Slashdot Mirror


Worst Design Ever? Plastic Clamshell Packaging

Hugh Pickens writes "Rebecca Rosen writes that if you've recently opened up — or, more specifically, tried to open up — a CFL light bulb, you can sympathize with the question posted on Quora last year, 'What is the worst piece of design ever done?' The site's users have given resounding support to one answer: plastic clamshell packaging. 'Design should help solve problems' — clamshells are supposed to make it harder to steal small products and easier for employees to arrange on display — but this packaging, says Anita Schillhorn, makes new ones, such as time wasted, frustration, and the little nicks and scrapes people incur as they just try to get their damn lightbulb out. The problem is so pervasive there is even a Wikipedia page devoted to 'wrap rage,' 'the common name for heightened levels of anger and frustration resulting from the inability to open hard-to-remove packaging.' Amazon and Wal-Mart are prodding more manufacturers to change their packaging to cut waste. 'We've gotten e-mails from customers who've purchased scissors in a clamshell, which would require another pair of scissors to open the package,' says Nadia Shouraboura, Amazon's vice president of global fulfillment. Other worthy answers to the Quora question include the interfaces on most microwaves, TV remotes, New York City's parking signs, and pull-handles on push-only doors, but none gained even close to the level of popular repudiation that clamshells received."

398 comments

  1. It's not the packaging, it's the seal by DrEnter · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've had plenty of terrible times trying to get things out of plastic clamshells. I've also had no trouble at all... when they don't press seal the entire circumference of the package. If they just use a couple press locks (maybe with a touch of adhesive or a staple), these packages aren't bad at all. Why they insist on hermetically sealing them, though, that is baffling to me.

    1. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why they insist on hermetically sealing them, though, that is baffling to me.

      I believe it is that way for as a theft deterrent. The harder it is to open the harder it is to open in the aisle in the store and not get caught.

      There are replacements for clamshells that do an even better job of this though and without the bodily injury that occurs from people trying to open stubborn clamshells.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    2. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      They will want to balance ease of opening with tamper resistance and tamper evidence. The press locks are very easy to open, but make shoplifting and 'spare parts' lifting trivial to do in the store, all the more so because it isn't obvious that the package has been opened. More likely, they will move toward the perforated back panels, so at least you'll be able to see if someone opened it before you bought it.

    3. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by mcgrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think everyone hates those offal things; I know I do. But the worst design? Hardly. Clamshell packaging never killed anybody.

      Ever drive a car from the late '80s-early '90s? Rather than a knob, the volume control was buttons! Unlike earlier and modern car radios, you couldn't change the volume without taking your eyes off the road!

      Worse, your ac/heat controls used to have knobs, too. You could change the temp without taking your eyes off the road. Now they have BUTTONS! God damn it, listen up, idiot designers, buttons don't belong on a car's dash! If you need buttons, put them on the steering wheel like the radio controls on my car. That has the added benefit of not letting the fatassed passenger turn the AC all the way up and freezing me out.

      Similarly, what idiot decided to put the winshield wiper on the turn signal? Probably one of the many idiots that never use their turn signals. Not as bad as clamshell packaging or buttons on a car's dash, but still frustrating and stupid.

    4. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by firex726 · · Score: 0

      Well chances are you wont be using your hands. Bring along a small pocket knife, voila!

    5. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by NewWorldDan · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's also a return deterrant. Once you've shredded the package, you're much less likely to try and return it if you don't like it. Still, you could solve that by using a tear away strip. The packaging is irrepairably damaged, but the product is then easy to get out.

      Another key advantage is that it's very effective at protecting goods in shipping. It makes a very good shock absorber and it's very hard to damage the product inside. Unless you work in manufacturing or product development, you probably don't realize how much damage and vibration boxes suffer in the back of a truck.

    6. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should count myself as lucky then, my car uses knobs for both the radio and the AC/heating system.

    7. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by coinreturn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why they insist on hermetically sealing them, though, that is baffling to me.

      I believe it is that way for as a theft deterrent. The harder it is to open the harder it is to open in the aisle in the store and not get caught.

      Regardless, if I ever meet the inventor, I will punch him/her in the face.

    8. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's nothing.

      Since everyone's caught up in the touchscreen crazy, it's moving towards being controlled via tocuhscreen -- where you can't even feel if there's a button being pressed!

    9. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by macwhizkid · · Score: 1

      Why they insist on hermetically sealing them, though, that is baffling to me.

      The only reason I've ever heard that actually makes sense is that it cuts down on in-store returns.

      People often feel that if they return a product to the store that they're obligated to include all the original packaging: little plastic baggies and paper flyers, as well as the foam padding and the box itself.

      In reality, most stores are far more lenient, but when you have quite literally destroyed the package in the process of testing it out, it makes you far less likely to take that $10 light bulb back to the store.

    10. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by No2Gates · · Score: 0

      I'd like to meet the guy who designed clamshell packages in a dark alley.

      To put something fragile like a CFL bulb in it is insane. I broke one trying to open the package. I took it back to the store and got a refund, but what if I cut myself on the glass of the CFL tube?

      It's a huge pain to have to get a sharp knife and carefully open those packages.

      --
      Every time you call tech support, a little kitten dies.
    11. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nah, just seal their head in a clamshell package.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    12. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by ldobehardcore · · Score: 0

      If it were only for theft deterrent purposes, wouldn't it make more sense to just embed the product in a Lexan cube with a weighted base? Then nobody would steal it... /Troll

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    13. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use a can opener. Never a problem with a clamshell package again.

    14. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Another key advantage is that it's very effective at protecting goods in shipping.

      Which, of course, explains why the last chisel I bought was hermetically sealed in an indestructible plastic clamshell package.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    15. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      Some of us higher functioning beings can glance quickly (1/4 of a second or less, and usually not even necessary) to fix a reference and do the rest by feel and proprioception.

      If you have to stare at it to do your adjustment, then you really need to learn the thing better. Stare at it some in the parking lot or something.

      I know where every control of my car is by feel, and I did so after having the car for a whole month.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    16. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're a few years late with this complaint. (As another poster noted here) many car manufacturers are switching to all-touchscreen controls, so you have to navigate menus on a touchscreen just to set the temperature, adjust fan speed, or adjust the radio volume. The worst offenders are Ford/Lincoln and BMW.

      Most of the new cars I've driven lately do use knobs for HVAC: they typically have a knob for temperature, another for vent selection, and one for fan speed. There's frequently a few buttons (in the middle of the knobs usually) for turning on/off the AC, selecting recirculate, etc., but that's it (and those are things that you really do need buttons for).

      As for the wipers on the turn signal stalk, I've only seen that in GM cars. That alone will make me avoid buying a GM; it's too bad, because otherwise they've really improved a lot over the last 10 years, but if they can't even get that right, then forget it.

      If your passenger is messing with your AC, stop the car, make him get out, and tell him to call a cab. Problems with passengers are entirely your fault; you're the driver. If you can't control your passengers you have no business driving.

    17. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's also a return deterrant. Once you've shredded the package, you're much less likely to try and return it if you don't like it.

      Interesting...

      I've seen this put forth here a few times on this early thread...and I'm baffled. Really?

      Would anyone here be deterred from returning something just because packaging was shredded? I've never heard of this before till this thread....I'd not have thought of it at all actually.

      Way back in the dark ages, when I was working retail jobs in HS and first years of college, I was amazed at what people would try to return...shoes that were obviously worn. I had one kid bring in an old old worn pair of shoes, said his brother handed them down to him, and they didn't fit and wanted to return them for a new pair that fit him. No joke...

      I used to also sell clothes in the young men's area....and had some lady bring in bags of clothes..that were obviously worn and in cases stained.

      What was nice...was back then...the management backed you up when you refused to accept a return in that shape. I argued with her...called mgr...he looked at it and said no and when the lady started throwing a fit, he called security and they had her removed from the store telling her not to come back. Don't get me wrong...customer service was good with us...I got award for it and sales, had many happy return customers.

      Sadly...you don't see that today...bad service, and mgrs would never back up a sales person like that...and they accept returns on EVERYTHING....which is horribly abused. Hell, i've talked to girls that thought nothing, of buying a complete outfit to wear out somewhere nice...and then, returning it the next day......really?

      With that mentality...I can't imagine a clamshell case would deter anyone from a return.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      Must cost the shops more to process returns though as they can't just check and re-sell the item, it has to go back to the manufacturer for re-packaging or be written off. It must also increase the number of "dead out the box" returns due to items getting damaged as people wrestle with the packaging, light bulbs being a good example of something delicate often sold in clamshells.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    19. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 2

      Even with a knife it is still very conspicuous to open in a store.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    20. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Bieeanda · · Score: 1

      Welp, looks like I've got the first murder lined up for Se7en^2.

    21. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why they insist on hermetically sealing them, though, that is baffling to me.

      I believe it is that way for as a theft deterrent. The harder it is to open the harder it is to open in the aisle in the store and not get caught.

      That's what you would think. But I used to work for a store apprehending shoplifters in my younger years. The only people who are frustrated by this type of packaging are honest consumers and possibly teenage thieves. But teenagers typically would break the product when trying to remove it and toss it back, pretty much rendering the intent of the packaging useless as you can't sell broken merchandise. It's truly unbelievable how fast a heroin addict can circumvent anti-theft packaging.

    22. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'll happily return something in a completely-destroyed package. If they're going to sell me something where I have to destroy the packaging just to open it, then they're just going get a big mess of torn-up packaging and loose bits when I decide I need to return it. These days, most stores will accept almost anything back, and the teenager at the counter certainly doesn't care one way or the other.

    23. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by RDW · · Score: 3, Funny

      For a handy guide to opening clamshell packaging using standard kitchen implements, see this informative video by Larry David:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HubZInAs0-A

    24. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by firex726 · · Score: 5, Informative

      bring a jacket or hoodie, lay it over the basket, carry something around then pretend to be looking through the pockets while you're cutting it open under the jacket.

    25. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Tridus · · Score: 2

      So you must love the new touchscreen Fords then!

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
    26. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 4, Informative

      Fry's puts taped up clamshells packages back up on their shelves.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    27. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by magarity · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not head; their *hands*. Each in its own clamshell.

    28. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by magarity · · Score: 1

      a CFL bulb in it is insane. I broke one trying to open the package.

      CFLs are a design problem themselves. Did you follow the proper cleanup procedure?

    29. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

      I'd like to meet the guy who designed clamshell packages in a dark alley.

      To put something fragile like a CFL bulb in it is insane. I broke one trying to open the package..

      Did you follow the EPA clean up procedure for broken CFL bulbs too?

    30. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 5, Funny

      bring a jacket or hoodie, lay it over the basket, carry something around then pretend to be looking through the pockets while you're cutting it open under the jacket.

      Helpful shoplifting tips like this are why I keep coming back to Slashdot.

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    31. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by hexagonc · · Score: 1

      If it was about theft then why did I see items stored within a glass case with clamshell packaging? You'd think the case would be enough of a theft deterrent.

    32. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      weavilworm you say!
      dd his HaHa glasses today
      return now to the assortium for a return the remember

    33. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      To be fair, they test them in-house before putting things back up on the shelf. But when you see an entire row of a product that have all been returned, it's a sign that you should try a different manufacturer.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    34. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 1

      The manufacturer probably only packages the product in a single method for all of their customers. They may not know it will be displayed inside a case, nor would they probably care.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    35. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by MarkGriz · · Score: 1

      I believe it is that way for as a theft deterrent. The harder it is to open the harder it is to open in the aisle in the store and not get caught.

      True, but I wasn't aware that theft of CFL bulbs was so rampant as to necessitate that type of packaging.
      I think people wouldn't mind it as much if it wasn't used unnecessarily for every friggin thing under the sun.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    36. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most stores just cello-tape the packaging together, or put it in the "anti-theft" box they use for videogames/dvd-box-sets's , Futureshop/Bestbuy does the latter. Most grocerystore-walmart's just cellotape and put it in the scratch&dent bin with no markdown.

      The markdown on opened items is usually just to "at cost" if the item is the last one, but plenty of customers are assholes and will return the product only to rebuy it cheaper from the discount bin. Hell when I worked at one of these damned retail places, customers wanted a discount because it was the last one on the shelf. Jackasses. The only reason a lot of things are the last one on the shelf is to prevent assholes from dropping more than one into a cooler and walking out the front door.

    37. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Does anyone buy them? Is there any discount?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    38. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      And that is why we shoot people wearing hoodies. :)

    39. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Well chances are you wont be using your hands. Bring along a small pocket knife, voila!

      I'm not in the shoplifting business; but when I'm on the receiving end of a clamshelled product in the mail, I find that a very small, very sharp, blade on a handle(think an x-acto knife or a scalpel) works better than a bigger knife.

      You get much better depth control, it is much easier to cut precise outlines(even through just the top layer, right next to the fused seam), and generally avoid resorting to brute force, ignorance, and cutting yourself on packaging.

      Plus, nothing says 'don't bother rme, I'm busy with my hobbies.' quite like flicking up your scalpel when somebody demands your attention in mid-unbox...

      The hypothetical shoplifter might have good luck with a similar small blade attached to a finger-brace or short, palm-able handle.

    40. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      Which is why I use the Walmart Rental store. Someone could make a very good amount of money if they had a decent rental system that I paid a small sum to borrow something (with deposit). Autozone and Advance Auto have it for their car tools.

      When I needed a stud finder for hanging a few photos I found the stud finder that had the easiest to open/close packaging. Bought it, used it twice, returned it. I would have paid $1 or $2 to do that but that's not what stud finders cost and living in a small apartment I don't have a need or want to store yet another tool.

      And why can't people package like Apple? Put crap behind a glass if it's easily stolen. Apple seems to actually put thought into how their packaging works and looks. Everything opens easily. It's all packaged nice and neat and uses a minimal amount of packaging materials.

    41. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Nationless · · Score: 1

      It also means you can't return it in the original packaging.

    42. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      I bought some lights like this once (never again!), I broke half the lights opening the stupid package...

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    43. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by gtall · · Score: 1

      Think utility knife where the blade sticks out on the end and it is retractable. Then you only need stick the edge out a 1/4", say, and cut without having to count your fingers afterwards.

    44. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by bandy · · Score: 2

      To be fair, they test them in-house before putting things back up on the shelf.

      What color is the sky on your planet?

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    45. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Yes, there is usually a very small discount.

      I don't buy them.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    46. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by LunaticTippy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The packaging protected goods from the chisel. Not that I'm a fan of overpackaging, but the protection goes both ways. Imagine the damage a loose chisel could do, especially if it wormed its way out of a pallet 30' up.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    47. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 5, Funny

      To be fair, he didn't say that they passed the test.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    48. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by phantomlord · · Score: 1

      My 98 Ranger has a multifunction switch that really isn't that hard to master. Up/Down is the turn signal, forward is high beam, backward flashes the high beam, twist the knob for wiper control (off or about 6 speed settings) and push the end in for washer fluid. It took all of about 30 seconds to master.

      I've driven other vehicle where it can be difficult to figure out how to turn on the headlights, there is no obvious way to turn on/off the wipers or the off/speed is on different stalks, the HVAC system can't actually be turned off, that have a non-obvious ignition lock that prevents you from removing the keys, letc.

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
    49. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by virgnarus · · Score: 1

      Clamshell packaging: the stocks of today.

    50. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by gtall · · Score: 1

      Wipers on the turn signal aren't bad. I rather thought it was quite efficient. I turn the arm to turn my wipers on/off, I flick it with a finger up or down to use the signals.

    51. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Your Ranger sounds like a total pain in the ass. It might be easy to master when you're sitting in a parking lot, but when you're driving and your attention is divided among several different tasks, it's a different matter. Then you end up accidentally turning the wipers on when you're trying to activate the turn signals, or vice versa. Having them on the same stalk is stupid; better vehicles have them on separate stalks, the left for turn signals and headlights, and the right for wipers. Too many items on the same control is an invitation for confusion.

    52. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by CastrTroy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What about rental cars? Sure it's fine if you're in a familiar car, but if you've never drive the car before, finding the volume controls while driving can be very dangerous.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    53. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >> I use the Walmart Rental store.

