Slashdot Mirror


High-Voltage Fences For Zapping Would-Be Copper Thieves

coondoggie writes "It may be a gimmick or the ultimate answer, but a California city this week okay-ed a draft ordinance that would let businesses install 7,000-volt electric fences to protect sites from rampant copper thieves. As reported by the Sacramento CBS station, the reaction from one business owner to the ordinance says it all: 'It'll be a little fun to watch one of these guys get electrocuted holding my fence trying to rob me.'"

363 comments

  1. Yikes... by SIGBUS · · Score: 5, Funny

    Coming soon: "Don't Whiz on the Electric Fence" championship edition.

    --
    Oh, no! You have walked into the slavering fangs of a lurking grue!
    1. Re:Yikes... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Informative

      When I was ten (half a century ago), by buddy actually did piss on an electric fence. Poor kid lay there screaming for ten minutes, but there was no permanent damage. I think this is an excellent idea; farmers and ranchers have been using electric fences to keep their animals in for decades, and I have yet to hear of anyone being harmed.

    2. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      They tested pissing on an electric subway rail and that failed. They then tried the electric fence and it did work. Perhaps you should have watch the WHOLE episode before commenting here.

    3. Re:Yikes... by aevan · · Score: 5, Informative

      The busted the third rail, but found electric fence plausible. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_(2004_season)#Peeing_on_the_Third_Rail

    4. Re:Yikes... by emho24 · · Score: 1

      Then mythbusters is wrong or tested wrong. I pissed on an electric fence at my grandads house when I was little, it was hidden in the tall weeds. It hurts.

      --
      You must gather your party before venturing forth.
    5. Re:Yikes... by Roachie · · Score: 1

      Yea, they busted the story about the guy who shot his balls off by sticking a .22 in the fuse box of his truck. You can electrically fire rimfire bullets. The story is true( let me introduce you to google ) and I have seen it done( the shooting bullets part, I have never seen anyone get shot in the sack )

      These guys a smart, witty and fun to watch. Absolute authorities... not so much.

      --
      This sig is not paradoxical or ironic.
    6. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so you know, Mythbusters busted that myth.

      But keep telling the story.

      Mythbusters is to science what the morning comics are to literature. They only thing they p*ss on is the scientific method itself. The show should be renamed "Leaping to Conclusions Based on Incomplete Data With Special Effects and Explosions", but I guess that's not as catchy. That supposedly intelligent people use an episode of Mythbusters as proof in any argument makes me weep for our education system.

    7. Re:Yikes... by EETech1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      About 30 years ago I fell victim to the older neighbor kids when i had to pee. They told me to go behind the shed, but don't piss on the shed because my dad will get mad, so i went with my back to the shed and pissed right on an electric fence. It got me 3 times before I figured out what the hell was going on, and turned away. No damage, just a wee bit sore for a few hours.

      I don't care what the Mythbusters say, it is possible, I know it is, and my older neighbors all laughed having suckered another person into pissing on it, so I wasn't the first one with a painful experience behind that shed!

      My(BZZZZT)th Conf(BZZZZT)irm(BZZZZT)ed

      Owww!

      Cheers...

    8. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, that is kinda catchy. I'm gonna start using it. I might shorten it to LCBID though.
      Especially useful on Slashdot.

    9. Re:Yikes... by Hentes · · Score: 1

      They did manage to get the bullets to fire, but they couldn't hit the driver with them. The bullets went everywhere in the car though, I was also surprised they didn't judge it as plausible.

    10. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I dare you to pee on the fence."
      "I'M NOT AN IDIOT!"
      "Okay, you're right. You're right. Sorry. I dare you to touch the fence with this green weed I just pulled." :)

    11. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was probably the casings which went everywhere, since they weigh a fraction of the bullet. Without a tube to contain the and direct the expanding propellent, they just fly apart from one another, without gaining significant energy. Ejected casings from an autoloading rifle will have more energy and momentum--and they're not known for being anything other than annoying, generally. Wouldn't want to catch one in the eye.

    12. Re:Yikes... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      "its got electrolytes. its what the body craves!"

      bzzzzt.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    13. Re:Yikes... by psiclops · · Score: 1

      You mean the show that confirmed it as possible.

      Variations on the original: * Electrified Third Rail: tested with an electric fence instead and found that an electric fence can shock you if you pee on it. confirmed

      --
      i spent five minutes thinking and all i got was this crappy sig
    14. Re:Yikes... by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      Time for a latte!

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    15. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from Canada. Maybe they are wired different here, but when we were young we used to grab the electric fence quickly and poke other people. You would feel it, but usually it surprised the other person and made them jump when it shocked them too. It wasn't really that painful.

    16. Re:Yikes... by EETech1 · · Score: 2

      Having worked on farms for about 10 years growing up, it's something you get used to. Although the "weedburner" type fencers have quite a bit more jolt, and the newer fencers will adjust the output depending on the load from the moisture in the grass, and the length of the fence to give the right amount of zap.

      I still remember seeing the output knob on the fencer that got me turned all the way up with the overrange light blinking indicating it was turned up too high. They had the field behind the shed sectioned off into 4 parts for grazing, and depending on how the gates were set (some days it wasn't even hot behind the famous shed!) the electrified portion of the fence could be 1 - 4 miles long, but the farmer controlled the output knob and it remained on 11 no matter what.

      IIRC the fencer said it was good for 10 miles of fence, and could easily jump 1/2". I bought it at the sale they had when they quit raising cows and still have it to this day for various activities requiring a remote ignition source. Somewhere along the line I removed the cover lots of resistors, and the knob, and now it's just set on kill. If there's no wire on the output terminal it easily jumps a loud purple spark 3/4" from the top of the insulated output screw to the case.

      I wouldn't wanna piss on it now!

    17. Re:Yikes... by formfeed · · Score: 1

      It got me 3 times before I figured out what the hell was going on, and turned away. No damage, just a wee bit sore for a few hours.

      I bet it gave you superpowers.

    18. Re:Yikes... by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is known as the "Pournelle Solution". See Yet Another Modest Proposal, by Larry Niven.

      It is named after Jerry Pournelle's proposed solution for radioactive waste disposal. It works like this:

      [1] Find an historically (and consistently) arid region.

      [2] Pile up your radioactive waste in the middle,

      [3] build a fence around it, say maybe 100 miles radius. Then

      [4] put signs on the fence, in several languages, that say "If you cross this fence, you will die."

      [5] End of problem.

      I may not have gotten Jerry's words exactly right, but this is the gist of his suggestion.

    19. Re:Yikes... by davester666 · · Score: 1

      That happens when you pee on the Uranium pile...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    20. Re:Yikes... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      I have never seen anyone get shot in the sack

      www.ogrish.com

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    21. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's a naive solution without some sort of very expensive commitment to preventing material removal. It is also extremely wasteful. There are several safe ways to get rid of it, use it up, 'burn' it up, convert it, or store it. When storing it you want to keep access to it because it should become far more valuable than it is now.

      Currently there is money in spent radioactive waste when recovered for peaceful uses but it is now public policy to prevent that. It has historically been shown that processors are never trustworthy enough and the damage they can do with the waste is a level above what a terrorist would do. The terrorist wants attention so their act is short lived. The unethical processor would hide and obfuscate dangerous criminal acts allowing nuclear materials time to migrate and do more damage.
      Government has shown it is incompetent to run or even manage such recovery operations as part of defense. It is not clear if DOE as a civilian government agency would fare any better.
      There are so many useful things in nuclear waste it is tragic that we cannot be ethical enough either in the public or the private sector to take the risk of allowing a for profit processor to handle such materials.

    22. Re:Yikes... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      They got the bullets to fire but bullets fired outside of a confined metal tube aren't very dangerous so they busted that part of the myth.

      --
      No sig today...
    23. Re:Yikes... by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      It was actually a second FOLLOWUP episode...

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't watch the episode... but If you piss on a fence your probably standing on the ground (hence you will be electrocuted) If you piss on the third rail of a train, you are probably standing on a wooden deck (hence not grounded, and not electrocuted) How can a bird sit on a wire? you could probably stand on the third rail and not get zapped.. Electricity follows the path of least resistance. It will not flow through an insulator like wood, or air. You will not get zapped unless you are connected to ground or something that transfers electrons more easily than the steel rail it'self.

    25. Re:Yikes... by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Animals can't read. Climate is changing, hard to say what the weather will be like in 500 years time. Deep burial is really the only option I'm afraid.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    26. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nice troll

    27. Re:Yikes... by rwise2112 · · Score: 1

      It got me 3 times

      Fool me once, shame on you.....

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    28. Re:Yikes... by bzipitidoo · · Score: 1

      You don't know stupid, if you think that was foolish.

      Heard of a dog that got jolted by an electric fence, and took it as a challenge. The dog bit down on the wire and would not let go. Would get zapped every few seconds, growl, and clamp down harder. After many minutes of this, the farmer finally turned off the fence to get that dog away from it.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    29. Re:Yikes... by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      In railway and subway systems, the third rail is electrically zoned into sections. For example, for safety and other reasons, in the area at the platforms, there is no power until a train rolls in. When the last car is out of the zone, power is disconnected.
      In the open, no power is applied either, and that is to protect small rodents, deer, and stupid humans.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    30. Re:Yikes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They should just electrify the actual metal the thieves are trying to steal and hide the transformer (with a nice beefy lead acid battery) somewhere as opposed to trying to set up an arbitrary electrified perimeter fence around it. Unless you have actual electronics connected to the wiring (like a computer plugged into the outlet, which is ulikely during construction), I can't see why this approach couldn't work. Household wiring doesn't contain components that are very voltage sensistive like microchips (yet) or diodes. Just switches, plugs, and other things that are made for household current (which would be of a far greater magnitude than even a nasty shock circuit). Or in other words, any shock transformer that can be (safely) powered by a standard outlet cannot possibly deliver more current (as a shock) than an identical wall outlet can safely convey. I am saying this as a person who designs these types of system for living, but you are welcome to question my logic on that one.

      Amps Vs. Volts, they are two properties of the same phenomenon. Allthough this is not a strictly perfect metaphor, the best way to think about the difference is that volts are like the 'pressure' of the electrical force, while amps decribe the total quantity or 'flow rate' of the electrons. Think in terms of how forcefully vs. how much the water comes out of your tap. The human body has a very high resistance, so many volts are necessarry for the electricity to affect a part of the body that is physically distant from the place where it is applied. In order to have a strong effect on the body, enough current needs to be delivered to have any effect on the body part it is crossing. Furthermore, *where* the electrical current is applied is the most important factor in regards to human safety. If I were to electrocute you by running current from one foot to the other, even a very high current is mostly just going to burn soft tissue, but nothing accutely fatal. If I were to run a substantially (think orders of magnitude) smaller current directly through your heart (as in electrodes on the surface of it), I could possibly make it stop indefinitely, or at least generate a nasty heart attack. In short, it is not *only* current, but if you need to focus on one measurement in regard to human safety, current is the most sensible option because it better describes the danger. Much like radioactivity exposure measurement, it is not a simple calculation, but there are some general SI units that seem to match the danger proportionately enough to be a reasonably good metric.

    31. Re:Yikes... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Then mythbusters is wrong or tested wrong.

      ... or they tested a situation different to the one you encountered.

      I've seen the main version of that "Myth Busters" (a follow up is mentioned above, which I don't think I've seen) : they were testing pissing on a "third rail" at ground level, by a normal male pissing from (about) a metre above and to the side. The piss stream broke up into droplets, so didn't conduct current back to the pisser.

      You pissing more-or-less directly onto a fence is a different situation - the fence is going to be around pisser level, so there's a different likelihood of there being a continuous piss stream between you and the fence. Which would make both you and Myth Busters not wrong.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    32. Re:Yikes... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      What about the U.S. solution?

      Put it into ammunition and shoot it out in some other country?

      I would get moderated down if I explained the A.

    33. Re:Yikes... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1

      most hot, longlived leftovers can be put back in the reactor and reused . There are a bunch of reason why they're not, but they're mainly political. Curent nuke tech is very wasteful. Don't bury it too deep or our great ^ N grandchildren won't be happy when they've worked out a good way of using it. Getting back to fences - it's a nice idea but havng sen what rural copper thieves do when confronted with a zapper, I don't think it will work as well as intended.

    34. Re:Yikes... by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Bullets are just terrible firecrackers unless there is a barrel to channel the energy. I've set off bullets in a pan on the stove, they just make a loud bang and the case will shoot out of the pan with enough force to make it halfway across the kitchen. Bullet is usually left in the pan since it has more mass.

      You can clear a space by the campfire by throwing some bullets in it, too. They won't make it back out, although the shell sometimes does. The explosion will send embers everywhere and sometimes will blow out the fire!

      A bullet detonating close to a human won't hurt them. The shell might do some damage if it hit the eye, the noise might hurt the ear, and powder burns are no fun, so wear hearing protection, gloves, and safety glasses when playing with bullets.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
  2. If they want to stop the copper thieves... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Start making the recyclers who pay cash for copper keep records and start prosecuting them for receiving stolen goods.

    1. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      This is not an unreasonable solution, but you'll hear it decried as "punishing small business owners", and "deterring recycling". The fact that these aren't really true won't keep opportunistic politicians at bay.

    2. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Hentes · · Score: 3, Informative

      This. Most metal salesmen have a pretty good idea which piece of trash came from illegal sources they just turn a blind eye because it's more profit for them.

    3. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, because regulatory compliance and associated paperwork, government inspections, lawsuits, and penalties impose 0 costs on businesses.

      And since everyone wants to be recorded in government registries, because everyone wants to fill in forms, because everyone is literate enough to fill in forms, it won't deter anyone from recycling either.

    4. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That is the law in my state. Businesses not following it was rampant. But then, the state police started doing stings where they do things like bring multiple faucets or huge amounts of piping and the like. All it takes is one bust and you lose your recycling license for the business and the employee who doesn't report the suspicious transaction can be charged as well, which means they can be unhireable in that business and many others with the felony conviction. Lets just say that that cut into the problem quite a bit in the major cities.

    5. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most places already do this to comply with local laws. Crooks are good at getting around it (and maybe the guy working the counter at the scrap yard doesn't care).

    6. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Improv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I am so glad that systems need to be perfect and costs need to be 0 before we're willing to accept them.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    7. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

      So how is the scrap yard going to match a pile of crumpled up copper pipes back to what was inside your house?

