Slashdot Mirror


EA Responds To Its Appearance In the 'Worst Company In America' Poll

beerdragoon writes "Electronic Arts CEO Peter Moore has responded to the company's appearance in the finals of the Consumerist's Worst Company In America poll. Moore accepts some responsibility for some of EA's past failings: 'I’ll be the first to admit that we’ve made plenty of mistakes. These include server shut downs too early, games that didn’t meet expectations, missteps on new pricing models and most recently, severely fumbling the launch of SimCity. We owe gamers better performance than this.' However, he ignores or contests many of the common complaints about the company — issues that earned it a spot in the finals for the second year in a row. Quoting: 'Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period. ... Some people think that free-to-play games and micro-transactions are a pox on gaming. Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."

208 comments

  1. Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This isn't the first time they've received such honors and they're still complete and utter bastards.

    Don't like EA and where they're herding the gamers? Don't buy their wares.

    Simple,
    Steve (from beyond).

    1. Re:Nothing will change by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, there is some good news for EA - Zynga is poised to take the crown from 'em at the rate things are going there.

      I mean seriously - ganking existing stock options out from under from employees, working them into the dirt, and then laying off a chunk of them almost at random?

      EA must look like a frickin' workers' paradise from that kind of viewpoint.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if only steam could buy battlefield from them. They have already killed crysis (look it was pretty, but as far as open world super hunter game it was a pathetic simple maze) but as much as i hate EA and origin, battlefield 3 is an insane amount of fun.

    3. Re:Nothing will change by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2

      Didn't they win last year? It's sort of a dubious honor, but you know what they say, there's no such thing as bad publicity. ;-)

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:Nothing will change by fustakrakich · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't buy their wares.

      Download their warez...

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    5. Re:Nothing will change by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Yeah, EA is only raping their customers, it's not like they're killing them, so that makes it A-OK

    6. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, nothing's changed. Even in death, Steve remains a hypocritical douche-bag, chastising others when his own house is not clean.

    7. Re:Nothing will change by bdwebb · · Score: 5, Informative

      No mod points but completely agreed. I'm not even pissed at EA anymore because I don't buy their games and give them enough of a chance to piss me off.

      I'll admit, it is a bit depressing seeing games that I would love to play (like Sim City) released under the EA banner and it is sometimes hard to resist buying them to just give them a chance. However, while I might love to play them, I am certain that I would hate playing them as EA products and that turns my depression into simple disappointment.

      Ultimately nothing will change until their developers start to leave them due to the sweatshop style working conditions . I have no illusions that my boycott of EA's games will have any impact on their business...there are too many people who love the 'idea' of their titles and will try them repeatedly and get disappointed repeatedly. It does make me a happier person knowing that I'm not wasting my money, though. If conditions improve, Origin is destroyed, and releases improve in quality I would be willing to try again someday (after a SHIT-TON of positive reviews and a month or so break-in period) for a special title but until that day comes, fuckem.

    8. Re:Nothing will change by AvitarX · · Score: 0

      Steam like valve? Or is there a new publisher I should be following?

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    9. Re:Nothing will change by x_t0ken_407 · · Score: 2

      I was a Madden fan for over a decade. Finally in '09 I decided I'll no longer buy Madden games b/c it's the same BS every single freaking year, and I'd given them long enough to make me a believer. It's sad really. Unfortunately I'm an avid Battlefield fan -- even though they've fucked that up too since taking over DICE, but at least that's the only game of theirs I continue to buy. I may reach your level though, since BF4 is coming out this year when there is really nothing wrong with BF3 at all and I feel they should just continue adding expansions to that. Oh well :(

    10. Re:Nothing will change by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, that just gives them ammunition. They can see download counts, look for unauthorized server connections, etc. From this, they deduce that the reason their titles aren't selling well is because of piracy, not because of the way they're designing their games and treating their users. And what does that lead to? More extreme anti-piracy measures, of course!

      Don't play them at all. Just avoid them altogether. Instead play games from companies that Get It. Then they'll have nobody to blame but themselves.

    11. Re:Nothing will change by DragonTHC · · Score: 2

      Also, don't forget, Peter Moore is the man responsible for the endless spew of madden and fifa games with different rosters and no other changes every year.

      You can't fault him as a business man. His business is booming.

      This always clashes the games are art argument for me. I've never heard of a gallery telling an artist what to paint.

      Yet, the COO of EA is trying to tell it's paying customers, "You're wrong!"

      The market is shifting. Gamers, paying gamers are putting out less of their money for AAA titles and spending more on kickstarted indies.

      EA has made missteps over the past year which would have destroyed lesser businesses. The MOHW debacle should have gotten way more press than it did. A couple of months from release, EA fires the executive producer and the game never gets finished. They then have to cut the price in half and refund half for pre-orders just to avoid the blowback. And for SimCity, they decided those sort of gamers won't complain as much as FPS players. Giant set of balls.

      --
      They're using their grammar skills there.
    12. Re:Nothing will change by bdwebb · · Score: 4, Insightful
      How about direct employee perspectives: http://www.glassdoor.com/Reviews/Electronic-Arts-Reviews-E1628.htm Also, while you work for a competitor and don't really know what conditions are like in the many divisions of EA, I have two friends who do work for them in separate divisions and both say that the working environment is one of extreme stress, constant worry about your job, and requires that you work between 60 and 80 hours a week non-stop without overtime. If you complain about the hours, tough titty...you want to keep your job. While this may not necessarily be a real sweatshop as in children assembling shoes for $1/day for 12 hours (it's called a metaphor), even working for a competitor you have to pity those studios who have been bought up and absorbed into the giant shit machine that is EA. Talk about a night and day paradigm shift.

      You don't like their games? Don't buy them. You don't like the games my employer makes? Don't buy them. But sweatshops are sweatshops. I strive to be a great developer on great games for people that love games, but the sanctimoniousness tone of gamers these days with an outside perspective on how our industry really ticks makes it increasingly more difficult.

      I have a fair perspective on how the industry ticks and I'm saying, without sanctimony, that working for EA (maybe not in all divisions) sucks ass - from the mouth of the employees themselves. You may make awesome games...I'm not insulting you.

      And don't worry, you shouldn't have illusions about your boycott - there are enough folks like you who paint massive companies or countries or organizations with broad brushes that they actually do have an impact. So you can be happy your scatterbombs do impact the performances of games and get well meaning studios closed and reopened elsewhere (rebranded, because apparently, this is very confusing for people like you.) You might not take down EA, but you can be glad you'll probably be very very slightly responsible for an EA studio here and there to get shutdown for under performing just because of the monolithic brand they were operating under even though you wanted to play such and such a game.

      Wait...didn't you just say to not buy their games if i don't like them? I'm pretty sure that's exactly what I said I'm already doing. You want to blame me for getting studios shut down because they are part of a giant mismanaged corporate entity?? Who's being sanctimonious now? Ultimately it is probably better for them because they can find a job at another developer like yours where they have a good work environment, can make some money, and can take pride in what they do as you do. As I said, and you reconfirmed - I have no illusions that my impact on their sales means a damn thing. The whole reason I don't purchase their games is because each one that I've tried in the last ~6 years has been garbage or riddled with issues regardless of how excited I was to play it or how much I wanted to like it.

      I just think it's fucking retarded to claim you're into games and think that railing against EA as a whole will lead to some kind of corporate meritocracy in the industry. You think you're playing games? You're the one who's being played.

      Again, I have no illusions that some meritocracy will form out of my protest. I'm didn't claim I was pulling a Gandhi and going on a hunger strike dude...I have been disappointed with their games repeatedly and so I don't buy their games anymore. I said, in a nutshell, that it was their mismanagement of their giant corporate machine that kills their games and that it would take their developers leaving for greener pastures to force some real change at the company. Your last statements are just silly but I have this to say: If you think that the conditions at EA are just something that you have to deal with to be a developer in your industry, and if your employer treats you like EA does its employees, then you work in a soulless environment that saps all of your creative drive and you are the one being played my friend.

    13. Re:Nothing will change by rossz · · Score: 5, Informative

      I guess they haven't changed. Many years ago I worked for a small game company that had a contract with EA to create a game. Near the end of the project I was working out of one of their offices. I was frowned upon for only putting in 12 hours a day and refusing to work on Sundays. I told them flat out, my brain starts shutting down after too many hours and I need one fucking day a week for myself. I will never ever deal with EA again.

