Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: Protecting Home Computers From Guests?

An anonymous reader writes "We frequently have guests in our home who ask to use our computer for various reasons such as checking their email or showing us websites. We are happy to oblige, but the problem is many of these guests have high risk computing habits and have more than once infested one of our computers with malware, despite having antivirus and the usual computer security precautions. We have tried using a Linux boot CD but usually get funny looks or confused users. We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised. What tips do you have to overcome this problem, technologically or otherwise?"

365 of 572 comments (clear)

  1. Guest wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think they call it guest wifi and byod.

    1. Re:Guest wifi... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Sorry, it's broken. Burned out some bits, radiation leak, 2.8 dead."

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    2. Re:Guest wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uhhhh, a guest account with limited privileges, maybe?

    3. Re:Guest wifi... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1, Insightful

      He means by previous users. He takes no responsibility for what uses do to themselves, but doesn't necessary want them losing passwords or credit card numbers because of what the last person did.

    4. Re:Guest wifi... by chipschap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I understand your point but the problem is that many, maybe most people don't know any better. They don't even know how to take responsibility.

      I would never let a guest run Windows. I have guest accounts on a couple of Linux machines. All they get on the desktop is a browser icon or two (Firefox and Chrome). That's more than enough for anything a guest needs to do and I don't see how they can get confused.

      If they have things to do like edit documents or write papers or whatever, they probably have already brought along a laptop and they can use my network with little chance of harm (other than blatantly illegal activity). Or they can use their Google Drive account.

    5. Re:Guest wifi... by isama · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure whether it is possible to do this on a standalone pc, but on an active directory it's easy to lock a user account into a fixed state. they call it a mandatory profile. I've used it at a local community centre and it seems to work pretty good. may e it os possible to use mandatory profiles on a standalone windows box?

    6. Re:Guest wifi... by immaterial · · Score: 5, Informative

      Windows may be a problem here, but the built-in guest account on OS X is perfect for this purpose. Enable it, and guests can log in the guest account (no password), which acts like a standard user account (they have full access to the browser and any other globally-installed apps) except that at logout, the entire account is wiped clean. Since your guests don't have administrator access to your computer they can't mess up anything outside the guest account, and anything they do inside that account is automatically cleaned up for you when they're done.

    7. Re:Guest wifi... by Nerdfest · · Score: 2

      Same in Ubuntu. It's a good approach.

    8. Re:Guest wifi... by dcsmith · · Score: 1
      Absolutely the correct attitude.

      Man up, post as an anonymous coward, and criticize people who actually HAVE friends.

      Dork...

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    9. Re:Guest wifi... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 2
      what does that have to do with ipads, other than hating on apple?

      We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised.

    10. Re:Guest wifi... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      You can implement and edit "Local Computer Policy" but not on the "Home Premium" version - you need Pro or Ultimate.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
    11. Re:Guest wifi... by dukeblue219 · · Score: 1

      It's not a shot at Apple but he means having a dedicated "guest" machine also implies that it wasn't sanitized between guests, so while you're creating a machine whose security you don't care about, you're also exposing the next guest to an unknown and perhaps compromised state.

      --
      -Ted http://www.freemathhelp.com/
    12. Re:Guest wifi... by noh8rz10 · · Score: 1

      well I don't think the answer is to force someone to use a secure platform like an ipad. what if they need to run a PC program or use flash? they're your guests, after all, maybe you should cater to them a bit. although people do love ipads.

    13. Re:Guest wifi... by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Friends who respect you will take care when using your stuff. They will ask permission and they won't willingly or carelessly damage, and they will replace what they do break, and if they can't, they won't borrow it in the first place. The gp is right: today's culture doesn't teach respect of property, self, or the truth. Immediate indulgences and the expectation of entitlements are stronger social imperatives these days. Saying 'no' has become 'offensive' because no one should ever be so mean! Choosing not to share all the time, or even being choosy with whom you choose to share with is considered 'anti-social.'

    14. Re:Guest wifi... by dcsmith · · Score: 1

      I agree. The sense of entitlement we've developed as a nation (speaking for the U.S., of course, is appalling.

      --
      This has been a test. If this had been an actual Sig, you would have been amused.
    15. Re:Guest wifi... by smash · · Score: 1

      It is extremely dishonest to oneself to ignore the misuse of ones things by guests and instead ask for technical solutions. Man up and tell them 'No'

      That. The best (easiest, most familiar to end users) "technical solution" for an end user device at the moment is an iPad. If you're paranoid about the iPad itself getting owned accidentally (which I've yet to see with a corporate fleet of over 150 iOS devices) then wipe/DFU reset it between visitors.

      But a technical solution for an end user device is not the answer to your problems. EIther man up and say no, supervise what they do or install a filtering firewall on your premises

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    16. Re:Guest wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is a guest account option in Windows 8, 7, XP, etc., too. Works fine.

    17. Re:Guest wifi... by andy.ruddock · · Score: 1

      No, it's not about stuff, it's about respect.

      --
      God: An invisible friend for grown-ups.
    18. Re:Guest wifi... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Windows may be a problem here, but the built-in guest account on OS X is perfect for this purpose. Enable it, and guests can log in the guest account (no password), which acts like a standard user account (they have full access to the browser and any other globally-installed apps) except that at logout, the entire account is wiped clean. Since your guests don't have administrator access to your computer they can't mess up anything outside the guest account, and anything they do inside that account is automatically cleaned up for you when they're done.

      It's amazing how many on Slashdot seem to believe this. A system with a compromised user account can't be trusted anymore. Plenty of malware are capable of privilege escalation and infecting the system from a standard user account (plenty of malware is also perfectly happy to live and do their thing within a standard user account, but that is a different discussion, but a tangent to this as-long-as-you-don't-run-admin myth). Running a virtual machine that you kill after each use is a better approach for this problem, as many others have posted as well. It is possible to break out of, but much less likely.

    19. Re:Guest wifi... by N1AK · · Score: 1

      No; it's impolite to needlessly criticise people for something you can trivially work around anyway. If I have guests who need to access email/whatever I'm not going to refuse or breathe down their neck; nor am I going to spend ages 'teaching' them how to safely use my PC like some techno-primodonna.

      I'll either lend them an old android tablet or put them on a VM session.

    20. Re:Guest wifi... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      That's nice. Have any examples for OS X? No? OK then.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    21. Re:Guest wifi... by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

      If they "need" to access something, they should have taken care of that shit before leaving their house.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    22. Re:Guest wifi... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      Car analogy: these guests borrowed your nice shiny car, and brought it back with dents, scratches, and a busted headlamp. But they were sober and assured you that they'd kept within the speed limits, so no harm done. Do you lend them your repaired car the next time they ask?

      It's better to endure those "funny looks" than have to clean up a diseased Windows box. Give them the Linux live CD, and don't tell them the passwords for your Windows box, lest they molest it again. Who knows, they might even get to like Linux...

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    23. Re:Guest wifi... by bkcallahan · · Score: 1

      Mike, BOFH
        We had to turn off that service to comply with the CDA Bill.

    24. Re:Guest wifi... by Shirley+Marquez · · Score: 1

      Not a complete solution. They could get your computer infected with malware because of visiting a site that exploits a vulnerability in the browser, for example.

    25. Re:Guest wifi... by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, another /.er with no sense of history. People have been idealizing the past, and complaining about the present, for millenia (possibly longer, but we have no positive evidence). Jerks who think they should be able to use your stuff and not take care of it have been around for a long, long time.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    26. Re:Guest wifi... by dwywit · · Score: 1

      Best option from my point of view is to not let them use it at all - car or computer, but we'll stick with computer for now. Lots of options - 1. XP virtual machine under host Win 7. Advantage: familiar interface, no compromise to the host if the guest does something silly. Disadvantage: time spent wiping and starting from scratch. 2. LiveCD. Advantage: no compromise to the host, etc. Disadvantage: unfamiliar interface (although this alone might discourage them from even asking in the future). 3. Mandatory local policy to lock down access for the "guest" account. Advantage: very granular, no compromise to host IF it's accurately configured. Disadvantage: time and effort to configure and maintain. 4. Dedicated Linux box. similar advantages and disadvantages. 5 (bonus applicable to all options) Use OpenDNS and other tools on any platform to restrict access.

      --
      They sentenced me to twenty years of boredom
  2. Malware eh? by i_ate_god · · Score: 5, Funny

    > We are happy to oblige, but the problem is many of these guests have high risk computing habits and have more than once infested one of our computers with malware,

    Really? It's not that they started typing something into your browser and the browser history showed off all the sick and twisted porn you watch? :P

    --
    I'm god, but it's a bit of a drag really...
    1. Re:Malware eh? by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Funny

      of course not, by the time they get to the computer in the sex dungeon, they know what kind of stuff I am into.

    2. Re:Malware eh? by vargad · · Score: 2

      In that case simply creating a guest user would be sufficent, or a dedicated Firefox profile.

    3. Re:Malware eh? by batwingTM · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Guest account would be the best way... Pretty straight forward, or you could create a standard account and lock it down with AppLocker and/or local policy. Parental controls can also be useful here. Of course, you will probably need Win 7 Professional for most of this.

      All of this from an Apple user ;)

      --
      Leg Godt!
    4. Re:Malware eh? by Swampash · · Score: 3

      This article can be summed up in one sentence: "LOL WINDOWS USERS"

    5. Re:Malware eh? by fritsd · · Score: 1
      And it can be answered by a quote from Nancy Reagan: "JUST SAY NO!"

      "We have tried using a Linux boot CD but usually get funny looks or confused users."

      , my foot.
      Look into these:
      distrowatch.com search for "live cd"
      If you say to your guests "you can either play on our computer using this CD, and look funny or confused at me (or leave in disgust to go to a proper friend with Real Windows(TM) instead), or we can go play frisbee or twister or Risk", they still have the choice and you don't have the computer security problem.
      As a bonus, they may want to play frisbee or Twister or Risk with you instead of slaking their computer addiction.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    6. Re:Malware eh? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Also, every single time I've let someone use my browser session, they've immediately gone to the kill-window button when done and blown away what I was doing. Time and again, even after I explicitly told them NOT to, so I stopped letting anyone do it. OSX guest account works fine for my BIL, everyone else has brought their own device.

    7. Re:Malware eh? by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      My ex and I once accepted an invitation to stay overnight from an acquaintance couple, when we were traveling to a city a few hours away from home for other reasons. They in fact did have a sex slave living with them (padlocked chain around her neck, always sat on the floor, submissive, etc), and the room they put us up in was the sex dungeon, with a massage-type table and an anonymous but securely-locked cabinet for the paraphernalia. The wife's two sons thought the slave was the housekeeper. So the next time you watch Portlandia, know that much of what's presented is real.

  3. Linux Boot by Sylak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have a dedicated Linux boot just for them, and if they give you funny looks tell them too bad.

    1. Re:Linux Boot by lesincompetent · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ditto. A browser is always a browser. Hell you can even run chrome on linux!

    2. Re:Linux Boot by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2

      I prefer to run Linux on Chrome, myself.

    3. Re:Linux Boot by xd1936 · · Score: 1

      I was going to say, a dedicated Chrome OS boot.

    4. Re:Linux Boot by Phillip2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I've had lots of visitors in my house, of various ages, various skills levels. Most of them managed to get a browser open on linux, then it all works from there.

      Other way is to use a VM, with a snapshot, so you can just revert it when you have finished.

    5. Re:Linux Boot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You could even have it just boot straight into Firefox. No-one would even know it was Linux.

    6. Re:Linux Boot by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Have a dedicated Linux boot just for them, and if they give you funny looks tell them too bad.

      Once you have Linux, it doesn't have to be dedicated. Just use a Guest Account with permissions to use the browser, and not much else.

      The big thing is just get rid of Windows in your home. You have nothing that needs interoperability with your work that
      can't be handled by Linux. Once you dump Windows, all the bad browsing habits no longer matter.

      The problem here is the insistence of keeping Windows for no good reason.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:Linux Boot by mango9 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Our home PC runs Linux most of the time so all guests use that. Some do not know the difference between Linux and Windows anyhow... :)

    8. Re:Linux Boot by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      What about booting Chrome OS inside VirtualBox or something like that? :-) Have a special guest account that doesn't load a desktop environment but directly boots the guest OS as a sandboxed system.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    9. Re:Linux Boot by RabidReindeer · · Score: 4, Funny

      You could even have it just boot straight into Firefox. No-one would even know it was Linux.

      Just tell them that it's the new version of Windows.

      And when they decide that the GUI is all F-d up compared to what they're used to, they'll figure yup, it's a new version of Windows all right.

    10. Re:Linux Boot by Isarian · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You have nothing that needs interoperability with your work that can't be handled by Linux.

      Does that mean WINE has stopped being terrible at handling games like Path of Exile, Starcraft 2, EVE Online, etc?

    11. Re:Linux Boot by Ameryll · · Score: 2

      There are perfectly valid reasons to keep Windows around, such as playing video games. (Yes I know, you can play through Wine, but I prefer not to). Dual booting to Linux for guests, however, seems perfectly reasonable.

    12. Re:Linux Boot by BenoitRen · · Score: 2

      Once you dump Windows, all the bad browsing habits no longer matter.

      Because malware doesn't exist for Linux, right? And phishing is impossible as well?

      The problem here is the insistence of keeping Windows for no good reason.

      The fact that the question submitter didn't provide reasons for keeping Windows does not mean that (s)he doesn't have any.

    13. Re:Linux Boot by devent · · Score: 1

      KDE Looks like Windows or MacOS. You just click on the big Firefox Icon and be done with it. My mother is using my KDE/Fedora Linux laptop just fine. She is using Firefox, Office and Skype. My mother does not know anything about a computer, except how to type and how to use the mouse (and even then she confuse sometimes the mouse buttons).

      See here for an example: http://www.kde.org/announcements/4.3/

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    14. Re:Linux Boot by DragonWriter · · Score: 2

      The fact that the question submitter didn't provide reasons for keeping Windows does not mean that (s)he doesn't have any.

      In fact, the question submitter explicitly identified the reason for keeping Windows for the guest access, "funny looks and confused users" when offering Linux instead.

    15. Re:Linux Boot by icebike · · Score: 1

      Try to focus on the discussion at hand. "Admin" in the context of HOME use is a distinction without a difference, and certainly
      not germane to the problem at hand.

      Your home guests need to know how to launch a browser, and that is exactly ALL they need. They don't move in to write a thesis
      on your couch and bum time on your computer to do it.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    16. Re:Linux Boot by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

      But does it run Linux?

    17. Re:Linux Boot by hawguy · · Score: 1

      You have nothing that needs interoperability with your work that can't be handled by Linux.

      Does that mean WINE has stopped being terrible at handling games like Path of Exile, Starcraft 2, EVE Online, etc?

      What makes you think he plays games? 99.99% of people who don't play any of those games.

      Because of reading comprehension. The original post said You have nothing that needs interoperability with your work that can't be handled by Linux and he replied Does that mean WINE has stopped being terrible at handling games.

      So he's saying that the lack of games is hindering his work.

      Speaking of reading comprehension, I'm having trouble parsing this sentence 99.99% of people who don't play any of those games. People who what? Work? Use Linux? Live in the USA? Are spacemen?

    18. Re:Linux Boot by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And if you want to minimize "OS shock" there's plenty of linux distros that do a pretty fair job of mimicking a Windows interface - a different icon on the "Start" button won't confuse off too many people so long as the button is in the right place.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    19. Re:Linux Boot by viperidaenz · · Score: 4, Funny

      And when she has trouble, all she needs to do it call down to the basement.

    20. Re:Linux Boot by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      In the far worst case, you can still open the browser for them. That's what I do (since I don't use a taskbar or anything similar). It's never been an issue; firefox is pretty much the same on any OS.

    21. Re:Linux Boot by krotkruton · · Score: 1

      If my math is right, at 4.5M copies sold as of 12/2011, 0.06% of people in the world play at least Starcraft 2 (and that's assuming all 7B people in the world have a computer). So no, "99.99% of people who don't play any of those games" isn't true.

    22. Re:Linux Boot by Idbar · · Score: 2

      If you have a license already, why not use it? Use that license to run on a VM. You can run Linux on your host, and you give the guests the possibility of using a "Windows machine" which is only a VM, you can revert to a previous state once they have used it.

