Slashdot Mirror


IT Positions Some of the Toughest Jobs To Fill In US

coondoggie writes "Forty-nine percent of U.S. companies are having a hard time filling what workforce management firm ManpowerGroup calls mission-critical positions within their organizations. IT staff, engineers and 'skilled trades' are among the toughest spots to fill. The group surveyed some 1,300 employers and noted that U.S. companies are struggling to find talent, despite continued high unemployment, over their global counterparts, where 34% of employers worldwide are having difficulty filling positions."

65 of 886 comments (clear)

  1. Salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe they are hard to fill because they dont pay enough?

    1. Re:Salaries by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Impossible. As everybody skilled in economics knows, there are no low salaries, only lazy workers.

    2. Re:Salaries by captbob2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That seems to be the case that I see. Positions that want YEARS of experience, long lists of certifications, and pay around $34,000.

      Same with any other area, there is no shortage of people wanting jobs, there *is* a shortage of people wanting to be slaves. Shouldn't "market forces" tell these "job creators" that they are not paying enough?

    3. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, that and they are often some of least respected positions in the U.S. There are plenty of people in I.T. fed up with the fact that while it isn't really a "dead end" job, you are always in a bad situation. If you're bad at your job, you just eventually lose it. If you are good at your job, some places will be scared to advance you or, since being good at your job really mean more idle time in I.T., they'll claim it's a place to cut and STILL fire you. There's also that pesky fact that many of the baldy suits can't understand what you do.

      The way I.T. has been handled over the years by the management types is a prime problem in getting people in to the jobs. The I.T. people are smart and they see the "creative" people get respect and they see the pointy-head management get overpaid. It's no surprise that it would lose it's appeal.

    4. Re:Salaries by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what you say is you take what the non-technical people say back to the technical people. Couldn't the technical people just talk to the technical people directly?

    5. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      While interpersonal skills are important, in many jobs I've had there is WAY too much emphasis put on them. I personally believe this is because it is a skillset that a manager can understand while the non-technical types don't understand the technical competence. For certain I.T. people and programming-types it's much more important, IMHO, that they understand the technical side as 95% of their job should be in front of the computer (this is excepting support personnel that have to deal with the public). I've seen quite a number of work situations where it is the other way around.

    6. Re:Salaries by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

      So what you say is you take what the non-technical people say back to the technical people. Couldn't the technical people just talk to the technical people directly?

      I'm a PEOPLE PERSON, DAMMIT!

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    7. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Market forces are warped. That is what happens when you can buy laws and that is what is happening now. It's pathetic to see people scream at the free market and purchase legislators at the same time.

    8. Re:Salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I deal with the god damn customers so the engineers don't have to. I have people skills; I am good at dealing with people. Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you?

    9. Re:Salaries by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Insightful

      there are enough people willing to be slaves.

      Yeah, all you have to do is get them H1B visas.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    10. Re:Salaries by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't buy that.
      I think it comes down to $$$. Same reason Jobs put Apple factories overseas to save ~$25 per iPod.

      If the hidden-camera videos on youtube are accurate, the companies DON'T want to find U.S. workers, but instead collect resumes (per requirements of U.S. law) simply to throw them in the trash afterwards. Their real mission is to claim "we can't find any locals" to the Congress, so they can apply for temporary visas to import cheaper workers from overseas.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    11. Re:Salaries by chill · · Score: 4, Funny

      So, you don't physically take the specs from the customer? Does your secretary do that, or are they faxed?

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:Salaries by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Informative

      I hire and supervise technical staff for a living (although it's a small enough team that I'm chipping in on the tech work as well).

      I can manage somebody with fantastic technical skills but without people skills if (a) I can put him in a proverbial cave where I can keep the non-techies away from him and him away from non-techies, and (b) other techies can work with him. I would rather have somebody with great personal skills too, but if it comes down to technical skill versus people skill, I'll take the technical skill.

      You can train people skills too: you sit your problem employee down and tell him exactly what your expectations for personal behavior are, and what you need him to do differently. You be specific about what behavior is inappropriate or problematic, and tell him what you need him to do differently. If you start seeing changes in the right direction, you encourage it by telling him what he did right.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    13. Re:Salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry, I don't buy your argument.

