Slashdot Mirror


New Study Links Caffeinated Coffee To Vision Loss

dsinc writes "A new study suggests caffeinated coffee drinkers should limit their intake to reduce their chances of developing vision loss or blindness. According to a scientific paper in Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, heavy caffeinated coffee consumption is associated with an increased risk of developing exfoliation glaucoma (abstract), the leading cause of secondary glaucoma worldwide. 'Scandinavian populations have the highest frequencies of exfoliation syndrome and glaucoma,' said author Jae Hee Kang, ScD, of Channing Division of Network Medicine at Brigham and Women's Hospital in Boston, Mass. 'Because Scandinavian populations also have the highest consumption of caffeinated coffee in the world, and our research group has previously found that greater caffeinated coffee intake was associated with increased risk of primary open-angle glaucoma, we conducted this study to evaluate whether the risk of exfoliation glaucoma or glaucoma suspect may be different by coffee consumption.'"

134 of 203 comments (clear)

  1. Coffee is... by Ashenkase · · Score: 5, Funny

    Good for you... Coffee is bad for you... Coffee is good for you... Coffee is bad for you...

    Coffee is making me sea sick.

    1. Re:Coffee is... by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      Try the sea weed

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    2. Re:Coffee is... by Hatta · · Score: 5, Funny

      Smoke some Cannabis. It will help with both the nausea and the glaucoma.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    3. Re:Coffee is... by Anrego · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Indeed.

      Personally I figure anything in moderation is probably less toxic than the world in general. If you enjoy coffee, drink a few cups a day and don't worry about it! Don't specifically drink coffee if you don't like it, and don't drink 15 cups a day..

      The interesting thing is that we worry about these kind of slight threats to our health, but ignore the absolute real killers: sitting on our asses for most fo the day, not getting enough sleep, eating food that is barely food, stress...

      I like to think any of those things are going to be a much bigger factor on my longevity than the cup of coffee I had this morning..

    4. Re:Coffee is... by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny
      So...it is the coffee that is making me go blind...

      All this time, I thought it was the other thing....

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    5. Re:Coffee is... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      We're boned.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    6. Re:Coffee is... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Informative

      Smoke some Cannabis. It will help with both the nausea and the glaucoma.

      Dammit... beat me to it!

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    7. Re:Coffee is... by dmbasso · · Score: 2

      No, the other thing is responsible for the hairy hand.

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    8. Re:Coffee is... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good for you... Coffee is bad for you... Coffee is good for you... Coffee is bad for you...

      Coffee is making me sea sick.

      Which is why I switched to tea ... which is good for you ... which is bad for you .. which is good for you ...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    9. Re:Coffee is... by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 2

      That's not much coffee.

    10. Re:Coffee is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Coffee is making me sea sick.

      No I think the article is trying to say it makes you see sick.

    11. Re:Coffee is... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I think the key word is "suggest". I don't know how widespread glaucoma is, but if anyone I know has it I don't know that they do. The, I don't know how many people I know have high blood pressure, either.

      I would think that anything that would increase blood pressure would be a risk for glaucoma. When they test occular pressure they tell you not to cross your legs, as that raises blood pressure and gives them a false, high reading.

      If your blood pressure is high, you have a lot more dangerous things to worry about than glaucoma -- you'll probably die of a coronary long before you go blind.

      However, this is a good excuse to smoke a joint while you're enjoying your coffee!

    12. Re:Coffee is... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 2

      The interesting thing is that we worry about these kind of slight threats to our health, but ignore the absolute real killers: sitting on our asses for most fo the day, not getting enough sleep, eating food that is barely food, stress

      Equally interesting may be that the folks who drink the most coffee are the ones that follow your illustration

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    13. Re:Coffee is... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      eating food that is barely food

      I thought fake food was okay... in moderation. :p

    14. Re:Coffee is... by Wansu · · Score: 1

        Good for you... Coffee is bad for you... Coffee is good for you... Coffee is bad for you...

      I need my glasses to read this.

      --
      Wansu, th' chinese sailor
    15. Re:Coffee is... by englishknnigits · · Score: 1

      Stole the thoughts right out of my brain (I'm sorry, it must have been scary!). You could probably add "stare at a computer screen all day" to the list of things heavy coffee drinkers typically do.

    16. Re:Coffee is... by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Then it just means you'll live long enough to get glaucoma or cancer instead of dropping dead earlier.

      --
    17. Re:Coffee is... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better yet, always add a bit to every can of coffee you brew. Of course it'll take extensive tests to determine the ideal mix. Very extensive i bet; any volunteers?

      Unfortunately, THC is not soluble in water. Therefore, you'll have to brew your coffee/cannabis mix with grain alcohol instead of water. Oh wait, were we trying to avoid blindness?

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    18. Re:Coffee is... by gildur · · Score: 2

      Perhaps the increased rate of vision loss is due to the extra life span gained from all the coffee.

    19. Re:Coffee is... by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      While, I know you are making a drug reference joke. However that is the main issue I see with medical Marijuana. There is little testing to see what is the right amount for actually medical benefits and the amount that will just get you stoned.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    20. Re:Coffee is... by Anrego · · Score: 1

      Obviously a joke, but that statement is probably true!

