where they kinda make sense. It is an example of the 'bazaar' method of design. It will never be pure, never by clean, never be well-structured, but it will continue to muddle through.

      To the point, a quote from Andrew Jackson: "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word!" - perhaps the earliest example of the sentiment more recently expressed regarding Perl: "There's more than one way to do it."

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    67. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Just make them all the same shape. Avoids confusion, all that pesky learning. Just guess what it does! If you guess right, the file is saved. If not, it sucks for you! Just to make things interesting, change their positions randomly.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    68. Re:Awesome! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      Facebook?

    69. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      well, they don't physically jump in and out, but I think every car radio still has preset station buttons.

      Which reminds me - I still miss the old Apple keyboards with the physical Caps Lock key. Since that's a special case of setting a state, it was very nice to have that tactile feedback. Little lights in arbitrary places do not suffice.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    70. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Angry Birds :p

    71. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      He does have a narrow point - old radios had buttons that physically pushed in, and only one could be in at a time. A rather complicated mechanical linkage accomplished this. Now the state is identified by something in the display, typically.

      I know that there are pieces of equipment around my house that have physical buttons that pop in and out according to which one is set but I can't think what they are offhand.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    72. Re:Awesome! by voidphoenix · · Score: 1

      Circle, Square, Triangle, X? :)

    73. Re:Awesome! by rev0lt · · Score: 1

      where is the laptop with better than 1080P screen

      You mean, like those 17" bulky Sony Vaio that are almost unreadable?

      12point font should always be 1/6" tall reguardless of the DPI of the screen...

      So what is the point of higher resolution if you don't get more detail or real estate? My eyes are about 50cm from a 23" 1920x1080 TFT, and I can't distinguish individual pixels. What would I gain by using a higher resolution, if I kept the font size the same?

      In fact higher DPI screens should make smaller font sizes more readable

      And slower to render. But that isn't true anymore. Most high-res laptops (>=1440x900) will provide you a near "pixel-free" image, at confortable distance you won't distinguish individual dots, so there is no real need for higher resolution displays _exept_ if you need the screen real estate (and if you need, you'll want smaller font sizes to go with that).

    74. Re:Awesome! by Sique · · Score: 1

      But this is something quite different, at least from a tactile point of view. The modern buttons at a radio are more like function keys, where pressing one button starts a new function, which keeps running until one stops or starts another function. But remember the radio buttons of old (and those of tape recorders and such), where there was a real mechanical reset of all other buttons? Even if you somehow managed to activate two buttons at once (with the recording button on the tape recorder, it was actually meant to be that way), each other button was a reset button for the currently running function, and if you didn't push it thoroughly but only touched it, you could stop the current function without starting a new one.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    75. Re:Awesome! by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      The addition of contextual pop-up menus to normal menus at the top of the screen or window, is much more intuitive than a bunch of Egyptian hieroglyphics icons. Most people still know how to read. Icons were generally used in the days before people knew how to read. Clicking the right mouse button or using 2 fingers to click the trackpad while the cursor is on a given object on the screen brings up a menu of the most likely choices to manipulate or change that object. Icons are for little children who don't know how to read.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    76. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      That application would be an excellent candidate for change control. Every change should be tracked, including the IP address from whence it came. An audit trail, IOW. Just in case.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    77. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Wow! I wake up to troll mods. I didn't know it was trollish to suggest removing save! Learn something new every day.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    78. Re:Awesome! by Dexter+Herbivore · · Score: 2

      My biggest complaint with this article, is that anyone who works in an office knows what a manila folder, clipboard, handset phone, calendar, envelope etc is. Not to mention that MOST of the remaining icons are still in use for the general public. A TV, photo, microphone, bookmark etc isn't forgotten to the general public yet. This seems to be another general "your problems/knowledge isn't relative to ME ME ME!".

    79. Re:Awesome! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      I recall the highly-tweaked VMS that we used back in the day had two nice features regarding files. File saving could be set up so that each version of the file was saved with a trailing semicolon and a version number, so you could go back to any of those versions. Of course modern version control is better. The other was a nice owner-group-project permissions system (Unix has a poor relative mechanism). As one moved between projects in the day one just did a 'change project' (rather like chgrp on Unix), and the access to the files would change. Also the system accounted for time and cpu etc. on that basis, so projects could be billed accordingly for one's own time and resource usage.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    80. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Rolling back could be a simple scrubber like videos use to allow you to "scroll back" in time on the video.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    81. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Templates can be handled without save. If a document is marked as a template (or heck, marked as read only) the editor wouldn't allow auto save and you'd be prompted (after opening the template) for a name for your new document. Any change thereafter goes to the new location.

      I've described rolling back in other comments, but I imagine your document history like a video. You could scrub back in time to a position and edit in time if you like.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    82. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      So it's a history mark instead of save.... seems like they are obfuscating for no other reason than "it's always been done this way" which I think falls in like with he story's point.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    83. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except it's hardly a CLI and just a built in search...

    84. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the boxes idea works, but I'd like to think it could be appropriately abstracted to the point where people could actually specify the directory as a "room", "toybox" or "toolbox" if they like. The user would have control over what the representation is by the icon selection. (Then the icon select could determine the layout of the directory. ie: I select a room to store my video shelf and each of those "types" has a different layout for the contents. It feels a little "Microsoft Bob" to me right now; you wouldn't have to go that route if you like the file cabinet/folder analogy, you could also go that route.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    85. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I think someone could argue that when someone opens a document they could still think of that document like a sheet of paper and pen. You don't have to save that sheet of paper you picked up. When you write on it, it's always going to be there even when you come back or you lose power. Computers could allow you to store a history of that paper and play back in time like a video history. I think we accept save/load because that's how we've always worked, but I don't know if it's any more intuitive to someone starting fresh on a computer. (Heck, I think everyone here had to be taught to save at one point. It may have been one time, but it was still taught.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    86. Re:Awesome! by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I don't understand why it isn't configuarable on a per-application basis with the menu items intact and the addition of an autosave toggle below save and save as.

      I agree.

      To the other point: Why couldn't you just open the document and "rewind" the document to the point you want to go back to? The "undo history" could be a part of the document.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    87. Re:Awesome! by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      True, modern radio buttons don't have the same tactile feel as old-fashioned ones do - but computer "radio buttons" have never had that tactile feel, so in that sense they're actually more like modern radio buttons than they were like old-fashioned ones. The analogy is getting more accurate, not less.

      And yes, I remember the partial-press phenomenon - but I always thought of that as a harmless "bug" due to the mechanical nature of the mechanism, not a "feature" to be emulated. Certainly computer "radio buttons" have never exhibited that sort of behavior.

    88. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I'm concerned Folders/Directories can just be squares containing other squares.

      Or, in a metaphor that works both in the real, physical world and on computers (as a reference to objects): A directory is an image of an open box with other boxes in it.

      Yeah, but the day we stop using boxes nobody will understand the icon any more.

    89. Re:Awesome! by lucm · · Score: 1

      Compared to the English language, these icons are stupidly up to date.

      Reminds me of that "Closed - Please call again" sign in the door of the bookstore where I don't go anymore because of my kindle

      --
      lucm, indeed.
    90. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So GNOME?

    91. Re:Awesome! by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      Just because the symbol BEHIND the icon doesn't mean anything to the younger generations does not mean the icon itself is bad.

      Precisely.

      Images, just like words, have meanings. Words are simply a symbolic representation of a mental image.

      Using the 'old' icons is beneficial for another reason, not disadvantageous. Older devices were much more unique than their current incarnations and have been readily identified as such, using iconography, for over 50 years in many cases:

      * radios denoted with a tower
      * TVs denoted by the 'empty face with ears' - this works for both high res screens as a silloette icon and printed material where there is only black on white.
      * pictures being denoted by polaroid images
      * saving files being associated with a floppy disk - you're going to change it to an SD icon, when most people don't even know what that means, or what?
      * microphones being denoted by the common 'cup with an egg' icon (microphones which are still around and in use, I might add, vs. a 'stick' or a 'bar' icon of something which might be a lightsaber or a dildo, or any number of other things? that's what people think of almost immediately when they think 'microphone', not a common modern stage mic.)
      * a folder is a folder (and yeah, we still use them even if we don't use them regularly - we know what they are and the symbolism works well due to the continued analogous functionality)

      These images all convey, within the context in which they are used

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    92. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      And despite all the insults posted above you, ya know what? For the vast majority it WORKS so why change? After playing with a customer's 12 inch netbook I decided THAT was what I needed, my 17 incher was too damned heavy, it was bulky, a PITA to balance on my lap and I was lucky to get 4 hours.

      So I went out and bought one of the EEE netbooks with the E350 chip and frankly I love it! I don't give a damn if the res is only 1366x768 the picture is clear and crisp, it can play HD movies for 6 hours or surf for 8 and I can squeeze another hour to an hour and a half by using the built in ExpressGate OS. Hell it even took 8Gb of RAM and the Radeon chip lets me play some L4D or GTA:VC when I'm stuck somewhere and bored. Its easy to carry, can be easily hidden under the seat of my truck, its just the perfect size!

      so all those snobs above you shitting on any non 1080P device as nothing but "poor people's crap" need to wake up and smell reality because thin and light and easy to carry is the way of the present not to mention the future and most folks like me would rather have excellent battery life than some huge ass screen, which is what desktops are for.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    93. Re:Awesome! by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Actually, most of us wait for our gnome/kde desktop to load so we can fire up a terminal window.

    94. Re:Awesome! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Instinctively saving (which I tend to do about every other sentence) without changing the name first has the same effect - I finally learned (after screwing up WAY too many times) to ALWAYS change the name FIRST ("save as..."), and THEN make the changes and save again. That usage pattern is now burned into my brain, to the point that I get nervous when I see someone else modifying a template without doing a "save as" first!

      Amen to that.

      If an autosave-and-undo scheme was the standard, there'd need to be a paradigm shift to having a "fork" button on the interface (not necessarily a picture of a fork). If it was that easy to open a new copy, we'd all get the hang of it pretty quickly. We'd also get in the habit of tagging our "major revisions" manually. In other words "all the stuff we call good document management now, but that the current system doesn't encourage us to do."

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    95. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Don't know if it is the same in 2K10 but in 2k7 it is pretty easy to make your own menu with the quick access toolbar and the track changes icon, while also supposedly being a document with a pen, actually looks like a check thanks to it being a smaller icon. personally i prefer having my own custom quick access as it is 1.-At the top of the screen thus Fitt's Law comes in to play, 2.-because it is static and in the order i chose quicker for me to hit the one i need and 3.-Gives me more real estate for the actual document.

      I hear you though, most of this new crap is just change for the sake of change instead of looking at how the user actually works and conforming to them. that's why after using Win 8 CP for nearly a month I'm sticking with Win 7 as I found the new UI to get in my damned way more often than it helped.

      its like this article, the icons in question are simple, consistent across applications, easy to read on pretty much any screen so...lets get rid of them! /Facepalm/..Who gives a rat's ass about whether or not the symbolism behind an icon works, as long as the icon itself serves its function? I'm shocked the guy didn't bitch about the power button while he was at it, after all how many read engineering specs? Doesn't change the fact that the icon itself is easy to read across multiple designs and is simple to implement...nahh we should replace it with Trollface! Is it just me or are the young ones getting dumber as we go along?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    96. Re:Awesome! by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about tags per se, but some sort of multiple categorisation would be good. My Documents, My Pictures, My Music and My Videos looks good until you realise that (eg) the script for your new blockbuster, the publicity shots, the soundtrack and the finished film are in different places. So we all end up falling back on My Documents....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    97. Re:Awesome! by gcerullo · · Score: 0

      He did not say an "illiterate person" he said a "computer illiterate" as in "illiterate" in the use of "computers." There is a big difference.

      The most intelligent person in the world can be "computer illiterate" if he's never used a computer in his life.

    98. Re:Awesome! by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why we have to "Save" documents in today's computer age.

      I don't understand why you (and UX 'experts') as so obsessed with removing 'Save'. If some of us like the paradigm, why not just leave it?

    99. Re:Awesome! by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Its popularity came from the sword, and its strength is its capacity to sow confusion. I don't know if it's the open source movement I'd compare it with...

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    100. Re:Awesome! by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      Completely disassociated from any technology? The >> means the technology known as the motor rotates to roll the technology known as the tape forward, etc.

    101. Re:Awesome! by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      You know, those aren't the only icons that nobody has any idea of the meaning anymore. Those 26 icons were also once created from real world metaphors, and nobody has any idea of their old meaning anymore:

      ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

      Those other 10 are the same stuff. Once they were created from real world metaphors:

      0123456789

      We should drop all those icons already. People can't understand icons that have no real world meaning, they make conversations harder.

    102. Re:Awesome! by Sique · · Score: 1

      No. > just means "forward" (for readers of the latin script, this is the natural direction of reading) and >> is "double forward" or "strong forward". No technology involved in the iconography, and you don't need any technological experience to understand it.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    103. Re:Awesome! by trevelyon · · Score: 1

      Ummm, am I the only one that doesn't like the idea of click mouse, keyboard entry, click mouse? Maybe it's just me but that is a huge waste of time over click, click, click OR type and . I prefer either pulldown menus or CLI to the hybrid that causes me to shift between them. And yes I know there are hotkeys but then why do I need the GUI at all? Unity and gnome3 interaction makes no sense to me on a conceptual level.

    104. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like...
      Start menu from Windows Vista or Windows 7
      Spotlight search on OS X and iOS
      Search on Android

      Very unique...

    105. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      so all those snobs above you shitting on any non 1080P device as nothing but "poor people's crap" need to wake up and smell reality because thin and light and easy to carry is the way of the present not to mention the future and most folks like me would rather have excellent battery life than some huge ass screen, which is what desktops are for.

      And if you look at the history of the computer industry since the 1950s, you'll find that the top sales have always been with the smallest machines. Yes, if you can get more capability (memory, pixels, disk space, cpu speed), people will go for it - but only if the resulting machine isn't any bigger. If you want to make bets on computer technology (i.e., are an "investor"), you've always put your money on the smallest machines. Right now, you're betting on tablets and smartphones, and looking for the next marketing terms for the even smaller machines that'll follow.

      Of course, now that pixel size is reaching the limit of the human eye's resolution, you're wondering how they can shrink it any farther without losing the information content that people want. Stay tuned, and we'll find out.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    106. Re:Awesome! by Nimey · · Score: 1

      If you want twm or ratpoison, you know where to find them.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    107. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Experts agree... the English language is fucked.

      Which, oddly enough, is partly why it is so successful. English is the 'open source' of languages. Anybody can 'edit' it, adding new terms, letting others fall out of usage. It adopts features from every other languages shamelessly, squeezing them in anyplace where they kinda make sense. It is an example of the 'bazaar' method of design. It will never be pure, never by clean, never be well-structured, but it will continue to muddle through.

      Some years ago, I read an interesting take on this by a French researcher. He explained why he publishes all his papers in English rather than in French, although French is his native language.

      His explanation was a more detailed version of the above quote. He commented that if he were to publish in French, he would be subject to the Académie française, which has full legal control over the French language. They could criticise his (mis)use of words and block publication or force recall of his papers.

      But, he observed, an important part of any scientific field of researchers is the need for the participants to work out precise terminology to describe what they are learning. If a word for a new concept is needed, they must find or invent a word, else they can't discuss the concept in the rigorous manner required by successful science. The Académie can (and does) block this process.

      But, he continued, the English language has no such legal authority. Researchers publishing in English can invent new terms, borrow them from another language, or propose a more precise definition of an existing word to be used within their field. In English, they can discuss terminology openly, and can agree among themselves on the precise definition of a word to be used within their field.

      His argument was that this process isn't optional; successful science requires it. If researchers don't have control over the precise definitions used in their specialty, they can't produce valid scientific publication. In French this is not allowed. In English, it is allowed, because there is no legal control over use of the language (except in the field of law itself, of course ;-). So he and his colleagues publish in English.

      The fact that it's the language with the most readers in the world (many of whom can't speak it well) is a further argument in English's favor. But the important fact about English is that there is no legal body in any English-using country with the power to control researcher's use of their own field's jargon. So, despite all its obvious faults, English is the preferred technical language nearly everywhere.

      Now if we could only get the English-using media to stop garbling the meanings of technical terms ...

      (But that would probably require some sort of official Académie Anglaise, so we're probably better off with all the corruption of our technical terms by the ignorant. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    108. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      ... and I see that the link in that message doesn't work from the /. page. Here's the link copied from a browser window where it worked: "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acad%C3%A9mie_fran%C3%A7aise". Funny thing is that it displays correctly in my firefox window, but comes out here with the UTF-8 values in hex. Let's see if it works ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    109. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You know, those aren't the only icons that nobody has any idea of the meaning anymore. Those 26 icons were also once created from real world metaphors, and nobody has any idea of their old meaning anymore: ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ

      Heh. You're quite wrong about that. Try asking google about "Latin alphabet" (or "English alphabet" if you want to do one more click), and a bit of clicking on the obvious links to predecessor languages will quickly track down the origins of most of those icons (actually glyphs). Some of them such as J and W, were invented as modifications of the Latin letters for languages that had more sounds. But most have an origin in Phoenician writing, augmented by letters from a few other languages.

      Thus, the 'A' started life as a Phoenician letter rotated maybe 140 degrees counter-clockwise, in which form you can see the face and two horns of the bull ('alif in most Semitic languages) that it represented. The letter actually referred to the glottal stop, which is treated as a separate consonant in the Semitic languages, but the Greeks reinterpreted it to mean the first vowel sound in the word.

      Similarly, the history of each of our letters is quite well known. Most of them did start off as a pictograph, but many centuries of borrowing and fancy writing by scribes modified them so they hardly resemble the original icons. Sometimes the history is a bit weird. For example, Phoenician had a letter that looks much like our W, but they are unrelated. The Phoenician w represented a "sh" sound, and was the ancestor of the similar letters inthe Hebrew and Cyrillic alphabets. But the English W originated as "VV", which was used centuries ago because Latin didn't have the needed letter. Eventually the two Vs were run together, to make our modern W (which we call "double U" due to another rather silly historic misunderstanding).

      Anyway, if you were to say that the original meanings of the English letters is unknown to nearly all modern people, you'd be quite correct. But saying that nobody knows this information is quite wrong. You can even find it in wikipedia, if you care to dig a bit. But it's not very useful information, so you should only go looking for it if you find the topic interesting.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    110. Re:Awesome! by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Actually, the tape recorder icons were not that understandable. They only made sense to you because you use a left-to-right language, so to you, a left arrow means "backwards", and a right arrow means "forwards". This is going to seem entirely backwards to someone who natively uses a right-to-left language. The other icons weren't all that intuitive either; their main advantage was extreme simplicity. Once someone learned what they meant (which doesn't take long with ~6 icons), they'd remember them forevermore.

    111. Re:Awesome! by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 1

      de-associate icons with tech and the problem of being out of date goes out of date

      I don't think the icons being out of date is even a problem. Even Slashdot uses an antique phonograph with a horn icon to indicate music stories. It's doubtful that any one posting on Slashdot was even born when that tech was common, but everyone recognizes what it means. The important thing is that people associate that image with a particular function. Is anybody actually complaining about not being able to recognize the symbolism of current common icon sets?

    112. Re:Awesome! by Bacon+Bits · · Score: 1

      Every time you have to take your hand off the keyboard to grab the mouse or flick the trackpad, you lose time.

      Every time you take your hand off the mouse or trackpad and line it up on the keyboard again, you lose time.

      The idiot who came up with the idea of requiring both mouse and keyboard input for one UI metaphor was a complete and utter freakin' MORON with absolutely NO UI design experience worth noting.

      Perhaps I'm just hyper-evolved, but I was born with two hands. Typically then, I use the mouse with one hand to designate what I want the computer to operate on, and then the other hand to specify the command I want the computer to run. The only time I need to deviate from this is when I'm producing a lot of text-based content, which typically requires enough time that moving my hand from the mouse to the keyboard is not an appreciable loss of time.

      The only time when the keyboard / mouse interface breaks down is when you need to use the mouse to designate something, then type a short word longer than a few letters, then designate something else. If you've ever watched someone log in to a computer or enter their personal information on a website who doesn't know that the [tab] key advances fields, [enter] submits the current window, and [esc] cancels it, you see how painfully tedious it is. The only thing worse than watching someone fill out a form who doesn't know these key commands is being forced to fill out a form in a program or on a website where the developer didn't understand the importance of this convention and did not implement it correctly (or at all).

      --
      The road to tyranny has always been paved with claims of necessity.
    113. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that the point of the Ribbon(TM)?

    114. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      what about just basic shapes, like a filled circle for save, a filled square for copy, an open square for paste, etc.

      Or we could just replace them by the Chinese characters for the concepts. Then, in a short time, over half of humanity would have a common icon for all the concepts. I'm sure we could ask the Chinese manufacturers what icons they use.

      (Of course, the "NIH Syndrome" does come into effect here. Nobody really expects the world to agree on a common set of icons, even in cases where we already have an icon for a concept that's shared by over 1/4 of our species. We haven't even got the entire world to agree on what a stop sign looks like. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    115. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      porn?

    116. Re:Awesome! by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      There's still some benefits to going far further than the human eye's resolution - vector UIs have implementation issues. So, a 3840x2400 15.6" display isn't THAT useful, but it can raster scale 1920x1200 and 1280x800, both usable display areas, on the same panel.

      Take that to 7680x4800, and you can get 1280x800, 1536x960, 1920x1200, and 2560x1600, all on the same panel, perfectly scaled. All of those are useful densities.

    117. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Engish is dead, Netcraft confirms it.

      [Spelling mistake intentional]

    118. Re:Awesome! by Godot143 · · Score: 1

      What exactly does an illiterate person do with a PC?

      Surf Porn, just like the rest of us.

    119. Re:Awesome! by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too late; Microsoft already hired him for Ribbon and Metro UI design.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    120. Re:Awesome! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      So, an OS X Help menu then? (If you type something into the help search box, it shows you matching menu items from the other menus).

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    121. Re:Awesome! by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I am confused. From your own link:

      The Académie is France's official authority on the usages, vocabulary, and grammar of the French language, although its recommendations carry no legal power — sometimes, even governmental authorities disregard the Académie's rulings.

      Basically you just tanked your own statement by providing a source.

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    122. Re:Awesome! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Forking documents. Auto-save is not understood by many simple users. And I don't know about you, but I often do not want things "saved"

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    123. Re:Awesome! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      And that is why Apple products are consumer devices *ducks for cover*

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    124. Re:Awesome! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      My wife doesn't understand why an "orange helicopter" sometimes appears on her dashboard, but she now knows to tell me about it if she ever sees it again.

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    125. Re:Awesome! by Mateorabi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The reason the current icons are good is that they are now unambiguous in their meaning, being up to date with current culture/tech has no bearing on this. The dated-ness of them actually helps, since they come from an age of unitaskers. They are good simply because each icon can only have one possible, reasonable interpretation.* If you were to try and make them modern, in our age of multitaskers, you'd get generic meaningless icons.

      *ok, clipboard for paste, but not copy is a little ambiguous, but always appears near the less ambiguous paper doppelganger for "copy."

      --
      "You saved 1968." - Ms. Valerie Pringle to the crew of Apollo 8

    126. Re:Awesome! by RedWizzard · · Score: 1

      Because 98% of panel production is for HDTVs these days, the smaller ones of which are..... 1366x768. Manufacturers are just taking advantage of volume production to keep costs down.

      I don't buy that theory. What's the volume on 15" and 17" HD TVs? Not that large I think. I think the issue is that too many consumers think HD is the gold standard so there is little point in producing anything high res than 1080p. Perhaps the iPad will change that perception though.

    127. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      aren't we talking about glyphs/icons? radio buttons don't look like anything to do with a radio. you also managed to completely avoid the question of how they relate to smartphones

      the functionality similarity makes sense though, so your point is appreciated, but there's no reading and weeping here. sorry to disappoint

    128. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      its funny watching some people use a microsoft access application and get really confused when they can't find the save button (even though there is one). i usually get asked to put a save button on forms even though its not required.

    129. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      you have a helicopter mode in your car and she accidentally activated it!?

      is that you, 007?

    130. Re:Awesome! by BonzaiThePenguin · · Score: 1

      Sounds more like you despise the fact that the app doesn't have undo/redo support or auto-versioning.

    131. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      Is anybody actually complaining about not being able to recognize the symbolism of current common icon sets?

      you must be new here

    132. Re:Awesome! by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i've never seen a radio with station buttons that look like gui radio buttons. it seems like association by a stretch to me, but if anything it highlights why icons should perhaps be disassociated with technology.

      why didn't they call them cassette buttons instead? cassette players of old had buttons with similar functionality.

      but yeah i was just trolling. what the hell else do people do on slashdot? what was the purpose of your post? of course you weren't trolling so i'm curious to read what sort of other bullshit excuse you have for posting on this site

    133. Re:Awesome! by jaymemaurice · · Score: 1

      Pfft 007 isn't stupid enough to get married. Your car might have it too - ask your wife what she thinks it is.
      It looks like this...

      --
      120 characters ought to be enough for anyone
    134. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's no reason not to use vectorized graphics in this day and age, yes, even for icons. You could scale them to fit any desktop size. You can even zoom in and out. Especially if you put the same icons at the same places in every program, you are going to benefit from a stable GUI experience.

      Stray away from the known knowns in GUI at your user's expense..

    135. Re:Awesome! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Kudos for making fun of something really stupid. Maybe the younger generation has never seen a floppy (my youngest daughter's only 26 and we used floppies until she was a teenager), but they've always seen that icon meaning "save".

      As to the other things, most are still around. My car radio has buttons, doesn't yours? I still see people with physical clipbpoards and (gasp) paper. Bookmarks? If you've never seen a real book made of real paper what planet are you from? Calendars? Still in use, both paper and electronic. Address books? Well, that is what the thing you look someone up in your phone is still called, right? Even though it's now part of the phone and not a separate booklet?

      Voice mail? Of course that's still around. WTF? It's not like they're using a picture of a tape-driven answering machine for an icon.

      Dumb dumb dumb. Idiotic dumb. Brain dead dumb. Stupid fucking kids! Dumb.

    136. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've left Ubuntu for Mint, and will never return until a) that god-forsaken sidebar on the left stops popping up whenever I try to click on the 'back' button of Firefox (which is conveniently automatically maximized no matter what I actually want, so the back button is by default 'behind' the stupid sidebar), and Unity as a whole. Sorry, I've got several windows open. To click on 'edit', I don't want to drag my mouse off of the program I'm using way the hell to the top left every 5 seconds if I'm doing a lot of editing. Unity is about the most irritating, non-intuitive scheme I've ever encountered. Why in gods name would they think that no matter where your program window is located, you would want the 'file' menu at the absolute top-left of the monitor?!?

    137. Re:Awesome! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      One thing to remember about the HUD is that it's optional. It's essentially a search facility for drop down menu items, but the drop down menus are still there.

      I've found it useful for hunting for the odd obscure menu item that I'm not familiar with, but I don't use it a lot; mostly I stick with the GUI menus. Helpfully, the search results in the HUD also contain the full list of where the item was in the drop down menus, meaning it's a useful learning tool for finding menu items for later.

    138. Re:Awesome! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      It's nothing like the Start Menu in Windows, or the rest- that would be the Unity Dash. The HUD is a way of searching for specific menu items in active programmes- which I'm not aware of a way of doing that in Windows or Android.

      (Not that I've got anything against copying features- either Linux copying other OSs, or other OSs copying Linux. Someone has to have a good idea first, and I don't see why other people shouldn't pick up a good idea when they see one. To intentionally ignore a good idea just because someone thought of it before you would be to cut off your nose to spite your face.)

    139. Re:Awesome! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      In that case, this should be a hugely good thing for you. The HUD is optional- the clicky-mouse menus are still there, exactly as they've always been.

      This means that if you're using your mouse and you need a menu item, you can select them without taking your hand off your mouse (i.e., as normal). But if you're typing away with your hands on the keyboard, you can select menu items without taking your hands off the keyboard (which has never been easy before now- mucking around with the "menu" key and tabbing, or whatever you need to do).

    140. Re:Awesome! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Maybe- I've never heard of that feature before.

      I'm not claiming that Unity did it first or that it's unique, by the way. I was just saying that the new feature for menu items (which is the topic in hand) in Unity is pretty decent, in response to someone blaming Unity for bad menus. I've nothing against Ubuntu stealing Apple's good ideas (or vice versa)- a good idea is a good idea, and you'd have to be stupid not to use a good idea when you see one (patents and other nonsense aside). Don't forget that the whole desktop paradigm was a good idea by Xerox- if other companies hadn't recognised that good idea when they saw it, we wouldn't have had Mac, Windows, KDE, GNOME, Acorn RISCOS, OS2, Amiga...

    141. Re:Awesome! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I guess I'm the exception then, the only time I'm at a terminal is if I forget the root password.

    142. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, an icon of a safe might be sensible. It not only implies a place you put things you want to keep, but it even sounds similar.

    143. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with you 100%. Icons are really symbols that represent an action or specific feature and as long people know what they represent then they are ok. The floppy icon is so universal that it's taken on a more fundamental meaning than what it visually represents. Just as the written language evolved from pictographs to more abstract symbols, icons may someday become more abstract and less detailed.

    144. Re:Awesome! by tkalfigo · · Score: 1

      What really bedazzles me is how one could possibly write such a long and imaginative post on /. and still be the first poster! Been preparing for years for this to happen, haven't you? Admit it...

    145. Re:Awesome! by xkpe · · Score: 1

      Learn to read?