      If you strike possessing security clearance from the listed of mandatory requirements, and change it to "must be able to obtain a security clearance", your field of candidates will open up. Yes, you will have to pay for someone to get cleared, and that is not cheap, but there is an acute shortage of information security practitioners as it is.

      The reality is IS pro's with TS/SCI clearance command a premium due to the insatiable demand from the U.S. Government and firms that do business with the same.

    14. Re:Salaries by dkleinsc · · Score: 4, Funny

      Look. I already told you: I deal with the god damn non-techies so the techies don't have to. I have people skills; I am good at dealing with people. Can't you understand that? What the hell is wrong with you people?

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    15. Re:Salaries by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wrong. What you meant to say was:

      "Impossible. As every MBA knows, there are no low salaries, only lazy workers."

      It's not economists who are running these companies.

    16. Re:Salaries by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only problem I have with this conspiracy theory is that it might be true for some giant company like MS or Intel which has political connections and hires lots of H1Bs, but it surely can't be true for some piddly little 500-person (or even 3000-person) company. The smaller companies don't have a lot of political connections, and time is of the essence to them; they can't wait the time needed to get a bunch of temporary visas to import cheaper workers, in fact the smaller companies usually don't seem to have any imported workers in my experience. Yet I still see lots of ridiculous requirements in job requisitions from smaller companies.

    17. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Informative

      The videos aren't really very hidden camera. In fact they can be quite open about it.

    18. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This is interesting because what you are saying here is to actually **develop** your workforce.

      Most corporations don't want to do that anymore.

    19. Re:Salaries by mark-t · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not to mention the jobs that want 10 years experience programming in languages that aren't even 10 years old.

      I've actually seen this, in fact.

      I've been a professional game developer for quite a few years now, but during my last bout of unemployment between jobs (in 2010), I remember seeing a Craigslist job ad asking for somebody with 5 years of iPhone game programming experience.

      When I had graduated in 2003 and was actually looking for an entry level position, I came across one ad wanting a senior Linux administrator with 15 or more years of Linux experience. Another ad that I saw wanted 5 years of Java Swing programming experience (while I understand that actually may have been barely possible, it would have probably required that one have previously been an actual Sun employee).

    20. Re:Salaries by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Apparently strong network security (packet/protocol level) + network operations background + minor software development + security clearance is an impossible combination to find.

      Ya think?
      - Network security person + clearance. One job.
      - NOC ops + clearance. One job.
      - Part time software development. One job, either part time or contract.

      Don't complain that you can't find somebody stupid enough to attempt to do all three jobs. If they already have their security clearance then their BS filter works just as good as your resume filter. There is no shortage of open jobs that are SINGLE jobs requiring security clearance.

      I've seen my own share of job postings where it is clear the job will be a nightmare just by the way they word it. The classics are like yours, listing multiple full time jobs as a single job, and then mentioning overtime will be requested for the salaried position.

      --
      //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    21. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've bought specialized software from some small home-grown companies of 3-4 programmers with at least 50% of the programmers being H1b. Yes it isn't evidence, but it does happen more than you think.

    22. Re:Salaries by Githaron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is why they are having trouble finding anyone. It is also probably why the day of the company/employee loyalty relationship has largely disappeared.

    23. Re:Salaries by farrellj · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Too many job ads are looking for insane amount of skills in one person...They ask for a "Unix Admin" person who knows how to code in C++, C#, manage an Asterisk server, install mange & tune 1000 RHEL servers, use NAGIOS, maintain a SAP system, automate sysadmin tasks using bash/ksh/perl/PHP/C/C++, setup and manage IIS & Apache, admin websphere & coldfusion, install manage and tune Windows 2003/2008/2008R2, manage VMware/vSphere/ESX/ESXi servers, perform second level support for Windows users, manage printers, travel onsite for servicing, be on call 24/7 (for no extra pay), and be able to interact like a jolly good fellow with customers, co-works and management, oh, and write documentation and explain things as well as Carl Sagan could.

      Offered pay: $40,000-50,000/year

      Sure...lots of people like that...and all are willing to do it for $40,000 a year

      I don't think so...

      But it gets worse!

      If you don't put all the appropriate keywords they want, they won't even look at your resume, even if you could do all the things they ask for...for example, I had one recruiter, after seeing I had installed, patched, secured, put on line and monitored Solaris servers, ask me if I had ever configured a Solaris system. I explained that what I had listed includes "configuration", but he refused to send the customer my resume until I added "configured" to the sentence.