      The occasional dinner that came in a box that you shove in the oven for an hour would probably be fine if the majority of ones food was home cooked from relatively clean ingredients. For most (myself included, though I am trying..) it's probably the opposite .. with the kind of food we should be eating every day being an occasional indulgance, or even novelty!

    21. Re:Coffee is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Must be a bit embarrassing that a stoner beat you to anything...

    22. Re:Coffee is... by barryvoeten · · Score: 1

      Why is this modded as funny?

      It's informative.

    23. Re:Coffee is... by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could infuse hot milk with some cannabis, then add it to your coffee!

    24. Re:Coffee is... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Funny

      Must be a bit embarrassing that a stoner beat you to anything...

      I got distracted... I was in such a rush to post that I dropped a cherry in my lap :P

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    25. Re:Coffee is... by Rockoon · · Score: 4, Funny

      my eyes arent too good, can you inspect my palms for me?

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    26. Re:Coffee is... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Good for you... Coffee is bad for you... Coffee is good for you... Coffee is bad for you...

      Coffee is making me sea sick.

      Which is why I switched to tea ... which is good for you ... which is bad for you .. which is good for you ...

      I am contemplating just switching to soda. That way I'll know that it's bad for me.

      I just can't take the uncertainty anymore.

    27. Re:Coffee is... by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Seems not enough people here have played Oblivion or Skyrim: Dawngard to know what you are referring to.

    28. Re:Coffee is... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      sea weed is high in the stuff that is further processed into MSG.

      Too much of that is bad for you.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    29. Re:Coffee is... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      The usual indications for Cannabis can be self titrated pretty easily. Anti-emesis, analgesic, anxiolytic, etc. If you feel better, it did its job. These obvious medical benefits, combined with the extremely low toxicity (compare aspirin), should earn Cannabis a spot in every medicine cabinet, OTC.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    30. Re:Coffee is... by Zordak · · Score: 1

      The occasional dinner that came in a box that you shove in the oven for an hour would probably be fine

      Um, 19 (I don't know, '64 maybe?) called. They want their "easy dinner" model back. Now excuse me while I shove a chemical-based foodlike substance in the microwave for three minutes or so.

      --

      Today's Sesame Street was brought to you by the number e.
    31. Re:Coffee is... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      only to a point. The 'effects' of caffeine are lost after 2 weeks of regular use.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    32. Re:Coffee is... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's off topic.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    33. Re:Coffee is... by mbone · · Score: 1

      Better yet, always add a bit to every can of coffee you brew. Of course it'll take extensive tests to determine the ideal mix. Very extensive i bet; any volunteers?

      This excellent corporate video suggests that Starbucks is working on it.

    34. Re:Coffee is... by strikethree · · Score: 1

      According to the latest medical studies on coffee and caffeine, I can choose to be blind and have a functioning brain when I get older or I can see but not actually remember any of it. If I had to choose, I think I would choose blind and a functioning brain.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    35. Re:Coffee is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      So are tomatoes, cheeses, meats, and anything else with a savory flavor.
      Too much of anything is bad for you.
      In moderation, mono-sodium glutamate is no worse for you than salt, sugar, capsaicin, or citric acid.
      And if you live your life avoiding all savory foods, I weep for you.

    36. Re:Coffee is... by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Dude, we're talking coffee. Salt intake needs to be balanced with the amount of exercise you get. I walk 30-45 minutes to or from work almost every day. Someone more sessile should avoid added salt, which means processed foods.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    37. Re:Coffee is... by drkim · · Score: 1

      So...it is the coffee that is making me go blind...

      All this time, I thought it was the other thing....

      :)

      ...and, for the record...

      Never do the other thing with a cup of coffee in your hand.

      Just take my word on this one...

      Signed,
      Loyal /. Viewer
      Burn Ward 2, Bed 4
      County Hospital

    38. Re:Coffee is... by drkim · · Score: 1

      Better yet, always add a bit to every can of coffee you brew.

      ...you could call it a "speed bong."

    39. Re:Coffee is... by drkim · · Score: 1

      Sure it has it's medical uses but look at what those uses are: appetite encouragement, "social anxiety relief", pain relief etc... The objective IS to get stoned.

      That problem is now solved:
      Researchers develop marijuana without the high

      It will be interesting to see how many people need 'medicinal' marijuana, when it is purely medicinal.

      "The “highless” marijuana still eases the symptoms of the medical marijuana patients, but it contains less than 1 percent of THC, the chemical that causes pot’s signature euphoric high.

      Instead, this new cannabis strain, called Avidekel, is beefed up with 15.8% cannabidiol, or CBD, which has anti-inflammatory benefits but doesn’t bind to the brain’s receptors the way THC does."

    40. Re:Coffee is... by Altus · · Score: 1

      Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    41. Re:Coffee is... by sgt+scrub · · Score: 1

      Oh wow man. What was the topic? I forgot.

