Slashdot Mirror


2013 H-1B Visa Supply Nearly Exhausted

CowboyRobot writes with news on the FY2013 allocation of H-1B visas. From the article: "As of June 1, the government had issued 55,600 standard H-1B visas out of the annual allotment of 65,000, according to United States Immigration and Citizenship Services (USCIS). The feds also issued 18,700 H-1B visas reserved for graduates of advanced degree programs in the U.S., out of 20,000. " CowboyRobot continues, "Last year work visas did not run out until late November, but this year the pool of visas is almost entirely claimed and it's still only June. One interpretation of this is that the tech industry is hiring much more actively than it was a year ago. Some companies, such as Microsoft, have been lobbying to increase the number of available visas (currently limited to 65,000) while others argue that offering visas to foreign workers reduces job prospects for Americans." A bit more from the article: "Industry lobby group Partnership for A New American Economy last month released a study that claims the U.S. will face a shortage of 224,000 tech workers by 2018 unless immigration rules are loosened."

293 of 428 comments (clear)

  1. unsigned short by nattt · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the visa numbers are stored in an unsigned short and can't go above 65535 anyway....

    --
    -- oldthinkers unbellyfeel ingsoc
    1. Re:unsigned short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A few H1B workers would be quick to fix that for you

    2. Re:unsigned short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You assume government contractors are quick, efficient, and most importantly: competent.

    3. Re:unsigned short by kurt555gs · · Score: 1

      Where are mod points when I need them? This is funny.

      --
      * Carthago Delenda Est *
  2. Thank God. by HunsV · · Score: 5, Informative

    H-1B is a scam by which white collar companies (not blue collar, because they aren't cool enough) can fire American workers and then replace them with foreign workers who are so happy to get to the States that they will work for $10,000 less per year. (There are laws against this kind of wage fuckery. They work the same as speed laws in Saudi Arabia: No one cares to obey or enforce them. The "shortage" of workers is a lie manufactured by Oracle, Microsoft, etc. in order to cut costs. Most of the comp sci classes I took were filled to the gills, and the program I got into in college was so impacted that I had to go in on another major and switch after the fact. It's like that in lots of places. Fuck all this H-1B nonsense, and fuck all the liars and misinformed idiots who think we are just gagging for foreign labor. We aren't gagging for foreign labor. Larry Ellison and Bill Gates are gagging for foreign labor because they can be paid less.

    1. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Most of the comp sci classes I took were filled to the gills

      and guess what... 95% of you suck. "Comp sci classes I took" sounds like a real serious education.

      I hire H-1Bs, I hire Americans. Whoever is best for the job.

    2. Re:Thank God. by digitig · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm told (I'm not an expert, so I'm open to correction) that in Switzerland pretty much anybody can get a work permit provided they will be paid above the average rate for the job. That means that if there are skills that cannot be sourced locally then employers have no problems recruiting globally, but they can't use that as a way of bringing in cheap foreign workers. I hope that is true -- it seems like an intelligent system.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    3. Re:Thank God. by zero0ne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This right here would probably solve the issue in one iteration.

      Of course it could also backfire and bring our wages down to the point where they still recruit H-1Bs

    4. Re:Thank God. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      H-1B is a scam by which white collar companies (not blue collar, because they aren't cool enough)

      Jobs that can be outsourced(relatively successful in manufacturing[and if you choose the CNMI you can even use 'made in USA' stickers while paying at roughly Chinese rates!], rather a mixed record in white-collar tech) or done under-the-table with reasonable safety for the people who matter(Gosh, officer, I had no idea that my janitorial contractor's subcontracted cleaning crew might not be 100% on the up-and-up immigration wise... I figured that they were so cheap because they just had a good work ethic...) don't really need H-1Bs...

    5. Re:Thank God. by HunsV · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your response contains a baseless personal attack because you know you're full of shit. If these H1B education visas are sending people to the same schools we go to, then what's the difference? Are 95% of these H1B candidates bad too? Do you think someone who got a degree in the Punjab got a better education, and if so, why do they need to come here for a degree, or to work? Just admit it. You hire whoever does a good enough job for the least amount of money. Can you at least be honest about this? It's generally how business works. I'm faced with the same equation. So is everyone. It's alright to just admit that without fabricating some nonsense about how we don't have enough talent.

    6. Re:Thank God. by rastilin · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm pretty sure that in America the H-1Bs have to be paid the same as a local, except that practically they are often underpaid and if they complain they are shipped out before the matter gets to court. There's no point in having laws if they're never enforced.

      --
      How do you kill that which has no life?
    7. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The H-1B is for individuals at the top of their respective field, and it only accounts for 65,000 out of more than 6 million visas alloted per year. Say what you will about work visas in general, and granted the H-1B lasts longer than most other work visas, but H-1B visas are not where I would begin making cuts! They allow us to sap the smartest minds from other coutries, and use them for our own benefit, to benefit our own industries and own economy.

    8. Re:Thank God. by supertall · · Score: 1

      Awesome. I never have mod points when I really need them.

    9. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't work in HR, but I work in a big tech firm, and my understanding from interviewing candidates is that our company would much rather hire US citizens (at least at the fresh-out-of-college-level). These positions have a fixed starting salary (depending on bachelors/masters/Phd), and sponsoring an employee for an HIB is expensive to the company. We really do have difficulty finding high quality college grads to fill our positions. By the time I see them, they've already made it past the phone-screen, and still a large number don't have the basic knowledge they should have learned in school.

    10. Re:Thank God. by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 1

      I hire H-1Bs, I hire Americans. Whoever is best for the job.

      Yeah... I'll bet...

    11. Re:Thank God. by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      Not at all. They can't compete. A job description can be written in such a way so that the person hired would only be an H-1B visa. Not too mention since they are contract workers there are no benefits to pay.

    12. Re:Thank God. by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There are ways around that. Obviously, a Jr. DBA isn't gonna be paid as much as a Sr. DBA. But who's to know if the guy classified as a Jr. DBA is doing work usually done by a Sr. DBA?

    13. Re:Thank God. by h4rr4r · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That might be what H1B is supposed to be used for, but it is really used to get cheap IT folks. I have had to work with some of these folks and if they work for our customer who hired a contracting firm, they suck. The direct hire ones are fine, but all the ones coming from the usual suspect Indian staffing firms are terrible.

    14. Re:Thank God. by giostickninja · · Score: 1

      Jobs that can be outsourced(relatively successful in manufacturing[and if you choose the CNMI you can even use 'made in USA' stickers while paying at roughly Chinese rates!], rather a mixed record in white-collar tech) or done under-the-table with reasonable safety for the people who matter(Gosh, officer, I had no idea that my janitorial contractor's subcontracted cleaning crew might not be 100% on the up-and-up immigration wise... I figured that they were so cheap because they just had a good work ethic...) don't really need H-1Bs...

      Translates to:

      Jobs that can be outsourced or done under-the-table with reasonable safety for the people who matter don't really need H-1Bs...

      You might want to consider using less parenthetical statements---at least, assuming you want people to actually read and absorb your statements.

    15. Re:Thank God. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most of the comp sci classes I took were filled to the gills

      and guess what... 95% of you suck. "Comp sci classes I took" sounds like a real serious education.

      I hire H-1Bs, I hire Americans. Whoever is best for the job.

      And if 95% of the H1-Bs didn't suck, I wouldn't complain about the program. The stated case for H1-B is to allow highly skilled workers with skills not found in the US to enter and work here. The reality of the situation is that it's a program to drive down prices for tech workers by hiring mostly unskilled workers, all the while treating them as indentured servants.

    16. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "there are no benefits to pay"...of the all the H1B using people I have known, none have been contract workers without benefits.

    17. Re:Thank God. by kav2k · · Score: 2
      As far as I understand it's still subject to quotas and at the very least the employer has the burden to prove they cannot find such an employee in 1) Switzerland, 2) EU/EFTA.

      Quoting:

      A third state national can take a job in Switzerland only if a person cannot be hired from within the Swiss labour market or an EU/Efta state. Employers must show that they made “intensive efforts” to find a Swiss, EU/Efta citizen or any foreign national already in Switzerland with a permit to work. Moreover, employers must show why those with priority who applied were not suitable for the job.

      Fortunately, some professions, like researchers, are exempt from quotas.

      For anyone wishing to dig into details, here's the corresponding legislation (FR, DE or IT only)

    18. Re:Thank God. by clodney · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Just admit it. You hire whoever does a good enough job for the least amount of money. Can you at least be honest about this? It's generally how business works.

      In my experience with several medium to large companies, the mantra is always "get the best person you can". I've never had *any* pressure to settle for the candidate who wants $80K instead of $90K. But the person that wants (and may well deserve) $125K isn't going to fit my budget. HR doesn't get involved as long as the offer I am making is within the salary range for the position, and finance doesn't get involved unless I am clearly blowing my budget - but no one is going after me because I budgeted the position at $88K and spent $90K. A bigger issue for me is that I don't want to bring in somebody making $120K if the average salary is $90K, because unless it is clear to everybody that the person is really worth the extra bump, I am creating an equity issue that leads to a bunch of unhappy people down the road.

      I have no opinion about the quality of H-1B visas versus local candidates. To get hired they have to be good enough to make up for any language difficulties, so the bar may be a little higher overall. But I will say that someone who has the ambition and drive to leave their home country and culture and come to the US has already shown more ambition and willingness to take a risk than most local candidates. Not a knock on the locals, just a recognition that the immigrants are a self selected pool that have already demonstrated willingness to go to some lengths for their career.

    19. Re:Thank God. by jsepeta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's an amazing amount of prejudice in HR, where they believe that Indian workers are smarter and work harder than American citizens. I've met a couple of examples that prove that such thoughts are unwarranted. Sometimes an American can do a better job, even without a degree from Hyderabad.

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
    20. Re:Thank God. by bjwest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      and guess what... 95% of you suck. ...

      This is because people think they know computers because they can make their way around a "pointy-clicky" interface and know how to google things. High School graduation and/or collage enrolment day comes around and they say to themselves, "Hey, I bet I could make a mint in computer science. I think I'll major in that." They then, proceed to "google" and cheat their way though the classes, not really understanding what they're being taught.

      Computer science, like all the sciences, is not something you can learn on a whim just because you want to. In order to be proficient at it, you need the skills to do so, and those are not something you can learn, they are built up with years of practice and experience. By the time collage rolls around, you either have them or you don't. It's too late to acquire them now. You can, however, put off collage and spend the next five to ten years acquiring them, then get your CS degree and be good at your job. Or, you know, choose a major you have the skills for.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    21. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You mean, whoever is cheapest for the job.

      You'd be paying much hire prices for the employees you get if it weren't artificially lowered by bringing in H1-Bs. Supply and demand. You can say "well, that's just how it goes for everyone", but that's not true. My company can bring people in from anywhere in the world (or farm the work out offshore to anyone in the world). *I*, however, have to pay local prices. I can't work cheaper, because I have to pay big-city rent and big-city groceries. I can't possibly compete with some guy overseas who is the king of his neighborhood, because he has a 1994 Toyota and running hot water in his dusty house and pays a whopping $100/mo rent.

    22. Re:Thank God. by anerki · · Score: 1

      Basically in Europe all countries allow residents of all other European countries to work in their country. Taxing to be done dependent on where you live, not where you work.

      Of course, countries with the highest living standard (Sweden, Norway, etc.) will make it a bit harder to do so, but there's no law stopping them fro making it more difficult. Though European law will make sure they don't malpractice in that area, which wouldn't make any sense imo.

      Regardless, the whole working visa etc. (and then in particular limiting it by a fixed number wtf US l2p) is not an issue for Europeans working in Europe.

      Go outside Europe, that's another ballgame :) (but just to point out, it's not just Switzerland)

      --
      Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
    23. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You do realize you just explained why the process drives down wages right? Your HR department might not fight with you over the differences in 80 to 90k but over time as the average is lowered, 110 becomes the new 120.

    24. Re:Thank God. by clodney · · Score: 2

      Increasing the size of the labor pool does drive down wages, no doubt about it. But I was addressing the perception that at the point of hire all that matters is the price tag, and not the applicant. In my experience it is the opposite - get the best candidate you can, even if you have to spend more than planned.

      The company I work at has skipped annual raises twice now since the great recession. They don't ask people to taken an explicit pay cut, but by eliminating raises they have effectively done the same thing. On a personal level I don't like it, but it is one of the only ways that companies have to address their labor costs, because if you do push through pay cuts all the top talent will head for the door. This is the corporate equivalent of inflation - fix wages and let everything else rise, so wages take a lesser bite.

    25. Re:Thank God. by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      I hire H-1Bs, I hire Americans.

      But I bet you get the H-!B's a lot cheaper, don't you?

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    26. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      We have a small number of H-1B's and they're totally able to compete. Large Big Box Indian Body Shop brings them over, most are frauds and don't know squat. However, for the few that are the real deal, they quickly realize that they can earn 30, 40 or 50k more by taking their talents elsewhere. I've gotten some of my best developers by taking on their H-1's when they finally clued into the assraping they're getting from the big boys.

      L-1's are the real enemy. They are typically brought over on a lower than industry average salary, but are locked into a 2-3 year deal where the only move they can make away from Large Big Box Indian Body Shop is to go back to India (or their home country). L-1's == institutionalized indentured servitude.

      In summary, H-1's do allow for competition, L-1's do not.

    27. Re:Thank God. by bobthecow · · Score: 1

      Last week I found a notice posted that my employer is bringing in an H-1B for $115K per year for a three year contract. I think that's significantly more than most of the 10+ year employees on my floor make.

      So I sent a question to the floor director asking what skills are needed that we can't fill from the local resource pool at that salary.

      Crickets.

      Imagine that.

    28. Re:Thank God. by crazyjj · · Score: 4, Informative

      A bigger issue for me is that I don't want to bring in somebody making $120K if the average salary is $90K

      And the big problem with H1B visas is that they artificially DRIVE DOWN the average salary (much as illegal workers do too).

      I'll give you a very concrete example. When I was in college, I used to work farm labor during the summers. This was before the glut of illegals started coming up heavily in the area. At that time, farm labor paid a very respectable $7 an hour (one of the best local salaries an unskilled worker could get). Just a few years later, I started to see more and more illegals working those same fields I had. I was talking to an old friend from the area and asked him if he was still working during the summers. He told me that the standard salary had dropped to $4-$5 an hour for the same work we used to do for $7. The good jobs disappeared because the greedy piece-of-shit farmers in the area knew they could hire illegals that cheap easily (and make no mistake about it, the "noble" American farmer is one of the greediest pieces of shit you will ever encounter in your life). And I bet those same farmers would have raised hell if there had been a crackdown on illegals, complaining to the government that they "just couldn't find workers" (at $4-$5 and hour, of course).

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    29. Re:Thank God. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's an interesting phenomenon.. I remember one job I had where the owner (a limousine liberal type) was wetting her panties over our new Indian hire. She went on and on about how Indians are so much smarter and more cultured than Americans, and even made a few jabs at me during that time. So anyway, we give the guy a simple task -- update a report to round down the number of minutes billed to the customer. I didn't hear from him for 2 days, and he finally came to ask me how to round down to the integer value. Yeah, that'd be the 'floor' function, or just cast to an integer..

      I'm sure there are plenty of smart Indians, but I don't think they're the ones coming over on the H1-B visas.

    30. Re:Thank God. by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      provided they will be paid above the average rate for the job

      Good luck getting that clause into any American H1B reform. Our government is a corporate subsidiary here. And even if you could get it in, you can bet they would just find a way to lower the "average pay rate" until it was meaningless.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    31. Re:Thank God. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      So, you know none of them then?

    32. Re:Thank God. by gorzek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I used to feel this way, too. That is, until I tried to go about filling some vacant developer positions.

      The company I work for is located near New York City, so there's presumably a big field of qualified applicants within a 50-100 mile radius, right?

      Wrong.

      We got a lot of resumes, all right. We weren't even against hiring someone straight out of college, if they were competent and willing to learn. But what I noticed was that the vast majority of resumes were from immigrants, primarily from China and India, though there were a few other countries in the mix. Native-born Americans just don't seem all that interested in writing software. I admit the stuff I work on isn't sexy--it's healthcare software, not something sold to home users. Even so, you'd think more people would be interested in a steady job in a growth field, yet almost all the interest is from people who emigrated here. We don't go out of our way to give jobs to immigrants, we treat all applicants equally and give them a fair shake based on their experience, how they interview, and how they code.

      I don't know, maybe all the white guys (let's face it, that's what we're really talking about) only want to work on video games or something.

      I did look at some degree statistics recently and saw that computer science degrees (and engineering degrees in general) are quite a small slice of the overall college education pie. You know what most people are going to college for now? Business and law. Everyone wants to either be a CEO or a lawyer.

      Anyway, I wish H1Bs weren't necessary, but from what I've seen we really do have a shortage of qualified computer science graduates. What I assume happened is that the dotcom crash put an entire generation off of pursuing CS. The only people going into it now are those with a passion for it, and that's apparently not enough to meet the demand.

    33. Re:Thank God. by Thud457 · · Score: 2

      Heckuva job, job creators.
      Would you like some more money or special dispensations?

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    34. Re:Thank God. by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      A job description can be written in such a way so that the person hired would only be an H-1B visa.

      That's what a lot of ignorant people don't understand. They go to the job sites, and see all these postings and think "Wow, there are plenty of jobs out there." What they don't realize is that only a tiny fraction of these postings are actually REAL. With most postings, they already have someone (or, in the case of H1B's, some GROUP) in mind. They're just posting it as a formality. That's why you see so many postings with very specific, sometimes outright bizarre, requirements. These postings are nothing more than outright fraud, IMHO, defrauding a lot of innocent job hunters of time better spent doing ANYTHING else.

      1) Post a job that only an H1B could or would take
      2) Get no responses from American workers, or weed them all out as "unqualified"
      3) Run to Congress, crying about how you can't get American workers
      4) Get more H1B visas
      5) Profit!