      This is ok because (check all that apply):

      It's a big company.
      WalMart is evil.
      It doesn't hurt individuals at all, just a company.
      It doesn't hurt any one individual very much.
      It doesn't hurt WalMart, it hurts their suppliers.
      Nobody offers stud-finder rentals.
      I'm helping the environment by recycling tools.
      There are more important moral issues in the world.
      Fuck everybody else, I look out for only me.

    54. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      It's a little crazy considering Walmart is wired up like a casino with video.

    55. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Jeng · · Score: 1

      Not head; their *hands*. Each in its own clamshell.

      And a dozen or so fire ants packed in the clamshell.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    56. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen people returning tents and other camping gears at the end of their vacation.

    57. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe it is that way for as a theft deterrent. The harder it is to open the harder it is to open in the aisle in the store and not get caught.

      All they need to do is put on display one sample in a clamshell package, plus plastic cards with the product's barcode. You can examine the sample product and if you want to buy one, you take one card to the cashier and someone in the back brings you the actual product in a box. No chance of theft, no chance of the store's entire inventory being damaged by careless shoppers. Sure it takes an extra few minutes to shop, but people are getting too impatient these days and need to learn that life is not so short as the ads want you to believe.

    58. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's in the fucking clamshell?

    59. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Which, of course, explains why the last chisel I bought was hermetically sealed in an indestructible plastic clamshell package.

      A wood chisel is supposed to be razor sharp. If it got dulled by being thrown around in transit, it won't work properly and will be dangerous to the user.

    60. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      bring a jacket or hoodie, lay it over the basket, carry something around then pretend to be looking through the pockets while you're cutting it open under the jacket.

      Or just steal the whole thing and open it at home....

      --
      No sig today...
    61. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Scissors work even better. Just cut three edges off and it will fall open.

      --
      No sig today...
    62. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 2

      I gave up buying a keyboard because he came within one of these sealed plastic clamshell. Making it impossible to test the keyboard before deciding whether I should buy or not.

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    63. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Talderas · · Score: 1

      It's dependent on where the clamshell package is being stored.

      Retail? It's a bitch to open because they seal all the edges.
      Online company that has warehouse? Chances are it's not sealed all the way around and opens quite easily.

      Solution. Stop buying shit from brick and mortar stores.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    64. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Similarly, what idiot decided to put the winshield wiper on the turn signal? Probably one of the many idiots that never use their turn signals. Not as bad as clamshell packaging or buttons on a car's dash, but still frustrating and stupid.

      Um, no. It's great. Twist for wiper, push for washer, up/down for turn signal, forward/back for high/low headlight beams. Easy.

    65. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Adriax · · Score: 2

      What? You mean special infected Hunters, right? You know, zombies, not real living humans right?
      Next you'll tell me those aren't Boomers I've been taking shots at around the local McDonalds.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it!
    66. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by X0563511 · · Score: 0

      The few times I've used a rental, I didn't need that long to adjust to the basics like that. Sure, changing from FM to CD or such would require me to search for it, but the volume, power, and things like that don't take me long to nail down at all.

      Anyway, renting a car is an unusual situation. Hell, you need to concentrate on more important things, like performance characteristics. Not exactly a good counterpoint.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    67. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Nah, he picked up the nearest phone and shouted "Cleanup in isle 14!"

      --
      No sig today...
    68. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Yunzil · · Score: 1

      Your Ranger sounds like a total pain in the ass. It might be easy to master when you're sitting in a parking lot, but when you're driving and your attention is divided among several different tasks, it's a different matter.

      Are you seriously telling us you lack the ability to know whether to twist a knob or move a lever up and down while you're driving? Because if so, never drive again.

      Then you end up accidentally turning the wipers on when you're trying to activate the turn signals, or vice versa

      I think all my cars have had shared turn signal/wiper levers, and I have never once accidentally turned the wipers on while trying to signal. One is a twist motion, the other is up and down. I seriously don't understand how you could possibly mess that up. Sorry about your lack of motor control.

      better vehicles have them on separate stalks

      That's a funny way to spell "worse".

      Too many items on the same control is an invitation for confusion.

      As opposed to too many controls?

    69. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      I think everyone hates those offal things; I know I do. But the worst design? Hardly. Clamshell packaging never killed anybody.

      Probably not, but it's caused plenty of unnecessary cuts.

      Worse, your ac/heat controls used to have knobs, too. You could change the temp without taking your eyes off the road. Now they have BUTTONS! God damn it, listen up, idiot designers, buttons don't belong on a car's dash!

      Many cars today with automatic climate control use a rotary encoder for the temperature control (just as they do for the volume control on the stereo). This gives digital precision while still continuing to use a knob instead of buttons. Cheaper cars with manual A/C usually still have traditional speed controls for the fan and analog knobs (probably potentiometer driven) for the temp.

    70. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      Maybe they could solve the return 'problem' by having a return policy they actually are willing to stand behind sans tricks?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    71. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      You need to correct for your biased sample. For every destroyed return there likely was at least one customer who couldn't face you with a shredded package.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    72. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by mlong · · Score: 1

      I've seen Home Depot and K-Mart do this...possibly Lowes too. I just pick up a new one...I don't want one that has obviously been opened and taped back

      --
      //m
    73. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Matheus · · Score: 2

      I've had all the usual troubles getting into these things (and I buy a LOT of toys so it's a regular activity) but frankly what's going through my head primarily (aside from the survival instinct trying not to cut off my fingers) is the complete waste.

      When we were younger growing up in an Earth Day world one of the biggest environmental issues we talked about was over-packaging. For all the talk it seems to me that not only has this not gotten any better but it has actually gotten worse! I've been replacing a lot of stolen audio gear lately and a good example of my experience:
      Shipping package: Generally WAY oversized for what's inside. Lots of filler (whether it be peanuts (rare), bubble wrap or more common recently the "big" bubble wrap (essentially big bags of air). Then I get to the product package itself (mostly boxes for my stuff but sometimes clam shell). This is wrapped in shrink wrap. Then I crack open the outer to find a lattice of cardboard or plastic keeping the pieces of my product in their own little pens. Depending on the product there will also be layers of protective padding. From there certain parts are bagged (sometimes static bags). After (or without) the extra bagging most parts are shrink wrapped again with some parts in their own little boxes. Then a multitude of snaps, twist ties, etc for anything cable like and finishing off with the thin protecting film that covers anything remotely scratch-able and the requisite designed-to-be-removed brand stickers.

      That's a whole lot of crap that survives a number of minutes post-arrival before being instantly trash. Some of it has use for protection / pack-ability but SO much of it could be eliminated. My only gratification is a Christmas-style perk: The more effort to unwrap the more value goes to the gift. I may be buying these "gifts" for myself but it's still fun to do the opening. I just wish I wasn't killing the planet in the process.

    74. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Dude, you're a few years late with this complaint. (As another poster noted here) many car manufacturers are switching to all-touchscreen controls, so you have to navigate menus on a touchscreen just to set the temperature, adjust fan speed, or adjust the radio volume. The worst offenders are Ford/Lincoln and BMW.

      On the other hand, there are volume controls conveniently located on the steering wheel now. A rarity in the '80s and '90s but a feature that is present in all but the cheapest models. It is one of a million things that makes it a royal pain in the ass to upgrade to an aftermarket stereo system, but is still a major improvement. Throw in a HUD and even something as complex as BMW's i-drive system even better than knobs, because most controls can be duplicated on the steering wheel. This keeps your hands on the wheel and eyes on the road.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    75. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Don't be alarmed; these steps are only precautions that reflect best practices for cleaning up a broken CFL. Keep in mind that CFLs contain a very small amount of mercury -- less than 1/100th of the amount in a mercury thermometer."

    76. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Yes, Larry David is very funny but I find it very easy to open a plastic package with a mini-box knife. X-Acto knives cost too much.

      Although there are some people who do have trouble using a scissors. The world is full of klutzes. How come we don't have tv comedies making fun of them?

    77. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      It's easy to push a stalk up or down when you're trying to twist it. There's a reason every Japanese car made in the last 30 years has separate turn-signal and wiper stalks. It's only the cheap-ass American cars that combine them, to save a few pennies.

      And fuck you.

    78. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by T-Bone-T · · Score: 1

      Sometimes the packaging seems to be designed to prevent scissors from opening it. I haven't figured out a good way to open a package of Gillette razors using scissors.

    79. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      I stole a candybar from Walmart by putting it in the babyseat spot, and then forgetting it was there. Ooops.

      The checkout girl didn't notice of course, and neither did I until I was at my car and unpacking stuff. I left the bar where it was & shoved the cart through the door, and then quickly drove off.

      Here's the video of a bathroom destroyed by a CFL as it reached its end-of-life and burned.
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bubJX-m_HSs
      2nd vid I just found (no idea what it shows since I can't view it from work) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kALiIcrDGec

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    80. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I'll admit that while renting a Civic I kept turning the brights on while trying to activate the turn signal, since they were on the same lever. The sensitivity for the brights (pull towards me) was very low, while the turn signal (up/down) took more force, and the darn lever kept folding in on me. Now this was only for a few days, probably I would have gotten the hang of it eventually, but I think I flashed the brights at least a dozen times. Sometimes mixed controls can be a pain.

    81. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      The tape deck in my car has a 5 way button (I do not know the proper term, but it is like a small joystic - you can move it up/down (controls volume), left/right (searches for radio stations or ff/rw the tape) and press it (mute/pause)). While all buttons on the tape deck can be found just by touch, that one is the easiest and it should be.

      My car does not have a lot of features (no AC too, just a fan/heater), but there are a few switches (not buttons) to turn on the rear window heating and emergency signal. Heat and fan speed are knobs, as is the headlight/fog lamp knob (turn it CW to turn on the headlights, pull it out to turn on fog lamps).

      Similarly, what idiot decided to put the winshield wiper on the turn signal?

      I do not have a problem with the way it is designed in my car - move the handle up/down to indicate a turn, pull it to me to blink the headlights, push it away to turn on the high beam, twist the end to turn on the wipers and push the end in to wash the windscreen. All functions can be performed by interacting with the same handle and the functions are quite hard to mix up.

    82. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      If you've got steel studs or steel nails you can just use a small neodymium magnet from your fridge. Run it along the wall until you feel the pull, if the walls are sufficiently thin then it will even stick directly to the studs. Heck, you can even just knock on the wall to feel and listen for where the studs are. It's harder than with a nice stud finder obviously but for the occasional hanging it's fine. If you really want a stud finder you could also ask around your friends to borrow one, ask your neighbors, your apartment manager, or make a post on Craigslist or Freecycle.

      Sure a rental service for such things would be nice (assuming it's even profitable at a price people are willing to pay), but it's lazy on your part to not explore your many and varied legitimate options.

    83. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it, you can't open a Gillette razor with a Gillette razor.

      Use an X-Acto knife.

    84. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or have a barcode on the one package, and have scanners for shoppers. When you enter, you get a scanner. You scan the items you want, and when you get to the checkout line, all your products are already scanned, you pay, and then someone comes out with a cart with all your purchases already bagged up for you.

    85. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then, I have returned items precisely because I cannot open the package and *have* the item I purchased. Maybe we should all do that more often.

    86. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Which is why I always have a swiss army knife in my pocket, it saves me all the trouble.

    87. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer double bass-tape, for that extra depth, and fuller hold.

    88. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by AioKits · · Score: 1

      And 45 minutes is them trying to open the clamshell...

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    89. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      There is only one that applies: Walmart has a return policy that allows this. They could change it, but it drives business, so they don't.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    90. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      I think a single clamshell on the dominant hand would be more appropriate. Bonus points if you put some scissors or a knife into that hand.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    91. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Rick17JJ · · Score: 1

      The knobs and levers of our old 1971 Volvo were very well laid out ergonomically. I could easily find and operate any of the controls, by feel, without taking my eyes of the road. The knobs were all large enough for someone wearing winter gloves to easily operate. The knobs and levers typically provide non-visual feedback with clicks or the sound of a fan, or the feel of moving parts.

      By comparison, my 1992 GMC Sierra pickup truck has a collection of buttons all grouped together in one small area of the dash. To adjust the heating or cooling temperature, I need to find and then hold down the appropriate button for several seconds, while watching the temperature setting slowly scroll across the small display. While holding that button, I need to look back and forth several times, between the small display and the road. Unlike the old Volvo, there is no feedback in the form of sound or how the controls feel.

      When I occasionally find myself having to drive a much newer car or truck, their controls are so complex and confusing, that even the controls on my old 1992 pickup truck seem simple and easy to use by comparison.

    92. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      What if you cut yourself on the package itself?

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    93. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by wiedzmin · · Score: 1

      Not with an Olfa cutter... that's what I use to open these at home and all it takes is 1-2 seconds to slice the two sides and peel the package open. The only tricky parts is around corners, but once you've gotten a hang of turning the knife instead of pushing it along those - it's a breeze. Having said that: #firstworldproblems

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    94. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. I commonly see items in Walmart that were packaging taped back together.

    95. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      The windshield wiper sounds like a cost cutting measure from General Motors. My Mazdas (and many Fords, naturally) have all had the wiper controls on the right stick and lighting on the left.

    96. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like GM's wiper control layout in the Cobalt, at least. Right stick is wiper controls, left is lights.

      I do know the trucks with the column shifter are all on the left, however. But even then, it isn't too hard to get used to. You just have to memorize the layout by feel. If US military pilots can memorize the literal clusterfuck that is the average jet cockpit, you can probably memorize the cockpit layout of the average Honda Civic.

    97. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by rastos1 · · Score: 1

      Rather than a knob, the volume control was buttons! Unlike earlier and modern car radios, you couldn't change the volume without taking your eyes off the road!

      I have a Phillips radio from '99 that has buttons for volume. One of the buttons is concave, the other is opposite - like a round bolt head. Easy to distinguish by fingers. No need to take your eyes off the road.

    98. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Have you ever returned something? They check it there in front of you, and give you a bunch of attitude. It's the Fry's way.

      (As as the above commenter noted, I never said they did a good job.)

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    99. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by RDW · · Score: 1

      Yes, Larry David is very funny but I find it very easy to open a plastic package with a mini-box knife. X-Acto knives cost too much.

      Jeff: Just get an X-Acto knife...

      Susie: There you go.

      Jeff: ...or a box-cutter, ok?

      Larry: What? A box-cutter? Who am I, Mohamed Atta? I've got to, I've got to buy a box cutter? I mean it's crazy.

    100. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Then just put the damned things behind glass so an employee has to fetch it or have them numbered so you can just walk up to the counter and say you need a number 4 or something.

      Those things used to drive me up the wall until I was wandering around the local dollar store one day and saw in their knife section this cool looking serrated curved blade that looks kinda like a curved finger. When i asked the guy if there was a purpose for that he said "man i just LOVE that one, check it out" and whipped out an already opened clamshell and showed me how quickly that sucker slices through those damned things. Right then and there about bought four, two for me and a couple for the family. If you buy a lot of electronics you really need one of those blades, it just blows through those clamshells like a knife through hot butter.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    101. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Honda Civics all have wipers on the right stalk, lights/wipers on the left just like your Cobalt (in fact, I'm a little shocked your GM car came that way, I just drove a new Impala rental and it had everything on one stalk so I assumed that was a GM thing). Every Japanese car I've driven is exactly the same way. It makes it very easy to change cars, such as if you do any traveling and have to use rental cars.

      Generally, the whole "everything on one stalk" idea probably came about because of cars with bench seats and column-mounted shifters, but those vehicles are pretty rare these days except maybe for some trucks.

    102. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A few years ago a former flatmate of mine found another way. She left a large candle full of something scented burning all night in her sealed room and woke up to be seriously freaked out by great big rectangular areas of soot on the wall. The areas of soot and clean wall showed where there were studs in the walls. She was going to go with ghosts and was very disappointed when I started talking about condensation happening first on the coldest surfaces.

    103. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by swalve · · Score: 1

      KitchenAid kitchen sheers are the best scissors for this kind of work.

    104. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Seriously?

      How the hell do you drive at all?

      "I meant to turn, but I got all confused and honked the horn. They really need to separate the horn from the steering wheel!"

    105. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by swalve · · Score: 1

      The wiper controls used to be by the headlight switch, if memory serves, and then sometime in the 80s they invented the multi-stalk. I think it was all about cost cutting, as the same stalk was in the cars for about 20 years.

      Don't forget about the cruise controls being on it too. Push in a little button to turn it on and off, and another button/switch thing for setting the speed. And then another little switch thing for setting the intermittent wiper rate.