      The issue is not about getting rid of Windows, is knowing that you very likely paid for a license, so why not put it to use anyways?

    23. Re:Linux Boot by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      You seem to think that they only have a computer around for guests. They offered a Linux through boot CD, hence they didn't want to wipe Windows as they still wanted to use it on that computer.

    24. Re:Linux Boot by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The big thing is just get rid of Windows in your home. You have nothing that needs interoperability with your work that
      can't be handled by Linux. Once you dump Windows, all the bad browsing habits no longer matter.

      Sorry, but that's just not true. There are plenty of things that people can be working on that can't be handled by Linux. Just as there are things that people might work on that can't be handled by Windows. Come on people, a computer is a tool, not a religion.

    25. Re:Linux Boot by devent · · Score: 2

      I live in my own apartment with my wife and baby. My wife is using KDE Fedora/Linux just fine, too.
      As I say, modern Linux is just like Windows, IMHO is KDE/Linux way easier to use then any Windows.

      --
      http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    26. Re:Linux Boot by rat7307 · · Score: 1

      EVE runs great under Wine on my modestly powered Linux box.

      --
      Burma?
    27. Re:Linux Boot by dbIII · · Score: 1

      A funny thing is I've got people on MS Win7 using wine on a linux box (via X and ssh) to run an old copy of AutoCAD LT they like (without ribbons or whatever shit it has now) because it won't run on MS Win7. For things like that I sometimes wish there was a version of wine ported to MS Windows.
      Yes I know about virtual machines, but some people just want to be able to click on an icon and run the application on their screen instead of getting the unwieldy experience of an entire separate desktop from Virtualbox or VNC. They were doing that before and frequently bitched about it.

    28. Re:Linux Boot by jatoo · · Score: 1

      Can that Linux run Chrome?

    29. Re:Linux Boot by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

      And when they decide that the GUI is all F-d up compared to what they're used to, they'll figure yup, it's a new version of Windows all right.

      *sigh* Yet another way Linux is mimicking Microsoft...

      --
      I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
    30. Re:Linux Boot by julesh · · Score: 1

      If my math is right, at 4.5M copies sold as of 12/2011, 0.06% of people in the world play at least Starcraft 2 (and that's assuming all 7B people in the world have a computer). So no, "99.99% of people who don't play any of those games" isn't true.

      Not to mention the fact that at least 3 times that many have probably pirated it.

    31. Re:Linux Boot by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      Have a dedicated Linux boot just for them, and if they give you funny looks tell them too bad.

      I don't get the "funny looks" comment at all. We don't have a Windows machine in the house - mostly we have Linux machines (running Gnome 3), although there are a couple of Macbooks. If someone wants to borrow a machine then they get either Linux (most common) or OS X (less common) and no one has expressed any "funny looks". Notably, no one seems to have any problems driving Gnome 3, even though they've almost certainly never used it before...

    32. Re:Linux Boot by FireFury03 · · Score: 1

      The fact that the question submitter didn't provide reasons for keeping Windows does not mean that (s)he doesn't have any.

      In fact, the question submitter explicitly identified the reason for keeping Windows for the guest access, "funny looks and confused users" when offering Linux instead.

      Is Firefox on Linux somehow more confusing that Firefox on Windows?

    33. Re:Linux Boot by icebike · · Score: 1

      what does that have to do with setting up a computer in your home for guests to use?

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    34. Re:Linux Boot by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Or it means that WINE will handle various CAD programs as well as the in-house MFC-based system we've got? I don't care about MS Office, I hardly touch it at work. I do care about stuff that is often graphics-intensive, lots of computations, and was written only for MS Windows.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    35. Re:Linux Boot by SkimTony · · Score: 1

      Come on people, a computer is a tool, not a religion.

      I see your six-digit UID, so you can't be that new to slashdot. I appreciate your optimism, though.

    36. Re:Linux Boot by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Yeah... yeah... sigh.

      Though it's always been my opinion that computers are no more religion than toasters, or, well honestly, religions, I think I have realized it even more after buying my first Apple computer since 1985 this year - and really liking it. Been a Linux user since 1993 (doing VLSI design in my dorm room with X11 to a remote client) and a Windows user since they made the first game for it (though the lines were blurred since I was playing DOS games way before that). And in the last 5 years I have developed software for all of those OSes (and more) that combined is enjoyed by several million people. Which in the end is what really matters.

  4. EZ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Don't let them use your computers. Done.

  5. Chromebook maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Guest chromebook seems like one good option -- probably rather harder to compromise, and lets guests surf/etc...

  6. Virtual Machine by FiveLights · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Set up a VM in Virtual Box for them to use. Take a snapshot of when it was healthy and new and just revert to that each time someone wants to use it. Even paying for a Windows install for the VM would be cheaper than an iPad.

    1. Re:Virtual Machine by Raven42rac · · Score: 1

      Windows Steadystate used to do a decent job of this on XP.

      --
      I hate sigs.
    2. Re:Virtual Machine by Saethan · · Score: 1

      Set up a VM in Virtual Box for them to use. Take a snapshot of when it was healthy and new and just revert to that each time someone wants to use it. Even paying for a Windows install for the VM would be cheaper than an iPad.

      I'd mod this up if I had points, it was going to be my suggestion. Really, though, the best option has been mentioned elsewhere - give 'em access to your wifi and tell them to bring their own damn computers. :P

    3. Re:Virtual Machine by Erioll · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. Fullscreen the VM, and they'll probably never even know that they weren't using your "actual" PC.

    4. Re:Virtual Machine by freedom_surfer · · Score: 2

      Agreed. You can also run the machine in a non-persistence mode so that nothing is written to the disk at all while in use. Just periodically fire it up in a persistent state to apply important security updates etc for their safety. Unless they are savvy they won't even know they are running in a VM.

    5. Re:Virtual Machine by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Windows Steadystate used to do a decent job of this on XP.

      Which, for some reason that probably had nothing to do with pushing AD and group-policy tinkering on a bunch of schools and libraries and other relatively unsophisticated organizational users, is why Microsoft killed it. Support ended a couple of years back, availability 3-ish. No 64-bit or Win7 compatible version ever existed.

    6. Re:Virtual Machine by Pluvius · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you have Windows 7 Pro or greater, you can get an instance of XP running on Virtual PC for free. It's called "Windows XP Mode."

      Rob

    7. Re:Virtual Machine by steveg · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why go to all the trouble of reverting the snapshot?

      Just set the disk to "non-persistent" and nothing they do will modify the system. Each time the VM is restarted it's back to its default state.

      I don't have any experience with VirtualBox, but with VMware include a line something like this in the .vmx file:

      ide0:0.mode = "independent-nonpersistent"

      When you want to make changes, shut down the VM and change that line to:

      ide0:0.mode = "persistent"

      then change it back when it's the way you want it.

      I'm sure VirtualBox has something similar.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    8. Re:Virtual Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Windows Steady State for 7 is a do it yourself through Windows 7 tools matter. http://www.microsoft.com/en-us/download/details.aspx?id=24373

    9. Re:virtual machine by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yea, that won't get tedious at all!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    10. Re:Virtual Machine by mlts · · Score: 2

      I actually bothered with a license for DeepFreeze for the one box that I allow guests to use. That, a Kensington lock, BitLocker and proper password protection of the BIOS and the HDD is good enough.

      That way, the DeepFreeze-protected machine is one reboot away from getting cleaned up from whatever ails it. Especially with the fact that the guest user has no administrator rights, so malware would have to find a hole to get to a Windows admin context, then find a way to attack the DeepFreeze driver in order to stay on the box.

    11. Re:Virtual Machine by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      I periodically use clonezilla to make an image of my machines so that if something goes wrong, I can get back to my fully configured state quickly. The one problem I had when I tried to use it as a 'always revert to a known state' computer is that every time it reverts, all of the updates have to be reinstalled. I would think that a restoration of the frozen image, an update install, and then a reimage would make this less tedious if it was automated.

      Does DeepFreeze do this? Or, do you go back to your unpatched state every time the system restores?

    12. Re:Virtual Machine by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      For bonus points, do this on your HTPC.

      Not that my computer is ever used by people I wouldn't trust...but the most common device I let someone use when they have a quick "can I borrow a computer do do something/print something" is my HTPC. It has a wireless mouse and keyboard (so its not like they are interacting from the lenovo mini-keyboard/remote) and it is connected to my network printer. They are unlikely to partake in any funny business because everything they are doing is happening on a TV-sized screen (with some UI elements magnified for couch-readability) in the middle of the living room.

      And even if they did mess something up outside of the VM, its just an HTPC. Few programs installed besides XBMC and a browser, and the only local media are video files that have been downloaded for one-time viewing that I haven't gotten around to deleting...everything important is accessed from a backed up location on the network.

      --
      Bottles.
    13. Re:Virtual Machine by mlts · · Score: 1

      You can "thaw" DeepFreeze protected volumes so when you do patches, they stay in place.

    14. Re:Virtual Machine by dissy · · Score: 4, Informative

      For VirtualBox, the method I use is slightly different but gives similar results in the end.
      This must be done from the command line with the vboxmanage.exe tool, I'm not aware of a GUI way to do it.

      I have a 'template' VM with fully setup windows and configured how I want it.
      Then I make a new 'guest' VM (from scratch) and copy the template disk image to a new name (cloned, from virtual media manager), from template.vdi to guestbox.vdi, and then I use a command line tool to set the new disk image immutable, so it can not be changed again.

      vboxmanage modifyhd whereever/guestbox.vdi --type immutable

      Then point the guest vm to the guestbox.vdi image under settings -> storage.

      Each time the VM boots, disk writes go into a seperate copy-on-write file, which gets deleted once the VM is powered down. A "revert" action takes as long as a delete command unlinking an inode.

      When I need to make updates, I do that in my template vm, then copy over the vdi setting it immutable again. Copy the new guest image over the old one, and the VM is updated.

    15. Re:Virtual Machine by TheNastyInThePasty · · Score: 1

      I was going to suggest this same thing. It's easy, it's safe, and if you use windows on it, it's familiar. There's no down side really.

      --
      The best thing about UDP jokes is I don't care if you get them or not
    16. Re:Virtual Machine by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      There is no automatic [Thaw --> Windows Update --> Refreeze] in the middle of the night function? That would make the difference between being a convenience and a chore for me.

    17. Re:Virtual Machine by mlts · · Score: 1

      You can script it so the machine reboots (to clean the gunk off), updates, then reboots back frozen. You can also script it to grab updates and move them to a non-frozen partition, reboot, suck 'em in, then boot back locked down.

    18. Re:Virtual Machine by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Nice. I haven't looked at DeepFreeze in a lot of years. It may be time to take a look again. Thanks.

    19. Re:Virtual Machine by karnal · · Score: 1

      If it was automated, couldn't a virus just hook into that?

      --
      Karnal
    20. Re:Virtual Machine by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Why could it? If it resets to a clean install and does the Windows updates before refreezing, any virus that could infect the machine is going to be infected when the user turns it on anyway.

    21. Re:Virtual Machine by ferret4 · · Score: 2

      and if the VM is running Windows XP with IE6, it'll be just like using their own computer at home.

    22. Re:Virtual Machine by julesh · · Score: 1

      Or alternatively, you can do Machine/Take Snapshot from the GUI, then revert to the snapshot when the machine gets fubar'd. This means people don't unexpectedly lose stuff if they try saving things, and only requires a few moments of intervention periodically.

      I've also done intersting stuff along the lines you talk about with VMware (I think it would also be possible with VirtualBox), where I set up a .vmdk file that uses another vmdk as a reference, and only stores the blocks that are changed. So you can have several virtual machines all with common data but without wasting disk space by duplicating it. Unfortunately, it all gets a little fucked up if you try to modify the base image, but it works well enough if you have a static base you can work from.

  7. Locked up in a safe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guests, that is.

  8. Emulators/Virtualization by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    You can set up a PC image with your favorite virtualization system, then run that full screen and have guests use it. They get an environment they're familiar with and you can have the emulator set up not to save any changes to the hard drive image it's running from, so when they leave you can reset it and get back to a known safe state.

  9. NoScript by MetalliQaZ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's a Firefox addon. Check it out. Also Adblock Plus. With those two installed and running, things get a lot safer. Of course, NoScript requires a bit of savvy to be able to browse the web correctly. You might have to help. Otherwise, tell them to bring their own darn laptop.

    --
    "Here Lies Philip J. Fry, named for his uncle, to carry on his spirit"
    1. Re:NoScript by hyades1 · · Score: 2

      I use and LOVE both of those add-ons. Ghostery is also good, and it shows what's tracking you even if you choose not to block them.

      --
      I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
    2. Re:NoScript by acariquara · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except that NoScript does not protect anyone from downloading "hi_I_saw_you_wanna_fuck.jpg.scr.pif.exe.bat.com"

      --
      Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
    3. Re:NoScript by Ameryll · · Score: 1

      I love NoScript but I find it causes too much confusion for people using my computer. Some email services don't handle being loaded through NoScript well (which I would say is a sign of a badly written email page people shouldn't be using but I can't dictate what email services my friends use...)

    4. Re:NoScript by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      In my experience, even tech types who understand security risks don't like to use NoScript. It makes browsing a bit of a chore. (I use it religiously and Chrome's failure to fully support a similar add-on is one of the reasons I don't use it.) I would think that if the guests have issues with browsing with Linux, then NoScript would be unacceptable.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    5. Re:NoScript by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      I've tried and abandoned the use of noscript twice. There's just too much (legitimate) out there that doesn't work with it turned on. For the cost of the time wasted while trying to use it as security I can just throw away my PC every time it gets infected.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    6. Re:NoScript by MyFirstNameIsPaul · · Score: 1

      It definitely takes some getting used to. After having used it for so many years, it doesn't add any measurable time to my browsing any more.

      --

      I once took an excursion to Reddit, and later HN. Unlimited up/down voting sucks when dealing with a hive-mind.

    7. Re:NoScript by tftp · · Score: 1

      I've tried and abandoned the use of noscript twice. There's just too much (legitimate) out there that doesn't work with it turned on.

      I use NoScript and it works great. However I have Chrome and IE also installed, and I use them when I buy something. The Firefox install is for casual browsing, and it is very safe. But if a reasonably trusted site that I need asks for too many items unblocked, I just use Chrome.

  10. Seriously? by morcego · · Score: 4, Funny

    The moment your computer becomes public (however limited that "public" is), it is a goner. It is like asking how to secure your computer after it was compromised.

    I don't even let my visitor plug into the same network my main computers are, and have both a separated WiFi network and a separated ethernet segment for them (1 port only in the guest room), that I treat as a DMZ. Ok, I'm paranoid, but still.

    Maybe use removable HDs, and keep one for your own use, and swap it for an entirely different one (which you can restore from a Ghost image or something) for your guests. As in PHYSICALLY disconnecting your HDs when they are going to use.

    Otherwise, it is like using band-aids to stop a leaking dam.

    --
    morcego
    1. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't even tell people where I live.

    2. Re:Seriously? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2

      I don't even let my visitor plug into the same network my main computers are, and have both a separated WiFi network and a separated ethernet segment for them (1 port only in the guest room), that I treat as a DMZ. Ok, I'm paranoid, but still.

      I shudder to think what booby traps you set up to keep your house guests away from your silverware and jewelry.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    3. Re:Seriously? by xaxa · · Score: 2

      What kind of guests do you have? Why do they spend so long using the Internet that managing it becomes an issue?

      My flatmate is from a different country, and regularly has friends visiting. They often ask to print a ticket or boarding pass, check email, check Facebook, but it's never been a problem. They can log in as guest on any computer, and the wifi password is on a post-it by the router.

    4. Re:Seriously? by morcego · · Score: 1

      I shudder to think what booby traps you set up to keep your house guests away from your silverware and jewelry.

      You assume I care about those things as much as I care about my data. I don't :)

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Dutch here. You shouldn't use band-aids to stop a leaking dam. You should plug it with your finger.

    6. Re:Seriously? by QRDeNameland · · Score: 1

      Actually, I was assuming that you need to cultivate a better class of house guest. ;-)

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    7. Re:Seriously? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I thought someone would complain about "We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised". They are asserting that the locked down iOS is less secure than Windows. And scrolling down so far, I haven't seen a single objection. Personally, my house is BYOD-only. And the one time someone took me up on that, I turned off my WiFi devices and turned off encryption.