      Then you get past the HR people...and you end up with a trivia contest from the tech people...who only know one way of doing things since they learned it by rote ...so if you don't do it their way, you don't get the job...

      Am I bit bitter at this point in my job search? Yes, just a tad. 10+ years Linux/Unix admin experience...and still can't get a job!

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    24. Re:Salaries by Captain+Hook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The only problem I have with this conspiracy theory is that it might be true for some giant company like MS or Intel which has political connections and hires lots of H1Bs

      I think it's an ecosystem problem, if a significant proportion of the IT jobs are being replaced via off-shoring or outsourcing to inshore companies who don't pay as well then for every job lost you've also lost a person keeping their skills up to date and then the next generation see whats happening and say "fuck that, I'll get an MBA instead".

      To start with it probably doesn't have a big affect but by the time you start losing the veterans to promotion and retirement after 10-15 years and haven't got their replacement already trained with some experience then it's too late. You need a certain critical mass of people interested in a career to keep it going or skills will be lost and once they are gone it's incredibly hard to get back at a national level.

      You need people entering the IT careers at the bottom, to have some exposure to different IT career streams and for them to have a certain expectation of being able to develop a life long career out of it, and I don't think anyone really believes that will happen any more.

      It's a self fulfilling prophecy which benefits those to have the ability to influence job markets at the expense of those who don't.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    25. Re:Salaries by vlm · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can train people skills too: you sit your problem employee down and tell him exactly what your expectations for personal behavior are, and what you need him to do differently. You be specific about what behavior is inappropriate or problematic, and tell him what you need him to do differently. If you start seeing changes in the right direction, you encourage it by telling him what he did right.

      Assuming you know what a RFC is, you write him a RFC. He will follow it. It'll probably look a lot like the old TCP and IP RFCs. "no evil bit" in any datagram, keep your TCP buffers small, sensible retry protocol if no response (not launch a ICBM), has something like ARP to figure out who to contact instead of flailing around or broadcasting spam mail to the whole universe, some kind of loop free spanning tree like topology to transfer problems around, semi-standardized handshaking protocol to initial and end conversation streams... Come to think of it, over the decades, networking/network programming guys have been the easiest to get along with of all techies I've known, from internalizing this kind of stuff.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    26. Re:Salaries by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Depends on the size of the company. If you're a ten-person team, that could reasonably be one job because the time spent on any one of those tasks could easily be way less than a full-time position.

      That said, as soon as you add the security clearance requirement, your applicant pool dries up. There's no good way around that unless you actively poach from other companies in your field. If you're big enough to do that, you're big enough for those to each be separate positions.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    27. Re:Salaries by RobbieCrash · · Score: 4, Funny

      Let's see you do your job when you can't find your Any key.

      --
      Keep on knockin'
      https://robbiecrash.me
    28. Re:Salaries by jythie · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *nods* since it is often MBAs doing the hiring, they tend to want people like themselves.. extroverted and people-centric.. the problem is people like that generally go get MBAs or other people oriented degrees rather then technical degrees. When engineers are in charge of hiring other engineers things tend to go smoother.

    29. Re:Salaries by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > ...more productive people...

      BUZZ. Thank you. Your whole point is lost by such ignorant language.

      I.T. people keep the organization running from day to day. To pull a Neil Boortz and start to whine about the "productive class" means your opinion should be roundfiled and proves that our upset about the MBA scam is justified.

      I'd bet the first person you reflexively call is one of those "unproductive" people.

    30. Re:Salaries by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd be on board with this if I didn't so often see middle and upper management call "IT" a money-sink. If they actually knew what their IT departments did, they'd be able to quantify it, and recognize that IT departments DO "contribute substantively to the bottom line". They just do it by removing red numbers instead of adding black ones. Saving money and increasing overall productivity is just as important as bringing new money in; perhaps more important, as without the infrastructure, new money can't be targeted.

      This comes from a guy who runs his own small business, so no, I don't have a general hard-on for IT. I just know that "important" and "valued" aren't necessarily the same thing for the crop of MBAs I've dealt with in the past.

