Slashdot Mirror


WD Builds High-Capacity, Helium-Filled HDDs

Lucas123 writes "Western Digital subsidiary HGST today announced that after 10 years of development it is preparing to release 3.5-in data center-class HDDs that are hermetically sealed with helium inside. The helium reduces drag and wind turbulence created by the spinning platters, all but eliminating track misregistration that has become a major issue to increasing drive density in recent years. Because of that, HGST will be able to add two more platters along with increasing the tracks per inch, which results in a 40% capacity increase. The drives will also use 23% less power because of the reduction of friction on the spindle. HGST said the new seven-platter helium drives will weigh 29% less per terabyte of capacity that today's five-platter drives. In other words, a seven-platter helium disk will weigh 690 grams, the same as today's five-platter drives."

252 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Why not a vacuum by suso · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those of you wondering why they don't just use a vacuum inside the drive. Hard drive heads ride on a cusion of air (or in this case, a gas of some kind) so that they don't crash against the drive.

    1. Re:Why not a vacuum by suso · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I meant against the platter.

    2. Re:Why not a vacuum by xynopsis · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hard drive heads ride on a cusion of air (or in this case, a gas of some kind) so that they don't crash against the drive.

      Why a gas? Why not float it using an electromagnet instead?

    3. Re:Why not a vacuum by mrbester · · Score: 2

      Not sure if trolling...

      --
      "Wait. Something's happening. It's opening up! My God, it's full of apricots!"
    4. Re:Why not a vacuum by nschubach · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wouldn't that be like strapping an eraser to the end of your pencil so anything you write will be cushioned by the soft rubber?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    5. Re:Why not a vacuum by XiaoMing · · Score: 1

      Those of you wondering why they don't just use a vacuum inside the drive. Hard drive heads ride on a cusion of air (or in this case, a gas of some kind) so that they don't crash against the drive.

      If it's filled with helium, you can fill it to a pressure that's equal to environment (or at least really close).

      Try to picture the failure rates if an airtight seal holding back 1 atm of pressure vs. one that only has to deal with a tiny fraction of that.

    6. Re:Why not a vacuum by Pepebuho · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, this means that NOW I can submerge reliably the whole PC into Mineral Oil without fear of oil getting into the only moving part, the hard drive. Can't wait to try this out!

    7. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No. It would be more akin to filling your car with clowns before driving it, instead of bothering with seatbelt or airbags. Which in fact sounds like a pretty damn good idea!

    8. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not only that, but after the helium migrates through the pores in the metal housing, the heads will crash! Physically programmed disk death!

    9. Re:Why not a vacuum by Galestar · · Score: 2

      Magnets, how to they work?

      --
      AccountKiller
    10. Re:Why not a vacuum by EdIII · · Score: 2

      Man, if you were fishing for Wooshes......

    11. Re:Why not a vacuum by angelbar · · Score: 1

      4 fooled, one confused... well done !!

      --
      -no sig today-
    12. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, that was the fucking point of the joke.

    13. Re:Why not a vacuum by cplusplus · · Score: 2

      Successful Troll was successful. :)

      --
      "False hope is why we'll never run out of natural resources!" - Lewis Black
    14. Re:Why not a vacuum by Luckyo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      +1 troll moderation is needed here.

    15. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I'm pretty sure the correct response was "WOOSH"

    16. Re:Why not a vacuum by somersault · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately no.. newly registered poster is retarded.

      "lol"

      --
      which is totally what she said
    17. Re:Why not a vacuum by somersault · · Score: 1

      Oops, thought you were replying to a different comment. I hope this batch of retarded isn't contagious.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    18. Re:Why not a vacuum by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Schrodinger's troll?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    19. Re:Why not a vacuum by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry, scrote. There are plenty of 'tards out there living really kick-ass lives. My first wife was 'tarded. She's a pilot now.

    20. Re:Why not a vacuum by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Not only that, but after the helium migrates through the pores in the metal housing, the heads will crash! Physically programmed disk death!"

      Well, it's still better than their past efforts. The hydrogen-filled drives worked just great, until they got to New Jersey. Then they exploded.

    21. Re:Why not a vacuum by jiteo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Technically, it's "woosh" in lower case, because the joke was riding on a thin cushion of air, and therefore not making much noise.

    22. Re:Why not a vacuum by retep · · Score: 1

      It's better than that: sure helium can leak out of your hard drive enclosure, but it's also the only think that can leak into the enclosure as well. Helium is present in the atmosphere in small quantities, so the pressure in the hard drive will track atmospheric, albeit very slowly, yet still maintain a nearly pure helium atmosphere.

    23. Re:Why not a vacuum by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Because that would give off electromagnetic radiation lol. That and magnets and hard drive platters don't get along.

      Explain that to the "voice coil" electromagnet servo-mechanism that they use to position the heads from side to side along the platter.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    24. Re:Why not a vacuum by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      With these new helium filled drives, the "whoosh" would be in a high-pitched, squeaky voice.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    25. Re:Why not a vacuum by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I was taken to New Jersey I would explode too.

      --
      Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
    26. Re:Why not a vacuum by funkboy · · Score: 1

      Well, this means that NOW I can submerge reliably the whole PC into Mineral Oil without fear of oil getting into the only moving part, the hard drive. Can't wait to try this out!

      Ever heard of SSDs?

    27. Re:Why not a vacuum by sd4f · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the size and power of the voice coil magnet inside the hdd? That was my source of neodymium magnets before they became quite commonplace.

    28. Re:Why not a vacuum by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's lower case, but "weeeesh". They're using helium, now. Didn't you read the article?

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    29. Re:Why not a vacuum by tibit · · Score: 1

      That's assuming that the seals are only permeable to helium. When the seal breaks, it'll of course be permeable to anything. A hermetic enclosure means completely gas tight, helium included. I have no idea how they deal with wires. Glass frits?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    30. Re:Why not a vacuum by tibit · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they designed their housing so that the helium will stay put. Alas, don't forget that such migration is a two-way street. If the pores are large enough for helium only, then the only thing that can migrate back is helium as well. Although the obvious problem will be that the partial pressure of Helium in our atmosphere is very low, and that partial pressure will equalize with internal pressure of the hard drive -- someone correct me if I'm wrong, please.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:Why not a vacuum by Calos · · Score: 1

      I always heard that as "scro," not "scrote." The natural progression of "bro."

      --
      I vote based on politicians' actions, unless contrary to my preconceptions. Often wrong, never uncertain. #iamthe99%
    32. Re:Why not a vacuum by swalve · · Score: 3, Informative

      They still float, just on a microscopic level.

    33. Re:Why not a vacuum by swalve · · Score: 1

      The opposed magnets on the voice coil kill almost all of the magnetic flux. And the platters are high coercivity.

    34. Re:Why not a vacuum by swalve · · Score: 1

      There is no steel in hard drives.

    35. Re:Why not a vacuum by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      actually, I came here to woosh for fishes.

      is this the wrong place for that, then?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    36. Re:Why not a vacuum by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      Glass frits?

      don't they serve that down in the south, for breakfast or something?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    37. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, this means that NOW I can submerge reliably the whole PC into Mineral Oil without fear of oil getting into the only moving part, the hard drive. Can't wait to try this out!

      What about your floppy drives?

    38. Re:Why not a vacuum by cdrudge · · Score: 1

      If the pores are large enough for helium only, then the only thing that can migrate back is helium as well.

      Good thing there aren't any elements smaller than He on the periodic chart. Er, wait a sec...

    39. Re:Why not a vacuum by ka9dgx · · Score: 2

      That was my second thought... right after "how are they going to keep the helium from leaking out?"