    8. Re:Seriously? by cnaumann · · Score: 2

      I don't even let guests use the same internet.

    9. Re:Seriously? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      I'd say they are only asserting that malware actually exists on some Apple stuff now instead of being the MS only nightmare of the last decade. Murphy's law may find it even if it's rare.

    10. Re:Seriously? by jatoo · · Score: 1

      It drives my wife crazy, but I just can't afford the security risk of letting her in the house.

    11. Re:Seriously? by Tom · · Score: 1

      The moment your computer becomes public (however limited that "public" is), it is a goner. It is like asking how to secure your computer after it was compromised.

      That's bullshit and you are paranoid.

      Multi-user systems were originally designed in a time where people simply didn't have their own computer. Seperating users from each other and from the system is pretty much what they were designed to do.

      Now if we talk about windows, the game changes because it was originally (DOS times) designed as a single-user system, much like the old Mac OS. But in 2013 I would assume everyone is either running some Unix (i.e. Linux, OS X or some BSD) or some windows NT-relative. (with NT being basically the bastard child of OS/2 and VMS, I'd consider it a multi-user system even though I've not seen the source).

      Now in the most paranoid of worlds, someone with physical access to your computer for a long enough time can certainly compromise it. If you have friends like that, you need new friends. (I have enough friends who could do it, but wouldn't, and that's the important part - if your friendship isn't based on trust, then why are you friends?)

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    12. Re:Seriously? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      But every other platform has also been compromised. So the restriction seems to be solely a jab at Apple, and not based on any actual "protection" of anyone.

    13. Re:Seriously? by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      The moment your computer becomes public (however limited that "public" is), it is a goner. It is like asking how to secure your computer after it was compromised.

      Exactly.

      When I was a more sociable chap a few years ago I had an easy solution to this. I put an old PC in my living room that anyone could use. It ran windows so anybody could use it, and I never used it for anything important. I only used it for playing movies as it was connected to my TV and they were all streamed of a web site on my main Linux PC in my bedroom.

      If it got infected with malware (which it did, many times) I never really cared since most of the people who used it were too cheap to buy their own PC. I would try and keep it clear of malware and would remove anything when I noticed it was infected but I generally took the opinion that the people using the PC knew it was public so should be very careful about it anyway (this was in the day when people used internet cafes so were used to this).

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    14. Re:Seriously? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I shudder to think what booby traps you set up to keep your house guests away from your silverware and jewelry.

      It's not a problem: he sold off all that stuff to pay for networking hardware.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  11. Virtual Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Something like VirtualBox or VMWare that supports snapshots. Install an OS into the virtual machine and set some firewall rules to keep it from accessing anything else on your network. When they ask to use your computer, launch the virtual machine and set it to full screen. They won't know the difference. When they're done, revert to snapshot.

  12. Easy - Virtualize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Install a freeware (or not if you prefer) virtualization application, create a non-persistent snapshot, and when the guest needs it, boot it an make full screen.

    When they leave, revert to the pristine state, and store until needed again.

    Seems fairly easy, and ensures you lose any crud they pick up in their IntarWebz(tm) travels.

  13. Chromebook? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sound like a good use for a Chromebook.

    1. Re:Chromebook? by DeDmeTe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Amen to that. That's what friends and the kid's friends get handed when they ask to "check their email and Facebook". It works.

      --
      -Guns kill people like spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat-
    2. Re:Chromebook? by aklinux · · Score: 1

      I 2nd this. They already have a "guest" setup that I don't think saves anything unless they log into a (their own?) gmail account, then it saves it there...

    3. Re:Chromebook? by bradvoy · · Score: 1

      I have a nephew who has very poor judgement. The first time he asked to use one of our computers to check Facebook and his email I was very concerned that he would download malware. Then I remembered the Chromebook and handed it to him. Problem solved. It let him do everything he wanted to do and prevented him from causing any problems. Now every time he comes over he asks if he can borrow "that cool laptop that goes directly to the browser".

    4. Re:Chromebook? by troutdun · · Score: 1

      This is an outstanding use for a Chromebook. Has built in guest mode and while any computing device is subject to malware compromise, a Chromebook is *much* less susceptible. Also, very affordable. I'm typing this on my $249 Chromebook. I've been using Chrome OS devices for nearly a year now, and as long as you understand what it is and what it's not, you'll be happy...

  14. virtual machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Set up a new virtual machine (KVM say) when the guest comes, so it's like they're using a brand new installation (Windoze if you must). When they're done, wipe the container, and set up another one next time you need it. Or even keep a spare hard drive around for a non-virtualized PC. Reformat it completely and install OS on it for each visit.

  15. Re:Locked down guest account? by kilfarsnar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Seconded. I say locked down guest account, or live CD. The VM idea isn't bad either.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  16. VirtualBox by whtmarker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Setup a windows XP virtual machine. Save a snapshot, or a VDI/VMDK file of a clean hard drive image. When they come, boot up the virtual machine in full screen. When they leave, restore the clean snapshot or clean hard drive image.

    1. Re:VirtualBox by sexconker · · Score: 1

      I do this for ISP techs, too. Bridge the ethernet adapter, install Windows of some variety in a virtual machine. (Don't even bother activating or updating it, it's going away as soon as they leave.) Most of them don't give a crap that they're installing in a virtual machine if they even notice at all. Just stand around and shoo them away when the host OS's interface pops up briefly during the reboot process.

      Why in the fuck would an ISP tech need to install anything on your computer?

    2. Re:VirtualBox by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Retarded routers.

      My installation tech wanted to do something similar. Instead I just browsed to it, guessed the password, and got a confused/shocked/impressed look when I was able to do what the "tool" does, faster, and without installing anything.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    3. Re:VirtualBox by naturaverl · · Score: 1

      Um, well, because that's their job? Remember that the ISP tech is, well, a tech, and they're just following a script given to them by their manager at the ISP. I agree that it shouldn't be necessary, but I've had ISPs in the past tell me that they NEED a windows computer in the household from which can install their "internet software". Uh, sure... was my response, even though I don't have a single windows machine. As previously suggested, I gave him a virtualbox running Windows XP and he went ahead and installed Norton and some other garbage on it. After he left I nuked the VM & I am still up and running, years later.

  17. Know what I'd do. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Get smarter guests

    1. Re:Know what I'd do. . . by Sez+Zero · · Score: 1

      Get smarter guests

      Exactly.

      "Hey, can I use your computer to..."

      "No."

      Who doesn't have a smartphone/tablet these days to do such things?!

    2. Re:Know what I'd do. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "Hey, can I use your computer to..."

      Print my boarding pass?

    3. Re:Know what I'd do. . . by spasm · · Score: 1

      Dunno why this is marked 'funny'. 'Informative' is more like it.

    4. Re:Know what I'd do. . . by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      Get smarter guests

      Wouldn't do any good if they're intentionally infecting the machine as part of a "smart" scheme.

    5. Re:Know what I'd do. . . by fritsd · · Score: 1

      It's actually quite enjoyable printing your visiting mother-in-law's boarding pass together.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  18. Just sandbox them by Zarhan · · Score: 1

    Just create an ad-hoc guest account with limited rights. That way they can't really screw up things. Once the guest has left the premises, remove the account. You don't even have to log out yourself if someone just needs the access for five minutes, just switch users.

    A step further: Build a virtual machine with a e.g. your basic Linux distro or Windows XP, create a snapshot of it in it's "fresh" state, and set it up to talk only directly to the Internet without any access to your local network. You can achieve this with Virtualbox at least. Let your guest access the virtual machine. When the guest leaves, just revert it to the snapshot state.

    1. Re:Just sandbox them by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      The guest account is the way to go. Anything that infects the PC is unlikely to make it past the guest account as long as you keep your Windows Updates up-to-date. I would also recommend going the extra step and setting ACLs to deny usage of Internet Explorer. Install Firefox and/or Chrome.

  19. A VM should do the trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's trivial nowadays to get an OS running on a VM. You can easily backup the virtual drive as well, so that restoring it to its clean state is equally as easy.

  20. Use two routers. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    Use two routers. The turn wi-fi on both. Give the password to the outer router to your guests and ask them to BYOC, bring your own computers. Use the second router, the inner one, to run your home network. Close all the ports and be very secure on the second router. Tell your guests your PC has a virus and so you don't want others connecting to it or using it till you get some help to disinfect it.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Use two routers. by tepples · · Score: 1

      ask them to BYOC, bring your own computers. [...] Tell your guests your PC has a virus and so you don't want others connecting to it or using it till you get some help to disinfect it.

      "I don't own a smartphone, tablet, or laptop computer. The computer I normally use is a desktop computer at my house, and my phone only does talk and text. But I did bring a boot CD with antivirus software. Now may I use this antivirus disc on your PC?" What would be your polite reply?

    2. Re:Use two routers. by muridae · · Score: 1

      One router, dual radio if you really must, with wireless isolation. The wireless devices can only talk to the router to handle DHCP and DNS, the rest is blocked by default; they can't even access the wired network. Not even a fancy feature, it came built in to the $50 netgear block I picked up. If you really do want an open home wifi (unless it's RADIUS encrypted the password is not that hard to get), then dual radios. One SSID for your network, isolation turned off. Heck, put it on 5GHz, most computer illiterate guests won't have 11n cards. Then leave a guest SSID as open as you like, bit rate limited, and with isolation turned on.

    3. Re:Use two routers. by fritsd · · Score: 1

      My reply would be no. Because that would be like giving not my trusted guests, but some unknown "boot CD with antivirus software" author, physical access to my computer.
      Maybe on a spare computer that gets re-installed from CD afterwards and with the other computers' Shorewall configured to "don't listen to anything the potentially evil guest computer says".

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  21. Boot to the guest account by AlphaBit · · Score: 5, Informative

    The media PC in my living room boots directly into the Guest account. Under the guest account I can USE almost all the programs I have installed seamlessly. There are some minor issues with software updates, XBOX controllers, and a complete inability to configure network settings, but that's about it. If I need to do anything that requires more rights I can deal with the UAC prompts that show up or simply log out and back in as an admin.

    I know it's not flawless but I still feel pretty comfortable letting my tech savvy (e.g. dangerous) friends stay over unattended. It wouldn't hold up to anyone seriously determined to break the security but they have access to the physical machine and can't really be stopped anyway.

    1. Re:Boot to the guest account by AlphaBit · · Score: 1

      I agree that a VM is the best solution IF you can keep a user in the VM. The VM software that I've used in the past puts the host machine a click away. A Guest account isn't perfect, but it's pretty easy and gives you some lower level protection. It also means that I don't have to do anything strange or special when I let other people use the machine. They use it in the same mode that I use it. The browsers themselves will still be pretty vulnerable to bad plugins but I run a virus scanner which helps.

      A Guest account in Guest Mode would have been nice, but they took that feature away in the release.

    2. Re:Boot to the guest account by AlphaBit · · Score: 1

      And the Guest account means I can let my friends game on the machine. Try running BF3 in a VM.

    3. Re:Boot to the guest account by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      Can't you at least secure that damn guest account?
      No execution right in the Windows equivalent of the /home/guest folders, or web browser that refuses to download executables, have all your windows updates and other patching done. UAC configured to not let user execute "TrojanFakeVLCsetup.exe" and "WatchLotsaPorn.exe" just by clicking "Yes" on the UAC prompt?

      It's all too weird that a guest user account can't be secured. If it's so dire, even you and I shouldn't be using it at all, let alone guests.

    4. Re:Boot to the guest account by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

      I let guests use the default Windows Guest account. I'm sure it's not perfect, but no problems so far, and we have crowds of nieces and nephews living at our house every summer. I do like the idea of a VM, maybe this summer....

      --
      Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  22. re computer by JohnVanVliet · · Score: 1

    Just install Linux -- like Mint or Fuduntu
    http://www.linuxmint.com/
    http://www.fuduntu.org/

    set up a restricted "guest" account
    with chrome and Firefox on the desktop

    problem solved

    --
    "I don't pitch OpenSUSE Linux to my friends, i let Microsoft do it for me
    1. Re:re computer by Loki_666 · · Score: 1

      Haha, i've never heard of Funduntu before. Sounds like what you would get if you mixed Microsoft with Ubuntu... FUDunutu.

  23. Just say no by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most of the new WiFi routers offer guest networks. Set one up and tell them to bring their own device. With the number of people with smartphones, I don't really see a legitimate need to set up guest computers.

    --
    These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    1. Re:Just say no by Hatta · · Score: 2

      Yes, and if your guests want cake you should let them eat cake.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Just say no by 0racle · · Score: 1

      This is my solution. No one other then myself uses my computers.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  24. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 3, Informative

    >> Have a dedicated Linux boot just for them, and if they give you funny looks tell them too bad.

    This. As long as you can PRINT from it. (Most of the time I loaned "local" computer access it was to let someone print airline boarding passes.)

    Also make a couple paper copies of your WiFi creds and encourage them to BYOD.

  25. Obvious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have a multi-tier network, with multiple nested NAT/Firewall layers. (One NAT/Firewall/Router connects as a client to another.) Bonus points for DD-WRT with the SPI firewall enabled. The idea is, your guest talks to your broadband network, but not to your other computers who are all hiding behind a NAT/Firewall/Router. Thus, when the guest is compromised, it doesn't create a wormhole into your private network.

    Second, get a cheap windows box (is there such a thing?). Get a Linux boot disk. I use an old Fedora install disk and boot into rescue mode. Get an external harddrive. Run ntfsclone. Make a mirror copy of the windows computer's disks. Restore back after the guest leaves. It's, like, trivial....

    Alternative: Buy a chromebook. Tell them it's the latest fad. (It is!) Problem solved.

  26. "may have been compromised" by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    "it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised."

    Then why are you letting them use ANY computer? There is no platform where you can say 100% that it has not been compromised.

    By far the iPad would be the least likely to be infected by anything, and require the least maintenance. I can't understand your rationale for not going this route at all.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:"may have been compromised" by Ksevio · · Score: 1
      The full quote is :

      We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised.

      Is he really worried about an iPad being compromised compared to a windows box? It's pretty hard to accidentally mess up an iPad even visiting shady sites.

  27. Sorry, No. by primebase · · Score: 1

    Really? If their Web habits are ~that~ sketchy then you don't even want them using your Internet connection. Seriously! They could be downloading copyrighted material or even worse things that you don't want anywhere near your ISPs records.

    Tell them no, and make them bring their own damn 3G/4G device hooked to an account that they own if they simply must access the net while they're hanging out.

  28. Re:Locked down guest account? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    And put it in its own separate guest network, which is logically isolated from your own stuff by a firewall, maybe run a print server too (people often want to print boarding passes)...
    As for funny looks, a browser is a browser and i've never had any problems giving someone a linux livecd, it has both firefox and chrome and most people are perfectly familiar with these applications.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  29. Fon Hotspot by samjam · · Score: 1

    I have a cheap fon router which provides two wireless networks. One for my family and one non-encrypted.

    The non-encrypted network normally requires a logon, but some IP addresses can be excluded from that requirement. You might choose to exclude all requirements so that your guests get straight access.

    You also get to rate-limit the connection too.

    If you run a connection and leave it turned on you get free logon to other peoples fon hotspots too - and there are thousands in the UK.

    http://corp.fon.com/how-it-works

  30. Stop using Windows by guruevi · · Score: 1

    Just use a Linux distro - problems solved. Create a guest account that automatically wipes every time you log out.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  31. Tell them no by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    No one touches my computing equipment, period. If you MUST use my machine you are getting a Linux Live Cd. If you dont like, it, use someone else's resources.

    --
    Good-bye
  32. Re:Virtual Machines by gagol · · Score: 1

    This!

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  33. Obvious answer by jamesl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... many of these guests have high risk computing habits and have more than once infested one of our computers with malware ...

    Change a few words ... many of these guests have high risk driving habits and have more than once driven one of our cars into a phone pole ... and the answer is obvious.

    Not convinced? Try this one ...
    ... many of these guests have high risk sexual behavior habits and have more than once infected one or more of our girl/boy friends ...

  34. Easy by PPH · · Score: 1

    Anyone who stays at my house has to help slop the hogs and clean out the barn. You can play with the computer afterward.