      --
      -- Will program for bandwidth
    14. Re:Nothing will change by mister_playboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      http://imgur.com/a/gW7F9

      Does EA's CEO have any response to the fact that SimCity's "simulation" is so trivial that optimal play involves have 100% residential zones, no taxes, and no services of any kind?

      A 5th grader with a pencil and a piece of paper could come up with a more realistic simulation that this.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    15. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe extreme anti-piracy measures are a good thing. Once it gets extreme enough for casual gamers to be affected, EA's bottom line will take a hit and things will change. Maybe. Not necessarily for the better, though...

    16. Re:Nothing will change by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      More extreme anti-piracy measures could play into our hands though. Only once they get so annoying that large numbers of ordinary gamers start to care, like they did with SimCity, will things change. In other words the only fix is to make them hit rock bottom first, perhaps even go bankrupt, in the hopes that they or others will learn from the mistake.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    17. Re: Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I worked as contractor for a couple of years for EA, it was great for a few months, but they are so immerse in their issues that make bad decisions too often, they would dismiss a great contractor team and give credit to FTE, they would hire unexperienced people, the PMs were terribly bad, a lot of little things that would make anybody not as happy as he should be when working for such an important company.

      I ended up quiting when I was not learning anything nor enjoying the job, one year ago.

    18. Re:Nothing will change by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      I like his argument about the SimCity DRM.

      "I know this appears to be my dick screwing you in the ass. It looks like a dick, feels like a dick, is attached to me at the crotch and is thrusting into your ass, but I can't be any clearer, it's not. Period."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    19. Re:Nothing will change by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's supposed to simulate a post-scarcity techno-utopian communist society and everyone just assumed it was a simulation of contemporary capitalism? All the little sims were wondering why the hell their leaders are taxing them and trying to set up businesses like some kind of caveman.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    20. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's so bad, why don't they quit and work someplace else? I bet you it's the money. They can't make as much money somewhere else. Would that be some form of greed?

    21. Re:Nothing will change by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      I'm still playing quake, no good fps has been released since quake 3 and unreal 2

      All other genres have been the same since, BG, and fallout.

      Dues Ex was novel and good, but its successors have all been shadows to the originals charm and character.

      EA hasn't been on my radar for ever.

      Until someone comes up with a spiritual successor to BG, quake, or dues ex thats not a total rip off and watering down of the depth of game play to "easily balanced" or "mass marketable" levels. I will not be buying any more "tactical simulations".

      Their loss in sales is not 100% because of piracy. I won't even pirate the crappy EA titles that are out now.

    22. Re:Nothing will change by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected, Joint Operations was a good series when it first came out and was after the quakes and unreals. But that was still not published by EA.

    23. Re: Nothing will change by Tamerlin · · Score: 2

      First off, I despise sweatshops and have left companies because of that mentality. That said, I findit increasingly difficult to sympathize with people who tolerate those conditions, especially when they're for specialized skills like game programming. The company can't replace an entire team, so if the entire team says no to unpaid overtime, the company is stuck doing what they want. Ergo, EA gets away with treating its employees like shit because their employees let the company do so.

    24. Re:Nothing will change by SuperTechnoNerd · · Score: 1

      don't want their crap even if it's free.... A waist of bandwidth.

    25. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep a botched drm activation and long hours do not suddenly make EA as bad as silver lake et al let alone the much much worse behavior that went on in the past at US companies. There's some very shady stuff that went on at one tech company radiatively recently with people "allegedly" committing suicide by shooting themselves in the heart before blowing the whistle to the NRLB.

    26. Re:Nothing will change by xepel · · Score: 1

      I went to the GDC talk by SimCity's lead designer. He said that city type is equivalent to a retirement community, and is a legitimate city design. I of course think it's just a rationalization, but...

    27. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EA must look like a frickin' workers' paradise from that kind of viewpoint.

      Where do you think Zynga got those ideas from in the first place?

    28. Re:Nothing will change by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does EA's CEO have any response to the fact that SimCity's "simulation" is so trivial that optimal play involves have 100% residential zones, no taxes, and no services of any kind?

      Sounds like EA's simulation has a conservitive political adjenda.

      No taxes and no services? Isn't that a Republican utopia?

    29. Re:Nothing will change by stepdown · · Score: 4, Informative

      I've never heard of a gallery telling an artist what to paint.

      Commissions are very common in the art world.

  2. Gaming company executive doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    News at 11.

    1. Re:Gaming company executive doesn't get it by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It sounds like a psychopath saying "Sure, I'll admit there's some scuffs on my shoes, but the blood on my hands, I swear to God those people wanted to die!"

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Gaming company executive doesn't get it by meta-monkey · · Score: 2

      Yeah that's pretty much it. "We can do better! But we're not going to change any of the things we're doing poorly."

      That said, really, the reason SimCity is a bomb is not the DRM or the server issues, but the fact the game itself is a phenomenally broken, unfinished piece of garbage. See my comment history for lengthy rants from the 2nd week of March.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    3. Re:Gaming company executive doesn't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      birging and corfing the assertiveness

    4. Re:Gaming company executive doesn't get it by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      It's that point where "Please don't! Stop!" becomes "Please, don't stop!"

  3. Strictly DRM by David89 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There was plenty of proof that the Always Online was purely a form of DRM not necessary for the gaming aspect of the product.

    --
    Track IP - Remotely track the IP address of a machine via email or MySQL.
    1. Re:Strictly DRM by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I don't discount the possibility that it wasn't really about DRM, but that it was less work for them to do it this way rather than maintaining the separate offline behaviour for the information that is reliant on the network connection, and they just don't care about the criticism. That is to say that it wouldn't have been that much effort to maintain an offline mode, but they don't care enough to even bother.

    2. Re:Strictly DRM by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 2

      Well, supposedly the server does game saving (which probably would have required a small amount of effort to make cloud based in the first place), and syncing a small amount of information about city stats between players (this last one was trivially spoofed and apparently is the thin justification for making it always-on multiplayer online).

      I'd say they went out of their way to break offline play.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    3. Re:Strictly DRM by Guspaz · · Score: 1

      I don't know, I can easily envision some pretentious designer getting his way saying "This way is better, so it HAS to be this way" if you know what I mean.

      I don't think DRM is necessarily their goal, but that doesn't mean their goal is much less deplorable than DRM, and ultimately it doesn't really matter why they made the decision. The why doesn't change the fact that at the end of the day it's an always-on game that doesn't need to be always-on.

    4. Re:Strictly DRM by k8to · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's DRM.

      It's DRM that they can plausibly convince dupes that it's not because it theoretically has some utility value.

      Don't bee fooled, or be a fool.

      --
      -josh
    5. Re:Strictly DRM by k8to · · Score: 1

      If you can't see that this is DRM, ask yourself:

      Is this game fundamentally multiplayer? (If you don't realize it isn't, you certainly haven't played it.)

      Once you realize there's actually almost nothing multiplayer about it, ask yourself why you can't just play offline.

      At this point, you realize it's DRM.

      --
      -josh
    6. Re:Strictly DRM by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

      Yep, it's DRM.

      It's DRM that they can plausibly convince dupes that it's not because it theoretically has some utility value.

      Don't bee fooled, or be a fool.

      It might not be DRM, maybe the new SimCity is simply collecting information about every user, every user's computer, it's use, and the users computer habits.

      Spying on you does not have to be a function of DRM. It just makes enforcing DRM easier.

      And if the spying is labled 'market research', then any boon to their efforts at enforcing DRM can be called an unintentional "side effect" of their "market research".

      --

      THINK! It's patriotic

    7. Re:Strictly DRM by DirtyLiar · · Score: 1

      You should remove ANY program that needlessly access's ANY network, whether you suspect DRM enforcement or not.

      Why? It's spying on you, installing malware, rootkits, pop-ups, or advertising on your computer. I lock my doors and draw my drapes to keep people from easily spying on, stealing from, or setting up, me. Not that I'm paranoid (not that I'm not, either), but why should I assist anyone who wants to spy, etc, on me?

      I'm old enough to have a sence of privacy, and to believe that nobody has any business checking up on anybody else without GOOD reason.

      That you are paranoid, curious, or want to make money ARE NOT good reasons to violate my privacy. And certianlly not as part of some kind of systematic, wide-field snooping.

      And if being a user of your products is sufficiant grounds to tag me as a theif, then what does that say about YOU?

      --

      THINK! It's patriotic

    8. Re:Strictly DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not *just* DRM... it's also a great way to build in planned obsolescence! New Sim City comes out, EA announces they are shutting down the old servers. Old customers then are forced to buy the new game. At some point they'll want to move the Sim City franchise to a yearly installment system much like their sports games. (A Free-to-Play Sim City might actually be better than the released product.)

  4. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme ... We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. We did it because we're a**holes.

    Fixed that quote for you.

    1. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      People still want to argue that EA is a good company. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period

    2. Re:FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I learned they were a**holes during the day of the Commodore64, where they would write code that would relentlessly cause my 1541 disk drive to bang its head against the stop. I knew that wasn't any good for something I had just spent damn near a month's savings for. It was also very clear to me the a**holes at EA did not care, and deliberately coded in something very destructive to my machine.

      It was businesses that did this that aroused a strong interest in me on how to clean up the code so it would run non-destructively. I saw nothing wrong with removal of this, just as if I am served a salad and peanuts give me the hives, am I wrong for flicking the peanuts aside and not eating them? Or is the salad chef gonna call his congressional cronies and claim I violated his chef's right to have me eat whatever he serves and in the form he serves it?

      EA strikes me like a restaurant who requires valet parking, but the valet attendant abuses my car, revving the engine way up and doing circles in the parking lot.

      Since the C64 purchase, I never again bought a thing from EA, although I would play some of their products after others had cleaned the malicious code out of them. If given a brand new EA product, I would throw it away. It just wasn't worth a disk alignment job to try to load their wares. I would just as soon give someone a burger dressed with dog excrement than give them such a thing.

      I wonder who would hire such a programmer that does such a thing, and why in blue blazes would anyone retain anyone in the executive ranks who hires this kind of stuff. Nepotism is the only answer I can come up with, because simple common sense says the last thing you want to do as a business is to have your customer base downright angry at you. Just remembering my poor old 1541 drive banging its head against the stop on the whim of a EA programmer is making me quite angry.

    3. Re:FTFY by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It's not. People still want to argue about it. We canâ(TM)t be any clearer - it's not. Period.

      Fuck you.
      I can't be any clearer - you're not getting my money. Period.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  5. Oh good by Experiment+626 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not."

    If the always-on thing isn't there as a copyright enforcement thing, a crack to remove it won't run afoul of the DMCA. Thanks for giving your blessing on that, EA.

    1. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. Always-on isn't about DRM? So let me turn it off, please.

    2. Re:Oh good by sehlat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, the true test of that attitude will be when somebody actually publishes a crack that lets players save their games locally and never talk to EA.

      If they go after that person, they'll either be forced to use the DMCA, which will amount to an admission that always-on IS a DRM scheme, or the lawyers will have to find some very creative grounds for suit.

      I'm betting on the lawyers' creativity, to be honest.

    3. Re:Oh good by wisnoskij · · Score: 2

      I really do not think that Sim City is a big enough game to get people to rewrite large sections of its code to get it to work offline. When servers are used to do more then verify a copy of the game it becomes very work intensive to create a crack. And from what I understand some of the game logic is even done in these servers.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    4. Re:Oh good by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That was EA's claim, at least initially. They appear to have been lying, or at least overstating the case substantially. The only things that seem to absolutely require an active connection are resource trading (which a lot of players never do, anyway) and the cloud-based save system.

      As I understand it, the game has already been cracked to work offline. The only reason it hasn't gotten more attention is because the inability to save makes it less than perfect for regular play.

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
    5. Re:Oh good by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      Ah, well implementing a saving system seems like something that would be doable, but it would put a large delay on any cracks obviously.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    6. Re:Oh good by Blue+Stone · · Score: 1

      Beautiful.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    7. Re:Oh good by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Even if they're being honest it still leaves them as naive since they honestly think all players want multi-player experience and leaves them stupid for failing to include a single player only mode in a game that has always been single player, and just terrible at implementation for utterly failing to work when the network is down.

    8. Re:Oh good by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I should also add the idiocy of the VP(?) who claimed to be "proud" that he's never approved a single player only game since he's been there. It's a strange sort of thing to be proud of.

    9. Re:Oh good by BitZtream · · Score: 2

      It was made playable offline about 3 hours after the asshole claimed it was not possible to play it offline.

      Pretty much every single statement about the always-on bit has been proven to be a all out lie.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    10. Re:Oh good by flimflammer · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't take large sections of code. The interaction between the client and the server is minimal at best. The game doesn't actually offload any real computations, and cooperation between cities in regions is handled on the most basic level (JSON responses just saying simple things like how much power is available to buy, etc)

      I think about the only somewhat complex interaction with the server is the global economy system.

      The game already basically saves a local cache of its state offline when the net goes offline, and if you leave the region and come back, it will load it right back up. Dumping and reloading that cache to disk may be the most difficult task. I don't pretend to know all the details of the implementation but crackers are clever.

      I'm sure at some point we will see an offline crack of some description. Whether or not it will allow more than working in single cities is up for debate, but I am sure it will eventually happen.

    11. Re:Oh good by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      The problem is understanding the saving system based on the assembly that you get and creating a scoring and retrieval system.
      Which is orders of magnitude more work than turning a `if(connected){play;}` into `if(true){play;}`. But even this first one is challenging in assembly.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    12. Re:Oh good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It might be possible to make your own server program and direct those requests to localhost. That would limit the number of changes to the binary/code.

  6. Not...a DRM scheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck, I call that bird a duck" -James Whitcomb Riley
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duck_typing

  7. Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by jaskelling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In the end, it doesn't really matter what you say or how often you deny that it's a DRM scheme. It's how your customers see it now, it's how they react and interact with it, and that's what it will be. Your ineptitude & outright idiocy brought this on yourselves, so you can stop calling your customers liars & ignoramuses - and just fix your crap. You know, try to do something competent and classy to improve your image. Or you can just keep doing what your doing and see yourself on this same list next year and every year, EA.

    1. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Hsien-Ko · · Score: 4, Informative

      One word: Origin. I'll never forgive them for Origin.


      ....and by that, I mean the events that happened in 1991.

    2. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's not a DRM scheme then there' absolutely no reason for the game to not degrade gracefully when the connection to the mothership is severed other than pure incompetence, with EA it could go either way.

    3. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Pausanias · · Score: 1

      In 10 years when every single interactive product runs server-side only, your comment will seem charming and quaint. We will remember with melancholy the simpler, freer days the days when software ran on machines that we owned.

    4. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This, 1000 times, this. There is one way i would forgive them though, kill origin and put all their games on steam.

    5. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies shouldn't use their own draconian DRM, they should use Steam's draconian DRM and pay Valve 30% for the privlege!

    6. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FUCK THAT, steam is the same pile of shit DRM by another name

    7. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by cbhacking · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Down with DRM! We hate your DRM! We demand you use our preferred DRM!

      s/Steam/Good Old Games/

      (or any other non-DRM vendor).

      Steam is just another form of DRM. Can't play on two machines at once, even on different games, if they share Steam accounts. Can't resell or loan games. Can't play games without an internet connection to Steam (either current, or recent within the time limit on Steam's offline mode). Can't play games if Steam's service goes away. Can't play games if Valve decides they don't like you and kills your Steam account. Can't play games if somebody jacks your Steam account and you can't sign on anymore.

      Since the point at which I wanted to re-sell a game that I felt Valve had damaged the gameplay experience of beyond repair, and was unable to do so due to the DRM, I have refused to purchase any more Valve products and try to avoid even buying anything through Steam, because they get a cut of that and it shows support for a DRM scheme. Don't "buy" DRMed products! This isn't a new problem, yet for some reason people keep buying Steam stuff anyhow...

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
    8. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If people would quit buying their shit....

    9. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The reason they're saying "it's not" at this point is because they know the next-gen consoles from Sony and Microsoft are both going to be "always-on" devices -- if you don't have an internet connection, you can't play any games. Period. The only place you'll be able to play games offline any more is on a PC, and EA is doing everything they can to make offline gaming extremely difficult (not impossible as someone dedicated will always find away around that crap), at least in the case of their titles. SimCity was chosen as a testbed because it wasn't a particularly important title for them -- look at the game, how much actually went into it. It's terrible. The map size doesn't even match up to its prequels and that's only one among MANY complaints, including the DRM. If it tanked, they could really care less. They just want to know the following:

      1) Will people still buy the game even knowing it's always online? (Yes)
      2) How much of a fuss will people kick up over this? (Quite a bit)
      3) Is the technology actually there yet for always-online to work well? (FUCK no)
      4) Is this going to work for their future PC titles? (Almost certainly not, but #1 tends to negate #2-4)

      The only way EA is going to back down at this point is a boycott. A plain, simple boycott of all their products across all platforms. Sadly they have nothing to worry about, because no one on Slashdot or anywhere else are serious enough about the issue to organize it. A shame really, sites like reddit are organizing all kinds of grassroots campaigns that actually achieve some small changes -- why can't this site and community do the same?

      Put your money where your mouth is, or preferably back in your pocket, never to be spent on another EA title that's "always-on." Otherwise you can expect plenty more of this down the road. Valve is the only hope there really, but I suspect that the Steam titles on their console will be always-on as well. Hey, if it works for everyone else (except the customer)...

    10. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, it works fairly well. The registration procedure is modest, you can recover your logins, you can play offline, and you don't need to keep original media lying around. You can download when you want, on as many computers as you want. You just can only play on as many as you bought licenses for the game. There's no rootkit, the application is lightweight and unobtrusive and robust, and there's an enormous and growiing variety of older and low cost games still available.

      This is what DRM should be. It limits your use, but it gets you good support and free installations as needed.

    11. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Arker · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. I had a very similar experience and I certainly wont send these thieves my money again. The fact that their DRM scheme is marginally less painful than that of the competition may be true but it's damning with faint praise. Steam fanboys are so thick on slashdot these days I bet they swamp us with down mods pretty quickly though.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    12. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      Now where did I leave my mod points!

    13. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh. Steam has become the bargin bin of yore, and I no longer lose or scratch my disks. Concidering those two points, I was always unable to resell my games. I'm a-ok with giving them money when things are cheap and it is a game i want. if the game is gone in 5 years, who gives a shit, i don't have enough time in my left to replay every game i own, or really, almost any game i own.

      additionally, cbhacking is not correct. my wife and i routinely play the same game, on two machines, at the same time. they just have to be single player games. one of us plays in offline mode, the other, in online mode, it has worked just fine since the beginning of steam and continues to be another major reason i don't mind giving them money for discounted games.

      anon since my /. and steam handle are the same.... :)

    14. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steam fanboys are so thick on slashdot these days I bet they swamp us with down mods pretty quickly though.

      It's not a problem exclusive to Slashdot. It happens pretty much everywhere, and the problem is simply partisanship. Most people seem unable to analyze something like Steam and criticize its DRM + restrictions while applauding its support for Linux. They don't behave like engineers and assess issues separately, but act like fanbois who are either 100% for or 100% against a company or product.

      It can't really be helped. Even on an ostensibly technical site like Slashdot, the real engineers are as rare as hens teeth.

    15. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Blaskowicz · · Score: 1

      They already killed Origin, the game developer. Guess who is to blame for Ultima IX, and even for Ultima VIII!
      Well, I never got to play earlier Ultimas (bought the VII in the early 00s, my PCI sound card needed EMM386 while the game needed it not there) so I never knew what I missed, actually.

    16. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Steams offline mode has been working flawlessly for a long time now. You're doing something wrong.

    17. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Down with DRM! We hate your DRM! We demand you use our preferred DRM!

      s/Steam/Good Old Games/

      (or any other non-DRM vendor).

      Steam is just another form of DRM. Can't play on two machines at once, even on different games, if they share Steam accounts. Can't resell or loan games. Can't play games without an internet connection to Steam (either current, or recent within the time limit on Steam's offline mode). Can't play games if Steam's service goes away. Can't play games if Valve decides they don't like you and kills your Steam account. Can't play games if somebody jacks your Steam account and you can't sign on anymore.

      Since the point at which I wanted to re-sell a game that I felt Valve had damaged the gameplay experience of beyond repair, and was unable to do so due to the DRM, I have refused to purchase any more Valve products and try to avoid even buying anything through Steam, because they get a cut of that and it shows support for a DRM scheme. Don't "buy" DRMed products! This isn't a new problem, yet for some reason people keep buying Steam stuff anyhow...

      Down with DRM! We hate your DRM! We demand you use our preferred DRM!

      s/Steam/Good Old Games/

      (or any other non-DRM vendor).

      Steam is just another form of DRM. Can't play on two machines at once, even on different games, if they share Steam accounts. Can't resell or loan games. Can't play games without an internet connection to Steam (either current, or recent within the time limit on Steam's offline mode). Can't play games if Steam's service goes away. Can't play games if Valve decides they don't like you and kills your Steam account. Can't play games if somebody jacks your Steam account and you can't sign on anymore.

      Since the point at which I wanted to re-sell a game that I felt Valve had damaged the gameplay experience of beyond repair, and was unable to do so due to the DRM, I have refused to purchase any more Valve products and try to avoid even buying anything through Steam, because they get a cut of that and it shows support for a DRM scheme. Don't "buy" DRMed products! This isn't a new problem, yet for some reason people keep buying Steam stuff anyhow...

      pirates do the job...so stop buying shitty things...(with non.exclusices) blocks...download the woOld...is ours!!!

    18. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Since the point at which I wanted to re-sell a game that I felt Valve had damaged the gameplay experience of beyond repair, and was unable to do so due to the DRM, I have refused to purchase any more Valve products and try to avoid even buying anything through Steam, because they get a cut of that and it shows support for a DRM scheme. Don't "buy" DRMed products! This isn't a new problem, yet for some reason people keep buying Steam stuff anyhow...

      Guess why. Steam games are extremely cheap. The vast majority of gamers never sells a game. The vast majority of gamers don't lose their steam account. Steam automates patching. Steam has integration features (ala Xfire back in the day).

      Moral of the story: DRM might be bad, but you get a lot back for it, and obviously most people (seemingly, at least) would rather have the good and the bad, as opposed to nothing at all.

    19. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ... try to avoid even buying anything through Steam...

      Kick the habit, man.

    20. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      MOD UP. Steam is just another fucking DRM scheme, why do people talk about it like an alternative to DRM? When it first came out it was THE WORST DRM the world had ever seen up to that point, the first to require an Internet connection at all for single-player gaming.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    21. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Arker · · Score: 1

      As I understand it, offline mode only works if you are online when you set it. So, can I set it to offline mode, then move the computer to a location with no internet, and play it indefinitely? I doubt it. And when I get a chance to play a game at the location with internet - it's because the internet connection died and I cant work until it comes back. Oops! Cant set offline mode, internet is down. Right?

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    22. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GOG.com games. No DRM. Download whatever and whenever and play on whatever you want. Cheap games. Downloaded NWN and NWN2 for a total of $20. The games are boss.

    23. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to spread bad information there buddy. You can play plenty of steam games without an internet connection. Bioshock Infinite is just one example of a game that plays fine without being connected.

    24. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by melchoir55 · · Score: 1

      The reason gamers tend to forgive valve for steam is because Valve treats it's customers well. They make a product which offers a lot.
      * Steam games download very quickly.
      * The user interface is lightweight and intuitive
      * Steam games (by valve) are usually polished, artistic masterpieces.
      *Convenience of having your game library in the cloud instead of scattered around your residence.
      * A useful IM system which integrates well into most games
      *probably more I'm not thinking of

      You do have to trade something for this, but you DON'T have to trade always-on DRM. Steam isn't like that. You can play steam games offline. The only thing you are trading is that you can't resell your games. For me, this is an agreeable trade as I never resell my games anyway.

      The reason people object to the crap EA et. al. does is because they try to take without giving anything back. They provide no added value in exchange for taking away the ability to resell games. In fact, they actually cripple games in order to achieve their goal.

      If the steam value trade doesn't work for you because you want to resell games then I do sympathize. However, saying steam is the same as EA is hyperbole.

      Steam != EA

    25. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      I have a very dodgy Internet connection and when I start steam up with no connection it will ask if I want to start the client in offline mode. I definitely do not have to go online to tell it I want to play in offline mode.

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    26. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Vancorps · · Score: 2

      I agree with you completely. Steam is an example of a DRM scheme though that actually provides other benefits rather than just breaking perfectly good software. Personally I don't use it but I know a whole lot of people that do.

    27. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should play VII, it's very good. It'll work under DOSBox or use Exult which recreates the game engine to work on modern systems. There are also projects to add extra quests to the main game.

      It's one the games I want to play again and will along with Ultima Underworld I & II. (I only started playing the Ultima games a few years ago and liked the ones made around VII's timeframe. VIII started to drag due to it's buggy, incomplete nature.)

    28. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Irick · · Score: 1

      Steam does distribute DRM free games. And when games use Steam DRM is at least sane. I have very few qualms with buying from Steam, even with the knowledge that in the post-apocalyptic future when Valve's servers go down i will have to add the worry of them not releasing a no DRM patch to my list right next to headcrab zombies.

    29. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's not rocket science - log in with one computer, set offline mode, disconnect it from the internet. Start playing. Then log in with the other computer. Start playing. Simples.

    30. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

      Ultima 7, 6, and 4 are probably the best in the series.

    31. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by progician · · Score: 1

      When I bought a game, I always made an ISO image of it in the first day. That way, you don't worry about scratches, and you won't loose it.

    32. Re:Stomp your feet & say it isn't DRM. by progician · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but you know, this like cheering for a soft dictatorship in a harsh, murderous dictatorship. Sure, less people are murdered for their beliefs, yet the result is the same: people are oppressed. So, cheering for an other DRM scheme, which perhaps technically less obtrusive is still nothing, but cheering for a DRM scheme adds up to the consumer price in exchange to take your control away over the products you bought.

      It's the same thing, that paying for a club, where you are constantly harassed by the security guys. Just because they are more polite in an other club, it is still harassment.

  8. DRM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So it wasn't for DRM at all? Well then they truly are out of their minds for implementing an always online requirement...

  9. He's got a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the same poll that last year judged us as worse than companies responsible for the biggest oil spill in history, the mortgage crisis, and bank bailouts that cost millions of taxpayer dollars.

    There is a lot wrong with EA, but saying they're the worst company is fundamentally bullshit.

    1. Re:He's got a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a lot wrong with EA, but saying they're the worst company is fundamentally bullshit.

      I agree...but might as well kick 'em while their down. It's fun.

    2. Re:He's got a point by dugancent · · Score: 1

      I agree. Worst game company? Probably.

      Worst company though? Haliburton? Wal-Mart? Blackwater?

      --
      SJWs are the new boogeyman. -Me
    3. Re:He's got a point by Anastomosis · · Score: 5, Interesting
      I agree, the title "Worst company in America" is definitely worded badly. It's from the Consumerist, which means it's the company with the "worst customer service" or "worst attitude toward consumers" or something along those lines, basically. The investment banks causing the mortgage crisis may have great customer service, who knows? Most Americans don't deal with them on a daily basis, so they're not ever going to win this poll. And BP is not an American company anyway, but no one was complaining how they treated customers. Regardless if most of them are conscious of it are not, EA systematically treats their customers like resources to be mined rather than partners in a mutually beneficial relationship. No one (or at least no one significant) there understands the golden goose principle.

      If you've seen The Wire, it reminds me of when Avon Barksdale is at a party at a club and two guys walk in high (his customers most likely) and he looks at them in utter disgust, then has them thrown out. That's why you have been winning this poll, EA. You're the supplier, and we're the junkies, and since there is a cohort of "addict" customers that will continue to purchase your product regardless of how you treat them, you maintain the status quo.

    4. Re:He's got a point by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      This is the same poll that last year judged us as worse than companies responsible for the biggest oil spill in history, the mortgage crisis, and bank bailouts that cost millions of taxpayer dollars.

      There is a lot wrong with EA, but saying they're the worst company is fundamentally bullshit.

      Ah, but intent is 9/10ths of the law (at least in criminal cases). Those oil companies didn't intend to spill lots of oil. Sure, they were negligent, but not malicious. The banks who bought those bad mortgages did not intend to lose billions of dollars. (Now the folks who sold the mortgages, on the other hand....)

      By contrast, most of the criticisms of EA come from what appears to be fairly deliberate actions, not mere negligence. That makes them way worse than most of the other companies alluded to above. Worst company? No. Among the worst? Quite possibly.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    5. Re:He's got a point by jbolden · · Score: 1

      The investment banks that sold off those bad loans have fantastic customer service. They would hate to have any wait on hold much less a long wait on hold, stop them from stealing tens of millions of dollars from their customers.

    6. Re:He's got a point by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      EA is malicious rather than negligent? Short-sighted and out for cash over customer service - obviously. But it's not really more intentionally "malicious" than an oil spill. There is no way EA *wanted* their servers to all shit the bed under the load of their ill-conceived "Always On" Simcity debacle. In their ideal but misguided world they would have online DRM on all of their games, continue to release uninspired mega-sequels without taking chances, and all of their customers would agree with their decisions and love it...

      Choosing between gross negligence in damaging the ecosystem of a whole region for decades (and completely botching the cleanup), vs. gross negligence forcing a bunch of video gamers to find something else to do for the weekend really isn't that hard...

      Though honestly neither example holds a candle to Monsanto - "let's genetically modify corn and soybeans, sell them to farmers, and then sue their neighbors when they accidentally have our patents in their seed crops!" Now, THAT is intentional and malicious for you. It doesn't take a biologist or genetic engineer (of which Monsanto has hundreds) to understand how crop pollination works...

    7. Re:He's got a point by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      This is the same poll that last year judged us as worse than companies responsible for the biggest oil spill in history, the mortgage crisis, and bank bailouts that cost millions of taxpayer dollars.

      There is a lot wrong with EA, but saying they're the worst company is fundamentally bullshit.

      You have to take into account the sampling bias for this poll. The people voting in the poll are making their choices from their perpsective. Most of them were not affected by BP's oil spill, nor were they directly affected by the mortgage crisis and bank bailouts - most of them are probably 20-somethings and college kids, the majority of which live in rental housing anyway.

      But they do play video games. They are a demographic that has a lot of EA customers.

      So what he did was just superficial deflection - EA has been directly shitty to these people more than most other companies have. So think of it as a poll not for the worst company in the country but for the company that thas treated the voters the worst.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:He's got a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, considering this is coming from the consumerist, I suspect that Blackwater and Haliburton don't really get invoked much in the consumer space. I'm trying to think of the last time any of my friends, family or co-workers were searching the web for a good group of mercenaries. Coming up blank.

    9. Re:He's got a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Union Carbide. They killed ~2250 immediately and probably shortened the life of over half a million in the Bhopal industrial disaster. Barely anyone was willing to do business with them after that on principle. They eventually got bought out. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhopal_disaster. I suspect if EA was capable of doing that much damage though they would manage to.

    10. Re:He's got a point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the worst company that cares and actually gets affected by the poll.

    11. Re:He's got a point by am+2k · · Score: 1

      That's why you have been winning this poll, EA. You're the supplier, and we're the junkies, and since there is a cohort of "addict" customers that will continue to purchase your product regardless of how you treat them, you maintain the status quo.

      Yes, the problem with this line of thinking is that as soon as there's a cheaper supplier or one with better material, your customers are gone (also see: Blackberry).

  10. Everybody loves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games.

    9 out of 10 people enjoy gang rape.

    1. Re:Everybody loves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get that from the new TJ Kirk book?

    2. Re:Everybody loves it! by Pentium100 · · Score: 0

      Of course they do. It sucks for the one being raped, but the 9 rapists most likely enjoy it or they would do it.

    3. Re:Everybody loves it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks EA, for that clarification.

  11. This is the mantra by spire3661 · · Score: 2

    Always-on is absolutely necessary for them. They make WAY more money by forcing everyone to trade privacy for functionality. Everything else is completely secondary.

    --
    Good-bye
    1. Re:This is the mantra by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

      Always-on is absolutely necessary for them. They make WAY more money by forcing everyone to trade privacy for functionality. Everything else is completely secondary.

      But it isn't necessary. The Sims 3 runs perfectly well - with premium content you pay extra for, that customers buy - with it only being Online if you want to get the extra content.

      Their problem is they didn't realize you catch more flies with honey - or a SimCity that has Online when you do MULTI-PLAYER or DOWNLOAD premium content - than you do with large quantities of highly acidic fluid drained from an atomic reactor, which is what DRM is.

      --
      -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
    2. Re:This is the mantra by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I think they lost a lot more money from always online. people like me that love SimCity but won't buy it because of always online, same problem for steam, I avoid all that shit wherever possible.

    3. Re:This is the mantra by MitchDev · · Score: 2

      They can't make money if we don't buy the garbage...

    4. Re:This is the mantra by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They make WAY more money by forcing everyone to trade privacy for functionality

      Forcing? They're not forcing anybody to do anything.

      If you're one of the people who buys their games in spite of this shit, well, congratulations, you're partly responsible for the current shit state of PC gaming and the move to make everything only work with "the cloud". Thanks a lot. (If you aren't, well, substitute any of tens of millions of others).

      If you don't want this form of DRM, don't goddamn buy it. If everyone stops buying it, they will damn well remove it or go out of business.

      There are many excellent DRM-free games. Buy those instead.

    5. Re:This is the mantra by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      No, they can't make money if you don't buy the garbage. Some of us are already educated consumers.

    6. Re:This is the mantra by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      Fuck you too

  12. Nothing about refunds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I bought SimCity in the preorder, and I've only been able to play twice. $71 for two hours of poor game play will piss off people enough to never buy your products again. By refusing to give refunds for what is obviously broken and unplayable, you have lost customers for life.

    1. Re:Nothing about refunds? by klashn · · Score: 1

      I thought they did offer refunds for people that were unable to connect to the servers during launch?

    2. Re:Nothing about refunds? by Kneo24 · · Score: 1

      It was a mixed bag of things. Some people got refunds, some got coupons towards other games, some got jack shit. Searching Google shows about as much in the first few links.

    3. Re:Nothing about refunds? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I must work for EA's competition because I'm the only person on /. that is saying something negative about EA. klashn caught me astroturfing. EA is actually a great company that refunded money.

    4. Re:Nothing about refunds? by progician · · Score: 1

      You actually did pay $71 for that game? I mean, I used to be a fan of Sim City in the old times, but I would never give that much money for a game that doesn't offer any short of the care that Blizzard put in to its games. Now, I have my beef with Blizzard over other behaviour, and with all software company selling EULs with binary blobs, but that's a completely different matter.

      $71 for this crap is just nuts!

  13. Classic case of hindsight being 50/50 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The vapid DRM "argument" aside, the ridiculous take on micro-transactions is actually shocking. Is it that hard to believe that people can like a game, but hate the micro-transactions in it? I guess putting his fingers in his ears is what he's paid for, but still..

  14. Free Game Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is there nothing about refusing to honor the free game offer? The only reason I didn’t return the game to Amazon was because EA originally offered a free game to make-up for the game being unplayable so far. Now I have no free game, can’t play SimCity, and no refund. I will never trust EA again.

    1. Re:Free Game Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call customer service and waste a couple of hours of their time. They'll eventually give-in. I got the free game yesterday and a friend got it this morning. It took a lot of arguing and complaining, but you'll eventually get it.

    2. Re:Free Game Scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find it annoying that if you are accused of violating copyright, that is theft, and the penalties go north of USD $100,000 per instance, yet if the business does the theft by issuing an unusable product, a "free game" gets them off the hook?

      Its high time we ask these congressmen pre-election to fix these inequalities, with inaction to do so merely reducing the penalties on both sides of the fence to the least common denominator. If the congressman fails to act, replace him via recall with someone who will. That's how a business will do it. We have to do business the way business does it if we want to get anything done.

  15. Poll is still open, EA vs Ticketmaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm voting for Ticketmaster, at least EA makes stuff.

    1. Re:Poll is still open, EA vs Ticketmaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nah, EA took a good product, shat on it and then said look there is nothing wrong with it
      EA wins

    2. Re:Poll is still open, EA vs Ticketmaster by zlives · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Poll is still open, EA vs Ticketmaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm voting for Ticketmaster, at least EA makes stuff.

      Not according to the people that bought SimCity.

    4. Re:Poll is still open, EA vs Ticketmaster by j-turkey · · Score: 2

      I'm voting for Ticketmaster, at least EA makes stuff.

      I'm with you, and am glad that someone else posted this first. I can't stand Ticketbastard, and they have exclusivity agreements with most of the venues in my country. This means that they will receive a fee for ever live performance that I want to attend, regardless of whether or not I want to use them. Fees on top of fees on top of fees that are already included in the ticket price. They haven't done much to curb the secondary market; there is no incentive for them to do so.

      They add absolutely no value, and have done little to bring ticket sales into the digital age. Thanks for nothing, Ticketmaster. You guys suck more than any other company in the country.

      --

      -Turkey

  16. I dislike how they spoof their own protestors by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 1

    I think it is pretty sinister for him to dredge up "US vs THEM" protesting in his "apology".
    Remember, one thing EA does is to hire fake protestors to get controversy for their game!
    Stay classy EA. Even in your apologies, you ooze evil.

  17. Awful...absolutely awful company by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They've had products with glaring bugs that exist for years, yet never seem to shame them into fixing. Their multiplayer games are hopelessly hacked and they only release rare patches. I was a big fan of BF2142 and while the game play was excellent, the 1st release was so bad you could only play 1 or two rounds in a row before the game crashed. The update system is so bugged, I couldn't even play it now if I wanted to.

    EA is like a guy who beats the crap out of his wife, but doesn't think it's a big deal because she hasn't left him...yet.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
  18. Two can play that game by swimboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period.

    EA continues to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is not a DRM scheme. It is. EA still wants to lie about it. We can't be any clearer - it is. Period.

    --
    Ask me how the Heisenberg Principle may or may not have saved my life.
  19. Jedi Fail, You are. by girlintraining · · Score: 1

    'Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. Itâ(TM)s not. People still want to argue about it. We canâ(TM)t be any clearer â" itâ(TM)s not. Period. ... Some people think that free-to-play games and micro-transactions are a pox on gaming. Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."

    Failure as a Jedi, you are, yes. Convince us not for DRM, you try. But to the dark side your company has gone, yes, ooh. Doomed you are to fleeing customers, endless propaganda. Always there are two, the incompetent and the enslaved. Profit-mongering leads to DRM. DRM leads to falling consumer confidence. Poor reviews... lead to suffering.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
  20. Let's not forget that this is Peter Moore. by BLToday · · Score: 1

    This is the same man that screwed up the Dreamcast by refusing to negotiate with EA for sport games. I believe his line about EA support was "we don't think it's important to have Madden on our system."

    He's not exactly gamer friendly or customer friendly.

    1. Re:Let's not forget that this is Peter Moore. by DudemanX · · Score: 1

      It wasn't important to have Madden. Sega had the far superior NFL 2K series. That's why when NFL 2K5 was released at $20 it destroyed Madden sales to the point where EA dropped the price of Madden 2005 to $30. EA then backed up a dump truck full of money to the NFL for exclusive rights so they could sell Madden 2006 (more or less just another roster update) for the full $50 again.

      Hooray capitalism?

  21. If it looks like a duck... by saveferrousoxide · · Score: 2

    We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period.

    No, not "Period." Tell us what it is then! Simply ending the discussion isn't received well by the 8 and up crowd.

    1. Re:If it looks like a duck... by Arker · · Score: 1

      We canâ(TM)t be any clearer â" itâ(TM)s not. Period.

      This is a very old trick managers learn early. It's called "pee on his shoe and claim it's raining." It's a favourite among the ones who lack the intelligence to invent believable lies.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    2. Re:If it looks like a duck... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's either a DRM scheme or a bug that needs fixing.

    3. Re:If it looks like a duck... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *WE THE POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS* can't be any clearer - it *IS* DRM. Exclamation Point !!
      (or Screamer !! or Bang !!, depending on your background/experience...)

  22. Ok, now prove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I stopped buying EA games entirely after spending over $100 on Battlefield 2 software that I never really got to play. Spent weeks getting bounced around their tech support queues: "It's their fault!" "No, it's punkbuster's fault!" "No, you need to reinstall everything!". The game would work flawlessly exactly once after a fresh install of Windows XP 32-bit (their only supported OS), after which the only way I could get the game to not hang at the load screen as a server started a new round was to completely reinstall Windows. Uninstalling only BF2 was insufficient to fix the problem.

    It's too bad--they've made a lot of games I've really wanted to play, but I no longer trust them to deliver a working product. Seeing the experiences of friends who still buy their games has only solidified my anti-EA position. They seem to have trouble making so much as a cell phone game that provides a playable experience.

    Good luck changing my mind, EA. Maybe in 5 years ago if your behavior is really good I'll think about lifting my boycott.

  23. Employee Viewpoint by ohnocitizen · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Employee Viewpoint by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Former employees got such a bad taste at EA that they have left the industry, not just the company.

  24. I'm glad I didn't buy Sim city by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looking at the videos I was really excited for it.
    But when I found out it would be always on I decided to wait for a bit before buying.
    Then the whole launch fiasco happened, and I decided I'd wait even longer.
    Then I read about the gameplay and I decided the game sucked anyway, so i won't even bother trying it.
    The last EA game I bought was generals zero hour.
    And that was only because a friend of mine insisted we play multiplayer.
    I seriously doubt I'll buy any games from them in the foreseeable future.

  25. EA or Ticketmaster by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EA or Ticketmaster for the final in worst company. Wow, that's one difficult decision.

  26. They are doing what a company should NEVER do... by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... which is to blindly state that the public is wrong.

    Because now it doesn't matter if they are wrong.... they've completely screwed the pooch with the people who expressed their negative opinion on the matter.

    Eventually, of course, they'll have to rationalize the whole thing to themselves by concluding that these people's opinions simply don't matter to them anyways.

    Way to go there, EA. Awesome PR. You will, I'm afraid, be eating those words eventually. Unfortunately, probably not before a whole lot of people lose their jobs.

  27. Worst Company in America? Really? by Whatsisname · · Score: 0

    When a "worst company in America" competition doesn't have corporations such as Monsanto, Phillip Morris, etc, as contestants, then you know it is a load of shit.

    1. Re:Worst Company in America? Really? by faedle · · Score: 1

      What's more evil, a company that has no compunction about the fact they are evil (in the case of Phillip Morris, for example, "tobacco products producer" is exactly what it says on the tin for crying out loud), or the one that swears up and down they aren't?

      That's what makes the contest worthwhile. We don't expect the cable company or a video game studio to be corrupt and evil.

    2. Re:Worst Company in America? Really? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

      Unlike EA the customers and stockholders of Monsanto and Phillp Morris are generally happy.

    3. Re:Worst Company in America? Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't expect the cable company or a video game studio to be corrupt and evil.

      ya, we do. and that's the main problem these days with large companies.

      captcha: wedged

      as in ea's the bully and we're the ones with the ass crack the underwear got wedged up into.

    4. Re:Worst Company in America? Really? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Add the oil companies to your list.

  28. The lady doth protest too much, methinks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is he also going to skweem and skweem and skweem until he's sick?

  29. Not the employees, it's the management by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Look, nobody's saying anything about the employees, who are all fine people that I've met.

    It's the management.

    Specifically the Board and the Senior Management and CEO/COO/CFO.

    There's your problem.

    They think we're cattle. Or sheep.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  30. Hey, he's a CEO ..... by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    if he says it's not DRM, that's good enough for the plebes who work for him, and it should be good enough for you too. Why do you hate capitalism?

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  31. Not the best argument by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    'Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period. ... Some people think that free-to-play games and micro-transactions are a pox on gaming. Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."

    Translation: It's not DRM, because we have a number of customers that don't hate it enough to leave!

    No, DRM is DRM. It doesn't matter if some people can put up with it or not. It is what it is, popularity contests notwithstanding.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  32. Quit complaining about a video game co. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    EA is considered the worst company???? Get real! They are a video game company. Gee, if the worst thing that ever happens to you in your life is that your video game did not work properly a few times.... Then your life is really OK. It is more than just OK. YOU DO NOT HAVE A PROBLEM SO QUIT YOUR BITCHIN Nobody died in your family. Your children are not sick, You have plenty to eat. You have a roof over your head. You have a computer, TV and internet service. And obviously plenty of money to blow on playing games. Life is OK.

  33. Dear stupid Fucker from EA: by MitchDev · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "'Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not."

    BULLSHIT.

    1. Re:Dear stupid Fucker from EA: by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      What I read: "Our DRM is not DRM, morons."
      Haha. Way to make peace with us, EA.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  34. The multiplayer is the root problem by jonwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The root problem with the new SimCity is not the always-on DRM crap (regardless of what it might actually be), its the fact that they took the game that basically created the god-simulation genre and ruined it by making it multiplayer-only with limited city sizes and other crap.

    1. Re:The multiplayer is the root problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bzzt. Wrong. SimCity didn't create the god-simulation genre, Populous did. It came out first by almost four months:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Populous
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SimCity_(1989_video_game)

    2. Re:The multiplayer is the root problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or to put it another way.. a god simulation where you are no longer god, but EA is.

  35. If only the CEO was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dudley Cook.

  36. Monsanto by Myria · · Score: 1

    There is a lot wrong with EA, but saying they're the worst company is fundamentally bullshit.

    I liked Mass Effect 3, except the ending. They have issues, but like, the worst company? Monsanto and Blackwater/Xe/Academi are far, far worse.

    Even in video games, EA isn't the worst: look how bad Sega's Colonial Marines was, or the crap Sony has pulled with the PS3.

    --
    "Screw Sun, cross-platform will never work. Let's move on and steal the Java language." - Visual J++ Product Manager
  37. Re:They are doing what a company should NEVER do.. by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    It is especially egregious because they are lying, and they know they are lying.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  38. hollow claims by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They basically claim they didn't push the dev team hard enough, even though they are pushing them way too far as it is, and most of the problems have come from horrendous decisions at the corporate level.

  39. It's just 4chan by FunPika · · Score: 1

    4chan (specifically /v/) hates EA enough that they rallied their extremely large amount of users into voting for EA in this, and knowing 4chan I wouldn't be surprised if some of them are using proxies and similar stuff to register even more votes for EA. And of course we already know that they have no problem with significantly influencing polls.

    --
    After years of not using a signature, I am going to make one to say the following: Fuck Beta
    1. Re:It's just 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everywhere I go offline or online people fucking hate EA. I live in asia, not the US so I think it's more then just some crappy american website that hates EA. The problem is bigger then you or EA themselves care to admit. Fact is everyone puts up with EAs bullshit because they're almost a monopoly in the AAA games market.

  40. [citation needed] by Jarmihi · · Score: 1

    "Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."

    [citation needed]

    --
    ~Jarmihi
  41. Yeah, right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period.

    A skunk by any other name still stinks.

  42. EA and me by Nov8tr · · Score: 0

    I have a simple philosophy I adapted after getting screwed one too many times by game companies. I vote with my wallet. I don't buy EA, I don't buy Blizzard, and so on. While it has caused me to miss the occassional good game, it has saved me far more headaches I would have had. Companies like this need to close shop and let someone who is not a thief take over the games they had. Yeah like that's gonna happen. ;)

    --
    I'm old, not dead. Well that's my 2 cents worth, your mileage may vary. I say what I think, not what you want to hear.
  43. Perception IS reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly. If the customers feel it is DRM and you can't easily explain how it's not (just saying it isn't doesn't count) than no matter what is true, you need to change the perception because that is the reality current/interested gamers are living in.

    I love playing Sim City, but I won't touch that game with a 10 foot pole if you want me to "buy" something that I'm actually just renting. Give me something that I can easily use and OWN and you can have MY money. I will shove it in your hands. A good game that will play on my devices how I want them to, when I want them to. Why is this so hard to request?

    1. Re:Perception IS reality by progician · · Score: 1

      Check out your Windows EULA then. You're in for a surprise.

  44. Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man comments like "Tens of Millions enjoy Playing like this" really tick me off. First of all. All of these tens of millions of people are they playing your games? No. You are reading this from some other company. Right now, YOUR company is in the spotlight and you seem to FAIL at delievering what the customer wants, but you know BETTER than the customer than what they want. REALLY?

  45. If it walks like DRM and it breaks games like DRM. by Tridus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then it's DRM. Period. We can't be any clearer on this.

    EA management's chronic inability to understand such basic things is truly remarkable.

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  46. The trenches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Say no more:

    http://trenchescomic.com/comic/post/granularity

  47. Peter should have been a politician by Arith · · Score: 1

    "Some claim there’s no room for Origin as a competitor to Steam. 45 million registered users are proving that wrong." 45 million carried on the back of Steam (and others). I seem to recall -requiring- an origin account in order to play Farcry3. Though I have to admit it wasn't near as annoying as windows games in playing the Batman series. Pah.

  48. Rephrasing CEO-speak by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    'I’ll be the first to admit that we’ve made plenty of mistakes. These include server shut downs too early, games that didn’t meet expectations, missteps on new pricing models and most recently, severely fumbling the launch of SimCity. We owe gamers better performance than this.' However, he ignores or contests many of the common complaints about the company — issues that earned it a spot in the finals for the second year in a row. Quoting: 'Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period. ... Some people think that free-to-play games and micro-transactions are a pox on gaming. Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."

    To rephrase EA's CEO's words into how customers see things, you get this:
    "Yeah, you all know we suck, so we have to admit it, finally. We screwed you by shutting down servers we knew you were still rightfully using, some of our games were complete crap, we gouged you on price (and we'll continue to do that, duh!), and we totally fucked up with SimCity. But too bad, suckers. You can suck it. And oh yeah, stop bitching and buy the next game, cause we wuv you, or whatever. Where else ya gonna go? So like, sorry or something?"