    31. Re:Salaries by pnutjam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like you need to work on your project management skills. You have promised a product in a specific timeline when you have no ability to create this product. Meanwhile, you probably underbid someone who could have actually provided said product.

    32. Re:Salaries by sycodon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm going to call it an HR problem.

      First, the IT people trend heavily to being introverts and poor people skills in general. So they are pretty much ineffective when it comes to recruiting talent.

      Second, HR has no idea what IT needs, either in skills or personality. So they resort to a list of buzzwords. Anyone who has ever applied to a state position has gone through being rejected because they lacks a single buzzword in their resume, or,. are one month shy of the experience requirements.

      So on the Can't Find Talent statement, I call the ultimate bullshit. They aren't looking and when they do find someone, they stupidly screen them out on stupid, irrelevant requirements.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    33. Re:Salaries by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Coworkers"

    34. Re:Salaries by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Simple solution to get management to understand the value of IT have a no IT day. One day, no email, internet, IP phone etc. They'll come back crying before lunch time.

    35. Re:Salaries by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because technical people talking to technical people will eventually lead to one of only two possibilities: one tech yelling "Godwin!" and storming off in disgust, or both techs intently studying napkin schematics, hammering out the best way to construct a real life light saber.

    36. Re:Salaries by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Do you have a reference from an MBA text book to point this out? I didn't get taught any of that with my MBA.

      Economics 101 Supply and Demand with Substitution.

      Your salary is based on the Supply of available workers and the Demand for that type of work. (which under this condition would show that IT workers should be paying a lot more) Then you have Substitution, meaning while there is a lot of Demand and short Supply the Companies have substitution available.

      Lets say a DBA. I good DBA is an excellent asset to a company. They can extract data and find information that you didn't even know you had, you can get your systems running really fast. Now however if you don't have that DBA depending on the company size how much are they loosing with Excel Files and Access Databases, and people who have to do a lot of time intensive work. So the DBA will need to compete with the inferior substitution because if his salary is too high, it isn't worth it, because there may be alternate methods.

      In my area DBA's get good money because they are valuable. However if you are a just a programmer it isn't that their work is easier or they are lazier, but because there are more available, so that means their prices are less.

      Now if you prove yourself a hard worker, (and the company is using proper HR policies), The company will see your value as greater and give you a raise, and try harder to retain you. Because there is a demand for a hard worker and less of supply of such.

      Now a lot of companies will try to dig from the bottom of the barrel to try to find a Diamond in the rough "A really good employee for cheap" now this is a method of disaster, however that is what they do, because their cash is tight.

      The MBA classes do teach that the higher you pay a person the harder they will work (not the opposite) however, most of these MBA's you talk about are not MBA's but some guy with a AB or BB degree. and just because they are in a higher position, you figure they are MBAs.

      That is an MBA and Basic Economists analysis of why the salaries are the way they are.

       

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    37. Re:Salaries by s.petry · · Score: 5, Funny

      Partially correct, but you are missing the most important thing gone awry in IT today.

      Dear company,

      While I understand you have vast needs in the IT area, and wish to do less with more there are limits to human capacity. I can not fill the role of Senior Unix Analyst/Engineer/Architect, Network Analyst/Engineer/Architect, MS Windows Analyst/Engineer/Architect, Storage SAN/NAS Analyst/Engineer/Architect, Firewall and Security Analyst/Engineer/Architect any more than you would expect your CPA to be your attorney, business analyst and lead sales person. You need to pick one or two of these things, preferably what I have spent twenty years mastering and allow me to do my job.

      I also understand that you have developers that read trade magazines and demand that they have what they read about. This has created workplaces that are impossible to support. There should be no more than three versions of any Operating system on site and those should be limited to not more than 2 types of Linux. One for development, one for production, and one for legacy. Allow your IT staff to keep your development on track, give us the reigns and watch how fast you can go and how far you can drive.

      Lastly, contrary to popular belief IT people enjoy time away from work and the office. We do not like to be on call 24/7/365 with no bonuses and no breaks. We expect to be treated with the same respect as the Corporate Lawyer that saves your ass in court, as we often save your ass with our magical IT skills and keep production up and moving even when systems collapse.

      --

      -The wise argue that there are few absolutes, the fool argues that there are no probabilities.