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    35. Re:Thank God. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

      Except for the gated communities.

    36. Re:Thank God. by bjwest · · Score: 1

      This is like saying to someone from a different region than you, I'm not going to listen to what you have to say, no matter how relevant or true, because you don't know how to pronounce the words correctly.

      I'm not writing a dissertation or article here, so won't spend an great deal of time proofreading it. You know what I'm saying even though there may be a misspelled word here and there.

      Read it, or don't. Makes no fuck to me. Just don't proofread it and tell me what I did wrong unless I ask. Save that for my teachers, professors and/or publisher.

      --

      --- Keep the choice with the user..
    37. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I too used to be fooled by this prejudice. But after working for awhile in the industry, you learn that H-1B's are people just like anyone else; you have your rock stars and then you have your idiots.

    38. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Interesting. I had exactly the opposite experience.

      Back in 2008, I worked for a major German firm with offices in the US. The firm in question demanded that I offshore almost three quarters of a million dollars worth of technical work from US resources to a shop in southeast Asia that would do the work for low five figures. I objected, as this was both exploitative to the Asian workers, and be bad for our local economy. I was brought into meetings where it was explained that the company in question was actually a humanitarian agency (really), that this would be great for my project numbers, and that it would be a big "win" for me personally. I still objected, on the basis that I would rather employ Americans locally. Better, I would get the project completed with resources that I would get to manage directly, rather than a team I'd only know via an OC window, teleconference chats, and a series of emails.

      The response at that point was simple: "Either bring on the Asian team, or find another job."

      I brought on the team from Asia and inished the project ahead of schedule and under budget. I got a huge slap in the back for saving the company money, and was told I was "going places."

      They were right: I responded by turning in my notice. Somehow, the firm seemed surprised.

      I now focus on working on projects that work primarily with on-shore assets. It's hard as hell to maintain, but at least I can look at myself in the mirror.

    39. Re:Thank God. by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Generalizations are always unfair to some individuals but generally the immigrant coders I have met were better than US coders at three things. Lying on resumes, exaggerating on resumes and speaking business lingo that makes them sound better to people who don't know any better.

      Of course, there are really great and really awful workers in every profession on both sides of the pond.

    40. Re:Thank God. by seldolivaw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Resurrecting this long-dormant account to respond to this trolling:

      Firstly, speaking as an H-1B holder, the law *requires* that H-1B workers are paid the average salary or better for their job title in their location -- e.g. an H-1B worker hired as a "junior software engineer" in San Francisco cannot be paid less than $90,000. It is therefore mathematically impossible for H-1B workers to lower the average wage paid to tech workers. If you're curious about what H-1B wages are like near you, you can look them up here: http://www.flcdatacenter.com/

      Secondly, speaking as a co-founder of a startup, I can assure you that the skills gap is extremely real. Merely having a CS degree does not impart you with some magical ability to write quality software. The world is full of really terrible coders, and almost no good ones. It is extremely hard to hire right now.

    41. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work in IT for a large American corporation (almost Fortune 100) and have therefore learned to understand the Indian accent pretty well.

      A good number of the Indian "consultants" aren't "highly skilled consultants" but rather "bodies-for-hire" who perform fairly low skilled tasks like running QA scripts and doing support.

      There are some who are very knowledgeable about the technology - usually Microsoft tech - but probably half of the positions could be done by someone with some basic Microsoft knowledge and an associates degree.

      To me, the entire IT H1-B program is a fraud and a sham, and it should be abolished. I know skilled IT people who have been looking for work for over a year. Don't tell me the people aren't available; they're just not available at the price the employers want to pay.

    42. Re:Thank God. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      But who's to know if the guy classified as a Jr. DBA is doing work usually done by a Sr. DBA?
      You have identified another form of wage rot. Let's say you have a Senior DBA who is making near the top of the pay range Senior DBAs and he/she is doing a good job and deserves a raise. Well, HR won't let you give them a raise because the Senior DBA salary range is defined as one standard deviation from X. So what happens? Well, you give them a title change to DBA Manager. Who do they manage? Nobody. What type of work do they do? Senior DBA work. What salary level are they in? Manager. What happened to the Senior DBA salary range? It went down because the average was lowered when this guy who is still doing Senior DBA work got his title changed to Manager.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    43. Re:Thank God. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2

      Law is about BOTH the letter and the law and enforcement.

    44. Re:Thank God. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      Corporate propaganda award for the day goes to....

    45. Re:Thank God. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If you need a foreign expert - pay above average of all DBA-style jobs; if you just need a junior one - hire locally.
      DBA, Developer, IT are all commodity jobs. They do not require specific expertise. If you are not able to find local labor, it is because you are not paying enough.H1B is for specialized fields that you just can't get anybody already in the U.S. to fill. We're talking limited pool worldwide: PhD level research type people. The type of people that we brought in in the 1970s. There is probably a country wide need for perhaps 500 of these type of people per year and most of these people have the means to immigrate on their own if they so desired.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    46. Re:Thank God. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      On behalf of all H1B visa holders, I'd like to say the following:

      Sir, they're not hiring me only because they can afford to pay me less, they're hiring me because I do a better job, for less money and you can't compete with me.

      You can't compete with me because I have *serious* incentive to succeed - I've got family overseas who are not as fortunate as yours. I have the kind of drive to succeed that only people who need to survive have, not the "Oh my gosh, I'm going to see the Knicks" drive. So I'll leave you in the dust, if we were to compete.

      While you were playing Call of Duty on your XBOX, I was taking Calculus 1 as part of my curriculum in *high school*. By the time I graduated from high school, I already studied Finite Math, Linear Algebra, Calculus 1 and some Calculus 2. That's in between the 15 other subjects I had every year since I was 12. You can probably realize how "difficult" college in the US seemed to me.

      I went to the same school as you did, but I didn't get the same education. I got a _better_ education. While you were struggling with determinants, I was reading books *outside* the curriculum, to further my domain-specific knowledge. By the time I graduated from college, I had 4 summer internships.

      In fact, even my English is better than yours. I studied the English _grammar_ since I was 8 and I challenge you to find a grammatical mistake in my comment. I have a slight accent, but I can deliver my thoughts correctly and coherently, and that'll always prevail over your opinionated, arrogant delivery method you used above. Initially, when I came to the US, I wasn't aware of all the slang used around me, but I picked it up fairly quickly. That's how people learn and adapt, and because of my adaptability, I'm more competitive than you.

      While we're on the language topic, can you at least type one sentence in any of the other 3 languages I speak? For your own sake, I hope you can, because at an international corporation, I'll be able to interact with clients and users in their native language, while you're looking up "How are you?" in your pocket dictionary. Why would they hire you? Just because you know some English slang? I have already picked it up. You ain't got nothin' on me, pal.

      You were born in the US, I was born overseas. Neither of us was given a choice, but you got lucky (that perception may vary). Why do you feel entitled to the jobs in the US? Your laws allow me to compete and they're there for a reason - to light some fire under your behind. And make no mistake - I packed both the gasoline and the matches.

      Clearly, you'd prefer to be paid 150k and do no work. Who wouldn't? But it doesn't work like that. So if you don't like the laws, move to a different country - i'll be happy to show you how. You may need to start adapting though.

      And finally, I'm inherently not racist. I come from a country where everyone has the same skin color. You may think that might make me racist, but I don't have the same preconceptions as you do. The first time I saw a black person, I was genuinely curious to see what differences and similarities we have, the same way you see something new and you're curious about it. I realize everyone is a human being and I treat them as my equals. I see how they're different and I respect that. The first time I saw a gay person, I noticed they behave a bit differently, but I respect their choice. I treat you as my equal too, even though you've offended me and everyone who's like me.

      I respect you as my competitor and I see your dissatisfaction as a way to compete with me, whether you're doing it consciously or not. If enough people complain, the laws will be changed, and I won't be allowed to be part of the game. Then, you'll get your 150k to sit on a couch and watching TV all day long, for a short period of time, until your economy collapses while you're superseded by other countries. And it all starts with you, the person who can't compete and makes noise.

      So that's what I bring to the table. What did you bring?

    47. Re:Thank God. by Ryanrule · · Score: 2

      The indian staffing firms are just extensions of their class system.

    48. Re:Thank God. by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Various job sites (Monster, CareerBuilder, a few others), for several weeks.

    49. Re:Thank God. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No you didn't. You just said that you would not hire the US worker that is asking for the fair $120k if you could underpay an H-1B by $30k. You didn't say that you wouldn't behave unethically. You just said that your price to behave unethically is more than $2000.

    50. Re:Thank God. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      But I will say that someone who has the ambition and drive to leave their home country and culture and come to the US has already shown more ambition and willingness to take a risk than most local candidates. Not a knock on the locals, just a recognition that the immigrants are a self selected pool that have already demonstrated willingness to go to some lengths for their career.

      The fact that you think this way and would even consider it in hiring places you squarely into the realm of evil.

    51. Re:Thank God. by ogdenk · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of American IT monkeys and coders. There's a huge mass of them still unemployed. And a huge mass of them who just plain switched careers because we're sick of the bullshit and tired of being treated like burnable disposable commodities that are an unfortunate necessary evil (and often accused of not generating revenue). In general I've noticed secretaries tend to be genuinely valued more than life long IT experience and talent. So yeah..... not in IT anymore.

    52. Re:Thank God. by Hodr · · Score: 1

      I think what you are describing can more accurately be referred to as aptitude.

      The fact is, you really can teach a good percentage of the population the principles of CS.

      Getting them to apply what they learned correctly, to problem solve, and to grow their expertise, and to not get bored while doing so is the trick.

    53. Re:Thank God. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. The Industry group that the summary quotes admits that the H-1B visas are a scam. It says there will be a shortage by 2018. That is 5 years away. For the kind of work that these H-1B workers will be doing, every last one of those people could be trained locally.

    54. Re:Thank God. by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Actually it's not just IT folks, it's lots of professions. I just looked at the E-File data from the Dept. of Labor from 2007. That was easy and "at hand" but there's other positions out there being hired on as H1-B

      Kindergarten Teacher
      Associate Director - Financial Analyst
      Bankruptcy Auditor
      Copy Writer
      Internal Medicine Physician
      Lecturer

      And others.

      So while a lot of the positions asking for H1-B candidates are IT related there's still a lot that I can't figure out why they can't find a local candidate. Also consider that this is before the recession hit for Visas for 2007 requested in 2006. I'm going to look around and see if I can find more current data but again, the H1-B Visa issue isn't just about IT.

      Also with your comment

      usual suspect Indian staffing firms

      I'm working with a client right now who showed a "Right Shore" provider the door. Are we having problems finding people? No. Do we need H1-B Visas to supply staff? No.

      Net, Net this whole damn H1-B mess has been set up due to political arm-twisting to introduce cheap labor not only into IT but into all high value positions in the US.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    55. Re:Thank God. by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      What you are talking about is different from H1B because you are talking about "out sourcing" which is completely different.

      Also, I see that many people do not look at the big picture before making a complaint. The total of H1B workers in the country is fluctuated but should be less than 400k (roughly around 360k~380k). If you are looking at the number with the total number of skilled workers in the U.S., the number is quite small. However, there are people who look at the circumstance from a different point of view. Even though the view is valid at the angle they are looking at, it could be invalid from the other angle. These people will not seek to understand the whole picture and that cause more and more hatred toward the H1B program.

    56. Re:Thank God. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Not to mention its the classic self fulfilling prophecy: The POTUS and congress say "Americans need education and tech jobs will save us!" so Americans actually go into these fields...only to see they are supposed to "compete" with someone who paid less than $10k for THEIR degree while they pay several times that, so they don't go for tech degrees and these fortune 100 companies scream "We can't get any people!" (translation...We can't get any people who will work like a dog for scraps!) and the cycle continues to get worse.

      Many of the guys I know have bailed out of tech completely simply because corps are following "How NOT to hire an American" as a how to guide and if they DO manage to get the job they are being expected to work 24/7/365 for frankly pathetic pay and the knowledge the corp will outsource them at the very first opportunity they get.

      Honestly folks, give you people a SINGLE REASON why they should go into tech and IT, just one. there is ZERO loyalty, the pay is shit, the hours awful, and the corps as with TFA will fuck you over the first chance they get because they can treat Habib like a dog and pay him a good 20% less than you can live on thanks to your student loans. the first thing I told my oldest is DO NOT go into anything tech related and I was damned happy when i found out he wanted to be a doctor.

      Lets face it folks as we saw a few weeks back with the article on why so few are going into IT, its because the corps are fucking the tech sector raw with bullshit like this. And despite what the globalists say here it totally is fucking over our country because these indian workers will go home and build the startups of tomorrow that will come up with the next big thing, while our tech and sciences are simply gutted. this destroys the normal give and take of supply and demand because otherwise the corps would be forced to treat workers less shitty and raise wages to get more people to take these roles being filled by H1-Bs, but because they can fuck over Americans AND treat Habib like dogshit the whole thing gets horribly tilted. When the whole thing falls down the corps will simply walk away, its the US citizens that will be left with the high unemployment, lack of Americans able to fill these roles, and debt.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    57. Re:Thank God. by Rasperin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What do we bring to the table? Creativity, when you were studying all those books, you were taught to think inside a tiny box and asking you to break out of that box is like begging a greedy man to spare a penny. No matter how many times we go over a creative solution you keep referencing bad design patterns, your code uses a ton of a nested for loops, and is hard for everyone else to understand. You think every problem can be solved by using 1 + 1 = 2. However, while a logical pattern can be found, a GOF pattern doesn't have to be used; if a pattern is used there's a good chance a solution has already been created. Why not use that solution? Why must you constantly recreate the wheel, is because you still have your head stuck in those math books instead of staying up to date with your practice?

      Sweeping generalization, I spent 3 months in Hyderabad training a team, then another 9 months working with said team back home. It was one of the most painful experiences of my life, the concept of learning on the job and thinking outside of the box seemed so far away from these guys. However, by what you listed above, I don't believe you are an indian, I'd go with asain. Most of the indian's (H1B or not) are also very lazy, not all, just most. You talk about strive, which makes me think you are part of an east asain country. In which case I say fair game and learn how to think outside of the box.

      By the way, I graduated High School with an extremely low gpa (barely graduating), dropped out of college, missed only one question on the SAT, scored over 100 on the AMC, speak fluent Japanese, English, and conversational french. To graduate high school in the US you are required to take a foreign language (not claiming that would make you fluent), arts class, and are asked to think in more than a logical structure. It's part of why we (in the US) are complaining about No Child Left Behind. It focuses on standardized tests, I'd rather solve a word problem which makes me think how to solve it and gives reality to it, than have to just solve a problem laid out before me.

      We emphasize every kid is different here, then every kid is the same to be taught the same way. It really doesn't work that way, and it's what brings the uniqueness of an American to the problem. While coding may be repetition, how to approach a problem should be thought out.

      Lastly, communication is key, while you may have the language down, if people can't understand you then you might as well be dead wood for anything beyond code monkey. I've met a lot of H1B visas that I couldn't understand for the life of me. Understand this is after living in India, living in Tokyo, living in the Netherlands. This is our problem with you guys, but as all Americans don't fit your case, neither does all H1B visas meet my above case. I've met some wonderful H1B visas that are simply amazing at coding. Far better than I will ever be, and to them I say "great job", but they also usually make more than I do so your point of being better for less doesn't really hold water. Or maybe it does, just not in my own anecdotal (or the stereotypical) background.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    58. Re:Thank God. by Bengie · · Score: 1

      I could care less where you come from, I welcome all good-willed hard workers with open arms. Welcome to the USA.

    59. Re:Thank God. by bware · · Score: 1

      You know what most people are going to college for now? Business and law. Everyone wants to either be a CEO or a lawyer.

      Because that's where the money is, obviously. Who gets paid, and who doesn't lose their job in a downturn? Bankers and lawyers and CEOs. Who brings in foreign workers from low-income countries to perform high-stress, relatively low-paying work, which might be outsourced at any moment to that H-1B colleague when he/she goes back home? Software and high-tech companies (cough *HP lays off 37000* cough).

      Students, especially the students you want, aren't dumb and ignorant.

      we really do have a shortage of qualified computer science graduates.

      (finishing the implicit assumption in that statement) "At that price."

      The only people going into it now are those with a passion for it

      That's who should be going into it. [1]

      and that's apparently not enough to meet the demand.

      "At that price."

      In the supply-and-demand model of economics, when no one wants the product you are offering (a job), it means that the price isn't right (salary). You're getting the product you are paying for. Want better workers? Offer more money.

      People respond to incentives.

      [1] in a perfect world. Obviously there's some price point at which higher wages will induce people not otherwise interested in the field into doing it anyway. Combined with the hysteresis of the time it takes to learn the field, and the time it takes for wages to rise enough to attract people into the field.

    60. Re:Thank God. by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      Of course it can. You just hire senior software engineers and give them the title of junior software engineer. You then opt not to hire senior software engineers at a hire rate and you have just lowered the average wage paid to tech workers. I would think that as someone who was the co-founder of a startup, and the holder of an H-1B visa because your better than your American counterparts, you could have figured out that on your own.

    61. Re:Thank God. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      Your response contains a baseless personal attack because you know you're full of shit.

      Pot/kettle analogy

      If these H1B education visas are sending people to the same schools we go to, then what's the difference?

      It's quite simple:

      Are 95% of these H1B candidates bad too?

      Nope.

      Do you think someone who got a degree in the Punjab got a better education,

      Not necessarily.

      and if so, why do they need to come here for a degree, or to work?

      It has nothing to do with "need." It has to do with desire. That Indian wants to work his ass off to build something for himself, and will jump through any hoops to get it. The American is (on average) a spoiled little shit, who feels he's entitled to the life of a wealthy man just because he happens to have been born in America.

      No, asshole: just being born here doesn't guarantee you a fucking thing. Life is a competition. Work to win, or succeed at failing; it's your choice. If you won't compete then prepare to be beaten by the hordes of immigrants who will.