    Problem solved.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. Linux PC running VirtualBox fullscreen by steveha · · Score: 1

    With Windows inside the VirtualBox. Once the guests leave, revert the VirtualBox image.

    With a little work, you can make a "guest" login that launches VirtualBox and can't do anything else.

    On the other hand, it might be enough to make a "guest" account, and just run a script that cleans out /home/guest after the users leave:

    # remove all trace of guest directory
    rm -fr /home/guest
    # set up clean copy again
    cp -pr /whatever/guest /home

    If you are using Linux Mint with MATE, your guests should be able to cope with the desktop. If you are using an "improved" desktop like GNOME Shell or Ubuntu Unity, stick with the VirtualBox running Windows.

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    1. Re:Linux PC running VirtualBox fullscreen by cowtamer · · Score: 1

      mod parent up!

  36. Act just as though it was a user at the office by adam525 · · Score: 1

    I would go even a step further than my subject line suggests and create a guest account and lock it down as much as you can. Turn off all the browser features as well.

    A guest shouldn't be doing anything except for browsing the web and checking web based email. Turning the browsers security settings on "high" (which would generally mean disabling scripting, cookies, etc) will keep them from doing too much there.

    Also, as I said above, let them use the guest account and lock it down tight. You didn't mention which version of Windows you are running, but if it's fairly new you could use the Local Security Policy MMC and prevent them from running applications.

    This on top of your standard AV and the other precautions that I'm assuming you are talking about should do it.

  37. Two words: by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Virtual machine.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
  38. Adjust priviledges? by Kimomaru · · Score: 1

    You may want to do some very light reading on priviledges for your platform of choice. Install your OS, create a guest account and set up the desktop with a browser and some apps that might be needed, then dial back the access so thatt he guest account can't install anything. That's all there is to it. If they complain, throw them out of the house.

  39. Re:Hey, I'm lazy too! by gagol · · Score: 4, Informative

    Solutions evolve with time, in order for Google to index relevant pages, we have to create content. That is happening as we speak!

    --
    Tomorrow is another day...
  40. iPad by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    "We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised."

    Seriously? What have you been reading that gives you bizarre notions like that? The iPad has a number of general shortcomings, most of which are related to its single-user OS and its closed architecture. And I'd hesitate to lend a guest my iPad, but only because – once unlocked for use – it's wide open for the user to poke around (e.g. read my mail, browser history, etc). But in terms of the OS being compromised, an iOS device that hasn't been deliberately jailbroken (by you) is about as safe an internet-access device as you're likely to find, short of custom building a Linux- or BSD-based system yourself.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:iPad by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Compromised in the sense that Apple does a certain amount of data collection/spying and limits what you can do with it. To be fair unless you install Cyanogen then Android does allow Google to collect some data as well.

      It's a very responsible attitude. Guests didn't click "I agree" to the privacy violations and you can't expect them to research all that stuff when visiting. You should do them a favor and set them up with a more respectful OS, just like you wouldn't immediately open up the browser after they left and see if they forgot to log out of their email account.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re:iPad by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Compromised in the sense that Apple does a certain amount of data collection/spying and limits what you can do with it. To be fair unless you install Cyanogen then Android does allow Google to collect some data as well.

      It's a very responsible attitude. Guests didn't click "I agree" to the privacy violations and you can't expect them to research all that stuff when visiting. You should do them a favor and set them up with a more respectful OS, just like you wouldn't immediately open up the browser after they left and see if they forgot to log out of their email account.

      Most guests don't care. And if they're asking to borrow your computer/tablet/whatever they really don't give a damn.

      Honestly, I see that as a bullshit excuse - if you don't want them to use your computers or provide them a means for them to do their internet stuff, then don't. Just. Say. No. They can provide their own devices.

      If they really cared about privacy, they wouldn't ask you in the first place! I mean, you could very legitimately have installed a keylogger on the PC you're providing them, and they obviously don't care that you know their email password or other thing because of it.

      To be honest, most guests asking will probably think you're nuts if you give them that excuse, and if you go onto a tirade about walled gardens, you'll find their eyes glaze over. Hell, if they have an Android, they'd probably install apps without caring about permissions (you can bet most Android users do).

    3. Re:iPad by Bogtha · · Score: 1

      It's a very responsible attitude. Guests didn't click "I agree" to the privacy violations and you can't expect them to research all that stuff when visiting. You should do them a favor and set them up with a more respectful OS

      Your ISP probably has privacy clauses in their terms of service. Do you make your guests read and agree to them, or is it only an issue when they use an OS you don't approve of?

      --
      Bogtha Bogtha Bogtha
    4. Re:iPad by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      That's not what I've found. Apple discontinued support for iPad 1 less than 2 years after releasing it, meaning no iOS6 update, after disclosing 197 security vulnerabilities fixed as part of the iOS6 release.

      This tells me one thing: If you want something safe that's going to last you more than a couple of years, don't buy an iPad.

    5. Re:iPad by Tarmas · · Score: 1

      This. Plus iOS has pretty decent restriction policies you can set up on the device itself or through external PC applications like the Apple Configurator, though for whatever reason these features are marketed towards business and education users, so no average Joe knows about them.

      --
      Signature has left the building.
    6. Re:iPad by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Don't let them use Chrome either then. Automatic data collection sent to google.

      As administrator on the machine you can turn it off? Well, you can turn off most of the data collection in iOS too. And even if you cranked up privacy settings in Chrome, do you trust Google with your search or autocomplete data?

      Submitter wanted to stop giving direct access to what he considered the worst option, Windows. But Linux, the obvious alternative, was already considered and dismissed. Leaving aside more complex solutions like virtual machines, this leaves... What, exactly? Firefox on Mac?

      Submitter's use of the word "compromised" was deliberately provocative. There are enough reasons an iPad might not be ideal for guest access, the Apple-violating-privacy boogeyman is not one of them, especially for the short time periods on someone else's device that we're considering here.

    7. Re:iPad by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      "Limits on what you can do with it" do not equal "compromised". I can't install arbitrary code on my crock pot either, but that doesn't mean it constitutes a security or privacy risk. Redefining words like this is a Fox-News trick. And why would a guest – even one as paranoid as the poster – be concerned that Apple might record what web site they looked at and attribute it to someone else?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  41. privileges by Dandano · · Score: 3, Informative

    Create an account that does not have the ability to change the operating system, a "user" account for your friends. It won't prevent all problems, but it does cut down on the ability of malware to corrupt you system outside that user's folder.

    1. Re:privileges by I-am-a-Banana · · Score: 1

      Hear-Hear. A Guest account with minimal privileges and a locked-down web browser, either firefox with adblock and other add-ons or Opera. Hide all other browsers... People say Windows is so insecure and always have troubles but my two home computers being used by non-techies never have any issues unless it is hardware failure because I am running older hardware. I just keep my router's fire wall settings good, don't turn on uPnP, and trained my family to use Opera instead of anything else.

  42. Old school by HeyBob! · · Score: 1
  43. Puppy Slacko 5.5 by b4upoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let them run Puppy and if they get confused lend them a hand. Usually most people seem to want to check email or some other trivial task. You do want to be certain that your email account does not allow auto sign in while you have company.

    1. Re:Puppy Slacko 5.5 by Tool+Man · · Score: 1

      Puppy is ideal for this purpose. It's familiar-enough to look at and start a browser, and since it runs from RAM after the initial CD boot, has no reason to touch anything on disk. Power down to clean up.

      If you're feeling extra careful, put this device on a separate network chunk that can't reach anything internal (except maybe a printer).

  44. Cheap-o by Sigma+7 · · Score: 2

    Get a cheap computer (i.e. used/refurb), and keep installation media on-hand.

    You can optionally install Linux to make it more resistant to stuff.

    And put the homepage to something that discourages them from visiting naughty sites.

    1. Re:Cheap-o by uberbrainchild · · Score: 1

      Should cost about the same as an iPad

      --
      Anveto
  45. Chromium OS by briancox2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Dual boot into it. Problem solved. Everyone loves Chrome. And it's like a rock.

    --
    We should learn what we need to know about issues, before we decide what we need to feel about them.
  46. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by SketchOfNight · · Score: 1

    Might be a MMS, they're getting fairly common as a delivery option and smartphones are all but the norm anymore.

  47. Chromebook by Rysc · · Score: 2

    I keep a chrome laptop around for this. It's enough for most people, and after logout everything's clean.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  48. media bay boot / SD card boot... by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1

    My two cents...

    Keep an extra media bay or hard drive for a notebook that lets you just remove your hard drive and stick another in.
    Take your regular hard drive and put it away when you've got guests coming over. let anyone use your notebook with this alternate media to boot and run from. Just keep a .iso or other backup from which to do a restore.
    At the end of the night, just reimage the alternate media and put it back on a shelf.
    Put your drive / boot media back in and you've got your machine back. No worries...

    You do have to tie up a drive and / or drive carrier or media bay, and may need to pay a license for the OS if you don't plan to use Linux.

    -- Sam

  49. Create a clonezilla partition on your hard drives by Marrow · · Score: 1

    Run backups before they arrive, and run restore after they leave. Plus your machine gets backed up which you probably needed to do anyway.

  50. Re:How about virtual machines? by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

    I am not sure why users give you funny looks with Linux. Is it because things like Flash/Java plug-in/etc. are not installed?

    Flash and Java are standard parts of a modern Linux install these days, such as the latest versions of Linux Mint.

    Maybe they gave him funny looks because he installed Ubuntu, or worse, Fedora, and they were sudddenly exposed to the horrors of Unity or Gnome3. Just when Linux was really looking like a viable replacement for Windows on the desktop(/laptop) for regular users, Unity and Gnome3 had to rise up and dash that hope forever with their horrible UIs.

  51. Buy a Chromebook by Jim+Hall · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised.

    If you're willing to buy a $499 iPad just for guests to use, then you'd probably be willing to buy a $249 Chromebook instead. It's a great second laptop, and perfect for guests to use. There's even a "Guest" account they can use, and it clears the data when they are done using it. And it's secure - which you want if your guests have "high risk computing habits."

  52. Re:A more specific case study by TheP4st · · Score: 2

    I understand why you post as AC.

    --
    "I have downloaded hundreds and hundreds of records, why would I care if somebody downloads ours?" Robin Pecknold
  53. probably redundant by no-body · · Score: 1

    Extra computer, different network/workgroup/domain, different room. Who would "share" one's own machine with anyone?

  54. heh heh. by RussR42 · · Score: 1

    ... many of these guests have high risk sexual behavior habits and have more than once driven one of our cars into a phone pole ...

    1. Re:heh heh. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      That's one unusual fetish if I've ever seen one. Maybe there isn't even a usenet group for it.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:heh heh. by VoidCrow · · Score: 1

      That was such a good film^^

    3. Re:heh heh. by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crash_(1996_film)

      If they make a movie about it it's not THAT unusual anymore...

      --
      -- Sig under construction...
  55. Mac OS X Guest account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If you have a Mac, just enable the Guest account and fast user switching. Log into the Guest account for them and they can do pretty much whatever they want. When they are done and the account is logged out, everything is deleted. Poof, all their bad habits are gone. The guest account on Mac OS X is created on the fly. It does not exist until you log in and ceases to exist when you log out. For this reason it has been referred to as the porn account. As long as your other accounts have passwords and they should, you will have no issues with letting someone go hog wild in a guest account session. You can even restrict the account further if you enable Parental controls and only allow certain applications to launch. So you can restrict them from Terminal, finder window and such. Pretty much only give them web browser and nothing else.

    1. Re:Mac OS X Guest account by otuz · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I second this. It's exactly the solution to the problem the OP is having and I use the same solution.

  56. Re:Locked down guest account? by sexconker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And put it in its own separate guest network, which is logically isolated from your own stuff by a firewall, maybe run a print server too (people often want to print boarding passes)...
    As for funny looks, a browser is a browser and i've never had any problems giving someone a linux livecd, it has both firefox and chrome and most people are perfectly familiar with these applications.

    Why go to the trouble of a separate network?
    The odds of even the most retarded of users inadvertently fucking anything beyond the one machine they're touching is absurdly low, unless you're running outdated shit on your network. Remote exploits are remote exploits, and you should protect each device regardless or whether or not you trust the rest of the network.

    If someone is so fuck-up prone that you think your proper boxen could be fucked by some schlub lolcatting around on the same network, you should be more worried about them tripping in your house and suing you.

  57. I have to suggest a specific non-linux product by maas15 · · Score: 1

    ... but sometimes there are commercial solutions that fit a specific problem quite well - I'd use deep-freeze, a piece of windows software. I briefly attended a school that had it on their computer lab computers - effectively the computer is reset every time you restart it. It keeps a second partition sitting around with your save point or something like that. Guests are generally non-malicious so probably won't disable the software.

  58. What does this even mean? by tkrotchko · · Score: 1

    "We've thought about buying an iPad for guests to use, but decided it wasn't right to knowingly let others use a computing platform that may have been compromised."

    So you won't get an iPad for guests because you don't like Apple's philosophy of the platform?

    Or ??????

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  59. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >> Printing boarding passes? How quaintly retro!

    I think you'll find that the same guests who want to borrow your computer are also the same ones who won't be able to get boarding passes on their phone.

  60. VM by jimmifett · · Score: 1

    Build youreself a "guest" VM with browser of choice and script protection.

  61. Eight by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just put Windows 8 on it. Nobody will be able to figure out how to launch anything besides Bing and Zune.

    1. Re:Eight by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      That would put ME at a disadvantage, some of the people I invite over have Win8, unlike me.

      One of them mentioned he actually LIKES it. I haven't spoken with him since, I don't want to be associated with lunatics.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  62. Guest account on a Mac is perfect for this by DavidinAla · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you have a Mac, there's a standard user account called Guest. This account has privileges to do normal user things, but can't install apps or make other changes to the computer. (And the account has no access to other users' data.) No matter what the guest user does in that account, it can't hurt you —and the entire Guest account is in a fresh state each time you log in to it. It's designed exactly for something such as this, and it works very, very well in real use.

    1. Re:Guest account on a Mac is perfect for this by D1G1T · · Score: 3, Interesting

      2nd this. Use it all the time to give friends and colleagues access to their email while traveling or whatever. Wipes all data when they log out. Need a mac though; doing hackintosh for just this is overkill.

    2. Re:Guest account on a Mac is perfect for this by bennomatic · · Score: 1

      This is what I was going to suggest. Doesn't Windows have the same thing? And Ubuntu? I can't imagine that it'd be patentable to build a gelded guest account...

      --
      The CB App. What's your 20?
    3. Re:Guest account on a Mac is perfect for this by Tom · · Score: 1

      This. One more info, if you have enabled fast user switching, then it's two mouse clicks to change to the guest account, but the guest can't switch back without entering your password, so enabling a friend to check his mail is basically a 5-second matter.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  63. Guest network on a separate machine by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 2

    These comments suggesting a Linux boot CD, or a Virtual Machine (VMWare , VirtualBox, etc) are all viable solutions if you trust your guest to stay within the environment you give them.

    A VM, in my opinion, is really just useless, because the guest can switch away from it too easily and get at your main machine. Then perhaps become confused which browser is which, see your firefox on the desktop, double click and continue away... This is common with guests that are not too computer savvy....

    Someone mentioned using a VM with a guest network and router firewall rules?? that's just more useless, the guest is sitting at your main machine. See the point above.

    A linux boot CD is much better than a VM, with firewall rules to prevent this booted machine from accessing the local network, but any linux environment gives local access to local drives, so before you know it your (computer savvy guest) is browsing your local hard drive from your standard everyday system you use, and reading all your fine datas. Or if they are a reboot happy user (I've seen that, if the browser gets slow they power off) then that user may reboot when you're out of the room, and they may now boot into your main system and continue along, without you even knowing it, until much much later. You won't know this unless you are watching what they are doing every minute, and I am sure that won't go over well either.

    The only way to go here is to have a separate guest network (hardwired or wifi or both) and have your guests BYOD. If you wish to be accommodating when they don't have their own device then you can give them a slow, cheap, small laptop from craigslist or something, and make them use that. Use any hard drive mirroring software to wipe and reinstall the Linux OS on it after they leave, or use a netboot to boot an image from a local server which you have a virgin copy of for the next user. As someone else already said, make sure it can access the printer, guests always want to print something.