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    8. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Baloroth · · Score: 0, Troll

      Start making the recyclers who pay cash for copper keep records and start prosecuting them for receiving stolen goods.

      So you would punish the innocent with more paperwork and regulations along with the guilty? That doesn't sound very appealing to me. Besides, it's not like thieves wouldn't lie anyways, which would give the recyclers who take stolen goods plausible deniability.

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    9. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody's say it is free, just that it isn't a punishment or generally deterring recycling.

      But hey, let's consider the alternative posited here, electrocutions.

      How much trouble is it to deal with a dead body?

    10. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by firewrought · · Score: 1

      Start making the recyclers who pay cash for copper keep records and start prosecuting them for receiving stolen goods.

      That's what other states have done, but the fence is more amusing.

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    11. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      had a case here where thieves were emptied a graveyards for brass letters from the gravestones and iron fences etc. it wasn't until the second or third time they did it
      the scrap dealer called the police because he wondered where they got it from

    12. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by viperidaenz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      When was the last time illiterate citizens legally obtained large amounts of copper they want to swap for untraceable cash?

      When was the last time someone not recorded in government registries was in the USA? hint: drivers license, social security number, birth certificate, travel/work visa... I can only think of illegal immigrants.

      Last time I dumped a bunch of copper pipe at a local scrap metal place I had to produce photo ID and fill out a form. I don't live in USA though.

    13. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because regulatory compliance and associated paperwork, government inspections, lawsuits, and penalties impose 0 costs on businesses.

      And since everyone wants to be recorded in government registries, because everyone wants to fill in forms, because everyone is literate enough to fill in forms, it won't deter anyone from recycling either.

      Preventing theft and fraud, though, is a vital part of a free market and an entirely legitimate role of government. There is a cost, certainly, but the cost of crime* is invariably far higher than the cost of policing.

      * where said crimes are actual crimes with real victims and damages suffered.

    14. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      can't really call them any more "innocent", than the guy who buys a plasma at a bar or from the back of a truck at half price

      it is simple just require that all money be paid to an account, creditcard etc. so it can be traced

    15. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by slashmydots · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Start making the recyclers who pay cash for copper keep records and start prosecuting them for receiving stolen goods.

      I deal with a scrap dealer all the time and trust me, what you're saying is so naive and moronic it's off the charts. That wouldn't work for about 100 different reasons. It's the same as a pawn shop. He asks the right questions and sort of gauges the person's behavior but beyond that, you have to take their word for it about where it came from. By the way, I see cops taking gear out of the pawn shop all the time.

    16. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      Not as much as you'd think.

    17. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by gewalker · · Score: 3, Informative

      They passed this in Indiana some years ago, the newspaper generally endorsed it, and the public mostly thought it was a good idea (after all they were not recycling copper frequently, nor were they in the salvage business). I think it is pretty much "sign here" and snap a picture. This did not stop copper theft either.

    18. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      They won't, the guy dropping them off will have to.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    19. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by swb · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Tough shit, they had their chance for the zero regulation solution but their greed and willful ignorance is putting and end to that.

      It was just easy money for them -- the toothless loser driving the '98 Grand Am turning in a few hundred feet of brand-new 00 wire was perfectly willing to accept 30% below melt value for the wire and the owner was happy to resell it as new to the "ask no questions" contractor at a 15% discount below new retail.

      If you want it no regulation, that's fine, but let's make the punishments if you get caught:

      1) Accepting stolen merchandise -- clerk goes to jail
      2) Business is fined 3x the metal value and the metal or its on-site equivilent is confiscated
      3) Three violations in a 12 month period and you lose your recycling license for six months
      4) Two loss of license violations? Company, its owners and officers are barred from engaging in commercial metal recycling for 10 years.

    20. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if a police get a report of a house that had a crapton of copper tubing ripped out of the walls and floors, and then discover a crapload of copper tubing just happened to be sold to a scrap dealer shortly thereafter... it's not exactly a convoluted path to draw a line between the two. And given how much damage and work you'd need to do to rip tubing out of walls and floors, they can probably find some kind of evidence directly linking to the two. Hell, multiple identically-angled cuts from the identical grade copper scrap and what's left in the house is probably a good start, never mind any DNA evidence the thief left at the scene (hair, blood if he cut himself, skin, etc).

      Honestly, it would be trivially easy to link a thief with stolen scrap metal, provided the scrap dealer actually keeps fucking records like he's legally supposed to as is.

      And I happen to work in an industry where I know exactly what type of paperwork the scrap dealer needs, and for how long he legally needs to keep it (note: it's a bit longer than a few days. Try years.)

      Shut down or heavily fine a few scrap yards for buying illegal scrap without keeping proper documentation, and the rest will require valid photo ID to sell to them and have video surveillance of the sale counter before the end of the day.

    21. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Oh yeah, it would be so hard. I guess that's why every pawn shop manages to survive even though the keep sale records.

      All you do is take a picture of the person bring into the copper. Or copy an ID.
      Cheap and quick to do. If this means the price I get for recycling goes don a dollar a ton for copper,, the so be it.

      If you don't want to participate in society, then you aren't getting the benefits of society.
      Someone shows up with pounds of copper material, keeping track of where they get it is reasonable.

      Or do you think tons of stolen copper has no cost on business and government?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    22. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I like how he overlooks the cost to the companies, people, and governments having copper stolen.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    23. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by west · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > but the cost of crime* is invariably far higher than the cost of policing.

      Homeland Security

    24. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh please. You clearly have no clue about any aspect of this at all.

      "So you would punish the innocent with more paperwork and regulations along with the guilty?"
      no. I would make it a regulation to maintain who sells you copper. Just like pawnshops have to do with their merchandise.
      It's not punishment any more then having to maintain fire safety codes is a punishment.

      " That doesn't sound very appealing to me. "
      less appealing then the millions of dollars in stolen copper costs everybody every year? Business who have increased their cost becasue of stolen copper. Government who need to increase the budget becasue of stolen copper. Who do you think pays for that?

      " it's not like thieves wouldn't lie anyways, which would give the recycles who take stolen goods plausible deniability."
      That is why you have a thumb print and picture. When someone who had stolen copper reports it, all the recycles get an alert. If you have the property, you contact the police.
      You give them the idea of the person who bought it.

      It's not hard, or expensive.

      Once people doing the stealing realize they will be held accountable, or can't find anyone to recycle it, copper theft will decrease.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    25. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by PNutts · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Yeah, because regulatory compliance and associated paperwork, government inspections, lawsuits, and penalties impose 0 costs on businesses.

      If you want to see what zero costs looks like, I suggest you turn off Rush and read Upton Sinclair's "The Jungle".

    26. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Where I live, all the pawnshops are tied to the police. SO if they get a report of an item, then can be notified, the police called. They give them the item, the persons thumb print, and copy of ID.

      IF the pawn shop doesn't report it then they get in trouble for buying and/or selling stolen goods.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    27. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want it no regulation, that's fine, but let's make the punishments if you get caught:

          1) 1 to the head.

      FTFY

    28. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      seem to remember seeing a tv show with police checking places with used cars and parts, if they find just one piece with the wrong number and/or no paper work and owner goes to jail

    29. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      That's already been a law for years in many places. Though you don't process someone for "receiving stolen goods" unless they knowingly received stolen goods. And if they knew, obviously they are not going to report it. So, it doesn't really help if the recyclers are crooked and find a way to break the law as well.

      Just like Interstate purchase tax laws shouldn't be necessary because most states that consider it taxable already require you to keep records and report all Internet purchases on your tax return. Yeah... right...

    30. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Except it's already been the law in California for years and so clearly has not been a reasonable solution...

    31. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      So what are they supposed to keep a record of? "Received four copper pipes today of 7', 3', 2' in length".

      And then what? If the thief is even remotely smart, they'll cut down what they steal, and then go around town selling chopped pieces to the various scrappers. And how is anyone going to prove whether they sold legitimate scrap or something that was stolen?

    32. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by mellon · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's illegal to receive stolen goods. Stolen copper is stolen goods. Copper is not something that's routinely recycled. Requiring identification and a paper trail to sell copper is really not my definition of onerous regulation.

      But the real lesson here is that the economy is so bad for people at the bottom that they are willing to go to the effort of stealing copper to make their monthly nut. Stealing copper is _hard_. People don't do it if they have a better alternative. Furthermore, copper theft has a _huge_ amplification value—the cost of replacing stolen copper is way more than the copper is worth.

      What's the real fix for this? Not 7000-volt fences. Social justice. Decent pay for a day's work. Desperation is what leads to copper theft.

    33. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my God that's a BRILLIANT IDEA! Why hasn't anyone thought of it?

      Here's another one: RTFA.

    34. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I run a recycling business in a state where this law has been promoted. On the one hand, I could do it and be at a competitive advantage to other metal recycling companies which would have more trouble complying with the law. On the other hand, if all it takes to pass a law is for it to sound like a good idea, and no one enforces it, then I put up all the systems to ask for personal ID and my competitor doesn't and I look like a jerk. There are not enough smart enforcement people to implement every law which sounds good, and if you try to employ that many you create economic problems beyond the paperwork.

      Experience so far: No good deed goes unpunished. If I do it right, I will have ten times more regulators reviewing my paperwork than there are regulators looking for the recycler who didn't turn in the paperwork in the first place.

    35. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      IMO a balance has to be struck. there is a middle ground between no records at all and expecting people to account for every little peice of pipe/cable they strip out.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    36. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      One problem I see is the US doesn't have any border controls between states. So if some states are strict on scrap metal sales while others don't give a fuck what is stopping the theives simply driving to a state that doesn't give a fuck and selling it there?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    37. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      But the real lesson here is that the economy is so bad for people at the bottom that they are willing to go to the effort of stealing copper to make their monthly nut.

      bubbles, is that you, man??

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    38. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty general sweeping statement there, "Desperation is what leads to copper theft".

      However let's just accept that for argument's sake. A great deal of that desperation has it's source in addictions of various kinds. Social justice is a deeply imperfect solution to addiction.

      However the immediate need is to protect infrastructure, regardless of the underlying sociological cause of the copper theft. Social justice is a long-term answer and will never replace the short-term need to stop a thief in the act.

    39. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Agreed. There are too many in the "it offends my world view that everyone is 100% on their own for everything" category.

      A few simple rules and most copper theft would dry up pronto. The way you do that is to intercept the transaction where the copper is converted to cash. Just follow the money. Some transactions would still get through but if you have traceability to the culprits, you'll have a good shot at catching them on their next crime. Then you get to prosecute for both criminal acts.

    40. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even without social justice, it would probably be cheaper in the long run if the government just flat out bought them drugs.

    41. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      And yet they exist because voter ID laws are wrong.

      There are scrap yards that don't really care of the scrap is stolen or not. They only care if it was stolen from them. Requiring ID or photos or forms filled out won't make much of a difference to them. I know of at least 3 scrap yards that will take a car without a title even (you can literally steal a car from the street and sell it for scrap). All you have to do is cut the motor out and put it in back and take the wheels off before scaling it and the law (in my neck of the woods) doesn't consider it a car any more. But the fine for taking a car without a title is only $200 so they will still make jack from the transaction. Just not as much as they could have.

    42. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Actually, it is not illegal to receive stolen goods. It is illegal to knowingly receive stolen goods. I could hijack a truck load of bubble gum and sell it at my corner store, you come in and buy a pack or two and there is absolutely nothing anyone can do to you other then confiscate the gum. On the other hand, if I go in and steal it, then sell it to you around back for 1/4 the price, there is.

      Also, copper it routinely recycled. When remodeling homes or buildings it is separated from the demolition and generally recycled and replaced with new. This is because you know the insulation and the condition of the copper is good on the new and you aren't installing under rated or potentially damaged wiring into the new addition. Most areas will not clear the electrical outlay if it uses old wiring from the project or another project near by. As soon as it is removed, it is typically not used again in most situation.

    43. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 0

      Preventing theft and fraud, though, is a vital part of a free market and an entirely legitimate role of government. There is a cost, certainly, but the cost of crime* is invariably far higher than the cost of policing.

      The government never spends more to fix a problem, than the economic costs of the problem in the first place? Yes, indeed, central planning invariably turns a profit for society as a whole. Whatever was I thinking?

    44. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      This is more of a problem then just states. Most cities, the local police have jurisdiction, but they don't outside of the city so going to a scrap yard or pawn shop in the county or another city creates the same problem. The county sheriff us generally locked into just the county, so going into another county can recreate the same situation.

      I ran into this once. I had a van broken into. I had to go to all the pawn shops outside of town in order to look for the laptops and other crap taken. The cops said they simply didn't have the jurisdiction or the man power to do it. I tried to get the sheriff to assist the local cops, but I guess there was a jurisdiction issue there too. The state police was the only law enforcement entity with clear jurisdiction across the state, but they do not deal with property crimes like that. It is literally idea for crooks to steal in the next county over and go back the other way a county in order to sell it.

    45. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      At first, I thought you meant the band Rush.

    46. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 0

      " never mind any DNA evidence the thief left at the scene (hair, blood if he cut himself, skin, etc)."

      Dude, have you ever had anything stolen? Did the police give even one fuck to you?

      Perhaps if everyone in the neighbourhoods copper was being ripped off, it would make them look bad enough to do something. But no cop is going to do a DNA test "down at the crime lab" because you lost even a few thousand dollars worth of copper, which I would assume is far more than is contained in your standard 1500 sqft house. For instance, ( http://www.recyclexchange.com/a/view/0415.html ) currently has 1 ton of copper wire for $1200 USD.

      Reality = Insurance pays, you pay more and some crack head gets high. Legalize drugs is the answer.

      --
      -
    47. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Forms? Not a lot is required. On the sales receipt that the junkyard keeps anyway, just record driver's license number and/or social security number of whoever sold the "scrap" to you.

      We had a huge brass nut stolen from work. Damned thing weighed about 70 pounds. Special purpose item, it's made specially for the tie-bars on our machines. I don't know any other equipment that uses such a nut. The thing was shiny-brand-new, waiting to be installed the next morning, when it mysteriously walked out of the plant. $1,800 dollars, just gone, and the machine was going to be down for as long as it took the supplier to get another new nut, and ship it to us.

      Several people spread out, and hit every junk yard within 75 miles, inquiring about that special purpose brass nut. It was located, and the proprietor did indeed have the driver's license number of the person who sold it to him.

      At this point, the story gets really stupid: no charges were filed. The guilty party is still employed. I don't even know if that guy had to pay the junkyard owner back.

