Slashdot Mirror


NASA: Curiosity Has Found Plastic On Mars

dsinc writes "Last week Curiosity was able to use its SAM (Sample Analysis at Mars) device to confirm the discovery. A robotic arm with a complex system of Spectral Analysis devices was able to vaporize and identify gasses from the sample, concluding that it is in fact plastic. How plastic formed or ended up on the Martian surface is quite an exciting mystery that sparks many questions. The type of plastic sampled as we know so far can only be formed using petrochemicals, meaning not only that there could possibly be a source of oil on the Red Planet, but that somehow it got turned into plastic. Even more interesting is that oil or petrochemicals used to create this type of plastic are only known to come from ancient fossilized organic materials, such as zooplankton and algae, which geochemical processes convert into oil pointing to the earthshaking evidence that there was once life on mars. 'Right now we have multiple working hypotheses, and each hypothesis makes certain predictions about things like what the spherules are made of and how they are distributed,' said Curiosity's principal investigator, Steve Squyres, of Cornell University. 'Our job as we explore Matijevic Hill in the months ahead will be to make the observations that will let us test all the hypotheses carefully, and find the one that best fits the observations.'" Update: Yes, it's a hoax

293 comments

  1. Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why doesn't Slashdot have them? Might as well be reader the National Inquirer. It's not April 1.

    1. Re:Editors... by Bradmont · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You're right, the linked website seems really fake... it's built to look like the nasa website, but is on a third-party domain. What's more, all the navigation icons actually take you to nasa's website. Has anyone ever actually heard of nasaupdatecenter.us before today?

    2. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The domain was registered on Nov 23. Very suspicious.

    3. Re:Editors... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought the real announcement was NASA found water and organic matter on venus:
      http://gizmodo.com/5964357/nasa-finds-water-and-organic-matter-in-mercury?tag=astronomy

    4. Re:Editors... by NFN_NLN · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Here is a direct link to NASA:

      "But the new observations have also raised new questions," adds Solomon. "Do the dark materials in the polar deposits consist mostly of organic compounds?

      http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/messenger/media/PressConf20121129.html

    5. Re:Editors... by MrEricSir · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Seems fake," huh? You mean the renderings of the Mars "face" on the front page didn't throw you off?

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    6. Re:Editors... by medgooroo · · Score: 0, Troll
      --
      Brain(s): 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.1% nice, 98.6% idle
    7. Re:Editors... by MtHuurne · · Score: 1

      The domain was registered less than a week ago and some of the registration data doesn't look valid. Also nasa.gov says "The next news conference about the NASA Mars rover Curiosity will be held at 9 a.m. Monday, Dec. 3, [...] Rumors and speculation that there are major new findings from the mission at this early stage are incorrect." So it's probably a fake.

    8. Re:Editors... by medgooroo · · Score: 0

      ok, helps if I actually read what I link... *sigh*

      --
      Brain(s): 0.0% user, 1.3% system, 0.1% nice, 98.6% idle
    9. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks like a ripoff of this press release:
      http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/news/mer20120928.html

    10. Re:Editors... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you think that's bad, the slashdot article last week that claimed that NASA was about to announce some big discovery on mars was also fake, or at least really REALLY exaggerated.

      http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2012/11/27/nasa_mars_discovery_misunderstanding_mission_leader_excited_about_entire.html

      You know whats sad, is the submitter commented that this article was fake before samzenpus moved it to the front page. Apparently some editors don't read the comments either. I'd say it more resembles digg.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    11. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just got it to HTTP 500.
      ServerAdmin e-mail is webmaster@nasaupdatecenter.chewbacchus.org . To me that second-level domain looks like a signature for this prank.

    12. Re:Editors... by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I've been around slashdot for probably at least a decade, and seen some pretty stupid crap here. But seriously, this takes the cake. No one else is reporting anything like this. The picture in the "article" is clearly a bad photoshop of mardi gras beads, and the front page of the linked site has a picture of Chewbacca superimposed on a Martian hill.

      I can maybe see samzenpus thinking that he had a real scoop on a big story, but he should have at least ran it by some of the other people there. Someone there must have at least a semi-functioning brain. Or maybe he could have looked into the domain registration, and seen that the domain was registered a few days ago to the leader of the New Orleans Bigfoot Society.

      Crap like this is a lot of why decent discussion on nerdy things is dying on this site.

    13. Re:Editors... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      That's also NOT a JPL press release. They can't keep Opportunity and Curiosity straight, talk about scientists "ranting" and capitalize Random words. The last is especially indicative of crackpottery.

    14. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Domain registered on Nov 23, 2012

    15. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ServerAdmin for this domain, as seen in error pages, is webmaster@nasaupdatecenter.chewbacchus.org. There's your signature for the prank.

    16. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whois Contacts do other stuff too.

      More from Xavier Jenks:
      http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2011/06/28/big-foot-real-or-imagined
      http://about.me/XavierJenks

      Adam Farrar:
      "CEO" Hostgator
      Site is also hosted by hostgator

    17. Re:Editors... by DragonTHC · · Score: 2

      I honestly thought that Martians left some mardi gras beads laying around. That was my first impression.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    18. Re:Editors... by Trepidity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The factor you're looking for is "capitalism". Ever since CmtrTaco retired, Slashdot decisions aren't made based on human intelligence, but on maximizing pageviews.

    19. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Registrant Name: Xavier Jenks
      Registrant Organization: NASA
      Registrant City: Cape Carnival

      'nuff said.

    20. Re:Editors... by hypnotik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, I have to say. This is absurd. I've been here since '98, '99. This is the worst I've seen it. Come on, some basic checking would be a start.

      Maybe it's time to auction off my userid.. Though I don't know why anyone would want it. There's just no prestige anymore.

      --
      (I was only an egg, but then I cracked)
    21. Re:Editors... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      "Do the dark materials in the polar deposits consist mostly of organic compounds?"

      Translation: Do the polar bears shit on the ice?

    22. Re:Editors... by forand · · Score: 2

      Mercury not Venus, but yes that was a legitimate announcement.

    23. Re:Editors... by Jstlook · · Score: 2

      The only reason I'm upset is because Slashdot editors are treating this as a 'Hoax'. It's not. It's crappy journalism reporting on some nutjobs' intellectual porn site as though it were news. What's next, reporting on the Onion press releases?
      I've been here for years, but slashdot getting bought out has really ruined the last toehold on reality and relevance they had.

      --
      ---jstlook ---For that is the way of Elves, for they say both yes AND no, and mean every word of it. --- J.R.R.T.
    24. Re:Editors... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      "Do the dark materials in the polar deposits consist mostly of organic compounds?"

      Translation: Do the polar bears shit on the ice?

      Only if they're armored.

    25. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vent pointlessly much? Responsible journalism died shortly after it's true power was realized (read Nixon). Sorry.

    26. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And here I thought the Martians developed marti gras before we did!

    27. Re:Editors... by girlintraining · · Score: 1, Informative

      I thought the real announcement was NASA found water and organic matter on venus

      Dude, you realize that if you took a pizza out of your freezer and held it up in the air on the surface of Venus, it would cook in about 8 seconds, right? Which is 7.98 seconds longer than it would take for the atmosphere to turn you (and the pizza) into a pancake and then spray your liquified remains about a half-kilometer downwind. I'd be very interested to hear about the technology NASA invented that would be capable of landing anything in such an inhospitable environment... or for that matter, simply making it to the surface still intact and somehow managing to communicate this fact to us.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    28. Re:Editors... by Trep · · Score: 5, Informative

      If this is some kind of joke that I'm missing, then I apologize. But if you are serious...then try googling first. The Russians did this a long time ago. AFAIK, NASA never attempted a lander though. Venera 13, in 1982, lasted about 2 hours before giving up the ghost.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera

    29. Re:Editors... by poofmeisterp · · Score: 1

      You're right, the linked website seems really fake... it's built to look like the nasa website, but is on a third-party domain. What's more, all the navigation icons actually take you to nasa's website. Has anyone ever actually heard of nasaupdatecenter.us before today?

      Did ya like the article number? 2012-420. HA.