    62. Re:Thank God. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      What kind of pay were you offering? That might be your problem. I know tons of talented American coders, but if you want to entice someone to fill a position, you have to make it worth leaving their current job (if they have one), or hiring a college grad at a decent wage.

    63. Re:Thank God. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The "shortage" of workers is a lie manufactured by Oracle, Microsoft, etc.

      No, just a redefinition of terms. By "shortage" they mean "nobody is willing to work fo rthe shit salaries we're offering."

    64. Re:Thank God. by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 1

      As a software guy I would never work in NY.. the cost of living is too expensive compared to where I am (Seattle) and the pay is not better,does not compensate, etc. There is no economic incentive to work in NY when I can make more in Seattle.

      --
      - d
    65. Re:Thank God. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      The good jobs disappeared because the greedy piece-of-shit farmers in the area

      Yeah, it's ALL because of the farmers. Every bit of it. The inflation, skyrocketing costs, etc. ALL their fault.

      And ALL of them are driving around in Hummers and F350s with 96" mudders and 5000W stereo systems, I'm quite certain. EVERY ONE of those asshole, EVIL farmers. How dare those fuckers have the gall to take time out of their lives to put crops in the ground to feed YOU.

    66. Re:Thank God. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      I don't know any programmers who use those. Try LinkedIn, Indeed, and Dice.

    67. Re:Thank God. by shiftless · · Score: 1

      The fact that you think the way you do puts you squarely in the realm of evil, on the grounds that stupidity is evil.

      You aren't entitled to a fucking thing, mister.

    68. Re:Thank God. by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      And the big problem with H1B visas is that they artificially DRIVE DOWN the average salary (much as illegal workers do too).

      "Artificially"? And putting up barriers to the free movement of labor is "natural"?

      I'll give you a very concrete example. When I was in college, I used to work farm labor during the summers. This was before the glut of illegals started ....

      We're not talking about illegal farm labor. We're talking about legal skilled white collar workers on H1B visas.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    69. Re:Thank God. by gorzek · · Score: 1

      I don't believe we listed a pay range--stuff like that is always negotiable.

    70. Re:Thank God. by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      The H-1B is for individuals at the top of their respective field, and it only accounts for 65,000 out of more than 6 million visas alloted per year.

      No, the immigrant E-1 Employment First Preference visa is for individuals at the top of their fields (the three subcategories include: [1] "persons with extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics" who must "must have extensive documentation showing sustained national or international acclaim and recognition in their fields of expertise", [2] "Outstanding professors and researchers with at least three years experience in teaching or research, who are recognized internationally", and [3] "Multinational managers or executives who have been employed for at least one of the three preceding years by the overseas affiliate, parent, subsidiary, or branch of the U.S. employer."; source)

      The H-1B is for "Persons in Specialty Occupations which requires the theoretical and practical application of a body of highly specialized knowledge requiring completion of a specific course of higher education", not "people at the top of their fields". (Well, there are also H-1B subcategories for fashion models, and for Department of Defense Cooperative Research and Development projects or Co-production projects; source and source.)

      Say what you will about work visas in general, and granted the H-1B lasts longer than most other work visas, but H-1B visas are not where I would begin making cuts! They allow us to sap the smartest minds from other coutries, and use them for our own benefit, to benefit our own industries and own economy.

      In general, snapping up the best minds is the purpose of the E-1 and, to a lesser extent, E-2 immigrant visas, not the H-1B. The H-1B is more about getting human special-purpose parts for industrial machines, not the "brightest minds".

    71. Re:Thank God. by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      And ALL of them are driving around in Hummers and F350s with 96" mudders and 5000W stereo systems,

      Actually, that pretty accurately describes most of the farmers I worked for. Of course, they would plead poverty if you asked them (bitching is what they did best). But they were pretty well off. And these were mostly low-volume farmers too. One of my friends was the son of a farmer, and his dad gave him about 10 acres to farm one summer (tobacco). In that time he made enough money to buy a brand new truck, with cash. I imagine that there are plenty of midwestern large-scale farmers who are millionaires (not that they would ever admit it when Farm Aid comes to town, of course).

      How dare those fuckers have the gall to take time out of their lives to put crops in the ground to feed YOU.

      Yeah, well most of the farmers I knew were only interested in feeding their pockets. And most of the crops grown were exported and heavily subsidized by taxpayers. So they weren't feeding me shit.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    72. Re:Thank God. by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      You just said that you would not hire the US worker that is asking for the fair $120k if you could underpay an H-1B by $30k.

      No, he said he wouldn't hire anyone at $120k because it doesn't fit his budget. That is to say, if there were no H-1Bs he still wouldn't hire an American at $120k because he can't afford it.

    73. Re:Thank God. by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      if you HAVE to hire someone, you have to hire them. if you can't find them at your price, you find them at their price.

      (or you just moan that you pay a 'competitive' salary and can't find anyone)

    74. Re:Thank God. by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      Hm.. Well if you want to hire Americans and don't mind having them relocate from the midwest, I know a fair number of good devs here that might be willing to relocate if the pay is right and the working conditions are bearable. What skill sets are you looking for?

    75. Re:Thank God. by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      For $90k I can find pretty much anyone to do any job, US or foreign.

    76. Re:Thank God. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      People who are gainfully employed probably aren't going to look at a job posting unless it pays 10-15% more than they are used to making. Many job postings these days don't even display a price range, so a lot of those are just going to get ignored except for people who are really desperate for work.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    77. Re:Thank God. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      an H-1B worker hired as a "junior software engineer" in San Francisco cannot be paid less than $90,000.
      But a Senior Software Engineer level person can be hired on as a "junior software engineer" for $90,000 and put a person with the title "senior software engineer" out of work.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    78. Re:Thank God. by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      ooooo, velvet rope....

    79. Re:Thank God. by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      Our laws are our biggest problem. The US allows foreign people to come here and get jobs, an education, etc. Can the same be said of other countries? If the US applied the foreign country's laws to the foreign people from that country, things might be different. For example: Some countries do not allow foreigners to buy ocean front property. Would you come to the US if you were told that you cannot buy a place near the ocean? Or that you could only buy a place in this area?

      And sorry to say but poor people do not travel around the world to go to school or to get a job. Moving to a country right next door, totally doable. But traveling across an ocean or two? No. Your claim that your family is less fortunate is BS. Out of the 108 foreign grad students (both masters and Ph D) who I have talked to where I work, the lowest family income was a little over $200,000 USD. The same answer was said over and over. The poor people do not get to travel.

    80. Re:Thank God. by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      Don't bet on the employers of manual labor not doing the same thing. The link below is an article regarding the hiring of 254 foreign workers for forestry work. The company contracted to do the work advertised the positions in tiny, out-of-the-way newspapers in California and Washington state. even so, 146 US workers applied, but none were offered a job. http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2011/10/federal_stimulus_money_for_ore.html

    81. Re:Thank God. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      "Industry lobby group Partnership for A New American Economy last month released a study that claims the U.S. will face a shortage of 224,000 tech workers by 2018 unless immigration rules are loosened."

      So the US is under-educating 224,000 students. There is no industry training set up to get Americans employed (they all want 10 years experience with Windows 8, and for some reason, can't fill the job, but won't hire unqualified people into lesser roles with development plans to get them where they need to be in 5 years).

      The "fix" is for the industry to create a union for the workers and steer them into it. Then, let the union work out professional development plans that fit the needs of the industry. The companies have had 50+ years to do it and never have. So it's up to the workers, but the tragedy of the commons has the workers more at each other's throats than working together to solve the problem the companies refuse to. There are enough americans to fill those 224,000 jobs. The pro-H1-B companies want to fill them with people trained elsewhere.

    82. Re:Thank God. by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but if nobody knows up-front if you're willing to negotiate from 40 up to 60 or 110 up to 130, they may not bother applying. Unless I were actually out of work I'm not sure I'd apply for a job without a posted salary, unless it was with a company that I knew by reputation.

    83. Re:Thank God. by clodney · · Score: 1

      My experience in multiple huge corporations is completely different. Cost is the major factor in hiring. Cost of salaries and health care. H1-B's are much cheaper in both respects and are usually contractors.

      And I agree with that. My experience is that a contractor is easy to approve, but full time headcount is very difficult, because headcount represents a huge expense over time while a contractor is a temporary expense. But once the decision has been made to allow a hire, we aren't quibbling over nickels.

      And for all the vitriol that my original post has generated, I don't believe I have ever hired an H-1B. I've sponsored people for a green card, but most of my team is US citizens. I will hire the best person I can find, regardless of origin, and within reasonable limits, regardless of price.

    84. Re:Thank God. by jimmyfrank · · Score: 1

      The problem is, the demand is so nuts, where I live, even the bad programmers get jobs.

    85. Re:Thank God. by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Then H-1B Visas are not needed.

    86. Re:Thank God. by amirishere · · Score: 1

      Open Arms eehy? No open Intels?

    87. Re:Thank God. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      I am guessing you had a laundry list of reqs, and are paying, what 60k, maybe?

      Sorry guy, my generation KNOWS how much engineers are worth, and KNOWS how much business drones are worth. Fix it or fuck off.

    88. Re:Thank God. by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Make up titles? Junior software engineer? Junior application engineer. Junior systems engineer. Junior technical consultant. Junior software associate.

    89. Re:Thank God. by russotto · · Score: 1

      On behalf of all H1B visa holders, I'd like to say the following:

      Sir, they're not hiring me only because they can afford to pay me less, they're hiring me because I do a better job, for less money and you can't compete with me.

      Mister, if you're not in the top 5% of H-1Bs, they're hiring you because they can pay you less and you have far lower job mobility. If you are in the top 5%, welcome, but you might want to look around at your fellows -- they ain't all that bright. (Neither are most Americans, but the H-1B visa isn't supposed to be for the incompetent.)

      While you were playing Call of Duty on your XBOX, I was taking Calculus 1 as part of my curriculum in *high school*.

      Slow learner, eh?

      I'm not certain I believe you're actually an H-1B holder; while it's true that a lot of people who learned English overseas speak and especially write it more grammatically than a native American English speaker, your message lacks the additional formality which comes with that. Perhaps you've just been here a while.

    90. Re:Thank God. by russotto · · Score: 1

      Not legally. They are *required* to pay me what the market price is for my area (there's a .gov website for that).

      There are so many H-1Bs in tech that H-1Bs set the market price. Messing around with titles can provide the rest. But even if there weren't a price advantage, the reduced mobility associated with a visa worker is worth a lot to employers.

    91. Re:Thank God. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The US allows foreign people to come here and get jobs, an education, etc. Can the same be said of other countries?

      Yes, the same can be said of many countries, including most First World ones. Some of them are more relaxed about it than US, too (Canada would be one prominent example).

      And sorry to say but poor people do not travel around the world to go to school or to get a job. Moving to a country right next door, totally doable. But traveling across an ocean or two? No. Your claim that your family is less fortunate is BS. Out of the 108 foreign grad students (both masters and Ph D) who I have talked to where I work, the lowest family income was a little over $200,000 USD. The same answer was said over and over. The poor people do not get to travel.

      It certainly takes a lot of money studying in US, but travelling by itself is not as expensive as you make it out to be. I moved from Russia to Canada on my own money, when I was earning about $30k/yr in Russia. Granted, back there it was very good money for a software developer at the time, so I wouldn't call myself poor. But relative to an average American, and considering that travel costs are about the same whichever direction you go? He's spot on.

    92. Re:Thank God. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      We have a small number of H-1B's and they're totally able to compete. Large Big Box Indian Body Shop brings them over, most are frauds and don't know squat. However, for the few that are the real deal, they quickly realize that they can earn 30, 40 or 50k more by taking their talents elsewhere. I've gotten some of my best developers by taking on their H-1's when they finally clued into the assraping they're getting from the big boys.

      H1-Bs can't "take their talents elsewhere" anymore so than L-1s can. Their visa ties them to a particular place of employment. They only get some freedom if they apply for a green card, and even then at the final stage of processing. But the same also applies to L-1.

    93. Re:Thank God. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Firstly, speaking as an H-1B holder, the law *requires* that H-1B workers are paid the average salary or better for their job title in their location -- e.g. an H-1B worker hired as a "junior software engineer" in San Francisco cannot be paid less than $90,000.

      Speaking as an L-1 holder who went that path because it was easier than H1-B at the moment, you skimp over the visa terms. Getting tied to a particular place of employment is a pretty big deal, and it severely disadvantages a salaried employee, giving his employer undue power. Whether it is abused or not is another matter, but I find it hard to believe that it is never or rarely abused, and when it is, it indirectly affects labor conditions for everyone.

      I would agree, though, that from my personal observations the claim of lower salaries for H1-Bs and L-1s does not hold. I have compared my own against what I see at GlassDoor, for example, and it's a fair bit above average for similar work titles even in the same company. From what I heard from folk in Apple, Google, Facebook and Amazon, it's the same there - they haven't observed anything to conclude that they have a smaller paycheck or less frequent promotions because they are H1-Bs. On the other hand, clearly, this is anecdotal experience, not data - for all we know Tata could really be squeezing every last single cent out of their H1-Bs.

    94. Re:Thank God. by russotto · · Score: 1

      H1-Bs can't "take their talents elsewhere" anymore so than L-1s can. Their visa ties them to a particular place of employment. They only get some freedom if they apply for a green card, and even then at the final stage of processing. But the same also applies to L-1.

      H-1Bs are transferrable if the new employer is willing to sponsor. Personally I hope the GP was telling the truth; stripping the H-1B body shops of their few good people might actually cause their clients to realize they're getting screwed.

    95. Re:Thank God. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      H-1Bs are transferrable if the new employer is willing to sponsor.

      That limits the choice of the new employer quite severely, don't you think?

      There's also the issue of green card application. Unless you're far enough into it, you'll basically have to start from scratch. That's a deal killer for a lot of people.

    96. Re:Thank God. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Not to mention so far the whole globalism scam has done nothing but import and export misery. 9 out of the 10 most cancerous cities are in China now, make it top 20 and India is just as bad, meanwhile every job in America is becoming a "McJob" thanks to "Hire not to hire an American".

      Frankly i wouldn't even say it was under education, as if the supply and demand curve weren't allowed to be tilted then the demand (and wages and benefits) would go up and people would pursue these careers but instead because Habib can get a degree (or lie his ass off, like 10 years of Win 8 exp) for $10k and it costs 7 times that or more for an American why the fuck should ANY American want to go into ANY of the fields the H1-Bs are currently taking?

      It is JUST like what happened with construction. there were MANY Americans willing and happy to work in construction but they found they could hire Juan for $4 an hour and not pay benefits or workman's comp and suddenly there weren't any Americans on the construction sites anymore. it has gotten to bad that teens will yell "Immigra!" just to watch them scatter like deer here. Its fucking sad and pathetic is what it is, our whole damned country has been sold out to a handful at the top and We, the People will get the bill.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    97. Re:Thank God. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      just being born here doesn't guarantee you a fucking thing.

      Sure it does. It guarantees a lifetime of owing US taxes. You are advocating abolishing all protections for citizens. Yes, you get citizenship at birth in the US, and the way the government works, they should be given preference within the US over non-citizens.

    98. Re:Thank God. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      We are passing the bill to our children and the top is not complaining as long as we don't revolt. The insane part is that the rest of the world is going along with it as well so that when the US finally collapses, the rest of the world will take a hit as well.

      When I went to college in the 90s (not that long ago) someone could go to a state university and graduate with $20,000 or so in debt and expect to make more than that their first year, paying off all debt relatively easily in 5 years. But now, I checked tuition recently, and it's about 5 times what it was then, so $100,000 for a "cheap" education, and no chance of paying that off in 5 years unless you have outside assistance (live at home or such). So why bother with college, it's a financial loser now.

    99. Re:Thank God. by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      That is why I've been saying that everybody needs to hang on, as the education bubble will burst soon, followed by the financial bubble. One of the guys in the apt building next door actually committed suicide over student loans recently, being so buried in debt that he'd never be able to pay off the bill and being hounded by the collectors and I believe we will see millions simply get disposable phones and will "drop off the grid" as much as possible simply because student loans have made living in the system impossible. I live next to a college and have already met several like that, taking cash only work and doing their best to simply drop out because of the collectors and thanks to there being no real way to ever get rid of this debt when the bubble bursts you are gonna see a massive amount of debt that like the housing simply gets repackaged and sold like a hot potato until the whole thing falls down. you simply can't charge $50k-$80k for even a lousy education and expect the average person to be able to work their way out of it with McJobs, its is simply not possible.

      Then the final bubble will burst, all the IRA and 401Ks without anyone to put money in and no real safe places to go will simply have no place to go. I watched a talk recently (sorry i didn't think to save the link) with several fund managers and they were discussing this, how they are quickly running out of places to put the money. The former go to places either pay nothing or are too unstable, so as one put it "We are spending all our time on the phones just trying to find foreign places with stability as we are finding less and less in the USA that meets that criteria".

      Did you know that nearly half the USA pays no taxes at all, because after bills are paid they are simply too poor? And the disability and social security payouts are shooting up as more people file just to survive and to be able to afford their ever increasing costs of medications. I can tell you with relatives on disability that once on they can never get off, that they end up in a catch 22 where the meds they require which would allow them to work are so expensive that if they got a job they couldn't afford their meds so all they could do is stay where they are, which is grinding poverty. One uncle could easily work but the med that allows him his ability to function costs over $100k a year and he'd be lucky to qualify for a 30K a year job so he simply sits at home watching TV.

      Just read this article and you will see that just looking at the numbers there is no way its sustainable long term, you have too few making real money and too many in life sucking desperate poverty for the system as is to survive. And as far as the rest of the world i have to wonder...what do they think will happen when a nuclear superpower falls apart? as we saw with the collapse of the USSR things can get nasty quickly and there won't be a USA to quietly come along and try to help if we fall.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    100. Re:Thank God. by jep305 · · Score: 1

      Every H1B worker I've ever dealt with was provided by an outsourcing company. EVERY. SINGLE. ONE.

