Slashdot Mirror


Python Trademark Filer Ignorant of Python?

WebMink writes "Is it possible that the CEO of the company that's trying to file a trademark on 'Python' was unaware of Python's importance as a programming technology? That's what he claims — despite running a hosting company that's trying to break into cloud computing, where Python is used extensively. Still, he also regards the Python Software Foundation as a hostile American company and thinks that getting attention from half the world's geeks is a DDoS. From the article: '[The CEO, Tim Poultney,] confirmed that he'd not involved any technical staff in the decisions he'd made about the Python product brand, and told me he regretted that as it would probably have helped him understand the likely reaction to his trademark challenge. ... He said he now understood how offended the global developer community are and told me there was obviously only one outcome that was now possible.'"

178 of 261 comments (clear)

  1. No, that is not possible by voxra · · Score: 1

    nft

    1. Re:No, that is not possible by number11 · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's what happens when you let the suits run the companies.

    2. Re:No, that is not possible by dbIII · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's what happens when the suits are a clueless new nobility chosen due to who they are related to instead of some proven ability to run a large organisation.

    3. Re:No, that is not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No...no...the parent is absolutely correct. Suits are only interested in the bottom line, not the goodwill of the costumers, nor any one else.

    4. Re:No, that is not possible by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Costumers are a pretty difficult to please group in general, it's not really that much of a reach.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    5. Re:No, that is not possible by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm not so sure about this. If you were running a corporation and only cared about the bottom line, the last thing you'd do is choose a high-risk action like getting into a trademark fight that you're not likely to win because you're trying to steal a trademark from an organization that's been using that same name for a long time and is in wide global usage by an extremely large number of people (developers), and which name is extremely well-known in the It industry. A true smart sociopath would not do such a thing. Only a clueless moron (possibly still a sociopath, but not a smart one), probably one who got his job solely because of his frat-buddy connections, would do something this dumb.

    6. Re:No, that is not possible by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Does that make it a noobility?

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    7. Re:No, that is not possible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If I were running this company, and all I cared about was the bottom line, I'd probably try to find a cheap way to market my cloud computing business to tech-savvy individuals.... Oh wait.

      If this guy didn't do this on purpose I'd be very surprised.

      1) Pick a name for your business that is a well known name of a product your user base uses (or is at least familiar with).
      2) Try to copyright said name. Post ensuing controversy on /.
      3) Feign ignorance and change name to something else that has been worked up in the meantime.
      4) Get very large net income (aka PROFIT!)

    8. Re:No, that is not possible by coastwalker · · Score: 2

      My company has recently suffered a marketing takeover, we are well on our way to doing stupid things. Its a disgrace.

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    9. Re:No, that is not possible by Redmancometh · · Score: 1

      They don't exist to serve "customers" they exist to servr shareholders.

    10. Re:No, that is not possible by Genda · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they used to serve shareholders, now they serve themselves and if they have to fabricate information to justify their big fat bonuses, they will spin doctor a warthog's rectum into a silk clutch and a lovely pair of ear rings to do so. All you have to do is look at the long line of investors who've had their collective financial asses handed to them over the last 5 years while CEOs continue to samba all the way to the bank. I think nowadays, a Fortune 100 CEO would have to actually wear a Lady Gaga style meat suit made of skinned live babies, to even raise an eyebrow.

    11. Re:No, that is not possible by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

      they exist to servr shareholders.

      No, they sharehold their servers.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    12. Re:No, that is not possible by FauxReal · · Score: 1

      No...no...the parent is absolutely correct. Suits are only interested in the bottom line, not the goodwill of the costumers, nor any one else.

      Yeah, I'm pretty sure filing this trademark was a waste of assets.I don't even think "any publicity is good publicity" works in this instance. These guys were clueless morons with no business sense.

    13. Re:No, that is not possible by citizenr · · Score: 1

      What suits? and what company? this dude is a one man virtual hosting (rented from third party) band.

      --
      Who logs in to gdm? Not I, said the duck.
    14. Re:No, that is not possible by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      Everything knows this man is starting a cloud business... Good.

      Everything knows this man is absolutely out of touch with the IT world.. Bad

    15. Re:No, that is not possible by mitzoe · · Score: 1

      Even Ballmer wouldn't do this, AMIRITE?

    16. Re:No, that is not possible by Meski · · Score: 1

      And I was wondering what Darl McBride was doing these days.

    17. Re:No, that is not possible by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I think hiring CEOs based on "years of experience" is part of the problem, as it create a paradox.

    18. Re:No, that is not possible by RockDoctor · · Score: 1
      If you're good enough, leave.

      If you're not good enough to leave ... I'm sure youll get used to the stabbing pain in your bum.

      It's called a meritocracy.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Resignation? by similar_name · · Score: 2

    ... He said he now understood how offended the global developer community are and told me there was obviously only one outcome that was now possible.'"

    Resignation?

    1. Re:Resignation? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      seppuku

    2. Re:Resignation? by mysidia · · Score: 5, Funny

      Renaming his company to some unique name that others couldn't possibly have thought of, like oh... Apache, or Turbo Gears

    3. Re:Resignation? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 5, Funny

      Clearly it would be a big foot coming down from the sky to flatten him.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    4. Re:Resignation? by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      Snakes on a Plane!

      They could be Pythons....

    5. Re:Resignation? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Clearly it would be a big foot coming down from the sky to flatten him.

