Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft: Facebook Home Is a Copycat, Windows Phone Is the 'Real Thing'

colinneagle writes "Frank X. Shaw, VP of Corporate Communications at Microsoft, did not seem happy about Facebook's Home announcement when he wrote, 'I tuned into the coverage of the Facebook Home event yesterday and actually had to check my calendar a few times. Not to see if it was still April Fools Day, but to see if it was somehow still 2011. Because the content of the presentation was remarkably similar to the launch event we did for Windows Phone two years ago.' Shaw also posted Microsoft's 'Put people first with Windows Phone 7.5' video before writing, 'We understand why Facebook would want to find a way to bring similar functionality to a platform that is sadly lacking it.'"

199 comments

  1. Children, children... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's no need to fight, you BOTH suck.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Children, children... by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Funny

      Indeed. This seems more like a battle for a hill so small neither can stand on it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    2. Re:Children, children... by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 2

      I heard Eric Cartman demanding "Respect mah au-thor-tah!" in Shaw's complaint.

    3. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This was just a terrifically bad idea on Shaw's part. Desperately pleading that you did something first so you should get some attention is never going to win you sales or good PR. That said, it doesn't seem like Microsoft really has any other strategy (except perhaps for their video game market, where they bought their relevance.)

    4. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      King of the shrill?

    5. Re:Children, children... by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      Oh damn, I think I ruptured my spleen laughing.....

    6. Re:Children, children... by Grishnakh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Have you ever known Microsoft to do anything really intelligent to win good PR and sales? Every one of their marketing campaigns has been a complete debacle (remember the people running around in MSN butterfly outfits? Or the commercial for Microsoft SongSmith?). I don't know where MS gets their marketing people, but they're probably the worst in the Fortune 500.

    7. Re:Children, children... by rtb61 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No the Facebook product is quite different. You have to stop thinking of yourself as the typical user and think about the real typical user. I would be concerned for Facebook addicts and this device that makes addiction simpler, quite a few people are going to find themselves in serious psychological trouble. The unrealities of who and who are not really friends, competition in perceived social acceptance and distortion of self image, makes this device and the actual greed driven intent behind this device in it's application quite nasty. Designed from the get go to be psychologically addictive for those susceptible to it. Facebook have demonstrated how nasty they are and how aggressively they will target those vulnerable to their manipulations. To be clear I did go through that whole laborious process of deleting my account because it became apparent how privacy invasive they truly were and definitely not to be trusted.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    8. Re:Children, children... by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      And we hate both of them equally and for the same reasons: bad software, spying on users, and we're required to use them due to social or work obligations. Some of us need to use Windows for games, and some of our family members need to use Facebook for games.

    9. Re:Children, children... by roc97007 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Regarding facebook games... This has turned into the primary reason the stove timer is backed up by the smoke alarm.

      beep... beep... beep... beep... beep...

      BEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

      "Sounds like dinner's ready."

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    10. Re:Children, children... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed. This seems more like a battle for a hill so small neither can stand on it.

      Worse than that. Facebook puked up yet-another-UI-twist on top of their giant dataset that keeps people coming back through all the UI twists and Microsoft attempted to take credit for the design.

      When was the last time somebody said something nice about Facebook's UI/UX? They're like the Ebay of social networking: network effects are very strongly in their favor; but everyone spends all their time loathing them for everything else. Why would Microsoft do anything but distance themselves from that?

    11. Re:Children, children... by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      videogames? they are talking about needing a consistant internet connection for their next console to even work. with a 60% give or take broadband access in this country (usa) they are screwing themselves with that. Hell i hate sony after they took my linux from me on my PS3, and i didnt ever expect to want to buy a sony system again, but if M$ is always on a la steam (which is ok because tis a computer running a service, not a console with 1 use..well main use) i might seriously consider pushing all my people back to sony with the PS4 over MS (wiiU is cool , but like the Wii, its not really fair to compare it to the M$ or sony offerings., spec wise

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re:Children, children... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      This was just a terrifically bad idea on Shaw's part. Desperately pleading that you did something first so you should get some attention is never going to win you sales or good PR. That said, it doesn't seem like Microsoft really has any other strategy (except perhaps for their video game market, where they bought their relevance.)

      It seems doubly foolish because Facebook appears to be aiming 'Home' at terribly unexciting Android handsets, including some already in the field that may be upgrade-able(if you can call it that). Is 'the competitor's product that will soon be on sale for peanuts-after-contract, or even downloadable for free, is totally just like ours!!!' really the message you want out there?

    13. Re:Children, children... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Pretty much my sentiment when I read it.

      What happened to good ol' competition and let the better product win? Or, in this time, the product that sucks less?

      I know, I know, it's anathema in this corporate world where competition is equaled to patent infringement.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    14. Re:Children, children... by Opportunist · · Score: 0

      Pretty much this. If you did something first and nobody noticed it, well, then I guess your product or your marketing SUCKED.

      And you have to hand it to MS, their marketing is near perfect, sooooooo...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    15. Re:Children, children... by Opportunist · · Score: 1, Informative

      Steam requiring an always-on connection? Last time I checked my portfolio, few of them require a connection at all (ok, aside of getting the game in the first place, of course), and none require a connection throughout the period you're playing. Unless of course it's a multiplayer game that obviously needs a connection with the other players...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    16. Re:Children, children... by cgenman · · Score: 0

      Games that require an always-on connection will still require one whether or not they're on Steam. Steam itself has an Offline mode which is a bit of a buggy hassle, but can make subway rides / airplane flights pleasantly less introspective.

    17. Re:Children, children... by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      Have you ever known Microsoft to do anything really intelligent to win good PR and sales?

      Of course not. Clearly, they're the dominant OS in the world because of the first-class quality of their software and ecosystem, which is truly superior to all alternatives. It has absolutely nothing to do with market positioning and PR. /Sarcasm disengaged

    18. Re:Children, children... by ackthpt · · Score: 2

      There's no need to fight, you BOTH suck.

      Truly. I'm so underwhelmed by farcebook home I'm nearly into negative territory here.

      Someone tell me where I can go to watch some paint drying on a wall, so I can get some enthusiasm going here.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    19. Re:Children, children... by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Informative

      You really think MS's marketing campaigns have led it to success?