      But, a simple driver's license number on the receipt got our nut back, and the machine in operation two days later, which was costing about $15,000 each day it was down.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    48. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      And yet they exist because voter ID laws are wrong.

      So aside from people illegally in the USA, who doesn't have a USA birth certificate or visa?

    49. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      I don't see how installing an electric fence would be any cheaper/easier...

    50. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by firewrought · · Score: 1

      One problem I see is the US doesn't have any border controls between states. So if some states are strict on scrap metal sales while others don't give a fuck what is stopping the theives simply driving to a state that doesn't give a fuck and selling it there?

      Well... time and gas money for one thing. For gangs operating out of major metro areas far from state lines, it kinda makes copper theft uneconomical at current price points. (It also makes other crimes [relatively] more attractive, too. An interesting question to ask would be... what crimes will increase as a result of the legislation?) You won't stop everyone, but legislation like this will be considered successful if it substantially reduces such losses.

      Also, with something like this, the net inevitably gets tighter as more and more states pass similar laws [and notice that article is 4 years old].

      --
      -1, Too Many Layers Of Abstraction
    51. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      With people like this out there, I say double the voltage on the fences.

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    52. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in Orygun, scrap-dealers have had to keep such records for years now. It catches a lot of tweakers, but it's still a long way from a cure.

      I like the electrified fence idea.

    53. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      So what are they supposed to keep a record of? "Received four copper pipes today of 7', 3', 2' in length". And then what? If the thief is even remotely smart, they'll cut down what they steal, and then go around town selling chopped pieces to the various scrappers. And how is anyone going to prove whether they sold legitimate scrap or something that was stolen?

      Material received, from whom received, price paid, date.

    54. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by scared+masked+man · · Score: 1

      Copper is not something that's routinely recycled.

      Yes it is: most of the scrapyards in my city will take copper, both clean and plastic coated. I used to sell quite bit of old wire to a friend who worked in a scrapyard (who delivered it there and got staff rates), but they also bought front he general public. Electricians collecting offcuts and removed wire adds up to a decent amount of money.

      Stealing copper is an easy way for an opportunistic thief to make a low-risk profit.

    55. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The thing is that it's a minimal cost. Even just requiring payments to be made in a traceable manner would go a long ways towards solving the problem. If it's a couple handfuls of copper, people are probably not the ones that they're worried about, however, if it's large amounts, those are usually the folks that people are worried about.

    56. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the spam problem. You don't have to catch them all, you just have to raise the risk factor and lower the reward. If you make it a sufficiently big PITA to engage in this kind of criminal activity, it will be greatly reduced. All the morons out there that suggest that we shouldn't do anything about it until we have a perfect solution are ultimately a big part of the problem.

      The more inconvenient it is and the more places they have to go to sell scrap, the more likely it is that they'll get caught. It's not rocket science.

    57. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even without social justice, it would probably be cheaper in the long run if the government just flat out bought them drugs.

      Sell food stamps at a 50% discount for cash, and buy the drugs. It is safer with a drug maintenance program which is legal and cheaper than the street.

    58. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Forms? Not a lot is required. On the sales receipt that the junkyard keeps anyway, just record driver's license number and/or social security number of whoever sold the "scrap" to you.

      Only social security numbers and drivers license numbers? What could possibly go wrong there?

      If somebody buying scrap demands your social security number, surely Radio Shack will move on to taking DNA samples.

    59. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > but the cost of crime* is invariably far higher than the cost of policing.

      Homeland Security

      Of course you omitted:

      * where said crimes are actual crimes with real victims and damages suffered.

      Because that rules out vague wars on terror, drugs, etc.

    60. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      All business accounting deductions have to be documented. All. You can't just tell the IRS, "I spent xxxx dollars to improve the plant, and xxxxxx on supplies". You have to document those expenditures.

      So, how do YOU suggest those expenditures are documented? If the vendor selling the scrap material doesn't have a tax identifier number, you take whatever identity he offers. If nothing else is available, you can write down his license plate number.

      Oh - no license plate on the vehicle he's carrying trash on? And, you're willing to take his scrap with absolutely NO IDENTIFICATION?

      Simple - you're a fence. Enjoy your time at the penitentiary.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    61. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by nospam007 · · Score: 1

      "I don't see how installing an electric fence would be any cheaper/easier..."

      I don't see it either. In Europe they also steal 25000Volt lines, ground a cable to the rails and throw it over the line until it automatically shuts off, then cut it down. I guess this would work on fences as well.

    62. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 0

      > And, you're willing to take his scrap with absolutely NO IDENTIFICATION?

      Yes, we should all be duly deputized enforcers of the government's will, and anyone who doesn't like it should be sent to the reeducation camps.

    63. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      If you can't make a reasonable argument, you can always spout ridiculous nonsense.

      Profit is not the single driving motive that should override any and all other considerations. Sure, you've got to make a profit. But, if you're not willing to make a minimal effort to ensure you are dealing with honest people, then you don't DESERVE that profit!

      Oh - wait! Have I just stumbled over something here? Do you think that you have a RIGHT to profit at other people's expense? "We hold these rights to be self evident" etc. Yeah, there it is, at the top of the list, "Corporate Profit above all else!"

      Give it a break. Fences belong in prison.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    64. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, why is there no jail time for the company owners or management? Without jail time they'll just do it again with new sucker employees.

    65. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My brother works in air conditioning. The companies he services don't want the leftover bits, neither does his boss so he keeps them and cashes in. Generally leaves it until he has a reasonable amount of the things too. No id, no law breaking, and a surprising amount of cash in hand. UK based.

    66. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      So, you first fix all the legitimate ones. Then you send cops around dressed as junkies with handfuls of power line and you throw the book at anybody who buys it without ID. Take the easy money out of the system, and you're only left with serious criminals. However, serious criminals probably have better things to do than electrocute themselves breaking into substations.

    67. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Sure, copper might be routinely recycled by contractors, but it isn't routinely recycled by average people. Contractors won't have any trouble producing ID, and I'm sure the people who deal with them know who they are.

      Just pass legislation requiring that scrap yards be registered, that IDs are recorded when somebody trades copper and made traceable to the items purchased, and that items be held for 7 days before being resold or processed.

    68. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by FireFury03 · · Score: 2

      Reality = Insurance pays, you pay more and some crack head gets high. Legalize drugs is the answer.

      Not that I particularly oppose legalising and regulating drugs, but how does having commercial drugs (hence, not free) prevent a crack head from stealing stuff to pay for the drugs?

    69. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      You know Amazon said that handling a 50x2 table of state tax rates was too complex...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    70. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      You missed the part where I suggested that the states take enforcement actions.

    71. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Zcar · · Score: 1

      Not that simple. There's 100+ different sales tax districts in the state of California alone which would need to be looked up by street address (or at least 5+4 zip, but I'm not sure that's a safe assumption) not by state or even county. Add to that an address in California can be within multiple sales tax jurisdictions with portions of the total sales tax getting sent different places. Amazon might need to collect 7.25% for people on one side of a street but 8% for people on the other and the next block down 8.5%.

    72. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      Material received, from whom received, price paid, date.

      Yes, that already occurs in pretty much every state...

    73. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by saleenS281 · · Score: 1

      This is the spam problem. You don't have to catch them all, you just have to raise the risk factor and lower the reward. If you make it a sufficiently big PITA to engage in this kind of criminal activity, it will be greatly reduced. All the morons out there that suggest that we shouldn't do anything about it until we have a perfect solution are ultimately a big part of the problem.

      The more inconvenient it is and the more places they have to go to sell scrap, the more likely it is that they'll get caught. It's not rocket science.

      You're working off the assumption that you can deter people by making the scrap side of the equation difficult. That would work if you were dealing with a standard thief. This isn't standard thieves, it's generally drug addicts who don't really care if they're going to get jail time. They'll find a way to work the system. I don't recall saying we should do nothing. The options proposed above are just not something that will at all help the problem. The electric fences, however, sound like a great idea.

    74. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every time a building gets damaged, remodeled,or demolished. I see no straightforward way to look at a piece of wire and know if it was stolen.

    75. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Improv · · Score: 1

      You are aware that that's not that hard to program once you have the information, right?

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    76. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by Dahamma · · Score: 1
    77. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by mellon · · Score: 1

      You're not getting the point. If someone is organized enough to steal copper, they are organized enough to do a real job. The only reason they are stealing copper is that they can't get a real job.

    78. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by mellon · · Score: 1

      Perhaps a better way to have expressed that point is that copper is not something that random people routinely recycle. Sure, there's a market for it—it's valuable. But it should be no problem for someone who legitimately got the copper to provide ID and say where they got it, and it should be no problem for the recycler to retain this information.

    79. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by stoatwblr · · Score: 1
      "Not that I particularly oppose legalising and regulating drugs, but how does having commercial drugs (hence, not free) prevent a crack head from stealing stuff to pay for the drugs?"

      Mainly because the reason crack is sold at all is because there's huge profit to be made from it (tens of thousands of percent at street pricing vs actual production costs). Legalised, regulated and taxed drug supplies would cut off the supply of tax-free money to gangs and enable addiction treatment to be handled as a health issue.

      Sensible handling of such issues doesn't feature highly on any politician's resume, anywhere in the world.

    80. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Evidently, there are a lot of people and most of them are democrats. I do remember hearing of an old woman who was born before they routinely issued birth certificates or before they were computerized and the original records were destroyed in a fire making it difficult for her to obtain a copy of it.

      I also know someone who was born in another state and would have to travel to the his birth state/city to obtain a legal copy of his birth certificate. It's not that he doesn't have one, it's that access to it would be a financial burden and weakening the process of getting it would negate most of the security of requiring it. On the other hand, this guy probably isn't someone you would want to encourage to vote.

      Contrived situations or not, there are still possibilities that are somewhat legitimate in appearance. I think they are very few in reality but evidently enough that voter ID laws are bad or something.

    81. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Preventing theft and fraud, though, is a vital part of a free market and an entirely legitimate role of government. There is a cost, certainly, but the cost of crime* is invariably far higher than the cost of policing.

      The government never spends more to fix a problem, than the economic costs of the problem in the first place? Yes, indeed, central planning invariably turns a profit for society as a whole. Whatever was I thinking?

      I said that policing actual crimes like fraud, murder and theft is beneficial overall. I said nothing about central planning.

    82. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      So these people have never paid taxes, otherwise they'd have a social security number. What's the harm in making it harder for them to sell scrap metal?

    83. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      And if policing has an "overall" benefit, how does that justify the *particular* regulations promoted here?

    84. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      And if policing has an "overall" benefit, how does that justify the *particular* regulations promoted here?

      The individuals whose copper is being stolen are being injured by being trespassed, burglarized and robbed, right, often with additional destruction of their property? Again, this is not a victimless crime like drugs. Their material rights are being harmed and the state has and obligations to defend their rights.

      Really, these particular regulations (requiring businesses to track and report who is selling copper) are an extension of the police power to enforce the common prohibition against dealing in stolen property.

      I'm realize that there's a creeping intrusion of government into all aspects of life, and that there are any number of destructive cartels and various nonsense regulations, but I'm still surprised that so many people find this controversial.

    85. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Really, these particular regulations (requiring businesses to track and report who is selling copper) are an extension of the police power to enforce the common prohibition against dealing in stolen property.

      I'm realize that there's a creeping intrusion of government into all aspects of life, and that there are any number of destructive cartels and various nonsense regulations, but I'm still surprised that so many people find this controversial.

      Most everyone supports police power directed at criminals.

      Fewer support police power for a "show us your papers" society, tracking our lawful actions and transactions, and harassing the law abiding with costs and regulations, turning them into criminals when they don't properly fill out the required paperwork.

    86. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      Really, these particular regulations (requiring businesses to track and report who is selling copper) are an extension of the police power to enforce the common prohibition against dealing in stolen property.

      I'm realize that there's a creeping intrusion of government into all aspects of life, and that there are any number of destructive cartels and various nonsense regulations, but I'm still surprised that so many people find this controversial.

      Most everyone supports police power directed at criminals.

      Fewer support police power for a "show us your papers" society, tracking our lawful actions and transactions, and harassing the law abiding with costs and regulations, turning them into criminals when they don't properly fill out the required paperwork.

      Just to be clear, then, do you agree that the state has an obligation to act in this case since people really are being robbed? Because that's why I don't see this as turning us into a "show us your papers society". This action, being an admittedly imperfect remedy to a concrete crime against someone's livelihood, is fundamentally different from all the safety inspections, cartels, stimulus, fake jobs, wealth transfers, price fixing, drugs wars and such that are the hallmarks of the modern welfare/police state.

    87. Re:If they want to stop the copper thieves... by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      Just to be clear, then, do you agree that the state has an obligation to act in this case since people really are being robbed?

      They have an obligation to act *against the criminals involved in an actual crime*, and an obligation to leave law abiding people alone.

      The problem with the stated "solution" is that it doesn't leave law abiding people alone.

  3. Next up: cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If businesses are allowed to do this, PLEASE tell me that they will next allow vehicle owners to similarly trap their cars/trucks from being broken into by theives. I can't think of a good way to 'trap' a window, but the metal door handle? Sure, why not? And I'm sure there's dozens of potential ways to trap a vehicle to deter thieves.

    Some of the ones shown on the old 'stickdeath' site come to mind.

    1. Re:Next up: cars? by plover · · Score: 1

      Go re-watch Robocop, and keep an eye out for the "Magnavolt" car theft deterrent commercial. Best commercial on TV!

      --
      John
    2. Re:Next up: cars? by SternisheFan · · Score: 2

      Go re-watch Robocop, and keep an eye out for the "Magnavolt" car theft deterrent commercial. Best commercial on TV!

      That would be this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRNVxHPJ0hM

    3. Re:Next up: cars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go re-watch Robocop, and keep an eye out for the "Magnavolt" car theft deterrent commercial. Best commercial on TV!

      It was Robocop 2, and the clip is on youtube.

    4. Re:Next up: cars? by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      If businesses are allowed to do this, PLEASE tell me that they will next allow vehicle owners to similarly trap their cars/trucks from being broken into by theives. I can't think of a good way to 'trap' a window, but the metal door handle? Sure, why not? And I'm sure there's dozens of potential ways to trap a vehicle to deter thieves.

      Some of the ones shown on the old 'stickdeath' site come to mind.