    I do the above. An old DELL Latitude D600 is the device for my guests. It has a 14" screen, 1 GB RAM, Pentium M 1.6Ghz, a 30GB hard drive, and dual boots Linux Mint or Windows XP so they have a choice if they care. The entire HDD is overwritten from a server image when they are done.

    I say all this because I am the type of person that doesn't want anyone sitting at my local machine. I wish to give them full access, freedom to take their time and do what they want, without me watching guard over them to be sure they aren't reading anything of mine. I don't want them to start my Yahoo, or MSN , or read my email, my PC has years of financial data on it, local documents to my Condominium Corporation, letters to family, and the other 50% is ... well... we all know what the Internet is really for ;)

    1. Re:Guest network on a separate machine by msobkow · · Score: 1

      Or if they are a reboot happy user (I've seen that, if the browser gets slow they power off) then that user may reboot when you're out of the room, and they may now boot into your main system and continue along, without you even knowing it, until much much later.

      So you're saying you don't have passwords to keep them from logging back in if they reboot?

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    2. Re:Guest network on a separate machine by Inigo+Montoya · · Score: 1

      OK. I'll give that to you. Yes, it's possible, but requires a lot of effort, it's definitely non-trivial effort on both the host and guest side, and you still need the guest network and router firewall rules as well.

      Kiosk mode didn't even work in Vbox 3.x and I've not tried it in Vbox 4.x yet.

      plus you have to install a restricted user in whatever OS you use on the guest, and make sure they can't exit it.

      You may as well just give them a PC all to themself not worry about "did I catch everything they might do to escape the restricted environment I put there??"

  64. Re:How about virtual machines? by H0p313ss · · Score: 2

    I am not sure why users give you funny looks with Linux.

    Sort of the same reason for getting funny looks when you show up at a wedding in shorts and a Bud Lite T-shirt.

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  65. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by vargad · · Score: 1

    99% of the printes just work out of the box on linux.

  66. chromium os on usb stick by D1G1T · · Score: 1

    Or equivalent other thin linux distro. I assume they really only need web access.

  67. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by QuasiEvil · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I consider myself to usually be on the bleeding edge of technology, but phone-based boarding passes are right out. I've never had a piece of paper run out of power, but I've had my phone die halfway through the travel day for reasons unknown (turned into a little toaster and burned through its battery - presumably the radio got in a weird state) and have had it stolen while traveling. I keep two boarding passes, typically - one folded in my pocket, and one in my carry-on. If I lose one, I just grab the other one.

    And yes, most of the time when my guests want to borrow a machine, it's because they need a printer for boarding passes.

  68. Re:Locked down guest account? by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Especially if it has Bart PE instead of Linux.

  69. Just say No. by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Just because they are guest doesn't mean you have to let them use your computer. Do you let them use your toothbrush also?

    This is a really stupid question. All the answers you need are a easy search away. Why are we answering questions for complete noobs? There is a million of websites like that already.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  70. really? by Frosty-B-Bad · · Score: 2

    a Guest account on windows can't install software, throw chrome/firefox with adblock or IE with a good TPL/adblock list, dont install java and keep it up dated, you could browse the most gross sites on the internet and be fine. you could even go as far as enabling "Only allow signed apps" to run (secpol) and thats a done deal.

  71. a VM by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

    why not install a VM, making it act as a sandbox ? And there are options to not make it read-only, so it goes back to a pristine state everytime it starts up. The one issue is that the guests have to willingly stay in the VM, there's nothing preventing them from alt-tabbing out of it.

    Other than that:
    - a guest account with no admin rights;
    - a cheap tablet that you restore to factory default between guests, with a dummy account that has no credit card liked to it for activation
    - even a net/notebook or PC which you re-image between guests. there's plenty of free imaging software.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
  72. Cheap computer and format it by BeanBagKing · · Score: 1

    Buy a really cheap computer, bare bones systems are a few hundred dollars, probably cheaper than an ipad. Install windows/browsers/antivirus/etc and create a backup image. After every use, kick the format button.

  73. Some Windows software by cos(0) · · Score: 1

    One way is to just make a guest account.

    But if someone wants admin rights to install a game or something, you can use Faronics Deep Freeze or Fortres Grand Clean Slate to ensure that no changes to the Windows filesystem survive reboots or even log-offs.

  74. confine them to a virtual instance by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    ...and then delete it when they leave.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. Tell them to get laptops by neminem · · Score: 1

    I certainly wouldn't expect that if I was staying over at a friend's house, I could have ubiquitous unsupervised access to using their home computer - why would I? I might expect that they would let me log in to print something or to check my email while they were there, but hang out on it and install sketchy software while my friend wasn't around? Why would you let your friends do that? Put a password on it, don't tell them the password, let them use their own computer. (Alternatively, if you're worried that they're going to install sketchy things while you *are* watching them, then you're as much of an idiot as they are if you just sit and watch them do it.)

    1. Re:Tell them to get laptops by tepples · · Score: 1

      let them use their own computer

      How do you recommend that a child not yet old enough to work buy a laptop?

    2. Re:Tell them to get laptops by neminem · · Score: 1

      They didn't specify kids. But in that case, presumably, they would use their parents', or their parents would buy them one. (I did actually get my own personal laptop when I was in junior high. It was a total PoS, but it was a laptop, and it was mine. And I did indeed totally ruin it a couple times with malware, being a dumb kid.)

    3. Re:Tell them to get laptops by fritsd · · Score: 1

      I certainly wouldn't expect that if I was staying over at a friend's house, I could have ubiquitous unsupervised access to using their home computer - why would I? I might expect that they would let me log in to print something or to check my email while they were there, but hang out on it and install sketchy software while my friend wasn't around? Why would you let your friends do that?

      The way we live now, we're happy if any friends decide to stay over anyway.. basically the answer to your (rhetorical) question is that I'd like my guests to feel at home when they are here, including that they can quietly play with the computer for a bit and don't have to feel the need to always interact with us.

      That being said, your comment shows two separate sources of anxiety: you are afraid that your friends can (knowingly or unwittingly) damage your computer by playing with it. That can mean that (1) you are afraid that they try to subvert your computer and do dodgy things with it, or (2) you are afraid that they try to behave as good guests (print boarding pass etc.) but accidentally damage your computer.
      I believe the solutions to these two separate problems are exactly as all the other comments in this discussion:
      The answer to problem (2) is to use a secure Linux live CD (maybe a special Kiosk mode like in internet cafés) and let them play like they are at home. Help them when they feel on unfamiliar ground, explain that it may look a bit different then at home, but the red fox is also an Internet just like the blue E.
      And the answer to problem (1) is to get better friends :-) and maybe have two separate firewall configurations for how the other computers must interact with the "possibly dangerous" one: as a normal part of your house network, or as "potentially hostile" when you entertain guests or make a living as an internet café.

      I'm sorry but I feel the need to throw in an additional, personal comment (mod me troll if you like): I think it's sad that nowadays people have this attitude towards computer use that it is seen as a danger to let others use your computer. And I really believe that is is due to most people using MS Windows. No Windows = less paranoia needed. In the old days, uni mainframes and workstations had guest accounts. It is only now that insecurity has become the norm.

      --
      To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    4. Re:Tell them to get laptops by neminem · · Score: 1

      In the old days, uni mainframes were designed specifically to be multi-user, with all kinds of precautions that would get in the way if you just wanted to use it as a single-user system (except of course, nobody ever would have wanted that, because those machines were enormous and cost a jillion dollars.) I don't feel like going back to those days, personally.

      And personally, I probably *would* let guests I trusted to be competent and responsible use my computer while I wasn't watching them. But I wouldn't let guests I barely know do that, and I *certainly* wouldn't let guests that had already shown a prior history of sketchiness, which is what the thread creator was discussing.

  77. Re:Locked down guest account? by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There was a time in the distant past that I built a "very special" win9x machine for this very purpose.

    Yes, I can read your mind. "Win9x? Are you fucking serious? Turn in your geek card right now!" Yadda, yadda.

    Just hear me out.

    Win9x, because it relies on realmode dos interrupt disk handlers, can be loaded from a preboot environment ram only block device. Such as that provided by Memdisk, from the syslinux tool set.

    Essentially, you have a disk image file on a bootable EXT2 volume (nothing ever gets written on it, so it doesn't need a journal.) With the syslinux bootloader on the MBR. It is the default boot device.

    On boot, syslinux starts, loads the memdisk block device driver, and copies the win9x image into ram, it patches int15 to report a different max size of installed XMS, then executes the "mbr" of the ram block device.

    BOOM. Win9x in a ramdisk.

    You can use a drivespace compressed image to achieve maximum data density for the consumed block of memory. Drivespace3 with ultrapack on gets almost 2:1 packing on normal program and file data. You can get a *lot* of stuff inside a 512mb image file.

    Throw in a reasonably recent firefox, courtesy of KernelEx (an open source kernel resource extender for win9x, which allows a good deal of 2k and XP native applications to run, including FF10, and a modern flashplayer with ABP and noscript.) And a good software firewall, turn off all filesahring services, and essentially lock down the 9x system as far as possible, and you have exactly what your horrible family member and or aquaintence wants: a familiar user environment that they can walk all over.

    It also has what you want: pull the plug, and it is magically fresh, clean, shiny and new again as soon as you power it on.

    9x doesn't know how to deal with EXT filesystems, so the physical HDD is never exposed to your user.

    The only major problems are 9x's abhorrent 2gb RAM limit, and its abysmal network safety rating, coupled with its rather dated hardware base. (Plus the difficulty of getting a 9x install up and running smoothly with all the perks a normal user could want, without breaking it, on a teensy weensie volume.)

    On the plus side, being 100% in RAM on a reasonably modern hardware platform, it is fast as fuck. The test systems I built had Office97, firefox 10, flashplayer10, the WEP, a pirate copy of zonealarm pro, photoshop7, media player 10, KernelEx, and a few other odds and ends on it, with 50mb of "free" space left on the compressed volume to serve as browsing cache space. It was snappy as hell.

    I have only done this a few times as just a lesson in self-punishment/"let's see what kind of frankenstein's monster we can build out of retro parts!" Type exercise, but the finished product is incredibly hard to kill, and keep dead. Bluescreens of death? Caught a nasty worm in the 10 seconds it was on the net? Power it off, power it back on. Good as new.

    Gives a whole new meaning to "zombie workstation".

    I have a celeron POS I am contemplating doing this to actually. I would prefer ramdisked win2k or better though, but I don't know of a way to boot the OS out of a block device after NTLDR starts, and before control is passed to NTOSKRNL. Maybe a hacked FreeLDR from reactos would work though.

  78. simple fix by renegade600 · · Score: 1

    Some routers have guest accounts. Get one of those routers and not allow sharing under the guest account. If you do not have one of those routers, then make sure you have account passwords on all of your computers. This way you do not have to worry about them getting access to your computers. Finally make sure you have a good firewall.

    1. Re:simple fix by renegade600 · · Score: 1

      oops I mis-read the original post - sorry about that. I hate it when that happens...

  79. Don't like my OS? Bring your laptop with you. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but my house, my rules, my OS.

    Besides, please explain to me how you get "odd" looks from someone who wants to check a homepage or his webmail? Some little bits might look different, but browsers are all alike, across plattforms. That's the whole idea behind it.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Get a Mac by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Surprised no one mentioned that Macs have a guest account that can be enabled and will wipe out whatever is created by the user in the filesystem after logout.

  82. Re:Dear SlashAbbey by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Find friends who have more brain cells than fingers.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  83. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by alexhs · · Score: 1

    Text message ? What a fad.
    The last time I've flown (from France to Hong Kong and back, last year), my passport was my boarding pass!

    (I understand that you don't need a passport for domestic flight.)

    --
    I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of killer sig, which this margin is too narrow to contain.
  84. make a guest account by ssam · · Score: 2

    I made an account with username 'guest' and password 'password'. then just let them log on.

    I also had ssh installed. one day the sysadmin at work come to see me and tells me that my laptop had been blocked from the network because it was making a large number of outgoing ssh connections. important lessons were learned.

    (some distros offer a locked down password-less guest account. this is a much better idea)

  85. Some realisticlly helpful advice by racermd · · Score: 1

    If saying, "no," isn't an option, try these suggestions.

    One option might be to set up a laptop with some sort of reversion/reimaging software. If you're into Windows, try something like DeepFreeze. This is probably the least labor-intensive option. You just need to un-freeze it, in a clean state, to do software and OS updates before re-freezing it again. The user has full control over the computer (as much as you want, anyway) and is simply reset to the pre-defined state upon reboot. The DeepFreeze software, I believe, can also leave some areas unlocked so changes there can persist through a reboot, if desired.

    Another option might be to set up a laptop to PXE boot and get a read-only image to boot from. Configure all changes to be saved to local media until you decide to wipe it clean. This requires some network infrastructure to set up as well as keeping the custom boot image up-to-date.

    Yet another option would be offer up an "unlocked" laptop but drop it on a "protected" VLAN with heavy internet filtering. Again, there's some network infrastructure to set up as well as some likely subscription fees for filtering software/hardware at the gateway. The bonus here is that, if you have any (now or later), kids' computers can be placed on that VLAN without too much worry on your part. It also protects the rest of your computer equipment from being attached from the inside of your LAN by a compromised device since it'll be on a totally separate "untrusted" VLAN. This isn't exclusive to the other options presented here, either, and can be used in combination.

    You could also just bite the bullet and simply re-image the laptop every time someone uses it. Again, if you're into Windows, you could easily set up Windows Server with WDS and capture a customized WIM image so it'll have all the apps you want installed from the get-go. Other options exist for Linux and Mac.

    One last option I can think of involves an Android tablet that can be re-imaged back to stock form easily. Samsung units are good about this with the ODIN tool and a USB connection. Just connect the device to the computer, select the appropriate image in the ODIN utility, and it's back to factory-fresh form in a matter of minutes.

    --
    My sources are unreliable, but their information is fascinating. -- Ashleigh Brilliant
  86. Secure PC, secure wi-fi, coffee shop block end by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I have a secure Win 7 PC and a secure Wi-fi b/g/n - if they want to browse, they're welcome to use the coffee shops at the end of the block.

    Besides, visitors shouldn't be staying indoors.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  87. Re:/.er & .. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Sure, what do you call the boxes that connect to your server?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  88. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by isorox · · Score: 1

    Printing boarding passes? How quaintly retro! The last few times i've flown, the boarding pass has been sent to my phone as a text message.

    It possible in Tel Aviv. You'll upset them though.

    Go to India or Pakistan and you won't get into the terminal without pieces of paper.

  89. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by isorox · · Score: 1

    Text message ? What a fad.
    The last time I've flown (from France to Hong Kong and back, last year), my passport was my boarding pass!

    (I understand that you don't need a passport for domestic flight.)

    How do you know what seat you're in ? What if someone's in your seat?

    Was this Cathay or Scare France?

  90. Cheap Laptop & Norton Ghost by RileyBryan · · Score: 1

    Best Buy has laptops for about 250, which are good enough for web work. Just make the backup CDs and refresh it when they fuck it up. Or use Norton Ghost to image it

  91. Fullscreen firefox only! by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    Fullscreen firefox and change the fullscreen hotkey. That's enough for me :-)

  92. Friends? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Wait, this is Slashdot. "Guests" implies "friends". You are obviously in the wrong place.

  93. Create a non-Admin account by emzee · · Score: 1

    I create a non-Administrator account right on my main system and delete it when they leave. Been doing this since XP SP3, with zero infections.

  94. I have a laptop by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... with a bootable SD card that will wipe the hard drive and re-image it with the OS. It takes a while to write the whole hard drive, so this is a per-day thing, rather than a per-user thing. Eventually I plan to move to a virtualized system where I can "fake wipe" the hard drive more instantly, and even give each user their own VM.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  95. FTFY by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    Maybe there isn't even a usenet group for it yet .

    Rule 35.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  96. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by chipschap · · Score: 3, Interesting

    When a guest only needs a boarding pass I offer to print it for them. If they insist on doing it themselves they get to use a Linux guest account. If they can't figure out how to print with that, I again offer to do it for them. I never let guests run Windows, I don't even run it myself very often.

  97. Sorry, but my home office has become a... by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but my home office has become a portal to an alternate universe and as such is being guarded by a pair of Narns!