    30. Re:Editors... by cusco · · Score: 1

      The Soviets did it in the 1960s, probably before you were born. The landers only lasted a few minutes to hours, but that was quite impressive considering the conditions. Look up the Venera spacecraft.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    31. Re:Editors... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative
    32. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real news would be if a mission was sent to the seventh planet to search for oceans of diamond.

      Headline - NASA sends probe into Uranus.

    33. Re:Editors... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      venus

      Mercury

    34. Re:Editors... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      I'd be very interested to hear about the technology NASA invented that would be capable of landing anything in such an inhospitable environment... or for that matter, simply making it to the surface still intact and somehow managing to communicate this fact to us.

      Lots of landers have operated on the surface of Venus.

    35. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Venera landers did. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venera_9

    36. Re:Editors... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I sadly concur. /. has become a joke (of its former glory.)

      Let some of us who are karma capped double check the stories OR allow us to post a SUMMARY of all the comments.

    37. Re:Editors... by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 1

      I'm still trying to figure out how the hell the freezer got on Mercury in the first place.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    38. Re:Editors... by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Why am I reading /. again? Oh for geek news that matters. Geeks use intelligence to filter out spam and hoaxes. Why is this hoax still up on /.? /. editors, are you really going to make me remove my bookmark for /.? Sigh.

    39. Re:Editors... by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      Editors...

      Why doesn't Slashdot have them?

      Because it has people like you, me, and all those who've noted in the discussion that this is a hoax.

      It has its problems, to be sure. So does a bazaar. So does a cathedral. But you go to different places to find different things. An agoraphobe can avoid the bustle of both places by staying in a walled garden, but he'll only see those things selected for him.

    40. Re:Editors... by cyn1c77 · · Score: 2

      You're right, the linked website seems really fake... it's built to look like the nasa website, but is on a third-party domain. What's more, all the navigation icons actually take you to nasa's website. Has anyone ever actually heard of nasaupdatecenter.us before today?

      Looking at the image of the green and purple plastic beads convinced me that it was fake.

      Nothing exposed on the surface is going to stay that color in the unshielded martial atmosphere, even if it dropped off the rover.

    41. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah no interest on slashdot for auctions not even charitable ones

    42. Re:Editors... by symbolset · · Score: 1

      It's a spoof. A beautiful one. Nicely done.

      --
      Help stamp out iliturcy.
    43. Re:Editors... by neyla · · Score: 2

      You could be surprisedd - Venera 7 - all the way back in 1970 successfully landed on the surface of Venus, and transmitted data back for 23 minutes before dying (somewhat prematurely because of a partial parachute-fail during landing)

      Al told, more than a dozen spacecraft has since then returned data after being inside venus atmosphere, and a handful of them has done so after having landed on the surface.

    44. Re:Editors... by iamhassi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So how did this get posted? Obvious fake is obvious, but whoever created the site could now change it to some spammy malware site and nothing can be done, it's already been linked to by /. and probably dozens of other sites, the fake site is probably top ranked on google now for dozens of search terms. This is not good /., things like this is why after 15 years I don't visit /. as much as I use to, and it's sad a site like reddit has better editors than /.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    45. Re:Editors... by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I have to say. This is absurd. I've been here since '98, '99. This is the worst I've seen it. Come on, some basic checking would be a start.

      Maybe it's time to auction off my userid.. Though I don't know why anyone would want it. There's just no prestige anymore.

      I started 98 or 99, you must have started early 98 since according to Wikipedia slashdot started sept 97

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    46. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sadly concur. /. has become a joke (of its former glory.)

      Let some of us who are karma capped double check the stories OR allow us to post a SUMMARY of all the comments.

      Most people posting no longer even browse TFA and now it seems to have spread to the editors. But what's to be expected? It's Apple and Android fanbois all the way down, some sort of semi-nerds with an app to grind.

    47. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You neglected to link to the website that finally really polished the few images the russians transmitted: images from venus

    48. Re:Editors... by ByteSlicer · · Score: 3, Informative

      It seems you never saw the cool (or should I say hot) pictures taken by the Soviet landers on Venus, so here you go.
      But yeah, it's extremely hostile. Curiosity most probably wouldn't make it to the surface.

    49. Re:Editors... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Martians have the advantage when it comes to Mardi Gras. They have 3 breasts if I totally recall...

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    50. Re:Editors... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      I suspect it was in a plane that got a little further than this WWII bomber...

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    51. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the fact that the "plastic" on the picture are strands of Mardi Gras beads? ;)

    52. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus their april 1st jokes are retarded.

    53. Re:Editors... by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I almost wonder if the editors have other responsibilities that VA Linux / Geeknet and now Dice put on them, thinking that running Slashdot couldn't possibly take much of their time. How much time do they have to actually examine submissions and edit them before posting?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    54. Re:Editors... by rubikscubejunkie · · Score: 1

      first off, it is The National Enquirer... if u can't get it right...then I can't comment on it.

    55. Re:Editors... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      First, there's the firehose. Stupid non-nerd slashdotters voted the story to the front page. Second, there is now an edit that says "update: Yes, it's a hoax."

      Don't blame the editors, blame the non-nerds that pollute the content here.

    56. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I totally AGREE

      Administrative:
      HostGator
      Adam Farrar
      11251 Northwest Fwy suite 400
      Houston, TX 77092 US
      +1.7135745287
      Fax +1.2814767800

      Technical:
      HostGator
      Adam Farrar
      11251 Northwest Fwy suite 400
      Houston, TX 77092 US
      +1.7135745287
      Fax +1.2814767800

      Nameserver:
      NS2831.HOSTGATOR.COM
      NS2832.HOSTGATOR.COM

      Updated-Date:
      Nov 23, 2012 06:29:37 AM

      Created-Date:
      Nov 23, 2012 06:16:09 AM

      Registration-Expiration-Date:
      Nov 22, 2013 11:59:59 PM

      Status:
      registrar-lock

      Domain:
      NASAUPDATECENTER.US

    57. Re:Editors... by godatum · · Score: 1

      Cut-em some slack. I think it's interesting to read some of the responses. Anyways, looks like the fake site crashed.

    58. Re:Editors... by SDotAnthony · · Score: 1

      Registrant Name: Xavier Jenks Registrant Organization: NASA Registrant City: Cape Carnival

      'nuff said.

      And you are?

    59. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Lone Gunmen edges this out.

    60. Re:Editors... by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      The last is ESPecially inDICative of CrackPottery.

      FTFY

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    61. Re:Editors... by ZecretZquirrel · · Score: 1

      Y'all got no sensayuma. Viva Chewbacchus!

    62. Re:Editors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think nasaupdatecenter.us may have fake information in the whois, meaning it may be in violation of dot-us's rules.

      However, Slashdot should step up and remove the offending link in the article. Maybe put it as "nasaupdatecenter dot us" instead of "nasaupdatecenter.us", without the quotes.

  2. MARS IS A FAKE! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

    The whole think was nudged into place by Stanley Kubrick.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:MARS IS A FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Jupiter?
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toynbee_tiles

    2. Re:MARS IS A FAKE! by rk · · Score: 2

      No. Kubrick put up Jupiter. Paul Verhoeven put Mars up.

    3. Re:MARS IS A FAKE! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

      Yes! You're on to the WHOLE THINK!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  3. Bloody tourists ... by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Funny

    dropping litter again. Why can't they take the plastic bags they brought their lunch in home with them!

    1. Re:Bloody tourists ... by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the photo? It looks more like a Mardi Gras necklace than a plastic bag.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:Bloody tourists ... by sycodon · · Score: 2

      The EPA is scouring Mars, looking for someone to fine.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Bloody tourists ... by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Ya, dammit! Those beads are the only way most of you are ever gonna get a girl to lift up her shirt! How could you not recognize them?

      Well, there's always Euro coins to make the screens go up in Amsterdam.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:Bloody tourists ... by slick7 · · Score: 1

      dropping litter again.

      Really? MasterCard or Visa? Or is it Pepsi or Coke?