      Or a winged python?

    6. Re:Resignation? by arth1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was thinking that he could shorten Pobox Hosting Provider to PHP.

      It's not like he hasn't used abbreviations before - the company was formerly known as PIS.

    7. Re:Resignation? by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 5, Funny

      ... He said he now understood how offended the global developer community are and told me there was obviously only one outcome that was now possible.'"

      Resignation?

      Sue EVERYONE, with the inevitable end result of infinite monies forever. Clearly.

      who let the CEO of SCO on here.

      --
      ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
    8. Re:Resignation? by Arkham · · Score: 1

      seppuku

      How can this comment not get modded up? I actually laughed.

      --
      - Vincit qui patitur.
    9. Re:Resignation? by ankhank · · Score: 2

      I heard the Internet is a series of tubes traversed by snakes carrying messages.

    10. Re:Resignation? by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      iApple?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    11. Re:Resignation? by zeugma-amp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd like to point out that there is another Pobox out there, which is a US company (pobox.com), that is apparently not affiliated with this British "Pobox" company.

      From their blog:

      =snip=

      We support @ThePSF in their fight for Python trademarks in the EU. @pobox is *not* http://pobox.co.uk. Learn more: http://pyfound.blogspot.nl/2013/02/python-trademark-at-risk-in-europe-we.htmlâ¦

      =end snip=

      I'm not affiliated with either company. I've used pobox.com for email forwarding for about 17 years though, which is one thing that made me investigate this, as the UK company's claim of having used 'python' for 17 years seemed to me like about how long the US company had been around.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    12. Re:Resignation? by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 2

      But couldn't those avian carriers carry tubes with snakes? Should be possible if they can carry a coconut...

      --
      Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    13. Re:Resignation? by lxs · · Score: 1

      They could easily resolve the issue by renaming to poobox.co.uk.

    14. Re:Resignation? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are very few avian carriers that can safely transport snakes. The only one I'm aware of is the sea eagle. Probably other eagles too, but eagles are large beasts indeed, and an eagle-based internet would be very hungry and expensive. Although it would give us a way to get rid of our overstocks of horsemeat....

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    15. Re:Resignation? by Sabathius · · Score: 1

      Although it would give us a way to get rid of our overstocks of horsemeat....

      Don't say that in front of Burger King.

    16. Re:Resignation? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Wait, why again would this lead to him filling in numbers to complete a magic square?

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    17. Re:Resignation? by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      You mean African or European... snakes?

      But then, a coconut is round, while a snake is not. Maybe two avian carriers can load a snake between the two of them after all.

    18. Re:Resignation? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      ... He said he now understood how offended the global developer community are and told me there was obviously only one outcome that was now possible.'"

      Resignation?

      Promotion. With a very healthy pay rise.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  3. Company lacks credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As a young wannabe programmer, I feel that this company has to be pretty clueless to be in the computing business and not know about one of the most popular programming languages today. The fact that it uses the largely meaningless and sensationalistic "cloud computing" buzzword also harms its credibility.

    1. Re:Company lacks credibility by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The fact that it uses the largely meaningless and sensationalistic "cloud computing" buzzword also harms its credibility.

      That's a hard case to make nowadays, whether we like it or not. Not having heard of Python is ridiculous though.

    2. Re:Company lacks credibility by cbhacking · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Much though I despise the term, "cloud computing" is not meaningless or even sensationalistic, and there are some very big companies who have built their success on cloud computing. It is, perhaps, over-hyped and watered down, and it's undeniably a buzzword. It's also pretty misunderstood, as you yourself are evidence of (the basic concept is simply "hosted computing services"). However, to say you think a company lacks credibility because they speak of cloud computing is, frankly, idiotic.

      The first part of your post makes sense, though. I could understand a company that wasn't deeply involved with computer software might not be aware of a programming language, even a common one, although you'd think they might make at least a trivial web search. However, for a software-focused company to be unaware of Python's importance is, frankly, unbelievable. This guy is just trying to pull whatever damage control he can.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    3. Re:Company lacks credibility by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Never knock cloud computing. Whilst I am thinking through strategies to crack problems I will often stare at the clouds out my window. This is neither meaningless nor sensationalist.

      The nice thing about cloud computing is you can do it anywhere where you have a clear view of the sky. It can sometimes work with just photographs of the sky.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    4. Re:Company lacks credibility by arth1 · · Score: 1

      The nice thing about cloud computing is you can do it anywhere where you have a clear view of the sky.

      Not necessarily. Some places, you won't see a cloud at all for most of the year. Death Valley and Bouvet Island being two examples. Beijing being another.

    5. Re:Company lacks credibility by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Ironically, you misdescribed cloud computing. It's pay as you go hosted clustered computing services. Each of these things has been around and many combinations of these things have been tried before, and really most scientific computing had become like this before anyone was calling it cloud computing.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Company lacks credibility by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Even in LA it is sometimes hard to see the clouds with all the smog in the way.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    7. Re:Company lacks credibility by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      If you can't see the clouds, try for the crowds.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Company lacks credibility by void* · · Score: 1

      Do you have a source for that? My understanding is that Death Valley gets clouds, they just don't get a lot of rain because the clouds have already dumped most of their moisture on the Sierra Nevada.

      Even if the claim is true, it just means someone needs to come up with an algorithm for ensuring that cloud-bits set to 0 end up over death valley at the appropriate times.

