Slashdot Mirror


UK Benefits Claimants Must Use Windows XP, IE6

First time accepted submitter carlypage3 writes "Benefits claimants in the UK are being forced to use Microsoft's now obsolete Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6 software. The Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) states that its online forms are not compatible with Internet Explorer 7, 8, 9 and 10, Safari, Google Chrome or Firefox. As if that wasn't unnerving enough, the Gov.UK website says that users cannot submit claims using Mac OS X or Linux operating systems, either." (Note: as we noted not long ago, it's not just the DWP that's stuck using IE6.)

230 comments

  1. Re:Google Glasses Problem by MindPrison · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Yeah, say that to a huge beefy ex. marine that just loves his Google Glasses, and then we'll talk.

    ...oh wait...

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  2. Actually this is a good thing by Ash+Vince · · Score: 5, Funny

    This actually makes perfect sense. On a modern PC it will involve the user learning about virtualisation (to run XP) and then also learning how to configure windows (to not run updates). This is great way of preparing dole claimants for an IT job so by the time you have gained enough skills to claim any dole money you have enough skills to go straight into a job as and IT support worker for the dole office and their crappy old IT systems.

    --
    I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    1. Re:Actually this is a good thing by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      This actually makes perfect sense. On a modern PC it will involve the user learning about virtualisation (to run XP) and then also learning how to configure windows (to not run updates). This is great way of preparing dole claimants for an IT job so by the time you have gained enough skills to claim any dole money you have enough skills to go straight into a job as and IT support worker for the dole office and their crappy old IT systems.

      Or, if they just need XP and IE6 they could just like, you know, go to their grandma's house. And grandma's already hooked up with bennies so she's probably got some beer in the fridge.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    2. Re:Actually this is a good thing by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't know how their system works but years ago when sites demanded xp and ie for use I would tell my browser to lie to them. I set my user agent string to XP and IE although I was actually running linux with konqueror and 8 times out of 10 the site worked fine. Some I had to do from work since they actually used something specific to the systems they demanded.

    3. Re:Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention Piracy, since you can't normally buy user licenses of XP anymore

    4. Re: Actually this is a good thing by mspohr · · Score: 5, Informative

      All the grandmas I know have switched to tablets

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    5. Re:Actually this is a good thing by Zemran · · Score: 1

      They are on the dole. They could not afford to pay for it if it was available.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    6. Re:Actually this is a good thing by tibit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where it doesn't work, some greasemonkey magic is all you need. Sometimes that magic is substantial (1000s of lines), but I've got sites that are IE-only by design and rely on IE APIs to work on both Safari and Firefox. I've even re-implemented some ActiveX controls using plain old javascript. Given the amount of effort (a couple weeks in the evenings) by someone who doesn't do such a thing very often, I think that the site developers should be publicly shamed. As in rotten tomatoes or eggs thrown at them in the middle of the city square, or something like that.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    7. Re: Actually this is a good thing by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      That's probably supposed to be funny, but it's insightfull...

      --
      bickerdyke
    8. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      I don't care if she's got pillz, I'll just settle for the beer. Hopefully she still has some.

    9. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the grandmas I know (which isn't that many) have never owned a personal computer of any kind.

    10. Re: Actually this is a good thing by matria · · Score: 5, Informative

      er... I'm a granny with 8 grandkids and I built my first PC over 20 years ago, the year before my first grandchild was born. Ran computer repair and small business/home networking shops in two states and two continents. Mac user now, although obliged to use a company-provided HP from time to time as well. Three Parallels VMs on the Mac for testing the websites I build. Also have a small smartphone; no tablet yet. Still haven't made up my mind which one to get.

    11. Re:Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They probably use a vbscript + ActiveX plugin that runs a full OS scan to make sure the customer hasn't installed any hazardous, modern-day operating systems or browsers that could compromise the position of power of the service provider.

      As a secondary function, the ActiveX plugin will scan the claimants' browser history and documents for any indications of monetary transactions or savings beyond a predefined treshold that could give clues of a potential abuse of income or property capped benefits.

    12. Re:Actually this is a good thing by amiga3D · · Score: 1

      You're not paranoid if they really are out to get you.

    13. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm a granny ... Mac user now

      It's OK if you're a granny, let's not be too harsh.

    14. Re: Actually this is a good thing by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Who would have thunk that the lowest-bidder only has a old WindowsXP box running IE6?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    15. Re: Actually this is a good thing by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I understand you take exception to this generalization because of your experience. Do you think you are representative of the granny population? Or are you an exception to the generalization?

      Any blanket statement will have outliers, including this one, and I find it odd to find replies like these modded up - I'd rather see actual stats on how many grannies are tech savvy rather than a single anecdote with 3 people who also have mod points agreeing.

    16. Re:Actually this is a good thing by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      Either that, or it's a clever way of forcing the claimants to prove that they can't afford a more modern system.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    17. Re: Actually this is a good thing by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      That's probably supposed to be funny, but it's insightfull...

      If the set of grandmas he knows happens to be empty, his statement can be irrelevant while not being incorrect at the same time.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    18. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To file an online tax return in Australia, IE (thence MSWIN) is required.

      I choose not afford it although there's information, after stating said requirement, about its eligibility for a tax deduction if we're silly enough to use an"Other OS".

    19. Re:Actually this is a good thing by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      also it will teach budding unemployed IT people who cant afford windows how to use Linux and run IE 6 under wine totally free

    20. Re:Actually this is a good thing by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Let's go to the Old Folk's home!
      We can get doped up and then all get stoned.
      Let's go to the Old Folk's home!
      I'd have been there more if only I'd known!

    21. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      All the grandmas I know have switched to tablets

      Really? Suppositories didn't work out?

    22. Re: Actually this is a good thing by HJED · · Score: 1

      Actually only Windows is required not IE, but that is because it is a desktop application.

      --
      null
    23. Re:Actually this is a good thing by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      This actually makes perfect sense. On a modern PC it will involve the user learning about virtualisation (to run XP) and then also learning how to configure windows (to not run updates). This is great way of preparing dole claimants for an IT job so by the time you have gained enough skills to claim any dole money you have enough skills to go straight into a job as and IT support worker for the dole office and their crappy old IT systems.

      What to configure? Microsoft provides you with Windows XP Mode which is a virtualized preconfigured environment for those few applications that need XP. I believe IE6 was also one of them as it's one of the few things that XP mode was needed for.

      I don't know how their system works but years ago when sites demanded xp and ie for use I would tell my browser to lie to them. I set my user agent string to XP and IE although I was actually running linux with konqueror and 8 times out of 10 the site worked fine. Some I had to do from work since they actually used something specific to the systems they demanded.

      Given they need XP and IE6, it would imply they use some ActiveX crap that only works in IE6 (since I think IE7 redid ActiveX in order to be more secure). No amount of emulation can get crappy insecure ActiveX to work. It's partly why IE6 is still around because IE7 broke a lot in the name of security. From IE7 onwards, things aren't so bad.

    24. Re: Actually this is a good thing by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Hey, Pils ain't that bad.

    25. Re: Actually this is a good thing by kermidge · · Score: 1

      I take your point, but I'd rather speak with the woman with 20 years of practical computer savvy and a successful business. Should she also be someone's special little princess (AC below), good for her.

      Beats hell out of contemplating the stupidity of the DWP.

    26. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a pretty active granny, having to commute and defend yourself.
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1708452&cid=32798690

    27. Re: Actually this is a good thing by matria · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I believe I was up to four or five grandkids at that point. And yes, I can knit booties.

    28. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I understand you take exception to this generalization because of your experience. Do you think you are representative of the granny population? Or are you an exception to the generalization?

      Any blanket statement will have outliers, including this one, and I find it odd to find replies like these modded up - I'd rather see actual stats on how many grannies are tech savvy rather than a single anecdote with 3 people who also have mod points agreeing.

      Well, I'm 61 and female - although no granny. I build my own computers and run a PC repair and network small business. At the moment, my main PC runs Linux, (and my laptop Windows 7 - just for a a couple of programs that are Windows only) but I have been known to build and use a few Hackint0shes, too.

      In my experience, grannies are far more tech (and otherwise) savvy than is generally assumed - they just don't want the grandads (or the grandkids) to get wind of it, 'cos it might really hurt their (the grandads) image as THA MAN.

