Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Dealing With an Advanced Wi-Fi Leech?

An anonymous reader writes "Recently, I had found out (through my log files) that my wireless router was subject to a Wi-Fi Protected Setup (WPS) brute force PIN attack. After looking on the Internet and discovering that there are indeed many vulnerabilities to WPS, I disabled it. After a few days, I noticed that I kept intermittently getting disconnected at around the same time every day (indicative of a WPA deauthentication handshake capture attempt). I also noticed that an evil twin has been set up in an effort to get me to connect to it. Through Wi-Fi monitoring software, I have noticed that certain MAC addresses are connected to multiple WEP and WPA2 access points in my neighborhood. I believe that I (and my neighbors) may be dealing with an advanced Wi-Fi leech. What can I do in this situation? Should I bother purchasing a directional antenna, figuring out exactly where the clients are situated, and knocking on their door? Is this something the local police can help me with?"

171 of 884 comments (clear)

  1. Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And punch him in the nose.

    1. Re:Figure out where he is located by jez9999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

    2. Re:Figure out where he is located by gnasher719 · · Score: 3, Funny

      In places like Florida, Stand Your Ground lets them legally shoot you dead for that.

      Shoot them for leeching your WiFi? I prefer the punching bit.

    3. Re:Figure out where he is located by Artraze · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is news for nerds, jock solutions like that aren't welcome here!

      Correct solution:
      Pinpoint the attacker using a highly directional 2.4 GHz waveguide antenna. Once you're sure only the attacker is visible, attach a microwave magnetron to the antenna and watch him burn.

    4. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      This should be modded Funny, not Insightful.

      Re-read the law. Stand Your Ground "lets you shoot" only if fearing for your life or at risk of being badly wounded. Not if you're afraid of being punched.

    5. Re:Figure out where he is located by Wolfling1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your suggestion is actually quite a good one.

      Microwaves are particularly troublesome for WiFi

      So, you could effectively jam the leech with a Microwave transmitter.

    6. Re:Figure out where he is located by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, the nerdy solution is to pull the cavity magnetron out of your microwave oven, add a highly directional antenna to the waveguide output, fire that baby up, and blow out the RF stage of his router. Extra nerdy points for plating/honing the cavities to re-tune the cavity magnetron tube to the correct wi-fi frequency (the diameter of the cavity is determined by c=f/lambda where c is the speed of light, f is the wi-fi center frequency, and lambda is the wavelength. Remember, electrons circulate (because of spin=1/2) around the hot cathode, and the basic operation is like that of a whistle or pop bottle (small amount of air moving across opening resonates according to the size of the bottle / small amount of electrons moving across the opening resonate according to the size of the cavity, remember that air is a pressure wave and travels slow, electrons and em radiation travel at the speed of light). Its been too long since I studied radar/electronics engineering.

    7. Re:Figure out where he is located by swillden · · Score: 2

      This is why you should carry pepper spray if you carry a gun.

      There is a large class of scenarios in which you put yourself at great legal risk if you go immediately to deadly force as a response -- and remember that in most states merely drawing a gun is threatening deadly force, which constitutes aggravated assault (or whatever the state calls it). The problem is that in those same situations there's a possibility that your opponent may realize you have a gun and go for it, which can leave you in a very bad situation.

      It's very valuable to have a non-lethal (legally, at least) at-a-distance self-defense option.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    8. Re:Figure out where he is located by rebot777 · · Score: 2

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shooting_of_Trayvon_Martin Not funny. It's pretty plausible you could get off.

    9. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Fights make deadly turns very fast. Someone punching me is enough for me to pull my weapon at the very least."

      See, there's your problem. Overreaction. If somebody punches you and you pull a gun, chances are YOU are the one who will be arrested.

      YOUR attitude doesn't matter. What matters -- 100% -- is theirs. Do they have deadly intent? Do they want to do more than just punch you in order to maybe cause you a fat lip or bloody nose? Then you might be justified. Maybe.

      You can end the threat quickly. Break their fingers. Kick them in the knee or groin. Poke them in the eye. It might cause injury, but nobody could reasonably argue that you were threatening them with death.

      Laws vary among states. But in general: if they don't have a weapon, you should not pull one either, if you want to stay out of jail. There are a few exceptions but not many.

      That is precisely the problem with police over-use of Tasers in recent years. Tasers are NOT "non-lethal". They are "less-lethal". The original intent was for law enforcement to use a Taser only in lieu of deadly force. In other words, only if their only other option is to shoot you. But instead, some police have used them to get old ladies out of cars during traffic stops. That's bad news. It demonstrates that many police are lazy and would rather torture people than face the possibility of even the slightest physical confrontation. In other words, cowards.

      A cowardly cop is a dangerous cop.

    10. Re:Figure out where he is located by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "Better to be judged by 12 then carried by 6"

      Even better to figure out whether you ARE really in danger, and thus stay out of the courtroom altogether.

    11. Re:Figure out where he is located by hairyfish · · Score: 2

      No.

      One has to make a reasonable presentation of a serious, life threatning situation. A punch in the nose of itself would generally be insufficient.

      Funny you say that, I know a guy (yes actually know him personally) who killed a man with one punch on the snoz. It wasn't the punch that killed the poor fellow but his head hitting the concrete from the fall after being knocked out instantly.

    12. Re:Figure out where he is located by bemenaker · · Score: 2

      Zimmerman is latino not white. Fail.

    13. Re:Figure out where he is located by Stuarticus · · Score: 2

      So if OP gets his gun and follows the leech around threateningly until he goads him into talking to him or scaring in some way first then he should be OK to shoot him? Don't want to get on the wrong side of the law here!

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    14. Re:Figure out where he is located by coinreturn · · Score: 2

      Wrong. For example, don't you know that sentences for crack cocaine (black people) are way stiffer than for powder (white people)?

  2. Change your WPA keys by supersat · · Score: 5, Informative

    WPS works by giving out your WPA keys, so if they've gotten in once through WPS, they will continue to have access.

    1. Re:Change your WPA keys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hope parent meant WPA2 rather than WPA.

      And use a strong pass phrase with a non-dictionary-word ssid.

    2. Re:Change your WPA keys by gweihir · · Score: 4, Informative

      Make that WPA2 and use a random-key. AFAIK WPA2 is still unbroken.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    3. Re:Change your WPA keys by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 2

      The person needs to disable WPS and verify that the router is capable of disabling WPS completely. Some routers do not actually disable the WPS function when WPS is disable. Security experts consider WPS to be completely broken.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    4. Re:Change your WPA keys by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spoofing a MAC address is trivial. You can do it in your network settings in Windows, and every router I've ever used gives the option. Finding a whitelisted MAC address is likely trivial for the hacker in this article (who broke in through WPS - much harder) because the MAC address is broadcast in the clear, so packet inspection will reveal the whitelisted MAC addresses. IP whitelists are also worthless.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    5. Re:Change your WPA keys by compro01 · · Score: 2

      It's a dictionary attack. Use a sufficiently long and random passphrase and that's not going to work.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    6. Re:Change your WPA keys by petermgreen · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are two operating modes for WPA2, PSK and enterprise. The vast majority of wifi networks run in PSK mode.

      In PSK mode all nodes (both end user and access point) use a shared secret key. Anyone with thatkey can decrypt any packet, spoof any user etc. So you had better make sure only truested devices have the key.