      How about one that will just break the thief's arms? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSbjgXbDUzo&feature=related

  4. A lot of fun by plover · · Score: 5, Funny

    It'll be a lot of fun to see the guy's face when they steal his electric fence wire.

    --
    John
    1. Re:A lot of fun by skids · · Score: 1

      Or figure out how to tap it to heat their cardboard boxes.

    2. Re:A lot of fun by NIK282000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Bingo, as stupid as copper thieves are they'll figure out in a hurry that a cheap pair of gloves and some cutters will make short work of an electric fence.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    3. Re:A lot of fun by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      Possibly. but what will they do against my pond with that array of... TESLA COILS behind my fence...

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    4. Re:A lot of fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all of that free electricity!

    5. Re:A lot of fun by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Steal them.
      And apparently many of the people on slashdot think that once they get them off you property, any attempt to prevent them from being sold is a huge crushing blow to humanity.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:A lot of fun by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Possibly. but what will they do against my pond with that array of... TESLA COILS behind my fence...

      A nice Faraday cage suit?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    7. Re:A lot of fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, please put a conductive pair of wire cutters on an active electric fence. Just remember, burnt flesh smells sort of like burnt pork.

    8. Re:A lot of fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -or- steal a pair of jumper cables.

      Attach to fence and ground — put one on each side of were you will climb over / cut through.

      There are many ways to circumvent an electric fence that isn't regularly patrolled. If you have a human guard and/or monitored cameras then you probably dont need the electric fence in the first place. I just don't see a business finding this to be an effective use of funds based on it's ROI. Seems more like an attempt at revenge by some frustrated business owners.

  5. Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Booby trapping is technically illegal in California.

    remember that trial where a business owner was charged in killing a teenager allegedly attempting to loot his store? The store owner rigged a shotgun to go off if hte back door was opened from the outside. It killed the kid, and the owner went to jail. Of course, all of this happened in LA... which is more screwed up than Sacramento.

    1. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by networkBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      But this isn't a booby trap.
      The fences have to be properly signed, and are only allowed in industrial zoned areas.

      Frankly, I think it's a bit overkill, but I totally understand. A local yard was robbed of commercial sized spools of copper wire, had to cost a ton. Even worse, thieves have been opening the access panel on street lights and using their cars to pull the wire out.

      Rancho Cordova (where this passed) has long been seen as a higher crime area, not surprised they're going to these lengths at all.
      -nbr

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    2. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      But if the government gave you permission to put in the booby trap, they might have trouble getting a conviction. But seriously, all this means is the copper thieves will have to use insulated tools to cut the electrified wire first.

    3. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by plover · · Score: 1

      An intentionally lethal trap is illegal. But an electric fence is not necessarily lethal. 7,000 volts is lower than a typical cattle fence.

      However, the thief may end up merely pissed off and vengeful. If he has a lighter in his pocket, this could turn from burglary to arson, and backfire completely on the property owner.

      --
      John
    4. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the copper theft is only a misdemeanor the arson turns it into a felony.

    5. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      I got to thinking though...
      Two grounding rods and a sledge along with some wire.
      Drive the two rods into the ground about 10 feet apart and a foot from the fence.
      Connect wire from the rods to the fence.
      Cut and enter as normal.

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    6. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      But seriously, all this means is the copper thieves will have to use insulated tools to cut the electrified wire first.

      Electric fences can detect when they've been cut, and are often linked to alarms and other security systems (additionally most modern systems can even send you e.g. mobile phone notifications the moment they're tripped, or can be easily programmed to automatically call a security company). Actually, as this business owner has 'tried everything', he probably has existing security systems that the electric fence systems would plug into.

    7. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by mlts · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how this will play out in the civil courts, with the fact that in CA, burglars have gotten compensation because they tripped and fell in the victim's house.

      I also wonder what type of fence is mentioned. In some high security installations, they have stun fences, which are to knock back an intruder as well as sound an alarm inside to alert security, and in prisons, they have kill fences, where the COs are alerted so they can remove the remains.

      Of course, there is the "plain old" electric fence that is used to keep the cows in by delivering electric shocks in pulses slow enough to prevent muscle lock and allow the zapped animal to get away from the fence.

    8. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They better make sure that there's no way to get even close to the electric fence without climbing over or cutting through some other fence. A sign is not enough to keep innocent people safe.

    9. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      I just wonder how this will play out in the civil courts, with the fact that in CA, burglars have gotten compensation because they tripped and fell in the victim's house.

      Citation?

    10. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      It isn't the voltage that kills you.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    11. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by geekoid · · Score: 0

      He hasn't tried putting them in a locked warehouse, or a security guard.
      Dogs would work for most cases.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    12. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      just so you know, just becasue people commit one crime, doesn't mean they will commit any other crime.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I once knew a guy who read that someone reported that happen to his uncles friends neighbors wife's sister.
      I have hear that story in CA for decades, no one can actually site a case.

      IT is one of the lies told to the government by insurance companies who want tort reform. Also the lie about the oven falling on someone and they suing.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      But seriously, all this means is the copper thieves will have to use insulated tools to cut the electrified wire first.

      Electric fences can detect when they've been cut, and are often linked to alarms and other security systems (additionally most modern systems can even send you e.g. mobile phone notifications the moment they're tripped, or can be easily programmed to automatically call a security company). Actually, as this business owner has 'tried everything', he probably has existing security systems that the electric fence systems would plug into.

      Then why would the fence need high voltage? Wouldn't a lower voltage be as effective to detect cutting through? Just make the fence a bit higher (10 ft) so that the thieves need to cut through instead of jumping it.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    15. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      However, the thief may end up merely pissed off and vengeful. If he has a lighter in his pocket, this could turn from burglary to arson, and backfire completely on the property owner.

      On the bright side, the objective is achieved: not being inflammable, the copper will remain on site in case of arson.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    16. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by gagol · · Score: 1

      A motivated thief would simply "rent" a truck and go through...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    17. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by BeanThere · · Score: 1

      Then why would the fence need high voltage?

      Do I really need to answer this, or do you want to think about it for a bit? Hint, some robbers may find massive electric shocks a little off-putting.

    18. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is to leave the thieving bastards' charred corpse in view to send a message to the others.

      7,000V make it 70,000 and few dozen amps just be sure.

    19. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by linatux · · Score: 1

      My electric fence unit is a bit old - only 6000v on a good day. Still don't want a zap from it though!

      But the copper theives over here regularly cut live 230v power lines to steal the copper (not always successfully) - an electric fence isn't going to stop them.

    20. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Then why would the fence need high voltage?

      Do I really need to answer this, or do you want to think about it for a bit? Hint, some robbers may find massive electric shocks a little off-putting.

      While some other idiotic thiefs may find it deadly. Is it a good trade-off?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    21. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      The point is to leave the thieving bastards' charred corpse in view to send a message to the others.

      7,000V make it 70,000 and few dozen amps just be sure.

      You mean gibbeting?
      Seems the humanity (or a certain part of it) is morraly regressing faster than I thought (was expecting an involution to the Nazi era during my lifetime, but... well... Dark Ages seems to be approaching fast).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    22. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Several years ago in my town, a man killed himself trying to steal copper from a live circuit box. He fell down dead right next to his toolbox full of stolen wire and wire stealing tools. His family successfully sued the apartment complex where the circuit box was installed, the city, and the local power company. The city's response to this was an oppressive and possibly illegal new rule requiring inspections of properties every time they change occupants. This rule has lowered property values as nobody wants to move into this oppressive city any more.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    23. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by fibonacci8 · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an open and shot case to me.

      --
      Inheritance is the sincerest form of nepotism.
    24. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I should not lock my doors when I leave because it might perturb the burglars?

    25. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Heck - they've been fried climbing into substations. What were they going to do - bang on a 30kv bus bar with a sledge hammer?

      They're idiots - an electric fence won't stop them. I wouldn't be surprised if they just threw themselves at it looking for weaknesses.

    26. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm afraid that you're overthinking it. Almost any wire works as long as it connects from, say, the wires on one fence post to the wires on the other fence post. I've used this to work on electric fences for livestock. I've *NO* idea why you think you need ground poles, those would short out the fenc to ground, trip the circuit breakers or alerts, and make your actions known all the way back at the crontrollers, and the controllers typically *HAVE* alarms on them for circuit failures. Leaving a fence like that shorted to ground costs money to keep the electricity going!!!!

    27. Re:Cue the murder trial from early 90s... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      You have a good point. I know a guy who renewed his drivers license after pounding a 12 pack down because although drinking and driving didn't bother him, not having a valid license did.

  6. It's not the voltage, it's the current... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 2

    A 10 microfarad, 10kV capacitor makes all the difference.

    1. Re:It's not the voltage, it's the current... by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, people keep saying that, but its not true. Have a read of ohms law. E=I*R and P=E*I (e=voltage, i=current, r=resistance, p=power) If you want to put 50ma through a person who has 2ko of body resistance, you need 100V. That'll pull 5 watts from the fence. If your electric fence is 10kv but can only deliver 1 watt, the voltage will drop to 45V and the current will be 22ma with a 2k load.

      You're pretty safe with anything less than 30ma. Most RCD safety devices wont trip until there is a 30ma leak.

    2. Re:It's not the voltage, it's the current... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, people keep saying that, but its not true. Have a read of ohms law. E=I*R and P=E*I (e=voltage, i=current, r=resistance, p=power) If you want to put 50ma through a person who has 2ko of body resistance, you need 100V. That'll pull 5 watts from the fence. If your electric fence is 10kv but can only deliver 1 watt, the voltage will drop to 45V and the current will be 22ma with a 2k load. You're pretty safe with anything less than 30ma. Most RCD safety devices wont trip until there is a 30ma leak.

      Electric fences are designed to give painful but NOT fatal electric shocks. I've touched one. Hurt like a sonofobitch. Didn't do any permanent damage though. These things won't stop thieves. They're designed to stop animals that can't understand electricity well enough to know that all you have to do is cut the wire or short it out.

    3. Re:It's not the voltage, it's the current... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      30mA through your heart can stop it in a few seconds. Less so, for direct current (HV for fences is usually pulsed or direct current). But it is still quite dangerous.

      With a well insulated electric fence, and a good enough capacitor, you can easily deliver a few amps for a short time, perfectly enough to kill.

      Your body resistance is about 200KOhm but you are an ionic conductor (not metal, or a simple resistor), when you get a shock your resistance drops very significantly. For 7KV I think you can reach 1Amp (with a help of a capacitor).

    4. Re:It's not the voltage, it's the current... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With fast pulses from something like a capacitor, the safety gets a little different and is usually expressed in terms of the total stored energy (although ultimately determined from total delivered energy, which can be less in many set ups). Roughly 10 J is considered dangerous and 50 J is lethal, although there is a lot of variation of conditions and chance of going differently outside that range. Getting the 1 A might be trivial (at least in a small setup, inductance in larger fencing setups might limit your current quite a bit), but getting the 10+ J at high voltage might need more than you can just grab from Radio Shack. Not that it is difficult to order high voltage capacitors with that storage range, just not something you have sitting around (short of collecting a couple microwave over caps and over charging them).

    5. Re:It's not the voltage, it's the current... by __aaltlg1547 · · Score: 1

      Of course you can. But the first time somebody actually does get killed, there's going to be a prosecution and a lawsuit for modifying a normally safe electric fence system to be lethal.

  7. robocop 2 car anti thief system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    old stuff... in robocop 2 they had it way sooner :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7U4ZYOBzEEs

  8. Can we install live web cams by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    to watch the action?

    1. Re:Can we install live web cams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guarding copper with iron fence? Try that in ex-USSR. You will get iron fence stolen, as selling scrap iron is quite profitable. (not to mention webcams and copper).

  9. 7,000 volts? by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    A former police officer friend of mine once sent me a pic of two electrocuted copper thieves, pretty nasty way to go. These two guys were trying to steal LIVE electric lines straight off of the pole, a bad career move on their part. A minor zap to deter bone-headed thieves would save lives. I'm not a licensed electrician, but 7,000 volts sounds kinda' deadly.

    1. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Amps, not the Volts that kill you.

    2. Re:7,000 volts? by multiben · · Score: 0

      7000 volts is shitloads enough to kill you hundreds of times over if it is deployed in the right way. Personally I would be extremely worried to live in a country where this kind of 'deterrent' is allowed to be implemented by everyday businesses. Even if it is designed to be non-lethal a very simple modification will fix that very quickly. How well do American's trust their friendly neighbourhood recycler? The guy in the article sounds a psycho.

    3. Re:7,000 volts? by skids · · Score: 2

      but 7,000 volts sounds kinda' deadly

      Depends on the effective output resistance of the circuit.

    4. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you've even been shocked by static electricity, you've probably been shocked by far more voltage. A quarter inch spark in air is around 20k volts

    5. Re:7,000 volts? by Baloroth · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not a licensed electrician, but 7,000 volts sounds kinda' deadly.

      Not really, as they say "current kills", not voltage. Static electric discharges frequently have a higher voltage than that. Lethality depends on a number of different factors. Of course, 7,000 volts of continuous DC current would most certainly be enough to kill most people, but electric fences usually use short pulses rather than continuous flow (at least, animal fences I've worked with, and been shocked by, do).

      --
      "None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license." --John Milton
    6. Re:7,000 volts? by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

      yes, deployed with lots of amps.

      --
      I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
    7. Re:7,000 volts? by jittles · · Score: 2

      No, no it's not. As the AC above you says, it is amperage that kills and not voltage. See Ohio state Physics for more info.

    8. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it odd how technically inept /. readers are, but shouldn't be suprised by the comments on climate change over the last couple of days where name calling when someone brings up fact others don't like takes the day and upvotes.

      A Van de Graff machiene can go up to 5 million volts and they let kids touch them while running in science museums. Tasers are 50,000 volts as well. Voltage has nothing to do with leathality, its all in amperage.

      Van de Graff

    9. Re:7,000 volts? by multiben · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it is. It may be the current which kills you, but it is the voltage which drives the current (maybe you should read your helpful link a bit more). Depending on its deployment, 7,000 volts could give you a gentle tickle or completely vaporize you. My point was that these systems may be designed to be non-lethal but they can be rigged easily and should not be used as human deterrents.

    10. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the Amps, not the Volts that kill you.

      do the math: V= iR

    11. Re:7,000 volts? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Electric fences for cattle are usually between 5,000 and 10,000V

    12. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Between 1 and 2 qualifies as "lots" now? Because I'm pretty sure that's where the "death zone" is. Below 1A isn't enough to cause much harm. Above 2A will burn you badly, but mostly across the surface of your skin. Between 1A and 2A will penetrate into your tissue and can cause death if it crosses major organs or nerves.