    146. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it wasn't my statement that may have been "tanked"; it was the explanation of the French researcher (whose name I've long since forgotten). He claimed that, in fact, the Académie can and does interfere with technical groups like his developing their own "jargon" that violates the Académie's rules for the French language.

      It's possible that the mechanism at work is management accepting complaints from the Académie and imposing the restrictions on groups attempting to develop their own technical jargon. I don't actually know, not being a French citizen (and never having the gall to attempt publishing anything in French myself ;-).

      I have heard/read a number of other comments about official harrassment over violations of the rules for the French language. Whatever is going on seems to be a lot more serious than the problems in the English-speaking world with the gang of "prescriptivists" constantly peeving about violations of the supposed rules of English grammar or spelling. In English, we mostly just laugh at such things. We can also read comments from linguists about how wrong the prescriptivist gang usually is, and laugh more. But at least this one researcher claimed that the interference in French is a lot more serious, enough so to justify becoming fluent in another language for publication purposes.

      Actually, it might be interesting to investigate this some more. Maybe I'll try asking about it on a couple of linguistic forums. There are a number of major languages with an official arbiter for correct speech/writing. It could be an interesting linguistics project to document the relative effectiveness of this in different languages.

      But in English, we have the opposite problem. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    147. Re:Awesome! by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Of course, nobody means 'nobody' when saying "nobody". Everybody means 'very few' when saying "nobody". But I guess you probably knew ;)

    148. Re:Awesome! by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Everybody knows: time to vacuum your car!

    149. Re:Awesome! by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, as jimshatt already said, I was aware that exist people that know the origin of those icons. That "nobody" was hyperbole.

      Anyway, that's a quite informative post. Thank you.

    150. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In re: "(But that would probably require some sort of official Académie Anglaise, so we're probably better off with all the corruption of our technical terms by the ignorant. ;-)"

      Actually, just an académie du journalisme, with severe financial penalties to the publication (I know, let's make 'em put up a sum in escrow to publish each article, which any misquoted source can claim if they can prove that they've been misquoted or mis-inferred).

    151. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but my radio let me press 2 at a time. got some odd stations like that. come to think of it, maybe it was just broken and not a feature per se.

    152. Re:Awesome! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      I know that there are pieces of equipment around my house that have physical buttons that pop in and out according to which one is set but I can't think what they are offhand.

      Possibly your blender. So they're now blender buttons. Just don't think about what happens to your data when you press them...

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    153. Re:Awesome! by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      I think they're still in the "make it work" stage, meaning that they haven't gotten around to "make it work fast" yet.

      Of course, good design would probably have made it work quickly enough from the start.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    154. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sir, this note is to inform you that you have incorrectly used non-English words in an English work. The correct term for our organization is "English Academy". Please correct your incorrect usage of our name or else choose another language for its publication. Please comply within 5 business days.

    155. Re:Awesome! by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      But one of the benefits posited by GUI designers is the intuitive interface. If the icons have no inherent indication of their purpose, then it is no longer intuitive, even if the knowledge is transferable. Note that File, Save still makes sense so long as you're saving files.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    156. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, sorta like how most people mean "figuratively" when they say "literally". ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    157. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the Unity HUD thing is pretty nifty (the HUD, not the Dash- which is still not nifty). You hit Alt and you get a small text entry box. You type, and it returns every menu item in the programme you're using that matches the words. Surprisingly useful way of not having to deal with the drop-down menus.

      Gee, sounds like Spotlight, which showed up in Mac OS X 10.4 in 2005, but with a HUD UI.

    158. Re:Awesome! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      The idiot who came up with the idea of requiring both mouse and keyboard input for one UI metaphor was a complete and utter freakin' MORON with absolutely NO UI design experience worth noting.

      So then I guess Douglas Englebart, the inventor of the mouse, (or his team) is an "utter freakin' MORON" according to you.

      If you watch the famous video ("mother of all demos"(*)), you will see that he uses the keyboard and mouse simultaneously.

      Also, in more modern days, using shift or command to change selection of things you click on, or do different metaphors in the Finder (e.g. copy, move, make alias) while dragging, are also instances of useful uses of the keyboard and mouse simultaneously.

      (*) Most relevant link I saw mentioned in the Wikipedia article: http://sloan.stanford.edu/MouseSite/1968Demo.html

    159. Re:Awesome! by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      You don't "need" the GUI at all, apparently.

      The GUI is there to make it easier, and have the options available to you at any point in time (i.e. when you pull down the menus).

      The hotkeys are there (remember, Mac OS didn't have menu keyboard equivalents at first) so that after you're used to doing something a lot, you don't have to look at the menus, and can do it faster via the keyboard IF YOU WANT TO.

      BTW, you don't NEED to use the mouse to navigate the menus (or most any other GUI element) either. In fact, I think Windows did this a lot earlier than Mac OS. I keyboard navigate the menubar and Dock on Mac OS X a huge portion of the times I use either.

    160. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice history, and nice misinterpretation of the metaphorical word 'nobody'. To find the original meaning of a floppy disk icon or a pair of binoculars is significantly closer to the modern time than the Phoenecian alphabet.

    161. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your source is wrong and a quick fact checking session would have revealed to you that the académie is in no way a legal body, only a club for old geezers which produces a dictionary once per century. Ok, a bit more than that and of great quality, I must admit.
      French is used far less than english ? It doesn't have anything to do with an imaginary dictator forcing everybody to speak 'le bon français' but everything to do with another kind of dictator : the target audience !
      Yes, french speaking audience is scarse (comparatively), so the researcher you talked about wrote his articles in English, and to cover this fact (shame ?) he decided to pretend he was fighting against something imaginary.

      To be totally honest, we're really good at that over here.

      I mean fighting against imaginary stuff... Research ? Not so much.

      Source :
      http://www.academie-francaise.fr/role/index.html
      Wikipedia
      Yourself !

    162. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An Academie Anglaise would be a great thing for precisely that reason (ie to stop the media from garbling). As long as it isn't as rigorous as the Academie Francais it would probably work. I have a vague recollection of the Academie Francais being set up by Charles De Gaul to stop English terms from entering French after the War (this recollection is based on an article I read back in 1982, so the article might be incorrect as it was a 'fluff piece' - basically complaining about the French removing the English, but the English adopting terms like 'cord-on-bleu' etc). It listed things like 'Le Jazz Hot' (no idea what that means - 'Hot Jazz Music' would be my guess, but it might have just meant something was 'good') as something they were getting rid of. Just wonder if some of those terms might have come back into English.

    163. Re:Awesome! by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I've been modded "Flamebait" quite a few times.
      In all honesty, my intention was to make a funny remark, because of an old joke where Jesus and the Underlord entered a programming ocompetition where power went out in the end and Jesus won because "Jesus Saves".
      Sorry if i offended anyone. A joke is a joke, nothing more, and whoever sees something else might lack sense of humor.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    164. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't suppose you did a write-up of how you did that?

    165. Re:Awesome! by jc42 · · Score: 1

      He does have a narrow point - old radios had buttons that physically pushed in, and only one could be in at a time. A rather complicated mechanical linkage accomplished this

      Others have mentioned blenders and cassette players as gadgets that have had (and often still do have) such mechanical buttons.

      I have an accordion with a similar set of 7 buttons that select subsets of the 3 sets of reeds behind the keyboard. As with the others, if push one button, the button that was previously down pops up. I've taken the plate off and looked at the mechanical linkage that implements this, and I wouldn't call it "rather complicated". I found it instantly understandable, and actually a bit trivial. I'd imagine that the linkages inside a lot of these other gadgets are also fairly simple. If you have a friend with an accordion, you might ask to see how it works. Usually all you have to do is turn a couple of thumbscrews to remove the cover.

      But we probably don't want to suggest "accordion button". That would confuse the people who know that "accordion" refers to the bellows, and computers rarely have bellows. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    166. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You haven't trained yourself to use a one handed chording keyboard yet?

    167. Re:Awesome! by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      No, I just paid the $5 subscription fee 10 year ago, but never turned off ads, so it never expired, and I get the 5-minute premonition perk.

    168. Re:Awesome! by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Sorry friend but you are forgetting something...dorm rooms. talking to my oldest he said the dorm rooms are FILLED with those "baby TVs" because they are small enough they can plug in some headphones and not disturb their roomie.

      so i wouldn't be so quick to dismiss the college and youth market. Most of my oldest boy's college buddies are all watching on those dorm TVs and were more than a little jealous that he and his brother have 22 inch 1600x900 monitors they use for TVs, but in those little campus dorms space is a premium and the smaller sets are an easier 'fit". although some are taking my advice and buying USB dongles for HDTV so they can just use their laptops instead.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    169. Re:Awesome! by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I don't really mean to be championing Unity- I dumped it for XFCE on my main machines, and have only kept it on my small-screen netbook- but it isn't all bad.

      The taskbar on the left can now be set to only pop up when you whack your cursor into the side of the screen with some force. It has completely stopped the irritating "pop up every time I try to click anything on the left of the screen" syndrome, which nearly made me ditch it from my last machine.

      Automatic maximisation- it does that whenever a window tries to open at more than 75% of screen size. This is a setting that can be changed in the conventional way.

      The window menu being at the top edge is still irritating on a big screen, but it's no hardship on 9".

      If unity is the most irritating, least intuitive scheme you've ever tried, I recommend steering clear of Gnome3 :)

    170. Re:Awesome! by Sigg3.net · · Score: 1

      Just hopped from Debian to #! Linux on my laptop. Crunchbang uses Openbox, which is a delight:)

    171. Re:Awesome! by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      The advantage to icons over words is that they are language and dialect independent.

      Updating the floppy disk icon to an SD card just means we'll have another 'useless' icon in another few years when everything is in the 'cloud', or whatever buzz word we're using by then.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    172. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? They post on facebook, Craig's list, write e-mails for Nigerian Princes, and dominate about 90% of internet traffic.

    173. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing as you, hope the p0rn they click doesn't diverge too far from the preview in the "wrong" direction, if you catch my drift.

    174. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can only use one hand for both the mouse and keyboard because.....

      Never mind, you lost your other hand in an gardening accident, and yes I am an insensitive clod.

    175. Re:Awesome! by JonySuede · · Score: 1

      masturbate

      --
      Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    176. Re:Awesome! by TrekkieGod · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why we have to "Save" documents in today's computer age. What's wrong with Auto-save and Undo? Undo is a simply red arrow pointing counter clockwise. Redo is green and clockwise.

      You must be the guy who has been ruining OS X for me.

      Autosave is a great feature for recovery purposes. If the computer crashes, when I reopen the program it should detect that I was working on something and ask me if I want to recover it. It should not autosave to the actual file I intend to open unless I tell it to.

      While I'm ranting about stupid Mac OS X decisions, when I open a program that was closed normally, it should open in a default state, not with whatever I had opened before. It's highly unlikely I'll want to open the same file. In fact, if I open a program directly, I'm likely to want to create a new file. if I want to open a file, I would have clicked on the file, and let the default program open.

      Finally, when I choose to quit a program, it should actually quit, not stay open in the background. If I want it to stay open in the background, I'll minimize it.

      --

      Warning: Opinions known to be heavily biased.

  2. Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Increasing the number of symbols and words coming into usage and those going into obsolescence.

    When watching 'TV' do teenagers still say 'turn' the 'channel'?

    1. Re:Technology by PhunkySchtuff · · Score: 1

      No, they say change the channel

    2. Re:Technology by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 1

      Growing up (born in '80), we had a cable controller box on a cord that reached to the couch, and it was controlled by toggle buttons (I want to say A, B, and C columns, and then you would select one of twenty channels in the appropriate column, for a total of sixty).

      So that was my really verbose way of saying that even though I am old, "turn the channel" never entered my vocabulary.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    3. Re:Technology by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      I think I still have a VCR in the basement that has a remote control with a 20' wire on it instead of using IR.

    4. Re:Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      32 is OLD now? I though 50 was the new 40.

    5. Re:Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TV? Teenagers stream or download stuff from the internet.

    6. Re:Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My father had a remote when I was growing up: me.

      The tuner on the Crosley was a cylinder with parallel rows of contacts; every ten years or so, one yanked it out and cleaned the contacts with a standard school rubber eraser. The set was bought in '55 and only retired in '79 in favor of a color one. Towards the end it could get interesting replacing a tube, most drugstores no longer had a tube tester and spares. :)

    7. Re:Technology by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      My father had a remote when I was growing up: me

      Lol !

      And I thought I was the only one who played that "remote" character

      The only difference between you and me is I am the only remote for my whole family

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    8. Re:Technology by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I've got an old ultrasonic TV remote. No TV to go with it any more.

    9. Re:Technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where have you been? 12 is old now.

    10. Re:Technology by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      2 is the new 12.

    11. Re:Technology by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      My father had a remote when I was growing up: me.

      My mother's told me the same thing many times, although it can't have been too bad, what with 4 channels to choose from and all.

    12. Re:Technology by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2

      Humans are just like electronics. A 50 year-old man is a lot less likely to break than one twenty years younger, just like NESes are much more reliable than 360s or PS3s.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    13. Re:Technology by crutchy · · Score: 1

      When watching 'TV' do teenagers still say 'turn' the 'channel'?

      can't vouch for teenagers, but my preteen youngsters just just say "daddy, that's not cartoons"

    14. Re:Technology by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      And the 5 buttons on the right side of the controller (with their corresponding red lights) for playing that game show that was on for about a month. I miss the old WarnerAmex controllers. Cord or no cord. It was easier. /I'll get off my own lawn now.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    15. Re:Technology by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Because in the past it was very difficult to design a device so that it fails a month after the warranty expires, but no device breaks before the warranty expires. So the designers chose the safer way to do it and built devices that can last a very long time.

      Now everybody is trying to save the last penny, devices do not last as long and they are almost impossible to repair (unlike the old ones).

    16. Re:Technology by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 2

      We didn't need a remote. There was only the one channel.

    17. Re:Technology by Pikoro · · Score: 1

      Wow, Used to have one of those myself. If you dropped your keys the damned thing turned through the channels in "man" mode :)

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    18. Re:Technology by reboot246 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm 59 and I say 'change the channel', but everybody says 'dial the phone' when we haven't had phones with rotary dials in years. And we still say 'roll up the window' even though our cars have power windows.

      Icons are like speech in that respect. They have become part of the language. Changing them willy-nilly only confuses people.

    19. Re:Technology by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      My family had a couple of those when I was growing up - often, the channel would change when someone sneezed.

    20. Re:Technology by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I am jussssst old enough to remember my cousin and I sitting in frustration as we watched the little red "power on" light on her NES flash repeatedly. We'd see Super Mario and Duck Hunt on the screen for about half a second before the light would go off, the game would reset, and it would start over. Had the NES come along later, it would have been called the Red Light of Death. And we would have been called female gamers and it would have been a status symbol. Anyway, the only way for non-soldering children to get this fixed was to send the unit to Nintendo headquarters and wait for it to come back fixed. So maybe it's not more reliable than current consoles. But at least they actually would fix it and send it back. I personally think my Atari 2600 and TurboGrafx16 were the most solid/reliable consoles I ever had.

    21. Re:Technology by DamienNightbane · · Score: 0

      That's not how the NES works. Just blow in the slot/cartridge, and if that doesn't work smack the NES until it works properly.

    22. Re:Technology by Junta · · Score: 2

      Hey, my car still has hand crank windows.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    23. Re:Technology by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      Heh... We were being fucked over by DRM long before we knew what DRM was.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/10NES

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    24. Re:Technology by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

      When you're cruising the strip and a girl yells at you from the passenger side, it's a bitch to have to reach over and roll down the window, isn't it?

      Ah memories...

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    25. Re:Technology by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      I was just talking with someone whose two-year-old knows how to get into her iPhone and play games on it. Pretty much self-taught. Occasionally calls random numbers in France, which isn't so good.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    26. Re:Technology by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Related example - old Harley Davidsons leaked oil all the time but would last essentially forever, requiring maintenance the whole time. My 1982 Honda 900 Custom never leaked oil, required minimal maintenance and everything fell apart at the same time at 100,000 miles. Engineering can do that. In the extreme, the folks who build race cars and race boats etc. keep taking weight out of a part until it breaks, then add a bit more weight back in. It only has to last long enough to finish the race - everything else is a waste. I personally prefer some maintenance and a vehicle that could last long enough to justify the amortized environmental cost of the resources.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    27. Re:Technology by ekgringo · · Score: 1

      I had a roommate with one of those TVs but had lost the remote. We would rattle our keys to get it to change channels or turn on and off. When you were lucky, it managed to perform the function you actually intended.

    28. Re:Technology by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Number of channels to choose from was not the point. The point was that when Dad was in the living room reading the paper, listening/watching the TV, when he wanted the channel changed, I was the default remote. It was a simple matter: I'd been going to school and playing; he'd been working to earn the money to pay the bills and buy the freaking TV. RHIP.

  3. Drop the confusing pictures by korpique · · Score: 0

    Text all the way.

    Most of those images were invented only because it was expected at the time to have a picture for every action, which was kikd of stupid in first place.

    --
    I was the real korpiq until I woke up clowned.
    1. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Osgeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      not when your screen resolution at best was 640x480, and you had dozens of actions on the toolbar

    2. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Hognoxious · · Score: 2

      Very stupid. It's similar to how knights in the middle ages didn't wear specific colours and emblems on their shields and jackets, no not at all, but rather had their names written on them in itty bitty letters.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Extremus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Icons are originally designed to resemble what they mean; making it easier to recognize and remember what they mean. Besides, icons (and pictures in general) can code much more information in a small space; this is a reflection of our incredible abilities to recognize shapes, colours and textures. On the other hand, text don't allow such mechanisms: words have the same overall shape and their meaning is heavily based on conventions. For instance, some people know how to justify text in Word, but they have no clue that the word for that is "justify". Finally, some icons end up becoming sort of general symbols, where the meaning is defined by convention (this very article talk about this). In this case, they are still more useful then text because, as I said, encoding meaning in visual features is generally more efficient then using words.

    4. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Since they were all illiterate, I am fairly sure that would not have worked. Even the pubs had signs because the customers were too pissed to read.

      In any case, with only two knights to chose from, or three pubs in the village, the signs did not need to differ much. Computers can (mostly) do more than two or three things, or they could if I could recognise more than two or three of the icons.

      Since 1492, most people who can afford a computer, have also learned to read, and drop down text menus work pretty well.

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    5. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed. In a split second I can recognize text in a wide variety of fonts. Don't make me take an extra second to think about what your specific icon does -- or far, far, worse, make me take an extra four seconds to hover the mouse over it for a tool tip because you wanted to get super creative with the icons.

      First it was Microsoft and replacing text menus for the ribbon, now Google and replacing text on Gmail buttons with icons. There's a war on usability and its instigators are UI designers.

    6. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      Modern programmes seem to be going the opposite direction. MS Office and Chrome, I'm thinking of you.

      Have you had the pleasure of trying to advise a friend or colleague how to do something in one of these programmes? Where once you would have said "click tools, then options, then the general tab...", now we're reduced to such nonsense as "click on the logo orb", and "can you see the circle with what looks like a wrench and a cog in it?".

    7. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      When trying to kill someone with a bow and arrow, it's slightly more pressing that you're able to identify someone quickly and at a great distance. Unless you're trying to kill your office suite with a bow and arrow from 50 feet, the same logic probably doesn't apply (although to be fair, if you're using MS Office 2010 this may actually be a valid use case).

    8. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whether you are conscious of it or not, your brain is wired so it can recognize a pattern, silhouette, or specific color or movement much faster than it can input, decipher, and act on a string of text. This is a remnant of our wilderness instincts where we needed to be able to identify friend, foe, prey or predator in a split second and our lives depended on our reaction time.

      If you really don't know what these icons mean, it doesn't matter. People who have never seen the object before will just associate it with its action, whatever that may be. If they need to know the etymology of an icon, they can ask an 'old person' or Google it.

      Often your brain doesn't do any more thinking about the action than "click blue and orange swirly thing icon over there". You probably also know that when I said "Blue and orange swirly thing icon" i meant the Firefox logo. If you have seen this icon as much as any reasonable tech head would, your brain has it imprinted and you recognize it at a single glance - even if you don't search the icon for details of what it does(which is apparently encircle a blue marble in an immolated fox of questionable aliveness).

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    9. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by ifiwereasculptor · · Score: 2

      Well, icons had a purpose. Not only screen real estate was way costlier back then (320x240 displays were the norm for Windows 3.1), but in the beginning, a novice user didn't know what the hell "saving" a file was. It still hadn't entered the common vernacular as it has today, so "save" and "save as" were actually harder to understand than a picture of a floppy ("oh, right, so that's where I click to store my work, then").

      I agree that they aren't really necessary nowadays, though. Nor preferable. The most recent (and one of the worst) offender is Gmail. Really, trading a lot of easy to read text for disappearing, context-sensitive, monochromatic, hard to differentiate icons? Then they take the extra space it freed and leave it completely blank! Why? Why would you do that? It makes no sense at all unless Google found a way to exploit the angrily-shaking-fist-at-monitor market.

    10. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Not sure how anyone learns to read. How rediculous that we still have to memorise those 26 meaningless glyphs? - It's just not intuitive!

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by popo · · Score: 1

      Yes, icons were originally designed to represent objects, but ultimately the shapes just convey meaning -- whether that meaning is recognized or learned. We have loads of shapes in our common lexicon that people "just understand" without knowing why.

      For example: How many people know that the common ampersand is the French word "et"?

      Most don't. But they understand the meaning because they have been taught to associate the shape with the function.

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    12. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Capt.+Skinny · · Score: 2

      Text is a visual pattern that we recognize just like an icon. When we read "Save" or "Format" from a menu, we're not processing and deciphering that text. We recognize the word just as instantaneously as we recognize a stop sign. Within limits, different fonts and colors do nothing to impede our recognition because we're only working with 26 basic building blocks (letters). Once we "learn" a new word -- that is, once the word becomes visual symbol in our minds rather than a string of letters to be interpreted -- we instantly recognize it in any application that displays it in a menu.

      Icons, however, are not made up of universal building blocks. They do not become instantaneously recognizable symbols until we learn them. Sure, we all recognize the universal Save disk or Paste clipboard that most every application uses. But what about Archive? Merge? Format? Uncomment? Outside of a few universal icons, every app is different, and until we learn that app's symbology we're wasting time interpreting (or worse, looking up) the icons. For. Every. Single. App. We. Use.

      So why use icons at all? They save space, save time (fewer mouse clicks), and CAN be easily recognizable -- but only if we take the time to learn them. I don't want to bother when I already recognize a symbol for the same thing -- a one-word description of the task.

      Symbols made up of 26 basic building blocks which I already recognize, and which can be unambiguously interpreted when I don't recognize the symbol as a whole? Win.
      Symbols made up of arbitrary lines, curves and colors that I need to learn for each app? Epic fail.

    13. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i'm just thankful i'm not chinese or japanese. i'll take learning 26 glyphs over kanji anyday.

    14. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by crutchy · · Score: 1

      i'm pretty sure you would be violating the eula

    15. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by realityimpaired · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Symbols made up of 26 basic building blocks which I already recognize, and which can be unambiguously interpreted when I don't recognize the symbol as a whole?

      That's nice... now try porting your software to a language other than English, where the word for "save" may be more than twice the number of letters. While you're at it, try having it look generally the same so that your online documentation doesn't need different pictures for every language on the planet. Try, also, working in a differently localized version of the software, when muscle memory becomes a large part of your using the function buttons. Oops... you meant to click Undo, but instead clicked Save, because the button is 3x the size that it was in the English version.

      There's a reason that software developers use icons with text descriptions on mouseover. It's not just about saving space, it's about portability, not having to redesign the UI completely for every translation, and because *normal* people don't have a hard time learning what an icon does, and once they've learned that, it's much faster than having to read the text on a button.

    16. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "now we're reduced to such nonsense as "click on the logo orb", and "can you see the circle with what looks like a wrench and a cog in it?"."

      Sorry, but it's worse....

      Ok now click on the round blue blob thingy.... no not that one, the one in the corner. Now what do you see? the last one, what did you call it? A snake with a wheel? Click on that.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    17. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by ulski · · Score: 2

      there was a similar discussion regarding roadsigns there in Norway (or perhaps it was Denmark ). The discussion was about whether to upgrade the the old "beware of train" road sign (a pictogram with a steam locomotive). The logic was the same as with the floppy icon - why have a pictogram mimicking an object that is no longer in use? Creating good long lasting pictograms is not an easy task. Recently they tried to create a pictogram meaning "this is a toll road where you automatically get a bill in the mail, do NOT stop" (a camera takes a photo of your licenses plate, you do not need to slow down and cause traffic jams). The pictogram they came up with, was so weird that is looks like some sort of scary warning and the result is opposite - people stop and wonder what is this all about.

    18. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by swilver · · Score: 1

      More important than icons is actually placement. I will remember that I left my icon for a program somewhere on the top right much easier than that I can recognize it from a different spot on the desktop.

    19. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the train it is different. Seeing a locomotive says you "haha that is funny, funny looking train". Seeing a floppy says nothing.

    20. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by tkrotchko · · Score: 2, Informative

      "320x240 displays were the norm for Windows 3.1"

      VGA was the minimum for Windows 3.1 and it was 640x480 with 16 colors.

      The previous standard was EGA and it was 640x350.

      --
      You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
    21. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by ulski · · Score: 1

      as I said, the problem is that it is hard to come up with good pictograms that last over time. The floppy symbol made perfect sense when we used floppies. In order to create a ever lasting pictogram for "save", you could for instance create a symbol of an old heavy bank safe door? Or you could go for the red circle that means record on my old vcr (recording is also a way of saving data).

    22. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      Not that it matters, but I always thought the blue part of the FireFox logo is supposed to represent the earth, though with a coastline that doesn't correspond to any actual coastline to keep things neutral. (512x512 version here.)

    23. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends. If you have just a blinking floppy icon when saving/loading, one can guess what it means. Just a floppy icon with "X" over it (format disk) I would recommend avoiding.

    24. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      52 glyphs actually, and that's only if you stay within your 7-bit charset. "a" and "A" are definitely not writen the same way. Then you have the additional punctuation which isn't present in japanses AFAIK (,.:;) .. still better than Kanji, but Hiragana and Katakana are much easier to read aloud then the latin alphabet.

    25. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I thought "Portal?"

    26. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Alan+R+Light · · Score: 1

      Those glyphs aren't meaningless. You just don't know what they refer to.

    27. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but we're not going to see icons disappear because they're now considered a "vital branding element" by the graphic designers who think they're programmers.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    28. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by hey! · · Score: 1

      While I agree text could be used more effectively, language is prone to exactly this same effect. It's called a "dead metaphor" -- an expression whose figurative meaning is clear to us but whose literal meaning is unfamiliar.

      Broadcast -- to throw seads in a wide area as you walk.

      Panache -- a plume of horse hair on the crest of a war helmet.

      Branches (of government) -- sections of a plant's stem that separate from a common trunk.

      Push the envelope -- to approach the boundary of a mathematical region (envelope) in which an aircraft can safely operate.

      Current (electricity) -- the flow of water as in a stream or river.

      (World wide) Web - a structure formed by interweaving wibers, e.g. a spider's web.

      Figurative speech is inherent in the way people communicate with each other, whether it be with graphical symbols or words, and until people learn to be completely literal we'll have cliches that become dead metaphors. They really should be called "undead metaphors."
      Even though the figurative nature of a dead metaphor is obscure, the meaning is perfectly clear. Therefore, there's nothing wrong with using words that are a dead metaphor, in fact we'd hobble our ability to communicate if we tried to do that. Likewise there's nothing wrong with using a visual dead metaphor like radio buttons. Can you imagine trying to purge user interfaces of those?

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    29. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Whether you are conscious of it or not, your brain is wired so it can recognize a pattern, silhouette, or specific color or movement much faster than it can input, decipher, and act on a string of text.

      This is not true. I can read a string of text much faster than I can figure out what that blob with the lines is supposed to mean. And you know what? A string of text IS a pattern, so it's the best of both worlds.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Cederic · · Score: 1

      50 feet's a bit close in. I mean, sure, if you're up in a tree hide looking for a clean kill with the first arrow, but in a battle scenario?

      Fuck no, you'd shoot the first arrow a few hundred yards out and keep going until you're out.

    31. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Novus · · Score: 1

      "320x240 displays were the norm for Windows 3.1"

      VGA was the minimum for Windows 3.1 and it was 640x480 with 16 colors.

      The previous standard was EGA and it was 640x350.

      Actually, Windows 3.1 runs fine on EGA; the installation disks come with EGA drivers (640x350, 16 colours). In fact, CGA works at 640x200 with 2 colours (with the Windows 3.0 driver, which is not included in Windows 3.1). Windows 3.11 seems to have dropped EGA support and requires VGA.

    32. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I've seen Windows running on a smaller screen than that. Because I have friends who go cheap and don't know anything about computers. It was the late 90's and this guy had a small [I guess you could call it a] laptop with a black & white screen half the size of a regular screen. As if the bottom half was cut off. And it was running Windows. It didn't look to me like it had unusually shaped pixels. It looked like a 640x240 screen. I don't know what verson of Windows it was. But I don't think it was Windows CE. This was an actual laptop-sized device with disc drives. And I am never going to spell disc with a K so to the guy who actually corrected me on that, just pick and choose your battles.

    33. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit you could run windows 3.1 in standard mode with EGA.

      I know because I have used it before. (286/16, 1MB ram, 20MB HDD, EGA).

      (For someone with no computer experience teaching them to use write on Windows 3.1 was far easier than a dos based CLI word processor).

      Couldn't really use much more than the inbuilt accessories though.

      (Dunno people like the parent get their information from guessing and making it up without knowing I suppose).

      http://support.microsoft.com/KB/83297

      640 x 200 is minimum it needs - can use black and white with a CGA card.