    29. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er... I'm a granny with 8 grandkids and I built my first PC over 20 years ago, ...[snipped]...

      Ma'am, you are my favorite lady in the whole Internet!

    30. Re:Actually this is a good thing by lissnup · · Score: 1

      I am old enough to be a grandmother. I don't drink or use drugs, prescription or otherwise. And I absolutely do not use Internet Explorer of any version for any reason. I prefer Linux, but I also built a desktop about 2 years ago, and installed Windows 7 so that I could run proprietary software apps. If I have to start claiming benefits I plan to rock up to the local library and demand free access to their antiquated computer system to complete my application forms.

    31. Re: Actually this is a good thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think one of the points was to draw out an idiot like yourself and allow you to demonstrate in public just how much of an idiot you really are. And of course, you took the bait. I mean, obviously you did, since you are an idiot.

    32. Re:Actually this is a good thing by Ash+Vince · · Score: 1

      What to configure? Microsoft provides you with Windows XP Mode which is a virtualized preconfigured environment for those few applications that need XP. I believe IE6 was also one of them as it's one of the few things that XP mode was needed for.

      So if I do a default Windows 7 or 8 install does Windows XP Mode get installed by default then so hence require no configuration? Thought not, as thats what to configure.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
  3. 2002 called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It wants its software bundle back.
    Seriously, I suspect this is probably a conservative scheme to make it very difficult to apply for benefits. Someone should bring legal action post haste - but, of course, poor people cannot afford to do this.

    1. Re:2002 called. by SJHillman · · Score: 2

      Hanlon's Razor begs to differ.

    2. Re:2002 called. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1, Funny

      Perhaps they just want to make sure that you are actually poor before you can receive any dole payments. In other words, somebody with a more modern system is more likely to be able to afford to cover their own living expenses.

      Crude, but what if it works?

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    3. Re:2002 called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      That is an entirely imbecilic suggestion and completely independent of fact.

    4. Re:2002 called. by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 0

      Pull up google and look up what tongue in cheek means, numbnuts.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    5. Re:2002 called. by Zemran · · Score: 1

      and therefore probably correct.

      --
      I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
    6. Re:2002 called. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      appropriate/obligitory XKCD http://xkcd.com/875/

  4. No they aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just something they have put online, the old method of claiming by post or going to the office like always is still there.

    1. Re:No they aren't by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I was already wondering... because it sure sounded like a catch 22, where you need a computer with internet access to apply for money 'cause you can't afford your living expenses, let alone a computer with internet access...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:No they aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. Just because the average /.er would never physically go to an office to apply for unemployment doesn't mean that millions of other people don't. They probably were proud of this 10 years ago. Now its obsolete and theydon't have a budget to upgrade it. Somebody with a Mac tried to apply, got upset, and posted this worthless article.

    3. Re:No they aren't by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...or someone who has modern machines in their local public library.

      A system that requries IE6 in 2013 is a disgrace. It doesn't matter who is supposed to use it, or where, or how few people are actually expected to use it.

      Your snark ignores the fact that this isn't just about Mac users. It's about ANY ONE that has a modern Windows configuration.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:No they aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Modern? Heck, a 6 year old configuration would likely be on IE7 which wouldn't work either.

    5. Re:No they aren't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must live in the States where there are lots of libraries with modern computers. Most of the public libraries here in Snarkistan are closed or closing. In fact the libraries are probably the best place to go to find a PC with IE6.

    6. Re:No they aren't by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Every library around these parts has computers with Internet access, available for free. You don't need to own a comuter to use one.

    7. Re:No they aren't by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      The offices of which you apply will have a terminal to apply

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    8. Re:No they aren't by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Exactly as you'd be hard pressed to find an XP+IE6 set up even at your poorer libraries, I know that in our local library they are running first gen C2D with Vista Business and IE 8 so it would be impossible to use this system there and I wouldn't be surprised to hear that most UK libraries are about the same tech wise.

      So while I can understand them not wanting to spend the money to update the program having it on such an out of date platform is probably more useless than not having it at all.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:No they aren't by icebike · · Score: 1

      But are the libraries running Windows XP?

      This chart seems to suggest that XP's toehold in the UK is only at 16%.

      http://gs.statcounter.com/#os-GB-yearly-2012-2013-bar

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:No they aren't by gronofer · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough the requirements of that website match the equipment available in my local library exactly. I'm not in the UK however.

  5. Re:Google Glasses Problem by radiumsoup · · Score: 1, Troll

    You're new here, so let me give you a bit of advice:

    1. Prepare for ridicule. You're not providing much of any substance at all, and this little hissy fit has nothing to do with the article anyway. That's not well tolerated here.
    2. Very few people will actually see your post, as it's pretty much going to instantly be moderated down as a "troll" post due to its... well, trolliness, really.
    3. See #1.

  6. I honestly don't understand why.... by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...we even still have this problem. Seriously, stop being short sighted fuckwits. Stop using vendor specific code. Start using shit that passes the W3C validator. Problem fucking solved. Imagine that! There is absolutely no excuse for any webpage out there to require a specific browser or browser version, short of being able to meet current web standards.

    1. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happened because the Brits believed everything Bill Gates told them.

    2. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually according to TFA it works with a few other browsers from the 2004 era, but only on Windows. The real summary here is "We haven't done anything to upgrade this system in the last 10 years" and the world moved on, which will happen from time to time. If it was 1990 it would be totally reasonable to ask for documents to be submitted in WordPerfect format, in 2013 it's not. If your maintenance budget is $0, this is eventually going to happen regardless.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    3. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      It's because standard code won't do all the bells and whistles that customers expect. Do you really not know this, in 2013? Seriously?

      Oh, and stop starting your comments in the Subject line, that's freaking stupid. The Subject line is for the subject of your post, the body is where you start writing.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If your maintenance budget is $0, this is eventually going to happen regardless.

      They do have a maintenance budget, but any penny spent doing actual maintenance is a penny your cronies can't pocket.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    5. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      No, this happened because the Brit bureaucrats are doing everything Bill Gates paid them for.

    6. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Joce640k · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's because they all use 32-bit ActiveX controls and even if you're running a 32-bit version of Windows 7 (hardly anybody is) the permission system doesn't let you install them without a huge amount of esoteric messing around.

      Remember back in the 1990's when we told Microsoft that ActiveX was a bad idea...? Yeah, about that.

      PS: We have the exact same problem here in Spain. All the accountants, etc., pretty much have to use Windows XP if they want to get any work done.

      --
      No sig today...
    7. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's because standard code won't do all the bells and whistles that customers expect. Do you really not know this, in 2013? Seriously?

      What I expect and what I desire are widely diverging paths. I want low-bandwidth, browser-agnostic, search-engine-friendly web sites. I expect Web 2.0 OMG Ponies.

    8. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Simple. It's because of how things run in public services.

      They decided they need that kind of software. So someone, most likely someone with limited IT knowledge but a lot of knowledge of the process involved, sat down and wrote the specs. You may rest assured that it included everything this bureaucratic process needed, but lacked everything from the IT point of view, like compatibility with different browsers or the ability to upgrade and update to keep current with technical development.

      The whole mess got into a public bidding and unless something important stood in the way (like, say, the nephew of someone important needing a job), the cheapest offer got called.

      Now, these specs come with a catch: You can't simply amend them when you realize "Oh, gee, we should have...", no such luck. You open yourself to lawsuits from those that didn't get the contract, and since changes later invariably will increase the bill, their claim would be that they could have delivered for that price (especially if their offer was lower/better in some way). So even if you notice that something is missing, you DO NOT change those specs. EVER.

      It's also near certain that they neither have the source code nor an agreement that the company doing the job agrees to hand over the details if someone else should get to update the system.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    9. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by silviuc · · Score: 2

      Governments are subordinate agencies are and have always been fuckwits. Not because they are dumb but because bribe money goes a long way. They also don't employ IT techs, everything is out-sorced and every time they want some done they pay up more than it actually costs because it's a good way to make some money for themselves. Works in my shitty EU member country why wouldn't it work for the brits too.

    10. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by smpoole7 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > Simple. It's because of how things run in public services.

      Yes and no. Some of it is just that old Demon Money(tm) and the fact that we were in a protracted recession.