      I hate those stalks.

    106. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by bandy · · Score: 1

      Of course, I have, MrEricSir, on multiple occasions. I started shopping at Fry's when they still sold proper components as well as groceries, before the move across Lawrence Expy and the subsequent explosion of stores. The "checking" has always involved taking an inventory of what's in the box and comparing it to the given inventory on the side of the box, then slapping a sticker on it. There are, of course, two stickers, one that's RTV and the other that's meant to be put on items that are to be re-shelved. I've seen a non-zero number of re-packaged items (now they have their own shrink-wrap machine!) with RTV stickers put back on the shelves.

      --
      "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
    107. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by phantomlord · · Score: 1

      In 14 years of driving it, I can't say I remember a time where I ever got the wrong function while using the single stalk in my truck. There are times when I've gone to turn off the high beam and pulled too far, triggering the beam flash, but I've never turned my wipers on only to trigger the turn signal. There are times, usually when it is really cold, that the multifunction switch doesn't want to work at all, but never does it trigger wrong for me.

      But maybe I'm lucky and I got the only multifunction switch that isn't hard to mistrigger or maybe you're unlucky or there's something wrong with your technique. Every function except the wipers is a one finger thing for me, the wipers are three - my thumb, index and middle fingers as I roll it.

      --
      Don't leave your mind so open that your brain falls out. Don't close it so much that you cut off the blood.
    108. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      No, asshole, the return policy doesn't "allow" this at all. The no hassle return policy is designed to make customers' lives easier, not to encourage them to have no ethics...though some people need no encouragement at all, it seems.

    109. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Fry's puts taped up clamshells packages back up on their shelves.

      And all this is doing using a robot, built by other robots, and powered by a zero point energy device I assume? In other words, at zero cost to the company.

    110. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      I think a sword would be more appropriate. Two big ass swords, one in each hand, both wrapped in the most obnoxious and impenetrable clamshells ever designed. Then we'll put him in the ring and let him fight a lion.

    111. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      All they need to do is put on display one sample in a clamshell package, plus plastic cards with the product's barcode. You can examine the sample product and if you want to buy one, you take one card to the cashier and someone in the back brings you the actual product in a box. No chance of theft, no chance of the store's entire inventory being damaged by careless shoppers.

      No chance of increased revenue, since sales would plummet 30%.

      Might want to rethink this idea, junior.

    112. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      No, gentlemen, the return policy allows it and the store's have made few, if any efforts to curb returns of heavily used items. Whether or not that is to be considered encouragement I didn't weight in on, so please refrain from implying that I have.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    113. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This is driving me crazy! Someone get an x-acto knife. So who is this guy anyway?"

      "He invented clamshell packaging."

      "Looks like *puts on shades* a clear case of karma."

    114. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      I am curious what do buttons and knobs have to do with taking your eyes off the road? Are you implying you can find the knob without looking because you can just wave your want around till it hits the knob? And what do you do if there are several? Can't you do the same with the buttons?

    115. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Why they insist on hermetically sealing them, though, that is baffling to me.

      I believe it is that way for as a theft deterrent. The harder it is to open the harder it is to open in the aisle in the store and not get caught.

      There are replacements for clamshells that do an even better job of this though and without the bodily injury that occurs from people trying to open stubborn clamshells.

      Actually, it's easier to steal. You use a razor blade to cut open the package, and take out what's in it. What is really nice is places think that because it's a bitch to open, and has the tags on the inside that set off the detectors, so they don't pay attention to people as much. But a few quick swipes with a razor blade, while you pretend to be reading whats on it, and boom, you got the item in your hand.

      Do not ask me how I know this exactly, it wasn't me, no matter what the video camera shows.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    116. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      There's a reason every Japanese car made in the last 30 years has separate turn-signal and wiper stalks.

      Yes, and it's the same reason GM, Ford, etc has theirs on the same stalk: because that's the decision they made years ago, it works fine, there's nothing wrong with it, and 95% of people have no trouble with it.

      On my 02 Mustang, I love having all the controls are integrated into one stalk. Everything can be operated without taking my hands off the steering wheel. This isn't the case with my 86 Mustang, which has separate controls for everything. Either arrangement works fine for me though.

      I do agree, from a business perspective, that having separate controls would be beneficial for those with poor motor control skills or other issues which keep them from properly operating the integrated setup. If it were me and I built cars, I would have mostly separate controls for things, and no touchscreen controls whatsoever.

    117. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Personal injury lawyers took knobs out of cars. Kid's head collides with knob, knob imbeds itself in kid's skull. My truck's radio has a small knob to change the stations with but it retracts into the dash if you depress it.

    118. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by shiftless · · Score: 1

      the store's have made few, if any efforts to curb returns of heavily used items

      This is because the store wants their customers to return things if they're dissatisfied with them. A customer is not wrong for returning an item he is dissatisfied with.

      Buying it simply to borrow it and return it however is extremely fucking unethical. The store takes a loss each and every time, and therefore the borrower is living off another man's back.

      Cut the excuses in 3...2... just save it. If your mama never taught you right from wrong then I ain't about to.

    119. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by arose · · Score: 1

      Again, the store should have a return policy to reflect it, if it was true. The stores that don't, however, clearly see enough benefit to keep the things as is.

      Stop the fucking insinuations, dear sir. The ethics are simple: you don't break the law, the store doesn't break the law. The rest is up to the person, that is what you personally are comfortable with and what I personally am comfortable (and for the record, oh dear and most respected holier than though, high horse riding, insult slinging knight in polished silver armor, I personally avoid returns as much as possible, but that has nothing to do with the topic at hand besides keeping you focused on it) with doesn't figure into what should be.

      It's pretty simple, the store wants to advertise a huge safety net that most people won't use, the store makes more profit by keeping their promise as it stands rather than adding a million disclaimers, therefore the store willingly puts up with all of the return ("ab")use. Trying to discourage returns on the basis of crappy packaging instead of changing the policy is what would be unethical. That's it. They don't have to do it this way and there is absolutely no need to rush to their defense.

      --
      Analogies don't equal equalities, they are merely somewhat analogous.
    120. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by toddestan · · Score: 1

      The tape deck in my car has a 5 way button (I do not know the proper term, but it is like a small joystic - you can move it up/down (controls volume), left/right (searches for radio stations or ff/rw the tape) and press it (mute/pause)). While all buttons on the tape deck can be found just by touch, that one is the easiest and it should be.

      I've driven a car with a control like that and I hated it. It's fine when the car is not moving or perhaps on a very smooth road, but otherwise it was very hard to manipulate the control while moving because the movement of the car kept on making me activate the wrong feature. And forget about using it on a bumpy road.

    121. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      O'Reilly's does one better. They allow you to borrow tools for free.

    122. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      Well, my car has good suspension and the roads are usually not that bumpy (unpaved roads usually have "high frequency" bumps that do not affect my ability to control the tape deck, just make some noise). I don't think I ever activated the wrong feature - I just use one finger to push the control in the direction I want so the movement of the car won't cause me to move it sideways if I wanted to move it up.

    123. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by surd1618 · · Score: 1

      Cut out a rectangle with the security strip in it first.

    124. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      It's the same policy as Advance Auto and Auto Zone. You "buy" the full price of the tool and return it in 14 days or they just charge you full price.

    125. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Ever drive a car from the late '80s-early '90s? Rather than a knob, the volume control was buttons! Unlike earlier and modern car radios, you couldn't change the volume without taking your eyes off the road!

      Worse, your ac/heat controls used to have knobs, too.

      My cars from back then had volume knobs. My 2006 Grand Voyager has both volume control knobs, *and* temperature control knobs.

    126. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I've seen them as healdlight switches, too, and that's even dumber than wipers. Hit your turn signal wrong and the lights go out, wht moron decided that was safe?

      Fortunately I haven't had a car with the cruise on the stem. Mine has the controls on the steering wheel, accessabe without taking your eyes off the road or your hands off the wheel.

    127. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You can find the knob by feel, and tell the different knobs apart if they're different sizes or have different fluting.

    128. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will the two of you please stop posting for a minute and actually read each other's posts?

      He's saying that the return policy allows it. You're saying it's unethical. You're both right.

      It is unethical, but the return policy allows it, because (a) it'd be extremely hard to draw a line beyond which you'd enforce it and (b) Wal-Mart still makes money off of unethical customers, as long as they don't get out the door with merchandise they haven't paid for. Sending them away angry would be bad for repeat business, and bad publicity.

    129. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bring a jacket or hoodie, lay it over the basket, carry something around then pretend to be looking through the pockets while you're cutting it open under the jacket.

      Helpful shoplifting tips like this are why I keep coming back to Slashdot.

      Can use a shopping list on typing paper folded in half and keep in cart, and put pack of razor blades inside. use self checkout. Or folded up in add in bottom of cart
       

    130. Re:It's not the packaging, it's the seal by davewoods · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you on this, but whenever I signal for a right turn, sometimes my pinky slips barely off the back of the stalk, turning the lights on, or at least flashing the brights. Though it could just be a fault in my motor skills, because this has been an issue in multiple vehicles.

      Either way, it has not ever been a big enough issue for me to complain about it, I realize that I may be at fault, so I do not even mention it when I do it, nor do I try to find blame in someone.. GP is a little crazy methinks.

  2. Someone sells a tool to open these things easily.. by craznar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. and you guessed it.

    Comes in a nice cardbox box : http://the-gadgeteer.com/2009/08/10/zipit-clamshell-package-opener-review/

    --
    EMail: 0110001101100010010000000110001101110010 0110000101111010011011100110000101110010 0010111001100011011011110110
  3. I blame Apple by kthreadd · · Score: 2, Funny

    For every iPhone sold there is at least one package. Absolutely THEIR fault.

    1. Re:I blame Apple by ddd0004 · · Score: 2

      It can't be Apple's fault. The plastic clamshell is only difficult to open. If Apple designed it is wouldn't be able to be opened by the end-user. Apple would require you to visit a nearby Apple store, pay a service charge and have a "genius" retrieve the contents.

    2. Re:I blame Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For every iPhone sold there is at least one package. Absolutely THEIR fault.

      I know you're trolling, but one of the many things that Apple does right is packaging.

      No matter what you're buying from Apple, you never get a clamshell package, or anything else that requires scissors to be opened. Even if it's just a cable, it'll come in a nice little bag that opens at one end. Everything else comes in a box.

  4. Memo to manufacturers by crazyjj · · Score: 0

    If I need a pair of scissors to open your package...you have failed.

    --
    What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    1. Re:Memo to manufacturers by idontgno · · Score: 1

      If you're a shoplifter, and you need a pair of scissors (or more likely, a bolt cutter) to open the package, they have succeeded.

      After all, once the damn thing is paid for, the manufacturer certainly doesn't care how hard it is to open. They've got theirs. Whereas losses from pilferage take (prospective) money out of their pocket, so THAT is not gonna happen if they have any say in the matter.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    2. Re:Memo to manufacturers by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Whereas losses from pilferage take (prospective) money out of their pocket

      As do losses from people not buying your product because they don't want the hassle of dealing with shitty packaging.

    3. Re:Memo to manufacturers by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Except when someone returns the item, the packaging is destroyed and then it's very hard to resell it at full price. It's not the retailer taking the hit on this, it's the manufacturer; places like Walmart do not buy products from mfgrs and resell them, they're actually basically consignment shops for the mfgrs. If the retailer can't sell something, it returns the product to the mfgr, who must reimburse them for the cost of the item.

    4. Re:Memo to manufacturers by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Whereas losses from pilferage take (prospective) money out of their pocket, so THAT is not gonna happen if they have any say in the matter.

      Nope.

      The manufacturer got paid when the shipped it out to the retailer. It's the retailer that eats the cost. Especially since it just goes missing.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Memo to manufacturers by mhajicek · · Score: 2

      Hidden cost, hard to quantify, doesn't show up on spreadsheets often.

    6. Re:Memo to manufacturers by DroolTwist · · Score: 1

      I'm not a big fan of these packages, either. But I have never not bought something because of the package. I mean, its sealed in plastic. I may curse when opening it, but that experience is forgotten shortly after getting the item out.

    7. Re:Memo to manufacturers by RearNakedChoke · · Score: 1

      If you're a shoplifter, and you need a pair of scissors (or more likely, a bolt cutter) to open the package, they have succeeded.

      After all, once the damn thing is paid for, the manufacturer certainly doesn't care how hard it is to open. They've got theirs. Whereas losses from pilferage take (prospective) money out of their pocket, so THAT is not gonna happen if they have any say in the matter.

      I'm surprised nobody has filed a class action suit against them for the packaging. I'm sure more than enough people have gotten hurt or damaged the item itself.

    8. Re:Memo to manufacturers by Skater · · Score: 1

      Amazon sells stuff in "frustration free packages" - I'm much more likely to buy something when I see that note. It's really weird getting an SD card and holder in a small cardboard envelope, with absolutely nothing else but a sheet of paper (packing list). Weird, but great.

    9. Re:Memo to manufacturers by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      Hidden cost, hard to quantify, doesn't show up on spreadsheets often.

      OT I know, but am I the only one that hears Mordin Solus' voice when I read that?

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    10. Re:Memo to manufacturers by AioKits · · Score: 1

      Hidden cost, hard to quantify, doesn't show up on spreadsheets often.

      Did anyone else read this in Mordin's voice?

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    11. Re:Memo to manufacturers by swalve · · Score: 1

      It depends on the product and the distribution setup they have. Some of the larger retailers have gotten their suppliers to sign off on deals like that.

    12. Re:Memo to manufacturers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least they haven't copied the the MPAA's model, where shoplifters don't have to deal with the packaging but buyers do.

    13. Re:Memo to manufacturers by hackula · · Score: 1

      Does the manufacturer even care if their item gets shoplifted? The store carrying it is the one taking the loss in most cases (no pun intended).

  5. There are good things by jonnythan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The nice thing about clamshell packaging is that it clearly displays the product itself, and usually so you can see most or all the sides of the product. This is in many ways better than a cardboard box with a couple of printed pictures on the outside.

    I'm sure I'm not the only one who has pried open a cardboard box in a store to get to the product inside to see what it actually looked like. Clamshell designs largely prevent that.

    The fix is to make them possible to open by hand. Many clamshell packages have a perforated panel on the back you can simply pull open. That's a pretty good design.

    1. Re:There are good things by InvisibleClergy · · Score: 1

      This is almost exactly what the Wikipedia article linked in TFA said. Just, y'know, FYI.

    2. Re:There are good things by jonnythan · · Score: 2

      I apologize for not reading all 4 links in full before posting a thought.

    3. Re:There are good things by Sunshinerat · · Score: 1

      I agree only on your point that the product is almost completely visible. No need to unpack.
      What I do not agree on is the easy to open idea of perforation in the back. That never works.
      Either the perforation is to rigid and wont tear without excessive force, I usually get a scissor to open.

      A well made clam shell packaging can be opened and closed with press locks and a piece of tape.
      If you need to return an item, you can do so in decent shape, if the product came in a completely sealed clam shell (with or without perforation) and I need to return it, expect it to be returned in a plastic bag as the packaging will never go back to its original shape.

      Lastly, CFL bulbs need to be in clam shell packaging as it protects the product fairly well, however, when you buy a pack (always more than one in a package) to replace one lamp, you end up with one or more unprotected bulbs as the package never comes back to its original shape. The last thing you want to do is break an spare CFL in storage.

      --
      Load New Commander (Y/N)?
    4. Re:There are good things by smagruder · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the other hand, they're usually made from a kind of plastic that recyclers don't take. If we have to continue to put up with clamshells, at least they should use a #1-#6 plastic.

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
    5. Re:There are good things by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      If all you want to do is display the product, there are better ways, as you point out. For instance, I'm reminded of the packaging used for action figures. They have a thin cardboard backing with clear plastic adhered to the front, and the plastic had a section where the product could be displayed. It was simple to open by either peeling the plastic away from the cardboard or by tearing through the cardboard. Even as a child, I could do it without the need for any tools or long fingernails.

      Granted, the example I've provided is pretty generic, since they were likely trying to save on manufacturing costs while producing hundreds of various models of action figures, but for a company with a handful of products, you could easily have the plastic conform to the shape of the product.