    34. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Extremus · · Score: 1

      In order to create a ever lasting pictogram for "save",

      A picture of the Saviour parhaps? An icon with the face of Jesus, or Mohammed, or Richard Dawkins?

    35. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So can I. The vast majority of people can't. Ask your friends about their experiences reading button labels vs. identifying symbols. You may also be confused by why people use analog clocks/watches.

    36. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by ulski · · Score: 1

      Here is an example of an icon set with out the floppy http://www.dezinerfolio.com/freebie/30-free-vector-icons I'm guessing the anchor is the save icon I could be wrong of course,and that the intended meaning is a hyperlink like the html anchor tag

    37. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't want to take away your icons on the toolbar -- just don't away my menus.

    38. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      That could make for a very interesting theme. :) 'Jesus' on the save button, 'Dawkins' on the close-without-saving. :D

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    39. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google does not understand UI anymore. Just look at the newest Youtube layout; enjoy getting penalized for having lots of subscriptions and friends, and every damn link taking you to a video in a playlist.

    40. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used similar back in the day - a 286 laptop with a half-sized B&W screen. Windows 2.x was built into ROM. (no hard drive)

    41. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      And games of that era - which were about the only apps that actually used lower resolutions - were all 320x200 (very few people actually knew how to do 320x240, it was kinda arcane at the time).

      Kids these days... ~

    42. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I kinda doubt that a native (or educated foreign) English speaker would not know the literal meaning of the words "branch", "current" and "web". It's not like they describe things that ceased to exist, or even became uncommon.

    43. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by crutchy · · Score: 1

      good point, and i bet they weren't stupid enough to introduce i before e, except after c, except for the exceptions or when you don't feel like it

    44. Re:Drop the confusing pictures by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      Thank you, I will hold off from upgrading to Windows 3.11 for now.

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
  4. "Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Old people are the only ones who need icons to map directly to physical objects they're familiar with. Younger people simply learn the meanings of the icons directly, and they can look them up on Google or Wikipedia if they're curious about the icons' history.

    1. Re:"Old people icons" by mcrbids · · Score: 2

      Came here to say this. We still "record" things even though we don't use records. Why should this be any different?

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    2. Re:"Old people icons" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think of them like Chinese/Japanese ideograms. Those characters are actually little pictures of things, corrupted over the centuries. For example, the ideogram for a person is ä, which started out as a little stick figure with two legs and a body but eventually simplified into what you see.

      A person with no knowledge of these characters might not be able to work out what they mean, but there are at least 1.5 billion people who understand them perfectly because they learned them. They can even figure out the meaning of other ideograms that are combinations of simpler ones, which is similar to seeing an icon of a bookmark with a magnifying glass and inferring that it searches your bookmarks.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:"Old people icons" by mapkinase · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This comment does not make sense. Both old and young people are using the icons the same way: the learn the meaning and then they recognize the icon in a different environemnt.

      I am one of the older people, I knew what a floppy disk is and I knew what saving is, but when I first time saw a floppy disk icon, there is no way I could have figured out why on earth a "floppy disk" would mean saving a file.

      Icons are conventions and it does not matter if recognize original object behind the convention.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      That example is backwards, we called them records because they held recordings.

    5. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is just so wrong. Old people have nothing to do with why we use icons. Icons are used because humans are much more adapted to discerning shapes with a quick glance than text. The icons are shaped like old style appliances because modern ones tend to be less uniquely shaped, and because of inertia (changing an icon might cause more confusion than using an out-of-date shape). Even if you didn't know what the old microphone icon refers to, you wouldn't mistake the shape for anything else. It identifies the microphone fairly uniquely.

    6. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the ideogram for a person is ä, which started out as a little stick figure with two legs and a body but eventually simplified into what you see.

      Or, since this is Slashdot, not what you see.

    7. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody ever used vinyl albums as a means of live recording. "Records", friend, refer to *any* stored information. So you're wrong, we use more "records" now than were ever even dreamed of during the vinyl era.

    8. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. The article's premise appears to be that it makes sense for a large group of people -- those who have already learned the meanings of the conventional icons in use -- to have to relearn a new standard in order to prevent a small group of people -- those who are learning to use a computer at any given point in time -- from having to associate computer operations with graphical icons whose visual associations are not reflexive to them.

      Just from a numbers standpoint, this makes no sense, but your point, mapkinase, is valid regardless of which way the numbers fall. Does the author believe that we need a new set of numerals because the numeral "2" doesn't look like a pair of things, and "9" doesn't look like a baseball team? (And "0" doesn't look like a particle of matter colliding with a particle of anti-matter!) Horrors! How will I ever remember the significance of numerals if I can't relate them to contemporary pop concepts?

      To the author: Dude. Semiotics. It isn't that hard.

    9. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you said is funny because you seem to imply that the verb "To Record" derives from the noun "Record" rather than the other way around.

    10. Re:"Old people icons" by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      I guess only old people use iPods and Android phones then.

    11. Re:"Old people icons" by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. They could replace the save icon with the picture of an SSD drive, and people wouldn't know what it is, and still they would have to learn the meaning.

      in the same way people learn when they are kids that hearts are love (even though they don't tend to be loyal representations of hearts) or how people relate stars to "favorites" (how did that happen?).

      I was thinking about this the other day, and many icons make no sense whatsoever (Safe for backups makes no sense if you technically compare the objects) . But I got tobthe conclusion, that the save icon could be replaced with a parachute picture, at least until gravity becomes obsolete.

    12. Re:"Old people icons" by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Actually, records were called "records" because they were used to record sound. The word "record" (both as a verb and noun") has been around a lot long than the phonograph (which literally means to "write sounds"). Oh, wait, "write"? An icon of a pen or pencil? What's that?

    13. Re:"Old people icons" by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Look how far the word dashboard has come.

    14. Re:"Old people icons" by tricorn · · Score: 1

      In the Apple App Store or iTunes, they show a Cloud to mean you've purchased something but it isn't on your computer, so you can download it from "The Cloud". Now, what the heck some curly lines have to do with a server farm connected over a network that eventually gets to me through a complex radio-wave system I'm not sure...wait, aren't clouds obsolete yet?

      I've also seen a "cloud with arrow pointing to it" to mean "Save". Wait, an "arrow"? Weren't those pointy things that were used to kill animals and people and win archery contests? What do those have to do with "Save"? In 10 years, when the whole concept of "The Cloud" has been dead for a while, will such an icon even make any sense at all (maybe it will make more sense to put up a square with grid marks in it, to represent "The Matrix").

      Let's get rid of arrows completely while we're at it, how many people still use arrows in every day life, and what do they have to do with directions anyway?

      Maybe HE doesn't work on his car, but plenty of people do, and plenty of people work on other stuff that requires wrenches and other tools (that's what I take that to mean, "tools" to adjust things with). Gears? Ok, you got me, not sure what that has to do with settings, but then it NEVER made sense, why change now, it's a fairly recent bit of iconography.

      Bookmarks? They're marks. You make them in books. Even E-books. Ok, maybe they don't need to look like ribbons. Then again, I've rarely used an actual ribbon as a bookmark in a real book anyway, it's usually a strip of cardboard with some advertising on it. A ribbon is just fine, thank you. Maybe you could make them look like brass points (I know someone who still uses those to mark pages). As for using "bookmark" to mean a URL you want to save, that never really made any sense either, other than in a very generic "place holder" sense. The Internet isn't a book, and you aren't marking anything, you're saving a URL in a list.

      Radio buttons? Only programmers call them "radio buttons", who cares? Call them mutex-dots for all I care. How about "button"? You going to stop calling graphical areas where you activate something a "button"? At some point, the thing becomes the icon, it's called a button because that's what a button is, and what it has to do with keeping your shirt on and your pants up, I don't know.

      And calendars. As long as we have days grouped as weeks, months and years, you'll have calendars to help you figure it out, and it's probably going to continue to remain looking pretty similar to the way a paper calendar has always looked, so an icon representing it represents the electronic version just as much as it represents the paper version.

      We talk about someone's e-mail address all the time, isn't that what you store in an address book? Again, the thing becomes the symbol. I mean, the Apple icon for Address Book is a pretty generic looking book with an @ on the cover. Ok, it has little tabs sticking out. Oh, wait, so does the actual program, maybe the icon represents THE PROGRAM, not an "obsolete" physical address book.

      Might as well stop calling it e-mail if you're that anti-old-fashioned, i never did like that term, anyway. We called them "pnotes" on PLATO, for "Personal Notes" (as opposed to gnotes, General Notes, for a forum file, which were stored in "notesfiles". We also had "votefiles" for doing polls and such, just like Slashdot Polls, only 15-20 years earlier).

    15. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly!
      When was the last time you shot something with bow and arrow?
      But you still recognize an arrow icon as pointing in the direction an arrow would fly.

      Arrows have vanished from everyday use long before computer were invented, but the icon ist still in universal use.

    16. Re:"Old people icons" by fbjon · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Technically speaking, icons are not conventions.

      There are in fact two separate things going on here, the floppy disk is an icon representing exactly that: a floppy disk. But it is also a symbol for "save". It does not matter what the image is as long as we agree on it, because the symbol is going to be distinct from what it refers to anyway. Just like words in a language are symbols, distinct from what they mean: the word "tree" doesn't look or sound anything like an actual tree, but we have no more problem with that than with a floppy disk.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    17. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This comment does not make sense. Both old and young people are using the icons the same way: the learn the meaning and then they recognize the icon in a different environemnt.

      I am one of the older people, I knew what a floppy disk is and I knew what saving is, but when I first time saw a floppy disk icon, there is no way I could have figured out why on earth a "floppy disk" would mean saving a file.

      Icons are conventions and it does not matter if recognize original object behind the convention.

      I don't know. I remember when "save" was an arrow going into a floppy disk and "load" was an arrow pointing out of a floppy disk. The meaning was clear immediatly.

    18. Re:"Old people icons" by Jim+Hall · · Score: 4, Informative

      This comment does not make sense. Both old and young people are using the icons the same way: the learn the meaning and then they recognize the icon in a different environemnt. I am one of the older people, I knew what a floppy disk is and I knew what saving is, but when I first time saw a floppy disk icon, there is no way I could have figured out why on earth a "floppy disk" would mean saving a file. Icons are conventions and it does not matter if recognize original object behind the convention.

      Turns out, there is actually some scholarly findings about how older and younger audiences understand and use icons. I just finished up a grad course on information design, and it included research on this topic.

      For example, Charalambos Koutsourelakis & Konstantinos Chorianopoulos wrote in the Information Design Journal in 2010 [IDJ 18(1), 22–35] about "Icons in mobile phones: Comprehensibility differences between older and younger users." They selected icons from mobile phones, and tested older v younger audiences to determine how well they understood the intended meaning of each icon.

      In short: Koutsourelakis and Chorianopoulos found that comprehension of icons differs based on the age of the audience. Icons with a high-level of abstraction that do not have immediate real-life metaphors were often difficult for audiences to grasp.

      Koutsourelakis and Chorianopoulos did not comment on the qualities of successful icons common across age groups. However, their samples of successful icons suggest icons that provide a metaphor to real-life activities, and those with which users may have some prior experience, are most likely to be understood by both age groups. Successful icons across both age groups used a tools metaphor to represent “Settings”, and a depiction of an address book for “Phonebook” or a calendar for “Organizer”. Audiences in both age groups found these icons easy to understand

      If you're curious about their results:

      Top 5 best icons for younger users:

      1. wrench for Settings (C4)
      2. screwdriver + wrench for Settings
      3. mobile phone + screwdriver for Settings
      4. wrench for Settings
      5. spiral notebook with classic phone icon for Phonebook (B3)

      Top 5 best icons for older users:

      1. book + phone for Phonebook
      2. book with tabs for Phonebook
      3. spiral notebook with classic phone icon for Phonebook (B3)
      4. wrench for Settings (C4)
      5. picture of calendar for Organizer

      The 5 worst icons for younger users:

      1. picture of a PDA + stylus for Organizer (B4)
      2. mobile phone + circle "i" icon for Calls (A3)
      3. collection of folders with left/right arrows for Calls (E3)
      4. notepad with clock and phone for Calls
      5. collection of blocks for Applications (C3)

      The 5 worst icons for older users:

      1. collection of blocks for Applications (C3)
      2. picture of a PDA + stylus for Organizer (B4)
      3. mobile phone + circle "i" icon for Calls (A3)
      4. collection of folders with left/right arrows for Calls (E3)
      5. manila folder for Files

      So while I agree icons are conventions, and sometimes you just learn what an icon "means", people really do associate certain real-life metaphors with actions that are represented by icons.

    19. Re:"Old people icons" by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I think of them like Chinese/Japanese ideograms. Those characters are actually little pictures of things, corrupted over the centuries. For example, the ideogram for a person is ä, which started out as a little stick figure with two legs and a body but eventually simplified into what you see.

      A person with no knowledge of these characters might not be able to work out what they mean, but there are at least 1.5 billion people who understand them perfectly because they learned them. They can even figure out the meaning of other ideograms that are combinations of simpler ones, which is similar to seeing an icon of a bookmark with a magnifying glass and inferring that it searches your bookmarks.

      So how about we start introducing Chinese characters one by one until the whole interface is changed? Week one, save. Week two, print. Until eventually everything that is arbitrary is in Chinese.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    20. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to go to ancient chinese to see ideograms. Latin "A" is the head of a cow -upside down- if you haven't realized.

    21. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think of them like Chinese/Japanese ideograms. Those characters are actually little pictures of things, corrupted over the centuries. For example, the ideogram for a person is ä, which started out as a little stick figure with two legs and a body but eventually simplified into what you see.

      A person with no knowledge of these characters might not be able to work out what they mean, but there are at least 1.5 billion people who understand them perfectly because they learned them. They can even figure out the meaning of other ideograms that are combinations of simpler ones, which is similar to seeing an icon of a bookmark with a magnifying glass and inferring that it searches your bookmarks.

      Actually, instead of replacing icons with words, why not just replace them with actual Chinese words which are usually only one or two characters and take up much less space. Like someone just said, we will all have to learn Chinese eventually anyway.

    22. Re:"Old people icons" by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you often need more than one character to represent concepts like "print" or "save", at which point you might as well just write the function in English.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    23. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We still "dial" a number on phones with no rotary dial.

    24. Re:"Old people icons" by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately you often need more than one character to represent concepts like "print" or "save", at which point you might as well just write the function in English.

      Not quite -- as the logograph association isn't phonetic, it can be considered essentially language-neutral, and hence removes the need for localisation.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    25. Re:"Old people icons" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "sunrise method" on apple's app store does just that. cool little app

  5. Let's see now... by davester666 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microphones...still used everywhere, they've just changed their shape.
    Magnifying Glasses..still used to see small things, or did I miss out on the genetic change given people 20-10 eyesight.
    Binoculars...see Magnifying glasses [I suppose they are less common just because fewer people seem to be spending time experiencing the great outdoors].
    Televisions...um, what Universe is this tool living in?
    Wrenches and Gears...I guess once everyone now over 30 dies, civilization ends or everything has switched to using magnets

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    1. Re:Let's see now... by HEMI426 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm somewhat scared that people have never had to use a wrench to fix anything. Most of the self-respecting geeks I know are also gearheads... No one is a musician any more? Microphones are unknown to most people? I agree...What Universe is this tool living in?

    2. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Photography...we take more pictures now than ever before, although only high-end cameras look like cameras from the old days

      Voicemail...is still there and relatively often used, atleast here

    3. Re:Let's see now... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 2

      For the television icon, at least, it's directly related to the rabbit-ears issue - no one uses them anymore, and kids have no idea what that "V" over the television means.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    4. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ive seen this as a rectangle over a little stand. But as for the others, bookmarks, folders, clipboards... everyone still sees those. We're not exactly living in star trek yet.

    5. Re:Let's see now... by HEMI426 · · Score: 1

      I actually built my own antenna to replace a set of rabbit ears, although the rabbit ears and the antenna that replaced them resides in the attic. Maybe I'm just too old and have too much to do to pay for any TV.

    6. Re:Let's see now... by LordLucless · · Score: 2

      Televisions are the same as microphones - they're used everywhere, but they look nothing like the bulky box with the rabbit-ear antenna on top that adorns icons. And changing them to look like modern televisions wouldn't work, cause modern televisions aren't really iconic - most consumer electronic devices seem to be converging on a featureless black box (physical description, not poorly-understood process metaphor).

      Magnifying Glasses and Binoculars - I can't remember the last time I've used either of those. Maybe it is a disinterest with the great outdoors - or just a drop in bird-watching as a relatively common pastime. I know plenty of people who go camping, trekking, geo-caching (if you count that) - and none of them regularly use binoculars. I've very rarely even seen magnifying glasses in the stereotypical design - although my grandparents used a square-framed magnifying glass for reading until we got them a kindle.

      Wrenches and gears - I use a wrench to change my car tires. That's about it. And there just aren't that many everyday mechanical objects anymore that people have common exposure to those elements. Almost everything that used to be mechanical is now electronic.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    7. Re:Let's see now... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Microphones...still used everywhere, they've just changed their shape.

      We're talking about icons ... isn't the shape the important bit?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Let's see now... by EdIII · · Score: 2

      Everything you mentioned is debatable though as to whether or not it could be recognized for its function.

      A sextant would hardly be recognized today as being related to navigation. It's not like you could use that as an icon for Google navigation on a smartphone.

      Well except the wrenches and gears. Anyone technically inclined is going to to assume it either means settings, configurations, or basically anything that has to do with the low level function or repair of a program. Technology is going to have to change at a real fundamental level before you no longer need a wrench. We still use bricks and nails today and those are pretty damn old. Objects like wrenches, hammers, and ladders are going to be pretty self-explanatory for some time.

      What I find interesting is you missed the ones that are hardly debatable IMO:

      1) Radio button... well I am kind of guessing this a radio button on a form? Cuz I have never seen a radio icon in a mainstream program... ever. If it is the form one, it makes no sense at all.

      2) Calendar button. Uhhhhhh.... how else are you going to visually represent days and weeks grouped into months? Until we switch over to Stardate blah blah blah I don't see that representation changing much at all or losing its relevancy.

      3) Manila folder. People still print out hard copies all the time and need to physically group these objects together. A folder makes logical sense as an object that accomplishes that in the most efficient way possible. A book, even more so. Even with the advent of ebooks and readers I don't think physical books are going to go away for another 100 years or more, and will be recognizable for what they are for hundreds of years after that. We still recognize a spear as something to shove into somebody right? A book will represent information for quite a long time.

    9. Re:Let's see now... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it was just the rectangle it could mean tablet, screen, box, window.

      What it comes down to is that computers are becoming multipurpose devices with so many things being done in software, which means that if you implemented realistic symbols everything would look like everything else. That's is precisely what icons are not supposed to do.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    10. Re:Let's see now... by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Ya, but maybe the author is only 12 and has never left the room to see the world? I also see clipboards (ie, pass any voter signup booth on the street), bookmarks (paper books still outsell electronic fluff by a zillion to one), calendars (even electronic ones are laid out in the same way and any school that doesn't teach this needs fixing), manilla folders & envelopes (ubiquitous), and on occasion blue prints.

      Now to be fair carbon copies are really old. However I doubt the concept is foreign to kids, it's just one of those phrases and terms you learn even if outdated (ie, think of all the English we have from Shakespeare). And I've never seen an icon of carbon copy until I went to that article...

      Unless they're telling us that Idiocracy was a documentary.

    11. Re:Let's see now... by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      A sextant would hardly be recognized today as being related to navigation. It's not like you could use that as an icon for Google navigation on a smartphone.

      Well, maybe not in your family. It would certainly work in mine,

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    12. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, no one who pays for cable uses Rabbit Ears anymore. I still have Rabbit Ears on my T.V.

      Now.... GET OFF MY LAWN!

    13. Re:Let's see now... by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to say having a mic there really threw me as well. it isn't just musicians, nobody has gone to a karaoke bar? Seen American Idol? been to a concert? Seen an interview?

      Maybe the guy had to stretch it for page views or something. Oh and radio buttons? only geeks and programmers call them that because dealing with average folks 6 days a week i can tell you they call those "single choice buttons", oh and the wrench they always call either the prefs button or the option button, nobody I've talked to calls it a wrench. But if he decides to write another one of these i suggest he talk to some actual folks and see what they say first as some of his choices are bizarre.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Let's see now... by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      YMMV. There're still TVs with set-top aerials around here. They're quite common in blocks of flats which charge for access to the building's communal satellite/cable service, or rental houses where the landlord is too cheap to install a proper rooftop aerial (student housing comes to mind).

    15. Re:Let's see now... by mirix · · Score: 1

      Suppose they are dumbdfounded why the generic 'phone' symbol is usually a Western Electric model 500 too. (or sometimes it's just the handset / headpiece part of this phone - "type G") [in north america at least] - or a bell for that matter.

      They won't know why the fuck we "dial" a number, either. What a goofy story. Most words come from prior generations as always, these are just 'visual' words with a back-story (that may or may not be known).

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    16. Re:Let's see now... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      Microphones: actually haven't changed their shape, but only the really nice and expensive ones still look like that.
      Microphone Examples

      Magnifying Glasses: Still quite widely in use, but apparently not so well-known among the Jersey Shore iPhone OMGLolcats crowd as they are among the Bill Nye vs Niel DeGrasse Tyson awesomeness level debaters.
      Mag Glass Example

      Binoculars: Really? People don't know what these are? They are still the best way to get a stereo 3D view of something at huge distances in a compact device. I have several pair on my shelf right now. People have them at sporting events every time I go.
      Binocular Example

      Television: My television still has an antenna. After the recent switch from analog to digital, however, it is no longer the rabbit ear dual collapsible one in the icon. It now looks vaguely like some sort of alien ship or horrible instrument of torture with alternating flat fins(and sharp edges...). Not sure it's worth changing the icon, though.
      Antenna Example

      Wrenches and Gears: Because what happens under the hood of your car is pure magic, and nobody can explain it. Even if young folks don't know what gears actually do, they recognize them from the steampunk jewelry and stuff.
      Gears Example

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    17. Re:Let's see now... by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      Even THIS crazy contraption still has rabbit-ear antennas built in it to receive analog signals even through the digital antenna. Just because you never needed one and had cable or satellite doesn't mean a lot of people don't use them on a daily basis.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    18. Re:Let's see now... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      People don't use wrenches on cars any more, unless they actually enjoy it. Cars are no longer built with the expectation that the owner will have to perform more than the most basic of essential tasks like filling the various containers with petrol, oil, or water. They run much more reliably, and a lot of the parts which needed the most attention - carburetor, distributor - have been replaced by computerised systems which work longer and more reliably and if they do break can't be repaired without a extensive training and specialised equipment. The only use most people have for a wrench now is occasional plumbing work, tightening seals when things start to leak or unblocking U-bends.

      As for microphones... they exist, but no longer in the old style of the featured icons. They are now all either hidden inside of things (phones, laptops), or of the ball-on-a-stick design.

    19. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's all ball bearings these days

    20. Re:Let's see now... by icebraining · · Score: 1

      RTFA. The author doesn't say the binoculars and magnifying glasses are outdated, just that they should be switched (right now, binoculars are often used to represent local (in-document) search, while magnifying glasses are used to represent system-wide search).

    21. Re:Let's see now... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The only use most people have for a wrench now is occasional plumbing work, tightening seals when things start to leak or unblocking U-bends.

      You forgot "assembling IKEA furniture" but odds are if it needs a wrench it will come with it :p

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YMMV, but the old Radio Shack rabbit ears work great for ATSC. (I'm ready for the football.)

    23. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microphones haven't changed their shape. A good large diaphragm condenser still looks pretty much like that icon.

    24. Re:Let's see now... by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      The problem is that if you remove the rabbit ears, the icon to the television become a lot more ambiguous. There is a lot of things that are rounded rectangles with another rounded rectangle inside of it.

    25. Re:Let's see now... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      We're not exactly living in star trek yet

      speak for yourself

      ooooh yeah seven of nine, now where were we ;)

    26. Re:Let's see now... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      who would put rabbit ears on a tv set anyway? they are disgusting things that breed disease. you should throw them out, except in summer when you might need something to keep the flies away from the bbq

    27. Re:Let's see now... by crutchy · · Score: 1

      yeah same as those scientific wankers who still use "lasers". everyone knows in the future they will be called "blasters", so we may as well start calling them that now to be trendy

    28. Re:Let's see now... by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      "They run much more reliably"

      Says the man that has never owned an Alpha Romeo.

      No, they really dont. It's just that society has became lazy to learning how to maintain their cars. Oil changes are really easy in the driveway, yet 90% of car owners cant do it. They are happy to pay $50.00 for that oil change instead of spending 45 minutes doing it themselves for $20.00.

      I have owned cars from the 80's that have went 300,000 miles. VW beetles from the 60's and 70's as well as toyotas and hondas were legendary for their reliability.

      Today? not so much. GM cars are still junk and break down, try fixing a broken BCM computer in a GM because it was made in china with defective caps. Oh you cant because it has to be married to the car's ECM using the Vin and a special tool. How about my incredibly reliable Jeep grand cherokee that has 250,000 miles on it and is running strong but has had the heater blend doors fail 3 times(all replaced under the extended warranty) now and is a known defect that Dodge did not bother to fix for 5 model years. And a couple guys in a garage discovered the real fix for it.

      Oh and those legendary Honda and Toyota reliability? Ask Civic and Accord owners how reliable the motor mounts are that rip apart every 15,000 miles. or the toyota owners from any of the last 4 fiascos.

      cars today are not better, just different. No you dont have to clean and replace the points every 1200 miles, but that has not been the case cince 1978 when electronic ignition came around. and yes iridium spark plugs go 100,000 miles. but good luck getting to the plugs as the moron engineers bury them under the valve covers.

      I have had new cars fail for software problems. People dont use wrenches on cars anymore for two reasons. 1 - the car makers try like hell to make them non serviceable and 2 - people are a lot more lazy than they used to be.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    29. Re:Let's see now... by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 1

      I reckon its one of the side effects of that quantum entaglement malarky the Chinese are meddling with, the article comes from 50 years in the future. If we had quantum decryption ready we could decipher the true meaning which is a desperate warning that the LHC was about to awaken Cthulhu.

    30. Re:Let's see now... by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Not least, manila folders actually still exist and are used.

    31. Re:Let's see now... by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      IKEA never needs a wrench. It usually needs a hex key.

    32. Re:Let's see now... by tepples · · Score: 2

      There's a difference. "Lasers" shoot a beam of light, while "blasters" shoot what appear to be bolts of plasma according to Wookieepedia. That's why blaster shots travel slower than c. Or maybe I'm missing the point.

    33. Re:Let's see now... by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure most young people have also seen calendars, clipboards, film cameras, and Manila folders outside of a museum.

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    34. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We call those allen wrenches in the states.

    35. Re:Let's see now... by swalve · · Score: 1

      I remember listening to a cartoonist talking about iconography. If you are doing a background, pictures had to be hanging off of picture hanging wire, because otherwise the viewer couldn't tell whether it was a picture or a window. Same thing with the universal grocery bag with a baguette and a bundle of celery.

    36. Re:Let's see now... by swalve · · Score: 1

      There are no rabbit ears on that picture. And the signal the antenna is receiving is still analog, just with digital information encoded onto it instead of analog information. Digital TV still uses the exact same frequencies as analog TV.

    37. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use rabbit ears to get all 9 channels broadcast over the air in my city, in high def. That's right it's a better picture than directv provides, and it's free.

    38. Re:Let's see now... by Sporkinum · · Score: 1

      Yep. That would be me. I ditched Cable, and have a set of rabbit ears plugged into the tuner card on my HTPC.

      --
      "He's lost in a 'floyd hole"
    39. Re:Let's see now... by tixxit · · Score: 2

      I'd say oil changes are a bad example. For the cost of oil + filter, your usually saving $10 by changing it at home. And you end up with a jug of oil you'll need to take to a dump to dispose of. Moreover, the first car I owned put the oil filter over the axle. The second over the front cross member. So, not only is it hard to get to, but, as near as I can tell, impossible to take off without getting oil all over the axle/cross-member, my driveway, and my arm (due to the way I have to reach around to get it). I'd say brakes are a better example. People get paranoid about their brakes, but in reality it is one of the simplest jobs (especially since most cars come standard with disc brakes now). Pads? 2 nuts. Rotors? 2 more nuts. Your done. Worst case, you may have to smack 'em with a hammer.

    40. Re:Let's see now... by JazzHarper · · Score: 3, Informative

      What Universe is this tool living in?

      Scott Hanselman is a principal program manager at Microsoft. (I am not joking.)

    41. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not least, manila folders actually still exist and are used.

      Nah, all mine are chocolate.

    42. Re:Let's see now... by jimicus · · Score: 1

      He was referring to the design of the microphone used for the icon; this sort of thing

    43. Re:Let's see now... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      I have to say having a mic there really threw me as well. it isn't just musicians, nobody has gone to a karaoke bar? Seen American Idol? been to a concert? Seen an interview?

      Since when did they have vintage valve-amplified ribbon radio-announcer mics on American Idol? I think the author's point on that one was the type of mic. They've specifically avoided the stick-and-ball of your standard vocal mic, which is the one everyone would recognise. I'm guessing that the rationale was that stick-and-ball is for singers, and the vintage mic is for speaking, and the icons shown were for voice recognition, but it is still true that that mic isn't an intuitive representation to most.

      To put it interms of semiotics, the designer failed to account for Rosch prototype theory, which says that the form with highest iconicity is the most commonly encountered form.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    44. Re:Let's see now... by Bomazi · · Score: 1

      A Hex key is a type of wrench. Another name for it is Allen wrench.