    38. Re:Salaries by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Bingo! This is why I quit doing corporate, I got so damned tired of being looked at as this money sucking leech and being expected to fix a bazillion wrong things with no damned money and little help. These bean counting pricks act like you can keep those POS PCs forever, that nothing ever breaks down, and that ANY money IT asks for is a waste. Now with work conditions like that, is it any damned wonder that nobody wants the fucking job?

      Now I work with consumers and small business and while the pay isn't as good you know what? They are ACTUALLY GRATEFUL for the job you do! And they will actually LISTEN to your suggestions without looking at every damned thing as a way for you to "waste money", not to mention they don't call you 24/7 and expect your ass to jump like a frog on a hot plate. Fuck corporate IT, it is one of the shittiest jobs I have ever worked! Between the bad attitudes, the fighting for every penny, the long hours, the PHB bullshit, frankly I'd sit on a street corner with my acoustic and a tin cup rather that do that God damned job again!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    39. Re:Salaries by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Now with work conditions like that, is it any damned wonder that nobody wants the fucking job?

      Ha! Right on target. I would add to that the number of interviews I went to that I was well qualified for the job and the company was holding out for someone younger, or who would work unlimited hours for $30K.

      Industry crapped on a whole generation of IT people and now it's coming around to bite them in the ass. Oh, we can't find qualified IT people. Ahhhh. Someone call the waaaaaaaaambulance.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    40. Re:Salaries by PRMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Now if you prove yourself a hard worker, (and the company is using proper HR policies), The company will see your value as greater and give you a raise, and try harder to retain you.

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHA. I've never seen this anywhere I've worked. There are so many things wrong with that statement it's hard to even know where to begin:

      1. The best IT people are NOT hard working. They are astoundingly LAZY. They write almost nothing and never look like they are doing anything. And yet their code is fast, clean, maintainable and they are always moving to the next project because the last one is in production and butter smooth. It's 100% impossible for an IT outsider to know who the good employees are.

      2. I've never been at a company that used any HR policy that even found good employees period. They SHOULD concentrate on what you accomplished and how much money it made or saved the company. Instead, they usually devolve into twisted popularity contests or seeing who is the most obsequious or who is the best meaningless rule-follower.

      3. I've never been at a company (that wasn't a consulting company) where they gave ANY value to IT workers period. Despite the fact that you are out-earning them 2:1 in some cases and that your IQ is 25-30 points higher than theirs, they treat you like you are some dumb plumber or auto mechanic that dropped out of high school and are overcharging them for fixing their car or something.

      4. Companies will spend a fortune to attract new talent and pay recruiters 10-15% for the privilege. But they have stupid rules in place that PREVENT them from EVER giving a 5% raise to an IT worker no matter how valuable they are. As such, they spend all their time re-training instead of retaining.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    41. Re:Salaries by erp_consultant · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "I've never been at a company (that wasn't a consulting company) where they gave ANY value to IT workers period" - That's why I went into consulting. Working in IT support puts you in a cost center in the eyes of senior management. In consulting I am a revenue generator. The difference is night and day in terms of how are you treated.

    42. Re:Salaries by PRMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are 2 types of engineers that can't communicate.

      1. Ones that can't communicate with non-technical people. I can find a place for them.

      2. Ones that can't communicate with technical people either because they are total jerks. There is NO place for them.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    43. Re:Salaries by DaveGod · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Don't resent people with MBAs; they perform an important role in understanding business -- especially finance and accounting.

      As an accountant I can confirm "MBAs" don't know shit about finance and accounting.

      MBAs were created because people highly skilled in one thing eventually get promoted into upper management, which requires a whole new bunch of skills and knowledge which they've never needed to learn before because it was never relevant before. It's a very broad, but very short course where the intention is to teach just about enough for them to get the gist when someone competent in a particular field (e.g. the senior accountant or head of marketing) is talking about things in the board meeting. This means they get taught at a very high (i.e. strategic) level and not fundamental basics.

      The problem is that the arrogant ones then think they've got the super-smarts and try to "get creative" with something when they have no grasp of the fundamental concept. Seriously, some of these guys think they have a much better idea about specialist areas after a couple of weeks on an MBA course than guys who have a decade of higher+ learning and decades of direct experience.

      What you want an MBA for is the newly-promoted director of engineering who's been an engineer all his life, knows everything about engineering and just needs a crash-course on the crap the other guys are talking about in the board meetings.