      In enterprise mode each end user has their own login and the system is supposed to protect the users from each other as well as from outsiders. The article you linked was about a flaw in enterprise mode that effectively degraded security to equivilent to PSK mode. It's a fairly serious issue for large enterprise deployments but not something that should be a concern for end users.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    7. Re:Change your WPA keys by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Since the client devices can remember it, it does not need to be memorable in any way. Just use a random-password generator, no structure or anything required.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  3. simple by polar+red · · Score: 4, Funny

    UTP

    --
    Yes, I'm left. You have a problem with that?
    1. Re:simple by poetmatt · · Score: 2

      or powerline ethernet if you really need something "wired" but vaguely more secure and not susceptible to most issues.
      http://www.newegg.com/Powerline-Networking/SubCategory/ID-294

    2. Re:simple by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Won't work if the hackers are on the same transformer leg as you. In an apartment building, that is almost guaranteed to be the case.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  4. Use squid by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Funny

    Setup squid and redirect all web traffic through it. Replace all images on machines that are not yours with goatse.

    1. Re:Use squid by admdrew · · Score: 5, Funny
    2. Re:Use squid by DigitAl56K · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you're going to go so far as to let them on to your network, instead of pranking them you could passively watch who they log into websites as in order to determine their identity, gather evidence, and file charges. Of course, disconnect your other systems - since if he's hacking your wifi he'll probably also try to probe your other devices.

      Of course, IANAL, and perhaps monitoring such things is illegal even though it's going over your private network.

  5. Local police won't be much help by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 3, Funny

    You can give them satellite images of the house of the person that stole your identity, and they won't drive over for that.

    So for something involving log files and such? Not a chance.

    You should redirect all network traffic to goatse for a week, and just use a 3G hotspot while your normal one kills the thief's eyes.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
    1. Re:Local police won't be much help by tftp · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ..of course it won't take long for them to find out who set up the redirects and is actually responsible for the kiddie porn.

      That is very, very far from being "of course." Police wants convictions, and there is nothing else to convict than an asocial nerd in a basement, with a stash of CP in his browser's cache. Those files do not carry an indication through which router they were obtained, since the browser keeps no logs. If you have them, you have them.

      The nerd, naturally, may confess to a lighter crime - such as stealing your keys and connecting to your router. You should be ready for a raid yourself, and better you keep your own nose clean - the pr0n that most people collect rarely comes with notarially certified age of all participants. This is a good example of "sow the wind, reap the whirlwind."

      Framing the thief for CP would be a massive overreaction. But the thief can compromise your own IP address by *really* downloading politically incorrect materials. So I wouldn't accept any honeypot scheme where the thief is actually allowed to go outside of your LAN. Doing a good job on a honeypot for just one guy is too expensive. In essence, if you cannot guarantee that your Wi-Fi is secure then what are you doing with it? Just hoping that no hacker shows up? Either make sure it is secure, or turn it off. There is no middle ground because it can lead to trouble.

  6. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by fruitbane · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why even do that? Simply set up a list of accepted MAC addresses and give them assigned IPs. Don't provide any service to a MAC address not matching known. Unfortunately, that only stops your router/AP from handing out IPs. They can still eavesdrop and work on listening in on traffic.

  7. If he joins your network... by Picass0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...I think that means he's consenting to letting you administrate his system. I suggest you do so.

    1. Re:If he joins your network... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not necessarily effective if his intention isn't web browsing. Internet is cheap. It sounds like an elaborate attempt to conceal illicit activity to me.

    2. Re:If he joins your network... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      alternately, leave the old one turned on but not physically connected to anything... waste more time!

    3. Re:If he joins your network... by flimflammer · · Score: 2

      Wrong.

  8. You could troll them in return. by Frobnicator · · Score: 4, Funny

    Log in to the Evil Twin network. Start a bunch of illegal torrents and "accidentally" alert the appropriate parties by IP address. Some appropriate in-theater movies and the MPAA would be a good start.

    --
    //TODO: Think of witty sig statement
    1. Re:You could troll them in return. by amorsen · · Score: 2

      The Evil Twin network likely doesn't have Internet access. Even if it does, it is probably using one of the other nearby wifi networks for connectivity.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:You could troll them in return. by Nerdfest · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If it has internet access and you don't feel like waiting for the MPAA to be their usual selves, sign up for a new gmail account and send a threat letter to a high ranking government official. You'll get a far faster and more dramatic response. You can be pretty much guaranteed that the issue will be investigated.

    3. Re:You could troll them in return. by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Would be a shame if that poor SOB were to accidentally stumble upon my internal malware infested honeypot. Used strictly for my own research purposes of course. This one is filled with bees, and they sting!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
  9. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So then he sets his MAC address to one on the allowed list. Not exactly a tough thing to do.

  10. Some quick basics by Pubstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The first thing would obviously be MAC whitelisting on the router, though if he is smart enough, he would just spoof his MAC to one of the ones on your network, so its unlikely it would stop him. Depending on where you need your wireless router, have you considered turning down the radio strength and putting the router in an area where it covers where you want to use it without the WiFi signal going too far outside the bounds of your house?

  11. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by faedle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Doubt that would work. The leecher has already demonstrated a knowledge of layer-2 attacks against 802.11, I doubt limiting your DHCP scope is going to stop them. They'll just null handshake one of your devices off the WLAN.

  12. Why lose your time? by ruir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Lets hope this article is just a marketing scheme. Anyway, in case it is genuine: Somebody has been freeloading, so what? You have got two options: 1) upgrade your security. double up encryption with MAC authorization. Hide your SSID. Maybe even going to digital certificates.Use only encrypted communications protocols. Many other options. Many time invested. 2) Setup a honeypot. Something open or better yet with poor security. Let him break, monitor the activity, eventually you will get a his personal data. Then decide on the course of action. Cheers

    1. Re:Why lose your time? by LukeWebber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Freeloading? If that was his only intention, he wouldn't have troubled to set up the evil twin. This guy is serious trouble, and you don't want him on your LAN.

    2. Re:Why lose your time? by Joce640k · · Score: 2

      Lets hope this article is just a marketing scheme. Anyway, in case it is genuine:

      Somebody has been freeloading, so what? You have got two options:
      1) upgrade your security. double up encryption with MAC authorization. Hide your SSID. Maybe even going to digital certificates.Use only encrypted communications protocols. Many other options. Many time invested.
      2) Setup a honeypot. Something open or better yet with poor security. Let him break, monitor the activity, eventually you will get a his personal data. Then decide on the course of action.

      Cheers

      3) Figure out the direction of his signal and put tinfoil on the wall there.

      --
      No sig today...
    3. Re:Why lose your time? by Hatta · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Anyway, in case it is genuine: Somebody has been freeloading, so what?

      Ask yourself, why would someone go to such great lengths to use someone else's bandwidth?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:Why lose your time? by dskoll · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I run an unsecured WiFi network (no WEP, WPA or WPA2).

      On the other hand, the only traffic accepted by my access concentrator is OpenVPN traffic. So yes, anyone can get an IP address from my DHCP server, but they can't do much with it unless they somehow break SSL public-key auth or obtain a copy of my key and certificate.