      Yes, we all know the data is stored magnetically, but the amount of lift required to keep a head spaced off a spinning disk shouldn't require much in terms of field strength, especially if things are fairly well balanced. It would be distributed over a large enough area that you wouldn't have to worry about erasing domains.

      Carbon fiber reinforced disks, in a vacuum, floating on a magnetic bearing, in a stack of 30 or so platters spinning at 1million rpm would be able to store a hell of a lot of power and data at the same time.

      Secure erase would be easy... just let the bearing crash. ;-)

    40. Re:Why not a vacuum by quenda · · Score: 2

      Aren't jokes supposed to resemble... you know, a joke?

      I'm sorry, but slashdot does not have a laugh track. We like it that way,

    41. Re:Why not a vacuum by hawk · · Score: 1

      >That was my second thought... right after "how are
      >they going to keep the helium from leaking out?"

      Sonics.

      The helium will cause the drive to rattle in a high squeaky tone, the harmonics of which will reflect back from the case, knocking the helium back in.

      hawk

    42. Re:Why not a vacuum by dargaud · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering why they didn't do that DECADES ago. Having used hard drives at 4000m altitude and seeing them fail after a month or so. What's so hard to sealing a small box ? If not helium, use nitrogen or even air at standard pressure so that they can be serviced by anyone. Not that anyone still services hard drives anyway.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    43. Re:Why not a vacuum by shiftless · · Score: 1

      No, we don't eat glass. I'm not sure how that rumor got started. Y'all folks will apparently believe anything...

    44. Re:Why not a vacuum by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Aren't jokes supposed to resemble... you know, a joke?

      Hm... I give up; are jokes supposed to resemble a joke?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    45. Re:Why not a vacuum by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      When you crack open the hard disk case, it dies. Or not.

    46. Re:Why not a vacuum by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Helium is a tiny atom and almost as bad as hydrogen at diffusing through pretty well anything. It will get out, but with the right design the timescale may be too long to worry about at room temperature. Definitions of hermetic seals are not going to help since those ions, atoms and molecules can't read the dictionary and magic is not going to keep them in or out.

    47. Re:Why not a vacuum by dbIII · · Score: 1

      It does escape via diffusion, but it does it slowly at room temperature.

    48. Re:Why not a vacuum by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You can't be sure the head has not crashed into the disk, without opening the drive.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    49. Re:Why not a vacuum by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2

      No. The mu metal around those magnets does that. That stuff is awesome. It "bends" the low frequency EM fields. If you ever have a harddisk magnet with the mu metal bracket you can see it for yourself: the magnet side will stick to ferrometals, the mu metal side doesn't.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    50. Re:Why not a vacuum by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      With magic! Or in case of a ssd it's charge in a floating gate mosfet.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    51. Re:Why not a vacuum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The gas in the drive also transports heat away to the case, where the system cooling blows it out of the back. A Vacuum is a pretty good thermal insulator, and therefore, not what you want in a hard drive.

    52. Re:Why not a vacuum by Trax3001BBS · · Score: 1

      Those of you wondering why they don't just use a vacuum inside the drive. Hard drive heads ride on a cusion of air (or in this case, a gas of some kind) so that they don't crash against the drive.

      What's the name of that effect (cushion of air crated by the heads) called?

      Many years on and off I've tried to remember the name of it.

      There used to be large 8-12" dia (?) floppy disk (large), who's edges would sag until
      they rotated, the heads would then float above the medium due to this air flow effect (phenomenon).
      As opposed to a normal floppy disk where the heads made contact with the surface.

      This system and the floppies had the same name as this air flow effect, I think it's also
      the name of the person who explained it in the first place, and why it's so hard to google/find.

      Any Clue? Not trying to put anyone on the spot, I'd just really like to know.

    53. Re:Why not a vacuum by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I have a set of four sets of HDD magnets stuck to my desk, which is made from two baker's racks.

      If you try to stick the back of a magnet to the desk, you fail. But if you put two together and stick the result (backs out) to the desk, you succeed.

      Doesn't this seem more like monopolar magnets than Mu Metal? Or is it just an issue of field strength?

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    54. Re:Why not a vacuum by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I don't know if it really will get out. The case is cast and it's sealed with adhesives, and presumably it's going to be right around atmospheric pressure at sea level, there's no need to have it actually pressurized and that would probably defeat the purpose anyway - adding more gas is counterproductive when you're trying to reduce drag.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    55. Re:Why not a vacuum by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Good luck trying to get a 1 terabyte SSD. But you raise an interesting question: Can an SSD dive in insulating oil without causing long-term damage to it?

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    56. Re:Why not a vacuum by muldjord · · Score: 1

      Which also makes you wonder if these drives will ever hit the market now that the employees have helium tanks readily available.

    57. Re:Why not a vacuum by tibit · · Score: 1

      I do understand that definitions don't mean much, but presumably metallurgy and material science has ways of dealing with such problems -- again, timescale and temperature is what matters. Room temperature is of course a fantasy for hard drives, I'd conservatively do any gas leakage estimations at +70C surface temperature for the cover -- then you can be pretty damn sure you won't have a big recall in a couple of years :)

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    58. Re:Why not a vacuum by damien_kane · · Score: 2

      Can an SSD dive in insulating oil without causing long-term damage to it?

      No more than the ICs on the motherboard or video card you submerged

    59. Re:Why not a vacuum by operagost · · Score: 1

      Not really. Have you smelled a clown lately?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    60. Re:Why not a vacuum by rwise2112 · · Score: 3, Funny

      With these new helium filled drives, the "whoosh" would be in a high-pitched, squeaky voice.

      And... How will my MP3s sound on one of these drives?

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    61. Re:Why not a vacuum by skids · · Score: 1

      Yes, these just float away if you forget to secure them in their bays. Huge improvement over the NJ debacle.

    62. Re:Why not a vacuum by shaitand · · Score: 2

      They can't permanently contain helium so it naturally leaks out of the drives over time and guarantees they eventually break. If they made magnetic bearings and vacuum work the drives would last too long.

    63. Re:Why not a vacuum by shaitand · · Score: 1

      If you are a drive manufacturer why would you want to prevent the helium from leaking as opposed to slowing it so it breaks after the warranty period?

      If you reduce the air friction within the drive you reduce mechanical failure rates and that eats into future purchases. If you can build in a failure mechanism like this you are set.

    64. Re:Why not a vacuum by shaitand · · Score: 1

      Nothing is completely helium tight.

    65. Re:Why not a vacuum by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "It will get out, but with the right design the timescale may be too long to worry about at room temperature."

      Built in failure mechanism. They only need or want it to last longer than the warranty period.

    66. Re:Why not a vacuum by kumanopuusan · · Score: 1

      strapping an eraser to the end of your pencil

      You should probably be more specific. Putting erasers on the end of pencils isn't as outlandish as you seem to think.

      --
      Use of the words "good", "bad" or "evil" is almost invariably the result of oversimplification.
    67. Re:Why not a vacuum by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Using a gas is self-regulating... Using mechanical or electrical means to position the heads means you need the most ridiculous precision ever.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    68. Re:Why not a vacuum by kmoser · · Score: 1

      How about the power switch?

    69. Re:Why not a vacuum by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, but slashdot does not have a laugh track. We like it that way,

      No way. And what about those +5 Funnies?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    70. Re:Why not a vacuum by doccus · · Score: 1

      Those of you wondering why they don't just use a vacuum inside the drive. Hard drive heads ride on a cusion of air (or in this case, a gas of some kind) so that they don't crash against the drive.

      In fact, that WAS my first thought! Thanks for clearing that up... Now lets see how many other /.ers bothered to read your comment, and ask the same question ;-)

    71. Re:Why not a vacuum by BoothbyTCD · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure heat flow issues are also part of the reason. Vacuum is the best possible insulator, whereas helium is excellent at transferring heat away from the spindle.