    44. Re:Salaries by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To me the sad part is instead of the free market working as intended, which would be to raise salaries and lower worker abuse instead they'll just drag some poor bastards in from India that they can work like dogs and treat like dogshit.

      I have NEVER in my life seen ANY branch of a corporation treated with such hatred and contempt as I've seen IT treated. they act like they are nothing but glorified Geek Squad workers and give them less respect than a checkout girl at the local Wally World. EVERY need for resources is treated as a waste, EVERY need for action treated as an undue expense, EVERY suggestion treated like its coming from the mouth of a retard, I wouldn't take that fucking job again for all the tea in China!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    45. Re:Salaries by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "The MBA classes do teach that the higher you pay a person the harder they will work (not the opposite)"

      Good story. It's only it fails to explain why -oh why, there's a "... Forty-nine percent of U.S. companies having a hard time filling what workforce management firm ManpowerGroup calls mission-critical positions within their organizations. IT staff" on a country that just a decade ago had a surplus on such roles.

      The MBA classes might teach whatever they (say) want. Quite a different issue is what their students learn... which basically ends up being "let's cry the government so we can get some more H1Bs on the cheap, get this quarter numbers fit and so get our bonuses and the hell with anything else".

    46. Re:Salaries by turbidostato · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I've seen so many companies not think about this fact, and only consider IT a cost center."

      Even with that only, IT would be quite well considered. After all, who would want to return to the productivity of a company-without-computers even for a second?

      But I'll tell you a secret. IT can do much more for the company if allowed. A glaring example: what does(did) Amazon? Amazon did sell books on-line. Now take your typical MBA: "a company must focus on its core competencies" I almost can hear. Well, Amazon's core competencies were certainly not maintaining hugh datacenters, so that task should have been subcontracted, shouldn't it, you out-of-the-mill Mr MBA?

      Well, Bezos had a different idea... and a uber-fast growing now multi-billion bussiness out of those datacenters... along with a buoyant business selling those (now not only) books on-line because of his top-notch datacenter management abilities.

      That's IT.

  2. Second half of the phrase.... by wickerprints · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "IT positions some of the toughest jobs to fill in the US...because employers can't get enough cheap H1B foreign labor." This is not about finding Americans with enough technical expertise, of which there are plenty--it's about employers who aren't willing to pay for it, and want to hire cheap labor from India/China visa holders.

  3. Two part problem by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1. Americans bailed on the sector when the first big bump in 1998-2000. This left a gap that new trainees never really came in to fill.
    2. H1Bs go home. This means the insane over-recruitment of H1B employees had a cost at the end of their terms.
    3. There has been, up until 2008, and attitude in the U.S. that any college degree is good enough. My state only graduated 40,000 people from community colleges/trade schools this year. Everyone with higher aspirations just went to a 4 year school. To do less is to view oneself as a failure(and employers do too).
    4. Combine that with a culture with a slight distaste for mathematics and science and that's more than enough basic features to explain a discrepancy of this level.

  4. Basic economics by beamin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They just need to up their offer. Go invisible hand!

  5. I think we all know how to solve this problem... by spagthorpe · · Score: 4, Informative

    If the salaries for those positions were acceptable to the people with those skills, they would have no problem filling the positions.

    I get weekly emails from companies wanting me to do contract work, all senior engineer level work, as a contractor (no benefits, 1099 work), and the hourly rate is pathetic. Then they cry about not being able to hire engineers, and how we need to outsource/bring in H1Bs. Let them struggle.

    --

    WWJD -- What Would Jimi Do?
    (Smash amp, burn guitar, take home the groupies)

  6. There is a major shortage of recuiters and HR by johnb10001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    people that can write a job description and match job seekers to the jobs.

  7. I could see it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    To do well in IT you just have to have a certain problem solving ability. I don't think it is something that can be taught, or at least I can't tell you how to teach it. It isn't about knowing a lot about computers, it is about being able to process novel problems and find solutions to them, expediently preferably.

    That's what we look for when we hire students (I do IT work for a university). Finding students with experience is hard since, well, they are students of course they don't have experience and that aside the kind of things we do, almost nobody has experience with. That's ok, what we are really after is someone who is good with problem solving, particularly the kind of problem solving you need for computers.