    45. Re:Let's see now... by shinobiX · · Score: 1

      Thanks, I'm really glad I'm not the only one who thinks this guy's retarded :)

    46. Re:Let's see now... by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      I guess the metaphor is not for using wrenches for fixing things, it is for motor tunning.

      Anyway, stupid article is stupid, and all that. We don't go changing a well stablished language just because the shape of our phones changed.

    47. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its cheaper for me to take the car into a Tires Plus for an oil change on a truck than to buy the oil and do it myself. They make their money by telling people that got the 20$ oil change that they might die immediately if they don't do 4000 bucks worth of other things.

    48. Re:Let's see now... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      No, everyone knows that in the future they'll be called lasguns. They were called blasters in the past - long, long ago in a galaxy far, far away.

    49. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Shure SM-58 mic rocks the same today as it did in 1976.

    50. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "nobody I've talked to calls it a wrench"

      Me neither, because it's a spanner.

    51. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue with the microphone isn't that nobody knows what a microphone is, it's that UI designers persist in using microphone styles that are now only used in professional studios, and that most of us haven't seen or used in decades. Everyone knows what a cheap karaoke microphone looks like, but that's not what's on the icons.

    52. Re:Let's see now... by bjb · · Score: 1

      Microphones...still used everywhere, they've just changed their shape.

      Shh! I think there's one hiding in the lamp!

      Damn, those suckers have gotten small...

      --
      Never hit your grandmother with a shovel, for it leaves a bad impression on her mind...
    53. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he is living in a fix what ain't broke make things even worse for no reason other than self aggrandizement universe.

    54. Re:Let's see now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmmm... I'm confused, did you read the post, or just look at all the pretty icons?

  6. Slashdot should talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Borgified Bill Gates representing Microsoft?

    1. Re:Slashdot should talk by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      They don't use that any more, though every now and again I see a story that makes me wish they'd bring it back when appropriate.

    2. Re:Slashdot should talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh god, please someone make a Steve 'Monkey' Ballmer.
      I'll actually pay you. (probably won't be much since he'd probably want to sue you out of existence, still)

    3. Re:Slashdot should talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not an icon, that's a parody.

      Thank you thank you, the AC will be here wit humor all week.

    4. Re:Slashdot should talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By this point, they should have a Borg version of Steve Jobs, Larry Page, Mark Zuckerberg, and the current CEOs of just about any major tech company in the US.

      "We will add your biological and technological distinctiveness to our own. Your culture will adapt to service us. Resistance is futile."

    5. Re:Slashdot should talk by antdude · · Score: 2

      It should be replaced with a sweating and angry Steve Ballmer throwing a chair. :P

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    6. Re:Slashdot should talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the monitor throwing asshole who thought that 64K was enough for a desktop computer and who parked in disabled parking places represents crapple.

    7. Re:Slashdot should talk by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      or the metro save icon.

      or two looking glass icons next to each other(like recommended way to do a search icon for a wp7 app, only problem is that you can't remap the hw/os provided search button at the bottom button bar, so you add another icon that just looks just like it next to it - if the user presses the wrong one then BAM he is out of your app.).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Slashdot should talk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drop it dude. It was fucking dumb the first hundred thousand times, you just look like you drink dick on #100001.

  7. like, whateeeeever by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Read it on ycombinator about a year ago.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  8. A Complete Non-Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what do we use? Should we have a picture of a piece of fiber for everything? Maybe a few ones and zeroes? This is a non-issue by a blogger without enough new ideas.

    1. Re:A Complete Non-Issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose that if the futurists are right after all, and we all spend our days as data beings in VR environments, all icons would be "obsolete" and this guy would have us use text only, or possibly just maths. *sigh*
      But I think that a "virtual" manilla folder does at least as good a job of keeping related items together as its real life counterpart, and it doesn't really matter that most people don't use real manilla folders any more.
      What's next? Banning swords from video games?
      (Also, as a response to a sibling post by Anne Thwacks:

      Most people have not the slightest idea what the icons are, because they are too damn small, and have to mouse-over to get at the text.

      If they can't make out the icon, they can't read the text either and should lower the resolution or zoom. However, you're the first one I hear complaining about this, so I think it's just you.

      The entire problem goes away if you use text in the first place. (Literate people can recognise single words every bit as fast as pictures)

      That turns out to be false. People don't recognise word shapes, but rather just the letters and sort of piece the word together, where the order of the letters isn't as big a factor as once assumed. And then that word has to be interpreted in context. This is a relatively slow process actually, which is one of the reasons that in many situations where we can't get around text (file names, code, bookmarks, task bars) we use icons and colours in a support role.
      And there are also practical reasons in many cases why a small icon is more desirable than a piece of text which has to be bigger to achieve the same recognisability.)

    2. Re:A Complete Non-Issue by Dan541 · · Score: 2

      Exactly, even kids today who have never seen a floppy disk know what the icon represents.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    3. Re:A Complete Non-Issue by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      If they can't make out the icon, they can't read the text either and should lower the resolution or zoom. However, you're the first one I hear complaining about this, so I think it's just you.

      I don't deny having difficulty knowing what many icons are supposed to be, but in fairness, a lot of people I have tried to introduce to Ubuntu with Unity had the same problem.

      Fundamentally, 64 pixels icons might work at 72dpi, but at 225dpi, they might as well be squashed insects. As I type this, there is a search bar preceded by a bunch of multi-coloured dots, not unlike a cat's paw print, with each toe a different colour. It is completely meaningless. However, the words "Search with Google" appear next to it - its obvious what that means. There is just no contest. The words may take more space, but they are worth a thousand Icons!

      As to lowering the resolution - you can't do PCB layout or schematic capture with piss-poor(tm) resolution, and I really like to ahve two documents open on my screen side by side, that is why I paid for a decent screen. It I wanted piss-poor(tm) resolution, I would still be using my 640x480 POS monitor that is relegated to command-line use in the server room. (Hint:Lawn, off)

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    4. Re:A Complete Non-Issue by Gideon+Wells · · Score: 1

      I would argue that if we follow his reasoning why stop at icons? Let's apply his logic to a word since he brings up "radio" buttons.

      Everyone knows how confused people are with the term computer. How can anyone use computers with such a confusing and contradictory term. Computers are humans capable of performing above average mental mathematical calculations using their minds alone without the aid of machines. Calling a machine a computer may have been tongue-in-cheek for a time, but now it is just a ticking time bomb of confusion that needs updated. We need to fix and rename digital machines that we currently call computers.

      In short, yes, the guy is an idiot. He fails to realize words change meaning and thus images can. There is no difference between a 3.25 disk for a save image and some committee designed image as long as we are taught it means that. After all, how many people care that the power button on computers, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Power_symbol , has a meaning in binary? How many care?

      --
      by Anonymous Coward: I, for one, welcome the shift from car analogies to pizza analogies. um.. overlords?
  9. Many of these items are still around by erice · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wrenches, gears, magnifying glasses, screw drivers. These are not obsolete tools. Kids still ride bicycles. Bicycles still have gears and near screw drivers and wrenches for adjustment and repair. Magnifying glasses aren't the most useful of items but they are still cheap and as often seen now as 20 years ago.

    1. Re:Many of these items are still around by Pf0tzenpfritz · · Score: 2

      If you were into electronics (sort of literally), you'd consider magnifying glasses as pretty much "the most useful of items". Electronic components are unlikely to become bigger in the future and electronics are not exactly about to become obsolete, so the magnifying glass still will be with us for some time. Heck, you can't even read the type number on most microchips without some good light and a magnifying glass.

      --
      Oh, the beautiful gloss of greality!
    2. Re:Many of these items are still around by EdIII · · Score: 1

      The blogger is young punk. Magnifying glasses will be around for a long time. Anyone sufficiently advanced in age has a couple laying around the house and in their wallet (the flat ones) to read things.

      Just wait till they get older :)

    3. Re:Many of these items are still around by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      When I complained to my eye doc that I'm needing new glasses more often, he told me "you're growing up!" Ha ha.
      That fine print on PCBs and components is almost impossible to read. Head-mounted binocular magnifying glasses FTW.

    4. Re:Many of these items are still around by Darinbob · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember, we old people can just break their bikes and cars and they won't be able to fix them, preventing them from doing away with us entirely. We can even pass messages to the resistance in envelopes as they won't realize they can be opened. I'm mimeographing our manifesto as I write this.

    5. Re:Many of these items are still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can read all those numbers and fine print and yet I get stuck with a glasses restriction on my driver's license because I'm basically blind in one eye. Society!!! Y U NO MAKE SENSE?!?

    6. Re:Many of these items are still around by icebraining · · Score: 1

      The author is not that young. You just forgot to RTFA and so you missed the fact that he never said magnifying glasses are obsolete, just that they don't make sense to represent what they do (high breadth search).

    7. Re:Many of these items are still around by MiG82au · · Score: 1

      That's OK, because I can't solder those bastards for shit anyway :) I can magnify the image, but not shrink my fingers and jitters.

    8. Re:Many of these items are still around by daniel_mcl · · Score: 1

      Your example of gears is bicycles? That's cool, I guess. But, you know, *cars*...

      --
      I used to read Caltizzle. I was a lot cooler than you.
    9. Re:Many of these items are still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bicycles have sprockets.

    10. Re:Many of these items are still around by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, that won't work. They'll throw away the bikes and cars and have the Chinese build them another on the cheap.

    11. Re:Many of these items are still around by erice · · Score: 1

      Your example of gears is bicycles? That's cool, I guess. But, you know, *cars*...

      Sure. Cars have gears. But they are only visible if you work on them to the level that you actually open a gear box. Not many people to that. Bicycle chain rings and cogs, on the other hand, are fully exposed. They are impossible to miss even you don't work work on them at all.

    12. Re:Many of these items are still around by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      It's a better example. Hours of disassembly to get the transmission out and open it up for the car vs. *point* "look, gears!" for the bike...

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  10. I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by isopropanol · · Score: 5, Informative

    But all the other ones are just plain wrong...
    Only the name is wrong with radio buttons...
    I, and most other people who have to take paperwork away from a desk, use clipboards daily,
    Books are still quite normal around here, especially if you've been to school,
    People still use address books and calenders, electronic devices supplement them,
    Voicemail icon yes, it is dated,
    Every office I've been in has had lots of beige folders,
    Almost every desk phone has a handset that looks somewhat like that, even VoIP phones,
    Physical magnifying glasses and binocuilars are still for looking for stuff,
    Most people around here still get at least bills in envelopes,
    If said 20-something has ever known anyone who took shop classes they should know what a wrench is (though what a wrench has to do with settings, I don't know),
    Microphones like that are still used in recording studios and on bar stages,
    Polaroids look like prints...,
    Might not know why it's got feelers, but it still looks like a TV,
    Last time I made a carbon copy, I was filling out a waybill... last Thursday (also a mimeograph machine does not do carbon copies, it makes mimeographs)

    1. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 5, Funny

      If said 20-something has ever known anyone who took shop classes they should know what a wrench is (though what a wrench has to do with settings, I don't know),

      Easy. Wrenches are used to break things.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    2. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Sad but true. Most middle and highschools have gutted their shop classes. When I was in highschool I was the last group to get machining, woodshop, basic fabrication and welding. And it's not like this was some ancient place, we had oxy-acetel, plasma, mig and tig. 3 types of CNC machines, and a computer assisted one. All gone the year after I graduated.

      As for the GP's comment on tape? Well, we still use tape backups as part of our offsite backup solution. We also use HDD's and an online cloud based service(yeah don't remind me).

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    3. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Mostly agree except for the carbon copy part. From what I've seen carbon copies are basically extinct and nearly 100% replaced by Carbonless Copy Paper and most people just refer to them as "triplicate makers" or something. Note: the wrench for settings is probably a throwback to when cars were tuned by adjust timing belts and stuff instead of hooking a laptop up to the ECU.

    4. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the name is wrong with radio buttons...

      What, you've never seen an erstwhile standard car radio? Five buttons, push one in at a time... simple, easy way to preset your favorite stations.

    5. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Easy. Wrenches are used to break things.

      Encryption for example.

    6. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You. You reading this. Don't post it. You're thinking of it, but don't.

    7. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Easy. Wrenches are used to break things.

      Even encryption.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      In Windows, settings are used to fix things.

    9. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the name is wrong with radio buttons...

      Please explain why.

    10. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      though what a wrench has to do with settings, I don't know

      You don't need a wrench in normal use of an device. You get the tools when something needs to be adjusted or fixed. Settings are "under the hood", where most people never need to look. The metaphor contains an implicit warning that you can break things if you don't know what you're doing.

      I have to explain "CC" to most people, even people who've seen actual carbon copies. That's because CC is an English acronym and means nothing to a person who would call it "Durchschlag". We use icons precisely because they don't need translating. To use an icon based on words is the height of disingeniousness, IMO.

    11. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by allo · · Score: 1

      they are not radiating at all.

    12. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Cool! I only got to play with CNC machines in my second year of an engineering course under strict supervision. Programming G codes was as simple as LOGO so I can see how it would work even early in high school.

    13. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "chan4chan"? You must be new here...

    14. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by nurbles · · Score: 1

      Only the name is wrong with radio buttons...

      Why? On a radio you have a set of choices, of which you may select only one at any given time. That sounds precisely like a set of radio buttons to me. Most computer users have had exposure to a radio, too, in the dashboard of their (or their parents') car, although the radio display now shows only the currently selected item (digital display) instead of the whole list (dial). Perhaps the name "radio buttons" would be more appropriate if the list of choices were hidden and the user was forced to cycle through them?

      (though what a wrench has to do with settings, I don't know)

      You do know that wrenches are used to make adjustments to settings, especially of things like valves, when the frequency of adjustment doesn't justify the extra cost of a permanent control wheel? They're used to adjust tension and spacing at several places within a car/truck and in general to "tune" the "settings" of a vehicle (or other things.). They can also be used simply to (dis)assemble things. Personally, I'm a bit more confused about how a gear represents customer adjustable settings, because changing the gearing on things is far, far more complicated than using a wrench to open/close a valve a bit more. But, since our physical world has few things as adjustable as software, we either invent a new, arbitrary symbol and get everyone to adopt it or pick something similar, like a wrench.

    15. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, wrenches are used for password recovery.

    16. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gear represents the inner workings of a system (it's current settings). They aren't meant to represent making changes to those settings, so the gears would be better for basic users (works as it is, no need to change anything) and the wrench/screwdriver would be for more experienced users (just gonna make some adjustments here, you know, for efficiency). It's true that electronic systems don't have gears, but a circuit board is hardly "iconic".

    17. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Ghostworks · · Score: 1

      I agree with your general sentiment that many of these icons are not particularly outdated so long as you accept the underlying metaphor to begin with. For example, a magnifying glass is probably no more or less used today than it was 60 years ago. It was always a very loose metaphor, referring more to a caricature of Sherlock Holmes than anything else. Bookmarks are also quite easy to grok if you accept the notion of the web as a "book" of independent documents (which even in the 90s seemed weird to me, as places in cyberspace metaphor worked much better for the web than the documents in a sequential book metaphor did, even then).

      For some of your specifics, though, I have to disagree. First, there is a definite bias towards items a paper-heavy office. That's fine, but the largest consumers of technology don't work in those anymore. Some are not in offices, and others are in offices where all of their work is through a company system on the computer.

      Anything that's based on technology from 60-100 years ago is definitely dated, because they have to pic a single incarnation of the technology that stands out as much as possible from other items. Modern design aesthetic is to smooth corners, hide the pokey bit, and as much as possible reduce every device to a rectangle with a screen (which maybe you can touch).

      Polaroids look like Polaroid prints. Most pictures look like Kodak prints (rectangles with a picture covering it completely) and pretty much no one prints their photos anymore. They are stored on their computer instead of in an album, or carried on a phone instead of in a wallet.

      Many people receive bills in the form of an email saying either, "it's time to log in to the web site and pay your bill," or, "we have deducted the required amount from the bank account you provided. Thank you for using auto-pay."

      Microphones used in bars an stages look something like a metal ice cream cone -- a conical grip and an a wire mesh screen -- not in the studio style, like a mesh hot dog suspended by a forked base.

      The voicemail icon is wrong on a couple of different levels, because the answering machines that were replaced by voicemail hadn't used a removable reel-to-reel cassette in a decade. They really had to reach back.

    18. Re:I'll concede on the floppy disk and tape... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure they are. A dot inside a ring is a common symbol for something radiating.

  11. How to make $3.50 online by billcopc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Business plan for making $3.50 online:

    1. Be an ignorant hipster microserf excitable attention whore
    2. Write an ignorant article that makes you and your equally unenlightened followers giddy
    3. Submit to slashdot and hope it's one of those new moronic editors who reviews it
    4. Traffic
    5. ??? (hint: cinnamon-chai lattés until your head implodes)
    6. PROFIT!

    This site's getting so bad, it's making Gizmodo look good.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
    1. Re:How to make $3.50 online by mattydont · · Score: 1

      Thank god I read your comment..... as a 24''something, I still remember "B drive" floppy's" yeah those huge fuckers.... But saying icons are dated is like saying the wheel has been around for ever.. lets get rid of it with something else round...... what are people going to start using? You sir are correct, i hate hipsters honestly and i do dryland dog sledding on a kickbike while wearing 5 toe shoes..... But you've probably never heard of it.......

    2. Re:How to make $3.50 online by Sacred+Wolf · · Score: 2

      I actually read this article on Cracked months ago. Slashdot has been beaten to the punch by Cracked. Let that sink in for a minute.

    3. Re:How to make $3.50 online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Duuuude! 24"???

      Do you ever have second dates?

    4. Re:How to make $3.50 online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read the article? The guy makes a few (but only a few) good points since he doesn't have suggestions for fixing the issues. The /. summary isn't great.

      I've never figured out why a clipboard means paste and I never made the radio button connection (and I had those types of buttons until I was 15). Any clipboard=paste ideas from the people over 26?

    5. Re:How to make $3.50 online by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Apparently Cracked has beaten time itself too, since this article was posted on the author's blog just four days ago.

    6. Re:How to make $3.50 online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When page layout was literally cutting-and-pasting, people would pinch the paper scraps onto a clipboard to not lose them. So whatever you "cut" was saved to the virtual "clipboard". Some software actually used a Paste Jar as the icon, but that was already an "old person icon" even back in the 1990s.

      And yeah, the blog author made an interesting point (with some dumb examples), so I will take the discussion over the inarticulate slashdorks complainers and their lame "old person" 1990s south park jokes.

    7. Re:How to make $3.50 online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. Be the Loch Ness Monster
      2. Cunningly disguise yourself as a celebrity - a famous rapper, for example
      3. Approach people, explaining that P.Diddy need tree fiddy
      4. ???
      5. Profit!

    8. Re:How to make $3.50 online by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're saying is that the author is a plagiarist (from March 26, 2011)?

    9. Re:How to make $3.50 online by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Maybe they both plagiarized this article. Or maybe articles like these are just older than any of us and multiple people can write their own without plagiarizing anyone.

    10. Re:How to make $3.50 online by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Mmmm Vibram Fivefingers. If I were sportier, I'd be all up in that bidniss. Them things are perversely comfortable.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    11. Re:How to make $3.50 online by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Don't tell anyone, but yea, I did read the damned thing, to the very end. It's like being at a bar, and some skinny blue-collar trainwreck starts chatting your ear off. Your fist wants to shut him up, but your brain wants to continue laughing at this guy's self-righteous hyperbole. Basically applying the Dunning-Kruger effect in entertainment form.

      That guy is Scott Hanselman.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  12. Leave the icons alone by Metricmouse · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The dollar sign is thought to be a slash through an eight representing 'pieces of eight', an older Spanish currency denomination, but everyone still knows what $ means. Icons that everyone is used to and that can be recognized as to their function should be left alone, for efficiency and a nice little piece of nostalgia.

    1. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The dollar sign is supposed to be a U (as in "United") overlaid on an S (as in "States"). The U is tall and skinny. The S is of normal size and shape. And since the tall, skinny U doesn't fit within a proper line height, the bottom gets cut off.

      Later, the glyph was simplified and one of the vertical bars was removed. Probably by a typewriter manufacturer. Early computer systems kept up the tradition of being sloppy about such things. More recent systems just keep it around for "compatibility".

    2. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that was a later adaptation of the $ to the US thing but thats all rumor
      I mean just look up history of the $ geesh. GOOGLE much?

    3. Re:Leave the icons alone by AgNO3 · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    4. Re:Leave the icons alone by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      everyone still knows what $ means.

      Yes! $ is the sigil for scalars. It is also used for strings in BASIC.

    5. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great find and interesting reading, thanks. (out of mod points)

    6. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1

      The Dollar sign is a picture of the Pillars of Hercules with a ribbon around them. It symbolises "the end of the known world". The word Dollar is a horrible pun on Dinar (abbreviation of Denarius, Latin for a tenth of a pound) and Dolour, (meaning "grief").

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    7. Re:Leave the icons alone by Metricmouse · · Score: 3, Interesting

      NOPE. Some excerpts from YOUR link... "One might expect that the origins of the sign would also be known for certain particularly when the origin of the British pound sign, £, which is far older, is well-established. However that is not the case with regard to the dollar." "There is another version of the theory linking the sign to the Spanish peso. As mentioned earlier the peso was subdivided into eight reals, hence the name piece of eight.The 8 with two strokes became a letter S with two strokes since S looks like an 8 that has been split, as when a peso was broken to provide change in reals. Eventually a further simplification was introduced by dropping one of the strokes." Read YFA.

    8. Re:Leave the icons alone by zAPPzAPP · · Score: 1

      No no,
      $ is obviously short for 'soft'.

      At least that's how it's used around here I think.

    9. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thaler

    10. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Take a class in text comprehension; the article supports GP.
      Also, every search for a corroboration of the "$ means US" theory leads back to Ayn Rand, who gives no credible support. I think she just made it up.

    11. Re:Leave the icons alone by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I thought that is the symbol for installing an electrical socket in that location. It's on all the building wiring blueprints that way.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Did you even read the article you linked to?

    13. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "U.S. Dollar" sign has two strokes, not one.

    14. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the deal with slashdot posts starting with the word "wrong" in all caps? It's like you can't contain your aspergers or something.

    15. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is he "WRONG"? An 8 with a slash is theory #3 in the article that you yourself posted.

    16. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That site you link also gives the pieces of 8 theory.

    17. Re:Leave the icons alone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter whether GP's theory is right or wrong; he's correct in that the dollar sign cannot derive from U overlaid on S, for the simple reason that it predates the formation of the United States.

    18. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WRONG

      Which is funny, as $ being based on broken pieces of eight actually is one of the theories listed as a possible origin for the symbol (if you know, actually read that site.)

      Slashdot: where your sources contradict your message.

      On topic, it really doesn't matter what the icons are or mean as long as you and the designer agree on what they mean. Icons, like all documentation and User Interfaces, are communication between the writer and the user.

      Excuse me, but I have a phonograph that needs use of my wrench to tune some settings. Please watch out for the grass.

    19. Re:Leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Har har har matey. Ye be wrong ye dope head

  13. Radio Buttons by Moridineas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel stupid saying this, but before reading this blurb (I refuse to click the link and give this guy hits), I never made the connection that radio buttons were from the old push-down / pop-up radio buttons.

    Which just goes to show, iconography or UI elements don't have to have a connection to something commonly used or known to be understood. I've been able to use radio buttons fine for decades without realizing what the historical antecedent was.

    Besides, who today hasn't seen a clipboard, bookmark, calendar, manila folder, magnifying glass, binocular, envelope, wrench or gears, microphone, photograph, or television? I'm willing to go out on a limb and say that in 50 years, all those things will still exist and still be commonly known. Most of those things are necessary as long as being a human still involves interacting with the physical world in some way. I don't think books will disappear, and I don't think tablets will end paper. Even if the devices themselves change (ie, binocular or magnifying glass into a unified electric optical device?), the analog remains.

    Address Books and handset phones are likely to be things of the past, carbon copies pretty rare (though still very common today), and blue prints probably in the dustbin of history. If we got rid of "carbon copy" what would we rename the CC field to? "Other addresses that this message should go to, but not be the primary recipient of?" And BCC?

    1. Re:Radio Buttons by houghi · · Score: 1

      I feel stupid saying this, but before reading this blurb [...], I never made the connection that radio buttons were from the old push-down / pop-up radio buttons.

      This is not stupid. This shows why the article is stupid.

      Everybody knows what the radiation icon is, yet it does not look like that in reality. Icons are there to make it clear in one look what it means.

      Replacing them will mean that people have two signs/icons to remember and then change them again in 20 years, so there are 3 sets to remember? That will add to the confusion.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    2. Re:Radio Buttons by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Blueprints are still very common, they just aren't "blue" anymore and are are printed with plotters by CADD designers instead of hand-drawn with onion paper and T-squares (though those are still common in some places). Also, is carbon paper REALLY still used? Then closest I've seen in use in the last 5-10 years is the carbon-less copy paper you see triplicate-forms made with (blue/yellow/pink pages).

    3. Re:Radio Buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am 36 year old and have used the radio buttons but started UI programming very late when the radios already had more advanced controls. Now that you mentioned I realized what the real radio buttons are.

      The radio button is so easy concept but also too simple to exploit: having all options visible and choosing just one from the group. There was a time when electronic devices had one button for one option, just because there was less amount of options available (now submenus and graphics etc. are used). Now the trend is not to have too many options visible at the same time.

      Understanding this historical background makes it easier to understand the radio button concept.

    4. Re:Radio Buttons by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "Also, is carbon paper REALLY still used?"

      yes, go to any warehouse and their picker dot matrix printer.

      They still make dot matrix printers!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:Radio Buttons by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      carbon-less copy paper

      How do you make paper without carbon?

      Sorry I couldn't resist. :)

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Radio Buttons by Nethead · · Score: 1

      To be technical, my laser print is dot-matrix, just lots of dots. The only non-matrix printers that I can recall were line-printers, Selectrics (I had one with RS-232, now THAT was a terminal) and the daisy-wheel. I guess that pen-plotters could be a subgroup.

      But yeah, Okidata FTW!

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    7. Re:Radio Buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not the only stupid one... I have developped software for 15 years and just last week I learnt where "radio buttons" came from. Never thought of it (I just knew they were called "radio buttons", but never made a connection).

    8. Re:Radio Buttons by graphius · · Score: 1

      I recently took a business writing course, and the textbook said that cc meant "copy circulated".

      If you don't like carbon copy you should say "computer copy" or something....

    9. Re:Radio Buttons by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      Very interesting, I had not heard that before.

    10. Re:Radio Buttons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I see you looked at the headings and the pictures but didn't actually read any of the text.

      Magnifying glasses and binoculars are both still around, but they're used the wrong way around in icons, as the text points out.

      Microphones are still around, but the styles used in icons aren't the kind most people recognise, as the text points out.

      Televisions don't have rabbit-ear aerials any more, as the text points out.

      There are lots of photographs around, but icons tend to specifically show Polaroid ones, which are long-obsolete. As the text points out.

      Good job on the reading comprehension.

  14. Hurray Captain Obvious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but the summary tells it like the icons will be ancient glyphs.

  15. If you don't know what a screwdriver is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should just top yourself, becuase you're a fucking loser.

  16. What the hell is this blog spam? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um, what?

    This is one of the most horrible posts (not saying "article" because it's not- it's just a giant diatribe) I've ever seen on Slashdot. Why the hell is this shit on the front page?

    I'm a graphics designer for a living (yes, I live off the income generated from my work). Reading this crap makes me think that this guy is either trolling or too goddam moronic to comprehend what he's trying to talk about. I haven't seen a floppy disk "save" icon in ages, radio buttons are NOT ICONS (they're widgets- it's like comparing a scroll bar to an icon- it's not, it's a goddam scrollbar), and I don't know what his beef is with everything else.

    If he's so goddam brilliant, why isn't he offering suitable replacements instead of just saying "lol is teh sux0r 4 old people 4 sure1111111"?

    Oh, wait, he thinks we should replace folders with giant abstract squares. That'll totally look better then a manilla folder for sure. Just look at the public outrage Adobe's icons cause every successive release- they've gone from those nice pre-CS icons (like the feather for Photoshop- what was up with that? Who cares, it looked good) to squares. With letters. In horrible colours with the complexity of something drawn in MS Paint.

    I suppose in his ideal computing world, everything is that ugly. No thanks, I'll stick with my modern OS.

    -AC

    1. Re:What the hell is this blog spam? by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      I haven't seen a floppy disk "save" icon in ages

      Yet I see, and use, it every day.

      It's in excel and all that.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  17. FAIL?!? by Y2K+is+bogus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I read the article I felt like the world at large has failed. With the resurgence of the DIY genre, why do the young ones have to be ignorant of history? It seems like the intention is to forget all that came before, so nobody can have an original idea. The irony is that many great, original, ideas are a rehash of some previous idea because it was the best way to do something.

    As someone who grew up using floppies, building computers, learning to program, and finally leaving that arena to explore a career in one of the oldest professions, metalworking, I have a particular spot for history and nostalgia.

    Just because every 14 year old kid has an ARM A5 processor strapped to them doesn't mean the lessons that were learned in the 80's, innovating computers and electronics, aren't just as applicable today.

    I feel it takes an appreciation for the classical trades and the way things *were* done, to truly appreciate what we have -- and apply the hard won principles of yesteryear to tomorrow.

    Sure, those icons stand for concepts that we rarely use today, but many of them were "obsolete" when they were invented. Further, what would we replace them with, what are the analogues today that people will unmistakebly associate those actions with? What, two fingers making a V? How about a curly swipey gesture?

    The world is full of things past and present, let's not throw them away because the "future" beckons "futuristic" notions.

    1. Re:FAIL?!? by cowtamer · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up -- I could not have said it better.

      And, while you're at it -- get off our collective lawn!

    2. Re:FAIL?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame the parents who want everything to be easy for children.

      Can't have them doing hard stuff now, can we? They might get frustrated! Let's just get rid of all the hard stuff.
      God forbid they come across a hilly street, can't make them walk all the way up that now can we? That would just be cruel! Let's smash all hills to pieces.
      And so on, and so on.

      This has had a knock-on effect that appears to have been exponential in scaling.

      But also blame the people who work in various industries that have enforced in to their products a "old is bad" mentality.
      Clothes, tech, anything. The older it is, the worse it is, even if the thing is completely capable of working.

      The way I see it right now is a 30 year old hammering a nail bent because he never eased it in and probably even smashed his own finger to pieces.
      Can't use a nailgun without power. I feel anything based on kinetic energy are going to become a lost art in 50 years.

    3. Re:FAIL?!? by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Nobody said we should throw them away. You're putting words in his month.

    4. Re:FAIL?!? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      With the resurgence of the DIY genre, why do the young ones have to be ignorant of history?

      The author is 38. I'm pretty sure he has seen the floppies and the folders firsthand.

  18. Meh by wiegeabo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This article might have been interesting if it had actually suggested replacement icons.

    But just pointing out that they're old?

    It doesn't matter that their old, everyone that uses them knows what the icons mean because they've 'always' meant that. And those that don't just use menus.

    1. Re:Meh by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      save : a box with an arrow going from outside of the box to inside, small dot on the end of the arrow that is outside.
      load: arrow the other way.

      much better than mocking people with a floppy disk icon on platforms with no disk drives or accessible filesystems!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Meh by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      That might be because it's not actually an article, it's a blog post.

  19. Alternatives Lacking by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Indeed, it's easy to complain, but difficult to offer real alternatives. Our world is increasingly non-physical such that there are few if any replacement images these days. So it seems you have 3 choices:

    1. Use old-fashioned ideas
    2. Use new-fashioned ones, which are either confusingly abstract or don't exist.
    3. Don't use icons, period.

    Most people recognize images faster than words (once learned), so 3 is out.

    So let's see what you have with #2 before we toss #1. Show them or put up.

    1. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iOS designers seem to love #2 mystery meat icons, which is frustrating at times.

      (insert number two joke here)

    2. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      Most people recognize images faster than words (once learned), so 3 is out.

      IMHO, that is a fail. Most people have not the slightest idea what the icons are, because they are too damn small, and have to mouse-over to get at the text. The entire problem goes away if you use text in the first place. (Literate people can recognise single words every bit as fast as pictures),

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    3. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. For well over a decade now I've been setting up my Unix GUIs and apps to be as close to a pure text mode as I can get them. I've found it's just as fast to navigate as icons but without the ambiguity. And like parent said, many times you end up mousing over the icon to read the tooltip to make sure it's the right one anyway (you'd be surprised how many times you do this without really thinking about it - so why not just have the text there to begin with?).

    4. Re:Alternatives Lacking by swalve · · Score: 1

      Words, yes. Picking out the right word in a string of buttons with other words, not so much.

    5. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly! when the great programmer wrote the first 'save' routine and needed an icon he said what current old world technology most closely matches this function. hmm... writing data to semi-permanent storage.... hm.... i guess chiseling words into a clay tablet is pretty close. when other people see this it should be pretty clear to any one familiar with early sumerian culture. or perhaps i could just use an icon that shows what it is doing -- writing bytes to a (floppy) disk. i am sorry we moving on from clay tablets and floppy disks.

      speaking of confusing abstract how about the low tire pressure warning lights? i havent seen one yet that reminds me of a tire.

      obligitory car analogy, how about that check engine light. no engine looks like that light yet people generally know what it means. how about electric vehicles should they replace the engine icon with an electric motor and battery (whatever they look like)?

    6. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Once people get use to a picture, regardless of the content of the picture, it tends to stand out faster than words. This is my experience and observation, and your experience may differ. Without some kind of careful study, we have to go on anecdotal info here.

      Plus, not everyone using the software knows English, and a picture may help them guess/remember.

    7. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      An open yellowish folder with an arrow into it may be a decent "Save" icon; at least better than a floppy.

    8. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Timewasted · · Score: 1

      IMHO, that is a fail... (Literate people can recognise single words every bit as fast as pictures),

      Literate people tend to use their language correctly as well. Hence, icons are prefect for you!

    9. Re:Alternatives Lacking by FoolishOwl · · Score: 1

      Alternately, you could try using larger icons. Then a whole lot of people on Slashdot and elsewhere complain that your user interface looks "childish".

    10. Re:Alternatives Lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of them would not complain as long as they are suitably size-adjustable, so they can be set to the size that balances the screen usage against how easy they are to hit with the mouse and distinguish from other icons.

  20. It doesn't actually matter! by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It doesn't actually matter if a kid has never seen a reel-to-reel tape player. The thing about symbols is, eventually they can stop being metaphors and start to have meaning in *themselves*.

    Take for example the ampersand, &. It's a stylized, abbreviated form of the Latin word "et", meaning "and". You probably didn't know that, but you don't need to know Latin to understand that & means "and". The Latin letter "B" comes from the Phoenecian letter "bet" which also means "house", possibly because the letter once looked a bit like one. At this point the symbol is so far removed from its origin that we're not sure, but nobody cares. The Japanese katakana and hiragana writing systems work in a similar way: they're simplified versions of characters derived from Chinese symbols, and originally represented a word that starts with a certain sound. But now they just stand for the sound itself.

    The same thing is happening with icons. 200 years from now, nobody will know what magnetic tape was, but so long as my new phone uses the same symbol for "voicemail" that my last one did, I'll be able to use it just fine.

    1. Re:It doesn't actually matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The same thing is happening with icons. 200 years from now, nobody will know what magnetic tape was, but so long as my new phone uses the same symbol for "voicemail" that my last one did, I'll be able to use it just fine.

      I don't care how great the iPhone 204 will be, I still don't think a dead man can use it.

    2. Re:It doesn't actually matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading comprehension.
      You fail it. In no part of that did he insinuate that he'd be alive in 200 years. He only made a statement about the future and a separate statement about a future phone he's planning on getting. Yeah, its a run-on sentence, but it shouldn't have thrown you off that much.

    3. Re:It doesn't actually matter! by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      Nah, he's right, I was implying I'd be around in 200 years. I hear that's going to be a new feature with the iPhone 8, Immortality Edition.

    4. Re:It doesn't actually matter! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I was pondering this question last week as I was at work and making a save feature for a part of a program I'm working on. I needed a save icon and I didn't want to use the floppy disk because no one saves to floppies anymore.
      But I realized that any other icon would serve the purpose less than a floppy icon mainly because that's what people are used to. If you keep changing icons to "keep up with the times" then they loose familiarity and fail to serve their purpose of communicating to people quickly that "this button does this thing".

      Also you have to keep in mind that icons started out as a way to connect the "real" action with the "virtual" action. Like using the wrench icon to mean go into settings much like you might grab your wrench before popping the hood on your car and "tweaking it's settings". But as things become more and more virtual and further divorced from reality icons make less sense this way.

      Take saving for example, what icon should be used? A floppy disk, a thumb drive, a microSD card, they all imply what you are saving them to. You could even use the icon for a hard drive though it looks more like a tin can and isn't all that helpful. The truth is we don't have a mental image of the "thing" to which it is being saved, it's just this metaphysical place were patterns of information is stored. To use a modern mindset there really is no image that would accurately depict the save icon.
      Kind of makes you wonder about the future of icons and why the metro style UI is growing in popularity, because they world we work in isn't real enough to have accurate icons.

    5. Re:It doesn't actually matter! by EvilIdler · · Score: 1

      You should have clarified that. The Immortality Edition doesn't give people eternal life because of Apple being godlike, although they are, but because mobile providers find it a necessity with their eternal contracts.

  21. Radio buttons by Osgeld · · Score: 1

    What happens when you hit 2 at the same time in 2012? one action, the first you hit, so radio buttons still apply, you choose one, just like on your radio

    Clipboards? anyone who doesnt sit at a desk all fucking day making up tripe articles has a use for a clipboard

    Bookmarks? why is this on the list, do you have a better way to mark a book?

    Spiral bound is strange? shit man someone better tell wallmart, they have an entire isle of them, and its often difficult to find college rule cause they sell out

    Manila Folders? really dude? theres arguments over who gets the last couple folders in any workplace that actually has to keep up with paperwork, though it may be strange to you since your just writing on some yippy blog, and have nothing like sales or accounting

    Envelopes, yea go drop a hundred bucks in cash in the night deposit or rent box with the slip attached via paperclip, see how far that gets you, again still relevant

    Screwdrivers are something a 20 something has never seen? for fucks sake your really stretching, most put together cheap furniture that 20 somethings would buy for their party pad comes with one

    Micophones, yea you are correct, that should be replaced with a "-", much clearer and mimics modern life to boot

    Photography ... I dont know where your stretching to see this, windows shows me the picture in a box, paint has a artist pallet and brush, must be some mac crap or hippy linux nonsense

    "Does your TV have "rabbit ears?"" why yes it does asswipe, its called DTV, it shows me the news and weather for free

    "I'll "cc" you on that email. Last time I made a carbon copy I was using a mimeograph to do it". No you didnt mimeographs used a wet chemical process, and last time I bought a car, eh 2006 everything printed was on carbon paper, my time sheets are on carbon paper, and many workorders / receipts are on carbon paper

  22. OLD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For once, this comment is appropriate.

  23. What's new? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Symbols are passed on and re-purposed all the time.

    Just because the Medici family isn't all that these days doesn't mean the 3 balls aren't still the symbol for pawn broker.

    Or what about that cross for Christianity? These modern day kids haven't seen any crucifixions lately. How will they relate? Might want to throw out Lady Justice and her scales along with the Caduceus while we are at it.

    The bad ones will die off (voice mail is particularly unintuitive), the others live on just because they are distinctive. Abstract Square, not so much.

    1. Re:What's new? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Abstract Square, not so much.

      Actually, abstract squares have been a pretty persistent representation for "stop", along with the abstract triangle for "play", and the abstract parallel lines for "pause" (which, these days, is often synonymous with stop anyway). This just goes to support your argument though - these abstractions do not graphically represent anything; their meaning is solely derived from their common, consistent use.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    2. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am old fart myself (36 year old) who has used 8 inch, 5.25 inch and 3.5 inch floppies. I know many people who have used 3.5 version only. But I know none who have used 8 inch versions. For many people the "reality" is about the stuff they can relate to.

      For me, these formats still remain in my active memory when I browse some computer museum web site. The new generation has never seen a floppy disk. Icon of a floppy doesn't symbolize a real floppy. Christianity is based on the crucifixion but "personal computing" is not. The concept of personal computing is constantly changing (and it's not a church).

      Adding an icon for floppy never makes the new generation understand what the symbol is. But it helps make the older generation get nostalgic.

    3. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or what about that cross for Christianity? These modern day kids haven't seen any crucifixions lately. How will they relate? Might want to throw out Lady Justice and her scales along with the Caduceus while we are at it.

      Interesting you should mention Caduceus.

      the staff carried by Hermes in Greek mythology. The same staff was also borne by heralds in general, for example by Iris, the messenger of Hera. It is a short staff entwined by two serpents, sometimes surmounted by wings. In Roman iconography it was often depicted being carried in the left hand of Mercury, the messenger of the gods, guide of the dead and protector of merchants, shepherds, gamblers, liars, and thieves.

      ...

      The caduceus is sometimes mistakenly used as a symbol of medicine and/or medical practice, especially in North America, because of widespread confusion with the traditional medical symbol, the rod of Asclepius, which has only a single snake and no wings.

      The symbol of liars, thieves, gamblers and merchants but not so much for medicine. An ironically appropriate mistake really.

    4. Re:What's new? by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the square/triangle/lines thing is actually from tactile days when you felt what button you were pressing on the walkman hanging behind you on your belt.

      Or probably earlier on something else I cannot recall.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
    5. Re:What's new? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Or what about that cross for Christianity? These modern day kids haven't seen any crucifixions lately. How will they relate?

      That's the strangest, since the Romans themselves didn't really use crosses but a "T"-shaped torture device, and Christ, if he indeed existed at the time reported by the gospels, would have been crucified on a "T"-shaped post.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    6. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is older than Walkman. The triangle is arrowhead showing the tape direction, block is the stop and pause is the "ri" character of Japanese language meaning pause.

    7. Re:What's new? by Jesus_C_of_Nazareth · · Score: 1

      True, and I personally find it a bit creepy that they took that to be the symbol of my religion. Incidentally, I'm definitely not the blond haired guy of fair complexion, with blue eyes, well groomed face and a fairly snappy wardrobe that most modern Christians know. My appearance, like the most common understandings of hell, owes more to later writers and artists than to the reality of my day or my teachings. I think most Christians, on seeing me walking towards them, would cross the street.

      --
      JC
    8. Re:What's new? by Lunzo · · Score: 1

      The lower case t for the Christian cross is because the Romans hung a sign above his head saying 'king of the Jews'. Clearly Jesus couldn't have been crucified on a capital T shaped cross if there's a sign above his head.

  24. Agism? by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where's the "And git off my lawn!" icon when you need it.

    1. Re:Agism? by Steauengeglase · · Score: 1

      Reel mower?

    2. Re:Agism? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      Shotgun.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    3. Re:Agism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $ git off my lawn
      git: 'off' is not a git command. See 'git --help'.

      Did you mean this?
                      diff

    4. Re:Agism? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There's no icon for that - if you actually have icons in your UI, you're not old enough, and hence not qualified to invoke it in the first place.

  25. Started off strong, but... by XiaoMing · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What the shit kind of haphazard article was this?
    I can see how the fast pace of technological evolution can make other things seem glacial, but some of those things were a fucking stretch beyond measure.

    Does he think we already live in a paperless society?
    Because clipboards, manila folders, envelopes, and calendars all still exist and are commonplace.

    And taking issue with binoculars and magnifying glasses? I guess as a technologically advanced people, we've replaced basic optics with what, psychic powers to conveniently amplify the size of things for our comprehension?
    He goes on to make a statement about how they are confusing and whatnot (no they aren't, Sherlock Holmes used a magnifying glass to search for clues and shit), but how does that even deal with his preface of the article, which is about anachronism?

    And I can see how the phone's silhouette is one that isn't QUITE the most modern thing... but honestly what would you update it with? A little metal rectangle to represent the candy-bar phones we have now? Honestly the next best thing is probably the Motorola-Brick, which is iconic as a cell-phone, but existed concurrently with those phone silhouettes anyway.

    Other no-duh's include Studio mics (vs. what else would you use? A pinhole to represent the integrated mic in a webcam?), and who the fuck doesn't recognize a gear or a screwdriver as the innards of something?

    And finally, regarding

    I suspect my voicemail is no longer stored on spooled magnetic tape

    given http://searchdatamanagement.rl.techtarget.co.uk/detail/RES/1320101138_161.html that article, I'm not so sure this guy even understands the world beyond just what he himself specifically sees and touches.

    Basically, he tried to justify a full blown article based on his observation of: Floppies, and Radio Buttons.

    1. Re:Started off strong, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about some standardized symbol for "audio in"? Of course there will be misconceptions when symbolizing a particular "instance" of the real (or obsolete/rare) hardware.

  26. Most of that article was rubbish by caywen · · Score: 1

    What the article almost implies is that it's silly and outdated to represent today's abstract computing concepts with icons of physical items. What then, to represent them with? I agree that some of the items need to evolve to use more modern objects (e.g. the floppy disk). But when a visual representation is needed, almost by definition the visual needs to represent something either physical, or a widely accepted glyph (e.g. a question mark, or a star).

    What would be a better icon for saving a file? How about a diagram of a function being called that opens an I/O api that causes the file system to start writing bits at a particular sector and track using a magnetic head? Oh wait, with SSD's that's already outdated. Ok, how about a pictogram of an SSD drive? Oh wait, it looks like a nondescript box with chips inside.

    Perhaps Microsoft is actually onto the ultimate solution to all this: maybe icons themselves need to go. Maybe the UI should just say "Save".

  27. Makes perfect sense to me by blandcramration · · Score: 3

    The person that wrote this acts as if no one under 30 has ever seen any of these objects; to say so is completely ludicrous. I'm 28 and I have used floppy discs since I was 7, I've spoken on a telephone (over a cellphone) for most of my life, I've driven an older car with radio buttons, and I read books and like to keep my place. To assume anyone under 30 doesn't use tools, remember when polaroid went out of business, or owned a calendar is completely ignorant. Does everyone over 30 automatically have specific knowledge of these things? Does this make everyone under 30 completely ignorant to anything produced prior to the 1990s? Fuck off.

    1. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm only 21 and I've used most of the things you're describing. Floppy disks, older-style telephones, etc. And bookmarks? Seriously? I still use those today. So does anybody else who reads a book (which I do understand is a sadly dwindling number...).

      The ONLY icon I didn't understand the history of was radio buttons. But honestly, what would we replace them with? And who needs to understand the history of an icon to understand what happens when you click it?

    2. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Now, that car you drove, did it have a little picture of a glass bulb-and-tube thermometer on the dashboard, possibly next to a little warning light or on the dial of a gauge? Now, when have you *ever* used a thermometer to measure the coolant temperature in a car? Assuming you're not doing some extremely specific tests on the cooling system.

      It gets worse, though. My car has no fewer than three little thermometer warning lights. One has a wavy line across it to show it's for water temperature (because it looks like waves on the sea, which is water, presumably). One has a little drop beside it - what the hell is that? Oh, it's oil temperature, and it blinks if you give it the berries when the oil is cold and comes on steady if the oil gets too hot. The final one has a pair of gears beside it. Gearbox temperature? No, hydraulic oil temperature, with the gears symbolising a gear pump - odd, since it actually uses a swashplate pump but I guess that's harder to do in a little white icon on a red lamp cover.

      The one thing they have in common is that if they light up, another red warning lamp twice the size with the word "STOP" written on it comes up as well.

      I think the worst example of an icon I saw on a piece of software was some radio GPS locator stuff. When it was trying to connect to the radio it showed a little animated icon of a plug going into a socket, over and over - cheesy, but I guess it makes the point.

      What totally baffled me about it was this - if it couldn't connect to the radio the icon changed to a guy with a black-and-white striped shirt waving his arms. Now, since the software was pretty crap this happened quite a lot. "Aw, no, it's gone stripey-shirt-guy" was the frequent complaint.

      It was only months later that I mentioned this to someone at the company that produced the software, a company somewhere in the US. "Oh, that means it's timed out", the guy said.
      "Really? How do you figure that?"
      "Ah well it's a baseball umpire signalling time out, you see, having the icons saves having to translate all the error messages"

      Yeah, maybe it works in the US, but in the rest of the world where no-one plays baseball it falls over pretty badly.

    3. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      My favorite is the "dispense bacon button" but it's always broken or out of bacon on my car.

      http://www.flickr.com/photos/mag3737/1337909712/

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Makes perfect sense to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because you've misinterpreted the icon. Notice that the 'bacon flow arrows' are pointing *into* the box. That means you car wants you to feed *it* bacon. It's hungry, dude!

  28. Drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the most absurd news post I've read on Slashdot in a while. In fact, it's bad enough that I'm bothering to leave my first comment in nearly a decade.

    The multitude of comments asserting that these metaphors are still valid are by-and-large correct. Of course, people have used floppy disks in ages, but who doesn't implicitly know what that icon means?

    If an icon conveys intention, purpose, and shared understanding; it is effective.

    What drivel.

    1. Re:Drivel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the point with bad symbols. The new generation has never used a floppy so they have to either ask around the "obsolete" people about useless stuf or google it (googling by just picture is harder). "Computer museum history" is some specialist expert area, the average Joe knows that as well as the history of feminist quotes.

  29. Skeuomorphism by Sarusa · · Score: 4, Informative

    The term is 'skeumorph' - it's like a wheel with decorative spokes. The wheel no longer needs them for strength, but they're there because a wheel 'needs' spokes.

    The other obvious one is camera apps making a shutter sound.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skeuomorph

    1. Re:Skeuomorphism by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Thank you!

      That post was of more value than the rest of the thread.

      Now I'll have some fun looking for skeumorphism.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Skeuomorphism by epp_b · · Score: 1

      The other obvious one is camera apps making a shutter sound.

      Wrong. A shutter sound is not merely nostalgic. Digital SLRs still have a physical shutter and mirror box so you can look right through the lens. Using the LCD for a live image, when a real viewfinder is an option, is stupid, cumbersome, slow and power-consuming. This is why all those new "mirrorless" cameras are annoying to use.

      True, a phone or pocket camera doesn't technically need to make a sound when capturing an image, but it really is the best way of indicating capture (your eyes are busy looking the screen). Alternatively, for a phone, it could give a little vibration jolt (a la haptic feedback).

      Also, I'd love to see how a bike wheel would work without spokes.

    3. Re:Skeuomorphism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The shutter sound is to stop people taking silent upskirts of women

    4. Re:Skeuomorphism by Sarusa · · Score: 1

      Hmm, let me make this nice and simple for you.

      If it does something that is functional, such as an SLR making a shutter noise or a normal spoked bicycle wheel having spokes, then it is not skeumorphic.

      If you have a camera that has no shutter making shutter noises, or molded decorative spokes on the side of an automobile tire that no longer needs them, simply because people expect new tech to behave like old tech, it's skeumorphic.

      Is that so hard? If I say 'some A are B' this does not mean all A are B and you are terribly clever if you can come up with an example. It's implied.

      Finally: Bike wheels without spokes: https://encrypted.google.com/search?q=spokeless+bicycle+wheel

  30. Nothing new by pthisis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is nothing new. We still talk about pencil lead even though it's been graphite since Roman times, bands cutting new tracks though wax recording is long past, calculus though we don't count with stones, and dialing phones though the rotary phone is nearly extinct. "Pump the brakes" has enjoyed a renaissance of popularity as a slang phrase despite antilock brakes being universal, and people still go balls to the wall or run out of steam.

    It's more important that these icons and idioms are standard and well-understood than that people remember their origins.

    --
    rage, rage against the dying of the light
    1. Re:Nothing new by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 1

      You' re piping hot on this one! (steam kettles)

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    2. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Universal? I own a 2004 model car that does not have ABS, and in many parts of the US it is still quite common to see cars from the 70s on the road, generally being driven by young people because they can't afford any better. Pumping the brakes is a technique that a very significant number of drivers still need to be aware of. You're making the same kind of bad assumptions as the article.

    3. Re:Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Pump the brakes" has enjoyed a renaissance of popularity as a slang phrase despite antilock brakes being universal

      Bad example. In 2010, 11% of vehicles sold still had power brakes. Even incredibly common cars, like the Cobalt and Mustang, didn't have ABS standard. Through the 2000's, it was closer to 20% - which is important, since the average vehicle is ~11 years old. So, roughly one out of five cars doesn't have ABS. That's far from "universal".

  31. Icons are NOUNS, Menus are VERBS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most icons don't make sense, that's because they're NOUNS when they represent actions that are VERBS.

    Let me give you a simple example, 'paste' is the act of pasting stuff into a document, yet its presented as a clipboard icon. Save, he covered the floppy disk, but even if it was a hard disk, the action is *saving* from memory to disk, yet the button shows the disk, not the act. It could equally apply to 'load' from disk since there's no arrow indicating the direction usually these days.

    It gets worse when complex menu items are replaced by single icons, the menu might say "Do [this] to [that] using [tool-mode]" and that has to be condensed down to a single picture in a rectangle with no flow. Language flows left to right in English, things at the right occur later than things at the left, whereas in icons, everything is in a square and has no time flow.

    This is why the Microsoft ribbon is so bad, all those icons trying to represent complex underlying actions and all of them vague and confusing.

    So sure the out of date icons are bad, but then they were never good in the first place.

    1. Re:Icons are NOUNS, Menus are VERBS by allo · · Score: 1

      don't you know the icons with the floppy and the green/red arrow?

  32. Double-reverse-getoffmylawn-irony by fongaboo · · Score: 2

    In a case of double-reverse-getoffmylawn-irony, the author is apparently too old to understand that Instagram icon is capitalizing on the very real nostalgia by hipster twenty-somethings for Polaroid cameras. This kind of retro-enthusiasm is very selective though. Recently I had a friend chastise another friend on why he would have an interest in vintage computers. Later that day, when visiting said friend's abode, I discovered an Atari 2600 configured with a SynthCart that allowed him to manipulate it as a retro-new-wave electronic instrument.

  33. Under the hood by fongaboo · · Score: 1

    BTW... Thanks to Obama's bailout of the auto industry, wrenches and gears are still made use of 'under the hood' in more than a figurative sense... and it's still quite lucrative to do so.

  34. Icons are symbols by Hymer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Icons work because we have learned what the symbol means not because the symbol makes sense. Red Cross and the biohazard sign are examples of this.
    If you change the symbol you have to learn everybody the meaning of the new symbol instead of just learning children the meaning of the old one.
    Furthermore you don't have any guarantee that the shiny new symbol will be meaningful in a couple of years.

    1. Re:Icons are symbols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often enough "everybody" means "everybody in the world", though the iconized object wasn't used throughout the world.

    2. Re:Icons are symbols by Nethead · · Score: 1

      The biohazard symbol was the tracing of a 7" reel-to-reel spindle. The radiation symbol is a 10" reel-to-reel spindle.

      Obvious to anyone that was an AV geek in the 70s.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  35. This is going to sound kind of mean by lightknight · · Score: 1

    This is going to sound kind of mean, but tell them to adapt. You have perhaps a dozen icons to memorize that represent 90% of the operations you will ever need to perform on a computer; and there really aren't any viable replacements. Who uses Read / Write media today? What would be considered universal? A thumb drive? The 'cloud'? Who here owns a rewritable DVD, or Blu-Ray?

    This is a problem that simply doesn't exist.

    --
    I am John Hurt.
    1. Re:This is going to sound kind of mean by tricorn · · Score: 1

      Actually, many places ARE starting to use a "cloud" symbol to mean various things. In the Apple App Store or iTunes, they show a Cloud to mean you've purchased something but it isn't on your computer, so you can download it from "The Cloud". Now, what the heck some curly lines have to do with a server farm connected over a network that eventually gets to me through a complex radio-wave system I'm not sure...wait, are clouds obsolete too?

      I've also seen a "cloud with arrow pointing to it" to mean "Save". Wait, an "arrow"? Weren't those pointy things that were used to kill animals and people and win archery contests? What do those have to do with "Save"? In 10 years, when the whole concept of "The Cloud" has been dead for a while, will such an icon even make any sense at all (maybe it will make more sense to put up a square with grid marks in it, to represent "The Matrix").

      Let's get rid of arrows completely while we're at it, how many people still use arrows in every day life, and what do they have to do with directions anyway?

  36. Summary misleading... by snowgirl · · Score: 2

    TFS is misleading... the things you complain about are only complained about in aspects.

    <karma-whoring>

    Magnifying Glasses vs. Binoculars... he suggests that these icons should have been switched
    Televisions... he complains about the "rabbit ears" aspect of many iconic renditions

    The other two are just assuming that no one touches the tools anymore because they're not widely wielded anymore.

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  37. Symbols can out-last Objects by Copley · · Score: 1

    The meaning of a symbol can extend way beyond the lifetime of the object it is based on.

    In the UK the sign for a speed camera shows a Hasselblad-type bellows camera, not because these cameras are in common use, but because the symbol is highly-recognisable when travelling along a road at speed - much more so that a generic, rectangular digital camera symbol would be.

    (Plus, with OSs like iOS, the concept of manually 'saving' a document is almost redundant - the average Joe is moving to systems where documents are simply created and then auto-magically sync'd to some central cloudy place)

    --
    I am bald
    1. Re:Symbols can out-last Objects by goodmanj · · Score: 1

      I absolutely agree with your point, but my god, does that UK speed camera icon suck. Symbols can outlast objects, but the symbol should *start out* looking like a familiar object in use when the symbol is created. If you removed the text, the "speed camera" icon would be incomprehensible to me. A front-view 35mm camera would be a much better choice.

    2. Re:Symbols can out-last Objects by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It doesn't look like any Hasselblad I've ever seen. In fact I don't think I've seen a camera that looks like it. A cross between a box brownie and a vest-pocket type?

      Still, as you say, it works.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:Symbols can out-last Objects by Copley · · Score: 1

      It does suck... but it's now firmly ingrained in the UK driver psyche (we've all developed a hard-wired eyeball --> braking foot link!)

      I tried to find out why that specific icon was selected (it certainly won't have been at random - there's a whole bunch of careful research and testing that takes place for all UK signage - I once had a work colleague who'd worked in the Dept. of Transport signage labs... she was totally obsessed with sign layout, lettering, etc.), but I can't find the full story.

      --
      I am bald
    4. Re:Symbols can out-last Objects by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      In Lithuania the sign most likely shows a radar wave or something like that.

  38. Legacy identifications are nothing new by Karmashock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We maintain many symbols that don't make sense in a modern context anymore.

    They're symbols. We use them because they mean something. They are as useful as they are easily understood. If due to these modern changes people no longer understand what the symbols mean, THEN they'll be bad. But so long as people know what they mean they're fine.

    The objective is communication. That's the point of symbols. Until they're not understood they should remain unchanged. By all means, suggest alternatives and try to use them. But don't act like everyone else is doing the world a disservice by not following along.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  39. not everyone by pbjones · · Score: 1

    Some companies are always slow to change, and others keep their icon up-to-date.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  40. Shrouded in mystery? by BlueLightning · · Score: 1

    Sounds more like shrouded in ignorance to me...