  13. Power & antenna placement by hottoh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    -Reduce transmit power
    -Move or buy a directional antenna

    Have time on your hands?
    http://www.ex-parrot.com/~pete/upside-down-ternet.html

    1. Re:Power & antenna placement by Sarten-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That link is exactly what I came to post. It's clearly overkill, but overkill is the perfect tool to show someone that they are hopelessly outclassed and they should seriously reconsider their actions.

      --
      You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
    2. Re:Power & antenna placement by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      overkill is the perfect tool to show someone that they are hopelessly outclassed and they should seriously reconsider their actions.

      Shock and awwhhhhh?

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Power & antenna placement by tgd · · Score: 2

      That link is exactly what I came to post. It's clearly overkill, but overkill is the perfect tool to show someone that they are hopelessly outclassed and they should seriously reconsider their actions.

      Except they're not hopelessly outclassed. They broke into the questioner's network and the questioner had to ask Slashdot instead of addressing it himself.

      He/she's already demonstrated they've been hopelessly outclassed.

  14. Shut off your radio. by faedle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they're going to go through the trouble of setting up a honeypot, you might was well give up and just shut the radio off and run 100% wired.

    Or, go rogue yourself and capture all his traffic. Bonus points if you rate-limit the wireless to effectively have no bandwidth.

    The local cops? If your local police department is anything like mine, they don't even send out officers to investigate real property crimes like theft anymore. They'll just laugh at your little WiFi problem.

    1. Re:Shut off your radio. by JLennox · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Phones, tablets, etc lack Ethernet ports. It's pretty close to deprecated for consumer electronics and understandably so.

    2. Re:Shut off your radio. by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They'll just laugh at your little WiFi problem.

      You must have exceptionally smart cops where you live if you think they'd understand what OP was talking about. If I called cops with this problem any place I've lived, I suspect I'd be transferred about three times before someone would ask "Son, are you talking about the child porn?" and would just hang up when I said no.

    3. Re:Shut off your radio. by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you can find out who's stealing your bandwidth, you don't need the police -- you need a lawyer. In civil matters they are a *lot* more scary.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  15. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by fruitbane · · Score: 2

    At least it slows him down. He has to find and grab an accepted MAC, and you'll know he's trying to connect as soon as you have a collision on the DHCP.

  16. wired by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    You could try leaving the access point open and partitioning it with an ipsec segment. Deny any other connection attempts to the interface. Otherwise just hardwire it and be done with it. Wireless will never be secure. You'll just end up fighting a war of attrition, and that 16yo hax0r has much more free time than you do.

  17. fair trade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're giving him cancer, he's using some of your wifi. Just segregate your personal network from the wifi network and see if you have QoS options to limit how much you share. Can't we all just get along? ;)

  18. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by faedle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doubt it would even slow him down. Some of the semi-automated leecher tools do this automatically already.

  19. I've used Wifi Analizer by eksith · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On my Android phone, it will detect the closest Wifi signals and you may be able to pinpoint where exactly this evil twin is. A directional antenna may help, but without knowing exactly where to direct it to, you may be aiding the leech. You can try disabling SSID broadcast and reducing transmit power.

    No one will trouble themselves this much just to avoid paying a monthly fee and just by the fact they're knowledgable in these means they've spent a lot of time online already. My guess is that this individual is conducting illegal activities through yours and your neighbor's connections, so you or your neighbors may get a visit from law enforcement pretty soon.

    --
    If computers were people, I'd be a misanthrope.
    1. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 5, Informative

      "My guess is that this individual is conducting illegal activities through yours and your neighbor's connections"

      This is highly likely. The guy has invested much time and effort in this so they clearly have motives other than saving a few bucks. OP should make attempts to locate this guy and to shut him down. Use laptops or cell phones with wireless monitoring applications to locate the guy's AP. Nothing too fancy, just do a bit of sneaker-netting while watching the signal strength. You don't need to triangulate the location to within a foot, you just need to get a general idea of where this thing is. Once you get close you should be able to tell which building/car it is in. If this yields inconclusive results then contact the local HAM club. They may be able to assist you in locating a rogue AP or wifi leech in exchange for beer and pizza.

      Also, OP needs to file a police report. Will the police do anything? No, of course not. However, it will help to shield OP from liability when the FBI comes knocking in regard to whatever illegal activities are being conducted through his internet connection. He'll be able to point to the police reports as evidence that someone else was on the network long before the authorities showed up.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    2. Re:I've used Wifi Analizer by AmongTheBoulders · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Most ham radio clubs have fox hunting events now and then, where they see who can be the first to find a hidden transmitter. I know you mentioned possibly contacting the local ham radio club. I have never participated in a fox hunt, and don't know much about doing that, but presumably they would each use a held directional antenna to see which direction the signal is strongest from.

      I wonder which wireless monitoring applications on a laptop or cell phone would show more than just the nearby wireless routers? The old laptop that I occasionally use, only shows the nearby wireless routers.

      Since he is an advanced Wi-Fi leach, he is probably has a high gain directional antenna, and is likely to be somewhat further away from the wireless router than is typical for Wi-Fi. I am not sure how far away he could be with such an antenna.

  20. Buy a directional antenna by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

    ...but only if it comes with a cool pings-like-the-motion-detectors-in-Aliens handset, as where's the fun in not having that?

    --
    I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
  21. Oh come on... by lesincompetent · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do i really have to say it? WPA2, 63 characters pwd.

    1. Re:Oh come on... by Time_Ngler · · Score: 2

      A router that is using WPA2 with a pre-shared key may also have WPS. A lot of them don't even allow you to turn WPS off.

  22. Sounds worse than a leech by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't a leech just look for an open access point? One with a fast connection would be a bonus.

    Your interloper would seem to be doing something more nefarious. Why does a simple leech need an evil twin?

    Is your local constabulary at all competent in this sort of matters, or are they the kind that go around wardriving for open access points? Because it's gonna suck to try to explain the problem if they don't have a clue, but something's up, and to me it sounds like something leaning toward the criminal.

    I think I'd get the directional antenna. Maybe you're dealing with the neighbor's 12 year old, so just alerting the parents could do the trick. If it's your local psycho, that's another story.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
    1. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Is your local constabulary at all competent in this sort of matters

      Do you seriously need to ask this?

      Have you seen any evidence anywhere that the local police are knowledgeable or interested in such things? If so, where?

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Sounds worse than a leech by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Come to Australia. You might accidentally get killed from the local fauna, but there are some very intelligent people in the constab. They're not all on the streets running the breathalysers, perhaps, but the ones I've dealt with actually show up if you report you heard a gun shot, and ask questions as if they're thinking about your answers, rather than just recording them. It's almost as if they require the ability to think from their troops. I'm originally from Los Angeles, and the contrast between the two police cultures seems pretty dramatic to me.

      --
      Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  23. Change the SSID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    To FBI surveillance van.

  24. If you find him... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you find him, give him props and buy him a beer and ask him to share how he's doing what he's doing with you. Sounds like some pretty cool shit.

    --
    -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    1. Re:If you find him... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      And THEN break his legs.

      Right?

    2. Re:If you find him... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      And THEN break his legs.

      Right?

      Well, as far as stealing Wi-Fi? Nah... as far as that problem is concerned, I'd leave a throttled open access point, label it "guest" and call it a day.