      Whether the outsourcing company provided benefits, I have no idea.

      --
      In Reason We Trust
    101. Re:Thank God. by jep305 · · Score: 1

      Amen.

      "the U.S. will face a shortage of 224,000 tech workers by 2018 unless immigration rules are loosened" -- OR unless we start training our own people right now, maybe.

      --
      In Reason We Trust
    102. Re:Thank God. by HereIAmJH · · Score: 1

      I imagine that there are plenty of midwestern large-scale farmers who are millionaires

      It depends on how you define millionaire. Around here you need a 1000 or 2000 acres minimum to earn a decent living. And land prices are running close to $3000 an acre. So you are starting out with $3-6 million in land. Then you throw in several $100k in equipment and it sure looks like you're living high on the hog. Unfortunately many of the independent farmers are mortgaged to within an inch of their life. Farming is risky and should pay well; some times it does, sometimes Mother Nature doesn't cooperate and you lose your life savings.

      --
      Another day, another update to a Google android app.
    103. Re:Thank God. by TaliesinWI · · Score: 1

      Wow, Doogie, you were quite the student. What high school did you go to? I'd like to send my kids there.

    104. Re:Thank God. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Just read this article and you will see that just looking at the numbers there is no way its sustainable long term, you have too few making real money and too many in life sucking desperate poverty for the system as is to survive.

      It isn't sustainable. I moved out of the US because of that. Maybe I'll move back if the collapse happens and the result is better, but given those who choose to voice their opinions, it'll likely be worse.

    105. Re:Thank God. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Lucky bastard, some of us have elderly family here and can't go, not to mention my oldest is studying to be a doctor and I have a feeling if the crap hits the fan he'll be another Che Guevara as he is a big champion of the poor and seems to have natural leadership abilities.

      I'm just glad we have plenty of relatives living in the country with good farm land and hunting weapons because as my late grandma taught me about the great depression when the crap hits the fan having a steady source of food is probably the best thing you can have. Fucking sad that we even have to speak of such things but more and more it smells to me like an old friend told me about those last years in Saigon, how outward signs were all "Everything is gonna be fine!" while those with money and power were quietly cashing out and slinking away. I wish i had the link but something like 18% of the fortune 100 top money earners have quietly cashed out and done as you did, it makes me think they know the real numbers and don't want to be here when it all falls down.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    106. Re:Thank God. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My grandfather started a hardware store during the great depression (later becoming one of the founding stores of the True Value Hardware brand). Having money when a crash happens is an opportunity, I wouldn't mind returning in the depression if my cash can be used to my advantage, but I doubt it. The uncertainty and danger would be too high. I'll stay away and send money home to the family.

  3. Hire the unemployed by smooth+wombat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know this will sound crazy, and I'm just spitballing here, but bear with me.

    There is a large group of people in this country trying to find jobs. Some have been out of work for months, if not years, while others are looking to move on with their career. Tech companies are complaining they can't find anyone which is why they have to go the H-1B visa route

    Here comes the crazy part. Someone needs to figure out a way to get the people who are out of work in touch with these companies who are "desperate" to fill these open positions. It's a win-win situation. People who are out of work get to go back to work, and companies get to fill these open positions.

    I'm not capable of figuring out how to do this so someone else will have to do the heavy lifting, but I assure you, if there is some way this can be done, they will be given laurels by the tech industry.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:Hire the unemployed by dkf · · Score: 5, Informative

      Someone needs to figure out a way to get the people who are out of work in touch with these companies who are "desperate" to fill these open positions. It's a win-win situation.

      Won't work. Many of those Americans aren't skilled in tech, and none of them are willing to be treated as slaves. That means that they'll have the temerity to demand proper training and pay! That would never do, as it might slightly cut into the fat bonuses given to part of the 1% lording it over the tech industry...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    2. Re:Hire the unemployed by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Informative

      AC wrote:

      >Americans ask for more money than they are worth.

      No, Americans ask for more money than H1B visa holders are willing to work for. Wages as a share of the GDP peaked in 1972 in the U.S. yet profits over-all are still going up --- H1B visas are a tiny part of how corporations are able to get more work done for less money paid so as to maximize profit.

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    3. Re:Hire the unemployed by HunsV · · Score: 1

      If only the execs would just admit that they want to bring in foreign workers because they are cheaper, instead of lying about how there is such a "shortage."

    4. Re:Hire the unemployed by localman57 · · Score: 2

      >Americans ask for more money than they are worth.

      No, Americans ask for more money than H1B visa holders are willing to work for.

      Isn't this how a free market economy determines prices? The point at which supply and demand meet sets the price. It seems like people are complaining about the supply of labor being made available.

      Nothing but market dynamics are forcing anyone to leave India, or China, or any of those places and come over here. It seems to me that if anything, the fact that there is an H1B system, and immigration system at all, is actually a barrier to trade which overvalues American talent versus equivalent talent from other places. Yes, people leave Mumbai or beijing because the conditions are awful, and they aren't here. But that is just part of what factors into that curve.

      In the end, as we move to a more and more global economy, the relative value of a certain labor skill will equalize across the globe. The American manufacturing worker has already had to deal with this. I don't see why it won't work it's way up the economic ladder. Basically, it feels to me like the economic equivalent of the Universe's natural tendency to want to disipate any differential of anything.

      (Part of this was cut-and paste from an earlier comment of mine, but I still feel this way...)

    5. Re:Hire the unemployed by localman57 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm an older worker (47) and be more than happy to take what I can get. I'd be more than happy to learn a new language, platform, tools, etc .... I'm just a C,C++, Java, SQL guy on UNIX and Windows so my skills are out of date and no one uses those languages and platforms anymore. And I haven't been working for a few years in the industry - just developing software for my businesses that tanked in the economy.

      I hear this sort of thing all the time when I'm intervewing candidates. People say to me, Yeah, I'd really like to learn [Java,C#,Ruby,SomeOtherLanguage]. Then I ask them what they think about [FreeDevelopmentEnvironmentForThatLanguage]. And they say "Oh, I haven't downloaded that yet." .

      Next...

      If you've been unemployed for months and have nothing to show for that time, you're probably not somebody I want to hire.

    6. Re:Hire the unemployed by snobody · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean, ways to find workers like Monster.com or Dice.com?

      These companies aren't hiring anyone that they would have to train unless they're just looking for an H1B worker. I work for a large multinational company in the U.S. and I have seen the job postings they put out. They're so full of precise specifics that the worker absolutely must have that an American engineer won't be able to fit the bill. Then they hire the H1B from the overseas office that they had in mind in the first place (and who fit the onerous job requirements exactly, strangely enough) and pay him less. It's a scam. What we need is a nice, well-funded PAC for IT workers and engineers that can lean on the lawmakers and tell Oracle and Micro$oft to get bent. The only way to get the lawmakers to listen to us is to bribe them with campaign contributions. It sucks, but that's the system we have in this country.

      Oh, and this Project for a New American Economy reminds me a lot of the Project for a New American Century, which brought us the Iraq war.

    7. Re:Hire the unemployed by mir · · Score: 1

      Also, Americans often have huge student loans to pay back. I don't know about Indians, who get the vast majority of H1-Bs, but at least Europeans often got free, or very cheap, education, so are able to work for less.

      So to simplify things only slightly, H1-B is a scheme for US companies to siphon out foreign tax money. Nice!

      --
      Look, that's why there's rules, understand? So that you think before you break 'em. (Terry Pratchett)
    8. Re:Hire the unemployed by zero0ne · · Score: 1

      - Americans also have family to take care of (say the H-1B sends money back home... that money goes way further than it would for an American doing the same)
      - Americans also have student loans, which is constantly rising due to the nature of how College tuition / loan stuff works

    9. Re:Hire the unemployed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Americans are welcome to study in India at Indian rates. Note that the education system is crappy and has an acceptance ratio of less than 5%. (0.5-1% in the universities where american companies recruit from)You essentially study in 2 schools simultaneously for the last 2-3 years of your school life (9th-12th grade, or 11th - 12th grade)
      Its relatively cheap, usually financed by parents with the expectation that you will finance your kids education and so on, hence loans are minimal at best
      And, I doubt many Europeans want to come to the US anyways (as you mention, Indians get most H1B's)

    10. Re:Hire the unemployed by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      IANAE but my understanding is that 'the market' works under the premise that supply will increase to the level required by demand, and prices will be set wherever the points meet.

      If the situation is that there are people in the US who qualify for the jobs, then the industry must not be willing to pay enough to get these people to work.

      If the situation is that there are not enough people in the US who qualify for the jobs, then we should see industry paying much more than would otherwise be expected to fill the jobs and we should see younger people flooding the training and education facilities relevant to the jobs in question in order to get paid this premium (at least until the premium comes down as supply goes up, assuming demand remains constant).

      My belief is that the first situation applies and that there are Americans who can do the work, but who want / need to get paid more than industry wants to pay.

      The alternative would imply that ignorance and laziness are rampant in the US to the point where honest companies just can't find good employees no matter how much they're willing to pay.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    11. Re:Hire the unemployed by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      This idea is based on the assumption that corporations want to find these people. That's not a good assumption.

    12. Re:Hire the unemployed by troc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know they could be bringing these people in because all the decent, diligent, intelligent and reliable local workers have jobs already and those without jobs are crap at what they do. Or am I mistaken and actually all Americans, even the thick and stupid ones, are better workers than highly-educated and motivated people from countries like India or from within the EU?

      Just a thought.

      --
      Troc's dubious podcast and blog: http://www.trocnet.net
    13. Re:Hire the unemployed by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

      But they are temporary contract workers! If they were asking for more Green Cards allowing these people to become citizens then you have a point. Otherwise, it is just low wage slave workers.

    14. Re:Hire the unemployed by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      They're in touch. HR departments find excuses to skip over qualified American workers and sponsor as many H1Bs as they are allowed. I've seen it firsthand. Try to prove it, though. The game is rigged.

      We need some big new powerful unions in this country.

    15. Re:Hire the unemployed by localman57 · · Score: 2

      It's worked out great for Greece for years and years and years. They were able to live far above their means. The problem with Greece isn't the rest of the world, it's their attitudes. Read about their labor laws. Their retirement benefits. The way they utterly screwed up just about every aspect of hosting the Olympics. They have a societal set of expectations that don't match the reality of what they're capable/willing to produce. The fact is, that country is 2000 years past it's prime, and is going to stay that way until the population gets with the program.

    16. Re:Hire the unemployed by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 1

      They're so full of precise specifics that the worker absolutely must have that an American engineer won't be able to fit the bill. Then they hire the H1B from the overseas office that they had in mind in the first place (and who fit the onerous job requirements exactly, strangely enough) and pay him less.

      Yep. That's exactly how it works. If you have any doubts about that, watch this.

    17. Re:Hire the unemployed by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Except for the fact that the corporations are charging higher prices in America.

      In many cases due to legal protection by the goverment.

      I can't go to another country and import the inexpensive products they sell there like I should be able to in an open market. Instead we pay 5 to 20 times as much for the same products.

      The problem is fixing itself. Labor rates are skyrocketing over there.
      Indian workers are much more picky than they used to be.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    18. Re:Hire the unemployed by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Probably so. A universe that had a tendency to become ever more organized would probably be really boring. Although eventually our universe will get that way too, I suppose, when it's all just one perfectly mixed, never-ending sameness. Like driving on I-80 through Iowa.

    19. Re:Hire the unemployed by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      You know they could be bringing these people in because all the decent, diligent, intelligent and reliable local workers have jobs already and those without jobs are crap at what they do. Or am I mistaken and actually all Americans, even the thick and stupid ones, are better workers than highly-educated and motivated people from countries like India or from within the EU?

      Just a thought.

      This is anecdotal, but I've known plenty of excellent CS grads to have a hell of a time finding work after college. I was a bit more fortunate only because I had an internship (basically the same responsibilities as any other coder, but for minimum wage) for a couple years during college, but most people run into the catch-22 that, if you don't have 2 years dev job experience, you can't find a dev job. I've also come across a glut of H1-Bs that are rarely worth their salt. I've worked closely with 15 or so, and I can only think of one that was any good. I have, however, seen some excellent work from foreigners who came to the US for school, then got dev jobs afterward.

      Anyway, my point here is that the existence of talented foreign workers does not change the fact that the H1-B workers are (usually) unqualified and that there are plenty of qualified Americans available for these tech jobs.

    20. Re:Hire the unemployed by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 1

      Actually most schools (even Indian ones) charge foreign students more than native ones. They also tend to teach in their native language. This is an issue for people who typically only get exposed to English (& Spanish) with a few northeastern states hearing a bit of french. The language barrier alone means having to find someone to teach you (at US rates) the native language well enough you could learn in it.

      You may as well say that language is an artificial barrier to the market and that we should all speak the same language just to add mobility to the market.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    21. Re:Hire the unemployed by anerki · · Score: 1

      Doesn't the state offer free or payed reschooling for all jobs that seriously lack properly trained personnel? (note: properly trained, most companies don't have problems finding minimum wage workers, they have problems finding employees with the required (and often very specific) skills).

      Here the state funds education (for 3 years, with full pay + benefits) for unemployed people who want to become a nurse. It's one of those jobs that's dieing out because it's not 'sexy' enough, but on the rise back because of it. And it's not something you want to get a shortage of ... Those programs make a lot of sense, I pushed to hire an long time unemployed person, simply because he took 3 months of such a specific course that was relevant to us, and because he showed so much motivation for it ... It pays off in the end, at least tenfold ...

      - It's just as expensive to school someone than to do follow-up to force them to get a job they don't want. (already just in people you need to do it it comes out cheaper, 1 person can teach 40/day, but only do follow-up for 10/day)
      - They return the investment in them in a couple of months in taxes alone
      - You no longer have to pay them unemployment when they do finally get a job
      - You reduce unemployment because you're founding a state funded school for hard-to-find jobs :) And as soon as it lifts off (years ago) companies, like mine, will dump time and money in those foundations to get the first pick in choosing the new students (eventually, we'll just be training them ourselves)

      --
      Life is great! (as told by Lady Susan)
    22. Re:Hire the unemployed by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You know they could be bringing these people in because all the decent, diligent, intelligent and reliable local workers have jobs already and those without jobs are crap at what they do. Or am I mistaken and actually all Americans, even the thick and stupid ones, are better workers than highly-educated and motivated people from countries like India or from within the EU?

      Just a thought.

      You only have a point if you can quantify the items in bold above. The fact is that is that:

      1. Not everybody that is currently unemployed is crappy at what they do.

      2. Not everybody currently employed is good at what they do.

      3. Not every H1 Visa worker is highly educated and motivated.

      4. Not every H1 Visa worker is crappy at what he does.

      All you are doing is building a counter-argument based on simpleton-level emotion. Markets, even free markets, do not operate in a vacuum. They operate (or should operate) in the context of national interests. Every developed country sans the US operates on this premise.

      So when you have a H1 Visa worker coming here, he should only come here when it is amply demonstrated that indeed, he is above average.

      This is not the case. We should not be replacing our crappy people with crappy people from other countries. We should replace them (or more appropriately, enhance our intelligentsia) with actual foreign talent. And that brings me to the next hole in your argument:

      There is no guaranteed path to residency (and eventual citizenship) for H1 Visa workers. As it is, it is a system of exploitation of foreign workers (talented or crappy) at the expense of our workers (talented and crappy.)

      The situation is so bad that even legal residents or naturalized citizens of Indian ancestry are now looked over in favor of H1 visa workers. I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT.

      So it is not just the mythical phat American as you put it that gets screwed by this. The talented foreign nationals that have now made the US their permanent home and country are also being systematically sidelined.

      The H1 Visa system needs to be revampted, the quotas reduced into formulas dependend on the current national situation and unemployment/employment levels. It should not be static.

      Furthermore, the requirements should be stringent so that only the real talented come aboard. Moreover, there must be greater guarantees that H1 Visa workers do not become hostages to contracting agencies, cramping them into dorms, threatened with deportation if they don't meet the unpaid 60hr/week work quota (yes it happens in US soil, a lot.)

      Most importantly, there should be easier paths for legal residency (and nationalisation) for H1 Visa workers who wish to stay permanently.

      .... Or you can dismiss this and say that it is just us being the lazy farts that complain because them Goobacks, dey turk err jurbs.

      Your pick.

    23. Re:Hire the unemployed by gishzida · · Score: 2

      Obviously a Troll from the 1%... I'm an experienced network admin in a small crappy southern town where they want pay $50K, crap benefits, and want you to work like a dog... but I could afford to accept that kind of wage here because the COL is lower if they'd here me... but here experience is unimportant -- cost is everything... being "old" is a disadvantage...

      months back I was reading a NYTimes article [See: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/01/29/us/bay-area-technology-professionals-cant-get-hired-as-industry-moves-on.html?pagewanted=all ] about of the number of experienced tech people in Silicon Valley that can't get jobs because the big companies like Google, Apple, Oracle, and so forth are interested in young and cheap --- that's how the execs afford to pay themselves so well...

      Of course I'm sure that since you are willing to save $45K it's covering the cost of your housing or Cadillacs at the expense of the guy you'd hire who has to live in a roach infested closet in Castro valley

      So the reality is if you are an old tech professional and get fired or laid off you are not likely to get re-hired... The H1B program is a corporate welfare program. It should be eliminated as Pork. Yes I can hear the squeeling--- that's pork too...

    24. Re:Hire the unemployed by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you've been unemployed for months and have nothing to show for that time, you're probably not somebody I want to hire.

      I was an admin for 5 years and have worked in IT for more than a decade. Two years ago I lost my job because it was a 'cost cutting move' by the board of the group I worked for. When I went looking for work, I looked at any IT jobs I could qualify for. Which goes from helpdesk work up to admin work of various types. Any job less than my last I heard back from said I was overqualified and wouldn't hire me. Any job equal to or slightly more than I had done wanted a degree higher than what I had and wouldn't even give me an interview.