      We were using a certain company for ad insertion on our Web streams. (Three radio stations total.) We were having trouble getting the software to work, so we contacted their help/support team. They used VNC to look at our system and said, "we only support Windows XP."

      I sent them a rather nastily-worded letter. They claimed to be cutting edge, with the ability to sort and insert commercial content intelligently, and all other sorts of bells and whistles. And yet, I said, "you will only support a 10-year old operating system?"

      They replied and allowed (as someone granting a great concession) that they would work with us, but could make no guarantees. We canceled the contract and went with another company.

      In this case, it's simple: they hired someone to write the package several years ago, and wanted to re-sell the same package again and again. They didn't want to pay to update the software. So, they lost a lot of business. Assuming they're not bankrupt now, I hope they learned an important lesson. :)

      --
      Cogito, igitur comedam pizza.
    11. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by MrL0G1C · · Score: 1, Informative

      If it was 1990 it would be totally reasonable to ask for documents to be submitted in WordPerfect format

      Eh? No, it wouldn't.

      --
      Waterfox - a Firefox fork with legacy extension support, security updates and better privacy by default.
    12. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its a 1 liner to install an activex control, even on Windows 8. IE still runs as a 32bit executable, even on 64bit Win7 and 8

    13. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by lightknight · · Score: 1

      But do not worry, all of their problems will be solved with a move to the cloud. Yes, with the cloud, the websites will upgrade themselves, so they will continue to save money. The magical cloud which becomes whatever your local sales team tell you it is.

      On a more serious note, I'd love to know who these people are that have nuked their own maintenance / internal upgrade paths. The costs for writing new stuff (inevitable?) might be rather..punitive, compared to just paying the bill.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    14. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      ...we even still have this problem. Seriously, stop being short sighted fuckwits. Stop using vendor specific code.

      Fine. Who's paying to rewrite it all? You?

    15. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of this is because organizations use Oracle applications which used to require an ActiveX control called Jinitiator to load the Java Virtual Machine in the browser. When Jinitiator was no longer necessary because of native browser support for Java client apps, Oracle stopped upgrading it and provided instructions on how to reconfigure your app server to use the native browser's method for starting Java. But many IT departments were asleep at the wheel and since there was no business value in changing the config but there was a risk of a small outage, this fix took many, many years to get implemented. And it probably still is not implemented in a lot of places.

      With government sites offered to the public, there really needs to be court action against the minister in charge for allowing this anticompetitive action to continue. There is no good reason to block the public from using Firefox and Chrome.

    16. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Solandri · · Score: 2

      In this case, it's simple: they hired someone to write the package several years ago, and wanted to re-sell the same package again and again. They didn't want to pay to update the software. So, they lost a lot of business. Assuming they're not bankrupt now, I hope they learned an important lesson. :)

      That's partly OP's point.

      With private businesses, you have to accommodate the customer or you go out of business.
      With public services, your customers have to accommodate you or they won't get the service you're providing.

    17. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, the vendor will be when all their customers abandon the ancient unsupported systems provided. The point is if it was written to W3C standards in the first place it would work on any later browsers. I program my sites in Linux, test them on every OS/browser I can get my hands on. I have 10+ year old sites that still work and look great in the latest browsers. There are a couple of detection routines to keep IE6 and IE7 happy, but that is because M$ refuses to honor standards.

    18. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by HiThere · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, in 1990 it would be reasonable. There weren't any acceptable open standards. (On Linux I ended up doing my word processing in HTML with a text editor. Truely lousy.) These days there are several reasonable choices, but rtf is probably the most widely available. Most end users don't like to use markup languages, and few documents are worth the effort of Tex.

      I suppose you could say that in 1990 it would be better to just ask for text documents...but that wasn't very good either, if you needed special characters. And formatting text documents can be a real drag.

        (FWIW, I'm still not satisfied with OpenOffice indexing. I haven't checked the LibreOffice indexing recently, but from a glance it looked about the same. From my point of view the best word processor, except for a few major flaws, was MSWord 5.1a for the Macintosh. Everything since then has been inferior. This is largely because I really liked the markup I could use for indexing in that system, and it fixed a huge number of problems from earlier versions. Probably, of course, I've forgotten numerous bad features, but I really like being able to turn-on visible markup chars and add them in or edit them by hand, and then turn them off to see how it will appear.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    19. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Red_Chaos1 · · Score: 1

      Why was this comment modded to -1? It's true. The company hires a competent designer to make shit using web standards, and the company passes the cost on to the customer, just like they do with anything else.

      Christ, this place can be just like Reddit. "I don't like what you said so fuck you!" *downvote* *downvote* *downvote* :rolleyes:

    20. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      If your maintenance budget is $0, this is eventually going to happen regardless.

      If the site had been programmed to published standards instead of vendor-specific kluges, it would still work fine today.

      This is solely a consequence of poor vendor selection or project definition.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    21. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      No, the vendor will be when all their customers abandon the ancient unsupported systems provided.

      This works well when the customers have a choice. When you have niche software with high barriers to entry--usually because it's stuff that has to work the first time, so nobody wants to take a chance on anything that's not already in wide use--you often pretty stuck. Of if it's say, a *government website* where you naturally have no choice to go elsewhere. Like in this case.

    22. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You have a budget one year to buy new fangled computer systems. Then you go 20 years without any more extras in the budget.

      It's like getting a tattoo when you're a kid, then not being rich enough to have it removed when it's time to go job hunting.

    23. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      But in the 1990s when we told everyone that ActiveX was a bad idea they just called us a bunch of luddites.

    24. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by jeremyp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Works in my shitty EU member country why wouldn't it work for the brits too.

      Because, in British government, corruption of this type is pretty rare. I have worked with the UK government as a supplier on many IT contracts and I have never seen corruption like that. What I have seen is gross incompetence leading to wastage of tax payers' money on an almost unimaginable scale.

      My guess is (it is only a guess, I wasn't involved) that, in this case, the supplier told them it would cost more money to support the other browser (back in 2000 there was mostly IE and some Netscape and then just a tiny handful of weirdos running stuff like Mozilla) and it would have been pointed out that even the people with other browsers could fire up IE if they needed to, so I'm sure they just went with IE for cost reasons.

      having narrowed the supported platform down to IE, the chosen supplier would not have felt constrained to use only standards compliant features and that would have locked the DWP in to the one technology.

      Then there would be no money available to fix the UI because "everybody uses IE 6" until the point where the falsehood of that statement could not be denied and then the DWP would already be thinking about the shiny new system that ail be replacing that old system, so there would still be no money available. But the shiny new system was probably slated to arrive about now but has slipped by a couple of years due to incompetent management and so on.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    25. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      short of being able to meet current web standards.

      And that is essentially the problem. When the web pages were first created, IE6 was the de facto standard. And they just essentially refuse to upgrade.
      They can change the code today, to meet the current standards. Will it still work a dozen years from now? I'm sure the standards will have been updated by then.

    26. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can choose which version (32-bit or 64-bit) of Internet Explorer to run since 64-bit Vista. The 32-bit version is the default. For a while, it was actually a slightly more secure way to run IE since there weren't 64-bit Flash and Java plug-ins so you were less likely to get pwned. That has now changed.

    27. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Linux? 1990? Which distro?

      (and modded informative?)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    28. Re:I honestly don't understand why.... by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      This is 95% of software services companies.

  7. Denmark used to have that issue as well by MindPrison · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not many years ago in Denmark, they had that issue as well.

    Even with the banks you had to use IE(some version), otherwise you just couldn't pay your bills.
    I'd say they did us a favor, because it taught a lot of people to get "off the system" instead of being dependent on it.

    The narrower your choice as a citizen becomes, the more need for freedom you'll have (Geez, I might want to hold back on the booze, starting to sound like Yoda here)...;)

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
    1. Re:Denmark used to have that issue as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fancy font-boy, "oh, look at me!"

      Fuck off.

  8. Makes sense. by lxs · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly if you can afford a new computer or have the skills to run Linux, you should be able to fend for yourself.

  9. Hardly anyone affected by this by lga · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, it's crap that applying for these benefits requires ancient browser tech, but note that this is for three specific benefits which will affect hardly anyone. The most common of these benefits, Disability Living Allowance, is closed to new applicants because it has been replaced by Personal Independence Payments. And Attendance Allowance was long ago replaced by DLA, now replaced by PIP except for those over 65.