      The Evil Twin... that could be a lot more sinister. If he's engaging in identity theft against your family, then yeah, but break his fingers, not his legs. Still use social engineering on him first and learn, though.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  25. start knocking on doors by radiumsoup · · Score: 5, Funny

    start knocking on doors and asking your neighbors if they would mind terribly if you spoke with their 15 year old son for a few minutes, because you've determined he's been hacking your wifi. Eventually, you'll hit the right house. For the wrong houses, act confused and say you must have miscalculated by a house or two, and that you're sorry. Bring cookies to show you're not an ass, though.

    1. Re:start knocking on doors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Ah yeah ... bring cookies to the neighbours and ask if they've got a 15-year old.

      Well, that solves the problem of getting the cops interested.

    2. Re:start knocking on doors by houghi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I did that once: looking for a 15 year old boy. I must say, Chris Hansen is a nice guy and very understanding once I explained the misunderstanding.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  26. Some ideas by Proudrooster · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lock incoming connections down by MAC address and disable your SSID. This will probably make them go away. Also, run WPA2+AES and pick a longish WIFI key.

    If you have an ASUS Dark Knight router you can setup multiple SSIDs (guest networks) that disconnect every 60 seconds and name them "StopStealingMyWifi". This way you real SSID is hidden and your multiple guest networks are visible, but are unusable. You can also set hours of operations for your radios on the ASUS and turn off your radios at night and when you are not home. Lastly, if you are running dual band, turn off the 2.4 Ghz and run on the 5Ghz band. The 5Ghz signal travels poorly outside your home. WIFI is tough to secure with all of the WIFI hacking tools, but get a good router and rotate shield frequencies and should go away.

    Lastly, here is an article on the subject.... this article disagrees with me on disabling your SSID and I am sure others will have an opinion....
    http://www.wikihow.com/Secure-Your-Wireless-Home-Network

    1. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As I'm sure somebody else will point out, SSID hiding won't hide the fact that the network is there. The only good thing that you mentioned is turning off your wifi at night, but that's not necessarily a real solution (servers and such like to do things at night, however if you're running servers off of wifi and they are at all important there's something wrong with you anyways).

    2. Re:Some ideas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Knock up a cron job to change your WPA2 key every 24 hours. Use a QR code generator to print out the code on paper for your new key every morning, so you can just snap it with your phone and you're on. He'll get bored of trying to break something that changes faster than he can break it, and he'll move onto someone else.

      Agree also with disabling wireless at the times he uses it, and when you're not, if this is feasible for your lifestyle.

      And 5GHz also sounds sensible.

      If you do find out who he is, change your SSID to *his* name and address. That should freak him a bit.

    3. Re:Some ideas by vux984 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. In this case it is irrelevant. The attacker has already demonstrated relatively sophisticated attacks. We are well past SSID broadcast as being remotely relevant.

      He is using tools that will find your network regardless of whether SSID is on or off. There is no point in inconveniencing yourself.

      Its the equivalent of trying to hide by putting on dark clothes and a hat when you already know your pursuer is using infrared, passive sonar, and motion sensors to find you.

    4. Re:Some ideas by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The techniques you describe will be effective against someone who just wants free Internet access, but if they're attacking for any other reason, it's like going into a bar in the bad part of town and proclaiming how tough you are: it does nothing to improve your safety, but makes you a much more attractive target.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  27. Stealing Electricity by CambodiaSam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If someone had an extension cord plugged into my outside outlet and it ran to their house to steal power, I would walk over, knock on the door, and ask them to stop it. And yes, I would also unplug it.

    If you have the means to determine where they are it's worth asking them to stop. That alone might change their attitude toward poking at networks.

  28. go to CAT 5 by alen · · Score: 2

    you can defeat almost every trick like mac filtering or limiting dhcp scope

    your best bet is to go back to wired and not send your data over radio waves

  29. Let him connect by sjames · · Score: 2

    Transparently redirect everything to goatse.

  30. WPA2-Enterprise by Rinisari · · Score: 3, Informative

    * Use enterprise auth to a RADIUS server with an LDAP backend?
    * Lower the transmit power to something that just works within your place?
    * Use just A or just B or just N? Maybe they're on older tech?
    * Configure your router not to well, route. Use it as just an AP and you have to manually set the IP info on your machines, and the router is not *.*.*.1 on the network.
    * Do the above, but use an external VPN for all of your traffic. A static route in the router gets you onto the VPN.
    * Change your SSID to something threatening to indicate that you're onto them and that you asked Slashdot how to make them stop?

  31. Be enlightened by Kohath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Change your SSID to "Do_not_steal_my_WiFi". It's the enlightened approach -- the same approach that the "Gun Free Zone" and "Drug Free Zone" people use. Only backward, ignorant people would disagree.

  32. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if i have a device not work for some reason and i see an IP conflict then i'll know right away

    Unless you're setting your subnet mask to only be 10 or so addresses, I'd just pick an address outside of your DHCP scope and I'd never conflict. You're treating DHCP as a security measure when it's a convenience measure.

    captcha: gateway. How fitting.

  33. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by ios+and+web+coder · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why even do that? Simply set up a list of accepted MAC addresses and give them assigned IPs. Don't provide any service to a MAC address not matching known. Unfortunately, that only stops your router/AP from handing out IPs. They can still eavesdrop and work on listening in on traffic.

    I use reserved MAC addresses and a non-trivial WPA2 password. The router won't connect any unknown MAC addresses.

    That seems to work for me.

    If they crack that, they aren't leeches. They are crooks. Call the FBI.

    --

    "For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong."

    -H. L. Mencken

  34. Change Password by pellik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Brute force attacks take time, lots of time. Just start changing your key every week and he will probably go away. Having your computer run 96 hours to get a password that then changes 72 hours later just isn't worth it, even for a criminal. If he keeps at it then someone just enjoys the challenge, and you should hunt them down just for the mystery.

  35. Allow access... by jameshofo · · Score: 2

    well depending on the level of control you have, I'd grant them access and then just blackhole the traffic. The lecher will eventual self discriminate.

    --
    Good leaders run toward problems, bad leaders hide from them.
  36. I don't get it by chord.wav · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some neighbor comes in good faith and opens his digital life to you, so you can MITM him and this is how you react? That is rude man. I think that guy deserves an apology sent from one of his social networks accounts.

    1. Re:I don't get it by Rockoon · · Score: 2

      This is what I came here to say. Get this guys facebook/twitter/email credentials and have some serious serious fun.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  37. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by TrentTheThief · · Score: 4, Funny

    They probably are the FBI...

  38. Re:Backtrace him by pedrop357 · · Score: 4, Funny

    NO NO NO

    Create a GUI in Visual Basic and track his IP.

  39. $10k by puddingebola · · Score: 3, Funny

    Place $10,000 in a cedar box with an Eisenhower Silver dollar. Include a photo of the person in question. Mail to General Delivery Attention: Teddy New York, NY 10001 No bodies, no witnesses, no questions. We're offering 2 for 1 on contract this week, just include an additional photo.

  40. Be careful what you do by ALeader71 · · Score: 2

    Don't do anything which might give this guy a case to counter your actions. Set up a new WiFi router and move your equipment to this new system. Use a super long key. Something that will take him a long time to crack. See what happening on the 5Ghz side of things, and maybe move operations there.
    Then set up a little monitoring software and see what you can find out. Maybe you can discover who this person is, and send him a cease and desist letter. It's shocking and unexpected. Log everything with date/time stamps in case the leech attempts a confrontation, but that's unlikely to happen.