    I've encountered more than a few people who are not very qualified/competent in IT. We've hired a few people since I've worked here and I've sat on their hiring board (the IT manager, my boss, usually has 4 other technical people with him on the board for interviews). The only people in interviews already made it past HR's resume filtering, and then were the best resume's from the bunch we got. Still, many have been totally unqualified and it becomes readily apparent in the interview process.

  8. No, really? by Sarten-X · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As someone who recently sought to fill one of those openings, I have some advice for companies looking to hire: Let your existing IT people write the job listing. A disturbing number of the listings I came across were ridiculous.

    5 years experience required, for an entry-level position at $25,000 salary with weekends on-call? Nope. I might be unemployed, but I don't want to lose money on a job.

    Looking for someone A+-certified with mainframe maintenance and 15 years of Java programming experience? I'm close to qualified, but now I'm scared.

    Five programming tests and two phone interviews, and the face-to-face interviewer doesn't even get my name even close to right? I don't think the epitome of "faceless corporation" is the right fit...

    Look, I understand that there are lots of IT folks out of work, and you think that if you ask for the world, you'll get it from them. You might meet some success, but is stripping your employees of dignity really the right way to get a productive workforce?

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  9. Companies are bad at hiring by Kohath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Companies (and HR departments in particular) are bad at hiring someone to grow into a job. They want someone who is in the top 20% of their profession and can do the entire job starting right away, but then they base their pay scales on the 50th percentile.

    Headhunters also do a bad job, at a high price.

    If there were people who could actually be trusted to do a good job at filling positions, lots of people would benefit.

  10. I disagree with that. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've found that the ability to talk to non-technical people is more important to most hiring managers simply because it's a lot easier to train someone to be technical than it is to train them to work with people.

    I disagree with that.

    I think it is easier for the hiring managers to evaluate "interpersonal skills" than it is for them to evaluate "technical skills". And since it is easier for them, they value those skills more.

    http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/

    http://thedailywtf.com/

  11. 3 reasons by jbolden · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The original article listed the 3 reasons the slots were hard to fill, "including lack of available applicants, applicants looking for more pay and lack of experience"

    So in other words employers who don't recruit, don't pay much and aren't willing to train are having trouble. Well good.

  12. Fortune passes everywhere by undeadbill · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Management are finally discovering what experienced IT staffers have been warning them about for years- failure to invest in training and mentoring entry-level staff will result in shortages over all levels of skill in the future.

    Skilled staff are not a commodity. They are not widgets that can be easily replaced. Moreover, the attrition rate for the IT field is high- I am one of 4 people I know among my extended group of friends with more than 20 years in the business who are still working as non-management. Everyone else has either changed professions to something else, or is in management.

    The unemployment rate for IT staff in my region is less than 3%. I stopped trying to get requisitions for new staff to train up years ago when I realized that until their pants are on fire, management at most companies simply won't understand that it can take three to five years to train up a good IT staffer, provided the will and funding are there to do it. So, this new "news" is not a surprise to me, and I've taken a more laid back approach as I've realized that there isn't any purpose to changing some peoples' minds about the growing staff shortage. As of now, I'm enjoying the ride, letting people call me and determining where I'm going to have to argue least about pay.

  13. Ageism by vlm · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Don't forget the ageism thing. Shocked no one mentioned this.

    Must have 25 years Java experience... and the unwritten rule is be under 30.

    Sometimes ageism shows up in ridiculous combos, where the only way to get that combo is to already have that specific position, or be about 60.. and they only hire kids under 30.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  14. Ridiculous requirements and bad salaries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if drivers were hired like software developers?

    Job title: car driver

    Job requirements: professional skills in driving normal- and heavy-freight cars, buses and trucks, trolley buses, trams, subways, tractors, shovel diggers, contemporary light and heavy tanks currently in use by NATO countries.

    Skills in rally and extreme driving are obligatory!
    Formula-1 driving experience is a plus.

    Knowledge and experience in repairing of piston and rotor/Wankel engines, automatic and manual transmissions, ignition systems, board computer, ABS, ABD, GPS and car-audio systems by world-known manufacturers - obligatory!

    Experience with car-painting and tinsmith tasks is a plus.

    The applicants must have certificates by BMW, General Motors and Bosch, but not older than two years.

    Compensation: $15-$20/hour, depends on the interview result.