    1. Re:Hardly anyone affected by this by cardpuncher · · Score: 4, Informative

      Attendance Allowance has not been replaced by DLA. AA is available to over 65's who need support in their daily living owing to illness or disability. It's a key benefit for elderly care. That said, the application process is lengthy and often requires supporting medical evidence so people tend to rely on charities such as Age UK to do it for them - I can't really believe that anyone would *want* to do this online.

    2. Re: Hardly anyone affected by this by prefect42 · · Score: 2

      Also note that if you're blind, you may be applying for DLA via a website that, yes you guessed it, isn't accessible...

      --

      jh

    3. Re:Hardly anyone affected by this by lga · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is what the "except for those over 65" bit at the end of my sentence was about.

  10. The contractor should be fired and billed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The contractor should be fired and billed for an HTML5 replacement.

    1. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, because everyone who's poor and doesn't have a job needs to be dinged for a new PC that has an up to date browser that is as html5 compatible as possible.

      From frying pan and into the fire.

    2. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Luckyo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, because you know, the people who are in need of benefits are known to be geeks, and love to learn new IT systems.

    3. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Opportunist · · Score: 2

      I'm quite certain that the one that should be fried is the person writing the specs. It's almost certain the contractor wrote to spec, and if they don't include something akin to "must run on all browsers", why should he bother doing it?

      Remember: When you're working for the government, deliver what is specified and NOTHING ELSE!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Dogtanian · · Score: 2

      I'm quite certain that the one that should be fried is the person writing the specs.

      I know the system is crap, but that's a bit draconian... :-)

      Anyway, in all seriousness, this story is (intentionally) trying to make a mountain out of a molehill, as it relates to a small (and obsolescent) number of benefits and the fact that an old system hasn't been properly updated for the better part of a decade.

      Yes, it's utterly shite that the systems were written to be so specific to IE6 (and earlier versions') foibles that they don't even work with the half-decent later versions of IE, let alone any other browsers. Obviously if they hadn't been so short-sighted, they'd still be running (if somewhat dated looking) on modern browsers.

      And yes, it sucks if you're one of the people still wanting to claim those benefits.

      But it's a story about ancient software designed when IE-specific sites were still (unfortunately) the norm and a system that hasn't been updated for the few people still requiring it. I have to admit I thought at first that this was something about the JobCentre's system to track users' jobseeking using cookies only working on XP/IE6 or older, but it's nothing like that.

      It's a fair story, but not the geek outrage article it's presented as.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    5. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      No. The replacement should be plain HTML forms. Nothing fancy, but something which works with every browser, be it IE6 or the newest Firefox or Chrome. Give it some nice CSS styling, but don't have it rely on anything but standard HTML forms. Do not depend on JavaScript. Do not depend on ActiveX. Do not depend on plugins. Do not depend on a certain browser.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Immerman · · Score: 1

      It would be easy and cheap for the website to provide links to one or more compact and easy to use live distros as a service to people running legacy systems. And I'm betting damned near everyone in the UK has access to a $0.10 blank CD and a computer with internet access and a CD burner - at a library, cafe, or friend's house if not at home.

      As for learning a new system, what's to learn? Insert disc, boot computer, get something not terribly different than what you're used to. Plenty of distros mimic windows fairly well - and really all you need is to be able to push the button in the corner and have a list of programs pop up. Or better still have an "Internet" icon on the desktop - that's pretty common as well. Firefox is pretty much Firefox regardless of platform, and most other popular browsers aren't much different in terms of basic usage either. Sure if you want to use it as your daily computer there will be a learning curve, but that's mostly due to a difference in available programs than in the UI itself. It's really only when you get to customizing stuff that the UI differences reveal themselves, and most people don't do any sort of customization on Windows anyway.

      Of course the real solution is for a government service portal to restrict itself to using bog-standard HTML that can be properly parsed by any web browser regardless of how old or modern it is. Well, maybe HTML3 or so, once the web had begun to take on it's current form. There's absolutely no justification for using any sort of vendor-specific extensions or other "blingy" features - this is a portal for people to access essential government services, not an attempt to impress potential customers with whiz-bang features and eye candy.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    7. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly not certain if you're trolling or really that ignorant of reality.

    8. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by kermidge · · Score: 1

      Best suggestion I've seen today. (out of mod points)

    9. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Well I'm not trolling, and I don't think I'm terribly ignorant. What aspect of my post do you find so unbelievable?
      That anyone with a computer and internet access has access to a CD burner?
      That for trivial usage there exist Linux LiveCDs that will boot directly to an environment virtually identical to Windows?
      Or that the first priority of a government service website should be maximum usefulness to as broad a swath of potential users as possible, even if that comes at the expense of minimaly-functional "bling" that breaks compatibility? (And which incidentally increases both creation and maintenance expenses to no good effect).

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    10. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      The fact that you find it likely that people in need of benefits are the people who have time, willing to spend the effort and have the ability to dig inside the intimate parts of their computers.

      You're essentially the guy who sees people who don't have bread, and telling them to eat cake, then wonder why you look ignorant.

    11. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about digging into the computer? - Dowload disc image, burn, reboot. Remove CD when you want your system back to normal. It wouldn't even be terribly difficult to create an executable iso-wrapper that includes a stripped-down disc image burner so that users can't screw up that step - then it's just download, run, reboot. Something even the most ignorant users can do, as attested by the mountain of crapware any non-techy accumulates.

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    12. Re:The contractor should be fired and billed by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      "Who said anything about baking? Just get the cake slapped together, put it in the oven, wait for it to finish and eat!"

  11. Why is that a problem ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Department of
    Work -> most businesses still stick with XP; unemployed people can't afford anything newer
    and
    Pensions -> old people use old PC's or none at all ;)

  12. On purpose by cerberusss · · Score: 0

    I bet it's on purpose. Currently the applicants are pulling benefits. But the only way to deal with their godforsaken malware-ridden childporn-routing spam-sending virus-infected backdoored Windows machines, is to install Linux. It's a nefarious plot, but it's a bulletproof way to train their lazy-ass benefits claimants into true Linux Sysadmins.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:On purpose by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These systems are obsolete, the benefits in question have been replaced by others. This is just a feeble attempt to drum up dweeb outrage.

    2. Re:On purpose by tgd · · Score: 1

      These systems are obsolete, the benefits in question have been replaced by others. This is just a feeble attempt to drum up ad views.

      Fixed that for you.

  13. Phew dodged a bullet there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luckily I still use Windows ME.

    1. Re:Phew dodged a bullet there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you wouldn't have done that upgrade from Windows 95 you would've been toast!

  14. Re:Google Glasses Problem by JavaBear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    4. He threatened with violence, which is actually illegal, and he didn't use an Anonymous account either.
    5. Nothing secret about the camera.

  15. Compatibility mode?` by Selur · · Score: 0

    Doesn't the magic compatibility mode work? If not better use XP in a VM (VMs don't need Linux installed; still got a Win2k Image I sometimes start up to play some old games)

    1. Re:Compatibility mode?` by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      Compatibility Mode only swaps out the user agent string and the rendering engine. It doesn't change anything else, such as browser security settings. For example, if the site is using SSL 2.0 only, then no modern browser will allow a connection to it (2.0 being rather broken). However, an old enough browser might still allow 2.0, which is a setting independent of the rendering engine.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  16. Fewer Claimants with DOS by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    That way your payments you dole out will really drop fast.

  17. Claim it! by xushi · · Score: 2

    Can I claim the license for MS OS for me to be able to submit my claims ? I sure as hell wouldn't be able to afford to buy a new OS if I were visiting the benefits claim site ...!

  18. Use Firefox 1.0.3 by Quick+Reply · · Score: 1, Informative

    From the article, these are the following supported browsers:
    Microsoft Windows XP: Internet Explorer 6.0, Netscape 7.2, Firefox 1.0.3, Mozilla 1.7.7."
    Firefox is still available (Windows link) and is fairly independent from the underlying OS, so it would probably work on Vista+/Mac/Linux too (If you can find Mac/Linux links).

    Still a pain to have to pick and choose browsers. It is easier for the average person to use the offline version.

    Even easier for the hacker to compromise such an outdated website and input their benefits claim directly into the database tables
    (and already approved for their 10 fake identities of course).

    1. Re:Use Firefox 1.0.3 by kthreadd · · Score: 4, Informative

      oldversion.com

      If you're going to download old Mozilla software, at least download it from Mozilla's FTP site where all versions are archived.
      http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/

    2. Re:Use Firefox 1.0.3 by yuhong · · Score: 1

      I think newer versions will work, it is just not officially supported

  19. A Plot by geoffrobinson · · Score: 1

    A plot to show people that libertarians are on to something.

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
  20. So Opera is okay toi use then? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    along with every other unmentioned browser...

  21. As usual, total nonsense. by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Informative

    I went to the website using the Safari browser on MacOS X, and without any problems opened the PDF form (which supposedly cannot be opened), started filling it in, and printed it (to a PDF file to avoid wasting paper, but that's the same thing). So this works absolutely fine if you have a modern Mac running MacOS X 10.8 (I didn't try older versions), and you either have a printer, or you have the e-mail address of a friend who has a printer (on a Mac, the "Print" function lets you print to your own printer, to a PDF file, to a PDF file stored in "Web receipts" which is quite handy, or to a PDF file that is mailed somewhere). You put the paper into an envelope and mail it in. That's it. So if you want to get these benefits, there is absolutely no need to use Windows, Windows XP, or Internet Explorer 6.

  22. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Mitt, is that you?

  23. Antique website by Sesostris+III · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Being in the UK and working in IT, I actually for once RTFA and visited the site. To start with I must admit I was flabbergasted. However, looking at it more closely, it is clear that what we are looking at here is a web-site that was created when the latest OSes and web browsers just didn't exist. Clearly someone has thought to insert the statement that you may have problems with these later OSes and web-browsers, so the site content can be tweaked, but the actual site itself (and the underlying architecture) was probably written years ago and left unchanged.

    One give-away is that the site uses ASP (rather than ASP.NET). I doubt any new site has been written using ASP for over ten years! (ASP.NET came out in 2002).

    So there we have it, an antique, a living fossil. Enjoy it while it is still up.

    --
    You never know what is enough unless you know what is more than enough. - Blake
    1. Re:Antique website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If they'd written HTML instead of IE6, they wouldn't be in this predicament.

      But no, managers used Windows and IE6, they wanted the "bling" that ActiveX controls "gave" them, they bought into the bullshit sales tactics of Microsoft.

      And now they have to pay someone to fix that shit.

    2. Re:Antique website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds right. Back in the day putting in such disclaimers, especially for business and government sites, was pretty much SOP. Now wiring the site to actually bounce unknown OSs and browsers, that's something else.

      .

    3. Re:Antique website by Phrogman · · Score: 2

      If they do replace it all, I bet they opt for the top end HTML5 driven solution - resulting in a problem for those who don't have computers modern enough to run an HTML5 browser :P

      Just make your fucking websites using bog standard HTML forms, zero javascript and everyone can be happy except the designers who were hoping to charge extra for all the unnecessary bling enabled by javascript.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
    4. Re:Antique website by ray-auch · · Score: 1

      If they'd written HTML instead of IE6,

      RTFA - site was developed for, and supports, a range of browsers, not just IE, not just Windows.

      All the browser versions supported are ancient - but then so is the site. It's effectively a deprecated site only used for some benefits that are being phased out anyway - so why throw money away on updating it ?

    5. Re:Antique website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What they should've said is, if you have Netscape Navigator running on Windows 98 you're out of luck.

  24. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Violence and education is the only solution to Google Glasses problem.

    I'm pretty sure that you taking your medication would be another solution you haven't properly considered.

  25. Customers didn't expect it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Customers didn't expect it, never wanted it. The upper management did. Bling. Makes them look like "their team" does great work because of their great leadership.

    And Tony Blair not only had his nose up GWB's anus, but also was busy chowing down on the arse of Bill Gates. The dude was seriously star-struck.

    1. Re:Customers didn't expect it. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Huh? What does politics have to do with web standards? WTF

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    2. Re:Customers didn't expect it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Everything. In particular the usage of them (or the lack of it) in large government bureaucracies. It's all down to bribery, contacts, idiocy, etc. I think the last time I heard that politicians beneficially did something FOR the people on a large scale was Australia's successful ban on guns.

    3. Re:Customers didn't expect it. by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      What does making people use Windows XP/IE6 have to do with web standards?

    4. Re: Customers didn't expect it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've done some web work for government projects involving data submission. The technical criteria were not : " ah, shit, we need this by, um, next week because the damn minister got questioned on it and the fool said we have a system, and we don't. Please, please ... anybody, make something which looks like a believable system."

      I could have delivered a Flash animation to great hanks, if it arrived in to to keep the minister from further immediate questioning.

  26. Tory reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If your computer is not ancient enough to have IE6/XP, you've obviously got too much money and must be a scrounger.

    1. Re:Tory reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Up to 2010 Labour were in charge so they have more to do with the situation than the LibDems and Torys. Vote UKIP.

    2. Re: Tory reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's *exactly* what we need. A bunch of bigots, neo nazis and former investment bankers running the country. Smart suggestion.

    3. Re:Tory reasoning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, he's right: up until 2010, literally no one was in charge. Labour didn't even exist then, no sir. The economy collapsed all on it's own, which is why the Labour Party then sprung into existence on the 6th of May 2010.

      The Labour Party also didn't exist prior to 3rd of May 1979, just so we're clear.

    4. Re: Tory reasoning by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      the UK has republicans?

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    5. Re: Tory reasoning by dkf · · Score: 1

      the UK has republicans?

      Yes. They're a variation of craziness, largely on the left of politics, that feels the most important thing is changing the way the head of state is selected. (You know, instead of getting the economy moving properly again, things like that.)

      There's also the equivalent of US Republicans; they're called Conservatives, and they're feeling rather worried by a minor party called UKIP right now (who could be likened to the Tea Party I suppose, but they're not the same; the details of politics really vary a lot between countries, even if the smell emanating from it doesn't change nearly so much).

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  27. Another case of "Lets put it on the web! Duuuh" by linebackn · · Score: 1

    forced to use Microsoft's now obsolete Windows XP and Internet Explorer 6

    Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 is only just now obsolete? No, it has been obsolete since sometime around 2003 when Microsoft let it stagnate.

    This is what happens when you put something "on the web" that doesn't need to be on it. It sounds like the user base for this is now small enough the people who need this should just contact them in person, or by telephone, or perhaps just good old pencil and paper.

    But no, it has got to be "on the web", in a database, on a computer, with XML, and object oriented. And then they won't spend any money to update it to the constantly evolving/devolving changing rearranging web "standards", and then it just sits out there and rots.

  28. Not forced to use XP by skine · · Score: 2

    There is still the option to send the forms by mail.

  29. Its okay ... by tgd · · Score: 0

    If you can afford a Mac, or a computer newer than XP, you don't need to be sucking off the public teat.

    And if you're running Linux, you're probably living with your parents, anyway.

    (*ducks*)

    1. Re:Its okay ... by gnasher719 · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you can afford a Mac, or a computer newer than XP, you don't need to be sucking off the public teat.

      That, my friend, is total nonsense. This site is for people getting benefits for disabilities etc. For example, I have a well-paying job. With some bad luck, I might get some illness that makes it impossible for me to drive a car. If I can't drive to work, I can't drive to work and lose my job. The UK benefits system would (possibly) pay to have me driven to work. Which is a lot, lot cheaper because of the taxes that I would continue paying than paying me unemployment benefits. In other words, people with disabilities might be in good jobs and have plenty of money while still receiving benefits.

    2. Re:Its okay ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had a well paying job and all you needed was a ride to work... just call a taxi.

    3. Re:Its okay ... by OnlineDrawingLessons · · Score: 1

      : PPPPPPPPPP

    4. Re:Its okay ... by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

      It is called "maintaining your living standard". Two taxi rides every day can amount to 3-4 thousand euros per year or more, depending on the distance. Which, given a "standard" well-paying job, amounts to a month's net salary (give or take). Losing a month's pay on transportation only is a lot, even if you are grossing 75k yearly, and your living standard is at stake. Which could mean a psychologist's bill in the long run (even more so, if you factor in your disability as well). So that small help from the community is a huge help for such people.