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    5. Re:Bloody tourists ... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Obvious explanation. Aliens at Mardi Gras. They wouldn't stand out. Hope they didn't fly the saucer drunk.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    6. Re:Bloody tourists ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So totally! Just like the bead necklaces they were tossing of balconies on Burbon Street- I have several and they are the exact same colors too. Must have been quite a binge to have wandered drunk that far off course.

    7. Re:Bloody tourists ... by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      While a Martian sheds a tear on the roadside for his once pristine home.

  4. credit card? by aslvstr · · Score: 1

    After all the hype we find out someone left their credit card on Mars!

  5. Easy to spot a fake like this... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 4, Funny

    You can tell this is fake is because they messed up there. See, they said "earthshaking" when a legit article would have said "marsshaking", because this, of course, is on mars.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    1. Re:Easy to spot a fake like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, "Earthshaking" is correct. All those U.S. rockets launching to attack the invaders and defend the Fathe^h^h^h^h^hHomeland. Not to steal the oil. No reason to think that. Mars is where the terrorist are hiding.

  6. Huh ... by ryan.onsrc · · Score: 4, Funny

    It appears Martians have yet to ban single-use grocery bags ...

  7. Sporks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sporks!

  8. George Carlin, the prophet by ThePhilips · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hereby officially announce George Carlin to be our prophet.

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    1. Re:George Carlin, the prophet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh that was prophetic! I declare that he be seated at the right hand of the flying spaghetti monster!

  9. Inner System Garbage Patch by Modern · · Score: 1

    .... and we thought the oceans had it bad.

  10. Obvious question by Bogtha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are any parts of Curiosity made from plastic?

    --
    Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    1. Re:Obvious question by wiedzmin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's what took them so long to confirm the discovery - they were checking to make sure it wasn't a contamination from the rover.

      --
      Bow before me, for I am root.
    2. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's what I was thinking too.

      Bits of landing gear that melted during reentry, and then chemically combined with local materials.

      Would explain why they are round balls.

    3. Re:Obvious question by ColdWetDog · · Score: 0

      Apparently not 3 mm beads unless somebody's niece left their junk jewelry on the rover.

      How come only one low res picture, guys? I briefly looked at the MSL website and didn't see a higher res image. Anybody seen one?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Obvious question by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Oh, and, could NASA at least define plastic Wikipedia makes mention of 'synthetic or semi synthetic'. If it's just bits of the backshell / parachute / cover or whatnot - that's not terribly interesting. If it belongs to K'beel - that's an entirely different matter.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:Obvious question by mx+b · · Score: 1

      We have lost a few Mars missions over the years, haven't we? Is this rover in a new place where we can be fairly sure a previous mission didn't smash into the ground and leave debris behind in? (Although does Mars have nasty sandstorms? Perhaps wind could blow small chunks around anyway. I would want to see confirmation of plastic in several areas and from samples rather deep in the ground before I would consider it good proof. I guess the NASA guys would think this thru too though, perhaps it is a hoax).

    6. Re:Obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There are no higher res images because both the site, and the story linked to are entirely fake. This is about as obvious as being asked to log into BankOfAmerica.totallyLegitWebsite.com to reset your password.

    7. Re:Obvious question by Algae_94 · · Score: 2

      This story is entirely fake. Just look through the comments for more details on it.

    8. Re:Obvious question by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      But I trust NASA. I would never trust Bank of America.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  11. Sample contamination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    How do they know the plastic didn't come from Curiosity itself? There's no mention in TFA that the sample was ever checked for contamination.

    1. Re:Sample contamination by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 2

      No, it's not contamination. If you read the article, you can clearly see a picture of cheap beads that the hippie chicks that hang around Berkley wear.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    2. Re:Sample contamination by Hentes · · Score: 1

      That pic is obviously shopped.

    3. Re:Sample contamination by kaleth · · Score: 2

      Of course it is. I can tell by the pixels.

  12. I see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the joke.

  13. WHAT?!?!?!? by GoatCheez · · Score: 1

    Plastic?!?!?!?!?! What the fuck!?!?!??!?!

    1. Re:WHAT?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah. that...

  14. Are we sure by Noir+Angellus · · Score: 0

    it isn't packing/debris from the mission itself? Evidence of ancient life on mars would be great (and finding a chunk of formed plastic would be mind-blowing!) but the proof has to be irrefutable.

    1. Re:Are we sure by instagib · · Score: 1

      Could be decayed rests of a parachute from another mission. But hopefully it's something more exciting.

    2. Re:Are we sure by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's quite obviously photoshopped mardi gras beads.

  15. Makes sense by wiedzmin · · Score: 0

    Finally it makes sense what US is doing on Mars! Same thing they're doing everywhere else - getting their hands on the oil supplies under any pretense possible.

    --
    Bow before me, for I am root.
  16. Re:What is the probability? by NemosomeN · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you had read the article, you would have seen the photo, which is several strings of Mardi Gras beads on the Martian surface.

    --
    I hate grammar Nazi's.
  17. USA plans invasion by tahii · · Score: 3, Funny

    in 3, 2, 1...

    1. Re:USA plans invasion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding - we can't do that until we send one of those NRO satellites to Mars to confirm the martial WMD program they keep denying.

  18. When you find hoof-prints ... by bonoboboy · · Score: 0

    As the old saying goes, when you find hoof-prints, suspect horses, not zebras. In this case, I'm sure this is more likely some plastic that found its way from Earth. How much space junk do we have floating around our planet, again? Getting excited about oil from fossilized organisms on Mars seems a bit of a stretch here.

    1. Re:When you find hoof-prints ... by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      well, rattle this around in your brain ... the plastic was part of a larger machine encased in metal, and this is a very small remnent of it, the atmosphere doesnt burn every single particle to vapor, thats how shit hits planets

  19. Plastic??/ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean the planet has been replaced with a cheap plastic knock-off??? The Elders have a lot to answer for...

  20. 0.o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm speechless, the implications of this are HUGE.

    1 -- If there is oil on Mars I bet my ass we'll be there in 20 years.
    2 -- If there is _plastic_ on mars we are going to be hard pressed to figure out how it got there, plastics from petrochemicals are not a naturally occurring process. How the hell did it get there?
    3 -- Assuming we figure out how it got there, what implications could it have on our entire view of the universe and where we stand in it.

    Exciting times we live in.

    1. Re:0.o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I bet my ass we'll be there in 20 years.

      I'll take that bet, and your money. Glad we got that idiocy out of the way.

      > 2 [restates summary]

      > 3 -- Assuming we figure out how it got there, what implications could it have on our entire view of the universe and where we stand in it.

      If we know something new, what will it imply? Is this supposed to be a meaningful question? What will the implications imply? Nonsense. If you want to theorize, the implications are the same if it matches what we know as fact or want to believe is fact.

      How that trash post gets a positive mod from someone is really surprising. Shame on them.

    2. Re:0.o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1 -- If there is oil on Mars I bet my ass we'll be there in 20 years.

      Tell you what, I'll let you get in on the ground floor, and you can contract my company to get oil for you ... from Mars. Since it was your idea, I'll only charge you $1000 a kilo instead of $10k. Don't take too long to sign though, as at those rates, I'm sure to run out of production capacity in no time.

  21. Picture looks like Mardi Gras beads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Check it out...
    http://nasaupdatecenter.us/press.html

    Something seems strange here.

    1. Re:Picture looks like Mardi Gras beads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whois on nasaupdatecenter.us points to Cape Carnival (Mardi Gras...)

    2. Re:Picture looks like Mardi Gras beads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My office firewall (MCAfee brand) block that site as malicious.

    3. Re:Picture looks like Mardi Gras beads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In all fairness, McAffe firewalls tend to randomly block any site.

    4. Re:Picture looks like Mardi Gras beads... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is what people want though. I used to sell tiger repelling rocks, but someone decided to spread the myth such rocks don't do anything. So I had to go all v2.0, and modernize it. Now it is a tiger repelling robot that randomly kills house cats to show it is doing something.

  22. LMAO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    TROLLD HARD

    Slashdot is a joke..

  23. Oil on Mars by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Funny

    Suddenly, the United States will discover terrorists on Mars as well, and state that those terrorists intend to strike us unless we strike them first...