      --
      snig
    72. Re:Why not a vacuum by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Diffusion.

    73. Re:Why not a vacuum by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I do understand that definitions don't mean much, but presumably metallurgy and material science has ways of dealing with such problems

      Yes, make the wall thicker so it takes longer for the gas to diffuse out. The stuff is going to get out eventually, but if it's going to take 100 years at operating temperatures to lose enough gas to prevent it operating then it doesn't really matter. Currently the bearings are not going to last anywhere near that on normal drives even if the things are turned off (the lubricant breaks down over time - I'm not sure if it's oxidation or by some other means).

    74. Re:Why not a vacuum by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes yes, it has been explained repeatedly elsewhere in this thread. It has also been surmised that you could reasonably make an enclosure which would remain essentially full of hydrogen until the heat death of the universe using current technology; there are very thin helium barriers now including membranes and coatings. Until someone shows me some math that suggests that this is an actual problem, I'm going to assume that the engineers who created these things are smarter than a committee of slashdotters.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    75. Re:Why not a vacuum by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Er, that is, an enclosure which would remain essentially full of helium. I understand why you wouldn't use hydrogen, embrittlement and even more storage problems.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  2. Disaster by darkpixel2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just imagine something like this with a huge 'WD' logo on the side inside your computer.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    1. Re:Disaster by netdigger · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes yes, you have to watch out for that non explosive helium.

    2. Re:Disaster by ZankerH · · Score: 1

      Helium is an inert gas. You're thinking about hydrogen gas.

    3. Re:Disaster by Desler · · Score: 1

      Well we will look out for it when they release HDDs with hydrogen in them.

    4. Re:Disaster by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Funny

      *facepalm*
      *hands over nerd card*

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    5. Re:Disaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Argon walks into a bar. An alarm goes off and the bartender yells "Hey, we don't serve your kind here!" Argon, of course, didn't react.

    6. Re:Disaster by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you good-naturedly admitted your facepalm moment.

      You may keep your card, good sir.

    7. Re:Disaster by Richy_T · · Score: 2

      Oh the humanity(-student level understanding of science)

    8. Re:Disaster by lordofthechia · · Score: 1
      --
      Georgia Tech, the leader in Chia(tm) technology.
    9. Re:Disaster by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Hydrogen is only flammable in the presence of Oxygen.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    10. Re:Disaster by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      You can oxidise hydrogen with some other gasses as well. Chlorine+hydrogen mix is very volatile and flammable for example.

    11. Re:Disaster by suutar · · Score: 1

      but is it still really "oxidation"?

    12. Re:Disaster by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Hydrochlorides, huh? Freebase your hard drive...

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Disaster by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes. In chemists' jargon, "oxidation" is the process of giving away electrons. The process is named after the most common electron recipient, oxygen, but lots of molecules can be oxidizers.

      Or to put it another way, if I mix hydrogen with oxygen, and you mix it with chlorine, and we both add a spark, we'll get pretty much the same effect. Either way, there'll be a tremendous bang, and neither of us will have any eyebrows. Of course, after a few deep breaths, your nose might start bleeding as hydrochloric acid eats your mucous membranes, but that's a separate issue.

    14. Re:Disaster by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Well, let's hope they don't put any chlorine in your hard disk, then...

      H2 + Cl2 = 2HCl reaction requires light or high temperature as well, IIRC... but the whole thing as silly as it would never be put in the drive in the first place.

    15. Re:Disaster by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's a controlled environment. Not a home where someone can decide it's a good plan to shoot the harddisk with a shotgun (for data destruction purposes).

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    16. Re:Disaster by Pope · · Score: 1

      Man, I'm just not following these storylines on "Breaking Bad" anymore...

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    17. Re:Disaster by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

      Oh the humanity!!!

    18. Re:Disaster by suutar · · Score: 1

      Thanks! It's been too long since my chem classes...

  3. Headline: by mhajicek · · Score: 2

    New Helium filled drives weigh less!

    1. Re:Headline: by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      If they make them bigger, with more helium, they'll float!

  4. This explains it! by billakay · · Score: 2

    So that is where all the Helium has gone...

    1. Re:This explains it! by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Informative

      In case anyone didn't get that, there's a worldwide helium shortage at the moment.

    2. Re:This explains it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, here in Nebraska we don't care about any so-called helium shortage!!

      http://journalstar.com/sports/huskers/football/what-helium-shortage-football-tradition-is-back/article_3dff8c13-7c52-5477-9eab-76cfbba06f7e.html

    3. Re:This explains it! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Likely to be a permanent condition.

      Helium is light enough that it doesn't persist very well in the atmosphere(unlike the heavier noble gasses, that you can just distill out if the price gets high enough to pay for the energy needed), and it is only replenished quite slowly by alpha decay of assorted radioactives in the crust.

      The only significant source is natural gas wells in proximity to suitable minerals over geologic time and equipped to capture the helium when the product is brought to the surface.

    4. Re:This explains it! by RicktheBrick · · Score: 2

      If there is a shortage why are they still selling helium filled balloons at dollar tree for a dollar? All those balloons will eventually pop and the helium will be lost into outer space.

    5. Re:This explains it! by glueball · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Liquid Helium sell for $8.00/L on the wholesale quantity market.
      It is still very, very cheap.

      Last fill on my MRI machine was 800L due to cold head failure. Lucky me I have a service policy, but still, that's a big use of Helium. I would not worry about your Helium balloon.

      Bill
       

    6. Re:This explains it! by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      Gas replacements were my second favorite service behind replacing the radiation source in PET scanners. For the gas, you get to look really important dragging around your case of Victorian-era looking tools and large gas cylinder, while the radiation source meant you had a great excusing for working in shorts and a t-shirt.

    7. Re:This explains it! by mythosaz · · Score: 1

      Actually...

      A number of dollar stores now have significantly reduced their availability of helium balloons.

    8. Re:This explains it! by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      D'oh, I meant insulated cryo cylinder.

    9. Re:This explains it! by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

      I'd like to know where you are. Last place I saw around here that had helium, you had to book a week ahead to get access to a cylinder.

    10. Re:This explains it! by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      My dollar store switched to BYOH balloons. It takes a lot less space on the shelves, too.

    11. Re:This explains it! by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Likely to be a permanent condition."

      Well, you can thank the U.S. government for that.

      We used to have the world's largest helium supply, by far, in the U.S. Strategic Helium Reserve, until the government decided to do away with it just a few years ago.

      And now there is a shortage. Imagine that.

    12. Re:This explains it! by 0111+1110 · · Score: 1

      Jupiter has plenty of it--more than that planet's inhabitants will ever need. Looks like we may finally have a financial motive for space travel. We just have to hope we don't get attacked for stealing their gas.

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    13. Re:This explains it! by locopuyo · · Score: 1

      I clicked on the link hoping they were playing football with a helium filled ball. So disappointed.

    14. Re:This explains it! by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

      It's been going on for a while. Didn't you buy helium futures 5 years ago?

      --
      I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    15. Re:This explains it! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      where has all the helium gone,
      long time gassing;
      where has all the helium gone,
      long time, ago.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    16. Re:This explains it! by evanbd · · Score: 1

      You can distill helium out of the air. There's some left. The cost would be around 10x the cost of neon, though. And if you have to ask what neon costs...

      Actually, people do distill some helium out of the air. It comes out with the neon as "noncondensing gases" in the column. Those gases get sold to some buyers of neon, who don't mind some extra helium in the gas. Neon signs aren't too picky, iirc.

    17. Re:This explains it! by l00sr · · Score: 1

      Argh, a million times yes! Stupidity of stupidities!

    18. Re:This explains it! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, you get it when you nuke oil and Isreal is working on the solution.