    6. Re:There are good things by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yes. At least that.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:There are good things by marcosdumay · · Score: 2

      If you need to return an item, you can do so in decent shape, if the product came in a completely sealed clam shell (with or without perforation) and I need to return it, expect it to be returned in a plastic bag as the packaging will never go back to its original shape.

      That's a feature, not a bug. When you get a product in a sealed clamshell in a store you know it wasn't tampered with, and it isn't a return.

    8. Re:There are good things by fermion · · Score: 2
      Which is why it is clear that the writer understands nothing of design. Design is there to solve a set of problems in an elegant manner. Now it is true that a good design will minimize secondary problems, but the reality is that secondary problems are secondary, and cannot overly impact the primary design. For instance, it would be wonderful if a laptop computer had a big keyboard or a big battery, but since the primary function of a laptop is to be small, these factors are significantly sacrificed.

      As mentioned, the problem the clamshell solves is to be light to minimize shipping costs, protect the product from damage, from theft, allow the product to be easily seen, and easily displayed. I think that the clamshell does this at least as good as anything else. The only complaint that it is hard to open.

      But what part of the lifecycle is the opening. A small fraction. Most of the life cycle is shipping, display, and the secure sale. Opening, in the grand scheme of the design, is not significant. It could be argued that since the end user is the ultimate person who needs to be satisfied, the opening might be more of an issue. But the end user is the customer of the retail sale outlet, not the manufacturer. And if a product does not sell of get stolen the retail outlet will not be happy.

      Which is why Amazon is trying to change the packaging. Because it has no display or security issues. So there is no reason to make the sacrifices that the retail chain makes. And for Amazon there is a simple solution, which is to have a perforated back. The problem such a back kills the security of the package in a traditional retail environment. So something else needs to be done. I am not sure what WalMart is doing. For them, they may looking to minimize shipping and display costs.It is probably cheaper to put something on a shelf rather than hang it, so they are probably looking to sacrifice the display aspect to reduce costs.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    9. Re:There are good things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are great! With Hot Wheels cars I always peel the plastic away just enough to get them out but keep the package intact enough to slip them back in when I'm done playing.

    10. Re:There are good things by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about clamshell packaging is that it clearly displays the product itself, and usually so you can see most or all the sides of the product.

      Oh, if that would just be so..... Most clear clamshells contain cardboard INSIDE the clamshell that does one hell of a job of obscuring the actual product. This is especially a problem for headsets, where the connections, connectors and various fiddly bits are key indicators of quality.... except that they are hidden behind cardboard props. Makes the entire thing useless for figuring out what is actually inside.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    11. Re:There are good things by Nationless · · Score: 1

      ANECDOTE TIME.

      I was buying a generic gamepad for use on my comp packed in said clamshell. I couldn't figure out by reading the awkward documentation whether or not it had 2 or 4 shoulder buttons and they'd lovingly obscured the top part from every angle with cardboard. Since it wasn't it a box I could open and check, I simply left it.

    12. Re:There are good things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The real reason for this packaging is prevent damage, corrosion, and mildew, when the product is shipped from China to its final destination.

    13. Re:There are good things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. Yeah, I have a thumbnail-sized USB bluetooth dongle that came in a plastic clamshell. I cut off two edges so I can slide it back into the clamshell when I'm not using it - I can hardly imagine trying to keep track of that thing otherwise.

    14. Re:There are good things by swalve · · Score: 1

      Or you can do like fucking Costco and "reduce packaging" by replacing a clamshell with an 18" x 18" square of laminated plastic and cardboard with three SD cards in it.

    15. Re:There are good things by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Lastly, CFL bulbs need to be in clam shell packaging as it protects the product fairly well...

      I've bought 12-packs of CFLs that came in a cardboard box; that worked just fine.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    16. Re:There are good things by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      I always put them on a ring or small chain, then hang them from a paperclip that I keep specifically for small things like that. The paperclip is hung from the underside of a shelf, and is kept in place by being shoved into a ball of sticky-tack. This way, I have sticky-tack handy, as well as my thumb drives, USB micro-SD reader-ish devices, and a few spare keys for things.

    17. Re:There are good things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly would you put this on a ring?

  6. Clamshells are on their way out by Jeng · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Clamshells have been on their way out for a while now.

    Here is an example of what is replacing it.

    http://www.hpcorporategroup.com/the-benefits-of-natralockr-paperboard-packaging.html

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    1. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by hiryuu · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've worked with companies that are trying to drive a paper-based alternative to plastic clamshells, and while there's a modicum of market activity there, none of these packagers has yet to see the take-off they'd like. One of the challenges is that a paper-based package is going to require an adhesive system of some sort that provides the package as a ready-to-seal unit into which the widget-maker can drop his widget, without buying a lot of additional materials and equipment (such as adhesive and an application system).

      Want to make a self-sealing cardboard package? You could use a pressure-sensitive adhesive that would stick two flaps of cardboard together when the package is folded shut, but then you've got to have release liner covering the adhesive, or the adhesive film will end up bonded to whatever else it touches and/or pick up dirt and become useless in the shipping and handling portions of its pre-packaging life. (Think of the types of closure you see on a UPS "Red" overnight shipping box or envelope.)

      Another option is using a cohesive-type of product, where both sides are coated with an adhesive that sticks to itself but not to much else. These are great, except the bulk of them are made of natural rubber and have a very limited shelf-life before they "deaden" up and simply won't seal any longer. That makes it a definite possibility that your 10,000 purchased packaging units will really only allow you to use 3,000 of them to package your widgets before the packages stop sealing, within literally a month or two after they were created and sold to you.

      I'm not saying it can't be done - just that I've been watching the attempts to replace clamshells go on for years, and I've had a front-row seat to watch some of the limitations of the potential replacements.

      --
      Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    2. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It's being replaced by guys shaking hands in front of giant maps of the world?!?!?!?

      More seriously, while natralock is better, it still sucks.

    3. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd think they could put up a photograph of their packaging, rather than some cheesy stock "people shaking hands" photo.

    4. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by Jeng · · Score: 1
      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by jittles · · Score: 2

      HTC is starting to use adhesive free boxes that are very cleverly folded by a machine. They even come with a tab that you pull inside the box that allows you to easily break it down without fuss. I am rather a big fan.

    6. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by Hatta · · Score: 2

      The Natralock opens easily with a pair of household scissors.

      Problem unsolved.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    7. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by Megane · · Score: 1

      Silhouetted. In front of glowing giant maps of the world. Clearly they are evil overlords.

      So anyhow, two layers of cardboard stuck together, and little bits of plastic windows with tab edges stuck between. I've seen that a couple of times. Definitely worse for tidy returns than just cutting off the edges of clamshell plastic with scissors and taping it closed again.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    8. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes. Evil overlords are an improvement over plastic clamshells.

      The cardboard replacement is a little better, but having tried to pen these, in practice they are 70% as difficult to open with little to no risk of injury. An improvement yes, but still not good. Those pieces of cardboard are tough enough that you are not just going to poke a hole through them or easily tear them. The plastic is glued between the layers, so it doesn't just pull free. If your going to cut, you can still gut the plastic, or the paper from behind.

    9. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by DavidTC · · Score: 2

      The real problem with cardboard containers is that you can't stick them in a poorly-seal shipping container from China. They will get damp.

      Seriously, folks, they're selling us hermetically sealed containers. Think about it. Why would they do that? Look at the top of the clamshell...they seal up the fricking hole they punched in it to hang it with!

      They aren't doing that just for fun, they're doing that so they can have it in environments like a dusty road out of the village sweatshop, or in a mildew-filled warehouse, or on a cargo ship for two months. Then run a quick rinse over it, and, tada, good as new.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    10. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by swalve · · Score: 1

      Nearly as much plastic, plus a shitload of cardboard. Great.

    11. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Look at the top of the clamshell...they seal up the fricking hole they punched in it to hang it with!

      Only in vanishingly small percentage of the clamshells I've encountered.

    12. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Really? I urge you to look closely at them the next time. They'll either seal the hole itself by melting the plastic, seal further back around the hole with glue, or they'll just have the hole outside of the sealed area to start with. Don't assume that all the plastic is the 'sealed area'. Often they will have a flat poorly-sealed area at the top, and then seal across the middle, above the product.

      Now, there are a few systems that, instead of all that, just punch a 'hanging hole' in the boxes once they get over here, after their trip. Boxes designed that way used to be the normal at the start of clamshells, but that requires actual US employees, and such a thing is almost unheard of now. (And boxes designed that way are also almost unheard of. *rimshot*)

      And, of course, sometimes instead of making them airtight, they'll just put silica desiccant in them instead.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    13. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Really? I urge you to look closely at them the next time.

      Yes, really. I know this may be hard to believe, but just because my impressions are different than yours doesn't mean I haven't been observant.
       

      Now, there are a few systems that, instead of all that, just punch a 'hanging hole' in the boxes once they get over here, after their trip. Boxes designed that way used to be the normal at the start of clamshells, but that requires actual US employees, and such a thing is almost unheard of now.

      On the contrary, and as I indicated in my original reply, those are quite common - they're the vast majority of clamshells I encounter.

    14. Re:Clamshells are on their way out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it helps, I'm sitting here looking at one right now. It's a bit mangled now, but three sides were sealed at the edges and the fourth side is a fold. The top is punched and not sealed.

  7. We should sue them every time we cut ourselves by johnb10001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    when trying to open those packages with scissors, knives, screwdrivers, laser cutters, C4 then finally a nuclear bomb and the package is still not open

  8. I agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I agree, I hate the plastic clamshell anti-theft junk because it wastes so much plastic. These need to go away. Usually how I open them is I take a kitchen knife or pocket knife and just cut straight through the packaging right above where the object in it rests, take the object out, and the dump out anything else in it through that opening.

    We'd see a quick end to this crap if stores were required to open packaging at point of sale and then put a "opened by" sticker over it. Like when you buy pre-packaged sushi, meat, and stuff, so that you aren't harassed about potentially having stolen it.

  9. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by steveg · · Score: 5, Informative

    I got a handy little tool from Think Geek called "The Plastic Surgeon" that works pretty well.

    --
    Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
  10. I bought a pair of tinsnips for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bought a pair of tinsnips for these packages. Actually, it was a good excuse to get a tool that could CUT SHEET METAL. How bad is that? I had to laugh at the jokers selling special tools just for the packages. Screw that. Go out and get yourself a badass sheet metal cutting pair of tinsnips, and if you ever need to CUT METAL you're set too. OK, I never cut metal, but just knowing I can do it is cool.

    1. Re:I bought a pair of tinsnips for this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B0001WOKWQ The bulk of it is crap, but the knife on this thing goes through clamshell packaging like they were make out of paper and it handles really well.

  11. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by archen · · Score: 1

    I just use a wire cutters on everything.

  12. Yes they suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But what's neat is that people lose their cool over them.

  13. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Edison
    Team Edison's bulb.

  14. Marketing & Anti-Theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They weren't intended to be easy to open: they were intended to show off the product, keep it safe in transit, and make theft more difficult. Particularly for small/high value products (e.g. formerly flash memory) they bulked up the product size to make theft harder.

    Web shopping? Whoops, didn't think about that! They were designed for in-person shopping, and are now obsolete.

  15. Computer projector UI by dtmos · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My nominee would have been the user interface on substantially all computer projectors. At a typical meeting I attend -- the type of group doesn't seem to matter -- the first ten minutes is usually spent trying to figure out how to get the projector to work. "Is it on?" "Is it off?" "Is it plugged in?" "Is it warming up?" "Is it cooling down?" "Is the bulb bad?" "Is the cable bad?" "Is it receiving anything from the laptop?" etc. Not to mention the eleventeen connectors and plenty-two buttons, when all anyone ever uses -- at least in my experience -- is a PC laptop cable and the on/off switch.

    Whether it's a group of administrative assistants, football coaches, electrical technicians, farmers, or Ph.D. computer scientists, it's always the same. My kingdom for a projector that has a nice little LCD that tells me its present state, and what I need to do to either (a) see my presentation, or (b) turn it off, from there.

    1. Re:Computer projector UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have also seen:

      "Why can't I see the whole screen (resolution)?"

    2. Re:Computer projector UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or when it does display information on the screen:

      We just replaced the bulb, why is it still complaining?

      Uh, the filter is clean.

      Okay, how do we unfuckup the screen geometry?

      Why is everything wiggling?

    3. Re:Computer projector UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indicators, indicators! A simple 2x20 or 4x20 character lcd on many devices would a lifesaver.

      I've worked with a satellite modem that had three different colour LEDs all behind a red filter. The non-red LEDs were difficult to see. Obvious bad design.
      The serial link light never turned on and there was no reset sequence or button to make the device say "hello" over the serial link.
      The manual gave the wrong baud rate to use.
      The device echos serial input only if you start with AT, otherwise not.

      Of course now that I say this I realize I should be putting LCDs on the stuff I build.

    4. Re:Computer projector UI by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 1

      It wouldn't be a meeting without projector trouble.

      --
      "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    5. Re:Computer projector UI by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      Ugh, every fucking meeting I attend wastes 15 minutes at the start as some jackass tries to get a projector working with his laptop. These drain untold billions a year from our economy.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    6. Re:Computer projector UI by j2.718ff · · Score: 1

      This also brings up memories of college. The projector in the room would be on, but in standby mode. It would emit a high-pitch noise that approx 1/2 of the students could hear, and found annoying.

      I'd usually raise my hand, and ask the professor if he'd be so kind as to shut it off. But since it's completely lacking in UI, and since the professor could never hear it, all he could do is press buttons on the remote, and ask the students "is it off now?"

    7. Re:Computer projector UI by dissy · · Score: 0

      The absolute best (to watch others fight with) is when both the projector and the laptop have a sense detector for the signal.

      Turn on projector and hit "PC" button.. it looks for a signal for maybe 5 seconds and then flips back over to "Video"

      At the same time, the laptop is using the internal LCD and you hit a function key to flip to external VGA, only to have it detect no monitor connected and flip back to the internal display!

      If the timing isn't just right on both devices so that they see each other, the operator ends up looking like a lawn sprinkler swinging back and forth between laptop keyboard and pointing the remote up at the projector

    8. Re:Computer projector UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ride motorcycles and listen to loud music for about six months and you'll be in the other half of the students. Problem solved.

    9. Re:Computer projector UI by HideyoshiJP · · Score: 1

      This is very true. Be that as it may, some of it comes down to implementation. IT/Facilities needs to prepare the meeting room in such away to reduce user frustration and need the multitude of options to ensure they have the flexibility to support whatever comes their way. I believe there is a shortage in products suited "plug and play" style environments, or at the very least lack of research in the purchase process. It's all about having the right tool for the job.

    10. Re:Computer projector UI by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      The power LED on my Mitsubishi DLP TV is the WORST. If you unplug the TV for more than "a few minutes", it has to cold boot when you plug it in and turn it on for the first time. For about two MINUTES, there's literally no sign of life -- no power LED, no sound, light engine off. Then, the power LED starts blinking. For about 5 minutes. FINALLY, right around the point when you're convinced the bulb burned out, the color wheel is broken, or a capacitor in the power supply has burst... it visibly powers on.

      My Toshiba HD-DVD player was equally bad. You'd turn it on, and get NO SIGN OF LIFE for about 20 seconds. Apparently, whomever wrote the firmware forgot to toggle the bit that lights up the power LED. Jesus. And even then, it wasn't in a state where you could open and close the drawer for at least a minute or two. So, you'd press power, angrily tap your foot while counting to 30, press 'open' after seeing the light come on, then wait another 30-60 seconds for the drawer to actually slide open so you can insert the disc... which begins playing about a minute or two later.

      Then, there's my parents' old DVD recorder... which didn't even HAVE a LED anywhere on it. Literally. Not even a red power LED. If you got it into a state where it was upconverting to a video standard your TV couldn't handle, you were basically screwed. Besides hearing the disc spin up, there was no way to know it was even alive by looking at it. And to think I bitched 20 years ago when the first VCRs came out that eliminated LED channel numbers and mode indicators, and went entirely to OSD. At least back then, you knew that if all else failed, you had to connect it to "composite", or turn the TV to channel 3 or 4. Now, if you fsck the menu settings, you could get it into a mode where you'll literally never see any sign of life unless you systematically try HDMI, component video, s-video, and composite. Oh, did I mention that the piece of junk can't even simultaneously output to composite and s-video? For a while, I *dreaded* going to see my parents, because EVERY SINGLE TIME I went to see them, their DVD recorder was in a dysfunctional state & they needed me to burn my afternoon trying to make it work again.