    --
    Only the dead have seen the end of War. - Plato
  41. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by icebike · · Score: 2

    Yeah, call the FBI. That will work. Chuckle.

    As soon as these guys clone your mac address (which they can get easily with airsnort) then the only thing stopping them is WPA2.
    And if you have a lot of machines connected, they will be able to sniff enough traffic to get your WPA2 password fairly quickly.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  42. a few options, but annoying by datapharmer · · Score: 4, Informative

    So yes, I've dealt with it. The easy solution is go wired for a while, setup a honeypot and track them down. Once you know where they are let them know you are less than pleased and if they don't stop there will be a call to the FCC and local authorities as well as a civil suit for harassment. If you can't go wired Lower your ACK timing and transmit power so they can't get a good signal without standing on your doorstep. switch to a certificate based system instead of a password based system with a new ssid. On the new system setup a proxy that requires additional authentication to reach the internet. Assign static macs to your own devices and block all other local IPs via iptables to prevent them from self-assigning one. As for deauthentication attacks, the best bet is to find them and ans send over a nastygram.

    --
    Get a web developer
  43. Oh no! by Nukenbar · · Score: 2

    He found me.

  44. Your options depend on your hardware by BlueBlade · · Score: 3, Informative

    Basically, there's nothing you can do if you keep using WPA.

    One option is to lower your wi-fi antenna power to exclude the area where the attacks are coming from. This can be hard to do if you need good coverage for a whole house or some such.

    Your best bet would be to use either 802.1x or EAP-PEAP. That's highly dependent on what router you're using, usually only high-end routers support these options, although some home routers certainly do (I remember the good old WAP54G supporting it). If you're going 802.1x, just setup a radius server, configure your devices and you're pretty much set. If you go the PEAP route, you'll need some certificates, and possibly a radius server unless you use client certificates for authentication.

    Both options will foil your wannabe hacker. Plus, you'll likely have the only advanced Wi-Fi setup around, gaining you geek creds ;)

    --
    Religion is the best example of mass psychosis
  45. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let's see...

    As per OP set up MAC address filtering, if this guy is trying to set up evil twins & trying to do handshake captures on your network, MAC addresses are spoofable.

    I also like to hide the SSID just to make things harder, but if he's passive listening, that may not help either... though at this point, a hidden SSID with WPA2 encryption does not make for an attractive target, esp. when the MAC needs to be spoofed (I wouldn't know this till i broke through the 1st 2).

    However, the single most effective thing you can do is limit your antenna's radius... if your router's stock firmware can't do it, dd-wrt and friends can. Stand outside your house till you can't connect to your wifi at your fence anymore, adjusting the radius in increments.

    Last, but not least, go buy a steel fish line and drywall saw at home depot and wire up your house w ethernet ports and disable your wifi. Tough luck on the phones though, unless you can find an adapter for them.

  46. Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by kwerle · · Score: 2

    Isn't there FreeBSD or Linux disk image that'll solve this?
    <WIFI> <=> [Router] < routes only to > [IP address of solution]
    Where the solution does something like the standard coffeeshop login +
    * Special account gets unlimited time & bandwidth
    * Non-special account needs to sign up every hour & gets diminishing bandwidth (if you want to allow visitors)

    Something like http://dev.wifidog.org/, but under active development?

    1. Re:Isn't there an OS box that'll solve this? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Isn't there FreeBSD or Linux disk image that'll solve this?
      <WIFI> <=> [Router] < routes only to > [IP address of solution]
      Where the solution does something like the standard coffeeshop login +
      * Special account gets unlimited time & bandwidth
      * Non-special account needs to sign up every hour & gets diminishing bandwidth (if you want to allow visitors)

      Something like http://dev.wifidog.org/, but under active development?

      This, perhaps?

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  47. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

    The authorities will not care... But a usb mounted at the reflective center in a wok is a nice directional antenna to find the evil twin.

  48. Letterbox drop: 'how to secure your wireless' by gnoshi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are two ways of dealing with this: getting this person off [i]your[/i] network, and getting this person off [i]everyone's[/i] network.
    Personally, I think if you can get everyone to squeeze him off their networks then that will probably be the nicest kind of vengeance.

    Consider writing up a simple letter (starting with: Just a note from a neighbor), detail that someone in the area has been breaking into wireless networks and may be pirating stuff/doing illegal things which could lead to difficulties for the actual owner of the OP. Then, provide a basic summary of what to do to avoid it (e.g. disable WPS, etc etc) and maybe even provide URLs for the major router manufacturers.
    With [i]some[/i] luck, [i]some[/i] people will pay attention and lock down their network.

    If you know who it is doing it (using handy phone apps to detect signal strength, or a directional antenna) then you could do a 'special' letterbox drop for that one person with a 'how to buy an internet connection'.

    Mind you, if this person is using an 'evil twin' they may be doing more than just stealing Wifi. If their MAC address is stable (i.e. they are not modifying it) you may want to capture some sample traffic with that included. If things do go awry you can use that to provide evidence it was that person's computer, possibly.

  49. Re:WIFi direction finding by icebike · · Score: 2

    There is an app for that.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  50. Tinfoil hat cure by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Make a little shield with a bit of foil and a coathanger. While tracking the incoming attempts, shield your WAP from various directions until it stops. Gives you a direction, and you can bend the coathanger into a little stand to hold the shield in place next to your WAP. It's likely to be in the direction of a near wall, isn't it?

    Amazing stuff, tinfoil.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
    1. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by circletimessquare · · Score: 4, Funny

      Amazing stuff, tinfoil.

      it makes a great hat

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    2. Re:Tinfoil hat cure by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      More elegantly, once you've got a location on an external wall that consistently blocks the intruder, mount a decorative mirror. The silvering on the mirror should do the same job as the tinfoil while hiding its purpose behind teh pretty.

      (Not many people realise that this is where Feng Shui came from. Back before ancient China lost its knowledge of RF tech.)

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  51. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 3, Interesting

    if i have a device not work for some reason and i see an IP conflict then i'll know right away

    Unless you're setting your subnet mask to only be 10 or so addresses, I'd just pick an address outside of your DHCP scope and I'd never conflict. You're treating DHCP as a security measure when it's a convenience measure.

    captcha: gateway. How fitting.

    I think that's the point; I set my subnet mask to /30 and assign a MAC to each IP. That way, any attackers have to sniff the MAC of an active connection and kick that connection in order to connect. This is very noticeable, and any leecher's going to have a really bad connection (as when my device gets kicked, it's going to attempt to reestablish, kicking them off). Doesn't stop passive surveillance, but it'll stop the leechers.

  52. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is why I am flabbergasted that with all the problems people have with security with WEP and WPA that it never occurred to anyone to do a DHE key exchange before swapping anything that requires the preshared key and adding an artificial minimum to the time between authentication attempts of any kind, such as 15 seconds. That would instantly fix the current weakness with WPA2 and slow down all unknown attacks in the future.

  53. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Calling local ham radio enthusiasts would probably lead to some very entertaining results.

    The most memorable story I've ever heard along those lines was that a couple of hams had access to a fairly large dish antenna and were setting up some sort of satellite communications (for work, not play). A guy nearby was running a horribly unshielded CB amplifier that was crapping all over their signal. They told him to knock it off. He refused. They pointed out that he was blowing way past FCC limits on transmission power. He ignored them. They pointed the dish straight at his shack and transmitted maximum power at it. Within a few minutes smoke was pouring out of it... bet you could fry a router pretty easily.