      --


      Code or be coded.
    9. Re:Company lacks credibility by Fnkmaster · · Score: 1

      Cloud computing definitely doesn't have to be pay-as-you-go. The pay-as-you-go hosted computing services are certainly banner examples of "cloud computing" but they are by no means the only thing that can be accurately described as "cloud computing".

    10. Re:Company lacks credibility by Jesus_666 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I work for a company deeply involved with software (us being a web design/hosting company) but that doesn't mean that my boss has any idea of how software or the internet works. He has another (non-tech) company and at some point decided that instead of paying someone to build him a website he'd hire a couple techies and open a web design company, leaving the implementation to us while making all the business decisions.

      Yes, that leads to a things like deciding that mobile websites are "a big new thing" (which happened last week) and not understanding responsive design despite us explaining it to him several times. At this point we're implementing responsive design and will be selling it as if it was a separate mobile website (complete with a second contract and everything) because that's easier than convincing the boss that it's just a bit of CSS that we can include and exclude at our convenience. The second contract was a business decision made without any input from the developers and we just have to make it happen.

      I'm already looking forward to someone canceling their regular contract but wanting to keep their "mobile website". Bonus points if they expect their "mobile website" to remain at the same domain as their new, externally-hosted website. But hey, mobile websites are the future.

      So yeah, cluelessness in your field of business is very much possible and is not antithetical to success.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    11. Re:Company lacks credibility by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      Cloud computing is a term that encompasses several technologies none of which are particularly new, and has some very fuzzy edges - a perfect Buzzword

      It is largely meaningless and very poorly defined, in that any company doing anything on a network could quite reasonably define it a a cloud computing system

      A company that sells itself using the term "Cloud" is just using a buzzword and it does not mean anything, unless they are clearly clueless (which they do appear to be in this case)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    12. Re:Company lacks credibility by dkf · · Score: 1

      [Cloud computing is] pay as you go hosted clustered computing services.

      With virtualization and a working business model. The virtualization is a critical part of what distinguishes cloud computing from what went immediately before, and the business model (essentially based on "very short term rents" though there's more to it than that; the virtualization isn't just at one level and that makes things much more complex) is what makes it more successful. The immediate predecessors were grid computing (which was largely a bust because of the lack of a good business model) and hosted computing (which was successful, but rather slow to spin up and down — order of months, not minutes — and so didn't challenge self-hosting in the same way).

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    13. Re:Company lacks credibility by dkf · · Score: 1

      Some places, you won't see a cloud at all for most of the year.

      I'll trade. Round here, we get clouds most of the year and way too little sunshine. A bit more non-cloud would be great...

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    14. Re:Company lacks credibility by sjames · · Score: 1

      The problem is that it has SO many meanings that nearly any computing that won't work right if you unplug the ethernet cable falls under 'cloud computing'. Is it server rental? Yes. Client-server? Yes. Software rental? yes. An Ajax application? Yes.

    15. Re:Company lacks credibility by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      I find it interesting that you claim cloud computing is nisunderstood, but didn't take the opportunity to set the record straight on what cloud computing truly is and why it its bad reputation should be undeserved.

      You may well be deluding yourself thinking it is something more than what it actually is.

    16. Re:Company lacks credibility by edcalaban · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I'm not surprised. We had a customer complain about having to buy an app on Android and iOS - said complaint somehow went straight to a VP. It trickled down through a couple layers of management before they came to us (the mobile app team) where we could explain that no, there's nothing we can do, it's no different from buying Office on a Mac and a PC.

      The point being, these VPs are very knowledgeable, but their knowledge is a different domain (business, hardware, etc, not software). It's likely the same here - the people who decided on the brand name don't actually have much domain knowledge of software.

    17. Re:Company lacks credibility by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "The virtualization is a critical part of what distinguishes cloud computing from what went immediately before"

      No it isn't. There are plenty of hosting companies that give you the option of paying for have a real machine to yourself - ie run on real hardware rather than a VM.

    18. Re:Company lacks credibility by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      >There are plenty of hosting companies that give you the option of paying for have a real machine to yoursel

      Yes, but that is not 'cloud' computing.

      A cloud and spring up quickly then vaporize quickly. If I need to serve 10 million extra customers in 2 days for a big sale I can spin up how ever many extra VM instances in the 'cloud' very quickly. If I need bare metal it will take much longer to get operating systems up and running on them, and I'll it's likely that I need to have a much longer lead time in with the hosting provider to get all the machines I need. Just like the previous poster said.

      If you need fixed (baseline) capacity for long periods of time, run on bare metal (or run a VM on your bare metal for hardware abstraction and snapshotting). If you need dynamic capacity, use whatever cloud provider is fast and cheap to fill the gaps.

      tl;dr: Yes it is.

    19. Re:Company lacks credibility by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      Yes, it has been quite bastardized.

      Is it server rental, well it shouldn't be, cloud should be instance rental, the underlying server being whatever performance metric you need for your app, but the actual hardware is abstracted.

      I think 'Hive computing' would be a better name for it. In a hive you don't care which bee gets the work done as long as the work gets done quickly. If one bee dies, there is another bee to replace it.