    13. Re:7,000 volts? by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      If you've even been shocked by static electricity, you've probably been shocked by far more voltage. A quarter inch spark in air is around 20k volts

      Static electricity is fun, I've had some pretty big shocks from the static build-up, like e.g. once I was planning to go to bed, I switched the lights off and I don't remember what it was that I touched but the whole room lit up when the spark went off. My hand was totally numb for a while! There was also this one guy who built up over 40,000 volts of static electricity and was near the point of spontaneous self-combustion.

      Not that any of this has anything to do with the story, I just felt like sharing!

    14. Re:7,000 volts? by jittles · · Score: 1

      I = V/R so with that argument you could just as accurately say that a low resistance can kill you. I would also assume that they cannot be easily rigged because the system should monitor the pulses and should tell when something foreign comes in contact with the fence. Once the system detects a change, it should result in an alarm. If the owner of the property intentionally rigs it to be fatal, then how is that any different than murder? He could wire up a shotgun to blast the thief when he tries to open the AC unit, too. Both situations are equally fatal and equally illegal.

    15. Re:7,000 volts? by multiben · · Score: 1

      A low resistance *can* kill you which is why if you are wet or sweaty your body's resistance goes down (potentially to 1% of its dry state) and the same voltage which previously wouldn't have hurt you could now give you a shock. The higher the voltage the easier it is for it to overcome resistance resulting in a higher current which is the bit which can hurt you. The resistance of skin varies widely from person to person and devices like this are extremely dangerous because you don't know who is going to come into contact with it and you don't know under what conditions they will contact it. If a big guy with leathery skin grabs it with both hands he'll probably be ok, but if someone fell or leant against it it could easily send current through the heart making it much more lethal.

    16. Re:7,000 volts? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      i=V/R

      SO tell me again how voltage doesn't matter...

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    17. Re:7,000 volts? by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

      > I'm not a licensed electrician...

      This is clear.

      > ...but 7,000 volts sounds kinda' deadly.

      Electric fence chargers such as the one I use to keep my horses in put out short high-voltage pulses with an energy per pulse of about 6 Joules. The peak voltage is 5,000 to 10,000 volts. The shock is quite painful but not deadly. It leaves no mark and does no damage. I know this from direct experience.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    18. Re:7,000 volts? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      it is amperage that kills and not voltage.

      No, it's not that simple.

      My car battery can supply hundreds of amps, yet grabbing both terminals doesn't kill me, because it's only 12-14 volts.

      A tiny amount of current at a low voltage can kill you, but ONLY if directly delivered across your heart or brain.

      Generally, your skin protects you, by being pretty highly resistive (depending on humidity). But accidents happen, and if you have open wounds, get poked through the skin with a stray copper strand, or similar, a seemingly small amount of current at modest voltages can suddenly become deadly.

      But if we're talking about the most common case, where a terminal is in contact with your skin, a high voltage is needed to overcome the resistance of your skin and musculature, and you also need a not-insignificant amount of current to travel all the way through your body. And even then, the path it takes from entry to exit is critical... With only one arm affected, the power is likely to flow to ground through your legs, and never cross your heart. But if your other hand is grounded, your odds of survival become far worse.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    19. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They say "It's the volts that jolts, but the mills that kills." (milliamps.)
      But voltage is still very important, because you don't get unsafe currents without unsafe voltage. Voltage and current are inseparable.

      I wonder if there is a concise way to express the time and energy requirements that tells the whole story better than the cute jolts/mills maxim, but "sufficient current, charge or power above unsafe voltages can kill you" doesn't have the same ring to it.

    20. Re:7,000 volts? by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Electric fences are designed in a very specific way, essentially they charge up a storage mechanism (coil?), then deliver a pulse of several joules (5% of the energy of a baseball pitch) to the fence. This happens every second or so.

      If the fence is well insulated, current only flows due to the capacitance of the fence and a high potential is developed - if you have a high impedance meter you can measure this as several thousand volts.

      As soon as you have something else enter the circuit - eg a person - current flows preferentially through them and the voltage is drastically reduced. The small amount of energy is dissipated very fast and you're left with a very suprised person and no lasting harm.

      Propper fatal electrocution generally requires a much higher energy delivery (burns, nerve damage etc) or a more sustained shock that interferes with your heart.

    21. Re:7,000 volts? by petermgreen · · Score: 2

      Actually to electrocute someone under normal conditions* you need both a sufficiently high open circuit voltage and a sufficiently high available current. If either of those is too low then you won't get sufficient current through the body to do significant damage.

      That is why you can touch both terminals of your car battery at once, the short circuit current is huge (hundreds of amps) but the voltage is not sufficient to drive that current through the body under normal conditions.

      In general things like electric fences are designed with a high open circuit voltage but a low short circuit current. This means that the current delivered to the body remains relatively constant (and hence can be designed to be high enough to be painful and yet low enough to be reasonablly safe) regardless of the skin resistance involved (which varies quite considerablly).

      * That is external contact with the skin, if the skin is penatrated it takes far less voltage to push a deadly current.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volts hurt. Hertz burn. Amps kill.

    23. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are off by an order of magnitude. The "death zone" you speak of is between 100 and 200 mA, although some sources extend that down to 60 mA for AC.

    24. Re:7,000 volts? by damium · · Score: 1

      That ratio is always true but misleading when used like that because none of those values are fixed in a circuit. If I have a 1.5v AA battery connected to a 0.1 Ohm circuit (say a short length of wire) it should try and provide 15A of power. However, a single AA battery can't provide 15A of power, so the internal resistance of the battery goes up and the voltage output from the battery drops until it is within the range that the battery can provide. That's why electrical load rating is either measured in volt-amps, Watts or x amps at y volts.

    25. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is pretty easy to make the system so you can't rig it to be lethal (short of just hooking 220+ V mains or such up to the wire, in which case you didn't need a system in the first place). If the power supply has a high impedance, the voltage will crap out as soon as something of low resistance is hooked up to the output (the R in I=V/R would include both the human resistance and the resistance inherent in the power supply design... and isn't necessarily just some resistor that can be bypassed). Even if it was using a capacitor with a low impedance output, then the total stored energy can be pretty small, in which case the peak current doesn't matter so much (the standard rules of thumb about dangerous currents doesn't work so well with short pulses of electricity).

      In either case, the voltage alone is not enough to be dangerous and a power supply for such a setup isn't inherently easy to bypass short of using a whole different power supply.

    26. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, do the math. But remember R is not just the resistance of the human body, but includes the internal resistance of the power supply. It is quite easy to build a power supply that craps out when the load resistance is too low, so the actual voltage drop experienced once a connection is made drops to something however small you want. So no, just the voltage alone is not enough to work out what the current through a human would be. This is why there is a big difference between touching say 400+V mains service and some dinky bench power supply that craps out at a few mA.

    27. Re:7,000 volts? by Alioth · · Score: 1

      But some volts are needed too. If you measure your skin resistance when dry with a multimeter, you'll note it's probably on the order of half a megaohm or greater. But the multimeter uses a 1.5v battery to make the measurement. If you had a hypothetical multimeter that used 240 volts to measure resistance, what you'd probably find (aside from receiving a fatal shock, if across the heart) that the skin's resistance "breaks down" and the measured resistance may be a few tens or hundreds of ohms, allowing a large current to flow.

      Wet skin is a different matter of course. I used to test 9v batteries by licking the terminals, a fresh one was nearly painful, a well used or flat one would barely tickle.

    28. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, 7,000 volts of continuous DC current

      I'm an EE, and this makes absolutely no sense. You can't have 700 Volts or curent, as current is measured in Amperes.

    29. Re:7,000 volts? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Above 500mA is enough to stop your heart, 1 or 2 amps is plenty enough.

      7kV isn't a lot. A police taser is 50-100kV. Your average static zap is in the 5-digit range. Your wall plug is 110v or 220v. Think that's safer than a police taser?

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    30. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So... it sounds like you are agreeing with the idea that it is the current and not the voltage. The car battery can't drive the current needed through your chest (however much current it can drive through a different circuit is irrelevant). I have 300 V batteries that are not anywhere near lethal due to having too high of an internal resistance, so more voltage doesn't help. Likewise, because of the high resistance of dry skin, it prevents enough current from flowing through your chest too, unless something bypasses it (being wet, sores, or high enough voltage)..

      The only place the "current kills" breaks down (assuming it is short for "current through chest"...) is for fast pulses where the total energy delivered matters more.

    31. Re:7,000 volts? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      No. Neither high voltage nor high current on its own will kill a person. You need both, and excesses of either one will allow the other to be reduced to minimal levels to still be lethal.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    32. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it is pretty clear from medical research that it comes down to the amount of current. The mount of voltage needed to drive that current depends on the particular situation, but the amount of current needed for various effects for a given timescale is much more consistent. There are situations where you can drive pretty high currents through parts of the human body with not much voltage, so high voltage is not needed.

    33. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For direct contact, the open circuit voltage and short circuit currents don't really matter, the only thing that matters is the current given a resistance in the range of a human body if it is a long duration process, or the total energy delivered if it is a short pulse.

    34. Re:7,000 volts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internal resistance doesn't necessarily go up (although it does in a lot of cases). Even a fixed internal resistance though means that voltage across the terminals will drop when the load has a comparable or smaller resistance. Especially noticeable in higher voltage batteries that have much higher internal resistances, and crap out at lower currents and have less heating effects, giving a much more constant internal resistance but still substantial voltage loss.

    35. Re:7,000 volts? by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Pure nonsense.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  10. Manslaughter maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If someone gets injured or dies from this system, couldn't the owner be charged with battery, manslaughter or worse? Even if the government sanctioned the device, it might be criminal. And of course there's always the non-criminal, civil suit liability to worry about.

    1. Re:Manslaughter maybe? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Battery? What if its powered from the mains?

    2. Re:Manslaughter maybe? by jrmcferren · · Score: 1

      They get charged with mains then.

      --
      sudo mod me up
  11. South African solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    In South Africa (I think), they had an even more novel solution.

    They simple altered the reclose time on their power lines so the copper thieves could trip them.... assume the line's been de-energised.... and hook it up to the truck to drag it down.

    When it finally reclosed it took out the whole lot with kilovolts of canned Thor and taught them a valuable lesson.

    Probably be litigated into the ground in the US, however.

  12. that's not a high-voltage fence. THIS is.... by swschrad · · Score: 1

    here in nothing-happens land, we had a case a couple years ago where a copper thief decided he was going to clean out a power substation.

    as in 110,000 volts on that line.

    there was enough to drag into court recently to send to jail for it. but as long as ignorant meth-heads can bring in saw-cut cable and get cash, they'll continue to strip fire stations and chain up fiber-optic ducts and try to roll full spools into the trunks of compact cars.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  13. Lawsuit? by Krojack · · Score: 1

    'It'll be a little fun to watch one of these guys get electrocuted holding my fence trying to rob me.'"

    Until the the thief turns around and tries to sue you and most likely wins.

    1. Re:Lawsuit? by Fuzzums · · Score: 3, Funny

      'It'll be a little fun to watch one of these guys get electrocuted holding my fence trying to rob me.'"

      Until the the thief turns around and tries to sue you and most likely wins.

      Because he didn't know how to read the signs "copper thieves will be electrocuted; survivors will be electrocuted again"?

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    2. Re:Lawsuit? by Krojack · · Score: 1

      If you haven't seen, people sue over the stupidest things in the US. He will claim that the warning signs weren't lit up at night or something.

    3. Re:Lawsuit? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Not likely, but you keep hanging onto the everyone sues and wins myth.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Lawsuit? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Not likely, but you keep hanging onto the everyone sues and wins myth.
      Well, it is true that more and more the U.S. is turning into a country where we will do whatever we can to protect criminals from those pesky citizens. Prosecutors would rather prosecute someone who fought back against a criminal than prosecute the criminal him/herself. I mean criminals are dangerous. The worst an upstanding citizen will do to you is express outrage at the sheer absurdity of the situation.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    5. Re:Lawsuit? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      Everyone who sues might not win, but everyone who gets sued loses. Good luck getting the cost of your defense back from a copper thief.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    6. Re:Lawsuit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Signs or not, you can't generally build things with the explicit intent of harming people, even if those people have criminal intent. Partly, that's because whether your would-be thief was actually committing a crime is a matter for the criminal courts, and he'll be suing you in the civil ones. Also, if your booby trap worked, then presumably he didn't go on to commit a crime, and so you have intentionally assaulted someone who is, by definition, innocent.

      You might make a case for using an electric fence to deter criminals from a greater danger within (such as real high voltage, high current lines), but if it's just to stop them pinching some cable then you'll probably lose in court. And no, you waiting inside the fence with a shotgun does not count as a greater danger.

  14. Not a killer fence, sorry. by jhutchins · · Score: 1

    Typical domestic animal control fences carry a non-lethal charge of from 2,000 volts to 10,000 volts. It's not the voltage that kills you, it's the current.
    http://www.uwex.edu/ces/crops/uwforage/energizer.pdf

  15. What if they steal the fence? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope the fences aren't made out of copper wire...

  16. Hot Gloves anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hot Gloves will work just fine.

    Its like people that gripe about immigrant workers...... come down on the people hiring them, or in this case buying "hot" copper.

  17. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The costs to business that illeagaly buy/fence copper? Maybe it might be an extra cost to legitimate copper recyclers but the actual ones forcing government to act is those copper recyclers that buy such stolen copper. Keeping records is no more than what is expected from pawn shops. As an additional part of the sugested record keeping, I would also demand a fingerprint of any seller. That way we could also get evidence of the thief as well as his fence.

  18. Just plug in the copper by TheSkepticalOptimist · · Score: 1

    Problem solved.

    --
    I haven't thought of anything clever to put here, but then again most of you haven't either.
  19. Free recharge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any engineering whiz out there that can figure out a way to use the electricity on the fence to recharge your car (though the drain may be noticed), or perhaps through induction, recharge your phone or tablet?

    1. Re:Free recharge? by gagol · · Score: 1

      induction alone is barely enough to recharge a cell phone from a high volage main transport line... and the drop of power would probably trip the alarm. You do not deserve your geek card.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
  20. why stop at just copper? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so special about copper? Why can't I put an electric fence around my box of donuts that everyone keeps putting their grubby hands into and stealing a donut?