      --
      Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
    42. Re:Coffee is... by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      I've never used medicinal marijuana (or other prescription pain killers) first hand, but the general consensus I get from people who have is that when they are in genuine pain, the substances make them feel better. When the substances start making them feel high instead of better, they know they are on the road to recovery and can cut back the dosage until it hurts again.

      Considering how overdosing on marijuana is impossible in practice, I don't see the lack of precision in dose measurements is a problem. Even if marijuana use turned out to be completely useless medically, it is harmless enough that it's use as a placebo should not be infringed upon.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    43. Re:Coffee is... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      There is little testing to see what is the right amount for actually medical benefits and the amount that will just get you stoned.

      OK, I'll volunteer.

      For the sake of science.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    44. Re:Coffee is... by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      A thousand times better is Cannabis Juice. Juice made from freshly harvested leaves and flowers before they dry is completely THC free, so it doesn't get you high, and it will cure and/or prevent just about every known disease. Only problem is that unless you know a grower who will sacrifice a portion of his income to give you the juice, you can't buy it anywhere on the planet of the naked apes.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    45. Re:Coffee is... by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

      Your strong right arm?

      Sorta gives new meaning to the phrase, "My right-hand-man", doesn't it?

      --

      THINK! It's patriotic

  2. Correlation != Causation by gregor-e · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It may be that people whose genetics predispose them to exfoliation glaucoma are also more than usually enchanted by coffee. Still, interesting observation.

    1. Re:Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The next thing you know, they're going to try and tell us that sitting down in front of your monitor and coding all day is bad for us.

    2. Re:Correlation != Causation by TWX · · Score: 2

      Or people in cold, cold climates are literally freezing their eyeballs into having health problems via exposure to the elements, and also happen to like hot beverages to counteract the cold...

      I want to see the same study conducted on Scandinavian ex-pats who drink copious amounts of coffee in less frigid climates.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    3. Re:Correlation != Causation by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

      This seems to be what a lot of research into drugs reveals--that one substance can affect two different people drastically, and sometimes it is genetic. I've read studies linking caffeine with protective cardiovascular effects in one group of people, and damaging cardiovascular effects in others. And there's also been studies linking increased caffeine consumption with reduced chance of cognitive decline and related illnesses later in life.

      While we are at it: studies linking marijuana with protective effects in MS patients, compared to studies showing people with certain types of genes (a small percentage of the population) have an increased risk of psychosis after use. Or studies showing potential harm or positives from drinking alcohol.

      My hypothesis: it's all a crapshoot, in the end, really.

      --
      "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
    4. Re:Correlation != Causation by strength_of_10_men · · Score: 2

      Just to throw out something else to consider:

      http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2012-01/meae-ots122911.php

      "Outside temperatures, sun exposure and gender may trigger glaucoma"

      Importantly, those with a lifetime residential history of living in the middle tier and south tier of the United States was associated with 47% and 75% reduced risks, respectively, compared with living in the northern tier...

      Without having read the full paper, it seems to me that what they're saying is that your location has a lot to do with the risk. Perhaps it's the extra exposure to UV/Sunlight from snow reflection? So it makes sense that TFA finds an increase in risk for people in Scandinavian regions.

    5. Re:Correlation != Causation by djsmiley · · Score: 1

      Blondes who experince more snow glare than anyone else in the world? Nah never.

      --
      - http://www.milkme.co.uk
    6. Re:Correlation != Causation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Must agree and disagree.

      From our ignorant, "try banging the rocks together guys," state of science, yes, it feels like a crapshoot.

      But these kinds of studies are great to have on hand, so that when DNA is well understood and cheaply examined we can find the factors that make caffeine good and bad for a person. The net result, in the Gattaca Age, will be that you go to the thrice repurposed GeneOMat drive through, get your print out and at the bottom just above your total_fitness_index, will be the list of drugs that work for you, and that don't.

      Mine:

      Caffiene: No benefits, no effects
      Amoxycilin: Expect allergic reaction
      Novacane: 10% expected effacacy
      Cannabis: Expect contact nausea at exposure frequencies less than 1 per week
      Rogane: Effective
      Butenafine
            Hydrochloride: Ineffective
      Alcohol: 1 std. serving per day, cardio_effects +, liver_effects negligble

      At that point it won't be a crapshoot, and starting life knowing these things would be extremely useful.
      The process starts with studies like this article.

    7. Re:Correlation != Causation by freeze128 · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Outside temperatures, sun exposure and gender may trigger glaucoma"

      Oh my GOD! *I* have a gender... I wonder if I'm at risk...

    8. Re:Correlation != Causation by Pope · · Score: 1

      Well, you *are* broadcasting an IP address...

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    9. Re:Correlation != Causation by Stormbringer · · Score: 1

      Nahhh, read it again: as long as the sun doesn't have one (or, if it does, it's not naked), you're all right.

    10. Re:Correlation != Causation by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      It may be that people whose genetics predispose them to exfoliation glaucoma are also more than usually enchanted by coffee. Still, interesting observation.