    20. Re:Company lacks credibility by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Asking for a source is not needed when Google can do the job quite quickly. More than half a dozen places in the US southwest have over 80% sunshine from sunrise to sunset, and a good portion of those are cloudless days.
      http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/08/01/080111-news-yuma-1-5/

      As for Bouvet Island (top level domain .bi), it does technically have clouds - but the temperature year-round is just above freezing, so you can't see the clouds for high fog. All you see is grey. And due to this, there are no satellite pictures actually showing the interior of the island. http://eosweb.larc.nasa.gov/HPDOCS/misr/misr_html/bouvet_island.html
      Only a couple of lucky photos taken by plane on rare cloud/fog-less moments.

      As for Beijing, surely no source is needed for the problems they've been having lately with smog?

    21. Re:Company lacks credibility by tqk · · Score: 1

      Cloud computing is a buzz term to a good extent that will get tacked on to everything because it is hip and current, and at the same time it is a real concept applicable to some things.

      ... which is a re-hash of something used forty or fifty years ago when computers were surrounded by glass walls and white-coated priests. Peddle your snakeoil elsewhere.

      --
      "Tongue tied and twisted, just an Earth bound misfit ..." -- Pink Floyd.
    22. Re:Company lacks credibility by sjames · · Score: 1

      Hive was already used for a Beowulf cluster since it implies that all of the bees are working as a unit for a common goal.

    23. Re:Company lacks credibility by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I don't thinkn you quite understand what cloud computing is - its simply the latest marketing buzzword for online storage and execution. Which has been around for decades.

  4. Hanlon's razor by MCROnline · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.

    1. Re:Hanlon's razor by __aasmho4525 · · Score: 1

      Came here to say *exactly* this, good sir or madam!

    2. Re:Hanlon's razor by ananthap · · Score: 1
      It's not stupidity but a business move. If you read the original COMPUTERWORLD article, you will see that the PSF which he claims is a big US corporation, has just a one man office.

      The "big American corporation" claim bears investigation too. While POBox Hosting Ltd is a small business, the Python Software Foundation -- although representing the interests of millions of developers worldwide -- is even smaller. Chairman Van Lindberg told me "the PSF is a very small nonprofit. We have one full-time staff administrator and a part-time accountant. All the rest of us are unpaid - we have regular jobs that we do each day and we donate our time to the PSF." He also exaggerates his own position.

      That "trading for 17 years" claim deserved investigation, so I took a look on Archive.org. His company bought the python.co.uk domain in 1997, and did offer "Python Internet Services" in 1997 and again briefly in 2004 (trading as "CheapNet" in between). After 2004, the domain just redirected to Pobox.co.uk (although Tim told me customers could request a "@python.co.uk" e-mail address). So while the company may once have had products with the name, their new cloud service, launched at the start of 2012, seems to have been a new departure. OK

  5. One outcome possible? by mark-t · · Score: 4, Funny

    The article seems to end on a cliffhanger. What outcome is the article writer referring to? There are many that spring to mind.

    1. Re:One outcome possible? by hawguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      The article seems to end on a cliffhanger. What outcome is the article writer referring to? There are many that spring to mind.

      Obviously the Python Software Foundation should rename the language after a lesser known snake. Maybe Mamusi or Atractaspis.

    2. Re:One outcome possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      He said he now understood how offended the global developer community are and told me there was obviously only one outcome that was now possible. He then removed a automatic pistol which had been concealed beneath his desk, held it under his chin and stared into oblivion. "Tell my children I love them... and that I am sorry", he muttered before squeezing the trigger.

      Well maybe not... it just seemed such a dramatic thing to say.

    3. Re:One outcome possible? by dgatwood · · Score: 1, Funny

      Obligatory xkcd.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    4. Re:One outcome possible? by chartreuse · · Score: 1

      If only I had mod points. Thanks for the laugh.

    5. Re: One outcome possible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      They could name it after an asp.

    6. Re:One outcome possible? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I've occasionally thought about forking Python just to call it Boomslang...

    7. Re:One outcome possible? by Jane_Dozey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Adder would be a more appropriate substitution, surely.

      --
      Silly rabbit
    8. Re:One outcome possible? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      If only they were named after a snake... renaming it to Bean may be more appropriate. Just no idea what to do with all the spam and eggs references in the documentation, in such a situation.

    9. Re:One outcome possible? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      They should rename it to something actually related to the current name, like Monty.

    10. Re:One outcome possible? by knuthin · · Score: 1

      Brian.

      --
      Some apps are WYSIWYG. Some others are WYSIWTF.
    11. Re: One outcome possible? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      They could name it after an asp.

      Or a viper.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    12. Re:One outcome possible? by Quirkz · · Score: 2

      They could call it Black Adder, which involves both a snake and a British comedy. Problem solved!

    13. Re:One outcome possible? by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      Or maybe they could call it Cleese...

  6. Crystal Clear example.. by zzottt · · Score: 1

    This is a crystal clear example of CEO arrogance

  7. How to not make a high-profile company by LesFerg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If I was registering a new company, the last thing I would want to give my company or servers etc is a name that already pulls up millions of pages in a simple web search.
    It just sounds like somebody was clueless and doesn't even know how people find services on the internet these days.

    --
    If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    1. Re:How to not make a high-profile company by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      with enough adwords dollars, he could still dominate that keyword.

    2. Re:How to not make a high-profile company by Nyder · · Score: 2

      If I was registering a new company, the last thing I would want to give my company or servers etc is a name that already pulls up millions of pages in a simple web search.
      It just sounds like somebody was clueless and doesn't even know how people find services on the internet these days.

      Clueless management? Clueless CEO? Tell me it isn't so!

      --
      Be seeing you...
    3. Re:How to not make a high-profile company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well it looks like he gained quite a bit of publicity by doing so. So not sure if it's a bad strategy.

    4. Re:How to not make a high-profile company by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      step 1 - use name that is popular
      step 2 - make a public outcry claiming stupidity and asking forgiveness
      step 3 - change company name, profit!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    5. Re:How to not make a high-profile company by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Step 3 is a little vague. How about:
      step 3.0 - announce that you are changing the name
      step 3.1 - sell the company
      step 3.2 - profit
      step 3.3 - new owner deals with fallout.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:How to not make a high-profile company by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Only you can kill SEO with fire.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  8. do it by ewertz · · Score: 4, Funny

    Suicide would be the only honorable thing to do at this point. By reptilian strangulation would be appropriate.

    1. Re:do it by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      What do reptiles have to do with Python?

    2. Re:do it by ewertz · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected -- death by Monty Python marathon.

    3. Re:do it by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      Bring out... THE JOKE.

    4. Re:do it by MadKeithV · · Score: 1

      It's only a model, and just a fleshwound. Now, where did you get those coconuts?

    5. Re:do it by BeCre8iv · · Score: 1

      Mein schalnge hast kein naze...

      --
      This perpetual motion machine Lisa made is a joke, it just keeps getting faster and faster. - Homer
  9. Re:Seriously? by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    No kidding. EVERYONE who's ANYONE knows the Cloud run on Ruby.

  10. The Real WTF by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Insightful

    [The CEO, Tim Poultney,] confirmed that he'd not involved any technical staff in the decisions he'd made about the Python product brand

    Seriously? I know a lot of CEOs have more branding experience than many developers but making single-minded decisions about your company's future, with no input from those who are likely to be affected most by those decisions, does not sound like the thinking of a leader.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:The Real WTF by mysidia · · Score: 2

      The more people involved; the greater the cost of making the decision. Branding is mostly a marketing thing, so they probably involved the marketing department, but not engineering.

      What legitimate reason would there be to go ask Engineers to approve a marketing decision, wasting their time and energy? The CEO probably didn't think of one, so he didn't ask... it probably would have been fine, if the proper research had been done -- you don't need an engineer to identify Python as a bad name, you need maybe 15 minutes with Google:)

    2. Re:The Real WTF by fermion · · Score: 1
      If a CEO cannot, does not, Google the name of the company, this is a severe lack of due diligence. I do not see how they got funding without looking at branding and the indirect competition the branding might cause.

      Look at the Apple Store situation. Think about SEO and how difficult it is going to be to get a the top of a page.The security company that is 30 years old isn't on the top of the page in my browser. And the snake is on the second page. Again, who is going to invest with SEO challenges like that?

      Unless they planned to put forth the cash to decimate the indirect competition.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    3. Re:The Real WTF by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      IT staff are generally not affected by the branding one way or the other and it would be an incredibly rare occurrence for them to ever be involved. Even in this instance the IT staff are not affected by the branding, they just would have been able to advise on how bad a branding choice it was.

    4. Re:The Real WTF by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Seriously? I know a lot of CEOs have more branding experience than many developers but making single-minded decisions about your company's future, with no input from those who are likely to be affected most by those decisions, does not sound like the thinking of a leader.

      Single mindedness may be a stretch.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    5. Re:The Real WTF by 24-bit+Voxel · · Score: 1

      Surely they had lawyers pouring over it... didn't *they* notice?

    6. Re:The Real WTF by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      ... because the engineering department would have brought up such a potential issue, before the CEO made himself and his company look like a bunch of fools?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    7. Re:The Real WTF by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Fair point, but would it really be that hard for them to have asked?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:The Real WTF by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Is that the new name for the company? :-)

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:The Real WTF by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      There is a lot of talk about a tech company not knowing about Python. I'll give the guy a benefit of a doubt, he is the CEO and probably more of a salesman, he lets his engineers managed the details... BUT if he is a tech company, trying to brand a tech product, surely he would consult some technical staff?

  11. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Python may not be at the center of the universe, but if your company sells Cloud computing products, it is pretty damn close.

    It is the equivalent of knowing how to speak English but being unaware that there is a geographic area called England.

  12. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    But this isn't 95% of the population, it's a company trying to break into cloud computing. I realize you don't have to be an area expert to be CEO, but I'd expect them to have googled what you're trying to sell once or twice.

  13. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude, you're an idiot.

    If you google the word "python" THE TOP FOUR HITS ARE ALL ABOUT THE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE. After that, we have one Wikipedia article on the snake, and then FOUR MORE ABOUT THE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE.

    You're telling me you wouldn't even google the fucking name of a trademark you're going to use just to see what else comes up?!!?

    When eight of the top nine results for a one-word search of your proposed trademark ALL refer to ONE thing ... maybe you should look into it.

  14. Next, Perl ? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Anyone preparing to start a new company and name it "Perl" ?

    --
    Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    1. Re:Next, Perl ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Anyone preparing to start a new company and name it "Perl" ?

      Perl can do anything Python can do!

    2. Re:Next, Perl ? by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Here, I've got some python code for it to execute...

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Next, Perl ? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      Wake me up when Python has something even closely related to Moose.