    OK, so the example is silly but the point is still there. If somebody can put an electric fence around copper why can't everyone who has something they want to prevent theft of using electric fences?

  21. Tried it here, doesn't work. Simple reason. by raymorris · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Where I live that is one of many regulations related metal recycling. It hasn't worked. There is no way to identify a particular piece of pipe, wiring etc. and say it came from some specific location. Even where you COULD match it up, that would require forensic inspection of every piece of metal trash, then comparing each to all thefts. We're talking about vast amounts of scrap, trash, every day, not the occasional mysterious body evey few years, so the forensics to match them aren't anywhere near feasible.

  22. Pulsed by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    As with cattle fences this would be a pulsed current, probably one or two pulses per second. They charge a capacitor to the peak voltage then dump it into a step-up transformer, reminiscent of old capacitor-discharge ignition systems for cars.

    This enables the number of Joules and the shape and duration of the pulse to be controlled, reducing the chance of fatalities, and so avoiding legal problems.

    As to gloves, 5KV to 7KV would be enough to break down many cheaper types of insulating gloves, so thieves may still be in for a surprise.

  23. I have one by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Funny

    A neighbor girl had fun teaching my dogs to jump my fence. She was climbing back and forth into my yard all the time and goading the dogs to follow her. They of course learned. So I went to the local farm implement store and was looking at invisible fences... they were expensive... then I saw the regular farm electric fence transformer was only $15! SOLD! A roll of aluminum wire was $5 for 1/4 mile and the insulators was another $2. So for $22 and about 2hrs work I had an electric fence.

    Well my neighbors were "outraged" The little girl that had been jumping the fence was now in "mortal danger" according to her mom. I told her "well maybe you should keep her off my fence then" The fact of the matter is, I got zapped by far worse fences than what I put up when I was a kid... and while it smarts, it doesn't do any real damage to you. Apparently there's a city ordinance against electric fences in town, they pointed this out to me... I pointed out that I really didn't care and I was already breaking at least a dozen others. They called the cops... cops never came. Apparently had more important things to do.

    Then, about 8 months later, the best thing ever happened (well for me anyway.) The neighbors got their house broken into. I guess it wasn't great for them. But the cops showed up, investigated, and told them there were tracks in the mud leading up to MY fence... then for some odd reason the moved over to their house, jumped the fence and kicked in the back door. The husband told me about this... wanted his own electric fence now. He said "When you stop laughing can you go with me to the store?"

    Long story short... electric fences rock. 2 of my neighbors have them to.

    1. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The real surprising part of this story is at the end:

      But the cops showed up, investigated, and told them there were tracks in the mud leading up to MY fence...

      Last I looked, cops weren't in the job to investigate anything...

    2. Re:I have one by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Cool story, bro.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:I have one by WhatAreYouDoingHere · · Score: 2

      ... then I saw the regular farm electric fence transformer was only $15! SOLD! A roll of aluminum wire was $5 for 1/4 mile and the insulators was another $2. So for $22 and about 2hrs work I had an electric fence.

      Wow, how old are you? :)

      --
      "What are you doing here, Elijah?"
    4. Re:I have one by epSos-de · · Score: 1

      You should also warn cool people from the block that you have the damn electricity on the fence, otherwise kids will get hurt. Put some nice signs and teach kids that electricity can bite very hard. Robbers will probably have no time for reading signs.

    5. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They aren't. When my house got broken into the only way the criminals were found is because they left their cell phone at my house. It still took the cops a week to track down the criminals. One of them was the long distance of across the street and the other was about 2 blocks away.

    6. Re:I have one by IonOtter · · Score: 2

      Stupidity is supposed to be painful.

      Climbing your neighbor's fence, no matter how young or old you are, is stupid.

      The kids will learn that climbing someone else's fence is stupid and they won't do that anymore.

      --
      [End Of Line]
    7. Re:I have one by dbc · · Score: 2

      pfft. There *is* a sign. It's called an "insulator". Clue for the city kids: Nobody bothers to insulate a fence wire that isn't electrified. As to everyone worried about how bad the kids will get hurt -- it's a standard farm kid prank to wire up a fence charger to something unexpected, like say, your friend's bicycle, and then stand close enough to see the reaction, but far enough away that you have a good head start (assuming you can run while laughing your @ss off). Sure, I've been bit a few times. Good way to polish your cursing vocabulary.

    8. Re:I have one by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      If you live an a good area, the cops are actually on your side.

      But if you live in a shitty city, on one of the coasts, you're probably right.

    9. Re:I have one by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      When my mom's car was stolen, they found it in a carpark well know for being a staging area for a ring of car thieves that took the cars down to Mexico. They took fingerprints (yes, amazing in itself), and found that the fingerprints matched those of a known car thief. However, they did not pursue the car thief or issue a warrant for his arrest, and they also wouldn't give my mother the information on who the car thief was.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    10. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... then I saw the regular farm electric fence transformer was only $15! SOLD! A roll of aluminum wire was $5 for 1/4 mile and the insulators was another $2. So for $22 and about 2hrs work I had an electric fence.

      Wow, how old are you? :)

      Must be ancient, he's posting from a typewriter!

    11. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well, an electric fence transformer goes for as little as $20 on the first website I checked, so......

    12. Re:I have one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should also warn cool people from the block that you have the damn electricity on the fence, otherwise kids will get hurt. Put some nice signs and teach kids that electricity can bite very hard.

      Robbers will probably have no time for reading signs.

      If they are hooked up, wouldn't they be hot?

    13. Re:I have one by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      I do live in a nice area, but the cops rarely investigate things like robbery as long as nobody gets hurt.

      They aren't impolite or anything, they just say they'll keep their eye out or something and that is the end of it.

      If it were up to me I'd have them do a much better job investigating minor crimes. Go ahead and spend $10k when somebody steals $100 and nail them. If you stop the minor crimes you probably will have a big impact on the major crimes, and if somebody thinks they can get away with stealing $100 pretty soon every house on the block will be missing $100.

      Oh, I'm all for rehabilitation and all that as well - not just locking people up. However, the solution to excessive prison populations isn't to stop enforcing the law either. There do need to be social changes, but real crimes with victims need to be prosecuted.

    14. Re:I have one by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      This is the one I got... was cheaper where I got it:
      http://www.landmsupply.com/department/farm/fencing-supplies/fencers/fi-shock-ac-powered-light-duty-electric-fence-energizer-10-acre-range?utm_source=google&utm_medium=shopping&utm_campaign=google_base

  24. Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by raymorris · · Score: 1

    For every grocery item you buy, fill out a form with it's UPC code, expiration date, etc. Make a copy of your ID for each. Then do a forensic examination on each piece of trash so that you can distinguish between one milk carton and another. Do that for a week, then tell us if it's acceptable to you to spend your days doing that.

    1. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Improv · · Score: 2

      I am not a business. Businesses need accountants and legal help as part of their ordinary existence, and they're artificial entities to begin with.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    2. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by nschubach · · Score: 2

      But you could be an electrician who stocks clippings and removed lines for recycling later. Are you stating that the Electrician should have to register every house they remove wire from... even if it is just a handful?

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    3. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 1

      They do that with the ingredients for making meth.

      Nobody is stealing milk.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    4. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no, they don't. They need them to keep the parasites happy. Businesses need capital, profit and cashflow. Accountants and lawyers do not help the business; they mitigate the assault on profit.

    5. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Improv · · Score: 2

      Profit is not something people are entitled to; they can seek it, but there are various other societal interests in most things they might do, and those things have to be figured in. Usually through regulation.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    6. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by darkwing_bmf · · Score: 2

      Why wouldn't an electrician have documentation about where they worked? They should include a clause in their contract for removal of excess pieces and parts or leave them with the customer.

    7. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by rthille · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend opened up a small retail store. Not that many items, it's an interior design shop and there are maybe 400 unique items in inventory. She sells maybe a max of 5 items/day. There's an amazing fuck-all amount of paperwork associated with the accounting, ordering, tracking, shipping, all that shit. And that's with zero government regulatory stuff (Quickbooks tracks the sales tax with basically zero additional overhead).

      So, while I'm generally in favor of government regulation when necessary, don't think it has zero impact on the economy or businesses.

      --
      Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
    8. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 1

      I am not a business. Businesses need accountants and legal help as part of their ordinary existence, and they're artificial entities to begin with.

      Businesses are people! Who the fuck do you think runs them? Automatons? Are there AI constructs that write pay checks to the workers? What makes you think that an electrician, who is usually the sole proprietor of his business, can afford to hire accountants and lawyers "as part of their ordinary existence" as you put it? Even corporations are people. People make or lose money when the group is profitable or not. There is never a non-person involved in the process. Share holders are people too. A lot of people's retirements are bound to a particular corporations stock, and when they lose money people lose money not some "artificial entity" as you so eloquently put it but real live people. And while larger businesses usually do hire accountants and lawyers, it is only to combat piss ant people like you who think that money and resources grow on trees.

      When the company has to pay additional workers that perform no useful function other than to fill out fucking useless forms, it means their products and services cost more and their employees get paid less and everyone but the lawyer and/or accountant loses. Even the government loses because the business making less money will mean less tax revenue. So great fucking plan, let's make people do a bunch of useless shit because you've deemed them "artificial entities". How about this? I deem you an "artificial entity"!

    9. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by TFAFalcon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If businesses are people, then why aren't they put in jail when they break laws? Why aren't they required to pay income taxes, social security, serve in the army if there is a draft,.......

      Businesses may EMPLOY people, and they can be OWNED by people. But they are certainly not people themselves.

    10. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by sumdumass · · Score: 2

      Most of those laws only carry fines and other regulatory sentencing. However, it is easier to find a corporation guilty of a criminal act then it is a find a specific person within the corporation guilty of the act. This is because most laws actually require a men rea or state of mind in order to enter into the sentencing parts that include jail time.

      Corporations are jailed all the time. They do not put a piece of paper in jail, the piece of paper doesn't act on it's own. It's the people within the construct of the piece of paper that actually acts and it is those who sit in jail. Sometimes the offense is to egregious that the corporations are disbanded as well as people being locked up.

    11. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Coolhand2120 · · Score: 2

      You obviously have no clue what you're talking about. Owners, employees and executive officers are jailed all the time for criminal offences that are made by the business that they signed off on or perpetrated on behalf of the business. What did you think, you could kill someone and say "oh, I was working for a business" and get off? Don't be stupid. The people who own or are employed by the business are compelled to pay into social security and the business has to match their contribution, jackass, so it actually pays a shit load more than any one employed there, maybe remember that next time you read your paycheck stub, if you're even employed. The business has to pay a shit ton more tax than the individuals employed by the business and 100% of the people in the business can be drafted into service. And I'm sure if the government could work some way to get the building or filing cabinet owned by the business to be drafted into service they'd do that too. Bottom line, a business doesn't exist without the people who make up the business. It would be like if I said "the salvation army isn't people". So I think I hit all your ignorant points. Get a clue before you comment.

    12. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by nschubach · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure why it matters. Personally, I don't think it's the responsibility of the law abiding electrician to have to provide proof that they didn't commit a crime to get scrap copper. Innocent until proven guilty, etc.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    13. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      That is preposterous.

      However, there IS a record for each item I purchase. It's called a "sales receipt", offered to me with each and every purchase. It itemizes everything, including any applicable sales taxes. It itemizes what I bought by brand name, size, cost, and whether I used any discount scheme to pay for it.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    14. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      "Businesses are people! "

      Two word: Horse. Shit.

      Which businesses were drafted to serve in the trenches in World War 1? Which served honorably in World War 2? How many businesses lost their lives in Korea and Viet Nam?

      How many businesses have been sent to prison for breaking the law?

      Citizens United was nothing more than an assault on real people's rights, and on our "democratic" election system.

      And, obviously, you swallowed all the propaganda surrounding the Citizen's United decisions.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    15. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If businesses are people, then why aren't they put in jail when they break laws? Why aren't they required to pay income taxes, social security, serve in the army if there is a draft,.......

      Businesses may EMPLOY people, and they can be OWNED by people. But they are certainly not people themselves.

      All the people in the business (shareholders, employees, etc.) are put in jail if they break laws, they pay income taxes, etc. Are you retarded or something?

    16. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

      Which businesses were drafted to serve in the trenches in World War 1? Which served honorably in World War 2?

      you mean like the factories pressed into manufacturing military vehicles weapons and uniforms. Of course they weren't in the trenches but they were in military service.
        if you want one famous example is AC Gilbert and Company a manufacturer of children's toys including the famous Erectors Set and American Flyer who during WW2 manufactured equipment for military aircraft. another example would be ibm manufacturing browning automatic and m1 carbine for the war effort.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    17. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Accountants and lawyers do not help the business; they mitigate the assault on profit.

      Contradict yourself much? Making sure your bookkeeping and contracts don't have mistakes in them doesn't help the business? I guess the engineers that check designs and quality control agents also don't help business, only mitigating threats to profit instead.

    18. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that doesn't equate to the draft. The similarities end where the bullets and shrapnel start flying.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    19. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      You mean bullets and shrapnel that can kill people just like losing your traditional customer base because you're forced to re-purpose the resources you use to create the products they buy from you can kill your business?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    20. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that women were not considered people, either?

    21. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Losing a customer base does not equate to death - it's as simple as that. Death. There is no recovery from that. Businesses? People walk away from businesses daily, and recover from the experience, whether they went bankrupt, were victim of a hostile takeover, willingly sold out, were fired, just quit, regulatory shutdown, or whatever. No deaths involved.

      Why in the FUCK do people attempt to equate any business situation to DEATH.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    22. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by TFAFalcon · · Score: 1

      Sure the business has to pay some of it's employees social security contributions, but so does any employer. It does not have to pay contributions for what it earns itself. Could you employ someone, then claim you don't have to pay your own SS since you're already paying for his/hers? And if your employees were drafted, would that exempt you? And it would be easy to draft a business - just claim everything it produces for the state.

      And what if a business does exist without people? What it all a business is is a couple of contracts and a simple computer program. It might have needed employees once, but it can exist perfectly well without them.

    23. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...businesses are people ... and they can be OWNED by people

      Owning businesses should be outlawed as it breaks the 13th amendment.

    24. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you could be an electrician who stocks clippings and removed lines for recycling later. Are you stating that the Electrician should have to register every house they remove wire from... even if it is just a handful?