  54. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Deekin_Scalesinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't know about the hiding portion - any hacker with any skills at all are going to find them. I for one would be far more interested in someone who hides their SSID than someone in a faceless mass of wifis. Makes me think that they are relying on being hidden, and thus have fewer layers of defense.

    --
    "As the intrepid kobold companion continues his journey, he begins to wonder... if priests raises dead, why anybody die?
  55. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Because it's not like the MAC addresses that are allowed get broadcast over the air when they are in use or anything.

  56. create your own sniffed AP by sven_eee · · Score: 2

    I had a problem like this once.
    To solve it I setup a second access point with throttled bandwidth then captured all of its data, not only was I able to capture his logins/passwords but was able to identify him and his address. Then it was a mater of using firesheep to take control of his Facebook page ;) and sending I nicely worded letter to his home address.

  57. troll them! by fazey · · Score: 2

    First use signal strength to identify which house it is... Then rent a black van, and park it in that area for a few days. I bet it stops. If not, start noting all the activity and logging it, and submit it to the ic3. Thats about the only people I can think of that would even have the expertise to know what they are looking at. Then they would surely have to come investigate it themselves... but id also pretty much HAND them the case by videoing the pieces and doing the explanations... its a pretty weak possibility, but if they hand that off to local law enforcement, they cant ignore it.

  58. Disable WPS and Change Your Key by nedwidek · · Score: 2

    Disable WPS or if your router doesn't allow you to do that, buy one that does.

    Change to WPA2 and use a long, random key (a non-sense sentence will work too). Yes, it's a pain to have to set your devices up again, but it's the only way to take away their access.

    Hiding your SSID, MAC filtering, etc. will do nothing if the script they are using is somewhat intelligent or if they have a more than a passing knowledge of what they are doing.

    And if you don't want to just foist this issue off on someone else, help your neighbors to do the same.

    --
    Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
  59. evil twin by Spazmania · · Score: 5, Informative

    The evil twin makes finding the culprit a cakewalk. Download inSSIDer and walk around. When the evil twin's signal is strongest, you're outside his door.

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:evil twin by SpecBear · · Score: 2

      And if you're not comfortable with physical confrontation, just change your SSID to his address. He'll probably get the hint and back off.

    2. Re:evil twin by soccerisgod · · Score: 2

      Expensive? Really? All you need is a small embedded device with WLAN and a modified WLAN driver that just bangs out frames unconditionally and without pause, ideally with 40 MHz bandwidth. (Tx99/Tx100). It's not exactly the same as a jammer but it works just as well.

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  60. Re:Don't figth it, be nice and live with it. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    So next you get a letter from the RIAA ask you to pay $300,000 for distribution of copyrighted files.

    Or the FBI comes SWAT team wanting to know about that kiddie porn....

  61. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by bcmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why would he even send a DHCP request?

    (Several posts here are talking as if DHCP is a vital stage in setting up a network connection.)

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  62. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Synerg1y · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And somebody like me would completely own you for it:

    1. I have the technical know how to set my SSID to hidden: red flag #1
    2. What else do I have running if my SSID is hidden?

    In my case, I log all my traffic, and honestly it might take me a second to notice, all it would take is a few hiccups of my bandwidth for me to take a quick look at the settings and at that point, I'd log your traffic for a while, see what I can gather, and go find a zero-day, break through, escalate privilege, send your pr0n to your mom via the facebook login I logged, and delete your registry before I'm done.

    So in short, you never quite know what you're logging into when you go rogue on wifi :)

  63. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    At least it slows him down. He has to find and grab an accepted MAC, and you'll know he's trying to connect as soon as you have a collision on the DHCP.

    Yea, it'll take him another 30 seconds to spoof his MAC address. That will really slow him down. *nod*

  64. Not GOATSE... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 2

    turn your router off, reconfigure it or replace it, go into paranoid mode, if the router does port forwarding take all port 80 and 443 attempts and direct them to your proxys:

    http://tips.fbi.gov/
    and
    https://tips.fbi.gov/

    set up a linux host, plugged in wired and an exception for the above rule, set up authenticated squid...

    or just turn your router off for a while and go wired....

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
  65. Scorched Earth Policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I believe in the scorched Earth policy:

    Brick his doppelganger AP by doing a bad firmware update on it.

    Go to dealextreme and buy a Wi-Fi jammer and use it whenever you're not home or asleep.

    Change your AP's name to his address plus "..is a sex offender. Hide your kids"

  66. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by meerling · · Score: 5, Informative

    Make sure you don't allow admin over wifi. Most routers have a setting so you can only administer it from a wired connection. This isn't an absolute or a fix for the base situation, it's just an extra hurdle for them if they get in and want to screw with you for fighting back.

  67. Re:WIFi direction finding by X0563511 · · Score: 2

    Failing that, any ham who enjoys RDF would be happy to help, provided they have gear that can listen in on that high of a frequency. Chances are the ones that can are the ones you want helping you anyway :)

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  68. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by meerling · · Score: 2

    If the wifi is open, they are inviting people to share.
    This one is NOT open, so yeah, they are crackers, and that's illegal, but your local cops probably won't do anything if you call, but it's worth a shot.

  69. WPA2 not an option by Innovative1 · · Score: 2

    Those of you recommending a long randomly generated WPA2 password need to RTFA. He has been hacked via the WPS vulnerability. Once you have obtained the WPS pin you have permanent access into that router and have the ability to retrieve the WPA2 password in plaintext every time that he changes it. The pin cannot be changed. Depending on the router you may or may not be able to disable WPS. Next time buy a router that has the option to disable WPS and TURN IT OFF. Over 12 million routers are now exploitable via this hack and have been for quite some time. The exparrot option or sniffing his traffic are the best options.

  70. Set SSID to UnauthorizedTrafficRoutedThroughPolice by mrcaseyj · · Score: 3, Funny

    Set your SSID to "UnauthorizedTrafficRoutedThroughPolice"
    and/or
    Set up a server between your ISP and wireless access point with a VPN. If you get caught by his evil twin access point, you will know because your VPN connection will fail. Even if it doesn't fail at least your traffic should be secure.
    or
    Set your SSID to "ConnectingHereConstitutesConsentToEnterAndSearchYourHouse" Maybe the opportunity for an easy search would get the cops interested.
    You should probably file a complaint with the police in case his illegal activity comes back to your IP address.
    You may want to find out what kind of person you are dealing with before getting the police involved. Your strategy should probably be different if you are dealing with a local gang leader or homicide parollee rather than a high school nerd.
    If the offender happens to be on probation it could give you extra leverage.
    Keep in mind that if he lives next door he can listen in on your conversations with a sensitive directional microphone. He could also probably easily tap your phone, especially if it is cordless or cellular. So be carefull about speaking your passwords or other sensitive information out loud. Mail theft, burglary, vandalism, and other nasty attacks could become an issue.

  71. CO-OP by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a solution - organize a neighborhood open wireless mesh network co-op.

    It would be much more satisfying to make stone soup, than reinforce a stone wall.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:CO-OP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, it'd be much more satisfying to engage in a little frontier justice.