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Oil on Mars by Holammer · · Score: 1

      ... if that's what it takes to kickstart space exploration again... I'm all for it.

    2. Re:Oil on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Suddenly, the United States will discover terrorists on Mars as well, and state that those terrorists intend to strike us unless we strike them first...

      But wait a sec.... Terrorists DO INTEND to strike the United States and Americans abroad. And if we find them on Mars, we should strike first, nuke the entire planet. Terrorists are the scourge of mankind, and need to be eradicated anywhere they are found.

    3. Re:Oil on Mars by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Honestly, since Obama's been in office, I've been pretty impressed at the progress of NASA and private entities in expanding space exploration. Granted, we haven't got manned missions to other planets still, but those are some of the most expensive and safety-conscious missions available, and really the only place we can conceivably go right now is the moon again. What would that do for us, if anything?

      All that said, I would like to see a lunar space elevator be built. That would make the moon much more interesting.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  24. Check the URL by KermMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm amused how many people overlooked the fact that although all the links on the page go to jpl.nasa.gov, the site itself is fake. Didn't the Mardi Gras beads give it away?

    1. Re:Check the URL by GuldKalle · · Score: 2

      Xavier Jenks
      Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.
      admin@nasaupdatecenter.us

      NEWS RELEASE: 2012-420

      --
      What?
    2. Re:Check the URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      According to CheckDomain.com..

      nasaupdatecenter.us (United States)

      The domain that you requested, nasaupdatecenter.us, has already been registered by the organization below. Please click here to see other options for this name. As an alternative, you can also let the Domain Brokers from Sedo acquire nasaupdatecenter.us on the secondary market for you.

      Registrant:
      NASA
      Address:
      PO Box 791633
      Cape Carnival, FL 666666
      United States
      First Registered:
      November 23, 2012
      Last Updated:
      November 23, 2012
      Administrative Contact:
      Adam Farrar (D1645EF6572ACAAF) support@hostgator.com
      HostGator
      11251 Northwest Fwy suite 400
      Houston, TX
      United States
      Houston, TX
      US
      Phone: +1.7135745287
      Fax: +1.7135745287
      Billing Contact:
      Xavier Jenks (A82B3BEE4769052E) admin@nasaupdatecenter.us
      NASA
      PO Box 791633
      Cape Carnival, FL
      United States
      Cape Carnival, FL
      US
      Phone: +1.5043193013
      Technical Contact:
      Adam Farrar (D1645EF6572ACAAF) support@hostgator.com
      HostGator
      11251 Northwest Fwy suite 400
      Houston, TX
      United States
      Houston, TX
      US
      Phone: +1.7135745287
      Fax: +1.7135745287
      Name Servers:
      NS2831.HOSTGATOR.COM
      NS2832.HOSTGATOR.COM
      Information Source:
      NeuStar
      Check this domain:
      [ Home | Countries | Disclaimer | FAQ | Link to us | Contact us ]

      © Copyright 2007, Unica Corporation. All Rights Reserved

    3. Re:Check the URL by Spottywot · · Score: 1

      Yes, clearly fake, but quite well done nonetheless. Made me smile.

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
    4. Re:Check the URL by pclminion · · Score: 1

      "Cape Carnival?"

    5. Re:Check the URL by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Goddammit. We've been had!

      Nice work, whomever.

      And if you don't believe me, go to the home page.

      Sigh.

      Whois:

      Whois query for nasaupdatecenter.us...

      Results returned from whois.nic.us:

      Domain Name: NASAUPDATECENTER.US
      Sponsoring Registrar: ENOM, INC.

      Registrant Name: Xavier Jenks,
      Registrant Organization: NASA,
      Registrant Address1:PO Box 791633
      Registrant City: Cape Carnival
      Registrant State/Province: FL
      Registrant Postal Code: 666666

      Cape Carnival?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Check the URL by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      It lost it by the end of the article. Maybe that was on purpose to tip off the gullible, or maybe the author just got tired of pretending to be educated.

    7. Re:Check the URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought Mardi Gras beads were always found near (o)(o)

    8. Re:Check the URL by riverat1 · · Score: 1

      If they found Mardi Gras beads the name would be appropriate.

    9. Re:Check the URL by jspoon · · Score: 1

      "Cape Carnival?" Yeah, like he would have gotten away with the elaborate deception if it weren't for autocorrect.

  25. Mardi Gras on Mars? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who thinks that picture looks like a set of Mardi Gras beads? Maybe the Therns have a closet somewhere in New Orleans...

  26. i like the billing address for that site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    whois nasaupdatecenter.us

    Billing Contact City: Cape Carnival

    1. Re:i like the billing address for that site by unkiereamus · · Score: 2
      If you look a little closer:

      Registrant Name Xavier Jenks
      Registrant Organization NASA
      Registrant Address1 PO Box 791633
      Registrant City Cape Carnival
      Registrant State/Province FL
      Registrant Postal Code 666666

      Quite aside from the festive town, there's the postal code, but my favorite bit is Googling for "Xavier Jenks" The third result (the first two are Facebook) is: http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2011/06/28/big-foot-real-or-imagined

      Which includes this little nugget:

      Dr. Xavier Jenks, PhD
      Research Team Leader
      New Orleans Bigfoot Society (N.O.B.S.)

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
  27. Fell off the aircraft.. lol Or... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    from the looks of it, it had a new orleans of it's own. Probably used to be full of babes with 3 titties like total recall LOL :)

  28. Not sure if the Pic is real, but... by Nyder · · Score: 1

    ... looks like they have Mardi Gras on Mars at some point.

    but seriously, that is really a cool find. Maybe it will get some more funding going, after all, there could be oil on mars now...

     

    --
    Be seeing you...
  29. Maybe it landed on a cheap planet from China by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 2

    Did they get the right Mars? Or did they land on some cheap knock-off planet from China?

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  30. Hoax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This article posted is almost copied verbatim from http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20120928a.html, with only a few words changed around. Plus, the css pages link offsite and are broken on that page. Who fell for this?

    1. Re:Hoax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Me.
      I have spent too much time bouncing from mildly interesting site to mildly interesting site to check the authenticity of everything not obviously bullshit (unless involved in my finances).

    2. Re:Hoax! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Well, it was curious (ha), but thought at first maybe it could have been an "artist's rendering" or some intern put in charge. Maybe it was some site that republished NASA info but with shiny pictures for the kids and they completely got some facts wrong or were putting in some unfounded extrapolations. But it got too strange once I started some odd phrasing and then none of the links that went to NASA actually showed anything related.

  31. Mardi Gras beads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The martians loved to party!

  32. Well Well by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

    Nice move NASA, nice move indeed, i can see those budget cuts may need a second opinion.

  33. Nestene Consciousness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First episode of the new Doctor Who series wasn't THAT crazy after all.

  34. Hoax by zienth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Hoax. The press release at http://nasaupdatecenter.us/press.html says that Curiosity is at Matijevic Hill, overlooking Endeavour Crater. Curiosity is inside of Gale Crater. Opportunity is at Matijevic Hill. Nasa posts its press releases at nasa.gov sites.

    1. Re:hoax by slew · · Score: 0

      How did this get past the editors?

      Q: Who are these "editors" you speak of?
      A: They’re a comedy team.
      Q: Tell me about them. Everything.
      A: Well, they’re three kind of funny looking guys and they hit each other a lot.
      Q: You will show me the "editors"?
      A: I will show you the "editors".
      Q: When?
      A: Well, I don’t really know where the "editors" are right now but if I locate them you will be the first to know.

  35. NASA's own commentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from www.nasa.gov:

    Update Set About Curiosity Mars Rover

    NASA will provide a Curiosity update at 9 a.m. Monday, Dec. 3, at the American Geophysical Union. Rumors of major new findings at this early stage are incorrect.

    The news conference will discuss Curiosity's use of instruments to investigate a drift of sandy soil. Audio and visuals from the briefing will be available via UStream.

  36. Funny shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like http://nasaupdatecenter.us/
    is a joke/troll site

    "Face on Mars re-examined after new plastic discovery." .. With a bad Photoshop of chewy superimposed.