    19. Re:This explains it! by manicb · · Score: 1

      Because humans are rubbish at accounting for sustainability; we only ever look at current availability. There'll always be someone who cares less that can undercut you.

  5. But the cost? by sandytaru · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this going to be cheaper than SSD? The price point for solid state finally reached where platter drives were about ten years ago (a dollar or less a gig) and I installed one on my system just last week as my OS drive. Also, are these going to be significantly faster than the standard five platter density drives? Frankly, weight only matters in tablets, phones, and laptops. I'm not aware of any crushing weight problems in the steel server racks...

    --
    Occasionally living proof of the Ballmer peak.
    1. Re:But the cost? by oji-sama · · Score: 1

      Drives with more platters in them usually have better price to storage capacity ratio. And the density can be increased. I would not be surprised if these were cheaper (relatively) than the current server HDDs. Probably not significantly faster though.

      --
      It is what it is.
    2. Re:But the cost? by Tough+Love · · Score: 3, Informative

      Is this going to be cheaper than SSD?

      Yes, of course. Only a tiny amount of helium is used.

      Also, are these going to be significantly faster than the standard five platter density drives?

      As usual for density increases, transfer rate goes up, seek time is unchanged. Moving disks even further into the role formerly occupied by tape. Maybe the reduced friction (= less heat) could make 10K drives more practical, improving seek time but probably also being a boutique product squeezed between SSD and 72k disks, and thus expensive.

      --
      When all you have is a hammer, every problem starts to look like a thumb.
    3. Re:But the cost? by vux984 · · Score: 1

      seek time is unchanged

      Reduced friction and reduced turbulence might enable higher seek times.

    4. Re:But the cost? by vux984 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reduced friction and reduced turbulence might enable higher seek times.

      By higher I meant better, which in the case of seek times is of course lower.

    5. Re:But the cost? by RubberDuckie · · Score: 1

      I'm not aware of any crushing weight problems in the steel server racks...

      For most server racks. probably not as there is a log of empty space in standard servers. Here at $WORK, we have a MAID array for archival storage. Since the drives in the unit only spin up (and get hot) when needed, the array contains many more drives than a standard disk array. This makes the unit quite heavy, and could overload the floor on some buildings. Luckily, this is on the first floor, so it won't come crashing through the ceiling.

    6. Re:But the cost? by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      Reduced friction and reduced turbulence might enable higher seek times.

      Slightly faster seek times as there's less, err, air resistance that the heads have to oppose. Unfortuantely, they added two platters which means the seek arm has nearly 40% more mass. More mass means more inertia, which means the heads are harder to start and stop quickly, which probably more than compensates for the reduction due to air resistance. It could seek *slower*, too.

    7. Re:But the cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Weight matters in the datacenter too... Drives are probably the densest component in a rack. A fully populated rack can easily weigh over 2000lbs (900KG for people who use a sane system of measurement). A well managed datacenter (and competent sysadmins) should include consideration of the structural load (on the building), point loads (particularly on raised floors), and weight in transit. After you've done a few datacenter moves, you begin to think of things like the weight limit on elevators, truck lift-gates, ramps leading to a raised-floor facility, etc.

    8. Re:But the cost? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      There's weight... and space and SATA connectors and power connectors, I always prefer my storage more compact. A 128GB SSD is fine but I'd gladly take a few 5TB HDDs to go with it.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:But the cost? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Funny

      Reduced friction and reduced turbulence might enable higher seek times.

      By higher I meant better, which in the case of seek times is of course lower.

      That's what she said.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    10. Re:But the cost? by BenJeremy · · Score: 1

      Is this going to be cheaper than SSD? The price point for solid state finally reached where platter drives were about ten years ago (a dollar or less a gig) and I installed one on my system just last week as my OS drive. Also, are these going to be significantly faster than the standard five platter density drives? Frankly, weight only matters in tablets, phones, and laptops. I'm not aware of any crushing weight problems in the steel server racks...

      I think the idea is that they're going to be making 4-5TB drives with it, and those aren't as cheap as run of the mill 1-3TB HDDs that we're used to.

      I'm guessing that they'll be selling to a crowd that values maximum storage size over price/GB.

      Actually, it sounds like 6TB drives. initially, these will be enterprise drives, but I'm sure there will be consumer drives avialable. Platter drives still compete with SSDs in the consumer marketplace, and they do this for volume (which reduces costs). The only problem is that as SSD capacities rise (even if the $/GB is still much higher than platter drives) within the usual consumer "Benchmark" pricing (i.e. $200 or less), platter drives HAVE to increase capacity and maintain sub-$200 pricing.

      The whole Thailand flood thing allowed platter drive vendors to breathe a bit after spending so much time at the low margin end fo the business, but it's gone on WAY TOO LONG. Now SSDs have started mainstreaming as boot drives on desktops and laptops. Platter drives are quickly being relegated to secondary storage status as slower data drives for consumers... Outside of enthusiasts, who needs much more than 500GB on a desktop or laptop? In another year, 500GB SSDs will be available for under $200 (that magic consumer price point), and only enthusiasts will be looking for bigger secondary drives to hold their games, music, movies and porn - and where will that leave platter vendors?

    11. Re:But the cost? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Is this going to be cheaper than SSD? The price point for solid state finally reached where platter drives were about ten years ago

      If you compare consumer SSD's to enterprise 15000 RPM HDD's then they are already at price parity, and by the middle of next year the enterprise SSD's will be at or better than parity with any 15000 RPM's.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    12. Re:But the cost? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      This makes the unit quite heavy, and could overload the floor on some buildings. Luckily, this is on the first floor, so it won't come crashing through the ceiling.

      Scruffy doesn't approve.

    13. Re:But the cost? by BCoates · · Score: 2

      Affordable SSDs are a year away but you have your time axis backwards.

      Price-point sized SSDs are more like $0.90/GB right now. The expensive intel 520s are $1.25/GB at 240 and 480 GB sizes.

      500GB for $200 isn't here yet but prices have been steadily crashing towards it for years.

    14. Re:But the cost? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Is this going to be cheaper than SSD?

      Yes, of course. Only a tiny amount of helium is used.

      Also, are these going to be significantly faster than the standard five platter density drives?

      As usual for density increases, transfer rate goes up, seek time is unchanged. Moving disks even further into the role formerly occupied by tape. Maybe the reduced friction (= less heat) could make 10K drives more practical, improving seek time but probably also being a boutique product squeezed between SSD and 72k disks, and thus expensive.

      But filled with helium, these drives are going to have decreased density.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    15. Re:But the cost? by tibit · · Score: 1

      That's trivial to compensate in the head actuator. Those actuators could provide way more actuating force for faster seeks, but performance is limited by turbulence (among other things).

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    16. Re:But the cost? by Z34107 · · Score: 1

      They don't "weigh" 900kg, they have 900kg of mass :P

      Oh? What does something with 900kg of mass weigh in your neck of the woods?

      In my country, where we use a sane unit of measure, it's about 2000 pounds.

      --
      DATABASE WOW WOW
    17. Re:But the cost? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Affordable SSDs are always a year away. Vendors aren't going to lower their prices until people stop buying the $2/GB ones. I have been waiting for SSD prices to drop for years now, but prices seem to be holding steady.

      What ? SSD prices have been crashing for 12 months now.

    18. Re:But the cost? by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Is this going to be cheaper than SSD? The price point for solid state finally reached where platter drives were about ten years ago (a dollar or less a gig) and I installed one on my system just last week as my OS drive. Also, are these going to be significantly faster than the standard five platter density drives? Frankly, weight only matters in tablets, phones, and laptops. I'm not aware of any crushing weight problems in the steel server racks...

      Dumbest up-modded post in the history of Slashdot?