      Any solution that doesn't end with you telling the leech, "Bite the curb. I said, put your teeth on the motherfucking curb," is a non-starter, frankly.

    2. Re:CO-OP by screwdriver · · Score: 2

      Since he set up an "evil twin" to trick the OP into connecting to it, I doubt free internet is all the attacker is after. It's probably a bored teenager. Connect to it and then start downloading the latest top 10 pop hits MP3's from thepiratebay and seed the shit out of them. If he tries to hack your network, WPA is actually pretty secure if you use a strong enough password. Or you could just let him connect but redirect his web traffic to lemonparty.org or meatspin.com.

    3. Re:CO-OP by AVee · · Score: 3, Funny

      That coupled with naming and shaming. Sniff everything, wait for an email to pass by, print it and stick it to every lamppost in the neighborhood. Or log all URLs visited and print those. That will get the point across and on top of that provides some entrainment to your neighbors.

    4. Re:CO-OP by neurovish · · Score: 2

      Or send him to the upside-down-ternet

  72. Hidden SSID = Bad Juju by kroby · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is widely known by security professionals that hiding your SSID actually decreases security. For starters, it is easy enough to sniff a SSID out of the air. What is more concerning is that wireless clients configured to connect to a hidden network will constantly try to connect to any wireless network, essentially asking "Are you my network?" A malicious access point could say, "Yup, sure am!" At that point your wireless client will be more than happy to divulge your preshared key. There are even affordable retail products that accomplish this out of the box. Check out the Wi-Fi Pineapple.

  73. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Slowing him down is a good idea. Traffic-shape any non-whitelist MAC to a frustratingly slow but still believable bandwidth. He might just think your connection sucks and move on, without suspecting you've throttled him. It can't be impossibly slow, just pretty slow, like 28.8kbps modem slow.

  74. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lots of problems as others point out.Another solution: QOS. Do MAC filtering. Those in the trusted list get full speed. Those not get a much slower speed. Play with it a bit you want it fast enough that the hacker things they own you and doesn't try to figure out your MAC address but slow enough you don't mind losing that much bandwidth and it is painful to the hacker so they go on to other networks. Say 2Mbps with a 64kbps upload. Fast enough to be reasonable for a bottom tier internet package slow enough that no sane leech would choose you as the preferred target. Then enable logging, reduce signal strength, etc other games.

  75. Turn off your WiFi by accessbob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Turn it on at the power button only when you need it. That will make a very poor quality connection for the attacker and they will move on, and it will also save you money on your electricity.

    If you can't live without an always-on connection then you will have to get aggressive and really go after the attacker.

  76. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by dragon-file · · Score: 2

    Actually you dont 'change' the MAC address, you merely mask it. The MAC is a hardwired chip on the network device. But I guess and idiot would try to change it.

    --
    Whenever a player quits EVE to go play WoW, the Average IQ of both games increase.
  77. Middle man his ass by Nyder · · Score: 2

    If someone is leeching your wifi, look up how to middle man attack. Steal all his info. Find out who you are dealing with. Be nasty. Be a dick back.

    Fight fire with fire.

    You get the picture I am making here? You have someone that keeps breaking into your wifi, so set a fucking trap.

    For the record, police are stupid as all fuck, and they won't do anything for you.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  78. Re:Don't broadcast SSID by cogeek · · Score: 2

    Jesus Christ, do you read? Did you not see where I said to set the passkey to a long, random phrase (AKA WPA2 PSK)? And setting the DHCP subnet to something other than the idiotic 192.168.0.1 or .1.1 that comes out of the box will do a lot to prevent them from bypassing DHCP. Set it to any 32 addresses in the 10.x network and done.

  79. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't you have to crack the WPA2 before you can find one of the valid mac addresses?

    Don't think so.

    Stations brodcasts its mac address to the access point in clear text.
    http://www.maxi-pedia.com/how+to+break+MAC+filtering

    The stations may also send beacons, depending on how they are configured.
    http://www.wi-fiplanet.com/tutorials/article.php/1492071

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  80. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by RR · · Score: 2

    Don't you have to crack the WPA2 before you can find one of the valid mac addresses?

    No.

    --
    Have a nice time.
  81. Re:Whitelist!? by jon3k · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And I can also spoof MAC addresses. MAC filtering is about 1/100th of a secure wireless network.

  82. Walk to the farmers' market! by girlinatrainingbra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    re: For example, I regularly walk 6 miles to a farmer's market and 6 miles back to save a couple of dollars on the price of vegetables. That's three hours of walking to save a minute or two's income.
    .
    Bonus for you is that you got three hours of aerobic cardiovascular workout time! You'll be healthier, and (two or so dollars) wealthier, and wise! The strange this is that there are people who actually pay other people and companies money for the opportunity to exercise on a treadmill or a stationary bike. These people tend to gas up their SUV and drive the two miles over to their "gym" to do pretend walking and pay for that privilege. You, sir or madam, on the other hand have gamed the system and not fallen for the idiocracy. You get the benefits without the costs.
    Also, you're not a leech, so you're also a good person. Plus you also eat vegetables: double-plus good person! (My mom has me convinced that stealing the carrot sticks from the fridge is bad, so I'm tempted more and do it more! It was just a year ago that I figured out that carrots were healthy! I've been conned into liking veggies!)
    ;>)
    Bonus point of spelling pickiness: your response was to Re:I've used Wifi Analizer . Surely, the GP poster meant "Analyzer", unless the word "analizer" tells us more about the GP and his probings by alien species than we wanted to know....

  83. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

    On a modern network, it is.... at least at the consumer level where nobody knows how to configure a subnet manually, but if you're managing any kind of large scale network it becomes very difficult to work with static configurations on every workstation even when you know how.

    That being said, for a small network you *could* simply assign a static configuration to everything and turn off DHCP. It wouldn't protect you because, as others have said, the MAC and IP address could be cloned anyway, but it would offer an added layer of annoyance for whoever's doing it, such that they'd probably go somewhere else.

    The truth that nobody wants to really admit is that there's simply no way to keep a determined hacker out of a wireless network. It's, by its very nature, an open network. About the best you can do, short of going wired, is regularly rotate your wireless passwords (get a new one every day, for example), and also maybe set up a VPN on your local network, so that even if you're on the wifi you can't actually do anything with it without connecting to the VPN.

  84. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly you do not have someone trying to leech your network, or you are not able to detect such a user. MAC addresses are broadcast in the clear. This is because otherwise every device on the network would have to decrypt every single packet in order to determine whether or not the device is the intended recipient of the packet. All the attacker has to do inspect a packet, find the MAC address, then spoof that MAC address.

    WiFi Protected Setup (WPS) is broken, and on many routers it cannot be fixed without disabling WiFi completely. Even a 64-character, high entropy password on WPA2 AES will not work. This is the problem faced by the poster of the article.

    In my mind, the best solution is high entropy, long password, WPA2-AES with a router that does not have WPS or is known to be able to safely disable WPS (such as latest versions of DD-WRT).

    --

    I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

  85. "Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by Grog6 · · Score: 2

    Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

    If I have a HCP, that means I'd be armed.

    Castle doctrine does not protect criminals, by its definitions section, in FLA. Here the area extends to the property line at least, by case law.