    1. Re:Funny shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. You'll notice all the links go to .gov websites, except the top two very obvious troll links.

      Seriously Slashdot, you've gone full retard.

  37. Fake story, fake URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://nasaupdatecenter.us/ is not a NASA website

  38. Slashdot has been trolled by johnny+cashed · · Score: 5, Informative

    That isn't a genuine press release. Here is the real release: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl/news/whatsnew/index.cfm?FuseAction=ShowNews&NewsID=1398

    1. Re:Slashdot has been trolled by choprboy · · Score: 1

      Agreed... Once again the Slashdot editors have failed to do the most trivial investigation before posting articles. In this case the alleged JPL article is at: http://nasaupdatecenter.us/press.html.

      Since when is "nasaupdatecenter.us" an official JPL website?
      Why is it that this website has no content other than this article and every weblink points to the real site "marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov"?
      Why is it that this site has the "news", but no such story on the real JPL website press releases: http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/

      Perhaps more importantly.... do Slashdot editors enter all their bank account details on every phishing website they get any email for? What makes this any different?.....

    2. Re:Slashdot has been trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why hasn't this been pulled from Slashdot yet?

  39. Mission is a fake by linear+a · · Score: 1

    Obviously the whole "people sent stuff to Mars" is a sham like the moon missions. The laser just cut down into the bottom of the stage.

  40. nasaupdatecenter.us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Registered 6 days ago by Xavier Jenks.

  41. FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Domain Name NASAUPDATECENTER.US
    Domain ID D38204419-US
    Sponsoring Registrar ENOM, INC.
    Registrar URL (registration services) whois.enom.com
    Domain Status clientTransferProhibited
    Registrant ID A82B3BEE4769052E
    Registrant Name Xavier Jenks
    Registrant Organization NASA
    Registrant Address1 PO Box 791633
    Registrant City Cape Carnival
    Registrant State/Province FL
    Registrant Postal Code 666666
    Registrant Country United States
    Registrant Country Code US
    Registrant Phone Number +1.5043193013
    Registrant Email admin@nasaupdatecenter.us

    http://www.facebook.com/xavier.jenks -- Head researcher at New Orleans Bigfoot Society.

    1. Re:FAKE! by Megahard · · Score: 1

      Can NASA/JPL do anything about their name being used in the registration, and logos on the site?

      --
      I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    2. Re:FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Same AC as parent...yes I should just login)

      Possibly, they are rehosting quite a bit of nasa content at the least since the server allows directory listings http://nasaupdatecenter.us/Mars%20Exploration%20Rover%20Mission%20%20Home_files/

      I may or may not do some actual prodding on the server at this point.

    3. Re:FAKE! by citizenr · · Score: 1

      http://www.facebook.com/xavier.jenks -- Head researcher at New Orleans Bigfoot Society.

      ah, one of those reality tv clowns

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    4. Re:FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds about right. Error page (such as from http://nasaupdatecenter.us/Mars%20Exploration%20Rover%20Mission%20%20Home_files/Mars%20Exploration%20Rover%20Mission%20%20Home.htm) has admin email address at http://chewbacchus.org

    5. Re:FAKE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i doubt it. he'll just claim his NASA stands for Not Another Space Agency

    6. Re:FAKE! by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Why? It's a parody, and a pretty good one. I bet the people at NASA/JPL are cracking up right now. (the "Cape Carnival" and obvious Mardi Gras beads in the photo are a good touch).

    7. Re:FAKE! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Since all copyrights generated by NASA belong to the American Public, i would say no.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:FAKE! by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      Not so sure about that:

      NASA still images; audio files; video; and computer files used in the rendition of 3-dimensional models, such as texture maps and polygon data in any format, generally are not copyrighted. You may use NASA imagery, video, audio, and data files used for the rendition of 3-dimensional models for educational or informational purposes, including photo collections, textbooks, public exhibits, computer graphical simulations and Internet Web pages. This general permission extends to personal Web pages.

      This general permission does not extend to use of the NASA insignia logo (the blue "meatball" insignia), the retired NASA logotype (the red "worm" logo) and the NASA seal. These images may not be used by persons who are not NASA employees or on products (including Web pages) that are not NASA-sponsored.

      From here.

    9. Re:FAKE! by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      They can say it all they want, but as long as im not perpetrating a fraud, the logo is fair game, now matter how much they dont like it. Further, it is not their permission to grant or deny, as the entirety of their work is owned by the American Public, period. Technically, they have no standing to wall it off. Practically, is another matter. It leaves the realm of Truth and enters the realm of 'Because we said so' .

      --
      Good-bye
  42. who approved this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nasaupdatecenter.us? I can't find anything else on this. I call shenanigans. They did a good job on making the site look like NASA though.

    1. Re:who approved this? by GloomE · · Score: 1

      Next thing you know Slashdot will be accepting stories from The Onion as legitimate and you know nobody is that stupid...

  43. YHBT by rk · · Score: 1

    HTH. HAND.

  44. Fark's *obvious* tag comes to mind by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna meta-mod u down for *obvious* lol

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  45. The Great Pacific Garbage Patch... by Huge_UID · · Score: 2

    ... is larger than we thought.

  46. Fake by Hentes · · Score: 4, Informative

    From NASA:

    The next news conference about the NASA Mars rover Curiosity will be held at 9 a.m. Monday, Dec. 3, in San Francisco at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

      Rumors and speculation that there are major new findings from the mission at this early stage are incorrect. The news conference will be an update about first use of the rover's full array of analytical instruments to investigate a drift of sandy soil. One class of substances Curiosity is checking for is organic compounds -- carbon-containing chemicals that can be ingredients for life. At this point in the mission, the instruments on the rover have not detected any definitive evidence of Martian organics.

  47. News for March 11th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is discovered that a small part of the rover's front left wheel has come away. While NASA are not certain, they believe this to be a simpler explanation of the source of plastic found in November than past life on Mars.

  48. Is this an intentional joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell is nasaupdatecenter.us and why is it not linked from anywhere within nasa.gov? What's with the too-simple URL? How is this not a huge fake? Come on, there's no trace of it even in the Internet Archive.
    Is this an intentional joke?

  49. Position of mars in orbit? by gmuslera · · Score: 2

    Could be April 1st up there

    1. Re:Position of mars in orbit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must be it. It's definitely not April 1st down here - I checked.

  50. Fake by rbprbp · · Score: 1

    Check the whois info: http://whois.net/whois/nasaupdatecenter.us Unless there's a new 'Cape Carnival' with postcode '666666'... I call it a (well-done) fake.

    --
    They're there in their room. You're on your own.
  51. This is a hoax! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It is quite obvious that this original article was modified:
    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/mer/news/mer20120928.html
    A very obvious hoax!

  52. Website is FAKE Re:Check the URL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Some more search, using the administrative info on D1645EF6572ACAAF:

    https://www.google.com/search?q=D1645EF6572ACAAF

    Check by yourself, the website is almost certainly fake.

  53. Bigfoot by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Informative

    I might also point out that "Xavier Jenks" also runs a website about bigfoot.

    But sure, he's totally the kind of reliable source we've come to expect on Slashdot.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:Bigfoot by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      http://www.foxnews.com/science/2012/11/27/bigfoot-is-part-human-dna-study-claims/

      Yeah, I was really surprised when I saw this on an ABC news channel this morning. Still skeptical. This link says it's just Rority. ;)

    2. Re:Bigfoot by shaitand · · Score: 1

      You need to update your crackpot sensors. I'm not saying anything about "Xavier Jenks" but bigfoot is the kneejerk haha that really shouldn't be. The evidence for bigfoot isn't conclusive but it certainly isn't non-existent and as it stands the preponderance points to the species existing. That isn't enough to proclaim bigfoot as real but it is enough that that those engaged in serious investigation of the matter should not be labeled crackpots and their work should not be dismissed out of hand when they try to get published. Even Jane Goodall believes that there is a reasonable possibility that such a primate species exists and I hear she knows something about primates.

      Bigfoot is not an extraordinary claim. All sorts of species are rumored to exist and have not yet been reliably confirmed. These species are found all the time. Just because there is a cult following has grown around this species doesn't mean the standard for proof should be adjusted.