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  98. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by hawguy · · Score: 1

    I consider myself to usually be on the bleeding edge of technology, but phone-based boarding passes are right out. I've never had a piece of paper run out of power, but I've had my phone die halfway through the travel day for reasons unknown (turned into a little toaster and burned through its battery - presumably the radio got in a weird state) and have had it stolen while traveling. I keep two boarding passes, typically - one folded in my pocket, and one in my carry-on. If I lose one, I just grab the other one.

    I just carry a USB charger battery pack in my travel bag and if my phone battery dies, it's easy to plug it in and charge it up - they charge slowly but are effective. I used to fight over the 2 outlets in the boarding zone during long layovers so I could keep my phone charged (carrying a 1->3 outlet adapter helps!), but now I just use the battery pack - I can get around 1.5 full charges out of the 5000mA charger (and that includes powering my phone during the several hours it takes to recharge fully)

  99. You let other people use your computer? by FuzzNugget · · Score: 1

    Everyone has different "feelings" about other people using their computer. I see my computer as an extension of myself because it contains my job and so much of my life.

    Anyone who uses my computer only ever does so for a very short time and only under my constant supervision.

    Maybe it's because I don't run A/V and I disable UAC as I find them annoying as hell. My computers have never had an infection or been compromised ... because I'm not retarded with how I use my computer.

    My advice is to setup an open and isolated AP and tell people to BYOD. You can do this with a dual-channel router or by throwing dd-wrt on any compatible router you can find on eBay for $20.

    If you *must* let people onto your PC, put them in a sandboxed, non-persistent VM and set it to full screen. Make the VM "let me back into the host system" combination something that they'll never press.

    1. Re:You let other people use your computer? by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      Seriously. I don't let my wife use my computer, let alone guests.

  100. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by isorox · · Score: 1

    That'll be 50 quid, says your local Michael O'Leary.

    Well I only fly on real airlines.

  101. Had a similar problem in a roommate situation by Goat+of+Death · · Score: 1

    I setup the shared computer with Linux and problems went away. As long as they had a web browser that covered most of their computing needs. One of my roommates even commented she liked it better after I switched because of how much faster the computer became. If guests are persnickety about OS, they can bring their own device. After all, you are doing them the favor by providing them with anything.

  102. Deep Freeze by Deathcake · · Score: 1

    I would suggest installing Deep Freeze Have it unfrozen when you yourself are using it. Freeze it before your guest uses it, Then one simple reboot and every single thing is back to how it was when it was frozen. Then just unfreeze for you to continue using it as a normal computer. We use this program on our WiFi Cafe computers after getting very tired of having to 'repair' the software about once a fortnight to clear various plug-ins, add-ons, programs etc that the users were installing. With Deep Freeze we have just set all the options as we need, then freeze it. No cookies left, no temp internet files, any virus or installed programs or anything is obliterated on reboot. Works great.

    1. Re:Deep Freeze by Novogrudok · · Score: 1

      Nice. Does Deep Freeze restores all the photos that a guest accidentally deleted to make some space on disk to download malware?

    2. Re:Deep Freeze by gbobeck · · Score: 1

      Yes, provided that the computer was placed into the "frozen" state.

      to quote the wikipedia article as linked in my initial post:

      Deep Freeze is a kernel-level driver that protects hard drive integrity by redirecting information being written to the hard drive or partition, leaving the original data intact. This redirected information is no longer referenced once the computer is restarted, thus restoring the system to its original state at the disk sector level. This allows users to make 'virtual' changes to the system, giving them the appearance that they can modify core files or even delete them, and even make the system unusable to themselves, but upon reboot the originally configured 'frozen' state of the operating system is restored.

      --
      Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
    3. Re:Deep Freeze by Novogrudok · · Score: 1

      > but upon reboot the originally configured 'frozen' state of the operating system is restored

      That is great :)

  103. Smartphone a luxury or necessity? by tepples · · Score: 2

    smartphones are all but the norm anymore

    Then it appears you disagree with some other Slashdot users who have told me that smartphones are a luxury, not a necessity. The only necessity is an $80/year dumbphone in case of urgencies, and that's only because payphones are being removed. But I'm willing to consider your arguments as to why a smartphone is a necessity.

    1. Re:Smartphone a luxury or necessity? by Draeven · · Score: 1

      smartphones are all but the norm anymore

      Then it appears you disagree with some other Slashdot users who have told me that smartphones are a luxury, not a necessity. The only necessity is an $80/year dumbphone in case of urgencies, and that's only because payphones are being removed. But I'm willing to consider your arguments as to why a smartphone is a necessity.

      There was no usage of the words necessity or luxury in the post you were replying to. Something being "the norm" or not isn't related to whether or not it is deemed a necessity.

  104. Thin Client - Enhanced Write Filtering by The_Pey · · Score: 1

    Get a thin client such as an HP t610 and use Enhanced Write Filtering to protect from any changes.

    You can set a system baseline and lock it down with EWF. Once locked down, any file calls from the operating system or software are intercepted and redirected to RAM. No changes are made to non-volatile memory. Once powered down, the system expunges all changes and reverts to the baseline you set.

    --
    Hmmm...
  105. First come first served by tepples · · Score: 1

    How do you know what seat you're in ?

    First come first served, I guess. At least that's how it was when I traveled via Greyhound bus.

  106. Are games your work? by tepples · · Score: 1

    You have nothing that needs interoperability with your work that can't be handled by Linux.

    Does that mean WINE has stopped being terrible at handling games

    Icebike said "your work". Compared to the general population of people who would need to borrow a home computer for a while, very few people develop or review video games for a living. If that is your job, icebike's comment was probably not addressed to you.

  107. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by viperidaenz · · Score: 1

    If I want to use a kiosk at my local airport to print my boarding pass, I need to scan the ticket barcode.

  108. Obligatory car analogy by Livius · · Score: 1

    What can I do about friends who borrow my car but always bring it back with fresh dents and scratches and new unsettling engine noises?

  109. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by arth1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    How do you know what seat you're in ?

    I look down. If I see my legs, that's the seat I'm in.

  110. Child labor, typing, printing, SWF, UA lockout by tepples · · Score: 1

    Who doesn't have a smartphone/tablet these days to do such things?!

    There are at least five cases I can think of. Minors aren't old enough to hold a job and buy a smartphone or tablet, or they may not be allowed to carry it to school and back based on the school district's policy on storage of electronic devices in student lockers. Typing without a Bluetooth keyboard isn't so easy on a smartphone or tablet. Nor is printing. Nor are SWF sites or sites that detect the user agent and error out: "This web site is not available for mobile devices. Please visit this web site using a computer."

  111. Good luck printing from a smartphone by tepples · · Score: 1

    With the number of people with smartphones, I don't really see a legitimate need to set up guest computers.

    If someone came up with a plausible explanation of why he didn't have a smartphone, or why a smartphone wasn't suitable for a particular thing he wanted to do, how would you reply? Please see the five scenarios in my previous comment.

    1. Re:Good luck printing from a smartphone by green1 · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could reply that by virtue of his asking to use your computer that he has proven he DOES have a use for his own device, and therefore should have one...

      Of course that may be not the "friendliest" answer...

      I personally think that if you can't trust your friends as much as you would trust your wife, kids, or roommate on the network, then you need new friends.

      Personally It's never been an issue. My friends generally do bring their own devices. and while they do share the same network as I do, I figure that if my devices can't handle hostile traffic on the network, they obviously weren't set up properly to start with. The rare time that they have asked to use my computer for something, I'm sitting right beside them anyway, because it would never be something more complicated than simply grab some page and print it, or showing me something which is hard to do if I'm not present. I'd probably be able to stop them before they got as far as installing software on my system. (not that any of them are likely to figure out how to install anything on my computer as it doesn't run windows, and they all do).

      As for the boarding pass example... that's what the self serve kiosk at the airport is for. It's a whole lot faster and easier than navigating the airline website anyway.

    2. Re:Good luck printing from a smartphone by tepples · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could reply that by virtue of his asking to use your computer that he has proven he DOES have a use for his own device, and therefore should have one

      Then please explain how you recommend that someone obtain the money to buy a laptop, especially someone not yet old enough to work. Also explain how someone should carry the laptop everywhere, especially since December 2012 when companies stopped making the 10" laptops that were designed for this use case.

      or showing me something which is hard to do if I'm not present.

      I thought online social networks and their ubiquitous "share" widgets made that easy: a link to "something" would appear in your e-mail, your Facebook account, or whatever, and it would be shown to you that way.

      I'd probably be able to stop them before they got as far as installing software on my system.

      How would you react to "Would you put LibreOffice on there for me? I have a Word document to print."

      As for the boarding pass example... that's what the self serve kiosk at the airport is for.

      I haven't flown in years. Doesn't the self-serve kiosk charge a convenience fee?

    3. Re:Good luck printing from a smartphone by green1 · · Score: 1

      Then please explain how you recommend that someone obtain the money to buy a laptop, especially someone not yet old enough to work. Also explain how someone should carry the laptop everywhere, especially since December 2012 when companies stopped making the 10" laptops that were designed for this use case.

      Very few kids do not have computing devices these days. In fact the "tween" market is huge as these people tend to have more disposable income than older people.

      I thought online social networks and their ubiquitous "share" widgets made that easy: a link to "something" would appear in your e-mail, your Facebook account, or whatever, and it would be shown to you that way.

      If you want to show me something, and you are in my house, it's far easier to show it to me then to log in to a social media provider on my computer, share it with me, get off my computer, let me log in, and go see it.

      How would you react to "Would you put LibreOffice on there for me? I have a Word document to print."

      If my computer is at all useful, it already has an office suite on it. they can use the existing one.

      I haven't flown in years. Doesn't the self-serve kiosk charge a convenience fee?

      Not any of the ones I've used in Canada, Great Britain, Ireland, or France (Can't speak for other countries). You walk up, scan your passport or driver's license, and it pulls up your pre-booked flight info, you click on your name, the number of bags you want to check, and it prints your boarding pass. It is far easier than navigating the disaster that is what most corporations think their websites should look like.

    4. Re:Good luck printing from a smartphone by tepples · · Score: 1

      Very few kids do not have computing devices these days.

      Just because a child has his own PDA or smartphone doesn't mean he regularly carries a full-sized laptop with a keyboard and an OS capable of running things that don't easily run on a PDA or smartphone, namely printer drivers, Flash, and a browser that UA sniffers don't recognize as "mobile".

      If you want to show me something, and you are in my house, it's far easier to show it to me then to log in to a social media provider on my computer, share it with me, get off my computer, let me log in, and go see it.

      It depends on the "something". The use case I was thinking of is that someone would find something on his own computer, before visiting you, then share it with you through e-mail or social media.

    5. Re:Good luck printing from a smartphone by green1 · · Score: 1

      If they find something before visiting me, they don't need to use my computer to share it with me, and if they are looking it up on my computer to share with me, it's easier if I'm sitting there to watch it instead of them sharing it, them logging off, me logging on, and retrieving it. I'm sorry, there's just no way to make it easier to share something with me from my own computer, in my house, then for me to sit down beside you and look at it with you. Plus, if you're a guest in my house, why would you be using my computer unattended? what am I doing at that point? what kind of a host am I if I'm not paying attention to my guests?

      And if your phone can't have printer drivers, can't view flash, and can't run a browser with a desktop user agent string... you need a better phone. (I can do all 3 from mine)

      And you know what? those kids who carry only a smartphone, they often don't have any use for anything more. hard for us old guys to understand, but they can do everything from that phone, and don't use a "real computer" for anything.

  112. Does your live CD have the driver for your printer by tepples · · Score: 1

    If you MUST use my machine you are getting a Linux Live Cd.

    That's fine; I've used Linux before. Have you got CUPS working on your live CD? Or could you otherwise help me print a boarding pass?

  113. Do what game rooms do, ghost a clean image by t0qer · · Score: 1

    I have MY PC.. Always locked, and nobody gets to use it. Wife, kids, etc.. Doesn't matter. That being said...

    I have several core2duo's setup for the wife and kids for minecraft/office/internet. After setting them up, I resized the partition space so I could keep a clean image on the hard drive (in a separate, non-accessible partition by windows formatted ext3) Whenever their PC's get so nasty with malware that it's barely usable, I boot off a USB stick with clonezilla on it, then restore the base OS/Apps image.

    Takes less than 15 minutes to do a restore.

    On another note... Watch out for chrome's "Logged in user" I left my daughter logged in with one of my accounts on her PC. She visited the app store and installed a bunch of junk, which when I log into another PC guess what? It's on there, even the nasty stuff.

  114. just wait until you have kids... by GovCheese · · Score: 1

    ...and the problem is multiplied like by a bazillion. Linux is a perfect solution except for all those kids games like Freddy Fish and when they get older, Call of Duty etc. I learned to fear my children much more than the People's Republic of Crafty Hackers. After awhile you pretty much get resigned to it and end up teaching them how to do the internets the right way. And you'll still have to re-image every so often.

    --
    "He's using a quantum encryption scheme! That'll take hours to break!"
  115. Linux boot SSD by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

    You can have a "CD imge" (i.e. a read only boot image) stored on an SSD, and boot a live Linux distro that way. It does all the same stuff (e.g. creating a temporary read/write union filesystem based on a readonly file system), but just way faster because it would be reading from an SSD instead of a CD.

    Also if you have a lot of ram, you can load the whole OS to RAM. It takes a bit longer to load, but is ultimately faster during use. This loading process should go much faster from an SSD, but maybe you won't even need this option if you have an SSD.

    I am pretty sure you can also do this with windows also, but I've never done it, so I can't give any first hand experience.

    Another option would be network booting. I am not sure it would go much faster than a CD, (certainly slower than an HD or SSD) , but it might be cheaper because you wouldn't need to buy an SSD, HD, or CDROM.

  116. You dont fly much do you? by xenoc_1 · · Score: 1

    Yes, TSA scans your boarding pass barcode, if it is a mobile boarding pass on a smartphone.

  117. sudo lxc-start-ephemeral by Sloppy · · Score: 1

    lxc-start-ephemeral won't protect you (yet) if they decide to chmod +x and then run a local-escalation rootkit, but some day it will. And who remembers to chmod +x the rootkit anyway? I never remember. And without the local escalation I'm fucked, because I always forget to type "sudo."

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  118. iSCSI boot combined with LVM snapshots by m_vand · · Score: 1

    It might be overkill for the OP's situation, but here's an interesting solution:

    http://www.thogan.com/blog/windows-xp-vista-7-iscsi-boot

  119. Guest Account by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    What OS are we even talking about? I'd you're talking about Windows you can enable the guest account. If you're afraid of getting a virus that attacks the built in Guest account it's not a problem to create a standard user account and give it whatever name you want to. If you're running Windows 8 you could even add their Microsoft Account to the machine and then remove it when they leave. Are you letting your guests run as Admin? You shouldn't even be allowing your self to run as Admin. Every OS that I can imagine you would be running at home (besides iOS) wallows for creating accounts that don't have permissions to install anything.

    1. Re:GUEST ACCOUNT by dingen · · Score: 1

      If Mac or your favorite flavor of Linux don't have a "guest account" feature, then just make an account named "guest" that doesn't have admin access.

      Mac OS X has a guest account built-in which has no admin rights and resets itself to the default state after logging out. You don't even have to log out yourself to use the guest account, as multiple accounts can be logged in simultaneously.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
  120. Try Sandboxie by tibman · · Score: 1

    Just launch them a browser in Sandboxie and you'll be fine. The free version is all you would need. When the browser closes it will take everything with it.

    --
    http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
  121. User Accounts by denmarkw00t · · Score: 1

    1) Make a guest account, lock it the f*ck down, and you're done. Limited executables (Firefox + NoScript), good antivirus/firewall, yadda yadda. If you have a Mac this is even better as most people who are average Windows users won't get far off the trail and Linux users will generally be safer users as it is.

    2) They don't have their own laptops? Their own smartphones? How frequently are they using your computers in lue of their own devices? If you need to Ask Slashdot then you have a bigger problem than what can be solved here, or your lying about this being your house and guests (underground internet café? Is that a thing?). Seriously, your friends and family should know better and, if they don't, educate them instead of attempting to just "hope" that you can lock it down.

    How does the old adage go? The only time a computer is safe is when it's unplugged, in a safe, buried underground, with armed guards outside. And it's still probably not safe.

  122. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    some of us don't want easily hackable cellphones used to track credentials of any kind.

  123. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by epyT-R · · Score: 2

    Adding complexity always drives up the possibility of failure... Needless complexity drives down reliability for no good reason.

  124. Easy. Same as kids... by msobkow · · Score: 1

    The same as with children, watch what they're doing!

    I have one friend who is notorious for surfing "questionable" web sites while visiting friends. I simply tell him "nothing but YouTube and Facebook", and watch from the couch to make sure he complies. Sitting and watching someone Facebook isn't particularly fun, but it beats the heck out of having to reinstall a system.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  125. Re:A more specific case study by synaptik · · Score: 1

    We already deduced that, from your other (stated) behaviors.

    --
    HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
    NO CARRIER
  126. Yes Windows has Guest by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    ...but being windows, well, there's plenty of ways for Bad Things to happen. But it's been good enough for me, knock on wood, so far.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  127. Re:Linux=HD access by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

    Don't mount your other partitions in the /etc/fstab, and configure your file manager to not show unmounted partitions or automount them ; that should be enough.
    Disable sudo (in /etc/sudoers) if you wish to keep a weak user password but not having it give root privileges. If you're still concerned about your data, well you can try to really lock down the automounting feature (or don't install an environment that has it in the first place) but you're going down a weird path already.

  128. Windows 7 + guest account + UAC by stanjo74 · · Score: 1

    Enable the Guest account in Windows 7/Vista. It is disabled by default, but is very airtight - nothing can infect the machine from there. Don't forget to run with UAC on. Set Firefox browser to erase all history/cookies on exit.
    I've been running like this for years without a single hick up. It protects my machine, my files and my privacy. Also protects the guest's privacy by auto-erasing all browser history.

  129. Get A Mac by cstacy · · Score: 1

    Macs (OS X) come with a built-in Guest account that automatically wipes itself after the person logs out. Problem Solved?

  130. Problem solved by Myopic · · Score: 2

    "We have tried using a Linux boot CD but usually get funny looks or confused users."

    So, then, you already solved your problem. Why are you posting to Slashdot?

  131. Any of these things. by redback · · Score: 1

    1) Get smarter friends
    2) Linux or even MacOS box and tell them to live with it
    3) Deep Freeze
    4) VM with snapshots/non persistant storage

  132. Re:Locked down guest account? by dissy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That is quite an interesting solution!

    I just wanted to see if you've ever played with BartPE before?

    It's main function is to take a windows xp (or 2k i believe) installation cd, a folder of special packages to include, and optional custom config files (ie network settings) all as input.. and gives you a bootable ISO image as output.

    Obviously it's meant to create a boot cd/dvd, but using syslinux similar to how you do, one can boot that ISO directly off a USB flash device as well.
    Flash makes it fast, and easy to overwrite the ISO for any system upgrades. No optical media slowdown either.
    ISO makes it read only while running from a RAM disk, so is quite fast.

    For just running a web browser, it at least gives you a slightly newer kernel and base system to build upon.

    Still, I'll have to play around with your method too, as I have some old legacy 95 and 98 boxes at work I need to keep alive for the foreseeable future, where in some of those cases virtualization isn't an option.
    (I've managed to virtualize custom ISA cards, but can't say the same for custom PCI cards)

    Thank you.

  133. this is slashdot by Kvasio · · Score: 1

    this is slashdot, so the most verified response should be "develop your inner sociopath to resemble most of us, this should solve the problem of guests"

  134. Virtual Machine by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

    Just use a VM of whatever OS you choose. Keep the base snapshot patched to current levels, and after someone has used it restore said snapshot.

    Or have a separate guest SSID for wireless and tell them to bring their own damn computer :)

  135. Give them Linux with desktop icons. by crawwrm · · Score: 1

    Firefox and Chrome look the same no matter the OS. Adding a large icon for the browser and download folder is everything most web users need to work in Linux.

  136. iPad's cost money... by Gription · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you are running Windows then with any luck you are running Win 7 Pro. If you have the Home version you can upgrade with the "Anytime upgrade" bit.
    With Win 7 Pro you can install XP Mode which is an XP virtual machine. Set up a guest user and set that to autorun the XP Mode VM in full screen. Once it is setup make a copy of the VHD as a backup. They can hose it up all they want and when they are done just delete the VHD and copy in the fresh copy from the backup.

    1. Re:iPad's cost money... by iamhassi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or just install VMware on any version of windows and boot them into that. You don't need windows 7 pro and some anytime kit. Still think a five year old MacBook would be easiest, it will run flash and familiar browsers but less likely to get viruses and spyware, and if you want you can use time machine to roll back to the original install, that will wipe anything they ever did. System restore is available for windows too but mac time machine works better.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    2. Re:iPad's cost money... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      After all the hype it didn't deliver any more than Virtualbox and all the others.

    3. Re:iPad's cost money... by Gription · · Score: 3, Informative

      The OP most likely doesn't have Mac as most Mac users believe they are immune from the problems of malware. (Lower probability of blindly running blindly off a cliff is not the same thing as immunity...) The OP almost certainly doesn't use Linux seeing they way they differentiated the Linux boot CD from their normal environment.
      So if they want to install an add on VM system like VMware they can:
      - Acquire and install the virtual host software
      - Figure out how to install the virtual OS inside the host
      - Figure out how to activate and/or license the virtualized OS

      Or if the OP has Win 7 (pretty good odds)
      - They can follow the prompts on the download page for XP Mode and get a legally licensed, preloaded, and activated copy of Win XP in a virtual environment that 95% of adults will be able to navigate with no learning curve. I was mistaken earlier when I thought XP Mode required the Pro version of Windows. (Pretty uncharacteristic of them to make something like that available for free across the whole product range.)
      The download link is: Microsoft Download Center - XP Mode. Just follow the page instructions and download and install the pieces and you are golden. I would create them a separate Win 7 user and remove all the obvious icons for anything local to keep them from mucking things up.

      Once it is in it runs as if it is an RDP session to a remote computer. Very simple.


      But yeah, if you want to buy or stealware a more difficult solution, then yeah, that is possible.

    4. Re:iPad's cost money... by Gription · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After all the hype it didn't deliver any more than Virtualbox and all the others.

      Except for the part where it can be setup by non techy types by installing three "updates" from a single simple download page.
      Plus it comes with a pre-installed, licensed and activated copy of virtualized XP for 0$ that is legal for free use even in enterprise environments.

    5. Re:iPad's cost money... by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Why do think people are unaware of your points? Why do you think such points actually matter when you don't have to be much of a "techy type" to install MS Windows on ideal hardware (as provided by a VM). If a person is not at least that much of a "techy type" then the XP mode is useless to them since most MS Windows software installation is just as "techy" or more so than installing the OS in the first place.
      It's still a very clunky way to run legacy software and it's depressing that it's far easier and more "seamless" to run some old MS Windows applications on other operating systems using wine - which is a library method. The only reason the stuff doesn't run properly on win7 etc is because there is no practical MS mechanism to retain old libraries apart from the dotnet ecosystem (practicality finally trumped marketing there so v1 stuff will run at the same time as v4.5). They just did not think it was important enough to manage libraries properly so provided a half-arsed "me too" option that is entirely pointless due to there being so many other more mature and reliable VMs out there.

    6. Re:iPad's cost money... by Endo13 · · Score: 1

      I was wondering how long it would take somene to suggest a VM. That was my first thought as well.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    7. Re:iPad's cost money... by goarilla · · Score: 1

      Non techy users don't install updates.

    8. Re:iPad's cost money... by bareshiyth · · Score: 1

      Can You? Two years ago I tried to set up an "XP Virtual Box" on advice of a computer tech, on my PC, running Win 7 Home. Wouldn't work, I was advised it was because XP Virtual won't run on a 64bit machine. They wrong? Can I upgrade and successfully get my XP VM, so I can run some prescious software (older, better version) that runs on XP, but nothing later?

  137. Re:Does your live CD have the driver for your prin by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    You can print to file on a flash card and then insert the flash card into my printer that accepts such things. I suppose you could counter with 'well what if there is no USB driver for the flash reader', or 'does the Live CD support your NIC?'.

    --
    Good-bye
  138. Re:Locked down guest account? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    You have to support legacy 9x systems? Ouch.

    Here's a few other tidbits to help then. :D

    Your legacy systems are highly unlikely to have healthy IDE HDDS after this long in service, and getting replacements is not likely to be possible in another 5 years.

    If you use this "preboot ramdisk" method, you can use a poor man's SSD, like a CF->IDE adaptor. the limited speed (often painfully slow. My CF adaptor is limited to PIO4 tranfers! Gerk!) And limited writelife of this super bargain basement solution are mostly overcome by the read once, write never nature of this setup. The adaptors themselves are cheap. If you don't want to dish out the $$ for CF modules, you actually *can* chain an SDHC->CF adaptor to the IDE interface, and use dirt cheap SD cards. (These solutions are very popular with embedded systems where rugged and cheap are both required. Tradeoff is speed. Boot up time will be painful, but once up, will be a speed demon.)

    That would let your industrial install 9x systems live for a *very* long time, and would put a lot less wear on the system's PSU.

    Since you are booting them via syslinux, you can have a great many fully configured disk images stored on the media. A commodity 32gb SDCard could hold 64 fully configured image configurations, and present a list on bootup! (Even more if you use win95B, or win98 first edition, which can live in 256mb and 384mb images, respectively. Tested!)

    For ease of maintenance, I strongly suggest a uniform workstation hardware base, so that you can use one system as the testbed, build images from it, and deploy them everywhere else. Possbly use a startup script to change the network IDs to avoid collisions on the fly.

    Ideally, once all set up, this is a "set and forget" solution. However, the tradeoff is in prepping suitable images, which isn't a trivial exercise.

  139. Thin client by pbjones · · Score: 1

    Set up a thin client for guests, then they will not ask for computer access again.

    --
    There was an unknown error in the submission.
  140. Re:Locked down guest account? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Not unless they have access to fdisk, which you can remove from the image.

    Format.com will only work on msdos(fat16/fat32) partitions. Windows 95/98 will not even try to mount a non-DOS partition. HDDs are treated quite differently from unformatted or "other system" formatted floppies or removable disks. Quite literally, the only tool that can touch the ext2 volume is fdisk.

    Remove it from the image, problem solved.

  141. Nothing wrong with Windows that Linux can't fix by jmd · · Score: 1

    First dump Windows. Then install Linux. (it is just a matter of time for you too) Go from there. As you discover Linux, make notes on which apps do what. Then make a cheat sheets for guests to use. Have them use a guest account.

    I would have a hard time believing that anyone is such a good computer user that they never have issues with Windows. It is just impossible to stay 100% clean all the time.

  142. Re:Locked down guest account? by dissy · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the tips. I'm definitely very interested in ram disk-ing them, and going read-only for normal operations.

    I actually do use IDE to CF adapters already, although just as a direct HD replacement for the C: drive. Some of the DOS systems can't address disks(well, partitions) larger than 2gb anyway.

    In one case the 98 system drives a 6 foot vinyl cutter machine, and the data files are created in a client program on an XP desktop. But the cutter software and drivers work with a custom PCI card that, along with a serial port, tell the machine what to do. I can't get either the core software or drivers to work under 2k or newer.
    I currently use a CF card (plenty of backup cards in the desk next to it) for the C drive, which I can reimage to a bad or new card (bad as in windows broke itself, or someone broke windows)
    D: is a spinny disk still.
    98 USB support is pretty crappy, but I use that none the less to transfer files to it. (a different driver for each brand flash drive, really?) but have always wanted to try and get a network link up to the file server, even if read only and one way. I've been putting it off until I had a better setup for the whole thing to implement anyway, and this certainly qualifies.

    Also, three of our five surface mount assembly lines have pcb screen printer machines still on DOS.
    These guys use a couple ISA IO cards to drive the actual hardware. This I've managed to virtualize using a usb2isa adapter and virtualbox. Which also let me add networking support through the host, and all running on modern hardware with a linux kernel as the host.

    After going the CF as C: route for awhile, it was still annoying using the on-board software to create machine programs when the nice GUI app was so much easier to use.
    Now a CIFS mount puts a file server folder on the host pc, which is mounted as a drive letter under the VM, with the C: drive being a copy-on-write setup (I posted about that method earlier up in the thread)

    I even have a 95 computer driving an xray machine (for detecting defects in mosfet chips) where the software has the most stupid thing I've ever seen in my life, making it a pain to moderalize.
    The software doesn't use real timing loops, but hard coded 'for' loops of a fixed length, and uses this for bit-banging purposes on the serial control lines.
    The CPU must be an Intel Pentium (one), and must be between 75mhz and 120mhz.
    Any faster, or slower, and the timing loops are off too far for it to communicate with the machine properly.
    The thing was already an old install when I got there, with no backups of course, misplaced serial keys, and the company that made it is no longer in business.
    I'm completely at a loss what to do on this thing to avoid using the existing install, or virtualize it in any way to keep the timing proper.

    So far I've resorted to a clonezilla backup image which was converted into a restore cd.
    Drop the cd in, reboot, hit enter two or three times and wait a minute. When it's done restoring it reboots back to windows.
    Apparently they have to do this at least once a month (but at least no longer eats up my time!)

    On one hand, these things are quite the pain in the side to have to keep running.
    On the other, most of these things are so expensive it's actually pretty cost effective to spend numerous hours of my time with such bandaid solutions.

    At this point the easier and faster it is for the operators to do a restore, the better!

  143. Re:How about virtual machines? by the_fat_kid · · Score: 1

    Mom? is that you?

    --
    -- Sig under construction...
  144. Webconverger by caitriona81 · · Score: 1

    Webconverger (http://www.webconverger.com/) is a livecd and USB stick bootable linux distribution for kiosk applications, which also puts it in the same territory as ChromeOS for guest access, only it will work out of the box on a wider range of hardware.

    By design, it gives the user a tightly locked down, full screen Firefox browser, and nothing else, but it's somewhat configurable and even supports printing (http://webconverger.org/printing/). Out of the box, it supports the Flash and Google Talk Voice/Video plugins, so most if not all websites will work out of the box, and the user can even do voice calling and Google+ hangouts.

    The with the exception of the couple of proprietary browser plugins mentioned above, the software appears to be entirely open source, and they offer a free version, subscription service to customize and manage it for you, or source code if you are comfortable getting your hands dirty. Overall, this looks like one of the easiest ways to provide a safe, controlled environment for your guests, locking them into a browser window where they can do what they want, but nothing will be saved. Given the plethora of cloud apps out there to serve as as substitutes for local apps, with a little creativity, this should be all anyone who doesn't bring their own computer will need.

  145. Live CD by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

    Get a live cd and a computer without a hard drive for guests. Power cycle it when you switch guests. Problem solved. If they want to save something they can stick their own usb device in and infect it all they want. They just have to take that usb device with them when they're done.

  146. Re:Locked down guest account? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Slick!

    Here's some advice to help save time.

    These volumes are small, and you want to use drivespace to cram as much into them as you can. Consider using a dos 6.22 diskette image (or boot cd) with the old dos version of drivespace to initially partition and format the base volume you will later image. This will let you create the compressed volume file very early in the setup process, saving you a very lengthly compression operation later. Drivespace and drivespace3 volumes can ONLY be FAT16 for the host. A Dos6.22 partition, format, and drivespace compress cycle ensures a suitable foundation to install on. You DON'T need a full dos 6.22 install.

    Boot the dos 6.22 boot disk, partition and format the volume with the /s argument, then drivespace it. Copy any cdrom dos drivers and the dos 6.22 mscdex.exe to the compressed bootable volume.

    Make sure the partition type is CHS and not LBA.

    Pop in the install CD for whatever flavor of 9x you are going to use. It will happily install onto the dos6.22 drvspace packed volume, and pack as it installs seamlessly.

    When it finishes, the install process automatically upgrades the volume to drivespace3 format, and updates the drvspace.bin and dblspace.bin drivers on the root for you. Easy peasy.

    Configure the system, install drivers, etc. Set the swap file to either be OFF, or on the spinny disk.

    Run compression agent, set to "ultrapack all files", click OK, then go do something else for about an hour or two, while it crushes everything down.

    Defragment the system.

    Shut it down, then image the partition.