    5. Re:Its okay ... by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Quite often these forms will be filled in by agencies (usually charities) acting on behalf of the claimant.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
  30. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This right here is the first and only reason I have for purchasing Google Glasses.

    I want to know exactly who you are by seeing you attempt to attack me, so I can kill you.

    Have fun trying to assault and mug people with two bullets in your kneecaps and three in your groin, bitch.

  31. Exaggerated BS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The website might say that Windows XP- and IE6- is required, but I successfully filled out a claim for my partner yesterday on Linux Mint 14 and the latest Chrome developer channel build.

    The thing that amazes me is that the DWP has spent many millions on its IT system, yet:

    - the benefit dispatch system is based on an ancient text-based terminal system dating as far back as at least 2000, if not earlier. I spoke to another engineer who worked on it some time ago, who said that the system is based on a combination of DOS and Netware.
    - the LMS front end is a completely seperate Delphi based system that has not been updated in at least a decade
    - all their IT systems are completely seperate - updating the mainframe does not update LMS and vice versa
    - last time I worked with the DWP, they sent updates between branches *by snail mail*, although I think this is no longer true
    - it was one of the few parts of the GOV.UK overhaul left untouched, and
    - they own a whole /8 - that they barely use a fraction of - at a time IPv4 addresses are scarce.

    That said I'm not at all surprised by this, seeing as much of the DWP is stuck in the Stone Age as far as computing is concerned. Many of the staff have no idea LibreOffice and Linux even exist. I'm not even going to go into the major clusterf**k that the Universal Credit system is inevitably going to end up being.

  32. Better solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let him hit you, then sue for everything he has.

    Then add "pain and suffering" on top.

    1. Re:Better solution... by WhitetailKitten · · Score: 1

      Additionally, the evidence is easy to capture.

      "Hey, asshole with Glass! I'm gonna beat the shit out of you!"
      "Glass, record a video!"

      Go ahead and assault someone wearing a head-mounted cloud-synced camera.

    2. Re:Better solution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who would post something like OP probably doesn't have much of anything to sue for. In fact, I'm almost certain it's just some little, angsty kid going through "stuff" that nobody else could "understand". Fighting someone like that would be like crushing one of those noisy little ankle biter dogs with your size twelve combat boots just because they barked at you from behind the safety of a fence.

  33. or the other way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The corollary to Hanlon's razor is that stupidity and malice are indistinguishable -that's real life.

  34. it works by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has anyone tried to use it? i just did im on Linux using firefox its just warns you it might not work but it does.

  35. goes back to before IE even existed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When Mosaic first came out with audio plugins... They explained quite clearly that you didn't want to define a "shell" program as a plugin --- as I recall "... you don't want to execute a script from just anybody..."

    And Active X is just that.

  36. Run by old hats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I've worked in local government IT in the UK, it is a world of pain. My machine is a 1gb Pentium 4, it takes me 15 minutes to get to my e-mail from a cold boot. I mentioned why we are still using XP since it is EOL next year, I got the feeling it hadn't crossed anyone's mind. There are lot of old hats in UK government who are still working the same way they did 15 years ago.

    In my current place I was shocked they don't use source control, and roll their own logging routines when there are better free libraries already out there. Everyone seems to do "daily checks" as if monitoring software hasn't been invented yet. The software that is bought in is even worse, it's tragic.

  37. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Opportunist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The short sighted conservative has spoken.

    Allow me to ask you a question: What do you think would happen if we do what you suggest? You then have a lot of people who don't have a job, have no chance to get one, have no money and need it for food and shelter, or they die.

    You have money.

    Take a wild guess what happens next.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  38. Bring back Virtual PC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and give people a vpc with ie6. Done.

  39. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Recording a person without their permission is also illegal in a lot of places. In the UK to legally wear these you'd need a sign above your head saying you are recording video.

  40. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Daily reminder that udachny pines for a dictatorship of industrialists, by his own admission.

  41. Works just fine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With the Opera web browser. Funny how many government websites tell me my browser is not support (Canada for exemple) and yet everything works perfectly fine. If your staff is too damn lazy to test their shits correctly instead of putting a useless message, you may need a new IT staff.

  42. Windows XP Mode by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

    Windows XP Mode for Windows 7 purposefully comes with IE6 so you can use it for situations just like this if you need to. You can of course upgrade it to IE7/8 if you want to.

    Also, All IEs after 6 can switch to 6's rendering engine using the IIE Dev Tools (IE7 requires them to be installed, IE8 and up bundles them) which may be sufficient to use the site.

  43. who in there right mind would do this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft isn't even going to be supporting ie6 and winxp after this year.

  44. There's no underemployed solicitors in the UK? by onebeaumond · · Score: 1

    IE 6 was designed to be unmigratable. No one disputes it, not even Microsoft. So the resulting years of monopolistic profit taking should be used to help develop software tools to migrate old html. If Microsoft did it on their own, everyone would praise them and say "it's the right thing to do".

  45. Virtualization service by hey · · Score: 1

    Somebody should open an online virtualization service. It emulators XP/IE6 for you.

  46. Re:I agree, totally wrong by bkmoore · · Score: 2

    Allow me to ask you a question: What do you think would happen if we do what you suggest?

    You're pretty much have the same situation as in Pakistan. Low taxes, everyone owns firearms, religion plays a strong role in society, drugs are legal, high military spending as a percentage of the GDP, etc. The question is how many Libertarians want to emigrate to Pakistan?

  47. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Zemran · · Score: 1, Informative

    Bollox, in the UK it perfectly legal to film anything or anyone in a public place.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  48. Not new by Murdoch5 · · Score: 1

    It's actually not that new hearing how an online submission / program can't be ran on Linux or Mac and needs IE to run. When I was in school there was this online software called "Angel", to spite the fact it was a horrible pile of a software to begin with, the company wouldn't even talk with you if weren't using Windows. You can tell a lot about a developer simply by looking at how the software they develop, web and desktop, works across all the major platforms, including the kind of support they deliver. Any company who makes a web based product and wants to tell me it needs browser X on OS Y to run gives me the vibe that they have some pretty junior developers on staff or some really lazy and brain dead ones. I don't think it's acceptable to in this day and age segment programs and the Operating Systems they run on.

  49. Re:I agree, totally wrong by LihTox · · Score: 1

    We tried it their way once. It was called "feudalism".

  50. Translation.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't want to spend money of effort. YOU do all the work, and pay all the money, users.

  51. Stupid by wadeal · · Score: 1

    The article and summary ignore the fact that the systems is obviously older than Windows XP at the least. They cannot guarantee it will work on anything newer. Like any website or system designed for an older system... This is not news.

  52. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In a perfect world your argument would be correct, but in the real world what happens is people get into a bind, can't get out without help, and turn to crime. If enough people do that it is called a revolution and much like turning a compost pile, new shit ends up on top and what was on top is now on bottom. This will happen anyway, eventually, but government benefits reduce that to something every couple of hundred years rather than every generation.

  53. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Faluzeer · · Score: 2

    Bollox, in the UK it perfectly legal to film anything or anyone in a public place.

    Indeed, however the mere fact that it is legal has not prevented the Police from arresting people for doing so, at least where filming the Police is concerned...

  54. Re:I agree, totally wrong by pwizard2 · · Score: 0

    And you truly think the rich don't steal and redistribute? Their actions are what made the economy shit the bed in the first place.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  55. Privatize all governments! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's amazing how in every country, governments are just a bunch of slackers. Get companies in to privatize them, make them profitable with a constrained set of products they can make money on to pay for their administration and weapons etc. They shouldn't even need taxes. They should have a free monopoly on a countries industrial raw materials only - oil natural gas,steel. For everything else they should have zero involvement in it. i.e:

    Nothing gets made if the government doesn't allow companies to profit from making things, so the raw materials can't be too expensive.

    The government itself isn't allowed to make anything.
    The government should be forced to offer raw materials to all citizens in it's country for the same rate they have to pay themselves for them. If it's expensive for everyone else it's expensive for them too. If they pay themselves too far over the cost, the surplus money must go to the people (not just government). For countries that have no resources, they could have a monopoly over something else, like imported resources.

  56. Siebel again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was made with Siebel.
    You know, the crap company that has kept all its customers back for a decade...