  16. it's worse that that! by sribe · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and the little nicks and scrapes people incur as they just try to get their damn lightbulb out.

    Not to mention the estimate 6,000 - 7,000 people a year who get cut badly enough to seek treatment in emergency rooms!

    1. Re:it's worse that that! by jrmcc · · Score: 1

      Count me in that statistic, granted, I am a klutz but the scar on my thumb came from trying to open up a clamshell.

    2. Re:it's worse that that! by zerro · · Score: 3, Informative

      +1 yes ER doctors see quite a few severe injuries from these http://www.cpsc.gov/CPSCPUB/PUBS/REPORTS/2011rpt.pdf

    3. Re:it's worse that that! by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and the little nicks and scrapes people incur as they just try to get their damn lightbulb out.

      Not to mention the estimate 6,000 - 7,000 people a year who get cut badly enough to seek treatment in emergency rooms!

      If we're down to the 'several thousand' of a particular injury per year then we're in the territory of injuries due to contact with spacecraft (ICD 10 code WX849OXA), initial turtle attacks (W5921XA) or repetitive turtle attacks (W5921XD) and other similarly major dangers to civilization.

      Not to worry.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:it's worse that that! by Xaedalus · · Score: 1

      I don't know about you, but I live in mortal fear of getting the shit kicked out of me by turtles. Especially Raphael.

      --
      Here's to hot beer, cold women, and Glaswegian kisses for all.
    5. Re:it's worse that that! by virgnarus · · Score: 1

      Does the damages inflicted onto Shredder and his cronies accounts for most of W5921XA and W5921XD?

    6. Re:it's worse that that! by stubob · · Score: 1

      Since we're getting way off-topic, W5921XD refers to the subsequent encounter at the hospital, not by the turtle.So, if you need a follow-up visit for some reason, that's the code they use.

      And way, way off topic:V91.07 - burn due to water-skis on fire.

      --
      Planning to be moderated ± 1: Bad Pun.
    7. Re:it's worse that that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I clicked on the preview of your comment hoping that your username was "Bebob" or "Rocksteady"...

    8. Re:it's worse that that! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bebop!
      I can't even type today.

    9. Re:it's worse that that! by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Come on, Donatello uses freaking swords, he is much more scary.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    10. Re:it's worse that that! by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      If we're down to the 'several thousand' of a particular injury per year then we're in the territory of injuries due to contact with spacecraft (ICD 10 code WX849OXA), initial turtle attacks (W5921XA) or repetitive turtle attacks (W5921XD) and other similarly major dangers to civilization.

      It's turtles all the way down.

    11. Re:it's worse that that! by metaforest · · Score: 1

      If we're down to the 'several thousand' of a particular injury per year then we're in the territory of injuries due to contact with spacecraft (ICD 10 code WX849OXA), initial turtle attacks (W5921XA) or repetitive turtle attacks (W5921XD) and other similarly major dangers to civilization.

      Granted, this up-and-coming-viral-meme(tm) wrt ICD 10 codes is amusing. However, it shows a complete ignorance of how the codes are intended to be used.

      Any fool can string together a stream of endless nonsense from this coding system because of its flexibility. Much the same can be said for natural languages too.
      i.e.: Waffles, because ice cream has no bones.

      Stop thinking of ICD 10 as a hash table and recognize that it is a domain specific language with associated (but simple) grammar rules.

      You want to have fun? Try writing some poetry with it. /rant

  17. Security seals on DVDs and audio CDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Even after all the big box music retailers have gone out of business (so "shrinkage" is presumably less of an issue), many if not most CDs still come with safety seals on three sides underneath the cellophane wrap. Same with DVDs. I'm sure these have been partly responsible for plenty of trips to the ER over the years.

    1. Re:Security seals on DVDs and audio CDs by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Let's complain about something more fundamental... CD jewelboxes. Worst. Design. Ever. At least 1/3 of my old CDs from high school and college have broken tabs on their jewelboxes. And the amount of space they take up is unholy. I actually CELEBRATED when some labels ditched jewelboxes in favor of album-like cardboard envelopes.

      Then, let's complain about the construction of the discs themselves. I have discs from 25 years ago that barely have a visible scratch. I have a disc I bought last summer that almost became unplayable after I dropped it onto a tile floor in the living room. They've definitely lowered their durability and manufacturing standards over the past few years. It seems like new CDs are as fragile now as LPs used to be, if not more.

  18. Irony by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

    I remember a few years back an, only available on TV, ad for a special pair of scissors specifically designed to open these packages and yes it was sold in one of them.

  19. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by million_monkeys · · Score: 2

    I use a pair of scissors (or a utility knife in a pinch). The advantage is i can use them for other things and they don't require batteries. I hate those packages as much as the next person, but they really don't require a custom designed opening tool.

  20. Eh, 'hated' and 'worst' are hardly identical... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3

    It seems a bit unfair to call plastic clamshell packaging the 'worst design ever' just because the collateral damage don't like it very much...

    It can be inexpensively vacuum formed from plastic sheet stock, easily machine cut and sealed, allows items to be presented for display in a retail environment, and makes it harder for the small-but-valuable stuff to wander away. From the perspective of the actual customer(ie. the one who buys clamshell packaging, not you, you peon) it's actually quite a successful design.

    Obviously, it is out of place in mail-order environments, and now that a large amount of merchandise gets moved that way, I assume we'll see dedicated 'warehouse-only' packaging come to the fore; but clamshell has been phenomenally successful on the shop floor.

    In other news, shell-shocked civilians describe high-explosives as 'pretty lame' and 'about the worst ever'...

  21. Brick and Mortar won't last by andymadigan · · Score: 0

    This is just an example of why Brick and Mortar retailers won't survive. They focus so much on theft prevention that they don't care about customers anymore. Clamshell packages can be made easy to open, providing all the same benefits except theft prevention, but retailers won't hear of it. They see every customer as a criminal, which is why they've taken to demanding your receipt as you leave.

    Companies that want to stay in business are going to have to learn to treat customers well, providing 'adequate' service isn't going to cut it anymore.

    --
    The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    1. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Don't hand it over.

      I give them the option of calling the police and having me searched by a police officer or I shall give them the receipt and items back in exchange for a refund. I bought this crap, it is now mine and they have no right to search.

    2. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The receipt check as you leave isn't even because they think the customers are thieves. They treat you like a criminal because they believe their own employees are thieves.

    3. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      The receipt check as you leave isn't even because they think the customers are thieves. They treat you like a criminal because they believe their own employees are thieves.

      More like because they know their own employees are thieves. They just don't know which ones. Of course, they were honest when hired, but employees won't always stay honest if employers get them sufficiently PO'd .

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    4. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by bws111 · · Score: 2

      First, it is the manufacturer who packages the stuff, not the retailer.

      Second, if you want to be treated better as a customer, shop at a better store. If you are getting your receipt checked at the door, you are shopping somewhere whose main claim is that they are cheap. One of the ways they get so cheap is by minimizing shrinkage. Another is by paying a low wage, getting poorly motivated employees. You are the one making the determination 'get it cheap' or 'be treated well'.

      Finally, the 'checking your receipt at the door' is not necessarily that they don't trust the customer, it is that they don't trust the cashier. I have had my receipt checked (Sam's club) and there was an item in my cart not on the receipt. They did nothing do me, didn't even ask a single question. Just said 'have a nice day', and didn't make me pay for the item. But the checker did make a note of who the cashier was.

    5. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      Second, if you want to be treated better as a customer, shop at a better store.

      It goes both ways. If stores want better customers, treat them right. One big box store is short $10k/year just because I got tired of dealing with their ill-trained door Nazis. I never shop Best Buy, either, because they pull the same crap. I bet the thieves still shop there, though. They're not going to be outraged at being treated like thieves, are they?

      Sure, it's fine to vote with your wallet, but it's also fine to tell places that treat you poorly that you're willing to give them business if they treat you well.

    6. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by FSWKU · · Score: 1

      If you are getting your receipt checked at the door, you are shopping somewhere whose main claim is that they are cheap.

      Ever been forced to purchase something at Best Buy recently? They check receipts all the time and sure as hell can't claim their prices are cheap, which is why more and more people are avoiding the hell out of them (to say nothing of the rampant ignorance of their employees).

      --
      "So after all this, you make my case for me. To end this stalemate, you must die..."
    7. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Stores do not care about 'better customers'. Stores, like all businesses, care about profit. Treating you better costs them real money. $10K/year is revenue, not profit. The profit from your $10K/year is not going to make up for the increased cost to them. To make up that cost they must raise prices, and all the customers who are there solely because the price is low (which is 99% of their customers) and who don't particularly care how they are treated, are going to find somewhere cheaper.

      Some places (like Walmart) have a business model that is to attract as many customers as possible by offering the lowest price. Other places have a business model that is to attract very few high-paying customers.

      Going to Walmart or its ilk and telling them you would shop there if they treated you better is like going to a high-end dress shop and telling them you would shop there if they lowered their prices. They don't care. Walmart is there to provide low prices, and customer service suffers for it. The high-end shop is there to provide excellent service, and it is reflected in the price. And there are loads of other stores between those two extremes, with varying degrees of service and price.

    8. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by bws111 · · Score: 1

      Forced to buy something at Best Buy? No, never. However, I have voluntarily purchased things at Best Buy recently, and I have always found their prices to be at the very low end for brick and mortar stores. The only time I have ever had my receipt checked at the door was when I had an item that was too large to bag.

    9. Re:Brick and Mortar won't last by swalve · · Score: 1

      The manufacturers put it into whatever container the larger retailers ask for. How do you think Costco and Sam's Klub get those oddball sizes that aren't available anywhere else? (OK, actually, Costco runs a lot of their own packaging operations. They buy the shit in bulk and repackage it.)

  22. Consumer preference won't drive change here. by hiryuu · · Score: 2

    Plastic clamshell packaging has always been a nightmare from an end-consumer's perspective, and yes, there's lip-service paid to changing things in the words of major retailers and consumer goods distributors, but it's not likely to change because of "wrap rage." Clamshell packaging is adored by the retail industry for a handful of reasons:

    A.) Product visibility: transparent plastic packaging that hugs the product, displays it prominently, and can showcase it visibly with flashy liners and inserts is just loved by marketing departments. Using corrugated boxes, trays, or cartons just isn't sexy if you're pushing a mostly-commoditized consumer good.

    B.) Tamper evidence and loss prevention: opening boxes is easy. Opening a clamshell is difficult and noticeable, particularly if you're an unscrupulous retail employee trying to get the widget out of the package and into your pockets without the embedded loss-prevention device (RFID, etc.) coming with it.

    C.) Cost of packaging: getting something into paper or corrugated boxes and cartons is a slow and expensive process, in terms of unit throughput, materials, and equipment/process complexity. Mechanical fastening (staples, etc.) is slow, adhesive application systems aren't cheap and aren't much faster, and self-seal packaging comes with a host of other issues that contribute to waste and cost. By comparison, a clamshell packaging process can be quick, with a minimum of material and significantly less scrap.

    Until boxes are cheaper and faster - until the cost per unit in time, money, materials, and processing is lower using paper packaging than clamshells - those nasty, finger-slicing hunks of PVC, PET, and polycarbonate aren't going anywhere.

    --
    Karma: Excellent, but still won't get you laid.
    1. Re:Consumer preference won't drive change here. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You keep saying stuff like this. It's not going to be well received on this thread. You're just lucky we're on the Internet or we might be tempted to stuff YOU into one of those nifty little shells.

      Just sayin'.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Consumer preference won't drive change here. by sjames · · Score: 1

      A.) Product visibility: transparent plastic packaging that hugs the product, displays it prominently, and can showcase it visibly with flashy liners and inserts is just loved by marketing departments. Using corrugated boxes, trays, or cartons just isn't sexy if you're pushing a mostly-commoditized consumer good.

      So important that they typically cover the product with little cardboard inserts or stickers on the outside.

      B.) Tamper evidence and loss prevention: opening boxes is easy. Opening a clamshell is difficult and noticeable, particularly if you're an unscrupulous retail employee trying to get the widget out of the package and into your pockets without the embedded loss-prevention device (RFID, etc.) coming with it.

      Blister packs and sealed poly bags are also tamper evident and generate nowhere near the consumer hatred.

      C.) Cost of packaging: getting something into paper or corrugated boxes and cartons is a slow and expensive process, in terms of unit throughput, materials, and equipment/process complexity. Mechanical fastening (staples, etc.) is slow, adhesive application systems aren't cheap and aren't much faster, and self-seal packaging comes with a host of other issues that contribute to waste and cost. By comparison, a clamshell packaging process can be quick, with a minimum of material and significantly less scrap.

      And those clever little clamshell packages automatically place the product inside, close and weld themselves shut with no special machinery at all. AMAZING!

    3. Re:Consumer preference won't drive change here. by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      Plastic clamshell packaging has always been a nightmare from an end-consumer's perspective, and yes, there's lip-service paid to changing things in the words of major retailers and consumer goods distributors, but it's not likely to change because of "wrap rage."

      It will stop once retailers and manufacturers start getting sued for the injuries caused by opening the packages. A few multi-million-dollar punitive awards will concentrate the mind wonderfully. Since the CPSC, despite documenting thousands of injuries every year, hasn't seen fit to do anything about it, the courts may have to step in.

  23. WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can't open a package but you can write an article. I wonder what's more difficult?

  24. People are weak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People who have trouble with packages and stuff like this are the same people that run with scissors.

  25. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by gl4ss · · Score: 1

    http://boaty.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/bare.jpg

    a knife works too. the problem is that you don't have one while at the office, bus-stop or wherever.

    theft prevention and being cheap as fuck to put together are the reasons for these horrible packages though.

    --
    world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  26. Very interesting by anonymousNR · · Score: 1

    But what part of this news makes it nerdy ?? I am little confused.

    --
    -- It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. -- Aristotle
    1. Re:Very interesting by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      If you can't figure out what is neat and nerdy about discussing packaging, you are probably too cool for this group.

  27. Re:CFL light bulb by firex726 · · Score: 1

    Personally I don't like their charge up time.
    I'll turn one on and it'll be five minutes or so before it's at full strength.

    Used both cheapo dollar store ones to more quality GE and Phillips brands. I just refuse to use them now.

  28. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just pierce the casing with a knife in a flat spot, it tears apart easily from there. Having said that, that packaging truly sucks.

  29. This is a public service announcement by Bogtha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Use a can opener.

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:This is a public service announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how the fuck am I supposed to open the packaging with one of these?

      http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-Mczmq0_6DxM/TiAZxo4fpoI/AAAAAAAAEo8/9Esa-S9j6FQ/s640/Canopener+Sieger-2.jpg

  30. One word by cyberzephyr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Scissors

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
    1. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      INSUFFICIENT!

      I've settled on keeping a "construction chisel" that is basically a giant-ass Tanto-blade knife w/ a blade thick enough and flat enough on one side to literally hammer on. Chop, chop, bang, bang, packaging is open.

      Or 2x4 is split in two.

      Which gives a good indication of just how tough these clamshells are, admittedly.

    2. Re:One word by asylumx · · Score: 1

      Scissors

      Which really are the best solution. Unless, of course, you just bought a pair of scissors and they are sealed in a plastic welded clam-shell themselves.

    3. Re:One word by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      Scissors aren't good enough due to the lack of flat surfaces on the packaging. Even if you do manage to cut off the seal, the edge tends to be jagged and dangerous.

    4. Re:One word by Amouth · · Score: 1

      And when the Scissors are in clam shell packaging?

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    5. Re:One word by luther349 · · Score: 1

      c4

    6. Re:One word by suutar · · Score: 1

      I tend to have to use my tin snips; scissors are usually too wimpy. Can opener works pretty well as long as the package stays gripped.

    7. Re:One word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HEAVY DUTY scissors.

      Ordinary scissors don't work so well for me - I've started using kitchen shears and they're pretty good. But even thought that makes the act of opening easy, it still results in the creation of sharp piece of plastic.

    8. Re:One word by volmtech · · Score: 1

      Two words, EMT scissors.

  31. "Curb Your Enthusiasm" touched on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hi -

    The wonderful HBO series "Curb Your Enthusiasm" worked this idea into a storyline in season seven.