    Law is a great thing until you realize you're on the wrong side of the line, at the wrong moment in time. :)

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by PyroMosh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Leaving aside the fact questionable legality of your little nerd-vigilante justice fantasies and granting for a moment that the fact that what the guy is doing is technically a felony...

      Ignoring the possibility that the poor sap that opens the door might have nothing to do with the attempt - could be his 15 year old kid... worse yet, it could be a zombie machine trying to connect...

      Leaving all that aside and assuming that everything is as it appears on it's face. You go over and knock, assault the guy and get the right person...

      This all falls under a category I like to call "things I don't want to have to explain to a judge".

      TL;DR: You're being criminally stupid.

    2. Re:"Unauthorized Access" is a Felony. by swillden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Under State law, I am required to stop the progress of a Felony by law, or be an accessory.

      Cite? I'm quite familiar with this area of the law in several states, and I'm skeptical that Florida requires you to intervene.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  86. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 4, Informative

    This story contains a hilarious amount of bullshit.

    --
    -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
  87. Mess with him like this. by ralphaostrander · · Score: 3, Insightful
  88. Re:brute force 63 characters? by buddyglass · · Score: 3, Informative

    OP already said he disabled WPS.

  89. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 2

    Ghost Busters!

    --
    Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  90. Pwn him with a zero day by wiredlogic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Insert a Javascript zero day into his HTTP traffic and take care of his computer. He'll never know what took him out.

    --
    I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  91. This is an attack, not a leech by Jimmy_B · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, just to be clear: this isn't leaching, this is someone doing something nefarious. If they just wanted free bandwidth, they would never set up an evil twin network. Most of the replies on this thread are bad advice assuming it's a leech. The person responsible might be nearby, but probably not; if you track down the computer that's responsible, you're likely to find that its owner doesn't know what's going on and it's been taken over by an anonymous attacker over the Internet. Or you'll find a PwnPlug.

    The first thing you need to do is notify the police that you're being targeted by hacking. This is important; if your computer/network is taken over and used for something illegal, which is likely to happen, this will protect you. Second: you need to notify your employer, as well as anyone whose confidential data you're in possession of. And third: you need to harden your computer security, and figure out why you might have been targeted.

  92. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by bcmm · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a modern network, it is.... at least at the consumer level where nobody knows how to configure a subnet manually, but if you're managing any kind of large scale network it becomes very difficult to work with static configurations on every workstation even when you know how.

    My point is that it is *incredibly* trivial to connect to a wireless router that has DHCP enabled and just use an IP address of your choosing. It's a perfectly normal thing to do if you want to be able to predictably SSH a machine or something, and even MS Windows has a GUI way of doing it. Somebody who is sniffing network traffic and cracking encryption keys can easily determine which addresses are already in use, and in practice, if you take an address at the high end of the range (e.g. 192.168.1.250), you won't run in to any trouble with other clients.

    --
    # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
    Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
  93. Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by xQx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Do a quick search online to get hold of some identity theft / credit card harvesting malware and modify it so it sends the capture to you.

    Then, setup a transparent linux proxy server that replaces any executable file downloaded with your malware, and put it between your internet connection and an open wireless network.

    Let the little turd use your free wifi internet to his heart's content, and wait for him to install the malware when he's trying to install something legitimate. Then, wait for your malware to send you the details of who he is, what his credit card numbers are etc.

    Finally, go to the local coffee shop that gives out free wifi with every coffee purchased, and drop all those details you collected on pastebin.

    Problem solved.

    1. Re:Nah, teach the little hacker about malice. by RoboRay · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's great advice. "Commit a felony to find out who's trying to leach off your WiFi." I think there are better solutions.

  94. Re:i limit my hours by Technician · · Score: 2

    Be very unreliable for them. Set up access limits and times. Many routers have a nanny mode to keep your kids off after they are supposed to be in bed.

    My printers, etc are on the wired LAN, along with my VOIP adaptor. Set up the wireless to go down a few minutes into his hacking session everyday if he attacks at the same time everyday. Hard to hack dead air.

    I set up the rule so wireless is blocked when I am in bed, or at work. Hackers may want a reliable connection. Don't provide one.

    I have spare routers. Pick up a cheap one from Goodwill or other thrift store. Power it up not connected to anything. Let them connect to a no network network instead. Monitor the connectons to it.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  95. Re:Does your router support captive portal? by demonlapin · · Score: 2

    It is a great story, though. And the guy telling it claimed to be one of the people who did it. You'll note that I never said it was true...

  96. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

    I don't quite get the problem here.

    There's an individual outside of his home, who is accessing the wifi *in* his home.

    Everyone is talking about potential countermeasures.

    What about the obvious ones?

    1) wire everything. That doesn't work so good for tablets, laptops in random places, etc.

    2) Make it so he can't connect. Reduce the power (if possible). Pick a noisy channel, so he'll get too much interference. Shield the antenna from the direction the intruder is.

    I've had to move so many access points, because people put them under desks, or with something in between Point A and B. Nope, RF doesn't pass very well through the refrigerator, filing cabinet, or the other numerous things they love to put in the way to complain. Detune it. Put the AP under the desk, so there's just enough power to reach the couch (or wherever).

    Worst case, anti-wifi wallpaper, or even the always stylish wire screen or aluminum foil.

    I vote for an all-out Faraday cage. Not only will it stop the wifi thief, but it'll keep the government mind control out... :)

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  97. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by Darinbob · · Score: 2

    Why do they need wifi at your home. Aren't they there to talk to you instead of constantly updating their facebook status?
    Maybe it's inconvenient, but security is always inconvenient. You can't have both.

  98. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by icebike · · Score: 2
    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  99. This whole topic is a gem! by anubi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This problem of WiFi leeching is far greater than one guy losing some of his bits... rather now it is wide open that WiFi is not all that secure.

    Copyright Infringement... How are the courts to assign guilt to anyone for violating copyright on the net if it can not be proven, with forum discussions like the one you are reading right now, that one is the perpetrator of internet mischief?

    The ones that should be most concerned is the MAFIAA. All the lobbying of politicians to pass their carefully crafted laws is moot if it is shown in courts of law that the wifi routers themselves are compromisable. It will be hard, if not impossible, to place without-a-doubt liability on anyone for what went through their system.

    I am sure this entire forum will be copied off and presented to the Judge as evidence that it cannot be proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that the copyright violator indeed did what the MAFIAA alleged he did.

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]

  100. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  101. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by soccerisgod · · Score: 2

    Yes, but only if done right. Use EAP-PEAP with silly passwords or even something really stupid like LEAP, and you're not any more secure. Use something like EAP-TLS with proper certificates, and then you're set.

    --
    If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
  102. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by pipatron · · Score: 2

    Frankly we need to throw the whole damned thing out and start over, design something that low power devices like smartphones and tablets can use easily while at the same time having very tough to crack security. maybe placing a hardware crypto chip on the device?

    Yeah, that was a great idea last time, until someone found a flaw in WEP and the chips weren't possible to upgrade and we had to live with virtually no security for 5 years.

    --
    c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
  103. Re:i like to limit my DHCP scope by CAIMLAS · · Score: 2

    Here here!

    I am fortunate that my house siding is cement. With the AP strategically placed in the basement, there is no signal at the sidewalk or the fence in the back yard. The next door neighbors may be able to receive the signal from their upstairs, but it's questionable.

    A basement makes an awesome 'funnel' for your wireless signal. :)

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers