Slashdot Mirror


H-1B Cap Reached Today; Didn't Get In? Too Bad

First time accepted submitter Dawn Kawamoto writes "Employers stampeding into the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service to get their H-1B petitions filed before the cap is reached are getting the door slammed in their face today. The cap was hit in near record time of 5 days, compared to the 10 weeks it took last year to have more than enough petitions to fulfill the combined cap of 85,000 statutory and advanced degree H-1B petitions. While U.S. tech workers scream that they're losing out on jobs as H-1B workers are hired, employers are countering that the talent pool is lacking and they need to increase the cap. Of course, Congress is wrangling in on this one as to whether it's time to raise the bar."

512 comments

  1. talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    talent pool is lacking = we don't want to pay

    1. Re:talent! by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sad but true.

      I'm willing to bet that the big H1-B heavy corps (Microsoft, Intel, Infosys, and similar) had people sitting at the door waiting in line, metaphorically speaking. They likely snatched up their maximums in less than an hour after opening.

      Good luck if you're a small operator, but at least the good news is the big guys made it easier to work with a lot of excellent-but-smaller companies.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    2. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, it has been a fairly interesting week. Let's see, got the jobs data right here, and it's a doozy: link

      Given those unemployment figures, it's kind of hard to argue that there is a lack of people in those fields seeking gainful employment. Oh, wait, I'm wrong; apparently, a large number of them have recently given up looking for work, as they simply couldn't find any, and thus are dropped from the count in the future (hurrah!).

      Personally, I can't wait until we see the past few months' employment figures readjusted, at some future date.

      But yeah, if you had to listen to the techs or business people on this one, the techs are probably telling it straight: they're being screwed. But that's alright, it's not like it's going to affect the security / whatever of our nation, as surely people will continue to enter into these great fields despite the now frequent hardships, right? Only no, it appears that a lot of programs seem to be having problems here. It warms the cockles of my heart to know that the US's CyberCommand will, in time, possibly be 100% foreign-born.

      Hey Congress, just keep doing what you've been doing. Fantastic job thus far, can't wait to see the results next quarter. Just know that a large, angry, and extremely vocal contingent of unemployed techs will certainly not spend their idle time trying to find ways to undermine you as you've undermined them. Nope, that'll never happen. Plus those are votes you can count on not getting on election day...not that it will matter with the kickbacks you will be earning for passing this crap...on the other hand, an untimely exposure of a scandal does tend to limit one's chances, and does cost a lot less. Price of a bought Senator? $5,000,000. Price of an Android phone? $300. Catching the good Senator making out with someone not his wife, and uploading it to YouTube? Priceless.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:talent! by NoKaOi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      talent pool is lacking = we don't want to pay

      So why not have a minimum salary for H1B employees? Increase with inflation every year of course.

      If an H1B is truly necessary because the talent is lacking, the presumably they'd be willing to pay. If it's because they only want to pay a foreigner $35k/yr for job with a market value of $70k/yr, then that's not what the H1B program is supposed to be about. Set the minimum at something like $80k/yr, and you'll be limiting it to folks who are really in high demand and the absolute in their field, otherwise you can hire an American.

      I mean, really, what talent is there that should pay less than $80k/yr that you really cannot find an American to hire for?

    4. Re:talent! by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      In my experience, it is mostly lacking. Sure, people are graduating from college with these shiny IT degrees, but for example I know of all too many IT graduates that can't even do something as basic as subnetting.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    5. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      (Microsoft, Intel, Infosys, and simila...

      When I see those assholes and others cry about the "lack of local talent" and see the out of work - willing and talented folks, I just shake my head and do what I have to. I have a 10 year old computer because I can't afford better. I have a 20 year old car because I can't afford better. I have student loans because I was told that if I "went up the food chain" and leave the low level jobs to overseas people the things would be better for me.

      I am sitting in a ton of student debt with no job prospects because I did what I was told was right - more education is better. NO, I don't have a PhD in Lit - almost as bad: MBA - I was hoping to get into tech mgt and be the PHB that actually knew about tech - ya know, the PHB that techies respected because I was there.

      Instead I'm told I was stupid for doing so. I was stupid for going back to school and I was a sucker.

      I am told that there's something wrong with me. I am told that I wouldn't be unemployed if I had the "skills".

      Really?

      Well folks, Java, C++,C,SQL, Windows 32/MFC.WPF,C#, Linux, Unix, OS/2 are all worthless skills! Because those are what I have.

      Wiling to have a book FedEx'ed from Amazon to cram to learn a new skill that the mgt decided to use after you were hired isn't worth anything.

      No, hiring mangers want you to know everything before hand.

      You know, I looked at current salaries and they're at about 70K for most higher level developers these days. Back in '99, those same developers were getting over 100K.

      Recently some friends of mine who are C++ guys jumped on jobs that paid 60K+ here in Metro Atl. They were making almost 100K at their previous job. But with all these H1Bs and others being imported, pay has been depressed and they got bills to pay - like student loans for that BSCS they paid through the nose for so that they could have job security.

      And in the meantime, Bill gates and Mark Fucker - Zuckerberg are begging kids to learn programming.

      I'm beginning to understand why people have become revolutionaries and followed some asshole who screwed everyone over after they took power - like Castro.

      Please excuse the grammar and spelling errors: I'm in a rage.

    6. Re:talent! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      It's not quite that simple.

      An H1b is paid a "reasonable" salary which is princely by their native countries standards.

      And the company gets to treat them as slaves and work them long hours because if they quit, they must find another job who can sponsor them for an h1b quickly or return home.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:talent! by Mitreya · · Score: 1

      talent pool is lacking = we don't want to pay

      So why not have a minimum salary for H1B employees? Increase with inflation every year of course.

      Good first step but not enough.
      Also, why not make it easy to transfer your H1B visa to a competitor? Otherwise, competitive pay or not, but what you get is an indentured servant who will be deported if fired.

    8. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Just because you have an "education" and can put a list of "skills" on a resume, that does not mean you're actually worth your salt. If you interview anything like how you type, I'm not at all surprised that you're frustrated.

    9. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      80k per year minimum. The big tech corps pay their H-1Bs more than that already. All this bitching about foreign workers stinks of racism more than reality. No doubt their are companies abusing this, but the companies always cited in the complaints (Microsoft, Amazon, Facebook) pay their H-1B (or TN1, E3, etc) workers more than the minimums that any one ever proposes.

      And yes, they do pay more than that IN REALITY.

    10. Re: talent! by okolialex · · Score: 1, Redundant

      (Moderators please delete my duplicate post above) Dang, that's scary. I left the business world (Accounting / Finance) to attain an MS in Software Engineering. I hope I have better fate after school.

    11. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The reason employers prefer H1B employees isn't due to salaries - they get paid competitive wages. The reason they prefer H1B employees is because, if you fire someone on an H1B, they have a very short window to find a new job in America before being deported. Which means they are very scared of losing their jobs, which means that if you tell them to work 12 hours a day, seven days a week, they will.

    12. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already a $60k/year legal minimum for H1. But you are right, by setting the minimum you should be able to separate cheap labor from really needed skilled workers. I think current limit is ridiculously low, and should be $100k/year. In fact just set it to $100k ($150k for companies wanting to obtain more than 500 such visas) and see what happens. I bet you won't even need any cap this way.

    13. Re:talent! by farrellj · · Score: 1

      True, and they ask for fantasy qualifications...or what they ask advertise for, and what the actual hiring person wants isn't always the same. I went to an interview in another city...took the train up, since the phone interviews with the HR people and such went great...then I got into the interview, and instead of a SysAdmin for Linux, the actual person doing the hiring wanted a programmer, but he wasn't allow to get one he was interviewing SysAdmins hoping to get a programmer!!! What at sh*thead he was! Waste of my time and money (Lunch, etc). HR Lies, Other applications lie and get jobs...and I sit fricking unemployed still. So maybe, I will just get into the Music Business...a lot more stable than the tech sector!!!! :-/

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    14. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly, but that said, I have had to interview nearly twenty "Computer Science Graduates" in the past year, and it is fucking appalling how these kids even got out of school. I mean, seriously. We're not talking about inability to do massive calculus functions or not knowing obscure algorithims.. we're talking people incapable of doing FizzBuzz and unable to program without a GUI. And when I say without a GUI, I mean they literally CANNOT CODE without dragging and dropping buttons on the screen.

      So. Yeah. BTW, the first two indian guys on H1-B potentials we interviewed, got it right off.

    15. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Reasonable should be no less than 50% ABOVE the median income of the area they are getting hired to work in. If the companies really can't get workers in that area, then they should be willing to pay more.

      You find me a job, ANY JOB, where they lack qualified applicants and I can show you a job where they don't pay enough.

    16. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given those unemployment figures, it's kind of hard to argue that there is a lack of people in those fields seeking gainful employment.

      Not that I'm in favor of H-1B visas or anything, but this isn't a good argument. It's possible for the economy as a whole to see high unemployment but for tech to have a small pool of available labor. I don't think this is the case, but you haven't made the point that it isn't.

    17. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They aren't stupid and they know this. Have you failed to notice impending 'war on hackers' just around the corner? Your little antics won't be quite as likely to happen when your either too scared to own an 'unlocked PC' (when it becomes illegal with harsh penalties), or you are getting ass raped by Bubba in jail. There is a large number of large black fellows in prisons up and down the country. If they knew about the tidal wave of hapless skinny nerdy types about the hit the prison system, I'm sure they would be practically salivating.

    18. Re:talent! by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 1

      talent pool is lacking = we don't want to pay

      So why not have a minimum salary for H1B employees? Increase with inflation every year of course.

      The H1-Bs being underpaid is their business model. Plus it doesn't hurt that if he's fired he's kicked out of the country--nothing like an employee who can't quit without being deported to keep the complaints from staff down...

      --
      Who did what now?
    19. Re:talent! by JamesRing · · Score: 1

      I didn't see this mentioned, but the sponsoring company has to make a Labor Condition Application for H-1B applicants. In this application they have to show that the visa candidate is going to be paid a salary at or above the "prevailing wage". Of course there are ways and means to avoid this but at least in principle is supposed to make a H-1B worker no more attractive to an employer than an American.

    20. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 1

      What projects outside of class did you participate in. You'll find those types of experiences are much more important than a high GPA in stuff you've been spoon fed. The most impressive candidates are ones who do well in school, but are also motivated enough to do things outside of the curriculum.
      From a practical view, employers want somebody who can solve new problems, like working on a university solar car project, run an auger tool lab to become the defacto "owner," and go to person for people needing data collection and interpretation. That not only shows the smarts but their ability apply and problem solve new ideas. I was very lucky to take an 8 month internship in San Jose, and because of the cost of living I slept on a friend's cousin's couch. But on the experience side, I helped design and improve a laser system used for hard drives. Because the company bought a crappy system I ran into a number of roadblocks that required some innovative thinking. I then was able to consistently deliver what the customers wanted, to the point where my mentor would just send people wanting experiments done to me and I was effictively the tool owner.. It was an incredible challenge trying to come up with novel ways to satisfy outrageous customer needs, but it created concrete proof that I was focused and adaptible enough to get things done. I chose not to join the company, but I got great letters of recommendation, and could honestly share interesting stories that the recruiting engineer could relate to. It showed my ambition to learn, how I approached problems, and my ability to come up with new ideas to deliver. Those types of interviews extremely revealing, and more interesting for the candidate and interviewer.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    21. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The issue of salary is easy to solve. Break the tie between the H1-B visa and the employer thus allowing the visa holder to easily switch to a different job. The market will then decide how much he is worth. Right now, yes, they are cheap. But they are cheap because their visa ties them exclusively to a single employer and that single employer represents the only hope the visa holder will ever get a green card.

    22. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also expect all techy types, as a group, to become increasingly stigmatised. Not just in a playground bullying, low social status kind of way like they are now, but positively hated by cops and authority figures, and demonised by the media. Expect to be harassed at airports for looking too geeky or still carrying a laptop instead of a locked down tablet. If you are an unemployed techy type ... well, let's just say you'd better start picking alternative countries. The trend of ever decreasing tolerance and harsher punishments for using a computer in ways which aren't intended (whether explicitly stated as illegal or not) will get magnified x 1000.

    23. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 2

      Back in early 2000 I remember working on a reflow oven on the production line. The CS guy was messing with the system to report MTBA/MTBE data. After the upgrade the reflow profile tester was no longer working. He had no clue why, So I just went into microsoft (98 I think) troubleshooting mode. One of the things I checked out were the IRQ settings, and noticed there was a conflict. Then I noticed he had plugged in his old palm pilot into the machine to charge it.
      I pulled the plug on that, and no issues. His response was "Oh wow, they don't teach you that in school"

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    24. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite whining. IT work is trivial stuff nowadays - kind of working at McDonalds. Grossly overpaid!

    25. Re:talent! by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 2

      What projects outside of class did you participate in. You'll find those types of experiences are much more important than a high GPA in stuff you've been spoon fed. The most impressive candidates are ones who do well in school, but are also motivated enough to do things outside of the curriculum.

      Fat lot of good this does when the poor guy is already out of school.

      Besides, how do you know that he didn't listen to a guy just like you? Why should he listen to you over them?

      The cool thing about Slashdot is there are lots of ideas and opinions around. The really shitty part about Slashdot is that there are lots of ideas and opinions around. Who the hell knows, really, what's good and what isn't?

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    26. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Babe, techs have been screaming about this for months, years even. You have come to the wrong website if you think you can play this game, and get away with it.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    27. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about hacking? Look, when you manage to get your GED, then you'll realize that 'hackers' like those portrayed in movies largely do not exist. What I am speaking of, simply, are the grass-roots activists and impromptu bartenders, as one Republican nominee found-out, that can catch you off-guard, using perfectly legal technology, in public places.

      And you know it will happen...because politicians will never stop being corrupt, nor will they ever stop appearing in public. This is every politician (not the guy with wings): link.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    28. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Increasingly stigmatized? Really? Holy sh*t, where have you been? For the last two years, we've been thrown under a bus, repeatedly! Demonized by the media? Name one computer-related incident where they haven't mentioned the person was a hacker, whether or not it turned out true? And the punishments handed out by the courts? Fuck, I could rip off the NY stock exchange for $50 billion, and get a lighter sentence, than reporting a bug in some company's latest software.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    29. Re: talent! by Colourspace · · Score: 1

      Sorry that you posted AC. Seem like someone I could get along with.

    30. Re:talent! by loom_weaver · · Score: 1

      For some actual salaries check out: http://www.h1bwage.com/

      Not sure how accurate it is but I'm in there.

    31. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, there's a trick to it. Something I came across, by accident, was something of an interesting read (i.e. was not something I went looking for). Apparently, a number of firms have requirements for special software that is only available through that firm...you can see where this is headed. So if the firm, which is posting the job, lists experience in this software, as a requirement, software that is not readily available to other native applicants...they manage to fulfill the letter of the law (they didn't find any 'qualified' applicants), while violating the spirit of the law.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    32. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Because the H1B program, in reality, is an indentured servitude program...? There are people, supposedly, who work here for 10 years, at abominable pay, yet never quite get that green card...

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    33. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind that. But employers would hate it. The green card is a source of artificial leverage over someone's salary. You take that away, they'll scream murder.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    34. Re:talent! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      I didn't see this mentioned, but the sponsoring company has to [...] show that the visa candidate is going to be paid a salary at or above the "prevailing wage".

      The sponsors already work around that. They give the poor sap a job title and description for position with a "prevailing wage" far lower than the work they're actually assigned.

      I wonder if a law making it a federal offense to assign, pay for, or allow the performance of work outside the job description on the application would be a game-changer? B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    35. Re:talent! by lightknight · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, the CS program I was in did not teach you much in the way of IT...kind of frightening if you think about it. I guess IT has been reclassified as some sort of trade in their minds, while CS is some sort of Ivory tower nonsense...

      But then, I thought a Bachelors would teach you more than it apparently does...and I am working on fixing that.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    36. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny pic. Except technology, or use thereof, which is legal one day has this funny habit of being not, tomorrow. Sometimes it doesn't have to even be explicitly illegal to get you arrested or worse.

    37. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty much, and you better believe it's going to get a whole lot worse.

    38. Re:talent! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      You don't have to actually have all the skills they ask for. You just have to lie about them. That is what the H1B placement companies do. Sometimes you get found out, and other times, nobody knows any better. At a local company, a guy did a phone interview and seemed to really know his stuff. Then when he showed up, he couldn't do anything, and spent hours a day calling back to the home office. it soon became apparent that they pulled the old bait and switch. Somebody else with an Indian accent did the tech interview, then they sent some poor slob who didn't know anything other than how to dial the 1-800 number, and yet they wanted to be paid $100 an hour for his time. He and his company got booted. But a less aware company would have just got fooled by these underhanded tactics.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    39. Re:talent! by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      But yeah, if you had to listen to the techs or business people on this one, the techs are probably telling it straight: they're being screwed.

      I hear that, lately, it's not just been manual laborers and techies that have bumped-by-a-H1B-worker problems. Now managers, salsemen, clericals, and a host of other categories are getting hit. If true, that might raise the pressure on Congress a bunch.

      Hey Congress, just keep doing what you've been doing. Fantastic job thus far, can't wait to see the results next quarter.

      Too bad a candidate has to be a citizen for the past 7 years (for the House) or 9 years (for the Senate) to be elected to Congress. B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    40. Re:talent! by tompaulco · · Score: 2, Informative

      The whole argument for H1b is that we can't find local labor for a particular niche of skills. The H1Bs they are bringing in are run of the mill programmers, database admins, IT admins and whatnot. There are literally hundreds of local candidates for each one of these positions filled by an H1b.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    41. Re:talent! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      That rationale goes both ways.

      It applies equally well to the half-price H1B as it does to anyone else.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    42. Re:talent! by ygtai · · Score: 1

      Many PhD professors, non-STEM, earn like $40K-60K. They may be the close to the top of their fields, but salary is still supply and demand in a free market. Companies want to reduce cost, that's how it is, unless they can really make a lot of profit.

    43. Re:talent! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > 80k per year minimum. The big tech corps pay their H-1Bs more than that already

      No they don't. You can't lie to us. We know better. We've seen this sh*t for ourselves.

      Considering that you are advocating the creation of a Jim Crow style underclass, your attempt to play the race card is really pathetic. If anything, it's the "so-called racists" here that are calling for social justice.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    44. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you have an "education" and can put a list of "skills" on a resume, that does not mean you're actually worth your salt. If you interview anything like how you type, I'm not at all surprised that you're frustrated.

      Head on! Anyone else noticed that throughout the whole rant of GP, he never mentioned once what/how he had done great things and made/save a lot of money in his previous jobs?

      GP has "Java skill" (whatever that means) and MBA, and still unable to land a job?! If I interview him, I would have asked why he gave up his previous job and went full-time for his MBA. Did he find doing hands-on work too tough for him and wanted a way out? Why didn't he get his MBA part time as many others would do?

      Did GP got into debt for the MBA? Or because he had not cleared his previous debt before enrolling his MBA? Either choice indicated poor judgement, planning and financial sense, not good for management positions at all.

      And the million dollar question would be, of course, what can GP bring to the company that other candidates can't? If he can't sell himself, how can anyone expect him to sell his project, his team, etc as a manager? What did he learn in his MBA?

    45. Re:talent! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Prevailing wage is already a joke WITHOUT H1b shenanigans. Prevailing wage is used to keep people from getting a raise when they really deserve one. If you have reached the "salary cap" for your position, in order to get a raise, you have to be changed to manager or director, even if you have no one to manage! The upside for HR is that if the highest paid programmer becomes the lowest paid programmer manager, then the average wage of the people in both of these positions goes DOWN.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    46. Re:talent! by tompaulco · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure what an IT degree is, but I wouldn't expect a college graduate to know subnetting coming out unless he happened to work in the computer lab. While college does teach you things, it is mostly there to teach you how to learn, so that when you get out in the real world and run into something that you haven't done before, you will be better equipped to learn it.
      If you want someone who knows subnetting right out of school hire from a trade school. If you want someone who will be able to troubleshoot an issue that he/she has never seen before, hire a college graduate.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    47. Re:talent! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Gorsh, 23 years of experience here, and never heard of FizzBuzz. But I guess it is not a test of development skills, but a child's game that they are failing to implement. That is pretty sad, considering I wrote a complete working Monopoly program in 16k on my TRS-80 in 7th grade.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    48. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, the H1-B managed to get through the interview process and the GP poster didn't. Draw your own conclusions.

      It is a huge pain to find qualified people.

    49. Re: talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... This already exists!

    50. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what is your strategy for this in addition to rage? I only know C and a little bit of C++/Java, yet I got 100K+ as a 2 year junior to senior software engineer on H1B. I know my pay is not high (not low either) in my company. And we are losing many people in the past year because they found better jobs so we have to hire more. Willing to come up with a new strategy, maybe relocate and pursue opportunities?

    51. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like we H1Bs do?

    52. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have legitimate complaints of course.

            But ignoring these for now (really sorry about that!) I'd truly like to know who suggested an MBA enhanced your chance of getting into technology _management_. It would be too cynical of me to suppose it was an MBA school - you would have understood this and mentioned it, as they are obviously just "marketing" their product and truth is not relevant to their sales plan.

            But someone else other than and MBA school thinking such a "degree" helps management at all, and most especially tech management?!? That's just bizarre. Did they work in a tech company (big or small)? Were they managers? Had they actually seen this work in practice or was this just theorizing? I am sorry, and concede I've never worked in government or a >50k staff organization, but the idea that a MBA would be viewed as enhancing one's (tech) management abilities just seems so "out there". I assume someone faintly credible suggested it to you, and I'd really be curious to hear a bit about whomever it was.

    53. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a perfect right to be in a rage. This is nothing but them lying for the purpose of dissolving your prospects so they can cut themselves even bigger checks. It's exactly what revolutions are made of.

    54. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that both sides are right. In the tech centers of the US, there is a pitiful lack of talent and H1-Bs are used to drive down wages.

      What we need is to eliminate H1-Bs entirely. In their place, US companies should be able to sponsor citizenship for foreign-born talent with no caps. Companies would no longer be able to claim a shortage of talent. And tech workers would no longer be able to claim that H1-Bs were driving down wages. The key is that workers would be aligning their future with ours rather than exploiting a system that both takes advantage of the foreign workers, who are hired at below-market rates, and takes advantage of the US job market to provide the equivalent of many years of work overseas in just a couple of years here.

    55. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, I looked at current salaries and they're at about 70K for most higher level developers these days. Back in '99, those same developers were getting over 100K.

      So, one possibility is that you are living in some depressed area if these developers have general technical skills - move to the Silicon Valley because that certainly hasn't happened there. Of course, if these developers haven't picked up new skills in the intervening 14 years, I'm surprised they can even make $70K.

      Or, perhaps those "same developers" were not really "higher level" developers if measured by skill vs. years of experience or had a "special" skill such as web design (a highly overhyped area in '99) or were COBOL programmers pulled out of the dustbin to deal w/Y2K in legacy systems and those skills are no longer as in demand. In '99, the requirements for $100K jobs in the Silicon Valley were pretty low because of an absurd imbalance and a lot of people got spoiled and began to think they were pretty hot shit when they weren't. Most of these people had the sense by 2004 to have gotten out of the development side of the house, but I can understand that those that didn't and are delusional are not happy anymore.

    56. Re:talent! by thoth · · Score: 1

      So why not have a minimum salary for H1B employees?

      They do have minimums, but companies skirt them anyway. Shocking, I know.

      I can't find the article which summarized it nicely, but if I recall, it boiled down to listing multiple tiers of jobs - e.g. junior employee, mid-level employee, senior employee with various salary ranges. Then, as long as the average of all that somehow equaled the prevailing wages in the area, the hiring company could somehow miraculously ONLY find candidates for the junior jobs!

      And as for "that's not what the H1B program is supposed to be about". Well YEAH. Problem is, corporations are essentially full-time dedicated to looking for any way around the law.

    57. Re:talent! by Sc4Freak · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's pretty well known that all of the big tech companies pay quite well. In the pacific northwest (Amazon, Microsoft) H-1B salaries for graduates with 4-year bachelor's degrees start at around $100k, fresh out of college. It's even higher in Silicon Valley (Facebook, Google, Apple, etc.), although it's offset by higher living costs.

    58. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that a factory line worker is rarely good at things like understanding fault tolerance and performance in a distributed system so the overall employment numbers mean nothing to this issue.

      I've interviewed a lot of developers over the years and those who loudly claim to have "skills" usually don't. Those that do stuff and can write a functioning 20 line multithreaded concurrent program on the whiteboard (with allowances for all the stuff the compiler would catch for you - I don't care about those sort of errors) w/o introducing race conditions are the people I want and they tend not to be bragging about their skills (mostly, I suspect, because they are happily employed or happily unemployed and are just looking around for something interesting to work on).

      Very few of the successful applicants I've interviewed in the past ten years were born in the US and most came over on an H1B initially. Those born in the US were mostly useless (some exceptions of course).

      And, BTW, I was born and raised in the US as all my grandparents were so this state of affairs alarms me. If we don't suck the talent out of other countries, we are doomed because, for some reason, few Americans are now willing to work hard enough to get a good education in a STEM area. I suspect most fell by the wayside in elementary school where, with the exception of the private schools filled with offspring of Tiger Moms, every student is "special" and we don't use Red Pens to grade tests and homework because that's "too harsh" and we think that "collaborating in groups" on math problems is really a good way to learn math in fourth grade (hint, it's NOT - nor is it a good way to teach kids that they are responsible for their answers and that their eventual employer isn't expecting to hire three people to do one job in hopes that they will work together and stumble on a correct answer).

    59. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is, of course, true of some. However in the higher tech companies that build stuff like distributed systems that must work or there's hell to pay, this is not the case. Perhaps we should set the bar higher for entry, but it should not be based on some artificial count. If an H1B worker can do a job better than available talent, bring them in.

      Perhaps we need a H1B tax that increases the cost of H1B's sufficiently that the tax swamps any possible savings in salary for companies that lowball H1B applicants (I've never worked at a company that did -- we of course liked to avoid H1B's if we could due to the legal costs, but we hired the best person for the job and paid them what we would have paid anyone and gave raises based on merit without regard for H1B status). That should end the debate.

    60. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $80K is nothing in the SF Bay Area (in fact, for a family of four with one breadwinner, it's within $5K of qualifying your family for low income housing). But, I agree with the notion (perhaps a tax of $50% of the prevailing wage would be appropriate for an H1B tax -- that would be beyond any wage savings that an employer could manage by gaming the H1B system).

    61. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem is a simple geographical problem.

      If you have the skills you claim to have, you will have zero problem getting a $100k+ job in San Francisco or the Silicon Valley. The talent shortage here is absolutely ridiculous. My department has been forced (by upper management and HR) to hire candidates that literally couldn't solve FizzBuzz. And every single position is $100k+ and comes with an annual 20% bonus and a reasonable grant of RSUs. Most programmers here, when you consider base compensation + bonus + stocks are pulling in over $150k in taxable income.

      A bit of a digression...my 10-year-old step brother recently saw a game that I'd written for my iPhone and wanted to know how I did it. Not being a sadist, I decided to teach him a bit of Python instead of Objective-C. I sat with him for 2 hours and showed him the basics. Just for fun, I decided to give him FizzBuzz to see what would happen. 6 minutes later (I timed him), he had written a perfect solution without any additional help from me. Consider that for a second...my company has hired and is paying 6 figures to more than a few people who are less capable programmers than an admittedly-precocious 10-year-old boy with 2 hours of training.

      And then I come on /. and hear people whining about how there's no jobs...which I don't doubt that they truly believe, but you have to admit that there is a massive disconnect going on. So please, if you've got skills, consider finding a way to work here some of the time. Companies here are so hard up for talent that many would accept a worker that telecommutes 80% of the time from Atlanta and flies in for the other 20%. Budget $10k-$20k for airfare and hotels for the year and your salary will still be much higher than you'll find there.

    62. Re:talent! by savuporo · · Score: 1

      Ive been in US for 3 years, now both converting my visa to H1B and runnig green card process in parallel. I have to say, for a country almost fully populated by immigrants, the approach to immigration is surprisingly tiresome and convoluted.
      If my company wasnt paying me so well, and going out of their way to keep me here i would have given up a long time ago.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    63. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You find me a job, ANY JOB, where they lack qualified applicants and I can show you a job where they don't pay enough.

      That's BS. Perhaps in your work as a Walmart checker, that's true. It may be true for garbage collectors. It may even be true for network techs.

      However, it's very hard to find great developers at any price. By a extension of your logic, if two companies needed someone with Einstein's insight, they could simply both "pay enough" and Einstein would have cloned himself into three people (one continuing to do what he did) or two other people would have decided to learn what they needed to have such insight.

      It's not about if you "know Java". For example, in some jobs you must be able to deal with large complex problems while still being able to dive into enough detail to find nasty problems (such as hardware design flaws that occur only once every few years on a single processor when running your product). That's a rare skill that requires a certain personality type and can't be taught to someone who doesn't have that personality type (or, perhaps, defect) at ANY price. There are simply too few such people to fill the demand in the United States.

      If you don't understand this and are trying to get into the computer field because the Walmart checker job isn't paying you enough but some sharp H1B takes every tech job you apply for, you may want to look inside yourself for the source of the problem, not at the H1B program.

    64. Re:talent! by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      It is 6 years max, not 10. After that they have to go back and can't extend H1B anymore. Also, any experience gained at your current job cannot be used to qualify you for a green card, which is the only way to stay and keep working after 6 years on H1B. Also, if they are fired or quit they have 10 days to get he fuck out and technically that time cannot be used to find another job and just is a grace period for travel arrangements to leave the country.

    65. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, good developers don't need to be "told" to work 12 hours a day, seven days a week. They love what they do and can't leave a problem unsolved and sleep at night -- sure, they may take a day off occasionally, but you're hiring the wrong devs or have the wrong environment if you often have to "tell" someone to work past eight hours a day, five days a week.

    66. Re:talent! by russotto · · Score: 1

      If you have the skills you claim to have, you will have zero problem getting a $100k+ job in San Francisco or the Silicon Valley. The talent shortage here is absolutely ridiculous.

      Unfortunately, so is the cost of living.

      And then I come on /. and hear people whining about how there's no jobs...which I don't doubt that they truly believe, but you have to admit that there is a massive disconnect going on.

      Wait until you're out of a job. Look around and see what you can find. Forget about big-name tech firms, you might be qualified but (unless you're already at or have been at another big name firm) unable to get their attention. What you'll find is virtual acres of job ads specifying requirements that no one is likely to actually meet, with (if they have numbers listed at all) ridiculously low salaries. And if you send resumes out to those, you hear nothing back from nearly all of them.

    67. Re:talent! by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      That is SOOOO the wrong attitude to have, and exactly why nobody would hire you. I learned most of what I know about networking from college. If you go to an interview and you can't show them that you can subnet, they'll dismiss you in a heartbeat. If everybody who is complaining against H-1B visas is like you, then it's no wonder they can't find a job.

      I remember hearing an incident about how an employer asked a recently graduated student to demonstrate to him how he would wire and then configure a cisco router and two switches with a quickly improvised scenario. The student walked into their rack room, and the first thing he asked was which one is the router.

      The kid may as well have been Albert Einstein. The fact of the matter though is that the employer doesn't need Albert Einstein. He needs somebody to manage his information infrastructure. If you want to focus on theory with your CS degree, your best bet is to work at a university like that Ph.D who was featured in the recent slashdot article. Although you may understand the technology, you have no idea how to implement it, which doesn't make you marketable at all.

      Also, an IT degree isn't necessarily even a degree, though many are offered. At my local community college they offer about 8 of them, to include Linux Systems Administration and Network Systems Administration, which necessitate all of the liberal arts, humanities, and science classes like any other associates degrees. Then there are also the certificates of completion for the technology only tracks.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    68. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a H1-B and I'm paid about 80% of what the average gets paid, in one of those big IT tech companies.
      So yeah, I guess you're right. Note that, that 80% is approx 100% what I would get in europe; so I'm not making any "more" money. In fact, I lose some due to the 401k being in the US.
      I mostly went there for the opportunity to meet all the IT people who all happen to be.. in that same area.

    69. Re:talent! by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      "However, it's very hard to find great developers at any price."

      Funny, "any price" always seems to be 20K less than what I'm currently making.

    70. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then again I work H1B for a big company like that, they told me "you don't have to care for the cap, we'll take care of it"

      And sure enough, i entered the US on H1B way after the cap was reached. They said it's normal, some places are reserved. I have no idea if that stuff is legal or not, to be honest. They said it is. I don't know what they exactly did.

      Obvious AC.

    71. Re:talent! by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      Uh, it's pretty well known that 6 of the top 10 H1-B consumers are companies BASED in Inda. Amazon is not even in the top 20. Neither is Facebook or Apple.

    72. Re:talent! by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      They also don't have families and reproduce via spores.

    73. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with Billly Gates here even if he is an ass half the time on here.

      Without experience your resume goes right in the trash. $60,000 is a lot of money for an employer as $60,000 costs $100,000 in taxes and overhead. If you have just a masters and have never managed a team you sure as hell wont get what you want. Maybe a JR programming/analyst position for 50% that. Do it for 3 years and apply elsewhere and mention the MBA. You will be making $70,000 and being a manger in no time like in 5 years.

      Entry level jobs well they pay entry level and have many applicants willing to do anything not to work at BestBuy anymore so the wages will frankly be terrible starting until the economy improves. That will take many years to clear the glut.

    74. Re:talent! by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      If you managed to save the thing to that damn cassette drive, I'm impressed.

    75. Re:talent! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Reasonable should be no less than 50% ABOVE the median income of the area they are getting hired to work in. If the companies really can't get workers in that area, then they should be willing to pay more.

      You find me a job, ANY JOB, where they lack qualified applicants and I can show you a job where they don't pay enough.

      Problem with that argument is then they can just outsource to India where they can just pay INdian wages and get a nice tax tax cut doing so as money that stays there is not seen by the IRS.

      If you start messing with this it will only encourage more outsourcing.

    76. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And techs have been (at least partially) wrong about this for months, years even. The difference between H1-Bs and people screaming about this? The H1-Bs are willing to move to where the jobs are.

      If you're not in a tech center of the US and you're complaining about lack of tech jobs, I'm not feeling all that sympathetic.

    77. Re:talent! by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Not to sound dickish, but if you were willing to accept that position you would not be unemployed.

      Unless of course they wanted to pay you $32,000 a year or something so absurdly silly. I had to lower my standards, yet I realize I am not in a position to demand what I once was worth when so many are out of work and were happy to take that fake programmer job because the repo man is looking for his car, wife ready to leave, and house 1 month from being taken away!

      I am planning to leave the I.T. industry anyway as I see by 2020 we will all be using tablets with cloud exchange, cloud hosted proprietary apps, cloud Active Directory over VPN, with attached monitors and keyboards. Explain why business needs an I.T. department?

      After all they do not have a plumbing or electrical department? They just pay a bill.

      I.T. is dying and is so 20th century. I hope I am wrong but we are seen as cost drainers who do not add any value to the bottom line. Engineers know do business processing stuff. So I am becoming a teacher instead. You can't outsource that.

    78. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop talking out of your ass.

      I work for a large company with a ~$16b market cap. I know for a fact that we pay most, if not all, of our H1-Bs over $100k/year. Hell, we pay our outsourced developers in China an average of around $60k/year. There may be some companies that abuse the system, but GP is right that the big ones (basically any company whose name you've heard) aren't the ones doing it.

    79. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Well folks, Java, C++,C,SQL, Windows 32/MFC.WPF,C#, Linux, Unix, OS/2 are all worthless skills! Because those are what I have.

      OS/2? Seriously??

    80. Re: talent! by kellymcdonald78 · · Score: 1

      The MBA degree was initially developed specifically to give engineers a business background so they could move into executive management. When I did mine a full 70% of students were from an engineering or tech background. In the 3 years since I graduated almost everyone I keep in touch with is now in management

    81. Re: talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you are thinking of L-1B which is an intra company transfer. That is not the same as an H1B. L1Bs are highly scrutinized by USCIS and US Consulates abroad for that reason. What you are referring to is "specialized knowledge."

    82. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally, it's not so much a "tough test" , but a view into how the candidate solves problems and programs. We're not looking for awesome revolutionary answers. We're looking for basic skills, knowledge of algorithms and flow controls, how to get around the IDE, etc.

      I'm sure you'd have no problem implementing it with 23 years. If you did Monopoly, you definitely have this ;)

    83. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well aren't you fine communist? Why do you hate America?

      How are wealthy CEO's supposed to reduce IT budgets if they have to pay more?

    84. Re:talent! by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      If you have the skills you claim to have, you will have zero problem getting a $100k+ job in San Francisco or the Silicon Valley.

      $100K in Silly Valley is equivalent to about $50K in most parts of the country. You're not coming out ahead when you have to spend three-quarters of your after-tax income for the rent on a crappy studio apartment.

    85. Re:talent! by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      You have tech skills, but you don't have any people network skills. Put your resume on Linked-in and start linking to everyone you used to know in university, college and previous jobs. Create a web site and start a Free project or join the Linux kernel developers and blog about your work on your own web site. After a few months, you will have a job.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    86. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have had to interview nearly twenty "Computer Science Graduates" in the past year, and it is fucking appalling how these kids even got out of school.

      Surprise, surprise. Higher education is yet another thing in modern America that keeps going up in price while the quality keeps dropping.

    87. Re:talent! by paper+tape · · Score: 1

      Companies use H1B and L1 visas as a method of bringing in cheap foreign labor.

      First they post a job with outrageously high requirements for a lowball salary.

      The only local workers who can do it are currently employed (often at the same company) for better money, so they won't take it.

      The company "can't find" any local talent, so they bring in a foreign worker on an L1 or H1B visa who doesn't meet the job requirements either - but will do the job they actually wanted done, for an even lower salary.

    88. Re:talent! by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      If your job description requires Superman, then that's a problem with your job description, not the applicants. Split it up into manageable parts and hire multiple employees. And the H-1Bs aren't Superman either, no matter what their recruiters tell you. You do realize that the recruiters have their own agenda that doesn't match your company's, don't you?

    89. Re:talent! by JDG1980 · · Score: 1

      The jobs that can be reasonably outsourced to India already have been. If an IT job is still being done in the US, it's being done here for a reason.

    90. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So. Yeah. BTW, the first two indian guys on H1-B potentials we interviewed, got it right off.

      Bullshit, especially on the first two indian guys.
      I am working with people from IBM and Satyam, these guys are the most clueless people I have ever seen.
      One of their dba told me they couldn't run a select count(*) from foo and they corrected it by running select * from foo.
      IBM ETL senior dev, couldn't code a simple "trigger a SP, extract the result, publish a file" flow correctly. Needed 3 iterations. They let production servers to crash because of the lack of spaces, not once, but multiple times.

      That's the reality of indian outsourcing, it's fucking scary.

    91. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for an American company and I'm on the TN status, which is like a more limited H1-B. As a new grad, my yearly salary is $90k/yr, which as far as I know is around the same range as my American colleagues.

    92. Re:talent! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      That is the one thing that is changing.

      Indian wages are now inflating about 20% per year.
      Chinese wages are inflating between 100% on the low end to 12%+ on the high end.

      Another 4-6 years and it won't make sense to use them any more.

      And the boomers and chinese boomers have started retiring. Things will get better but it will probably be 2016 before it really starts to gain steam.

      On the boomer front, 5 million went on social security in 2010 and 2011. That compares to 5 million pre-boomers who went on social security from 2000 to 2009.

      an extra 800k retire each of the next 4 years. Then an extra 1.6million extra per year every year after that for 15 years.

      I just hope it's in time for the gen-x and other kids behind the boomers.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    93. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you know this, file a Qui tam lawsuit. You could get a big payday.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qui_tam

    94. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      talent pool is lacking = we don't want to pay

      they only want to pay a foreigner $35k/yr for job with a market value of $70k/yr

      [Citation Needed]

      I'm applying for an H1B this year, the Labor Condition Agreement certified for my case says minimum wage of 85k, my contract says 95k + bonuses...
      Where do you get those numbers?

      By the way, I'm pretty sure I'd make more than 35k on unemployment support in my home country :)

    95. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Very true. One of the proposals to fix this (in CIR) is to allow a "H1B worker's rights" type thing, where workers will be able to move across jobs freely. Everyone wins (except greedy employers): citizens can get hired easier because H1B workers aren't that much better to hire than American workers any more; and H1B workers don't feel like indentured servants tied to one employer.

    96. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the foreigner will get instructed how to do that if for some reason he still doesn't know it, but if the local doesn't have it on the resume he's sent back out to shit creek.

      It's this kind of thing that explains exactly why you have people with extraneous bachelor's degrees working at fast food, Walmart, driving cabs or buses, and hefting boxes for delivery companies. They'd much rather be doing what they went to school for and getting paid better, but gotta do something to pay for things (including loan debt) somehow. They don't show up as unemployed, but too much talent is squandered in this country as opportunity to gain experience is tossed out the window.

    97. Re:talent! by superwiz · · Score: 1

      Pay is hardly an issue. They get to hire people for whom getting fired is equal to deportation. They are in every way indentured servants. If they are good enough to get an H1-B, they should get a green card. At least, this way, US citizens wouldn't have to compete with them on sub-standard work-environment and work conditions.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    98. Re:talent! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Well then won't you be happy to find out that this law already exists. If my current company wanted to hire my friend who is H1B, they had to pay him the same as everyone else and then $5000 more for H1B sponsorship costs. Literally, they would have had to pay out the same for him as for me and I have tons of lead and architect experience and he did not.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    99. Re:talent! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Your first statement is not true. They have to pay them the same, not a princely sum by their native standards.

      Your second statement is absolutely true. They can be treated like sweatshop employees where American workers can't (since they'll just leave).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    100. Re:talent! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Also, any experience gained at your current job cannot be used to qualify you for a green card, which is the only way to stay and keep working after 6 years on H1B.

      I don't know what you mean by this. The H1Bs I know absolutely are working on green cards as part of the H1B program.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    101. Re:talent! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      This would actually be a great fix, because this is the greatest advantage an H1B has over a US worker.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    102. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > IBM ETL senior dev, couldn't code a simple "trigger a SP, extract the result, publish a file" flow correctly. Needed 3 iterations. They let production servers to crash because of the lack of spaces, not once, but multiple times.

      The true WTF here is that you don't test before uploading to the production servers.

    103. Re:talent! by PRMan · · Score: 1

      My last job was full of H1Bs. I eventually found out that my H1B friend, who was actually junior to me by a decade got paid MORE than me. I was surprised, but the company was very afraid of not paying "prevailing wage". And both of us made more than my boss (he told me himself). So I'm just not really seeing what you're saying.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    104. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 1

      Surprisingly, the CS program I was in did not teach you much in the way of IT...kind of frightening if you think about it. I guess IT has been reclassified as some sort of trade in their minds, while CS is some sort of Ivory tower nonsense...

      A good CS program has always been an ivory tower of math, logic, and theory. But HR folks aren't really good at distinguishing between similar degrees like CS, EE, IT, and Computer Engineering. Yes there's some crossover, but there are some major differences in focus.

      But then, I thought a Bachelors would teach you more than it apparently does...and I am working on fixing that.

      Undergrad classes are all about getting the basic tools. That's why it's important to mix in technical extra curricular activities (eg robot design competitions), or find a professor that you can work with on projects. It makes for much more interesting conversations with interviewers, and good stories that reveal your problem solving skills and personality.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    105. Re:talent! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      It warms the cockles of my heart to know that the US's CyberCommand will, in time, possibly be 100% foreign-born.

      Why is this a problem? The French Foreign Legion is one of France's elite military regiments, and is full of foreign-born individuals.

    106. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well folks, Java, C++,C,SQL, Windows 32/MFC.WPF,C#, Linux, Unix, OS/2 are all worthless skills! Because those are what I have.

      You and thousands of others. Seriously: every job you apply for, there's 100 other people with nearly identical paper skill sets right next to you. Gives an employer a lot of power to choose the least expensive, the least bitter, the least likely to talk about armed revolution. And all it takes is one out of that hundred willing to work for below-market wages to depress market wages.

      That's the phenomenon that led to the rise of unions: individual employees, making rational decisions about their own position, will undercut each other in a race to the bottom. (foreign workers not required.) Tech workers won't ever unionize - the lone-wolf image is too strong; IT/programming departments don't have the numbers; techies like to think they're Professionals - but some kind of structure to prevent tech workers from cutting each others' throats would help transfer profits from executives to workers.

    107. Re:talent! by microTodd · · Score: 1

      An honest question: where are you at? Northeast? West Coast? Seattle? The South (Austin)?

      I'm trying to find talent in the Southeast...I'm willing to pay well. I haven't found anyone I would consider acceptable (trainable maybe). And I've seriously been searching for over 6 months.

      I really wonder if geographic location plays one of the most significant roles in all this, and most people overlook that.

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    108. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gotta love when the #1 defenders of free market whine about how free market is screwing their jobs. So, let me get this straight, when free market helps you, then is good, when it doesn't is bad. On the other hand, are you comparing salaries to those of silicon valley during the bubble? Really?

    109. Re:talent! by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      If what you are saying is true, then we need to outlaw universities and make everybody go to trade schools and community colleges, where they can turn out IT factory workers who are trained in a task, not how to figure out how to do a task.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    110. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I make 115K in the C++ embedded medical devices world.

    111. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer here would rather be to allow H1-B's at any company that's willing to hire them w/o any red tape.

    112. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sole Sourcing is the term for this.

    113. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it happens before the sap is hired. They low ball the position's salary - competent citizens balk at the wage, business has shown they did their due diligence and say I need the visas - we can't fill the position.

    114. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has experience with half of an OS

    115. Re:talent! by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      For project budgeting purposes, ours went for $60 per hour while the united states workers went for $90. No idea what the difference was but at a budgeting level, the company treated them differently.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    116. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm 35 and I've been laid off five times at this point...I like to work at startups, so it's kinda part of the game. Two of those were 'end of the road' meetings where I was in the last group let go before the company went belly up and the other three were earlier waves. The first couple were harder because I hadn't built up a network yet. But I was creative (I searched for press releases from companies that just secured their series A or B funding and contacted them to see if they were looking for developers with my skill set before they had a chance to post their openings) and I interviewed a lot and found jobs after a month or two. After I'd built a network, finding a new position was as simple as firing off an email to a bunch of people seeing who had a need. At this point, LinkedIn has made it even simpler. Of course now that my last startup got acquired by a $16b company, recruiters won't stop pestering me with new job offers. I ignore most, but the ones that look interesting get forwarded to my network.

      I'm so sick of tech workers feeling entitled to high-paying jobs without doing the work, and I don't mean tech work. You have to make friends at your jobs...especially the really talented folks...it's not that hard. You don't even have to make friends with the non-tech people, though I'd encourage that too. And here's the important part...help those friends find jobs. Over the years, I've connected with a few recruiters that are friendly, knowledgeable and care about finding the right placement. So whenever I see emails from friends saying they're available, I fire off an InMail with an anonymous description of my friend's background and ask if they've got any ideas. They trust me because a) I've personally made them a bunch of money and made their clients very happy and b) I've sent them quality candidates in the past. My friends trust me because a) they know, like and respect me and b) I actively try to find them the right job when they need one. Over the past few years, I've made between $5 and $15k per year in referral bonuses. And when I'm ready to take the next step in my career, either because I decide one of my ideas has potential and get entrepreneurial or because I take a position as a VPE or CTO (I've had offers, but it never felt right), I now have a huge network of quality people to draw on to make me successful in that.

      It's really frustrating to see techies whining about how there are no $100k+ jobs in some part of the country with low cost of living and blaming the H1-Bs for that. Guess what...the H1-Bs suck it up and move to the bay area. The live in Freemont, Hayward or other such place that requires a 1+ hour commute because they know they need to save as much as they can, as fast as they can. It might suck, but so does being unemployed. Companies here would love for US workers to have half the work ethic that these folks do.

      Oh...and you trotted out the cost of living argument...how quaint. Firstly, there are places you can live here that are very affordable. I lived in the Presidio for 5 years with 3 roommates and paid $643/mo (max...they made slight adjustments each year) in rent. Now, I've got a ~$6000/mo mortgage, but that's only because I chose a 15-year fixed loan and decided to get a 4 bedroom. I rent two of them out, which brings in $2250/mo. But see, I can afford it because I saved up ~40% of the down and I've put in the work described above. When a recruiter had an opening for a company that was very likely to succeed if they could execute, she thought of me. And after I played a huge role in that execution, we got acquired. Now, my monthly options vest is roughly 4 times my mortgage and my salary starts with a 2 (before 20% annual bonus.) I'll build up a nice portfolio until I'm done vesting and then I'll have the freedom and contacts (the senior leadership variety...they have connections to the money) to either start something of my own or take a tech leadership position at an early-stage startup that's just been funded. Or, hell, I could probably retire somewher

    117. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't be content with $100k. See my comment above for how to do this. My effective compensation is just under $500k at this point and that's not an accident...apply your "most parts of the country" equivalency test to that number.

      I can sympathize with people who've put down roots, started a family or are otherwise tied to somewhere without jobs, though my first comment mentioned that you can find high-paying jobs here that will accept an 80% telecommute arrangement. But anyone who just starting out or has the flexibility to move has no excuse. And if we're to believe the /. memes, that's most of you (the crappy studio apartment is likely nicer than the parents' basement, though you have to learn to cook for yourself and do your own laundry ;-)

    118. Re: talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang, that's scary. I left the business world (Accounting / Finance) to attain an MS in Software Engineering. I hope I have better fate after school.

      Only if you are willing to work for an investment bank or hedge fund thereby selling your soul for a few pieces of silver. Eventually you will be tossed to the curb as the investment bank or hedge fund seeks to reduce labour expenses.

      By the way, I have a BA (Natural Sciences/Mathematics) which includes a heavy load of computer science courses, 15+ years working experience, extensive analytical skills plus the various skills which should be valuable for data analysis. Yet I am unemployed. I should have joined the local biker gang directly out of high school; they have a comprehensive "retirement plan".

    119. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your problem is a simple geographical problem.

      If you have the skills you claim to have, you will have zero problem getting a $100k+ job in San Francisco or the Silicon Valley. The talent shortage here is absolutely ridiculous. My department has been forced (by upper management and HR) to hire candidates that literally couldn't solve FizzBuzz.

      By FizzBuzz do you mean http://www.dr-mikes-math-games-for-kids.com/fizz-buzz.html? Really? No wonder people won't work for your company if you treat them like children.

    120. Re:talent! by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      If you have problems finding job as an experienced Java, C++ or C# programmer, you might want to move: There's plenty of cities in the US where programmers are well in demand and senior people make 6 figures. Forget the bay area, try the midwest.

      Now, if there's a problem with the job market among programmers is that few are willing to risk entry level hires: Companies that have a high demand for high skill people are just unwilling to take risks on the young. So many places around here where 25 year olds are junior team members.

    121. Re:talent! by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      No, it's not. There's no data anywhere that indicates that H-1B visa workers earn less than local talent. There's also no data that suggests that companies like to hire them because they are trapped to one company. They hire them because they either can't afford a CS degree, or don't want to. Rather they understand infrastructure, and have hands on experience with actually implementing infrastructure. CS majors do no such thing. They understand the theory of infrastructure, but they can't actually implement it.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    122. Re:talent! by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      The general jobs data tells you jack about, say, employment for programmers. If unemployment is very high among people without a degree, or just degrees of liberal arts, that will make unemployment rates look pretty high, while you might actually be short of more specialized workers. How is unemployment for brain surgeons? Any developer with 3 years of experience will have no trouble finding a job around here at all.

      So, if you want to talk about bad unemployment numbers that are affected by H1-B, at the very least link to detailed data. It's not as if people are hiring H1-Bs to work at Abercrombie.

    123. Re:talent! by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      No, we don't outlaw anything. We allow people to make their choice, even if it is a poor one. That is what freedom is all about. What we shouldn't allow is government to give unconditional loan guarantees to career paths that are almost guaranteed to go nowhere. That isn't limited to CS, that also applies to e.g. philosophy, music theory, or other liberal arts/humanities degrees, and even law degrees since there are upwards of six times as many lawyers graduating each year than there are an actual need for them.

      That isn't to say that you can't do well in these fields by the way. I'm sure if you are good enough at CS, you'll do quite well. But the reality is that most people aren't that good at what they claim to be passionate about.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    124. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racist? More like, jealous. What I see here is poor people complaining about H1-B workers getting exploited, when in fact it's these complainers who had never had a chance at these jobs. If you guys really cared about H1-B workers getting exploited, you'd have known the laws and not make stupid "improvements" that have already been implemented.

    125. Re:talent! by hibiki_r · · Score: 1

      Sure, you can request experience that will only fit a specific H1-B candidate, but that involves 2 details:

      1) First, the H1-B needs the experience on the tech, which typically means he's already been working for the firm, typically in a work-study fashion. At that point, why go and hire someone new, when you have a guy you are happy with in house?

      2) You still have to pay them the prevailing rate. You could argue about whether each regional prevailing wage makes sense, but the rule is still in use. You won't be able to pay an H1-B programmer 30K, even if the poor guy would accept such a ridiculous rate. This affects green cards too: If you try to sponsor someone for a green card as an EB-2, you better be paying him a decent rate.

      The best way to improve the H1-B system is to shorten Green Card lines. Many people become H1-Bs hoping for eventual permanent residency. Today, that route can take you a decade, depending on your experience. And during that decade, changing jobs is tough. Let them get a green card faster, and suddenly the H1-B is not any cheaper.

    126. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a difference between an academic degree and job training. A degree is meant to give you background in a subject area; it's not a how-to manual. You still need experience/training in your field.

    127. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 1

      Fat lot of good this does when the poor guy is already out of school.

      Many universities have opportunities even for graduates. Hit the career center, or he can knock on the door of a professor he knows. Most of them are happy to get volunteer labor, even if it's just a few hours a week. And it's probably a better use of time to actually be doing something meaningful, rather than just reading yet another book which doesn't pay either.
      When I started as a computer engineering student, I was able to find out through a friend that his professor was looking for somebody to build a program that displayed Pourbaix diagrams of systems. I volunteered for the project, and not only did I have a tangible project I could point to, I also had somebody who would give me a letter of recommendation if I needed it. In the process I learned a lot about galvanic corrosion, which got me interested in Materials Science and I switched majors.

      Besides, how do you know that he didn't listen to a guy just like you? Why should he listen to you over them?

      There's no specific reason he should listen to me, but I feel my input could be helpful either to him or the community

      The cool thing about Slashdot is there are lots of ideas and opinions around. The really shitty part about Slashdot is that there are lots of ideas and opinions around. Who the hell knows, really, what's good and what isn't

      You don't, but at least getting constructive feedback can help somebody who is desperate. They might not take the advice, but it gives them another opinion to consider.
      I was just sharing my personal experiences, both from when I was a new grad and as part of a hiring team later in my career.

      Most interviews I've participated in were not "pop quizzes," they were based on behavioral interviewing techniques. The purpose of behavioral interviews is to get an impression of how candidates approach and solve new problems, so the evaluator can try to predict their future performance in a working environment. Typically they are in the form of "Describe a time when you faced Problem(x), and how were you able to resolve it.
      For example getting an "A" in Analytical chemistry means you know the theory behind analytical techniques, but it doesn't give insight into how one solves issues. Running, maintaining, and working with partners to gather data from an FTIR tool, demonstrates a much broader and more applicable set of skills for the real world. With these experiences the candidate in an interview can discuss how they maintained long-term stability of a metrology, provided advice to others on the best way to prepare samples, and identified and troubleshot issues. Heck it can even reveal how they handle interpersonal issues, like if two research assistants are arguing about getting time on the machine.

      When interviewing somebody for a lab position, a funny example I used was giving them a ruler and asking them to measure the length of a line on a piece of paper. Most of those interviewed would take the ruler, measure the line really carefully (like it was a final exam, lol) and give me the answer. However, two candidates took the ruler, measured the length of the paper then made a few measurements of the line, before calculating the answer. You could tell they had some experience working with metrologies in the real world. They understood by measuring the side of a piece of paper (typical 8 1/2 x 11) they could get an indication of the ruler's accuracy, and with multiple measurements of the line they took into account statistical variation.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    128. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 1

      You know, I looked at current salaries and they're at about 70K for most higher level developers these days. Back in '99, those same developers were getting over 100K.

      You shouldn't really compare salaries to the DotCom bubble era. I lived with a couple of stoners who made $65k a year just to ensure web pages were working correctly. They didn't actually know how to fix the pages, they just clicked around and submitted a ticket if something was amiss.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    129. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Almost...here's the official version.

      We started asking it because so many people failed what we considered to be our softball, easy question. We thought that there's no way candidates could fail to be able to come up with a loop from 1 to 100 with some if-else conditions, but it would be a good way to break the ice and help them start to feel confident and less nervous.

      Man were we wrong. At least 1 in 4 candidates fails this. For a time, it was a very useful tool that kept us from having to spend multiple hours with candidates that were simply not qualified to write code anywhere, let alone at the level we wanted. But then HR complained to management that we were rejecting too many of their candidates and we were told that simply failing FizzBuzz wasn't enough to fail the interview.

      The most interesting thing is how candidates fail. By far the most common is not knowing how to tell if a number is divisible by 3, 5 or both. Many candidates have never seen the modulus operator and don't know about integer math. Without those two tools, figuring out whether a number is a multiple of another number can be hard. Other people don't know how to write a loop, so they end up writing 100 System.out.println calls and manually changing all the ones that shouldn't be numbers to the appropriate word. Some of those actually think they've gotten it right. And still others don't get the logic right to first check for divisibility by 3 and 5 before checking for them individually and so the program never prints FizzBuzz.

      And yet these people are getting jobs making more than $100k per year in the Bay Area.

    130. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 1

      For those big companies, bringing in somebody because they are a little less expensive doesn't make much sense. Most of their H1Bs are geared towards PhD's who can provide important skills they may be weak in, which is reflected by high salaries
      Apple, Intel, Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are all paying over $100k to H1B holders

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    131. Re:talent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well for the etl package, it didn't reach production. For the production issue, it's totally unrelated for one, for two, my client outsourced the management of these servers to IBM/Satyam. We don't have any rights to look what's going on there. Marvelous environment.

    132. Re:talent! by Alioth · · Score: 1

      It *is* already the law, it just needs enforcing.

      Having said that when I was on an L-1 and then an H1-B, I was *significantly* more expensive than a US worker. I'm also not from the Third World so living in the US itself wasn't a particular aim of mine, if I decided to quit I was perfectly happy with leaving the US (I didn't quit, but I no longer live in the US).
       

    133. Re:talent! by NewYork · · Score: 1

      Unlike in Capitalism, Globalization is zero-sum and demands you to be an "Highly Skilled Wage Slave" to get a job.

    134. Re:talent! by alexo · · Score: 1

      Why should they teach IRQ settings of Windows 98 in a CS program?

      Does a degree in biology imply that you can milk a cow?

    135. Re:talent! by servognome · · Score: 1

      I'd expect somebody in the computer field to tinker around with machines, and it's not like IRQs are windows 98 specific and are never used anymore.
      I might not expect a biologist to be able to milk a cow, but they should at least have an idea where the milk comes from.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  2. Congress is still debating the Barbary Pirates by gelfling · · Score: 1

    They should get to this issue sometime around the year 2347

  3. There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    > While U.S. tech workers scream that they're losing out on jobs as H-1B workers are hired

    No *competent* tech worker is screaming that. Seriously. If you are in tech and unemployed right now, it is nobody's fault but your own; everyone is hiring like a madman right now.

    1. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I used to want to get a job in IT, but all the entry level positions required 5 years or more of experience on top of the certifications, and that was just for jobs where they were having you read a support script.

      I'm sure once you're in it's a lot easier, but I don't recall seeing a single opening back then where I could apply, not a single one. Ultimately, I gave up and got work in a different sector where it wasn't quite as bad, but entry level does not mean 5 years of experience, it means at most 1 year.

    2. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I second this. It is very hard to find good people, local or otherwise. It seems that all the talented tech workers are not looking for work. The people whining that they can't get jobs are useless and lacking in self-awareness.

    3. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      At higher levels, they focus on "Purple Squirrels" -- hard to meet combinations that aren't available -- instead of people who can do the job well.

    4. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Talent has nothing to do with it. I can get dozens of jobs at any moment but not one that pays over 50K because a foreign worker will do the same job for 30K. I made 70K when I was 23 (2003) 75-80K when I was 25- 27 doing the same job with less experience.

    5. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translation: Waaa no one will work for pittance I'm offering!

    6. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      If the talented tech workers are not looking for work (at your company), perhaps you are not making them an offer they find interesting. Perhaps your company looks like it has a dubious business plan, and they see no reason to hitch their wagons to your ailing horse.

    7. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      One interesting thing I noticed with H1Bs from Ireland is that their education cost them 0 because that was paid for by their government. That alone seems like an unfair advantage, one that makes Congress seem a tad hypocritical to me.

    8. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here - 3-5 years in something specific, usually with several other requirements.

    9. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      Beggars can't be choosers. If there is indeed this mythical horde of talented tech workers out there looking for work, surely they would prefer any job to no job. So, where are they all?

    10. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talent has everything to do with it. Even with my limiting H1 visa, I'm making over $100k/year. Many other software developers I know with H1 visas also have similar salaries. I'm getting job offers every month, and most of them would be happy to hire citizens as that is easier for them. But that is for software developer market. Salaries for other jobs are decreasing, but not because of foreign workers or any similar reason. World needs less and less work due to increasing automation, and simple jobs are either disappering completely or getting their salaries reduced. You cannot fight with this trend. Only solutions are 1) unionize 2) accept the fact and live with it 3) try to improve yourself. Obviously these solutions have their own problems as well, so pick your poison.

    11. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by sam_paris · · Score: 0

      No offense intended, but if you have more than 5 years of experience and you can't get a tech job over 50k, then you're doing something very wrong. I have recruiters bombaring me for a variety of jobs 75k+ and I'm currently on 110k. I have less than 5 years experience.

      Maybe it's to do with your location? Move to NY or Cali, practice your interviewing technique, you'll find a job.

    12. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by sam_paris · · Score: 0

      Totally agree with you. I'm on a H1 visa too and earning 110k. How did I get this job? I spent three months working 10 hours days studying to improve my skills. Then I went to about 15 interviews which I used as practice to work on my weak points. After each interview I made notes about where I did well and where I failed and then I focused on those weak points. Then, when the interviews came up for the companies I cared about, I nailed them. Result, two offers to two of the best and most well known companies in the world.

      There are plenty of jobs out there for people with the talent and the guts to work hard and prove themselves. You can't sit at home twiddling your thumbs and think that just because you got a Comp Sci degree, that the world owes you a 50k+ tech job.

    13. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 1

      I'm not in tech. I was just commenting on the foreign worker issue.

    14. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by sam_paris · · Score: 1

      Ah ok :) Thanks for clarification!

    15. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      No, the problem is that the companies are insane. I moved for personal reasons and applied to an "entry level' help desk position for a company web site (incoming phone and email support). Required 5 years experience and a computer science degree. HR was a pain to deal with, so I turned down an interview because it would have been a waste of my time. The wording of "entry level" was to set pay expectations, and the job performance they wanted was T2 support for T1, or something like that. Any place that sets up for that initially rarely treats employees well.

    16. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      Beats me, but if someone is complaining about a lack of employees, simple economics suggests that they should offer more money. Bid salaries up, you'll get more people interested in working for you. We want the best people working where they'll produce the highest value, and they way we get there is through market mechanisms. That's the capitalist way -- not bribing politicians for special favors.

    17. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Which proves the point. There are sufficient talented people, just not sufficient people the companies wish to hire applying for the right job at the right time.

    18. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      At higher levels, they focus on "Purple Squirrels" -- hard to meet combinations that aren't available -- instead of people who can do the job well.

      Must speak and write fluent Hindi or Urdu. Must be able to score above 90% on a test on the Geography of India. Must have a social security or tax number that starts with a 9.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    19. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      Talent has nothing to do with it. I can get dozens of jobs at any moment but not one that pays over 50K because a foreign worker will do the same job for 30K. I made 70K when I was 23 (2003) 75-80K when I was 25- 27 doing the same job with less experience.

      Me too. I know I have talent because I literally went from making $40k in 1996 to $180k in 1998 because companies kept stealing me away from each other. I was 28 at the time. Now I make under $100k. Not too bad by average wage standards, but pretty pathetic for someone with 3 times the experience I had when I made $180k and who works 50% more hours than what I did back then.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    20. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Beggars can't be choosers. If there is indeed this mythical horde of talented tech workers out there looking for work, surely they would prefer any job to no job. So, where are they all?

      They gave up and took jobs as restaurant or retail managers or some other position that pays more.
      At my company, we have literally had two people quit to go into Ministry, and got paid more in the Ministry than they did at my company.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    21. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, you were likely some webby developer type. That was hot once, but not all that difficult. Most systems developers, for example, would rather put "Proficient in MS Word" on their resume than "Developed Web Apps". You likely hit a bubble where the market for people competent, and more importantly willing and interested in doing that sort of work was frothy and you incorrectly think that's 'normal'. Then, everyone started learning "web development" instead of getting a degree in Woman's Studies and were quite able to do the job so supply caught up with demand -- game over.

    22. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by uncqual · · Score: 1

      simple economics suggests that they should offer more money

      False. One can not mint truly skilled developers simply by paying them more - there's a pretty fixed inelastic supply legally able to work in the United States. There is, of course, a very elastic supply of incompetent developers -- but hiring one often, even at a salary of $0, costs more than leaving the position open.

      I've read many thousands of resumes, done many hundreds of phone screens, and conducted hundreds of interviews over the years for developer positions. I've hired a bunch of developers, some of whom didn't work out (it's usually pretty obvious within a week or two that a hire was a mistake). I can't clone a good developer, I take them from a fixed pool and that pool isn't going to get bigger in the United States until we fix our lax culture and fix our educational system.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    23. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I used to want to get a job in IT, but all the entry level positions required 5 years or more of experience on top of the certifications, and that was just for jobs where they were having you read a support script.

      I'm sure once you're in it's a lot easier, but I don't recall seeing a single opening back then where I could apply, not a single one. Ultimately, I gave up and got work in a different sector where it wasn't quite as bad, but entry level does not mean 5 years of experience, it means at most 1 year.

      Well if you do not have 5 years experience you are not competent. You are entry level and when I lowered my salary to $13.50/hr employers jumped all over me! I am going to work as a bartender and wait some tables too to make up for this :-(

      But, the days of making $35,000 with 0 experience are over. What makes you so special you feel entitled to all that HUGE amount of money? YOu need to prove yourself. The good news is after I accepted that I am getting more calls for jobs offering more. That is not the fault of H1B1 visas my friend.

      This is just reality pre 1999 for every single profession out there. Even lawyers start out as secretaries and assistants for the first 3-5 years making $30,000 a year before getting that $60,000 job. Making $200,000 a year needs a very thorough and proven track record and those are the ones you hear about on TV. Not Susan who just graduated and only knows theory and never even worked on a case before?!

    24. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      Do you have a reading problem? I was specifically talking about entry level positions. How exactly do you propose that I, or anybody else, get an entry level position when all of them require 3-5 years of experience? Certifications can be had fairly easily, but actual work experience relevant is a lot more difficult to come by when nobody is hiring people without work experience.

      Seriously, I'm curious about how you think that I'm self entitled when I make no assertions about salary demands. I would have been more than happy to settle for $13.50 an hour, but I couldn't even apply because the applications required a massive amount of experience compared with what the jobs really required.

      And yes, this is the fault of the H-1B visas, they can demand ridiculous amounts of education for the entry level jobs because they don't have to fill higher level positions, they can just avoid promoting people.

      On the other hand, I'm guessing that you're an incompetent jackass if you think that it's possible to prove oneself when nobody will hire you. I'm sure it's probably possible. I highly doubt that references from non-IT workers really count much and maintaining one server for a few hours a year probably isn't going to count much either.

    25. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Lower your salary and you will get hired. Yes it will pay shit and you will need a 2nd job for a year or two but that is what you need to do.

      The $13.50 or all outsourcers and temp agencies. Start there, volunteer, do some temp projects like Windows XP to Windows 7 migrations where you can learn and get a reference or two. It will take a few years.

      Most who ask for the world know for $13/hr they will not get all of it. Many will use that for 6 months to see how you do and them move you up to $18/hr afterwards. They can do so because they can and after you show them you are well worth that extra money and they are afraid you will quit on them.

      H1B1 outsourcing companies make more upfront. Yes their employers make shit but the company takes the other 40%!

      Call me a jackass all you want. The fact is I am the one with the job.

      I am not saying this to be insulting but I could not live with myself being someone who is a loser which is what I was when I turned down work. Temp agencies want someone who can do very basic things but you need to let them know ahead of time what you can do. Put them on your resume and get some contacts. Your bestbuy can even help at Geeksquad if you are desperate. Have you went to the local Computer Repair shops in your area? Have you talked to the owners and explain you just want to prove yourself and will be happy just to have a job? Did you pass the A+ exam?

      I did 100% of the above. I am also quiting the I.T. field and looking at teaching because I am worth mroe than $13/hr. Just perhaps to a different employer doing something else. In alaska (do not live there now) you can substitute teach and make $140 a day with a degree. There are jobs out there unless you are in Detroit. They suck and pay not that much. You need to fill in that gap on your resume Hedwards anyway possible.

      So a talk to a copier/computer repair shop guy is how to get in since HR will filter your resume out. After 1 year quit, After a 2nd year in a corp you will have the experience and now references to make a middle class salary. Or do something else?

    26. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by dr2chase · · Score: 1

      The pool's not at all fixed -- people can stay in grad school or get a job, undergrads can choose CS or something else. Managers with programming skills can return to hacking. People who are working on something that is "interesting" but not very lucrative might have their head turned by a higher salary. There's companies out there doing stupid stuff; hire their programmers away from them.

      Sounds like the problem at your end is that you need a better filter to sort good from bad.

    27. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by hedwards · · Score: 1

      The point I'm making is that $13 an hour is substantially less than what one needs to survive in any reasonable way around here, but I would have been more than happy to accept a position for that, but there were no jobs that were even being offered that required less than 3 years of experience. None at all, and it didn't matter what price one was asking to be paid, there just weren't any jobs being offered. And that was during the mid noughties when things were chugging along relatively fine. Security practically pays more than that around here.

      $13 an hour was still more than what I ended up making at other jobs I was able to get hired at during that period of time. So, there's clearly not something that's adding up, you may well be right that companies are publishing fraudulent employment advertisements, which is another serious issue that needs to be addressed.

      It's a crime that people can't just expect to be paid a living wage if they're willing to do the work.

    28. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. A co-worker of mine with degrees in math and science complained about this at lunch. He said, "I'm a college-educated middle class professional. I shouldn't be just scraping by!" And he's right.

      I tried to explain to a photographer friend of mine what it's like in IT, trying to meet hiring requirements. I said imagine you showed your portfolio to an employer:

      Employer: I see a lot of quality work here. You clearly are a capable photographer, and know your stuff. But we need someone who has taken photos of green things, and I don't see any green things in your pictures. Thanks for coming down, good day.
      Photographer: But I can take photos of green things!
      Employer: Sorry. We need someone who's done it already. Good day.

    29. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by uncqual · · Score: 1

      First, you WANT your manager to be someone who could return to "hacking" (a ridiculous term when dealing with Enterprise software where I have worked for 30 years) to remain a manager, you (and the shareholders whether they realize it or not) because you want them to be dealing with the corporate BS with a technical passion and using logic to set the PHBs back on their heels.

      Few, albeit some, who have the native twisted brain to do great development choose to pursue a degree in Linguistics or Ancient Greek Literature just because of pay (degrees in Linguistics and Ancient Greek Literature are not known for great salaries and upsides due to stock options).

      People who "stay in grad school" simply delay their enrtry into the developer pool by a few years AND, most of the time, are not really good developers (else, their passion for producing productive solutions would have overridden their fear of leaving academia).

      I filter good from bad aggressively - 95% of the resumes I see don't even get a response to the headhunter/applicant. 98% don't get more than an email saying "not a match". However, I demand direct access to the stream, as much as HR hates losing control, I don't want to lose a good developer who may not know C++ but understands concurrency having been the key developer on some proprietary system I've (nor HR) has ever heard of. Only a tiny percentage of developers "get" systems development - I understand it, Windows GUI APIs let fresh-outs think they "understand" concurrency and multi-threading -- they rarely do.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    30. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Top notch developers get $5k around here (Hungary) which is halved by tax, jfyi (you can buy a small flat for $60k just to give you a perspective). In the last 7 years I worked for three outsourced companies, one French, two American. No conclusion for you, just some context.

    31. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Orphis · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, this is the sad truth: life's unfair.

    32. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Apply anyway, get an interview and convince them. I haven't been "qualified" for half the jobs I've gotten.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    33. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Doesn't that suggest that your $180k salary was a non-sustainable, hype-driven bubble, more than it suggests your current sub-$100k is H1-B-deflated?

      I mean, we all knew tech salaries in the 90s were ridiculous: you could take a secretary, teach a couple of HTML tags, or show them the "save as HTML" button, and get $100k, Salary bubble, just the same as housing bubble: sucks if you buy in at the top; sucks if you base you plans around the top; very nice if you realize that, for 6-10 years you got paid 3-4 times your market value.

    34. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

      Talent has nothing to do with it - until a company is burned and a bunch of unmaintainable code with variable names like "foo" and Class names like public UtilityClassThatDoesEverything, which is full of memory leaks is crashing the servers every day or 2.

      Then they call in the people with real talent and pay decent salaries. Or they hire consultants and contractors to fix the mess.

      Talent does matter. It just takes some companies a little time to learn that doing things correctly with talented people often is a lot better strategyin the long run than hiring based on the lowest prevailing wage.

    35. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed... I just don't get all the fuzz about underpaid H1 workers. I'm on H1 too and I made $180k+ last year after bonuses, and it's just a run-of-the-mill software engineering job. I have a friend on H1 visa working at Facebook and I suspect he's making still a lot more than me.

    36. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      So, you were likely some webby developer type.

      Nope. Although I could and did do web development for fun, I actually started as a Unix administrator, then went to being a database administrator, and then a datawarehouse developer and database replication administrator in those two years.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    37. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Doesn't that suggest that your $180k salary was a non-sustainable, hype-driven bubble, more than it suggests your current sub-$100k is H1-B-deflated?

      Well, no, because I made $180k until the day that let me go after they felt I had trained the H1Bs replacing me sufficiently.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    38. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup... work smart and be well connected. The rules are basically the same everywhere, H1 or not. I don't know about other states, but everyone I know who's on H1 is paid at least $100k (ok, I'm in the Bay Area so my data point is skewed). Nobody in my circle can afford a Lamborghini yet but all the discussions about underpaid H1 workers seem totally divorced from reality to me. I mean.. if we're really underpaid, then everyone here must be driving a McLaren or Bugatti or something...

    39. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. While not unemployed (Hint: I'm one of the "competent"...), I've gotten the boot on consulting gigs because I'd sorted out the mess they'd made with H1B's and offshoring and they went right back to screwing themselves over with the same because they were "cheaper" than I was. The company is a major player and they've been hosing themselves off and on for a handful of years, chasing that almighty dollar when it'd been cheaper overall to have just hired one stateside dev, even as an "expensive" contractor.

      And hiring like a madman is a relative concept. Not everyone can WORK for what the jokers are offering- the statement stands...most employers are unwilling to pay what needs to be paid in order to stay "globally competitive" when in reality they just keep shooting themselves in the foot trying to race to the bottom and blowing through 2-4 times the money they thought they saved in most cases.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    40. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, it is... The problem lies in that you've got someone deliberately adding more unfairness on top of the already unfair existence that we all have.

      Basically, they're bending you over and using 50-grit for lube. Would you want someone doing that to you?

      If so, hello masochist. If not, you're being quite the hypocrite by saying what you just said.

    41. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the exception to the norm, sir.

      Most of the H1B's I've met didn't belong here because they were here for the cost concerns, not talent. They certainly weren't any better than the people I know that're underemployed doing whatever they can to find work.

    42. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      Heh... Sometimes, the company doesn't learn the lesson. They bring in expensive contractors to fix the mess made- and once fixed, they let the contractor go and go right back to the body shop places and hose themselves yet again.

      If you think getting cheaper labor is being globally competitive, you're just lying to yourselves and the world. In most cases, you end up burning 2-4 times what you'd have spent on the local workforce labor.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    43. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      Building websites for food trucks, not making as quite as much money but enjoying life and getting fee samples.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    44. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by xclr8r · · Score: 1

      edit: ..not making quite as much money but enjoying life and getting free samples.

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    45. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      "You likely hit a bubble where the market for people competent, and more importantly willing and interested in doing that sort of work was frothy and you incorrectly think that's 'normal'."

      Ah, so one would naturally expect that to be the case right now when employers simply "can't find anyone." Terribly curious how it isn't, no?

    46. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      " I take them from a fixed pool..."

      poor salaries decrease the size of the pool, as sister poster notes.

      moreover, who cares about the size of the pool. you don't have to 'mint' anything. offer more money and drink someone else's milkshake. if you can't figure that out, I have no idea why they hired you.

    47. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just contradicted yourself. If getting free labor COSTS you more than not hiring the labor, then you can't claim that this labor is ultra valuable to you, now can you, YOU STUPID CUNT?

    48. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > we have literally had two people quit to go into Ministry, and got paid more in the Ministry than they did at my company.

      Wow, I didn't realize that band was still around, let alone growing!

    49. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

      NO, Sparky, There IS NO talent shortage--there is just a shortage American born talent willing to work for Starbux wages. I've been to interviews where they were demanding certs in 4 modules of SAP, but only paying $60K. Dude. It costs in the neighborhood of $100K to GET 4 modules of SAP certs. Most companies pay a guy with 2 Certs on the order of $120K. 4 Certs the bidding in Cheapville is $180K. Yep, somebody with 4 certs in SAP makes approx what a MD General Practician makes in a rural market. Went to one place that was 100% H1-B's (until they FINALLY got busted--YAY!) they were paying $8/hr (yep, I said Eight Dollars per Hour) for C++ programmers. After work the herd of Indians, Pakistanis, and Filipinos would board the city buses and go to their second jobs at Wal-Mart, Subway, McDonalds, etc. Some of them made more at their FAST FOOD JOBS than they did working for the IT Shop!

      There is no shortage of qualified IT people--it's a shortage of IT people who don't have mortgages, car payments, and student loans to pay off so they are ABLE, WILLING, and HAPPY to work for under $20,000/yr with no benefits.

    50. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by uncqual · · Score: 1

      There are no "poor salaries" for competent developers. It's an extremely well paid profession - especially in tech centers such as the San Francisco Bay Area.

      I care about the size of the pool because that's an important factor in determining where the United States will rank in the world in technical innovation and other important ways fifty years from now. I'd like to fix the US education system and culture so we mint more competent STEM grads. Unfortunately, this is hard and would, optimistically, take at least two full generations to accomplish. As well, the effects of doing this would not be noticed for 20 years even if it were magically implemented overnight as the problems start very early in childhood and can't be recovered from in most cases once the die is cast.

      We do, of course, pay to hire the people we need -- it just turns out the pool of qualified candidates are about 95% foreign and started working in the US on a work visa of some sort (of course, many are now citizens or hold a Green Card). Imagine if not a single person who started working in the US on a work visa (including those who are now citizens) were in the US -- in that environment, very little software development COULD take place in the United States.

      As a country, if we can't make as many great milkshakes as we need, we should import great milkshakes from other countries. We are drinking India's and China's great milkshakes -- that's what the whole H-1B program is about and it's good national policy (although, it should be expanded).

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    51. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by uncqual · · Score: 1

      I was clearly referring to incompetent developers not being worth even a salary of $0. That sort of labor (which there is plenty of and which can quickly be created because anyone with an IQ over 90 can get a CS degree from somewhere and claim to be a "developer") has no (or negative) value to me. Skilled developers are valuable and that's what I try to hire (but, the vast majority of them are foreign).

      So, no contradiction.

      Hopefully you are not a developer because, obviously, you couldn't be in the "skilled" class since your reading comprehension problems would render you unable to even read a bug report accurately.

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    52. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by russotto · · Score: 1

      There are no "poor salaries" for competent developers. It's an extremely well paid profession - especially in tech centers such as the San Francisco Bay Area.

      There's lots of poor salaries for competent developers. If the recruiting and hiring processes at many firms were better than what they are, that might not be the case, but they are. The biggest difficulty for getting into the big tech firms is just getting them to notice you to get an interview in the first place; they get millions of resumes and applications and most of them probably go straight to the circular file based on keywords, without a human so much as reviewing them. Then they're filtered by tech recruiters, who probably aren't better than chance for distinguishing resumes of good people from bad ones.

      It just so happens -- and you can make this a conspiracy or not -- that some of those early filters favor foreign applicants. My personal favorite is the Masters degree requirement. It turns out that two of the best ways for getting your foot in the door in the US if you're a foreign national are getting a foreign masters degree (which gets you into higher-priority visa pools), or getting a student visa and then getting a US masters degree (which puts you on track for OPT, then an H-1B).

      So these foreign nationals have very strong incentives to get a masters degree. US nationals do not have that same strong incentive to get a masters degree, and there are good economic reasons not to. So if you require (or "prefer") a masters degree for your software development job, you'll see a talent pool heavily weight towards foreign nationals. This does not mean that the pool of actually qualified candidates is similarly weighted, it means that a masters degree is a proxy for something other than (or, charitably, in addition to) competence.

    53. Re:There IS a talent shortage. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >30k

      To be blunt about it: the people for that category of tech job are common as dirt; hardly surprising that many are unemployed. That is not the grade of tech talent that the big tech companies are having trouble finding.

  4. More like the cheap pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason for the discrepancy between what workers and employers are saying is a different definition of "Talent"...

  5. FTFY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    employers are countering that the low-cost, low-maintenance talent pool is lacking and they need to increase the cap

    Anonymous because I'm not a karma whore.

  6. Lets hire more! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We need higher unemployment of skilled workers because they cost too much to hire locally.

    I'm obviously bitter on this subject.

  7. Both opinions are true by tftp · · Score: 1

    While U.S. tech workers scream that they're losing out on jobs as H-1B workers are hired, employers are countering that the talent pool is lacking and they need to increase the cap.

    US tech workers have to compete with the tech elite of the world. It is then quite obvious that most of US workers are not competitive on their skills alone, not even counting salary and benefits and other expectations (like a somewhat limited work week.)

    The US employers at the same time are expecting to hire the best and brightest *of the world* - and I cannot fault them for trying. Naturally, those 85,000 are not all that is available on the world labor market; India and China are large places, and their people are not corrupted yet with ideas that everyone owes them a fine living.

    Add to the problem the duality of the salary. A salary that barely feeds a US worker is a windfall in the 3rd world. Work in the USA for up to 6 years, come back, open a business on all that money, and you are set for life. This is how Mexicans operate, for example.

    So both sides in this dispute are correct, in their own way. The US tech worker is forced to compete with the best of the best of the whole world, and he cannot win that competition unless he is aided by his own brilliance (it does happen!) or unique skills, or requirements of citizenship (for classified work.) In nearly every other case a foreign coder is a better match for the employer.

    1. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We aren't competing entirely with the best. We are competing with often less qualified individuals who are willing to be paid less.

    2. Re:Both opinions are true by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "In nearly every other case a foreign coder is a better match for the employer."

      In nearly every other case a foreign coder is a better match for the cheap ass that wants to give himself a bonus for having higher profit margins because he paid less wages.
      There fixed that for you.

    3. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Bullshit, what US employers want are an exploitable workforce that will work for cheap. This shit extends to other industries as well (mining in Canada, for example.) And these assholes that come from overseas are all-too-willing to go along with it too, fucking us all over in the process.

      And then there are assholes like YOU who fucking support these cocksuckers in their mission to enslave working people.

      Sincerely,
      Fuck your mother
      Die of cancer
      Rot in hell!
      (asshole)

    4. Re:Both opinions are true by Llian · · Score: 1

      Apparently they are qualified enough to do the job. There needs to be enough competition for the jobs, yet discourage obvious abuses. Setting a reasonable minimum wage would go a long way to fix that. But unfortunately, that idea is anathema in the US. Far too greedy on all sides of the line.

    5. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      US tech workers have to compete with the tech elite of the world.

      With the nice handicap of a higher cost of living.

      It is then quite obvious that most of US workers are not competitive on their skills alone, not even counting salary and benefits and other expectations (like a somewhat limited work week.)

      Is it? I see Indian companies setting up shop in the US and importing people with the primary goal of exporting knowledge and jobs from the country. It's the same bloodbath that manufacturing has seen engaged in by greedy executives as they export manufacturing jobs to China.

      India and China are large places, and their people are not corrupted yet with ideas that everyone owes them a fine living.

      Ah yes, because expecting to be paid a living wage in your nation of residence is an insidious ideal.

      A salary that barely feeds a US worker is a windfall in the 3rd world.

      Precisely why corporations like to offshore jobs. They get to take advantage of a wage gradient that individuals don't.

      The US tech worker is forced to compete with the best of the best of the whole world, and he cannot win that competition unless he is aided by his own brilliance (it does happen!) or unique skills, or requirements of citizenship (for classified work.)

      He cannot win. So long as India and China can keep the cost of labor down and increase their knowledge pool, much like US manufacturing, US tech jobs will be exported as well and US workers will have no recourse. Except, of course, to accept pay as low as received in India and China but without the lower cost of living. Which is what employers want. To keep income high and impoverish their workers - without realizing that they are shooting themselves in the head by destroying their market.

      Perhaps we should end the bullshit that is "free trade" and start some creeping tariffs. Exporting jobs should be met with a nice, stiff tax.

    6. Re:Both opinions are true by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      From experience, I can say there has been a big change from 2004 to 2012.

      In 2004, my company got masters degree candidates for bachelors degree salaries.

      In 2008, my company got bachelor degree candidates for bachelors degree salaries.

      In 2011, we were getting disengaged bachelor degree candidates. They basically counted on working for us for 6 months and then being rotated elsewhere. This had the expected and predictable effects.

      In 2012, they laid 90% of us off and replaced us with infosys people. They unexpectedly lost another 5%. Infosys was unable staff so we had the weird situation of not even training our replacements but recording training sessions. I went to lunch with a few of the survivors last week and it's a complete mess.

      Funny thing is- apparently these workers count as still being indian employees of infosys. They are working some fantastic hours, don't have the skill set and are trying hard to acquire it, but they are not getting paid U.S. salaries even they they are located in the U.S. - just good pay by Indian standards. Apparently they'll be rotated back to india and another similar crew will be brought in. I don't know- perhaps it's that 6 month thing overseas like we do with Aramco. I hear they are living 6+ to an apartment.

      So we are competing in our own country for jobs with people being paid in the $35000 to $50000 range when those jobs cost $100k locally and require degrees that are a lot more expensive to obtain here than in india.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    7. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Add to the problem the duality of the salary. A salary that barely feeds a US worker is a windfall in the 3rd world. Work in the USA for up to 6 years, come back, open a business on all that money, and you are set for life. This is how Mexicans operate, for example.

      I'd just like to point out that not all H-1B's are paid low wages. All counted I'll be getting ~160k to do software development in the U.S. on an H-1B, assuming all the government paperwork works out (you don't want to know the amount of crap there is to do). I'm pretty sure most Americans would be willing to work for significantly less than that, even in the bay area.

    8. Re:Both opinions are true by tftp · · Score: 1

      Thank you for expanding my terse term "better." This is exactly what it is. "More profit" == "better." There are no substitutes in the world of business. There is no even measure by which to compare substitutes if they were to become available.

      Note also that there is a chain of dependencies, up and down from where you stand. Say, out of pure goodness of your heart you hired a "less competent" person and he damaged an expensive machine. The manufacturer of the machine will not repair it at a discount just because the poor disadvantaged person who broke it deserves a discount. You will get no discount on anything; if you hired the guy and he fscked up, you pay for his errors. Same occurs upward: if the same guy had to take a few days off, unannounced, because he had an urgent drug problem to deal with, your customer will not be kind enough to waive the delivery date on the parts that the druggie failed to manufacture. You pay for that.

    9. Re:Both opinions are true by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      Add to the problem the duality of the salary. A salary that barely feeds a US worker is a windfall in the 3rd world. Work in the USA for up to 6 years, come back, open a business on all that money, and you are set for life. This is how Mexicans operate, for example.

      Why does a "US worker" need so much more than an H1-B immigrant? Do they eat more expensive food?

      How is it possible that an immigrant (who makes so much less than their US counterpart) can manage to survive in the USA with such a low salary AND have enough to help his family back home and eventually go back home to start a business? Whereas, as is claimed, if a US worker made that salary, he'd barely survive? It doesn't add up.

    10. Re:Both opinions are true by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      With the nice handicap of a higher cost of living.

      We're talking about H1-B immigrants, not offshore workers. Doesn't the H1-B guy LIVING IN THE USA have the same cost-of-living handicap? How can he survive with such a smaller salary than the US worker?

    11. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These "tech elite" you speak of have already figured out how to get around this self-deprecating American culture filled with barriers to entry and reams of red tape to create beachheads all of their own. This package is complete with offshore accounting and diplomatic immunity hiding behind every move that their respective companies make. They have the benefit packages and all the holidays they can ask for to go with an impressive salary and client portfolio. These companies do not hire Americans unless there is some inherent gain or loophole to be found. The "tech elite" want nothing to do with our jobs these H1-Bs are chiselers- straight up. But if you want to keep believing this outdated information go ahead and pay Tom Sawyer for that bright and shiny white picket fence.

    12. Re:Both opinions are true by crunchygranola · · Score: 1

      India and China are large places, and their people are not corrupted yet with ideas that everyone owes them a fine living.

      Right. How dare those American workers think that they deserve a reasonable share of the wealth they create! They have not yet learned, as the Chinese and Indian workers know, that they are techno-serfs who can expect to receive as little as the CEO finds he can pay.

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    13. Re:Both opinions are true by gstoddart · · Score: 2

      So we are competing in our own country for jobs with people being paid in the $35000 to $50000 range when those jobs cost $100k locally and require degrees that are a lot more expensive to obtain here than in india.

      Welcome to globalization ... the corporations and governments tell us it's inevitable and that it's good. Now it's a race to the bottom.

      The companies who want this aren't incapable of finding talent, they're unwilling to pay the salaries of Americans.

      They're inshoring the jobs basically and driving down domestic wages by making you compete with underpaid foreign workers.

      Since corporate profits will be at an all time high, so will executive bonuses and shareholder value.

      Somehow, that makes it even more awesome for the rest of us.

      ???

      Profit

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    14. Re:Both opinions are true by crunchygranola · · Score: 2

      ...Doesn't the H1-B guy LIVING IN THE USA have the same cost-of-living handicap? How can he survive with such a smaller salary than the US worker?

      By typically being a single individual not raising a family, saving for retirement in this country, nor paying off educational debts incurred in this country. Capische?

      --
      Second class citizen of the New Gilded Age
    15. Re:Both opinions are true by tftp · · Score: 2

      Doesn't the H1-B guy LIVING IN THE USA have the same cost-of-living handicap? How can he survive with such a smaller salary than the US worker?

      He has no peer pressure. He can live in a bad part of town; he can drive a junk car; he does not need to visit bars and strip clubs; he does not need to marry and raise children (with all expenses of that.) All he needs is a few years to park their $behind at, so that he can save as much as possible.

      Not every H1B does that, but I know those who do. It's not nice to live like that, as in barracks. However it's OK for a young man who just wants to work for three years, get his money and get out. All the nice houses and expensive wives can be had back at his home country, much cheaper.

    16. Re:Both opinions are true by Stiletto · · Score: 1

      So are US workers incapable of or unwilling to make those same choices?

    17. Re:Both opinions are true by tftp · · Score: 1

      How dare those American workers think that they deserve a reasonable share of the wealth they create!

      At this point in time the US worker is not even invited into the game. He is deemed to be too expensive and too fickle. Why to bother if there are millions of other who will work for less? Obamacare alone forces businesses to drop full time employees and switch them to part-time work, under 20 hours per week, or whatever it is.

      You can also understand the position of a business. If you make cheap stuff and sell it cheaply (or else you do not sell it at all!) then you have no money to spend on expensive employees. They aren't worth their feed, so to say. A US business is forced to compete with Chinese basement sweatshops who put together cheap stuff for peanuts. What happened to US assembly people? They are gone. You cannot compete with China on that. A US business can only survive if it is high-tech and has an edge. Solyndra didn't have the edge (no pun intended, but permitted :-)

      Note that I do not support the status quo. I only explain it. It is foolish to think that you can change the situation if you do not know what drives it. In this case the problem is driven by the simple fact that an employer can buy labor globally, but an employee cannot sell his labor on the same global market. If this is allowed to continue forever, we will end up with one rich guy on the whole planet, surrounded by millions of robots who cater to his every whim. Everyone else would have been destroyed long ago as useless waste. Dipple, here we come.

      The worst of all is that none of the "elected leaders," who ought to be spending sleepless nights thinking about this, play golf and laugh out loudly hearing about your troubles. Why do you insist on keeping those "civil servants" around and pay for their multi-million vacations all over the world?

    18. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently they are qualified enough to do the job.

      No, they are not. When the company I work for now (big name, offshore) took over the IT dept of the company I used to work for, they fired 90% of the IT staff and brought their own. Now, the remaining 10% have to deal with the workload, new staff`s incompetence, new management's feudal lords behavior, with the lies and the finger-pointing, with the obsessive impulse to randomly change stuff because "we know better, that's why your guys were fired" attitude, with total disregard for the actual problems etc.

    19. Re:Both opinions are true by tftp · · Score: 3, Informative

      So are US workers incapable of or unwilling to make those same choices?

      An excellent question indeed.

      Yes, the US workers are capable but unwilling to make those same choices, for several reasons.

      First, the H1B worker knows exactly what he is dealing with. Three years working as a slave, and then I'm RICH!1! back in India or wherever. I can live for three, or even six years like that if I know that this is a voluntary and temporary issue. I also know what I'm buying - I'm selling my comfort and buying future comfort in much larger quantity. If I don't want this anymore I can quit at any time, and the DHS will not forbid me to leave the USA.

      Second, H1B workers are required to work or to get out of the country. They cannot linger here and live on social assistance. But US citizens *are* eligible for all kinds of social assistance. At some point it is more profitable to collect welfare instead of working. I knew a guy around here who was on welfare. I found a temp job for him, with a good possibility of going full time. He refused! He said that social security money is more dependable.

      This means that the very existence of payments (food stamps, money, living, etc.) to able-bodied workers washes them out of the market of jobs that pay less than that entitlement. Actually, the value of the payments is higher than that. You get money for nothing - you don't have to expend your labor; this means that you get the payments + the cost of your labor as you price it internally. The employer has to beat that number!

      The employer is also burdened with minimum wages. This measure subverts the free market of labor. I am forbidden by law to sell my labor, whatever cheap it might be in terms of its value, for less than $7.25 per hour. Doesn't matter if I am suffering from some malady or the other and only can work at 20% of efficiency of a healthy worker. Who will hire me? But in a fair labor market I would be hired for the appropriate salary, and it would be fair to everyone involved. Same would happen to a secretary who works from home and answers five calls per day. Are you willing to pay her $1,160 per month for such a hard work? If no, would you pay her $100/mo? It's a good thing to have a human secretary who can deal with callers in a reasonable way, even if your company is very small.

      I'm sure there are more reasons to do what people do. I didn't even mention keeping up with the Joneses, but that is an important factor as well.

    20. Re:Both opinions are true by servognome · · Score: 1

      Have you looked at the data? 33% of those who earn engineering degrees in the US are foreign born. The highest racial group earning these degrees is white, followed strongly by temporary foreign residents. Even foreign born Africans, outpace minority American graduation rates in these fields. It's not a race issue, it's a cultural issue coupled with poor focus on engineering and science from K-12.
      In college when I looked around at my graduate research group, this information didn't really shock me. No wonder tech companies complain they need foreign visas to get the best candidates. A huge number of those who have the skills are foreigners learning at universities in the US.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    21. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Companies are in the business of making money. Not helping the economy, or helping you make more money.

      People seem to forget that. If you don't like capitalism, the proverbial door is always open for you to leave.

    22. Re:Both opinions are true by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > So are US workers incapable of or unwilling to make those same choices?

      Sooner or later you're going to want to grow up. At that point, the MIS equivalent of a job at McDonald's just isn't going to cut it anymore.

      No, an American employee can't/won't live like an illegal Mexican ditch digger.

      At the very least, the American needs to pay off his student loan debt.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    23. Re:Both opinions are true by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      The US worker probably has the expectation that he can live better than his relatives that still dig ditches. That's kind of a big part of the whole point of going to school for 4 years and building up a large amount of debt that has to be repaid.

      If I wanted to live like my poor cousins, I could have just skipped all of the extra work I've done to avoid that life.

      Thus conditions that are likely to decrease the local talent pool.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:Both opinions are true by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 2

      so let me get this straight: because the US companies learned they can hire for cheap and get 'affordable slaves', those of us who have lived here all our lives, paid into the tax base and have a STAKE in what this country is going to become, we're supposed to LOWER our living standard, now?

      as companies' profits soar to record highs, why in hell are the US workers supposed to take cut after cut and live closer to poverty?

      that's bullshit, man! we all know it. we know the game.

      'race to the bottom' is true.

      I just wait for when some whacko loses it and starts going postal toward his CEO. I wonder if they'll learn, then, what they have done to our middle class?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    25. Re:Both opinions are true by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      we (the workers) are not supposed to share the wealth.

      (didn't you get the memo?)

      ceo's should rightfully get that 400x salary. they're worth every penny.

      (sigh)

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    26. Re:Both opinions are true by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Well, I lived on half of what I made and was planning on retiring in January.

      Instead I got laid off on december 31st.

      So no months vacation pay but 3 months severence, a half bonus, and unemployment.

      I had enough to make it to 91. With the returns over the last three months (i.e. shareholder value), I have enough to make it to 96 as long as we don't get hyperinflation.

      Of course, if I had a job, I'd be screwed by hyperinflation too.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    27. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True. But many, if not most, are. There are tricks with the 'prevailing wage' accounting that allow employers to pay far, far less than the actual prevailing wage for that job. Tighten up the standards there, and lengthen the time a H-1B employee is allowed to seek another job if dismissed, and the problem would go away. Though, really, I'd suggest a minimum of 150% of the prevailing wage for a H-1B employee. If you don't actually _need_ a foreign worker, you should be hiring locally.

    28. Re:Both opinions are true by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Why does a "US worker" need so much more than an H1-B immigrant? Do they eat more expensive food?

      How is it possible that an immigrant (who makes so much less than their US counterpart) can manage to survive in the USA with such a low salary AND have enough to help his family back home and eventually go back home to start a business? Whereas, as is claimed, if a US worker made that salary, he'd barely survive? It doesn't add up.

      Oh, that's easy. You see, the American worker's family lives in America and so he has to pay American prices for goods and services. While an H1b worker's family lives in India, and sending home $1,000 a month is enough to let their family live in the manner of the top 1% in America. Also, the H1bs are willing to live with 6 people in a two bedroom apartment in the short run, knowing that they will go back to a huge house in India with the wages they earned here.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    29. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      33% of those who earn engineering degrees in the US are foreign born.

      That's meaningless. Many citizens are foreign born. Many of them came here as children. We're talking about H-1B guest workers.

      The highest racial group earning these degrees is white

      Irrelevant to this discussion. You may have noted that Americans are available in wide variety of colors, as are guest workers.

      Even foreign born Africans, outpace minority American graduation rates in these fields.

      Africans are amongst the most highly educated immigrant groups.

      It's not a race issue

      Agreed. So why do you keep talking about it? Almost nobody else on this board is.

      it's a cultural issue

      Ah yes, the old degenerate American culture issue. I suppose before the H-1B visa program (a whopping 20 years ago), when there was no shortage of STEM people, Americans were ruthlessly dedicated to the science and math studies. How quickly we've degenerated! And of course this enormous influx of guest workers, and all the outsourcing, do nothing to discourage Americans from studying for STEM fields.

    30. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshiat. We don't have to sink into depravity to live in capitalist society.

      Besides, the system is fundamentally flawed. Skew it enough, push us far enough, and we will burn the fuker down to spite them.

    31. Re:Both opinions are true by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      I work with Indians all the time and have for over a decade (been in the business for over 20 years). One thing I can say for sure is that their competency varies just as much as any American's does. Very, very few are real super-stars, which is the same case with Americans. So this argument that they're the best and brightest in the world is severely lacking.

      That aside, if you live in my neck of the woods and you can't find a job then you're doing something wrong. I could have another gig in 48 hrs if I quit right now. Many cities have hot markets and are hiring as much as they can. Others...not so much. Also, some cities seem to favor certain skills so it's important to tune your efforts accordingly (or be willing to make a move to another town). Another thing...if you can't build web apps, you're probably going to be looking for a job for a very long time. Good candidates can do everything from top to bottom and are up to speed on frameworks/libraries that are in favor.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    32. Re:Both opinions are true by servognome · · Score: 1

      That's meaningless. Many citizens are foreign born. Many of them came here as children. We're talking about H-1B guest workers.

      No we are talking about foreign students who study at US universities on temporary visas.
      In 2006, foreign students on temporary resident visas earned 32.0% of the doctorates in the sciences, and 58.6% of the doctorates in engineering.
      In 2006, permanent resident status students earned 4.2% of the doctorates in both the sciences and in engineering, a slight change from the 2005 levels of 3.8% in the sciences and 4.4% in engineering.


      The students on temporary visas are going to be the ones who will need H1Bs as they don't have permanent residence.

      Irrelevant to this discussion. You may have noted that Americans are available in wide variety of colors, as are guest workers.

      And foreign visitors coming to study also come in a variety of colors, yet as a whole they are performing disproportionately better than the rainbow of domestic students.

      Africans are amongst the most highly educated immigrant groups.

      My point is, to dismiss the myth the general population believes that foreign Asians and Indians are all the ones who are overrepresented in science and engineering. It's students from foreign countries regardless of race who are outpeforming domestic students.

      Ah yes, the old degenerate American culture issue. I suppose before the H-1B visa program (a whopping 20 years ago), when there was no shortage of STEM people, Americans were ruthlessly dedicated to the science and math studies. How quickly we've degenerated! And of course this enormous influx of guest workers, and all the outsourcing, do nothing to discourage Americans from studying for STEM fields.

      You don't see the issue when the US has a world class system for university education and research work, those resources are increasingly being used to train foreign students, who people think we should kick back to where they came from because they take jobs from Americans who couldn't be bothered to reach the same level of education.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    33. Re:Both opinions are true by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      10 to a house

    34. Re:Both opinions are true by servognome · · Score: 1

      That's meaningless. Many citizens are foreign born. Many of them came here as children. We're talking about H-1B guest workers.

      From the data:
      In 2006, foreign students on temporary resident visas earned 32.0% of the doctorates in the sciences, and 58.6% of the doctorates in engineering. In 2006, permanent resident status students earned 4.2% of the doctorates in both the sciences and in engineering,

      The majority of those getting high level degrees are the same one that need H1Bs to remain in the country.

      Africans are amongst the most highly educated immigrant groups.

      Like you say, there are people of all races domestically, and all races from foreign nations, yet foreign students group by group are performing better in domestic universities

      Agreed. So why do you keep talking about it? Almost nobody else on this board is.

      I included this because it disproves the popular racist myth (not so much on slashdot, but in the general US population that Asian and Indian visiting students are skewing the data by performing dispropportionately well in science and engineering.

      Ah yes, the old degenerate American culture issue. I suppose before the H-1B visa program (a whopping 20 years ago), when there was no shortage of STEM people, Americans were ruthlessly dedicated to the science and math studies. How quickly we've degenerated! And of course this enormous influx of guest workers, and all the outsourcing, do nothing to discourage Americans from studying for STEM fields.

      Technology is increasingly being integrated into daily human life. To keep up, there needs an increase in technical eduction. The US has world-class university learning and research facilities, which are ignored by domestic students and appreciated by foreign nationals. There is a tremendous waste of resources when rather making efforts to keep these highly intelligent and talented graduates in which we've invested huge resources into, people prefer to lock them out of the country to preserve jobs for domestic workers who weren't as motivated to gain the same level of knowledge and training.
      The system is prefers to keep the mediocre over the meritous.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    35. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine four guys living in a one bedroom apartment. Rice and beans three times a day. If you're talking about New Dehli, it looks pretty good, as long as the apartment isn't dirt-floor. If you're talking San Jose or San Mateo, it looks awful. This is exactly what people are talking about when they say "race to the bottom." By global standards, the US has a fantastic standard of living; globalization forces US workers, with US expectations, to compete against the poorest people in the world, and there just isn't that much difference in human talent. The only question is whether we can raise the rest of the world faster than we lower our own expectations.

    36. Re:Both opinions are true by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      You think companies using the government to distort the labour market and engaging in global price fixing is capitalism?

      Scrap the H1B program and give more foreign tech workers green cards and we will talk about capitalism. Indentured servitude does not make a free market.

      Stop government fixing currency rates for the express benefits of large corporations and to the detriment of smaller players and we will talk. Price fixing does not make a free market.

      Stop taxing labour at a far higher rate than corporate activity thus making the labour market favour the buyer and we will talk. Effective monopsony pricing does not make a free market.

      Capitalism my arse.

    37. Re:Both opinions are true by slackware+3.6 · · Score: 1

      Maybe the door is always open but it's not always possible to go back to school at 32 to train for a new job while supporting a wife and 3 kids mortgage and other payments. Just because a company lobbies the government to get some cheap foreign labour by claiming no one wants to work. In 2008 I made 75K in 2009 I made 36K and I was told I was lucky to have a job because Pedro would do the job for 30K. The thing is Pedro gets all kind of incentives and tax breaks from the government so he can work for 30K because he get free medical and dental and $300/ea in child tax benefit for his several kids.

    38. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is amazing to watch absolute believers in capitalism.. suddenly turn against it when it comes down to their own jobs.

      Where the fck were you when manufacturing went to China ? What about that cheap shit from china that lines walmart walls.. ? If those two were good for american public, H1Bs are too!

    39. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a bachelors americans can generally make more by entering the workforce sooner, than if they continued to get their masters (in my opinion).

    40. Re:Both opinions are true by MacDork · · Score: 1

      Immigrants don't have 5-6 figure student loan debt.

    41. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US standard of living was built on abundant natural resources, cheap energy, lots of room to expand, fertile farmland, etc. etc. Those "captains of industry" who capitalized on those resources found ways to exploit their employees, including lots of destitute European immigrants, for maximum profit. Then they rigged the game in their favor, so that cheap credit allowed the working poor to live like kings if they signed away their firstborn, while all the money got sucked to the top.

      Now, the working class has no disposable income to spend at the small businesses which used to be the "engine of the economy." The small players are struggling to stay afloat because they can't compete with economies of scale that huge importers/retailers (Wal*Mart etc.) have. We're stuck in a pit of massive debt, income disparity, tight capital, low interest rates discouraging saving, dwindling resources, shrinking water tables, no free land anywhere, and energy getting more scarce and expensive. I'd say the game is just about over.

    42. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a red herring. Of course they can, but it requires turning a blind eye to the fact that productivity gains have been HUGE in the last half century, and workers have not shared in that. GDP value has disproportionately gone to the top, and workers are expected to forgo the wealth they largely created, just because someone at the top of the heap has them under his thumb.

      As Barbara Ehrenreich put it in Nickel and Dimed, "When someone works for less pay than she can live on -- when, for example, she goes hungry so that you can eat more cheaply and conveniently -- then she has made a great sacrifice for you, she has made you a gift of some part of her abilities, her health, and her life. The 'working poor,' as they are approvingly termed, are in fact the major philanthropists of our society. They neglect their own children so that the children of others will be cared for; they live in substandard housing so that other homes will be shiny and perfect; they endure privation so that inflation will be low and stock prices high. To be a member of the working poor is to be an anonymous donor, a nameless benefactor, to everyone else.”

      Or, if you prefer George Carlin: "That's the way the ruling class operates in any society. They try to divide the rest of the people. They keep the lower and the middle classes fighting with each other so that they, the rich, can run off with all the fucking money! Fairly simple thing. Happens to work."

    43. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a bit hypocritical for you to call employers cheap. You're the greedy ass who wants to bar competition to ensure he gets paid more than he's actually worth on the global market.

      How you see it depends on where you stand. You'll have to come up with better arguements than 'I want more money' to convince the rest of us to support you.

    44. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Infosys and Tata workers are on L1 visas making 60% or so of the average.

    45. Re:Both opinions are true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If H-1B visas are supposed to be for highly skilled work, then minimum wage and welfare are completely irrelevant as competition since such people should be making much more than that.

    46. Re:Both opinions are true by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up... informative.

      It says "The Infosys and Tata workers are on L1 visas making 60% or so of the average."

      We did hear they were on L1 visas so that part of the statement is confirmed.

      And we budgeted them on projects at $60 vs $90 for locals so that parts confirmed too.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    47. Re:Both opinions are true by tftp · · Score: 1

      Highly skilled workers are not immune to layoffs. This is particularly so when H1Bs compete for the same number of high tech jobs with locals. When locals lose, what are they to do? Go to McD to flip burgers for H1Bs?

      Minimum wage applies to general competitiveness of the society, assuming open borders for labor and ideas. If nothing stops a business in the USA from hiring a worker from Kazakhstan, and nothing stops the same business from selling the product to Nigeria, what role the business's home country plays in all that? Especially if most of the home population are now jobless and on social assistance? They can't afford your products.

      Minimum wage would be effective only if the country's businesses are behind a firewall through which nothing goes through. Then the minimum wage would act as a fudge factor for all prices within the country, or as an inverted value of the local currency.

      When the borders are open, the minimum wage only forces businesses to buy their labor abroad, where it is cheaper. In high tech cases they import H1Bs; but as you say they earn enough to not be affected by the law. However there are plenty of simpler jobs that are done abroad through outsourcing - and that is a consequence of the wages laws. Illegal immigrants from Mexico are also taking advantage of this law because they are not a subject to it - they get paid the going price on the labor, regardless of what the law says.

  8. They're not who you think by 14erCleaner · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From NPR, a few days ago. Why is Congress supporting this (other than the obvious answer, campaign contributions)?

    If you scroll through the government's visa data, you notice something surprising. The biggest employer of foreign tech workers is not Microsoft â" not by a long shot. Nor is it Google, Facebook or any other name-brand tech company. The biggest users of H-1Bs are consulting companies, or as Ron Hira calls them, "offshore-outsourcing firms."

    For the past decade, he's been studying how consulting firms use temporary work visas to help American companies cut costs. He says they use the visas to supply cheaper workers here, but also to smooth the transfer of American jobs to information-technology centers overseas. "What these firms have done is exploit the loopholes in the H-1B program to bring in on-site workers to learn the jobs [of] the Americans to then ship it back offshore," he says. "And also to bring in on-site workers who are cheaper on the H-1B and undercut American workers right here."

    The biggest user of H-1B last year was Cognizant, a firm based in New Jersey. The company got 9,000 new visas. Following close behind were Infosys, Wipro and Tata â'â' all Indian firms.

    --
    Have you read my blog lately?
    1. Re: They're not who you think by hemp · · Score: 1

      Look up your H1-b visa co-workers and see what they make:

      http://salaryquest.com/

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
    2. Re:They're not who you think by lightknight · · Score: 1

      M*therf*cker. No wonder the NorthEast market has been dead this last year.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:They're not who you think by AK+Marc · · Score: 1, Troll

      Remove the H1B cap. Set the price of the H1B to the price of training one Citizen from H.S. to the job that didn't have anyone available. Take the income of the visas and establish scholarships. Isn't that more in the spirit of the H1B anyway?

    4. Re:They're not who you think by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      One problem: most Americans don't want to learn anything valuable for science and technology development, and expect to be paid like people who made major contributions to their areas of science and technology.

      Even foreigners with bad to mediocre education and ability look like a better choice for employers.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    5. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ron Hira as in Professor of Public Policy at RIT?

    6. Re:They're not who you think by tompaulco · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. These companies have exactly zero citizens employed at the consulting level, and yet they year after year clamor for more and more H1-bs to fill their ranks. I have been approached by these companies before, but as soon as they find out you are not on an H1b then you never hear from them again. They are the proof in the pudding that H1bs lower wages and that the only reason we need any H1bs is to keep the cost of labor down.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    7. Re:They're not who you think by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's easy to look good when you have no student loans to repay and are willing to work for half the market rate.

      Of course slave labor is going to look better to to an employer. That doesn't make it acceptable.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re: They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Often Tata and others have a project manager of business requirements person in the US who can "translate" tasks to offshore workers.

    9. Re:They're not who you think by ebusinessmedia1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the perspective of a friend who lives in Silicon Valley, what is especially upsetting to her about the requested increase in H-1B and other visas (whose blatant goal it is to import more "high-tech" workers) is the support it receives from high profile high-tech leaders like Bill Gates, John Chambers, Eric Schmidt, and other. Those men made billions off the backs of American high tech workers, and they are using deception and outright lies to support their cause to bring in more H-1B workers. This is a pure race to the bottom, for salary, and skill. There is *some* need for H-1B's, but it's a mere fraction of the current 85,000 cap. This is an agregious attempt to displace qualified American workers, period. Read on if you want accurate information about this outrage.

      Some of the information presented in the following links would shock most Americans, because American corporate leaders don't want us to know the truth, and they are paying off policy makers with contributions to keep the truth from us. The H-1B fiasco has cost Americans $10TRILLION dollars, since 1975 (fromProfessor Norm Matloff's study (UC Davis).. For anyone who wants to know the truth, read on.

      One of the most respected technology pundits in Silicon Valley: http://www.cringely.com/2012/10/23/what-americans-dont-know-about-h-1b-visas-could-hurt-us-all/

      Watch this attorney and his consultants teach corporations how to manipulate the law to replace qualified American workers: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCbFEgFajGU

      Here's more abuse of the L-1 Visa (H1-B's are only the tip of the iceberg http://economyincrisis.org/content/l-visa-programs-brimming-abuses

      Professor Norman Matloff's extremely well documented studies: http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/h1b.html

    10. Re: They're not who you think by ahabswhale · · Score: 2

      I don't know where they get there data from but it's complete bullshit. A software developer making over $800k? Yeah, sure. I make far more than most developers and I'm not even in the same league as that. All of the salaries listed looked like pipe-dreams to me. I think they took real salaries and multiplied by 5.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    11. Re:They're not who you think by Vicarius · · Score: 2

      Student loans and cost of living and cost of education have nothing to do with it. I got all of my several degrees in US universities. Paid out-of-state rates, since as a foreign student I could never qualify for in-state rate, no matter how long I lived here. In the end, I still got slave-labor pay rate just so that I could get my foot in the door.

    12. Re:They're not who you think by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they are unwilling to learn it when at the end, they find all the jobs taken (by foreigners with H1Bs is the perception) and $100,000 in debt. Why take that risk when the payoff is so low?

    13. Re:They're not who you think by AK+Marc · · Score: 2

      Paid out-of-state rates, since as a foreign student I could never qualify for in-state rate, no matter how long I lived here.

      The same insane rules apply to citizens. I know people that moved to a new state for a state uni, and they paid out-of-state rates the whole time, even after 6 years. It would take something like two full years off with no school to earn residency for tuition purposes before re-starting school. Even a year off working between an undergrad and graduate school, and your 6th year in-state would still be as a non-resident (for tuition purposes, 30 days in the state and you had to update your driver's license to your new resident address, or you are breaking state law, so the laws are a little broken). Also, you are *never* a resident, unless you are living in a place with the right and intention of living there indefinitely, so someone with a temporary student visa can *never* be a resident. That's true in most countries, not just the US. A foreign student with a green card could get resident rates, but one on a student visa wouldn't.

    14. Re:They're not who you think by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      In other words, no matter what we set the H1-B cap to it will fill up as fast as applications can be processed, because there's money to be made.

    15. Re: They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It actually costs a company more money to hire a foreign worker than a U.S. worker. You have over $2000 in USCIS filing fees. If a company doesn't do the work in-house it cost at least another $2000 in attorney fees. If the qualified U.S. workers were out there we would be hiring them. Another thing to bust your conspiracy theory, we must by law pay a foreign worker Prevailing Wage so they are being paid fairly (compared to people in the same role in the particular geographic region - down to the county). We by law have to pay PW to these workers, but we don't have to pay PW to U.S. workers. So tell me again, is it really cheaper? And a lot of these people end up applying for a green card. So they all are not coming here, learning and going home. They are paying taxes and contributing to the economy. I am a citizen, and am tired of people that don't know that facts whining about this.

    16. Re:They're not who you think by Kumiorava · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How do you want foreign people to come to work to US? Close the borders for the foreign workers? I had opportunity to work in US for 3 years (L-2 visa), I liked it and I never had any problems with the salary level. At the moment I'm working in Europe again and happy, but if I ever wanted to return to work in US how should I do that? I also worked in China and sad to say the Chinese government is more open towards foreign workers than the US government.

      I would hope that a real capitalistic economy would be able to handle also free market for employment. I would say that foreign workers also bring more to the table than just the low wage and inferior skills. Open the borders for foreign workers who pay their taxes to US and economy will benefit from that, having companies held hostage to some nation wide union of american workers is not a good thing in the long run.

    17. Re:They're not who you think by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Because risk should not matter if all alternatives to taking it are exactly the same as if you taken it and lost. In reality, it's not a risk at all.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    18. Re: They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's one software developer out there making 800k, notice that the site is order by wages high to low.
      The site says data is a from government disclosures, my guess would be LCAs (Labour Condition Applications, filed with H1B applications).
      These documents says what the minimum wage should be.

      I'm going through the H1B process this year, my LCA said minimum wage of 85k, however, my employment contract says 95k + bonuses...
      So I wouldn't say that LCAs are an overestimattion of what H1Bs are paid.

      By the way, if I don't get my H1B, I'll just work from home, or other location in the world... Applying for San Francisco what just sort of a spur of the moment :)

    19. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How come all your links seem to point to *opinionated* write-ups rather than objective reporting?

      I should've guessed it when you kept saying " Read on if you want accurate information about this outrage" and "For anyone who wants to know the truth, read on." Sounds like you're trying hard to sell some conspiracy theory pulled out of thin air.

    20. Re:They're not who you think by AK+Marc · · Score: 1
      I have a friend who failed out of college and made more in his first 5 years out of college than I did with a degree. If you consider the expense of college a "risk" and the increased pay the "payout" for the risk, then college isn't worth it in most cases. When the risk has a cost and isn't likely to pay off, it's not a "risk" anymore. It's a stupid expense. That's what it is now, a stupid expense, not a risk.

      Because risk should not matter if all alternatives to taking it are exactly the same as if you taken it and lost. In reality, it's not a risk at all.

      So college has a zero cost? Because if you take the risk and lose, you have a shitty job and $100,000 of debt. I think you need a refund on your "risk" it obviously didn't pay off.

    21. Re: They're not who you think by superwiz · · Score: 1

      We by law have to pay PW to these worker

      Obvious answer to that is that prevailing wage is a range and by being able to always pay at the bottom of that range to a large population of (even the most talented) foreign workers, you suppress the wage. But that's the least of it. Near slave-like working conditions in IT departments are there because people are forced to compete with the workers for whom firing is equivalent to deportation.

      --
      Any guest worker system is indistinguishable from indentured servitude.
    22. Re: They're not who you think by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Having done some hiring of H1B, I can confirm that this is the case. The company I am at now turned down an H1B friend of mine from my last company, because the sponsorship made him $5000 more than everyone else.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    23. Re:They're not who you think by XopherMV · · Score: 2

      ...having companies held hostage to some nation wide union of american workers is not a good thing in the long run.

      Good for who? The limits may be inconvenient for foreign workers. They may be inconvenient for international corporations. But, keeping American jobs in America is good for American workers. And yes, America makes more than enough highly skilled workers to fill all these jobs.

    24. Re:They're not who you think by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      This is why I have been saying America IS heading for a collapse that is now inevitable, the game has been tilted so damned badly to those at the top who as we saw from that article the other day funnel all their money offshore while getting checks from the government that there is NO way to stop the collapse now.

      Even though I frankly don't like libertarians and think they all come down to 2 camps, one who wants a government to whip the slaves and the other that would prefer to hire a goon squad to whip the slaves when you look at the actual figures without the bullshit number twisting provided by the libertarian at free domain radio its as plain as the nose on your face...the entire economy is a sham. Its all smoke and mirrors, its the broken window fallacy on a national scale, they are just printing massive amounts of money to "hire" more government workers to pad the numbers but there is NO recovery, in fact we are 13 million jobs behind what we were in 07...its ALL just bullshit.

      Of course this won't affect the ones at the top one bit, they'll have enough advance warning they'll just cash out and quietly slink away, they have already moved the jobs to places where they can just dump toxic waste and treat workers like disposable people and thanks to bribes won't even have to pretend to give a fuck, but as for the place once known as the USA? Its toast. My guess is either Naomi Wolf is right and we'll end up another "el presidente" style third world shitholes or the Russian that predicted the breakup of the USSR a decade before it happened will be right and the USA will break up like the USSR did but either way what we call America is just about over. You simply can't tilt things so fucking badly against the majority of the population before they just stop giving a fuck or following your rules, a person with nothing to live for also has nothing to lose, just look at how many long time dictators have fallen in the past few years from the people turning on them.

      The ONLY reason why the people aren't already rioting and looting is the government is paying them not to, its the classic "bread and circuses" with more and more getting stuck at the bottom on welfare but as long as they have food, shelter, and cheap entertainment they'll remain placid...that is gonna be ending soon. You can't just keep making magic money without anybody paying in, just ask Zimbabwe how well that works and that is what we have here, we've gone from 85% of healthy working age people having jobs in the 70s to now we are actually below when women started joining the workforce as far as percentages go, and that is with both men and women in the workforce. And don't even get me started on the massive pauouts to big pharma, I know multiple people stuck on disability NOT because they can't or won't work, but because drugs they could easily afford if they went across either border are so insanely priced here that they can't get their meds they have to have to function without being on disability. Hell one of my uncles takes a drug that cost $13k a year in Mexico, know what it costs the state (which means YOU) for the exact same drug? $123,000 a year!

      So I say grab everything you can because the free ride is gonna be running out, probably before 2020, and when it happens pretty much all of the west is gonna be so fucked it'll make the depression look like a mild slump. That one took up until 1954 just to claw back to where we were before it happened and that was with all of Europe having their factories turned to rubble. This time? If it took less than 75 years minimum I'd be amazed, shit is THAT fucked up.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    25. Re: They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you look at the highest salaries, it's clear that the maximum salaries are errors where the 00 for the cents got entered as part of the dollar amount, turning a 90k salary into 9 million dollars. Scroll forward a page or two and you'll get something much more reasonable.

    26. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The company got 9,000 new visas.

      Points (and I know these to be factual):

      - When interviewed by their potential American employer, the Indian hired is rarely the one that interviewed (told to me by an Indian),
      - 9,000 translates into about 20,000 because of the "rotation" that these workers do,
      - They do not pay Federal Income tax if they are in the U.S. for less than some # of days (don't remember exact # of days).

      The current (and past) political climates do not lend any solution as the U.S. decays into a service oriented workforce
      (Bush counted burger-flippers as manufacturing jobs (not to be pejorative against someone trying to earn an honest living));
      maids, burger-flippers, part-time labor with no benefits.

      I don't blame the Indians, it's their nature to game the system when they can. Somehow the Indians have marketed themselves
      as super-intelligent. I had one manager tell me that Indians, as a rule, are more intelligent than Americans -- he really believed that.

      What we don't hear about in the news is that there are many other out-sourcing firms that are not from India that are trying to
      gain a foothold in the U.S. Some from South America (Spanish speakers), but the Indian firms work very hard against them.
      I've seen one instance where an Indian firm misled a startup non-Indian firm in the same company with the purpose to make them fail,
      and it worked.

      He [Garfield] points out that H-1B workers are supposed to be paid "prevailing wages."

      Okay, here's how the payment system works:
      A company contracts with, e.g. Tata for a particular requirement. Lets say it would require three (U.S) people. But
      Tata doesn't really _reveal_ how many people they will "assign" to the job, but contracts with the company for three "workers."
      To throw together enough undocumented spaghetti code to hobble something together that sorta works, they might assign
      6 Indians. So even though the U.S. company is, say on paper, paying $180.00/hr. for three heads the stark reality is that it's only
      paying $30.00 per Indian. The U.S. company know this. BTW, an Indian making $20.00/hour ($40,000/year) is a rich Indian in
      the U.S. I've been told, by an Indian, that earning US$10-15 in India is a very high salary.

      A rare number want to stay in the U.S., but many tough it out living 3-4 in an apartment (paid for by the Indian firm that employed them);
      ever notice that they kind of leave the U.S. after they get married?

      Now, don't get me wrong. The H-1B'rs are exploited by their own mangers. This happens because they are paid enough to live
      in the U.S. and save a little, but are not paid enough to actually be able to establish themselves in the U.S. Obviously, this isn't
      100% of the case, and there are exceptions that make it appear that things are working nice and smooth. But, when the H-1B
      returns home, if they were smart, can almost retire based on 4-5 years of working in the U.S.

      Yes, the economic differences are that significant between the U.S. and India. The cost of living in India is less than 10% of
      the cost of living in the U.S. It's a significant difference and it's not possible for U.S. workers to economically compete with this system.

      CAPTCHA = inhale (yup, I should take a deep breath)

    27. Re:They're not who you think by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      I have a friend who failed out of college and made more in his first 5 years out of college than I did with a degree.

      That's meaningless. What is the average result of all people you know that failed out of college? Over more than five years?

      If you consider the expense of college a "risk" and the increased pay the "payout" for the risk, then college isn't worth it in most cases

      Expense is not risk. Risk is something unpredictable and undesirable -- in this case, a chance that you will not be able to support yourself after the college. This is not any more likely than if you won't go to college, even if you take into account all the loans and expenses. Even in the worst case scenario you will end up paying minimum for 25 years -- if you will be really unemployed, you won't be any worse than anyone else.

      So college has a zero cost? Because if you take the risk and lose, you have a shitty job and $100,000 of debt. I think you need a refund on your "risk" it obviously didn't pay off.

      Over your whole lifetime, it's pretty much impossible that college education won't pay for itself -- $100,000 over 50 years that you have on average left to live after graduation, is $2,000 per year. Even learning juggling would be sufficient to cover that.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    28. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would hope that a real capitalistic economy would be able to handle also free market for employment.

      It doesn't. It's been repeatedly demonstrated that people just don't have the ruthless disinterest required for free labor market, but will repeatedly call for external support for non-competitive people. In a free market, non-competitive companies fail and go bankrupt. In a free labor market, non-competitive people starve and die. Most people see that as terribly unethical and want all manner of social support programs/safety nets. Those support programs distort the market, often in complicated ways.

      Very interesting analysis of this process, going all the way back to 16th century Britain, I recommend Karl Polanyi's Great Transformation

    29. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you want foreign people to come to work to US? Close the borders for the foreign workers?

      You'd be surprised at how many Americans want exactly this. The US is getting a bit of an isolationist streak again...

    30. Re:They're not who you think by war4peace · · Score: 1

      It's easy to look good when you have no student loans to repay and are willing to work for half the market rate.

      No student loans to repay? That is USA's faulty higher education system making it harder for US citizens to compete in a world where globalization is thriving.
      Also "willing to work at half the market rate" (your point of view) equals "willing to work for 5-10 times more I would make in my own country doing the same thing" (my point of view). Your curse is my blessing.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    31. Re:They're not who you think by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 3, Interesting

      @Kumiorava,
      I went to the UK a few times as part of my job employed by a US company. I usually arrived via Gatwick. I had a US passport, but no Visa since I was working for a US company temporarily at their offices. I was "grilled" at the airport in Customs by a british custom/immigration agent for around 10 minutes. I even told her I had a house in the US and I wasn't going to be there more than 2 weeks. But I still had to answer all these questions and I was treated like I was trying to "sneak" in to the UK.

      I also went to the Philippines several times and went through some of the same mess and I had to get multiple Visa's to stay beyond 2 weeks each time, even though I was working for a US company based in the Philippines and had no intention of staying or taking jobs from local residents. I was in fact there to train staff.

      I went to India one week to conduct training working for a US based company. I had to get a letter of introduction from someone that worked as my office, a visa that cost a couple hundred dollars from the Indian Consulate, fill out a bunch of papers with my personal information, and then I got treated like crap and ordered around by security in the Bangalore airport a few times by security officers brandishing assault rifles. I was there to train consultants from India. If anything, I was helping to train the local staff, not taking any jobs from anyone, but I still had to jump through all these hoops for 1 week. Only 1 week.

      In my experience, I think the US is probably not as much as a hassle compared to other countries. I dispute what you are saying.

    32. Re:They're not who you think by ProfBooty · · Score: 1

      I've been to china a number of times, and customs and immigration as well as their version of the TSA are all wonderful. Same in Japan too.

      --
      Bring back the old version of slashdot.
    33. Re:They're not who you think by Kumiorava · · Score: 1

      Have you ever entered US as a foreigner? That sounds pretty standard procedure. Even when I was returning with valid visa to my home in San Diego I was asked questions and treated like I was trying to sneak in to the US. Not to mention the 1-2 hour lines in the immigration at Atlanta. The job of the immigration is to check the stories and documentation, if she honestly doubted your story then you wouldn't be let in.

      I cannot say anything about Philippines or India, but I know for a fact that UK immigration is closer to US one towards foreigners (non-EU), my wife got once denied visa because she only had 1 month of bank statements prepared instead of 3 months. Often the treatment in other countries is similar to the one the country's citizens receive at your own country, it's called reciprocity and since US is one of the bigger offenders in poor immigration experience around the world the countries treat US citizens poorly as well. So if you are treated badly while travelling around the world it is most likely because you are US citizen.

    34. Re:They're not who you think by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      "most Americans" never went to Engineering school in the first place. ever.

    35. Re:They're not who you think by Emperor+Shaddam+IV · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure about the reciprocity. In India, the Indian nationals were being treated as badly as I was. I mean, my god, why does a passport have to be checked 5 or 6 times when exiting India by every other armed guard? I have stood in immigration lines coming into the US and it was nothing like the process I saw in India. It seemed almost as difficult to get out of India as to get in.

      Likewise, in the Philippines guys from the UK, Europe and other countries that I knew had to go through the same BS as us Americans.

    36. Re:They're not who you think by wb8nbs · · Score: 1

      This is misleading. I worked at a Telecom company in Chicago that had many H1B people. They all worked through a Contractor, as did any local temporary workers. This is what NPR called a Consulting firm. Corporations do it that way because there is a huge paperwork burden with hiring temps.

    37. Re: They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WOW! $4K dollars. You know you could probably TRAIN an American to do whatever job it is for that kind of money. Then you would have someone who could actually communicate (in the same language at least) with the rest of the work force.

      I have worked with TOO many Indians who "speak" english. The cultural differences and phrases are too great and americans have a very hard time understanding them. So where are the savings if everything takes twice as long to accomplish?

      Prevailing Wages, that is nice term. Who stops by to make sure that the role you provided on the forms is what the H1-B is actually performing?

    38. Re:They're not who you think by russotto · · Score: 1

      Even though I frankly don't like libertarians and think they all come down to 2 camps, one who wants a government to whip the slaves and the other that would prefer to hire a goon squad to whip the slaves

      Hey, that first group ain't true Scotsmen. Or libertarians. Whip your own damn slaves or hire a goon squad, but when you have the government do it you're just a fascist and there's no use pretending otherwise.

      My guess is either Naomi Wolf is right and we'll end up another "el presidente" style third world shitholes or the Russian that predicted the breakup of the USSR a decade before it happened will be right and the USA will break up like the USSR did

      The second seems unlikely; we don't have obvious geographic fracture lines the way the USSR did. The closest you could come -- breaking the coasts off of the center -- isn't viable in any case.

      And don't even get me started on the massive pauouts to big pharma, I know multiple people stuck on disability NOT because they can't or won't work, but because drugs they could easily afford if they went across either border are so insanely priced here that they can't get their meds they have to have to function without being on disability. Hell one of my uncles takes a drug that cost $13k a year in Mexico, know what it costs the state (which means YOU) for the exact same drug? $123,000 a year!

      While I'm no fan of big pharma, not all that money is just going to pay for mansions in NJ and PA and helicopters to fly between them. Part of what is going on amounts to a subsidy of those other markets by the US. So when the shit hits the fan, they'll go down with us.

    39. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      its absolutely baseless to claim that outsourcing firms bring cheaper workers on H1-B visa to work in US. For one, we must note that when an employer files H1-B petition for a potential employee, the employer promises (under liability to prosecution in non compliance) to pay more than the amount recommended BY LAW. So please if you have a problem with companies bringing in cheap labour, you will be surprised to know that companies have NOT violated the LAW. These LAWS are made by lawmakers who are chosen by American citizens. So companies are just following what American citizens want us to follow.

    40. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Runaway interest rate puts the kabosh on that idea.

    41. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see where you read that ebusinessmedia1 wants to close the borders. He's referring to the widespread abuse. That needs to stop.

    42. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have always thought Indians and Chinese should work to raise their own country's economy and stay out of ours. The US is a Christian nation.

    43. Re: They're not who you think by Tamerlin · · Score: 1

      A capitalist economy will ALWAYS culminate in a race to the bottom. That race won't end until somebody wins, and when somebody wins everyone loses. With capitalism unchecked there is no victory, and demise is only a matter of time.

    44. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your argument is counter productive because low (foreign) wages bring in less tax dollars than do U.S. citizen wages. You may like messing up opportunities for U.S. citizens and that's probably why you are not welcome here.

    45. Re:They're not who you think by NewYork · · Score: 1

      America should be really worried about the creeping caste system in US due to H1Bs from India.
      http://india.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/07/12/at-a-sperm-bank-in-bihar-Caste-divisions-start-before-birth/

    46. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Capitalist economy' is an easy out. If you were told your local town had given a million dollars in tax credits (at your expense because you pay those taxes) in the hopes that it would bring in more jobs to your city and 10 million in wages over time, you'd go "Hooray!" We all do that. We'd love to see our local economies grow.

      But here's where these H1-B visas and 'free-market' things don't match. Most of these visa holders are probably sending money back home, and not going into your local economy. Plus, they get trained in America, and then take those skills back to their own 'local economy' and take that much out of your local economy. All of a sudden this 'free-market' goes "Hey, it doesn't matter that your town has made this revenue possible, the money is going to go wherever. Freedom." But remember, you paid for this!

      You can't have it both ways. A government that provides services and protections to you, but also doesn't interject itself into the economy. Either the government controls aspects of the economy to protect you and finance its services, or the government is just your libertarian idea of contract enforcer.

    47. Re:They're not who you think by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately immigration is usually done in a fairly childish "tit for tat" method: Indians have to go through a severe ballache just to visit the US on vacation, let alone on business, so in retaliation the Indian government does the same to US citizens who wish to visit India.

      Even in countries where you don't need a visa for short visits, you can easily get a grilling. I'm British and most of the time entering the US is just a formality. But even so, one time a very surly immigration officer grilled me and was threatening to deport me for a paperwork triviality (and it was the immigration officer who made the mistake). Most the time, entering as a non-US citizen means an incredibly long wait at immigration - US citizens are processed within a couple of minutes but you can be there over an hour as a foreigner. I've "whitelisted" airports where this doesn't happen (ORD despite being busy seems very efficient, and at Houston Intercontinental the immigration staff not only are efficient, they actually seem genuinely welcoming. Dallas on the other hand was a nightmare last time I went through there. I won't even go through DFW on a domestic flight it's so chaotic).

      I've also worked on a visa in the US. Getting a visa is a Kafkaesque experience. One time I had a visa approved whilst in the USA without any problems, but the US Embassy in London refused to issue it when I was on a trip home because one of the forms was out of date. I got the new form from their website - it was 100% identical to the old one except the date at the bottom. If you have to go to the embassy for an interview, that's an interesting system, too. You go in this large square room, queue up for a delicatessen ticket, and they call numbers out. You can't really bring a book because they call the numbers out in more or less a random order, and from the experiences with the embassy you already know full well if you miss your number they won't call it again and then will send you home and you'll have to do it all again. They put "newspapers" out for you to read though, these are called "Going USA" or something like that. The first half is dedicated to how British people have emigrated to the US (and for some reason end up running gas stations in Florida), how wonderful the USA is and how terrible the UK is in comparison. The second half of this "newspaper" is dedicated to how we're not going to give you a visa anyway.

      When I had to go there for an interview they had precisely one question. "How long have you worked for IBM?" I told him, and he stamped some paperwork, and told me my passport would be sent to me within a few days. They could have asked that over the phone instead of dragging me all the way to London, waiting in the embassy for 4 or 5 hours, then going back home.

      Unfortunately, immigration seems to attract the worst type of people most of the time. This is not unique to any particular country. My Albanian next door neighbour was treated utterly disgracefully by the UK authorities.

    48. Re:They're not who you think by w_dragon · · Score: 1

      As with most countries, the US is easy if you know what to tell customs. For the US, you're attending a business meeting. If you're visiting a client or selling a service you'll be grilled, need tons of documentation, and spend hours at the border. Visiting India? Know who to bribe and how much they'll expect. Every country has an answer that will make your life easier.

    49. Re:They're not who you think by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Over your whole lifetime, it's pretty much impossible that college education won't pay for itself

      You can no longer discharge student loans with bankruptcy, and you are failing to compare non-college jobs to college jobs, you are compareing college jobs to unemployment. Spending $100,000 to learn juggling will never pay itself back. You can get a higher-paying non-juggling job that any juggling "job" in existence (I say job, because the only people who make significant money juggling do it as a self-employed employer and have no "job" but a string of gigs, and there are rarely more than 5 of those at a time, making your chance of payout on a juggling degree about the same as winning the lottery, and none of the jugglers worry about whether you have a degree, so spending $0 for 4 years to learn juggling yourself will pay off much much better than going to Princeton or some other clown college to learn juggling. It's impossible for college to pay for itself, even if you live to $1000.

      Even in the worst case scenario you will end up paying minimum for 25 years -- if you will be really unemployed, you won't be any worse than anyone else.

      You'll be just like the other juy sleeping next to you in the gutter, but with a government order that if the economy every improves and you find a job, someone will take $100,000 from you - but not the guy next to you who didn't go to college to be homeless. You can't discharge your debt, even if you are unable to pay for it. You would be more correct if they hadn't changed bankruptcy law to prevent discarge of student loans through bankruptcy.

    50. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work for Tata Consultancy Service (TCS) and work at M$ on a TCS contract. There are MANY of those types of contract here with various "vendors", TCS just being one of them. And yep, almost everyone I work with is Indian. Some of us here are white American citizens that were hired on by TCS America since they probably could get more visas otherwise us American's with TCS probably wouldn't have a job.

      Personally, I'd rather none of them be here and all of these American based jobs be staffed by Americans. We should always take care of our own first.
      Maybe we need a new "take care of our own" law. :)

    51. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, aren't you? I'm from the UK, have travelled in and out of the US on business for the last 25 years. Immigration can be a real nightmare, doesn't matter if you've got a business visa or whatever, you're still treated like a criminal every other time. Last time I was in the US was a vacation in Las Vegas six months ago - and I *still* got asked about trips I'd made on a business visa 20 years ago...

    52. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, immigration seems to attract the worst type of people most of the time. This is not unique to any particular country.

      YES!!!

    53. Re:They're not who you think by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Let 'em hire the goon squads then and we'll see how long they can hang onto what they got. The vast majority of the history of this planet has been "the strong and smart survive, the rest are cannon fodder" and i have a feeling a lot of those fat Wall Street libertarian wannabes are gonna be the second. This is why myself personally isn't worried about it, I can pick up pretty much anything quickly and they will always need somebody who can make the stuff work. I have a feeling when the collapse hits and all the stores that told people "just throw it away" are gone we fixit guys are gonna be VERY much in demand.

      and I wouldn't write off the Russian's suggestion so quickly, he wasn't talking about the country splitting on geographic grounds but on ideology, The map he drew had the east and west coasts separate but working together, the breadbasket as one group trading with Canada, and the red states as one group trading with Mexico. Personally if it all does hit the fan I wonder what will happen to the minorities, lets face it friend America has a looong history of racism that is still here, look at white flight or how segregated the east coast is. If the fed is wiped out? I have a feeling a lot of the old hates is gonna bubble back up.

      And I'm sorry but I gotta call bullshit on big pharma, looking up the drugs that some of my relatives are on NOT ONE was being sold at a loss or even profit free to mexico or Canada, on the contrary most were being sold with a healthy 10-15% profit. Nope what is happening is they have figured out they can charge 1000%+ profits here through bribes so that is what they are doing. That $123,000 drug my uncle is trapped on disability because of? Found by NYU with tax dollars and the sold to big pharma. So not only are you getting gouged you are paying for the research. In fact look up the figures friend, the biggest expense big pharma has BY FAR? Advertising. That's right, not R&D, not testing, but ads. I'm sorry but don't shed a tear for big pharma.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    54. Re:They're not who you think by servognome · · Score: 1

      I also went to the Philippines several times and went through some of the same mess and I had to get multiple Visa's to stay beyond 2 weeks each time, even though I was working for a US company based in the Philippines and had no intention of staying or taking jobs from local residents. I was in fact there to train staff.

      Customs laws are hard to navigate. There's usually exceptions when you tell customs you're there for a brief business meeting. But, If you intend to do any actual work (not sure if training classes are included) , it's way more difficult to get permission.
      I went to Malaysia to help resolve some manufacturing problems at the request of the factory there, no plans on staying, just needed to run some experiments and resolve the problem. Unfortunately, I had to sit in a cubicle for 2 weeks doing nothing while my work visa was approved, otherwise my company and I would be accused of using an illegal foreign worker. Once I got the visa then I could go out to the production line and start figuring out what the heck was going on, and it only took about a week.
      Similar thing happened in Japan, I was allowed to sit in a meeting room for a few days to do data analysis and provide suggestions, but had to wait for a work visa to approach the production tool. Before getting a visa I was only allowed to machine through a window.

      It also depends on the size of the company you work for. The government is usually more forgiving to employees of huge multinationals, than obscure small businesses.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    55. Re:They're not who you think by servognome · · Score: 1

      China is pretty easy going via airport, not if you are making the cross driving from Hong Kong into the mainland. Horrible traffic jams, and rude service.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    56. Re:They're not who you think by stymy · · Score: 1

      But you do keep the jobs in America. And they'll pay taxes, just like anyone else. Keep in mind, this is about visas, not outsourcing or offshoring. The problem is that companies essentially lie when they state that they can't find people in the US that meet the qualifications, but that's a different matter. It's generally a good idea to get well-educated, capable immigrants.

    57. Re: They're not who you think by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      Another thing to bust your conspiracy theory, we must by law pay a foreign worker Prevailing Wage so they are being paid fairly (compared to people in the same role in the particular geographic region - down to the county)

      I am sure some H1B employers do abide by the law. But, in the entire history of the H1B program, there has never been a single dollar allocated to enforcement of that part of the law. Nobody checks. Ever.

      To the best of my knowledge, there has been only one case of an employer being prosecuted for paying H1Bs below the prevailing wage - and that was reported by a displaced employee and the situation was so egregious that the case was basically a slam dunk.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    58. Re:They're not who you think by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      You'll be just like the other juy sleeping next to you in the gutter, but with a government order that if the economy every improves and you find a job, someone will take $100,000 from you - but not the guy next to you who didn't go to college to be homeless.

      You still won't have to pay more than given fraction of disposable income, and not for more than 25 years. This is better than being able to discharge the loan in bankruptcy.

      You would be more correct if they hadn't changed bankruptcy law to prevent discarge of student loans through bankruptcy.

      Then most students would declare bankruptcy at the time of graduation for shits and giggles, because they don't have any income, and won't need loans for quite a while yet.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    59. Re:They're not who you think by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then most students would declare bankruptcy at the time of graduation for shits and giggles, because they don't have any income, and won't need loans for quite a while yet.

      When it was legal, they didn't. Reality proved you wrong on every point you've ever made. I'd say "try again" but it doesn't matter, I won't be reading any further irrational and factually incorrect posts about your wrong opinions on this matter.

    60. Re:They're not who you think by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      When it was legal, they didn't.

      When it was legal, the loans were worse, tuition was cheaper, and scholarships more available. There was no point doing it. Now, that the government taken student loans under control, loans are more available and on better terms, so it also more tempting to abuse them.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    61. Re:They're not who you think by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Yes, and if you re-read my comment, you will discover that I have already mentioned that.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    62. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yes, America makes more than enough highly skilled workers to fill all these jobs.

      How do you know? Your statement goes beyond just saying that many jobs currently filled by people on H-1B's could as well have been done by Americans. You are actually going all the way and saying that currently there is not a single job in the US that lacks qualified American applicants. That seems unlikely.

    63. Re:They're not who you think by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      H1-B's are not about importing tech workers. They're about both creating a class of workers who are dependent on their employer's good will to stay in the country and about making it easier to ship jobs overseas.

      I would be much happier if it became easier for people with certain skills to become full citizens. Then they have a stake in our country and our economy.

    64. Re:They're not who you think by sjames · · Score: 1

      They don't want to learn it because they'll then end up digging ditches while corporations offshore and bring in H1-Bs. They want big pay because they have big student loans to pay off.

      Replace the H1-B program with a scholarship program and both issues go away.

    65. Re:They're not who you think by sjames · · Score: 1

      How about a green card?

      The first priority of an economy is to serve that economy's society. If we're going to continue to require working a job to have a living in the U.S. we must also make sure there are jobs to be had for the people here and that they actually pay enough to have a living.

    66. Re: They're not who you think by sjames · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should take that $2000 in filing fees and that $2000 in attorney fees and add it to your salary oiffer, then you can attract more qualified U.S. workers.

      I'll bet if I offer $15/hour for a lawyer, I'll find that there "just aren't any qualified lawyers to be found in the U.S.".

    67. Re:They're not who you think by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      "The biggest user of H-1B last year was Cognizant, a firm based in New Jersey. The company got 9,000 new visas. Following close behind were Infosys, Wipro and Tata -- all Indian firms."
      ...

      Cognizant is owned jointly by Dun & Bradstreet (76%) and Satyam Computers (24%).

      But Matloff is correct that wholly US firms abuse H-1B visas as well -- directly and by contracting with the cross-border bodyshoppers.

    68. Re:They're not who you think by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      "How do you want foreign people to come to work to US?"
      ...

      1. Pay for and pass a proper background investigation (this should be the same for any kind of visa).

      2. Provide some significant evidence that you're several standard deviations above the mean in intelligence, knowledge, and creativity. If you want an O visa that better be at least 5 standard deviations above the mean. We can afford to be picky; with 7G people in the world, that makes 700M in the top 1 percentile and that would be far far far too many, 350M in the top 0.5% and that would be far far too many, 35M in the top 0.05% and that would be far too many, 3.5M in the top 0.005% and that would still be far too many.

      Unfortunately, H-1B and L and J visas have essentially no intelligence, or skill, or knowledge, or experience standards at all. And F visas now have only token standards; you only have to be good enough to get into Sopchoppy-Massapequa Unified junior college. And the 1 year employment standard for L visas is easily gamed.

    69. Re:They're not who you think by NickGnome · · Score: 1
      "Even though I frankly don't like libertarians and think they all come down to 2 camps, one who wants a government to whip the slaves and the other that would prefer to hire a goon squad to whip the slaves"
      ...

      Libertarians are people who oppose the initiation of force and fraud. They don't want anyone treated as slaves. Even when it comes to criminals -- i.e. those who have been convicted of initiating force or fraud -- libertarians are split as to whether there should be any penalties, but all agree the violator should pay restitution to his victims.

    70. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but by supporting total market deregulation and "separation of business and state," they are tacitly approving the historical excesses of capitalism that allow the rich and powerful to exploit the working poor as wage slaves. Remember the "Robber Barons" were on the right side of the law.

      You think money and jobs can't be used as a cudgel to control "free" people? Think again.

    71. Re:They're not who you think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's easy to look good when you have no student loans to repay and are willing to work for half the market rate.

      If there are people willing to work at half the market rate, then the market rate is artificially high.

  9. It's not about the program by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We all know this is just a knoll in the economic winds. The worst of it being that the US can't clean its own house in the simple-headed ways that would make things like this happening an almost non-issue to the majority of practically-minded people. It's just that simple.

  10. To be expected. by arthurpaliden · · Score: 0

    "employers are countering that the talent pool is lacking"

    Well what do they expect when the standard US science text book is becoming the Bible.

  11. H!B is About Off-Shoring by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The 10 largest users of H1B are off-shoring contract-houses. Last year, those 10 off-shoring companies claimed 40,000 of the 85,000 available H1B visas.

    The way it works is that they low-bid on some project, bring in their people on H1B get them trained up and then send them back home to work on the same project.

    Citation: Who's Hiring H-1B Visa Workers? It's Not Who You Might Think

    All the PR about H1B says that we have a skills-shortage here, but if that is true, then H1B is contributing to the skills shortage rather than fixing it. Most of what is wrong with H1B could be fixed if the politicians actions matched their rhetoric - instead of being an unofficial dual-purpose immigration visa that typically expires just months before the immigrant clears all the paperwork for an green-card, make it a fast-track immigrant only visa - everybody on an H1B is guaranteed a green-card within just one year of residency. That way instead of being a brain-drain out of the US, we would be sucking in the (supposedly) higher-qualified foreign candidates to become permanent contributing members of US society.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    1. Re:H!B is About Off-Shoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The real problem is that the H-1B system doesn't really effectively distinguish someone importing a fruit seller to sell fruits and someone importing a genius to do something only that genius can do. As per this story, a genius applying tomorrow will have been blocked by the fruit seller who got an H-1B visa today. So in that sense it really is true that there are too few H-1B's available for geniuses - but that's just because they're getting used up by people who aren't.

      A good start on changing that situation would be to impose a minimum salary of, say, the 75'th percentile of pay for American workers with 5 years of experience in the same profession and area. And make it at least 70k. That way it simply doesn't make sense to hire on a H-1B unless you are hiring someone of excellent ability, which is supposedly what the whole thing is about anyway. If companies are willing to pay that amount of money, then their pleas of being unable to find a qualified American for the job start to sound more plausible. Making a green card an easy step makes sense too once you get to that point.

    2. Re:H!B is About Off-Shoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they bring off-shore workers over for training they usually have a different visa type. And as for the idea of keeping them here - why must they stay? The run of the mill H1b visa holder is NOT higher qualified in reality, their 'qualifications' exist on paper only.

    3. Re:H!B is About Off-Shoring by servognome · · Score: 1

      Or create a specialty class where if you have a graduate or other highly intensive degree then you can get into the country. Especially if the people earned their degree at universities in the US. We spend resources to train the best in the world no matter where they are from, and then kick them out because they aren't from here.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  12. Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Jobs report today said no jobs being created.
    Yet we are hiring many h1b's.
    Meanwhile, many of our 30 year olds are suicidal over a combination of unforgivable debt and no jobs.

    Quite a disconnect.

    I think it's time to put a tariff on offshored/outsourced jobs- including h1b's.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Jobs report today said no jobs being created.

      If you call 88,000 jobs "no jobs" the sure. By this metric, in other news there were no H1B visas granted this year.

    2. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      It takes over 200k jobs a month to keep parity (i.e., that's how many people are entering the workplace every month). Meaning, unemployment is increasing if you go below that. The reason the percent unemployed went down is that more people stopped even looking for work.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    3. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that the H-1Bs aren't necessarily being given in the same industries that aren't hiring. For example, construction is weak now and never was a big H-1B participant. There are any number of construction workers, English majors, etc. who are not qualified to work in IT, which is a big H-1B participant.

      One of the biggest problems with student loans is that they have no connection to jobs. People go through college expecting jobs to be there for any college graduate but many majors don't significantly improve one's job prospects. Fewer English majors and more engineering majors would be better.

      Example anecdote: a son of a union electrician goes to college and majors in psychology. He looks around and finds that psychology majors don't actually make much money. His dad gets him into the union. In his first year, he makes a little less than he would have in a psychology job. By the time he's a journeyman, he's making more than twice as much as a psychology major with equivalent experience. The problem now is that construction jobs like that aren't hiring. It's also worth noting that his college degree was meaningless. Others were getting the same job with no college.

      A better student loan system would operate through companies. Companies would put up the money for people to go to school and then give jobs on completion. If the company doesn't make a job offer, the company loses its money. If the student jumps to a different company, that company has to reimburse the first company for the schooling. That way, only people with job prospects get loans. Other students would either have to pay their way or find grants or scholarships. No more unreasonable debts.

    4. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      What you are saying was much more valid back in 2000.

      Today, I know engineering students, genetics students, chemistry students, medical students.

      They are not taking stupid jobs.

      They have to pay full dollar for an education here, for cars here, for cloths here, hell even for movies and music CD's here.

      Meanwhile they are put into competition with people who get everything for about 1/5th the price paid here except automobiles and air conditioners.

      You can't even legally buy the $2.49 DVD's that sell for $16 here and 10 cent pills which sell for $5.00 here and resell them back in the U.S. It's illegal to buy them there for the grossly lower price and reimport them back into the U.S.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    5. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      Which is irrelevant the statement is "no jobs being created", not "not enough new jobs for new workers being created". The unemployment percentage wasn't mentioned because again it is irrelevant to the raw number of jobs.

      The economy is screwed, don't get me wrong on that.

      But if 88000 new jobs be created is "no new jobs" then 85000 h1-b visas being granted is "no h1-b visas".

    6. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by NewYork · · Score: 1

      America should be worried about the creeping caste system in US due to H1B.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_in_india

    7. Re:Interesting- no jobs, but no h1b's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's time to end the H1B program all together. You want to get a job in the US? Become a citizen. Simple as that.

      The right wing loves to talk about buying American and putting Americans first, but then start moronic programs like this.

      I've worked with enough H1B holders to say they're idiots. Culturally they have a hard time understanding deadlines or financial concerns. They tend to stay with their own and will not mix with the rest of the team.

      Many time they inflate their resumes by bribing people at the school in their home country and when they get into a project where they lack skills they stay on the phone with friends in order to get the work done.

      I'm a 2nd generation American. 2nd. Meaning my grandparents on both sides weren't from here. They all became citizens. Wasn't a problem for them. Shouldn't be a problem for all these "super intelligent" H1B people. /rant

  13. Let eBay settle it by Ichijo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If there's a shortage of H-1B visas (meaning there are times you can't obtain one no matter how much you're willing to pay), they should be put up for auction and sold to the highest bidder so everyone who wants one badly enough can get one. It's irresponsible of the government not to look for ways to reduce our tax burden.

    --
    Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    1. Re:Let eBay settle it by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      If there's a shortage of H-1B visas (meaning there are times you can't obtain one no matter how much you're willing to pay), they should be put up for auction and sold to the highest bidder so everyone who wants one badly enough can get one.

      (Presuming it's the sponsor who's bidding...)

      Then give the money bid by the winner:
        - to the worker
        - in addition to the "at least prevailing wage" salary
        - when he leaves the country.

      That would go a long way toward both eliminating the pay disparity (so H1Bs would be used mainly for talent that's REALLY hard to find, rather than just expensive) and encouraging the workers to actually leave after a while. B-)

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    2. Re:Let eBay settle it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you really want companies to stop pushing H1-B visas, allow the visa holder to automatically stay (and be able to switch jobs) instead of shoving them out the door. I've had (and still have) lots of coworkers on these visas, and most of them are absolutely paranoid about losing their jobs. Most managers and companies like that part of the deal as much as any potential money savings because they can squeeze more work out of those people and get more work per dollar.

    3. Re:Let eBay settle it by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      If there's a shortage of H-1B visas (meaning there are times you can't obtain one no matter how much you're willing to pay), they should be put up for auction and sold to the highest bidder so everyone who wants one badly enough can get one.

      (Presuming it's the sponsor who's bidding...)

      Then give the money bid by the winner:

        - to the worker

        - in addition to the "at least prevailing wage" salary

        - when he leaves the country.

      That would go a long way toward both eliminating the pay disparity (so H1Bs would be used mainly for talent that's REALLY hard to find, rather than just expensive) and encouraging the workers to actually leave after a while. B-)

      As other posters have noted, one of the biggest problems with the H1B fiasco is that workers are leaving after awhile and taking the jobs with them. We want to encourage them to stay if they're going to steal the job anyway.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  14. My H1-B solution by cob666 · · Score: 1

    This is only a rough draft but in the right hands has the potential to solve the H1-B 'issues' AND help the unemployment numbers.

    The businesses that are snatching up the visas claim that there is not enough local talent to fill the positions while opponents claim that the lower wages paid the visa holders undercuts any chance of locals filling any of those open positions.

    First, require that H1-B visa holders are paid based on some industry standard adjusted for the region where visa holder is employed.
    Second, require that prior to hiring an H1-B visa worker, the company that holds the visa must hire a local candidate, pay them at the very least minimum wage with medical benefits and then train that person to do the job they lost out to the visa worker within say a 12-18 month period.

    These two rules would remove ANY financial benefit to using the H1-B program, has the potential of easing unemployment, gives people needed training and could even help with the move to off-shoring IT work which seems to be the goal of some of the 'consulting' companies that bring on gobs of H1-B workers.

    Do you think this is feasible?

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law - Aleister Crowley
    1. Re:My H1-B solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First, require that H1-B visa holders are paid based on some industry standard adjusted for the region where visa holder is employed.

      That's already the law. The minimum legal wage depends on experience of the applicant, location and field. Companies get around it to some extent by playing games with what database of salaries to use, with how qualified they say the applicant is, with where the location is and by paying no more than what they have to. Still, the minimum legal wage to pay an H-1B software developer of high skill in the Bay Area is way above the average salary in America, so these minimum requirements aren't completely toothless.

    2. Re:My H1-B solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      Well, maybe feasible but not useful. This might reduce the abuse, but it also works against how H1-Bs are supposed to be used - getting rare skills not available here. I'm here on an H1-B because of skills I have developed over the last 20-30 years, and there's no way I could train anyone to do what I do in 12-18 months (I've been trying!).

  15. Fundamentaly flawed by Ecuador · · Score: 1

    The H1-b program is supposed to attract highly skilled workers. Instead it is used for lowering the cost of workers or for outsourcing firms to train some of their foreign workers to, well, improve their outsourcing offerings.
    It is rather simple to improve it.
    First of all, allow their dependents to work. A good highly skilled professional that won't have a hard time finding a job in the country of his choosing won't elect to go to a country where he has to go through all these hoops and end up a 2nd class citizen with a spouse that is not allowed to work unless they go through the same lengthy (you apply on the April window to get a visa on October) and expensive process.
    Secondly, limit the apps per company based on something like white US/H1-b worker ratio they already have. I don't know if this has changed recently, but I remember up to a few years ago some big outsourcing companies were snagging all the positions.
    Thirdly, prioritize the applications based on qualifications. Accept first the ones who have a graduate degree from an accredited US university, followed by the ones with a US undergrad degree. The US is far ahead in education in many fields. Try to get foreigners who take advantage of it to stay.

    --
    Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    1. Re:Fundamentaly flawed by Ecuador · · Score: 1

      Ok, I have no idea how that "white" before "US/H1-b" got there.

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    2. Re:Fundamentaly flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White power!

      We know your extremist view now KKKcuador.

    3. Re:Fundamentaly flawed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're starting to hear more speakers in direct-contact mediums (C-SPAN being probably the best example) mention that a large, large chunk of these H1 "squatters" are just proxies for Indian phone-support companies who want their best trainers in the best American call centers. They're just doing it with no other intention of undercutting us wage-wise while stealing our resources. It's appalling to be frank. But at least public officials are making some effort to let people hear just why this vampirism is so daggone maddening.

    4. Re:Fundamentaly flawed by richman555 · · Score: 1

      I know my company has laid off workers in order to offshore their jobs. This round of layoffs was 200+. They will leave a skeleton crew around to 'manage' the projects offshore. It has no basis on skill or demand or even creating a better product. It is purely for cheap labor.

  16. Day Wunt Ur Jubzzz!!! by Baldrson · · Score: 1
    funny luking frenurz wont Ur jubzz!! ur jubbzzz!! deay wunturjubzz!!

    (You will notice how I am not only a xenophobic racist in the above exclamation, but I am inarticulate if not down right illiterate. This merely goes to show that people of my race/gender/age (white/male/old) not only must, as an urgent economic necessity, be displaced by importing hundreds of thousands if not millions from abroad, but that we deserve to be displaced.)

    1. Re:Day Wunt Ur Jubzzz!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds great! You first.

      Lets take a family off the streets of Guatemala and give them what you have. You can go live in poverty where "your kind" belong (using your standard).

    2. Re:Day Wunt Ur Jubzzz!!! by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      Attempt at sarcasm fail. The people you were trying to mock are not xenophobic Bush-loving Repubs; most of them are union-supporting anti-corporate liberals. IT workers and slashdot in general are heavily biased towards Dems.

      Although liberals are generally pro-immigrant (esp. for undocumented ones), if it's *their* jobs that are on the chopping block, opinion changes fast. Another thing is that H1B smacks of corporate greed trying to displace expensive local workers with cheap indentured servants, well because that's what it is.

  17. consulting companies, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    And who uses the "consulting companies"? Your local company. They use these "consulting companies" for their IT needs.

    And in the meantime they bitch and moan about the lack of local talent.

    Listen folks: business people are two faced liars. Anyone who defends them is the same.

    1. Re:consulting companies, by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      And who uses the "consulting companies"? Your local company. They use these "consulting companies" for their IT needs.

      And in the meantime they bitch and moan about the lack of local talent.

      Listen folks: business people are two faced liars. Anyone who defends them is the same.

      Nope, not my "local company". Mostly it's the big guys that ARE NOT on the H1-B Top List: Microsoft, Google, IBM, others...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:consulting companies, by buybuydandavis · · Score: 2

      And who uses the "consulting companies"? Your local company. They use these "consulting companies" for their IT needs.

      And in the meantime they bitch and moan about the lack of local talent.

      Listen folks: business people are two faced liars. Anyone who defends them is the same.

      Nope, not my "local company". Mostly it's the big guys that ARE NOT on the H1-B Top List: Microsoft, Google, IBM, others...

      And government contract work, again through contract agencies. The Pimps, as I affectionately call them.

      I'd be surprised if even 10% of the quota is filled with direct hire, H1B to Employer hires, with no mediating Pimp.

    3. Re:consulting companies, by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      And who uses the "consulting companies"? Your local company. They use these "consulting companies" for their IT needs.

      And in the meantime they bitch and moan about the lack of local talent.

      Listen folks: business people are two faced liars. Anyone who defends them is the same.

      I know people who still think their house should be worth 1.5 million because that is what they used to sell for in 2007.

      What?! It has 2 acres. That should be worth $500,000 an acre right!?

      But they fail to see the reality of not everyone is a doctor, CEO, or lawyer who is willing to pay that since the banks want 20% down now for jumbo mortgages and those reading this comment probably can not afford that except for 2% of the readers.

      When you pay X for Y time your brain gets hardwired to figure that is how much X should be worth. Same iwth gas prices. Now we do not care that they are over $3.00/gallon. In 2001 we would be pissing our pants and cutting out expenses.

      The HR robots and beancounters got used to cheap in-disposable labor for 7 years where 4 applicants applied per 1 job! Maybe 10 if you count the .com pop since 2001? So $39,000 a year for a entry level JR program/LAN admin is considered expensive. No one should pay more than $55,000 for an I.T job because we have never offered that in the history we worked here.

      Now the ball is returning back to the employee in negotiations. In Florida it is still an employers job market. I was offiered $13.50/hr to administrator MS Exchange on a Lan admin level?! They wanted 5 years experience and up to date Microsoft credentials on top of that. That is how much an Indian H1B1 made so why pay more??

    4. Re: consulting companies, by iamhassi · · Score: 2

      I'm shocked how many IT and programming jobs want to pay $12 an hour but require a bachelors in computer science. If H1-B employees are willing to work for so little I can see why companies are begging for them.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  18. They need more H1-Bs everywhere but where they are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When will the fast food companies of America realize that they can recruit a pool of highly skilled workers content to work for lower wages? These workers would revolutionize the fast food industry as they would be the polite, biddable, dependable workers they have always been looking for. All kidding aside if they will be content with the salary of a manager at McDonalds- make them the manager at McDonalds! Things would be so much better than being served by criminals and completely unmotivated individuals that constantly create long lines and traffic problems clogging up the arteries of our cities. I ask you what is the most common type of person you see working these jobs? Quite simply disenfranchised Americans and the elderly pulled out of retirement. The REAL problem is typecasting the American worker like we are all in some sort of social punishment experiment. Made a wrong turn in life? Just one? Now you have to work at any number of service based positions you are FORCED to. As for the people that deserve a reward well they have never had the sin of being American hanging around their necks like an albatross. Yes, these people deserve a chance- a chance to wash my car or clean my house or some landscaping or construction. This is because that is the same chance all of our immigrant lineage deserved when they came to this country originally. This because that is the same chance I would get as an American trying to make a life in just about any foreign country outside of North America. What should actually happen is that if you open your doors to us, we open our doors to you.

  19. Drives me nuts by CODiNE · · Score: 1

    So every company has a semi-random assortment of software and languages already in use.

    They don't want to have someone they need to train a little bit, no they want someone with 3 - 5 years minimum on every single bit of tech they have.

    Out of a thousand potential employees there's only going to be a few that hit the magic combination of experiences you want, and dozens who will lie about it.

    Oh screw that, if we go global and add a few billion people to the mix we can hit 10x the number of "perfect matches" and lower the salary some more. So what if there's good workers right around the corner who could pick up our system nice and quick, if they want jobs they'll have to move to Australia or something.

    --
    Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    1. Re:Drives me nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Problem is not that at all. Training doesn't work. You cannot train someone to be Picasso, similarly you cannot train someone to code like Linus. Sad truth is world needs less and less work. Everything is automated now. All jobs are disappearing and remaining ones require unreachable levels of talent and knowledge for regular persons. Unfortunately for you, fixing this is almost impossible due to Americans' obsession with the market capitalism.

    2. Re:Drives me nuts by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Parent talked about training in the specific technologies that the company uses. Just look around how many web frameworks are there.

    3. Re:Drives me nuts by PRMan · · Score: 1

      OK, so I taught myself HTML5 and CSS3 and Canvas programming and JQuery at home in my spare time. While not having "5 years experience" in these topics, I listed them in the talents section of my resume (which got by the HR filters) and I spoke eloquently about it in detail in my interview at my current company and got the job. People on here need to stop whining and start working a little harder (and I am pretty lazy myself).

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    4. Re:Drives me nuts by isorox · · Score: 1

      Problem is not that at all. Training doesn't work. You cannot train someone to be Picasso, similarly you cannot train someone to code like Linus. Sad truth is world needs less and less work. Everything is automated now. All jobs are disappearing and remaining ones require unreachable levels of talent and knowledge for regular persons. Unfortunately for you, fixing this is almost impossible due to Americans' obsession with the market capitalism.

      Linux might be a great coder, but does he have 10 years experience with java 7? I can get that from my h1bs.

  20. How about a national job pool? by satch89450 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One of the issues that always comes up when talking about H-1B is that employers say they can't satisfy their needs with the talent already available. So, how about adding the requirement that any H-1B applications require the company post a "Help Wanted" ad in a national database for three months before the application is approved. Let's see why companies don't like citizen talent. Let's see how citizens can fill those jobs.

    1. Re:How about a national job pool? by Shados · · Score: 1

      The biggest consumers of H-1B visas do just that. Want to work at Google, Microsoft, Amazon, whatever? If you're good enough, you can get a job there pretty much whenever you want. Their ads are all over the place all over the country, and obviously on all the big job advertisement web sites. The salaries are often totally out of wack compared to other jobs with similar education/experience requirements, and so are the benefits. And they're STILL looking for people.

      I work for a a smaller (but still somewhat large, 1 billion-ish a year) company in Boston. Entry level positions give 80k, senior positions will go between 130-200k, all that not counting the really generous bonuses and options (that are actually worth using, and are paid out 100% of the time). The codebase is pristine, the technology stack bleeding edge, the desktop machines are extremely high end, food is free, and the projects are awesome.

      Still have a lot of trouble filling in our positions. Why? Because we're competing with a -lot- of companies that give the same benefits. There's way more positions to fill than there are qualified people.

      Now if the H-1Bs are used to hire random cheap morons, as I'm sure some do, thats a waste. We sure don't use them for that =P

    2. Re:How about a national job pool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is already a requirement that a position must be 'posted publicly' for some time before using H1-B. It's trivially simple to obey the 'letter' of this requirement while ignoring the 'spirit'.

      For example, I have seen these job openings posted in the lunchrooms of larger companies - which meets the definition of a 'public posting'.

      If nobody who sees the notice applies for the job, then the company can (legally) say that they *tried* to find candidates locally, but were unable to do so, thus, with a heavy heart, they are forced to use the H1-B program.

    3. Re:How about a national job pool? by erice · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One of the issues that always comes up when talking about H-1B is that employers say they can't satisfy their needs with the talent already available. So, how about adding the requirement that any H-1B applications require the company post a "Help Wanted" ad in a national database for three months before the application is approved. Let's see why companies don't like citizen talent. Let's see how citizens can fill those jobs.

      A requirement similar to this already exists. It is quire trivial to work around. All it takes is to write a list of requirements that exactly much the foreign person you want to hire (or retain) and virtually no one else in the world. Then you place the ad wherever it is least likely to be seen. A mid-week newspaper classified will do. For extra insurance, the only contact method should be a PO BOX.

    4. Re:How about a national job pool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's way more positions to fill than there are qualified people.

       
      Yep. The real problem is that there is a lot of people who aren't nearly as qualified as they think. They've got a few flavor-of-the-month certifications, a couple of dead end entry level jobs on their resume... and they think they're God's own gift to IT and rate senior salaries. They don't seem to realize the dot bomb detonated over a decade ago now, employers aren't lining up to desperately grab anyone with a pulse and a barely passing grade on their Introduction to HTML course anymore.

    5. Re:How about a national job pool? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's something like that, and what they do is ask the H1B person to list every skill that they have, then pare off the ones that where they couldn't find even the tiniest hint of plausibility as to how it could come up at work, and write the job listing based off of the remaining list. Want to fill our open database position? Well, hopefully you know Java and Pascal and COBOL and PHP and C/C++ and LISP and Russian and the mathematical concept of topology!

    6. Re:How about a national job pool? by guruevi · · Score: 1

      IF you REALLY need that type of talent, then H1B is not the way to do it. I work at a University, we hire talent from all over the world and there are many other ways of hiring PhD-levels and people that have really high skills, there are special visa's for that. H1B is to get cheap "talent" and the University uses it as well to get PhD's on a project for a $30k salary.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  21. Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by t0qer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just scrolling through the +5 comments, I see a ton of xenophobia...

    Can't find an entry level IT job? Where are you? Arkansas? Here in silicon valley, we're experiencing another surge in hiring. I'm pretty low on the skillset, so whenever I get myself back into IT, I consider the economy to be doing well. Case in point... Company I work for. We've been losing a ton of local talent to google who's been on a hiring binge. When a small shop like ours (120 or so employees) can afford to pay great salaries, but we lose out to name brands like google, we have to turn to H1B.

    And for the H1B worker, life isn't all cherries and apple pie. Case in point, this big ass march from immigration voice.
    http://imgur.com/YKxR6NG

    See the white guy with pelican case in tow? That's me.

    Let's say you're here from India on H1B and you have a family emergency. You have to go home. So many H1B's are scared to go home, because when they try to return more often than not, they're denied re-entry into the country. I haven't met a single H1B that wouldn't LOVE to be a US citizen, but instead we give them a non-citizen status as an H1B that gives them basically no rights as a US citizen.

    I think we should just trash H1B altogether, and allow anyone of decent education (BA or BS) come live here, become a citizen, and pay taxes.

    As slashdotters, we shouldn't hate on the H1B people. They are not the problem. It's our policy, the very creation of H1B to sidestep proper citizenship that is.

    1. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Karl+Cocknozzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure if it is "xenophobia" to truthfully say that we have a jobs crisis in this country and are importing foreigners to drive down wages on the few remaining middle-class wage jobs. That's not "Xenophobia," that's mathematics.

      --
      Who did what now?
    2. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 0

      Just scrolling through the +5 comments, I see a ton of xenophobia...

      Then you are jumping at shadows. Maybe one of the +5 comments was xenophobic. Maybe, he made a comment about staffing what are basically military jobs. None of the other +5s, or even formerly +5, comments had any xenophobia at all much less tons.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are tons of IT jobs in Arkansas. I got my entry level job at Walmart. They (and their suppliers) employ thousands of IT workers.

    4. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free imigration is over, we no longer want your lame and your sick, we need to take care of our own people first. The government has a responsibility to take care of the citizens that are HERE AND NOW, before reaching out to non-americans. The government is for the people and by the people, it is alive due to us paying our taxes, it owes to us first. We have our own who are unemploid, who are sick, and who are hungry, we don't need anymore chinese or indian, they have their own nation that should be taking care of them. Our country needs to take of its own people first farmost. We have the talent pool here, we are graduating thousands of EE and CS majors, all tallented, I know this I work in a very large University.

      And you t0qer, if you do not like and do not wish to support your own countrymen first, and put them ahead of those from others, then go find a form of government and economical structure that you like in another nation, go live in russia or korea for a while. I assure you, we do not need your kind in USA, what we need is for our people to worry about their own first, and only after we've fed every hungry american, and clothed them, and got them job befit their skill, should we begin worrying about others.

    5. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      ...which will never happen.

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    6. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does your company not offer candidates relocation services?

    7. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 this, this and more this.

      Either open the border to drive down the prices in other fields like Medical care and Education or stop driving out the domestic information workers.

    8. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name IRL is Ninad, and I used to know t0qer IRL. A great guy and he's white. I'm Indian. I stayed in the US for close to 13 years. Got two bachelor's degrees- one in aerospace engineering and one in mechanical engineering with three minors. Also got a masters in mechanical engineering. I got hired by a great company that tried to get me an H1B but I didn't win the lottery. Next year, they tried again and I got it in October 2008. In February 2009 I, along with 500 other people was laid off at the height of the recession. I got another job, but USCIS denied transfer of my H1B visa that was, as far as I'm concerned, well deserved after my degrees, my work experience (all in the US mind you!) and significant hardships. While folks could afford to "take a year or two off" after college, I couldn't. I didn't mind it because a US education really is one of the finest in the world. I like the fact that (many) Americans really are color blind and look at only talent.

      However, I have noticed that ironically, a Republican govt., focused as it is purely on profit, is better for legal immigrants (or those trying to immigrate legally) and tough on illegal immigrants who btw have real problems of their own, but just saying. Dems, on the other hand, are the other way around. Of course, given the abominable position of the Reps on environment and social justice issues I was always a Dem supporter, again ironically because USCIS under the Obama admin ruined my chance at stayin in, and yes, paying into the tax income of the US in exchange for a good life I'd built there.

      After the rejection by the USCIS, I had to return to India. After some time, I've managed to find good work in the renewable energy space using my US education and am working for a Chinese company. I would have loved to work for a US company IN the US, pay taxes, buy a house, raise a family etc and still do but misplaced protectionist policies of the USCIS and the Obama admin. cut the wheat with the chaff. Here's a funny story: I used to go to the USCIS office week after week to hear back from them about my visa transfer application. After a while, an older ethnic Philippino gentleman, himself an immigrant and now employee at the USCIS asked me what my qualifications were. When I told him, he exclaimed, "We need people like you over here!". A week later, my rejection came through, and 15 days after that, I wound up my life over the previous 13 years into one backup, one suitcase of books and meagre (after paying costs and fees) savings and returned to India.

      The admin really needs to incentivise quick greencards for people who get US degrees, and are good enough to get jobs through fair competition! It makes NO sense to kick them out only for them to work for foreign companies which are going to increase pressure for US companies to hire cheap labor!

    9. Re:Am I the only one not scared of Indian workers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The admin really needs to incentivise quick greencards for people who get US degrees, and are good enough to get jobs through fair competition! It makes NO sense to kick them out only for them to work for foreign companies which are going to increase pressure for US companies to hire cheap labor!

      Well said. It's unbelievable how short-sighted current immigration policy is on this point. Nice post overall.

  22. What kind of a site is Slashdot? by PhamNguyen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe it's time to clarify what kind of a site Slashdot is? It claims to be "News for Nerds" but there are a lot of nerds who have H-1B visas, or live outside the US.

    This article's title is just plain nasty. There is room for debate on these issues, and I personally think the numbers of H-1B visas are excessive (or better put, the requirements for getting one are too lenient), but the idea that people applying for H-1B's are to be despised is very offputting to potential users of this site. Unless, of course, Slashdot isn't really for these people in which case you should be more explicit about that.

    On the issue of H-1B's themselves, it is necessary to separate out generic issues of free trade, from issues that are specific to trade in human labor. Any valuable commidity will benefit country that imports it. If there were a ban on importing rare earth metals to the US, and suddently this was lifted, it would benefit companies that utilize these metals (and ultimately consumers) and harm producers of rare earth metals. However the net benefit would be positive, this is standard economic theory. Now I imagine that when the ban is lifted, the rare earth producers would say "there is no shortage of rare earth metals, people just aren't willing to pay a fair price. If people paid more, we could mine previously uneconomic deposits, etc.". This would be a mistaken interpretation, again because economic theory says that the welfare of society is maximized under free trade.

    Now this theory breaks down when it applies to people, but only because of externalities. That is, people who come to the US on H-1B visas may have a negative influence on the US apart from their impact on the labor force. Some of these are simply because a person in the US temporarily will be less engaged with the community and civil society. Also many Americans prefer that the US retain its cultural and ethinc composition, and so these people may be negatively affected.

    So there are many valid arguments against H-1B visas, although most of the economic arguments are wrong. I think the criteria should be stricter so that only the people who add the most value to the economy can get one. This way, the US would get the maximum benefit for the minimum number of people. A masters degree should be a minimum.

    Anyway that is my view on H-1B visas but can we please keep personal animosity towards people on H-1B's out of it?

    1. Re:What kind of a site is Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah this. Or we could just hang the fuckers.

    2. Re:What kind of a site is Slashdot? by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      " I think the criteria should be stricter so that only the people who add the most value to the economy can get one."

      Well that's marvelously vague. Are you a congressman?

    3. Re:What kind of a site is Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look at the comments. No one with high mods is being nasty to foreign workers, they're being nasty to American employers because American employers are the ones dicking over American workers. There's nothing xenophobic about it, and it's also rational.

    4. Re:What kind of a site is Slashdot? by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

      I was complaining about the title of this article, in particular its sneering tone, and the implicit assumption in this and many other submissions that everyone on this site is American. I don't like the assumption that jobs for American IT workers are good, when many readers are IT workers outside the US, and therefore competing with Americans for those jobs. While it's not for non-Americans to decide what visa rules of the US should be, I object to this site taking the position that whatever is good for American IT workers (and possibly bad for non-American IT workers) is good, and whatever is bad for American IT workers is bad.

      I already explained my position on H-1B's (which is the position almost any orthodox economist would take): they are indeed bad for US IT workers, but they may be good for the US as a whole. But if a person wanted to use what I consider to be incorrect economic reasoning to argue that H-1B visas harmed the economy because they lowered wages, then I'm not going to call the xenophobic.

    5. Re:What kind of a site is Slashdot? by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

      That is an unfair criticism given that I also said that a masters degree should be a minimum. Also, why should I be specific, it's not like my slashdot post will be the basis for legislation. Do you seriously think I'm trying to create some wiggle room for myself so I can't be held accountable for my Slashdot post later on, when I propose very weak restrictions on H-1B visas? Or are you just trying to score a cheap shot instead of addressing my actual arguments? Perhaps you are more suited to politics.

  23. If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by blue9steel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the shortage is so terrible why aren't we seeing tons of stories talking about exploding pay rates and people hopping from company to company because of ridiculous job offers? Oh that's right, it's because there is no shortage of talent, just an unwillingness for them to pay the market rate.

    1. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 30 open positions right now. I've had less than 30 people submit resumes. There is an overabundance of programming jobs that makes it impossible for most companies to create the software they need. Our pay is what Amazon would pay plus 10% so while it isn't great, it shouldn't be that much of a barrier. Of course the job ads do not mention the pay so pay can't be the problem. The only people winning with the current talent-starved system are the recruiters. We've spent $6k w/ Linkedin, $20k w/ monster.com, almost $60k in salaries for in-house recruiters, and over $30k for recruiting agencies so far. I've interviewed seven people, extended offers to two, and had one accept. That's $116k spent for only one employee. I don't understand how anyone can claim that companies aren't spending enough money on programmers.

      As an aside, the guy we hired was the best Java programmer that we interviewed. It took him over two months to get a simple JSP page that read a field from a database. I could have done that in thirty minutes with PHP. Don't tell me that giving the guy over $21k in salary plus about $4k in benefits for that small task was anything other than "exploding pay." In any other field if you cost so much and contributed so little, you would be fired. You might even be sued by your employer for being a fraud. In /.'s world, people whine about not getting paid enough for doing nothing.

    2. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

      I would, with all respect, call this "interesting". With a ridiculously high salary offer it's also very likely you'll get fired in the next few years because a company can't pay ridiculous salaries in the long run. (You want an other .com bubble? No. Companies also have learned a lot from that lesson.)

      Also. If there is just not enough talent now, you don't solve that by paying more. That will not increase the number of skilled people.
      If there is no shortage of talent, as you claim, and there are enough available jobs, which is the case, then people just don't want to work in it, which would mean there IS shortage of talent.

      Where I work the salary is good, but it's impossible to find people, just like the ac says in the other reaction.

      If it's true what you say, and there IS enough talent, you're very welcome to send the people over. I'm sure we can negotiate some bonus for you for skilled people. But so far we haven't refused people because they demanded too much.

      --
      Privacy is terrorism.
    3. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      Sounds like you need to hire me. I could have done what he did in Java in 30 minutes. I've written half a million lines of code in the last 4 years and written a workflow system that handles hundreds of thousands of transactions per day.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    4. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by CyprusBlue113 · · Score: 1

      Of course the job ads do not mention the pay so pay can't be the problem.

      This is the stupidest thing I have ever read. If you have high pay, advertise it and you'll get lots more interest. Oh you don't want to be stuck paying what you advertise, or your advertisement turns people off because it's too low? There's your problem right there. I generally ignore any job that won't tell you up front what their salary band is. I'm a CCIE. Good luck finding that talent being a cheap ass. Good, fast, cheap, pick 2.

      --
      a handful of selfish greedy people are no match for millions of selfish, greedy people -u4ya
    5. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Vicarius · · Score: 1

      I'm sure we can negotiate some bonus for you for skilled people. But so far we haven't refused people because they demanded too much.

      There is another side of that coin. Whenever I get calls from recruiters (even though I removed my resume from public places years ago), I tell them I am not interested. I tell them that, because I am confident that they will not offer me what I need to consider switching jobs. I simply don't believe that after wasting a lot of my time on interviews, I would be given an acceptable offer. It is easier to stay out of the job market and say that I am not interested.

      I am not desperate. I have a good job. I have good qualifications and skills. However, I will not bite an empty hook. Some vague description of the job and non-narrow pay range will not entice me to apply for that unknown job. I simply don't need it. If you need me, you'll have to do the work to make me want to work for you.

      If IT salaries experienced the same kind of growth that CEO salaries experienced over last 20 years, then I would be on the job market even while being satisfied with my current job. Pay and perception of the average pay do matter.

    6. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      "Our pay is what Amazon would pay plus 10%"

      (i.e. not enough)

      QED

    7. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      " Don't tell me that giving the guy over $21k in salary plus about $4k in benefits for that small task was anything other than "exploding pay."

      I won't. But you should be fired for hiring him.

    8. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an MS in computer science and haven't once been approached by a recruiter. Not in a hurry to move from what I'm currently doing, but I have trouble believing there's a shortage of talent.

    9. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is just not enough talent now, you don't solve that by paying more. That will not increase the number of skilled people.

      That's true but beside the point. For that company, it solves the immediate problem of not having enough skilled people at that company. It does so by taking people from other companies. That makes the other companies desperate and leads them to increase salaries. Eventually you reach a point where everyone's salary is up. It's a variant of the prisoner's dilemma. Companies are better off if they all don't increase salaries, but for any one company, it's better off if it increases salaries.

      I actually think that the best way to handle this is to create a new type of visa, a training visa. With a training visa, the company has to pay the government the cost to educate a native to the same level as the foreigner. In addition, the company needs to hire someone with a similar background but lacking the experience that the foreign applicant has. In return, the government allows companies to hire arbitrary amounts of people on training visas. If someone has training visas continually for some period of time, then that person can get a green card and become a citizen.

      That would address the complaint higher in the thread that consulting companies are eating up all the H-1B visas for jobs that they plan to fill overseas after the visa expires. It would allow companies that really do want to source talent globally to do so. It would promote native hiring for those companies that currently hire mostly H-1B applicants. It would support education to solve the long term problem (a shortage of talent).

      It would also address the abuse where companies fake requirements to hire a specific foreign applicant over a marginally less qualified native applicant. They would still have to hire the native applicant. This increases their costs but still allows them to address the need if it's really that pressing. If not, then it pushes them to settle for the native applicant rather than the foreign applicant.

    10. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Whenever I get calls from recruiters (even though I removed my resume from public places years ago), I tell them I am not interested.

      Maybe this is why some people on here can't get good jobs. Didn't you read what the guy above said? He pays a fortune to Monster and recruiters. Need a job? Throw your resume on Monster and wait for the recruiters to start calling. Or, if they're already calling you, talk to them.

      I maintain a good relationship with 5 recruiters at any given time. I chat with them for 5 minutes whenever they call and just let them know where I'm at. If things aren't going well at work for some reason (lame new manager, no good projects), I let them know that.

      When my last boss started becoming an absolute tyrant, I let my 3-4 recruiter friends know that I was looking. But not only that, I wanted to recover the money I had lost in my wage during the recession, so I told them I wouldn't move unless I was making 20% more. It took a little longer, but I eventually got 2 offers and used them against each other and got what I wanted.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    11. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've written half a million lines of code in the last 4 years

      No, you have not. That's more than 300 lines of code for every day of those four years, or almost 500 per workday: A line for every minute of the workday. You may have generated half a million lines of code, but if you wrote 500000 lines, I assure you that you wrote lines of crap, not code.

    12. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I've written half a million lines of code in the last 4 years

      No, you have not. That's more than 300 lines of code for every day of those four years, or almost 500 per workday: A line for every minute of the workday. You may have generated half a million lines of code, but if you wrote 500000 lines, I assure you that you wrote lines of crap, not code.

      Sure I have. I don't know where you work where there are only 300 minutes in a day, but my typical workweek for the last 6 years has been 60 hours a week. I've had basically no vacations, and at the very beginning I was really into what I was doing and was excited about it and it was saving the company tens of thousands of dollars a month because it replaced a horribly inefficient system that the operations staff was using where you had to do a dozen mouse clicks and have four different browser windows up cutting and pasting back and forth to accomplish a given task. I wrote most of that code in the first two years and it has been slowing down ever since.
      Today, on the other hand, I am lucky if I get 100 lines of code written, and a lot of the time I am rewriting what I did before to make it more efficient. But mostly, I am stuck supporting some really awful VB code that I inherited from some people who apparently learned programming in a clean room where there are no exceptions, timeouts, network issues or other problems. So nowadays I spend the first 10 hours of my day dealing with that crap, and then I am lucky if I am able to do 100 lines of code after that because I am so worn out.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    13. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A line of code for every minute of the workday. If your coding is as sloppy as your reading, I don't want to see your code even if you write just a tenth of what you claim you wrote. Even with a 60 hour work week, 500000 lines of code in four years is completely unrealistic, unless much of it is generated boiler-plate code. Either you're bullshitting us or you're delusional about your performance.

    14. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't the job ads mention the pay?

      Why don't you offer more pay to your employees and less to recruiters?

      If you were paying a higher rate wouldn't you attract better qualified individuals?

    15. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is no shortage of talent, as you claim, and there are enough available jobs, which is the case, then people just don't want to work in it, which would mean there IS shortage of talent.

      Or, just possibly, there's a combination of 1) talented workers who don't want to take a pay cut to leave their current positions, and 2) talented workers who could easily do jobs they aren't 100% qualified for on paper, and won't get past the acronym-obsessed HR filters.

    16. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with foreigners getting our jobs if they are willing to do it for cheap because they are willing to live frugally.

      Yes, Virginia, there IS something wrong when you're advised to go into a particular field, study hard, get good grades, and you will be well paid - only to discover that after graduation, you're deep in debt and the jobs open to you don't pay shit.

      The whole reason for busting your butt in school and getting the degree is so that you DON'T have to live frugally. I know it's not fair, our grandparents went through the same shit in the Depression, etc. That doesn't mean you're not getting swindled out of the comfortable future you were encouraged to work so hard for. The powers that be changed the rules to their benefit, which is why people are angry at being forced to pinch pennies.

    17. Re:If shortage == true then pay = pay + 1 by guruevi · · Score: 1

      That's bullshit. I hired people before, you can run hundreds of jobs for that budget. We sift through hundreds of applicants for a single job - PhD-level programmer in medical image processing, we don't even have to post on Monster, we simply get dozens of request through our own website.

      Programmers are a dime a dozen, a halfway decent Java/PHP programmer can be had for $40k and I have plenty of friends that are looking for jobs and moving away to take them at minimal rates. If you really have an employee that can't create a simple JSP page in 2 months, then you have really shitty management, if you can't find an employee to save your life, you have really shitty hiring processes.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
  24. Who's Hiring H-1B Visa Workers? by emaname · · Score: 2

    Here's one perspective re this issue.

    Who's Hiring H-1B Visa Workers? It's Not Who You Might Think

    --
    An effective "democracy" creates the illusion the people have a say in their government.
  25. Ah yes, you are sooo right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    . If you interview anything like how you type, I'm not at all surprised that you're frustrated.

    Yeah, because a Slashdot rant is indicative of how one is in real life.

    Unbelievable.

    Nice, ad hominem, btw. Kudos for the moderation points.

    I once worked for some folks years ago. While they were being sued for 20 million dollars, they wondered why their employees kept their mouth shut about their problems. They were sued for tens of millions by their customers and eventually prosecuted by the SEC because anyone who said anything negative were accused of having a "bad attitude".

    Something for you to think about.

    1. Re:Ah yes, you are sooo right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, you're only allowed to claim fallacies when your argument is one of logic... Since your entire argument is that you aren't worth shit to anyone, it is quite reasonable to ask if, maybe, it's because you actually aren't worth shit?

      Your biggest objective complaint is the drop from $100K per year to the so-called slave wage of a mere $60K per year. I know literal geniuses who've opted for $60K or less, sometimes much less, just to pursue their passions. I am following suit, despite not quite being in their league. To hell with you and your sense of entitlement.

      The good news, for me at least, is that the MBA has finally become a worthless degree. Thanks for sharing that; I delight in the misery of throngs of opportunistic fucks who really thought they were buying an E-ticket for the Golden Parachute ride. You dreamed of becoming a Master (however benevolent I'm sure you imagined yourself to be), failed, and now rage over remaining a Slave.

      You're now probably thinking of replying to me to say how it can happen to me, etc. Unlike you, I've thought of that already. I've never taken the easy path in life, and I know that in a few years I might be living on the street despite a lot more work and education than you seem to have had. I know that, most likely, my extensive quantitative training has a `shelf life' of 10-15 years on the outside. I know that it is a possibility, however remote, that we may soon be under martial law (or at least something effectively indistinguishable). I know that within a decade, I might have to stow away on a cargo ship to Mexico and then hop to Paraguay or Brazil in order to pursue wealth, liberty and happiness, and that I would become what you are sneering at: desperate foreign competition.

      I hope this won't happen, and I will do what I can, but note well: ``The wind of change is blowing through this continent" as well, and ``The mills of the gods grind slowly, but exceedingly fine."

  26. Easy Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1B program has some flaws which are easy to fix. One thing that we should make sure H1B program does not do is offshore more jobs.

    H1B program is designed to make the employee completely dependent on employer for everything. Switching jobs is difficult too. Thats the reason why salaries can be less for H1B 'in some cases'. A quick fix is to free the employee from the employer. If someone is on H1B, give him/her ability to work with any damn employer with no bureaucratic hassles. This would bring up the wages that can be depressed with H1Bs. I know a ton of H1Bs who couldn't go to their countries for fear of getting stuck in bureaucratic hassles at embassies. One example is someone going to leave for 3 weeks to India, he has to get VISA stamped while coming back to US, goes to consulate and gets stuck in 'background check' for 3-6 months. Most employers would fire him since he can't work for them in US for that time. So, mostly people who are on H1B do not go out of the country till they get a Green Card. I am sure there are a couple of million of them who are like that which would mean atleast 1 million air travels and to top off most of them shopping well to take stuff back home. Look at the impact on the economy this would have.

    In the name of stopping abuse, congress is only adding more bureaucratic hassle on top of already existing hassles. Just free them from employers and see what positive impact it can have on job market and economy.

    1. Re:Easy Fix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. Just make H1Bs independent of employers. Reason why employers file H1Bs is not because they are paid less. In fact, most of them are paid equal or more than market rate. But a H1B will most likely not leave them for years. Take that incentive away by making H1Bs close to EADs, where they can work for any employer. I can definitely say that hiring a H1B is harder than hiring a citizen. It costs between 5-7K for filing H1B. If you take the incentive have H1B not completely dependent on employers, even fewer employers will file H1Bs.

  27. You are right! And a woman shortage, too!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My mother tells me that I am sooo handsome, intelligent, and just wonderful. She asks, "Why are you still single at 47?!"

    I tell her, "Mom. There just isn't any adequate women for me!"

    She says," You're 5'7", 200 lbs, with enough hair on your head. What's the issue!"

    I say,"Mom. There isn't any 5' 10" blond haired, 25 year old, MDs with PhD in Particle Physics, with big tits, who love giving blow jobs on the first date, and great legs out there! Women are so pathetic these days!!"

    My mother agrees with me!

    I'm also an IT hiring manager BTW.

  28. CS is not IT and stuff like subnetting is tech sch by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 2

    CS is not IT and stuff like subnetting is tech / trades school

  29. Will they remember to turn out the lights? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    If you are an unemployed techy type ... well, let's just say you'd better start picking alternative countries.

    Any bets whether they'll remember to turn out the lights as they leave?

    Like ALL of them? B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
    1. Re:Will they remember to turn out the lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just once I would like to see Atlas Shrugged turned on its head, and have all the IT people go fucking Galt on the worthless suits running the big companies.

      The US is an information economy now, and most of our economic activity is based on moving data around in cleverer ways. I would LOVE to see the suits shitting their pants when they are left holding the keys to the server room with no fucking clue how to work anything. We knowledge workers are the "motor of the world" now. Keep shitting on us and we'll go on strike, you greedy motherfuckers.

    2. Re:Will they remember to turn out the lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called having a union. Try it sometime, you might not get in this shit in the future.

    3. Re:Will they remember to turn out the lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is a fine idea. Unfortunately, in America today, unions are very unpopular because the corporations fight them and bust them while convincing the working class stiffs that unions are corrupt, meddlesome, demand excessive dues, etc. etc.

      So you end up with most people resenting union workers because their demand for higher wages are "unfair" and "drive up the cost of goods" or "drive companies out of business." It's a lose-lose proposition. I hope that will change someday.

      Actually, unions are bit of an anachronism nowadays because they pit labor against management. I'm in favor of more "democratic capitalism," with more employee-owned companies and cooperatives taking the place of traditional hierarchical management structures (read: fiefdoms). Labor won't be pitted against management because labor IS the management!

  30. Global Economy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bitch and complain all you want. It is a global economy. If they don't import these people, then they will export the jobs. You can cite poor results from outsourced jobs, but it the fact that it is not slowing down shows that companies don't care. This is the way it is - period.

  31. Make US collgle free or much lower cost with loans by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Make US collgle free or much lower cost. Plan B is loans with a income based repayment plan with a low MAX interest rate. Say X% over an amount that is a somewhat over min wage. and make you so that if you get a good paying job you can pay if off quicker and pay less over all. But if you say best you can get is a job in food service or even a good but not as high paying good like a costco or some other place that is better pay then a place like BK or bestbuy you pay little to none on your loan and after 10-15 years you don't have to deal with it any more.

    Banks with put the presser on the schools to lower costs and tech needed skills / dump joke degrees if people who get them there best job is Starbucks and the bank loses a 60-80K+ loan.

  32. You're a programmer and you want a job? by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    Here it companies are fighting over new employees. It's almost impossible to find qualified people.
    Please, send them over!

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.
  33. Re:Make US collgle free or much lower cost with lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I argue 2 points

    one kill the student loans outright, when people cant get money to pay the obscene amounts these overglorified daycares charge maybe their prices will come down to the level of service they actually provide

    two, make the colleges actually worth going to, I was part of an interview recently where the guy had good grades and showed great book knowledge, but when showed a basic lm317 constant current led circuit couldn't explain it. If your not into electronics, its darn simple stuff

  34. What a weak response. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nobody here cares about your apologies for shitty business practices.

  35. You guys aren't in the Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I manage a software dev group in the Bay Area.

    I have three openings and I can pay serious money to fill them - 130k++, but I just can't find the people. I have 10 people working for me in India - this isn't because I want to, or my leadership - it's because I can't hire the people here in the US. When I try to hire people here in the Bay Area, I very rarely get a US born applicant - most people are from India or China and believe me, I'd love to be able to hire US citizens who can communicate in decent English (I can be non-PC because I'm an anonymous coward).

    All you posters who are complaining about letting in too many foreign born programmers who take your jobs - come to the Bay Area and find a job here - it's a great place to live and I'd love to hire you if you're a decent Java programmer. Until then, increase the number if H1Bs so I can hire the only alternative, which is foreign-born software developers.

    Anonymous frustrated hiring Manager

    1. Re:You guys aren't in the Bay Area by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have 10 people working for me in India - this isn't because I want to, or my leadership - it's because I can't hire the people here in the US. When I try to hire people here in the Bay Area

      Has it ever occurred to you that there are parts of the US other than the Bay Area? And that the reason more Americans don't move there is because no one can afford it if they have a family. If you're willing to send work to India, then why aren't you willing to send it to other parts of the US where the cost of living is lower and talented people are available?

    2. Re:You guys aren't in the Bay Area by russbutton · · Score: 1
      I'm in the Bay Area. If you need a Linux/VMware sysadmin and you're either in San Francisco or the East Bay, reply here.

      Don't know if you've noticed or not, but the cost of a college education becoming more and more outside the ability of middle class people to afford. With the government cutting back education funding because they can't raise revenues with businesses complaining about taxation, you can't seem to find Americans who can do the work. There's a direct correlation between the lack of domestic workers and the lack of education funding.

      I couldn't begin to afford a college education today if I were of that age.

    3. Re:You guys aren't in the Bay Area by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      Bay Area
      Serious Money
      130k++

      one of these does not belong

  36. Most of what's wrong... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    Most of what is wrong with H1B could be fixed if the politicians actions matched their rhetoric ...

    Most of what is wrong with everything the government touches could be fixed if the politicians actions matched their rhetoric.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  37. Give them citizenship instead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Instead of having temporary work visas, allow more immigrants in general and get rid of the H1B program entirely.

  38. Tech / IT needs some kind of apprenticeship system by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    Tech / IT needs some kind of apprenticeship system with real skills and not just college book skills.

  39. Don't worry, there's still the L-1 by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

    There's even more fraud in the L1 program than the H1B. All you need is a phony business card that says "Manager" on it.

  40. Re:Tech / IT needs some kind of apprenticeship sys by catherder_finleyd · · Score: 1

    The University of Cincinnati Engineering College and several other Engineering Colleges have, for the last century, used the Co-Op model. In this system, students alternate school terms with work at companies. It is generally paid, and is in the student's area of study. It is fairly common in Engineering schools, especially in the Midwest USA.

  41. Australian and E-3 visa by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 2

    What's the best way to find a job in the US as an Australian Citizen and using the E-3 visa?

    The E-3 visa is like H1-B but better and has a seperate 10.5k cap and is only available to Australian Citizens.

    I find many employers don't know what an E-3 visa is (as they only do H1-B) and don't bother, nevermind the fact that getting an Aussie on E-3 visa is much easier and cheaper (its free, in fact) compared to the hassle of H1-B...

    Any tips, information, etc, would be greatly appreciated.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
    1. Re:Australian and E-3 visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on an E-3 visa. All the big-tech companies (Google, Amazon, Microsoft ) know about it, and deal with it. It's not free btw, a couple hundred dollars if I remember. Super easy to get. Also, keep mind it's for a specific employer, you can't transfer without needing to leave the country and rego through the process

    2. Re:Australian and E-3 visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another Aussie on an E-3. Amazon defn know about the E-3, find jobs here: http://www.amazon.com/Search-Jobs-Careers/b?ie=UTF8&node=239362011 and http://aws.amazon.com/careers/

      They do hiring trips in Sydney every year. If you get to the interview stage read EVERYTHING in the emails you get sent. Read a book like 'Cracking the Code Interview' http://amzn.com/098478280X. If your algorithms knowledge is rusty expect to spend a few weeknights + weekends studying. If you are successful your relocation + visa costs are covered.

    3. Re:Australian and E-3 visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an E3. Best bet is to find a small consulting company to sponsor the visa. Large companies are usually too inflexible with HR that is not easy to work with.

    4. Re:Australian and E-3 visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm here on an E3 visa working for a US University as a Software Developer.

      Just apply for the job, and tell them it's like employing a canadian on a TN visa (similar conditions)

      Worked for me.

    5. Re:Australian and E-3 visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Put a red dot on your head and colour your skin black.

    6. Re:Australian and E-3 visa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your white non indian your not part of the organized effort, don't confuse us with facts

  42. Techies need to organize by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Note: I did not say unionize. Doctors are organized though the AMA. Lawyers are organized.

    Of course big companies are going to screw the techies, why they shouldn't they? They have all the power, and techies are busy back-stabbing each other.

    1. Re:Techies need to organize by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Because politics suck and I already get paid more than my doctor and lawyer friends that are my same age. Also, while I do have to work hard sometimes, most of the time I work 40 hours at my current job and they have a very reasonable pace. My doctor and lawyer friends work all kinds of weird hours and are on call constantly for their much lower pay.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    2. Re:Techies need to organize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are too stupid only the Indians organize
      Americans are brain washed especially tech people, they don't realize they're wages will go down

  43. Re:H1Bs are coding, Americans are trolling by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    Fact: most H1Bs are entry level.

  44. Calls it as I sees it by russbutton · · Score: 1

    So the government is cutting back and cutting back on education funding. Then American companies complain they can't find enough Americans to do the work, at a time when there is still massive unemployment. So naturally they have to import workers from over-seas to take those jobs that Americans can't seem to fill.. Doesn't this just make you PROUD to be an American?!

  45. Email senator and congressman NOW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you called your senator or congressman? Are you aware that large groups of people who have received green cards as a result of their own H1b work have organized and set up petitions to open the floodgates for their compatriots? There is little purpose to posting here - you need to call/write/email the people who rely on your vote. Make sure your voice is heard!!!!!

  46. The First World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "I can't find a job that pays me more than $50k a year."

    Seriously? There's a guy out there willing to do the same work you do but for less. Of course I would try to hire that guy; I'd be stupid not to. That's how the market works.

    I am a high school senior. I'm going to a pretty good university next year in a CS honors program. Would I like to come out four years later and land a $100k job? Sure. Does that mean I feel entitled to a $100k job? Of course not. My parents were H1 immigrants who have since gotten Green cards. My mom has a BS in EE and 15+ years of job experience. She makes around $50k. We're not rich, but we live decently. Why some people seem to think that they are entitled to making X amount more than market prices and then whine when they don't get it baffles me.

    1. Re:The First World by BonThomme · · Score: 1

      "I am a high school senior."

      You may not have achieved wisdom yet.

    2. Re:The First World by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Really? Cause it sounds like he has more wisdom than all the whiners on here. He'll get out of school and settle for the 30K job at the bad company while living at home and getting experience. Then he'll have the "3-5 years experience" and be getting the 50K job that you refuse to take. After that, he'll get the 80K job and then the senior position at 120K while you're still sitting at home whining that you can't live on a 50K job.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  47. Re:Make US collgle free or much lower cost with lo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or you could just peg the amount of tuition owed to job outcomes so colleges weren't legally allowed to charge $100k for a sociology degree.

  48. Re:CS is not IT and stuff like subnetting is tech by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Bingo. Nail on the head. If most "tech industry" people who are railing against H-1B visa's are CS majors, then it is no wonder they can't find a job.

    Not many employers are actually looking for CS majors. They don't need or want somebody to do research on the next big thing or somebody to have on their payroll to create tech ideas when the function of that business isn't technology related. What they want is that when they have a specific business need, they have somebody on the payroll who can implement and maintain that business need. When we need a bigger compute cluster with a larger SAN and perhaps to expand our network, a CS major is a poor choice for that job because of what you just told me. He can't subnet so he has no business touching their information infrastructure.

    Most businesses who have a technology need are NOT in the business of the theoretical realm, so it's only natural that they won't hire people to do that.

    http://www.ted.com/talks/mike_rowe_celebrates_dirty_jobs.html

    That's why you're losing your job to foreigners.

    --
    Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  49. Re:Lower your salary by Billly+Gates · · Score: 2

    I have been in your boat my friend and this is not an attempt at a flamebait.

    I accepted near poverty wages as no one would talk to me when I demanded $20 an hour! Then I lowered to $18/hr. Got 1 interview. Lowered it to $15/hr got 6 interviews! Then putting my head to shame I went as low as $13/hr. Bang! Got hired!

    You are not worth $70,000 a year. If you were you would not have typed this and would be working right? So you went to school and had no jump? Welcome to the fucking real world my friend where 40% do not get jobs in their field.

    So work 2 jobs. Go wait tables? Go sell shit at Best Buy when you are not making $13 an hour. Money with degrees only make $13/hr or $26,000 a year starting out?! No you did not misread that. Sorry buddy but, without experience no one is going to talk to you.

    Go work, get your references, join a temp agency so you can maximize the amount of references you obtain so you can make that $70,000 some day. My brother makes $130,000 a year and has an MBA. How much did he make as a young kid fresh out of school at the same company? Only $50,000 as a systems analysis excel jockey. He had to earn that.

    Whining about Indians and H1b1s folks will not change the situation. You have to be worth that $70,000 in an ROI and out of school you wont get that. It takes years. Sorry slashdotters but that is the hard truth and why the corps are really whining about qualified workers. Not wages, but for $70,000 a year you should as hell have many years experience.

    So get to work gaining them. Other slashdotters reading this who make $70,0000 will repeat what I am saying.

  50. H-1B workers don't always make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It actually costs a company more money to hire a foreign worker than a U.S. worker. You have over $2000 in USCIS filing fees. If a company doesn't do the work in-house it cost at least another $2000 in attorney fees. If the qualified U.S. workers were out there we would be hiring them. Another thing to bust your conspiracy theory, we must by law pay a foreign worker Prevailing Wage so they are being paid fairly (compared to people in the same role in the particular geographic region - down to the county). We by law have to pay PW to these workers, but we don't have to pay PW to U.S. workers. So tell me again, is it really cheaper? And a lot of these people end up applying for a green card. So they all are not coming here, learning and going home. They are paying taxes and contributing to the economy. I am a citizen, and am tired of people that don't know that facts whining about this. I hear all the time if a USC has these skills send them over.

    1. Re:H-1B workers don't always make less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, so you think $4K is going to be a big deal and make it more expensive on a position that'd normally be $80k when they offer $50-60k to the H1B visa recipient, so that they'll contemplate a local candidate.

      You might want to bone back up on your math there, bucko...it's pretty damned skewed...

    2. Re:H-1B workers don't always make less by russotto · · Score: 1

      The math works out in favor of the H-1B candidate, even if you assume identical salaries. There are high fixed costs to acquiring and bringing up to speed a new employee. Employee tenure averages about 2 years, because the fastest way to advance in tech is to jump ship to a company with a better offer.

      An H-1B visaholder finds it much harder to do that, and is stuck for 3-6 years, or even longer if they're trying to get a green card (while you can sometimes change H-1B sponsors, doing so restarts the green card process). Which means less turnover and much lower fixed costs.

      Furthermore, the employer can offer much less in the way of raises and possibilities for advancement -- which feeds the cycle of his non-indentured employees jumping ship.

  51. They took my job! by peppepz · · Score: 1
    Usually, when I read /., I find a lot of people praising unbounded capitalism, the invisible hand, criticising unions because they've destroyed Detroit / they keep bad teachers from being fired / they forced Apple to resort to sweatshops in China.

    But when it's turn for the invisible hand to slap the kind of people who usually post here, the comments have a much different tone and the proposals push in another direction.

    How did that Google guy say? Perhaps we'd better start running, for the robots have already started.

    1. Re:They took my job! by majid_aldo · · Score: 1

      it's nauseating how one of the smartest demographics on the web degenerate into 'they take our jobs' types on this matter. required reading http://business.time.com/2013/01/30/the-economics-of-immigration-who-wins-who-loses-and-why/

      this is one slashdot discussion that i wont benefit from!

      --
      --- widget evolution: enhanced, plus, super, ultra, extreme, exxxtreme, ultra-extreme, ..etc.
    2. Re:They took my job! by professionalfurryele · · Score: 1

      H1b isn't immigration, it is indentured servitude. You want to take the H1b program and replace it by giving more green cards to skilled individuals we can talk.

    3. Re:They took my job! by russotto · · Score: 1

      Usually, when I read /., I find a lot of people praising unbounded capitalism, the invisible hand, criticising unions because they've destroyed Detroit / they keep bad teachers from being fired / they forced Apple to resort to sweatshops in China. But when it's turn for the invisible hand to slap the kind of people who usually post here, the comments have a much different tone and the proposals push in another direction.

      The H-1B visa is not the "invisible hand" of "unbounded capitalism". It's a device of the rather visible hand of government intended to reduce the salaries of skilled workers. Don't believe me? Sounds paranoid? Here's Alan Greenspan's testimony on the issue.

      The second bonus would address the increasing concentration of income in this country. Greatly expanding our quotas for the highly skilled would lower wage premiums of skilled over lesser skilled. Skill shortages in America exist because we are shielding our skilled labor force from world competition. Quotas have been substituted for the wage pricing mechanism. In the process, we have created a privileged elite whose incomes are being supported at noncompetitively high levels by immigration quotas on skilled professionals. Eliminating such restrictions would reduce at least some of our income inequality.

      Yeah, Alan, it's skilled workers who are the "privileged elite"... not those who own the companies who are paying them. Pull the other one, it's got bells on.

    4. Re:They took my job! by peppepz · · Score: 1
      And what's the difference? They're words of the very same kind that we use to hear when, say, trade agreements put blue collars to compete against slaves in developing countries, effectively forcing them to accept the same working conditions or, more realistically, lose their jobs.

      I do believe that competition is good and that its absence leads to disaster. However, after competition has done its thing, people must be able to find a job allowing them to live with dignity: if that doesn't happen, then something's wrong. In the case of skilled workers, “dignity” includes getting back what they've spent to build their competences.

      What I wanted to deprecate with my post is the attitude of people who happen to be more or less shielded from the ugly head of competition and then shrug, or even pontificate, in front of the misfortune of those who don't share the same privilege.

    5. Re:They took my job! by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      I think that's a reasonable attitude that is not shared by a large proportion (measured by vocality) of the Slashdotters who oppose the H1B program.

  52. Re:Lower your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Then putting my head to shame I went as low as $13/hr. Bang! Got hired!

    Dude, I was making $13 an hour 12 years ago doing fucking data entry!

    You're right about not being worth $70k a year these days. It's a brutal market, an employer's market. The wages are in a race to the bottom. The only debate here is the reason why - and I can tell you it's NOT because of anything domestic IT workers did!

  53. Re:Lower your salary by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    > Then putting my head to shame I went as low as $13/hr. Bang! Got hired!

    Dude, I was making $13 an hour 12 years ago doing fucking data entry!

    You're right about not being worth $70k a year these days. It's a brutal market, an employer's market. The wages are in a race to the bottom. The only debate here is the reason why - and I can tell you it's NOT because of anything domestic IT workers did!

    It beats working at McDonalds. There is no time to debate if you are down on your luck. Only time to work and many making $13/hr is the new norm. You are right it is not 12 years ago. 12 years ago was not the norm either remember? It does not take a genius to type shit in a computer. That can be done for minimum wage.

    So we have one extreme down today and 12 years ago we had the opposite extreme, where the real value should be in the middle if logic serves. I think it is the economy, health care costs, taxes, lawyers being sue happy, and H1B1 are a tiny part of it. No one wants to be poor but if your competition is happy to live at that wage you need to match it.

    It is true employers can not find qualified people who are experts and the wages keep going up for that. So if you start low in time it will go up much faster than 12 years ago.

  54. PhD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A PhD just means you stayed in school rather than working. If you spent all that time in school pursuing something worthwhile you'd have your own company on the other end of a BS. The reason than we have a backlash against degrees is that they have become systemic. All it takes to get them is stamina to survive the system.

  55. Nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you want is someone who understands and can do subnetting by rote since highschool when they worked in a NOC and Tech Support as a Level 1 tech and got their CCNA. THEN they went to the uni and got a CS or engineering degree.

  56. Good. by malv · · Score: 1

    Not even enough jobs for Americans. Now if only our government would stop the flow of illegals from Mexico.

    Are we seriously expected to employ the world? Make something in your country.

  57. Preferred vendor's lists by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    You forgot a very important part of the equation. Preferred vendor’s lists to keep out talented independent small shops. You, Jane Blow, cannot work on a project unless your pimp represents you to the client. You might be the sexist girl doing the hottest shit in town, but if you want to preform, you got to pay Guido.

  58. while I agree with your general idea... by Chirs · · Score: 1

    Anyone with a comp sci degree that doesn't know about subnetting isn't interested in computers.

    1. Re:while I agree with your general idea... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      I know about subnetting but I didn't lean it in college. Can I "do" subnetting? Absolutely, just need a couple of minutes with the owner's manual of the particular hardware and failing that, google.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    2. Re:while I agree with your general idea... by Svartalf · · Score: 1

      This entirely depends on whether the curriculum covered IP networking and whether they were motivated to learn it if it wasn't. I know I didn't care all that much about subnetting and the like until I went to go set up my first IP network of Linux and Windows machines some two and a half decades ago.

      Not all CompSci revolves around network engineering. Most of it covers things like algorithms- which is probably the way it should be because it's not the same thing as computer or network engineering though those disciplines are interrelated.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    3. Re:while I agree with your general idea... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      This is why I mention IT specifically. IT is in by far higher demand than CS. IT being information technology. The word information being the key. The most important part of managing information is a network. How are you supposed to understand networks if you can't subnet?

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    4. Re:while I agree with your general idea... by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Personally I can subnet in my head. Give me the number of networks you want and how many devices on each network, what you might plan on expanding to, and other figures like that, and I'll have you a full network diagram in under a minute (depending of course on the scale.) Further than that, give me security rules, VLAN requirements, and other specifics and I'll type you out a full configuration set within a few minutes. Said configuration could be pasted straight away into a RS232 terminal to a cisco device. With a few tweaks, it can also be pasted into an HP, brocade, or juniper device. (Yep, they made their OS syntax very similar to cisco for that very reason.) Probably more vendors as well, though these are the only ones I'm familiar with.

      I can also implement high availability through e.g. virtualization, standby routing, etc.

      This is what employers want. They don't want to hire a CS major only to have to pay him for a few months while he reads books and catches up, meanwhile he doubtless has no actual experience with real equipment. CS majors understand theory, but not applying it. IT majors understand applying it and they know just enough theory to do the job - they can pick up the extras on the job with no negative impact to their employer. By going to trade schools, IT majors actually have experience with real equipment, even if no actual job experience, which makes them more desirable.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
  59. Re:CS is not IT and stuff like subnetting is tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I posted this AC as I have some mod points. We (U.S.A.) have a LOT of highschool seniors and college undergrads that are fully capable of the task of L1 support with adult supervision (to keep them from yanking failed RAID SAS drives from an array willynilly). They "grok" what they do, but need a mentor to guide them.

    Or you can hire a 20 something H1B that has a specific training to provide L1 nosupport. That array will lose its data but they'll give the customer a 1-800 number to scream at.

    I do the management of USA/MEX/BRAZ/CAN/Euro IT children, and I really don't see the appeal of hiring the product of the racist monoculture of the eastern counties.

  60. You can't outsource that by Molochi · · Score: 1
    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  61. just LOVE ur topic,smartass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you topic author. Bet ur job got taken by a h 1b alien. only reason were called alien is cauw of our extraordinary abilities

  62. On the other hand. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have 20 years of IP, built up designing specialist real world test instrumentation. An American company has offered to buy me out, in a deal where I get a senior position (VP, research) delivering that IP into their new products until I retire in another 20 years or so. There is no way I can get a visa for a year. Is this what the system should do ?

  63. Lacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talent pool lacking Easy fix: Lower your standards.

  64. Time to face facts. by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    As long as there are people willing to work for less pay and under worse conditions that you, they will have a job and you won't. That is exactly what the corporations who run this country want. They have been systematically turning the US into a 3rd-world country with the ultimate goal of getting a working wage here down to a level that is comparable to a working wage in China, India, or Viet Nam. Once you've been stripped of pay (there's still along way to go), benefits (how does your healthcare compare to other countries?), and security (that was the first thing that went), they'll get rid of OSHA.

    My advice? Either start your own business or suck it up- the ride down has only just begun.

  65. We don't need them by whizbang77045 · · Score: 2

    We don't need any more foreign nationals for any reason, including H-1B. We have too many people out of work, and the conditions which prevailed in this country when we needed immigrants no longer exist. Potential immigrants need to focus on solving the problems in their own country, including unemployment, and quit trying to migrate to a fairy tail kingdom where all their problems will be solved.

    1. Re:We don't need them by servognome · · Score: 1

      We have too many out of work people who don't have the right skill set. The unemployment rate for engineers and scientists hit a peak around 5%, which is what the general economy sees in the best times.
      There truly is a shortage of well educated science and engineers, unfortunately, what the big companies are doing is taking this data to cry "foul" and using H1Bs to hire technicians and technical tradesmen (who are suffering severely) to lower their costs. By hiring cheaper, less qualified individuals in those areas, instead of filling in the vacancies that truly need it, the corporations can claim to be in a perpetual state of labor shortage destroying the American middle class.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:We don't need them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are trying to fix the problems in their own countries by redistributing a tiny portion of the wealth the US has been hording.

  66. You're an individual instance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of rapidly progressing global economic restructuring, which includes a race to the bottom for paid workers. You're among the majority of capable workers whose real incomes (if they have jobs) are in decline, while the incomes of high level executives in the companies who employ workers are on a rapid rise.

    Increasing income and wealth concentration, taxation of earned income rather than wealth, regulatory capture...things are getting rapidly worse everywhere for the large proportion of us who have to earn our living. Meantime, the wealth-concentrated folks at the top continue their "invest->borrow against investment income->die & transfer assets at stepped-up basis" mode of living that amplifies wealth disparity still more.

    You're right to be angry about this situation, and your understanding of how people become revolutionaries is on point.

  67. You live in Europe by rsilvergun · · Score: 0

    which is largely socialist. A 'real' capitalist economy and a free market handles it just fine. Everyone's wages plummet, we're all short on food and we start working 80 hours a week to get by. That's what a 'real' capitalist economy does. A rising tide doesn't raise all boats, it sinks all but the largest.

    Also, you're political anti-union tripe doesn't match with your typing accent. I see that crap in England because we more or less bought them, but not in the rest of Europe. I really hope you're just an astroturfer and you're not actually believing the non-sense you spout. READ a little about the history of Unions in American and how things were before them, or just look at how those Chinese workers are treated right _now_. You're nuts if you're attacking unions. Or an astro turfer.

    Like I said, here's hoping you're an Astroturfer, because you owe everything you have to unions and socialism. Pisses me off to see ppl like that turning against it.Arrogant bunch of...

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  68. Lies by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    just lies. There's plenty of Qualified Americans. I can't compete with India. They come here alone, work, and can support their whole family by sending a fraction of their wages back. Meanwhile my kid's school cloths will run $600+ this year and that's if I send her to Walmart and have her pick out the cheap stuff. Triple that if I shop somewhere she wont' get bullied for.

    As for qualified Americans, I've seen what the H1-Bs do. They're ever loving code monkeys. You will never, ever, ever trick me into believing there's a shortage of VB programmers. What you've got a shortage of is people you can abuse that can take the abuse and bang out your crap.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  69. He IS worth $70k a year by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    And so are you. And so is EVERY American. Stop thinking that way. When you do, they win. They being the 1%.
    br> You're worth a decent wage. You're entitle to food, shelter and Health care. You EARNED a good life just by being BORN. Pull you're head out of your rear and stop beating up on yourself just because your daddy wasn't board rich. Bill Gates, Mark Zuck, Dick Cheney. Every last one had wealthy parents and connections. Not a damn one of them got anywhere near a boot strap. Lies, all lies.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:He IS worth $70k a year by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Dick Cheney flunked out of Harvard and made a few bucks above minimum wage in his late 20s fixing freaking telephone polls.

      Just because you were born rich doesn't mean you stay rich. Every rich person needed to prove him or herself. I can tell this is a troll because no one should earn just by being born.

    2. Re:He IS worth $70k a year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I cannot tell if this person is being sarcastic or serious. I guess it is similar to how people say it is impossible to tell the different between a religious zealot and someone who is mocking them.

      Every American is worth $70k per year?
      Every American "earned" a "good life' just by being born?

      If every adult in the U.S. was worth at least $70k per year in salary then the GDP would have to be at least $22 trillion (I added some for health care costs, payroll taxes, etc.). And that is only if no one is worth more than $70k per year. That is simply ridiculous.

  70. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You guys making $70K or $50K or... $80K? are complaining about H1-B workers getting your jobs?

    Please... At least have the decency to hide your salary numbers.

  71. Are those complaining workers really qualified? by rjha94 · · Score: 0

    I am from India and I have worked with American companies in the past, though not in an outsourcing kind of situation. While I understand

    + the anger (I would be too if jobs from here were shifted to Timbaktu for example)
    + and I understand the under-the-table tactics of Indian outsourcing companies operating in India,

    I would like to add my 0.02$ to the debate. First, I have never seen expert jobs being outsourced. Most of the companies I know of, talk about outsourcing un-important parts, something that is not critical to business. Expert jobs are not outsourced, product management is not outsourced, sales jobs are not outsourced. Fact is, If you are working for one of these companies in India, you have a clear sense that you are no-where near decision centers. So important things are still in US, even for technology companies. The very fact that the management is ready to go to a lower bidder underlines the fact that the pieces are not important. The counterparts I knew and respected for skill are still employed and much in demand.

    Second, all such debated necessarily assume that people who instead of US folks finally get to do these jobs are morons. That is a naive assumption. Maybe these jobs were actually low skill jobs to begin with or lot of people in US were living under a false assumption that they were "doing technology". I know enough morons working in US offices who should have been fired a long ago. The only advantage these people had that they were born in a good place and nothing else. It would be nice if someone could present an alternate version of this story as well. If nothing then just to balance the debate a little bit.

    --
    No .sig
  72. Free labour movement now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is time to get rid of this "visa" business and allow free labour movement between USA and Canada, similar to what currently exists in Europe or between Australia and New Zealand. There are too many restrictions on the "TN" (NAFTA) visa which make it hard for IT professionals to use it. Also good high tech jobs are *severely* lacking in the Greater Toronto Area (where I live) and elsewhere in Canada.

  73. Re:Are those complaining workers really qualified? by qaz123 · · Score: 1

    >>> The only advantage these people had that they were born in a good place and nothing else

    Is this not enough? You know a country is for its own citizens in the first place, not for everyone in the world.

  74. AWW! DAMN! Looks like... by Stubbyfingers · · Score: 1

    You're going to have to hire Americans and pay them more than Starbux employees!

    Maybe next year you can reel in a few H1-B's on the CHEAP! But you gotta be FASTER!

  75. Ebay = monster.com by yenic · · Score: 1

    If there's a shortage of H-1B visas (meaning there are times you can't obtain one no matter how much you're willing to pay), they should be put up for auction and sold to the highest bidder so everyone who wants one badly enough can get one. It's irresponsible of the government not to look for ways to reduce our tax burden.

    When you say Ebay, I think you mean checking the domestic workforce.. and "bidding out the job" to the qualified applicant. Unfortunately, that's not an option because the purpose to H1B visas is to drop wages, not bid them up.

    --
    http://www.accountkiller.com/en/delete-slashdot-account Stop visiting Slashdot.
  76. And here is Ron's outstanding article on this subj by sgt_doom · · Score: 1
  77. Thank you by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

    Whenever one bothers to study individual cases (first I studied regarding tech was the replacement of Palm developers with H-1Bs from India) is that non-vetted personnel invariably replace highly vetted American personnel. End of story.

  78. Horse has long fled that barn... by ZeroPly · · Score: 1

    I have at least three friends who are in their forties and early fifties and in the same boat as you. Back when all the manufacturing jobs were leaving the country, all of them had the arrogance to say "those are useless jobs. If someone in China can do them, let them. We need to focus on the high tech jobs, not on ones assembling toasters".

    Then with the relentless push of free trade by the idiots running our country, the departing jobs became more and more high skilled. The cheap labor conservatives kept chanting the mantra that globalization would somehow replace all the boring jobs with exciting new super-duper ones.

    Fast forward a decade or so. Today, one of my friends who used to be a C++ programmer makes wood furniture rather than jump though a new hoop every year and learn the newest "Ruby on rails with a twist of Hadoop and NOSQL" trend that will become useless information in five years. One has a master's in CS and 20 years of experience and works on a helpdesk. And in the last five years, to every single employer that has told me "there's no one skilled for this position", I have asked "would you be able to find someone if you paid triple the salary you are offering?". And of course they don't want to think about that or answer it.

    It comes down to arrogance, plain and simple. Programmers wanted to be considered professionals like doctors and lawyers, so they never supported unionization. But they completely overestimated the amount of training it takes to become a programmer or similar tech guy, when compared to a nephrologist or civil engineer. The people whose jobs are being eaten by the H-1B visas need to start getting front and center in this discussion. Every time a CEO says "no talent available", there needs to be about 50 people with signs outside the venue calling him a greedy fuck, and condemning cheap labor conservatism. That is the only way things will change. Posting here does nothing, because the general public believes that there just aren't enough programmers in the US to write the code.

    --
    Support microSD: in a post 9/11 world, it is unwise to carry your data on media that you cannot comfortably swallow.
    1. Re:Horse has long fled that barn... by Alioth · · Score: 1

      Today, one of my friends who used to be a C++ programmer makes wood furniture rather than jump though a new hoop every year and learn the newest "Ruby on rails with a twist of Hadoop and NOSQL"

      And he made the right decision - if you are not prepared to be constantly learning in a software development job, then you aren't cut out for software development. Never in the history of software development has the expectation of never learning a new skill and doing the same stuff every day been correct. If you want to be in software dev or just IT in general, you must enjoy learning and you must continuously be learning. If you don't enjoy learning, then do something else.

    2. Re:Horse has long fled that barn... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's like being a mechanic and going into work on Monday: "Oh no. They re-invented the wheel AGAIN?"

      "Yep, and the old metric units are out. Now we're measuring everything in swoozles."

  79. Question from potential imigrant: what is H-1B? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been recently offered a change in scenery and a chance to work either in Japan (Tokio) or US (Atlanta). Work would entail some programming and some tech support most likely. Am I to understand that since the the visa cap is reached the USA is off the table? Or is the H-1B specifically for US companies? Wikipedia tells me that H-1B requires equal of bachelors degree and I'm not sure I would qualify since I haven't actually graduated. What kind of other visas are there if one would go to work for a foreign company in the US?

  80. and ban forced room and board by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    and ban forced room and board that can end costing you much then renting on your own.

  81. GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Now reduce the cap.

  82. Re:Lower your salary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or, level the playing field so we can compete again. What you don't seem to get is that the competition is unfair right now. That's not an accident.

  83. But what about other Non-India countries? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    First I think H-1B visa program should be renamed to: WTIC Non-Imigrant Visa (WTIC stands for Wipro, Tata, Infosys and Cognizant).

    Renaming visa program to WTIC will save a LOT of time and effort to people like me (13+ years experience, expert in many software development areas) but
    unfortunately from very small country.
    Being expert from small country is disability in the process of searching for WTIC visa because of following:

    1. You are not going to work for salary of 50k/year in WTIC
    2. You are not Indian, WTIC visa are meant to be for Indian people
    3. I had two great offers (110k/y) from Bloomberg and from Amazon(prime), but unfortunately too late, WTIC visas are taken in first few days by...WTIC, more luck after ONE year.

    No company looking to fulfill some position would wait for whole year, there will be two options:
    - Employ an US citizen (good option) or
    - Employ a WTIC person (much probable option) because every time in larger enterprises on some positions are sitting "smart" low level managers with "bright ideas" how to bring more profit to stock holders by cutting costs (of salaries) by at least 30% by employing rookies from WTIC .

    While in theory H-1B looks nice, in reality, small US company with few employees looking for real expert from anywhere (even from other country) ready to pay a competitive salary, simply doesn't have energy, effort and willingness to compete with WTIC body shops for WTIC visas.

    I know WTIC are service companies, companies not delivering IT products (software, hardware etc...), but as far as I can see, from services, they are only delivering unemployment of US citizens and delivering US dollars in India, directly to WTIC stockholders.

    To summarize: WTIC means "less jobs for US citizens and more US dollars out-flowing to India to WTIC stock holders"

  84. Stop the increase!! Call congress!! by POed+Lib · · Score: 1

    If you oppose the scab H-1B increase, get OFF this board and call your senators and house member, call Durbin, Sanders, and Grassley and tell them NO MORE SCAB H-1Bs.

  85. From an old thread. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat lot of good this does when the poor guy is already out of school.

    Besides, how do you know that he didn't listen to a guy just like you?

    From an old thread ...

    I'm the guy the posted that rant. You sir are right about everything.

    I did listen to folks like that and I read comments here on how to dig out of my mess: hence my MBA. I'm not trying to gather sympathy or anything - I just want to work again. Nothing more. Trying to switch professions from IT makes people really wary - "Why do you want to leave such a lucrative career?!" They don't believe ANY explanation. And back to square one.

    I do research. Common advice for someone like me is to develop apps for iOS or Android. From what I see now (2013) no one is making a living at it unless they have a job - W2 job in the States - developing apps.

    I'm posting this to you because I really appreciate ANY support. I'm so sad and desperate.

    All I can say is "Thank you."

    It's nice to know that there are folks who can empathize.

  86. H-1B cap is apparently over 129K by NickGnome · · Score: 1
    The US State Department says that they issue well over 100K H-1B visas through consular offices each year, and that additional thousands are granted H-1B status via other processes.
    ...

    year numbers issued through consular offices
    2005: 124,099
    2006: 135,421
    2007: 154,053
    2008: 129,464
    2009: 110,367
    2010: 117,409
    2011: 129,134

    All this blather about 65K or 85K is sand and dust thrown in your faces... especially considering that even a 65K cap would be abou 64K too many to bring in only the genuinely "best" or "brightest", "highly-skilled" rather than the reality that over 100K additional new H-1B visas are given out each year to cheap, young, pliant foreign labor with flexible ethics and with no standards for skill level.

  87. Re:bodyshops, by NickGnome · · Score: 1
    "Nope, not my "local company". Mostly it's the big guys that ARE NOT on the H1-B Top List: Microsoft, Google, IBM, others..."
    ...

    yah, sure, but, e.g. MSFT and Ill-Begotten Monstrosities, employ thousands in Red China to do things that used to be done in the USA. One of IBM's biggest divisions is "Global Services". They also both contract with other cross-border bodyshoppers.

    And let us not forget the tens of thousands of L visas and J visas and F visas with OPT and CPT.

    Then there's the professional ethics issue. The 3 firms you mention have done such shoddy work in the past, engaged in so many scams, the they should have to pay a sizable premium/strong to get people to deign to work with them.

  88. Re: millions of Amerians with STEM degrees by NickGnome · · Score: 1
    "'most Americans' never went to Engineering school in the first place. ever."
    ...

    You are correct. It would have been ridiculous to expect that "most" would be interested in doing so.

    OTOH, from 1970 to 2010, 6,107,360 US citizens earned STEM degrees and some 12M learned STEM skills by all means. From 2000 to 2010, 3,006,100 US citizens earned STEM degrees.

    According to congressional testimony from Michael Teitelbaum, and research reports by Hal Salzman and B. Lindsay Lowell (repeated research done separately and together), we've been turning out about 3 times as many capable, degreed, US citizen STEM professionals as have landed STEM jobs over the last couple decades.

    Thus it is interesting that though there was an 400K excess of STEM workers in India in 1990 (per Gurcharan Das) which generated a sequence of international lobbying by their government and business executives since, there has been not a peep about the millions of surplussed US citizen STEM workers, though their existence is documented in the government statistics if you know where to dig, and in a few obscure research reports posted but not ballyhooed in the media.

  89. Re: Remove the H-1B by NickGnome · · Score: 1

    Remove the H-1B, limit the L (to 6 months and e.g. 10K per year). Apply some standards to O visas (instead of giving them out the sleazy porn "actresses").

  90. Re: cheap, young pliant labor and bodyshops by NickGnome · · Score: 1
    "its absolutely baseless to claim that outsourcing firms bring cheaper workers on H1-B visa to work in US... when an employer files H1-B petition for a potential employee, the employer promises to pay more than the amount recommended BY LAW."
    ...

    Yah, sure. He's required to pay the "prevailing wage", which is considerably below the actual local market compensation when intelligence, degrees, certificates, experience, the specific job, etc., are taken into account.

    US DoL uses 4 levels for determining the "prevailing wage", and the vast majority of H-1B recipients are, miracle of miracles, classified in the bottom, newbies, apprentices, inexperienced, generally unable to solve problems on their own. And the pay more or less matches that evaluation, not the much bandied about claims in the media that H-1B recipients are "the best and brightest" or "highly-skilled".

    Compensation of H-1B grantees has been studied quite a bit. Vandrevala of Tata claimed that they're paid 25% to 35% below local US compensation. One study concluded that they're paid about 12% below US compensation. A study of the best of the best H-1Bs sponsored for green cards concluded that this tiny sub-set were paid 1.0001 times the local median (i.e. one ten-thousandth more) as I recall, rather than the 2 to 3 times median that would be expected for someone exceptionally bright, knowledgeable, creative, etc.

    There have been at least another half dozen such studies which reached similar conclusions.

    An especially interesting series of articles in the Portland Maine papers disclosed that it was common practice to declare that H-1B workers would be living and working in low cost of living/low pay locales, and keeping a mail drop or closet office for mail forwarding, paying them at the level appropriate for the mail drop's location, and having them work in expensive/high pay locations like Manhattan and Washington DC, instead. There was some token effort to discourage such scams after the series was publicized, but whether it has continued I know not.

    The point is that "prevailing wage" is a legalistic term of art which seems to mean one thing (what the words would mean as defined in Merriam-Webster's dictionaries, for instance) while meaning something completely different in practice. In this case, combined with difficulties of transferring from one sponsor to another (especially if the first sponsor is also sponsoring a green card application) keeps the guest-worker stuck with less mobility and less compensation and less ability to seek better working conditions, which is why the turn-coat IEEE and ACM are stabbing US STEM workers in the back by supporting replacement of or addition to H-1B visas with even more excessive numbers of green cards.

    The H-1B at least has the advantage of being a "temporary" visas, even if the term is awfully long -- 3 years initially, up to 3 years on renewal, and then year-by-year extensions after that only informally (not absolutely) limited to 2 or 3... while green cards would drive an ever increasing explosion of immigration and over-population and over-crowding.

  91. CS by alexo · · Score: 1

    I'd expect somebody in the computer field to tinker around with machines

    And herein lies the problem: CS is not "in the computer field", it is a branch of mathematics. The confusion stems from the unfortunate naming we use (in other languages it is more appropriately called something like "Computational Science" or "Informatics").
    Or, in the words of Michael R. Fellows, "Computer science is not about machines, in the same way that astronomy is not about telescopes. There is an essential unity of mathematics and computer science".

    A computer is a tool that a CS may use, not the subject of the field.

    That said, most CS undergrads set out to become programmers, "software developers" or suchlike. They may use the knowledge from the CS program but their focus will often be the computers, not the math. Therefore, to be well-rounded professionals in their field of work, they will need knowledge and experience from several areas of study -- both abstract and concrete.

    it's not like IRQs are windows 98 specific and are never used anymore.

    They are pretty much specific to the PC-compatible architecture.

    But that aside, such hardware-related topics are the domain of "Computer Engineering" field, a branch of EE.
    I am pretty sure that Donald Knuth, arguably the most influential "Computer Scientist" alive, has no idea about IRQs.

    I might not expect a biologist to be able to milk a cow, but they should at least have an idea where the milk comes from.

    That is because the source of milk is general knowledge known by every child over the age of 3.

    Heinlein's "Time Enough for Love" notwithstanding, math and science are getting more and more specialized. A molecular biologist, for example, doesn't even need to know what a cow is.

    But even if your analogy was valid, I bet that your "CS guy" knew what an interrupt is, but was not familiar with the specific implementation of the cascaded 8259A PICs used in the PC/AT architecture at the time.

    1. Re:CS by servognome · · Score: 1

      A computer is a tool that a CS may use, not the subject of the field.

      I agree, but a CS should have some understanding of the functions of their tools. As in your quote, "astronomy is not about telescopes" but one would expect an astronomer to have a basic understanding of the principles of telescopes, radar, etc. Even with modern technology where an astronomer is sitting at a machine and looking at the data produced by the telescope, he should still comprehend tool related causes of aberrations in his data.

      They are pretty much specific to the PC-compatible architecture.

      I'm not a CS, EE, or computer engineer, so I'm not completely knowledgeable about the subject, but I've worked with different systems that used ARM or embedded controllers that had to deal with interrupt requests.

      math and science are getting more and more specialized

      In my experience they are becoming more specialized, but paradoxically more interconnected. My degree is in Materials Engineering, but to accomplish my job I'd often have to learn skills from other disciplines like chemistry, programming, and statistics. Mathematicians can't just rely on pencil and paper, they need to understand computers to accomplish their goals more efficiently and effectively. And a molecular biologist probably has an interest in learning about cows if it displays certain preferable characteristics that they look to understand and mimic.

      But even if your analogy was valid, I bet that your "CS guy" knew what an interrupt is, but was not familiar with the specific implementation of the cascaded 8259A PICs used in the PC/AT architecture at the time.

      You're probably right, but if that is the case, the person should have enough understanding to take a methodical approach to solving the problem, not just shrug their shoulders.
      It shows the problem the original poster was talking about. Something that is relatively simple and widely used in the real world is ignored in formal academics.
      Personally, I think there should be more time allotted for apprenticeships in college. The semester I missed to take an 8-month internship greatly complimented all the information I learned in school.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    2. Re:CS by alexo · · Score: 1

      It shows the problem the original poster was talking about. Something that is relatively simple and widely used in the real world is ignored in formal academics.
      Personally, I think there should be more time allotted for apprenticeships in college. The semester I missed to take an 8-month internship greatly complimented all the information I learned in school.

      No, no, and a thousand times no!

      A university (some colleges included) is not a vocational school. Its job is to create researchers, not tradesmen -- there are other educational options for those wishing to go that route.

    3. Re:CS by servognome · · Score: 1

      Any scientist or engineer who will work in the real world should have an understanding of the tools of the field.
      The emphasis of universities should be primarily theoretical, but it is important to have some rudimentary equipment skills to apply that learning. That's why majors have hands on courses like instrumental analysis in chemistry, Math has applied use of modern computer and software tools , MCB - analysis of genome sequences for function using local and internet computer resources, Material Science has SEM/TEM, just to name a few.

      It's extremely difficult to find a job that is completely focused on theoretical studies. Their are vastly more industrial jobs than opportunities in academics. Most physics graduates don't do physics per se, but their coursework qualifies them to do jobs like computer simulation, data analysis, and logical problem solving. My friends who focused on experimental physics are project managers or run a research lab. Demonstrating one's ability to apply coursework towards solving issues is an important aspect of any technical field.
      In undergraduate studies, universities create problem solvers whose selected major provides them with slightly different specialized skills. Grad school provides more specialization in coursework, but again they need to develop cross-disciplinary competency to successfully conduct their research.

      Working to fix a SIMS tool problem doesn't mean you're engaging in vocational activities. You're a researcher trying to resolve issues so you can complete your experiment and get your paper finished on time.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    4. Re:CS by alexo · · Score: 1

      Time for a car analogy.

      Most drivers don't change their cars' oil on their own.

      There is a difference between knowing how to use a tool in the context of your job and how to fix it if it breaks.
      In the 2nd case, the tool becomes the focus and you're no longer acting in your primary capacity but rather in the capacity of a "tool fixer".

      Personal anecdote:
      I use the toilet every day. I also clean it and can, should the need arise, try to unclog it with a plunger or a "snake".
      However, when we replaced the toilets in our house, I decided that it is worthwhile to me to pay somebody to do it.

    5. Re:CS by servognome · · Score: 1

      The difference here, is that the job of the CS was to upgrade the oven software (add features, improve data analysis, communicate with new machines on the production line, etc) To use your car analogy, it's like the guy who is supposed to rice out your RX-7, doesn't know that adding under-glow neon incorrectly will prevent the headlights from turning on.

      Yes, there is a difference between tool fixers, and tool experts. Usually, it's more cost efficient and reliable to get a fixer to do a routine job. But there are times, especially when dealing with research and development, that the expert needs to have sufficient equipment knowledge to solve new problems. My major is materials engineering, but as a process engineer I made sure to learn a basic level of mechanics, CAD, electrical, and programming, because I would probably need to at some point use those skills, or sufficiently understand the problem to explain to management what kind of additional resources are needed to resolve the issue.

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
    6. Re:CS by alexo · · Score: 1

      The difference here, is that the job of the CS was to upgrade the oven software

      Then I humbly submit that you got the wrong person for the job.

      A degree in CS is supposed to give you a theoretical basis.
      The practical skills you mostly get elsewhere: other courses, books, self study, co-op, open-source contribution, etc.

      If you don't, well...

    7. Re:CS by servognome · · Score: 1

      Then I humbly submit that you got the wrong person for the job.

      The brilliance of HR. Hire people to do jobs you know nothing about beyond the buzzwords discussed in the last team building exercise.
      Surprised more baristas don't get employed as Java developers :P

      --
      D6 63 0D 70 89 81 BB 8E 7B 7C 5F 5D 54 EA AB 73
  92. Re:Lower your salary by TaxDoktor · · Score: 1

    One of the problems I see, is that the management types hiring the H1B people assume they are getting people at the same skill level, but statistically, the skill level is much worse, particularly from India. There were some studies on the quality of education awhile back, so I won't go into too much detail. But many of the H1B people lie or greatly exaggerate their eduction which in many cases is not provable. The management types are just happy their payouts are less, in reality they are getting garbage products and robbing jobs from truly qualified workers that could produce a quality product. (statistically, not always). The other problem besides ignorance from the accountant types hiring the H1B's thinking they are getting a deal, is that people seem to be more and more ok with putting out crap products. The days of true quality seem to be going away. Now it is just, get it out quick and fast and cheap. Innovation is just a buzz word no one wants to pay for any longer (for many companies, there are a couple still trying to compete doing it right)