      I thought the same thing. It seems far more likely it's genetic than coffee related. They are hardly the only population with a heavy coffee consumption. It would be more compelling if they found people in professions and such that drank a lot of coffee had the problem. I come out of entertainment and we drank it like fish and I don't recall many, if any in truth, with the problem. The French drink very strong coffee and a lot of it and they don't have a spike.

    11. Re:Correlation != Causation by SlippyToad · · Score: 1

      Is Correlative science the only thing that gets done anymore?

      Well, it is easier to do a quick study of how 50% of people are of below-average intelligence, than it is to figure out what causes paranoia or depression, after all. I have a feeling that the reason we see so much of this kind of relatively-useless crap is that it generates headlines and gets people up in arms about stuff, whereas actual conclusions often turn out to be boring and infrequent, unless they are revolutionary.

      --
      One day I feel I'm ahead of the wheel / the next it's rolling over me / I can get back on / I can get back on
    12. Re:Correlation != Causation by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

      And...it's a stretch to even find a correlation, with percentages that small!

    13. Re:Correlation != Causation by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      While we are at it: studies linking marijuana with protective effects in MS patients, compared to studies showing people with certain types of genes (a small percentage of the population) have an increased risk of psychosis after use.

      That sounds interesting; a correlation has been shown, but what I've read suggests that those predisposed to psychosis are also predisposed to smoking pot. I haven't read of any genetic component linking pot and psychosis, although there are genetic components to most mental illnesses.

    14. Re:Correlation != Causation by DiscountBorg(TM) · · Score: 1

      I wish I could find the study off the top of my head. It linked a specific gene with a dramatically increased risk for psychosis, and adults without this gene were conversely, at very low risk.. I saw the study a few years ago so it's one of those things where I can't recall any more detail than that. Maybe google..

      --
      "The single biggest problem in communication is the illusion that it has taken place." George Bernard Shaw
    15. Re:Correlation != Causation by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 1

      No, no. Just wait for a bit. They are still trying to figure out whose gender is triggering our potential glaucoma.

    16. Re:Correlation != Causation by siddesu · · Score: 1

      only if you have eyes that go with your gender.

  3. Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Damn... Between caffeinated coffee and masturbation, it's amazing I'm not completely blind...

    1. Re:Damn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Just don't masturbate into your coffee.

  4. OK... Next question: by lorenlal · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, does this mean it's time to start evaluating a possible reason?

    I ask because I love my coffee. Seriously, I'm stupid for it... But the last thing I need is another activity that supposedly makes me go blind...

  5. Other explanations by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geez. To me this is kind of like in the movie "The Jerk" when the crazy guy is trying to kill Steve Martin's character by shooting him from across the road with a rifle and Martin concludes that the guy has a problem with cans and he's actually attacking the cans, which just happen to also be everywhere Steve is.

    Scandinavian people are more blue eyed than most ethnic groups and it's been known for years that blue eyed people may be more sensitive to vision problems caused by sunlight. It could also be that for some reason (ozone depletion?) that Scandinavia gets stronger sunlight than other regions. If they want to convince me that there is something to do this, show me a study in Brazil where there aren't very many blue eyed people and they drink a lot of coffee too.

    1. Re:Other explanations by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      If they want to convince me that there is something to do this, show me a study in Brazil where there aren't very many blue eyed people and they drink a lot of coffee too.

      Or conversely, they could compare the Scandinavian people who drink coffee with the Scandinavian people who do not drink coffee, as they actually have done this in this study. Not that this is perfect either, the Scandinavian people who actually do not drink coffee have already pre-self-selected themselves, so those people could be unusually attentive health-wise with the things they put in their body and it could be another factor that could affect their lack of Glaucoma precursors.

    2. Re:Other explanations by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      Scandinavia gets stronger sunlight than other regions.

      Dude, have you been there? I get more sunlight in my mom's basement than a Scandinavian lying on a Helsinki beach.

  6. Not statistically significant? by Tepar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the abstract:
    Compared with participants whose cumulatively updated total caffeine consumption was <125 mg/day, participants who consumed 500 mg/day had a trend toward increased risk of EG/EGS that was not statistically significant (RR = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–2.08); P trend = 0.06).

    If it's not statistically significant, then how can we take this seriously?

    1. Re:Not statistically significant? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You're cherry picking a bit. The difference between (this specific form of) glaucoma rates between moderate (one cup) drinkers and less moderate (3+ cup drinkers) was not statistically significant. The difference between caffeine abstainers (those sad examples of humanity) and any caffeine addict was (barely) statistically significant.

      However, all that says is that the the argument that "the association of caffeine intake and certain forms of glaucoma using this data set and these assumptions (the confounder regression)" is unlikely to be caused simply by chance. It says nothing else.

      For that and a couple of other reasons, I would not go running out and switching to decaf.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Not statistically significant? by stephanruby · · Score: 1

      From the abstract:

      Compared with participants whose cumulatively updated total caffeine consumption was <125 mg/day, participants who consumed 500 mg/day had a trend toward increased risk of EG/EGS that was not statistically significant (RR = 1.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98–2.08); P trend = 0.06).

      If it's not statistically significant, then how can we take this seriously?