  57. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People respond to incentive, there will always be people who steal, that's not the point, the point is not to have theft and redistribution institutionalized.

  58. But... our government forms have to look pretty? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason you can't submit this stuff using 1999 style CGI with a handful of tags on the screen. A government benefits form does *NOT* have to look pretty. That's where all the incompatibility comes from. I bet I could solve their front-end problems very easily, and I don't really do web stuff. Would it look pretty? HELL NO! But it'd get the job done. For cryin' out loud, the DMV don't look pretty. If we took this mentality and lifted into "meat space", the DMV would have a frickin' koi pond, a fountain, a coffee shop with live jazz, and a buffet but you could only get your license if you drove in backwards.

  59. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    not to go spelling/Language Pedant isn't that properly Bollocks? (which is the UK local version of BS?)

  60. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Revolutions are an exception, not the rule, they don't happen with the majority support either.

    Majority of people are employed under any system, majority of people don't need government growing and stealing from them under any system.

    Also majority of people on welfare are only there because of the wrong incentives (due to theft, unauthorized power of government) not because they need to be on welfare.

    Majority of people on welfare should be working, not sit on welfare.

    The real benefactors of this type of propaganda that is in your head are the politicians who need the ever dependent class to exist and expand, because that's what expands the power of the politicians. The unemployed on welfare, the union thugs that are protected with government laws, a large part of the SS and Medicare recipients constitute an army for the politicians, who threw away the Law, the Constitution because they built that army.

    An army of thugs, of chimps, of monkeys, a mob consisting of amoeba like animals that need to be kicked off their asses and into the world where they are not cuddled by the government that steals on their behalf, takes the 95% of the theft proceeds and throws the 5% to the mob in form of free bread and circuses.

    Even if some of them are violent, that is what private security forces are for. In any case, all of this nonsense is created by the mob working to undermine the law and promote theft and redistribution. It cannot be stopped democratically, because democracy is what created it, it will only stop economically when the hydra will eat enough of its own tail that it will choke on it and die, that's how that regime will fall.

  61. I'd put entire IT department by kawabago · · Score: 1

    In the oubliette.

  62. Re:I agree, totally wrong by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

    It's already institutionalized to the point where I'm ashamed of this country. Any society where the rich can steal everything that's not nailed down with utter impunity is an absolute shithole to live in at best and doomed to fail at the worst. How many wall street bankers have been prosecuted? If it were up to me they would be dragged out and literally crucified. There are more than enough resources to go around; the problem is the rich don't want to share. Income inequality in the USA is at the highest level it's been since the gilded age.

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  63. Re:I agree, totally wrong by headwes · · Score: 1

    Why the fuck does any working individual, who is getting robbed by the mob this way, why is even one of them is still left in these socialist nightmares of countries?

    I'd like to know this too... Why are you still here?

  64. Except, there's an issue with Acrobat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Extra twist that I learned with the IRS' W-9 form. You fill that out on the version of Acrobat running on OS X you can't read all fields when viewed on the Acrobat version of Windows. Duh. So now I keep to versions of the W-9 now, one for Mac OS X (latest version) and one for Windows (XP, incidentally)

  65. Re:I agree, totally wrong by udachny · · Score: 0

    Yes, it has been institutionalized to the point where it is absolutely unbearable and forced people with capital to move capital away especially since the 1971 default on the dollar. Any society where the mob armed with the politicians can steal everything that's not nailed down with utter impunity is an absolute shithole to live in at best and doomed to fail at the worst. How many politicians have been prosecuted? If it were up to me they would be dragged out and literally crucified. There are more than enough needs that need to be satisfied, and more can be found on a fairly constant basis; the problem is that the mob does not want to work at all, it wants to use the politicians by giving them unauthorized power they are too happy to take to steal from people who in fact build the economy around these amoeba chimps. Income inequality is lowest level it's been since 1911 and that's because so much capital left and went to be productive in other countries, the thing that is highest in history of human kind is inflation and the number of paper dollars floating around.

  66. Re:I agree, totally wrong by udachny · · Score: 1

    I am not, moved my business and moved myself over 3 years ago now, that's the entire point. People who want to work and be productive and not have their productivity stolen from them have to move, that's why trillions of dollars of capital savings left USA, which means so many of the productive jobs left, did you not notice? The jobs that USA still creates are all unproductive jobs, either government or various service sector jobs that require that more debt is inquired in order to pay for them, so they are a net economic drain on the system, they are increasing the trade deficit, not decreasing it, they eat resources for consumption, they don't allow resources to be saved in order to start production.

    AFAIC anybody still starting businesses in USA either has serious government ties and relies on that to help them maintain a monopoly or they are just kidding themselves, they won't make it. Whoever still operates a business in USA better find buyers to whatever they produce somewhere outside of the States, because the dollar will collapse there will be no buyers inside the country, they better figure out how to export their products or services.

  67. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Typical teabagger. Why don't you go fuck ayn rand's rotting carcass?

  68. It's Seibel E-systems by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    The whole site is built on Siebel E-Systems, an old CRM system, which generates the pages. Seibel is more or less defunct, having been acquired by Oracle.

    The code is spectacularly version-specific. The error messages in Javascript code on the site indicate how tightly coupled this code is to very specific quirks of older software:

    • "The script debugging feature is typically automatically enabled by Microsoft Visual Studio products. To improve performance of the Web browser for use with Siebel employee applications, it is recommended to disable script debugging in the Internet Explorer browser."
    • "To fix this manually, in Internet Explorer menu, choose Tools > Internet Options > Security. Then choose the %1 security zone and click on Custom Level. Change %2 to %3."
    • "To fix this manually, in Internet Explorer, choose Tools > Internet Options > Advanced Options. Clear the %1 check box."
    • "Failed to retrieve Internet Explorer version from this machine."
    • "There are some recommended settings not set correctly. You may experience functionality or performance problems. Are you sure you want to continue?"
    • "This is required for use of Message bar, CTI toolbar, Workflow designer, Personalization business rules designer, Smartscript designer, Org-chart designer, Sales Pipeline Charts and Marketing campaign designer and other features."
    • "Scripting is required in HI framework to manage data only interactions with the server and to interact with the browser DOM, ActiveX controls and Java Applets etc,. In addition, the HI framework also supports browser scripting for data validations etc,."
    • "One or more settings fixed requires the browser to be restarted. Please exit the Siebel application, launch a new browser and try to login to the Siebel application again."
    • "Please install Sun Java Runtime Environment version %s or higher. The correct Sun Java Runtime Environment can be downloaded from >. After the installation is completed, please configure Sun Java Runtime Environment version %s or higher as the default for your browser. This is performed in the Java Plug-in Control Panel. Please contact your administrator if you need assistance."
    • "Q314312 or above is required for environments using Input Method Editors for eastern languages only, (example: Japanese) on Internet Explorer 5.5. Microsoft makes this patch and related information available through their support organization and/or the following link: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;Q314312.";
    • "Internet Explorer 5.5 Service Pack 2 is a prerequisite for Siebel 7 HI applications running for Internet Explorer 5.5 Microsoft makes this software and related information available through their support organization for customers with extended support contracts and makes additional information available at the following download location: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;enus;Q303201&ID=303201.";
    • "Internet Explorer 6.0 Service Pack 1 or above is a prerequisite for Siebel 7 HI applications running on Internet Explorer 6.0.Microsoft makes this patch and related information available through their support organization or the following download location: http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/downloads/critical/ie6sp1/default.asp. The "Windows Update" feature may provide this and other valuable updates to your browser environment."
    • "The registry entry workaround described in Q823099 is a prerequisite for Siebel 7 HI applications running against SunOne Web servers using Siebel Web Server compression on Internet Explorer. Microsoft makes the workaround instructions available through their support organization or the following location:
    1. Re:It's Seibel E-systems by dcpking · · Score: 1

      It may well be all that everyone has said, but I just went to the page, opened one other PDF forms, filled it out, and went all the way to almost submitting it ... with Firefox on Ubuntu 12.04. Didn't seem too hard. Maybe it's the new browsers that are at fault, not the old systems!

  69. Security by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    In the current stage of pushed cyberwar, to use and force to use such insecure systems (that even Microsoft recognizes it should give a hint) is so cute, just asking everyone to be part of something bigger ...like a botnet. That it be in a government site on which depends (and must visit) a lot of people makes it a nice target.