    Build the EXT2 boot medium, put memdisk and the image file on, set it all up, and feel good about yourself.

  147. MS Windows 8 rendered that point dead by dbIII · · Score: 1

    I've seen that a few people that had never seen linux before managed to download and run knoppix from a CD to troubleshoot and solve various hardware of MS Windows file problems without spending much time or getting very confused. The UI is far closer to what they are used to than MS Windows 8 is.

  148. Separate users by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    I run a Linux desktop with multiple logins and just create a new one for guests to use on the fly. That account is then deleted and the data scrubbed when they're done. Sometimes that's a student living with us for a few months, sometimes a one day photo viewing session.

    As for Windows, creating a restore point and creating a fresh non-privileged account for them to use then deleting the user and/or running system restore back to that save point should suffice in most cases.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  149. Re:Locked down guest account? by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    Oh yeah,

    For the Xray driving win95 machine:

    Take your existing image, and push it to a temporary physical volume. Defragment it and pair it down.

    Use something like partition magic to shrink it down to a suitable size.

    Use that image for the ramdisk. If you can't shrink it small enough, bite your knuckles, and install win95 pluspack. This will give you drivespace3. (Uninstall desktop themes afterward.) Compress the volume, (it *will* take all day.) Then defragment. Use the drivespace3 managment program to resize the CVF. Make it as small as possible. Shut down, then partition magic it to shrink it up, then use that.

    If you are so unfortunate as to have a fat32 volume and not fat16, (and as such can't use drivespace to squash it), you have to MANUALLY build a fat16 bootable volume, copy all the files into it, doctor msdos.sys to be the proper kind, and hope for the best.

  150. or a thin client that has IE on it. by clovis · · Score: 1

    Something like a Wyse V90 on ebay; 79-99$
    embedded windows with a read only file system

  151. Re:How about virtual machines? by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

    Mom? is that you?

    Yup, your mom's karma on Slashdot is high enough to get a karma-bonus when posting...

    --
    XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  152. WebConverger...or Knoppix...or Mint Live by Voyager529 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, let 'em boot off a CD, do their internetness, and let it all go away after reboot. If you have guests that are sufficiently malicious as to scrub through your hard disk from a live Linux environment, you've got plenty of other issues right behind it. If you're simply looking to fix stupid, then grab a Live CD boot off it, and let it exist that way. Unless there's a particular need, don't complicate things.

  153. WiFi + Kindle HD by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    Anyone can use a Kindle.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  154. OSX has a Guest account for this purpose by davesag · · Score: 1

    Any Mac can have a Guest account enabled that gets nuked again when the guest logs out. We do this all the time. When a guest arrives without their own machine they are welcome to use the Guest account on the MacMini that's plugged into the TV. We can use the FastUser Switching to flick it back to my, or my wife's account, as needed, without logging the guest out, but when they leave we just log them out and voila - the Guest account is wiped.

    --
    I used to have a better sig than this, but I got tired of it
  155. Deep Freeze by gbobeck · · Score: 1

    I've had pretty good luck running Deep Freeze in cases like this.

    With deep freeze, you set up your computer up into the ideal state you want it and then "freeze" it. Users can use the system to their heart's desire, and then you can restore it to the ideal state by rebooting the box.

    wikipedia article about it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Freeze_(software)

    Product website: http://www.faronics.com/products/deep-freeze/

    --
    Navicula hydraulica plena anguilarum est. Omnes castelli tuus nostri sunt. Ed elli avea del cul fatto trombetta.
  156. Got guests around? by Loki_666 · · Score: 1

    Init 3. If they can use the computer from that state, you know they are clever enough to be let loose doing whatever they want.

    When guests have gone, init 5.

  157. GUEST ACCOUNT by Agent+ME · · Score: 1

    What the hell are with all of these complicated answers? Virtual Machines? Snapshots? Linux installs just for guests? Two routers? Shit, this is not that hard. BOTH WINDOWS AND UBUNTU FOR EXAMPLE ALREADY SUPPORT A GUEST ACCOUNT OUT OF THE BOX WHICH HAS NO ADMIN ACCESS. THAT IS A PERFECT SOLUTION FOR THIS.

    If Mac or your favorite flavor of Linux don't have a "guest account" feature, then just make an account named "guest" that doesn't have admin access. If you're worried that the account alone is compromised, then delete the account and re-create it (or just delete everything under its home folder).

  158. Are your friends really that dumb? by Askmum · · Score: 1

    You get funny looks with an Linux boot CD but not when you hand them an iPad? Maybe you should look funny at your "friends".
    Go with the Linux boot CD (or better: USB stick). If your friends really can't use Firefox or Chrome in Linux than they're just too stupid to breathe.

  159. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    I too sometimes look down and see your legs. WTF is going on?

  160. DeepFreeze by gd2shoe · · Score: 1

    I've not used DeepFreeze personally, but I've read about it. From what I've heard, If you want to make changes you boot the system to get a clean state, and then "thaw" it. Then any changes you make will be permanent. You reboot to get back into a frozen state.

    It seems to me that using DeepFreeze probably requires doing manual updates every once in a while, but it's not as onerous as making a whole new disk image.

    --
    I won't join Slashcott. OTOH, If Beta goes live, I just won't be back until it's fixed. Sorry Dice.
  161. Oodles of Linux options by fritsd · · Score: 1

    Because malware doesn't exist for Linux, right? And phishing is impossible as well?

    If the live CD is set up to not mount your harddisk, and if it has a guest account without root privilege, then only malware that does privilege escalation (becoming root) after exploiting a bug can do damage.
    Now I'm not a real security expert at all, but I think if the live CD is paranoid enough to not have any harddisk kernel modules, have SELinux on in "setenforce 1" mode, and if the live CD is burned to a DVD-R instead of DVD-RW then I think you'd be quite safe.
    Seeing as Linux is used for a lot of different tasks, I believe (but I'm not certain) that there are several distros especially *for* this purpose; hardened Linux distros for computer forensics, penetration testing etc.
    A quick look at distrowatch.com shows (N.B. I haven't tested any of these, my family are not computer criminals AFAIK):

    • http://distrowatch.com/search.php select distribution category:
    • "security" -- 16 distros
    • "privacy" -- 5 distros; these sound useful esp. LPS
    • "forensics" -- 8 distros
    • "live medium" -- 210 distros, many are i18-ized

    Now if your guests are not only hardened computer criminals but also very old, consider the extreme user-friendlyness of the Italian project "ELDY":

    http://www.eldy.eu/
    I haven't tried it yet, but I respect their philosophy: "when you were a baby, they taught you how to walk and cycle. Now that you're grown up and they are getting senile and feeble in the head, you can teach them computer use. Do your best to try, anyway". (I paraphrase ..slightly.. )

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  162. You would far prefer Windows! She's Normal! by fritsd · · Score: 1

    I am not sure why users give you funny looks with Linux.
    Sort of the same reason for getting funny looks when you show up at a wedding in shorts and a Bud Lite T-shirt.

    Oh the insecurity... ;-)

    Please stay with MS Windows!

    "No, no. You would far prefer Windows. That’s like a nice normal bottle-blonde girlfriend who has a proper office job and dresses cleanly from Primark and has a sweet smile and lives in a proper bedsit and knows everyone and how to act normally and is accepted in society. She gets headaches a lot and fits of rage where she smashes everything and there’s an odd smell of decaying human flesh coming from the drains and the toilet backs up every now and then filling the entire block with sewage and bits of bodies, but this is entirely normal and nothing to worry about. "

    Link: http://newstechnica.com/2008/11/09/ask-jack/ (probably NSFW)

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
    1. Re:You would far prefer Windows! She's Normal! by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      "No, no. You would far prefer Windows. That’s like a nice normal bottle-blonde girlfriend who has a proper office job and dresses cleanly from Primark and has a sweet smile and lives in a proper bedsit and knows everyone and how to act normally and is accepted in society. She gets headaches a lot and fits of rage where she smashes everything and there’s an odd smell of decaying human flesh coming from the drains and the toilet backs up every now and then filling the entire block with sewage and bits of bodies, but this is entirely normal and nothing to worry about.
      "

      Link: http://newstechnica.com/2008/11/09/ask-jack/ (probably NSFW)

      Well that's the crazy part, Joe Sixpack and Julie Ginantonix are quite happy with their completely broken Windows. I have learned not to challenge their limited ability to acquire new skills.

      Forget Linux, my eldest brother threw a Windows hissy fit when he learned I'd migrated to a macbook. (Until he learned that in the decade he wasn't paying attention it had magically become Unix.)

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  163. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by bryan1945 · · Score: 1

    Your guests are stopping by a visit before going directly to the airport, and didn't think of printing the boarding passes before hand? Or they don't have a printer? You have some dumb friends.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  164. Virtualization by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    Install some virtualization software e.g. VirtualBox and install whatever OS your guests like. Then clone the image for each guest to use, and delete it after that.

  165. Buy used laptop for guests by Novogrudok · · Score: 1

    You can buy a used, but perfectly usable and cheap windows XP/7 laptop from your local Craigslist or ebay. Re-image it regularly.

  166. zfs snapshots by ggendel · · Score: 1

    If you're running with zfs, just take a snapshot of the file system before handing over the system. When they're done, roll back to your snapshot. Both take seconds to perform. There may be other filesystems that can do this, but this is the one I'm familiar with and it works extremely well and doesn't require any virtual machine layer.

  167. Re:Does your live CD have the driver for your prin by tepples · · Score: 1

    insert the flash card into my printer that accepts such things

    I wasn't aware that such printers existed. Is it USB or SD, so that I have something to type into Yandex or Google?

  168. Linux, VM, Windows by jandersen · · Score: 1

    This is what I would do - crude, but it should work: Install Linux on your system, then some VM - I prefer VirtualBox, personally. Then install Windows in a VM, with all the things you want there. Shut it down, and make a clone/backup or whatever; this is for when you want to clean out your guest Windows. Now, you can let your guests play with Windows, and when they muck it up, you restore it from backup to a know, clean state.

  169. Laptop as necessity vs. luxury by tepples · · Score: 1

    But in that case, presumably, they would use their parents', or their parents would buy them one.

    So are you claiming that a laptop for a child is a necessity, not a luxury? This appears to directly contradict what I was told in the last article about Alan Kay and the iPad: kids deserve to have a limited-function tablet, not even a beater laptop. And how do you expect the child to have the laptop with him if the school forbids storing laptops in student lockers or carrying them on school buses?

    1. Re:Laptop as necessity vs. luxury by neminem · · Score: 1

      No, I'm not claiming that a laptop for a child is a necessity, that's why I also said they could use their parents'. Heck, if you're talking about a kid young enough that they shouldn't be responsible for a full function laptop, sure, they could use a "limited function tablet", too. Or nothing, does a kid that young even need the internet? Probably not. By high school, though, I would totally buy my kid a laptop if I had a kid, and a kid in high school is still too young to be working, or at least, certainly too young to be working full time at a job that would allow said kid to buy his own laptop with his own money. I'd probably do what my parents did: if my kid was the sort of person who really wanted computer access all the time (likely: he'd be my kid), I'd buy him a junk laptop off craigslist or something in 7th grade, and a proper laptop in 9th if he didn't lose or destroy the junk one. Otherwise he'd keep getting junk ones.

      And nobody was talking about school before (then again, nobody was talking about kids before, either....) Maybe I'd find a school that wasn't as dumb about computers. Or maybe, since I'd be driving the kid to this friend's house anyway, most likely, I'd just bring the kid his laptop when I dropped him off?

  170. Quit using windows? by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu has a guest account that gives limited priveleges and doesn't require a password. It never ceases to amaze me all the BS people put up with to keep using windows, perhaps you shold dual boot and leave Ubuntu as the default so if a guest boots up a PC they get a Ubuntu Guest account unless they know the magic keystroke combo to switch to windows.

    Guests shouldn't need to install software anyhow, that's something you'd do on your own machine, not someone else's.

  171. I have a sane family computer by e70838 · · Score: 1

    Use ubuntu, create a guest account, install windows in virtualbox, clean the virtual machine at each login, data can be saved using a shared folter. When you have switched to unix way of thinking, all this becomes so simple.

  172. KISS - Keep it Simple %#&* by rhaluska · · Score: 1

    For the person that wrote "Windows may be a problem here..." Windows also has a "guest" login that can be enabled very easily if needed Linux for most average folks is beyond their ability to install let alone use. Many of the newer routers have a "guest" option, enable it! Finally, common sense, keep everything up to date on your computer NO MATTER WHAT OS and have the proper software installed to protect it!

  173. Virtualization by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

    Create a VM and run it in fullscreen mode.

    Aside from pressing the key combo that cancels fullscreen mode (CTRL+ALT+Enter for VMware), there is nothing that a normal web/email user can do to tell the difference. Just create a snapshot before the guests arrive and revert to it after they leave.

    This used to be possible with the free VMware player---don't know if that's changed or not. The paid VMware Workstation product definitely can do it, or an equivalent product from their competitors.

    --

    ---
    According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
  174. Re:Locked down guest account? by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Well yes, in an ideal world every host would be able to stand on its own as if connected directly to the internet...

    However, there are all manner of terribly insecure services and devices out there that are simply unsuitable for exposure to the public internet, and such things are still being released even today so they can hardly be called dated.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  175. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by swillden · · Score: 1

    I keep two boarding passes, typically - one folded in my pocket, and one in my carry-on. If I lose one, I just grab the other one.

    You worry too much about boarding passes. If you happen to lose one it takes about 60 seconds to get a replacement at the nearest airline kiosk or at the gate.

    I always use my phone. If something happens, I have my ID and can quickly get a paper pass. That hardly ever happens.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  176. Re:Linux Boot + PRINTER by nmr_andrew · · Score: 1

    Or perhaps your friends are from out of town, are visiting at the end of their trip before going home, and were either staying with you or couldn't/didn't print the boarding pass at their hotel. IIRC, the airlines don't let you print a boarding pass more than 24 hours prior to scheduled departure.

  177. SAN by AJodock · · Score: 1

    PXE boot gPXE, to load your Linux/Windows off of iSCSI from a central NAS/SAN. Other than the NAS which anyone this technical probably already has you don't need any special hardware. Just a DHCP server that has a next-server option, and some onboard NICs that support PXE booting.

    If your iSCSI target is something like ZFS snapshots/rollbacks are easy. "you want to use the computer? Sure!" Just roll it back to an auto snapshot after they are done. Big plus if you have multiple desktops, as you can do one OS install and clone/boot on multiple hosts.

    Windows seems to be hit or miss on which hardware it can boot its root drive via gPXE on, but I have done it before. Linux is a breeze of course... If performance is a concern you can always have your OS locally on HDD and the guest OS via PXE.

  178. Re:Does your live CD have the driver for your prin by spire3661 · · Score: 1

    Has a full array of card readers on the front, Epson RX595. I also have a HP 1102W LaserJet for mobiles/AirPrint. The whole system was designed by me to NOT rely on workstations to function.

    --
    Good-bye
  179. Both the norm and luxury by tepples · · Score: 1

    If something is both "the norm" and a luxury, then it would be polite to accommodate someone who can't afford luxury, wouldn't it?

  180. Or Mac OS X by krischik · · Score: 1

    or Mac OS X which even has a guest account preconfigured. Best of it: The guest account gets completely wiped at logout.

    It is just one more example on how M$ screws us all. Because Windows could provide guest accounts as well.

  181. Flash Player no longer on Google Play Store by tepples · · Score: 1

    If they find something before visiting me, they don't need to use my computer to share it with me

    That's sort of what I meant. I was confused.

    And if your phone can't have printer drivers, can't view flash, and can't run a browser with a desktop user agent string... you need a better phone.

    Are you referring to Android? I thought Adobe was no longer making Flash Player available on Google Play Store, and I thought Chrome for Android no longer supported Flash Player. So someone would have to download Firefox, turn on "Unknown sources", and install Flash Player from an APK.

  182. Re:DeepFreeze by gregor-e · · Score: 1

    DeepFreeze is awesome. Buddy of mine once owned a cyber-cafe. He allowed administrator access on all his PCs. His customers, who were pretty much all young males between the ages of 15 and 25, (no risk from that demographic, no), were free to install whatever games or hideously infected viral crap they wished. After they were done abusing their rented PC, my buddy would simply poke the reset button, and the machine would boot back to its pristine state.