      I did plenty of things during that period, but none of them where specifically for any company. I even tried to do a bit of consulting and had a little bit of work as such. However after a point everyone assumes that if you weren't working for another company during that time you did nothing and you therefor are not hire-able. In the end I found a college that was willing to give me a job as a onsite technician for pennies and it looks like I'll have to rebuild my entire career because a change in the market. That is frankly silly.

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
    25. Re:Hire the unemployed by TFAFalcon · · Score: 2

      Ok, but let's equalize all prices across the world then. Sure, American workers cost more, but they also need more money just to survive. Food and housing is pretty expensive in the US. And if labor costs are to be equalized across the world, then why not equalize everything else too? Like the price of medicine, software,... Why are corporations allowed to determine where their products can be traded after they sell them, but Americans aren't allowed to say who can immigrate into their country?

    26. Re:Hire the unemployed by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 2

      If people in San Francisco are asking $140k/year for entry-level software engineering, perhaps it's because you can't pay rent on a decent place to live in San Francisco with a lower salary than that. I suggest you simply move your business out of San Francisco, to the rest of the country where median pay for software engineers overall is $90k/year, median pay for entry-level if $65k/year, and people can actually live on those salaries.

    27. Re:Hire the unemployed by spiffmastercow · · Score: 2

      Interesting, because I'd call it market manipulation. You're dumping an undervalued commodity into an otherwise closed system, driving down the prices of that commodity as a whole.

    28. Re:Hire the unemployed by CycleFreak · · Score: 1

      Great idea that seems simple enough on the surface. Until reality sets in.

      The unemployed are rarely already located where the job openings can be found. Due to the financial / housing debacle, they really cannot afford to move. Done - end of story. They already have very little money (if not a mountain of debt), so they certainly cannot afford to sell their house for less than they owe on the mortgage. And we haven't started on the other variables: Family in town? Kids in school? Spouse working locally? Moving for a job is rarely as easy as people think it is.

      Then, there's the location itself. I've seen numerous postings for IT jobs in Detroit. Even if I was unemployed, I would not move there. (Apologies if you live in Detroit or think it's a fine city.)

    29. Re:Hire the unemployed by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      This has to be said on every H1-B thread:

      The market does not work properly when corporations buy congress to make their own rules or when they buy off politicians to look the other way and not enforce laws on the books. If everyone follows fair rules the market works. This is another great example of market distortion. The corporate elite are fine with the market with it goes their way but then buy favors when it doesn't. Our Corporate elite are *not* pro-free market, or to be more precise only pro-free market when the results favor them.

    30. Re:Hire the unemployed by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      It is a global economy problem, but having said that the U.S. is the only country that I know of that doesn't enforce rules put in place to make sure that their own citizens get first crack at jobs. Even the Chinese do this.

      There is nothing wrong with taking care of your own first.

    31. Re:Hire the unemployed by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      And you can easily reject that alternative, as the jobs that foreign workers are needed for are paid less then the executive positions. The company obviously feels that a skilled worker (CEO for example) is worth quite a lot of money, but are not willing to hire more of them if they can get cheap 'imports'.

    32. Re:Hire the unemployed by localman57 · · Score: 1

      This has to be said on every H1-B thread:

      Yup. You and I pretty much had the same discussion two weeks ago: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2884131&cid=40157623 . :-)

    33. Re:Hire the unemployed by cfulton · · Score: 1

      What?
      Try any industry that has internal development needs (Banking, Insurance, Health Care, Advertising...) they all or most use Java and SQL on UNIX or Windows.
      If you are a good C, C++ coder look into device manufacturers. These languages are the basis of their industry. They always need good programmers.
      If you really have that skill set and cannot find a job you are not looking. Just because the cool new thing is phone applications does not mean that corporations have thrown away their servers and existing code bases. Look around and stop complaining. I have recruiters call me every week looking for Java guys. Stop looking at headlines and start looking for a job.

      --
      No sigs in BETA. Beta SUCKS.
    34. Re:Hire the unemployed by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      Yeah, now if only programs like that actually existed. But as our Republican overlords are so quick to point out, that's Socialism(tm). And by Republican logic, since that's a socialist program, and nazis were socialists, that's a nazi program. You nazi.

    35. Re:Hire the unemployed by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      American workers are the most productive...

    36. Re:Hire the unemployed by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Earing 50K - 100k is not low wage slave work. H1b have saleries higher than most Americans. While temporary they contribute to the economy by buying American goods and buying American services while they are here. Only a fraction of their saleries leave America in the form of money sent home. A outsourced worker living in India spends his pay in India.

    37. Re:Hire the unemployed by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      I hear this sort of thing all the time when I'm intervewing candidates. People say to me, Yeah, I'd really like to learn [Java,C#,Ruby,SomeOtherLanguage]. Then I ask them what they think about [FreeDevelopmentEnvironmentForThatLanguage]. And they say "Oh, I haven't downloaded that yet." .

      I completely agree. However, what if OP would be willing to learn "all/any of the above." For example, they could be hammering on Ruby for 4 months but ignoring Java. Doesn't mean they are lazy or stupid - could mean that they haven't gotten around to it yet - but they have shown an interest/track record in learning new things.

    38. Re:Hire the unemployed by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your interest. But you'll note that the job you have applied for specified a requirement of "20 years experience in Java programming."

      LOL! This reminds me of a job I applied for, right across the river from where I work, only to be told by the recruiter they didn't have a job available.

      What made this so hilarious was that I submitted my resume 3 hours after it was posted so either the job truly didn't exist and they were fishing, or the guy was a hack.

      I chose the latter because he was "kind enough" to send me emails of "How to find a job in this market!" or, "What employers are really looking for" emails for the first two weeks.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    39. Re:Hire the unemployed by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      People in SF are asking for 140k to be an entry level PHP engineer. Why would I spend 140k when I can get someone for 100k.
      If you can get someone from the U.S. for 100k, then that is fine. If you have to get an H1B to come over to work for 100k, then that is illegal.
      Incidentally, I don't make near that much, but you'd probably have to pay me abut $140k to do PHP too.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    40. Re:Hire the unemployed by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Looking for a job is a full time job. That being said, when I was looking for a job, I was still doing some side projects in new technologies. However, nobody was really interested because I hadn't done them in a "professional environment". I had never used Oracle for work, but I had it installed at home and I had gotten certified at the Mastery level in PL/SQL by Brainbench (showing my age). Also, got certified at the mastery level for Project Management. I ended up going back to basically an entry level job at entry level wages. I still have only pulled myself up to just under half what I used to make.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    41. Re:Hire the unemployed by Virtucon · · Score: 1

      Actually it may also help if you vote the idiots in Congress out. Just sayin....

      The problem is these incumbents don't fight too hard for their jobs and at least 3/4 of them are re-elected all the time. The Senate drags the average down a bit, but if you can get into Congress then you're pretty much set for life.

      Garbage In, Garbage Out.

      --
      Harrison's Postulate - "For every action there is an equal and opposite criticism"
    42. Re:Hire the unemployed by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      I am in complete agreement with you. It makes perfect sense what you said and is not the least bit crazy. The US is a mature country and has a lot of people we can educate to fill all of the job openings we have. We need to tell corporations to help educate and hire these people.

    43. Re:Hire the unemployed by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Thank you for your interest. But you'll note that the job you have applied for specified a requirement of "20 years experience in Java programming." As you do not meet this qualification, we cannot consider you
      I can't tell you how much I hate automated application sites where they just say "No thank you" if you are able to meet only 99 of their 100 criteria, even though the original job posting listed some of them as "preferred" and not "required". I mean, I have the necessary years of SQL, Oracle, Java, C++, HTML, XML, Management, but lack something ridiculous like I've never add cells B7 and H94 in Excel, even though I've added lots of other cells. I've actually gotten kicked out of an app and then went back and ticked the box next to the requirement because anybody actually hiring for the position would not want people to get filtered out on such stupid criteria.
      And then there are the ones where it kicks me out of the application because I don't have an H1B number, being as how I'm a citizen and all.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    44. Re:Hire the unemployed by Howitzer86 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the best thing to do is to abandon your US citizenship, become a naturalized citizen of another country, and then apply for an H-1B visa back in the US.

    45. Re:Hire the unemployed by amirishere · · Score: 1

      I'm not capable of figuring out how to do this so someone else will have to do the heavy lifting, but I assure you, if there is some way this can be done, they will be given laurels by the tech industry.

      I can do that for you. You just have to wait till I get my H-1B.

    46. Re:Hire the unemployed by captjc · · Score: 1

      F-ing-A man. It is even worse for the college graduates. How do you get experience when no one wants to hire people with no experience.

      --
      Slow Down Cowboy! It's been 1 hour, 47 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment
    47. Re:Hire the unemployed by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      "They" are asking for more green cards for H1-B workers, if by "they" you mean Microsoft, Apple, Google, Facebook, Amazon and many other tech companies. Vast majority of green card holders I know at MS were H1-Bs previously, and most H1-Bs that I know have already applied for a green card and are in various stages of the process (one just got his green card a week ago) - indeed, that's what Microsoft urges you to do in no uncertain terms during orientation.

    48. Re:Hire the unemployed by unsignedShort · · Score: 1


      The situation Sucks... The answer is clear though.

      1) H1b needs to be stopped. It needs to be turned into an immigration program which requires qualified people to apply for and retain citizenship.
      If we find people from other countries that actually have skills we need to import, they are an asset and need to be encouraged to stay. No temporary work permit.. Only a track to citizenship justified by their skills.

      2) the same is true for scholarship programs. Why would we educate people and then force them home to another country.
      Imagine.. we get great people from all over the world who come to get an education and actually stay here and create companies and jobs.

      3) colleges need to provide 2 year associates degrees to create US tech workers that are as equally uneducated as the average h1b.
      Most of the junior computer science jobs i have seen shouldn't require a 4 year engineering degree. From what I have experienced from interviewing, other cultures do not have the issues with lying (or drastically bending the truth) that natives do. A 4 year engineering degree requirement makes an artificially high barrier to entry and requires a higher salary to justify the effort and associated dropout risk.

      It will never happen. Colleges make more money from 4 year programs. Companies like their slave labor. Government is spineless (when it comes to standing up against the ones funding their campaign).

  4. Duh! by CajunArson · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just go to H1B v6 and you'll get a HUGE number of available slots.

    --
    AntiFA: An abbreviation for Anti First Amendment.
  5. Shortage by 2018 by pev · · Score: 2

    Er... Is it really that hard to train up some good people in six years? Surely the last remaining world super-power could manage that?

    1. Re:Shortage by 2018 by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      It is cheaper to get other countries to train people, then import them to work here.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    2. Re:Shortage by 2018 by Krneki · · Score: 1

      Why would you want to do that when you can get people already trained? The free market will resolve all human problems, nothing to see here, move along.

      --
      Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    3. Re:Shortage by 2018 by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Your proposal sounds dangerously close to advocating that we spend our precious, precious, resources on developing the skills of workers rather than handing performance bonuses to management or dividends to investors. Go back to Cuba, Communist!

      Sure, we could apply the radical theory that markets are reasonably good at balancing supply and demand, and tell the people whining to Congress that if their supply is too low, they just aren't paying enough, or doing enough to bolster supply(eg. by hiring candidates and training them, rather than sitting around and pouting because they can't find enough suckers who will pay for 100% of their own education and then accept wages that might let them finish paying down that debt in a couple of decades...)

    4. Re:Shortage by 2018 by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ..apparently the answer is Yes

      The world last Superpower is only that based on it's military, which is based on manufacturing strength

      The more that is outsourced and done elsewhere the less US corporations will have to deal with US workers ... you already have one of the largest differences in Pay between Management and Workers, weak or non-existent unions to protect workers rights..... I see a future when a few corporations will get very rich, and the US population will be out of work

       

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    5. Re:Shortage by 2018 by gman003 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Surely the last remaining world super-power could manage that?

      Well yes, they probably could, but I fail to see what China has to do with any of this...

  6. Re:Cant Americans compete? by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    while others argue that offering visas to foreign workers reduces job prospects for Americans

    H1B's are living and working in the same environment as Americans.H1B's typically have lower educational opportunities than Americans(Americans have access to educational facilities worldwide, but its very difficult for a foreigner to get admission in an educational insitute in America(for someone from one of the countries from where people aspire to live in America)) Then, why cant Americans compete with H1B's?

    Because they expect to be paid more. You are not going to do a 12-hour a day IT job for the same money as a car salesman working 8 hours a day if you can get a job as a car salesman. On the other hand offer someone from a low-wage country 20k a year, give them a visa that won't let them change jobs and you're set up.

  7. Things aren't as they seem by laffer1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When my former employer started hiring H1B, the government did a check of salaries compared to market values in the area. The other programmers had to get a raise. There are laws about salary, especially for the guy managing an H1B employee which turned out to be me. He also turned out to be one of the best programmers I've worked with.

    I used to have strong feelings against the H1B program, but after seeing jobs unfilled at several employers now, sometimes it makes sense.

    1. Re:Things aren't as they seem by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      Again, what is wrong with hiring someone who may require some training?

    2. Re:Things aren't as they seem by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      The fact that your other programmers had to get raises so that an H-1B worker could be hired shows your employer was paying far below the average in the area. It doesn't speak to the ethical nature of your former employer, or their willingness to pay reasonable wages to local workers.

  8. I have a cunning plan by gbjbaanb · · Score: 2

    "Industry lobby group Partnership for A New American Economy last month released a study that claims the U.S. will face a shortage of 224,000 tech workers by 2018 unless more native workers are taken on and trained!

    fixed that for them, I wonder if they appreciate my contribution on their behalf.

  9. bullcrap by java-lawson · · Score: 2

    This is a total scam. I'm all for people immigrating to the US and assimilating. But this worker program is a complete and total scam. Why don't we import lawyers by the tens of thousands and see how the politicians (most of whom were lawyers) react? We have plenty of US Citizens who are unemployed and are trainable in IT.

    1. Re:bullcrap by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Thankfully, legal systems, codes of law, and bodies of case law vary nontrivially between jurisdictions, and we have, um, totally vital, regulations to the effect that you need to be certified state-by-state in order to legally practice. This protects vulnerable Americans from an influx of cheap foreign lawyers...

    2. Re:bullcrap by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

      You can be sure that Lawyers will always be a protected class.

    3. Re:bullcrap by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 1

      Because we already have plenty of unemployed graduates from law schools, too. What do you think happened to all those smart young people who avoided majoring in STEM fields because they knew they'd be displaced by off-shoring and H1B's?

  10. Obligatory Southpark meme by Krneki · · Score: 4, Funny

    Thyr T'rk 'r jewrg!

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  11. H-1bs Drive Out Skilled But Not Unskilled by Baldrson · · Score: 5, Informative
    This should probably be its own /. story:

    Study: When highly skilled immigrants move in, highly skilled natives move out

    In the first study to measure the temporary impact of highly skilled immigrants on native populations, University of Notre Dame Economist Abigail Wozniak and Fairfield University's Thomas J. Murray — a former Notre Dame graduate student — found that when highly skilled immigrants move to a city or town, the U.S. natives in that area who are also highly skilled tend to move away. However, the study found that the same immigrant group's presence decreases the chances that low-skilled natives would leave.

    "High skill" refers to those having some post-secondary education or above, while "low skill" are those with a high school diploma or less education. "Natives" refer to U.S. citizens by birth.

    According to the study, which will appear in the July issue of the Journal of Urban Economics, smaller and more geographically isolated cities show the biggest impacts. There was little difference in results between growing versus declining cities.

    "We conclude that natives with less education take longer to adjust to the arrival of immigrants in their local labor market than do natives with more education," Wozniak says. "These effects are more pronounced in smaller, more isolated communities, from where it would be more difficult and expensive for less skilled natives to relocate."...

    1. Re:H-1bs Drive Out Skilled But Not Unskilled by Belial6 · · Score: 2

      The study found that when job pressures increase, the more mobile of society who are being pressured move to greener pastures while those who are less mobile and not being pressured don't move? Amazing! It almost sounds like people don't want to be out of work.

    2. Re:H-1bs Drive Out Skilled But Not Unskilled by rundgong · · Score: 1

      If we assume that the immigrants moving in drive down the wages for the native high skilled workers, then this is not surprising.

      The high skilled workers can move some place else and make more money.

      The low skilled workers won't really be better off if they move, since the immigrants moving in are not competing for their jobs. And if they make minimum wage they have zero chance of having their wage reduced by people moving in to do it for less money.

    3. Re:H-1bs Drive Out Skilled But Not Unskilled by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Are you actually claiming that a little town in Idaho that has 100 skilled jobs will generate 110 new skilled jobs in a reasonable time frame if 100 new skilled immigrant workers move into the town? You should immediately apply at the DOL. You could obviously turn our nation's current unemployment problems around within the month.

    4. Re:H-1bs Drive Out Skilled But Not Unskilled by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Having met a lot of people that talk like you and believe it, I actually don't know if you are a troll or a racist. Am I getting a woosh and missing it?

    5. Re:H-1bs Drive Out Skilled But Not Unskilled by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      So, you are serious then?

  12. There's a Few More Factors at Work by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Don't misinterpret this, I am against H-1B as well but you're missing two pieces of the puzzle that are, unfortunately, heartless as well. One is that when you remove a geek or nerd from their regular environment they often have nothing but their work and hobbies on the side. Make them a foreigner in America and some of them will practically live in their office cube instead of going home to stare blankly at foreign (to them) television. If you're lucky, they'll have a hard time making new friends and have less conflicts outside of work.

    Most of the comp sci classes I took were filled to the gills, and the program I got into in college was so impacted that I had to go in on another major and switch after the fact.

    Right but the top ten percent of your classes is still only ten percent of that. The companies that are arguing for more H-1B visas are licking their lips at countries that have a top ten percent they can still tap. The government likes it because it equates to a brain drain with the added benefit that the really smart ones actually get to stay. "The cream of the crop" doesn't just apply to American masses and I'm sure these H-1B employees help them toward their diversity and EEO goals.