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    19. Re:But the cost? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      About 8830N

    20. Re:But the cost? by Zenin · · Score: 1

      Your prices are old. There's a ton of drives already in the $0.50-0.70/GB range now, even after factoring in sales tax. Check newegg, tigerdirect.

      --
      My /. uid is better then your /. uid
    21. Re:But the cost? by shiftless · · Score: 1

      That's about 13TL7.2C erklons in my neck of the woods. You humans and your crazy measurement systems.

  6. Only one problem by wcrowe · · Score: 5, Funny

    These disks are great except when you replay audio files the vocalists sound like munchkins.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  7. Scarce(r) resource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What about the impending Helium shortage?

    http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/med-tech/why-is-there-a-helium-shortage-10031229

    1. Re:Scarce(r) resource by XiaoMing · · Score: 1

      What about the impending Helium shortage?

      http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/health/med-tech/why-is-there-a-helium-shortage-10031229

      This is a much bigger issue/concern for MRIs that are cooled by liquid helium (remember, liquid takes up 1000x LESS space than gas, think of how much helium is needed to fill one of those).

      The tiny amount of gaseous helium needed to create one of these hard-drives will probably cost much less than the amount of material saved (7-platter drive costing 50% less than a 4-platter one according to TFA).

    2. Re:Scarce(r) resource by angelbar · · Score: 1

      You got the last apple of earth on your hand with no means to cultivate... What you do?

      --
      -no sig today-
    3. Re:Scarce(r) resource by Jeremi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You got the last apple of earth on your hand with no means to cultivate... What you do?

      Reformat it and install Debian.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:Scarce(r) resource by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is we should store all our helium in hard drives before it all floats off into space...

    5. Re:Scarce(r) resource by Githaron · · Score: 1

      Partner up with someone who does have the means to cultivate it and make millions or even billions of dollars since you will have the only apple farm in the world?

    6. Re:Scarce(r) resource by Bengie · · Score: 1

      Liquid helium.. Zero friction :P

    7. Re:Scarce(r) resource by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Funnies aside, not a good idea. High purity hydrogen makes many metal alloys brittle. Helium works so well because it's ideal gas that doesn't chemically react with almost anything.

    8. Re:Scarce(r) resource by 0111+1110 · · Score: 2

      Then how about Argon, Krypton, or Neon?

      --
      Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    9. Re:Scarce(r) resource by camperdave · · Score: 4, Funny

      Funnies aside, not a good idea. High purity hydrogen makes many metal alloys brittle. Helium works so well because it's ideal gas that doesn't chemically react with almost anything.

      Then how about Argon, Krypton, or Neon?

      Nope. It doesn't react with any of those either.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:Scarce(r) resource by heypete · · Score: 1

      Those are heavier than helium, which likely defeats the purpose stated in the summary.

  8. Done 40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Helium was used as a lubricant in fixed head disk drives in the late 60's.
    They had to keep a tank of it attached since it is very difficult to keep it from leaking out.
    How, exactly, are they going to keep the Helium from leaking out?

    1. Re:Done 40 years ago by Desler · · Score: 1

      By sealing them. Did you think they wouldn't think of that?

    2. Re:Done 40 years ago by AwesomeMcgee · · Score: 2

      Fear: a terror level warning of paisley is on the side of each one permanently ensuring the helium will never risk leaving.

    3. Re:Done 40 years ago by xlsior · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that helium molecules are so small, they slowly leak out of pretty much any 'sealed' container?

    4. Re:Done 40 years ago by wierd_w · · Score: 3, Informative

      Good question. Helium atoms are so small that they can escape through tiny cracks between metal grain boundries in metals. Normal air does not. The only thing I can think is that they used some kind of penetrating sealant.

    5. Re:Done 40 years ago by FishTankX · · Score: 1

      My best guess is that they'll have a low pressure sensor and a refill valve. A good seal should be good for several years, and topping back up on helium should be pretty trivial.

      Helium is cheap. Atleast, in the quantities that would be used in hard disks. If each drive leaks a cubic inch per year, and you have 50,000 drives, you're probably looking at a 4000-6000$ recharge cost per year, just for the raw gas. Small price to pay for increased capacity and decreased volume per unit of capacity per disk.

    6. Re:Done 40 years ago by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Funny

      Perhaps they sealed the drives with more helium.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    7. Re:Done 40 years ago by Anubis+IV · · Score: 1

      How, exactly, are they going to keep the Helium from leaking out?

      Well, there was the whole thing about it being hermetically sealed...

      My guess is that they have this figured out.

    8. Re:Done 40 years ago by marcansoft · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What would replace the helium atoms? If the case is rigid, and the pressure inside is equal to atmospheric pressure, and air can't diffuse back in since O2 and N2 molecules are larger, I expect that pressure alone will heep the helium from leaking significantly.

    9. Re:Done 40 years ago by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      Heliumception?

    10. Re:Done 40 years ago by angelbar · · Score: 1

      People... need to borrow karma for this guy, please.

      --
      -no sig today-
    11. Re:Done 40 years ago by EdIII · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Small price to pay for increased capacity and decreased volume per unit of capacity per disk.

      Until it is all gone, or $10k for a recharge instead of $1.

      There is a world wide helium shortage and a bunch of morons administrating the reserves. Average person just does not know, and why would they? We have been wasting it in balloons for most people's lives.

      Barring a massive increase in technology, it is a completely nonrenewable resource. Unless you look at it in geological time frames, and even then, the planet only has so much.

      By the time I retire MRI machines might cost several more times to operate just because of the helium costs alone....

    12. Re:Done 40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, he's thinking of helium. Helium is monoatomic and hydrogen is diatomic. A single atom of helium is smaller and leaks more easily than a two-atom molecule of hydrogen. Helium is the most difficult gas to contain. It will seep through solid steel.

    13. Re:Done 40 years ago by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Fear: a terror level warning of paisley is on the side of each one permanently ensuring the helium will never risk leaving.

      Oh good... for a second I thought you said parsley.

    14. Re:Done 40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      Partial pressure From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

      Gases will always flow from a region of higher partial pressure to one of lower pressure; the larger this difference, the faster the flow.

      In other words, the O2 and N2 will have no effect on the H2 diffusing out.

    15. Re:Done 40 years ago by cyborg666 · · Score: 2

      Except that helium molecules are so small, they slowly leak out of pretty much any 'sealed' container?

      Doesn't something have to get in to fill the void? Otherwise there will be a vacuum left inside...

    16. Re:Done 40 years ago by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pressure in a sealed container is not constant, and gas does not pressurize uniformly.

      This means localized pressure fronts caused by the rotating platters will push molecules out, as will thermal expansion from drive activity.

      Over time, the pressure inside the drive will drop below that of ambient pressure. This will cause "air bearing" failure, and drive failure.

      (To better imagine this, imagine the spinning platter as a slingshot, pushing on the helium, and shoving it against the walls of the sealed enclosure. If this local pressure is greater than outside pressure, then the helium will be forced outside the enclosure. The energy of the plater displaces the equilibrium.)

    17. Re:Done 40 years ago by amorsen · · Score: 1

      MRI's have massive potential for recapturing the helium. Right now they just vent it to the air when it evaporates. If it was valuable, it would be captured in a bag and recycled.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    18. Re:Done 40 years ago by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Except that helium molecules are so small, they slowly leak out of pretty much any 'sealed' container?

      Doesn't something have to get in to fill the void? Otherwise there will be a vacuum left inside...

      Yes and No. The helium will leak out until the partial pressure of helium on both sides equalizes (ie, when as much helium diffuses in as diffuses out).

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    19. Re:Done 40 years ago by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      The containment of helium has to be only good enough relative to the expected service life of the hard disk, and the expected use.