  54. Re:frosty piss by danomac · · Score: 0

    Looks like slashdot got hoodwinked!

  55. Fake by CastIronStove · · Score: 1

    Nasaupdatecenter.us. Really?

    The press release was lazily copied, with a few changes, from Nasa's September 28th press release. The front page of nasaupdatecenter.us says that the Mars face is being revisited based on this new plastic discovery. And the site itself was only registered last Friday (according to whois).

  56. hoax by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Hang on, now. Check how the text in TFA matches this article.

    You've been had.

    The clue (besides the rather obvious mardi-gras beads in the photo) was the eighth paragraph. Curiosity hasn't been on Mars for eight and a half years. Opportunity has.

    It's time for someone to stand up and say "Bazinga".

    How did this get past the editors?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  57. It is 2012..... by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

    and we found plastic on Mars.

    The Vatican is shaking....

    1. Re:It is 2012..... by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      The Vatican is open to the possibility of alien life, if you're implying that this would threaten them. Indeed, there's no solid reason they should be threatened by it.

      I'm afraid this article calls for a slightly more critical eye, in any case. Look at the URL. Now, look at the URL of any of the link in TFA. See something odd?

  58. Late-Breaking News: PSYOPS! by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
    Laughter and derision swept across our fair red world today as the Council of Elders confirmed the success of an intelligence coup against the green diagonally-tilted controlling intelligences (and their accompanying green spherule-shaped periodic functions) who continue to operate from undisclosed locations on the sinister blue planet.

    K'Breel, Speaker for the Council, spoke thus:

    Today marks another victory in our ongoing psyops campaign against the blueworlders. Renjoice, podmates, at the consternation of our enemies! On the homefront, our forces continue to track and monitor the intruder's activity. Laser-resistance is not the only means we have to defeat the intruder. Late-breaking news indicate great results achieved through our psychological operations division.

    When an elder member of the press corps suggested the psyops campaign in question consisted merely of deceiving "Editing Unit #5" into linking to http://nasaupdatecenter.us/press.html instead of http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20120928a.html, K'Breel had the young reporter's gelsacs slashed, after which the small, rounded particles were first catalyzed into plastic, and upon further heating, reduced to volcanic lapilli.

    (An audio recording of Reporter #54550 screaming "Sorry, samzenpus, you put your foot in it today, I swear to CmdrTaco it wasn't me! No hard feelings! Don't devitrify me, 'bro!" as he was led away to the thermal polymerization chamber, has not been authenticated.)

    1. Re:Late-Breaking News: PSYOPS! by miles+zarathustra · · Score: 0

      LOL ...

      Slashdot needs a "like" button.

    2. Re:Late-Breaking News: PSYOPS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL ... Slashdot needs a "like" button.

      Upon viewing the beads, the Speaker is rumored to have said "Gelsacs or GTFO!"

    3. Re:Late-Breaking News: PSYOPS! by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 2

      More like stories need a "dislike" or mod option: -1 EditorTooLazy

  59. hoax, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hoax but no ads... now someone needs to go through the page and check for some drive by malware crap.

    1. Re:hoax, but by ub3r+n3u7r4l1st · · Score: 1

      That's what NoScript is for.

  60. Proponents of Abiogenic Petroleum were right. by hsthompson69 · · Score: 0

    Now it's quite possible that some of the natural petroleum sources on our planet were in fact from dead fish, but this seems to give a significant boost to those who have asserted that Abiogenic petroleum is not only *possible* but perhaps even more common that biogenic petroleum.

    Fascinating stuff.

    1. Re:Proponents of Abiogenic Petroleum were right. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yup, this article definitely has some things in common with many of the abiogenic petroleum believers.

  61. Ridiculous story: obvious fake by FridayBob · · Score: 1

    For starters, the story mixes two things up: it speaks of the new rover, Curiosity, exploring a site on the western rim of Endurance Crater that was discovered by the Opportunity rover. It even quotes Steve Squyres as saying, "We wouldn't have gotten to Matijevic Hill, eight-and-a-half years after Curiosity's landing, without Jake Matijevic." He would never have said that: Squyers is principal investigator of the Mars Exploration Rover Mission (MER) -- Spirit and Opportunity -- not Curiosity, and Curiosity has only been on Mars since the 5th of August this year.

  62. Mardi Gras beads? by morethanapapercert · · Score: 1

    The accompanying picture to the article makes the find looks suspiciously like Mardi Gras beads. I know of the drunken revellers have bad aim, but I don't think anyone could have managed a toss of that magnitude!

    --
    I need a wheelchair van for my son. Help me get the word out. https://www.gofundme.com/wheelchair-van-for-jj
  63. Missing the point! by Nicros · · Score: 1

    But but but.... where are the boobs that were flashed to get the beads?! She must have been smashed to end up on mars.

  64. not the why, the end-reult of a broken system by Press2ToContinue · · Score: 3, Interesting

    hah crap like this isn't the reason why, it's the logical conclusion of /.'s no-data-ownership model. it's the emperical evidence that the ship has no rudder.

    --
    Sent from my ENIAC
  65. Is this a hoax? by sateh · · Score: 1

    Is that article written by the same Xavier Jenks who wrote this press release about Big Foot?

    http://www.bestofneworleans.com/blogofneworleans/archives/2011/06/28/big-foot-real-or-imagined

    Also, this press release is nowhere to be found on the NASA site.

    Also the NASAUPDATECENTER.US domain was registered a week ago and does not seem to have any connection to NASA.

    I am going to call it a hoax.

  66. Mardi Gras on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you throw them beads the women on Mars will flash all three of their breasts at you.

    I totally go every year. It's a party.

  67. Martians don't recycle? by kawabago · · Score: 1

    Someone at Mardi Gras got so high they lost their beads on Mars! I have got to go to Mardi Gras!

  68. perhaps we are to blame by hammarlund · · Score: 1

    Since there have been several previous spacecraft sent to Mars, I would think the first place to look would be the bill of materials used in these other craft. Just a thought.

  69. How about this clue by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    NOBODY ELSE IS REPORTING IT!

    Plastics don't form in nature. Certainly not in beads. For plastics to be found so readily and easily on Mars would be GIGANTIC news far bigger in fact then "discovering life" in the form of actually living cells. Since the FAKE article claims they are plastic beads as found on cheap necklaces, even if that is an artist interpretation of this FAKE news, it would lead NOT to speculation of life on Mars but on speculation of INTELLIGENT life on Mars capable of plastic production. That would NOT be announced through a press release on a web page but during a "we interrupt this broadcast" moment with an announcement the President would soon make a statement.

    And Samzenpus who should know by know Slashdot is NEVER the first with any news, even about slashdot itself, ran the story without even bothering to check other news sources for this earth shattering news.

    Extra ordinary claims in science need extra ordinary evidence. And extra ordinary news needs more then one source.

    The only answer for Samzenpus is to add a new moderation option so we can BAN people who took this news serious without first bothering to check some real news sites to see if any of them had picked it up. I only saw this story after just visiting several news sites and was immediately suspicious that such a huge thing would not have been on any real news site already.

    Even more suspicious, the story was posted so quickly the usual inane editor comment is missing.

    Nice work Samzenpus. But we all know you are a lousy editor, the real shame is on all the readers who react with anything else then scorn at this obvious fake and are taking this as a real story.

    hsthompson69 for instance below. For shame!

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:How about this clue by roc97007 · · Score: 2

      You're right. I cautiously approached the article because so many others were treating it as true, and even though it seemed ... wildly unlikely ... I wanted some proof, not that it was scientifically unlikely to the point of impossibility, but that it matched the characteristics of a hoax. In a surprisingly short time I found three "hoax" factors: The article is not self-consistent, parts unrelated to the claim are demonstrably untrue, and an original exists from which the article was obviously cut-and-pasted.

      The web page is a beautiful mock-up. It's too bad that the writers didn't spend a little more time on the wordsmithing. Just reading through the text, one gets an idea that something is wrong, even if one doesn't know jack about science.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  70. Serious decline in editorial quality. by RMingin · · Score: 2

    Wow, unmitigated, unconfirmed, completely fabricated BULLSHIT on the front page of Slashdot?? Maybe things really are done here.