    Education requirements: Bachelor's Degree of Engineering.

  15. You pay slave wages, you get slave labour. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While you MIGHT get extremely lucky and find one of the few techs who (for whatever reason) needs a job at any salary while having all those skills ...

    You'll pretty much end up with two situations:

    1. That person will be gone as soon as they find a better paying job. And you will have to start over again.

    2. That person really does not have those skills and is willing to learn them "on the job" while making all the mistakes a novice would make. And then leaves to find a better paying job.

    Either way, you pay slave wages, you get slave labour.

  16. Requirements by Rtarara · · Score: 5, Funny
    Seeking qualified IT person. Requirements:

    10 years C++
    5-7 years Java
    5-7 years HTML and CSS
    2-3 years SQL
    2-3 years Ruby
    1 year JQuery
    1 year COBOL
    Familiarity with VHDL
    Must be a Team Player
    Must be willing to work 60 hours per week
    Must know ballroom dancing
    Must speak sloth

    Salary 40,000 per year

    I have no idea why they are having difficulties....

  17. Re:I think we all know how to solve this problem.. by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What's your standard reply? I like $400/hour, 4 hour minimum + expenses, but that might be too low for you.

    My dad worked for the government for years. One of his buddies was talking to a recruiter, when the recruiter asked, "What will it take for you to come work for us." The guy answered something like 3x his current salary. Later the guy came back with "How about 2.8x salary?". He took the job.

    Always have an absurdly high number available. If the fish bite, reel them in.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  18. That fact that you say you need someone. by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something makes you think I'm not?

    Yeah. The fact that you're here claiming that you cannot fill that position.

    Knock off the cutesy, attempted implication but avoiding directly saying it, bullshit. Either you have an opening for X at $Y or you do not.

    The individual skills you're looking for are not uncommon. You can probably find someone with 2 of the 3 easily. And fairly inexpensively.

    But getting all 3 of the 3?
    Those people probably already have jobs doing something similar to what you're pushing and you'd have to hire them away from those jobs.

    So either you aren't offering them enough or there is something about the job or company that is scaring away the people with the experience you are looking for.

    And even experienced people who don't trust the situation can be hired if you're willing to pay enough up front.

  19. Re:Or find someone to slave for low wages by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wrong.

    Factor in the adult education costs to meet the requirements. You will find that your applicants will be statistically saddled with out of control student loans they need to make payments on. As such, they actually *NEED* the 100k figure, just to buy food and gas to come and work for you.

    The one suffering the entitlement complex is the business's HR dept, demanding absurd requirements for a low paying position. "We don't want to pay to train those people!" Is not a suitable out for this problem. I don't want to pay taxes either, but that doesn't mean I can tell uncle sam to fuck off on tax season.

    Like any purchaser, (an employer purchases labor.), you need to shop, and determine a fair price based on all outstanding market forces, and realize that after a certain point, you get what you pay for.

    It is unsrealistic to expect people to live in poverty like conditions (yes, you pay them a "decent wage", but that is for somebody that isn't paying asstons of money to an educational institution on the installment plan. When you pay several grand a month for student loan payments, 50k a year is barely livable on the "ramen for dinner" budget. Eg, poverty.) *JUST* so they can work for you.

    I understand that as an employer, you have to make sure your applicants meet your basic needs. When buying a boat, you want one that doesn't leak. However, demanding a yacht for 300$ is rediculous. It costs more than that to build the yacht. Saying the shipyard is suffering from entitlement issues is totally in the wrong. If all you need is a boat to putter around a lake in, a little fishing boat is more appropriate to your needs and your budget. That is what you should hire. Don't demand a yacht unless you need a yacht, because you *will* end up paying yacht prices.

    Need somebody to cobble together a shellscript? Your typical highschool kid can do that. Don't demand 10+yrs linux experience with sysadmin experience, a CS degree, and 50 industry certs. That's like demanding a nascar certified pit mechanic to have your tire changed, when a walmart tech with a speedwrench is more than adequate. Hire the walmart kid. Leave the nascar pit mechanic to the nascar circuit where he's really needed.

    stop saying the nascar guy suffers "entitlement" bcause he refuses to work changing your tire for 10$/hr. You're the one suffering entitlement by demanding a high-rate nascar pit mechanic for piddly shit. Seriously.