      MS was successful because they were in the right place at the right time by providing the OS to IBM's PC, whose open architecture made it popular for cloning, and because of this popularity tons of application software ran on top of it. Of course a bunch of dirty tricks to ruin competitors didn't hurt, plus they made/bought out some office software which became the business standards. There weren't any advertising campaigns, ever, that helped them in these endeavors.

    20. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is basically what Apple did with Vista, though for some people when Steve Jobs says "laugh" they say "how hard?".

    21. Re:Children, children... by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Microsoft is successful because of their product managers who do a good job responding to customer requests. Their customers of course, are businesses, not consumers. And their communication with customers is amazing. They are a model of how to build a B2B company.

      Their consumer outreach, including their marketing, has always been bad.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    22. Re:Children, children... by PmanAce · · Score: 0, Troll

      I own a Samsung Galaxy S1 and a HTC Windows Phone (bought around the same time 3 years ago give or take). To be fair my android phone is riddled with reboots, performance issues and such while my windows phone is as snappy as ever. I do use my android more every day but my WP7 is where I code on, develop apps and push it to its limits more.

      --
      Tired of my customary (Score:1)
    23. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There marketing to business was totally adequate although for the reasons you state rather easy. But their endevours with consumer marketing has been nothing but one disaster after another.

    24. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silence, the Dictator has spoken.

    25. Re:Children, children... by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Microsoft is successful because of their product managers who do a good job responding to customer requests. Their customers of course, are businesses, not consumers.

      So explain Windows 8.

      Which business customers were demanding a touch-screen tablet UI on their desktop PCs?

    26. Re:Children, children... by Anarchduke · · Score: 2

      Well it goes like this. Ballmer had just scored some really good crack and was smoking it when they asked him about the next operating system Microsoft should design....

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    27. Re:Children, children... by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Interesting

      None, which is why there was huge infighting among the execs at Microsoft. It's a total change in the way Microsoft does things.

      I suspect part of the problem may be that, at the OS level, everyone is pretty happy with Windows 7. They don't really want new features added. Business people aren't giving them feedback, so they're kind of directionless on what new things to add, but still want to create a new OS.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    28. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like a lot of the under-the-hood changes in Windows 8 and consider them improvements. I'm less thrilled about the UI changes and I'm fairly unhappy with the continued chipping away of the basic goodies (games are a good example) without a relevant price drop.

    29. Re:Children, children... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Maybe it was Ballmer pulling a "Jobs", overriding those product managers on a hunch that "mobile/touch is the future". The difference is that Microsoft's business, unlike Apple's, runs for a large part on pleasing businesses rather than just consumers. And of course Ballmer's vision is a bit murkier than Steve Job's was.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    30. Re:Children, children... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2

      So, are you betting on the therizinosaurus or the epidendrosaurus to win the fight?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    31. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is pretty pathetic. Ooh, they integrated search into the start menu, which has been there, on the bottom-left, since Windows 95. And they obviously haven't heard of Outlook Express for stand-alone email (or Outlook's calendar which has colors). And zomg they added an RSS reader to the web browser, just like everyone else!

    32. Re:Children, children... by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      It's been a few years, but still leaps and bounds better than MySpace.. and I've found g+ to be way too bulky for browsers on limited hardware. That said, I also have adblock, and probably don't see all of facebook.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    33. Re:Children, children... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      AC for the trifecta!

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    34. Re:Children, children... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      When was the last time somebody said something nice about Facebook's UI/UX? They're like the Ebay of social networking: network effects are very strongly in their favor; but everyone spends all their time loathing them for everything else. Why would Microsoft do anything but distance themselves from that?

      A sense of nostalgia, I'm guessing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    35. Re:Children, children... by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Which business customers were demanding a touch-screen tablet UI on their desktop PCs?

      The CxOs after they got iPads, you have both information producers and information consumers in business as well and those that consume tend to like touch and tablets. You're probably just not one of them.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    36. Re:Children, children... by therealobsideus · · Score: 1

      Curious... have you deleted all other accounts from other web services? Yahoo? MSN? AOL? Not going to debate how much data Google has gathered on it's users - but you cannot compare that to the massive privacy breaches committed by Facebook. Beacon, anyone? Probably the biggest thing Google knows about me is that I have a huge penchant for gay porn, and I don't mind that - they make it easier to find more gay porn.

    37. Re:Children, children... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Curious... have you deleted all other accounts from other web services? Yahoo? MSN? AOL?

      I never had accounts for those in the first place. But this isn't a general issue that I have. It's specifically Google that I feel has gone way over the line in invading my privacy. For me, way further over the line than Facebook has.

    38. Re:Children, children... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      " Yahoo? MSN? AOL"

      I never had a Yahoo account (though my geocities account became a yahoo account - which I deleted circa 2004).
      MSN has been dead for almost 6 or 7 years.
      Since I live outside USA, I've yet to meet someone who uses AOL.

      Most of those services have very little userbase outside USA - which means very little userbase in total.
      About 90% of the people I know use facebook. Only a handfull don't.
      Around 50% of the people I know have google accounts.
      I have only a facebook account (no google account).

      The difference between facebook and google, is that google makes it hard for you to use you own email, while facebook doesn't care. Google tries to replace all your "useful" stuff, locking you in, while facebook is way more expendable.

      If you don't want someone accumulating endless personal data, those are the only two giant you need to worry about.

    39. Re:Children, children... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Vendor lock-in, monopolistic practices, and treaties with big corporations have kept it #1, not marketing or PR.
      Prior to windows 7, I don't think I ever saw a windows-related ad.

    40. Re:Children, children... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yep, I think this sums it up prettty well. Marketing to businesses isn't anything like marketing to consumers; all they had to do was show thier wares, wine and dine some people, etc. It's not hard to convince businesses to buy stuff from a large, dominant company, thus making them even larger and more dominant.

    41. Re:Children, children... by sourcerror · · Score: 0

      Valve has finally fixed the offline mode last year, your article is outdated.

    42. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's because most of us are sensible enough to recognise the hypocrisy of Microsoft and their Axis partners trying to get the crowds riled up over Google's privacy behaviour. In practice, as far as online services go, Google has better controls over misuse of data than the FUD spreaders.

      So sure, you go ahead and use, Windows, Bing, Outlook.com etc. Contribute your data and statistics to the Microsoft cause. Just don't try to pretend it's not happening, because nobody's fooled by your parroting their "Scroogled" campaign talking points. It's got very old very fast.

    43. Re:Children, children... by therealobsideus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you have that backwards. I can get any and all of my data easily from Google - I cannot do the same with my years of data on my Facebook account. Sure, they have this nice little "archive" button in your account settings... but I've never been able to actually download my account archive from Facebook. And MSN/Live/Whatever branding they have now is far from dead - with Hotmail having around 300 million active users. Yahoo is around the same boat (email wise) with around 280 million active users. And Facebook doesn't care? They switched everyone's email address to default to their username@facebook.com email system. If you don't want this you have to change it manually. Please tell me more how Google is trying to lock you in - at least Google provides a choice, Facebook just forces you to do whatever they want.

    44. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us actually use Facebook for profit. I started the sport of rugby in Honduras with just a few facebook pages.

    45. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of their advertising was done in schools and colleges. Were people learned how to use their off products but nobody elses.

    46. Re:Children, children... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      Curious... have you deleted all other accounts from other web services? Yahoo? MSN? AOL? Not going to debate how much data Google has gathered on it's users - but you cannot compare that to the massive privacy breaches committed by Facebook. Beacon, anyone? Probably the biggest thing Google knows about me is that I have a huge penchant for gay porn, and I don't mind that - they make it easier to find more gay porn.

      Facebook may have committed more privacy breaches, but Google has more information on you no matter what, because they have tentacles everywhere. Facebook, at least they're on entity and it's relatively easy to block them from spying on you.

      Google, not so much. Google owns practically the entire online advertising market, including mobile (both iOS and Android, which forms effectively 95% of the market), they have CDNs and script repos that people reference on their webpages, enforce use of javascript through Google Analytics (a webmaster can force you to go through Analytics - something NoScript actually has to implement workarounds for), and nevermind all the other services - youtube embeds, g+ buttons which tie back to you, and so forth. Hell, even if you never had a Google account, Google's got information on you (and possibly your email address as well - if you've ever sent any email to a gmail account - and it's free and clear information as you've never
      agreed to a privacy policy).

      At least Facebook gets smacked down whenever they do stuff like Beacon. Google, it seems, has enough Android fanatics that they really can do no evil.

    47. Re:Children, children... by byjove · · Score: 1

      You think you don't have a Facebook profile just because you never signed up? If you have ever been mentioned on FB, you have a profile. If any of your friends shared the address book, you have a profile. If anyone has shared something that you wrote, you have a profile. In the industry, they're called 'dark profiles'.

    48. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the ones wanting to sell stupid and worthless software as 'apps' in a store....

    49. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes - a whole lot of people are into some thing we arent into, therefore they must have mental problems which are caused/exacerbated maliciously by said thing. Queue the outcry to protect these poor sub-people from themselves...

    50. Re:Children, children... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not be familiar with BasilBrush. He's an Apple fanboy, through and through (check his post history to confirm). I'm sure his entire life resides on the iCloud servers, but the kind and benevolent Apple would never do anything bad with it. Microsoft is a has-been to him, irrelevant; Google is the real enemy now!

    51. Re:Children, children... by c · · Score: 1

      Which business customers were demanding a touch-screen tablet UI on their desktop PCs?

      Heh. I guess now we know what it looks like when Fortune 500 companies prank each other...

      --
      Log in or piss off.
    52. Re:Children, children... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      AOL largely deleted except as a spam drop, for requested emails. MSN for questionable email and simple 'MSN Home' aggregation of irregularly used gadgets. Yahoo Home similar irregular gadget aggregation. Google+ just a look with no regular use and no automatic logon, Google search registration dropped when they dropped filtering search results, no GMail. I do my electronic social connections manually. I found Facebook far too aggressively pushes full disclosure of all private social connections and continual updating and monitoring, so simpler to drop it. I mentioned my relationship with Facebook as disclosure ie I do not like them nor do I trust them. So I spread my use of services over several portals.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    53. Re:Children, children... by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      You must be pretty young ;) Windows 95 had a HUGE ad campaign and I seem to remember a fair number of commercials for Windows XP as well.

    54. Re:Children, children... by nobodie · · Score: 1

      the only one i have is aol and aim, and that was "given" to my by aol when they took over netscape (i have a netscape account that i still use just to keep them honest)

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    55. Re:Children, children... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      Not outside USA, AFAIK.

    56. Re:Children, children... by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure you have that backwards. I can get any and all of my data easily from Google - I cannot do the same with my years of data on my Facebook account. Sure, they have this nice little "archive" button in your account settings... but I've never been able to actually download my account archive from Facebook. And MSN/Live/Whatever branding they have now is far from dead - with Hotmail having around 300 million active users. Yahoo is around the same boat (email wise) with around 280 million active users.

      And Facebook doesn't care? They switched everyone's email address to default to their username@facebook.com email system. If you don't want this you have to change it manually. Please tell me more how Google is trying to lock you in - at least Google provides a choice, Facebook just forces you to do whatever they want.

      Incorrect, if I create a Google Account with my email (me@domain.com), it creates a google talk account for me@domain.com, so XMPP federation breaks to my XMPP server. The same happens if I create a Google Apps account.
      So if I want a google account, it can't be with en email associated to my personal xmpp account.
      Recently, google disable CalDAV, an internet standard for sharing calendars, yes another lock-in on their behalf.
      Anyone not-using a google account will notices how google is slowly becoming more and more incompatible with the the ouside world day after day.

  2. Which launch event? by symbolset · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  3. Sounds good, Microsoft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your platform is unique, just like everybody else's.

  4. I'm there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here's number 1.

  5. So, a real turd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or a copy of a real turd. Tough call.

    1. Re:So, a real turd by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Or a copy of a real turd. Tough call.

      But when you figure out which one is the original, make sure you give Microsoft the credit for it.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  6. because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Last time I checked everything microsoft has ever done is remarkably similar to things others have been doing for years.

    1. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Nerdfest · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course, when running on Android, the user actually has the ability to *remove* the damn thing.

    2. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      would you like to give an example of something that is actually completely original in the tech industry. Cause the kinect is the best i can come up with, an even that is just a super charged wii (which is just an air mouse).

    3. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Goaway · · Score: 0

      What was it Metro was similar to, again?

    4. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by alen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the kinect was originally made up by an israeli defense contractor
      they pitched it to apple first but didn't want to sign NDA's and agreements not to pitch it to anyone else even if apple refused it
      MS loved it and took it on to develop it further

    5. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What was it Metro was similar to, again?

      Dog shit?

    6. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In spirit, the Zune. In use, see above.

    7. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by roc97007 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What was it Metro was similar to, again?

      Widgets, but less attractive, more annoying, and more difficult to turn the hell off.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    8. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      im no M$ fan,. but so??? they DID bring the tech to the masses. its like that guy you always hear about who made a car that runs on water, even if true, if he cant sell it, it dont really matter now does it?

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    9. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      would you like to give an example of something that is actually completely original in the tech industry. Cause the kinect is the best i can come up with, an even that is just a super charged wii (which is just an air mouse).

      As alen notes, 'kinect' was licensed from a 3rd party outfit(though it cost a hell of a lot more before MS started stamping units out, that's for sure...). Architecturally, though, it is totally different from the wiimote(which, itself, was the combination of not-novel parts from two main suppliers, the accelerometers and the IR sensor module; but it also had the virtue of bringing those parts into the range of affordable).

    10. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Opportunist · · Score: 3

      ...at least as long as FB doesn't strike a deal with his carrier and makes it part of the non-removable shitpile that clogs most pre-loaded phones these days.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    11. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zune interface + WebOS cards.

    12. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A grid of icons? Applications that take up the full screen?
      Never seen that before.
      Anyway, I'm not saying that everything MS ever did is shit, I use their OS all the time.
      I'm just saying that they really shouldn't be complaining about people imitating them.

    13. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

      Well the question has already been asked and answered as far the the First is concerned so yes you can install the launcher of your choosing.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    14. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Boycott+BMG · · Score: 1

      The hardware part was done by a 3rd party, but the software to do the skeleton tracking and other things was all done by Microsoft. Basically the hardware combined a regular camera with an IR camera in an intelligent way to do range imaging. To get from just the camera to what you have with Kinect takes an awful lot of intelligent algorithms. I think that qualifies as innovative.

    15. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As alen notes, 'kinect' was licensed from a 3rd party outfit(though it cost a hell of a lot more before MS started stamping units out, that's for sure...).

      Of course the basic package was, but not the kinect software, which is where the real intelligence is. Much like apple products, none of the hardware is innovative, everything was developed by somebody else, but pulling it all together into a product and producing good software to drive it is the real key.

    16. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      exactly! the xbox alone sold more than any other single pc model despite being nothing more than a pc itself and the reason why is the software. the software is what made it different and made it something else.
      ouya isn't unique either, there's nothing you can do with it that you can't do with any android pc and a ps3 controller, whether it succeeds or not will be down to its software.

    17. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by VortexCortex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What was it Metro was similar to, again?

      Meh, rhetorical question, but I actually have that link so here you go:
      AOL Kids 1996 vs The UI formerly known as Metro

    18. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by davydagger · · Score: 2

      the Gnome Shell, minus "live tiles"

      the *NIX desktop so bad it fragmented the linux community and no one liked it. like 2 years before Win8

    19. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone explain what carriers have to do with anything? This seems to be American thing, but I'm genuinely confused.

      Americans pay like $200 upfront cost for the phone, then are forced to take 24 month contract at something around $50 per month with capped data. That makes like $1400 for that 2 years. What. The. Fuck?

      Here in (Northern) EU, people always buy:

      1) A phone. Whatever you prefer. Some like smartphones, some dumbphones. Costs around 50 to 500e, depending what you like. These new Lumias by Nokia around 250e are very delicious deal nowadays though.
      2) You buy the sim + subscription from a cell provider by month-to-month contract. Nowadays some do offer "hey, get this subscription for dirt cheap if you sign up for a year or two. Usually people don't sign for these 1-2 year subscriptions so they can give middle finger and change provider if they suck.
      3) You throw in your sim card.

      Someone please explain why anyone would prefer the "american way"??? Not only the phone comes 3x more expensive, the service costs shitloads. Then there are these excuses "but but but rural areas and US large country but but", which are totally invalid. Take a look at size of Finland - Yes, we're a "small" country, but consider the fact that slapping our land area on top of east coast of US, that would cover all of the east coast. All of it. And we have only 5 million people living here, with country-wide cellphone and 3G coverage!

      In the US, there would be at least like 100 million people living in that area. Which means you should be able to provide full 3G coverage for that area for almost like FREE and profit enormously still.

      For the comparison, I paid 459e (iirc) for the phone, HTC One S. Was quite expensive at launch, but I really wanted that! :) For the subscription itself, 14e/mo for unlimited 21Mbit 3G (unlimited means unlimited, no caps, no tether limits, dumb pipe. anything else is not allowed by law! telecommunicatins regulation ftw!), and 0.69e/mo for the phone part. I rarely call or text due 3G/internet nowadays. But SMS'es cost 6.9cent and calls 6.9cent per minute. Usual phone bill is around 3 eur/mo for me. Everyone just uses IM/Skype over 3G instead).

      So big question is, how on earth do Americans tolerate these ISP's and their "contracts" ?! Even some parts of rural Africa have better cellural networks than US.

    20. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honey, pack up the kids, we're moving to FINLAND!

    21. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

      I live in a country with freedom...So I can unlock and remove this stuff (unlike in the USA)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    22. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      Well, I just signed a new 2-year contact with Telenor, but they gave me a free Samsung Galaxy III and cut my monthly rate by about 10%, so hell yeah, I signed. (I also noticed that they finally got real 3G working consistently in my neighbourhood *and* lifted my data cap.) They do something like this every time my contract's up to try to keep me from jumping ship.

      So far, it's worked. And I've got both a Galaxy I and a Galaxy III gratis out of the deal.

      For private communications, I use an old dumbphone I picked up from a street vendor a few years ago in Penang (and thus the IMEI is not traceable to me), and a prepaid SIM for which I paid cash here in Sweden. And I buy recharges with cash. Is this not possible in the US?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    23. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Goaway · · Score: 1

      Well, it's... not a grid of icons, really?

    24. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Goaway · · Score: 1

      So MS is ripping off... themselves?

    25. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      Sure, you can remove Home, but God good luck removing some Google app.

      Stop pretending Android is different than everyone else. It isn't, you're just tricked in a different direction and don't realize it yet.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    26. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Not Novel? I was using IR and accelerometers together years before the Wii existed. It was only 'not novel' if you new absolutely nothing about the components involved and how they are used on a regular basis. Note: My usage of IRs and accelorometers on robots for guidance is something I learned from a book years ago, its not something I came up with, its rather well known stuff.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    27. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've been feeling Fido confetti again, haven't you?

    28. Re:because microsoft is always completely original by Drathos · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that doesn't make Facebook Home uninstallable. It will almost certainly be a system app that cannot be uninstalled unless you root the phone. And some of the apps in the suite may be set up to start automatically even if you don't actually use them.

      Thankfully Android 4.1 (or was it 4.0?) added the ability to disable apps you don't like but can't uninstall.

      --
      End of line..
  7. Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's no the first time that people claim concepts as their own, I'm sure there is a 2 man show somewhere who did their 'put people first' campaign for ... their lawnmower... repairs garage. But being a top player in the tech space, in such a short time, and having the same tag line is a bit weak.

    But even weaker is all the coverage of people going 'what if your friends are ugly?' ... trust me, if your friends are ugly, repulse you enough you don't want to see them at all, just a hint, they aren't friends. I have a windows phone, have tiles for groups of friends (family, extended family, friends near me, old friends) ... and when I go back to an iOS or droid device for a few days to check it out, i can't deal with the lack of information about the people I care about. it's the existing future of how people will want their devices to behave.

    1. Re:Exactly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's no the first time that people claim concepts as their own,

      perfect quote for this article.
      Mark Zuckerberg stole facebook or the idea at least; court says he didn't, common sense shows he did.
      I for one don't trust Mark Zuckerberg, there's nothing I feel he wouldn't sell for a buck, or steal for that matter.

    2. Re:Exactly by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Who in the software / social networking / consumer electronics industry is any different?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  8. Dear Microsoft ... by domulys · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Dear Microsoft,

    Facebook tolerates you. It is thanks to them that you remain relevant. E.g., when Facebook Graph Search can't find a particular item, it currently defaults to Bing... but, that can easily change. Please, pretty please, just give them a reason to reconsider their allegiances, and I am sure they will happily discard you like the dead skin off a snake.

    Never forget that the enemy of your enemy is your friend. Besides, if Facebook has taught us anything, it's that regardless of who had the idea first, it's execution ultimately that matters. If you have to tell people that you've won, you've lost.

    1. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "regardless of who had the idea first, it's execution ultimately that matters" you learned that from facebook and not apple? O.o

    2. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if Facebook has taught us anything, it's that regardless of who had the idea first, it's execution ultimately that matters.

      I think it taught us whoever gets to the customer first and never lets them export their data ultimately owns the customer.

    3. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by DogDude · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Facebook tolerates you. It is thanks to them that you remain relevant.

      Riiight... the company that sells the OS used by 95%+ of all computers on the planet needs the latest fad website to stay relevant.... Riiiight...

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah lets wait and see how popular face book home is.

    5. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by chipschap · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh... maybe 90% or whatever % of desktops/laptops, but NOT of devices ... Android and iOS are beating Microsoft ... in the new upcoming world of computing and with the fading of the PC, Microsoft will indeed have to work to stay relevant.

    6. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by larry+bagina · · Score: 0

      Microsoft owns a 1.6% stake in facebook. Bing it for more info.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    7. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by UneducatedSixpack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You forgot washing machines, refrigerators and TVs. Microsoft is doomed!

    8. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by chipschap · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yup, Microsoft is taking it in the chin on the washing machine front :)

    9. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if by computers you mean consumer grade notebook/desktop and totally ignore embedded devices(all oses), unix flavors, linux desktops. the bsd family, routers/firewalls, phones smart or dumb, tablets, tv set chips, etc. well the wider view is that microsoft is in the minority, and it has been that way for a long time. they just happened to break the law to get there for 'normal' desktop computing. i've heard a lot of hype about gaming, but seriously until microsoft got the xbox every previous gaming console came from a non microsoft shop.

    10. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by smash · · Score: 1

      You mean like myspace?

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    11. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by oztiks · · Score: 1

      It's a bit of a "need you need me" sentiment FaceBook Maps and Translate features are Bing driven, what alternative is there for FB? Google?

    12. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Microsoft owns a 1.6% stake in facebook. Bing it for more info.

      What's wrong with Googling it on Duck Duck Chair?

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    13. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by Gumbercules!! · · Score: 1

      Facebook has to tolerate Microsoft - Microsoft owns part of Facebook:
      http://whoownsfacebook.com/

      Not a lot, true but certainly enough to have a small say. Also, Facebook make most of their revenue on PC, not mobile, and PC is still almost exclusively Windows (around 90%), so while Microsoft's star is falling, Facebook still makes most of its money via Microsoft users.

    14. Re:Dear Microsoft ... by idunham · · Score: 1

      Not to mention vacuum cleaners. Microsoft is missing a massive opportunity there.

      After all, they have unparalleled experience in making products that suck.

  9. Hum?! Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Both suck, but saying that facebook copied windows phone is like saying a lawnmower is a F1 sports car!

    1. Re:Hum?! Am I missing something? by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      They both have four wheels and a motor so they are just alike.

    2. Re:Hum?! Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you a lawyer for apple?

  10. Microsoft still owns over 1% of facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that $1.3 billion stake small enough that it is OK to lambaste FB, or will Frank Shaw find himself in hot water? http://whoownsfacebook.com/

  11. Waaaaah! by faedle · · Score: 2

    .. thou doth protest too much, methinks.

  12. Microsoft v Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Whoever loses, we win.

    1. Re:Microsoft v Facebook by c · · Score: 3, Funny

      Whoever loses, we win.

      The only way it could get better would be for the two of them to partner up and build a Facebook Windows Phone. Called the "Kinzune".

      --
      Log in or piss off.
  13. Somebody call the whaaaambulance! by sootman · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are they also upset that they invented the Tablet PC in 2002 and then Apple ate their lunch eight years later by actually delivering it in an appealing form factor that people actually wanted ? "Waaah, waaah, we were fiiiiirst!" Apple learned that "first" doesn't always equal success, but they quit whining about it and did something about it instead. Worked out pretty well for them.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Somebody call the whaaaambulance! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sorry to burst even that bubble. Not to mention Alan Kay's Dynabook concept that goes around for almost 40 years, there's several projects for tablet pc, one example being OMI-NewsPAD (yes, it's a reference to the NewsPad in 2001: A Space Odyssey), a project for a tablet pc in the European Union, test trials ran from 1996 to 1997 (and the project itself started in 1994).
      Later, but still in the 90's Intel announced the WebPad (1999).

      And then comes the always late but "we invented it all!!!" Microsoft in 2002. And we all know how that went...

    2. Re:Somebody call the whaaaambulance! by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It wasn't a 'first' then either(If we really want to go way back, the SAGE guys were pen-computing during the cold war, and getting 99% uptime on vacuum tubes; more recent examples were things like the GRiDpad in 1989, and Go's PenPoint OS); but MS has been dabbling in tablet-like things since "Windows for Pen Computing" was released for Win3.1. They've just been not-succeeding at it for that long.

    3. Re:Somebody call the whaaaambulance! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      What about 2002?

      I was playing with a Linux/Mozilla tablet a year before that. When the iPad showed up, I wondered what had taken them so long.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  14. Companies are becoming like political parties by Morgaine · · Score: 4, Interesting

    [No axe to grind since I use neither MS nor FB ...]

    Stories like this one remind me of politicians playing party politics and slagging off everything the opposition does and says instead of focusing on whether it's a good idea or not.

    It seems that long gone are the days when the top companies competed on product and politics was (ostensibly) about doing the best for the nation. Doing good work has become quite secondary to politicking (in the worst sense of the word) in both areas.

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re: Companies are becoming like political parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, you're talking about a world that never was, my friend.

    2. Re:Companies are becoming like political parties by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, duh. Of course they are. After all, they put up the politicians you then may vote for. That's the beauty of democracy.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Companies are becoming like political parties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's the beauty of democracy.

      The current system has nothing to do with democracy. The US is experiencing a symptom of an economic problem (translated into a legal climate of money for power). Democracy has other unique problems that the US has wiped away and replaced.

      http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/07/opinion/lessig-washington-corruption/

  15. NIH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Microsoft is just mad that they were too caught up in Not Invented Here syndrome that they did not think of embracing Android and building on top of it like Facebook did. So much money wasted reimplementing a whole mobile operating system when they could have just built Windows Phone as a custom UI on Android.

  16. 28 posts so far and not a single one... by mark-t · · Score: 2

    ... mentioning Coca-Cola?

    Oh geeze... my age is showing.

    1. Re:28 posts so far and not a single one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pff - it's all about Red Bull these days, you old fart ;-)

    2. Re:28 posts so far and not a single one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean HFCS carbonated drink formula C? No one cares any more...so long as they get their fix. Now with electrolytes!

  17. Oddly enough by hsmith · · Score: 1

    I fully expect Facebook to sell more copies of their mobile phone than WP8... Not saying either is good. I suspect MS is bitter.

    1. Re:Oddly enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahaha! Oh wait, you're serious.

    2. Re:Oddly enough by chipschap · · Score: 0

      I don't want either one. The same as another poster, I rarely use either Windoze or FaceThing.

    3. Re:Oddly enough by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Windows Phone is definitely the best on the market right now.

      Yes yes, it shows....

    4. Re:Oddly enough by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Mod funny.

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:Oddly enough by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      i dont use a windows phone, but the truth is its not horrible. from my limited use of WP8, i found it way more usable that an IOS device minus the app store issue (which also happened with android in the begining.)

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:Oddly enough by smash · · Score: 1

      How is it the best? If you dont think anyone would want a facebook phone, you've clearly had nothing to do with women.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    7. Re:Oddly enough by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Just ask Siri http://www.pcworld.com/article/255508/siri_says_nokia_lumia_900_not_apple_iphone_is_the_best_smartphone_ever.html

      seriously though as funny as iphone saying windows phone is better just because it had no dislikes and 5 5star ranks. so are you one of the five windows phone users?

    8. Re:Oddly enough by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If that's true, it's just sad. When did the superlative become inferior to the positive?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:Oddly enough by DogDude · · Score: 1

      The Windows Phone's interface is much, much better than the other two. It has a lot more stuff integrated into the OS, as opposed to the other two that require tons and tons of discrete "apps" for basic functionality.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    10. Re:Oddly enough by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      So?

      I know several Microsoft fanboys who own iPhones. They never use OSX but they have an iPhone.

      A few Android users as well. They run Windows even though they have a Linux phone.

      You do realize that it is possible to pick products based on their fit for your usage rather than because you're such an ignorant fanboy you must buy the one thats for your team.

      Another great addition to your message was the intentional misspelling of those companies. Let me give you a hint, that stopped being cool or funny when you turned 12 or in 1992, which ever came first. It makes it clear you're just spewing fanboy rather than clear rational thoughts.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    11. Re:Oddly enough by smash · · Score: 1

      OK so it has a nice interface. The more important feature is 3rd party applications and it falls flat there against android and iOS.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    12. Re:Oddly enough by DogDude · · Score: 1

      Well, you really only need 3rd party applications if your phone doesn't do what you need it to do. Windows Phone has more functionality built into it than the other two. I haven't ever run into an application that I needed that was unavailable on Windows Phone 8.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  18. Re:windows phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, so weak. What a waste of electrons.

  19. Chanting this in the hallways... by SethJohnson · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Are they also upset that they invented the Tablet PC in 2002 and then Apple ate their lunch eight years later by actually delivering it in an appealing form factor that people actually wanted ?

    I'm not sure how you're sourcing this, but this is actually a very accurate depiction of Microsoft's deluded perspective. A couple of years ago, a friend of mine was working as a consultant on some projects with Microsoft and was flying to Redmond frequently. I asked him if the people he was working with were feeling disillusioned about where they've been heading and their prospects against the competition. He related that they were proud that their company had already invented the tablet several years ago.

    Internally, they must be bragging about that as a morale-booster or something in the face of pretty daunting prospects for what they're working on now.

    Seth

    1. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by kesuki · · Score: 1

      sorry but captain picard called prior art on your tablets http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yVqHoGKQXLI

      looks like sony (who did all the displays for st tng) invented the tablet computer first...

    2. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      Dr. Bowman laughs at Captain Picard's presumption.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    3. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by jellyfoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In my experience with a few Microsoft employees, I have yet to meet any of them who are highly critical about the direction the company is headed. They all seem to believe the radical decisions made by the company will pay off in some way despite the mass hatred towards them.

      The only ones that are truly critical about Microsoft, no longer work there. I'm strongly of the belief that Microsoft has a very good indoctrinating and brainwashing methodology with their employees. This infallible belief in thinking they're at the forefront of technology and know what's best for tech can only be explained by mass delusion. Which horrifies me.

    4. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not Hal??

    5. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain Picard is in the future you stupid bastard!

    6. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      Moses laughs in your face. The 10 commandments weren't carved, they were from an RSS feed.

    7. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mass hatred of them" Yeah, what is like to be a dinosaur, MS hater?

    8. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or perhaps they simply believe in the work they are doing. I came to Microsoft from a competing company recently because I think they're in a good position to do some really cool things and, though I know it's not for everyone, I like the Metro direction.

      lol et tu Slashdot?? (Capcha: inferior)

    9. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My name is also Seth. I also go around copying my name into the body of my posts as if it was relevant to anyone but myself.

      Seth

    10. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by jellyfoo · · Score: 1

      Who ever said I was a hater? I pity them more than anything.

    11. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by jellyfoo · · Score: 1

      If you honestly continue to believe in a direction that's not producing any real dividends (your phone/tablet strategy is still failing and there's widespread disappointment for Windows 8) then that's arrogance of the highest level which can only be explained by delusion. It's really as simple as that.

    12. Re:Chanting this in the hallways... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope that new job works out for you. My fingers are crossed that you're not assigned to some me-too project that will get scrapped just after release. If you need office supplies like paper clips, pens, and staples, stop by the empty cubicles that belonged to the people who used to work on these Microsoft projects:

      Kin
      Zune
      PlaysForSure
      Sesame Street TV Game
      WebTV

      If you moved to Redmond in order to work on one of these projects, I hope you are renting with a month-to-month lease:

      WindowsRT
      Windows Store (brick and mortar)
      Windows Phone
      Steve Ballmer's assistant

  20. Windows Passion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Nobody is excited about Windows phones. There is no passion for the platform. But its not not just Windows phones.

    I think the game is up for Microsoft. They are delivering some amazing things now but nobody can see it. I'm not saying that everyone is blind, but Microsoft has lost our attention. Top SQL admins are moving to SQL 2012, but out side of them, I don't see much. Organizations are just now making the move to Windows 7. That's a good 3 years of a good product lost. Server 2012 is the most significant server OS they have ever released, yet nobody is excited about it. Windows 8 Phone is actually a good product, the hard part is getting it into people's hands. Windows 8 start screen actually works well with the Surface Pro, just not on any real computers. (Sorry MS, I gave that start screen an honest try but it has to go on my desktop/laptop)

    I know I come across as a fanatic for writing this, but every IT group that is a Microsoft shop should be this passionate about the new stuff. The fact that they are not should be a big issue for Microsoft.

    1. Re: Windows Passion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good points. Otoh. iPhone and droid are each showing strains. FB is pissing off users.

      I remember when sgi/IBM was the debate. Both fell.

      Truth is its a more open game than we think.

    2. Re:Windows Passion by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      I think the game is up for Microsoft.

      The game isn't up, but their heyday seems to be past.

      I heard a speaker a while back who had a view of waves in the digital industry. There was IBM. Then there was DEC. Then there was Microsoft. Then there was Amazon. Then there was Face book. Next there will be...?

      Many of the "old" ones are still around, and still huge businesses. They just aren't viewed as the hot item / trendsetter anymore.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  21. Apple is the real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    30 years ago
    Seriously, Microsoft has just been copying the longest and thought they could get away with it

  22. What ever happened to professionalism and respect? by jellyfoo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I'm getting fucking tired of companies slagging off at each other, with either aggressive or passive aggressive comments made between various CEOs or VPs or whoever thinks they're important enough to get the spotlight for a few minutes.

    Make good stuff that people want. If a competitor is doing something that's risks drawing attention away from your stuff, don't act like children. Just shut the fuck up and present something even better. If you feel you have to acknowledge the competition, do it with some old-fashioned class for goodness sake. This bickering gets old extremely fast.

  23. Unbelievable... by technomom · · Score: 1

    Could Microsoft possibly be any more butthurt over this?

    1. Re:Unbelievable... by kamapuaa · · Score: 1

      More butthurt than the VP of Corporate Communications writing something about it on his personal blog?

      Yes, it is very possible to be more butthurt than that.

      --
      Slashdot: providing anti-social weirdos a soapbox, since 1997.
    2. Re:Unbelievable... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yeah, Ballsy could be throwing chairs over it...oh, wait...maybe he is...

    3. Re:Unbelievable... by oztiks · · Score: 1

      Yes but let's not forget about the guys at Jabba and what they have in store in the coming years.

      What I see for FaceBook's future is pretty inevitable. Consider Google+ for Droid, Skype for Windows, Apple figures something out and then there is FaceBook which simply becomes a desktop access point based on people's personal preference, as you would make your choices of search engine you'd also make your choice on what Social Media website to use and if there is an open standard for all then you're only going after the interface preference not what data resides because it all becomes the same data anyway.

      If those projects for tying open communications comes to pass then what's really stopping Android from adopting a syncing facility that sends data to Facebook after uploading it to G+? or Apple doing the same? We are talking about text and photos, it isn't complex blocks of encrypted binary here it's stuff the web does every single day.

      The world is gagging for a proper communication standard which trumps sms, voice and most defiantly social media. Mobilising Facebook though sounds hip to investors it's bringing it closer to it's death. The people who build mobile devices are smart enough and capable enough to build Facebook features directly into the phone as they are capable to build features into their own social media platforms. All I see the FB website will become is a desktop front-end for this open standard one day.

      Of course Facebook can try all they want to lock it down but remember who's devices are they running on? and though the shit fight between device creators and Facebook hasn't started yet. I'm almost certian when FB fails to come up with the goods within the next few years there will be this exact shit fight. Though Google and Apple are used to this kind of crap I feel FB isn't because there ain't no way Apple or Google are prepared to give up market share on their Appstores to some 3rd party no matter how popular they are.