    A quick Google search with any of a number of sections of the fake 'plastics' article turn up the real NASA article talking about iron-rich pellets, but the picture of fucking MARDI GRAS BEADS in the upper right might have been a clue.

    Samzenpus, you should be ashamed.

    --
    The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
    1. Re:Serious decline in editorial quality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who are the guys picking up these to the front page for EVERYBODY TO SEE? No filters at all. Nice...

  71. OK so.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is obviously fake, but what of the "earth shattering" news from many days ago?

  72. The non mardi gras bead photo by skratchjerk · · Score: 1

    Uh... also that photo is obviously this one: http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/multimedia/images/?ImageID=4806

  73. Fake, but somewhat based on a true story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First off, as everyone has already pointed out, of course this is fake. There has been no Martian plastic found by Curiosity or any other Mars exploration mission. The definitive proof this article is full of it? The Mars Exploration Rover Opportunity is at Matijevic Hill right now, several hundred miles away from Curiosity who is at a land formation known as Glenelg at the moment. A rock near the Curiosity landing sight was named after Jake Matijevic as well, but a rock is distinctly different from a hill.

    Besides the location error, this "story" seems to be pretty well researched. Curiosity spent a day a month ago looking at an unknown object it found on the ground that turned out to be a bit of plastic from the rover itself, not from Mars. The story could be spawned from that as well as all the "earthshaking discovery" hoopla surrounding MSL and the SAM instrument.

  74. Garble by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

    The article's really garbled. It uses "Curiousity" to mean "Opportunity" several times.

  75. That's it for me by Angst+Badger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are times when I have to endure the company of appallingly stupid people, but they all involve either getting paid or public transportation. Slashdot is neither of these, and I am fucking done. When I find myself missing the expert guidance of CmdrTaco, it is well past time to move on.

    --
    Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    1. Re:That's it for me by Nimey · · Score: 2

      When I find myself missing the expert guidance of CmdrTaco, it is well past time to move on.

      You made me snort spit into my nose.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    2. Re:That's it for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2nd! How many years looking at this site and never once did question it's credibility. Now I guess I have to. I miss CmdrTaco!

    3. Re:That's it for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If done, why not post your password? It'll take - what - 5 mins for you to be "done done" and not just "done".

    4. Re:That's it for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proudly AC since 2003, and feel the same as you now. There is no [more] place like Slashdot.

  76. It's easy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone else was there exploring first, in secret, and plastic fell off their robot!

  77. Delete this garbage by Georules · · Score: 1

    Obviously fake article is obviously fake.

  78. plastic by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

    So that's where http://www.plastic.com/ went!

  79. It's a hoax, yes by Nimey · · Score: 1

    but consider the lulz if it turns out that this is in fact true.

    I really doubt it will be, but just imagine that meta-troll: trolled into posting a hoax article, on a site owned by a crank, who actually got some good information and nobody believed it.

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
  80. Trolled so hard by smg5266 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was flipping out. Now I feel dumb. My only solace is that Slashdot looks a lot dumber than me.

    1. Re:Trolled so hard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good to know the review process works right.

    2. Re:Trolled so hard by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      I was flipping out. Now I feel dumb. My only solace is that Slashdot looks a lot dumber than me.

      I started off assuming it was from the lander but when I got to the part where it stated that petrochemicals only come from life forms that I knew it was BS. The same kind of hydrocarbons have been found on moons in this solar system where it's assumed there's no life. I never even bothered to look at the hoax web site.

  81. trollface.jpg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just got TRICKED

  82. Colorful Language? by RedDeadThumb · · Score: 1

    From that press release: "and its Curiosity rover are less than four months into a two-year prime mission to investigate".

    What exactly is a "two-year prime mission"? Is that like "2 years !"? 2! years == 2 factorial years == 2 * 1 years == 2 years. So essentially it is a fancy redundant way of saying it is a two year mission.

    Or maybe they mean that it is a "prime" mission in the sense of a "prime" cut of beef? It really is a super-duper A1 top mission. Not one of those crappy lesser missions we are always hearing about.

    1. Re:Colorful Language? by Megane · · Score: 1

      That's the warranty period. Spirit and Opportunity only had a 90 day warranty because JPL purchased them at Radio Shack.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  83. Sad by ntropia · · Score: 1

    Please, no. I can't believe we're that low... [picture the last face of Switch in Matrix]

  84. Source Checking by olsonish · · Score: 1

    Do we really have to start source and fact checking ./ postings? Rubbish. Stuff like this hitting the front page are the beginnings of the end of ./ credibility. Those of you posting stuff to this site should consider that as well, unless this was some kind of malicious act with that very kind of reputation destruction in mind, in which case good job mission accomplished.

  85. CmdrTaco by gr8_phk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And now we know why Taco left.

    1. Re:CmdrTaco by Grayhand · · Score: 1

      And now we know why Taco left.

      He actually posted the story under an alias for a laugh.

  86. Out with the bad editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    samzenpus should quit. Slashdot needs EDITORS and not idiots.

  87. Score:5? Venus is not Mercury by GPS+Pilot · · Score: 3, Informative

    The ice was found on Mercury.

    --
    That that is is that that that that is not is not.
  88. DMCA takedown? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    Looks like Xavier Jenks is violating NASA's copyrights.

  89. Re:What is the probability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I felt so stupid, I just assumed it was an illustration of a plastics molecule, and I didn't even think to give the photo a second thought :)

  90. Syphilis... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To bad the US can't fake it's way out of the DNA that proves it uses a weaponized form of Syphilis on it's own intelligence personnel (really the exact same DNA is found only in ppl who had SAP access really?)

    God you would think after loosing all targeting capability in that whole Timely Inc fiasco over a decade ago and just now found out about - you think they would have learned their lesson and let ppl live free right? oh well it only gets worse from here...

  91. Fucking hell Slashdot by wallbase · · Score: 1

    Oi, Slashdot peeps - aren't you even the slightest bit embarrassed at how low this lack of editorial oversight has become? Why don't you at least push out a press release stating that you are aware of concerns and are going to try to make things better? The continued silence despite all the complaints is deafening.

    I don't understand why those running Slashdot have such a lack of respect for its readership.

    --
    Dude...
  92. Lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, Ive never seen a hoax story on slashdot before. Time to find a new homepage.

  93. Update: Yes, it's a hoax by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    The recycling mark was a dead giveaway.

  94. THIS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    THIS! ... ?.

    So THIS is the 'BIG' announcement.

    Well.

    The Days of NASA are drawing to an end. Good for that.

  95. Fake registration of the website? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.whois.us/
    Enter "nasaupdatecenter.us" without the quotes.
    "Registrant Postal Code 666666"
    That's fake, or am I missing something?
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.us#Restrictions_on_use_of_.us_domains
    "Registrants are required to provide complete contact information without omissions."

    Is the site in violation? Because this is so not funny. There is nothing apparent on the nasaupdatecenter.us site to indicate it is a parody or satire.

  96. The true news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That report was adapted from:

    http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressreleases/20120928a.html

    "PASADENA, Calif. -- NASA's Mars rover Opportunity, well into its ninth year on Mars, will work for the next several weeks or months at a site with some of the mission's most intriguing geological features.

    The site, called "Matijevic Hill," overlooks 14-mile-wide (22-kilometer-wide) Endeavour Crater. Opportunity has begun investigating the site's concentration of small spherical objects reminiscent of, but different from, the iron-rich spheres nicknamed "blueberries" at the rover's landing site nearly 22 driving miles ago (35 kilometers)."

  97. has the slashdot staff been replaced w/monkeys? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    "Update: Yes, it's a hoax" it seems 10 out of 10 commentors here did not believe it either, hmmm. I kid you not, I read almost every comment and zero people bought it. Who let this story slip by? It's not some little side story, it's plastic on Mars. You'd think they'd look around for the best article to link to and read up on the amazing discovery, etc. That or notice that the mouseover images on the nav bars are missing. WTF?!