      Nobody is worried about these professionals stealing copper, nor should the law or its enforcers.

      Obvious solution: add an exemption for licensed electricians, contractors, etc..

    25. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to get a life if this is how you go about doing the things you actually want to.

    26. Re:Try it for a week and see if it's acceptable by BronsCon · · Score: 1

      When you are no more, you have died. When IBM is no more, IBM has died. We're nottalking about the people who work forthe company, we're talking about the business itself; once IBM is gone, IBM is gone, it's not coming back. That's death.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
  25. Shocking. by Formalin · · Score: 0

    I really hate when people say 'electrocute' when they mean 'shock'. Big difference.
    You don't walk off being electrocuted, it's the end of the line.

    Unless he's actually planning on having a lethal fence, which is fucked, not to mention a massive liability.

    1. Re:Shocking. by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      I really hate it when people make lame attempts at pedantry.

      I'll been electrocuted several times and I'm here to tell you about it.

      https://www.google.com/search?q=electrocute+definition

      After you convince multiple respectable sources such the Oxford Dictionary, I promise I'll follow suit.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    2. Re:Shocking. by Formalin · · Score: 1

      Not sure what you're on about. Maybe you should look it up in oxford first.

      Definition of electrocute
      verb
              injure or kill someone by electric shock: a man was electrocuted when he switched on the Christmas tree lights
              execute (a convicted criminal) by means of the electric chair.

      Origin:

      late 19th century: from electro-, on the pattern of execute

    3. Re:Shocking. by Formalin · · Score: 1

      aww fuck.

      injure.

      what idiot added that part.

    4. Re:Shocking. by Galactic+Dominator · · Score: 1

      what idiot added that part

      I'm guessing that "idiot" is someone who understands we couldn't be where we are today unless we allow language to evolve over time. Probably also someone who doesn't jump head first into any bit of anal mythology which crosses their path. Someone who only hits submit after having a bit of knowledge rather than faith on the topic.

      --
      brandelf -t FreeBSD /brain
    5. Re:Shocking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The merriam-webster dictionary entry is the next one under Google's.

      Definition of ELECTROCUTE
      1
      : to execute (a criminal) by electricity
      2
      : to kill by electric shock

      Considering the source, I'd say you have yet to be electrocuted, but don't let that stop you.

    6. Re:Shocking. by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      So were you actually injured, or did it just hurt a little?

      You should see some of the really horrific injuries that electrical burns cause.

    7. Re:Shocking. by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Electrocute is a portmanteu of "electro" and "execute", execute in this context meaning kill.

      You've been shocked several times, not electrocuted.

  26. Electric fence detector by godel_56 · · Score: 4, Informative

    BTW, if you ever need to determine if your electric fence is switched on or not, without putting your tongue across it, a portable AM radio tuned between stations and held close to the wires will enable the HV pulses to be heard.

    1. Re:Electric fence detector by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think my Walkman in the 80s could pick up AM radio. Don't remember for sure though, since I only used FM and cassette.

    2. Re:Electric fence detector by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      BTW, if you ever need to determine if your electric fence is switched on or not, without putting your tongue across it, a portable AM radio tuned between stations and held close to the wires will enable the HV pulses to be heard.
      Maybe they have improved in recent years, but I remember that they used to tick audibly.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    3. Re:Electric fence detector by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Generally speaking, the size of the antenna needed for effective AM reception was large enough to keep them out of smaller music players like the Walkman.

  27. Re:that's not a high-voltage fence. THIS is.... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Probably falls under reckless endangerment but if they could only leave a pile of copper coils out in the open, behind the fence of course, and connect it to a high power line...

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  28. Free Drugs by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about instead of spending billions on replacing stolen goods and electric fences and insurance we instead spend millions giving away free crack, heroin and other addictive drugs? You get a card and you can go to a drug store and get free heroin. We'd save a LOT of dollars.

    1. Re:Free Drugs by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      How about instead of spending billions on replacing stolen goods and electric fences and insurance we instead spend millions giving away free crack, heroin and other addictive drugs? You get a card and you can go to a drug store and get free heroin. We'd save a LOT of dollars.

      In America? There's an economic system (police, prisons, judicial, lawyers, etc...) so entrenched based on drugs being illegal, that legalizing all drugs could destroy our economy. Destroying innocent human lives is far more profitable!

    2. Re:Free Drugs by gagol · · Score: 1

      Better yet, legalize and tax the shit out of it. That being said, thieves and drug addicts are not by definition the same people.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    3. Re:Free Drugs by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      thieves and drug addicts are not by definition the same people

      For sure, but for 99% of the people stealing copper wire, they are. The rate of return is too low for anyone other than a junkie to care.

    4. Re:Free Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing innocent about a crackhead or a junkie hooked on whatever. In fact, the US should hand out free laced baggies and enjoy the cultural and genetic cleansing it would bring. And while we're at it, let's finish the European Baking championships.

    5. Re:Free Drugs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't profitable. The tax payers pay the bill and nothing is created for society. Dismantling the system slowly is cheaper than continuing it irregardless going forward even if you simply let the people just retire out of the business. The whole shaking the system argument is short sighted. Same thing with health insurance companies. You don't have to have immediate change.

  29. Economics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm not an expert, but is the cost of ...

    1) An electrician
    2) The fence wire and pole installation
    3) The inverter, components, and monthly power
    4) The signage I'm sure would be required by law
    5) The periodic maintenance and upkeep of insulator coils
    6) The outer barrier-fence that this almost certainly will need as a matter of safety and/or law (and simple maintenance--don't want windblown debris shorting things)

    Actually cheaper than a guard armed with a pistol? I mean, even in California at a certain point you gain the right to say "Stop, or I'll shoot" and actually follow through...

    I'm assume it'd be high voltage, low amperage fence... a horse or cattle fence doesn't take much, but in order to deter a person you actually need more than painful -- you need a "probably dangerous" quantity.

    I'm not sure what the costs of a military or police style electric fence actually are monthly... But I'm seriously wondering how it compares with human labor...

  30. Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by raymorris · · Score: 4, Informative

    I once touched an electric fence with a three foot stick. I got quite a jolt. It's current, amps, that are dangerous, but it's volts that jump through insulation, and these things have a lot of volts. If you're unsure whether gloves, say thick leather work gloves, will help, consider this - an electric fence is designed to drop a 2,000 bull. A bull covered in non-conductive hair, and under that, covered in leather. Hmm, I'm giving advice for THIEVES. Come to think of it, everything I just said is a lie. All you have to do is use your T shirt to cover the wire, so your hands don't touch it directly. It'll work, I promise.

    1. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but what bull knows how to ground the fence first? Yes, I know. Copper thieves are pretty dumb. They'll probably touch the fence multiple times before figuring out what the problem is.

      As far as that t-shirt, the arc distance in air at 7kV is 1.5 mm. So I'd use something a little bit thicker.

    2. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by gagol · · Score: 1

      Use jumper cable to ground the wire first, or cut with torch... seriously technical solutions to social problems simply do not work that well.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    3. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Volts don't jump anywhere. The potential difference between two points is measured in volts, just like the height difference between two points is measured in meters. Volts don't go through you when you get shocked, and height doesn't go through you when you jump off a roof. Volts DRIVE current through you. Saying one (volts or amps) will kill you and the other won't is like saying "bullets don't kill you, it's the holes in your organs that kill you". It's a package deal. Current goes nowhere without voltage, and voltage without current is just as harmless.

    4. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Nimey · · Score: 1

      That depends. I've stood calf-deep in muddy water and bumped a live cattle-rated (at any rate, it was around a cow pasture) electric fence with my coat-covered shoulder. The experience was unpleasant, but I didn't fall over, lose control of my bladder, or freeze in place until the current was cut. It was more surprising than anything else, and I was able to disengage myself after a couple seconds.

      Then I did it a second time with the same results. Perhaps that fence was low-voltage.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    5. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're unsure whether gloves, say thick leather work gloves, will help, consider this - an electric fence is designed to drop a 2,000 bull.

      That is because a bull is full of water and is grounded pretty good. Consider this, the article states the voltage is 7,000 volts. A pair of class 2 lineman gloves is good for 17,000 to 20,000.

    6. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by NIK282000 · · Score: 2

      As a licensed electrician and high voltage hobbiest I can assure you that a pair of rubber dish washing gloves will stand up to a 7kv electric fence long enough to cut the wires from the power supply. You got a shock because you touched the fence with a wooden stick, wood has a lot of water in it which is conductive and when it doesn't have water it does have a lot of carbon which is also very conductive at high voltages.

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    7. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by stick, you mean a wood stick, possibly with high moisture content if it was from a near by tree and not say a piece of lumber, it would be a pretty poor insulator. Even dry wood can sometimes be poor at high voltages (although much higher than 7 kV), although it can vary a lot depending on the particular piece and humidity and what it was previously exposed to. That said, I've tested 10-20 kV systems on pieces of plywood before just fine without much leakage (although wouldn't use that in an installed setup).

      And you can easily get professional gloves rated for 7 kV under $100. I've used ones rated up to 20+ kV before, which cost a bit more (a lot more if you actually follow proper testing before use, etc.). Something certainly can be improvised, even if it is wearing many layers of cheap gloves (layering a material frequently has high voltage hold off than a solid piece of equal thickness... assuming no tiny holes).

      Although all of that seems irrelevant. The easiest solution is just bolt cutters or some other long handled cutter with insulating handles. Such a thing would be trivial to make with stuff at hardware store or with things found around. And if the fence is anything like that used for cattle, it might hurt like hell, but as long as the thief is determined or desperate, and doesn't have a bad heart condition, they can survive many failures in the process of perfecting their methods. I would expect cutting would be the easy part, only hurting people who didn't pay attention to warning signs, and would expect more thieves get hurt due to not planning or paying attention to the fallen wiring if still hot.

    8. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your wood stick conductivity "explanation" is maybe too simplistic, because rubber washing gloves contain a lot of carbon, too.

      But, your actual experience with high voltages trumps mere speculation on the subject.

    9. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I once touched an electric fence with a three foot stick. I got quite a jolt. It's current, amps, that are dangerous, but it's volts that jump through insulation, and these things have a lot of volts.

      If you're unsure whether gloves, say thick leather work gloves, will help, consider this - an electric fence is designed to drop a 2,000 bull. A bull covered in non-conductive hair, and under that, covered in leather.

      Hmm, I'm giving advice for THIEVES. Come to think of it, everything I just said is a lie. All you have to do is use your T shirt to cover the wire, so your hands don't touch it directly. It'll work, I promise.

      do thieves actually jump across the fences around substations? ( I mean the Substations that have the massive HV lines coming in from pylons? ). About 50kv and higher, anything that doesnt have to do with the lines and stuff along the road ). The corona from these are crazy, and Induction is deadly, should you get to close. I actually was able to stand under a set of pylons with a fluro tube and it lit up ( these were tall ones and had 2 sets of cables per isolator ). Also by touching the hood of my car (was under it to), I was able to get a decent vibration, and felt current thru my hand (tingling), It made me a little dizzy. But if this voltage isn't enough, maybe 20-30kv thru the fence would work ? Like maybe the amps amount from a power line along the road?. I know those lines have MORE than enough power to kill someone. I don';t think any thieves go around those giant substations, The volts and power going through there would evaporate you in a matter of seconds.

    10. Re:Note to copper thieves - gloves won't work by slacker001 · · Score: 1

      consider this - an electric fence is designed to drop a 2,000 bull.

      False. Have you ever actually been around a bull? Almost nothing will drop them. Electric fences are meant to be a deterrent - a 2,000lb bull will walk through one if he wants to.

  31. Re:Tried it here, doesn't work. Simple reason. by LMariachi · · Score: 1

    The electric utility here uses a proprietary type of wire that no one else has access to (AFAIK it’s not “special” beyond being braided in a particular pattern) so recycling companies can identify cable that’s been pulled from streetlights and such.

  32. Re:Progress! by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    How many people die from touching electric fences in farms?

  33. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Better to unleash the laser sharks

  34. Laundry static is 20,000 volts, what's your point by raymorris · · Score: 1

    3V across the heart can kill you. 750 volts behind 2 milliamps is a prank sold in toy stores. (Shock pen.) 100,000 volts behind 0.1ma you wouldn't even notice. Volts aren't dangerous, amps are.

  35. Yeah, right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch as a burgeoning black market for 7000V transformers and fence wiring blossoms.....

    (in parallel to that of copper stuff, of course)

  36. Re:Tried it here, doesn't work. Simple reason. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think you don't actual have a clue and are making that up.

    We are talking about huge rolls of unused wire, industrial valves that cost 30k+, statues. Sometimes 100's of yards of copper.

    So when some cones tolling it with a giant spool of wire in there truck, that person gets photographed. If someone reports large bundles of wire stolen, then police can ask that person questions .

    Forensics. You need to watch less CSI.
    The police report a large copper valve has been stole and provide description. The get a thumb print and picture. Possible an address(which may be a lie).
    Then they do investigation.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  37. That is not a high voltage by pubwvj · · Score: 2

    7,000 volts is not a high voltage fence. Our farm fences are 10,000 volts. It's not the voltage that will kill you though, it is the amperage that does you in. For this reason the fences are high voltage and low amperage. It hurts. However, if you're determined you can grab ahold of the fence and hang on right through the shocks. I've done it many times when needed.

    See this article:

    http://sugarmtnfarm.com/2007/07/23/calibrating-pain-fence-testing/

  38. Wouldn't Rubber... by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

    gloves, shoes, and maybe rain gear make the fence pointless? Oh, well I suppose the contractor installing the fence benefits so I guess it's OK.

    --
    Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    1. Re:Wouldn't Rubber... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nope, go ahead wear gloves and rubberized tools to touch the fence. You'll still feel the pulse just as much as before. Well OK maybe a little less, but still hurts just about as much.

      I'm sure there is some amount of insulation that will actually help, but your moms dish gloves isn't going to do it.

    2. Re:Wouldn't Rubber... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A grounding stake shorting the fence out would be more effective, and probably take out the fence controller as well.

  39. They do keep ID here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't they do that everywhere?

    Well for everything but Al cans, those are excluded, guess if someone wants to steal empty cans they aren't stopped from doing so.

    That said, there is still plenty of theft of metals. So I guess it doesn't do much good.

  40. How about a huge, high current coil in the fence by dazby · · Score: 1

    To deter copper thieves, why not go straight for the payload. Put a massive, high current coil along the fence line, and induce a current in the stolen copper, either making it too hot to handle, or melting it in place. Safe for the neighborhood kids (provided they keep their bikes away).