  41. Wrenches? by os2fan · · Score: 1
    Hey, all i saw was a spanner and screw-driver.

    Still, those of us who have lives in the real world do fine-tune things with a spanner etc, such as to give some more gain to the victa or level the fridge. So the notion of a spanner and screw-driver for configure (ie adjust), has still some sense. Also, there's the delightful phrase 'spanner in the works'. This is just the dandy place to do it (i recall one girl changing all of the window furniture to blue, and then wondered why she couldn't see anything!).

    One should remember that the hard disk icon is sometimes shown as a stack of platters, and sometines as a grey box, but in one instance, the hard drive is not the volume, and secondly, not many people would pick out the fixed disks in a beige box. It's also interesting to see what people would think of floppy-disk icons when floppies aren't allowed at work.

    Still, there are steam engines used to show level crossings, because of all things railway, the steam engine is perfectly recognisable.

    As to the rabbit ears on the tele, that's about the most distinct thing about it, and even TiVo uses it in their logo.

    --
    OS/2 - because choice is a terrible thing to waste.
  42. Not that sure about the radio buttons, either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radio buttons don't resemble physical radio buttons that much. I'm 22 years old college student and part-time software developer. Before this article I indeed hadn't known why they're called radio buttons in the first place (I assumed that only one being enabled at a time was a reference to radio playing one channel at a time... or something. I have distant memory of having pondered that briefly in my teens but I didn't care enough to find out)... but I've never found them confusing because of that. You have a set of options and when you choose one, all the others are deactivated... you don't need to think about physical buttons on a radio to understand the concept. I guess you could say "We could just change the term" but I honestly don't see why... or what we would change it to.

  43. Let me get this straight by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    A guy who, at least based on his bio, isn't particularly young, and who works as a Principal Program Manager for that stodgy old tech company Microsoft - this is the guy who's talking about "old people icons"?

    Yeah, he sounds like he's on the cutting edge of stuff.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
  44. I don't think that means what you think it means by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't think your medical records are stored on vinyl discs, surely?

  45. Re:floppy disc by 2fuf · · Score: 2

    Dude, how do you think I feel? I'm 37...

  46. Crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who knows the origin of the alphabet.....nobody....who cares. But imagine the chaos if we changed it. Go get a real job.

  47. Rebus icons by Michael+Woodhams · · Score: 1

    Another problem I've complained about in the past is rebus icons. I once used a source control system where the icon to commit a change had a document page with a tick mark and an arrow pointing at the page. I'd been using it for several years before I realized what it was supposed to represent - Americans call a tick mark a 'check', so this was the 'document check-in' button. At which point I also realized the same applied to an email client which had an icon with an ticked envelope - 'check mail'.

    So, icons were supposed to be language independent, but instead in these examples they only made sense in one particular dialect.

    I also have a problem with Swedish appliances (washing machines, ovens) which have indecypherable icons for the various modes, and the manual has invariably been lost years ago. If they just labeled the modes in Swedish, at least I'd be able to look up the meanings online.

    --
    Quattuor res in hoc mundo sanctae sunt: libri, liberi, libertas et liberalitas.
  48. Rectangles! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Wrenches and Gears - Setup/Settings
    > Want to indicate Settings or Setup to a twenty something? Show them a tool they've never used in their lives.

    Do you really think "twenty-somethings" are so ignorant they don't know what a wrench or a gear is?

    > If you don't know who Johnny Carson is, how could you know that this is a old-style microphone?

    Because the same style of microphone is still used in recording studios and radio stations all over the world, including a lot of places where no one has ever heard of Johnny Whoever...?

    > Soon the envelope itself will go away and the next generation will wonder what this rectangle means and what it has to do with email.

    The envelope isn't going anywhere soon, and people will simply recognize it as "the symbol for mail". What does a small arrow have to do with playing movies? What do two vertical bars have to do with pausing something? What does a little cross have to do with adding numbers? What does a hook shape with a dot at the bottom have to do with questions? What does each letter's shape have to do with its sound or its meaning?

    Whoever wrote this article seems to think that icons must somehow be identical to the things they represent...

  49. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, half the items in that list are still in use today. Manilla folders, binoculars, envelopes, televisions, cameras, bookmarks...

    The floppy disk is the only really outdated thing in that list! And it's become so iconic that changing it now would be pointless.

    Wow, I'm only 21 and yet this is making me feel old.

    1. Re:What? by jones_supa · · Score: 2

      The floppy disk is the only really outdated thing in that list! And it's become so iconic that changing it now would be pointless.

      True. I think the floppy icon still works just fine, even though we don't have floppies anymore. In a same way a quill can quite naturally work as a text editor icon, even though we usually don't write with one anymore.

    2. Re:What? by Summitlake · · Score: 1

      That's because an icon is a standardized, universally recognized symbol, not someone "making a statement." I agree with you, but I think it's kind of cool that people DON'T recognize what the floppy symbol "was" anymore - precisely because it stood the test of time!

    3. Re:What? by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      Good point, too.

  50. Right on both points by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You have to have SOME icon for things, there is no reason to change it arbitrarily to shit nobody understands. People know that the calendar icon gets you, well a calendar even if they've never seen a real calendar.

    Then as you point out most of them are not at all archaic. Manila folders still dominate filing cabinets at businesses, TVs don't look like they did in the 50s, but TVs are still everywhere and not dropping in numbers. Wrenches are same as they ever were and if you own a house, you either have a wrench or will have one soon enough.

    This was just an article written by some moronic 19 year old hipster who has fuck-all experience with the world. "Oh these are things I've never seen in Starbucks or my philosophy 101 classroom, clearly they are obsolete!"

    Also, funny enough, companies do update their iconography. Like in Windows it uses an icon that looks like a widescreen LCD HDTV to represent a TV (for things like HDMI outs in the sound panel or the like). They do generally modernize the look as time goes on.

    However ultimately it doesn't matter. If we recognize the icon as meaning something, we will continue to. Hell take a look at the icon for Steam. It is a black background with a strange white joint on it. It is just the logo Valve made for Steam. I don't know what it is supposed to represent, if anything. Doesn't matter, I instantly recognize it and my brain says "That is Steam." Same shit with any other icon.

    1. Re:Right on both points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a set of valve gear from a steam locomotive.

    2. Re:Right on both points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a mechanical part of a Steampowered device, most likely a Steam Locomotive, just look at the wheels. I am not sure what it is called, it looks like a "Coupling Rod", but was probably intended to be a "Valve Gear". I believe I am right because it looks like something I saw on Back to the Future 3.

      It does not disprove your point, rather it likely proves it. We don't really need to know the origin, just be able to recognize it.

    3. Re:Right on both points by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      This was just an article written by some moronic 19 year old hipster who has fuck-all experience with the world. "Oh these are things I've never seen in Starbucks or my philosophy 101 classroom, clearly they are obsolete!"

      The guy is 38. I'd wager that's older than a good half of people posting froth-at-the-mouth comments here today. Why so much fuss about the icons, anyway - don't all the graybearded slashdotters use vim in a console?

    4. Re:Right on both points by Moridineas · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say I was frothing though I do think the blurb is moronic.

      I also think the average age on slashdot is substantially higher than it was 10 years ago.

    5. Re:Right on both points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The steam logo is a zoomed in section of a valve.

    6. Re:Right on both points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Steam icon comes from a locomotive steam engine.

    7. Re:Right on both points by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      You have to have SOME icon for things, there is no reason to change it arbitrarily to shit nobody understands. People know that the calendar icon gets you, well a calendar even if they've never seen a real calendar.

      Then as you point out most of them are not at all archaic. Manila folders still dominate filing cabinets at businesses, TVs don't look like they did in the 50s, but TVs are still everywhere and not dropping in numbers. Wrenches are same as they ever were and if you own a house, you either have a wrench or will have one soon enough.

      This was just an article written by some moronic 19 year old hipster who has fuck-all experience with the world. "Oh these are things I've never seen in Starbucks or my philosophy 101 classroom, clearly they are obsolete!"

      Also, funny enough, companies do update their iconography. Like in Windows it uses an icon that looks like a widescreen LCD HDTV to represent a TV (for things like HDMI outs in the sound panel or the like). They do generally modernize the look as time goes on.

      However ultimately it doesn't matter. If we recognize the icon as meaning something, we will continue to. Hell take a look at the icon for Steam. It is a black background with a strange white joint on it. It is just the logo Valve made for Steam. I don't know what it is supposed to represent, if anything. Doesn't matter, I instantly recognize it and my brain says "That is Steam." Same shit with any other icon.

      So what you're saying is that we're creating a new set of hieroglyphs for the computer world. I'm okay with that, but let's not call it intuitive. I can accept commonly accepted.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
  51. Re:floppy disc by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Punched paper tape. Punched cards. Core memory. Teletypes. Vacuum tubes. TV dinners in aluminum trays covered with aluminum foil. Mechanical calculators. 78 RPM records.

    I'm 63. You kids get the hell off my lawn and take your damned revisionist icons with you. The $ sign has been good for 150 years and I'll be damned if you want to screw with it. Take my floppy from my cold, dead hands I say. Whimper. Leave Gramps to die in peace, you whippersnappers with your iPads and clouds.

    Actually, modern interfaces are confusing as hell because user interface design has become so screwed up. When you use Gmail, some functions cannot be found, do not appear, until you're in the right region with the cursor and in the right mode of operation. It is confusing as hell when every new app uses it's own damned UI scheme created by a slacker who likes videogames and puzzles. So those who complain about the obsolescence of icons, how about creating usable software instead of complaining. And now again: lawn, off. Now.

  52. Re:floppy disc by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

    You talk about the $ sign. *I* remember when it had TWO vertical bars. Lazy 60 year olds.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  53. Save/discard/cancel/what by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    I still don't understand why we have to "Save" documents in today's computer age.

    I still don't understand why my super-complex nth-generation Office software still asks me if I want to "Save or Discard Changes" when I quit, without showing me what has changed in the document. (You might get a hint from the Undo drop-down, but that's a clumsy work-around, and doesn't work while the "Save/Discard" pop-up is showing.) Even the standard wiki text editors can do that, yet not one stand-alone program I've ever seen can show my what has changed between my saved and unsaved versions.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Microsoft Office has had that ability since at least 2003.

      http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/word-help/track-changes-while-you-edit-HP005188855.aspx

      There's your instructions on how to do it. I would be very surprised if other office software doesn't have the same ability, but since you capitalized the O in Office, I presume it was a proper noun.

    2. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      "I still don't understand why my super-complex nth-generation Office software still asks me if I want to "Save or Discard Changes" when I quit, without showing me what has changed in the document."

      Mostly because programmers have been phoning it in since 1998. Very few programmers have a clue as to how to write software.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      I clearly wasn't talking about a lack of versioning and its variants. I was talking about the standard 20+ year old Quit/Exit dialogue box.

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    4. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by alexgieg · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why my super-complex nth-generation Office software still asks me if I want to "Save or Discard Changes" when I quit, without showing me what has changed in the document.

      And I don't understand why Excel asks me whether I want to "save changes" to a spreadsheet I opened to look at and closed without actually changing anything.

      --
      Conservatism: (n.) love of the existing evils. Liberalism: (n.) desire to substitute new evils for the existing ones.
    5. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is your memory so poor, you can't remember the changes you just made?

    6. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd bet on patent laws :P

    7. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      What I don't understand is why word thinks that printing a document constitutes some sort of change, and it asks me to save (even if the doc is in my "temporary internet files" folder!)

      OK, I get that printing might (might!) adjust the pagination or whatever, but surely any moron can see that any such changes are changes it made on my behalf, not changes I actually made! Yet year after year this bug remains...

    8. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by garyebickford · · Score: 1

      Funny thing, I sometimes suspend my GVim session and go home from work. Then I come back in the morning, and I can use 'undo' back a few steps to remind me where I left off, then go forward to the end so I can continue. Of course I saved before I left ... usually!

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    9. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by nschubach · · Score: 1

      Some things mark changes you may have not done manually. (poor example: Let's say my IDE is setup to replace spaces with tabs or vice versa.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    10. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Because for most people, it would be more info that they'd need to ignore. In addition if you're trying to close or exit a document, it means that you're trying to finish a task- not begin a new one like evaluating a document difference.

      There is a place for that functionality, but it is something that the user should initiate. Otherwise it just gets scanned and ignored like any other popular. (Literally. Almost nobody reads a popular message or promotion if they didn't ask for it. They typically scan the response options for the one most likely to let them continue with what they want to do.)

    11. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      Damn you auto-correct. s/popular/pop-up

    12. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by stepho-wrs · · Score: 1

      Every time you print a doc, MS-Office adjusts the doc to remember it's last printed date (you can see the last printed date in the list of auto values, along with useful stuff like current date, number of pages, etc). Hence it wants to save the change. Pointless, but that's their rational.

    13. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by CapOblivious2010 · · Score: 1

      Wow... yes, that's pointless.

      Excel has certain settings (e.g. selected page, column widths, etc) that are saved with the document, but which do not cause the dirty bit to be set when they are changed. This way you can open a spreadsheet and look around, but it doesn't prompt you to save unless you change something "important". It seems like "last printed date" should be treated similarly.

    14. Re:Save/discard/cancel/what by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      I see your point, but when you look at the number of features added to modern software (such as Office), that are intended for a tiny number of users, I would think this would be an easy sell. You close the document, the save/discard dialogue appears, and the document highlights the last change.

      You open a document for reference, notice and fix a typo/error while grabbing whatever you wanted out of it, then spent six hours working on the main document. Then you finish up, save and close the main document, then close the reference doc and get the save/discard dialogue... wait, did I change something intentionally, or did I just cut instead of copy by mistake, or just leant on the keyboard? Inevitably, for me, I remember about 1/2 a second after I click "discard" (or save). It would be nice to have that instant visual memory jogger of seeing the highlighted change. It doesn't require you to study the document, it's just an instant visual cue.

      (Auto-correct: What browser? I see this complaint more and more lately.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  54. Dolly by jones_supa · · Score: 4, Funny

    I had a chuckle a couple of days ago when I saw the VirtualBox "Clone" menu icon to be a sheep.

    1. Re:Dolly by allo · · Score: 1

      clone-cd started that meme

  55. Old People Icons for things still in use? by chrismcb · · Score: 1
    Sure there are things that fall out of use, and many times we still retain their word usage (full steam ahead?)
    But seriously, this list?
    • I am planning to buy a brand new car radio. It still has buttons the has one selection at a time
    • A lot of people still use clipboards
    • People still use bookmarks. Even school children.
    • People still have address "books" They may not be physical books, but they are still a collection of address
    • I think a lot of people have physical calenders, but everyone has digital calendars... Or did we stop needed to take into account the date?
    • Every phone I know of sitll uses voicemail.
    • Fewer people use folders, but they are still in use
    • Handset? Hmmm ok yeah that one is dieing off
    • Magnifying glass and Binocluars are still used, or did everyone suddenly get bionic vision? Watch a detective show like CSI they still use magnifying glasses. Go to a sports game people int he stands use binoculars
    • Envelopes. USPS is still in business, but people use envelopes for more than just mail.
    • I understand that maybe fewer people work on their own car, but people still use wrenches, and gears are still used to move things
    • The microphone doesn't normally have that iconic 50's shiny metal look. And fewer people are holding them. But I think most kids can still recognize a microphone. They are still used at concerts... a lot of young people go to concerts
    • Photography???? Huh, wasn't instagram, essentially a photo site, sold for like a quintillion dollars?
    • Televisions??? Sure they are flat panel displays, and most people probably play xbox on them... but people still watch tv
    • Carbon Copies... yeah not many people use carbon copies... what icon is a carbon copy?
    • Blue prints? I'm pretty sure the same people who used blue prints yesterday use them today.

    Yes some things come and go... and some things are cultural (like the mailbox icon for mail) and over years some will change. But like some words that still retain their meaning 100 years after their technology stopped being used, I suspect that some icons will still be used for a long time.

    1. Re:Old People Icons for things still in use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see the point of Slashdot modding up posts that are against the popularization. However the popularization is the job of the UI designers and the general public. You can say that something is not "dead" when 0.00005% of the population uses it. True. However, using that as a basis for UI design is a bad design concept. It may be artistic design choice but not a working one.

  56. Old People Icons, huh? by snap2grid · · Score: 2

    I think he's misunderstood the meaning of "symbol", which is after all not a literal representation of what it's depicting. If you have a problem with a Floppy Disk symbol because the current generation hasn't seen one (did the past suddenly disappear? Did we collectively stop recording history?) then what about the letter "A"? Originally it represented the Head of an Ox. I'm guessing that more people reading this have seen a floppy disk than have seen an ox.

  57. What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Agreed, there was nothing that required the floppy icon to mean Save and not Open. (Or even File-Manager. Click on the disk to view what's on the disk, wouldn't that make sense?)

    What the icons mean is mostly arbitrary. But like the controls on cars, once the manufacturers standardised, it meant anyone who could drive, could quickly adapt to any new model. The current trend towards highly generic mono outline icons, different in nearly every program even on the same platform, is completely counter-productive.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by mapkinase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >But like the controls on cars, once the manufacturers standardised, it meant anyone who could drive, could quickly adapt to any new model

      That's true, the usability of an icon is determined by two numbers: N and M and their ratio, where N is the number of times where icon means what most people expect and M is the number of times where icon means something else. And for situation you've described:

      >The current trend towards highly generic mono outline icons, different in nearly every program even on the same platform, is completely counter-productive.

      N=1 and M is not.

      Tip: use a tip (mouseover), that's what I do anyway. Without mouseover, to me the icons are just colorful decorative addition to the menu bars because the author was fond of Maya civilization.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    2. Re:What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just how do you mouse-over on a touch-device? (They're plagued with those meaningless mono outline type icons.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    3. Re:What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      All my icons on my phone have also an app name. Just wait until a powerful marketeer will have a brilliant idea to remove them.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    4. Re:What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 2

      Like TFS/TFA, I'm talking about in-app icons for functions, not the app's own icon. Every app seems to use their own versions, none are standardised, they hardly ever have function names, and they increasingly seem to be generic monotone outlines. Oh, a half-filled circle, the function of that is obvious. An outline square next to a filled square, how informative.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    5. Re:What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by mapkinase · · Score: 2

      Oh! Yes! Now I am getting it. You are exactly right. Those icons are completely undecipherable to me. I almost hear the ringing and feel the saliva build up in my mouth each time I am trying to navigate through the new app by pressing the buttons to see what happens.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    6. Re:What is the icon for get-off-my-lawn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your touch interface doesn't recognize your finger hovering over the screen, not yet pushing?

      Hmm... weird.

  58. This line of text is terminated by a "line feed." by mbstone · · Score: 3, Informative

    Or maybe by a "carriage return" followed by a "line feed." You see, the text I am writing, and that you are reading, is written in ASCII which is based on the Model 33 Teletype. On a Teletype, a carriage return character (0x0D) would cause the print head to travel all the way to the left; a line feed (0x0A) would cause a roll of paper to move vertically upward by one line.

    The modern experience of "going online" is derived from the fact that the Model 33 Teletype had a rotary switch that controlled an electric motor. This switch had three positions, "Line," "Off, and "Local." At my high school, one prepared computer programs in BASIC using "Local" mode so that the program could be punched onto paper tape, one character at a time, while the Teletype was disconnected from the computer system.

    Use of computer systems had to be paid for according to the amount of time used, measured in seconds or even milliseconds. Computer time was then too expensive for a user to be allowed to sit at the Teletype keyboard and manually enter keystrokes; instead, after the entire program was punched onto paper tape, the switch would be turned to the "Line" position and the paper tape reader would cause the program to be transmitted to the computer at the Teletype's maximum speed of 110 baud. This was known as "going on Line."

    Early microcomputer systems, like larger computers, used Teletypes as I/O devices and ASCII was used internally to store and interpret alphanumeric data. This continued long after users migrated from Teletypes to video display terminals, e.g. DEC VT-100, and then to the IBM PC as the I/O device of choice. Many special function keys from the Model 33 remain in use to this day, for example the Esc (0x1B), Ctrl, Backspace (0x08), Tab (0x09) and DEL (0x7F) keys. The DEL (Delete) code is 0x7F because hitting DEL would cause all the holes in that row of paper tape to be punched (get it, 0x7F). So if you made a typing mistake you could back up the paper tape by one character and type DEL, this would punch through your errant character and the computer would ignore the DEL character.

  59. $ = DEBT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $ sign is still used in a meaning of money or profit, while it should mean debt.

  60. Next Week's Episode by wienerschnizzel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Next week we'll examine the outdated gestures like the handshake and the military salute.

    Jeesh, do kids born after 1500 even know what these things mean?!

    1. Re:Next Week's Episode by eyenot · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should inspect the hand-shake again, because everybody under 40 seems to shake hands like a fag, gripping the tips of your fingers as soon as they're in reach and shaking the tips of your fingers.

      I actually had to say to somebody recently, "hey, by the way, when you're shaking hands, make sure the hands connect before you shake. Don't shake somebody's fingers."

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  61. "Drop down menus with words in" by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    But...all the reviews say nobody would voluntarily buy a Blackberry nowadays because of the drop down menus with words in. Apparently I am the only person in the world who has trouble with all the random icons in Android.

    Of course the reason is I18N. My Japanese satnav has little buttons which were obviously originally designed to hold Japanese symbols. The English version just about works, with words like "Route" and "Guide". The French and German options are simply full of abbreviations.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  62. Manila folders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Manila folders and files aren't going away. There's quite a bit of paper on my desk at any given time and when I'm done with it I either toss it or file it away in a drawer of my desk. And when I give a stack of paper to someone else to read and comment on I use, gasp, manila folders. Where does this guy work? Or, more generally: How can people function without the convenience of pen and paper?

  63. Everything you know is obsolete by WaffleMonster · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I am not able to remember when I last saw a floppy disk icon I appreciate and identify with your insatiable thirst for cherry picking and hyperbole.

    Radio buttons... Thanks for the education. I never gave it a second thought or made that connection because like yourself I'm a fucking idiot. Speaking of connections how does this label count as an icon that "does not make sense" anymore? What icon? And since when the hell do non-programmers (using term very loosly) even know radio buttons are called radio buttons anyway?

    'No, books didn't "keep our place when we turned them off."' Personally I use old movie tickets as bookmarks while debugging my punch cards.

    "I use folders because I use the 43 Folders organizational system"

    You admit even you use folders and yet this still makes your list of 14 icons that don't make sense anymore. Why is your nonsense even on slashdot? How much moola did it take to get ./ to sell its soul? Why am I wasting my time replying to this? I suspect its cause we're both fucking idiots.

    "The world's most advanced phones include an icon that looks like a phone handset that you haven't touched in 20 years, unless you've used a pay phone recently."

    What you really meant to say was "I have not had a job in 20 years"

    "Soon the envelope itself will go away and the next generation will wonder what this rectangle means and what it has to do with email. "

    Hate to break it to ya snail mail aint not going nowhere anytime soon. I'm drawn like a bug to headlights to origional point of this exercise.. "14 other old people icons that don't make sense anymore". I understand you may think the flux capacitor you ordered off ebay was sold as a "prop" only to cover for its amazing properties just as the xbox360 "box only" I ordered contained an actual xbox360.

    "If you don't know who Johnny Carson is, how could you know that this is a old-style microphone?"

    I know right cause if you like google "usb microphone" only modern futurastic usb era microphones appear and they look NOTHING like that icon.

    "Want to indicate Settings or Setup to a twenty something? Show them a tool they've never used in their lives."

    Now your just being rude and condescending. What I might have said previously in humor I mean sincerely now "FUCK YOU".

    "No one under 30 has seen a Polaroid in years but we keep using them for icons. Instagram sold for $1B with an icon whose subtlety was lost on its target audience"

    Ok so your under 30... now lets see if we can narrow the field with our "binoculars"... 12? 11?.. close?

    That instagram icon does not show any slots with pictures coming out of it. In fact it does not even remotly resemble a real polariod camera at all. The only resembelence I see is a misplaced iconic rainbow stripe. It actually resembles a nondescript film camera. Instagram uses such icons because nostalgia is the whole fucking point of instagram.

  64. I don't see the point by Casandro · · Score: 1

    As long as there still is DRM, the printed book certainly won't disappear, except in the homes of a bunch of idiots who will be left without those DRMed files after a few years.
    Postal mail still is essential to businesses as most of their workflows are paper based. In your usual company you have some computer system printing out some information on a sheet of paper. With e-mail you would have to scan that printout in before you can attach it, a process even harder than generating PDF files directly which is, if technically possible at all, quite difficult.

    Diskettes may have died out in the world of web-design, but when it comes to manufacturing, many companies are stuck with some 1990s $100k piece of machinery getting its data via diskette only. In fact, every PC case I bought over the last few years still had a slot for a 5 1/4 inch diskette drive. They often even lack one of the front panels so you have to install it. Otherwise you'd have an empty space in your front.

    Those things may all have long been gone in certain areas, but in the real world it's nothing like that.

  65. Shouldn't we start with the alphabet first? by nurbles · · Score: 1

    "iconic glyphs whose origins are shrouded in mystery to many"

    That describes our alphabet, numbers, and other writing glyphs rather well, doesn't it? If glyphs created within the past 50 years are already bosolete and need to be changed, then our alphabet must be desperately in need of the same, no?

    1. Re:Shouldn't we start with the alphabet first? by eyenot · · Score: 1

      But the Roman alphabet doesn't bear resemblance to real world objects so it's a timeless abstract. Even the Greek and Hebrew it was based off of no longer bore resemblance to real world objects (though some may say some of the primitive Hebrew resembled mouthparts, the eventual codified version was just a bunch of squiggly lines). These objects, meanwhile, are facsimiles of real world objects, and the point of the article is that many of these objects are no longer part of daily life. So the purpose of making the facsimiles -- to recall for the user the functions of objects that they are familiar with -- is ruined due to the fact that you can no longer expect the user to be familiar with the objects. However, buh biddy blah blah bluhblahblahblah, blahdah ditty blah blah bliddy. By the way, I nominate "bosolete" for "new word that needs a meaning attached" because it sounds cool.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  66. Pay attention, Apple! by irexe · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why it is beyond comprehension that Apple, of all companies I might add, has introduced the faux-leather calendar and the address book that looks like a paper book in Lion. After they spent several iterations of OS X to arrive at the beautiful uniform sleek look of Snow Leopard WHY did they regress to using a real world metaphor that makes no sense to half their users?

  67. my turn my turn by eyenot · · Score: 1

    options: gears/wrenches --> a yellow triangle (caution sign) with an exclamation point in it with a little red X instead of a "point"

    saving: floppy disk --> anatomical brain

    video entertainment programming: TV --> MTV

    calendar: calendar --> christmas present

    folders: manila envelope --> kitten and yarn-ball /or/ matrushka doll

    take a picture: aperture camera --> breasts with penis

    save my place: bookmarks --> treasure map

    remember this person: rolodex / blackbook --> spy silhouette

    cut/paste: clipboards --> open mouths

    "wait": hourglass --> rotating spiral

    on-disk search: eyeglass --> hourglass

    in-file search: binoculars --> cop

    send functions: postage envelopes --> globe

    copies: carbon copy flyaway --> tiers of identically dogeared pages

    new RadioButton --> new Selector(exclusive)

    new CheckBox --> new Selector(inclusive)

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  68. "Pump the Brakes" by Sir_Kurt · · Score: 1

    OT but pumping the brakes is not what people used to do before anti-lock brakes. Pumping the brakes is what you do when the brake system hydraulics are failing, and you need to build up fluid and pressure in the line so the pedal doesn't hit the floor when you want to stop. Pumping the brakes was made a thing of the past by dual brake system circuits. Not anti-lock brakes.

    Kurt

    1. Re:"Pump the Brakes" by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Pumping the brakes is exactly what you were taught to do (and the exact phrase used) before anti-lock brakes. Press and release the brakes rapidly in order to prevent the wheels from locking up.

  69. Well... by EchoRomeo · · Score: 0

    Replacing every icon with a smart phone would be very confusing.

    1. Re:Well... by arekq · · Score: 1

      If you replace every icon with a smart phone in a smart phone, you have recursion.

  70. The universe where meat is from the supermarket by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Sometimes you read stories about people who think you can swim under continents or that USA is the only country or Jesus spoke English or whatever other subject someone found to show how stupid people can be. The person who wrote the Icon article is so stupid he went and wrote an article on himself about stupid people.

    Does this person think that a box with an arrow out of the bottom indicated a trap door up ahead? I certainly wouldn't be looking for a trapdoor for a way out of a building, no telling what you might fall into. Mind you, the entrance is even worse! Why is there no sign to the stairs so I can get on top of the building so I can drop down into it?

    Ages ago, Seinfeld did a routine in which he ridiculed how airplanes have to fly a certain speed as if there are speed limits up there around airports or something... well yes you stupid moronic idiot, how can anyone be so fucking retarded as to think that airplanes lining up for approach one behind the other can fly whatever speed they want. Since he did this early on, I never caught the Seinfeld craze, to me he was always just a really stupid retard who made jokes for stupid people. Real humor is done by really smart people who point out the funny stuff in life, not how ignorant they are of the in ability for aircraft to fly through each other while landing.

    Cars used to come with keys and these keys were inserted into the ignition and then turned to start the car and turned again to turn the car off. This was so common that everyone just assumed this was the way things are done. Cue some retarded engineer who thought he could do things differently, added a start button that then has to be hold for 5-30 seconds depending on how insane the engineer is. Cue people dying because they can't figure out in a panic how to turn the engine off. We use icons and standardized methods because people know them so they can use them without having to think.