    1. Re:has the slashdot staff been replaced w/monkeys? by cervesaebraciator · · Score: 1

      It's clearly a fake, but look at more of the comments. Numerous commenters above (some, it seems, not getting the joke) discuss seriously the implications of this, hinting that this might get NASA more funding. "Hey, there's oil," they say, "we know that the U.S. Congress will appropriate funds for that."

      It costs $83,000 to get a gallon of water just into low earth orbit. Crude oil's at about $2 a gallon ($87.73/barrel). I fear some might need it spelled out. After all, this wasn't rejected in the firehose.

  98. Curiosity has found plastic on Mars... by Pesticidal · · Score: 1

    ...and Slashdot has lost another user. Seriously I would delete my account if I could. Bye!

  99. Re:frosty piss by multicoregeneral · · Score: 0

    It may be a glass of frosty piss, but it's a delicious and tantalizing glass of frosty piss. Hats off to the hucksters.

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank.
  100. okay, slashdot, what are you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A news site, or a gag site.

  101. Well, I lol'd by rve · · Score: 1

    Why so angry? It's a good joke, you should laugh. It's probably made by a /. reader.

  102. Slashdot needs a better news source by Grayhand · · Score: 1

    Might I suggest China's favorite source for accurate news. http://www.theonion.com/

  103. OIL?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now we're talking.

  104. With all the failed mars landers by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    With all the failed mars landers that have crashed it wouldn't surprise me if they found a piece of plastic. So fake or not, not impossible.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  105. If it was true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was true, this would have been really funny. Imagine a million years from now, the only sign that life existed here might be the rubbish we left behind.

  106. If there was any news here at all ... by Grismar · · Score: 1

    ... it's that NASA doesn't appear to be working very hard to get this site taken down. Perhaps a little extra attention doesn't hurt? Even when it is a lame hoax that would be caught be anyone with the slightest skills as an editor. (Hint: that's probably the actual reason why NASA doesn't care to take them down)

  107. Bad joke by neither_geek_nor_ner · · Score: 1

    on Dick Cheney!!!

  108. Mars! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your plastic planet that's fun to land on!

  109. Tumbling down the rabbit hole by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    I bet you suckers bought the story about NASA discovering ice on Mercury too?

  110. Malicious site by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1, Troll

    Posting under top comment for exposure;

    My site's proxy has this domain marked as malicious. Don't visit the link.

    Editors; You're succeeding in your efforst to push me over to news.ycombinator.com. I hope your new corporate overlords are happy with their stillborn purchase.

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Malicious site by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 0

      What the fuck did you do to my link? HTTP is implied, FFS/

      http://news.ycombinator.com/

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  111. Please remove this from the frontpage. by Barryke · · Score: 1

    Please remove this from the frontpage. Its just stupid to have me read this before telling me its an obvious hoax. I am surprised however that the site isn't down yet.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  112. Complete BS - Bogus site by martypantsROK · · Score: 1

    IS this site referenced even from NASA's JPL? I don't think so. It's got a friggin' hostgator.com DNS. NASA doesn't use hostgator, do they? You've all been duped

  113. Good thing its a hoax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    US was gearing up to invade.

    Would have been quite a boost for manned spaceflight however.

  114. oil on the Red Planet by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    And suddenly NASA's budget increased by a factor of ten.

  115. Plastic on Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not fooled but dissapointed. Over the past year(s) your digital rag has gotten worse by degrees. We started getting political opinions and now your trying to be the Onion, which should probably sue you! Goodbye, it used to be a good read!

  116. Re:Score:5? Venus is not Mercury by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    The ice was found on Mercury.

    Wait, I'm confused now. What does Queen have to do with freakin NASA?

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  117. Real Announcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there supposed to be a "earth-shaking" announcement coming soon from this NASA with regards to something they found?

  118. 3d printing by morgauxo · · Score: 1

    And here researchers have been focusing on 3d-printing from moon rock. I guess Mars was better suited for it afterall!

  119. I know... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    Further materials analysis showed it to be a piece of the wrapper of a Mars chocolate bar, therefore proving that intelligent life exists on the red planet.

  120. waste of time and money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I sincerely hope that who ever was behind this hoax gets fired immediately for having damaged the reputation of JPL and wasted the time of all the readers of this TRIPE. The author is a jerk. JPL should act imediately. I am absolutely certain that the author(s) job description did not mention 'perfect for an aspiring comedian'.

    1. Re:waste of time and money by AC-x · · Score: 1

      Ahem, you do realise the site obviously has nothing to do with Nasa, right?

  121. Last day or two.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...are even worse than usual regarding stories/headlines/summaries; surely there are some Slashdot regulars that can be taken on, to give some better quality control on the stories.

  122. NASA & The Graduate: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr. McGuire: I just want to say one word to you. Just one word.
    Benjamin: Yes, sir.
    Mr. McGuire: Are you listening?
    Benjamin: Yes, I am.
    Mr. McGuire: Plastics.
    Benjamin: Exactly how do you mean? ... What did we expect?

  123. really!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it takes a person more than 1 second to conclude that the image is bogus, it's probably time for another visit to the eye doctor.

    Seriously, though, I think it is far better use of resources to focus on locating the girl lost on Mars and running around flashing the Martians.

  124. There's been another amazing discovery! by AC-x · · Score: 1

    Did you know that the word "gullible" is the most commonly used word that's not in the dictionary?

    (Seriously who posted this article??)

  125. Put it at the top, idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do I have to read an entire article just to find at the bottom... "update: Yes, it's a hoax". Can you please put that at the top next time?

  126. Check this out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.theverge.com/2012/11/29/3707122/nasa-mars-rover-curiosity-press-conference-no-organics

  127. Re:Score:5? Venus is not Mercury by kmoser · · Score: 1

    It vaporized off the surface of the Sun and solar winds carried it to Mercury where it condensed.

  128. More puzzling data by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 1

    More puzzling still is not just what appears to be letters on the sample, but the fact that they indicate "cool ranch", a flavor of Doritos that has been depricated for over a year now. The creation museum has a crack team of acolytes studying this amazing discovery now.

                    -Charlie

  129. D'oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought we were going to get "Drill baby drill" chants again...

  130. Substance found on Uranus by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They sent a probe to Uranus and found a brownish looking substance which looked suspiciously like fecal matter leading scientists to believe there may be organic life forms living there...

  131. Biogenic vs Abiogenic Petroleum Theories by parodigm_shifter · · Score: 1

    This statement " Even more interesting is that oil or petrochemicals used to create this type of plastic are only known to come from ancient fossilized organic materials, such as zooplankton and algae, which geochemical processes convert into oil pointing to the earthshaking evidence that there was once life on mars." is a bit behind the times. Research in recent times shows that petrochemicals can be generated from crystalline hydrocarbon compounds found in a variety of commonly found subterranean igneous formations. There are in fact people who explore for oil based on this theory of abiotic petroleum generation in place of the old theories that crude oil was only created from organic sources.

  132. Re:Score:5? Venus is not Mercury by P+Nitram · · Score: 1

    The moderator are really funny they rate this one informative and not funny. I feel like I switch in a parallel universe just by reading these comments...

  133. Re:Never mind the editors by business_kid · · Score: 1

    I enjoyed that item about plastic on Mars. The Editors did their job with the line " Update: Yes, it's a hoax." I wonder did the Nasa hypotheses include our space junk somehow crash landing on Mars. It won't be long before we'll have to go space filling instead of land filling with our junk anyhow if we keep the turning earth's resources into junk,

  134. Troll Alert by Mephesh · · Score: 1

    I repeat, Troll Alert

  135. NASA hoax: They were warned! by Stentoran · · Score: 1

    NASA and the European Space Agency (ESA) have both fixed security flaws that enabled a new hacking group to recently breach their servers. The hackers, calling themselves "The Unknowns," told SecurityNewsDaily the space agencies' quick action validates their ethical exploits. "We don't want revolutions, we don't want chaos, we just want to protect the people out there. Websites are not secured, people are not secured, computers are not secured, nothing is...We're here to help and we're asking nothing in exchange." http://www.technewsdaily.com/7754-nasa-confirms-hack-unknowns.html

    --
    Stentoran - He who is heard