  41. Re:Laundry static is 20,000 volts, what's your poi by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

    Can we stop all this amps and voltage nonsense? They are proportional to each other. Higher voltage gives higher current. The only way high voltage is safe is if the power source can't support the large current draw. Then you don't get the current because the battery dies. If you don't believe me, feel free to go grab some 110 kV power lines.

  42. Is this Legal? by craigminah · · Score: 1

    I remember numerous stories from the 90's where businesses would booby trap their business to stop thieves and I thought in every case this was illegal. One business owner I remember released a few poisonous snakes in his business and posted signs outside saying to stay out because poisonous snakes were on patrol. Eventually the thieves returned to the scene of their previous crime, broke-in, and got bit. Following American customs, they sued the business owner and won.

    Not sure what the defense argument was but I'd think electrified copper would result in the same thing and the criminals would sue.

  43. Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by istartedi · · Score: 2

    The blame for this problem rests almost totally at the feet of Ben Bernanke. His policies have driven commodity speculation and helped keep prices high. It's one of those "unintended consequences".

    If you want to stop copper theft, stop savings theft. The policy makers need to ask questions like, "Is it better in the long run to feed these people in a recession, or drive them to copper theft in a stagflation?".

    Treating drug addiction as a health problem rather than a crime problem will also help. If meth were available for $0.10/pill at the drugstore, I would not run out and become an meth fiend anymore than I would start huffing gasoline. Yes, people huff gasoline, they huff the propellant from Cheeze Whiz. We don't ban those things because the inability to drive or squirt cheese is deemed worse than the potential for people to huff shit. We treat huffing in the ER, and with social workers. We could treat meth like that too, and there would be less copper theft.

    Yeah, the housing market would collapse. You know what? Good! Stop foreclosures? Hell no. If you want to liberate people, you should be holding up signs that say START foreclosure. Yeah, people would hurt for a month or two getting kicked out of the big house with no equity and a $2000/mo mortgage. You know what? They'd move into an apartment with an $800/mo rent, and they might be able to save up for down payment on a house with a $1000/mo mortgage once the foreclosure was far enough behind them. That sounds more like freedom to me than... Oh, I digress...

    Anyway, the problem of copper theft isn't technical. It's social and economic. Quit applying technical fixes to social problems. Please. Pretty-please?

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah yeah, another pothead who wants legal drugs. Meth at the drug store? Fuck you.

      I'm tired of rich, white well-to-do hipster liberals like yourself who think legal drugs are a magical cure for all our problems. It's a solution that works for YOUR way of life, not for everybody else's.

      I'm poor and have been homeless for eight years of my life. I've seen drug abuse first hand and it is fucking terrible. Just look at how poor people handle alcohol, cigarettes, and prescription medicine. We abuse the hell out of it. Why do you think every run down neighborhood is teeming with liquor stores, run by people who live out of town? There's a huge demand because we drink to forget, we get high to numb ourselves. We have miserable lives and we need to escape as often as we can. Legalizing drugs is like giving an heroin addict $1000 and assuming he won't misuse it. He'd OD in an hour.

      Flooding us with legal drugs is just what white hipster douchebag 20-somethings want to simplify their habit. Now you can get high on your family skiing trips easier, or in your dorm. That it will somehow help the poor is a label you can conveniently apply to make it look like you are enriching our lives.

        Stop act like you are doing us a favor. If you gave a shit you'd help the poor rise above the entrapment of vices and the fucking vicious cycle of dependency and addiction. This whole pro-drug movement really feels like a way to destroy the lower class. Everyone else can get high conveniently and go to their rehab when things get out of hand, and the rest of us will drown in a sea of cheap, legal drugs.

      It's just another way to keep us down.

    2. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry "times are tough" is not an excuse for crime. Plenty of people have it tough, only a small percentage turn to crime.

    3. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " Quit applying technical fixes to social problems. Please. Pretty-please?"

      Oh, "Pretty-please" your oh-so-smug self, it's clearly not a fix, it's a temporary solution to an increasingly costly social problem.

    4. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Kymermosst · · Score: 1

      "Yes, people huff gasoline, they huff the propellant from Cheeze Whiz."

      Cheeze Whiz doesn't use propellant, it comes in a jar.

      You might have been thinking about Easy Cheese, which does use a propellant, but it's a bit hard to get to it the way the can is designed, as the propellant is in a separate sealed chamber from the product.

      --
      "Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives" should be a convenience store, not a government agency.
    5. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

      Because putting them in jail makes their lives less miserable.

      --
      "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
    6. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent tl;dr: "Poor people can't handle freedom and self-responsibility because you know, we're so *poor*. Stop pretending we're equal to you, and *please* start doing things to us for our own good (and don't bother asking us first, we'll just lie). PS. Freedom is slavery."

      I'm sorry you incorrectly believe that everyone in the world should be prohibited from something merely because you and your associates refuse to take responsibility for your own actions. Some of us can drink alcohol, buy a lottery ticket, or have the opportunity to take drugs without losing our jobs, family, health, etc.

      Yes, I hope you and your friends find it within *yourselves* to slay your demons. However, turning this country into a police state in a "War on (Some) Drugs" has cost us our freedom, our treasure, and obviously it *still* didn't keep your friends from abusing drugs.

      I believe you have it within yourself to have the power of freedom, even if you don't. The only thing keeping you down (in this regard) is your refusal to believe in yourselves, and then to effect the change you apparently want.

      More bluntly: you're keeping *yourselves* down, because ultimately you are the ones abusing drugs.

    7. Re:Ben Bernanke is the Copper Thief by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't ban those things because the inability to drive or squirt cheese is deemed worse than the potential for people to huff shit. Please. Pretty-please?

      Cheese doesn't come in cans. It just doesn't. Don't know what the hell you are squirting over there, but it sure ain't cheese. I don't care if the label says cheese. Stop calling it that. Please. Pretty-please?

  44. the sales aspect is easily solved by denbesten · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having worked in the recycling industry for years, solving the "sales" side of this is easy.

    A posted and implemented policy of paying by check if the payout is greater than $20 makes most of these problems go away.

    This works because large volumes comes in trucks and legitimate businesses generally prefer to receive a check (prevents employee skimming).

    After that, invest in a few video cameras, particularly one trained at the parking lot exit (to pick up rear license plates). Attach these to a motion-detecting video recorder and make sure you know how to burn DVDs. The few times we have had to involve law enforcement, they were pretty happy with a plate number and footage including a face and "the goods".

    So far, we have never had the check cashed, but if we did, the cops would then have a tie to the criminal's financial institution and we would join their case with a counter-suit to get our money back.

    Keep in mind that we really do not want to make an illegal buck, but at the same time, we also want to earn the legal bucks as efficiently as possible.

  45. Electricity by ledow · · Score: 1

    Love all the posts about using gloves etc., but the physicist in me didn't even bother with thinking about that.

    Get iron rod, shove in ground on side nearest the supply box (or one either side of you to make sure), join to fence using other iron rods or similar (literally a "now throw it on from here" connection with no risk). Then cut fence. Isn't that going to be more effective, shorting the fence to ground, than leaving it live in your hands? If you're really determined, find the source of the voltage and short close to that.

    Or failing that, just do what the local cable thieves do with train track and signalling copper when they steal it (if a crowbar across it isn't enough to make it safe by fusing / grounding the local supply). Attach large (non-conductive) hook from a safe distance (a plank of wood could probably always be sought that would long enough), drive off and take the fence with you. Hell, melt it down while you're at it.

    Stopping a thief who is ALREADY going to the lengths of breaking into a place and stealing cable (sometimes even live cable, and not always unsuccessfully) is going to need more than a little fence-zapper, which are quite common in ordinary households in some countries to keep even small livestock contained. Especially if the pay-off is more than a day's wages in copper.

    People in my country steal live railway tracks and miles of signalling cable in less than a minute and get away with it. An electric fence (which would be illegal in my country anyway) isn't going to hinder them *that* much.

    Almost all security measures rely on the fact that it attracts suspicion to circumvent them and hinders people for a brief moment to prevent casual theft. In reality, short of a guy with a gun you're not going to stop someone stealing something that's worth money. And even then, if it's worth enough, they'll just bring their own guns or pay him off.

    1. Re:Electricity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Electric fence illegal? Precisely BECAUSE it would work. I take it that in your nation, it has become too easy to become attorneys/advocates.You must live in a what is called a "right-to-crime" nation-state. Sounds like Europe or perhaps the Anglosphere (except South Africa).

      --
      If you have not spent all your mod points, I have not done my job.

  46. This is something new in the US? by Clifton+Beach · · Score: 1

    It's quite common in some parts of the world. Have a look at the tops of the walls in this Google Street View - A random street in Johannesburg.

    --
    42 hidden comments
  47. Not proportional because it's not continous DC by raymorris · · Score: 1

    "Amps and volts are proportional" ... "you don't get the amps". See how you realized they sometimes are NOT proportional? Ohm's law is for continous DC. Pulses are different. I'm sure you intuitively understand that the 12,000 volt spark you get when touching a metal object after walking on carpet is not a hundred times as powerful as sticking your finger in a light socket. Amps is basically the flow rate of electrons. Dividing pressure (voltage) by resistance will give you the flow rate, but there's no flow here. It's a pulse, more like getting hit with a fast moving drop of water, not a stream going through you.

  48. Metal Theif in Russia by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was an area in Russia where thieves cut down a high-tension wire. They shot a steel cable over the line, shorting it out and causing the breakers to pop. They then cut out a HUGE section before it could reset. They got nearly 2 miles of cable.

    The local power company replaced the cables. They finish working at the other end, and give the okay to turn on the power. Two miles downrange, see a huge flash, then they hear *BOOM!* The power goes offline again, and the repair team goes back to where the first cut was made.

    They find a grass fire. After putting it out, they find that the cable had been cut again, and was in the process of being coiled up by the thief.

    The thief had been standing in the middle of the coil when the power was turned on.

    All they found was a pair of boots, with feet inside them. Everything else had been vaporized.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Metal Theif in Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In Russia..."

      Is this the new code for "here's some urban legend bullshit that I can't be arsed thinking through"?

    2. Re:Metal Theif in Russia by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Have a link for that? Awesome story if it's true.

  49. First 4 results say electrcute = kill by raymorris · · Score: 1

    Aside from the definition Google shows in preview, the first four results in YOUR link all say electrocute = kill. Only the one displayed in full indicates it's ever used to mean injure. So four dictionaries say it means lethal, one doesn't. It's okay to be wrong, that's how we learn.

  50. Stupid copper thieves are stupid by aXis100 · · Score: 1

    A engineer mate of mine was working in Ghana and had a 2km fibre line installed to his house from the nearby gold plant so that he could get reliable remote access.....well he thought it was going to be reliable.

    Stupid local thieves trying to find copper dug down to the fibre line, cut it, and and then realised it wasn't copper. Now in a normal country, you might have a chance of pulling a bit of slack and resplicing, but not in Ghana. The thieves then continued to move down the line another ten metres or so and tried again. And again. Multiple cuts only to find that the same damn cable was still not copper. Farking Genius!

    The more electric fences the better I think.

  51. This is the best solution for stealing copper. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.kens5.com/news/Man-loses-arms-and-legs-in-copper-theft-83398667.html

  52. Someone already solved this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Poland. In response to rampant copper plundering they went to fiber. Treat it as a call to upgrade, not to bolster your defenses.

    1. Re:Someone already solved this. by aXis100 · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's amasing!!! All we have to do is wait for someone to figure out how to send substantial amounts of power down an optical fibre!!!

      Most of these copper thefts are electrical wiring, not communications. Yes you can use aluminium wire as an alternative but there are problems with that too. Least of which is that until they cut the cable they dont know, so you'll still get a lot of vandal related damage.

  53. Electric fences are pointless waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In South Africa they'll steal the fence. No kidding. You kan make it 7000V or 700000V. They'll make a plan.

  54. subject by Legion303 · · Score: 1

    TFA needs an editor even more than Slashdot does.

  55. My fence is 5,000 volts and safe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can hold the wire on my 5,000 volt electric fence almost comfortably. It delivers a tiny amount of current about once a second.

    Sure it's startling, but it's not dangerous. It startles animals so they take off running.

    Unless the article tells how many amps the fence delivers it missed the main specification.

  56. In the UK they steal from the railway. by _Shad0w_ · · Score: 2

    A lot of the cable theft in the UK is from the rail network, because it's almost all electrified using overhead power cables. Oddly this comes with its own inbuilt (mostly) 25 kV AC protection. It doesn't stop them. They also target the signal cables, which I think use high voltage as well.

    --

    Yeah, I had a sig once; I got bored of it.

  57. ahh! ahh! ahh! by swschrad · · Score: 1

    it is a right of passage for manly youth of the rural persuasion to test the fencers... once. I had the opportunity to check one back a quarter mile from Grandpa's, down on the old farm boundary of what was his land and that of Dad's friends.

    yep, it's working.

    hurts, but shouldn't put anybody on the ground.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  58. or if you live in Detroit Lakes, it's always on by swschrad · · Score: 2

    they have a nice little small town radio station in Detroit Lakes, MN with a nice little tower down near a lake, surrounded by grazing land. seems the cows kept breaking through the antenna feedline and putting them off the air.

    so they've got a wowzer electric fence protecting the feedline.

    probably has as much power as their dollar-a-holler station, for whenever you dial them in, you get the SNAP SNAP SNAP of their electric fence imposed on the broadcast signal.

    in Devils Lake, ND, they have a similar situation. except they buried their feedline in a duct. no fencer needed.

    --
    if this is supposed to be a new economy, how come they still want my old fashioned money?
  59. ultimate answer by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Or you could you know try and solve the whole rampent poverty situation so people wouldn't be inclined to steal copper wire to try and make a living.

    auto-targeting mini-guns would also work, but are only slightly less ridiclous.

  60. touch one with a magnet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i used to have an electric fence behind my house as a kid, so as you can imagine i have had plenty of experience with them (they werent particularly high voltage but it was enough to let you know if you touched one). i touched one with a magnet a few times and it was very strange.. it made my elbow jump (its the only way i can describe it), but without the magnet it was just a shock on the hand. anyone know why this is?

  61. Re:Laundry static is 20,000 volts, what's your poi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As you apparently have never heard that it is possible to limit a current, you should better stfu.