      It's just another engineering parameter, whose optimization is done in consideration to other parameters.

      There is little utility in achieving a 25 year seal, if the drive is expected to be toast within 10 years.

      But that means that the drive couldn't be used for archival. Which is fine if that's not an expected use case.

      Anyway, if 50 years from now someone wants to retrieve something from one of these drives, they can perhaps go through the expense of re-filling it with helium.

    20. Re:Done 40 years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Pressure does not work that way. This is a standard thermodynamics brainteaser. The helium will diffuse out until the partial pressure inside equals the partial pressure outside (which is zero). The partial pressures of other gases on either side of the diffusion membrane are irrelevant.

    21. Re:Done 40 years ago by EdIII · · Score: 2

      It IS valuable.

      Right now it is a tragedy of the commons. Nobody will acknowledge the incredible shortage in the next coming decade and those who have the power over the reserves are basically sticking their heads in the sand. Sales are being pushed against the counsel of those who know better, which results in artificially cheap helium prices. The excuse was reducing the deficit.

      Search Slashdot for some articles. I can't find it, but there was an article on helium policy within the last week in the US.

      In the same fashion as climate science deniers, there are those that are claiming there are hundreds of years left of helium. This conveniently leaves out the cost of actually getting it from the ground.

      Granted, it is assumptions on how much helium is in the ground, but that does not change the facts:

      * limited amount. Not going to be anymore.
      * difficulty in extracting it as a resource.
      * ever increasing demand.

      Unless we change our policies, helium is going to become a vary rare resource, much sooner than you think. Just seems foolish to put it in a balloon and force prices so cheap that we can afford not to recapture the helium off such uses as you mentioned.

    22. Re:Done 40 years ago by tibit · · Score: 1

      And since partial pressure of helium in our atmosphere would IIRC pass for 1st stage vacuum, I wouldn't worry about the inside having any practical amounts of helium left. It will be evacuated, for all purposes.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    23. Re:Done 40 years ago by tibit · · Score: 1

      Nope. That's the beauty of membranes. That's why your kidneys work.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    24. Re:Done 40 years ago by ultrasawblade · · Score: 1

      Would like to see the clerk's face if I took a bunch of hard drives to Walmart and asked if they could refill them with helium.

    25. Re:Done 40 years ago by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      actually, they use larger particles called helium watchers. those keep the smaller heliums from getting out thru the holes.

      (notsureifserious, etc)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    26. Re:Done 40 years ago by FishTankX · · Score: 2

      Let's think about this another way.

      Let's say right now, that a hard disk costs $300 for a 3TB drive. And helium tech allows the same drive to be made, almost free, for a capacity of 4TB. That's probably $100 aditional value seen by the consumer.

      Right now if we say that the hard disk, with a good estimate, has about 10 cubic inches of 40 cubic inches of helium in the drive, and leaks 2 cubic inches per year.

      At current helium prices, the price for a cubic foot of helium as far as I know is about $5. So you're paying $5 for 144 cubic inches of helium. So you're drive costs $5/77 or 10 cents a year to sustain. Let's say the hard drive has an average service life of 10 years.

      That's about a dollar over the lifetime of the hard disk.

      Now, if helium provides proportional gains over the conceivable lifetime of the hard disk technology, helium could go up 50x in price (pushing out MRI, welding, etc...) and STILL provide a massive economic advantage.

      I'd also like to point out that if the average drive leaks 2 cubic inches per year, and 500 million drives are in service, they will consume 0.02% of the world wide helium consumption of 85 million cubic meters per year.

      http://minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/pubs/commodity/helium/heliumcs06.pdf

      Feel free to check/refute my numbers.

    27. Re:Done 40 years ago by amorsen · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I should have used the word "expensive" rather than "valuable".

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    28. Re:Done 40 years ago by heypete · · Score: 1

      This. My lab works in UHV (~5e-11 mbar): we have a lot of difficulty pumping hydrogen with turbomolecular pumps -- it can backflow through the turbo. We have some big getters to keep it under control, but it's still the largest fraction of residual gas in the system.

      Helium's a bit better, in that we can pump it (but a tiny fraction backflows if we're not careful). I don't know how impermeable they are over long timescales (months and years) but Conflat flanges seem to be impermeable to helium for the timescales that we need (hours) -- we have no noticeable increase in helium-3 or -4 during multi-hour measurements without pumping.

    29. Re:Done 40 years ago by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Yes and No. The helium will leak out until the partial pressure of helium on both sides equalizes (ie, when as much helium diffuses in as diffuses out).

      That is a non-answer. Does the pressure inside the vessel affect the rate of diffusion, or not?

      For that matter, has anyone in this thread bothered to google "helium barrier"? They exist. They could apply a coating to the enclosure and use a specially formulated adhesive to essentially eliminate this problem entirely (at least for all practical purposes.)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. Re:They will not be lighter by Desler · · Score: 2

    The lighter weight is due to using thinner platters not the helium.

  10. You'll know when they break too! by ArcadeNut · · Score: 1

    You'll sound like Alvin and the Chipmunks!

    --
    Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
  11. Re:They will not be lighter by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    I don't think the article nor the summary states it's due to the gas.

  12. Great! by fm6 · · Score: 1

    Yet another way to use up a nonrenewable resource.

    1. Re:Great! by Experiment+626 · · Score: 2

      We should save the helium for more critical applications, such as filling up balloons and talking like Munchkins.

    2. Re:Great! by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Balloons can use hydrogen. Much more fun at parties. And if you need helium to talk like a Munchkin you're just not trying.

    3. Re:Great! by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      how many balloons to the drive?

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  13. Re:Helium shortage by Revotron · · Score: 1

    Well, they can't ride the price-surge wave of the Thailand floods anymore, so they have to keep those prices up somehow.

  14. Not the first by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 5, Informative

    These drives are not the first. Circa 1969, Digital Development Corporation of San Diego sold a line of head-per-track disks that used a helium atmosphere. A typical unit took around 24 inches vertical height in a 19-inch rack. Given the difficulties of sealing anything against helium leakage, these drives required a small helium cylinder and pressure regulator to maintain a small positive pressure within the enclosure, and had a pop-off valve to vent excess pressure. The electronics consisted of about a dozen circuit cards built with discrete transistors. The capacities of these units were amusingly small by modern standards: the first one that I had direct experience with, held something like 128K bytes.

    1. Re:Not the first by stox · · Score: 1

      I'll bet they had great seek times though.

      --
      "To those who are overly cautious, everything is impossible. "
    2. Re:Not the first by dsgrntlxmply · · Score: 1

      It took only microseconds for head switching, but rotational latency was the usual 8.33ms average. The impact of rotational latency could be reduced, depending upon the application and controller hardware, by ordering operations according to the upcoming sector boundary.

      We used these in realtime bank transaction processing (for ATMs and POS terminals) circa 1977, to look up card numbers and a very limited amount of associated information (much like the credit card deny-list book that merchants used to keep at the cash register).

    3. Re:Not the first by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The impact of rotational latency could be reduced, depending upon the application and controller hardware, by ordering operations according to the upcoming sector boundary.

      Obligatory: The Story of Mel

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  15. Sure they weigh less by countach · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sure they weigh less, because they are filled with helium. But when the servers start lifting off the ground and floating off, they might have to rethink this idea.

    1. Re:Sure they weigh less by DigiShaman · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well shit! My data is already in the cloud. What difference would it make anyways?

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Sure they weigh less by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      These hard drives are obviously made for cloud storage.

    3. Re:Sure they weigh less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      IBM Power 595 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/power/hardware/595/specs.html weighs about 3400 pounds.

      One time, I asked a IBM guy why their servers weigh so much. He replied (jokingly) that if it didn't, all the fans would make it hover.