    The willingness to work for less is just icing on the cake. The reason Microsoft is railing for more H-1B visas is simple: they win as far as they can tell. What critics might be correct about though, is that this is being used to learn how Americans do business and then move these workers back to the foreign country and lobby for outsourcing after mimicking their American counterparts. This is evident in stats like this:

    In 2006, these [outsourcing] firms collectively were issued 19,512 of the 65,000 H-1B visas granted, with 4 outsourcing firms among the top 5 receivers of H-1B visas. These are Infosys, Satyam Computer Services, Tata Consultancy Services, and Wipro Technologies. Critics have argued that granting H-1B visas to these outsourcing firms is not the real intent of the H-1B Visa program.

    So, even worse for American workers and unemployment is that it could eventually lead to even more off-shoring of work.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:There's a Few More Factors at Work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right but the top ten percent of your classes is still only ten percent of that. The companies that are arguing for more H-1B visas are licking their lips at countries that have a top ten percent they can still tap.

      In other words, companies want top talent but they don't want to pay for it. Not surprising, really. Who can blame them? Why would they cut into profits when they don't have to?

    2. Re:There's a Few More Factors at Work by Alien+Being · · Score: 1

      And in addition to all that, the H1B people's residence in the U.S. depends on their employers sponsorship. They are indentured and we are forced to play at that level. They are scabs.

    3. Re:There's a Few More Factors at Work by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But government doesn't have to sponsor that.

      There is *no* reason that Government has to be cheerleader of multinational corporations. I know that most people almost take it as a given, silent assumption these days, but if a corporation is doing something bad for the country there is no need for government to encourage it, and that is what is happening with H1-Bs and our tax code right now. Hell.. if a corporation is doing something absolutely harmful, government can END that corporation. Most people seem to believe in the back of their minds that corporations are somehow an idea handed down by God... they're not. They don't exist without government of some sort.

    4. Re:There's a Few More Factors at Work by aeortiz · · Score: 1

      Well, then, don't kick them out. I got my CS degree in the US under a scholarship that forced me to return to my home country. I am now working for a US company, but live in Latin America, and paid a lower salary than a comparable US citizen. If I had stayed in the States, I'd have probably started my own startup by now and be employing US citizens.

    5. Re:There's a Few More Factors at Work by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Part of that is that people take the short sighted view that giving in the use of human shields is a good idea. It gets argued that if you shut down Evil Puppy Stomping Inc. that Poor Widow Mary will lose her job, and Little Sebastian won't get his life saving medicine.

  13. Re: free market will resolve all human problems by beamin · · Score: 2

    Never mind the human wreckage along the way.

  14. Yeah! by bupton · · Score: 1

    Great! H1B's have been artificially pushing down my paycheck for decades. Every time wages go up a little in tech corporations go the the government and cry for more visas. Then some we get the speeches about how kids aren't going into tech. Duh!

  15. Re:Cant Americans compete? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

    Re: Then, why cant Americans compete with H1B's?
    You don't need that many anymore. A good engineer from a top university who likes to code and is an all round nice person can make most things you like in China.
    If not they have a security clearance and are mapping the globe or are passing on their skills to students around the world working out what they want to "do" in their 30's.
    They nothing to fear, wealthy families, nice cars, the best Phd's money can buy and a charm that is unique to their inner cliques.
    Their America is doing just fine. How is your Amercia going?

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Just like American businesses by pkbarbiedoll · · Score: 3, Insightful

    First they whine about having to pay too many taxes, and they complain about being oppressed by too many regulations. They want to pay no taxes and have next to no government interference in their profiteering.

    They want to pay zero taxes, yet they want the government to give them a strong military, police and justice system so their profits and interests are adequately protected. They want to pay nothing to the IRS, yet want a well designed and functioning infrastructure in which to operate.

    And now they want to create a false sense of emergency with regard to their work force, to hire complacent, affordable foreign workers via H1-B, rather than hire domestic workers some of whom may be unemployed by no fault of their own.

    Why is it we continue bending over backwards for these unpatriotic "people" again?

  17. Re: free market will resolve all human problems by Krneki · · Score: 1

    Expendable commodity.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
  18. HR bullshit by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    So H.R. are either the laziest fuckers in the entire world or they are openly deceptive.

    Please... this is why all those yelling about "job killing regulations" are full of it. Our multinationals don't follow rules they don't want to follow because government has become their lapdog.

    1. Re:HR bullshit by jsepeta · · Score: 1

      HR is generally lazy and despicable, dishonest and immoral

      --
      Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  19. Re:Law of Supply and Demand by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    Isn't there always a shortage of slave labor?

  20. Re:Why 65000? by CriminalNerd · · Score: 2

    It's the government overhead.

  21. Jobs for Americans? by mark_reh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    CEOs of tech companies don't want to pay taxes or decent wages and benefits and want a large pool of educated people to hire from. They have a two part strategy: (1) work deals to avoid paying taxes thus screwing Americans out of a decent education (California is a great example), and resulting in "not enough qualified applicants",which justifies (2) expanding the H1B visa program.

    H1B visa workers are essentially slaves. They have to accept whatever pay and working conditions they are given because if they don't like either they have to go back where they came from. It's perfect for tech employers. The extra 65000 slaves per year coming into the US drives down the wages and benefits for American workers who have to compete against people coming from 3rd world hell-holes.

    I used to be an engineer and worked for HP, TI, Motorola and a couple other companies. I've seen how the companies conspire to fix wages and benefits and I've seen and known several H1B slaves. I saw the writing on the wall several years ago and went back to school and became a dentist. Engineering is a dead end in the US. If you're in school for engineering now I'd start thinking about doing something else.

    1. Re:Jobs for Americans? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Low wage state?

      Texas?

      Texas is a HUGE scam brah.

    2. Re:Jobs for Americans? by Eravnrekaree · · Score: 1

      I think you are on the money here. The US has plenty of people already to fill these tech jobs and it has educational systems it can develop to do it. What is actually happening as well is that this is basically destroying US society. if anything we should zero-line the immigration quota and develop our own talent and capabilities. This will alleviate our unemployment issued and rebuild our middle class. The immigration is also bad for countries these immigrants leave, where their skills are needed in their home countries. The "brain drain".

      Secondly,I think we need to stop making the US unrecocognisable. The US is a mature country and does not need immigration, nor do we owe anything to these immigrants. They need to go back to their home countries and fix their own countries problems, and stop coming here.

    3. Re:Jobs for Americans? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      The trick is to be better than average (be one of the "go-to" guys)
      I used to believe that being better than average was going to always make me be in demand, and I also at one time made close to the $200k mark. Unfortunately, I learned the hard way that when the crap hits the fan, better than average is not in demand at all. In fact, the better you are, the lower your desirability. They want bare minimum that can get the job done, pay as low as possible and pray to whatever god is listening that something doesn't go wrong that their worker drone doesn't know how to handle.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  22. Surprised it has not run out yet. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Insightful
    A few years back, all the 65000 visas ran out in just a few hours. I am surprised visas were available till Nov last year and it still has not run out yet this year. I am sure there are multiple causes for it. One could be that the economy is not generating that many jobs. Another could be that the internet connections have improved to the point where it is possible to do the work in India.

    Also many young Indians no longer want to work in USA. Almost all the popular entertainment is now available in USA unlike the situation some 10 years ago. All the TV channels of all the languages are available either via satellite or via internet streaming. Cricket clubs are popping up everywhere and cricket channels are available from UK and Australia too. Vegetarianism support has increased tremendously over the last decade. Technically the life of a fresh immigrant Indian is much easier now than it was when were coming in, the early 1990s. But the biggest problem is the domestic chores. In India labor is so cheap, these people usually employ a maid and possibly a cook. Back then when I was earning 200$ a month as a government scientist I was spending 10$ a month on a maid. (All seven days a week, scrub the cement floor with wet rags and disinfectant, do the dishes, do the laundry and clean the bathrooms). So they don't do any household chores and consider cleaning the bathroom beneath their dignity. So now USA has lost its luster for the younger generation of India.

    It is a pity. They don't know what they are missing. They are highly misinformed about America. They think India is going to be the super power in 20 years. They have absolutely no idea of the depth of the strength of America and the time it would take to build a society like America. Of course it would take just a few decades to undo it. But to build it, it would take a few centuries. They don't know that.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Surprised it has not run out yet. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      I was willing to pay 5% of my salary for the maid. You pay that much you will get decent maids.

      The only reason that the US has stayed a superpower for so long was because you were attractive as a place to live in for the best brains in the world. Now not so much I think.

      I went to IIT for BTech and IISc for ME. Let me tell you. This is the hubris I was talking about. You have absolutely no idea of what made America a super power, and you have a highly inflated valuation of yourself.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  23. Re:IT.slashdot? by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    What is the difference in this case?

    HR is being manipulative. It doesn't matter if you are talking I.T., chem careers, engineering careers, or whatever. There are H1B people working in *journalism* for Christ's sake. This is our corporate overlords manipulating the numbers and the law, plain and simple.

  24. There you go! BINGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you've been unemployed for months and have nothing to show for that time, you're probably not somebody I want to hire.

    And everyone makes that assumption. There is this Lemming mentality that if others aren't hiring that guy then there's something wrong with him.

    BTW, I have all of the Visual Studio Express versions - C#, C++, Web. NetBeans, eclipse, Qt Developer, and of course Emacs.

    No one has even attempted to interview me to actually ask what I think about those environments. In other words I was never even given a chance to tell them about the things I was doing.

    After a couple of years and a recriuter saying that was basically unemployable, I smelled the coffee and just gave up.

    Have fun getting those H-1Bs and dealing with the tech worker "shortage" - you and people like you created it. Now live with it.

    1. Re:There you go! BINGO! by localman57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're screaming at the wrong guy, dude. We hire a ton of people who've been out of work. As I said, we bring them in for interviews. Even after we've seen their resume that says they've been out of work for months. You've apparently had two years off to pursue your dream programming assignment. I've been laid off; I know what it's like to have lots of free time and no disposable income. But that's the great thing about being a computer geek. You already have a computer, and many development environments are free. Hell, McDonalds will give you the electricity and wi-fi for the price of a cup of coffee. And you get the cup of coffee.

      So, I'll pose the same question to you... In the last two years, what have you accomplished? What non-profit did you help with their IT needs? What open-source software did you contribute to? What project did you begin in the hopes that it will be the next big thing?

      Your problem may be your attitude, not your skills.

    2. Re:There you go! BINGO! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, I'll pose the same question to you... In the last two years, what have you accomplished? What non-profit did you help with their IT needs? What open-source software did you contribute to? What project did you begin in the hopes that it will be the next big thing?

      Your problem may be your attitude, not your skills.

      No, the problem is with the attitudes like this one. When a person is unemployed, the time they have on the unemployment time is not a fixed item. They could get employed tomorrow, the next year or two, or never.

      Who's going to commit to an open source project, or any commitment whatsoever when you're actively looking for a job? Oh, your Open Source code is due tomorrow, but I have 3 job interviews and 2 tech tests [hoops] to take [jump through]. What now? Yay! I got hired, but wait, I now have a new job AND another software commitment.

      Job hunting IS a full-time job.

      Your problem may be your attitude, thinking that workers are mindless robots. I wouldn't want to work for someone like you.

    3. Re:There you go! BINGO! by vlm · · Score: 1

      your Open Source code is due tomorrow

      As someone who's been "in this", or at least in the periphery, for about 20 years, what does this mean?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:There you go! BINGO! by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Job hunting IS a full-time job.

      Work smarter, not harder. You could spend 8 hours a day, 40 hours a week, writing cover letters and poring over the same job ads, in a search you already know is fruitless, that only gets less likely to succeed as your tech skills and training continue to stagnate.

      Or, you could spend 2 hours a day doing that, and 6 hours a day working on your portfolio, some small demo programs that completely separate you from the 90% of applicants who have absolutely nothing to show that they can write a program at all. And then once you have a demo program or three, devote that 6 hours a day to learning something new, which will increase your chances of getting an interview in the first place.

      Your argument that committing to an open-source project will somehow reduce your chances of finding a job is ridiculous. Have you ever worked on an open-source project? If it's burdensome, you can just stop! Hell, if you tell your fellow contributors that you're stopping because you've got a job interview, chances are they'll wish you good luck and be surprised somebody actually said something instead of just disappearing. And really, nobody is going to give even the slightest shit unless you disappear for a week or more. I don't know what kind of interviews you go to, but the extent of my preparation is to make sure I have my outfit picked out and get to bed early the night before. Doesn't exactly eat into free time. And if they do give more than the slightest shit, it's because you're an extremely valuable member of the team, in which case trust me, you will have no problem finding employment, and you're still not obligated to continue working on it even if it's just because you'd rather play videogames, let alone because it's impacting your ability to feed yourself.

      I really don't understand this attitude of "what I'm doing isn't working, so everything should change to make what I'm doing work" instead of just changing what you're doing. And these crazy justifications you make up, do you actually think nobody is going to recognize just how far you're stretching?

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    5. Re:There you go! BINGO! by localman57 · · Score: 1

      This is a valid point, and one I had trouble explaining to my wife when I was laid off. The fact is, 90% of the useful job-hunting work can be done in about 2 hours after you get up. Check the job boards--again--then rewrite and reorganize your resume / cover letter again for whatever's new, to highlight what they think would be most relevant. After that, you have to decide how to spend the next 15 hours. Google more, make cold calls, send physical copies, etc. But investment in yourself so that you can add to the alphabet soup of Acronyms on your resume (which is what the filters look for) is also good, and should become more important if you've been unsucessful in the first few months.

      Also, all you young kids out there, take note. You need to be saving money. You need to have a war chest available, so that you really can spend a year off of work without becoming destitute, assuming you scrimp by on cereal and ramen noodles like you did in college. If you have an associate's degree, have a plan to get a bachelors. If you have a bachelor's get a masters. If you have a masters, pursue certifications. When you grow up and have a family, don't live a lifestyle that requires you to maintain 100% of your current income over 100% of the next 10 years. Even if this recession didn't get you, the next one may.

    6. Re:There you go! BINGO! by localman57 · · Score: 1

      +1. You're dead on. I actually wrote the same thing about that 2 hours a day a couple of posts down, before I did a refresh of this page and saw your comment.

    7. Re:There you go! BINGO! by localman57 · · Score: 1

      Some of what we do here is embedded systems, BTW. We had one guy who came in who had made his own flash-drive out of a microchip PIC and an EEPROM. It only held 1 MB of data, but it was more than enough to store a PDF of his resume. Less than $10 worth of parts, including a fabbed PCB with his name on it. It wasn't much more than a reference design with regard to hardware, but demonstrated initiative, and a good helping of "The Knack" which is much harder to find than a particular technology skill.

    8. Re:There you go! BINGO! by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It means that you have made a commitment to other people. That they are relying on you to finish your part of a job you committed to so that they can do their part. There are plenty of projects that make a point to tell users that they should have no expectations. There are other projects that take a much more professional approach, even if the work is being done for free.

  25. Re:It's not all black and white by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    Worst troll ever.

    There is no such thing as a reputable multinational any more. Especially not Microsoft of Amazon. I like Google, but they probably fall in the same boat now that "do no evil" is out the window.

  26. NObama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is why everyone needs to vote Romney, he will keep the job stealing immigrants OUT.

  27. don't have the basic knowledge as CS it not IT by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    and you need to look at the way you do screening and look at people who did not go to college / went to a tech school as well.

    1. Re:don't have the basic knowledge as CS it not IT by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      That is a point that often gets missed also. The skills needed to do 90% of IT work has dropped in the last 20 years, yet the number of employers that demand a degree has risen.

  28. "The goal is not to find a qualified american" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As it says "Immigration attorneys from Cohen & Grigsby explains how they assist employers in running classified ads with the goal of NOT finding any qualified applicants, and the steps they go through to disqualify even the most qualified Americans in order to secure green cards for H-1b workers. See what Bush and Congress really mean by a "shortage of skilled U.S. workers." Microsoft, Oracle, Hewlett-Packard, and thousands of other companies are running fake ads in Sunday newspapers across the country each week.

    Here's a video of one of their conferences. It's pretty harsh.
    How to put out fake ads, how to find ways to disqualify qualified americans.

    Quote" The goal is not to find a qualified and interested worker"

    http://youtu.be/TCbFEgFajGU

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:"The goal is not to find a qualified american" by crazyjj · · Score: 2

      See what Bush and Congress really mean by a "shortage of skilled U.S. workers." Microsoft, Oracle, Hewlett-Packard, and thousands of other companies are running fake ads in Sunday newspapers across the country each week.

      The sad thing is the American university system is complicit in the scam too. A lot of colleges and universities continue to lure students into college (and often into deep student loan debt) by talking about all the great job opportunities available--citing all the same bullshit "worker shortage" figures that the corporations use to lie to Congress. Just the other day, I saw an ad for a local tech school that talked about "severe worker shortages" in tech fields, implying that if you got your degree from them the job offers would just be falling on you like mana from heaven. A lot of kids are getting themselves into debt right now because of this scam. And most of them are in for a very harsh reality check when they graduate.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    2. Re:"The goal is not to find a qualified american" by 228e2 · · Score: 1

      Ok, but would you even want to work for a company like that? That wastes money going out of their way to find cheaper talent? That just reeks of a place that pinches pennies left and right.

      You have a valid point against some of these company's structure, but places like this dont need to be in business.

      --
      Since when does being a Socialist mean 'someone who has a different opinion than me'?
    3. Re:"The goal is not to find a qualified american" by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Right, like Microsoft, IBM, and any other major united states corporation?

      There are plenty of people who could do the h1b work at microsoft.
      But they are not willing ot work under slave conditions (60 hours a week, every week) for 80% of the pay (and no pension or SSI obligations).

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  29. Re:Good god! by Dunbal · · Score: 1

    I agree. I recently visited the US (last month) for a friend's wedding. I was greeted in the hallway on the way to immigration by 3 large uniformed officials and one large and vicious looking black german sheperd, standing in the middle of the corridor so that everyone had to walk between them.