    Another famous example is for web developers, the humble shopping cart icon. Some designers think it is funny to mess with this and voila, people can't find it. Your business might have a basket like product that is oh so funny to use as a shopping cart but your customers don't make the connection because they don't do their shopping in a dog-sled. (Example from some UI design book).

    And gosh, do you know how can tell a true idiot who tries to look clever by pointing out where he doesn't get how the world works? He totally fails to think through his own complaints and solutions.

    The Floppy disk icon for saving. First off, I checked. Not a SINGLE application I use actually has such an icon. Not a one. Most use simple text in a menu and are designed for people who use CTRL-S. Some other idiot above wonders why you even need to save manually when you exit an application. BECAUSE YOU FREAKING WASTE OF SPACE, THE FUCKING APPLICATION CAN'T READ THE DISEASED ROTTING MASS YOU CALL A BRAIN. You might NOT want to save the waste of bits you call work. God knows nobody else does.

    The brainiacs suggestion as an alternative? A cloud icon. WHOOO! Because what if I am not saving to the cloud? Anyway, from Amazon's robust performance I am not entirely convinced they are not saving their files to a big stack of floppies.

    Next up, radio buttons... does he think they are icons? Apparently... how the fuck is a user dumb enough not to know single select buttons in physical form going to know these UI elements are called radio buttons? Or indeed care, such a person is to busy trying to convince rent-o-kill to come fix his mouse problem.

    Clipboards... he shows exactly where almost everyone will still see these in daily use. He doesn't even bother coming up with an alternative, because no alternative would make sense. What next, a pair of scissors for cut is wrong to? WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU SUGGEST INSTEAD?

    I will skip a few because my rage level is getting out of control.

    The world's most advanced phones include an icon that looks like a phone handset that you haven't touched i

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with everything except the keyless car starters. Their purpose is to offer a bit of convenience - the door unlocks with a button push when the wireless key is near, and make vehicle theft more difficult.

    2. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Your nerd-rage is a little frightening. Maybe try taking walks outside from time to time.

      Since he did this early on, I never caught the Seinfeld craze, to me he was always just a really stupid retard who made jokes for stupid people.

      And I'm sure all those millions of stupid people who like Seinfeld just quake in their boots when an intellect as vast and powerful as yours comes around.

      Your business might have a basket like product that is oh so funny to use as a shopping cart but your customers don't make the connection because they don't do their shopping in a dog-sled.

      Maybe not, but I don't do my shopping with a shopping cart, either. I hate pushing those things around. I almost never use them, and certainly never when I'm only buying one item (which seems like nine times out of ten when I'm shopping online). I understand what the picture means, of course, but it doesn't really connect to my own shopping experience. A basket might make more sense.

      The Floppy disk icon for saving. First off, I checked. Not a SINGLE application I use actually has such an icon. Not a one.

      TextPad uses it. So there's one. Good job on avoiding that icon, though, because I suspect seeing it might cause you to fly into a purple-faced rage.

      Clipboards... he shows exactly where almost everyone will still see these in daily use.

      Daily use? I haven't seen one in years. But his real point is perfectly valid ... what is it about a clipboard that evokes the idea of "Cut and Paste"? Is that what you use a clipboard for? No, you use it to fill out forms ... something that the icon has nothing to do with.

      The CD icon... WHAT does it represent? It absolutely under no circumstance represents as CD as codified by the requirments of Philips and Sony.

      If I want to burn a CD, then a picture of a CD makes absolute sense, and it does absolutely "represent a CD"... your argument about why it doesn't is frankly baffling.

      nothing like being reminded on a Sunday that whatever else I might be, I am superior to at least one person in this world.

      Yeah, well I hope you're not keeping count. Seriously, take some deep breaths, go look at some flowers, maybe have some ice cream.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by GlucoPilot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow. I'm a real person here, FYI. There are more words in your comment than in the post itself.

      It was a 20 min silly little throwaway post I did at lunch. I'm sorry it offended your sensibilities, but at least it gave you a chance to vent on the internet.

      - Scott

      --
      http://hanselman.com
    4. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're quite liberal in Holland and it is certainly easy to get some pot to smoke. Perhaps you should try some and mellow out.

    5. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you're telling a guy he should off himself with a screwdriver to the head because you don't agree with his whimsical opinion at modern icons all while having the email etiquette of my mother...

      Just sayin'...

      -Chris

    6. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whoah. go for a walk outside in the fresh air. you will feel better. either that or go to the pub and get drunk.

    7. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are encouraging this guy to get drunk? Now there's a scary thought. No telling what he might get up to, other than yelling out his rants in public without the cushion of sitting behind a computer screen.

    8. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit dude. You need to get some Prozac, stat.

      You must be a pleasure to work with.

    9. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than likely a person makes these kinds of online rants to make themselves feel empowered when they otherwise are not. In reality this person is probably some meak and meager individual who is constantly picked on and so rants like these is there way of coping. Hense, you wouldn't need to be worried about a person like this going out and getting drunk because they only way they will be able to cause any damage is with a bomb strapped to their chest.

      - Tim

    10. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your rant completely and totally diminishes you as an Engineer, Designer or even as a fellow Human being. Scott often posts random stuff X about topic Y. You best hope that your name cannot be lined back to this post as it would be 1) immediate reason not to hire you 2) immediate reason to think about firing you.

    11. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by CodeMonkey888 · · Score: 1

      You are now on my NO HIRE lists. If you were on my team you would be summarily ejected/fired for posting such a rant. Have you ZERO social skills? I agree with the other poster - you must be an absolute JOY to work with. If you notice I will take you on anywhere anytime without reverting to crass and out of line language which was COMPLETELY out of line when responding to such a mandane and ordinary post by someone that has more class/ability/respect than one such as you.

    12. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness, seinfeld is stupid.

    13. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not joking with this post. I'm serious....

      There are a lot of great books out there on Anger. I see your post as a bit of a cry for help.
      http://www.amazon.com/Anger-Cooling-Thich-Nhat-Hanh/dp/1573229377
      http://www.amazon.com/Rage-Step---Step-Overcoming-Explosive/dp/1572244623/ref=sr_1_8?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1336967375&sr=1-8

      If you are so angry at someone else then it is typically a sign that you need to do some self analysis, big time.

      good luck and please take some deep breaths and find some peace!

    14. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, calm down. Have a camomile tea.

    15. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess icons are holy to some people... oh!... never mind. :)

    16. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fairness, your mother wears combat boots.

      -Jerry

    17. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I will skip a few because my rage level is getting out of control."

      SmallFurryCreature who likes to skip, I know you lived near Utrecht but were you also living up North in Oslo recently? Anders Behring Breivik, is that you? Did Judge Nesheim grant you some e-time? Ok, now back in your box [and trap-door looking icon, click!].

      Yours truly,
      -Jerry S.

    18. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa... go eat a sandwich!

      http://www.notquitewrong.com/rosscottinc/2011/08/03/so-youre-mad-about-something-on-the-internet/

    19. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yikes man, I didn't get the same thing from the original post that you did. That is, I don't think he was saying "we should change these icons because people are too dumb and inexperienced to know what they mean". I think it was just an amusing observation of dead or dying technologies that have been immortalized via icons.

    20. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr. know it all has finally been found. Stop the presses. What a joke.

    21. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must work at Microsoft.

    22. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Floppy disk icon for saving. First off, I checked. Not a SINGLE application I use actually has such an icon. Not a one.

      You must be using a C64 then...

      To name a few of the big ones: Microsoft Visual Studio, MonoDevelop, LibreOffice, GIMP, every program in the Microsoft Office suite uses a floppy disc icon for the save-function, because everyone knows the meaning of it.

    23. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mad bro?

    24. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putting aside the rant, I kind of think it's amusing that this individual actually doesn't have reading comprehension. Seriously...

    25. Re:The universe where meat is from the supermarket by codecore · · Score: 1

      Scott, Don't be sorry for his irrational reaction to an opinion piece.
      To SmallFurryCreature:
      I don't know what you have against stupid people. We all can't be smart like you. Unfortunately, your disrespect to the author has eclipsed any argument you have made against the subject of the original piece. So rather than address your arguments, I will point out your attacks and bias. This is not to say you have no valid points. It is simply to discredit you as a critic. I have no intention for this to be fair or balanced.

      "The person who wrote the Icon article is so stupid he went and wrote an article on himself about stupid people." This statement indicates the theme of your attack. It reveals your ignorance, as basic internet research would show that the author is far from stupid. Further, equating people who have no history with the items that are the subject of the icons, with "stupid people" leads me to conclude that you are unable to discern the difference. I suspect that we'll see more of this failing in your analysis.

      Your inexplicable reference to Seinfeld, and your profanity laced statement did not appear to relate to the article under review. It did reveal your distaste for a cultural icon, and separates you further from your audience. This paragraph confirms your hatred for stupid people. Calling Seinfeld a retard again indicates your ignorance of the people your are writing about. Obviously the man is intelligent, and works hard for his success. Your reference to the speed of aircraft in controlled airspace was yet another distraction from any point you were trying to make. At this point, I must recommend a college-level course in critical thinking.

      The following paragraph appears to be a rant about cars that start using a button rather that keys. Of course you took the opportunity to call some unknown engineers "retard" and "insane". Another slam on people you have never met, and using the ever popular grade-school term "retard". That of course, is a slam against retarded people, typically those with downs-syndrome. Of course those folks can not help their condition, but that doesn't stop you from using such an offensive term. At this point, your credibility as critical writer is question. We'll see if you can pull it out.

      Your statement about the shopping cart icon was thoughtful, and actually contributed something. The following paragraph is more evidence of your bias, strictly opinion without any reference to the original article, or the subject under discussion.

      The paragraph on the floppy icon was truly bad. Rather than argue that your sample space is limited, I'll point out your habit of calling another person an idiot, followed by your continued use of profanity; always the mark of an intellectual. That was sarcasm.

      The critique of the authors use of the term "radio button" was especially lacking. Of course nobody suggested that a user would know that these are radio buttons. The author is aware that the people reading his post will probably know, and added a picture of a radio next to the user interface, not to mention that he explains the reason for this term in the article.

      Once we get to clipboard and scissors paragraph, we are treated to your rage against the author, complete with 'yelling' (all caps) and yet more profanity. Once more, your have done nothing to move the conversation forward.

      Then we get to hear about your rage level. Apparently this article has effected you on an emotional level, if not a logical level. This explains your failure to critique the article, so far.

      Then we see you actually slam the author, suggesting that he was born without a brain and grew up and wrote the article that you are 'critiquing'. Again, had you done basic research, you would know that his claim to fame far exceeds a simple article on the anachronism of the symbols on icons. Research appears to be beyond your capability. A confusing paragraph about trains in Holland follows, then more ramblings about CD icons, and music, and something ab

  71. He thinks very little of younger people by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

    Seriously, 20 somethings haven't used a screw driver or or wrench? Instragram was made by young people largely for young people. Hipsters certainly know what a polaroid is. It's the thing that gives them wet dreams.

    It's very easy to sit there, assume every young person is an idiot and moan about icons using "out dated" imagery to describe their purpose but why no try and propose something better and more modern? I suspect it's not easy at all which is why it's easy to find people that moan about these icons but no one who can propose something better.

    We have centuries of information to reference. Assuming no one has seen these things and everyone just works with computers and electronic devices but that's not true. We still sell piles of calendars. We still use folders, pencils and cameras with lenses and we still use phones with handsets. Perhaps not every single person does but they've no gone away.

    1. Re:He thinks very little of younger people by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Seriously, 20 somethings haven't used a screw driver or or wrench?

      Yeah, I think he got a little off track with that one. More to the point, how does a pile of interconnecting gears send the message "Change the Configuration Settings"? A screwdriver makes a little bit of sense because you can use it to adjust torque, but most people these days use a screwdriver to build furniture, not to tweak the configuration of things. I guess the gears are supposed to mean "look inside and see how it works"?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    2. Re:He thinks very little of younger people by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I presume it's meant to imply the things in that section are part of the inner workings of the system and more integral to how the system works which is correct to be fair.

  72. Re:floppy disc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree, interface design has gone completely titsup. I've been playing Battlefield Bad Company 2 lately, and its amazing how badly that interface is/works. Some buttons have double functions but the same name, which doesnt make sense for both conditions, for example closing the application is beneath the 'exit game' button, which is fine. But when you are connected to a server it disconnects you but doesnt close the game. yet it looks the same but doesnt work as expected. Also note that many interface elements have orange bars that resemble buttons. But not all of them, some of them dont function when you click on them. You also have 2 ways of browsing for servers, both through a unique button in the main screen but how you browse is still slightly different, one of them is rundant.

    Anyway, screenshots explain this way better. Its just something that has been itching me whilst playing and made me realize that a set of complete idiots designed the interface without putting any though into it.

  73. Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by tepples · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's wrong with Auto-save

    In theory, a program could add a revision for every keystroke. But if you want to revert to a previous revision, it'd be tedious to find the right revision that way. In addition, it'd need to keep the hard drive spinning all the time to store all the diffs in case of power failure. Even in an application with automatic saving, the "save" button still has a purpose, namely to mark a revision as worth keeping.

    1. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by garyebickford · · Score: 2

      Back in the day, the Perq workstation's text editor had a modification transcript that it kept. If bad things happened, you could 'play' the transcript, and watch yourself work. If, for example, the system lost power, when you restarted the transcript would contain every change typically up to the last block write, so you'd have lost maybe only the last half dozen changes.

      One time I was in the zone, and edited a file for almost 30 hours without saving (dumb, but hey...) The machine went south, and I lost it all. But I was able to play the transcript back and only lost a half-hour's work. I actually asked the Vim forum about ways to do this, and the nice folks there suggested ways it could be implemented as a plug-in but I haven't pursued it - my own laziness abounds.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    2. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by nschubach · · Score: 1

      With SSDs drive spinning is going "out of style". And finding old revisions could be as simple as scrubbing back through a history bar like watching a video. (I don't know what the other reply was referring to with the Perq workstations (I never used one) but it sounds pretty neat as well.

      You could potentially have a "save" button like you describe, but it wouldn't really be a save as much as a "bookmark" to quickly jump back to a previous spot in your document timeline.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      In theory, a program could add a revision for every keystroke. But if you want to revert to a previous revision, it'd be tedious to find the right revision that way.

      Whereas it's easy to find a previous revision now, particularly if you didn't save the specific version that you're looking for under a separate filename? Come now. Search for changes by date and time. Search for changes that add or remove specific phrases. Display overall document length as a function of time. Zoomable, scrollable display of changes over time, with annotated marks at each 'save' point.

      In addition, it'd need to keep the hard drive spinning all the time to store all the diffs in case of power failure.

      The twentieth century called; they want their storage technology back. Hard drives don't have to spin anymore. Portable devices are all operating off batteries (or backed up by batteries) anyway, so power outages aren't the bogeyman they once were. Worst case scenario a memory cache is flushed to disk every five or ten minutes and we're no worse off than the current 'autosave'.

      Even in an application with automatic saving, the "save" button still has a purpose, namely to mark a revision as worth keeping.

      True, but not really a problem. Use the 'save' button to insert an annotation in the editing history instead of creating or fixing a file.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    4. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by Solandri · · Score: 1

      In theory, a program could add a revision for every keystroke. But if you want to revert to a previous revision, it'd be tedious to find the right revision that way.

      Possibly true for word processors. But Lightroom saves every modification step you make to a photo (unless you choose to prune them), and it is wonderful. I can instantly compare the current version of a photo to any previous version. It would be cooler if they implemented edit trees instead of saving just a single linear edit path, but there's plenty of time in the future for that.

    5. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the implementation of it in Mac OS 10.7? They auto-save periodically (after about a paragraph's worth of text in a text editor), and finding previous revisions is not as tedious as you suggest, since you can literally scroll back through them and observe the changes being made. The fact that you can interact with those old revisions (e.g. copying from them) without having to restore them also makes them simple to use, since you can grab a sentence or two that you may have removed but wanted to bring back.

      As for having to keep the hard disk spinning, that's a rather silly idea unless you're offering guarantees that every keystroke will be saved in case of a power failure, which, in practice, is not that much more useful than batching the keystrokes and saving them every X. You'd still get every keystroke, with the possibility of having lost up to the last X keystrokes. Again, it's about as useful in practice and doesn't have any of the downsides you're talking about.

      I do agree that the Save button serves a purpose, however, especially in systems where they don't save after every keystroke, since it's a way of ensuring that a revision is created at a time when it might not otherwise be created.

    6. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Even in an application with automatic saving, the "save" button still has a purpose, namely to mark a revision as worth keeping.

      Perhaps just a 'Check' button to save a checkpoint. Or will somebody say that nobody knows what a checkmark is anymore?

      BTW, my daughter is in third grade and they're almost all paper-based. She knows all about folders, checkmarks, magnifying glasses, binoculars, clipboards, etc. I guess I shoud read the article, but it sounds like the author is really out of touch from the summary. OK, yeah, floppy disk, that's a used-up Microsoft convention from the late 80's.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Save button marks a revision as worth keeping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's wrong with Auto-save

      In theory, a program could add a revision for every keystroke. But if you want to revert to a previous revision, it'd be tedious to find the right revision that way. In addition, it'd need to keep the hard drive spinning all the time to store all the diffs in case of power failure. Even in an application with automatic saving, the "save" button still has a purpose, namely to mark a revision as worth keeping.

      WHAT? In what piece of software in use today is the save function commonly understood to mean any sort of version control?
      1. It is commonly understood in computing that "save" means what used to be there will no longer be!
      We have all sorts of phrases and verbs that relate to version control. Save as, commit, check in, backup, snapshot, snap, tag, label, etc...
      The word "edit" does more to convey the presence of some kind of version control than "save". It's not an accident the undo and redo functions are often stuck under an "edit" menu.

      2. There is a better than 9/10 chance your OS probably spins up your hard drives just to page things out when it is IDLE.

      3. Speaking as a backup admin, users should never be trusted to know which revisions are worth keeping, this is point-in-time backup software's raison d'être.

  74. Ah, the irony by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 1
    Even as he complains but icons he uses terms whose origins are shrouded in mystery for many. He uses the clip board as an example and wonders why is should mean cut and not paste. Perhaps paste would be better served by a bottle of rubber cement to harken back to the days of page layout where you actually cut text and pasted in replacements. Even so, how may people have actually cut and pasted something?

    We use symbols to represent actions or things as a way of communicating; even if the original meaning is lost to antiquity the symbols is not so it's still an effective tool. Replacing it with more modern designs merely means people have to relearn what they mean even though they have an already effective set in broad use.

    --
    I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
  75. Microphones? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microphones? editor, are you just fucking high?

  76. Re:I don't think that means what you think it mean by lxs · · Score: 1

    Ironically, in Soviet Russia, vinyl discs were made of medical records!
    No really, they were. It's not a joke.

  77. Others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Outside the sphere of IT, two that make me laugh are:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chatter_Telephone

    Our 1-year-old boy has one of these, though he has never seen a rotary phone. He doesn't get it at all. However, we've given him an old Nokia mobile phone handset with the battery removed and he often puts it to his ear to make a call (as he also does with remote controls or anything that kind of shape.)

    Also, the UK road sign for an ungated railway level crossing is a picture of a steam locomotive.
    http://www.driving-test-success.com/driving-articles/level-crossings.htm

    1. Re:Others by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Also, the UK road sign for an ungated railway level crossing is a picture of a steam locomotive.

      Of course, you are quite likely to encounter steam locos in many areas, particularly on summer weekends, due to the large number of heritage railways (and mainline steam excursions)...
      Although the ungated crossings are getting much rarer.

  78. Icons are crap. by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    Use words.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  79. OP is a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only icon there that is questionable is the floppy disk. All the other icons represent things that are still very much in use by people who aren't unemployed parent's-basement dwelling troggs.

  80. Hercules columns and the $ sign by mapuche · · Score: 1

    The $ sign may come from the Hercules Columns:

    http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Columnas_Plus_Ultra.png?uselang=es

    Part of the Spanish heraldics.

  81. radio buttons are inconsistent by cellocgw · · Score: 1

    Just for the record: I've seen plenty of apps (especiallly from those morons in the "computer-based training" business) where the little buttons that are empty circles until you click them to select turn out to be exclusive for one page, and then nonexclusive on the next. "Exclusive" is a true radio button, in that only one can be selected-- clicking one turns the last selection "off" -- and nonexclusive means you can do the infamous "A only -- B only -- A and C -- A and B " answer selection. So basically, as a couple posters pointed out, failure to standardize the meaning and function of an icon is the problem, not the icon itself.

    --
    https://app.box.com/WitthoftResume Code: https://github.com/cellocgw
  82. They're just symbols by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    Icons are just symbols. They don't have to actually look like what they represent, particularly when it is an action. What about those red octagons or yellow triangles at intersections. They don't look like anything they represent and yet they work quite well.

  83. None of threm are past past retirement age! by Snaller · · Score: 1

    This is typical stupidity - it doesn't matter what the icon refers to, what matters is if people understand what it does. Everybody knows what the current ones mean, and new people getting introduced to a computer learn what they mean. If you suddenly start changing that you will confuse everybody already in computers for no valid reason.
    Its like when they started with that kibi byte nonsense.

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  84. Metaphorical context no longer necessary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a bit of a pedantic point but I'm going to make it anyway. It's not that the icons "don't make sense anymore" it's that they origins of the metaphorical meaning are lost. The floppy disk icon still means save to the newer generations they just don't know why it means save. Words and language work the same way and we regularly lose the etymologies of words to time.

    The metaphor was important when we were teaching a generation of people to intuitively use a complex machine that they had no internal context for, that is the general purpose computer. To that end designing a UI around metaphors that these people were comfortable with (e.g. file cabinets) was important to make the learning curve less steep. The newer generations have grown up from childhood with these devices so the metaphor is orders of magnitude less important as they learn these interfaces as they learn any contexts that could otherwise be used as a metaphor. It doesn't mean that the interface couldn't be made better or more intuitive (e.g. phone touch screens) but the idea that the icons "don't make sense" is really inaccurate they just no longer hold the special contextual meaning they did for a group of people trying to understand a new device they didn't grow up around.

  85. Re:"Old people icons" , geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder what the definition of old is for "Old people are the only ones who need icons to map directly to physical objects" poster, the gui environment with icons was introduced to the masses less than 25 years ago (for examples, windows 3 was released in may/1990). There are older gui environments but the availability was limited.

    I am willing to bet though, that as long as documents need to be saved, and the user is working in a gui, that the floppy disk icon will be used. There will be no compelling reason to replace the icon as the majority of users understand what it represents.

    By the way, does anyone know why most stop signs are red and are octagonal in shape?

  86. Pictographs vs alphabet by redelm · · Score: 1

    ... TFA begs the question -- why do we consider any icons make sense? Aren't they just abandoning the invention of the alphabet and reverting to earlier pictographs?

  87. Cute but exaggerated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cute article but largely exaggerated. The floppy disk is surely obsolete as is the voicemail icon which I think really is depicting the cassette in the old answering machines. But most of those other items are either in current use (just walk through Staples to see clipboards and all sorts of envelopes) or pretty recognizable from exposure in films or other media. I mean, most people have probably not seen a horse and buggy in real life but would still easily recognize it.

  88. 10 LET M$ = "Microsoft" by tepples · · Score: 1

    $ is [...] used for strings in BASIC.

    $ is obviously short for 'soft'.

    And the reason it means "soft" is as an allusion to Microsoft's beginning as a publisher of 8-bit BASIC interpreters.

  89. Shutter sound against clandestine panty shots by tepples · · Score: 2

    The other obvious one is camera apps making a shutter sound.

    That's to let the subject know that she is being photographed. Some jurisdictions actually mandate it after the news made a big thing of clandestine panty shots.

    1. Re:Shutter sound against clandestine panty shots by Sarusa · · Score: 1

      I realize the use for something that indicates a picture has been taken. And of course a shutter sound is a convenient audio shortcut - but how many people using these apps have ever owned a camera with a shutter? It's just a nod to old tech. My S95 lets you choose any sound, including a few kinds of beeps and a cat meow.

      I'm guessing that in 50 years (if that long) all photos will just be frames snagged from a hires video stream - which we're seeing already. And at that point if they're still making a "kasheen" noise only a few people will know why other than 'that's the sound photos make'.

      You'll always still have a few people using SLRs of course (I still love my D200), like you've still got people who do glass plate photography.

    2. Re:Shutter sound against clandestine panty shots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that in 50 years (if that long) all photos will just be frames snagged from a hires video stream - which we're seeing already.

      Not exactly. Stills and video often have contradictory goals and requirements, resulting in different settings, optics, and even ergonomics for each. Sure, you can grab frames from video to use as stills just like you can make stop-motion video out of stills (difficulty and quality may vary), but each has its place no matter how much the technology advances. That being said, I can easily envision a future where everything is video-based and people think still photographs are made with special effects because they've never used a device that achieves the same look without additional processing.

  90. Manila Folders by readin · · Score: 1

    We get a nested obscurity with Manila folders. How many people of the generation that started using Manila folders as icons every made a folder from abaca or even knew why the folders were called that?

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  91. The Roman letter "A" is actually an ox head by TarPitt · · Score: 2

    Actually the Phoenician word for ox, they original symbol looked something like an ox head.

    When was the last time anyone ever met a Phoenician? How many people in industrialized countries work with oxen on a daily basis?

    Maybe we should replace "A" with something more current and trendy.

    --
    If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep
  92. Tick mark == approval by tepples · · Score: 1

    I once used a source control system where the icon to commit a change had a document page with a tick mark and an arrow pointing at the page. I'd been using it for several years before I realized what it was supposed to represent

    It's not necessarily rebus. A tick mark represents approval. When you commit a revision, you are approving the changes made in that revision. Where else do you think the term "check in" came from?

    At which point I also realized the same applied to an email client which had an icon with an ticked envelope - 'check mail'.

    That, on the other hand, is a clearer example of the rebus problem you speak of. The "check" here means to poll for new messages, not to express approval, and a tick mark makes no sense.

    So, icons were supposed to be language independent

    Even the tick mark for approval is language dependent. Japanese, for example, more often uses an O for approval and an X for failure.

    I also have a problem with Swedish appliances (washing machines, ovens) which have indecypherable icons for the various modes, and the manual has invariably been lost years ago. If they just labeled the modes in Swedish, at least I'd be able to look up the meanings online.

    Anything made before about 2000, when web-based machine translation services became well known, didn't anticipate the ability to translate Swedish. Perhaps there's a common set of logograms used on European appliances that are just not well known outside Europe.

    1. Re:Tick mark == approval by Clueless+Moron · · Score: 1

      When I grew up in Sweden, tests were marked with "R" for correct and a checkmark for wrong. Then we moved to Canada, and one of my first quizzes was math. I took it up to the teacher, who checked off every question and handed the test back to me with a big smile and the exclamation "good!".

      I was devastated. I sat at my desk completely baffled as to how I could have gotten every question wrong. I was thinking that maybe math is different in Canada. Eventually I went back to the teacher to complain, and after some confusion we were both sorted out.

      So yeah, don't count on checkmark meaning what you think it does to everyone.

  93. Icon means by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    The icon means what the accompanying text says it means. No accompanying text? That's a UI design error because on their own nearly all tiny thumbnail pictures are about as clear as mud.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
  94. When Time Went Backwards by Gim+Tom · · Score: 1

    Back in the dark ages (1980's) IBM mainframe terminals used an analog clock face as the "wait" icon. When Windows came along the hour glass became very popular for pretty much the same thing. I would think that more people in the 1980's knew what an analog clock face was than an hour glass. If you really want some fun with icon images try some of the less mainstream software -- Eagle CAD for circuit board design comes to mind.

  95. Um, What? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Wrenches and Gears - Setup/Settings

    Want to indicate Settings or Setup to a twenty something? Show them a tool they've never used in their lives.

    What makes you think 20 somethings have never seen a screwdriver or a wrench? Those are still common tools that a normal person would be expected to be familiar with.

    1. Re:Um, What? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Those are still common tools that a normal person would be
      > expected to be familiar with.

      "Normal person"? This is Slashdot. The CS majors here are not familiar with actual physical tools at all.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Um, What? by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 2

      Sure they are. How do you think they get computer cases open? Or engage in their various geeky electronic hacking projects?

  96. Re:floppy disc by mcavic · · Score: 1

    Absolutely correct. If you say our icons need to be updated, I say you (or your kids) need a history lesson. Convention exists for a reason, and if you're going to do things differently, it needs to be better for everyone.

  97. Poor Article by Stormy+Dragon · · Score: 1

    The basic point of the article ("Some Icons have outdated images on them! ") has been done numerous times before. But like most articles of the type, it never really address the actual problem and just stops at a Seinfeldesque, "Flopp icons, what's up with that!?"

    Icons need to be pictures that are very easy to identify despite being very small, and still give a ready menmonic suggestion as to their use. Everyone knows that a floppy is an outdated image for a save icon. The problem is that no one can really come up with a good replacement. So why don't you suggest one, Scott Hanselman?

  98. Re:floppy disc by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Emacs FTW!! :D (old farts will know what I mean.)

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  99. Text? What language? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Text only doesn't make sense! Lets say you were from the USA (where knowledge of foreign languages is seen to be bad in some states) and you visit a foreign country (say France). You have to use one of their computers and everything was in French (surprise!). You couldn't use it effectively without icons. With icons you could have a familiar frame of reference to do things. At least you would be better off than with text (French) only!

  100. Well, let's do a test by gman003 · · Score: 1

    I'm probably a decent subject for a "do the damn kids even know what this stuff is anymore?" experiment - I graduate college in a few weeks. I know, I know, that's a hell of a selection bias right from the start, but let's go with it.