      Python has not only the Majestic Moose, but also the Wonder Llama.
      I'm speaking about the Monty one, of course.

      SCNR

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    4. Re:Next, Perl ? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Does perl have a soul?

    5. Re:Next, Perl ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A moose bit my sister once.

    6. Re:Next, Perl ? by mfnickster · · Score: 2

      Mynd you, møøse bites kan be pretty nasti...

      --
      "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
    7. Re:Next, Perl ? by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 2

      YEAH, But Perl can do it 500 different ways and all of them are pretty much unreadable.

    8. Re:Next, Perl ? by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Anyone preparing to start a new company and name it "Perl" ?

      Perl can do anything Python can do!

      Is that to crash without posting an error message?

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
  15. Re:only one outcome that was now possible. by gmuslera · · Score: 4, Funny

    If didn't know about python, then the company wasn't about computers anyway, probably they assumed that computers were just fancy furniture.

  16. Re:Seriously? by nebulus4 · · Score: 1

    If you are part of IT world and never heard of Python, then God help your company. No, seriously.

    --
    "It would be wrong to refuse to face the fact that everything is fundamentally sick and sad."
  17. There's only one outcome that is now possible by steveha · · Score: 4, Funny

    CEO, Tim Poultney: All right, we'll call it a draw.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zKhEw7nD9C4

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  18. Re:Seriously? by mark-t · · Score: 1

    Google Search had only just launched in September 1997, and this guy initially started using the term as far back as that.

    Of course, Python existed as a programming language for an additional 6 years before that, so really, this is just about somebody not doing a little bit of homework.

  19. POBox should just use some other kind of snake by __aawkdb2598 · · Score: 1

    My $0.02 : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asp_(reptile) What could possibly go wrong?

  20. An attorney is ignorant by Skapare · · Score: 1

    An attorney is ignorant. No news here. Move along.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  21. More evidence that CEOs aren't human... by runeghost · · Score: 1

    and instead should be legally and scientifically classified as some sort of vermin.

    1. Re:More evidence that CEOs aren't human... by codegen · · Score: 1

      and instead should be legally and scientifically classified as some sort of vermin.

      Which of course are food for pythons!!

      --
      Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
  22. Python compiler by White+Flame · · Score: 2

    The Python compiler is the native code compiler used in (likely) the most popular Common Lisp implementation on the planet, SBCL. It was originally part of CMUCL, which SBCL initially forked from, and predated "that other scripting language".

    It's not that hard to coexist with conflicting names, if you're not an idiot. Obviously, that's not the case with this CEO, and Tim Poultney's name will be linked to this asinine attempt at overreach for the foreseeable future.

    1. Re:Python compiler by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      It is hard to co-exist when you're dealing with registered trademarks. If you don't actively defend it, you lose it.

    2. Re:Python compiler by White+Flame · · Score: 1

      Right, but the problem was that Poultney was trying to register it for *everything* computing related, not just for hosting services & products. Had he been more decent in what field his trademark was covered for, there wouldn't have been a problem.

  23. Re:Seriously? by cbhacking · · Score: 1

    There were search engines before Google. Lycos was even pretty decent by pre-Google standards; other people had other preferences.

    No, I don't know how well-known Python (the language) was back then, and I don't know whether ordinary people would have thought "I should do a web search on that" in those days, but I'm pretty sure the information would have been available. Hell, when was python.org registered? The copyright notice at the bottom begins with 1990.

    --
    There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  24. More realistically, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Folly is the cloak of knavery

  25. Not 95% of hosting companies by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If a person who runs a hosting company is not even familiar with a major programming language that is widely used for web development, his credibility is seriously questionable. It is the equivalent of a car dealership whose owner has never heard of Ferrari.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by Psychotria · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Nah it's more like the owner of a car dealership who has never heard of a camshaft.

    2. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Not even that. The vast majority of cars these days have camshafts. The vast majority of websites aren't built using Python.

    3. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      Depends on the company. Look at Louis Vincent Gerstner, Jr. and IBM. He was not a technology guy. He was a management guy having come from RJR Nabisco. Some may loathe what he did to parts of IBM as geeks, but IBM is still around and going strong. Same can't be said for Sun, SGI, DEC, and other major hardware competitors of that era. I'm getting to the age where my technical skills are fading in the marketplace but my ability to go between the geeks in development and non-technical Sr. management types has become ever more valuable. I have 20+ years of industry experience now on the tech side covering mostly systems admin, but also some programming, plus I have a degrees in business and law. (Not a practicing attorney though I've got the JD, but was brought into a start up right after law school that eventually was sold and I never sat for the bar exam. Can't say it's hurt me that much). What I've found is that a successful technology companies needs both the business side and tech side that can work together. Thing is, the most successful CEO I worked for came from the printing industry and was running a "Technology" company. He didn't understand how the technical things worked, didn't want to know, other than what resources were needed to make it work. What he did understand was things like cash flow management, budgeting, and how marketing vs sales worked. As COO the technical side of the house was left to me and the programmers and technical support staff. And it worked out very well.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    4. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Fine. Carburetor.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    5. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, an american. Here in the civilized world 60% of all new cars run on diesel. They even win legendary automobile races, go figure...

    6. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      Again...

    7. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Again what?

      How many cars these days have carburetors? Hint: if it has fuel injection, it doesn't.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    8. Re:Not 95% of hosting companies by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

      most jap imports from the 80's and earlier...
      There was a time where every (petrol-powered) car had one. There was never a time where most thing used Python.