    Now part of me understands the need to try to control drug smuggling, etc. However the image is unmistakable - "you are arriving in a police state, we have the power, we're not afraid to use it and we are arrogant enough to flaunt it in your face". This is not the US I grew up in in the 1970's.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  30. H1B - not only for IT workers by Why+Login · · Score: 3
    Statistics show most of H1Bs are filed for IT jobs: http://www.myvisajobs.com/Reports/2012-H1B-Visa-Category.aspx?T=OC

    by large IT companies: http://www.myvisajobs.com/Reports/2012-H1B-Visa-Sponsor.aspx Guess what? H1B is the only reasonable route for educated people to immigrate legally to US (aside from marriage and family ties, and lottery.) Due to annual cap, that is mostly taken by large IT companies, other folks are out of luck. I went to school for 10 years in US, got doctorate degree, and can't just open my own clinic and practice. I am not taking anybody else's job - I'll create jobs. But current immigration system does not allow that, unless you are rich right out of school and can invest hundreds of thousands of dollars in your business in order to get E2 visa. Even then, you cannot get residency and citizenship later, ever; only renew E2, if you are lucky. So, H1B is the only reasonable option: get hired, work for several years, and then get residency through permanent employment. However, most private clinics do not want to spend time and money to start H1B paperwork in April and wait until October for the worker to start working. Immigration system is ridiculous and that's why there are so many illegals. People just cannot get through the system even when they try to do it legally.

  31. Re:Cant Americans compete? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

    Let them raise the standard of living in their own country rather than dragging ours down. It's not their America. They're foreigners.

  32. No unemployment for IT in the USA? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Awesome that all american Tech workers are employed and they had to import the rest because there are just none left in the USA...

    What? You mean this is not true?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  33. Client will know by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    There are ways around that. Obviously, a Jr. DBA isn't gonna be paid as much as a Sr. DBA. But who's to know if the guy classified as a Jr. DBA is doing work usually done by a Sr. DBA?

    The paying client eventually will. Forgetting the artificial labels of Sr or Jr, and focusing on the actual meaning behind them, a Jr-level person, however smart, will not perform the same as a senior. There is a limit to how much smarts can compensate for lack of hands-on experience, and this is true in all trades and professions.

    A poor chap at a Jr level of skills can be put (nominally or officially) into a Sr-level positions (with all Sr-level responsibilities while having a Jr-level pay rate.) At worse, this person will botch the job. At best, he/she will deliver but at a lower rate of productivity.

    For a Jr-level person, it is always a good opportunity, and if she/he is smart, the experience will be more valuable than anything else. But in general, it is not a good thing for the employee and the employer. The unfortunate situation is that the cost of operations, the actual ROI of things in software is typically hidden or not amenable to easy analysis and book keeping.

    If the actual cost of doing things this way were apparent, clients wouldn't be so willing to cut corners this way. So make no mistake, a client (or his bottom line) will know when a Jr-level person is shoved into Sr-level shoes (in general detrimental to both parties.)

    1. Re:Client will know by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 2

      I think you're missing the point. The point is experienced Sr. level H1B workers are sometimes classified as Jr. level employees in order to pay them less.

    2. Re:Client will know by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Forgetting the artificial labels of Sr or Jr, and focusing on the actual meaning behind them, a Jr-level person, however smart, will not perform the same as a senior

      A Sr level worker labeled and paid as a Jr level worker can do the work of a Sr level worker, which is what the GP was saying.

    3. Re:Client will know by rollingcalf · · Score: 1

      I believe the GP was talking about the opposite -- an H1B worker with Sr-level skills placed into a (nominally) Jr-level position so the company can justify the low salary to the government. But in reality, they have Sr-level skills and do the work of a Sr-level person.

      --
      ---------
      There is inferior bacteria on the interior of your posterior.
    4. Re:Client will know by zidium · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... ON here on a visa, amiright?

      --
      Slashdot Valentines Beta Massacre: iT WORKED! The boycotts killed Beta!!
    5. Re:Client will know by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... ON here on a visa, amiright?

      Err, no. US citizen. Nice try at stereotyping as a replacement for logical arguments.

  34. i can haz teh reading comprehenX0r by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    H-1B is a scam by which white collar companies (not blue collar, because they aren't cool enough) can fire American workers and then replace them with foreign workers who are so happy to get to the States that they will work for $10,000 less per year. (There are laws against this kind of wage fuckery. They work the same as speed laws in Saudi Arabia: No one cares to obey or enforce them. The "shortage" of workers is a lie manufactured by Oracle, Microsoft, etc. in order to cut costs. Most of the comp sci classes I took were filled to the gills, and the program I got into in college was so impacted that I had to go in on another major and switch after the fact. It's like that in lots of places.

    Fuck all this H-1B nonsense, and fuck all the liars and misinformed idiots who think we are just gagging for foreign labor.

    We aren't gagging for foreign labor. Larry Ellison and Bill Gates are gagging for foreign labor because they can be paid less.

    Right - it's the fault of all those brown people who dare to compete with your incompetent, lazy, fueled-by-an-overgrown-sense-of entitlement fat ass.

    How did you come to that from HunsV's post (the post you are replying to)? Either you have been dying for a long time to have an opportunity to write that retort, or your reading comprehension skills are severely lacking.

  35. Re:Cant Americans compete? by bzipitidoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Belief in slavery, that's why.

    I've encountered many who really believe slaves make better workers. This includes the slaves. "I owe, I owe, it's off to work I go" is practically the national motto of the US. They don't call it slavery of course. They call it commitment, reliability and stability. They believe people must be pushed hard, and will do their best when they are in "do or die" situations, there's a gun pointing at their heads, their necks' are on the chopping blocks and the ax is ready to fall. Even better when they have volunteered. "Ability to work in high pressure environment" is a popular and sought after soft skill. They believe this so strongly that they put a higher priority on their ability to get and maintain holds over a job candidate than the abilities and skills they're seeking. Being financially responsible counts against you! They want you set up so that you're in a world of hurt if you lose your job. This is why the US does not have sane health care spending. Relieving employers of the burden of paying for and managing a health care program is seemingly one of the most business friendly things government could do. Yet business opposed it. Why? Employers like having holds over employees, and health benefits make a good one.

    Ever had a boss observe that you haven't bought a new car? And this despite the fact that your current car works fine? I have, twice, and my mother once. Why is the boss so interested in your car? No one else cares. One of these bosses explained it, saying that because I wasn't making car payments, I could afford to leave my job and this was bad! At another job, the phrase "flight risk" was used to refer to employees who could afford to leave their jobs. At still another job, a fellow employee told me that he was a better employee than I because he had to have the job in order to afford his crushingly high house payments (he paid $500,000 for a small house, in California, in 2003), and his wife and new baby daughter, whereas I was living in an apartment. He made sure everyone, especially management, knew how screwed he would be if he lost his job, and that he was willing to work long hours. Often, managers are also slaves, and tend to be jealous of peons who have freedoms they don't have. Had one manager who groaned theatrically about his massive credit card debt, but it was easy to see he was really kind of bragging about it. He even held a little pissing contest one day, asking everyone how much credit card debt we had. He "won" by "virtue" of having the most. I refused to answer, and this was met with hostility, and the suspicion that I must not have any, and jealousy.

    So of course H1Bs have massive advantages over the natives.

    --
    Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
  36. It NEVER makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The H1B is the *temporary* visa, the one they hire for one company then kick the person out after 5 years. If he really was that good and paid above average, then he wouldn't be on the H1B.

    It's there pure and simple to increase supply of programmers and thus reduce the cost of programmers to companies like Microsoft. Sometimes it's just there to train them up in the US, then ship them abroad back to cheaper countries.

    BTW, USA now imports more IT goods and services than it exports, so this H1B visa system did exactly what was expected of it. Happy Republicans? You brought it in, you fight to keep it in place, you voted the Republicans in, you suffer the consequences.

    1. Re:It NEVER makes sense by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The H1B is the *temporary* visa, the one they hire for one company then kick the person out after 5 years

      H1-B is a "dual intent" visa, which lets people working on it apply for green card while they work without being kicked out of the country. For many people holding it, it's their first step towards citizenship.

      . If he really was that good and paid above average, then he wouldn't be on the H1B.

      Then what would he be on, pray tell?

      "Paid above average", by the way, is a requirement to hire an H1-B worker.

      It's there pure and simple to increase supply of programmers and thus reduce the cost of programmers to companies like Microsoft. Sometimes it's just there to train them up in the US, then ship them abroad back to cheaper countries.

      If it reduces the cost of programmers to Microsoft, then why Microsoft urges every H1-B employee working for them to apply for a green card?

  37. Immigration increases the demand for skilled IT by argoff · · Score: 1

    For decades I have heard fear mongering about immigrants taking away IT jobs, and without fail just the opposite has been true, every time. In fact, what usually happens is that a bunch of cheap immigrants end up working for a start-up, a certain percentile of those start-ups that wouldn't have existed otherwise make it big, and then they hire 10000 engineers driving demand for IT talent through the roof, and pushing demand for even more immigrants. While I keep hearing these stories that the immigrants are going to push me out of a job, just the opposite has happened to the extreme. Talented people from a low freedom and low capital environment end up moving to a high capital high freedom environment, and creating wealth that never existed before - a lot of wealth.

    In truth, software and most IT is global. But notice how things like Linux flourish in silicon valley the most, even though they can afford MS windows a lot easier than the 3rd world. That's because when you mix freedom with capital, it creates growth.

    1. Re:Immigration increases the demand for skilled IT by headhot · · Score: 1

      I have been in many start-ups, inside and outside of the valley. I have never seen an H1-B in a start up. They are the domain of large corps like Microsoft or IBM.

    2. Re:Immigration increases the demand for skilled IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For decades I have heard fear mongering about immigrants taking away IT jobs, and without fail just the opposite has been true, every time.

      Funny, for the past decade I have seen more and more Indians in engineering who most certainly ARE taking jobs away from me
      in contract engineering.
      I know of a few companies who are now almost ALL Indian, the US workers take thier work and repair and or fix their stuff to get it out the door.
      I also have been interviewed for jobs, at a MUCH lower than market rate (as I found out at the end of the interview), so they could justify hiring H1B workers.
      The latest trend I have been seeing is that more and more engineering recruiters are now Indian.

      Engineering has been dumbed down to the lowest level possible to enable the work to be sent overseas.
      I insist that the previous posters has it right: engineering is a dead end career in the US.
      The multinational corporations and our own government have killed it.

  38. Furniture movers by LeepII · · Score: 1

    I wonder how many of those visa's are for "furniture movers" like in 2001 and Urban Moving Systems. The US gave 200 visas to Urban Moving Systems.

  39. Good by headhot · · Score: 1

    The H1-B visa program is BS. Its point is to provide sub market price labor to large companies. Every one of those jobs could be filled by americans, but they would cost more.

  40. Re:It's not all black and white by headhot · · Score: 1

    Microsoft was caught rehanded laying off americans and replacing them directly with H1-Bs.

  41. Re:Cant Americans compete? by magamiako1 · · Score: 1

    This is absolutely brilliant and so true it's unbelievable.

    Honestly, I let it be known that I am a flight risk by having little to no debt. I make them damn well sure that I am choosing to work there and can leave at any given time if I wanted to. For the employers that keep you around you tend to get better treatment.

  42. Switch to H1-Bv6 then by bourdux · · Score: 1

    They should have seen this coming. How come the H1-Bv6 is not ready yet?

  43. Private Industry IS doing fine by AbrasiveCat · · Score: 1

    Is it would appear that President Obama was right. If the H1B visas are being snapped up quickly this year, and if it isn't local, state, and fed government causing it by their layoffs, then private industry must be doing fine, partially caused by hiring the cheapest available workers it can and so making improved profits. Isn't this how Bain Capital worked? (Don't tell the media, it would confuse them.)

  44. Land is more important: Kick the corps out by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    The corporations are essentially giving away US territory to high fertility rate peoples.

    This is war.

    Kick the corporations out. Yes, kick the entire Fortune 1000 out to India if that's what it takes. Let India have them.

    The US got along just fine before the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965 which, it was promised by the cosponsors, would not change US demography.

  45. "Unique" job descriptions cover most favoritism by davidwr · · Score: 2

    If I want to hire Hispanic programmers over non-Hispanics without running afoul of anti-discrimination laws, I make sure the job has a legitimate Spanish-language or other qualification that is over-represented among Hispanics. Maybe I make one of the job duties "Other duties: Applicant will be responsible for occasional 3rd-level support for Latin American clients" or some other legitimate duty. After all, SOMEONE has to provide occasional 3rd-level support for Latin American clients, and it's best if that person speaks the language.

    Such "custom job descriptions" can also be used to custom-tailor a job for a candidate in what used to be called the "good ol' boy network" - such as the nephew of my wife's cousin's good friend.

    The trick for managers and companies that do this is to 1) not let HR know what you, the manager, are doing, 2) don't over-do it, either as a manager or as a company. Sunshine, either by HR or by a government audit, tends to expose such shenanigans.

    The hard part of those who "lose out" to such favoritism is that it's not only difficult to prove, it's difficult to get someone who has any authority to do something about it to take an interest unless the evidence is overwhelming.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  46. Americans ARE willing to be treated as slaves by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If they weren't, there would be no American graduate students.

    *cue rim-shot*

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  47. The H1B program should be eliminated by E_Ron.Eous · · Score: 1

    period.

  48. Large carat diamond shortage as well???? by zildgulf · · Score: 1

    If you say there is a skilled IT worker shortage then why don't you say there is a large carat diamond shortage?

    I say there is no skilled IT worker shortage, there is only a shortage of IT workers that can do senior level work for junior or mid level wages.

    Isn't it strange that when there is no shortage of qualified IT workers that are desperate for work wages go down but when there is a shortage of these professionals average wages refuse to go up. Even in this so-called IT worker shortage the average wages in most IT specialties have not returned to where they were twelve years ago adjusted for inflation.

    Just like large carat diamonds if you really wanted the best IT workers you should have to pay for it instead of moaning to Uncle Sam to bail you out. Any company that advertises that they will pay any American or Green Card IT worker 50-70% more than the average wage will have resumes sent to them by the palate. Pay them double the average and you can siphon off the best and most committed and hardest working workers from other companies.

    1. Re:Large carat diamond shortage as well???? by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

      And there is also a lack of entry / junior level work, so that companies can develop the people they need.

      Kids comming out of College need some spit and polish.

  49. Price Controls by ZombieBraintrust · · Score: 2

    And the big problem with H1B visas is that they artificially DRIVE DOWN the average salary

    I would say it is the reverse. Limiting imigration into this country artificially drives up the average salary. It isn't natural for someone in country a to be paid less than someone in country b when they are doing the same work. The fact that you feal entitled to have your salary subsidized by the goverment is ridiculous. Your not entitled to the handout the goverement is giving you.

    1. Re:Price Controls by misexistentialist · · Score: 2

      The citizens that formed their government aren't entitled to the benefits of their own fucking country, but it's "natural" for some strangers to come in and extract dollars from the economy so they can go home rich in their own currency? Maybe you should stop exploiting our hospitality and earn your way by working in a brothel for sex tourists.

    2. Re:Price Controls by shiftless · · Score: 1

      The citizens that formed their government aren't entitled to the benefits of their own fucking country

      Wait, what? Do you happen to personally know someone who helped found this country, and is now being "robbed" of the benefits they are "entitled" to? Please tell me who this is. I must learn the secrets to their longevity.

    3. Re:Price Controls by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      " It isn't natural for someone in country a to be paid less than someone in country b when they are doing the same work."

      Natural? The hell it isn't. Nothing more natural in the world.

  50. The bigotry on this thread is awe inspiring. by rogerz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is nothing to distinguish the primary sentiments expressed here from the hatred of European Jews, Italians, Irish, West-Africans, etc. that have been voiced by the most backward and unthinking bigots throughout American history. Each of the individuals seeking work here has - in our founders' terms - an inalienable right to pursue their happiness in any peaceful manner they choose.

    When they ask for a job at a given wage, they are infringing no one else's rights - noone has a "right" to a job at a higher wage than the employer is willing to pay. It is only by dropping this context that someone can complain about the so-called "unfair" competition imposed by other individual job seekers, no matter where they come from. There is no un-bigoted reason to prefer that someone born in America gets a given job over someone born elsewhere.

    Yes, the H-1B visa program should be abolished - in favor of absolutely free immigration and job-seeking by any non-criminal from any place in the world. This is America's promise, as expressed eloquently on the Statue of Liberty. Where has that spirit gone?

    --
    If humans are mostly water, and beer is mostly water, then humans must be mostly beer.
    1. Re:The bigotry on this thread is awe inspiring. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      That quote on the French statue was written by some poet dreamer, not by a general or statesman. A country is by definition exclusive, and if the American people were to become suicidal enough to open the borders, within 24 hours the USA would no longer exist.

    2. Re:The bigotry on this thread is awe inspiring. by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Our country started with open borders in case you didn't know that.

    3. Re:The bigotry on this thread is awe inspiring. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      A country is by definition exclusive, and if the American people were to become suicidal enough to open the borders, within 24 hours the USA would no longer exist.

      American people were "suicidal enough to open the borders" for a good half of their history. Up until 1870s or so, there were no visas to bother with to come into the country, you could work wherever the hell you wanted and for however much you felt to be fair, and you got your citizenship after residing in one state for a year and paying taxes there.

    4. Re:The bigotry on this thread is awe inspiring. by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Ask the Native Americans how that worked out for them

  51. Parent Insightful? by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    If these H1B education visas are sending people to the same schools we go to, then what's the difference? Are 95% of these H1B candidates bad too?

    H1B is a work visa, not an education visa. You cannot go to school on a H1B Visa.

    God knows why parent post was Moderated Insightful?

  52. They come halfway across the globe... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1, Troll

    Most of the Indians wants to be here in the USA to fuck white chicks. At least most of their conversation revolves about it. And we are talking about engineering and CS students here.