    Here is some of it:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R8HZbWusMDI

    - Tom, Redondo Beach, California

  32. Link Please! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw on youtube last night of a bulb covering a bathroom with smoke/soot as it burned-out (normal operation according to the manufacturer). It cost the family thousands of dollars because they wanted to save a few pennies.

    Seriously, link please (if you were logged into youtube it should be in your history). I've never heard of this and would like to know if it's you fear mongering or legitimately as common as you say.

    1. Re:Link Please! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      There's many CFLs in my place-of-residence and the few that have gone out have done so not with expelled smoke, soot, or a bang, but a harmless flicker (though the bulbs do turn black in one or two parts near the base as they near their end of life). They've also lasted MUCH longer than the incandescents (months or years, instead of weeks).

      Maybe I've been lucky, but you'll find no loathing of CFLs from me.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  33. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You may be interested to know that Philips manufactures a line of domestic incandescent light bulbs that use 50% less electricity, last twice as long and yet still have a low per-unit cost.

  34. Opening a package. by dtmos · · Score: 2

    I wonder what's more difficult?

    Writing is, quite literally, child's play. Plastic clamshell packaging, on the other hand, is child-resistant, if not actually child-proof.

  35. Re:CFL light bulb by smagruder · · Score: 1

    Might help us see your point if you gave us links for these claims.

    --
    Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  36. Snopes Says You're Full of Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    They suck. If the only think wrong with a CFL bulb was the "clamshell" packaging, I'd actually be happy. I saw on youtube last night of a bulb covering a bathroom with smoke/soot as it burned-out (normal operation according to the manufacturer). It cost the family thousands of dollars because they wanted to save a few pennies.

    How full of shit is he Johnny? Well, Bob, he's pretty darn full of shit. Nothing in there indicates it could cover a bathroom.

    1. Re:Snopes Says You're Full of Shit by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      Yes because snopes is a reliable source of information (not). Why it's just as reliable as wikipedia (not... it's less reliable). Snopes is the answer to everything because the author is all-knowing and flawless, and there's never any reason to doubt the word of that dude. (I'm being sarcastic.)

      Here's the video of a bathroom destroyed by a CFL as it reached its end-of-life and burned. Note: As I said I can't access youtube from work, so there's no way for me to verify I have the right link. (If not you can use your engineering skills to do you own search.)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bubJX-m_HSs
      2nd vid I just found http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kALiIcrDGec

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Snopes Says You're Full of Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely anything can happen when companies are busy faking UL markings and nobody goes to jail for it:

      http://www.cbc.ca/marketplace/pre-2007/recalls/reclfull/2005/29june2005.html

      Funny that bulb is a completely different bulb than the one in the shitty Snopes article, yet it bears an American safety mark (although it seems to have been commonly sold in Canada, no reason it wouldn't have been sold in the USA).

      I never knew Snopes had such shitty articles. These shitty bulbs have been around half a decade before that worthless Snopes article. Guess there's no reason to trust the shitty Snopes "news" source. Shit.

    3. Re:Snopes Says You're Full of Shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (If not you can use your engineering skills to do you own search.)

      Sorry, but I already "know" that I am right, so have no reason to waste the time trying to prove me wrong. If you want me to change my mind, you're going to have to do your own research.

      Also, what makes youtube more reliable than Snopes and Wikipedia?

  37. It's due to an open border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and a clash of cultures. These things have become pervasive over the last 15 years or so which is also when we've gotten so lax on border control. Shoplifting and theft in general is pretty common south of the border and with more people moving up here it's going to follow.

  38. Arrrrr. by Steauengeglase · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is exactly what a filthy pirate who is smuggling counterfeit light bulbs would say!

  39. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    Who leaves the house without at least one knife?

    I went to Golden Coral with my family on mothers day and was unable to cut the steak with the butter knife they provide at the table. I wouldn't have been able to find the edible half of that slab of gristle without my razor sharp folding pocket knife.

  40. Haha... by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    We've gotten e-mails from customers who've purchased scissors in a clamshell, which would require another pair of scissors to open the package

    I wonder how many people ran into this problem, and went to the store to buy another pair of scissors, only to get home and realize they still have the same problem :P

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  41. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They suck. If the only think wrong with a CFL bulb was the "clamshell" packaging, I'd actually be happy. I saw on youtube last night of a bulb covering a bathroom with smoke/soot as it burned-out (normal operation according to the manufacturer). It cost the family thousands of dollars because they wanted to save a few pennies.

    If it was an isolated incident, I wouldn't care, but there are dozens of videos like that.

    I've had plenty of CFLs burn out over the years. They just go out. No smoke, let alone anything that could cover a room in soot. I'll agree that it shouldn't be brushed off by the manufacturer and that, if it really were widespread, it should be addressed as the defect it is, but it's not normal.

    I suspect if some student or professor with spare time performed a study, they'd find CFLs actually cost MORE money (and energy) overall than using the old Edison bulb (incandescent bulb). Similar to how ACEEE.org performed a study and found a grid-powered EV actually emits more pollution/greenhouse gases than a 50 or higher MPG gasoline or diesel car.

    Testing something like emissions from vehicles has got a lot more complexity and variables than the childishly-simple-to-determine power consumption of a light bulb. They're sold by their consumption. They produce an equivalent amount of light while consuming a fraction of the power. Unless you don't believe their rated consumption - their regulated, enforced, legally culpable consumption - it's not really up for debate. Go to the hardware store and grab some light bulb sockets, wire and batteries, and you can put it to the test yourself for $20. There are plenty of complaints one might make about mercury, advertised life, cost, flickering, color tone, but I've never seen very many people try to claim CFLs don't really consume less power.

  42. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good way to ruin your wire cutters.

  43. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by h4rr4r · · Score: 2

    Why don't you have one at the office or bus-stop?

    I always have my skeletool in my pocket. Pocket knives are cheap and extremely useful tools. I suggest keeping one in your towel.

  44. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

    I got a handy little tool from Think Geek called "The Plastic Surgeon" that works pretty well.

    Did it come in a plastic clamshell package?

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  45. There's an old invention for this by na1led · · Score: 1

    It's called a KNIFE!

    --
    -- By all means let's be open-minded, but not so open-minded that our brains drop out.
  46. Wiss 20R Carpet Shears by aoeu · · Score: 1

    4 1/2 inch blades and very heavy (nearly a pound) duty. Makes short safe work out of this kind of package.

    --
    All your database are belong to U.S.
    1. Re:Wiss 20R Carpet Shears by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Close enough to what I was going to say to tag along here instead of starting a new thread. I use Kitchenaid kitchen shears, or sometimes Cuisinart ones. The former was part of a kit, the latter came with a food processor, either way they are decent but not fantastic. Scissors or shears make quick work of this packaging once you get home and need to open it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  47. Obligatory by nukeade · · Score: 1

    It was designed by the space devil.

    http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2002/09/30

  48. Re:CFL light bulb by MojoRilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There were 243 million CFL's sold in the US in 2009. And there were 34 reports of smoke, and 4 reports of fire in a US consumer product safety database from March 2011 through December of 2011 (see this article for more information). Seems like a pretty safe product to me.

    In terms of your supposition that CFL's actually cost more than incandecents? Here is a study that says no, In terms of the ACEEE.org study, I can't find specifics (unless you are talking about the 2006 study, which is hopelessly out of date). But electric cars top the ACEEE.org list of cleanest cars this year.

  49. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I call BS on this. Not that the videos aren't real but that a manufacturer would claim that this is normal operation. In my experience with CFLs in my own home, as well as friends and family, the typical failure mode is the same as an incandescent; the bulb just goes out.

    If I had to guess what would cause a CFL to smoke I would say it was a ballast failure, which is the thick part of the base. I haven't seen a CFL fail like that but I have seen them fail in a standard fluorescent light fixture and they can smoke and stink.

    And as far as the frequency of this kind of failure, given that millions if not billions of these bulbs have been sold I would characterize dozens of videos as "isolated incidents".

  50. GE Spacesaver Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my house we get little power fluctuations on average about once a week or so (I have good line conditioners for my computers), and whenever I get one of these little fluctuations the microwave looses it's time. Unfortunately whom ever came up with the requirements for this product decided that it was imperative that the microwave know the current time, day, month and year in order to cook my bean burrito for 30 seconds, and the process to enter this information takes like ten minutes! WHY ON EARTH DO YOU NEED TO KNOW WHAT YEAR IT IS TO COUNT DOWN FROM 30 TO 0?!?!?!?!

    1. Re:GE Spacesaver Microwave by sudonymous · · Score: 1

      Leap seconds. And yes, it can run Linux.

    2. Re:GE Spacesaver Microwave by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      That's stupid design. I have a microwave oven but keep it unplugged when I am not using it. It never complains about not knowing the time (it just defaults to 00:00 when plugged in), I can just heat up the food and unplug the oven again.

    3. Re:GE Spacesaver Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "Leap second" is not relevant when cooking an item for a fixed length of time. This is a fixed period (say 30 seconds) that has nothing to do with the current time. I can count to 30 without having to know what time it is. The microwave has no need to know what the current time is, only the amount of time you wish to cook your food (and maybe a power level, but again, that has nothing to do with the current time or date), and as such requiring that the time and date be set in order to cook something for a fixed length of time is just absolutely stupid.

    4. Re:GE Spacesaver Microwave by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Indeed.

      Coffee makers need the time, because you can make them do something at a specific time. VCRs need the time, because you can make them do something at a specific time. Many radios need the time, because you can make them do something at a specific time. Automated thermostats need the time, because you can make them do something at a specific time.

      There is no way to make a microwave do something a specific time, so NO ONE NEEDS A FUCKING CLOCK ON THEIR MICROWAVE.

      This is not goddamn rocket science. This is not, has never been, and will never been the slightest reason to have a clock on a microwave. These only exist because of some sort of ego-trip that microwave makers were on when they were almost the sole device in the home controlled by microprocessor and had an LED display, so it was like LOOK AT MY FANCY COCK! I MEAN CLOCK!

      Now, I have no real issue with building clocks in things that don't need clocks.(1) I mean, no car radio has any sort of alarm, so doesn't use the time, but most of them have clocks, but you don't see me complaining about this. But why the fuck do half of the microwave makers seem to assume this is some vitally important function for microwaves to perform and thus require you to set it when the power goes out? (The other half have been beaten with a cluestick and no longer require this.) I don't have to set my car radio time to use my car, or even to use my damn radio.

      1) Although I have to question what sort of added power consumption in a microwave that is adding for no reason at all. Hopefully there's some sort of low-power power supply thing going on.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:GE Spacesaver Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a joke.

    6. Re:GE Spacesaver Microwave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coffee makers need the time, because you can make them do something at a specific time.

      No, they don't. I use this to make the coffee maker do something at a specific time. And it turns it off, too, so the coffee doesn't burn.

  51. Intel!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone remember Intel BOX CPUs???

  52. annoying vs. life & death by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

    Pinto?

    --
    blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  53. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was told you can just drop it on a rock from a high location (but I'm gullible).

  54. Make the stores open them by beegle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd like to see a law that stipulates that any store that offers products in plastic clamshell packaging MUST be willing to open all of the packages in the checkout line (no "go wait in a separate customer service line after paying") at no extra charge. Those packages would be gone within a year.

    Right now, clamshell packaging is a huge win for the store, but all of the customer frustration is an externality. By forcing the stores to deal with the externality, we align store interests with consumer interests.

    --
    --
    1. Re:Make the stores open them by swalve · · Score: 1

      Or, at the very least, be required to take back the empty packaging.

    2. Re:Make the stores open them by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, pass a law.

      Two stupids don't make a smart.

  55. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could just use a standard box cutter. I've honestly never understood why this is such a hassle for some people.

  56. Just steal the whole package. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The only way those cases stopped the drug addicts I knew as a teen is if they were LARGE; otherwise it all fits into a coat well enough. They sure have enough cameras now in the mega stores everybody goes to...

    My complaint is they use #2 plastic which is not recycled in my area (but bottles they take - because those are almost always #2) and #2 has no solvent glue so I can't make that much with it - yes, I keep large packaging for using later. If they use it, it should be a bioplastic that can dissolve within my lifetime... but not that evil plastic being used today where they just use a weak binder in conventional plastic so you end up with microscopic plastic particles that last for centuries, which are already showing up in every creature on earth (including us... the large portion of which is thought to come from CLOTHING plastic not from broken down large items!!! BTW, #2 is polyester so is #1.) I've always had a horrible time thermowelding #1 and #2 but its supposed to be possible if you get the temp just right.

    1. Re:Just steal the whole package. by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      #2 is HDPE, it is very commonly recycled. I would suggest you make sure it is not recycled in your area. #2 plastic can be hot air welded. There are some glues for it, but most require quite a bit of prep to the service.

      #1 is PET, while technically a polyester it is not commonly used to make clothing.

  57. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    I think the "cheap as fuck" bit is probably the most important, since many clamshells still use press-locks instead of hermetic sealing (and press-locks are obviously useless at theft prevention). These things are probably very easy to set up a fully-automated assembly line to put together, whereas cardboard boxes usually require humans to pack products in.

  58. Not all airships used hydrogen by asdf7890 · · Score: 0

    the Hindenburg (and other airships of the time) were filled with Hydrogen

    This is not generally true. All German airships were filled with that. Many American ones contained the inert (though more expensive) helium instead, but America pretty much had the monopoly on helium extraction/production and wouldn't let the Germans have any. The designers of the hydrogen lifted ships knew the dangers and tried (not entirely successfully of course) to mitigate them, but they didn't have much alternative at the time. The Hindenburg's spectacular end killed all public confidence in any airship design though, not just those with the fatally dangerous flaw of being floating bombs, so that part of the industry collapsed almost overnight.

    1. Re:Not all airships used hydrogen by LeadSongDog · · Score: 1

      Right, because a burning gas which floats quickly upward is SO much more dangerous than a burning liquid which pools underfoot. The lesson from the Hindenburg should have been that "most passengers survived, let's figure out how to up the number." Instead they went to gasoline powered bits of linen and balsa wood in a quest for safety. Twits!

      --
      Oh, I'm sorry sir, I thought you were referring to me, Mr. Wensleydale.
    2. Re:Not all airships used hydrogen by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      Yes. The only reason people died during the Hinderburg is that they didn't know what to do, and tried to jump out of the damn thing when it was too high. (Well, except for that poor slob who jumped out at the right time, survived the jump, but then had the thing land on him.)

      Of course, they only tried to jump out because the structure was on fire, and they thought it would collapse on them afterwards. Again, the structure was on fire, not the hydrogen...hydrogen explodes, and it floats, obviously, so it's not like it was hanging around to cause any harm. The framework and skin was what was burning.(1)

      But is it is possible to have a 100% safe hydrogen dirigible. (Well, barring collision with an airplane or it landing on someone.)

      All you have to do is have like five or so separate hydrogen chambers, kept far enough apart that they can't reach each other, and in a way that any explosion is directed straight up, so that it just sorta vents a single giant flame out the top then coasts to the ground.

      And build the structure out of asbestos or something.

      People forget that, back then, everything caught fire and killed people. Just ask theatre-goers. Nowadays, we can actually build things with fire-stops and emergency doors and whatnot, and the hydrogen explosion and fire isn't going to kill anyone...it didn't even kill anyone back then! The entire damn airship being on fire, thus causing people to jump, is what killed people.

      But if we build one correctly, the only danger would be the cabin making an emergency landing on people.

      1) Some people assert that the skin was painted with some flammable paint, and I think Mythbusters did something to demonstrate it might be true. But regardless of why everything else was on fire, the fact is that the 'hydrogen' was not. Hydrogen does not sit in place on fire. There might have been holes slowly feeding hydrogen into the fire...but that, as I said, is easily fixed by building an emergency venting system to let it out the top.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    3. Re:Not all airships used hydrogen by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      But regardless of why everything else was on fire, the fact is that the 'hydrogen' was not.

      But, if I'm understanding correctly, one of the reasons that the entire structure set ablaze so fast was because the hydrogen combusted in its entirety very quickly, transferring the heat of the reaction to almost the entire structure practically in an instant.

      As you say a hydrogen based airship can be made safe with modern techniques, limiting the effect of any ignition that does occur and using better materials for the rest of the design too. But a different gas being used to impart lift would also have made the day very different.