  26. Re:Seriously? by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 4, Funny

    It is the equivalent of knowing how to speak English but being unaware that there is a geographic area called England.

    So, a not-so-insignificant portion of America?

  27. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Altavista - die heretic!

  28. Re:RUpy by devleopard · · Score: 1

    How about a Ruby implementation written in Python? (Topaz)

    http://topaz.readthedocs.org/en/latest/blog/announcing-topaz/

    --
    The best thing about a boolean is even if you are wrong, you are only off by a bit.
  29. Re:Anyone remember the theos-software.com debacle? by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

    Not every /. reader knew / knows / was-interested / cared about OpenBSD back then but the back story is quite interesting:

    http://www.theos.com/dispute.html

  30. Re:Seriously? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    So, a not-so-insignificant portion of America?

    I think virtually Americans know there is a geographic area called England, but I also think many of them would be hard-pressed to point to it on a map with labels. We learn to mock England in elementary school, or I did anyway.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  31. Re:Seriously? by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

    Right into the hacker's botnet.

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
  32. Better Yet by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    Why didn't the Python foundation just trademark first? Whats clearly happening is that the foundation is crying home to mommy because they waited on getting the trademark, well to bad, you lost deal with it.

    1. Re:Better Yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Except that's not how trademarks work. It isn't first to file, heck it isn't even for the company's benefit that trademark exists. It only exists for consumer protection. So that the consumer can be confident that the trademark means what they think it means. That's why it is relatively domain specific, since there's less chance of confusion.

    2. Re:Better Yet by Xtifr · · Score: 2

      Not only that, but a registered trademark only applies to the country it's registered in. To officially register your trademark world-wide, you'd need to pay 193 different registration fees in god-only-knows how many different forms of currency.

      Fortunately, there are all sorts of treaties about recognizing other countries' trademarks, and the US doesn't require registration (though it can make life easier if there's a challenge).

      Basically, though, the fact that python-the-language has been using that name for decades in the EU should make it untrademarkable by anyone else, at least for anything related to computer software. (Python brand t-shirts will remain unaffected.) It would confuse consumers.

  33. he's right by ThorGod · · Score: 1

    We do want him off the internet and it is a DDoS.

    What a piece of...

    --
    PS: I don't reply to ACs.
  34. Re:Seriously? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    If I were to register a trademark for my new company, during the process of making up a name, the first thing I'd do is to use it as search query in Google to see if anyone may be using it. Wikipedia's entry on nr. 10 is the first that's not about the programming language.

    So even if he didn't know about the programming language, it seems he hasn't done any research at all on the current use of the name, and whether there are any clashes with their intended use of the brand.

    Mind that it is no problem to have two or more companies using the same trademark, as long as they are in separate markets (either geographically or different product range - think e.g. the iPhone mobile phone brand in Brazil, and Apple Music vs. Apple Computer).

  35. Re:Seriously? by Macgrrl · · Score: 2

    Oh snap!

    England and America are two countries separated by the same language.

    possibly by Shaw

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
  36. Re:Seriously? by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    What do you think Google would have said in October 1997 (over 15 years ago, perhaps that's where the 15 years comes from?) when the company in question registered python.co.uk? Nothing probably since they didn't call themselves Google until 1998.

  37. Re:Seriously? by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

    My "cloud" is running on perl. Has been for over 12 years now. Last major change to the code was adding support to return data in JSON as well as XML a few years ago. Now get off meh lawn.

    --
    "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
  38. Re:Seriously? by ChoGGi · · Score: 1

    going by whois: Created On:27-Mar-1995 05:00:00 UTC

  39. Comment same as title? by kperson · · Score: 1

    Comment same as title?

  40. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    dude, you are an idiot. Google search results are tailored for the person doing the searching. Which is to say, the top 4 results are likely not the same for him, as it is for you.

  41. You poke the snake by hduff · · Score: 1

    Poke the snake and get bitten.

    --
    "I believe in Karma. That means I can do bad things to people all day long and I assume they deserve it." : Dogbert
  42. Re:Seriously? by LSDelirious · · Score: 3, Funny

    Reminds me of the time my boss wanted to call a new line of cleaning products "Blue Ice". He wasnt amused when I pointed out that in addition to the well known cooler packs, customers searching for us would be getting results mentioning frozen balls of piss & shit ejected from airliners, and Walter White's blue wonder meth lol

    --
    Slavery is the legal fiction that a person is property; A Corporation is the legal fiction that property is a person.
  43. Re:Seriously? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Hotbot says EXTERMINATE

    Of course, it was remarkably easy to make an unfortunate typo whilst trying to land at hotbot.com...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  44. Re:RUpy by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Only if you can shove Jython in there somehow...

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  45. American? by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'd say the fact that he thinks Python-the-language is something American is proof that he's pretty much completely unaware of it. Unless Holland was annexed by the US recently, while I wasn't looking, I think it's Dutch. :)

    1. Re:American? by StormReaver · · Score: 1

      Unless Holland was annexed by the US recently

      Does Holland have oil?

  46. Re:Comment same as title? Yes, of course. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    Comment same as title?

    Yes, of course.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  47. Re:Seriously? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    And everyone knows Ruby runs on Rails!