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  49. BIG ass hole by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2

    I always say: If you find yourself in a BIG-ass hole, stop digging, or you'll look like a big asshole. Apparently Peter Moore disagrees with me, or just likes looking like a big asshole. Way to use an apology to make yourself look like an even bigger asshole, Pete.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  50. Mismatched demographics? by Chewbacon · · Score: 1

    Perhaps their microtransaction model doesn't appeal to those who enjoy(ed) their games. Just a thought from someone who used to enjoy their games.

    --
    Chewbacon
    The Bible is like Wikipedia: written by a bunch of people and verifiable by questionable sources.
  51. EA has long been screwing their customers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember buying the original Need For Speed back in the 90's, & it did not have Network play (TCP/IP). I bought it (for approx $50) & I was under the impression from all I had read that EA was gonna release a patch that included Network play. Welll, a bit later, here comes NFS SE with all that the patch was supposed to have, costing another $50... I complained to the company & they offered me a $25 off coupon towards NFS SE.........

    It was like a slap in the face. Because I never would've bought the original if I knew a better version with networking was coming out not too long after I had bought it. Sooooo, it was in essence gonna cost me $75 to get what others were getting for $50 was the way I saw it.since I had already paid for the original.

    Hated EA ever since. And, did Not use the coupon. I'm not going to say I've never bought anymore of their games. But I did pirate Medal of Honor AA & the Spearhead expansion. Never bought 'em. And still play Spearhead online on occasion even though most of the public run servers are gone now. That was my little payback.FWIW...

    BTW, another little example. Spearhead *Still* has a bug, when you shoot someone they go to a squatting position as they run away, looks like they're scooting along on the ground & I've died & missed many a frag because of that heh. They *NEVER* fixed that bug. Too busy rushing to shove out the next MOH game...

    FU, EA. Hope you go the way of the Dino. And you will.

    c0AX

  52. Listen to your custokers. Don't dictate! by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    Some people think that free-to-play games and micro-transactions are a pox on gaming. Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."

    Funnily enough something I said yesterday rearding the MS tweet applies here as well.

    Telling your customers they're wrong isn't going to convince them.

    1. Re:Listen to your custokers. Don't dictate! by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      The guy is a sociopath. Be happy he's running EA, and not eating your liver with fava beans and a light change.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  53. And look, they do not support Linux yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And look, they do not support Linux yet! LOL EA!

  54. Always on internet is DRM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't know how to make this clearer. Always on internet is DRM. Period.

    If it won't start without internet, it's as much DRM as "CD needs to be in the drive after a full install".

  55. Worse sin: by Snufu · · Score: 1

    Being EA, or buying their products and encouraging them to continue business as usual?

  56. incorrect. And superfluous. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your assertion is incorrect. There are many games that do not like being offline and will nag you and Steam itself will do so and if it decides you need to re-assert you are not a pirate or it NEEDS an update, you CANNOT play offline until the Stam client does what it wants.

    And offline mode is superfluous. Why should you have to set it to offline mode at all, if it can go offline?

    Because they can't market your eyes if you're offline. And because you still have to, despite proving you bought the bloody thing, prove you haven't pirated what you just proved you bought.

    1. Re:incorrect. And superfluous. by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      wrong

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  57. Amazon crowd is still posting reviews... by Twinbee · · Score: 1

    Yes, the negative reviews are still coming in thick and fast for Sim City 5 at Amazon. Mostly problems with the server still. I can't imagine how broken the game/DRM must be for them not to have fixed that yet.

    --
    Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
  58. You said no but explained yes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "No, it works fairly well"

    It works as DRM "fairly well", but the OP said it was the same pile of shit DRM. YOU thought the important bit was the "shit" not the "DRM". You thought that as long as it's "OK DRM" that it's fine. It isn't. It's still DRM.

    Why should you have to set "offline" for a single player game?

    Why is "you don't need to keep original media around" a plus point? Do you lose your shit so often?

    And NO, YOU BOUGHT THE GAME. Though Steam allows Valve/Producer to ensure that you never get the benefits of your purchase. You bought it. You do not need a license to copy something copyrighted in a manner that is not covered by copyright, and the right to install and play the game you bought is not a right controlled by copyright.

    DRM should not be.

    Your "No" is bullshit: you mean "Yes", but you don't mind. That's not "No".

  59. On a different subject.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...... Most people still trust Google and think the company has the best interest in them.

    All of these people are out of touch with reality and suffer from a rare disorder of selective stupidity and ignorance to be able to live under the rainbow!

  60. For A Better Future. Kill The EAs. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep, I can confirm this. I even took part in it. Why? Because I know EA would respond to such an obvious troll. FOR THE SECOND TIME.
    As is a common saying around large parts of the internet these days, Successful Troll was Successful. (hell, even that might not be common these days any more)

    Not only that, they made themselves sound like bigger douches in their reply to it.
    I really cannot believe they would reply to it again. But I guess it is true that EA are so fragile right now that any remote hints of insult against them as a company can cause damage to them.
    Such a silly, pointless poll at that. Polls are always silly, but come on!

    The funniest part is the fact that nobody botted for EA so they never won. That is what really stands out. Not even one remotely large-ish community cares, and the others are too small and/or have no clue about programming.

  61. Isn't he... by Leptok · · Score: 1

    COO not CEO?

  62. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Its not. People still want to argue about it. We cant be any clearer â" its not. Period."
    Arguing like a 4 year old. Wooo adding the world period make it all sound final . --- is a period already.

    Is too. Period to the infinity. I win!!!

    "45 million registered users are proving that wrong."
    Um... how many would be registered if the games can be played without an Origin account.

    "Tens of millions more are playing and loving those games."
    Tell that to Zynga. That's your future.

    "Over the last three weeks, 900,000 SimCity players took us up on a free game offer for their troubles. "
    What other choices did they have? It's not like you would refund their digital purchase.

  63. Who the hell does he think he is? by JohnRoss1968 · · Score: 1

    'Many continue to claim the Always-On function in SimCity is a DRM scheme. It’s not. People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period"
    We gamers, Your customers, are telling you WE DO NOT WANT the Always-On function in Sim-City or ANY GAME. You can say its not a DRM scheme all day long.We dont care if you call it a DRM Scheme or a function or a bonus or whatever. WE DO NOT WANT ALWAYS-ON CRAP.
    You want our money? Remove the always-on crap. If you don't remove it you will NEVER get a penny from us PERIOD.
    How thickheaded can you possible be. People are telling you you don't want it and you are arguing with your customers about what it is.
    Who in the hell do you think you are?

    1. Re:Who the hell does he think he is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WE DO NOT WANT ALWAYS-ON CRAP.
      You want our money? Remove the always-on crap. If you don't remove it you will NEVER get a penny from us PERIOD.
      How thickheaded can you possible be

      The problem is that millions of people seems to be happy to give EA money even with always-on-non-DRM crap.

      I personally agrre and I am not buying simCity and the copy protection and online requirement is why. I love SimCity the game but I will not spend money on a company that abuses and distrusts the paying customer.

  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Work's too by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    I like to call it the Cheney effect, after the American Vice President and political pundit that perfected it. Strictly speaking it was Karl Rove's idea though. You just lie brazenly and publicly about something nobody really wanted to believe in the first place.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  66. That didn't take long. by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

    "We're going to try to stop and think before doing and saying stupid things."

    (a small amount of time passes)

    "This game that refuses to run unless you connect with our servers has no DRM, you're an idiot for thinking so, and we refuse to change it".

  67. Saying it doesn't make it true by melchoir55 · · Score: 1

    "People still want to argue about it. We can’t be any clearer – it’s not. Period. "

    In order to understand what a thing is, or what motivations and intentions are, we look to the action of an entity. We listen to the entity when it speaks because there is a chance it will point out some nuance of behavior we have missed. However, we do not accept assertions regarding action when those assertions are incongruous with those actions.

    EA is a member of the set of companies that believe they can do whatever they like so long as they claim they aren't doing anything wrong.

    Please, everyone, do the gaming community a favor and stop buying EA games.

  68. Screw us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw us, what about the development companies that spend years trying to get on board with ea only to be ground into the asphalt by their bullshit? We're complaining we don't get a fun game to pay? Screw us.

  69. Same crap... by DiEx-15 · · Score: 1

    ...Different day.

    So lets get this straight EA: The fact customers don't want microtransactions in single player games and actually want offline, single player games is immaterial because other FTP games are successful, never mind the fact those FTP games are MMOs?

    How in the name of [Insert deity you worship here or leave blank if you don't] has EA games not only survived this long with this level of incompetence AND beat Zynga for worst company?