      Can someone translate the next phrase for me?

      Compared to abstainers, those who drank 3 cups of caffeinated coffee daily were at increased risk of EG/EGS (RR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09–2.54; P trend = 0.02).

      Does this mean that compared to the abstainers of coffee, the results are indeed significant??
      Can someone tell me what those numbers mean, and how they compare to the previous numbers.

      Because in their conclusions, they seem to imply that they found something:

      Conclusions. We observed a positive association between heavier coffee consumption with risk of EG/EGS in this large prospective study.

  7. Pluheese.... by bagboy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone should read the article a little better instead of posting some inflaming title... FTFA, "participants who consumed 500 mg/day had a trend toward increased risk of EG/EGS that was not statistically significant". Notice the "not statistically significant" part? Also, " We did not find associations with consumption of other caffeinated products". Way to panic!

    1. Re:Pluheese.... by Mr.+Frilly · · Score: 1

      Read the next line: "Compared to abstainers, those who drank 3 cups of caffeinated coffee daily were at increased risk of EG/EGS (RR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09–2.54; P trend = 0.02)."

      Still, given that there were 120,000 data points in this study, and they don't seem to be correcting for multiple comparisons, I would think a P of 0.02 is pretty weak.

  8. Coffee and wine are the fashionable miracle cures by blahbooboo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So in the last 6-12 months coffee and red wine have been show to prevent pretty much everything -- heart disease, dementia, hypertension, aging etc.
    Pop science is so tiring. Fact is all of these studies are incredibly dependent on the population.

    The only thing know for sure is living is hazardous to your health...

  9. Re:OK... Next question: by baenpb · · Score: 1

    So as a followup study, find the relationship between coffee consumption and compulsive masturbation? Could possibly be linked, based on personal anecdotal evidence.

  10. Re:OK... Next question: by lorenlal · · Score: 1

    Indeed. If it shows strong correlation, the /. userbase is going to have to learn braille...

  11. Translating by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2

    For 80k women, there were a total 360 cases (.45%).

    The increase was higher for women in families who already had a history of glaucoma.

    The link was specific to caffeinated coffee and wasn't found for other products (Tea, Chocolate, decaffeinated coffee)

    There was a tiny statistically significant increase compared to abstainers.

    I.e. take those 360 cases, and say there were 160 cases among abstainers and 200 cases among caffeinated coffee drinkers. So the actual increased number of cases due to drinking caffeinated coffee in the population of 80k women may have been something like .05%. This is a rough swag. The actual increase was:
    "increased risk of EG/EGS (RR = 1.66; 95% CI, 1.09â"2.54; P trend = 0.02)"

    So give up a lifetime of drinking coffee, the other benefits of drinking coffee in return for reducing your risk of Glaucoma very very slightly.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  12. Tradeoffs by gknoy · · Score: 1

    So, we need to avoid coffee to avoid going blind, or drink it regularly so that we don't get Alzheimer's?

  13. Re:OK... Next question: by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it means that you should stop reading dumb clinical articles taken out of context on Slashdot.

    This is just one of those hundreds of thousands of medical articles trawling the data for a correlation so somebody can chase after another grant. According to TFA, they reviewed records of almost 79000 people and came up with 360 cases of this particular form of glaucoma. Then they take the self reported caffeine intake, adjust for 'other confounders' (waves hands) and come up with a weak (Relative Risk 1.4) association that is barely statistically significant and likely not clinically significant at all.

    Hrumphh. Not impressed

    (Goes back to quaffing his Nuclear Waste level caffeinated beverage)

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. researchers bone up by cellurl · · Score: 1

    Ok, I didn't read diddly squat, but I will go out on a limb and say that the researcher didn't speak to a common audience.

    Researchers need to publish cliff-notes at a level that high-schoolers would understand. We all assume the study was "local" and flawed, but the "cliff-notes" would address that right up front!

    Help eliminate stupid speeding tickets"

  15. That's lucky by Hentes · · Score: 2

    So tea is still safe. Now if only there was a safe alternative to masturbation I wouldn't have to worry about my vision at all.

  16. remember folks, add weed to your coffee by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    remember folks, add weed to your coffee.

    It will both prevent glaucoma and take the harsh edge off the coffee buzz.

    1. Re:remember folks, add weed to your coffee by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It will also help prevent cancer. That's right, they tried to prove pot causes cancer and got the exact opposite answer they were looking for.

    2. Re:remember folks, add weed to your coffee by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Any kind of smoke in your lungs will contribute to cancer. You will only be preventing cancer if you take ingest it or absorb it through the skin, best not to inhale.

    3. Re:remember folks, add weed to your coffee by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      There's no smoke if you crush it and put it in the coffee.

      Also, they did a study a couple of years ago to measure pot use vs cigarette use. They had four groups of older people: pot smokers, cigarette smokers, smokers of both and nonsmokers. Since, as you point out, all inhaled smoke is carcinogenic, they expected those who smoked both to have the highest cancer rates. Instead, those who smoked both had half the cancers than those who only smoked cigarettes, and those who smoked only pot actually had fewer cancers than nonsmokers, although the number was statistically insignificant. The results made them theorize that pot contains some anti-cancer component and now they're looking for it.