  16. So When The Helium Leaks Out, Drive Dies? by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    Sure helium could improve performance and be beneficial for some uses, but anyone buying these need to ask what happens when the helium inevitably leaks out...

    To me it looks another example of planned obsolescence at work. Though, perhaps, WD will take the razor blade approach and sell helium refill kits.

  17. Hey! by FFOMelchior · · Score: 1

    Maybe some of us already like prog.

  18. Not to worry, monitor indicator. by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Insightful

    anyone buying these need to ask what happens when the helium inevitably leaks out...

    No worries; when the balloon attached to the side is half-full you know it's time to replace the drive and then find a child to give the balloon to.

    Or if you are not in a hurry take the drive in to any Party Center USA store for a free refill.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Grams are not a unit of weight by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

    This drive's weight and its mass will be different due to the buoyancy of the helium in a sealed container. I wonder if the drives contain 690 grams of mass, or if their weight is the same as a non-buoyant 690-gram object (i.e. 6.77 newtons at sea level on Earth). The implication seems to be that the helium-filled drives contain more than 690 grams of mass, but weigh the same as a 690-gram object.

    1. Re:Grams are not a unit of weight by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      The weight reduction from the helium replacing the air will be negligible. The reduced mass comes from being able to use lighter platters and arms.

    2. Re:Grams are not a unit of weight by PPH · · Score: 1

      When your tech knocks one off the workbench, look for it up on the ceiling.

      Oh, what I'd give for the time to photoshop a neckbeard holding a bunch of HDs by their SATA cables like a circus clown with balloons.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:Grams are not a unit of weight by coldsalmon · · Score: 1

      True, it's a purely academic point, but the fact remains: someone is wrong on the internet!

    4. Re:Grams are not a unit of weight by squidflakes · · Score: 1

      Its cool man. Somewhere, right now, someone is posting 'your' when they mean 'you're', suggesting that pi is exactly 3, and quoting Newton's laws about orbital bodies when clearly they need to be referring to Kepler.

      Yet, there are so few of us and so many of them.

  20. New Meaning by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2

    Brings about a whole new meaning to keeping your data "in the cloud," doesn't it?


    OK, so that didn't sound as funny as I thought it would...there's a joke in there somewhere, dammit.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:New Meaning by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It'll sound funnier if you suck in some helium first.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  21. Re:Helium shortage by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    It's one of the most plentiful elements in the universe. If there is a market for it, it will be obtained somehow. The threatened shortage is what happens when government gets involved with things.

  22. Re:More platters = More problems by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    15 platters on conventional disks = 3 motors, 3 actuators, 3 electronic boards, and 3 power supplies to fail.

    14 platters on two He disks = 33% fewer of these, with more storage.

  23. Why not ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    .... hydrogen?

    Cue the Hindenberg jokes(Oh teh humaniteez!). But then consider that hydrogen is used to cool large generators. And you don't see these exploding randomly.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Why not ... by PPH · · Score: 2

      Well, after getting up off the floor after a good roll around and laugh, I'll remind myself that HDDs don't contain an internal ignitor. Nor does their firmware support a 'detonate HD' opcode.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    2. Re:Why not ... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      True, those features are reserved for the SecureErase version.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  24. Re:Helium shortage by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There shouldn't be. Its a by-product of natural gas production. And what with the way that is growing, the supply coming out of the ground should be increasing as well.

    If there is a shortage, the price should go up. And the gas producers will happily invest in the recovery equipment needed.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  25. Does this mean that Apple Store employees using... by gatesstillborg · · Score: 1

    these "floatable" hard drives for (covered previously on slashdot) skateboards will now be able to "catch some rad air"? :)

  26. Secondary advantage to helium by pjwhite · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another advantage of using a drive filled with helium is better thermal conductivity than air (0.142 vs 0.024) . The heat generated by the inner workings of the drive will be conducted to the outer case, keeping the inside cooler.

    1. Re:Secondary advantage to helium by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 1

      Check this out. The heat transfer coefficients to various gases also vary wildly (measured as fluid flowing over tube bundles).

      http://v_ganapathy.tripod.com/preshtcout.pdf

      Though helium is not listed, look how much higher the figures are for hydrogen. Interesting!

      Another interesting thing is how the hydrogen curves vary so little with pressure, right down to very low temps.

      If helium is similar to hydrogen, it would be good at removing heat. As far as heat transfer trhough the gas goes, I would expect that to be aided by convection.

    2. Re:Secondary advantage to helium by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1
      According to the Google whitepaper on harddisk failure (PDF warning) high temperatures aren't a problem. It's low temperatures you've got to watch out for.

      The figure shows that failures do not increase when the average temperature increases. In fact, there is a clear trend showing that lower temperatures are associated with higher failure rates. Only at very high temperatures is there a slight reversal of this trend.

      See the end of page 5 of the whitepaper, beginning page 6 for a graphical view.
      The high temperatures of the quote are 45 to 50 C.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
  27. Re:They will not be lighter by dinfinity · · Score: 1

    I guess that means that GP is fired.

  28. Not necessarily by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to Wiki, for half a century the US Constitution was hermetically sealed inside a glass container with helium.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hermetic_seal

    --
    :(){ :|:& };:
    1. Re:Not necessarily by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Note: GLASS container.

      Glasses are amorphous solids, with no crystal structure.
      Normal metals (there are exceptional varieties, more in a bit) have discrete crystal structures called "grains". The boundries between these grains are where the helium escapes, much like water or oil through fractured bedrock.

      There exists a very very expensive subclass of metal material known as "metallic glass". http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amorphous_metal

      Metallic glasses are much harder than normal metal materials, even of identical formulation, conduct electricity better, and being amorphous, would better serve as a container for gasses like helium, like silicate glasses do.

      The problem is that they re absurdly difficult to produce in large yields, and thus, very expensive.

      Your typical HDD enclosure is not going to be made of metallic glass.

  29. I love it. by garyoa1 · · Score: 2

    Now, instead of using a half dozen smaller drives you can use just one. And when it dies you can lose everything at once. No screwing around losing bits and pieces of your files.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  30. Been there, done that by frovingslosh · · Score: 2

    Yes, I worked in some of those drives (I remember a "big" 10 meg drive) and the helium leakage will be a problem. But not for WD, only for the users. The helium will leak (the damn stuff is tiny and leaks out of anything ), but WD only needs to keep enough inside or the drive to last beyond the absurdly short warranty period. Then the drive self destructs. Good for WD if they manage to keep creating a market for new drives, bad for the customer.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  31. Re:Helium shortage by goodmanj · · Score: 2

    "Its a by-product of natural gas production. And what with the way that is growing, the supply coming out of the ground should be increasing as well."

    Ah-ah-ah! No! Natural gas and helium are formed in two different kind of rocks, but in a traditional natural gas reservoir, there's a dome of cap rock which traps and pools the gas and keeps it from leaking to the surface. The cap traps both natural gas and helium.

    But the growing supply of natural gas in the past few years comes from fracking. There's no cap in a fracked well, just source rock, and so they *won't* produce helium.

  32. One side effect... by jd2112 · · Score: 2

    All of my music files sound like they were recorded by Alvin and the Chipmunks.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  33. Low pressure to prevent leaks? by goodmanj · · Score: 1

    Seems to me it's pretty easy to solve the problem of the helium leaking out: fill the drive with helium at low pressure -- just below the lowest atmospheric pressure you intend to use the disk. The helium will try to diffuse out through the metal, but it's an uphill battle. Now all you've got to do is seal the disk so air can't get *in*, which is easy enough, and your drive will last forever. I haven't done the math, but it should work.