    4. Re:Not all airships used hydrogen by swalve · · Score: 1

      The hydrogen didn't explode, it burned.

    5. Re:Not all airships used hydrogen by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      But, if I'm understanding correctly, one of the reasons that the entire structure set ablaze so fast was because the hydrogen combusted in its entirety very quickly, transferring the heat of the reaction to almost the entire structure practically in an instant.

      No one actually knows why it burned so quickly.

      An interesting fact is that hydrogen does not burn at a frequency the human eye can see, except maybe shifting a bit into blue. Whereas, although you can't tell from the black and white footage, all the big flames were red. So all the flames in the footage you see are something else burning.

      However, you are probably correct, in that at least the initial hydrogen burning (Which almost no eyewitnesses seemed to have noticed, and we have no footage of, as the cameras hadn't started yet.) heated up the structure of the ship to the point that the flames spread very quickly. It's pretty much the only way the flames on the skin could have spread downward, which they clearly do.

      As you say a hydrogen based airship can be made safe with modern techniques, limiting the effect of any ignition that does occur and using better materials for the rest of the design too.

      A major problem is that the hydrogen bags were close enough to each other to damage the next one when they exploded, and that they were confined inside the skin together. So the heat of the explosion had nowhere else to go.

      Put the hydrogen in long strong 'heat-retardant barrels' with a thin-ish top, without anything above them, and direct any explosion upward. And don't coat the skin with stupid flammable paint.

      Problem solved.

      Seriously, this was back in the day when no one bothered to protect against fire. Five years later, 492 people would die in a nightclub fire in Boston. No one suggested that nightclubs were untenable. No, we fixed building codes, and actually started enforcing it.

      But a different gas being used to impart lift would also have made the day very different.

      Well, yeah. For one thing, there would have been no Hindenburg in the first place. The Germans had no helium.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
  59. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Talderas · · Score: 1

    Swiss army knife. Press through top corner, slice down. Press through other top corner. Slice down. Array package on side. press through top corner and slide down. Voila.

    --
    "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
  60. A better comic by Daetrin · · Score: 2

    Thought not part of the usual obligatory set:

    http://thedevilspanties.com/archives/6062

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  61. Useless for Online Shopping by asylumx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These clam-shell packages are useful for brick-and-mortar stores trying to prevent theft, however these same packages offer no benefit for online retailers. I understand that it's difficult for a company to set up different packaging lines based on whether their product is going to an online retailer or a brick-and-mortar retailer, but that's what I'd like to see happen nonetheless.

  62. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by The+Mighty+Buzzard · · Score: 1

    I got annoyed one Christmas and found the perfect tool for opening them, the band saw. Four quick passes and every sealed edge is removed with significantly less danger of injury despite the far more powerful cutting device.

    --
    Violence is like duct tape. If it doesn't solve the problem, you didn't use enough.
  63. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

    Just grab a pair of trauma shears. You can cut through a penny with them, a clamshell package isn't a big deal.

    --
    I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
  64. Just another example of punishing the innocent by drdrgivemethenews · · Score: 1

    The bane of our times: a few people (shoplifters in this case) do something bad, and the immediate reaction is to make life harder on everyone else.

    -----

    Testing, 0, 1, 2... -- Donald Knuth

  65. funny funny.. by 3seas · · Score: 1

    having recently purchased some item (don't recall what it was) in such packaging I used scissors to cut the edge off so to remove the item..... only to then realize it had a perfed back and finger hole to grab the back panel and rip it at the perf.........

  66. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    I got a handy tool called a pocket knife. In the old days it was rare to not have one on you at all times.

  67. Worst design ever - Office Multifunction Copiers by joeflies · · Score: 2

    Ever try to scan to email lately? Try using the touch panel on a multifunction copier? It's an exercise in frustration and aggravation. Even machines that don't have scan set up seem to go happily along pretending to do something and actually doing nothing. It's an area that's ripe for innovation for any company that can investigate how to build a better UI.

  68. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by mhajicek · · Score: 1

    Indeed. I carry a Leatherman plus a cheap lockback.

  69. Plastic Sealed Packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd propose that, before approving any type of plastic hard-shell wrap for a product, the company's execs need to be locked in a room for three days with the only food and water available wrapped in the same type of package. If they can survive without the help of knives, scissors or any external tool, then the product can ship.

  70. Microwaves... by sconeu · · Score: 1

    I want to shoot the idiot that thought a single unlabelled dial was the best interface for a microwave oven.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  71. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by idontgno · · Score: 1

    I think the "cheap as fuck" bit is probably the most important, since many clamshells still use press-locks instead of hermetic sealing (and press-locks are obviously useless at theft prevention).

    I've seen a few packages with both hermetical sealing AND press-locks...with the press locks OUTSIDE of the hermetical seal. This would be closer to "stupid as fuck", since cutting away the seal cuts away the press-locks too.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  72. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Jeng · · Score: 1

    I always keep a cheap folder on me, but there are some places you cannot go with a knife, luckily you don't normally have to open packages in those places.

    I hear that pocket knifes are illegal in New York City though, that has gotta suck.

    --
    Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
  73. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by jawtheshark · · Score: 1

    I also use this technique.

    --
    Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  74. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Very this. Although I've found it even easier if the knife you have is serrated all the way to the tip. The plastic 'catches' on one of the serrations, and you don't even really have to press into the plastic as you slice downwards.

    Hah: Captcha - 'Gasoline' - the last-case scenario to opening the packaging :P

  75. Blister-pack by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 2

    I have always heard of these packages referred to as "blister-packs"

    --
    Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    1. Re:Blister-pack by RabidReindeer · · Score: 0

      I have always heard of these packages referred to as "blister-packs"

      Only if it was shrink-moulded around the product, and that's no longer that common. Shrink-moulding usually uses softer plastics and is therefore safer to open.

      Personally, I call them "laceration packs". And that's being too kind, considering that opening many of them have come close to slashing major arteries and/or tendon damage. That hard plastic is the next best thing to a knife. Often the shape of the package will send a knife or scissors skittering out of control, injuring both purchaser and product.

      Reducing theft is one thing, but maiming your customers is a bit much.

      It's really incredible what consumers will tolerate.

    2. Re:Blister-pack by artor3 · · Score: 2

      Blister packs are plastic on one side and cardboard or foil on the other, e.g. what batteries or pills tend to come in. They're much easier to open. Clamshells are plastic on both sides, and feed on human suffering. A minor, but important difference.

    3. Re:Blister-pack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blister packs are a plastic shell stuck to a cardboard back, so they can easily be opened by tearing the cardboard.

      Clamshells are pure plastic.

  76. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by sconeu · · Score: 1

    I went to Golden Coral

    Well, that's your problem. Coral is known to be hard to cut.

    Seriously, though. That is your problem... Going to Golden Corral.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  77. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... It's called a band saw :-P

  78. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    It was mothers day, I didn't get to pick the restaurant.

  79. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Other than airports and court I can't really think of any.

    NY state has some restrictions, but I do not think even NYC bans them outright. They just have to be under 4" blades and cannot be flicked open.

  80. I will buy this if you open it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple tell the cashier you want them to open the package after you buy it. If they refuse tell them you don't want it and make them put it back on the shelves. This will get your point across to the store which i would hope would eventually make its way back to the manufacturer. Or at least influence the store's product selection.

    1. Re:I will buy this if you open it by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      No, that will just persuade the cashier that you're a jerk, make them have a slightly worse day, and unless people do this in numbers, never make it even to the store manager, let alone the manufacturer.

  81. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    It's probably not stupid at all; it's probably done for manufacturing. They probably have some machine that folds the package over and presses it closed, and then sends it on to the next machine. Then that machine does the hermetic sealing. The press-locks probably aren't for end-users at all.

    You guys seem to be looking at things entirely from the viewpoint of the end-user, and totally ignoring the manufacturer and all the trouble they have to go to to package your widget.

  82. I found a viable solution for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Rule 1: buy it elsewhere without the packaging.
    Rule 2: get the shop to remove the packaging for you.

    At least here in Germany shops have to accept the packaging of the products they sold you.

  83. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by sjames · · Score: 1

    Usually, yes. I have dealt with clamshell packages where if your knife is any less sharp than a razor you're likely to need considerable force to cut through. An accident waiting to happen.

  84. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

    Why spend money on that when a conventional box cutter works.

  85. Stopped At Customs - Plasticus Domesticus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I worked in consumer electronics (we made electronic books, http://www.franklin.com), and the funnyest thing I ever heard was that US-Customs stopped a shipment, and wanted to know what species of clam we where importing. The answer was: Plasticus Domesticus...

  86. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a knife works too. the problem is that you don't have one while at the office, bus-stop or wherever.

    Actually, I do.
    I never have been able to understand the mentality of people who don't carry a knife and a flashlight everywhere. I get that some governments are a lot more oppressive than mine, but I don't know anywhere where a small (1.5" blade or so) non-locking folder is illegal. Even in the UK, which is widely regarded in the US as knife-law hell, it's my understanding any non-locking folder less than 3" is allowed, if you can provide a "good" (i.e. non-self-defense), specific reason to carry it. Such as "to open clamshell packaging".

  87. What about lamps? by Quirkz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lamps have infuriating and nonsensical design problems.

    1. The switch is almost always put in the most inaccessible of places: behind the lamp shade where you can't see it, can't peek around the shade if the light is on because it's too bright, can't peek around the shade if the light is off because it's too dark, and if you feel around with your fingers you risk being burned by the bulb. Also, most table lamps are set in a position where you really need a second elbow to be able to reach under, across, and back up to reach the switch. A sensible lamp switch should always be visible.

    2. Inconsistent activation methods: you've got knobs, pull strings, little pins to push, sometimes levers. Your own lamps you get used to often enough, but any new lamp is always a mystery and takes far too much investigation just to figure out how it works. Particularly when the lever is entirely hidden (see #1 above). A sensible switch mechanism should be obvious at a glance.

    3. Poor durability. Despite the fact that every lamp has basically exactly one moving part, that part breaks or jams far too often. I can't tell you how many lamps I've thrown away because the activator either bound up so tightly you can't turn it anymore, or became so loose turning it didn't work the mechanism. A device with a single moving part should have a well-designed part that continues to move appropriately for decades without problem.

    4. Poor usability. The activator device is almost always more complicated or less efficient than it needs to be. So many lamps have knobs that are tiny, thin little sticks, which makes it almost impossible to rotate them. (This is the type that invariably binds up, making the situation worse). You should have nice, big knobs or easy-to-grip dongles on the end to take advantage of applied force and angular rotation - it's much easier to turn a screwdriver than a screw, and easier still to turn a wrench than a screwdriver. Most knobs also only rotate one direction, which means if the knob is positioned on the left side of the lamp for righties or the right side of the lamp for lefties, you either need an awkward reach around or to reposition the lamp to rotate the darn thing - not terrible if you only ever reach in from one position, but difficult if you approach the lamp from different angles (both sides of a desk, say, or if one person in the house is a righty and the other a lefty). The push pins are just as bad: you need your hand on one side of the lamp to turn it on, but your hand has to to to the other side of the lamp to turn it off, and you have to fumble around to figure out which side has the pin sticking out. The beaded draw strings are really lousy about catching and jamming. Compared to another very popular on/off switch -- the common wall-mounted light switch -- all of these are badly inferior. I've never, ever had a light switch fail on me, but lamp switches break all the time. (Even the average power button - press once for on and press again for off - is vastly superior.)

    5. They're unnecessarily loud. Again, compare to a normal wall-mounted light switch which works silently, the average lamp is surprisingly noisy as it clicks or clacks. I've woken up my wife turning off the bedside lamp at night, and there are enough times that my baby -- in another room, behind two closed doors -- wakes up as I turn off the light that I suspect she can hear it. This is *not* an unusually loud lamp; just the normal sudden clacking is enough in a dark and quiet space to startle someone.

    6. Added to the noise is the fact that most lamp shades simply will NOT stay tightened, and also spin and rattle when they inevitably come loose. Being able to change a shade is a valuable option, but I'd say I change one shade a decade. With approximately ten lamps in the house, that means the average lamp shade life span is about a century. Even disregarding that loose math, the default behavior should clearly favor being fixed in place. Much better that it's hard to remove the shade th

    1. Re:What about lamps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you tried touch lamps? We use ones that have a metal base and get brighter with each touch of your finger before switching off. Admittedly getting brighter as you're about to sleep sucks but there is no switch rage

    2. Re:What about lamps? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      A device with a single moving part should have a well-designed part that continues to move appropriately for decades without problem.

      But then you will buy the lamp and not buy it again for a long time. How is the manufacturer going to get the money when you are not replacing the lamp monthly?

      Sadly, this is the goal of a lot of companies - make a product that lasts just long enough for the warranty to expire and the customer will go buy it again. Compare this to the design of old devices - especially ones made in the USSR - the devices are very sturdy, even the cheap tape recorder (where the power amp tube gets used as bias oscillator in record mode instead of a separate tube) is made really well - thick metal etc.

    3. Re:What about lamps? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I agree, touch lamps are kind of nice, and they are an improvement. Of course they're a little mysterious if you don't know it's a touch lamp and you're trying to figure out how to turn one on, but generally fumbling around for where you think the switch *should* be will trigger the lamp.

      I don't think there's too much of a problem having to step through the low-mid-bright stages as you turn it off, as all three-way lamps have the same problem. If I'm going to sleep I just shut my eyes before triggering the lamp and it's less of a problem, though our only touch lamp is in the kid's room, so I may be messing with her a little.

      There is also the occasional problem of accidentally turning on the lamp when you're fumbling around for something else, but it's still far better than the normal fumbling around for a hidden switch.

    4. Re:What about lamps? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I've got to say, if a lamp breaks on me I'm not going to buy a replacement lamp from the same company. Shoddy products with built-in expiration only make a good business model if they're all in on it together - which for all I know they may be.

    5. Re:What about lamps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't a solution rather obvious?

      Just don't buy lamps with any of those problems. Buy the ones without.

      Oh wait, they are $X more expensive...

    6. Re:What about lamps? by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

      You buy a lamp made by company A, it breaks and you buy a new lamp from company B. Meanwhile, somebody else buys a lamp from company B, it breaks and he buys a new lamp from company A.

      If some company produces lamps that are much worse than the competition then they may be featured in some bad reviews resulting in less sales, but as long as the majority of companies make lamps that last about the same it's all OK.

      Another example - currently almost all electronics are made with SMD components, even the devices that are big enough to have a board with trough hole components (ever took apart a new DVD player? there's a lot of empty space in there, you could probably fit a small tube amp in there). SMD components are more difficult to repair than trough hole.

    7. Re:What about lamps? by tylernt · · Score: 1

      Amen. Actually, I consider lamps in general to be like buggy whips -- no house built after Rural Electrification (say, 1939ish) should ever require a lamp. Building a house that needs lamps to light it makes about as much sense as building a house with no plumbing, because buckets work just as well.

      --
      DRM 'manages access' in the same way that a prison 'manages freedom'
    8. Re:What about lamps? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      Touch lamps also rarely get along well with compact fluorescent bulbs, because most of them are built with SCRs and depend upon having a tiny bit of current flowing through a resistive load at all times to keep them powered up. That makes CFLs flicker visibly in a dark room when turned "off", and often causes lamps with them to spontaneously turn on.

      X-10 resistive-load dimming controllers have the exact same problem. Their APPLIANCE controllers have a similar problem unless you open it up and cut the jumper that enables the "turn it off and on twice to turn it on from the local switch" feature. The phenomenon that causes the "off" CFL to flicker makes the circuit think you turned it off and on twice. Sometimes, you can fool it by plugging the lamp into an extension cord that ALSO has a nightlight with 2-watt incandescent bulb plugged in and turned on, but that's an ugly kludge that doesn't always work.

    9. Re:What about lamps? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      > Just don't buy lamps with any of those problems. Buy the ones without.

      Easier said than done. It's not like low-quality CFLs have an "ingredient" list that includes entries like, "electrolytic capacitors made with low-quality electrolyte that are 58% more likely to burst within 18 months than the leading brand!", and plenty of expensive ones use the same crap capacitors and die just as quickly. Reviews don't help much, because a lot of these products are made by the same 2 or 3 factories in China and rebranded by everyone, so not even the company selling them whose name is on the package really, truly knows for sure about the quality of the parts used to make them. Chinese companies in particular are NOTORIOUS for "quality fade", where the first few batches are pristine and high-quality, then they start cutting corners and substituting components until you notice and scream... then they behave for a while, and go right back at it again.