  24. real thing by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    Ok, compared to whatever Facebook Home is, I'm willing to stipulate that Windows Phone is the real thing.

    The question that immediately comes to mind is, the real what?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:real thing by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

      Ok, compared to whatever Facebook Home is, I'm willing to stipulate that Windows Phone is the real thing.

      The question that immediately comes to mind is, the real what?

      The real attempt to be the latest gimmick that everyone thinks they have to have.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    2. Re:real thing by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Does that really matter? You have two companies here who fight over who has the biggest, only problem is that what they're comparing is tumors.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:real thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pile o' poo...

    4. Re:real thing by roc97007 · · Score: 1

      Does that really matter? You have two companies here who fight over who has the biggest, only problem is that what they're comparing is tumors.

      Brilliant. That is my new favorite quote. :-)

      --
      Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    5. Re:real thing by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      The real successor to the Zune.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  25. True by Taantric · · Score: 2

    Microsoft has the right of way on this one. Anyone who has used Windows Phone for the last couple of years can spot the lovingly copied design in Facebook Home aka Death of Privacy.

  26. Re: What ever happened to professionalism and resp by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Well if they are following their CEO's example, then what do you expect? Remember it was Ballmer who boldly predicted Apple would never see the iPhone in any significant numbers. Today it makes more money for Apple than all of MS products. Steve Jobs was a prick but he was right more often than not.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  27. Who in their right mind copies WinMobile? by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    Jeez, might as well just break out the blueprints for the Edsel while they're at it and wash the ride down with some New Coke.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Who in their right mind copies WinMobile? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      But didn't a few people actually like new Coke?

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  28. cool story frank by smash · · Score: 1

    Let us know when you have some users.

    --
    I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
  29. Re:windows phone by Black+Parrot · · Score: 1

    Sounds like bad LoTR fanfic poetry.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  30. "But I was here first" by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    It never meant anything. Doesn't mean anything to the bully at the movies who takes your seat, didn't mean anything to the settlers when the natives told them.

    Besides, MS, how does it feel to be on the other side of "But I did that first, he just copied me!" for a change?

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  31. Re:What ever happened to professionalism and respe by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2

    Seriously, I'm getting fucking tired of companies slagging off at each other, with either aggressive or passive aggressive comments made between various CEOs or VPs or whoever thinks they're important enough to get the spotlight for a few minutes.

    What do you expect them to do? Innovate, and sell us stuff that's actually useful?

    Nah, that's too much trouble.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  32. Re:What ever happened to professionalism and respe by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Relax. As long as they aim at each other, at least they're not bothering their customers.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  33. Really... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook will find it can't lift just one facet of a diamond.

  34. Not true by Frankie70 · · Score: 1

    I had done a submission a week back - http://slashdot.org/submission/2570591/idc-predicts-windows-phone-to-be-the-fastest-growing-platform

    Overall, IDC says Windows Phone and Windows Mobile devices accounted for six percent of the 227 million smartphones shipped worldwide in the fourth quarter of 2012. For the year, Windows Phone made up 2.6 percent, however, the analyst firm is predicting Windows Phone to be the fastest growing platform between now to 2016 with a compound annual growth rate of 71.3 percent. IDC expects Windows Phone to account for 11.4 percent of smartphone shipments by 2016, largely off the back of declining Android market share.

            Windows Phone handsets have outsold the iPhone in seven markets including India, analyst firm IDC has revealed, and beat out BlackBerry in 26. Some of the countries where Windows Phone pipped the iOS handset in Q4 2012 were Argentina, India, Poland, Russia, South Africa and the Ukraine.

    1. Re:Not true by Anarchduke · · Score: 2

      Yes, Windows Phone had a growth rate of 100%. Five more people bought them.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    2. Re:Not true by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      And this is the third or fourth time I've seen this same quote posted.

      Let's hope you find a new one soon, eh.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    3. Re:Not true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, no.

      Three people bought them. One of them already had an Android phone, but bought WinPhones for his wife and 2 teenage daughters.

      But, yeah, 5 actual phones.

  35. Ya, but... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

    Windows Phone requires an "always on" connection...

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  36. Facebook Home by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Facebook Home has a chance. Microsoft Phone is a joke. Anything microsoft connected to 'phone' is a joke. They should have stopped before they screwed up Nokia (now dead).

  37. Re: because microsoft is always completely origina by SilenceBE · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The original version was vastly more superior then what kinect is offering. There was a lot less lag and overlapping bones weren't any problem. Microsoft removed hw stuff and countered that with software, but the end result was a system that was usuable but a step back from the original design. I wouldn't call that innovation.

  38. Both of them are wrong by miroku000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Both of them are based on the previous Adroid-based Motoblur. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motoblur

  39. Copycat? Facebook? NEVER! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Can you tell I'm being sarcastic? Facebook is by definition a fast follower (and therefore copycat). Social Networking, News feeds, photo sharing... everything was a copycat. And this isn't actually problem - its a very good strategy. Watch someone else struggle and make all the mistakes, then copy the result and maybe improve it slightly with far fewer resources than it took making the mistakes.

    MS is just whining (again). Go throw a chair.

  40. Re:What ever happened to professionalism and respe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Microsoft is notorious for slagging off other companies. Especially Google.

    Refer to 'Gmail Man', 'Googlighting Stranger'.

    It's part of their culture, and no doubt a reflection of Ballmer's obnoxious personality.

  41. karma by stenvar · · Score: 1

    After Microsoft copied just about everybody in the industry and presented other people ideas as their own... I suppose it's karma.

  42. Oh yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because they really would want to copy Windows Mobile's success!

  43. Get in line. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    "Ha, Facebook! Microsoft tried to me-too a smartphone before you did. We copied first!"

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  44. Re:windows phone by karbonforms · · Score: 2

    Nah. Vogon.

  45. Unsurprising from Macroshaft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft: We're becoming insanely irrelevant we better do something! Hey, I know, let's take credit for having the best everything and put everybody else down. We can make a commercial and call out Google and then we can have interview answers that put down other huge companies as copycats. Then maybe people will pay attention and buy our garbage.

    Great plan. You wouldn't want to just make something with a high level of awesome and then possibly just market the awesome part.