    Doing it in a country where you can be sued for running a proxy adds a little spice.

  70. How bad can your skills be? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Seriously, the ability to make a web form that only works in ancient technology must take more effort than to do it correctly.

  71. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perfect example of amoeba chimp that is part of the socialist mob.

  72. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Democrats destroyed the middle class. The poor voted for Obama because they can't live without government assistance, or are just too damned ignorant. Most of the rich voted for Obama because they know his party will solidify power and game the system for the already wealthy class. The middle class voted Republican and lost, TWICE!! The illegals will vote mainly a straight ticket for the Democratic thus solidifying a single party rule for the next 100 years!

    Welcome to the two class system. The haves and the have-nots. Suck it bitches!!! May all you mother fuckers suffer pain and anguish. This is the atonement for your sins.

  73. Yeah, and you can claim to be a MSCE by crovira · · Score: 1

    Which is not going to stand you in good stead.

    What if you only have an iPhone or an Android phone?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  74. The Inquirer steals from reddit. by 91degrees · · Score: 2

    Seriously, I saw this last week, before the Inquirer got their mitts on it. It was debunked in the first comment.

  75. Re:I agree, totally wrong by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Producing is pointless if there is nobody to consume. Only with consumption a market is created for only then the produced goods have to be replaced by new goods. If you produce a ton of cheap cars it's useless if there is nobody to buy your car. The cars don't create a profit for you, quite the opposite, you have a lot of unsold cars that cost you money for production, for storage and of course for other expenses like protecting them, while there is NO profit from them. Until someone comes in and BUYS them.

    This is what is lacking in the economy today. Someone to BUY the stuff that is produced. Someone to DEMAND goods and (even more so) services. The DEMAND is down, not the supply. Go into a store of your choice and tell me supplies are short. They're not. There is plenty of supply. There are tons of unsold goods. There are thousands of unemployed who'd love to sell you their workforce. There is simply nobody who would demand it. That's the problem of the current crisis. Rich people are clinging to their money because there is no sensible thing they could invest in. Nothing looks profitable. And with good reason, the only profitable projects are those that can sell. Which they cannot without demand.

    Demand needs two things to be created: First of all, someone has to want a good or service. And second, he has to be able to afford it. Now, I think it's safe to assume that people still want the same things they did 6 years ago. Or at least pretty much the same or similar things. What's lacking is the ability to afford them.

    We need more money on the demand side of the equation. What we're currently doing is pretty much the opposite of what is necessary.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  76. Missing fragment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...you insensitive clod!"

  77. IE6? Luxury! by anchovy_chekov · · Score: 1

    Until only a couple of years ago, Workcover payments here in South Australia required IE5 on a Mac. When I had a bit of a crack at them over it the response was "for security and compatibility". Bah! Funnily enough, changing the user agent setting in Safari to fake IE5 got you through the whole system without any issues.

  78. And even now, this kind of stuff still happens. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At my place of work, there was a months long requirements gathering stage in a project to build a one-size-fits-all knowledge base platform to replace the various ones that smaller groups were running and had been running for over a decade. When you look at the whole department we're probably 50% (and decreasing) Windows of various versions and 50% (and increasing) Mac and Linux on the desktop and laptop, not to mention the massive flood of various iOS and Android tablets and phones coming in through the doors.

    So, after carefully writing out some *mandatory* technical requirements, like:
    - must be supported in popular browsers (Chrome, Firefox, IE8+, Safari) running natively on Linux, Mac and Windows
    - must support phones and tablets running iOS and Android.
    - must not require the use of browser plugins

    The project team went away and we got ... Sharepoint.

    I've never completed the training, because after the initial conversation that went:
    project: "now, open up Internet Explorer"
    me: "can I use Firefox or Chrome instead?"
    project: "no, you must use Internet Explorer, it only works in that, is there a problem?"
    me: closes up MacBook and walks out never to return

    Needless to say, none of my team (0% Windows) and most other teams in the very areas where they want to gain the knowledge from (10% Windows) are able to store any kind of documentation in the new KB.

  79. Smart move by PPH · · Score: 1

    This should cut down on claims payouts.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  80. Re:Google Glasses Problem by TheRealDevTrash · · Score: 1

    Steve Jobs is that you?

    --
    I used to be /dev/trash but Slashdot no longer allows slashes for usernames.
  81. Re:I agree, totally wrong by pwizard2 · · Score: 1

    Oh please. Reagan was the death knell for the middle class. It's all been downhill since that idiot got elected. Even his fellow republicans thought his economic policies were bullshit. Open your mouth and catch some of that nice warm golden trickle-down. Tastes good, doesn't it?

    --
    "It is a denial of justice not to stretch out a helping hand to the fallen; that is the common right of humanity."
  82. Re:Google Glasses Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, but he bollixed it.

  83. Re:Google Glasses Problem by kermidge · · Score: 1

    Yup, pretty much, it's a Britishism. Bollocks = balls. I'd the notion soon after seeing the usage that it rather referred to bull's balls - a way of saying bullshit, if you will, and just as crude. Oddly enough, "dog's bollocks" means about the opposite - in line with cat's pajamas (Br.: pyjamas), cat's whiskers, bee's knees....

    Somedays it seems /. includes an episode of "Fun with Language" however unintentional. Trés amusant, nest pass?

  84. Re:I agree, totally wrong by kermidge · · Score: 1

    "state wither away"

    Oh, _now_ I get it: you're talking about communism. Interesting.

  85. Microsoft partners by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.explore.ms

  86. Webpage creation dated 2006 by evanh · · Score: 1

    The http://www.dwp.gov.uk/eservice/ website appears to be way old! The source code says it was built 13 March 2006.

  87. UK benefits claims reality check by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did anyone check? I went to the DWP site using Windows 7 and Opera. The form comes up as a pdf and is easy to enter. Admittedly mine was only a trial and I did not complete it, but since it is a pdf one could always download it and complete it manually or using free software, if the online version really is limited.

  88. Re: Google Glasses Problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup, and afterwards they have to pay compensation for wrongful arrest. The going rate in the Met Police area is around £3000.

  89. Genius! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What an incredibly inventive way of lowering the cost of the welfare state. Years ago, they just used to make the forms (that were printed on paper and available from post offices) so mind-numbingly tiresome to fill out (with a pen), that most people gave up half way through and embarked on a career of burglary instead.

  90. US Geological Survey publishes in a closed format by bbsalem · · Score: 1

    This complaint is similar to what I discovered this week trying to get topographic map data on-line! The U.S. Geological Survey does allow the public to get topographic map data, which we are entitled to as taxpayers, but they are in a closed source format that is mostly only usable on Windows. There are non-opensource readers, but the format itself and most of its readers are not open source. So data that was paid for by taxpayers is not available unless you use a proprietary platform. I have written e-mail to the national HG in Reston Va., asking for JPG images of the sheets, come to think of it, they could probably supply decent reproductions in ghostscript. If that turns out to be possible. I will make a request to the Interior Committee of Congress to force USGS to publish its on-line versions of maps in ghostscript.

    Again blame Penny-Wise but Pound Foolish in legislatures the world over for cumbersome procurement processes that are intended to prevent fraud but result in leaving most government agencies left in the dust as technology passes them by, often leaving critical operations reliant on broken or unsupportable platforms.

    I worked for USGS from 1976 to 1983 and left primarily because I was tired to asking the agency, the Geologic Division, to adopt UNIX. When I started there they had a Honeywell mainframe running Multics, so I learned about regular expressions and what would become ex inside vi before I had access to UNIX, so that wasn't a total loss. The earthquake research people were getting UNIX by 1980, but the rest of the agency was resisting.

  91. This shit happens everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Argentina, if you have to do taxes, you have to download a VB6 application for windows only, and use that to prepare a file. At least now you can upload the file to a site, but before (I mean just a few years ago) the way to go was write that file to a couple of 3.5" floppies and take it to kiosk in a bank to do the presentation.

  92. Siebel Patch has been available for years by CowboyNick · · Score: 1

    This is because they are on Siebel 7.8.2.3. If they just installed the patch for 7.8.2.16, which includes support for all of this, then there would be no issue. The patch would only take a few hours of downtime so there's no excuse for this. These patches have been available for many years.

    --
    -CowboyNick