      I'd like to see people who didn't smoke but ate pot daily added to that study.

  17. Solution. by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Coffee AND 24" screen it is then.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  18. Caffeine by gnurfed · · Score: 1

    Caffeinated coffee? That's just "Coffee" - add words if you've taken away the good stuff, not when it's au naturel.

    1. Re:Caffeine by geekoid · · Score: 1

      They need to be specific and indicate WHAT in the coffee they were watching.
      Science needs to be specific, get used to it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. Statistically Meaningless Conclusions by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sorry, their conclusions are just not statistically justified.

    Let me review what they found:
    Compared total caffeine consumption of less than 125 mg/day to greater than 500 mg/day: no significant result
    Compared abstain from caffeinated coffee to greater than 3 cups of caffeinated coffee daily: glaucoma relative risk in the interval 1.09 to 2.54
    Compared consumption of (caffeinated soda, caffeinated tea, decaffeinated coffee or chocolate) to non-consumers of same: no significant result

    That relative risk that they quote as being significant has a confidence interval with a lower end of 1.09; which is only barely above 1.0 (1.0= no effect). So, they studied one particular variety of one particular minor disease (of many health effects). Finding one effect at a trivial level is meaningless.

    Ob xkcd: http://xkcd.com/882/

    --
    http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    1. Re:Statistically Meaningless Conclusions by frosty_tsm · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On top of this, why were people drinking so much coffee? Because they were working long days? Staying up late? Other activities that can lead to eye strain?

      Sorry but this sounds like correlation rather than causation.

    2. Re:Statistically Meaningless Conclusions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      not to mention a test in a country with a huge number of people with light colored eyes,
      where daylight is extremely short for large portions of the year

      nono - no people with highly sensitive eyes here

    3. Re:Statistically Meaningless Conclusions by Slime-dogg · · Score: 1

      On top of this, why were people drinking so much coffee? Because they were working long days? Staying up late? Other activities that can lead to eye strain? Sorry but this sounds like correlation rather than causation.

      While a decent point, I'm pretty sure coffee is very much a cultural thing for those up near the arctic circle. It might have something to do with the lack of sunlight, so compensation is made with caffeine.

      --
      You need to restart your computer. Hold down the Power button for several seconds or press the Restart button.
    4. Re:Statistically Meaningless Conclusions by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      I don't think that eye strain is linked to any significant vision disease. They claim a link to a form of glaucoma, not just poor vision.

  20. Re:OK... Next question: by Pope · · Score: 1

    So, does this mean it's time to start evaluating a possible reason?

    I ask because I love my coffee. Seriously, I'm stupid for it... But the last thing I need is another activity that supposedly makes me go blind...

    So keep drinking coffee, just drink less of it each time. I've cut down in a major way over the last year, but I still need two a day to keep me awake and my brain working. I just drink way less both times.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  21. Everything kills you. by metrometro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's all fatal. Some faster than others, I admit, but everyone eventually becomes infirm and dies and causality is pretty firm linked to existing in the world and doing things.

    So, can we have good regulators to worry about stuff like Chromium in tap water and just start ignoring the really subtle stuff?

    1. Re:Everything kills you. by metrometro · · Score: 1

      Google's variety of Chromium is a nutrient. Just don't open six tabs at once.

    2. Re:Everything kills you. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Fatal: Causing or capable of causing death.

      Not everything is fatal. Sure, based on the evidence it is highly likely everyone will die, but you can't not say everyone until everyone has become infirm or died. ... really subtle stuff?:
      so you magically know what is subtle and not? Please, let us know how you can not the effects of everything and determine what is subtle.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Re:OK... Next question: by Dogbertius · · Score: 1

    So, does this mean it's time to start evaluating a possible reason?

    I ask because I love my coffee. Seriously, I'm stupid for it... But the last thing I need is another activity that supposedly makes me go blind...

    Then stop! Not only does it make you go blind, but gawd kills a kitten every time you do it too!

  23. on the other angle... by nerdyalien · · Score: 1

    coffee drinkers are more white-collar, sedentary types who read lot of documents either physical ones or on a LCD screen for the most part of the day... and at occasions, under poor lighting. Isn't this the cause of losing eye-sight ??

    Personally, I consume reasonable amount of coffee daily basis and I am close to 30 now. So far I can manage reading without glasses. Since 2 years ago or so, I get very tired reading... somewhat an early sign of losing eye sight. Before that, for 10 years or so, I used to study + code... seems all these heavy duty work is paying the price.. not the coffee...

    1. Re:on the other angle... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "coffee drinkers are more white-collar, sedentary types who read lot of documents either physical ones or on a LCD screen for the most part of the day..."

      I dare you to say that at a foundry, you'll get chucked into a furnace and melted down.

      Lowest of the blue collars drink far more coffee than any white collar type.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:on the other angle... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Lowest of the blue collars drink far more coffee than any white collar type."
      mmm, I would guess that's not true. White collar workers who drink coffee tend to drink coffee while working. Not a lot of blue collar workers can drink coffee while performing their job.