      The truth is, it's damn near impossible to buy consistently high-quality products anymore, because it's impossible for even an astute & motivated consumer to find any meaningful information about the quality of what he's buying. And no guarantee that the exact same brand & model won't be totally different the next time he goes shopping for a replacement.

      Here's an easy challenge, just to show how hard it is: go buy a thirdparty micro-USB charger for a cell phone that implements the official charging standard AND can deliver the full 1.5 (let alone 2.1) amperes such a charger is theoretically supposed to be able to sustain. I guarantee that nearly every one you buy will fry itself if you try to actually draw that much power continuously for more than a few seconds or minutes. Most can sustain 700mA. A few can sustain 1000mA. But nowhere on ANY package will you see something like, "power delivery, 750mA continuous, 1000mA for up to 30 minutes when ambient temperature is below 40C". Going by what's printed on the package, they're all identical. They output 5v with some real (but unknown) upper limit to what they can sustain, and you'll never know what it is until you buy it and destroy it by drawing too much power for too long.

  88. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From his link being in the .uk TLD, I'd assume he's in the UK, where knife law is ridiculously restrictive. But there's any number of small multitools (or plain knives, but I prefer multitools) with non-locking, sub-3" blades, which AIUI are legal to carry in the UK. My personal favorites (CRKT's Zilla tool and SOG's PowerAssist) would sadly be off the table -- one of many reasons I'm glad I don't live there -- but I think SOG's Pocket Powerplier would be OK.

  89. Surprised no one has been sued yet by JDG1980 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Clamshell packaging sucks from the consumer perspective because most of it isn't designed with consumers in mind. It's designed with retailers in mind. Retailers don't care if you cut yourself opening the package, but they are highly paranoid about the possibility of shoplifting (even though a majority of retail theft is internal).

    What surprises me is that there haven't been any large-scale lawsuits over this junk. Fully-sealed clamshell packages deliberately put the end user at a greater risk of cuts (since you need a sharp instrument to open them) without providing any offsetting benefits to the end user. People have gotten themselves on the wrong end of multi-million dollar punitive judgments for much less. A good trial lawyer should have little trouble convincing a jury that a company which deliberately traded off product safety for less shoplifting should be responsible for the human costs of that decision. Especially when everyone on the jury remembers struggling with the damn things themselves.

    Alternatively, the CPSC should mandate that clamshell packages must be able to be opened without the use of a sharp implement.

  90. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    I hear that pocket knifes are illegal in New York City though, that has gotta suck.

    Isn't that the same myopic dystopia in which the government thinks they have the right to stop and physically search anyone and everyone they please?

    All things considered, I would be more surprised if NYC didn't ban anything and everything a citizen could use to protect themselves from the authoritarian regime; despotic leadership tends to be that way.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  91. Re:CFL light bulb by JSBiff · · Score: 1

    The thing is, some of the bulbs actually get bright almost immediately, but unfortunately, it's almost impossible when shopping for them in the store to figure out which are the instant-on ones and which aren't. Some of the instant-ons might be labelled as such (if marketers were smart, they would), but I've gotten some packages which weren't labelled like that, and were still instant-on.

    The thing I absolutely love about CFLs isn't so much lower electric bills (though I like that too), but the fact that I seem to never have to change them. I've been using the same CFLs now for like 4 years.

  92. two words, not one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tin snips.. work perfectly every time, heat seals and all

  93. Have a knife handy as one should anyway. by couchslug · · Score: 1

    I just cut 'em open. I'll take the trade of inconvenience for product protection because I _KNOW_ I should be carrying a knife (or the far more useful multitool) at all times.

    Serrated paring knives work very well. When mine wear a bit, they go from kitchen to "scattered anywhere handy".

    These "Vickies" by the way are terrific utility knives. I even take one to salvage yards to cut radiator hose! They last a LONG time.

    Search for:
    "Victorinox Bulk Pack Paring "Knife 3.25in Blade Black Handle - Victorinox 40600"

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  94. Cheap, easy way to opem clamshell packages by liquidweaver · · Score: 1

    Tinsnips. No, it's not a sexy purpose-built anit-clamshell device, but it might as well be.
    Seriously. $6 for a pair at Walmart, they will last a lifetime of clam shell cutting.

    --
    mov ah, 4ch
    int 21h
  95. Therac-25? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes yes, everyone hates clamshell packaging, but worst design ever? Hardly.

  96. Hermetically sealing a CFL - liability coverage by zman58 · · Score: 1

    CFLs are sealed in the container so you do not contaminate the store when you drop the package.

    If you break a CFL you have a serious environmental problem with toxic mercury vapor. If it is in a hermetically sealed container when it breaks, then you do not have a environmental problem. You really should be careful about where you use these hazardous lighting appliances in your home. Only use them where you are very confident they will not break and introduce toxic mercury vapor into your home--such as in outdoor or garage lighting only.

    I was told by an employee at the big home improvement center that if they break a CFL outside of the packaging they have to call in an EPA approved cleanup service. It is very expensive, costing from several hundred to thousands of dollars to get the mess cleaned up properly--depending on the degree of contamination. No joke.

    1. Re:Hermetically sealing a CFL - liability coverage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mercury is not a vapor at STP. It is only a vapor when you run high voltage current through it in a low-pressure glass envelope. Check the vapor pressure. Or just let a blob of it sit in a petri dish on your desk and wait for it to evaporate. It'll be there forever.

      As soon as the envelope of a fluorescent bulb breaks, you have zero to worry about from the "toxic mercury vapor". CFL or regular fluorescent tube, it doesn't matter they all have mercury.

      Anyone who calls an expensive hazardous waste cleanup over a broken fluorescent bulb is either completely stupid or overly worried about being sued or fined later if they don't.

  97. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got a handy little tool from Think Geek called "The Plastic Surgeon" that works pretty well.

    Did it come in a plastic clamshell package?

    Yes, yes it did.

  98. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by johnny+cashed · · Score: 1
  99. You are exhibiting a very common fallacy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are extrapolating from a highly biased, self-selected minority to the population as a whole

    The assholes you are used to dealing with (customers and retail store owners/employees) are in no way representative of the average decent person.

    Honest people are very unlikely to work retail, and tend to err on the side of being "decent", and not returning something they see as damaged, even in the smallest way.

    This natural, basic human tendency is taken advantage of by most retail owners and employees who routinely try to discourage or disallow returns on the flimsiest excuse.

    1. Re:You are exhibiting a very common fallacy. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      The assholes you are used to dealing with (customers and retail store owners/employees) are in no way representative of the average decent person.

      In my experience, most people who label themselves and their buddies as "average, decent people" while calling a huge portion of the rest of us "assholes", are actually themselves some of the biggest assholes around.

      I should know, because I'm one of them.

  100. Curb Your Enthusiasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  101. Kitchen Ache box cutter not included by epine · · Score: 1

    A set of Kitchen Aid spatulas purchased from Costco clad in double-aught polycarbonate cost me a nice Denby butter dish I had purchased at a good price from an upscale consignment store where most of the drippings are better than my best china. I was working my triceps just pushing the scissors through the Kitchen Ache customer-deterrence Hadrian wall. When the scissors finally lunged into the creeping seam, the package lurched 12" inches across the countertop before my triceps released. Butter dish hit the hard ceramic tile and both halves became an instant butter dish crumble. All I really wanted from the package was the superior tongs, not the excessively canted flippers and spoons.

    The packaging was so excessive it made the Formula 100 baricade-bundle of individually wrapped TP rolls flush red for being underdressed. Bad Costco. Bad Kitchen Aid. Maybe some entrepreneur could recycle the used package clippings into a razor wire that even the coons will size up with props and a splayed-claw ebonic paw gesture.

  102. Re:CFL light bulb by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    If I wasn't at work I would give you links, but youtube is blocked. I'm sure you can find the relevant anti-CFL stuff on youtube & google. It isn't hard. Try "flaws with CFL" or "burning CFL"

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  103. Re:CFL light bulb by firex726 · · Score: 1

    Do you have the Instant-Ons?

    Got a brand and model #?

  104. Re:CFL light bulb by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>> I seem to never have to change them. I've been using the same CFLs now for like 4 years.

    My CFLs burn-out every 6 months and rarely last longer than the "normal" bulbs. Of course I know why: The CFLs used in normal "right side up" lights will last long, but in ceiling lights, which are positioned upside down, the heat becomes trapped in the enclosure & kills the electronics (the caps swell and leak). I suspect the same would happen with LED bulbs. These modern designs aren't good for enclosed or upside-down fixtures... the heat kills them.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  105. Thankfully this is not in EVERY country. by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 1

    Products in Japan tend to come in packaging that is easy to open and close again (for durable goods anyway).

    In fact, I often store some things from Japan in the original packaging because it also makes a convenient case to hold it.

    (Japanese FOOD, on the other hand, tends to come hideously overpackaged in many concentric layers of paper and plastic that all goes to waste.)

  106. Scissors - ultimatley a great design idea by Gimbal · · Score: 1

    n/t

  107. Patience and care by jklovanc · · Score: 1

    There are many tools that can be use to open clam shell packages; knives, scissors, saw , specialty hand tools, specialty electrical tools, etc. So when you buy a pair of scissors in a clam shell you may need to find a knife to open them.

    The main point is that patience and care are needed to open the package safely. I have seen people hack at packages with knives and that causes the blade to slip and cause injury. I have never injured myself opening a sealed clamshell; I am careful.

  108. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by vitaflo · · Score: 1

    There's an even easier tool to use that everyone already has.

    A can opener.

    Makes opening these things quick and easy.

  109. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These modern designs aren't good for enclosed or upside-down fixtures... the heat kills them.

    Then why does the packaging explicitly state that such configurations are ok?

  110. Another great package opening tool by podom · · Score: 1

    I have a pair of these Open-It shears, and they're one of my more frequently used tools. Work great:

    http://www.amazon.com/Zibra-ZPCOPEN-OR-Universal-Package-Opener/dp/B000IHHOVI/ref=sr_1_3?ie=UTF8&qid=1338583772&sr=8-3

    We once bought 30 micro-SD cards for a project at work, which came packaged in annoying, hermetically sealed plastic clamshells. I used our laser cutter to slice around the actual card in each package. Voila!

    --
    We're wanted men. I have the death sentence in 12 systems!
    1. Re:Another great package opening tool by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      I have a Ryobi bandsaw with a custom jig which is up to the most demanding package opening tasks. It also handles less demaning jobs such resawing 4 in thiick oak.

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
  111. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by iter8 · · Score: 1

    I use a chainsaw.

  112. Windows Registry by macraig · · Score: 1

    In the arena of software design, nothing undercuts the Windows Registry as the Worst Idea Ever (for consumers, anyway).

  113. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by hurfy · · Score: 1

    Ok, at least that makes a bit of sense. I was looking at my new Hard Disk packaging wondering WTF just a couple days ago.

    Now why the 'OEM' HD needed to be in a very well sealed very large clamshell capable of standing upright on it's own is the next big question. I miss the old reuseable plastic packages these used to come in, at least this time i wasn't saving the old drive.

    I use EMT style utility scissors capable of cutting thru seatbelts (or metal) to open this crap.

  114. So buy a better lamp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like you're just buying shitty lamps, dude.

    If it's pissing you off that much, go lamp-shopping or ask a decorator. They make a shitload of different kinds of lamps. There's probably no device on earth that industrial designers like to play with so much as the lamp. It's ridiculous.

    Somewhere out there, there's a lamp that meets your requirements. Something with a non-removable, frosted-glass shade it and a fat, quiet push-button on the base to turn it on and off. It may take you all of a weekend to find if you really want one, and from the sound of things, you really ought to before you go postal.

  115. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    That's Cristian Weston Chandler's favorite place to eat, you insensitive clod!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  116. The worst packaging is not clamshell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The worst packaging is the plastic bags that they wrap porn magazines in so you can't see what is inside.

  117. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only tool that works well is a bandsaw. yes, it is a little hard to get through a security checkpoint but it sure works. i guess you could use a scrollsaw in a pinch. btw, the bandsaw didnt come in a clamshell.

  118. Never seen a CFL in a clamshell around here by jonwil · · Score: 1

    All the CFLs I have seen (and bought) come in cardboard boxes.

  119. Useit.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One man's never ending obsession to bring mediocrity back to the web.

  120. car controls by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    in most cars I've seen, windshield wiper is controlled by a stick to the right of the wheel, turn signal by a stick to the left of the wheel. Different things, although I still occasionally hit the wrong one.
    A lot of controls seem to be hybrid - can be turned like a dial (for adjusting), can be pushed like a button (for on/off). Either way, I don't like to fidget with them while driving.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:car controls by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      A lot of controls seem to be hybrid

      That was what I was referring to. Too often I'll hit the turn signal, and the wipers will come on.

      Either way, I don't like to fidget with them while driving.

      That's wise.

  121. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    243 million .. sold .. And there were 34 reports of smoke, and 4 reports of fire

    Even substandardly sealed tanks of hydrogen hydroxide don't have an inflammation rate that high!

  122. Obligatory... by DaneM · · Score: 1

    How many frustrated consumers does it take to change a light bulb, now?

  123. wrap rage at it's best by Alien7 · · Score: 1
  124. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So we'll buy them?

    Actually, my Philips Vision LED explicitly stated it wasn't for enclosed fixtures.

  125. CFL? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

    Just bought 2 boxes of CFL, they were in 100% cardboard, no clamshell, just straight cardboard. In fact it didn't even have tape on it.

  126. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a big scissors shaped pair of tin snips i got from Lowes.

  127. f those packages by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I literally accidentally slit my wrist trying to open one of those dumb packages. Vertically too. Had to go to the er, I was bleeding so bad. F*** those packages. The irony is it was a new buck knife, and i was using the my old one to slice it open

  128. Re:Worst design ever - Office Multifunction Copier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would you scan email? It's already on the computer. And if you're scanning a document in order to email it, didn't the document originate from a computer?

  129. Plastics as packaging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it's not the clamshell that pisses me off so much as the plastic. If you're buying a CFL light bulb to save money on your utility bill then fine but if you think for a second that you're helping the environment then maybe you should take a look at the island made of discarded plastic in the Pacific ocean, one which will grow slightly larger when you throw out that plastic clamshell.

  130. Re:Worst design ever - Office Multifunction Copier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "scan to email" not "scan email". I had to look twice too. I'm not sure why my mind edited the "to" out.

  131. Clamshells are no big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My bandsaw makes short work of plastic packages. Does a number to the user's manual though...

  132. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by dave87656 · · Score: 1

    I agree. But I never thought of this until I saw someone else do it. It works perfectly. Unfortunately, a box cutter is something you don't usually have in your kitchen. I have to go to the basement work room.

  133. about time /. started using pics with captions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like wth is plastic clamshell? why do i have to read 12 nerd comments on unrelated topics to understadnd what the faak clamshell pakcaging is? is it what i think it is? that freakingg hard impossible to tear packaging of SD micro cards etc?

  134. Re:Someone sells a tool to open these things easil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if you're in a pinch, you can use a can opener

  135. Re:CFL light bulb by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

    >>>>These modern designs aren't good for enclosed or upside-down fixtures... the heat kills them.
    >>
    >>Then why does the packaging explicitly state that such configurations are ok?

    They don't. They say the exact-opposite. "Do not use this CFL in enclosed fixtures." -- That's okay but since the EU Parliament and US Congress outlawed the sale of regular bulbs (effective 2014), what are we supposed to use instead? I guess our enclosed fixtures will just have to stand empty w/ no bulbs.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  136. Re:CFL light bulb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >>>>These modern designs aren't good for enclosed or upside-down fixtures... the heat kills them.

    >>

    >>Then why does the packaging explicitly state that such configurations are ok?

    They don't. They say the exact-opposite.

    Yes they do. Last time you claimed this crock, I actually picked up the packaging and read it, and what I saw was that enclosed/upside-down installations are explicitly permitted.

    Now if you'd like to argue that it is all some sort of marketing gimmick, with all sorts of conditions attached (similar to the whole "unlimited" internet bullshit), I'm all ears. But don't spread such easily verifiable lies, it just tarnishes your reputation.