    Simple test: go through my smartphone, see if I can ID every icon's source on one particular screen.

    First, the phone itself has a handful of icons. There's an arrow pointing backwards for the general "back/undo" button, a series of lines (with the top extended to the left) for "details/menu", a house for "home page", and a magnifying glass for "search". The first two will never really fail, since they were abstract from the start. Houses still have walls, a floor and a roof, although chimneys may be inexplicable in a few generations. Magnifying glasses are still seen at least on TV, where they're heavily associated with "detectives", making "search" a logical connection. Finally, next to the power button are two logos: a vertical line enclosed in a circle, and a padlock. The former has always mystified me, but is widely-used to mean "power device on/off" (usually, but not always, the circle is broken at the top). The latter, however, is still common enough a sight.

    Next icons are on the notifications bar. First one of those is "unread voicemails", which I can recognize as an old cassette tape, although I definitely associate that more with its icon use than its physical use, and I will concede that some people my age may never have used one. Then is a square with a triangle in it, indicating that the media player is playing, which is pretty much a purely abstract icon. Then are two different sets of bars for Wifi and mobile status, again purely abstract AFAIK.

    Then there's a little image of the phone surrounding by motion lines, indicating "vibrate mode". Since it looks pretty much like the actual device, I can definitely recognize it. Then there's a battery life indicator, and yes, we do know what AAs are. Last notification icon's the "hardest" - an alarm clock, looking like the traditional round analog clocks with the bells on top. I no longer actually use a dedicated alarm clock - I use this phone instead, but the concept of "a distinct device used for keeping time and playing alarms as specified" is not alien to me. Although I never owned an alarm clock shaped like that, I can recognize the round analog "clock", and from there, even without seeing it a million times in pop culture, I could derive "alarm clock" from that.

    The main screen has more icons. There's a plain, old-fashioned computer monitor for my terminal-emulator app, a piece of paper and pencil for my text editor app, a spiral-bound calendar for the calendar app, a set of arithmetic symbols on buttons for my calculator app, and so on. The only ones that someone my age may not recognize are:
    * the old-style red/blue 3D goggles for the "Google Goggles" app
    * the index-card thing for the Contacts app
    * the globe icon for the web browser - nobody calls it the "World Wide Web" anymore, so the connection between "world" and "internet" is now a rather loose one.
    * and fine, I'll go ahead and list the chess board and knights from my chess app, since I know half the people my age never learned to play chess

    Just as a note, on my phone, at least, "Settings" uses a dial, not a set of gears or a wrench. This arguably makes far more sense - a dial is used to change a setting, while gears are what makes something actually work, and a wrench is more used for "assembly" than "configuration".

    There's also a few icons that are *new* and still meaningless - can someone explain the Bluetooth logo?

    Let's go into one app and see what icons are in *it*. For this experiment, lets try the media player app.

    Well, there's a "series of bulleted items" that brings me to the current playlist. Logical. There's two different arrow-based icons for "random" and "repeat", which are also self-explanatory provided you know how abstract arrows work (aside: does anyone know if these abstract ar

  101. dpi going down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The trend to lower dpi is why I am typing this from a 5 year old Dell, I can't buy a replacement laptop today with the same resolution (1920x1200) for my budget of $1200 (what this one cost). Soon my phone will have more pixels than my laptop!

  102. Re:floppy disc by gman003 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Fact: The standards, Unicode in particular, do not specify one or two lines in the "currency symbol". That is left to the font to decide.

    I learned this while setting up a currency database. Apparently Brazil (I think it was Brazil) uses the double-barred symbol for *their* currency, and the single-barred for "US Dollars", which are also in relatively common use. Pretty decent idea for distinguishing currencies, IMO - is sure beats US$ vs CA$, or using ISO 4217 codes.

  103. Re:This line of text is terminated by a "line feed by Nethead · · Score: 1

    That reminds me of a time in high school when we "gained access" to the "computer room" (a teletype in a closet), formed a 2' loop of paper tape with LF chars, and make prank teletype calls around town.

    Ah, the things we would think of before the Internet.

    But I'm old. My first technical job was as an engineer at the local radio station. The AP wire was an actual current loop that feed Baudot to a electro-mechanical printer. (77 baud.)

    --
    -- I have a private email server in my basement.
  104. His point is that icons are 'iconic glyphs'? by glwtta · · Score: 1

    No shit.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  105. Raised by wolves or something? by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

    Seriously, who the f**k doesn't know about wrenches, binoculars, cameras, microphones, magnifying glasses, handset phones, bookmarks, clipboards, and TVs?
    Anybody who lives in the real world, and especially has ever been in an office (include manilla folders here) has seen all of these things still very much in common use.

    Every office I've ever been in has handset desk phones, even if they are VOIP, and manilla folders are quite common there, and in the home for those who need to keep paperwork around (any grownup living in this world).

    Binoculars - Really?????? Who thinks those aren't used anymore? What do you think is replacing them?
    Cameras - Seriously?? Photography is more popular now than ever, with REAL SLRs. Just look around. Envelopes - can't avoid those even if you try; even if you do all your banking and bill-paying online (and some services still aren't there yet) everyone gets greeting cards and junk mail.

    Talk to anyone who ever has to fix anything ever about how wrenches are obsolete. Please do so at a construction site or mechanic shop. Watch hilarity ensue.

    You could make a point about floppies, carbons, MAYBE blueprints (though I still see those used in Facility departments), but the other items? Whose the clueless hipster douchebag who wrote this drivel?

    (I know a guy like that who says watches are obsolete - he just looks at his cell phone. Rather than take my phone out, I simply glance at my wrist, taking a tiny fraction of the time/effort he takes. Yeah, he's smart.)

    --
    We apologize for the inconvenience.
  106. What difference does it make? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This article makes no sense.

    What difference does it make what little picture you click on to get something to happen as long as you know what it means. If you don't know what it means, well, that's what documentation is for. Everyone knows that the current icons mean. What does it matter if a 14 year old has never seen a floppy disk as long as he knows that image means "save"?

    If someone were to suddenly change the save icon to a 3D box being hit by a lightning bolt (simply because he liked lightning) no one would know what it meant until they were told, or they look it up.Ten years later everyone knows that means save but no one will remember where it came from. What does it matter as long as the work still gets done?

    Not many people in the US use blacksmiths anymore, but because large portions of the population play RPGs (either electronic or paper & pencil) most everyone knows that an anvil is usually the symbol for blacksmith. So what difference does it make?

  107. What is "the document": a snapshot or a history? by tepples · · Score: 1

    And finding old revisions could be as simple as scrubbing back through a history bar like watching a video.

    It appears you're talking about permanent storage of arbitrarily detailed revision history of every document. However, this may create a bit of confusion as to the nature of "the document". If you e-mail "a document" to someone else, are you e-mailing a specific revision or the entire revision history? If you copy "a document" to an external drive, are you copying a specific revision or the entire revision history? If both operations are available, how do you communicate the difference between these to the user through the GUI? I seem to remember international news stories about information being leaked through Word documents that come with some of their revision history.

  108. Illiterates post/comment at YouTube by alispguru · · Score: 1

    ... judging from the comments I see there.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  109. Paint programs by tepples · · Score: 1

    How would saving a transcript of the entire revision history of every document on your machine work efficiently in the case of (say) a paint program, in which each brush stroke carries a lot of information? You're looking at X displacement, Y displacement, and possibly pressure, 60 times a second while the mouse or pen is down.

    1. Re:Paint programs by garyebickford · · Score: 2

      Oddly enough, when I worked for Perq I modified the Sketch program, which also had a transcripting feature, to transmit the data over the LAN to another workstation. It worked both directions so two people could draw simultaneously on both copies of the document. :)

      Of course that Sketch program only did black lines & patterns on white background. But it worked fine, even on the early 3 Mbit Ethernet. I would speculate that, using some of the modern ways of modeling shapes (nurbs, quadratic surfaces, etc. - stuff that is used to generate 3D curves, ...) it would not be that difficult or space-consuming in the modern context of memory and disk space. Considering that the brush is moving at human speeds, I think the computer could be constructing the numerics for saving without working too hard. There is a limit, of course. But it's not necessarily required to save every point, only a function that can reconstruct those points.

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    2. Re:Paint programs by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      For every second (or millisecond / microsecond ..) store the changed pixels, deleted pixels and added pixels. For that second, full timestamp needn't be stored if you are stingy with storage space - upto a year granularity would do.

      So needs 32 bits for each second of active editing if pixels are only added. Add thrice the file size for (out of the ass generous guess of )extra data because of storing changed, added as well as deleted pixels every second.

      Doesn't seem excessive, though should not be the default setting for sure.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    3. Re:Paint programs by tepples · · Score: 1

      For every second (or millisecond / microsecond ..) store the changed pixels, deleted pixels and added pixels.

      Which could be several kilobytes for a stroke with a wide brush.

    4. Re:Paint programs by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      You mean several millionths of the new convenient unit of measuring data storage on portable devices and several billionths that on fixed devices?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  110. I Thought This Would Be Interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I'm sure that there are good examples of icons that don't make sense anymore, but this article was just.. wrong? The guy who wrote this is trying to be ahead of the game but he's an idiot. I'll start off by mentioning I'm 17 because age is important here.

    I know what an address book is, I don't use one but I'm in possession of multiple because who knows why. I use bookmarks every day. I've never seen the voicemail icon before but I know what a voicemail machine is we used one on my home phone when I was younger. Um manila folders? Haha what the fuck? I'm not even gonna say anything about that.
    Home phone. Okay yeah eventually those might die out but most everyone has them right now. Everyone definitely know what they are whether or not they use them much. I don't touch mine, but they're more uniformly designed than cell phones so they make more sense as an icon. Sure magnifying glass/binoculars are true but not relevant to the title. Envelopes? Pretty sure I know about those things. Also I'm pretty sure every 20 year old knows what a screwdriver is. I'm pretty sure every 4 year old knows what a screwdriver is. In fact, I'm pretty sure that will always be true for a very long time because I see no reason that the screwdriver won't be around in 100 years. It's simple and it works. Then it says that the microphone is an "old stlye microphone." Not only would anyone recognize that, that's not an "old style microphone." I record music, I have multiple microphones that look like that. That's not outdated they still make microphones that.. have stands and are rounded? Why wouldn't they? Polaroids? You're 10 years off. I mean sure they're rare now but everyone knows what they are. Even if you didn't, it'd just look like a photograph so the icon would still make sense. No my TV doesn't have rabbit ears but I have friends whose TVs do, even if I'd never seen one before it still looks like a TV so it makes sense. Carbon copies? I've made carbon copies. I also know what a blueprint is, I've made blueprints in high school in tech classes. Never seen carbon copies used as an icon before I guess it's used as a term in emails but that's not necessarily an icon.

    Basically what I'm saying is this article was a load of crap.

  111. Re:This line of text is terminated by a "line feed by kermidge · · Score: 1

    Nice. Had forgotten much of it. We used a surplus teletype through a bread-boarded interface to our recently completed Altair... worked fine, circa '79.

  112. Re:What is "the document": a snapshot or a history by nschubach · · Score: 1

    It's a good question. Perhaps each file could have a separate history file. If you copy the history of that document along with the document, someone could scrub through your edit history. Most of the time, you're going to be sending only the latest revision. However, the history file could include a marker designating where in your history the document was closed (or currently open to) and allow you to send a prior version. It should be fairly transparent to the average user, but I have no problem letting someone advanced pop open a dialog allowing them to send any arbitrary revision. (In fact, I encourage apps have "advanced" options for those that really dig into the application itself.)

    --
    Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  113. at sign by xded · · Score: 1

    You forgot the @ sign, today probably even more widespread than the ampersand.

    We're not even sure where does it come from, but it doesn't look to me that we stopped using it.

  114. Handset resurgence by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Actually I've had a handset for a year, because VoIP is offered with virtually no added cost. But I had some pioneering offer from the ISP, now more and more widespread, where voice calls to mobile phones are already included in my internet bill (36 EUR per month). So I can call them for free! it even works properly now that I've increased sensibility on the ISP box's web interface. People couldn't fucking hear me before.

    The handset is comfortable enough (it's a piece of crap I picked up somewhere), is a useful back up in case of cell phone failure or loss, and I can give the land phone number to people I wouldn't want to have my cell phone number. A win-win-win situation.

    In a professionnal or community setting, you can connect an old handset to a computer or a VoIP box, and rent a SIP "line" for one euro per month. or outright buy an IP phone which comes with, you guessed it, a real handset. Everyone in your company gets a desk phone with a real phone number, for a total cost similar to what one land line used to cost. Oh, and in the far future it's probable you could just pick up any handset regardless of who it belongs to and use it with one of your personal identities.

  115. Re:floppy disc by Yobgod+Ababua · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Emacs? Pshaw I say! You and your fancy python bindings and X-integration... it's all a bunch of useless modern folderol! Pshaw again!

    vi at holds closer to it's respectable ed antecedents, but I don't hold much truck with that "new vi" nonsense.

    When -we- used to program you had to carry your case of hand-punched cards to the datacenter... in the snow... uphill... BOTH WAYS.

    Dang fools come around talking up emacs and taking on airs... don't rightly got no sense in their heads.

  116. Ironicly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The save button itself should have been deprecated years ago. Documents and files should have been saved automatically and stored in a searchable manner. The whole idea of storing "files" in "folders" is so 1970's. Alan Cooper said as much back in 1995 ( http://www.amazon.com/About-Face-Essentials-Interface-Design/dp/1568843224 ), but only in the last couple years have OSs even attempted something like this (Lion's Universal Autosave feature), and even they don't do it terribly well.

    1. Re:Ironicly by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Distributed version control should be the unspoken default for all data. The insistence on keeping the "save" mode has interfered with getting to that practice as the default.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

  117. Re:floppy disc by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Just to continue this thread, it's been said that the original Emacs was written in TECO, the DEC-10 editor, which also had full access to the operating system's deepest function calls. TECO makes Emacs look like a paragon of user interface perfection. IIRC one of the TECO commands was 'delete line', and the upper case version of the same command was 'reboot' - a rather brute force method of deleting a line.

    For those inquiring minds, Here's the link. A quote might be sufficient:

    TECO does not really have syntax; each character in a program is an imperative command, dispatched to its corresponding routine. That routine may read further characters from the program stream (giving the effect of string arguments), change the position of the 'program counter' (giving the effect of control structures), or push values onto a value stack (giving the effect of nested parentheses). But there is nothing to prevent operations like jumping into the middle of a comment, since there is no syntax and no parsing.
    A classic essay on computer programming, Real Programmers Don't Use Pascal, suggested that a common game for TECO fans was to enter their name as a command sequence, and then try to work out what would happen. The same essay in describing TECO coined the acronym "YAFIYGI", meaning "You Asked For It You Got It" and thus being the antitheses of WYSIWYG ("What You See Is What You Get").

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
  118. Need new icon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Need new sound to represent "icon".
    Need new alphabet to represent that sound.

  119. So I'm guessing the author is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...twelve or so?

    I can understand someone never having seen a floppy. And possibly a microphone (although there are digital ones in that shape). But a screwdriver and wrench? Seriously? A manilla folder? That just sounds insane to me.

  120. Re:floppy disc by TheABomb · · Score: 1

    Old woman!

    --
    MSIE: The world's most standards-complaint web browser.
  121. going on for 5000 years in ideographic languages by peter303 · · Score: 1

    In the beginning most original symbols were picto-grams or small drawings of what they represented. Probably even in the first generation of scribes pictograms were borrowed as phoneto-gram "sounds like" for more abstract words. Then combined to represent more nuanced ideas. Then sounds changed, but the ideograph remained the same. Then ideograms became styles, e.g. blocky for both cuneform and Chinese or simplified. Or origins just plain forgotten after centuries of use.

    Chinese is a second language to me. When you learn the characters the only sure thing is to memorize thier shape, drawing sequence and pronunciation(s) [ yes a few have multiple pronunciations ]. But there are clues to the meaning and sound in a majority of the characters, probably due to their history.

  122. welcome to the world children by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your language is full of anachronisms. What makes you think icons won't be too? We need a common symbology to communicate.

  123. What's a "Disk"? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Nobody ever sees a "disk" (round rotating storage hardware), why do we still call them that? Especially since you're probably saving to a Flash drive, not a disk at all.

    And what's a "dial" I'm supposed to use when I hear a "dial tone"? Though I guess I hear a dial tone only on antiquated desktop phones, that I see only in an office.

    And what "wires" are they referring to when they say my network or phone are "wireless"?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  124. Chinese Characters by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Chinese characters, each of which represents a word or phrase, are evolved versions of icons that more or less literally represented their original meaning, from which the current meaning is derived. Very few Chinese people who use them every day have any idea what the original icon looked like. In many cases the original thing the icon represented either no longer exists, is far from common in use (especially in modern cities), or has evolved into a meaning at best barely recognizable.

    Likewise most modern English words are derived from original words that would be totally unrecognized by modern speakers, especially the many foreign (French, Norse, Greek, Latin, etc) ones.

    It's true that lots of icons aren't good ways to indicate their function based on recognizing the original object. But that's not how languages actually work.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  125. Re:floppy disc by drkim · · Score: 1

    When you talk about the $ sign, I remember when it was a U interwoven with a S (for "US"). Lazy 90 year olds.

  126. Re:floppy disc by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    UIs have indeed gone downhill a bit. The Public Storage website provides a typical example. They use orange or else light gray text on a white background, rendering contrast down to terrible levels. The default font size for data fields is tiny too. The readability is terrible and nobody there cares.

    I attribute this to companies hiring the youngest and cheapest labor they can (and the least experienced), or offshoring dev.

    In general UIs are in poor times. The Microsoft Ribbon's issues with consistency of access to functions is a large demonstration of this. (One of many examples: numbering functions in Word can be approached multiple ways in the UI, and some ways/paths omit critical settings the other paths have, leaving the user clueless how to do what he needs to do.) Marketers or hotshot visual designers run the show, and the result slaps the user in the face repeatedly.

    As far as icons go, those trying to free them from their history are not considering the human perception issue. It's like some 17 year old who doesn't like red and green traffic lights and has the power to replace them with the words "CAN HAZ WALK?" and "RUN DOOD RUN".

  127. Who'll even notice? by tepples · · Score: 1

    Whereas it's easy to find a previous revision now, particularly if you didn't save the specific version that you're looking for under a separate filename? Come now. Search for changes by date and time. Search for changes that add or remove specific phrases. Display overall document length as a function of time. Zoomable, scrollable display of changes over time, with annotated marks at each 'save' point.

    What percent of users are likely to learn to make the most of such a rich revision history viewer? What other applications index the revision history, and how much use does this feature see?

    The twentieth century called; they want their storage technology back. Hard drives don't have to spin anymore.

    Though they don't have to, they still do for cost reasons in most home computers that aren't A. premium-priced laptops or B. ARM-powered and touch-controlled. Until SSDs that meet the recommended system requirements for the latest version of Windows for x86-64 become dirt cheap, your average entry-level desktop or laptop PC will still have platters.

    Use the 'save' button to insert an annotation in the editing history instead of creating or fixing a file.

    And you still run into the problem of unwanted disclosure of editing history to the recipient of a document.

  128. Stop signs? by GoChickenFat · · Score: 1

    While were talking about accomodating the younger generations maybe we should also get rid of road signs as they seem too busy texting while driving to notice them as well. Is there an app for that?

  129. ... like the body or the subject!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    /. topic icons often are nonsense as well but who cares? Why need to made an revolution for that? :P

  130. Ideagrams by Flwyd · · Score: 1

    At a company where no one seemed to have any graphic design skills and our toolbars were a random collection of misappropriated icons from various open source projects, I suggested we just use Chinese characters for everything. Our users are gonna have to attend training to figure out what the button's for anyway

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature.
  131. The desktop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    doesn't make a whole lot of sense anymore and it's slowly being phased out. The idea that an OS was a virtual office was the reason for the office metaphor, desktop (of a typical office desk), file cabinet - Windows 3.1

    That was a necessary lineage to get people to move away from the traditional file cabinets of steel. They couldn't just call it a workspace (desktop) or a database (file cabinet) because they are new terms and would require people that are set in their ways to change their ways.

    Of course, given x amount of processing power, HD displays, multi-touch, motion sensors (Wii, Kinect etc.) we can potentially change the whole way we work. Why do we even have desks. We sit down in an ape-like position with hunched backs. I liked how in a clip of Prometheus (movie) it featured a gut standing up at the controls as he flew the ship. Who's to say we should even be in the medium of air to work - why not water sometimes for some scenarios?

    The technology comes on the scene but the paradigm shift doesn't until some times later.

    IMO, redundancy is the future. Multiple systems running in parallel doing thing simultaneously or using their redundant power to do it better than necessary. Everyone is useful and active to make things more stream-lined than they need to be and if, just IF something terrible goes wrong, all that redundancy just might save the day and allow things to keep ticking along.

    In order for that to happen, we need to create a system based on using the most of what you have in the most efficient way. Nothing or noone is wasted. You have to be algorithmic in terms of getting the very most oof the maximum number of people efficiently. People were never told or warned that the world is overpopulated and should be allowed to play a roll in it's reduction without having to expunge themselves.

    I don't defend the right to have as many children as you want. We don't live in that fantasy reality. We have to respect that there are people who are powerful who don't want that. But so too, should they respect the right of people to have a child and even a second one if something should happen to that chile or the parents win a lottery.

    Only honest dialogue, and fair, automatic, algorithmic, non-human, untempered compromise can get us there at any decent rate.

    This world is loaded up with crap and we are not being given the power to undo it. We are not presented with an ultimatum.There is no honest discourse. There is no 'reality' summit. It's all dishonesty and treachery and that gets nobody nowhere.

    & we have the technology to fix it..

  132. it's not about how they look like... by l3v1 · · Score: 1

    It's (should not be) just about what these - and other - icons look like, but more about what they represent and mean. It shouldn't matter that some of the objects/concepts depicted are not fashionable or used that much anymore, the only thing that should matter is that computer using people know what functionality they represent. And I've yet to meet people who don't know that.

    It's pretty hard to find pictograms that are ageless. And since we still use a variety of devices and OSes (thank god, but who knows how long will it stay this way), and such fundamental changes would need to be accepted and used by all of them, otherwise you could indeed end up in a situation where people wouldn't know what functionality an icon represents on another OS. It would all become a mess.

    I prefer to think of this - using historical pictorams in icons - as being reminded of computing history, and I don't really see any real reason in changing e.g. the save icon, or the copy/paste icons, etc. It would make absolutely no sense to change the floppy to an sdcard or something, because these technologies fade out faster than they appear. And you don't want to create an environment where icon pictograms need to be changed every 1-2 years to follow device and storage developments. I'm sorry but that would be simply insane.

    Going for text menus only or going for the Ubuntu HUD is also a bit retarded, since while sometimes can be somewhat cool, most of the times is just a hindrance of real work and reduces your effectivity.

    --
    I am putting myself to the fullest possible use, which is all I can think that any conscious entity can ever hope to do.
  133. Its only symbols by garphik · · Score: 1

    Its only symbolic representation of the thing its like a language people have developed from relevant objects and people have learnt and got used to. I wonder what he would comment about the hieroglyphics??

  134. Re:This line of text is terminated by a "line feed by Inda · · Score: 1

    If only you'd started your post with "So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time."

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  135. Re:floppy disc by tom17 · · Score: 1

    Wow, I only just noticed that the fonts only have 1 bar. I have always written it with 2.

    I am not even from this continent, only been using $ for about 4 years now, I just never thought about it before.

  136. How brilliantly insightful by Ptolemy+Too · · Score: 1

    How can it be that no one has ever noticed this before? Someday, maybe this guy will get lucky and invent sex.

  137. How about we replace them with: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about we replace them with the correct terminology? Save, Save As, Search, or where the Hell did I put it? Speaking of search, how about bringing back the search on content?

  138. WHAT a COUNTRY! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    In Korea, only old people use GUIs.
    Youngsters let Siri take care of everything.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  139. Kadir beneath Mo Moteh by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    Darmok, where he saves his data

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  140. Strokes per document and documents per device by tepples · · Score: 1

    [A log of each stroke in a document] could be several kilobytes for a stroke with a wide brush.

    You mean several millionths of the new convenient unit of measuring data storage on portable devices

    Multiply by the average number of strokes in a document and by the number of documents of that type on a device, and then consider how much of your storage you want to devote to every document's revision history. Then consider doing the same with audio or video.

    1. Re:Strokes per document and documents per device by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Which is why the data structure you suggest is not optimal and storing per second diff is more efficient as well as directly proportional to the duration of enjoyment afforded by the document.

      And like I said, should not be default.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
  141. How responsive is revision browsing? by tepples · · Score: 1

    finding previous revisions is not as tedious as you suggest, since you can literally scroll back through them and observe the changes being made.

    I can't try it myself because I don't know anyone who owns a Mac that runs Lion. So before I buy one to try it out, how long does it take for the computer to access each position on the scroll bar? Consider scrolling from day one to the middle of the history to the end and back. Is it smooth and fluid, or is there a delay of several seconds?

    1. Re:How responsive is revision browsing? by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      It takes several seconds on activating, but after that it's relatively fluid, with past revisions filling in quickly as you go through your history (you can see them loading, admittedly, but it is generally well under a second). If you're asking how long it would take to scroll straight through from the beginning to the end and back, I couldn't really answer that, since Lion's versioning system integrates into Time Machine and will pull revisions from Time Machine backups as well, meaning that they could go back for years. The interface itself is nearly identical to Time Machine's too, so if you're at all familiar with that feature, you already have a sense for how this one works. It's definitely on the flashy side as far as UIs go, but it's quite a pleasure to use when the occasion arises.

  142. Re:Old Icons by hutsell · · Score: 1

    Oldest Icons are made in Ancient Asian writings. One day it will be no.1 again. I no lie. They ROR. :)

    --
    Yesterday's Weirdness is Tomorrow's Reason Why
  143. Arrows. by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    If we're talking about icons, let's think a bit further and discuss other metaphors. Anyone really know what an arrow symbol comes from? Most people probably don't or they just forgot (this is a guess), but we all get the meaning of "it's pointing to something" behind it.

    By the way, in case you were wondering, the arrow symbol was derived from, well, actual arrows from bows. An arrow always has a destination, just like the symbolic arrows.

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  144. symbols, expressions, characters... wtv by luxlloth · · Score: 1

    Actually, they turn out just like old expressions from the written/spoken language: they're there, we know what they mean, we just don't necessarily know why. I understand that someone might feel like it's quite the deal, but it's not something that hasn't ever happened before. We deal with it every day. Heck, entire language systems were "built" upon pictographic representations that aren't that obvious now. The only difference, I suppose, is the speed at which this is all happening; that we can actually see rather than imagine what it must have been like.

  145. Re:"Old people icons" , geez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 3 was hardly the first gui environment introduced to the masses. The Macintosh, for example, was released in 1984, some 6 years before Windows 3. (I do, however, agree that Windows 3 is the first GUI in *its* particular genetic line which is worth discussing. I've used a computer with Windows 1.0 and 2.0 on it. Ick.)

  146. Bollocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason english is the default technical language is because of the dominance of the US economy on the world's playing field since the end of the second world war. Everything else mentioned above is plain bollocks. For one, English is not the only dynamic language in the world.

  147. They're part of our history. by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    Forget it at your own peril.

  148. Re:floppy disc by phunster · · Score: 1

    This line escpecially resonated with me, "Actually, modern interfaces are confusing as hell because user interface design has become so screwed up"

  149. Re:floppy disc by Summitlake · · Score: 2

    Amen. The real problem here is a clown who doesn't know what an 'icon' really means. It's not just a pretty picture. That's why the Treasury doesn't change the $ you mentioned just because an unemployed graphic artist needs a job designing a "more modern" symbol to confuse 100,000,000 users still earning dollars. Sony tried getting creative with icons, and look what happened to them.

  150. faces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    people are wired since birth to quickly recognize faces. a good experiment would be to devise a test if people recognize faces for icons quicker than conventional icons after learning them with the text above the icon and then timing it with just mouse-over after learning the icons.

    1. Re:faces by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      of course, this would only be useful for common functions used frequently. otherwise, you'd have no idea what the face represents unless perhaps the person had a symbol or something.

  151. Re:floppy disc by Summitlake · · Score: 1

    Interesting. Right. When I was younger - yeah, we chipped them out of stone - the dollar sign DID have two vertical slashes and we were trained to write it that way. Today, the double slash is so rare it might look odd. Mind you, far as I know, it took half a century to make that transition.

  152. Why does it matter? by Meski · · Score: 1

    People know what they represent, there's no need to alter them to something that they aren't going to know. (Although microsorft do this anyway - hey! its a new version! Lets change everything, and move it)

  153. Binoculars, gears, and envelops are mysterious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    !?

  154. Laugh while you can, sonny boy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someday soon it'll be your resume that goes stright into the bit bucket.

  155. leave the icons alone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aragorn to Frodo: Notice the strange glyphs beside the door? This door is magically sealed.
    Gandalf: Step aside. I shall try to open it.
    (an hour later)
    Frodo to Aragon: What's taking so long?
    Aragon to Frodo: Gandalf must touch the glyphs in the right order to open the door.

    Gandalf to Pippin: Peregrin Took! Put down my staff! A wizard's staff is no toy to be fooled with!
    If you accidentally touched the right sequenced of glyphs (flat buttons on the side of the staff) you might have hit someone with a lightning bolt! (laser fire)
    Also, if you had somehow fumbled and managed to break the staff it would have caused a devastating explosion (power cell inside staff loses containment and explodes)