    I suggest you to read this:

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2442898&cid=37491808

    In order to get a student visa you need to have a "statement of sufficient funds" a.k.a. proof that you have a trust fund.

    Which group is more motivated? A trust fund kid from some Asian country or someone domestic student who rely on financial aid?

    Disclaimer: I am Asian-American.

    1. Re:They come halfway across the globe... by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      In order to get a student visa you need to have a "statement of sufficient funds" a.k.a. proof that you have a trust fund.

      It is true that "every" international student is required to show that each of them would have enough money to pay for the tuition & living expense while studying in the U.S. However, your post is imposing your stereotyping while you do not completely know what "international" students are.

      There are some students who are from rich families coming into this country to go to school. These students are likely to be what you met at work. They usually are bad apple for their families. That's why their family send them here to the U.S. However, there are also those who come here with their own intelligence, diligence, sweat and tear, and they want to make their lives better. These people are more motivated than many domestic students.

      In conclusion, stop stereotyping and try to look around more. Just because you have one bad experience, it should not mean the whole world to you. Have you ever heard of "one bad apple spoils the whole bunch"? Yes, a bad apple could ruin all others, but that doesn't mean all others are bad apples.

  53. Land of the free by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

    We could be the land of the free. Our national anthem contains those words but we ignore them. Any productive person should be able to come to this country and live and work in peace. Instead we use the power of law not to protect rights but to take them away via immigration restrictions. I used to think racism and discrimination were dieing out but obviously those traits are alive and well (and seemingly growing).

    1. Re:Land of the free by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      It isn't racism. You want it to be, but that is you. If anything, it is nationalism. Nationalism and racism are two totally different things. There is a heavy correlation between the two, but they are not a causal relationship.

      It is a little like having your brother dating. When he tells you that he just proposed to the love of his life, and the woman smiles and says that she wants to spend the rest of her life with him, have children and build a strong successful family, you wish him the best.

      When the woman tells you that she is with him because in a few years she can divorce him and take half of everything he has and move back in with her high school sweetheart. That half of what he has is more than she and her real love could earn on their own. You wave him off. You point out how bad of an idea it is. If the woman happens to be a different race than you, it doesn't make you a racist.

    2. Re:Land of the free by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

      Call it what you will but whatever you call it, it's evil. "Anti-other" laws are contrary to liberty, justice and fairness.

    3. Re:Land of the free by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Why would a nationalist be opposed to his nation growing in number?

  54. Re:Why 65000? by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 1

    65535

  55. How uncanny is that? by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

    Cowboy Neal has now been replaced by Cowboy Robot!

    --
    http://www.acetonestudio.com
  56. Re:Cant Americans compete? by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    Dont be a jackass, jackass.

  57. Problem solved by ThatsNotPudding · · Score: 1

    And I bet those same farmers would have raised hell if there had been a crackdown on illegals, complaining to the government that they "just couldn't find workers" (at $4-$5 and hour, of course).

    Yeah, the farmers in the former Confederate states ran into this problem when they passed all the new anti-brown laws: no more cheap, compliant labor! Luckily, the very robust and connected for-profit Prison Industry quickly stepped in a provided a very similar substitute. Bonus: most of them are black - just like the good ole' days!

  58. No backfire. No downsides. by Weezul · · Score: 1

    It won't lower wages, it'll raise them. Switzerland has amongst the highest wages in the world, far above any nearby country, except probably Luxembourg.

    It won't reduce immigration either, it'll increase it. Switzerland has a ridiculously huge immigrant population. Geneva is 80% foreign born, most French, German, and U.K. It turns out "just pay em' more" is simpler than hiring lawyers for the visa paperwork, so more Swiss companies just hire abroad. Law are scary. Salaries are simply bookkeeping.

    Also, the extra immigration won't reduce work for natives. If companies spend more on salaries, their employees spend more, voila economic activity, increasing employment.

    Americans would never attempt this solution though because America's politicians are completely owned by corporation. Switzerland has plenty of corruption too of course, just nothing like the U.S. Also, Switzerland has a much stronger democratic tradition than the U.S., such as referenda being common and not crazy like in CA or CO.

    Fun Fact : Swiss Rosti is what American hash browns, but the Swiss rosti always beats Waffle house. lol

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  59. High Unemployment/Underemployment by BigDaveyL · · Score: 1

    As I've stated here on /., why do we need to import labour when we have high levels of Unemployment/Underemployment?

  60. US Immigration Policy by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Guess what? H1B is the only reasonable route for educated people to immigrate legally to US (aside from marriage and family ties, and lottery.)

    Even if that was true, so what?

    I went to school for 10 years in US, got doctorate degree, and can't just open my own clinic and practice. I am not taking anybody else's job - I'll create jobs. But current immigration system does not allow that, unless you are rich right out of school and can invest hundreds of thousands of dollars in your business in order to get E2 visa. Even then, you cannot get residency and citizenship later, ever; only renew E2, if you are lucky.

    That's because the visa you are talking is the non-immigrant E-2 treaty investor visa; as a strictly non-immigrant visa you can't use it to immigrate. OTOH, if you want to immigrate as an investor in your own business in the US, you want the immigrant E-5 visa, which does allow you to immigrate.

    So, H1B is the only reasonable option: get hired, work for several years, and then get residency through permanent employment.

    Actually, its not, even ignoring the immigrant E-5. As a holder of a graduate degree (or a bachelor's degree and five or more years of experience, or a person with special skills in the sciences, arts, or business) you can get a job offer and qualify, by way of that, for an immigrant E-2 visa (which, despite the similar identifier, is completely unrelated to the non-immigrant E-2 treaty investor visa). With different levels of skill or qualifications, one might qualify through employment and background for other employment based (E-1 through E-4) immigrant visas, as well.

    Immigration system is ridiculous and that's why there are so many illegals. People just cannot get through the system even when they try to do it legally.

    While this is true, it has nothing to do with the supposed problems you point to with it not being easy enough to get an H-1B (or employment- or investment-based immigrant visa in general.) Illegal immigrants don't, in the largest part, come from the places where you would see more H-1Bs if it was a little easier to get them, they come from the same places where there is the largest backlogs in the family-based immigration categories -- and often are exactly the same people that can't come because of those backlogs.

    If you want to eliminate the illegal immigration that results from poor management of the legal immigration system -- and thereby allow immigration enforcement to simply address the individually undesirable immigrants that we really want to keep out -- then:
    1. Eliminate per-country caps in the existing, family-based immigration visa categories (keeping the global caps in each category, with a single global lottery when applicants exceed the global cap) -- this better aligns supply with demand, and makes it so you don't create an enormous backlog for legal immigration from the country where there is the largest pool of qualified applicants who want to immigrate (for instance, the 15+ year backlogs in the F-1, F-2B, F-3, and F-4 categories from Mexico.)
    2. Allow excess immigration in the existing, limited family-based immigration categories for applicants willing to pay an additional substantial (different for each visa category, and higher for categories that are less preferred) fee for the privilege of bypassing the limitation & lottery process (and, therefore, any potential backlog) -- the principle of limiting immigration in these categories is limit the social cost of accommodating a larger immigrant population, but in practice this creates a large pool of people willing to pay money (which ultimately ends up supporting dangerous criminal enterprises) to get into the country simply because of the backlog created by the limits; rather than driving these resources into bypassing the limits and then expending public funds to combat it, this change would drive those

  61. Welcome by shiftless · · Score: 1

    On behalf of the "real" America: welcome. We need more people like you.

    Sincerely,

    An above-average American who is also sick and tired of the mediocrity and entitlement.

  62. Re:LOL by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

    Because they cannot CHOOSE to not be employed.

    Its like CHOOSING to eat.

  63. The reason congress rolls over to industry on H1B is very simple -

    companies will just outsource or move offshore if they don't, which is far worse for the US economy (and tax revenues) than H1Bs.

  64. Shortage in some areas of the country by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    There are shortages in some areas of the country. For instance in Wisconsin there is a severe shortage of skilled Java developers. I know my company has been looking for 3-4 senior level Java developers and that is just the start. We have had to resort to interviewing people who are right out of college and having to accept it will take them 1-2 years to get "up to speed". I know a couple people we interviewed claimed to have all kinds of Java experience on their resume, but when interviewed they knew about as much as the kids right out of college or less. Right now we are having to use about 75 developers across 3 continents for a huge project we are working on. Why all over the globe. Simple we truly can't find skilled Java developers in the state. We are looking outside the state - but the company won't pay for relocation so that hurts trying to get people in from other states but many won't come to Wisconsin, or won't come if there is no relocation involved. I think if unemployed IT folks -REALLY- want a job - they need to start looking in places they may not have thought about before. Also make big pushes for telecommuting. I know our CIO came to the realization that telecommuting for some positions in IT is doable. So they are working out how they will handle it. They realize that not -all- developers -have- to be "on site". Heck they are using folks in India - so that proves it.

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
    1. Re:Shortage in some areas of the country by spiffmastercow · · Score: 1

      There are shortages in some areas of the country. For instance in Wisconsin there is a severe shortage of skilled Java developers. I know my company has been looking for 3-4 senior level Java developers and that is just the start. We have had to resort to interviewing people who are right out of college and having to accept it will take them 1-2 years to get "up to speed". I know a couple people we interviewed claimed to have all kinds of Java experience on their resume, but when interviewed they knew about as much as the kids right out of college or less. Right now we are having to use about 75 developers across 3 continents for a huge project we are working on. Why all over the globe. Simple we truly can't find skilled Java developers in the state. We are looking outside the state - but the company won't pay for relocation so that hurts trying to get people in from other states but many won't come to Wisconsin, or won't come if there is no relocation involved. I think if unemployed IT folks -REALLY- want a job - they need to start looking in places they may not have thought about before. Also make big pushes for telecommuting. I know our CIO came to the realization that telecommuting for some positions in IT is doable. So they are working out how they will handle it. They realize that not -all- developers -have- to be "on site". Heck they are using folks in India - so that proves it.

      Have you thought about hiring outside the pool of people who have spent their career specializing in java? I work in a .net shop, but we often hire people with primarily java or c++ experience because it's much easier to get a good developer and have them learn the dev environment than it is to take someone who knows the dev environment and teach them to code.

    2. Re:Shortage in some areas of the country by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

      Now that's a good thought. I'll present that idea to my manager and try that route. If you have a seasoned developer - if they know a couple languages - they can learn another....

      --
      The Truth is a Virus!!!
  65. Re:It's not all black and white by Belial6 · · Score: 1

    "Don't be evil".

    "Do no evil" is pretty much impossible for even your average Joe, much less a company that must follow regulations that just might require it.

  66. Re:"The goal is not to find a qualified americans" by gabrieltss · · Score: 1

    This has been going on since the early 90's. I remember a guy from the local labor department telling me about this. He even showed me the EXACT job adds that were posted that were SPECIFICALLY for "disqualifying" American IT folks. He told me they will post the job requirement based on a SPECIFIC H1-B's resume, skills, experience etc... almost guaranteeing they won't find a comparable American worker. IF an American DOES apply they find something else to disqualify them for. It's all a scam to drive down wages and sell out this country...

    --
    The Truth is a Virus!!!
  67. industry lobby groups by P-niiice · · Score: 1

    I love how Industry lobby groups never want to fix American education instead of hiring foreigners. I wonder why......

  68. Re:Cant Americans compete? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Then, why cant Americans compete with H1B's?Americans are used to a higher standard of living. We like to live in houses with our families. At least in my case, when I and a number of my colleagues were replaced by H1B workers, the 6 H1Bs in question all lived in the same 2 bedroom apartment (which is illegal in some states, and merely against the rules in many other complexes), and drove a single car which was definitely not capable of seating 6 people. I also suspect they did not have a valid drivers license and that state did not recognize Indian driver's licenses.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  69. Here's an idea by TigerTime · · Score: 1

    Quit giving tens of thousands of student loans to crap majors where people can't get jobs. Make students decide to enroll in an engineering program because that's one of the few programs they can get a loan for.

    Bottom line is student loans need to be based off of supply and demand. If we are going to be short 224,000 jobs in the IT industry, and we have students that can't get jobs, then something is wrong with the college process.

  70. How many Americans are denied jobs in India? by hillbluffer · · Score: 1

    Just a question for those of you who think it's racist to deny H1B visas.... How many Americans who try to apply for the jobs in India that are being outsourced to that country are being denied work visas in India? Answers?

  71. form email I got today... by jsepeta · · Score: 1

    "The response to the Server Administrator position has been overwhelming!"

    so this _is_ a big fucking scam

    --
    Remember kids, if you're not paying for the service, YOU ARE THE PRODUCT THAT IS BEING SOLD.
  72. Re:Law of Supply and Demand by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Isn't there always a shortage of slave labor?
    Yes, in a society where some people get paid for their work, it becomes next to impossible to keep slaves. They keep running off to the paying jobs.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  73. Re:I think this thing is a little backward. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    The number should be based off of how big the company is. Basically a ratio of local workers to foreign. What the ratio is to be is entirely up to the government based on some basic analysis of a whole bunch of large, medium and small companies. (maybe even make different ratios for each company size-type)
    Hopefully this would eliminate some of the H1b sweatshops where out of 30 or 40 consultants, 100% of them are on H1B, and even though they are termed employees and not contractors (because H1b can't be used for contractors), they somehow don't get paid when they are on the bench.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  74. Re:Cant Americans compete? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I totally think this debt slavery is true. Local residents have first or second mortgages, car payments, student loans and child's tuition payments. Someone's gotta keep the interest payments going so the banks get rich. That's part of buying into the US system. Foreign nationals paid into a different educational system (often it's free) and so their college debt is usually zero and they have more than one master's degree. They live in rental housing and move a lot so they can work in gigs in different cities or states. Their playground is the entire nation. We are usually bound to our hometowns and communities because we build a life here for the long term.

    None of the H1B workers at my company contribute to a 401k, many opt out of health benefits and waive dental and insurance, so they can keep all the cash. They bring all the money to their home country during yearly vacations so they can spend it on their families, get married, remodel their parents home, buy land or cars. They effectively export the American dream overseas. This is a ton of money being exported outside our ecosystem and none of it comes back here.

    I've also seen "job stealing" first hand. I thought it was a complete myth until the day my company started laying people off before a merger. One girl who was on an F1 /CPT visa begged her way back into a job after saying she'd be kicked out of the country due to an expiring date. The founder was pretty naive and reopened a seat for her after laying off most of the team. I feel bad because two members of my team were let go and were US citizens with much more skill and seniority. The problem I had with this picture is that they should have allowed the US citizens have a shot at their job but the company went with the person with the visa. There were simply no complications to firing a US citizen. In other words, the girl's visa issue became the US citizen's problem since they were "easier" to fire.

    So now, this girl gets into the new company and is on months-long contract. I think she's already formulating her next story about why she "can't" be laid off -- either it will be a passport or visa issue, or she can get pregnant and start planning her maternity leave, effectively making it hard to fire her. This would displace me and another coworker, also a US citizen, because we're "easie targetsr" to fire than someone with visa complications which require legal expertise.

    Am I way off base here? Who would have thought that the least experienced, most junior and low paid worker could eventually offset not one but two American jobs. She's now competing on my level because post-merger the reporting structure has changed so she's making new alliances with the other company managers and will probably throw me under a bus at first chance.

    I was heavily pro-immigration but after having experienced its effects first hand I've reversed my opinion about it. Even Naturalized citizens and Legal Residents are unfairly pushed out in the same manner.

  75. I'd say it drives down wages. by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Limiting immigration should drive down wages. Consider each worker as an individual business. Now, if you say that businesses Juan, Mick, John, Bill, and Mary cannot trade the product of their labor freely in any country, and businesses HP, IBM, M$, and Oracle can all trade the product of that same labor freely, then the trade is going to happen. But businesses HP, IBM, M$, and Oracle are going to take a cut of Juan, Mick, John, Bill, and Mary's product as they trade it to the restricted areas.

    And HP, IBM, M$, and Oracle will make a profit selling Juan's product in Mary's hometown, and they will make a profit selling Mary's product in Juan's hometown.

    And thus, the wages of Juan and Mary are going to nosedive.

    Same goes for Bill, John, and the others.

    Which you are seeing.

    Now, if Juan secretly goes and sells his product illegally, he'll profit from that -- but drive John, Mary, Bill, and the others even deeper in the hole. So you'll also see an empowerment of criminal behavior, mostly because of an abandonment of the concept of Rule of Law [which means that laws are like traffic guides, not designed to benefit one and hurt another.]

    All of which you are seeing.

    Read Friederich Hayak, Road to Serfdom.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  76. What is legal immigration? by Dartheee · · Score: 1

    Up until the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1965, Africans and Asians were forbidden from immigrating to the US. This immigration act(which is still followed) allows only a fixed quota for immigration from each country (China and India are banned from entering through this unless they can claim asylum). Now, the only legal method for an Indian is to either marry an american or get H1B sponsorship and hold on to it for 12 years to get a greencard. When I hear people talking about how they hate illegal immigrants and how people should immigrate here legally like their grandparents did, they conveniently forget that all their grandparents had to do was to board a ship with a passport and land at Ellis Island where they were given a greencard upon arrival(Many didn't even bring an ID card, hence the pejorative "Without Papers"). The only requirement back then was that you had to be a Caucasian. The entire debate on H1B seems to be based on the fact that employers are able to pay $80,000 for foreign worker rather than pay $120,000 to hire a native born american, And most people who are strongly against H1B seem to be unemployed software coders. I'm amazed that they'd rather remain unemployed than work for the same salary as a foreigner($80,000 is way more than what many of the taxpayers you mooch off of earn). To conclude, its really sad to see the extent people would stoop just to rationalize their race based prejudice. Almost all ethnic Indians(Including me) learn and speak English, assimilate very successfully with the American mainstream, support free market capitalism, work hard and believe in individual liberties and Republicanism, yet we still are hated by a section of american population because it pokes holes in their theory of dark skin equaling inferior intelligence. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income

  77. Re:LOL by shiftless · · Score: 1

    You've never heard of being self employed, I take it?