      That's just speculation, of course.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  24. Dammit! by Lumpy · · Score: 1, Funny

    I upped my coffee intake to stave off Dementia and Alzheimer disease... bot now I'm gonna go blind....

    Give a guy a break will ya scientists?

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  25. Coffee != Caffeine by Theovon · · Score: 1

    A lot of people seem to associate coffee and caffeine, but all around the world, people get caffeine from other sources. Tea, chocolate, guarana, etc. Caffeine is not the only ingredient in these things that might affect you. For instance, the primary stimulant in cocoa is actually Theobromine.

    One interesting example is a COFFEE ALLERGY. It doen't occur very often, but it does happen, and more often than with tea, for instance. Caffeine suppresses immune response (i.e. histamine production associated with an IgE reaction) to a limited degree and may therefore mask a mild allergy to other proteins found in the coffee. So you may not have any immediate allergy symptoms. But it does have an effect, and in the long term, it can lead to psychological disorders.

  26. Breakfast form once and for all by theedgeofoblivious · · Score: 3

    Doctors, can you please clarify this? Eating breakfast is becoming a terrifying experience. (Circle all that apply)

    Coffee is good / bad for you.
    Eggs are good / bad for you.
    The healthier topping for my toast is butter(which has lots of saturated fat) / margarine(which is trans fat) .

    I anticipate the stories of how whole wheat toast is secretly the cause of cancer.

    1. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      My fiancee is on a low-carb, medium-fat, high-protein diet, with once-a-week high-carb binge days. Under this diet and literally zero exercise, she has managed to lose an average of about 1-2 pounds per week, consistently for several months.

      After nearly a year of this diet, it got kinda old. So she tried to be responsible, added some fruit and whole grains and milk to her diet, basically moved to medium-everything. Still avoided processed grains like white bread. Suddenly she started to gain nearly a pound a day. After almost two weeks switched back to the low-carb, high-protein version and lost the weight almost as fast as she gained it

      It's been interesting to watch, but I think I'm beginning to see that humans just aren't meant to consume large amounts of carbs 24/7/365.24, and our bodies don't know what to do with it all.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    2. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by rogueippacket · · Score: 2

      ... and literally zero exercise

      I think I found a bigger problem than her diet.

      ... our bodies don't know what to do with it all.

      See previous. Carbs = energy = exercise.
      It's sad that this notion of less weight = more health has been distilled into our brains. Your body needs exercise, and it needs a balanced diet. Your weight will change depending on what you eat, when you eat it, how much you eat. And for the love of all things, get a better measure than weight. Your weight can fluctuate 5-10 lbs per week, stop fixating on it. Use your weigh scales only for measuring the weight of your suitcase before a flight - judge your fitness level instead by how far you can run, how high you can jump, and how long you can stay on your bike, how much better you get month after month.

    3. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by geekoid · · Score: 1

      A cup of coffee with an eff and a piece of toast is fine.
      two eggs, bacon toast 2 coffee pack with cream and sugar is not fine.

      pre1950 or so, the Average american breakfast was a cup of coffee and toast. The 'farmers breakfast' was creating for marketing.

      While the media likes to paint good/bad many times that not it at all. It's usually a property of the item that was study. Add to the the media makes every study sound like it's the final study; in fact you need several studies to begin to be informative. There are exception, but not a lot.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, it a by product of watching your diet. Once you do that, regardles of the 'diet' you will do better, and then cave with time. Usually your brain will start rationalizing the behavior. Classic human behaviour.

      Eat balanced and light and make it the way you eat. Not a diet. Binging is bad. Any diet the recommends that should be ignored.

      Our bodies know exactly what to do with it. Save it for an emergency.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      High protein diets make you lose weight because they shake impair metabolism.

      Thanks for your concern, but it's not like we haven't done any research. *Prolonged* high protein diets impair metabolism and risk liver damage because the body enters ketosis. That's why there's a weekly carb binge, this prevents the body from entering full-blown ketosis.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    6. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      The point was to stress that this diet was working in the total absence of exercise, not that she doesn't exercise at all anymore. She has been gradually introducing exercise into her routine. Her previous diet included an hour of exercise every day and dietary changes and she was struggling to lose a pound a month.

      And your psychoanalysis of "less weight = more health" completely leaves out the fact that being overweight is in fact not healthy either. She's not trying to be some stick figure (yuck!), she wants to be a healthy weight. Her family has a history of diabetes and some of her immediate relatives are obese, so this is a pretty major concern for her.

      Over a week, her diet is actually pretty balanced in terms of intake from various sources of energy. The important thing is that almost all processed food has been removed.

      She weighs herself once a week, always on the same day, always at the same time. This is not an obsession, like some anorexic. It's a statistical measure. That's why we know the effect that carbs like whole grains and fruits have had on her.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    7. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by caluml · · Score: 1

      I anticipate the stories of how whole wheat toast is secretly the cause of cancer.

      If you burn it, it is.