    Of course rails are very inflexible. You can only go in the direction the builder of the rails envisioned.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  48. New Company Names by IronClad · · Score: 2

    Slashdot should create a poll for a new company name. If they don't have enought brains to use a search engine they need all the help we can give them.

    To keep the snake motif I would suggest the following:

    DumbAsp
    RattlerBrains
    Mambasement
    Adder-all
    Krait and Barefaced

  49. Re:only one outcome that was now possible. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    His company probably already was not computers related. Being a cloud computing hosting company probably meant that he rented rooms to people wanting to calculate something about clouds in the sky. :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  50. Re:Seriously? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    If I were to register a trademark for my new company, during the process of making up a name, the first thing I'd do is to use it as search query in Google to see if anyone may be using it. Wikipedia's entry on nr. 10 is the first that's not about the programming language.

    Someone else here reported position 5 for the Wikipedia entry. This is already a strong hint that the positions you see are absolutely not indicative on what others see. And certainly not about what others would have seen 17 years ago.

    Just for the record, I get the Wikipedia entry for the snake at position 4. However that's the German language article ...

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  51. Re:RUpy by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    ... running on a JVM written in JavaScript.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  52. Re:Seriously? by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    Well yes I know Google gives different results to different people, however if I get basically exclusively Python-the-programming-language results (which surprised me - I'd expect a bit more snakes), then it's hard to imagine that someone doing even basic research on a trademark can not find this.

    Also as I understand they try to register the trademark now, after not having used it for many years. Trademarks do not come with expiry dates like patents or copyrights, however you may lose a trademark, even if registered, if you do not use it for some time (a few years is long enough to use that argument).

    Python is not even 17 years old, nor is Google. If they had been using the Python trademark for all those 17 years it'd be theirs. And in that case they should've started complaining to Python the programming language long time ago.

  53. brainf**k by nozzo · · Score: 1

    good thing he didn't try to trademark brainf**k - those guys don't mess around they go straight to the syntaxical point

  54. Re:only one outcome that was now possible. by lxs · · Score: 1

    You count IKEA as fancy furniture? You poor deprived person.

  55. Re:Is Python Gonna Bother Registering in Europe No by lattyware · · Score: 1

    I don't know about the whole of Europe, but at least in the UK, registering a trademark is just a process to help you prove you own it, by having it there as proof. You still own a trademark by establishing a brand, even if you don't register it.

    --
    -- Lattyware (www.lattyware.co.uk)
  56. This guy must be a real gem to work under by Omnifarious · · Score: 2

    The story about not knowing about Python was actually fairly believable because it correlates well with the kinds of actions the company has taken and the other things the CEO said. So now it remains, how is it that his technical staff couldn't tell him the problem?

    I mean, someone had to be told to actually put something at the domain. Someone had to make up the graphics. Someone had to publish the graphics on the site. I'm certain that some people in his staff were groaning and clutching their heads over what kind of problems this would cause them. How is it that none of them could come to him and tell him what the problem was?

    I can only conclude that he makes it impossible for his staff to question his decisions. CEOs like that are awful to work under.

  57. Re:Seriously? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    If you google the word "python" THE TOP FOUR HITS ARE ALL ABOUT THE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE. After that, we have one Wikipedia article on the snake, and then FOUR MORE ABOUT THE PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE.

    That's actually sort of telling that Google ranks the Wikipedia page for the language higher than the Wikipedia page for the animal. If you ask anyone on the street to define "python" they'll refer to the animal, but apparently the vast majority of people who use Google to search for it end up clicking on pages about the language.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  58. Re:Seriously? by steelfood · · Score: 1

    And you'll need windows the see the cloud.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  59. meatware limitations on high altitude IP transport by Medievalist · · Score: 1

    There are very few avian carriers that can safely transport snakes. The only one I'm aware of is the sea eagle.

    Packet loss from hungry eagles is unacceptable for long links. Screech owls perform notably better due to their symbiotic relationship with blind snakes, but the screech owl's low carrying capacity and nocturnal habit make them unsuitable for general purpose avian carriers, and severely restrict their application in general.

  60. Re:Seriously? by Sigma+7 · · Score: 1

    Ctrl-Shift-N or Ctrl-Shift-P to open a new private window. Google search Python, and you still get the programming language first.

    If you go with other search engines, perhaps DuckDuckGo, you still get a rapid result for the python programming language (although the first in DDG is for Monty Python.) Still a wall of context pointing to programming languages, but that's as far of a deviation you get.

  61. Re:what? like windows untrademarkable? by Xtifr · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure what you're saying. The fact that Microsoft has been using the term "Windows" for their OS should make it untrademarkable by anyone else. The fact that they have actually trademarked it doesn't affect that. (Though they hastily dropped a suit against Lindows when the trademark was challenged, just so the question of whether it's really trademarkable at all never came up in court. At least in the US.) The simple fact that they've been using the term for so long is what makes it untrademarkable by anyone else. Registration is the just the gravy that makes it easy for them to prove they've been using the term.

    That's how Linus ended up with the trademark to Linux. Someone else tried to claim it, and he demonstrated that he'd been using the term for his software for years, so the PTO re-assigned the trademark to him.

    The domain matters. Computer software would definitely be out. Anything else computer related is probably out, but I didn't want to leap too far in my claims.

  62. Re:meatware limitations on high altitude IP transp by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 1

    Screech owls often eat the blind snakes, though, resulting in high packet loss.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'