    1. Re:Low pressure to prevent leaks? by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 4, Informative

      Look up partial pressure in some physics book. If you have gas in some leaky container at some pressure, it doesn't matter that there is another gas at another pressure outside of that container. Even if the different gases are at equal pressure, what will happen is that each will diffuse into the other through the aperture. That diffusion depends just on the respective partial pressures.

      Helium at a lower pressure does not face an uphill battle due to the excess pressure outside of the container. It just diffuses through the apertures in the imperfect containers at a lower rate due to its lower pressure.

      What would slow down the leak would be if there was helium on the outside at the same pressure, because then there would be as much helium diffusing into the container as diffusing out. But there is very little helium outside the hard drive, it being such a rare gas.

      I think that if the apertures in the leaky container are such that helium can escape, but air cannot get in, then in fact the container will slowly evacuate. Pressure in that container will gradually drop as helium escapes, while hardly any finds its way back in.

  34. Re:They will not be lighter by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    Your the only one who made that claim.

  35. Another classic nerd joke, ruined. by conspirator23 · · Score: 1

    Now when you tell the end-user that they "let the magic smoke out" you might be completely accurate.

  36. Re:Not really by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Except they are using helium, and not hydrogen.

    They are on opposite ends of the periodic table for a reason.

  37. Magic Smoke by RegTooLate · · Score: 1

    Goodness people, tag it magic smoke.

  38. Re:Yeah but... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    I have several WD drives (Caviar Black and Green), and have had some of them for years. Not a single one of them has failed on me. (Yet. Fingers crossed!)

    That reminds me... Backup time.

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  39. However... by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    ...The Carbon Gang, Nitrogen Group, and the Oxygen Brotherhood reacted explosively to the news. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:However... by mudshark · · Score: 2

      Argon was just showing how noble he was.

      --
      In other news, astrophysicists have announced that they now know what all that dark matter is: it's stupidity.
  40. Shielded suit,lol. by Grog6 · · Score: 2

    A PET transmission source is Ge-68 or Cs-137, both gamma emitters.

    The 90% shielding thickness in lead is about 3". A 3" thick suit is too heavy to move.

    Add to that problem, the fact that shielding a source imperfectly is bad for you, because of the nature of how shielding works.

    Shielding from gamma photons require a series of scattering collisions with the shielding media, losing energy with each one, usually as x-ray photons or lattice vibrations.

    Low energy photons in the low x-ray region are very likely to be fully absorbed by the body; high energy gammas tend to go right thru you, depositing less energy.

    Tshirt and shorts are also great when you're removing all the gantry covers, too. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  41. Re:hard disk lead balloon calculation by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

    You're about 3 orders of magnitude off my gut says. 1m^3 gives you a buoyancy of more than 1 kg/g0, enough to lift the drive.

  42. Hydrogen much worse than helium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Permeation rates of helium is much, much lower than hydrogen in metals, especially steels where hydrogen permeates much faster than non-nobel gases, which permeate much faster than noble gases. Considering most large vacuum and pressure vessels are made of varieties of steel, hydrogen is typically the most problematic gas to deal with keeping in or out in many situations.

  43. Actually,squeaky voices will sing to say 'Bad Day' by D4C5CE · · Score: 1
  44. So what? by unitron · · Score: 1

    It's not like they're going to specifically be made to be compatible with TiVo drive controllers.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  45. Re:MP3s Sound Like the Chipmunks by unitron · · Score: 1

    My MP3s will sound like The Chipmunks and God knows what my porn will look like!...

    All of the breasts will be inflated.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  46. So Much for Your Music Collection by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

    Now with helium in the drive, all your mp3s will sound like Alvin and the Chipmunks.

    Or is it Helium? In that case, the Tharks will be constantly attacking your computer.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  47. Oil Cooling will weigh it down by Dareth · · Score: 1
    --

    I only look human.
    My mother is a halfling and my dad is an ogre, so that makes me an Ogreling
  48. "Bernoulli Box" by swb · · Score: 1

    ...after the Bernoulli effect.

    They were made by Iomega, according to Wikipedia.

    I never saw any personally and remember the Syquest removable HDD cart drives being more common, at least in the 1990s when removable HDD technology was viable.

  49. Re:hard disk lead balloon calculation by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    But how much heavier is the drive going to be if you make it that big?

  50. Re:Yeah but... by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

    Admittedly I'm not running a data center or anything so my experience is limited, but the only hard drives I've ever had fail on me have both been 80GB WD Caviars. Purchased a couple years apart. Haven't bought a WD drive since.

  51. Will this make the drives lighter? by Douglas+Goodall · · Score: 1

    Weight is such a factor in notebook applications, and helium filled drives could enable a new class of devices weighing significantly less than existing hard drivers...

  52. It's not absolute zero - stuff moves by dbIII · · Score: 1
    You've forgotten that "a committee of slashdotters" can include engineers and materials scientists :)
    I was a member of ASTM before I even connected to a BBS on a dialup modem, but as I indicated elsewhere, it's not a difficult problem and I could have given you the same answer as a first year student.
    I've attached a link to a simple experiment that should give you an idea of what is going on, which can then be modified for different materials and thicknesses, so you'd design the drive with a thick enough wall of aluminium or whatever to get a long enough life.
    http://www.all-science-fair-projects.com/project1075_91_1.html

    The actual "math" is on wikipedia under diffusion.

    Anyway, my point is that filling the drives with helium results in a finite drive life and the time is going to depend on how long it takes to lose the gas. It just means the thing has to be designed with that in mind and to say push it out to decades where it's likely to have failed another way anyway.

    It has also been surmised that you could reasonably make an enclosure which would remain essentially full of hydrogen until the heat death of the universe using current technology

    Not surmised that way by anyone with a grasp on high school level physics or chemistry. To take things to a higher level than that, you get age hardening of some aluminium alloys by diffusion within a solid at room temperature over a timescale of months - just because it's a solid that does not mean it's a barrier that stops everything, and that especially applies when something very small is diffusing through a structure.

    1. Re:It's not absolute zero - stuff moves by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      To take things to a higher level than that, you get age hardening of some aluminium alloys by diffusion within a solid at room temperature over a timescale of months

      OK, now please address the issue of "helium barrier" coatings and membranes, which no one has yet done.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:It's not absolute zero - stuff moves by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Simple, a structure that is closed enough that diffusion of helium is inhibited, so it takes longer than through other structures.
      It helps if you think of solids as a big lattice and remember that there are occasional gaps in the lattice where there are crystal defects. With a lot of metals it's easy to visualise because the lattice is cubic.
      There are larger gaps in a lattice between atoms in most iron based crystal structures than you get with some high density hydrocarbon (nylon) or flourocarbon (teflon) polymers.

      Anyway, the stuff is going to get out, but with the right materials and design it should take more years than would matter (but not "heat death of the universe" stuff, more like tens or hundreds - eg. the helium under hundreds of metres of rock is a lot newer than the oil it's found with).

    3. Re:It's not absolute zero - stuff moves by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Anyway, the stuff is going to get out, but with the right materials and design it should take more years than would matter (but not "heat death of the universe" stuff, more like tens or hundreds

      So, not hyperbolically long, but more than long enough to matter. Thanks, that's what I thought.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:It's not absolute zero - stuff moves by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The posts here (http://photo.net/digital-darkroom-forum/00OLzF?start=10) by Kelly Flanigan describe what other things limit the life of drives (mainly the bearing lubricants), so keeping a decent helium pressure for two or three decades at operating temperature is probably plenty. That would probably correspond to a century or two turned off at 20C.

  53. Re:Yeah but... by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

    Mine are from some hundred GB and up to 2 TB, so maybe they got better recently?

    --
    Clever signature text goes here.
  54. Re:Helium shortage by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    A link for anyone who feels the AC has some kind of point.

    http://www.periodictable.com/Properties/A/UniverseAbundance.html