    8. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      No, just watching her diet is NOT enough. Her previous diet was balanced, and involved whole grains, fruits, and an hour of exercise every day. She even counted calories to make sure she didn't go over the daily recommended amount. She was lucky to lose a pound a month, if that. Carbohydrate restriction alone has proven to be far more effective, and doubly so in concert with exercise.

      Contrary to your recommendation to ignore diets that incorporate a binge day (got any scientific evidence to support this? After all, humans have adapted over thousands of years to annual binge days otherwise known as "feasts")...the binge day is key to the way this diet works, for two primary reasons.

      For one, a prolonged low-carb diet puts the body into ketosis, which is really hard on your liver. The weekly binge day prevents her from entering full-blown ketosis.

      For two, it gives her something to look forward to. She can eat all the junk she wants one day a week. She practically lives for Saturday. It is perhaps the only reason she has been able to stay true to the diet for a year, because the desire to "cheat" is minimized because of the weekly cheat day.

      Her body does not need to save THAT much carbohydrate. People's bodies are not perfect metabolically. They can be overzealous in their desire to store away for an emergency, especially given that in first world countries we don't have food emergencies anymore. This is particularly true given that her family has a history of diabetes and obesity, so the intentional removal of excess carbs is probably a Good Thing for her long-term health.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    9. Re:Breakfast form once and for all by suss · · Score: 1
  27. Really? by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

    If that's the case then half the people of Seattle should be walking with a cane. People there drink a LOT of coffee. I'd like to see a few more studies before I buy into this one.

    1. Re:Really? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      If that's the case then half the people of Seattle should be walking with a cane. People there drink a LOT of coffee.

      That explains the Microsoft bugs
         

  28. Just a thoguht by cyberzephyr · · Score: 1

    If it is not illegal, Immoral or causes cancer it's just not good for you :-)

    --
    I'm here for the experience, not the Hyperbole.
  29. Re:Indirect explanations by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    people who drink coffee are less likely to smoke pot

    What? Almost every pothead I know loves to drink coffee. Caffeine is the perfect counterbalance to the lack of motivation pot sometimes causes. Especially if you make some pot cream and add that directly to the coffee - like a "hippie speedball".

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  30. Re:OK... Next question: by jd2112 · · Score: 1

    Or stop drinking when you need glasses.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  31. Okay, another coffee study! Let's get to it! by multicoregeneral · · Score: 1

    And wait five minutes for the next one, which will of course sight different evidence, and say the opposite thing.

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank.
  32. I'm screwed by sa1lnr · · Score: 1

    Coffee and wanking. :(

  33. caffeinated coffee by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    WTF? Isn't that what is called 'Coffee'? Caffeine isn't artificially introduced into coffee. It's part of coffee.

    1. Re: caffeinated coffee by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Coffee" is a set of prepared drinks that also included decaffeinated coffee.
      "Caffeine" is a set that includes more then Coffee.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  34. But I drink a ton of coffee! by SkOink · · Score: 1

    Not sure what those researchers wrote - I don't see any problem here!

    --
    ---- I'll take you in a Hunt deathmatch any day.
  35. Sorry, but this is not a good idea by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, I work on medical studies in research all the time, and virtually ALL of them say that moderate caffeine consumption is good for you.

    Cardiovascular risk factors are much more of a risk for far more people than vision problems are.

    When you get old your eyesight will go. Deal with it.

    Now step away from my double shot espresso or someone is going to get hurt ...

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  36. Re:OK... Next question: by Proteus · · Score: 1

    This is why I hate science reporting. This kind of study exists entirely to obtain funding for higher-quality research. But it's getting reported as though it were conclusive. The way research of most types works is that you do a cheap, low-quality study that tells you whether there's an interesting enough thing happening to warrant a more-expensive, more-thorough study. In this case, the conclusion is basically "hey, it's possible that caffeine intake might be a factor in glaucoma; we should really do more than just case review and self-reporting to see if it's real." But all we're going to hear about from the media now is how coffee makes you blind.

    --
    We may not imagine how our lives could be more frustrating and complex—but Congress can. – Cullen Hightower
  37. It has to be the di-hydrogen monoxide content by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1, Funny
  38. Re:Indirect explanations by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Caffeine doesn't motivate.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Re:Indirect explanations by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

    It sure motivates my bladder.

    --
    "But this one goes to 11!"
  40. Fuck off. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

    I was fucking blind before I started drinking fucking coffee.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
  41. According to the abstract by Burz · · Score: 1

    3 cups or more per day is bad for your eyes.

    And its not a longevity thing but a quality of eyesight thing. I know people who drink lots of coffee and got this condition before they hit middle age (I think stress had something to do with it, but the excess coffee might have hurt them). It will be interesting to see if future studies agree with this paper.

  42. interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So if I drink enough coffee, I can get a prescription for pot?

    Sounds good to me.

  43. *yawn* by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    Another day. Another study that finds something bad for you/kills you.

  44. Eat Bitter Dark Chocolate by YaddaMinski · · Score: 1

    Eat bitter dark chocolate (over 70% cocoa and make sure not dutched, alkalized) with coffee. The cocoa lowers blood pressure. So net good.